UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015
or
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-35796
TRI Pointe Group, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
61-1763235
(State or other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
19540 Jamboree Road, Suite 300
Irvine, California 92612
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (949) 438-1400
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
¨
Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Registrant’s shares of common stock outstanding at November 1, 2015: 161,813,750
NOTE REGARDING THIS QUARTERLY REPORT
On July 7, 2015, TRI Pointe Homes, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“TRI Pointe Homes”), reorganized its corporate structure (the “Reorganization”) whereby TRI Pointe Homes became a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of TRI Pointe Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“TRI Pointe Group”). As a result of the reorganization, each share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of TRI Pointe Homes (“Homes Common Stock”) was cancelled and converted automatically into the right to receive one validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of TRI Pointe Group (“Group Common Stock”), each share having the same designations, rights, powers and preferences, and the qualifications, limitations and restrictions thereof as the shares of Homes Common Stock being so converted. TRI Pointe Group, as the successor issuer to TRI Pointe Homes (pursuant to Rule 12g-3(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), began making filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Exchange Act on July 7, 2015.
In connection with the Reorganization, TRI Pointe Group (i) became a co-issuer of TRI Pointe Homes’ 4.375% Senior Notes due 2019 and TRI Pointe Homes' 5.875% Senior Notes due 2024; and (ii) replaced TRI Pointe Homes as the borrower under TRI Pointe Homes’ existing unsecured revolving credit facility.
The business, executive officers and directors of TRI Pointe Group, and the rights and limitations of the holders of Group Common Stock immediately following the Reorganization were identical to the business, executive officers and directors of TRI Pointe Homes, and the rights and limitations of holders of Homes Common Stock immediately prior to the Reorganization.
References to “TRI Pointe”, “ the Company”, “we”, “us”, or “our” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (including in the consolidated financial statements and condensed notes thereto in this report) have the following meanings, unless the context otherwise requires:
·
For periods prior to July 7, 2015: TRI Pointe Homes and its subsidiaries
For periods from and after July 7, 2015: TRI Pointe Group and its subsidiaries
TRI POINTE GROUP, INC.
INDEX
September 30, 2015
PageNumber
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Financial Statements for TRI Pointe Group, Inc.
3
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2015 (unaudited) and December 31, 2014
Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014)
4
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Year Ended December 31, 2014 and the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 (unaudited)
5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 (unaudited)
6
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
7
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
34
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
52
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION
Legal Proceedings
53
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Item 6.
Exhibits
54
SIGNATURES
56
- 2 -
Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share amounts)
September 30,
December 31,
2015
2014
(unaudited)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
96,993
170,629
Receivables
32,921
20,118
Real estate inventories
2,576,402
2,280,183
Investments in unconsolidated entities
17,340
16,805
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net
162,162
162,563
Deferred tax assets
141,479
157,821
Other assets
84,516
105,405
Total assets
3,111,813
2,913,524
Liabilities
Accounts payable
67,747
68,860
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
210,707
210,009
Unsecured revolving credit facility
349,392
260,000
Seller financed loans
7,572
14,677
Senior notes
888,657
887,502
Total liabilities
1,524,075
1,441,048
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15)
Equity
Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued
and outstanding as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively
—
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized; 161,813,750 and
161,355,490 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2015 and
December 31, 2014, respectively
1,618
1,614
Additional paid-in capital
907,762
906,159
Retained earnings
666,796
546,407
Total stockholders’ equity
1,576,176
1,454,180
Noncontrolling interests
11,562
18,296
Total equity
1,587,738
1,472,476
Total liabilities and equity
See accompanying condensed notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
- 3 -
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
Revenues:
Home sales
642,352
471,801
1,443,855
1,023,312
Land and lot sales
4,876
5,550
74,366
36,449
Other operations
913
569
2,695
8,854
Total revenues
648,141
477,920
1,520,916
1,068,615
Expenses:
Cost of home sales
507,543
385,400
1,149,191
819,377
Cost of land and lot sales
3,451
2,317
17,324
30,245
570
556
1,724
2,755
Sales and marketing
30,038
28,393
78,958
73,096
General and administrative
26,783
20,951
83,261
57,140
Restructuring charges
2,010
7,024
2,730
9,202
Total expenses
570,395
444,641
1,333,188
991,815
Income from operations
77,746
33,279
187,728
76,800
Equity in loss of unconsolidated entities
(3
)
(82
(84
(219
Transaction expenses
(16,710
(17,216
Other income (loss), net
47
499
272
(242
Income before taxes
77,790
16,986
187,916
59,123
Provision for income taxes
(28,021
(6,021
(66,088
(16,352
Net income
49,769
10,965
121,828
42,771
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
393
(1,439
Net income available to common stockholders
50,162
120,389
Earnings per share
Basic
0.31
0.07
0.74
Diluted
Weighted average shares outstanding
161,772,893
158,931,450
161,651,177
139,550,891
162,366,744
159,158,706
162,299,282
140,213,655
- 4 -
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
Number of
Additional
Total
Common
Paid-in
Retained
Stockholders'
Noncontrolling
Shares (Note 1)
Stock
Capital
Earnings
Interests
Balance at December 31, 2013
129,700,000
1,297
333,589
462,210
797,096
28,421
825,517
84,197
Capital contribution by Weyerhaeuser, net
63,355
Common shares issued in connection with
the Merger (Note 2)
31,632,533
317
498,656
498,973
Shares issued under share-based awards
22,957
176
Excess tax benefit of share-based awards, net
1,757
Stock-based compensation expense
8,626
Distributions to noncontrolling interests, net
(17,248
Net effect of consolidations, de-consolidations
and other transactions
7,123
Balance at December 31, 2014
161,355,490
1,439
Adjustment to capital contribution by
Weyerhaeuser, net
(6,747
458,260
1,612
1,616
392
Minimum tax withholding paid on behalf of
employees for restricted stock units
(2,190
8,536
(4,917
(3,256
Balance at September 30, 2015
161,813,750
- 5 -
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
5,416
10,578
Equity in loss of unconsolidated entities, net
84
219
Deferred income taxes, net
16,342
21,937
Amortization of stock-based compensation
7,518
Charges for impairments and lot option abandonments
1,903
1,124
Bridge commitment fee
10,322
Changes in assets and liabilities:
(305,889
(249,890
(12,803
34,107
25,490
(6,484
(1,113
(822
195
(11,874
Other operating cash flows
65
Net cash used in operating activities
(140,011
(140,429
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment
(1,059
(6,068
Cash acquired in the Merger
53,800
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
22
(1,458
(573
Distributions from unconsolidated entities
319
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
(2,198
47,181
Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings from debt
140,000
50,000
Repayment of debt
(57,713
Debt issuance costs
(2,688
(23,003
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes
886,698
(10,322
Repayment of debt payable to Weyerhaeuser
(623,589
Decrease in book overdrafts
(22,492
Distributions to Weyerhaeuser
(8,860
Net (repayments) proceeds of debt held by variable interest entities
(5,927
5,120
Contributions from noncontrolling interests
4,281
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
(9,198
(18,703
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under share-based awards
Excess tax benefits of share-based awards
1,572
Minimum tax withholding paid on behalf of employees for share-based awards
Net cash provided by financing activities
68,573
236,421
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
(73,636
143,173
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period
4,510
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period
147,683
- 6 -
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.
Organization, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization
The Company is engaged in the design, construction and sale of innovative single-family homes through its portfolio of six quality brands across eight states, including Maracay Homes in Arizona, Pardee Homes in California and Nevada, Quadrant Homes in Washington, Trendmaker Homes in Texas, TRI Pointe Homes in California and Colorado and Winchester Homes in Maryland and Virginia.
Reorganization
On July 7, 2015, TRI Pointe Homes, Inc., a Delaware corporation, (“TRI Pointe Homes”) reorganized its corporate structure (the “Reorganization”) whereby TRI Pointe Homes became a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of TRI Pointe Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“TRI Pointe Group”). See “Note Regarding This Quarterly Report” for information concerning the reorganization effected on July 7, 2015.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) as contained within the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”).
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries as described in “Reverse Acquisition” below, as well as other entities in which the Company has a controlling interest and variable interest entities (“VIEs”) in which the Company is the primary beneficiary. The noncontrolling interests as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 represent the outside owners’ interests in the Company’s consolidated entities and the net equity of the VIE owners. All significant intercompany accounts have been eliminated upon consolidation. Subsequent events have been evaluated through the date the financial statements were issued. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation with respect to interim financial statements, have been included.
The Company has historically experienced, and expects to continue to experience, variability in quarterly results. The results of operations for the three or nine months ended September 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.
Reverse Acquisition
On July 7, 2014 (the “Closing Date”), TRI Pointe consummated the previously announced merger (the “Merger”) of our wholly owned subsidiary, Topaz Acquisition, Inc. (“Merger Sub”), with and into Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company (“WRECO”), with WRECO surviving the Merger and becoming our wholly owned subsidiary, as contemplated by the Transaction Agreement, dated as of November 3, 2013 (the “Transaction Agreement”), by and among us, Weyerhaeuser Company (“Weyerhaeuser”), WRECO and Merger Sub. The Merger is accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”). For accounting purposes, the Merger is treated as a “reverse acquisition” and WRECO is considered the accounting acquirer. Accordingly, WRECO is reflected as the predecessor and acquirer and therefore the accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect the historical consolidated financial statements of WRECO for all periods presented and do not include the historical financial statements of TRI Pointe prior to the Closing Date. Subsequent to the Closing Date, the consolidated financial statements reflect the results of the combined company.
- 7 -
See Note 2, Merger with Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company, for further information on the Merger. In the Merger, each issued and outstanding WRECO common share was converted into 1.297 shares of TRI Pointe common stock. The historical issued and outstanding WRECO common shares (100,000,000 common shares for all periods presented prior to the Merger) have been recast (as 129,700,000 common shares of the Company for all periods prior to the Merger) in all periods presented to reflect this conversion.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of these financial statements requires our management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosures of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from our estimates.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In April 2014, the FASB issued amendments to Accounting Standards Update 2014-08, Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. The update requires that a disposal representing a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s financial results or a business activity classified as held for sale should be reported as discontinued operations. The amendments also expand the disclosure requirements for discontinued operations and add new disclosures for individually significant dispositions that do not qualify as discontinued operations. We adopted ASU 2014-08 on January 1, 2015 and the adoption had no impact on our current or prior year financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”). The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps: identify the contract(s) with a customer; identify the performance obligations in the contract; determine the transaction price; allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. ASU 2014-09 supersedes the revenue-recognition requirements in ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, most industry-specific guidance throughout the industry topics of the accounting standards codification, and some cost guidance related to construction-type and production-type contracts. On July 9, 2015, the FASB voted to defer the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 by one year and it is now effective for public entities for the annual periods ending after December 15, 2017, and for annual and interim periods thereafter. Companies may use either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach to adopt ASU 2014-09. Early adoption is permitted, but can be no earlier than the original public entity effective date of fiscal years, and the interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. We are currently evaluating the approach for implementation and the potential impact of adopting this guidance on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 (“ASU 2014-15”), Presentation of Financial Statements — Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, which requires management to evaluate, in connection with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period, whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable) and provide related disclosures. ASU 2014-15 is effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual and interim periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. We believe the adoption of this guidance will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-02, (“ASU 2015-02”), Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis. ASU 2015-02 changes the analysis that a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. ASU 2015-02 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015. We believe the adoption of ASU 2015-02 will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
- 8 -
In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-03, (“ASU 2015-03”), Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30), and as amended in August 2015 by Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-15, Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements, which changes the presentation of debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability in financial statements. Under ASU 2015-03, an entity presents such costs in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the related debt liability rather than as an asset. The FASB will permit debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit agreements to be deferred and presented as an asset, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. Amortization of the costs is reported as interest expense. ASU 2015-03 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company plans to early adopt this guidance at the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2015. Had the Company early adopted ASU 2015-03, the impact for the period ended September 30, 2015 on our consolidated balance sheet would have been a balance sheet reclassification of deferred loan costs currently included in Other Assets resulting in a decrease to Other Assets of $23.6 million, a decrease to Senior Notes of $21.2 million and a decrease to unsecured revolving credit facility of $2.4 million. The impact for the period ended December 31, 2014, would have been a decrease to Other Assets of $23.7 million and a decrease to Senior Notes of $23.7 million.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in our consolidated financial statements for prior years have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
2.
Merger with Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company
In the Merger, TRI Pointe issued 129,700,000 shares of TRI Pointe common stock to the former holders of WRECO common shares, together with cash in lieu of any fractional shares. On the Closing Date, WRECO became a wholly owned subsidiary of TRI Pointe. Immediately following the consummation of the Merger, the ownership of TRI Pointe common stock on a fully diluted basis was as follows: (i) the WRECO common shares held by former Weyerhaeuser shareholders were converted into the right to receive, in the aggregate, 79.6% of the then outstanding TRI Pointe common stock, (ii) the TRI Pointe common stock outstanding immediately prior to the consummation of the Merger represented 19.4% of the then outstanding TRI Pointe common stock, and (iii) the outstanding equity awards of WRECO and TRI Pointe employees represented the remaining 1.0% of the then outstanding TRI Pointe common stock. On the Closing Date, the former direct parent entity of WRECO paid TRI Pointe $31.5 million in cash in accordance with the Transaction Agreement. Following the Merger, WRECO changed its name to TRI Pointe Holdings, Inc.
Assumption of Senior Notes
On the Closing Date, TRI Pointe Homes assumed WRECO’s obligations as issuer of $450 million aggregate principal amount of its 4.375% Senior Notes due 2019 (the “2019 Notes”) and $450 million aggregate principal amount of its 5.875% Senior Notes due 2024 (the “2024 Notes” and together with the 2019 Notes, the “Senior Notes”). Additionally, WRECO and certain of its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Guarantors”) entered into supplemental indentures pursuant to which they guaranteed TRI Pointe’s obligations with respect to the Senior Notes. The Guarantors also entered into a joinder agreement to the Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 4, 2014, among WRECO, TRI Pointe, and the initial purchasers of the Senior Notes (collectively, the “Initial Purchasers”), pursuant to which the Guarantors became parties to the Purchase Agreement. Additionally, TRI Pointe and the Guarantors entered into joinder agreements to the Registration Rights Agreements, dated as of June 13, 2014, among WRECO and the Initial Purchasers with respect to the Senior Notes, pursuant to which TRI Pointe and the Guarantors were joined as parties to the Registration Rights Agreements. In connection with the Reorganization, TRI Pointe Group became a co-issuer with TRI Pointe Homes of the Senior Notes.
The net proceeds of $861.3 million from the offering of the Senior Notes were deposited into two separate escrow accounts following the closing of the offering on June 13, 2014. Upon release of the escrowed funds on the Closing Date and prior to the consummation of the Merger, WRECO paid $743.7 million in cash to its former direct parent, which cash was retained by Weyerhaeuser and its subsidiaries (other than WRECO and its subsidiaries). The payment consisted of the $739.0 million Payment Amount (as defined in the Transaction Agreement) as well as $4.7 million in payment of all unpaid interest on the debt payable to Weyerhaeuser that accrued from November 3, 2013 to the Closing Date. The remaining $117.6 million of proceeds was retained by TRI Pointe.
- 9 -
Fair Value of Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed
The following table summarizes the calculation of the fair value of the total consideration transferred and the provisional amounts recognized as of the Closing Date (in thousands, except shares and closing stock price):
Calculation of consideration transferred
TRI Pointe shares outstanding
TRI Pointe closing stock price on July 7, 2014
15.85
Consideration attributable to common stock
501,376
Consideration attributable to TRI Pointe share-based
equity awards
1,072
Total consideration transferred
502,448
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed
Accounts receivable
654
539,677
Intangible asset
17,300
Goodwill
139,304
28,060
Total assets acquired
778,795
26,105
23,114
Notes payable and other borrowings
227,128
Total liabilities assumed
276,347
Total net assets acquired
Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other assets, accounts payable, accrued payroll liabilities, and accrued expenses and other liabilities were generally stated at historical carrying values given the short-term nature of these assets and liabilities. Notes payable and other borrowings are stated at carrying value due to the limited amount of time since the notes payable and other borrowings were entered into prior to the Closing Date.
The Company determined the fair value of real estate inventories on a community-by-community basis primarily using a combination of market-comparable land transactions, land residual analysis and discounted cash flow models. The estimated fair value is significantly impacted by estimates related to expected average selling prices, sales pace, cancellation rates and construction and overhead costs. Such estimates must be made for each individual community and may vary significantly between communities.
The fair value of the acquired intangible asset was determined based on a valuation performed by an independent valuation specialist. The $17.3 million intangible asset is related to the TRI Pointe Homes trade name which is deemed to have an indefinite useful life.
Goodwill is primarily attributed to expected synergies from combining WRECO’s and TRI Pointe’s existing businesses, including, but not limited to, expected cost synergies from overhead savings resulting from streamlining certain redundant corporate functions, improved operating efficiencies, including provision of certain corporate level administrative and support functions at a lower cost than was historically allocated to WRECO for such services by its former direct parent, and growth of ancillary operations in various markets as permitted under applicable law, including a mortgage business, a title company and other ancillary operations. The Company also anticipates opportunities for growth through expanded geographic and customer segment diversity and the ability to leverage additional brands. The acquired goodwill is not deductible for income tax purposes.
The Company completed its business combination accounting during the first quarter of 2015.
- 10 -
Supplemental Pro Forma Information (Unaudited)
The following represents unaudited pro forma operating results as if the acquisition had been completed as of January 1, 2014 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2014
Nine Months Ended
479,879
1,230,722
21,934
66,902
Earnings per share – basic
0.14
0.41
Earnings per share – diluted
The unaudited pro forma operating results have been determined after adjusting the operating results of TRI Pointe to reflect the purchase accounting and other acquisition adjustments including interest expense associated with the debt used to fund a portion of the Merger. The unaudited pro forma results do not reflect any cost savings, operating synergies or other enhancements that we may achieve as a result of the Merger or the costs necessary to integrate the operations to achieve these cost savings and synergies. Accordingly, the unaudited pro forma amounts are for comparative purposes only and may not necessarily reflect the results of operations had the Merger been completed at the beginning of the period or be indicative of the results we will achieve in the future.
3.
Restructuring
In connection with the Merger, the Company initiated a restructuring plan to reduce duplicate corporate and divisional overhead costs and expenses. In addition, WRECO previously recognized restructuring expenses related to general cost reduction initiatives. Restructuring costs were comprised of the following (in thousands):
Employee-related costs
1,433
6,817
1,568
8,124
Lease termination costs
577
207
1,162
1,078
Employee-related costs incurred during the three months ended September 30, 2014 included employee retention and severance-related expenses of $5.5 million and stock-based compensation expense of $1.3 million for employees terminated during the period. Employee-related costs incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 included employee retention and severance-related expenses of $6.8 million and stock-based compensation expense of $1.3 million for employees terminated during the period. Lease termination costs for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, and 2014, respectively, relate to contract terminations as a result of general cost reduction initiatives.
Changes in employee-related restructuring reserves were as follows (in thousands):
Accrued employee-related costs, beginning of
period
109
3,844
4,336
Current year charges
6,857
Adjustments to pre-existing reserves
(83
Payments
(1,004
(1,576
(4,874
(7,219
Accrued employee-related costs, end of period
455
3,974
- 11 -
Changes in lease termination related restructuring reserves were as follows (in thousands):
Accrued lease termination costs, beginning of
644
2,454
1,394
3,506
(705
(902
(2,040
(2,825
Accrued lease termination costs, end of period
516
1,759
Employee and lease termination restructuring reserves are included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets.
4.
Segment Information
Our operations consist of six homebuilding companies that acquire and develop land and construct and sell single-family homes. In accordance with ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting, in determining the most appropriate reportable segments, we considered similar economic and other characteristics, including product types, average selling prices, gross profits, production processes, suppliers, subcontractors, regulatory environments, land acquisition results, and underlying demand and supply. Based on our aggregation analysis, we have not exercised any aggregation of our operating segments, which are represented by the following six reportable segments: Maracay Homes, consisting of operations in Arizona; Pardee Homes, consisting of operations in California and Nevada; Quadrant Homes, consisting of operations in Washington; Trendmaker Homes, consisting of operations in Texas; TRI Pointe Homes, consisting of operations in California and Colorado; and Winchester Homes, consisting of operations in Maryland and Virginia.
Corporate is a non-operating segment that develops and implements company-wide strategic initiatives and provides support to our homebuilding reporting segments by centralizing certain administrative functions, such as marketing, legal, accounting, treasury, insurance and risk management, information technology and human resources, to benefit from economies of scale. Our Corporate non-operating segment also includes general and administrative expenses related to operating our corporate headquarters. A portion of the expenses incurred by Corporate is allocated to the homebuilding reporting segments.
The reportable segments follow the same accounting policies as our consolidated financial statements described in Note 1. Operational results of each reportable segment are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have been achieved had the reportable segment been an independent, stand-alone entity during the periods presented.
- 12 -
Total revenues and income before taxes for each of our reportable segments were as follows (in thousands):
Maracay Homes
50,505
37,301
116,556
107,576
Pardee Homes
172,957
134,409
424,680
352,118
Quadrant Homes
48,173
32,919
132,698
96,958
Trendmaker Homes
81,044
69,711
203,235
198,867
TRI Pointe Homes
224,544
123,445
462,136
Winchester Homes
70,918
80,135
181,611
189,651
Income (loss) before taxes
3,750
2,212
5,858
8,222
39,749
21,787
121,041
47,580
3,982
649
6,329
6,889
7,496
7,327
17,896
21,529
29,556
8,685
55,251
1,726
6,941
8,064
17,978
Corporate
(8,469
(30,615
(26,523
(51,760
Total real estate inventories and total assets for each of our reportable segments, as of the date indicated, were as follows (in thousands):
205,432
153,577
1,013,792
924,362
193,374
153,493
191,803
176,696
678,564
613,666
293,437
258,389
221,190
170,932
1,080,599
1,000,489
206,986
167,796
219,869
195,829
847,013
781,301
312,932
281,547
223,224
315,630
- 13 -
5.
Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the components used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):
Numerator:
Denominator:
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding
Effect of dilutive shares:
Stock options and unvested restricted
stock units
593,851
227,256
648,105
662,764
Diluted weighted-average shares
outstanding
Antidilutive unvested restricted stock units and
stock options not included in diluted earnings
per share
2,260,532
3,634,614
2,462,268
6.
Receivables consisted of the following (in thousands):
Escrow proceeds and other accounts receivable, net
22,128
9,771
Warranty insurance receivable (Note 15)
10,493
10,047
Notes and contracts receivable
300
Total receivables
7.
Real Estate Inventories
Real estate inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
Real estate inventories owned:
Homes completed or under construction
749,852
461,712
Land under development
1,380,298
1,391,303
Land held for future development
257,610
245,673
Model homes
127,815
103,270
Total real estate inventories owned
2,515,575
2,201,958
Real estate inventories not owned:
Land purchase and land option deposits
42,329
44,155
Consolidated inventory held by VIEs
18,498
34,070
Total real estate inventories not owned
60,827
78,225
Total real estate inventories
Homes completed or under construction is comprised of costs associated with homes in various stages of construction and includes direct construction and related land acquisition and land development costs. Land under development primarily consists of land acquisition and land development costs, which include capitalized interest and real estate taxes, associated with land undergoing improvement activity. Land held for future development principally reflects land acquisition and land development costs related to land where development activity has not yet begun or has been suspended, but is expected to occur in the future.
- 14 -
Real estate inventories not owned represents deposits related to land purchase and land option agreements as well as consolidated inventory held by variable interest entities. For further details, see Note 9, Variable Interest Entities.
During the second quarter ended June 30, 2015 the Company sold a 15.72 acre employment center located in the Pacific Highlands Ranch community in the San Diego, California division of our Pardee Homes reporting segment. The land sold under this sale was classified as land under development and represented $53.0 million of land and lot sales revenue in the consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.
Interest incurred, capitalized and expensed were as follows (in thousands):
Interest incurred
15,454
15,129
45,779
25,718
Interest capitalized
(15,454
(14,839
(45,779
(22,987
Interest expensed
290
2,731
Capitalized interest in beginning inventory
140,106
113,765
124,461
138,233
Interest capitalized as a cost of inventory
14,839
22,987
Interest previously capitalized as a cost of
inventory, included in cost of sales
(13,339
(7,835
(28,019
(40,451
Capitalized interest in ending inventory
142,221
120,769
Interest is capitalized to real estate inventory during development and other qualifying activities. Interest that is capitalized to real estate inventory is included in cost of home sales as related units are delivered. Interest that is expensed as incurred is included in other income (expense).
Real estate inventory impairments and land and lot option abandonments
Real estate inventory impairments and land option abandonments consisted of the following (in thousands):
Real estate inventory impairments
29
248
1,073
Land and lot option abandonments and
pre-acquisition costs
336
304
830
824
365
552
Impairments of real estate inventory relate primarily to projects or communities that include homes completed or under construction. Within a project or community, there may be individual homes or parcels of land that are currently held for sale. Impairment charges recognized as a result of adjusting individual held-for-sale assets within a community to estimated fair value less cost to sell are also included in the total impairment charges above. Charges for inventory impairments are expensed to cost of sales.
In addition to owning land and residential lots, we also have option agreements to purchase land and lots at a future date. We have option deposits and capitalized pre-acquisition costs associated with the optioned land and lots. When the economics of a project no longer support acquisition of the land or lots under option, we may elect not to move forward with the acquisition. Option deposits and capitalized pre-acquisition costs associated with the assets under option may be forfeited at that time. Charges for such forfeitures are expensed to cost of sales.
8.
Investments in Unconsolidated Entities
As of September 30, 2015, we held equity investments in six active real estate partnerships or limited liability companies. Our participation in these entities may be as a developer, a builder, or an investment partner. Our ownership percentage varies from 7% to 55%, depending on the investment, with no controlling interest held in any of these investments.
- 15 -
Investments Held
Our cumulative investment in entities accounted for on the equity method, including our share of earnings and losses, consisted of the following (in thousands):
Limited liability company interests
14,079
13,710
General partnership interests
3,261
3,095
Unconsolidated Financial Information
Aggregated assets, liabilities and operating results of the entities we account for as equity-method investments are provided below. Because our ownership interest in these entities varies, a direct relationship does not exist between the information presented below and the amounts that are reflected on our consolidated balance sheets as our investment in unconsolidated entities or on our consolidated statement of operations as equity in loss of unconsolidated entities.
Assets and liabilities of unconsolidated entities (in thousands):
Cash
19,282
17,154
12,916
9,550
91,712
95,500
882
620
124,792
122,824
Liabilities and equity
Accounts payable and other liabilities
14,293
10,914
Company’s equity
Outside interests’ equity
93,159
95,105
Results of operations from unconsolidated entities (in thousands):
Net sales
1,217
184
2,670
591
Other operating expense
(1,479
(1,215
(4,020
(3,372
Other income
(263
2
(256
16
Net loss
(525
(1,029
(1,606
(2,765
Company’s equity in loss of unconsolidated entities
9.
Variable Interest Entities
In the ordinary course of business, we enter into land option agreements in order to procure land and residential lots for future development and the construction of homes. The use of such land option agreements generally allows us to reduce the risks associated with direct land ownership and development, and reduces our capital and financial commitments. Pursuant to these land option agreements, we generally provide a deposit to the seller as consideration for the right to purchase land at different times in the future, usually at predetermined prices. Such deposits are recorded as land purchase and land option deposits under real estate inventories not owned in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
- 16 -
We analyze each of our land option agreements and other similar contracts under the provisions of ASC 810 Consolidation to determine whether the land seller is a VIE and, if so, whether we are the primary beneficiary. Although we do not have legal title to the underlying land, if we are determined to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE, we will consolidate the VIE in our financial statements and reflect its assets as real estate inventory not owned included in our real estate inventories, its liabilities as debt (nonrecourse) held by VIEs in accrued expenses and other liabilities and the net equity of the VIE owners as noncontrolling interests on our consolidated balance sheets. In determining whether we are the primary beneficiary, we consider, among other things, whether we have the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance. Such activities would include, among other things, determining or limiting the scope or purpose of the VIE, selling or transferring property owned or controlled by the VIE, or arranging financing for the VIE.
Creditors of the entities with which we have land option agreements have no recourse against us. The maximum exposure to loss under our land option agreements is limited to non-refundable option deposits and any capitalized pre-acquisition costs. In some cases, we have also contracted to complete development work at a fixed cost on behalf of the land owner and budget shortfalls and savings will be borne by us.
The following provides a summary of our interests in land option agreements (in thousands):
December 31, 2014
Remaining
Consolidated
Purchase
Inventory
Deposits
Price
Held by VIEs
Consolidated VIEs
4,696
14,140
8,071
43,432
Unconsolidated VIEs
8,150
22,781
N/A
13,309
129,637
Other land option agreements
34,179
308,438
30,846
284,819
47,025
345,359
52,226
457,888
Unconsolidated VIEs represent land option agreements that were not consolidated because we were not the primary beneficiary. Other land option agreements were not considered VIEs.
In addition to the deposits presented in the table above, our exposure to loss related to our land option contracts consisted of capitalized pre-acquisition costs of $4.6 million and $5.3 million as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. These pre-acquisition costs were included in real estate inventories as land under development on our consolidated balance sheets.
10.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
In connection with the Merger, $139.3 million of goodwill has been recorded as of September 30, 2015. For further details on the goodwill, see Note 2, Merger with Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company.
We have two intangible assets recorded as of September 30, 2015, including an existing trade name from the acquisition of Maracay Homes in 2006 which has a 20 year useful life, and TRI Pointe Homes, resulting from the Merger in 2014 which has an indefinite useful life. For further details on the TRI Pointe Homes trade name see Note 2, Merger with Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company.
Goodwill and other intangible assets consisted of the following (in thousands):
Gross
Net
Carrying
Accumulated
Amount
Amortization
139,303
Trade names
27,979
(5,120
22,859
(4,720
23,259
167,282
167,283
The remaining useful life of our amortizing intangible asset related to the Maracay Homes trade name was 10.4 and 11.2 years as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Amortization expense related to this intangible asset was $134,000 for each of the three month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively and was $400,000 for each of the nine month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Amortization of this intangible asset was charged to sales and marketing expense. Our $17.3 million indefinite life intangible asset related to the TRI Pointe Homes trade name is not amortizing. All trade names are evaluated for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist.
- 17 -
Expected amortization of our intangible asset related to Maracay Homes for the remainder of 2015, the next four years and thereafter is (in thousands):
Remainder of 2015
134
2016
534
2017
2018
2019
Thereafter
3,289
5,559
11.
Other Assets
Other assets consisted of the following (in thousands):
Prepaid expenses
20,989
29,111
Refundable fees and other deposits
16,576
15,581
Development rights, held for future use or sale
6,447
7,409
Deferred loan costs
23,617
23,686
Operating properties and equipment, net
8,869
11,719
Income tax receivable
1,808
10,713
Other
6,210
7,186
12.
Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
Accrued payroll and related costs
21,544
24,717
Warranty reserves (Note 15)
36,743
33,270
Estimated cost for completion of real estate inventories
62,047
54,437
Customer deposits
19,734
14,229
Debt (nonrecourse) held by VIEs
3,286
9,512
Income tax liability to Weyerhaeuser (Note 18)
8,600
15,659
Liability for uncertain tax positions (Note 17)
16,563
13,797
Accrued interest
13,976
3,059
Accrued insurance expense
1,975
9,180
26,239
32,149
13.
Senior Notes, Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility and Seller Financed Loans
Senior Notes
Senior Notes consisted of the following (in thousands):
4.375% Senior Notes due June 15, 2019, net of discount
446,186
445,501
5.875% Senior Notes due June 15, 2024, net of discount
442,471
442,001
- 18 -
As discussed in Note 2, Merger with Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company, on the Closing Date, TRI Pointe assumed WRECO’s obligations as issuer of the Senior Notes. The 2019 Notes were issued at 98.89% of their aggregate principal amount and the 2024 Notes were issued at 98.15% of their aggregate principal amount. The net proceeds of $861.3 million, after debt issuance costs and discounts, from the offering were deposited into two separate escrow accounts following the closing of the offering on June 13, 2014.
The 2019 Notes and the 2024 Notes mature on June 15, 2019 and June 15, 2024, respectively. Interest is payable semiannually in arrears on June 15 and December 15. As of September 30, 2015, no principal has been paid on the Senior Notes, and there was $21.2 million of capitalized debt financing costs, included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheet, related to the Senior Notes that will amortize over the lives of the Senior Notes. Accrued interest related to the Senior Notes was $13.5 million and $1.9 million as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.
Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility
Unsecured revolving credit facility consisted of the following (in thousands):
In May 2015, the Company amended its unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) from $425 million to $550 million. The Credit Facility matures on May 18, 2019, and contains a sublimit of $75 million for letters of credit. The Company may borrow under the Credit Facility in the ordinary course of business to fund its operations, including its land development and homebuilding activities. Borrowings under the Credit Facility will be governed by, among other things, a borrowing base. Interest rates on borrowings under the Credit Facility will be based on either a daily Eurocurrency base rate or a Eurocurrency rate, in either case, plus a spread ranging from 1.45% to 2.20%, depending on the Company’s leverage ratio. As of September 30, 2015, the outstanding balance under the Credit Facility was $349.4 million with an interest rate of 2.16% per annum and $192.4 million of availability after considering the borrowing base provisions and outstanding letters of credit. As of September 30, 2015 there was $2.4 million of capitalized debt financing costs, included in Other Assets on our consolidated balance sheet, related to the Credit Facility that will amortize over the life of the Credit Facility, maturing on May 18, 2019. Accrued interest related to the Credit Facility was $376,000 and $620,000 as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.
At September 30, 2015 we had outstanding letters of credit of $8.2 million. These letters of credit were issued to secure various financial obligations. We believe it is not probable that any outstanding letters of credit will be drawn upon.
Seller Financed Loans
Seller financed loans consisted of the following (in thousands):
As of September 30, 2015, the Company had $7.6 million outstanding related to seller financed loans to acquire lots for the construction of homes. Principal and interest payments on these loans are due at various maturity dates, including at the time individual homes associated with the acquired land are delivered. As of September 30, 2015, the seller financed loans accrue interest at a weighted average rate of 6.95% per annum, with interest calculated on a daily basis. Any remaining unpaid balance on these loans is due in May 2016. Accrued interest on these loans was $122,000 and $517,000 as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.
- 19 -
Interest Incurred
During the three month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred interest of $15.5 million and $15.1 million, respectively, related to all notes payable and Senior Notes outstanding during the period. Of the interest incurred, $15.5 million and $14.8 million was capitalized to inventory for the three month period ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Included in interest incurred was amortization of deferred financing and Senior Note discount costs of $1.5 million and $1.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. During the nine month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred interest of $45.8 million and $25.7 million, respectively, related to all notes payable, Senior Notes and debt payable to Weyerhaeuser outstanding during the period. Of the interest incurred, $45.8 million and $23.0 million was capitalized to inventory for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Included in interest incurred was amortization of deferred financing and Senior Note discount costs of $3.9 million and $ 1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Accrued interest related to all outstanding debt at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was $14.0 million and $3.1 million, respectively.
Covenant Requirements
The Senior Notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to, among other things, create liens or other encumbrances, enter into sale and leaseback transactions, or merge or sell all or substantially all of our assets. These limitations are subject to a number of qualifications and exceptions.
Under the Credit Facility, the Company is required to comply with certain financial covenants, including but not limited to (i) a minimum consolidated tangible net worth; (ii) a maximum total leverage ratio; and (iii) a minimum interest coverage ratio.
The Company was in compliance with all applicable financial covenants as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
14.
Fair Value Disclosures
Fair Value Measurements
ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines “fair value” as the price that would be received for selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at measurement date and requires assets and liabilities carried at fair value to be classified and disclosed in the following three categories:
Level 1—Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets
Level 2—Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are inactive; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets at measurement date
Level 3—Valuations derived from techniques where one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable in active markets at measurement date
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
A summary of assets and liabilities at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, related to our financial instruments, measured at fair value on a recurring basis, is set forth below (in thousands):
Hierarchy
Book Value
Fair Value
Receivables (1)
Level 3
Senior Notes (2)
Level 2
878,625
896,625
Unsecured revolving credit facility (3)
Seller financed loans (4)
At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximated fair value.
(1)
The book value of our receivables equaled the fair value as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 due to the short-term nature of the remaining receivables.
(2)
The estimated fair value of our Senior Notes at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 is based on quoted market prices.
- 20 -
(3)
We believe that the carrying value of our Credit Facility approximates fair value based on the short term nature of the current market rate amended on May 18, 2015.
(4)
We believe that the carrying value of our Seller financed loans approximates fair value based on a two year treasury curve analysis.
Fair Value of Nonfinancial Assets
Nonfinancial assets include items such as real estate inventories and long-lived assets that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis when events and circumstances indicate the carrying value is not recoverable. The following table presents impairment charges and the remaining net fair value for nonfinancial assets that were measured during the periods presented (in thousands):
Year Ended
Impairment
Net of
Charge
20,409
931
20,329
15.
Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Matters
Lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been and may be instituted or asserted against us in the normal course of business, including actions brought on behalf of various classes of claimants. We are also subject to local, state and federal laws and regulations related to land development activities, house construction standards, sales practices, employment practices and environmental protection. As a result, we are subject to periodic examinations or inquiry by agencies administering these laws and regulations.
We record a reserve for potential legal claims and regulatory matters when they are probable of occurring and a potential loss is reasonably estimable. We accrue for these matters based on facts and circumstances specific to each matter and revise these estimates when necessary. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting outcomes of legal claims and related contingencies, we generally cannot predict their ultimate resolution, related timing or eventual loss. Accordingly, it is possible that the ultimate outcome of any matter, if in excess of a related accrual or if no accrual was made, could be material to our financial statements. For matter as to which the Company believes a loss is probable and reasonably estimable, it had legal reserves of $468,000 and $273,000 at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.
Warranty
Warranty reserves are accrued as home deliveries occur. Our warranty reserves on homes delivered will vary based on product type and geographic area and also depending on state and local laws. The warranty reserve is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets and represents expected future costs based on our historical experience over previous years. Estimated warranty costs are charged to cost of home sales in the period in which the related home sales revenue is recognized.
We maintain general liability insurance designed to protect us against a portion of our risk of loss from construction-related claims. We also generally require our subcontractors and design professionals to indemnify us for liabilities arising from their work, subject to various limitations. However, such indemnity is significantly limited with respect to certain subcontractors that are added to our general liability insurance policy. Included in our warranty reserve accrual are allowances to cover our estimated costs of self-insured retentions and deductible amounts under these policies and estimated costs for claims that may not be covered by applicable insurance or indemnities. Estimation of these accruals include consideration of our claims history, including current claims and estimates of claims incurred but not yet reported. In addition, we record expected recoveries from insurance carriers when proceeds are probable and estimable. Outstanding warranty insurance receivables were $10.5 million and $10.0 million as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Warranty insurance receivables are recorded in receivables on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
There can be no assurance that the terms and limitations of the limited warranty will be effective against claims made by homebuyers, that we will be able to renew our insurance coverage or renew it at reasonable rates, that we will not be liable for damages, cost of repairs, and/or the expense of litigation surrounding possible construction defects, soil subsidence or building related claims or that claims will not arise out of uninsurable events or circumstances not covered by insurance and not subject to effective indemnification agreements with certain subcontractors.
- 21 -
Warranty reserves consisted of the following (in thousands):
Warranty reserves, beginning of period
35,375
24,324
24,449
Warranty reserves accrued
4,201
3,691
10,427
7,455
Liabilities assumed in the Merger
7,481
(14
(809
1,286
209
Warranty expenditures
(2,819
(2,596
(8,240
(7,503
Warranty reserves, end of period
32,091
Performance Bonds
We obtain surety bonds in the normal course of business to ensure completion of certain infrastructure improvements of our projects. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company had outstanding surety bonds totaling $422.3 million and $355.2 million, respectively. The beneficiaries of the bonds are various municipalities.
16.
Stock-Based Compensation
2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan
The Company’s stock compensation plan, the 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2013 Incentive Plan”), was adopted by TRI Pointe in January 2013 and amended with the approval of our stockholders in 2014. The 2013 Incentive Plan provides for the grant of equity-based awards, including options to purchase shares of common stock, stock appreciation rights, common stock, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance awards. The 2013 Incentive Plan will automatically expire on the tenth anniversary of its effective date. Our board of directors may terminate or amend the 2013 Incentive Plan at any time, subject to any requirement of stockholder approval required by applicable law, rule or regulation.
As amended, the number of shares of our common stock that may be issued under the 2013 Incentive Plan is 11,727,833 shares. To the extent that shares of our common stock subject to an outstanding option, stock appreciation right, stock award or performance award granted under the 2013 Incentive Plan are not issued or delivered by reason of the expiration, termination, cancellation or forfeiture of such award or the settlement of such award in cash, then such shares of our common stock generally shall again be available under the 2013 Incentive Plan. As of September 30, 2015 there were 9,563,491 shares available for future grant under the 2013 Incentive Plan.
Converted Awards
Under the Transaction Agreement, each outstanding Weyerhaeuser equity award held by an employee of WRECO was converted into a similar equity award with TRI Pointe, based on the final exchange ratio of 2.1107 (the “Exchange Ratio”), rounded down to the nearest whole number of shares of common stock. The Company filed a registration statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-197461) on July 16, 2014 to register 4,105,953 shares related to these equity awards. The converted awards have the same terms and conditions as the Weyerhaeuser equity awards except that all performance share units were surrendered in exchange for time-vesting restricted stock units without any performance-based vesting conditions or requirements and the exercise price of each converted stock option is equal to the original exercise price divided by the Exchange Ratio. There will be no future grants under the WRECO equity incentive plans. Refer to Note 2, Merger with Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company, for additional information on the Merger.
The following table presents compensation expense recognized related to all stock-based awards (in thousands):
Total stock-based compensation
2,994
3,547
6,250
As of September 30, 2015, total unrecognized stock-based compensation related to all stock-based awards was $19.2 million and the weighted average term over which the expense was expected to be recognized was 1.90 years.
- 22 -
Summary of Stock Option Activity
The following table presents a summary of stock option awards for the nine months ended September 30, 2015:
Weighted
Average
Aggregate
Exercise
Intrinsic
Contractual
Value
Options
Per Share
Life
Options outstanding at December 31, 2014
3,467,086
13.05
6.0
7,642
Granted
Exercised
(171,716
11.54
Forfeited
(65,356
14.00
Options outstanding at September 30, 2015
3,230,014
13.12
5.2
Options exercisable at September 30, 2015
2,791,472
12.42
4.7
1,884
Summary of Restricted Stock Unit Activity
The following table presents a summary of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) for the nine months ended September 30, 2015:
Restricted
Grant Date
Units
Nonvested RSUs at December 31, 2014
900,547
15.62
13,461
1,580,499
11.59
18,315
Vested
(453,685
13.85
(66,918
14.56
Nonvested RSUs at September 30, 2015
1,960,443
12.21
25,662
On March 5, 2015, the Company granted an aggregate of 440,800 restricted stock units to employees and officers. The restricted stock units granted vest annually on the anniversary of the grant date over a three year period. The fair value of each restricted stock award granted on March 5, 2015 was measured using a price of $14.97 per share, which was the closing stock price on the date of grant. Each award will be expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
On March 9, 2015, the Company granted 411,804, 384,351, and 274,536 performance-based RSUs to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, with 1/3 of the performance-based RSU amounts being allocated to each of the three following separate performance goals: total shareholder return (compared to a group of similarly sized homebuilders); earnings per share; and stock price. The performance-based restricted stock units granted will vest in each case, if at all, based on the percentage of attainment of the applicable performance goal. The performance periods for the performance-based RSUs with vesting based on total shareholder return and earnings per share are January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017. The performance period for the performance-based RSUs with vesting based on stock price is January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017. The fair value of the performance-based RSUs related to the total shareholder return and stock price performance goals was determined to be $7.55 and $7.90 per share, respectively, based on a Monte Carlo simulation. The fair value of the performance-based RSUs related to the earnings per share goal was measured using a price of $14.57 per share, which was the closing stock price on the date of grant. Each grant will be expensed on a straight-line basis over the expected vesting period.
On August 12, 2015, the Company granted an aggregate of 69,008 restricted stock units to members of its board of directors. The restricted stock units granted to directors on August 12, 2015 vest in their entirety on the day immediately prior to the Company’s 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The fair value of each restricted stock award granted on August 12, 2015 was measured using $14.49 per share, which was the closing price on the date of grant. Each award will be expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
As restricted stock units vest, a portion of the shares awarded is generally withheld to cover employee taxes. As a result, the number of restricted stock units vested and the number of shares of TRI Pointe common stock issued will differ.
- 23 -
17.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”), which requires an asset and liability approach for measuring deferred taxes based on temporary differences between the financial statements and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates for the years in which taxes are expected to be paid or recovered. Each quarter we assess our deferred tax asset to determine whether all or any portion of the asset is more likely than not unrealizable under ASC 740. We are required to establish a valuation allowance for any portion of the asset we conclude is more likely than not to be unrealizable. Our assessment considers, among other things, the nature, frequency and severity of our current and cumulative losses, forecasts of our future taxable income, the duration of statutory carryforward periods and tax planning alternatives.
We had net deferred tax assets of $141.5 million and $157.8 million as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. We had a valuation allowance related to those net deferred tax assets of $4.3 million and $6.2 million as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. The Company will continue to evaluate both positive and negative evidence in determining the need for a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets. Changes in positive and negative evidence, including differences between the Company's future operating results and the estimates utilized in the determination of the valuation allowance, could result in changes in the Company's estimate of the valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets. The accounting for deferred taxes is based upon estimates of future results. Differences between the anticipated and actual outcomes of these future results could have a material impact on the Company's consolidated results of operations or financial position. Also, changes in existing federal and state tax laws and tax rates could affect future tax results and the valuation allowance against the Company's deferred tax assets.
Our provision for income taxes totaled $28.0 million and $6.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Our provision for income taxes totaled $66.1 million and $16.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The Company classifies any interest and penalties related to income taxes assessed by jurisdiction as part of income tax expense. The Company had $16.6 million and $13.8 million of liabilities for uncertain tax positions recorded as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. The Company has not been assessed interest or penalties by any major tax jurisdictions related to prior years.
18.
Related Party Transactions
Prior to the Merger, WRECO was a wholly owned subsidiary of Weyerhaeuser. Weyerhaeuser provided certain services including payroll processing and related employee benefits, other corporate services such as corporate governance, cash management and other treasury services, administrative services such as government relations, tax, internal audit, legal, accounting, human resources and equity-based compensation plan administration, lease of office space, aviation services and insurance coverage. WRECO was allocated a portion of Weyerhaeuser corporate general and administrative costs on either a proportional cost or usage basis.
Weyerhaeuser-allocated corporate general and administrative expenses were as follows (in thousands):
Weyerhaeuser-allocated costs
10,735
These expenses are not indicative of the actual level of expense WRECO would have incurred if it had operated as an independent company or of expenses expected to be incurred in the future after the Closing Date.
TRI Pointe has certain liabilities with Weyerhaeuser related to a tax sharing agreement. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had an income tax liability to Weyerhaeuser of $8.6 million and $15.7 million, respectively, which is recorded in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the accompanying balance sheet.
In January of 2015, TRI Pointe acquired 46 lots located in Castle Rock, Colorado, for a purchase price of approximately $2.8 million from an entity managed by an affiliate of the Starwood Capital Group. The chairman of the Company’s board of directors is Barry Sternlicht who is also the chairman of the Starwood Capital Group. This acquisition was approved by TRI Pointe independent directors.
- 24 -
19.
Supplemental Disclosure to Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow
The following are supplemental disclosures to the consolidated statements of cash flows (in thousands):
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest, net of amounts capitalized
1,372
Income taxes
44,394
14,962
Supplemental disclosures of noncash activities:
Increase in real estate inventory due to distribution of land
from an unconsolidated joint venture
5,132
Distribution to Weyerhaeuser of excluded assets and
liabilities
125,019
Amounts owed to Weyerhaeuser related to the tax sharing
agreement
15,688
Noncash settlement of debt payable to Weyerhaeuser
70,082
Accrued liabilities related to the purchase of operating
properties and equipment
1,877
Amortization of senior note discount
1,155
Effect of net consolidation and de-consolidation of
variable interest entities:
(Decrease) increase in consolidated real estate
inventory not owned
(3,556
4,497
Increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities
Decrease (increase) in noncontrolling interests
3,256
(4,497
20.
Supplemental Guarantor Information
On the Closing Date, the TRI Pointe Homes assumed WRECO’s obligations as issuer of the Senior Notes. Additionally, all of TRI Pointe’s wholly owned subsidiaries that are guarantors of the Company’s unsecured $550 million revolving credit facility, including WRECO and certain of its wholly owned subsidiaries, entered into supplemental indentures pursuant to which they jointly and severally guaranteed TRI Pointe’s obligations with respect to the Senior Notes. In connection with the Reorganization, TRI Pointe Group became a co-issuer with TRI Pointe Homes of the Senior Notes.
Presented below are the condensed consolidating balance sheets at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, condensed consolidating statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 and condensed consolidating statement of cash flows for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014. TRI Pointe’s non-guarantor subsidiaries represent less than 3% on an individual and aggregate basis of consolidated total assets, total revenues, and income from operations before taxes and cash flow from operating activities. Therefore, the non-guarantor subsidiaries’ information is not separately presented in the tables below, but included with the guarantor subsidiaries.
As discussed in Note 1, the Merger was treated as a “reverse acquisition” with WRECO being considered the accounting acquirer. Accordingly, the financial statements reflect the historical results of WRECO for all periods and do not include the historical financial information of TRI Pointe prior to the Closing Date. Subsequent to the Closing Date, the consolidated financial statements reflect the results of the combined company.
- 25 -
Supplemental Guarantor Information (continued)
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet (in thousands):
Guarantor
Consolidating
TRI Pointe
Issuer (1)
Subsidiaries
Adjustments
Group, Inc.
37,015
59,978
11,225
21,696
Intercompany receivables
872,290
(872,290
675,914
1,900,488
Investments in subsidiaries
1,045,130
(1,045,130
23,630
117,849
76,629
7,887
Total Assets
2,903,995
2,125,238
(1,917,420
14,821
52,926
Intercompany payables
67,777
142,930
7,172
400
Total Liabilities
1,327,819
1,068,546
Total Equity
1,056,692
Total Liabilities and Equity
References to “Issuer” in Note 20, Supplemental Guarantor Information have the following meanings:
a.
for periods prior to July 7, 2015: TRI Pointe Homes only
b.
for periods from and after July 7, 2015: TRI Pointe Homes and TRI Pointe Group as co-issuers
- 26 -
Homes, Inc.
105,888
64,741
5,050
15,068
797,480
(797,480
613,665
1,666,518
156,603
5,960
941,397
(941,397
134,191
55,199
50,206
2,698,912
1,953,489
(1,738,877
25,800
43,060
57,353
152,656
14,077
600
1,244,732
993,796
959,693
- 27 -
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations (in thousands):
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015
224,244
418,108
423,897
182,754
324,789
7,286
22,752
12,942
13,841
2,093
202,899
367,496
21,345
56,401
Other income, net
(37
21,308
56,482
(9,070
(18,951
Equity of net income of subsidiaries
37,924
(37,924
37,531
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
- 28 -
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014
123,456
348,345
(11
580
354,475
108,687
276,713
3,956
24,437
7,246
13,705
119,889
324,752
3,556
29,723
(6,381
(10,329
9
490
(Loss) income before taxes
(2,816
19,802
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
2,032
(8,053
11,749
(11,749
- 29 -
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
461,654
982,201
1,059,262
376,100
773,091
17,714
61,244
38,874
44,387
(169
2,899
432,519
900,669
29,135
158,593
Other (loss) income, net
(149
421
28,986
158,930
(12,285
(53,803
103,688
(103,688
105,127
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
- 30 -
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
899,856
8,865
945,170
710,690
69,140
49,894
871,926
73,244
(10,835
(251
61,939
(18,384
43,555
(43,555
- 31 -
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows (in thousands):
(69,362
(70,649
(382
(677
Intercompany
(78,354
78,354
Net cash used in investing activities
(78,736
(1,816
(57,513
(200
Net proceeds (repayments) of debt held by variable interest
entities
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under share-based
awards
Minimum tax withholding paid on behalf of employees for
restricted stock units
79,225
67,702
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(68,873
(4,763
- 32 -
(26,882
(113,547
(659
(5,409
(850,977
850,977
(797,836
(5,960
Changes in debt payable to Weyerhaeuser
Change in book overdrafts
913,695
173,703
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
88,977
54,196
58,706
- 33 -
CAUTIONARY NOTE CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain statements relating to future events of our intentions, beliefs, expectations, predictions for the future and other matters that are “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
These statements:
use forward-looking terminology;
are based on various assumptions made by TRI Pointe; and
may not prove to be accurate because of risks and uncertainties surrounding the assumptions that are made.
Factors listed in this section – as well as other factors not included – may cause actual results to differ significantly from the forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. There is no guarantee that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q will occur, or if any of the events occurs, there is no guarantee of what effect it will have on our operations or financial condition.
We will not update the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, unless otherwise required by law.
Forward-Looking Statements
These forward-looking statements are generally accompanied by words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “goal,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “will,” “would,” or other words that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes, including, without limitation, our transaction with Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company (WRECO). These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding expected benefits of the WRECO transaction, integration plans and expected synergies therefrom, and our anticipated future financial and operating performance and results, including our estimates for growth.
Forward-looking statements are based on a number of factors, including the expected effect of:
the economy;
laws and regulations;
adverse litigation outcome and the adequacy of reserves;
changes in accounting principles;
projected benefit payments; and
projected tax rates and credits.
Risks, Uncertainties and Assumptions
The major risks and uncertainties – and assumptions that are made – that affect our business and may cause actual results to differ from these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
the effect of general economic conditions, including employment rates, housing starts, interest rate levels, availability of financing for home mortgages and strength of the U.S. dollar;
market demand for our products, which is related to the strength of the various U.S. business segments and U.S. and international economic conditions;
levels of competition;
the successful execution of our internal performance plans, including restructuring and cost reduction initiatives;
global economic conditions;
raw material prices;
- 34 -
energy prices;
the effect of weather, including the continuing drought in California;
the risk of loss from earthquakes, volcanoes, fires, floods, droughts, windstorms, hurricanes, pest infestations and other natural disasters;
transportation costs;
federal and state tax policies;
the effect of land use, environment and other governmental regulations;
legal proceedings;
risks relating to any unforeseen changes to or effects on liabilities, future capital expenditures, revenues, expenses, earnings, synergies, indebtedness, financial condition, losses and future prospects;
the risk that disruptions from the transaction with WRECO will harm our business;
our ability to achieve the benefits of the transaction with WRECO in the estimated amount and the anticipated timeframe, if at all;
our ability to integrate WRECO successfully and to achieve the anticipated synergies therefrom;
change in accounting principles;
risks related to unauthorized access to our computer systems, theft of our customers’ confidential information or other forms of cyber-attack; and
other factors described in “Risk Factors.”
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related condensed notes thereto contained elsewhere in this report. The information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is not a complete description of our business or the risks associated with an investment in our securities. We urge you to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report and in our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2015, and subsequent reports on Form 8-K, which discuss our business in greater detail. The section entitled “Risk Factors” set forth in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, and similar disclosures in our other SEC filings, discuss some of the important risk factors that may affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. You should carefully consider those risks, in addition to the information in this report and in our other filings with the SEC, before deciding to invest in, or maintain your investment in, our common stock.
Reverse Acquisition and Formation of TRI Pointe Group, Inc.
On July 7, 2014 (the “Closing Date”), TRI Pointe Homes, Inc. consummated the previously announced merger (the “Merger”) of our wholly owned subsidiary, Topaz Acquisition, Inc. (“Merger Sub”), with and into WRECO, with WRECO surviving the Merger and becoming our wholly owned subsidiary, as contemplated by the Transaction Agreement, dated as of November 3, 2013 (the “Transaction Agreement”), by and among us, Weyerhaeuser Company (“Weyerhaeuser”), the Company, WRECO and Merger Sub. The Merger is accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”). For accounting purposes, the Merger is treated as a “reverse acquisition” and WRECO is considered the accounting acquirer. Accordingly, WRECO is reflected as the predecessor and acquirer and therefore the accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect the historical consolidated financial statements of WRECO for all periods presented and do not include the historical financial statements of TRI Pointe prior to the Closing Date. Subsequent to the Closing Date, the consolidated financial statements reflect the results of the combined company.
For further information on the Merger, see Note 2, Merger with Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company, of the condensed notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q. In the Merger, each issued and outstanding WRECO common share was converted into 1.297 shares of TRI Pointe common stock. The historical issued and outstanding WRECO common shares (100,000,000 common shares for all periods presented prior to the Merger) have been recast as 129,700,000 common shares of the Company for all periods prior to the Merger) in all periods presented to reflect this conversion.
On July 7, 2015, TRI Pointe Homes, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“TRI Pointe Homes”), reorganized its corporate structure (the “Reorganization”) whereby TRI Pointe Homes became a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of TRI Pointe Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“TRI Pointe Group”). Please see "Note Regarding this Quarterly Report" above regarding the reorganization of our corporate structure on July 7, 2015.
- 35 -
Consolidated Financial Data (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Other income (expense), net
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2014
Net New Home Orders, Average Selling Communities and Monthly Absorption Rates by Segment
Percentage Change
Net New
Monthly
Home
Selling
Absorption
Orders
Communities
Rates
150
17.2
2.9
88
17.3
1.7
71
%
(1
)%
291
25.0
3.9
264
21.3
4.1
10
17
(6
87
11.8
2.5
82
12.3
2.2
(4
11
125
127
24.8
(2
1
234
28.3
2.8
152
16.0
3.2
77
(13
13.5
2.7
90
15.3
2.0
21
(12
37
996
120.8
803
107.0
24
13
Net new home orders for the three months ended September 30, 2015 increased by 193 units or 24% to 996, compared to 803 during the prior year period. The overall increase in net new home orders was due to a 13% increase in average selling communities and a 10% increase in absorption rates. Net new home orders increased at all but one of our reporting segments, highlighted by a 71% increase at our Maracay Homes segment which was driven by a 71% increase in our absorption rate and a 54% increase at TRI Pointe Homes primarily due to a 77% increase in average selling communities. Trendmaker Homes reported a slight decline in net new home orders compared to the prior year period resulting from a slowdown in the premium housing market in Houston as a result of uncertainty around oil prices.
- 36 -
Backlog Units, Dollar Value and Average Sales Price by Segment (dollars in thousands)
As of September 30, 2015
As of September 30, 2014
Backlog
Dollar
Sales
293
118,164
403
143
57,202
105
107
448
296,477
662
415
222,929
537
8
33
23
169
79,955
473
163
78,317
480
205
108,250
528
254
131,611
518
(19
(18
567
388,336
685
282
240,872
854
101
61
(20
174
118,685
682
183
139,434
762
(5
(15
(10
1,856
1,109,867
598
1,440
870,365
604
28
Backlog units reflects the number of homes, net of actual cancellations experienced during the period, for which we have entered into sales contracts with customers but for which we have not yet delivered the homes. Homes in backlog are generally delivered within three to nine months, although we may experience cancellations of sales contracts prior to delivery. Our cancellation rate of buyers who contracted to buy a home but did not close escrow (as a percentage of overall orders) was 16% for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to 18% for the same prior year period. The dollar value of backlog was $1.1 billion as of September 30, 2015, an increase of $239.5 million, or 28%, compared to $870.4 million as of September 30, 2014. This increase in dollar value of backlog is due to a 29% increase in the number of homes in backlog to 1,856 homes as of September 30, 2015 from 1,440 homes as of September 30, 2014. The increase was slightly offset by a decrease in the average sales price of homes in backlog of $6,000, or 1%, to $598,000 as of September 30, 2015 compared to $604,000 as of September 30, 2014. The increase of 416 homes in backlog was driven by TRI Pointe Homes and Maracay Homes with increases of 285 units and 150 units, respectively, as of September 30, 2015 compared to the same prior year period.
New Homes Delivered, Homes Sales Revenue and Average Sales Price by Segment (dollars in thousands)
New
Homes
Delivered
Revenue
131
50,504
386
94
397
39
35
314
170,450
543
277
129,608
468
32
117
47,560
406
74
32,338
437
58
(7
80,732
495
135
298
224,243
752
158
781
89
115
68,863
599
104
79,387
763
(22
1,138
564
842
560
36
Home sales revenue increased $170.6 million, or 36%, to $642.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 from $471.8 million for the prior year period. The increase was comprised of: (i) $165.9 million related to a 35% increase in homes delivered to 1,138 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 from 842 in the prior year period; and (ii) $4.7 million due to an increase in average sales price of $4,000 per home to $564,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 from $560,000 in the prior year period.
- 37 -
Homebuilding Gross Margins (dollars in thousands)
100.0
79.0
81.7
Homebuilding gross margin
134,809
21.0
86,401
18.3
Add: interest in cost of home sales
13,189
2.1
7,702
1.6
Add: impairments and lot option
abandonments
366
0.1
Adjusted homebuilding gross margin(1)
148,364
23.1
94,593
20.0
Homebuilding gross margin percentage
Adjusted homebuilding gross margin percentage(1)
Non-GAAP financial measure (as discussed below).
Our homebuilding gross margin percentage increased to 21.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to 18.3% for the prior year period. The prior year margin was impacted by a $13.0 million or 280 basis point noncash purchase accounting adjustment related to the fair value increase to TRI Pointe’s inventory as a result of the Merger. Excluding interest and impairment and lot option abandonments in cost of home sales, adjusted homebuilding gross margin percentage was 23.1% for the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to 20.0% for the prior year period. The increase in the adjusted homebuilding gross margin was consistent with the change in homebuilding gross margin.
Adjusted homebuilding gross margin is a non-GAAP financial measure. We believe this information is meaningful as it isolates the impact that leverage and noncash charges have on homebuilding gross margin and permits investors to make better comparisons with our competitors, who adjust gross margins in a similar fashion. Because adjusted homebuilding gross margin is not calculated in accordance with GAAP, it may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. See the table above reconciling this non-GAAP financial measure to homebuilding gross margin, the nearest GAAP equivalent.
Land and Lot Gross Margins (dollars in thousands)
70.8
41.7
Land and lot gross margin
1,425
29.2
3,233
58.3
Land and lot gross margin percentage decreased to 29.2% for the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to 58.3% for the prior year period. Land and lot sales gross margin percentage can vary significantly due to the type of land and its related cost basis.
Sales and Marketing, General and Administrative Expense (dollars in thousands)
As a Percentage of
Home Sales Revenue
General and administrative (G&A)
4.2
4.4
Total sales and marketing and G&A
56,821
49,344
8.8
10.5
- 38 -
Sales and marketing expense as a percentage of home sales revenue decreased to 4.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2015 from 6.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2014. This decrease is primarily attributable to greater leverage achieved as a result of a 36% increase in home sales revenue to $642.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $471.8 million in the same prior year period. Sales and marketing expense as a percentage of home sales revenue decreased at all six operating segments in the current year period. Total sales and marketing expense increased by $1.6 million to $30.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $28.4 million in the same prior year period, and is primarily attributable to direct selling costs related to the 35% increase in new home deliveries.
General and administrative expenses as a percentage of home sales revenue decreased to 4.2% of home sales revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to 4.4% for the prior year period. The decrease is due primarily to higher operating leverage resulting from increased home sales revenue. General and administrative expenses increased $5.8 million to $26.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $21.0 million in the same prior year period. This increase is due primarily to employee related costs to support our long term growth.
Total sales and marketing and G&A (“SG&A”) as a percentage of home sales revenue decreased to 8.8% for the three month period ended September 30, 2015 compared to 10.5% in the prior year period, due primarily to higher home sales revenue in the current year period. Total SG&A expense increased $7.4 million, or 15.0%, to $56.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 from $49.4 million in the prior year period.
Restructuring Charges
Restructuring charges decreased to $2.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $7.0 million in the same period in the prior year. The decrease was mainly due to higher employee-related restructuring costs in 2014, largely related to retention, severance and related costs in connection with the Merger.
Interest
Interest, which was incurred principally to finance land acquisitions, land development and home construction, totaled $15.5 million and $15.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The capitalized portion of interest incurred was $15.5 million and $14.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The increase in interest incurred during the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the prior year period was primarily attributable to an increase in our outstanding unsecured revolving credit facility debt incurred to fund the overall growth of the Company.
Income Tax
For the three months ended September 30, 2015, we recorded a tax provision of $28.0 million based on an effective tax rate of 36.0%. For the three months ended September 30, 2014, we recorded a tax provision of $6.0 million based on an effective tax rate of 35.4%. The increase in provision for income taxes is due to an increase in income before taxes of $60.8 million to $77.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $17.0 million for the prior year period.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
313
16.4
50
954
22.8
4.6
793
20.3
4.3
20
12
353
10.8
3.6
286
12.8
(16
46
381
26.0
436
23.5
(21
935
27.0
3.8
6.4
2.6
515
322
310
253
19.1
1.5
(29
73
3,428
117.4
2,233
98.5
19
- 39 -
Net new home orders for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 increased 54% to 3,428, compared to 2,233 during the prior year period. The overall increase in net new home orders was due to a 29% increase in absorption rates and a 19% increase in average selling communities. Net new home orders increased at all but one of our reporting segments, highlighted by the addition of TRI Pointe Homes for the full nine month period ended September 30, 2015 resulting in 935 net new home orders compared to 152 in the prior year period and a 58% increase net new home orders at Maracay Homes, primarily driven by a 50% increase in absorption. Trendmaker Homes in Houston reported a 13% decline in net new home orders compared to the prior year period resulting from a slowdown in the premium housing market in Houston as a result of uncertainty around oil prices.
307
116,555
380
376
724
366,339
506
658
315,910
297
126,585
426
88,607
405
43
394
201,592
512
404
492
611
756
287
274
271
171,130
631
188,896
747
(9
2,604
554
1,978
517
41
Home sales revenue increased $420.5 million, or 41%, to $1.4 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 from $1.0 billion for the prior year period. The increase was comprised of: (i) $323.9 million due to a 32% increase in homes delivered to 2,604 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 from 1,978 in the same prior year period; and (ii) $96.6 million due to a 7% increase in average sales price of $37,000 per home to $554,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 from $517,000 in the prior year period. The increase in new home deliveries was primarily attributable to the addition of TRI Pointe Homes with no comparable amounts in the prior year period before the Merger in addition to a 36% increase at Quadrant Homes. The average sales price of homes delivered increased at all but two of our reporting segments due to a change in product mix. The average sales price at Winchester declined 15% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the same prior year period primarily due to a change in mix to more attached product.
79.6
80.1
294,664
20.4
203,935
19.9
27,540
1.9
1,593
897
323,797
22.4
221,174
21.6
Our homebuilding gross margin percentage increased to 20.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to 19.9% for the prior year period. The prior year margin was impacted by a $13.0 million or 130 basis point noncash purchase accounting adjustment related to the fair value increase to TRI Pointe’s inventory as a result of the Merger. Excluding interest and impairment and lot option abandonments in cost of home sales, adjusted homebuilding gross margin percentage was 22.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, compared to 21.6% for the prior year period. The increase in the adjusted homebuilding gross margin was consistent with the change in homebuilding gross margin described above.
- 40 -
23.3
83.0
57,042
76.7
6,204
17.0
Our land and lot gross margin percentage increased to 76.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to 17.0% for the same prior year period. The increase in land and lot sales revenue and gross margin percentage were mainly due to the sale of a 15.72 acre employment center located in the Pacific Highlands Ranch community in the San Diego, California division of our Pardee Homes reporting segment. The sale was completed in June of 2015 for $53 million in cash. The transaction included significant gross margins due to the low land basis of the Pacific Highlands Ranch community which was acquired in 1981.
5.5
7.1
5.8
5.6
162,219
130,236
11.2
12.7
Sales and marketing expense decreased to 5.5% of home sales revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 from 7.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 mainly due to a strong sales absorption pace driving higher deliveries and higher average sales prices for homes delivered during the period. Total sales and marketing expense increased by $5.9 million to $79.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $73.1 million in the same prior year period and is primarily attributable to the addition of TRI Pointe Homes with no comparable amounts in the prior year before the Merger and direct selling costs associated with the 32% increase in new home deliveries.
General and administrative expense increased by $26.2 million to $83.3 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2015 from $57.1 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2014. General and administrative expenses were 5.8% of home sales revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to 5.6% of home sales revenue for the same period in the prior year. The increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily related to the addition of TRI Pointe Homes with no comparable amounts in the prior year before the Merger.
Total SG&A expense increased $32.0 million, or 24.6%, to $162.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 from $130.2 million in the prior year period due primarily to the addition of TRI Pointe Homes in the current year as discussed above, but improved to 11.2% of home sales revenue from 12.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Restructuring charges decreased to $2.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $9.2 million in the same period in the prior year. The decrease was mainly due to higher employee-related restructuring costs in 2014 related to retention, severance and related costs in connection with the Merger.
- 41 -
Interest, which was incurred principally to finance land acquisitions, land development and home construction, totaled $45.8 million and $25.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The capitalized portion of interest incurred was $45.8 million and $23.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The increase in interest incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the prior year period was primarily attributable to an increase in our outstanding debt and higher interest rates as a result of the issuance of the Senior Notes in connection with the Merger.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we recorded a tax provision of $66.1 million based on an effective tax rate of 35.2%. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, we recorded a tax provision of $16.4 million based on an effective tax rate of 27.7%. The increase in provision for income taxes is due to an increase in income before taxes of $128.8 million to $187.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $59.1 million for the prior year period. The increase in our effective rate was due to a non-recurring tax benefit recorded during the second quarter 2014 related the establishment of a $5.8 million deferred tax asset for a tax over book basis asset sale. This non-recurring tax benefit reduced our effective rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 by 9.8%. Without the non-recurring tax benefit our effective rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 would have been 37.5% which is comparable to our effective rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.
Lots Owned or Controlled by Segment
Excluded from owned and controlled lots are those related to Note 8, Investments in Unconsolidated Entities. The table below summarizes our lots owned or controlled by segment as of the dates presented:
Increase
(Decrease)
Lots Owned
1,582
1,275
16,835
17,657
1,087
1,055
1,158
757
401
2,644
2,762
(118
2,178
2,382
(204
25,484
25,888
(404
Lots Controlled(1)
216
477
(261
(55
240
440
(45
335
427
(92
818
1,311
(493
(38
749
1,016
(267
(26
398
(154
(28
2,756
4,223
(1,467
(35
Total Lots Owned or Controlled(1)
28,240
30,111
(1,871
As of September 30, 2015 and 2014, lots controlled included lots that were under land option contracts or purchase contracts.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
Our principal uses of capital for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 were operating expenses, land purchases, land development and home construction. We used funds generated by our operations and available borrowings to meet our short-term working capital requirements. We remain focused on generating positive margins in our homebuilding operations and acquiring desirable land positions in order to maintain a strong balance sheet and keep us poised for growth. As of September 30, 2015, we had $97.0 million of cash and cash equivalents. We believe we have sufficient cash and sources of financing to fund operations for at least the next twelve months.
- 42 -
Our board of directors will consider a number of factors when evaluating our level of indebtedness and when making decisions regarding the incurrence of new indebtedness, including the purchase price of assets to be acquired with debt financing, the estimated market value of our assets and the ability of particular assets, and our company as a whole, to generate cash flow to cover the expected debt service. Our charter does not contain a limitation on the amount of debt we may incur and our board of directors may change our target debt levels at any time without the approval of our stockholders.
On the Closing Date, TRI Pointe assumed WRECO’s obligations as issuer of $450 million aggregate principal amount of its 4.375% Senior Notes due 2019 (“2019 Notes”) and $450 million aggregate principal amount of its 5.875% Senior Notes due 2024 (“2024 Notes” and together with the 2019 Notes, the “Senior Notes”). The 2019 Notes were issued at 98.89% of their aggregate principal amount and the 2024 Notes were issued at 98.15% of their aggregate principal amount. The net proceeds of $861.3 million, after debt issuance costs and discounts, from the offering were deposited into two separate escrow accounts following the closing of the offering on June 13, 2014. Upon release of the escrowed funds on the Closing Date, and prior to the consummation of the Merger, WRECO paid $743.7 million in cash to the former direct parent entity of WRECO, which cash was retained by Weyerhaeuser and its subsidiaries (other than WRECO and its subsidiaries). The payment consisted of the $739 million Payment Amount (as defined in the Transaction Agreement) as well as $4.7 million in payment of all unpaid interest on the debt payable to Weyerhaeuser that accrued from November 3, 2013 to the Closing Date. The remaining $117.6 million of proceeds was retained by TRI Pointe and used for general corporate purposes.
The 2019 Notes and 2024 Notes mature on June 15, 2019 and June 15, 2024, respectively. Interest is payable semiannually in arrears on June 15 and December 15. As of September 30, 2015, no principal has been paid on the Senior Notes, and there was $21.2 million of capitalized debt financing costs related to the Senior Notes, included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheet. These costs will amortize over the respective lives of the Senior Notes.
In May 2015, the Company amended its unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) from $425 million to $550 million. The Credit Facility matures on May 18, 2019, and contains a sublimit of $75 million for letters of credit. The Company may borrow under the Credit Facility in the ordinary course of business to fund its operations, including its land development and homebuilding activities. Borrowings under the Credit Facility will be governed by, among other things, a borrowing base. The Credit Facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including financial covenants relating to consolidated tangible net worth, leverage, and liquidity or interest coverage. Interest rates on borrowings will be based on either a daily Eurocurrency base rate or a Eurocurrency rate, in either case, plus a spread ranging from 1.45% to 2.20% depending on the Company’s leverage ratio.
As of September 30, 2015, the outstanding balance under the Credit Facility was $349.4 million with an interest rate 2.16% per annum and $192.4 million of availability after considering the borrowing base provisions and outstanding letters of credit. At September 30, 2015 we had outstanding letters of credit of $8.2 million. These letters of credit were issued to secure various financial obligations. We believe it is not probable that any outstanding letters of credit will be drawn upon.
Seller Financed Loan
As of September 30, 2015, the Company had $7.6 million outstanding related to seller financed loans to acquire lots for the construction of homes. Principal and interest payments on these loans are due at various maturity dates, including at the time individual homes associated with the acquired land are delivered. As of September 30, 2015, the seller financed loans will accrue interest at a weighted average rate of 6.95% per annum, with interest calculated on a daily basis. Any remaining unpaid balance on these loans is due in May 2016.
- 43 -
Covenant Compliance
Under our Credit Facility, we are required to comply with certain financial covenants, including, but not limited to, those set forth in the table below (dollars in thousands):
Covenant
Actual at
Requirement at
Financial Covenants
Consolidated Tangible Net Worth
1,414,014
928,431
(Not less than $875.9 million plus 50% of net
income and 50% of the net proceeds from equity
offerings after March 31, 2015)
Leverage Test
45
<55
(Not to exceed 55%)
Interest Coverage Test
5.3
>1.5
(Not less than 1.5:1.0)
As of September 30, 2015, we were in compliance with all of these financial covenants.
Leverage Ratios
We believe that our leverage ratios provide useful information to the users of our financial statements regarding our financial position and cash and debt management. The ratio of debt-to-capital and the ratio of net debt-to-capital are calculated as follows (dollars in thousands):
Total debt
1,245,621
1,162,179
Stockholders’ equity
Total capital
2,821,797
2,616,359
Ratio of debt-to-capital(1)
44.1
44.4
Less: Cash and cash equivalents
(96,993
(170,629
Net debt
1,148,628
991,550
2,724,804
2,445,730
Ratio of net debt-to-capital(2)
42.2
40.5
The ratio of debt-to-capital is computed as the quotient obtained by dividing debt by the sum of total debt plus equity.
The ratio of net debt-to-capital is a non-GAAP measure and is computed as the quotient obtained by dividing net debt (which is debt less cash and cash equivalents) by the sum of net debt plus equity. The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is the ratio of debt-to-capital. We believe the ratio of net debt-to-capital is a relevant financial measure for investors to understand the leverage employed in our operations and as an indicator of our ability to obtain financing. See the table above reconciling this non-GAAP financial measure to the ratio of debt-to-capital. Because the ratio of net debt-to-capital is not calculated in accordance with GAAP, it may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.
- 44 -
Cash Flows—Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
For the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the comparison of cash flows is as follows:
Net cash used in operating activities decreased by $418,000 to $140.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 from $140.4 million used for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The change was comprised of offsetting activity, including (i) an increase in real estate inventories of $305.9 million in 2015 compared to an increase of $249.9 million in 2014 and (ii) an increase in receivables of $12.8 million in 2015 compared to a decrease of $34.1 million in 2014. Other offsetting activity included changes in other assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and net income.
Net cash used in investing activities was $2.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $47.2 million of cash provided by investing activities for the same prior year period. Cash provided by investing activities for the prior year period was primarily related to $53.8 million of cash acquired in the Merger.
Net cash provided by financing activities decreased to $68.6 million for the nine months ending September 30, 2015 from $236.4 million for the same period in the prior year. The change was primarily a result of prior year activity associated with proceeds from the issuance of senior notes of $886.7 million, offset by payments of debt payable to Weyerhaeuser of $623.6 million and offset by higher current period debt borrowings of $90.0 million.
As of September 30, 2015, our cash and cash equivalents balance was $97.0 million.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
In the ordinary course of business, we enter into land option contracts in order to procure lots for the construction of our homes. We are subject to customary obligations associated with entering into contracts for the purchase of land and improved lots. These purchase contracts typically require a cash deposit and the purchase of properties under these contracts is generally contingent upon satisfaction of certain requirements by the sellers, including obtaining applicable property and development entitlements. We also utilize option contracts with land sellers as a method of acquiring land in staged takedowns, to help us manage the financial and market risk associated with land holdings, and to reduce the use of funds from our corporate financing sources. Option contracts generally require a non-refundable deposit for the right to acquire lots over a specified period of time at pre-determined prices. We generally have the right, at our discretion, to terminate our obligations under both purchase contracts and option contracts by forfeiting our cash deposit with no further financial responsibility to the land seller. As of September 30, 2015, we had $47.0 million of cash deposits, the majority of which are non-refundable, pertaining to land option contracts and purchase contracts with an aggregate remaining purchase price of $345.4 million (net of deposits).
Our utilization of land option contracts is dependent on, among other things, the availability of land sellers willing to enter into option takedown arrangements, the availability of capital to finance the development of optioned lots, general housing market conditions, and local market dynamics. Options may be more difficult to procure from land sellers in strong housing markets and are more prevalent in certain geographic regions.
As of September 30, 2015, we had $192.4 million of availability under our Credit Facility after considering the borrowing base provisions and outstanding letters of credit.
Inflation
Our operations can be adversely impacted by inflation, primarily from higher land, financing, labor, material and construction costs. In addition, inflation can lead to higher mortgage rates, which can significantly affect the affordability of mortgage financing to homebuyers. While we attempt to pass on cost increases to customers through increased prices, when weak housing market conditions exist, we are often unable to offset cost increases with higher selling prices.
Seasonality
Historically, the homebuilding industry experiences seasonal fluctuations in quarterly operating results and capital requirements. We typically experience the highest new home order activity in spring and summer, although this activity is also highly dependent on the number of active selling communities, timing of new community openings and other market factors. Since it typically takes three to nine months to construct a new home, we deliver more homes in the second half of the year as spring and summer home orders convert to home deliveries. Because of this seasonality, home starts, construction costs and related cash outflows have historically been highest in the second and third quarters, and the majority of cash receipts from home deliveries occur during the second half of the year. We expect this seasonal pattern to continue over the long-term, although it may be affected by volatility in the homebuilding industry.
- 45 -
Description of Projects and Communities under Development
The following table presents project information relating to each of our markets as of September 30, 2015 and includes information on current projects under development where we are building and selling homes.
Cumulative
Homes Delivered
Lots
for the Nine
Year of
Delivered as of
Owned as of
Backlog as of
Months Ended
Sales Price
First
Range
County, Project, City
Delivery(1)
Lots(2)
2015(3)
2015(4)(5)
(in thousands)(6)
Phoenix, Arizona
Town of Buckeye:
Verrado Tilden
2012
102
91
18
$239 - $304
Verrado Palisades
63
$305 - $378
Verrado Victory
98
$368 - $375
City of Chandler:
Artesian Ranch
2013
49
25
$338 - $394
Vaquero Ranch
57
$298 - $373
Maracay at Layton Lakes
$470 - $510
Sendera Place
27
$260 - $307
Town of Gilbert:
Arch Crossing at Bridges of Gilbert
67
42
$283 - $341
Trestle Place at Bridges of Gilbert
$344 - $424
Artisan at Morrison Ranch
$285 - $338
Marquis at Morrison Ranch
66
$355 - $424
City of Goodyear:
Calderra at Palm Valley
81
$275 - $352
Los Vientos at Palm Valley
Closed
City of Mesa:
Kinetic Point at Eastmark
80
48
$265 - $345
Lumiere Garden at Eastmark
85
14
15
$314 - $384
Aileron Square at Eastmark
Curie Court at Eastmark
106
Town of Peoria:
The Reserve at Plaza del Rio
162
$205 - $253
Maracay at Northlands
$316 - $397
Meadows - 5500's
$355 - $437
Meadows - 6500's
$417 - $535
Meadows - Oversized
Town of Queen Creek:
Montelena
59
$375 - $447
The Preserve at Hastings Farms
$282 - $367
Villagio
55
$280 - $338
Phoenix, Arizona Total
1,953
819
1,134
261
Tucson, Arizona
Marana:
Tortolita Vistas
$449 - $506
Oro Valley:
Rancho del Cobre
68
$402 - $470
Desert Crest - Center Pointe Vistoso
103
$232 - $285
The Cove - Center Pointe Vistoso
83
$295 - $359
Summit (South) - Center Pointe
Vistoso
$349 - $382
The Pinnacle - Center Pointe Vistoso
70
$395 - $439
Tucson:
Deseo at Sabino Canyon
31
$419 - $505
Ranches at Santa Catalina
$395 - $415
Tucson, Arizona Total
527
79
Maracay Homes Total
2,480
898
- 46 -
County, Project
California
San Diego County:
Alta Del Mar Homes
$1,800 - $2,300
Sorrento Heights Prestige Collection
$890 - $950
Watermark
160
40
$1,200 - $1,310
Canterra
$850 - $920
Casabella
122
119
$920 - $1,000
Verana
78
$990 - $1,140
Pacific Highlands Ranch Future
TBD
963
Olive Hill Estate
$688 - $800
Castlerock
$490 - $730
Meadowood
844
$290 - $600
Sea View Terrace
$308 - $370
Parkview Condos
$400 - $460
Ocean View HillsFuture
1,020
South Otay Mesa
893
$185 - $530
Alta Del Mar Custom Lots
$895 - $1,950
Los Angeles County:
LivingSmart at Fair Oaks Ranch
2011
124
$483 - $509
Golden Valley
498
$499 - $807
Skyline Ranch
1,260
$510 - $640
Ventura County:
LivingSmart at Moorpark Highlands,
Moorpark
133
123
$587 - $650
Riverside County:
Hillside
182
$284 - $301
Meadow Ridge
132
$360 - $460
Amberleaf
$300 - $350
Meadow Glen
142
$340 - $400
Summerfield
30
$290 - $310
Canyon Hills Future
581
Christensen
$338 - $437
LivingSmart Tournament Hills
2010
235
$261 - $334
Lakeside
167
$260 - $282
Tournament Hills Future
268
LivingSmart Sundance
146
$280 - $332
LivingSmart Estrella
$214 - $237
Woodmont
44
$320 - $390
Cielo
92
$240 - $270
Northstar
Skycrest
$311 - $350
Sundance Future
1,603
Banning
4,318
$167 - $250
Sacramento County:
Natomas
120
San Joaquin County:
Bear Creek
1,252
California Total
16,916
1,735
15,153
327
486
Nevada
Clark County:
LivingSmart at Eldorado Ridge
147
$260 - $310
LivingSmart at Eldorado Heights
111
$310 - $392
LivingSmart Sandstone
145
$220 - $250
Ridgeview
$227 - $283
North Peak
$280 - $330
Castle Rock
$350 - $400
Eldorado Future
Horizon Terrace
165
118
$400 - $455
Solano
38
$289 - $320
Alterra
$440 - $505
Bella Verdi
$375 - $440
Milennial
Escala
$545 - $591
POD 5-1 Future
215
Durango Ranch
153
137
$460 - $560
Durango Trail
64
$380 - $410
Meridian
$455 - $530
LivingSmart at Providence
$260 - $323
Encanto
129
$406 - $468
Summerglen
140
$293 - $299
The Canyons at MacDonald Ranch
Nevada Total
2,500
810
1,682
121
238
Pardee Homes Total
19,416
2,545
- 47 -
Washington
Skagit County:
Skagit Highlands, Mt Vernon
2005
423
$251 - $319
Skagit Clearwater Court, Mt Vernon
$299 - $319
Skagit Surplus Pod E, Mt Vernon
Snohomish County:
Kings Corner 1&2, Mill Creek
116
$457 - $510
Filbert Glen, Bothell
$625
King's Corner 3, Mill Creek
$453 - $489
Evergreen Heights, Monroe
$359 - $407
Palm Creek, Bothell
$845 - $905
King County:
Garrison Glen, Kent
$405
Sonata Hill, Auburn
$351 - $399
The Gardens at Eastlake, Sammamish
$816 - $933
Heathers Ridge, Kirkland
$780 - $935
Hedgewood, Redmond
$800 - $920
Grasslawn Estates, Redmond
$930 - $985
Vintner's Place, Kirkland
$610 - $780
Hedgewood East, Redmond
$730 - $810
Trailside, Redmond
$686 - $735
Copperwood, Renton
$520 - $626
Parkwood Terrace, Woodinville
$680 - $750
Hazelwood Ridge, Newcastle
$605 - $790
Inglewood Landing, Sammamish
$880 - $962
Jacobs Landing, Issaquah
$834 - $929
Kirkwood Terrace, Sammamish
$1,200 - $1,500
English Landing P2, Redmond
$910 - $1,029
English Landing P1, Redmond
51
Heathers Ridge South, Redmond
$590 - $890
Cedar Landing, North Bend
$500 - $650
42nd Avenue Townhomes, Seattle
Pearl & Delores, Seattle
Monarch Ridge, Sammamish
$761 - $961
Pierce County:
Harbor Hill S-9, Gig Harbor
$379 - $447
Harbor Hill S-8, Gig Harbor
$376 - $444
Chambers Ridge, Tacoma
$480 - $525
Tehaleh, Bonney Lake
$321
The Enclave at Harbor Hill, Gig
Harbor
$545 - $595
Thurston County:
Campus Fairways, Lacey
$365 - $425
Kitsap County:
McCormick Meadows, Poulsbo
26
$280 - $357
Vinland Pointe, Poulsbo
69
$334
Mountain Aire, Poulsbo
$361 - $426
Closed Communities
Washington Total
850
Quadrant Homes Total
- 48 -
Texas
Brazoria County:
Sedona Lakes, Pearland
$452 - $506
Southern Trails, Pearland
$493 - $569
Pomona, Manvel
$420 - $480
Fort Bend County:
Cross Creek Ranch 60', Fulshear
$421 - $447
Cross Creek Ranch 65', Fulshear
$432 - $488
Cross Creek Ranch 70', Fulshear
$497 - $567
Cross Creek Ranch 80', Fulshear
62
$541 - $656
Cross Creek Ranch 90', Fulshear
$627 - $755
Villas at Cross Creek Ranch, Fulshear
$454 - $496
Cinco Ranch, Katy
100
$349 - $420
Harvest Green 75', Richmond
$438 - $518
Sienna Plantation 80', Missouri City
$542 - $650
Sienna Plantation 85', Missouri City
$531 - $650
Villas at Sienna South, Missouri City
$445 - $507
Lakes of Bella Terra, Richmond
$466 - $553
Villas at Aliana, Richmond
$437 - $503
Riverstone 55', Sugar Land
$397 - $460
Riverstone 80', Sugar Land
$559 - $710
Riverstone Avanti at Avalon 100',
Sugar Land
$1,203 - $1,232
The Townhomes at Imperial, Sugar
Land
$396 - $530
Galveston County:
Harborwalk, Hitchcock
$587 - $645
Harris County:
Fairfield, Cypress
$474 - $573
Lakes of Fairhaven, Cypress
2008
263
247
$410 - $664
Towne Lake Living Views, Cypress
$445 - $540
Calumet Townhomes, Houston
$637
The Groves, Humble
$454 - $505
Hidden Arbor, Cypress
$480
Clear Lake, Houston
521
$447 - $658
Montgomery County:
Barton Woods, Conroe
$401 - $601
Villas at Oakhurst, Porter
$375 - $458
Woodtrace, Woodtrace
$485 - $536
Northgrove, Tomball
$500
Bender's Landing Estates, Spring
$458 - $621
Creekside Park, The Woodlands
$488 - $641
Waller County:
Cane Island, Katy
$560 - $647
Other:
Avanti Custom Homes
2007
$416 - $643
Texas Casual Cottages - Round Top
$203 - $443
Texas Casual Cottages - Hill Country
$217 - $498
Texas Total
2,572
1,414
Trendmaker Homes Total
- 49 -
Southern California
Orange County:
Rancho Mission Viejo
Truewind, Huntington Beach
$1,065 - $1,180
Arcadia, Irvine
$1,189 - $1,420
Arcadia II, Irvine
$1,189 - $1,271
Fairwind, Huntington Beach
$822 - $1,012
Cariz, Irvine
112
$507 - $617
Messina, Irvine
$1,515 - $1,630
Aria-Rancho Mission Viejo
$630 - $667
Auberine-Rancho Mission Viejo
$1,005 - $1,115
Altana, San Diego
Topazridge, Riverside
$464 - $530
Topazridge II, Riverside
$459 - $515
Alegre, Temecula
96
$287 - $323
Aldea, Temecula
$262 - $298
Kite Ridge, Riverside
$435 - $460
Serrano Ridge at Sycamore Creek, Riverside
Terrassa Courts, Corona
$425 - $475
Terrassa Villas, Corona
$485 - $535
Avenswood, Azusa
Woodson, Playa Vista
Grayson, Santa Clarita
$517 - $550
San Bernardino County:
Sedona at Parkside, Ontario
$355 - $390
Kensington at Park Place, Ontario
$521 - $544
St. James at Park Place, Ontario
$448 - $479
The Westerlies, Oxnard
$331 - $504
Southern California Total
1,996
1,208
Northern California
Contra Costa County:
Berkshire at Barrington, Brentwood
$506 - $553
Hawthorne at Barrington, Brentwood
$549 - $605
Marquette at Barrington, Brentwood
$480 - $700
Wynstone at Barrington, Brentwood
$498 - $525
Penrose at Barrington, Brentwood
$498 - $515
Santa Clara County:
Avellino, Mountain View
Cobblestone, Milpitas
$960 - $1,163
San Mateo County:
Canterbury, San Mateo
76
$940 - $1,230
Solano County:
Redstone, Vacaville
141
126
$455 - $527
Ventana, Tracy
93
$438 - $540
Sundance, Mountain House
113
$550 - $615
Alameda County:
Cadence, Alameda Landing
$1,057 - $1,234
Linear, Alameda Landing
$685 - $915
Symmetry, Alameda Landing
$775 - $875
Commercial, Alameda Landing
$620
Parasol, Fremont
$605 - $815
Blackstone SFA at the Cannery, Hayward
$515 - $585
Blackstone SFD at the Cannery, Hayward
Northern California Total
1,379
1,031
203
173
3,375
1,039
2,239
443
483
Colorado
Douglas County:
Terrain 4000 Series, Castle Rock
149
$326 - $379
Terrain 3500 Series, Castle Rock
$307 - $330
Jefferson County:
Leyden Rock 4000 Series, Arvada
$385 - $441
Leyden Rock 5000 Series, Arvada
$444 - $499
Candelas 6000 Series, Arvada
$560 - $620
Denver County:
Platt Park North, Denver
$611 - $615
Larimer County:
Centerra 5000 Series, Loveland
$390 - $422
Arapahoe County:
Whispering Pines, Aurora
$518 - $588
Colorado Total
704
193
128
TRI Pointe Homes Total
4,079
1,232
- 50 -
Maryland
Anne Arundel County:
Hawthornes Grant, Arnold
Watson's Glen, Millersville
Frederick County:
Landsdale, Monrovia
Landsdale Village SFD
222
214
$495 - $635
Landsdale Everson Townhomes
$350 - $375
Landsdale TND Neo Everson SFD
$465 - $595
Howard County:
Walnut Creek, Ellicott City
$990 - $1,293
Cabin Branch, Clarksburg
Cabin Branch SFD
359
320
$480 - $719
Cabin Branch Boulevard
Townhomes
Cabin Branch Everson Townhomes
523
$375 - $390
Preserve at Stoney Spring-Lots for Sale
Preserve at Rock Creek, Rockville
$685 - $964
Poplar Run, Silver Spring
Poplar Run Everson Townhomes
136
$390 - $435
Poplar Run SFD
326
197
$562 - $717
Poplar Run Lots for Sale
Potomac Highlands, Potomac
Glenmont MetroCenter, Silver Spring
Maryland Total
2,150
1,790
Virginia
Fairfax County:
Reserve at Waples Mill, Oakton
$1,380 - $1,555
Stuart Mill & Timber Lake, Oakton
$1,363 - $1,675
Henrico County:
Stable Hill, Glen Allen
$517 - $620
Prince William County:
Villages of Piedmont, Haymarket
168
$370 - $422
Loudoun County:
Brambleton, Ashburn
English Manor Townhomes
$492 - $532
Glenmere at Brambleton SFD
$650 - $723
Glenmere at Brambleton
$461 - $465
West Park at Brambleton
Sold Out
One Loudoun, Ashburn
$675 - $710
Vistas at Lansdowne, Lansdowne
$569 - $650
Willowsford Grant II, Aldie
Willowsford Grant, Aldie
$925 - $930
Willowsford Greens, Aldie
$750 - $840
Virginia Total
858
470
388
151
Winchester Homes Total
3,008
TRI Pointe Group Total
33,648
7,852
Year of first delivery for future periods is based upon management’s estimates and is subject to change.
The number of homes to be built at completion is subject to change, and there can be no assurance that we will build these homes.
Owned lots as of September 30, 2015 include owned lots in backlog as of September 30, 2015.
Backlog consists of homes under sales contracts that had not yet been delivered, and there can be no assurance that delivery of sold homes will occur.
(5)
Of the total homes subject to pending sales contracts that have not been delivered as of September 30, 2015, 1,325 homes are under construction, 264 homes have completed construction, and 267 homes have not started construction.
(6)
Sales price range reflects base price only and excludes any lot premium, buyer incentives and buyer-selected options, which may vary from project to project. Sales prices for homes required to be sold pursuant to affordable housing requirements are excluded from sales price range. Sales prices reflect current pricing and might not be indicative of past or future pricing.
- 51 -
Critical Accounting Policies
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this report, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. Our notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statement contained elsewhere in this report and the audited financial statements contained in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 describe the significant accounting policies essential to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. Preparation of our financial statements requires estimate, judgements and assumptions. We believe that the estimates, judgements and assumptions that we have used are appropriate and correct based on information available at the time they were made. These estimates, judgements and assumptions can affect our reported assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported revenues and expenses during the period presented. If there is a material difference between these estimates, judgements and assumptions and actual facts, our financial statements may be affected.
In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP and does not require our judgement in its application. There are areas in which our judgement in selecting among available alternatives would not produce a materially different result, but there are some areas in which our judgment in selecting among available alternatives would produce a materially different result. See the notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements that contain additional information regarding our accounting policies and other disclosures.
See Note 1 to the accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
See Note 18 to the accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in interest rates on our outstanding variable rate debt. In addition, our operations are interest rate sensitive as higher mortgage interest rates could negatively affect housing demand. We did not utilize swaps, forward or option contracts on interest rates or commodities, or other types of derivative financial instruments as of or during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2015. We have not entered into and currently do not hold derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. Many of the statements contained in this section are forward looking and should be read in conjunction with our disclosures under the heading “Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements.”
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on such evaluation, management has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the Evaluation Date. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide a reasonable level of assurance of reaching our desired disclosure control objectives.
As discussed under Item 9A. of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014, we did not provide management’s report on internal control over financial reporting due to the nature and timing of changes to the Company’s internal controls as a result of the Merger with WRECO that was completed on July 7, 2014. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 will include a management’s report on internal control over financial reporting.
Our management is currently in the process of reviewing and refining accounting policies, processes and systems as a result of the Merger. These efforts may lead to changes in our internal control over financial reporting. Other than those noted above, there has not been any change in our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or that is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
- 52 -
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Various claims and actions that we consider normal to our business have been asserted and are pending against us. See Note 15, Commitments and Contingencies, of the condensed notes to the unaudited financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q.
There have been no significant changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 or in Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2015, respectively.
- 53 -
ExhibitNumber
Exhibit Description
Transaction Agreement, dated as of November 3, 2013, among TRI Pointe Homes, Inc., Weyerhaeuser Company, Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company, and Topaz Acquisition, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (filed Mar. 28, 2014))
Agreement and Plan of Merger to Form Holding Company, dated as of July 7, 2015, by and among TRI Pointe Homes, Inc., TRI Pointe Group, Inc. and TPG Merger, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K (filed July 7, 2015))
3.1
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of TRI Pointe Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K (filed July 7, 2015))
Amended and Restated Bylaws of TRI Pointe Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (filed July 7, 2015))
Specimen Common Stock Certificate of TRI Pointe Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (filed Dec. July 7, 2015))
Investor Rights Agreement, dated as of January 30, 2013, by and among TRI Pointe Homes, Inc., VIII/TPC Holdings, L.L.C., BMG Homes, Inc., The Bauer Revocable Trust U/D/T Dated December 31, 2003, Grubbs Family Trust Dated June 22, 2012, The Mitchell Family Trust U/D/T Dated February 8, 2000, Douglas J. Bauer, Thomas J. Mitchell and Michael D. Grubbs. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (filed Jan. 9, 2014))
First Amendment to Investor Rights Agreement, dated as of November 3, 2013, by and among TRI Pointe Homes, Inc., VIII/TPC Holdings, L.L.C., BMG Homes, Inc., The Bauer Revocable Trust U/D/T Dated December 31, 2003, Grubbs Family Trust Dated June 22, 2012, The Mitchell Family Trust U/D/T Dated February 8, 2000, Douglas F. Bauer, Thomas J. Mitchell and Michael D. Grubbs (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (filed Nov. 4, 2013))
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 30, 2013, among TRI Pointe Homes, Inc., VIII/TPC Holdings, L.L.C., and certain TRI Pointe Homes, Inc. stockholders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (filed Jan. 9, 2014))
4.5
Indenture, dated as of June 13, 2014, by and among Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (including form of 4.375% Senior Note due 2019) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (filed June 19, 2014))
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 7, 2014, among TRI Pointe Homes, Inc., Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, relating to the 4.375% Senior Notes due 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (filed July 7, 2014))
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 7, 2014, among the guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, relating to the 4.375% Senior Notes due 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (filed July 7, 2014))
4.8
Indenture, dated as of June 13, 2014, by and among Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (including form of 5.875% Senior Note due 2024) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (filed June 19, 2014))
4.9
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 7, 2014, among TRI Pointe Homes, Inc., Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, relating to the 5.875% Senior Notes due 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (filed July 7, 2014))
4.10
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 7, 2014, among the guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, relating to the 5.875% Senior Notes due 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (filed July 7, 2014))
4.11
Second Amendment to Investor Rights Agreement, dated as of July 7, 2015, among TRI Pointe Group, Inc., TRI Pointe Homes, Inc. VIII/TPC Holdings, L.L.C., BMG Homes, Inc., The Bauer Revocable Trust U/D/T Dated December 31, 2003, Grubbs Family Trust Dated June 22, 2012, The Mitchell Family Trust U/D/T Dated February 8, 2000, Douglas F. Bauer, Thomas J. Mitchell and Michael D. Grubbs (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (filed July 7, 2015))
- 54 -
4.12
Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 7, 2015, among TRI Point Group, Inc., TRI Pointe Homes, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, relating to the 4.375% Senior Notes due 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K (filed July 7, 2015))
4.13
Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 7, 2015, among TRI Point Group, Inc., TRI Pointe Homes, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, relating to the 5.875% Senior Notes due 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K (filed July 7, 2015))
4.14
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of July 7, 2015, among TRI Point Group, Inc., U.S. Bank National Association and the lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K (filed July 7, 2015))
4.15
First Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 7, 2015 among TRI Pointe Homes, Inc., TRI Pointe Group, Inc., VIII/TPC Holdings, L.L.C., BMG Homes, Inc., The Bauer Revocable Trust U/D/T Dated December 31, 2003, Grubbs Family Trust dated June 22, 2012, The Mitchell Family Trust U/D/T Dated February 8, 2000, Frankel Associates, L.P., Douglas F. Bauer, Thomas J. Mitchell, and Michael D. Grubbs (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (filed July 7, 2015))
10.1
Form of Amendment to Indemnification Agreement of TRI Pointe Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K (filed July 7, 2015))
10.2
Omnibus Amendment to the TRI Pointe Homes, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan, TRI Pointe Group Short-Term Incentive Plan, Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan and their related stock option, restricted stock unit, cash incentive award agreements and performance share unit agreements, dated as of July 7, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K (filed July 7, 2015))
10.3
First Amendment to Tax Sharing Agreement, dated as of July 7, 2015, among TRI Pointe Group, Inc., TRI Pointe Homes, Inc., TRI Pointe Holdings, Inc. (f/k/a Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company) and Weyerhaeuser Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K (filed July 7, 2015))
31.1
Chief Executive Officer Section 302 Certification of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2
Chief Financial Officer Section 302 Certification of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1
Chief Executive Officer Section 906 Certification of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2
Chief Financial Officer Section 906 Certification of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
The following materials from TRI Pointe Group, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, and (v) Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statement.
- 55 -
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
By:
/s/ Douglas F. Bauer
Douglas F. Bauer
Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Michael D. Grubbs
Michael D. Grubbs
Chief Financial Officer
Date: November 6, 2015
- 56 -