Companies: 10,651     total market cap: NZ$232.358 T
$USD๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธโ‚ฌEUR๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บโ‚นINR๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณยฃGBP๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง$CAD๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ$AUD๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ$HKD๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ$SGD๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ
Electronic Arts
EA
#467
Rank
NZ$84.68 B
Marketcap
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States
Country
NZ$338.59
Share price
-0.01%
Change (1 day)
62.25%
Change (1 year)
๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿ’ป Tech๐ŸŽฎ Video games Entertainment๐Ÿ•น๏ธ Esports
Categories
  1. Electronic Arts
  2. Quarterly Reports (10-Q)
  3. Submitted on 2005-08-03

Electronic Arts - 10-Q quarterly report FY


Text size:
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2005

OR

[   ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period from                      to                    

Commission File No. 0-17948

ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
   
Delaware 94-2838567
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
   
209 Redwood Shores Parkway  
Redwood City, California 94065
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(650) 628-1500
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES S NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES S NO o

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

       
      Outstanding as of
  Par Value August 1, 2005
Common Stock
 $0.01  303,519,559

 

ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2005
Table of Contents
     
  Page 
Part I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
    
Item 1. Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
    
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2005 and March 31, 2005
  3 
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
  4 
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
  5 
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
  6 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  18 
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
  19 
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
  43 
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
  46 
Part II – OTHER INFORMATION
    
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
  47 
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
  47 
Item 6. Exhibits
  48 
Signature
  49 
Exhibit Index
  50 
 EXHIBIT 10.1
 EXHIBIT 10.2
 EXHIBIT 10.3
 EXHIBIT 10.4
 EXHIBIT 10.5
 EXHIBIT 10.6
 EXHIBIT 10.7
 EXHIBIT 15.1
 EXHIBIT 31.1
 EXHIBIT 31.2
 EXHIBIT 32.1
 EXHIBIT 32.2

2

Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
         
(Unaudited) June 30,  March 31, 
(In millions, except par value data) 2005  2005 (a) 
   

ASSETS

        

Current assets:

        
Cash and cash equivalents
 $874  $1,270 
Short-term investments
  1,699   1,688 
Marketable equity securities
  176   140 
Receivables, net of allowances of $111 and $162, respectively
  167   296 
Inventories
  66   62 
Deferred income taxes
  87   86 
Other current assets
  194   164 
 
      
Total current assets
  3,263   3,706 

Property and equipment, net

  359   353 
Investments in affiliates
  9   10 
Goodwill
  155   153 
Other intangibles, net
  33   36 
Deferred income taxes
  17   19 
Other assets
  82   93 
 
      
TOTAL ASSETS
 $3,918  $4,370 
 
      

LIABILITIES, MINORITY INTEREST AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

        

Current liabilities:

        
Accounts payable
 $113  $134 
Accrued and other liabilities
  597   694 
 
      
Total current liabilities
  710   828 

Other liabilities

  31   33 
 
      
TOTAL LIABILITIES
  741   861 

Commitments and contingencies

  –   – 
Minority interest
  10   11 

Stockholders’ equity:

        
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value. 10 shares authorized
  –   – 
Common stock, $0.01 par value. 1,000 shares authorized; 305 and 310 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
  3   3 
Paid-in capital
  1,121   1,434 
Retained earnings
  1,947   2,005 
Accumulated other comprehensive income
  96   56 
 
      
Total stockholders’ equity
  3,167   3,498 
 
      
TOTAL LIABILITIES, MINORITY INTEREST AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 $3,918  $4,370 
 
      
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
(a) Derived from audited financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

ELECTRONIC ARTS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
         
  Three Months Ended 
(Unaudited) June 30, 
(In millions, except per share data) 2005  2004 
   

Net revenue

 $365  $432 
Cost of goods sold
  151   177 
 
      

Gross profit

  214   255 

Operating expenses:

        
Marketing and sales
  75   63 
General and administrative
  51   35 
Research and development
  183   131 
Amortization of intangibles
  1   1 
 
      

Total operating expenses

  310   230 
 
      

Operating income (loss)

  (96)  25 
Interest and other income, net
  17   9 
 
      

Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes and minority interest

  (79)  34 
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
  (23)  10 
 
      
Income (loss) before minority interest
  (56)  24 
Minority Interest
  (2)  — 
 
      

Net income (loss)

 $(58) $24 
 
      

Net income (loss) per share:

        
Basic
 $(0.19) $0.08 
Diluted
 $(0.19) $0.08 
Number of shares used in computation:
        
Basic
  308   302 
Diluted
  308   316 
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

Table of Contents

ELECTRONIC ARTS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
         
  Three Months Ended 
(Unaudited) June 30, 
(In millions) 2005  2004 
   

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

        
Net income (loss)
 $(58) $24 
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:
        
Depreciation and amortization
  23   16 
Minority interest
  2   – 
Realized (gains) losses on investments and on sale of property and equipment
  1   (2)
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
  5   13 
Other operating activities
  –   (1)
Change in assets and liabilities:
        
Receivables, net
  142   37 
Inventories
  1   1 
Other assets
  (12)  – 
Accounts payable
  (25)  (48)
Accrued and other liabilities
  (110)  (106)
 
      

Net cash used in operating activities

  (31)  (66)
 
      

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

        
Capital expenditures
  (33)  (26)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
  –   15 
Proceeds from sale of marketable equity securities
  4   – 
Purchase of short-term investments
  (138)  (1,557)
Proceeds from maturities and sales of short-term investments
  134   572 
Acquisition of subsidiary, net of cash acquired
  (3)  – 
Other investing activities
  (1)  – 
 
      

Net cash used in investing activities

  (37)  (996)
 
      

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

        
Proceeds from sales of common stock through employee stock plans and other plans
  19   44 
Repurchase and retirement of common stock
  (337)  – 
 
      

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

  (318)  44 
 
      

Effect of foreign exchange on cash and cash equivalents

  (10)  1 
 
      
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
  (396)  (1,017)
Beginning cash and cash equivalents
  1,270   2,150 
 
      
Ending cash and cash equivalents
  874   1,133 
Short-term investments
  1,699   1,236 
 
      

Ending cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments

 $2,573  $2,369 
 
      

Supplemental cash flow information:

        
Cash paid during the period for income taxes
 $5  $3 
 
      

Non-cash investing activities:

        
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on investments, net
 $47  $(13)
 
      
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

Table of Contents

ELECTRONIC ARTS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(1) DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Electronic Arts Inc. develops, markets, publishes and distributes interactive software games that are playable by consumers on home video game consoles (such as the Sony PlayStation®2, Microsoft Xbox® and Nintendo GameCubeTM), personal computers, mobile platforms — including hand-held game players (such as the Game Boy® Advance, Nintendo DSTM and PlayStation® Portable “PSPTM”) and cellular handsets — and online, over the Internet and other proprietary online networks. Some of our games are based on content that we license from others (e.g., Madden NFL Football, Harry Potter and FIFA Soccer), and some of our games are based on intellectual property that is wholly-owned by us (e.g., The SimsTM and Need for SpeedTM). Our goal is to develop titles which appeal to the mass markets, which often means translating and localizing them for sale in non-English speaking countries. In addition, we also attempt to create software game “franchises” that allow us to publish new titles on a recurring basis that are based on the same property. Examples of this include our annual iterations of our sports-based franchises (e.g., NCAA® Football and FIFA Soccer), titles based on long-lived movie properties (e.g., James BondTM) and wholly-owned properties that can be successfully sequeled (e.g., The Sims and Need for Speed).
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are unaudited and reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in these condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. The results of operations for the current interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the current year or any other period.
These Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 7, 2005.
On October 18, 2004, our Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to an aggregate of $750 million of shares of our common stock. Pursuant to the authorization, we may repurchase shares of our common stock from time to time in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions over the course of a twelve-month period. During the three months ended June 30, 2005, we repurchased and retired 6.3 million shares of our common stock for approximately $337 million. From the inception of the program through June 30, 2005, we have repurchased and retired 7.1 million shares of our common stock for approximately $378 million.
(2) FISCAL YEAR AND FISCAL QUARTER
Our fiscal year is reported on a 52/53-week period that, historically, has ended on the final Saturday of March in each year. Beginning with the current fiscal year ending March 31, 2006, we will end our fiscal year on the Saturday nearest March 31. The results of operations for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 contain the following number of weeks:
     
Fiscal Years Ended Number of Weeks Fiscal Period End Date
March 31, 2006
 53 weeks April 1, 2006
March 31, 2005
 52 weeks March 26, 2005
The results of operations for the fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 contain the following number of weeks:
     
Fiscal Quarters Ended Number of Weeks Fiscal Period End Date
June 30, 2005
 14 weeks July 2, 2005
June 30, 2004
 13 weeks June 26, 2004
For simplicity of presentation, all fiscal periods are treated as ending on a calendar month end.

6

Table of Contents

(3) EMPLOYEE STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
We account for stock-based awards to employees using the intrinsic value method in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”. We have adopted the disclosure-only provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, as amended.
Had compensation cost for our stock-based compensation plans been measured based on the estimated fair value at the grant dates in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, as amended, we estimate that our reported net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share would have been the pro forma amounts indicated below. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The following weighted-average assumptions were used for grants made under our stock-based compensation plan during the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004:
         
  Three Months Ended 
  June 30, 
  2005  2004 
   
Risk-free interest rate
  3.7%  3.0%
Expected volatility
  35%  40%
Expected life of stock options (in years)
  3.2   3.2 
Expected life of employee stock purchase plans (in months)
  6   6 
Assumed dividends
 None None
Our calculations are based on a multiple option valuation approach and forfeitures are recognized when they occur.
         
  Three Months Ended 
  June 30, 
(In millions, except per share data) 2005  2004 
   

Net income (loss):

        
As reported
 $(58) $24 
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair-value-based method for all awards, net of related tax effects
  (25)  (19)
 
      

Pro forma

 $(83) $5 
 
      

Net income (loss) per share:

        
As reported – basic
 $(0.19) $0.08 
Pro forma – basic
 $(0.27) $0.02 
As reported – diluted
 $(0.19) $0.08 
Pro forma – diluted
 $(0.27) $0.01 
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) (“SFAS No. 123R”), “Share-Based Payment”. SFAS No. 123R requires that the cost resulting from all share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements using a fair-value-based method. The statement replaces SFAS No. 123, supersedes APB No. 25, and amends SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows”. While the fair value method under SFAS No. 123R is very similar to the fair value method under SFAS No. 123 with regards to measurement and recognition of stock-based compensation, management is currently evaluating the impact of several of the key differences between the two standards on our consolidated financial statements. For example, SFAS No. 123 permits us to recognize forfeitures as they occur while SFAS No. 123R will require us to estimate future forfeitures and adjust our estimate on a quarterly basis. SFAS No. 123R will also require a classification change in the statement of cash flows, whereby a portion of the tax benefit from stock options will move from operating cash flow activities to financing cash flow activities (total cash flows will remain unchanged).
In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) released Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107,“Share-Based Payment”, which provides the views of the staff regarding the interaction between SFAS No. 123R and certain SEC rules and regulations for public companies. In April 2005, the SEC adopted a rule that amends the compliance dates of SFAS No. 123R. Under the revised compliance dates, we will be required to adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 123R no later than the first interim period of fiscal 2007. While management continues to evaluate the impact of SFAS No. 123R on our consolidated financial statements, we currently believe that the expensing of stock-based compensation will have an impact on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations similar to our pro forma disclosure under SFAS No. 123, as amended.

7

Table of Contents

(4) GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET
Goodwill information is as follows (in millions):
                 
          Effects of    
  As of      Foreign  As of 
  March 31,  Goodwill  Currency  June 30, 
  2005  Acquired  Translation  2005 
   
Goodwill
 $153  $3  $(1) $155 
   
Finite-lived intangibles consist of the following (in millions):
                     
  As of June 30, 2005 
  Gross              Other 
  Carrying  Accumulated          Intangibles, 
  Amount  Amortization  Impairment  Other  Net 
   
Developed/Core Technology
 $47  $(24) $(9) $1  $15 
Tradename
  37   (19)  (1)  –   17 
Subscribers and Other Intangibles
  11   (7)  (2)  (1)  1 
   
Total
 $95  $(50) $(12) $–  $33 
   
                     
  As of March 31, 2005 
  Gross              Other 
  Carrying  Accumulated          Intangibles, 
  Amount  Amortization  Impairment  Other  Net 
   
Developed/Core Technology
 $47  $(22) $(9) $1  $17 
Tradename
  37   (18)  (1)  –   18 
Subscribers and Other Intangibles
  11   (7)  (2)  (1)  1 
   
Total
 $95  $(47) $(12) $–  $36 
   
Amortization of intangibles for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 was $3 million (of which $2 million was recognized as cost of goods sold) and $1 million, respectively. Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over the lesser of their estimated useful lives or the agreement terms, typically from two to twelve years. As of June 30, 2005 and March 31, 2005, the weighted-average remaining useful life for finite-lived intangible assets was approximately 4.1 years and 4.3 years, respectively.
As of June 30, 2005, future amortization of finite-lived intangibles that will be recorded in cost of goods sold and operating expenses is estimated as follows (in millions):
     
Fiscal Year Ending March 31,
    
2006 (remaining 9 months)
 $8 
2007
  10 
2008
  6 
2009
  3 
2010
  2 
Thereafter
  4 
 
   
Total
 $33 
 
   

8

Table of Contents

(5) RESTRUCTURING AND ASSET IMPAIRMENT CHARGES
Restructuring and asset impairment information as of June 30, 2005 was as follows (in millions):
                 
  Accrual  Charges      Accrual 
  Beginning  Utilized  Adjustments  Ending 
  Balance  in Cash  to Operations  Balance 
   
Three Months Ended June 30, 2005
                
Facilities-related
 $10  $(1) $–  $9 
Year Ended March 31, 2005
                
Workforce
 $2  $(2) $–  $– 
Facilities-related
  12   (4)  2   10 
   
Total
 $14  $(6) $2  $10 
   
In fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, we entered into various restructurings based on management decisions. As of June 30, 2005, an aggregate of $24 million in cash had been paid out under the restructuring plans. The remaining projected net cash outlay of $9 million is expected to be utilized by January 2009. The facilities-related accrued obligation shown above is net of $12 million of estimated future sub-lease income. The restructuring accrual is included in other accrued expenses presented in Note 7 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
(6) ROYALTIES AND LICENSES
Our royalty expenses consist of payments to (1) content licensors, (2) independent software developers and (3) co-publishing and/or distribution affiliates. License royalties consist of payments made to celebrities, professional sports organizations, movie studios and other organizations for our use of their trademarks, copyrights, personal publicity rights, content and/or other intellectual property. Royalty payments to independent software developers are payments for the development of intellectual property related to our games. Co-publishing and distribution royalties are payments made to third parties for delivery of product.
Royalty-based payments made to content licensors and distribution affiliates are generally capitalized as prepaid royalties and expensed to cost of goods sold at the greater of the contractual or effective royalty rate based on expected net product sales. Prepayments made to thinly capitalized independent software developers and co-publishing affiliates are generally made in connection with the development of a particular product and, therefore, we are generally subject to development risk prior to the general release of the product. Accordingly, payments that are due prior to completion of a product are generally expensed as research and development as the services are incurred. Payments due after completion of the product (primarily royalty-based in nature) are generally expensed as cost of goods sold at the higher of the contractual or effective royalty rate based on expected net product sales.
Minimum guaranteed royalty obligations are initially recorded as an asset and as a liability at the contractual amount when payment is not contingent upon performance by the licensor. When payment is contingent upon performance by the licensor, we record royalty payments as an asset when actually paid and as a liability when incurred rather than upon execution of the contract. Minimum royalty payment obligations are classified as current liabilities to the extent such royalty payments are contractually due within the next twelve months. As of June 30, 2005 and March 31, 2005, approximately $44 million and $51 million, respectively, of minimum guaranteed royalty obligations had been recognized and are included in the tables below.
Each quarter, we also evaluate the future realization of our royalty-based assets as well as any unrecognized minimum commitments not yet paid to determine amounts we deem unlikely to be realized through product sales. Any impairments determined before the launch of a product are charged to research and development expense. Impairments determined post-launch are charged to cost of goods sold. In either case, we rely on estimated revenue to evaluate the future realization of prepaid royalties. If actual sales or revised revenue estimates fall below the initial revenue estimates, then the actual charge taken may be greater in any given quarter than anticipated. We had no impairments during the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.

9

Table of Contents

The current and long-term portions of prepaid royalties and minimum guaranteed royalty-related assets, included in other current assets and other assets, consisted of (in millions):
         
  As of  As of 
  June 30,  March 31, 
  2005  2005 
Other current assets
 $113  $59 
Other assets
  68   76 
 
      
Royalty-related assets
 $181  $135 
 
      
At any given time, depending on the timing of our payments to our co-publishing and/or distribution affiliates, content licensors and/or independent software developers, we recognize unpaid royalty amounts due to these parties as either accounts payable or accrued liabilities. The current and long-term portions of accrued royalties, included in accrued and other liabilities as well as other liabilities, consisted of (in millions):
         
  As of  As of 
  June 30,  March 31, 
  2005  2005 
Accrued liabilities
 $61  $88 
Other liabilities
  31   33 
 
      
Accrued royalties
 $92  $121 
 
      
In addition, as of June 30, 2005, we had approximately $1,379 million that we were committed to pay co-publishing and/or distribution affiliates and content licensors but that were generally contingent upon performance by the counterparty (i.e., delivery of the product or content or other factors) and were therefore not recorded in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 8 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
(7) BALANCE SHEET DETAILS
Inventories
Inventories as of June 30, 2005 and March 31, 2005 consisted of (in millions):
         
  As of  As of 
  June 30,  March 31, 
  2005  2005 
Raw materials and work in process
 $2  $2 
Finished goods (including manufacturing royalties)
  64   60 
 
      
Inventories
 $66  $62 
 
      

10

Table of Contents

Property and Equipment, Net
Property and equipment, net, as of June 30, 2005 and March 31, 2005 consisted of (in millions):
         
  As of  As of 
  June 30,  March 31, 
  2005  2005 
Computer equipment and software
 $397  $381 
Buildings
  114   106 
Leasehold improvements
  77   73 
Land
  59   60 
Office equipment, furniture and fixtures
  55   53 
Warehouse equipment and other
  12   12 
Construction in progress
  36   43 
 
      
 
  750   728 
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization
  (391)  (375)
 
      
Property and equipment, net
 $359  $353 
 
      
Depreciation and amortization expense associated with property and equipment amounted to $20 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and $16 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004.
Accrued and Other Liabilities
Accrued and other liabilities as of June 30, 2005 and March 31, 2005 consisted of (in millions):
         
  As of  As of 
  June 30,  March 31, 
  2005  2005 
Accrued income taxes
 $237  $267 
Other accrued expenses
  156   172 
Accrued compensation and benefits
  99   132 
Accrued royalties
  61   88 
Deferred revenue
  44   35 
 
      
Accrued and other liabilities
 $597  $694 
 
      
(8) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Lease Commitments and Residual Value Guarantees
We lease certain of our current facilities and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating lease agreements. We are required to pay property taxes, insurance and normal maintenance costs for certain of our facilities and will be required to pay any increases over the base year of these expenses on the remainder of our facilities.

In February 1995, we entered into a build-to-suit lease with a third party for our headquarters facility in Redwood City, California, which was refinanced with Keybank National Association in July 2001 and expires in July 2006. We accounted for this arrangement as an operating lease in accordance with SFAS No. 13, “Accounting for Leases”, as amended. Existing campus facilities developed in phase one comprise a total of 350,000 square feet and provide space for sales, marketing, administration and research and development functions. We have an option to purchase the property (land and facilities) for a maximum of $145 million or, at the end of the lease, to arrange for (i) an extension of the lease or (ii) sale of the property to a third party while we retain an obligation to the owner for approximately 90 percent of the difference between the sale price and the guaranteed residual value of up to $129 million if the sales price is less than this amount, subject to certain provisions of the lease.

11

Table of Contents

In December 2000, we entered into a second build-to-suit lease with Keybank National Association for a five and one-half year term beginning December 2000 to expand our Redwood City, California headquarters facilities and develop adjacent property adding approximately 310,000 square feet to our campus. Construction was completed in June 2002. We accounted for this arrangement as an operating lease in accordance with SFAS No. 13, as amended. The facilities provide space for sales, marketing, administration and research and development functions. We have an option to purchase the property for a maximum of $130 million or, at the end of the lease, to arrange for (i) an extension of the lease or (ii) sale of the property to a third party while we retain an obligation to the owner for approximately 90 percent of the difference between the sale price and the guaranteed residual value of up to $119 million if the sales price is less than this amount, subject to certain provisions of the lease.
We believe the estimated fair values of both properties under these operating leases are in excess of their respective guaranteed residual values as of June 30, 2005.
For the two lease agreements with Keybank National Association, as described above, the lease rates are based upon the LIBOR plus a margin and require us to maintain certain financial covenants as shown below, all of which we were in compliance with as of June 30, 2005.
             
          Actual as of 
Financial Covenants Requirement  June 30, 2005 

Consolidated Net Worth (in millions)

 equal to or greater than $2,061  $3,167 
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio
 equal to or greater than  3.00   15.77 
Total Consolidated Debt to Capital
 equal to or less than  60%   7.2% 
Quick Ratio – Q1 & Q2
 equal to or greater than  1.00   11.10 
Q3 & Q4
 equal to or greater than  1.75   N/A 
Letters of Credit
In July 2002, we provided an irrevocable standby letter of credit to Nintendo of Europe. The standby letter of credit guarantees performance of our obligations to pay Nintendo of Europe for trade payables. The original letter of credit guaranteed our obligations to Nintendo of Europe of up to €18 million. In April 2005, we reduced the guarantee to €8 million. This standby letter of credit expired in July 2005 and was renewed through July 2006. As of June 30, 2005, we had less than €1 million payable to Nintendo of Europe covered by this standby letter of credit.
In August 2003, we provided an irrevocable standby letter of credit to 300 California Associates II, LLC in replacement of our security deposit for office space. The standby letter of credit guarantees performance of our obligations to pay our lease commitment up to approximately $1 million. The standby letter of credit expires in December 2006. As of June 30, 2005, we did not have a payable balance covered by this standby letter of credit.
Development, Celebrity, League and Content Licenses: Payments and Commitments
The products produced by our studios are designed and created by our employee designers, artists, software programmers and by non-employee software developers (“independent artists” or “third-party developers”). We typically advance development funds to the independent artists and third-party developers during development of our games, usually in installment payments made upon the completion of specified development milestones.
Contractually, these payments are considered advances against subsequent royalties on the sales of the products. These terms are set forth in written agreements entered into with the independent artists and third-party developers. In addition, we have certain celebrity, league and content license contracts that contain minimum guarantee payments and marketing commitments that are not dependent on any deliverables. Celebrities and organizations with whom we have contracts include: ESPN (content in EA SPORTSTM games); FIFA and UEFA (professional soccer); NASCAR (stock car racing); John Madden (professional football); National Basketball Association (professional basketball); PGA TOUR (professional golf); Tiger Woods (professional golf); National Hockey League and NHLPA (professional hockey); Warner Bros. (Harry Potter, Batman and Superman); MGM/Danjaq (James Bond); New Line Productions (The Lord of the Rings); Saul Zaentz Company (The Lord of the Rings); Marvel Enterprises (fighting); National Football League, Arena Football League and PLAYERS Inc. (professional football); Collegiate Licensing Company (collegiate football and basketball); ISC (stock car racing); Island Def Jam (fighting); and Viacom Consumer Products (The Godfather). These developer and content license commitments represent the sum of (i) the cash payments due under non-royalty-bearing licenses and services agreements and (ii) the minimum payments and advances against royalties due under royalty-bearing licenses and services agreements, the majority of which are conditional upon performance by the counterparty. These minimum guarantee payments and any related marketing commitments are included in the table below.

12

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes our minimum contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of June 30, 2005, and the effect we expect them to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods (in millions):
                     
  Contractual Obligations  Commercial Commitment    
Fiscal Year     Developer/      Bank and    
Ending     Licensor      Other    
March 31, Leases  Commitments (1)  Marketing  Guarantees  Total 
     
2006 (remaining nine months)
 $34  $76  $34  $3  $147 
2007
  30   137   34   –   201 
2008
  23   125   30   –   178 
2009
  17   134   30   –   181 
2010
  13   121   31   –   165 
Thereafter
  35   830   197   –   1,062 
         
Total
 $152  $1,423  $356  $3  $1,934 
         

(1)Developer/licensor commitments include $44 million of commitments to developers or licensors that have been recorded in current and long-term liabilities and a corresponding amount in current and long-term assets in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2005 because the developer or licensor does not have any performance obligations to us.

The lease commitments disclosed above include contractual rental commitments of $21 million under real estate leases for unutilized office space due to our restructuring activities. These amounts, net of estimated future sub-lease income, were expensed in the periods of the related restructuring and are included in our accrued and other liabilities reported on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2005. See Note 5 in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Litigation
On July 29, 2004, a class action lawsuit, Kirschenbaum v. Electronic Arts Inc., was filed against us in Superior Court in San Mateo, California. The complaint alleges that we improperly classified “Image Production Employees” in California as exempt employees and seeks injunctive relief, unspecified monetary damages, interest and attorneys’ fees. The complaint was first amended on or about November 30, 2004 to add two former employees as named-plaintiffs, and amended again on or about January 5, 2005 to add another former employee as a named-plaintiff. The allegations in the complaint were not materially changed by the amendments.

On February 14, 2005, a second employment-related class action lawsuit, Hasty v. Electronic Arts Inc., was filed against us in Superior Court in San Mateo, California. The complaint alleges that we improperly classified “Engineers” in California as exempt employees and seeks injunctive relief, unspecified monetary damages, interest and attorneys’ fees. On or about March 16, 2005, we received a first amended complaint, which contains the same material allegations as the original complaint. We answered the first amended complaint on April 20, 2005.
On March 24, 2005, a class action lawsuit was filed against us and certain of our officers and directors. The complaint, which asserts claims under Section 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 based on allegedly false and misleading statements, was filed in the United States District Court, Northern District of California, by an individual purporting to represent a class of purchasers of EA common stock. Additional class action lawsuits have been filed in the same court by other individuals asserting the same claims against us. On May 9, 2005, the court consolidated the complaints, and on June 13, 2005, the court appointed lead plaintiff and lead counsel pursuant to the requirements of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. An amended consolidated complaint has not yet been filed. Separately, on April 12, 2005, a shareholder derivative action was filed in San Mateo Superior Court against certain of our officers and directors. This suit asserts claims based on substantially the same factual allegations set forth in the federal class action lawsuits. Two other shareholder derivative actions have been filed in San Mateo Superior Court based on the same claims. Two of the three derivative actions have been consolidated; a request to consolidate the third is currently pending. In addition, two other shareholder derivative actions based on substantially the same allegations have been filed in the United States District Court, Northern District of California. We have not responded to any of the complaints.

13

Table of Contents

In addition, we are subject to other claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. Our management considers that any liability from any reasonably foreseeable disposition of such other claims and litigation, individually or in the aggregate, would not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Director Indemnity Agreements
We have entered into indemnification agreements with the members of our Board of Directors at the time they join the Board to indemnify them to the extent permitted by law against any and all liabilities, costs, expenses, amounts paid in settlement and damages incurred by the directors as a result of any lawsuit, or any judicial, administrative or investigative proceeding in which the directors are sued as a result of their service as members of our Board of Directors.

(9) COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
SFAS No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income”, requires classification of other comprehensive income (loss) in a financial statement and display of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) separately from retained earnings and additional paid-in capital. Accumulated other comprehensive income primarily includes foreign currency translation adjustments, and the net of tax amounts for unrealized gains (losses) on investments and unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges.
The change in the components of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 are summarized as follows (in millions):
         
  Three Months Ended 
  June 30, 
  2005  2004 
   
Net income (loss)
 $(58) $24 
Other comprehensive income (loss):
        
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on investments, net of tax expense (benefit) of $0 and $(5), respectively
  47   (8)
Change in unrealized gain on derivative instruments, net of tax expense of $1 and $0, respectively
  4   – 
Foreign currency translation adjustments
  (11)  (5)
 
      
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
 $40  $(13)
 
      
Total comprehensive income (loss)
 $(18) $11 
 
      
The foreign currency translation adjustments are not adjusted for income taxes as they relate to indefinite investments in non-U.S. subsidiaries.

14

Table of Contents

(10) NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
The following table summarizes the computations of basic earnings per share (“Basic EPS”) and diluted earnings per share (“Diluted EPS”). Basic EPS is computed as net income divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock-based compensation plans including stock options, restricted stock awards, warrants and other convertible securities using the treasury stock method. Effective August 2, 2004, each outstanding share of Class A common stock was reclassified as one share of common stock and prior period Class A common stock has been reclassified to reflect these amendments.
         
  Three Months Ended 
  June 30, 
(In millions, except per share data): 2005  2004 
   

Net income (loss)

 $(58) $24 
 
      

Shares used to compute net income (loss) per share:

        
Weighted-average common stock outstanding – basic
  308   302 
Dilutive potential common stock equivalents
  –   14 
 
      

Weighted-average common stock outstanding – diluted

  308   316 
 
      

Net income (loss) per share:

        
Basic
 $(0.19) $0.08 
Diluted
 $(0.19) $0.08 
As a result of our net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2005, we have excluded certain stock awards from the Diluted EPS calculation as their inclusion would have been antidilutive. Had we reported net income for this period, an additional 10 million shares of potential common stock equivalents would have been included in the number of shares used to calculate Diluted EPS for the three months ended June 30, 2005.
Excluded from the above computation of weighted-average common shares for Diluted EPS for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were options to purchase 7 million and less than 1 million shares of common stock, respectively, as the options’ exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares for the period. For the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, the weighted-average exercise price of these options was $63.19 and $52.35 per share, respectively.
(11) SEGMENT INFORMATION
SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”, establishes standards for the reporting by public business enterprises of information about product lines, geographic areas and major customers. The method for determining what information to report is based on the way that management organizes our operating segments for making operational decisions and assessments of financial performance.
Our chief operating decision maker is considered to be our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). The CEO reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis accompanied by disaggregated information about revenue by geographic region and by product line for purposes of making operating decisions and assessing financial performance. Our view and reporting of business segments may change due to changes in the underlying business facts and circumstances and the evolution of our reporting to our CEO.

15

Table of Contents

Information about our total net revenue by product line for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 is presented below (in millions):
         
  Three Months Ended 
  June 30, 
  2005  2004 

Consoles

        
PlayStation 2
 $117  $162 
Xbox
  44   57 
Nintendo GameCube
  22   26 
Other consoles
  –   2 
 
      
Total Consoles
  183   247 
PC
  74   67 
Mobility
        
PSP
  33   – 
Nintendo DS
  12   – 
Game Boy Advance
  6   18 
Cellular Handsets
  1   – 
 
      
Total Mobility
  52   18 

Co-publishing and Distribution

  30   67 
Internet Services, Licensing and Other
        
Subscription Services
  15   13 
Licensing, Advertising and Other
  11   20 
 
      
Total Internet Services, Licensing and Other
  26   33 
 
      
Total Net Revenue
 $365  $432 
 
      
Information about our operations in North America, Europe and Asia Pacific for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 is presented below (in millions):
                 
  North      Asia    
  America  Europe  Pacific  Total 
   

Three months ended June 30, 2005

                
Net revenue from unaffiliated customers
 $184  $144  $37  $365 
Interest income, net
  13   7   –   20 
Depreciation and amortization
  14   8   1   23 
Total assets
  2,603   1,246   69   3,918 
Capital expenditures
  26   5   2   33 
Long-lived assets
  326   211   10   547 

Three months ended June 30, 2004

                
Net revenue from unaffiliated customers
 $211  $190  $31  $432 
Interest income, net
  7   1   –   8 
Depreciation and amortization
  9   6   1   16 
Total assets
  2,538   768   64   3,370 
Capital expenditures
  21   4   1   26 
Long-lived assets
  257   140   6   403 
Our direct sales to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. represented approximately 12 percent of total net revenue for both the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.

16

Table of Contents

(12) IMPACT OF RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In March 2004, the FASB ratified the measurement and recognition guidance and certain disclosure requirements for impaired securities as described in Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 03-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments”. In June 2005, the FASB directed its staff to issue proposed FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) EITF 03-1-a, “Implementation Guidance for the Application of Paragraph 16 of EITF Issue No. 03-1,” as final. The FASB plans to retitle this FSP as FSP FAS 115-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments”. The final FSP will supersede EITF Issue No. 03-1 and EITF Topic D-44, “Recognition of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment upon the Planned Sale of a Security Whose Cost Exceeds Fair Value.” The final FSP will replace the guidance set forth in paragraphs 10 through 18 of EITF Issue No. 03-1 with references to existing other-than-temporary impairment guidance. FSP FAS 115-1 would be effective for other-than-temporary impairment analysis conducted in periods beginning after September 15, 2005. Management is currently evaluating what impact the adoption of the measurement and recognition guidance in FSP FAS 115-1 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs — an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4”. SFAS No. 151 amends the guidance in Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing”, to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage) and requires that those items be recognized as current-period charges. SFAS No. 151 also requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Management believes the adoption of SFAS No. 151 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections – A Replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3”. SFAS No. 154 changes the requirements for the accounting and reporting of a change in accounting principle. Under previous guidance, changes in accounting principle were recognized as a cumulative affect in the net income of the period of the change. The new statement requires retrospective application of changes in accounting principle, limited to the direct effects of the change, to prior periods’ financial statements, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. Additionally, this Statement requires that a change in depreciation, amortization or depletion method for long-lived, nonfinancial assets be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate effected by a change in accounting principle and that correction of errors in previously issued financial statements should be termed a “restatement.” SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and correction of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. Management does not believe the adoption of SFAS No. 154 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

17

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Electronic Arts Inc.:

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Electronic Arts Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of July 2, 2005, and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the three-month periods ended July 2, 2005 and June 26, 2004.These condensed consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Electronic Arts Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 26, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated June 3, 2005, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 26, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
 
KPMG LLP


Mountain View, California
August 3, 2005

18

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding industry prospects and future results of operations or financial position, made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward looking. We use words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “expect”, “intend” (and the negative of any of these terms), “future” and similar expressions to help identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to business and economic risk and reflect management’s current expectations, and involve subjects that are inherently uncertain and difficult to predict. Our actual results could differ materially. We will not necessarily update information if any forward-looking statement later turns out to be inaccurate. Risks and uncertainties that may affect our future results include, but are not limited to, those discussed in this report below under the heading “Risk Factors”, as well as in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on June 7, 2005 and in other documents we have filed with the SEC.
OVERVIEW
The following overview is a top-level discussion of our operating results as well as some of the trends and drivers that affect our business. Management believes that an understanding of these trends and drivers is important in order to understand our results for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as well as our future prospects. This summary is not intended to be exhaustive, nor is it intended to be a substitute for the detailed discussion and analysis provided elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, including in the remainder of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, “Risk Factors” or the condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes. Additional information can be found within the “Business” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the SEC on June 7, 2005 and in other documents we have filed with the SEC.
About Electronic Arts
We develop, market, publish and distribute interactive software games that are playable by consumers on home video game consoles (such as the Sony PlayStation® 2, Microsoft Xbox® and Nintendo GameCubeTM consoles), personal computers, mobile platforms — including hand-held game players (such as the Game Boy® Advance, Nintendo DSTM and PlayStation® Portable “PSPTM”) and cellular handsets — and online, over the Internet and other proprietary online networks. Some of our games are based on content that we license from others (e.g., Madden NFL Football, Harry Potter and FIFA Soccer), and some of our games are based on our own wholly-owned intellectual property (e.g., The SimsTM and Need for SpeedTM). Our goal is to develop titles which appeal to the mass markets, which often means translating and localizing them for sale in non-English speaking countries. In addition, we also attempt to create software game “franchises” that allow us to publish new titles on a recurring basis that are based on the same property. Examples of this are the annual iterations of our sports-based franchises (e.g., NCAA® Football and FIFA Soccer), titles based on long-lived movie properties (e.g., James Bond and Harry Potter) and wholly-owned properties that can be successfully sequeled (e.g., The Sims and Need for Speed).
Overview of Financial Results
Total net revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was $365 million, down 15.5 percent as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2004. Net revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was driven by our Medal of Honor and Battlefield franchises and the release of Batman BeginsTM. The strength of these titles did not offset last year’s strong performance of our Harry Potter and Fight Night franchises as well as UEFA Euro 2004 released in the three months ended June 30, 2004 in conjunction with the UEFA Euro 2004 football tournament held in Europe.Medal of Honor European AssaultTM and Battlefield 2TM both reached platinum status (over one million copies sold) in the quarter.
Net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was $58 million as compared to net income for the three months ended June 30, 2004 of $24 million. Diluted loss per share for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was $0.19 as compared to diluted income per share of $0.08 for the three months ended June 30, 2004.
We used $31 million in cash from operations during the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to $66 million during the three months ended June 30, 2004. The decrease in cash used in operating activities resulted primarily from the collection of receivables, partially offset by the overall decline in net income during the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2004.

19

Table of Contents

Management’s Overview of Historical and Prospective Business Trends
Transition to Next-Generation Consoles. Our industry is cyclical and we believe it has entered into a transition stage heading into the next cycle. Beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2006 and continuing over the course of the next twelve to eighteen months thereafter, we expect Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo to introduce new video game consoles into the market. During this transition, we intend to continue developing new titles for the current-generation of video game consoles while we also make significant investments as we prepare to introduce products that operate on the next-generation consoles. We have incurred, and expect to continue to incur, higher costs during this transition to next-generation consoles. We also expect development costs for next-generation video games to be greater on a per-title basis than development costs for current-generation video games. In addition, sales of video games for current generation consoles may begin to decline and consumers may defer game software purchases until the next-generation consoles become available. While we expect our sales and gross profit to increase for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 as compared to prior fiscal years, such increases may not offset the increased costs we have incurred and expect to continue to incur, during the transition. As we move through the transition, we expect our operating results to be more volatile and difficult to predict, which could cause our stock price to fluctuate significantly.
Expansion of Mobile Platforms. The introduction of the PSP and NDS, and to a lesser extent, increased demand for gameplay on cellular handsets, has resulted in increased sales of titles for mobile platforms. During the three months ended June 30, 2005, our net revenue from sales of our titles for mobile platforms increased to $52 million from $18 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. As the mobile platform installed base continues to grow, we expect that sales of our titles for these platforms may become an increasingly important part of our business, particularly during the transition from current-generation to next-generation consoles.
Increasing Cost of Titles. Titles have become increasingly expensive to produce and market as the platforms on which they are played continue to advance technologically and consumers demand continual improvements in the overall gameplay experience. We expect this trend to continue throughout the transition from current-generation to next-generation platforms as (1) we become more familiar with, and gain expertise in, developing titles for next-generation platforms, (2) we require larger production teams to create our titles, (3) the technology needed to develop titles becomes more complex, (4) the number and nature of the platforms for which we develop titles increases and becomes more diverse, (5) the cost of licensing the third-party intellectual property we use in many of our titles increases and (6) we develop new methods to distribute our content via the Internet and on hand-held and wireless devices.
Software Prices. We expect the average prices of our titles for current-generation consoles to decline as (1) more value-oriented consumers purchase current-generation consoles and (2) a greater number of competitive titles are published. As a result, we expect our gross margins to be negatively impacted.
Sales of “Hit” Titles. Sales of “hit” titles, several of which were top sellers across a number of international markets, continued to contribute to our revenue growth. Our top-selling titles across all platforms worldwide during the three months ended June 30, 2005 were Medal of Honor European Assault, Battlefield 2 and Batman Begins. Hit titles are important to our financial performance because they benefit from overall economies of scale. We have developed, and it is our objective to continue to develop, many of our hit titles to become franchise titles that can be regularly iterated.
International Operations and Sales Growth. During the first three months of fiscal 2006, net revenue from international sales accounted for approximately 50 percent of our total net revenue, down from 51 percent during the first three months of fiscal 2005. Our international net revenue was primarily driven by sales in Europe and, to a more limited extent, sales in Asia Pacific. Although foreign exchange rates favorably impacted our net revenue in the three months ended June 30, 2005, we do not necessarily expect this trend to continue during the remainder of fiscal 2006. We anticipate that international net revenue will increase during the remainder of fiscal 2006 as the console installed base continues to expand outside of North America. In particular, we believe that in order to succeed in China and Japan, it is important to develop content locally. As such, we expect to devote resources to hiring local development talent and expanding our infrastructure in each country, most notably, through the expansion and creation of local studio facilities. In addition, we anticipate establishing online game marketing, publishing and distribution functions in China. As part of this strategy, we may seek to partner with established local companies through acquisitions, joint ventures or other similar arrangements. Our international business has also grown through acquisitions and investments such as our acquisition of Criterion Software Group Ltd. and our tender offer for Digital Illusions C.E. (DICE).

20

Table of Contents

Foreign Exchange Impact. Given that a significant portion of our business is conducted internationally in foreign currency, fluctuations in currency prices can have a material impact on our results of operations. For example, the average exchange rate for the Euro, as compared to the U.S. dollar, increased from $1.20 per Euro during the three months ended June 30, 2004 to $1.29 per Euro during the three months ended June 30, 2005. Changes in foreign currency rates improved our net revenue by approximately $10 million, or 2 percent, for the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2004. We currently expect this will be the last quarter in fiscal 2006 in which foreign exchange rates will favorably impact our net revenue. Although we intend to continue to utilize foreign exchange forward and option contracts to either mitigate or hedge against some foreign currency exposures, we cannot predict with certainty the effect foreign currency fluctuations will have on us during fiscal 2006.
Expansion of Studio Resources and Technology. In fiscal 2005, we devoted significant resources to the overall expansion of our studio facilities in North America and Europe. We expect to continue to make significant investments in our studio facilities in North America in fiscal 2006. As we move through the life cycle of current-generation consoles, we will continue to devote significant resources to the development of current-generation titles while at the same time we continue to invest heavily in tools, technologies and titles for the next-generation of platforms and technology.
Increasing Licensing Costs. We generate a significant portion of our net revenue and operating income from games based on licensed content such as Madden NFL Football, FIFA, James Bond and Harry Potter. We have recently entered into new licenses and renewed older licenses, some of which contain higher royalty rates than similar license agreements we have entered into in the past. As a result, we expect our gross margins to be negatively impacted.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Our condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, contingent assets and liabilities, and revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. The policies discussed below are considered by management to be critical because they are not only important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations but also because application and interpretation of these policies requires both judgment and estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain and unknown. As a result, actual results may differ materially from our estimates.
Revenue Recognition, Sales Returns, Allowances and Bad Debt Reserves
We principally derive revenue from sales of packaged interactive software games designed for play on video game consoles (such as the PlayStation 2, Xbox and Nintendo GameCube), PCs and mobile platforms including hand-held game players (such as the Nintendo Game Boy Advance, Nintendo DS and Sony PSP) and cellular handsets. We evaluate the recognition of revenue based on the criteria set forth in Statement of Position (“SOP”) 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition”, as amended by SOP 98-9, “Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain Transactions” and Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements”, as revised by SAB No. 104, “Revenue Recognition”. We evaluate revenue recognition using the following basic criteria and recognize revenue when all four of the following criteria are met:
 • Evidence of an arrangement: Evidence of an agreement with the customer that reflects the terms and conditions to deliver products must be present in order to recognize revenue.

21

Table of Contents

 • Delivery: Delivery is considered to occur when the products are shipped and risk of loss has been transferred to the customer. For online games and services, revenue is recognized as the service is provided.
 
 • Fixed or determinable fee: If a portion of the arrangement fee is not fixed or determinable, we recognize that amount as revenue when the amount becomes fixed or determinable.
 
 • Collection is deemed probable: At the time of the transaction, we conduct a credit review of each customer involved in a significant transaction to determine the creditworthiness of the customer. Collection is deemed probable if we expect the customer to be able to pay amounts under the arrangement as those amounts become due. If we determine that collection is not probable, we recognize revenue when collection becomes probable (generally upon cash collection).
Determining whether and when some of these criteria have been satisfied often involves assumptions and judgments that can have a significant impact on the timing and amount of revenue we report. For example, for multiple element arrangements, we must make assumptions and judgments in order to: (1) determine whether and when each element has been delivered; (2) determine whether undelivered products or services are essential to the functionality of the delivered products and services; (3) determine whether vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value (“VSOE”) exists for each undelivered element; and (4) allocate the total price among the various elements we must deliver. Changes to any of these assumptions or judgments, or changes to the elements in a software arrangement, could cause a material increase or decrease in the amount of revenue that we report in a particular period.
Product revenue, including sales to resellers and distributors (“channel partners”), is recognized when the above criteria are met. We reduce product revenue for estimated future returns, price protection, and other offerings, which may occur with our customers and channel partners. In certain countries, we have stock-balancing programs for our PC products, which allow for the exchange of PC products by resellers under certain circumstances. It is our general practice to exchange products or give credits, rather than give cash refunds.
In certain countries, from time to time, we decide to provide price protection for both our PC and video game system products. In our decision, we analyze historical returns, current sell-through of distributor and retailer inventory of our products, current trends in the video game market and the overall economy, changes in consumer demand and acceptance of our products and other related factors when evaluating the adequacy of the sales returns and price protection allowances. In addition, we monitor the volume of our sales to our channel partners and their inventories, as substantial overstocking in the distribution channel could result in high returns or higher price protection costs in subsequent periods.
In the future, actual returns and price protections may materially exceed our estimates as unsold products in the distribution channels are exposed to rapid changes in consumer preferences, market conditions or technological obsolescence due to new platforms, product updates or competing products. For example, the risk of product returns and/or price protection for our products may continue to increase as the PlayStation 2, Xbox and Nintendo GameCube consoles move through their lifecycles and an increasing number and aggregate amount of competitive products heighten pricing and competitive pressures. While management believes it can make reliable estimates regarding these matters, these estimates are inherently subjective. Accordingly, if our estimates changed, our returns and price protection reserves would change, which would impact the total net revenue we report. For example, if actual returns and/or price protection were significantly greater than the reserves we have established, our actual results would decrease our reported total net revenue. Conversely, if actual returns and/or price protection were significantly less than our reserves, this would increase our reported total net revenue.
Significant judgment is required to estimate our allowance for doubtful accounts in any accounting period. We determine our allowance for doubtful accounts by evaluating customer creditworthiness in the context of current economic trends. Depending upon the overall economic climate and the financial condition of our customers, the amount and timing of our bad debt expense and cash collection could change significantly.
Royalties and Licenses
Our royalty expenses consist of payments to (1) content licensors, (2) independent software developers and (3) co-publishing and/or distribution affiliates. License royalties consist of payments made to celebrities, professional sports organizations, movie studios and other organizations for our use of their trademark, copyright, personal publicity rights, content and/or other intellectual property. Royalty payments to independent software developers are payments for the development of intellectual property related to our games. Co-publishing and distribution royalties are payments made to third parties for delivery of product.

22

Table of Contents

Royalty-based payments made to content licensors and distribution affiliates generally are capitalized as prepaid royalties and expensed to cost of goods sold at the greater of the contractual or effective royalty rate based on expected net product sales. Prepayments made to thinly capitalized independent software developers and co-publishing affiliates are generally in connection with the development of a particular product and, therefore, we are generally subject to development risk prior to the general release of the product. Accordingly, payments that are due prior to completion of a product are generally expensed as research and development as the services are incurred. Payments due after completion of the product (primarily royalty-based in nature) are generally expensed as cost of goods sold at the higher of the contractual or effective royalty rate based on expected net product sales.
Minimum guaranteed royalty obligations are initially recorded as an asset and as a liability at the contractual amount when no significant performance remains with the licensor. When significant performance remains with the licensor, we record royalty payments as an asset when actually paid rather than upon execution of the contract. Minimum royalty payment obligations are classified as current liabilities to the extent such royalty payments are contractually due within the next twelve months. As of June 30, 2005 and March 31, 2005, approximately $44 million and $51 million, respectively, of minimum guaranteed royalty obligations had been recognized.
Each quarter, we also evaluate the future realization of our royalty-based assets as well as any unrecognized minimum commitments not yet paid to determine amounts we deem unlikely to be realized through product sales. Any impairments determined before the launch of a product are charged to research and development expense. Impairments determined post-launch are charged to cost of goods sold. In either case, we rely on estimated revenue to evaluate the future realization of prepaid royalties. If actual sales or revised revenue estimates fall below the initial revenue estimate, then the actual charge taken may be greater in any given quarter than anticipated. As of June 30, 2005, we had $181 million of royalty-related assets and $1,379 million of unrecognized minimum commitments not yet paid that could be impaired if our revenue estimates decrease. We had no impairments during the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
Valuation of Long-Lived Assets
We evaluate both purchased intangible assets and other long-lived assets in order to determine if events or changes in circumstances indicate a potential impairment in value exists. This evaluation requires us to estimate, among other things, the remaining useful lives of the assets and future cash flows of the business. These evaluations and estimates require the use of judgment. Our actual results could differ materially from our current estimates.
Under current accounting standards, we make judgments about the recoverability of purchased intangible assets and other long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate a potential impairment in the remaining value of the assets recorded on our condensed consolidated balance sheet. In order to determine if a potential impairment has occurred, management makes various assumptions about the future value of the asset by evaluating future business prospects and estimated cash flows. Our future net cash flows are primarily dependent on the sale of products for play on proprietary video game consoles, hand-held game players and PCs (collectively referred to as “platforms”). The success of our products is affected by our ability to accurately predict which platforms and which products we develop will be successful. Also, our revenue and earnings are dependent on our ability to meet our product release schedules. Due to product sales shortfalls, we may not realize the future net cash flows necessary to recover our long-lived assets, which may result in an impairment charge being recorded in the future. There were no impairment charges recorded in the three months ended June 30, 2005 or June 30, 2004.
Income Taxes
In the ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations where the tax law and ultimate tax determination is uncertain. As part of the process of preparing our condensed consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate prior to the completion and filing of tax returns for such periods. This process requires estimating both our geographic mix of income and our current tax exposures in each jurisdiction where we operate. These estimates involve complex issues, require extended periods of time to resolve, and require us to make judgments, such as anticipating the positions that we will take on tax returns prior to our actually preparing the returns and the outcomes of disputes with tax authorities. We are also required to make determinations of the need to record deferred tax liabilities and the recoverability of deferred tax assets. A valuation allowance is established to the extent recovery of deferred tax assets is not likely based on our estimation of future taxable income in each jurisdiction.

23

Table of Contents

In addition, changes in our business, including acquisitions, changes in our international structure, changes in the geographic location of business functions, changes in the geographic mix of income, as well as changes in our agreements with tax authorities, valuation allowances, applicable accounting rules, applicable tax laws and regulations, rulings and interpretations thereof, developments in tax audit and other matters, and variations in the estimated and actual level of annual pre-tax income can affect the overall effective income tax rate and result in a variance between the projected effective tax rate for any quarter and the final effective tax rate for the fiscal year. For example, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, we resolved certain tax-related matters with the Internal Revenue Service, which lowered our income tax expense by $20 million and resulted in a 2.5 percent rate reduction during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004. By contrast, adverse developments in audits or applicable law have resulted, and could in the future result, in increases in our tax expense. Similarly, we could experience a change in our tax expense if we take advantage of a new election that we are entitled to make under the U.S. income tax rules regarding the allocation between U.S. and foreign jurisdictions of tax deductions attributable to employee stock option compensation.
With respect to our projected effective income tax rate each quarter prior to the end of a fiscal year, we are required to make a projection of several items, including our projected mix of full-year income in each jurisdiction in which we operate and the related income tax expense in each jurisdiction. The projected annual effective income tax rate is also adjusted for taxes related to certain anticipated changes in how we do business. Significant non-recurring charges are taken in the quarter incurred. The actual results could vary from those projected, and as such, the overall effective income tax rate for a fiscal year could be different from that previously projected for the full year.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Our fiscal year is reported on a 52/53-week period that, historically, has ended on the final Saturday of March in each year. Beginning with the current fiscal year ending March 31, 2006, we will end our fiscal year on the Saturday nearest March 31. The results of operations for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 contain the following number of weeks and end on the dates indicated below:
     
Fiscal Years Ended Number of Weeks Fiscal Period End Date
March 31, 2006
 53 weeks April 1, 2006
March 31, 2005
 52 weeks March 26, 2005
The results of operations for the fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 contain the following number of weeks and end on the dates indicated below:
     
Fiscal Quarters Ended Number of Weeks Fiscal Period End Date
June 30, 2005
 14 weeks July 2, 2005
June 30, 2004
 13 weeks June 26, 2004
For simplicity of presentation, all fiscal periods are treated as ending on a calendar month end.
Although certain amounts presented have been rounded to the nearest million, corresponding percentage changes have been calculated on the basis of amounts rounded to the nearest thousand.
Net Revenue
We principally derive net revenue from sales of packaged interactive software games designed for play on video game consoles (such as the PlayStation 2, Xbox and Nintendo GameCube), PCs and mobile platforms which include hand-held game players (such as the Nintendo Game Boy Advance, Nintendo DS and Sony PSP) and cellular handsets. Additionally, in Europe and Asia Pacific, we generate a significant portion of net revenue by marketing and selling third-party interactive software games through our established distribution network. We also derive net revenue from selling subscriptions to some of our online games, programming third-party web sites with our game content, allowing other companies to manufacture and sell our products in conjunction with other products, and selling advertisements on our online web pages.

24

Table of Contents

From a geographical perspective, our total net revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were as follows (in millions):
                         
  Three Months Ended June 30, Increase / %
  2005 2004 (Decrease) Change

North America

 $184   50.4% $211   48.9% $(27)  (13.1%)
           

Europe

  144   39.5%  190   44.0%  (46)  (24.0%)
Asia Pacific
  37   10.1%  31   7.1%  6   20.8%
           
International
  181   49.6%  221   51.1%  (40)  (17.8%)
           
Total Net Revenue
 $365   100.0% $432   100.0% $(67)  (15.5%)
           
North America
For the three months ended June 30, 2005, net revenue in North America decreased by 13.1 percent as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2004. The net revenue decrease was primarily due to (1) lower sales of products from our Fight Night and Harry Potter franchises as these franchises did not have a corresponding title release during the three months ended June 30, 2005 and (2) higher net revenue in the three months ended June 30, 2004 from various co-publishing and distribution titles. Together, these items resulted in decreased net revenue of $80 million during the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2004. This decrease was partially offset by higher sales of products from our Medal of Honor and Battlefield franchises and the release of Batman Begins, which increased net revenue by $54 million in the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2004.
Europe
For the three months ended June 30, 2005, net revenue in Europe decreased by 24.0 percent as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2004. We estimate that foreign exchange rates (primarily the Euro and the British pound sterling) increased reported European net revenue by approximately $8 million, or 4 percent, for the three months ended June 30, 2005. Excluding the effect of foreign exchange rates, we estimate that European net revenue decreased by approximately $54 million, or 28 percent, for the three months ended June 30, 2005. The net revenue decrease was primarily due to (1) lower sales of products from our Harry Potter and Fight Night franchises as these franchises did not have a corresponding title release during the three months ended June 30, 2005, (2) higher prior year sales of UEFA Euro 2004 released in the three months ended June 30, 2004 in conjunction with the UEFA Euro 2004 football tournament held in Europe and (3) lower sales of products from The Sims and FIFA franchises. Together, these items resulted in a net revenue decrease of $96 million during the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2004. This decrease was partially offset by higher sales of products from our Medal of Honor and Battlefield franchises, the release of Batman Begins and catalog sales of FIFA Street, which increased net revenue by $63 million in the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2004.
Asia Pacific
For the three months ended June 30, 2005, net revenue in Asia Pacific increased by 20.8 percent as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2004. We estimate that foreign exchange rates increased reported Asia Pacific net revenue by approximately $2 million, or 6 percent, for the three months ended June 30, 2005. Excluding the effect of foreign exchange rates, we estimate that Asia Pacific net revenue increased by approximately $4 million, or 15 percent, for the three months ended June 30, 2005. The increase in net revenue was driven primarily by higher sales of our co-publishing and distribution titles, as well as our Battlefield, NBA STREET and Medal of Honor franchises. This increase was partially offset by lower sales from our Harry Potter franchise as this franchise did not have a corresponding title release during the three months ended June 30, 2005.

25

Table of Contents

Our total net revenue by product line for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 was as follows (in millions):
                         
  Three Months Ended June 30, Increase/ %
  2005 2004 (Decrease) Change

Consoles

                        
PlayStation 2
 $117   32.2% $162   37.4% $(45)  (27.6%)
Xbox
  44   12.0%  57   13.3%  (13)  (23.4%)
Nintendo GameCube
  22   6.1%  26   6.1%  (4)  (16.1%)
Other consoles
  –   0.0%  2   0.5%  (2)  (92.1%)
           
Total Consoles
  183   50.3%  247   57.3%  (64)  (25.9%)
PC
  74   20.3%  67   15.5%  7   11.1%
Mobility
                        
PSP
  33   8.8%  –   0.0%  33  N/A
Nintendo DS
  12   3.3%  –   0.0%  12  N/A
Game Boy Advance
  6   1.7%  18   4.2%  (12)  (65.5%)
Cellular Handsets
  1   0.3%  –   0.0%  1  N/A
           
Total Mobility
  52   14.1%  18   4.2%  34   180.1%
Co-publishing and Distribution
  30   8.1%  67   15.6%  (37)  (55.8%)

Internet Services, Licensing and Other

                        
Subscription Services
  15   4.2%  13   2.9%  2   21.3%
Licensing, Advertising and Other
  11   3.0%  20   4.5%  (9)  (43.6%)
           
Total Internet Services, Licensing and Other
  26   7.2%  33   7.4%  (7)  (18.4%)
           
Total Net Revenue
 $365   100.0% $432   100.0% $(67)  (15.5%)
           
PlayStation 2
Net revenue from PlayStation 2 products decreased from $162 million in the three months ended June 30, 2004 to $117 million in the three months ended June 30, 2005. As a percentage of total net revenue, sales of PlayStation 2 products decreased by 5.2 percent in the three months ended June 30, 2005. The decrease in net revenue was primarily driven by lower sales of products from our Harry Potter and Fight Night franchises, as well as higher prior year sales of UEFA Euro 2004released in the three months ended June 30, 2004 in conjunction with the UEFA Euro 2004 football tournament held in Europe. These decreases were partially offset by higher net revenue from our Medal of Honor franchise and the release of Batman Begins during the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to three months ended June 30, 2004.
Xbox
Net revenue from Xbox products decreased from $57 million in the three months ended June 30, 2004 to $44 million in the three months ended June 30, 2005. As a percentage of total net revenue, sales of Xbox products decreased by 1.3 percent in the three months ended June 30, 2005. The decrease in net revenue was primarily due to lower sales of products from our Fight Night and Harry Potter franchises, as well as higher prior year sales of UEFA Euro 2004. These decreases were partially offset by higher net revenue from our Medal of Honor franchise and the release of Batman Begins during the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to three months ended June 30, 2004.
Nintendo GameCube
Net revenue from Nintendo GameCube products decreased from $26 million in the three months ended June 30, 2004 to $22 million in the three months ended June 30, 2005. The decrease in net revenue was primarily due to lower sales of products from our Harry Potter franchise and partially offset by sales of products from our Medal of Honor franchise and the release of Batman Begins for the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to three months ended June 30, 2004.

26

Table of Contents

PC
Net revenue from PC-based products increased from $67 million in the three months ended June 30, 2004 to $74 million in the three months ended June 30, 2005. As a percentage of total net revenue, sales of PC products increased by 4.8 percent in the three months ended June 30, 2005. The increase in PC net revenue was primarily due to higher sales of products from our Battlefield franchise. We consolidated Digital Illusions C.E.’s (DICE) financial results into our financial statements as of January 27, 2005, and therefore, characterized Battlefield 2 as PC-based revenue. Prior to the consolidation of DICE, revenue from the Battlefield franchise was classified as co-publishing and distribution revenue. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in sales of products from our Harry Potter and The Sims franchises, as well as higher prior-year sales of UEFA Euro 2004.
Mobility
Net revenue from mobile products increased from $18 million in the three months ended June 30, 2004 to $52 million in the three months ended June 30, 2005. Mobile products include games for all mobile devices such as hand-helds and cellular handsets. As a percentage of total net revenue, sales of mobile products increased by 9.9 percentage points in the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to June 30, 2004. The increase in mobility net revenue was primarily due to the sales of titles for the Nintendo DS and PSP. The Nintendo DS and PSP were launched in certain regions during the six months ended March 31, 2005. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in net revenue from sales of products for the Game Boy Advance.
Co-Publishing and Distribution
Net revenue from co-publishing and distribution products decreased from $67 million in the three months ended June 30, 2004 to $30 million in the three months ended June 30, 2005. The decrease was primarily due to lower sales of products from our Battlefield franchise, which is now included in PC revenue due to our consolidation of DICE and higher prior year sales of various distribution titles.
Subscription Services
In the three months ended June 30, 2005, net revenue from subscription services products increased by $2 million to $15 million as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2004. The increase in net revenue was primarily due to an increase in the number of paying subscribers to Club Pogo, partially offset by a decrease in net revenue from The Sims OnlineTM and Earth & BeyondTM.
Licensing, Advertising and Other
In the three months ended June 30, 2005, net revenue from licensing, advertising and other products decreased by $9 million to $11 million as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2004. The decrease was primarily due to lower licensing revenue related to the Nokia N-Gage platform.
Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of goods sold for our disk-based and cartridge-based products consists of (1) product costs, (2) certain royalty expenses for celebrities, professional sports and other organizations and independent software developers, (3) manufacturing royalties, net of volume discounts, (4) expenses for defective products, (5) write-offs of post-launch prepaid royalty costs, (6) amortization of certain intangible assets and (7) operations expenses. Cost of goods sold for our online product subscription business consists primarily of data center and bandwidth costs associated with hosting our web sites, credit card fees and royalties for use of third-party properties. Cost of goods sold for our web site advertising business primarily consists of ad-serving costs.
Costs of goods sold for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were as follows (in millions):
             
June 30,
2005		 % of Net
Revenue		 June 30,
2004		 % of Net
Revenue		 % Change
 

$

151  41.2% $177  40.9% (15.0%)
 

27

Table of Contents

In the three months ended June 30, 2005, cost of goods sold as a percentage of total net revenue increased by 0.3 percentage points to 41.2 percent from 40.9 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2004. The 0.3 percentage point increase was primarily the result of a 2.7 percent increase in average product and operational costs, offset by lower average royalties. The increase in average product costs was driven primarily by higher anticipated returns in Europe due to a lower-than-expected demand for our products.
The increase in average product costs was partially offset by lower average royalty costs as a result of:
 • Lower license royalties as a percentage of total net revenue primarily due to a higher mix of products sold based on wholly-owned intellectual property during the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2004. We estimate that lower license royalties as a percentage of total net revenue increased gross margin by 2.9 percent.
 • Lower co-publishing and distribution royalties as a percentage of total net revenue due to the lower volume of co-publishing and distribution net revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2004. We estimate that lower co-publishing and distribution royalties as a percentage of total net revenue increased gross margin by 0.4 percent.
 • Partially offset by higher third-party development royalties as a percentage of total net revenue primarily due to a higher mix of externally developed titles versus internally developed titles in the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2004. We estimate that higher development royalties as a percentage of total net revenue decreased gross margin by 0.9 percent.
We expect cost of goods sold as a percentage of total net revenue to remain approximately flat during fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005. We expect margin pressure as a result of a potential decrease in average selling prices as current-generation platforms mature and our industry transitions to next-generation technology and higher license royalty rates. Although there can be no assurance, and our actual results could differ materially, we expect this pressure to be essentially offset by lower manufacturing royalty rates, lower third-party development royalties and, to some extent, favorable product mix.
Marketing and Sales
Marketing and sales expenses consist of personnel-related costs and advertising, marketing and promotional expenses, net of advertising expense reimbursements from third parties.
Marketing and sales expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were as follows (in millions):
                 
June 30,
2005		 % of Net
Revenue		 June 30,
2004		 % of Net
Revenue		 $ Change % Change
 
$

75

  20.6% $63  14.6% $12  19.0%
 
Marketing and sales expenses increased by 19 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2004 primarily due to:
 • An increase of $8 million in personnel-related costs resulting from an increase in headcount and facilities-related expenses in support of the growth of our marketing and sales functions worldwide.
 • An increase of $4 million in our marketing and advertising, promotional and related contracted services expenses primarily due to increased advertising in North America to support our current year releases.
We expect marketing and sales expenses for the twelve months ending March 31, 2006 to be consistent with the prior year as a percentage of net revenue.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses consist of personnel and related expenses of executive and administrative staff, fees for professional services such as legal and accounting, and allowances for bad debts.

28

Table of Contents

General and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were as follows (in millions):
                 
June 30,
2005		 % of Net
Revenue		 June 30,
2004		 % of Net
Revenue		 $ Change % Change
 
$

51

  14.0% $35  8.1% $16  45.1%
 
General and administrative expenses increased by 45 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2004 primarily due to:
 • An increase of $7 million in personnel and facility-related costs primarily due to an increase in headcount to help support the growth of our administrative functions worldwide.
 • An increase of $5 million in professional and contracted services to support our business.
We expect general and administrative expenses for the twelve months ending March 31, 2006 to be consistent with the prior year as a percentage of net revenue.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses consist of expenses incurred by our production studios for personnel-related costs, consulting, equipment depreciation and any impairment of prepaid royalties for pre-launch products. Research and development expenses for our online business include expenses incurred by our studios consisting of direct development and related overhead costs in connection with the development and production of our online games. Research and development expenses also include expenses associated with development of web site content, network infrastructure direct expenses, software licenses and maintenance, and network and management overhead.
Research and development expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were as follows (in millions):
                 
June 30,
2005		 % of Net
Revenue		 June 30,
2004		 % of Net
Revenue		 $ Change % Change
 
$

183

  50.1% $131  30.3% $52  39.9%
 
Research and development expenses increased by 40 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2004 primarily due to:
 • An increase of $49 million in personnel-related costs primarily related to (1) an increase in employee headcount in our Canadian and European studios as a result of increased internal development and the development of games for next-generation tools, technologies and titles, as well as our recent consolidations of DICE and Criterion and (2) the fact that there were 14 weeks in the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to only 13 weeks in the three months ended June 30, 2004.
 • An increase of $11 million in facilities-related expenses to help support the growth of our research and development functions worldwide, as well as the fact that there were 14 weeks in the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to only 13 weeks in the three months ended June 30, 2004.
These increases were partially offset by an overall decrease of approximately $9 million in external development expenses as a result of increased internal development.
We expect research and development spending to continue to increase in total dollars and as a percentage of net revenue for the remainder of fiscal 2006 as we continue to invest in next-generation tools, technologies and titles, products for new platforms, and, to a lesser extent, as we increase spending on titles for the PC and current-generation console products.
Interest and Other Income, Net
Interest and other income, net, for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were as follows (in millions):
                 
June 30,
2005		 % of Net
Revenue		 June 30,
2004		 % of Net
Revenue		 $ Change % Change
 
$

17

  4.6% $9  2.1% $8  84.7%
 

29

Table of Contents

Interest and other income, net, increased for the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2004 primarily due to an increase of $12 million in interest income as a result of higher yields on higher average cash balances, partially offset by a decrease of $3 million due to a net loss from our foreign currency activities.
Income Taxes
Income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were as follows (in millions):
             
June 30,
2005		 Effective
Tax Rate		 June 30,
2004		 Effective
Tax Rate		 % Change
 
$

(23)

  29.0% $10  29.0%  (330.1%)
 
Our effective income tax rate reflects our significant operations outside the U.S., which are generally taxed at rates lower than the U.S. statutory rate of 35 percent. Our effective income tax rates were 29.0 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the “Jobs Act”), enacted on October 22, 2004, provides for a temporary 85 percent dividends received deduction on certain foreign earnings repatriated in fiscal 2005 or fiscal 2006. The deduction would result in an approximate 5.25 percent federal tax on a portion of the foreign earnings repatriated. State, local and foreign taxes could apply as well. To qualify for this federal tax deduction, the earnings must be reinvested in the United States pursuant to a domestic reinvestment plan established by our Chief Executive Officer and approved by the Board of Directors. Certain other criteria in the Jobs Act must be satisfied as well. The maximum amount of our foreign earnings that we may repatriate subject to the Jobs Act deduction is $500 million.
We historically have considered undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries to be indefinitely reinvested and, accordingly, no U.S. taxes have been provided thereon. As a result of the Jobs Act, we are in the process of evaluating whether we will change our intentions regarding a portion of our foreign earnings and take advantage of the repatriation provisions of the Jobs Act, and if so, the amount that we would repatriate. We may not take advantage of the new law at all. In addition to not having made a decision to repatriate any foreign earnings, we are not yet in a position to accurately determine the impact of a qualifying repatriation, should we choose to make one, on our income tax expense for fiscal 2006. If we decide to repatriate a portion of our foreign earnings, we would be required to recognize income tax expense related to the federal, state, local and foreign taxes that we would incur on the repatriated earnings when the decision is made. We estimate that the reasonably possible amount of the income tax expense could be up to $35 million. We expect to be in a position to finalize our analysis no later than February 2006.
In July 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an exposure draft of a proposed interpretation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” which addresses the accounting for uncertain tax positions. The proposed interpretation provides that the best estimate of the impact of a tax position would be recognized in an entity’s financial statements only if it is probable that the position will be sustained on audit based solely on its technical merits. This proposed interpretation also would provide guidance on disclosure, accrual of interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods and transition. This proposed interpretation would be effective as of our quarter ending March 31, 2006. We cannot predict what actions the FASB will take or how any such actions might ultimately affect our financial position or results of operations.
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In March 2004, the FASB ratified the measurement and recognition guidance and certain disclosure requirements for impaired securities as described in Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 03-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments”. In June 2005, the FASB directed its staff to issue proposed FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) EITF 03-1-a, “Implementation Guidance for the Application of Paragraph 16 of EITF Issue No. 03-1,” as final. The FASB plans to retitle this FSP as FSP FAS 115-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments”. The final FSP will supersede EITF Issue No. 03-1 and EITF Topic D-44, “Recognition of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment upon the Planned Sale of a Security Whose Cost Exceeds Fair Value.” The final FSP will replace the guidance set forth in paragraphs 10 through 18 of EITF Issue No. 03-1 with references to existing other-than-temporary impairment guidance. FSP FAS 115-1 would be effective for other-than-temporary impairment analysis conducted in periods beginning after September 15, 2005. Management is currently evaluating what impact the adoption of the measurement and recognition guidance in FSP FAS 115-1 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

30

Table of Contents

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs — an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4”. SFAS No. 151 amends the guidance in Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing”, to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage) and requires that those items be recognized as current-period charges. SFAS No. 151 also requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Management believes the adoption of SFAS No. 151 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) (“SFAS No. 123R”), “Share-Based Payment”. SFAS No. 123R requires that the cost resulting from all share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements using a fair-value-based method. The statement replaces SFAS No. 123, supersedes Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) No. 25, and amends SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows”. While the fair value method under SFAS No. 123R is very similar to the fair value method under SFAS No. 123 with regards to measurement and recognition of stock-based compensation, management is currently evaluating the impact of several of the key differences between the two standards on our consolidated financial statements. For example, SFAS No. 123 permits us to recognize forfeitures as they occur while SFAS No. 123R will require us to estimate future forfeitures and adjust our estimate on a quarterly basis. SFAS No. 123R also will require a classification change in the statement of cash flows, whereby a portion of the tax benefit from stock options will move from operating cash flow activities to financing cash flow activities (total cash flows will remain unchanged).
In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) released SAB No. 107, “Share-based Payment”, which provides the views of the staff regarding the interaction between SFAS No. 123R and certain SEC rules and regulations for public companies. In April 2005, the SEC adopted a rule that amends the compliance dates of SFAS No. 123R. Under the revised compliance dates, we will be required to adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 123R no later than the first interim period of fiscal 2007. While management continues to evaluate the impact of SFAS No. 123R on our consolidated financial statements, we currently believe that the expensing of stock-based compensation will have an impact on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations similar to our pro forma disclosure under SFAS No. 123, as amended.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections—A Replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3”. SFAS No. 154 changes the requirements for the accounting and reporting of a change in accounting principle. Under previous guidance, changes in accounting principle were recognized as a cumulative affect in the net income of the period of the change. The new Statement requires retrospective application of changes in accounting principle, limited to the direct effects of the change, to prior periods’ financial statements, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. Additionally, this Statement requires that a change in depreciation, amortization or depletion method for long-lived, nonfinancial assets be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate effected by a change in accounting principle and that correction of errors in previously issued financial statements should be termed a “restatement.” SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and correction of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. Management does not believe the adoption of SFAS No. 154 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

31

Table of Contents

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
             
  As of June 30,    
(In millions) 2005  2004  Increase 

Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments

 $2,573  $2,369  $204 
Marketable equity securities
  176   2   174 
 
      
Total
 $2,749  $2,371  $378 
 
      

Percentage of total assets

  70.2%  70.4%    
             
  Three Months Ended    
  June 30,  Increase / 
(In millions) 2005  2004  (Decrease) 

Cash used in operating activities

 $(31) $(66) $35 
Cash used in investing activities
  (37)  (996)  959 
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities
  (318)  44   (362)
Effect of foreign exchange on cash and cash equivalents
  (10)  1   (11)
 
      
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
 $(396) $(1,017) $621 
 
      
Changes in Cash Flow
During the three months ended June 30, 2005, we used $31 million of cash from operating activities as compared to the use of $66 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. The decrease in cash used in operating activities resulted primarily from the collection of our receivables partially offset by the overall decline in net income for the first quarter of fiscal 2006 as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2005. We expect to generate significant operating cash flow during the remainder of fiscal 2006. For the three months ended June 30, 2005, our primary use of cash in non-operating activities consisted of $337 million for the repurchase and retirement of our common stock and $33 million in capital expenditures primarily related to the expansion of our Vancouver studio and upgrades to our worldwide ERP systems. We anticipate making continued capital investments in our Vancouver studio during fiscal 2006 as well as completing the remaining $372 million of our $750 million share repurchase program by September 30, 2005.
Short-term investments and marketable equity securities
As of June 30, 2005, 34 percent of our portfolio of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments consisted of cash and cash equivalents and 66 percent of our portfolio consisted of short-term investments. As of March 31, 2005, 43 percent of our portfolio consisted of cash and cash equivalents and 57 percent of our portfolio consisted of short-term investments. Due to our mix of fixed and variable rate securities, our short-term investment portfolio is susceptible to changes in short-term interest rates. As of June 30, 2005, our short-term investments had gross unrealized losses of approximately $15 million, or 0.9 percent of the total in short-term investments. From time to time, we may liquidate some or all of our short-term investments to fund operational needs or other activities, such as capital expenditures, business acquisitions or stock repurchase programs. Depending on the short-term investments that we liquidate to fund these activities, we could recognize a portion of the gross unrealized losses.
Marketable equity securities increased to $176 million as of June 30, 2005, from $140 million as of March 31, 2005, primarily due to an increase in the unrealized gain on our investment in Ubisoft Entertainment.
Receivables, net
Our gross accounts receivable balance was $278 million and $458 million as of June 30, 2005 and March 31, 2005, respectively. The decrease in our accounts receivable balance was due to lower sales volumes in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 as compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 and the collection of receivables from the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, which was expected as we traditionally have lower sales during our first fiscal quarter as compared to our fourth fiscal quarter. We expect our accounts receivable balance to increase during the three months ending September 30, 2005 based on our seasonal product release schedule. Reserves for sales returns, pricing allowances and doubtful accounts decreased from $162 million as of March 31, 2005 to $111 million as of June 30, 2005. As expected, principally due to the seasonality of our business, both sales returns and price protection reserves decreased in absolute dollars and as a percentage of trailing nine month net revenue and increased as a percentage of trailing six month net revenue as of June 30, 2005 as compared to March 31, 2005. Sales returns and price protection reserves as a percentage of six and nine month revenue remained relatively flat as compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2004. We believe these reserves are adequate based on historical experience and our current estimate of potential returns and allowances.

32

Table of Contents

Inventories
Inventories increased to $66 million as of June 30, 2005 from $62 million as of March 31, 2005 primarily due to the buildup of inventory in connection with the release of NCAA®Football 06 at the beginning of the second quarter of fiscal 2006. Other than NCAA Football 06, no single title represented more than $4 million of inventory as of June 30, 2005.
Other current assets
Other current assets increased to $194 million as of June 30, 2005, from $164 million as of March 31, 2005, primarily due to an increase in prepaid royalties as we continue to invest in our product development and content. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in our VAT receivable.
Accounts payable
Accounts payable decreased to $113 million as of June 30, 2005, from $134 million as of March 31, 2005, primarily due to the lower sales volume we experienced in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 as compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005.
Accrued and other liabilities
Our accrued and other liabilities decreased to $597 million as of June 30, 2005 from $694 million as of March 31, 2005. The decrease was due to decreases in accrued compensation and benefits, accrued income taxes and accrued royalties. We anticipate our accrued and other liabilities balance will increase during the three months ending September 30, 2005 primarily due to an increase in royalties payable.
Financial Condition
We believe that existing cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, marketable equity securities and cash generated from operations will be sufficient to meet our operating requirements for at least the next twelve months, including working capital requirements, capital expenditures, potential future acquisitions or strategic investments, and funding of our stock repurchase program. We may choose at any time to raise additional capital to strengthen our financial position, facilitate expansion, pursue strategic acquisitions and investments or to take advantage of business opportunities as they arise. There can be no guarantee that such additional capital will be available to us on favorable terms, if at all, or that it will not result in substantial dilution to our existing stockholders.
Our two lease agreements with Keybank National Association, described in the “Off-Balance Sheet Commitments” section below, are scheduled to expire in June 2006 and July 2006. We currently are evaluating whether to extend the leases, purchase the properties under lease, or identify a third party buyer for the properties when the leases expire. Should we choose to renew the leases, we would not expect a material change in our lease payments from the amounts under the current lease agreements. Should we choose to purchase the properties, we could incur a cash outflow of at least $200 million. We have not yet determined the course of action that we will take.
A portion of our cash that was generated from operations domiciled in foreign tax jurisdictions (approximately $905 million as of June 30, 2005) is designated as indefinitely reinvested in the respective tax jurisdiction. While we have no plans to repatriate these funds to the United States in the short term, if we were required to do so in order to fund our operations in the United States, we would accrue and pay additional taxes in connection with their repatriation. We are in the process of evaluating whether we will repatriate foreign earnings under the repatriation provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.
On October 18, 2004, our Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to an aggregate of $750 million of shares of our common stock. Pursuant to the authorization, we may repurchase shares of our common stock from time to time in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions over the course of a twelve-month period. During the three months ended June 30, 2005, we repurchased and retired 6.3 million shares of our common stock for approximately $337 million. From the inception of the program through June 30, 2005, we have repurchased and retired 7.1 million shares of our common stock for approximately $378 million.

33

Table of Contents

We have a “shelf” registration statement on Form S-3 on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This shelf registration statement, which includes a base prospectus, allows us at any time to offer any combination of securities described in the prospectus in one or more offerings up to a total amount of $2.0 billion. Unless otherwise specified in a prospectus supplement accompanying the base prospectus, we will use the net proceeds from the sale of any securities offered pursuant to the shelf registration statement for general corporate purposes, including for working capital, financing capital expenditures, research and development, marketing and distribution efforts and, if opportunities arise, for acquisitions or strategic alliances. Pending such uses, we may invest the net proceeds in interest-bearing securities. In addition, we may conduct concurrent or other financings at any time.
Our ability to maintain sufficient liquidity could be affected by various risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, those related to customer demand and acceptance of our titles on new platforms and new versions of our titles on existing platforms, our ability to collect our accounts receivable as they become due, successfully achieving our product release schedules and attaining our forecasted sales objectives, the impact of competition, the economic conditions in the domestic and international markets, seasonality in operating results, risks of product returns and the other risks described in the “Risk Factors” section below.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
Letters of Credit
In July 2002, we provided an irrevocable standby letter of credit to Nintendo of Europe. The standby letter of credit guarantees performance of our obligations to pay Nintendo of Europe for trade payables. The original letter of credit guaranteed our obligations to Nintendo of Europe of up to €18 million. In April 2005, we reduced the guarantee to €8 million. This standby letter of credit expired in July 2005 and was renewed through July 2006. As of June 30, 2005, we had less than €1 million payable to Nintendo of Europe covered by this standby letter of credit.
In August 2003, we provided an irrevocable standby letter of credit to 300 California Associates II, LLC in replacement of our security deposit for office space. The standby letter of credit guarantees performance of our obligations to pay our lease commitment up to approximately $1 million. The standby letter of credit expires in December 2006. As of June 30, 2005, we did not have a payable balance covered by this standby letter of credit.
Development, Celebrity, League and Content Licenses: Payments and Commitments
The products produced by our studios are designed and created by our employee designers, artists, software programmers and by non-employee software developers (“independent artists” or “third-party developers”). We typically advance development funds to the independent artists and third-party developers during development of our games, usually in installment payments made upon the completion of specified development milestones. Contractually, these payments are considered advances against subsequent royalties on the sales of the products. These terms are set forth in written agreements entered into with the independent artists and third-party developers. In addition, we have certain celebrity, league and content license contracts that contain minimum guarantee payments and marketing commitments that are not dependent on any deliverables. Celebrities and organizations with whom we have contracts include: ESPN (content in EA SPORTSTM games); FIFA and UEFA (professional soccer); NASCAR (stock car racing); John Madden (professional football); National Basketball Association (professional basketball); PGA TOUR (professional golf); Tiger Woods (professional golf); National Hockey League and NHLPA (professional hockey); Warner Bros. (Harry Potter, Batman and Superman); MGM/ Danjaq (James Bond); New Line Productions (The Lord of the Rings); Saul Zaentz Company (The Lord of the Rings); Marvel Enterprises (fighting); National Football League, Arena Football League and PLAYERS Inc. (professional football); Collegiate Licensing Company (collegiate football and basketball); ISC (stock car racing); Island Def Jam (fighting); and Viacom Consumer Products (The Godfather). These developer and content license commitments represent the sum of (i) the cash payments due under non-royalty-bearing licenses and services agreements, and (ii) the minimum payments and advances against royalties due under royalty-bearing licenses and services agreements, the majority of which are conditional upon performance by the counterparty. These minimum guarantee payments and any related marketing commitments are included in the table below.

34

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes our minimum contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of June 30, 2005, and the effect we expect them to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods (in millions):
                     
  Contractual Obligations  Commercial Commitment    
      Developer/           
Fiscal Year     Licensor      Bank and    
Ending March 31, Leases (1)  Commitments (2)  Marketing  Other Guarantees  Total 
2006 (remaining nine months)
 $34  $76  $34  $3  $147 
2007
  30   137   34   –   201 
2008
  23   125   30   –   178 
2009
  17   134   30   –   181 
2010
  13   121   31   –   165 
Thereafter
  35   830   197   –   1,062 
         
Total
 $152  $1,423  $356  $3  $1,934 
         

(1) See discussion on operating leases in the “Off-Balance Sheet Commitments” section below for additional information.

(2) Developer/licensor commitments include $44 million of commitments to developers or licensors that have been recorded in current and long-term liabilities and a corresponding amount in current and long-term assets in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2005 because the developer or licensor does not have any performance obligations to us.
The lease commitments disclosed above include contractual rental commitments of $21 million under real estate leases for unutilized office space due to our restructuring activities. These amounts, net of estimated future sub-lease income, were expensed in the periods of the related restructuring and are included in our accrued and other liabilities reported on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2005. See Note 5 in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET COMMITMENTS
Lease Commitments
We lease certain of our current facilities and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating lease agreements. We are required to pay property taxes, insurance and normal maintenance costs for certain of our facilities and will be required to pay any increases over the base year of these expenses on the remainder of our facilities.
In February 1995, we entered into a build-to-suit lease with a third party for our headquarters facility in Redwood City, California, which was refinanced with Keybank National Association in July 2001 and expires in July 2006. We accounted for this arrangement as an operating lease in accordance with SFAS No. 13, “Accounting for Leases”, as amended. Existing campus facilities developed in phase one comprise a total of 350,000 square feet and provide space for sales, marketing, administration and research and development functions. We have an option to purchase the property (land and facilities) for a maximum of $145 million or, at the end of the lease, to arrange for (i) an extension of the lease or (ii) sale of the property to a third party while we retain an obligation to the owner for approximately 90 percent of the difference between the sale price and the guaranteed residual value of up to $129 million if the sales price is less than this amount, subject to certain provisions of the lease.
In December 2000, we entered into a second build-to-suit lease with Keybank National Association for a five and one-half year term beginning December 2000 to expand our Redwood City, California headquarters facilities and develop adjacent property adding approximately 310,000 square feet to our campus. Construction was completed in June 2002. We accounted for this arrangement as an operating lease in accordance with SFAS No. 13, as amended. The facilities provide space for sales, marketing, administration and research and development functions. We have an option to purchase the property for a maximum of $130 million or, at the end of the lease, to arrange for (i) an extension of the lease or (ii) sale of the property to a third party while we retain an obligation to the owner for approximately 90 percent of the difference between the sale price and the guaranteed residual value of up to $119 million if the sales price is less than this amount, subject to certain provisions of the lease.

35

Table of Contents

We believe the estimated fair values of both properties under these operating leases are in excess of their respective guaranteed residual values as of June 30, 2005.
For the two lease agreements with Keybank National Association, as described above, the lease rates are based upon the LIBOR plus a margin and require us to maintain certain financial covenants as shown below, all of which we were in compliance with as of June 30, 2005.
             
          Actual as of 
Financial Covenants Requirement  June 30, 2005 

Consolidated Net Worth (in millions)

 equal to or greater than $2,061  $3,167 
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio
 equal to or greater than  3.00   15.77 
Total Consolidated Debt to Capital
 equal to or less than  60%   7.2% 
Quick Ratio – Q1 & Q2
 equal to or greater than  1.00   11.10 
Q3 & Q4
 equal to or greater than  1.75   N/A 
As our two lease agreements with Keybank National Association are scheduled to expire in June 2006 and July 2006, we currently are evaluating whether to extend the leases, purchase the properties under lease, or identify a third-party buyer for the properties when the leases expire. We have not yet determined the course of action that we will take. See the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section above for additional information.
  Litigation
On July 29, 2004, a class action lawsuit, Kirschenbaum v. Electronic Arts Inc., was filed against us in Superior Court in San Mateo, California. The complaint alleges that we improperly classified “Image Production Employees” in California as exempt employees and seeks injunctive relief, unspecified monetary damages, interest and attorneys’ fees. The complaint was first amended on or about November 30, 2004 to add two former employees as named-plaintiffs, and amended again on or about January 5, 2005 to add another former employee as a named-plaintiff. The allegations in the complaint were not materially changed by the amendments.
On February 14, 2005, a second employment-related class action lawsuit, Hasty v. Electronic Arts Inc., was filed against us in Superior Court in San Mateo, California. The complaint alleges that we improperly classified “Engineers” in California as exempt employees and seeks injunctive relief, unspecified monetary damages, interest and attorneys’ fees. On or about March 16, 2005, we received a first amended complaint, which contains the same material allegations as the original complaint. We answered the first amended complaint on April 20, 2005.
On March 24, 2005, a class action lawsuit was filed against us and certain of our officers and directors. The complaint, which asserts claims under Section 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 based on allegedly false and misleading statements, was filed in the United States District Court, Northern District of California, by an individual purporting to represent a class of purchasers of EA common stock. Additional class action lawsuits have been filed in the same court by other individuals asserting the same claims against us. On May 9, 2005, the court consolidated the complaints, and on June 13, 2005, the court appointed lead plaintiff and lead counsel pursuant to the requirements of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. An amended consolidated complaint has not yet been filed. Separately, on April 12, 2005, a shareholder derivative action was filed in San Mateo Superior Court against certain of our officers and directors. This suit asserts claims based on substantially the same factual allegations set forth in the federal class action lawsuits. Two other shareholder derivative actions have been filed in San Mateo Superior Court based on the same claims. Two of the three derivative actions have been consolidated; a request to consolidate the third is currently pending. In addition, two other shareholder derivative actions based on substantially the same allegations have been filed in the United States District Court, Northern District of California. We have not responded to any of the complaints.
In addition, we are subject to other claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. Our management considers that any liability from any reasonably foreseeable disposition of such other claims and litigation, individually or in the aggregate, would not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
  Director Indemnity Agreements
We have entered into indemnification agreements with the members of our Board of Directors to indemnify them to the extent permitted by law against any and all liabilities, costs, expenses, amounts paid in settlement and damages incurred by the directors as a result of any lawsuit, or any judicial, administrative or investigative proceeding in which the directors are sued as a result of their service as members of our Board of Directors.

36

Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS
Our business is subject to many risks and uncertainties, which may affect our future financial performance. If any of the events or circumstances described below occurs, our business and financial performance could be harmed, our actual results could differ materially from our expectations and the market value of our securities could decline. The risks and uncertainties discussed below are not the only ones we face. There may be additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently do not believe are material that may harm our business and financial performance.
Our business is highly dependent on the success and timely release of new video game platforms, on the continued availability of existing video game platforms, as well as our ability to develop commercially successful products for these platforms.
We derive most of our revenue from the sale of products for play on video game platforms manufactured by third parties, such as Sony’s PlayStation 2 and Microsoft’s Xbox. The success of our business is driven in large part by the availability of an adequate supply of current-generation video game platforms, the timely release, adequate supply, and success of new video game hardware systems, our ability to accurately predict which platforms will be most successful in the marketplace, and our ability to develop commercially successful products for these platforms. We must make product development decisions and commit significant resources well in advance of the anticipated introduction of a new platform. A new platform for which we are developing products may be delayed, may not succeed or may have a shorter life cycle than anticipated. If the platforms for which we are developing products are not released when anticipated, are not available in adequate amounts to meet consumer demand, or do not attain wide market acceptance, our revenue will suffer, we may be unable to fully recover the resources we have committed, and our financial performance will be harmed.
Our industry is cyclical and has entered a transition period heading into the next cycle. During the transition, we expect our costs to increase, we may experience a decline in sales as consumers anticipate and adopt next-generation products and our operating results may suffer and become more difficult to predict.
Video game platforms have historically had a life cycle of four to six years, which causes the video game software market to be cyclical as well. Sony’s PlayStation 2 was introduced in 2000 and Microsoft’s Xbox and the Nintendo GameCube were introduced in 2001. Beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2006 and continuing over the course of the next twelve to eighteen months thereafter, we expect Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo to introduce new video game platforms into the market (so-called “next-generation platforms”). As a result, we believe that the interactive entertainment industry has entered into a transition stage leading into the next cycle. During this transition, we intend to continue developing new titles for the current-generation of video game platforms while we also make significant investments preparing to introduce products upon the launch of the next-generation platforms. We have and expect to continue to incur increased costs during the transition to next-generation platforms, which are not likely to be offset in the near future. We also expect development costs for next-generation video games to be greater on a per-title basis than development costs for current-generation video games. Further, we expect that, as the current-generation of platforms reaches the end of its cycle and next-generation platforms are introduced into the market, sales of video games for current-generation consoles may begin to decline as consumers defer game software purchases until the next-generation platforms become available. This decline may not be offset by increased sales of products for the new platforms. For example, following the launch of Sony’s PlayStation 2 platform, we experienced a significant decline in revenue from sales of products for Sony’s older PlayStation game console, which was not immediately offset by revenue generated from sales of products for the PlayStation 2. If the increased costs we have incurred and expect to continue to incur are not offset during the transition, our operating results will suffer and our financial position will be harmed. In addition, during the transition, we expect our operating results to be more volatile and difficult to predict, which could cause our stock price to fluctuate significantly.
Our platform licensors set the royalty rates and other fees that we must pay to publish games for their platforms, and therefore have significant influence on our costs. If one or more of the platform licensors adopt a different fee structure for future game consoles or we are unable to obtain such licenses, our profitability will be materially impacted.
Beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2006 and continuing over the course of the next twelve to eighteen months thereafter, we expect our platform licensors to introduce new video game platforms into the market in various parts of the world. For example, Microsoft has announced plans to release the Xbox 360 (the next-generation successor to the Xbox) during the 2005 holiday season and Sony has announced plans to release the PlayStation 3 (the next-generation successor to the PlayStation 2) in the spring of 2006. In order to publish products for a new game machine, we must take a license from the platform licensor which gives the platform licensor the opportunity to set the fee structure that we must pay in order to publish games for that platform.

37

Table of Contents

Similarly, certain platform licensors have retained the flexibility to change their fee structures for online gameplay and features for their consoles. The control that platform licensors have over the fee structures for their future platforms and online access makes it difficult for us to predict our costs and profitability in the medium to long term. It is also possible that platform licensors may choose not to renew our licenses. Because publishing products for video game consoles is the largest portion of our business, any increase in fee structures or failure to secure a license relationship would significantly harm our ability to generate revenues and/or profits.
If we do not consistently meet our product development schedules, our operating results will be adversely affected.
Our business is highly seasonal, with the highest levels of consumer demand, and a significant percentage of our revenue, occurring in the December quarter. In addition, we seek to release many of our products in conjunction with specific events, such as the release of a related movie or the beginning of a sports season or major sporting event. If we miss these key selling periods, due to product delays or delayed introduction of a new platform for which we have developed products, our sales will suffer disproportionately. Our ability to meet product development schedules is affected by a number of factors, including the creative processes involved, the coordination of large and sometimes geographically dispersed development teams required by the increasing complexity of our products, and the need to refine and tune our products prior to their release. We have in the past experienced development delays for several of our products. Failure to meet anticipated production or “go live” schedules may cause a shortfall in our revenue and profitability and cause our operating results to be materially different from expectations.
If the average price of current-generation titles continues to decline, our operating results will suffer.
As a result of a more value-oriented consumer base caused by price reductions in current-generation platforms by Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo, a greater number of current-generation titles being published, and significant pricing pressure from our competitors, we have experienced a decrease in the average price of our titles for current-generation platforms. Although we believe that a few of the most popular current-generation titles will continue to be launched at premium price points, as the interactive entertainment industry transitions to next-generation platforms, we expect there to be fewer current-generation titles able to command premium price points, and we expect that even these titles will be subject to price reductions at an earlier point in their sales cycle than we have seen in prior years. We expect the average price of current-generation titles to continue to decline, which will have a negative effect on our margins and operating results.
Technology changes rapidly in our business, and if we fail to anticipate or successfully implement new technologies, the quality, timeliness and competitiveness of our products and services will suffer.
Rapid technology changes in our industry require us to anticipate, sometimes years in advance, which technologies we must implement and take advantage of in order to make our products and services competitive in the market. Therefore, we usually start our product development with a range of technical development goals that we hope to be able to achieve. We may not be able to achieve these goals, or our competition may be able to achieve them more quickly than we can. In either case, our products and services may be technologically inferior to our competitors’, less appealing to consumers, or both. If we cannot achieve our technology goals within the original development schedule of our products and services, then we may delay their release until these technology goals can be achieved, which may delay or reduce revenue and increase our development expenses. Alternatively, we may increase the resources employed in research and development in an attempt to accelerate our development of new technologies, either to preserve our product or service launch schedule or to keep up with our competition, which would increase our development expenses.
Our business is intensely competitive and “hit” driven. If we do not continue to deliver “hit” products or if consumers prefer our competitors’ products over our own, our operating results could suffer.
Competition in our industry is intense and we expect new competitors to continue to emerge. While many new products are regularly introduced, only a relatively small number of “hit” titles accounts for a significant portion of total net revenue in our industry. Hit products published by our competitors may take a larger share of consumer spending than we anticipate, which could cause our product sales to fall below our expectations. If our competitors develop more successful products, offer competitive products at lower price points, or if we do not continue to develop consistently high-quality and well-received products, our revenue, margins, and profitability will decline.

38

Table of Contents

If we are unable to maintain or acquire licenses to intellectual property, we will publish fewer hit titles and our revenue, profitability and cash flows will decline. Competition for these licenses may make them more expensive and increase our costs.
Many of our products are based on or incorporate intellectual property owned by others. For example, our EA SPORTS products include rights licensed from major sports leagues and players’ associations. Similarly, many of our other hit franchises, such as Bond, Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings, are based on key film and literary licenses. Competition for these licenses is intense. If we are unable to maintain these licenses or obtain additional licenses with significant commercial value, our revenues and profitability will decline significantly. Competition for these licenses may also drive up the advances, guarantees and royalties that we must pay to the licensor, which could significantly increase our costs.
If patent claims continue to be asserted against us, we may be unable to sustain our current business models or profits.
Many patents have been issued that may apply to widely-used game technologies. Additionally, infringement claims under many recently issued patents are now being asserted against Internet implementations of existing games. Several such claims have been asserted against us. Such claims can harm our business. We incur substantial expenses in evaluating and defending against such claims, regardless of the merits of the claims. In the event that there is a determination that we have infringed a third-party patent, we could incur significant monetary liability and be prevented from using the rights in the future, which could negatively impact our operating results.
Other intellectual property claims may increase our product costs or require us to cease selling affected products.
Many of our products include extremely realistic graphical images, and we expect that as technology continues to advance, images will become even more realistic. Some of the images and other content are based on real-world examples that may inadvertently infringe upon the intellectual property rights of others. Although we believe that we make reasonable efforts to ensure that our products do not violate the intellectual property rights of others, it is possible that third parties still may claim infringement. From time to time, we receive communications from third parties regarding such claims. Existing or future infringement claims against us, whether valid or not, may be time consuming and expensive to defend. Such claims or litigations could require us to stop selling the affected products, redesign those products to avoid infringement, or obtain a license, all of which would be costly and harm our business.
From time to time we may become involved in other litigation which could adversely affect us.
We are currently, and from time to time in the future may become, subject to other claims and litigation, which could be expensive, lengthy, and disruptive to normal business operations. In addition, the outcome of any claims or litigation may be difficult to predict and could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, or financial condition. For further information regarding certain claims and litigation in which we are currently involved, see “Part II — Item 1. Legal Proceedings” below.
Our business, our products and our distribution are subject to increasing regulation of content, consumer privacy, distribution and online delivery in the key territories in which we conduct business. If we do not successfully respond to these regulations, our business may suffer.
Legislation is continually being introduced that may affect both the content of our products and their distribution. For example, privacy laws in the United States and Europe impose various restrictions on our web sites. Those rules vary by territory although the Internet recognizes no geographical boundaries. Other countries, such as Germany, have adopted laws regulating content both in packaged goods and those transmitted over the Internet that are stricter than current United States laws. In the United States, the federal and several state governments are considering content restrictions on products such as ours, as well as restrictions on distribution of such products. For example, recent legislation has been proposed in several states, and could be proposed at the federal level, that would prohibit the sale of certain games (e.g., those with “M” or “AO” ratings) to minors. Any one or more of these factors could harm our business by limiting the products we are able to offer to our customers, by limiting the size of the potential market for our products, and by requiring additional differentiation between products for different territories to address varying regulations. This additional product differentiation would be costly.

39

Table of Contents

If one or more of our titles were found to contain hidden, objectionable content, our business could suffer.
Throughout the history of our industry, many videogames have been designed to include certain hidden content and gameplay features that are accessible through the use of in-game cheat codes or other technological means that are intended to enhance the gameplay experience. However, in several cases, the hidden content or feature was included in the game by an employee who was not authorized to do so or by an outside developer without the knowledge of the publisher. From time to time, some hidden content and features have contained profanity, graphic violence and sexually explicit or other objectionable material. In a few cases, the Entertainment Software Ratings Board (“ESRB”) has reacted to discoveries of hidden content and features by reviewing the rating that was originally assigned to the product, requiring the publisher to change the game packaging and/or fining the publisher. Retailers have on occasion reacted to the discovery of such hidden content by pulling these games from their shelves, refusing to sell them, and demanding that their publishers accept them as product returns. Likewise, consumers have reacted to the revelation of hidden content by refusing to purchase such games, demanding refunds for games they’ve already purchased, and refraining from buying other games published by the company whose game contained the objectionable material.
We have implemented preventative measures designed to reduce the possibility of hidden, objectionable content from appearing in the video games we publish. Nonetheless, these preventative measures are subject to human error, circumvention, overriding, and reasonable resource constraints. If a videogame we published were found to contain hidden, objectionable content, the ESRB could demand that we recall a game and change its packaging to reflect a revised rating, retailers could refuse to sell it and demand we accept the return of any unsold copies or returns from customers, and consumers could refuse to buy it or demand that we refund their money. This could have a material negative impact on our sales return allowances and associated reserves in a financial period. In addition, our reputation could be harmed, which could impact sales of other videogames we sell. If any of these consequences were to occur, our business and financial performance could be significantly harmed.
If we do not continue to attract and retain key personnel, we will be unable to effectively conduct our business. In addition, compensation-related changes in accounting requirements, as well as evolving legal and operational factors, could have a significant impact on our expenses and operating results.
The market for technical, creative, marketing and other personnel essential to the development and marketing of our products and management of our businesses is extremely competitive. Our leading position within the interactive entertainment industry makes us a prime target for recruiting of executives and key creative talent. If we cannot successfully recruit and retain the employees we need, or replace key employees following their departure, our ability to develop and manage our businesses will be impaired.
We annually review and evaluate with the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors the compensation and benefits that we offer our employees to ensure that we are able to attract and retain our talent. Within our regular review, we have considered recent changes in the accounting treatment of stock options, the competitive market for technical, creative, marketing and other personnel, and the evolving nature of job functions within our studios, marketing organizations and other areas of the business. Any changes we make to our compensation programs could result in increased expenses and have a significant impact on our operating results.
Our platform licensors are our chief competitors and frequently control the manufacturing of and/or access to our video game products. If they do not approve our products, we will be unable to ship to our customers.
Our agreements with hardware licensors (such as Sony for the PlayStation 2, Microsoft for the Xbox and Nintendo for the Nintendo GameCube) typically give significant control to the licensor over the approval and manufacturing of our products, which could, in certain circumstances, leave us unable to get our products approved, manufactured and shipped to customers. These hardware licensors are also our chief competitors. In most events, control of the approval and manufacturing process by the platform licensors increases both our manufacturing lead times and costs as compared to those we can achieve independently. While we believe that our relationships with our hardware licensors are currently good, the potential for these licensors to delay or refuse to approve or manufacture our products exists. Such occurrences would harm our business and our financial performance.
We also require compatibility code and the consent of Microsoft and Sony in order to include online capabilities in our products for their respective platforms. As online capabilities for video game platforms become more significant, Microsoft and Sony could restrict our ability to provide online capabilities for our console platform products. If Microsoft or Sony refused to approve our products with online capabilities or significantly impacted the financial terms on which these services are offered to our customers, our business could be harmed.

40

Table of Contents

Our international net revenue is subject to currency fluctuations.
For the three months ended June 30, 2005, international net revenue comprised 50 percent of our total net revenue. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, international net revenue comprised 47 percent of our total net revenue. We expect foreign sales to continue to account for a significant portion of our total net revenue. Such sales are subject to unexpected regulatory requirements, tariffs and other barriers. Additionally, foreign sales are primarily made in local currencies, which may fluctuate against the U.S. dollar. While we utilize foreign exchange forward contracts to mitigate some foreign currency risk associated with foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities (primarily certain intercompany receivables and payables) and from time to time, foreign currency option contracts to hedge foreign currency forecasted transactions (primarily related to a portion of the revenue generated by our operational subsidiaries), our results of operations, including our reported net revenue and net income, and financial condition would be adversely affected by unfavorable foreign currency fluctuations, particularly the Euro and Pound Sterling.
Changes in our tax rates or exposure to additional tax liabilities could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
We are subject to income taxes in the United States and in various foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes and, in the ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We are also required to estimate what our taxes will be in the future. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the estimate process is inherently uncertain, and our estimates are not binding on tax authorities. Our effective tax rate could be adversely affected by changes in our business, including the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in the elections we make, changes in applicable tax laws as well as other factors. Further, our tax determinations are regularly subject to audit by tax authorities and developments in those audits could adversely affect our income tax provision. Should our ultimate tax liability exceed our estimates, our income tax provision and net income could be materially affected.
We are also required to pay taxes other than income taxes, such as payroll, sales, use, value-added, net worth, property and goods and services taxes, in both the United States and various foreign jurisdictions. We are regularly under examination by tax authorities with respect to these non-income taxes. There can be no assurance that the outcomes from these examinations, changes in our business or changes in applicable tax rules will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
Changes in our worldwide operating structure could have adverse tax consequences.
We are in the process of examining our worldwide operating structure in light of changing tax laws, our current and anticipated business operations, and the pending expiration of an offshore advance pricing agreements with a foreign tax authority in December 2005 under which our current business operates. Certain changes that we are considering, or a failure to make certain other changes, to our operating structure would increase our tax expense.
In addition, while our current intention is to invest indefinitely our undistributed foreign earnings offshore, we are in the process of evaluating whether we will change our intentions regarding a portion of our foreign earnings and take advantage of the repatriation provision of the Jobs Act, and if so, the amount that we would intend to repatriate. We may decide not to take advantage of the new law at all. In addition to not having made a decision to repatriate any foreign earnings, we are not yet in a position to determine the impact of a qualifying repatriation, should we choose to make one, on our income tax expense for fiscal 2006.
Our reported financial results could be adversely affected by changes in financial accounting standards or by the application of existing or future accounting standards to our business as it evolves.
As a result of the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the review of accounting policies by the SEC and national and international accounting standards bodies, the frequency of accounting policy changes may accelerate. For example, the FASB has issued a new standard that will require us to adopt a different method of determining and accounting for the compensation expense of our employee stock options. This and other possible changes to accounting standards, could adversely affect our reported results of operations although not necessarily our cash flows. Further, accounting policies affecting software revenue recognition have been the subject of frequent interpretations, which could significantly affect the way we account for revenue related to our products. As we enhance, expand and diversify our business and product offerings, the application of existing or future financial accounting standards, particularly those relating to the way we account for revenue, could have a significant adverse effect on our reported results although not necessarily on our cash flows.

41

Table of Contents

The majority of our sales are made to a relatively small number of key customers. If these customers reduce their purchases of our products or become unable to pay for them, our business could be harmed.
In the quarter ended June 30, 2005, over 70 percent of our U.S. sales were made to six key customers, two of which have recently announced plans to merge. In Europe, our top ten customers accounted for approximately 35 percent of our sales in that territory during the three months ended June 30, 2005. Worldwide, we had direct sales to one customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., which represented approximately 12 percent of total net revenue in the three months ended June 30, 2005. Though our products are available to consumers through a variety of retailers, the concentration of our sales in one, or a few, large customers could lead to a short-term disruption in our sales if one or more of these customers significantly reduced their purchases or ceased to carry our products, and could make us more vulnerable to collection risk if one or more of these large customers became unable to pay for our products. Additionally, our receivables from these large customers increase significantly in the December quarter as they stock up for the holiday selling season. Also, having such a large portion of our total net revenue concentrated in a few customers reduces our negotiating leverage with these customers.
Acquisitions, investments and other strategic transactions could result in operating difficulties, dilution to our investors and other negative consequences.
We have evaluated, and expect to continue to evaluate, a wide array of potential strategic transactions, including (1) acquisitions of companies, businesses, intellectual properties, and other assets, and (2) investments in new interactive entertainment businesses (for example, online and mobile games). Any of these strategic transactions could be material to our financial condition and results of operations. Although we regularly search for opportunities to engage in strategic transactions, we may not be successful in identifying suitable opportunities. We may not be able to consummate potential acquisitions or investments or an acquisition or investment may not enhance our business or may decrease rather than increase our earnings. In addition, the process of integrating an acquired company or business, or successfully exploiting acquired intellectual property or other assets, could divert a significant amount of our management’s time and focus and may create unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures. Additional risks we face include:
 • The need to implement or remediate controls, procedures and policies appropriate for a public company in an acquired company that, prior to the acquisition, lacked these controls, procedures and policies,
 
 • Cultural challenges associated with integrating employees from an acquired company or business into our organization,
 
 • Retaining key employees from the businesses we acquire,
 
 • The need to integrate an acquired company’s accounting, management information, human resource and other administrative systems to permit effective management, and
 
 • To the extent that we engage in strategic transactions outside of the United States, we face additional risks, including risks related to integration of operations across different cultures and languages, currency risks and the particular economic, political and regulatory risks associated with specific countries.
Future acquisitions and investments could involve the issuance of our equity securities, potentially diluting our existing stockholders, the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities or amortization expenses, or write-offs of goodwill, any of which could harm our financial condition. Our stockholders may not have the opportunity to review, vote on or evaluate future acquisitions or investments.

42

Table of Contents

Our products are subject to the threat of piracy by a variety of organizations and individuals. If we are not successful in combating and preventing piracy, our sales and profitability could be harmed significantly.
In many countries around the world, more pirated copies of our products are sold than legitimate copies. Though we believe piracy has not had a material impact on our operating results to date, highly organized pirate operations have been expanding globally. In addition, the proliferation of technology designed to circumvent the protection measures we use in our products, the availability of broadband access to the Internet, the ability to download pirated copies of our games from various Internet sites, and the widespread proliferation of Internet cafes using pirated copies of our products, all have contributed to ongoing and expanding piracy. Though we take steps to make the unauthorized copying and distribution of our products more difficult, as do the manufacturers of consoles on which our games are played, neither our efforts nor those of the console manufacturers may be successful in controlling the piracy of our products. This could have a negative effect on our growth and profitability in the future.
Our stock price has been volatile and may continue to fluctuate significantly.
The market price of our common stock historically has been, and we expect will continue to be, subject to significant fluctuations. These fluctuations may be due to factors specific to us (including those discussed in the risk factors above as well as others not currently known to us or that we currently do not believe are material), to changes in securities analysts’ earnings estimates, to our results falling below the expectations of analysts and investors, to factors affecting the computer, software, Internet, entertainment, media or electronics industries, or to national or international economic conditions.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
MARKET RISK
We are exposed to various market risks, including changes in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates, and market prices. Market risk is the potential loss arising from changes in market rates and market prices. Foreign currency option and foreign exchange forward contracts are used to either hedge anticipated exposures or mitigate some existing exposures subject to market risk. We do not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Interest rate risk is the potential loss arising from changes in interest rates and credit ratings. We do not consider our cash and cash equivalents to be exposed to significant interest rate risk because our portfolio consists of highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
From time to time, we hedge some of our foreign currency risk related to anticipated foreign-currency-denominated sales transactions by purchasing option contracts that generally have maturities of 15 months or less. These transactions are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges. The derivative assets associated with our hedging activities are recorded at fair value in other current assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The effective portion of gains or losses resulting from changes in fair value is initially reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of any tax effects, in stockholders’ equity and subsequently reclassified into net revenue in the period when the forecasted transaction actually occurs. The ineffective portion of gains or losses resulting from changes in fair value is reported in interest and other income, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Our hedging programs reduce, but do not entirely eliminate, the impact of currency exchange rate movements. The fair value of our foreign currency option contracts purchased and included in other current assets was $9 million as of June 30, 2005.
We utilize foreign exchange forward contracts to mitigate foreign currency risk associated with foreign-currency-denominated assets and liabilities, primarily intercompany receivables and payables. The forward contracts generally have a contractual term of less than one month and are transacted near month-end. Therefore, the fair value of the forward contracts generally is not significant at each month-end. Our foreign exchange forward contracts are not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS No. 133 and are accounted for as derivatives whereby the fair value of the contracts are reported as other current assets or other current liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, and gains and losses from changes in fair value are reported in interest and other income, net, in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The gains and losses on these forward contracts generally offset the gains and losses on the underlying foreign-currency-denominated assets and liabilities.
As of June 30, 2005, we had foreign exchange contracts to purchase and sell approximately $248 million in foreign currencies. Of this amount, $222 million represents contracts to sell foreign currencies in exchange for U.S. dollars, $21 million to sell foreign currencies in exchange for British Pounds, and $5 million to purchase foreign currency in exchange for U.S. dollars. The fair value of our forward contracts was immaterial as of June 30, 2005.

43

Table of Contents

The counterparties to these forward and option contracts are creditworthy multinational commercial banks. The risks of counterparty nonperformance associated with these contracts are not considered to be material.
Notwithstanding our efforts to mitigate some foreign currency exchange rate risks, there can be no assurances that our mitigating activities will adequately protect us against the risks associated with foreign currency fluctuations. For example, a hypothetical adverse foreign currency exchange rate movement of 10 percent or 15 percent would result in a potential loss in fair value of our option contracts of $8 million and $9 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2005. A hypothetical adverse foreign currency exchange rate movement of 10 percent or 15 percent would result in potential losses on our forward contracts of $23 million and $34 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2005. This sensitivity analysis assumes a parallel adverse shift in foreign currency exchange rates, which do not always move in the same direction. Actual results may differ materially.
Interest Rate Risk
Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our short-term investment portfolio. We manage our interest rate risk by maintaining an investment portfolio generally consisting of debt instruments of high credit quality and relatively short average maturities. Additionally, the contractual terms of the securities do not permit the issuer to call, prepay or otherwise settle the securities at prices less than the stated par value of the securities. We also do not use derivative financial instruments in our short-term investment portfolio.
As of June 30, 2005 and March 31, 2005, our short-term investments were classified as available-for-sale and, consequently, recorded at fair market value with unrealized gains or losses resulting from changes in fair value reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of any tax effects, in stockholders’ equity. Our portfolio of short-term investments consisted of the following investment categories, summarized by fair value as of June 30, 2005 and March 31, 2005 (in millions):
         
  As of
June 30 		  As of
March 31		 
  2005  2005 
U.S. government agencies
 $1,158  $1,168 
U.S. government bonds
  339   298 
Corporate bonds
  181   180 
Asset-backed securities
  21   42 
 
      
Total short-term investments
 $1,699  $1,688 
 
      
Notwithstanding our efforts to manage interest rate risks, there can be no assurances that we will be adequately protected against risks associated with interest rate fluctuations. At any time, a sharp rise in interest rates could have a significant adverse impact on the fair value of our investment portfolio. The following table presents the hypothetical changes in fair value in our short-term investment portfolio as of June 30, 2005, arising from selected potential changes in interest rates. The modeling technique measures the change in fair value from immediate hypothetical parallel shifts in the yield curve of plus or minus 50 basis points (“BPS”), 100 BPS, and 150 BPS. Actual results may differ materially.
                             
              Fair Value    
  Valuation of Securities Given an Interest  as of  Valuation of Securities Given an Interest 
(In millions) Rate Decrease of X Basis Points  June 30,  Rate Increase of X Basis Points 
  (150 BPS)  (100 BPS)  (50 BPS)  2005  50 BPS  100 BPS  150 BPS 

U.S. government agencies

 $1,164  $1,163  $1,161  $1,158  $1,151  $1,146  $1,140 
U.S. government bonds
  347   345   342   339   336   333   330 
Corporate bonds
  186   184   183   181   180   178   177 
Asset-backed securities
  21   21   21   21   21   21   21 
 
                     
Total short-term investments
 $1,718  $1,713  $1,707  $1,699  $1,688  $1,678  $1,668 
 
                     

44

Table of Contents

Market Price Risk
The values of our equity investments in publicly traded companies are subject to market price volatility. As of June 30, 2005, our marketable equity securities were classified as available-for-sale and, consequently, were recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at fair market value with unrealized gains or losses reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of any tax effects, in stockholders’ equity. The fair value of our marketable equity securities was $176 million and $140 million as of June 30, 2005 and March 31, 2005, respectively.
At any time, a sharp decrease in market prices in our investments in marketable equity securities could have a significant adverse impact on the fair value of our investments. The following table presents the hypothetical changes in the fair value of our marketable equity securities as of June 30, 2005, arising from selected potential changes in market prices. The modeling technique measures the change in fair value from immediate hypothetical parallel shifts in market price plus or minus 25 percent, 50 percent and 75 percent. Hypothetical changes in market prices of the same magnitude would not have resulted in material changes in the fair value of our marketable equity securities and, accordingly, are not presented.
                             
  Valuation of Securities Given an X  Fair Value  Valuation of Securities Given an X 
  Percentage Decrease in Each Stock’s  as of  Percentage Increase in Each Stock’s 
(In millions) Market Price  June 30,  Market Price 
  (75%)  (50%)  (25%)  2005  25%  50%  75% 

Marketable Equity Securities

 $44  $88  $132  $176  $220  $263  $307 

45

Table of Contents

Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Definition and limitations of disclosure controls. Our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures are also designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management evaluates these controls and procedures on an ongoing basis.
There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures. These limitations include the possibility of human error, the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures and reasonable resource constraints. In addition, because we have designed our system of controls based on certain assumptions, which we believe are reasonable, about the likelihood of future events, our system of controls may not achieve its desired purpose under all possible future conditions. Accordingly, our disclosure controls and procedures provide reasonable assurance, but not absolute assurance, of achieving their objectives.
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, believe that as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in providing the requisite reasonable assurance that material information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding the required disclosure.
Changes in internal controls. During our last fiscal quarter, no changes occurred in our internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

46

Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
   
Item 1.
 Legal Proceedings
 
  
 
 On July 29, 2004, a class action lawsuit, Kirschenbaum v. Electronic Arts Inc., was filed against us in Superior Court in San Mateo, California. The complaint alleges that we improperly classified “Image Production Employees” in California as exempt employees and seeks injunctive relief, unspecified monetary damages, interest and attorneys’ fees. The complaint was first amended on or about November 30, 2004 to add two former employees as named-plaintiffs, and amended again on or about January 5, 2005 to add another former employee as a named-plaintiff. The allegations in the complaint were not materially changed by the amendments.
 
  
 
 On February 14, 2005, a second employment-related class action lawsuit, Hasty v. Electronic Arts Inc., was filed against us in Superior Court in San Mateo, California. The complaint alleges that we improperly classified “Engineers” in California as exempt employees and seeks injunctive relief, unspecified monetary damages, interest and attorneys’ fees. On or about March 16, 2005, we received a first amended complaint, which contains the same material allegations as the original complaint. We answered the first amended complaint on April 20, 2005.
 
  
 
 On March 24, 2005, a class action lawsuit was filed against us and certain of our officers and directors. The complaint, which asserts claims under Section 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 based on allegedly false and misleading statements, was filed in the United States District Court, Northern District of California, by an individual purporting to represent a class of purchasers of EA common stock. Additional class action lawsuits have been filed in the same court by other individuals asserting the same claims against us. On May 9, 2005, the court consolidated the complaints, and on June 13, 2005, the court appointed lead plaintiff and lead counsel pursuant to the requirements of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. An amended consolidated complaint has not yet been filed. Separately, on April 12, 2005, a shareholder derivative action was filed in San Mateo Superior Court against certain of our officers and directors. This suit asserts claims based on substantially the same factual allegations set forth in the federal class action lawsuits. Two other shareholder derivative actions have been filed in San Mateo Superior Court based on the same claims. Two of the three derivative actions have been consolidated; a request to consolidate the third is currently pending. In addition, two other shareholder derivative actions based on substantially the same allegations have been filed in the United States District Court, Northern District of California. We have not responded to any of the complaints.
 
  
 
 In addition, we are subject to other claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. Our management considers that any liability from any reasonably foreseeable disposition of such other claims and litigation, individually or in the aggregate, would not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
   
Item 2.
 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
 
  
 
 On October 18, 2004, our Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to an aggregate of $750 million of shares of our common stock. Pursuant to the authorization, we may repurchase shares of our common stock from time to time in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions over the course of a twelve-month period. The following table summarizes the number of shares repurchased for the three months ended June 30, 2005:
                 
          Total Number of  Maximum Dollar Value 
          Shares Purchased  of Shares that May Yet 
  Total Number      as Part of Publicly  Be Purchased Under the 
  of Shares  Average Price  Announced  Program 
Period Purchased  Paid per Share  Program  (in millions) 
April 1 – 30, 2005
  –   –   –  $709 

May 1 – 31, 2005

  5,076,300  $52.52   5,076,300  $443 

June 1 – 30, 2005

  1,218,003  $58.02   1,218,003  $372 

47

Table of Contents

     
Item 6.
 Exhibits  
 
    
  The following exhibits (other than exhibits 32.1 and 32.2, which are furnished with this report) are filed as part of this report:
 
    
 Exhibit  
 Number Title
 
    
 10.1 Guaranty, dated as of December 6, 2000, by Electronic Arts Inc. in favor of Selco Service Corporation, Victory Receivables Corporation, The Bank Of Tokyo-Mitsubushi, Ltd., various Liquidity Banks, and Keybank National Association.
 
    
 10.2 Guaranty, dated as of July 16, 2001, by Electronic Arts Inc. in favor of Flatirons Funding, Limited Partnership, Victory Receivables Corporation, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubushi, Ltd., various Liquidity Banks and Tranche B Banks, and KeyBank National Association.
 
    
 10.3 First Amendment to Participation Agreement, dated as of May 13, 2002, by and among Electronic Arts Redwood, Inc., Electronic Arts Inc., Flatirons Funding, Limited Partnership, Victory Receivables Corporation, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubushi, Ltd., various Liquidity Banks, KeyBank National Association, and The Bank of Nova Scotia.
 
    
 10.4 Omnibus Amendment Agreement (2001 transaction), dated as of September 15, 2004, Electronic Arts Redwood, LLC, Electronic Arts, Inc., Selco Service Corporation, Victory Receivables Corporation, The Bank Of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., various Liquidity Banks, and KeyBank National Association.
 
    
 10.5 Omnibus Amendment Agreement (2000 transaction), dated as of September 15, 2004, by and among Electronic Arts Redwood, LLC, Electronic Arts, Inc., Selco Service Corporation, Victory Receivables Corporation, The Bank Of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., various Liquidity Banks, and KeyBank National Association.
 
    
 10.6 Omnibus Amendment (2000 transaction), dated as of July 11, 2005, among Electronic Arts Redwood LLC, Electronic Arts Inc., Selco Service Corporation, Victory Receivables Corporation, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., New York Branch, various Liquidity Banks, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, and KeyBank National Association.
 
    
 10.7 Omnibus Amendment (2001 transaction), dated as of July 11, 2005, among Electronic Arts Redwood LLC, Electronic Arts Inc., Selco Service Corporation, Victory Receivables Corporation, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., New York Branch, various Liquidity Banks, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, The Bank of Nova Scotia, and KeyBank National Association.
 
    
 15.1 Awareness Letter of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
 
    
 31.1 Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
    
 31.2 Certification of Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
    
  Additional exhibits furnished with this report:
 
    
 32.1 Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
    
 32.2 Certification of Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

48

Table of Contents

SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
      
 ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.
(Registrant)
 		  
 
      /s/ Warren C. Jenson    
DATED: WARREN C. JENSON   
August 3, 2005 Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial and Administrative Officer 		 

49

Table of Contents

     
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2005
EXHIBIT INDEX
   
EXHIBIT  
NUMBER EXHIBIT TITLE

10.1

 

Guaranty, dated as of December 6, 2000, by Electronic Arts Inc. in favor of Selco Service
Corporation, Victory Receivables Corporation, The Bank Of Tokyo-Mitsubushi, Ltd., various
Liquidity Banks, and Keybank National Association.

10.2

 

Guaranty, dated as of July 16, 2001, by Electronic Arts Inc. in favor of Flatirons Funding, Limited
Partnership, Victory Receivables Corporation, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubushi, Ltd., various
Liquidity Banks and Tranche B Banks, and KeyBank National Association.

10.3

 

First Amendment to Participation Agreement, dated as of May 13, 2002, by and among Electronic
Arts Redwood, Inc., Electronic Arts Inc., Flatirons Funding, Limited Partnership, Victory
Receivables Corporation, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubushi, Ltd., various Liquidity Banks,
KeyBank National Association, and The Bank of Nova Scotia.

10.4

 

Omnibus Amendment Agreement (2001 transaction), dated as of September 15, 2004, Electronic
Arts Redwood, LLC, Electronic Arts, Inc., Selco Service Corporation, Victory Receivables
Corporation, The Bank Of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., various Liquidity Banks, and KeyBank
National Association.

10.5

 

Omnibus Amendment Agreement (2000 transaction), dated as of September 15, 2004, by and
among Electronic Arts Redwood, LLC, Electronic Arts, Inc., Selco Service Corporation, Victory
Receivables Corporation, The Bank Of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., various Liquidity Banks, and
KeyBank National Association.

10.6

 

Omnibus Amendment (2000 transaction), dated as of July 11, 2005, among Electronic Arts
Redwood LLC, Electronic Arts Inc., Selco Service Corporation, Victory Receivables Corporation,
The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., New York Branch, various Liquidity Banks, Deutsche Bank
Trust Company Americas, and KeyBank National Association.

10.7

 

Omnibus Amendment (2001 transaction), dated as of July 11, 2005, among Electronic Arts
Redwood LLC, Electronic Arts Inc., Selco Service Corporation, Victory Receivables Corporation,
The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., New York Branch, various Liquidity Banks, Deutsche Bank
Trust Company Americas, The Bank of Nova Scotia, and KeyBank National Association.

15.1

 

Awareness Letter of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

31.1

 

Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange
Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

 

Certification of Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.

  
Additional exhibits furnished with this report:

32.1

 

Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange
Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.

32.2

 

Certification of Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

50

What is the market capitalization of a company?

The market capitalization sometimes referred as Marketcap, is the value of a publicly listed company.
In most cases it can be easily calculated by multiplying the share price with the amount of outstanding shares.

DISCLAIMER

CompaniesMarketCap is not associated in any way with CoinMarketCap.com
Stock prices are delayed, the delay can range from a few minutes to several hours.
Company logos are from the CompaniesLogo.com logo database and belong to their respective copyright holders. Companies Marketcap displays them for editorial purposes only.

Contact

For inquiries or if you want to report a problem write to hello@8marketcap.com

Links

- Privacy policy

- Terms and conditions

© 2025 CompaniesMarketcap.com