Goodyear
GT
#5722
Rank
HK$10.52 B
Marketcap
HK$36.57
Share price
-0.43%
Change (1 day)
-37.85%
Change (1 year)
Categories
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company is an American tire manufacturer. Goodyear manufactures tires for automobiles, commercial trucks, light trucks, motorcycles, airplanes, farm equipment and heavy earth-mover machinery.
Text size:
1

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 1-1927

THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
OHIO 34-0253240
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF (I.R.S. EMPLOYER
INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) IDENTIFICATION NO.)


1144 EAST MARKET STREET, AKRON, OHIO 44316-0001
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES) (ZIP CODE)
</TABLE>


REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (330) 796-2121


SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE ON
TITLE OF EACH CLASS WHICH REGISTERED
--------------------- ------------------------
<S> <C>
Common Stock, Without Par Value New York Stock Exchange
Chicago Stock Exchange
Pacific Exchange

Preferred Stock Purchase Rights New York Stock Exchange
Chicago Stock Exchange
Pacific Exchange
</TABLE>


SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:

None

----------------------------

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes X No
--- ---

----------------------------

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to
Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein or in the definitive proxy
statement incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K. [X].

----------------------------

The aggregate market value of Registrant's outstanding Common Stock
held by nonaffiliates of the Registrant on February 15, 2001, determined using
the per share closing price thereof on the New York Stock Exchange Composite
Transactions tape of $25.24 on that date, was approximately $4,004,362,724.20.

----------------------------

SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, WITHOUT PAR VALUE, OUTSTANDING AT FEBRUARY 15, 2001:

158,760,805

----------------------------

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

PORTIONS OF REGISTRANT'S DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT, DATED FEBRUARY 26,
2001, FOR ITS 2001 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS ARE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
INTO PART III.
2
THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000

TABLE OF CONTENTS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ITEM PAGE
NUMBER NUMBER
------ ------

<S> <C> <C>
PART I

1 Business ........................................... 1

2 Properties ......................................... 21

3 Legal Proceedings .................................. 23

4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 27

4(A) Executive Officers of Registrant ................... 27


PART II

5 Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters ............................... 32

6 Selected Financial Data ............................ 33

7 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations ............... 34

7(A) Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk ....................................... 51

8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data ........ 53

9 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure ............... 82


PART III

10 Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant . 82

11 Executive Compensation ............................. 82

12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management ........................................ 82

13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions ..... 82

PART IV

14 Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports
on Form 8-K ....................................... 83

Signatures ........................................ 85

Index to Financial Statement Schedules ............ FS-1

Index of Exhibits ................................. X-1
</TABLE>
3
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

BUSINESS OF GOODYEAR

The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company is an Ohio corporation organized in
1898. Its principal offices are located at 1144 East Market Street, Akron, Ohio
44316-0001. Its telephone number is (330) 796-2121. The term "Registrant"
wherever used herein refers solely to The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. The
terms "Goodyear" and the "Company" wherever used herein refer to The Goodyear
Tire & Rubber Company together with all of its consolidated domestic and foreign
subsidiary companies, unless the context indicates to the contrary.

Goodyear is one of the world's leading manufacturers of tires and
rubber products, engaging in operations in most regions of the world. Goodyear's
2000 net sales were $14.4 billion. Goodyear's net income for 2000 was $40.3
million. Goodyear's worldwide employment averaged 106,724 during 2000.

Goodyear's principal business is the development, manufacture,
distribution and sale of tires for most applications. Goodyear also manufactures
and markets several lines of rubber and other products for the transportation
industry and various other industrial and consumer markets and numerous
rubber-related chemicals for various applications, provides automotive repair
and other services at retail and commercial outlets and sells various other
products.

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION - SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT

Certain information set forth herein (other than historical data and
information) may constitute forward-looking statements regarding events and
trends which may affect Goodyear's future operating results and financial
position. The words "estimate," "expect," "intend" and "project," as well as
other words or expressions of similar meaning, are intended to identify
forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K. Such statements are based on current expectations and
assumptions, are inherently uncertain, are subject to risks and should be viewed
with caution. Actual results and experience may differ materially from the
forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including: changes in
general economic and industry conditions in the various markets served by
Goodyear's operations; price and product competition; increased competitive
activity; demand for Goodyear's products; fluctuations in the prices paid for
raw materials and energy; the ability to control costs and expenses; changes in
the monetary policies of various countries where Goodyear has significant
operations; changes in interest and currency exchange rates; and other
unanticipated events and conditions. It is not possible to foresee or identify
all such factors. Goodyear disclaims any intention, commitment or obligation to
revise or update any forward-looking statement, or to disclose any facts, events
or circumstances that occur after the date hereof which may affect the accuracy
of any forward-looking statement.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN GOODYEAR'S BUSINESS

SIGNIFICANT TRANSACTIONS. On October 31, 2000, Goodyear and Arkansas
Best Corporation formed a joint venture company, Wingfoot Commercial Tire
Systems, LLC ("Wingfoot") to engage in selling and servicing commercial truck
tires, providing retread services and conducting related businesses. Goodyear
transferred its commercial truck tire outlets and related assets in exchange for
81% of the equity of the joint venture and Arkansas Best Corporation's
subsidiary, Treadco Inc., contributed substantially all of its assets to
Wingfoot in exchange for 19% of Wingfoot. Wingfoot operates 197 commercial tire
sales and servicing outlets, including 78 truck tire retreading facilities,
throughout the United States. Arkansas Best Corporation has the right at any
time after April 30, 2003 and before April 30, 2004 to sell its 19% interest in
Wingfoot to Goodyear for approximately $74 million and Goodyear has the right at
any time after April 30, 2003 and before October 31, 2004 to purchase Treadco's
interest in Wingfoot for approximately $79 million.

In June 2000, Goodyear and the Michelin group established a joint
venture company in The Netherlands, each owning a 50% equity interest, for
cooperative research and development of advanced run-flat tire technologies.
Goodyear has licensed its extended mobility tire technology


1
4
and tire pressure monitoring system to Michelin. Michelin has licensed its PAX
System to Goodyear. The PAX System consists of a tire with a unique bead lock
and a run flat insert, a special wheel and a tire pressure warning system.
Goodyear and Michelin will focus on accelerating the availability of the PAX
System and the incorporation of EMT technology into the PAX System. The joint
venture will also provide auto manufacturers additional sourcing opportunities
by enabling Goodyear and Michelin to develop complimentary and interchangeable
products.

Goodyear and five other tire companies, Continental, Cooper Tire,
Michelin, Pirelli and Sumitomo, have founded RubberNetwork.com LLC, an
independent global electronic purchasing and procurement marketplace, which is
preparing to commence commercial operations in April 2001. In addition to
procurement services, RubberNetwork.com LLC plans to offer a complete set of
marketplace solutions to industrial companies in the tire and rubber industry,
including e-catalogs, auctions, requests for proposals and/or quotes and supply
chain management.

A global alliance with Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd. ("Sumitomo")
was established on September 1, 1999, when Goodyear acquired 75%, and Sumitomo
acquired 25%, of a Netherlands holding company which purchased substantially all
of Sumitomo's tire businesses in Europe (operated under the Dunlop trade style)
and the major portion of Goodyear's tire businesses in Europe. Goodyear also
acquired 75%, and Sumitomo 25%, of a holding company in the United States that
purchased Sumitomo's tire manufacturing operations and certain tire related
distribution operations in North America and 100% of the balance of Sumitomo's
Dunlop tire distribution operations in North America. In Japan, Goodyear owns
25%, and Sumitomo owns 75%, of two companies, one for the sale of Goodyear-brand
passenger and truck tires in the Japanese replacement market and the other for
the sale of Goodyear-brand and Dunlop-brand tires to vehicle manufacturers in
Japan. Goodyear also owns 80%, and Sumitomo owns 20%, of the capital stock of a
newly formed global purchasing company. In August 2000, Goodyear acquired 10% of
the capital stock of Sumitomo and in August 2000 and February 2001 Sumitomo
acquired 2,278,896 shares of Goodyear Common Stock. Since September 1, 1999,
Goodyear has taken certain rationalization actions to reduce costs and has
developed plans to realize the benefits of various synergies that are or may be
available as a result of the global alliance with Sumitomo, which actions and
plans are designed to result in annual cost savings of $300 million to $360
million by 2003, depending on, among other things, the demand for tires, in the
relevant markets, pricing flexibility, raw material and other costs and general
economic conditions.

NEW PRODUCTS AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTS. Goodyear introduced several new
lines of tires around the world during 2000. In North America, a number of new
passenger tire lines were introduced, including the Aquatred 3, a premium all
season tire, providing improved traction and durability. Also introduced were
the Wrangler MT/R and Wrangler Ultra Grip lines for light truck and sport
utility vehicles. Two new medium commercial truck tire lines were introduced,
the G397LHS radial steer truck tire with reinforced supertensile steel and
polyimide belts and the Wingfoot APR all position rib tire.

MODERNIZATION AND EXPANSION PROJECTS. During 2000, Goodyear continued
to increase productivity and enhance product quality through plant modernization
and expansion projects. Significant tire plant projects were completed during
2000 at the Company's Napanee, Ontario, Danville, Virginia, Union City,
Tennessee, Americana, Brazil, Dalian, China, Bogor, Indonesia, and Izmit, Turkey
tire plants. Significant tire plant projects are presently underway at the
Company's Lawton, Oklahoma, Danville, Virginia, Union City, Tennessee,
Philippsburg and Wittlich, Germany, and Colmar-Berg, Luxembourg tire plants.
Goodyear completed construction of its new $130 million synthetic rubber and
specialty polymer plant in Beaumont, Texas, which commenced commercial
operations in late 2000.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT GOODYEAR'S SEGMENTS

Financial information relating to Goodyear's "Segments" for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2000 appears in Note 20 captioned
"Business Segments" of the Notes to Financial Statements set forth in Item 8 of
this Annual Report, at pages 76 through 79, inclusive, and is incorporated
herein by specific reference.

2
5
DESCRIPTION OF GOODYEAR'S BUSINESS


GENERAL SEGMENT INFORMATION

Segment information is presented to reflect Goodyear's operating
business units. Goodyear's operating "Segments" are North American Tire,
European Union Tire, Eastern Europe, Africa and Middle East Tire, Latin American
Tire and Asia Tire (collectively the "Tire Segments"), Engineered Products and
Chemical Products.

Each Tire Segment manufactures tires that are exported and sold to one
or more of the other Tire Segments. The sales and operating income of each Tire
Segment exclude sales and operating income in respect of tires sold to other
Tire Segments and include sales and operating income derived from tires imported
from other Tire Segments and tires exported to unaffiliated customers. Sales and
operating income of the Chemical Products segment include sales and operating
income in respect of products transferred to the Tire Segments or the Engineered
Products segment.


GENERAL INFORMATION REGARDING TIRE SEGMENTS

Goodyear's principal business is the development, manufacture,
distribution and sale of tires and related products and services worldwide.
Goodyear manufactures and markets numerous lines of rubber tires for:

- automobiles - farm implements
- trucks - earthmoving equipment
- buses - aircraft
- motorcycles - industrial equipment
- various other applications

in each case for sale to original equipment manufacturers and in replacement
markets worldwide. Goodyear also:

- manufactures and sells flaps for truck tires and other types of
tires.
- retreads truck, aircraft and heavy equipment tires.
- manufactures and sells tread rubber and other tire retreading
materials.
- provides automotive repair services and miscellaneous other products
and services.

The total sales and operating income of the Tire Segments during the
periods indicated were:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Total sales of Tire Segments .......... $12,674.9 $11,645.5 $11,304.2
Total operating income of Tire Segments $ 491.7 $ 357.8 $ 809.9
</TABLE>

The Dunlop businesses, which were acquired on September 1, 1999, contributed
sales to the Tire Segments of $2.3 billion during the year ended December
31, 2000 and $873.4 million during the four months ended December 31, 1999. Of
the 223.3 million tires sold by Goodyear during 2000, 37.3 million were sold by
the Dunlop businesses. In 1999, the Dunlop businesses sold 14.4 million of the
200.5 million tires sold by Goodyear.

The principal class of products of the Tire Segments is new tires for
most applications. The percentages of Goodyear's consolidated net sales and
operating income attributable to the Tire Segments, and the percentage of
Goodyear's net sales attributable to new tires, for each year in the three year
period ended December 31, 2000 were:



3
6
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Total sales of Tire Segments .......... 87.9% 87.2% 86.4%
Total operating income of Tire Segments 82.1% 65.7% 76.8%
Tire sales .................. 81.2% 79.5% 77.2%
</TABLE>

Worldwide, Goodyear's sales of new tires to the numerous replacement
markets it serves substantially exceed its sales of new tires to original
equipment manufacturers. Goodyear's worldwide tire unit sales in the replacement
markets served and to vehicle manufacturers for mounting as original equipment
on vehicles ("OE") during the periods indicated were:

GOODYEAR ANNUAL TIRE UNIT SALES - REPLACEMENT AND OE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(IN MILLIONS OF TIRES) YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------
2000 1999 1998
----- ----- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Replacement ................. 157.8 141.3 132.9
Original Equipment .......... 65.5 59.2 54.7
----- ----- -----
Total Goodyear Worldwide 223.3 200.5 187.6
</TABLE>

Goodyear offers two basic constructions of tires, radial and bias ply.
Various belting and reinforcing materials are used, including nylon and
polyester fiber tire cord and steel belts and tire cord. Approximately 96.6% of
all passenger tires, 85.3% of all light truck tires and 79.7% of all medium
truck tires sold by Goodyear during 2000 were radial construction.

No customer or group of affiliated customers accounted for as much as
4.7% of Goodyear's consolidated net sales during 2000, 1999 or 1998. Worldwide,
Goodyear's annual net sales to its ten largest customers, including their
respective affiliates, represented less than 22.0% of consolidated net sales
during each of 2000, 1999 or 1998.

No customer or group of affiliated customers accounted for as much as
4.8% of the sales of the Tire Segments during 2000, 1999 or 1998. Annual sales
by the Tire Segments to the ten largest customers of the Tire Segments,
including their respective affiliates, represented less than 22.5% of the total
sales of the Tire Segments during each of 2000, 1999 or 1998.

New tires are sold under highly competitive conditions throughout the
world. On a worldwide basis, Goodyear has two major competitors:
Bridgestone/Firestone (based in Japan) and Michelin/UniroyalGoodrich (based in
France). Other significant competitors include Continental/ General, Cooper
Tire, Pirelli, Sumitomo, Toyo, Yokohama, Kumho, Hankook and various regional
tire manufacturers.

Goodyear competes with other tire manufacturers on the basis of product
design, performance, price and reputation, warranty terms, customer service and
consumer convenience. Goodyear-brand tires enjoy a high recognition factor
worldwide and have a reputation for performance, high quality and value.
Goodyear believes Dunlop-brand tires enjoy a high recognition factor in North
America and Europe and have a reputation for performance, quality and value.
Kelly-brand, Fulda-brand, Debica-brand, Sava-brand and various other house brand
tire lines offered by Goodyear, and tires manufactured and sold by Goodyear to
private brand customers, compete primarily on the basis of value and price.

Goodyear does not consider its businesses as a whole, or the businesses
of the Tire Segments whether considered individually or as a group, to be
seasonal to any significant degree. A significant inventory of new tires is
usually maintained in order to optimize production schedules and assure prompt
delivery to customers, especially original equipment manufacturers that require
"just in time" deliveries of tires or tire and wheel assemblies. Tire production
and inventory levels are generally managed to avoid unnecessary increases in
unit production costs and limit working capital requirements by optimizing
production schedules consistent with anticipated demand.



4
7
During 1999 and into the first quarter of 2000, the demand in North
America for certain Goodyear-brand passenger and truck tire lines and sizes,
primarily from its original equipment and mass merchandise retail chain
customers, exceeded the Company's ability to supply tires when ordered,
resulting in significantly lower than normal order fill rates. Order fill rates
have returned to normal levels.

Tire unit sales for each of the Tire Segments and for Goodyear
worldwide during the periods indicated were:

GOODYEAR'S ANNUAL TIRE UNIT SALES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------
(IN MILLIONS OF TIRES) 2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
North American Tire ......................... 115.9 109.1 105.0
European Union Tire ......................... 60.3 45.7 35.4
Eastern Europe, Africa and Middle East Tire . 15.6 15.8 15.5
Latin American Tire ......................... 19.7 17.8 20.8
Asia Tire ................................... 11.8 12.1 10.9
------ ------ ------
Goodyear worldwide .................. 223.3 200.5 187.6
</TABLE>

The following table indicates the percentage change in Goodyear's
annual unit sales of passenger, truck and farm tires by Tire Segment and
worldwide:

PERCENTAGE INCREASE (DECREASE) IN GOODYEAR'S ANNUAL TIRE UNIT SALES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 VS 1999 1999 VS 1998
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
North American Tire ........................ 6.3% 3.8%
European Union Tire ........................ 31.8% 29.1%
Eastern Europe, Africa and Middle East Tire (1.5)% 2.2%
Latin American Tire ........................ 11.0% (14.7)%
Asia Tire .................................. (2.1)% 11.3%

Tire Segments worldwide ............ 11.4% 6.9%
</TABLE>

Based on information available from various industry and other sources,
Goodyear estimates that, worldwide, passenger and truck tire shipments by the
industry during the periods indicated were:

ESTIMATED ANNUAL WORLDWIDE INDUSTRY TIRE SHIPMENTS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------
(IN MILLIONS OF TIRES) 2000 1999 1998
----- ----- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Worldwide industry tire shipments 892.4 870.0 822.5
</TABLE>

On the basis of annual net tire sales, Goodyear was the largest tire
manufacturer in the world during 2000. Based on information published by the
Rubber Manufacturers Association (the "RMA") and various other sources, it is
estimated that Goodyear's share of the worldwide auto, truck and farm tire
markets was approximately:

GOODYEAR SHARE OF GLOBAL TIRE MARKET
(AUTO, TRUCK AND FARM TIRES)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Goodyear share of global tire market 23.0% 20.1% 19.1%
</TABLE>


5
8
NORTH AMERICAN TIRE

Goodyear's largest segment, the North American tire business ("North
American Tire"), develops, manufactures, distributes and sells tires and related
products and services in the United States and Canada. The principal class of
products of North American Tire is new tires for most applications. North
American Tire manufactures tires in 14 plants in the United States and Canada.

The sales and operating income of North American Tire during the
periods indicated were:

NORTH AMERICAN TIRE SALES AND OPERATING INCOME

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------
(IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
North American Tire sales .......... $7,111.3 $6,648.6 $6,507.9
North American Tire operating income $ 260.7 $ 26.3 $ 314.2
</TABLE>

The Dunlop businesses in North America contributed sales of $755.0 million
during 2000, and $252.3 million during the four months ended December 31, 1999.

North American Tire sold approximately 115.9 million tires during 2000,
including 12.3 million tires sold by the Dunlop businesses. North American Tire
sold 109.1 million tires during 1999, including 4.1 million units sold by the
Dunlop businesses, and 105.0 million tires during 1998.

The percentages of Goodyear's consolidated net sales and operating
income attributable to North American Tire, and the percentages of the North
American Tire's sales attributable to new tires, for the periods indicated were:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
North American Tire sales .......... 49.3% 49.8% 49.7%
North American Tire operating income 43.5% 4.8% 29.8%
Tire sales ............... 89.9% 88.1% 86.3%
</TABLE>

TIRES. North American Tire manufactures and sells a broad line of tires
in North America for automobiles, trucks, motorcycles, buses, farm implements,
earthmoving equipment, aircraft and industrial equipment and for various other
applications.

Goodyear-brand radial passenger tire lines sold in North America
include the Aquatred line of tires, Eagle high performance and touring tires,
Eagle Aquatred high performance tires, and run-flat extended mobility technology
(EMT) tires. The major lines of Goodyear-brand radial tires offered in the
United States and Canada for sport utility vehicles and light truck are the
Wrangler and Workhorse. North American Tire also manufactures and sells
Dunlop-brand, Kelly-brand, other house brand and several private-brand radial
passenger tires in the United States and Canada.

North American Tire manufactures and markets a full line of
Goodyear-brand all-steel cord and belt construction radial medium truck tires,
the Unisteel series, for various applications, including line haul highway use
and off-road service. The current truck tire line includes the Unisteel G-177,
which features a high-tensile steel reinforced cording, a skid resistant tread
design and a new damage resistant tread compound, and the Unisteel G-397 line
haul steer tire, which features reinforced belting of super-tensile steel with a
polyimide top belt for resistance to damage and rust propagation and increased
retreadability. North American Tire also manufactures and distributes various
lines of Dunlop-brand and Kelly-brand radial and bias-ply truck tires for sale
in the United States and Canadian replacement markets.


6
9
Several lines of tires for other applications are manufactured by
Goodyear in North America, including radial and bias-ply tires for farm
machinery and heavy equipment. Goodyear also manufactures aircraft tires for
commercial and military aircraft in the United States.

RELATED PRODUCTS AND SERVICES. North American Tire also:

- retreads truck, aircraft and heavy equipment tires, primarily as a
service to its commercial customers.
- manufactures tread rubber and other tire retreading materials for
various applications.
- provides automotive maintenance and repair services at 1,091 retail
outlets.
- sells automotive repair and maintenance items, automotive equipment
and accessories and other items to dealers and consumers.
- provides miscellaneous other products and services.

MARKET AND OTHER INFORMATION

North American Tire sells Goodyear-brand and Dunlop-brand tires to OE
customers for use as original equipment on vehicles they produce and sells
Goodyear-brand, Dunlop-brand, Kelly-brand, other house brand and several lines
of private brand tires through various channels of distribution for sale to
vehicle owners for replacement purposes. Goodyear's sales of tires in the North
American replacement markets substantially exceed its sales of tires to OE
customers.

Tire unit sales to OE customers and in the replacement markets in the
United States and Canada during the periods indicated were:



NORTH AMERICAN TIRE UNIT SALES - REPLACEMENT AND OE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------
(IN MILLIONS OF TIRES) 2000 1999 1998
----- ----- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Replacement tire unit sales ...... 79.5 71.8 70.1
Original Equipment tire unit sales 36.4 37.3 34.9
Total .................. 115.9 109.1 105.0
</TABLE>

During 2000, North American Tire exported and sold approximately 2.7%
(2.6% in 1999) of its tire production to unaffiliated customers outside North
America, delivered approximately 1.9% (1.9% in 1999) of its tire production to
the other Tire Segments, primarily European Union Tire and Latin American Tire,
and imported approximately 8.0% (8.0% in 1999) of the tires it sold from the
other Tire Segments, primarily Latin American Tire and Asia Tire.

All passenger tires (except bias-ply temporary spare tires) and
approximately 96.0% of all light and medium truck tires sold by Goodyear in the
United States and Canada during 2000 were radial construction. Approximately
29.8% (36.9% in 1999 and 33.8% in 1998) of all passenger tires sold by the
Company in the United States and Canada during 2000 were high performance type
tires.

No customer or group of affiliated customers of North American Tire
accounted for as much as 6.1% of its sales during 2000, 7.3% of its sales during
1999 or 7.0% during 1998. The ten largest customers of North American Tire
accounted for less than 36.0% of its sales during 2000, less than 35.5% of its
sales during 1999 and less than 34.7% of its sales during 1998.

Goodyear is a major supplier of tires to most manufacturers of
automobiles, trucks, farm and construction equipment and aircraft that have
facilities located in North America. North


7
10
American Tire supplies tires to most motor vehicle manufacturers with plants in
North America, including:

- DaimlerChrysler - AAI
- Ford - Freightliner
- General Motors - International Truck and Engine
- BMW - Kenworth
- Honda - Mack Truck
- Mitsubishi - Peterbuilt
- Nissan - Caterpillar
- Toyota - John Deere
- Volvo - J.I. Case

Aircraft manufacturers supplied by Goodyear include Boeing and Lockheed-Martin.

Goodyear's major competitors in the North American tire market are
Bridgestone/Firestone, Michelin/UniroyalGoodrich, Continental/General and Cooper
Tire, each with manufacturing facilities and other operations in North America.
Other significant competitors in North America are Pirelli, Toyo, Yokohama,
Kumho, Hankook, who are primarily importers of tires, and various regional tire
manufacturers that export tires to North America.

Goodyear-brand, Dunlop-brand and Kelly-brand tires are sold in the
United States and Canadian replacement markets through several channels of
distribution. The principal method of distribution for Goodyear-brand tires is a
large network of independent dealers. Goodyear-brand, Dunlop-brand and
Kelly-brand tires are also sold to numerous national and regional retail
marketing firms in the United States, including Sears Roebuck & Co., Wal-Mart,
Penske Auto Centers and numerous other firms. In addition, Goodyear operates
approximately 1,091 retail outlets (including auto service centers, commercial
tire and service centers and leased space in department stores) under the
Goodyear name or under the Brad Ragan, Carolina Tire, Allied or Just Tires trade
styles. Several lines of Dunlop-brand and Kelly-brand and various other house
brand passenger and truck tires are marketed through independent dealers.
Private brand and associate brand tires are sold to independent dealers, to
national and regional wholesale marketing organizations, including
TBCCorporation, retail chain marketers, including Wal-Mart, Discount Tire, Sears
Roebuck & Co. and Big-O, and to various other retail marketers.

Automotive parts, automotive maintenance and repair services and
associated merchandise are sold under highly competitive conditions in the
United States and Canada through retail outlets operated by Goodyear. Automotive
repair and maintenance items, and associated merchandise are purchased by
Goodyear for distribution to many of Goodyear's tire dealers.

North American Tire from time to time offers various financing and
extended payment programs to certain of its tire customers in the replacement
market. Goodyear does not believe these programs, when considered in the
aggregate, require an unusual amount of working capital relative to the volume
of sales involved and prevailing tire industry practices. Tire inventories are
maintained at levels designed to optimize production schedules, assure prompt
delivery to customers and minimize working capital requirements, subject to
adjustments to reflect unanticipated changes in demand.

Based on data published by the RMA and information obtained from other
industry sources, industry shipments of passenger and light and medium highway
truck tires in the United States during the periods indicated were:

INDUSTRY ANNUAL UNIT SALES IN THE UNITED STATES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------
(IN MILLIONS OF TIRES) 2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
U.S. Passenger Tire shipments .................... 259 253 242
U.S. Light and Medium Truck Tire shipments ....... 63 64 58
---- ---- ----
Total Industry Passenger and Truck Tire shipments 322 317 300
</TABLE>


8
11

Based on current economic forecasts, Goodyear expects the total market
for passenger tires in the United States in 2001 to be 258 million tires, a
decrease of over one million units compared to 2000. Passenger tire demand in
2001 is expected to be 1.7% lower than in 2000 in the original equipment market
and .4% lower than in 2000 in the replacement market. Goodyear estimates that
demand for light and medium highway truck tires in the United States during 2001
will be 64 million units, a 1% increase compared to 2000.

Goodyear sold more tires in the United States and Canada than any other
tire manufacturer during the three years ended December 31, 2000. Based on
information published by industry and other sources, Goodyear estimates that its
share of the North American (United States and Canada) tire market in each of
the periods indicated was approximately:


GOODYEAR'S SHARE OF TIRE MARKET - U.S. AND NORTH AMERICA

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, UNITED STATES NORTH AMERICA
----------------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
2000 ................. 30.8% 31.1%
1999 ................. 28.9% 29.6%
1998 ................. 28.8% 29.6%
</TABLE>

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ("NHTSA"), under
authority granted to it by the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of
1966, as amended, has established various standards and regulations relating to
motor vehicle safety, some of which apply to tires sold in the United States for
highway use. NHTSA has the authority to order the recall of automotive products,
including tires, having defects deemed to present a significant safety risk.
NHTSA requires the registration of tires for identification in the event of a
product recall, the grading of passenger tires for treadwear, traction and
temperature resistance pursuant to prescribed testing procedures and the molding
of such grades into the sidewall of each tire. Passenger and highway truck tires
are required to be identified by ten-digit manufacturing identification codes
molded on the sidewall of each tire. The effect of compliance with these
regulations on Goodyear's sales and profits cannot be determined. However, these
regulations increase the cost of producing and marketing passenger tires in the
United States.


EUROPEAN UNION TIRE

Goodyear's second largest Tire Segment ("European Union Tire ")
develops, manufactures, distributes and sells tires for automobiles,
motorcycles, trucks, farm implements and construction equipment in the member
states of the European Union and in Norway and Switzerland, exports tires to
other regions of the world, and provides related products and services. European
Union Tire manufactures tires in 13 plants located in England, France, Germany
and Luxembourg. Substantially all of the operations and assets of European Union
Tire, including the Dunlop businesses acquired on September 1, 1999, are owned
and operated by Goodyear Dunlop Tires Europe B.V., a 75% owned subsidiary of
Goodyear.

The sales and operating income of European Union Tire during the
periods indicated were:

EUROPEAN UNION TIRE SALES AND OPERATING INCOME

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
(IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
European Union Tire sales .......... $3,198.1 $2,642.7 $2,139.8
European Union Tire operating income $ 88.7 $ 188.0 $ 199.7
</TABLE>

The Dunlop businesses in Europe contributed sales of approximately $1.5 billion
during 2000 and $621.1 million during the four months ended December 31, 1999 to
European Union Tire. European Union Tire sold approximately 60.3 million tires
in 2000, including 25.0 million tires contributed by the Dunlop businesses,
compared to 45.7 million tires in 1999, including 10.3 million tires contributed
by the Dunlop businesses, and 35.4 million tires in 1998.


9
12
The percentages of Goodyear's consolidated net sales and operating
income attributable to European Union Tire, and the percentages of European
Union Tire's sales attributable to new tires, for the periods indicated were:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
European Union Tire sales .......... 22.2% 19.8% 16.4%
European Union Tire operating income 14.8% 34.5% 18.9%
Tire sales ............... 96.8% 98.2% 93.0%
</TABLE>

European Union Tire:

- manufactures and sells Goodyear-brand, Dunlop-brand (since September
1, 1999), Fulda-brand and Kelly-brand passenger, truck, motorcycle,
farm and heavy equipment tires.
- sells Debica-brand and Sava-brand passenger, truck and farm tires
manufactured by the Eastern Europe, Africa and Middle East Tire
segment.
- sells new, and manufactures and sells retreaded, aircraft tires.
- provides various retreading and related services for truck and heavy
equipment tires, primarily for its commercial truck tire customers.
- offers automotive repair services at retail outlets in which it owns
a controlling interest.
- provides miscellaneous related products and services.


MARKETS AND OTHER INFORMATION

European Union Tire distributes and sells tires throughout the European
Union and in Norway and Switzerland. During 2000, European Union Tire sold
approximately 17.9 million (12.7 million during 1999 and 10.1 million during
1998) tires to OE customers and 42.4 million (33.0 million during 1999 and 25.3
million during 1998) tires in the replacement markets it serves.

During 2000, European Union Tire exported approximately 4.5% (less than
1% in 1999) of its tire production to unaffiliated customers and approximately
5.3% (7% during 1999) of its tire production to other Tire Segments, primarily
North American Tire. Approximately 20% (6.3% in 1999) of the tires sold by
European Union Tire were imported from other Tire Segments, primarily Eastern
Europe, Africa and Middle East Tire. Substantially all passenger and light and
medium truck tires sold during 2000 were radials and 47% (30% in 1999) of all
passenger tires sold were high performance type tires.

European Union Tire is a significant supplier of tires to most
manufacturers of automobiles, trucks and farm and construction equipment located
in Western Europe. Manufacturers supplied by Goodyear include DaimlerChrysler,
BMW, Fiat, Renault, Volkswagen-Audi, Volvo, Ferrari, Peugeot, Alfa Romeo,
subsidiaries of Ford and General Motors, and New Holland.

Goodyear is a leading tire manufacturer in Western Europe. Based on
data published by industry and other sources, Goodyear estimates that its share
of the Western European tire market was approximately 22% in 2000 (18% in 1999
and 15% in 1998), second in the region to Michelin's 30% (30% in 1999 and 30% in
1998) market share. Principal competitors are Michelin, Continental,
Bridgestone/Firestone and Pirelli. Other significant competitors include several
regional tire producers and imports from other regions, primarily Asia.

Goodyear-brand and Dunlop-brand tires are sold in the replacement
markets served by European Union Tire through various channels of distribution,
principally independent tire dealers who sell several brands of tires. In some
markets, Goodyear-brand tires, as well as Dunlop-brand, Kelly-brand,
Fulda-brand, Debica-brand, Sava-brand, Falken-brand and Pneumant-brand tires,
are distributed through independent dealers, regional distributors and
approximately 543 retail outlets operated by multi-brand retail tire chains
controlled by Goodyear.

No customer or group of affiliated customers accounted for as much as
5.0% of the sales of European Union Tire during 2000, 3.1% of its sales during
1999 or 2.7% of its sales during 1998.


10
13
The ten largest customers of European Union Tire represented less than 20.1% of
its sales for 2000, less than 19.3% of its sales during 1999 and less than 17.0%
of its sales during 1998. European Union Tire offers payment terms consistent
with industry practice in the region. The payment terms offered to customers in
each market served are consistent with industry practice. The inventory levels
and working capital requirements of European Union Tire are not unusual relative
to the volume of sales involved and prevailing tire industry practices in the
markets it serves.

EASTERN EUROPE, AFRICA AND MIDDLE EAST TIRE

Another Tire Segment, the Eastern Europe, Africa and Middle East tire
business ("EEAME Tire"), develops, manufactures, distributes and sells
passenger, truck, farm and construction equipment tires in Eastern Europe,
Africa and the Middle East. EEAME Tire manufactures tires at plants located in
Morocco, Poland, Slovenia, South Africa and Turkey. EEAME Tire maintains sales
operations in most countries in Eastern Europe, including Russia, Africa and the
Middle East, exports tires for sale in North America, Western Europe and other
regions of the world, and provides related products and services in certain
markets it serves.

The sales and operating income of EEAME Tire during the periods
indicated were:

EEAME SALES AND OPERATING INCOME

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
(IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
EEAME Tire sales .......... $793.0 $812.9 $867.4
EEAME Tire operating income $ 54.6 $ 49.8 $102.4
</TABLE>

EEAME Tire sold approximately 15.6 million tires in 2000, compared to 15.8
million tires in 1999 and 15.5 million tires in 1998.

The percentages of Goodyear's consolidated net sales and operating
income attributable to EEAME Tire, and the percentages of EEAME Tire's sales
attributable to new tires, for the periods indicated are:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
EEAME Tire sales .......... 5.5% 6.1% 6.6%
EEAME Tire operating income 9.1% 9.1% 9.7%
Tire sales ...... 93.4% 92.7% 95.0%
</TABLE>

EEAME Tire manufactures and sells Goodyear-brand, Kelly-brand,
Debica-brand and Sava-brand tires and sells Dunlop-brand (since September 1,
1999) and Fulda-brand tires manufactured by European Union Tire. EEAME Tire also
sells new and retreaded aircraft tires, provides various retreading and related
services for truck and heavy equipment tires, sells automotive parts and
accessories and provides automotive repair services.


MARKETS AND OTHER INFORMATION

EEAME Tire distributes and sells tires in most countries in Eastern
Europe, Africa and the Middle East. Tires are sold to all classes of customers.
During 2000, approximately 98% (98% in 1999) of the passenger and light truck
tires, and approximately 82% (77% in 1999) of all medium truck tires, sold by
EEAME Tire were radials. Approximately 16% of all passenger tires sold by EEAME
Tire during 2000 (12% during 1999) were high performance type tires.

During 2000, EEAME Tire sold approximately 3.5 million (3.2 million in
1999 and 3.2 million in 1998) tires to OE customers and 12.1 million (12.6
million in 1999 and 12.3 million in 1998) tires in the several replacement
markets it serves. EEAME Tire exported and sold approximately 3% of its 2000
tire production (5% in 1999) to unaffiliated customers located outside

11
14
Eastern Europe, Morocco, South Africa and Turkey, which customers were located
primarily in the Middle East and Africa. Approximately 54% of the tires produced
by EEAME Tire during 2000 (51% in 1999) were delivered to other Tire Segments,
primarily European Union Tire. Approximately 23% of the tires sold by EEAME Tire
during 2000 (11% in 1999) were imported from other Tire Segments.

EEAME Tire is a significant supplier of tires to manufacturers of
automobiles, trucks, and farm and construction equipment in Poland, South Africa
and Turkey. Manufacturers supplied by EEAME Tire include Fiat Auto Poland,
Daewoo Poland, VW South Africa, Fiat Turkey and Renault Turkey. EEAME Tire has a
significant share of each of the markets it serves. Its major competitors are
Michelin, Bridgestone/Firestone, Continental and Pirelli. Other competition
includes regional and local tire producers and imports from other regions,
primarily Asia.

Goodyear-brand tires in the various replacement markets served by EEAME
Tire are sold primarily through independent tire dealers and wholesalers who
sell several brands of tires. In some countries, Goodyear-brand, as well as
Dunlop-brand, Kelly-brand, Fulda-brand, Debica-brand and Sava-brand tires are
sold through regional distributors and multi-brand dealers. In South Africa,
tires are also sold through a retail chain of approximately 220 retail stores
owned by Goodyear. In the Middle East and most of Africa, tires are sold
primarily through regional distributors for resale to independent dealers.

No customer or group of affiliated customers accounted for as much as
2.8% of the sales of EEAME Tire during 2000 or as much as 3.0% in 1999 or 4.1%
in 1998. Sales to the ten largest customers of EEAME Tire represented less than
11.8% of its 2000 sales and less than 13.0% of its 1999 sales and less than
15.2% of its 1998 sales. The payment terms offered customers of EEAME in each
market it serves are consistent with industry practices. The inventory levels
and working capital requirements of EEAME Tire are not unusual relative to the
volume of sales involved and prevailing tire industry practices in the region.

LATIN AMERICAN TIRE

Another Tire Segment, the Latin American tire business ("Latin American
Tire"), manufactures, distributes and sells automobile, truck and farm tires in
Mexico and throughout Central and South America ("Latin America"), sells tires
to various export markets, retreads and sells commercial truck, aircraft and
heavy equipment tires, and provides other products and services. Latin American
Tire manufactures tires in plants located in Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Guatemala,
Mexico, Peru and Venezuela.

The sales and operating income of Latin American Tire during the
periods indicated were:

LATIN AMERICAN TIRE SALES AND OPERATING INCOME

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
(IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Latin American Tire sales .......... $1,047.9 $ 948.1 $1,269.8
Latin American Tire operating income $ 69.8 $ 67.7 $ 186.1
</TABLE>

Latin American Tire sold approximately 19.7 million tires in 2000, compared to
17.8 million tires in 1999 and 20.8 million tires in 1998.

The percentages of Goodyear's consolidated net sales and operating
income attributable to Latin American Tire, and the percentages of Latin
American Tire's sales attributable to new tires, for the periods indicated were:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Latin American Tire sales .......... 7.3% 7.1% 9.7%
Latin American Tire operating income 11.7% 12.4% 17.7%
Tire sales ............... 91.6% 89.0% 90.5%
</TABLE>


12
15
Latin American Tire manufactures and sells several lines of radial and
bias-ply passenger, light and medium truck and farm tires. Latin American Tire
also:

- manufactures and sells pre-cured treads for truck and heavy equipment
tires.
- retreads, and provides various materials and related services for
retreading, truck, aircraft and heavy equipment tires.
- manufactures other products, including batteries for motor vehicles.
- sells new aircraft tires.
- provides miscellaneous other products and services.

MARKETS AND OTHER INFORMATION

Latin American Tire distributes and sells several lines of tires for
automobiles, trucks and farm equipment throughout Latin America to original
equipment manufacturers, in the several replacement markets in the region and to
various export markets. During 2000, Latin American Tire sold approximately 4.8
million tires to OE customers (3.6 million in 1999 and 5.2 million in 1998) and
14.9 million tires in the replacement markets it serves (14.2 million in 1999
and 15.6 million in 1998). In Latin America, approximately 86% of all passenger
and light truck tires, and approximately 34% of all medium truck tires, sold by
Goodyear during 2000 were radials.

Latin American Tire is a major supplier of tires to most manufacturers
of automobiles and trucks with facilities in Latin America, including
DaimlerChrysler, Ford, General Motors, Volkswagen, Fiat and Renault. Latin
American Tire sells tires to independent dealers and distributors in the various
replacement markets in Latin America.

Goodyear is a leading participant in each of the markets served by
Latin American Tire. Major competitors in Latin America include
Bridgestone/Firestone, Michelin and Pirelli. Other competition includes various
regional producers and imports, primarily from Asia.

During 2000, Latin American Tire delivered approximately 32% (26.3% in
1999) of its tire production to other Tire Segments, primarily passenger and
truck tires to the United States, exported and sold approximately 7% (9.1% in
1999) of its tire production to unaffiliated customers outside Latin America,
and imported approximately 9% (8.3% in 1999) of the tires it sold from other
Tire Segments.

No customer or group of affiliated customers accounted for as much as
5.2% of Latin American Tire sales during 2000, as much as 6.5% of its sales
during 1999 or as much as 8.2% of its sales during 1998. The ten largest
customers of Latin American Tire represented less than 24.6% of its sales for
2000, 24.9% of its sales during 1999, and 27.5% of its sales during 1998.

The working capital employed by Latin American Tire is limited to the
extent possible to reduce the effects of inflationary economic conditions in the
region. The inventories maintained by Latin American Tire are ordinarily at
levels designed to optimize production schedules consistent with anticipated
demand. The payment terms offered to customers in each Latin American country
are consistent with industry practices. The working capital requirements of
Latin American Tire are consistent with its sales volume and industry practices
in the region.

The operations of Latin American Tire in certain countries are affected
from time to time by price controls, import controls, labor regulations,
tariffs, and other restrictive governmental regulations.


ASIA TIRE

Goodyear's tire business in Asia ("Asia Tire") engages in the
development, manufacture, distribution and sale of tires throughout east,
southeast and south Asia and the western Pacific. Asia Tire manufactures and
sells radial and bias-ply tires for automobiles, light and medium trucks, farm
implements and construction equipment for both the original equipment and
replacement markets. Asia Tire manufactures tires at facilities located in
China, India, Indonesia, Japan,


13
16
Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan and Thailand. Asia Tire also sells aircraft
tires and retreads truck, heavy equipment and aircraft tires and provides
miscellaneous other products and services.

The sales and operating income of Asia Tire during the periods
indicated were:

ASIA TIRE SALES AND OPERATING INCOME

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
(IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Asia Tire sales .......... $524.6 $593.2 $519.3
Asia Tire operating income $ 17.9 $ 26.0 $ 7.5
</TABLE>

Asia Tire sold approximately 11.8 million tires during 2000, compared to 12.0
million units during 1999. The percentages of Goodyear's consolidated net sales
and operating income attributable to Asia Tire, and the percentages of Asia
Tire's sales attributable to new tires, for the periods indicated were:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Asia Tire sales .......... 3.6% 4.4% 4.0%
Asia Tire operating income 3.0% 4.8% 0.7%
Tire sales ..... 97.3% 96.7% 96.0%
</TABLE>

MARKETS AND OTHER INFORMATION

Asia Tire distributes and sells tires in most countries in Asia and the
western Pacific. During 2000, Asia Tire sold approximately 3.0 million tires
(2.4 million during 1999 and 1.4 million during 1998) to OE customers and 8.8
million tires (9.6 million during 1999 and 9.5 million during 1998) in the
replacement markets it serves. During 2000, Asia Tire delivered approximately 7%
(10% during 1999) of its tire production to other Tire Segments, primarily North
American Tire, exported and sold approximately 1% (4% during 1999) of its tire
production to unaffiliated customers located outside the region, and imported
approximately 1% (2% during 1999) of the tires it sold from the other Tire
Segments. Approximately 86% of all passenger and light truck tires, and
approximately 3% of all medium truck tires, sold by Asia Tire during 2000 were
radials.

Asia Tire supplies tires to global automobile manufacturers with
facilities in China, India, Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines, including
BMW, Citroen, Daihatsu, DaimlerChrysler, Ford, General Motors, Honda, Hyundai,
Isuzu, Mitsubishi, Nissan, Toyota, Volkswagen and Volvo, and to regional
manufacturers, including Perodua and Proton (Malaysia), Maruti, Skoda and Telco
(India) and AAT (Thailand). In the replacement market, Asia Tire sells tires
through approximately 7,400 distributors and dealers.

Goodyear is a leading tire manufacturer in Indonesia, Malaysia and the
Philippines and a significant supplier in Thailand, India, Japan, Korea and
China. In Asia, Goodyear's principal competitors include Bridgestone, Michelin,
Yokohama, Kumho, Hankook, MRF, Ceat and several regional and local tire
companies.

No customer or group of affiliated customers accounted for as much as
3.7% of the sales of Asia Tire during 2000, 7.2% of its sales during 1999, or
10.6% of its sales during 1998. The ten largest customers of Asia Tire accounted
for less than 15.2% of its 2000 sales, less than 22.8% of its 1999 sales and
less than 31.8% of its 1998 sales. Ordinarily, the working capital requirements
of Asia Tire are low relative to the volume of sales involved and are consistent
with prevailing tire industry practices in each market it serves. During the
past two years working capital requirements have increased somewhat due to the
economic downturn in most of the region.

Asia Tire information does not include the operations of South Pacific
Tyre, an Australian Partnership, and South Pacific Tyres N.Z. Limited, a New
Zealand Company (together, "SPT"), which are joint ventures 50% owned by
Goodyear and 50% owned by Pacific Dunlop Limited.


14
17
SPT is the largest tire manufacturer in Australia and New Zealand, with four
tire manufacturing plants and 12 retread plants. In Australia and New Zealand,
SPT sells Goodyear-brand and Dunlop-brand tires through a chain of 414 retail
stores and commercial tire centers owned by SPT. For additional information
regarding SPT, see Note 20, "Business Segments", of the notes to Financial
Statements set forth in Item 8 of this Annual Report, at page 76.

Asia Tire information includes the activities of two joint venture
companies in Japan, each 25% owned by Goodyear and 75% owned by Sumitomo. One
company distributes Goodyear-brand passenger and truck tires manufactured by
Sumitomo in Japan, or by Goodyear in other countries, in the replacement market
in Japan. The other company sells Goodyear-brand and Dunlop-brand tires to
original equipment manufacturers in Japan. Goodyear's 25% share of the net
income or loss of these companies is reported as an increase or decrease to the
operating income of Asia Tire using the equity method of accounting.


ENGINEERED PRODUCTS

Another Goodyear business is the development, manufacture, distribution
and sale of numerous rubber and thermoplastic products worldwide ("Engineered
Products"). The products and services offered by Engineered Products include:

- belts and hose for motor vehicles
- air springs, engine mounts and chassis parts for motor vehicles
- conveyor and power transmission belts
- air, water, steam, hydraulic, petroleum, fuel, chemical and materials
handling hose for industrial applications
- tank tracks
- various other products and miscellaneous services

Engineered Products manufactures products at 9 plants located in the United
States and 15 plants located in Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Mexico,
Slovenia, South Africa and Venezuela.

The sales and operating income of Engineered Products for the periods
indicated were:

ENGINEERED PRODUCTS SALES AND OPERATING INCOME

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
(IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Engineered Products sales .......... $1,174.2 $1,234.8 $1,301.8
Engineered Products operating income $ 43.1 $ 70.4 $ 111.7
</TABLE>

The percentages of Goodyear's consolidated net sales and operating income
attributable to Engineered Products for periods indicated are:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Engineered Products sales .......... 8.1% 9.2% 10.0%
Engineered Products operating income 7.2% 12.9% 10.6%
</TABLE>

MARKETS AND OTHER INFORMATION

Most products of the Engineered Products segment are sold directly to
manufacturers or through independent wholesale distributors. The major portion
of Engineered Products sales is made to various industrial and transportation
markets for replacement purposes.

Engineered Products has several competitors which produce some, but not
all, of the products manufactured by Engineered Products. There are several
suppliers of automotive belts and hose products, air springs, engine mounts and
other rubber components for motor vehicles.



15
18
Goodyear is a significant supplier of these products. Goodyear also is a leading
supplier of conveyor and power transmission belts and industrial hose products.
More than 50 major firms participate in the various markets served by Engineered
Products. The principal competitors of Engineered Products include Dana, Mark
IV, Gates, Dayco, Bridgestone/Firestone, Conti-Tech, Trellberg, Tokai/DTR,
Unipoly and Habasit. These markets are highly competitive, with quality, service
and price being the most significant factors to most customers. Goodyear
believes the products offered by Engineered Products are generally considered to
be high quality and competitive in price and performance.

During 2000, the ten largest customers of Engineered Products accounted
for approximately 32.2% (41.3% in 1999 and 41.4% in 1998) of its sales and no
customer, or group of affiliated customers, accounted for more than 6.7% (11.7%
in 1999 and 13.7% in 1998) of its sales. The principal customers of Engineered
Products include DaimlerChrysler, Ford, General Motors, International Truck and
Engine, AutoZone, the Federal Government and Applied Industrial. The business of
Engineered Products is not seasonal to any significant degree. Engineered
Products does not maintain a significant inventory or require an unusual amount
of working capital when considered in relation to the volume of business
transacted.

CHEMICAL PRODUCTS

Another Goodyear business is the development, manufacture, distribution
and sale of synthetic rubber and rubber latices, various resins and organic
chemicals used in rubber and plastic processing, and other chemical products for
industrial customers worldwide ("Chemical Products"). Chemical Products owns and
operates six manufacturing facilities, a natural rubber plantation and
processing facility in Indonesia and conducts natural rubber purchasing
operations.

The sales and operating income of Chemical Products during the periods
indicated were:

CHEMICAL PRODUCTS SALES AND OPERATING INCOME

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------
(IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 2000 1999 1998
-------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Chemical Products sales .......... $1,129.7 $ 949.8 $ 993.0
Chemical Products operating income $ 64.2 $ 116.4 $ 132.7
</TABLE>

The percentages of Goodyear's consolidated net sales and operating
income attributable to Chemical Products (which includes sales and operating
income in respect of products transferred to Goodyear's other segments), and to
the sales of Chemical Products to Goodyear's other segments, for the periods
indicated were:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Chemical Products sales ......................... 7.8% 7.1% 7.6%
Chemical Products operating income .............. 10.7% 21.4% 12.6%

Chemical Products Segment sales to other Segments 3.9% 3.6% 4.0%
</TABLE>

The major portion (50.0%, 52.0% and 54.0% in 2000, 1999 and 1998,
respectively) of the revenues of Chemical Products were sales to Goodyear's
other Segments, primarily synthetic rubber and rubber processing chemicals to
North American Tire, on a formula price basis. Substantially all production is
in the United States, except for certain rubber chemicals manufactured in
France.

MARKETS AND OTHER INFORMATION

The Tire Segments purchase approximately 70% of the synthetic rubber,
and a significant portion of the rubber processing chemicals, produced by
Chemical Products. All of the natural rubber produced by Goodyear's plantation
and processing facility is used by Goodyear. All external sales of rubber
processing and other chemical products are made directly to manufacturers


16
19
of various products. Several major firms are significant suppliers of one or
more chemical products similar to those manufactured by Goodyear. The principal
competitors of Chemical Products include Bayer, Dow and Ameripol Synpol. The
markets are highly competitive, with product quality and price being the most
significant factors to most customers. Goodyear believes the products offered by
Chemical Products are generally considered to be high quality and competitive in
price and performance.

During 2000, the ten largest unaffiliated customers of Chemical
Products accounted for approximately 14.9% (12.1% in 1999 and 10.9% in 1998) of
its sales and no unaffiliated customer accounted for more than 4.1% (2.2% in
1999 and 2.0% in 1998) of its sales. The Chemical Products business is not
seasonal to any significant degree and does not require an unusual amount of
inventory or working capital relative to the volume of business transacted.

GENERAL BUSINESS INFORMATION

SOURCES AND AVAILABILITY OF RAW MATERIALS

The principal raw materials used by Goodyear are synthetic and natural
rubber. Goodyear purchases substantially all of its requirements for natural
rubber in the world market. Synthetic rubber accounted for approximately 53%,
54% and 54% of all rubber consumed by Goodyear worldwide during 2000, 1999 and
1998, respectively. The Company's plants located in Beaumont and Houston, Texas,
supply the major portion of its synthetic rubber requirements in the United
States. Substantially all of the synthetic rubber used by Goodyear outside the
United States is supplied by third parties. The principal raw materials used in
the production of synthetic rubber are butadiene and styrene purchased from
independent suppliers and isoprene purchased from independent suppliers or
produced by Goodyear from purchased materials.

Nylon and polyester yarns are used by Goodyear, substantial quantities
of which are processed in Goodyear's textile mills. Significant quantities of
steel wire are used for radial tires, a portion of which is produced by
Goodyear. Other important raw materials used by Goodyear are carbon black,
pigments, chemicals and bead wire. Substantially all of these raw materials are
purchased from independent suppliers, except for certain chemicals which
Goodyear manufactures. Goodyear purchases most of the materials and supplies it
uses in significant quantities from several suppliers, except in those instances
where only one or a few qualified sources are available. As in 2000, Goodyear
anticipates the continued availability (subject to possible spot shortages) of
all raw materials it will require during 2001.

Substantial quantities of hydrocarbon based chemicals and fuels are
used in the production of tires and other rubber products, synthetic rubber,
latex and other products. Supplies of chemicals and fuels have been and are
expected to continue to be available to Goodyear in quantities sufficient to
satisfy the anticipated requirements of its manufacturing plants, subject to
possible spot shortages.

In the aggregate, the costs of natural rubber and other raw materials
during 2000 increased approximately 8% from 1999 levels. Although natural rubber
and crude oil prices decreased slightly in the world market beginning in late
2000, the Company anticipates that the cost of energy and most raw materials,
especially materials and fuels derived from hydrocarbons, will remain at
year-end 2000 levels or increase during 2001. Prices for raw materials and fuels
are also likely to fluctuate significantly during 2001.

PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS

Goodyear owns approximately 2,029 patents issued by the United States
Patent Office and approximately 5,915 patents issued or granted in other
countries around the world. Goodyear also has licenses under numerous patents of
others, covering various improvements in the design and manufacture of its
products and in processes and equipment for the manufacture of its products.
Goodyear also has approximately 738 applications for United States Patents
pending and


17
20
approximately 4,754 patent applications on file in other countries around the
world. While such patents, patent applications and licenses as a group are of
material importance to Goodyear, it does not consider any one patent, patent
application or license, or any related group of them, to be of such importance
that the loss or expiration thereof would materially affect any Segment or the
Company considered as a whole.

Goodyear owns or controls and uses approximately 1,535 different
trademarks, including several using the word "Goodyear" or the word "Dunlop."
These trademarks are protected by approximately 8,780 registrations and 1,120
pending applications worldwide. While Goodyear believes such trademarks as a
group are of importance, the only trademarks Goodyear considers material to its
business considered as a whole or to the business of any of its Segments are
those using the word "Goodyear". Goodyear believes all of its significant
trademarks are valid and will have unlimited duration as long as they are
adequately protected and appropriately used.


BACKLOG

Goodyear does not consider its backlog of orders to be material to, or
a significant factor in, evaluating and understanding any of its Segments or its
business considered as a whole.


GOVERNMENT BUSINESS

The percentages of Goodyear's net sales under contracts or subcontracts
subject to termination at the election of the United States Government in the
years indicated were:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
0.9% 0.5% 0.6%
</TABLE>

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Goodyear expends significant amounts each year on research for the
development of new, and the improvement of existing, products and manufacturing
processes and equipment. Goodyear maintains substantial research and development
centers for tires and related products in Akron, Ohio, and Colmar-Berg,
Luxembourg; and tire proving grounds in Akron, Ohio, Huntsville, Alabama, San
Angelo, Texas, Mireval, France, and Colmar-Berg, Luxembourg. Goodyear operates
significant research and development facilities for other products in Akron,
Ohio, Green, Ohio, Lincoln, Nebraska, Marysville, Ohio, and Orsay, France.

Direct and indirect expenditures by Goodyear on research, development
and certain engineering activities relating to the design, development,
improvement and modification of new and existing products and services and the
formulation and design of new, and improvements to existing, manufacturing
processes and equipment during the periods indicated were:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Research and Development Expenditures $423.1 $438.0 $420.7 $384.1 $374.5
</TABLE>

Goodyear estimates that it will expend approximately $400.0 million for research
and development activities during 2001.


EMPLOYEES

At December 31, 2000, Goodyear employed approximately 105,128 people
throughout the world. Of the approximately 41,502 persons employed in the United
States at December 31, 2000, approximately 12,548 were covered by a master
collective bargaining agreement, dated May 9, 1997 (as supplemented in 2000),
with the United Steel Workers of America, A.F.L.-C.I.O. - C.L.C. ("USWA"), which
agreement will expire on April 19, 2003 and approximately 10,424 were cov-


18
21
ered by other contracts with the USWA and various other unions. The major
portion of employees in Europe and Latin America are represented by unions.


COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS

Goodyear is subject to extensive regulation under environmental and
occupational health and safety laws and regulations concerning, among other
things, air emissions, discharges to surface and underground waters and the
generation, handling, storage, transportation and disposal of waste materials
and hazardous substances. Goodyear has several continuing programs designed to
ensure its compliance with Federal, state and local environmental and
occupational safety and health laws and regulations.

Goodyear's expenditures relating to environmental improvement and
occupational safety and health compliance projects in respect of its facilities
worldwide during the periods indicated were:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Environmental and Occupational Safety
and Health Expenditures ........... $ 6.5 $10.4 $17.5 $16.6 $12.5
</TABLE>

Goodyear presently estimates that it will make capital expenditures for
pollution control facilities and occupational safety and health projects of
approximately $17 million during 2001 and approximately $13 million during 2002.

In addition, Goodyear expended approximately $79 million during 2000,
and Goodyear estimates that it will expend approximately $101 million during
2001 and approximately $83 million during 2002, to maintain and operate its
pollution control facilities and conduct its other environmental and
occupational safety and health activities, including the control and disposal of
hazardous substances. The Company expects that these expenditures will be
sufficient to comply with applicable existing environmental and occupational
safety and health laws and regulations and will not have a material adverse
effect on Goodyear's competitive position in the industries in which it
participates.

At December 31, 2000, Goodyear had reserved $78.3 million for
anticipated costs, including site studies, the design and implementation of
remediation plans, post-remediation monitoring and legal and consulting fees,
associated with the remediation of numerous waste disposal sites and certain
other properties and related environmental activities.

In the future Goodyear may incur increased costs and additional charges
associated with environmental compliance and cleanup projects necessitated by
the identification of new waste sites, the impact of new environmental laws and
regulatory standards and the availability of new technologies. Compliance with
Federal, State and local environmental laws and regulations in the future may
require a material increase in Goodyear's capital expenditures and may adversely
affect Goodyear's earnings and competitive position.


INFORMATION ABOUT INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS

Through subsidiaries, Goodyear engages in manufacturing or sales
operations in most countries in the world, including manufacturing operations in
the United States and 27 other countries. Most of Goodyear's international
manufacturing operations relate to the production of tires. Several engineered
rubber and chemical products, as well as certain other products, are also
manufactured in certain of Goodyear's plants located outside the United States.


19
22
Goodyear's consolidated net sales and long-lived assets were split between
the United States and all other countries as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NET SALES LONG-LIVED ASSETS
--------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL
YEAR ------------------------ ------------------------- ------------------------- --------------------------
ENDED IN MILLIONS PERCENT OF IN MILLIONS PERCENT OF AT IN MILLIONS PERCENT OF IN MILLIONS PERCENT OF
12/31 OF DOLLARS CONSOLIDATED OF DOLLARS CONSOLIDATED 12/31 OF DOLLARS CONSOLIDATED OF DOLLARS CONSOLIDATED
----- ---------- ------------ ---------- ------------ ----- ---------- ------------ ---------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
2000 $ 7,611.1 53% $ 6,806.0 47% 2000 $ 4,188.5 57% $ 3,166.3 43%
1999 $ 7,136.6 53% $ 6,218.8 47% 1999 $ 4,080.1 55% $ 3,290.2 45%
1998 $ 7,093.5 54% $ 5,988.1 46% 1998 $ 2,750.6 51% $ 2,649.5 49%
</TABLE>

Net sales to unaffiliated customers are attributed to the country where the sale
is made, without regard to where the product was manufactured or where the
product or service sold was delivered. During 2000, there was no foreign country
in which Goodyear's operations contributed more than 6.3% of Goodyear's
consolidated net sales. At December 31, 2000, there was no foreign country in
which Goodyear's operations employed more than 5.5% of Goodyear's long-lived
assets. Goodyear's operations in Brazil, Canada, England, Germany and France,
Goodyear's five largest foreign operations, contributed approximately 22.7% of
its consolidated net sales during 2000 and employed approximately 19.7% of
Goodyear long-lived assets at December 31, 2000.

SPT, a joint venture in which Goodyear has a 50% interest, operates four
tire manufacturing plants, 12 retread plants and a chain of approximately 414
retail outlets in Australia, New Zealand and Papua - New Guinea. The net sales
and operating income of SPT during the periods indicated were:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
SPT net sales $ 563.6 $ 674.5 $ 654.0
SPT operating income $ (11.1) $ 31.2 $ 47.2
</TABLE>

In addition to the ordinary risks of the marketplace, the Company's
foreign operations and the results thereof in some countries are affected by
price controls, import controls, labor regulations, tariffs, extreme inflation
and/or fluctuations in currency values. Furthermore, in certain countries where
Goodyear operates (primarily countries located in Central and South America),
transfers of funds from foreign operations are generally or periodically subject
to various restrictive governmental regulations.


20
23
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

Goodyear manufactures its products in 92 manufacturing facilities located
around the world. There are 34 plants in the United States and 58 plants in 27
other countries.

NORTH AMERICAN TIRE MANUFACTURING FACILITIES. Goodyear owns (or leases
with the right to purchase at a nominal price) and operates 23 manufacturing
facilities used by North American Tire, which facilities have an aggregate of
approximately 24.3 million square feet of floor space. North American Tire
operates 11 tire plants, one steel tire wire cord plant, two tire mold plants,
three textile mills and three tread rubber plants in the United States and three
tire plants in Canada.

EUROPEAN UNION TIRE MANUFACTURING FACILITIES. Goodyear owns 13 tire
manufacturing facilities operated by European Union Tire, which facilities have
an aggregate of approximately 13.9 million square feet of floor space. The Tire
plants are located at:

- Amiens (2 plants) and Montlucon, France
- Fulda, Furstenwalde, Hanau, Philippsburg, Reisa and Wittlich,
Germany
- Birmingham, Washington and Wolverhampton, Great Britain
- Colmar-Berg, Luxembourg

In addition, the Company owns two plants at Colmar-Berg, Luxembourg, for the
manufacture of tire fabric, steel wire tire cord, tire molds and tire
manufacturing machines.

EASTERN EUROPE, AFRICA AND MIDDLE EAST TIRE MANUFACTURING FACILITIES.
Goodyear owns six tire plants operated by EEAME Tire, which facilities have an
aggregate of approximately 6.9 million square feet of floor space. The
facilities are located at:

- Casablanca, Morocco - Uitenhage, South Africa
- Debica, Poland - Adapazari and Ismit, Turkey
- Kranj, Slovenia


LATIN AMERICAN TIRE MANUFACTURING FACILITIES. Goodyear owns eight tire
plants operated by Latin American Tire, which facilities have an aggregate of
approximately 7.1 million square feet of floor space. The facilities are located
at:

- Americana and Sao Paulo, Brazil - Mexico City, Mexico
- Santiago, Chile - Lima, Peru and
- Cali, Colombia - Valencia, Venezuela
- Guatemala City, Guatemala

In addition, Goodyear manufactures tread rubber and tire molds in Brazil and
batteries in Chile.


ASIA TIRE MANUFACTURING FACILITIES. Goodyear owns (or has long term land
use rights to) ten tire plants operated by Asia Tire, which facilities have an
aggregate of approximately 5.4 million square feet of floor space. The
facilities are located at:

- Dalian, China - Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Aurangabad and Ballabgarh, India - Las Pinas and Marikina,
- Bogor, Indonesia Philippines
- Tatsuno, Japan - Taipei, Taiwan
- Bangkok, Thailand

ENGINEERED PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING FACILITIES. Goodyear owns (or leases
with the right to purchase at a nominal price) 24 facilities at 9 United States
and 15 international locations operated by Engineered Products, which have an
aggregate of approximately 5.2 million square feet of floor space. Certain
facilities manufacture more than one group of products. The facilities include:


21
24
In the United States and Canada -

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
- six hose products plants - two molded rubber products plants
- three conveyor belting plants - two power transmission products plants
- one air springs plant

In Europe - In Asia -

- two air springs plants - one conveyor belting plant
- one power transmission products plant - one hose products plant

In Latin America -

- two air springs plants - three power transmission products plants
- five hose products plants - two conveyor belting plants
</TABLE>

In Africa - - one conveyor belting and power transmission products plant

CHEMICAL PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING FACILITIES. The Company owns six
manufacturing facilities operated by Chemical Products having an aggregate of
approximately 2.2 million square feet of floor space. The facilities are located
in the United States (5) and France (1) and consist of:

- two synthetic rubber and rubber chemicals plants
- two specialty resins plants
- two rubber chemicals plants

CAPITAL EXPENDITURES. The manufacturing facilities of Goodyear are, when
considered in the aggregate, modern and adequately maintained. Goodyear's
capital expenditures for new plant and equipment, for expansion and
modernization of existing plants and equipment and related assets, for tire
molds, and for various other projects (excluding the cost of any acquisitions of
new businesses) for the periods indicated were:


CAPITAL EXPENDITURES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------
(IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
U.S .................... $ 347.8 $ 483.4 $ 447.7
International .......... $ 266.7 $ 321.6 $ 390.7
------- ------- -------
Total ......... $ 614.5 $ 805.0 $ 838.4
</TABLE>

Capital expenditures used on projects to increase capacity and improve
productivity totaled $330.4 million in 2000, $410.7 million in 1999, and $365.1
million in 1998. The Company estimates that its capital expenditures during 2001
will total approximately $550 million to $600 million, of which amount
approximately $300 million to $350 million will be expended on projects to
increase the capacity and improve the productivity of existing facilities.

PLANT UTILIZATION. Goodyear's worldwide tire capacity utilization rate was
approximately 95% during 2000, compared to approximately 92% during 1999 and 91%
during 1998. Lower levels of capacity utilization by the tire industry during
2001 are anticipated based on current demand levels and announced and
anticipated reductions in production levels by original equipment manufacturers
in the United States and Europe.

The manufacturing facilities used by Engineered Products were operated at
approximately 70% of capacity during 2000, compared to approximately 69% in 1999
and 76% in 1998. The manufacturing facilities used by Chemical Products were
operated at approximately 88% of rated capacity during 2000, compared to 86% in
1999 and 90% in 1998.


22
25
In order to maintain its competitive position, respond to changing market
conditions and optimize production efficiencies, Goodyear has a continuing
program for rationalizing production, eliminating inefficient capacity and
modernizing and increasing the capacity of its radial passenger and truck tire
facilities. In addition, since 1996 Goodyear has acquired additional tire
manufacturing capacity in various markets, including India, the Philippines,
Poland, Slovenia and South Africa, and, in the global alliance with Sumitomo, in
the United States, England, France and Germany. During 2000, Goodyear closed its
tire plants in Italy and the major portion of the Dunlop tire plant in
Birmingham, England, and will close a tire plant in Latin America in 2001.
Goodyear expects that its manufacturing facilities will have production capacity
sufficient to satisfy presently anticipated demand for its tires and other
products for the foreseeable future.

OTHER FACILITIES. Goodyear also owns and operates a rubber plantation
processing facility in Indonesia, and research and development facilities and
technical centers in Akron, Ohio, Colmar-Berg, Luxembourg, Lincoln, Nebraska,
Green, Ohio, Marysville, Ohio, and Orsay, France and tire proving grounds in
Akron, Ohio (82 acres), Colmar-Berg, Luxembourg (95 acres), Huntsville, Alabama
(26 acres), Mireval, France (450 acres), and San Angelo, Texas (7,243 acres).

Goodyear operates approximately 1,091 retail outlets for the sale of its
tires to consumers in the United States and Canada and approximately 774 retail
outlets in other countries. Worldwide, Goodyear operates approximately 129 tire
retreading facilities and approximately 242 warehouse and distribution
facilities. Substantially all of these facilities are leased. The Company does
not consider any one of these leased properties to be material to its
operations. For additional information regarding leased properties, see Note 9,
"Properties and Plants," and Note 10, "Leased Assets," of the Notes to Financial
Statements set forth in Item 8 of this Annual Report at page 66.


ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

At February 28, 2001, Goodyear was a party to the following material legal
proceedings, as defined in the Instructions to Item 103 of Regulation S-K:

(A) Since January 19, 1990, a series of 66 civil actions have been filed
against Registrant in the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland relating to the development of lung disease, cancer and other diseases
by former employees of The Kelly-Springfield Tire Company ("Kelly"), formerly a
wholly-owned subsidiary (and now a part) of Registrant, alleged to be the result
of exposure to allegedly toxic substances, including asbestos and certain
chemicals, while working at the Cumberland, Maryland tire plant of Kelly, which
was closed in 1987. The plaintiffs allege, among other things, that Registrant,
as the manufacturer or seller of certain materials, negligently failed to warn
Kelly employees of the health risks associated with their employment at the
Cumberland plant and failed to implement procedures to preserve their health and
safety. The plaintiffs in these civil actions are seeking an aggregate of $650
million in compensatory damages and $6.46 billion in punitive damages. On March
5, 1997, the District Court granted Registrant's motion for summary judgment and
issued an Order and Judgment dismissing all of these civil actions with
prejudice. The plaintiffs appealed and, on May 11, 1998, the United States Court
of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit vacated the judgment of the District Court and
remanded the cases for further proceedings. On January 28, 1999, the District
Court granted Registrant's motion for summary judgment on causation and issued
an order and judgment, dismissing each case with prejudice and assessing costs
to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs again appealed and, on July 27, 2000, the
Court of Appeals vacated the judgment of the District Court and remanded the
cases for further proceedings and instructed the District Court to consider
whether the plaintiffs are entitled to limited additional discovery. On December
21, 2000, the District Court reaffirmed its opinion and again Registrant's
motion for summary judgment and issued an order and final judgment in favor of
Registrant, dismissing each case with prejudice and assessing costs against the
plaintiffs.


23
26
(B) On June 7, 1990, a civil action, Teresa Boggs, et al. v. Divested
Atomic Corporation, et al., was filed in United States District Court for the
Southern District of Ohio by Teresa Boggs and certain other named Plaintiffs on
behalf of themselves and a putative class comprised of certain other persons who
resided near the Portsmouth Uranium Enrichment Complex, a facility owned by the
United States Department of Energy ("DOE") located in Pike County, Ohio (the
"Portsmouth DOE Plant"), against Divested Atomic Corporation ("DAC"), the
successor by merger of Goodyear Atomic Corporation ("GAC"), Registrant and
Lockheed Martin Energy Systems ("LMES"). GAC operated the Portsmouth DOE Plant
for several years pursuant to a series of contracts with the DOE until LMES
assumed operation of the Portsmouth DOE Plant on November 16, 1986. The
Plaintiffs allege that the operators of the Portsmouth DOE Plant contaminated
certain areas near the Portsmouth DOE Plant with radioactive and/or other
hazardous materials causing property damage and emotional distress. Plaintiffs
are claiming $300 million in compensatory damages, $300 million in punitive
damages and unspecified amounts for medical monitoring and cleanup costs. This
civil action is no longer a class action as a result of rulings of the District
Court decertifying the class. On June 8, 1998, a new civil action, Adkins, et
al. v. Divested Atomic Corporation, et al. (Case No. C2 98-595), was filed in
the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern
Division, on behalf of approximately 276 persons who currently reside, or in the
past resided, near the Portsmouth DOE Plant against DAC, Registrant and LMES.
The plaintiffs allege, on behalf of themselves and a putative class of all
persons who were residents, property owners or lessees of property subject to
alleged windborne particulates and water run off from the Portsmouth DOE Plant,
that DAC (and, therefore, Registrant) and LMES in their operation of the
Portsmouth DOE Plant (i) negligently contaminated, and are strictly liable for
contaminating, the plaintiffs and their property with allegedly toxic
substances, (ii) have in the past maintained, and are continuing to maintain, a
private nuisance, (iii) have committed, and continue to commit, trespass, and
(iv) violated the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act of 1980. The plaintiffs are seeking $30 million in actual damages,
$300 million of punitive damages, other unspecified legal and equitable
remedies, costs, expenses and attorney's fees.

(C) On January 13, 1995, a civil action, Gregory Tire, et al. v. Goodyear,
et al. (Cause No. 95-00409), was filed in the 192nd Judicial District Court,
Dallas County, Texas, against Registrant and two of its employees by 22
independent tire dealers or franchisees located in Texas who are or were
customers of Registrant. The complaint alleges, among other things, that in the
course of Registrant's commercial relationships and dealings with the
plaintiffs, Registrant violated the Texas Business Opportunities Act and the
Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, breached its fiduciary duty to the
plaintiffs, breached its covenants of good faith and fair dealing with the
plaintiffs, violated the Texas Free Enterprise Act, violated the Texas Antitrust
Act, breached certain contracts with the plaintiffs and committed common law
fraud. In 1998, plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed the claim that Registrant
violated the Texas Antitrust Act. In February 1999, on Registrant's motion, the
Court issued an order dismissing with prejudice all of the claims of two of the
plaintiffs and the claim of the remaining plaintiffs that Registrant breached
its fiduciary duty to them. The twenty remaining plaintiffs are seeking
unspecified compensatory damages, exemplary damages equal to the greater of $230
million or 10% of Registrant's net worth, and injunctive and other relief.

(D) On March 15, 1995, a civil action, Orion Tire Corporation, et al. vs.
Goodyear, et al. (Cause No. SA CV 95-221), was filed in the United States
District Court for the Central District of California, against Registrant,
Goodyear International Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Registrant
("GIC"), and five individuals, including Samir G. Gibara, Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer of Registrant, by Orion Tire Corporation ("Orion"),
China Tire Holdings Limited ("China Tire"), and China Strategic Holdings Limited
("China Strategic"). The plaintiffs allege, among other things, that in
connection with Registrant's 1994 acquisition of a 75% interest in a tire
manufacturing facility (the "Dalian Facility") in Dalian, People's Republic of
China, Registrant and GIC engaged in tortious interference with certain alleged
contractual relationships of plaintiffs involving the Dalian Facility, committed
tortious interference with certain prospective economic advantages of the
plaintiffs, and committed trade libel and defamation by making oral


24
27
defamatory and written libelous statements concerning the plaintiffs to various
parties. In addition, the defendants are alleged to have engaged in a civil
conspiracy to induce the entities which owned the Dalian Facility to breach
their contracts with the plaintiffs and to have engaged in civil racketeering.
The plaintiffs claim more than $1.0 billion in actual damages and $3.0 billion
in exemplary damages from Registrant and GIC and such further relief as the
court may deem appropriate. On motions made by Registrant, the District Court
dismissed all individual defendants from the proceedings for lack of
jurisdiction, dismissed all claims made by China Strategic and most of the
claims made by Orion and China Tire, and, on August 12, 1999, entered an order
dismissing the entire cause of action. On September 9, 1999, the plaintiffs
appealed the order of the District Court to the United States Court of Appeals
for the Ninth Circuit.

(E) In January of 1997, Registrant filed a civil action, Goodyear v.
Chiles Power Supply Inc., case number 5:97CV0335, in the United States District
Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, against Chiles Power
Supply Inc. ("Heatway") seeking (a) to collect approximately $2.0 million for
Entran III hose sold to Heatway and (b) to obtain a declaratory judgment in
respect of Entran II hose sold to Heatway. Heatway counterclaimed for damages
allegedly in excess of $2.0 billion, claiming, among other things, that the
Entran II hose did not comply with the implied warranty of merchantability.
Following a trial, the jury rendered its verdict in favor of Registrant, finding
that Registrant did not breach the implied warranty of merchantability in
respect of the 25 million feet of Entran II hose sold to Heatway. On February 4,
2000, the Court entered its order terminating and dismissing all of the
counterclaims of Heatway and entering a judgment against Heatway for $2.07
million, plus interest and costs. On February 25, 2000, Heatway filed a
voluntary petition (under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code) in the United
States Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Missouri. The following actions
also relate to Entran II hose used in Heatway systems. (1) In November 1998, a
class action complaint was filed in the District Court of Eagle County, Colorado
(Anderson, et al. v. Goodyear, et al., case number 98CV439), on behalf of a
putative class consisting of all persons who have or have had an ownership
interest in real property located in Colorado in which Heatway heating systems
using Entran II hose had been installed. These plaintiffs claim, among other
things, breach of express warranties, breach of implied warranties of
merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, negligence and strict
liability for defective product against both Heatway and Registrant. In July
2000, the court denied class certification. In December 2000, the plaintiffs
moved to amend their complaint and requested the court to reconsider its denial
of class certification. (2) On January 26, 2001, a demand letter was sent to
Registrant on behalf of several named claimants and a putative class consisting
of all persons in Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island
and Vermont who have Entran II hose in Heatway radiant floor heating systems
installed in their homes to recover damages incident to their use of Entran II
hose in a Heatway system. The demand letter asserts that the Entran II hose was
defective, that Registrant, knowing it was defective, did not take steps to
remedy the defects or to warn users of its defects. The claimants are demanding
that Registrant establish a $250 million fund to be administered by the United
States District Court for Massachusetts from which will be paid to the class
members: (i) the cost of replacing Entran II hose, (ii) compensation for damages
incurred to the claimant's property, and (iii) compensation for diminution of
the value of the claimant's homes. (3) On February 15, 2001, Registrant received
a class action complaint, Jane Bates, et al. vs Goodyear, case No.
D-0101-CV-2001-359, in the First Judicial District Court, Santa Fe County, New
Mexico, filed on behalf of two homeowners individually and as representation of
a putative class of similarly situated homeowners in New Mexico alleging, among
other things, that Entran II hose used in the Heatway heating systems installed
in their homes is defective and unfit for that purpose and seeking unspecified
damages to include, among other things, punitive and treble damages. (4) There
are 20 other civil actions involving 47 homesites pending in various Federal and
state courts relating to alleged defects in Entran II hose used in Heatway
Systems. (5) On October 23, 2000 the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Colorado, in a case brought by Lexington Insurance Company
seeking to recover amounts it paid to approximately 51 homeowners that suffered
property damage due to failures of Heatway systems installed in their homes,
granted Registrant's motion for summary


25
28
judgment dismissing Lexington's claim that it was entitled, as a subrogee, to
recover from Registrant amounts paid to homeowners for property damage claims
under insurance policies.

(F) Since November 14, 2000, four class action complaints for damages and
equitable relief have been filed against Goodyear: Julie Harper et al. vs.
Goodyear et al., Circuit Court No. 18, 3rd Judicial Circuit, Madison County,
Illinois, Civil Action No. 00L1154; Ronald Reusch et al. vs. Goodyear et al.,
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, Case No.
00-C-1562; Kim Adkins et al. vs. Goodyear et al., United States District Court
for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, Civil Action No.
C-1-01-0017; and Ryan J. Adkins et al. vs. Goodyear et al., United States
District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, Civil Action No.
5:01CV5. In each case the plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and a putative
class alleged to consist of all persons nationwide (other than claimants for
personal injury or wrongful death) who own, or lease vehicles on which are
mounted, specified types of Goodyear-brand, Kelly-brand and certain house-brand
load range E and load range D light truck and recreational vehicle tires. The
plaintiffs allege, among other things, that (i) Goodyear engaged in a "silent
recall" of the specified types of load range D and E tires, thereby committing
an unfair and deceptive trade practice, (ii) the specified types of tires did
not conform to the express and implied warranties of merchantability, and (iii)
Goodyear was negligent in the design and manufacture of the specified type
tires. Plaintiffs are seeking actual damages, costs of suit, reasonable
attorneys' fees, prejudgment interest, punitive or exemplary damages, a court
supervised recall and repair or replacement program, and a public awareness
campaign to alert the public to any defects in the specified types of tires.

(G) On December 1, 2000, the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration gave Goodyear notice that it is conducting a preliminary
evaluation of alleged failures of Goodyear's load range E light truck tires. The
investigation relates to belt separations of all types and blowouts of load
range E tires. Goodyear is cooperating fully with the NHTSA investigation.

(H) Goodyear is currently one of several (usually in excess of 75)
defendants in approximately 44,000 civil actions, involving approximately 75,000
claimants, in the state courts of New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Michigan,
Ohio, Florida and Texas and certain Federal courts relating to the plaintiffs'
alleged exposure to materials containing asbestos. It is expected that in a
majority of these cases there will be no evidence of exposure to items
containing asbestos produced by Goodyear. Goodyear manufactured, among other
things, rubber coated asbestos sheet gasket materials from 1914 though 1969 and
aircraft brake assemblies containing asbestos materials prior to 1985. Some of
the claims relate to independent contractors who allege exposure to asbestos
while working at certain Goodyear facilities. The plaintiffs allege various
respiratory diseases resulting from exposure to asbestos, including in some
cases lung cancer and mesothelioma. The plaintiffs are seeking actual and
punitive damages and other relief.

(I) In addition to the legal proceedings described above, various other
legal actions, claims and governmental investigations and proceedings covering a
wide range of matters were pending against Registrant and its subsidiaries at
February 28, 2001, including claims and proceedings relating to several waste
disposal sites that have been identified by the United States Environmental
Protection Agency and similar agencies of various States for remedial
investigation and cleanup, which sites were allegedly used by Goodyear in the
past for the disposal of industrial waste materials. Registrant, based on
available information, does not consider any such action, claim, investigation
or proceeding to be material, within the meaning of that term as used in Item
103 of Regulation S-K and the instructions thereto.

Registrant, based on available information, has determined with respect to
each legal proceeding pending against Registrant and its subsidiaries at
February 28, 2001, either that it is not reasonably possible that Goodyear has
incurred liability in respect thereof or that any liability ultimately incurred
will not exceed the amount, if any, recorded in respect of such proceeding at
December 31, 2000, by an amount which would be material relative to the
consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity of Goodyear,
although, in the event of an unanticipated adverse final determination in
respect of certain proceedings, Goodyear's consolidated net income for the
period during which such determination occurs could be materially affected.


26
29
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

No matter was submitted to a vote of the security holders of the
Registrant during the quarter ended December 31, 2000.



ITEM 4(A). EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF REGISTRANT.

Set forth below are: (1) the names and ages of all executive officers
(including executive officers who are also directors) of the Registrant at
February 28, 2001, (2) all positions with the Registrant presently held by each
such person and (3) the positions held by, and principal areas of responsibility
of, each such person during the last five years.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME POSITION(S) HELD AGE
------- ------------------ -----
<S> <C> <C>
SAMIR G. GIBARA CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 61
AND A DIRECTOR
</TABLE>

Mr. Gibara served in various managerial capacities after joining Goodyear
in 1966. Mr. Gibara was elected President and Chief Operating Officer of
Registrant effective April 15, 1995, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Registrant effective January 1, 1996, and Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer and President effective July 1, 1996. Mr. Gibara has served as Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer since October 3, 2000. He is the
principal executive officer of Registrant. Mr. Gibara has been a director of
Registrant since April 15, 1995.

<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
ROBERT J. KEEGAN PRESIDENT AND CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER 53
AND A DIRECTOR
</TABLE>

Mr. Keegan joined Goodyear on October 1, 2000. He was elected President
and Chief Operating Officer and a Director of Registrant on October 3, 2000.
Except for a two year period beginning in 1995, when Mr. Keegan was an executive
vice president of Avery Dennison Corporation, Mr. Keegan held various marketing,
finance and managerial positions at Eastman Kodak Company from 1972 through
September 2000. He was president of Kodak Professional and a corporate vice
president from July of 1997 to October 1998, when he was appointed President of
Consumer Imaging and elected a Senior Vice President of Eastman Kodak Company.
He served as an Executive Vice President of Eastman Kodak Company from July 2000
to September 2000. Mr. Keegan is the Chief Operating Officer of Registrant.

<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
JOHN POLHEMUS PRESIDENT, NORTH AMERICAN TIRE 56
</TABLE>

Mr. Polhemus served in various managerial positions in Goodyear's
international operations until April 10, 1995, when he was appointed, and on
November 5, 1996 elected, a Vice President of Registrant for the Latin America
region, serving as the executive officer of Registrant responsible for
Goodyear's tire operations in Latin America. Effective July 1, 1999, Mr.
Polhemus was appointed, and on August 3, 1999 he was elected, President, Latin
American Region, of Registrant. On August 1, 2000, Mr. Polhemus was elected
President, North American Tire. Mr. Polhemus is the executive officer of
Registrant responsible for Goodyear's tire operations in the United States and
Canada. Mr. Polhemus has been an employee of Goodyear since 1969.

<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
SYLVAIN G. VALENSI PRESIDENT, EUROPEAN UNION TIRE 58
</TABLE>

Mr. Valensi served in various finance, sales and marketing and managerial
positions until February 1, 1996, when he was appointed Vice President, European
Region. On November 5, 1996, Mr. Valensi was elected a Vice President of
Registrant and, in that capacity, served as the executive officer of Registrant
responsible for Goodyear's tire operations in Europe, Africa and the Middle
East. Effective July 1, 1999, Mr. Valensi was appointed, and on August 3, 1999
he was elected, President, European Union Tire, of Registrant. Mr. Valensi is
the executive officer of Registrant responsible for Goodyear's tire operations
throughout Western Europe. Mr. Valensi has been an employee of Goodyear since
1965.


27
30
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME POSITION(S) HELD AGE
------- ------------------ -----
<S> <C> <C>
MICHAEL J. RONEY PRESIDENT, EASTERN EUROPE, 46
AFRICA AND MIDDLE EAST
</TABLE>

Mr. Roney served in various international financial, sales and managerial
posts until May, 1995, when he was appointed managing director of Goodyear do
Brazil Produtos de Borracha Ltda, a subsidiary of Registrant operating in
Brazil, a post he held until September 1, 1998, when he was appointed Vice
President for the Asia Region, in which capacity he was responsible for
Goodyear's tire operations in the Asia, Australia and western Pacific regions.
On December 1, 1998, Mr. Roney was appointed President and Managing Director of
Compania Hulera Goodyear-Oxo, S.A. de C.V., a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Registrant, and was responsible for Goodyear's tire operations in Mexico.
Effective July 1, 1999, Mr. Roney was appointed, and on August 3, 1999 he was
elected, President, Eastern Europe, Africa and Middle East, of Registrant. Mr.
Roney is the executive officer of Registrant responsible for Goodyear's tire
operations in eastern Europe, Africa and the Middle East. Mr. Roney has been an
employee of Goodyear since 1981.

<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
CHRISTOPHER W. CLARK PRESIDENT, LATIN AMERICAN REGION 49
</TABLE>

Mr. Clark served in various financial posts until September 1, 1993, when
he was appointed Finance Director, Latin American Region. He was managing
director of P. T. Goodyear Indonesia Tbk, a subsidiary of Registrant, from
October 1, 1996 to September 1, 1998, when he was appointed Managing Director of
Goodyear do Brasil Produtos de Borracha Ltda, a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Registrant. On August 1, 2000 he was elected, President, Latin American Region,
of Registrant. Mr. Clark is the executive officer of Registrant responsible for
Goodyear's tire operations in Mexico, Central America and South America. Mr.
Clark has been an employee of Goodyear since 1973.

<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
HUGH D. PACE PRESIDENT, ASIA REGION 48
</TABLE>

Mr. Pace served in various international sales and marketing posts until
1992, when he became President and Managing Director of Compania Hulera Goodyear
- - Oxo, S.A. de C.V., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Registrant. Effective December
1, 1998, Mr. Pace was elected a Vice President of Registrant, serving as the
executive officer of Registrant responsible for Goodyear's tire operations in
the Asia, Australia and western Pacific regions. Effective July 1, 1999, Mr.
Pace was appointed, and on August 3, 1999 he was elected, President, Asia
Region, of Registrant. Mr. Pace is the executive officer of Registrant
responsible for Goodyear's tire operations in Asia, Australia and the western
Pacific. Mr. Pace has been an employee of Goodyear since 1975.

<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
OTTAVIO J. MALLAMACI PRESIDENT, ENGINEERED PRODUCTS 58
</TABLE>

Mr. Mallamaci served in various engineering, production and managerial
posts in Goodyear's Engineered Products and Chemical Divisions until June 1,
1993, when he was appointed Director of Product Supply for Goodyear's Chemical
Division. He was appointed General Manager of the Company's Chemical Division on
June 1, 1999. Mr. Mallamaci was elected President, Engineered Products, of
Registrant on August 1, 2000. He is the executive officer of Registrant
responsible for Goodyear's Engineered Products operations worldwide. Mr.
Mallamaci has been an employee of Goodyear since 1969.

<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
TIMOTHY R. TOPPEN PRESIDENT, CHEMICAL DIVISION 45
</TABLE>

Mr. Toppen served in various research, technology and marketing posts
until May 1, 1995, when he was appointed Marketing Manager for the Chemical
Division. He was appointed Director of Research and Development for Engineered
Products on April 1, 1997. Mr. Toppen was elected President, Chemical Division,
of Registrant on August 1, 2000. Mr. Toppen is the executive officer of
Registrant responsible for Goodyear's Chemical Products operations worldwide.
Mr. Toppen has been an employee of Goodyear since 1978.


28
31
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME POSITION(S) HELD AGE
------- ------------------ -----
<S> <C> <C>
ROBERT W. TIEKEN EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT 61
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
</TABLE>

Mr. Tieken joined Goodyear on May 3, 1994, when he was elected an
Executive Vice President and the Chief Financial Officer of Registrant. Mr.
Tieken was the Vice President of Finance of Martin Marietta Corporation from
April 1993 through April 1994. Mr. Tieken was Vice President, Finance and
Information Technology, of General Electric Aerospace from 1988 through April
1993, when it was acquired by Martin Marietta Corporation. Mr. Tieken is the
principal financial officer of Registrant.

<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
VERNON L. DUNCKEL SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, 62
GLOBAL PRODUCT SUPPLY
</TABLE>

Mr. Dunckel served in various quality assurance, production and managerial
posts in the United States and Canada until October 1992, when he was appointed
Director of Tire Manufacturing - Europe, serving in that capacity until June 30,
1999. Effective July 1, 1999, Mr. Dunckel was appointed, and on August 3, 1999
he was elected, Senior Vice President, Global Product Supply, of Registrant. Mr.
Dunckel is the executive officer of Registrant responsible for Goodyear's
facilities planning, purchasing, manufacturing and engineering applications
activities worldwide. Mr. Dunckel has been an employee of Goodyear since 1962.

<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
JOSEPH M. GINGO SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, 56
TECHNOLOGY AND GLOBAL PRODUCTS PLANNING
</TABLE>

Mr. Gingo served in various research and development and managerial posts
until January 1, 1995, when he was appointed Vice President, Asia Region. On
November 5, 1996, Mr. Gingo was elected a Vice President of Registrant and, in
that capacity, was responsible for Goodyear's operations in Asia, Australia and
the western Pacific until September 1, 1998, when he was placed on special
assignment to the Chairman of the Board. From December 1, 1998 to June 30, 1999,
Mr. Gingo served as the Vice President of Registrant responsible for Goodyear's
worldwide Engineered Products operations. Effective July 1, 1999, Mr. Gingo was
appointed, and on August 3, 1999 he was elected, Senior Vice President,
Technology and Global Products Planning, of Registrant. Mr. Gingo is the
executive officer of Registrant responsible for Goodyear's research and tire
technology development and product planning operations worldwide and for
Goodyear's global aviation and off-the-road tire businesses. Mr. Gingo has been
an employee of Goodyear since 1966.

<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
C. THOMAS HARVIE SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, GENERAL COUNSEL 57
AND SECRETARY
</TABLE>

Mr. Harvie joined Goodyear on July 1, 1995, when he was elected a Vice
President and the General Counsel of Registrant. Effective July 1, 1999, Mr.
Harvie was appointed, and on August 3, 1999 he was elected, Senior Vice
President and General Counsel of Registrant. He was elected Senior Vice
President, Secretary and General Counsel effective June 16, 2000. Mr. Harvie is
the chief legal officer of Registrant and is the executive officer of Registrant
responsible for the government relations and real estate activities of Goodyear.
Prior to joining Goodyear, Mr. Harvie was a Vice President and the Associate
General Counsel of TRW Inc. from 1989 through June 1995.

<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
JOHN P. PERDUYN SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, 61
GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS
</TABLE>

Mr. Perduyn served in various public relations posts until he was elected
a Vice President of Registrant effective June 1, 1989, serving in that capacity
as the executive officer of Registrant responsible for Goodyear's public affairs
activities. Effective July 1, 1999, Mr. Perduyn was appointed, and on August 3,
1999 he was elected, Senior Vice President, Global Communications, of
Registrant. Mr. Perduyn is responsible for Goodyear's public relations and
related activities worldwide. Mr. Perduyn has been an employee of Goodyear since
1970.


29
32
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME POSITION(S) HELD AGE
------- ------------------ -----
<S> <C> <C>
CLARK E. SPRANG SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, 58
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT AND INTEGRATION
</TABLE>

Mr. Sprang served in various financial posts until appointed Vice
President Business Development effective September 1, 1993. Mr. Sprang was
elected a Vice President of Registrant on November 5, 1996 and served as the
executive officer of Registrant responsible for Goodyear's worldwide business
development activities until June 30, 1999. Effective July 1, 1999, Mr. Sprang
was appointed, and on August 3, 1999 he was elected, Senior Vice President,
Business Development and Business Integration, of Registrant. Mr. Sprang is the
executive officer of Registrant responsible for Goodyear's business development,
business integration and related activities worldwide. Mr. Sprang has been an
employee of Goodyear since 1966.

<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
W. JAMES FISH SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, 57
GLOBAL HUMAN RESOURCES
</TABLE>

Mr. Fish joined Goodyear on February 1, 2000. He was elected Senior Vice
President, Global Human Resources, of Registrant on February 8, 2000. He is the
executive officer of Registrant responsible for Goodyear's global human
resources activities. Prior to joining Goodyear, Mr. Fish was Executive
Director, Corporate Human Resources at Ford Motor Company from 1994 to 1996. He
served as the Executive Director, Human Resources Customer Operations, of Ford
Motor Company from 1996 to October 1999 and as Senior Vice President for Human
Resources of Collins & Aikman from November 1999 to January 2000.

<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
STEPHANIE W. BERGERON VICE PRESIDENT AND TREASURER 47
</TABLE>

Ms. Bergeron joined Goodyear on December 29, 1998 and was elected Vice
President and Treasurer of Registrant effective January 1, 1999. Ms. Bergeron is
the executive officer responsible for Goodyear's worldwide treasury operations,
investor relations activities, risk management programs and pension assets
management. Prior to joining Goodyear, Ms. Bergeron was Vice President and
Assistant Treasurer - Corporate Finance of DaimlerChrysler Corporation, serving
in that position beginning November of 1994. She was Finance Director, Corporate
Financial Activities, of Chrysler Corporation from 1993 to November 1994.

<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
DONALD D. HARPER VICE PRESIDENT 54
</TABLE>

Mr. Harper served in various organizational effectiveness and human
resources posts until December 1, 1994, when he was appointed Director of Human
Resources for North American Tire. In June 1996, Mr. Harper was appointed Vice
President of Human Resources Planning, Development and Change. Mr. Harper was
elected a Vice President effective December 1, 1998 and is the executive officer
responsible for Goodyear's human resources planning and development. Mr. Harper
has been an employee of Goodyear since 1968.

<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
WILLIAM M. HOPKINS VICE PRESIDENT 56
</TABLE>

Mr. Hopkins served in various tire technology and managerial posts until
appointed General Manager of Multipurpose Vehicle and Specialty Tires in January
of 1993. Mr. Hopkins was appointed Director of Tire Technology for North
American Tires effective June 1, 1996. He was elected a Vice President of
Registrant effective May 19, 1998 and, in that capacity, served as the executive
officer of Registrant responsible for Goodyear's worldwide tire technology
activities until August 1, 1999. Since August 1, 1999, Mr. Hopkins has served as
the executive officer of Registrant primarily responsible for Goodyear's
worldwide product marketing and technology planning activities. Mr. Hopkins has
been an employee of Goodyear since 1967.


30
33
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME POSITION(S) HELD AGE
------- ------------------ -----
<S> <C> <C>
GARY A. MILLER VICE PRESIDENT 54
</TABLE>

Mr. Miller served in various management and research and development posts
until he was elected a Vice President of Registrant effective November 1, 1992.
He is the executive officer of Registrant primarily responsible for Goodyear's
purchasing operations worldwide. Mr. Miller has been an employee of Goodyear
since 1967.

<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
JOHN W. RICHARDSON VICE PRESIDENT 55
</TABLE>

Mr. Richardson served in various financial and general management posts
until he was appointed General Auditor of Goodyear on February 1, 1993, serving
in that post until appointed Vice President and Comptroller on June 1, 1996. He
was elected Vice President - Corporate Finance of Registrant on November 5, 1996
and in that capacity served as the principal accounting officer of Registrant
until August 31, 1999. Since September 1, 1999, Mr. Richardson has served as
Vice President, Finance - North American Tire, of Registrant and, in that
capacity, is the executive officer of Registrant responsible for the financial
functions of Goodyear's tire operations in the United States and Canada. Mr.
Richardson has been an employee of Goodyear since 1967.

<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
ERIC A. BERG VICE PRESIDENT 38
</TABLE>

Mr. Berg joined Goodyear on March 6, 2000, when he was elected a Vice
President of Registrant. Mr. Berg is the executive officer responsible for
Goodyear's e-commerce and information technology and systems and is Registrant's
Chief Information Officer. Prior to joining Goodyear, Mr. Berg was a regional
vice president for the Frito-Lay division of Pepsico Inc. from 1999 to 2000,
having joined Pepsico Inc. in 1996. From 1989 to 1996, Mr. Berg was a senior
engagement manager for McKinsey and Company.

<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
RICHARD J. KRAMER VICE PRESIDENT 37
</TABLE>

Mr. Kramer joined Goodyear on March 6, 2000, when he was appointed a Vice
President for corporate finance. On April 10, 2000, Mr. Kramer was elected Vice
President-Corporate Finance of Registrant and in that capacity is the principal
accounting officer of Registrant. Prior to joining Goodyear, Mr. Kramer had been
an associate of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for 13 years, including two years as
a partner.


No family relationship exists between any of the above named executive
officers or between said executive officers and any director or nominee for
director of Registrant.

Each executive officer is elected by the Board of Directors of Registrant
at its annual meeting to a term of one year or until his or her successor is
duly elected, except in those instances where the person is elected at other
than an annual meeting of the Board of Directors in which event such person's
tenure will expire at the next annual meeting of the Board of Directors unless
such person is reelected. The next annual meeting of the Board of Directors is
scheduled to be held on April 2, 2001.


31
34
PART II.

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.


The principal market for Registrant's Common Stock is the New York Stock
Exchange (Stock Exchange Symbol GT). Registrant's Common Stock is also listed on
the Chicago Stock Exchange and The Pacific Exchange. Overseas listings include
the Amsterdam, Paris and the Swiss Stock Exchanges.

Information relating to the high and low sale prices of Registrant's
Common Stock and the dividends paid on such shares during 2000 and 1999 appears
under the caption "Quarterly Data and Market Price Information" in Item 8 of
this Annual Report, at page 81 and is incorporated herein by specific reference.
The first quarter 2001 cash dividend of $.30 per share will be paid on March 15,
2001 to shareholders of record at February 15, 2001.

At February 15, 2001, there were 28,604 record holders of the 158,760,805
shares of the Common Stock of Registrant then outstanding. Approximately
13,774,119 shares of the Common Stock of Registrant were beneficially owned by
32,478 participants in three Employee Savings Plans sponsored by Registrant and
certain of its subsidiaries. The Northern Trust Company is the Trustee for said
Employee Savings Plans.


* * * * * *


On February 25, 1999, Registrant issued its 1.2% Convertible Note Due
August 16, 2000 in the principal amount of Yen13,073,070,934 (the "Note") which
was convertible into 2,281,115 shares of the Common Stock of Registrant at a
conversion price of Yen5,731 per share, subject to certain adjustments. The Note
was purchased by Sumitomo. The Note was sold directly to Sumitomo at par. The
proceeds were used to purchase a similar convertible note from Sumitomo.
Pursuant to the terms of the Note and an agreement between Registrant and
Sumitomo entered into in July of 2000, on August 15, 2000 Sumitomo converted
Yen6,536,535,167 of the principal amount of the Note into 1,138,030 shares of
the Common Stock of Registrant and Registrant issued its 1.2% Convertible Note
due August 16, 2001 in the principal amount of Yen6,536,535,767, which
replacement note was convertible into shares of Common Stock of Registrant at
any time through August 15, 2001 at a conversion price of Yen5,731 per share,
subject to certain adjustments, and, if not theretofore converted, payable at
maturity in cash or shares of the Common Stock at said conversion price. On
February 6, 2001, the entire principal amount of the replacement note was
converted into 1,140,866 shares of the Common Stock of Registrant. A total of
2,278,896 shares of Registrant's Common Stock were issued to Sumitomo, which
shares are subject to certain restrictions on the transfer thereof. No
commission or fee was paid in connection with the issuance and sale of the Note
(or the replacement note) or conversion of the Note into shares of Registrant's
Common Stock. The Registrant determined that the sale of the Note and the
issuance of Registrant's Common Stock to Sumitomo upon conversion of the Note
(and the replacement note) were exempt from registration under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act"), pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Act, as
transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering.


32
35
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(In Millions, Except Per Share) 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net Sales ........................ $ 14,417.1 $ 13,355.4 $ 13,081.6 $ 13,502.0 $ 13,400.7
Income from Continuing
Operations - as reported ....... 40.3 241.1 717.0 522.4 558.5
Change in inventory costing method -- 2.1 (44.8) (25.0) (5.3)
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Income from Continuing
Operations - as restated ....... 40.3 243.2 672.2 497.4 553.2
Discontinued Operations .......... -- -- (34.7) 36.3 (456.8)
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net Income - as restated ......... $ 40.3 $ 243.2 $ 637.5 $ 533.7 $ 96.4
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Per Share of Common Stock:
Income (Loss) Per Share - Basic:
Income from Continuing
Operations - as reported ....... $ .26 $ 1.54 $ 4.58 $ 3.34 $ 3.60
Change in inventory costing method -- .01 (.29) (.16) (.04)
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Income from Continuing
Operations - as restated ....... $ .26 $ 1.55 $ 4.29 $ 3.18 $ 3.56
Discontinued Operations .......... -- -- (.22) .24 (2.94)
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net Income - Basic - as restated . $ .26 $ 1.55 $ 4.07 $ 3.42 $ .62
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Income (Loss) Per Share - Diluted:
Income from Continuing
Operations - as reported ....... $ .25 $ 1.52 $ 4.53 $ 3.30 $ 3.56
Change in inventory costing method -- .01 (.28) (.16) (.03)
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Income from Continuing
Operations - as restated ....... $ .25 $ 1.53 $ 4.25 $ 3.14 $ 3.53
Discontinued Operations .......... -- -- (.22) .23 (2.91)
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net Income - Diluted - as restated $ .25 $ 1.53 $ 4.03 $ 3.37 $ .62
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Dividends Per Share .............. $ 1.20 $ 1.20 $ 1.20 $ 1.14 $ 1.03

Total Assets ..................... $ 13,568.0 $ 13,278.1 $ 10,762.7 $ 10,135.6 $ 9,915.0

Long Term Debt ................... $ 2,349.6 $ 2,347.9 $ 1,186.5 $ 844.5 $ 1,132.2

Shareholders' Equity ............. $ 3,503.0 $ 3,792.6 $ 3,919.2 $ 3,613.7 $ 3,522.3
</TABLE>


NOTES: (1) See "Principles of Consolidation" at Note 1 ("Accounting Policies")
to the Financial Statements at page 58.

(2) During 2000, the Company changed its inventory costing method for
certain domestic inventories from LIFO to FIFO. Prior periods have
been restated. Refer to Note 7 ("Inventories") to the Financial
Statements at page 64.


33
36
(3) During 2000, Goodyear began reporting expenses for transportation of
products to customers as Cost of Goods Sold. Prior periods have been
restated. Refer to Note 1 ("Accounting Policies") to the Financial
Statements at page 58.

(3) Net Income in 2000 included a net after-tax charge of $96.9 million,
or $.61 per share-diluted, for rationalizations and asset sales.

(4) Net Income in 1999 included net after-tax benefit of $22.3 million,
or $.13 per share, resulting from the net after tax gains of $154.8
million, or $.97 per share - diluted, from the change in control of
the businesses contributed by the Company to the Goodyear Dunlop
joint venture in Europe and the sale of certain rubber chemical
assets and net rationalization charges of $132.5 million after tax,
or $.84 per share - diluted.

(5) Net Income in 1998 included a net after-tax gain of $61.3 million,
or $.38 per share-diluted, from the sale of the All American
Pipeline System and related assets, rationalizations and the sale of
other assets.

(6) Net Income in 1997 included net after-tax charges of $176.3 million,
or $1.12 per share-diluted, for rationalizations.

(7) Net income in 1996 included a net after-tax charge of $573.0
million, or $3.65 per share - diluted, for the writedown of the All
American Pipeline System and related assets and certain
rationalization actions.


ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(All per share amounts are diluted)

CONSOLIDATED

Net sales in 2000 were $14.42 billion, compared to $13.36 billion in 1999 and
$13.08 billion in 1998.

Net income was $40.3 million or $.25 per share in 2000, compared to $243.2
million or $1.53 per share in 1999 and $637.5 million or $4.03 per share in
1998. Net income in 1998 included a loss of $34.7 million or $.22 per share on
the sale of the Company's oil transportation business.


ACCOUNTING CHANGES

During 2000, the Company made the following accounting and reporting
changes:

The Company changed its inventory costing method from last-in first-out
(LIFO) to first-in first-out (FIFO) for domestic inventories. The change was
made in part to achieve a better matching of revenues and expenses. The change
increased net income by $44.4 million or $.28 per share in 2000 and $2.1 million
or $.01 per share in 1999. Net income in 1998 was reduced by $44.8 million or
$.28 per share. Prior periods have been restated to reflect this change.

The Company began reporting expenses for transportation of products to
customers as a component of Cost of Goods Sold as a result of the adoption of
EITF Issue No. 00-10, "Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs".
These costs had previously been reported as a reduction of Net Sales.
Transportation costs totaled $526.2 million, $474.9 million and $455.3 million
in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The Company also began reporting equity in
earnings of affiliates separately on the Consolidated Statement of Income. Prior
periods have been reclassified to reflect these changes.


34
37
NET SALES

Worldwide tire unit sales in 2000 were 223.3 million units, an increase of
22.8 million units or 11.4% compared to 1999. The Dunlop businesses acquired
from Sumitomo Rubber Industries Ltd. (SRI) on September 1, 1999 contributed 37.3
million units in 2000, compared to 14.4 million units in 1999. North American
(U.S. and Canada) volume increased 6.9 million units or 6.3% in 2000 (including
an increase of 8.2 million units from Dunlop operations), while international
unit sales increased 15.9 million units or 17.5% (including an increase of 14.7
million units contributed by Dunlop operations). Worldwide replacement unit
sales increased 11.7% in 2000, primarily in the European Union and North
America. Original equipment (OE) unit sales were 10.7% higher in 2000,
increasing in all regions outside of North America.

Worldwide tire unit sales in 1999 were 12.9 million units, or 6.9%, higher
than in 1998. The Dunlop businesses contributed 14.4 million units during the
last four months of 1999. North American Tire volume increased more than 4
million units, which included 4.1 million units contributed by the Dunlop
businesses. North American Tire performance was limited by capacity constraints
in certain passenger and truck tire lines resulting from higher than anticipated
demand from the Company's OE customers and national chain merchandisers in the
North American replacement market, coupled with closing the Gadsden, Alabama
manufacturing facility and the inability to replace lost capacity to meet
increased demand. Total North American volume increased 3.8% from 1998 while
international unit sales increased 10.7%. Worldwide OE unit sales rose 8.2% from
1998, while replacement unit sales increased 6.3%. Both the OE and replacement
markets benefited in 1999 from increased volume in North America, Europe and
Asia. Significant decreases in OE and replacement unit sales were experienced in
Latin American markets in 1999.

Sales increased in 2000 due primarily to higher tire unit sales resulting
from the acquisition of the Dunlop businesses. The Dunlop businesses contributed
$2.26 billion to 2000 sales, compared to $873.4 million in 1999. North American
Tire shipments in 2000 were adversely impacted by production cutbacks by
original equipment customers in the auto and commercial truck industries.
Revenues in 2000 were adversely affected by continuing worldwide competitive
pricing pressures and a shift in mix to lower priced tires. In addition, price
increases implemented in early 2000 were met with resistance in the marketplace
and as a result negatively impacted sales of commercial tires in Europe and
North America. Price increases were implemented in early 2001 in the North
American and European replacement markets.

Revenues in 2000 also were adversely impacted by the effect of currency
translations on international results, primarily in Europe, where the average
value of the Euro versus the U.S. dollar dropped 13.0% from the 1999 average
rate. The Company estimates that versus 1999, currency movements adversely
affected revenues in 2000 by approximately $450 million. Revenues increased in
1999 due primarily to higher tire unit sales. The Dunlop businesses contributed
$873.4 million to 1999 sales. Revenues in 1999 were adversely affected by
continued worldwide competitive pricing pressures, weak economic conditions in
emerging markets and lower unit sales of engineered products. Revenues in 1999
also were adversely impacted by the effect of currency translations on
international results. The Company estimates that versus 1998, currency
movements adversely affected revenues in 1999 by approximately $390 million.


COST OF GOODS SOLD

Cost of goods sold (CGS) was 80.7% of sales in 2000, compared to 81.1% in
1999 and 78.1% in 1998. Costs in 2000 were favorably impacted by the effects of
rationalization actions, ongoing cost containment measures and synergies
realized in part from the strategic alliance with Sumitomo. Margins were
adversely affected by the worldwide competitive pricing environment and a change
in product and market mix to lower margin tires. In addition, costs in 2000
reflected significantly higher energy prices, higher raw material and labor
costs and production cutbacks to align inventory with demand.


35
38
The previously mentioned change in inventory costing methods from LIFO to
FIFO for domestic inventories reduced CGS by $58.4 million in 2000 and $3.4
million in 1999. CGS in 1998 was increased by $72.3 million.

Cost of goods sold in future periods is likely to be unfavorably impacted
by anticipated increases in energy and raw material prices. In addition, the
Company negotiated a new labor agreement in the United States that is
anticipated to result in higher costs in future periods. These costs may not be
recoverable in the market due to pricing pressures present in today's highly
competitive market.

Cost of goods sold increased in dollars and as a percent to sales in 1999
due primarily to higher unit costs associated with lower production levels
resulting from the Company's program to realign capacity and reduce inventories.
Also reflected are higher research and development costs. In addition, the
Company incurred operating charges for inventory writeoffs and adjustments.
These charges relate primarily to inventory writeoffs resulting from the
realignment of North American tire brand positioning and replacement market
distribution strategies and the exit from the Championship Auto Racing Teams and
Indy Racing League (CART/IRL) racing series. Cost of goods sold in 1999 also
reflected a change in product and market mix to lower priced and lower margin
tires and lower margin channels of distribution.

Research and development expenditures in 2000 were $423.1 million,
compared to $438.0 million in 1999 and $420.7 million in 1998. Research and
development expenditures in 2001 are expected to be approximately $400 million.


SAG

Selling, administrative and general expense (SAG) in 2000 was 15.5% of sales,
compared to 15.1% in 1999 and 14.4% in 1998. SAG increased in dollars and as a
percent to sales in both 2000 and 1999 due to the acquisition of, and higher SAG
levels at, the Dunlop businesses acquired on September 1, 1999. SAG benefited in
2000 and 1999 from the favorable impact of ongoing worldwide cost containment
measures.


INTEREST EXPENSE

Interest expense in 2000 was $282.6 million, compared to $179.4 million in 1999
and $147.8 million in 1998. Interest expense increased due to higher debt levels
incurred primarily to fund the acquisition of the Dunlop businesses, increased
market interest rates and an increase in the Company's cost of borrowing.


OTHER (INCOME) AND EXPENSE

Other (income) and expense was $27.8 million in 2000, compared to $(147.1)
million in 1999 and $(76.5) million in 1998. A gain of $5.0 million ($3.2
million after tax or $.02 per share) was recorded in 2000 on the sale of land at
a manufacturing facility in Mexico.

During 1999, other (income) and expense included a gain totaling $149.7
million ($143.7 million after tax or $.90 per share) on the change in control of
25% of the European businesses contributed to Goodyear Dunlop Tires Europe B.V.
by the Company. In addition, proceeds of $17.0 million ($11.1 million after tax
or $.07 per share) were realized in 1999 from the Company's sale of customer
lists and formulations in connection with its exit from the production of
certain rubber chemicals. Interest income increased in 1999 due primarily to
higher interest rates received on time deposits.

The Company recorded gains in 1998 totaling $123.8 million ($76.4 million
after tax or $.48 per share) on the disposition of a latex processing facility
in Georgia and the sale of six distribution facilities in North America and
certain other real estate. A charge of $15.9 million ($10.4 million after tax or
$.07 per share) was recorded in 1998 for the settlement of several related


36
39
lawsuits involving employment matters in Latin America. Interest income
decreased in 1998 due primarily to lower levels of time deposits worldwide.

For further information, refer to the note to the financial statements No.
4, Other (Income) and Expense.


FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE

Foreign currency exchange gains were $6.7 million in 2000, $27.6 million
in 1999 and $2.6 million in 1998. Foreign currency exchange in 1999 benefited
from the impact of currency movements on U.S. dollar denominated monetary items,
primarily in Brazil.


EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF AFFILIATES

Equity in earnings of affiliates was a loss of $22.4 million in 2000,
compared to income of $10.3 million in 1999 and $10.6 million in 1998. The loss
in 2000 was due primarily to operating losses and rationalization charges
incurred by South Pacific Tyres, Ltd. (SPT), an Australian tire manufacturer in
which the Company owns a 50% equity interest. The Company's share of
rationalization charges recorded by SPT in 2000 totaled $16.1 million ($10.5
million after tax or $.07 per share).


INCOME TAXES

The Company's effective tax rate was 20.0%, 16.7% and 26.8% in 2000, 1999
and 1998, respectively. The effective rate in 2000 increased from 1999 due to
the nontaxable character of the $149.7 million gain in 1999 resulting from the
change in control of 25% of the Company's businesses contributed to the European
joint venture with Sumitomo.

For further information, refer to the note to the financial statements No.
16, Income Taxes.


OUTLOOK

Sales and earnings in future periods are likely to be unfavorably impacted
if the dollar strengthens versus various foreign currencies. In addition,
anticipated continued lower OE demand, along with increases in energy and raw
material prices and labor costs, which may not be recoverable in the market due
to pricing pressures present in today's highly competitive market, are also
expected to adversely affect earnings. The Company is unable to predict the
impact of currency fluctuations and economic conditions on its sales and
earnings in future periods. Similarly, continued volatile economic conditions in
emerging markets could adversely affect sales and earnings in future periods.


DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

On July 30, 1998 the Company completed the sale of substantially all of
the assets and liabilities of its oil transportation business. The loss on the
sale, net of income from operations during 1998, totaled $34.7 million after tax
or $.22 per share.

The transaction was accounted for as a sale of discontinued operations and
prior period financial information has been restated as required. For further
information, refer to the note to the financial statements No. 22, Discontinued
Operations.


RATIONALIZATION ACTIVITY

2000 Rationalization Actions - The Company recorded rationalization
charges totaling $118.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2000 ($93.7 million
after tax or $.59 per share) related to global workforce reductions and
manufacturing facility consolidations in Europe, Latin America and Asia. The
Company also recorded rationalization charges totaling $1.2 million in the third
quarter of 2000 ($1.2 million after tax or $.01 per share) related to the
closing of its


37
40
tire manufacturing facility in Italy initiated in 1999 (which is for negotiated
benefits accepted in the third quarter of 2000). The Company also recorded net
rationalization charges totaling $4.7 million ($5.2 million after tax or $.03
per share) in the second quarter of 2000 related to the closure of the Italian
manufacturing facility (which is for negotiated benefits accepted in the second
quarter of 2000) and associate reductions due to sales office consolidation in
Europe following the Company's Dunlop acquisition. In the fourth quarter of
1999, the Company took a charge for the closure of the Italian facility, however
that charge did not include certain associate benefit amounts that had not been
negotiated at that time.

The Company anticipates recording additional rationalization charges in
income in the first quarter of 2001 of approximately $60 million to $65 million.
These charges will be for consolidations at manufacturing facilities and
additional global workforce reductions of approximately 1,300 associates. The
Company anticipates that, through these actions, it will reduce costs by
approximately $150 million in 2001 and approximately $250 million annually
thereafter.

1999 Rationalization Actions - Rationalization actions approved in the
first quarter of 1999 to reduce costs and increase productivity and efficiency
consisted of the termination of tire production at the Gadsden, Alabama
manufacturing facility and the downsizing and consolidation of tire
manufacturing facilities at Freeport, Illinois and 12 other locations in Europe
and Latin America, as well as certain asset sales and other exit costs. The plan
provided for the release of approximately 4,000 associates worldwide, other exit
costs related to the plant downsizing and consolidation actions, additional
costs related to the exit from Formula 1 racing and the anticipated loss on the
sale of a rubber plantation in Asia. The Company decided to resume tire
production in a portion of the Gadsden plant, resulting in a reduction of the
number of associates to be released by approximately 500 and the reversal of
$44.7 million. The balance of the $167.4 million charge was $6.4 million at
December 31, 1999, and these actions were completed during 2000.

During the third quarter of 1999, continued competitive conditions in the
markets served by the Company resulted in the approval of a number of
rationalization actions. The plans consisted of the decision to terminate tire
production at the Argentina manufacturing facility, the reduction of staffing
levels in North American Tire operations and the exit from the CART/IRL racing
series. The planned actions relate to the reduction of approximately 340
associates, early termination of contracts with various racing teams and the
writeoff of equipment taken out of service. Of the $46.5 million of charges
recorded, $19.2 million related to non-cash writeoffs and $27.3 million related
to future cash outflows. The remaining balance was $13.0 million at December 31,
1999, and these actions were completed during 2000.

The Company committed to rationalization actions in the fourth quarter of
1999 to reduce costs and increase productivity. The plans related to the
reduction of approximately 800 associates in North America and a facility in
Europe, as well as the Company's exit from the CART/IRL racing series. The
Company expects these actions to be completed during 2001. The Company recorded
charges of $26.2 million, all of which related to future cash outflows. The
balance remaining was $4.3 million and $21.8 million at December 31, 2000 and
1999, respectively.

During 1999, the Company recorded net rationalization charges of $171.6
million ($132.5 million after tax or $.84 per share). The charges for
rationalization plans adopted in 1999 were as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) Pretax After Tax Per Share
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
First quarter 1999 program $ 167.4 $ 116.0 $ .74
Third quarter 1999 program 46.5 42.4 .27
Fourth quarter 1999 program 26.2 19.3 .12
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 1999 rationalization charges $ 240.1 $ 177.7 $ 1.13
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>


38
41
The rationalization charges reversed and credited to Rationalizations on
the Consolidated Statement of Income during 1999 were as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) Pretax After Tax Per Share
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Second quarter 1999 $ (9.6) $ (6.0) $ (.04)
Third quarter 1999 (40.4) (26.7) (.17)
Fourth quarter 1999 (18.5) (12.5) (.08)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 1999 rationalization credits $ (68.5) $ (45.2) $ (.29)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>


The $68.5 million of reversals consisted of $44.7 million related to the
decision to resume production of certain passenger tire lines in a portion of
the Gadsden, Alabama facility due to higher-than-expected demand in North
America and the high cost of time delays associated with installing additional
capacity at other plants. Of the $44.7 million reversed, $38.9 million related
to pension curtailment costs and associate severance costs not required and $5.8
million related primarily to noncancellable contracts again utilized.
Additionally, the reversals consisted of $6.8 million related to the abandonment
of the plan to relocate certain agricultural tire production to Turkey due to
rationalization opportunities presented by the Dunlop joint venture in Europe
and production difficulties following a major earthquake in Turkey. The
remaining $17.0 million of the reversals resulted from the evaluation of the
reserves at each balance sheet date and the identification of amounts no longer
needed for their intended purposes, primarily related to the 1997 and the 1996
rationalization programs.

1998 Rationalization Actions - During 1998, the Company did not adopt any
rationalization plans. The Company continued to implement previously adopted
rationalization programs and also reversed and credited to Rationalizations
$29.7 million ($19.6 million after tax or $.12 per share) of charges originally
made in respect of the 1997 rationalization program, which consisted of $22.0
million resulting from favorable settlement of obligations related to the
Company's exit from the Formula 1 racing series and $7.7 million related to
plant downsizing and closure activities.


2000 PROGRAM

The Company committed to rationalization actions in the second and fourth
quarters to reduce costs and increase productivity and efficiency. These actions
consisted of global workforce reductions and manufacturing facility
consolidations in Europe, Latin America and Asia. The Company recorded charges
totaling $119.4 million ($95.0 million after tax or $.59 per share), of which
$86.4 million related to future cash outflows, primarily for associate severance
costs and $33.0 million related to non-cash writeoffs.

Under the 2000 program, 500 associates were released in 2000 at a cost of
$19.4 million. The Company plans to release approximately 5,100 more associates
under the above programs during 2001. The remaining reserve for costs related to
the completion of the 2000 program was $82.0 million at December 31, 2000.


1999 PROGRAM

The Company committed to a number of rationalization actions in the first,
third and fourth quarters of 1999 totaling $240.1 million. An additional charge
totaling $6.0 million ($6.0 million after tax or $.04 per share) related to the
1999 program was recorded in 2000, resulting from contract settlements
negotiated in the second, third and fourth quarters as part of the closure of
the Company's tire manufacturing facility in Italy. These charges are for
associates who accepted negotiated benefits in those respective periods. The
balance of the provisions recorded under the 1999 program totaled $4.3 million
and $41.2 million at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. The Company
reversed $1.3 million of rationalization reserves during the second quarter of
2000 identified as no longer needed for their originally intended purposes.


39
42
Under the 1999 program, approximately 450 associates were released in 2000
at a cost of $30.6 million. These associates were primarily hourly and staff
associates in Italy and production and support associates at a Latin American
facility. The Company plans to release approximately 350 more associates under
the 1999 program during 2001. The remaining reserve for associate-related costs
related to the completion of the 1999 program was $4.3 million and $29.4 million
at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

Rationalization costs, other than for associate-related costs, totaling
$11.0 million were incurred during 2000. These costs were primarily for contract
settlement costs as a result of the Company's exit from the Championship Auto
Racing Teams and Indy Racing League (CART/IRL) racing series. These actions were
completed during 1999. The remaining reserve for other than associate-related
costs related to the completion of the 1999 program was $11.8 million at
December 31, 1999.


PREVIOUS PROGRAMS

The Company has completed the actions under its rationalization programs
from previous periods, with the exception of deferred benefit payments to
associates who have been released and payments under noncancellable leases.


DUNLOP PROGRAM

The following rationalization actions have been recorded as adjustments to
the purchase price allocation in respect of the acquired Dunlop businesses, and
did not affect the Consolidated Statement of Income.

The Company committed to certain rationalization actions related to the
Dunlop businesses acquired from Sumitomo on September 1, 1999, for the purpose
of optimizing market growth opportunities and maximizing cost efficiencies. The
Company recorded costs in 1999 and 2000 totaling $67.1 million, substantially
all of which were for future cash outflows. Under these rationalization
programs, associate-related costs for the release or relocation of approximately
2,000 production, support, technical, retail and administrative associates
totaling $52.8 million were recorded, and rationalization costs, other than
associate-related costs, totaling $14.3 million were recorded primarily for
lease cancellations and future rental payments under noncancellable leases.
Through December 31, 2000, costs totaling $38.9 million had been incurred. The
remaining balance of these provisions at December 31, 2000 totaled $28.2
million.

The Company expects that these actions will be completed during 2001,
except for future rental payments under noncancellable leases. Annual pretax
savings of approximately $300 million are expected when the planned actions have
been fully implemented.

For further information, refer to the note to the financial statements No.
3, Rationalizations.


STRATEGIC ALLIANCE

On September 1, 1999, the Company commenced operations under a global
alliance with Sumitomo Rubber Industries Ltd. ("Sumitomo") which included, among
other things, the formation of tire manufacturing and sales joint ventures. In
addition to its businesses contributed to the joint ventures, the Company paid
$931.6 million to Sumitomo and its affiliates, which was financed by the
issuance of additional debt.

Under the global alliance agreements, the Company acquired 75%, and
Sumitomo owned 25%, of Goodyear Dunlop Tires Europe B.V., a Netherlands holding
company. Concurrently, the holding company acquired substantially all of
Sumitomo's tire businesses in Europe, including eight tire manufacturing plants
located in England, France and Germany and sales and distribution operations in
18 European countries, and most of the Company's tire businesses in Europe.
Excluded from the European joint venture are the Company's tire businesses in
Poland


40
43
(other than a sales company), Slovenia and Turkey (as well as Morocco and South
Africa), the Company's aircraft tire businesses, and the Company's textile,
steel tire cord and tire mold manufacturing plants, a technical center and
related facilities located in Luxembourg.

The Company also acquired 75%, and Sumitomo acquired 25%, of Goodyear
Dunlop Tires North America Ltd., a holding company that purchased Sumitomo's
tire manufacturing operations in North America and certain of its related tire
sales and distribution operations. In addition, the Company acquired 100% of the
balance of Sumitomo's Dunlop Tire distribution and sales operations in the
United States and Canada. The Company also acquired a 25% (and Sumitomo acquired
a 75%) equity interest in each of two tire companies in Japan, one for the
distribution and sale of Goodyear-brand passenger and truck tires in the
replacement market in Japan and the other for the distribution and sale of
Goodyear-brand and Dunlop-brand tires to original equipment manufacturers in
Japan. The Company transferred certain assets of its subsidiary located in Japan
in exchange for such equity interests and approximately $27 million in cash.

The Company also acquired a 51% (and Sumitomo acquired a 49%) equity
interest in a company that will coordinate and disseminate commercialized tire
technology among the Company, Sumitomo, the joint ventures and their respective
affiliates, and an 80% (and Sumitomo acquired a 20%) equity interest in a global
purchasing company. The global alliance Agreements also provided for the
investment by the Company and Sumitomo in the common stock of the other.

The Company accounted for the strategic alliance using the purchase
method. The cost of the acquired businesses totaled approximately $1.24 billion,
including the cash payment of $931.6 million and the fair value of 25% of the
Goodyear businesses contributed to the European joint venture, or $307 million.
In addition, the Dunlop businesses contributed to the joint venture companies by
Sumitomo included $130 million of debt. The Company will amortize substantially
all of the approximately $367 million of goodwill recorded on the transaction on
a straight-line basis over 40 years. The Company recognized a gain of $149.7
million ($143.7 million after tax or $.90 per share) on the change of control of
25% of the businesses it contributed to the European joint venture.

In connection with the acquisition of the Dunlop businesses, the
Company undertook an extensive analysis and assessment of the various activities
of the combined businesses in order to optimize market growth opportunities as
well as maximize cost efficiencies. The actions under the plan included the
downsizing or consolidation of various manufacturing, sales, support and
distribution operations. The Company has finalized and implemented the
integration plan and recorded $67.1 million as adjustments to the acquisition
cost since September 1, 1999. Although the integration plan has been
implemented, certain actions have not yet been fully executed and will be
completed in 2001.

For further information, refer to the notes to the financial statements
No. 2, Strategic Alliance, No. 3, Rationalizations and No. 8, Investments.

YEAR 2000

In preparation for the rollover to the year 2000, during 1997, 1998 and
1999 the Company inventoried and assessed all date sensitive technical
infrastructure and information and transaction processing computer systems ("I/T
Systems") and its potentially date sensitive manufacturing and other operating
systems ("Process Systems"), including those that use embedded technology such
as micro-controllers and micro-processors, to determine the actions required to
render the I/T Systems and Process Systems year 2000 compliant. The Company
tested and, when necessary, remediated or replaced non-compliant I/T Systems
prior to December 31, 1999.

The Company's year 2000 compliance efforts were successful. Its ability
to manufacture and distribute its products was not impaired by year 2000 issues
and it did not incur liability for


41
44
breach of contract or other harm arising out of any failure of its I/T Systems
and Process Systems to be year 2000 compliant.

THE EURO

On January 1, 2002, the Euro will become the sole lawful currency of
each member state of the European Monetary Union. The Company is actively
preparing for the conversion of all information systems software to the Euro,
which will become the functional currency of most of its European businesses.
This conversion will not have a material impact on results of operations,
financial position or liquidity of its European operations.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

On January 1, 2001, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities", as amended and interpreted (SFAS 133). SFAS 133 requires all
derivatives to be recognized as assets or liabilities and measured at fair
value. Changes in such fair value will impact earnings to the extent of any
ineffectiveness in hedging relationships. The adoption of SFAS 133 did not
result in any significant adverse impact on the Company's interest rate or
foreign exchange risk management activities, and did not have a material impact
on the Company's results of operations, financial position or liquidity. Results
of operations and financial position in this Annual Report do not reflect the
adoption of SFAS 133.

SEGMENT INFORMATION

Segment information reflects the strategic business units of the
Company, which are organized to meet customer requirements and global
competition. The tire business is managed on a regional basis. Engineered
Products and Chemical Products are managed on a global basis.

Results of operations in the tire and engineered products business
segments were measured based on net sales to unaffiliated customers and EBIT.
Results of operations of the chemical business included transfers to other
segments. EBIT is computed as follows: net sales less cost of goods sold,
selling, administrative and general expense (including allocated central
administrative expenses) and equity in earnings of affiliated companies.

Segment EBIT was $599.0 million in 2000, $544.6 million in 1999 and
$1.05 billion in 1998. Segment operating margin in 2000 was 4.0%, compared to
3.9% in 1999 and 7.8% in 1998.

During 2000, the Company made the previously mentioned change in its
inventory costing method for domestic inventories. Prior periods have been
restated. The change increased segment operating income by $58.4 million in 2000
and $3.4 million in 1999, but decreased segment operating income by $72.3
million in 1998.

Segment EBIT does not include the previously discussed rationalizations
and certain items reported in Other (Income) and Expense. For further
information, refer to the note to the financial statements No. 20, Business
Segments.

NORTH AMERICAN TIRE

North American Tire segment sales in 2000 were $7.11 billion,
increasing 7.0% from $6.65 billion in 1999 and 9.3% from $6.51 billion in 1998.

Unit sales in 2000 were 115.9 million, increasing 6.3% from 1999 and
10.4% from 1998. Dunlop operations contributed 12.3 million units in 2000,
compared to 4.1 million in 1999. Replacement unit sales in 2000 increased 10.7%
from 1999 and 13.3% from 1998. Original equipment volume in 2000 decreased 2.1%
from 1999 but increased 4.5% from 1998.


42
45
Sales in 2000 increased from 1999 due to the acquisition of the Dunlop
businesses in the United States and Canada. The Dunlop businesses contributed
$755.0 million to sales in 2000, compared to $252.3 million in 1999. Sales in
the last four months of 2000 benefited from increased volume resulting from the
recall of 6.5 million Firestone tires. Sales reflected improved customer fill
rates from 1999, but revenues were adversely impacted by reduced tire shipments
resulting from production cutbacks by original equipment customers in the auto
and commercial truck industries. In addition, price increases implemented
earlier in 2000 met with resistance in the marketplace and as a result
negatively impacted sales of commercial tires in North America. Price increases
were implemented in early 2001 in the replacement market.

Sales in 1999 increased from 1998 due to higher tire unit sales
resulting from the acquisition of the Dunlop businesses. Revenues in 1999 were
adversely impacted by competitive pricing pressures and a shift in mix to lower
margin tires. The Company also experienced unanticipated product shortages of
certain passenger and truck tire lines and sizes.

North American Tire segment EBIT was $260.7 million in 2000, compared
to $26.3 million in 1999 and $314.2 million in 1998. Operating margin in 2000
was 3.7%, compared to .4% in 1999 and 4.8% in 1998. The change in inventory
costing methods increased operating income by $46.5 million in 2000 and $6.5
million in 1999, but decreased operating income by $65.3 million in 1998.

EBIT in 2000 increased from 1999 due to the acquisition of the Dunlop
businesses, lower SAG resulting from cost reduction programs and the inclusion
of nonrecurring costs in EBIT in 1999. EBIT in 2000 also benefited from
increased consumer replacement shipments due to the Firestone recall. EBIT was
adversely affected by significantly higher energy costs, increased raw material
and labor costs and production cutbacks to better align inventory with OE
demand.

EBIT in 1999 decreased from 1998 due primarily to increased production
costs associated with higher unit volumes, shifts in mix to lower margin tires,
competitive pricing conditions, reduced capacity utilization rates during the
first half of 1999 due to realignment of capacity and inventory reduction
measures, increased distribution costs, higher labor costs and higher research
and development costs. EBIT in 1999 also included charges for inventory
writeoffs and adjustments resulting primarily from the realignment of brand
positioning and replacement market distribution strategies occasioned by the
addition of the Dunlop brand on September 1, 1999 and from the Company's exit
from CART/IRL racing. EBIT was favorably affected in 1999 by the acquisition of
the Dunlop Tire businesses in the United States and Canada.

EBIT in 2000 did not include net rationalization credits totaling $.7
million. EBIT in 1999 did not include net rationalization charges totaling $71.5
million. EBIT in 1998 did not include $7.7 million of credits resulting from
rationalization reversals and gains on asset sales totaling $44.1 million.

Revenues and EBIT in the North American Tire segment may be adversely
affected in future periods by the effects of continued competitive pricing
conditions, lower demand by OE customers, changes in mix, rising raw material
and energy prices and currency translations. General economic conditions may
affect demand from OE customers.

EUROPEAN UNION TIRE

European Union Tire segment sales in 2000 were $3.20 billion,
increasing 21.0% from $2.64 billion in 1999 and 49.5% from $2.14 billion in
1998.

Unit sales in 2000 were 60.3 million, increasing 31.8% from 1999 and
70.1% from 1998. Dunlop operations contributed 25.0 million units in 2000,
compared to 10.3 million in 1999. Replacement unit sales in 2000 increased 28.6%
from 1999 and 67.7% from 1998. Original equipment volume in 2000 increased 39.8%
from 1999 and 76.0% from 1998.


43
46
Sales in 2000 increased from 1999 due to the acquisition of the Dunlop
businesses. The Dunlop businesses contributed $1.50 billion to sales in 2000,
compared to $621.1 million in 1999. Revenues were adversely impacted by the
decrease in the value of the Euro versus the U.S. dollar, competitive pricing,
especially in England and Germany, lower volume in some market segments and a
change in mix to lower priced tires. The Company estimates that the effects of
currency translation adversely affected European Union Tire segment sales by
approximately $300 million in 2000.

Revenues in 1999 increased from 1998 due to higher tire unit sales
resulting from the acquisition of the Dunlop businesses, which contributed
$621.1 million to 1999 sales. Revenues in 1999 were adversely impacted by the
effects of currency translation and competitive pricing pressures.

European Union Tire segment EBIT was $88.7 million in 2000, decreasing
52.8% from $188.0 million in 1999 and 55.6% from $199.7 million in 1998.
Operating margin in 2000 was 2.8%, compared to 7.1% in 1999 and 9.3% in 1998.

EBIT in 2000 decreased from 1999 due to competitive market conditions,
manufacturing inefficiencies resulting from the relocation of tire production
from England to the European continent and the closure of a tire plant in Italy,
and higher raw material and energy prices. In addition, the Company estimates
that the effects of currency translations reduced operating income by
approximately $20 million in 2000. EBIT was favorably affected in 2000 by higher
tire unit sales resulting from the acquisition of the Dunlop businesses.

EBIT in 1999 decreased from 1998 due primarily to lower margins as a
result of pricing pressures. EBIT in 1999 was also adversely impacted by
increased costs resulting from ongoing programs to align production with
inventory, the effects of currency translations and higher SAG.

EBIT in 2000 did not include net rationalization charges totaling $23.3
million. EBIT in 1999 did not include net rationalization charges totaling $2.8
million. A gain totaling $149.7 million resulting from the change in control of
25% of the Company's businesses contributed to the European joint venture was
also not included in 1999 EBIT. EBIT in 1998 did not include gains totaling $3.2
million from asset sales.

The Company anticipates that it may incur additional rationalization
charges totaling approximately $10 million to $12 million in 2001, related to
the closure of its tire manufacturing facility in Italy. These charges will be
recorded as associates accept negotiated benefits.

The Company anticipates continued fluctuations in the value of the U.S.
dollar relative to the Euro and other Western European currencies. Revenues and
EBIT in the European Union Tire segment may be adversely affected in future
periods by the effects of currency translations, continued competitive pricing
conditions, changes in mix and rising raw material and energy prices.

EASTERN EUROPE, AFRICA AND MIDDLE EAST TIRE

Eastern Europe, Africa and Middle East Tire ("Eastern Europe Tire")
segment sales in 2000 were $793.0 million, decreasing 2.4% from $812.9 million
in 1999 and 8.6% from $867.4 million in 1998.

Unit sales in 2000 were 15.6 million, decreasing 1.5% from 1999 but
increasing .7% from 1998. Replacement unit sales in 2000 decreased 3.7% from
1999 and 1.3% from 1998. Original equipment volume in 2000 increased 7.4% from
1999 and 8.3% from 1998.

Revenues in 2000 decreased from 1999 due to a downturn in the
replacement market and the effects of currency translation, but benefited from
generally improved pricing in the region and a general improvement in the
economic conditions in Eastern Europe and South Africa. The


44
47
Company estimates that the effects of currency translation adversely affected
Eastern Europe Tire segment sales by approximately $75 million in 2000.

Revenues in 1999 decreased from 1998 despite higher tire unit sales,
due primarily to the effects of currency translation, competitive pricing
conditions and adverse economic conditions in Eastern Europe, South Africa and
Turkey. Revenues were favorably impacted in 1999 by the acquisition of a
majority interest in tire manufacturing operations in Slovenia in the third
quarter of 1998.

Eastern Europe Tire EBIT was $54.6 million in 2000, increasing 9.6%
from $49.8 million in 1999 but decreasing 46.7% from $102.4 million in 1998.
Operating margin in 2000 was 6.9%, compared to 6.1% in 1999 and 11.8% in 1998.

EBIT in 2000 increased from 1999 due primarily to increased factory
utilization levels and improved market conditions. EBIT in 2000 was adversely
impacted by an industry-wide strike in Turkey.

EBIT in 1999 decreased from 1998 due primarily to lower revenues,
increased production unit costs associated with programs to realign capacity and
reduce inventories, the impact of a major earthquake on the Turkish economy and
adverse economic conditions in Eastern Europe and South Africa.

EBIT in 2000 did not include net rationalization charges totaling $9.6
million. EBIT in 1999 did not include net rationalization charges totaling $.3
million. EBIT in 1998 did not include gains on asset sales totaling $.9 million.

The Company anticipates continued fluctuations in the value of the U.S.
dollar relative to the various currencies in the markets served by Eastern
Europe Tire. Revenues and EBIT in the Eastern Europe Tire segment may be
adversely affected in future periods by the effects of continued competitive
pricing conditions, changes in mix, rising raw material and energy prices and
currency translations.

LATIN AMERICAN TIRE

Latin American Tire segment sales in 2000 were $1.05 billion,
increasing 10.5% from $948.1 million in 1999 but decreasing 17.5% from $1.27
billion in 1998.

Unit sales in 2000 were 19.7 million, increasing 11.0% from 1999 but
decreasing 5.3% from 1998. Replacement unit sales in 2000 increased 5.2% from
1999 but decreased 4.7% from 1998. Original equipment volume in 2000 increased
34.2% from 1999 but decreased 7.2% from 1998.

Revenues in 2000 increased from 1999 due primarily to higher tire unit
sales, but were adversely affected by competitive pricing pressures.

Revenues in 1999 decreased from 1998 due primarily to significantly
lower tire unit sales due primarily to the continuing economic downturn in the
region, competitive pricing pressures and the effects of currency translations.

Latin American Tire segment EBIT was $69.8 million in 2000, increasing
3.1% from $67.7 million in 1999 but decreasing 62.5% from $186.1 million in
1998. Operating margin in 2000 was 6.7%, compared to 7.1% in 1999 and 14.7% in
1998.

EBIT in 2000 increased from 1999 due to higher tire unit sales, but was
adversely affected by continued pricing pressures and higher raw material and
labor costs.

EBIT in 1999 decreased from 1998 due to lower revenues, competitive
pricing and increased unit costs resulting from lower levels of capacity
utilization necessary to align production with demand and reduce inventory.


45
48
EBIT in 2000 did not include rationalization charges totaling $65.7
million and a $5.0 million gain on the sale of land at a manufacturing facility
in Mexico. EBIT in 1999 did not include rationalization charges totaling $77.3
million. EBIT in 1998 did not include a charge for a lawsuit settlement totaling
$14.1 million and gains on asset sales totaling $3.4 million.

The Company anticipates continued fluctuations in the value of the U.S.
dollar relative to Latin American currencies. Revenues and EBIT in future
periods may be adversely affected by the effects of continued competitive
pricing conditions, changes in mix, rising raw material and energy prices,
continued volatile economic conditions and currency translations.

ASIA TIRE

Asia Tire segment sales in 2000 were $524.6 million, decreasing 11.6%
from $593.2 million in 1999 but increasing 1.0% from $519.3 million in 1998.

Unit sales in 2000 were 11.8 million, decreasing 2.1% from 1999 but
increasing 8.9% from 1998. Replacement unit sales in 2000 decreased 8.7% from
1999 and 6.8% from 1998. Original equipment volume in 2000 increased 24.5% from
1999 and 117.8% from 1998.

Revenues in 2000 decreased from 1999 due primarily to the absence of
the replacement tire business transferred to the Company's non-consolidated
joint venture with Sumitomo in Japan, which contributed revenues of
approximately $49.7 million in 1999. In addition, revenues were adversely
affected by competitive pricing, a less favorable product mix and currency
translations.

Revenues in 1999 increased from 1998 due primarily to higher tire unit
sales, the favorable impact of currency translations and improving economic
conditions in the region. Revenues in 1999 were adversely affected by
competitive pricing pressures and the transfer of businesses to the
non-consolidated Asia joint venture with Sumitomo.

Asia Tire segment EBIT was $17.9 million in 2000, decreasing 31.2% from
$26.0 million in 1999 but increasing 138.7% from $7.5 million in 1998. Operating
margin in 2000 was 3.4%, compared to 4.4% in 1999 and 1.4% in 1998.

EBIT in 2000 decreased from 1999 due primarily to lower tire unit
sales, competitive pricing conditions driven in part by increased low cost
imports into the region and a shift in mix to lower margin tires, higher raw
material and energy costs and price competition.

EBIT in 1999 increased from 1998 due primarily to higher revenues and
lower raw material costs, but was adversely impacted by a charge of $5.2 million
to write off obsolete equipment in India.

EBIT in 2000 did not include rationalization charges totaling $3.3
million. EBIT in 1999 did not include rationalization charges totaling $1.5
million. EBIT in 1998 did not include gains on asset sales totaling $10.1
million.

The Company anticipates continued fluctuations in the value of the U.S.
dollar relative to Asian currencies. Revenues and EBIT in future periods may be
adversely affected by the effects of currency translations, continued
competitive pricing conditions, changes in mix and rising raw material prices.

Sales and EBIT of the Asia Tire segment do not include South Pacific
Tyres Ltd. (SPT), a tire manufacturer in Australia and New Zealand, which is 50%
owned by the Company. Results of operations of SPT are not reported in segment
results and are reflected in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income
using the equity method.


46
49
The following table presents the sales and operating income of the
Company's Asia Tire segment together with 100% of the sales and EBIT of SPT:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 2000 1999 1998
- ---------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
NET SALES:
Asia Tire Segment $ 524.6 $ 593.2 $ 519.3
SPT 563.6 674.5 654.0
- ---------------------------------------------------------
$1,088.2 $1,267.7 $1,173.3
- ---------------------------------------------------------

EBIT:
Asia Tire Segment $ 17.9 $ 26.0 $ 7.5
SPT (11.1) 31.2 47.2
- ---------------------------------------------------------
$ 6.8 $ 57.2 $ 54.7
- ---------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

SPT sales in 2000 were $563.6 million, decreasing 16.4% from $674.5
million in 1999 and 13.8% from $654.0 million in 1998. Revenues in 2000
decreased from 1999 due to competitive pressures from low cost imported tires
and the effects of currency translation. Revenues in 1999 increased from 1998
due primarily to the effects of currency translations and increased export
sales.

SPT EBIT was a loss of $11.1 million in 2000, compared to income of
$31.2 million in 1999 and $47.2 million in 1998. EBIT in 2000 decreased from
1999 due to production inefficiencies and higher raw material costs. EBIT in
1999 decreased from 1998 due primarily to increased competition in the
Australian replacement market, particularly passenger, and lower OE and export
margins.

SPT EBIT in 2000 did not include rationalization charges totaling $32.2
million.

ENGINEERED PRODUCTS

Engineered Products segment sales in 2000 were $1.17 billion,
decreasing 4.9% from $1.23 billion in 1999 and 9.8% from $1.30 billion in 1998.

Revenues in 2000 decreased from 1999 due primarily to the Company's
exit from the interior trim business in 1999, which contributed revenues of
approximately $71.0 million in that year. In addition, revenues were adversely
affected by reduced demand for conveyor belting for the mining and agriculture
industries and reduced demand for hose and power transmission products in the
North American replacement market.

Revenues in 1999 decreased from 1998 due primarily to lower unit sales
resulting from the exit from the interior trim business and reduced demand for
conveyor belting from the mining and agriculture industries, unfavorable
currency translation and adverse economic conditions in Latin America and South
Africa.

Engineered Products segment EBIT in 2000 was $43.1 million, decreasing
38.8% from $70.4 million in 1999 and 61.4% from $111.7 million in 1998.
Operating margin in 2000 was 3.7%, compared to 5.7% in 1999 and 8.6% in 1998.

EBIT in 2000 decreased from 1999 due primarily to reduced demand,
reduced capacity utilization, higher raw material costs and competitive pricing.
EBIT in 1999 decreased from 1998 due primarily to lower revenues, increased
costs resulting from product adjustments and idle plant costs required to align
production with demand and reduce inventories.

EBIT in 2000 did not include net rationalization charges of $3.8
million. EBIT in 1999 did not include net rationalization charges totaling $8.8
million. EBIT in 1998 did not include a charge for a lawsuit settlement totaling
$1.8 million and a gain on an asset sale totaling $.6 million.



47
50
The Company anticipates continued fluctuations in the value of the U.S.
dollar relative to currencies in the markets served by the Engineered Products
segment. Revenues and EBIT in the Engineered Products segment may be adversely
affected in future periods by competitive pricing pressures, currency
translations, expected continuing unfavorable economic conditions in certain
markets, adverse economic conditions globally in the mining, construction and
agriculture industries and increasing raw material and energy prices.

CHEMICAL PRODUCTS

Chemical Products segment sales in 2000 were $1.13 billion, increasing
18.9% from $949.8 million in 1999 and 13.8% from $993.0 million in 1998.
Approximately 50% of Chemical Products sales are to the Company's other
segments.

Revenues in 2000 increased from 1999 due primarily to price increases
and higher sales volume. Revenues in 1999 decreased from 1998 due primarily to
competitive pricing pressures.

Chemical Products segment EBIT in 2000 was $64.2 million, decreasing
44.8% from $116.4 million in 1999 and 51.6% from $132.7 million in 1998.
Operating margin in 2000 was 5.7%, compared to 12.3% in 1999 and 13.4% in 1998.

EBIT in 2000 decreased from 1999 due primarily to increased raw
material and energy prices and the inability to recover cost increases due to
the competitive pricing environment. EBIT in 1999 decreased from 1998 due
primarily to competitive pricing pressures.

EBIT in 1999 did not include a net rationalization charge of $2.5
million and third quarter proceeds of $17 million from the sale of customer
lists and formulations in connection with the Company's exit from the production
of certain rubber chemicals. EBIT in 1998 did not include gains on asset sales
totaling $61.5 million.

Revenues and EBIT in the Chemical Products segment may be adversely
affected in future periods by competitive pricing pressures and increasing raw
material and energy prices.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

Net cash provided by operating activities was $509.8 million during
2000, as reported on the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. Inventories
increased, although working capital requirements decreased for receivables and
payables.

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

Net cash used in investing activities was $468.4 million during 2000.
Capital expenditures in 2000 were $614.5 million, of which $330.4 million was
used on projects to increase capacity and improve productivity and $284.1
million was used for tire molds and various other projects. Capital expenditures
are expected to approximate $550 million to $600 million in 2001. At December
31, 2000, the Company had binding commitments for land, buildings and equipment
of $177.1 million. Depreciation and amortization are expected to be in the range
of $600 million to $700 million in 2001.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 2000 1999 1998
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Capital expenditures $ 614.5 $ 805.0 $ 838.4
Depreciation 593.6 557.6 487.8
Amortization 36.7 24.1 18.1
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

Investing activities in 2000 included the sale of leasehold interests
in, and the sale and leaseback of, various distribution facilities in the United
States. The Company also acquired a majority ownership interest in a retreading
production and distribution operation in the United States.


48
51
Investing activities in 1999 included a cash payment of $931.6 million
for the acquisition of majority interests in the Dunlop Tire businesses in
Europe and North America. The asset acquisition amount of $892.0 million
reflected on the Company's Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows is net of cash
received. Other investing activities in 1999 included the net proceeds of $27
million from the sale of assets to the Japanese joint ventures formed under the
strategic alliance, which are 25% owned by the Company, and the $17 million of
proceeds from the sale of customer lists and formulations in connection with the
Company's exit from the production of certain rubber chemicals.

Investing activities in 1998 included acquisitions of majority
ownership interests in tire manufacturers in Slovenia, India and Japan. In
addition, the Company raised its ownership to 100% of the Company's tire and
engineered products subsidiary in South Africa and the Brad Ragan subsidiary in
the United States. Investing activities in 1998 also included the divestitures
of the Company's oil transportation business, a latex processing facility in
Georgia, six distribution facilities in North America and other miscellaneous
real estate.

For further information on investing activities, refer to the notes to
the financial statements No. 2, Strategic Alliance and No. 8, Investments.

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Net cash used in financing activities was $3.6 million during 2000.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in millions) 2000 1999 1998
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Consolidated Debt $3,585.8 $3,424.5 $1,975.8
Debt to Debt and Equity 50.6% 47.4% 33.5%
</TABLE>

During 2000, the Company issued $300 million of its 8.125% Notes due
2003 and $300 million of its 8.50% Notes due 2007. The Company also issued
Euro400 million ($384.4 million at June 6, 2000) of its 6.375% Notes due 2005.
The proceeds from the issuance of these Notes were used to repay outstanding
commercial paper and short term bank borrowings.

In connection with the Company's planned strategic alliance with
Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd., on February 25, 1999 the Company issued to
Sumitomo at par a 1.2% Convertible Note Due August 16, 2000 in the principal
amount of Yen13,073,070,934 (equivalent to $108.0 million at February 25, 1999).
The Company's Note was convertible during the period beginning July 16, 2000
through August 15, 2000 into 2,281,115 shares of the Common Stock, without par
value, of the Company at a conversion price of Yen5,731 per share, subject to
certain adjustments. Consolidated Debt and Debt to Debt and Equity as stated
above do not reflect the issuance of the Company's 1.2% Convertible Note.

In addition, on February 25, 1999 the Company purchased at par from
Sumitomo a 1.2% Convertible Note Due August 16, 2000 in the principal amount of
Yen13,073,070,934 (also equivalent to $108.0 million at February 25, 1999). The
Sumitomo Note was convertible during the period beginning July 16, 2000 through
August 15, 2000 into 24,254,306 shares of the Common Stock, Yen50 par value per
share, of Sumitomo at a conversion price of Yen539 per share, subject to certain
adjustments. On July 27, 2000 the Company converted the Sumitomo Note into
24,254,306 shares of Sumitomo Common Stock. As a result, the Company owns 10% of
Sumitomo's outstanding shares. The fair value of the Sumitomo Common Stock at
December 31, 2000 was $100.9 million. For further information, refer to the note
to the financial statements No. 8, Investments.

On June 14, 1999, the Company and Sumitomo agreed that they would not
redeem their respective Notes and would convert the Notes, subject to the
condition that the global alliance between the Company and Sumitomo was
operating at July 1, 2000. On July 7, 2000, the Company and Sumitomo amended the
Purchase Agreement and on August 15, 2000: (1) Sumitomo converted
Yen6,536,535,167 principal amount of the Company's Note into approximate-


49
52
ly 1,138,030 shares of the Common Stock of the Company; (2) the Company paid
Yen223,933,167 of interest on the Note; and (3) Sumitomo surrendered the Note
and the Company issued a replacement note in the principal amount of
Yen6,536,535,767 due on August 16, 2001 and payable at the Company's option in
cash or in shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of Yen5,731, subject to
adjustment. The replacement note bears interest at the rate of 1.2% per annum
from August 15, 2000 until the fifteenth day prior to maturity (or, if earlier,
conversion) and is convertible into Common Stock of the Company at a conversion
price of Yen5,731 per share, subject to adjustment, at any time prior to
maturity. On January 15, 2001, Sumitomo gave notice to the Company that it will
convert the replacement note into approximately 1,140,866 shares of the Common
Stock of the Company on February 6, 2001.

CREDIT SOURCES

Substantial short term and long term credit sources are available to
the Company globally under normal commercial practices. At December 31, 2000,
the Company had an aggregate of $297.7 million of commercial paper outstanding.
In addition, at December 31, 2000, the Company had short term committed and
uncommitted bank credit arrangements totaling $2.2 billion, of which $.93
billion were unused. The Company also had available long term credit
arrangements at December 31, 2000 totaling $3.5 billion, of which $1.5 billion
were unused.

The Company is a party to two revolving credit facility agreements,
consisting of a $750 million five-year revolving credit facility and a $750
million 364-day revolving credit facility.

The $750 million five-year facility agreement is with 27 domestic and
international banks and provides that the Company may borrow at any time until
August 15, 2005, when the commitment terminates and any outstanding loans
mature. The Company pays a commitment fee ranging from 12.5 to 25 basis points
on the entire amount of the commitment (whether or not borrowed) and a usage fee
on amounts borrowed (other than on a competitive bid or prime rate basis)
ranging from 37.5 to 100 basis points. These fees may fluctuate quarterly within
these ranges based upon the Company's leverage. During 2000, commitment fees
ranged from 7.5 to 15 basis points and usage fees ranged from 22.5 to 45 basis
points. Commitment and usage fees paid during 2000 averaged 12.5 basis points.

The $750 million 364-day credit facility agreement is with 27 domestic
and international banks and provides that the Company may borrow until August
15, 2001, on which date the facility commitment terminates, except as it may be
extended on a bank by bank basis. If a bank does not extend its commitment if
requested to do so, the Company may obtain from such bank a two year term loan
up to the amount of such bank's commitment. The Company pays a commitment fee
ranging from 10 to 20 points on the entire amount of the commitment (whether or
not borrowed) and a usage fee on amounts borrowed (other than on a competitive
bid or prime rate basis) ranging from 40 to 105 basis points. These fees may
fluctuate quarterly within these ranges based upon the Company's leverage. Under
both agreements, a utilization fee of 25 basis points per annum is charged each
day on which the sum of the outstanding loans exceeds 50% of the total facility.

Under both the five-year and the 364-day facilities, the Company may
obtain loans bearing interest at reserve adjusted LIBOR or a defined certificate
of deposit rate, plus in each case the applicable usage fee. In addition, the
Company may obtain loans based on the prime rate or at a rate determined on a
competitive bid basis. The facility agreements each contain certain covenants
which, among other things, require the Company to maintain at the end of each
fiscal quarter a minimum consolidated net worth and a defined minimum interest
coverage ratio. In addition, the facility agreements establish a limit on the
aggregate amount of consolidated debt the Company and its subsidiaries may
incur. There were no borrowings outstanding under these agreements at December
31, 2000. These revolving credit facilities support, among other things, the
Company's commercial paper program and certain uncommitted short term bank
facilities.


50
53
OTHER FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Throughout 2000, the Company sold certain domestic accounts receivable
under a continuous sale program. Under the program, undivided interests in
designated receivable pools were sold to purchasers with recourse limited to the
receivables purchased. At December 31, 2000 and 1999, the level of net proceeds
from sales under the program was $550 million. The volume of receivables sold
under this program totaled $3.7 billion during 2000.

The Board of Directors of the Company approved a three year share
repurchase program in 1999, whereunder the Company may acquire up to $600
million of outstanding Common Stock of the Company. The program is designed to
give the Company better flexibility in funding future acquisitions and to
optimize shareholder value. No shares were repurchased during 2000 or 1999.
During 1998, 1,500,000 shares were repurchased under a similar program at an
average cost of $56.82.

For further information on financing activities, refer to the note to
the financial statements No. 11, Financing Arrangements and Derivative Financial
Instruments.

Funds generated by operations, together with funds available under
existing credit arrangements, are expected to be sufficient to meet the
Company's currently anticipated operating cash requirements.

ITEM 7(A). QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

INTEREST RATE RISK

The Company actively manages its fixed and floating rate debt mix,
within defined limitations, using refinancings and unleveraged interest rate
swaps. The Company will enter into fixed and floating interest rate swaps to
alter its exposure to the impact of changing interest rates on consolidated
results of operations and future cash outflows for interest. Fixed rate swaps
are used to reduce the Company's risk of increased interest costs during periods
of rising interest rates. Floating rate swaps are used to convert the fixed
rates of long term borrowings into short term variable rates. Interest rate swap
contracts are thus used by the Company to separate interest rate risk management
from the debt funding decision. At December 31, 2000, the interest rate on 48%
of the Company's debt was fixed by either the nature of the obligation or
through the interest rate contracts, compared to 28% at December 31, 1999.
Interest rate lock contracts are used to hedge the risk-free rate component of
anticipated long term debt issuances. No interest rate lock contracts were
outstanding at December 31, 2000.

The following tables present information at December 31:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 2000 1999
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Interest Rate Exchange Contracts
Fair value - asset $ -- $ .5
Carrying amount - (liability) (.2) --
Pro forma fair value - (liability) (.2) (.1)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest Rate Lock Contracts
U.S. dollar contracts
Fair value - asset $ -- $ 5.5
Carrying amount -- --
Pro forma fair value - (liability) -- (3.0)
Euro contracts
Fair value - asset $ -- $ 1.4
Carrying amount -- --
Pro forma fair value - (liability) -- (.8)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>


51
54
The pro forma information assumes a 10% decrease in variable market
interest rates at December 31 of each year, and reflects the estimated fair
value of contracts outstanding at that date under that assumption.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 2000 1999
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
FIXED RATE DEBT
Fair value - liability $1,731.0 $ 812.7
Carrying amount - liability 1,776.5 836.0
Pro forma fair value - liability 1,801.3 855.4
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

The pro forma information assumes a 100 basis point decrease in market
interest rates at December 31 of each year, and reflects the estimated fair
value of fixed rate debt outstanding at that date under that assumption.

The sensitivity to changes in interest rates of the Company's interest
rate contracts and fixed rate debt was determined with a valuation model based
upon net modified duration analysis. The model assumes a parallel shift in the
yield curve, and the precision of the model decreases as the assumed change in
interest rates increases.

FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RISK

In order to reduce the impact of changes in foreign exchange rates on
consolidated results of operations and future foreign currency denominated cash
flows, the Company was a party to various foreign currency forward exchange
contracts at December 31, 2000 and 1999. These contracts reduce exposure to
currency movements affecting existing foreign currency denominated assets,
liabilities and firm commitments resulting primarily from trade receivables and
payables, equipment acquisitions, intercompany loans and the Company's foreign
currency-denominated borrowings in the U.S. The contract maturities match the
maturities of the currency positions. Changes in the fair value of forward
exchange contracts are substantially offset by changes in the fair value of the
hedged positions.

The following table presents information at December 31:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 2000 1999
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Fair value - favorable $ 24.0 $ 58.7
Carrying amount - asset 23.0 58.0
Pro forma change in fair value 33.3 13.1
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

The pro forma information assumes a 10% change in foreign exchange
rates at December 31 of each year, and reflects the estimated change in the fair
value of contracts outstanding at that date under that assumption.

The sensitivity to changes in exchange rates of the Company's foreign
currency positions was determined using current market pricing models.

For further information on interest rate contracts and foreign currency
exchange contracts, refer to the note to the financial statements No. 11,
Financing Arrangements and Derivative Financial Instruments.


52
55
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.


INDEX


CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
Report of Independent Accountants ........................... 53
Consolidated Statement of Income -- years ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 ........................... 54
Consolidated Balance Sheet -- December 31, 2000 and 1999 .... 55
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity -- years ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 ........................... 56
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows -- years ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 ........................... 57
Notes to Financial Statements ............................... 58
Supplementary Data (unaudited) .............................. 81
Financial Statement Schedules ............................... FS-1
</TABLE>

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the
accompanying index on this page present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Subsidiaries at
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in
the accompanying index presents fairly, in all material respects, the
information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related
consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial
statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management; our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with
auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

As discussed in Note 7 to the financial statements, the Company changed
its method of accounting for domestic inventories in 2000.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


Cleveland, Ohio
February 5, 2001


53
56
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in millions, except per share)
Year Ended December 31, 2000 1999 1998
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Sales (Note 1) $ 14,417.1 $ 13,355.4 $ 13,081.6
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost of Goods Sold (Note 1) 11,637.3 10,832.3 10,210.2
Selling, Administrative and General Expense 2,237.3 2,016.7 1,881.1
Rationalizations (Note 3) 124.1 171.6 (29.7)
Interest Expense (Note 17) 282.6 179.4 147.8
Other (Income) and Expense (Note 4) 27.8 (147.1) (76.5)
Foreign Currency Exchange (6.7) (27.6) (2.6)
Equity in Earnings of Affiliates 22.4 (10.3) (10.6)
Minority Interest in Net Income of Subsidiaries 33.5 40.3 31.5
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes 58.8 300.1 930.4
United States and Foreign Taxes on Income (Note 16) 18.5 56.9 258.2
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income from Continuing Operations 40.3 243.2 672.2
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discontinued Operations (Note 22) -- -- (34.7)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Income $ 40.3 $ 243.2 $ 637.5
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE -- BASIC:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income from Continuing Operations $ .26 $ 1.55 $ 4.29
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discontinued Operations -- -- (.22)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Income $ .26 $ 1.55 $ 4.07
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Shares Outstanding (Note 12) 156,840,646 156,182,004 156,570,476

INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE -- DILUTED:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income from Continuing Operations $ .25 $ 1.53 $ 4.25
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discontinued Operations -- -- (.22)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Income $ .25 $ 1.53 $ 4.03
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Shares Outstanding (Note 12) 158,764,926 158,939,599 158,307,212
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this financial statement.


54
57
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in millions)
December 31, 2000 1999
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 252.9 $ 241.3
Accounts and notes receivable (Note 5) 2,074.7 2,296.3
Inventories (Note 7) 2,879.7 2,570.0
Sumitomo 1.2% Convertible Note Receivable Due 8/00 (Note 8) -- 107.2
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 259.9 165.1
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Current Assets 5,467.2 5,379.9
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Long Term Accounts and Notes Receivable 92.8 97.7
Investments in Affiliates, at equity 102.0 115.4
Other Assets (Note 8) 183.8 79.0
Goodwill (Note 6) 588.4 516.9
Deferred Charges 1,612.8 1,328.2
Properties and Plants (Note 9) 5,521.0 5,761.0
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Assets $13,568.0 $13,278.1
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LIABILITIES
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable-trade $ 1,505.2 $ 1,417.5
Compensation and benefits (Notes 14, 15) 823.6 794.5
Other current liabilities 395.6 294.5
United States and foreign taxes 208.4 249.0
Notes payable to banks (Note 11) 1,077.0 862.3
Sumitomo 1.2% Convertible Note Payable Due 8/01 (Note 8) 56.9 127.8
Long term debt due within one year 159.2 214.3
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Current Liabilities 4,225.9 3,959.9
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Long Term Debt (Note 11) 2,349.6 2,347.9
Compensation and Benefits (Notes 14, 15) 2,310.5 2,137.4
Other Long Term Liabilities 334.1 149.1
Minority Equity in Subsidiaries 844.9 891.2
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Liabilities 10,065.0 9,485.5
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred Stock, no par value: Authorized, 50,000,000 shares, unissued -- --
Common Stock, no par value: Authorized, 300,000,000 shares
Outstanding shares, 157,603,962 (156,335,120 in 1999) 157.6 156.3
Capital Surplus 1,092.4 1,029.6
Retained Earnings 3,558.8 3,706.9
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Note 21) (1,305.8) (1,100.2)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Shareholders' Equity 3,503.0 3,792.6
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity $13,568.0 $13,278.1
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this financial statement.


55
58
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Accumulated
Common Stock Other Total
------------------------ Capital Retained Comprehensive Shareholders'
(Dollars in millions, except per share) Shares Amount Surplus Earnings Income Equity
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at December 31, 1997 as reported 156,588,783 $156.6 $1,061.6 $2,983.4 $ (806.1) $3,395.5
(after deducting 39,089,885 treasury shares)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cumulative effect on prior years of change
in inventory costing method (Note 7) 218.2 218.2
Comprehensive income:
Net income 637.5
Foreign currency translation (99.6)
Minimum pension liability (net of tax of $.2) 1.9
Total comprehensive income 539.8
Cash dividends -- $1.20 per share (187.9) (187.9)
Common stock acquired (1,500,000) (1.5) (83.7) (85.2)
Common stock issued from treasury:
Stock compensation plans 854,752 .8 38.0 38.8
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1998 155,943,535 155.9 1,015.9 3,651.2 (903.8) 3,919.2
(after deducting 39,735,133 treasury shares)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:
Net income 243.2
Foreign currency translation (212.2)
Less reclassification adjustment for
recognition of FCTA in net income due
to the sale of subsidiaries 17.6
Minimum pension liability (net of tax of $6.3) 11.0
Unrealized investment loss (net of tax of $7.8) (12.8)
Total comprehensive income 46.8
Cash dividends -- $1.20 per share (187.5) (187.5)
Common stock issued from treasury:
Stock compensation plans 391,585 .4 13.7 14.1
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1999 156,335,120 156.3 1,029.6 3,706.9 (1,100.2) 3,792.6
(after deducting 39,343,548 treasury shares)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:
Net income 40.3
Foreign currency translation (201.7)
Minimum pension liability (net of tax of $4.1) (6.7)
Unrealized investment gain (net of tax of $1.7) 2.8
Total comprehensive income (165.3)
Cash dividends -- $1.20 per share (188.4) (188.4)
Common stock issued from treasury:
Conversion of 1.2% Convertible Note Payable 1,138,030 1.1 58.8 59.9
Stock compensation plans 130,812 .2 4.0 4.2
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2000 157,603,962 $157.6 $1,092.4 $3,558.8 $(1,305.8) $3,503.0
(after deducting 38,074,706 treasury shares)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this financial statement.


56
59
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2000 1999 1998
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Income $ 40.3 $ 243.2 $ 637.5
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash
flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 630.3 581.7 505.9
Deferred tax provision (138.9) (141.0) 117.4
Discontinued operations (Note 22) -- -- 49.5
Rationalizations (Note 3) 100.1 132.5 (19.6)
Asset sales (Note 4) (3.2) (154.8) (75.8)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net
of acquisitions and dispositions:
Accounts and notes receivable 136.0 13.4 35.6
Inventories (382.6) 273.4 (243.1)
Accounts payable -- trade 139.9 (83.4) (74.6)
Domestic pension funding (5.3) (47.3) (83.5)
Other assets and liabilities (6.8) (183.0) (410.2)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total adjustments 469.5 391.5 (198.4)
Total cash flows from operating activities 509.8 634.7 439.1
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures (614.5) (805.0) (838.4)
Short term securities acquired (24.4) (54.2) (18.3)
Short term securities redeemed 26.1 59.5 18.6
Asset dispositions 172.6 49.5 493.3
Asset acquisitions (Notes 2, 8) -- (892.0) (217.9)
Other transactions (28.2) (159.8) (138.8)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total cash flows from investing activities (468.4) (1,802.0) (701.5)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Short term debt incurred 1,199.2 2,111.8 447.4
Short term debt paid (1,908.2) (727.1) (98.8)
Long term debt incurred 1,145.9 20.5 325.4
Long term debt paid (229.2) (48.7) (193.4)
Common stock issued (Notes 8, 12) 4.2 14.1 38.8
Common stock acquired -- -- (85.2)
Joint venture dividends paid to Sumitomo (27.1) -- --
Dividends paid to Goodyear shareholders (188.4) (187.5) (187.9)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total cash flows from financing activities (3.6) 1,183.1 246.3
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents (26.2) (13.5) (3.5)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 11.6 2.3 (19.6)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of the Period 241.3 239.0 258.6
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of the Period $ 252.9 $ 241.3 $ 239.0
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this financial statement.


57
60
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1

ACCOUNTING POLICIES

A summary of the significant accounting policies used in the preparation of the
accompanying financial statements follows:

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all majority-owned
subsidiaries in which no substantive participating rights are held by minority
shareholders. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.

The Company's investments in majority-owned subsidiaries in which
substantive participating rights are held by minority shareholders and in 20% to
50% owned companies in which it has the ability to exercise significant
influence over operating and financial policies are accounted for using the
equity method. Accordingly, the Company's share of the earnings of these
companies is included in consolidated net income. Investments in other companies
are carried at cost.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

Revenues are recognized when finished products are shipped to unaffiliated
customers and both title and the risks and rewards of ownership are transferred,
or services have been rendered and accepted. Appropriate provision is made for
uncollectible accounts.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and in the bank as well as all
short term securities held for the primary purpose of general liquidity. Such
securities normally mature within three months from the date of acquisition.
Cash flows associated with items intended as hedges of identifiable transactions
or events are classified in the same category as the cash flows from the items
being hedged.

INVENTORY PRICING

During the fourth quarter of 2000, the Company changed its method of inventory
costing from last-in first-out (LIFO) to first-in first-out (FIFO) for domestic
inventories. Prior periods have been restated to reflect this change. Worldwide
inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using
FIFO or the average cost method. Refer to Note 7.

INCOME TAXES

Income taxes are recognized during the year in which transactions enter into the
determination of financial statement income, with deferred taxes being provided
for temporary differences between amounts of assets and liabilities for
financial reporting purposes and such amounts as measured by tax laws. Refer to
Note 16.

INVESTMENTS

Investments in marketable equity securities are stated at fair value. Fair value
is determined using quoted market prices at the end of the reporting period and,
when appropriate, exchange rates at that date. Unrealized gains and losses on
marketable equity securities classified as available-for-sale are recorded in
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, net of tax. Refer to Notes 8, 21.

GOODWILL

Goodwill is recorded when the cost of acquired businesses exceeds the fair value
of the identifiable net assets acquired. Goodwill is amortized over its
estimated useful life, based on an evaluation of all relevant factors.
Substantially all goodwill resulting from the strategic alliance with Sumitomo
and other acquisitions in North America and the European Union is amortized on a
straight-line basis over 40 years. Goodwill resulting from acquisitions in
emerging markets is amortized on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from
20 - 40 years. The carrying amount and estimated useful life of goodwill are
reviewed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that revisions may
be warranted. Refer to Note 6.

PROPERTIES AND PLANTS

Properties and plants are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed using the
straight-line method. Accelerated depreciation is used for income tax purposes,
where permitted. Refer to Note 9.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Compensation cost for stock options is measured as the excess, if any, of the
quoted market price of the Company's common stock at the date of the grant over
the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. Compensation cost for
stock appreciation rights and performance units is recorded based on the quoted
market price of the Company's stock at the end of the reporting period. Refer to
Note 12.

ADVERTISING COSTS

Costs incurred for producing and communicating advertising are generally
expensed when incurred. Costs incurred under the Company's domestic cooperative
advertising program with dealers and franchisees are recorded subsequent to the
first time the advertising takes place, as related revenues are recognized.
Refer to Note 19.

FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION

Financial statements of international subsidiaries are translated into U.S.
dollars using the exchange rate at each balance sheet date for assets and
liabilities and a weighted-average exchange rate for each period for revenues,
expenses, gains and losses. Where the local currency is the functional currency,
translation adjustments are recorded as Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.
Where the U.S. dollar is the functional currency, translation adjustments are
recorded in income.


58
61

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Derivative financial instrument contracts are utilized by the Company to manage
interest rate and foreign exchange risks. The Company has established a control
environment that includes policies and procedures for risk assessment and the
approval, reporting and monitoring of derivative financial instrument
activities. Company policy prohibits holding or issuing derivative financial
instruments for trading purposes.

The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, as
amended and interpreted, on January 1, 2001. Results of operations and financial
position in this Annual Report do not reflect the adoption of this standard.

To qualify for hedge accounting, the contracts must meet defined correlation
and effectiveness criteria, be designated as hedges and result in cash flows and
financial statement effects which substantially offset those of the position
being hedged. Amounts receivable or payable under derivative financial
instrument contracts, when recognized are reported on the Consolidated Balance
Sheet as both current and long term receivables or liabilities.

Interest Rate Contracts -- The differentials to be received or paid under
interest rate exchange contracts are recognized in income over the life of the
contracts as adjustments to Interest Expense. The settlement amounts received or
paid under interest rate lock contracts are recognized in income over the life
of the associated debt as adjustments to interest expense.

Foreign Exchange Contracts -- As exchange rates change, gains and losses on
contracts designated as hedges of existing assets and liabilities are recognized
in income as Foreign Currency Exchange, while gains and losses on contracts
designated as hedges of net investments in foreign subsidiaries are recognized
in Shareholders' Equity as Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. Gains and
losses on contracts designated as hedges of identifiable foreign currency firm
commitments are not recognized until included in the measurement of the related
foreign currency transaction.

Gains and losses on terminations of hedge contracts are recognized as Other
(Income) and Expense when terminated in conjunction with the termination of the
hedged position, or to the extent that such position remains outstanding,
deferred as Prepaid Expenses or Deferred Charges and amortized to Interest
Expense or Foreign Currency Exchange over the remaining life of that position.
Derivative financial instruments that the Company temporarily continues to hold
after the early termination of a hedged position, or that otherwise no longer
qualify for hedge accounting, are marked-to-market, with gains and losses
recognized in income as Other (Income) and Expense. Refer to Note 11.

ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP MATTERS

The Company expenses environmental expenditures related to existing conditions
resulting from past or current operations and from which no current or future
benefit is discernible. Expenditures that extend the life of the related
property or mitigate or prevent future environmental contamination are
capitalized.

The Company determines its liability on a site by site basis and records a
liability at the time when it is probable and can be reasonably estimated. The
Company's estimated liability is reduced to reflect the anticipated
participation of other potentially responsible parties in those instances where
it is probable that such parties are legally responsible and financially capable
of paying their respective shares of the relevant costs. The estimated liability
of the Company is not discounted or reduced for possible recoveries from
insurance carriers. Refer to Note 23.

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and related
notes to financial statements. Changes in such estimates may affect amounts
reported in future periods.

PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK

Basic earnings per share have been computed based on the average number of
common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share reflects the dilutive
impact of outstanding stock options, computed using the treasury stock method,
the Company's 1.2% Convertible Note Payable Due 8/01 and performance units. All
earnings per share amounts in these notes to financial statements are diluted,
unless otherwise noted. Refer to Note 12.

RECLASSIFICATION

During 2000, the Company began reporting expenses for transportation of products
to customers as a component of Cost of Goods Sold as a result of the adoption of
EITF Issue No. 00-10, "Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs".
These costs had previously been reported as a reduction of Net Sales.
Transportation costs totaled $526.2 million, $474.9 million and $455.3 million
in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Additionally, the Company began reporting
equity in earnings of affiliates separately on the Consolidated Statement of
Income. Prior periods have been reclassified to reflect these changes.

Certain other items previously reported in specific financial statement
captions have been reclassified to conform to the 2000 presentation.


59
62

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

NOTE 2
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

STRATEGIC ALLIANCE

On September 1, 1999, the Company commenced operations under a global alliance
with Sumitomo Rubber Industries Ltd. ("Sumitomo") which included, among other
things, the formation of tire manufacturing and sales joint ventures. In
addition to its businesses contributed to the joint ventures, the Company paid
$931.6 million to Sumitomo and its affiliates, which was financed by the
issuance of additional debt.

Under the global alliance agreements, the Company acquired 75%, and Sumitomo
owned 25%, of Goodyear Dunlop Tires Europe B.V., a Netherlands holding company.
Concurrently, the holding company acquired substantially all of Sumitomo's tire
businesses in Europe, including eight tire manufacturing plants located in
England, France and Germany and sales and distribution operations in 18 European
countries, and most of the Company's tire businesses in Europe. Excluded from
the European joint venture are the Company's tire businesses in Poland (other
than a sales company), Slovenia and Turkey (as well as Morocco and South
Africa), the Company's aircraft tire businesses, and the Company's textile,
steel tire cord and tire mold manufacturing plants, a technical center and
related facilities located in Luxembourg.

The Company also acquired 75%, and Sumitomo acquired 25%, of Goodyear Dunlop
Tires North America Ltd., a holding company that purchased Sumitomo's tire
manufacturing operations in North America and certain of its related tire sales
and distribution operations. In addition, the Company acquired 100% of the
balance of Sumitomo's Dunlop Tire distribution and sales operations in the
United States and Canada. The Company also acquired a 25% (and Sumitomo acquired
a 75%) equity interest in each of two tire companies in Japan, one for the
distribution and sale of Goodyear-brand passenger and truck tires in the
replacement market in Japan and the other for the distribution and sale of
Goodyear-brand and Dunlop-brand tires to original equipment manufacturers in
Japan. The Company transferred certain assets of its subsidiary located in Japan
in exchange for such equity interests and approximately $27 million in cash.

The Company also acquired a 51% (and Sumitomo acquired a 49%) equity
interest in a company that will coordinate and disseminate commercialized tire
technology among the Company, Sumitomo, the joint ventures and their respective
affiliates, and an 80% (and Sumitomo acquired a 20%) equity interest in a global
purchasing company. The global alliance Agreements also provided for the
investment by the Company and Sumitomo in the common stock of the other. Refer
to Note 8.

The Company accounted for the strategic alliance using the purchase method.
The cost of the acquired businesses totaled approximately $1.24 billion,
including the cash payment of $931.6 million and the fair value of 25% of the
Goodyear businesses contributed to the European joint venture, or $307 million.
In addition, the Dunlop businesses contributed by Sumitomo included $130 million
of debt. The Company will amortize substantially all of the approximately $367
million of goodwill recorded on a straight-line basis over 40 years. The Company
recognized a gain of $149.7 million ($143.7 million after tax or $.90 per share)
on the change of control of 25% of the businesses it contributed to the European
joint venture.

The following table presents supplemental pro forma estimated results of
operations for 1999 and 1998 as if the joint ventures had commenced operations
on January 1, 1998. Historical results of the acquired businesses have been
adjusted to exclude non-recurring items and to reflect changes in the carrying
amounts and depreciable lives of certain fixed assets. The pro forma information
also reflects amortization of goodwill recorded by the Company and interest
expense at 6% associated with the debt incurred to finance the Company's cash
payment of $931.6 million to Sumitomo and its affiliates.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------
(In millions, except per share) 1999 1998
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Unaudited) (Unaudited)
<S> <C> <C>
Net Sales $14,970.1 $15,600.0
Net Income $ 243.7 $ 631.6
Net Income Per Share -- Basic $ 1.56 $ 4.03
Net Income Per Share -- Diluted $ 1.53 $ 3.99
</TABLE>


60
63

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

NOTE 3
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RATIONALIZATIONS

The net amounts of rationalization charges (credits) to income by quarter for
the periods indicated were as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
------------------------------------
(In millions) 2000 1999 1998
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
First Quarter $ -- $ 167.4 $ --
Second Quarter 4.7 (9.6) (29.7)
Third Quarter 1.2 6.1 --
Fourth Quarter 118.2 7.7 --
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 124.1 $ 171.6 $ (29.7)
===================================================================
</TABLE>

2000 Rationalization Actions -- The Company recorded rationalization charges
totaling $118.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2000 ($93.7 million after tax
or $.59 per share) related to global workforce reductions and manufacturing
facility consolidations in Europe, Latin America and Asia. The Company also
recorded rationalization charges totaling $1.2 million in the third quarter of
2000 ($1.2 million after tax or $.01 per share) related to the closing of its
tire manufacturing facility in Italy initiated in 1999 (which is for negotiated
benefits accepted in the third quarter of 2000). The Company recorded net
rationalization charges totaling $4.7 million ($5.2 million after tax or $.03
per share) in the second quarter of 2000 related to the closing of the Italian
manufacturing facility (which is for negotiated benefits accepted in the second
quarter of 2000) and associate reductions due to sales office consolidation in
Europe following the Company's Dunlop acquisition. In the fourth quarter of
1999, the Company took a charge for the closure of the Italian facility, however
that charge did not include certain associate benefit amounts that had not been
negotiated at that time.

1999 Rationalization Actions -- The table below sets forth by quarter for
the periods indicated the rationalization plans adopted in the quarter and any
reversals of, or other adjustments to, prior rationalization plans credited or
charged in such quarter:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31, 1999
-------------------------------------------
Rationalization Reversals Net Charge
Action and (Credit)
(In millions) Recorded Adjustments Recorded
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
First Quarter $167.4 $ -- $167.4
Second Quarter -- (9.6) (9.6)
Third Quarter 46.5 (40.4) 6.1
Fourth Quarter 26.2 (18.5) 7.7
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
$240.1 $(68.5) $171.6
==================================================================
</TABLE>

The 1999 rationalization programs are described below. The reversals recorded
during 1999 totaled $68.5 million ($45.2 million after tax or $.29 per share).
The reversals included $44.7 million related to the decision to resume
production of certain passenger tire lines in a portion of the Gadsden facility
due to higher-than-expected demand in North America and the high cost and time
delays associated with installing additional capacity at other plants. Of the
$44.7 million, $38.9 million related to pension curtailment costs and associate
severance costs not required and $5.8 million related primarily to
noncancellable contracts again utilized due to the partial resumption of
passenger tire manufacturing at Gadsden. The reversals also included $6.8
million related to the decision to abandon the planned relocation of certain
agricultural tire production to Turkey due to the rationalization opportunities
presented by the joint venture with Sumitomo and production difficulties in
Turkey following a major earthquake. The remaining $17.0 million of the
reversals resulted from the evaluation of the reserves at each balance sheet
date and the identification of amounts no longer needed for their originally
intended purposes, primarily related to the 1997 and 1996 rationalization
programs.

1998 Rationalization Actions -- The Company did not adopt any
rationalization plans during 1998. In the 1998 second quarter the Company
recorded a reversal of $29.7 million of charges originally made in respect of
the 1997 rationalization program, which consisted of $22.0 million resulting
from favorable settlement of obligations related to the Company's exit from the
Formula 1 racing series and $7.7 million related to plant downsizing and closure
activities in North America.


61
64

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

2000 Program -- The Company committed to rationalization actions in the
second and fourth quarters to reduce costs and increase productivity and
efficiency. These actions consisted of global workforce reductions and
manufacturing facility consolidations in Europe, Latin America and Asia. The
Company recorded charges totaling $119.4 million ($95.0 million after tax or
$.59 per share), of which $86.4 million related to future cash outflows,
primarily for associate severance costs and $33.0 million related to non-cash
writeoffs. The balance of the provisions recorded under the 2000 program totaled
$82.0 million at December 31, 2000.

Associate-related rationalization costs totaling $92.6 million were recorded
and incurred during 2000 as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Balance at
(In millions) Recorded Incurred 12/31/00
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Plant downsizing and consolidation $51.5 $(3.5) $48.0
Worldwide associate reductions 41.1 (15.9) 25.2
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
$92.6 $(19.4) $73.2
========================================================================
</TABLE>

Under the 2000 program, the Company provided for the release of approximately
5,600 associates around the world, primarily production and support associates
in Europe, Latin America and Asia. During 2000, approximately 500 associates in
Latin American and European operations were released at a cost of $19.4 million.
The Company plans to release approximately 5,100
more associates under the above programs during 2001.

Rationalization costs, other than associate-related costs, totaling $26.8
million were recorded and incurred in 2000 as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Balance at
(In millions) Recorded Incurred 12/31/00
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Plant downsizing and consolidation $26.8 $(18.0) $8.8
==========================================================================
</TABLE>

Plant downsizing and consolidation costs were primarily for the writeoff of
scrapped equipment taken out of service in Latin America and Europe and for
noncancellable lease costs. The Company plans to complete these actions during
2001.

1999 Program -- The Company committed to a number of rationalization actions
in the first, third and fourth quarters of 1999 totaling $240.1 million ($177.7
million after tax or $1.13 per share). The balance of the provisions recorded
under the 1999 program totaled $4.3 million and $41.2 million at December 31,
2000 and December 31, 1999, respectively.

The Company also recorded charges under this program of $6.0 million in the
second, third and fourth quarters of 2000, related to the closure of the
Company's manufacturing facility in Italy for associates that accepted
negotiated benefits in those respective periods.

Associate-related rationalization costs totaling $171.6 million were
recorded in 1999. Activity during 2000 is presented below:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Balance at 2000 Balance at
(In millions) 12/31/99 Charges Incurred 12/31/00
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
North American Tire
staffing $11.1 $ -- $(9.9) $ 1.2
European associate
reductions 6.2 6.0 (9.1) 3.1
Asset sales and other
exit costs 5.8 (.5) (5.3) --
Termination of tire
production 5.6 -- (5.6) --
Plant downsizing and
consolidation .4 -- (.4) --
Withdrawal of support
for CART/IRL .3 -- (.3) --
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
$29.4 $ 5.5 $(30.6) $ 4.3
=======================================================================
</TABLE>

Under the above programs, approximately 450 associates were released in 2000 at
a cost of $30.6 million. These associates were primarily hourly and staff
associates in Italy and production and support associates at a Latin American
facility. Associate reductions under the above programs have been completed,
with the exception of approximately 350 more Italian manufacturing associates to
be released during 2001.

Rationalization costs, other than associate-related costs, totaling $68.5
million were recorded in 1999. Activity during 2000 follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Balance at 2000 Balance at
(In millions) 12/31/99 Charges Incurred 12/31/00
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Withdrawal of support
for CART/IRL $ 9.5 $ (.7) $(8.8) $ --
Termination of tire
production 2.1 -- (2.1) --
Plant downsizing and
consolidation .1 -- (.1) --
Asset sales and other
exit costs .1 (.1) -- --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$11.8 $ (.8) $(11.0) $ --
==============================================================================
</TABLE>

The Company has completed the actions under the above programs.


62
65

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


DUNLOP RATIONALIZATIONS

The following rationalization actions have been recorded as adjustments to the
purchase price allocation in respect of the acquired Dunlop businesses, and did
not affect the Consolidated Statement of Income.

The Company committed to certain rationalization actions related to the
Dunlop businesses acquired from Sumitomo on September 1, 1999, for the purpose
of optimizing market growth opportunities and maximizing cost efficiencies. The
Company recorded costs in 1999 and 2000 totaling $67.1 million, substantially
all of which were for future cash outflows. Under these rationalization
programs, associate-related costs for the release or relocation of approximately
2,000 production, support, technical, retail and administrative associates
totaling $52.8 million were recorded, and rationalization costs, other than
associate-related costs, totaling $14.3 million were recorded primarily for
lease cancellations and noncancellable leases. Through December 31, 2000, costs
totaling $38.9 million had been incurred. The remaining balance of these
provisions at December 31, 2000 totaled $28.2 million.

During 2000, associate-related costs totaling $48.4 million were recorded
for the release of approximately 1,900 associates. Approximately 1,200
associates were released during 2000 at a cost of $34.0 million. The Company
plans to release approximately 700 more associates under this program during
2001. The following table presents activity during 2000:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Balance at 2000 Balance at
(In millions) 12/31/99 Charges Incurred 12/31/00
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
$3.3 $48.4 $(34.0) $17.7
==========================================================================
</TABLE>

During 2000, rationalization costs, other than associate-related costs, totaling
$11.8 million were recorded. The following table presents activity during 2000:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Balance at 2000 Balance at
(In millions) 12/31/99 Charges Incurred 12/31/00
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
$2.1 $11.8 $ (3.4) $10.5
===========================================================================
</TABLE>

The Company has finalized and implemented the Dunlop integration plan. Although
the integration plan has been implemented, certain actions have not yet been
fully executed and will be completed in 2001.

NOTE 4
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

OTHER (INCOME) AND EXPENSE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 2000 1999 1998
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Asset sales $ (5.0) $(166.7) $(123.8)
Interest income (13.9) (16.3) (12.8)
Financing fees and
financial instruments 44.8 41.1 43.1
Lawsuit settlement -- -- 15.9
Miscellaneous 1.9 (5.2) 1.1
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 27.8 $(147.1) $ (76.5)
==========================================================================
</TABLE>

During 2000, the Company recorded a gain of $5.0 million ($3.2 million after tax
or $.02 per share) on the sale of land at a manufacturing facility in Mexico.
During 1999, the Company recorded a gain of $149.7 million ($143.7 million after
tax or $.90 per share) on the change in control of 25% of the European
businesses contributed to Goodyear Dunlop Tires Europe B.V. by the Company. In
addition, proceeds of $17.0 million ($11.1 million after tax or $.07 per share)
were realized in 1999 from the Company's sale of customer lists and formulations
in connection with its exit from the production of certain rubber chemicals. The
Company recorded gains in 1998 totaling $123.8 million ($76.4 million after tax
or $.48 per share) on the disposition of a latex processing facility in Georgia,
six distribution facilities in North America and certain other real estate.

Interest income consists of amounts earned on deposits, primarily from funds
invested in time deposits in Latin America and Asia, pending remittance or
reinvestment in the regions. At December 31, 2000, $93.2 million or 36.9% of the
Company's cash, cash equivalents and short term securities were concentrated in
Latin America, primarily Brazil ($90.3 million or 37.1% at December 31, 1999)
and $65.8 million or 26.0% were concentrated in Asia ($58.8 million or 24.2% at
December 31, 1999). Dividends received by the Company and domestic subsidiaries
from its consolidated international operations for 2000, 1999 and 1998 were
$102.2 million, $352.4 million and $215.9 million, respectively.

Financing fees and financial instruments consists primarily of fees paid
under the Company's domestic accounts receivable continuous sale programs. Refer
to Note 5.

In 1998, the Company recorded a charge of $15.9 million ($10.4 million after
tax or $.07 per share) for the settlement of several related lawsuits involving
employment matters in Latin America.


63
66

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


NOTE 5
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ACCOUNTS AND NOTES RECEIVABLE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 2000 1999
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Accounts and notes receivable $2,168.0 $2,378.2
Allowance for doubtful accounts (93.3) (81.9)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
$2,074.7 $2,296.3
==================================================================
</TABLE>

Throughout the year, the Company sold certain domestic accounts receivable under
a continuous sale program. Under the program, undivided interests in designated
receivable pools were sold to the purchaser with recourse limited to the
receivables purchased. At December 31, 2000 and 1999, the level of net proceeds
from sales under the program was $550 million. The volume of receivables sold
under this program totaled $3.7 billion during 2000. The balance of the
uncollected portion of receivables sold under that and other agreements was
$604.2 million at December 31, 2000 and $565.6 million at December 31, 1999.
Fees paid by the Company under these agreements are based on certain variable
market rate indices and are recorded as Other (Income) and Expense. Refer to
Note 4.


NOTE 6
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GOODWILL


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 2000 1999
- ----------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Goodwill $ 669.6 $ 572.4
Accumulated amortization (81.2) (55.5)
- ---------------------------------------------------------
$ 588.4 $ 516.9
=========================================================
</TABLE>

Amortization of goodwill totaled $25.7 million, $24.1 million and $18.1 million
in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.

NOTE 7
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

INVENTORIES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 2000 1999
- --------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Raw materials $ 480.4 $ 490.6
Work in process 123.5 124.0
Finished product 2,275.8 1,955.4
- --------------------------------------------------
$2,879.7 $2,570.0
==================================================
</TABLE>

During the fourth quarter of 2000, the Company changed its method of inventory
costing from last-in first-out (LIFO) to first-in first-out (FIFO) for domestic
inventories. Prior periods have been restated to reflect this change. The method
was changed in part to achieve a better matching of revenues and expenses. The
change increased net income in 2000 by $44.4 million ($.28 per basic and diluted
share), and increased retained earnings for years prior to 1998 by $218.2
million.

The following table presents the effect of the change on earnings for 1999
and 1998:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions, except per share) 1999 1998
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Income from Continuing Operations as reported $ 241.1 $ 717.0
Change in inventory costing method 2.1 (44.8)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income from Continuing Operations as restated 243.2 672.2
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discontinued Operations -- (34.7)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Income as restated $ 243.2 $ 637.5
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE - BASIC:
Income from Continuing Operations as reported $ 1.54 $ 4.58
Change in inventory costing method .01 (.29)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income from Continuing Operations as restated 1.55 4.29
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discontinued Operations -- (.22)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Income as restated $ 1.55 $ 4.07
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE - DILUTED:
Income from Continuing Operations as reported $ 1.52 $ 4.53
Change in inventory costing method .01 (.28)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income from Continuing Operations as restated 1.53 4.25
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discontinued Operations -- (.22)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Income as restated $ 1.53 $ 4.03
================================================================================
</TABLE>


64
67

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

NOTE 8
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

INVESTMENTS

INVESTMENTS

On February 25, 1999, the Company purchased at par from Sumitomo a 1.2%
Convertible Note Due August 16, 2000, in the principal amount of
Yen13,073,070,934 (the "Sumitomo Note"). The Sumitomo Note was convertible, if
not earlier redeemed, during the period beginning July 16, 2000 through August
15, 2000 into 24,254,306 shares of the Common Stock, Yen50 par value per share,
of Sumitomo at a conversion price of Yen539 per share, subject to certain
adjustments. On August 15, 2000, the Company converted the entire principal
amount of the Sumitomo Note into shares of the Common Stock of Sumitomo (the
"Sumitomo Investment"). The Company has classified the Sumitomo Investment as
available-for-sale, as provided in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities".

The fair value of the Sumitomo Investment was $100.9 million at December 31,
2000, and is included in Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes
in the fair value of the Sumitomo Investment are reported in the Consolidated
Balance Sheet as Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The Company's 1.2%
Convertible Note Payable Due August 16, 2001 in the principal amount of
Yen6,536,535,767 has been designated as a hedge of the exchange exposure of the
Sumitomo Investment. To the extent the hedge is effective, the effect of
exchange rate changes on the Company's Note are reported on the Consolidated
Balance Sheet as Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. At December 31, 2000
the gross unrealized holding loss on the Sumitomo Investment, net of the hedge,
totaled $16.1 million ($10.0 million after tax).

Effective January 1, 2001, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities", as amended and interpreted (SFAS 133). Pursuant to the adoption of
SFAS 133, effective January 1, 2001 the Company redesignated its 1.2%
Convertible Note Payable as a hedge of its investment in subsidiaries in Japan.

NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES

The Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows is presented net of the following
transactions:

In connection with the Company's strategic alliance with Sumitomo, on
February 25, 1999 the Company issued to Sumitomo at par its 1.2% Convertible
Note Due August 16, 2000, in the principal amount of Yen13,073,070,934 pursuant
to a Note Purchase Agreement dated February 25, 1999 (the "Note Agreement"). The
Company's Note was convertible during the period beginning July 16, 2000 through
August 15, 2000 into 2,281,115 shares of the Common Stock, without par value, of
the Company at a conversion price of Yen5,731 per share, subject to certain
adjustments. In addition, on February 25, 1999, the Company purchased at par
from Sumitomo a 1.2% Convertible Note Due August 16, 2000, in the principal
amount of Yen13,073,070,934 (the "Sumitomo Note"). The Sumitomo Note was
convertible, if not earlier redeemed, during the period beginning July 16, 2000
through August 15, 2000 into 24,254,306 shares of the Common Stock, Yen50 par
value per share, of Sumitomo at a conversion price of Yen539 per share, subject
to certain adjustments. The Company converted the Sumitomo Note in its entirety
on July 27, 2000 into 24,254,306 shares of the Common Stock of Sumitomo, which
represents 10% of Sumitomo's outstanding shares. The principal amount of each
Note was equivalent to $108.0 million at February 25, 1999.

On June 14, 1999, the Company and Sumitomo agreed that they would not redeem
the respective Notes and would convert the Notes, subject to the condition that
the global alliance between the Company and Sumitomo was operating at July 1,
2000. On July 7, 2000, the Company and Sumitomo amended the Note Agreement and
on August 15, 2000: (1) Sumitomo converted Yen6,536,535,167 principal amount of
the Note into approximately 1,138,030 shares of the Common Stock of the Company;
(2) the Company paid Yen223,933,167 of interest on the Note; and (3) Sumitomo
surrendered the Note and the Company issued a replacement note in the principal
amount of Yen6,536,535,767 due on August 16, 2001 and payable at the Company's
option in cash or in shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of Yen5,731,
subject to adjustment. The replacement note bears interest at the rate of 1.2%
per annum from August 15, 2000 until the fifteenth day prior to maturity (or, if
earlier, conversion) and is convertible into Common Stock of the Company at a
conversion price of Yen5,731 per share, subject to adjustment, at any time prior
to maturity.

The acquisition cost of the strategic alliance with Sumitomo in 1999
included the approximately $307 million fair value of 25% of the Company's
businesses contributed to the European joint venture. The Company also acquired
debt totaling $130 million in Dunlop's European and North American businesses.

In 2000, the Company acquired a majority ownership interest in a retreading
production and distribution operation in the United States, and recorded a
liability for the expected future payment of $72.5 million. In 1999, the
Company's Slovenian tire manufacturing subsidiary recorded fixed assets totaling
$43.4 million acquired under a capital lease. In 1998, the Company acquired a
majority ownership interest in an Indian tire manufacturer and assumed $103
million of debt.


65
68

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


NOTE 9
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PROPERTIES AND PLANTS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(In millions) Owned Capital Leases Total Owned Capital Leases Total
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Properties and plants, at cost:
Land and improvements $ 390.3 $ 20.7 $ 411.0 $ 445.4 $ 11.7 $ 457.1
Buildings and improvements 1,683.4 108.5 1,791.9 1,652.9 96.6 1,749.5
Machinery and equipment 8,537.5 92.3 8,629.8 8,234.8 148.3 8,383.1
Construction in progress 550.9 -- 550.9 722.7 -- 722.7
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11,162.1 221.5 11,383.6 11,055.8 256.6 11,312.4
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accumulated depreciation (5,785.5) (77.1) (5,862.6) (5,470.9) (80.5) (5,551.4)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 5,376.6 $ 144.4 $ 5,521.0 $ 5,584.9 $ 176.1 $ 5,761.0
===============================================================================================================================
</TABLE>

The weighted average useful lives of property used in arriving at the annual
amount of depreciation provided are as follows: buildings and improvements,
approximately 18 years; machinery and equipment, approximately 10 years.


NOTE 10
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LEASED ASSETS

Net rental expense charged to income follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 2000 1999 1998
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Gross rental expense $ 291.4 $ 260.4 $ 240.6
Sublease rental income (70.6) (72.5) (65.9)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 220.8 $ 187.9 $ 174.7
================================================================================
</TABLE>

The Company enters into capital and operating leases primarily for its vehicles,
data processing equipment and its wholesale and retail distribution facilities
under varying terms and conditions, including the Company's sublease of some of
its domestic retail distribution network to independent dealers. Many of the
leases provide that the Company will pay taxes assessed against leased property
and the cost of insurance and maintenance.

While substantially all subleases and some operating leases are cancelable
for periods beyond 2001, management expects that in the normal course of its
business nearly all of its independent dealer distribution network will be
actively operated. As leases and subleases for existing locations expire, the
Company would normally expect to renew the leases or substitute another more
favorable retail location.

The following table presents minimum future lease payments:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2006 and
(In millions) 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 beyond Total
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CAPITAL LEASES
Minimum lease payments $ 28.7 $ 9.0 $ 7.4 $ 6.1 $ 4.7 $ 25.7 $ 81.6
Minimum sublease rentals (.2) (.1) -- -- -- -- (.3)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 28.5 $ 8.9 $ 7.4 $ 6.1 $ 4.7 $ 25.7 $ 81.3
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Imputed interest (17.7)
Executory costs (1.4)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Present value $ 62.2
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATING LEASES
Minimum lease payments $ 358.9 $ 182.4 $ 142.9 $ 105.1 $ 103.2 $ 209.7 $1,102.2
Minimum sublease rentals (43.8) (35.8) (27.6) (19.2) (11.4) (18.2) (156.0)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 315.1 $ 146.6 $ 115.3 $ 85.9 $ 91.8 $ 191.5 $ 946.2
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Imputed interest (207.8)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Present value $ 738.4
=================================================================================================================================
</TABLE>


66
69

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


NOTE 11

FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS AND
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

SHORT TERM DEBT AND FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS

At December 31, 2000, the Company had short term committed and uncommitted
credit arrangements totaling $2.2 billion, of which $.93 billion were unused.
These arrangements are available to the Company or certain of its international
subsidiaries through various domestic and international banks at quoted market
interest rates. There are no commitment fees or compensating balances associated
with these arrangements. In addition, the Company maintains a commercial paper
program, whereunder the Company may have up to $1.5 billion outstanding at any
one time. Commercial paper totaling $297.7 million was outstanding at December
31, 2000.

Two credit facility agreements are available whereunder the Company may from
time to time borrow and have outstanding until March 31, 2001 up to U.S. $60
million at any one time with domestic and international banks. Under the terms
of the agreements, the Company may, upon payment of a fee at or prior to
borrowing, repay U.S. dollar borrowings in either U.S. dollars or a
predetermined equivalent amount of certain available European or Asian
currencies. Borrowings are discounted at rates equivalent to an average of 30
basis points over a three-month reserve adjusted LIBOR. There were no borrowings
outstanding under this agreement at December 31, 2000. The average amount
outstanding under similar agreements during 2000 was $28.6 million.

The Company had outstanding debt obligations, which by their terms are due
within one year, amounting to $1.74 billion at December 31, 2000. Commercial
paper, domestic short term bank debt and current maturities of long term debt
represented $947.3 million of this total, with a weighted average interest rate
of 7.04% at December 31, 2000. The remaining $788.8 million was short term debt
of international subsidiaries, with a weighted average interest rate of 6.52% at
December 31, 2000. Short term borrowings totaling $500 million were classified
as long term on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2000.

LONG TERM DEBT AND FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS

At December 31, 2000, the Company had long term credit arrangements totaling
$3.5 billion, of which $1.5 billion were unused.

The following table presents long term debt at December 31:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 2000 1999
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Swiss franc bonds:
5.375% due 2006 $ 96.7 $ 99.0
5.375% due 2000 -- 105.0
6.375% Eurobonds due 2005 371.1 --
Notes:
8 1/8% due 2003 299.7 --
6 5/8% due 2006 249.4 249.3
8 1/2% due 2007 300.0 --
6 3/8% due 2008 99.7 99.6
7% due 2028 148.9 148.9
Bank term loans due 2001 - 2005 151.4 147.8
Domestic short term borrowings 500.0 1,457.0
Other domestic and international debt 229.4 158.2
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
2,446.3 2,464.8
Capital lease obligations 62.5 97.4
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
2,508.8 2,562.2
Less portion due within one year 159.2 214.3
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
$2,349.6 $2,347.9
=======================================================================
</TABLE>

In addition to the amounts in the table above, on February 25, 1999 the Company
issued to Sumitomo Rubber Industries at par its 1.2% Convertible Note Due August
16, 2000, in the principal amount of Yen13,073,070,934 (equivalent to $127.8
million at December 31, 1999). The Company's Note was convertible, if not
earlier redeemed, during the period beginning July 16, 2000 through August 15,
2000 into 2,281,115 shares of the Common Stock, without par value, of the
Company at a conversion price of Yen5,731 per share, subject to certain
adjustments.


67
70

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


On July 7, 2000, the Company and Sumitomo amended the Purchase Agreement and
on August 15, 2000: (1) Sumitomo converted Yen6,536,535,167 principal amount of
the Note into approximately 1,138,030 shares of the Common Stock of the Company;
(2) the Company paid Yen223,933,167 of interest on the Note; and (3) Sumitomo
surrendered the Note and the Company issued a replacement note in the principal
amount of Yen6,536,535,767 due on August 16, 2001 (equivalent to $56.9 million
at December 31, 2000) and payable at the Company's option in cash or in shares
of Common Stock at a conversion price of Yen5,731, subject to adjustment. The
replacement note bears interest at the rate of 1.2% per annum from August 15,
2000 until the fifteenth day prior to maturity (or, if earlier, conversion) and
is convertible into Common Stock of the Company at a conversion price of
Yen5,731 per share, subject to adjustment, at any time prior to maturity. On
January 1, 2001, the Company designated its Note as a hedge of its investment in
subsidiaries in Japan. On January 15, 2001, Sumitomo gave notice to the Company
that it will convert the replacement note into approximately 1,140,866 shares of
Common Stock of the Company on February 6, 2001.

At December 31, 2000, the fair value of the Company's long term fixed rate
debt amounted to $1.73 billion, compared to its carrying amount of $1.78 billion
($812.7 million and $836.0 million, respectively, at December 31, 1999). The
difference was attributable primarily to the long term public bonds issued in
2000 and 1999. The fair value was estimated using quoted market prices or
discounted future cash flows. The fair value of the Company's variable rate debt
approximated its carrying amount at December 31, 2000 and 1999.

The Swiss franc bonds were hedged by foreign exchange contracts at December
31, 2000 and 1999, as discussed below.

The Company has designated Euro200 million principal amount of the Eurobonds
as hedging the exposure to the impact of Euro/U.S. dollar exchange rate
movements on the equity of certain of its subsidiaries in Europe. The remaining
Euro200 million principal amount is hedged by foreign exchange contracts, as
discussed below.

The Notes have an aggregate face amount of $1.1 billion and are reported net
of unamortized discount aggregating $2.3 million ($500.0 million and $2.2
million, respectively, at December 31, 1999).

The bank term loans due 2001 through 2005 are comprised of $11.4 million of
fixed rate agreements bearing interest at a weighted average rate of 5.18% and a
$140 million agreement bearing interest at a floating rate based upon LIBOR plus
a fixed spread, including a $50 million floating rate agreement that allows the
bank to terminate the loan in 2002 or convert the loan to a fixed interest rate
of 7.19% until maturity in 2005.

All commercial paper outstanding, which was issued for terms of less than
154 days, and certain domestic short term bank borrowings outstanding, which by
their terms are or were due within one year, are classified as long term debt on
the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2000 and 1999. These obligations
are supported by lending commitments under the two revolving credit facilities
described below. It is the Company's intent to maintain these debt obligations
as long term.

Other domestic and international debt consisted of fixed and floating rate
bank loans denominated in U.S. dollars and other currencies and maturing in 2001
- - 2008. The weighted average interest rate in effect under these loans was 7.73%
at December 31, 2000.

The Company is a party to two revolving credit facility agreements,
consisting of a $750 million five-year revolving credit facility and a $750
million 364-day revolving credit facility.

The $750 million five-year facility agreement is with 27 domestic and
international banks and provides that the Company may borrow at any time until
August 15, 2005, when the commitment terminates and any outstanding loans
mature. The Company pays a commitment fee ranging from 12.5 to 25 basis points
on the entire amount of the commitment (whether or not borrowed) and a usage fee
on amounts borrowed (other than on a competitive bid or prime rate basis)
ranging from 37.5 to 100 basis points. These fees may fluctuate quarterly within
these ranges based upon the Company's leverage. During 2000, commitment fees
ranged from 7.5 to 15 basis points and usage fees ranged from 22.5 to 45 basis
points. Commitment and usage fees paid during 2000 averaged 12.5 basis points.


68
71

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


The $750 million 364-day credit facility agreement is with 27 domestic and
international banks and provides that the Company may borrow until August 15,
2001, on which date the facility commitment terminates, except as it may be
extended on a bank by bank basis. If a bank does not extend its commitment if
requested to do so, the Company may obtain from such bank a two year term loan
up to the amount of such bank's commitment. The Company pays a commitment fee
ranging from 10 to 20 basis points on the entire amount of the commitment
(whether or not borrowed) and a usage fee on amounts borrowed (other than on a
competitive bid or prime rate basis) ranging from 40 to 105 basis points. These
fees may fluctuate quarterly within these ranges based upon the Company's
leverage. Under both agreements, a utilization fee of 25 basis points per annum
is charged each day on which the sum of the outstanding loans exceeds 50% of the
total facility.

Under both the five-year and the 364-day facilities, the Company may obtain
loans bearing interest at reserve adjusted LIBOR or a defined certificate of
deposit rate, plus in each case the applicable usage fee. In addition, the
Company may obtain loans based on the prime rate or at a rate determined on a
competitive bid basis. The facility agreements each contain certain covenants
which, among other things, require the Company to maintain at the end of each
fiscal quarter a minimum consolidated net worth and a defined minimum interest
coverage ratio. In addition, the facility agreements establish a limit on the
aggregate amount of consolidated debt the Company and its subsidiaries may
incur. There were no borrowings outstanding under these agreements at December
31, 2000.

The annual aggregate maturities of long term debt and capital leases for the
five years subsequent to 2000 are presented below. Maturities of debt supported
by the availability of the revolving credit agreements have been reported on the
basis that the commitments to lend under these agreements will be terminated
effective at the end of their current terms.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Debt incurred under
or supported by
revolving credit
agreements $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 500.0
Other 216.1 132.1 311.6 13.0 385.6
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 216.1 $ 132.1 $ 311.6 $ 13.0 $ 885.6
===================================================================================================
</TABLE>

Refer to Note 5 for additional information on financing arrangements. Refer to
Note 10 for additional information on capital lease obligations.

DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, as
amended and interpreted, on January 1, 2001. Results of operations and financial
position in this Annual Report do not reflect the adoption of this standard.

Interest Rate Exchange Contracts

The Company actively manages its fixed and floating rate debt mix, within
defined limitations, using refinancings and unleveraged interest rate swaps. The
Company will enter into fixed and floating interest rate swaps to hedge against
the effects of adverse changes in interest rates on consolidated results of
operations and future cash outflows for interest. Fixed rate swaps are used to
reduce the Company's risk of increased interest costs during periods of rising
interest rates. Floating rate swaps are used to convert the fixed rates of long
term borrowings into short term variable rates. Interest rate swap contracts are
thus used by the Company to separate interest rate risk management from the debt
funding decision. At December 31, 2000, the interest rate on 48% of the
Company's debt was fixed by either the nature of the obligation or through the
interest rate contracts, compared to 28% at December 31, 1999.

Contract information and weighted average interest rates follow. Current
market pricing models were used to estimate the fair values of interest rate
exchange contracts.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in millions) 12/31/99 Matured 12/31/00
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Fixed rate contracts:
Notional principal amount $ 75.0 $ 25.0 $ 50.0
Pay fixed rate 6.24% 6.21% 6.25%
Receive variable LIBOR 6.10 6.71 6.67
Average years to maturity 1.54 .9
Fair value: favorable $ .5 $ --
Carrying amount: (liability) -- (.2)
=============================================================================
</TABLE>


69
72

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


Weighted average information during the years 2000, 1999 and 1998 follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in millions) 2000 1999 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Fixed rate contracts:
Notional principal $ 71 $ 96 $ 111
Receive variable LIBOR 6.56% 5.26% 5.70%
Pay fixed rate 6.24 6.18 6.40
=============================================================================
</TABLE>

Interest Rate Lock Contracts

The Company will use, when appropriate, interest rate lock
contracts to hedge the risk-free rate component of anticipated long term debt
issuances. No contracts were outstanding at December 31, 2000.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in millions) 12/31/99 Matured 12/31/00
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
U.S. dollar contracts:
Notional $ 180 $ 180 $ --
Average contract rate 6.07% 6.07% --
Fair value $ 5.5 --
Carrying amount -- --
==========================================================================
Euro contracts:
Notional $ 101 $ 101 $ --
Average contract rate 4.61% 4.61% --
Fair value $ 1.4 --
Carrying amount -- --
==========================================================================
</TABLE>

Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts

In order to reduce the impact of changes in foreign exchange rates on
consolidated results of operations and future foreign currency denominated cash
flows, the Company was a party to various forward exchange contracts at December
31, 2000 and 1999. These contracts reduce exposure to currency movements
affecting existing foreign currency-denominated assets, liabilities and firm
commitments resulting primarily from trade receivables and payables, equipment
acquisitions, intercompany loans and the Company's foreign currency-denominated
borrowings in the U.S. (including the annual coupon payments).

A summary of forward exchange contracts in place at December 31 follows.
Current market pricing models were used to estimate the fair values of foreign
currency forward contracts. The contract maturities match the maturities of the
currency positions. The fair value of these contracts and the related currency
positions are subject to offsetting market risk resulting from foreign currency
exchange rate volatility.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999
---------------------------------------------------
Fair Contract Fair Contract
(In millions) Value Amount Value Amount
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Buy currency:
Swiss franc $106.1 $ 95.6 $212.5 $160.6
U.S. dollar 81.0 80.2 64.4 58.6
Euro 310.1 296.7 29.7 30.0
All other 7.0 7.5 23.1 23.1
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$504.2 $480.0 $329.7 $272.3
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contract maturity:
Swiss franc swap 3/06 10/00 - 3/06
Euro swap 6/05 -
All other 1/01 - 3/04 1/00 - 3/04
===============================================================================
Sell currency:
Euro $ 15.8 $ 15.6 $ 48.3 $ 49.6
Swedish krona 23.0 22.9 22.2 22.3
U.S. dollar 35.4 35.5 6.0 5.9
All other 6.3 6.3 4.7 4.7
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 80.5 $ 80.3 $ 81.2 $ 82.5
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contract maturity 1/01 - 3/01 1/00 - 3/00
Carrying amount --
asset (liability):
Swiss franc swap --
current $ -- $34.7
Swiss franc swap --
long term 19.0 21.4
Euro swap --
long term 3.2 --
Other - current .8 1.9
===============================================================================
</TABLE>

The counterparties to the Company's interest rate swap and
foreign exchange contracts were substantial and creditworthy multinational
commercial banks or other financial institutions which are recognized market
makers. Neither the risks of counterparty nonperformance nor the economic
consequences of counterparty nonperformance associated with these contracts were
considered by the Company to be material.


70
73

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


NOTE 12

STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS AND DILUTIVE SECURITIES

The Company's 1989 Goodyear Performance and Equity Incentive Plan and the 1997
Performance Incentive Plan of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company provide for the
granting of stock options and stock appreciation rights (SARs), restricted
stock, performance grants and other stock-based awards. For options granted in
tandem with SARs, the exercise of a SAR cancels the stock option; conversely,
the exercise of the stock option cancels the SAR. Stock options and related SARs
granted during 2000 generally have a maximum term of ten years and vest pro rata
over four years.

Performance units granted during 2000 are earned based on Return on Invested
Capital and Total Shareholder Return relative to the S&P Auto Parts & Equipment
Companies (each weighted at 50%) over a one, two or three year performance
period each beginning January 1, 2001. To the extent earned, a portion of the
performance units will generally be paid in cash (subject to deferral under
certain circumstances) and a portion may be automatically deferred for at least
five years in the form of units. Each unit is equivalent to a share of the
Company's Common Stock and payable in cash, shares of the Company's Common Stock
or a combination thereof at the election of the participant. A maximum of
15,000,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock are available for issuance
pursuant to grants and awards made under the 1997 Plan through December 31,
2001.

On December 4, 2000, the Company adopted The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
Stock Option Plan for Hourly Bargaining Unit Employees, under which options in
respect of up to 3,500,000 shares of the Common Stock of the Company may be
granted, and the Hourly and Salaried Employee Stock Option Plan, under which
options in respect of up to 600,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock may be
granted. Stock options granted during 2000 generally have a maximum term of ten
years and vest over one to three years.

Stock-based compensation activity for the years 2000, 1999 and 1998 follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999 1998
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shares SARs Shares SARs Shares SARs
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding at January 1 12,418,808 2,141,954 9,563,252 1,496,670 8,226,144 1,190,248
Options granted 6,793,071 689,170 3,371,948 716,643 2,204,021 434,487
Options without SARs exercised (36,900) -- (347,312) -- (754,246) --
Options with SARs exercised -- -- (44,126) (44,126) (115,202) (115,202)
SARs exercised (3,900) (3,900) (9,870) (9,870) (7,395) (7,395)
Options without SARs expired (227,913) -- (68,342) -- (53,283) --
Options with SARs expired (43,241) (43,241) (17,363) (17,363) (5,468) (5,468)
Performance units granted 478,200 -- 13,353 -- 100,474 --
Performance unit shares issued (127,871) -- (8,876) -- (8,629) --
Performance units cancelled (15,786) -- (33,856) -- (23,164) --
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Outstanding at December 31 19,234,468 2,783,983 12,418,808 2,141,954 9,563,252 1,496,670
Exercisable at December 31 8,105,308 1,312,398 5,741,778 847,358 3,801,049 494,230
Available for grant at December 31 3,419,218 7,433,575 10,755,666
===================================================================================================================================
</TABLE>

Significant option groups outstanding at December 31, 2000 and related weighted
average price and life information follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Grant Date Options Outstanding Options Exercisable Exercisable Price Remaining Life (Years)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
12/04/00 6,357,405 -- $17.68 10
12/06/99 3,189,216 879,960 32.00 9
11/30/98 2,075,289 1,165,385 57.25 8
12/02/97 1,817,689 1,448,156 63.50 7
12/03/96 1,530,966 1,530,996 50.00 6
1/09/96 1,194,014 1,194,014 44.00 5
1/04/95 669,811 669,811 34.75 4
All other 1,720,685 1,217,660 37.50 2
==================================================================================================================================
</TABLE>

The 1,720,685 options in the `All other' category were outstanding at exercise
prices ranging from $11.25 to $74.25, with a weighted average exercise price of
$33.91. All options and SARs were granted at an exercise price equal to the fair
market value of the Company's common stock at the date of grant.


71
74

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


Weighted average option exercise price information follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding at January 1 $ 45.63 $ 50.27 $ 46.86
Granted during the year 17.68 32.00 57.25
Exercised during the year 16.59 23.71 37.77
Outstanding at December 31 35.54 45.63 50.27
Exercisable at December 31 47.48 47.55 43.56
=============================================================================
</TABLE>

Forfeitures and cancellations were insignificant.

Weighted average fair values at date of grant for grants in 2000, 1999 and
1998 follow:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999 1998
- --------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Options $ 6.58 $ 12.85 $ 18.76
Performance units 19.00 51.62 57.25
====================================================================
</TABLE>

The above fair value of options at date of grant was estimated using the
Black-Scholes model with the following weighted average assumptions:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Expected life (years) 5 5 5
Interest rate 5.44% 5.97% 4.51%
Volatility 30.5 33.4 26.9
Dividend yield 2.81 2.12 1.92
=======================================================================
</TABLE>

The fair value of performance units at date of grant was equal to the market
value of the Company's common stock at that date.

Stock-based compensation costs reduced (increased) income as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions, except per share) 2000 1999 1998
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Pretax income $ .2 $ (12.4) $ 5.0
Net income .1 (7.7) 3.1
Net income per share -- (.05) .02
==================================================================================
</TABLE>

The following table presents the pro forma reduction in income that would have
been recorded had the fair values of options granted in each year been
recognized as compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the four-year
vesting period of each grant.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions, except per share) 2000 1999 1998
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Pretax income $ 33.9 $ 30.3 $ 26.7
Net income 25.3 23.2 22.5
Net income per share .16 .15 .14
==================================================================================
</TABLE>

Basic earnings per share have been computed based on the average number of
common shares outstanding. The following table presents the number of
incremental weighted average shares used in computing diluted per share amounts:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999 1998
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Average shares
outstanding -- basic 156,840,646 156,182,004 156,570,476
Stock options 213,443 758,437 1,484,463
Performance units -- 98,230 252,273
1.2% Convertible
Note Payable 1,710,837 1,900,928 --
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average shares
outstanding -- diluted 158,764,926 158,939,599 158,307,212
==================================================================================
</TABLE>

NOTE 13
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SAVINGS PLANS

Substantially all domestic associates are eligible to participate
in one of the Company's six savings plans. Under these plans associates elect to
contribute a percentage of their pay. In 2000, most plans provided for the
Company's matching of these contributions (up to a maximum of 6% of the
associate's annual pay or, if less, $10,500) at the rate of 50%. Company
contributions were $41.4 million, $43.0 million and $42.8 million for 2000, 1999
and 1998, respectively. A defined contributed pension plan for certain foreign
associates was established July 1, 1999. Company contributions were $.1 million
in 2000 and $2.4 million in 1999.


NOTE 14
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTRETIREMENT HEALTH CARE AND LIFE INSURANCE BENEFITS

The Company and its subsidiaries provide substantially all domestic associates
and associates at certain international subsidiaries with health care and life
insurance benefits upon retirement. Insurance companies provide life insurance
and certain health care benefits through premiums based on expected benefits to
be paid during the year. Substantial portions of the health care benefits for
domestic retirees are not insured and are paid by the Company. Benefit payments
are funded from operations.

Net periodic benefit cost follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 2000 1999 1998
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Service cost -- benefits
earned during the period $ 19.5 $ 21.5 $ 20.5
Interest cost 164.2 145.6 152.2
Amortization of unrecognized:
-- net losses 14.7 9.0 8.9
-- prior service cost (2.2) (2.3) (3.9)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 196.2 $ 173.8 $ 177.7
================================================================================
</TABLE>


72
75
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

The Company recognized a curtailment loss of $3.7 million and a special
termination loss of $1.4 million in 2000. During 1998, the Company recognized a
curtailment gain of $.3 million. Refer to Note 3.

The following table sets forth changes in the accumulated benefit
obligation and amounts recognized on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet at
December 31, 2000 and 1999:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 2000 1999
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
ACCUMULATED BENEFIT OBLIGATION:
Beginning balance $(2,124.3) $(2,173.3)
Service cost -- benefits earned (19.5) (21.5)
Interest cost (164.2) (145.6)
Plan amendments (3.0) (.5)
Actuarial gain (loss) (75.4) 158.7
Acquisitions -- (154.8)
Foreign currency translation 7.5 4.9
Curtailments (3.1) --
Associate contributions (2.2) (1.8)
Benefit payments 230.5 209.6
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ending balance (2,153.7) (2,124.3)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unrecognized net loss 313.5 255.3
Unrecognized prior service cost (23.1) (27.4)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accrued benefit liability recognized
on the Consolidated Balance Sheet $(1,863.3) $(1,896.4)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>


Of the accrued benefit liability recognized, $222.0 million and $168.0
million was included in current liabilities at December 31, 2000 and 1999,
respectively.

The following table presents significant assumptions used:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

U.S. International
----------------------
<S> <C> <C>
2000
Discount rate 8.0% 7.7%
Rate of increase in compensation levels 4.0 4.6
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1999
Discount rate 7.5% 8.3%
Rate of increase in compensation levels 4.0 5.4
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1998
Discount rate 7.0% 7.6%
Rate of increase in compensation levels 4.0 5.8
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>


A 7.25% annual rate of increase in the cost of health care benefits for retirees
under age 65 and a 5.0% annual rate of increase for retirees 65 years and older
is assumed in 2001. These rates gradually decrease to 5.0% in 2011 and remain at
that level thereafter. A 1% change in the assumed health care cost trend would
have increased (decreased) the accumulated benefit obligation at December 31,
2000 and the aggregate service and interest cost for the year then ended as
follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 1% Increase 1% Decrease
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Accumulated benefit obligation $19.9 $(19.1)
Aggregate service and interest cost 2.3 ( 2.1)
</TABLE>


NOTE 15
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PENSIONS
The Company and its subsidiaries provide substantially all associates with
pension benefits. The principal domestic hourly plan provides benefits based on
length of service. The principal domestic plans covering salaried associates
provide benefits based on final five-year average earnings formulas. Associates
making voluntary contributions to these plans receive higher benefits. Other
plans provide benefits similar to the principal domestic plans as well as
termination indemnity plans at certain international subsidiaries.

Net periodic pension cost follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 2000 1999 1998
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Service cost-benefits earned
during the period $ 119.6 $ 118.0 $ 104.4
Interest cost on projected
benefit obligation 353.0 314.6 280.4
Expected return on plan assets (470.7) (389.2) (334.2)
Amortization of unrecognized:
-- prior service cost 69.1 65.9 66.9
-- net (gains) losses (7.1) 14.2 6.9
-- transition amount .4 .3 1.2
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 64.3 $ 123.8 $ 125.6
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>


The Company recognized a settlement loss of $1.4 million, a curtailment loss of
$1.5 million and a special termination loss of $6.4 million during 2000. During
1999, the Company recognized a settlement gain of $12.5 million and a
curtailment loss of $6.2 million. During 1998, the Company recognized a
settlement loss of $6.6 million. Refer to Note 3.


73
76
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

The following table sets forth the funded status and amounts recognized on
the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2000 and 1999. At the
end of 2000 and 1999, assets exceeded accumulated benefits in certain plans and
accumulated benefits exceeded assets in others. Plan assets are invested
primarily in common stocks and fixed income securities.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 2000 1999
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
PROJECTED BENEFIT OBLIGATION:
Beginning balance $(4,878.1) $(4,154.8)
Service cost -- benefits earned (119.6) (118.0)
Interest cost (353.0) (314.6)
Plan amendments (248.6) (.6)
Actuarial loss 153.8 (5.8)
Associate contributions (23.6) (23.4)
Acquisitions -- (626.1)
Curtailments/settlements 6.7 6.3
Foreign currency translation 78.7 76.9
Benefit payments 332.3 282.0
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ending balance (5,051.4) (4,878.1)
Plan assets 4,749.6 5,178.9
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Projected benefit obligation in excess
of plan assets (301.8) 300.8
Unrecognized prior service cost 645.7 475.1
Unrecognized net gain (10.2) (440.6)
Unrecognized net obligation at transition 6.7 8.0
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net benefit cost recognized on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet $ 340.4 $ 343.3
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>


The following table presents significant assumptions used:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
U.S. International
------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
2000
Discount rate 8.0% 6.7%
Rate of increase in compensation levels 4.0 3.6
Expected long term rate of return on plan assets 9.5 8.6
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1999
Discount rate 7.5% 6.8%
Rate of increase in compensation levels 4.3 3.9
Expected long term rate of return on plan assets 9.5 8.8
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1998
Discount rate 7.0% 6.6%
Rate of increase in compensation levels 4.0 3.8
Expected long term rate of return on plan assets 9.5 8.7
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>


The following table presents amounts recognized on the Consolidated Balance
Sheet:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 2000 1999
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Prepaid benefit cost
-- current $ 92.0 $ 18.0
-- long term 549.5 598.6
Accrued benefit cost
-- current (72.7) (63.1)
-- long term (521.5) (242.6)
Intangible asset 259.4 8.9
Deferred income taxes 11.8 8.3
Accumulated other comprehensive income 21.9 15.2
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net benefit cost recognized on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet $ 340.4 $ 343.3
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>


The following table presents changes in plan assets:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 2000 1999
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Beginning balance $5,178.9 $3,931.2
Actual return on plan assets (117.2) 831.4
Company contributions 81.0 120.0
Associate contributions 23.6 23.4
Acquisitions -- 601.1
Settlements (7.8) (12.5)
Foreign currency translation (76.6) (33.7)
Benefit payments (332.3) (282.0)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ending balance $4,749.6 $5,178.9
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

For plans that are not fully funded:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 2000 1999
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Accumulated benefit obligation $2,487.1 $364.3
Plan assets 2,239.9 65.3
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

Certain international subsidiaries maintain unfunded plans consistent with local
practices and requirements. At December 31, 2000, these plans accounted for
$167.7 million of the Company's accumulated benefit obligation, $177.4 million
of its projected benefit obligation and $16.7 million of its minimum pension
liability adjustment ($170.6 million, $173.3 million and $13.4 million,
respectively, at December 31, 1999).


74
77
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

NOTE 16
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

INCOME TAXES

The components of Income from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes,
adjusted for Minority Interest in Net Income of Subsidiaries, follow:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 2000 1999 1998
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
U.S. $(142.3) $(69.5) $335.4
Foreign 201.1 369.6 595.0
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
58.8 300.1 930.4
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minority Interest in
Net Income of Subsidiaries 33.5 40.3 31.5
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 92.3 $340.4 $961.9
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

A reconciliation of Federal income taxes at the U.S. statutory rate to income
taxes provided follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in millions) 2000 1999 1998
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
U.S. Federal income tax at
the statutory rate of 35% $ 32.3 $119.2 $336.6
Adjustment for foreign income
taxed at different rates (26.0) (17.7) (54.3)
Gain on formation of Goodyear
Dunlop Tires Europe B.V -- (56.9) --
State income taxes, net of
Federal benefit (7.4) (12.7) 9.0
Foreign operating loss with no
tax benefit provided 24.8 24.0 --
Other (5.2) 1.0 (33.1)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
United States and Foreign
Taxes on Income $ 18.5 $ 56.9 $258.2
Effective tax rate 20.0% 16.7% 26.8%
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

The components of the provision for income taxes by taxing jurisdiction follow:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 2000 1999 1998
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current:
Federal $ 2.3 $ 40.7 $(27.2)
Foreign income and
withholding taxes 151.4 157.4 161.0
State 3.7 (0.2) 7.0
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 157.4 $ 197.9 $140.8
Deferred:
Federal (101.4) (128.5) 64.0
Foreign (22.6) 6.6 46.6
State (14.9) (19.1) 6.8
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(138.9) (141.0) 117.4
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
United States and Foreign
Taxes on Income $ 18.5 $ 56.9 $258.2
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

Temporary differences and carryforwards giving rise to deferred tax assets and
liabilities at December 31, 2000 and 1999 follow:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 2000 1999
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Postretirement benefits other than pensions $ 674.6 $ 695.7
Vacation and sick pay 71.0 74.0
Accrued expenses deductible as paid 102.7 106.3
Tax credit and operating loss carryforwards 208.4 185.5
Capitalized expenditures for tax reporting 199.9 123.0
Rationalizations and other provisions 37.2 48.9
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards 46.7 27.0
Other 59.7 34.6
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1,400.2 1,295.0
Valuation allowance (224.3) (163.9)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total deferred tax assets 1,175.9 1,131.1
Total deferred tax liabilities
-- property basis differences (499.3) (558.7)
-- inventory (92.3) (107.5)
-- pensions (157.8) (210.3)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total deferred taxes $ 426.5 $ 254.6
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

At December 31, 2000, the Company had tax credit carryforwards of $69.1 million
and $139.3 million of tax assets on foreign net operating loss carryforwards,
some of which are subject to expiration beginning in 2001. At December 31, 2000,
the Company had recorded valuation allowances totaling $224.3 million against
these and other deferred tax assets where recovery of the asset or carryforward
is uncertain.

The Company made net cash payments for income taxes in 2000, 1999 and 1998
of $152.7 million, $204.0 million and $230.7 million, respectively.

No provision for Federal income tax or foreign withholding tax on retained
earnings of international subsidiaries of $1.64 billion is required because this
amount has been or will be reinvested in properties and plants and working
capital.

It is not practicable to calculate the deferred taxes associated with the
remittance of these investments.


75
78
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

NOTE 17
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

INTEREST EXPENSE

Interest expense includes interest and amortization of debt discount and
expense, less amounts capitalized as follows:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 2000 1999 1998
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Interest expense before
capitalization $294.6 $191.2 $154.4
Capitalized interest (12.0) (11.8) (6.6)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$282.6 $179.4 $147.8
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

The Company made cash payments for interest in 2000, 1999 and 1998 of $261.0
million, $192.8 million and $143.8 million, respectively.

NOTE 18
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Research and development costs for 2000, 1999 and 1998 were $423.1 million,
$438.0 million and $420.7 million, respectively.

NOTE 19
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ADVERTISING COSTS

Advertising costs for 2000, 1999 and 1998 were $239.9 million, $238.2 million
and $233.4 million, respectively.

NOTE 20
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BUSINESS SEGMENTS

Segment information reflects the strategic business units of the Company (SBUs),
which are organized to meet customer requirements and global competition.

The Tire business is comprised of five regional SBUs. The Engineered and
Chemical businesses are each managed on a global basis. Segment information is
reported on the basis used for reporting to the Company's Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer.

Each of the five regional tire business segments is involved in the
development, manufacture, distribution and sale of tires. Certain of the tire
business segments also provide related products and services, which include
tubes, retreads, automotive repair services and merchandise purchased for
resale.

North American Tire provides original equipment and replacement tires for
autos, trucks, farm, aircraft and construction applications in the United
States, Canada and export markets. North American Tire also provides related
products and services including tread rubber, tubes, retreaded tires, automotive
repair services and merchandise purchased for resale.

European Union Tire provides original equipment and replacement tires for
autos, trucks, farm and construction applications in the European Union, Norway,
Switzerland and export markets. European Union Tire also retreads truck and
aircraft tires.

Eastern Europe, Africa and Middle East Tire provides replacement tires for
autos, trucks and farm applications in Eastern Europe, Africa, the Middle East
and export markets. The segment also provides original equipment tires to
manufacturers in Poland, South Africa, Turkey, Morocco and the Czech Republic.

Latin American Tire provides original equipment and replacement tires for
autos, trucks, tractors, aircraft and construction applications in Central and
South America, Mexico and export markets. Latin American Tire also manufactures
materials for tire retreading.

Asia Tire provides original equipment and replacement tires for autos,
trucks, farm, aircraft and construction applications in Asia and the Western
Pacific. Asia Tire also retreads truck, construction equipment and aircraft
tires and provides automotive repair services.

Engineered Products develops, manufactures and sells belts, hoses, molded
products, airsprings, tank tracks and other products for original equipment and
replacement transportation applications and industrial markets worldwide.

Chemical Products develops, manufactures and sells organic chemicals used
in rubber and plastic processing, synthetic rubber and rubber latices, and other
products for internal and external customers worldwide. Chemical Products also
engages in plantation and natural rubber purchasing operations.

The Company's oil transportation business was sold during 1998 and is
accounted for as a discontinued operation. Refer to Note 22.


76
79
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 2000 1999 1998
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
SALES
North American Tire $ 7,111.3 $ 6,648.6 $ 6,507.9
European Union Tire 3,198.1 2,642.7 2,139.8
Eastern Europe, Africa and Middle East Tire 793.0 812.9 867.4
Latin American Tire 1,047.9 948.1 1,269.8
Asia Tire 524.6 593.2 519.3
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Tires 12,674.9 11,645.5 11,304.2
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Engineered Products 1,174.2 1,234.8 1,301.8
Chemical Products 1,129.7 949.8 993.0
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Segment Sales 14,978.8 13,830.1 13,599.0
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inter-SBU sales (567.1) (482.8) (524.3)
Other 5.4 8.1 6.9
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Sales $14,417.1 $13,355.4 $13,081.6
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

INCOME
North American Tire $ 260.7 $ 26.3 $ 314.2
European Union Tire 88.7 188.0 199.7
Eastern Europe, Africa and Middle East Tire 54.6 49.8 102.4
Latin American Tire 69.8 67.7 186.1
Asia Tire 17.9 26.0 7.5
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Tires 491.7 357.8 809.9
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Engineered Products 43.1 70.4 111.7
Chemical Products 64.2 116.4 132.7
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Segment Income (EBIT) 599.0 544.6 1,054.3
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rationalizations, asset sales and other provisions (119.1) (4.9) 137.6
Interest expense (282.6) (179.4) (147.8)
Foreign currency exchange 6.7 27.6 2.6
Minority interest in net income of subsidiaries (33.5) (40.3) (31.5)
Inter-SBU income (28.8) (49.6) (61.1)
Other (82.9) 2.1 (23.7)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes $ 58.8 $ 300.1 $ 930.4
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ASSETS
North American Tire $ 5,268.5 $ 5,046.6 $ 4,136.7
European Union Tire 3,088.1 3,336.1 1,690.0
Eastern Europe, Africa and Middle East Tire 903.6 897.1 898.1
Latin American Tire 796.5 820.7 993.8
Asia Tire 668.5 725.5 744.0
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Tires 10,725.2 10,826.0 8,462.6
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Engineered Products 736.8 712.4 717.5
Chemical Products 742.9 689.6 625.1
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Segment Assets 12,204.9 12,228.0 9,805.2
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corporate 1,363.1 1,050.1 957.5
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assets $13,568.0 $13,278.1 $10,762.7
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>


Results of operations in the Tire and Engineered Products segments were measured
based on net sales to unaffiliated customers and EBIT. Results of operations of
the Chemical Products segment included transfers to other SBUs. EBIT is computed
as follows: net sales less cost of goods sold, selling, administrative and
general expense (including allocated central administrative expenses) and equity
in earnings of affiliated companies. Inter-SBU sales by Chemical Products were
at the lower of a formulated price or market. Purchases from Chemical Products
were included in the purchasing SBU's EBIT at Chemical Products cost. Segment
assets include those assets under the management of the SBU.



77
80
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 2000 1999 1998
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
North American Tire $ 235.4 $ 372.8 $ 325.7
European Union Tire 94.0 106.2 73.9
Eastern Europe, Africa and Middle East Tire 43.4 46.9 95.7
Latin American Tire 36.6 50.6 67.7
Asia Tire 35.3 38.0 55.2
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Tires 444.7 614.5 618.2
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Engineered Products 36.7 54.6 49.6
Chemical Products 76.7 90.4 95.2
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Segment Capital Expenditures 558.1 759.5 763.0
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corporate 56.4 45.5 75.4
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Capital Expenditures $ 614.5 $ 805.0 $ 838.4
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
North American Tire $ 270.0 $ 219.7 $ 216.7
European Union Tire 111.7 91.8 50.5
Eastern Europe, Africa and Middle East Tire 49.3 48.6 46.5
Latin American Tire 35.9 34.2 38.9
Asia Tire 38.2 40.5 29.1
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Tires 505.1 434.8 381.7
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Engineered Products 34.4 44.2 33.1
Chemical Products 39.4 35.8 34.4
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Segment Depreciation and Amortization 578.9 514.8 449.2
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corporate 51.4 66.9 56.7
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depreciation and Amortization $ 630.3 $ 581.7 $ 505.9
====================================================================================================================================
</TABLE>

Portions of the items described in Note 3, Rationalizations and Note 4, Other
(Income) and Expense were not charged (credited) to the SBUs for performance
evaluation purposes but were attributable to the SBUs as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 2000 1999 1998
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
RATIONALIZATIONS
North American Tire $ (.7) $ 71.5 $ (7.7)
European Union Tire 23.3 2.8 --
Eastern Europe, Africa and Middle East Tire 9.6 .3 --
Latin American Tire 65.7 77.3 --
Asia Tire 3.3 1.5 --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Tires 101.2 153.4 (7.7)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Engineered Products 3.8 8.8 --
Chemical Products -- 2.5 --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Segments 105.0 164.7 (7.7)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corporate 19.1 6.9 (22.0)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rationalizations $ 124.1 $ 171.6 $ (29.7)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

OTHER (INCOME) AND EXPENSE
North American Tire $ -- $ -- $ (44.1)
European Union Tire -- (149.7) (3.2)
Eastern Europe, Africa and Middle East Tire -- -- (.9)
Latin American Tire (5.0) -- 10.7
Asia Tire -- -- (10.1)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Tires (5.0) (149.7) (47.6)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Engineered Products -- -- 1.2
Chemical Products -- (17.0) (61.5)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Segments (5.0) (166.7) (107.9)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corporate 32.8 19.6 31.4
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other (Income) and Expense $ 27.8 $(147.1) $ (76.5)
====================================================================================================================================
</TABLE>


78
81


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


SPT operating loss in 2000 did not include rationalization charges totaling
$32.2 million.

Sales and operating income of the Asia Tire segment reflect the results of the
Company's majority-owned tire business in the region. In addition, the Company
owns a 50% interest in South Pacific Tyres Ltd. (SPT), a tire manufacturer in
Australia and New Zealand. Results of operations of SPT are not reported in
segment results, and are reflected in the Company's Consolidated Statement of
Income using the equity method.

The following table presents the sales and operating income of the
Company's Asia Tire segment together with 100% of the sales and operating income
of SPT:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 2000 1999 1998
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net Sales
Asia Tire Segment $ 524.6 $ 593.2 $ 519.3
SPT 563.6 674.5 654.0
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1,088.2 $1,267.7 $1,173.3
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating Income (Loss)
Asia Tire Segment $ 17.9 $ 26.0 $ 7.5
SPT (11.1) 31.2 47.2
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 6.8 $ 57.2 $ 54.7
======================================================================================
</TABLE>

The following table presents geographic information. Net sales by country were
determined based on the location of the selling subsidiary. Long-lived assets
consisted primarily of properties and plants, deferred charges and other
miscellaneous assets. Management did not consider the net sales or long-lived
assets of individual countries outside the United States to be significant to
the consolidated financial statements.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 2000 1999 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
NET SALES
United States $ 7,611.1 $ 7,136.6 $ 7,093.5
International 6,806.0 6,218.8 5,988.1
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$14,417.1 $13,355.4 $13,081.6
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LONG-LIVED ASSETS
United States $ 4,188.5 $ 4,080.1 $ 2,750.6
International 3,166.3 3,290.2 2,649.5
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 7,354.8 $ 7,370.3 $ 5,400.1
===================================================================================
</TABLE>


NOTE 21
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income follow:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions) 2000 1999
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Foreign currency translation adjustment $(1,273.9) $(1,072.2)
Minimum pension liability adjustment (21.9) (15.2)
Unrealized investment loss (10.0) (12.8)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$(1,305.8) $(1,100.2)
====================================================================================
</TABLE>


NOTE 22
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

On July 30, 1998, the Company sold substantially all of the assets and
liabilities of its oil transportation business to Plains All American Inc., a
subsidiary of Plains Resources Inc. Proceeds from the sale were $422.3 million,
which included distributions to the Company prior to closing of $25.1 million.
The principal asset of the oil transportation business was the All American
Pipeline System, consisting of a 1,225 mile heated crude oil pipeline system
extending from Las Flores and Gaviota, California, to McCamey, Texas, a crude
oil gathering system located in California's San Joaquin Valley and related
terminal and storage facilities.

The transaction has been accounted for as a sale of discontinued operations.
Operating results and the loss on sale of discontinued operations follow:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions, except per share) Year Ended December 31, 1998
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
Net Sales $ 22.4
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income before Income Taxes $ 12.9
United States Taxes on Income 4.7
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income from Discontinued Operations 8.2
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Loss on Sale of Discontinued Operations,
including income from operations during
the disposal period (3/21/98 - 7/30/98)
of $10.0 (net of tax of $24.1) (42.9)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discontinued Operations $ (34.7)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE -- BASIC:
Income from Discontinued Operations $ .05
Loss on Sale of Discontinued Operations (.27)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discontinued Operations $ (.22)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE -- DILUTED:
Income from Discontinued Operations $ .05
Loss on Sale of Discontinued Operations (.27)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discontinued Operations $ (.22)
===================================================================================
</TABLE>


79
82


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


NOTE 23
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

At December 31, 2000, the Company had binding commitments for investments in
land, buildings and equipment of $177.1 million and off-balance-sheet financial
guarantees written and other commitments totaling $138.8 million.

At December 31, 2000, the Company had recorded liabilities aggregating $78.3
million for anticipated costs related to various environmental matters,
primarily the remediation of numerous waste disposal sites and certain
properties sold by the Company. These costs include legal and consulting fees,
site studies, the design and implementation of remediation plans,
post-remediation monitoring and related activities and will be paid over several
years. The amount of the Company's ultimate liability in respect of these
matters may be affected by several uncertainties, primarily the ultimate cost of
required remediation and the extent to which other responsible parties
contribute. Refer to Environmental Cleanup Matters at Note 1.

At December 31, 2000, the Company had recorded liabilities aggregating $96.1
million for potential product liability and other tort claims, including related
legal fees expected to be incurred, presently asserted against the Company. The
amount recorded was determined on the basis of an assessment of potential
liability using an analysis of pending claims, historical experience and current
trends. The Company has concluded that in respect of any of the above described
liabilities, it is not reasonably possible that it would incur a loss exceeding
the amount already recognized with respect thereto which would be material
relative to the consolidated financial position, results of operations or
liquidity of the Company.

Various other legal actions, claims and governmental investigations and
proceedings covering a wide range of matters are pending against the Company and
its subsidiaries. Management, after reviewing available information relating to
such matters and consulting with the Company's General Counsel, has determined
with respect to each such matter either that it is not reasonably possible that
the Company has incurred liability in respect thereof or that any liability
ultimately incurred will not exceed the amount, if any, recorded at December 31,
2000 in respect thereof which would be material relative to the consolidated
financial position, results of operations or liquidity of the Company. However,
in the event of an unanticipated adverse final determination in respect of
certain matters, the Company's consolidated net income for the period in which
such determination occurs could be materially affected.


NOTE 24
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PREFERRED STOCK PURCHASE RIGHTS PLAN

In June 1996, the Company authorized 7,000,000 shares of Series B Preferred
Stock ("Series B Preferred") issuable only upon the exercise of rights
("Rights") issued under the Preferred Stock Purchase Rights Plan adopted on, and
set forth in the Rights Agreement dated, June 4, 1996. Each share of Series B
Preferred issued would be non-redeemable, non-voting and entitled to (i)
cumulative quarterly dividends equal to the greater of $25.00 or, subject to
adjustment, 100 times the per year amount of dividends declared on Goodyear
Common Stock ("the Common Stock") during the preceding quarter and (ii) a
liquidation preference.

Under the Rights Plan, each shareholder of record on July 29, 1996 received a
dividend of one Right per share of the Common Stock. Each Right, when
exercisable, will entitle the registered holder thereof to purchase from the
Company one one-hundredth of a share of Series B Preferred Stock at a price of
$250 (the "Purchase Price"), subject to adjustment. The Rights will expire on
July 29, 2006, unless earlier redeemed at $.001 per Right. The Rights will be
exercisable only in the event that an acquiring person or group purchases, or
makes -- or announces its intention to make -- a tender offer for, 15% or more
of the Common Stock. In the event that any acquiring person or group acquires
15% or more of the Common Stock, each Right will entitle the holder to purchase
that number of shares of Common Stock (or in certain circumstances, other
securities, cash or property) which at the time of such transaction would have a
market value of two times the Purchase Price.

If the Company is acquired or a sale or transfer of 50% or more of the
Company's assets or earnings power is made after the Rights become exercisable,
each Right (except those held by an acquiring person or group) will entitle the
holder to purchase common stock of the acquiring entity having a market value
then equal to two times the Purchase Price. In addition, when exercisable the
Rights under certain circumstances may be exchanged by the Company at the ratio
of one share of Common Stock (or the equivalent thereof in other securities,
property or cash) per Right, subject to adjustment.


80
83


SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (UNAUDITED)


QUARTERLY DATA AND MARKET PRICE INFORMATION

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions, except per share) Quarter
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 First Second Third Fourth Year
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net Sales $3,664.1 $3,607.3 $3,619.3 $ 3,526.4 $14,417.1
Gross Profit 730.1 756.7 650.5 642.5 2,779.8
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Income (Loss) $ 48.2 $ 77.1 $ 17.0 $ (102.0) $ 40.3
Net Income (Loss) Per Share -- Basic $ .31 $ .49 $ .11 $ (.65) $ .26
-- Diluted .30 .49 .11 (.65) .25
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Shares Outstanding -- Basic 156.3 156.4 157.0 157.6 156.8
-- Diluted 158.7 158.7 158.2 157.6 158.8
Price Range of Common Stock:*
High $ 29 1/8 $ 31 5/8 $ 26 3/4 $ 24.09 $ 31 5/8
Low 20 3/8 19 3/4 17 1/4 15.60 15.60
Dividends Per Share $ .30 $ .30 $ .30 $ .30 $ 1.20
================================================================================================================================
</TABLE>

The second quarter included a net after-tax charge of $5.2 million or $.03 per
share for rationalizations. The third quarter included an after-tax gain of $3.2
million or $.02 per share from asset sales and an after-tax charge of $1.2
million or $.01 per share for rationalizations. The fourth quarter included an
after-tax charge of $93.7 million or $.59 per share for rationalizations.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In millions, except per share) Quarter
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1999 First Second Third Fourth Year
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net Sales $3,099.1 $3,162.8 $ 3,416.4 $ 3,677.1 $13,355.4
Gross Profit 655.4 639.1 505.7 722.9 2,523.1
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Income $ 23.9 $ 83.1 $ 99.2 $ 37.0 $ 243.2
Net Income Per Share -- Basic $ .15 $ .54 $ .63 $ .23 $ 1.55
-- Diluted .15 .52 .63 .23 1.53
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Shares Outstanding -- Basic 156.0 156.1 156.3 156.3 156.2
-- Diluted 157.8 159.6 159.5 158.8 158.9
Price Range of Common Stock:*
High $ 54 7/8 $ 66 3/4 $59 13/16 $ 51 5/8 $ 66 3/4
Low 45 7/16 50 44 25 1/2 25 1/2
Dividends Per Share $ .30 $ .30 $ .30 $ .30 $ 1.20
================================================================================================================================
</TABLE>

The first quarter included an after-tax charge of $116.0 million or $.74 per
share for rationalizations. The second quarter included an after-tax credit of
$6.0 million or $.04 per share from the reversal of rationalization reserves
that were no longer needed. The third quarter included an after-tax charge of
$42.4 million or $.27 per share for rationalizations and after-tax credits
totaling $181.5 million or $1.14 per share from asset sales and the reversal of
rationalization reserves that were no longer needed. The fourth quarter included
an after-tax charge of $19.3 million or $.12 per share and an after-tax credit
of $12.5 million or $.08 per share from the reversal of rationalization
reserves.

Per share amounts of unusual items are diluted.

During the fourth quarter of 2000, the Company 1) changed its inventory costing
method from LIFO to FIFO and 2) began reporting expenses for transportation of
products to customers as Cost of Goods Sold. Prior periods have been restated.
Refer to Notes 1 and 7.

The change in the reporting of transportation costs increased Net Sales by
$127.6 million, $132.6 million and $136.9 million in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd
quarters of 2000, respectively, and increased Net Sales by $107.9 million,
$114.1 million, $127.6 million and $125.2 million in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th
quarters of 1999, respectively.

The change in the inventory costing method and the reclassification of equity
earnings of affiliates increased (decreased) Gross Profit by $(17.8) million,
$23.2 million and $33.4 million in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd quarters of 2000,
respectively, and increased (decreased) Gross Profit by $(4.4) million, $25.6
million, $(18.5) million and $(8.8) million in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th
quarters of 1999, respectively. As a result, Net Income (Loss) increased
(decreased) by $(15.4) million, $17.4 million and $23.6 million in the 1st, 2nd
and 3rd quarters of 2000 and $(1.6) million, $17.4 million, $(9.9) million and
$(3.8) million in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th quarters of 1999, respectively.

For additional information, refer to Exhibit 99.10 to this annual Report on
Form 10-K, which is incorporated herein by reference.

*New York Stock Exchange -- Composite Transactions


81
84


ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.None.


PART III.

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.

Information required by Item 401 of Regulation S-K in respect of directors
of Registrant is, pursuant to General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K,
incorporated herein by specific reference to the text set forth under the
caption "Election of Directors" at pages 3 through 6, inclusive, of Registrant's
Proxy Statement, dated February 26, 2001, for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders
to be held on April 2, 2001 (the "Proxy Statement"). For information regarding
the executive officers of Registrant, reference is made to Part I, Item 4(A), at
pages 27 through 31, inclusive, of this Annual Report.


SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Based solely on a review of copies of reports on Forms 3 and 4 received by
Registrant and on written representations from certain directors and officers
that no updating Section 16(a) forms were required to be filed by them,
Registrant believes that no director or officer of Registrant filed a late
report or failed to file a required report under Section 16(a) of the Exchange
Act during or in respect of the year ended December 31, 2000. To the knowledge
of Registrant, during 2000 there was no person required to file reports under
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act as the owner of 10% or more of the Common
Stock or any other class of Registrant's equity securities and, accordingly, the
Company is not aware of any such owner's failure to file a required report on a
timely basis during 2000.


ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

Information required by Item 402 of Regulation S-K in respect of
management of Registrant is, pursuant to General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K,
incorporated herein by specific reference to the text set forth in the Proxy
Statement under the caption "Executive Officer Compensation", at pages 10
through 19, inclusive, of the Proxy Statement.


ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.

Information required by Item 403 of Regulation S-K relating to the
ownership of Registrant's Common Stock by certain beneficial owners and
management is, pursuant to General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, incorporated
herein by specific reference to the text set forth in the Proxy Statement under
the caption "Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock" at pages 8, 9 and 10 of the
Proxy Statement.


ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.

Information required by Item 404 of Regulation S-K relating to certain
transactions by and relationships of management is, pursuant to General
Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, incorporated herein by specific reference to the
text set forth in the Proxy Statement under the caption "Executive Officer
Compensation" at pages 10 through 19, inclusive, of the Proxy Statement.


82
85
PART IV.


ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.


A. LIST OF DOCUMENTS FILED AS PART OF THIS REPORT:

1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: See Index on page 53 of this Annual Report.


2. FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES: See Index To Financial Statement
Schedules attached to this Annual Report at page FS-1. The Financial
Statement Schedule at page FS-1 is by specific reference hereby
incorporated into and made a part of this Annual Report.


3. EXHIBITS REQUIRED TO BE FILED BY ITEM 601 OF REGULATION S-K: See the
Index of Exhibits at pages X-1 through X-10, inclusive, which is by
specific reference hereby incorporated into and made a part of this
Annual Report. The following exhibits, each listed in the Index of
Exhibits, are or relate to compensation plans and arrangements of
Registrant:



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION FILED AS EXHIBIT
- ------- ----------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C>

10(a) 1997 Performance Incentive Plan of The 10.1 to Form 10-Q for
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company the quarter ended
(the "1997 Plan") June 30, 1997

10(b) 1989 Goodyear Performance and Equity A to Form 10-Q for
Incentive Plan ("1989 Plan") quarter ended March 31, 1989

10(c) Forms of Stock Option Grant Agreements 10.1 to Form 10-K for
under the 1997 Plan in respect of Stock year ended December 31,
Options and SARs granted December 2, 1997
1997

10(d) Performance Recognition Plan 10.1 to this Annual Report
adopted as of January 1, 2001 on Form 10-K

10(e) Form of Performance Unit Grant Agreement 10.2 to Form 10-K for
under 1997 Plan dated December 2, 1997 year ended December 31,
1997

10(f) Forms of Stock Option Unit Grant Agreements 10.3 to Form 10-K for year
under 1989 Plan in respect of options and ended December 31, 1996
SARs granted December 3, 1996

10(g) Form of Stock Option Grant Agreement G to Form 10-K for year
under 1989 Plan in respect of options ended December 31, 1993
granted January 4, 1994

10(h) Forms of Stock Option Grant 10.1 to Form 10-K for
Agreements and Performance Grant year ended December
Agreements under 1997 Plan in respect 31, 1998
of Options and SARs and Performance
Unit Grants made on November 30, 1998
and on other dates

10(i) Form of Performance Equity Grant 10.2 to Form 10-K for year
Agreement for 1994 under 1989 Plan ended December 31, 1996
(as amended December 3, 1996)

10(j) Goodyear Supplementary Pension Plan A to Form 10-Q for quarter
(as amended) ended March 31, 1990

</TABLE>

83
86

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION FILED AS EXHIBIT
- ------- ----------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C>
10(k) Form of Performance Equity Grant 10.4 to Form 10-K for year
Agreement for 1995 under 1989 Plan ended December 31, 1996
(as amended December 3, 1996)

10(l) Goodyear Employee Severance Plan A-II to Form 10-K for year
ended December 31, 1988

10(m) Forms of Stock Option Grant Agreements 10.3 to Form 10-K for year
under 1989 Plan in respect of options and ended December 31, 1995
SARs granted January 9, 1996

10(n) Form of Performance Equity Grant 10.5 to Form 10-K for year
Agreement for 1996 under 1989 Plan ended December 31, 1996
(as amended December 3, 1996)

10(o) Form of Performance Equity Grant 10.6 to Form 10-K for year
Agreement for 1997 under 1989 Plan ended December 31, 1996

10(p) Forms of Stock Option Grant Agreements G to Form 10-K for year
under 1989 Plan in respect of options and ended December 31, 1994
SARs granted January 4, 1995

10(r) Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives B to Form 10-Q for quarter
ended September 30, 1994

10(s) 1994 Restricted Stock Award Plan for B to Form 10-Q for
Non-employee Directors quarter ended June 30, 1994

10(t) Outside Directors' Equity 10.3 to Form 10-K for year
Participation Plan (as amended) ended December 31, 1997

10(u) Amended Annex A to Performance Equity 10.2 to Form 10-K for year
Grant for 1997 and to Performance Grant ended December 31, 1998
for 1998

10(y) Performance Recognition Plan of 10.1 to Form 10-K
Registrant, as adopted effective for year ended
January 1, 2000 December 31, 1999

10(z) Forms of Stock Option Grant Agreements 10.2 to for year ended
under 1997 Plan in respect of options December 31, 1999
and SARs granted December 6, 1999

10(aa) Forms of Stock Option Grant Agreements 10.2 to this Annual Report
under 1997 Plan in respect of options and on Form 10-K
SARS granted December 4, 2000

10(bb) Forms of Performance Equity Plan Unit 10.3 to this Annual Report
Grant Agreements for 2001 on Form 10-K

10(cc) Conformed copy of letter agreement dated 10.1 to Form 10-Q
September 11, 2000, between Registrant for quarter ended
and Robert J. Keegan September 30, 2000

10(dd) Conformed copy of Restricted Stock 10.1 to Form 10-Q
Purchase Agreement, dated October for quarter ended
3, 2000, between Registrant and September 30, 2000
Robert J. Keegan

10(ee) Conformed copy of Stock Option Grant 10.1 to Form 10-Q
Agreement, dated October 3, 2000 for quarter ended
between Registrant and Robert J. September 30, 2000
Keegan
</TABLE>

B. REPORTS ON FORM 8-K:


No Current Report on Form 8-K was filed by Registrant with the Securities
and Exchange Commission during the quarter ended December 31, 2000.


84
87



SIGNATURES


PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, THE REGISTRANT HAS DULY CAUSED THIS ANNUAL REPORT TO BE
SIGNED ON ITS BEHALF BY THE UNDERSIGNED, THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED.


THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY
(Registrant)


Date: March 1, 2001 By /s/ SAMIR G. GIBARA
---------------------------------------
Samir G. Gibara, Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer


PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, THIS
ANNUAL REPORT HAS BEEN SIGNED BELOW BY THE FOLLOWING PERSONS ON BEHALF OF THE
REGISTRANT AND IN THE CAPACITIES AND ON THE DATES INDICATED.

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Date: March 1, 2001 /s/ SAMIR G. GIBARA
---------------------------------------------------
Samir G. Gibara, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive
Officer)


Date: March 1, 2001 /s/ ROBERT W. TIEKEN
---------------------------------------------------
Robert W. Tieken, Executive Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer)


Date: March 1, 2001 /s/ RICHARD J. KRAMER
---------------------------------------------------
Richard J. Kramer, Vice President - Corporate Finance
(Principal Accounting Officer)
</TABLE>



<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
JOHN G. BREEN, Director
WILLIAM E. BUTLER, Director
THOMAS H. CRUIKSHANK, Director
KATHERINE G. FARLEY, Director
EDWARD T. FOGARTY, Director
Date: March 1, 2001 WILLIAM J. HUDSON, JR., Director By /s/ ROBERT W. TIEKEN
ROBERT J. KEEGAN, Director ------------------------------------
STEVEN A. MINTER, Director Robert W. Tieken, Signing as
AGNAR PYTTE, Director Attorney-in-Fact for the directors
GEORGE H. SCHOFIELD, Director whose names appear opposite.
WILLIAM C. TURNER, Director
MARTIN D. WALKER, Director
</TABLE>

A Power of Attorney, dated December 5, 2000, authorizing Robert W. Tieken
to sign this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2000 on behalf of certain of the directors of the Registrant is filed as Exhibit
24 to this Annual Report.


85
88



FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES ITEMS 8 AND 14(A)(2) OF FORM 10-K
FOR CORPORATIONS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000

--------------------

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES


FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

SCHEDULE NO. PAGE NUMBER
------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts. . . . . . . . . . . . . II FS-1
</TABLE>

All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the
required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.


Financial statements and schedules relating to 50 percent or less owned
companies, the investments in which are accounted for by the equity method, have
been omitted as permitted because, considered in the aggregate as a single
subsidiary, these companies would not constitute a significant subsidiary.


================================================================================
SCHEDULE II -- VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
================================================================================

(IN MILLIONS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ADDITIONS
--------------------
TRANSLATION
BALANCE AT CHARGED ACQUIRED DEDUCTIONS ADJUSTMENT BALANCE
BEGINNING (CREDITED) BY FROM DURING AT END OF
DESCRIPTION OF PERIOD TO INCOME PURCHASE RESERVES PERIOD PERIOD
---------- --------- -------- ---------- ----------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Deducted from accounts and notes receivable:
For doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 81.9 $42.7 $1.4 $(29.1) (a) $(3.6) $ 93.3
Valuation allowance -- deferred
tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163.9 60.4 -- -- -- 224.3

- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1999
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Deducted from accounts and notes receivable:
For doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 54.9 $ 29.2 $19.3 $(19.5) (a) $(2.0) $ 81.9
Valuation allowance -- deferred
tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41.7 108.4 13.8 -- -- 163.9

- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1998
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Deducted from accounts and notes receivable:
For doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . $ 49.5 $ 23.4 $ -- $(18.0) (a) $ -- $ 54.9
Valuation allowance -- deferred
tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15.8 25.9 -- -- -- 41.7
</TABLE>

- -----------

Note: (a) Accounts and notes receivable charged off.



FS-1
89
THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
INDEX OF EXHIBITS(1)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
TABLE
ITEM EXHIBIT
NO. (2) DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT NUMBER
- ------- ---------------------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
3 ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND BY-LAWS

(a) Certificate of Amended Articles of Incorporation of The
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, dated December 20, 1954,
and Certificate of Amendment to Amended Articles of
Incorporation of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, dated
April 6, 1993, and Certificate of Amendment to Amended
Articles of Incorporation of Registrant dated June 4, 1996,
three documents comprising Registrant's Articles of
Incorporation as amended through March 25, 1999
(incorporated by reference, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 1996, File No. 1-1927).

(b) Code of Regulations of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company,
adopted November 22, 1955, and amended April 5, 1965, April
7, 1980, April 6, 1981 and April 13, 1987 (incorporated by
reference, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission as Exhibit 4.1(B) to Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-3, File No. 333-1955).


4 INSTRUMENTS DEFINING THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS,
INCLUDING INDENTURES

(a) Specimen nondenominational Certificate for shares of the
Common Stock, Without Par Value, of the Registrant; one
certificate, First Chicago Trust Company of New York as
transfer agent and registrar (incorporated by reference,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as
Exhibit 4.3 to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10- Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1996, File No. 1-
1927).

(b) Conformed copy of Rights Agreement, dated as of June 4,
1996, between Registrant and First Chicago Trust Company of
New York, Rights Agent (incorporated by reference, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission as Exhibit 1 to
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated June
11, 1996 and as Exhibit 4(a) to Registrant's Current Report
on Form 8-K dated June 4, 1996, File No. 1-1927).

</TABLE>

- ------------

(1) See Part IV, Item 14, Part A.3.


(2) Pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.




X-1
90
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
TABLE
ITEM EXHIBIT
NO. (2) DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT NUMBER
- ------- ---------------------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
4 (c) Conformed copy of Amendment to Rights Agreement,
dated as of February 8, 2000 between Registrant and First
Chicago Trust Company of New York, Rights Agent (incor-
porated by reference, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant's annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999).

(d) Conformed Copy of Revolving Credit Facility Agreement,
dated as of July 15, 1994, among Registrant, the Lenders
named therein and Chemical Bank, as Agent (incorporated
by reference, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission as Exhibit A to Registrant's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1994, File
No. 1-1927).

(e) Conformed Copy of Replacement and Restatement Agreement,
dated as of July 15, 1996, among Registrant, the Lenders
named therein and The Chase Manhattan Bank (formerly
Chemical Bank), as Agent, relating to the Revolving Credit
Facility Agreement dated as of July 15, 1994 among
Registrant, the Lenders named therein and Chemical Bank
(incorporated by reference, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as Exhibit 4.5 to Registrant's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 1996, File No. 1-1927).

(f) Conformed copy of First Amendment to Replacement and
Restatement Agreement, dated as of March 31, 1997, among
Registrant, the Lenders named therein and The Chase
Manhattan Bank (formerly Chemical Bank), as Agent
(incorporated by reference, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as Exhibit 4.5 to Registrant's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 1997, File No. 1-1927).

(g) Conformed copy of Second Replacement and Restatement
Agreement dated as of July 13, 1998, among Registrant, the
Lenders named therein and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as
Agent (incorporated by reference, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission as Exhibit 4 to Registrant's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 1998, File No. 1-1927).

(h) Conformed copy of Indenture, dated as of March 15, 1996,
between Registrant and Chemical Bank (now The Chase
Manhattan Bank), as Trustee, as supplemented on December 3,
1996, March 11, 1998, and March 17, 1998 (incorporated by
reference, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant's Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998, File No.
1-1927).
</TABLE>

- ------------

(2) Pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.





X-2
91


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
TABLE
ITEM EXHIBIT
NO. (2) DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT NUMBER
- ------- ---------------------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
4 (i) Conformed copy of Indenture, dated as of March 1, 1999,
between Registrant and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as
Trustee (incorporated by reference, filed as Exhibit 4.2,
with Amendment No. 1, to Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-3, File No. 333-67145).

(j) Conformed copy of Credit Agreement [364-Day Facility],
dated as of August 20, 1999, among Registrant, the Lenders
named therein and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Agent
(incorporated by reference, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quar-
ter ended September 30, 1999, File No. 1-1927).

(k) Conformed copy of Five-Year Revolving Credit Agreement,
dated as of August 15, 2000, among Registrant, the Lenders
named therein and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Agent
(incorporated by reference, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quar-
ter ended September 30, 2000, File No. 1-1927),

(l) Conformed copy of 364-Day Revolving Credit Agreement, dated
as of August 15, 2000, among Registrant, the Lenders named
therein and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Agent
(incorporated by reference, filed as Exhibit 4.2 to
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quar-
ter ended September 30, 2000, File No. 1-1927),

(m) Conformed copy of Amendment, dated as of January 26, 4.1
2001, to Five-Year Revolving Credit Agreement, among
Registrant, the Lenders named therein and The Chase
Manhattan Bank as Agent.

(n) Conformed copy of amendment, dated as of January 26, 4.2
2001, to 364-Day Revolving Credit Agreement, among
Registrant, the Lenders named therein and the Chase
Manhattan Bank, as Agent

Information concerning Goodyear's long-term debt is set
forth at Note 11, captioned "Financing Arrangements and
Derivative Financial Instruments", at the sub-caption "Long
Term Debt and Financing Arrangements", in the Financial
Statements set forth at Item 8 of this Annual Report and is
incorporated herein by specific reference. In accordance
with paragraph (iii) to Part 4 of Item 601 of Regulation
S-K, agreements and instruments defining the rights of
holders of long term debt of Registrant pursuant to which
the amount of securities authorized thereunder does not
exceed 10% of the consolidated assets of Registrant and its
subsidiaries are not filed herewith. The Registrant hereby
agrees to furnish a copy of any such agreement or
instrument to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon
request.
</TABLE>

- ------------

(2) Pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.



X-3
92

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
TABLE
ITEM EXHIBIT
NO. (2) DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT NUMBER
- ------- ---------------------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
10 MATERIAL CONTRACTS

(a) 1997 Performance Incentive Plan of The Goodyear Tire &
Rubber Company, as adopted by the Board of Directors on
February 4, 1997, and approved by shareholders on April 14,
1997 (incorporated by reference, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 1997, File No. 1-1927).
(b) 1989 Goodyear Performance and Equity Incentive Plan of
Registrant, as adopted by the Board of Directors of
Registrant on December 6, 1988, and approved by the
shareholders of Registrant on April 10, 1989 (incorporated
by reference, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission as Exhibit A to Registrant's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1989, File No.
1-1927).
(c) Forms of Stock Option Grant Agreements in respect of
options granted December 2, 1997 under the 1997 Performance
Incentive Plan of Registrant: Part I, form of Grant
Agreement for Incentive Stock Options; Part II, form of
Grant Agreement for Non-Qualified Stock Options; and Part
III, form of Grant Agreement for Non-Qualified Stock
Options and tandem Stock Appreciation Rights (incorporated
by reference, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, File No.
1-1927).
(d) Performance Recognition Plan of Registrant adopted effec- 10.1
tive January 1, 2001.
(e) Form of Performance Unit Grant Agreement in respect of
grants made on December 2, 1997 in respect of 1998 under
the 1997 Performance Incentive Plan of Registrant (incor-
porated by reference, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997,
File No. 1-1927).
(f) Forms of Stock Option Grant Agreements in respect of
options and SARs granted December 3, 1996 under the 1989
Goodyear Performance and Equity Incentive Plan: Part I,
form of Agreement for Incentive Stock Options; Part II,
form of Agreement for Non-Qualified Stock Options; and Part
III, form of Agreement for Non-Qualified Stock Options and
Tandem Stock Appreciation Rights (incorporated by
reference, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission as Exhibit 10.3 to Registrant's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996, File No.
1-1927).
</TABLE>

- -------------

(2) Pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.



X-4
93

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
TABLE
ITEM EXHIBIT
NO. (2) DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT NUMBER
- ------- ---------------------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
10 (g) Form of Stock Option Grant Agreement under the 1989
Goodyear Performance and Equity Incentive Plan in respect
of options granted January 4, 1994 (incorporated by
reference, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission as Exhibit G to Registrant's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993, File No.
1-1927).

(h) Forms of Grant Agreements in respect of stock options, SARs
and performance units granted during 1998 under
Registrant's 1997 Performance Incentive Plan: Part I, form
of Grant Agreement for Non-Qualified Stock Options; Part
II, form of Grant Agreement for Non-Qualified Stock Options
and tandem Stock Appreciation Rights; Part III, form of
Grant Agreement for Performance Units; and Part IV, form of
Grant Agreement for Chairman's Award Performance Units
(incorporated by reference, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998,
File No. 1-1927).

(i) Form of Performance Equity Grant Agreement in respect of
grants made on January 4, 1994 under the 1989 Goodyear
Performance and Equity Incentive Plan, as amended December
3, 1996 (incorporated by reference, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission as Exhibit 10.2 to
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1996, File No. 1-1927).

(j) Goodyear Supplementary Pension Plan, as amended May 1, 1990
(incorporated by reference, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as Exhibit A to Registrant's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1990,
File No. 1-1927).

(k) Form of Performance Equity Grant Agreement in respect of
grants made on December 6, 1994 in respect of 1995 under
the 1989 Goodyear Performance and Equity Incentive Plan, as
amended December 3, 1996 (incorporated by reference,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as
Exhibit 10.4 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1996, File No. 1-1927).

(l) Goodyear Employee Severance Plan, as adopted by the Board
of Directors of Registrant on February 14, 1989
(incorporated by reference, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as Exhibit A-II to Registrant's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1988,
File No. 1-1927).

</TABLE>

- -----------

(2) Pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.



X-5
94

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
TABLE
ITEM EXHIBIT
NO. (2) DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT NUMBER
- ------- ---------------------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
10 (m) Forms of Stock Option Grant Agreements granted January
9, 1996 under the 1989 Goodyear Performance and Equity
Incentive Plan: Part I, Form of Agreement for Incentive
Stock Options; Part II, Form of Agreement for Non-
Qualified Stock Options; and Part III, Form of Agreement
for Non-Qualified Stock Options and tandem Stock
Appreciation Rights (incorporated by reference, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission as Exhibit 10.3 to
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1995, File No. 1-1927).
(n) Form of Performance Equity Grant Agreement in respect of
grants made January 9, 1996 under the 1989 Goodyear
Performance and Equity Incentive Plan, as amended December
3, 1996 (incorporated by reference, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission as Exhibit 10.5 to
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1996, File No. 1-1927).
(o) Form of Performance Equity Grant Agreement in respect of
grants made on December 3, 1996 in respect of 1997 under
the 1989 Goodyear Performance and Equity Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as Exhibit 10.6 to Registrant's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996,
File No. 1-1927).
(p) Forms of Stock Option Grant Agreements in respect of
options and SARs granted January 4, 1995 under the 1989
Goodyear Performance and Equity Incentive Plan: Part I,
form of Agreement for Incentive Stock Options; Part II,
form of Agreement for Non-Qualified Stock Options; and Part
III, form of Agreement for Non-Qualified Stock Options and
tandem Stock Appreciation Rights (incorporated by
reference, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission as Exhibit G to Registrant's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, File No.
1-1927).
(q) Conformed copy of Consolidated Receivables Sale Agreement
[$550,000,000 Facility], dated as of November 15, 1996,
among Registrant, Asset Securitization Cooperative
Corporation and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
(incorporated by reference, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as Exhibit 10.7 to Registrant's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996,
File No. 1-1927).

(r) The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company Deferred Compensation
Plan for Executives, as adopted effective October 4, 1994
(incorporated by reference, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as Exhibit B to Registrant's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
1994, File No. 1-1927).
</TABLE>

- ------------

(2) Pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.



X-6
95
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

EXHIBIT
TABLE
ITEM EXHIBIT
NO. (2) DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT NUMBER
- ------- ---------------------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
(s) 1994 Restricted Stock Award Plan for Non-employee Directors
of Registrant, as adopted effective June 1, 1994
(incorporated by reference, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as Exhibit B to Registrant's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1994,
File No. 1-1927).
(t) Outside Directors' Equity Participation Plan, as adopted
February 2, 1996 and amended February 3, 1998 (incor-
porated by reference filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission as Exhibit 10.3 to Registrant's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, File No.
1-1927).
(u) Amendments to Annexes to Performance Grant Agreements:
Part I, Amendment to Annex A to Performance Equity Grant
Agreement for 1997; and Part II, Amendment to Annex A to
Performance Grant Agreement for 1998 (incorporated by
reference, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission as Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, File No.
1-1927).
(v) Conformed copy of Umbrella Agreement, dated as of June 14,
1999, between Registrant and Sumitomo Rubber Industries,
Ltd. (incorporated by reference, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 1999, File No. 1-1927).
(w) Conformed copy of Joint Venture Agreement for Europe,
dated as of June 14, 1999 (and amendment No. 1 dated as
of September 1, 1999), among Registrant, Goodyear S.A.,
a French corporation, Goodyear S.A., a Luxembourg cor-
poration, Goodyear Canada Inc., Sumitomo Rubber
Industries, Ltd., and Sumitomo Rubber Europe B.V. (incor-
porated by reference, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 1999, File No. 1-1927).
(x) Conformed copy of Shareholders Agreement for the Europe
JVC, dated as of June 14, 1999, among Registrant,
Goodyear S.A., a French corporation, Goodyear S.A., a
Luxembourg corporation, Goodyear Canada Inc., and
Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd. (incorporated by refer-
ence, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
as Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999, File No.
1-1927).
(y) Performance Recognition Plan of Registrant, as adopted
effective January 1, 2000 (incorporated by reference, filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1999, File No. 1-1927).
</TABLE>

- ------------

(2) Pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.



X-7
96

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
TABLE
ITEM EXHIBIT
NO. (2) DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT NUMBER
- ------- ---------------------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
10 (z) Forms of Stock Option Grant Agreements in respect of
options granted December 6, 1999 under the 1997
Performance Incentive Plan of Registrant: Part I, form of
Grant Agreement for Incentive Stock Options; Part II, form
of Grant Agreement for Non-Qualified Stock Options and
tandem stock appreciation rights; and Part III, form of
Grant Agreement for Non-Qualified Stock Options
(incorporated by reference, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1999, File No. 1-1927).

(aa) Forms of Stock Option Grant Agreements in respect of 10.2
options granted December 4, 2000, under the 1997
Performance Incentive Plan of Registrant: Part I, form of
Grant Agreement for Incentive Stock Options; Part II form
of Grant Agreement for Non-Qualified Stock Option; and
Part III, form of Grant Agreements for Non-Qualified
Stock Options and tandem stock appreciation rights.

(bb) Forms of Performance Equity Plan Unit Grant Agreements 10.3
in respect of grants made on December 5, 2000 under the
1997 Performance Incentive Plan of Registrant: Part I,
One year grant; Part II, Two year grant; part III, Three
year grant.

(cc) Conformed copy of letter agreement dated September 11,
2000, between Registrant and Robert J. Keegan (incorpo-
rated by reference, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2000, File No. 1-1927).

(dd) Conformed copy of Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement,
dated October 3, 2000, between Registrant and Robert J.
Keegan (incorporated by reference, filed as Exhibit 10.2
to Registrant's Quarterly Report on form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2000, File No. 1-1927).

(ee) Conformed copy of the Stock Option Grant Agreement, dated
October 3, 2000, between Registrant and Robert J. Keegan
(incorporated by reference, filed as Exhibit 10.3 to
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quar-
ter ended September 30, 2000, File No. 1-1927).

12 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF RATIOS

(a) Statement setting forth the Computation of Ratio of 12
Earnings to Fixed Charges.

18 LETTER RE CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
(a) Letter of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP dated February 18
5, 2001 regarding Registrant's adoption of FIFO for
domestic inventories.

21 SUBSIDIARIES
(a) List of subsidiaries of Registrant at December 31, 2000. 21

</TABLE>



X-8
97

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
TABLE
ITEM EXHIBIT
NO. (2) DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT NUMBER
- ------- ---------------------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
23 CONSENTS OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL
(a) Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent 23
accountants, to incorporation by reference of their report
set forth on page 53 of this Annual Report in certain
Registration Statements on Forms S-3 and S-8.

24 POWER OF ATTORNEY
(a) Power of Attorney, dated December 5, 2000, authorizing 24
Robert W. Tieken, C. Thomas Harvie, Stephanie W.
Bergeron and Richard J. Kramer, and each of them, to
sign this Annual Report on behalf of certain directors of
Registrant.

99 ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS
(a) Registrant's definitive Proxy Statement dated February
26, 2001 (portions incorporated by reference, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, File No. 1-1927).

(b) Registrant's Restated Consolidated Statement of Income 99.1
and Retained Earnings (unaudited) for the three months
ended March 31, 1999, six months ended June 30, 1999,
nine months ended September 30, 1999 and year ended
December 31, 1999.

(c) Registrant's Restated Consolidated Statement of Income 99.2
and Retained Earnings (unaudited) for the three months
ended March 31, 2000, the six months ended June 2000
and the nine months ended September 30, 2000.

(d) Registrant's Restated Consolidated Statement of Income 99.3
(unaudited) for the three months ended March 31, 1999,
June 30, 1999, September 30, 1999 and December 31,
1999.

(e) Registrant's Restated Consolidated Statement of Income 99.4
(unaudited) for the three months ended March 31, 2000,
June 30, 2000 and September 30, 2000.

(f) Registrant's Restated Consolidated Statement of Income 99.5
and Retained Earnings (unaudited) for the years ended
December 31, 1999, 1998, 1997 and 1996.

(g) Registrant's Restated Segment Information (unaudited) for 99.6
the three months ended March 31, 1999, June 30, 1999,
September 30, 1999 and December 31, 1999.

(h) Registrant's Restated Segment Information (unaudited) for 99.7
the three months ended March 31, 1999, the six months ended
June 30, 1999, the nine months ended September 30, 1999 and
the year ended December 31, 1999.
</TABLE>


X-9
98

DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit Table
Item No. (2) Exhibit Number
- ------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>

(i) Registrant's Restated Segment Information (unaudited) for 99.8
the three months ended March 31, 2000, June 30, 2000 and
September 30, 2000.

(j) Registrant's Restated Segment Information (unaudited) for 99.9
the three months ended March 31, 2000, the six months ended
June 30, 2000 and the nine months ended September 30, 2000.

(k) Reconciliation of Registrant's Consolidated Statements of 99.10
Income for each quarter in the two year period ended
December 31, 2000 to reflect changes in the methods of
costing certain domestic inventories and the reporting of
expenses for transportation of products to customers and the
reclassification of equity in earnings of affiliates.
</TABLE>


X-10