Beasley Broadcast Group - 10-K annual report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025

or

For the transition period from to _______________________

Commission File Number: 000-29253

BEASLEY BROADCAST GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

3033 Riviera Drive, Suite 200

Naples, Florida 34103

(Address of principal executive offices and Zip Code)

(239) 263-5000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  No 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes  No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes  No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. 

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. 

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to § 240.10D-1(b). 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes  No 

As of June 30, 2025, the aggregate market value of the Class A Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $2,806,865 based on the number of shares outstanding as of such date and the closing price of $4.15 on NASDAQ’s National Market System on such date, the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

Class A Common Stock, $.001 par value, 973,170 Shares Outstanding as of April 1, 2026

Class B Common Stock, $.001 par value, 833,137 Shares Outstanding as of April 1, 2026

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Certain information in the registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A for its 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, is incorporated by reference in Part III of this report.

BEASLEY BROADCAST GROUP, INC.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2025

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

Unless the context requires otherwise, all references in this report to the “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” and similar terms refer to Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Overview

We are a multi-platform media company whose primary business is operating radio stations throughout the United States. We offer local and national advertisers integrated marketing solutions across audio, digital and event platforms. We own and operate stations in the following markets: Augusta, GA, Boston, MA, Charlotte, NC, Detroit, MI, Fayetteville, NC, Fort Myers-Naples, FL, Las Vegas, NV, Middlesex, NJ, Monmouth, NJ, Morristown, NJ, Philadelphia, PA, and Tampa-Saint Petersburg, FL. We refer to each group of stations in each market as a market cluster. Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, was formed in 1999. Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this report to “the Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” are to Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Strategy

We seek to secure and maintain a leadership position in the markets we serve by developing high quality local content, through our audio and digital platforms, including events and experiences in the communities we serve and, in turn, offer advertisers access to a highly effective marketing platform to reach large and targeted local audiences. We operate our stations in clusters to capture a variety of demographic listener groups, which we believe enhances our stations’ appeal to a wide range of advertisers. Current rules and regulations of the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) do not permit us to add more AM or FM stations to our Philadelphia, PA market cluster, or more FM stations to our Augusta, GA, Boston, MA, Charlotte, NC, Fayetteville, NC, and Las Vegas, NV market clusters.

The primary source of revenue for our stations is the sale of advertising time to local, regional and national advertisers and national network advertisers who purchase commercials in varying lengths. A growing source of revenue is from station-related digital product suites, which allow for enhanced audience interaction and participation, and integrated digital advertising solutions. A station’s local sales staff generates the majority of its local and regional advertising sales through direct solicitations of local advertising agencies and businesses. We retain a national representation firm to sell to advertisers outside of our local markets.

Competition

The radio broadcasting industry is highly competitive. Our stations compete for listeners and advertising revenue with other stations within their respective markets. In addition, our stations compete for audiences and advertising revenues with other media, including digital audio streaming, satellite radio, broadcast television, digital, satellite and cable television, video streaming services, newspapers and magazines, outdoor advertising, direct mail, wireless media alternatives, cellular phones and other forms of audio entertainment and advertisement. Competition for advertising revenues also comes directly from competitors such as Amazon, Apple, Meta and Alphabet.

The following are some of the factors that we believe are important to a station’s competitive position: (i) audience ratings; (ii) program content; (iii) management experience; (iv) sales experience; (v) audience characteristics; and (vi) the number and characteristics of other stations and other advertising media in the market area. We attempt to improve our competitive position with promotional campaigns aimed at the demographic groups targeted by our stations and by sales efforts designed to attract advertisers. We conduct extensive market research in an effort to enhance our audience ratings and, in certain circumstances, to identify opportunities to reformat stations to reach underserved demographic groups and increase advertising revenue.

Federal Regulation of Radio Broadcasting

The radio broadcasting industry is subject to extensive and changing federal regulations administered by the FCC. Among other things, the FCC:

The FCC has the power to impose penalties for violations of its rules that are implemented pursuant to the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the “Communications Act”), including the imposition of monetary forfeitures, the issuance of short-term licenses, the imposition of conditions on the renewal of a license, and, in egregious cases, non-renewal of licenses and the revocation of licenses.

The following is a brief summary of some provisions of the Communications Act and of certain specific FCC rules and policies. The summary is not a comprehensive listing of all of the regulations and policies affecting radio stations. For further information concerning the nature and extent of federal regulation of radio stations, you should refer to the Communications Act, FCC rules and FCC public notices, reports, orders and rulings.

FCC Licenses. Radio stations operate pursuant to licenses that are ordinarily granted by the FCC for renewable terms of eight years. A radio station may continue to operate beyond the expiration date of its license if a timely filed license renewal application is pending. During the period following the filing of renewal applications, petitions to deny license renewals can be filed by interested parties, including members of the public. Generally, the FCC renews a broadcast license upon a finding that (i) the broadcast station has served the public interest, convenience and necessity; (ii) there have been no serious violations by the licensee of the Communications Act or the FCC’s rules; and (iii) there have been no other violations by the licensee of the Communications Act or other FCC rules that, when taken together, indicate a pattern of abuse. Historically, FCC licenses have generally been renewed. The most recent renewal cycle started in June 2019 and concluded in April 2022. All of our radio stations’ licenses were renewed for full eight-year terms. The next renewal cycle will begin in June 2027. The non-renewal, or renewal with substantial conditions or modifications, of one or more of our licenses could have a material adverse effect on our business.

The FCC classifies each AM and FM radio station. An AM radio station operates on either a clear channel, regional channel or local channel. A clear channel is one on which AM radio stations are assigned to serve wide areas, particularly at night. The minimum and maximum facilities requirements for an FM radio station are determined by its class. Possible FM class designations depend upon the geographic zone in which the transmitter of the FM radio station is located.

The FCC also permits AM and FM radio stations to operate FM translators and FM stations to operate FM booster stations. These are low power secondary stations that retransmit the programming of a primary radio station to portions of the station’s service area that the primary signal does not reach because of distance or terrain barriers. Boosters operate on the same frequency as the station being retransmitted and translators operate on a different frequency. The FCC permits FM booster stations to originate content that is different from the programming on a primary station for up to three minutes per hour. Stations can set up specific areas or zones with a different booster for each zone to allow the boosters to provide geo-targeted content to specific portions of a station’s service area.

Several of our AM stations operate FM translators. Since translators are secondary to full power stations, it is possible that translators we operate could be displaced by full power stations. Full power stations may bring an interference complaint if they experience interference from a translator in an area that is inside the full power station’s 45 dBu contour.

Rules to allow AM stations to voluntarily convert to all-digital operations became effective in 2021.

Low power FM (“LPFM”) stations operate in the existing FM radio band with a maximum operating power of 100 watts. FCC regulations regarding eligibility for and licensing of low power FM radio stations have expanded licensing opportunities for LPFM stations. Implementation of a low power radio service provides an additional audio programming service that could compete with our radio stations for listeners. In April 2020, the FCC adopted an Order revising technical rules applicable to LPFM stations to provide LPFM licensees with more flexibility, including allowing the use of FM boosters. In December 2023, the FCC allowed applicants seeking to operate new LPFM stations to file applications, and has subsequently granted at least 635 of these applications.

Rules and Regulations Regarding Indecency and Sponsorship ID. The FCC’s rules prohibit the broadcast of obscene material at any time and indecent material between the hours of 6 am and 10 pm. Broadcasters’ risk of violating the prohibition on the broadcast of indecent material is increased by the vagueness of the FCC’s definition of indecent material, coupled with the spontaneity of live programming. The FCC has expanded the breadth of indecency regulation to include material that could be considered “blasphemy,” “personally reviling epithets,” “profanity” and vulgar or coarse words, amounting to a nuisance. The maximum permitted fine for an indecency violation is $508,373 per incident and $4,692,668 for any continuing violation arising from a single act or failure to act. Because the FCC may investigate indecency complaints prior to notifying a licensee of the existence of a complaint, a licensee may not have knowledge of a complaint unless and until the complaint results in the issuance of a formal FCC letter of inquiry or notice of apparent liability for forfeiture. The FCC has advised that it will continue to pursue enforcement actions in egregious cases. We cannot predict whether Congress will consider or adopt further legislation in this area.

FCC regulations require a radio station to include an on-air announcement that identifies the sponsor of all advertisements and other content broadcast by any radio station for which any money, service or other valuable consideration is received. Fines for such

violations can be substantial as they are dependent on the number of times a particular advertisement is broadcast. In February 2025, the FCC issued an Enforcement Advisory reminding radio broadcasters that manipulating airplay based on an artist's willingness to participate in station promotions or events is illegal unless stations broadcast appropriate sponsorship identification announcements. The FCC has adopted rules that require broadcast stations to disclose when foreign governmental entities have paid a station, directly or indirectly, to broadcast programming under a lease time agreement. Radio stations are required to take certain actions to determine if an entity leasing airtime from the station is covered by the new rules. Under rules that have been adopted but will not become effective until at least June 2026, licensees must obtain from entities that lease airtime on a station either a written certification using a certification template provided by the FCC or screenshots of certain governmental websites for foreign media outlets showing that the lessee is not listed on the websites. The FCC has clarified that the rules will apply not only to leases of programming time, but also to issue advertisements and paid public service announcements.

Transfers or Assignment of License. The Communications Act prohibits the assignment of broadcast licenses or the transfer of control of a broadcast licensee without the prior approval of the FCC. In determining whether to grant such approval, the FCC considers, among other things:

To obtain FCC consent to assign or transfer control of a broadcast license, appropriate applications must be filed with the FCC. Interested parties, including members of the public, have the opportunity to file objections against assignment and transfer of control applications.

Multiple Ownership Rules. The Communications Act and FCC rules impose specific limits on the number of commercial radio stations an entity can own, directly or by attribution, in a single market, and the combination of radio stations, television stations and newspapers that any entity can own, directly or by attribution, in a single market. Digital radio channels authorized for AM and FM stations do not count as separate “stations” for purposes of the ownership limits. The radio multiple ownership rules may preclude us from acquiring certain radio stations we might otherwise seek to acquire. The ownership rules also effectively prevent us from selling radio stations in a market to a buyer that has reached its ownership limit in the market unless that buyer divests other radio stations. The FCC’s ownership rules that are currently in effect and apply to our broadcast holdings are briefly summarized below.

Local Radio Ownership Rule. The local radio ownership rule establishes the following limits:

For stations located in a market in which the Nielsen Audio ratings service provides ratings, the definition of “radio market” is based on the radio market to which BIA Kelsey reports assign the affected radio stations. For stations that are not in a Nielsen Audio market, the market definition is based on technical service areas. The FCC’s rules also provide that parties which own groups of radio stations that comply with the previous (contour-based) multiple ownership rules, but do not comply with the current limits, will be allowed to retain those groups on a “grandfathered” basis, but will not be allowed to transfer or assign those groups intact. Under these rules, our ability to transfer or assign our radio stations as a group to a single buyer in one of our current markets may be limited.

Ownership Attribution. The FCC generally applies its ownership limits to attributable interests held by an individual, corporation, partnership or other entity. An “attributable” interest for purposes of the FCC’s broadcast ownership rules generally includes: (i) equity and debt interests which combined exceed 33% of a licensee’s total assets, if the interest holder supplies more than 15% of the licensee’s total weekly programming, or has an attributable same-market media interest, whether television or radio; (ii) a 5% or greater direct or indirect voting stock interest, including certain interests held in trust, unless the holder is a qualified passive

investor in which case the threshold is a 20% or greater voting stock interest; (iii) any equity interest in a limited liability company or a partnership, including a limited partnership, unless properly “insulated” from management activities; and (iv) any position as an officer or director of a licensee or its direct or indirect parent. In addition, the interests of minority shareholders in a corporation generally are not attributable if a single entity or individual controls 50% or more of that corporation’s voting stock.

Foreign Ownership Rules. The Communications Act prohibits the issuance or holding of broadcast licenses by persons who are not U.S. citizens, whom the FCC rules refer to as “aliens,” including any corporation organized under the laws of a foreign country or of which more than 20% of its capital stock is owned or voted by aliens. In addition, the FCC may prohibit any corporation from holding a broadcast license if the corporation is controlled by any other corporation of which more than 25% of the capital stock is owned of record or voted by aliens. The FCC has interpreted this provision of the Communications Act to require an affirmative public interest finding before a broadcast licensee may be granted or held by such an entity. The FCC reviews situations in which foreigners own more than 25% of a holding company of an entity that holds a broadcast license on a case by case basis. Entities seeking such review are required to request the FCC to issue a declaratory ruling permitting the proposed foreign ownership. In acting upon such requests, the FCC will coordinate with Executive Branch agencies on national security, law enforcement, foreign policy and other policy issues. The rules also specify how public companies should monitor foreign ownership compliance and provide for remedial provisions in the event a public company determines that it has exceeded its foreign ownership limits. The FCC’s rules permit a broadcast licensee to file a petition with the FCC seeking approval for a proposed foreign investor to own up to 100% of the controlling parent entity and for a non-controlling foreign investor identified in the request to increase its equity and/or voting interest in a parent entity at a future time up to 49.9 percent. The FCC has adopted rules to streamline the timeline for the required review of these requests by Executive Branch agencies and to require licensees to respond to a standardized set of national security and law enforcement questions. Our certificate of incorporation prohibits the ownership, voting and transfer of our capital stock in violation of the FCC restrictions, and prohibits the issuance of capital stock or the voting rights such capital stock represents to or for the account of aliens or corporations otherwise subject to domination or control by aliens in excess of the FCC limits. The certificate of incorporation authorizes our board of directors (the "Board") to enforce these prohibitions.

Time Brokerage and Joint Sales Agreements. It is not uncommon for radio stations to enter into agreements under which separately owned and licensed radio stations agree to enter into cooperative arrangements of varying sorts, subject to compliance with the requirements of antitrust laws and with the FCC’s rules and policies. Under these arrangements, separately owned radio stations could agree to function cooperatively in programming, advertising sales and similar matters, subject to the requirement that the licensee of each radio station maintain independent control over the programming and operations of its own radio station.

The FCC’s rules provide that a radio station that brokers more than 15% of the weekly broadcast time on another radio station serving the same market or sells more than 15% of the other station’s advertising time per week will be considered to have an attributable ownership interest in the other radio station for purposes of the FCC’s local radio ownership limits.

FCC rules that had also prohibited a broadcast station from duplicating more than 25% of its programming on another radio station serving substantially the same area in the same broadcast service, that is AM-AM or FM-FM, either through common ownership of the two radio stations or through a time brokerage agreement, were eliminated in October 2020. In June 2024, the FCC reinstated the rule in response to requests for reconsideration filed by several parties.

Quadrennial Review of Ownership Rules. The FCC is required to review quadrennially the media ownership rules and determine if the rules remain necessary in the public interest as a result of competition. After a protracted legal battle, the FCC's 2017 elimination of the newspaper-broadcast and radio-television cross-ownership rules, and certain changes to the local television ownership rule became effective in June 2021. In December 2023, the FCC issued an Order in the 2018 quadrennial review concluding that no significant changes to any of the multiple ownership rules were necessary. The Order made permanent the contour overlap method used to evaluate the number of radio stations in areas that are outside Nielsen rated markets. Several broadcasters, including the Company, filed an appeal of the FCC’s Order. In July 2025, a federal court overturned certain parts of the FCC’s regulation of television ownership but left the Local Radio Ownership Rule intact. In September 2025, the FCC released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the 2022 quadrennial review seeking updated public comment on the FCC’s broadcast ownership rules, including the Local Radio Ownership Rule, and whether the FCC should modify or eliminate the rules in response to changes and competition in the media marketplace. We have filed comments recommending that the Local Radio Ownership rule be eliminated.

Programming and Operations. The Communications Act requires broadcasters to serve the public interest. The FCC gradually has relaxed or eliminated many of the more formalized procedures it had developed in the past to promote the broadcast of certain types of programming responsive to the needs of a radio station’s community of license. Under the currently effective rules, a licensee is required to present programming that is responsive to issues of the radio station’s community of license and to maintain records demonstrating this responsiveness. All of our radio stations are required to maintain their public inspection files online on an FCC maintained website. This means that the materials in these stations’ public files are widely accessible. Radio stations also must pay regulatory and application fees and follow various rules promulgated under the Communications Act. Those rules regulate, among other things, political advertising, sponsorship identifications, the advertisement of contests and lotteries, employment

practices, broadcast of obscene and indecent content, and technical operations, including limits on human exposure to radio frequency radiation.

The FCC’s rules on equal employment opportunities prohibit employment discrimination by radio stations on the basis of race, religion, color, national origin, and gender; and require broadcasters to implement programs to promote equal employment opportunities at their radio stations. The rules generally require broadcasters to widely disseminate information about full-time job openings to all segments of the community to ensure that all qualified applicants have sufficient opportunity to apply for the job, to send job vacancy announcements to recruitment organizations and others in the community indicating an interest in all or some vacancies at the radio station, and to implement a number of specific longer-term recruitment outreach efforts, such as job fairs, internship programs, and interaction with educational and community groups from among a menu of approaches itemized by the FCC. The FCC permits broadcast stations to use online job postings as their sole means of recruiting, as long as online postings reach all segments of a broadcaster’s community.

Content Licenses and Royalties. We must pay royalties to copyright owners of musical compositions (typically, songwriters and publishers) whenever we broadcast or stream musical compositions. Copyright owners of musical compositions most often rely on intermediaries known as performing rights organizations (“PROs”) to negotiate licenses with copyright users for the public performance of their compositions, collect royalties under such licenses and distribute them to copyright owners. We have obtained public performance licenses from, and pay license fees to, the four major PROs in the U.S., which are the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (“ASCAP”), Broadcast Music, Inc. (“BMI”), SESAC LLC (“SESAC”) and Global Music Rights LLC (“GMR”). There is no guarantee that additional PROs will not emerge, which could impact, and in some circumstances increase, our royalty rates and negotiation costs.

To secure the rights to stream music content over the Internet, we also must obtain performance rights licenses and pay public performance royalties to copyright owners of sound recordings (typically, performing artists and record companies). Under Federal statutory licenses, we are permitted to stream any lawfully released sound recordings and to make ephemeral reproductions of these recordings on our computer servers without having to separately negotiate and obtain direct licenses with each individual copyright owner as long as we operate in compliance with the rules of those statutory licenses and pay the applicable royalty rates to Sound Exchange, the organization designated by the Copyright Royalty Board (“CRB”) to collect and distribute royalties under these statutory licenses. From time to time, Sound Exchange notifies us that certain calendar years are subject to routine audits of our royalty payments. The results of such audits could result in higher royalty payments for the subject years.

The rates at which we pay royalties to copyright owners are privately negotiated or set pursuant to a regulatory process. Increased royalty rates could significantly increase our expenses, which could adversely affect our business. There is no guarantee that the licenses and associated royalty rates that currently are available to us will be available to us in the future. In addition, Congress may consider and adopt legislation that would require us to pay royalties to sound recording copyright owners for broadcasting those recordings on our terrestrial radio stations.

Removal of AM Radio Receivers by Car Manufacturers. In 2023, several automobile manufacturers announced plans to remove AM radio receivers from certain new vehicles. Following these announcements, legislation known as the AM for Every Vehicle Act was introduced in Congress. The legislation proposed that the Department of Transportation complete a rulemaking proceeding within one year to mandate that AM receivers be included as a standard feature in all cars sold in the United States. Although the legislation received bipartisan support, it was not passed prior to the conclusion of the 118th Congress in December 2024. The same legislation has been reintroduced in the 119th Congress and is pending. The removal of AM receivers by automobile manufacturers could affect the operation and profitability of our AM radio stations.

Proposed and Recent Changes. Congress, the FCC and other federal agencies are considering, or may in the future consider and adopt new laws, regulations and policies regarding a wide variety of matters that could affect, directly or indirectly, the operation, ownership and profitability of our radio stations, including the loss of audience share and advertising revenues for our radio stations, and an inability to acquire additional radio stations or to finance those acquisitions. Such matters may include:

The FCC has also adopted procedures for the auction of broadcast spectrum in circumstances where two or more parties have filed for new or major change applications that are mutually exclusive. Such procedures may limit our efforts to modify or expand the broadcast signals of our radio stations.

We cannot predict what other matters might be considered in the future by the FCC or Congress, nor can we judge in advance what impact, if any, the implementation of any of these proposals or changes might have on our business.

Federal Antitrust Laws. The agencies responsible for enforcing the federal antitrust laws, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) or the Department of Justice, may investigate certain acquisitions. In December 2023, they jointly issued revised federal merger guidelines, which may result in more mergers being subject to review. The Department of Justice and the FTC have reviewed numerous potential radio acquisitions where an operator proposed to acquire an additional station in its existing markets or multiple stations in new markets, and has challenged a number of such transactions. Some of these challenges have resulted in consent decrees requiring the sale of certain stations. We cannot predict the outcome of any specific FTC or Department of Justice investigation or how the revised merger guidelines will impact radio industry mergers and acquisitions. Any decision by the FTC or the Department of Justice to challenge a proposed acquisition could affect our ability to consummate the acquisition or to consummate it on the proposed terms.

For an acquisition meeting certain size thresholds, the Hart-Scott-Rodino (“HSR”) Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 requires the parties to file Notification and Report Forms concerning antitrust issues with the FTC and the Department of Justice and to observe specified waiting period requirements before consummating the acquisition. In October 2024, the FTC finalized significant updates to the HSR guidelines that increase the amount and types of information that must be reported.

Regulation of the Internet

Our business is subject to privacy and data protection legislation and regulation. We obtain information from users of our technology platforms, including, without limitation, our websites, web pages, applications, social media pages, and mobile applications (“Platforms”), in accordance with the privacy policies and terms of use posted on the applicable Platform. We collect personally identifiable information directly from Platform users in several ways, including when a user registers to use our services, fills out a listener profile, posts comments, uses our social networking features, participates in polls and contests and signs up to receive email newsletters. We use and share this information for a variety of business purposes, including for analytics, attribution and to manage and execute digital advertising campaigns in a variety of ways.

We are subject to several laws and regulations relating to consumer protection, information security, data protection and privacy. Many of these laws and regulations are still evolving and could be interpreted in ways that could harm our business or limit the services we are able to offer. In the areas of information security and data protection, the laws in several states in the United States and most countries require companies to implement specific information security controls and legal protections to protect certain types of personally identifiable information. Likewise, most states in the United States and most countries have laws in place requiring companies to notify users if there is a security breach that compromises certain categories of their personally identifiable information. Any failure on our part to comply with these laws may subject us to significant liabilities. For example, the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) establishes a new privacy framework that expands the definition of personal information, establishes new data

privacy rights for consumers residing in the State of California, imposes special rules on the collection of consumer data from minors, creates new notice obligations and new limits on the sale of personal information, and creates a new and potentially severe statutory damages framework for (i) violations of the CCPA and (ii) businesses that fail to implement reasonable security procedures and practices to prevent data breaches. Our websites are also subject to regulation relating to acquisition of personal information from children under the age of 13, including the federal Child Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”) and the federal Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act (“CAN-SPAM”). Additional federal, state, and territorial laws and regulations may be adopted with respect to the Internet or other online services, covering such issues as user privacy, child safety, data security, advertising, product and service endorsements, pricing, content, copyrights and trademarks, access by persons with disabilities, distribution, taxation and characteristics and quality of products and services.

HD Radio

The FCC allows AM and FM radio stations to use In-Band On-Channel technology for digital operations. The technology is also known as “HD Radio.” The advantages of digital audio broadcasting over traditional analog broadcasting technology include improved sound quality, the ability to broadcast additional channels, and the ability to offer a greater variety of auxiliary services. We currently utilize HD Radio digital technology on most of our stations. In September 2024, the FCC adopted an Order modifying certain rules applicable to HD radio operations that will improve digital FM signal quality and coverage while minimizing harmful interference to adjacent-channel stations and will permit licensees to implement changes through a notification procedure.

Seasonality

Seasonal revenue fluctuations are common in the radio broadcasting industry and are due primarily to fluctuations in advertising expenditures. Our net revenues are typically lowest in the first quarter and generally higher in the second and fourth quarters of the year. In addition, our revenues tend to fluctuate between years, consistent with, among other things, increased advertising expenditures in even-numbered years by political candidates, political parties and special interest groups. This political spending typically is heaviest during the fourth quarter of such years.

Human Capital Resources

As of April 1, 2026, we had a staff of 460 full-time employees and 244 part-time employees. We are a party to two separate collective bargaining agreements with the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists. Both agreements automatically renew for successive one-year periods unless either party gives a notice of proposed termination at least 60 days prior to a renewal date. We consider our relations with our employees to be good.

Environmental

As the owner, lessee or operator of various real properties and facilities, we are subject to federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. Historically, compliance with these laws and regulations has not had a material adverse effect on our business. There can be no assurance, however, that compliance with existing or new environmental laws and regulations will not require us to make significant expenditures in the future.

Available Information

Our internet address is www.bbgi.com. You may obtain through our website, free of charge, copies of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These reports will be available as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish such material to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

The SEC maintains an internet site, www.sec.gov, that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Our disclosure and analysis in this annual report on Form 10-K concerning our operations, cash flows and financial position, including, in particular, the likelihood of our success in developing and expanding our business, includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Statements that are predictive in nature, that depend upon or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates” and similar expressions are forward-looking statements. Although these statements are based upon assumptions that we consider reasonable, they are subject to risks and uncertainties that described more fully below. Accordingly, we can give no assurance that we will achieve the results anticipated or implied by our forward-looking statements.

There can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the continued listing standards of the Nasdaq Global Market or that we will continue to be listed on Nasdaq or make periodic filings with the SEC.

Our Class A common stock is currently listed for trading on the Nasdaq Global Market, and we must satisfy certain continued listing requirements to maintain the listing. On April 27, 2023, we received a written notice (the “April Notice”) from the Listing Qualifications Department of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) notifying us that, for the last 30 consecutive business days, the bid price for our Class A common stock had closed below the $1.00 per share minimum bid price requirement for continued inclusion on the Nasdaq Global Market pursuant to Nasdaq Listing Rule 5450(a)(1) (the “Minimum Bid Price Requirement”). On May 19, 2023, we received a notice from Nasdaq notifying us that we had regained compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement and that the matter was closed. On October 13, 2023, we received a written notice (the “October Notice”) from the Listing Qualifications Department of Nasdaq notifying us that, for the last 30 consecutive business days, the bid price for our Class A common stock had closed below the Minimum Bid Price Requirement. After completing the Reverse Stock Split, on October 8, 2024, we received a written notice that we had regained compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement.

However, there can be no assurance that we will continue to maintain compliance with Nasdaq listing requirements, continue to be listed on Nasdaq or continue to make periodic filings with the SEC.

If we are delisted due to a failure to maintain compliance with Nasdaq listing requirements or voluntarily delist from Nasdaq, but obtain a substitute listing for our Class A common stock, it will likely be on a market with less liquidity, and therefore experience potentially more price volatility than experienced on Nasdaq. Stockholders may not be able to sell their shares of our Class A common stock on any such substitute market in the quantities, at the times, or at the prices that could potentially be available on a more liquid trading market. As a result of these factors, if our Class A common stock is delisted from Nasdaq, the value and liquidity of our Class A common stock would likely be significantly adversely affected. In addition, if we discontinue our obligation to make periodic filings with the SEC, by delisting our securities with Nasdaq and deregistering our securities pursuant to the Exchange Act, there would be a substantial decrease in disclosure about our Company on an ongoing basis.

We face risks related to health epidemics, natural disasters, war, terrorism and other catastrophes, which have materially and adversely affected our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

We are subject to social and natural catastrophic events that are beyond our control, such as health epidemics, including the COVID-19 pandemic, natural disasters and other catastrophes, which have materially and adversely affected our business and may continue to materially and adversely affect our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

We may be adversely affected by the effects of inflation.

Inflation has the potential to adversely affect our liquidity, business, financial condition and results of operations by increasing our overall cost structure, particularly if we are unable to achieve commensurate increases in the prices we charge our customers. The existence of inflation in the economy has resulted in, and may continue to result in, elevated or higher interest rates and capital costs, increased costs of labor, weakening exchange rates and other similar effects. As a result of inflation, we have experienced, and may continue to experience, cost increases, and our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity could be materially adversely affected.

The radio broadcasting industry faces many unpredictable business risks and is sensitive to external economic forces that could have a material adverse effect on our advertising revenues and results of operations.

Our future operations are subject to many business risks, including those risks that specifically influence the radio broadcasting industry, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. These risks include, but are not limited to:

The main source of our revenue is the sale of advertising. Our ability to sell advertising can be affected by, among other things:

In addition, we believe that, for most businesses, advertising is a discretionary business expense, meaning that spending on advertising tends to decline disproportionately during an economic recession or downturn, as compared to other types of business spending.

Further, our operations and revenues also tend to be seasonal in nature, with generally lower revenue generated in the first quarter of the year and generally higher revenue generated in the second and fourth quarters of the year. The seasonality of our business reflects the adult orientation of our formats and relationship between advertising purchases on these formats and the retail cycle. This seasonality causes, and will likely continue to cause, a variation in our quarterly operating results. Such variations could have a material effect on the timing of our cash flows. In addition, our revenues tend to fluctuate between years, consistent with, among other things, increased advertising expenditures in even-numbered years by political candidates, political parties, political action committees and special interest groups. This political spending typically is heaviest during the fourth quarter of such years.

Additionally, unfavorable changes in economic conditions, political conditions, labor conditions, changing laws or tariffs, unfavorable trade policies or regulations, as well as declining consumer confidence, recession and other factors could lead to decreased demand for advertising and negatively impact our advertising revenues and our results of operations. These factors, along with regulatory changes, executive orders and enforcement priorities, may impact customer budgets and create uncertainty about how such laws and regulations will be interpreted and applied, which may impact advertising demand and adversely impact our business. Additionally, lapses in U.S. federal government funding, such as the government shutdown experienced in the U.S. in October 2025, and other disruptions to government agency operations may have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations. We cannot predict with accuracy the timing or duration of any economic downturn generally, or in the markets in which our advertisers operate. If the economic environment does worsen, there can be no assurance that we will not experience a decline in revenues, which may negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations.

Our stations may not be able to compete effectively in their respective markets for advertising revenues, which could adversely affect our revenue and cash flows.

We operate in a highly competitive business. A decline in our audience share or advertising rates in a particular market may cause a decline in the revenue and cash flows of our stations located in that market. Our stations compete for audiences and advertising revenues within their respective markets directly with other stations, as well as with other media platforms and companies selling

digital advertising. These other media platforms include broadcast television, digital, satellite and cable television, video streaming services, newspapers and magazines, outdoor advertising, direct mail, internet radio, satellite radio, smart phones, tablets, and other wireless media, the internet, social media, smart speakers, podcasts and other forms of advertising. Our radio stations also compete for audiences and advertising revenues within their respective markets directly with Amazon, Apple, Meta and Alphabet.

Our stations could suffer a reduction in audience ratings or advertising revenue and could incur increased promotional and other expenses if:

Other radio broadcasting companies may enter into markets in which we operate or may operate in the future. These companies may be larger and have more financial resources than we have. As a result, our stations may not be able to maintain or increase their current audience ratings and advertising revenues.

Further, advertising revenue may vary from even- to odd-numbered years based on the volatility and unpredictability of political advertising revenue. Political advertising revenue from elections, which is generally greater in even-numbered years when federal elections occur, has the potential to create fluctuations in our operating results on a year-to-year basis. In addition, political advertising revenue is dependent on the level of political advertising expenditures and competitiveness of particular races within each local market.

If we are unable to develop compelling and differentiated digital content, products and services, or maintain or increase our digital advertising revenue, our advertising revenues could be adversely affected.

In order to attract consumers and generate increased activity on our digital properties, we believe that we must offer compelling and differentiated content, products and services. However, acquiring, developing, and offering such content, products and services may require significant costs and time to develop, while consumer tastes may be difficult to predict and are subject to rapid change. If we are unable to provide content, products and services that are sufficiently attractive to our digital users, we may not be able to generate the increases in activity necessary to generate increased advertising revenues. In addition, although we have access to certain content provided by our other businesses, we may be required to make substantial payments to license such content. Many of our content arrangements with third parties are non-exclusive, so competitors may be able to offer similar or identical content. If we are not able to acquire or develop compelling content and do so at reasonable prices, or if other companies offer content that is similar to that provided by our digital department, we may not be able to attract and increase the engagement of digital consumers on our digital properties.

Continued growth in our digital business also depends on our ability to continue offering a competitive and distinctive range of advertising products and services for advertisers and publishers and our ability to maintain or increase prices for our advertising products and services. Continuing to develop and improve these products and services requires significant time and costs. If we cannot continue to develop and improve our advertising products and services, or if prices for our advertising products and services decrease, our digital advertising revenues could be adversely affected. We are highly dependent on our digital business, and any termination, change or decrease in our relationships with our largest digital advertising clients could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and profitability. If we do not maintain or increase our digital revenue, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

Our success is dependent upon audience acceptance of our content, particularly our audio programs, which is difficult to predict.

Media and audio content production and distribution are inherently risky businesses because the revenues derived from the production and distribution of media content or an audio program, and the licensing of rights to the intellectual property associated with the content or program, depend primarily upon their acceptance and perceptions by the public, which are difficult to predict. The commercial success of content or a program also depends upon the quality and acceptance of other competing programs released into the marketplace at or near the same time, the availability of alternative forms of entertainment and leisure time activities, general economic conditions, and other tangible and intangible factors, all of which are difficult to predict.

Ratings for broadcast stations and the amount of traffic on a particular website are also factors that are weighed when advertisers determine which outlets to use and in determining the advertising rates that the outlet receives. Poor ratings or traffic levels can lead to

a reduction in pricing and advertising revenues. For example, if there is an event causing a change of programming at one of our stations, there could be no assurance that any replacement programming would generate the same level of ratings, revenues, or profitability as the previous programming. In addition, changes in ratings methodology and technology could adversely impact our ratings and negatively affect our advertising revenues.

Finally, the costs of developing and distributing content and programming most popular with the public may change significantly if new performance royalties (such as those that have been proposed by members of Congress from time to time) are imposed upon radio broadcasters or internet operators, and such changes could have a material impact upon our business.

We may not remain competitive if we do not adapt or respond to changes in technology, standards and services that affect our industry.

The radio broadcasting industry is subject to rapid technological change, evolving industry standards and the emergence of alternate media platforms, standards, technologies and services. We may not have the resources to acquire and deploy other technologies or to introduce new services that could compete with these other technologies. Competition arising from other technologies or regulatory changes may have an adverse effect on the radio broadcasting industry or on our Company. Various other audio technologies and services that have been developed and introduced include:

These and other new technologies have the potential to change the means by which advertisers can reach target audiences most effectively. We cannot predict the effect, if any, that competition arising from other technologies or legal or regulatory change may have on the radio broadcasting industry or on our financial condition and results of operations. For example, as discussed above, the AM for Every Vehicle Act is pending in Congress. If this legislation is not passed, the removal of AM receivers by automobile manufacturers could affect the operation and profitability of our AM radio stations.

Such new media and technology has resulted in increased fragmentation in the advertising market, and we cannot predict the effect, if any, that additional competition arising from new technologies may have across our business or our financial condition and results of operations, which may be adversely affected if we are not able to adapt successfully to these new media technologies or distribution platforms. The continuing growth and evolution of channels and platforms have increased our challenges in differentiating ourselves from other media platforms. We continually seek to develop and enhance our content offerings and distribution platforms/methodologies. Failure to effectively execute these efforts, actions by our competitors, or other failures to deliver content effectively could hurt our ability to differentiate ourselves from our competitors and, as a result, have adverse effects across our business.

We are dependent on federally issued licenses to operate our stations and are subject to extensive federal regulation.

The radio broadcasting industry is subject to extensive regulation by the FCC under the Communications Act. We are required to obtain licenses from the FCC to operate our stations. Our business depends upon maintaining our broadcast licenses, which are issued by the FCC for a term of eight years and are renewable. Although the vast majority of FCC radio station licenses are routinely renewed, we cannot assure you that the FCC will approve our future renewal applications or that the renewals will be for full eight-year terms or will not include conditions or qualifications that could adversely affect our operations. The non-renewal, or renewal with substantial conditions or modifications, of one or more of our licenses could have a material adverse effect on us. All our station

licenses were renewed for full eight-year terms in the most recent renewal cycle, which concluded in August 2022. The next renewal cycle begins in June 2027.

We must comply with extensive FCC regulations and policies regarding the ownership and operation of our stations. FCC regulations limit the number of radio stations that a licensee can own in a market, which could restrict our ability to consummate any future transactions, and in certain circumstances, could require us to divest one or more stations. Online music services such as Amazon Music Unlimited, Apple Music, Pandora and Spotify are not regulated by the FCC; therefore, they are not subject to any ownership restrictions or FCC regulations governing their operations. Our ability to compete with online music services may be impeded because of the extensive FCC regulations to which we are subject. The FCC also requires radio stations to comply with certain technical requirements to limit interference between two or more radio stations. Possible changes in interference protections, creation of additional classes of FM stations, spectrum allocations and other technical rules may negatively affect the operation of our stations. If the FCC relaxes certain technical requirements, it could impair the signals transmitted by our stations and could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, the FCC has increased its enforcement of certain regulations, including regulations requiring a radio station to include an on-air announcement which identifies the sponsor of all advertisements and other content broadcast by any radio station for which any money, service or other valuable consideration is received, requiring all radio stations to maintain complete and timely online public inspection files hosted on an FCC database that is easily accessible by members of the public and the FCC, and prohibiting the transmission of EAS tones or simulations thereof in the absence of an actual emergency or authorized test. Moreover, these FCC regulations and others may change over time, and we cannot assure you that those changes would not have a material adverse effect on us.

The FCC regulates FM translator stations as a secondary service, and in the event that an FM translator station causes actual interference to the signal of a radio or television station, FCC rules require the FM translator station to eliminate the interference and to suspend operations if the interference cannot be eliminated. If the FCC requires any FM translator station that we operate to modify its facilities to eliminate interference caused to another station or to cease broadcasting, it could materially impair the operations of the station that the FM translator rebroadcasts which could have a material adverse effect on us.

Enforcement of the FCC’s indecency rules could have a material adverse effect on our business.

The FCC’s rules prohibit the broadcast of obscene material at any time and indecent material between the hours of 6 a.m. and 10 p.m. The risk of violating the prohibition on the broadcast of indecent material is increased by the vagueness of the FCC’s definition of indecent material, coupled with the spontaneity of live programming. The FCC has expanded the breadth of indecency regulation to include material that could be considered “blasphemy,” “personally reviling epithets,” “profanity” and vulgar or coarse words amounting to a nuisance. As a result, in the event that we broadcast material falling within the expanded breadth of the FCC’s regulation, we could be subject to license revocation, or renewal or qualifications proceedings, which would put the licenses that we depend on for our operations in jeopardy. In 2007, the monetary penalties for broadcasting indecent programming increased substantially. The current maximum permitted fines for an indecency violation is $508,373 per incident and $4,692,668 for any continuing violation arising from a single act or failure to act. The FCC has advised that it will continue to pursue enforcement actions in egregious cases while it conducts a review of its indecency policy generally. Because the FCC may investigate indecency complaints prior to notifying a licensee of the existence of a complaint, a licensee may not have knowledge of a complaint unless and until the complaint results in the issuance of a formal FCC letter of inquiry or notice of apparent liability for forfeiture.

We may in the future become subject to additional inquiries or proceedings related to our stations’ broadcast of indecent or obscene material. To the extent that these pending inquiries or other proceedings result in the imposition of fines, revocation of any of our station licenses or denials of license renewal applications, our business and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

The royalties we pay to copyright owners could increase significantly, and proposed legislation could require radio broadcasters to pay royalties to record labels and recording artists.

We pay royalties to copyright owners of musical compositions (typically song composers and publishers) whenever we broadcast or stream musical compositions. These royalties are paid through ASCAP, BMI, SESAC, GMR, and Sound Exchange. The rates at which we pay royalties to copyright owners are privately negotiated or set pursuant to a regulatory process. Increased royalty rates could significantly increase our expenses, which could adversely affect our business. There is no guarantee that the licenses and associated royalty rates that currently are available to us will be available to us in the future. In addition, legislation has been introduced in Congress that would require radio broadcasters to pay a performance royalty to record labels and performing artists for use of their recorded songs. The proposed legislation would add an additional layer of royalties to be paid directly to the record labels and artists. It is currently unknown what proposed legislation, if any, will become law, whether industry groups will enter into an agreement with respect to performance fees, and what significance this royalty would have on our results from operations, cash flows or financial position.

We depend on selected market clusters of stations for a material portion of our net revenue.

The stations located in Boston, MA, Detroit, MI and Philadelphia, PA contributed 58% of our net revenue in 2025. Accordingly, we have greater exposure to adverse events or conditions in any of these markets, such as changes in the economy, shifts in population or demographics, or changes in audience tastes, or local government actions, which could adversely impact our results from operations, cash flows or financial position.

We are exposed to credit risk on our accounts receivable. This risk is heightened during periods of uncertain economic conditions.

Our outstanding accounts receivable are not covered by collateral or credit insurance. Credit risk on our receivables is heightened during periods of uncertain economic conditions, and there can be no assurance that our procedures to monitor and limit exposure to credit risk will be effective and enable us to avoid losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our results from operations, cash flows or financial position. We also maintain reserves to cover the uncollectibility of a portion of our accounts receivable, however, the estimate, which is based on current information, may differ from actual results.

Impairment of our FCC licenses could adversely affect our operating results.

As of December 31, 2025, our FCC licenses represented 52% of our total assets. We are required to test our FCC licenses for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that our FCC licenses might be impaired, and we have recorded impairment charges as a result of such tests and may record future impairments. We assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that our FCC licenses might be impaired. If we determine it is more likely than not that our FCC licenses are impaired, then we are required to perform a quantitative impairment test. The valuation of our FCC licenses is based on estimates rather than precise calculations. The fair value measurements for our FCC licenses use significant unobservable inputs which reflect our own assumptions about the estimates that market participants would use in measuring fair value including assumptions about risk. Material impairment charges could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. For further discussion, see “Item 7 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Estimates” of this report.

We have substantial debt that could have important consequences to you. Our ability to generate cash for, make payments on or refinance our indebtedness as it becomes due depends on many factors, some of which are beyond our control and impacts our ability to continue as a going concern.

We have debt that is substantial in relation to our accumulated deficit. As of December 31, 2025, we had long-term debt, net of an unamortized premium, of $218.6 million and stockholders' deficit of $176.4 million.

In February 2026, we failed to make a scheduled interest payment on our long-term debt. While we are in discussions with various stakeholders with respect to a number of potential alternatives regarding a restructuring of the Company’s outstanding indebtedness, as of the filing of this report, no agreement has been reached regarding the restructuring of Company’s indebtedness, and no assurances can be given as to the timing or outcome of this process.

Our long-term debt is substantial in amount and could have an impact on you. For example, it could:

Any additional borrowings or note offerings would further increase the amount of our debt and the associated risks. In addition, there can be no assurances that additional financing will be available or on terms that will be acceptable to us, or at all. If we are unable to refinance or otherwise extend our indebtedness prior to the scheduled maturity date, we may not have sufficient cash on hand to repay our long-term debt upon maturity, which would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results in the event the lenders declare an event of default and exercise their rights and remedies. We may not be successful

in improving our operations, securing additional liquidity or refinancing our outstanding indebtedness, and the feasibility of management’s strategic plans is contingent upon factors outside of our control. As such, this uncertainty raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern for at least one year from the date of issuance of the financial statements included in this annual report.

Our history of operating losses and negative cash flows from operations has raised substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern for at least one year from the date of issuance of the financial statements included in this annual report, and management has concluded there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern for at least one year from the date of issuance of the financial statements included in this annual report, and this may adversely affect our stock price, our ability to raise capital or enter into strategic transactions, and our relationships with key stakeholders.

Our financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue to operate as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. We expect to continue to incur net operating losses for the near future, and we have concluded there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern for at least one year from the date of issuance of the financial statements included in this annual report. This may adversely affect the price of our common stock, our ability to raise capital or enter into strategic transactions, and our relationship with key stakeholders. In March 2026, we entered into a Transaction Support Agreement (as defined below) with holders of a majority of our outstanding notes for certain Refinancing Transactions (as defined below), including an Exchange Offer and Tender Offer (each, as defined below), which if successfully completed would significantly reduce our outstanding indebtedness and improve our liquidity position. However, the completion of the Refinancing Transactions is subject to various conditions, and there can be no assurance that the Refinancing Transactions will be completed successfully or on the contemplated timeline. If our actions are not successful in restoring our debt covenant compliance and improving our liquidity and operating results, we may be forced to terminate, significantly curtail or cease our operations or to pursue other alternatives.

Additionally, our independent registered public accounting firm has included in its audit opinion for the year ended December 31, 2025 an explanatory paragraph that there is substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern for at least one year from the date of issuance of the financial statements. The reaction of investors to the inclusion of a going concern statement by our auditors and our substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern may materially adversely affect our share price and our ability to raise new capital or enter into strategic transactions. There is no assurance that funding will be available to us, will be obtained on favorable terms or will provide us with sufficient funds to meet our objectives. If we become unable to continue as a going concern, we may have to liquidate our assets or dissolve, and the values we receive for our assets in liquidation or dissolution could be significantly lower than the values reflected in our financial statements.

Our ability to pay regular dividends on our common stock is subject to the discretion of our Board and may be limited by our structure, statutory restrictions and restrictions imposed by the Indenture governing our Notes as well as any future agreements.

Our Board has suspended future quarterly dividend payments until it is determined that resumption of dividend payments is in the best interest of the Company’s stockholders. While we intend to pay a regular quarterly cash dividend, future payments, if any, will be at the discretion of our Board. Future quarterly dividend payments can also be changed or discontinued at any time and will be subject to limitations under the terms of the Indenture governing our Notes (as defined below), as well as any future agreements. The payment and timing of any future quarterly dividends will also depend upon, among other things, our future operations and earnings, capital requirements and surplus, general financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors deemed relevant by our Board.

Our corporate offices and several of our stations are located in areas that could be affected by hurricanes, extreme weather and other climate change conditions.

Florida is susceptible to hurricanes, and we have our corporate offices located in Naples, and stations located in other parts of Florida. These stations contributed 16% of our net revenue in 2025. Our corporate offices and our stations located in Florida and other stations located along the east coast of the United States have been materially affected by hurricanes in the past and may be materially affected in the future, which could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, our properties may be impacted by extreme weather conditions, including wildfires, floods, drought, loss of power, heat waves, heavy precipitation or storms, with increasing frequencies exacerbated by climate change and other factors in the future. We carry property damage insurance on all of our properties and business interruption insurance on some of our properties, but there can be no assurance that such insurance would be adequate to cover all of our losses related to extreme weather and climate change.

The failure or destruction of the internet, satellite systems and transmitter facilities that we depend upon to distribute our programming could adversely affect our operating results.

We use studios, satellite systems, transmitter facilities and the internet to originate and/or distribute our station programs and commercials. We rely on third-party contracts and services to operate our origination and distribution facilities. These third-party contracts and services include, but are not limited to, electrical power, satellite transponders, uplinks and downlinks and telecom circuits. We do not control these third parties or the quality, security or testing of various third-party software, hardware or infrastructure products that are utilized in our business. Distribution may be disrupted due to one or more third parties losing their ability to provide particular services to us, which could adversely affect our distribution capabilities. A disruption can be caused as a result of any number of events, such as local disasters (accidental or environmental), various acts of terrorism, power outages, cyber-attacks, major telecom connectivity failures or satellite failures. Our ability to distribute programming to station audiences may be disrupted for an undetermined period of time until alternate facilities are engaged and put online. Furthermore, until third-party services resume, the inability to originate or distribute programming could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

We are vulnerable to disruptions and security breaches of our information technology infrastructure and confidential information, which could cause material adverse effects on our business and reputation.

We rely heavily on technology, such as computer systems, hardware, software, technology infrastructure and online sites and networks for both internal and external operations, to operate our business (collectively, “IT Systems”), including our own IT Systems and those of our third-party providers. In addition, as a part of our ordinary business operations, we and certain of our third-party providers collect, process, store and maintain sensitive data, including the personal information of our clients, listeners, employees, contractors, business partners and others as well as trade secrets and other propriety business information (collectively, “Confidential Data”). The proper functioning of our IT Systems and business processes and protection of our Confidential Data is critical to the efficient operation and management of our business, our operating results and our financial condition.

Our IT Systems, and those of third-party providers, are vulnerable to damage and disruption caused by various circumstances, some of which are beyond our control. These include catastrophic events, power anomalies or outages and natural disasters, terrorist attacks, employee error or malfeasance, and, increasingly, technological risks associated with computer system or network failures, viruses or malware (including ransomware), misconfigurations, bugs or securities vulnerabilities in hardware and software, physical or electronic intrusions, and unauthorized access associated with cyber-attacks that threaten the confidentiality, integrity and availability of our IT Systems and Confidential Data. Additionally, any integration of AI in our or any third-party providers’ operations, products or services is expected to pose new or unknown cybersecurity risks. Our technology security initiatives, disaster recovery plans and security measures may not be adequate or implemented properly to prevent a material cyberattack or business disruption. Because we make extensive use of third-party providers, such as cloud computing services, successful cyberattacks that disrupt or compromise third- party IT Systems may materially impact our operations and results.

We and our third-party providers face constant cybersecurity treats and cyber-attacks, including, but not limited to, phishing attacks, ransomware attacks, and denial of service attacks. While no cyber-attack has had a material impact thus far, there can be no guarantee that a future attack will not materially impact our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, due to, among other things, the loss of Confidential Data, interruptions to our operations, damage to our reputation, and regulatory investigations or legal proceedings (including class actions). Cyberattacks are expected to accelerate on a global basis in frequency and magnitude as threat actors are increasingly sophisticated in using techniques and tools – including generative and other AI – that circumvent security controls, evade detection and remove forensic evidence. This makes detecting, investigating, remediating and recovering from attacks or incidents and avoiding a material adverse impact to our systems or information extremely challenging. We have acquired companies and may acquire companies in the future, which exposes us to additional, incremental cybersecurity risks and vulnerabilities.

In addition, our business processes and IT Systems need to be sufficiently scalable to support the future growth of our business and may require modifications or upgrades that expose us to similar risks of damage or disruption. Any material disruption, malfunction or similar challenges with our business processes or information systems, or disruptions or challenges relating to the transition to new processes, systems or providers, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Moreover, remote and hybrid working arrangements at our company (and at many third-party providers) also increase cybersecurity risks due to the challenges associated with managing remote computing assets and security vulnerabilities that are present in many non-corporate and home networks. There can be no assurance that our cybersecurity risk management program and processes, including our policies, controls, or procedures, will be fully implemented, complied with or effective in protecting our information technology systems and confidential information. We may also be required to comply with evolving cybersecurity and data protection laws, regulations, and industry standards, including incident reporting, notification and disclosure requirements, which could increase compliance costs and exposure to enforcement. Although we maintain a cyber insurance policy, there is no guarantee that such coverage will be sufficient to address costs, liabilities and damages we may incur in connection with a cybersecurity

incident, that it will cover all types of events or losses (including fines, penalties or certain categories of business interruption), or that such coverage will continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

Our business is dependent upon the proper functioning of our business processes and information systems, and modification or interruption of such systems may disrupt our business, processes and internal controls.

We rely heavily on technology, such as computer systems, hardware, software, technology infrastructure and online sites and networks for both internal and external operations, to operate our business, including our own information technology systems and the information technology systems and technology of our third-party providers. The proper functioning of our business processes and information systems is critical to the efficient operation and management of our business. If these information technology systems fail or are interrupted, our operations may be adversely affected and operating results could be harmed.

Our information technology systems, and those of third-party providers, are vulnerable to damage or disruption caused by circumstances beyond our control. These include catastrophic events, power anomalies or outages and natural disasters, and, increasingly, technological risks associated with computer system or network failures, viruses or malware, misconfigurations, bugs or securities vulnerabilities in hardware and software, physical or electronic intrusions, and unauthorized access associated with cyber-attacks that threaten the confidentiality, integrity and availability of our information technology systems and confidential information.

We and certain of our third-party vendors have been the target of cyber-attacks, including phishing attacks, ransomware attacks, and attempted denial of service attacks, and future attacks are likely to occur. While no cyber-attack has had a material impact thus far, if successful, these types of attacks could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, due to, among other things, the loss of customer data and other confidential information, interruptions to our operations, and damage to our reputation. Cyberattacks are expected to accelerate on a global basis in frequency and magnitude as threat actors are increasingly sophisticated in using techniques and tools – including generative and other AI – that circumvent security controls, evade detection and remove forensic evidence. As a result, we may be unable to detect, investigate, remediate or recover from future attacks or incidents, or to avoid a material adverse impact to our systems or information.

In addition, our business processes and information systems need to be sufficiently scalable to support the future growth of our business and may require modifications or upgrades that expose us to similar risks of damage or disruption. Any material disruption, malfunction or similar challenges with our business processes or information systems, or disruptions or challenges relating to the transition to new processes, systems or providers, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Moreover, remote and hybrid working arrangements at our company (and at many third-party providers) also increase cybersecurity risks due to the challenges associated with managing remote computing assets and security vulnerabilities that are present in many non-corporate and home networks. There can be no assurance that our cybersecurity risk management program and processes, including our policies, controls, or procedures, will be fully implemented, complied with or effective in protecting our information technology systems and confidential information.

We may lose key executives and other key employees, including on-air talent, to competing stations or other types of media competitors.

Our business depends upon the continued efforts, abilities and expertise of our executive officers and other key employees. The unique combination of skills and experience possessed by our key executives would be difficult to replace, we have lost key executives and employees in the past and the loss of other key executives or employees could impair our ability to execute our operating and acquisition strategies.

In addition, we compete for creative and performing on-air talent with other stations and radio station groups, radio networks, and other providers of syndicated content and other media such as broadcast television, digital, satellite and cable television, video streaming services, the internet, podcast producers and satellite radio. Our ability to attract and retain key personnel is an important aspect of our competitiveness. Our employees and other on-air talent are subject to change and may be lost to competitors or for other reasons. Any adverse changes in particular programs, formats or on-air talent could have a material adverse effect on our ratings and our ability to attract advertisers, which would negatively impact our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our success depends on our ability to identify, consummate and integrate acquired stations.

As part of our strategy, we have pursued, and may continue to pursue, acquisitions of additional stations. Radio broadcasting is a rapidly consolidating industry with many companies seeking to consummate acquisitions and increase their market share. In this environment, we compete with many other buyers for the acquisition of stations. Some of those competitors may be able to outbid us for acquisitions because they have greater financial resources. FCC ownership rules limit the number of stations that an entity can own in specific local markets, and in certain markets, we do not have room to acquire additional stations in the FM service or in both the AM and FM services. As a result, our ability to identify and consummate future acquisitions is uncertain.

In addition, our consummation of all future acquisitions is subject to various conditions, including FCC and other regulatory approvals. The FCC must approve any transfer of control or assignment of broadcast licenses. In addition, acquisitions may encounter intense scrutiny under federal and state antitrust laws. Any delays, injunctions, conditions or modifications by any government agencies could have a negative effect on us and result in the abandonment of all or part of attractive acquisition opportunities.

Our success also depends on our ability to integrate acquired businesses and achieve fully the strategic and financial objectives related thereto. The process of integrating acquired stations may involve numerous risks, including:

We cannot predict whether we will be successful in identifying future acquisition opportunities or what the consequences will be of any acquisitions. The failure to identify, consummate and integrate acquired stations could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

The Beasley family controls Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc., and members of the Beasley family own a substantial equity interest in Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. Their interests may conflict with yours.

The Beasley family, which includes Caroline Beasley, our Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board, Bruce Beasley, our President and a member of our Board, and Brian Beasley, our Chief Operating Officer and a member of our Board, is generally able to control the vote on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. Without the approval of the Beasley family, we will be unable to consummate transactions involving an actual or potential change in control, including transactions in which you might otherwise receive a premium for your shares over then current market prices. Shares of Class B and Class A Common Stock that members of the Beasley family beneficially own represent 92% of the total voting power of all classes of our common stock. The Beasley family will be able to direct our management and policies, except with respect to those matters requiring a class vote under the provisions of our amended certificate of incorporation, fourth amended and restated bylaws or applicable law.

Historically, we have entered into certain transactions with members of the Beasley family and affiliated entities that may conflict with the interests of our stockholders now or in the future. See “Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation – Related Party Transactions” and Note 17 to the accompanying financial statements.

Future sales by the Beasley family of our Class A Common Stock could adversely affect its market price.

Members of the Beasley family beneficially own the majority of all outstanding shares of Class B Common Stock, which is convertible to Class A Common Stock on a one-for-one basis. The market for our Class A Common Stock could change substantially if members of the Beasley family convert their shares of Class B Common Stock to shares of Class A Common Stock and then sell large amounts of shares of Class A Common Stock in the public market.

These sales, or the possibility that these sales may occur, could make it more difficult for us to raise capital by selling equity or equity-related securities in the future.

The difficulties associated with any attempt to gain control of our Company may adversely affect the price of our Class A Common Stock.

Due to their large beneficial ownership of our Class B and Class A Common Stock, members of the Beasley family control the decision whether any change of control of the Company will occur. Moreover, some provisions of our amended certificate of incorporation, fourth amended and restated bylaws and Delaware law could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us, even if a change of control could be beneficial to you. In addition, the Communications Act and FCC rules and policies limit the number of stations that one individual or entity can own, directly or by attribution, in a market. The FCC’s media ownership rules remain in flux and subject to further agency and court proceedings. The FCC is required to review its media ownership rules quadrennially and determine if the rules remain necessary in the public interest as a result of competition. FCC approval for transfers

of control of FCC licensees and assignments of FCC licenses are also required. Because of the limitations and restrictions imposed on us by these provisions and regulations, the trading price of our Class A Common Stock may be adversely affected.

There may not be an active market for our Class A Common Stock, making it difficult for you to sell your stock.

Our stock may not be actively traded in the future. An illiquid market for our stock may result in price volatility and poor execution of buy and sell orders for investors. Our stock price and trading volume have fluctuated widely for a number of reasons, including some reasons that may be unrelated to our business or results of operations. This market volatility could depress the price of our Class A Common Stock without regard to our operating performance. In addition, our operating results may be below expectations of public market analysts and investors. If this were to occur, the market price of our Class A Common Stock could decrease, perhaps significantly.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

As of April 1, 2026, we own or lease property in the following locations:

The land for office space in Augusta, GA is leased from GGB Augusta, LLC, which is held by a trust for the benefit of Caroline Beasley, our Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board, Bruce Beasley, our President and a member of our Board, Brian Beasley, our Chief Operating Officer and a member of our Board, and other members of the Beasley family.

The office space in Fayetteville, NC is leased from Beasley Family Towers, LLC, which is partially held by a trust for the benefit of Caroline Beasley, Bruce G. Beasley, Brian E. Beasley and other members of the Beasley family and partially owned directly by Caroline Beasley, Bruce G. Beasley, Brian E. Beasley and other members of the Beasley family.

In addition, we lease our principal executive offices in Naples, FL from Beasley Broadcasting Management, LLC, which is held by a trust for the benefit of Caroline Beasley, Bruce G. Beasley, Brian E. Beasley and other family members of the Beasley family.

No one property is material to us. We believe that our properties are generally in good condition and suitable for our operations. However, we continually look for opportunities to upgrade our properties and may do so in the future.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We currently and from time to time are involved in ordinary routine litigation incidental to the conduct of our business including indecency claims and related proceedings at the FCC, but we are not a party to any lawsuit or other proceedings that, in the opinion of management, is likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

We have two authorized and outstanding classes of equity securities: Class A Common Stock, $.001 par value per share, and Class B Common Stock, $.001 par value per share. The only difference between the Class A and Class B Common Stock is that Class A is entitled to one vote per share and Class B is entitled to ten votes per share. Class B is convertible into Class A shares on a one-for-one share basis under certain circumstances. Our Class A Common Stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “BBGI.” There is no established public trading market for our Class B Common Stock.

Holders

As of April 1, 2026, there were approximately 224 holders of record of our Class A Common Stock and 24 holders of record of our Class B Common Stock. The number of holders of Class A Common Stock does not count separately the number of beneficial holders whose shares are held of record by a broker or clearing agency.

Dividends

Our Board has suspended future quarterly dividend payments until it is determined that resumption of dividend payments is in the best interest of the Company’s stockholders. In addition, the Indenture governing our Notes limits our ability to pay dividends.

Repurchases of Equity Securities

On June 25, 2025, our stockholders approved the adoption of the Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. 2025 Equity Incentive Award
Plan (the “2025 Plan”), which replaced the Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (the “2007 Plan”). The 2025 Plan and the 2007 Plan, as applicable, permit us to purchase sufficient shares to fund withholding taxes in connection with the vesting of restricted stock units. The following table presents information with respect to purchases we made of our Class A Common Stock to fund withholding taxes during the three months ended December 31, 2025.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

We are a multi-platform media company whose primary business is operating radio stations throughout the United States. We offer local and national advertisers integrated marketing solutions across audio, digital and event platforms. We own and operate stations in the following markets: Augusta, GA, Boston, MA, Charlotte, NC, Detroit, MI, Fayetteville, NC, Fort Myers-Naples, FL, Las Vegas, NV, Middlesex, NJ, Monmouth, NJ, Morristown, NJ, Philadelphia, PA, and Tampa-Saint Petersburg, FL. We refer to each group of stations in each market as a market cluster. Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this report to the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” are to Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Recent Developments

On February 6, 2026, we completed the sales of substantially all of the assets used in the operations of WRXK-FM and WXKB-FM in Fort Myers, FL to a third party for $9.0 million in cash and substantially all of the assets used in the operations of WBCN-AM, WJPT-FM and WWCN-FM in Fort Myers, FL to another third party for $9.0 million in cash. We will record a gain on disposition of $12.2 million during the first quarter of 2026.

On September 29, 2025, we completed the sale of substantially all of the assets used in the operations of WPBB-FM in Tampa, FL to a third party for $8.0 million in cash. We recorded a gain on disposition of $0.4 million during the third quarter of 2025.

On June 25, 2025, our stockholders approved the adoption of the 2025 Plan. Under the 2025 Plan, we may issue up to 300,000 shares of Class A common stock in the form of equity-based awards, including restricted stock units, shares of restricted stock and stock options, to employees, consultants and non-employee directors. The restricted stock units that will be granted under the 2025 Plan will generally vest over one to five years of service. The 2025 Plan replaced the 2007 Plan, and no further awards will be granted under the 2007 Plan. However, the terms and conditions of the 2007 Plan will continue to govern any outstanding awards granted thereunder.

Going Concern Considerations

In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 205-40, the Company’s management evaluates whether there are certain conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for at least one year from the date of issuance of the financial statements included in this annual report. This evaluation includes considerations related to the Company’s forecasted liquidity and cash consumption requirements.

The Company has a history of net losses and negative operating cash flows and expects to continue to incur additional losses in the near future. Additionally, the Company has defaulted on its Existing Second Lien Notes (as defined below), see Note 22 for additional information. Although the Company continues to pursue a strategy to realize improved operations, including anticipated improvements from the Refinancing Transactions (as defined below) and related cost reductions, the timing of these realizations cannot be guaranteed to ensure liquidity is available when needed to meet the Company’s obligations. As a result of these considerations, the Company’s liquidity may be insufficient to meet its obligations for at least one year from the date of issuance of the financial statements included in this annual report, and management has concluded there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Management believes that the successful completion of the Refinancing Transactions contemplated by the Transaction Support Agreement (as defined below), including the Exchange Offer and Tender Offer (each, as defined below), would significantly improve the Company’s liquidity position and capital structure. As of the date of this filing, approximately 97% of the aggregate principal amount of the Existing Second Lien Notes have validly tendered in the Exchange Offer and provided consents to the proposed amendments to the Existing Second Lien Notes Indenture (as defined below). Upon closing, the Company would incur transaction-related cash payments, receive funding associated with the ABL Credit Facility, and replace the existing second lien cash interest obligations with the new financing structure. As a result, the liquidity benefit associated with the new ABL Credit Facility would be realized upon closing, and the reduction in required cash interest payments would begin upon closing and continue through the forecast period. However, there can be no assurances of the Company’s ability to realize these plans or successfully complete the Refinancing Transactions.

Reverse Stock Split

On September 23, 2024, the Company effected a 1-for-20 reverse stock split of the Company’s Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock (the “Reverse Stock Split”). As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, every 20 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock issued and outstanding were automatically converted into one share of Class A Common Stock, and every 20 shares

of the Company’s Class B Common Stock issued and outstanding were automatically converted into one share of Class B Common Stock. No fractional shares of Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock were issued in connection with the Reverse Stock Split. Holders of Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock received cash in lieu of fractional shares. The Reverse Stock Split had no effect on the par value of the Company’s Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock, which remained $0.001 per share, and had no effect on the number of authorized shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock. Following the Reverse Stock Split, the Class A Common Stock continued to be traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “BBGI” on a split-adjusted basis.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains “forward-looking statements” about the Company within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which relate to future, not past, events. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this document are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on the current beliefs and expectations of the Company’s management and are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements, which address the Company’s expected business and financial performance and financial condition, among other matters, contain words such as: “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” “may,” “will,” “plans,” “projects,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “seek,” “forecast,” or other similar expressions.

Forward-looking statements, by their nature, address matters that are, to different degrees, uncertain. Although the Company believes the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, it can give no assurance that the expectations will be attained or that any deviation will not be material. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties, and actual results or events may differ materially from those projected or implied in those statements. Factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:

Although we believe the expectations reflected in any of our forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results could differ materially from those projected or assumed in any of our forward-looking statements. We do not intend, and undertake no obligation, to update any forward-looking statement.

Financial Statement Presentation

The following discussion provides a brief description of certain key items that appear in our financial statements and general factors that impact these items.

Net Revenue. Our net revenue is primarily derived from the sale of commercial spots to advertisers directly or through national, regional or local advertising agencies. Revenues are reported at the amount we expect to be entitled to receive under the contract. Local revenue generally consists of commercial advertising sales, digital advertising sales and other sales to advertisers in a station’s local market, either directly to the advertiser or through the advertiser’s agency. National revenue generally consists of commercial advertising sales through advertiser agencies. National advertiser agencies generally purchase advertising for multiple markets. National sales are generally facilitated by our national representation firm, which serves as our agent in these transactions.

Our net revenue is generally determined by the advertising rates that we are able to charge and the number of advertisements that we can broadcast without jeopardizing listener levels. Advertising rates are primarily based on the following factors:

Our net revenue is affected by general economic conditions, competition and our ability to improve operations at our radio market clusters. Seasonal revenue fluctuations are also common in the radio broadcasting industry and are primarily due to variations in advertising expenditures by local and national advertisers. Our revenues typically are lowest in the first calendar quarter of the year. In addition, our revenues tend to fluctuate between years, consistent with, among other things, increased advertising expenditures in even-numbered years by political candidates, political parties and special interest groups. This political spending typically is heaviest during the fourth quarter of such years.

We use trade sales agreements to reduce cash paid for operating costs and expenses by exchanging advertising airtime for goods or services; however, we endeavor to minimize trade revenue in order to maximize cash revenue from our available airtime.

We also continue to invest in digital support services to develop and promote our station websites, applications, and other distribution platforms. We derive revenue from our websites through the sale of advertiser promotions and advertising on our websites and the sale of advertising airtime during audio streaming of our stations over the internet. We also generate revenue from selling third-party digital products and services.

Operating Expenses. Our operating expenses consist primarily of programming, engineering, sales, advertising and promotion, and general and administrative expenses incurred at our stations. We strive to control our operating expenses by centralizing certain functions at our corporate offices and consolidating certain functions in each of our market clusters.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and related disclosures. We consider an accounting estimate to be critical if:

Accounts Receivable. We continually evaluate our ability to collect our accounts receivable. We determine the allowance for credit losses based on historical information, relative improvements or deteriorations in the age of the accounts receivable changes in current economic conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts of future economic conditions. This ongoing evaluation requires management judgment, and if we had made different assumptions about these factors, the allowance for credit losses could have been materially different.

Property and Equipment. We are required to assess the recoverability of our property and equipment whenever an event has occurred that may result in an impairment loss. If such an event occurs, we will compare estimates of related future undiscounted cash flows to the carrying amount of the asset. If the future undiscounted cash flow estimates are less than the carrying amount of the asset, we will reduce the carrying amount to the estimated fair value. The determination of when an event has occurred and estimates of future cash flows and fair value all require management judgment. The use of different assumptions or estimates may result in alternative assessments that could be materially different. We did not identify any triggering events that may have resulted in an impairment loss on our property and equipment in 2025. However, there can be no assurance that impairments of our property and equipment will not occur in future periods.

FCC Licenses. As of December 31, 2025, FCC licenses with an aggregate carrying amount of $154.7 million represented 52% of our total assets. We are required to test our FCC licenses for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that our FCC licenses might be impaired. We assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that our FCC licenses might be impaired. If we determine it is more likely than not that our FCC licenses are impaired, then we are required to perform a quantitative impairment test. In 2025, we elected to perform the quantitative impairment test for our FCC licenses in all markets. The quantitative impairment test, performed during the fourth quarter of 2025, compared the fair value of our FCC licenses with their carrying amounts. If the carrying amounts of the FCC licenses exceed their fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. For the purpose of testing our FCC licenses for impairment, we combine our FCC licenses into reporting units based on our market clusters.

The fair values of the FCC licenses in each of our market clusters were estimated using an income approach. The income approach is based upon discounted cash flow analyses for the next ten years incorporating variables such as projected audio market revenues, projected growth rate for audio market revenues, projected audio market revenue shares, projected audio station operating cash flow margins, and a discount rate appropriate for the audio industry.

We performed the annual quantitative impairment test for our FCC licenses in all markets during the fourth quarter of 2025. As a result of the quantitative impairment test, we recorded impairment losses of $224.8 million related to the FCC licenses in each of our reporting units. The impairment losses were primarily due to a decrease in the projected revenues in each market cluster, a decrease in operating cash flow margins in each market cluster, and an increase in the discount rate used in the discounted cash flow analyses to estimate the fair value of our FCC licenses.

The key assumptions used in the discounted cash flow analyses are as follows:

The carrying amount of our FCC licenses for each reporting unit and the percentage by which fair value exceeded the carrying amount are as follows:

We believe we have made reasonable estimates and assumptions to calculate the estimated fair value of our FCC licenses; however, these estimates and assumptions are highly judgmental in nature. Actual results can be materially different from estimates and assumptions. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by the industry or by us, or if events occur or circumstances change that would reduce the estimated fair value of our indefinite-lived intangible assets below the amounts reflected on our balance sheets, we may recognize future impairment charges, the amount of which may be material. If the discount rate was increased by 50 basis points without any additional changes to the other assumptions used in the discounted cash flow analyses, we would have recorded additional impairment losses of $8.4 million related to our FCC licenses. If the mature operating margins were decreased by 100 basis points without any additional changes to the other assumptions used in the discounted cash flow analyses, we would have recorded additional impairment losses of $10.5 million related to our FCC licenses.

Leases. We are required to determine whether a contract is or contains a lease at inception. Our analysis includes whether the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. This consideration involves judgment with respect to whether we have the right to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits from the use of the identified asset and whether we have the right to direct the use of the identified asset. We calculate the term for each lease agreement to include the noncancellable period specified in the agreement together with: (1) the periods covered by options to extend the lease if we are reasonably certain to exercise that option, (2) the periods covered by an option to terminate if we are reasonably certain not to exercise that option and (3) the period covered by an option to extend (or not terminate) if controlled by the lessor. The assessment of whether we are reasonably certain to exercise an option to extend a lease requires significant judgement surrounding contract-based factors, asset-based factors, entity-based factors and market-based factors. These factors are evaluated based on the facts and circumstances at the time we enter a lease agreement. The lease liabilities and the related right-of-use assets are calculated based on the present value of the lease payments using (1) the rate implicit in the lease or (2) the lessee’s incremental borrowing rate (“IBR”). IBR is defined as the rate of interest that a lessee would have to pay to borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar term an amount equal to the lease payments in a similar economic environment. See Note 10 to the accompanying financial statements.

Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan. The costs and liabilities of the Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan (“SERP”) are determined using actuarial valuations. An actuarial valuation involves making various assumptions that include the discount rate and mortality rates. The discount rate is based on matching the cash flows of the SERP to the FTSE Pension Discount Curve. The mortality assumptions are based on the mortality tables and mortality improvement scales which are selected based on the most recent study of the Society of Actuaries. The SERP is frozen so future employment does not change the benefit amounts. Actual results will differ from results which are estimated based on assumptions. See Note 11 to the accompanying financial statements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recent accounting pronouncements are described in Note 2 to the accompanying financial statements.

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2024

The following summary table presents a comparison of our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2025, with respect to certain of our key financial measures. The changes illustrated in the table are discussed in greater detail below. This section should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes to financial statements included in Item 8 of this report.

Results of Operations - Consolidated

Results of Operations - Segments

Net Revenue. Net revenue decreased $34.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. Audio revenue decreased $37.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily due to decreases in local direct revenue, local agency revenue and national agency revenue partially due to a decrease in political advertising. Digital revenue increased $2.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily due to continued growth in the digital segment.

Operating Expenses. Operating expenses decreased $15.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. Audio operating expenses decreased $11.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily due to continued expense management in the audio segment. Digital operating expenses decreased $3.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily due to continued expense management in the digital segment.

Corporate Expenses. Corporate expenses decreased $2.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily due to a decrease in compensation and contract expenses, partially offset by a decrease in corporate expenses allocated to operating expenses.

FCC Licenses Impairment Losses. As a result of our annual quantitative impairment test performed during the fourth quarter of 2025, we recorded impairment losses of $224.8 million related to the FCC licenses in each of our market clusters. The impairment losses were primarily due to a decrease in the projected revenues in each market cluster, a decrease in operating cash flow margins in each market cluster, and an increase in the discount rate used in the discounted cash flow analyses to estimate the fair value of the FCC licenses.

Other Operating Expenses. Other operating expenses consist primarily of increased royalties of $1.5 million to be paid under a
settlement agreement between the ASCAP and the Radio Music License Committee ("RMLC") for the period from 2022 to 2024 and increased royalties of $1.4 million to be paid under a settlement agreement between BMI and the RMLC for the period from 2022 to 2024.

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $8.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily due to amortization of a deferred interest premium recorded as a result of the debt restructure in October 2024.

Debt Issuance Expenses. In October 2024, we completed a debt restructuring, and as a result of the restructuring, we incurred $6.0 million in debt restructuring expenses, primarily consisting of legal fees, financial advisory services, and other professional expenses directly related to the debt restructure.

Gain on Sale of Investment. In March 2024, we received $6.0 million related to the sale of an investment in Broadcast Music, Inc. and recorded a gain of $6.0 million.

Gain on Repurchases of Long-Term Debt. In the second quarter of 2025, we repurchased $1.5 million principal amount of the Prior Notes for a price equal to 65% of the principal amount and recorded a gain of $0.5 million as a result of the repurchase.

Income Tax Benefit. Our effective tax rate was approximately 18% and 19% for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2025, respectively. These rates differ from the federal statutory rate of 21% due to the effect of state income taxes, certain non-taxable income, and certain expenses that are not deductible for tax purposes.

Net Loss. Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $196.5 million compared to a net loss of $5.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, as a result of the factors described above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview. Our primary sources of liquidity is internally generated cash flow and cash on hand. Our primary liquidity needs have been, and for the next 12 months and thereafter are expected to continue to be, for working capital, debt service, and other general corporate purposes, including capital expenditures and station acquisitions. In addition to property and equipment associated with station acquisitions, our capital expenditures have generally been, and are expected to continue to be, related to the maintenance of our office and studio space, the maintenance of our towers and equipment, and digital products and information technology. We have also purchased or constructed office and studio space in some of our markets to facilitate the consolidation of our operations.

Our Board has suspended future quarterly dividend payments until it is determined that resumption of dividend payments is in the best interest of the Company’s stockholders. In addition, as discussed in “Secured Notes” below, the Indenture governing our Notes limits our ability to pay dividends.

Existing Notes

As of December 31, 2025, we had outstanding $2.8 million aggregate principal amount of 8.625% senior notes due February 1, 2026 (the “Prior Notes”). Interest on the Prior Notes accrued at the rate of 8.625% per annum and was payable semiannually in arrears on February 1 and August 1 of each year. The Prior Notes were redeemed in full on January 31, 2026.

As of December 31, 2025, we had outstanding $30.9 million aggregate principal amount of 11.000% Senior Secured First Lien Notes due 2028 (the “Existing First Lien Notes”). Interest on the Existing First Lien Notes accrues at a rate of 11.000% per annum and is payable semi-annually in arrears on February 1 and August 1 of each year. The Existing First Lien Notes will mature on August 1, 2028. The Existing First Lien Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture, dated October 8, 2024, among Beasley Mezzanine Holdings, LLC, an indirect subsidiary of the Company (the “Issuer”), the guarantors party thereto and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee and collateral agent (as supplemented to date, the “Existing First Lien Notes Indenture”). The Existing First Lien Notes are fully and unconditionally secured by substantially all of the assets, other than certain excluded property, of the Issuer and the guarantors (the “Collateral”) on a senior secured first-priority lien basis, subject to certain exceptions, limitations and permitted liens. The Existing First Lien Notes Indenture contains restrictive covenants that limit the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, guarantee indebtedness or issue disqualified stock or, in the case of

such subsidiaries, preferred stock; pay dividends on, repurchase or make distributions in respect of our capital stock or make other restricted payments; make certain investments or acquisitions; sell, transfer or otherwise convey certain assets; create liens; enter into agreements restricting certain subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends or make other intercompany transfers; consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of its assets; enter into transactions with affiliates; prepay certain kinds of indebtedness; and issue or sell stock of its subsidiaries.

As of December 31, 2025, we had outstanding $184.9 million aggregate principal amount of 9.200% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2028 (the “Existing Second Lien Notes” and, together with the Existing First Lien Notes, the “Existing Notes”). Interest on the Existing Second Lien Notes accrues at a rate of 9.200 % per annum and is payable semi-annually in arrears on February 1 and August 1 of each year. The Existing Second Lien Notes will mature on August 1, 2028. The Existing Second Lien Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture, dated October 8, 2024, among the Issuer, the guarantors party thereto and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee and collateral agent (as supplemented to date, the “Existing Second Lien Notes Indenture”). The Existing Second Lien Notes are fully and unconditionally secured by the Collateral on a senior secured second-priority lien basis, subject to certain exceptions, limitations and permitted liens. The Existing Second Lien Notes Indenture contains restrictive covenants that limit the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, guarantee indebtedness or issue disqualified stock or, in the case of such subsidiaries, preferred stock; pay dividends on, repurchase or make distributions in respect of our capital stock or make other restricted payments; make certain investments or acquisitions; sell, transfer or otherwise convey certain assets; create liens; enter into agreements restricting certain subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends or make other intercompany transfers; consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of its assets; enter into transactions with affiliates; prepay certain kinds of indebtedness; and issue or sell stock of its subsidiaries.

As the aggregate undiscounted future principal and interest payments under the Existing Second Lien Notes and Existing First Lien Notes were greater than the net carrying amount of the Prior Notes at the time of the debt restructuring, the carrying amount of the debt was not adjusted, and a new effective interest rate was calculated as the discount rate that equates the present value of the future cash payments specified by the new terms with the carrying amount of the debt. The carrying amount of the debt was reduced by the fair value of the shares of our Class A Common Stock issued to holders of the Prior Notes who participated in the Prior Exchange Offer (as defined in Note 9 below) of $2.2 million. The Company capitalized $2.6 million in fees paid to the lenders in connection with the debt restructuring, consisting of certain cash payments made to holders of Prior Notes who participated in the Prior Exchange Offer (as defined in Note 9 below) and a 3.0% participation premium paid to the holders of Prior Notes who participated in the First Lien Notes Offer (as defined in Note 9 below). The Company incurred $6.0 million in debt restructuring costs, primarily consisting of legal fees, financial advisory services, and other professional expenses directly related to the debt restructuring, which were expensed.

From time to time, we repurchase sufficient shares of our Class A Common Stock to fund withholding taxes in connection with the vesting of restricted stock units. We paid approximately $30,000 to repurchase 5,561 shares during the year ended December 31, 2025. From time to time, we may seek to repurchase, redeem or otherwise retire our existing indebtedness through cash purchases and/or exchanges for equity securities, in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, tender offers or otherwise. Such repurchases, redemptions or other transactions, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions, and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.

Events After Period End

On March 20, 2026, we and the Issuer entered into a transaction support agreement (the “Transaction Support Agreement”) with certain holders of the Existing Notes (the “Supporting Holders”) representing a majority of the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Existing First Lien Notes and a majority of the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Existing Second Lien Notes. The Transaction Support Agreement provides for support of certain refinancing transactions (the “Refinancing Transactions”), to be undertaken by the following: (i) an exchange offer (the “Exchange Offer”) to exchange any and all of the Existing Second Lien Notes for newly issued 10.000% Senior Secured Second Lien PIK Notes due 2027 ("2027 PIK Notes") at an exchange ratio of 50.0% of the aggregate principal amount (or $500 per $1,000 of principal amount) of the Existing Second Lien Notes tendered for exchange, to be issued subsequent to the issuance of this Annual Report, (ii) an offer to purchase (the “Tender Offer” and, together with the Exchange Offer, the “Offers”) up to $15.9 million of the Existing First Lien Notes for purchase at a price equal to 100% of the par value thereof and (iii) related consent solicitations (the “Consent Solicitations”) to proposed amendments to the existing indentures governing the Existing Notes (the “Existing Indentures”) to, among other things, (x) adopt certain proposed amendments to the Existing Indentures and (y) release all of the Collateral securing the Existing Second Lien Notes. The Refinancing Transactions are expected to be consummated on the terms set forth in an offering memorandum and solicitation statement provided to holders of the Existing Notes.

Pursuant to the Transaction Support Agreement, the Supporting Holders have agreed to, among other things, (i) tender all of their Existing Notes in the Offers and (ii) provide their related consents under the Consent Solicitations. The Supporting Holders’ obligations under the Transaction Support Agreement are conditioned upon holders holding 100% of the aggregate principal amount of the Existing Second Lien Notes tendering their Existing Second Lien Notes pursuant to the Exchange Offer and providing their

consents to the Consent Solicitations (the “Minimum Participation Condition”), as well as certain other customary conditions. The Initial Supporting Holders (as defined in the Transaction Support Agreement) may waive the Minimum Participation Condition in their sole and absolute discretion.. Satisfaction of the Minimum Participation Condition may not be known until the expiration date of the Exchange Offer, which is currently expected to be on April 16, 2026.

In connection with the Company’s and the Issuer’s entry into the Transaction Support Agreement, on March 20, 2026, the Issuer commenced the Refinancing Transactions. On March 26, 2026, the early first lien tender date, holders of the Existing First Lien Notes had validly tendered $30.9 million aggregate principal amount of Existing First Lien Notes in the Tender Offer, and the Issuer accordingly accepted $15.9 million of such tenders in accordance with the terms of the Tender Offer. On March 30, 2026, the Company completed the purchase of $15.9 million aggregate principal amount of Existing First Lien Notes pursuant to the Tender Offer, and $15.0 million aggregate principal amount of Existing First Lien Notes remain outstanding as of such date. As of the date of this filing, approximately 97% of the aggregate principal amount of the Existing Second Lien Notes have validly tendered in the Exchange Offer and provided consents to the proposed amendments to the Existing Second Lien Notes Indenture. Assuming the requisite conditions for consummation of the Refinancing Transactions are satisfied, the Company expects the Refinancing Transactions to settle on or around April 20, 2026.

The Transaction Support Agreement includes representations, warranties, covenants and closing conditions customary for agreements of this type. Pursuant to the terms of the Transaction Support Agreement, at the closing of the Offers, the Company will appoint an independent director selected by the Initial Supporting Holders as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. The Transaction Support Agreement also grants the Initial Supporting Holders the right, commencing 270 days after closing of the Offers, to propose three candidates for an additional independent director to be selected and appointed by the Company, and to participate in the formation of a strategic alternatives committee of the Board of Directors, in each case subject to certain terms and conditions contained in the Transaction Support Agreement. In addition, the Transaction Support Agreement provides that certain actions, including any insolvency proceeding or bankruptcy filing of the Company, must be authorized by the independent director appointed pursuant to the Transaction Support Agreement. The Transaction Support Agreement will, among other circumstances, terminate upon the earlier of: (a) mutual written consent of the Company and the Supporting Holders, (b) on the settlement date of the Offers or (c) on May 15, 2026, if the Refinancing Transactions have not yet been consummated.

The 2027 PIK Notes will mature on December 31, 2027, subject to a springing maturity condition. Pursuant to the springing maturity condition, if (i) on or before September 30, 2027 the Company and its subsidiaries have not entered into one or more binding agreements for asset sales or debt or equity financings that the Company reasonably determines would yield proceeds, once consummated, that would be sufficient to redeem all of the 2027 PIK Notes and any Existing First Lien Notes outstanding as of September 30, 2027, the remaining Existing First Lien Notes and the 2027 PIK Notes will mature on such date or (ii) an event of default with respect to a breach of the governance covenants set forth in the Transaction Support Agreement has occurred, the 2027 PIK Notes will mature on the date such event of default occurred.

The indenture governing the 2027 PIK Notes will include an equity conversion feature. Holders of at least a majority in aggregate principal amount of the 2027 PIK Notes then outstanding may elect to convert all outstanding 2027 PIK Notes into shares of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock on or after December 31, 2027 (or, if the springing maturity condition has occurred, the date on which the springing maturity condition occurs). If such election is made, the holders would receive shares representing, in the aggregate, up to 95% of the issued and outstanding Class A common Stock and Class B common Stock, on a fully diluted basis, subject to reduction based on the amount of cash payments made to holders in respect of principal of the 2027 PIK Notes prior to the conversion date. The equity FCC and compliance with applicable FCC foreign ownership rules.

Pursuant to the Transaction Support Agreement and the Refinancing Transactions, the Company expects to enter into an asset-based credit facility (the “ABL Credit Facility”) pursuant to a credit agreement (the “ABL Credit Agreement”) with a principal amount of up to $35.0 million. The ABL Credit Agreement is expected to permit the borrowers thereunder to request increases in the revolving commitments under the ABL Credit Facility from time to time, subject to a cap and customary conditions. Borrowings under the ABL Credit Facility are expected to bear interest, at the borrowers’ option, at term SOFR or base rate, plus, in each case, an interest rate spread to be agreed. The ABL Credit Facility is expected to mature three years from the closing date thereof. The ABL Credit Facility is expected to be secured by a first-priority lien on accounts receivable and related assets of the Issuer and certain of its subsidiaries and a third-priority lien on certain other assets of the Issuer and certain of its subsidiaries. The obligations of the borrowers under the ABL Credit Agreement are expected to be guaranteed by the guarantors of the Existing Notes. The ABL Credit Agreement is expected to include, among other things, certain customary conditions precedent that must be satisfied prior to any borrowing, customary affirmative and negative covenants and customary events of default. The ABL Credit Agreement is expected to provide that, upon the occurrence and during the continuance of an event of default, the revolving commitments may be terminated, and all outstanding obligations under the ABL Credit Facility may be declared immediately due and payable. There are no assurances that the ABL Credit Agreement will be entered into on the terms set forth above or at all.

In addition to the Refinancing Transactions, we may provide for future liquidity needs through one or a combination of the following sources of liquidity:

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2025.

Cash Flows. The following summary table presents a comparison of our cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2025 with respect to certain of our key measures affecting our liquidity. The changes set forth in the table are discussed in greater detail below. This section should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes to financial statements included in Item 8 of this report.

Net Cash Used In Operating Activities. Net cash used in operating activities was $8.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to net cash used in operating activities of $3.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2024. Significant factors affecting the $4.8 million increase in net cash used in operating activities included a $32.3 million decrease in cash receipts from revenue and a $1.0 million increase in income tax payments, partially offset by a $17.2 million decrease in cash paid for operating expenses, a $10.3 million decrease in interest payments, and a $2.2 million decrease in cash paid for corporate expenses.

Net Cash Provided By Investing Activities. Net cash provided by investing activities was $5.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $4.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2024. Net cash provided by investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2025 included proceeds of $10.5 million from a station disposition and a land disposition, partially offset by $4.8 million for capital expenditures. Net cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2024 included proceeds of $6.0 million from the sale of an investment, and proceeds of $1.3 million from property and equipment dispositions, partially offset by $3.0 million for capital expenditures.

Net Cash Used In Financing Activities. Net cash used in financing activities was $1.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to net cash used in financing activities of $13.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2024. Net cash used in financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2025 included Existing Notes repurchases of $1.0 million. Net cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2024 included Existing Notes repurchases of $42.5 million and payment of debt issuance expenses of $1.7 million, partially offset by debt issuance of $30.0 million and common stock issuance of $0.7 million.

Related Party Transactions

Beasley Broadcasting Management, LLC

We lease our principal executive offices in Naples, FL from Beasley Broadcasting Management, LLC, which is held by a trust for the benefit of Caroline Beasley, Bruce G. Beasley, Brian E. Beasley, and other members of the Beasley family. The lease agreement expires on December 31, 2031. Rental expense was $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2025.

Beasley Family Properties, LLC

We lease office space for our stations in Fort Myers, FL from Beasley Family Properties, LLC, which is held by a trust for the benefit of Caroline Beasley, Bruce G. Beasley, Brian E. Beasley, and other members of the Beasley family. The lease agreement was terminated on February 6, 2026. For more information, see Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements. Rental expense was $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2025.

Beasley Family Towers, LLC

We lease office space for our stations in Fayetteville, NC from BFT. The lease agreement expires on August 31, 2030. Rental expense was $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2025.

GGB Augusta, LLC

We lease land for our stations in Augusta, GA from GGB Augusta, LLC, which is held by a trust for the benefit of Caroline Beasley, Bruce G. Beasley, Brian E. Beasley, and other members of the Beasley family. The lease agreement expires on October 31, 2028. Rental expense was approximately $41,000 for the year ended December 31, 2025.

GGB Las Vegas, LLC

We leased office space for our stations in Las Vegas, NV from GGB Las Vegas, LLC, which is controlled by members of the Beasley family. The lease agreement was terminated on June 30, 2025. Rental expense was $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2025.

Wintersrun Communications, LLC

We leased a tower for one station in Augusta, GA from Wintersrun. The lease agreement expired on October 15, 2025. Rental expense was approximately $24,000 for the year ended December 31, 2025.

Quu, Inc.

We currently hold an investment in Quu, Inc. ("Quu"), a company that provides us with access to an application for digital revenue. Payments to Quu for access to the application were $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2025.

Loan to Interactive Life, Inc.

In May 2022, we provided a $250,000 loan to Interactive Life, Inc. that accrues interest at 8.625% per annum until the loan’s maturity in March 2026. Interactive Life, Inc. is controlled by Mr. Joseph Harb. We currently hold an investment in Quu, Inc., a company that is controlled by Mr. Harb. Repayment of the loan to Interactive Life, Inc. is guaranteed by Mr. Harb with 3,333,334 shares of Class A common stock of Quu, Inc.

Inflation

For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2025, inflation has affected our performance in terms of higher costs for operating expenses; however, the exact impact cannot be reasonably determined.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS

Not required for smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

BEASLEY BROADCAST GROUP, INC.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc.

Naples, Florida

Explanatory Paragraph – Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has a history of net losses and negative operating cash flows, expects to continue to incur additional losses in the near future and is currently in default on a portion of its debt that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex

judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

FCC Licenses Impairment Assessment – Radio Reporting Units

As disclosed in Note 5 to the financial statements, the Company’s consolidated FCC licenses balance was $154.7 million as of December 31, 2025. The Company performed the annual quantitative impairment test for its FCC licenses in all markets during the fourth quarter of 2025 and recorded impairment losses of $224.8 million related to the FCC licenses in each of its reporting units during the year ended December 31, 2025. Management performs an annual impairment test during the fourth quarter of each year, or more frequently when it is determined that events and circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that FCC licenses are impaired, which includes a qualitative assessment. FCC licenses are assessed for impairment at the market cluster level. Potential impairment is identified by comparing the fair value of a market’s FCC licenses to its carrying value. Fair value is estimated by management using an income approach. Management’s cash flow projections for its FCC licenses included significant judgments and assumptions relating to revenue growth rates, the market share at maturity, operating cash flow margins at maturity of an average station within a market based upon market size and station type, and the discount rate.

We considered auditing the impairment of FCC licenses to be a critical audit matter because it involved a high degree of subjectivity in evaluating management’s estimates, judgments, and assumptions, as well as significant audit effort due to complexity in the aggregation and evaluation of significant amounts of data and the use of valuation specialists.

Our audit procedures related to impairment of FCC licenses included the following:

/s/ Crowe LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2006.

Los Angeles, California

April 8, 2026

BEASLEY BROADCAST GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS