Quantum Corporation
QMCO
#5889
Rank
NZ$2.18 B
Marketcap
NZ$55.45
Share price
-7.17%
Change (1 day)
140.83%
Change (1 year)

Quantum Corporation - 10-Q quarterly report FY


Text size:
Form 10-Q

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

--------------------

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 29, 1996

OR

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to
--------------------

Commission File Number 0-12390

QUANTUM CORPORATION

Incorporated Pursuant to the Laws of the State of Delaware

--------------------

IRS Employer Identification Number 94-2665054

500 McCarthy Blvd., Milpitas, California 95035

(408) 894-4000
--------------------

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [ X ] No [ ]

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of
common stock, as of October 31, 1996: 57,883,603
QUANTUM CORPORATION

10-Q REPORT

INDEX
Page
Number

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements 3

Consolidated Statements of Income 3

Consolidated Balance Sheets 4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 5

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 6


Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations 7


PART II - OTHER INFORMATION 17


SIGNATURE 19
QUANTUM CORPORATION

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands except per share data)
(unaudited)

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
Sept. 29, Oct. 1, Sept. 29, Oct. 1,
1996 1995 1996 1995
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

Sales $1,124,144 $1,033,048 $2,277,646 $1,974,363
Cost of sales 988,666 890,622 2,000,889 1,707,448
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

Gross profit 135,478 142,426 276,757 266,915

Operating expenses:
Research and development 69,549 55,147 136,214 110,258
Sales and marketing 29,812 34,802 66,007 68,505
General and administrative 16,988 15,453 38,475 27,635
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
116,349 105,402 240,696 206,398

Income from operations 19,129 37,024 36,061 60,517

Other (income) expense:
Interest expense 12,973 7,467 24,006 15,748
Interest and other income (24) (1,464) 682 (4,480)
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
12,949 6,003 24,688 11,268

Income before income taxes 6,180 31,021 11,373 49,249
Income tax provision 1,607 8,996 2,957 14,282
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

Net income $ 4,573 $ 22,025 $ 8,416 $ 34,967
========== ========== ========== ==========

Net income per share:
Primary $ 0.08 $ 0.39 $ 0.14 $ 0.65
Fully diluted $ 0.08 $ 0.37 $ 0.14 $ 0.61

Weighted average common and
common equivalent shares:
Primary 58,632 56,240 58,239 54,016
Fully diluted 58,632 63,567 58,239 62,943

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
QUANTUM CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
(unaudited)

September 29, March 31,
1996 1996
---------- ----------
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 148,594 $ 164,752
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for
doubtful accounts of $11,188 and $10,497 751,657 711,107
Inventories 358,859 459,538
Deferred taxes 109,616 109,625
Other current assets 108,527 81,472
---------- ----------

Total current assets 1,477,253 1,526,494

Property and equipment, net of accumulated
depreciation of $189,813 and $161,334 399,779 364,111
Purchased intangibles, net 46,975 66,313
Other assets 30,711 18,437
---------- ----------

$1,954,718 $1,975,355
========== ==========

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 362,971 $ 498,829
Accrued warranty expense 44,725 62,289
Accrued compensation 38,600 45,439
Income taxes payable 44,158 40,994
Accrued restructuring and exit costs 12,299 115,537
Current portion of long-term debt 44,016 4,125
Other accrued liabilities 57,172 53,929
---------- ----------

Total current liabilities 603,941 821,142

Deferred taxes 11,232 11,232
Convertible subordinated debt 338,700 374,283
Long-term debt 388,365 223,875

Shareholders' equity:
Common stock 326,187 266,946
Retained earnings 286,293 277,877
---------- ----------

Total shareholders' equity 612,480 544,823
---------- ----------

$1,954,718 $1,975,355
========== ==========

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
QUANTUM CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(unaudited)

Six Months Ended
September 29, October 1,
1996 1995
--------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 8,416 $ 34,967
Items not requiring the current use of cash:
Depreciation and amortization 59,898 46,976
Compensation related to stock plans 851 --
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (40,550) (137,126)
Inventories 100,679 (184,157)
Accounts payable (135,858) 174,543
Income taxes payable (2,989) (10,479)
Accrued warranty expense (17,564) (531)
Other assets and liabilities (110,788) (51,283)
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (137,905) (127,090)
--------- ---------

Cash flows from investing activities:
Investment in property and equipment (114,126) (98,018)
Proceeds from disposition of property and equipment 11,134 --
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (102,992) (98,018)
--------- ---------

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from long term credit facilities 300,091 225,000
Proceeds of mortgage loan 42,105 --
Principal payments on long-term credit facilities (137,815) (50,000)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net 20,358 21,160
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by financing activities 224,739 196,160
--------- ---------

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (16,158) (28,948)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 164,752 187,753
--------- ---------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 148,594 $ 158,805
========= =========

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Note received on disposition of property
and equipment $ 18,000 --
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest $ 24,899 $ 13,249
Taxes $ 6,003 $ 24,874

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
QUANTUM CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)

1. Basis of presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all
adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments which, in the
opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for
the periods shown. The results of operations for such periods are not
necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full fiscal year. Certain
prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current periods'
presentation. The accompanying financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited financial statements of Quantum Corporation for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 1996.

2. Inventories

Inventories consisted of the following:
(In thousands)
September 29, March 31,
1996 1996
------------- ----------

Materials and purchased parts $ 33,141 $119,984
Work in process 37,565 98,591
Finished goods 288,153 240,963
--------- ---------
$358,859 $459,538
========= =========


3. Net income per share

Net income per share is computed using the weighted average number of common and
dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding. Net income per share computed on
a fully diluted basis assumes conversion of the Company's outstanding
convertible subordinated debt. For the three and six month periods ended
September 29, 1996, net income per share, on a fully diluted basis, did not
assume conversion of the outstanding convertible debt because the effect would
have been anti-dilutive.

4. Debt

The Company has a senior credit facility which includes a $325 million revolving
credit line with an outstanding balance as of September 29, 1996, of $300
million. During the quarter ended September 29, 1996, the Company obtained a $75
million term loan under this credit facility with payments due in eight
quarterly installments beginning in December 1996. In addition, certain of the
related financial covenants were amended, effective for the quarter ended June
30, 1996.

The Company also extended until September 1997 an $85 million unsecured Letter
of Credit facility with certain banks to issue standby letters of credit to
Matsushita-Kotobuki Electronics and its affiliates.

In September 1996, the Company completed $42 million in mortgage financing for
certain domestic facilities at an interest rate of approximately 10.1%. The term
of the mortgage is ten years, with amortization over 20 years and a balloon
payment at the end of the 10 year term. The debt is secured by the specified
real estate.

5. Litigation

The Company and certain of its current and former officers and directors have
been named as defendants in two class action lawsuits, one filed on August 28,
1996, in the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, California, and one filed on
August 30, 1996, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
California. The plaintiff purports to represent a class of all persons who
purchased the Company's common stock between February 26, 1996, and June 13,
1996. The complaints allege that the defendants violated various federal
securities laws and California statutes by concealing and/or misrepresenting
material adverse information about the company and that individual defendants
sold shares of the Company's stock based upon material nonpublic information. On
October 23, 1996, the Company filed a Demurrer requesting dismissal of the state
action. The Company believes that both actions are without merit and intends to
defend against them vigorously. Nevertheless, litigation is subject to inherent
uncertainties and thus there can be no assurance that these suits will be
resolved favorably to the Company or will not have a material adverse effect on
the Company's financial condition and results of operations.


Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations

Results of Operations

The following discussion contains forward-looking statements within the meaning
of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements
include the expected benefits of transitioning the manufacturing of the
Company's high-capacity hard disk drive products to Matsushita-Kotobuki
Electronics Industries, Ltd. ("MKE"), of Japan, as well as management's
expectations regarding financial results for fiscal 1997. Actual results could
differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a
result of the factors set forth below in "Trends and Uncertainties" and
elsewhere in this report.

SALES. Sales for the three and six months ended September 29, 1996, were
$1,124 million and $2,278 million, respectively, compared to $1,033 million
and $1,974 million for the corresponding periods in fiscal 1996. Unit shipments
for the second quarter of fiscal 1997 increased 9% compared to the corresponding
period in fiscal 1996, with sales for the second quarter of fiscal 1997
increasing 9% over the second quarter of fiscal 1996. For the six months ended
September 29, 1996, unit shipments increased 13% and sales increased 15% over
the comparable period in fiscal 1996. The increase in sales on a year-to-year
basis was attributable to increased unit sales and a change in sales mix to
larger-capacity products in the desktop market, partially offset by a decline in
average unit prices on existing products. During the first six months of fiscal
1997, the Company experienced weakened demand for its mix of drive products for
the personal computer market and this resulted in pressure on pricing. In
addition, sales of high-capacity disk drive products continued to decline in the
second quarter as products manufactured by Quantum were being phased out and
shipments of high-capacity products manufactured by MKE had not yet begun. Sales
of a limited number of desktop and portable storage products represented a
significant majority of sales for the six months ended September 29, 1996. The
Company anticipates that this trend will continue in the future.

Sales to the top five customers for the three and six months ended September 29,
1996, represented 39% and 40% of sales, respectively, with one customer having
sales greater than 10% of sales for each period. For the corresponding periods
in fiscal 1996, sales to the top five customers represented 49% and 48% of
sales, with three customers having sales greater than 10% of sales for each
period. Any significant decrease in sales to a major customer or the loss of a
major customer could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of
operations.

GROSS MARGIN. The gross margin for the quarter ended September 29, 1996,
decreased to 12.1% from 13.8% for the second quarter of fiscal 1996. The
Company's gross margin for the first six months of fiscal 1997 was 12.2%,
compared to 13.5% for the corresponding period in fiscal 1996. Gross margin
decreased from the previous fiscal year as a result of a less favorable product
mix in the desktop market and pricing pressures in that market. In the future,
gross margin may be affected by pricing and other competitive conditions,
as well as the Company's ability to phase out the older,lower gross margin
product lines and transition to higher margin products incorporating advances
in technology. See "Trends and Uncertainties," below, for a discussion of
certain other factors that may affect the Company's gross margin.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES. Research and development expenses for the
second quarter of fiscal 1997 were $70 million, or 6.2% of sales, compared to
$55 million, or 5.3% of sales in the corresponding period in fiscal 1996. For
the first six months of fiscal 1997, research and development expenses were $136
million, or 6.0% of sales, compared to $110 million, or 5.6% of sales, in the
corresponding period in fiscal 1996. This increase in research and development
spending was due primarily to higher expenses related to preproduction activity
for a number of new products for both the desktop and the high-capacity markets.
The mass storage industry, particularly the hard disk drive business, is subject
to rapid technological advances, and the future success of the Company is
dependent upon continued development and timely introduction of new products and
technologies. As a result, the Company expects to continue to make significant
expenditures for research and development. See "Trends and Uncertainties,"
below.

SALES AND MARKETING EXPENSES. Sales and marketing expenses in the second quarter
of fiscal 1997 were $30 million, or 2.7% of sales, compared to $35 million, or
3.4% of sales in the corresponding period in fiscal 1996. Sales and marketing
expenses for the first six months of fiscal 1997 were $66 million, or 2.9% of
sales, compared to $69 million, or 3.5% of sales, in the corresponding period in
fiscal 1996. The decrease was principally due to the Company's efforts to reduce
advertising and promotional expenses for the second quarter of fiscal 1997.

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. General and administrative expenses in the
second quarter of fiscal 1997 were $17 million, or 1.5% of sales, compared to
$15 million, or 1.5% of sales in the corresponding period in fiscal 1996.
General and administrative expenses for the first six months of fiscal 1997 were
$38 million, or 1.7% of sales, compared to $28 million, or 1.4% of sales, in the
corresponding period in fiscal 1996. The increase in absolute dollars for the
quarter was primarily related to the expansion of the Company's infrastructure.
The increase for the six month period was also due to a larger bad debt expense
in the first quarter of fiscal 1997.

OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE. Net interest and other income/expense was $12.9 million
net expense for the quarter ended September 29, 1996, and $6.0 million for the
corresponding period in fiscal 1996. Net interest and other income/expense for
the six months ended September 29, 1996, was $24.7 million, compared to $11.3
million in the corresponding period in fiscal 1996. The increase in net interest
expense was the result of an increase in the level of debt.

INCOME TAXES. The effective tax rate for the quarter and six months ended
September 29, 1996, was 26% compared to the effective rate of 29% for the
corresponding periods in fiscal 1996. The lower effective tax rate was primarily
attributable to an increased percentage of tax benefit related to foreign
earnings taxed at less than the U.S. rate and the realization of deferred tax
assets previously reserved.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At September 29, 1996, the Company had $149 million in cash and cash equivalents
and short-term investments, compared to $165 million at March 31, 1996. Cash
used in operating and investing activities was primarily a result of increases
in accounts receivable and decreases in accounts payable and other current
liabilities as well as investing in property and equipment. This was partially
offset by a decrease in inventories. Cash provided by financing activities was
primarily a result of borrowing under the long-term credit facility and the
mortgage as described below.

The Company has a senior credit facility which includes a $325 million revolving
credit line with an outstanding balance as of September 29, 1996, of $300
million. During the quarter ended September 29, 1996, the Company obtained a $75
million term loan under this credit facility with payments due in eight
quarterly installments beginning in December 1996. In addition, certain of the
related financial covenants were amended, effective for the quarter ended June
30, 1996.

The Company also extended until September 1997 an $85 million unsecured Letter
of Credit facility with certain banks to issue standby letters of credit to
Matsushita-Kotobuki Electronics and its affiliates.

In September 1996, the Company completed $42 million in mortgage financing for
certain domestic facilities at an interest rate of approximately 10.1%. The term
of the mortgage is ten years, with amortization over 20 years and a balloon
payment at the end of the 10 year term. The debt is secured by the specified
real estate.

The Company expects to spend approximately $90 million for leasehold
improvements, capital equipment and expansion of the Company's facilities for
the remainder of fiscal 1997. Over the next twelve months, the Company
anticipates that capital spending will continue at a similar level. These
capital expenditures will support the recording heads and tapes businesses as
well as general corporate operations.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 1996, the Company recorded a charge associated
with the transition of manufacturing for its high-capacity hard disk drive
products to MKE. During the quarter ended September 29, 1996, there were
approximately $40 million in cash expenditures related to this charge. The
Company expects that cash expenditures related to the charge will be
approximately $5 million during the rest of fiscal 1997. Also during the
quarter, the Company completed the sale of the manufacturing facility in Penang,
Malaysia, and received $10 million in cash and a secured note in exchange.

In conjunction with the purchase of certain businesses from Digital Equipment
Corporation in October 1994, the Company recorded an accrual for costs related
to exiting a portion of the facilities and operations acquired. During the
quarter ended September 29, 1996, there were no significant cash expenditures
related to these exit costs. The Company anticipates that cash outlays for these
exit activities will be approximately $7 million over the remaining life of a
certain facility's lease.

The Company believes that its existing capital resources, including its credit
facilities and any cash generated from operations will be sufficient to meet all
currently planned expenditures and sustain operations for the remainder of the
fiscal year. However, this forward-looking statement assumes that operating
results and cash flow from operations will meet the Company's expectations, and
actual results could vary due to the factors described below in "Trends and
Uncertainties" under "Fluctuation in Results of Operations." The Company
continues to work to identify additional sources of cash and there can be no
assurance that if required, the Company will be able to obtain such financing or
obtain it on acceptable terms.

Trends and Uncertainties

FLUCTUATION IN RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. The Company's results of operations are
subject to fluctuations from period to period. In this regard, the demand for
the Company's hard disk drive products depends on the demand for the computer
systems manufactured by its customers, which is affected by computer system
product cycles and by prevailing economic conditions. Growth in demand for
computer systems, especially in the personal computer ("PC") market segment,
where the Company derives a significant amount of its disk drive sales, has
historically been subject to significant fluctuations. Such fluctuations in end
user demand have in the past, and may in the future, result in the deferral or
cancellation of orders for the Company's products, each of which would have a
material adverse effect on the Company. During the past several years, there has
been significant growth in the demand for PCs, a portion of which represented
sales of PCs for use in the home. However, many analysts predict that future
growth may be at a slower rate than the rate experienced in recent years.

In the first and second quarters of fiscal 1997, the Company experienced weak
demand for its mix of drive products for the PC market and this resulted in
pricing pressure and had an adverse impact on revenue and earnings for the six
months. The Company lost some desktop business to competitors with strong 1.6
gigabyte desktop programs at different price points. In response to the
declining demand, the Company reduced its drive build plan at MKE through the
second quarter of fiscal 1997. There can be no assurance that this decline in
demand is temporary, and the Company could experience additional decreases in
demand for its products in the near future. Any such additional slowdowns in
demand could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

The hard disk drive industry has also been subject, from time to time, to
seasonal fluctuations in demand. The Company has typically experienced
relatively flat demand in the September fiscal quarter as compared to the June
quarter and increasing demand throughout the quarters ending in December and
March. Because shipments have tended to be highest in the third month of each
quarter, the Company is taking steps to improve the linearity of shipments
throughout the quarter. If the linearity of shipments does not improve, any
failure by the Company to complete shipments in the final month of the quarter
could adversely affect the Company's operating results for the quarter.

TRANSITION OF HIGH-CAPACITY MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS TO MKE. Since the Company's
acquisition of Digital's high-capacity disk drive operations in late 1994, the
Company has experienced significant difficulties in integrating these operations
into its high-capacity business. These difficulties have included problems
involving both the development and manufacturing of its high-capacity products
and have resulted in, among other things, significant delays in meeting the
qualification standards imposed by certain major customers of the Company's
high-capacity disk drive products. As part of its strategy to address these
problems, the Company decided to transition its high-capacity disk drive product
manufacturing to MKE. As a result, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1996 the
Company incurred a charge associated with the closure of the Company's two
high-capacity disk drive manufacturing facilities in Milpitas, California and
Penang, Malaysia. These two facilities were closed during the quarter ended
September 29, 1996.

The Company's transition of its high-capacity manufacturing operations to MKE
entails several risks, and there can be no assurance that the Company's efforts
in this regard will be successful. Although the Company has had a continuous
manufacturing relationship with MKE since 1984, the Company's high-capacity
products are more complex to manufacture than its desktop products. MKE has not
previously manufactured any significant amount of the Company's high-capacity
products and there can be no assurance that the Company's previous difficulties
with its high-capacity products will be resolved or that new problems will not
arise as a result of the transition of this manufacturing to MKE. Any failure of
the Company to successfully manage this transition would have a material adverse
effect on the Company.

DEPENDENCE ON MKE RELATIONSHIP. The Company is dependent upon MKE for the
manufacture of its disk drive products. During fiscal 1996 and the first two
quarters of fiscal 1997, approximately 75% and 77%, respectively, of the
Company's sales were derived from products manufactured by MKE. The transition
of the manufacturing of the Company's high-capacity product manufacturing to MKE
will result in an increased dependence on MKE. The Company's relationship with
MKE is therefore critical to the Company's business and financial performance.

The Company's dependence on MKE entails, among others, the following principal
risks:

QUALITY AND DELIVERY. The Company relies on MKE's ability to bring new
products rapidly to volume production at low cost, to meet the
Company's stringent quality requirements and to respond quickly to
changing product delivery schedules from the Company. This requires,
among other things, close and continuous collaboration between the
Company and MKE in all phases of design, engineering, and production.
The Company's business and financial results would be adversely
affected if products manufactured by MKE fail to satisfy the Company's
quality requirements or if MKE is unable to meet the Company's delivery
commitments. In the event MKE is unable to satisfy Quantum's production
requirements, the Company would not have an alternative manufacturing
source to meet the demand without substantial delay and disruption of
the Company's operations. As a result, the Company would be materially
adversely affected.

EXTENSION OF RELATIONSHIP. The Company's relationship with MKE, which
has been continuous since 1984, is currently governed by a master
agreement, that, unless extended, will expire in December 1997. The
failure of the parties to extend their relationship on terms favorable
to the Company would have a material adverse effect on the Company.

VOLUME AND PRICING. MKE's production schedule is based on the Company's
forecasts of its product purchase requirements and the Company has only
limited rights to modify short-term purchase orders issued to MKE.
Further, the demand in the desktop business is inherently volatile and
there is no assurance that the Company's forecasts are accurate. In
addition, the Company periodically renegotiates pricing arrangements
with MKE. The failure of the Company to accurately forecast its
requirements, which could lead to inventory shortages or surpluses, or
the failure to reach pricing agreements reasonable to the Company would
have a material adverse effect on the Company.

MANUFACTURING CAPACITY AND CAPITAL COMMITMENT. The Company believes
that MKE's current and committed manufacturing capacity should be
adequate to meet the Company's requirements at least through the end of
fiscal 1997. The Company's future growth will require, however, that
MKE continue to devote substantial financial resources to property,
plant and equipment and working capital to support manufacture of the
Company's products, as to which there can be no assurance. In the event
that MKE is unable or unwilling to meet the Company's manufacturing
requirements, there can be no assurance that the Company would be able
to obtain an alternate source of supply. Any such failure to obtain an
alternative source would have a material adverse effect on the Company.

DEPENDENCE ON SUPPLIERS OF COMPONENTS AND SUB-ASSEMBLIES; COMPONENT SHORTAGES.
The Company and its manufacturing partner, MKE, are dependent upon suppliers for
components and sub-assemblies, including recording heads, media and integrated
circuits, which are essential to the manufacture of the Company's products. In
connection with certain products, the Company and MKE qualify only a single
source for certain components and sub-assemblies, which can magnify the risk of
shortages. Component shortages have constrained the Company's sales growth in
the past, and the Company believes that the industry will periodically
experience component shortages. If such shortages occur, or if the Company
experiences quality problems with component suppliers, shipments of products
could be significantly delayed or costs significantly increased, which would
have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations.

NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT. Quantum operates in an industry characterized by
increasingly rapid technological changes and short product life cycles. For
these and other reasons, including competitive pressures, gross margins on
specific products can decrease rapidly. Any delay in introduction of more
advanced and more cost-effective products can result in significantly lower
sales and gross margins. The Company's future is therefore dependent on its
ability to anticipate what the customers will demand and to develop the new
products to meet this demand. The Company must also qualify these new products
with its customers, successfully introduce these products to the market on a
timely basis and commence volume production to meet customer demands. In this
regard, the Company expects that sales of new products, particularly a limited
number of products in the desktop market, will account for a significant portion
of fiscal 1997 sales and that sales of older products will decline. However,
there can be no assurance that such products will achieve or sustain market
acceptance and failure to achieve acceptance could have a material adverse
effect on the Company.

Sales of the Company's current high-capacity products have declined during
fiscal 1997, as the Company transitions customers to new high-capacity products
to be manufactured by MKE. The new Atlas II product went into mass production at
MKE in September 1996, but it has not yet qualified with a number of customers
and there is risk in the qualification process. Atlas II is not expected to
provide a significant contribution to sales until the third fiscal quarter at
the earliest. A second high-capacity product under development is still in the
evaluation stage and is not expected to achieve volume production and contribute
significantly to sales until the fourth quarter of fiscal 1997. The Company's
product development efforts entail a number of risks, and there can be no
assurance that the Company will be successful in these efforts. The Company's
inability to successfully manage this product transition could have a material
adverse effect on the Company.

The Company is also currently engaged in a substantial effort to advance the
development of its MR recording heads. The Company believes that MR head
technology, which enables higher capacity per disk than conventional thin film
inductive heads, will replace inductive heads as the leading recording head
technology. Although MR recording heads comprised a relatively small portion of
the recording head market demand for the entire industry in 1995, the Company
expects demand to increase significantly by 1998. The Company believes that by
establishing its own supply of MR heads it can lower the risk of supply
shortages of MR heads that may occur in the future and can create cost
advantages for its overall business. However, MR technology is relatively
complex, and as is typical of new head technology, manufacturing yields begin at
relatively low levels and then possibly increase throughout the product life of
the recording head. While the Company has increased production yields in its MR
recording heads manufacturing in the past, several of the Company's important
new disk drive products which are commencing volume production during fiscal
1997 are dependent on new MR recording heads currently under development.
Increases in the current levels of production yields for these new MR recording
heads will be required for the Company to meet its manufacturing objectives for
these new disk drive products. In the event that yields do not improve, there
are limited alternative sources of supply for MR recording heads, and there can
be no assurance that the Company will be able to locate and obtain adequate
supply from such alternative sources. In such event, the Company would be
materially adversely affected.

There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in the development
and marketing of these and other new products and components that respond to
technological change or evolving industry standards, that the Company will not
experience difficulties that could delay or prevent the successful development,
introduction and marketing of these products and components, or that the
Company's new products and components will adequately meet the requirements of
the marketplace and achieve market acceptance. In addition, technological
advances in magnetic, optical or other technologies, or the development of new
technologies, could result in the introduction of competitive products with
superior performance to and substantially lower prices than the Company's
products. Further, the Company's new products and components are subject to
significant technical risks. If the Company experiences delays in the
commencement of commercial shipments of new products or components, the Company
could experience delays or loss of product sales. If the Company is unable, for
technological or other reasons, to develop and introduce new products in a
timely manner in response to changing market conditions or customer
requirements, the Company would be materially adversely affected.

CUSTOMER CONCENTRATION. As is typical in the information storage industry, the
Company's customer base is concentrated with a small number of computer systems
manufacturers. The Company's sales to its customers are generally governed by
written agreements. In general, these agreements do not obligate a customer to
purchase any minimum volume of the Company's products, and these agreements are
generally terminable at will by the customer.

Sales of the Company's desktop products, which comprise a significant majority
of its overall sales, were concentrated with several key customers during the
six months ended September 29, 1996, and the fiscal year ended March 31, 1996.
Sales to the top five customers of the Company represented 40% of total sales
for the first six months of fiscal 1997 and 44% of sales for the 1996 fiscal
year. For the first six months of fiscal 1997, sales to Compaq were
approximately 11% of total sales. Apple has been significantly restructuring its
business and Apple's share of the Company's sales, which was 11% in fiscal 1996,
has declined to less than 10% in the first six months of fiscal 1997. As a
result, it is becoming increasingly difficult for the Company to accurately
forecast the demand for its products by Apple. In addition, the Company is
unable to predict whether or not there will be any significant change in demand
for Apple's or any of its other customers' products in the future. In the event
that any such changes result in decreased demand for the Company's products,
whether by loss or delays in orders, the Company could be materially adversely
affected.

INTENSELY COMPETITIVE INDUSTRY. The information storage products industry in
general, and the disk drive industry in particular, is characterized by intense
competition which results in rapid price erosion, short product life cycles, and
continuous introduction of new, more cost-effective products offering increased
levels of capacity and performance. In this regard, the Company intends to
introduce important new products during the latter half of fiscal 1997, and
there can be no assurance that it will be successful. If this does not occur,
the Company would be materially and adversely affected. The hard disk drive
industry also tends to experience periods of excess product inventory and
intense price competition. If price competition intensifies, the Company may be
forced to lower prices further than expected, which could adversely affect its
sales and gross margin.

Quantum faces direct competition from a number of companies, including Seagate,
Western Digital, IBM, Maxtor and Exabyte. In the event that the Company is
unable to compete effectively with these or any other companies, the Company
would be materially adversely affected.

DESKTOP STORAGE PRODUCTS. In the market for desktop products, Quantum
competes primarily with Seagate, Western Digital, and Maxtor. Quantum
and its competitors have developed and are developing a number of
products targeted at particular segments of this market, such as home
PC buyers, and factors such as time to market can have a significant
effect on the success of any particular product. The desktop market is
characterized by more competitors and shorter product life cycles than
the hard disk drive market in general.

WORKSTATION AND SYSTEM STORAGE PRODUCTS. The Company faces competition
in the high-capacity disk drive market primarily from Seagate and IBM.
Seagate has the largest share of the market for high-capacity disk
drives. Although the same competitive factors generally applicable to
the overall disk drive industry apply to high-capacity disk drives, the
Company believes that the performance and quality of its products are
more important to the users in this market than to users in the desktop
market. The Company's success in the high-capacity market during the
foreseeable future is dependent on the successful development, timely
introduction and market acceptance of key new products, as to which
there can be no assurance.

SPECIALTY STORAGE PRODUCTS. In the market for tape drives, the Company
competes with a large number of companies, including Exabyte. During
fiscal 1996 and the first six months of fiscal 1997, the Company
experienced increasing market acceptance of its tape drive products.
However, a number of competitors have announced or already introduced
tape drive product offerings, and the market could become significantly
more competitive during the remainder of fiscal 1997. As a result, the
Company could experience increased price competition. If price
competition occurs, the Company may be forced to lower prices, in which
case the Company could be materially adversely affected.

Finally, the Company's customers could commence the manufacture of disk and tape
drives for their own use or for sale to others. Any such loss of customers could
have a material adverse effect on the Company.

RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH FOREIGN MANUFACTURING. Many of the Company's products are
currently manufactured outside the United States. As a result, the Company is
subject to certain risks associated with contracting with foreign manufacturers,
including obtaining requisite United States and foreign governmental permits and
approvals, currency exchange fluctuations, currency restrictions, political
instability, labor problems, trade restrictions and changes in tariff and
freight rates.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MATTERS. The hard disk drive industry has been
characterized by significant litigation relating to patent and other
intellectual property rights. From time to time, the Company is approached by
companies and individuals alleging Quantum's need for a license under patented
technology that Quantum assertedly uses. If required, there can be no assurance
that licenses to any such technology could be obtained or obtained on
commercially reasonable terms. Adverse resolution of any intellectual property
litigation could subject the Company to substantial liabilities and require it
to refrain from manufacturing certain products. In addition, the costs of
engaging in such litigation may be substantial, regardless of the outcome.

LITIGATION. The Company and certain of its current and former officers and
directors have been named as defendants in two class action lawsuits, one filed
on August 28, 1996, in the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, California, and
one filed on August 30, 1996, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of California. The plaintiff purports to represent a class of all
persons who purchased the Company's common stock between February 26, 1996, and
June 13, 1996. The complaints allege that the defendants violated various
federal securities laws and California statutes by concealing and/or
misrepresenting material adverse information about the company and that
individual defendants sold shares of the Company's stock based upon material
nonpublic information. On October 23, 1996, the Company filed a Demurrer
requesting dismissal of the state action. The Company believes that both actions
are without merit and intends to defend against them vigorously. Nevertheless,
litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties and thus there can be no
assurance that these suits will be resolved favorably to the Company or will not
have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results
of operations.

FUTURE CAPITAL NEEDS. The information storage business is capital-intensive and
competitive. Although the Company is in the process of transitioning the
manufacturing of all of its hard disk drive products to MKE, the Company
believes that in order to remain competitive in the information storage
business, it will need significant additional financial resources over the next
several years for capital expenditures, working capital and research and
development. The Company believes that it will be able to fund these capital
requirements at least through fiscal 1997. However, if the Company decides to
increase its capital expenditures further or sooner than presently contemplated,
or if results of operations do not meet the Company's expectations, the Company
will require additional debt or equity financing. There can be no assurance that
such additional funds will be available to the Company or will be available on
favorable terms. In addition, the Company may require additional capital for
other purposes not presently contemplated. If the Company is unable to obtain
sufficient capital, it could be required to curtail its capital equipment and
research and development expenditures, which could adversely affect the Company.

VOLATILITY OF STOCK PRICE. The market price of the Company's common stock has
been, and may continue to be, extremely volatile. Factors such as new product
announcements by the Company or its competitors, quarterly fluctuations in the
operating results of the Company, its competitors and other technology companies
and general conditions in the computer market may have a significant impact on
the market price of the common stock. In particular, if the Company were to
report operating results that did not meet the expectations of research
analysts, the market price of the common stock could be materially adversely
affected.
QUANTUM CORPORATION

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


Item 1. Legal proceedings

The Company and certain of its current and former officers and directors have
been named as defendants in two class action lawsuits, one filed on August 28,
1996, in the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, California, and one filed on
August 30, 1996, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
California. The plaintiff purports to represent a class of all persons who
purchased the Company's common stock between February 26, 1996, and June 13,
1996. The complaints allege that the defendants violated various federal
securities laws and California statutes by concealing and/or misrepresenting
material adverse information about the company and that individual defendants
sold shares of the Company's stock based upon material nonpublic information. On
October 23, 1996, the Company filed a Demurrer requesting dismissal of the state
action. The Company believes that both actions are without merit and intends to
defend against them vigorously. Nevertheless, litigation is subject to inherent
uncertainties and thus there can be no assurance that these suits will be
resolved favorably to the Company or will not have a material adverse effect on
the Company's financial condition and results of operations.


Item 2. Changes in securities - Not Applicable.


Item 3. Defaults upon senior securities - Not Applicable


Item 4. Submission of matters to a vote of security holders

The 1996 Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on September 3, 1996. The
matters voted upon were the election of directors, the annual incentive plan for
the company's Chief Executive Officer, the adoption of the 1996 Board of
Directors Stock Option Plan, and the appointment of the independent auditors.

The shareholders approved the election of directors as follows:

For Against
Stephen M. Berkley 45,495,497 446,510
David A. Brown 45,493,366 448,641
Michael A. Brown 45,492,307 449,700
Robert J. Casale 45,498,907 443,100
Edward M. Esber 45,498,907 443,100
Steven C. Wheelwright 45,498,663 443,344

The shareholders approved and ratified the adoption of the annual incentive plan
for the Company's Chief Executive Officer. The number of affirmative votes cast
for this matter were 41,779,003. The number of negative votes cast with respect
to this matter were 1,970,907, with 958,751 votes abstaining and 1,233,346
broker non-votes.

The shareholders approved and ratified the adoption of the 1996 Board of
Directors Stock Option Plan. There were 39,891,491 affirmative votes, 3,795,057
negative votes, 954,187 votes abstaining and 1,301,272 broker non-votes.

The appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors of the Company for
the fiscal year ending March 31, 1997, was approved with 45,727,174 affirmative
votes, 79,577 negative votes and 135,256 votes abstaining.

In addition, the shareholders voted to allow the directors to vote on any other
matters of business that might come before the meeting with 36,078,797
affirmative votes, 7,238,915 negative votes and 2,624,295 abstaining votes.


Item 5. Other information - Not Applicable


Item 6. Exhibits and reports on Form 8-K.

(a) Exhibits. The exhibits listed on the
accompanying index to exhibits immediately
following the signature page are filed as
part of this report.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K. None
SIGNATURE



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


QUANTUM CORPORATION
(Registrant)




Date: November 13, 1996 By: /s/ Richard L. Clemmer
----------------------
Richard L. Clemmer
Executive Vice President, Finance
and Chief Financial Officer
QUANTUM CORPORATION

INDEX TO EXHIBITS



Exhibit
Number


4.1 1996 Board of Directors Stock Option Plan and Form of Option Agreement,
as amended

10.39 Sixth Amendment, dated as of August 13, 1996, to Credit Agreement (dated
October 3, 1994) among Quantum Corporation and The Banks named therein
and ABN AMRO BANK N.V., San Francisco International Branch, BARCLAYS
BANK PLC and CIBC INC. as Managing Agents for the Banks, and CANADIAN
IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE as Administrative Agent and Collateral
Agent for the Banks, and BANQUE PARIBAS; THE CIT GROUP/BUSINESS
CREDIT INC.; THE MITSUBISHI TRUST AND BANKING, Los Angeles
Agency; THE SUMITOMO TRUST AND BANKING CO., LTD., Los Angeles
Agency; and BANQUE NATIONALE DE PARIS (collectively, the "New Banks")

10.40 Mortgage and Security Agreement made as of the 10th day of September
1996, by Quantum Peripherals Realty Corporation, as Mortgagor, to
CS First Boston Mortgage Capital Corporation, as Mortgagee

10.41 Deed of Trust and Security Agreement dated: As of September 10, 1996,
by Quantum Peripherals Realty Corporation (Grantor) to Public Trustee
of Boulder County, Colorado, as Trustee for the benefit of CS First
Boston Mortgage Capital Corp. (Beneficiary)

10.42 Master Lease between Quantum Peripherals Realty Corporation, Lessor,
and Quantum Corporation, Lessee, dated as of September 10, 1996

11.1 Statement of Computation of Net Income Per Share

27 Financial Data Schedule