Aimco - 10-K annual report

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Apartment Investment and Management Company, or Aimco, is a Maryland corporation incorporated on January 10, 1994. We are a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT, engaged in the acquisition, ownership, management and redevelopment of apartment properties. As of December 31, 2007, we owned or managed a real estate portfolio of 1,169 apartment properties containing 203,040 apartment units located in 46 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. Based on apartment unit data compiled by the National Multi Housing Council, as of January 1, 2007, we were the largest owner and operator of apartment properties in the United States. Our portfolio includes garden style, mid-rise and high-rise properties.

 

We own an equity interest in, and consolidate the majority of, the properties in our owned real estate portfolio. These properties represent the consolidated real estate holdings in our financial statements, which we refer to as consolidated properties. In addition, we have an equity interest in, but do not consolidate for financial statement purposes, certain properties that are accounted for under the equity or cost methods. These properties represent our investment in unconsolidated real estate partnerships in our financial statements, which we refer to as unconsolidated properties. Additionally, we provide property management and asset management services to certain properties, and in certain cases we may indirectly own generally less than one percent of the operations of such

properties through a partnership syndication or other fund. Our equity holdings and managed properties are as follows as of December 31, 2007:

 

 

Through our wholly-owned subsidiaries, AIMCO-GP, Inc. and AIMCO-LP, Inc., we own a majority of the ownership interests in AIMCO Properties, L.P., which we refer to as the Aimco Operating Partnership. As of December 31, 2007, we held an interest of approximately 91% in the common partnership units and equivalents of the Aimco Operating Partnership. We conduct substantially all of our business and own substantially all of our assets through the Aimco Operating Partnership. Interests in the Aimco Operating Partnership that are held by limited partners other than Aimco are referred to as “OP Units.” OP Units include common OP Units, partnership preferred units, or preferred OP Units, and high performance partnership units, or High Performance Units. Generally after a holding period of twelve months, holders of common OP Units may redeem such units for cash or, at the Aimco Operating Partnership’s option, Aimco Class A Common Stock, which we refer to as Common Stock. At December 31, 2007, we had 92,795,891 shares of our Common Stock outstanding and the Aimco Operating Partnership had 9,682,619 common OP Units and equivalents outstanding for a combined total of 102,478,510 shares of Common Stock and OP Units outstanding (excluding preferred OP Units).

 

Since our initial public offering in July 1994, we have completed numerous transactions, including purchases of properties and interests in entities that own or manage properties, expanding our portfolio of owned or managed properties from 132 properties with 29,343 apartment units to a peak of over 2,100 properties with 379,000 apartment units. As of December 31, 2007, our portfolio of ownedand/ormanaged properties consists of 1,169 properties with 203,040 apartment units.

 

Except as the context otherwise requires, “we,” “our,” “us” and the “Company” refer to Aimco, the Aimco Operating Partnership and their consolidated entities, collectively. As used herein, and except where the context otherwise requires, “partnership” refers to a limited partnership or a limited liability company and “partner” refers to a limited partner in a limited partnership or a member in a limited liability company.

 

Our Annual Report onForm 10-K,our Quarterly Reports onForm 10-Q,our Current Reports onForm 8-Kand any amendments to any of those reports that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission are available free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable through our website at www.aimco.com. The information contained on our website is not incorporated into this Annual Report. Our Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “AIV.” In 2007, our chief executive officer submitted his annual corporate governance listing standards certification to the New York Stock Exchange, which certification was unqualified.

 

We operate in two reportable segments: real estate (owning, operating and redeveloping apartments) and asset management (providing asset management and investment services). For further information on these segments, see Note 16 of the consolidated financial statements in Item 8, and Management’s Discussion and Analysis in Item 7.

 

Our principal financial objective is to increase long-term stockholder value per share, as measured by Economic Income, which consists of cash dividends and changes in Net Asset Value, or NAV, which is the estimated fair value of our assets, net of debt.

We strive to meet our objectives through:

 

 

Our business is organized around three core activities: Property Operations, Redevelopment, and Asset Management. These three core activities, along with our financial strategy, are described in more detail below.

 

Our portfolio is comprised of two business components: conventional and affordable. Our conventional operations, which are market-rate apartments with rents paid by the resident, include 439 properties with 127,532 units. Our affordable operations consist of 312 properties with 37,104 units, with rents that are generally paid, in whole or part by a government agency.

 

We operate a broad range of property types, from suburban garden-style to urban high-rise properties in 46 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico at a broad range of average monthly rental rates, with most between $700 and $1,000 per month, and reaching as high as $6,750 per month at some of our premier properties. This diversification insulates us, to some degree, from inevitable downturns in any one market.

 

Our conventional operations currently are organized into four divisions and are further divided into 17 regional operating centers, or ROCs. A Regional Vice President, or RVP, supervises each ROC. To manage our nationwide portfolio more efficiently and to increase the benefits from our local management expertise, we have given direct responsibility for operations to the RVP with regular reviews with senior management. To enable the RVPs to focus on sales and service, as well as to improve financial control and budgeting, we have dedicated a regional financial officer to support each RVP. In addition, with the exception of routine maintenance, our specialized Construction Services group manages allon-siteimprovements, thus reducing the need for RVPs to spend time on oversight of construction projects. We seek to improve our corporate-level oversight of conventional property operations by developing better systems, standardizing business goals, operational measurements and internal reporting, and enhancing financial controls over field operations. Our objectives are to focus on the areas discussed below:

 

 

 

We are among the largest owners and operators of affordable properties in the United States. Affordable housing properties are generally those properties for which all or a portion of the rent is paid by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, or HUD, and sometimes by state housing agencies. Affordable properties tend to have stable rents and occupancy due to government subsidies of rent payments and thus are much less affected by market fluctuations.

 

 

We believe that the physical condition and amenities of our apartment properties are important factors in our ability to maintain and increase rental rates. In 2007, we spent $102.6 million, or $772 per owned apartment unit, for Capital Replacements, which represent the share of expenditures that are deemed to replace the consumed portion of acquired capital assets. Additionally, we spent $123.7 million for Capital Improvements, which are non-redevelopment capital expenditures that are made to enhance the value, profitability or useful life of an asset from its original purchase condition.

 

 

In addition to maintenance and improvements of our properties, we focus on the redevelopment of certain properties each year. We believe redevelopment of certain properties in superior locations provides advantages overground-updevelopment, enabling us to generate rents comparable to new properties with lower financial risk, in less time and with reduced delays associated with governmental permits and authorizations. Redevelopment work also includes seeking entitlements from local governments, which enhance the value of our existing portfolio by increasing density, that is, the right to add residential units to a site. We undertake a range of redevelopment projects: from those in which a substantial number of all available units are vacated for significant renovations to the property to those in which there is significant renovation, such as exteriors, common areas or unit improvements, typically done upon lease expirations without the need to vacate units on any wholesale or substantial basis. We have specialized Redevelopment and Construction Services groups, which include engineers, architects and construction managers, to oversee these projects.

 

Our share of 2007 redevelopment expenditures on active and completed projects totaled $290.9 million and $61.9 million in conventional and affordable redevelopment projects, respectively. During 2007, we completed redevelopment projects at 16 conventional properties and one affordable property. We also delivered approximately 4,900 conventional and 1,200 affordable redeveloped units, respectively, some of which are part of redevelopment

projects completed in 2007 and some of which are part of ongoing projects. As of December 31, 2007, we had 48 conventional and 11 affordable redevelopment projects at various stages of completion as follows:

 

 

In 2008, we expect to invest between $250.0 and $300.0 million in conventional redevelopment projects and we expect to invest approximately $72.0 million in affordable redevelopment projects, predominantly funded by third-party tax credit equity.

 

Asset management includes activities related to our owned portfolio of properties as well as services provided to affiliated partnerships. Within our owned portfolio, these activities include strategic capital allocation decisions and portfolio management activities, that is, transactions to buy, sell or modify our ownership interest in properties, including through the use of partnerships and joint ventures. The purpose of these transactions is to re-adjust Aimco investments to reflect our decisions regarding target allocations to geographic markets and to investment types. We provide similar services to affiliated partnerships, together with such other services as property management, financial management, accounting, investor reporting, property debt financings, tax credit syndication, redevelopment and construction management. When we provide these services with respect to our own investments, there is no separate compensation and their benefit is seen in property operating results and in investment gains. When we provide these services to affiliated third parties, they are separately compensated by agreed fees. While many teams at Aimco are involved in the delivery of these services, the negotiation of transactions for Aimco’s account and the oversight of services provided to others is primarily the responsibility of our Aimco Capital team.

 

Portfolio management involves the ongoing allocation of investment capital to meet our geographic and product type goals. We target geographic balance in Aimco’s diversified portfolio in order to optimize risk-adjusted returns and to avoid the risk of undue concentration in any particular market. We also seek to balance the portfolio by product type, with both high quality properties in excellent locations and also high land value properties that support redevelopment activities.

 

During 2007, we refined our geographic allocation strategy to focus on the top 20 U.S. markets as measured by total market capitalization. We believe these markets to be deep, relatively liquid and possessing desirable long-term growth characteristics. They are primarily coastal markets, and also include a number of Sun Belt cities and Chicago, Illinois. We may also invest in other markets on an opportunistic basis. As we implement this strategy, we expect to reduce our investment in markets outside the top 20 markets and to increase our investment in the top 20 markets both by making acquisitions and by redevelopment spending. We expect too that increased geographic focus will add to our investment knowledge and increase operating efficiencies based on local economies of scale.

 

During 2007, the top 20 U.S. markets contributed 70.8% of our net operating income, or NOI, from conventional property operations. Our top five markets by NOI contribution include the metropolitan areas of Washington, D.C., Los Angeles, California, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and Miami, Florida as well as the New England region. In 2007, we exited 11 markets and as of December 31, 2007, our conventional portfolio included 439 properties with 127,532 units in 42 markets.

 

During 2007, we invested in our conventional portfolio both by funding redevelopment and by making acquisitions. At different times, we have made acquisitions through:

 

 

 

In 2007, we invested $290.9 million in redevelopment of properties in our conventional portfolio. We also completed acquisitions of 16 conventional properties, containing approximately 1,300 residential units for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $217.0 million (including transaction costs). These properties are located in New York, California, Florida and Illinois. We also acquired additional interests in 48 partnerships (including VMS National Properties Joint Venture) for an aggregate purchase price of $219.8 million (including transaction costs, assumption of debt and other consideration).

 

Portfolio management also includes dispositions of properties located within markets we intend to exit, properties in less favored locations within our target markets, and properties that do not meet our long-term investment criteria. Property sales proceeds are used to fund redevelopment spending, acquisitions, and such other corporate purposes as debt reduction, preferred stock redemption and, in January 2008, a special dividend. In 2007, we sold 46 conventional properties generating net cash proceeds to us, after repayment of existing debt, payment of transaction costs and distributions to limited partners, of $125.5 million.

 

Portfolio management can include the use of partnerships and joint ventures to allow us to attract and serve high quality investment partners, and to rebalance efficiently our geographic market allocation of capital while maintaining our local operating platform and its operational scale. For example, during 2007, we entered into a joint venture agreement that provides for the co-ownership of three multi-family properties with 1,382 units located in west Los Angeles. We retained a 53% ownership interest in the properties and sold a 47% interest generating net cash proceeds of approximately $202.0 million. We will provide a variety of asset management services to our investment partner, including continuing property management, in return for asset management and other fees. During 2008, we plan to pursue similar joint ventures.

 

During 2007, we earned $15.6 million in asset management fees from 14 affiliated partnerships owning conventional properties.

 

The portfolio management strategy for our affordable portfolio is similar to that for our conventional portfolio. During 2007, we invested $61.9 million in redevelopment of affordable properties, funded primarily by proceeds from the sale of tax credits to institutional partners. We made no acquisitions of affordable properties and we made $7.0 million of acquisitions of partnership interests in partnerships owning affordable properties. As with conventional properties, we also seek to dispose of properties that are inconsistent with our long-term investment and operating strategies. During 2007, we sold 30 properties from our affordable portfolio, generating net cash proceeds to us, after repayment of existing debt, payment of transaction costs and distributions to limited partners, of $15.4 million. As of December 31, 2007, our affordable portfolio included 312 properties with 37,104 units.

 

During 2007, we earned $58.2 million in asset management fees from 78 affiliated partnerships owning affordable properties.

 

We are focused on minimizing our cost of capital on a risk-adjusted basis. We primarily use non-recourse property debt with laddered maturities and minimize reliance on corporate debt. The lower risk inherent in non-recourse property debt permits us to operate with higher debt leverage and a lower weighted average cost of capital. During 2007, we closed property loans totaling $1,816.6 million at an average interest rate of 6.10%, which included the refinancing of property loans totaling $772.8 million with prior interest rates averaging 7.05%. In addition to the refinancing activity, the property loans included placing loans on newly acquired properties, new financings on existing properties, redevelopment loans and the modification of terms on existing property debt. We use floating rate property and corporate debt to provide lower interest costs over time at a level that considers

acceptable earnings volatility. We are also focused on maintaining liquidity, and as of December 31, 2007, had available resources totaling $675 million.

 

In attracting and retaining residents to occupy our properties we compete with numerous other housing alternatives. Our properties compete directly with other rental apartments, as well as with condominiums and single-family homes that are available for rent or purchase in the markets in which our properties are located. Principal factors of competition include rent or price charged, attractiveness of the location and property and quality and breadth of services. The number of competitive properties relative to demand in a particular area has a material effect on our ability to lease apartment units at our properties and on the rents we charge. In certain markets there exists oversupply of single family homes and condominiums that affects the pricing and occupancy of our rental apartments. Additionally, we compete with other real estate investors, including other apartment REITs, pension and investment funds, partnerships and investment companies in acquiring, redeveloping and managing apartment properties. This competition affects our ability to acquire properties we want to add to our portfolio and the price that we pay in such acquisitions.

 

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which we refer to as the Code, commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 1994, and intend to continue to operate in such a manner. Our current and continuing qualification as a REIT depends on our ability to meet the various requirements imposed by the Code, which are related to organizational structure, distribution levels, diversity of stock ownership and certain restrictions with regard to owned assets and categories of income. If we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we will generally not be subject to United States Federal corporate income tax on our taxable income that is currently distributed to stockholders. This treatment substantially eliminates the “double taxation” (at the corporate and stockholder levels) that generally results from investment in a corporation.

 

Even if we qualify as a REIT, we may be subject to United States Federal income and excise taxes in various situations, such as on our undistributed income. We also will be required to pay a 100% tax on any net income on non-arm’s length transactions between us and a TRS (described below) and on any net income from sales of property that was property held for sale to customers in the ordinary course. We and our stockholders may be subject to state or local taxation in various state or local jurisdictions, including those in which we transact business or our stockholders reside. In addition, we could also be subject to the alternative minimum tax, or AMT, on our items of tax preference. The state and local tax laws may not conform to the United States Federal income tax treatment. Any taxes imposed on us reduce our operating cash flow and net income.

 

Certain of our operations (property management, asset management, risk, etc.) are conducted through taxable REIT subsidiaries, each of which we refer to as a TRS. A TRS is a C-corporation that has not elected REIT status and as such is subject to United States Federal corporate income tax. We use TRS entities to facilitate our ability to offer certain services and activities to our residents and investment partners, as these services and activities generally cannot be offered directly by the REIT.

 

 

Apartment properties and their owners are subject to various laws, ordinances and regulations, including those related to real estate broker licensing and regulations relating to recreational facilities such as swimming pools, activity centers and other common areas. Changes in laws increasing the potential liability for environmental conditions existing on properties or increasing the restrictions on discharges or other conditions, as well as changes in laws affecting development, construction and safety requirements, may result in significant unanticipated expenditures, which would adversely affect our net income and cash flows from operating activities. In addition, future enactment of rent control or rent stabilization laws or other laws regulating multifamily housing may reduce rental revenue or increase operating costs in particular markets.

 

Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal or remediation, of certain hazardous substances present on a property. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of the hazardous substances. In connection with the ownership, operation and management of properties, we could potentially be liable for environmental liabilities or costs associated with our properties or properties we acquire or manage in the future. These and other risks related to environmental matters are described in more detail in Item 1A, “Risk Factors.”

 

Our primary lines of insurance coverage are property, general liability, and workers’ compensation. We believe that our insurance coverages adequately insure our properties against the risk of loss attributable to fire, earthquake, hurricane, tornado, flood, terrorism and other perils and adequately insure us against other risk. Our coverage includes deductibles, retentions and limits that are customary in the industry. We have established loss prevention, loss mitigation, claims handling, litigation management and loss reserving procedures to manage our exposure.

 

We currently have approximately 5,900 employees, of which approximately 4,400 are at the property level, performing variouson-sitefunctions, with the balance managing corporate and regional operations, including investment and debt transactions, legal, financial reporting, accounting, information systems, human resources and other support functions. Unions represent approximately 150 of our employees. We have never experienced a work stoppage and believe we maintain satisfactory relations with our employees.

 

The risk factors noted in this section and other factors noted throughout this Annual Report, describe certain risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement.

 

Our ability to make payments to our investors depends on our ability to generate net operating income in excess of required debt payments and capital expenditure requirements. Net operating income may be adversely affected by events or conditions beyond our control, including:

 

 

We intend to continue to redevelop certain of our properties. These activities are subject to the following risks:

 

 

The selective acquisition of properties is a component of our strategy. However, we may not be able to complete transactions successfully in the future. Although we seek to acquire properties when such acquisitions increase our net income, Funds From Operations or net asset value, such transactions may fail to perform in accordance with our expectations. In particular, following acquisition, the value and operational performance of a property may be diminished if obsolescence or neighborhood changes occur before we are able to redevelop or sell the property.

 

Our strategy is generally to incur debt to increase the return on our equity while maintaining acceptable interest coverage ratios. For the year ended December 31, 2007, we had a ratio of free cash flow (net operating income less spending for capital replacements) to combined interest expense and preferred stock dividends of 1.6:1. Our organizational documents do not limit the amount of debt that we may incur, and we have significant amounts of debt outstanding. Payments of principal and interest may leave us with insufficient cash resources to operate our properties or pay distributions required to be paid in order to maintain our qualification as a REIT. We are also subject to the risk that our cash flow from operations will be insufficient to make required payments of principal and interest, and the risk that existing indebtedness may not be refinanced or that the terms of any refinancing will not be as favorable as the terms of existing indebtedness. If we fail to make required payments of principal and interest on secured debt, our lenders could foreclose on the properties securing such debt, which would result in loss of income and asset value to us. As of December 31, 2007, substantially all of the properties that we owned or controlled were encumbered by debt.

 

As of December 31, 2007, we had approximately $1,754.4 million of variable-rate indebtedness outstanding. Of the total debt subject to variable interest rates, floating rate tax-exempt bond financing was $698.4 million. Floating rate tax-exempt bond financing is benchmarked against the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association Municipal Swap Index, or SIFMA, rate (previously the Bond Market Association index), which since 1981 has averaged 68% of the30-day LIBOR rate. If this relationship continues, an increase in30-day LIBOR of 1.0% (0.68% in tax-exempt interest rates) would result in our income before minority interests and cash flows being reduced by $15.3 million on an annual basis. This would be offset by variable rate interest income earned on certain assets, including cash and cash equivalents and notes receivable, as well as interest that is capitalized on a portion of this variable rate debt incurred in connection with our redevelopment activities. Considering these offsets, the same increase in30-day LIBOR would result in our income before minority interests being reduced by $6.5 million on an annual basis.

 

Some of our debt and other securities contain covenants that restrict our ability to make distributions or other payments to our investors unless certain financial tests or other criteria are satisfied. Our credit facility provides, among other things, that we may make distributions to our investors during any four consecutive fiscal quarters in an aggregate amount that does not exceed the greater of 95% of our Funds From Operations for such period or such amount as may be necessary to maintain our REIT status. Our outstanding classes of preferred stock prohibit the payment of dividends on our Common Stock if we fail to pay the dividends to which the holders of the preferred stock are entitled.

 

Our apartment properties compete for residents with other housing alternatives, including other rental apartments, condominiums and single-family homes that are available for rent, as well as new and existing condominiums and single-family homes for sale. Competitive residential housing in a particular area could adversely affect our ability to lease apartments and to increase or maintain rental rates. The current challenges in the credit and housing markets have increased housing inventory that competes with our apartment properties.

 

All of our properties are owned, and all of our operations are conducted, by the Aimco Operating Partnership and our other subsidiaries. As a result, we depend on distributions and other payments from our subsidiaries in order to satisfy our financial obligations and make payments to our investors. The ability of our subsidiaries to make such distributions and other payments depends on their earnings and may be subject to statutory or contractual limitations. As an equity investor in our subsidiaries, our right to receive assets upon their liquidation or reorganization will be effectively subordinated to the claims of their creditors. To the extent that we are recognized as a creditor of such subsidiaries, our claims may still be subordinate to any security interest in or other lien on their assets and to any of their debt or other obligations that are senior to our claims.

 

Real estate investments are relatively illiquid and cannot always be sold quickly. Our freedom to sell properties is also restricted by REIT tax rules. Thus, we may not be able to change our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other market conditions. Our ability to dispose of assets in the future will depend on prevailing economic and market conditions. This could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

We have engaged in, and intend to continue to engage in, the selective acquisition of interests in partnerships controlled by us that own apartment properties. In some cases, we have acquired the general partner of a partnership

and then made an offer to acquire the limited partners’ interests in the partnership. In these transactions, we may be subject to litigation based on claims that we, as the general partner, have breached our fiduciary duty to our limited partners or that the transaction violates the relevant partnership agreement or state law. Although we intend to comply with our fiduciary obligations and the relevant partnership agreements, we may incur additional costs in connection with the defense or settlement of this type of litigation. In some cases, this type of litigation may adversely affect our desire to proceed with, or our ability to complete, a particular transaction. Any litigation of this type could also have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

We are self-insured for a portion of our consolidated properties’ exposure to casualty losses resulting from fire, earthquake, hurricane, tornado, flood and other perils. We recognize casualty losses or gains based on the net book value of the affected property and any related insurance proceeds. In many instances, the actual cost to repair or replace the property may exceed its net book value and any insurance proceeds. We also insure certain unconsolidated properties for a portion of their exposure to such losses. In addition, we are self-insured for a portion of our exposure to third-party claims related to our employee health insurance plans, workers’ compensation coverage, and general liability exposure. With respect to our insurance obligations to unconsolidated properties and our exposure to claims of third parties, we establish reserves at levels that reflect our known and estimated losses. The ultimate cost of losses and the impact of unforeseen events may vary materially from recorded reserves, and variances may adversely affect our operating results and financial condition. We purchase insurance (or reinsurance where we insure unconsolidated properties) to reduce our exposure to losses and limit our financial losses on large individual risks. The availability and cost of insurance are determined by market conditions outside our control. No assurance can be made that we will be able to obtain and maintain insurance at the same levels and on the same terms as we do today. If we are not able to obtain or maintain insurance in amounts we consider appropriate for our business, or if the cost of obtaining such insurance increases materially, we may have to retain a larger portion of the potential loss associated with our exposures to risks. The extent of our losses in connection with catastrophic events is a function of the severity of the event and the total amount of exposure in the affected area. When we have geographic concentration of exposures, a single catastrophe (such as an earthquake) or destructive weather trend affecting a region may have a significant impact on our financial condition and results of operations. We cannot accurately predict catastrophes, or the number and type of catastrophic events that will affect us. As a result, our operating and financial results may vary significantly from one period to the next. While we anticipate and plan for losses, there can be no assurance that our financial results will not be adversely affected by our exposure to losses arising from catastrophic events in the future that exceed our previous experience and assumptions.

 

Our success depends upon the retention of our senior management, including Terry Considine, our chief executive officer and president. There are no assurances that we would be able to find qualified replacements for the individuals who make up our senior management if their services were no longer available. The loss of services of one or more members of our senior management team could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We do not currently maintain key-man life insurance for any of our employees. The loss of any member of senior management could adversely affect our ability to pursue effectively our business strategy.

 

We own consolidated and unconsolidated equity interests in certain properties and manage other properties that benefit from governmental programs intended to provide housing to people with low or moderate incomes. These programs, which are usually administered by HUD or state housing finance agencies, typically provide mortgage insurance, favorable financing terms, tax-credit equity, or rental assistance payments to the property owners. As a condition of the receipt of assistance under these programs, the properties must comply with various requirements, which typically limit rents to pre-approved amounts and impose restrictions on resident incomes.

Failure to comply with these requirements and restrictions may result in financial penalties or loss of benefits. We usually need to obtain the approval of HUD in order to manage, or acquire a significant interest in, a HUD-assisted property. We may not always receive such approval.

 

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or ADA, all places intended to be used by the public are required to meet certain Federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Likewise, the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, or FHAA, requires apartment properties first occupied after March 13, 1990, to be accessible to the handicapped. These and other Federal, state and local laws may require modifications to our properties, or affect renovations of the properties. Noncompliance with these laws could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants and also could result in an order to correct any non-complying feature, which could result in substantial capital expenditures. Although we believe that our properties are substantially in compliance with present requirements, we may incur unanticipated expenses to comply with the ADA and the FHAA in connection with the ongoing operation or redevelopment of our properties.

 

Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal or remediation, of certain hazardous substances present on a property. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of the hazardous substances. The presence of, or the failure to manage or remedy properly, hazardous substances may adversely affect occupancy at affected apartment communities and the ability to sell or finance affected properties. In addition to the costs associated with investigation and remediation actions brought by government agencies, and potential fines or penalties imposed by such agencies in connection therewith, the presence of hazardous substances on a property could result in claims by private plaintiffs for personal injury, disease, disability or other infirmities. Various laws also impose liability for the cost of removal, remediation or disposal of hazardous substances through a licensed disposal or treatment facility. Anyone who arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances is potentially liable under such laws. These laws often impose liability whether or not the person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal facility. In connection with the ownership, operation and management of properties, we could potentially be liable for environmental liabilities or costs associated with our properties or properties we acquire or manage in the future.

 

We have been named as a defendant in lawsuits that have alleged personal injury and property damage as a result of the presence of mold. In addition, we are aware of lawsuits against owners and managers of multifamily properties asserting claims of personal injury and property damage caused by the presence of mold, some of which have resulted in substantial monetary judgments or settlements. We have only limited insurance coverage for property damage loss claims arising from the presence of mold and for personal injury claims related to mold exposure. We have implemented policies, procedures, third-party audits and training, and include a detailed moisture intrusion and mold assessment during acquisition due diligence. We believe these measures will prevent or eliminate mold exposure from our properties and will minimize the effects that mold may have on our residents. To date, we have not incurred any material costs or liabilities relating to claims of mold exposure or to abate mold conditions. Because the law regarding mold is unsettled and subject to change we can make no assurance that liabilities resulting from the presence of or exposure to mold will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

 

If we fail to qualify as a REIT, we will not be allowed a deduction for dividends paid to our stockholders in computing our taxable income, and we will be subject to Federal income tax at regular corporate rates, including any applicable alternative minimum tax. This would substantially reduce our funds available for payment to our investors. Unless entitled to relief under certain provisions of the Code, we also would be disqualified from taxation

as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which we ceased to qualify as a REIT. In addition, our failure to qualify as a REIT would place us in default under our primary credit facilities.

 

We believe that we operate, and have always operated, in a manner that enables us to meet the requirements for qualification as a REIT for Federal income tax purposes. Our continued qualification as a REIT will depend on our satisfaction of certain asset, income, investment, organizational, distribution, stockholder ownership and other requirements on a continuing basis. Our ability to satisfy the asset tests depends upon our analysis of the fair market values of our assets, some of which are not susceptible to a precise determination, and for which we will not obtain independent appraisals. Our compliance with the REIT income and quarterly asset requirements also depends upon our ability to manage successfully the composition of our income and assets on an ongoing basis. Moreover, the proper classification of an instrument as debt or equity for Federal income tax purposes may be uncertain in some circumstances, which could affect the application of the REIT qualification requirements. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, will not contend that our interests in subsidiaries or other issuers constitutes a violation of the REIT requirements. Moreover, future economic, market, legal, tax or other considerations may cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT, or our Board of Directors may determine to revoke our REIT status.

 

 

As a REIT, we are subject to annual distribution requirements, which limit the amount of cash we retain for other business purposes, including amounts to fund our growth. We generally must distribute annually at least 90% of our net REIT taxable income, excluding any net capital gain, in order for our distributed earnings not to be subject to corporate income tax. We intend to make distributions to our stockholders to comply with the requirements of the Code. However, differences in timing between the recognition of taxable income and the actual receipt of cash could require us to sell assets or borrow funds on a short-term or long-term basis to meet the 90% distribution requirement of the Code.

 

 

Our charter limits ownership of our Common Stock by any single stockholder (applying certain “beneficial ownership” rules under the Federal securities laws) to 8.7% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock, or 15% in the case of certain pension trusts, registered investment companies and Mr. Considine. Our charter also limits ownership of our Common Stock and preferred stock by any single stockholder to 8.7% of the value of the outstanding Common Stock and preferred stock, or 15% in the case of certain pension trusts, registered investment companies and Mr. Considine. The charter also prohibits anyone from buying shares of our capital stock if the purchase would result in us losing our REIT status. This could happen if a transaction results in fewer than 100 persons owning all of our shares of capital stock or results in five or fewer persons (applying certain attribution rules of the Code) owning 50% or more of the value of all of our shares of capital stock. If anyone acquires shares in excess of the ownership limit or in violation of the ownership requirements of the Code for REITs:

 

 

We may purchase the shares of capital stock held in trust at a price equal to the lesser of the price paid by the transferee of the shares or the then current market price. If the trust transfers any of the shares of capital stock, the affected person will receive the lesser of the price paid for the shares or the then current market price. An individual who acquires shares of capital stock that violate the above rules bears the risk that the individual:

 

 

 

The 8.7% ownership limit discussed above may have the effect of precluding acquisition of control of us by a third party without the consent of our Board of Directors. Our charter authorizes our Board of Directors to issue up to 510,587,500 shares of capital stock. As of December 31, 2007, 426,157,736 shares were classified as Common Stock, of which 92,795,891 were outstanding, and 84,429,764 shares were classified as preferred stock, of which 24,950,200 were outstanding. Under our charter, our Board of Directors has the authority to classify and reclassify any of our unissued shares of capital stock into shares of capital stock with such preferences, rights, powers and restrictions as our Board of Directors may determine. The authorization and issuance of a new class of capital stock could have the effect of delaying or preventing someone from taking control of us, even if a change in control were in our stockholders’ best interests.

 

As a Maryland corporation, we are subject to various Maryland laws that may have the effect of discouraging offers to acquire us and increasing the difficulty of consummating any such offers, even if an acquisition would be in our stockholders’ best interests. The Maryland General Corporation Law restricts mergers and other business combination transactions between us and any person who acquires beneficial ownership of shares of our stock representing 10% or more of the voting power without our Board of Directors’ prior approval. Any such business combination transaction could not be completed until five years after the person acquired such voting power, and generally only with the approval of stockholders representing 80% of all votes entitled to be cast and 662/3% of the votes entitled to be cast, excluding the interested stockholder, or upon payment of a fair price. Maryland law also provides generally that a person who acquires shares of our capital stock that represent 10% or more of the voting power in electing directors will have no voting rights unless approved by a vote of two-thirds of the shares eligible to vote. Additionally, Maryland law provides, among other things, that the board of directors has broad discretion in adopting stockholders’ rights plans and has the sole power to fix the record date, time and place for special meetings of the stockholders. In addition, Maryland law provides that corporations that:

 

 

may elect in their charter or bylaws or by resolution of the board of directors to be subject to all or part of a special subtitle that provides that:

 

 

To date, we have not made any of the elections described above.

 

None.

 

Our properties are located in 46 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. As of December 31, 2007, our conventional properties are operated through 17 regional operating centers and our affordable properties are operated through three regional operating centers. The following table sets forth information on all of our property operations as of December 31, 2007 and 2006:

 

 

 

At December 31, 2007, we owned an equity interest in and consolidated 657 properties containing 153,758 apartment units, which we refer to as “consolidated.” These consolidated properties contain, on average, 234 apartment units, with the largest property containing 2,877 apartment units. These properties offer residents a range of amenities, including swimming pools, clubhouses, spas, fitness centers and tennis courts. Many of the apartment units offer features such as vaulted ceilings, fireplaces, washer and dryerhook-ups,cable television, balconies and patios. Additional information on our consolidated properties is contained in “Schedule III — Real Estate and

Accumulated Depreciation” in this Annual Report. At December 31, 2007, we held an equity interest in and did not consolidate 94 properties containing 10,878 apartment units, which we refer to as “unconsolidated.” In addition, we provided property management services for 36 properties containing 3,228 apartment units, and asset management services for 382 properties containing 35,176 apartment units. In certain cases we may indirectly own generally less than one percent of the operations of such properties through a partnership syndication or other fund.

 

Substantially all of our consolidated properties are encumbered by mortgage indebtedness. At December 31, 2007, our consolidated properties were encumbered by aggregate mortgage indebtedness totaling $6,981.7 million having an aggregate weighted average interest rate of 5.86%. Such mortgage indebtedness was secured by 634 properties with a combined net book value of $9,203.7 million. Included in the 634 properties, we had a total of 53 mortgage loans on 47 properties, with an aggregate principal balance outstanding of $763.5 million, that were each secured by property and cross-collateralized with certain (but not all) other mortgage loans within this group of mortgage loans (see Note 6 of the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for additional information about our indebtedness).

 

See the information under the caption “Legal Matters” in Note 8 of the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for information regarding legal proceedings, which information is incorporated by reference in this Item 3.

 

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2007.

 

Our Common Stock has been listed and traded on the NYSE under the symbol “AIV” since July 22, 1994. The following table sets forth the quarterly high and low sales prices of our Common Stock, as reported on the NYSE, and the dividends declared in the periods indicated:

 

 

 

 

On February 25, 2008, the closing price of our Common Stock was $37.32 per share, as reported on the NYSE, and there were 91,736,837 shares of Common Stock outstanding, held by 3,728 stockholders of record. The number of holders does not include individuals or entities who beneficially own shares but whose shares are held of record by a broker or clearing agency, but does include each such broker or clearing agency as one recordholder.

 

As a REIT, we are required to distribute annually to holders of common stock at least 90% of our “real estate investment trust taxable income,” which, as defined by the Code and United States Department of Treasury regulations, is generally equivalent to net taxable ordinary income. We measure our profitability through Economic Income, which consists of cash dividends and changes in NAV. Future payment of dividends are at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on numerous factors including our financial condition, capital requirements,

the annual distribution requirements under the provisions of the Code applicable to REITs and such other factors as our Board of Directors deems relevant.

 

From time to time, we issue shares of Common Stock in exchange for common and preferred OP Units tendered to the Aimco Operating Partnership for redemption in accordance with the terms and provisions of the agreement of limited partnership of the Aimco Operating Partnership. Such shares are issued based on an exchange ratio of one share for each common OP Unit or the applicable conversion ratio for preferred OP Units. The shares are generally issued in exchange for OP Units in private transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to Section 4(2) thereof. During the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2007, approximately 1,000 and 493,000 shares of Common Stock were issued in exchange for common OP Units. During the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2007, zero and 900 shares of Common Stock were issued in exchange for preferred OP Units, respectively.

 

The following table summarizes repurchases of our equity securities in the quarter ended December 31, 2007(1):

 

 

 

 

Our Credit Agreement includes customary covenants, including a restriction on dividends and other restricted payments, but permits dividends during any four consecutive fiscal quarters in an aggregate amount of up to 95% of our Funds From Operations for such period or such amount as may be necessary to maintain our REIT status.

 

The following graph compares cumulative total returns for our Common Stock, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Total Return Index (the “S&P 500”), the NASDAQ Composite, the SNL REIT Residential Index and the MSCI US REIT Index. The SNL REIT Residential Index was prepared by SNL Securities, an independent research and publishing firm specializing in the collection and dissemination of data on the banking, thrift and financial services industries. The MSCI US REIT Index is published by Morgan Stanley Capital International Inc., a provider of equity indices. The indices are weighted for all companies that fit the definitional criteria of the particular index and are calculated to exclude companies as they are acquired and add them to the index calculation as they become

publicly traded companies. All companies of the definitional criteria in existence at the point in time presented are included in the index calculations. The graph assumes the investment of $100 in our Common Stock and in each index on December 31, 2002, and that all dividends paid have been reinvested. The historical information set forth below is not necessarily indicative of future performance.

 

 

 

Source: (other than with respect to S&P 500) SNL Financial LC, Charlottesville, VA^©2008.

 

The Performance Graph will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing by the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates the same by reference.

 

The following selected financial data is based on our audited historical financial statements. This information should be read in conjunction with such financial statements, including the notes thereto, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included herein or in previous filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

 

 

 

We are a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT, engaged in the ownership, acquisition, management and redevelopment of apartment properties. Our property operations are characterized by diversification of product, location and price point. As of December 31, 2007, we owned or managed 1,169 apartment properties containing 203,040 units located in 46 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. Our primary sources of income and cash are rents associated with apartment leases.

 

The key financial indicators that we use in managing our business and in evaluating our financial condition and operating performance are: NAV; Funds From Operations, or FFO; FFO less spending for Capital Replacements, or AFFO; same store property operating results; net operating income; net operating income less spending for Capital Replacements, or Free Cash Flow; financial coverage ratios; and leverage as shown on our balance sheet. FFO and Capital Replacement are defined and further described in the sections captioned “Funds From Operations” and “Capital Expenditures” below. The key macro-economic factors and non-financial indicators that affect our financial condition and operating performance are: rates of job growth; single-family and multifamily housing starts; and interest rates.

 

Because our operating results depend primarily on income from our properties, the supply and demand for apartments influences our operating results. Additionally, the level of expenses required to operate and maintain our properties, the pace and price at which we redevelop, acquire and dispose of our apartment properties, and the volume and timing of fee transactions affect our operating results. Our cost of capital is affected by the conditions in the capital and credit markets and the terms that we negotiate for our equity and debt financings.

 

Our focus in 2007 has been to enhance operations to improve and sustain resident satisfaction; obtain rate and occupancy increases to improve profitability; upgrade the quality of our portfolio through portfolio management, capital replacement, capital improvement and redevelopment; increase efficiency through improved business processes and automation; improve liquidity through balance sheet management; expand our asset management business and transactions activity; and minimize our cost of capital. We believe that our efforts are having their intended effect, and have resulted in positive operating results and built the foundation for improved long-term operating results. These initiatives and others have also resulted in improved asset quality, and we will continue to seek opportunities to reinvest in our properties through capital expenditures and to manage our portfolio through property sales and acquisitions.

 

For 2008, our focus will continue to include the following: enhance operations to improve and sustain resident satisfaction; obtain rate and occupancy increases to improve profitability; upgrade the quality of our portfolio through portfolio management, capital replacement, capital improvement and redevelopment; increase efficiency through improved business processes and automation; improve balance sheet flexibility; expand the use of tax credit equity to generate fees and finance redevelopment of affordable properties; and minimize our cost of capital.

 

The following discussion and analysis of the results of our operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with the accompanying financial statements in Item 8.

 

 

 

We reported net income of $29.9 million and net loss attributable to common stockholders of $36.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to net income of $176.8 million and net income attributable to common stockholders of $95.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, decreases of $146.9 million and $131.8 million, respectively. These decreases were principally due to the following items, all of which are discussed in further detail below:

 

 

 

The effects of these items on our operating results were partially offset by an increase in net operating income associated with property operations, reflecting improved operations of our same store properties and other properties.

 

We reported net income of $176.8 million and net income attributable to common stockholders of $95.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to net income of $71.0 million and net loss attributable to common stockholders of $17.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, increases of $105.8 million and $112.7 million, respectively. These increases were principally due to the following items, all of which are discussed in further detail within this section:

 

 

These increases were partially offset by:

 

 

Our reported operating results for 2006 were affected significantly by our adoption ofEITF 04-5,as discussed in Adoption ofEITF 04-5in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8. In accordance with the requirements ofEITF 04-5,we consolidated 156 previously unconsolidated entities as of January 1, 2006. The consolidation of these entities contributed to increases in the reported amounts of certain revenue and expenses.

 

The following paragraphs discuss these and other items affecting the results of our operations in more detail.

 

We have two reportable segments: real estate (owning, operating and redeveloping apartments) and asset management (providing asset management and investment services). Our reportable segments changed in 2007 as a result of the reorganization of certain departments and functions. These changes include a realignment of certain of our property management services from the asset management segment to the real estate segment. In addition, the asset management segment was expanded to include certain departments involved in asset acquisitions, dispositions, and other transactional activities. Prior to the reorganization, those departments were considered to be general and administrative functions and were not associated with any operating segment.

 

Our chief operating decision maker is comprised of several members of our executive management team who use several generally accepted industry financial measures to assess the performance of the business, including NAV, Free Cash Flow, net operating income, FFO, and AFFO. The chief operating decision maker emphasizes net operating income as a key measurement of segment profit or loss. Segment net operating income is generally defined as segment revenues less direct segment operating expenses.

 

Our real estate segment involves the ownership and operation of properties that generate rental and other property-related income through the leasing of apartment units. Our real estate segment’s net operating income also

includes income from property management services performed for unconsolidated partnerships and unrelated parties.

 

The following table summarizes our real estate segment’s net operating income for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands):

 

 

Same store operating results is a key indicator we use to assess the performance of our property operations and to understand the period over period operations of a consistent portfolio of properties. We define “consolidated same store” properties as our conventional properties (i) that we manage, (ii) in which our ownership interest exceeds 10%, (iii) the operations of which have been stabilized, and (iv) that have not been sold or classified as held for sale, in each case, throughout all periods presented. The following tables summarize the operations of our consolidated conventional rental property operations:

 

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, consolidated same store net operating income increased $29.6 million, or 4.8%. Revenues increased $49.2 million, or 4.6%, primarily due to higher average rent (up $30 per unit) and a $9.0 million increase in utility reimbursements. Expenses increased by $19.6 million, or 4.4%, primarily due to an $8.5 million increase in employee compensation and related expenses, $3.0 million increases in each of marketing expense and contract service expense, a $2.5 million increase in utilities and a $2.4 million increase in property insurance expense.

 

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to the year ended December 31, 2005, consolidated same store net operating income increased $40.2 million, or 7.8%. Revenues increased $59.8 million, or 6.6%, primarily due to higher occupancy (up 2.0%), higher average rent (up $30 per unit), and a $6.9 million increase in utility reimbursements. Expenses increased by $19.6 million, or 5.1%, primarily due to a $5.9 million increase in administrative expenses, a $5.8 million increase in real estate taxes, a $5.4 million increase in utilities and a $3.8 million increase in insurance.

 

Our asset management segment includes activities related to our owned portfolio of properties as well as services provided to affiliated partnerships. Within our owned portfolio, these activities include strategic capital allocation decisions and portfolio management activities. We provide similar services to affiliated partnerships, together with such other services as property management, asset management, financial management, accounting, investor reporting, property debt financings, tax credit syndication, redevelopment and construction management. The expenses of this segment consist primarily of the costs of departments that perform transactional activities and asset management services. These activities are conducted in part by our taxable subsidiaries, and the related net operating income may be subject to income taxes.

 

Transactions occur on varying timetables; thus, the income varies from period to period. We have affiliated real estate partnerships for which we have identified a pipeline of transactional opportunities. As a result, we view activity fees as a predictable part of our core business strategy. Asset management revenue is from the financial management of partnerships, rather than management of day-to-day property operations. Asset management revenue includes certain fees that were earned in a prior period, but not recognized at that time because collectibility was not reasonably assured. Those fees may be recognized in a subsequent period upon occurrence of a transaction or a high level of the probability of occurrence of a transaction within twelve months, or improvement in operations that generates sufficient cash to pay the fees.

 

The following table summarizes the net operating income from our asset management segment for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands):

 

For the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, net operating income from activity fees and asset management increased $19.1 million, or 60.5%. This increase is primarily attributable to a $9.6 million increase in promote income, an $8.6 million increase in asset management fees and an increase of $9.1 million in revenues associated with our affordable housing tax credit syndication business, including syndication fees and other revenue earned in connection with these arrangements. These increases were partially offset by an increase in expenses and a decrease in other transaction fees.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to the year ended December 31, 2005, net operating income from activity fees and asset management increased $13.5 million, or 75.0%. This increase is primarily attributable to growth in our affordable housing tax credit syndication business, including a $4.3 million increase in syndication fees and a $4.6 million increase in other revenue earned in connection with these arrangements. The increase also reflects a $2.4 million increase in promote distributions from partnerships.

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, depreciation and amortization increased $35.1 million, or 7.7%. This increase reflects depreciation of $23.7 million for newly acquired properties, completed redevelopments and other capital projects recently placed in service. Depreciation also increased by approximately $8.6 million as a result of depreciation adjustments necessary to reduce the carrying amount of buildings and improvements to their estimated disposition value or to zero in connection with a planned demolition (see Capital Expenditures and Related Depreciation in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8).

 

For the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to the year ended December 31, 2005, depreciation and amortization increased $80.2 million, or 21.5%. This increase was principally due to $31.0 million of depreciation for newly consolidated properties, particularly properties that were consolidated in 2006 in connection with the adoption ofEITF 04-5(see Adoption ofEITF 04-5in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8) and $44.4 million of depreciation related to assets recently placed in service, including acquired properties, redevelopment projects and other capital expenditures. Additionally, a $4.8 million increase resulted from a change effective July 1, 2005 in estimated useful lives that apply to capitalized payroll and certain indirect costs (see Capital Expenditures and Related Depreciation in Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements in Item 8).

 

For the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, general and administrative expenses decreased $0.9 million, or 1.0%. This decrease is primarily due to a reduction in variable compensation, partially offset by an increase in salaries and benefits (net of capitalization) related to additional redevelopment personnel and an increase in director compensation resulting from the addition of two new board members.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to the year ended December 31, 2005, general and administrative expenses increased $7.1 million, or 8.6%. This increase reflects a $9.6 million increase in employee compensation and related costs, including higher stock-based compensation and variable compensation based on achievement of established performance targets. The increase was partially offset by a $3.9 million decrease in legal, audit and consulting expenses.

 

Other expenses (income), net includes the income tax provision/benefit, franchise taxes, risk management activities, partnership administration expenses and certain non-recurring items.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, other expenses (income), net changed favorably by $7.6 million. The net favorable change reflects an $8.7 million increase in income tax benefits related to losses of our taxable subsidiaries, a $2.9 million charge recorded in 2006 related to the valuation of the High Performance Units (see Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8) and a

$1.7 million charge for one-time benefits to certain employees terminated in 2006 that did not recur in 2007. Other expenses (income), net for the year ended December 31, 2007, also includes $3.6 million related to the transfer of certain property rights to an unrelated party. These favorable changes were partially offset by unfavorable changes related our self insurance activities, including a $7.9 million increase in claims on our consolidated properties in excess of reimbursements from third parties, and the settlement of certain litigation matters which resulted in a $2.5 million unfavorable change during the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to the year ended December 31, 2005, other expenses (income), net changed unfavorably by $10.4 million. This decrease was primarily attributable to a $4.2 million decrease in the income tax benefit for our continuing operations, reflecting smaller losses of our taxable subsidiaries, an increase of $3.3 million in partnership expenses resulting from properties newly consolidated in 2006, and a $2.9 million charge recorded in 2006 related to the valuation of the High Performance Units (see Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8).

 

Interest income consists primarily of interest on notes receivable from non-affiliates and unconsolidated real estate partnerships, interest on cash and restricted cash accounts, and accretion of discounts on certain notes receivable from unconsolidated real estate partnerships. Transactions that result in accretion occur infrequently and thus accretion income may vary from period to period.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, interest income increased $8.5 million, or 25.0%. This increase is primarily due to $5.9 million of interest income earned during 2007 on loans collateralized by properties in West Harlem in New York City, which were funded in November 2006, and an increase in interest income earned on escrowed funds related to a tax exempt bond financing transaction and certain property sales during 2007.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2006, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2005, interest income increased $2.6 million, or 8.1%. This increase reflects $8.0 million in interest income on cash and restricted cash balances of newly consolidated properties, particularly properties consolidated as a result of adoptingEITF 04-5in 2006 (see Adoption ofEITF 04-5in Note 2 the consolidated financial statements in Item 8). The increase also reflects a $4.6 million increase in interest income related to increased balances of notes receivable from non-affiliates (see Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8) and $4.2 million of accretion income in connection with two property sales in 2006. These increases were largely offset by the elimination of $14.0 million in interest income on notes receivable from real estate partnerships that were consolidated in 2006 in connection with the adoption ofEITF 04-5.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, interest expense, which includes the amortization of deferred financing costs, increased $30.7 million, or 7.8%. Interest on property debt increased $33.8 million primarily due to higher balances resulting from refinancing activities and mortgage loans on newly acquired properties, offset by lower weighted average rates. Corporate interest increased by $3.1 million as a result of higher weighted average rates and a higher average balance during the year ended December 31, 2007. These increases were partially offset by a $6.2 million increase in capitalized interest related to increased levels of redevelopment and entitlement activities.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to the year ended December 31, 2005, interest expense, which includes the amortization of deferred financing costs, increased $60.7 million, or 18.4%. This increase reflects $28.4 million in interest expense of newly consolidated properties, particularly those consolidated as a result of adoptingEITF 04-5in 2006 (see Adoption ofEITF 04-5in Note 2 the consolidated financial statements in Item 8). Additionally, interest expense on property debt increased by $33.9 million due to higher interest rates on variable rate loans, higher average balances related to refinancings and acquisitions. Corporate interest increased by $1.8 million as a result of higher weighted average rates and a higher average balance during the year ended December 31, 2006. These increases were partially offset by a $6.8 million increase in capitalized interest, related to increased levels of redevelopment and entitlement activities.

 

When real estate partnerships that are consolidated in our financial statements disburse cash to partners in excess of the carrying amount of the minority interest, we record a charge equal to the excess amount, even though there is no economic effect or cost.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, deficit distributions to minority partners increased $18.3 million, or 88.2%. This increase reflects higher levels of distributions to minority interests in 2007, including several large distributions in connection with debt refinancing transactions.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to the year ended December 31, 2005, deficit distributions to minority partners increased $9.3 million, or 80.8%. This increase reflects higher levels of distributions to minority interests in 2006, including several large distributions in connection with debt refinancing transactions.

 

Gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate and other includes our share of gains related to dispositions of real estate by unconsolidated real estate partnerships, gains on dispositions of land and other non-depreciable assets and costs related to asset disposal activities. For the year ended December 31, 2007, gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate and other also includes a gain on extinguishment of debt. Changes in the level of gains recognized from period to period reflect the changing level of disposition activity from period to period. Additionally, gains on properties sold are determined on an individual property basis or in the aggregate for a group of properties that are sold in a single transaction, and are not comparable period to period.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate and other increased $4.9 million, or 18.4%. This increase is primarily related to a $19.4 million gain on debt extinguishment related to seven properties in the VMS partnership (see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8) and the recognition of $7.2 million of non-refundable fees and deposits related to certain property transactions (see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8) in 2007 relative to net gains of $26.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2006, on the sale of parcels of land, interests in unconsolidated real estate properties and an interest in an unconsolidated joint venture that owned and operated several student housing properties.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2006, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2005, gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate and other increased $9.7 million. This increase is primarily attributable to an $11.0 million gain on the disposition of our interest in an unconsolidated joint venture that owned and operated several student housing properties.

 

Minority interest in consolidated real estate partnerships reflects minority partners’ share of operating results of consolidated real estate partnerships. This generally includes the minority partners’ share of property management fees, interest on notes and other amounts eliminated in consolidation that we charge to such partnerships. However, we generally do not recognize a benefit for the minority interest share of partnership losses for partnerships that have deficits in partners’ equity.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, minority interest in consolidated real estate partnerships changed favorably by $10.3 million. This change is primarily attributable to our revised accounting treatment for tax credit arrangements (seeTax Credit Arrangements in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8) which resulted in the reversal in 2006 of a previously recognized benefit of $9.0 million for losses of tax credit partnerships that were allocated to minority interests in prior years, but which are absorbed by us under our revised accounting treatment. This favorable change was in addition to a net decrease in the minority interest share of other real estate partnership losses.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to the year ended December 31, 2005, minority interest in consolidated real estate partnerships changed unfavorably by $17.2 million. This change is primarily attributable to our recognition of $24.6 million for minority partners’ share of losses of partnerships with deficits in equity as a

result of adoptingEITF 04-5in 2006 (see Adoption ofEITF 04-5in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8). The change also reflects differences related to our revised accounting treatment for tax credit arrangements (see Tax Credit Arrangements in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8), including (i) the reversal in 2006 of a previously recognized benefit of $9.0 million for losses of tax credit partnerships that were allocated to minority interests in prior years, but which are absorbed by us under our revised accounting treatment and (ii) a $6.7 million benefit recognized in 2005 for losses allocated to minority interests in tax credit partnerships, while no comparable amount was recognized in 2006 under our revised accounting treatment. These unfavorable changes were partially offset by a $23.1 million net increase in the minority interest share of other real estate partnership losses.

 

The results of operations for properties sold during the period or designated as held for sale at the end of the period are generally required to be classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented. The components of net earnings that are classified as discontinued operations include all property-related revenues and operating expenses, depreciation expense recognized prior to the classification as held for sale, property-specific interest expense and debt extinguishment gains and losses to the extent there is secured debt on the property, and any related minority interest. In addition, any impairment losses on assets held for sale and the net gain or loss on the eventual disposal of properties held for sale are reported in discontinued operations.

 

For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, income from discontinued operations, net totaled $78.0 million, $219.3 million and $95.1 million, respectively. The $141.3 million decrease in income from discontinued operations from 2006 to 2007 was principally due to a $194.5 million decrease in gain on dispositions of real estate, net of minority partners’ interests and a $19.5 million decrease in operating income, offset by a $22.9 million decrease in interest expense, a $30.8 million favorable change in income tax arising from disposals and a $22.9 million gain on extinguishment of debt related to mortgage loans secured by the eight VMS properties sold to third parties during 2007 (see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8). The $124.2 million increase in income from discontinued operations from 2005 to 2006 was principally due to a $155.0 million increase in gain on dispositions of real estate, net of minority partners’ interests, a $26.4 million decrease in interest expense and an impairment recovery of $0.4 million in 2006 versus an impairment charge of $3.8 million in 2005, offset by a $23.7 million decrease in operating income, a $28.4 million increase in income tax arising from disposals and a $12.6 million increase in minority interest in the Aimco Operating Partnership.

 

During 2007, we sold 73 consolidated properties, resulting in a net gain on sale of approximately $63.2 million (which is net of $2.1 million of related income taxes). Additionally, we recognized $0.1 million in impairment recoveries on assets sold in 2007 and $0.4 million of net recoveries of deficit distributions to minority partners. During 2006, we sold 77 consolidated properties and the South Tower of the Flamingo South Beach property, resulting in a net gain on sale of approximately $226.9 million (which is net of $32.9 million of related income taxes). Additionally, we recognized $0.4 million in impairment recoveries on assets sold in 2006 and $15.7 million of net recoveries of deficit distributions to minority partners. During 2005, we sold 83 consolidated properties, resulting in a net gain on sale of approximately $100.3 million (which is net of $4.5 million of related income taxes). Additionally, we recognized $3.8 million in impairment losses on assets sold or held for sale in 2005 and $14.5 million of net recoveries of deficit distributions to minority partners. For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, income from discontinued operations includes the operating results of the properties sold during these years as well the operating results of three properties classified as held for sale at December 31, 2007.

 

Changes in the level of gains recognized from period to period reflect the changing level of our disposition activity from period to period. Additionally, gains on properties sold are determined on an individual property basis or in the aggregate for a group of properties that are sold in a single transaction, and are not comparable period to period (see Note 13 of the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for additional information on discontinued operations).

 

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, which requires us to make estimates and assumptions. We believe that the

following critical accounting policies involve our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

 

Real estate and other long-lived assets to be held and used are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization, unless the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable. If events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a property may not be recoverable, we make an assessment of its recoverability by comparing the carrying amount to our estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest charges, of the property. If the carrying amount exceeds the aggregate undiscounted future cash flows, we recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the property.

 

From time to time, we have non-revenue producing properties that we hold for future redevelopment. We assess the recoverability of the carrying amount of these redevelopment properties by comparing our estimate of undiscounted future cash flows based on the expected service potential of the redevelopment property upon completion to the carrying amount. In certain instances, we use a probability-weighted approach to determine our estimate of undiscounted future cash flows when alternative courses of action are under consideration.

 

At December 31, 2007, we evaluated our Lincoln Place property in Venice, CA and determined that the carrying amount of $189.3 million was recoverable based on our probability-weighted assessment of undiscounted cash flows. Plans to develop Lincoln Place have been the subject of controversy and litigation, which reduces its market value and may result in a future impairment.

 

Real estate investments are subject to varying degrees of risk. Several factors may adversely affect the economic performance and value of our real estate investments. These factors include:

 

 

Any adverse changes in these and other factors could cause an impairment in our long-lived assets, including real estate and investments in unconsolidated real estate partnerships. Based on periodic tests of recoverability of long-lived assets, for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2005, we recorded net impairment losses of $6.6 million and $6.1 million, respectively, related to properties to be held and used. For the year ended December 31, 2006, we recorded net recoveries of previously recorded impairment losses of $0.8 million.

 

Notes receivable from unconsolidated real estate partnerships consist primarily of notes receivable from partnerships in which we are the general partner. Notes receivable from non-affiliates consists of notes receivable from unrelated third parties. The ultimate repayment of these notes is subject to a number of variables, including the performance and value of the underlying real estate and the claims of unaffiliated mortgage lenders. Our notes receivable include loans extended by us that we carry at the face amount plus accrued interest, which we refer to as “par value notes,” and loans extended by predecessors, some of whose positions we generally acquired at a discount, which we refer to as “discounted notes.”

We record interest income on par value notes as earned in accordance with the terms of the related loan agreements. We discontinue the accrual of interest on such notes when the notes are impaired, as discussed below, or when there is otherwise significant uncertainty as to the collection of interest. We record income on such nonaccrual loans using the cost recovery method, under which we apply cash receipts first to the recorded amount of the loan; thereafter, any additional receipts are recognized as income.

 

We recognize interest income on discounted notes receivable based upon whether the amount and timing of collections are both probable and reasonably estimable. We consider collections to be probable and reasonably estimable when the borrower has entered into certain closed or pending transactions (which include real estate sales, refinancings, foreclosures and rights offerings) that provide a reliable source of repayment. In such instances, we recognize accretion income, on a prospective basis using the effective interest method over the estimated remaining term of the loans, equal to the difference between the carrying amount of the discounted notes and the estimated collectible value. We record income on all other discounted notes using the cost recovery method. Accretion income recognized in any given period is based on our ability to complete transactions to monetize the notes receivable and the difference between the carrying value and the estimated collectible value of the notes; therefore, accretion income varies on a period by period basis and could be lower or higher than in prior periods.

 

 

We assess the collectibility of notes receivable on a periodic basis, which assessment consists primarily of an evaluation of cash flow projections of the borrower to determine whether estimated cash flows are sufficient to repay principal and interest in accordance with the contractual terms of the note. We recognize impairments on notes receivable when it is probable that principal and interest will not be received in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan. The amount of the impairment to be recognized generally is based on the fair value of the partnership’s real estate that represents the primary source of loan repayment. In certain instances where other sources of cash flow are available to repay the loan, the impairment is measured by discounting the estimated cash flows at the loan’s original effective interest rate.

 

During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, we recorded net provisions for losses on notes receivable of $4.0 million and $2.8 million, respectively, and during the year ended December 31, 2005, we recorded net recoveries of previously recorded provisions for losses on notes receivable of $1.4 million. We will continue to evaluate the collectibility of these notes, and we will adjust related allowances in the future due to changes in market conditions and other factors.

 

 

We capitalize costs, including certain indirect costs, incurred in connection with our capital expenditure activities, including redevelopment and construction projects, other tangible property improvements, and replacements of existing property components. Included in these capitalized costs are payroll costs associated with time spent by site employees in connection with the planning, execution and control of all capital expenditure activities at the property level. We characterize as “indirect costs” an allocation of certain department costs, including payroll, at the regional operating center and corporate levels that clearly relate to capital expenditure activities. We capitalize interest, property taxes and insurance during periods in which redevelopment and construction projects are in progress. Costs incurred in connection with capital expenditure activities are capitalized where the costs of the improvements or replacements exceed $250. We charge to expense as incurred costs that do not relate to capital expenditure activities, including ordinary repairs, maintenance, resident turnover costs and general and administrative expenses (seeCapital Expenditures and Related Depreciation in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8).

 

For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, for continuing and discontinued operations, we capitalized $30.8 million, $24.7 million and $18.1 million, respectively, of interest costs, and $78.1 million, $66.2 million and $53.3 million, respectively, of site payroll and indirect costs, respectively.

 

FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure that we believe, when considered with the financial statements determined in accordance with GAAP, is helpful to investors in understanding our performance because it captures features particular to real estate performance by recognizing that real estate generally appreciates over time or maintains residual value to a much greater extent than do other depreciable assets such as machinery, computers or other personal property. The Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, defines FFO as net income (loss), computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains from sales of depreciable property, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis. We compute FFO for all periods presented in accordance with the guidance set forth by NAREIT’s April 1, 2002, White Paper, which we refer to as the White Paper. We calculate FFO (diluted) by subtracting redemption related preferred stock issuance costs and dividends on preferred stock and adding back dividends/distributions on dilutive preferred securities and interest expense on dilutive mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred securities. FFO should not be considered an alternative to net income or net cash flows from operating activities, as determined in accordance with GAAP, as an indication of our performance or as a measure of liquidity. FFO is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund future cash needs. In addition, although FFO is a measure used for comparability in assessing the performance of real estate investment trusts, there can be no assurance that our basis for computing FFO is comparable with that of other real estate investment trusts.

 

For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, our FFO is calculated as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

Notes:

 

 

 

Liquidity is the ability to meet present and future financial obligations either through the sale or maturity of existing assets or by the acquisition of additional funds through working capital management. Both the coordination of asset and liability maturities and effective working capital management are important to the maintenance of liquidity. Our primary source of liquidity is cash flow from our operations. Additional sources are proceeds from property sales and proceeds from refinancings of existing mortgage loans and borrowings under new mortgage loans.

 

Our principal uses for liquidity include normal operating activities, payments of principal and interest on outstanding debt, capital expenditures, dividends paid to stockholders and distributions paid to partners, repurchases of shares of our Common Stock, and acquisitions of, and investments in, properties. We use our cash and cash equivalents and our cash provided by operating activities to meet short-term liquidity needs. In the event that our cash and cash equivalents and our cash provided by operating activities is not sufficient to cover our short-term liquidity demands, we have additional means, such as short-term borrowing availability and proceeds from property sales and refinancings, to help us meet our short-term liquidity demands. We use our revolving credit facility for general corporate purposes and to fund investments on an interim basis. We expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements, such as debt maturities and property acquisitions, through long-term borrowings, both secured and unsecured, the issuance of debt or equity securities (including OP Units), the sale of properties and cash generated from operations.

 

At December 31, 2007, we had $210.5 million in cash and cash equivalents, a decrease of $19.4 million from December 31, 2006. At December 31, 2007, we had $319.0 million of restricted cash, primarily consisting of reserves and escrows held by lenders for bond sinking funds, capital expenditures, property taxes and insurance. In addition, cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash are held by partnerships that are not presented on a consolidated

basis. The following discussion relates to changes in cash due to operating, investing and financing activities, which are presented in our consolidated statements of cash flows in Item 8.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2007, our net cash provided by operating activities of $465.5 million was primarily from operating income from our consolidated properties, which is affected primarily by rental rates, occupancy levels and operating expenses related to our portfolio of properties. Cash provided by operating activities decreased $53.4 million compared with the year ended December 31, 2006, driven by cash from changes in operating assets and liabilities of $12.6 million in 2007 compared to $65.7 million in 2006.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2007, our net cash used in investing activities of $271.6 million primarily resulted from investments in our existing real estate assets through capital spending as well as the acquisition of 16 properties and purchases of interests in real estate partnerships (see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for further information on acquisitions), partially offset by proceeds received from the sales of properties and the sales of partnership interests.

 

Although we hold all of our properties for investment, we sell properties when they do not meet our investment criteria or are located in areas that we believe do not justify our continued investment when compared to alternative uses for our capital. During the year ended December 31, 2007, we sold 73 consolidated properties for an aggregate sales price of $493.5 million, generating proceeds totaling $431.9 million after the payment of transaction costs and the buyers’ assumption of debt. Sales proceeds were used to repay property level debt, repay borrowings under our revolving credit facility, repurchase shares of our Common Stock and for other corporate purposes.

 

We are currently marketing for sale certain properties that are inconsistent with our long-term investment strategy. Additionally, from time to time, we may market certain properties that are consistent with our long-term investment strategy but offer attractive returns. We plan to use our share of the net proceeds from such dispositions to reduce debt, fund capital expenditures on existing assets, fund property and partnership acquisitions, repurchase shares of our Common Stock, and for other operating needs and corporate purposes.

 

We classify all capital spending as Capital Replacements (which we refer to as CR), Capital Improvements (which we refer to as CI), casualties, redevelopment or entitlement. Expenditures other than casualty, redevelopment and entitlement capital expenditures are apportioned between CR and CI based on the useful life of the capital item under consideration and the period we have owned the property.

 

CR represents the share of capital expenditures that are deemed to replace the portion of acquired capital assets that was consumed during the period we have owned the asset. CI represents the share of expenditures that are made to enhance the value, profitability or useful life of an asset as compared to its original purchase condition. CR and CI excludes capital expenditures for casualties, redevelopment and entitlements. Casualty expenditures represent capitalized costs incurred in connection with casualty losses and are associated with the restoration of the asset. A portion of the restoration costs may be reimbursed by insurance carriers subject to deductibles associated with each loss. Redevelopment expenditures represent expenditures that substantially upgrade the property. Entitlement expenditures represent costs incurred in connection with obtaining local governmental approvals to increase density and add residential units to a site. For the year ended December 31, 2007, we spent a total of $102.6 million, $123.7 million, $12.7 million, $352.8 million and $26.3 million on CR, CI, casualties, redevelopment and entitlement, respectively.

 

The table below details our share of actual spending, on both consolidated and unconsolidated real estate partnerships, for CR, CI, casualties, redevelopment and entitlements for the year ended December 31, 2007, on a total dollar basis. Per unit numbers for CR and CI are based on approximately 132,862 average units for the year including 115,046 conventional units and 17,817 affordable units. Average units are weighted for the portion of the period that we owned an interest in the property, represent ownership-adjusted effective units, and exclude non-

managed units. Total capital expenditures are reconciled to our consolidated statement of cash flows for the same period (in thousands, except per unit amounts).

 

 

Included in the above spending for CI, casualties, redevelopment and entitlement, was approximately $68.1 million of our share of capitalized site payroll and indirect costs related to these activities for the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

We funded all of the above capital expenditures with cash provided by operating activities, working capital, property sales and borrowings under our Credit Facility, as discussed below.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2007, net cash used in financing activities of $213.3 million primarily related to repayments of property loans, distributions to minority interests, payment of common and preferred dividends, repurchases of Common Stock and redemption of the Class W Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock. Proceeds from property loans and stock option exercises partially offset the cash outflow.

 

At December 31, 2007 and 2006, we had $7.0 billion and $6.3 billion, respectively, in consolidated mortgage debt outstanding, which included $11.6 million and $239.2 million, respectively, of mortgage debt classified within liabilities related to assets held for sale. During the year ended December 31, 2007, we refinanced or closed mortgage loans on 144 consolidated properties generating $1,795.5 million of proceeds from borrowings with a

weighted average interest rate of 6.09%. Our share of the net proceeds after repayment of existing debt, payment of transaction costs and distributions to limited partners, was $864.2 million. We used these total net proceeds for capital expenditures and other corporate purposes. We intend to continue to refinance mortgage debt to generate proceeds in amounts exceeding our scheduled amortizations and maturities, generally not to increase loan-to-value, but as a means to monetize asset appreciation.

 

We have an Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit Agreement with a syndicate of financial institutions, which we refer to as the Credit Agreement.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2007, we amended various terms in our Credit Agreement which included (i) an increase in aggregate commitments; (ii) a modification of the capitalization rate used in the calculation of certain financial covenants; (iii) a modification to permit proceeds of loans under the Credit Agreement to be used to repurchase equity interests of the borrowers, including our Common Stock, and provide that the purchase of such equity interests is not restricted as long as no default or event of default under the Credit Agreement exists; and (iv) elimination of the limitation on incurrence of indebtedness that is pari passu with the Credit Agreement.

 

The Credit Agreement was expanded from total commitments of $850.0 million to $1.125 billion. Prior to the amendments, the Credit Agreement was comprised of $400.0 million in term loans and $450.0 million of revolving loan commitments. In connection with the amendments, we obtained an additional term loan of $75.0 million with a one year term and pricing equal to LIBOR plus 1.375%, or a base rate at our option, and additional revolving loan commitments totaling $200.0 million with the same maturity and pricing as the existing revolving loan commitments. We may extend the $75.0 million term loan for one year, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions including the payment of a 12.5 basis point fee on the amount of the term loan then outstanding. We are also permitted to increase the aggregate commitments (which may be revolving or term loan commitments) by an amount not to exceed $175.0 million, subject to receipt of commitments from lenders and other customary conditions.

 

At December 31, 2007, the term loans had an outstanding principal balance of $475.0 million and a weighted average interest rate of 6.38%. At December 31, 2007, the revolving loan commitments were $650.0 million and had no outstanding principal balance. The amount available under the revolving loan commitments at December 31, 2007, was $606.5 million (after giving effect to $43.5 million outstanding for undrawn letters of credit issued under the revolving loan commitments).

 

On December 21, 2007, our Board of Directors declared a special dividend of $2.51 per share payable on January 30, 2008 to holders of record of our Common Stock on December 31, 2007. Stockholders had the option to elect to receive payment of the special dividend in cash, shares or a combination of cash and shares, except that the aggregate amount of cash payable to all stockholders in the special dividend was limited to $55.0 million plus cash paid in lieu of fractional shares. The special dividend, totaling $232.9 million, was paid on 92,795,891 shares issued and outstanding on the record date, which included 416,140 shares held by certain of our consolidated subsidiaries. Approximately $177.9 million of the special dividend was paid through the issuance of 4,594,074 shares of Common Stock (including 20,339 shares issued to consolidated subsidiaries holding our shares), which was determined based on the average closing price of our Common Stock on January23-24, 2008, or $38.71 per share.

 

After elimination of the effect of shares held by consolidated subsidiaries, the special dividend totaled $231.9 million. Approximately $177.1 million of the special dividend was paid through the issuance of 4,573,735 shares of Common Stock (excluding 20,339 shares issued to our consolidated subsidiaries) to holders of 92,379,751 shares of our Common Stock on the record date (excluding 416,140 shares held by certain of our consolidated subsidiaries), representing an increase of approximately 4.95% to the then outstanding shares. The effect of the issuance of additional shares of Common Stock pursuant to the special dividend has been retroactively reflected in each of the historical periods presented as if those shares were issued and outstanding at the beginning of

the earliest period presented; accordingly all activity including share issuances, repurchases and forfeitures have been adjusted to reflect the 4.95% increase in the number of shares, except in limited instances where noted.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2007, we redeemed all outstanding shares of our privately held 8.1% Class W Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock for an aggregate redemption price of approximately $102.0 million, excluding accrued and unpaid dividends through the date of redemption (seePreferred Stock in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for additional information about our preferred stock transactions during 2007).

 

Under our shelf registration statement, as of December 31, 2007, we had available for issuance approximately $877.0 million of debt and equity securities and the Aimco Operating Partnership had available for issuance $500.0 million of debt securities. At January 30, 2008, following the issuance of additional shares of Common Stock pursuant to the special dividend discussed above, we had available for issuance approximately $699.1 million of debt and equity securities.

 

Our Board of Directors has, from time to time, authorized us to repurchase shares of our outstanding capital stock. During the year ended December 31, 2007, we repurchased approximately 7.5 million shares of Common Stock (7.8 million shares after the effect of the special dividend) for approximately $325.8 million. As of December 31, 2007, we were authorized to repurchase approximately 8.2 million additional shares of our Common Stock under an authorization that has no expiration date. On January 29, 2008, our Board of Directors increased the number of shares authorized for repurchase by 25.0 million shares. Between January 1, 2008 and February 15, 2008, we repurchased approximately 5.1 million shares of Common Stock for approximately $170.6 million, or $33.67 per share. Future repurchases may be made from time to time in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions.

 

This table summarizes information contained elsewhere in this Annual Report regarding payments due under contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2007 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

 

In addition, we may enter into commitments to purchase goods and services in connection with the operations of our properties. Those commitments generally have terms of one year or less and reflect expenditure levels comparable to our historical expenditures.

 

In addition to the items set forth in “Contractual Obligations” above, we expect to fund any future acquisitions, additional redevelopment projects and capital improvements principally with proceeds from property sales (including tax-free exchange proceeds), short-term borrowings, debt and equity financing (including tax credit equity) and operating cash flows.

In 2008, we expect to invest between $250.0 and $300.0 million in conventional redevelopment projects and we expect to invest approximately $72.0 million in affordable redevelopment projects, predominantly funded by third-party tax credit equity.

 

We own general and limited partner interests in unconsolidated real estate partnerships, in which our total ownership interests range typically from less than 1% up to 50%. However, based on the provisions of the relevant partnership agreements, we are not deemed to be the primary beneficiary or to have control of these partnerships sufficient to require or permit consolidation for accounting purposes (see Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements in Item 8). There are no lines of credit, side agreements, or any other derivative financial instruments related to or between our unconsolidated real estate partnerships and us and no material exposure to financial guarantees. Accordingly, our maximum risk of loss related to these unconsolidated real estate partnerships is limited to the aggregate carrying amount of our investment in the unconsolidated real estate partnerships and any outstanding notes receivable as reported in our consolidated financial statements (see Note 4 of the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for additional information about our investments in unconsolidated real estate partnerships).

 

Our primary market risk exposure relates to changes in interest rates. We are not subject to any foreign currency exchange rate risk or commodity price risk, or any other material market rate or price risks. We use predominantly long-term, fixed-rate non-recourse mortgage debt in order to avoid the refunding and repricing risks of short-term borrowings. We use short-term debt financing and working capital primarily to fund short-term uses and acquisitions and generally expect to refinance such borrowings with cash from operating activities, property sales proceeds, long-term debt or equity financings.

 

We had $1,754.4 million of floating rate debt outstanding at December 31, 2007. Of the total floating rate debt, the major components were floating rate tax-exempt bond financing ($698.4 million), floating rate secured notes ($572.5 million), and term loans ($475.0 million). Historically, changes in tax-exempt interest rates have been at a ratio of less than 1:1 with changes in taxable interest rates. Floating rate tax-exempt bond financing is benchmarked against the SIFMA rate (previously the Bond Market Association index), which since 1981 has averaged 68% of the30-day LIBOR rate. If this relationship continues, an increase in30-day LIBOR of 1.0% (0.68% in tax-exempt interest rates) would result in our income before minority interests and cash flows being reduced by $15.3 million on an annual basis. This would be offset by variable rate interest income earned on certain assets, including cash and cash equivalents and notes receivable, as well as interest that is capitalized on a portion of this variable rate debt incurred in connection with our redevelopment activities. Considering these offsets, the same increase in30-day LIBOR would result in our income before minority interests and cash flows being reduced by $6.5 million on an annual basis. Comparatively, if30-day LIBOR had increased by 1% in 2006, our income before minority interests and cash flows, after considering such offsets would have been reduced by $8.5 million on an annual basis. The potential reduction of income before minority interests was higher in 2007 as compared to 2006 primarily due to higher floating rate balances resulting from refinancing of certain fixed rate mortgages and increases in our use of total rate of return swaps to effectively convert higher fixed rate debt to lower variable rates benchmarked against the BMA index (see Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for further discussion of total rate of return swaps).

 

We believe that the fair values of our floating rate secured tax-exempt bond debt and floating rate secured long-term debt as of December 31, 2007, approximate their carrying values. The fair value for our fixed-rate debt agreements was estimated based on the market rate for debt with the same or similar terms. The combined carrying amount of our fixed-rate secured tax-exempt bonds and fixed-rate secured notes payable at December 31, 2007 was $5.7 billion compared to the estimated fair value of $5.8 billion (see Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8). If market rates for our fixed-rate debt were higher by 1%, the estimated fair value of our fixed-rate debt would have decreased from $5.8 billion to $5.5 billion. If market rates for our fixed-rate debt were lower by 1%, the estimated fair value of our fixed-rate debt would have increased from $5.8 billion to $6.1 billion.

 

The independent registered public accounting firm’s report, consolidated financial statements and schedule listed in the accompanying index are filed as part of this report and incorporated herein by this reference. See “Index to Financial Statements” onpage F-1of this Annual Report.

 

None.

 

 

Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inRules 13a-15(e)and15d-15(e)under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

 

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined inRule 13a-15(f)and15d-15(f)under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

 

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework.

 

Based on their assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2007, our internal control over financial reporting is effective.

 

Our independent registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting.

 

There have been no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined inRules 13a-15(f)and15d-15(f))under the Exchange Act) during fourth quarter 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

We have audited Apartment Investment and Management Company’s (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

In our opinion, Apartment Investment and Management Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on the COSO criteria.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Apartment Investment and Management Company as of December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, and our report dated February 29, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 

Denver, Colorado

February 29, 2008

 

None.

 

The information required by this item is presented under the captions “Board of Directors and Officers,” “Corporate Governance Matters — Code of Ethics,” “Other Matters — Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” “Corporate Governance Matters — Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee,” “Corporate Governance Matters — Audit Committee,” and “Corporate Governance Matters — Audit Committee Financial Expert” in the proxy statement for our 2008 annual meeting of stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

The information required by this item is presented under the captions “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Compensation and Human Resources Committee Report to Stockholders,” “Summary Compensation Table,” “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2007,” “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End 2007,” “Option Exercises and Stock Vested,” “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control,” and “Corporate Governance Matters — Director Compensation” in the proxy statement for our 2008 annual meeting of stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

The information required by this item is presented under the captions “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans” in the proxy statement for our 2008 annual meeting of stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

The information required by this item is presented under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Corporate Governance Matters — Independence of Directors” in the proxy statement for our 2008 annual meeting of stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

The information required by this item is presented under the caption “Principal Accountant Fees and Services” in the proxy statement for our 2008 annual meeting of stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

(a)(1) The financial statements listed in the Index to Financial Statements onPage F-1of this report are filed as part of this report and incorporated herein by reference.

 

(a)(2) The financial statement schedule listed in the Index to Financial Statements onPage F-1of this report is filed as part of this report and incorporated herein by reference.

 

(a)(3) The Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

 

 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

Terry Considine

Date: February 29, 2008

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.