Gen Digital - 10-Q quarterly report FY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

þ Large accelerated filer     o Accelerated filer          o Non-accelerated filer          o Smaller reporting company

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2of the Exchange Act).  Yes o     No þ

 

Shares of Symantec common stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding as of August 1, 2008: 839,099,530 shares.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 

The condensed consolidated financial statements of Symantec Corporation (“we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Symantec Corporation and all of its subsidiaries) as of July 4, 2008 and March 28, 2008 and for the three months ended July 4, 2008 and June 29, 2007 have been prepared in accordance with the instructions forForm 10-Qpursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and, therefore, do not include all information and notes normally provided in audited financial statements. In the opinion of management, the condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring items, except as otherwise noted, necessary for the fair presentation of our financial position and results of operations for the interim periods. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 28, 2008 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements, however it does not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in our Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended March 28, 2008. The results of operations for the three months ended July 4, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

 

We have a 52/53-week fiscal accounting year. Unless otherwise stated, references to three month ended periods in this report relate to fiscal periods ended July 4, 2008 and June 29, 2007. The July 4, 2008 fiscal quarter consisted of 14 weeks, whereas the June 29, 2007 fiscal quarter consisted of 13 weeks. Our 2009 fiscal year consists of 53 weeks and ends on April 3, 2009.

 

 

There have been no changes in our significant accounting policies during the three months ended July 4, 2008 as compared to the significant accounting policies described in our Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended March 28, 2008.

 

 

In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) IssueNo. 07-5,Determining Whether an Instrument (or an Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock. EITF IssueNo. 07-5provides that an entity should use a two step approach to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the instrument’s contingent exercise and settlement provisions. It also clarifies the impact of foreign currency denominated strike prices and market-based employee stock option valuation instruments on the evaluation. EITF IssueNo. 07-5is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently assessing the impact of EITF IssueNo. 07-5on our consolidated financial statements.

 

In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) APBNo. 14-1,Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement). The FSP will require the issuer of convertible debt instruments with cash settlement features to separately account for the liability and equity components of the instrument. The debt will be recognized at the present value of its cash flows discounted using the issuer’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate at the time of issuance. The equity component will be recognized as the difference between the proceeds from the issuance of the note and the fair value of the liability. The FSP will also require an accretion as interest expense of the resultant debt discount over the expected life of the debt. The transition guidance requires retrospective application to all periods presented, and does not grandfather existing instruments. The guidance will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. Upon adoption of the FSP, we expect the increase in non-cash interest expense recognized on our consolidated financial statements to be significant.

 

 

 

In April 2008, the FASB issued FSPNo. 142-3,Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets.The position amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The position applies to intangible assets that are acquired individually or with a group of other assets and in business combinations and asset acquisitions.FSP 142-3is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We do not expect the adoption of FSPNo. 142-3to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS No. 161 requires disclosures of how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 161 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51. The standard changes the accounting for noncontrolling (minority) interests in consolidated financial statements including the requirements to classify noncontrolling interests as a component of consolidated stockholders’ equity, to identify earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests reported as part of consolidated earnings, and to measure the gain or loss on the deconsolidated subsidiary using the fair value of a noncontrolling equity investment. Additionally, SFAS No. 160 revises the accounting for both increases and decreases in a parent’s controlling ownership interest. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 160 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R,Business Combinations. This standard changes the accounting for business combinations by requiring that an acquiring entity measures and recognizes identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date fair value with limited exceptions. The changes include the treatment of acquisition related transaction costs, the valuation of any noncontrolling interest at the acquisition date fair value, the recording of acquired contingent liabilities at acquisition date fair value and the subsequent re-measurement of such liabilities after acquisition date, the recognition of capitalized in-process research and development, the accounting for acquisition-related restructuring cost accruals subsequent to the acquisition date, and the recognition of changes in the acquirer’s income tax valuation allowance. SFAS No. 141R is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. If the current level of acquisitions activity continues, we expect the implementation of SFAS No. 141R to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements when it becomes effective. The accounting treatment related to pre-acquisition uncertain tax positions will change when SFAS No. 141R becomes effective, which will be in first quarter of our fiscal year 2010. At such time, any changes to the recognition or measurement of uncertain tax positions related to pre-acquisition periods will be recorded through income tax expense, where currently the accounting treatment would require any adjustment to be recognized through the purchase price.

 

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” which defines fair value, establishes guidelines for measuring fair value and expands disclosures regarding fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value measurements but rather eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior accounting pronouncements and is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP No.157-2,The Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually), until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. These nonfinancial items include assets and liabilities such as reporting units measured at fair value in a goodwill impairment test and

 

 

 

nonfinancial assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Effective March 29, 2008, we adopted SFAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities recognized at fair value on a recurring basis. The partial adoption of SFAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. See Note 2 for information and related disclosures regarding our fair value measurements.

 

 

We measure financial assets and liabilities at fair value based upon exit price, representing the amount that would either be received to sell an asset or be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, it may be based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. SFAS No. 157 (as impacted by FSP Nos.157-1 and157-2)establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis whereby inputs, used in valuation techniques, are assigned a hierarchical level. The following are the hierarchical levels of inputs to measure fair value:

 

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, by level within the fair value hierarchy, as of July 4, 2008:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Certain financial assets and liabilities are not included in the table above because they are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These assets and liabilities include non-public equity investments, convertible senior notes and bond hedge (including the derivative call option).

 

The effective date for measuring fair value of nonfinancial assets and liabilities which are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a nonrecurring basis is the fiscal year starting April 4, 2009 and interim period within this fiscal year under FSPFAS No. 157-2.This deferral applies to us for such items as nonfinancial assets and liabilities initially measured at fair value in a business combination but not measured at fair value in subsequent periods, nonfinancial long-lived and intangible asset groups measured at fair value for an impairment assessment, reporting units measured at fair value in the first step of a goodwill impairment test, and nonfinancial restructuring liabilities.

 

 

 

 

The components of comprehensive income, net of tax, are as follows:

 

 

The reclassification adjustment relates to the realization of a foreign exchange translation adjustment relating to the legal liquidation of foreign entities. Accumulated other comprehensive income as of July 4, 2008 and March 28, 2008 primarily consists of foreign currency translation adjustments, net of taxes.

 

 

 

 

 

On April 18, 2008, we completed the acquisition of AppStream, Inc. (“AppStream”), a Palo Alto, California-based provider of endpoint virtualization software. AppStream was acquired to complement our endpoint management and virtualization portfolio and strategy. AppStream’s application streaming technology provides an on-demand delivery mechanism that leverages application virtualization to enable greater flexibility and control. In exchange for all voting equity interests, we purchased AppStream for $53 million, which included acquisition related costs. Cash was used to fund the transaction, and no equity interests were issued. Of the aggregate purchase price, $15 million was allocated to tangible assets, $11 million to identified intangible assets, primarily developed technology, and the remaining $27 million resulted in goodwill. Goodwill, none of which was deductible for tax purposes, resulted primarily from our expectation of synergies from the integration of AppStream’s product offerings with our product offerings. The results of operations for AppStream, since the date of acquisition, are included as part of the Security and Compliance segment. Supplemental proforma information for AppStream is not material and was therefore not included.

 

 

On June 6, 2008, we completed the acquisition of SwapDrive, Inc. (“SwapDrive”), a Washington D.C.-based provider of online storage products. SwapDrive was acquired to strengthen and expand the Norton consumer portfolio by leveraging online backup and storage platform technologies. In exchange for all voting equity interests, we purchased SwapDrive for $124 million, which included acquisition related costs. Cash was used to fund the transaction, and no equity interests were issued. Of the aggregate purchase price, $2 million was allocated to tangible assets and $41 million was allocated to identified intangible assets, primarily developed technology and customer relationships, and the remaining $81 million resulted in goodwill. Goodwill, none of which was deductible for tax purposes, resulted primarily from our expectation of synergies from the integration of SwapDrive’s product offerings with our product offerings. The results of operations for SwapDrive, since the date of acquisition, are included as part of the Consumer segment. Supplemental proforma information for SwapDrive was not material and is therefore not included.

 

 

On February 5, 2008, Symantec formed Huawei-Symantec, Inc. (“joint venture”) with a subsidiary of Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. (“Huawei”). The joint venture is domiciled in Hong Kong with principal operations in Chengdu, China. We contributed cash of $150 million, licenses related to certain intellectual property and other intangible assets in exchange for 49% of the outstanding common shares of the joint venture. The joint venture will develop, manufacture, market and support security and storage appliances to global telecommunications carriers and enterprise customers. Huawei contributed its telecommunications storage and security business assets, engineering, sales and marketing resources, personnel, and licenses related to intellectual property in exchange for a 51% ownership interest in the joint venture.

 

The contribution of assets to the joint venture was accounted for at its carrying value. The historical carrying value of the assets contributed by Symantec comprised a significant portion of the net assets of the joint venture. As a result, our carrying value of the investment in the joint venture exceeded our proportionate share in the underlying net assets of the joint venture by approximately $73 million upon formation of the joint venture. As the contributions for both Symantec and Huawei were recorded at historical carrying value by the joint venture, this basis difference is attributable to the contributed identified intangible assets. The basis difference is being amortized over a weighted-average period of 9 years, the estimated useful lives of the underlying identified intangible assets to which the basis difference is attributed.

 

 

 

We account for our investment in the joint venture under the equity method of accounting. Under this method, we record our proportionate share of the joint venture’s net income or loss based on the quarterly financial statements of the joint venture. We record our proportionate share of net income or loss one quarter in arrears. In determining our share of the joint venture’s net income or loss, we adjust the joint venture’s reported results to recognize the amortization expense associated with the basis difference. For the three months ended July 4, 2008, we recorded a loss of approximately $6 million related to our share of the joint venture’s net loss, including the amortization of the basis difference described above, for the joint venture’s period ended March 31, 2008. This loss is included in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income under the caption “Loss from unconsolidated entity.” The carrying value of our investment in the joint venture as of July 4, 2008 was approximately $144 million.

 

Summarized unaudited statement of operations information for the joint venture and the calculation of our share of the joint venture’s loss are as follows:

 

 

 

 

In accordance with SFAS No. 142, we allocate goodwill to our reporting units, which are the same as our operating segments. Goodwill is allocated as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis during the March quarter, or earlier if indicators of impairment exist. Based on our review as of July 4, 2008, no indicators of impairment were identified.

 

 

Acquired product rights subject to amortization are as follows:

 

 

 

Amortization expense for acquired product rights was $85 million and $89 million for the three months ended July 4, 2008 and June 29, 2007, respectively. Amortization of acquired product rights is included in Cost of revenues in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

 

Amortization expense for acquired product rights, based upon our existing acquired product rights and their current useful lives as of July 4, 2008, is estimated to be as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

Other intangible assets subject to amortization are as follows:

 

 

 

Amortization expense for other intangible assets was $55 million and $57 million for the three months ended July 4, 2008 and June 29, 2007, respectively. Amortization of other intangible assets is included in Operating expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

 

Amortization expense for other intangible assets, based upon our existing other intangible assets and their current useful lives as of July 4, 2008, is estimated to be as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

In July 2006, we entered into a five-year $1 billion senior unsecured revolving credit facility that expires in July 2011. Borrowings under the facility bear interest, at our option, at either a rate equal to the bank’s base rate or a rate equal to LIBOR plus a margin based on our leverage ratio, as defined in the credit facility agreement. In connection with the credit facility, we must maintain certain covenants, including a specified ratio of debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, as well as various other non-financial covenants.

 

On November 29, 2007, we borrowed $200 million under this credit agreement to partially finance our acquisition of Vontu with an interest rate of 4.7075% per annum due and payable quarterly. During the first quarter

 

 

 

of fiscal 2009, we repaid the entire Line of Credit principal amount of $200 million and total interest amount of $3 million. Total interest expense associated with this borrowing was approximately $6 million. As of July 4, 2008, we were in compliance with all required covenants, and there was no outstanding balance on the credit facility.

 

 

We have committed to sell vacant buildings and land with a total carrying value of $40 million and no associated liabilities. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we designated these buildings and land as assets held for sale and included them in Other current assets on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. We believe that these sales will be completed no later than the first quarter of fiscal 2010.

 

 

During the three months ended July 4, 2008, we repurchased 9.7 million shares of our common stock at prices ranging from $19.35 to $21.75 per share for an aggregate amount of $200 million. As of July 4, 2008, an aggregate of $800 million remained authorized for future repurchases from the June 14, 2007 stock repurchase plan.

 

 

The components of earnings per share are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following potential common shares were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive:

 

 

For the three months ended July 4, 2008 and June 29, 2007, the effect of the warrants issued and options purchased in connection with the convertible senior notes were excluded for the reasons discussed in Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended March 28, 2008.

 

 

We currently have in effect certain stock purchase plans, stock award plans, and equity incentive plans, as described in detail in Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended March 28, 2008.

 

Stock-based compensation is included in the same expense line items as salaries and wages in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The following table sets forth the total stock-based compensation expense recognized in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended July 4, 2008 and June 29, 2007.

 

 

As of July 4, 2008, total unrecognized compensation cost adjusted for estimated forfeitures, related to unvested stock options, RSUs, and Restricted Stock Agreements (“RSAs”), was $134 million, $155 million, and $1 million, respectively, which is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average vesting periods of 2.5 years for stock options, 2.6 years for RSUs, and 0.5 years for RSAs.

 

 

 

The weighted-average fair value per option granted during the three months ended July 4, 2008 and June 29, 2007, including assumed options, was $5.23 and $6.23, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three months ended July 4, 2008 and June 29, 2007, including assumed options, was $52 million and $61 million, respectively.

 

The weighted-average fair value per RSU granted during the three months ended July 4, 2008 and June 29, 2007, including assumed RSUs, was $19.94 and $19.45, respectively. The fair value of RSUs granted for the three months ended July 4, 2008 and June 29, 2007 was $171 million and $68 million, respectively. The total fair value of RSUs that vested during the three months ended July 4, 2008 and June 29, 2007, including assumed RSUs, was $49 million and $12 million, respectively.

 

 

Our restructuring costs consist of severance, benefits, facility and other charges. Severance and benefits generally include severance, stay-put or one-time bonuses, outplacement services, health insurance coverage, effects of foreign currency exchange and legal costs. Facilities and other costs generally include rent expense less expected sublease income, lease termination costs, asset abandonment costs and the effects of foreign currency exchange. Restructuring expenses generally do not impact a particular reporting segment and are included in the “Other” reporting segment.

 

 

In fiscal 2008, management approved and initiated a restructuring plan to reduce costs, implement management structure changes, optimize the business structure and discontinue certain products. Projects within the plan began in the third quarter of fiscal 2008. Severance payments related to the plan are expected to be completed by the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 and excess facility obligations are to be paid through the first quarter of fiscal 2012. Charges during the three months ended July 4, 2008 were $10 million related to severance and benefit costs and $5 million related to facility and other costs. Total remaining costs of the restructuring plan, consisting of both severance and benefits and excess facilities costs, are estimated to range between approximately $65 million and $95 million.

 

 

In fiscal 2007, management entered into restructuring plans to consolidate facilities and reduce operating costs. As part of the plan, we consolidated certain facilities and exited facilities related to earlier acquisitions. Excess facilities obligations are expected to be paid through the second quarter of fiscal 2010. Future costs for exited facilities associated with these events are not expected to be significant.

 

 

 

In fiscal 2006, management entered into restructuring plans to reduce operating costs and consolidate facilities. Restructuring liabilities related to these events as of July 4, 2008 are $3 million primarily related to excess facilities and are expected to be paid through the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018.

 

 

Restructuring liabilities related to acquisitions as of July 4, 2008 were $6 million, consisting primarily of excess facilities obligations. Of the $6 million restructuring liability, $3 million relates to the Vontu acquisition and $3 million relates to the Veritas acquisition. These amounts are expected to be paid through the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and 2014, respectively. Charges during the three months ended July 4, 2008 were not significant and primarily represent adjustments to previously recorded costs. Further severance and benefit charges are not expected to be recognized in future periods.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The effective tax rate was approximately 33% and 37% for the three months ended July 4, 2008 and June 29, 2007, respectively. The effective tax rates for both periods are impacted by the benefits of lower-taxed foreign earnings and domestic manufacturing tax incentives, offset by state income taxes and non-deductible stock-based compensation. Additionally, we recorded a $5 million tax benefit related to a favorable Irish settlement for the three months ended July 4, 2008.

 

We file income tax returns in the U.S. on a federal basis and in many U.S. state and foreign jurisdictions. Our two most significant tax jurisdictions are the U.S. and Ireland. Our tax filings remain subject to examination by applicable tax authorities for a certain length of time following the tax year to which those filings relate. Our 2000 through 2007 tax years remain subject to examination by the IRS for U.S. federal tax purposes, and our 2003 through 2007 tax years remain subject to examination by the appropriate governmental agencies for Irish tax purposes. Other significant jurisdictions include California and Japan. As of July 4, 2008, we are under examination by the IRS, for the Veritas U.S. federal income taxes for the 2002 through 2005 tax years.

 

On March 29, 2006, we received a Notice of Deficiency from the IRS claiming that we owe additional taxes, plus interest and penalties, for the 2000 and 2001 tax years based on an audit of Veritas. The incremental tax liability asserted by the IRS was $867 million, excluding penalties and interest. On June 26, 2006, we filed a petition with the

 

 

 

U.S. Tax Court protesting the IRS claim for such additional taxes. The IRS answered our petition on August 30, 2006, at which point the dispute was docketed for trial. In the March 2007 quarter, we agreed to pay $7 million out of $35 million originally assessed by the IRS in connection with several of the lesser issues covered in the assessment. The IRS also agreed to waive the assessment of penalties. During July 2008, we completed the trial phase of the Tax Court case, which dealt with the remaining issue covered in the assessment. At trial, the IRS changed its position with respect to this remaining issue, which decreased the remaining amount at issue from $832 million to $545 million, excluding interest.

 

We strongly believe the IRS’ position with regard to this matter is inconsistent with applicable tax laws and existing Treasury regulations, and that our previously reported income tax provision for the years in question is appropriate. If, upon resolution, we are required to pay an amount in excess of our provision for this matter, the incremental amounts due would be accounted for principally as additions to the cost of Veritas purchase price. Any incremental interest accrued subsequent to the date of the Veritas acquisition would be recorded as an expense in the period the matter is resolved.

 

In July 2008, we reached an agreement with the IRS concerning our eligibility to claim a lower tax rate on a distribution made from a Veritas foreign subsidiary prior to the July 2005 acquisition. The distribution was intended to be made pursuant to the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, and therefore eligible for a 5.25% effective U.S. federal rate of tax, in lieu of the 35% statutory rate. The final impact of this agreement is not yet known since this relates to the taxability of earnings that are otherwise the subject of the tax years2000-2001transfer pricing dispute which in turn is being addressed in the U.S. Tax Court. To the extent that we owe taxes as a result of the transfer pricing dispute, we anticipate that the incremental tax due from this negotiated agreement will decrease. We currently estimate that the most probable outcome from this negotiated agreement will be $13 million or less, for which an accrual has already been made. As previously disclosed inForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended March 28, 2008, we made a payment of $130 million to the IRS for this matter in May 2006. We now intend to apply the excess payment as a deposit on the outstanding transfer pricing matter for the tax years2000-2001.

 

We continue to monitor the progress of ongoing income tax controversies and the impact, if any, of the expected tolling of the statute of limitations in various taxing jurisdictions. Considering these facts, we do not currently believe there is a reasonable possibility of any significant change to our total unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months.

 

 

See Note 14 for a discussion of our tax litigation with the IRS relating to the 2000 and 2001 tax year of Veritas.

 

On July 7, 2004, a purported class action complaint entitled Paul Kuck, et al. v. Veritas Software Corporation, et al. was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The lawsuit alleges violations of federal securities laws in connection with Veritas’ announcement on July 6, 2004 that it expected results of operations for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004 to fall below earlier estimates. The complaint generally seeks an unspecified amount of damages. Subsequently, additional purported class action complaints have been filed in Delaware federal court, and, on March 3, 2005, the Court entered an order consolidating these actions and appointing lead plaintiffs and counsel. A consolidated amended complaint (“CAC”), was filed on May 27, 2005, expanding the class period from April 23, 2004 through July 6, 2004. The CAC also named another officer as a defendant and added allegations that Veritas and the named officers made false or misleading statements in press releases and SEC filings regarding the company’s financial results, which allegedly contained revenue recognized from contracts that were unsigned or lacked essential terms. The defendants to this matter filed a motion to dismiss the CAC in July 2005; the motion was denied in May 2006. In April 2008, the parties filed a stipulation of settlement, which if approved by the Court will resolve the matter. On July 31, 2008, the Court held a final approval hearing and, on August 5, 2008, the Court entered an order approving the settlement. As of March 28, 2008, we have recorded an accrual in the amount of $21.5 million for this matter and, pursuant to the terms of the settlement, we established a settlement fund of $21.5 million on May 1, 2008.

 

 

 

After Veritas announced in January 2003 that it would restate its financial results as a result of transactions entered into with AOL Time Warner in September 2000, numerous separate complaints purporting to be class actions were filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleging that Veritas and some of its officers and directors violated provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The complaints contain varying allegations, including that Veritas made materially false and misleading statements with respect to its 2000, 2001 and 2002 financial results included in its filings with the SEC, press releases and other public disclosures. A consolidated complaint entitled In Re VERITAS Software Corporation Securities Litigation was filed by the lead plaintiff on July 18, 2003. On February 18, 2005, the parties filed a Stipulation of Settlement in the class action. On March 18, 2005, the Court entered an order preliminarily approving the class action settlement. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement, a $35 million settlement fund was established on March 25, 2005. Veritas’ insurance carriers provided for the entire amount of the settlement fund. In July 2007, the Court of Appeals vacated the settlement, finding that the notice of settlement was inadequate. The matter has been returned to the District Court for further proceedings, including reissuance of the notice. If the settlement is not approved, an adverse outcome in this matter could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

 

We are also involved in a number of other judicial and administrative proceedings that are incidental to our business. Although adverse decisions (or settlements) may occur in one or more of the cases, it is not possible to estimate the possible loss or losses from each of these cases. The final resolution of these lawsuits, individually or in the aggregate, is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

 

During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we changed our reporting segments to better align our operating structure. Altiris services that were formerly included in the Security and Compliance segment were moved to the Services segment. This move is as a result of operational changes in our Services segment and the continued integration of our Altiris business. We revised the segment information for the prior year to conform to the new presentation. As of July 4, 2008, our five operating segments are:

 

 

 

 

 

Our reportable segments are the same as our operating segments. The accounting policies of the segments are described in our Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended March 28, 2008. There are no intersegment sales. Our chief operating decision maker evaluates performance based on direct profit or loss from operations before income taxes not including nonrecurring gains and losses, foreign exchange gains and losses, and miscellaneous other income and expenses. Except for goodwill, as disclosed in Note 7, the majority of our assets are not discretely identified by segment. The depreciation and amortization of our property, equipment, and leasehold improvements are allocated based on headcount, unless specifically identified by segment.

 

 

The following table presents a summary of our operating segments:

 

 

 

 

 

The discussion below contains forward-looking statements, which are subject to safe harbors under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements include references to our ability to utilize our deferred tax assets, as well as statements including words such as “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “projects,” and similar expressions. In addition, statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance, anticipated growth and trends in our businesses and in our industries, the anticipated impacts of acquisitions, and other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. These statements are only predictions, based on our current expectations about future events and may not prove to be accurate. We do not undertake any obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events occurring or circumstances arising after the date of this report. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and our actual results, performance, or achievements could differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements on the basis of several factors, including those that we discuss in Risk Factors, set forth in Part I, Item 1A, of our annual report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended March 28, 2008. We encourage you to read that section carefully.

 

 

 

Symantec is a global leader in providing security, storage and systems management solutions to help businesses and consumers secure and manage their information. We provide customers worldwide with software and services that protect, manage and control information risks related to security, data protection, storage, compliance, and systems management. We help our customers manage cost, complexity and compliance by protecting their IT infrastructure as they seek to maximize value from their IT investments.

 

We have a 52/53-week fiscal accounting year. Unless otherwise stated, references to three month ended periods in this report relate to fiscal periods ended July 4, 2008 and June 29, 2007. The July 4, 2008 fiscal quarter consisted of 14 weeks, whereas the June 29, 2007 fiscal quarter consisted of 13 weeks. The extra week in the July 4, 2008 period positively impacted our revenue and earnings for the period, which was partially offset by its negative impact on our cost of revenues and operating expenses.

 

 

Our operating segments are significant strategic business units that offer different products and services, distinguished by customer needs. Since the March 2008 quarter, we have operated in five operating segments: Consumer Products, Security and Compliance, Storage and Server Management, Services, and Other. During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we changed our reporting segments to better align our operating structure. Altiris services that were formerly included in the Security and Compliance segment were moved to the Services segment. This move is as a result of operational changes in our Services segment and the continued integration of our Altiris business. We revised the segment information for the prior year to conform to the new presentation. For further descriptions of our operating segments, see Note 16 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this quarterly report. Our reportable segments are the same as our operating segments.

 

 

Our net income was $187 million for the three months ended July 4, 2008 as compared to our net income of $95 million for the three months ended June 29, 2007. The higher net income for the first quarter of fiscal 2009 as compared to the comparable period last year was primarily due to higher revenues of $1,650 million compared to $1,400 million.

 

Revenue for the three months ended July 4, 2008 was 18% higher than revenue for the three months ended June 29, 2007. During the three months ended July 4, 2008, we delivered revenue growth across all of our

geographic regions as compared to the same period last year and experienced revenue growth in all of our segments. In addition to the foreign currency effects described below, we believe our increased revenue was largely driven by continued demand for our products as a result of the proliferation of structured and unstructured data, the need to simplify and standardize data center infrastructures, the convergence of endpoint security and management, and increased adoption of our Consumer Products suites. Our revenue growth is also attributable to increased awareness of Internet-related security threats around the world and demand for storage solutions.

 

Weakness in the U.S. dollar compared to foreign currencies positively impacted our international revenue growth by approximately $102 million during the three months ended July 4, 2008 as compared to the same period last year. We are unable to predict the extent to which revenues in future periods will be impacted by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. If international sales become a greater portion of our total sales in the future, changes in foreign exchange rates may have a potentially greater impact on our revenues and operating results.

 

 

During the first quarter of fiscal 2009 we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 157 ,Fair Value Measurements. See Note 2 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.

 

In addition, the section entitled “Income Taxes” in our Critical Accounting Estimates section of ourForm 10-Kfor fiscal year 2008 is hereby updated as follows:

 

In July 2008, we reached an agreement with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) concerning our eligibility to claim a lower tax rate on a distribution made from a Veritas foreign subsidiary prior to the July 2005 acquisition. The distribution was intended to be made pursuant to the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, and therefore eligible for a 5.25% effective U.S. federal rate of tax, in lieu of the 35% statutory rate. The final impact of this agreement is not yet known since this relates to the taxability of earnings that are otherwise the subject of the tax years2000-2001transfer pricing dispute which in turn is being addressed in the U.S. Tax Court. To the extent that we owe taxes as a result of the transfer pricing dispute, we anticipate that the incremental tax due from this negotiated agreement will decrease. We currently estimate that the most probable outcome from this negotiated agreement will be $13 million or less, for which an accrual has already been made. As previously disclosed inForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended March 28, 2008, we made a payment of $130 million to the IRS for this matter in May 2006. We now intend to apply the excess payment as a deposit on the outstanding transfer pricing matter for the tax years2000-2001.

 

Other than these changes, there have been no changes in our critical accounting estimates during the three months ended July 4, 2008 as compared to the critical accounting estimates disclosed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended March 28, 2008.

 

 

 

 

Net revenues increased for the three months ended July 4, 2008 as compared to the same period last year primarily due to $147 million in increased sales related to our Storage Foundation, Net Backup, and core Consumer products. The increase in these product lines is driven by continued demand for products related to the standardization and simplification of data center infrastructures, the proliferation of structured and unstructured data, the convergence of endpoint security and management and increased adoption of our Consumer Products suites. We

realized revenue of approximately $75 million as a result of the three months ended July 4, 2008 being comprised of 14 weeks as compared to 13 weeks for the same period last year. Also, as discussed above, under “Financial Results and Trends” revenues were favorably impacted by the weakness of the U.S. dollar compared to foreign currencies.

 

The revenue increases for the three months ended July 4, 2008 discussed above are further described in the segment discussions that follow.

 

 

 

Content, subscriptions, and maintenance revenues increased for the three months ended July 4, 2008 as compared to the same period last year primarily due to an increase of $162 million in revenue related to enterprise products and services. This increase in enterprise product and services revenue is largely attributable to demand for our Storage Foundation, Net Backup, Backup Exec, and Endpoint Protection products as a result of increased demand for security and storage solutions. This increased demand was driven by the proliferation of structured and unstructured data, the convergence of endpoint security and management, and increasing sales of services in conjunction with our license sales as a result of our focus on offering our customers a more comprehensive IT solution. To a lesser extent, content, subscriptions, and maintenance revenues benefited from an additional week of deferred revenue amortization as a result of the July 4, 2008 quarter being comprised of 14 weeks compared to 13 weeks for the same period last year.

 

 

 

Licenses revenues increased for the three months ended July 4, 2008 as compared to the same period last year primarily due to increases in revenue from our Storage Foundation, Net Backup, Altiris and Data Loss Prevention products as a result of increased demand for security and storage solutions. This increased demand was driven by the proliferation of structured and unstructured data, the convergence of endpoint security and management, and the successful integration of the products we acquired from acquisitions into our sales portfolio.

 

 

 

Consumer Products revenues increased for the three months ended July 4, 2008 as compared to the same period last year primarily due to an increase of $99 million in revenue from our new Consumer Products suite and to a lesser extent by a favorable impact of foreign currencies in relation to the U.S. dollar. This revenue increase is due to the increase in demand for Norton 360 during fiscal 2008, as the revenue from our consumer products is generally recognized ratably over the 12 months after the product is sold. This increase is partially offset by aggregate decreases of $51 million in revenue from our Norton Internet Security and Norton AntiVirus products. This decrease results from our customers’ continued migration to our Norton 360 product, which offers broader protection and backup features to address the rapidly changing threat environment. Our electronic orders include sales derived from OEMs, subscriptions, upgrades, online sales, and renewals. Revenue from electronic orders (which includes sales of the aforementioned products) grew by $64 million for the three months ended July 4, 2008 as compared to the same period last year. Electronic orders constituted 78% of Consumer Product revenues for the three months ended July 4, 2008 as compared to 72% for the same period last year.

 

Operating income for the Consumer Product segment increased, as revenue growth exceeded the growth in total expenses for the segment primarily due to our cost containment measures. Total expenses from our Consumer Products segment increased for the three months ended July 4, 2008 as compared to the same period last year because of higher overall sales expenses.

 

 

 

Security and Compliance revenues increased for the three months ended July 4, 2008 as compared to the same period last year primarily due to an aggregate increase of $50 million in revenue as a result of increased demand driven by the convergence of endpoint security and management, and the successful integration of acquired products into our product portfolio.

Operating income for the Security and Compliance segment increased, as revenue growth exceeded the growth in total expenses for the segment. Total expenses from our Security and Compliance segment increased for the three months ended July 4, 2008 as compared to the same period last year by $37 million. This was primarily due to higher overall sales expenses in addition to the inclusion of the Vontu acquisition in this segment.

 

 

 

Storage and Server Management revenues increased for the three months ended July 4, 2008 as compared to the same period last year primarily due to an aggregate increase of $126 million in revenue driven by increased demand for products related to the standardization and simplification of data center infrastructures and due to the proliferation of structured and unstructured data.

 

Operating income for the Storage and Server Management segment increased, as revenue growth exceeded the growth in total expenses for the segment. Total expenses in our Storage and Server Management segment increased for the three months ended July 4, 2008 as compared to the same period last year by $26 million. These increases were primarily due to higher overall sales expenses.

 

 

 

Services revenues increased for the three months ended July 4, 2008 as compared to the same period last year primarily due to an increase in consulting services of $22 million as a result of increased demand for more comprehensive software implementation assistance. Customers are increasingly purchasing our service offerings in conjunction with the purchase of our products and augmenting the capabilities of their own IT staff with our onsite consultants. To a lesser extent Services revenue increased due to increased demand for our Business Critical Services.

 

Operating losses for the Services segment decreased, as revenue growth exceeded the growth in total expenses for the segment. The Services operating margin improvement was the result of financial and operational efficiencies aimed at driving profitability. Total expenses from our Services segment increased for the three months ended

July 4, 2008 as compared to the same period last year by $18 million. This increase is primarily due to higher wages and outside services costs of $15 million required to support the segment’s revenue growth.

 

 

 

Revenue from our Other segment is comprised primarily of sunset products and products nearing the end of their life cycle. The operating loss of our Other segment also includes general and administrative expenses; amortization of acquired product rights, other intangible assets, and other assets; charges, such as acquired in-process research and development, stock-based compensation, and restructuring; and certain indirect costs that are not charged to the other operating segments.

 

 

 

EMEA and Asia Pacific/Japan revenues increased in the three months ended July 4, 2008 as compared to the three months ended June 29, 2007 primarily due to increased revenues related to our Storage and Server Management and Security and Compliance products of $101 million, as a result of increased demand for products related to the standardization and simplification of data center infrastructures, the proliferation of structured and unstructured data, and the convergence of endpoint security and management. This increased demand was driven by the successful integration of acquired products into our product portfolio. Revenues in EMEA and Asia Pacific/Japan also increased by $21 million in the three months ended July 4, 2008 as compared to the three months ended June 29, 2007 from sales of our Consumer Products, driven by demand for our Consumer Products suites. Americas revenues increased in the three months ended July 4, 2008 as compared to the three months ended June 29, 2007

primarily due to increased revenues related to our Storage and Server Management, Security and Compliance, and our Consumer Products segments of $95 million, as a result of increased demand as discussed above.

 

Foreign currencies had a favorable impact on net revenues for the three months ended July 4, 2008 as compared to the same period last year. We are unable to predict the extent to which revenues in future periods will be impacted by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. If international sales become a greater portion of our total sales in the future, changes in foreign currency exchange rates may have a potentially greater impact on our revenues and operating results.

 

 

 

Cost of revenues consists primarily of the amortization of acquired product rights, fee-based technical support costs, the costs of billable services, payments to OEMs under revenue-sharing arrangements, manufacturing and direct material costs, and royalties paid to third parties under technology licensing agreements.