Atmos Energy
ATO
#897
Rank
โ‚ฌ22.69 B
Marketcap
140,32ย โ‚ฌ
Share price
0.20%
Change (1 day)
3.94%
Change (1 year)
Atmos Energy Corporation, headquartered in Dallas, Texas, is an American natural-gas distributor.

Atmos Energy - 10-Q quarterly report FY2011 Q3


Text size:
Table of Contents

 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
Form 10-Q
 
   
(Mark One)  
þ
 QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
or
o
 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  For the transition period from to
 
 
Commission File Number 1-10042
 
Atmos Energy Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
   
Texas and Virginia
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 75-1743247
(IRS employer
identification no.)
Three Lincoln Centre, Suite 1800
5430 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
 75240
(Zip code)
 
(972) 934-9227
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 ofRegulation S-T(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes þ     No o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” inRule 12b-2of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-acceleratedfiler o Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2of the Exchange Act) Yeso      No þ
 
Number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of July 29, 2011.
 
   
Class
 
Shares Outstanding
 
No Par Value
 90,285,306
 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

GLOSSARY OF KEY TERMS
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Item 6. Exhibits
SIGNATURE
EXHIBITS INDEX
EX-12
EX-15
EX-31
EX-32
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT


Table of Contents

 
GLOSSARY OF KEY TERMS
 
   
AEC
 Atmos Energy Corporation
AEH
 Atmos Energy Holdings, Inc.
AEM
 Atmos Energy Marketing, LLC
AOCI
 Accumulated other comprehensive income
APS
 Atmos Pipeline and Storage, LLC
Bcf
 Billion cubic feet
FASB
 Financial Accounting Standards Board
Fitch
 Fitch Ratings, Ltd.
GRIP
 Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program
GSRS
 Gas System Reliability Surcharge
ISRS
 Infrastructure System Replacement Surcharge
Mcf
 Thousand cubic feet
MMcf
 Million cubic feet
Moody’s
 Moody’s Investors Services, Inc.
NYMEX
 New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc.
PPA
 Pension Protection Act of 2006
PRP
 Pipeline Replacement Program
RRC
 Railroad Commission of Texas
RRM
 Rate Review Mechanism
S&P
 Standard & Poor’s Corporation
SEC
 United States Securities and Exchange Commission
WNA
 Weather Normalization Adjustment


1


Table of Contents

 
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1.  Financial Statements
 
ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 
         
  June 30,
  September 30,
 
  2011  2010 
  (Unaudited)    
  (In thousands, except
 
  share data) 
 
ASSETS
Property, plant and equipment
 $6,599,950  $6,542,318 
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
  1,683,899   1,749,243 
         
Net property, plant and equipment
  4,916,051   4,793,075 
Current assets
        
Cash and cash equivalents
  117,429   131,952 
Accounts receivable, net
  342,092   273,207 
Gas stored underground
  256,768   319,038 
Other current assets
  273,459   150,995 
         
Total current assets
  989,748   875,192 
Goodwill and intangible assets
  739,677   740,148 
Deferred charges and other assets
  347,994   355,376 
         
  $6,993,470  $6,763,791 
         
 
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES
Shareholders’ equity
        
Common stock, no par value (stated at $.005 per share);
        
200,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding:
        
June 30, 2011 — 90,284,722 shares;
        
September 30, 2010 — 90,164,103 shares
 $451  $451 
Additional paid-in capital
  1,730,121   1,714,364 
Retained earnings
  599,506   486,905 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
  5,746   (23,372)
         
Shareholders’ equity
  2,335,824   2,178,348 
Long-term debt
  2,206,106   1,809,551 
         
Total capitalization
  4,541,930   3,987,899 
Current liabilities
        
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
  312,205   266,208 
Other current liabilities
  333,643   413,640 
Short-term debt
     126,100 
Current maturities of long-term debt
  2,434   360,131 
         
Total current liabilities
  648,282   1,166,079 
Deferred income taxes
  967,607   829,128 
Regulatory cost of removal obligation
  396,201   350,521 
Deferred credits and other liabilities
  439,450   430,164 
         
  $6,993,470  $6,763,791 
         
 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements


2


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
 
         
  Three Months Ended
 
  June 30 
  2011  2010 
  (Unaudited)
 
  (In thousands, except
 
  per share data) 
 
Operating revenues
        
Natural gas distribution segment
 $407,031  $396,319 
Regulated transmission and storage segment
  53,570   44,957 
Nonregulated segment
  491,285   427,405 
Intersegment eliminations
  (108,271)  (107,376)
         
   843,615   761,305 
Purchased gas cost
        
Natural gas distribution segment
  206,839   204,988 
Regulated transmission and storage segment
      
Nonregulated segment
  477,880   415,634 
Intersegment eliminations
  (107,909)  (106,983)
         
   576,810   513,639 
         
Gross profit
  266,805   247,666 
Operating expenses
        
Operation and maintenance
  112,665   111,559 
Depreciation and amortization
  56,932   51,940 
Taxes, other than income
  52,142   51,908 
Asset impairments
  10,988    
         
Total operating expenses
  232,727   215,407 
         
Operating income
  34,078   32,259 
Miscellaneous expense
  (1,430)  (798)
Interest charges
  35,845   37,267 
         
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
  (3,197)  (5,806)
Income tax benefit
  (1,723)  (1,577)
         
Loss from continuing operations
  (1,474)  (4,229)
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax ($590 and $700)
  908   1,075 
         
Net loss
 $(566) $(3,154)
         
Basic earning per share
        
Loss per share from continuing operations
 $(0.02) $(0.04)
Income per share from discontinued operations
  0.01   0.01 
         
Net loss per share — basic
 $(0.01) $(0.03)
         
Diluted earnings per share
        
Loss per share from continuing operations
 $(0.02) $(0.04)
Income per share from discontinued operations
  0.01   0.01 
         
Net loss per share — diluted
 $(0.01) $(0.03)
         
Cash dividends per share
 $0.34  $0.335 
         
Weighted average shares outstanding:
        
Basic
  90,127   92,648 
         
Diluted
  90,127   92,648 
         
 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements


3


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
 
         
  Nine Months Ended
 
  June 30 
  2011  2010 
  (Unaudited)
 
  (In thousands, except
 
  per share data) 
 
Operating revenues
        
Natural gas distribution segment
 $2,187,907  $2,512,032 
Regulated transmission and storage segment
  157,553   146,998 
Nonregulated segment
  1,550,456   1,652,453 
Intersegment eliminations
  (337,542)  (370,229)
         
   3,558,374   3,941,254 
Purchased gas cost
        
Natural gas distribution segment
  1,317,775   1,657,412 
Regulated transmission and storage segment
      
Nonregulated segment
  1,491,815   1,556,746 
Intersegment eliminations
  (336,413)  (369,017)
         
   2,473,177   2,845,141 
         
Gross profit
  1,085,197   1,096,113 
Operating expenses
        
Operation and maintenance
  341,317   348,458 
Depreciation and amortization
  167,176   156,201 
Taxes, other than income
  145,868   152,840 
Asset impairments
  30,270    
         
Total operating expenses
  684,631   657,499 
         
Operating income
  400,566   438,614 
Miscellaneous income (expense)
  24,046   (905)
Interest charges
  112,615   115,481 
         
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
  311,997   322,228 
Income tax expense
  114,211   124,199 
         
Income from continuing operations
  197,786   198,029 
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax ($5,122 and $4,094)
  7,854   6,273 
         
Net income
 $205,640  $204,302 
         
Basic earning per share
        
Income per share from continuing operations
 $2.17  $2.12 
Income per share from discontinued operations
  0.09   0.07 
         
Net income per share — basic
 $2.26  $2.19 
         
Diluted earnings per share
        
Income per share from continuing operations
 $2.16  $2.11 
Income per share from discontinued operations
  0.09   0.07 
         
Net income per share — diluted
 $2.25  $2.18 
         
Cash dividends per share
 $1.02  $1.005 
         
Weighted average shares outstanding:
        
Basic
  90,233   92,513 
         
Diluted
  90,530   92,856 
         
 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements


4


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 
         
  Nine Months Ended
 
  June 30 
  2011  2010 
  (Unaudited)
 
  (In thousands) 
 
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
        
Net income
 $205,640  $204,302 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
        
Asset impairments
  30,270    
Depreciation and amortization:
        
Charged to depreciation and amortization
  171,726   160,207 
Charged to other accounts
  149   116 
Deferred income taxes
  115,488   186,325 
Other
  15,927   18,425 
Net assets/liabilities from risk management activities
  (15,869)  3,429 
Net change in operating assets and liabilities
  (3,769)  21,760 
         
Net cash provided by operating activities
  519,562   594,564 
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
        
Capital expenditures
  (390,283)  (362,349)
Other, net
  (3,373)  (438)
         
Net cash used in investing activities
  (393,656)  (362,787)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
        
Net decrease in short-term debt
  (132,072)  (76,019)
Net proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
  394,618    
Settlement of Treasury lock agreements
  20,079    
Unwinding of Treasury lock agreements
  27,803    
Repayment of long-term debt
  (360,066)  (66)
Cash dividends paid
  (93,039)  (93,913)
Repurchase of equity awards
  (5,300)  (1,173)
Issuance of common stock
  7,548   8,574 
         
Net cash used in financing activities
  (140,429)  (162,597)
         
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
  (14,523)  69,180 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
  131,952   111,203 
         
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
 $117,429  $180,383 
         
 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements


5


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
 
1.  Nature of Business
 
Atmos Energy Corporation (“Atmos Energy” or the “Company”) and our subsidiaries are engaged primarily in the regulated natural gas distribution and transmission and storage businesses as well as certain other nonregulated businesses. Our corporate headquarters and shared-services function are located in Dallas, Texas and our customer support centers are located in Amarillo and Waco, Texas.
 
Through our natural gas distribution business, we deliver natural gas through sales and transportation arrangements to over three million residential, commercial, public authority and industrial customers through our six regulated natural gas distribution divisions which currently cover service areas located in 12 states. In addition, we transport natural gas for others through our distribution system. In May 2011, we announced that we had entered into a definitive agreement to sell our natural gas distribution operations in Missouri, Illinois and Iowa, representing approximately 84,000 customers. After the closing of this transaction, we will operate in nine states. Our regulated activities also include our regulated pipeline and storage operations, which include the transportation of natural gas to our distribution system and the management of our underground storage facilities. Our regulated businesses are subject to federal and state regulationand/orregulation by local authorities in each of the states in which our natural gas distribution divisions operate.
 
Our nonregulated businesses operate primarily in the Midwest and Southeast through various wholly-owned subsidiaries of Atmos Energy Holdings, Inc, (AEH). AEH is wholly owned by the Company and based in Houston, Texas. Through AEH, we provide natural gas management and transportation services to municipalities, natural gas distribution companies, including certain divisions of Atmos Energy and third parties. AEH also seeks to maximize, through asset optimization activities, the economic value associated with storage and transportation capacity it owns or controls. Certain of these arrangements are with regulated affiliates of the Company, which have been approved by applicable state regulatory commissions.
 
As discussed in Note 11, we operate the Company through the following three segments:
 
  • the natural gas distribution segment, which includes our regulated natural gas distribution and related sales operations,
 
  • the regulated transmission and storage segment, which includes the regulated pipeline and storage operations of our Atmos Pipeline — Texas Division and
 
  • the nonregulated segment, which includes our nonregulated natural gas management, nonregulated natural gas transmission, storage and other services.
 
2.  Unaudited Financial Information
 
These consolidated interim-period financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States on the same basis as those used for the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. In the opinion of management, all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation have been made to the unaudited consolidated interim-period financial statements. These consolidated interim-period financial statements are condensed as permitted by the instructions toForm 10-Qand should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of Atmos Energy Corporation included in our Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. Because of seasonal and other factors, the results of operations for the nine-month period ended June 30, 2011 are not indicative of our results of operations for the full 2011 fiscal year, which ends September 30, 2011.


6


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Our earnings have been impacted by several one-time items in the current year, including the following pre-tax amounts:
 
  • $27.8 million gain recorded in association with the unwinding of two Treasury locks in conjunction with the cancellation of a planned debt offering in November 2011.
 
  • $19.3 million non-cash impairment of assets in the Ft. Necessity storage project.
 
  • $11.0 million non-cash impairment of certain natural gas gathering assets.
 
  • $5.0 million one-time tax benefit related to the administrative settlement of various income tax positions.
 
We have evaluated subsequent events from the June 30, 2011 balance sheet date through the date these financial statements were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). No events have occurred subsequent to the balance sheet date that would require recognition or disclosure in the condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
Significant accounting policies
 
Our accounting policies are described in Note 2 to the financial statements in our Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010.
 
As a result of discontinued operations, certain prior-year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.
 
During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we completed our annual goodwill impairment assessment. Based on the assessment performed, we determined that our goodwill was not impaired.
 
During the nine months ended June 30, 2011, two new accounting standards became applicable to the Company pertaining to goodwill impairment testing for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts and disclosure of supplementary pro forma information for business combinations. The adoption of these standards had no impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. There were no other significant changes to our accounting policies during the nine months ended June 30, 2011.
 
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance that will provide a consistent definition of fair value and ensure that fair value measurements and disclosure requirements are similar between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. This guidance will change certain fair value measurement principles and enhances the disclosure requirements particularly for Level 3 fair value measurements and is effective prospectively for the Company for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We currently do not have any recurring Level 3 fair value measurements; accordingly, the adoption of this guidance will not impact our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
 
In June 2011, the FASB issued guidance related to the presentation of other comprehensive income which will require that all nonowner changes in shareholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In the two-statement approach, the first statement should present total net income and its components followed by a second statement that should present total other comprehensive income, the components of other comprehensive income, and the total of comprehensive income. This guidance is effective retrospectively for the Company for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this guidance will not impact our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.


7


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Regulatory assets and liabilities
 
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States require cost-based, rate-regulated entities that meet certain criteria to reflect the authorized recovery of costs due to regulatory decisions in their financial statements. As a result, certain costs are permitted to be capitalized rather than expensed because they can be recovered through rates. We record certain costs as regulatory assets when future recovery through customer rates is considered probable. Regulatory liabilities are recorded when it is probable that revenues will be reduced for amounts that will be credited to customers through the ratemaking process. Substantially all of our regulatory assets are recorded as a component of deferred charges and other assets and substantially all of our regulatory liabilities are recorded as a component of deferred credits and other liabilities. Deferred gas costs are recorded either in other current assets or liabilities and the regulatory cost of removal obligation is reported separately.
 
Significant regulatory assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 included the following:
 
         
  June 30,
  September 30,
 
  2011  2010 
  (In thousands) 
 
Regulatory assets:
        
Pension and postretirement benefit costs
 $200,393  $209,564 
Merger and integration costs, net
  6,360   6,714 
Deferred gas costs
  22,083   22,701 
Regulatory cost of removal asset
  32,691   31,014 
Environmental costs
  434   805 
Rate case costs
  5,321   4,505 
Deferred franchise fees
  393   1,161 
Other
  3,940   1,046 
         
  $271,615  $277,510 
         
Regulatory liabilities:
        
Deferred gas costs
 $18,739  $43,333 
Deferred franchise fees
  629    
Regulatory cost of removal obligation
  429,354   381,474 
Other
  9,166   6,112 
         
  $457,888  $430,919 
         
 
The June 30, 2011 amounts above do not include regulatory assets and liabilities related to our Missouri, Illinois and Iowa service areas, which are classified as assets held for sale as discussed in Note 5.
 
Currently, our authorized rates do not include a return on certain of our merger and integration costs; however, we recover the amortization of these costs. Merger and integration costs, net, are generally amortized on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives ranging up to 20 years. Environmental costs have been deferred to be included in future rate filings in accordance with rulings received from various state regulatory commissions.


8


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Comprehensive income
 
The following table presents the components of comprehensive income (loss), net of related tax, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
 
                 
  Three Months Ended
  Nine Months Ended
 
  June 30  June 30 
  2011  2010  2011  2010 
  (In thousands) 
 
Net income (loss)
 $(566) $(3,154) $205,640  $204,302 
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on investments, net of tax expense (benefit) of $(56) and $(996) for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and of $876 and $(198) for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
  (94)  (1,696)  1,492   (337)
Amortization, unrealized gain and unwinding of interest rate hedging transactions, net of tax expense (benefit) of $(4,629) and $247 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and $7,950 and $743 for the nine month ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
  (7,884)  422   13,536   1,265 
Net unrealized gains (losses) on commodity hedging transactions, net of tax expense (benefit) of $(182) and $5,066 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and $9,008 and $2,999 for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
  (285)  7,921   14,090   4,690 
                 
Comprehensive income (loss)
 $(8,829) $3,493  $234,758  $209,920 
                 
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, as of June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 consisted of the following unrealized gains (losses):
 
         
  June 30,
  September 30,
 
  2011  2010 
  (In thousands) 
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
        
Unrealized holding gains on investments
 $5,697  $4,205 
Treasury lock agreements
  8,068   (5,468)
Cash flow hedges
  (8,019)  (22,109)
         
  $5,746  $(23,372)
         
 
3.  Financial Instruments
 
We currently use financial instruments to mitigate commodity price risk. Additionally, we periodically utilize financial instruments to manage interest rate risk. The objectives and strategies for using financial instruments have been tailored to our regulated and nonregulated businesses. The accounting for these financial instruments is fully described in Note 2 to the financial statements in our Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. During the third quarter there were no changes in our objectives, strategies and accounting for these financial instruments. Currently, we utilize financial instruments in our natural gas distribution and nonregulated segments. We currently do not manage commodity price risk with financial instruments in our regulated transmission and storage segment.


9


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Our financial instruments do not contain any credit-risk-related or other contingent features that could cause accelerated payments when our financial instruments are in net liability positions.
 
Regulated Commodity Risk Management Activities
 
Although our purchased gas cost adjustment mechanisms essentially insulate our natural gas distribution segment from commodity price risk, our customers are exposed to the effects of volatile natural gas prices. We manage this exposure through a combination of physical storage, fixed-price forward contracts and financial instruments, primarilyover-the-counterswap and option contracts, in an effort to minimize the impact of natural gas price volatility on our customers during the winter heating season.
 
Our natural gas distribution gas supply department is responsible for executing this segment’s commodity risk management activities in conformity with regulatory requirements. In jurisdictions where we are permitted to mitigate commodity price risk through financial instruments, the relevant regulatory authorities may establish the level of heating season gas purchases that can be hedged. Historically, if the regulatory authority does not establish this level, we seek to hedge between 25 and 50 percent of anticipated heating season gas purchases using financial instruments. For the2010-2011heating season (generally October through March), in the jurisdictions where we are permitted to utilize financial instruments, we hedged approximately 35 percent, or 31.7 Bcf of the planned winter flowing gas requirements. We have not designated these financial instruments as hedges.
 
The costs associated with and the gains and losses arising from the use of financial instruments to mitigate commodity price risk are included in our purchased gas cost adjustment mechanisms in accordance with regulatory requirements. Therefore, changes in the fair value of these financial instruments are initially recorded as a component of deferred gas costs and recognized in the consolidated statement of income as a component of purchased gas cost when the related costs are recovered through our rates and recognized in revenue in accordance with applicable authoritative accounting guidance. Accordingly, there is no earnings impact on our natural gas distribution segment as a result of the use of financial instruments.
 
Nonregulated Commodity Risk Management Activities
 
In our nonregulated operations, we aggregate and purchase gas supply, arrange transportationand/orstorage logistics and ultimately deliver gas to our customers at competitive prices. To facilitate this process, we utilize proprietary and customer-owned transportation and storage assets to provide the various services our customers’ request.
 
We also perform asset optimization activities in our nonregulated segment. Through asset optimization activities, we seek to enhance our gross profit by maximizing the economic value associated with the storage and transportation capacity we own or control. We attempt to meet this objective by engaging in natural gas storage transactions in which we seek to find and profit from pricing differences that occur over time. We purchase physical natural gas and then sell financial instruments at advantageous prices to lock in a gross profit margin. Through the use of transportation and storage services and financial instruments, we also seek to capture gross profit margin through the arbitrage of pricing differences that exist in various locations and by recognizing pricing differences that occur over time. Over time, gains and losses on the sale of storage gas inventory should be offset by gains and losses on the financial instruments, resulting in the realization of the economic gross profit margin we anticipated at the time we structured the original transaction.
 
As a result of these activities, our nonregulated segment is exposed to risks associated with changes in the market price of natural gas. We manage our exposure to such risks through a combination of physical storage and financial instruments, including futures,over-the-counterand exchange-traded options and swap contracts with counterparties. Futures contracts provide the right to buy or sell the commodity at a fixed price in the future. Option contracts provide the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell the commodity at a fixed


10


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
price. Swap contracts require receipt of payment for the commodity based on the difference between a fixed price and the market price on the settlement date.
 
We use financial instruments, designated as cash flow hedges of anticipated purchases and sales at index prices, to mitigate the commodity price risk in our nonregulated operations associated with deliveries under fixed-priced forward contracts to deliver gas to customers. These financial instruments have maturity dates ranging from one to 65 months. We use financial instruments, designated as fair value hedges, to hedge our natural gas inventory used in our asset optimization activities in our nonregulated segment.
 
Also, in our nonregulated operations, we use storage swaps and futures to capture additional storage arbitrage opportunities that arise subsequent to the execution of the original fair value hedge associated with our physical natural gas inventory, basis swaps to insulate and protect the economic value of our fixed price and storage books and variousover-the-counterand exchange-traded options. These financial instruments have not been designated as hedges.
 
Our nonregulated risk management activities are controlled through various risk management policies and procedures. Our Audit Committee has oversight responsibility for our nonregulated risk management limits and policies. A risk committee, comprised of corporate and business unit officers, is responsible for establishing and enforcing our nonregulated risk management policies and procedures.
 
Under our risk management policies, we seek to match our financial instrument positions to our physical storage positions as well as our expected current and future sales and purchase obligations in order to maintain no open positions at the end of each trading day. The determination of our net open position as of any day, however, requires us to make assumptions as to future circumstances, including the use of gas by our customers in relation to our anticipated storage and market positions. Because the price risk associated with any net open position at the end of each day may increase if the assumptions are not realized, we review these assumptions as part of our daily monitoring activities. Our operations can also be affected by intraday fluctuations of gas prices, since the price of natural gas purchased or sold for future delivery earlier in the day may not be hedged until later in the day. At times, limited net open positions related to our existing and anticipated commitments may occur. At the close of business on June 30, 2011, our nonregulated segment had net open positions (including existing storage and related financial contracts) of 0.1 Bcf.
 
Interest Rate Risk Management Activities
 
We periodically manage interest rate risk by entering into Treasury lock agreements to fix the Treasury yield component of the interest cost associated with anticipated financings.
 
In September 2010, we entered into three Treasury lock agreements to fix the Treasury yield component of the interest cost associated with $300 million of a total $400 million of senior notes that were issued in June 2011. This offering is discussed in Note 6. We designated these Treasury locks as cash flow hedges of an anticipated transaction. The Treasury locks were settled on June 7, 2011 with the receipt of $20.1 million from the counterparties due to an increase in the30-yearTreasury lock rates between inception of the Treasury locks and settlement. Because the Treasury locks were effective, the net $12.6 million unrealized gain was recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income and will be recognized as a component of interest expense over the30-year life of the senior notes.
 
Additionally, our original fiscal 2011 financing plans included the issuance of $250 million of30-yearunsecured notes in November 2011 to fund our capital expenditure program. In September 2010, we entered into two Treasury lock agreements to fix the Treasury yield component of the interest cost associated with the anticipated issuance of these senior notes, which were designated as cash flow hedges of an anticipated transaction. Due to stronger than anticipated cash flows primarily resulting from the extension of the Bush tax cuts that allow the continued use of bonus depreciation on qualifying expenditures through December 31, 2011, the need to issue $250 million of debt in November was eliminated and the related Treasury lock


11


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
agreements were unwound in March 2011. As a result of unwinding these Treasury locks, we recognized a pre-tax cash gain of $27.8 million during the second quarter.
 
In prior years, we entered into Treasury lock agreements to fix the Treasury yield component of the interest cost associated with anticipated financings. These Treasury locks, as well as the Treasury locks discussed above, were settled at various times at a cumulative net loss. These realized gains and losses were recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and are being recognized as a component of interest expense over the life of the associated notes from the date of settlement. The remaining amortization periods for the settled Treasury locks extend through fiscal 2041.
 
Quantitative Disclosures Related to Financial Instruments
 
The following tables present detailed information concerning the impact of financial instruments on our condensed consolidated balance sheet and income statements.
 
As of June 30, 2011, our financial instruments were comprised of both long and short commodity positions. A long position is a contract to purchase the commodity, while a short position is a contract to sell the commodity. As of June 30, 2011, we had net long/(short) commodity contracts outstanding in the following quantities:
 
               
    Natural
       
  Hedge
 Gas
       
Contract Type Designation Distribution  Nonregulated    
    Quantity (MMcf)    
 
Commodity contracts
 Fair Value     (20,915)    
  Cash Flow     28,317     
  Not designated  16,340   18,140     
               
     16,340   25,542     
               
 
Financial Instruments on the Balance Sheet
 
The following tables present the fair value and balance sheet classification of our financial instruments by operating segment as of June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010. As required by authoritative accounting literature, the fair value amounts below are presented on a gross basis and do not reflect the netting of asset and liability positions permitted under the terms of our master netting arrangements. Further, the amounts below do not include $15.4 million and $24.9 million of cash held on deposit in margin accounts as of June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 to collateralize certain financial instruments. Therefore, these gross balances are not indicative of either our actual credit exposure or net economic exposure. Additionally, the amounts below


12


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
will not be equal to the amounts presented on our condensed consolidated balance sheet, nor will they be equal to the fair value information presented for our financial instruments in Note 4.
 
               
    Natural
       
    Gas
       
  Balance Sheet Location Distribution  Nonregulated  Total 
    (In thousands) 
 
June 30, 2011
              
Designated As Hedges:
              
Asset Financial Instruments
              
Current commodity contracts
 Other current assets $  $11,529  $11,529 
Noncurrent commodity contracts
 Deferred charges and other assets     241   241 
Liability Financial Instruments
              
Current commodity contracts
 Other current liabilities     (15,930)  (15,930)
Noncurrent commodity contracts
 Deferred credits and other liabilities     (6,237)  (6,237)
               
Total
       (10,397)  (10,397)
Not Designated As Hedges:
              
Asset Financial Instruments
              
Current commodity contracts
 Other current assets  1,972   19,174   21,146 
Noncurrent commodity contracts
 Deferred charges and other assets  767   7,093   7,860 
Liability Financial Instruments
              
Current commodity contracts
 Other current liabilities  (5,207)  (20,109)  (25,316)
Noncurrent commodity contracts
 Deferred credits and other liabilities  (56)  (7,170)  (7,226)
               
Total
    (2,524)  (1,012)  (3,536)
               
Total Financial Instruments
   $(2,524) $(11,409) $(13,933)
               
 
               
    Natural
       
    Gas
       
  Balance Sheet Location Distribution  Nonregulated  Total 
    (In thousands) 
 
September 30, 2010
              
Designated As Hedges:
              
Asset Financial Instruments
              
Current commodity contracts
 Other current assets $  $40,030  $40,030 
Noncurrent commodity contracts
 Deferred charges and other assets     2,461   2,461 
Liability Financial Instruments
              
Current commodity contracts
 Other current liabilities     (56,575)  (56,575)
Noncurrent commodity contracts
 Deferred credits and other liabilities     (9,222)  (9,222)
               
Total
       (23,306)  (23,306)
               
Not Designated As Hedges:
              
Asset Financial Instruments
              
Current commodity contracts
 Other current assets  2,219   16,459   18,678 
Noncurrent commodity contracts
 Deferred charges and other assets  47   2,056   2,103 
               
Liability Financial Instruments
              
Current commodity contracts
 Other current liabilities  (48,942)  (7,178)  (56,120)
Noncurrent commodity contracts
 Deferred credits and other liabilities  (2,924)  (405)  (3,329)
               
Total
    (49,600)  10,932   (38,668)
               
Total Financial Instruments
   $(49,600) $(12,374) $(61,974)
               
 
Impact of Financial Instruments on the Income Statement
 
Hedge ineffectiveness for our nonregulated segment is recorded as a component of unrealized gross profit and primarily results from differences in the location and timing of the derivative instrument and the hedged item. Hedge ineffectiveness could materially affect our results of operations for the reported period. For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 we recognized a gain arising from fair value and cash flow hedge ineffectiveness of $5.8 million and $3.8 million. For the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 we


13


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
recognized a gain arising from fair value and cash flow hedge ineffectiveness of $23.3 million and $44.2 million. Additional information regarding ineffectiveness recognized in the income statement is included in the tables below.
 
Fair Value Hedges
 
The impact of our nonregulated commodity contracts designated as fair value hedges and the related hedged item on our condensed consolidated income statement for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 is presented below.
 
         
  Three Months Ended June 30 
  2011  2010 
  (In thousands) 
 
Commodity contracts
 $7,837  $(10,525)
Fair value adjustment for natural gas inventory designated as the hedged item
  (1,781)  14,678 
         
Total impact on revenue
 $6,056  $4,153 
         
The impact on revenue is comprised of the following:
        
Basis ineffectiveness
 $853  $(235)
Timing ineffectiveness
  5,203   4,388 
         
  $6,056  $4,153 
         
 
         
  Nine Months Ended June 30 
  2011  2010 
  (In thousands) 
 
Commodity contracts
 $4,834  $20,296 
Fair value adjustment for natural gas inventory designated as the hedged item
  19,430   26,195 
         
Total impact on revenue
 $24,264  $46,491 
         
The impact on revenue is comprised of the following:
        
Basis ineffectiveness
 $1,265  $(684)
Timing ineffectiveness
  22,999   47,175 
         
  $24,264  $46,491 
         
 
Basis ineffectiveness arises from natural gas market price differences between the locations of the hedged inventory and the delivery location specified in the hedge instruments. Timing ineffectiveness arises due to changes in the difference between the spot price and the futures price, as well as the difference between the timing of the settlement of the futures and the valuation of the underlying physical commodity. As the commodity contract nears the settlement date,spot-to-forwardprice differences should converge, which should reduce or eliminate the impact of this ineffectiveness on revenue.


14


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Cash Flow Hedges
 
The impact of cash flow hedges on our condensed consolidated income statements for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 is presented below. Note that this presentation does not reflect the financial impact arising from the hedged physical transaction. Therefore, this presentation is not indicative of the economic gross profit we realized when the underlying physical and financial transactions were settled.
 
                 
  Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 
  Natural
  Regulated
       
  Gas
  Transmission
       
  Distribution  and Storage  Nonregulated  Consolidated 
  (In thousands) 
 
Loss reclassified from AOCI into revenue for effective portion of commodity contracts
 $  $    —  $(3,907) $(3,907)
Loss arising from ineffective portion of commodity contracts
        (281)  (281)
                 
Total impact on revenue
        (4,188)  (4,188)
Loss on settled Treasury lock agreements reclassified from AOCI into interest expense
  (614)        (614)
                 
Total Impact from Cash Flow Hedges
 $(614) $  $(4,188) $(4,802)
                 
 
                 
  Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 
  Natural
  Regulated
       
  Gas
  Transmission
       
  Distribution  and Storage  Nonregulated  Consolidated 
  (In thousands) 
 
Loss reclassified from AOCI into revenue for effective portion of commodity contracts
 $  $    —  $(8,523) $(8,523)
Loss arising from ineffective portion of commodity contracts
        (350)  (350)
                 
Total impact on revenue
        (8,873)  (8,873)
Loss on settled Treasury lock agreements reclassified from AOCI into interest expense
  (669)        (669)
                 
Total Impact from Cash Flow Hedges
 $(669) $  $(8,873) $(9,542)
                 
 


15


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
                 
  Nine Months Ended June 30, 2011 
  Natural
  Regulated
       
  Gas
  Transmission
       
  Distribution  and Storage  Nonregulated  Consolidated 
  (In thousands) 
 
Loss reclassified from AOCI into revenue
                
for effective portion of commodity contracts
 $  $  $(25,488) $(25,488)
Loss arising from ineffective portion of commodity contracts
        (958)  (958)
                 
Total impact on revenue
        (26,446)  (26,446)
Loss on settled Treasury lock agreements reclassified from AOCI into interest expense
  (1,953)        (1,953)
Gain on unwinding of Treasury lock reclassified from AOCI into miscellaneous income
  21,803   6,000      27,803 
                 
Total Impact from Cash Flow Hedges
 $19,850  $6,000  $(26,446) $(596)
                 
 
                 
  Nine Months Ended June 30, 2010 
  Natural
  Regulated
       
  Gas
  Transmission
       
  Distribution  and Storage  Nonregulated  Consolidated 
  (In thousands) 
 
Loss reclassified from AOCI into revenue for effective portion of commodity contracts
 $  $    —  $(40,196) $(40,196)
Loss arising from ineffective portion of commodity contracts
        (2,307)  (2,307)
                 
Total impact on revenue
        (42,503)  (42,503)
Loss on settled Treasury lock agreements reclassified from AOCI into interest expense
  (2,008)        (2,008)
                 
Total Impact from Cash Flow Hedges
 $(2,008) $  $(42,503) $(44,511)
                 

16


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The following table summarizes the gains and losses arising from hedging transactions that were recognized as a component of other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes, for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. The amounts included in the table below exclude gains and losses arising from ineffectiveness because those amounts are immediately recognized in the income statement as incurred.
 
                 
  Three Months Ended
  Nine Months Ended
 
  June 30  June 30 
  2011  2010  2011  2010 
  (In thousands) 
 
Increase (decrease) in fair value:
                
Treasury lock agreements
 $(8,270) $  $29,822  $ 
Forward commodity contracts
  (2,668)  2,722   (1,457)  (19,829)
Recognition of (gains) losses in earnings due to settlements:
                
Treasury lock agreements
  386   422   (16,286)  1,265 
Forward commodity contracts
  2,383   5,199   15,547   24,519 
                 
Total other comprehensive income (loss) from hedging, net of tax(1)
 $(8,169) $8,343  $27,626  $5,955 
                 
 
 
(1)Utilizing an income tax rate ranging from 37 percent to 39 percent based on the effective rates in each taxing jurisdiction.
 
Deferred gains (losses) recorded in AOCI associated with our treasury lock agreements are recognized in earnings as they are amortized, while deferred losses associated with commodity contracts are recognized in earnings upon settlement. The following amounts, net of deferred taxes, represent the expected recognition in earnings of the deferred gains (losses) recorded in AOCI associated with our financial instruments, based upon the fair values of these financial instruments as of June 30, 2011.
 
             
  Treasury
       
  Lock
  Commodity
    
  Agreements  Contracts  Total 
  (In thousands) 
 
Next twelve months
 $(1,266) $(3,905) $(5,171)
Thereafter
  9,334   (4,114)  5,220 
             
Total(1)
 $8,068  $(8,019) $49 
             
 
 
(1)Utilizing an income tax rate ranging from 37 percent to 39 percent based on the effective rates in each taxing jurisdiction.
 
Financial Instruments Not Designated as Hedges
 
The impact of financial instruments that have not been designated as hedges on our condensed consolidated income statements for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was an increase (decrease) in revenue of $(4.3) million and $0.7 million. For the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 revenue increased $3.9 million and $13.0 million. Note that this presentation does not reflect the expected gains or losses arising from the underlying physical transactions associated with these financial instruments. Therefore, this presentation is not indicative of the economic gross profit we realized when the underlying physical and financial transactions were settled.


17


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
As discussed above, financial instruments used in our natural gas distribution segment are not designated as hedges. However, there is no earnings impact on our natural gas distribution segment as a result of the use of these financial instruments because the gains and losses arising from the use of these financial instruments are recognized in the consolidated statement of income as a component of purchased gas cost when the related costs are recovered through our rates and recognized in revenue. Accordingly, the impact of these financial instruments is excluded from this presentation.
 
4.  Fair Value Measurements
 
We report certain assets and liabilities at fair value, which is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). We record cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable at carrying value, which substantially approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these assets and liabilities. For other financial assets and liabilities, we primarily use quoted market prices and other observable market pricing information to minimize the use of unobservable pricing inputs in our measurements when determining fair value. The methods used to determine fair value for our assets and liabilities are fully described in Note 2 to the financial statements in our Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011, there were no changes in these methods.
 
Fair value measurements also apply to the valuation of our pension and postretirement plan assets. Current accounting guidance requires employers to annually disclose information about fair value measurements of the assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. The fair value of these assets is presented in Note 8 to the financial statements in our Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010.
 
Quantitative Disclosures
 
Financial Instruments
 
The classification of our fair value measurements requires judgment regarding the degree to which market data are observable or corroborated by observable market data. Authoritative accounting literature establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value based on observable and unobservable data. The hierarchy categorizes the inputs into three levels, with the highest priority given to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1), with the lowest priority given to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The following tables summarize, by level within the fair value hierarchy, our assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2011 and


18


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
September 30, 2010. Assets and liabilities are categorized in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
 
                     
  Quoted
  Significant
  Significant
       
  Prices in
  Other
  Other
       
  Active
  Observable
  Unobservable
  Netting and
    
  Markets
  Inputs
  Inputs
  Cash
  June 30,
 
  (Level 1)  (Level 2)(1)  (Level 3)  Collateral(2)  2011 
  (In thousands) 
 
Assets:
                    
Financial instruments
                    
Natural gas distribution segment
 $  $2,739  $     —  $  $2,739 
Nonregulated segment
  3,696   34,367      (25,006)  13,057 
                     
Total financial instruments
  3,696   37,106      (25,006)  15,796 
Hedged portion of gas stored underground
  86,544            86,544 
Available-for-salesecurities
  44,045            44,045 
                     
Total assets
 $134,285  $37,106  $  $(25,006) $146,385 
                     
Liabilities:
                    
Financial instruments
                    
Natural gas distribution segment
 $  $5,263  $  $  $5,263 
Nonregulated segment
  10,645   38,827      (40,388)  9,084 
                     
Total liabilities
 $10,645  $44,090  $  $(40,388) $14,347 
                     
 
                     
  Quoted
  Significant
  Significant
       
  Prices in
  Other
  Other
       
  Active
  Observable
  Unobservable
  Netting and
    
  Markets
  Inputs
  Inputs
  Cash
  September 30,
 
  (Level 1)  (Level 2)(1)  (Level 3)  Collateral(3)  2010 
  (In thousands)    
 
Assets:
                    
Financial instruments
                    
Natural gas distribution segment
 $  $2,266  $     —  $  $2,266 
Nonregulated segment
  18,544   42,462      (41,760)  19,246 
                     
Total financial instruments
  18,544   44,728      (41,760)  21,512 
Hedged portion of gas stored underground
  57,507            57,507 
Available-for-salesecurities
  41,466            41,466 
                     
Total assets
 $117,517  $44,728  $  $(41,760) $120,485 
                     
Liabilities:
                    
Financial instruments
                    
Natural gas distribution segment
 $  $51,866  $  $  $51,866 
Nonregulated segment
  41,430   31,950      (66,649)  6,731 
                     
Total liabilities
 $41,430  $83,816  $  $(66,649) $58,597 
                     
 
 
(1)Our Level 2 measurements primarily consist of non-exchange-traded financial instruments, such asover-the-counteroptions and swaps where market data for pricing is observable. The fair values for these assets and liabilities are determined using a market-based approach in which observable market prices are


19


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
adjusted for criteria specific to each instrument, such as the strike price, notional amount or basis differences.
 
(2)This column reflects adjustments to our gross financial instrument assets and liabilities to reflect netting permitted under our master netting agreements and the relevant authoritative accounting literature. In addition, as of June 30, 2011, we had $15.4 million of cash held in margin accounts to collateralize certain financial instruments. Of this amount, $4.4 million was used to offset current risk management liabilities under master netting arrangements and the remaining $11.0 million is classified as current risk management assets.
 
(3)This column reflects adjustments to our gross financial instrument assets and liabilities to reflect netting permitted under our master netting agreements and the relevant authoritative accounting literature. In addition, as of September 30, 2010 we had $24.9 million of cash held in margin accounts to collateralize certain financial instruments. Of this amount, $12.6 million was used to offset current risk management liabilities under master netting arrangements and the remaining $12.3 million is classified as current risk management assets.
 
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements
 
As discussed in Note 9, during the third quarter we performed an impairment assessment of certain natural gas gathering assets in our nonregulated segment. We used a combination of a market and income approach in a weighted average discounted cash flow analysis that included significant inputs such as our weighted average cost of capital and assumptions regarding future natural gas prices. This is a Level 3 fair value measurement because the inputs used are unobservable. Based on this analysis, we determined the assets to be impaired. We reduced the carrying value of the assets to their estimated fair value of approximately $6 million and recorded a pre-tax noncash impairment loss of approximately $11 million.
 
Other Fair Value Measures
 
Our debt is recorded at carrying value. The fair value of our debt is determined using third party market value quotations. The following table presents the carrying value and fair value of our debt as of June 30, 2011:
 
     
  June 30,
  2011
  (In thousands)
 
Carrying Amount
 $2,212,630 
Fair Value
 $2,474,064 
 
5.  Discontinued Operations
 
On May 12, 2011, we entered into a definitive agreement to sell all of our natural gas distribution assets located in Missouri, Illinois and Iowa to Liberty Energy (Midstates) Corporation, an affiliate of Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. for an all cash price of approximately $124 million. The agreement contains terms and conditions customary for transactions of this type, including typical adjustments to the purchase price at closing, if applicable. The closing of the transaction is subject to the satisfaction of customary conditions including the receipt of applicable regulatory approvals.
 
As required under generally accepted accounting principles, the operating results of our Missouri, Illinois and Iowa operations have been aggregated and reported on the condensed consolidated statements of income as income from discontinued operations, net of income tax. Expenses related to general corporate overhead and interest expense allocated to their operations are not included in discontinued operations.


20


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The tables below set forth selected financial and operational information related to net assets and operating results related to discontinued operations. Additionally, assets and liabilities related to our Missouri, Illinois and Iowa operations are classified as “held for sale” in other current assets and liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2011. Prior period revenues and expenses associated with these assets have been reclassified into discontinued operations. This reclassification had no impact on previously reported net income.
 
The following table presents statement of income data related to discontinued operations.
 
                 
  Three Months Ended
  Nine Months Ended
 
  June 30  June 30 
  2011  2010  2011  2010 
  (In thousands) 
 
Operating revenues
 $11,524  $8,952  $71,047  $62,121 
Purchased gas cost
  5,460   3,390   44,993   39,836 
                 
Gross profit
  6,064   5,562   26,054   22,285 
Operating expenses
  4,472   3,712   12,919   11,654 
                 
Operating income
  1,592   1,850   13,135   10,631 
Other nonoperating expense
  (94)  (75)  (159)  (264)
                 
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes
  1,498   1,775   12,976   10,367 
Income tax expense
  590   700   5,122   4,094 
                 
Net income
 $908  $1,075  $7,854  $6,273 
                 
 
The following table presents balance sheet data related to assets held for sale.
 
     
  June 30,
 
  2011 
  (In thousands) 
 
Net plant, property & equipment
 $126,375 
Gas stored underground
  5,938 
Other current assets
  431 
Deferred charges and other assets
  197 
     
Assets held for sale
 $132,941 
     
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
 $1,808 
Other current liabilities
  5,086 
Regulatory cost of removal obligation
  11,435 
Deferred credits and other liabilities
  810 
     
Liabilities held for sale
 $19,139 
     


21


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
6.  Debt
 
Long-term debt
 
Long-term debt at June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 consisted of the following:
 
         
  June 30,
  September 30,
 
  2011  2010 
  (In thousands) 
 
Unsecured 7.375% Senior Notes, redeemed May 2011
 $  $350,000 
Unsecured 10% Notes, due December 2011
  2,303   2,303 
Unsecured 5.125% Senior Notes, due 2013
  250,000   250,000 
Unsecured 4.95% Senior Notes, due 2014
  500,000   500,000 
Unsecured 6.35% Senior Notes, due 2017
  250,000   250,000 
Unsecured 8.50% Senior Notes, due 2019
  450,000   450,000 
Unsecured 5.95% Senior Notes, due 2034
  200,000   200,000 
Unsecured 5.50% Senior Notes, due 2041
  400,000    
Medium term notes
        
Series A,1995-2,6.27%, due December 2010
     10,000 
Series A,1995-1,6.67%, due 2025
  10,000   10,000 
Unsecured 6.75% Debentures, due 2028
  150,000   150,000 
Rental property term note due in installments through 2013
  327   393 
         
Total long-term debt
  2,212,630   2,172,696 
Less:
        
Original issue discount on unsecured senior notes and debentures
  (4,090)  (3,014)
Current maturities
  (2,434)  (360,131)
         
  $2,206,106  $1,809,551 
         
 
As noted above, our unsecured 10% notes will mature in December 2011; accordingly, these have been classified within the current maturities of long-term debt.
 
Our $350 million 7.375% senior notes were paid on their maturity date on May 15, 2011, using funds drawn from commercial paper. We replaced these senior notes on June 10, 2011 with $400 million 5.50% senior notes. The effective interest rate on these notes is 5.381 percent, after giving effect to offering costs and the settlement of the $300 million Treasury locks discussed in Note 3. The majority of the net proceeds of approximately $394 million was used to repay $350 million of outstanding commercial paper. The remainder of the net proceeds was used for general corporate purposes.
 
Short-term debt
 
Our short-term borrowing requirements are affected by the seasonal nature of the natural gas business. Changes in the price of natural gas and the amount of natural gas we need to supply our customers’ needs could significantly affect our borrowing requirements. Our short-term borrowings typically reach their highest levels in the winter months.
 
Prior to the third quarter of fiscal 2011, we financed our short-term borrowing requirements through a combination of a $566.7 million commercial paper program and four committed revolving credit facilities with third-party lenders that provided approximately $1.0 billion of working capital funding. On April 13, 2011, our $200 million180-dayunsecured credit facility expired and was not replaced. On May 2, 2011, we replaced our $566.7 million unsecured credit facility with a new five-year $750 million unsecured credit


22


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
facility with an accordion feature that could increase our borrowing capacity to $1.0 billion. As a result of these changes, we have $975 million of working capital funding from our commercial paper program and three committed revolving credit facilities with third-party lenders.
 
At June 30, 2011, there were no short-term debt borrowings outstanding. At September 30, 2010, there was a total of $126.1 million outstanding under our commercial paper program. We also use intercompany credit facilities to supplement the funding provided by these third-party committed credit facilities. These facilities are described in greater detail below.
 
Regulated Operations
 
We fund our regulated operations as needed, primarily through our commercial paper program and two committed revolving credit facilities with third-party lenders that provide approximately $775 million of working capital funding. The first facility is a five-year $750 million unsecured credit facility, expiring May 2016, that bears interest at a base rate or at a LIBOR- based rate for the applicable interest period, plus a spread ranging from zero percent to 2 percent, based on the Company’s credit ratings. This credit facility serves as a backup liquidity facility for our commercial paper program. At June 30, 2011, there were no borrowings under this facility nor was there any commercial paper outstanding.
 
The second facility is a $25 million unsecured facility that bears interest at a daily negotiated rate, generally based on the Federal Funds rate plus a variable margin. This facility was renewed effective April 1, 2011. At June 30, 2011, there were no borrowings outstanding under this facility.
 
The availability of funds under these credit facilities is subject to conditions specified in the respective credit agreements, all of which we currently satisfy. These conditions include our compliance with financial covenants and the continued accuracy of representations and warranties contained in these agreements. We are required by the financial covenants in each of these facilities to maintain, at the end of each fiscal quarter, a ratio of total debt to total capitalization of no greater than 70 percent. At June 30, 2011, our total-debt-to-total-capitalization ratio, as defined, was 51 percent. In addition, both the interest margin over the Eurodollar rate and the fees that we pay on unused amounts under each of these facilities are subject to adjustment depending upon our credit ratings.
 
In addition to these third-party facilities, our regulated operations have a $350 million intercompany revolving credit facility with AEH. This facility bears interest at the lower of (i) the one-month LIBOR rate plus 0.45 percent or (ii) the marginal borrowing rate available to the Company on the date of borrowing. The marginal borrowing rate is defined as the lower of (i) a rate based upon the lower of the Prime Rate or the Eurodollar rate under the five year revolving credit facility or (ii) the lowest rate outstanding under the commercial paper program. Applicable state regulatory commissions have approved our use of this facility through December 31, 2011. There was $173.8 million outstanding under this facility at June 30, 2011.
 
Nonregulated Operations
 
Atmos Energy Marketing, LLC (AEM), a wholly-owned subsidiary of AEH has a three-year $200 million committed revolving credit facility with a syndicate of third-party lenders with an accordion feature that could increase AEM’s borrowing capacity to $500 million. The credit facility is primarily used to issue letters of credit and, on a less frequent basis, to borrow funds for gas purchases and other working capital needs.
 
At AEM’s option, borrowings made under the credit facility are based on a base rate or an offshore rate, in each case plus an applicable margin. The base rate is a floating rate equal to the higher of: (a) 0.50 percent per annum above the latest Federal Funds rate; (b) the per annum rate of interest established by BNP Paribas from time to time as its “prime rate” or “base rate” for U.S. dollar loans; (c) an offshore rate (based on LIBOR with a three-month interest period) as in effect from time to time; or (d) the “cost of funds” rate which is the cost of funds as reasonably determined by the administrative agent. The offshore rate is a floating rate


23


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
equal to the higher of (a) an offshore rate based upon LIBOR for the applicable interest period; or (b) a “cost of funds” rate referred to above. In the case of both base rate and offshore rate loans, the applicable margin ranges from 1.875 percent to 2.25 percent per annum, depending on the excess tangible net worth of AEM, as defined in the credit facility. This facility has swing line loan features, which allow AEM to borrow, on a same day basis, an amount ranging from $6 million to $30 million based on the terms of an election within the agreement. This facility is collateralized by substantially all of the assets of AEM and is guaranteed by AEH.
 
At June 30, 2011, there were no borrowings outstanding under this credit facility. However, at June 30, 2011, AEM letters of credit totaling $24.8 million had been issued under the facility, which reduced the amount available by a corresponding amount. The amount available under this credit facility is also limited by various covenants, including covenants based on working capital. Under the most restrictive covenant, the amount available to AEM under this credit facility was $125.2 million at June 30, 2011.
 
AEM is required by the financial covenants in this facility to maintain a ratio of total liabilities to tangible net worth that does not exceed a maximum of 5 to 1. At June 30, 2011, AEM’s ratio of total liabilities to tangible net worth, as defined, was 1.34 to 1. Additionally, AEM must maintain minimum levels of net working capital and net worth ranging from $20 million to $40 million. As defined in the financial covenants, at June 30, 2011, AEM’s net working capital was $139.5 million and its tangible net worth was $150.9 million.
 
To supplement borrowings under this facility, AEH has a $350 million intercompany demand credit facility with AEC, which bears interest at a rate equal to the greater of (i) the one-month LIBOR rate plus 3.00 percent or (ii) the rate for AEM’s offshore borrowings under its committed credit facility plus 0.75 percent. Applicable state regulatory commissions have approved our use of this facility through December 31, 2011. There were no borrowings outstanding under this facility at June 30, 2011.
 
Shelf Registration
 
We have an effective shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that permits us to issue a total of $1.3 billion in common stockand/or debt securities. The shelf registration statement has been approved by all requisite state regulatory commissions. Due to certain restrictions imposed by one state regulatory commission on our ability to issue securities under the new registration statement, we were able to issue a total of $950 million in debt securities and $350 million in equity securities prior to our $400 million senior notes offering in June 2011. At June 30, 2011, $900 million remains available for issuance. Of this amount, $550 million is available for the issuance of debt securities and $350 million remains available for the issuance of equity securities under the shelf until March 2013.
 
Debt Covenants
 
In addition to the financial covenants described above, our credit facilities and public indentures contain usual and customary covenants for our business, including covenants substantially limiting liens, substantial asset sales and mergers.
 
Additionally, our public debt indentures relating to our senior notes and debentures, as well as our revolving credit agreements, each contain a default provision that is triggered if outstanding indebtedness arising out of any other credit agreements in amounts ranging from in excess of $15 million to in excess of $100 million becomes due by acceleration or is not paid at maturity.
 
Further, AEM’s credit agreement contains a cross-default provision whereby AEM would be in default if it defaults on other indebtedness, as defined, by at least $250 thousand in the aggregate.


24


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Finally, AEM’s credit agreement contains a provision that would limit the amount of credit available if Atmos Energy were downgraded below an S&P rating of BBB+ and a Moody’s rating of Baa1. We have no other triggering events in our debt instruments that are tied to changes in specified credit ratings or stock price, nor have we entered into any transactions that would require us to issue equity, based on our credit rating or other triggering events.
 
We were in compliance with all of our debt covenants as of June 30, 2011. If we were unable to comply with our debt covenants, we would likely be required to repay our outstanding balances on demand, provide additional collateral or take other corrective actions.
 
7.  Earnings Per Share
 
Since we have non-vested share-based payments with a nonforfeitable right to dividends or dividend equivalents (referred to as participating securities) we are required to use the two-class method of computing earnings per share. The Company’s non-vested restricted stock and restricted stock units, for which vesting is predicated solely on the passage of time granted under the 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan, are considered to be participating securities. The calculation of earnings per share using the two-class method excludes income attributable to these participating securities from the numerator and excludes the dilutive impact of those shares from the denominator. Basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are calculated as follows:
 
                 
  Three Months Ended
  Nine Months Ended
 
  June 30  June 30 
  2011  2010  2011  2010 
  (In thousands, except per share amounts) 
 
Basic Earnings Per Share from continuing operations
                
Income (loss) from continuing operations
 $(1,474) $(4,229) $197,786  $198,029 
Less: Income (loss) from continuing operations allocated to participating securities
  (32)  (51)  2,076   2,018 
                 
Income (loss) from continuing operations available to common shareholders
 $(1,442) $(4,178) $195,710  $196,011 
                 
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
  90,127   92,648   90,233   92,513 
                 
Income (loss) from continuing operations per share — Basic
 $(0.02) $(0.04) $2.17  $2.12 
                 
Basic Earnings Per Share from discontinued operations
                
Income from discontinued operations
 $908  $1,075  $7,854  $6,273 
Less: Income from discontinued operations allocated to participating securities
  20   13   82   64 
                 
Income from discontinued operations available to common shareholders
 $888  $1,062  $7,772  $6,209 
                 
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
  90,127   92,648   90,233   92,513 
                 
Income from discontinued operations per share — Basic
 $0.01  $0.01  $0.09  $0.07 
                 
Net income (loss) per share — Basic
 $(0.01) $(0.03) $2.26  $2.19 
                 


25


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
                 
  Three Months Ended
  Nine Months Ended
 
  June 30  June 30 
  2011  2010  2011  2010 
  (In thousands, except per share amounts) 
 
Diluted Earnings Per Share from continuing operations
                
Income (loss) from continuing operations available to common shareholders
 $(1,442) $(4,178) $195,710  $196,011 
Effect of dilutive stock options and other shares
        4   4 
                 
Income (loss) from continuing operations available to common shareholders
 $(1,442) $(4,178) $195,714  $196,015 
                 
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
  90,127   92,648   90,233   92,513 
Additional dilutive stock options and other shares
        297   343 
                 
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
  90,127   92,648   90,530   92,856 
                 
Income (loss) from continuing operations per share — Diluted
 $(0.02) $(0.04) $2.16  $2.11 
                 
Diluted Earnings Per Share from discontinued operations
                
Income from discontinued operations available to common shareholders
 $888  $1,062  $7,772  $6,209 
Effect of dilutive stock options and other shares
  2          
                 
Income from discontinued operations available to common shareholders
 $890  $1,062  $7,772  $6,209 
                 
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
  90,127   92,648   90,233   92,513 
Additional dilutive stock options and other shares
        297   343 
                 
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
  90,127   92,648   90,530   92,856 
                 
Income from discontinued operations per share — Diluted
 $0.01  $0.01  $0.09  $0.07 
                 
Net income (loss) per share — Diluted
 $(0.01) $(0.03) $2.25  $2.18 
                 
 
There were approximately 288,000 and 333,000 stock options and other shares excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 as their inclusion in the computation would be anti-dilutive.
 
There were noout-of-the-moneystock options excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 as their exercise price was less than the average market price of the common stock during that period.
 
On, July 1, 2010, we entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement with Goldman Sachs & Co. under which we repurchased $100 million of our outstanding common stock in order to offset stock grants made under our various employee and director incentive compensation plans. We paid $100 million to Goldman Sachs & Co. on July 7, 2010 for shares of Atmos Energy common stock in a share forward transaction and received and retired 2,958,580 shares. On March 4, 2011, we received and retired an additional 375,468 common shares which concluded our share repurchase agreement. In total, we received and retired 3,334,048 common shares under the repurchase agreement. The final number of shares we ultimately repurchased in the transaction was based generally on the average of the daily volume-weighted average share price of our common stock over the duration of the agreement. As a result of this transaction, beginning in our fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, the number of outstanding shares used to calculate our earnings per share was

26


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
reduced by the number of shares received and the $100 million purchase price was recorded as a reduction in shareholders’ equity.
 
8.  Interim Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plan Information
 
The components of our net periodic pension cost for our pension and other postretirement benefit plans for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are presented in the following table. Most of these costs are recoverable through our gas distribution rates; however, a portion of these costs is capitalized into our gas distribution rate base. The remaining costs are recorded as a component of operation and maintenance expense.
 
In August 2010, the Board of Directors of Atmos Energy approved a proposal to close the Pension Account Plan (PAP) to new participants, effective October 1, 2010. Employees participating in the PAP as of October 1, 2010 were allowed to make a one-time election to migrate from the PAP into our defined contribution plan with enhanced features, effective January 1, 2011. Participants who chose to remain in the PAP will continue to earn benefits and interest allocations with no changes to their existing benefits. During the election period, a limited number of participants chose to join the new plan, which resulted in an immaterial curtailment gain and a revaluation of the net periodic pension cost for the remainder of fiscal 2011. The curtailment gain was recorded in our second fiscal quarter. The revaluation of the net periodic pension cost resulted in an increase in the discount rate, effective January 1, 2011 to 5.68 percent, which will reduce our net periodic pension cost by approximately $1.8 million for the remainder of the fiscal year. All other actuarial assumptions remained unchanged.
 
                 
  Three Months Ended June 30 
  Pension Benefits  Other Benefits 
  2011  2010  2011  2010 
     (In thousands)    
 
Components of net periodic pension cost:
                
Service cost
 $4,257  $3,993  $3,601  $3,360 
Interest cost
  7,055   6,524   3,204   3,018 
Expected return on assets
  (6,285)  (6,320)  (681)  (615)
Amortization of transition asset
        377   377 
Amortization of prior service cost
  (106)  (193)  (362)  (375)
Amortization of actuarial loss
  2,748   2,822   87   93 
                 
Net periodic pension cost
 $7,669  $6,826  $6,226  $5,858 
                 
 
                 
  Nine Months Ended June 30 
  Pension Benefits  Other Benefits 
  2011  2010  2011  2010 
     (In thousands)    
 
Components of net periodic pension cost:
                
Service cost
 $12,894  $11,982  $10,803  $10,077 
Interest cost
  21,034   19,569   9,610   9,051 
Expected return on assets
  (18,533)  (18,960)  (2,045)  (1,845)
Amortization of transition asset
        1,133   1,134 
Amortization of prior service cost
  (323)  (582)  (1,087)  (1,125)
Amortization of actuarial loss
  8,990   8,469   260   282 
Curtailment gain
  (40)         
                 
Net periodic pension cost
 $24,022  $20,478  $18,674  $17,574 
                 


27


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The assumptions used to develop our net periodic pension cost for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:
 
                         
  Pension
 Other
  
  Account Plan Pension Benefits Other Benefits
  2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010
 
Discount rate
  5.68%  5.52%  5.39%  5.52%  5.39%  5.52%
Rate of compensation increase
  4.00%  4.00%  4.00%  4.00%  4.00%  4.00%
Expected return on plan assets
  8.25%  8.25%  8.25%  8.25%  5.00%  5.00%
 
The discount rate used to compute the present value of a plan’s liabilities generally is based on rates of high-grade corporate bonds with maturities similar to the average period over which the benefits will be paid. Generally, our funding policy has been to contribute annually an amount in accordance with the requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. In accordance with the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA), we determined the funded status of our plans as of January 1, 2011. Based upon this valuation, we will be required to contribute less than $2 million to our pension plans during fiscal 2011.
 
We contributed $8.7 million to our other post-retirement benefit plans during the nine months ended June 30, 2011. We expect to contribute a total of approximately $12 million to these plans during fiscal 2011.
 
For our Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans, we own equity securities that are classified asavailable-for-salesecurities. These securities are reported at market value with unrealized gains and losses shown as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). We regularly evaluate the performance of these investments on a fund by fund basis for impairment, taking into consideration the fund’s purpose, volatility and current returns. If a determination is made that a decline in fair value is other than temporary, the related fund is written down to its estimated fair value and theother-than-temporaryimpairment is recognized in the income statement.
 
Assets for the supplemental plans are held in separate rabbi trusts and comprise the following:
 
                 
     Gross
  Gross
    
  Amortized
  Unrealized
  Unrealized
    
  Cost  Gain  Loss  Fair Value 
  (In thousands) 
 
As of June 30, 2011:
                
Domestic equity mutual funds
 $27,593  $7,627  $     —  $35,220 
Foreign equity mutual funds
  4,597   1,416      6,013 
Money market funds
  2,812         2,812 
                 
  $35,002  $9,043  $  $44,045 
                 
As of September 30, 2010:
                
Domestic equity mutual funds
 $29,540  $5,698  $  $35,238 
Foreign equity mutual funds
  4,753   976      5,729 
Money market funds
  499         499 
                 
  $34,792  $6,674  $  $41,466 
                 
 
9.  Commitments and Contingencies
 
Litigation and Environmental Matters
 
With respect to the specific litigation and environmental-related matters or claims that were disclosed in Note 12 to the financial statements in our Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended September 30,


28


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
2010, except as noted below, there were no material changes in the status of such litigation and environmental-related matters or claims during the nine months ended June 30, 2011. We continue to believe that the final outcome of such litigation and environmental-related matters or claims will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
 
Since April 2009, Atmos Energy and two subsidiaries of AEH, AEM and Atmos Gathering Company, LLC (AGC) (collectively, the Atmos Entities), have been involved in a lawsuit filed in the Circuit Court of Edmonson County, Kentucky related to our Park City Gathering Project. The dispute which gave rise to the litigation involves the amount of royalties due from a third party producer to landowners (who own the mineral rights) for natural gas produced from the landowners’ properties. The third party producer was operating pursuant to leases between the landowners and certain investors/working interest owners. The third party producer filed a petition in bankruptcy, which was subsequently dismissed due to the lack of meaningful assets to reorganize or liquidate.
 
Although certain Atmos Energy companies entered into contracts with the third party producer to gather, treat and ultimately sell natural gas produced from the landowners’ properties, no Atmos Energy company had a contractual relationship with the landowners or the investors/working interest owners. After the lawsuit was filed, the landowners were successful in terminating for non-payment of royalties the leases related to the production of natural gas from their properties. Subsequent to termination, the investors/working interest owners under such leases filed additional claims against us for the termination of the leases.
 
During the trial, the landowners and the investors/working interest owners requested an award of compensatory damages plus punitive damages against us. On December 17, 2010, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the landowners and investor/working interest owners and awarded compensatory damages of $3.8 million and punitive damages of $27.5 million payable by Atmos Energy and the two AEH subsidiaries.
 
A hearing was held on February 28, 2011 to hear a number of motions, including a motion to dismiss the jury verdict and a motion for a new trial. The motions to dismiss the jury verdict and for a new trial were denied. However, the total punitive damages award was reduced from $27.5 million to $24.7 million. On March 30, 2011, we filed a notice of appeal of this ruling. We strongly believe that the trial court erred in not granting our motion to dismiss the lawsuit prior to trial and that the verdict is unsupported by law. After consultation with counsel, we believe that it is probable that any judgment based on this verdict will be overturned on appeal.
 
In addition, in a related development, on July 12, 2011, the Atmos Entities filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court, Western District of Kentucky against the third party producer and its affiliates to recover all costs, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by the Atmos Entities, which are associated with the defense and appeal of the case discussed above as well as for all damages awarded to the plaintiffs in such case against the Atmos Entities. The total amount of damages being claimed in the lawsuit is “open-ended” since the appellate process and related costs are ongoing. This lawsuit is based upon the indemnification provisions agreed to by the third party producer in favor of Atmos Gathering that are contained in an agreement entered into between Atmos Gathering and the third party producer in May 2009.
 
We have accrued what we believe is an adequate amount for the anticipated resolution of this matter; however, the amount accrued does not reflect the amount of the verdict. The Company does not have insurance coverage that could mitigate any losses that may arise from the resolution of this matter; however, we believe that the final outcome will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
 
In addition, we are involved in other litigation and environmental-related matters or claims that arise in the ordinary course of our business. While the ultimate results of such litigation and response actions to such environmental-related matters or claims cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe the final outcome of


29


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
such litigation and response actions will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
 
Purchase Commitments
 
AEH has commitments to purchase physical quantities of natural gas under contracts indexed to the forward NYMEX strip or fixed price contracts. At June 30, 2011, AEH was committed to purchase 104.5 Bcf within one year, 52.4 Bcf within one to three years and 2.4 Bcf after three years under indexed contracts. AEH is committed to purchase 2.6 Bcf within one year and 0.2 Bcf within one to three years under fixed price contracts with prices ranging from $4.13 to $6.36 per Mcf. Purchases under these contracts totaled $356.8 million and $315.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and $1,130.0 million and $1,208.4 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
 
Our natural gas distribution divisions, except for our Mid-Tex Division, maintain supply contracts with several vendors that generally cover a period of up to one year. Commitments for estimated base gas volumes are established under these contracts on a monthly basis at contractually negotiated prices. Commitments for incremental daily purchases are made as necessary during the month in accordance with the terms of the individual contract.
 
Our Mid-Tex Division maintains long-term supply contracts to ensure a reliable source of gas for our customers in its service area which obligate it to purchase specified volumes at market and fixed prices. The estimated commitments under these contracts as of June 30, 2011 are as follows (in thousands):
 
     
2011
 $52,703 
2012
  307,694 
2013
  112,319 
2014
  86,994 
2015
   
Thereafter
   
     
  $559,710 
     
 
Our nonregulated segment maintains long-term contracts related to storage and transportation. The estimated contractual demand fees for contracted storage and transportation under these contracts are detailed in our Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. There were no material changes to the estimated storage and transportation fees for the nine months ended June 30, 2011.
 
Regulatory Matters
 
As previously described in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, in December 2007, the Company received data requests from the Division of Investigations of the Office of Enforcement of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (the “Commission”) in connection with its investigation into possible violations of the Commission’s posting and competitive bidding regulations for pre-arranged released firm capacity on natural gas pipelines. There have been no material developments in this matter during the nine months ended June 30, 2011. We have accrued what we believe is an adequate amount for the anticipated resolution of this proceeding. While the ultimate resolution of this investigation cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe that the final outcome will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
 
We have been replacing certain steel service lines in our Mid-Tex Division since our acquisition of the natural gas distribution system in 2004. Since early 2010, we have been discussing the financial and


30


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
operational details of an accelerated steel service line replacement program with representatives of 440 municipalities served by our Mid-Tex Division. As previously discussed in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, all of the cities in our Mid-Tex Division have agreed to a program of installing 100,000 replacements during the next two years, with approved recovery of the associated return, depreciation and taxes. Under the terms of the agreement, the accelerated replacement program commenced in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, replacing 25,311 lines for a cost of $34.0 million as of June 30, 2011. The program is progressing on schedule for completion in September 2012.
 
In July 2010, the Dodd-Frank Act was enacted, representing an extensive overhaul of the framework for regulation of U.S. financial markets. The Dodd-Frank Act calls for various regulatory agencies, including the SEC and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission, to establish regulations for implementation of many of the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, which we expect will provide additional clarity regarding the extent of the impact of this legislation on us. The costs of participating in financial markets for hedging certain risks inherent in our business may be increased as a result of the new legislation. We may also incur additional costs associated with compliance with new regulations and anticipate additional reporting and disclosure obligations.
 
As of June 30, 2011, administrative reviews of our rate review mechanisms in our Mid-Tex and West Texas service areas were in progress and a gas reliability infrastructure program (GRIP) filing was in progress in our Atmos Pipeline — Texas service area. In addition, there were other ratemaking activities in progress in our Kentucky/Mid-States, West Texas and Louisiana service areas. These regulatory proceedings are discussed in further detail below in Management’s Discussion and Analysis — Recent Ratemaking Developments and Regulated Transmission and Storage Segment.
 
Other Matters
 
AGC owns and operates the Park City and Shrewsbury gathering systems in Kentucky. The Park City gathering system consists of a 23-milelow pressure pipeline and a nitrogen removal unit that was constructed in 2008. The Shrewsbury production, gathering and processing assets were acquired in 2008 at which time we sold the production assets to a third party. As a result of the sale of the production assets, we obtained a10-yearproduction payment note under which we are to be paid from future production generated from the assets.
 
As noted above, AGC is involved in an ongoing lawsuit with the Park City gathering system. Due to the lawsuit and a low natural gas price environment, the assets have generated operating losses. As a result of these developments, we performed an impairment assessment of these assets during the third fiscal quarter and determined the assets to be impaired. We reduced the carrying value of the assets to their estimated fair value based on the results of a weighted average discounted cash flow analysis and recorded a pretax noncash impairment loss of $11.0 million.
 
As we previously discussed in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, in February 2008, Atmos Pipeline and Storage, LLC, a subsidiary of AEH, announced plans to construct and operate a salt-cavern storage project in Franklin Parish, Louisiana. In March 2010, we entered into an option and acquisition agreement with a third party, which provided the third party with the exclusive option to develop the proposed Fort Necessity salt-dome natural gas storage project. In July 2010, we agreed with the third party to extend the option period to March 2011. In January 2011, the third party developer notified us that it did not plan to commence the activities required to allow it to exercise the option by March 2011; accordingly, the option was terminated. We evaluated our strategic alternatives and concluded the project’s returns did not meet our investment objectives. Accordingly, in March 2011, we recorded a $19.3 million pretax noncash impairment loss to write off substantially all of our investment in the project.


31


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
10.  Concentration of Credit Risk
 
Information regarding our concentration of credit risk is disclosed in Note 14 to the financial statements in our Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. During the nine months ended June 30, 2011, there were no material changes in our concentration of credit risk.
 
11.  Segment Information
 
Through November 30, 2010, our operations were divided into four segments:
 
  • The natural gas distribution segment, which included our regulated natural gas distribution and related sales operations.
 
  • The regulated transmission and storage segment, which included the regulated pipeline and storage operations of our Atmos Pipeline — Texas Division.
 
  • The natural gas marketing segment, which included a variety of nonregulated natural gas management services.
 
  • The pipeline, storage and other segment, which included our nonregulated natural gas gathering transmission and storage services.
 
As a result of the appointment of a new CEO effective October 1, 2010, during the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we revised the information used by the chief operating decision maker to manage the Company. As a result of this change, effective December 1, 2010, we began dividing our operations into the following three segments:
 
  • The natural gas distribution segment, remains unchanged and includes our regulated natural gas distribution and related sales operations.
 
  • The regulated transmission and storage segment, remains unchanged and includes the regulated pipeline and storage operations of our Atmos Pipeline — Texas Division.
 
  • The nonregulated segment, is comprised of our nonregulated natural gas management, nonregulated natural gas transmission, storage and other services which were previously reported in the natural gas marketing and pipeline, storage and other segments.
 
Our determination of reportable segments considers the strategic operating units under which we manage sales of various products and services to customers in differing regulatory environments. Although our natural gas distribution segment operations are geographically dispersed, they are reported as a single segment as each natural gas distribution division has similar economic characteristics. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies found in our Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. We evaluate performance based on net income or loss of the respective operating units.


32


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Income statements for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 by segment are presented in the following tables. Prior-year amounts have been restated to reflect the new operating segments.
 
                     
  Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 
  Natural
  Regulated
          
  Gas
  Transmission
          
  Distribution  and Storage  Nonregulated  Eliminations  Consolidated 
  (In thousands) 
 
Operating revenues from external parties
 $406,817  $19,772  $417,026  $  $843,615 
Intersegment revenues
  214   33,798   74,259   (108,271)   
                     
   407,031   53,570   491,285   (108,271)  843,615 
Purchased gas cost
  206,839      477,880   (107,909)  576,810 
                     
Gross profit
  200,192   53,570   13,405   (362)  266,805 
Operating expenses
                    
Operation and maintenance
  86,804   18,786   7,437   (362)  112,665 
Depreciation and amortization
  49,099   6,790   1,043      56,932 
Taxes, other than income
  47,534   3,729   879      52,142 
Asset impairments
        10,988      10,988 
                     
Total operating expenses
  183,437   29,305   20,347   (362)  232,727 
                     
Operating income (loss)
  16,755   24,265   (6,942)     34,078 
Miscellaneous income (expense)
  (1,153)  (312)  168   (133)  (1,430)
Interest charges
  28,042   7,653   283   (133)  35,845 
                     
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
  (12,440)  16,300   (7,057)     (3,197)
Income tax expense (benefit)
  (4,311)  5,748   (3,160)     (1,723)
                     
Income (loss) from continuing operations
  (8,129)  10,552   (3,897)     (1,474)
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
  908            908 
                     
Net income (loss)
 $(7,221) $10,552  $(3,897) $  $(566)
                     
Capital expenditures
 $121,452  $20,239  $1,929  $  $143,620 
                     
 


33


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
                     
  Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 
  Natural
  Regulated
          
  Gas
  Transmission
          
  Distribution  and Storage  Nonregulated  Eliminations  Consolidated 
  (In thousands) 
 
Operating revenues from external parties
 $396,097  $22,796  $342,412  $  $761,305 
Intersegment revenues
  222   22,161   84,993   (107,376)   
                     
   396,319   44,957   427,405   (107,376)  761,305 
Purchased gas cost
  204,988      415,634   (106,983)  513,639 
                     
Gross profit
  191,331   44,957   11,771   (393)  247,666 
Operating expenses
                    
Operation and maintenance
  87,323   16,050   8,579   (393)  111,559 
Depreciation and amortization
  45,633   5,171   1,136      51,940 
Taxes, other than income
  47,946   3,010   952      51,908 
                     
Total operating expenses
  180,902   24,231   10,667   (393)  215,407 
                     
Operating income
  10,429   20,726   1,104      32,259 
Miscellaneous income (expense)
  (72)  94   511   (1,331)  (798)
Interest charges
  29,019   7,667   1,912   (1,331)  37,267 
                     
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
  (18,662)  13,153   (297)     (5,806)
Income tax expense (benefit)
  (6,685)  4,688   420      (1,577)
                     
Income (loss) from continuing operations
  (11,977)  8,465   (717)     (4,229)
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
  1,075            1,075 
                     
Net income (loss)
 $(10,902) $8,465  $(717) $  $(3,154)
                     
Capital expenditures
 $106,394  $22,964  $362  $  $129,720 
                     
 

34


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
                     
  Nine Months Ended June 30, 2011 
  Natural
  Regulated
          
  Gas
  Transmission
          
  Distribution  and Storage  Nonregulated  Eliminations  Consolidated 
  (In thousands) 
 
Operating revenues from external parties
 $2,187,256  $62,602  $1,308,516  $  $3,558,374 
Intersegment revenues
  651   94,951   241,940   (337,542)   
                     
   2,187,907   157,553   1,550,456   (337,542)  3,558,374 
Purchased gas cost
  1,317,775      1,491,815   (336,413)  2,473,177 
                     
Gross profit
  870,132   157,553   58,641   (1,129)  1,085,197 
Operating expenses
                    
Operation and maintenance
  268,299   49,591   24,556   (1,129)  341,317 
Depreciation and amortization
  145,548   18,387   3,241      167,176 
Taxes, other than income
  132,070   11,395   2,403      145,868 
Asset impairments
        30,270      30,270 
                     
Total operating expenses
  545,917   79,373   60,470   (1,129)  684,631 
                     
Operating income (loss)
  324,215   78,180   (1,829)     400,566 
Miscellaneous income
  18,305   5,267   764   (290)  24,046 
Interest charges
  87,344   23,802   1,759   (290)  112,615 
                     
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
  255,176   59,645   (2,824)     311,997 
Income tax expense (benefit)
  94,323   21,252   (1,364)     114,211 
                     
Income (loss) from continuing operations
  160,853   38,393   (1,460)     197,786 
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
  7,854            7,854 
                     
Net income (loss)
 $168,707  $38,393  $(1,460) $  $205,640 
                     
Capital expenditures
 $340,713  $44,796  $4,774  $  $390,283 
                     
 

35


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
                     
  Nine Months Ended June 30, 2010 
  Natural
  Regulated
          
  Gas
  Transmission
          
  Distribution  and Storage  Nonregulated  Eliminations  Consolidated 
  (In thousands) 
 
Operating revenues from external parties
 $2,511,350  $64,281  $1,365,623  $  $3,941,254 
Intersegment revenues
  682   82,717   286,830   (370,229)   
                     
   2,512,032   146,998   1,652,453   (370,229)  3,941,254 
Purchased gas cost
  1,657,412      1,556,746   (369,017)  2,845,141 
                     
Gross profit
  854,620   146,998   95,707   (1,212)  1,096,113 
Operating expenses
                    
Operation and maintenance
  266,847   53,877   28,946   (1,212)  348,458 
Depreciation and amortization
  137,580   15,395   3,226      156,201 
Taxes, other than income
  140,234   9,226   3,380      152,840 
                     
Total operating expenses
  544,661   78,498   35,552   (1,212)  657,499 
                     
Operating income
  309,959   68,500   60,155      438,614 
Miscellaneous income (expense)
  1,474   117   1,524   (4,020)  (905)
Interest charges
  87,877   23,589   8,035   (4,020)  115,481 
                     
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
  223,556   45,028   53,644      322,228 
Income tax expense
  86,552   16,039   21,608      124,199 
                     
Income from continuing operations
  137,004   28,989   32,036      198,029 
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
  6,273            6,273 
                     
Net income
 $143,277  $28,989  $32,036  $  $204,302 
                     
Capital expenditures
 $302,621  $56,786  $2,942  $  $362,349 
                     

36


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Balance sheet information at June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 by segment is presented to reflect our business structure as of June 30, 2011 in the following tables. Prior-year amounts have been restated accordingly.
 
                     
  June 30, 2011 
  Natural
  Regulated
          
  Gas
  Transmission
          
  Distribution  and Storage  Nonregulated  Eliminations  Consolidated 
  (In thousands) 
 
ASSETS
Property, plant and equipment, net
 $4,085,081  $771,777  $59,193  $  $4,916,051 
Investment in subsidiaries
  671,885      (2,096)  (669,789)   
Current assets
                    
Cash and cash equivalents
  39,446      77,983      117,429 
Assets from risk management activities
  1,972      13,041      15,013 
Other current assets
  565,265   15,822   469,576   (193,357)  857,306 
Intercompany receivables
  505,709         (505,709)   
                     
Total current assets
  1,112,392   15,822   560,600   (699,066)  989,748 
Intangible assets
        363      363 
Goodwill
  572,262   132,341   34,711      739,314 
Noncurrent assets from risk management activities
  767      16      783 
Deferred charges and other assets
  319,019   16,137   12,055      347,211 
                     
  $6,761,406  $936,077  $664,842  $(1,368,855) $6,993,470 
                     
 
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES
Shareholders’ equity
 $2,335,824  $251,080  $420,805  $(671,885) $2,335,824 
Long-term debt
  2,205,910      196      2,206,106 
                     
Total capitalization
  4,541,734   251,080   421,001   (671,885)  4,541,930 
Current liabilities
                    
Current maturities of long-term debt
  2,303      131      2,434 
Short-term debt
  173,845         (173,845)   
Liabilities from risk management activities
  5,207      2,995      8,202 
Other current liabilities
  419,848   8,862   226,352   (17,416)  637,646 
Intercompany payables
     503,857   1,852   (505,709)   
                     
Total current liabilities
  601,203   512,719   231,330   (696,970)  648,282 
Deferred income taxes
  798,433   163,540   5,634      967,607 
Noncurrent liabilities from risk management activities
  56      6,089      6,145 
Regulatory cost of removal obligation
  396,201            396,201 
Deferred credits and other liabilities
  423,779   8,738   788      433,305 
                     
  $6,761,406  $936,077  $664,842  $(1,368,855) $6,993,470 
                     
 


37


Table of Contents

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
                     
  September 30, 2010 
  Natural
  Regulated
          
  Gas
  Transmission
          
  Distribution  and Storage  Nonregulated  Eliminations  Consolidated 
  (In thousands) 
 
ASSETS
Property, plant and equipment, net
 $3,959,112  $748,947  $85,016  $  $4,793,075 
Investment in subsidiaries
  620,863      (2,096)  (618,767)   
Current assets
                    
Cash and cash equivalents
  31,952      100,000      131,952 
Assets from risk management activities
  2,219      18,356      20,575 
Other current assets
  528,655   19,504   325,348   (150,842)  722,665 
Intercompany receivables
  546,313         (546,313)   
                     
Total current assets
  1,109,139   19,504   443,704   (697,155)  875,192 
Intangible assets
        834      834 
Goodwill
  572,262   132,341   34,711      739,314 
Noncurrent assets from risk management activities
  47      890      937 
Deferred charges and other assets
  324,707   13,037   16,695      354,439 
                     
  $6,586,130  $913,829  $579,754  $(1,315,922) $6,763,791 
                     
 
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES
Shareholders’ equity
 $2,178,348  $212,687  $408,176  $(620,863) $2,178,348 
Long-term debt
  1,809,289      262      1,809,551 
                     
Total capitalization
  3,987,637   212,687   408,438   (620,863)  3,987,899 
Current liabilities
                    
Current maturities of long-term debt
  360,000      131      360,131 
Short-term debt
  258,488         (132,388)  126,100 
Liabilities from risk management activities
  48,942      731      49,673 
Other current liabilities
  473,076   10,949   162,508   (16,358)  630,175 
Intercompany payables
     543,007   3,306   (546,313)   
                     
Total current liabilities
  1,140,506   553,956   166,676   (695,059)  1,166,079 
Deferred income taxes
  691,126   142,337   (4,335)     829,128 
Noncurrent liabilities from risk management activities
  2,924      6,000      8,924 
Regulatory cost of removal obligation
  350,521            350,521 
Deferred credits and other liabilities
  413,416   4,849   2,975      421,240 
                     
  $6,586,130  $913,829  $579,754  $(1,315,922) $6,763,791 
                     

38


Table of Contents

 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Atmos Energy Corporation
 
We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of Atmos Energy Corporation as of June 30, 2011, the related condensed consolidated statements of income for the three-month and nine-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.
 
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
 
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
 
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Atmos Energy Corporation as of September 30, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, not presented herein, and in our report dated November 12, 2010, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2010, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
 
/s/  Ernst & Young LLP
 
Dallas, Texas
August 4, 2011


39


Table of Contents

 
Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
INTRODUCTION
 
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Qand Management’s Discussion and Analysis in our Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the year ended September 30, 2010.
 
Cautionary Statement for the Purposes of the Safe Harbor under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
 
The statements contained in this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Qmay contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Report are forward-looking statements made in good faith by us and are intended to qualify for the safe harbor from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in this Report, or any other of our documents or oral presentations, the words “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “expect”, “forecast”, “goal”, “intend”, “objective”, “plan”, “projection”, “seek”, “strategy” or similar words are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the statements relating to our strategy, operations, markets, services, rates, recovery of costs, availability of gas supply and other factors. These risks and uncertainties include the following: our ability to continue to access the credit markets to satisfy our liquidity requirements; the impact of adverse economic conditions on our customers; increased costs of providing pension and postretirement health care benefits and increased funding requirements along with increased costs of health care benefits; market risks beyond our control affecting our risk management activities including market liquidity, commodity price volatility, increasing interest rates and counterparty creditworthiness; regulatory trends and decisions, including the impact of rate proceedings before various state regulatory commissions; possible increased federal, state and local regulation of the safety of our operations; increased federal regulatory oversight and potential penalties; the impact of environmental regulations on our business; the impact of possible future additional regulatory and financial risks associated with global warming and climate change on our business; the concentration of our distribution, pipeline and storage operations in Texas; adverse weather conditions; the effects of inflation and changes in the availability and price of natural gas; the capital-intensive nature of our gas distribution business; increased competition from energy suppliers and alternative forms of energy; the inherent hazards and risks involved in operating our gas distribution business, natural disasters, terrorist activities or other events, and other risks and uncertainties discussed herein, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control. Accordingly, while we believe these forward-looking statements to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that they will approximate actual experience or that the expectations derived from them will be realized. Further, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any of our forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
 
OVERVIEW
 
Atmos Energy and our subsidiaries are engaged primarily in the regulated natural gas distribution and transportation and storage businesses as well as other nonregulated natural gas businesses. We distribute natural gas through sales and transportation arrangements to over three million residential, commercial, public authority and industrial customers throughout our six regulated natural gas distribution divisions, which cover service areas currently located in 12 states. In addition, we transport natural gas for others through our regulated distribution and pipeline systems. In May 2011, we announced that we had entered into a definitive agreement to sell our natural gas distribution operations in Missouri, Illinois and Iowa, representing approximately 84,000 customers. After the closing of this transaction, we will operate in nine states.
 
Through our nonregulated businesses, we primarily provide natural gas management and marketing services to municipalities, other local gas distribution companies and industrial customers primarily in the Midwest and Southeast and natural gas transportation and storage services to certain of our natural gas


40


Table of Contents

distribution divisions and to third parties. Through our asset optimization activities, we also seek to maximize the economic value associated with the storage and transportation capacity we own or control.
 
As discussed in Note 11, we operate the Company through the following three segments:
 
  • the natural gas distribution segment, which includes our regulated natural gas distribution and related sales operations,
 
  • the regulated transmission and storage segment, which includes the regulated pipeline and storage operations of our Atmos Pipeline — Texas Division and
 
  • the nonregulated segment, which includes our nonregulated natural gas management, nonregulated natural gas transmission, storage and other services.
 
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND POLICIES
 
Our condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We based our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to risk management and trading activities, the allowance for doubtful accounts, legal and environmental accruals, insurance accruals, pension and postretirement obligations, deferred income taxes and the valuation of goodwill, indefinite-lived intangible assets and other long-lived assets. Actual results may differ from such estimates.
 
Our critical accounting policies used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements are described in our Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 and include the following:
 
  • Regulation
 
  • Revenue Recognition
 
  • Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
 
  • Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities
 
  • Impairment Assessments
 
  • Pension and Other Postretirement Plans
 
  • Fair Value Measurements
 
Our critical accounting policies are reviewed quarterly by the Audit Committee. There were no significant changes to these critical accounting policies during the nine months ended June 30, 2011.
 
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
Due to the seasonality of our distribution business, we typically incur a net loss in our fiscal third quarter. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, we reported a net loss of $0.6 million, or $0.01 per diluted share compared to a net loss of $3.2 million, or $0.03 per diluted share in the prior-year quarter. The net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2011 includes noncash, unrealized net gains of $0.1 million, or $0.00 per diluted share compared with net losses of $11.1 million, or $0.12 per diluted share for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The net loss for the third quarter includes the impact of the non-cash impairment charge related to Atmos Gathering System assets, totaling $6.1 million or $0.06 per diluted share.
 
Excluding the impact of unrealized margins and one-time items, diluted earnings per share decreased from income of $0.09 per diluted share in the prior-year quarter to income of $0.05 per diluted share in the current-year quarter, primarily due a decrease in asset optimization margins in our nonregulated segment,


41


Table of Contents

partially offset by rate increases in our natural gas distribution and regulated transmission and storage segments.
 
During the current quarter, we announced the sale of our natural gas distribution operations in our Missouri, Illinois and Iowa service areas. Due to the pending sales transaction, the results of operations for these three service areas are shown in discontinued operations. During the current-year quarter, discontinued operations generated net income of $0.9 million, or $0.01 per diluted share, compared with net income of $1.1 million, or $0.01 per diluted share in the prior-year quarter. Continuing operations in the current quarter generated a net loss of $1.5 million or $0.02 per diluted share, compared with a net loss of $4.2 million or $0.04 per diluted share from continuing operations in the prior-year quarter.
 
We reported net income of $205.6 million, or $2.25 per diluted share for the nine months ended June 30, 2011, compared with net income of $204.3 million or $2.18 per diluted share in the prior-year period. Income from continuing operations was $197.8 million, or $2.16 per diluted share compared with $198.0 million, or $2.11 per diluted share in the prior-year period. Income from discontinued operations was $7.9 million or $0.09 per diluted share for theyear-to-dateperiod, compared with $6.3 million or $0.07 per diluted share in the prior year. Unrealized losses in our nonregulated operations during the current period reduced net income by $1.4 million or $0.02 per diluted share compared with net losses recorded in the prior-year period of $6.2 million, or $0.07 per diluted share. Additionally, net income in both periods was impacted by nonrecurring items. In the prioryear-to-dateperiod, net income included the net positive impact of a state sales tax refund of $4.5 million, or $0.05 per diluted share. In the currentyear-to-dateperiod, net income includes the net positive impact of several one-time items totaling $6.5 million, or $0.07 per diluted share related to the following pre-tax amounts:
 
  • $27.8 million favorable impact related to the cash gain recorded in association with the unwinding of two Treasury locks in conjunction with the cancellation of a planned debt offering in November 2011.
 
  • $30.3 million unfavorable impact related to the non-cash impairment of certain assets in our nonregulated business.
 
  • $5.0 million favorable impact related to the administrative settlement of various income tax positions.
 
On June 10, 2011 we issued $400 million of 5.50% senior notes. The effective interest rate on these notes is 5.381 percent, after giving effect to the settlement of the $300 million Treasury locks associated with the offering. The majority of the net proceeds of approximately $394 million was used to repay $350 million of outstanding commercial paper. The remainder of the net proceeds was used for general corporate purposes. The Treasury locks were settled on June 7, 2011 with the receipt of $20.1 million from the counterparties due to an increase in the30-yearTreasury lock rates between inception of the Treasury locks and settlement. Because the Treasury locks were effective, the net $12.6 million unrealized gain was recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income and will be recognized as a component of interest expense over the30-year life of the senior notes.
 
During the nine months ended June 30, 2011, we executed on our strategy to streamline our credit facilities, as follows.
 
  • On May 2, 2011, we replaced our five-year $566.7 million unsecured credit facility, due to expire in December 2011, with a five-year $750 million unsecured credit facility with an accordion feature that could increase our borrowing capacity to $1.0 billion.
 
  • In December 2010, we replaced AEM’s $450 million364-dayfacility with a $200 million, three-year facility. The reduced amount of the new facility is due to the current low cost of gas and certain regulatory restrictions; however, this facility contains an accordion feature that could increase our borrowing capacity to $500 million.
 
  • In October 2010, we replaced our $200 million364-dayrevolving credit agreement with a $200 million180-dayrevolving credit agreement that expired in April 2011. As planned, we did not replace or extend this agreement.


42


Table of Contents

 
After giving effect to these changes, we now have $975 million of liquidity available to us from our commercial paper program and three committed credit facilities and have reduced our financing costs. We believe this availability provides sufficient liquidity to fund our working capital needs.
 
The following table presents our consolidated financial highlights for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
 
                 
  Three Months Ended
 Nine Months Ended
  June 30 June 30
  2011 2010 2011 2010
  (In thousands, except per share data)
 
Operating revenues
 $843,615  $761,305  $3,558,374  $3,941,254 
Gross profit
  266,805   247,666   1,085,197   1,096,113 
Operating expenses
  232,727   215,407   684,631   657,499 
Operating income
  34,078   32,259   400,566   438,614 
Miscellaneous income (expense)
  (1,430)  (798)  24,046   (905)
Interest charges
  35,845   37,267   112,615   115,481 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
  (3,197)  (5,806)  311,997   322,228 
Income tax expense (benefit)
  (1,723)  (1,577)  114,211   124,199 
Income (loss) from continuing operations
  (1,474)  (4,229)  197,786   198,029 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
  908   1,075   7,854   6,273 
Net income (loss)
 $(566) $(3,154) $205,640  $204,302 
Diluted net income (loss) per share from continuing operations
 $(0.02) $(0.04) $2.16  $2.11 
Diluted net income per share from discontinued operations
  0.01   0.01   0.09   0.07 
Diluted net income (loss) per share
 $(0.01) $(0.03) $2.25  $2.18 
 
The following tables segregate our consolidated net income (loss) and diluted earnings per share between our regulated and nonregulated operations:
 
             
  Three Months Ended June 30 
  2011  2010  Change 
  (In thousands, except per share data) 
 
Regulated operations
 $2,423  $(3,512) $5,935 
Nonregulated operations
  (3,897)  (717)  (3,180)
             
Net loss from continuing operations
  (1,474)  (4,229)  2,755 
Net income from discontinued operations
  908   1,075   (167)
             
Net loss
 $(566) $(3,154) $2,588 
             
Diluted EPS from continuing regulated operations
 $0.02  $(0.03) $0.05 
Diluted EPS from nonregulated operations
  (0.04)  (0.01)  (0.03)
             
Diluted EPS from continuing operations
  (0.02)  (0.04)  0.02 
Diluted EPS from discontinued operations
  0.01   0.01    
             
Consolidated diluted EPS
 $(0.01) $(0.03) $0.02 
             
 


43


Table of Contents

             
  Nine Months Ended June 30 
  2011  2010  Change 
  (In thousands, except per share data) 
 
Regulated operations
 $199,246  $165,993  $33,253 
Nonregulated operations
  (1,460)  32,036   (33,496)
             
Net income from continuing operations
  197,786   198,029   (243)
Net income from discontinued operations
  7,854   6,273   1,581 
             
Net income
 $205,640  $204,302  $1,338 
             
Diluted EPS from continuing regulated operations
 $2.18  $1.77  $0.41 
Diluted EPS from nonregulated operations
  (0.02)  0.34   (0.36)
             
Diluted EPS from continuing operations
  2.16   2.11   0.05 
Diluted EPS from discontinued operations
  0.09   0.07   0.02 
             
Consolidated diluted EPS
 $2.25  $2.18  $0.07 
             
 
Natural Gas Distribution Segment
 
The primary factors that impact the results of our natural gas distribution operations are our ability to earn our authorized rates of return, the cost of natural gas, competitive factors in the energy industry and economic conditions in our service areas.
 
Our ability to earn our authorized rates of return is based primarily on our ability to improve the rate design in our various ratemaking jurisdictions by reducing or eliminating regulatory lag and, ultimately, separating the recovery of our approved margins from customer usage patterns. Improving rate design is a long-term process and is further complicated by the fact that we operate in multiple rate jurisdictions.
 
Seasonal weather patterns can also affect our natural gas distribution operations. However, the effect of weather that is above or below normal is substantially offset through weather normalization adjustments, known as WNA, which has been approved by state regulatory commissions for approximately 90 percent of our residential and commercial meters in the following states for the following time periods:
 
   
Georgia, Kansas, West Texas
 October — May
Kentucky, Mississippi, Tennessee, Mid-Tex
 November — April
Louisiana
 December — March
Virginia
 January — December
 
Our natural gas distribution operations are also affected by the cost of natural gas. The cost of gas is passed through to our customers without markup. Therefore, increases in the cost of gas are offset by a corresponding increase in revenues. Accordingly, we believe gross profit is a better indicator of our financial performance than revenues. However, gross profit in our Texas and Mississippi service areas includes franchise fees and gross receipts taxes, which are calculated as a percentage of revenue (inclusive of gas costs). Therefore, the amount of these taxes included in revenues is influenced by the cost of gas and the level of gas sales volumes. We record the associated tax expense as a component of taxes, other than income. Although changes in these revenue-related taxes arising from changes in gas costs affect gross profit, over time the impact is offset within operating income.
 
Higher gas costs may also adversely impact our accounts receivable collections, resulting in higher bad debt expense and may require us to increase borrowings under our credit facilities resulting in higher interest expense. Finally, higher gas costs, as well as competitive factors in the industry and general economic conditions may cause customers to conserve or use alternative energy sources.
 
In May 2011, we announced that we had entered into a definitive agreement to sell our natural gas distribution operations in Missouri, Illinois and Iowa. The results of these operations have been separately

44


Table of Contents

reported in the following tables and exclude general corporate overhead and interest expense that would normally be allocated to these operations.
 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 compared with Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
 
Financial and operational highlights for our natural gas distribution segment for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are presented below.
 
             
  Three Months Ended June 30 
  2011  2010  Change 
  (In thousands, unless otherwise noted) 
 
Gross profit
 $200,192  $191,331  $8,861 
Operating expenses
  183,437   180,902   2,535 
             
Operating income
  16,755   10,429   6,326 
Miscellaneous expense
  (1,153)  (72)  (1,081)
Interest charges
  28,042   29,019   (977)
             
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
  (12,440)  (18,662)  6,222 
Income tax benefit
  (4,311)  (6,685)  2,374 
             
Loss from continuing operations
  (8,129)  (11,977)  3,848 
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
  908   1,075   (167)
             
Net loss
 $(7,221) $(10,902) $3,681 
             
Consolidated natural gas distribution sales volumes from continuing operations — MMcf
  37,011   35,613   1,398 
Consolidated natural gas distribution transportation volumes from continuing operations — MMcf
  29,955   27,956   1,999 
             
Consolidated natural gas distribution throughput from continuing operations — MMcf
  66,966   63,569   3,397 
Consolidated natural gas distribution throughput from discontinued operations — MMcf
  2,128   2,359   (231)
             
Total consolidated natural gas distribution throughput — MMcf
  69,094   65,928   3,166 
             
Consolidated natural gas distribution average transportation revenue per Mcf
 $0.46  $0.46  $ 
Consolidated natural gas distribution average cost of gas per Mcf sold
 $5.59  $5.73  $(0.14)


45


Table of Contents

The following table shows our operating income (loss) from continuing operations by natural gas distribution division, in order of total rate base, for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. The presentation of our natural gas distribution operating income (loss) is included for financial reporting purposes and may not be appropriate for ratemaking purposes.
 
             
  Three Months Ended June 30 
  2011  2010  Change 
  (In thousands) 
 
Mid-Tex
 $759  $(2,179) $2,938 
Kentucky/Mid-States
  4,832   3,344   1,488 
Louisiana
  6,779   6,537   242 
West Texas
  605   (104)  709 
Colorado-Kansas
  3,304   1,623   1,681 
Mississippi
  (615)  950   (1,565)
Other
  1,091   258   833 
             
Total
 $16,755  $10,429  $6,326 
             
 
The $8.9 million increase in natural gas distribution gross profit was primarily due to the following:
 
  • $7.5 million net increase in rate adjustments, primarily in the Mid-Tex, Kentucky and Kansas service areas.
 
  • $1.2 million increase in consolidated throughput due to a five percent increase in consolidated distribution throughput, primarily from higher consumption.
 
  • $1.5 million decrease due to lower revenue-related taxes, offset by a decrease in taxes, other than income.
 
Operating expenses, which include operation and maintenance expense, provision for doubtful accounts, depreciation and amortization expense and taxes, other than income increased $2.5 million due primarily to a $3.5 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense, partially offset by $1.4 million lower employee expenses.


46


Table of Contents

Nine Months Ended June 30, 2011 compared with Nine Months Ended June 30, 2010
 
Financial and operational highlights for our natural gas distribution segment for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are presented below.
 
             
  Nine Months Ended
 
  June 30 
  2011  2010  Change 
  (In thousands, unless otherwise noted) 
 
Gross profit
 $870,132  $854,620  $15,512 
Operating expenses
  545,917   544,661   1,256 
             
Operating income
  324,215   309,959   14,256 
Miscellaneous income
  18,305   1,474   16,831 
Interest charges
  87,344   87,877   (533)
             
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
  255,176   223,556   31,620 
Income tax expense
  94,323   86,552   7,771 
             
Income from continuing operations
  160,853   137,004   23,849 
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
  7,854   6,273   1,581 
             
Net income
 $168,707  $143,277  $25,430 
             
Consolidated natural gas distribution sales volumes from continuing operations — MMcf
  253,665   285,996   (32,331)
Consolidated natural gas distribution transportation volumes from continuing operations — MMcf
  99,551   98,442   1,109 
             
Consolidated natural gas distribution throughput from continuing operations — MMcf
  353,216   384,438   (31,222)
Consolidated natural gas distribution throughput from discontinued operations — MMcf
  12,723   13,835   (1,112)
             
Total consolidated natural gas distribution throughput — MMcf
  365,939   398,273   (32,334)
             
Consolidated natural gas distribution average transportation revenue per Mcf
 $0.47  $0.46  $0.01 
Consolidated natural gas distribution average cost of gas per Mcf sold
 $5.21  $5.77  $(0.56)
 
The following table shows our operating income from continuing operations by natural gas distribution division, in order of rate base, for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. The presentation of our


47


Table of Contents

natural gas distribution operating income is included for financial reporting purposes and may not be appropriate for ratemaking purposes.
 
             
  Nine Months Ended
 
  June 30 
  2011  2010  Change 
  (In thousands) 
 
Mid-Tex
 $140,674  $128,045  $12,629 
Kentucky/Mid-States
  50,522   43,791   6,731 
Louisiana
  44,975   42,775   2,200 
West Texas
  29,405   33,053   (3,648)
Colorado-Kansas
  26,256   24,071   2,185 
Mississippi
  27,604   28,604   (1,000)
Other
  4,779   9,620   (4,841)
             
Total
 $324,215  $309,959  $14,256 
             
 
The $15.5 million increase in natural gas distribution gross profit primarily reflects a $35.8 million net increase in rate adjustments, primarily in the Mid-Tex, Louisiana, Kentucky, Kansas and Georgia service areas.
 
These increases were partially offset by:
 
  • $11.2 million decrease due to an eight percent decrease in consolidated throughput caused principally by lower residential and commercial consumption combined with warmer weather this fiscal year compared to the same period last year in most of our service areas.
 
  • $8.5 million decrease in revenue-related taxes, primarily due to lower revenues on which the tax is calculated.
 
Operating expenses, which include operation and maintenance expense, provision for doubtful accounts, depreciation and amortization expense and taxes, other than income increased $1.3 million, primarily due to the following:
 
  • $7.4 million increase due to the absence of a state sales tax refund received in the prior year.
 
  • $8.0 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense.
 
  • $1.2 million increase in vehicles and equipment expense.
 
These increases were partially offset by:
 
  • $8.2 million decrease in taxes, other than income, due to lower revenue-related taxes.
 
  • $6.8 million decrease in employee-related expenses.
 
Net income for this segment for theyear-to-dateperiod was also favorably impacted by a $21.8 million gain recognized in March 2011 as a result of unwinding two Treasury locks and a $5.0 million income tax benefit related to the administrative settlement of various income tax positions.
 
Recent Ratemaking Developments
 
Significant ratemaking developments that occurred during the nine months ended June 30, 2011 are discussed below. The amounts described below represent the operating income that was requested or received in each rate filing, which may not necessarily reflect the stated amount referenced in the final order, as certain operating costs may have changed as a result of a commission’s or other governmental authority’s final ruling.


48


Table of Contents

Annual net operating income increases totaling $28.1 million resulting from ratemaking activity became effective in the nine months ended June 30, 2011 as summarized below:
 
     
  Annual Increase to
 
Rate Action
 Operating Income 
  (In thousands) 
 
GRIP filings
 $919 
Annual rate filing mechanisms
  25,070 
Other rate activity
  2,075 
     
  $28,064 
     
 
Additionally, the following ratemaking efforts were in progress during the third quarter of fiscal 2011 but had not been completed as of June 30, 2011.
 
         
      Operating
 
      Income
 
Division
 
Rate Action
 
Jurisdiction
 Requested 
      (In thousands) 
 
Kentucky/Mid-States
 PRP(1) Georgia $1,192 
Louisiana
 LGS RSC(2) Louisiana  4,600 
Mid-Tex
 Rate Review Mechanism (RRM)(3) Settled Cities(4)  13,152 
West Texas
 Environs Rate Case(5) Amarillo  78 
  RRM Lubbock  2,136 
  RRM(6) WT Cities  2,552 
  Special Contract Triangle  641 
         
      $24,351 
         
 
 
(1)The Pipeline Replacement Program (PRP) surcharge relates to a long-term cast iron replacement program.
 
(2)The Louisiana Commission Staff recommended an increase of $4.1 million effective July 1, 2011, which the Commission accepted.
 
(3)The amount requested represents an increase of $7.7 million under the RRM and $5.5 million related to year two of our steel service line program. In July 2011, the Company and representatives of the Settled Cities agreed to no change in operating income under the RRM and an operating income increase of $5.5 million related to the steel service line program to be implemented on September 1, 2011.
 
(4)Represents 439 of the 440 incorporated cities, or approximately 80 percent of the Mid-Tex Division’s customers, with whom a settlement agreement was reached during the fiscal 2008 second quarter.
 
(5)The Railroad Commission of Texas (RRC) approved the requested increase in operating income on July 26, 2011.
 
(6)On August 1, 2011, the Company and representatives of the West Texas Cities agreed to resolve the 2010 RRM with no change to operating income.
 
Rate Filings
 
A rate case is a formal request from Atmos Energy to a regulatory authority to increase rates that are charged to our customers. Rate cases may also be initiated when the regulatory authorities request us to justify our rates. This process is referred to as a “show cause” action. Adequate rates are intended to provide for recovery of the Company’s costs as well as a fair rate of return to our shareholders and ensure that we continue to deliver reliable, reasonably priced natural gas service to our customers. There were no rate cases completed within our natural gas distribution segment for the first three quarters of fiscal 2011.


49


Table of Contents

GRIP Filings
 
The Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program (GRIP) in Texas allows us to include in our rate base annually approved capital costs incurred in the prior calendar year provided that we file a complete rate case at least once every five years. The following table summarizes our GRIP filings with effective dates during the nine months ended June 30, 2011.
 
             
       Additional
   
    Incremental
  Annual
   
  Calendar
 Net Utility Plant
  Operating
  Effective
Division
 Year Investment  Income  Date
    (In thousands)  (In thousands)   
 
2011 GRIP:
            
West Texas/Lubbock & WT Cities Environs
 2010 $17,677  $343  06/01/2011
Mid-Tex/Environs
 2010  107,840   576  06/27/2011
             
Total 2011 GRIP
   $125,517  $919   
             
 
Annual Rate Filing Mechanisms
 
As an instrument to reduce regulatory lag, annual rate filing mechanisms allow us to refresh our rates on a periodic basis without filing a formal rate case. However, these filings still involve discovery by the appropriate regulatory authorities prior to the final determination of rates under these mechanisms. We currently have annual rate filing mechanisms in our Louisiana and Mississippi divisions and in significant portions of our Mid-Tex and West Texas divisions. These mechanisms are referred to as rate review mechanisms in our Mid-Tex and West Texas divisions, stable rate filings in the Mississippi Division and a rate stabilization clause in the Louisiana Division. The following table summarizes filings made under our various annual rate filing mechanisms for the nine months ended June 30, 2011.
 
             
      Additional
    
      Annual
    
    Test Year
 Operating
  Effective
 
Division
 Jurisdiction Ended Income  Date 
      (In thousands)    
 
2011 Filings:
            
Mid-Tex
 Settled Cities 12/31/2009 $23,122   10/01/2010 
Louisiana
 TransLa 09/30/2010  350   04/01/2011 
Mid-Tex
 Dallas 12/31/2010  1,598   07/01/2011 
             
Total 2011 Filings
     $25,070     
             
 
Other Ratemaking Activity
 
The following table summarizes other ratemaking activity during the nine months ended June 30, 2011:
 
           
      Additional
   
      Annual
   
      Operating
  Effective
Division
 Jurisdiction Rate Activity Income  Date
      (In thousands)   
 
2011 Other Rate Activity:
          
Kentucky/Mid-States
 Georgia PRP Surcharge $764  10/01/2010
Colorado-Kansas
 Colorado AMI(1)  349  12/01/2010
Colorado-Kansas
 Kansas Ad Valorem(2)  685  01/01/2011
Kentucky/Mid-States
 Missouri ISRS(3)  277  02/14/2011
           
Total 2011 Other Rate Activity
     $2,075   
           


50


Table of Contents

 
(1)Automated Meter Infrastructure (AMI) relates to a pilot program in the Weld County area of the Company’s service area.
 
(2)The Ad Valorem filing relates to a collection of property taxes in excess of the amount included in the Company’s base rates.
 
(3)Infrastructure System Replacement Surcharge (ISRS) relates to maintenance capital investments made since the previous rate case.
 
Regulated Transmission and Storage Segment
 
Our regulated transmission and storage segment consists of the regulated pipeline and storage operations of the Atmos Pipeline — Texas Division. The Atmos Pipeline — Texas Division transports natural gas to our Mid-Tex Division and third parties and manages five underground storage reservoirs in Texas. We also provide ancillary services customary in the pipeline industry including parking and lending arrangements and sales of inventory on hand.
 
Similar to our natural gas distribution segment, our regulated transmission and storage segment is impacted by seasonal weather patterns, competitive factors in the energy industry and economic conditions in our service areas. Further, as the Atmos Pipeline — Texas Division operations supply all of the natural gas for our Mid-Tex Division, the results of this segment are highly dependent upon the natural gas requirements of the Mid-Tex Division. Finally, as a regulated pipeline, the operations of the Atmos Pipeline — Texas Division may be impacted by the timing of when costs and expenses are incurred and when these costs and expenses are recovered through its tariffs.
 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 compared with Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
 
Financial and operational highlights for our regulated transmission and storage segment for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are presented below.
 
             
  Three Months Ended
 
  June 30 
  2011  2010  Change 
  (In thousands, unless otherwise noted) 
 
Mid-Tex transportation
 $32,098  $21,908  $10,190 
Third-party transportation
  16,518   17,521   (1,003)
Storage and park and lend services
  1,802   2,646   (844)
Other
  3,152   2,882   270 
             
Gross profit
  53,570   44,957   8,613 
Operating expenses
  29,305   24,231   5,074 
             
Operating income
  24,265   20,726   3,539 
Miscellaneous income (expense)
  (312)  94   (406)
Interest charges
  7,653   7,667   (14)
             
Income before income taxes
  16,300   13,153   3,147 
Income tax expense
  5,748   4,688   1,060 
             
Net income
 $10,552  $8,465  $2,087 
             
Gross pipeline transportation volumes — MMcf
  141,294   127,861   13,433 
             
Consolidated pipeline transportation volumes — MMcf
  112,564   100,770   11,794 
             
 
On April 18, 2011, the Railroad Commission of Texas (RRC) issued an order in the rate case of Atmos Pipeline — Texas (APT) that was originally filed in September 2010. The RRC approved an annual operating


51


Table of Contents

income increase of $20.4 million as well as the following major provisions that went into effect with bills rendered on and after May 1, 2011:
 
  • Authorized return on equity of 11.8 percent.
 
  • A capital structure of 49.5 percent debt/50.5 percent equity
 
  • Approval of a rate base of $807.7 million, compared to the $417.1 million rate base from the prior rate case.
 
  • An annual adjustment mechanism, which was approved for a three-year pilot program, that will adjust regulated rates up or down by 75 percent of the difference between APT’s non-regulated annual revenue and a pre-defined base credit.
 
  • Approval of a straight fixed variable rate design, under which all fixed costs associated with transportation and storage services are recovered through monthly customer charges.
 
The $8.6 million increase in regulated transmission and storage gross profit was attributable primarily to a net $8.7 million increase as a result of this rate case.
 
Operating expenses increased $5.1 million primarily due to the following:
 
  • $3.2 million due to higher levels of pipeline maintenance activities.
 
  • $1.6 million due to higher depreciation expense.
 
At June 30, 2011, a GRIP filing was in progress with the RRC in which $12.6 million of additional annual operating income was requested. On July 26, 2011, the RRC approved the GRIP filing.
 
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2011 compared with Nine Months Ended June 30, 2010
 
Financial and operational highlights for our regulated transmission and storage segment for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are presented below.
 
             
  Nine Months Ended
 
  June 30 
  2011  2010  Change 
  (In thousands, unless otherwise noted) 
 
Mid-Tex transportation
 $92,729  $81,833  $10,896 
Third-party transportation
  49,841   49,098   743 
Storage and park and lend services
  6,191   7,924   (1,733)
Other
  8,792   8,143   649 
             
Gross profit
  157,553   146,998   10,555 
Operating expenses
  79,373   78,498   875 
             
Operating income
  78,180   68,500   9,680 
Miscellaneous income
  5,267   117   5,150 
Interest charges
  23,802   23,589   213 
             
Income before income taxes
  59,645   45,028   14,617 
Income tax expense
  21,252   16,039   5,213 
             
Net income
 $38,393  $28,989  $9,404 
             
Gross pipeline transportation volumes — MMcf
  468,943   478,075   (9,132)
             
Consolidated pipeline transportation volumes — MMcf
  305,898   295,126   10,772 
             


52


Table of Contents

The $10.6 million increase in regulated transmission and storage gross profit was attributable primarily due to the following:
 
  • $8.7 million net increase as a result of the rate case that was finalized and became effective in May 2011.
 
  • $6.2 million increase associated with our GRIP filings.
 
These increases were partially offset by the following:
 
  • $2.8 million decrease due to a decline in throughput to our Mid-Tex Division.
 
  • $2.4 million decrease due to decreased transportation fees.
 
Operating expenses increased $0.9 million primarily due to the following:
 
  • $3.0 million increase due to higher depreciation expense.
 
  • $1.8 million increase due to higher ad valorem taxes.
 
These increases were partially offset by a $1.3 million decrease related to lower levels of pipeline maintenance activities.
 
Miscellaneous income includes a $6.0 million gain recognized in March 2011 as a result of unwinding two Treasury locks.
 
Nonregulated Segment
 
Our nonregulated activities are conducted through Atmos Energy Holdings, Inc. (AEH), which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Atmos Energy Corporation and operates primarily in the Midwest and Southeast areas of the United States.
 
AEH’s primary business is to deliver gas and provide related services by aggregating and purchasing gas supply, arranging transportation and storage logistics and ultimately delivering gas to customers at competitive prices. In addition, AEH utilizes proprietary and customer-owned transportation and storage assets to provide various delivered gas services our customers request, including furnishing natural gas supplies at fixed and market-based prices, contract negotiation and administration, load forecasting, gas storage acquisition and management services, transportation services, peaking sales and balancing services, capacity utilization strategies and gas price hedging through the use of financial instruments. As a result, AEH’s gas delivery and related services margins arise from the types of commercial transactions we have structured with our customers and our ability to identify the lowest cost alternative among the natural gas supplies, transportation and markets to which it has access to serve those customers.
 
AEH’s storage and transportation margins arise from (i) utilizing its proprietary21-milepipeline located in New Orleans, Louisiana to aggregate gas supply for our regulated natural gas distribution division in Louisiana, its gas delivery activities and, on a more limited basis, for third parties and (ii) managing proprietary storage in Kentucky and Louisiana to supplement the natural gas needs of our natural gas distribution divisions during peak periods.
 
AEH also seeks to enhance its gross profit margin by maximizing, through asset optimization activities, the economic value associated with the storage and transportation capacity it owns or controls in our natural gas distribution and by its subsidiaries. We attempt to meet these objectives by engaging in natural gas storage transactions in which we seek to find and profit through the arbitrage of pricing differences in various locations and by recognizing pricing differences that occur over time. This process involves purchasing physical natural gas, storing it in the storage and transportation assets to which AEH has access and selling financial instruments at advantageous prices to lock in a gross profit margin.
 
AEH continually manages its net physical position to attempt to increase the future economic profit that was created when the original transaction was executed. Therefore, AEH may subsequently change its originally scheduled storage injection and withdrawal plans from one time period to another based on market


53


Table of Contents

conditions. If AEH elects to accelerate the withdrawal of physical gas, it will execute new financial instruments to offset the original financial instruments. If AEH elects to defer the withdrawal of gas, it will execute new financial instruments to correspond to the revised withdrawal schedule and allow the original financial instrument to settle as contracted.
 
We use financial instruments, designated as fair value hedges, to hedge our natural gas inventory used in our natural gas marketing storage activities. These financial instruments are marked to market each month based upon the NYMEX price with changes in fair value recognized as unrealized gains and losses in the period of change. The hedged natural gas inventory is marked to market at the end of each month based on the Gas Daily index with changes in fair value recognized as unrealized gains and losses in the period of change. Changes in the spreads between the forward natural gas prices used to value the financial hedges designated against our physical inventory and the market (spot) prices used to value our physical storage result in unrealized margins until the underlying physical gas is withdrawn and the related financial instruments are settled. Once the gas is withdrawn and the financial instruments are settled, the previously unrealized margins associated with these net positions are realized.
 
AEH also uses financial instruments to capture additional storage arbitrage opportunities that may arise after the original physical inventory hedge and to attempt to insulate and protect the economic value within its asset optimization activities. Changes in fair value associated with these financial instruments are recognized as a component of unrealized margins until they are settled.
 
Due to the nature of these operations, natural gas prices and differences in natural gas prices between the various markets that we serve (commonly referred to as basis differentials), have a significant impact on our nonregulated businesses. Within our delivered gas activities, basis differentials impact our ability to create value from identifying the lowest cost alternative among the natural gas supplies, transportation and markets to which we have access. Further, higher natural gas prices may adversely impact our accounts receivable collections, resulting in higher bad debt expense, and may require us to increase borrowings under our credit facilities resulting in higher interest expense. Higher gas prices, as well as competitive factors in the industry and general economic conditions may also cause customers to conserve or use alternative energy sources. Within our asset optimization activities, higher gas prices could also lead to increased borrowings under our credit facilities resulting in higher interest expense.
 
Volatility in natural gas prices also has a significant impact on our nonregulated segment. Increased price volatility often has a significant impact on the spreads between the market (spot) prices and forward natural gas prices, which creates opportunities to earn higher arbitrage spreads within our asset optimization activities. Volatility could also impact the basis differentials we capture in our delivered gas activities. However, increased volatility impacts the amounts of unrealized margins recorded in our gross profit and could impact the amount of cash required to collateralize our risk management liabilities.
 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 compared with Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
 
Financial and operational highlights for our nonregulated segment for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are presented below. Gross profit margin consists primarily of margins earned from the delivery of gas and related services requested by our customers, margins earned from storage and transportation services and margins earned from asset optimization activities, which are derived from the utilization of our proprietary and managed third-party storage and transportation assets to capture favorable arbitrage spreads through natural gas trading activities.
 
Unrealized margins represent the unrealized gains or losses on our net physical gas position and the related financial instruments used to manage commodity price risk as described above. These margins fluctuate based upon changes in the spreads between the physical and forward natural gas prices. Generally, if the physical/financial spread narrows, we will record unrealized gains or lower unrealized losses. If the physical/financial spread widens, we will record unrealized losses or lower unrealized gains. The magnitude of the


54


Table of Contents

unrealized gains and losses is also contingent upon the levels of our net physical position at the end of the reporting period.
 
             
  Three Months Ended
 
  June 30 
  2011  2010  Change 
  (In thousands, unless otherwise noted) 
 
Realized margins
            
Gas delivery and related services
 $11,631  $12,550  $(919)
Storage and transportation services
  4,042   3,319   723 
Other
  1,177   1,345   (168)
             
   16,850   17,214   (364)
Asset optimization(1)
  (3,623)  9,303   (12,926)
             
Total realized margins
  13,227   26,517   (13,290)
Unrealized margins
  178   (14,746)  14,924 
             
Gross profit
  13,405   11,771   1,634 
Operating expenses, excluding asset impairment
  9,359   10,667   (1,308)
Asset impairment
  10,988      10,988 
             
Operating income (loss)
  (6,942)  1,104   (8,046)
Miscellaneous income
  168   511   (343)
Interest charges
  283   1,912   (1,629)
             
Loss before income taxes
  (7,057)  (297)  (6,760)
Income tax expense (benefit)
  (3,160)  420   (3,580)
             
Net loss
 $(3,897) $(717) $(3,180)
             
Gross nonregulated delivered gas sales volumes — MMcf
  104,658   91,854   12,804 
             
Consolidated nonregulated delivered gas sales volumes — MMcf
  88,382   75,014   13,368 
             
Net physical position (Bcf)
  16.7   20.1   (3.4)
             
 
 
(1)Net of storage fees of $3.8 million and $3.3 million.
 
Realized margins for gas delivery, storage and transportation services and other services were $16.9 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with $17.2 million for the prior-year quarter. The decrease primarily reflects a decrease of $0.03/Mcf for consolidated delivered gas margins in the current quarter, partially offset by an 18 percent increase in consolidated delivered gas volumes due to new customers in the power generation market.
 
The $12.9 million decrease in realized asset optimization margins from the prior-year quarter reflects the impact of continued weak natural gas market fundamentals, which have reduced price volatility and compressed spot to forward spread values resulting in less favorable trading opportunities. As a result, during the current quarter, AEH captured smaller spread values from its asset optimization activities. This contrasts to the prior-year quarter, when AEH recognized higher spread values that it had captured from rolling positions.
 
Weak market fundamentals have also reduced the demand and fees paid for storage. During the quarter, AEH started to capitalize on falling storage demand fees by replacing expiring storage contracts with new contracts with lower storage demand fees and allowing non-strategic contracts to expire without renewing them. This should improve AEH’s ability to realize gains from its asset optimization activities in future periods.


55


Table of Contents

The decrease in realized asset optimization margins was offset by a $14.9 million increase in unrealized margins that reflects thequarter-over-quartertiming of realized margins coupled with lower natural gas price volatility.
 
Operating expenses decreased $1.3 million primarily due to lower employee costs.
 
Asset impairment reflects the $11.0 million pre-tax impairment of certain natural gas gathering assets recorded in the current quarter.
 
Interest charges decreased $1.6 million primarily due to a decrease in intercompany borrowings.
 
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2011 compared with Nine Months Ended June 30, 2010
 
Financial and operational highlights for our natural gas marketing segment for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are presented below.
 
             
  Nine Months Ended
 
  June 30 
  2011  2010  Change 
  (In thousands, unless otherwise noted) 
 
Realized margins
            
Gas delivery and related services
 $46,842  $45,763  $1,079 
Storage and transportation services
  10,913   9,746   1,167 
Other
  3,956   3,907   49 
             
   61,711   59,416   2,295 
Asset optimization(1)
  (344)  46,694   (47,038)
             
Total realized margins
  61,367   106,110   (44,743)
Unrealized margins
  (2,726)  (10,403)  7,677 
             
Gross profit
  58,641   95,707   (37,066)
Operating expenses, excluding asset impairment
  30,200   35,552   (5,352)
Asset impairment
  30,270      30,270 
             
Operating income (loss)
  (1,829)  60,155   (61,984)
Miscellaneous income
  764   1,524   (760)
Interest charges
  1,759   8,035   (6,276)
             
Income (loss) before income taxes
  (2,824)  53,644   (56,468)
Income tax expense (benefit)
  (1,364)  21,608   (22,972)
             
Net income (loss)
 $(1,460) $32,036  $(33,496)
             
Gross nonregulated delivered gas sales volumes — MMcf
  339,747   317,992   21,755 
             
Consolidated nonregulated delivered gas sales
            
volumes — MMcf
  290,486   267,136   23,350 
             
Net physical position (Bcf)
  16.7   20.1   (3.4)
             
 
 
(1)Net of storage fees of $10.7 million and $10.0 million.
 
Realized margins for gas delivery, storage and transportation services and other services were $61.7 million during the nine months ended June 30, 2011 compared with $59.4 million for the prior-year period. The increase primarily reflects a nine percent increase in consolidated delivered gas sales volumes due to new customers in the power generation market and a $1.2 million increase in margins from storage and transportation services, attributable to new drilling projects in the Barnett Shale area.


56


Table of Contents

The $47.0 million decrease in realized asset optimization margins from the prior-year period primarily reflects greater intramonth trading gains realized in the prior-year period from more favorable trading opportunities in the daily cash market, combined with lower realized gains in the current-year period due to continued weak natural gas market fundamentals.
 
Unrealized margins increased $7.7 million in the current period compared to the prior-year period primarily due to the timing ofyear-over-yearrealized margins.
 
Operating expenses decreased $5.4 million primarily due to lower employee expenses.
 
Asset impairment includes the aforementioned $11.0 million pre-tax impairment charge related to certain natural gas gathering assets. In addition, an asset impairment charge of $19.3 million was recorded in March 2011 related to our investment in Fort Necessity. As we previously discussed in our Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, in February 2008, Atmos Pipeline and Storage, LLC, a subsidiary of AEH, announced plans to construct and operate a salt-cavern storage project in Franklin Parish, Louisiana. In March 2010, we entered into an option and acquisition agreement with a third party, which provided the third party with the exclusive option to develop the proposed Fort Necessity salt-dome natural gas storage project. In July 2010, we agreed with the third party to extend the option period to March 2011. In January 2011, the third party developer notified us that it did not plan to commence the activities required to allow it to exercise the option by March 2011; accordingly, the option was terminated. We evaluated our strategic alternatives and concluded the project’s returns did not meet our investment objectives. As such, we recorded a pretax noncash impairment to write off substantially all of our investment in the project during the second quarter of fiscal 2011.
 
Interest charges decreased $6.3 million primarily due to a decrease in intercompany borrowings.
 
Asset Optimization Activities
 
AEH monitors the impact of its asset optimization efforts by estimating the gross profit, before related fees, that it captured through the purchase and sale of physical natural gas and the execution of the associated financial instruments. This economic value, combined with the effect of the future reversal of unrealized gains or losses currently recognized in the income statement and related fees is referred to as the potential gross profit.
 
We define potential gross profit as the change in AEH’s gross profit in future periods if its optimization efforts are executed as planned. This amount does not include other operating expenses and associated income taxes that will be incurred to realize this amount. Therefore, it does not represent an estimated increase in future net income. There is no assurance that the economic value or the potential gross profit will be fully realized in the future.
 
We consider this measure a non-GAAP financial measure as it is calculated using both forward-looking storage injection/withdrawal and hedge settlement estimates and historical financial information. This measure is presented because we believe it provides a more comprehensive view to investors of our asset optimization efforts and thus a better understanding of these activities than would be presented by GAAP measures alone. Because there is no assurance that the economic value or potential gross profit will be realized in the future, corresponding future GAAP amounts are not available.


57


Table of Contents

The following table presents AEH’s economic value and its potential gross profit (loss) at June 30, 2011 and 2010.
 
         
  June 30 
  2011  2010 
  (In millions, unless otherwise noted) 
 
Economic value
 $(7.7) $(8.5)
Associated unrealized losses
  8.3   16.5 
         
Subtotal
  0.6   8.0 
Related fees(1)
  (21.4)  (13.8)
         
Potential gross profit (loss)
 $(20.8) $(5.8)
         
Net physical position (Bcf)
  16.7   20.1 
         
 
 
(1)Related fees represent the contractual costs to acquire the storage capacity utilized in our nonregulated segment’s asset optimization activities. The fees primarily consist of demand fees and contractual obligations to sell gas below market index prices in exchange for the right to manage and optimize third party storage assets for the positions we have entered into as of June 30, 2011 and 2010.
 
During the nine months ended June 30, 2011, our nonregulated segment’s economic value decreased from ($7.5) million, or ($0.48)/Mcf at September 30, 2010 to ($7.7) million, or ($0.46)/Mcf. This compares favorably to economic value at June 30, 2010 of ($8.5) million, or ($0.42)/Mcf.
 
For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, the decrease in our economic value was primarily the result of withdrawing physical gas below our overall weighted average cost of gas while settling financial instruments with higher average prices.
 
The economic value is based upon planned storage injection and withdrawal schedules and its realization is contingent upon the execution of this plan, weather and other execution factors. Since AEH actively manages and optimizes its portfolio to attempt to enhance the future profitability of its storage position, it may change its scheduled storage injection and withdrawal plans from one time period to another based on market conditions. Therefore, we cannot ensure that the economic value or the potential gross profit calculated as of June 30, 2011 will be fully realized in the future nor can we predict in what time periods such realization may occur. Further, if we experience operational or other issues which limit our ability to optimally manage our stored gas positions, our earnings could be adversely impacted.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
The liquidity required to fund our working capital, capital expenditures and other cash needs is provided from a variety of sources including internally generated funds and borrowings under our commercial paper program and bank credit facilities. Additionally, we have various uncommitted trade credit lines with our gas suppliers that we utilize to purchase natural gas on a monthly basis. Finally, from time to time, we raise funds from the public debt and equity capital markets to fund our liquidity needs.
 
We regularly evaluate our funding strategy and profile to ensure that we have sufficient liquidity for our short-term and long-term needs in a cost-effective manner. We also evaluate the levels of committed borrowing capacity that we require. During fiscal 2011, we have been executing our strategy of consolidating our short-term facilities used for our regulated operations into a single line of credit, including the following.
 
  • On May 2, 2011, we replaced our five-year $566.7 million unsecured credit facility, due to expire in December 2011, with a five-year $750 million unsecured credit facility with an accordion feature that could increase our borrowing capacity to $1.0 billion.
 
  • In December 2010, we replaced AEM’s $450 million364-dayfacility with a $200 million, three-year facility. The reduced amount of the new facility is due to the current low cost of gas and certain


58


Table of Contents

 regulatory restrictions; however, this facility contains an accordion feature that could increase our borrowing capacity to $500 million.
 
  • In October 2010, we replaced our $200 million364-dayrevolving credit agreement with a $200 million180-dayrevolving credit agreement that expired in April 2011. As planned, we did not replace or extend this agreement.
 
As a result of these changes, we now have $975 million of availability from our commercial paper program and three committed revolving credit facilities with third parties.
 
Our $350 million 7.375% senior notes were paid on their maturity date on May 15, 2011 using funds drawn from commercial paper. We refinanced this debt on a long-term basis through the issuance of $400 million 5.50%30-yearunsecured senior notes on June 10, 2011. On September 30, 2010, we entered into three Treasury lock agreements to fix the Treasury yield component of the interest cost of financing the anticipated issuances of senior notes. The Treasury locks were settled on June 7, 2011 with the receipt of $20.1 million from the counterparties due to an increase in the30-yearTreasury lock rates between inception of the Treasury lock and settlement. The effective interest rate on these notes is 5.381 percent, after giving effect to offering costs and the settlement of the $300 million Treasury locks. The majority of the net proceeds of approximately $394 million was used to repay $350 million of outstanding commercial paper. The remainder of the net proceeds was used for general corporate purposes.
 
Additionally, we had planned to issue $250 million of30-yearunsecured notes in November 2011 to fund our capital expenditure program. In September 2010, we entered into two Treasury lock agreements to fix the Treasury yield component of the interest cost associated with the anticipated issuance of these senior notes, which were designated as cash flow hedges of an anticipated transaction. Due to stronger than anticipated cash flows primarily resulting from the extension of the Bush tax cuts that allow the continued use of bonus depreciation on qualifying expenditures through December 31, 2011, the need to issue $250 million of debt in November was eliminated and the related Treasury lock agreements were unwound. A pretax cash gain of approximately $28 million was recorded in March 2011.
 
We believe the liquidity provided by our senior notes and committed credit facilities, combined with our operating cash flows, will be sufficient to fund our working capital needs and capital expenditure program for the remainder of fiscal 2011.
 
Cash Flows
 
Our internally generated funds may change in the future due to a number of factors, some of which we cannot control. These include regulatory changes, prices for our products and services, demand for such products and services, margin requirements resulting from significant changes in commodity prices, operational risks and other factors.
 
Cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are presented below.
 
             
  Nine Months Ended June 30 
  2011  2010  Change 
  (In thousands) 
 
Total cash provided by (used in)
            
Operating activities
 $519,562  $594,564  $(75,002)
Investing activities
  (393,656)  (362,787)  (30,869)
Financing activities
  (140,429)  (162,597)  22,168 
             
Change in cash and cash equivalents
  (14,523)  69,180   (83,703)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
  131,952   111,203   20,749 
             
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
 $117,429  $180,383  $(62,954)
             


59


Table of Contents

Cash flows from operating activities
 
Period-over-periodchanges in our operating cash flows are primarily attributable to changes in net income and working capital changes, particularly within our natural gas distribution segment resulting from the price of natural gas and the timing of customer collections, payments for natural gas purchases and deferred gas cost recoveries.
 
For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, we generated operating cash flow of $519.6 million from operating activities compared with $594.6 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2010. The $75.0 million decrease in operating cash flows primarily reflects the timing of gas cost recoveries under our purchased gas cost mechanisms and other net working capital changes.
 
Cash flows from investing activities
 
In recent years, a substantial portion of our cash resources has been used to fund growth projects, our ongoing construction program and improvements to information technology systems. Our ongoing construction program enables us to provide natural gas distribution services to our existing customer base, expand our natural gas distribution services into new markets, enhance the integrity of our pipelines and, more recently, expand our intrastate pipeline network. In executing our current rate strategy, we are directing discretionary capital spending to jurisdictions that permit us to earn a timely return on our investment. Currently, rate designs in our Mid-Tex, Louisiana, Mississippi and West Texas natural gas distribution divisions and our Atmos Pipeline — Texas Division provide the opportunity to include in their rate base approved capital costs on a periodic basis without being required to file a rate case.
 
Capital expenditures for fiscal 2011 are expected to range from $610 million to $625 million. For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, capital expenditures were $390.3 million compared with $362.3 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2010. The $28.0 million increase in capital expenditures primarily reflects spending for the steel service line replacement program in the Mid-Tex Division and the development of a new customer service system in the current year, partially offset by the costs incurred in the prior fiscal year to relocate the company’s information technology data center.
 
Cash flows from financing activities
 
For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, our financing activities used $140.4 million of cash compared with $162.6 million of cash used in the prior-year period, primarily due to higher proceeds from debt issuances in the current year, including the following:
 
  • $394.6 million net cash proceeds received in June 2011 related to the issuance of $400 million 5.50% senior notes due 2041.
 
  • $20.1 million cash received in June 2011 related to the settlement of three Treasury locks associated with the $400 million 5.50% senior notes offering.
 
  • $27.8 million cash received in March 2011 related to the unwinding of two Treasury locks.
 
These higher proceeds were partially offset by higher repayment activity, including the following:
 
  • $360.1 million for scheduled long-term debt repayments. In the current-year period, $360.1 million of long-term debt was repaid, including our $350 million 7.375% senior notes that were paid on their maturity date on May 15, 2011. In the prior-year period, $0.1 million of long-term debt was repaid.
 
  • $56.1 million for short-term debt repayments. In the current-year period, $132.1 million of short-term debt was repaid, compared with $76.0 million in the prior-year period.
 
  • $4.1 million for the repurchase of equity awards. In the current-year period, we repurchased $5.3 million equity awards, compared with $1.2 million in the prior-year period.


60


Table of Contents

 
The following table summarizes our share issuances for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
 
         
  Nine Months Ended
 
  June 30 
  2011  2010 
 
Shares issued:
        
Direct Stock Purchase Plan
     103,529 
Retirement Savings Plan and Trust
     79,722 
1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan
  663,555   375,039 
Outside DirectorsStock-for-FeePlan
  1,801   2,689 
         
Total shares issued
  665,356   560,979 
         
 
Theyear-over-yearchange in the number of shares issued primarily reflects an increased number of shares issued under our 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan due to the exercise of stock options during the current year. This increase was partially offset by the fact that we are purchasing shares in the open market rather than issuing new shares for the Direct Stock Purchase Plan and the Retirement Savings Plan. During the nine months ended June 30, 2011, we cancelled and retired 169,269 shares attributable to federal withholdings on equity awards and repurchased and retired 375,468 shares attributable to our accelerated share repurchase agreement, which are not included in the table above.
 
Share Repurchase Agreement
 
On, July 1, 2010, we entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement with Goldman Sachs & Co. under which we repurchased $100 million of our outstanding common stock in order to offset stock grants made under our various employee and director incentive compensation plans.
 
We paid $100 million to Goldman Sachs & Co. on July 7, 2010 for shares of Atmos Energy common stock in a share forward transaction and received 2,958,580 shares. On March 4, 2011, we received and retired an additional 375,468 common shares, which concluded our share repurchase agreement. In total, we received and retired 3,334,048 common shares under the repurchase agreement. The final number of shares we ultimately repurchased in the transaction was based generally on the average of the daily volume-weighted average share price of our common stock over the duration of the agreement. As a result of this transaction, beginning in our fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, the number of outstanding shares used to calculate our earnings per share was reduced by the number of shares received and the $100 million purchase price was recorded as a reduction in shareholders’ equity.
 
Credit Facilities
 
Our short-term borrowing requirements are affected by the seasonal nature of the natural gas business. Changes in the price of natural gas and the amount of natural gas we need to supply to meet our customers’ needs could significantly affect our borrowing requirements. However, our short-term borrowings reach their highest levels in the winter months.
 
We finance our short-term borrowing requirements through a combination of a $750.0 million commercial paper program and three committed revolving credit facilities with third-party lenders that provided approximately $1.0 billion of working capital funding. As of June 30, 2011, the amount available to us under our credit facilities, net of outstanding letters of credit, was $900.2 million. These facilities are described in further detail in Note 6 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
Shelf Registration
 
We have an effective shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that permits us to issue a total of $1.3 billion in common stockand/or debt securities. The shelf registration statement has been approved by all requisite state regulatory commissions. Due to certain restrictions imposed by one state regulatory commission on our ability to issue securities under the new registration statement, we


61


Table of Contents

were able to issue a total of $950 million in debt securities and $350 million in equity securities. At June 30, 2011, $900 million was available for issuance. Of this amount, $550 million is available for the issuance of debt securities and $350 million remains available for the issuance of equity securities under the shelf until March 2013.
 
Credit Ratings
 
Our credit ratings directly affect our ability to obtain short-term and long-term financing, in addition to the cost of such financing. In determining our credit ratings, the rating agencies consider a number of quantitative factors, including debt to total capitalization, operating cash flow relative to outstanding debt, operating cash flow coverage of interest and pension liabilities and funding status. In addition, the rating agencies consider qualitative factors such as consistency of our earnings over time, the quality of our management and business strategy, the risks associated with our regulated and nonregulated businesses and the regulatory structures that govern our rates in the states where we operate.
 
Our debt is rated by three rating agencies: Standard & Poor’s Corporation (S&P), Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s) and Fitch Ratings, Ltd. (Fitch). On May 11, 2011, Moody’s upgraded our senior unsecured debt rating to Baa1 from Baa2, with a ratings outlook of stable, citing steady rate increases, improving credit metrics and a strategic focus on lower risk regulated activities as reasons for the upgrade. On June 2, 2011, Fitch upgraded our senior unsecured debt rating to A- from BBB+, with a ratings outlook of stable, citing a constructive regulatory environment, strategic focus on lower risk regulated activities and the geographic diversity of our regulated operations as key rating factors. As of June 30, 2011, S&P maintained a stable outlook. Our current debt ratings are all considered investment grade and are as follows:
 
             
  S&P Moody’s Fitch
 
Unsecured senior long-term debt
  BBB+   Baa1   A- 
Commercial paper
  A-2   P-2   F-2 
 
A significant degradation in our operating performance or a significant reduction in our liquidity caused by more limited access to the private and public credit markets as a result of deteriorating global or national financial and credit conditions could trigger a negative change in our ratings outlook or even a reduction in our credit ratings by the three credit rating agencies. This would mean more limited access to the private and public credit markets and an increase in the costs of such borrowings.
 
A credit rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities. The highest investment grade credit rating is AAA for S&P, Aaa for Moody’s and AAA for Fitch. The lowest investment grade credit rating is BBB-for S&P, Baa3 for Moody’s and BBB- for Fitch. Our credit ratings may be revised or withdrawn at any time by the rating agencies, and each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. There can be no assurance that a rating will remain in effect for any given period of time or that a rating will not be lowered, or withdrawn entirely, by a rating agency if, in its judgment, circumstances so warrant.
 
Debt Covenants
 
We were in compliance with all of our debt covenants as of June 30, 2011. Our debt covenants are described in greater detail in Note 6 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.


62


Table of Contents

Capitalization
 
The following table presents our capitalization inclusive of short-term debt and the current portion of long-term debt as of June 30, 2011, September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010:
 
                         
  June 30, 2011  September 30, 2010  June 30, 2010 
  (In thousands, except percentages) 
 
Short-term debt
 $     $126,100   2.8% $    
Long-term debt
  2,208,540   48.6%  2,169,682   48.5%  2,169,677   48.4%
Shareholders’ equity
  2,335,824   51.4%  2,178,348   48.7%  2,313,730   51.6%
                         
Total
 $4,544,364   100.0% $4,474,130   100.0% $4,483,407   100.0%
                         
 
Total debt as a percentage of total capitalization, including short-term debt, was 48.6 percent at June 30, 2011, 51.3 percent at September 30, 2010 and 48.4 percent at June 30, 2010. Our ratio of total debt to capitalization is typically greater during the winter heating season as we incur short-term debt to fund natural gas purchases and meet our working capital requirements. We intend to maintain our debt to capitalization ratio in a target range of 50 to 55 percent.
 
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
 
Significant commercial commitments are described in Note 9 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. There were no significant changes in our contractual obligations and commercial commitments during the nine months ended June 30, 2011.
 
Risk Management Activities
 
We conduct risk management activities through our natural gas distribution and nonregulated segments. In our natural gas distribution segment, we use a combination of physical storage, fixed physical contracts and fixed financial contracts to reduce our exposure to unusually large winter-period gas price increases.
 
In our nonregulated segment, we manage our exposure to the risk of natural gas price changes and lock in our gross profit margin through a combination of storage and financial instruments, including futures,over-the-counterand exchange-traded options and swap contracts with counterparties. To the extent our inventory cost and actual sales and actual purchases do not correlate with the changes in the market indices we use in our hedges, we could experience ineffectiveness or the hedges may no longer meet the accounting requirements for hedge accounting, resulting in the financial instruments being treated as mark to market instruments through earnings.
 
The following table shows the components of the change in fair value of our natural gas distribution segment’s financial instruments for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
 
                 
  Three Months Ended
  Nine Months Ended
 
  June 30  June 30 
  2011  2010  2011  2010 
  (In thousands) 
 
Fair value of contracts at beginning of period
 $30,533  $(21,735) $(49,600) $(14,166)
Contracts realized/settled
  (13)  (20)  (51,058)  (34,438)
Fair value of new contracts
  1,801   182   2,872   (2,054)
Other changes in value
  (34,845)  1,183   95,262   30,268 
                 
Fair value of contracts at end of period
 $(2,524) $(20,390) $(2,524) $(20,390)
                 


63


Table of Contents

The fair value of our natural gas distribution segment’s financial instruments at June 30, 2011 is presented below by time period and fair value source:
 
                     
  Fair Value of Contracts at June 30, 2011 
  Maturity in Years    
  Less
        Greater
  Total Fair
 
Source of Fair Value
 Than 1  1-3  4-5  Than 5  Value 
  (In thousands) 
 
Prices actively quoted
 $(3,235) $711  $  $  $(2,524)
Prices based on models and other valuation methods
               
                     
Total Fair Value
 $(3,235) $711  $  $  $(2,524)
                     
 
The following table shows the components of the change in fair value of our nonregulated segment’s financial instruments for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
 
                 
  Three Months Ended
  Nine Months Ended
 
  June 30  June 30 
  2011  2010  2011  2010 
  (In thousands) 
 
Fair value of contracts at beginning of period
 $(12,942) $14,227  $(12,374) $26,698 
Contracts realized/settled
  3,357   (8,100)  3,282   (32,342)
Fair value of new contracts
            
Other changes in value
  (1,824)  (8,337)  (2,317)  3,434 
                 
Fair value of contracts at end of period
  (11,409)  (2,210)  (11,409)  (2,210)
Netting of cash collateral
  15,382   18,017   15,382   18,017 
                 
Cash collateral and fair value of contracts at period end
 $3,973  $15,807  $3,973  $15,807 
                 
 
The fair value of our nonregulated segment’s financial instruments at June 30, 2011 is presented below by time period and fair value source:
 
                     
  Fair Value of Contracts at June 30, 2011 
  Maturity in Years    
  Less
        Greater
  Total Fair
 
Source of Fair Value
 Than 1  1-3  4-5  Than 5  Value 
  (In thousands) 
 
Prices actively quoted
 $(5,336) $(6,097) $24  $  $(11,409)
Prices based on models and other valuation methods
               
                     
Total Fair Value
 $(5,336) $(6,097) $24  $  $(11,409)
                     
 
Pension and Postretirement Benefits Obligations
 
For the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, our total net periodic pension and other benefits costs were $42.7 million and $38.1 million. Those costs relating to our natural gas distribution operations are recoverable through our gas distribution rates; however, a portion of these costs is capitalized into our distribution rate base. The remaining costs are recorded as a component of operation and maintenance expense.
 
Our fiscal 2011 costs were determined using a September 30, 2010 measurement date. As of September 30, 2010, interest and corporate bond rates utilized to determine our discount rates, were significantly higher than the interest and corporate bond rates as of September 30, 2009, the measurement date for our fiscal 2010 net periodic cost. Accordingly, we decreased our discount rate used to determine our fiscal 2011 pension and benefit costs to 5.39 percent. We maintained the expected return on our pension plan assets


64


Table of Contents

at 8.25 percent, despite the recent decline in the financial markets as we believe this rate reflects the average rate of expected earnings on plan assets that will fund our projected benefit obligation. Accordingly, our fiscal 2011 pension and postretirement medical costs for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 were significantly higher than the prior-year period.
 
In August 2010, the Board of Directors of Atmos Energy approved a proposal to close the Pension Account Plan (PAP) to new participants, effective October 1, 2010. Employees participating in the PAP as of October 1, 2010 were allowed to make a one-time election to migrate from the PAP into our defined contribution plan with enhanced features, effective January 1, 2011. Participants who chose to remain in the PAP will continue to earn benefits and interest allocations with no changes to their existing benefits. During the election period, a limited number of participants chose to join the new plan, which resulted in an immaterial curtailment gain and a revaluation of the net periodic pension cost for the remainder of fiscal 2011. An immaterial curtailment gain was recorded in our second fiscal quarter. The revaluation of the net periodic pension cost resulted in an increase in the discount rate, effective January 1, 2011 to 5.68 percent, which will reduce our net periodic pension cost by approximately $1.8 million for the remainder of the fiscal year. All other actuarial assumptions remained the same.
 
In accordance with the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA), we determined the funded status of our plans as of January 1, 2011. Based upon this valuation, we expect we will be required to contribute less than $2 million to our pension plans by September 15, 2011. The need for this funding reflects the decline in the fair value of the plans’ assets resulting from the unfavorable market conditions experienced during 2008 and 2009. This contribution will increase the level of our plan assets to achieve a desirable PPA funding threshold. With respect to our postretirement medical plans, we anticipate contributing a total of approximately $12 million to these plans during fiscal 2011.
 
The projected pension liability, future funding requirements and the amount of pension expense or income recognized for the plan are subject to change, depending upon the actuarial value of plan assets and the determination of future benefit obligations as of each subsequent actuarial calculation date. These amounts will be determined by actual investment returns, changes in interest rates, values of assets in the plan and changes in the demographic composition of the participants in the plan.


65


Table of Contents

OPERATING STATISTICS AND OTHER INFORMATION
 
The following tables present certain operating statistics for our natural gas distribution, regulated transmission and storage and nonregulated segments for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
 
Natural Gas Distribution Sales and Statistical Data — Continuing Operations
 
                 
  Three Months Ended
  Nine Months Ended
 
  June 30  June 30 
  2011  2010  2011  2010 
 
METERS IN SERVICE, end of period
                
Residential
  2,845,554   2,841,716   2,845,554   2,841,716 
Commercial
  258,448   262,349   258,448   262,349 
Industrial
  2,319   2,359   2,319   2,359 
Public authority and other
  10,206   10,117   10,206   10,117 
                 
Total meters
  3,116,527   3,116,541   3,116,527   3,116,541 
                 
INVENTORY STORAGE BALANCE — Bcf
  36.3   32.8   36.3   32.8 
SALES VOLUMES — MMcf(1)
                
Gas sales volumes
                
Residential
  17,077   17,060   150,154   173,787 
Commercial
  14,149   13,690   79,632   88,260 
Industrial
  3,922   3,490   15,115   15,236 
Public authority and other
  1,863   1,373   8,764   8,713 
                 
Total gas sales volumes
  37,011   35,613   253,665   285,996 
Transportation volumes
  31,036   28,678   102,824   101,449 
                 
Total throughput
  68,047   64,291   356,489   387,445 
                 
OPERATING REVENUES (000’s)(1)
                
Gas sales revenues
                
Residential
 $232,725  $230,333  $1,379,223  $1,602,510 
Commercial
  118,916   116,933   593,860   685,996 
Industrial
  22,525   19,108   85,641   90,468 
Public authority and other
  12,013   9,125   58,096   61,595 
                 
Total gas sales revenues
  386,179   375,499   2,116,820   2,440,569 
Transportation revenues
  13,946   13,303   47,364   46,276 
Other gas revenues
  6,906   7,517   23,723   25,187 
                 
Total operating revenues
 $407,031  $396,319  $2,187,907  $2,512,032 
                 
Average transportation revenue per Mcf
 $0.45  $0.46  $0.46  $0.46 
Average cost of gas per Mcf sold
 $5.59  $5.76  $5.19  $5.80 
 
See footnote following these tables.


66


Table of Contents

Natural Gas Distribution Sales and Statistical Data — Discontinued Operations
 
                 
  Three Months Ended
  Nine Months Ended
 
  June 30  June 30 
  2011  2010  2011  2010 
 
Meters in service, end of period
  83,109   83,094   83,109   83,094 
Inventory storage balance — Bcf
  2.0   1.9   2.0   1.9 
Sales volumes — MMcf
                
Total gas sales volumes
  936   726   7,910   8,187 
Transportation volumes
  1,192   1,633   4,813   5,648 
                 
Total throughput
  2,128   2,359   12,723   13,835 
                 
Operating revenues (000’s)
 $11,524  $8,952  $71,047  $62,121 
 
Regulated Transmission and Storage and Nonregulated Operations Sales and Statistical Data
 
                 
  Three Months Ended
  Nine Months Ended
 
  June 30  June 30 
  2011  2010  2011  2010 
 
CUSTOMERS, end of period
                
Industrial
  764   732   764   732 
Municipal
  61   61   61   61 
Other
  511   507   511   507 
                 
Total
  1,336   1,300   1,336   1,300 
                 
NONREGULATED INVENTORY STORAGE
                
BALANCE — Bcf
  21.4   21.9   21.4   21.9 
REGULATED TRANSMISSION AND
                
STORAGE VOLUMES — MMcf(1)
  141,294   127,861   468,943   478,075 
NONREGULATED DELIVERED GAS SALES
                
VOLUMES — MMcf(1)
  104,658   91,854   339,747   317,992 
OPERATING REVENUES (000’s)(1)
                
Regulated transmission and storage
 $53,570  $44,957  $157,553  $146,998 
Nonregulated
  491,285   427,405   1,550,456   1,652,453 
                 
Total operating revenues
 $544,855  $472,362  $1,708,009  $1,799,451 
                 
 
Note to preceding tables:
 
 
(1)Sales volumes and revenues reflect segment operations, including intercompany sales and transportation amounts.
 
RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS
 
Recent accounting developments and their impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows are described in Note 2 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 
Information regarding our quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk are disclosed in Item 7A in our Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. During the nine months ended June 30, 2011, there were no material changes in our quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk.


67


Table of Contents

 
Item 4.  Controls and Procedures
 
Management’s Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined inRules 13a-15(e)and15d-15(e)under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2011 to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us, including our consolidated entities, in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms, including a reasonable level of assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
 
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
We did not make any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined inRules 13a-15(f)and15d-15(f)under the Exchange Act) during the third quarter of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1.  Legal Proceedings
 
During the nine months ended June 30, 2011, except as noted in Note 9 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, there were no material changes in the status of the litigation and other matters that were disclosed in Note 12 to our Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. We continue to believe that the final outcome of such litigation and other matters or claims will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
 
Item 6.  Exhibits
 
A list of exhibits required by Item 601 ofRegulation S-Kand filed as part of this report is set forth in the Exhibits Index, which immediately precedes such exhibits.


68


Table of Contents

 
SIGNATURE
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
Atmos Energy Corporation
       (Registrant)
 
  By: 
/s/  Fred E. Meisenheimer
Fred E. Meisenheimer
Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
(Duly authorized signatory)
 
Date: August 4, 2011


69


Table of Contents

 
EXHIBITS INDEX
Item 6
 
       
    Page Number or
Exhibit
   Incorporation by
Number
 
Description
 
Reference to
 
 12  Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges  
 15  Letter regarding unaudited interim financial information  
 31  Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)Certifications  
 32  Section 1350 Certifications*  
 101.INS XBRL Instance Document**  
 101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema**  
 101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase**  
 101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase**  
 101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase**  
 101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase**  
 
 
* These certifications, which were made pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, furnished as Exhibit 32 to this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q,will not be deemed to be filed with the Commission or incorporated by reference into any filing by the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates such certifications by reference.
 
** Pursuant to Rule 406T ofRegulation S-T,the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.


70