Associated Banc-Corp - 10-Q quarterly report FY

 

(Mark One)

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ     No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer þ                    Accelerated filer o                    Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o     No þ

The number of shares outstanding of registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, at October 31, 2007, was 127,070,443 shares.

 

 

These interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and, therefore, certain information and footnote disclosures normally presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been omitted or abbreviated. The information contained in the consolidated financial statements and footnotes in Associated Banc-Corp’s 2006 annual report on Form 10-K, should be referred to in connection with the reading of these unaudited interim financial statements.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows of Associated Banc-Corp (individually referred to herein as the “Parent Company,” and together with all of its subsidiaries and affiliates, collectively referred to herein as the “Corporation”) for the periods presented, and all such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all subsidiaries. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and revenues and expenses for the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. Estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change include the determination of the allowance for loan losses, mortgage servicing rights valuation, derivative financial instruments and hedging activities, and income taxes.

Certain amounts in the consolidated financial statements of prior periods have been reclassified to conform with the current period’s presentation. Additionally, the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity for 2006 was modified from the presentation in the annual report on Form 10-K to show the transition adjustment related to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans,” (“SFAS 158”) as a direct component of accumulated other comprehensive income, separate from comprehensive income. Management determined the effect on the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity of this change in presentation was not material to the prior period presented.

In September 2006, the FASB ratified the consensus reached by the EITF in Issue No. 06-5, “Accounting for Purchases of Life Insurance — Determining the Amount That Could Be Realized in Accordance with FASB Technical Bulletin No. 85-4, Accounting for Purchases of Life Insurance,” (“EITF 06-5”). EITF 06-5 concluded that companies purchasing a life insurance policy should record the amount that could be realized, considering any additional amounts beyond cash surrender value included in the contractual terms of the policy. The amount that could be realized should be based on assumed surrender at the individual policy or certificate level, unless all policies or certificates are required to be surrendered as a group. When it is probable that contractual restrictions would limit the amount that could be realized, such contractual limitations should be considered and any amounts recoverable at the insurance company’s discretion should be excluded from the amount that could be realized. Companies are permitted to recognize the effects of applying the consensus through either (1) a change in accounting principle through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings or to other components of equity or net assets as of the beginning of the year of adoption or (2) a change in accounting principle through retrospective application to all prior periods. EITF 06-5 was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Corporation adopted EITF 06-5 at the beginning of 2007 and the adoption did not have a material impact on its results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.

In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Interpretation requires the impact of a tax position to be recognized in the financial statements if that position is more-likely-than-not of being sustained upon examination, based on the technical merits of the position. A tax position meeting the more-likely-than-not threshold is then to be measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. FIN 48 was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Corporation adopted the provisions of FIN 48 effective January 1, 2007, resulting in no cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the date of adoption and determined that the adoption did not have a material impact on its results of operations, financial position, and liquidity. See Note 11 for additional disclosures.

In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140,” (“SFAS 156”). SFAS 156 requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or servicing liability each time it undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a servicing contract. All separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities are to be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. SFAS 156 permits an entity to choose either the amortization method or the fair value measurement method for subsequently measuring each class of separately recognized servicing assets or servicing liabilities. Under the amortization method, servicing assets or servicing liabilities are amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing income or loss and servicing assets or servicing liabilities are assessed for impairment based on fair value at each reporting date. The fair value measurement method measures servicing assets and servicing liabilities at fair value at each reporting date with the changes in fair value recognized in earnings in the period in which the changes occur. SFAS 156 was effective for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. The Corporation adopted SFAS 156 at the beginning of 2007 and the adoption did not have a material impact on its results of operations, financial position, and liquidity. See Note 8 for additional disclosures.

Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share are calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares adjusted for the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and, having a lesser impact, unvested restricted stock and unsettled share repurchases. Presented below are the calculations for basic and diluted earnings per share.

The fair value of stock options granted is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model, while the fair value of restricted stock shares is their fair market value on the date of grant. The fair values of stock awards are amortized as compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the grants. Compensation expense recognized is included in personnel expense in the consolidated statements of income.

Assumptions are used in estimating the fair value of stock options granted. The weighted average expected life of the stock option represents the period of time that stock options are expected to be outstanding and is estimated using historical data of stock option exercises and forfeitures. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Corporation’s stock. The following assumptions were used in estimating the fair value for options granted in the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006:

The Corporation is required to estimate potential forfeitures of stock grants and adjust compensation cost recorded accordingly. The estimate of forfeitures will be adjusted over the requisite service period to the extent that actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from such estimates. Changes in estimated forfeitures will be recognized in the period of change and will also impact the amount of stock compensation expense to be recognized in future periods.

A summary of the Corporation’s stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2006 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, is presented below.

The following table summarizes information about the Corporation’s nonvested stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2006, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and the year ended December 31, 2006, the intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $8.8 million and $14.6 million, respectively. (Intrinsic value represents the amount by which the fair market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the stock option.) For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, the Corporation recognized compensation expense of $1.7 million and $0.7 million, respectively, for the vesting of stock options. For the full year 2006, the Corporation recognized compensation expense of $0.9 million for the vesting of stock options. At September 30, 2007, the Corporation had $4.8 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 27 months.

The following table summarizes information about the Corporation’s restricted stock shares activity for the year ended December 31, 2006, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

The Corporation amortizes the expense related to restricted stock awards as compensation expense over the vesting period. For performance-based restricted stock shares, the Corporation estimates the degree to which performance conditions will be met to determine the number of shares which will vest and the related compensation expense prior to the vesting date. Compensation expense is adjusted in the period such estimates change. At September 30, 2007, there were 25,500 shares of performance-based restricted stock shares that will vest only if certain earnings per share goals and service conditions are achieved. Failure to achieve the goals and service conditions will result in all or a portion of these shares being forfeited.

Expense for restricted stock awards of approximately $1.5 million and $0.7 million was recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, while expense for restricted stock awards of approximately $1.0 million was recognized for the full year 2006. The Corporation had $3.8 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to restricted stock shares at September 30, 2007, that is expected to be recognized over the remaining contractual terms that extend to second quarter 2010.

The Corporation issues shares from treasury, when available, or new shares upon the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock shares. The Board of Directors has authorized management to repurchase shares of the Corporation’s common stock each quarter in the market, to be made available for issuance in connection with the

Corporation’s employee incentive plans and for other corporate purposes. The repurchase of shares will be based on market opportunities, capital levels, growth prospects, and other investment opportunities.

As required, the Corporation’s acquisitions are accounted for under the purchase method of accounting; thus, the results of operations of each acquired entity prior to its respective consummation date are not included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. When valuing acquisitions, the Corporation considers a range of valuation methodologies, including comparable publicly-traded companies, comparable precedent transactions, and discounted cash flow. To record the transaction, the Corporation assigns estimated fair values to the assets acquired, including identifying and measuring acquired intangible assets, and to liabilities assumed (using sources of information such as observable market prices or discounted cash flows). To identify intangible assets that should be measured, the Corporation determines if the asset arose from contractual or other legal rights or if the asset is capable of being separated from the acquired entity. When valuing identified intangible assets, the Corporation generally relies on valuation reports by independent third parties. In each acquisition, the excess cost of the acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired is allocated to goodwill. For the completed acquisition noted below, the resulting purchase price exceeded the value of the net assets acquired.

First National Bank of Hudson (“First National Bank”): On June 1, 2007, the Corporation consummated its acquisition of 100% of the outstanding shares of First National Bank, a $0.4 billion community bank headquartered in Woodbury, Minnesota. The consummation of the transaction included the issuance of approximately 1.3 million shares of common stock and $46.5 million in cash. With the addition of First National Bank’s eight locations, the Corporation expanded its presence in the Greater Twin Cities area. At acquisition, First National Bank added approximately $0.3 billion to both loans and deposits. In June 2007, the Corporation also completed its conversion of First National Bank onto its centralized operating systems and merged it into Associated Bank, National Association.

The acquisition was immaterial to the Corporation’s consolidated financial results. Goodwill of approximately $58 million and a core deposit intangible of approximately $4 million recognized in the transaction at acquisition were assigned to the banking segment. The Corporation relied on a valuation report by an independent third party in valuing the core deposit intangible.

The amortized cost and fair values of investment securities available for sale were as follows.

For the first nine months of 2007, the Corporation recognized gains of $9.0 million on sales of equity securities. Comparatively, net gains on sales of investment securities were $5.2 million and $4.7 million for the first nine months and full year of 2006, respectively. In March 2006, $0.7 billion of investment securities were sold as part of the Corporation’s initiative to reduce wholesale borrowings. Investment securities sales included losses of $15.8 million, offset by gains of $18.3 million on equity security sales, resulting in a net $2.5 million gain for first quarter 2006. While during the remainder of 2006 there were gains realized on equity securities sold and a $2.0 million other-than-temporary impairment write-down (discussed below), there were no other losses on sales of investment securities during 2006. The Corporation does not have a historical pattern of restructuring its balance sheet through large investment reductions. Balance sheet and net interest margin challenges in the first quarter of 2006 led to the targeted sale decision in support of its wholesale funding reduction initiative, and did not change the Corporation’s intent on the remaining investment portfolio.

The following represents gross unrealized losses and the related fair value of investment securities available for sale, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at September 30, 2007.

Management does not believe any individual unrealized loss at September 30, 2007 represents an other-than-temporary impairment. The unrealized losses reported for mortgage-related securities relate primarily to mortgage-backed securities issued by government agencies such as the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”). These unrealized losses are primarily attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit deterioration. The Corporation currently has both the intent and ability to hold the securities contained in the previous table for a time necessary to recover the amortized cost.

At September 30, 2007, the Corporation owned certain preferred stock securities that were determined to have other-than-temporary impairments that resulted in write-downs to earnings in prior years (with no write-downs in 2007) on the related securities. One preferred stock security holding was determined to have an other-than-temporary impairment that resulted in a write-down on the security of $2.0 million during the fourth quarter of 2006 (effectively reducing the carrying value of this preferred stock holding to zero).

For comparative purposes, the following represents gross unrealized losses and the related fair value of investment securities available for sale, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2006.

Goodwill: Goodwill is not amortized, but is subject to impairment tests on at least an annual basis. The Corporation conducts its impairment testing annually in May and no impairment loss was necessary in 2006 or through September 30, 2007. At September 30, 2007, goodwill of $907 million was assigned to the banking segment and goodwill of $22 million was assigned to the wealth management segment. The $58 million increase to goodwill during the first nine months of 2007 was attributable to the June 2007 acquisition of First National Bank. The $6 million reduction to goodwill during 2006 resulted from a $4 million adjustment attributable to finalizing the dissolution of an employee stock ownership plan of a financial services company acquired in October 2005 and a $2 million adjustment to tax liabilities related to the Corporation’s acquisition of a thrift in October 2004. The change in the carrying amount of goodwill was as follows.

Other Intangible Assets: The Corporation has other intangible assets that are amortized, consisting of core deposit intangibles, other intangibles (primarily related to customer relationships acquired in connection with the Corporation’s insurance agency acquisitions), and mortgage servicing rights. The core deposit intangibles and mortgage servicing rights are assigned to the banking segment, while other intangibles of $13 million are assigned to the wealth management segment and $1 million are assigned to the banking segment as of September 30, 2007.

For core deposit intangibles and other intangibles, changes in the gross carrying amount, accumulated amortization, and net book value were as follows. The $4 million increase to core deposit intangibles during the first nine months of 2007 was attributable to the June 2007 acquisition of First National Bank, while the $1 million increase to other intangibles was attributable to the value of check processing contracts purchased in June 2007.

The Corporation sells residential mortgage loans in the secondary market and typically retains the right to service the loans sold. Upon sale, a mortgage servicing rights asset is capitalized, which represents the then current fair value of future net cash flows expected to be realized for performing servicing activities. Mortgage servicing rights, when purchased, are initially recorded at fair value (i.e. the purchase price paid). As the Corporation has not elected to subsequently measure any class of servicing assets under the fair value measurement method, the Corporation follows the amortization method. Mortgage servicing rights are amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing income, and assessed for impairment at each reporting date. Mortgage servicing rights are carried at the lower of the initial capitalized amount, net of accumulated amortization, or estimated fair value, and are included in other intangible assets, net in the consolidated balance sheets. At September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the fair value of the mortgage servicing rights was $64.4 million and $76.7 million, respectively.

The Corporation periodically evaluates its mortgage servicing rights asset for impairment. Impairment is assessed based on fair value at each reporting date using estimated prepayment speeds of the underlying mortgage loans serviced and stratifications based on the risk characteristics of the underlying loans (predominantly loan type and note interest rate). As mortgage interest rates rise, prepayment speeds are usually slower and the value of the mortgage servicing rights asset generally increases, requiring less valuation reserve. A valuation allowance is established, through a charge to earnings, to the extent the amortized cost of the mortgage servicing rights exceeds the estimated fair value by stratification. If it is later determined that all or a portion of the temporary impairment no longer exists for a stratification, the valuation is reduced through a recovery to earnings. An other-than-temporary impairment (i.e., recoverability is considered remote when considering interest rates and loan pay off activity) is recognized as a write-down of the mortgage servicing rights asset and the related valuation allowance (to the extent a valuation allowance is available) and then against earnings. A direct write-down permanently reduces the carrying value of the mortgage servicing rights asset and valuation allowance, precluding subsequent recoveries.

Mortgage servicing rights expense is a component of mortgage banking, net, in the consolidated statements of income. The $10.3 million mortgage servicing rights expense for the first nine months of 2007 was comprised of $13.1 million of base amortization and a $2.7 million recovery to the valuation allowance, while the $12.4 million

mortgage servicing rights expense for the first nine months of 2006 was comprised of base amortization of $15.2 million and a $2.8 million recovery to the valuation allowance. For the full year 2006, the $18.1 million mortgage servicing rights expense included $20.4 million base amortization, net of a $2.3 million recovery to the valuation allowance.

A summary of changes in the balance of the mortgage servicing rights asset and the mortgage servicing rights valuation allowance was as follows.

The following table shows the estimated future amortization expense for amortizing intangible assets. The projections of amortization expense for the next five years are based on existing asset balances, the current interest rate environment, and prepayment speeds as of September 30, 2007. The actual amortization expense the Corporation recognizes in any given period may be significantly different depending upon acquisition or sale activities, changes in interest rates, market conditions, regulatory requirements, and events or circumstances that indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

Long-term funding (funding with original contractual maturities greater than one year) was as follows.

Federal Home Loan Bank advances: Long-term advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) had maturities through 2020 and had weighted-average interest rates of 4.67% at September 30, 2007, compared to 4.04% at December 31, 2006. These advances had a combination of fixed and variable contractual rates, of which, 40% were variable at September 30, 2007, while 22% were variable at December 31, 2006. In late September 2007 the Corporation entered into an interest rate swap to hedge the interest rate risk in the cash flows of a $200 million variable rate, long-term FHLB advance. The fair value of the derivative was a $0.2 million gain at September 30, 2007.

Bank notes: The long-term bank notes had maturities through 2008 and had weighted-average interest rates of 5.09% at September 30, 2007, and 5.18% at December 31, 2006. These notes had a combination of fixed and variable rates, of which 75% were variable rate at September 30, 2007, compared to 84% variable rate at December 31, 2006.

Repurchase agreements: The long-term repurchase agreements had maturities through 2010 and had weighted-average interest rates of 4.66% at September 30, 2007, and 4.81% at December 31, 2006. These repurchase agreements were 100% variable rate for all periods presented.

Subordinated debt: In August 2001, the Corporation issued $200 million of 10-year subordinated debt. This debt was issued at a discount and has a fixed coupon interest rate of 6.75%. The subordinated debt qualifies under the risk-based capital guidelines as Tier 2 supplementary capital for regulatory purposes.

Junior subordinated debentures: The Corporation has $180.4 million of junior subordinated debentures (“ASBC Debentures”), which carry a fixed rate of 7.625% and mature on June 15, 2032. The Corporation has the right to redeem the ASBC Debentures, at par, on or after May 30, 2007. During 2002, the Corporation entered into interest rate swaps to hedge the interest rate risk on the ASBC Debentures. The fair value of the derivative was a $1.7 million loss at September 30, 2007, compared to a $1.0 million loss at December 31, 2006. The carrying value of the ASBC Debentures was $178.7 million and $179.3 million at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. With its October 2005 acquisition, the Corporation acquired $30.9 million of variable rate junior subordinated debentures (the “SFSC Debentures”), from two equal issuances, of which one pays a variable rate adjusted quarterly based on the 90-day LIBOR plus 2.80% (or 8.16% at September 30, 2007) and matures April 23, 2034, and the other which pays a variable rate adjusted quarterly based on the 90-day LIBOR plus 3.45% (or 9.01% at September 30, 2007) and matures November 7, 2032. The Corporation has the right to redeem the SFSC Debentures, at par, on April 23, 2009, and November 7, 2007, respectively, and quarterly thereafter. The carrying value of the SFSC Debentures was $36.9 million and $37.1 million at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.

A summary of activity in comprehensive income follows.

The Corporation and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various states jurisdictions. Generally, the Corporation is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 1999.

The Corporation adopted the provisions of FIN 48 effective January 1, 2007, resulting in no cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the date of adoption. As of January 1, 2007, the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $29 million. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate is $21 million.

The Corporation recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in the income tax expense line of the consolidated statements of income. As of January 1, 2007, the Corporation had expensed $4 million of interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits. Management does not anticipate significant adjustments to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months.

The table below identifies the Corporation’s derivative instruments, excluding mortgage derivatives, at September 30, 2007, and December 31, 2006, as well as which instruments receive hedge accounting treatment. Included in the table below for both September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, were customer interest rate swaps and interest rate caps for which the Corporation has mirror swaps and caps. Also included in the table below at September 30, 2007, were customer interest rate collars for which the Corporation has mirror collars. The fair value of these customer swaps, caps, and collars and of the mirror swaps, caps, and collars is recorded in earnings and the net impact for the first nine months of 2007 and 2006, and full year 2006 was immaterial.

For the first nine months of 2007, the Corporation recognized combined ineffectiveness of $0.1 million (which decreased net interest income), relating to the Corporation’s fair value hedge of a long-term, fixed rate subordinated debenture. The Corporation recognized combined ineffectiveness of $0.1 million (which increased net interest income) for the first nine months of 2006 and $1.1 million (which increased net interest income) for full year 2006 relating to the Corporation’s fair value hedges of long-term, fixed-rate commercial loans and a long-term, fixed-rate subordinated debenture. No components of the derivatives change in fair value were excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. Prior to March 31, 2006, the Corporation had been using the short cut method of assessing hedge effectiveness for a fair value hedge with $175 million notional balance hedging a long-term, fixed-rate subordinated debenture. Effective March 31, 2006, the Corporation de-designated the hedging relationship under the short cut method and re-designated the hedging relationship under a long-haul method utilizing the same instruments. In December 2006, the Corporation terminated all swaps hedging long-term, fixed-rate commercial loans for a net gain of approximately $0.8 million, recorded in other noninterest income.

In addition to the fair value hedges noted above, in late September 2007 the Corporation entered into an interest rate swap accounted for as a cash flow hedge which hedges the interest rate risk in the cash flows of a long-term, variable-rate FHLB advance. Hedge effectiveness is determined using regression analysis. At September 30, 2007, there was no ineffectiveness recorded related to the cash flow hedge. No components of the derivatives change in fair value were excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. Derivative gains and losses reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to current period earnings are included in interest expense on long-term funding, i.e. the line item in which the hedged cash flows are recorded. At September 30, 2007, accumulated other comprehensive income included a deferred after-tax net gain of $0.1 million related to this derivative. The net after-tax derivative gain included in accumulated other comprehensive income at September 30, 2007, is projected to be reclassified into net interest income in conjunction with the recognition of interest payments on the long-term, variable-rate FHLB advance through June 2009.

For the mortgage derivatives, which are not included in the table above and are not accounted for as hedges, changes in the fair value are recorded to mortgage banking, net. The fair value of the mortgage derivatives at September 30, 2007, was a net loss of $0.9 million, comprised of the net loss on commitments to fund approximately $98 million of loans to individual borrowers and the net loss on commitments to sell approximately $143 million of loans to various investors. The fair value of the mortgage derivatives at September 30, 2006, was a net loss of $1.1 million, comprised of the net loss on commitments to fund approximately $125 million of loans to individual borrowers and the net loss on commitments to sell approximately $176 million of

loans to various investors. The fair value of the mortgage derivatives at December 31, 2006, was a net loss of $0.7 million, comprised of the net loss on commitments to fund approximately $91 million of loans to individual borrowers and the net gain on commitments to sell approximately $138 million of loans to various investors.

The Corporation utilizes a variety of financial instruments in the normal course of business to meet the financial needs of its customers and to manage its own exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. These financial instruments include lending-related and other commitments (see below) and derivative instruments (see Note 12).

As a financial services provider, the Corporation routinely enters into commitments to extend credit. Such commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval process accorded to loans made by the Corporation, with each customer’s creditworthiness evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require the payment of a fee. The Corporation’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to these financial instruments is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Corporation upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer. Since a significant portion of commitments to extend credit expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash flow requirements.

Lending-related commitments include commitments to extend credit, commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale, commercial letters of credit, and standby letters of credit. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to customers at predetermined interest rates as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contracts. Commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale and forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans are considered derivative instruments, and the fair value of these commitments is recorded on the consolidated balance sheets. The Corporation’s derivative and hedging activity is further described in Note 12. Commercial and standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Commercial letters of credit are issued specifically to facilitate commerce and typically result in the commitment being drawn on when the underlying transaction is consummated between the customer and the third party, while standby letters of credit generally are contingent upon the failure of the customer to perform according to the terms of the underlying contract with the third party.

The Corporation has principal investment commitments to provide capital-based financing to private and public companies through either direct investments in specific companies or through investment funds and partnerships. The timing of future cash requirements to fund such commitments is generally dependent on the investment cycle, whereby privately held companies are funded by private equity investors and ultimately sold, merged, or taken public through an initial offering, which can vary based on overall market conditions, as well as the nature and type of industry in which the companies operate. The Corporation also invests in low-income housing, small-business commercial real estate, and historic tax credit projects to promote the revitalization of low-to-moderate-income neighborhoods throughout the local communities of its bank subsidiary. As a limited partner in these unconsolidated projects, the Corporation is allocated tax credits and deductions associated with the underlying

projects. As of September 30, 2007, the Corporation’s commitment for all these investments was $54 million (of which, $27 million was funded), while at December 31, 2006, the Corporation’s commitment for all these investments was $40 million (of which, $18 million was funded). The aggregate carrying value of these investments at September 30, 2007, was $24 million, included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets, compared to $15 million at December 31, 2006.

In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation may be named as defendant in or be a party to various pending and threatened legal proceedings. Since it is not possible to formulate a meaningful opinion as to the range of possible outcomes and plaintiffs’ ultimate damage claims, management cannot estimate the specific possible loss or range of loss that may result from these proceedings. Management believes, based upon current knowledge, that liabilities arising out of any such current proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity of the Corporation.

Residential mortgage loans sold to others are predominantly conventional residential first lien mortgages originated under our usual underwriting procedures, and are most often sold on a nonrecourse basis. The Corporation’s agreements to sell residential mortgage loans in the normal course of business usually require certain representations and warranties on the underlying loans sold, related to credit information, loan documentation, collateral, and insurability, which if subsequently are untrue or breached, could require the Corporation to repurchase certain loans affected. There have been insignificant instances of repurchase under representations and warranties. To a much lesser degree, the Corporation may sell residential mortgage loans with limited recourse (limited in that the recourse period ends prior to the loan’s maturity, usually after certain time and/or loan paydown criteria have been met), whereby repurchase could be required if the loan had defined delinquency issues during the limited recourse periods. At September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, there were approximately $83 million and $62 million, respectively, of residential mortgage loans sold with such recourse risk, upon which there have been insignificant instances of repurchase. Given that the underlying loans delivered to buyers are predominantly conventional residential first lien mortgages originated or purchased under our usual underwriting procedures, and that historical experience shows negligible losses and insignificant repurchase activity, management believes that losses and repurchases under the limited recourse provisions will continue to be insignificant.

In October 2004 the Corporation acquired a thrift. Prior to the acquisition, this thrift retained a subordinate position to the FHLB in the credit risk on the underlying residential mortgage loans it sold to the FHLB in exchange for a monthly credit enhancement fee. The Corporation has not sold loans to the FHLB with such credit risk retention since February 2005. At September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, there were $1.6 billion and $1.8 billion, respectively, of such residential mortgage loans with credit risk recourse, upon which there have been negligible historical losses to the Corporation.

The Corporation has a noncontributory defined benefit retirement plan (the Retirement Account Plan (“RAP”)) covering substantially all full-time employees. The benefits are based primarily on years of service and the employee’s compensation paid. Employees of acquired entities generally participate in the RAP after consummation of the business combinations. The plans of acquired entities are typically merged into the RAP after completion of the mergers, and credit is usually given to employees for years of service at the acquired institution for vesting and eligibility purposes. In connection with an acquisition in October 2004, the Corporation assumed the First Federal pension plan (the “First Federal Plan”). The First Federal Plan was frozen on December 31, 2004, and qualified participants in the First Federal Plan became eligible to participate in the RAP as of January 1, 2005. Additional discussion and information on the RAP and the First Federal Plan are collectively referred to below as the “Pension Plan.”

Associated also provides healthcare benefits for eligible retired employees in its Postretirement Plan (the “Postretirement Plan”). Retirees who are at least 55 years of age with 10 years of service are eligible to participate in the plan. Additionally, with the rise in healthcare costs for retirees under the age of 65, the

Corporation changed its postretirement benefits to include a subsidy for those employees who are at least age 55 but less than age 65 with at least 15 years of service as of January 1, 2007. This subsidy has been accounted for as a plan amendment and increased the projected benefit obligation by $2.7 million in 2006. The Corporation has no plan assets attributable to the plan, and funds the benefits as claims arise. The Corporation reserves the right to terminate or make changes to the plan at any time.

The components of net periodic benefit cost for the Pension and Postretirement Plans for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, and for the full year 2006 were as follows.

The Corporation’s funding policy is to pay at least the minimum amount required by the funding requirements of federal law and regulations, with consideration given to the maximum funding amounts allowed. The Corporation contributed $10 million to its Pension Plan during the first quarter of 2007, and as of September 30, 2007, does not expect to make additional contributions for the remainder of 2007. The Corporation regularly reviews the funding of its Pension Plan.

Selected financial and descriptive information is required to be provided about reportable operating segments, considering a “management approach” concept as the basis for identifying reportable segments. The management approach is to be based on the way that management organizes the segments within the enterprise for making operating decisions, allocating resources, and assessing performance. Consequently, the segments are evident from the structure of the enterprise’s internal organization, focusing on financial information that an enterprise’s chief operating decision-makers use to make decisions about the enterprise’s operating matters.

The Corporation’s primary segment is banking, conducted through its bank and lending subsidiaries. For purposes of segment disclosure, as allowed by the governing accounting statement, these entities have been combined as one segment that have similar economic characteristics and the nature of their products, services, processes, customers, delivery channels, and regulatory environment are similar. Banking consists of lending and deposit gathering (as well as other banking-related products and services) to businesses, governmental units, and consumers (including mortgages, home equity lending, and card products) and the support to deliver, fund, and manage such banking services.

The wealth management segment provides products and a variety of fiduciary, investment management, advisory, and Corporate agency services to assist customers in building, investing, or protecting their wealth, including insurance, brokerage, and trust/asset management. The other segment includes intersegment eliminations and residual revenues and expenses, representing the difference between actual amounts incurred and the amounts allocated to operating segments.

Selected segment information is presented below.