Table of Contents
UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
OR
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For transition period from to
OLD SECOND BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
36-3143493
(State or other jurisdiction
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
of incorporation or organization)
37 South River Street, Aurora, Illinois 60507
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(630) 892-0202
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x
No o
Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). (check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer x Non-accelerated filer o (do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).
Yes o
No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date: As of November 5, 2008, the Registrant had outstanding 13,756,186 shares of common stock, $1.00 par value per share.
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report
PageNumber
PART I
Item 1.
Financial Statements
3
Item 2.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
22
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
36
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
38
PART II
Legal Proceedings
39
Item 1.A.
Risk Factors
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Item 5.
Other Information
Item 6.
Exhibits
Signatures
41
2
PART I - - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Old Second Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)September 30,2008
December 31,2007
Assets
Cash and due from banks
$
52,512
60,804
Interest bearing deposits with financial institutions
417
403
Federal funds sold
2,192
2,370
Short-term securities available for sale
1,170
1,162
Cash and cash equivalents
56,291
64,739
Securities available for sale
426,039
559,697
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock
12,334
8,947
Loans held for sale
11,589
16,677
Loans
2,251,425
1,891,110
Less: allowance for loan losses
24,175
16,835
Net loans
2,227,250
1,874,275
Premises and equipment, net
63,216
49,698
Other real estate owned
925
Mortgage servicing rights, net
2,104
2,482
Goodwill
59,053
2,130
Core deposit and other intangible assets, net
8,120
Bank owned life insurance (BOLI)
48,823
47,936
Accrued interest and other assets
34,430
31,995
Total assets
2,950,174
2,658,576
Liabilities
Deposits:
Noninterest bearing demand
312,988
271,549
Interest bearing:
Savings, NOW, and money market
981,502
849,365
Time
1,034,702
992,704
Total deposits
2,329,192
2,113,618
Securities sold under repurchase agreements
38,765
53,222
Federal funds purchased
17,900
165,100
Other short-term borrowings
222,756
82,873
Junior subordinated debentures
58,378
57,399
Subordinated debt
45,000
Notes payable and other borrowings
22,538
18,610
Accrued interest and other liabilities
17,477
17,865
Total liabilities
2,752,006
2,508,687
Stockholders Equity
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; authorized 300,000 shares; none issued
Common stock, $1.00 par value; authorized 20,000,000 shares; issued 18,301,665 at September 30, 2008 and 16,694,775 at December 31, 2007; outstanding 13,756,186 at September 30, 2008 and 12,149,296 at December 31, 2007
18,302
16,695
Additional paid-in capital
58,504
16,114
Retained earnings
220,447
209,867
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
(4,327
)
1,971
Treasury stock, at cost, 4,545,479 shares at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007
(94,758
Total stockholders equity
198,168
149,889
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)Three Months EndedSeptember 30,
(Unaudited)Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
2008
2007
Interest and dividend income
Loans, including fees
33,961
33,784
102,523
97,964
89
161
497
508
Securities:
Taxable
3,591
4,605
12,551
12,528
Tax-exempt
1,484
1,494
4,481
4,243
40
138
124
275
Interest bearing deposits
30
4
28
Total interest and dividend income
39,195
40,186
120,217
115,546
Interest expense
Savings, NOW, and money market deposits
3,563
6,603
11,877
18,135
Time deposits
8,987
12,377
32,742
36,321
182
612
720
1,830
196
893
1,359
2,133
848
1,058
2,249
2,968
1,072
1,053
3,209
2,577
495
1,287
219
282
673
745
Total interest expense
15,562
22,878
54,116
64,709
Net interest and dividend income
23,633
17,308
66,101
50,837
Provision for loan losses
6,300
600
9,100
1,188
Net interest and dividend income after provision for loan losses
17,333
16,708
57,001
49,649
Noninterest income
Trust income
1,952
1,863
6,324
6,272
Service charges on deposits
2,543
2,190
6,911
6,406
Secondary mortgage fees
157
133
672
452
Mortgage servicing income
137
156
432
472
Net gain on sales of mortgage loans
938
1,011
4,651
3,328
Securities (losses) gains, net
(20
11
1,363
493
Increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance
65
546
685
1,599
Debit card interchange income
623
524
1,792
1,506
Other income
1,405
1,166
3,933
3,182
Total noninterest income
7,800
7,600
26,763
23,710
Noninterest expense
Salaries and employee benefits
10,630
8,898
33,825
28,589
Occupancy expense, net
1,478
1,442
4,475
3,923
Furniture and equipment expense
1,713
1,647
5,084
4,723
Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets
301
797
Advertising expense
592
399
1,600
1,239
Other expense
4,949
3,731
14,134
11,060
Total noninterest expense
19,663
16,117
59,915
49,534
Income before income taxes
5,470
8,191
23,849
23,825
Provision for income taxes
1,349
2,114
6,842
6,274
Net income
4,121
6,077
17,007
17,551
Share and per share information:
Ending number of shares
13,756,186
12,145,296
Average number of shares
13,747,723
12,145,479
13,520,949
12,630,512
Diluted average number of shares
13,832,875
12,295,282
13,636,166
12,776,660
Basic earnings per share
0.30
0.50
1.26
1.39
Diluted earnings per share
0.49
1.25
1.37
Dividends paid per share
0.16
0.15
0.47
0.44
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation
3,419
3,602
Amortization of leasehold improvement
150
303
Amortization and recovery of mortgage servicing rights, net
477
379
Origination of loans held for sale
(244,411
(169,091
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale
254,051
177,489
Gain on sales of mortgage loans
(4,651
(3,328
Change in current income taxes payable
(2,373
(685
(1,599
Change in accrued interest receivable and other assets
5,720
(967
Change in accrued interest payable and other liabilities
(6,153
(908
Net premium amortization on securities
504
635
Securities (gains), net
(1,363
(493
Stock-based compensation
760
503
Loss on sale of other real estate owned
13
15
Net cash provided by operating activities
32,362
25,475
Cash flows from investing activities
Proceeds from maturities and pre-refunds including pay down of securities available for sale
188,000
122,438
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale
61,819
560
Purchases of securities available for sale
(81,781
(164,885
Purchases of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
(1,917
(164
Net change in loans
(80,056
(125,636
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiary
(774
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned
595
33
Purchase of bank owned life insurance
(202
(54
Cash paid for acquisition, net of cash and cash equivalents retained
(38,852
Net purchases of premises and equipment
(5,520
(4,552
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
42,086
(173,034
Cash flows from financing activities
Net change in deposits
(78,782
133,534
Net change in securities sold under repurchase agreements
(14,457
15,752
Net change in federal funds purchased
(164,300
3,000
Net change in other short-term borrowings
135,802
9,275
Proceeds from the issuance of subordinated debt
Proceeds from junior subordinated debentures
979
25,774
Proceeds from notes payable and other borrowings
4,503
23,160
Repayment of note payable
(5,825
(21,175
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
421
Tax benefit from stock options exercised
64
185
Tax benefit from dividend equivalent payment
12
Dividends paid
(6,053
(5,479
Purchase of treasury stock
(31,239
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(82,896
153,208
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
(8,448
5,649
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
88,525
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
94,174
5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Continued
(Unaudited)Nine Months EndedSeptembrt 30,
Supplemental cash flow information
Income taxes paid
11,467
6,091
Interest paid for deposits
45,991
54,112
Interest paid for borrowings
9,464
10,247
Non-cash transfer of loans to other real estate
1,533
Change in dividends declared not paid
374
Acquisition of HeritageBanc, Inc.
Noncash assets acquired:
43,971
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank Stock
1,470
Loans, net
283,552
Premises and equipment
11,567
56,923
Core deposit and other intangible asset
8,917
Other assets
1,482
Total noncash assets acquired
407,882
Liabilities assumed:
Deposits
294,356
17,100
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
9,331
Other liabilities
5,243
Total liabilities assumed
326,030
Net noncash assets acquired
81,852
Cash and cash equivalents acquired
5,718
Stock issuance in lieu of cash paid in acquisition
43,000
6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Table amounts in thousands, except per share data, unaudited)
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accounting policies followed in the preparation of the interim financial statements are consistent with those used in the preparation of the annual financial information. The interim financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments, which are necessary, in the opinion of management, for a fair statement of results for the interim period presented. Results for the period ended September 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2008. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes included in Old Second Bancorp, Inc.s (the Company) annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. Unless otherwise indicated, amounts in the tables contained in the notes are in thousands. Certain items in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
The Companys consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and follow general practices within the banking industry. Application of these principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions, and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates, assumptions, and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements. Future changes in information may affect these estimates, assumptions, and judgments, which, in turn, may affect amounts reported in the financial statements.
All significant accounting policies are presented in Note A to the consolidated financial statements included in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. These policies, along with the disclosures presented in the other financial statement notes and in this discussion, provide information on how significant assets and liabilities are valued in the financial statements and how those values are determined.
In June 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a consensus regarding EITF Issue No. 06-11 - Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share - Based Payment Awards(EITF 06-11). EITF 06-11 states that a realized income tax benefit from dividends or dividend equivalents that are charged to retained earnings and are paid to employees for equity classified non-vested equity shares, non-vested equity share units, and outstanding equity share options should be recognized as an increase in additional paid-in capital. The amount recognized in additional paid-in capital for the realized income tax benefit from dividends on those awards should be included in the pool of excess tax benefits available to absorb potential future tax deficiencies on share-based payment awards. EITF 06-11 is effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2008. Adoption of EITF 06-11 did not have a material impact on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
On November 5, 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 109,Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair Value through Earnings (SAB 109). Previously, SAB 105, Application ofAccounting Principles to Loan Commitments, stated that in measuring the fair value of a derivative loan commitment, a company should not incorporate the expected net future cash flows related to the associated servicing of the loan. SAB 109 supersedes SAB 105 and indicates that the expected net future cash flows related to the associated servicing of the loan should be included in measuring fair value for all written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. SAB 105 also indicated that internally-developed intangible assets should not be recorded as part of the fair value of a derivative loan commitment, and SAB 109 retains that view. SAB 109 is effective for derivative loan commitments issued or modified in fiscal quarters beginning after December 15, 2007. The Company adopted the provisions of SAB 109 on January 1, 2008. The impact of adoption on January 1, 2008 was not material.
7
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141R) to change how an entity accounts for the acquisition of a business. When effective, this statement will replace existing SFAS No. 141 in its entirety. This Statement carries forward the existing requirements to account for all business combinations using the acquisition method (formerly called the purchase method). In general, this Statement will require acquisition-date fair value measurement of identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and noncontrolling interests in the acquiree. This Statement will eliminate the current costbased purchase method under SFAS No. 141. The new measurement requirements will result in the recognition of the full amount of acquisition-date goodwill, which includes amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests. The acquirer will recognize in income any gain or loss on the remeasurement to acquisition-date fair value of consideration transferred or of previously acquired equity interests in the acquiree. Neither the direct costs incurred to effect a business combination nor the costs the acquirer expects to incur under a plan to restructure an acquired business will be included as part of the business combination accounting. As a result, those costs will be charged to expense when incurred, except for debt or equity issuance costs, which will be accounted for in accordance with other generally accepted accounting principles. This Statement will also change the accounting for contingent consideration, in process research and development, contingencies, and restructuring costs. In addition, changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and acquired income tax uncertainties in a business combination that occur after the measurement period will impact income taxes under this Statement.
This Statement is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company intends to adopt this Statement effective January 1, 2009 and apply its provisions prospectively. The Company currently does not believe that the adoption of this Statement will have a significant effect on its financial statements; however, the effect is dependent upon whether the Company makes any future acquisitions and the specifics of those acquisitions. This Statement amends the goodwill impairment test requirements in SFAS No. 142. For a goodwill impairment test as of a date after the effective date of this Statement, the value of the reporting unit and the amount of implied goodwill, calculated in the second step of the test, will be determined in accordance with the measurement and recognition guidance on accounting for business combinations under this Statement. This change could effect the determination of what amount, if any, should be recognized as an impairment loss for goodwill recorded before the effective date of this Statement. This accounting will be required when this Statement becomes effective (January 1, 2009 for the Company) and applies to goodwill related to acquisitions accounted for originally under SFAS 141 as well as those accounted for under this Statement. The Company had $2.1 million of goodwill at December 31, 2007 related to previous business combinations. With the acquisition of Heritage on February 8, 2008, goodwill increased $56.9 million to $59.0 million. The Company has not determined what effect, if any, this Statement will have on the results of its impairment testing subsequent to December 31, 2008.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements: an amendment of ARB No. 51. The new Statement changes the accounting for, and the financial statement presentation of, noncontrolling equity interests in a consolidated subsidiary. This Statement replaces the existing minority-interest provisions of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, by defining a new termnoncontrolling intereststo replace what were previously called minority interests. The new standard establishes noncontrolling interests as a component of the equity of a consolidated entity. The underlying principle of the new standard is that both the controlling interest and the noncontrolling interests are part of the equity of a single economic entity: the consolidated reporting entity. Classifying noncontrolling interests as a component of consolidated equity is a change from the current practice of treating minority interests as a mezzanine item between liabilities and equity or as a liability. The change affects both the accounting and financial reporting for noncontrolling interests in a consolidated subsidiary. This Statement includes reporting requirements intended to clearly identify and differentiate the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. The reporting requirements are required to be applied retrospectively. This Statement is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning on or after
8
December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company intends to adopt this Statement effective January 1, 2009 and apply its provisions prospectively. The Company will also present comparative financial statements that reflect the retrospective application of the disclosure and presentation provisions when it applies the requirements of this Statement. The Company is evaluating the impact that the adoption of this Statement will have on its financial statements.
In December 2007, the SEC staff issued SAB No. 110, Share-Based Payment (SAB 110), which amends SAB 107, Share-Based Payment, to permit public companies, under certain circumstances, to use the simplified method in SAB 107 for employee option grants after December 31, 2007. Use of the simplified method after December 2007 is permitted only for companies whose historical data about their employees exercise behavior does not provide a reasonable basis for estimating the expected term of the options. The Company currently uses the simplified method to estimate the expected term for employee option grants as adequate historical experience is not available to provide a reasonable estimate. SAB 110 is effective for employee options granted after December 31, 2007. The Company adopted SAB 110 effective January 1, 2008 and will continue to apply the simplified method until enough historical experience is readily available to provide a reasonable estimate of the expected term for employee option grants. Thus, the impact of adoption on January 1, 2008 was not material.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (FSP FAS 157-2). This FSP delays the effective date of Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157) for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually) to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is evaluating the impact, if any, that the implementation of FSP FAS 157-2 will have on its financial statements. Details related to the adoption of SFAS No. 157 fair value measurements and the impact on our financial statements are discussed in Note 15.
In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement No. 161, Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133(SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. Although the Company does not expect the provisions of SFAS No. 161 to have a material impact on our financial statements, the Company is assessing the potential disclosure effects.
In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities, to clarify that all outstanding unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents, whether paid or unpaid, are participating securities. An entity must include participating securities in its calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) pursuant to the two-class method, as described in FASB Statement 128, Earnings per Share. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company intends to adopt FSP EITF 03-6-1 effective January 1, 2009 and apply its provisions retrospectively to all prior-period EPS data presented in its financial statements. The Company has periodically issued share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends and is in the process of evaluating the impact that the adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1 will have on its financial statements.
On October 10, 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active. The FSP clarifies the application of FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, in a market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not active. The FSP is effective upon
9
issuance, including prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued. The provisions of FSP FAS 157-3 did not have an impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
Note 2 Business Combination
Old Second Acquisition, Inc., was formed as part of the November 5, 2007 Agreement and Plan of Merger between the Company, Old Second Acquisition, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and HeritageBanc, Inc. (Heritage), located in Chicago Heights. The parties consummated the merger on February 8, 2008, at which time, Old Second Acquisition, Inc. was merged with and into Heritage with Heritage as the surviving corporation as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Additionally, the parties merged Heritage Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Heritage, with and into Old Second National Bank, with Old Second National Bank as the surviving bank. After the completion of the merger transaction, Heritage was dissolved and is no longer an existing subsidiary. The purchase price was paid through a combination of cash and approximately 1.6 million shares of the Companys common stock totaling $86.0 million excluding transaction costs. The transaction generated approximately $56.9 million in goodwill and $8.9 million in intangible assets subject to amortization.
The business combination was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the results of operations of Heritage have been included in the Companys results of operations since the date of acquisition. Under this method of accounting, the purchase price is allocated to the respective assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values, net of applicable income tax effects. The excess cost over fair value of net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.
Purchase Price of Heritage (in thousands):
Market value (market value per share of $27.50) of the Companys common stock issued
Cash paid
Transaction costs
1,570
Total purchase price
87,570
Allocation of the purchase price
Historical net assets of Heritage as of February 8, 2008
22,929
Fair market value adjustments as of February 8, 2008
Real estate
529
Equipment
(134
Artwork
(30
(122
Core deposit intangible and other intangible assets
(1,111
FHLB advances
(331
The purchase accounting for the transaction is preliminary and may be subject to subsequent adjustments. Under purchase accounting rules, goodwill may fluctuate based on receipt of finalized merger expense amounts as compared to prior estimates.
The following is the unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations of the Company as though Heritage had been acquired as of the beginning of the periods indicated.
10
Three Months EndedSeptember 30,
Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
Net interest income after provision
17,262
19,851
58,057
58,700
8,185
26,981
25,358
19,636
18,772
65,485
57,431
5,426
9,264
19,553
26,627
Income taxes
1,544
2,850
5,794
8,229
3,882
6,414
13,759
18,398
Per common share information
Earnings
0.28
1.00
1.30
Diluted earnings
0.46
0.99
1.29
Average common shares issued and outstanding
13,709,115
13,743,510
14,194,148
Average diluted common shares outstanding
13,832,869
13,858,918
13,858,729
14,288,979
Included in the pro forma results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was one-time pretax merger costs of $3.9 million.
Note 3 Securities
Securities available for sale are summarized as follows:
AmortizedCost
GrossUnrealizedGains
GrossUnrealizedLosses
FairValue
September 30, 2008:
U.S. Treasury
6,530
304
6,834
U.S. government agencies
129,716
320
(919
129,117
U.S. government agency mortgage-backed
67,836
366
(246
67,956
States and political subdivisions
154,391
1,578
(2,379
153,590
Collateralized mortgage obligations
57,970
198
(372
57,796
Asset-backed and equity securities
17,952
(6,043
11,916
434,395
2,773
(9,959
427,209
December 31, 2007:
10,018
132
10,150
209,799
955
(203
210,551
95,839
1,128
(92
96,875
158,862
1,440
(544
159,758
73,518
463
(40
73,941
9,559
25
9,584
557,595
4,143
(879
560,859
Recognition of other than temporary impairment was not necessary in the first nine months of 2008. The change in value was related primarily to interest rate fluctuations. An increase in rates will generally cause a decrease in the value of individual securities while a decrease in rates typically results in an increase in value. Accordingly, based on the Companys evaluation, management does not believe any individual unrealized loss at September 30, 2008 represents an other-than-temporary impairment as these unrealized losses are primarily attributable to changes in interest rates and the current volatile market conditions, and not credit deterioration.
The Company has the ability and intent to hold all securities until recovery.
Note 4 Loans
Major classifications of loans were as follows:
September 30,2008
Commercial and industrial
255,161
197,124
Real estate - commercial
792,114
633,909
Real estate - construction
476,847
399,087
Real estate - residential
694,556
634,266
Installment
28,922
20,428
Lease financing receivables
5,317
7,922
2,252,917
1,892,736
Net deferred loan fees and costs
(1,492
(1,626
Note 5 Allowance for Loan Losses
Changes in the allowance for loan losses as of September 30 are summarized as follows:
Balance at beginning of period
16,193
Addition resulting from acquisition
3,039
Loans charged-off
(5,079
(521
Recoveries
280
444
Balance at end of period
17,304
Note 6 Goodwill and Intangibles
The Company added $56.9 million in goodwill and recorded $8.9 million in core deposits and other intangibles due to the Heritage acquisition on February 8, 2008. Due to adjustments to asset valuation and expected acquisition related expenses, goodwill related to the purchase of Heritage decreased by $25,000 as of September 30, 2008. The amortization of intangible assets was $797,000 for the first nine months ended September 30, 2008. At September 30, 2008, the expected amortization of intangible assets is $1.1 million for the year ending December 31, 2008, $1.2 million for the year ending December 31, 2009 and $1.1 million for the year ending December 31, 2010, $847,000 for the year ending December 31, 2011 and $780,000 for the year ending December 31, 2012.
The following table presents the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill and other intangibles during the first nine months ended September 30, 2008 (in thousands):
Core Depositand OtherIntangibles
Balance, January 1
Amortization
(797
Balance, September 30
Note 7 Mortgage Servicing Rights
Changes in capitalized mortgage servicing rights as of September 30, summarized as follows:
2,569
3,032
Additions
99
221
(562
(529
2,106
2,724
Changes in the valuation allowance for servicing assets were as follows:
(87
(150
Provisions for impairment
(475
Recovery credited to expense
(2
Net balance
Note 8 Deposits
Major classifications of deposits as of September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, were as follows:
Noninterest bearing
Savings
108,121
96,425
NOW accounts
289,787
247,262
Money market accounts
583,594
505,678
Certificates of deposit of less than $100,000
622,369
599,034
Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more
412,333
393,670
Note 9 Borrowings
The following table is a summary of borrowings as of September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007:
219,035
80,000
Treasury tax and loan
3,721
2,873
405,337
377,204
The Company enters into sales of securities under agreements to repurchase (repurchase agreements). These repurchase agreements are treated as financings. The dollar amounts of securities underlying the agreements remain in the asset accounts. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase consisted of U.S. government agencies and mortgage-backed securities at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
The Companys borrowings and letters of credit at the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago (FHLBC) are limited to the lesser of 35% of total assets or a percentage of the book value of certain mortgage loans as well as a multiple of the amount of FHLBC capital stock owned. In addition, the advances and letters of credit outstanding, which totaled $31.9 million, were collateralized by FHLBC stock of $11.2 million and loans totaling $324.3 million at September 30, 2008. FHLBC stock of $7.8 million and loans totaling $278.6 million were pledged as of December 31, 2007. On September 12, 2008 a 2.20%, daily floating rate FHLBC advance of $175 million was obtained that had a rate of one basis point below the FHLBC federal funds equivalent rate, and on September 26, 2008 a 2.36% rate FHLBC advance of $40.0 million was obtained that had a floating rate of fifteen basis points above the same index. The $175.0 million advanced matured on October 14, 2008 and was renewed with a November 14, 2008 maturity at a spread of fifteen basis points above the FHLBC federal funds equivalent rate. Both of these advances can be prepaid without incurring a fee after providing a two-business day notice to the issuer. As of September 30, 2008, the Company also had $9.0 million in FHLBC advances that were assumed through the Heritage merger. These advances have fixed rates and $5.0 million of this amount is presented in the notes payable and other borrowings section of the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The amount and terms of these advances are $2.0 million maturing November 10, 2008 at a rate of 5.08%, $2.0 million maturing May 11, 2009 at a rate of 5.0%, and $5.0 million maturing February 16, 2010 at a rate of 5.09%.
The Company is a Treasury Tax & Loan (TT&L) depository for the Federal Reserve Bank and, as such, it accepts TT&L deposits. The Company is allowed to hold these deposits for the Federal Reserve until they are called. The interest rate is the federal funds rate less 25 basis points. Securities with a face value greater than or equal to the amount borrowed are pledged as a condition of borrowing TT&L deposits. As of September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, the TT&L deposits were $3.7 million and $2.9 million, respectively.
The Company had a $30 million revolving line of credit available with Marshall & Ilsley Bank (M&I) which had an outstanding balance of $18.6 million as of December 31, 2007. On January 31, 2008, the Company entered into a $75.5 million credit facility with LaSalle Bank National Association, (now Bank of America NA), which was comprised of a $30.5 million senior debt facility and $45.0 million of subordinated debt. The senior debt facility included a $500,000 term loan with a maturity of
14
March 31, 2018, and a revolving loan with a maturity of March 31, 2010. The revolving loan replaced the $30.0 million revolving line of credit facility previously held with M&I. At September 30, 2008, $16.9 million was outstanding on that line. Pending approval and negotiations with Bank of America NA, management expects to renew the revolving loan on an annual basis after it matures in 2010. The subordinated debt matures on March 31, 2018. The interest rate on the senior debt facility resets quarterly, and is based on, at the Companys option, either the Bank of America NA prime rate or three-month LIBOR plus 90 basis points. The interest rate on the subordinated debt resets quarterly, and is equal to three-month LIBOR plus 150 basis points. The senior debt is secured with all of the issued and outstanding shares of Old Second National Bank.
The above credit facility agreement contains usual and customary provisions regarding acceleration upon the occurrence of an event of default by the Company under the agreement, as described therein. The agreement also contains certain customary representations and warranties and financial and negative covenants. At September 30, 2008, the Company did not comply with one of the financial covenants contained within that credit agreement. The lender subsequently granted the Company a waiver with no additional consideration or change in terms. The proceeds of the $45.0 million of subordinated debt were primarily used to finance the acquisition of Heritage including transaction costs. The $30.5 million borrowing facility is for general corporate purposes and was primarily used in the past to repurchase common stock.
Note 10 Junior Subordinated Debentures
The Company completed the sale of $27.5 million of cumulative trust preferred securities by its unconsolidated subsidiary, Old Second Capital Trust I in June 2003. An additional $5.1 million of cumulative trust preferred securities was sold in the first week of July 2003. The costs associated with the tender offer of the cumulative trust preferred securities are being amortized over 30 years. The trust-preferred securities can remain outstanding for a 30-year term but, subject to regulatory approval, they can be called in whole or in part by the Company. The stated call period commenced on June 30, 2008 and can be exercised by the Company from time to time hereafter. Cash distributions on the securities are payable quarterly at an annual rate of 7.80%.
The Company issued an additional $25.0 million of cumulative trust preferred securities through a private placement completed by an additional unconsolidated subsidiary, Old Second Capital Trust II (the Trust) in April 2007. Although nominal in amount, the costs associated with that issuance are being amortized over 30 years. These trust preferred securities also mature in 30 years, but subject to the aforementioned regulatory approval, can be called in whole or in part on a quarterly basis commencing June 15, 2017. The quarterly cash distributions on the securities are fixed at 6.77% through June 15, 2017 and float at 150 basis points over the three-month LIBOR rate thereafter. The Company issued a new $25.8 million subordinated debenture to the Trust in return for the aggregate net proceeds of this trust preferred offering and to provide the primary source of financing for the common stock tender offer that was completed in May 2007. The interest rate and payment frequency on the debenture are equivalent to the cash distribution basis on the trust preferred securities.
Both of the debentures issued by Old Second Bancorp, Inc. are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as junior subordinated debentures and the related interest expense for each issuance is included in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Note 11 Long-Term Incentive Plan
The Long-Term Incentive Plan (the Incentive Plan) authorizes the issuance of up to 1,908,332 shares of the Companys common stock, including the granting of qualified stock options (Incentive Stock Options), nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, and stock appreciation rights. Total shares issuable under the plan were 664,277 at September 30, 2008 and 116,531 at December 31, 2007. Stock based awards may be granted to selected directors and officers or employees at the discretion of the board of directors. All stock options were granted for a term of ten years. Restricted stock vests three years
from the grant date. Awards under the Incentive Plan become fully vested upon a merger or change in control of the Company. Compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period of the options based on the fair value of the options at the grant date.
Total compensation cost that has been charged against income for those plans was $255,083 in the third quarter of 2008 and $760,115 in the first nine months of 2008. The total income tax benefit was $89,279 in the third quarter of 2008 and $266,040 in the first nine months of 2008. Total compensation cost that has been charged against income for those plans was $174,421 in the third quarter of 2007 and $503,411 in the first nine months of 2007. The total income tax benefit was $61,047 in the third quarter of 2007 and $176,194 in the first nine months of 2007.
There were 10,500 stock options exercised during the third quarter of 2008. There were no stock options granted during the third quarter of 2008. Total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options granted under the Incentive Plan is $617,951 as of September 30, 2008, and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.98 years. Total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options granted under the Incentive Plan is $401,803 as of September 30, 2007, and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.25 years.
A summary of stock option activity in the Incentive Plan as of each quarter is as follows:
Shares
WeightedAverageExercisePrice
WeightedAverageRemainingContractualTerm (years)
AggregateIntrinsicValue
Beginning outstanding
740,798
23.67
Granted
Exercised
(16,000
10.02
Expired
Ending outstanding
724,798
23.98
5.63
1,192,719
Exercisable at end of quarter
582,466
22.93
4.84
September 30, 2007:
682,411
22.60
(30,613
13.75
651,798
23.02
5.96
4,377,134
577,798
22.23
5.54
A summary of changes in the Companys nonvested options in the Incentive Plan is as follows:
16
September 30, 2008
WeightedAverageGrant DateFair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2008
142,332
6.53
Vested
Nonvested at September 30, 2008
A summary of stock option activity as of September 30 is as follows:
Intrinsic value of options exercised
97,258
160,818
465,905
Cash received from option exercises
106,064
160,259
420,858
Tax benefit realized from option exercises
38,655
63,917
185,174
Weighted average fair value of options granted
Restricted stock was granted beginning in 2005 under the Incentive Plan. No shares were issued during either the third quarter of 2008 or in the third quarter of 2007. These shares are subject to forfeiture until certain restrictions have lapsed, including employment for a specific period. These shares vest after a three-year period. Compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period of the shares based on the market value of the shares at issue date. Awards under the Incentive Plan become fully vested upon a merger or change in control of the Company.
A summary of changes in the Companys nonvested shares of restricted stock is as follows:
September 30, 2007
Nonvested at January 1
46,065
30.09
20,423
31.27
27,254
27.75
26,184
29.20
(702
31.34
Forfeited
(542
Nonvested at September 30
72,617
Total unrecognized compensation cost of restricted shares is $856,985 as of September 30, 2008, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.92 years. Total unrecognized compensation cost of restricted shares was $757,615 as of September 30, 2007, which was expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.94 years. There were 702 restricted shares vested at September 30, 2008 and none vested at September 30, 2007.
17
Note 12 Earnings Per Share
Earnings per share is included below as of September 30 (share data not in thousands):
Basic earnings per share:
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
Net income available to common stockholders
Diluted earnings per share:
Dilutive effect of restricted shares
36,103
18,238
31,217
14,138
Dilutive effect of stock options
49,049
131,565
84,000
132,010
Diluted average common shares outstanding
Number of antidilutive options excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation
550,000
280,000
475,000
Note 13 Other Comprehensive Income
The following table summarizes the related income tax effect for the components of Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) as of September 30:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available for sale securities arising during the period
(7,159
6,257
(9,087
3,906
Related tax benefit (expense)
2,846
(2,473
3,612
(1,547
Holding gains (losses) after tax
(4,313
3,784
(5,475
2,359
Less: Reclassification adjustment for the gains realized during the period
Realized gains (losses)
Income tax benefit (expense) on net realized gains
(4
(540
(196
Net realized gains (losses) after tax
(12
823
297
Total other comprehensive gain (loss)
(4,301
3,777
(6,298
2,062
Note 14 Retirement Plans
The Company maintains tax-qualified contributory and non-contributory profit sharing plans covering substantially all full-time and regular part-time employees. The expense of these plans was $1.8 million and $1.4 million in the first nine months of 2008 and 2007, respectively, as the Company had lowered its discretionary profit sharing contribution in 2007. Management increased the discretionary plan expense in 2008, in part to accommodate the additional permanent employees from Heritage.
18
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The statement establishes a fair value hierarchy about the assumptions used to measure fair value and clarifies assumptions about risk and the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157. This FSP delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually) to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. As disclosed in the Companys 2007 Annual Report the impact of adoption was not material.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The standard provides companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value and establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. The new standard was effective for the Company on January 1, 2008. As previously disclosed, the Company did not elect the fair value option for any financial assets or financial liabilities as of January 1, 2008.
Fair Value Measurement
Statement 157 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Statement 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the Company has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
Level 2: Significant observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, and other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a companys own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.
The Company uses the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate fair value:
· Investment securities available for sale are valued primarily by a third party pricing agent and both the market and income valuation approaches are implemented using the following types of inputs:
· U.S. treasuries are priced using the market approach and utilizing live data feeds from active market exchanges for identical securities.
· Government-sponsored agency debt securities are primarily priced using available market information through processes such as benchmark curves, market valuations of like securities, sector groupings and matrix pricing.
· Other government-sponsored agency securities, mortgage-backed securities and some of the actively traded REMICs and CMOs are primarily priced using available market information including benchmark yields, prepayment speeds, spreads and volatility of similar securities.
19
· Other inactive government-sponsored agency securities are primarily priced using consensus pricing and dealer quotes.
· State and political subdivisions are largely grouped by characteristics, i.e., geographical data and source of revenue in trade dissemination systems. Because some securities are not traded daily and due to other grouping limitations, active market quotes are often obtained using benchmarking for like securities.
· Asset-backed securities held by the Company are triple AAA rated collateralized debt obligations (CDO) collateralized by trust preferred security issuances of other financial institutions. These securities are not traded daily and are primarily priced using available market information through processes such as benchmark curves, market valuations of like securities, knowledge of credit events in underlying collateral, and standard fixed income techniques.
· Marketable equity securities are priced using available market information.
· Residential mortgage loans eligible for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. The fair value of loans held for sale is determined, when possible, using quoted secondary market prices. If no such quoted price exists, the fair value of a loan is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset or assets, adjusted for the specific attributes of that loan.
· Lending related commitments to fund certain residential mortgage loans (interest rate locks) to be sold in the secondary market and forward commitments for the future delivery of mortgage loans to third party investors are considered derivatives. Fair values are estimated based on observable changes in mortgage interest rates from the date of the commitment and do not typically involve significant judgments by management.
· The fair value of mortgage servicing rights is based on a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated net servicing income. The valuation model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income to derive the resultant value. The Company is able to compare the valuation model inputs, such as the discount rate, prepayment speeds, weighted average delinquency and foreclosure/bankruptcy rates to widely available published industry data for reasonableness.
· Interest rate swap positions, both assets and liabilities, are valued by means of Bloomberg pricing models using an income approach based upon readily observable market parameters such as interest rate yield curves.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis:
The table below presents the balance of assets and liabilities at September 30, 2008 measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Assets:
Investment securities available for sale
7,286
419,871
52
Other assets (Interest rate swap agreements)
624
Other assets (Forward loan commitments to investors)
(56
420,439
427,777
Liabilities:
Other liabilities (Interest rate swap agreements)
Other liabilities (Interest rate lock commitments to borrowers)
568
In the first nine months of 2008, there were no material changes or amounts in Level 3 assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
20
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis:
We may be required, from time to time, to measure certain other financial assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. These assets consist of servicing rights, impaired loans and loans held for sale (LHFS). Adjustments to fair value on LHFS primarily result from application of lower-of-cost-or-fair value accounting. For assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis on hand at September 30, 2008, the following table provides the level of valuation assumptions used to determine each valuation and the carrying value of the related assets:
Mortgage servicing rights(1)
Loans(2)
32,178
34,282
(1) Mortgage servicing rights, which are carried at the lower of cost or fair value, were written down to fair value of $2.1 million resulting in a valuation allowance of $1,700. A net recovery of $85,000 was included in earnings for the first nine months of the year.
(2) Represents carrying value and related write-downs of loans for which adjustments are based on the appraised value of collateral for collateral-dependent loans, had a carrying amount of $37.5 million, with a valuation allowance of $4.1 million, resulting in an additional provision for loan losses of $2.3 million for the first nine months of the year. The carrying value of loans fully charged off is zero.
The Company may occasionally enter into derivative financial instruments as part of our interest rate risk management strategies. These derivative instruments consist entirely of interest rate swaps and are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet with the fair value representing the net present value of expected future cash receipts or payments based on market interest rates on the balance sheet date. Since these derivative instruments are not accounted for as hedges, changes in fair value are recognized in noninterest income/expense. As of September 30, 2008, the notional amount of non-hedging interest rate swaps was $35.6 million whereas there were no interest rate swaps at December 31, 2007.
21
Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) is a financial services company with its main headquarters located in Aurora, Illinois. The Company is the holding company of Old Second National Bank (the Bank), a national banking organization headquartered in Aurora, Illinois and provides commercial and retail banking services, as well as trust services. The Company has offices located in Cook, Kane, Kendall, DeKalb, DuPage, LaSalle and Will counties in Illinois. On February 8, 2008, the Company completed its acquisition of HeritageBanc, Inc. (Heritage) and merged Heritage Bank with and into Old Second National Bank. As a result of the merger, the Company expanded its franchise into southwestern Cook County and the higher growth markets of the south Chicago suburbs by adding five retail banking locations and one mobile banking operation. This acquisition provided additional market penetration and allowed the Company to fill in its footprint surrounding the Chicago metropolitan area. The Company also offers insurance products through Old Second Financial, Inc.
Since the acquisition of Heritage, all major integration initiatives have been completed, and the Company began to realize economic benefits of the transaction in the second quarter of 2008. The acquired client base provided revenue opportunities for both the corporate and retail business units as the Companys retail and mortgage services, wealth management and employee benefit services offerings were more expansive than the previous product and services offered to Heritage clientele. Additionally, access to remote capture services and other treasury management products also became available to complement the traditional commercial deposit and loan products previously offered. The Company paid consideration of $43.0 million in cash and 1,563,636 shares of the Companys stock valued at $27.50 per share to consummate the Heritage acquisition. Details related to the allocation of the purchase price for this business combination are discussed in Note 2. The terms of the credit facilities that were established to complete the acquisition are detailed in Note 9.
Recent Developments
Recent events in the U.S. and global financial markets, including the deterioration of the worldwide credit markets, have created significant challenges for financial institutions such as the Company. Dramatic declines in the housing market during the past year, marked by falling home prices and increasing levels of mortgage foreclosures, have resulted in significant write-downs of asset values by many financial institutions, including government-sponsored entities and major commercial and investment banks. In addition, many lenders and institutional investors have reduced, and in some cases, ceased to provide funding to borrowers, including other financial institutions, as a result of concern about the stability of the financial markets and the strength of counterparties.
In response to the crises affecting the U.S. banking system and financial markets and attempt to bolster the distressed economy and improve consumer confidence in the financial system, on October 3, 2008, the U.S. Congress passed, and the President signed into law, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (the Stabilization Act). The Stabilization Act authorizes the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC) to implement various temporary emergency programs designed to strengthen the capital positions of financial institutions and stimulate the availability of credit within the U.S. financial system. Pursuant to the Stabilization Act, the U.S. Treasury will have the authority to, among other things, purchase up to $700 billion of mortgages, mortgage-backed securities and certain other financial instruments from financial institutions for the purpose of stabilizing and providing liquidity to the U.S. financial markets.
On October 14, 2008, the U.S. Treasury announced that it will purchase equity stakes in eligible financial institutions that wish to participate. This program, known as the Capital Purchase Program, allocates $250 billion from the $700 billion authorized by the Stabilization Act to the U.S. Treasury for the purchase of senior preferred shares from qualifying financial institutions. Eligible institutions will be
able to sell equity interests to the U.S. Treasury in amounts equal to between 1% and 3% of the institutions risk-weighted assets. In conjunction with the purchase of preferred stock, the U.S. Treasury will receive warrants to purchase common stock from the participating institutions with an aggregate market price equal to 15% of the preferred investment. Participating financial institutions will be required to adopt the U.S. Treasurys standards for executive compensation and corporate governance for the period during which the U.S. Treasury holds equity issued under the Capital Purchase Program. Many financial institutions have already announced that they will participate in the Capital Purchase Program. While the Companys management is confident that the Company has sufficient capital to support continued growth, the Company has applied to participate in the Capital Purchase Program.
Also on October 14, 2008, using the systemic risk exception to the FDIC Improvement Act of 1991, the U.S. Treasury authorized the FDIC to provide a 100% guarantee of newly-issued senior unsecured debt and deposits in non-interest bearing accounts at FDIC insured institutions. Initially, all eligible financial institutions will automatically be covered under this program, known as the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program, without incurring any fees for a period of 30 days. Coverage under the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program after the initial 30-day period is available to insured financial institutions at a cost of 75 basis points per annum for senior unsecured debt and 10 basis points per annum for non-interest bearing deposits. After the initial 30-day period, institutions will continue to be covered under the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program unless they inform the FDIC that they have decided to opt out of the program. The Company is assessing its participation in the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program and anticipates that it will participate in the insurance program covering the non-interest bearing deposits but not participate in the program to guarantee unsecured senior debt.
Under the Troubled Asset Auction Program, another initiative based on the authority granted by the Stabilization Act, the U.S. Treasury, through a newly-created Office of Financial Stability, will purchase certain troubled mortgage-related assets from financial institutions in a reverse-auction format. Troubled assets eligible for purchase by the Office of Financial Stability include residential and commercial mortgages originated on or before March 14, 2008, securities or obligations that are based on such mortgages, and any other financial instrument that the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury determines, after consultation with the Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, is necessary to promote financial market stability. The U.S. Treasury has not issued any definitive guidance regarding this program and the Companys management has not determined whether or not it will participate.
Under the Stabilization Act, the U.S. Treasury is also required to establish a program that will guarantee principal of, and interest on, troubled assets originated or issued prior to March 14, 2008, including mortgage-backed securities. The program may take any form and may vary by asset class, but it must be voluntary and self-funding. The U.S. Treasury has the authority to set premiums to reflect the credit risk characteristics of the insured assets. The U.S. Treasury has solicited requests for comments on how the program should be structured but no program has been implemented to date. The Stabilization Act also temporarily increases the amount of insurance coverage of deposit accounts held at FDIC-insured depository institutions, including Old Second National Bank, from $100,000 to $250,000. The increased coverage is effective during the period from October 3, 2008 until December 31, 2009.
It is not clear at this time what impact the Stabilization Act, the Capital Purchase Program, the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program, the Troubled Asset Auction Program, other liquidity and funding initiatives of the Federal Reserve and other agencies that have been previously announced, and any additional programs that may be initiated in the future will have on the Companys future financial condition and results of operations.
The preceding is a summary of recently enacted laws and regulations that could materially impact the Companys results of operations or financial condition. This discussion is qualified in its entirety by reference to such laws and regulations and should be read in conjunction with Supervision and Regulation discussion contained in ITEM 1: BUSINESS of the Companys 2007 Form 10-K.
23
Net income for the third quarter of 2008 decreased to $4.1 million, $0.30 diluted earnings per share, compared with $6.1 million, or $0.49 diluted earnings per share, in the third quarter of 2007. Earnings for the first nine months of 2008 also decreased to $1.25 per diluted share, on $17.0 million in net income, compared with $1.37 per diluted share in the first nine months of 2007, on earnings of $17.6 million. Earnings in the first nine months of 2008 were primarily affected by the Heritage acquisition, gains on sales of securities as well as an increased provision for loan losses. The Companys earnings in 2008 included the contribution of Heritage since its acquisition on February 8, 2008. Realized losses on securities totaled $20,000 in the third quarter of 2008, which brought the net realized gains total to $1.4 million for the year. In the third quarter of 2007, there was $11,000 in realized gains from sold securities, which brought the net realized gains total to $493,000 for that year. The Company recorded a $9.1 million provision for loan losses in the nine months ended September 30, 2008, which included an addition of $6.3 million in the third quarter. In the same period in 2007, the provision for loan losses was $1.2 million, $600,000 of which was added in the third quarter. The return on average equity decreased from 15.70% in the first nine months of 2007, to 11.65% for the same period in 2008.
The transaction charges related to Heritage, net of taxes calculated at a 35% statutory rate, totaled $16,000 in the third quarter of 2008 and $612,000, or $.04 per diluted share in the first nine months of 2008. Core net income, which is calculated by excluding these transaction costs, was $17.6 million in the first nine months of 2008, which equates to core diluted earnings per share of $1.29 and a core return on average equity of 12.07%. Management believes that the exclusion of the transaction charges more accurately reflects income from continuing operations, and references to core net income, core diluted earnings per share, and ratios identified as core are all non-GAAP measurements.
Net interest income increased from $50.8 million in the first nine months of 2007 to $66.1 million in the first nine months of 2008. Average earning assets grew $360.2 million, or 15.5%, from September 30, 2007 to September 30, 2008, primarily due to organic growth and the Heritage acquisition. The Company acquired $329.0 million in earning assets through the acquisition, which included $283.6 million in loans and $45.0 million in investments. Average interest bearing liabilities increased $317.1 million, or 15.4%, from September 30, 2007 and such increase was influenced by these same factors as the asset growth. Additionally, the Companys borrowings increased $43.0 million as a result of financing the cash portion of the consideration paid to Heritage shareholders for the acquisition. The net interest margin (tax equivalent basis), expressed as a percentage of average earning assets, increased from 3.06% in the first nine months of 2007 to 3.41% in the first nine months of 2008. The average tax-equivalent yield on earning assets decreased from 6.70% in the first nine months of 2007 to 6.02%, or 68 basis points, in the first nine months of 2008. At the same time, the cost of funds on interest bearing liabilities decreased from 4.18% to 3.03%, or 115 basis points.
Net interest income increased from $17.3 million in the third quarter of 2007 to $23.6 million in the third quarter of 2008. During the same period, the net interest margin (tax-equivalent basis), expressed as a percentage of average earning assets, increased from 3.01% in 2007 to 3.61% in 2008. The third quarter 2008 net interest income was enhanced by growth in average earning assets of $306.3 million, or 12.8%, which included the acquisition and organic growth factors discussed above. The average tax-equivalent yield on earning assets decreased from 6.74% in the third quarter of 2007 to 5.83% in the third quarter of 2008, or 91 basis points. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities also decreased from 4.23% to 2.57%, or 166 basis points, in the same period. The general decrease in interest rates lowered interest expense to a greater degree than it reduced interest income, and thereby improved the net interest margin.
Management, in order to evaluate and measure performance, uses certain non-GAAP performance measures and ratios. In addition to the core earnings discussion related to the Heritage acquisition transaction costs found in the results of operation section of the preceding page, management
24
has traditionally disclosed other certain non-GAAP ratios to evaluate and measure the Companys performance. This includes tax-equivalent net interest income (including its individual components) and net interest margin (including its individual components) to total average interest-earning assets. Management believes that these measures and ratios provide users of the financial information with a more accurate view of the performance of the interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and of the Companys operating efficiency for comparison purposes. Other financial holding companies may define or calculate these measures and ratios differently. See the tables and notes below for supplemental data and the corresponding reconciliations to GAAP financial measures for the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
The following tables set forth certain information relating to the Companys average consolidated balance sheets and reflect the yield on average earning assets and cost of average liabilities for the periods indicated. Dividing the related interest by the average balance of assets or liabilities derives rates. Average balances are derived from daily balances. For purposes of discussion, net interest income and net interest income to total earning assets on the following tables have been adjusted to a non-GAAP tax equivalent (TE) basis using a marginal rate of 35% to more appropriately compare returns on tax-exempt loans and securities to other earning assets.
ANALYSIS OF AVERAGE BALANCES,
TAX EQUIVALENT INTEREST AND RATES
Three Months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
(Dollar amounts in thousands - unaudited)
Average
Balance
Interest
Rate
2,277
5.16
%
643
2.43
8,217
1.90
11,114
4.86
309,470
4.64
378,666
Non-taxable (tax equivalent)
150,496
2,283
6.07
145,993
2,298
6.30
Total securities
459,966
5,874
5.11
524,659
6,903
5.26
Loans and loans held for sale (1)
2,228,863
34,110
5.99
1,856,568
33,989
7.16
Total interest earning assets
2,699,323
40,054
5.83
2,392,984
41,034
6.74
51,600
53,054
Allowance for loan losses
(22,114
(16,906
Other noninterest-bearing assets
208,456
128,468
2,937,265
2,557,600
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
322,074
0.94
255,402
1,207
1.87
577,267
2,658
1.83
520,238
5,168
3.94
Savings accounts
112,364
145
0.51
101,626
228
0.89
1,029,253
3.47
991,867
4.95
2,040,958
12,550
2.45
1,869,133
18,980
4.03
45,285
1.60
55,565
4.37
34,350
2.23
64,625
5.41
160,301
2.07
80,412
5.15
7.35
7.34
4.30
24,484
3.50
17,359
6.36
Total interest bearing liabilities
2,408,756
2.57
2,144,493
4.23
Noninterest bearing deposits
307,664
258,546
17,423
16,455
Stockholders equity
203,422
138,106
Net interest income (tax equivalent)
24,492
18,156
Net interest income (tax equivalent) to total earning assets
3.61
3.01
Interest bearing liabilities to earning assets
89.24
89.62
(1) Interest income from loans is shown on a tax equivalent basis as discussed below and includes fees of $994,000 and $1.2 million for the third quarter of 2008 and 2007, respectively. Nonaccrual loans are included in the above stated average balances.
26
Nine Months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
1,435
3.75
1,117
3.31
7,828
2.08
7,233
5.01
359,510
4.65
355,085
4.70
153,494
6,894
147,089
6,528
5.92
513,004
19,445
5.05
502,174
19,056
5.06
2,163,915
103,176
6.26
1,815,462
98,622
2,686,182
122,786
6.02
2,325,986
117,981
6.70
50,061
50,647
(20,578
(16,479
194,597
126,976
2,910,262
2,487,130
292,457
2,217
1.01
246,555
3,122
1.69
553,800
9,173
2.21
488,099
14,343
3.93
111,292
487
0.58
104,834
670
0.85
1,079,447
4.05
982,797
4.94
2,036,996
44,619
2.93
1,822,285
54,456
4.00
45,621
2.11
54,673
4.48
59,075
3.02
51,753
5.43
119,767
2.47
74,842
5.23
58,267
46,164
7.44
38,923
4.34
23,811
3.71
15,615
6.29
2,382,460
3.03
2,065,332
4.18
314,592
255,431
18,250
16,939
194,960
149,428
68,670
53,272
3.41
3.06
88.69
88.79
(1) Interest income from loans is shown on a tax equivalent basis as discussed below and includes fees of $3.1 million and $2.9 million for the first nine months of 2008 and 2007, respectively. Nonaccrual loans are included in the above stated average balances.
As indicated previously, net interest income and net interest income to earning assets have been adjusted to a non-GAAP tax equivalent (TE) basis using a marginal rate of 35% to more
27
appropriately compare returns on tax-exempt loans and securities to other earning assets. The table below provides a reconciliation of each non-GAAP TE measure to the GAAP equivalent for the periods indicated:
Effect of Tax Equivalent Adjustment
Interest income (GAAP)
Taxable equivalent adjustment - loans
60
44
Taxable equivalent adjustment - securities
799
804
2,413
2,285
Interest income (TE)
Less: interest expense (GAAP)
Net interest income (TE)
Net interest and income (GAAP)
Net interest income to total interest earning assets
3.48
2.87
3.29
2.92
Net interest income to total interest earning assets (TE)
In the first nine months of 2008, the Company recorded a $9.1 million provision for loan losses, which included an addition of $6.3 million in the third quarter. Additionally, management continues to believe that the $3.0 million allowance for loan losses assumed in the Heritage transaction in the first quarter was adequate to address the risks specific to the loan portfolio purchased. Approximately $2.4 million of the September 30, 2008 problem loan total was acquired through the Heritage Bank acquisition and these loans have a total specific allocation estimate of $711,000 at September 30, 2008. In the first nine months of 2007, the provision for loan losses was $1.2 million, $600,000 of which was added in the third quarter. Nonperforming loans increased to $65.7 million at September 30, 2008 from $6.0 million at December 31, 2007, and $5.6 million at September 30, 2007. Charge-offs, net of recoveries, totaled $4.8 million and $77,000 in the first nine months of 2008 and 2007, respectively. Net charge-offs totaled $3.7 million in the third quarter of 2008 and $45,000 in the third quarter of 2007. Provisions for loan losses are made to provide for probable and estimable losses inherent in the loan portfolio.
Nonperforming loans increased $59.7 million from $6.0 million at December 31, 2007 to $65.7 million at September 30, 2008. Nonperforming loans also increased on a linked quarter basis from $30.7 million at June 30, 2008. The nonperforming loans at September 30, 2008 were heavily concentrated in a handful of credit relationships. Four relationships made up 58.1% of the total, and ten relationships made up 75.6% of the total nonperforming loans. The following narrative provides detail relative to each of the largest four nonperforming relationships.
· The first nonperforming commercial and residential land developer relationship has a total exposure outstanding of $14.0 million. $5.7 million of this amount was past due more than ninety days and still accruing interest. $4.1 million of this relationship was current at September 30, still accruing interest, and was not included in the nonperforming loan total. A combination of occupied retail centers that are fully leased and retail zoned land collateralizes these two credits and management believes that the credits are supported by adequate lease income and/or interest reserves. However, a low six-figure mechanics lien was filed on the project, which management believes is a result of the developers difficulties on other projects. As such, the Company has decided to withhold a renewal of this credit pending the receipt of more details on the lien. Management believes the Company is well secured on this credit and has made no specific allocation since it expects to resolve the lien issues and be able to bring the loan current through either a renewal or extension. There is also a related $4.2 million loan that is on nonaccrual that is secured by a parcel of commercially zoned and annexed land in a desirable
location. The borrower has been negotiating sale contracts and shortly after quarter-end entered into a contract that, if fulfilled, will produce proceeds more than sufficient to satisfy the Companys exposure. Management estimates that a sale of this property could culminate in late 2008 or early 2009, but is proceeding with foreclosure efforts until management believes that the closing under this contract is reasonably certain. No specific allocation has been assigned by management to this credit.
· The second largest nonperforming loan relationship is to a residential builder and developer that has a total exposure of $13.7 million, with a specific allocation of $790,000. The credits are comprised of loans against residential-zoned farmland and a development in progress both of which are located in the Companys market area. The latter development comprises about 75% of the borrowers exposure and consists of a townhome component that is approximately 66.7% sold out. Management believes the project will be completely sold out within approximately 30 months. Additional lots within the same project are zoned for condominiums or apartments on which no vertical construction has started, and a retail-zoned portion of land is located near the entrance of the project. The project has been proceeding satisfactorily, but the borrower has other development projects with other lenders that are not performing as well, and management understands that the borrower is negotiating settlement arrangements with its various lenders in lieu of filing for bankruptcy. Management is negotiating a possible deed-in-lieu agreement, and management expects such negotiation will result in acquisition of title within a short time period. Recently obtained appraisals on the properties indicate liquidation basis values that would cover most of the credit exposure and substantively formed the basis for the specific allocation assigned. Further, ongoing sales of the townhomes and several submitted letters of intent from buyers on the condominium/apartment portions support the current valuations.
· The third largest nonperforming relationship is to a residential builder and developer with a total exposure of $7.5 million. This credit is on nonaccrual and has a specific allocation of $500,000. The relationship is comprised of debts that are secured by residential-zoned farmland, and a combination of completed residential lots and phased land slated for development in two other projects. One project started about three years ago and experienced good sales until late 2007. Recent sales have been slow and managements review of values obtained in recent appraisals indicated that the likely liquidation value required the specific allocation amount cited above. A second project opened in 2007 and sales activity has been stagnant. Management continues to pursue a variety of workout remedies with the borrower who has remained cooperative.
· The fourth largest nonperforming loan relationship is to a residential developer with a total exposure of $7.0 million. This loan is on nonaccrual and the amount outstanding is net of a $2.8 million charge-off that was taken in September 2008. Management determined that no additional specific allocation amount was required. This loan is secured by a parcel of residential-zoned farmland. The developer has ceased supporting the credit relationship and management continues to take action towards collection. The charged-off amount is comprised of funds that were advanced for development costs associated with zoning and engineering plus 15% of the land cost, which additional amount the bank typically would advance on the in-progress developments. Now that the project has stalled and the borrower has failed to perform on the loan obligation, management has estimated that the amount charged off reduces the exposure to approximately 65% of original land-only costs as supported by a current appraisal.
The next six largest nonperforming credits range in size from $1.7 million to $2.3 million, and are comprised of one credit on income-producing residential real estate, three credits on income-producing commercial real estate, and two credits to small builders and developers. All of the properties are located in the greater Chicago-land area. All of these credits are on non-accrual, and the total specific allocation is approximately $883,000, with $473,000 of that amount allocated to the builder/developer credits with the remainder allocated to a commercial real estate credit. These amounts have been determined based on
29
updated appraisals and/or management evaluations of the properties, and are believed to be adequate to cover the probable losses.
The bulk of the remaining nonperforming loans consist of various small commercial real estate, small commercial and industries credits, and residential mortgages in foreclosure. A total of $2.0 million of specific allocation has been recorded as the probable loss amount on these credits. Most of the allocations represent small percentages of the individual credit relationships.
A linked quarter comparison of loans that are classified as performing, but past due thirty to eighty-nine days and still accruing interest, shows that this category increased from $15.7 million at June 30 to $23.1 million at September 30, 2008. Of the September past due amount, $6.5 million, or 27.9% was to various past due commercial land development and construction credits and $9.2 million, or 39.8% were secured by nonfarm nonresidential properties. The volume of loans in the past due thirty to eight-nine days and still accruing category varies and was $26.7 million at June 30, 2007, $10.5 million at September 30, 2007, and $8.8 million at December 31, 2007, respectively.
The Companys market areas have tended to be demographically strong. These market areas have not experienced some of the more dramatic downturns in housing prices as reported in other areas of the country. While the Company has a higher than peer exposure to real estate construction loans at 21.2% of the total loan portfolio at September 30, 2008, the Company generally lends within its markets and its construction lending is typically based upon cost versus appraisal values. Additionally, the Company does not have any material direct exposure to sub prime loan products as it has focused its real estate lending activities on commercial real estate and construction and development loans within local markets, as well as on traditional loan products to residential borrowers.
The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans was 36.8% as of September 30, 2008 as compared to 282.0% at December 31, 2007 and 308.6% at September 30, 2007. While this ratio has decreased at September 30, 2008, management believes the allowance coverage is sufficient due to the estimated loss potential. Management determines the amount to provide in the allowance for loan losses based upon a number of factors, including loan growth, the quality and composition of the loan portfolio, and loan loss experience. While the amount of nonperforming loans decreased in the first part of 2007, management detected a general deceleration in real estate building and development activity as compared to prior years. While borrowers generally continued to perform on their commercial real estate obligations during this time, management believed that the slowdown in the development and construction sector combined with the Companys concentration in these types of loans represented increased risk. These environmental factors are also evaluated on an ongoing basis and are included in the assessment of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.
The allowance for loan losses represents managements estimate of probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses requires significant judgment and the use of estimates related to the amount and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience, and consideration of current economic trends and conditions, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. The loan portfolio also represents the largest asset on the consolidated balance sheet. When measured as a percentage of loans outstanding, the allowance for loan losses increased to 1.07% at September 30, 2008, as compared to 0.89% at December 31, 2007 and 0.92% as of September 30, 2007. In managements judgment, an adequate allowance for estimated losses has been established; however, there can be no assurance that actual losses will not exceed the estimated amounts in the future.
Nonperforming loans include loans in nonaccrual status, troubled debt restructurings, and loans past due ninety days or more and still accruing interest. Nonperforming loans and related disclosures for the period ended September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were as follows:
September 30,
December 31,
Nonaccrual loans
57,853
5,346
Restructured loans
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest
7,853
625
Nonperforming loans
65,706
5,971
Other real estate
Nonperforming assets
66,631
Interest income recorded on nonaccrual loans
1,520
179
Interest income which would have been accrued on nonaccrual loans
2,666
480
Noninterest income increased $200,000, or 2.6%, to $7.8 million during the third quarter of 2008 as compared to $7.6 million during the same period in 2007. Noninterest income was $26.8 million during the first nine months of 2008 and $23.7 million during the first nine months of 2007, an increase of $3.1 million, or 12.9%. Service charge income increased $353,000, or 16.1%, in the third quarter of 2008, and $505,000, or 7.9%, for the year to date period. For the third quarter comparison, the primary sources of the increases were from consumer bounce protection fees, commercial checking overdraft fees and the commercial checking service charge account categories. For the year to date period, commercial overdraft and account service charges had the largest increases. The latter item increased in large part from the reduced commercial earnings credits that resulted from a lower interest rate environment. Despite market turbulence, third quarter 2008 mortgage banking income, including net gain on sales of mortgage loans, secondary market fees, and servicing income, totaled $1.2 million, a decrease of $68,000, or 5.2%, from the third quarter of 2007. The Company reengineered its secondary mortgage lending operations and system tools in the second quarter 2007 including its approach to pricing, compensation and geographic distribution of lenders. In part because of this reorganization, year to date mortgage-banking income in 2008 increased $1.5 million, or 35.3%, from $4.3 million in the first nine months of 2007 to $5.8 million in the same period of 2008.
Realized losses on securities totaled $20,000 in the third quarter of 2008, which brought the net realized gains total to $1.4 million for the year. In the third quarter of 2007, there was $11,000 in realized gains from sold securities, which brought the net realized gains total to $493,000 for that year. Bank owned life insurance (BOLI) income continued to decrease in the third quarter of 2008 and was $481,000, or 88.1%, lower than the same period in 2007. This was due in large part to the continued decrease in interest rates available on the underlying insurance investments, although there was also a $169,000 impairment loss included in the net BOLI income in third quarter 2008. In the first nine months of 2008, BOLI income decreased $914,000, or 57.2%, from 2007 levels. Interchange income from debit card usage had a consistent rate of growth for both the quarter and the year. The revenue stream from this source increased $99,000, or 18.9%, in the third quarter of 2008 as customers continued to show a preference for this payment method. Other noninterest income increased $239,000, or 20.5%, in the third quarter of 2008 and was up $751,000, or 23.6% for the year. The largest sources of increase in the other income category for both periods were letter of credit and credit card processing fees, automatic teller machine surcharge and interchange fees, and fees collected from interest rate swap transactions.
Noninterest expense was $19.7 million during the third quarter of 2008, an increase of $3.5 million, or 22.0%, from $16.1 million in the third quarter of 2007. Noninterest expense was $59.9 million during the first nine months of 2008, an increase of $10.4 million, or 21.0%, from $49.5 million in the first nine months of 2007. Approximately $942,000 of the aggregate noninterest expense increase was
31
related to one-time merger costs. The tax-equivalent efficiency ratio was 62.78% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to 64.34% for the same period in 2007. This ratio improved to 60.89% for the third quarter of 2008, compared to 62.58% for the same period in 2007. This improvement was reflective of lower levels of noninterest expense relative to the combined increased volume of noninterest and net interest income. The efficiency ratio measures noninterest expense as a percentage of the sum of net tax-equivalent interest income plus noninterest income. Excluding the one-time merger costs, net of taxes calculated at a 35% statutory tax rate, the core efficiency ratio for the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2008 was 60.84% and 62.14% respectively. Management believes that the non-GAAP core efficiency ratio calculation provides insight into comparison between the periods by eliminating the impact of nonrecurring items related to the Heritage acquisition.
Salaries and benefits expense was $10.6 million during the third quarter of 2008, an increase of $1.7 million, or 19.5%, from $8.9 million in the third quarter of 2007. Salaries and benefits expense was $33.8 million during the first nine months of 2008, an increase of $5.2 million, or 18.3%, from $28.6 million in the first nine months of 2007. The increase in personnel expenses related primarily to normal annual increases in compensation rates and increased staffing levels that included the addition of 61 full time equivalent employees from Heritage. Also included in the 2008 expense amount was $553,000 of nonrecurring personnel costs related to former Heritage employees. The full time equivalent count rose from 527 in the third quarter of 2007 to 619 in the third quarter of 2008. The 2008 expense for the discretionary profit sharing and management bonus plans also increased as compared to 2007, as did the commission expense related to mortgage loan sales activity.
Occupancy expense increased slightly by $36,000, or 2.5%, from the third quarter of 2007 to the third quarter of 2008. Occupancy expense increased $552,000, or 14.1%, from the first nine months of 2007 to the first nine months of 2008. On a comparative basis, facility expense in 2008 incorporated one new retail branch that opened in May 2007, the relocation of a leasehold facility to a Company owned location in August 2008, as well as the addition of five Heritage retail locations and one mobile banking facility. An additional $55,000 was due to a one-time settlement charge to close a leased mortgage origination office that was vacated in the first quarter of 2008. The largest category increases in occupancy expense for both the quarter and year to date periods, however, were for real estate taxes and maintenance expenses. On a quarterly comparative basis, furniture and equipment expense increased $66,000, or 4.0%, in the third quarter 2008. In the first nine months of 2008, furniture and equipment expense increased $361,000, or 7.6%, from the first nine months of 2007. $294,000 of this increase was attributable to one-time conversion costs, with the remainder attributable to systems enhancements, including expanded off site systems recovery infrastructure. Third quarter 2008 advertising expense increased by $193,000, or 48.4%, when compared to the same period in 2007, primarily due to an increased volume of marketing initiatives as well as increased sponsorship of local community events. Advertising expense increased in the same categories in the first nine months of 2008 by a total of $361,000, or 29.1%, as compared to the first nine months of 2007. Other expense increased $1.2 million in the third quarter and $3.1 million in the first nine months of 2008. The increase for the year to date period was primarily due to the resumption of FDIC insurance premiums as prior credits expired, telephone, collection related expenses, debit card processing costs, and correspondent bank fees, which increased as earnings credits declined with the general decline in market interest rates. The Company expects that FDIC expenses may increase in the future due to its participation in the temporary liquidity guarantee program discussed previously.
With the lower level of third quarter 2008 earnings, the portion that was taxable was reduced in comparison to the same period in 2007. Accordingly, the provision for income tax as a percentage of pretax income, or effective tax rate, decreased from 25.8% in the third quarter of 2007 to 24.7% in the third quarter of 2008. The provision for income tax as a percentage of pretax income increased from 26.3% in the first nine months of 2007 to 28.7% in the first nine months of 2008. Increased levels of tax-exempt income from securities helped to reduce federal income tax expense in the first nine months of 2008, but this benefit was more than offset by a reduction in BOLI income. The effective tax rate also
32
increased in 2008 due to a change in Illinois tax law. Under the revised tax law, Old Second Management, LLC (OSM), an investment subsidiary of the bank, no longer qualifies as an excluded company and its receipts now require inclusion in the unitary tax return. The Illinois tax law revision also changed the deductibility of real estate investment trust (REIT) dividends beginning January 1, 2009, which will eliminate the recognition of a substantial portion of the tax benefits related to this ownership structure. OSM owns 100% of the common stock of a REIT, which holds fixed and variable rate real estate loans that were previously held by our bank subsidiary. In addition to providing income tax benefits, which lower the effective tax rate, the REIT ownership structure also provides the Company with a vehicle for raising future capital as desired. The general decrease in market and loan portfolio interest rates lowered the amount of interest income generated by the REIT in 2008, as did a decrease in the loan balances held by that subsidiary.
Total assets as of September 30, 2008 increased $291.6 million, to $2.95 billion, from $2.66 billion as of December 31, 2007. Loans grew $360.3 million during the same period, with Heritage contributing $283.6 million of that increase at the acquisition date. Securities available for sale decreased $133.7 million during the first nine months of 2008 and served to provide funding for loan growth. Preliminary estimates of goodwill and core deposit and other intangible assets related to the Heritage acquisition were $56.9 million and $8.9 million, respectively and additional information related to the carrying amount of goodwill and core deposit and other intangible assets are discussed in Note 6 of the financial statements included in this quarterly report.
Goodwill and other intangible assets are reviewed for potential impairment on an annual basis, or more often if events or circumstances indicate that there may be impairment, in accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level and an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. The Company employs general industry practices in evaluating the fair value of its goodwill and other intangible assets. The Company calculates the fair value using a combination of the following valuation methods: dividend discount analysis under the income approach, which calculates the present value of all excess cash flows plus the present value of a terminal value and price/earnings multiple under the market approach. Management performed its annual review of goodwill at September 30, 2008 and determined there was no impairment of goodwill. No assurance can be given that future impairment tests will not result in a charge to earnings. Although not expected to change substantively, goodwill is considered preliminary until the acquisition related expenses are finalized, which management expects to occur in the fourth quarter of 2008.
Total loans were $2.25 billion as of September 30, 2008, an increase of $360.3 million from $1.89 billion as of December 31, 2007. As noted above, the increase was due in large part to the Heritage acquisition although organic loan growth continued to be strong through the third quarter of 2008. Heritage had a similar loan portfolio distribution as the Company and the largest changes by loan type included increases in commercial real estate and real estate construction loans of $158.2 million and $77.8 million, respectively. Commercial and industrial loans grew $58.0 million whereas residential real estate loans increased $60.3 million in the same nine-month comparison.
The loan portfolio generally reflects the profile of the communities in which the Company operates, and the local economy has held up well as compared to other parts of the country experiencing more dramatic price adjustments. Because the Company is located in growing areas with significant open space, real estate lending (including commercial, residential, and construction) has been and continues to be a sizeable portion of the portfolio. As noted previously, a substantial portion of the loan growth in
2008 was acquired and the Heritage loan portfolio mix also had a substantial real estate component. In the aggregate, real estate loans represented 87.2% of the portfolio as of September 30, 2008 and 88.2% of the portfolio as of December 31, 2007.
Securities available for sale totaled $427.2 million as of September 30, 2008, a decrease of $133.7 million, or 23.83%, from $560.9 million as of December 31, 2007. The largest category decreases were in United States government agency and United States government agency mortgage-backed securities, which decreased $81.4 million, or 38.7%, and $28.9 million, or 29.9% respectively in the first nine months of 2008. This was largely due to the increased volume of called securities and mortgage pass-through payments received in a declining rate environment. The cash flows from the security calls, prepayments, maturities and sales were generally used to fund loan growth. The portfolio shifted to a net unrealized loss, net of deferred tax of $4.3 million at September 30, 2008, from a $2.0 million net unrealized gain position as of December 31, 2007.
Total deposits increased $215.6 million during the first nine months of 2008, to $2.33 billion as of September 30, 2008, due in large part to the Heritage acquisition. The deposit categories that grew the most in the first nine months of 2008 were money market and NOW deposit accounts, which increased $77.9 million and $42.5 million respectively. Certificates of deposits also increased $42.0 million, in part from the certificates of deposits acquired in the Heritage transaction, as well as customers moving to lock in interest rates in a declining interest rate environment. Lower cost sources of funds categories included a demand deposit increase of $41.4 million and a savings account increase of $11.7 million. The average cost of interest bearing funds decreased from 4.23% in the third quarter of 2007 to 2.57%, or 166 basis points, in the third quarter of 2008. In comparing the first nine months of 2007 to the same period in 2008, the average cost of interest bearing funds decreased 115 basis points.
The most significant borrowing in 2008 occurred on January 31, 2008, when the Company entered into a $75.5 million credit facility with LaSalle Bank National Association (now Bank of America). Part of this new credit facility replaced a $30.0 million revolving line of credit facility previously held between the Company and Marshall & Ilsley Bank. The new $75.5 million credit facility was comprised of a $30.5 million senior debt facility and $45.0 million of subordinated debt. The proceeds of the $45.0 million of subordinated debt were used to finance the acquisition of Heritage, including transaction costs. The Company paid consideration of $43.0 million in cash and 1,563,636 shares of Company stock valued at $27.50 per share, for a total transaction value of $86.0 million, to consummate the acquisition of 100% of the outstanding stock of Heritage. Other major borrowing category changes from December 31, 2007 included a decrease of $147.2 million, or 89.2%, in overnight federal funds purchased and a $139.0 million increase in short term Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago (FHLBC) advances, which is included in other short-term borrowings. The latter source of funds is also primarily floating rate, and $175.0 million of this amount was indexed at a one basis point spread below the daily effective FHLBC federal funds rate, and $40.0 million was priced at a fifteen basis point spread over the same index.
34
The Company and the bank are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines provide for five classifications, the highest of which is well capitalized. The Company and its subsidiary bank were categorized as well capitalized as of September 30, 2008. The accompanying table shows the capital ratios of the Company and Old Second National Bank, the Companys subsidiary bank, as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
Capital levels and minimum required levels:
Actual
Minimum Requiredfor CapitalAdequacy Purposes
Minimum Requiredto be WellCapitalized
Total capital to risk weighted assets
Consolidated
260,904
10.67
195,617
8.00
N/A
Old Second National Bank
278,946
11.42
195,409
244,261
10.00
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets
191,737
7.84
97,825
254,779
10.43
97,710
146,565
6.00
Tier 1 capital to average assets
6.68
114,813
8.89
114,636
143,295
5.00
218,140
10.58
164,945
235,867
11.45
164,798
205,997
194,846
9.45
82,474
219,041
10.63
82,424
123,636
7.50
103,918
8.44
103,811
129,764
The Company paid consideration of $43.0 million in cash and issued 1,563,636 shares of Company stock valued at $27.50 per share to consummate the acquisition of Heritage on February 8, 2008. As detailed in Note 9, the Company also established credit facilities with LaSalle Bank (now Bank of America) to finance the acquisition that included $45.0 million in subordinated debt. That debt obligation qualifies as Tier 2 regulatory capital. In addition, trust preferred securities qualify as Tier 1 regulatory capital, and the Company continues to treat the maximum amount of this security type allowable under regulatory guidelines as Tier 1 capital.
As previously discussed, the Company has applied to participate in the Capital Purchase Program. Participation in that program would increase both Tier 1 capital and the above ratios.
35
Liquidity is the Companys ability to fund operations, to meet depositor withdrawals, to provide for its customers credit needs, and to meet maturing obligations and existing commitments. The liquidity of the Company principally depends on cash flows from operating activities, investment in and maturity of assets, changes in balances of deposits and borrowings, and its ability to borrow funds.
Net cash inflows from operating activities were $32.4 million in the first nine months of 2008, compared with $25.5 million in the first nine months of 2007. Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale, net of funds used to originate loans held for sale, were a source of inflow for both periods. Interest received, net of interest paid, combined with changes in other assets and liabilities were a source of outflow for both periods. Management of investing and financing activities, as well as market conditions, determines the level and the stability of net interest cash flows. Managements policy is to mitigate the impact of changes in market interest rates to the extent possible, so that balance sheet growth is a principal determinant of growth in net interest cash flows.
Net cash inflows from investing activities, which included cash paid for the net assets acquired from Heritage as detailed in the supplemental cash flow information, were $42.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to net cash outflows of $173.0 million a year earlier. The cash paid for the acquisition, net of cash and cash equivalents retained, was $38.9 million. In the first nine months of 2008, securities transactions accounted for a net inflow of $168.0 million, and net principal disbursed on loans accounted for net outflows of $80.1 million. In the first nine months of 2007, securities transactions accounted for a net outflow of $41.9 million, and net principal disbursed on loans accounted for net outflows of $125.6 million. Additionally, while not large in amount, the purchase of $1.9 million of FHLBC stock increased the Companys borrowing privileges as outlined in Note 9. Cash outflows for property and equipment were $5.5 million in 2008 compared to $4.6 million in the first nine months of 2007.
Net cash outflows from financing activities in the first nine months of 2008, were $82.9 million, and the deposit, borrowing and other liabilities that were assumed in the Heritage acquisition are enumerated in the supplemental cash flow information provided. Significant cash outflows from financing activities in 2008 included reductions of $164.3 million and $78.8 million in federal funds purchased and net decreases in customer deposits, respectively. The largest financing cash inflows in 2008 were $135.8 million in other short-term borrowings, which consists primarily of Federal Home Loan Bank advances, and $45.0 million in subordinated debt proceeds that were used to finance the Heritage acquisition. Details related to the financing of the Heritage transaction and other borrowings are provided in Note 9 to the financial statements. Cash inflows from financing activities in the first nine months of 2007 were $153.2 million, which included net increases in customer deposits and repurchase agreements of $133.5 million and $15.8 million, respectively. In the same period of 2007, federal funds purchased and proceeds from the issuance of junior subordinated debentures increased $3.0 million and $25.8 million, respectively. The largest financing outflow in 2007 was the $31.2 million paid to purchase treasury stock.
As part of its normal operations, the Company is subject to interest-rate risk on the assets it invests in (primarily loans and securities) and the liabilities it funds with (primarily customer deposits and borrowed funds), as well as its ability to manage such risk. Fluctuations in interest rates may result in changes in the fair market values of the Companys financial instruments, cash flows, and net interest income. Like most financial institutions, the Company has an exposure to changes in both short-term and long-term interest rates.
The Company manages various market risks in its normal course of operations, including credit, liquidity risk, and interest-rate risk. Other types of market risk, such as foreign currency exchange risk and commodity price risk, do not arise in the normal course of the Companys business activities and operations. In addition, since the Company does not hold a trading portfolio, it is not exposed to significant market risk from trading activities. The changes in the Companys interest rate risk exposures from December 31, 2007 are outlined in the table below.
Like most financial institutions, the Companys net income can be significantly influenced by a variety of external factors, including: overall economic conditions, policies and actions of regulatory authorities, the amounts of and rates at which assets and liabilities reprice, variances in prepayment of loans and securities other than those that are assumed, early withdrawal of deposits, exercise of call options on borrowings or securities, competition, a general rise or decline in interest rates, changes in the slope of the yield-curve, changes in historical relationships between indices (such as LIBOR and prime), and balance sheet growth or contraction. The Companys asset and liability committee (ALCO) seeks to manage interest rate risk under a variety of rate environments by structuring the Companys balance sheet and off-balance sheet positions, which includes interest rate swap derivatives as discussed in Note 16 of the financial statements included in this quarterly report. The risk is monitored and managed within approved policy limits.
The Company utilizes simulation analysis to quantify the impact on income before income taxes under various rate scenarios. Specific cash flows, repricing characteristics, and embedded options of the assets and liabilities held by the Company are incorporated into the simulation model. Earnings at risk is calculated by comparing the income before income taxes of a stable interest rate environment to the income before income taxes of a different interest rate environment in order to determine the percentage change. The Company had less net interest income at risk exposure at September 30, due in part, to the balance sheet changes that resulted from the addition of Heritage. Given the Companys mix of negatively gapped interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities at December 31, 2007, the net interest margin was generally positioned to increase in 2008, which exhibited a declining rate environment throughout the year. The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) decreased the target for the Federal Funds rate by announcing a series of interest rate cuts in 2008. These decreases lowered the target rate from 4.25% at January 1, 2008 to 2.00% at September 30, 2008. The Banks prime rate decreased in correlation with the Federal Funds rate, moving from 7.25% on January 1, 2007 to 5.00% as of September 30, 2008. While interest costs associated with generating deposit growth and other sources of funds in 2008 increased funding costs, these increases were more than offset by the amount of liabilities that repriced with the general decreases in market rates. The FOMC again announced two 50 basis point cuts in the target rate on October 8 and October 29, 2008.
The following table summarizes the affect on annual income before income taxes based upon an immediate increase or decrease in interest rates of 100 and 200 basis points and no change in the slope of the yield curve:
Analysis of Net Interest Income Sensitivity
Immediate Changes in Rates
-200
+200
-100
+100
Dollar change
(3,835
(225
(901
284
Percent change
-4.4
-0.3
-1.0
+0.3
7,347
(12,647
4,775
(6,138
+9.7
-16.6
+6.3
-8.1
The amounts and assumptions used in the simulation model should not be viewed as indicative of expected actual results. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and management strategies. The above results do not take into account any management action to mitigate potential risk.
37
The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of June 30, 2008. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of September 30, 2008, the Companys internal controls were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified.
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
This document (including information incorporated by reference) contains, and future oral and written statements of the Company and its management may contain, forward-looking statements, within the meaning of such term in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, with respect to the financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business of the Company. Forward-looking statements, which may be based upon beliefs, expectations and assumptions of the Companys management and on information currently available to management, are generally identifiable by the use of words such as believe, expect, anticipate, plan, intend, estimate, may, will, would, could, should or other similar expressions. Additionally, all statements in this document, including forward-looking statements, speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any statement in light of new information or future events.
The Companys ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. The factors, which could have a material adverse effect on the operations and future prospects of the Company and its subsidiaries, are detailed in the Risk Factors section included under Item 1A. of Part I of the Companys Form 10-K. In addition to the risk factors described in that section, there are other factors that may impact any public company, including ours, which could have a material adverse effect on the operations and future prospects of the Company and its subsidiaries. These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements.
The Company and its subsidiaries have, from time to time, collection suits in the ordinary course of business against its debtors and are defendants in legal actions arising from normal business activities. Management, after consultation with legal counsel, believes that the ultimate liabilities, if any, resulting from these actions will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position of the Bank or on the consolidated financial position of the Company.
A verdict for approximately $2.0 million was entered in the Circuit Court of LaSalle County on January 17, 2007 in favor of Old Second Bank Yorkville, a previously wholly owned subsidiary of the Company that was merged into Old Second National Bank, and against an insurance company. The insurance company filed a Notice of Appeal on February 8, 2007 in the Third District Appellate Court of Illinois and oral argument took place in January of 2008. As a result, the Company will not record any amount of the judgment as income until all appeals have been exhausted and the matter has been concluded in the Companys favor.
There have been no material changes from the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1.A. Risk Factors, of the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. Please refer to that section of the Companys Form 10-K for disclosures regarding the risks and uncertainties related to the Companys business.
None.
Exhibits:
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
BY:
/s/ William B. Skoglund
William B. Skoglund
Chairman of the Board, Director
President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
/s/ J. Douglas Cheatham
J. Douglas Cheatham
Executive Vice-President and
Chief Financial Officer, Director
(principal financial officer)
DATE: November 10, 2008