Distribution Solutions Group - 10-Q quarterly report FY

 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(847) 827-9666
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, $1 par value, as of July 24, 2009 was 8,522,001.

 

 

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve risks and uncertainties. The terms “may,” “should,” “could,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “continues,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “objective,” “plan,” “potential,” “project” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. These statements are based on management’s current expectations, intentions or beliefs and are subject to a number of factors, assumptions and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences or that might otherwise impact the business include any breach of the terms and conditions of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement with U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Illinois; excess and obsolete inventory; disruptions of the Company’s information systems; risks of rescheduled or cancelled orders; increases in commodity prices; the influence of controlling stockholders; competition and competitive pricing pressures; the effect of general economic conditions and market conditions in the markets and industries the Company serves; the risks of war, terrorism, and similar hostilities; and, all of the factors discussed in the Company’s “Risk Factors” set forth in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

The Company undertakes no obligation to update any such factor or to publicly announce the results of any revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of Lawson Products, Inc. (the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information, the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not contain all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles. Reference should be made to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2009, the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are unaudited. In the opinion of the Company, all normal recurring adjustments have been made, that are necessary to present fairly the results of operations for the interim periods. Operating results for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009.

There have been no material changes in our significant accounting policies during the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the significant accounting policies described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The Company has evaluated subsequent events through July 30, 2009, the filing date of this Form 10-Q, and has determined that there were no subsequent events to recognize or disclose in these financial statements.

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

The Company adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (“SFAS No. 157”),Fair Value Measurements, effective January 1, 2009 for our financial assets and liabilities. Adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. SFAS No. 157 requires the categorization of financial assets and liabilities, based on the inputs to the valuation technique, into a three-level fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to the quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities and lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The various levels of the SFAS No. 157 fair value hierarchy are described as follows:

The following table presents the fair value hierarchy for those assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2009:

Components of inventories were as follows:

During the first half of 2009 the Company implemented certain cost reduction measures, primarily related to the Maintenance, Repair and Operations (“MRO”) segment, in response to economic conditions. These cost reduction measures included a reduction in force of approximately 11%, or approximately 150 employees, across the organization and the closure of its Charlotte, North Carolina distribution center in the first quarter of 2009 and its Dallas, Texas distribution center in the second quarter of 2009. As of June 30, 2009, these cost reduction measures have been substantially completed.

Components of “Severance and other” in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, were as follows:

During the second quarter of 2009, the Company sold its Charlotte, North Carolina distribution center receiving proceeds of $2,179 in cash which resulted in a gain of $395. The Company is preparing its Dallas, Texas distribution center for sale. The book value of $352 has been reclassified to “Property held for sale” in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The property is valued at the lower of carrying amount or estimated net realizable value (proceeds less cost to sell), and will not be depreciated after being classified as held for sale. The unclaimed property liabilities of $3,600 recorded in the first half of 2008 primarily related to years prior to 2003.

Components of the changes in the Company’s reserves for severance and related payments, included in “Accrued expenses and other liabilities” on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:

Components of comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:

During the first half of 2009, 5,000 SPRs were granted with an exercise price of $19.62. The fair value of outstanding SPRs was remeasured on June 30, 2009 using the Black-Scholes valuation model. This model requires the input of the following subjective assumptions that may have a significant impact on the fair value estimate:

Compensation expense for the outstanding SPRs of $287 and $71 was recorded in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the second quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively. During the first half of 2009 and 2008 the Company recorded a compensation benefit of $447 and $1,131, respectively.

The Company conducts business in two reportable segments: MRO and Original Equipment Marketplace (“OEM”). The Company’s MRO segment is a distributor and marketer of systems, services and products to the industrial, commercial, institutional, and governmental maintenance repair and operations marketplace. The Company’s OEM segment manufactures, sells and distributes production and specialized component parts to the original equipment marketplace. The Company’s two reportable segments are distinguished by the nature of products distributed and sold, types of customers and manner of servicing them. The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources to reportable segments primarily based on operating income.

The following table presents summary financial information for the Company’s reportable segments:

Income tax as a percentage of pre-tax loss for the first half of 2009 was 21.2% compared to a negative tax rate of 15.7% for the first half of 2008. The 2009 tax rate was affected by non-deductible expenses and by income earned in jurisdictions with higher tax rates which decreased the net income tax benefit in relation to the overall pre-tax loss. The income tax provision recorded for 2008 was affected by approximately $29,200 of the $30,000 provision related to the settlement of the investigation by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Illinois, which was non-deductible.

At June 30, 2009, the Company had $3,825 in unrecognized tax benefits, the recognition of which would have a favorable effect on the effective tax rate. It is reasonably possible that the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits could increase or decrease significantly during the next twelve months due to the resolution of certain tax uncertainties; however it is not possible to estimate the potential change at this time.

The Company’s continuing practice is to recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. The Company had $1,957 accrued for interest and penalties at June 30, 2009.

The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S Federal income tax as well as income tax of multiple state and international jurisdictions. As of June 30, 2009, the Company is subject to U.S. Federal income tax examinations for the years 2000 through 2007 and to non-U.S. income tax examinations for the tax years of 2000 through 2007. In addition, the Company is subject to state and local income tax examinations for the tax years 2000 through 2007.

The following table presents a summary of the Company’s financial performance for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:

Net sales for the second quarter of 2009 decreased 25.3% to $95.0 million, from $127.1 million in the same period of 2008 as the global economic recession and contraction in the credit markets continued to decrease customer demand throughout our industry. The duration of the recession is uncertain and industry demand may continue to decline and create downward pressure on sales volume throughout 2009.

The sales decline was reflected in both the MRO and the OEM segments. MRO net sales decreased $25.0 million or 23.7% in the second quarter of 2009, to $80.6 million from $105.6 million in the prior year period. OEM net sales decreased $7.0 million or 32.8% in the second quarter of 2009, to $14.5 million from $21.5 million in the prior year period.

Gross profit decreased $17.5 million in the second quarter of 2009, to $55.9 million from $73.4 million in the prior year period. The gross profit margin for the first quarter of 2009 increased by one percentage point to 58.8% compared to 57.8% achieved in the second quarter of 2008. The increase in the overall margin percentage was due to an improvement in the MRO gross margin along with an increase in the proportion of total sales generated by the higher margin MRO segment.

MRO gross profit of $53.2 million in the second quarter of 2009 was $15.8 million lower than the $69.0 million recorded in the prior year period. However, the MRO gross profit as a percent of net sales increased to 66.0% for the second quarter of 2009 from 65.3% in the second quarter of 2008. OEM gross profit decreased $1.8 million in the second quarter of 2009, to $2.7 million from $4.5 million in the prior year period. Gross profit as a percent of net sales decreased to 18.4% for the second quarter of 2009 from 20.7% in the second quarter of 2008 as a result of the increasingly competitive pricing environment.

SG&A expenses were $52.9 million or 55.7% of net sales and $66.2 million or 52.1% of net sales for the quarters ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The $13.3 million reduction in the second quarter of 2009 primarily reflects lower compensation expenses including sales commissions. SG&A as a percent of net sales increased 3.6 percentage points in the second quarter of 2009 compared to the second quarter of 2008 as fixed costs were not reduced in proportion to the overall decrease in net sales.

The Company recorded a $0.5 million net gain in Severance and other in the second quarter of 2009, primarily due to a $0.4 million gain realized on the sale of the Charlotte, North Carolina distribution center. In the second quarter of 2008, the Company recorded $5.9 million of severance and other charges. Of this amount, $2.3 million related to severance costs and $3.6 million related to unclaimed property liabilities primarily for years prior to 2003.

Settlement and Related Costs

During the second quarter of 2008, the Company recorded a $30.0 million provision for penalties in connection with the settlement of the investigation by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Illinois. In addition, the Company recorded expenses of $0.4 million in costs related to the investigation in 2008.

For the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Company recorded $1.3 million of income tax expense on pre-tax income from continuing operations of $3.2 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 40.9%. For the three months ended June 30, 2008, the pretax loss of $29.1 million was mostly due to the non-deductible portion of the penalty incurred from the settlement of the U.S Attorney’s investigation. Adjustments made for the non-deductible expense resulted in taxable income for the second quarter of 2008.

The following table presents a summary of the Company’s financial performance for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:

Net sales for the first half of 2009 decreased 23.2% to $194.4 million, from $253.0 million in the same period of 2008 as the global economic recession and contraction in the credit markets continued to decrease customer demand throughout our industry. The duration of the recession is uncertain and industry demand may continue to decline and create downward pressure on sales volume throughout 2009.

The sales decline was reflected in both the MRO and the OEM segments. MRO net sales decreased $47.6 million or 22.6% in the first six months of 2009, to $163.4 million from $211.0 million in the prior year period. OEM net sales decreased $11.0 million or 26.1% in the first six months of 2009, to $31.0 million from $42.0 million in the prior year period.

Gross profit decreased $37.6 million in the first half of 2009, to $110.0 million from $147.6 million in the prior year period. The gross profit margin for the first half of 2009 was 56.6%, 1.7 percentage points lower than the 58.3% achieved in the first half of 2008. MRO gross profit decreased $33.9 million in the first six months of 2009, to $104.8 million from $138.7 million in the prior year period. MRO gross profit as a percent of net sales decreased to 64.1% for the first half of 2009 from 65.7% in the first half of 2008. OEM gross profit decreased $3.6 million in the first half of 2009, to $5.3 million from $8.9 million in the prior year period. Gross profit as a percent of net sales decreased to 17.0% for the first half of 2009 from 21.1% in the first half of 2008. The decreases recorded in both segments were primarily due to an increasingly competitive pricing environment and an increase in inventory reserves.

SG&A expenses were $109.5 million or 56.3% of net sales and $131.1 million or 51.8% of net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The $21.6 million reduction in the first half of 2009 primarily reflects lower compensation expenses including sales commission. SG&A as a percent of net sales increased 4.5 percentage points in the first half of 2009 compared to the first half of 2008 as fixed costs were not reduced in proportion to the overall decrease in net sales

During the first half of 2009 the Company implemented certain cost reduction measures in response to current economic conditions. These cost reduction measures included a reduction in force of approximately 11%, or approximately 150 employees, across the organization and the closure of its Charlotte, North Carolina and Dallas, Texas distribution centers. The reduction in force and closure of the distribution centers were substantially complete as of June 30, 2009. As a result of these measures, the Company incurred a charge of $6.0 million in the first half of 2009 primarily related to the termination of employees. These cost reduction measures are expected to result in future annualized cost savings of between $10.0 million and $12.0 million.

In the first half of 2008, the Company recorded $6.5 million of severance and other charges. Of this amount, $2.9 million related to severance costs and $3.6 million related to unclaimed property liabilities primarily for years prior to 2003.

Settlement and Related Costs

During the first six months of 2008, the Company recorded a $30.0 million provision for penalties in connection with the settlement of the investigation by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Illinois. In addition, the Company incurred expenses of $0.1 million and $1.2 million in costs related to the investigation in the first half of 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Income tax as a percentage of the pre-tax loss for the first half of 2009 was 21.2% compared to a negative tax rate of 15.7% for the first half of 2008. The 2009 tax rate was affected by non-deductible expenses and by income earned in jurisdictions with higher tax rates which decreased the net income tax benefit in relation to the overall pre-tax loss. The income tax provision recorded for 2008 was affected by approximately $29.2 million of the $30.0 million provision incurred from the settlement of the investigation by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Illinois, which was non-deductible.

Net cash provided by operations was $16.4 million for the first six months of 2009 compared to $5.4 million in the first six months of 2008, primarily due to improved working capital utilization.

Working capital, including cash and cash equivalents, at June 30, 2009, was $87.2 million as compared to $90.0 million at December 31, 2008. Decreases in receivables and inventories were somewhat offset by an increase in cash and a decrease in current liabilities.

Capital expenditures were $2.0 million and $1.7 million for the first six months of 2009 and 2008, respectively. During the second quarter of 2009, the Company sold its previously discontinued Charlotte, North Carolina distribution center. The Company received proceeds of $2.2 million in cash and recorded a gain of $0.4 million on the transaction. Net cash used for financing activities in the first six months of 2009 was $9.9 million compared to $0.9 million in the first six months of 2008, primarily reflecting the $7.7 million pay down all of the outstanding balance of the Company’s revolving line of credit.

The Company announced cash dividends of $.06 per common share during the first half of 2009, compared to the cash dividends of $.40 per share announced in 2008. The Amended Credit Facility entered into in March 2009 restricts the quarterly dividend to $260,000.

The Company’s goodwill balance is normally tested for impairment annually in the fourth quarter. Due to the recent decline in our stock price, the goodwill was reviewed for impairment as of June 30, 2009. According to SFAS 142, Accounting for Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill impairment is deemed to exist if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value and the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds its estimated fair value. The results of our test indicated that the fair value of the applicable reporting unit exceeded its carrying amount. We concluded that as of June 30, 2009 the goodwill balance was not impaired. Further declines in our stock price may reduce the Company’s market value compared to the book value of our net assets and accordingly, we will continue to review goodwill for impairment in future periods.

The generation of cash during the first half of 2009 allowed the Company to pay down all of its revolving line of credit as of June 30, 2009. Cash from operations and the cash available from the revolving line of credit are expected to be adequate to finance the Company’s future operations, including the $10.0 million Deferred Prosecution Agreement settlement payments due in August 2009 and 2010. However, if market and other conditions change from those we anticipate due to a prolonged economic slowdown, our liquidity may be adversely affected.

There have been no material changes in market risk at June 30, 2009 from that reported in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded, based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding financial disclosures.

There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEMS 1, 1A, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of Part II are inapplicable and have been omitted from this report.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.