Companies:
11,336
total market cap:
NZ$264.457 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ NZD
$
USD
๐บ๐ธ
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
Isabella Bank Corporation
ISBA
#8511
Rank
NZ$0.52 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
NZ$68.24
Share price
0.23%
Change (1 day)
N/A
Change (1 year)
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Stock Splits
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Annual Reports (10-K)
Isabella Bank Corporation
Quarterly Reports (10-Q)
Financial Year FY2013 Q2
Isabella Bank Corporation - 10-Q quarterly report FY2013 Q2
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
ý
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
For the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2013
or
¨
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
For the transition period from
to
Commission File Number:
0-18415
Isabella Bank Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Michigan
38-2830092
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
identification No.)
401 N. Main St, Mt. Pleasant, MI
48858
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip code)
(989) 772-9471
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
ý
Yes
¨
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
ý
Yes
¨
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company”, in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check One).
Large accelerated filer
¨
Accelerated filer
ý
Non-accelerated filer
¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
¨
Yes
ý
No
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Common Stock no par value,
7,711,460
as of
7/25/2013
Table of Contents
ISABELLA BANK CORPORATION
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
4
Item 1 Financial Statements
4
Item 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
38
Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
58
Item 4 Controls and Procedures
58
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
59
Item 1 Legal Proceedings
59
Item 1A Risk Factors
59
Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
59
Item 6 Exhibits
60
SIGNATURES
2
Table of Contents
Forward Looking Statements
This report contains certain forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We intend such forward looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and is included in this statement for purposes of these safe harbor provisions. Forward looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” or similar expressions. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on the operations and future prospects include, but are not limited to, changes in: interest rates, general economic conditions, monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. Government, including policies of the U.S. Treasury and the FRB, the quality or composition of the loan or investment portfolios, demand for loan products, fluctuation in the value of collateral securing our loan portfolio, deposit flows, competition, demand for financial services in our market area, and accounting principles, policies and guidelines. These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Further information concerning Isabella Bank Corporation and its business, including additional factors that could materially affect our financial results, is included in our filings with the SEC.
The acronyms and abbreviations identified below may be used throughout this 10-Q, or in our other filings. You may find it helpful to refer back to this page while reading this report.
AFS: Available-for-sale
GLB Act: Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999
ALLL: Allowance for loan and lease losses
IFRS: International Financial Reporting Standards
AOCI: Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
IRR: Interest Rate Risk
ASC: FASB Accounting Standards Codification
JOBS Act: Jumpstart our Business Startups Act
ASU: FASB Accounting Standards Update
LIBOR: London Interbank Offered Rate
ATM: Automated Teller Machine
Moody’s: Moody’s Investors Service, Inc
BHC Act: Bank Holding Company Act of 1956
N/A: Not applicable
CFPB: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
N/M: Not meaningful
CRA: Community Reinvestment Act
NASDAQ: NASDAQ Stock Market Index
DIF: Deposit Insurance Fund
NASDAQ Banks: NASDAQ Bank Stock Index
DIFS: Department of Insurance and Financial Services
NAV: Net asset value
Directors Plan: Isabella Bank Corporation and Related Companies Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors
NOW: Negotiable order of withdrawal
Dividend Reinvestment Plan: Isabella Bank Corporation Stockholder Dividend Reinvestment Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan
NSF: Non-sufficient funds
Dodd-Frank Act: Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010
OCI: Other comprehensive income (loss)
ESOP: Employee stock ownership plan
OMSRs: Originated mortgage servicing rights
Exchange Act: Securities Exchange Act of 1934
OREO: Other real estate owned
FASB: Financial Accounting Standards Board
OTC: Over-the-Counter
FDI Act: Federal Deposit Insurance Act
OTTI: Other-than-temporary impairment
FDIC: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
PBO: Projected Benefit Obligation
FFIEC: Federal Financial Institutions Examinations Council
PCAOB: Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
Fitch: Fitch Ratings
Rabbi Trust: A trust established to fund the Directors Plan
FRB: Federal Reserve Bank
SEC: U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission
FHLB: Federal Home Loan Bank
SOX: Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Freddie Mac: Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
S&P: Standard & Poor
FTE: Fully taxable equivalent
TDR: Troubled debt restructuring
GAAP: U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
XBRL: eXtensible Business Reporting Language
3
Table of Contents
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1 – Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(
Dollars in thousands
)
June 30
2013
December 31
2012
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and demand deposits due from banks
$
21,289
$
22,634
Interest bearing balances due from banks
77
2,286
Total cash and cash equivalents
21,366
24,920
Certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions
1,810
4,465
Trading securities
950
1,573
AFS securities (amortized cost of $499,891 in 2013 and $490,420 in 2012)
499,424
504,010
Mortgage loans AFS
743
3,633
Loans
Commercial
389,044
371,505
Agricultural
87,516
83,606
Residential real estate
293,158
284,148
Consumer
33,734
33,494
Total loans
803,452
772,753
Less allowance for loan and lease losses
11,700
11,936
Net loans
791,752
760,817
Premises and equipment
25,852
25,787
Corporate owned life insurance policies
24,101
22,773
Accrued interest receivable
5,232
5,227
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values
18,242
18,118
Goodwill and other intangible assets
46,418
46,532
Other assets
15,525
12,784
TOTAL ASSETS
$
1,451,415
$
1,430,639
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits
Noninterest bearing
$
139,942
$
143,735
NOW accounts
173,184
181,259
Certificates of deposit under $100 and other savings
468,094
455,546
Certificates of deposit over $100
240,204
237,127
Total deposits
1,021,424
1,017,667
Borrowed funds
262,460
241,001
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities
8,243
7,482
Total liabilities
1,292,127
1,266,150
Shareholders’ equity
Common stock — no par value 15,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding 7,703,589 shares (including 4,742 shares held in the Rabbi Trust) in 2013 and 7,671,846 shares (including 5,130 shares held in the Rabbi Trust) in 2012
137,321
136,580
Shares to be issued for deferred compensation obligations
3,871
3,734
Retained earnings
22,244
19,168
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(4,148
)
5,007
Total shareholders’ equity
159,288
164,489
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
$
1,451,415
$
1,430,639
See notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(
Dollars in thousands
except per share amounts
)
Three Months Ended
June 30
Six Months Ended
June 30
2013
2012
2013
2012
Interest income
Loans, including fees
$
10,280
$
10,849
$
20,610
$
21,789
AFS securities
Taxable
1,798
1,988
3,632
3,877
Nontaxable
1,244
1,216
2,478
2,420
Trading securities
9
22
23
64
Federal funds sold and other
109
113
225
242
Total interest income
13,440
14,188
26,968
28,392
Interest expense
Deposits
1,822
2,368
3,696
4,880
Borrowings
959
1,061
1,906
2,253
Total interest expense
2,781
3,429
5,602
7,133
Net interest income
10,659
10,759
21,366
21,259
Provision for loan losses
215
439
515
900
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
10,444
10,320
20,851
20,359
Noninterest income
Service charges and fees
1,747
1,628
3,291
3,257
Gain (loss) on sale of mortgage loans
249
279
607
658
Earnings on corporate owned life insurance policies
190
177
359
348
Gain (loss) on sale of AFS securities
—
—
99
1,003
Other
550
460
827
819
Total noninterest income
2,736
2,544
5,183
6,085
Noninterest expenses
Compensation and benefits
5,236
5,232
10,681
10,533
Furniture and equipment
1,192
1,170
2,381
2,260
Occupancy
641
599
1,306
1,240
AFS security impairment loss
Total other-than-temporary impairment loss
—
—
—
486
Portion of loss reported in other comprehensive income (loss)
—
—
—
(204
)
Net AFS security impairment loss
—
—
—
282
Other
2,255
2,187
4,147
4,446
Total noninterest expenses
9,324
9,188
18,515
18,761
Income before federal income tax expense
3,856
3,676
7,519
7,683
Federal income tax expense
643
672
1,219
1,445
NET INCOME
$
3,213
$
3,004
$
6,300
$
6,238
Earnings per share
Basic
$
0.42
$
0.40
$
0.82
$
0.82
Diluted
$
0.41
$
0.39
$
0.80
$
0.80
Cash dividends per basic share
$
0.21
$
0.20
$
0.42
$
0.40
See notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(
Dollars in thousands
)
Three Months Ended
June 30
Six Months Ended
June 30
2013
2012
2013
2012
Net income
$
3,213
$
3,004
$
6,300
$
6,238
Unrealized gains (losses) on AFS securities:
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period
(11,997
)
1,420
(13,958
)
2,219
Reclassification adjustment for net realized (gains) losses included in net income
—
—
(99
)
(1,003
)
Reclassification adjustment for impairment loss included in net income
—
—
—
282
Net unrealized gains (losses)
(11,997
)
1,420
(14,057
)
1,498
Tax effect (1)
3,979
(546
)
4,902
(27
)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
(8,018
)
874
(9,155
)
1,471
Comprehensive income (loss)
$
(4,805
)
$
3,878
$
(2,855
)
$
7,709
(1)
See “
Note 10 – Federal Income Taxes
” for tax effect reconciliation.
See notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(
Dollars in thousands
except per share amounts
)
Common
Stock Shares
Outstanding
Common
Stock
Shares to be
Issued for
Deferred
Compensation
Obligations
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Totals
Balance, January 1, 2012
7,589,226
$
134,734
$
4,524
$
13,036
$
2,489
$
154,783
Comprehensive income (loss)
—
—
—
6,238
1,471
7,709
Issuance of common stock
54,900
1,322
—
—
—
1,322
Common stock transferred from the Rabbi Trust to satisfy deferred compensation obligations
—
95
(95
)
—
—
—
Share-based payment awards under equity compensation plan
—
—
295
—
—
295
Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations
—
(225
)
—
—
—
(225
)
Common stock repurchased pursuant to publicly announced repurchase plan
(41,581
)
(995
)
—
—
—
(995
)
Cash dividends ($0.40 per share)
—
—
—
(3,034
)
—
(3,034
)
Balance, June 30, 2012
7,602,545
$
134,931
$
4,724
$
16,240
$
3,960
$
159,855
Balance, January 1, 2013
7,671,846
$
136,580
$
3,734
$
19,168
$
5,007
$
164,489
Comprehensive income (loss)
—
—
—
6,300
(9,155
)
(2,855
)
Issuance of common stock
77,568
1,900
—
—
—
1,900
Common stock transferred from the Rabbi Trust to satisfy deferred compensation obligations
—
121
(121
)
—
—
—
Share-based payment awards under equity compensation plan
—
—
258
—
—
258
Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations
—
(166
)
—
—
—
(166
)
Common stock repurchased pursuant to publicly announced repurchase plan
(45,825
)
(1,114
)
—
—
—
(1,114
)
Cash dividends ($0.42 per share)
—
—
—
(3,224
)
—
(3,224
)
Balance, June 30, 2013
7,703,589
$
137,321
$
3,871
$
22,244
$
(4,148
)
$
159,288
See notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(
Dollars in thousands
)
Six Months Ended
June 30
2013
2012
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
$
6,300
$
6,238
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operations:
Provision for loan losses
515
900
Impairment of foreclosed assets
92
17
Depreciation
1,249
1,195
Amortization and impairment of OMSRs
210
287
Amortization of acquisition intangibles
114
133
Net amortization of AFS securities
1,131
1,076
AFS security impairment loss
—
282
(Gain) loss on sale of AFS securities
(99
)
(1,003
)
Net unrealized (gains) losses on trading securities
18
32
Net gain on sale of mortgage loans
(607
)
(658
)
Net unrealized (gains) losses on borrowings measured at fair value
—
(33
)
Increase in cash value of corporate owned life insurance policies
(359
)
(348
)
Share-based payment awards under equity compensation plan
258
295
Origination of loans held-for-sale
(35,014
)
(46,386
)
Proceeds from loan sales
38,511
47,902
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities which provided (used) cash:
Trading securities
605
2,680
Accrued interest receivable
(5
)
631
Other assets
914
(1,132
)
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities
761
(161
)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
14,594
11,947
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Net change in certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions
2,655
2,044
Activity in AFS securities
Sales
9,857
24,241
Maturities and calls
46,780
37,922
Purchases
(67,140
)
(112,835
)
Loan principal originations, net
(32,185
)
(6,768
)
Proceeds from sales of foreclosed assets
1,556
647
Purchases of premises and equipment
(1,314
)
(1,298
)
Purchases of corporate owned life insurance policies
(1,092
)
—
Proceeds from redemption of corporate owned life insurance policies
123
—
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
(40,760
)
(56,047
)
8
Table of Contents
INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(continued)
(
Dollars in thousands
)
Six Months Ended
June 30
2013
2012
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Acceptances and withdrawals of deposits, net
3,757
20,664
Increase (decrease) in borrowed funds
21,459
18,029
Cash dividends paid on common stock
(3,224
)
(3,034
)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
1,900
1,322
Common stock repurchased
(1,114
)
(995
)
Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations
(166
)
(225
)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
22,612
35,761
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
(3,554
)
(8,339
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
24,920
28,590
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
21,366
$
20,251
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOWS INFORMATION:
Interest paid
$
5,667
$
7,291
Federal income taxes paid
702
836
SUPPLEMENTAL NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING INFORMATION:
Transfers of loans to foreclosed assets
$
735
$
1,150
See notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
9
Table of Contents
NOTES TO INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(
Dollars in thousands
except per share amounts
)
Note 1 – Basis of Presentation
As used in these notes as well as in
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
, references to “Isabella,” “we,” “our,” “us,” and similar terms refer to the consolidated entity consisting of
Isabella Bank Corporation
and its subsidiaries.
Isabella Bank Corporation
refers solely to the parent holding company, and
Isabella Bank
refers to
Isabella Bank Corporation
’s subsidiary,
Isabella Bank
.
The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In our opinion, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the
three and six
month
periods
ended
June 30, 2013
are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending
December 31, 2013
. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in our annual report for the year ended
December 31, 2012
.
Our accounting policies are materially the same as those discussed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our annual report for the year ended
December 31, 2012
.
Note 2 – Computation of Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share represents income available to common shareholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued. Potential common shares that may be issued relate solely to outstanding shares in the
Directors Plan
.
Earnings per common share have been computed based on the following:
Three Months Ended
June 30
Six Months Ended
June 30
2013
2012
2013
2012
Average number of common shares outstanding for basic calculation
7,701,042
7,592,668
7,689,092
7,593,462
Average potential effect of shares in the Directors Plan (1)
168,323
203,603
166,800
201,743
Average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate diluted earnings per common share
7,869,365
7,796,271
7,855,892
7,795,205
Net income
$
3,213
$
3,004
$
6,300
$
6,238
Earnings per share
Basic
$
0.42
$
0.40
$
0.82
$
0.82
Diluted
$
0.41
$
0.39
$
0.80
$
0.80
(1)
Exclusive of shares held in the
Rabbi Trust
Note 3 – Recently Adopted Accounting Standards Update
ASU No. 2013-02: “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income”
In February 2013, ASU No. 2013-02 amended ASC Topic 220, “Comprehensive Income” to require disclosures related to reclassifications out of AOCI in one place. The ASU also requires the disclosure of reclassifications out of AOCI by component. The new authoritative guidance was effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2012 and did not have a financial impact on the Corporation, but increased the level of disclosures related to AOCI (see "
Note 13 – Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
").
10
Table of Contents
Note 4 – Trading Securities
Trading securities, at fair value, consist of the following investments at:
June 30
2013
December 31
2012
States and political subdivisions
$
950
$
1,573
Included in net trading
losses
of
$18
during the first
six
months of 2013 were
$4
of net unrealized trading
losses
on securities that were held in our trading portfolio as of
June 30, 2013
. Included in net trading
losses
of
$32
during the first
six
months of
2012
were
$10
of net unrealized trading
losses
on securities that were held in our trading portfolio as of
June 30, 2012
.
Note 5 – AFS Securities
The amortized cost and fair value of
AFS securities
, with gross unrealized gains and losses, are as follows at:
June 30, 2013
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Government sponsored enterprises
$
25,184
$
16
$
951
$
24,249
States and political subdivisions
184,157
5,567
2,422
187,302
Auction rate money market preferred
3,200
—
257
2,943
Preferred stocks
6,800
66
307
6,559
Mortgage-backed securities
151,530
862
2,985
149,407
Collateralized mortgage obligations
129,020
1,445
1,501
128,964
Total
$
499,891
$
7,956
$
8,423
$
499,424
December 31, 2012
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Government sponsored enterprises
$
25,668
$
108
$
—
$
25,776
States and political subdivisions
174,118
9,190
565
182,743
Auction rate money market preferred
3,200
—
422
2,778
Preferred stocks
6,800
—
437
6,363
Mortgage-backed securities
152,256
3,199
110
155,345
Collateralized mortgage obligations
128,378
2,627
—
131,005
Total
$
490,420
$
15,124
$
1,534
$
504,010
11
Table of Contents
The amortized cost and fair value of
AFS securities
by contractual maturity at
June 30, 2013
are as follows:
Maturing
Securities with Variable Monthly Payments or Noncontractual Maturities
Due in
One Year
or Less
After One
Year But
Within
Five Years
After Five
Years But
Within
Ten Years
After
Ten Years
Total
Government sponsored enterprises
$
—
$
72
$
25,112
$
—
$
—
$
25,184
States and political subdivisions
9,925
35,019
92,688
46,525
—
184,157
Auction rate money market preferred
—
—
—
—
3,200
3,200
Preferred stocks
—
—
—
—
6,800
6,800
Mortgage-backed securities
—
—
—
—
151,530
151,530
Collateralized mortgage obligations
—
—
—
—
129,020
129,020
Total amortized cost
$
9,925
$
35,091
$
117,800
$
46,525
$
290,550
$
499,891
Fair value
$
9,998
$
36,221
$
119,783
$
45,549
$
287,873
$
499,424
Expected maturities for government sponsored enterprises and states and political subdivisions may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations.
As auction rate money market preferred and preferred stocks have continual call dates, they are not reported by a specific maturity group. Because of their variable monthly payments, mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are not reported by a specific maturity group.
A summary of the activity related to sales of
AFS securities
was as follows for the
three and six
month periods ended:
Three Months Ended
June 30
Six Months Ended
June 30
2013
2012
2013
2012
Proceeds from sales of AFS securities
$
—
$
—
$
9,857
$
24,241
Gross realized gains (losses)
$
—
$
—
$
99
$
1,003
Applicable income tax expense (benefit)
$
—
$
—
$
34
$
341
The cost basis used to determine the realized gains or losses of securities sold was the amortized cost of the individual investment security as of the trade date.
Information pertaining to
AFS securities
with gross unrealized losses at
June 30, 2013
and
December 31, 2012
aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position, follows:
June 30, 2013
Less Than Twelve Months
Twelve Months or More
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Total
Unrealized
Losses
Government sponsored enterprises
$
951
$
23,043
$
—
$
—
$
951
States and political subdivisions
1,901
39,297
521
2,090
2,422
Auction rate money market preferred
—
—
257
2,943
257
Preferred stocks
—
—
307
3,493
307
Mortgage-backed securities
2,985
93,842
—
—
2,985
Collateralized mortgage obligations
1,501
54,368
—
—
1,501
Total
$
7,338
$
210,550
$
1,085
$
8,526
$
8,423
Number of securities in an unrealized loss position:
155
6
161
12
Table of Contents
December 31, 2012
Less Than Twelve Months
Twelve Months or More
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Total
Unrealized
Losses
States and political subdivisions
$
80
$
5,019
$
485
$
2,352
$
565
Auction rate money market preferred
—
—
422
2,778
422
Preferred stocks
—
—
437
3,363
437
Mortgage-backed securities
110
25,499
—
—
110
Total
$
190
$
30,518
$
1,344
$
8,493
$
1,534
Number of securities in an unrealized loss position:
15
6
21
As of
June 30, 2013
and
December 31, 2012
, we conducted an analysis to determine whether any securities currently in an unrealized loss position should be
other-than-temporarily
impaired. Such analyses considered, among other factors, the following criteria:
•
Has the value of the investment declined more than what is deemed to be reasonable based on a risk and maturity adjusted discount rate?
•
Is the investment credit rating below investment grade?
•
Is it probable the issuer will be unable to pay the amount when due?
•
Is it more likely than not that we will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis?
•
Has the duration of the investment been extended?
During the three month period ended
March 31, 2012
, we had
one
state issued student loan auction rate AFS investment security (which is included in states and political subdivisions) that was downgraded by Moody’s from A3 to Caa3. As a result of this downgrade, we engaged the services of an independent investment valuation firm to estimate the amount of credit losses (if any) related to this particular issue as of
March 31, 2012
. The evaluation calculated a range of estimated credit losses utilizing
two
different bifurcation methods:
1)
Discounted Cash Flow Method
.
2)
Credit Yield Analysis Method
.
The two methods were then weighted, with a higher weighting applied to the
Discounted Cash Flow Method
, to determine the estimated credit related impairment. As a result of this analysis we recognized an
OTTI
of
$282
in earnings in the quarter ended
March 31, 2012
.
A summary of key valuation assumptions used in the aforementioned analysis as of
March 31, 2012
, follows:
Discounted Cash Flow Method
Ratings
Fitch
Not Rated
Moody’s
Caa3
S&P
A
Seniority
Senior
Discount rate
LIBOR + 6.35%
Credit Yield Analysis Method
Credit discount rate
LIBOR + 4.00%
Average observed discounts based on closed transactions
14.00%
To test for additional impairment of this security during the
three and six
months ended
June 30, 2013
, we obtained another investment valuation (from the same firm engaged to perform the initial valuation as of
March 31, 2012
) as of
June 30, 2013
. Based on our analysis,
no
additional
OTTI
was indicated as of
June 30, 2013
.
13
Table of Contents
The following table provides a
roll-forward
of credit related impairment recognized in earnings for the:
Three Months Ended June 30
Six Months Ended June 30
2013
2012
2013
2012
Balance at beginning of period
$
282
$
282
$
282
$
—
Additions to credit losses for which no previous OTTI was recognized
—
—
—
282
Balance at end of period
$
282
$
282
$
282
$
282
Based on our analysis using the above criteria, the fact that we have asserted that we do not have the intent to sell these securities in an unrealized loss position, and considering it is unlikely that we will have to sell the securities before recovery of their cost basis, we do not believe that the values of any other securities are
other-than-temporarily
impaired as of
June 30, 2013
, or
December 31, 2012
.
Note 6 – Loans and ALLL
We grant commercial, agricultural, residential real estate, and consumer loans to customers situated primarily in Clare, Gratiot, Isabella, Mecosta, Midland, Montcalm, and Saginaw counties in Michigan. The ability of the borrowers to honor their repayment obligations is often dependent upon the real estate, agricultural, light manufacturing, retail, gaming, tourism, higher education, and general economic conditions of this region. Substantially all of our consumer and residential real estate loans are secured by various items of property, while commercial loans are secured primarily by real estate, business assets, and personal guarantees; a portion of loans are unsecured.
Loans that we have the intent and ability to hold in our portfolio are reported at their outstanding principal balance adjusted for any
charge-offs
, the
ALLL
, and any deferred fees or costs. Interest income on loans is accrued over the term of the loan based on the principal amount outstanding. Loan origination fees and certain direct loan origination costs are capitalized and recognized as a component of interest income over the term of the loan using the level yield method.
The accrual of interest on commercial, agricultural, and residential real estate loans is typically discontinued at the time the loan is
90 days or more
past due unless the credit is
well-secured
and in the process of collection. Consumer loans are typically
charged-off
no later than
180 days
past due. Past due status is based on contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on
nonaccrual
or
charged-off
at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.
For loans that are placed on
nonaccrual
status or
charged-off
, all interest accrued in the current calendar year, but not collected, is reversed against interest income while interest accrued in prior calendar years, but not collected, is charged against the
ALLL
. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cash basis, until qualifying for return to accrual status. Loans are typically returned to accrual status after
six
months of continuous performance. For impaired loans not classified as
nonaccrual
, interest income continues to be accrued over the term of the loan based on the principal amount outstanding.
Commercial and agricultural loans include loans for commercial real estate, commercial operating loans, farmland and agricultural production, and states and political subdivisions. Repayment of these loans is often dependent upon the successful operation and management of a business. We minimize our risk by limiting the amount of credit exposure to any one borrower to
$12,500
. Borrowers with credit needs of more than
$12,500
are serviced through the use of loan participations with other commercial banks. Commercial and agricultural real estate loans generally require
loan-to-value
limits of less than
80%
. Depending upon the type of loan, past credit history, and current operating results, we may require the borrower to pledge accounts receivable, inventory, and property and equipment. Personal guarantees are generally required from the owners of closely held corporations, partnerships, and sole proprietorships. In addition, we require annual financial statements, prepare cash flow analyses, and review credit reports as deemed necessary.
We offer adjustable rate mortgages, fixed rate balloon mortgages, construction loans, and fixed rate mortgage loans which typically have amortization periods up to a maximum of 30 years. Fixed rate loans with an amortization of greater than
15 years
are generally sold upon origination to
Freddie Mac
. Fixed rate residential real estate loans with an amortization of
15 years
or less may be held in our portfolio, held for future sale, or sold upon origination. We consider the direction of interest rates, the sensitivity of our balance sheet to changes in interest rates, and overall loan demand to determine whether or not to sell these loans to
Freddie Mac
.
Our lending policies generally limit the maximum
loan-to-value
ratio on residential real estate loans to
95%
of the lower of the appraised value of the property or the purchase price, with the condition that private mortgage insurance is required on loans with
loan-to-value
ratios in excess of
80%
. Substantially all loans upon origination have a loan to value ratio of less than
80%
. Underwriting criteria for residential real estate loans include: evaluation of the borrower’s ability to make monthly payments,
14
Table of Contents
the value of the property securing the loan, ensuring the payment of principal, interest, taxes, and hazard insurance does not exceed
28%
of a borrower’s gross income, all debt servicing does not exceed
36%
of income, acceptable credit reports, verification of employment, income, and financial information. Appraisals are performed by independent appraisers and reviewed internally. All mortgage loan requests are reviewed by our mortgage loan committee or through a secondary market automated underwriting system; loans in excess of
$400
require the approval of our Internal Loan Committee, the Board of Directors’ Loan Committee, or the Board of Directors.
Consumer loans include automobile loans, secured and unsecured personal loans, and overdraft protection related loans. Loans are amortized generally for a period of up to 6 years. The underwriting emphasis is on a borrower’s perceived intent and ability to pay rather than collateral value.
No
consumer loans are sold to the secondary market.
The
ALLL
is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the
ALLL
when we believe the
uncollectability
of the loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the
ALLL
.
The
ALLL
is evaluated on a regular basis and is based upon a periodic review of the
collectability
of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral, and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
The primary factors behind the determination of the level of the
ALLL
are specific allocations for impaired loans, historical loss percentages, as well as unallocated components. Specific allocations for impaired loans are primarily determined based on the difference between the net realizable value of the loan’s underlying collateral or the net present value of the projected payment stream and our recorded investment. Historical loss allocations were calculated at the loan class and segment levels based on a migration analysis of the loan portfolio over the preceding
five
years. An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that we believe affect our estimate of probable losses based on qualitative factors. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.
A summary of changes in the
ALLL
and the recorded investment in loans by segments follows:
Allowance for Loan Losses
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
Commercial
Agricultural
Residential Real Estate
Consumer
Unallocated
Total
April 1, 2013
$
6,897
$
321
$
3,634
$
732
$
325
$
11,909
Loans charged-off
(234
)
—
(397
)
(88
)
—
(719
)
Recoveries
166
—
61
68
—
295
Provision for loan losses
(357
)
14
378
(65
)
245
215
June 30, 2013
$
6,472
$
335
$
3,676
$
647
$
570
$
11,700
Allowance for Loan Losses
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
Commercial
Agricultural
Residential Real Estate
Consumer
Unallocated
Total
January 1, 2013
$
6,862
$
407
$
3,627
$
666
$
374
$
11,936
Loans charged-off
(445
)
—
(587
)
(209
)
—
(1,241
)
Recoveries
223
—
114
153
—
490
Provision for loan losses
(168
)
(72
)
522
37
196
515
June 30, 2013
$
6,472
$
335
$
3,676
$
647
$
570
$
11,700
15
Table of Contents
Allowance for Loan Losses and Recorded Investment in Loans
June 30, 2013
Commercial
Agricultural
Residential Real Estate
Consumer
Unallocated
Total
ALLL
Individually evaluated for impairment
$
1,642
$
31
$
1,744
$
—
$
—
$
3,417
Collectively evaluated for impairment
4,830
304
1,932
647
570
8,283
Total
$
6,472
$
335
$
3,676
$
647
$
570
$
11,700
Loans
Individually evaluated for impairment
$
13,639
$
576
$
10,720
$
54
$
24,989
Collectively evaluated for impairment
375,405
86,940
282,438
33,680
778,463
Total
$
389,044
$
87,516
$
293,158
$
33,734
$
803,452
Allowance for Loan Losses
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
Commercial
Agricultural
Residential Real Estate
Consumer
Unallocated
Total
April 1, 2012
$
5,728
$
859
$
3,702
$
625
$
1,461
$
12,375
Loans charged-off
(237
)
—
(238
)
(146
)
—
(621
)
Recoveries
42
—
20
63
—
125
Provision for loan losses
475
(426
)
185
125
80
439
June 30, 2012
$
6,008
$
433
$
3,669
$
667
$
1,541
$
12,318
Allowance for Loan Losses
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
Commercial
Agricultural
Residential Real Estate
Consumer
Unallocated
Total
January 1, 2012
$
6,284
$
1,003
$
2,980
$
633
$
1,475
$
12,375
Loans charged-off
(686
)
—
(353
)
(237
)
—
(1,276
)
Recoveries
128
—
61
130
—
319
Provision for loan losses
282
(570
)
981
141
66
900
June 30, 2012
$
6,008
$
433
$
3,669
$
667
$
1,541
$
12,318
Allowance for Loan Losses and Recorded Investment in Loans
December 31, 2012
Commercial
Agricultural
Residential Real Estate
Consumer
Unallocated
Total
ALLL
Individually evaluated for impairment
$
2,050
$
91
$
1,796
$
—
$
—
$
3,937
Collectively evaluated for impairment
4,812
316
1,831
666
374
7,999
Total
$
6,862
$
407
$
3,627
$
666
$
374
$
11,936
Loans
Individually evaluated for impairment
$
14,456
$
723
$
10,704
$
75
$
25,958
Collectively evaluated for impairment
357,049
82,883
273,444
33,419
746,795
Total
$
371,505
$
83,606
$
284,148
$
33,494
$
772,753
16
Table of Contents
The following table displays the credit quality indicators for commercial and agricultural credit exposures based on internally assigned credit ratings as of:
June 30, 2013
Commercial
Agricultural
Real Estate
Other
Total
Real Estate
Other
Total
Rating
2 - High quality
$
21,836
$
16,358
$
38,194
$
3,523
$
3,273
$
6,796
3 - High satisfactory
94,390
40,835
135,225
24,305
14,758
39,063
4 - Low satisfactory
133,379
44,636
178,015
24,782
13,248
38,030
5 - Special mention
14,315
1,314
15,629
803
201
1,004
6 - Substandard
17,350
2,138
19,488
958
1,268
2,226
7 - Vulnerable
1,068
78
1,146
—
248
248
8 - Doubtful
1,327
20
1,347
—
149
149
Total
$
283,665
$
105,379
$
389,044
$
54,371
$
33,145
$
87,516
December 31, 2012
Commercial
Agricultural
Real Estate
Other
Total
Real Estate
Other
Total
Rating
2 - High quality
$
25,209
$
15,536
$
40,745
$
2,955
$
2,313
$
5,268
3 - High satisfactory
83,805
28,974
112,779
16,972
11,886
28,858
4 - Low satisfactory
127,423
45,143
172,566
27,291
15,437
42,728
5 - Special mention
16,046
1,692
17,738
1,008
3,191
4,199
6 - Substandard
20,029
2,224
22,253
1,167
1,217
2,384
7 - Vulnerable
1,512
2,294
3,806
—
—
—
8 - Doubtful
1,596
22
1,618
—
169
169
Total
$
275,620
$
95,885
$
371,505
$
49,393
$
34,213
$
83,606
Internally assigned risk ratings are reviewed, at a minimum, when loans are renewed or when management has knowledge of improvements or deterioration of the credit quality of individual credits. Descriptions of the internally assigned risk ratings for commercial and agricultural loans are as follows:
1.
EXCELLENT – Substantially Risk Free
Credit has strong financial condition and solid earnings history, characterized by:
•
High liquidity, strong cash flow, low leverage.
•
Unquestioned ability to meet all obligations when due.
•
Experienced management, with management succession in place.
•
Secured by cash.
2.
HIGH QUALITY – Limited Risk
Credit with sound financial condition and has a positive trend in earnings supplemented by:
•
Favorable liquidity and leverage ratios.
•
Ability to meet all obligations when due.
•
Management with successful track record.
•
Steady and satisfactory earnings history.
•
If loan is secured, collateral is of high quality and readily marketable.
•
Access to alternative financing.
•
Well defined primary and secondary source of repayment.
•
If supported by guaranty, the financial strength and liquidity of the guarantor(s) are clearly evident.
17
Table of Contents
3.
HIGH SATISFACTORY – Reasonable Risk
Credit with satisfactory financial condition and further characterized by:
•
Working capital adequate to support operations.
•
Cash flow sufficient to pay debts as scheduled.
•
Management experience and depth appear favorable.
•
Loan performing according to terms.
•
If loan is secured, collateral is acceptable and loan is fully protected.
4.
LOW SATISFACTORY – Acceptable Risk
Credit with bankable risks, although some signs of weaknesses are shown:
•
Would include most start-up businesses.
•
Occasional instances of trade slowness or repayment delinquency – may have been
10
-
30
days slow within the past year.
•
Management’s abilities are apparent, yet unproven.
•
Weakness in primary source of repayment with adequate secondary source of repayment.
•
Loan structure generally in accordance with policy.
•
If secured, loan collateral coverage is marginal.
•
Adequate cash flow to service debt, but coverage is low.
To be classified as less than satisfactory, only one of the following criteria must be met.
5.
SPECIAL MENTION – Criticized
Credit constitutes an undue and unwarranted credit risk but not to the point of justifying a classification of substandard. The credit risk may be relatively minor yet constitute an unwarranted risk in light of the circumstances surrounding a specific loan:
•
Downward trend in sales, profit levels, and margins.
•
Impaired working capital position.
•
Cash flow is strained in order to meet debt repayment.
•
Loan delinquency (
30
-
60
days) and overdrafts may occur.
•
Shrinking equity cushion.
•
Diminishing primary source of repayment and questionable secondary source.
•
Management abilities are questionable.
•
Weak industry conditions.
•
Litigation pending against the borrower.
•
Collateral or guaranty offers limited protection.
•
Negative debt service coverage, however the credit is well collateralized and payments are current.
6. SUBSTANDARD – Classified
Credit where the borrower’s current net worth, paying capacity, and value of the collateral pledged is inadequate. There is a distinct possibility that we will implement collection procedures if the loan deficiencies are not corrected. In addition, the following characteristics may apply:
•
Sustained losses have severely eroded the equity and cash flow.
•
Deteriorating liquidity.
•
Serious management problems or internal fraud.
•
Original repayment terms liberalized.
•
Likelihood of bankruptcy.
•
Inability to access other funding sources.
•
Reliance on secondary source of repayment.
•
Litigation filed against borrower.
•
Collateral provides little or no value.
•
Requires excessive attention of the loan officer.
•
Borrower is uncooperative with loan officer.
18
Table of Contents
7.
VULNERABLE – Classified
Credit is considered “Substandard” and warrants placing on nonaccrual. Risk of loss is being evaluated and exit strategy options are under review. Other characteristics that may apply:
•
Insufficient cash flow to service debt.
•
Minimal or no payments being received.
•
Limited options available to avoid the collection process.
•
Transition status, expect action will take place to collect loan without immediate progress being made.
8. DOUBTFUL – Workout
Credit has all the weaknesses inherent in a “Substandard” loan with the added characteristic that collection and/or liquidation is pending. The possibility of a loss is extremely high, but its classification as a loss is deferred until liquidation procedures are completed, or reasonably estimable. Other characteristics that may apply:
•
Normal operations are severely diminished or have ceased.
•
Seriously impaired cash flow.
•
Original repayment terms materially altered.
•
Secondary source of repayment is inadequate.
•
Survivability as a “going concern” is impossible.
•
Collection process has begun.
•
Bankruptcy petition has been filed.
•
Judgments have been filed.
•
Portion of the loan balance has been
charged-off
.
Our primary credit quality indicators for residential real estate and consumer loans is the individual loan’s past due aging. The following tables summarize the past due and current loans as of:
June 30, 2013
Accruing Interest
and Past Due:
Total Past Due and Nonaccrual
30-59
Days
60-89
Days
90 Days
or More
Nonaccrual
Current
Total
Commercial
Commercial real estate
$
1,224
$
490
$
—
$
1,806
$
3,520
$
280,145
$
283,665
Commercial other
403
113
192
78
786
104,593
105,379
Total commercial
1,627
603
192
1,884
4,306
384,738
389,044
Agricultural
Agricultural real estate
377
19
—
—
396
53,975
54,371
Agricultural other
—
12
—
248
260
32,885
33,145
Total agricultural
377
31
—
248
656
86,860
87,516
Residential real estate
Senior liens
2,461
462
316
1,427
4,666
234,597
239,263
Junior liens
199
29
—
71
299
14,220
14,519
Home equity lines of credit
90
25
—
—
115
39,261
39,376
Total residential real estate
2,750
516
316
1,498
5,080
288,078
293,158
Consumer
Secured
46
—
12
21
79
28,984
29,063
Unsecured
19
6
—
—
25
4,646
4,671
Total consumer
65
6
12
21
104
33,630
33,734
Total
$
4,819
$
1,156
$
520
$
3,651
$
10,146
$
793,306
$
803,452
19
Table of Contents
December 31, 2012
Accruing Interest
and Past Due:
Total Past Due and Nonaccrual
30-59
Days
60-89
Days
90 Days
or More
Nonaccrual
Current
Total
Commercial
Commercial real estate
$
1,304
$
161
$
63
$
2,544
$
4,072
$
271,548
$
275,620
Commercial other
606
—
40
2,294
2,940
92,945
95,885
Total commercial
1,910
161
103
4,838
7,012
364,493
371,505
Agricultural
Agricultural real estate
—
—
—
—
—
49,393
49,393
Agricultural other
90
—
—
169
259
33,954
34,213
Total agricultural
90
—
—
169
259
83,347
83,606
Residential real estate
Senior liens
2,000
346
320
2,064
4,730
223,532
228,262
Junior liens
232
—
—
50
282
16,207
16,489
Home equity lines of credit
237
—
—
182
419
38,978
39,397
Total residential real estate
2,469
346
320
2,296
5,431
278,717
284,148
Consumer
Secured
127
33
4
—
164
28,118
28,282
Unsecured
31
3
1
—
35
5,177
5,212
Total consumer
158
36
5
—
199
33,295
33,494
Total
$
4,627
$
543
$
428
$
7,303
$
12,901
$
759,852
$
772,753
Impaired Loans
Loans may be classified as impaired if they meet one or more of the following criteria:
1.
There has been a
charge-off
of its principal balance (in whole or in part),
2.
The loan has been classified as a
TDR
, or
3.
The loan is in
nonaccrual
status.
Impairment is measured on a
loan-by-loan
basis for commercial and agricultural loans by comparing the loan’s outstanding balance to the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral, less cost to sell, if the loan is collateral dependent. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Impairment is measured on a
loan-by-loan
basis for residential real estate and consumer loans by comparing the loan’s outstanding balance to the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate.
20
Table of Contents
We do not recognize interest income on impaired loans in
nonaccrual
status. For impaired loans not in
nonaccrual
status, interest income is recognized daily, as earned, according to the terms of the loan agreement. The following is a summary of information pertaining to impaired loans as of, and for the periods ended:
June 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
Outstanding Balance
Unpaid Principal Balance
Valuation Allowance
Outstanding Balance
Unpaid Principal Balance
Valuation Allowance
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance
Commercial real estate
$
6,919
$
7,420
$
1,578
$
7,295
$
7,536
$
1,653
Commercial other
1,468
1,468
64
2,140
2,140
397
Agricultural real estate
91
91
31
91
91
32
Agricultural other
—
—
—
420
420
59
Residential real estate senior liens
10,475
11,675
1,731
10,450
11,672
1,783
Residential real estate junior liens
71
109
13
72
118
13
Total impaired loans with a valuation allowance
$
19,024
$
20,763
$
3,417
$
20,468
$
21,977
$
3,937
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance
Commercial real estate
$
4,405
$
5,139
$
3,749
$
4,408
Commercial other
847
958
1,272
1,433
Agricultural real estate
132
132
—
—
Agricultural other
353
473
212
332
Home equity lines of credit
174
474
182
482
Consumer secured
54
54
75
84
Total impaired loans without a valuation allowance
$
5,965
$
7,230
$
5,490
$
6,739
Impaired loans
Commercial
$
13,639
$
14,985
$
1,642
$
14,456
$
15,517
$
2,050
Agricultural
576
696
31
723
843
91
Residential real estate
10,720
12,258
1,744
10,704
12,272
1,796
Consumer
54
54
—
75
84
—
Total impaired loans
$
24,989
$
27,993
$
3,417
$
25,958
$
28,716
$
3,937
21
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2013
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2013
Average Outstanding Balance
Interest Income Recognized
Average Outstanding Balance
Interest Income Recognized
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance
Commercial real estate
$
7,990
$
102
$
8,084
$
221
Commercial other
764
37
932
38
Agricultural real estate
91
1
124
4
Agricultural other
—
—
105
—
Residential real estate senior liens
10,466
110
10,460
209
Residential real estate junior liens
85
1
85
1
Total impaired loans with a valuation allowance
$
19,396
$
251
$
19,790
$
473
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance
Commercial real estate
$
3,954
$
85
$
3,790
$
158
Commercial other
1,020
19
1,126
59
Agricultural real estate
133
2
67
2
Agricultural other
458
(11
)
423
(4
)
Home equity lines of credit
179
5
181
9
Consumer secured
63
1
68
2
Total impaired loans without a valuation allowance
$
5,807
$
101
$
5,655
$
226
Impaired loans
Commercial
$
13,728
$
243
$
13,932
$
476
Agricultural
682
(8
)
719
2
Residential real estate
10,730
116
10,726
219
Consumer
63
1
68
2
Total impaired loans
$
25,203
$
352
$
25,445
$
699
22
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2012
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2012
Average Outstanding Balance
Interest Income Recognized
Average Outstanding Balance
Interest Income Recognized
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance
Commercial real estate
$
6,444
$
83
$
6,165
$
181
Commercial other
829
16
777
28
Agricultural real estate
—
—
—
—
Agricultural other
2,145
36
2,306
73
Residential real estate senior liens
7,862
92
7,706
175
Residential real estate junior liens
175
2
183
4
Total impaired loans with a valuation allowance
$
17,455
$
229
$
17,137
$
461
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance
Commercial real estate
$
6,789
$
112
$
7,299
$
179
Commercial other
2,249
34
1,777
65
Agricultural real estate
274
—
232
—
Agricultural other
607
3
595
7
Home equity lines of credit
195
4
197
8
Consumer secured
89
1
95
3
Total impaired loans without a valuation allowance
$
10,203
$
154
$
10,195
$
262
Impaired loans
Commercial
$
16,311
$
245
$
16,018
$
453
Agricultural
3,026
39
3,133
80
Residential real estate
8,232
98
8,086
187
Consumer
89
1
95
3
Total impaired loans
$
27,658
$
383
$
27,332
$
723
As of
June 30, 2013
and
December 31, 2012
, we had committed to advance
$61
and
$9
, respectively, in connection with impaired loans, which include
TDRs
.
Troubled Debt Restructurings
Loan modifications are considered to be
TDRs
when the modification includes terms outside of normal lending practices to a borrower who is experiencing financial difficulties.
Typical concessions granted include, but are not limited to:
1.
Agreeing to interest rates below prevailing market rates for debt with similar risk characteristics.
2.
Extending the amortization period beyond typical lending guidelines for debt with similar risk characteristics.
3.
Forbearance of principal.
4.
Forbearance of accrued interest.
To determine if a borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, we consider if:
1.
The borrower is currently in default on any of their debt.
2.
The borrower would likely default on any of their debt if the concession was not granted.
3.
The borrower’s cash flow was insufficient to service all of their debt if the concession was not granted.
4.
The borrower has declared, or is in the process of declaring, bankruptcy.
5.
The borrower is unlikely to continue as a going concern (if the entity is a business).
23
Table of Contents
The following is a summary of information pertaining to
TDRs
granted in the periods ended:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
Number of Loans
Pre-Modification Recorded Investment
Post-Modification Recorded Investment
Number of Loans
Pre-Modification Recorded Investment
Post-Modification Recorded Investment
Commercial other
7
$
3,153
$
2,957
7
$
3,153
$
2,957
Agricultural other
—
—
—
1
134
134
Residential real estate senior liens
7
635
635
15
1,435
1,418
Total
14
$
3,788
$
3,592
23
$
4,722
$
4,509
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
Number of Loans
Pre-Modification Recorded Investment
Post-Modification Recorded Investment
Number of Loans
Pre-Modification Recorded Investment
Post-Modification Recorded Investment
Commercial other
5
$
305
$
305
26
$
4,891
$
4,891
Agricultural other
—
—
—
6
561
561
Residential real estate senior liens
7
684
684
12
1,405
1,405
Total
12
$
989
$
989
44
$
6,857
$
6,857
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
Below Market Interest Rate
Below Market Interest Rate and Extension of Amortization Period
Below Market Interest Rate
Below Market Interest Rate and Extension of Amortization Period
Number of Loans
Pre-Modification Recorded Investment
Number of Loans
Pre-Modification Recorded Investment
Number of Loans
Pre-Modification Recorded Investment
Number of Loans
Pre-Modification Recorded Investment
Commercial other
3
$
1,357
4
$
1,796
3
$
1,357
4
$
1,796
Agricultural other
—
—
—
—
1
134
—
—
Residential real estate senior liens
4
414
3
221
7
625
8
810
Total
7
$
1,771
7
$
2,017
11
$
2,116
12
$
2,606
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
Below Market Interest Rate
Below Market Interest Rate and Extension of Amortization Period
Below Market Interest Rate
Below Market Interest Rate and Extension of Amortization Period
Number of Loans
Pre-Modification Recorded Investment
Number of Loans
Pre-Modification Recorded Investment
Number of Loans
Pre-Modification Recorded Investment
Number of Loans
Pre-Modification Recorded Investment
Commercial other
3
$
160
2
$
145
24
$
4,746
2
$
145
Agricultural other
—
—
—
—
6
561
—
—
Residential real estate senior liens
4
324
3
360
4
324
8
1,081
Total
7
$
484
5
$
505
34
$
5,631
10
$
1,226
We did not restructure any loans through the forbearance of principal or accrued interest in the
three and six
month periods ended
June 30, 2013
or
2012
.
Based on our historical loss experience, losses associated with
TDRs
are not significantly different than other impaired loans within the same loan segment. As such,
TDRs
, including
TDRs
that have been modified in the past
12 months
that subsequently defaulted, are analyzed in the same manner as other impaired loans within their respective loan segment.
We had no loans that defaulted in the
three and six
month periods ended
June 30, 2013
, which were modified within
12 months
prior to the default date.
24
Table of Contents
Following is a summary of loans that defaulted in the
three and six
month periods ended
June 30, 2012
, which were modified within
12 months
prior to the default date:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
Number of Loans
Pre-
Default
Recorded
Investment
Charge-Off
Recorded
Upon
Default
Post-
Default
Recorded
Investment
Number of Loans
Pre-
Default
Recorded
Investment
Charge-Off
Recorded
Upon
Default
Post-
Default
Recorded
Investment
Commercial other
2
$
50
$
25
$
25
3
$
132
$
67
$
65
Residential real estate senior liens
—
—
—
—
1
47
43
4
Consumer secured
1
8
8
—
1
8
8
—
Total
3
$
58
$
33
$
25
5
$
187
$
118
$
69
The following is a summary of
TDR
loan balances as of:
June 30
2013
December 31
2012
TDRs
$
20,857
$
19,355
Note 7 – Equity Securities Without Readily Determinable Fair Values
Included in equity securities without readily determinable fair values are restricted securities, which are carried at cost, and investments in unconsolidated entities accounted for under the equity method of accounting.
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values consist of the following as of:
June 30
2013
December 31
2012
FHLB Stock
$
8,100
$
7,850
Corporate Settlement Solutions, LLC
6,919
7,040
FRB Stock
1,879
1,879
Valley Financial Corporation
1,000
1,000
Other
344
349
Total
$
18,242
$
18,118
Note 8 – Borrowed Funds
Borrowed funds consist of the following obligations as of:
June 30
2013
December 31
2012
FHLB advances
$
162,000
$
152,000
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase without stated maturity dates
71,668
66,147
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase with stated maturity dates
16,292
16,284
Federal funds purchased
12,500
6,570
Total
$
262,460
$
241,001
The
FHLB
advances are collateralized by a blanket lien on all qualified 1-4 family residential real estate loans and certain mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations. Advances are also secured by our holdings of
FHLB
stock. As of
June 30, 2013
, we had the ability to borrow up to an additional
$91,951
, based on assets pledged as collateral. During the first quarter of 2013 and 2012, we reduced funding costs by modifying the term of
$30,000
and
$60,000
, respectively, of
FHLB
advances.
25
Table of Contents
The following table lists the maturity and weighted average interest rates of
FHLB
advances as of:
June 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
Amount
Rate
Amount
Rate
Fixed rate advances due 2013
$
10,000
0.33
%
$
—
—
%
Fixed rate advances due 2014
10,000
0.48
%
10,000
0.48
%
Fixed rate advances due 2015
32,000
0.84
%
42,000
1.12
%
Fixed rate advances due 2016
10,000
2.15
%
10,000
2.15
%
Fixed rate advances due 2017
30,000
1.95
%
40,000
2.15
%
Fixed rate advances due 2018
30,000
2.49
%
20,000
2.86
%
Fixed rate advances due 2019
20,000
3.11
%
20,000
3.73
%
Fixed rate advances due 2020
10,000
1.98
%
10,000
1.98
%
Fixed rate advances due 2023
10,000
3.90
%
—
—
%
Total
$
162,000
1.92
%
$
152,000
2.05
%
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are classified as secured borrowings. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase without stated maturity dates generally mature within
one
to
four
days from the transaction date. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are reflected at the amount of cash received in connection with the transaction. The securities underlying the agreements have a carrying value and a fair value of
$122,362
and
$143,322
at
June 30, 2013
and
December 31, 2012
, respectively. Such securities remain under our control. We may be required to provide additional collateral based on the fair value of underlying securities.
The following table provides a summary of
short-term
borrowings for the
three and six
month periods ended:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
Maximum Month End Balance
Average Balance
Weighted Average Interest Rate During the Period
Maximum Month End Balance
Average Balance
Weighted Average Interest Rate During the Period
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase without stated maturity dates
$
71,668
$
69,692
0.15
%
$
58,584
$
58,045
0.20
%
Federal funds purchased
13,700
6,022
0.57
%
17,900
7,025
0.47
%
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
Maximum Month End Balance
Average Balance
Weighted Average Interest Rate During the Period
Maximum Month End Balance
Average Balance
Weighted Average Interest Rate During the Period
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase without stated maturity dates
$
71,668
$
65,363
0.15
%
$
58,584
$
55,436
0.11
%
Federal funds purchased
13,700
3,646
0.56
%
17,900
3,552
0.23
%
We had pledged certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions, trading securities, AFS securities, and 1-4 family residential real estate loans in the following amounts at:
June 30
2013
December 31
2012
Pledged to secure borrowed funds
$
307,647
$
308,628
Pledged to secure repurchase agreements
122,362
143,322
Pledged for public deposits and for other purposes necessary or required by law
22,331
22,955
Total
$
452,340
$
474,905
We had
no
investment securities that are restricted to be pledged for specific purposes.
26
Table of Contents
Note 9 – Other Noninterest Expenses
A summary of expenses included in other
noninterest
expenses are as follows for the:
Three Months Ended
June 30
Six Months Ended
June 30
2013
2012
2013
2012
Marketing and community relations
$
432
$
535
$
674
$
1,029
FDIC insurance premiums
273
213
545
428
Directors fees
205
209
404
419
Audit and related fees
162
154
301
330
Education and travel
116
139
238
266
Postage and freight
94
94
193
195
Printing and supplies
99
110
185
219
Legal fees
120
81
180
143
Consulting fees
83
71
155
258
Other
671
581
1,272
1,159
Total other
$
2,255
$
2,187
$
4,147
$
4,446
Note 10 – Federal Income Taxes
The reconciliation of the provision for federal income taxes and the amount computed at the federal statutory tax rate of
34%
of income before federal income tax expense is as follows for the:
Three Months Ended
June 30
Six Months Ended
June 30
2013
2012
2013
2012
Income taxes at 34% statutory rate
$
1,311
$
1,250
$
2,556
$
2,612
Effect of nontaxable income
Interest income on tax exempt municipal securities
(400
)
(388
)
(801
)
(779
)
Earnings on corporate owned life insurance policies
(65
)
(60
)
(122
)
(118
)
Other
(222
)
(141
)
(450
)
(292
)
Total effect of nontaxable income
(687
)
(589
)
(1,373
)
(1,189
)
Effect of nondeductible expenses
19
11
36
22
Federal income tax expense
$
643
$
672
$
1,219
$
1,445
Included in
OCI
for the
three and six
month periods ended
June 30, 2013
and
2012
are changes in unrealized holding gains and losses related to auction rate money market preferred and preferred stocks. For federal income tax purposes, these securities are considered equity investments. As such,
no
deferred federal income taxes related to unrealized holding gains or losses are expected or recorded.
27
Table of Contents
A summary of
OCI
follows for the:
Three Months Ended June 30
2013
2012
Auction Rate Money Market Preferred and Preferred Stocks
All Other AFS Securities
Total
Auction Rate Money Market Preferred and Preferred Stocks
All Other AFS Securities
Total
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period
$
(363
)
$
(11,634
)
$
(11,997
)
$
(185
)
$
1,605
$
1,420
Reclassification adjustment for net realized (gains) losses included in net income
—
—
—
—
—
—
Reclassification adjustment for impairment loss included in net income
—
—
—
—
—
—
Net unrealized gains (losses)
(363
)
(11,634
)
(11,997
)
(185
)
1,605
1,420
Tax effect
—
3,979
3,979
—
(546
)
(546
)
Unrealized gains (losses), net of tax
$
(363
)
$
(7,655
)
$
(8,018
)
$
(185
)
$
1,059
$
874
Six Months Ended June 30
2013
2012
Auction Rate Money Market Preferred and Preferred Stocks
All Other AFS Securities
Total
Auction Rate Money Market Preferred and Preferred Stocks
All Other AFS Securities
Total
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period
$
295
$
(14,253
)
$
(13,958
)
$
1,419
$
800
$
2,219
Reclassification adjustment for net realized (gains) losses included in net income
—
(99
)
(99
)
—
(1,003
)
(1,003
)
Reclassification adjustment for impairment loss included in net income
—
—
—
—
282
282
Net unrealized gains (losses)
295
(14,352
)
(14,057
)
1,419
79
1,498
Tax effect
—
4,902
4,902
—
(27
)
(27
)
Unrealized gains (losses), net of tax
$
295
$
(9,450
)
$
(9,155
)
$
1,419
$
52
$
1,471
Note 11 – Defined Benefit Pension Plan
We maintain a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan, which was curtailed effective
March 1, 2007
. As a result of the curtailment, future salary increases are no longer considered and plan benefits are based on years of service and the individual employee’s five highest consecutive years of compensation out of the last ten years of service through
March 1, 2007
. We contributed
$215
and
$709
to the plan during the
six
month periods ended
June 30, 2013
and
2012
, respectively. We do not anticipate any further contributions to the plan in
2013
.
28
Table of Contents
Following are the components of net periodic benefit cost for the
three and six
month periods ended:
Three Months Ended
June 30
Six Months Ended
June 30
2013
2012
2013
2012
Interest cost on PBO
$
112
$
117
$
225
$
235
Expected return on plan assets
(144
)
(127
)
(287
)
(254
)
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial net loss
82
73
165
146
Net periodic benefit cost
$
50
$
63
$
103
$
127
Note 12 – Fair Value
Following is a description of the valuation methodologies, key inputs, and an indication of the level of the fair value hierarchy in which the assets or liabilities are classified.
Cash and cash equivalents
:
The carrying amounts of cash and short term investments, including Federal funds sold, approximate fair values. As such, we classify cash and demand deposits due from banks as Level 1.
Certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions
:
Interest bearing balances held in unaffiliated financial institutions include certificates of deposit and other short term interest bearing balances that mature within
3 years
. Fair value is determined using prices for similar assets with similar characteristics. As such, we classify certificates of deposits held in other financial institutions as Level 2.
AFS and trading securities:
AFS and trading securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Level 1 fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments. Level 2 fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security’s credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss and liquidity assumptions. The values for Level 1 and Level 2 investment securities are generally obtained from an independent third party. On a quarterly basis, we compare the values provided to alternative pricing sources.
Mortgage loans AFS
:
Mortgage loans AFS
are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. The fair value of
Mortgage loans AFS
are based on what price secondary markets are currently offering for portfolios with similar characteristics. As such, we classify
Mortgage loans AFS
subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 2.
Loans
:
For variable rate loans with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. Fair values for fixed rate loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. The resulting amounts are adjusted to estimate the effect of changes in the credit quality of borrowers since the loans were originated. As such, we classify loans as Level 3 assets.
We do not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from
time-to-time
, loans are classified as impaired and a specific allowance for loan losses may be established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will be significantly different than the contractual terms of the original loan agreement are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as impaired, we measure the estimated impairment. The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise value, liquidation value, or discounted cash flows. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans.
We review the net realizable values of the underlying collateral for collateral dependent impaired loans on at least a quarterly basis for all loan types. To determine the collateral value, we utilize independent appraisals, broker price opinions, or internal evaluations. We review these valuations to determine whether an additional discount should be applied given the age of market information that may have been considered as well as other factors such as costs to carry and sell an asset if it is determined that the collateral will be liquidated in connection with the ultimate settlement of the loan. We use these valuations to determine if any
charge-offs
or specific reserves are necessary. We may obtain new valuations in certain circumstances, including when there has been significant deterioration in the condition of the collateral, if the foreclosure process has begun, or if the existing valuation is deemed to be outdated. Due to the inherent level of estimation in the valuation process, we record impaired loans as nonrecurring Level 3.
29
Table of Contents
The table below lists the quantitative information about impaired loans measured utilizing Level 3 fair value measurements as of:
June 30, 2013
Valuation Techniques
Fair Value
Unobservable Input
Range
Discounted cash flow
$8,802
Duration of cash flows:
8-120 Months
Reduction in interest rate from original loan terms:
5.00% - 6.63%
Discount applied to collateral appraisal:
Real Estate
20% - 30%
Equipment
50%
Discounted appraisal value
$12,770
Livestock
50%
Cash crop inventory
50%
Other inventory
75%
Accounts receivable
75%
December 31, 2012
Valuation Techniques
Fair Value
Unobservable Input
Range
Discounted cash flow
$8,726
Duration of cash flows:
14-120 Months
Reduction in interest rate from original loan terms:
5.00% - 6.25%
Discount applied to collateral appraisal:
Real Estate
20% - 30%
Equipment
50%
Discounted appraisal value
$13,295
Livestock
50%
Cash crop inventory
50%
Other inventory
75%
Accounts receivable
75%
Accrued interest receivable
:
The carrying amounts of accrued interest receivable approximate fair value. As such, we classify accrued interest receivable as Level 1.
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values
:
Included in equity securities without readily determinable fair values are
FHLB
Stock and
FRB
Stock as well as our ownership interests in
Corporate Settlement Solutions, LLC
and
Valley Financial Corporation
. The investment in
Corporate Settlement Solutions, LLC
, a title insurance company, was made in the first quarter 2007. We are not the managing entity of
Corporate Settlement Solutions, LLC
, and therefore, we account for our investment under the equity method of accounting.
Valley Financial Corporation
is the parent company of 1st State Bank in Saginaw, Michigan, which is a de novo bank that opened in 2005. We made investments in
Valley Financial Corporation
in 2004 and in 2007.
The lack of an active market, or other independent sources to validate fair value estimates coupled with the impact of future capital calls and transfer restrictions, is an inherent limitation in the valuation process. As the fair values of these investments are not readily determinable, they are not disclosed under a specific fair value hierarchy; however, they are reviewed quarterly for impairment. If we were to record an impairment adjustment related to these securities, it would be classified as a nonrecurring Level 3 fair value adjustment. During
2013
and
2012
, there were
no
impairments recorded on equity securities without readily determinable fair values.
Foreclosed assets
: Upon transfer from the loan portfolio, foreclosed assets (which are included in other assets) are adjusted to and subsequently carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. Net realizable value is based upon independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral, or management’s estimation of the value of the collateral. Due to the inherent level of estimation in the valuation process, we record foreclosed assets as nonrecurring Level 3.
30
Table of Contents
The table below lists the quantitative information related to foreclosed assets measured utilizing Level 3 fair value measurements as of:
June 30, 2013
Valuation Techniques
Fair Value
Unobservable Input
Range
Discount applied to collateral appraisal:
Discounted appraisal value
$
1,105
Real Estate
20% - 30%
December 31, 2012
Valuation Techniques
Fair Value
Unobservable Input
Range
Discount applied to collateral appraisal:
Discounted appraisal value
$
2,018
Real Estate
20% - 30%
Goodwill and other intangible assets
:
Acquisition intangibles and goodwill are evaluated for potential impairment on at least an annual basis. Acquisition intangibles and goodwill are typically qualitatively evaluated to determine if it is more likely than not that the carrying balance is impaired. If it is determined that the carrying balance of acquisition intangibles or goodwill is more likely than not to be impaired, we perform a cash flow valuation to determine the extent of the potential impairment. If the testing resulted in impairment, we would classify goodwill and other acquisition intangibles subjected to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 3. During
2013
and
2012
, there were
no
impairments recorded on goodwill and other acquisition intangibles.
OMSRs
:
OMSRs
(which are included in other assets) are subject to impairment testing. To test for impairment, we utilize a discounted cash flow analysis using interest rates and prepayment speed assumptions currently quoted for comparable instruments and discount rates. If the valuation model reflects a value less than the carrying value,
OMSRs
are adjusted to fair value through a valuation allowance as determined by the model. As such, we classify
OMSRs
subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 2.
Deposits
:
The fair value of demand, savings, and money market deposits are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts), and are classified as Level 1. Fair values for variable rate certificates of deposit approximate their recorded carrying value. Fair values for fixed rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits. As such, fixed rate certificates of deposit are classified as Level 2.
Borrowed funds
:
The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased, borrowings under overnight repurchase agreements, and other
short-term
borrowings maturing within
ninety days
approximate their fair values. The fair values of other borrowed funds are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on current incremental borrowing arrangements. As such, borrowed funds are classified as Level 2.
Accrued interest payable:
The carrying amounts of accrued interest payable approximate fair value. As such, we classify accrued interest payable as Level 1.
Commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit, and undisbursed loans:
Our commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit, and undisbursed funds have no carrying amount and are estimated to have no realizable fair value. Historically, a majority of the unused commitments to extend credit have not been drawn upon and, generally, we do not receive fees in connection with these commitments other than standby letter of credit fees, which are not significant.
The preceding methods described may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Although we believe our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement.
Estimated Fair Values of Financial Instruments Not Recorded at Fair Value in their Entirety on a Recurring Basis
Disclosure of the estimated fair values of financial instruments, which differ from carrying values, often requires the use of estimates. In cases where quoted market values in an active market are not available, we use present value techniques and other valuation methods to estimate the fair values of our financial instruments. These valuation methods require considerable judgment and the resulting estimates of fair value can be significantly affected by the assumptions made and methods used.
31
Table of Contents
The carrying amount and estimated fair value of financial instruments not recorded at fair value in their entirety on a recurring basis on our consolidated balance sheets are as follows as of:
June 30, 2013
Carrying
Value
Estimated
Fair Value
(Level 1)
(Level 2)
(Level 3)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
$
21,366
$
21,366
$
21,366
$
—
$
—
Certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions
1,810
1,813
—
1,813
—
Mortgage loans AFS
743
768
—
768
—
Total loans
803,452
808,902
—
—
808,902
Less allowance for loan and lease losses
(11,700
)
(11,700
)
—
—
(11,700
)
Net loans
791,752
797,202
—
—
797,202
Accrued interest receivable
5,232
5,232
5,232
—
—
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values (1)
18,242
18,242
—
—
—
OMSRs
2,381
2,381
—
2,381
—
LIABILITIES
Deposits without stated maturities
561,224
561,224
561,224
—
—
Deposits with stated maturities
460,200
464,148
—
464,148
—
Borrowed funds
262,460
266,633
—
266,633
—
Accrued interest payable
686
686
686
—
—
December 31, 2012
Carrying
Value
Estimated
Fair Value
(Level 1)
(Level 2)
(Level 3)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
$
24,920
$
24,920
$
24,920
$
—
$
—
Certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions
4,465
4,475
—
4,475
—
Mortgage loans AFS
3,633
3,680
—
3,680
—
Total loans
772,753
784,964
—
—
784,964
Less allowance for loan and lease losses
(11,936
)
(11,936
)
—
—
(11,936
)
Net loans
760,817
773,028
—
—
773,028
Accrued interest receivable
5,227
5,227
5,227
—
—
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values (1)
18,118
18,118
—
—
—
OMSRs
2,285
2,285
—
2,285
—
LIABILITIES
Deposits without stated maturities
553,332
553,332
553,332
—
—
Deposits with stated maturities
464,335
472,630
—
472,630
—
Borrowed funds
241,001
248,822
—
248,822
—
Accrued interest payable
751
751
751
—
—
(1)
Due to the characteristics of equity securities without readily determinable fair values, they are not disclosed under a specific fair value hierarchy. If we were to record an impairment adjustment related to these securities, such amount would be classified as a nonrecurring Level 3 fair value adjustment.
32
Table of Contents
Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value
The table below presents the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on:
June 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
Total
(Level 1)
(Level 2)
(Level 3)
Total
(Level 1)
(Level 2)
(Level 3)
Recurring items
Trading securities
States and political subdivisions
$
950
$
—
$
950
$
—
$
1,573
$
—
$
1,573
$
—
AFS Securities
Government-sponsored enterprises
24,249
—
24,249
—
25,776
—
25,776
—
States and political subdivisions
187,302
—
187,302
—
182,743
—
182,743
—
Auction rate money market preferred
2,943
—
2,943
—
2,778
—
2,778
—
Preferred stocks
6,559
6,559
—
—
6,363
6,363
—
—
Mortgage-backed securities
149,407
—
149,407
—
155,345
—
155,345
—
Collateralized mortgage obligations
128,964
—
128,964
—
131,005
—
131,005
—
Total AFS Securities
499,424
6,559
492,865
—
504,010
6,363
497,647
—
Nonrecurring items
Impaired loans (net of the ALLL)
21,572
—
—
21,572
22,021
—
—
22,021
OMSRs
2,381
—
2,381
—
2,285
—
2,285
—
Foreclosed assets
1,105
—
—
1,105
2,018
—
—
2,018
$
525,432
$
6,559
$
496,196
$
22,677
$
531,907
$
6,363
$
501,505
$
24,039
Percent of assets and liabilities measured at fair value
1.25
%
94.44
%
4.31
%
1.20
%
94.28
%
4.52
%
The following table provides a summary of the changes in fair value of assets and liabilities recorded at fair value through earnings on a recurring basis and changes in assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, for which an impairment, or reduction of an impairment, was recognized in the
three and six
month periods ended:
Three Months Ended June 30
2013
2012
Trading
Losses
Other Gains
(Losses)
Total
Trading
Losses
Other Gains
(Losses)
Total
Recurring items
Trading securities
$
(8
)
$
—
$
(8
)
$
(16
)
$
—
$
(16
)
Borrowed funds
—
—
—
—
—
—
Nonrecurring items
—
—
Foreclosed assets
—
(68
)
(68
)
—
—
—
OMSRs
—
135
135
—
(32
)
(32
)
Total
$
(8
)
$
67
$
59
$
(16
)
$
(32
)
$
(48
)
33
Table of Contents
Six Months Ended June 30
2013
2012
Trading
Losses
Other Gains
(Losses)
Total
Trading
Losses
Other Gains
(Losses)
Total
Recurring items
Trading securities
$
(18
)
$
—
$
(18
)
$
(32
)
$
—
$
(32
)
Borrowed funds
—
—
—
—
33
33
Nonrecurring items
—
Foreclosed assets
—
(92
)
(92
)
—
(17
)
(17
)
OMSRs
—
152
152
—
42
(16
)
Total
$
(18
)
$
60
$
42
$
(32
)
$
58
$
(32
)
Note 13 – Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The following table summarizes the changes in
AOCI
by component for the:
Three Months Ended June 30
2013
2012
Unrealized
Holding Gains
(Losses) on
AFS
Securities
Defined
Benefit
Pension Plan
Total
Unrealized
Holding Gains
(Losses) on
AFS
Securities
Defined
Benefit
Pension Plan
Total
April 1, 2013
$
7,541
$
(3,671
)
$
3,870
$
6,539
$
(3,453
)
$
3,086
OCI before reclassifications
(11,997
)
—
(11,997
)
1,420
—
1,420
Amounts reclassified from AOCI
—
—
—
—
—
—
Subtotal
(11,997
)
—
(11,997
)
1,420
—
1,420
Tax effect
3,979
—
3,979
(546
)
—
(546
)
OCI, net of tax
(8,018
)
—
(8,018
)
874
—
874
June 30, 2013
$
(477
)
$
(3,671
)
$
(4,148
)
$
7,413
$
(3,453
)
$
3,960
Six Months Ended June 30
2013
2012
Unrealized
Holding Gains
(Losses) on
AFS
Securities
Defined
Benefit
Pension Plan
Total
Unrealized
Holding Gains
(Losses) on
AFS
Securities
Defined
Benefit
Pension Plan
Total
January 1, 2013
$
8,678
$
(3,671
)
$
5,007
$
5,942
$
(3,453
)
$
2,489
OCI before reclassifications
(13,958
)
—
(13,958
)
2,219
—
2,219
Amounts reclassified from AOCI
(99
)
—
(99
)
(721
)
—
(721
)
Subtotal
(14,057
)
—
(14,057
)
1,498
—
1,498
Tax effect
4,902
—
4,902
(27
)
—
(27
)
OCI, net of tax
(9,155
)
—
(9,155
)
1,471
—
1,471
June 30, 2013
$
(477
)
$
(3,671
)
$
(4,148
)
$
7,413
$
(3,453
)
$
3,960
34
Table of Contents
The following table details reclassification adjustments and the related affected line items on our interim condensed consolidated statements of income for the noted periods:
Details about AOCI components
Amount
Reclassified from
AOCI
Affected Line Item in the
Interim Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Income
Three Months Ended June 30
Six Months Ended June 30
2013
2012
2013
2012
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on AFS securities
$
—
$
—
$
99
$
1,003
Gain (loss) on sale of AFS securities
—
—
—
(282
)
Net AFS impairment loss
—
—
99
721
Income before federal income tax expense
—
—
34
245
Federal income tax expense
$
—
$
—
$
65
$
476
Net income
Note 14 – Parent Company Only Financial Information
Interim Condensed Balance Sheets
June 30
2013
December 31
2012
ASSETS
Cash on deposit at the Bank
$
812
$
332
AFS Securities
3,595
3,939
Investments in subsidiaries
110,500
115,781
Premises and equipment
2,091
2,041
Other assets
52,303
52,398
TOTAL ASSETS
$
169,301
$
174,491
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Other liabilities
$
10,013
$
10,002
Shareholders' equity
159,288
164,489
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
$
169,301
$
174,491
35
Table of Contents
Interim Condensed Statements of Income
Three Months Ended
June 30
Six Months Ended
June 30
2013
2012
2013
2012
Income
Dividends from subsidiaries
$
1,500
$
1,500
$
3,000
$
3,125
Interest income
41
43
84
89
Management fee and other
559
551
1,067
966
Total income
2,100
2,094
4,151
4,180
Expenses
Compensation and benefits
669
604
1,381
1,214
Occupancy and equipment
119
97
230
182
Audit and related fees
93
81
158
175
Other
297
265
501
497
Total expenses
1,178
1,047
2,270
2,068
Income before income tax benefit and equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries
922
1,047
1,881
2,112
Federal income tax benefit
199
160
388
357
1,121
1,207
2,269
2,469
Undistributed earnings of subsidiaries
2,092
1,797
4,031
3,769
Net income
$
3,213
$
3,004
$
6,300
$
6,238
36
Table of Contents
Interim Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
Six Months Ended
June 30
2013
2012
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
$
6,300
$
6,238
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operations
Undistributed earnings of subsidiaries
(4,031
)
(3,769
)
Undistributed earnings of equity securities without readily determinable fair values
125
—
Share-based payment awards
258
295
Depreciation
77
54
Net amortization of AFS securities
1
2
Changes in operating assets and liabilities which used cash
Other assets
(26
)
(278
)
Accrued interest and other liabilities
211
(69
)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES
2,915
2,473
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Maturities, calls, and sales of AFS securities
395
370
Purchases of equipment and premises
(127
)
(81
)
Repayment of advances to subsidiaries
101
—
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES
369
289
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net increase (decrease) in borrowed funds
(200
)
(597
)
Cash dividends paid on common stock
(3,224
)
(3,034
)
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock
1,900
1,322
Common stock repurchased
(1,114
)
(995
)
Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations
(166
)
(225
)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES
(2,804
)
(3,529
)
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
480
(767
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
332
1,474
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
812
$
707
Note 15 – Operating Segments
Our reportable segments are based on legal entities that account for at least
10%
of net operating results. The operations of the Bank as of
June 30, 2013
and
2012
and each of the
three and six
month periods then ended, represented
90%
or more of our consolidated total assets and operating results. As such, no additional segment reporting is presented.
37
Table of Contents
Item 2 –
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
ISABELLA BANK CORPORATION FINANCIAL REVIEW
(
Dollars in thousands
except per share amounts
)
This section reviews our financial condition and results of our operations for the
three and six
month periods ended
June 30, 2013
and
2012
. This analysis should be read in conjunction with our
2012
annual report and with the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements and notes, beginning on page 4 of this report.
Executive Summary
Despite compressed margins, we surpassed
2012
earnings on a quarterly and
year-to-date
basis due to continued improvement in credit quality, a reduction in the provision
for loan losses, and loan growth of
$30.70 million
in the first
six
months of
2013
. Our continued success throughout these challenging times is a direct result of our unwavering focus on community banking principles, prudent underwriting standards, and long term sustainable growth. This focus has enabled us to continue to meet the needs of the communities we serve, which translates into increased shareholder value.
As we continue to provide superior customer service, we are excited to see the construction progress on our latest branch located in Big Rapids, Michigan, which is expected to open in the third quarter. The new location will complement our existing Big Rapids office and provide additional shareholder value for years to come.
Recent Legislation
The Health Care and Education Act of 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, and the JOBS Act, have already had, and are expected to continue to have, a significant negative impact on our operating results. Of these three acts, the Dodd-Frank Act has had, and is likely to have, the most significant impact, along with its establishment of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. This particular act made sweeping changes in the regulation of financial institutions aimed at strengthening the oversight of the federal government over the operation of the financial services sector and increasing the protection of consumers within the financial services sector. As a result of the implementation of some of the provisions, we have had increases in compensation costs and this trend is expected to continue.
The CFPB has begun to issue substantial proposed and final rules regarding consumer lending, including residential mortgage lending. These rules will likely further increase our compensation and outside advisor costs to ensure our compliance with the new regulations.
On July 3 , 2013, the FRB published revised BASEL III Capital standards for Banks. The rules redefine what is included or deducted from equity capital, changes risk weighting for certain on and off-balance sheet assets, increases the minimum required equity capital to be considered well capitalized, and introduces a capital cushion buffer. The rules take effect for us on January 1, 2015 and are not expected to have a material impact on the Corporation.
38
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Selected Financial Data
The following table outlines our quarterly results of operations and provides certain performance measures for:
Three Months Ended
June 30
Six Months Ended
June 30
2013
2012
2013
2012
INCOME STATEMENT DATA
Interest income
$
13,440
$
14,188
$
26,968
$
28,392
Interest expense
2,781
3,429
5,602
7,133
Net interest income
10,659
10,759
21,366
21,259
Provision for loan losses
215
439
515
900
Noninterest income
2,736
2,544
5,183
6,085
Noninterest expenses
9,324
9,188
18,515
18,761
Federal income tax expense
643
672
1,219
1,445
Net Income
$
3,213
$
3,004
$
6,300
$
6,238
PER SHARE
Basic earnings
0.42
0.40
0.82
0.82
Diluted earnings
0.41
0.39
0.80
0.80
Dividends
0.21
0.20
0.42
0.40
Market value*
24.75
24.85
24.75
24.85
Tangible book value*
15.19
14.37
15.19
14.37
BALANCE SHEET DATA
At end of period
Loans
$
803,452
$
754,952
$
803,452
$
754,952
Total assets
1,451,415
1,381,496
1,451,415
1,381,496
Deposits
1,021,424
978,828
1,021,424
978,828
Shareholders' equity
159,288
159,855
159,288
159,855
Average balance
Loans
$
780,909
$
748,223
$
773,825
$
746,072
Total assets
1,440,370
1,369,240
1,436,287
1,362,675
Deposits
1,022,153
972,953
1,024,924
975,835
Shareholders’ equity
165,710
154,627
165,112
155,374
PERFORMANCE RATIOS
Return on average total assets (annualized)
0.89
%
0.88
%
0.88
%
0.92
%
Return on average shareholders' equity (annualized)
7.76
%
7.77
%
7.63
%
8.03
%
Return on average tangible equity (annualized)
11.10
%
11.11
%
10.98
%
11.66
%
Net interest margin yield (FTE annualized)
3.50
%
3.73
%
3.52
%
3.71
%
Loan to deposit*
78.66
%
77.13
%
78.66
%
77.13
%
Nonperforming loans to total loans*
0.52
%
0.86
%
0.52
%
0.86
%
Nonperforming assets to total assets*
0.36
%
0.64
%
0.36
%
0.64
%
ALLL to nonperforming loans*
280.51
%
188.67
%
280.51
%
188.67
%
CAPITAL RATIOS
Shareholders' equity to assets*
10.97
%
11.57
%
10.97
%
11.57
%
Tier 1 capital to average assets*
8.38
%
8.24
%
8.38
%
8.24
%
Tier 1 risk-based capital*
13.59
%
13.19
%
13.59
%
13.19
%
Total risk-based capital*
14.84
%
14.44
%
14.84
%
14.44
%
* At end of period
39
Table of Contents
AVERAGE BALANCES, INTEREST RATE, AND NET INTEREST INCOME
The following schedules present the daily average amount outstanding for each major category of interest earning assets, nonearning assets, interest bearing liabilities, and noninterest bearing liabilities. This schedule also presents an analysis of interest income and interest expense for the periods indicated. All interest income is reported on a FTE basis using a 34% tax rate. Nonaccruing loans, for the purpose of the following computations, are included in the average loan amounts outstanding.
FRB
and
FHLB
restricted equity holdings are included in accrued income and other assets.
The following table displays the results for the three month periods ended
June 30
:
2013
2012
Average
Balance
Tax
Equivalent
Interest
Average
Yield /
Rate
Average
Balance
Tax
Equivalent
Interest
Average
Yield /
Rate
INTEREST EARNING ASSETS
Loans
$
780,909
$
10,280
5.27
%
$
748,223
$
10,849
5.80
%
Taxable investment securities
341,232
1,798
2.11
%
316,237
1,988
2.51
%
Nontaxable investment securities
162,626
2,024
4.98
%
144,492
1,983
5.49
%
Trading account securities
1,156
14
4.84
%
2,496
33
5.29
%
Other
23,533
109
1.85
%
25,911
113
1.74
%
Total earning assets
1,309,456
14,225
4.35
%
1,237,359
14,966
4.84
%
NONEARNING ASSETS
ALLL
(11,889
)
(12,586
)
Cash and demand deposits due from banks
17,157
18,572
Premises and equipment
25,917
24,948
Accrued income and other assets
99,729
100,947
Total assets
$
1,440,370
$
1,369,240
INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES
Interest bearing demand deposits
$
181,044
40
0.09
%
$
167,399
50
0.12
%
Savings deposits
242,247
90
0.15
%
210,872
109
0.21
%
Time deposits
460,379
1,692
1.47
%
475,996
2,209
1.86
%
Borrowed funds
243,936
959
1.57
%
227,360
1,061
1.87
%
Total interest bearing liabilities
1,127,606
2,781
0.99
%
1,081,627
3,429
1.27
%
NONINTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES
Demand deposits
138,483
118,686
Other
8,571
14,300
Shareholders’ equity
165,710
154,627
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
$
1,440,370
$
1,369,240
Net interest income (FTE)
$
11,444
$
11,537
Net yield on interest earning assets (FTE)
3.50
%
3.73
%
40
Table of Contents
The following table displays the results for the
six
month periods ended
June 30
:
2013
2012
Average
Balance
Tax
Equivalent
Interest
Average
Yield /
Rate
Average
Balance
Tax
Equivalent
Interest
Average
Yield /
Rate
INTEREST EARNING ASSETS
Loans
$
773,825
$
20,610
5.33
%
$
746,072
$
21,789
5.84
%
Taxable investment securities
342,375
3,632
2.12
%
300,689
3,877
2.58
%
Nontaxable investment securities
159,147
4,035
5.07
%
141,560
3,948
5.58
%
Trading account securities
1,363
35
5.14
%
3,457
97
5.61
%
Other
26,955
225
1.67
%
37,246
242
1.30
%
Total earning assets
1,303,665
28,537
4.38
%
1,229,024
29,953
4.87
%
NONEARNING ASSETS
ALLL
(11,987
)
(12,597
)
Cash and demand deposits due from banks
17,909
19,442
Premises and equipment
25,927
24,974
Accrued income and other assets
100,773
101,832
Total assets
$
1,436,287
$
1,362,675
INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES
Interest bearing demand deposits
$
183,921
81
0.09
%
$
170,153
104
0.12
%
Savings deposits
241,824
181
0.15
%
209,047
231
0.22
%
Time deposits
460,958
3,434
1.49
%
477,843
4,545
1.90
%
Borrowed funds
237,863
1,906
1.60
%
219,386
2,253
2.05
%
Total interest bearing liabilities
1,124,566
5,602
1.00
%
1,076,429
7,133
1.33
%
NONINTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES
Demand deposits
138,221
118,792
Other
8,388
12,080
Shareholders’ equity
165,112
155,374
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
$
1,436,287
$
1,362,675
Net interest income (FTE)
$
22,935
$
22,820
Net yield on interest earning assets (FTE)
3.52
%
3.71
%
Net Interest Income
Net interest income is our primary source of income. Interest income includes loan fees of $
862
and $
1,683
for the
three and six
month periods ended
June 30, 2013
, respectively, as compared to $
809
and $
1,456
during the same periods in
2012
. For analytical purposes, net interest income is adjusted to an FTE basis by adding the income tax savings from interest on tax exempt loans and securities, thus making year to year comparisons more meaningful.
41
Table of Contents
VOLUME AND RATE VARIANCE ANALYSIS
The following table sets forth the effect of volume and rate changes on interest income and expense for the periods indicated. For the purpose of this table, changes in interest due to volume and rate were determined as follows:
Volume Variance—change in volume multiplied by the previous year’s rate.
Rate Variance—change in the FTE rate multiplied by the previous year’s volume.
The change in interest due to both volume and rate has been allocated to volume and rate changes in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each.
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2013 Compared to
June 30, 2012
Increase (Decrease) Due to
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2013 Compared to
June 30, 2012
Increase (Decrease) Due to
Volume
Rate
Net
Volume
Rate
Net
CHANGES IN INTEREST INCOME
Loans
$
460
$
(1,029
)
$
(569
)
$
789
$
(1,968
)
$
(1,179
)
Taxable AFS securities
149
(339
)
(190
)
496
(741
)
(245
)
Nontaxable AFS securities
236
(195
)
41
465
(378
)
87
Trading securities
(16
)
(3
)
(19
)
(54
)
(8
)
(62
)
Other
(11
)
7
(4
)
(76
)
59
(17
)
Total changes in interest income
818
(1,559
)
(741
)
1,620
(3,036
)
(1,416
)
CHANGES IN INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest bearing demand deposits
4
(14
)
(10
)
8
(31
)
(23
)
Savings deposits
15
(34
)
(19
)
32
(82
)
(50
)
Time deposits
(70
)
(447
)
(517
)
(156
)
(955
)
(1,111
)
Borrowed funds
73
(175
)
(102
)
178
(525
)
(347
)
Total changes in interest expense
22
(670
)
(648
)
62
(1,593
)
(1,531
)
Net change in interest margin (FTE)
$
796
$
(889
)
$
(93
)
$
1,558
$
(1,443
)
$
115
As shown in the following table, we continue to experience downward pressure on our net yield on interest earning assets. This pressure is a direct result of FRB monetary policy which has reduced yields on interest earning assets more than rates on interest bearing liabilities. The persistent low interest rate environment coupled with an increase in the concentration of AFS securities and trading securities as a percentage of earnings assets has also placed downward pressure on net interest margin yield.
Average Yield / Rate For The Three Month Periods Ended:
June 30
2013
March 31
2013
December 31
2012
September 30
2012
June 30
2012
Total earning assets
4.35
%
4.41
%
4.61
%
4.76
%
4.84
%
Total interest bearing liabilities
0.99
%
1.01
%
1.12
%
1.18
%
1.27
%
Net yield on interest earning assets (FTE)
3.50
%
3.54
%
3.65
%
3.73
%
3.73
%
While there have recently been noticeable increases in long term interest rates, short and medium term rates continue to be at historically low levels, and therefore the net yield on interest earning assets is not likely to increase in the near future. We anticipate that the continued reduction in rates earned on loans without a proportionate decline in funding rate will continue to cause downward pressure in net interest margin yield.
42
Table of Contents
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
The viability of any financial institution is ultimately determined by its management of credit risk. Loans outstanding represent our single largest concentration of risk. The
ALLL
is our estimation of probable losses inherent in the existing loan portfolio. We allocate the
ALLL
throughout the loan portfolio based on our assessment of the underlying risks associated with each loan segment. Our assessments include allocations based on specific impairment allocations, historical
charge-off
s, internally assigned credit ratings, and past due and nonaccrual balances. A portion of the
ALLL
is not allocated to any one loan segment, but is instead a reflection of other qualitative risks within the loan portfolio.
The following tables summarize our
charge-off
and recovery activity for the:
Three Months Ended
June 30
Six Months Ended
June 30
2013
2012
2013
2012
ALLL at beginning of period
$
11,909
$
12,375
$
11,936
$
12,375
Loans charged-off
Commercial and agricultural
234
237
445
686
Residential real estate
397
238
587
353
Consumer
88
146
209
237
Total Loans charged-off
719
621
1,241
1,276
Recoveries
Commercial and agricultural
166
42
223
128
Residential real estate
61
20
114
61
Consumer
68
63
153
130
Total Recoveries
295
125
490
319
Provision for loan losses
215
439
515
900
ALLL at end of period
$
11,700
$
12,318
$
11,700
$
12,318
Net loans charged-off
$
424
$
496
$
751
$
957
Year-to-date average loans outstanding
780,909
748,223
773,825
746,072
Net loans charged-off to average loans outstanding
0.05
%
0.07
%
0.10
%
0.13
%
Total loans at end of period
$
803,452
$
754,952
$
803,452
$
754,952
ALLL as a% of loans at end of period
1.46
%
1.63
%
1.46
%
1.63
%
As shown in the preceding table, the level of net
charge-offs
continues to decline. This trend has allowed us to reduce the provision for loan losses, leading to a decline in the
ALLL
in both amount and as a percentage of loans. We do not expect any significant increases in net loans
charged-off
throughout the remainder of
2013
and, as such, we anticipate the provision for loan losses to approximate current levels. For further discussion of the allocation of the
ALLL
, see “
Note 6 – Loans and ALLL
” of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
Loans Past Due and Loans in Nonaccrual Status
Increases in past due and nonaccrual loans can have a significant impact on the
ALLL
. To determine the potential impact, and corresponding estimated losses, we analyze our historical loss trends on loans past due greater than 30 days and nonaccrual loans. We monitor all loans that are past due and in nonaccrual status for indicators of additional deterioration.
Total Past Due and Nonaccrual
June 30
2013
March 31
2013
December 31
2012
September 30
2012
June 30
2012
Commercial and agricultural
$
4,962
$
8,713
$
7,271
$
11,004
$
9,459
Residential real estate
5,080
4,077
5,431
4,879
4,496
Consumer
104
212
199
284
179
Total
$
10,146
$
13,002
$
12,901
$
16,167
$
14,134
43
Table of Contents
A summary of loans past due and in
nonaccrual
status, including the composition of the ending balance of
nonaccrual
loans by type, is included in “
Note 6 – Loans and ALLL
” of our interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
Troubled Debt Restructurings
We have taken a proactive approach to avoid foreclosures on borrowers who are willing to work with us in modifying their loans, thus making them more affordable. While this approach has allowed certain borrowers to develop a payment structure that will allow them to continue making payments in lieu of foreclosure, it has contributed to a significant increase in the level of loans classified as
TDRs
. The implementation of ASU No. 2011-02
“A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring”
has also contributed to the increased level of
TDRs
. The modifications have been successful for us and our customers as very few of the modified loans have resulted in foreclosures. At the time of the
TDR
, the loan is reviewed to determine whether or not to classify the loan as accrual or nonaccrual. The majority of new modifications result in terms that satisfy our criteria for continued interest accrual.
TDRs
that have been placed in nonaccrual status may be placed back on accrual status after six months of continued performance.
We restructure debt with borrowers who due to temporary financial difficulties are unable to service their debt under the original terms. We may extend the amortization period, reduce interest rates, forgive principal, or a combination of these modifications. Typically, the modifications are for a period of five years or less. There were no
TDRs
that were Government sponsored as of
June 30, 2013
or
December 31, 2012
.
Losses associated with
TDRs
, if any, are included in the estimation of the
ALLL
in the quarter in which a loan is identified as a
TDR
, and we review the
ALLL
estimation each reporting period to ensure its continued appropriateness.
The following tables provide a
roll-forward
of
TDRs
for the:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
Accruing Interest
Nonaccrual
Total
Number
of
Loans
Balance
Number
of
Loans
Balance
Number
of
Loans
Balance
April 1, 2013
119
$
16,900
19
$
2,502
138
$
19,402
New modifications
14
3,592
—
—
14
3,592
Principal payments
—
(198
)
—
(206
)
—
(404
)
Loans paid-off
(7
)
(1,089
)
(4
)
(497
)
(11
)
(1,586
)
Partial charge-off
—
—
—
—
—
—
Balances charged-off
(3
)
(147
)
—
—
(3
)
(147
)
Transfers to OREO
—
—
—
—
—
—
Transfers to accrual status
1
105
(1
)
(105
)
—
—
Transfers to nonaccrual status
(1
)
(29
)
1
29
—
—
June 30, 2013
123
$
19,134
15
$
1,723
138
$
20,857
44
Table of Contents
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
Accruing Interest
Nonaccrual
Total
Number
of
Loans
Balance
Number
of
Loans
Balance
Number
of
Loans
Balance
January 1, 2013
115
$
16,531
19
$
2,824
134
$
19,355
New modifications
22
4,411
1
98
23
4,509
Principal payments
—
(463
)
—
(243
)
—
(706
)
Loans paid-off
(10
)
(1,219
)
(5
)
(697
)
(15
)
(1,916
)
Partial charge-off
—
(15
)
—
(211
)
—
(226
)
Balances charged-off
(3
)
(147
)
—
—
(3
)
(147
)
Transfers to OREO
—
—
(1
)
(12
)
(1
)
(12
)
Transfers to accrual status
1
105
(1
)
(105
)
—
—
Transfers to nonaccrual status
(2
)
(69
)
2
69
—
—
June 30, 2013
123
$
19,134
15
$
1,723
138
$
20,857
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
Accruing Interest
Nonaccrual
Total
Number
of
Loans
Balance
Number
of
Loans
Balance
Number
of
Loans
Balance
April 1, 2012
127
$
20,964
17
$
2,138
144
$
23,102
New modifications
12
989
1
—
13
989
Principal payments
—
(423
)
—
(30
)
—
(453
)
Loans paid-off
(5
)
(550
)
—
—
(5
)
(550
)
Partial charge-off
—
(152
)
—
—
—
(152
)
Balances charged-off
(1
)
(8
)
(1
)
(25
)
(2
)
(33
)
Transfers to OREO
—
—
(4
)
(360
)
(4
)
(360
)
Transfers to accrual status
—
—
—
—
—
—
Transfers to nonaccrual status
(7
)
(1,186
)
7
1,186
—
—
June 30, 2012
126
$
19,634
20
$
2,909
146
$
22,543
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
Accruing Interest
Nonaccrual
Total
Number
of
Loans
Balance
Number
of
Loans
Balance
Number
of
Loans
Balance
January 1, 2012
112
$
17,738
12
$
1,018
124
$
18,756
New modifications
36
5,640
9
1,217
45
6,857
Principal payments
—
(778
)
—
(91
)
—
(869
)
Loans paid-off
(14
)
(1,591
)
—
—
(14
)
(1,591
)
Partial charge-off
—
(152
)
—
—
—
(152
)
Balances charged-off
(1
)
(8
)
(4
)
(90
)
(5
)
(98
)
Transfers to OREO
—
—
(4
)
(360
)
(4
)
(360
)
Transfers to accrual status
1
21
(1
)
(21
)
—
—
Transfers to nonaccrual status
(8
)
(1,236
)
8
1,236
—
—
June 30, 2012
126
$
19,634
20
$
2,909
146
$
22,543
45
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes our
TDRs
as of:
June 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
Accruing
Interest
Nonaccrual
Total
Accruing
Interest
Nonaccrual
Total
Total
Change
Current
$
18,264
$
874
$
19,138
$
16,301
$
941
$
17,242
$
1,896
Past due 30-59 days
870
34
904
158
561
719
185
Past due 60-89 days
—
—
—
72
41
113
(113
)
Past due 90 days or more
—
815
815
—
1,281
1,281
(466
)
Total
$
19,134
$
1,723
$
20,857
$
16,531
$
2,824
$
19,355
$
1,502
Additional disclosures about
TDRs
are included in “
Note 6 – Loans and ALLL
” of our interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
Impaired Loans
The following is a summary of information pertaining to impaired loans as of:
June 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
Outstanding
Balance
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Valuation
Allowance
Outstanding
Balance
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Valuation
Allowance
TDRs
Commercial real estate
$
9,411
$
10,085
$
1,269
$
9,227
$
9,640
$
1,333
Commercial other
2,286
2,316
64
1,167
1,197
38
Agricultural real estate
223
223
31
91
91
32
Agricultural other
105
225
—
569
689
59
Residential real estate senior liens
8,798
9,197
1,489
8,224
8,670
1,429
Residential real estate junior liens
—
—
—
21
57
4
Consumer secured
34
34
—
56
56
—
Total TDRs
20,857
22,080
2,853
19,355
20,400
2,895
Other impaired loans
Commercial real estate
1,913
2,474
309
1,817
2,304
320
Commercial other
29
110
—
2,245
2,376
359
Agricultural other
248
248
—
63
63
—
Residential real estate senior liens
1,677
2,478
242
2,226
3,002
354
Residential real estate junior liens
71
109
13
51
61
9
Home equity lines of credit
174
474
—
182
482
—
Consumer secured
20
20
—
19
28
—
Total other impaired loans
4,132
5,913
564
6,603
8,316
1,042
Total impaired loans
$
24,989
$
27,993
$
3,417
$
25,958
$
28,716
$
3,937
Additional disclosure related to impaired loans is included in “
Note 6 – Loans and ALLL
” of our interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
46
Table of Contents
Nonperforming
Assets
The following table summarizes our
nonperforming
assets as of:
June 30
2013
December 31
2012
Nonaccrual loans
$
3,651
$
7,303
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more
520
428
Total nonperforming loans
4,171
7,731
Foreclosed assets
1,105
2,018
Total nonperforming assets
$
5,276
$
9,749
Nonperforming loans as a % of total loans
0.52
%
1.00
%
Nonperforming assets as a % of total assets
0.36
%
0.68
%
Loans are placed in
nonaccrual
status when the foreclosure process has begun, generally after a loan is 90 days past due, unless they are well secured. Upon transferring the loans to
nonaccrual
status, we perform an evaluation to determine the net realizable value of the underlying collateral. This evaluation is used to help determine if any
charge-offs
are necessary. Loans may be placed back on accrual status after
six
months of continued performance.
Included in the
nonaccrual
loan balances above were loans currently classified as
TDRs
as of:
June 30
2013
December 31
2012
Commercial and agricultural
$
1,317
$
2,325
Residential real estate
406
499
Total
$
1,723
$
2,824
The following table lists individually significant commercial and agricultural loan relationships in
nonaccrual
status as of
June 30, 2013
and
December 31, 2012
. To be classified as individually significant, the recorded investment in
nonaccrual
loans to each borrower must have exceeded $1,000 as of the end of either period.
June 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
Oustanding
Balance
Specific
Allocation
Oustanding
Balance
Specific
Allocation
Borrower 1
$
—
$
—
$
2,077
$
359
Others not individually significant
3,651
5,226
Total
$
3,651
$
7,303
The reduction in the outstanding balance for Borrower 1 was the result of the loan being placed back on accrual status due to continued performance. There were no other individually significant credits included in nonaccrual loans as of
June 30, 2013
or
December 31, 2012
.
Additional disclosures about
nonaccrual
loans are included in “
Note 6 – Loans and ALLL
” of our interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
We continue to devote considerable attention to identifying impaired loans and adjusting the net carrying value of these loans to their current net realizable values through the establishment of a specific reserve or the recording of a
charge-off
. We believe that all loans deemed to be impaired have been identified.
We believe that the level of the
ALLL
is appropriate as of
June 30, 2013
and we will continue to closely monitor overall credit quality and our policies and procedures related to the analysis of the
ALLL
to ensure that the
ALLL
remains appropriate.
47
Table of Contents
NONINTEREST INCOME AND EXPENSES
Noninterest
Income
Noninterest
income consists of service charges and fee income, gains from the sale of mortgage loans, gains and losses on trading securities and borrowings measured at fair value, gains from the sale of investment securities, and other. Significant account balances are highlighted in the accompanying tables with additional descriptions of significant fluctuations:
Three Months Ended June 30
Change
2013
2012
$
%
Service charges and fees
NSF and overdraft fees
$
558
$
597
$
(39
)
(6.53
)%
ATM and debit card fees
489
477
12
2.52
%
Trust fees
302
266
36
13.53
%
Freddie Mac servicing fee
187
187
—
—
%
Service charges on deposit accounts
95
84
11
13.10
%
Net OMSRs income (loss)
88
(13
)
101
N/M
All other
28
30
(2
)
(6.67
)%
Total service charges and fees
1,747
1,628
119
7.31
%
Gain on sale of mortgage loans
249
279
(30
)
(10.75
)%
Earnings on corporate owned life insurance policies
190
177
13
7.34
%
Gain (loss) on sale of AFS securities
—
—
—
—
%
Other
Brokerage and advisory fees
181
137
44
32.12
%
Other
369
323
46
14.24
%
Total other
550
460
90
19.57
%
Total noninterest income
$
2,736
$
2,544
$
192
7.55
%
48
Table of Contents
Six Months Ended June 30
Change
2013
2012
$
%
Service charges and fees
NSF and overdraft fees
$
1,074
$
1,155
$
(81
)
(7.01
)%
ATM and debit card fees
944
934
10
1.07
%
Trust fees
565
516
49
9.50
%
Freddie Mac servicing fee
371
378
(7
)
(1.85
)%
Service charges on deposit accounts
185
158
27
17.09
%
Net OMSRs income (loss)
96
50
46
92.00
%
All other
56
66
(10
)
(15.15
)%
Total service charges and fees
3,291
3,257
34
1.04
%
Gain on sale of mortgage loans
607
658
(51
)
(7.75
)%
Earnings on corporate owned life insurance policies
359
348
11
3.16
%
Gain (loss) on sale of AFS securities
99
1,003
(904
)
(90.13
)%
Other
Brokerage and advisory fees
328
267
61
22.85
%
Other
499
552
(53
)
(9.60
)%
Total other
827
819
8
0.98
%
Total noninterest income
$
5,183
$
6,085
$
(902
)
(14.82
)%
Significant changes in
noninterest
income are detailed below:
•
We continuously analyze various fees related to deposit accounts including service charges and NSF and overdraft fees. Based on these analyses, we make any necessary adjustments to ensure that our fee structure is within the range of our competitors, while at the same time making sure that the fees remain fair to deposit customers. NSF and overdraft fees represent the largest single component of service charges and fees. While we have experienced significant increases in deposit accounts, NSF and overdraft fees continue to decline. This decline has been the result of reduced overdraft activity by our customers. We expect this trend to continue.
•
In recent periods, we have invested considerable efforts to increase our market share in trust and brokerage and advisory services. These efforts have translated into increases in trust fees and brokerage and advisory fees. We expect this trend to continue.
•
Residential loan refinancing activity declined in 2013, resulting in a decline in the gain on sale of mortgage loans. The decline in refinancing activity was the result of a decline in demand as well as an increase in offering rates. Offsetting the decline in the gain on sale of mortgage loans was an increase in net
OMSRs
income. We expect mortgage origination volumes and the related income to continue to decline when compared to 2012.
•
We are continually analyzing our AFS securities for potential sale opportunities. These analyses identified several mortgage-backed securities pools in 2013 and 2012 that made economic sense to sell. We do not anticipate any significant investment sales during the remainder of 2013.
•
The fluctuations in all other income is spread throughout various categories, none of which are individually significant. We do not anticipate any significant fluctuations from current levels for the remainder of 2013.
49
Table of Contents
Noninterest
Expenses
Noninterest
expenses include compensation and benefits, furniture and equipment, occupancy, net AFS security impairment loss, and other expenses. Significant account balances are highlighted in the accompanying tables with additional descriptions of significant fluctuations:
Three Months Ended June 30
Change
2013
2012
$
%
Compensation and benefits
Employee salaries
$
3,844
$
3,820
$
24
0.63
%
Employee benefits
1,392
1,412
(20
)
(1.42
)%
Total compensation and benefits
5,236
5,232
4
0.08
%
Furniture and equipment
Service contracts
534
534
—
—
%
Depreciation
459
443
16
3.61
%
ATM and debit card fees
185
179
6
3.35
%
All other
14
14
—
—
%
Total furniture and equipment
1,192
1,170
22
1.88
%
Occupancy
Depreciation
165
155
10
6.45
%
Outside services
151
153
(2
)
(1.31
)%
Property taxes
134
130
4
3.08
%
Utilities
119
98
21
21.43
%
All other
72
63
9
14.29
%
Total occupancy
641
599
42
7.01
%
Net AFS security impairment loss
—
—
—
N/M
Other
Marketing and community relations
432
535
(103
)
(19.25
)%
FDIC insurance premiums
273
213
60
28.17
%
Directors fees
205
209
(4
)
(1.91
)%
Audit and related fees
162
154
8
5.19
%
Education and travel
116
139
(23
)
(16.55
)%
Postage and freight
94
94
—
—
%
Printing and supplies
99
110
(11
)
(10.00
)%
Legal fees
120
81
39
48.15
%
Consulting fees
83
71
12
16.90
%
Other
671
581
90
15.49
%
Total other
2,255
2,187
68
3.11
%
Total noninterest expenses
$
9,324
$
9,188
$
136
1.48
%
50
Table of Contents
Six Months Ended June 30
Change
2013
2012
$
%
Compensation and benefits
Employee salaries
$
7,720
$
7,648
$
72
0.94
%
Employee benefits
2,961
2,885
76
2.63
%
Total compensation and benefits
10,681
10,533
148
1.41
%
Furniture and equipment
Service contracts
1,070
1,014
56
5.52
%
Depreciation
923
886
37
4.18
%
ATM and debit card fees
353
330
23
6.97
%
All other
35
30
5
16.67
%
Total furniture and equipment
2,381
2,260
121
5.35
%
Occupancy
Depreciation
326
309
17
5.50
%
Outside services
321
300
21
7.00
%
Property taxes
269
259
10
3.86
%
Utilities
255
224
31
13.84
%
All other
135
148
(13
)
(8.78
)%
Total occupancy
1,306
1,240
66
5.32
%
Net AFS security impairment loss
—
282
(282
)
N/M
Other
Marketing and community relations
674
1,029
(355
)
(34.50
)%
FDIC insurance premiums
545
428
117
27.34
%
Directors fees
404
419
(15
)
(3.58
)%
Audit and related fees
301
330
(29
)
(8.79
)%
Education and travel
238
266
(28
)
(10.53
)%
Postage and freight
193
195
(2
)
(1.03
)%
Printing and supplies
185
219
(34
)
(15.53
)%
Legal fees
180
143
37
25.87
%
Consulting fees
155
258
(103
)
(39.92
)%
Other
1,272
1,159
113
9.75
%
Total other
4,147
4,446
(299
)
(6.73
)%
Total noninterest expenses
$
18,515
$
18,761
$
(246
)
(1.31
)%
To help offset our current declining net interest margin yields, we have made a conscious effort to limit increases, or reduce,
noninterest
expenses. These efforts translated into a
decline
of
1.31%
in total
noninterest
expenses when the first
six
months of
2013
are compared to the same period in
2012
.
Significant changes in
noninterest
expenses are detailed below:
•
During the first quarter of 2012, we recorded a credit impairment on an AFS security through earnings due to a bond being downgraded below investment grade. We continuously monitor the AFS security portfolio for other potential
OTTI
. For further discussion, see “
Note 5 – AFS Securities
” of our notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
•
We have consistently been a strong supporter of the various communities, schools, and charities in the markets we serve. We sponsor a foundation, which we established in 1996, that is generally funded from non-recurring, or extraordinary, revenue sources. The foundation provides centralized oversight for donations to organizations that benefit our communities. Included in marketing and community relations were discretionary donations to the foundation of $
200
and $
200
for the
three and six
month periods ended
June 30, 2013
, respectively, as compared to $
250
and $
500
during the same periods in
2012
.
51
Table of Contents
•
Audit and related fees
fluctuate from period to period based on the timing of services performed.
Audit and related fees
are expected to approximate current levels throughout the remainder of 2013.
•
Education and travel
expenses were higher in 2012 as a result of a company-wide customer service seminar which occurred in the second quarter of 2012. Our 2013 company-wide customer service seminar is scheduled for the fourth quarter of 2013.
•
Legal fees
increased in 2013 as a result of higher costs associated with filing documents with the SEC, primarily those associated with
XBRL
tagging. We expect legal fees to approximate current levels for the remainder of 2013.
•
Printing and supplies
expenses declined in 2013 as a result of increased utilization of paperless office opportunities.
•
During the first quarter of 2012, we incurred consulting fees to review our
FHLB
advances for potential restructuring options. They were also elevated in 2012 due to the engagement of consultants to review our loan prepayment and deposit decay assumptions and various information technology projects. Consulting fees are anticipated to approximate current levels for the remainder of 2013.
•
The fluctuations in all other expenses are spread throughout various categories, none of which are individually significant.
ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL CONDITION
June 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
$ Change
% Change
(unannualized)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
$
21,366
$
24,920
$
(3,554
)
(14.26
)%
Certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions
1,810
4,465
(2,655
)
(59.46
)%
Trading securities
950
1,573
(623
)
(39.61
)%
AFS securities
499,424
504,010
(4,586
)
(0.91
)%
Mortgage loans AFS
743
3,633
(2,890
)
(79.55
)%
Loans
803,452
772,753
30,699
3.97
%
ALLL
(11,700
)
(11,936
)
236
N/M
Premises and equipment
25,852
25,787
65
0.25
%
Corporate owned life insurance policies
24,101
22,773
1,328
5.83
%
Accrued interest receivable
5,232
5,227
5
0.10
%
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values
18,242
18,118
124
0.68
%
Goodwill and other intangible assets
46,418
46,532
(114
)
(0.24
)%
Other assets
15,525
12,784
2,741
21.44
%
TOTAL ASSETS
$
1,451,415
$
1,430,639
$
20,776
1.45
%
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities
Deposits
$
1,021,424
$
1,017,667
$
3,757
0.37
%
Borrowed funds
262,460
241,001
21,459
8.90
%
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities
8,243
7,482
761
10.17
%
Total liabilities
1,292,127
1,266,150
25,977
2.05
%
Shareholders’ equity
159,288
164,489
(5,201
)
(3.16
)%
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
$
1,451,415
$
1,430,639
$
20,776
1.45
%
As shown above, total assets have increased since December 31, 2012. In the first six months of 2013, loans grew by
$30,699
. This loan growth was primary funded by increases in borrowed funds. We expect that loans will continue to grow throughout the rest of the year.
52
Table of Contents
The following table outlines the changes in loans:
June 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
$ Change
% Change
(unannualized)
Commercial
$
389,044
$
371,505
$
17,539
4.72
%
Agricultural
87,516
83,606
3,910
4.68
%
Residential real estate
293,158
284,148
9,010
3.17
%
Consumer
33,734
33,494
240
0.72
%
Total
$
803,452
$
772,753
$
30,699
3.97
%
The following table outlines the changes in deposits:
June 30, 2013
December 31, 2012
$ Change
% Change
(unannualized)
Noninterest bearing demand deposits
$
139,942
$
143,735
$
(3,793
)
(2.64
)%
Interest bearing demand deposits
173,184
181,259
(8,075
)
(4.45
)%
Savings deposits
248,098
228,338
19,760
8.65
%
Certificates of deposit
368,713
376,790
(8,077
)
(2.14
)%
Brokered certificates of deposit
57,701
55,348
2,353
4.25
%
Internet certificates of deposit
33,786
32,197
1,589
4.94
%
Total
$
1,021,424
$
1,017,667
$
3,757
0.37
%
Capital
Capital consists solely of common stock, retained earnings, and accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). We are currently authorized to raise capital through dividend reinvestment, employee and director stock purchases, and shareholder stock purchases. Pursuant to theses authorizations, we issued
77,568
shares or
$1,900
of common stock during the first
six
months of
2013
, as compared to
54,900
shares or
$1,322
of common stock during the same period in
2012
. We also offer the Directors Plan which allows participants to purchase stock units, in lieu of cash payments. Pursuant to this plan, we increased shareholders’ equity by
$258
and
$295
during the
six
month periods ended
June 30, 2013
and
2012
, respectively.
We have approved a publicly announced common stock repurchase plan. Pursuant to this plan, we repurchased
45,825
shares or
$1,114
of common stock compared to
41,581
shares for
$995
during the first
six
months of
2013
and
2012
, respectively. As of
June 30, 2013
, we were authorized to repurchase up to an additional
39,585
shares of common stock.
There are no significant regulatory constraints placed on our capital. The FRB’s current recommended minimum primary capital to assets requirement is 6.0%. Our primary capital to adjusted average assets, which consists of shareholders' equity plus the allowance for loan losses less acquisition intangibles, was
8.38%
as of
June 30, 2013
.
The FRB has established a minimum risk based capital standard. Under this standard, a framework has been established that assigns risk weights to each category of on and off balance sheet items to arrive at risk adjusted total assets. Regulatory capital is divided by the risk adjusted assets with the resulting ratio compared to the minimum standard to determine whether a corporation has adequate capital. The minimum standard is
8%
, of which at least
4%
must consist of equity capital net of goodwill. The following table sets forth the percentages required under the Risk Based Capital guidelines and our values as of:
June 30
2013
December 31
2012
Required
Equity Capital
13.59
%
13.23
%
4.00
%
Secondary Capital
1.25
%
1.25
%
4.00
%
Total Capital
14.84
%
14.48
%
8.00
%
Secondary capital includes only the
ALLL
. The percentage for the secondary capital under the required column is the maximum amount allowed from all sources.
The
FRB
and
FDIC
also prescribe minimum capital requirements for Isabella Bank. At
June 30, 2013
, the Bank exceeded these minimum capital requirements.
On July 3 , 2013, the FRB published revised BASEL III Capital standards for Banks. The rules redefine what is included or deducted from equity capital, changes risk weighting for certain on and off-balance sheet
53
Table of Contents
assets, increases the minimum required equity capital to be considered well capitalized, and introduces a capital cushion buffer. The rules take effect for us on January 1, 2015 and are not expected to have a material impact on the Corporation.
Contractual Obligations and Loan Commitments
We are party to credit related financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk. These financial instruments are entered into in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. These financial instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The contract or notional amounts of these instruments reflect the extent of involvement we have in a particular class of financial instrument.
The following table summarizes our credit related financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk as of:
June 30
2013
December 31
2012
Unfunded commitments under lines of credit
$
121,516
$
115,233
Commercial and standby letters of credit
3,058
3,935
Commitments to grant loans
25,571
40,507
Unfunded commitments under lines of credit are commitments for possible future extensions of credit to existing customers. These commitments may expire without being drawn upon. Therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
Commercial and standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing, and similar transactions. These commitments to extend credit and letters of credit generally mature within one year. The credit risk involved in these transactions is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. We evaluate each customer's credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary upon the extension of credit, is based on a credit evaluation of the borrower. While we consider standby letters of credit to be guarantees, the amount of the liability related to such guarantees on the commitment date is not significant and a liability related to such guarantees is not recorded on the consolidated balance sheets.
Commitments to grant loans are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The amount of collateral obtained, if it is deemed necessary, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer. Commitments to grant loans include loans committed to be sold to the secondary market.
Our exposure to credit-related loss in the event of nonperformance by the counter parties to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit could be up to the contractual notional amount of those instruments. We use the same credit policies as we do for extending loans to customers. No significant losses are anticipated as a result of these commitments.
Fair Value
We utilize fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Trading securities, AFS securities, and certain liabilities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from
time-to-time
, we may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis, such as mortgage loans AFS, foreclosed assets,
OMSRs
, and certain other assets and liabilities. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve the application of lower of cost or market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.
For further information regarding fair value measurements see “
Note 12 – Fair Value
” of our notes to the interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
54
Table of Contents
Liquidity
Liquidity is monitored regularly by our Market Risk Committee, which consists of members of senior management. The committee reviews projected cash flows, key ratios, and liquidity available from both primary and secondary sources.
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions, trading securities, and
AFS
securities. These categories totaled
$523,550
or
36.1%
of assets as of
June 30, 2013
as compared to
$534,968
or
37.4%
as of
December 31, 2012
. Liquidity is important for financial institutions because of their need to meet loan funding commitments, depositor withdrawal requests, and various other commitments including expansion of operations, investment opportunities, and payment of cash dividends. Liquidity varies significantly daily, based on customer activity.
Our primary source of funds is deposit accounts. We also have the ability to borrow from the
FHLB
, the
FRB
, and through various correspondent banks in the form of federal funds purchased. These funding methods typically carry a higher interest rate than traditional market deposit accounts. Some borrowed funds, including
FHLB
Advances,
FRB
Discount Window Advances, and repurchase agreements, require us to pledge assets, typically in the form of certificates of deposits held in other financial institutions, trading securities, AFS securities, or loans as collateral. As of
June 30, 2013
, we had available lines of credit of
$91,951
.
The following table summarizes our sources and uses of cash for the
six
month periods ended
June 30
:
2013
2012
$ Variance
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
$
14,594
$
11,947
$
2,647
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
(40,760
)
(56,047
)
15,287
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
22,612
35,761
(13,149
)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
(3,554
)
(8,339
)
4,785
Cash and cash equivalents January 1
24,920
28,590
(3,670
)
Cash and cash equivalents June 30
$
21,366
$
20,251
$
1,115
Market Risk
Our primary market risks are interest rate risk and liquidity risk. We have no significant foreign exchange risk and do not utilize interest rate swaps or derivatives, except for interest rate locks and forward loan commitments, in the management of
IRR
. Any changes in foreign exchange rates or commodity prices would have an insignificant impact on our interest income and cash flows.
IRR
is the exposure of our net interest income to changes in interest rates.
IRR
results from the difference in the maturity or repricing frequency of a financial institution's interest earning assets and its interest bearing liabilities.
IRR
is the fundamental method by which financial institutions earn income and create shareholder value. Excessive exposure to
IRR
could pose a significant risk to our earnings and capital.
The
FRB
has adopted a policy requiring us to effectively manage the various risks that can have a material impact on our safety and soundness. The risks include credit, interest rate, liquidity, operational, and reputational. We have policies, procedures, and internal controls for measuring and managing these risks. Specifically, our Funds Management policy and procedures include defining acceptable types and terms of investments and funding sources, liquidity requirements, limits on investments in long term assets, limiting the mismatch in repricing opportunity of assets and liabilities, and the frequency of measuring and reporting to our Board.
The primary technique to measure interest rate risk is simulation analysis. Simulation analysis forecasts the effects on the balance sheet structure and net interest income under a variety of scenarios that incorporate changes in interest rates, the shape of yield curves, interest rate relationships, and loan prepayments. These forecasts are compared against net interest income projected in a stable interest rate environment. While many assets and liabilities reprice either at maturity or in accordance with their contractual terms, several balance sheet components demonstrate characteristics that require an evaluation to more accurately reflect their repricing behavior. Key assumptions in the simulation analysis include prepayments on loans, probable calls of investment securities, changes in market conditions, loan volumes and loan pricing, deposit sensitivity, and customer preferences. These assumptions are inherently uncertain as they are subject to fluctuation and revision in a dynamic environment. As a result, the simulation analysis cannot precisely forecast the impact of rising and falling interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to many other factors, including changes in balance sheet components, interest rate changes, changes in market conditions, and management strategies.
55
Table of Contents
Our interest rate sensitivity is estimated by first forecasting the next twelve months of net interest income under an assumed environment of a constant balance sheet and constant market interest rates (base case). We then compare the results of various simulation analyses to the base case. At
June 30, 2013
, we projected the change in net interest income during the next twelve months assuming market interest rates were to immediately decrease by 100 basis points and increase by 100, 200, 300, and 400 basis points in a parallel fashion over the entire yield curve during the same time period. We did not project scenarios showing decreases in interest rates beyond 100 basis points as this is considered extremely unlikely given current interest rate levels. These projections were based on our assets and liabilities remaining static over the next twelve months, while factoring in probable calls and prepayments of certain investment securities and real estate residential and consumer loans. While it is extremely unlikely that interest rates would immediately increase to these levels, we feel that these extreme scenarios help us identify potential gaps and mismatches in the repricing characteristics of assets and liabilities. We regularly monitor our forecasted net interest income sensitivity to ensure that it remains within established limits.
The following table summarizes our interest rate sensitivity as of:
June 30, 2013
Immediate basis point change assumption (short-term rates)
(100)
0
100
200
300
400
Percent change in net income vs. constant rates
(2.86
)%
—
0.42
%
0.69
%
0.65
%
0.50
%
December 31, 2012
Immediate basis point change assumption (short-term rates)
(100)
0
100
200
300
400
Percent change in net income vs. constant rates
(1.61
)%
—
0.49
%
(1.58
)%
(1.74
)%
(2.16
)%
The secondary method to measure
IRR
is gap analysis. Gap analysis measures the cash flows and/or the earliest repricing of our interest bearing assets and liabilities. This analysis is useful for measuring trends in the repricing characteristics of the balance sheet. Significant assumptions are required in this process because of the embedded repricing options contained in assets and liabilities. Residential real estate and consumer loans allow the borrower to repay the balance prior to maturity without penalty, while commercial and agricultural loans have prepayment penalties. The amount of prepayments is dependent upon many factors, including the interest rate of a given loan in comparison to the current offering rates, the level of sales of used homes, and the overall availability of credit in the market place. Generally, a decrease in interest rates will result in an increase in cash flows from these assets. A significant portion of our securities are callable or have prepayment options. The call and prepayment options are more likely to be exercised in a period of decreasing interest rates. Savings and demand accounts may generally be withdrawn on request without prior notice. The timing of cash flows from these deposits is estimated based on historical experience.
Certificates of deposit
have penalties that discourage early withdrawals.
The following tables provide information about assets and liabilities that are sensitive to changes in interest rates as of
June 30, 2013
and
December 31, 2012
. The principal amounts of assets and time deposits maturing were calculated based on the contractual maturity dates. Savings and NOW accounts are based on management's estimate of their future cash flows. During the first quarter of 2012, we engaged the services of a third party to analyze our historical loan prepayment speeds and non-contractual deposit decay rates. We have reviewed the results of the analyses in detail and feel that it reasonably reflects the prepayment speeds and decay rates of our loan and deposit portfolios.
56
Table of Contents
June 30, 2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Thereafter
Total
Fair Value
Rate sensitive assets
Other interest bearing assets
$
1,647
$
240
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
1,887
$
1,890
Average interest rates
0.86
%
1.25
%
—
—
—
—
0.91
%
Trading securities
$
950
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
950
$
950
Average interest rates
2.83
%
—
—
—
—
—
2.83
%
AFS securities
$
168,609
$
90,752
$
53,417
$
38,028
$
24,252
$
124,366
$
499,424
$
499,424
Average interest rates
1.58
%
1.62
%
1.94
%
2.64
%
2.75
%
2.70
%
2.04
%
Fixed interest rate loans (1)
$
116,839
$
100,362
$
92,019
$
100,014
$
97,363
$
117,502
$
624,099
$
629,549
Average interest rates
5.43
%
5.42
%
5.13
%
4.64
%
4.42
%
4.37
%
4.90
%
Variable interest rate loans (1)
$
82,141
$
30,652
$
19,690
$
17,726
$
18,250
$
10,894
$
179,353
$
179,353
Average interest rates
4.63
%
3.88
%
4.11
%
3.32
%
3.35
%
3.64
%
3.64
%
Rate sensitive liabilities
Borrowed funds
$
109,412
$
33,048
$
10,000
$
30,000
$
40,000
$
40,000
$
262,460
$
266,633
Average interest rates
0.69
%
0.68
%
1.23
%
1.88
%
2.46
%
3.02
%
1.47
%
Savings and NOW accounts
$
38,098
$
34,415
$
30,886
$
27,749
$
24,952
$
265,182
$
421,282
$
421,282
Average interest rates
0.13
%
0.12
%
0.12
%
0.12
%
0.12
%
0.11
%
0.12
%
Fixed interest rate certificates of deposit
$
199,979
$
80,929
$
64,216
$
48,369
$
49,574
$
16,006
$
459,073
$
463,021
Average interest rates
0.95
%
1.71
%
2.11
%
1.87
%
1.41
%
1.64
%
1.42
%
Variable interest rate certificates of deposit
$
637
$
490
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
1,127
$
1,127
Average interest rates
0.42
%
0.42
%
—
—
—
—
0.42
%
December 31, 2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Thereafter
Total
Fair Value
Rate sensitive assets
Other interest bearing assets
$
6,411
$
100
$
240
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
6,751
$
6,761
Average interest rates
0.86
%
0.35
%
1.25
%
—
—
—
0.86
%
Trading securities
$
1,051
$
522
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
1,573
$
1,573
Average interest rates
2.68
%
2.54
%
—
—
—
—
2.63
%
AFS securities
$
124,452
$
83,606
$
49,419
$
42,655
$
35,504
$
168,374
$
504,010
$
504,010
Average interest rates
2.42
%
2.30
%
2.53
%
2.82
%
2.89
%
2.48
%
2.50
%
Fixed interest rate loans (1)
$
138,840
$
96,013
$
91,353
$
85,095
$
109,057
$
89,760
$
610,118
$
622,329
Average interest rates
5.74
%
5.62
%
5.57
%
5.21
%
4.60
%
4.63
%
5.26
%
Variable interest rate loans (1)
$
64,482
$
28,076
$
24,669
$
12,650
$
22,061
$
10,697
$
162,635
$
162,635
Average interest rates
4.90
%
3.77
%
3.96
%
3.89
%
3.36
%
3.90
%
4.21
%
Rate sensitive liabilities
Borrowed funds
$
77,865
$
10,814
$
42,322
$
20,000
$
40,000
$
50,000
$
241,001
$
248,822
Average interest rates
0.46
%
0.65
%
1.14
%
2.67
%
2.15
%
3.03
%
1.59
%
Savings and NOW accounts
$
35,796
$
32,794
$
29,476
$
26,520
$
23,885
$
261,126
$
409,597
$
409,597
Average interest rates
0.13
%
0.13
%
0.12
%
0.12
%
0.12
%
0.11
%
0.12
%
Fixed interest rate certificates of deposit
$
204,972
$
76,373
$
71,685
$
51,232
$
40,523
$
18,399
$
463,184
$
471,479
Average interest rates
1.13
%
1.69
%
2.10
%
2.14
%
1.72
%
1.67
%
1.55
%
Variable interest rate certificates of deposit
$
782
$
369
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
1,151
$
1,151
Average interest rates
0.46
%
0.45
%
—
—
—
—
0.46
%
(1)
The fair value reported is exclusive of the allocation of the
ALLL
.
We do not believe that there has been a material change in the nature or categories of our primary market risk exposure, or the particular markets that present the primary risk of loss. As of the date of this report, we do not know of or expect there to be any material change in the general nature of our primary market risk exposure in the near term. As of the date of this report, we
57
Table of Contents
do not expect to make material changes in those methods in the near term. We may change those methods in the future to adapt to changes in circumstances or to implement new techniques.
Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The information presented in the “
Market Risk
” section of the
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 4 – Controls and Procedures
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ) as of
June 30, 2013
, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of
June 30, 2013
, were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
During the most recent fiscal quarter, no change occurred in our internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or is likely to materially effect, our internal control over financial reporting.
58
Table of Contents
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 – Legal Proceedings
We are not involved in any material legal proceedings. We are involved in ordinary, routine litigation incidental to our business; however, no such routine proceedings are expected to result in any material adverse effect on operations, earnings, or financial condition, or cash flows.
Item 1A – Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2012
.
Item 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(A)
None
(B)
None
(C)
Repurchases of Common Stock
We have adopted and publically announced a common stock repurchase plan. The plan was last amended on
April 26, 2012
, to allow for the repurchase of an additional
150,000
shares of common stock. These authorizations do not have expiration dates. As shares are repurchased under this plan, they are retired and revert back to the status of authorized, but unissued shares.
The following table provides information for the
three month period ended June 30, 2013
, with respect to this plan:
Shares Repurchased
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan or Program
Maximum Number of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
Number
Average Price
Per Share
Balance, March 31, 2013
64,901
April 1 - 30, 2013
7,811
$
25.48
7,811
57,090
May 1 - 31, 2013
7,805
24.98
7,805
49,285
June 1 - 30, 2013
9,700
24.95
9,700
39,585
Total
25,316
$
25.12
25,316
39,585
59
Table of Contents
Item 6 - Exhibits
(a)
Exhibits
31(a)
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by the Principal Executive Officer
31(b)
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by the Principal Financial Officer
32
Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
101.1*
101.INS (XBRL Instance Document)
101.SCH (XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document)
101.CAL (XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document)
101.LAB (XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document)
101.DEF (XBRL Taxonomy Linkbase Document)
101.PRE (XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document)
•
In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulations S-T, the XBRL related information shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be part of any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
60
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Isabella Bank Corporation
Date:
July 29, 2013
/s/ Richard J. Barz
Richard J. Barz
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date:
July 29, 2013
/s/ Dennis P. Angner
Dennis P. Angner
President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer)
61