Companies:
10,796
total market cap:
HK$1111.584 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ HKD
$
USD
๐บ๐ธ
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
Selective Insurance
SIGI
#3204
Rank
HK$38.07 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
HK$633.67
Share price
-1.03%
Change (1 day)
-6.23%
Change (1 year)
๐ฆ Insurance
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Stock Splits
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Annual Reports (10-K)
Selective Insurance
Quarterly Reports (10-Q)
Financial Year FY2014 Q2
Selective Insurance - 10-Q quarterly report FY2014 Q2
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended:
June 30, 2014
or
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from_____________________________to_____________________________
Commission File Number: 001-33067
SELECTIVE INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
New Jersey
22-2168890
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
40 Wantage Avenue
Branchville, New Jersey
07890
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(Zip Code)
(973) 948-3000
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
x
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
x
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
x
Accelerated filer
o
Non-accelerated filer
o
Smaller reporting company
o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
x
As of
June 30, 2014
, there were
56,373,933
shares of common stock, par value $2.00 per share, outstanding.
Table of Contents
SELECTIVE INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
Table of Contents
Page No.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2014 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2013
1
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income for the Quarter and Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013
2
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Quarter and Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013
3
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013
4
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013
5
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
6
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
27
Introduction
27
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
28
Financial Highlights of Results for Second Quarter and Six Months 2014 and Second Quarter and Six Months 2013
28
Results of Operations and Related Information by Segment
32
Federal Income Taxes
49
Financial Condition, Liquidity, Short-term Borrowings, and Capital Resources
50
Ratings
52
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
52
Contractual Obligations, Contingent Liabilities, and Commitments
53
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
53
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
53
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
54
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
54
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
55
Item 6.
Exhibits
56
Signatures
57
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
SELECTIVE INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Unaudited
($ in thousands, except share amounts)
June 30,
2014
December 31,
2013
ASSETS
Investments:
Fixed income securities, held-to-maturity – at carrying value (fair value: $385,502 – 2014; $416,981 – 2013)
$
364,938
392,879
Fixed income securities, available-for-sale – at fair value (amortized cost: $3,792,036 – 2014; $3,675,977 – 2013)
3,890,200
3,715,536
Equity securities, available-for-sale – at fair value (cost: $166,214 – 2014; $155,350 – 2013)
211,348
192,771
Short-term investments (at cost which approximates fair value)
166,488
174,251
Other investments
106,125
107,875
Total investments (Note 5)
4,739,099
4,583,312
Cash
1,547
193
Interest and dividends due or accrued
37,747
37,382
Premiums receivable, net of allowance for uncollectible accounts of: $3,733 – 2014; $4,442 – 2013
589,617
524,870
Reinsurance recoverables, net
558,758
550,897
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
148,256
143,000
Current federal income tax
—
512
Deferred federal income tax
97,401
122,613
Property and equipment – at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of:
$184,748 – 2014; $179,192 – 2013
53,836
50,834
Deferred policy acquisition costs
182,087
172,981
Goodwill
7,849
7,849
Other assets
74,388
75,727
Total assets
$
6,490,585
6,270,170
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities:
Reserve for loss and loss expenses
$
3,451,306
3,349,770
Unearned premiums
1,100,864
1,059,155
Notes payable
392,290
392,414
Current federal income tax
10,150
—
Accrued salaries and benefits
84,870
111,427
Other liabilities
213,030
203,476
Total liabilities
$
5,252,510
5,116,242
Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock of $0 par value per share:
$
—
—
Authorized shares 5,000,000; no shares issued or outstanding
Common stock of $2 par value per share:
Authorized shares 360,000,000
Issued: 99,697,374 – 2014; 99,120,235 – 2013
199,395
198,240
Additional paid-in capital
298,352
288,182
Retained earnings
1,234,462
1,202,015
Accumulated other comprehensive income (Note 10)
68,012
24,851
Treasury stock – at cost
(shares: 43,323,441– 2014; 43,198,622 – 2013)
(562,146
)
(559,360
)
Total stockholders’ equity
1,238,075
1,153,928
Commitments and contingencies
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
6,490,585
6,270,170
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.
1
Table of Contents
SELECTIVE INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Quarter ended June 30,
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
2014
2013
2014
2013
Revenues:
Net premiums earned
$
463,625
426,252
920,120
847,192
Net investment income earned
36,774
34,003
72,308
66,873
Net realized gains:
Net realized investment gains
4,958
5,709
13,139
11,013
Other-than-temporary impairments
(419
)
(508
)
(1,382
)
(2,427
)
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed income securities recognized in other comprehensive income
—
(47
)
—
(77
)
Total net realized gains
4,539
5,154
11,757
8,509
Other income
1,911
3,536
11,735
6,320
Total revenues
506,849
468,945
1,015,920
928,894
Expenses:
Loss and loss expense incurred
297,795
279,594
618,341
549,443
Policy acquisition costs
155,173
143,728
304,439
283,256
Interest expense
5,425
5,570
10,986
11,401
Other expenses
8,935
3,852
17,549
19,725
Total expenses
467,328
432,744
951,315
863,825
Income from continuing operations, before federal income tax
39,521
36,201
64,605
65,069
Federal income tax expense:
Current
8,781
6,221
15,319
13,674
Deferred
1,399
2,858
1,971
1,968
Total federal income tax expense
10,180
9,079
17,290
15,642
Net income from continuing operations
29,341
27,122
47,315
49,427
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax of $(538)
–
2013
—
—
—
(997
)
Net income
$
29,341
27,122
47,315
48,430
Earnings per share:
Basic net income from continuing operations
$
0.52
0.49
0.84
0.89
Basic net loss from discontinued operations
—
—
—
(0.02
)
Basic net income
$
0.52
0.49
0.84
0.87
Diluted net income from continuing operations
$
0.51
0.48
0.83
0.88
Diluted net loss from discontinued operations
—
—
—
(0.02
)
Diluted net income
$
0.51
0.48
0.83
0.86
Dividends to stockholders
$
0.13
0.13
0.26
0.26
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
SELECTIVE INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Quarter ended June 30,
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in thousands)
2014
2013
2014
2013
Net income
$
29,341
27,122
47,315
48,430
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period
29,329
(59,353
)
50,755
(56,959
)
Non-credit portion of other-than-temporary impairments recognized in other comprehensive income
—
31
—
50
Amount reclassified into net income:
Held-to-maturity securities
(144
)
(399
)
(440
)
(865
)
Non-credit other-than-temporary impairments
305
3
305
8
Realized gains on available for sale securities
(3,255
)
(3,438
)
(7,954
)
(7,322
)
Total unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities
26,235
(63,156
)
42,666
(65,088
)
Defined benefit pension and post-retirement plans:
Net actuarial gain
—
—
—
28,600
Amounts reclassified into net income:
Net actuarial loss
248
513
495
1,709
Prior service cost
—
—
—
6
Curtailment expense
—
—
—
11
Total defined benefit pension and post-retirement plans
248
513
495
30,326
Other comprehensive income (loss)
26,483
(62,643
)
43,161
(34,762
)
Comprehensive income (loss)
$
55,824
(35,521
)
90,476
13,668
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
SELECTIVE INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in thousands)
2014
2013
Common stock:
Beginning of year
$
198,240
196,388
Dividend reinvestment plan (shares: 29,949 – 2014; 33,514 – 2013)
60
67
Stock purchase and compensation plans (shares: 547,190 – 2014; 682,661 – 2013)
1,095
1,366
End of period
199,395
197,821
Additional paid-in capital:
Beginning of year
288,182
270,654
Dividend reinvestment plan
642
703
Stock purchase and compensation plans
9,528
10,657
End of period
298,352
282,014
Retained earnings:
Beginning of year
1,202,015
1,125,154
Net income
47,315
48,430
Dividends to stockholders ($0.26 per share – 2014 and 2013)
(14,868
)
(14,723
)
End of period
1,234,462
1,158,861
Accumulated other comprehensive income:
Beginning of year
24,851
54,040
Other comprehensive income (loss)
43,161
(34,762
)
End of period
68,012
19,278
Treasury stock:
Beginning of year
(559,360
)
(555,644
)
Acquisition of treasury stock (shares: 124,819 – 2014; 151,113 – 2013)
(2,786
)
(3,285
)
End of period
(562,146
)
(558,929
)
Total stockholders’ equity
$
1,238,075
1,099,045
Selective Insurance Group, Inc. also has authorized, but not issued,
5,000,000
shares of preferred stock, without par value, of which
300,000
shares have been
designated Series A junior preferred stock, without par value.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
SELECTIVE INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in thousands)
2014
2013
Operating Activities
Net income
$
47,315
48,430
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
18,912
23,103
Sale of renewal rights
(8,000
)
—
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations
—
997
Stock-based compensation expense
6,102
6,189
Undistributed (gains) losses of equity method investments
(138
)
419
Net realized gains
(11,757
)
(8,509
)
Retirement income plan curtailment expense
—
16
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Increase in reserve for loss and loss expenses, net of reinsurance recoverables
93,675
69,790
Increase in unearned premiums, net of prepaid reinsurance and advance premiums
36,997
65,225
Decrease in net federal income taxes
12,634
3,171
Increase in premiums receivable
(64,747
)
(84,135
)
Increase in deferred policy acquisition costs
(9,106
)
(9,555
)
Increase in interest and dividends due or accrued
(361
)
(1,066
)
Decrease in accrued salaries and benefits
(26,557
)
(6,173
)
Decrease in accrued insurance expenses
(16,872
)
(5,478
)
Other-net
(5,425
)
(4,526
)
Net adjustments
25,357
49,468
Net cash provided by operating activities
72,672
97,898
Investing Activities
Purchase of fixed income securities, available-for-sale
(339,362
)
(530,402
)
Purchase of equity securities, available-for-sale
(111,886
)
(42,546
)
Purchase of other investments
(6,039
)
(4,393
)
Purchase of short-term investments
(764,692
)
(1,116,873
)
Sale of subsidiary
—
1,225
Sale of fixed income securities, available-for-sale
19,557
6,851
Sale of short-term investments
772,455
1,144,853
Redemption and maturities of fixed income securities, held-to-maturity
28,595
48,186
Redemption and maturities of fixed income securities, available-for-sale
222,568
286,905
Sale of equity securities, available-for-sale
111,996
42,206
Distributions from other investments
7,726
6,077
Purchase of property and equipment
(6,628
)
(6,761
)
Sale of renewal rights
8,000
—
Net cash used in investing activities
(57,710
)
(164,672
)
Financing Activities
Dividends to stockholders
(13,914
)
(13,668
)
Acquisition of treasury stock
(2,786
)
(3,285
)
Net proceeds from stock purchase and compensation plans
3,091
3,769
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable, net of debt issuance costs
—
178,435
Repayment of notes payable
—
(100,000
)
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements
955
1,467
Repayments of capital lease obligations
(954
)
—
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(13,608
)
66,718
Net increase (decrease) in cash
1,354
(56
)
Cash, beginning of year
193
210
Cash, end of period
$
1,547
154
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. Organization
Selective Insurance Group, Inc., through its subsidiaries, (collectively referred to as “we,” “us,” or “our”) offers standard and excess and surplus lines (“E&S”) property and casualty insurance products. Selective Insurance Group, Inc. (referred to as the “Parent”) was incorporated in New Jersey in 1977 and its main offices are located in Branchville, New Jersey. The Parent’s common stock is publicly traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “SIGI.”
We classify our business into
three
operating segments:
•
Our Standard Insurance Operations segment, which is comprised of both commercial lines ("Commercial Lines") and personal lines ("Personal Lines") business, sells property and casualty insurance products and services in the standard market, including flood insurance through the National Flood Insurance Program's ("NFIPs") write-your-own ("WYO") program;
•
Our E&S Insurance Operations segment sells Commercial Lines property and casualty insurance products and services to insureds who have not obtained coverage in the standard market; and
•
Our Investments segment, which invests the premiums collected by our Standard and E&S Insurance Operations and amounts generated through our capital management strategies, which may include the issuance of debt and equity securities.
NOTE 2. Basis of Presentation
These interim unaudited consolidated financial statements (“Financial Statements”) include the accounts of the Parent and its subsidiaries, and have been prepared in conformity with: (i) U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”); and (ii) the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regarding interim financial reporting. The preparation of the Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported financial statement balances, as well as the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions between the Parent and its subsidiaries are eliminated in consolidation.
These Financial Statements reflect all adjustments that, in our opinion, are normal, recurring, and necessary for a fair presentation of our results of operations and financial condition. The Financial Statements cover the
second
quarters ended
June 30, 2014
(“
Second Quarter 2014
”) and
June 30, 2013
(“
Second Quarter 2013
”) and the
six
-month periods ended
June 30, 2014
("
Six Months 2014
") and
June 30, 2013
("
Six Months 2013
"). The Financial Statements do not include all of the information and disclosures required by GAAP and the SEC for audited annual financial statements. Results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. Consequently, the Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2013
(“
2013 Annual Report
”) filed with the SEC.
NOTE 3. Adoption of Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2013-11,
Income Taxes, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)
("ASU 2013-11").
ASU 2013-11 applies to all entities with unrecognized tax benefits that also have tax loss or tax credit carryforwards in the same tax jurisdiction as of the reporting date. An unrecognized tax benefit is the difference between a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and the benefit that is more likely than not sustainable under examination. Under ASU 2013-11, an entity must net an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, against deferred tax assets for a net operating loss ("NOL") carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward except when:
•
An NOL carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryfoward is not available as of the reporting date under the governing tax law to settle taxes that would result from the disallowance of the tax position; or
•
The entity does not intend to use the deferred tax asset for this purpose. If either of these conditions exists, an entity should present an unrecognized tax benefit in the financial statements as a liability and should not net the unrecognized tax benefit with a deferred tax asset.
ASU 2013-11 was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of this guidance did not impact our financial condition or results of operation.
6
Table of Contents
Pronouncements to be effective in the future
In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-01,
Accounting for Investments in Qualified Affordable Housing Projects
("ASU 2014-01"). ASU 2014-01 applies to all reporting entities that invest in flow-through limited liability entities that manage or invest in affordable housing projects that qualify for a low-income housing tax credit.
ASU 2014-01 permits reporting entities to make an accounting policy election to account for their investments in qualified affordable housing projects using a newly defined "proportional amortization method" if certain conditions are met. Under the proportional amortization method, an entity amortizes the initial cost of the investment in proportion to the tax credits and other tax benefits received and recognizes the net investment performance in the income statement as components of income tax expense (benefit). For those investments in qualified affordable housing projects not accounted for using the proportional amortization method, the investment is required to be accounted for as an equity method investment or a cost method investment.
ASU 2014-01 is effective for public business entities for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. The adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12,
Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period
(“ASU 2014-12”). ASU 2014-12 applies to all reporting entities that grant their employees share-based payments in which the terms of the award provide that a performance target that affects vesting could be achieved after the requisite service period. That is the case when an employee is eligible to retire or otherwise terminate employment before the end of the period in which a performance target could be achieved and still be eligible to vest in the award if and when the performance target is achieved. ASU 2014-12 is intended to resolve the diverse accounting treatment of these types of awards in practice. Many reporting entities were accounting for these types of performance targets as non-vesting conditions that affect the grant-date fair value of the award while other entities treated these performance targets as performance conditions that do not affect the grant-date fair value of the award. ASU 2014-12 clarifies that these types of performance targets should be treated as performance conditions that do not impact the grant-date fair value of the award.
This guidance is effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. The implementation of ASU 2014-12 will not affect us, as we are currently recording expense consistent with the requirements of this accounting update.
NOTE 4. Statements of Cash Flow
Supplemental cash flow information for
Six Months 2014
and
2013
are as follows:
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in thousands)
2014
2013
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest
$
11,113
10,295
Federal income tax
3,699
11,000
Non-cash items:
Tax-free exchange of fixed income securities, available-for-sale ("AFS")
9,180
13,615
Tax-free exchange of fixed income securities, held-to-maturity ("HTM")
15
10,710
Stock split related to equity securities, AFS
334
—
Assets acquired under capital lease arrangements
2,124
1,898
At
June 30, 2014
, included in "Other assets" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets was
$8.5 million
of cash received from the NFIP, which is restricted to pay flood claims under the WYO program.
7
Table of Contents
NOTE 5. Investments
(a) The amortized cost, net unrealized gains and losses, carrying value, unrecognized holding gains and losses, and fair value of HTM fixed income securities as of
June 30, 2014
and December 31, 2013 were as follows:
June 30, 2014
($ in thousands)
Amortized
Cost
Net
Unrealized Gains
(Losses)
Carrying
Value
Unrecognized
Holding
Gains
Unrecognized Holding
Losses
Fair
Value
Foreign government
$
5,292
90
5,382
137
—
5,519
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
327,898
2,942
330,840
15,884
—
346,724
Corporate securities
21,893
(347
)
21,546
2,972
(5
)
24,513
Asset-backed securities (“ABS”)
3,260
(583
)
2,677
608
—
3,285
Commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”)
5,015
(522
)
4,493
968
—
5,461
Total HTM fixed income securities
$
363,358
1,580
364,938
20,569
(5
)
385,502
December 31, 2013
($ in thousands)
Amortized
Cost
Net
Unrealized Gains
(Losses)
Carrying
Value
Unrecognized
Holding
Gains
Unrecognized Holding
Losses
Fair
Value
Foreign government
$
5,292
131
5,423
168
—
5,591
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
348,109
4,013
352,122
17,634
—
369,756
Corporate securities
28,174
(346
)
27,828
2,446
—
30,274
ABS
3,413
(655
)
2,758
657
—
3,415
CMBS
5,634
(886
)
4,748
3,197
—
7,945
Total HTM fixed income securities
$
390,622
2,257
392,879
24,102
—
416,981
Unrecognized holding gains and losses of HTM securities are not reflected in the Financial Statements, as they represent fair value fluctuations from the later of: (i) the date a security is designated as HTM; or (ii) the date that an other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) charge is recognized on an HTM security, through the date of the balance sheet. Our HTM securities had an average duration of
1.9 years
as of
June 30, 2014
.
(b) The cost/amortized cost, unrealized gains and losses, and fair value of AFS securities as of
June 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
were as follows:
June 30, 2014
($ in thousands)
Cost/
Amortized
Cost
Unrealized
Gains
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
U.S. government and government agencies
$
149,537
9,474
(202
)
158,809
Foreign government
27,046
983
(1
)
28,028
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
1,080,039
30,696
(3,681
)
1,107,054
Corporate securities
1,730,192
56,587
(4,186
)
1,782,593
ABS
131,434
945
(210
)
132,169
CMBS
1
170,298
3,246
(1,073
)
172,471
Residential mortgage-backed
securities (“RMBS”)
2
503,490
9,534
(3,948
)
509,076
AFS fixed income securities
3,792,036
111,465
(13,301
)
3,890,200
AFS equity securities
166,214
45,137
(3
)
211,348
Total AFS securities
$
3,958,250
156,602
(13,304
)
4,101,548
8
Table of Contents
December 31, 2013
($ in thousands)
Cost/
Amortized
Cost
Unrealized
Gains
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
U.S. government and government agencies
$
163,218
10,661
(504
)
173,375
Foreign government
29,781
906
(72
)
30,615
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
946,455
25,194
(20,025
)
951,624
Corporate securities
1,707,928
44,004
(17,049
)
1,734,883
ABS
140,430
934
(468
)
140,896
CMBS
1
172,288
2,462
(3,466
)
171,284
RMBS
2
515,877
7,273
(10,291
)
512,859
AFS fixed income securities
3,675,977
91,434
(51,875
)
3,715,536
AFS equity securities
155,350
37,517
(96
)
192,771
Total AFS securities
$
3,831,327
128,951
(51,971
)
3,908,307
1
CMBS includes government guaranteed agency securities with a fair value of
$23.7 million
at
June 30, 2014
and
$30.0 million
at
December 31, 2013
.
2
RMBS includes government guaranteed agency securities with a fair value of
$41.8 million
at
June 30, 2014
and
$55.2 million
at
December 31, 2013
.
Unrealized gains and losses of AFS securities represent fair value fluctuations from the later of: (i) the date a security is designated as AFS; or (ii) the date that an OTTI charge is recognized on an AFS security, through the date of the balance sheet. These unrealized gains and losses are recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI") on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(c) The following tables summarize, for all securities in a net unrealized/unrecognized loss position at
June 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
, the fair value and gross pre-tax net unrealized/unrecognized loss by asset class and by length of time those securities have been in a net loss position:
June 30, 2014
Less than 12 months
12 months or longer
($ in thousands)
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
1
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
1
AFS securities
U.S. government and government agencies
$
—
—
13,284
(202
)
Foreign government
—
—
2,997
(1
)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
54,331
(187
)
246,340
(3,494
)
Corporate securities
55,362
(186
)
170,034
(4,000
)
ABS
14,992
(28
)
14,215
(182
)
CMBS
4,939
(4
)
58,286
(1,069
)
RMBS
2,761
(13
)
169,064
(3,935
)
Total fixed income securities
132,385
(418
)
674,220
(12,883
)
Equity securities
170
(3
)
—
—
Subtotal
$
132,555
(421
)
674,220
(12,883
)
Less than 12 months
12 months or longer
($ in thousands)
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
1
Unrecognized
Losses
2
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
1
Unrecognized
Gains
2
HTM securities
Corporate securities
1,482
3
(5
)
—
—
—
ABS
—
—
—
2,496
(583
)
564
Subtotal
$
1,482
3
(5
)
2,496
(583
)
564
Total AFS and HTM
$
134,037
(418
)
(5
)
676,716
(13,466
)
564
9
Table of Contents
December 31, 2013
Less than 12 months
12 months or longer
($ in thousands)
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
1
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
1
AFS securities
U.S. government and government agencies
$
16,955
(500
)
507
(4
)
Foreign government
2,029
(30
)
2,955
(42
)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
442,531
(19,120
)
13,530
(905
)
Corporate securities
511,100
(15,911
)
14,771
(1,138
)
ABS
68,725
(468
)
—
—
CMBS
100,396
(2,950
)
6,298
(516
)
RMBS
268,943
(10,031
)
2,670
(260
)
Total fixed income securities
1,410,679
(49,010
)
40,731
(2,865
)
Equity securities
1,124
(96
)
—
—
Subtotal
$
1,411,803
(49,106
)
40,731
(2,865
)
Less than 12 months
12 months or longer
($ in thousands)
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
1
Unrecognized
Gains
2
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
1
Unrecognized
Gains
2
HTM securities
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
$
65
(5
)
5
441
(20
)
14
ABS
—
—
—
2,490
(655
)
621
Subtotal
65
(5
)
5
2,931
(675
)
635
Total AFS and HTM
$
1,411,868
(49,111
)
5
43,662
(3,540
)
635
1
Gross unrealized losses include non-OTTI unrealized amounts and OTTI losses recognized in AOCI. In addition, this column includes remaining unrealized gain or loss amounts on securities that were transferred to an HTM designation in the first quarter of 2009 for those securities that are in a net unrealized/unrecognized loss position.
2
Unrecognized gains represent fair value fluctuations from the later of: (i) the date a security is designated as HTM; or (ii) the date that an OTTI charge is recognized on an HTM security.
As evidenced by the table below, our net unrealized/unrecognized loss positions improved by
$38.7 million
as of
June 30, 2014
compared to
December 31, 2013
as follows:
($ in thousands)
June 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
Number of
Issues
% of Market/Book
Unrealized/
Unrecognized Loss
Number of
Issues
% of
Market/Book
Unrealized/
Unrecognized
Loss
288
80% - 99%
$
13,325
556
80% - 99%
$
51,835
—
60% - 79%
—
1
60% - 79%
176
—
40% - 59%
—
—
40% - 59%
—
—
20% - 39%
—
—
20% - 39%
—
—
0% - 19%
—
—
0% - 19%
—
$
13,325
$
52,011
We have reviewed the securities in the tables above in accordance with our OTTI policy, as described in Note 2. “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” of our
2013 Annual Report
.
At
June 30, 2014
, we had
288
securities in an aggregate unrealized/unrecognized loss position of
$13.3 million
, compared to
557
securities in an aggregate unrealized/unrecognized loss position of
$52.0 million
at December 31, 2013. This improvement was driven by a lower interest rate environment, as interest rates on the 10-year U.S. Treasury Note fell by
50
basis points in Six Months 2014. This interest rate movement had a positive impact on our fixed income securities portfolio's valuation, thus decreasing the number of securities in a loss position and the corresponding dollar amount of unrealized losses.
10
Table of Contents
At June 30, 2014,
$12.9 million
of the aggregate unrealized/unrecognized losses related to securities that have been in a loss position for more than 12 months, while at December 31, 2013, these losses amounted to only
$2.9 million
. Despite these securities being in a loss position, the nature of the loss is interest-rate related as opposed to credit-related concerns, as was evidenced by the fact that the severity of impairment on these securities improved from an average of
6%
of its amortized cost at year end to an average of
2%
of its amortized cost at the end of the second quarter. This movement is reflective of the overall interest rate decline experienced during the year.
For a discussion regarding the impact of interest rate movements on our fixed income securities portfolio, refer to Item 7A. "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk." in our 2013 Annual Report.
We do not intend to sell any securities in an unrealized/unrecognized loss position, nor do we believe we will be required to sell these securities, and therefore we have concluded that they are temporarily impaired as of
June 30, 2014
. This conclusion reflects our current judgment as to the financial position and future prospects of the entity that issued the investment security and underlying collateral. If our judgment about an individual security changes in the future, we may ultimately record a credit loss after having originally concluded that one did not exist, which could have a material impact on our net income and financial position in future periods.
(d) Fixed income securities at
June 30, 2014
, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Mortgage-backed securities ("MBS") are included in the maturity tables using the estimated average life of each security. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations, with or without call or prepayment penalties.
Listed below are HTM fixed income securities at
June 30, 2014
:
($ in thousands)
Carrying Value
Fair Value
Due in one year or less
$
113,394
115,199
Due after one year through five years
230,116
245,500
Due after five years through 10 years
21,428
24,803
Total HTM fixed income securities
$
364,938
385,502
Listed below are AFS fixed income securities at
June 30, 2014
:
($ in thousands)
Fair Value
Due in one year or less
$
401,681
Due after one year through five years
2,007,460
Due after five years through 10 years
1,404,203
Due after 10 years
76,856
Total AFS fixed income securities
$
3,890,200
(e) The following table summarizes our other investment portfolio by strategy and the remaining commitment amount associated with each strategy:
Other Investments
Carrying Value
June 30,
2014
($ in thousands)
June 30,
2014
December 31,
2013
Remaining Commitment
Alternative Investments
Secondary private equity
$
23,575
25,618
7,230
Private equity
21,388
20,192
9,917
Energy/power generation
17,802
17,361
6,984
Mezzanine financing
13,243
12,738
14,470
Real estate
11,039
11,698
10,131
Distressed debt
9,947
11,579
2,971
Venture capital
7,089
7,025
350
Total alternative investments
104,083
106,211
52,053
Other securities
2,042
1,664
597
Total other investments
$
106,125
107,875
52,650
11
Table of Contents
For a description of our seven alternative investment strategies, as well as information regarding redemption, restrictions, and fund liquidations, refer to Note 5. “Investments” in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” of our
2013 Annual Report
.
The following table sets forth gross summarized financial information for our other investments portfolio, including the portion not owned by us. The investments are carried under the equity method of accounting. The last line of the table below reflects our share of the aggregate income, which is the portion included in our Financial Statements. As the majority of these investments report results to us on a one quarter lag, the summarized financial statement information for the three and
six
-month periods ended March 31 is as follows:
Income Statement Information
Quarter ended March 31,
Six Months ended March 31,
($ in millions)
2014
2013
2014
2013
Net investment income
$
22.8
46.8
$
85.7
255.0
Realized gains (losses)
74.2
(22.1
)
197.6
599.7
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
207.6
378.8
842.4
(18.9
)
Net income
$
304.6
403.5
$
1,125.7
835.8
Selective’s insurance subsidiaries’ other investments income
$
3.6
3.9
$
8.8
7.5
(f) We have pledged certain AFS fixed income securities and short-term investments as collateral related to: (i) our outstanding borrowing of
$58 million
with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis ("FHLBI"); and (ii) our reinsurance obligations related to our 2011 acquisition of our E&S book of business. In addition, certain securities were on deposit with various state and regulatory agencies to comply with insurance laws. We retain all rights regarding all securities pledged as collateral.
The following table summarizes the market value of these securities at
June 30, 2014
:
($ in millions)
FHLBI Collateral
Reinsurance Collateral
State and Regulatory Deposits
Total
U.S. government and government agencies
$
22.9
—
26.0
48.9
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
—
5.7
—
5.7
Corporate securities
—
5.3
—
5.3
ABS
—
2.0
—
2.0
CMBS
1.9
—
—
1.9
RMBS
36.8
3.2
—
40.0
Total fixed income securities
$
61.6
16.2
26.0
103.8
Short-term investments
—
0.2
—
0.2
Total pledged as collateral
$
61.6
16.4
26.0
104.0
(g) The components of pre-tax net investment income earned for the periods indicated were as follows:
Quarter ended June 30,
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in thousands)
2014
2013
2014
2013
Fixed income securities
$
33,781
30,298
$
64,809
$
60,387
Equity securities
1,736
1,874
3,185
3,081
Short-term investments
14
29
33
81
Other investments
3,553
3,869
8,771
7,471
Investment expenses
(2,310
)
(2,067
)
(4,490
)
(4,147
)
Net investment income earned
$
36,774
34,003
72,308
66,873
12
Table of Contents
(h) The following tables summarize OTTI by asset type for the periods indicated:
Second Quarter 2014
Gross
Included in Other
Comprehensive
Income (“OCI”)
Recognized in
Earnings
($ in thousands)
AFS securities
Equity securities
$
419
—
419
Total AFS Securities
419
—
419
OTTI losses
$
419
—
419
Second Quarter 2013
Gross
Included in OCI
Recognized in Earnings
($ in thousands)
HTM fixed income securities
ABS
$
(44
)
(47
)
3
Total HTM fixed income securities
(44
)
(47
)
3
Equity securities
429
—
429
Total AFS securities
429
—
429
Other investments
123
—
123
OTTI losses
$
508
(47
)
555
Six Months 2014
Gross
Included in OCI
Recognized in
Earnings
($ in thousands)
AFS securities
Equity securities
$
1,382
—
1,382
Total AFS Securities
1,382
—
1,382
OTTI losses
$
1,382
—
1,382
Six Months 2013
Gross
Included in OCI
Recognized in Earnings
($ in thousands)
HTM fixed income securities
ABS
$
(44
)
(47
)
3
Total HTM fixed income securities
(44
)
(47
)
3
AFS fixed income securities
RMBS
(22
)
(30
)
8
Total AFS fixed income securities
(22
)
(30
)
8
Equity securities
646
—
646
Total AFS securities
624
(30
)
654
Other investments
1,847
—
1,847
OTTI losses
$
2,427
(77
)
2,504
The OTTI charges in
Second Quarter 2014
and
Six Months 2014
relate to equity securities for which we have the intent to sell. The majority of the OTTI charges in
Six Months 2013
related to an investment in a limited liability company within our other investments portfolio that had sustained significant losses for which we did not anticipate recovery. For a discussion of our evaluation for OTTI of fixed income securities, short-term investments, equity securities, and other investments, refer to Note 2. "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of our 2013 Annual Report.
13
Table of Contents
The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, credit loss impairments on fixed income securities for which a portion of the OTTI charge was recognized in OCI, and the corresponding changes in such amounts:
Quarter ended June 30,
($ in thousands)
2014
2013
Balance, beginning of period
$
7,488
7,486
Addition for the amount related to credit loss for which an OTTI was not previously recognized
—
—
Reductions for securities sold during the period
(1,954
)
—
Reductions for securities for which the amount previously recognized in OCI was recognized in earnings because of intention or potential requirement to sell before recovery of amortized cost
—
—
Reductions for securities for which the entire amount previously recognized in OCI was recognized in earnings due to a decrease in cash flows expected
—
—
Additional increases to the amount related to credit loss for which an OTTI was previously recognized
—
2
Accretion of credit loss impairments previously recognized due to an increase in cash flows expected to be collected
—
—
Balance, end of period
$
5,534
7,488
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in thousands)
2014
2013
Balance, beginning of period
$
7,488
7,477
Addition for the amount related to credit loss for which an OTTI was not previously recognized
—
—
Reductions for securities sold during the period
(1,954
)
—
Reductions for securities for which the amount previously recognized in OCI was recognized in earnings because of intention or potential requirement to sell before recovery of amortized cost
—
—
Reductions for securities for which the entire amount previously recognized in OCI was recognized in earnings due to a decrease in cash flows expected
—
—
Additional increases to the amount related to credit loss for which an OTTI was previously recognized
—
11
Accretion of credit loss impairments previously recognized due to an increase in cash flows expected to be collected
—
—
Balance, end of period
$
5,534
7,488
(i) The components of net realized gains, excluding OTTI charges, for the periods indicated were as follows:
Quarter ended June 30,
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in thousands)
2014
2013
2014
2013
HTM fixed income securities
Gains
$
3
3
3
3
Losses
(3
)
(12
)
(14
)
(49
)
AFS fixed income securities
Gains
780
967
938
1,918
Losses
(31
)
(46
)
(143
)
(299
)
AFS equity securities
Gains
4,362
4,800
12,679
10,471
Losses
(153
)
(3
)
(324
)
(171
)
Other investments
Gains
—
—
—
—
Losses
—
—
—
(860
)
Total other net realized investment gains
4,958
5,709
13,139
11,013
Total OTTI charges recognized in earnings
(419
)
(555
)
(1,382
)
(2,504
)
Total net realized gains
$
4,539
5,154
11,757
8,509
Realized gains and losses on the sale of investments are determined on the basis of the cost of the specific investments sold. The
$5.0 million
and
$13.1 million
in net realized gains in
Second Quarter
and
Six Months 2014
, respectively, were primarily related to the sale of AFS equity securities due to the rebalancing of our high dividend yield strategy holdings within our equity portfolio.
14
Table of Contents
Of the
$5.7 million
and
$11.0 million
in net realized gains in
Second Quarter
and
Six Months 2013
,
$4.7 million
related to the sale of a private equity security due to the acquisition of this investment by a third party. In addition,
$5.6 million
in net realized gains in
Six Months 2013
were related to the sale of AFS equity securities due to the rebalancing of our high dividend yield strategy holdings within our equity portfolio.
Proceeds from the sale of AFS securities were
$68.7 million
in
Second Quarter 2014
and
$131.6 million
in
Six Months 2014
, and
$42.2 million
and
$49.1 million
in the same periods a year ago.
NOTE 6. Fair Value Measurements
The following table presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our financial instruments as of
June 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
:
June 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
($ in thousands)
Carrying Amount
Fair
Value
Carrying Amount
Fair
Value
Financial Assets
Fixed income securities:
HTM
$
364,938
385,502
392,879
416,981
AFS
3,890,200
3,890,200
3,715,536
3,715,536
Equity securities, AFS
211,348
211,348
192,771
192,771
Short-term investments
166,488
166,488
174,251
174,251
Financial Liabilities
Notes payable:
2.90% borrowings from FHLBI
13,000
13,165
13,000
13,319
1.25% borrowings from FHLBI
45,000
45,338
45,000
45,259
7.25% Senior Notes
49,895
55,527
49,916
50,887
6.70% Senior Notes
99,395
110,926
99,498
98,247
5.875% Senior Notes
185,000
174,714
185,000
146,298
Total notes payable
$
392,290
399,670
392,414
354,010
The fair values of our financial assets and liabilities are generated using various valuation techniques and are placed into the fair value hierarchy considering the following: (i) the highest priority is given to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1); (ii) the next highest priority is given to quoted prices in markets that are not active or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets in markets that are not active and other inputs that can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets (Level 2); and (iii) the lowest priority is given to unobservable inputs supported by little or no market activity and that reflect our assumptions about the exit price, including assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset (Level 3). An asset or liability's classification within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of significant input to its valuation. Transfers between levels in the fair value hierarchy are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
For a discussion of the techniques used to value the majority of our financial assets and liabilities, refer to Note 2. "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of our 2013 Annual Report.
15
Table of Contents
The following tables provide quantitative disclosures of our financial assets that were measured at fair value at
June 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
:
June 30, 2014
Fair Value Measurements Using
($ in thousands)
Assets
Measured at
Fair Value
at 6/30/2014
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets/
Liabilities (Level 1)
1
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
1
Significant Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Description
Measured on a recurring basis:
AFS:
U.S. government and government agencies
$
158,809
52,552
106,257
—
Foreign government
28,028
—
28,028
—
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
1,107,054
—
1,107,054
—
Corporate securities
1,782,593
—
1,782,593
—
ABS
132,169
—
132,169
—
CMBS
172,471
—
172,471
—
RMBS
509,076
—
509,076
—
Total AFS fixed income securities
3,890,200
52,552
3,837,648
—
Equity securities
211,348
208,448
—
2,900
Total AFS Securities
4,101,548
261,000
3,837,648
2,900
Short-term investments
166,488
166,488
—
—
Total assets measured at fair value
$
4,268,036
427,488
3,837,648
2,900
1
There were no transfers of securities between Level 1 and Level 2.
December 31, 2013
Fair Value Measurements Using
($ in thousands)
Assets
Measured at
Fair Value
at 12/31/13
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets/Liabilities
(Level 1)
1
Significant
Other Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
1
Significant Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Description
Measured on a recurring basis:
AFS:
U.S. government and government agencies
$
173,375
52,153
121,222
—
Foreign government
30,615
—
30,615
—
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
951,624
—
951,624
—
Corporate securities
1,734,883
—
1,734,883
—
ABS
140,896
—
140,896
—
CMBS
171,284
—
171,284
—
RMBS
512,859
—
512,859
—
Total AFS fixed income securities
3,715,536
52,153
3,663,383
—
Equity securities
192,771
189,871
—
2,900
Total AFS Securities
3,908,307
242,024
3,663,383
2,900
Short-term investments
174,251
174,251
—
—
Total assets measured at fair value
$
4,082,558
416,275
3,663,383
2,900
1
There were no transfers of securities between Level 1 and Level 2.
16
Table of Contents
There have been no changes in the fair value of securities measured using Level 3 prices during Six Months 2014. The following table provides a summary of these changes during
2013
:
December 31, 2013
($ in thousands)
Government
Corporate
ABS
CMBS
Equity
Receivable for
Proceeds
Related to Sale
of Selective HR Solutions ("Selective HR")
Total
Fair value, December 31, 2012
$
19,789
2,946
6,068
7,162
3,607
2,705
42,277
Total net (losses) gains for the period included in:
OCI
1
(537
)
(7
)
(74
)
772
3,935
—
4,089
Net income
2,3
(76
)
—
—
361
—
(1,480
)
(1,195
)
Purchases
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Sales
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Issuances
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Settlements
(1,847
)
(168
)
—
(2,420
)
—
(225
)
(4,660
)
Transfers into Level 3
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Transfers out of Level 3
(17,329
)
(2,771
)
(5,994
)
(5,875
)
(4,642
)
(1,000
)
(37,611
)
Fair value, December 31, 2013
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
2,900
$
—
$
2,900
1
Amounts are reported in “Unrealized holding (losses) gains arising during period” on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income in our
2013 Annual Report
.
2
Amounts are reported in “Net realized gains” for realized gains and losses and “Net investment income earned” for amortization of securities on the Consolidated Statements of Income in our
2013 Annual Report
.
3
For the receivable related to the sale of Selective HR, amounts in "Loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax" relate to an impairment charge and amounts in "Other income" relate to interest accretion on the Consolidated Statements of Income in our
2013 Annual Report
.
As discussed in Note 2. "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies," in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." in our 2013 Annual Report, the fair value of our Level 3 fixed income securities is typically obtained through non-binding broker quotes based on unobservable inputs, which we review for reasonableness. There were no fixed income securities measured using Level 3 inputs at
June 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
. However, in
2013
, fixed income securities with a fair value of
$32.0 million
were transferred out of Level 3 during the year due to the availability of Level 2 pricing at
December 31, 2013
that was not available previously.
Equity securities with fair values of
$2.9 million
were measured using Level 3 inputs at
June 30, 2014
and at
December 31, 2013
. An equity security with a fair value of
$4.6 million
was transferred out of Level 3 during 2013 due to the availability of Level 2 pricing at the date of transfer. In addition, the receivable related to the sale of Selective HR was settled during 2013 and as a result was also transferred out of Level 3.
17
Table of Contents
The following tables provide quantitative information regarding our financial assets and liabilities that were disclosed at fair value at
June 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
:
June 30, 2014
Fair Value Measurements Using
($ in thousands)
Assets/
Liabilities
Disclosed at
Fair Value at 6/30/2014
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets/
Liabilities
(Level 1)
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Financial Assets
HTM:
Foreign government
$
5,519
—
5,519
—
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
346,724
—
346,724
—
Corporate securities
24,513
—
24,513
—
ABS
3,285
—
3,285
—
CMBS
5,461
—
5,461
—
Total HTM fixed income securities
$
385,502
—
385,502
—
Financial Liabilities
Notes payable:
2.90% borrowings from FHLBI
$
13,165
—
13,165
—
1.25% borrowings from FHLBI
45,338
—
45,338
—
7.25% Senior Notes
55,527
—
55,527
—
6.70% Senior Notes
110,926
—
110,926
—
5.875% Senior Notes
174,714
174,714
—
—
Total notes payable
$
399,670
174,714
224,956
—
December 31, 2013
Fair Value Measurements Using
($ in thousands)
Assets/
Liabilities
Disclosed at
Fair Value at 12/31/2013
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets/
Liabilities
(Level 1)
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Financial Assets
HTM:
Foreign government
$
5,591
—
5,591
—
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
369,756
—
369,756
—
Corporate securities
30,274
—
30,274
—
ABS
3,415
—
3,415
—
CMBS
7,945
—
7,945
—
Total HTM fixed income securities
$
416,981
—
416,981
—
Financial Liabilities
Notes payable:
2.90% borrowings from FHLBI
$
13,319
—
13,319
—
1.25% borrowings from FHLBI
45,259
—
45,259
—
7.25% Senior Notes
50,887
—
50,887
—
6.70% Senior Notes
98,247
—
98,247
—
5.875% Senior Notes
146,298
146,298
—
—
Total notes payable
$
354,010
146,298
207,712
—
18
Table of Contents
NOTE 7. Reinsurance
The following table contains a listing of direct, assumed, and ceded reinsurance amounts for premiums written, premiums earned, and loss and loss expenses incurred for the periods indicated. For more information concerning reinsurance, refer to Note 8. “Reinsurance” in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” of our
2013 Annual Report
.
Quarter ended June 30,
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in thousands)
2014
2013
2014
2013
Premiums written:
Direct
$
572,314
551,190
1,130,205
1,080,006
Assumed
5,837
4,378
13,687
12,860
Ceded
(98,328
)
(93,391
)
(187,319
)
(180,565
)
Net
$
479,823
462,177
956,573
912,301
Premiums earned:
Direct
$
544,913
504,081
1,081,613
998,147
Assumed
10,385
8,951
20,570
21,414
Ceded
(91,673
)
(86,780
)
(182,063
)
(172,369
)
Net
$
463,625
426,252
920,120
847,192
Loss and loss expense incurred:
Direct
$
332,707
338,954
691,056
704,600
Assumed
7,377
6,420
14,856
15,494
Ceded
(42,289
)
(65,780
)
(87,571
)
(170,651
)
Net
$
297,795
279,594
618,341
549,443
The growth in direct premiums written ("DPW") for our
ten
insurance subsidiaries ("Insurance Subsidiaries") in both
Second Quarter
and
Six Months 2014
compared to
Second Quarter
and
Six Months 2013
reflects pure price increases and retention that we have achieved in our Standard Insurance Operations.
Direct premiums earned increases in
Second Quarter 2014
and
Six Months 2014
were consistent with the fluctuation in DPW for the twelve-month period ended
June 30, 2014
as compared to the twelve-month period ended
June 30, 2013
.
The ceded premiums and losses related to our participation in the NFIP, under which
100%
of our flood premiums, losses, and loss expenses are ceded to the NFIP, are as follows:
Ceded to NFIP
Quarter ended June 30,
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in thousands)
2014
2013
2014
2013
Ceded premiums written
$
(65,775
)
(62,461
)
(123,078
)
(119,168
)
Ceded premiums earned
(59,213
)
(56,450
)
(117,499
)
(111,777
)
Ceded loss and loss expense incurred
(26,712
)
(51,725
)
(34,091
)
(127,901
)
19
Table of Contents
NOTE 8. Segment Information
The disaggregated results of our
three
operating segments are used by senior management to manage our operations. These segments are evaluated based on the following:
•
Our Standard Insurance Operations segment and our E&S Insurance Operations segment are evaluated based on statutory underwriting results (net premiums earned, incurred loss and loss expenses, policyholders dividends, policy acquisition costs, and other underwriting expenses), and statutory combined ratios; and
•
Our Investments segment is evaluated based on after-tax net investment income and net realized gains and losses.
In computing the results of each segment, we do not make adjustments for interest expense or net general corporate expenses. While we do not fully allocate taxes to all segments, we do allocate taxes to our Investments segment as we manage that segment on after-tax results. We do not maintain separate investment portfolios for the segments and therefore, do not allocate assets to the segments.
In the first quarter of 2014, we sold the renewal rights to our
$38 million
self-insured group, or "SIG," book of business within the Standard Insurance Operations segment. We decided to opportunistically sell this very small and specialized book of pooled business as a significant portion of the business was produced outside of our standard lines footprint, and proved difficult to grow. As this was a renewal rights sale, we will continue to service policies that were in force at the date of the sale. We continue to remain active in the municipal and public school marketplace for individual risks that procure traditional insurance programs rather than pooling arrangements. The proceeds from this sale, which amounted to
$8 million
, are included in "Miscellaneous income" within the table below as a component of the Standard Insurance Operations revenue.
The following summaries present revenues from continuing operations (net investment income and net realized gains on investments in the case of the Investments segment) and pre-tax income from continuing operations for the individual segments:
Revenue by Segment
Quarter ended June 30,
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in thousands)
2014
2013
2014
2013
Standard Insurance Operations:
Net premiums earned:
Commercial automobile
$
83,472
76,706
165,688
151,053
Workers compensation
68,992
64,855
138,405
130,939
General liability
111,591
99,766
220,409
197,469
Commercial property
61,226
54,937
121,412
108,352
Businessowners’ policies
21,279
18,625
42,148
37,165
Bonds
4,734
4,775
9,490
9,539
Other
3,213
2,993
6,396
5,985
Total Standard Commercial Lines
354,507
322,657
703,948
640,502
Personal automobile
38,022
38,526
76,248
76,919
Homeowners
33,576
31,702
66,874
62,837
Other
2,946
3,320
6,240
6,828
Total Standard Personal Lines
74,544
73,548
149,362
146,584
Total Standard Insurance Operations net premiums earned
429,051
396,205
853,310
787,086
Miscellaneous income
1,908
3,528
11,727
6,248
Total Standard Insurance Operations revenue
430,959
399,733
865,037
793,334
E&S Insurance Operations:
Net premiums earned
34,574
30,047
66,810
60,106
Investments:
Net investment income
36,774
34,003
72,308
66,873
Net realized investment gains
4,539
5,154
11,757
8,509
Total investment revenues
41,313
39,157
84,065
75,382
Total all segments
506,846
468,937
1,015,912
928,822
Other income
3
8
8
72
Total revenues from continuing operations
$
506,849
468,945
1,015,920
928,894
20
Table of Contents
Income from Continuing Operations before Federal Income Tax
Quarter ended June 30,
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in thousands)
2014
2013
2014
2013
Standard Insurance Operations:
Commercial Lines underwriting gain
$
15,703
9,743
$
12,073
15,845
Personal Lines underwriting (loss) gain
(5,582
)
(2,975
)
(7,942
)
2,998
Total Standard Insurance Operations underwriting gain, before federal income tax
10,121
6,768
4,131
18,843
GAAP combined ratio
97.6
%
98.3
99.5
%
97.6
Statutory combined ratio
97.3
%
97.0
99.2
%
96.9
E&S Insurance Operations:
Underwriting (loss) gain
(37
)
(2,285
)
938
(2,199
)
GAAP combined ratio
100.1
%
107.6
98.6
%
103.7
Statutory combined ratio
99.9
%
106.8
98.8
%
102.6
Investments:
Net investment income
36,774
34,003
72,308
66,873
Net realized investment gains
4,539
5,154
11,757
8,509
Total investment income, before federal income tax
41,313
39,157
84,065
75,382
Tax on investment income
10,941
10,107
22,516
19,312
Total investment income, after federal income tax
30,372
29,050
61,549
56,070
Reconciliation of Segment Results to Income from Continuing Operations,
before Federal Income Tax
Quarter ended June 30,
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in thousands)
2014
2013
2014
2013
Standard Insurance Operations underwriting gain, before federal income tax
$
10,121
6,768
$
4,131
18,843
E&S Insurance Operations underwriting (loss) gain, before federal income tax
(37
)
(2,285
)
938
(2,199
)
Investment income, before federal income tax
41,313
39,157
84,065
75,382
Total all segments
51,397
43,640
89,134
92,026
Interest expense
(5,425
)
(5,570
)
(10,986
)
(11,401
)
General corporate and other expenses
(6,451
)
(1,869
)
(13,543
)
(15,556
)
Income from continuing operations, before federal income tax
$
39,521
36,201
$
64,605
65,069
NOTE 9. Retirement Plans
The following table shows the net periodic benefit cost related to the Retirement Income Plan for Selective Insurance Company of America (“Retirement Income Plan”) and the life insurance benefits provided to eligible Selective Insurance Company of America retirees (referred to as the "Retirement Life Plan"). For more information concerning these plans, refer to Note 15. “Retirement Plans” in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” of our 2013 Annual Report.
Retirement Income Plan
Quarter ended June 30,
Retirement Life Plan
Quarter ended June 30,
($ in thousands)
2014
2013
2014
2013
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost:
Net Periodic Benefit Cost:
Service cost
$
1,626
1,857
—
—
Interest cost
3,253
3,051
73
69
Expected return on plan assets
(3,918
)
(3,985
)
—
—
Amortization of unrecognized net actuarial loss
368
772
13
17
Total net periodic cost
$
1,329
1,695
86
86
21
Table of Contents
Retirement Income Plan
Six Months ended June 30,
Retirement Life Plan
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in thousands)
2014
2013
2014
2013
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost:
Net Periodic Benefit Cost:
Service cost
$
3,253
4,306
—
—
Interest cost
6,507
6,354
146
139
Expected return on plan assets
(7,837
)
(7,833
)
—
—
Amortization of unrecognized prior service
—
10
—
—
Amortization of unrecognized net actuarial loss
735
2,594
26
35
Curtailment expense
—
16
—
—
Total net periodic cost
$
2,658
5,447
172
174
Retirement Income Plan
Six Months ended June 30,
Retirement Life Plan
Six Months ended June 30,
2014
2013
2014
2013
Weighted-Average Expense Assumptions:
Discount rate
5.16
%
4.66
4.85
%
4.42
Expected return on plan assets
6.92
7.40
—
—
Rate of compensation increase
4.00
4.00
—
—
We presently anticipate contributing
$9.8 million
to the Retirement Income Plan in 2014,
$5.4 million
of which has been funded as of
June 30, 2014
.
NOTE 10. Comprehensive Income
The components of comprehensive income, both gross and net of tax, for
Second Quarter
and
Six Months 2014
and
2013
are as follows:
Second Quarter 2014
($ in thousands)
Gross
Tax
Net
Net income
$
39,521
10,180
29,341
Components of OCI:
Unrealized gains on investment securities
:
Unrealized holding gains during the period
45,122
15,793
29,329
Amounts reclassified into net income:
HTM securities
(221
)
(77
)
(144
)
Non-credit OTTI
469
164
305
Realized gains on AFS securities
(5,008
)
(1,753
)
(3,255
)
Net unrealized gains
40,362
14,127
26,235
Defined benefit pension and post-retirement plans:
Amounts reclassified into net income:
Net actuarial loss
381
133
248
Defined benefit pension and post-retirement plans
381
133
248
Other comprehensive income
40,743
14,260
26,483
Comprehensive income
$
80,264
24,440
55,824
22
Table of Contents
Second Quarter 2013
($ in thousands)
Gross
Tax
Net
Net income
$
36,201
9,079
27,122
Components of OCI:
Unrealized losses on investment securities
:
Unrealized holding losses during the period
(91,314
)
(31,961
)
(59,353
)
Non-credit OTTI recognized in OCI
47
16
31
Amounts reclassified into net income:
HTM securities
(614
)
(215
)
(399
)
Non-credit OTTI
6
3
3
Realized gains on AFS securities
(5,288
)
(1,850
)
(3,438
)
Net unrealized losses
(97,163
)
(34,007
)
(63,156
)
Defined benefit pension and post-retirement plans:
Amounts reclassified into net income:
Net actuarial loss
789
276
513
Defined benefit pension and post-retirement plans
789
276
513
Other comprehensive loss
(96,374
)
(33,731
)
(62,643
)
Comprehensive loss
$
(60,173
)
(24,652
)
(35,521
)
Six Months 2014
($ in thousands)
Gross
Tax
Net
Net income
$
64,605
17,290
47,315
Components of OCI:
Unrealized gains on investment securities
:
Unrealized holding gains during the period
78,086
27,331
50,755
Amounts reclassified into net income:
HTM securities
(677
)
(237
)
(440
)
Non-credit OTTI
469
164
305
Realized gains on AFS securities
(12,237
)
(4,283
)
(7,954
)
Net unrealized gains
65,641
22,975
42,666
Defined benefit pension and post-retirement plans:
Amounts reclassified into net income:
Net actuarial loss
761
266
495
Defined benefit pension and post-retirement plans
761
266
495
Other comprehensive income
66,402
23,241
43,161
Comprehensive income
$
131,007
40,531
90,476
23
Table of Contents
Six Months 2013
($ in thousands)
Gross
Tax
Net
Net income
$
63,534
15,104
48,430
Components of OCI:
Unrealized losses on investment securities
:
Unrealized holding losses during the period
(87,630
)
(30,671
)
(56,959
)
Non-credit OTTI recognized in OCI
77
27
50
Amounts reclassified into net income:
HTM securities
(1,331
)
(466
)
(865
)
Non-credit OTTI
13
5
8
Realized gains on AFS securities
(11,264
)
(3,942
)
(7,322
)
Net unrealized losses
(100,135
)
(35,047
)
(65,088
)
Defined benefit pension and post-retirement plans:
Net actuarial gains
44,000
15,400
28,600
Amounts reclassified into net income:
Net actuarial loss
2,629
920
1,709
Prior service cost
10
4
6
Curtailment expense
16
5
11
Defined benefit pension and post-retirement plans
46,655
16,329
30,326
Other comprehensive loss
(53,480
)
(18,718
)
(34,762
)
Comprehensive income
$
10,054
(3,614
)
13,668
The balances of, and changes in, each component of AOCI (net of taxes) as of
June 30, 2014
are as follows:
June 30, 2014
Net Unrealized (Loss) Gain on Investment Securities
($ in thousands)
OTTI
Related
HTM
Related
All
Other
Investments
Subtotal
Defined Benefit
Pension and Post-Retirement Plans
Total AOCI
Balance, December 31, 2013
$
(1,599
)
1,467
51,635
51,503
(26,652
)
24,851
OCI before reclassifications
—
—
50,755
50,755
—
50,755
Amounts reclassified from AOCI
305
(440
)
(7,954
)
(8,089
)
495
(7,594
)
Net current period OCI
305
(440
)
42,801
42,666
495
43,161
Balance, June 30, 2014
$
(1,294
)
1,027
94,436
94,169
(26,157
)
68,012
24
Table of Contents
The reclassifications out of AOCI are as follows:
Quarter ended June 30,
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in thousands)
2014
2013
2014
2013
Affected Line Item in the Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Income
OTTI related
Amortization of non-credit OTTI losses on HTM securities
—
6
—
13
Net investment income earned
Realized loss on disposal of non-credit OTTI securities
469
—
469
—
Net realized gains
469
6
469
13
Income from continuing operations, before federal income tax
(164
)
(3
)
(164
)
(5
)
Total federal income tax expense
305
3
305
8
Net income
HTM related
Unrealized losses (gains) on HTM disposals
51
(70
)
75
(151
)
Net realized gains
Amortization of net unrealized gains on HTM securities
(272
)
(544
)
(752
)
(1,180
)
Net investment income earned
(221
)
(614
)
(677
)
(1,331
)
Income from continuing operations, before federal income tax
77
215
237
466
Total federal income tax expense
(144
)
(399
)
(440
)
(865
)
Net income
Realized gains and losses on AFS and OTTI
Realized gains on AFS disposals and OTTI
(5,008
)
(5,288
)
(12,237
)
(11,264
)
Net realized gains
(5,008
)
(5,288
)
(12,237
)
(11,264
)
Income from continuing operations, before federal income tax
1,753
1,850
4,283
3,942
Total federal income tax expense
(3,255
)
(3,438
)
(7,954
)
(7,322
)
Net income
Defined benefit pension and post-retirement life plans
Net actuarial loss
88
158
175
558
Loss and loss expense incurred
293
631
586
2,071
Policy acquisition costs
381
789
761
2,629
Income from continuing operations, before federal income tax
Prior service cost
—
—
—
7
Loss and loss adjustment expenses
—
—
—
3
Policy acquisition costs
—
—
—
10
Income from continuing operations, before federal income tax
Curtailment expense
—
—
—
16
Policy acquisition costs
—
—
—
16
Income from continuing operations, before federal income tax
Total defined benefit pension and post-retirement life
381
789
761
2,655
Income from continuing operations, before federal income tax
(133
)
(276
)
(266
)
(929
)
Total federal income tax expense
248
513
495
1,726
Net income
Total reclassifications for the period
(2,846
)
(3,321
)
(7,594
)
(6,453
)
Net income
25
Table of Contents
Note 11. Litigation
In the ordinary course of conducting business, we are named as defendants in various legal proceedings. Most of these proceedings are claims litigation involving our Insurance Subsidiaries as either: (i) liability insurers defending or providing indemnity for third-party claims brought against insureds; or (ii) insurers defending first-party coverage claims brought against them. We account for such activity through the establishment of unpaid loss and loss expense reserves. We expect that the ultimate liability, if any, with respect to such ordinary course claims litigation, after consideration of provisions made for potential losses and costs of defense, will not be material to our consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
Our Insurance Subsidiaries are also from time to time involved in other legal actions, some of which assert claims for substantial amounts. These actions include, among others, putative class actions seeking certification of a state or national class. Such putative class actions have alleged, for example, improper reimbursement of medical providers paid under workers compensation and personal and commercial automobile insurance policies. Our Insurance Subsidiaries also are involved from time to time in individual actions in which extra-contractual damages, punitive damages, or penalties are sought, such as claims alleging bad faith in the handling of insurance claims. We believe that we have valid defenses to these cases. We expect that the ultimate liability, if any, with respect to such lawsuits, after consideration of provisions made for estimated losses, will not be material to our consolidated financial condition. Nonetheless, given the large or indeterminate amounts sought in certain of these actions, and the inherent unpredictability of litigation, an adverse outcome in certain matters could, from time to time, have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations or cash flows in particular quarterly or annual periods.
26
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
Forward-Looking Statements
In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we discuss and make statements regarding our intentions, beliefs, current expectations, and projections regarding our company’s future operations and performance. Such statements are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are often identified by words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “will,” “should,” and “intends” and their negatives. We caution prospective investors that such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. Risks and uncertainties are inherent in our future performance. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those discussed under Item 1A. “Risk Factors” below in Part II “Other Information.” These risk factors may not be exhaustive. We operate in a continually changing business environment and new risk factors emerge from time to time. We can neither predict such new risk factors nor can we assess the impact, if any, of such new risk factors on our businesses or the extent to which any factor or combination of factors may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements in this report. In light of these risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this report might not occur. We make forward-looking statements based on currently available information and assume no obligation to update these statements due to changes in underlying factors, new information, future developments, or otherwise.
Introduction
We classify our business into three operating segments:
•
Our Standard Insurance Operations segment, which is comprised of both commercial lines ("Commercial Lines") and personal lines ("Personal Lines") business, sells property and casualty insurance products and services in the standard market, including flood insurance through the National Flood Insurance Program's ("NFIPs") write-your-own ("WYO") program;
•
Our Excess and Surplus ("E&S") Insurance Operations segment sells Commercial Lines property and casualty insurance products and services to insureds who have not obtained coverage in the standard market; and
•
Our Investments segment, which invests the premiums collected by our Standard and E&S Insurance Operations and amounts generated through our capital management strategies, which may include the issuance of debt and equity securities.
Our Standard Insurance Operations products and services are sold through nine subsidiaries that write Commercial Lines and Personal Lines business, some of which write flood business through the NFIP's WYO program.
Our E&S Insurance Operations products and services are sold through one subsidiary. This subsidiary, Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company ("MUSIC"), provides us with a nationally-authorized non-admitted platform to write commercial and personal E&S lines business.
Our ten insurance subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the "Insurance Subsidiaries."
The purpose of Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) is to provide an understanding of the consolidated results of operations and financial condition and known trends and uncertainties that may have a material impact in future periods. Consequently, investors should read the MD&A in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements in our 2013 Annual Report filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").
In the MD&A, we will discuss and analyze the following:
•
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates;
•
Financial Highlights of Results for
Second Quarter
and
Six Months 2014
and
Second Quarter
and
Six Months 2013
;
•
Results of Operations and Related Information by Segment;
•
Federal Income Taxes;
•
Financial Condition, Liquidity, Short-term Borrowings, and Capital Resources;
•
Ratings;
•
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements; and
•
Contractual Obligations, Contingent Liabilities, and Commitments.
27
Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements include amounts based on our informed estimates and judgments for those transactions that are not yet complete. Such estimates and judgments affect the reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements. Those estimates and judgments most critical to the preparation of the consolidated financial statements involve the following: (i) reserves for loss and loss expenses; (ii) pension and post-retirement benefit plan actuarial assumptions; (iii) other-than-temporary investment impairments ("OTTI"); and (iv) reinsurance. These estimates and judgments require the use of assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain and, therefore, are subject to change as facts and circumstances develop. If different estimates and judgments had been applied, materially different amounts might have been reported in the financial statements. For additional information regarding our critical accounting policies, refer to our
2013 Annual Report
, pages 44 through 52.
Financial Highlights of Results for
Second Quarter
and Six Months 2014 and
Second Quarter
and Six Months 2013
1
Quarter ended June 30,
Six Months ended June 30,
($ and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
2014
2013
Change
% or Points
2014
2013
Change
% or Points
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP") measures:
Revenues
$
506,849
468,945
8
%
$
1,015,920
928,894
9
%
Pre-tax net investment income
36,774
34,003
8
72,308
66,873
8
Pre-tax net income
39,521
36,201
9
64,605
63,534
2
Net income
29,341
27,122
8
47,315
48,430
(2
)
Diluted net income per share
0.51
0.48
6
0.83
0.86
(3
)
Diluted weighted-average outstanding shares
57,260
56,616
1
57,215
56,530
1
GAAP combined ratio
97.8
%
98.9
(1.1
)
pts
99.4
98.0
1.4
pts
Statutory combined ratio
2
97.5
%
97.7
(0.2
)
99.2
97.3
1.9
Return on average equity
9.7
%
9.7
—
7.9
8.8
(0.9
)
Non-GAAP measures:
Operating income
3
$
26,390
23,773
11
%
$
39,673
43,897
(10
)
%
Diluted operating income per share
3
0.46
0.42
10
0.70
0.78
(10
)
Operating return on average equity
3
8.7
%
8.5
0.2
pts
6.6
8.0
(1.4
)
pts
1
Refer to the Glossary of Terms attached to our
2013 Annual Report
as Exhibit 99.1 for definitions of terms used in this Form 10-Q.
2
The statutory combined ratio for Six Months 2013 included 0.7 points related to the Retirement Income Plan amendments that curtailed the accrual of additional benefits for all eligible employees participating in the plans after March 31, 2016.
3
Operating income is used as an important financial measure by us, analysts, and investors, because the realization of investment gains and losses on sales in any given period is largely discretionary as to timing. In addition, these realized investment gains and losses, as well as OTTI that are charged to earnings and the results of discontinued operations, could distort the analysis of trends. See below for a reconciliation of operating income to net income in accordance with GAAP. Operating return on average equity is calculated by dividing annualized operating income by average stockholders’ equity.
The following table reconciles operating income and net income for the periods presented above:
Quarter ended June 30,
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
2014
2013
2014
2013
Operating income
$
26,390
23,773
39,673
43,897
Net realized gains, net of tax
2,951
3,349
7,642
5,530
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax
—
—
—
(997
)
Net income
$
29,341
27,122
47,315
48,430
Diluted operating income per share
$
0.46
0.42
0.70
0.78
Diluted net realized gains per share
0.05
0.06
0.13
0.10
Diluted net loss from disposal of discontinued operations per share
—
—
—
(0.02
)
Diluted net income per share
$
0.51
0.48
0.83
0.86
28
Table of Contents
Over the long term, we target a return on average equity that is three points higher than our cost of capital, or 12%, excluding the impact of realized gains and losses, which is referred to as operating return on average equity. Our operating return on average equity and contribution by component for Second Quarter 2014 and Six Months 2014 and the comparable prior year periods are as follows:
Operating Return on Average Equity
Quarter ended June 30,
Six Months ended June 30,
2014
2013
2014
2013
Standard Insurance Operations
2.2
%
1.6
%
0.4
%
2.2
%
E&S Insurance Operations
—
%
(0.6
)%
0.1
%
(0.2
)%
Investments
9.1
%
9.2
%
9.0
%
9.2
%
Other
(2.6
)%
(1.7
)%
(2.9
)%
(3.2
)%
Total
8.7
%
8.5
%
6.6
%
8.0
%
Our operating return on average equity in
Second Quarter 2014
and
Six Months 2014
reflects GAAP combined ratios of 97.8% and 99.4%, compared to 98.9% and 98.0% in the same periods a year ago. Increased favorable prior year casualty reserve development and the impact of renewal pure price increases drove the improvement in operating return on average equity in the quarter, despite increased levels of catastrophe and non-catastrophe property losses. On a year-to-date basis, the increase in property losses resulted in an increase in the combined ratio and a corresponding decline in operating return on average equity compared to
Six Months 2013
. Further descriptions of the variances for the quarter and year-to-date periods are as follows:
•
Catastrophe losses for Second Quarter 2014 and Six Months 2014 were $27.2 million, or 5.9 points, and $61.6 million, or 6.7 points, respectively, compared to $19.6 million, or 4.6 points, and $21.2 million, or 2.5 points, in the respective prior year periods. The majority of these catastrophe losses were attributed to extreme weather events in the first quarter of 2014, which brought freezing temperatures and snowstorms to our 22-state standard lines footprint, coupled with hail, tornadoes, and wind events in Second Quarter 2014.
•
Non-catastrophe property losses in Second Quarter 2014 and Six Months 2014 were at some of the highest levels that we have experienced in recent years. The impact varied by line but, for both standard lines and E&S, non-catastrophe property losses for Second Quarter 2014 and Six Months 2014 were approximately $73.0 million, or 15.7 points, and $164.4 million, or 17.9 points, respectively. Non-catastrophe losses for the quarter and year-to-date periods were both about 4 points higher than the same periods last year. These non-catastrophe property losses were primarily the result of fires, roof collapses, and water damage, which were often related to the weather events experienced throughout our footprint states in both Second Quarter 2014 and Six Months 2014.
•
Renewal pure price increases of 7.6% were achieved in full-year 2013, which are currently earning in at 6.9% in Second Quarter 2014 and 7.1% in Six Months 2014. This earned rate is above the loss cost trend of approximately 3%. After taking into account the incremental expenses associated with the additional premium, the net benefit to the combined ratio is approximately 2.5 points for both periods.
•
Favorable prior year casualty development in Second Quarter 2014 and Six Months 2014 was $17.5 million, or 3.8 points, and $31.5 million, or 3.5 points, respectively, compared to favorable prior year casualty development of $2 million, or 0.5 points, and $4 million, or 0.4 points, in Second Quarter 2013 and Six Months 2013, respectively. We experienced stable workers compensation trends in the quarter and year-to-date periods, with no development either favorable or unfavorable. The level of releases in Second Quarter and Six Months 2014 were driven by improving claim trends within our general liability line of business for the 2012 and prior accident years.
Also contributing to Six Months 2014 Insurance Operations results, was the March 2014 sale of the renewal rights to our self-insured group, or "SIG," book of pooled public entity business, which contributed $8 million to other income, reducing the combined ratio by 0.9 points. Although we did not solicit buyers, we decided to sell this very small and specialized book of business when the opportunity presented itself because it had significant production outside of our standard lines footprint, and proved difficult to grow. We, however, have retained our substantial individual risk public entity book of business and we will continue to look for opportunities to grow it.
The remaining fluctuation in our Second Quarter 2014 operating return on average equity compared to Second Quarter 2013 was driven by higher long-term employee compensation expense associated with our performance relative to our peer group and fluctuations in our stock price. This item is captured within the "Other" component in the table above.
29
Table of Contents
The following table provides a quantitative foundation for analyzing our overall Insurance Subsidiaries' underwriting results:
All Lines
Quarter ended June 30,
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in thousands)
2014
2013
Change % or Points
2014
2013
Change % or Points
GAAP Insurance Operations Results:
Net premiums written ("NPW")
$
479,823
462,177
4
%
$
956,573
912,301
5
%
Net premiums earned (“NPE”)
463,625
426,252
9
920,120
847,192
9
Less:
Loss and loss expense incurred
297,795
279,594
7
618,341
549,443
13
Net underwriting expenses incurred
154,197
141,194
9
293,923
279,038
5
Dividends to policyholders
1,549
981
58
2,787
2,067
35
Underwriting gain
$
10,084
4,483
125
%
$
5,069
16,644
(70
)
%
GAAP Ratios:
Loss and loss expense ratio
64.2
%
65.6
(1.4
)
pts
67.2
%
64.9
2.3
pts
Underwriting expense ratio
33.3
33.1
0.2
31.9
32.9
(1.0
)
Dividends to policyholders ratio
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.1
Combined ratio
97.8
98.9
(1.1
)
99.4
98.0
1.4
Statutory Ratios:
Loss and loss expense ratio
1
64.2
65.6
(1.4
)
67.2
64.9
2.3
Underwriting expense ratio
1
33.0
31.9
1.1
31.7
32.2
(0.5
)
Dividends to policyholders ratio
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.1
Combined ratio
1
97.5
%
97.7
(0.2
)
pts
99.2
%
97.3
1.9
pts
1
Statutory ratios for Six Months 2013 included 0.2 points in the loss and loss expense ratio, 0.5 points in the underwriting ratio, and 0.7 points in the combined ratio related to the Retirement Income Plan amendments that curtailed the accrual of additional benefits for all eligible employees participating in the plans after March 31, 2016.
The growth in NPW for our Insurance Subsidiaries in Second Quarter and Six Months 2014 compared to Second Quarter and Six Months 2013 was primarily driven by renewal pure price increases and strong retention in our Standard Commercial Lines Insurance Operations.
NPE increases in Second Quarter 2014 and Six Months 2014 were consistent with the fluctuations in NPW for the twelve-month period ended June 30, 2014 compared to the twelve-month period ended June 30, 2013.
The combined ratios for both Second Quarter 2014 and Six Months 2014 were primarily driven by property results, renewal pure price increases, and favorable prior year casualty development, as discussed above.
Outlook
In their 2013 year-end review, dated February 4, 2014, A.M. Best and Company ("A.M. Best") projected an industry combined ratio of 99.4% for 2014. Their report cited: "In looking ahead to 2014, A.M. Best expects premiums to continue growing through price increases, but the pace of these rate changes are expected to slow and temper growth in premium." They expect that underwriting results should improve slightly on the rate level achieved in recent years, although less favorable development of prior years’ loss reserves is anticipated. In addition, a more normal level of catastrophe losses could increase combined ratios by almost 200 basis points, and the industry will continue to be challenged by the relatively low investment yields that are expected to persist through 2014, as well as the slow recovery from the recession of 2007 through 2009.
Although A.M. Best is continuing to maintain its negative outlook for the commercial lines market reflecting "the uncertainty around loss-reserve development and continued low profit margins driven by low investment yields," it anticipates a 99.9% statutory combined ratio for 2014, driven by: (i) a more normal level of catastrophe losses; (ii) less favorable loss-reserve development; and (iii) loss trends that are partially offset by lower pricing. For personal lines, A.M. Best maintains a stable outlook in the coming year reflecting ongoing stability of the auto line and successful carriers continuing to enhance the granularity of their home pricing models.
30
Table of Contents
In its financial review issued on July 14, 2014, A.M. Best noted that increased catastrophe and weather-related claims led to an increase in losses for the U.S. property and casualty industry in the first quarter of 2014, causing underwriting and net income to decline compared with last year’s results. Losses related to the polar vortex account for much of this increase. Overall, catastrophe losses accounted for 3.4 points on the combined ratio, a substantial increase over the 2.1-point impact in the first quarter of last year. Despite these increased losses, the industry posted another quarter of profitable underwriting, producing a combined ratio of 96.4% for the first quarter of 2014, up from 92.7% for the first quarter of 2013.
In early 2012, we laid out a three-year plan to achieve overall annual renewal pure price increases of 5% to 8%. We achieved 6.0% in Six Months 2014, including 6.1% in our Standard Commercial Lines, 6.2% in our Standard Personal Lines, and 3.7% in our E&S Lines. The 7.6% overall renewal pure price increase in 2013 translated into earned price increases of 7.1% in Six Months 2014, which is above loss cost trends of approximately 3%. The 6% overall renewal pure price increase that we expect to achieve in 2014 is also above loss cost trends, and will continue to add to profitability in 2015.
Our Insurance Subsidiaries reported statutory combined ratios, excluding catastrophes, of 91.6% for Second Quarter 2014 and 92.5% for Six Months 2014, which are in line with our stated full-year 2014 goal of 92%. The catastrophe losses in Second Quarter 2014 of $27 million added 5.9 points to our statutory combined ratio, and the catastrophe losses in Six Months 2014 of $61.6 million added 6.7 points to our statutory combined ratio. This increased level of catastrophe losses was related to extreme winter weather in the first quarter of 2014 and Midwest storms in Second Quarter 2014.
The yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury Notes fell by 50 basis points in Six Months 2014, but as the overall portfolio yield approaches the yield of new purchases, we have begun to see a declining rate of pressure on the yield of the existing portfolio. The continued low interest rate environment has several significant impacts on our business, some of which are beneficial and some of which present a challenge to us. The benefits include lower inflation rates that suppress loss trends, as well as reduce our cost of capital. However, the interest rate environment presents a significant challenge in generating after-tax return on our investment portfolio.
Given the results we have achieved in Six Months 2014, including the level of catastrophe losses we have incurred and the overall renewal pure price increases we have achieved, we currently expect to generate:
•
A full-year combined ratio of 92% excluding catastrophe losses and assuming no additional prior year casualty reserve development;
•
Five points of catastrophe losses for the year, which is one point higher than our previous guidance;
•
Renewal pure price increases of approximately 6% on an overall company basis, at the low end of our previous estimate of 6%-7%;
•
After-tax investment income of approximately $100 million; and
•
Weighted-average shares of approximately 57.4 million.
31
Table of Contents
Results of Operations and Related Information by Segment
Insurance Operations
Standard Insurance Operations
Our Standard Insurance Operations segment, which represents 93% of our combined insurance operations NPW, sells insurance products and services primarily in 22 states in the Eastern and Midwestern U.S. and the District of Columbia, through approximately 1,100 independent retail insurance agencies. This segment consists of two components: (i) Commercial Lines, which markets primarily to businesses and represents approximately 83% of the segment's NPW; and (ii) Personal Lines, including our flood business, which markets primarily to individuals and represents approximately 17% of the segment's NPW.
Quarter ended June 30,
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in thousands)
2014
2013
Change
% or
Points
2014
2013
Change
% or
Points
GAAP Insurance Operations Results:
NPW
$
442,041
429,511
3
%
$
888,729
851,255
4
%
NPE
429,051
396,205
8
853,310
787,086
8
Less:
Loss and loss expense incurred
275,395
258,520
7
576,061
509,251
13
Net underwriting expenses incurred
141,986
129,936
9
270,331
256,925
5
Dividends to policyholders
1,549
981
58
2,787
2,067
35
Underwriting gain
$
10,121
6,768
50
%
$
4,131
18,843
(78
)
%
GAAP Ratios:
Loss and loss expense ratio
64.2
%
65.2
(1.0
)
pts
67.5
%
64.7
2.8
pts
Underwriting expense ratio
33.0
32.9
0.1
31.7
32.6
(0.9
)
Dividends to policyholders ratio
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
—
Combined ratio
97.6
98.3
(0.7
)
99.5
97.6
1.9
Statutory Ratios:
Loss and loss expense ratio
1
64.2
65.3
(1.1
)
67.5
64.7
2.8
Underwriting expense ratio
1
32.7
31.5
1.2
31.4
31.9
(0.5
)
Dividends to policyholders ratio
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
—
Combined ratio
1
97.3
%
97.0
0.3
pts
99.2
%
96.9
2.3
pts
1
Statutory ratios for Six Months 2013 included 0.2 points in the loss and loss expense ratio, 0.5 points in the underwriting ratio, and 0.7 points in the combined ratio related to the Retirement Income Plan amendments that curtailed the accrual of additional benefits for all eligible employees participating in the plans after March 31, 2016.
The improvements in NPW in Second Quarter and Six Months 2014 compared to Second Quarter and Six Months 2013 include the following:
Quarter ended June 30, 2014
Quarter ended June 30, 2013
($ in millions)
Renewal Pure Price Increase
Retention
Renewal Pure Price Increase
Retention
Standard Commercial Lines
5.9
%
82
%
7.2
%
83
%
Standard Personal Lines
6.5
82
8.3
87
Six Months ended June 30, 2014
Six Months ended June 30, 2013
($ in millions)
Renewal Pure Price Increase
Retention
Renewal Pure Price Increase
Retention
Standard Commercial Lines
6.1
%
82
%
7.3
%
82
%
Standard Personal Lines
6.2
82
8.4
86
32
Table of Contents
The decrease in the Standard Personal Lines retention was driven by targeted actions that we have taken to reduce our exposure to certain coverages that have historically been less profitable for us. Excluding the impact of these targeted actions, retention remains strong and comparable to last year.
NPE increases in Second Quarter and Six Months 2014 were consistent with the fluctuations in NPW for the twelve-month period ended
June 30, 2014
compared to the twelve-month period ended
June 30, 2013
.
The GAAP loss and loss expense ratio decreased 1.0 points in
Second Quarter 2014
compared to Second Quarter 2013 driven by: (i) renewal pure price increases that exceed our projected loss cost trends; and (ii) favorable prior year casualty reserve development. This was partially offset by higher non-catastrophe property losses and an increased level of catastrophe losses. Quantitative information regarding the property losses and the reserve development is as follows:
Quarter ended June 30, 2014
Quarter ended June 30, 2013
($ in millions)
Loss and Loss Expense Incurred
Impact on
Loss and Loss Expense Ratio
Loss and Loss Expense Incurred
Impact on
Loss and Loss Expense Ratio
Change in Ratio
Catastrophe losses
$
25.5
5.9
pts
$
17.1
4.3
pts
1.6
pts
Non-catastrophe property losses
67.5
15.7
50.2
12.7
3.0
Favorable prior year casualty reserve development
(17.5
)
(4.1
)
(4.0
)
(1.0
)
(3.1
)
The GAAP loss and loss expense ratio increased 2.8 points in Six Months 2014 compared to Six Months 2013 driven by: (i) an increased level of catastrophe losses; and (ii) higher non-catastrophe property losses. This was partially offset by favorable prior year casualty reserve development and renewal pure price increases that exceed our projected loss cost trends. Quantitative information regarding the property losses and the reserve development is as follows:
Six Months ended June 30, 2014
Six Months ended June 30, 2013
($ in millions)
Loss and Loss Expense Incurred
Impact on
Loss and Loss Expense Ratio
Loss and Loss Expense Incurred
Impact on
Loss and Loss Expense Ratio
Change in Ratio
Catastrophe losses
$
59.7
7.0
pts
$
18.3
2.3
pts
4.7
pts
Non-catastrophe property losses
153.7
18.0
110.9
14.1
3.9
Favorable prior year casualty reserve development
(31.5
)
(3.7
)
(6.0
)
(0.8
)
(2.9
)
The breakdown of favorable prior year casualty reserve development in our Standard Insurance Operations by line of business is as follows:
Favorable/(Unfavorable) Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development
Quarter ended June 30,
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in millions)
2014
2013
2014
2013
General liability
$
14.0
5.0
$
25.0
9.0
Commercial automobile
4.0
—
4.0
—
Workers compensation
—
(3.0
)
—
(11.0
)
Businessowners' policies
(2.5
)
3.0
(1.5
)
6.0
Homeowners
—
—
—
2.0
Personal automobile
2.0
(1.0
)
4.0
—
Total favorable prior year casualty reserve development
$
17.5
4.0
$
31.5
6.0
Favorable impact on loss ratio
4.1
pts
1.0
pts
3.7
pts.
0.8
pts.
Favorable prior year casualty reserve development of $17.5 million in Second Quarter 2014 and $31.5 million in Six Months 2014 was primarily driven by improving claim trends for the 2007 through 2012 accident years on our general liability line of business coupled with stable workers compensation trends in 2014. Included in this net favorable prior year casualty reserve development is unfavorable development in the 2009 accident year in our businessowners' policies line of business.
33
Table of Contents
The improvement in the GAAP underwriting expense ratio in Six Months 2014 compared to Six Months 2013 was primarily driven by the income generated from the first quarter 2014 sale of the renewal rights to our SIG book of pooled public entity business for $8 million, or 0.9 points. For additional information regarding the sale, see Note 8. “Segment Information” in Item 1. “Financial Statements.” of this Form 10-Q.
The statutory underwriting expense ratio increased 1.2 points in Second Quarter 2014 compared to Second Quarter 2013 partially due to an increase in commissions to our agents. This increase, which was due to the mix of NPW, coupled with higher supplemental commissions to agents, was recognized immediately on a statutory basis, but was deferred and amortized on a GAAP basis.
Review of Underwriting Results by Line of Business
Standard Commercial Lines
Quarter ended June 30,
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in thousands)
2014
2013
Change
% or
Points
2014
2013
Change
% or
Points
GAAP Insurance Operations Results:
NPW
$
363,860
350,651
4
%
$
743,210
703,840
6
%
NPE
354,507
322,657
10
703,948
640,502
10
Less:
Loss and loss expense incurred
216,532
201,316
8
459,171
404,455
14
Net underwriting expenses incurred
120,723
110,617
9
229,917
218,135
5
Dividends to policyholders
1,549
981
58
2,787
2,067
35
Underwriting gain
$
15,703
9,743
61
%
$
12,073
15,845
(24
)
%
GAAP Ratios:
Loss and loss expense ratio
61.1
%
62.4
(1.3
)
pts
65.2
%
63.1
2.1
pts
Underwriting expense ratio
34.1
34.3
(0.2
)
32.7
34.1
(1.4
)
Dividends to policyholders ratio
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.4
0.3
0.1
Combined ratio
95.6
97.0
(1.4
)
98.3
97.5
0.8
Statutory Ratios:
Loss and loss expense ratio
1
61.1
62.4
(1.3
)
65.2
63.1
2.1
Underwriting expense ratio
1
34.0
32.9
1.1
32.2
33.2
(1.0
)
Dividends to policyholders ratio
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.4
0.3
0.1
Combined ratio
1
95.5
%
95.6
(0.1
)
pts
97.8
%
96.6
1.2
pts
1
Statutory ratios for Six Months 2013 included 0.2 points in the loss and loss expense ratio, 0.5 points in the underwriting ratio, and 0.7 points in the combined ratio related to the Retirement Income Plan amendments that curtailed the accrual of additional benefits for all employees eligible to participate in the plans after March 31, 2016.
The increase in NPW in Second Quarter and Six Months 2014 compared to Second Quarter and Six Months 2013 is primarily the result of the following:
Quarter ended June 30,
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in millions)
2014
2013
2013
2012
Retention
82
%
83
82
%
82
Renewal pure price increases
5.9
7.2
6.1
7.3
NPE increases in Second Quarter and Six Months 2014 were consistent with the fluctuations in NPW for the twelve-month period ended June 30, 2014 compared to the twelve-month period ended June 30, 2013.
34
Table of Contents
The GAAP loss and loss expense ratio decreased 1.3 points in Second Quarter 2014 compared to Second Quarter 2013 driven by: (i) renewal pure price increases that averaged 6.1% in Six Months 2014 and 7.6% in full-year 2013, the earning of which exceeds our projected loss cost trend by approximately 3 points; and (ii) favorable prior year casualty reserve development. These were partially offset by the following: (i) an increased level of catastrophe losses; and (ii) higher non-catastrophe property losses. Quantitative information regarding the property losses and the reserve development is as follows:
Quarter ended June 30, 2014
Quarter ended June 30, 2013
($ in millions)
Losses Incurred
Impact on
Loss Ratio
Losses
Incurred
Impact on
Loss Ratio
Change in Ratio
Catastrophe losses
$
12.8
3.6
pts
$
9.2
2.8
pts
0.8
pts
Non-catastrophe property losses
43.6
12.3
27.9
8.6
3.7
Favorable prior year casualty reserve development
(15.5
)
(4.4
)
(5.0
)
(1.5
)
(2.9
)
The GAAP loss and loss expense ratio increased 2.1 points in Six Months 2014 compared to Six Months 2013 driven by: (i) an increased level of catastrophe losses; and (ii) higher non-catastrophe property losses. These losses were partially offset by the following: (i) renewal pure price increases that averaged 6.1% in Six Months 2014 and 7.6% in full-year 2013, the earning of which exceeds our projected loss cost trend by approximately 3 points; and (ii) favorable prior year casualty reserve development. Quantitative information regarding the property losses and the reserve development are as follows:
Six Months ended June 30, 2014
Six Months ended June 30, 2013
($ in millions)
Losses Incurred
Impact on
Loss Ratio
Losses
Incurred
Impact on
Loss Ratio
Change in Ratio
Catastrophe losses
$
38.7
5.5
pts
$
9.9
1.6
pts
3.9
pts
Non-catastrophe property losses
102.4
14.5
64.8
10.1
4.4
Favorable prior year casualty reserve development
(27.5
)
(3.9
)
(4.5
)
(0.7
)
(3.2
)
The improvement in the GAAP and statutory underwriting expense ratios in Six Months 2014 compared to Six Months 2013 was primarily driven by the income generated from the renewal rights sale of our SIG book of business for $8 million, or 1.1 points, in the first quarter of 2014. For additional information regarding the sale, see Note 8. “Segment Information” in Item 1. “Financial Statements.” of this Form 10-Q.
The statutory underwriting expense ratio increased 1.1 points in Second Quarter 2014 compared to Second Quarter 2013 partially due to an increase in commissions to our agents. This increase was driven by: (i) the mix of NPW, specifically lower workers compensation NPW, which has a lower commission rate than our other lines of business; and (ii) higher supplemental commission to agents. These amounts are recognized immediately on a statutory basis, but are deferred and amortized on a GAAP basis.
The following is a discussion of our most significant standard Commercial Lines of business and their respective statutory results:
General Liability
Quarter ended June 30,
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in thousands)
2014
2013
Change
% or
Points
2014
2013
Change
% or
Points
Statutory NPW
$
118,176
110,232
7
%
$
237,680
219,637
8
%
Direct new business
19,839
20,859
(5
)
39,674
40,640
(2
)
Retention
82
%
82
—
pts
82
%
82
—
pts
Renewal pure price increases
7.2
%
8.7
(1.5
)
7.4
%
8.7
(1.3
)
Statutory NPE
$
111,591
99,766
12
%
$
220,409
197,469
12
%
Statutory combined ratio
80.7
%
94.9
(14.2
)
pts
80.7
%
95.4
(14.7
)
pts
% of total statutory standard Commercial Lines NPW
32
%
31
32
%
31
The growth in NPW and NPE for our general liability business in Second Quarter and Six Months 2014 reflects renewal pure price increases and strong retention.
35
Table of Contents
The statutory combined ratio improvement for Second Quarter and Six Months 2014 was driven by renewal pure price increases of 7.2% and 7.4%, respectively, that continue to outpace loss cost trends on this line as well as the following:
Quarter ended June 30, 2014
Quarter ended June 30, 2013
($ in millions)
(Benefit) Expense
Impact on
Combined Ratio
(Benefit) Expense
Impact on
Combined Ratio
Change
Points
Favorable prior year casualty reserve development
$
(14.0
)
(12.5
)
pts
$
(5.0
)
(5.0
)
pts
(7.5
)
pts
Six Months ended June 30, 2014
Six Months ended June 30, 2013
($ in millions)
(Benefit) Expense
Impact on
Combined Ratio
(Benefit) Expense
Impact on
Combined Ratio
Change
Points
Favorable prior year casualty reserve development
$
(25.0
)
(11.3
)
pts
$
(9.0
)
(4.6
)
pts
(6.7
)
pts
Sale of SIG renewal rights
(2.1
)
(0.9
)
—
—
(0.9
)
Retirement Income Plan curtailment charge
—
—
1.4
0.7
(0.7
)
Favorable prior year casualty reserve development in Second Quarter and Six Months 2014 was driven by improving claim trends for the 2012 and prior accident years; whereas favorable prior year casualty reserve development in Second Quarter 2013 and Six Months 2013 was driven by the 2009 through 2011 accident years.
Commercial Automobile
Quarter ended June 30,
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in thousands)
2014
2013
Change
% or
Points
2014
2013
Change
% or
Points
Statutory NPW
$
87,413
84,254
4
%
$
176,535
166,126
6
%
Direct new business
13,679
16,166
(15
)
28,485
31,070
(8
)
Retention
82
%
82
—
pts
82
%
82
—
pts
Renewal pure price increases
5.8
%
7.0
(1.2
)
6.0
%
7.0
(1.0
)
Statutory NPE
$
83,472
76,706
9
%
$
165,688
151,053
10
%
Statutory combined ratio
93.5
%
95.3
(1.8
)
pts
94.2
%
96.6
(2.4
)
pts
% of total statutory standard Commercial Lines NPW
24
%
24
24
%
24
The growth in NPW and NPE for our commercial automobile business in Second Quarter and Six Months 2014 reflects renewal pure price increases and strong retention.
The statutory combined ratio improvements for Second Quarter 2014 and Six Months 2014 were impacted by the following:
Quarter ended June 30, 2014
Quarter ended June 30, 2013
($ in millions)
(Benefit) Expense
Impact on
Combined Ratio
(Benefit) Expense
Impact on Combined Ratio
Change Points
Catastrophe losses
$
1.4
1.7
pts
$
(0.3
)
(0.4
)
pts
2.1
pts
Favorable prior year casualty reserve development
(4.0
)
(4.8
)
—
—
(4.8
)
Six Months ended June 30, 2014
Six Months ended June 30, 2013
($ in millions)
(Benefit) Expense
Impact on
Combined Ratio
(Benefit) Expense
Impact on Combined Ratio
Change Points
Catastrophe losses
$
1.5
0.9
pts
$
(0.9
)
(0.6
)
pts
1.5
pts
Favorable prior year casualty reserve development
(4.0
)
(2.4
)
—
—
(2.4
)
Sale of SIG renewal rights
(1.5
)
(0.9
)
—
—
(0.9
)
Retirement Income Plan curtailment charge
—
—
1.0
0.6
(0.6
)
36
Table of Contents
Favorable prior year casualty development in Second Quarter 2014 and Six Months 2014 was driven by the 2008 through 2012 accident years, partially offset by unfavorable prior year casualty development in the 2013 accident year.
Workers Compensation
Quarter ended June 30,
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in thousands)
2014
2013
Change
% or
Points
2014
2013
Change
% or
Points
Statutory NPW
$
65,210
68,589
(5
)
%
$
141,181
143,994
(2
)
%
Direct new business
11,069
14,813
(25
)
24,727
28,692
(14
)
Retention
81
%
81
—
pts
81
%
82
(1
)
pts
Renewal pure price increases
5.7
%
7.6
(1.9
)
5.3
%
7.8
(2.5
)
Statutory NPE
$
68,992
64,855
6
%
$
138,405
130,939
6
%
Statutory combined ratio
112.1
%
118.3
(6.2
)
pts
108.8
%
118.6
(9.8
)
pts
% of total statutory standard Commercial Lines NPW
18
%
20
19
%
20
Second Quarter
and
Six Months 2014
NPW decreased compared to
Second Quarter
and
Six Months 2013
due to a decrease in direct new business. In addition, this line is beginning to be impacted by the sale of the SIG book of business in the first quarter of 2014. The reduction in NPW as a result of this sale was 0.6% for Second Quarter 2014 and 0.3% for Six Months 2014. Although not substantial during the current quarter and year-to-date periods, the reduction in NPW will become more significant as the year progresses, with the greatest impact expected in the third quarter, due to the seasonality of these premiums.
NPE increases in
Second Quarter
and
Six Months 2014
were consistent with the fluctuations in NPW for the twelve-month period ended
June 30, 2014
compared to the twelve-month period ended
June 30, 2013
.
While we continue to view workers compensation in the context of an overall account, we remain very focused on improving this competitive line of business through both underwriting and claims initiatives. We achieved renewal pure price increases of 5.7% in
Second Quarter 2014
and 5.3% in
Six Months 2014
. We are applying all the underwriting tools we have to move pricing higher and write the best risks. In addition, we have centralized the handling of lost-time and medical-only workers compensation claims alongside our strategic case management unit to create integration around our core strategy of early identification, escalation, and mitigation of potentially high-risk claims. We have supplemented our claims expertise within our strategic case management unit with the addition of medical specialists, including nurse practioners and a physician consultant.
The improvement in the statutory combined ratio was primarily attributable to the following:
Quarter ended June 30, 2014
Quarter ended June 30, 2013
($ in millions)
(Benefit) Expense
Impact on
Combined Ratio
(Benefit) Expense
Impact on
Combined Ratio
Change
Points
Unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development
$
—
—
pts
$
3.5
5.0
pts
(5.0
)
pts
Six Months ended June 30, 2014
Six Months ended June 30, 2013
($ in millions)
(Benefit) Expense
Impact on
Combined Ratio
(Benefit) Expense
Impact on
Combined Ratio
Change
Points
Unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development
$
—
—
pts
$
10.5
8.1
pts
(8.1
)
pts
Sale of SIG renewal rights
(1.5
)
(1.1
)
—
—
(1.1
)
Retirement Income Plan curtailment charge
—
—
1.2
0.9
(0.9
)
Second Quarter 2013 and Six Months 2013 unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development was primarily driven by development on the 2012 accident year. In addition, Six Months 2013 was also impacted by a single large claim prior to 2003.
37
Table of Contents
Commercial Property
Quarter ended June 30,
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in thousands)
2014
2013
Change
% or
Points
2014
2013
Change
% or
Points
Statutory NPW
$
62,630
59,193
6
%
$
126,726
116,953
8
%
Direct new business
13,271
14,396
(8
)
27,766
28,781
(4
)
Retention
81
%
82
(1
)
pts
81
%
81
—
pts
Renewal pure price increases
4.0
%
5.0
(1.0
)
4.8
%
5.3
(0.5
)
Statutory NPE
$
61,226
54,937
11
%
$
121,412
108,352
12
%
Statutory combined ratio
101.7
%
80.9
20.8
pts
116.4
%
83.7
32.7
pts
% of total statutory standard Commercial Lines NPW
17
%
17
17
%
17
NPW and NPE increased in Second Quarter and Six Months 2014 compared to Second Quarter and Six Months 2013 primarily due to renewal pure price increases and strong retention.
The increase in the statutory combined ratio in Second Quarter and Six Months 2014 compared to the same prior year periods was due to the following:
Quarter ended June 30, 2014
Quarter ended June 30, 2013
($ in millions)
(Benefit) Expense
Impact on
Combined Ratio
(Benefit) Expense
Impact on
Combined Ratio
Change
% or
Points
Catastrophe losses
$
10.1
16.5
pts
$
7.7
14.0
pts
2.5
pts
Non-catastrophe property losses
26.2
42.7
13.3
24.3
18.4
Six Months ended June 30, 2014
Six Months ended June 30, 2013
($ in millions)
(Benefit) Expense
Impact on
Combined Ratio
(Benefit) Expense
Impact on
Combined Ratio
Change
% or
Points
Catastrophe losses
$
29.0
23.9
pts
$
9.5
8.8
pts
15.1
pts
Non-catastrophe property losses
62.6
51.5
34.0
31.3
20.2
Sale of SIG renewal rights
(1.4
)
(1.1
)
—
—
(1.1
)
Retirement Income Plan curtailment charge
—
—
0.8
0.7
(0.7
)
38
Table of Contents
Standard Personal Lines
Quarter ended June 30,
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in thousands)
2014
2013
Change
% or
Points
2014
2013
Change
% or
Points
GAAP Insurance Operations Results:
NPW
$
78,181
78,860
(1
)
%
$
145,519
147,415
(1
)
%
NPE
74,544
73,548
1
149,362
146,584
2
Less:
Loss and loss expense incurred
58,863
57,204
3
116,890
104,796
12
Net underwriting expenses incurred
21,263
19,319
10
40,414
38,790
4
Underwriting (loss) gain
$
(5,582
)
(2,975
)
(88
)
%
$
(7,942
)
2,998
(365
)
%
GAAP Ratios:
Loss and loss expense ratio
79.0
%
77.8
1.2
pts
78.3
%
71.5
6.8
pts
Underwriting expense ratio
28.5
26.2
2.3
27.0
26.5
0.5
Combined ratio
107.5
104.0
3.5
105.3
98.0
7.3
Statutory Ratios:
Loss and loss expense ratio
1
79.0
77.9
1.1
78.3
71.6
6.7
Underwriting expense ratio
1
27.1
25.0
2.1
27.0
26.0
1.0
Combined ratio
1
106.1
%
102.9
3.2
pts
105.3
%
97.6
7.7
pts
1
Statutory ratios for Six Months 2013 included 0.1 points in the loss and loss expense ratio, 0.5 points in the underwriting ratio, and 0.6 points in the combined ratio related to the Retirement Income Plan amendments that curtailed the accrual of additional benefits for all employees eligible to participate in the plans after March 31, 2016.
The decreases in NPW for both the quarter and year-to-date periods were primarily driven by a marginal decrease in new business and lower retention compared to the same periods a year ago. Partially offsetting these decreases were renewal pure price increases. Quantitative information regarding these items is as follows:
Quarter ended June 30,
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in millions)
2014
2013
2014
2013
New Business
$
9.7
10.8
$
17.7
20.8
Retention
82
%
87
82
%
86
Renewal pure price increase
6.5
8.3
6.2
8.4
The decrease in retention was driven by targeted actions that we have taken to reduce our exposure to certain coverages that have historically been less profitable for us. Excluding the impact of these targeted actions, retention remains strong and comparable to last year.
NPE increases in Second Quarter and Six Months 2014 compared to Second Quarter and Six Months 2013, are consistent with the fluctuations in NPW for the twelve-month period ended June 30, 2014 compared to the twelve-month period ended June 30, 2013.
The variance in the loss and loss expense ratios was driven by storms and fires, resulting in: (i) an increased level of catastrophe losses; and (ii) higher non-catastrophe property losses. Partially offsetting these losses were renewal pure price increases of 6.2% for Six Months 2014, and 7.8% for full-year 2013, the earning of which exceeds our projected loss cost trend for the casualty component of our Personal Lines. Quantitative information regarding the property losses are as follows:
39
Table of Contents
Quarter ended June 30, 2014
Quarter ended June 30, 2013
($ in millions)
Loss and Loss Expense Incurred
Impact on
Loss and Loss Expense Ratio
Loss and Loss
Expense
Incurred
Impact on
Loss and Loss Expense Ratio
Change in Ratio
Catastrophe losses
$
12.7
17.1
pts
$
7.9
10.7
pts
6.4
pts
Non-catastrophe property losses
24.0
32.1
22.3
30.3
1.8
Flood claims handling fees
(1.0
)
(1.3
)
(1.3
)
(1.7
)
0.4
(Favorable)/unfavorable prior year casualty development
(2.0
)
(2.7
)
1.0
1.2
(3.9
)
Six Months ended June 30, 2014
Six Months ended June 30, 2013
($ in millions)
Loss and Loss Expense Incurred
Impact on
Loss and Loss Expense Ratio
Loss and Loss
Expense
Incurred
Impact on
Loss and Loss Expense Ratio
Change in Ratio
Catastrophe losses
$
21.0
14.1
pts
$
8.4
5.7
pts
8.4
pts
Non-catastrophe property losses
51.3
34.4
46.1
31.4
3.0
Flood claims handling fees
(1.6
)
(1.0
)
(2.8
)
(1.9
)
0.9
Favorable prior year casualty development
(4.0
)
(2.7
)
(1.5
)
(1.2
)
(1.5
)
Favorable prior year casualty reserve development in Second Quarter 2014 and Six Months 2014 was driven by the 2009 through 2013 accident years on our personal auto line of business. Unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development in Second Quarter 2013 was driven by accident years prior to 2003, whereas favorable prior year casualty reserve development in Six Months 2013 was due to the 2010 and 2011 accident years in our homeowners line of business.
The increase in the GAAP and statutory underwriting expense ratios were driven by higher supplemental commissions to agents. In addition, the statutory underwriting expense ratio had a one-time favorable premium tax ruling on our Flood business of 1.5 points in Second Quarter 2013 and 0.8 points in Six Months 2013.
E&S Insurance Operations
Our E&S Insurance Operations segment, which represents 7% of our combined insurance operations NPW, sells Commercial Lines insurance products and services in all 50 states and the District of Columbia through approximately 85 wholesale general agents. Insurance policies in this segment typically cover business risks with unique characteristics, such as the nature of the business or its claim history, that have not obtained coverage in the standard commercial marketplace. E&S insurers have more flexibility in coverage terms and rates compared to standard market insurers, generally resulting in policies with higher rates, and terms and conditions that are customized for specific risks.
Quarter ended June 30,
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in thousands)
2014
2013
Change
% or
Points
2014
2013
Change
% or
Points
GAAP Insurance Operations Results:
NPW
$
37,782
32,666
16
%
$
67,844
61,046
11
%
NPE
34,574
30,047
15
66,810
60,106
11
Less:
Loss and loss expense incurred
22,400
21,074
6
42,280
40,192
5
Net underwriting expenses incurred
12,211
11,258
8
23,592
22,113
7
Underwriting (loss) gain
$
(37
)
(2,285
)
98
%
$
938
(2,199
)
143
%
GAAP Ratios:
Loss and loss expense ratio
64.8
%
70.1
(5.3
)
pts
63.3
%
66.9
(3.6
)
pts
Underwriting expense ratio
35.3
37.5
(2.2
)
35.3
36.8
(1.5
)
Combined ratio
100.1
107.6
(7.5
)
98.6
103.7
(5.1
)
Statutory Ratios:
Loss and loss expense ratio
65.0
70.3
(5.3
)
63.4
66.9
(3.5
)
Underwriting expense ratio
34.9
36.5
(1.6
)
35.4
35.7
(0.3
)
Combined ratio
99.9
%
106.8
(6.9
)
pts
98.8
%
102.6
(3.8
)
pts
40
Table of Contents
The improvement in the combined ratio in
Second Quarter
and
Six Months 2014
was driven by the following:
•
Significant underwriting actions that we have implemented to improve profitability, including achieving renewal pure price increases of 2.7% in Second Quarter 2014 and 3.7% in Six Months 2014.
•
No prior year casualty reserve development in 2014 compared to unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development of $2.0 million, or 6.5 points, in Second Quarter 2013 and $2.5 million, or 4.1 points, in Six Months 2013.
•
Catastrophe losses of 4.9 points in Second Quarter 2014 compared to 8.5 points in Second Quarter 2013 and 2.8 points in Six Months 2014 compared to 4.8 points in Six Months 2013.
These benefits were partially offset by increased non-catastrophe property losses in Second Quarter 2014 and Six Months 2014 compared to the same periods last year.
Reinsurance: Standard Insurance Operations
Reinsurance Treaties and Arrangement
We have successfully completed negotiations of our July 1, 2014 Standard Insurance Operations excess of loss treaties with
some enhancements in terms and conditions and the same structure as the expiring treaties as follows:
Property Excess of Loss
The property excess of loss treaty ("Property Treaty") continues to provide $38.0 million of coverage in excess of a $2.0 million retention:
•
The per occurrence cap on the total program is $84.0 million.
•
The first layer continues to have unlimited reinstatements. The annual aggregate limit for the $30.0 million in excess of $10.0 million second layer is $120.0 million.
•
The Property Treaty continues to exclude nuclear, biological, chemical, and radiological terrorism losses.
Casualty Excess of Loss
The casualty excess of loss treaty (“Casualty Treaty”) continues to provide $88.0 million of coverage in excess of a $2.0 million retention:
•
The first through sixth layers provide coverage for 100% of up to $88.0 million in excess of a $2.0 million
retention.
•
The Casualty Treaty excludes nuclear, biological, chemical, and radiological terrorism losses, with the annual aggregate terrorism limits increased to $208.0 million from $201.0 million.
41
Table of Contents
Investments
Our investment philosophy includes certain return and risk objectives for the fixed income, equity, and other investment portfolios. Although yield and income generation remain the key drivers to our investment strategy, our overall philosophy is to invest with a long-term horizon along with predominantly a “buy-and-hold” approach. The primary fixed income portfolio return objective is to maximize after-tax investment yield and income while balancing risk. A secondary objective is to meet or exceed a weighted-average benchmark of public fixed income indices. Within the equity portfolio, the high dividend yield strategy is designed to generate consistent dividend income while maintaining an expected tracking error to the S&P 500 Index. Additional equity strategies are focused on meeting or exceeding strategy-specific benchmarks of public equity indices. The return objective of the other investment portfolio, which includes alternative investments, is to meet or exceed the S&P 500 Index.
Total Invested Assets
($ in thousands)
June 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
Change %
Total invested assets
$
4,739,099
4,583,312
3
%
Unrealized gain – before tax
144,877
79,236
83
Unrealized gain – after tax
94,169
51,504
83
The increase in our investment portfolio compared to year-end
2013
was primarily due to: (i) cash flows provided by operating activities of $72.7 million; and (ii) an increase in pre-tax unrealized gains of
$65.6 million
. These gains were driven by increases in the market value of our fixed income securities portfolio as interest rates decreased during
Six Months 2014
.
During
Six Months 2014
, interest rates on the 10-year U.S. Treasury Note fell by 50 basis points. This decline in interest rates increased the unrealized gain position on our fixed income securities portfolio. The average after-tax yield on our purchases of fixed income securities was 2.3% during Second Quarter 2014. The interest rate environment over the past several years has put pressure on the existing investment yield of the portfolio, as new and reinvested money has been redeployed at lower rates. However, as the overall portfolio yield approaches the yield of new purchases, we have begun to see a declining rate of pressure on the yield of the existing portfolio.
We structure our portfolio conservatively with a focus on: (i) asset diversification; (ii) investment quality; (iii) liquidity, particularly to meet the cash obligations of our insurance operations segments; (iv) consideration of taxes; and (v) preservation of capital. We believe that we have a high quality and liquid investment portfolio. The breakdown of our investment portfolio is as follows:
June 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
U.S. government obligations
3
%
4
Foreign government obligations
1
1
State and municipal obligations
30
28
Corporate securities
38
39
Mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”)
15
15
Asset-backed securities (“ABS”)
3
3
Total fixed income securities
90
90
Equity securities
4
4
Short-term investments
4
4
Other investments
2
2
Total
100
%
100
42
Table of Contents
Fixed Income Securities
The average duration of the fixed income securities portfolio as of
June 30, 2014
was
3.6
years, including short-term investments, compared to the Insurance Subsidiaries’ liability duration of approximately
3.8
years. The current duration of the fixed income securities portfolio is within our historical range, and is monitored and managed to maximize yield while managing interest rate risk at an acceptable level. We are experiencing continued pressure on the yields within our fixed income securities portfolio, as higher yielding bonds that are either maturing or have been sold are being replaced with lower yielding bonds that are currently available in the marketplace. We manage liquidity with a laddered maturity structure and an appropriate level of short-term investments to avoid liquidation of available-for-sale ("AFS") fixed income securities in the ordinary course of business. We typically have a long investment time horizon, and every purchase or sale is made with the intent of maximizing risk-adjusted investment returns in the current market environment while balancing capital preservation.
Our fixed income securities portfolio had a weighted average credit rating of “AA-" as of
June 30, 2014
. The following table presents the credit ratings of this portfolio:
Fixed Income Security Rating
June 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
Aaa/AAA
16
%
15
Aa/AA
45
45
A/A
25
26
Baa/BBB
13
13
Ba/BB or below
1
1
Total
100
%
100
43
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the fair value, unrealized gain (loss) balances, and the weighted average credit qualities of our AFS fixed income securities at
June 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
:
June 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
($ in millions)
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
Weighted
Average Credit
Quality
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
Weighted Average Credit Quality
AFS Fixed Income Portfolio:
U.S. government obligations
$
158.8
9.3
AA+
173.4
10.1
AA+
Foreign government obligations
28.0
1.0
AA-
30.6
0.8
AA-
State and municipal obligations
1,107.1
27.0
AA+
951.6
5.2
AA
Corporate securities
1,782.6
52.4
A-
1,734.9
27.0
A
ABS
132.2
0.7
AAA
140.9
0.5
AAA
MBS
681.5
7.8
AA+
684.1
(4.0
)
AA+
Total AFS fixed income portfolio
$
3,890.2
98.2
AA-
3,715.5
39.6
AA-
State and Municipal Obligations:
General obligations
$
528.0
12.4
AA+
472.0
2.6
AA+
Special revenue obligations
579.1
14.6
AA
479.6
2.6
AA
Total state and municipal obligations
$
1,107.1
27.0
AA+
951.6
5.2
AA
Corporate Securities:
Financial
$
550.7
16.1
A
534.1
11.7
A
Industrials
140.6
5.3
A-
135.1
3.7
A-
Utilities
156.4
3.8
BBB+
146.5
(0.3
)
A-
Consumer discretionary
204.9
7.0
A-
190.6
2.7
A-
Consumer staples
171.5
4.8
A
171.9
3.0
A
Healthcare
167.8
5.4
A
168.5
3.1
A
Materials
109.3
3.5
BBB+
101.2
1.4
A-
Energy
108.1
2.8
A-
93.7
0.9
A-
Information technology
116.0
1.8
A+
121.2
(0.6
)
A+
Telecommunications services
50.4
1.5
BBB+
64.7
1.0
BBB+
Other
6.9
0.4
AA+
7.4
0.4
AA+
Total corporate securities
$
1,782.6
52.4
A-
1,734.9
27.0
A
ABS:
ABS
$
131.8
0.7
AAA
140.4
0.4
AAA
Sub-prime ABS
1
0.4
—
D
0.5
0.1
D
Total ABS
132.2
0.7
AAA
140.9
0.5
AAA
MBS:
Government guaranteed agency commercial mortgage-backed securities ("CMBS")
$
23.7
0.6
AA+
30.0
0.9
AA+
Other agency CMBS
10.8
(0.1
)
AA+
9.1
(0.3
)
AA+
Non-agency CMBS
138.0
1.6
AA+
132.2
(1.5
)
AA+
Government guaranteed agency residential MBS ("RMBS")
41.8
1.2
AA+
55.2
1.4
AA+
Other agency RMBS
422.9
3.6
AA+
411.5
(5.1
)
AA+
Non-agency RMBS
40.1
0.8
A-
41.4
0.6
A-
Alternative-A (“Alt-A”) RMBS
4.2
0.1
A
4.7
—
A
Total MBS
$
681.5
7.8
AA+
684.1
(4.0
)
AA+
1
Subprime ABS consists of one security whose issuer is currently expected by rating agencies to default on its obligations. We define sub-prime exposure as exposure to direct and indirect investments in non-agency residential mortgages with average FICO
®
scores below 650.
44
Table of Contents
The following tables provide information regarding our held-to-maturity (“HTM”) fixed income securities and their credit qualities at
June 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
:
June 30, 2014
($ in millions)
Fair
Value
Carry
Value
Unrecognized Holding Gain (Loss)
Unrealized Gain (Loss) in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ("AOCI")
Total Unrealized/ Unrecognized Gain (Loss)
Weighted Average Credit Quality
HTM Fixed Income Portfolio:
Foreign government obligations
$
5.5
5.4
0.1
0.1
0.2
AA+
State and municipal obligations
346.7
330.8
15.9
2.9
18.8
AA
Corporate securities
24.5
21.5
3.0
(0.3
)
2.7
A+
ABS
3.3
2.7
0.6
(0.6
)
—
AAA
MBS
5.5
4.5
1.0
(0.5
)
0.5
AAA
Total HTM fixed income portfolio
$
385.5
364.9
20.6
1.6
22.2
AA
State and Municipal Obligations:
General obligations
$
110.6
105.9
4.7
1.5
6.2
AA
Special revenue obligations
236.1
224.9
11.2
1.4
12.6
AA
Total state and municipal obligations
$
346.7
330.8
15.9
2.9
18.8
AA
Corporate Securities:
Financial
$
2.3
1.9
0.4
(0.1
)
0.3
A-
Industrials
7.0
5.9
1.1
(0.1
)
1.0
A+
Utilities
13.7
12.2
1.5
(0.1
)
1.4
A+
Consumer discretionary
1.5
1.5
—
—
—
AA
Total corporate securities
$
24.5
21.5
3.0
(0.3
)
2.7
A+
ABS:
ABS
$
0.8
0.8
—
—
—
AA
Alt-A ABS
2.5
1.9
0.6
(0.6
)
—
AAA
Total ABS
$
3.3
2.7
0.6
(0.6
)
—
AAA
MBS:
Non-agency CMBS
$
5.5
4.5
1.0
(0.5
)
0.5
AAA
Total MBS
$
5.5
4.5
1.0
(0.5
)
0.5
AAA
45
Table of Contents
December 31, 2013
($ in millions)
Fair
Value
Carry
Value
Unrecognized Holding Gain (Loss)
Unrealized Gain (Loss) in AOCI
Total Unrealized/ Unrecognized Gain (Loss)
Weighted Average Credit Quality
HTM Portfolio:
Foreign government obligations
$
5.6
5.4
0.2
0.1
0.3
AA+
State and municipal obligations
369.8
352.2
17.6
4.0
21.6
AA
Corporate securities
30.3
27.8
2.5
(0.3
)
2.2
A
ABS
3.4
2.8
0.6
(0.6
)
—
AA+
MBS
7.9
4.7
3.2
(0.9
)
2.3
AA-
Total HTM portfolio
$
417.0
392.9
24.1
2.3
26.4
AA
State and Municipal Obligations:
General obligations
$
118.5
113.1
5.4
2.0
7.4
AA
Special revenue obligations
251.3
239.1
12.2
2.0
14.2
AA
Total state and municipal obligations
$
369.8
352.2
17.6
4.0
21.6
AA
Corporate Securities:
Financial
$
7.3
6.8
0.5
(0.1
)
0.4
BBB+
Industrials
7.8
6.8
1.0
(0.2
)
0.8
A+
Utilities
13.2
12.2
1.0
—
1.0
A+
Consumer discretionary
2.0
2.0
—
—
—
AA
Total corporate securities
$
30.3
27.8
2.5
(0.3
)
2.2
A
ABS:
ABS
$
0.9
0.9
—
—
—
A
Alt-A ABS
2.5
1.9
0.6
(0.6
)
—
AAA
Total ABS
$
3.4
2.8
0.6
(0.6
)
—
AA+
MBS:
Non-agency CMBS
$
7.9
4.7
3.2
(0.9
)
2.3
AA-
Total MBS
$
7.9
4.7
3.2
(0.9
)
2.3
AA-
46
Table of Contents
The sector composition and credit quality of our municipal bonds did not significantly change from
December 31, 2013
. For details regarding our special revenue bond sectors and additional information regarding credit risk and our management of MBS exposure, see Item 7A. “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.” of our 2013 Annual Report.
The following table details the top 10 state exposures of the municipal bond portion of our fixed income securities portfolio at
June 30, 2014
:
State Exposures of Municipal Bonds
General Obligation
Special
Revenue
Fair
Value
% of Total
Weighted Average Credit Quality
($ in thousands)
Local
State
New York
$
9,854
—
109,187
119,041
8%
AA+
Texas
1
57,750
5,812
54,741
118,303
8%
AA+
Washington
39,628
6,912
43,399
89,939
6%
AA+
Florida
—
15,479
50,340
65,819
5%
AA
Arizona
8,062
1,003
54,865
63,930
4%
AA
California
8,873
—
40,809
49,682
4%
AA
Colorado
31,723
—
16,712
48,435
3%
AA-
Missouri
16,015
10,138
19,196
45,349
3%
AA+
North Carolina
13,079
8,275
22,998
44,352
3%
AA
Ohio
8,365
19,104
14,927
42,396
3%
AA+
Other
170,146
139,726
319,588
629,460
43%
AA
363,495
206,449
746,762
1,316,706
90%
AA
Pre-refunded/escrowed to maturity bonds
52,757
15,878
68,437
137,072
10%
AA+
Total
$
416,252
222,327
815,199
1,453,778
100%
AA
% of Total Portfolio
29
%
15
%
56
%
100
%
1
Of the
$58 million
in local Texas general obligation bonds,
$28 million
represents investments in Texas Permanent School Fund bonds, which are considered to have lower risk as a result of the bond guarantee program that supports these bonds.
A portion of our municipal bonds contain insurance enhancements. The following table provides information regarding these insurance-enhanced securities as of
June 30, 2014
:
Insurers of Municipal Bond Securities
($ in thousands)
Fair Value
Ratings
with
Insurance
Ratings
without
Insurance
National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation, a subsidiary of MBIA, Inc.
$
185,126
AA-
AA-
Assured Guaranty
138,553
AA
AA-
Ambac Financial Group, Inc.
58,848
AA
AA
Other
10,575
AA
A+
Total
$
393,102
AA
AA-
Equity Securities
Our equity securities portfolio was
4%
of invested assets as of both
June 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
, while the value of this portfolio increased modestly to $211.3 million from $192.8 million over the same time period. During Six Months 2014, we rebalanced our high dividend yield strategy holdings within this portfolio, generating purchases of
$111.8 million
and sales of securities that had an original cost of
$99.6 million
.
47
Table of Contents
Unrealized/Unrecognized Losses
Our net unrealized/unrecognized loss positions improved by
$38.7 million
, to
$13.3 million
, as of
June 30, 2014
compared to
December 31, 2013
. The majority of this improvement was in our fixed income securities portfolio.
The following table presents amortized cost and fair value information for our AFS fixed income securities that were in an unrealized loss position at
June 30, 2014
by contractual maturity:
($ in thousands)
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Unrealized Loss
One year or less
$
393
378
15
Due after one year through five years
256,800
253,974
2,826
Due after five years through ten years
559,252
548,852
10,400
Due after ten years
3,461
3,401
60
Total
$
819,906
806,605
13,301
The following table presents amortized cost and fair value information for our HTM fixed income securities that were in an unrealized/unrecognized loss position at
June 30, 2014
by contractual maturity:
($ in thousands)
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Unrecognized/Unrealized Loss
One year or less
$
1,484
1,482
2
Due after one year through five years
2,515
2,496
19
Total
$
3,999
3,978
21
We have reviewed the securities in the tables above in accordance with our OTTI policy, which is discussed in Note 2. “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” of our
2013 Annual Report
. We have concluded that these securities were temporarily impaired as of
June 30, 2014
and December 31, 2013. For additional information regarding the unrealized/unrecognized losses in our AFS and HTM portfolios, see Note 5. “Investments” in Item 1. “Financial Statements.” of this Form 10-Q.
Other Investments
As of
June 30, 2014
, other investments of $
106.1 million
represented
2%
of our total invested assets. In addition to the capital that we have already invested to date, we are contractually obligated to invest up to an additional
$52.7 million
in our other investments portfolio through commitments that currently expire at various dates through 2026. For a description of our seven alternative investment strategies, as well as redemption, restrictions, and fund liquidations, refer to Note 5. “Investments” in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” of our
2013 Annual Report
.
48
Table of Contents
Net Investment Income
The components of net investment income earned for the indicated periods were as follows:
Quarter ended June 30,
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in thousands)
2014
2013
2014
2013
Fixed income securities
$
33,781
30,298
64,809
60,387
Equity securities
1,736
1,874
3,185
3,081
Short-term investments
14
29
33
81
Other investments
3,553
3,869
8,771
7,471
Investment expenses
(2,310
)
(2,067
)
(4,490
)
(4,147
)
Net investment income earned – before tax
36,774
34,003
72,308
66,873
Net investment income tax expense
(9,353
)
(8,303
)
(18,401
)
(16,334
)
Net investment income earned – after tax
$
27,421
25,700
53,907
50,539
Effective tax rate
25.4
%
24.4
25.4
24.4
Annualized after-tax yield on fixed income securities
2.4
2.3
2.3
2.4
Annualized after-tax yield on investment portfolio
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
Net investment income before tax
increased
in Second Quarter and Six Months 2014 compared to the same periods last year primarily due to higher income from our fixed income securities, driven by an increase in the size of this portfolio, which more than offset the lower yield earned this year compared to last.
Realized Gains and Losses
Our general philosophy for sales of securities is to reduce our exposure to securities and sectors based on economic evaluations and when the fundamentals for that security or sector have deteriorated, or to opportunistically trade out of securities to other securities with better economic return characteristics. We typically have a long investment time horizon, and every purchase or sale is made with the intent of maximizing risk-adjusted investment returns in the current market environment while balancing capital preservation. Total net realized gains amounted to
$4.5 million
in
Second Quarter
2014 and
$11.8 million
in
Six Months 2014
, and
$5.2 million
and
$8.5 million
in the same periods a year ago. These amounts included
$0.4 million
and
$1.4 million
in OTTI charges in
Second Quarter
and
Six Months 2014
, and
$0.6 million
and
$2.5 million
in
Second Quarter
and
Six Months 2013
, respectively.
We regularly review our entire investment portfolio for declines in fair value. If we believe that a decline in the value of a particular investment is other than temporary, we record it as an OTTI, through realized losses in earnings for the credit-related portion and through unrealized losses in other comprehensive income ("OCI") for the non-credit related portion. If there is a decline in fair value of an equity security that we do not intend to hold, or if we determine that the decline is other than temporary, we write down the cost of the investment to fair value and record the charge through earnings as a component of realized losses.
For discussion of our realized gains and losses as well as our OTTI methodology, see Note 2. “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” of our
2013 Annual Report
, and for qualitative information about our OTTI charges, see Note 5. "Investments" in Item 1. "Financial Statements." of this
Form 10-Q.
Federal Income Taxes
The following table provides information regarding federal income taxes from continuing operations:
Quarter ended June 30,
Six Months ended June 30,
($ in million)
2014
2013
2014
2013
Federal income tax expense from continuing operations
$
10.2
9.1
17.3
15.6
Effective tax rate
26
%
25
27
24
Despite lower pre-tax net income in Six Months 2014 compared to Six Months 2013, federal income tax expense, as well as the effective tax rate have increased year over year. This increase is driven by our expectation of relatively higher full-year insurance operations results in 2014. We are required, through accounting rules, to record each quarter’s taxes at the expected annual effective tax rate regardless of the relative magnitude of the individual components within any one quarter.
49
Table of Contents
Financial Condition, Liquidity, Short-term Borrowings, and Capital Resources
Capital resources and liquidity reflect our ability to generate cash flows from business operations, borrow funds at competitive rates, and raise new capital to meet operating and growth needs.
Liquidity
We manage liquidity with a focus on generating sufficient cash flows to meet the short-term and long-term cash requirements of our business operations. Our cash and short-term investment position of $168 million at
June 30, 2014
was comprised of $30.8 million at Selective Insurance Group, Inc. (the "Parent") and $137.2 million at the Insurance Subsidiaries. Short-term investments are generally maintained in "AAA" rated money market funds approved by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners. The Parent continues to maintain a fixed income security investment portfolio containing high-quality, highly-liquid government and corporate fixed income securities to generate additional yield. This portfolio amounted to $60 million at
June 30, 2014
compared to $56 million at December 31, 2013.
Sources of cash for the Parent have historically consisted of dividends from the Insurance Subsidiaries, borrowings under lines of credit and loan agreements with certain Insurance Subsidiaries, and the issuance of stock and debt securities. We continue to monitor these sources, giving consideration to our long-term liquidity and capital preservation strategies.
We currently anticipate the Insurance Subsidiaries will pay approximately $57.5 million in total dividends to the Parent in 2014. Cash dividends of $28.8 million were paid in
Six Months 2014
. As of December 31, 2013, our allowable ordinary maximum dividend was approximately $127 million for 2014.
Any dividends to the Parent are subject to the approval and/or review of the insurance regulators in the respective domiciliary states and are generally payable only from earned surplus as reported in the statutory annual statements of those subsidiaries as of the preceding December 31. Although past dividends have historically been met with regulatory approval, there is no assurance that future dividends that may be declared will be approved. For additional information regarding dividend restrictions, refer to Note 20. “Statutory Financial Information, Capital Requirements, and Restrictions on Dividends and Transfers of Funds” in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” of our 2013 Annual Report.
The Parent had no private or public issuances of stock during
Six Months 2014
and there were no borrowings under its $30 million line of credit ("Line of Credit") at
June 30, 2014
or at any time during
Six Months 2014
.
We have two Insurance Subsidiaries domiciled in Indiana ("Indiana Subsidiaries") that are members of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis ("FHLBI"). These Insurance Subsidiaries are Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina ("SICSC") and Selective Insurance Company of the Southeast ("SICSE"). Membership in the FHLBI provides these subsidiaries with access to additional liquidity. The Indiana Subsidiaries' aggregate investment of $2.9 million provides them with the ability to borrow up to 20 times the total amount of the FHLBI common stock purchased, at comparatively low borrowing rates. All borrowings from the FHLBI are required to be secured by certain investments. For additional information regarding the required collateral, refer to Note 5. "Investments" in Item 1. "Financial Statements." of this Form 10-Q.
The Parent's Line of Credit agreement permits collateralized borrowings by the Indiana Subsidiaries from the FHLBI so long as the aggregate amount borrowed does not exceed 10% of the respective Indiana Subsidiary's admitted assets from the preceding calendar year. Admitted assets amounted to $542.4 million for SICSC and $414.9 million for SICSE as of December 31, 2013, for a borrowing capacity of approximately $96 million. As our outstanding borrowing with the FHLBI is currently $58 million, the Indiana Subsidiaries have the ability to borrow approximately $38 million more until the Line of Credit borrowing limit is met, of which $30 million could be loaned to the Parent under lending agreements approved by the Indiana Department of Insurance. Similar to the Line of Credit agreement, these lending agreements limit borrowings by the Parent from the Indiana Subsidiaries to 10% of the admitted assets of the respective Indiana Subsidiary. For additional information regarding the Parent's Line of Credit, refer to the section below entitled “Short-term Borrowings.”
The Insurance Subsidiaries also generate liquidity through insurance float, which is created by collecting premiums and earning investment income before losses are paid. The period of the float can extend over many years. Our investment portfolio consists of maturity dates that are laddered to continually provide a source of cash flows for claims payments in the ordinary course of business. The duration of the fixed income securities portfolio including short-term investments was 3.6 years as of
June 30, 2014
, while the liabilities of the Insurance Subsidiaries have a duration of 3.8 years. In addition, the Insurance Subsidiaries purchase reinsurance coverage for protection against any significantly large claims or catastrophes that may occur during the year.
50
Table of Contents
The liquidity generated from the sources discussed above is used, among other things, to pay dividends to our shareholders. Dividends on shares of the Parent's common stock are declared and paid at the discretion of the Board of Directors based on our operating results, financial condition, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, and other relevant factors.
Our ability to meet our interest and principal repayment obligations on our debt, as well as our ability to continue to pay dividends to our stockholders, is dependent on liquidity at the Parent coupled with the ability of the Insurance Subsidiaries to pay dividends, if necessary, and/or the availability of other sources of liquidity to the Parent. Upcoming principal payments on our debt include $13 million in December 2014 and $45 million in December 2016. Subsequent to 2016, our next principal repayment is due in 2034. Restrictions on the ability of the Insurance Subsidiaries to declare and pay dividends, without alternative liquidity options, could materially affect our ability to service debt and pay dividends on common stock.
Short-term Borrowings
Our Line of Credit with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, and Branch Banking and Trust Company (BB&T), was renewed effective September 26, 2013 with a borrowing capacity of $30 million, which can be increased to $50 million with the approval of both lending partners.
The Line of Credit provides the Parent with an additional source of short-term liquidity. The interest rate on our Line of Credit varies and is based on, among other factors, the Parent’s debt ratings. The Line of Credit expires on September 26, 2017. There were no balances outstanding under the Line of Credit at June 30, 2014 or at any time during
Six Months 2014
.
The Line of Credit agreement contains representations, warranties, and covenants that are customary for credit facilities of this type, including, without limitation, financial covenants under which we are obligated to maintain a minimum consolidated net worth, minimum combined statutory surplus, and maximum ratio of consolidated debt to total capitalization, as well as covenants limiting our ability to: (i) merge or liquidate; (ii) incur debt or liens; (iii) dispose of assets; (iv) make certain investments and acquisitions; and (v) engage in transactions with affiliates.
The table below outlines information regarding certain of the covenants in the Line of Credit:
Required as of June 30, 2014
Actual as of
June 30, 2014
Consolidated net worth
$830 million
$1.2 billion
Statutory surplus
Not less than $750 million
$1.3 billion
Debt-to-capitalization ratio
1
Not to exceed 35%
24.3%
A.M. Best financial strength rating
A-
A
1
Calculated in accordance with the Line of Credit agreement.
Capital Resources
Capital resources provide protection for policyholders, furnish the financial strength to support the business of underwriting insurance risks, and facilitate continued business growth. At
June 30, 2014
, we had statutory surplus of $1.3 billion, GAAP stockholders’ equity of $1.2 billion, and total debt of $392.3 million, which equates to a debt-to-capital ratio of approximately 24.1%.
Our cash requirements include, but are not limited to, principal and interest payments on various notes payable, dividends to stockholders, payment of claims, payment of commitments under limited partnership agreements and capital expenditures, as well as other operating expenses, which include agents’ commissions, labor costs, premium taxes, general and administrative expenses, and income taxes. For further details regarding our cash requirements, refer to the section below entitled, “Contractual Obligations, Contingent Liabilities, and Commitments.”
We continually monitor our cash requirements and the amount of capital resources that we maintain at the holding company and operating subsidiary levels. As part of our long-term capital strategy, we strive to maintain capital metrics, relative to the macroeconomic environment, that support our targeted financial strength. Based on our analysis and market conditions, we may take a variety of actions, including, but not limited to, contributing capital to the Insurance Subsidiaries in our insurance operations, issuing additional debt and/or equity securities, repurchasing shares of the Parent’s common stock, and increasing stockholders’ dividends.
51
Table of Contents
Our capital management strategy is intended to protect the interests of the policyholders of the Insurance Subsidiaries and our stockholders, while enhancing our financial strength and underwriting capacity.
Book value per share increased to $21.96 as of
June 30, 2014
, from $20.63 as of December 31, 2013, due to $0.84 in net income coupled with a $0.76 increase in unrealized gains on our investment portfolio. These items were partially offset by $0.26 in dividends to our shareholders.
Ratings
We are rated by major rating agencies that issue opinions on our financial strength, operating performance, strategic position, and ability to meet policyholder obligations. We believe that our ability to write insurance business is most influenced by our rating from A.M. Best. In
Second Quarter 2014
, A.M. Best reaffirmed our rating of "A (Excellent)," their third highest of 13 financial strength ratings, with a “stable” outlook. The rating reflects our strong risk-adjusted capitalization, disciplined underwriting focus, increasing use of predictive modeling technology, strong independent retail agency relationships, and consistently stable loss reserves. We have been rated “A” or higher by A.M. Best for the past 84 years. A downgrade from A.M. Best to a rating below “A-” is an event of default under our Line of Credit and could affect our ability to write new business with customers and/or agents, some of whom are required (under various third-party agreements) to maintain insurance with a carrier that maintains a specified A.M. Best minimum rating.
Ratings by other major rating agencies are as follows:
•
Fitch Ratings ("Fitch") - Our “A+” rating was reaffirmed in Second Quarter 2014, citing our improved underwriting results, strong independent agency relationships, solid loss reserve position, and enhanced diversification through continued efforts to reduce our concentration in New Jersey. Our outlook has been revised to stable reflecting operating earnings-based interest coverage that showed improvement in 2013.
•
S&P Ratings Services ("S&P") - In the third quarter of 2013, S&P lowered our financial strength rating to “A-” from “A” under their revised rating criteria. The rating reflects our strong business risk profile and moderately strong financial risk profile, built on a strong competitive position in the regional small to midsize commercial insurance markets in Mid-Atlantic states and strong capital and earnings. The rating revision reflects S&P's view of our capital and earnings volatility relative to our peers. The outlook for the rating is stable citing the expectation that we will sustain our strong competitive position and business risk profile while maintaining a strong capital and earnings profile.
•
Moody's Investor Service ("Moody's") - Our "A2" financial strength rating was reaffirmed in the first quarter of 2013 by Moody's, which cited our strong regional franchise with established independent agency support, along with solid risk adjusted capitalization and strong invested asset quality. Our outlook was revised to negative, citing that our underwriting results have lagged similarly rated peers.
Our S&P, Moody's, and Fitch financial strength and associated credit ratings affect our ability to access capital markets. The interest rate on our Line of Credit varies and is based on, among other factors, the Parent's debt ratings. There can be no assurance that our ratings will continue for any given period of time or that they will not be changed. It is possible that positive or negative ratings actions by one or more of the rating agencies may occur in the future.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
At
June 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
, we did not have any material relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or for other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As such, we are not exposed to any material financing, liquidity, market, or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.
52
Table of Contents
Contractual Obligations, Contingent Liabilities, and Commitments
Our future cash payments associated with: (i) loss and loss expense reserves; (ii) contractual obligations pursuant to operating leases for office space and equipment; (iii) notes payable; and (iv) contractual obligations related to our alternative and other investments portfolio have not materially changed since
December 31, 2013
. We expect to have the capacity to repay and/or refinance these obligations as they come due.
We have issued no material guarantees on behalf of others and have no trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts accounted for at fair value. We have no material transactions with related parties other than those disclosed in Note 17. "Related Party Transactions" included in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of our 2013 Annual Report.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
There have been no material changes in the information about market risk set forth in our
2013 Annual Report
.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”)), as of the end of the period covered by this report. In performing this evaluation, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in
Internal Control - Integrated Framework
in 1992. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are: (i) effective in recording, processing, summarizing, and reporting information on a timely basis that we are required to disclose in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act; and (ii) effective in ensuring that information that we are required to disclose in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. No changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) occurred during
Six Months 2014
that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
53
Table of Contents
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
In the ordinary course of conducting business, we are named as defendants in various legal proceedings. Most of these proceedings are claims litigation involving our Insurance Subsidiaries as either: (i) liability insurers defending or providing indemnity for third-party claims brought against insureds; or (ii) insurers defending first-party coverage claims brought against them. We account for such activity through the establishment of unpaid loss and loss expense reserves. We expect that the ultimate liability, if any, with respect to such ordinary course claims litigation, after consideration of provisions made for potential losses and costs of defense, will not be material to our consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
Our Insurance Subsidiaries are also from time to time involved in other legal actions, some of which assert claims for substantial amounts. These actions include, among others, putative class actions seeking certification of a state or national class. Such putative class actions have alleged, for example, improper reimbursement of medical providers paid under workers compensation and personal and commercial automobile insurance policies. Our Insurance Subsidiaries are also involved from time to time in individual actions in which extra-contractual damages, punitive damages, or penalties are sought, such as claims alleging bad faith in the handling of insurance claims. We believe that we have valid defenses to these cases. We expect that the ultimate liability, if any, with respect to such lawsuits, after consideration of provisions made for estimated losses, will not be material to our consolidated financial condition. Nonetheless, given the large or indeterminate amounts sought in certain of these actions, and the inherent unpredictability of litigation, an adverse outcome in certain matters could, from time to time, have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations or cash flows in particular quarterly or annual periods.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
Certain risk factors exist that can have a significant impact on our business, liquidity, capital resources, results of operations, financial condition, and debt ratings. The impact of these risk factors also could impact certain actions that we take as part of our long-term capital strategy, including but not limited to, contributing capital to any or all of the Insurance Subsidiaries, issuing additional debt and/or equity securities, repurchasing our equity securities, redeeming our fixed income securities, or increasing or decreasing, stockholders dividends. We operate in a continually changing business environment and new risk factors emerge from time to time. Consequently, we can neither predict such new risk factors nor assess the potential future impact, if any, they might have on our business. There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” in our 2013 Annual Report other than as discussed below.
We face risks regarding our flood business because of uncertainties regarding the NFIP.
We are the fifth largest insurance group participating in the write-your-own ("WYO") arrangement of the NFIP, which is managed by the Mitigation Division of Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”) in the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. For WYO participation, we receive an expense allowance for policies written and a servicing fee for claims administered. Under the program, all losses are 100% reinsured by the Federal Government. Currently, the expense allowance is 30.7% of direct premiums written. The servicing fee is the combination of 0.9% of direct written premiums and 1.5% of incurred losses.
The NFIP is funded by Congress. In 2012, after the NFIP had numerous short-term funding delays, Congress passed, and the President signed, the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 (“Biggert-Waters Act”). The Biggert-Waters Act: (i) extended NFIP funding to September 30, 2017; and (ii) moved the program to more market based rates for certain flood policyholders. FEMA implemented these rates throughout 2013, which created significant public discontent and Congressional concern over the impact of the new rates on NFIP insureds.
Consequently, Congress passed and, on March 21, 2014, the President signed into law, the Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 2014 (“Flood Affordability Act”). The Flood Affordability Act substantially modifies certain provisions of the Biggert-Waters Act, and makes certain other program changes. Significantly, the Flood Affordability Act substantially modifies many of the Biggert-Waters Act rate increases. Consequently, we are working with FEMA to implement the new rate structures.
As a WYO carrier, we are required to follow certain NFIP procedures when administering flood policies and claims. Some of these requirements may differ from our normal business practices and may present a reputational risk to our brand. Insurance companies are regulated by states; however, the NFIP is a federal program. Consequently, we have the risk that regulatory positions taken by the NFIP and a state regulator on the same issue may conflict.
54
Table of Contents
Despite the passage of the Flood Affordability Act, the NFIP remains under scrutiny by policymakers. The uncertainty behind the public policy debate and politics of flood insurance funding and reform make it difficult for us to predict the future of the NFIP and the continued financial viability of our participation in the program.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
The following table provides information regarding our purchases of our common stock in
Second Quarter 2014
:
Period
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
1
Average Price
Paid per Share
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Programs
Maximum Number of
Shares that May Yet
Be Purchased Under the Announced Programs
April 1 – 30, 2014
5,938
$
22.47
—
—
May 1 - 31, 2014
—
—
—
—
June 1 – 30, 2014
5
23.27
—
—
Total
5,943
$
22.47
—
—
1
During
Second Quarter 2014
,
5,943
shares were purchased from employees in connection with the vesting of restricted stock units. These repurchases were made to satisfy tax withholding obligations with respect to those employees. These shares were not purchased as part of any publicly announced program. The shares that were purchased in connection with the vesting of restricted stock units were purchased at fair market value as defined in the Selective Insurance Group, Inc. 2005 Omnibus Stock Plan As Amended and Restated Effective as of May 1, 2010.
55
Table of Contents
Item 6. EXHIBITS.
(a) Exhibits:
Exhibit No.
* 11
Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings.
* 31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
* 31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
* 32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer in accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
* 32.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer in accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
** 101.INS
XBRL Instance Document.
** 101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
** 101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
** 101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
** 101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
** 101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
* Filed herewith.
** Furnished and not filed herewith.
56
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SELECTIVE INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
Registrant
By: /s/ Gregory E. Murphy
July 31, 2014
Gregory E. Murphy
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
By: /s/ Dale A. Thatcher
July 31, 2014
Dale A. Thatcher
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(principal accounting officer and principal financial officer)
57