Companies:
10,793
total market cap:
NZ$234.249 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ NZD
$
USD
๐บ๐ธ
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
Methode Electronics
MEI
#8515
Rank
NZ$0.35 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
NZ$10.12
Share price
1.22%
Change (1 day)
-6.07%
Change (1 year)
๐ Electronics
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Stock Splits
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Annual Reports (10-K)
Methode Electronics
Quarterly Reports (10-Q)
Financial Year FY2012 Q1
Methode Electronics - 10-Q quarterly report FY2012 Q1
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
__________________________________
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the quarterly period ended
July 30, 2011
or
o
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
__________________________________
Commission file number 0-2816
METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter.)
Delaware
36-2090085
(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)
Identification No.)
7401 West Wilson Avenue, Harwood Heights, Illinois
60706-4548
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
(708) 867-6777
None
(Former name, former address, former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
x
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
x
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or smaller reporting company. See definitions of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer
o
Accelerated filer
x
Non-accelerated filer
o
Smaller reporting company
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
x
At
August 30, 2011
, registrant had 37,020,890 shares of common stock outstanding.
Table of Contents
METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC.
FORM 10-Q
July 30, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Financial Statements
Condensed consolidated balance sheets as of July 30, 2011 (unaudited) and April 30, 2011
2
Condensed consolidated statements of operations (unaudited) – Three months ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010
3
Condensed consolidated statements of cash flows (unaudited) – Three months ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010
4
Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements – July 30, 2011
5
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
18
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
27
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
27
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6.
Exhibits
28
SIGNATURES
29
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
30
Table of Contents
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1 - Financial Statements
METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)
As of
As of
July 30, 2011
April 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
$
84,426
$
57,445
Accounts receivable, net
83,996
88,036
Inventories:
Finished products
7,703
6,271
Work in process
12,436
10,981
Materials
20,263
21,305
40,402
38,557
Deferred income taxes
3,735
3,778
Prepaid and refundable income taxes
829
851
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
9,280
7,294
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
222,668
195,961
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
298,359
298,254
Less allowances for depreciation
236,471
236,743
61,888
61,511
GOODWILL
16,422
16,422
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net
17,961
18,423
PRE-PRODUCTION COSTS
14,923
14,645
OTHER ASSETS
27,345
27,782
76,651
77,272
TOTAL ASSETS
$
361,207
$
334,744
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable
$
37,772
$
37,152
Other current liabilities
27,024
25,703
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
64,796
62,855
LONG-TERM DEBT
27,000
—
OTHER LIABILITIES
5,279
8,138
DEFERRED COMPENSATION
4,773
2,607
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock, $0.50 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 38,363,078 and 38,312,243 shares issued as of July 30, 2011 and April 30, 2011, respectively
19,182
19,156
Additional paid-in capital
74,002
72,113
Accumulated other comprehensive income
21,195
23,152
Treasury stock, 1,342,188 shares as of July 30, 2011 and April 30, 2011
(11,377
)
(11,377
)
Retained earnings
154,894
155,989
TOTAL METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
257,896
259,033
Noncontrolling interest
1,463
2,111
TOTAL EQUITY
259,359
261,144
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$
361,207
$
334,744
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended
July 30,
2011
July 31,
2010
Net sales
$
110,804
$
98,973
Cost of products sold
90,824
79,529
Gross Margins
19,980
19,444
Selling and administrative expenses
18,562
15,595
Income from operations
1,418
3,849
Interest expense, net
4
26
Other income, net
(43
)
(849
)
Income before income taxes
1,457
4,672
Income tax expense
22
642
Net income
1,435
4,030
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
(59
)
(35
)
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC.
$
1,494
4,065
Amounts per common share attributable to Methode Electronics, Inc.:
Basic
$
0.04
$
0.11
Diluted
$
0.04
$
0.11
Cash dividends:
Common stock
$
0.07
$
0.07
Weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding:
Basic
37,277,306
37,045,771
Diluted
37,518,183
37,289,671
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(in thousands)
Three Months Ended
July 30, 2011
July 31, 2010
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
$
1,435
$
4,030
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities:
Provision for depreciation
3,439
3,356
Amortization of intangibles
462
556
Amortization of stock awards and stock options
1,110
342
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
(231
)
(10,518
)
Other
286
22
NET CASH PROVIDED BY/(USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES
6,501
(2,212
)
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
(4,553
)
(1,956
)
Purchase of investment
—
(750
)
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
(4,553
)
(2,706
)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
198
13
Cash dividends
(2,589
)
(2,576
)
Net borrowings
27,000
—
NET CASH PROVIDED BY/(USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES
24,609
(2,563
)
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash
424
109
INCREASE/(DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
26,981
(7,372
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
57,445
63,821
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
$
84,426
$
56,449
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
July 30, 2011
1.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Methode Electronics, Inc. was incorporated in 1946 as an Illinois corporation and reincorporated in Delaware in 1966. As used herein, “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company” or “Methode” means Methode Electronics, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Our business is managed and our financial results are reported on a segment basis, with those segments being Automotive, Interconnect, Power Products and Other. The condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures as of
July 30, 2011
and results of operations for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
and
July 31, 2010
are unaudited, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The
April 30, 2011
condensed consolidated balance sheet was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In our opinion, these financial statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for the fair statement of the results for the interim periods. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in our Form 10-K for the year ended
April 30, 2011
filed with the SEC on June 30, 2011. Results may vary from quarter to quarter for reasons other than seasonality.
2.
RECENTLY ADOPTED AND ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, ("FASB"), issued Accounting Standards Update, ("ASU"), 2009-13, "Revenue Recognition - Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements - a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force," which amends FASB ASC 605, Revenue Recognition, by modifying the criteria used to separate elements in a multiple-element arrangement, introducing the concept of "best estimate of selling price" for determining the selling price of a deliverable, requiring use of the relative selling price method and prohibiting use of the residual method to allocate arrangement consideration among units of accounting, and expanding the disclosure requirements for all multiple-element arrangements within the scope of FASB ASC 605-25. The amended guidance is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, which is our current fiscal year that began May 1, 2011. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on our financial statements.
In December 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance regarding ASC No. 805, "Business Combinations," on the
disclosure of supplementary pro forma information for business combinations. ASC No. 805 requires a public entity to disclose pro forma information for business combinations that occurred in the current reporting period. The disclosures include pro forma revenue and earnings of the combined entity for the current reporting period as though the acquisition date for all business combinations that occurred during the year had been of the beginning of the annual reporting period.
If comparable financial statements are presented, the pro forma revenue and earnings of the combined entity for the comparable prior reporting period should be reported as though the acquisition date for all business combinations that occurred
during the current year had been as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period. This guidance specifies that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combinations that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. This guidance is effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after May 1, 2011, the beginning of our 2012 fiscal year. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, "Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS," which results in common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS. Consequently, the amendments change the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. ASU 2011-04 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, which will be our fiscal 2012 third quarter beginning January 29, 2012. The adoption of this update is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.
5
METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, "Comprehensive Income" which requires companies to present the components of net income and other comprehensive income either as one continuous statement or as two consecutive statements. It eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. We will adopt this pronouncement for our fiscal year beginning April 29, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
3.
RESTRUCTURINGS
March 2009 Restructuring
In March 2009, we announced restructuring initiatives to consolidate our manufacturing facilities to reduce costs. All of the March 2009 restructuring initiatives were complete as of the end of fiscal 2010. At the end of fiscal 2011, we had an accrued restructuring liability of $280 reflected in the current liabilities section of our condensed consolidated balance sheet. We expect this liability to be paid out by the end of fiscal 2012.
The table below reflects the activity related to the March 2009 restructuring for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
:
Other Costs
Accrued balance at April 30, 2011
$
280
Payments during the first quarter of fiscal 2012
—
Accrued balance at July 30, 2011
$
280
4.
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)
The components of our comprehensive income/(loss) for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
and
July 31, 2010
include net income/(loss) and adjustments to stockholders’ equity for foreign currency translations. The foreign currency translation adjustment was due to exchange rate fluctuations in our foreign affiliates’ local currency versus the U.S. dollar.
The following table presents details of our comprehensive income/(loss):
Three Months Ended July 30, 2011
Methode
Noncontrolling
Total
Shareholders
Interest
Net income/(loss)
$
1,435
$
1,494
$
(59
)
Translation adjustment
(1,941
)
(1,957
)
16
Total comprehensive loss
$
(506
)
$
(463
)
$
(43
)
Three Months Ended July 31, 2010
Methode
Noncontrolling
Total
Shareholders
Interest
Net income/(loss)
$
4,030
4,065
$
(35
)
Translation adjustment
(775
)
(808
)
33
Total comprehensive income/(loss)
$
3,255
$
3,257
$
(2
)
6
METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
5.
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
We review our goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable, and we also review our goodwill and indefinite-lived assets annually in accordance with ASC No. 350, “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other”. The values assigned to goodwill and intangible assets are normally based on estimates and judgments regarding expectations for the success and life cycle of products and technologies acquired. A severe decline in expectations could result in significant impairment charges, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
The following tables show the roll-forward of goodwill in the financial statements for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
and
July 31, 2010
. There was no activity for either period presented.
Three Months Ended July 30, 2011
Power
Interconnect
Products
Total
Balance as of April 30, 2011
$
11,146
$
5,276
$
16,422
Attributable to acquisitions
—
—
—
Adjustments due to earn-out
—
—
—
Adjustments due to finalization of purchase price allocation
—
—
—
Balance as of July 30, 2011
$
11,146
$
5,276
$
16,422
Three Months Ended July 31, 2010
Power
Interconnect
Products
Total
Balance as of May 1, 2010
$
11,146
$
950
$
12,096
Attributable to acquisitions
—
—
—
Adjustments due to earn-out
—
—
—
Adjustments due to finalization of purchase price allocation
—
—
—
Balance as of July 31, 2010
$
11,146
$
950
$
12,096
The following tables present details of the Company’s intangible assets:
As of July 30, 2011
Wtd. Avg.
Remaining
Accumulated
Amortization
Gross
Amortization
Net
Periods (Years)
Customer relationships and agreements
$
14,995
$
13,504
$
1,491
12.4
Trade names, patents and technology licenses
25,774
9,340
16,434
12.3
Covenants not to compete
480
444
36
0.6
Total
$
41,249
$
23,288
$
17,961
7
METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
As of April 30, 2011
Wtd. Avg.
Remaining
Accumulated
Amortization
Gross
Amortization
Net
Periods (Years)
Customer relationships and agreements
$
14,995
$
13,417
$
1,578
12.7
Trade names, patents and technology licenses
25,774
8,978
16,796
12.4
Covenants not to compete
480
431
49
0.8
Total
$
41,249
$
22,826
$
18,423
The estimated aggregate amortization expense for the current fiscal year and each of the four succeeding fiscal years is as follows:
2012
$
1,804
2013
1,525
2014
1,481
2015
1,469
2016
1,317
As of
July 30, 2011
and
April 30, 2011
, the trade names, patents and technology licenses include $1,800 of trade names that are not subject to amortization.
6.
INCOME TAXES
At
July 30, 2011
and
April 30, 2011
, we had valuation allowances against our deferred tax assets of $56,118 and $54,015, respectively. In accordance with ASC No. 740, “Income Taxes,” a valuation allowance is required to be recorded when it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will not be realized. Future realization depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income within the carry-forward period available under the tax laws. Sources of future taxable income include future reversals of taxable temporary differences, future taxable income exclusive of reversing taxable differences, taxable income in carry-back years and tax planning strategies. These sources of positive evidence of realizability must be weighed against negative evidence, such as cumulative losses in recent years.
In forming a judgment about the future realization of our deferred tax assets, we considered both the positive and negative evidence of realizability and gave significant weight to the negative evidence from our recent cumulative loss in the U.S. We will continue to assess this situation and make appropriate adjustments to the valuation allowance based on our evaluation of the positive and negative evidence existing at the time. We are currently unable to forecast when there will be sufficient positive evidence for us to reverse the valuation allowances that we have recorded.
The valuation allowance is associated with the deferred tax assets for the differences between book and tax that result from net operating losses (NOLs), foreign investment tax credits with unlimited carryovers generated in the current and prior years and temporary differences which become deductible when the related asset is recovered or related liability is settled.
A reconciliation of the consolidated provisions for income taxes to amounts determined by applying the prevailing statutory federal income tax rate to pre-tax earnings is as follows:
8
METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
Three Months Ended
July 30,
2011
July 31,
2010
Income tax provision at statutory rate
$
531
$
1,648
Effect of:
State income taxes, net of federal benefit
23
26
Foreign operations with lower statutory rates
(2,507
)
(2,657
)
Valuation allowance
1,933
2,053
Uncertain tax positions
(23
)
—
Other, net
65
(428
)
Income tax provision
$
22
$
642
We recognize interest and penalties accrued related to the unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for income taxes. During the
three
months ended
July 30, 2011
, we recognized an expense of $1 in interest and zero in penalties. We had approximately $325 accrued at
July 30, 2011
for the payment of interest and penalties. The total unrecognized tax benefit as of
July 30, 2011
was $338.
9
METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits:
Balance at April 30, 2011
$
375
Increases for positions related to the current year
—
Decreases for positions related to the prior years
—
Settlements
(37
)
Lapsing of statutes of limitations
—
Balance at July 30, 2011
$
338
We believe that it is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will change within the next twelve months. We have certain tax return years subject to statutes of limitation, which will close within twelve months of the end of the quarter. Unless challenged by tax authorities, the closure of those statutes of limitation is expected to result in the recognition of uncertain tax positions of approximately $37.
The Company and all of its domestic subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various states. Our foreign subsidiaries file income tax returns in certain foreign jurisdictions since they have operations outside the U.S. The Company and its subsidiaries are generally no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local examinations by tax authorities for all years except fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009.
7.
COMMON STOCK AND STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth the changes in the number of issued shares of common stock during the three-month periods presented:
Three Months Ended
July 30,
2011
July 31,
2010
Balance at the beginning of the period
38,312,243
38,149,946
Options exercised
21,975
1,350
Restricted stock awards vested
28,860
24,000
Balance at the end of the period
38,363,078
38,175,296
On July 29, 2011, we paid a quarterly dividend of $2,589.
Stock Options Granted Under the 2010 Stock Plan
In July 2011, the Compensation Committee approved the grant of options to purchase 128,000 shares of our common stock to our executive officers. The stock options have a ten-year term and will vest 33.3% each year over a three-year period. The exercise price is the closing price on the date granted.
The following tables summarize the stock option activity and related information for the stock options granted under the 2010 stock plan for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
:
Summary of Option Activity
Shares
Wtd. Avg. Exercise Price
Outstanding at April 30, 2011
128,000
$
9.24
Granted
128,000
10.70
Exercised
—
—
Cancelled
—
—
Outstanding at July 30, 2011
256,000
$
9.97
10
Table of Contents
Options Outstanding
at July 30, 2011
Exercise Price
Shares
Avg. Remaining Life (Years)
$
9.24
128,000
9.2
$
10.70
128,000
10.0
The options outstanding had an intrinsic value of $172 at
July 30, 2011
. The intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the first quarter of fiscal 2012 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on
July 30, 2011
.
We estimated the fair value of our employee stock options on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
Fiscal 2011
Fiscal 2012
Awards
Awards
Average expected volatility
85.83
%
52.76
%
Average risk-free interest rate
0.60
%
0.63
%
Dividend yield
3.49
%
2.66
%
Expected life of options
7.03 years
7.03 years
Weighted-average grant-date fair value
$
5.19
$
4.27
We recognized pre-tax compensation expense for stock options granted under the 2010 stock plan of $109 for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
and zero for the
three
months ended July 31, 2010. We record the compensation expense related to the stock options in the selling and administrative section of our condensed consolidated statement of operations.
Restricted Stock Awards and Restricted Stock Units Granted Under the 2010 Stock Plan
Our Compensation Committee awarded 640,000 shares of common stock subject to performance-based restricted stock awards to certain members of management during the third quarter of fiscal 2011. The performance measure will be the Company's internal enterprise value at the end of fiscal 2015. The internal enterprise value shall equal the product of (i) fiscal 2015 EBITDA and (ii) 7.5 (the historic multiple of EBITDA), subject to an adjustment for cash, short-term investments, debt, preferred stock, certain equity issuances, certain acquisitions and the changes in the dividend rate. The restricted stock awards will vest, i.e., the restrictions will lapse, at the end of the five-year performance period to the extent the performance goals have been achieved. The remaining shares will be forfeited.
Our Compensation Committee awarded 320,000 shares of common stock subject to time-based restricted stock units to certain members of management during the third quarter of fiscal 2011. The restricted stock units will vest 20% each year on the last day of our fiscal year and be 100% vested on the last day of fiscal 2015 provided the executive remains employed.
The following table summarizes the RSA and RSU activity for the
three
months ended
July 30, 2011
for the RSA's and RSU's granted under the 2010 stock plan:
RSA
RSU
Shares
Shares
Unvested and unissued at April 30, 2011
640,000
320,000
Awarded
—
—
Vested
—
—
Forfeited and Cancelled
—
—
Unvested and unissued at July 30, 2011
640,000
320,000
11
Table of Contents
Weighted Average Value
Probable Unearned Compensation Expense at
Target Unearned Compensation Expense at
Grant Fiscal Year
Number of Shares
Vesting Period
July 30, 2011
July 30, 2011
2011
640,000
5-year cliff, performance based
$
9.70
$
4,817
$
4,817
2011
320,000
5-year, equal annual installments
9.70
1,629
N/A
We recognized pre-tax compensation expense for RSAs issued under the 2010 stock plan of $548 and zero for the three months ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010, respectively. We record the expense in the selling and administrative section of our condensed consolidated statement of operations.
Stock Options Granted Under the 2007 Stock Plan
The following tables summarize the stock option activity and related information for the stock options granted under the 2007 stock plan for the
three
months ended
July 30, 2011
:
Summary of Option Activity
Wtd. Avg.
Shares
Exercise Price
Outstanding at April 30, 2011
720,500
$
5.77
Granted
—
—
Exercised
—
—
Cancelled
—
—
Outstanding at July 30, 2011
720,500
$
5.77
Options Outstanding
at July 30, 2011
Avg.
Remaining
Exercise Price
Shares
Life (Years)
$
2.72
285,000
7.6
$
6.46
275,000
7.9
$
8.13
35,500
8.4
$
10.55
125,000
9.0
$
5.77
720,500
The options outstanding had an intrinsic value of $3,464 at
July 30, 2011
.
We estimated the fair value of our employee stock options on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
Fiscal 2009
Fiscal 2010
Fiscal 2011
Awards
Awards
Awards
Average expected volatility
69.58
%
86.88
%
85.59
%
Average risk-free interest rate
1.39
%
1.43
%
1.09
%
Dividend yield
2.26
%
2.77
%
3.63
%
Expected life of options
6.87 years
6.87 years
7.03 years
Weighted-average grant-date fair value
$
1.46
$
4.02
$
5.88
We recognized pre-tax compensation expense for stock options granted under the 2007 stock plan of $144 and $66 for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
and
July 31, 2010
, respectively. We record the compensation expense related to the stock options in the selling and administrative section of our condensed consolidated statement of operations.
12
Table of Contents
Restricted Stock Awards Granted Under the 2007 Stock Plan
In April 2007, 225,000 shares of common stock subject to performance-based Restricted Stock Awards (RSAs) granted to our CEO in fiscal 2006 and 2007 were converted to Restricted Stock Units (RSUs). The RSUs were subject to the same vesting schedule and other major provisions of the RSAs they replaced, except the shares for stock underlying the RSUs will not be issued and delivered until the earlier of: (1) thirty days after the CEO’s date of termination of employment with the Company and all of its subsidiaries and affiliates; or (2) the last day of our fiscal year in which the payment of common stock in satisfaction of the RSUs becomes deductible to the Company under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The RSUs are not entitled to voting rights or the payment of dividends. The RSU’s are fully vested as of
July 30, 2011
. As of
July 30, 2011
, no shares have been delivered pursuant to the RSUs.
At the beginning of fiscal 2012, there were no RSAs outstanding related to the 2007 stock plan. During the three months ended July 30, 2011, we awarded 28,860 restricted shares to our independent directors, all of which vested immediately upon grant.
We recognized pre-tax compensation expense for RSAs issued under the 2007 stock plan of $309 and $276 for the three months ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010, respectively. We record the expense in the selling and administrative section of our condensed consolidated statement of operations.
Stock Options Granted Under the 2000 and 2004 Stock Plans
Options to purchase 259,537 shares of our common stock were granted in previous years under the 2000 and 2004 stock plans and are outstanding and exercisable as of
July 30, 2011
. There was no remaining compensation expense related to these options in the first quarter of fiscal 2012.
The following tables summarize the stock option activity and related information for the stock options granted under the 2000 and 2004 stock plans for the
three
months ended
July 30, 2011
:
Summary of Option Activity
Wtd. Avg.
Shares
Exercise Price
Outstanding at April 30, 2011
282,767
$
10.82
Exercised
(21,975
)
9.02
Forfeited and Expired
(1,255
)
11.44
Outstanding at July 30, 2011
259,537
$
10.97
Options Outstanding and
Exercisable at July 30, 2011
Wtd. Avg.
Avg.
Range of
Exercise
Remaining
Exercise Prices
Shares
Price
Life (Years)
$9.03 - $11.44
259,537
$
10.97
1.4
The options outstanding had an intrinsic value of $10 at
July 30, 2011
.
13
Table of Contents
8.
NET INCOME PER SHARE
Basic net income per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the applicable period. Diluted income per share is calculated after adjusting the denominator of the basic income per share calculation for the effect of all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share:
Three Months Ended
July 30,
2011
July 31,
2010
Numerator - net income attributable to Methode Electronics, Inc.
$
1,494
4,065
Denominator:
—
—
Denominator for basic income per share-weighted average shares
37,277,306
37,045,771
Dilutive potential common shares-employee stock options
240,877
243,900
Denominator for diluted loss per share adjusted weighted average shares and assumed conversions
37,518,183
37,289,671
Net income per share:
Basic and diluted
$
0.04
$
0.11
For the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, options to purchase 129,935 shares of common stock at a weighted-average exercise price of $11.44 per share were outstanding, but were not included in the computation of net income per share because the exercise prices were greater than the average market price of $11.01 for our common stock for the first three months of fiscal 2012, and, therefore, the effect would have been anti-dilutive. For the three months ended July 31, 2010, options to purchase 395,867 shares of common stock at a weighted-average exercise price of $10.84 per share were outstanding, but were not included in the computation of net income per share because the exercise prices were greater than the average market price of $10.37 for our common stock for the first three months of fiscal 2011, and, therefore, the effect would have been anti-dilutive.
9.
SEGMENT INFORMATION
We are a global manufacturer of component and subsystem devices. We design, manufacture and market devices employing electrical, electronic, wireless, sensing and optical technologies. Our components are found in the primary end markets of the automotive, appliance, communications (including information processing and storage, networking equipment, wireless and terrestrial voice/data systems), aerospace, rail and other transportation industries; and the consumer and industrial equipment markets.
ASC No. 280, “Segment Reporting” (“ASC No. 280”), establishes annual and interim reporting standards for an enterprise’s operating segments and related disclosures about its products, services, geographic areas and major customers. An operating segment is defined as a component of an enterprise that engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses, and about which separate financial information is regularly evaluated by the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) in deciding how to allocate resources. The CODM, as defined by ASC No. 280, is the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer.
The Automotive segment supplies electronic and electromechanical devices and related products to automobile OEMs, either directly or through their tiered suppliers, including control switches for electrical power and signals, connectors for electrical devices, integrated control components, switches and sensors that monitor the operation or status of a component or system, and packaging of electrical components.
The Interconnect segment provides a variety of copper and fiber-optic interconnect and interface solutions for the appliance, computer, networking, telecommunications, storage, medical, military, aerospace, commercial and consumer markets. Solutions include solid-state field effect interface panels, PC and express card packaging, optical and copper transceivers, terminators, custom cable assemblies and conductive polymer and thick film inks. Services include the design
14
Table of Contents
and installation of fiber optic and copper infrastructure systems, and the manufacture of active and passive optical components.
The Power Products segment manufactures current-carrying laminated bus devices, custom power-product assemblies, powder coated bus bars, braided flexible cables and high-current low voltage flexible power cabling systems that are used in various markets and applications, including telecommunications, computers, transportation, industrial and power conversion, insulated gate bipolar transistor solutions, aerospace and military.
The Other segment includes a designer and manufacturer of magnetic torque sensing products, and independent laboratories that provide services for qualification testing and certification, and analysis of electronic and optical components.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
April 30, 2011
. We allocate resources to segments based on operating income. Transfers between segments are recorded using internal transfer prices set by us. The following tables represent information regarding our segments:
Three Months Ended July 30, 2011
Automotive
Interconnect
Power
Products
Other
Eliminations/Corporate
Consolidated
Net sales
$
63,366
$
33,514
$
12,891
$
2,946
$
(1,913
)
$
110,804
Transfers between segments
(689
)
(1,126
)
(45
)
(16
)
1,876
—
Net sales to unaffiliated customers
$
62,677
$
32,388
$
12,846
$
2,930
$
(37
)
$
110,804
Income (loss) from operations
$
2,246
$
4,297
$
222
$
(999
)
$
(4,348
)
$
1,418
Interest (income)/expense, net
(70
)
21
—
—
53
4
Other (income)/expense, net
36
300
96
3
(478
)
(43
)
Income/(loss) before income taxes
$
2,280
$
3,976
$
126
$
(1,002
)
$
(3,923
)
$
1,457
Three Months Ended July 31, 2010
Automotive
Interconnect
Power
Products
Other
Eliminations/Corporate
Consolidated
Net sales
$
49,945
$
34,762
$
11,626
$
2,900
$
(260
)
$
98,973
Transfers between segments
—
(152
)
(77
)
(38
)
267
—
Net sales to unaffiliated customers
$
49,945
$
34,610
$
11,549
$
2,862
$
7
$
98,973
Income/(loss) from operations
$
2,889
$
3,783
$
554
$
(572
)
$
(2,805
)
$
3,849
Interest (income)/expense, net
(65
)
(68
)
—
—
159
26
Other (income)/expense, net
132
170
48
1
(1,200
)
(849
)
Income/(loss) before income taxes
$
2,822
$
3,681
$
506
$
(573
)
$
(1,764
)
$
4,672
10. CONTINGENCIES
Certain litigation arising in the normal course of business is pending against us. We are from time to time subject to various legal actions and claims incidental to our business, including those arising out of alleged defects, breach of contracts, employment-related matters and environmental matters. We consider insurance coverage and third-party indemnification when determining required accruals for pending litigation and claims. Although the outcome of potential legal actions and claims cannot be determined, it is our opinion, based on the information available, that we have adequate reserves for these liabilities.
15
Table of Contents
Delphi Related Litigation
On September 4, 2008, Methode and Delphi Automotive Systems LLC (“Delphi”) entered into a supply agreement pursuant to which Methode was to supply all of Delphi’s requirements for the seat bladders used in Delphi’s occupant restraint system from October 1, 2008 through September 30, 2011. On August 26, 2009, Delphi notified us that effective September 10, 2009, our supply arrangement was terminated. We are contesting Delphi’s right to terminate this long-term supply arrangement and the parties are engaged in litigation regarding this supply agreement and our related intellectual property.
In March 2010, DPH Holdings Corp., as successor to Delphi Corporation, served the Company with a complaint seeking to recover approximately $19,726 in alleged preference payments that Delphi made to the Company within the 90-day preference period preceding Delphi’s bankruptcy filing. The Company is seeking to dismiss the Delphi preference complaint based on violations of due process and the Company possesses several other substantive defenses.
11. PRE-PRODUCTION COSTS RELATED TO LONG-TERM SUPPLY ARRANGEMENTS
We incur pre-production tooling costs related to certain products produced for our customers under long-term supply agreements. We had
$14,923
and $14,645 as of
July 30, 2011
and
April 30, 2011
, respectively, of pre-production tooling costs related to customer-owned tools for which reimbursement is contractually guaranteed by the customer or for which the customer has provided a non-cancelable right to use the tooling. The unreimbursed costs incurred related to customer-owned tooling, for which we have the right to use, that are not subject to reimbursement are capitalized and depreciated over the expected life of the tooling or the life of the related vehicle program, whichever is shorter. Engineering, testing and other costs incurred in the design and development of production parts are expensed as incurred, unless the costs are reimbursable, as specified in a customer contract. These amounts are included in our other non-current assets section as they're stated on the face of the balance sheet under "pre-production costs". Net revenues and costs on projects are deferred and recognized over the life of the related long-term supply agreement on a gross basis in the consolidated statement of operations.
12. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
ASC No. 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.
ASC No. 820 also specifies a fair value hierarchy based upon the observation of inputs in valuation techniques. Observable inputs (highest level) reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs (lowest level) reflect internally developed market assumptions. In accordance with ASC No. 820, fair value measurements are classified under the following hierarchy:
·
Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
·
Level 2 — Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, or other inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
·
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.
Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value are valued using quoted market prices or under a market approach using other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable instruments and included in a table below which summarizes the fair value of assets and liabilities as of
July 30, 2011
:
16
Table of Contents
Fair Value Measurement Used
Recorded Value
Quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments
Quoted prices in active markets for similar instruments
Other unobservable inputs
(Level 1)
(Level 2)
(Level 3)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
(1)
$
84,426
$
84,426
$
—
$
—
Assets related to deferred compensation plan
3,917
—
3,917
—
Total assets at fair value
$
88,343
$
84,426
$
3,917
$
—
Liabilities:
Liabilities related to deferred compensation plan
$
3,001
$
3,001
$
—
$
—
Total liabilities at fair value
$
3,001
$
3,001
$
—
$
—
(1)
Includes cash, money-market investments and certificates of deposit
.
Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments. The carrying values of our short-term financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and short-term debt approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.
13. DEBT AND CREDIT AGREEMENT
On February 25, 2011, we entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and certain other financial institutions, which amends and restates our previous credit facility and extends the maturity to February 25, 2016. The new credit facility is in the aggregate principal amount of $75,000, with an option to increase the principal amount by an additional $25,000 subject to customary conditions and approval of the lender(s) providing new commitment(s). The new credit facility provides for variable rates of interest based on the type of borrowing and the Company's debt to EBITDA financial ratio. The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement is guaranteed by certain of our U.S. subsidiaries. At
July 30, 2011
, we were in compliance with the covenants of the agreement. During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, we had borrowings of $27,000 and interest payments of $108. As of
July 30, 2011
, there were outstanding balances due against the credit facility of $27,000.
14. ACQUISITIONS
At the beginning of fiscal 2012, we had an investment in Eetrex of $2,720, for a 70% ownership in their stock. Eetrex is located in Boulder, Colorado and is a developer and manufacturer of chargers, inverters and battery systems for hybrid and plug-in hybrid electronic vehicles. In July 2011, we paid an additional $600 and acquired an additional 10% of their stock, for a total 80% ownership. We have an additional option to acquire an additional 10% of Eetrex between September 1, 2011 and October 31, 2011 for $480. In the event we exercise the option to purchase the additional 10%, each of the existing stockholders of Eetrex will have the right to exercise put options, requiring us to purchase their remaining shares after the end of fiscal 2014 or 2016, and we will have an option to purchase any remaining shares after the end of fiscal 2016. The purchase price will be based on a percentage of net sales recorded since March 2011 of between 2.0% and 3.5%.
17
Table of Contents
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Cautionary Statement
Certain statements in this report are forward-looking statements that are subject to certain risks and uncertainties. We undertake no duty to update any such forward-looking statements to conform to actual results or changes in our expectations. Our business is highly dependent upon two large automotive customers and specific makes and models of automobiles. Our results will be subject to many of the same risks that apply to the automotive, appliance, computer and telecommunications industries, such as general economic conditions, interest rates, consumer spending patterns and technological changes. Other factors, which may result in materially different results for future periods, include the following risk factors. These risk factors should be considered in connection with evaluating the forward-looking statements contained in this report because these factors could cause our actual results and condition to differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements in this report are subject to the safe harbor protection provided under the securities laws and are made as of the date of this report.
•
We depend on a small number of large customers, specifically two large automotive customers. If we were to lose either of these customers or experienced a significant decline in the volume of products purchased by these customers, or if either of these customers declare bankruptcy, our future results could be adversely affected.
•
Because we derive a substantial portion of our revenues from customers in the automotive, appliance, computer and communications industries, we are susceptible to trends and factors affecting those industries.
•
Further downturns in the automotive industry or the bankruptcy of certain automotive customers could reduce the sales and profitability of our business.
•
Our technology-based business and the markets in which we operate are highly competitive. If we are unable to compete effectively, our sales will decline.
•
We face risks relating to our international operations, including political and economic instability, expropriation, or the imposition of government controls.
•
We are dependent on the availability and price of materials.
•
Disruption of our supply chain could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
•
We may be unable to keep pace with rapid technological changes, which would adversely affect our business.
•
Products we manufacture may contain design or manufacturing defects that could result in reduced demand for our products or services and liability claims against us.
•
If we are unable to protect our intellectual property or we infringe, or are alleged to infringe, on another person’s intellectual property, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.
•
We are subject to continuing pressure to lower our prices.
•
We were awarded new North American automotive business in fiscal 2011 for programs that will not begin production until fiscal 2013. We anticipate that it will take a significant amount of our cash and resources to launch these programs.
•
We currently have a significant amount of our cash located outside the U.S. and we may suffer adverse tax consequences if we repatriate this cash.
•
A significant fluctuation between the U.S. dollar and other currencies could adversely impact our operating results.
•
We may acquire businesses or divest business operations. These transactions may pose significant risks and may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
•
We could suffer significant business interruptions, which could adversely affect our sales and operating results.
18
Table of Contents
•
Unfavorable tax law changes may adversely affect results.
•
We cannot ensure that the newly acquired Eetrex business will be successful or that we can implement and profit from any new applications of the acquired technology.
•
The future trading price of our common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a variety of factors.
Any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results, developments and business decisions may differ materially from those foreseen in such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of the report, press release, statement, document, webcast or oral discussion in which they are made. We do not intend to update any forward-looking statements, all of which are expressly qualified by the foregoing. See Part I — Item 1A, Risk Factors of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011, for a further discussion regarding some of the reasons that actual results may be materially different from those we anticipate.
Overview
We are a global manufacturer of component and subsystem devices with manufacturing, design and testing facilities in China, Germany, India, Lebanon, Malta, Mexico, the Philippines, Singapore, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States. We are a global designer and manufacturer of electronic and electro-mechanical devices. We design, manufacture and market devices employing electrical, radio remote control, electronic, wireless, sensing and optical technologies. Our business is managed on a segment basis, with those segments being Automotive, Interconnect, Power Products and Other. For more information regarding the business and products of these segments, see “Item 1. Business.” of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
April 30, 2011
.
Our components are found in the primary end markets of the aerospace, appliance, automotive, construction, consumer and industrial equipment markets, communications (including information processing and storage, networking equipment, wireless and terrestrial voice/data systems), rail and other transportation industries
Recent Transactions
In July 2011, we paid $0.6 million for an additional 10% investment, for a total 80% ownership, in Eetrex Incorporated to facilitate our expansion into the electric vehicle market. Eetrex is located in Boulder, Colorado and is a developer and manufacturer of chargers, inverters and battery systems for hybrid and plug-in hybrid electronic vehicles.
Business Outlook
Looking at the remainder of fiscal 2012, o
ur European businesses may experience softness as slowing demand continues to roll through Europe because of the debt crisis affecting both internal and export demand. Because of these economic conditions, we intend to implement actions to reduce selling and administrative expenses in Europe. We expect our North American automotive customers’ production to soften as the economy continues to struggle. Recent events in the Middle East have resulted in significantly higher oil prices, which are expected to continue to result in higher prices for oil-based commodities, such as resins. We anticipate sales of Power Products to improve modestly as we expand with new customers and markets. While Interconnect sales to our industrial customers should modestly increase, sales to our customers in the appliance industry will continue to be soft until unemployment and home sales improve. We expect to continue to experience vendor supply issues for new automotive products that began production in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 until our in-house capabilities are brought on-line in late fiscal 2012. We anticipate carrying higher design, development and engineering costs through fiscal 2012 to support the multiple product launches and new product development in fiscal 2013. Additionally, sales of product using our torque sensing technology have been slower to materialize that expected. The Company maintains a positive long-term outlook for its global business and is committed to developing new product solutions for our customers and to making strategic capital investments as it pursues its growth strategy.
Results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted. See “Item 1A Risk Factors” of our Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended
April 30, 2011
.
19
Table of Contents
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended
July 30, 2011
as Compared to the Three Months Ended
July 31, 2010
Consolidated Results
Below is a table summarizing results for the three months ended:
(in millions)
(“N/M” equals not meaningful)
July 30,
2011
July 31,
2010
Net Change
Net Change
Net sales
$
110.8
$
99.0
$
11.8
11.9
%
Cost of products sold
90.8
79.5
11.3
14.2
%
Gross margins
20.0
19.5
0.5
2.6
%
Selling and administrative expenses
18.6
15.6
3.0
19.2
%
Other income, net
—
(0.8
)
0.8
N/M
Income tax expense
—
0.6
(0.6
)
N/M
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
(0.1
)
—
(0.1
)
N/M
Net income attributable to Methode Electronics, Inc.
$
1.5
$
4.1
$
(2.6
)
(63.4
)%
Percent of sales:
July 30,
2011
July 31,
2010
Net sales
100.0
%
100.0
%
Cost of products sold
81.9
%
80.3
%
Gross margins
18.1
%
19.7
%
Selling and administrative expenses
16.8
%
15.8
%
Other income, net
—
%
(0.8
)%
Income tax expense
—
%
0.6
%
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
(0.1
)%
—
%
Net income attributable to Methode Electronics, Inc.
1.4
%
4.1
%
Net Sales
. Consolidated net sales increased
$11.8
million, or
11.9%
, to
$110.8
million for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, from
$99.0
million for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
. The Automotive segment net sales increased
$12.7
million, or
25.4%
, to
$62.7
million for the
first
quarter of fiscal
2012
, from
$50.0
million for the
first
quarter of fiscal
2011
. The Interconnect segment net sales decreased
$2.2
million, or
6.4%
, to
$32.4
million for the
first
quarter of fiscal
2012
, compared to
$34.6
million for the
first
quarter of fiscal
2011
. The Power Products segment net sales increased
$1.3
million, or
11.3%
, to
$12.8
million for the
first
quarter of fiscal
2012
, as compared to
$11.5
million for the
first
quarter of fiscal
2011
. The Other segment net sales increased
$0.1
million, or
3.6%
, to
$2.9
million for the
first
quarter of fiscal
2012
, as compared to
$2.8
million for the
first
quarter of fiscal 2011. Translation of foreign operations net sales for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
increased reported net sales by $2.6 million or 2.3% due to average currency rates in the
first
quarter of fiscal
2012
, compared to the average currency rates in the
first
quarter of fiscal
2011
.
Cost of Products Sold
. Consolidated cost of products sold increased
$11.3
million, or
14.2%
, to
$90.8
million for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, compared to
$79.5
million for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
. Consolidated cost of products sold as a percentage of sales were
81.9%
for the
first
quarter of fiscal
2012
, compared to
80.3%
for the
first
quarter of fiscal
2011
. The Automotive segment experienced additional costs for design, development, engineering and launch costs of $1.2 million related to new programs that will not begin production until fiscal 2013 and costs of $0.6 million related to a vendor's production and delivery issues. In addition, the Automotive segment experienced higher utility costs in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. The Power segment experienced increased costs of $0.6 million for new product development, specifically for an on board charger for an electric truck.
Gross Margins.
Consolidated gross margins increased
$0.5
million, or
2.6%
, to
$20.0
million for the three months
20
Table of Contents
ended
July 30, 2011
, as compared to
$19.5
million for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
. Gross margins as a percentage of net sales were
18.1%
for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, compared to
19.7%
for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
. Gross margins as a percentage of sales decreased in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011, due to new program and product launch costs as well as higher utility costs and costs related to a vendor's production and delivery issues. In addition, gross margins were negatively impacted by increased sales of automotive product that has higher prime cost due to the current high percentage of purchased content, which was exacerbated by the vendor production and delivery issues. Gross margins were favorably impacted by the sales mix within the Interconnect segment.
Selling and Administrative Expenses
. Selling and administrative expenses increased by
$3.0
million, or
19.2%
, to
$18.6
million for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, compared to
$15.6
million for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
. The increase is primarily due to higher non-executive performance based compensation and severance of $1.4 million and stock award amortization of $0.8 million. Legal expenses related to the Delphi litigation decreased by $0.6 million to $0.8 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to $1.5 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. However, despite the decline in Delphi legal expenses, the total legal expense for the company was flat in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales increased to
16.8%
for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
from
15.8%
for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
.
Other Income, Net
. Other income, net decreased
$0.8
million to zero for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, as compared to
$0.8
million for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
. Other income included income of $0.1 million and $1.2 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010, respectively, related to life insurance policies in connection with an employee deferred compensation plan. All other amounts for both the
first
quarter of fiscal 2012 and the
first
quarter of fiscal 2011 relate to expenses for currency rate fluctuations. The functional currencies of these operations are the British pound, Chinese yuan, Euro, Indian Rupee, Mexican peso, Singapore dollar and Swiss Franc. Some foreign operations have transactions denominated in currencies other than their functional currencies, primarily sales in U.S. dollars and Euros, creating exchange rate sensitivities.
Income Tax Expense.
Income tax expense decreased by
$0.6
million to zero for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, compared to
$0.6
million for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
. During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, a benefit of $1.1 million was recorded relating to tax credits from our Malta facility, which was offset by $1.1 million of income tax expense related to foreign profits. The three months ended July 31, 2010 includes taxes on foreign profits of $0.5 million and $0.1 million related to Non-Federal U.S. taxes.
Net Income Attributable to Methode Electronics, Inc.
Net income attributable to Methode Electronics, Inc. decreased
$2.6
million to
$1.5
million for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, compared to
$4.1
million for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
. The decrease is primarily due to higher expenses for new product development and product launches, non-executive performance based compensation and severance, stock award amortization, costs related to a vendor's production and delivery issues, utilities and lower life insurance proceeds, partially offset by higher net sales and gross margins and lower tax expense in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
21
Table of Contents
Operating Segments
Automotive Segment Results
Below is a table summarizing results for the three months ended:
(in millions)
(“N/M” equals not meaningful)
July 30,
2011
July 31,
2010
Net Change
Net Change
Net sales
$
62.7
$
50.0
$
12.7
25.4
%
Cost of products sold
53.4
39.9
13.5
33.8
%
Gross margins
9.3
10.1
(0.8
)
(7.9
)%
Selling and administrative expenses
7.1
7.2
(0.1
)
(1.4
)%
Income from operations
$
2.2
$
2.9
$
(0.7
)
(24.1
)%
Percent of sales:
July 30,
2011
July 31,
2010
Net sales
100.0
%
100.0
%
Cost of products sold
85.2
%
79.8
%
Gross margins
14.8
%
20.2
%
Selling and administrative expenses
11.3
%
14.4
%
Income from operations
3.5
%
5.8
%
Net Sales
. Automotive segment net sales increased
$12.7
million, or
25.4%
, to
$62.7
million for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, from
$50.0
million for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
. Net sales increased in North America, Europe and Asia by 123.4%, 18.8% and 8.0%, respectively in the
first
quarter of fiscal
2012
, compared to the
first
quarter of fiscal
2011
. The increase in North America is due to increased sales for our Ford Center Console Program. The increase in Asia is due to increases in our transmission lead-frame and steering angle sensor products and the increase in Europe is primarily due to the euro strengthening against the U.S. dollar. Included in net sales is other income, which consisted primarily of earnings from engineering design fees and royalties. Other income increased $0.2 million, or 28.6%, to $0.9 million for the
three months ended
July 30, 2011
, from $0.7 million for the
three months ended
July 31, 2010
. Translation of foreign operations net sales for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
increased reported net sales by $2.6 million, or 4.3%, due to average currency rates in the
first
quarter of fiscal
2012
, compared to the average currency rates in the
first
quarter of fiscal
2011
.
Cost of Products Sold
. Automotive segment cost of products sold increased
$13.5
million, or
33.8%
, to
$53.4
million for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, from
$39.9
million for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
. The Automotive segment cost of products sold as a percentage of sales were
85.2%
in the
first
quarter of fiscal
2012
, compared to
79.8%
in the
first
quarter of fiscal
2011
. During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, our North American operations experienced additional costs for design, development, engineering and launch costs of $1.2 million related to new programs that will not begin production until fiscal 2013, as well as costs of $0.6 million related to a vendor's production and delivery issues. In Europe, we experienced higher costs related to new product launches as well as higher costs for utilities during the first quarter of fiscal 2012, as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The increase in costs of products sold as a percentage of sales was also affected by increased sales of product that has a higher prime cost due to the current high percentage of purchased content, which was exacerbated by the vendor production and delivery issues.
Gross Margins.
Automotive segment gross margins decreased
$0.8
million, or
7.9%
, to
$9.3
million for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, as compared to
$10.1
million for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
. The Automotive segment gross margins as a percentage of net sales were
14.8%
for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, as compared to
20.2%
for the
22
Table of Contents
three months ended
July 31, 2010
. Gross margins as a percentage of sales decreased in the
first
quarter of fiscal
2012
, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011, due to design, development, engineering and launch costs related to new programs and new product launches, as well as increased costs for utilities and costs related to a vendor's production and delivery issues. In addition, gross margins were negatively impacted in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 due to increased sales of product that has higher prime cost due to the current high percentage of purchased content.
Selling and Administrative Expenses
. Selling and administrative expenses decreased
$0.1
million, or
1.4%
, to
$7.1
million for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, compared to
$7.2
million for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
. Legal expenses related to the Delphi litigation decreased $0.6 million, to $0.8 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to $1.5 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The lower Delphi legal expenses were partially offset by non-executive performance based compensation for the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales were
11.3%
for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
and
14.4%
for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
.
Income from Operations.
Automotive segment income from operations decreased
$0.7
million, to
$2.2
million for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, compared to
$2.9
million for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
due to expenses related to new programs and new product launches, higher non-executive performance based compensation, costs related to a vendor's production and delivery issues and utility expenses, partially offset with increased net sales and lower Delphi legal expenses for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, compared to the three months ended
July 31, 2010
.
Interconnect Segment Results
Below is a table summarizing results for the three months ended:
(in millions)
(“N/M” equals not meaningful)
July 30,
2011
July 31,
2010
Net Change
Net Change
Net sales
$
32.4
$
34.6
$
(2.2
)
(6.4
)%
Cost of products sold
23.2
25.4
(2.2
)
(8.7
)%
Gross margins
9.2
9.2
—
—
%
Selling and administrative expenses
4.9
5.4
(0.5
)
(9.3
)%
Income from operations
4.3
3.8
0.5
13.2
%
Percent of sales:
July 30,
2011
July 31,
2010
Net sales
100.0
%
100.0
%
Cost of products sold
71.6
%
73.4
%
Gross margins
28.4
%
26.6
%
Selling and administrative expenses
15.1
%
15.6
%
Income from operations
13.3
%
11.0
%
Net Sales
. Interconnect segment net sales decreased
$2.2
million, or
6.4%
, to
$32.4
million for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, from
$34.6
million for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
. Net sales decreased 14.7% in North America primarily due to weak sales for white goods products, partially offset by stronger sales for data and remote control devices in the
first
quarter of fiscal
2012
, compared to the
first
quarter of fiscal
2011
. Net sales in Europe increased 5.3% primarily due to higher sales for data and remote control devices, partially offset by no optical sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, due to the sale of the optical business in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011. Net sales in Asia increased 23.6% primarily due to higher sales of remote control devices.
23
Table of Contents
Cost of Products Sold
. Interconnect segment cost of products sold decreased
$2.2
million, or
8.7%
, to
$23.2
million for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, compared to
$25.4
million for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
. Interconnect segment cost of products sold as a percentage of net sales decreased to
71.6%
for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, compared to
73.4%
for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
. Even though sales volumes decreased in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011, cost of goods sold as a percentage of sales decreased due to the sales mix within the segment.
Gross Margins.
Interconnect segment gross margins were
$9.2
million for both the three months ended
July 30, 2011
and for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
. Gross margins as a percentage of net sales increased to
28.4%
for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, from
26.6%
for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
. The increase in gross margins as a percentage of net sales primarily relates to a favorable sales mix within the segment in the
first
quarter of fiscal
2012
, compared to the
first
quarter of fiscal
2011
.
Selling and Administrative Expenses
. Selling and administrative expenses decreased
$0.5
million, or
9.3%
, to
$4.9
million for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, compared to
$5.4
million for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
. Selling and administrative expenses decreased due to no selling and administrative expenses for our optical business, partially offset by higher bad debt expense in the
first
quarter of fiscal
2012
, compared to the
first
quarter of fiscal
2011
. Selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased to
15.1%
for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, from
15.6%
for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
.
Income from Operations.
Interconnect segment income from operations increased
$0.5
million, or
13.2%
, to
$4.3
million for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, compared to
$3.8
million for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
due to favorable sales mix within the segment and lower selling and administrative expenses related to the optical business, partially offset by lower sales volumes and higher bad debt expenses in the
first
quarter of fiscal
2012
, compared to the
first
quarter of fiscal
2011
.
Power Products Segment Results
Below is a table summarizing results for the three months ended:
(in millions)
July 30,
2011
July 31,
2010
Net Change
Net Change
Net sales
$
12.8
$
11.5
$
1.3
11.3
%
Cost of products sold
10.8
9.2
1.6
17.4
%
Gross margins
2.0
2.3
(0.3
)
(13.0
)%
Selling and administrative expenses
1.8
1.8
—
—
%
Income from operations
$
0.2
$
0.5
$
(0.3
)
(60.0
)%
Percent of sales:
July 30,
2011
July 31,
2010
Net sales
100.0
%
100.0
%
Cost of products sold
84.4
%
80.0
%
Gross margins
15.6
%
20.0
%
Selling and administrative expenses
14.1
%
15.7
%
Income from operations
1.6
%
4.3
%
Net Sales
. Power Products segment net sales increased
$1.3
million, or
11.3%
, to
$12.8
million for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, compared to
$11.5
million for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
. Net sales increased in the
first
quarter of fiscal
2012
, as compared to the
first
quarter of fiscal
2011
by 11.6% in North America and by 12.2% in Asia. The
24
Table of Contents
increase in North America was driven by higher demand for our busbar and heat sink products, partially offset by lower demand for our flexible cabling products. The increase in Asia was due to higher demand for our busbar products. Sales for busbar products in Europe were flat in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
Cost of Products Sold
. Power Products segment cost of products sold increased
$1.6
million, or
17.4%
, to
$10.8
million for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, compared to
$9.2
million for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
. The Power Products segment cost of products sold as a percentage of sales increased to
84.4%
for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, from
80.0%
for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
. The increase in cost of products sold as a percentage of sales is due to increased costs for the product development, including $0.6 million for an on board charger for an electric truck in North America, partially offset by favorable sales mix in our heat sink and busbar products in the
first
quarter of fiscal
2012
, compared to the
first
quarter of fiscal
2011
.
Gross Margins.
Power Products segment gross margins decreased
$0.3
million, or
13.0%
, to
$2.0
million for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, compared to
$2.3
million for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
. Gross margins as a percentage of net sales decreased to
15.6%
for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
from
20.0%
for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
. The decrease in gross margins as a percentage of sales is due to increased costs for product development in North America, partially offset by favorable sales mix for our heat sink and busbar products in the
first
quarter of fiscal
2012
, compared to the
first
quarter of fiscal
2011
.
Selling and Administrative Expenses
. Selling and administrative expenses were
$1.8
million for both the three months ended
July 30, 2011
and for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
. Selling and administrative expenses increased due to new product development in North America, which were offset by lower non-executive performance based compensation in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased to
14.1%
for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
from
15.7%
for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
.
Income From Operations.
Power Products income from operations decreased
$0.3
million, or
60.0%
, to
$0.2
million for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, compared to
$0.5
million for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
, due to increased expenses for new product development, partially offset by higher net sales and lower non-executive performance based compensation expense in the
first
quarter of fiscal
2012
, compared to the
first
quarter of fiscal
2011
.
Other Segment Results
Below is a table summarizing results for the three months ended:
(in millions)
July 30,
2011
July 31,
2010
Net Change
Net Change
Net sales
$
2.9
$
2.8
$
0.1
3.6
%
Cost of products sold
2.6
2.7
(0.1
)
(3.7
)%
Gross margins
0.3
0.1
0.2
200.0
%
Selling and administrative expenses
1.3
0.7
0.6
85.7
%
Loss from operations
$
(1.0
)
$
(0.6
)
$
(0.4
)
66.7
%
Percent of sales:
July 30,
2011
July 31,
2010
Net sales
100.0
%
100.0
%
Cost of products sold
89.7
%
96.4
%
Gross margins
10.3
%
3.6
%
Selling and administrative expenses
44.8
%
25.0
%
Loss from operations
(34.5
)%
(21.4
)%
25
Table of Contents
Net Sales
. The Other segment net sales increased
$0.1
million, or
3.6%
, to
$2.9
million for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, compared to
$2.8
million for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
. Net sales from our torque-sensing business increased 5.7% in the
first
quarter of fiscal
2012
, compared to the
first
quarter of fiscal
2011
. Net sales from our testing facilities were flat in the
first
quarter of fiscal
2012
, compared to the
first
quarter of fiscal
2011
.
Cost of Products Sold
. Other segment cost of products sold decreased
$0.1
million to
$2.6
million for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, compared to
$2.7
million for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
. Cost of products sold as a percentage of sales decreased to
89.7%
in the
first
quarter of fiscal
2012
, compared to
96.4%
in the
first
quarter of fiscal
2011
. The decrease in cost of goods sold as a percentage of sales is due to sales mix in our torque-sensing business.
Gross Margins.
The Other segment gross margins increased
$0.2
million, to
$0.3
million for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, compared to
$0.1
million for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
. The increase is due to the increased net sales and favorable sales mix in our torque-sensing business in the
first
quarter of fiscal
2012
, compared to the
first
quarter of fiscal
2011
.
Selling and Administrative Expenses
. Selling and administrative expenses increased
$0.6
million, or
85.7%
, to
$1.3
million for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, compared to
$0.7
million for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
. The increase is primarily due to expenses related to higher non-executive performance based compensation and severance in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased to
44.8%
for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, from
25.0%
for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
.
Loss From Operations
The Other segment loss from operations increased
$0.4
million, or
66.7%
, to
$1.0
million for the three months ended
July 30, 2011
, compared to
$0.6
million for the three months ended
July 31, 2010
. The loss increased due to expenses related to higher non-executive performance based compensation and severance, partially offset with higher sales and favorable sales mix in our torque-sensing business in the
first
quarter of fiscal
2012
, as compared to the
first
quarter of fiscal
2011
.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We believe our current world-wide cash balances together with expected future cash flows to be generated from operations will be sufficient to support current operations. However, due to the shifting of operations from the U.S. to foreign locations, a significant amount of cash and expected future cash flows are located outside of the U.S. No provision has been made, except for our Ireland business, for income taxes on undistributed net income of foreign operations, as we currently expect them to be indefinitely reinvested in our foreign operations. However, if we change our position and the cash is distributed back to the U.S., it may have an adverse affect on our U.S. federal and state taxes, by lowering our net operating loss positions or potentially creating a tax liability.
During fiscal 2011, we were awarded a next generation center stack program for multiple GM vehicle platforms as well as transmission lead-frame assemblies for GM transmissions. Both programs are expected to be manufactured in our plant in Monterrey, Mexico. We anticipate that these programs will require a significant amount of cash for the purchase of equipment, tooling and initial inventory as well as additional staffing for the development and launching of the programs. We expect to begin production and generate sales on these programs in fiscal 2013. Therefore, we anticipate our cash balances may decline due to the launching of these programs without a corresponding increase in sales.
On February 25, 2011, we entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and certain other financial institutions, which amends and restates our previous credit facility and extends the maturity to February 25, 2016. The new credit facility is in the aggregate principal amount of $75.0 million, with an option to increase the principal amount by an additional $25.0 million subject to customary conditions and approval of the lender(s)providing new commitment(s). The new credit facility provides for variable rates of interest based on the type of borrowing and the Company's debt to EBITDA financial ratio. The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement is guaranteed by certain of our U.S. subsidiaries. At July 30, 2011, we were in compliance with the covenants of the agreement. During the
first
quarter of fiscal 2012, we had borrowings of $27.0 million and interest payments of $0.1 million, under this credit facility. As of
July 30, 2011
, there were outstanding balances due against the credit facility of $27.0 million.
Cash Flow Operating Activities
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities increased $8.7 million to cash provided of $6.5 million for the
three
months ended
July 30, 2011
, compared to cash used of $2.2 million for the
three
months ended
July 31, 2010
. The increase in operating cash flow was primarily attributable to the changes in operating assets and liabilities in the first three
26
Table of Contents
months of fiscal 2012, as compared to the first three months of fiscal 2011. Our trade accounts receivable, inventory and accounts payable in aggregate used $0.2 million of cash flow during the first three months of fiscal 2012, compared to cash used of $10.5 million for the first three months of fiscal 2011. The decreased use of cash reflects decreased accounts receivable levels due to timing of sales, partially offset by increased inventory levels, associated with increased business activity.
Cash Flow Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities increased $1.9 million to $4.6 million for the
three
months ended
July 30, 2011
, compared to $2.7 million for the
three
months ended
July 31, 2010
. Purchases of property, plant and equipment was $4.6 million for the first three months of fiscal 2012, compared to $2.0 million for the first three months of fiscal 2011. We invested $0.8 million in a new business in the first three months of fiscal 2011.
Cash Flow Financing Activities
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities increased $27.2 million to cash provided of $24.6 million in the first three months of fiscal
2012
, compared to cash used of $2.6 million for the first three months of fiscal
2011
. During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, the company had net borrowings against the credit facility of $27.0 million, compared to no borrowings in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. We paid dividends of $2.6 million for both the first three months of fiscal
2012
and fiscal
2011
. In addition, the first three months of fiscal 2012 included $0.2 million of proceeds for the exercise of stock options.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, other than operating leases and purchase obligations entered into in the normal course of business.
Item 3. Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Certain of our foreign operations enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency, primarily the U.S. dollar and the Euro. A 10% change in foreign currency exchange rates from balance sheet date levels could impact our income before income taxes by $3.0 million as of
July 30, 2011
and $3.8 million as of
April 30, 2011
. We also have foreign currency exposure arising from the translation of our net equity investment in our foreign operations to U.S. dollars. We generally view our investments in foreign operations with functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar as long-term. The currencies to which we are exposed are the British pound, Chinese yuan, Euro, Indian Rupee, Mexican peso, and Singapore dollar. A 10% change in foreign currency exchange rates from balance sheet date levels could impact our net foreign investments by $18.0 million at
July 30, 2011
and $17.9 million at
April 30, 2011
.
Item 4. Controls And Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, we performed an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s applicable rules and forms. As a result of this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended
July 30, 2011
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
27
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit
Number
Description
31.1
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer
31.2
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer
32
Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
28
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC.
By:
/s/ Douglas A. Koman
Douglas A. Koman
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
Dated:
September 1, 2011
29
Table of Contents
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit
Number
Description
31.1
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer
31.2
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer
32
Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
30