Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
☒QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017
OR
☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number 001-34436
Starwood Property Trust, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland
27-0247747
(State or Other Jurisdiction ofIncorporation or Organization)
(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)
591 West Putnam Avenue
Greenwich, Connecticut
06830
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(203) 422-7700
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer ☒
Accelerated filer ☐
Non-accelerated filer ☐
Smaller reporting company ☐
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Emerging growth company ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
The number of shares of the issuer’s common stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding as of August 3, 2017 was 260,558,434.
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements, including without limitation, statements concerning our operations, economic performance and financial condition. These forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are developed by combining currently available information with our beliefs and assumptions and are generally identified by the words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate” and other similar expressions. Forward-looking statements do not guarantee future performance, which may be materially different from that expressed in, or implied by, any such statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their respective dates.
These forward-looking statements are based largely on our current beliefs, assumptions and expectations of our future performance taking into account all information currently available to us. These beliefs, assumptions and expectations can change as a result of many possible events or factors, not all of which are known to us or within our control, and which could materially affect actual results, performance or achievements. Factors that may cause actual results to vary from our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
·
factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 and this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including those set forth under the captions “Risk Factors” and “Business”;
defaults by borrowers in paying debt service on outstanding indebtedness;
impairment in the value of real estate property securing our loans or in which we invest;
availability of mortgage origination and acquisition opportunities acceptable to us;
potential mismatches in the timing of asset repayments and the maturity of the associated financing agreements;
national and local economic and business conditions;
general and local commercial and residential real estate property conditions;
changes in federal government policies;
changes in federal, state and local governmental laws and regulations;
increased competition from entities engaged in mortgage lending and securities investing activities;
changes in interest rates; and
the availability of, and costs associated with, sources of liquidity.
In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurances that the results referred to in the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q will in fact occur. Except to the extent required by applicable law or regulation, we undertake no obligation to, and expressly disclaim any such obligation to, update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events, changes to future results over time or otherwise.
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part I
Financial Information
Item 1.
Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 Business and Organization
Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Note 3 Acquisitions and Dispositions
Note 4 Loans
Note 5 Investment Securities
Note 6 Properties
Note 7 Investment in Unconsolidated Entities
Note 8 Goodwill and Intangibles
Note 9 Secured Financing Agreements
Note 10 Unsecured Senior Notes
Note 11 Loan Securitization/Sale Activities
Note 12 Derivatives and Hedging Activity
Note 13 Offsetting Assets and Liabilities
Note 14 Variable Interest Entities
Note 15 Related-Party Transactions
Note 16 Stockholders’ Equity
Note 17 Earnings per Share
Note 18 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Note 19 Fair Value
Note 20 Income Taxes
Note 21 Commitments and Contingencies
Note 22 Segment Data
Note 23 Subsequent Events
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
Part II
Other Information
Legal Proceedings
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Mine Safety Disclosures
Item 5.
Item 6.
Exhibits
3
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Starwood Property Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share data)
As of
June 30, 2017
December 31, 2016
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
261,894
615,522
Restricted cash
43,299
35,233
Loans held-for-investment, net
6,211,075
5,847,995
Loans held-for-sale, at fair value
610,116
63,279
Loans transferred as secured borrowings
—
35,000
Investment securities ($283,132 and $297,638 held at fair value)
748,934
807,618
Properties, net
1,960,498
1,944,720
Intangible assets ($38,648 and $55,082 held at fair value)
191,366
219,248
Investment in unconsolidated entities
229,539
204,605
Goodwill
140,437
Derivative assets
46,078
89,361
Accrued interest receivable
33,346
28,224
Other assets
163,648
101,763
Variable interest entity (“VIE”) assets, at fair value
53,902,715
67,123,261
Total Assets
64,542,945
77,256,266
Liabilities and Equity
Liabilities:
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
171,449
198,134
Related-party payable
22,778
37,818
Dividends payable
126,171
125,075
Derivative liabilities
8,051
3,904
Secured financing agreements, net
4,750,923
4,154,126
Unsecured senior notes, net
2,039,086
2,011,544
Secured borrowings on transferred loans
VIE liabilities, at fair value
52,864,038
66,130,592
Total Liabilities
59,982,496
72,696,193
Commitments and contingencies (Note 21)
Equity:
Starwood Property Trust, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 per share, 100,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding
Common stock, $0.01 per share, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 265,161,169 issued and 260,554,284 outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and 263,893,806 issued and 259,286,921 outstanding as of December 31, 2016
2,652
2,639
Additional paid-in capital
4,697,497
4,691,180
Treasury stock (4,606,885 shares)
(92,104)
Accumulated other comprehensive income
55,981
36,138
Accumulated deficit
(146,863)
(115,579)
Total Starwood Property Trust, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity
4,517,163
4,522,274
Non-controlling interests in consolidated subsidiaries
43,286
37,799
Total Equity
4,560,449
4,560,073
Total Liabilities and Equity
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except per share data)
For the Three Months Ended
For the Six Months Ended
June 30,
2017
2016
Revenues:
Interest income from loans
120,612
122,557
232,495
240,089
Interest income from investment securities
12,370
15,301
27,594
34,704
Servicing fees
18,628
23,312
32,730
48,003
Rental income
58,966
37,843
116,008
70,520
Other revenues
993
979
1,462
2,169
Total revenues
211,569
199,992
410,289
395,485
Costs and expenses:
Management fees
24,633
23,767
49,017
48,730
Interest expense
71,317
57,635
137,177
114,155
General and administrative
32,520
35,409
62,949
68,207
Acquisition and investment pursuit costs
537
2,888
1,208
4,173
Costs of rental operations
23,024
15,852
43,902
28,507
Depreciation and amortization
22,032
19,073
44,260
37,833
Loan loss allowance, net
(2,694)
2,029
(2,999)
1,268
Other expense
142
900
100
Total costs and expenses
171,511
156,653
336,414
302,973
Income before other income (loss), income taxes and non-controlling interests
40,058
43,339
73,875
92,512
Other income (loss):
Change in net assets related to consolidated VIEs
77,761
50,707
146,931
46,540
Change in fair value of servicing rights
(8,001)
(12,191)
(16,434)
(18,930)
Change in fair value of investment securities, net
(2,493)
1,319
(3,664)
2,072
Change in fair value of mortgage loans held-for-sale, net
15,406
13,235
25,999
20,126
Earnings from unconsolidated entities
29,465
4,479
32,452
8,544
Gain (loss) on sale of investments and other assets, net
5,183
(90)
5,127
155
(Loss) gain on derivative financial instruments, net
(37,586)
20,253
(41,935)
(4,465)
Foreign currency gain (loss), net
12,910
(16,988)
17,774
(17,366)
Total other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”)
(109)
(54)
Noncredit portion of OTTI recognized in other comprehensive income
54
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings
Loss on extinguishment of debt
(5,916)
Other income, net
91
8,714
456
10,729
Total other income (loss)
92,627
69,438
160,681
47,405
Income before income taxes
132,685
112,777
234,556
139,917
Income tax provision
(9,452)
(706)
(8,469)
(800)
Net income
123,233
112,071
226,087
139,117
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests
(5,853)
(598)
(6,349)
(987)
Net income attributable to Starwood Property Trust, Inc.
117,380
111,473
219,738
138,130
Earnings per share data attributable to Starwood Property Trust, Inc.:
Basic
Diluted
Dividends declared per common share
5
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands)
Other comprehensive income (loss) (net change by component):
Cash flow hedges
(48)
78
(321)
Available-for-sale securities
4,907
5,951
6,753
2,551
Foreign currency translation
11,005
(6,733)
13,012
668
Other comprehensive income (loss)
15,914
(830)
19,843
2,898
Comprehensive income
139,147
111,241
245,930
142,015
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests
Comprehensive income attributable to Starwood Property Trust, Inc.
133,294
110,643
239,581
141,028
6
Total
Starwood
Accumulated
Property
Common stock
Additional
Other
Trust, Inc.
Non-
Par
Paid-in
Treasury Stock
Comprehensive
Stockholders’
Controlling
Shares
Value
Capital
Amount
Deficit
Income
Equity
Interests
Balance, January 1, 2017
263,893,806
4,606,885
Proceeds from DRIP Plan
16,407
369
Equity offering costs
(12)
Equity component of 2023 Convertible Senior Notes issuance
3,755
Equity component of 2018 Convertible Senior Notes repurchase
(18,105)
Share-based compensation
709,462
7
8,072
8,079
Manager incentive fee paid in stock
541,494
12,238
12,244
6,349
Dividends declared, $0.96 per share
(251,022)
Other comprehensive income, net
VIE non-controlling interests
2,737
Distributions to non-controlling interests
(3,599)
Balance, June 30, 2017
265,161,169
Balance, January 1, 2016
241,044,775
2,410
4,192,844
3,553,996
(72,381)
(12,286)
29,729
4,140,316
30,627
4,170,943
9,163
177
Common stock repurchased
1,052,889
(19,723)
876,674
9
14,651
14,660
723,249
8
13,215
13,223
987
(229,217)
(52)
Contributions from non-controlling interests
10,417
(2,350)
Balance, June 30, 2016
242,653,861
2,427
4,220,887
(103,373)
32,627
4,060,464
39,629
4,100,093
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
Amortization of deferred financing costs, premiums and discounts on secured financing agreements
9,324
8,212
Amortization of discounts and deferred financing costs on senior notes
11,777
10,628
Accretion of net discount on investment securities
(8,007)
(7,349)
Accretion of net deferred loan fees and discounts
(16,194)
(23,362)
Share-based component of incentive fees
Change in fair value of fair value option investment securities
3,664
(2,072)
Change in fair value of consolidated VIEs
(42,593)
45,899
16,434
18,930
Change in fair value of loans held-for-sale
(25,999)
(20,126)
Change in fair value of derivatives
39,223
2,332
Foreign currency (gain) loss, net
(17,590)
17,169
Gain on sale of investments and other assets
(5,127)
(155)
Impairment charges
867
42,701
34,664
(32,452)
(8,544)
Distributions of earnings from unconsolidated entities
4,284
9,817
Bargain purchase gain
(8,406)
5,916
Origination and purchase of loans held-for-sale, net of principal collections
(991,343)
(488,448)
Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale
470,478
475,333
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Related-party payable, net
(15,040)
(20,749)
Accrued and capitalized interest receivable, less purchased interest
(39,143)
(41,151)
(2,391)
6,715
2,763
(29,055)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
(345,037)
148,550
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Origination and purchase of loans held-for-investment
(1,228,952)
(997,421)
Proceeds from principal collections on loans
869,297
1,193,643
Proceeds from loans sold
37,079
121,276
Purchase of investment securities
(7,433)
(350,642)
Proceeds from sales of investment securities
11,134
1,269
Proceeds from principal collections on investment securities
86,259
47,544
Real estate business combinations, net of cash acquired
(91,186)
Proceeds from sale of properties
18,256
Additions to properties and other assets
(25,503)
(5,521)
(3,854)
Distribution of capital from unconsolidated entities
3,235
1,244
Payments for purchase or termination of derivatives
(39,755)
(15,144)
Proceeds from termination of derivatives
22,981
27,447
Return of investment basis in purchased derivative asset
121
137
Net cash used in investing activities
(253,281)
(71,208)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Proceeds from borrowings
2,134,245
2,059,599
Principal repayments on and repurchases of borrowings
(1,590,421)
(1,711,117)
Payment of deferred financing costs
(8,211)
(6,437)
Proceeds from common stock issuances
Payment of equity offering costs
(647)
Payment of dividends
(249,925)
(229,151)
Purchase of treasury stock
Issuance of debt of consolidated VIEs
10,188
596
Repayment of debt of consolidated VIEs
(79,099)
(147,523)
Distributions of cash from consolidated VIEs
38,840
22,986
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
251,740
(22,526)
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
(346,578)
54,816
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period
650,755
391,884
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
1,016
(749)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period
305,193
445,951
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest
113,564
91,961
Income taxes paid
3,362
2,177
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Dividends declared, but not yet paid
125,587
115,013
Consolidation of VIEs (VIE asset/liability additions)
1,127,952
16,850,221
Deconsolidation of VIEs (VIE asset/liability reductions)
2,108,589
5,126,980
Net assets acquired from consolidated VIEs
19,652
102,976
Settlement of loans transferred as secured borrowings
Fair value of assets acquired, net of cash
270,021
Fair value of liabilities assumed
170,429
As of June 30, 2017
(Unaudited)
1. Business and Organization
Starwood Property Trust, Inc. (“STWD” and, together with its subsidiaries, “we” or the “Company”) is a Maryland corporation that commenced operations in August 2009, upon the completion of our initial public offering. We are focused primarily on originating, acquiring, financing and managing commercial mortgage loans and other commercial real estate debt investments, commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”), and other commercial real estate investments in both the U.S. and Europe. We refer to the following as our target assets: commercial real estate mortgage loans, preferred equity interests, CMBS and other commercial real estate-related debt investments. Our target assets may also include residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”), certain residential mortgage loans, distressed or non-performing commercial loans, commercial properties subject to net leases and equity interests in commercial real estate. As market conditions change over time, we may adjust our strategy to take advantage of changes in interest rates and credit spreads as well as economic and credit conditions.
We have three reportable business segments as of June 30, 2017:
Real estate lending (the “Lending Segment”)—engages primarily in originating, acquiring, financing and managing commercial first mortgages, subordinated mortgages, mezzanine loans, preferred equity, CMBS, RMBS, certain residential mortgage loans, and other real estate and real estate-related debt investments in both the U.S. and Europe.
Real estate investing and servicing (the “Investing and Servicing Segment”)—includes (i) a servicing business in the U.S. that manages and works out problem assets, (ii) an investment business that selectively acquires and manages unrated, investment grade and non-investment grade rated CMBS, including subordinated interests of securitization and resecuritization transactions, (iii) a mortgage loan business which originates conduit loans for the primary purpose of selling these loans into securitization transactions, and (iv) an investment business that selectively acquires commercial real estate assets, including properties acquired from CMBS trusts. This segment excludes the consolidation of securitization variable interest entities (“VIEs”).
Real estate property (the “Property Segment”)—engages primarily in acquiring and managing equity interests in stabilized commercial real estate properties, including multi-family properties, that are held for investment.
We are organized and conduct our operations to qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). As such, we will generally not be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on that portion of our net income that is distributed to stockholders if we distribute at least 90% of our taxable income to our stockholders by prescribed dates and comply with various other requirements.
We are organized as a holding company and conduct our business primarily through our various wholly-owned subsidiaries. We are externally managed and advised by SPT Management, LLC (our “Manager”) pursuant to the terms of a management agreement. Our Manager is controlled by Barry Sternlicht, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Our Manager is an affiliate of Starwood Capital Group, a privately-held private equity firm founded and controlled by Mr. Sternlicht.
10
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Balance Sheet Presentation of the Investing and Servicing Segment’s Variable Interest Entities
As noted above, the Investing and Servicing Segment operates an investment business that acquires unrated, investment grade and non-investment grade rated CMBS. These securities represent interests in securitization structures (commonly referred to as special purpose entities, or “SPEs”). These SPEs are structured as pass through entities that receive principal and interest on the underlying collateral and distribute those payments to the certificate holders. Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), SPEs typically qualify as VIEs. These are entities that, by design, either (1) lack sufficient equity to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties, or (2) have equity investors that do not have the ability to make significant decisions relating to the entity’s operations through voting rights, or do not have the obligation to absorb the expected losses, or do not have the right to receive the residual returns of the entity.
Because the Investing and Servicing Segment often serves as the special servicer of the trusts in which it invests, consolidation of these structures is required pursuant to GAAP as outlined in detail below. This results in a consolidated balance sheet which presents the gross assets and liabilities of the VIEs. The assets and other instruments held by these VIEs are restricted and can only be used to fulfill the obligations of the entity. Additionally, the obligations of the VIEs do not have any recourse to the general credit of any other consolidated entities, nor to us as the consolidator of these VIEs.
The VIE liabilities initially represent investment securities on our balance sheet (pre-consolidation). Upon consolidation of these VIEs, our associated investment securities are eliminated, as is the interest income related to those securities. Similarly, the fees we earn in our roles as special servicer of the bonds issued by the consolidated VIEs or as collateral administrator of the consolidated VIEs are also eliminated. Finally, an allocable portion of the identified servicing intangible associated with the eliminated fee streams is eliminated in consolidation.
Refer to the segment data in Note 22 for a presentation of the Investing and Servicing Segment without consolidation of these VIEs.
Basis of Accounting and Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include our accounts and those of our consolidated subsidiaries and VIEs. Intercompany amounts have been eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows have been included.
These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Form 10-K”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.
Refer to our Form 10-K for a description of our recurring accounting policies. We have included disclosure in this Note 2 regarding principles of consolidation and other accounting policies that (i) are required to be disclosed quarterly, (ii) we view as critical, or (iii) became significant since December 31, 2016 due to a corporate action or increase in the significance of the underlying business activity.
Variable Interest Entities
In addition to the Investing and Servicing Segment’s VIEs, certain other entities in which we hold interests are considered VIEs as the limited partners of these entities do not collectively possess (i) the right to remove the general partner without cause or (ii) the right to participate in significant decisions made by the partnership.
11
We evaluate all of our interests in VIEs for consolidation. When our interests are determined to be variable interests, we assess whether we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is required to consolidate the VIE. Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810, Consolidation, defines the primary beneficiary as the party that has both (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact its economic performance, and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses and the right to receive benefits from the VIE which could be potentially significant. We consider our variable interests as well as any variable interests of our related parties in making this determination. Where both of these factors are present, we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary and we consolidate the VIE. Where either one of these factors is not present, we are not the primary beneficiary and do not consolidate the VIE.
To assess whether we have the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, we consider all facts and circumstances, including our role in establishing the VIE and our ongoing rights and responsibilities. This assessment includes, (i) identifying the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance; and (ii) identifying which party, if any, has power over those activities. In general, the parties that make the most significant decisions affecting the VIE or have the right to unilaterally remove those decision makers are deemed to have the power to direct the activities of a VIE. The right to remove the decision maker in a VIE must be exercisable without cause for the decision maker to not be deemed the party that has the power to direct the activities of a VIE.
To assess whether we have the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE, we consider all of our economic interests, including debt and equity investments, servicing fees, and other arrangements deemed to be variable interests in the VIE. This assessment requires that we apply judgment in determining whether these interests, in the aggregate, are considered potentially significant to the VIE. Factors considered in assessing significance include: the design of the VIE, including its capitalization structure; subordination of interests; payment priority; relative share of interests held across various classes within the VIE’s capital structure; and the reasons why the interests are held by us.
Our purchased investment securities include CMBS which are unrated and non-investment grade rated securities issued by CMBS trusts. In certain cases, we may contract to provide special servicing activities for these CMBS trusts, or, as holder of the controlling class, we may have the right to name and remove the special servicer for these trusts. In our role as special servicer, we provide services on defaulted loans within the trusts, such as foreclosure or work-out procedures, as permitted by the underlying contractual agreements. In exchange for these services, we receive a fee. These rights give us the ability to direct activities that could significantly impact the trust’s economic performance. However, in those instances where an unrelated third party has the right to unilaterally remove us as special servicer without cause, we do not have the power to direct activities that most significantly impact the trust’s economic performance. We evaluated all of our positions in such investments for consolidation.
For securitization VIEs in which we are determined to be the primary beneficiary, all of the underlying assets, liabilities and equity of the structures are recorded on our books, and the initial investment, along with any associated unrealized holding gains and losses, are eliminated in consolidation. Similarly, the interest income earned from these structures, as well as the fees paid by these trusts to us in our capacity as special servicer, are eliminated in consolidation. Further, an allocable portion of the identified servicing intangible asset associated with the servicing fee streams, and the corresponding allocable amortization or change in fair value of the servicing intangible asset, are also eliminated in consolidation.
We perform ongoing reassessments of: (i) whether any entities previously evaluated under the majority voting interest framework have become VIEs, based on certain events, and therefore subject to the VIE consolidation framework, and (ii) whether changes in the facts and circumstances regarding our involvement with a VIE causes our consolidation conclusion regarding the VIE to change.
We elect the fair value option for initial and subsequent recognition of the assets and liabilities of our consolidated securitization VIEs. Interest income and interest expense associated with these VIEs are no longer relevant on a standalone basis because these amounts are already reflected in the fair value changes. We have elected to present these items in a single line on our condensed consolidated statements of operations. The residual difference shown on
12
our condensed consolidated statements of operations in the line item “Change in net assets related to consolidated VIEs” represents our beneficial interest in the VIEs.
We separately present the assets and liabilities of our consolidated securitization VIEs as individual line items on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. The liabilities of our consolidated securitization VIEs consist solely of obligations to the bondholders of the related CMBS trusts, and are thus presented as a single line item entitled “VIE liabilities.” The assets of our consolidated securitization VIEs consist principally of loans, but at times, also include foreclosed loans which have been temporarily converted into real estate owned (“REO”). These assets in the aggregate are likewise presented as a single line item entitled “VIE assets.”
Loans comprise the vast majority of our securitization VIE assets and are carried at fair value due to the election of the fair value option. When an asset becomes REO, it is due to nonperformance of the loan. Because the loan is already at fair value, the carrying value of an REO asset is also initially at fair value. Furthermore, when we consolidate a CMBS trust, any existing REO would be consolidated at fair value. Once an asset becomes REO, its disposition time is relatively short. As a result, the carrying value of an REO generally approximates fair value under GAAP.
In addition to sharing a similar measurement method as the loans in a CMBS trust, the securitization VIE assets as a whole can only be used to settle the obligations of the consolidated VIE. The assets of our securitization VIEs are not individually accessible by the bondholders, which creates inherent limitations from a valuation perspective. Also creating limitations from a valuation perspective is our role as special servicer, which provides us very limited visibility, if any, into the performing loans of a CMBS trust.
REO assets generally represent a very small percentage of the overall asset pool of a CMBS trust. In a new issue CMBS trust there are no REO assets. We estimate that REO assets constitute approximately 4% of our consolidated securitization VIE assets, with the remaining 96% representing loans. However, it is important to note that the fair value of our securitization VIE assets is determined by reference to our securitization VIE liabilities as permitted under Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-13, Consolidation (Topic 810): Measuring the Financial Assets and the Financial Liabilities of a Consolidated Collateralized Financing Entity. In other words, our VIE liabilities are more reliably measurable than the VIE assets, resulting in our current measurement methodology which utilizes this value to determine the fair value of our securitization VIE assets as a whole. As a result, these percentages are not necessarily indicative of the relative fair values of each of these asset categories if the assets were to be valued individually.
Due to our accounting policy election under ASU 2014-13, separately presenting two different asset categories would result in an arbitrary assignment of value to each, with one asset category representing a residual amount, as opposed to its fair value. However, as a pool, the fair value of the assets in total is equal to the fair value of the liabilities.
For these reasons, the assets of our securitization VIEs are presented in the aggregate.
Fair Value Option
The guidance in ASC 825, Financial Instruments, provides a fair value option election that allows entities to make an irrevocable election of fair value as the initial and subsequent measurement attribute for certain eligible financial assets and liabilities. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. The decision to elect the fair value option is determined on an instrument by instrument basis and must be applied to an entire instrument and is irrevocable once elected. Assets and liabilities measured at fair value pursuant to this guidance are required to be reported separately in our consolidated balance sheets from those instruments using another accounting method.
We have elected the fair value option for eligible financial assets and liabilities of our consolidated securitization VIEs, loans held-for-sale originated or acquired for future securitization, purchased CMBS issued by VIEs we could consolidate in the future and certain investments in marketable equity securities. The fair value elections for VIE and securitization related items were made in order to mitigate accounting mismatches between the carrying value of the instruments and the related assets and liabilities that we consolidate at fair value. The fair value elections for
13
mortgage loans held-for-sale were made due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The fair value elections for investments in marketable equity securities were made because the shares are listed on an exchange, which allows us to determine the fair value using a quoted price from an active market.
Fair Value Measurements
We measure our mortgage‑backed securities, derivative assets and liabilities, domestic servicing rights intangible asset and any assets or liabilities where we have elected the fair value option at fair value. When actively quoted observable prices are not available, we either use implied pricing from similar assets and liabilities or valuation models based on net present values of estimated future cash flows, adjusted as appropriate for liquidity, credit, market and/or other risk factors.
As discussed above, we measure the assets and liabilities of consolidated securitization VIEs at fair value pursuant to our election of the fair value option. The securitization VIEs in which we invest are “static”; that is, no reinvestment is permitted, and there is no active management of the underlying assets. In determining the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the securitization VIE, we maximize the use of observable inputs over unobservable inputs. We also acknowledge that our principal market for selling CMBS assets is the securitization market where the market participant is considered to be a CMBS trust or a collateralized debt obligation (“CDO”). This methodology results in the fair value of the assets of a static CMBS trust being equal to the fair value of its liabilities. Refer to Note 19 for further discussion regarding our fair value measurements.
Loans Held-for-Investment and Provision for Loan Losses
Loans that are held for investment are carried at cost, net of unamortized acquisition premiums or discounts, loan fees, and origination costs as applicable, unless the loans are deemed impaired. We evaluate each loan classified as held-for-investment for impairment at least quarterly. In connection with this evaluation, we assess the performance of each loan and assign a risk rating based on several factors, including risk of loss, loan-to-collateral value ratio (“LTV”), collateral performance, structure, exit plan, and sponsorship. Loans are rated “1” through “5”, from less risk to greater risk, in connection with this review.
Impairment occurs when it is deemed probable that we will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. If a loan is considered to be impaired, we record an allowance through the provision for loan losses to reduce the carrying value of the loan to the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s contractual effective rate or the fair value of the collateral, if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Actual losses, if any, could ultimately differ from these estimates.
Earnings Per Share
We present both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) amounts in our financial statements. Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the maximum potential dilution that could occur from (i) our share-based compensation, consisting of unvested restricted stock (“RSAs”) and restricted stock units (“RSUs”), (ii) shares contingently issuable to our Manager, and (iii) the “in-the-money” conversion options associated with our outstanding convertible senior notes (see further discussion in Notes 10 and 17). Potential dilutive shares are excluded from the calculation if they have an anti-dilutive effect in the period.
Nearly all of the Company’s unvested RSUs and RSAs contain rights to receive non-forfeitable dividends and thus are participating securities. Due to the existence of these participating securities, the two-class method of computing EPS is required, unless another method is determined to be more dilutive. Under the two-class method, undistributed earnings are reallocated between shares of common stock and participating securities. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the two-class method resulted in the most dilutive EPS calculation.
14
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash includes cash and cash equivalents that are legally or contractually restricted as to withdrawal or usage and primarily includes cash collateral associated with derivative financial instruments and funds held on behalf of borrowers and tenants. Effective January 1, 2017, we early adopted ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) – Restricted Cash, which requires that restricted cash be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. As required by this ASU, we applied this change retrospectively to our prior period condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2016.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The most significant and subjective estimate that we make is the projection of cash flows we expect to receive on our loans, investment securities and intangible assets, which has a significant impact on the amounts of interest income, credit losses (if any), and fair values that we record and/or disclose. In addition, the fair value of financial assets and liabilities that are estimated using a discounted cash flows method is significantly impacted by the rates at which we estimate market participants would discount the expected cash flows.
Recent Accounting Developments
On May 28, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which establishes key principles by which an entity determines the amount and timing of revenue recognized from customer contracts. At issuance, the ASU was effective for the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2016. On August 12, 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers – Deferral of the Effective Date, which delayed the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year, resulting in the ASU becoming effective for the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2017. Though we have not completed our assessment of this ASU, we do not expect its application to materially impact the Company as our material revenue sources are not within the scope of the ASU.
On January 5, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10) – Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which impacts the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. The ASU shall be applied prospectively and is effective for annual periods, and interim periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early application is not permitted. We do not expect the application of this ASU to materially impact the Company.
On February 25, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which establishes a right-of-use model for lessee accounting which results in the recognition of most leased assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet of the lessee. Lessor accounting was not significantly changed by the ASU. The ASU is effective for annual periods, and interim periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2018 by applying a modified retrospective approach. Early application is permitted. We are in the process of assessing the impact this ASU will have on the Company.
On March 17, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) – Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net), which amends the principal-versus-agent implementation guidance and illustrations in the FASB’s revenue recognition standard issued in ASU 2014-09. The ASU provides further guidance to assist an entity in determining whether the nature of its promise to its customer is to provide the underlying goods or services, meaning the entity is a principal, or to arrange for a third party to provide the underlying goods or services, meaning the entity is an agent. The ASU is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2017. Early application is permitted though no earlier than the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2016. We do not expect the application of this ASU to materially impact the Company.
15
On April 14, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) – Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, which amends guidance and illustrations in the FASB’s revenue recognition standard issued in ASU 2014-09 regarding the identification of performance obligations and the implementation guidance on licensing arrangements. The ASU is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2017. Early application is permitted. We do not expect the application of this ASU to materially impact the Company.
On June 16, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326) – Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which mandates use of an “expected loss” credit model for estimating future credit losses of certain financial instruments instead of the “incurred loss” credit model that current GAAP requires. The “expected loss” model requires the consideration of possible credit losses over the life of an instrument as opposed to only estimating credit losses upon the occurrence of a discrete loss event in accordance with the current “incurred loss” methodology. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early application is permitted though no earlier than the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2018. Though we have not completed our assessment of this ASU, we expect the ASU to result in our recognition of higher levels of allowances for loan losses. Our assessment of the estimated amount of such increases remains in process.
On August 26, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) – Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which seeks to reduce diversity in practice regarding how various cash receipts and payments are reported within the statement of cash flows. The ASU is effective for annual periods, and interim periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early application is permitted in any interim or annual period. We do not expect the application of this ASU to materially impact the Company.
On October 24, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740) – Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, which requires that an entity recognize the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory at the time of the transfer instead of deferring the tax consequences until the asset has been sold to an outside party, as current GAAP requires. The ASU is effective for annual periods, and interim periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early application is permitted in any interim or annual period. We do not expect the application of this ASU to materially impact the Company.
On January 5, 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805) – Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which amends the definition of a business to exclude acquisitions of groups of assets where substantially all of the fair value of the assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets. The ASU is effective for annual periods, and interim periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2017 and is applied prospectively. Early application is permitted. We expect most real estate acquired by the Company subsequent to the ASU’s effective date will no longer be accounted for as business combinations and instead be accounted for as asset acquisitions.
On January 26, 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) – Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which simplifies the method applied for measuring impairment in cases where goodwill is impaired. The ASU specifies that goodwill impairment will be measured as the excess of the reporting unit’s carrying value (inclusive of goodwill) over its fair value, eliminating the requirement that all assets and liabilities of the reporting unit be remeasured individually in connection with measurement of goodwill impairment. The ASU is effective for annual periods, and interim periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2019 and is applied prospectively. Early application is permitted though no earlier than January 1, 2017. We do not expect the application of this ASU to materially impact the Company.
On February 22, 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-05, Other Income – Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Topic 610-20), which requires that all entities account for the derecognition of a business in accordance with ASC 810, including instances in which the business is considered in substance real estate. The ASU is effective for annual periods, and interim periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early application is permitted. We do not expect the application of this ASU to materially impact the Company.
16
3. Acquisitions and Dispositions
Investing and Servicing Segment Property Portfolio
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, our Investing and Servicing Segment acquired the net equity of a commercial real estate property from a CMBS trust for $19.0 million. This property, aggregated with the controlling interests in 24 commercial real estate properties acquired from CMBS trusts during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016 for an aggregate acquisition price of $268.5 million, comprise the Investing and Servicing Segment Property Portfolio (the “REO Portfolio”). When the properties are acquired from CMBS trusts that are consolidated as VIEs on our balance sheet, the acquisitions are reflected as repayment of debt of consolidated VIEs in our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.
We applied the provisions of ASC 805, Business Combinations, in accounting for the REO Portfolio acquisitions. No goodwill was recognized in connection with the REO Portfolio acquisitions as the purchase prices did not exceed the fair values of the net assets acquired. A bargain purchase gain of $0.6 million and $8.8 million was recognized within change in net assets related to consolidated VIEs in our condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and the year ended December 31, 2016, respectively, as the fair value of the net assets acquired for certain properties exceeded the purchase price.
During the six months ended June 30, 2017, in accordance with ASU 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805) – Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments, we adjusted our initial provisional estimates of the acquisition date fair values of the identified assets acquired and liabilities assumed for a certain property acquired within the REO Portfolio during the year ended December 31, 2016 to reflect new information obtained regarding facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date. The following table summarizes the measurement period adjustment applied to the initial provisional acquisition date balance sheet (amounts in thousands):
2016 Acquisition Adjustment
Measurement
Initial
Period
Adjusted
Assets acquired:
Amounts
Adjustment
Properties
12,087
660
12,747
Intangible assets
4,270
(802)
3,468
97
Total assets acquired
16,454
(142)
16,312
Liabilities assumed:
1,539
1,397
Total liabilities assumed
Non-controlling interests
3,084
Net assets acquired
11,831
The net income effect associated with the measurement period adjustment during the six months ended June 30, 2017 was immaterial.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, we sold two properties within the Investing and Servicing Segment for $14.7 million, recognizing a $5.1 million gain on sale within gain on sale of investments and other assets in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Medical Office Portfolio
The Medical Office Portfolio is comprised of 34 medical office buildings acquired for a purchase price of $758.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2016. These properties, which collectively comprise 1.9 million square feet, are geographically dispersed throughout the U.S. and primarily affiliated with major hospitals or located on or adjacent to major hospital campuses. No goodwill or bargain purchase gains were recognized in connection with the Medical Office Portfolio acquisition as the purchase price equaled the fair value of the net assets acquired.
17
Woodstar Portfolio
The Woodstar Portfolio is comprised of 32 affordable housing communities with 8,948 units concentrated primarily in the Tampa, Orlando and West Palm Beach metropolitan areas. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we acquired 18 of the 32 affordable housing communities of the Woodstar Portfolio with the final 14 communities acquired during the year ended December 31, 2016 for an aggregate acquisition price of $421.5 million. We assumed federal, state and county sponsored financing and other debt in connection with this acquisition.
No goodwill was recognized in connection with the Woodstar Portfolio acquisition as the purchase price did not exceed the fair value of the net assets acquired. A bargain purchase gain of $8.4 million was recognized within other income, net in our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016 as the fair value of the net assets acquired exceeded the purchase price due to favorable changes in net asset fair values occurring between the date the purchase price was negotiated and the closing date.
Ireland Portfolio
The Ireland Portfolio was initially comprised of 12 net leased fully occupied office properties and one multi-family property all located in Dublin, Ireland, which the Company acquired during the year ended December 31, 2015. The Ireland Portfolio, which collectively is comprised of approximately 600,000 square feet, included total assets of $518.2 million and assumed debt of $283.0 million at acquisition. Following our acquisition, all assumed debt was immediately extinguished and replaced with new financing of $328.6 million from the Ireland Portfolio Mortgage (as set forth in Note 9). No goodwill or bargain purchase gain was recognized in connection with the Ireland Portfolio acquisition as the purchase price equaled the fair value of the net assets acquired.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, we sold one office property within the Ireland Portfolio for $3.9 million, recognizing an immaterial gain on sale within gain on sale of investments and other assets in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Purchase Price Allocations of Acquisitions
We applied the provisions of ASC 805, Business Combinations, in accounting for the 2017 REO Portfolio acquisition. In doing so, we have recorded all identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. These amounts are provisional and may be adjusted during the measurement period, which expires no later than one year from the acquisition date, if new information is obtained that, if known, would have affected the amounts recognized as of the acquisition date.
The following table summarizes the identified assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date (amounts in thousands):
REO
Portfolio
18,301
1,917
1
20,219
567
18
4. Loans
Our loans held-for-investment are accounted for at amortized cost and our loans held-for-sale are accounted for at the lower of cost or fair value, unless we have elected the fair value option. The following tables summarize our investments in mortgages and loans by subordination class as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):
Weighted
Average Life
Carrying
Face
Average
(“WAL”)
Coupon
(years)(1)
First mortgages (2)
5,312,749
5,326,758
6.3
%
1.9
Subordinated mortgages (3)
272,975
287,506
9.6
3.1
Mezzanine loans (2)
630,383
630,296
10.6
1.5
1,757
9.9
1.2
Total loans held-for-investment
6,217,864
6,246,317
Loans held-for-sale, fair value option
606,139
5.4
7.6
Total gross loans
6,827,980
6,852,456
Loan loss allowance (loans held-for-investment)
(6,789)
Total net loans
6,821,191
4,865,994
4,881,656
5.7
2.2
278,032
293,925
8.9
3.3
713,757
714,608
1.8
5,857,783
5,890,189
63,065
5.3
10.0
6.2
0.4
5,956,062
5,988,254
(9,788)
5,946,274
(1)
Represents the WAL of each respective group of loans as of the respective balance sheet date. The WAL of each individual loan is calculated using amounts and timing of future principal payments, as projected at origination or acquisition.
(2)
First mortgages include first mortgage loans and any contiguous mezzanine loan components because as a whole, the expected credit quality of these loans is more similar to that of a first mortgage loan. The application of this methodology resulted in mezzanine loans with carrying values of $1.1 billion and $964.1 million being classified as first mortgages as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
(3)
Subordinated mortgages include B-Notes and junior participation in first mortgages where we do not own the senior A-Note or senior participation. If we own both the A-Note and B-Note, we categorize the loan as a first mortgage loan.
19
As of June 30, 2017, approximately $5.7 billion, or 92.2%, of our loans held-for-investment were variable rate and paid interest principally at LIBOR plus a weighted-average spread of 5.4%. The following table summarizes our investments in floating rate loans (dollars in thousands):
Index
Base Rate
One-month LIBOR USD
1.2239
889,846
0.7717
880,357
LIBOR floor
0.15 - 3.00
% (1)
4,845,782
4,449,861
5,735,628
5,330,218
The weighted-average LIBOR floor was 0.47% and 0.36% as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
Our loans are typically collateralized by real estate. As a result, we regularly evaluate the extent and impact of any credit deterioration associated with the performance and/or value of the underlying collateral property, as well as the financial and operating capability of the borrower. Specifically, a property’s operating results and any cash reserves are analyzed and used to assess (i) whether cash flow from operations is sufficient to cover the debt service requirements currently and into the future, (ii) the ability of the borrower to refinance the loan at maturity, and/or (iii) the property’s liquidation value. We also evaluate the financial wherewithal of any loan guarantors as well as the borrower’s competency in managing and operating the properties. In addition, we consider the overall economic environment, real estate sector, and geographic sub-market in which the borrower operates. Such impairment analyses are completed and reviewed by asset management and finance personnel who utilize various data sources, including (i) periodic financial data such as property operating statements, occupancy, tenant profile, rental rates, operating expenses, the borrower’s exit plan, and capitalization and discount rates, (ii) site inspections, and (iii) current credit spreads and discussions with market participants.
Our evaluation process, as described above produces an internal risk rating between 1 and 5, which is a weighted average of the numerical ratings in the following categories: (i) sponsor capability and financial condition, (ii) loan and collateral performance relative to underwriting, (iii) quality and stability of collateral cash flows, and (iv) loan structure. We utilize the overall risk ratings as a concise means to monitor any credit migration on a loan as well as on the whole portfolio. While the overall risk rating is generally not the sole factor we use in determining whether a loan is impaired, a loan with a higher overall risk rating would tend to have more adverse indicators of impairment, and therefore would be more likely to experience a credit loss.
20
The rating categories generally include the characteristics described below, but these are utilized as guidelines and therefore not every loan will have all of the characteristics described in each category:
Rating
Characteristics
Sponsor capability and financial condition—Sponsor is highly rated or investment grade or, if private, the equivalent thereof with significant management experience.
Loan collateral and performance relative to underwriting—The collateral has surpassed underwritten expectations.
Quality and stability of collateral cash flows—Occupancy is stabilized, the property has had a history of consistently high occupancy, and the property has a diverse and high quality tenant mix.
Loan structure—LTV does not exceed 65%. The loan has structural features that enhance the credit profile.
Sponsor capability and financial condition—Strong sponsorship with experienced management team and a responsibly leveraged portfolio.
Loan collateral and performance relative to underwriting—Collateral performance equals or exceeds underwritten expectations and covenants and performance criteria are being met or exceeded.
Quality and stability of collateral cash flows—Occupancy is stabilized with a diverse tenant mix.
Loan structure—LTV does not exceed 70% and unique property risks are mitigated by structural features.
Sponsor capability and financial condition—Sponsor has historically met its credit obligations, routinely pays off loans at maturity, and has a capable management team.
Loan collateral and performance relative to underwriting—Property performance is consistent with underwritten expectations.
Quality and stability of collateral cash flows—Occupancy is stabilized, near stabilized, or is on track with underwriting.
Loan structure—LTV does not exceed 80%.
Sponsor capability and financial condition—Sponsor credit history includes missed payments, past due payment, and maturity extensions. Management team is capable but thin.
Loan collateral and performance relative to underwriting—Property performance lags behind underwritten expectations. Performance criteria and loan covenants have required occasional waivers. A sale of the property may be necessary in order for the borrower to pay off the loan at maturity.
Quality and stability of collateral cash flows—Occupancy is not stabilized and the property has a large amount of rollover.
Loan structure—LTV is 80% to 90%.
Sponsor capability and financial condition—Credit history includes defaults, deeds‑in‑lieu, foreclosures, and/or bankruptcies.
Loan collateral and performance relative to underwriting—Property performance is significantly worse than underwritten expectations. The loan is not in compliance with loan covenants and performance criteria and may be in default. Sale proceeds would not be sufficient to pay off the loan at maturity.
Quality and stability of collateral cash flows—The property has material vacancy and significant rollover of remaining tenants.
Loan structure—LTV exceeds 90%.
21
As of June 30, 2017, the risk ratings for loans subject to our rating system, which excludes loans for which the fair value option has been elected, by class of loan were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Balance Sheet Classification
Loans Held-For-Investment
% of
Risk Rating
First
Subordinated
Mezzanine
Loans Held-
Category
Mortgages
Loans
For-Sale
2,414
64,915
67,329
1.0
4,447
77,808
1,619,757
23.7
268,528
428,467
4,214,644
61.7
198,462
59,193
257,655
3.8
58,479
0.9
N/A
As of December 31, 2016, the risk ratings for loans subject to our rating system, which excludes loans for which the fair value option has been elected, by class of loan were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Transferred
As Secured
Borrowings
921
1,092,731
27,069
194,803
1,349,603
22.6
3,348,874
250,963
425,972
4,025,809
67.6
365,151
92,982
458,133
7.7
58,317
1.1
100.0
After completing our impairment evaluation process as of June 30, 2017, we concluded that none of our loans were impaired and therefore no individual loan impairment charges were required on any individual loans, as we expect to collect all outstanding principal and interest. None of our loans were 90 days or greater past due as of June 30, 2017.
22
In accordance with our policies, we record an allowance for loan losses equal to (i) 1.5% of the aggregate carrying amount of loans rated as a “4,” plus (ii) 5% of the aggregate carrying amount of loans rated as a “5, ” plus (iii) impaired loan reserves, if any. The following table presents the activity in our allowance for loan losses (amounts in thousands):
Allowance for loan losses at January 1
9,788
6,029
Provision for loan losses
Charge-offs
Recoveries
Allowance for loan losses at June 30
6,789
7,297
Recorded investment in loans related to the allowance for loan loss
316,134
341,343
The activity in our loan portfolio was as follows (amounts in thousands):
Balance at January 1
Acquisitions/originations/additional funding
2,231,907
Capitalized interest (1)
33,817
44,875
Basis of loans sold (2)
(507,613)
(596,454)
Loan maturities/principal repayments
(948,712)
(1,199,205)
Discount accretion/premium amortization
16,194
23,362
Changes in fair value
Unrealized foreign currency remeasurement gain (loss)
19,565
(33,325)
Change in loan loss allowance, net
2,999
(1,268)
Transfer to/from other asset classifications
761
9,353
Balance at June 30
6,023,826
Represents accrued interest income on loans whose terms do not require current payment of interest.
See Note 11 for additional disclosure on these transactions.
Primarily represents commercial mortgage loans acquired from CMBS trusts which are consolidated as VIEs on our balance sheet.
23
5. Investment Securities
Investment securities were comprised of the following as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (amounts in thousands):
Carrying Value as of
RMBS, available-for-sale
256,397
253,915
CMBS, fair value option (1)
1,009,151
990,570
Held-to-maturity (“HTM”) securities
465,802
509,980
Equity security, fair value option
12,887
12,177
Subtotal—Investment securities
1,744,237
1,766,642
VIE eliminations (1)
(995,303)
(959,024)
Total investment securities
Certain fair value option CMBS are eliminated in consolidation against VIE liabilities pursuant to ASC 810.
Purchases, sales and principal collections for all investment securities were as follows (amounts in thousands):
RMBS,
CMBS, fair
HTM
available-for-sale
value option
Securities
Security
Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
Purchases (1)
7,433
Sales (2)
700
Principal collections
8,555
1,322
332
10,209
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
46,866
24,403
195,036
266,305
16,197
7,142
1,861
25,200
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
Purchases (3)
Sales (4)
18,783
7,088
60,388
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
88,336
57,576
204,730
23,008
19,445
5,091
During the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, we purchased $4.3 million and $54.8 million of CMBS, respectively, for which we elected the fair value option. Due to our consolidation of securitization VIEs, $4.3 million and $30.4 million, respectively, of this amount is eliminated and reflected as repayment of debt of consolidated VIEs in our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.
During the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, we sold $6.1 million and $1.3 million of CMBS, respectively, for which we had previously elected the fair value option. Due to our consolidation of securitization VIEs, $5.4 million of our sales during the three months ended June 30, 2017 is eliminated and reflected as issuance of debt of consolidated VIEs in our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. During the three months ended June 30, 2016, none of our sales were eliminated due to the consolidation of securitization VIEs.
24
During the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, we purchased $61.7 million and $101.3 million of CMBS, respectively, for which we elected the fair value option. Due to our consolidation of securitization VIEs, $61.7 million and $43.8 million, respectively, of this amount is eliminated and reflected as repayment of debt of consolidated VIEs in our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.
(4)
During the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, we sold $21.3 million and $1.9 million of CMBS, respectively, for which we had previously elected the fair value option. Due to our consolidation of securitization VIEs, $10.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of this amount is eliminated and reflected as issuance of debt of consolidated VIEs in our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.
RMBS, Available-for-Sale
The Company classified all of its RMBS as available-for-sale as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. These RMBS are reported at fair value in the balance sheet with changes in fair value recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”).
The tables below summarize various attributes of our investments in available-for-sale RMBS as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (amounts in thousands):
Unrealized Gains or (Losses)
Recognized in AOCI
Purchase
Recorded
Gross
Net
Amortized
Credit
Non-Credit
Unrealized
Fair Value
Cost
OTTI
Gains
Losses
RMBS
214,612
(9,897)
204,715
51,730
51,682
219,171
(10,185)
208,986
(94)
45,113
44,929
Weighted Average Coupon (1)
Weighted Average Rating
WAL (Years) (2)
2.4
B-
6.5
2.1
B
6.1
Calculated using the June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 one-month LIBOR rate of 1.224% and 0.772%, respectively, for floating rate securities.
Represents the WAL of each respective group of securities as of the respective balance sheet date. The WAL of each individual security is calculated using projected amounts and projected timing of future principal payments.
As of June 30, 2017, approximately $213.4 million, or 83.2%, of RMBS were variable rate and paid interest at LIBOR plus a weighted average spread of 1.20%. As of December 31, 2016, approximately $211.1 million, or 83.2%, of RMBS were variable rate and paid interest at LIBOR plus a weighted average spread of 1.22%. We purchased all of the RMBS at a discount that will be accreted into income over the expected remaining life of the security. The majority of the income from this strategy is earned from the accretion of these discounts.
25
The following table contains a reconciliation of aggregate principal balance to amortized cost for our RMBS as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (amounts in thousands):
Principal balance
391,200
399,883
Accretable yield
(59,777)
(64,290)
Non-accretable difference
(126,708)
(126,607)
Total discount
(186,485)
(190,897)
Amortized cost
The principal balance of credit deteriorated RMBS was $366.2 million and $371.5 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Accretable yield related to these securities totaled $52.5 million and $55.9 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
The following table discloses the changes to accretable yield and non-accretable difference for our RMBS during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 (amounts in thousands):
Non-Accretable
Accretable Yield
Difference
Balance as of April 1, 2017
60,818
124,742
Accretion of discount
(3,302)
Principal write-downs, net
(916)
Purchases
311
4,723
Sales
109
Transfer to/from non-accretable difference
1,841
(1,841)
Balance as of June 30, 2017
59,777
126,708
Balance as of January 1, 2017
64,290
126,607
(7,188)
(2,367)
2,255
(2,255)
We have engaged a third party manager who specializes in RMBS to execute the trading of RMBS, the cost of which was $0.5 million and $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $0.9 million and $0.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, which has been recorded as management fees in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
26
The following table presents the gross unrealized losses and estimated fair value of any available-for-sale securities that were in an unrealized loss position as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and for which OTTIs (full or partial) have not been recognized in earnings (amounts in thousands):
Estimated Fair Value
Unrealized Losses
Securities with a
loss less than
loss greater than
12 months
649
As of December 31, 2016
8,819
957
As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were one and three securities, respectively, with unrealized losses reflected in the table above. After evaluating these securities and recording adjustments for credit-related OTTI, we concluded that the remaining unrealized losses reflected above were noncredit-related and would be recovered from the securities’ estimated future cash flows. We considered a number of factors in reaching this conclusion, including that we did not intend to sell the securities, it was not considered more likely than not that we would be forced to sell the securities prior to recovering our amortized cost, and there were no material credit events that would have caused us to otherwise conclude that we would not recover our cost. Credit losses, which represent most of the OTTI we record on securities, are calculated by comparing (i) the estimated future cash flows of each security discounted at the yield determined as of the initial acquisition date or, if since revised, as of the last date previously revised, to (ii) our amortized cost basis. Significant judgment is used in projecting cash flows for our non-agency RMBS. As a result, actual income and/or impairments could be materially different from what is currently projected and/or reported.
CMBS, Fair Value Option
As discussed in the “Fair Value Option” section of Note 2 herein, we elect the fair value option for the Investing and Servicing Segment’s CMBS in an effort to eliminate accounting mismatches resulting from the current or potential consolidation of securitization VIEs. As of June 30, 2017, the fair value and unpaid principal balance of CMBS where we have elected the fair value option, before consolidation of securitization VIEs, were $1.0 billion and $4.1 billion, respectively. The $1.0 billion fair value balance represents our economic interests in these assets. However, as a result of our consolidation of securitization VIEs, the vast majority of this fair value ($995.3 million at June 30, 2017) is eliminated against VIE liabilities before arriving at our GAAP balance for fair value option CMBS.
As of June 30, 2017, none of our CMBS where we have elected the fair value option were variable rate.
HTM Securities
The table below summarizes unrealized gains and losses of our investments in HTM securities as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (amounts in thousands):
Net Carrying Amount
Gross Unrealized
(Amortized Cost)
Holding Gains
Holding Losses
CMBS
445,691
3,262
(6,482)
442,471
Preferred interests
20,111
697
20,808
3,959
463,279
490,107
2,106
(8,648)
483,565
19,873
727
20,600
2,833
504,165
27
The table below summarizes the maturities of our HTM CMBS and our HTM preferred equity interests in limited liability companies that own commercial real estate as of June 30, 2017 (amounts in thousands):
Preferred
Less than one year
240,439
One to three years
189,041
Three to five years
16,211
Thereafter
Equity Security, Fair Value Option
During 2012, we acquired 9,140,000 ordinary shares from a related-party in Starwood European Real Estate Finance Limited (“SEREF”), a debt fund that is externally managed by an affiliate of our Manager and is listed on the London Stock Exchange. We have elected to report the investment using the fair value option because the shares are listed on an exchange, which allows us to determine the fair value using a quoted price from an active market, and also due to potential lags in reporting resulting from differences in the respective regulatory requirements. The fair value of the investment remeasured in USD was $12.9 million and $12.2 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. As of June 30, 2017, our shares represent an approximate 2% interest in SEREF.
6. Properties
Our properties include the Medical Office Portfolio, Woodstar Portfolio, REO Portfolio and Ireland Portfolio as discussed in Note 3. The table below summarizes our properties held as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):
Depreciable Life
Property Segment
Land and land improvements
0 – 12 years
397,427
385,860
Buildings and building improvements
5 – 40 years
1,312,982
1,291,531
Furniture & fixtures
3 – 7 years
24,651
23,035
Investing and Servicing Segment
0 – 15 years
87,711
89,425
3 – 40 years
209,180
195,178
3 – 5 years
1,333
1,256
Properties, cost
2,033,284
1,986,285
Less: accumulated depreciation
(72,786)
(41,565)
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, we sold three operating properties for $18.6 million which resulted in a $5.2 million gain recognized within gain on sale of investments and other assets in our condensed consolidated statement of operations. There were no properties sold during the six months ended June 30, 2016.
28
7. Investment in Unconsolidated Entities
The table below summarizes our investments in unconsolidated entities as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):
Participation /
Carrying value as of
Ownership % (1)
Equity method:
Retail Fund
33%
127,795
124,977
Investor entity which owns equity in an online real estate company
50%
47,058
21,677
Equity interests in commercial real estate
16% - 50%
23,219
23,297
Various
25% - 50%
6,689
6,640
204,761
176,591
Cost method:
Equity interest in a servicing and advisory business
6%
12,234
Investment funds which own equity in a loan servicer and other real estate assets
4% - 6%
9,225
2% - 3%
3,319
6,555
24,778
28,014
None of these investments are publicly traded and therefore quoted market prices are not available.
During the three months ended June 30, 2017, we recognized $25.7 million of income related to our investment in an investor entity which owns equity in an online real estate company. The investor entity holds a variety of equity instruments in the online real estate company, some of which are marked to market. The income we recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2017 represents our share of an increase in the fair value of those instruments (see related income tax effect in Note 20). There were no differences between the carrying value of our equity method investments and the underlying equity in the net assets of the investees as of June 30, 2017.
8. Goodwill and Intangibles
Goodwill at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 represented the excess of consideration transferred over the fair value of net assets of LNR Property LLC (“LNR”) acquired on April 19, 2013. The goodwill recognized is attributable to value embedded in LNR’s existing platform, which includes an international network of commercial real estate asset managers, work-out specialists, underwriters and administrative support professionals as well as proprietary historical performance data on commercial real estate assets.
Intangible Assets
Servicing Rights Intangibles
In connection with the LNR acquisition, we identified domestic and European servicing rights that existed at the purchase date, based upon the expected future cash flows of the associated servicing contracts. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we contributed our European servicing and advisory business to an unrelated entity in exchange for a non-controlling equity interest in that entity and therefore no longer have any European servicing rights.
At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the balance of the domestic servicing intangible was net of $27.4 million and $34.2 million, respectively, which was eliminated in consolidation pursuant to ASC 810 against VIE assets in connection with our consolidation of securitization VIEs. Before VIE consolidation, as of June 30, 2017 and
29
December 31, 2016, the domestic servicing intangible had a balance of $66.0 million and $89.3 million, respectively, which represents our economic interest in this asset.
Lease Intangibles
In connection with our acquisitions of commercial real estate, we recognized in-place lease intangible assets and favorable lease intangible assets associated with certain noncancelable operating leases of the acquired properties.
The following table summarizes our intangible assets, which are comprised of servicing rights intangibles and lease intangibles, as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (amounts in thousands):
Gross Carrying
Net Carrying
Amortization
Domestic servicing rights, at fair value
38,648
55,082
In-place lease intangible assets
179,362
(52,838)
126,524
175,409
(38,532)
136,877
Favorable lease intangible assets
31,523
(5,329)
26,194
30,459
(3,170)
27,289
Total net intangible assets
249,533
(58,167)
260,950
(41,702)
The following table summarizes the activity within intangible assets for the six months ended June 20, 2017 (amounts in thousands):
Domestic
In-place Lease
Favorable Lease
Servicing
Intangible
Rights
Assets
Acquisition of additional REO Portfolio properties
1,821
96
(13,364)
(1,948)
(15,312)
Foreign exchange (loss) gain
2,769
738
3,507
Impairment (1)
(758)
Changes in fair value due to changes in inputs and assumptions
Measurement period adjustments
(821)
Impairment of intangible lease assets is recognized within other expense in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.
The following table sets forth the estimated aggregate amortization of our in-place lease intangible assets and favorable lease intangible assets for the next five years and thereafter (amounts in thousands):
2017 (remainder of)
15,038
2018
27,101
2019
20,672
2020
15,504
2021
13,290
61,113
152,718
30
9. Secured Financing Agreements
The following table is a summary of our secured financing agreements in place as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):
Carrying Value at
Current Maturity
Extended Maturity (a)
Pricing
Pledged Asset Carrying Value
Maximum Facility Size
Lender 1 Repo 1
(b)
LIBOR + 1.75% to 5.75%
1,637,815
(c)
Lender 2 Repo 1
Oct 2017
Oct 2020
LIBOR + 1.75% to 2.75%
363,744
500,000
110,646
Lender 3 Repo 1
May 2018
May 2019
LIBOR + 2.75% to 3.10%
110,193
77,645
78,288
Lender 4 Repo 2
Dec 2018
Dec 2020
LIBOR + 2.00% to 2.50%
624,738
(d)
230,740
166,394
Lender 6 Repo 1
Aug 2019
LIBOR + 2.50% to 2.75%
268,037
210,254
Lender 6 Repo 2
Nov 2019
Nov 2020
GBP LIBOR + 2.75%
181,171
126,627
Lender 9 Repo 1
Dec 2017
LIBOR + 1.65%
379,111
283,575
Lender 10 Repo 1
Mar 2020
Mar 2022
LIBOR + 2.00% to 2.75%
169,610
140,000
136,800
Lender 11 Repo 1
Jun 2019
Jun 2020
LIBOR + 2.75%
200,000
Lender 7 Secured Financing
Jul 2018
Jul 2019
(e)
85,324
650,000
(f)
Lender 8 Secured Financing
LIBOR + 4.00%
49,183
75,000
32,124
43,555
Conduit Repo 2
Nov 2017
LIBOR + 2.25%
138,789
150,000
109,070
14,944
Conduit Repo 3
Feb 2018
LIBOR + 2.10%
Conduit Repo 4
100,000
MBS Repo 1
(g)
LIBOR + 1.90%
31,250
20,838
21,052
MBS Repo 2
LIBOR/EURIBOR + 2.00% to 2.95%
344,829
250,178
239,434
MBS Repo 3
(h)
LIBOR + 1.32% to 1.95%
386,771
256,832
MBS Repo 4
(i)
LIBOR + 1.20% to 1.90%
184,678
225,000
32,000
5,633
Investing and Servicing Segment Property Mortgages
Feb 2018 to Jun 2026
235,310
192,596
172,953
164,611
Ireland Portfolio Mortgage
May 2020
EURIBOR + 1.69%
477,387
333,225
Woodstar Portfolio Mortgages
Nov 2025 to Oct 2026
3.72% to 3.97%
371,409
276,748
Woodstar Portfolio Government Financing
Mar 2026 to Jun 2049
1.00% to 5.00%
310,303
134,510
135,584
Medical Office Portfolio Mortgages
Dec 2021 to Feb 2022
Dec 2023 to Feb 2024
LIBOR + 2.50%
(j)
749,973
531,815
497,613
491,197
Term Loan A
Dec 2021
858,717
300,000
Revolving Secured Financing
7,958,342
Unamortized net premium
2,599
2,640
Unamortized deferred financing costs
(40,672)
(45,732)
(a)
Subject to certain conditions as defined in the respective facility agreement.
Maturity date for borrowings collateralized by loans is September 2018 before extension options and September 2021 assuming exercise of extension options. Borrowings collateralized by loans existing at maturity may remain outstanding until such loan collateral matures, subject to certain specified conditions and not to exceed September 2025.
The initial maximum facility size of $1.8 billion may be increased to $2.0 billion, subject to certain conditions.
The initial maximum facility size of $600.0 million may be increased to $1.0 billion at our option, subject to certain conditions.
Subject to borrower’s option to choose alternative benchmark based rates pursuant to the terms of the credit agreement.
31
The initial maximum facility size of $450.0 million may be increased to $650.0 million, subject to certain conditions.
Facility carries a rolling 11 month term which may reset monthly with the lender’s consent not to exceed December 2018. This facility carries no maximum facility size. Amounts reflect the outstanding balance as of June 30, 2017.
Facility carries a rolling 12 month term which may reset monthly with the lender’s consent. Current maturity is June 2018. This facility carries no maximum facility size. Amounts reflect the outstanding balance as of June 30, 2017.
The date that is 270 days after the buyer delivers notice to seller, subject to a maximum date of May 2018.
Subject to a 25 basis point floor.
In the normal course of business, the Company is in discussions with its lenders to extend or amend any financing facilities which contain near term expirations.
In February 2017, we entered into a mortgage loan with maximum borrowings of $24.0 million to finance commercial real estate previously acquired by our Investing and Servicing Segment. This facility carries a term of five years with an annual interest rate of LIBOR + 2.00%.
In February 2017, we entered into a mortgage loan with maximum borrowings of $7.3 million as part of the Medical Office Portfolio Mortgages. This loan carries a five year initial term with two 12 month extension options and an annual interest rate of LIBOR + 2.50%.
In March 2017, we entered into a $125.0 million repurchase facility (“Lender 10 Repo 1”) to finance certain loans held-for-investment. The facility carries a three year initial term with two one-year extension options and an annual interest rate of LIBOR + 2.00% to 2.75%. In May 2017, we upsized the maximum facility size to $140.0 million utilizing an available accordion feature.
In March 2017, we amended the Lender 3 Repo 1 facility to extend the maturity from May 2017 to May 2018.
In June 2017, we entered into a $200.0 million repurchase facility (“Lender 11 Repo 1”) to finance certain mortgage loans held-for-sale. The facility carries a two-year initial term with a one-year extension option and an initial annual interest rate of LIBOR + 2.75%.
Our secured financing agreements contain certain financial tests and covenants. As of June 30, 2017, we were in compliance with all such covenants.
The following table sets forth our five‑year principal repayments schedule for secured financings assuming no defaults and excluding loans transferred as secured borrowings. Our credit facilities generally require principal to be paid down prior to the facilities’ respective maturities if and when we receive principal payments on, or sell, the investment collateral that we have pledged. The amount reflected in each period includes principal repayments on our credit facilities that would be required if (i) we received the repayments that we expect to receive on the investments that have been pledged as collateral under the credit facilities, as applicable, and (ii) the credit facilities that are expected to have
32
amounts outstanding at their current maturity dates are extended where extension options are available to us (amounts in thousands):
Repurchase
Other Secured
Agreements
Financing
876,451
34,118
910,569
894,295
68,064
962,359
402,900
5,115
408,015
578,062
346,675
924,737
135,353
315,687
451,040
154,762
977,514
3,041,823
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, approximately $4.7 million and $9.4 million, respectively, of amortization of deferred financing costs from secured financing agreements was included in interest expense on our condensed consolidated statements of operations. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, approximately $4.3 million and $8.2 million, respectively, of amortization of deferred financing costs from secured financing agreements was included in interest expense on our condensed consolidated statements of operations.
The following table sets forth our outstanding balance of repurchase agreements related to the following asset collateral classes as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (amounts in thousands):
Class of Collateral
Loans held-for-investment
2,305,593
1,890,925
Loans held-for-sale
176,382
34,024
Investment securities
559,848
551,328
2,476,277
We seek to mitigate risks associated with our repurchase agreements by managing risk related to the credit quality of our assets, interest rates, liquidity, prepayment speeds and market value. The margin call provisions under the majority of our repurchase facilities, consisting of 59% of these agreements, do not permit valuation adjustments based on capital markets activity. Instead, margin calls on these facilities are limited to collateral-specific credit marks. To monitor credit risk associated with the performance and value of our loans and investments, our asset management team regularly reviews our investment portfolios and is in regular contact with our borrowers, monitoring performance of the collateral and enforcing our rights as necessary. For repurchase agreements containing margin call provisions for general capital markets activity, approximately 19% of these pertain to our loans held-for-sale, for which we manage credit risk through the purchase of credit index instruments. We further seek to manage risks associated with our repurchase agreements by matching the maturities and interest rate characteristics of our loans with the related repurchase agreements.
33
10. Unsecured Senior Notes
The following table is a summary of our unsecured senior notes outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):
Remaining
Effective
Maturity
Period of
Rate
Rate (1)
Date
2017 Convertible Notes
3.75
5.86
10/15/2017
years
411,885
2018 Convertible Notes
4.55
6.10
3/1/2018
369,981
599,981
2019 Convertible Notes
4.00
5.35
1/15/2019
341,363
2021 Senior Notes
5.00
5.32
12/15/2021
700,000
2023 Convertible Notes
4.38
4.86
4/1/2023
250,000
Total principal amount
2,073,229
2,053,229
Unamortized discount—Convertible Notes
(19,110)
(26,135)
Unamortized discount—Senior Notes
(8,864)
(9,728)
(6,169)
(5,822)
Carrying amount of debt components
Carrying amount of conversion option equity components recorded in additional paid-in capital
31,638
45,988
Effective rate includes the effects of underwriter purchase discount and the adjustment for the conversion option on our convertible notes, the value of which reduced the initial liability and was recorded in additional paid‑in‑capital.
Senior Notes Due 2021
On December 16, 2016, we issued $700.0 million of 5.00% Senior Notes due 2021 (the “2021 Notes”). The 2021 Notes mature on December 15, 2021. Prior to September 15, 2021, we may redeem some or all of the 2021 Notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus the applicable “make-whole” premium as of the applicable date of redemption. On and after September 15, 2021, we may redeem some or all of the 2021 Notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof. In addition, we may redeem up to 35% of the 2021 Notes at the applicable redemption prices using the proceeds of certain equity offerings.
Convertible Senior Notes
On March 29, 2017, we issued $250.0 million of 4.375% Convertible Senior Notes due 2023 (the “2023 Notes”) resulting in gross proceeds of $247.5 million. At issuance, we allocated $243.7 million and $3.8 million of the carrying value of the 2023 Notes to its debt and equity components, respectively. Also on March 29, 2017, the proceeds from the issuance of the 2023 Notes were used to repurchase $230.0 million of the 4.55% Convertible Senior Notes due 2018 (the “2018 Notes”) for $250.7 million. The repurchase price was allocated between the fair value of the liability component and the fair value of the equity component of the 2018 Notes at the repurchase date. The portion of the repurchase price attributable to the equity component totaled $18.1 million and was recognized as a reduction of additional paid-in capital during the six months ended June 30, 2017. The portion of the repurchase price attributable to the liability component exceeded the net carrying amount of the liability component by $5.9 million, which was recognized as a loss on extinguishment of debt in our condensed consolidated statement of operations during the six months ended June 30, 2017. The repurchase of the 2018 Notes was not considered part of the repurchase program approved by our board of directors (refer to Note 16) and therefore does not reduce our available capacity for future
34
repurchases under the repurchase program. There were no repurchases of Convertible Notes during the six months ended June 30, 2016.
On October 8, 2014, we issued $431.3 million of 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2017 (the “2017 Notes”). On February 15, 2013, we issued $600.0 million of 4.55% Convertible Senior Notes due 2018 (the “2018 Notes”). On July 3, 2013, we issued $460.0 million of 4.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2019 (the “2019 Notes”).
The following table details the conversion attributes of our Convertible Notes outstanding as of June 30, 2017 (amounts in thousands, except rates):
Conversion Spread Value - Shares (3)
Conversion
For the Three Months Ended June 30,
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
Price (2)
2017 Notes
41.7397
23.96
2018 Notes
47.7946
20.92
1,162
1,157
2019 Notes
50.4531
19.82
1,980
441
1,971
2023 Notes
38.5959
25.91
3,142
3,128
The conversion rate represents the number of shares of common stock issuable per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes converted, as adjusted in accordance with the indentures governing the Convertible Notes (including the applicable supplemental indentures) as a result of the spin-off of our former single family residential segment to our stockholders in January 2014 and cash dividend payments.
As of June 30, 2017 and 2016, the market price of the Company’s common stock was $22.39 and $20.72 per share, respectively.
The conversion spread value represents the portion of the convertible senior notes that are “in-the-money”, representing the value that would be delivered to investors in shares upon an assumed conversion.
The if-converted values of the 2018 Notes and 2019 Notes exceeded their principal amounts by $26.0 million and $44.3 million, respectively, at June 30, 2017 as the closing market price of the Company’s common stock of $22.39 per share exceeded the implicit conversion prices of $20.92 and $19.82 per share, respectively. However, the if‑converted values of the 2017 Notes and 2023 Notes were less than their principal amounts by $27.0 million and $34.0 million, respectively, at June 30, 2017 as the closing market price of the Company’s common stock was less than the implicit conversion prices of $23.96 and $25.91 per share, respectively.
The Company has asserted its intent and ability to settle the principal amount of the Convertible Notes in cash. As such, only the conversion spread value, if any, is included in the computation of diluted EPS.
Conditions for Conversion
Prior to September 1, 2017 for the 2018 Notes, July 15, 2018 for the 2019 Notes and October 1, 2022 for the 2023 Notes, the Convertible Notes will be convertible only upon satisfaction of one or more of the following conditions: (1) the closing market price of the Company’s common stock is at least 110%, in the case of the 2023 Notes, or 130%, in the case of the 2018 Notes and the 2019 Notes, of the conversion price of the respective Convertible Notes for at least 20 out of 30 trading days prior to the end of the preceding fiscal quarter, (2) the trading price of the Convertible Notes is less than 98% of the product of (i) the conversion rate and (ii) the closing price of the Company’s common stock during any five consecutive trading day period, (3) the Company issues certain equity instruments at less than the 10-day average closing market price of its common stock or the per-share value of certain distributions exceeds the market price of the Company’s common stock by more than 10% or (4) certain other specified corporate events (significant consolidation, sale, merger, share exchange, fundamental change, etc.) occur.
35
On or after September 1, 2017, in the case of the 2018 Notes, July 15, 2018, in the case of the 2019 Notes, and October 1, 2022, in the case of the 2023 Notes, holders may convert each of their Convertible Notes at the applicable conversion rate at any time prior to the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date. On April 15, 2017, the 2017 Notes entered the open conversion period and may be converted at any time through their maturity date of October 15, 2017.
11. Loan Securitization/Sale Activities
As described below, we regularly sell loans and notes under various strategies. We evaluate such sales as to whether they meet the criteria for treatment as a sale—legal isolation, ability of transferee to pledge or exchange the transferred assets without constraint, and transfer of control.
Within the Investing and Servicing Segment, we originate commercial mortgage loans with the intent to sell these mortgage loans to VIEs for the purposes of securitization. These VIEs then issue CMBS that are collateralized in part by these assets, as well as other assets transferred to the VIE. In certain instances, we retain a subordinated interest in the VIE and serve as special servicer for the VIE. The following summarizes the fair value and par value of loans sold from our conduit platform, as well as the amount of sale proceeds used in part to repay the outstanding balance of the repurchase agreements associated with these loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (amounts in thousands):
Fair value of loans sold
291,182
Par value of loans sold
272,293
440,857
Repayment of repurchase agreements
206,461
332,979
Within the Lending Segment, we originate or acquire loans and then subsequently sell a portion, which can be in various forms including first mortgages, A-Notes, senior participations and mezzanine loans. Typically, our motivation for entering into these transactions is to effectively create leverage on the subordinated position that we will retain and hold for investment. In certain instances, we continue to service the loan following its sale. The following table summarizes our loans sold and loans transferred as secured borrowings by the Lending Segment net of expenses (amounts in thousands):
Loan Transfers
Loan Transfers Accounted
Accounted for as Secured
for as Sales
Face Amount
Proceeds
23,977
23,394
38,750
122,514
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, gains (losses) recognized by the Lending Segment on sales of loans were not material.
36
12. Derivatives and Hedging Activity
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives
We are exposed to certain risks arising from both our business operations and economic conditions. Refer to Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements included in our Form 10-K for further discussion of our risk management objectives and policies.
Designated Hedges
In connection with our repurchase agreements, we have entered into six outstanding interest rate swaps that have been designated as cash flow hedges of the interest rate risk associated with forecasted interest payments. As of June 30, 2017, the aggregate notional amount of our interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk totaled $50.5 million. Under these agreements, we will pay fixed monthly coupons at fixed rates ranging from 0.60% to 1.52% of the notional amount to the counterparty and receive floating rate LIBOR. Our interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk have maturities ranging from August 2017 to May 2021.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in AOCI and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, we did not recognize any hedge ineffectiveness in earnings.
Amounts reported in AOCI related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the associated variable-rate debt. Over the next 12 months, we estimate that an immaterial amount will be reclassified as a decrease to interest expenses. We are hedging our exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions over a maximum period of 47 months.
Non-designated Hedges
We have entered into a series of forward contracts whereby we agreed to sell an amount of foreign currency for an agreed upon amount of USD at various dates through July 2020. We entered into these forward contracts to economically fix the USD amounts of foreign denominated cash flows expected to be received by us related to certain foreign denominated loan investments and properties.
37
The following table summarizes our non-designated foreign exchange (“Fx”) forwards, interest rate contracts, and credit index instruments as of June 30, 2017 (notional amounts in thousands):
Type of Derivative
Number of Contracts
Aggregate Notional Amount
Notional Currency
Fx contracts – Buy Danish Krone ("DKK")
5,947
DKK
September 2017
Fx contracts – Buy Euros ("EUR")
1,728
EUR
Fx contracts – Buy Norwegian Krone ("NOK")
836
NOK
Fx contracts – Buy Swedish Krona ("SEK")
1,138
SEK
Fx contracts – Sell DKK
5,960
Fx contracts – Sell EUR (1)
49
289,453
August 2017 – June 2020
Fx contracts – Sell Pounds Sterling ("GBP")
133
236,257
GBP
July 2017 – July 2020
Fx contracts – Sell NOK
Fx contracts – Sell SEK
1,317
Interest rate swaps – Paying fixed rates
58
898,640
USD
April 2019 – July 2027
Interest rate swaps – Receiving fixed rates
9,600
July 2017 – May 2027
Interest rate caps
294,000
60,066
June 2018 – October 2021
Interest rate swaption
232,500
November 2017
Credit index instruments
59,000
September 2058 – November 2059
270
Includes 36 Fx contracts entered into to hedge our Euro currency exposure created by our acquisition of the Ireland Portfolio. As of June 30, 2017, these contracts have an aggregate notional amount of €233.6 million and varying maturities through June 2020.
The table below presents the fair value of our derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (amounts in thousands):
Fair Value of Derivatives
in an Asset Position (1) as of
in a Liability Position (2) as of
December 31,
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate swaps
59
56
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts
26,921
26,591
3,484
Foreign exchange contracts
17,786
62,295
8,010
364
1,312
445
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
46,019
89,331
8,044
3,848
Total derivatives
Classified as derivative assets in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Classified as derivative liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.
38
The tables below present the effect of our derivative financial instruments on the condensed consolidated statements of operations and of comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (amounts in thousands):
Gain (Loss)
Reclassified
Recognized
from AOCI
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
in OCI
into Income
in Income
Location of Gain (Loss)
(effective portion)
(ineffective portion)
Recognized in Income
(136)
(88)
48
(30)
(504)
(183)
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income for the
Derivatives Not Designated
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
as Hedging Instruments
(Loss) gain on derivative financial instruments
(7,822)
(7,273)
(6,354)
(25,273)
(29,422)
27,899
(35,164)
21,349
(342)
(373)
(417)
(541)
13. Offsetting Assets and Liabilities
The following tables present the potential effects of netting arrangements on our financial position for financial assets and liabilities within the scope of ASC 210-20, Balance Sheet—Offsetting, which for us are derivative assets and liabilities as well as repurchase agreement liabilities (amounts in thousands):
(iv)
Gross Amounts Not
Offset in the Statement
(ii)
(iii) = (i) - (ii)
of Financial Position
Gross Amounts
Net Amounts
Cash
Offset in the
Presented in
Collateral
Statement of
the Statement of
Financial
Received /
(v) = (iii) - (iv)
Financial Position
Instruments
Pledged
Net Amount
7,613
38,465
438
Repurchase agreements
3,049,874
3,049,436
491
88,870
3,413
2,480,181
2,476,768
39
14. Variable Interest Entities
Investment Securities
As discussed in Note 2, we evaluate all of our investments and other interests in entities for consolidation, including our investments in CMBS and our retained interests in securitization transactions we initiated, all of which are generally considered to be variable interests in VIEs.
Securitization VIEs consolidated in accordance with ASC 810 are structured as pass through entities that receive principal and interest on the underlying collateral and distribute those payments to the certificate holders. The assets and other instruments held by these securitization entities are restricted and can only be used to fulfill the obligations of the entity. Additionally, the obligations of the securitization entities do not have any recourse to the general credit of any other consolidated entities, nor to us as the primary beneficiary. The VIE liabilities initially represent investment securities on our balance sheet (pre-consolidation). Upon consolidation of these VIEs, our associated investment securities are eliminated, as is the interest income related to those securities. Similarly, the fees we earn in our roles as special servicer of the bonds issued by the consolidated VIEs or as collateral administrator of the consolidated VIEs are also eliminated. Finally, an allocable portion of the identified servicing intangible associated with the eliminated fee streams is eliminated in consolidation.
VIEs in which we are the Primary Beneficiary
The inclusion of the assets and liabilities of securitization VIEs in which we are deemed the primary beneficiary has no economic effect on us. Our exposure to the obligations of securitization VIEs is generally limited to our investment in these entities. We are not obligated to provide, nor have we provided, any financial support for any of these consolidated structures.
We also hold controlling interests in certain other entities that are considered VIEs, which were established to facilitate the purchase of certain properties acquired with third party minority interest partners. We are the primary beneficiaries of these VIEs as we possess both the power to direct the activities of the VIEs that most significantly impact their economic performance and hold significant economic interests. These VIEs had assets of $179.3 million and liabilities of $117.7 million as of June 30, 2017.
VIEs in which we are not the Primary Beneficiary
In certain instances, we hold a variable interest in a VIE in the form of CMBS, but either (i) we are not appointed, or do not serve as, special servicer or (ii) an unrelated third party has the rights to unilaterally remove us as special servicer without cause. In these instances, we do not have the power to direct activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance. In other cases, the variable interest we hold does not obligate us to absorb losses or provide us with the right to receive benefits from the VIE which could potentially be significant. For these structures, we are not deemed to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE, and we do not consolidate these VIEs.
As of June 30, 2017, two of our CDO structures were in default, one of which entered default during the three months ended June 30, 2017. Pursuant to the underlying indentures, the rights of the variable interest holders change upon default of a CDO such that the trustee or senior note holders are allowed to exercise certain rights, including liquidation of the collateral, which at that time, is the activity which would most significantly impact the CDO’s economic performance. Further, when the CDO is in default, the collateral administrator no longer has the option to purchase securities from the CDO. In cases where the CDO is in default and we do not have the ability to exercise rights which would most significantly impact the CDO’s economic performance, we do not consolidate the VIE. During the quarter ended June 30, 2017, we deconsolidated the CDO that went into default, resulting in a reduction to each of VIE assets and VIE liabilities of $467.1 million. The carrying value of our investment in this CDO was zero at the time of deconsolidation and at June 30, 2017. As of June 30, 2017, neither of these CDO structures were consolidated.
As noted above, we are not obligated to provide, nor have we provided, any financial support for any of our securitization VIEs, whether or not we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary. As such, the risk associated with our
40
involvement in these VIEs is limited to the carrying value of our investment in the entity. As of June 30, 2017, our maximum risk of loss related to securitization VIEs in which we were not the primary beneficiary was $13.8 million on a fair value basis.
As of June 30, 2017, the securitization VIEs which we do not consolidate had debt obligations to beneficial interest holders with unpaid principal balances of $5.7 billion. The corresponding assets are comprised primarily of commercial mortgage loans with unpaid principal balances corresponding to the amounts of the outstanding debt obligations.
We also hold passive non-controlling interests in certain unconsolidated entities that are considered VIEs. We are not the primary beneficiaries of these VIEs as we do not possess the power to direct the activities of the VIEs that most significantly impact their economic performance and therefore report our interests, which totaled $137.0 million as of June 30, 2017, within investment in unconsolidated entities on our condensed consolidated balance sheet. Our maximum risk of loss is limited to our carrying value of the investments of $137.0 million plus $15.5 million of unfunded commitments related to one of these VIEs.
15. Related-Party Transactions
Management Agreement
We are party to a management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with our Manager. Under the Management Agreement, our Manager, subject to the oversight of our board of directors, is required to manage our day to day activities, for which our Manager receives a base management fee and is eligible for an incentive fee and stock awards. Our Manager’s personnel perform certain due diligence, legal, management and other services that outside professionals or consultants would otherwise perform. As such, in accordance with the terms of our Management Agreement, our Manager is paid or reimbursed for the documented costs of performing such tasks, provided that such costs and reimbursements are in amounts no greater than those which would be payable to outside professionals or consultants engaged to perform such services pursuant to agreements negotiated on an arm’s-length basis. Refer to Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements included in our Form 10-K for further discussion of this agreement.
Base Management Fee. For the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, approximately $16.9 million and $15.1 million, respectively, was incurred for base management fees. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, approximately $33.8 million and $30.2 million, respectively, was incurred for base management fees. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were $16.9 million and $15.7 million, respectively, of unpaid base management fees included in related-party payable in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Incentive Fee. For the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, approximately $4.3 million and $2.9 million, respectively, was incurred for incentive fees. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, approximately $9.8 million and $7.5 million, respectively, was incurred for incentive fees. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, approximately $4.3 million and $19.0 million, respectively, of unpaid incentive fees were included in related-party payable in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Expense Reimbursement. For the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, approximately $1.3 million and $1.5 million, respectively, was incurred for executive compensation and other reimbursable expenses and recognized within general and administrative expenses in our condensed consolidated statements of operations. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, approximately $2.8 million and $2.6 million, respectively, was incurred for executive compensation and other reimbursable expenses. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, approximately $1.5 million and $3.0 million, respectively, of unpaid reimbursable executive compensation and other expenses were included in related-party payable in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Equity Awards. In certain instances, we issue RSAs to certain employees of affiliates of our Manager who perform services for us. During the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, there were no RSAs granted. Expenses related to the vesting of awards to employees of affiliates of our Manager were $0.8 million and $0.6 million during the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and are reflected in general and administrative expenses in our
41
condensed consolidated statements of operations. During the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, we granted 138,264 and 169,104 RSAs, respectively, at grant date fair values of $3.1 million and $3.3 million, respectively. Expenses related to the vesting of awards to employees of affiliates of our Manager were $1.4 million and $1.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. These shares generally vest over a three-year period.
Manager Equity Plan
In March 2017, we granted 1,000,000 RSUs to our Manager under the Starwood Property Trust, Inc. Manager Equity Plan (“Manager Equity Plan”). In May 2015, we granted 675,000 RSUs to our Manager under the Manager Equity Plan. In connection with these grants and prior similar grants, we recognized share-based compensation expense of $2.9 million and $5.3 million within management fees in our condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, we recognized $4.4 million and $10.1 million, respectively, related to these awards. Refer to Note 16 for further discussion of these grants.
In May 2017, the Company’s shareholders approved the Starwood Property Trust, Inc. 2017 Manager Equity Plan (the “2017 Manager Equity Plan”) which replaces the Manager Equity Plan. Refer to Note 16 for further discussion.
Investments in Loans and Securities
In March 2017, we were fully repaid $59.0 million upon the maturity of a subordinate single-borrower CMBS that we acquired in March 2015. The bond was secured by 85 U.S. hotel properties, and the borrower was an affiliate of Starwood Distressed Opportunity Fund IX, an affiliate of our Manager.
In May 2017, our conduit business acquired certain commercial real estate loans from an unaffiliated third party for an aggregate purchase price of $50.0 million. The underlying borrowers are affiliates of our Manager. Of the $50.0 million, which was included within loans held-for-sale in our condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2017, $15.0 million was sold subsequent to June 30, 2017, and the remaining $35.0 million is expected to be sold later this year into securitization transactions.
In June 2017, we amended a £75.0 million first mortgage for the development of a three-property mixed use portfolio located in Greater London, which we co-originated with SEREF, an affiliate of our Manager, in 2016. The amendment reduced the first mortgage’s total commitment to £69.3 million, of which our share is £55.4 million. The loan matures in June 2019.
Acquisitions from Consolidated CMBS Trusts
Our Investing and Servicing Segment acquires interests in properties for its REO Portfolio from CMBS trusts, some of which are consolidated as VIEs on our balance sheet. Acquisitions from consolidated VIEs are reflected as repayment of debt of consolidated VIEs in our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. During the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, we acquired $19.7 million and $60.5 million, respectively, of net real estate assets from consolidated CMBS trusts. During the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, we acquired $19.7 million and $85.1 million, respectively, of net real estate assets from consolidated CMBS trusts. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, we issued non-controlling interests of $2.4 million and $5.5 million, respectively, in connection with these acquisitions. No non-controlling interests were issued during the six months ended June 30, 2017. Refer to Note 3 for further discussion of these acquisitions.
Refer to Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements included in our Form 10-K for further discussion of related-party agreements.
42
16. Stockholders’ Equity
During the six months ended June 30, 2017, our board of directors declared the following dividends:
Declaration Date
Record Date
Ex-Dividend Date
Payment Date
Frequency
5/9/17
6/30/17
6/28/17
7/14/17
0.48
Quarterly
2/23/17
3/31/17
3/29/17
4/14/17
During the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, there were no shares issued under our At-The-Market Equity Offering Sales Agreement. During the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, shares issued under the Starwood Property Trust, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Stock Purchase Plan (the “DRIP Plan”) were not material.
In February 2017, our board of directors extended the term of our $500.0 million common stock and Convertible Note repurchase program through January 2019. Refer to Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements included in our Form 10-K for further information regarding the repurchase program. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, we repurchased 1,052,889 shares of common stock for $19.7 million and no Convertible Notes under our repurchase program. There were no share repurchases or Convertible Note repurchases under the repurchase program during the six months ended June 30, 2017. The repurchase of the 2018 Notes discussed in Note 10 was not considered part of the repurchase program and therefore does not reduce our available capacity for future repurchases under the repurchase program. As of June 30, 2017, we had $262.2 million of remaining capacity to repurchase common stock and/or Convertible Notes under the repurchase program through January 2019.
Equity Incentive Plans
In May 2017, the Company’s shareholders approved the 2017 Manager Equity Plan and the Starwood Property Trust, Inc. 2017 Equity Plan (the “2017 Equity Plan”), which allow for the issuance of up to 11,000,000 stock options, stock appreciation rights, RSAs, RSUs or other equity-based awards or any combination thereof to the Manager, directors, employees, consultants or any other party providing services to the Company. The 2017 Manager Equity Plan succeeds and replaces the Manager Equity Plan and the 2017 Equity Plan succeeds and replaces the Starwood Property Trust, Inc. Equity Plan (the “Equity Plan”) and the Starwood Property Trust, Inc. Non-Executive Director Stock Plan (the “Non-Executive Director Stock Plan”).
The table below summarizes our share awards granted or vested under the Manager Equity Plan and 2017 Manager Equity Plan during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (dollar amounts in thousands):
Grant Date
Type
Amount Granted
Grant Date Fair Value
Vesting Period
March 2017
RSU
1,000,000
22,240
3 years
May 2015
675,000
16,511
January 2014
489,281
14,776
2,000,000
55,420
As of June 30, 2017, there were 11.0 million shares available for future grants under the 2017 Manager Equity Plan and the 2017 Equity Plan.
43
Schedule of Non-Vested Shares and Share Equivalents (1)
Weighted Average
Manager
Grant Date Fair
Equity Plan
Value (per share)
539,124
281,250
820,374
22.34
Granted
548,160
1,548,160
22.27
Vested
(178,136)
(195,833)
(373,969)
22.06
Forfeited
(34,531)
22.56
874,617
1,085,417
1,960,034
22.30
Equity-based award activity for awards granted under the Equity Plan and Non-Executive Director Stock Plan is reflected within the 2017 Equity Plan column, and for awards granted under the Manager Equity Plan, within the 2017 Manager Equity Plan column.
17. Earnings per Share
The following table provides a reconciliation of net income and the number of shares of common stock used in the computation of basic EPS and diluted EPS (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):
Basic Earnings
Income attributable to STWD common stockholders
Less: Income attributable to participating shares
(828)
(580)
(1,728)
(1,287)
Basic earnings
116,552
110,893
218,010
136,843
Diluted Earnings
Basic — Income attributable to STWD common stockholders
Add: Undistributed earnings to participating shares
Less: Undistributed earnings reallocated to participating shares
Diluted earnings
Number of Shares:
Basic — Average shares outstanding
237,060
236,808
Effect of dilutive securities — Convertible Notes
Effect of dilutive securities — Contingently issuable shares
70
Effect of dilutive securities — Unvested non-participating shares
141
104
Diluted — Average shares outstanding
262,851
237,597
262,564
237,367
Earnings Per Share Attributable to STWD Common Stockholders:
0.45
0.47
0.84
0.58
0.44
0.83
As of June 30, 2017 and 2016, participating shares of 1.7 million and 1.2 million, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted shares as their effect was already considered under the more dilutive two-class method used above.
Additionally, as of June 30, 2017, there were 61.7 million potential shares of common stock contingently issuable upon the conversion of the Convertible Notes. The Company has asserted its intent and ability to settle the principal amount of the Convertible Notes in cash. As a result, this principal amount, representing 58.6 million shares at June 30, 2017, was not included in the computation of diluted EPS. However, as discussed in Note 10, the conversion
44
options associated with the 2018 Notes and 2019 Notes are “in-the-money” as the if-converted values of the 2018 Notes and 2019 Notes exceeded their principal amounts by $26.0 million and $44.3 million, respectively, at June 30, 2017. The dilutive effect to EPS is determined by dividing this “conversion spread value” by the average share price. The “conversion spread value” is the value that would be delivered to investors in shares based on the terms of the Convertible Notes, upon an assumed conversion. In calculating the dilutive effect of these shares, the treasury stock method was used and resulted in a dilution of 3.1 million shares for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017. The conversion options associated with the 2017 Notes and 2023 Notes are “out-of-the-money” because the if-converted values of the 2017 Notes and 2023 Notes were less than their principal amounts by $27.0 million and $34.0 million, respectively, at June 30, 2017; therefore, there was no dilutive effect to EPS for the 2017 Notes and 2023 Notes.
18. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
The changes in AOCI by component are as follows (amounts in thousands):
Cumulative
Unrealized Gain
Effective Portion of
(Loss) on
Foreign
Cumulative Loss on
Available-for-
Currency
Cash Flow Hedges
Sale Securities
Translation
Balance at April 1, 2017
50
46,775
(6,758)
40,067
OCI before reclassifications
4,917
15,923
Amounts reclassified from AOCI
(10)
(9)
Net period OCI
Balance at June 30, 2017
52
4,247
Balance at April 1, 2016
(338)
33,907
(112)
33,457
(918)
88
Balance at June 30, 2016
(386)
39,858
(6,845)
Balance at January 1, 2017
(26)
(8,765)
6,848
19,908
(95)
(65)
Balance at January 1, 2016
37,307
(7,513)
2,715
183
45
The reclassifications out of AOCI impacted the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 as follows (amounts in thousands):
Amounts Reclassified from
AOCI during the Three Months
AOCI during the Six Months
Affected Line Item
Ended June 30,
in the Statements
Details about AOCI Components
of Operations
Losses on cash flow hedges:
Unrealized gains on
available-for-sale securities:
Interest realized upon
collection
95
Total reclassifications for the period
65
19. Fair Value
GAAP establishes a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on the observability of inputs utilized in measuring financial assets and liabilities at fair value. GAAP establishes market-based or observable inputs as the preferred source of values, followed by valuation models using management assumptions in the absence of market inputs. The three levels of the hierarchy are described below:
Level I—Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.
Level II—Inputs (other than quoted prices included in Level I) are either directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability through correlation with market data at the measurement date and for the duration of the instrument’s anticipated life.
Level III—Inputs reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. Consideration is given to the risk inherent in the valuation technique and the risk inherent in the inputs to the model.
Valuation Process
We have valuation control processes in place to validate the fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value including those derived from pricing models. These control processes are designed to assure that the values used for financial reporting are based on observable inputs wherever possible. Refer to Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements included in our Form 10-K for further discussion of our valuation process.
We determine the fair value of our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis in accordance with the methodology described in our Form 10-K.
46
Fair Value Disclosures
The following tables present our financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value on a recurring basis in the condensed consolidated balance sheets by their level in the fair value hierarchy as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (amounts in thousands):
Level I
Level II
Level III
Financial Assets:
13,848
Equity security
Domestic servicing rights
VIE assets
54,880,689
54,821,724
Financial Liabilities:
VIE liabilities
50,699,445
2,164,593
52,872,089
50,707,496
31,546
67,628,621
67,527,083
63,545,223
2,585,369
66,134,496
63,549,127
47
The changes in financial assets and liabilities classified as Level III are as follows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (amounts in thousands):
VIE
Held‑for‑sale
VIE Assets
Liabilities
April 1, 2017 balance
340,266
249,419
15,472
46,649
60,185,851
(2,161,295)
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):
Included in earnings:
Change in fair value / gain on sale
(2,343)
(5,702,684)
213,503
(5,484,119)
Net accretion
3,302
Included in OCI
Purchases / Originations
557,068
564,501
(700)
(291,882)
Issuances
(5,429)
Cash repayments / receipts
(11,442)
(8,555)
(1,322)
(5,240)
(26,559)
Transfers into Level III
(319,457)
Transfers out of Level III
34,288
Consolidation of VIEs
Deconsolidation of VIEs
2,741
(580,452)
79,037
(498,674)
June 30, 2017 balance
(2,164,593)
52,657,131
Amount of total gains (losses) included in earnings attributable to assets still held at June 30, 2017
(3,291)
3,186
396
(5,496,891)
April 1, 2016 balance
154,225
210,898
96,724
95,492
85,115,662
(3,038,534)
82,634,467
1,349
(4,250,779)
57,477
(4,190,909)
3,742
288,186
359,455
(218,369)
(1,269)
(219,638)
(171)
(16,197)
(7,142)
14,922
(8,588)
(557,543)
35,759
1,746,946
(53,252)
1,693,694
275
(2,535,712)
519
(2,534,918)
June 30, 2016 balance
237,106
251,260
114,340
83,301
80,076,117
(3,540,652)
77,221,472
Amount of total gains (losses) included in earnings attributable to assets still held at June 30, 2016
1,810
2,208
(4,197,733)
January 1, 2017 balance
(2,585,369)
64,941,714
(3,686)
(12,239,909)
598,484
(11,635,546)
7,188
1,002,955
1,010,388
(470,478)
(11,134)
(481,612)
(10,188)
(11,639)
(18,783)
(7,088)
(36,036)
(73,546)
(383,427)
163,740
4,210
(2,108,589)
88,203
(2,016,176)
Amount of total (losses) gains included in earnings attributable to assets still held at June 30, 2017
6,973
228
(11,653,949)
January 1, 2016 balance
203,865
176,224
212,981
119,698
76,675,689
(2,552,448)
74,836,009
Impact of ASU 2015-02 adoption (1)
(17,467)
17,467
2,316
(8,340,280)
293,600
(8,043,168)
7,157
488,756
634,668
(475,333)
(476,602)
(596)
(308)
(23,008)
(19,445)
20,772
(21,989)
(972,587)
146,724
(138,342)
(483,905)
16,227,974
523
(5,126,980)
7,788
(5,118,669)
3,778
(8,052,865)
Our implementation of ASU 2015-02 resulted in the consolidation of certain CMBS trusts effective January 1, 2016, which required the elimination of $17.5 million of domestic servicing rights associated with these newly consolidated trusts.
Amounts were transferred from Level II to Level III due to a decrease in the observable relevant market activity and amounts were transferred from Level III to Level II due to an increase in the observable relevant market activity.
The following table presents the fair values, all of which are classified in Level III of the fair value hierarchy, of our financial instruments not carried at fair value on the condensed consolidated balance sheets (amounts in thousands):
Fair
Financial assets not carried at fair value:
Loans held-for-investment and loans transferred as secured borrowings
6,300,054
5,882,995
5,934,219
HTM securities
Financial liabilities not carried at fair value:
Secured financing agreements and secured borrowings on transferred loans
4,739,010
4,189,126
4,198,136
Unsecured senior notes
2,113,480
2,088,374
The following is quantitative information about significant unobservable inputs in our Level III measurements for those assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (dollars in thousands):
Valuation
Unobservable
Range as of (1)
Technique
Input
Discounted cash flow
Yield (b)
4.5% - 5.8%
5.0% - 5.7%
Duration (c)
2.7 - 12.3 years
10.0 years
Constant prepayment rate (a)
2.6% - 20.5%
2.8% - 17.0%
Constant default rate (b)
0.9% - 5.9%
1.1% - 8.1%
Loss severity (b)
18% - 79% (e)
12% - 79% (e)
Delinquency rate (c)
4% - 32%
2% - 29%
Servicer advances (a)
20% - 83%
23% - 94%
Annual coupon deterioration (b)
0% - 1.0%
0% - 0.6%
Putback amount per projected total collateral loss (d)
0% - 15%
0% - 565.0%
0% - 172.0%
0 - 8.7 years
0 - 18.7 years
Debt yield (a)
7.75%
Discount rate (b)
15%
Control migration (b)
0% - 80%
0% - 587.7%
0% - 960.4%
0 - 12.6 years
0 - 12.0 years
The ranges of significant unobservable inputs are represented in percentages and years.
Sensitivity of the Fair Value to Changes in the Unobservable Inputs
Significant increase (decrease) in the unobservable input in isolation would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement.
Significant increase (decrease) in the unobservable input in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement.
Significant increase (decrease) in the unobservable input in isolation would result in either a significantly lower or higher (higher or lower) fair value measurement depending on the structural features of the security in question.
Any delay in the putback recovery date leads to a decrease in fair value for the majority of securities in our RMBS portfolio.
86% and 57% of the portfolio falls within a range of 45%-80% as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
20. Income Taxes
Certain of our subsidiaries have elected to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”). TRSs permit us to participate in certain activities from which REITs are generally precluded, as long as these activities meet specific criteria, are conducted within the parameters of certain limitations established by the Code, and are conducted in entities which elect to be treated as taxable subsidiaries under the Code. To the extent these criteria are met, we will continue to maintain our qualification as a REIT.
Our TRSs engage in various real estate related operations, including special servicing of commercial real estate, originating and securitizing commercial mortgage loans, and investing in entities which engage in real estate related operations. The majority of our TRSs are held within the Investing and Servicing Segment. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, approximately $807.6 million and $634.4 million, respectively, of the Investing and Servicing Segment’s assets, including $81.7 million and $181.0 million in cash, respectively, were owned by TRS entities. Our TRSs are not consolidated for U.S. federal income tax purposes, but are instead taxed as corporations. For financial reporting purposes, a provision for current and deferred taxes is established for the portion of earnings recognized by us with respect to our interest in TRSs.
The following table is a reconciliation of our U.S. federal income tax determined using our statutory federal tax rate to our reported income tax (benefit) provision for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (dollars in thousands):
Federal statutory tax rate
46,439
35.0
39,472
82,094
48,971
REIT and other non-taxable income
(37,000)
(27.9)
(39,171)
(34.7)
(73,425)
(31.2)
(48,135)
(34.4)
State income taxes
72
0.1
(119)
(0.1)
(23)
Federal benefit of state tax deduction
(7)
(25)
Valuation allowance
358
0.3
(123)
(21)
Effective tax rate
9,452
7.1
706
0.6
8,469
3.6
800
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, we recognized $25.7 million in earnings from unconsolidated entities related to our interest in an investor entity which owns equity in an online real estate company (see Note 7). Our investment in this entity is held within a TRS. In calculating our effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, these earnings were deemed to be both unusual in nature and infrequent in occurrence. As a result, pursuant to ASC 740, the income tax effect of these earnings was excluded from ordinary income and discretely calculated. This calculation resulted in a deferred income tax provision of $9.9 million, which is included within income tax provision in our condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.
21. Commitments and Contingencies
As of June 30, 2017, we had future funding commitments on 55 loans totaling $1.6 billion, of which we expect to fund $1.4 billion. These future funding commitments primarily relate to construction projects, capital improvements, tenant improvements and leasing commissions. Generally, funding commitments are subject to certain conditions that must be met, such as customary construction draw certifications, minimum debt service coverage ratios or executions of new leases before advances are made to the borrower.
Management is not aware of any other contractual obligations, legal proceedings, or any other contingent obligations incurred in the normal course of business that would have a material adverse effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
51
22. Segment Data
In its operation of the business, management, including our chief operating decision maker, who is our Chief Executive Officer, reviews certain financial information, including segmented internal profit and loss statements prepared on a basis prior to the impact of consolidating securitization VIEs under ASC 810. The segment information within this note is reported on that basis.
The table below presents our results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2017 by business segment (amounts in thousands):
Investing
Lending
and Servicing
Segment
Corporate
Subtotal
VIEs
116,993
3,619
11,611
38,192
49,803
(37,433)
216
33,663
33,879
(15,251)
12,687
46,279
293
545
221
1,059
(66)
129,113
88,706
46,500
264,319
(52,750)
469
24,096
24,583
24,486
4,856
10,899
31,351
71,592
(275)
5,359
22,789
1,000
3,298
32,446
74
385
53
99
5,232
17,792
4,737
17,279
176
(34)
28,021
37,861
47,035
58,745
171,662
(151)
Income (loss) before other income (loss), income taxes and non-controlling interests
101,092
50,845
(535)
(58,745)
92,657
(52,599)
(13,667)
5,666
(149)
12,256
12,107
(14,600)
(152)
15,558
1,230
35,892
2,488
39,610
(10,145)
(Loss) gain on sale of investments and other assets, net
5,109
77
Loss on derivative financial instruments, net
(14,926)
(2,179)
(20,481)
Foreign currency gain, net
12,882
704
(613)
(1,227)
53,684
(17,899)
34,558
58,069
Income (loss) before income taxes
99,865
104,529
(18,434)
127,215
5,470
(127)
(9,325)
Net income (loss)
99,738
95,204
117,763
(353)
(383)
(5,470)
Net income (loss) attributable to Starwood Property Trust, Inc.
99,385
95,174
The table below presents our results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2016 by business segment (amounts in thousands):
119,296
3,261
11,046
32,435
43,481
(28,180)
206
37,249
37,455
(14,143)
8,223
29,620
1,076
1,152
(173)
130,606
82,244
29,638
242,488
(42,496)
395
23,304
23,711
22,572
3,328
5,678
26,057
4,540
26,721
837
3,130
35,228
181
942
780
166
3,661
12,191
3,730
15,343
30,478
38,232
34,215
53,491
156,416
237
100,128
44,012
(4,577)
(53,491)
86,072
(42,733)
(11,034)
(1,157)
7,459
7,429
(6,110)
1,224
1,286
2,429
4,939
(460)
Loss on sale of investments and other assets, net
Gain (loss) on derivative financial instruments, net
15,868
(3,945)
8,330
Foreign currency (loss) gain, net
(17,840)
870
(18)
8,680
(868)
7,905
19,421
26,458
42,980
99,260
51,917
14,844
112,530
247
51,211
111,824
(348)
(351)
(247)
98,912
51,208
The table below presents our results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017 by business segment (amounts in thousands):
226,039
6,456
24,330
73,028
97,358
(69,764)
426
63,744
64,170
(31,440)
24,876
91,132
372
1,009
266
1,647
(185)
251,167
169,113
91,398
511,678
(101,389)
923
47,958
48,917
44,443
9,214
21,106
62,958
137,721
(544)
9,570
45,369
2,381
5,468
62,788
161
271
10,719
33,183
9,791
34,436
934
52,870
76,100
91,343
116,384
336,697
(283)
198,297
93,013
55
(116,384)
174,981
(101,106)
(23,304)
6,870
31,301
31,324
(34,988)
26,151
1,700
36,909
4,949
43,558
(11,106)
(59)
(19,461)
(1,482)
(20,992)
17,745
1,069
(313)
75,765
(15,949)
53,587
107,094
197,984
168,778
(15,894)
(122,300)
228,568
5,988
(8,127)
197,642
160,651
220,099
Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests
(707)
346
(361)
(5,988)
196,935
160,997
The table below presents our results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2016 by business segment (amounts in thousands):
233,954
6,135
20,674
80,061
100,735
(66,031)
365
73,467
73,832
(25,829)
14,698
55,822
81
2,418
2,523
(354)
255,074
176,779
55,846
487,699
(92,214)
770
47,832
48,632
98
44,907
6,566
10,627
52,055
8,462
52,015
1,392
5,980
67,849
1,280
1,135
758
6,723
21,784
6,781
31,052
56,687
73,350
65,613
106,867
302,517
198,387
103,429
(9,767)
(106,867)
185,182
(92,670)
(19,704)
774
(244)
(44,069)
(44,313)
46,385
1,692
2,663
4,858
9,213
(669)
Gain on sale of investments and other assets, net
12,842
(15,190)
(2,117)
(19,662)
2,330
9,102
1,550
(5,217)
(53,767)
11,809
(45,625)
93,030
193,170
49,662
2,042
(105,317)
139,557
360
(75)
(725)
193,095
48,937
138,757
(698)
71
(627)
(360)
192,397
49,008
The table below presents our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2017 by business segment (amounts in thousands):
664
36,185
12,744
207,719
257,312
4,582
15,573
14,846
12,880
6,207,067
4,008
318,634
291,482
735,086
285,190
1,675,308
97,727
121,007
218,734
(27,368)
31,261
89,211
248,267
(18,728)
16,538
3,372
26,168
32,866
480
46,365
59,345
58,932
1,768
166,410
(2,762)
VIE assets, at fair value
7,404,054
2,031,434
2,034,834
209,487
11,679,809
52,863,136
23,813
56,451
67,088
23,126
170,478
971
90
22,688
6,742
328
981
2,700,190
550,704
1,227,402
296,327
4,774,623
(23,700)
2,730,745
607,573
1,295,471
2,507,398
7,141,187
52,841,309
2,226,923
861,556
707,726
901,292
Treasury stock
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
51,734
4,402
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
2,383,738
551,915
27,235
(3,109,751)
4,662,395
1,413,316
739,363
(2,297,911)
10,914
10,545
21,459
21,827
4,673,309
1,423,861
4,538,622
57
The table below presents our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 by business segment (amounts in thousands):
7,085
38,798
7,701
560,790
614,374
1,148
17,885
8,202
9,146
5,827,553
20,442
776,072
277,612
1,667,108
125,327
128,159
253,486
(34,238)
30,874
56,376
212,227
(7,622)
45,282
1,186
42,893
25,831
2,393
13,470
59,503
29,569
1,866
104,408
(2,645)
6,779,052
1,784,125
2,009,553
562,656
11,135,386
66,120,880
20,769
68,603
81,873
26,003
197,248
886
440
37,378
3,388
516
2,258,462
426,683
1,196,830
295,851
4,177,826
2,317,619
496,242
1,278,703
2,495,851
6,588,415
66,107,778
2,218,671
883,761
696,049
892,699
44,903
(437)
(8,328)
2,186,727
390,994
43,129
(2,736,429)
4,450,301
1,274,318
730,850
(1,933,195)
11,132
13,565
24,697
13,102
4,461,433
1,287,883
4,546,971
23. Subsequent Events
Our significant events subsequent to June 30, 2017 were as follows:
Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) Membership
In July 2017, we acquired a captive insurance entity that is a member of the FHLB of Chicago. This membership, which expires in February 2021, provides us additional financing capacity from the FHLB of Chicago on qualifying collateral.
Dividend Declaration
On August 9, 2017, our board of directors declared a dividend of $0.48 per share for the third quarter of 2017, which is payable on October 13, 2017 to common stockholders of record as of September 29, 2017.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” should be read in conjunction with the information included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Form 10-K”). This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. See “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” at the beginning of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Overview
Refer to Note 1 of our condensed consolidated financial statements included herein (the “Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements”) for further discussion of our business and organization.
60
Developments During the Second Quarter of 2017
The Lending Segment originated or acquired the following loans during the quarter:
o
$280.0 million first mortgage and mezzanine loan for the refinancing of a 367-room hotel and 11-unit condominium project located in Manhattan’s Lower East Side, of which the Company funded $254.4 million.
$280.0 million first mortgage loan to finance the development of a 36-floor multi-family tower with parking and ground floor retail space located in Brooklyn, New York, of which the Company funded $30.0 million and sold the unfunded $80.0 million subordinated first mortgage.
$175.0 million first mortgage loan to finance the completion of a 2.7 million square foot shopping, entertainment and dining complex located in East Rutherford, New Jersey, of which the Company funded $30.0 million.
$136.1 million first mortgage and mezzanine loan for the acquisition of a 568,000 square foot office tower and parking facility located in Charlotte, North Carolina, of which the Company funded $108.4 million.
Funded $191.8 million of previously originated loan commitments.
Received proceeds of $671.3 million from maturities, sales and principal repayments on loans held-for-investment.
Originated or acquired conduit loans of $416.4 million and received proceeds of $291.2 million from sales.
Recognized $25.7 million of income before taxes from our investment in an entity which owns equity in an online real estate company.
Named special servicer on one new issue CMBS transaction with a total unpaid principal balance of $1.1 billion at issuance.
Acquired commercial real estate from a CMBS trust for a gross purchase price of $19.3 million.
Sold commercial real estate for total proceeds of $18.6 million and recognized a gain of $5.2 million.
61
Developments During the First Quarter of 2017
$250.0 million first mortgage and mezzanine loan for the refinancing and renovation of two adjoined 12-floor office buildings located in Washington, D.C., of which the Company funded $135.7 million.
$223.6 million first mortgage and mezzanine loan for the development of a waterfront residential community located in Glen Cove, New York. The $160.0 million first mortgage was subsequently sold during the quarter.
$175.0 million first mortgage and mezzanine loan for the acquisition of a portfolio of four office buildings located in Tysons Corner, Virginia, of which the Company funded $171.0 million.
$100.0 million first mortgage and mezzanine loan for the acquisition of a 23-building predominantly office property located in Alhambra, California, of which the Company funded $84.5 million.
$73.0 million first mortgage and mezzanine loan for the final stage development of a 347-key full-service hotel and conference center located in Renton, Washington, of which the Company funded $40.0 million.
Funded $141.6 million of previously originated loan commitments.
Received proceeds of $268.0 million from maturities, sales and principal repayments on loans held-for-investment.
Originated or acquired conduit loans of $256.5 million and received proceeds of $179.3 million from sales.
Purchased one new issue B-piece for $57.4 million, representing the first horizontal risk retention deal.
Named special servicer on two new issue CMBS transactions, one of which we retained the related B-piece, with a total unpaid principal balance of $1.7 billion at issuance.
Issued $250.0 million of 4.375% Convertible Senior Notes due 2023 (the “2023 Notes”) and utilized the proceeds to repurchase $230.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 2018 Notes for $250.7 million, recognizing a loss on extinguishment of debt of $5.9 million.
Subsequent Events
Refer to Note 23 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for disclosure regarding significant transactions that occurred subsequent to June 30, 2017.
62
Results of Operations
The discussion below is based on accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and therefore reflects the elimination of certain key financial statement line items related to the consolidation of securitization variable interest entities (“VIEs”), particularly within revenues and other income, as discussed in Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. For a discussion of our results of operations excluding the impact of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 810 as it relates to the consolidation of securitization VIEs, refer to the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section herein.
The following table compares our summarized results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 by business segment (amounts in thousands):
$ Change
Lending Segment
(1,493)
(3,907)
6,462
(7,666)
16,862
35,552
Investing and Servicing VIEs
(10,254)
(9,175)
11,577
14,804
(2,457)
(3,817)
(371)
2,750
12,820
25,730
5,254
9,517
(388)
(739)
14,858
33,441
(359)
4,904
45,779
(37,320)
(27,758)
(7,466)
15,089
14,064
23,189
Income (loss) before income taxes:
605
4,814
52,612
(33,278)
(17,936)
(5,254)
(16,983)
5,223
5,628
94,639
(8,746)
(7,669)
(5,255)
(5,362)
5,907
81,608
63
Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
Revenues
For the three months ended June 30, 2017, revenues of our Lending Segment decreased $1.5 million to $129.1 million, compared to $130.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. This decrease was primarily due to (i) a $2.3 million decrease in interest income from loans principally due to lower levels of prepayment related income during the second quarter of 2017 which exceeded the benefits of increases in LIBOR, partially offset by (ii) a $0.6 million increase in interest income principally from CMBS investments.
Costs and Expenses
For the three months ended June 30, 2017, costs and expenses of our Lending Segment decreased $2.5 million to $28.0 million, compared to $30.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. This decrease was primarily due to a $4.7 million decrease in our loan loss allowance partially offset by a $1.9 million increase in interest expense associated with the various secured financing facilities used to fund a portion of our investment portfolio.
Net Interest Income (amounts in thousands)
Change
(2,303)
565
(24,486)
(22,572)
(1,914)
Net interest income
104,118
107,770
(3,652)
For the three months ended June 30, 2017, net interest income of our Lending Segment decreased $3.7 million to $104.1 million, compared to $107.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. This decrease reflects the net decrease in interest income explained in the Revenues discussion above and the increase in interest expense on our secured financing facilities.
During the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the weighted average unlevered yields on the Lending Segment’s loans and investment securities were 7.0% and 7.2%, respectively. The decrease in the weighted average unlevered yield is primarily due to lower levels of prepayment related income which exceeded the benefits of increases in LIBOR for the three months ended June 30, 2017.
During the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Lending Segment’s weighted average secured borrowing rates, inclusive of interest rate hedging costs and the amortization of deferred financing fees, were 3.9% and 3.4%, respectively, and 3.8% and 3.3%, respectively, excluding the impact of bridge financing. The increases in borrowing rates primarily reflect increases in LIBOR.
Other Loss
For the three months ended June 30, 2017, other loss of our Lending Segment increased $0.3 million to $1.2 million, compared to $0.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The increase was primarily due to unfavorable changes in the fair value of investments accounted for under the fair value option. Also, a $30.8 million unfavorable change in gain (loss) on derivatives was mostly offset by a $30.7 million favorable change in foreign currency gain (loss). The unfavorable change from derivatives reflects a $32.6 million unfavorable change on foreign currency hedges, partially offset by a $1.8 million decreased loss on interest rate swaps. The foreign currency hedges are used to fix the U.S. dollar amounts of cash flows (both interest and principal payments) we expect to receive from our foreign currency denominated loans and CMBS investments. The unfavorable change on the foreign currency hedges and the favorable
64
change in foreign currency gain (loss) reflect the overall weakening of the U.S. dollar against the pound sterling (“GBP”) in the second quarter of 2017 versus a strengthening of the U.S. dollar in the second quarter of 2016. The interest rate swaps are used primarily to fix our interest rate payments on certain variable rate borrowings which fund fixed rate investments.
Investing and Servicing Segment and VIEs
For the three months ended June 30, 2017, revenues of our Investing and Servicing Segment decreased $3.8 million to $35.9 million after consolidated VIE eliminations of $52.8 million, compared to $39.7 million after consolidated VIE eliminations of $42.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The VIE eliminations are merely a function of the number of CMBS trusts consolidated in any given period, and as such, are not a meaningful indicator of the operating results for this segment. The decrease in revenues in the second quarter of 2017 was primarily due to decreases of $4.7 million in servicing fees and $3.5 million in interest income from CMBS investments, partially offset by a $4.5 million increase in rental income on our expanded REO Portfolio (see Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). The $4.7 million decrease in servicing fees is primarily due to the divestiture of our European servicing and advisory business in October 2016. The $3.5 million decrease in CMBS interest income reflects a $9.2 million increase in VIE eliminations related to the CMBS trusts we consolidate. Excluding the effect of these eliminations, CMBS interest income increased by $5.7 million, reflecting a higher level of CMBS interest recoveries from asset liquidations by CMBS trusts.
For the three months ended June 30, 2017, costs and expenses of our Investing and Servicing Segment decreased $0.8 million to $37.7 million, compared to $38.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, inclusive of VIE eliminations which were nominal for both periods. The decrease in costs and expenses was primarily due to a $4.0 million decrease in general and administrative expenses, principally reflecting the divestiture of our European servicing and advisory business, and a $0.7 million decrease in acquisition related costs. These decreases were partially offset by increases of $1.6 million in costs of rental operations, $1.3 million in interest expense and $1.0 million in depreciation and amortization, all principally related to our expanded REO portfolio.
Other Income
For the three months ended June 30, 2017, other income of our Investing and Servicing Segment increased $60.9 million to $111.8 million including additive net VIE eliminations of $58.1 million, from $50.9 million including additive net VIE eliminations of $43.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in other income in the second quarter of 2017 compared to the second quarter of 2016 was primarily due to (i) a $25.7 million increase in earnings from an unconsolidated investor entity which owns equity in an online real estate company (see Note 7 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements), (ii) a $27.1 million increase in the change in value of net assets related to consolidated VIEs, (iii) a $5.1 million gain on a sale of commercial real estate and (iv) a $4.2 million favorable change in the decrease in fair value of servicing rights primarily reflecting the effect of VIE eliminations on the expected amortization of this deteriorating asset net of increases in fair value due to the attainment of new servicing contracts. The change in net assets related to consolidated VIEs reflects amounts associated with the Investing and Servicing Segment’s variable interests in CMBS trusts it consolidates, including special servicing fees, interest income, and changes in fair value of CMBS and servicing rights. As noted above, this number is merely a function of the number of CMBS trusts consolidated in any given period, and as such, is not a meaningful indicator of the operating results for this segment. Before VIE eliminations, there was an increase in fair value of CMBS securities of $20.3 million and $7.5 million in the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Income Tax Provision
Historically, our consolidated income tax provision principally relates to the taxable nature of the Investing and Servicing Segment’s loan servicing and loan conduit businesses which are housed in TRSs. For the three months ended June 30, 2017, we had a tax provision of $9.4 million compared to a provision of $0.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2016. The change primarily reflects an increase in the taxable income of our TRSs associated with earnings
from our interest in an investor entity which owns equity in an online real estate company (see Notes 7 and 20 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).
For the three months ended June 30, 2017, revenues of our Property Segment increased $16.9 million to $46.5 million, compared to $29.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in revenues in the second quarter of 2017 was primarily due to the inclusion of rental income for the Medical Office Portfolio, which was acquired in December 2016 (see Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).
For the three months ended June 30, 2017, costs and expenses of our Property Segment increased $12.8 million to $47.0 million, compared to $34.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in costs and expenses reflects increases of $1.9 million in depreciation and amortization, $5.6 million in other rental related costs and $5.2 million in interest expense, all primarily due to the inclusion of the Medical Office Portfolio acquired in December 2016, partially offset by lower amortization related to the Woodstar Portfolio’s in-place lease intangible asset, which is now fully amortized (see Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).
Other Income (Loss)
For the three months ended June 30, 2017, other income (loss) of our Property Segment decreased $37.3 million to a loss of $17.9 million, compared to income of $19.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease in other income (loss) was primarily due to (i) a $28.8 million unfavorable change in gain (loss) on derivatives primarily related to foreign exchange contracts which economically hedge our Euro currency exposure with respect to the Ireland Portfolio (see Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements) and interest rate swaps which primarily hedge the variable interest rate risk on borrowings secured by our Medical Office Portfolio and (ii) the non-recurrence of an $8.4 million bargain purchase gain recognized on the Woodstar Portfolio in the second quarter of 2016.
For the three months ended June 30, 2017, corporate expenses increased $5.2 million to $58.7 million, compared to $53.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The increase was primarily due to interest expense on our 2021 Senior Notes issued in December 2016, partially offset by a decrease in interest expense on our reduced term loan borrowings.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
For the six months ended June 30, 2017, revenues of our Lending Segment decreased $3.9 million to $251.2 million, compared to $255.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. This decrease was primarily due to (i) a $7.9 million decrease in interest income from loans principally due to lower levels of prepayment related income during the second quarter of 2017 which exceeded the benefits of increases in LIBOR, partially offset by (ii) a $3.7 million increase in interest income principally from CMBS and RMBS investments.
66
For the six months ended June 30, 2017, costs and expenses of our Lending Segment decreased $3.8 million to $52.9 million, compared to $56.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. This decrease was primarily due to a $4.3 million decrease in our loan loss allowance.
(7,915)
3,656
(44,443)
(44,907)
464
205,926
209,721
(3,795)
For the six months ended June 30, 2017, net interest income of our Lending Segment decreased $3.8 million to $205.9 million, compared to $209.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. This decrease reflects the net decrease in interest income explained in the Revenues discussion above, partially offset by a decrease in interest expense on our secured financing facilities.
During the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the weighted average unlevered yields on the Lending Segment’s loans and investment securities were 7.1% and 7.5%, respectively. The decrease in the weighted average unlevered yield is primarily due to lower levels of prepayment related income which exceeded the benefits of increases in LIBOR for the six months ended June 30, 2017.
During the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Lending Segment’s weighted average secured borrowing rates, inclusive of interest rate hedging costs and the amortization of deferred financing fees, were 3.8% and 3.4%, respectively, and 3.6% and 3.3%, respectively, excluding the impact of bridge financing. The increases in borrowing rates primarily reflect increases in LIBOR.
For the six months ended June 30, 2017, other loss of our Lending Segment decreased $4.9 million to $0.3 million, compared to $5.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease was primarily due to a $37.4 million favorable change in foreign currency gain (loss), partially offset by a $32.3 million unfavorable change in gain (loss) on derivatives. The unfavorable change from derivatives reflects a $40.6 million unfavorable change on foreign currency hedges, partially offset by an $8.3 million decreased loss on interest rate swaps. The foreign currency hedges are used to fix the U.S. dollar amounts of cash flows (both interest and principal payments) we expect to receive from our foreign currency denominated loans and CMBS investments. The favorable change in foreign currency gain (loss) and the unfavorable change on the foreign currency hedges reflect the overall weakening of the U.S. dollar against the pound sterling (“GBP”) in the six months of 2017 versus a strengthening of the U.S. dollar in the six months of 2016. The interest rate swaps are used primarily to fix our interest rate payments on certain variable rate borrowings which fund fixed rate investments.
For the six months ended June 30, 2017, revenues of our Investing and Servicing Segment decreased $16.9 million to $67.7 million after consolidated VIE eliminations of $101.4 million, compared to $84.6 million after consolidated VIE eliminations of $92.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The VIE eliminations are merely a function of the number of CMBS trusts consolidated in any given period, and as such, are not a meaningful indicator of the operating results for this segment. The decrease in revenues in the six months of 2017 was primarily due to
67
decreases of $15.3 million in servicing fees and $10.8 million in interest income from CMBS investments, partially offset by a $10.2 million increase in rental income on our expanded REO Portfolio. The $15.3 million decrease in servicing fees is primarily due to the divestiture of our European servicing and advisory business in October 2016 and an increase in VIE eliminations. The $10.8 million decrease in CMBS interest income reflects a $3.8 million increase in VIE eliminations related to the CMBS trusts we consolidate. Excluding the effect of these eliminations, CMBS interest income decreased by $7.0 million, reflecting a lower level of CMBS interest recoveries from asset liquidations by CMBS trusts.
For the six months ended June 30, 2017, costs and expenses of our Investing and Servicing Segment increased $2.0 million to $75.8 million, compared to $73.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, inclusive of VIE eliminations which were nominal for both periods. The increase in costs and expenses was primarily due to increases of $4.0 million in costs of rental operations, $3.0 million in depreciation and amortization and $2.1 million in interest expense, all primarily related to our expanded REO portfolio, partially offset by a $6.8 million decrease in general and administrative expenses principally reflecting the divestiture of our European servicing and advisory business.
For the six months ended June 30, 2017, other income of our Investing and Servicing Segment increased $143.6 million to $182.9 million including additive net VIE eliminations of $107.1 million, from $39.3 million including additive net VIE eliminations of $93.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in other income in the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016 was primarily due to (i) a $25.7 million increase in earnings from an unconsolidated investor entity which owns equity in an online real estate company (see Note 7 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements), (ii) a $100.4 million increase in the change in value of net assets related to consolidated VIEs and (iii) a $13.7 million decrease in loss on derivatives which principally hedge our interest rate risk on conduit loans. The change in net assets related to consolidated VIEs reflects amounts associated with the Investing and Servicing Segment’s variable interests in CMBS trusts it consolidates, including special servicing fees, interest income, and changes in fair value of CMBS and servicing rights. As noted above, this number is merely a function of the number of CMBS trusts consolidated in any given period, and as such, is not a meaningful indicator of the operating results for this segment. Before VIE eliminations, there was an increase in fair value of CMBS securities of $40.3 million and a decrease of $44.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Historically, our consolidated income tax provision principally relates to the taxable nature of the Investing and Servicing Segment’s loan servicing and loan conduit businesses which are housed in TRSs. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, we had a tax provision of $8.5 million compared to a provision of $0.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2016. The change primarily reflects an increase in the taxable income of our TRSs associated with earnings from our interest in an investor entity which owns equity in an online real estate company (see Notes 7 and 20 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).
For the six months ended June 30, 2017, revenues of our Property Segment increased $35.6 million to $91.4 million, compared to $55.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in revenues in the six months ended June 30, 2017 was primarily due to the full period inclusion of rental income for the Medical Office Portfolio, which was acquired in December 2016, and the Woodstar Portfolio, which was acquired over a period from October 2015 through April 2016.
68
For the six months ended June 30, 2017, costs and expenses of our Property Segment increased $25.7 million to $91.3 million, compared to $65.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in costs and expenses reflects increases of $3.4 million in depreciation and amortization, $11.4 million in other rental related costs and $10.5 million in interest expense, all primarily due to the full period inclusion of the Medical Office and Woodstar Portfolios, partially offset by lower amortization related to the Woodstar Portfolio’s in-place lease intangible asset, which is now fully amortized.
For the six months ended June 30, 2017, other income (loss) of our Property Segment decreased $27.7 million to a loss of $15.9 million, compared to income of $11.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease in other income (loss) was primarily due to (i) an $18.9 million increased loss on derivatives primarily related to foreign exchange contracts which economically hedge our Euro currency exposure with respect to the Ireland Portfolio and interest rate swaps which primarily hedge the variable interest rate risk on borrowings secured by our Medical Office Portfolio and (ii) the non-recurrence of an $8.4 million bargain purchase gain recognized on the Woodstar Portfolio in the second quarter of 2016.
For the six months ended June 30, 2017, corporate expenses increased $9.5 million to $116.4 million, compared to $106.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The increase was primarily due to interest expense on our 2021 Senior Notes issued in December 2016, partially offset by a decrease in interest expense on our reduced term loan borrowings.
For the six months ended June 30, 2017, corporate other loss was $5.9 million, compared to income of $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. Corporate other loss of $5.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2017 represents a loss on repurchase of $230.0 million of our 2018 Convertible Notes (see Note 10 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). Corporate other income of $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 represents a reimbursement received related to a partnership guarantee arrangement.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Core Earnings is a non-GAAP financial measure. We calculate Core Earnings as GAAP net income (loss) excluding the following:
non-cash equity compensation expense;
incentive fees due under our management agreement;
(iii)
depreciation and amortization of real estate and associated intangibles;
acquisition costs associated with successful acquisitions; and
(v)
any unrealized gains, losses or other non-cash items recorded in net income for the period, regardless of whether such items are included in other comprehensive income or loss, or in net income.
While there was no change to the definition of Core Earnings during the three months ended June 30, 2017, we deviated from our historical practice of treating the entirety of our income tax provision, including both the current and
69
deferred portions, as Core Earnings. Although the deferred portion of our income tax provision is non-cash, we have historically included it in Core Earnings because it will ultimately become cash, and the amounts have historically not been significant enough to warrant an adjustment to Core Earnings for this timing mismatch. However, during the three months ended June 30, 2017, we recognized $25.7 million in earnings from unconsolidated entities related to one of our investments, along with a corresponding deferred tax provision of $9.9 million (see Notes 7 and 20 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). Pursuant to the criteria in ASC 740 which governs the calculation of the annual effective tax rate for an interim period, the income tax effect of items that are unusual in nature or infrequent in occurrence should be excluded from ordinary income and discretely calculated. As described in Note 20 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, the earnings we recognized from our interest in an investor entity which owns equity in an online real estate company qualified for treatment as a discrete item. Through an analogy to this guidance, and consistent with the definition of Core Earnings which excludes non-cash items, we excluded the $9.9 million deferred tax provision from Core Earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017. Going forward, we will likewise exclude from Core Earnings any deferred income taxes for transactions which are deemed to be either unusual in nature or infrequent in occurrence, as such terms are utilized in ASC 740, until such time as the tax provision related to the discrete item becomes current.
The repurchase of our 2018 Notes in March 2017 was considered to be an unrealized event for Core Earnings purposes because the 2018 Notes were effectively exchanged for the 2023 Notes, thereby simply extending the term of this debt. As such, consistent with the above definition, we have deferred the $5.9 million GAAP loss on extinguishment of debt included in our GAAP results for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and will amortize this loss over the term of our 2023 Notes.
We believe that Core Earnings provides an additional measure of our core operating performance by eliminating the impact of certain non-cash expenses and facilitating a comparison of our financial results to those of other comparable REITs with fewer or no non-cash adjustments and comparison of our own operating results from period to period. Our management uses Core Earnings in this way, and also uses Core Earnings to compute the incentive fee due under our management agreement. The Company believes that its investors also use Core Earnings or a comparable supplemental performance measure to evaluate and compare the performance of the Company and its peers, and as such, the Company believes that the disclosure of Core Earnings is useful to (and expected by) its investors.
However, the Company cautions that Core Earnings does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP), or an indication of our cash flows from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP), a measure of our liquidity, or an indication of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions. In addition, our methodology for calculating Core Earnings may differ from the methodologies employed by other REITs to calculate the same or similar supplemental performance measures, and accordingly, our reported Core Earnings may not be comparable to the Core Earnings reported by other REITs.
In assessing the appropriate weighted average diluted share count to apply to Core Earnings for purposes of determining Core Earnings per share (“EPS”), management considered the following attributes of our current GAAP diluted share methodology: (i) our unvested stock awards representing participating securities were determined to be anti-dilutive and were thus excluded from the denominator of the EPS calculation; and (ii) the portion of the convertible senior notes that are “in-the-money” (referred to as the “conversion spread value”), representing the value that would be delivered to investors in shares upon an assumed conversion, is included in the denominator. Because compensation expense related to unvested stock awards is added back for Core Earnings purposes pursuant to the definition above, there is no dilution to Core Earnings resulting from the associated expense recognition. As a result, for purposes of determining Core EPS, our GAAP EPS methodology was adjusted to include (instead of exclude) such unvested awards. Further, conversion of the convertible senior notes is an event that is contingent upon numerous factors, none of which are in our control, and is an event that may or may not occur. Consistent with the treatment of other unrealized adjustments to Core Earnings, our GAAP EPS methodology was adjusted to exclude (instead of include) the conversion spread value in determining Core EPS until a conversion actually occurs. The following table presents our diluted
weighted average shares used in our GAAP EPS calculation reconciled to our diluted weighted average shares used in our Core EPS calculation (amounts in thousands):
Diluted weighted average shares - GAAP
Add: Unvested stock awards
1,940
1,722
1,447
1,778
Less: Conversion spread value
(3,142)
(441)
(3,128)
(456)
Diluted weighted average shares - Core
261,649
238,878
260,883
238,689
The definition of Core Earnings allows management to make adjustments, subject to the approval of a majority of our independent directors, in situations where such adjustments are considered appropriate in order for Core Earnings to be calculated in a manner consistent with its definition and objective. No adjustments to the definition of Core Earnings occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2017.
The following table summarizes our quarterly Core Earnings per weighted average diluted share for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:
Core Earnings For the Three-Month Periods Ended
March 31
June 30
0.51
0.52
0.50
The following table presents our summarized results of operations and reconciliation to Core Earnings for the three months ended June 30, 2017, by business segment (amounts in thousands, except per share data):
Costs and expenses
(28,021)
(37,861)
(47,035)
Other income (loss)
Income attributable to non-controlling interests
Add / (Deduct):
Non-cash equity compensation expense
821
847
3,209
4,905
Management incentive fee
4,335
(49)
4,367
17,509
21,892
Interest income adjustment for securities
(224)
2,296
Deferred income tax provision for discrete transactions
9,911
Other non-cash items
(589)
Reversal of unrealized (gains) / losses on:
152
(15,558)
(15,406)
(12,256)
(11,998)
Derivatives
14,482
1,612
20,229
36,323
Foreign currency
(12,882)
(11)
(17)
(12,910)
(1,230)
(35,892)
(2,488)
(39,610)
Purchases and sales of properties
Recognition of realized gains / (losses) on:
18,736
(3,069)
(36)
(246)
(3,417)
377
(68)
325
2,387
1,791
5,408
2,449
(153)
Core Earnings (Loss)
99,473
70,942
17,807
(51,447)
136,775
Core Earnings (Loss) per Weighted Average Diluted Share
0.38
0.27
0.07
(0.20)
The following table presents our summarized results of operations and reconciliation to Core Earnings for the three months ended June 30, 2016, by business segment (amounts in thousands, except per share data):
(30,478)
(38,232)
(34,215)
2,868
226
136
362
2,921
15,369
18,290
(243)
5,857
5,614
(783)
(13,235)
(7,459)
(7,429)
(16,530)
3,635
(8,330)
(21,225)
17,840
(870)
16,988
(1,224)
(1,286)
(2,429)
(4,939)
13,679
(4,554)
25,321
(3,104)
22,217
(25,704)
839
(19)
(24,884)
630
2,333
4,187
102,359
49,905
12,745
(45,099)
119,910
0.43
0.21
0.05
(0.19)
The Lending Segment’s Core Earnings decreased by $2.9 million, from $102.4 million during the second quarter of 2016 to $99.5 million in the second quarter of 2017. After making adjustments for the calculation of Core Earnings, revenues were $128.9 million, costs and expenses were $29.9 million and other income was $0.9 million.
Core revenues, consisting principally of interest income on loans, decreased by $1.5 million in the second quarter of 2017 primarily due to (i) a $2.3 million decrease in interest income from loans principally due to lower levels of prepayment related income during the second quarter of 2017 which exceeded the benefits of increases in LIBOR, partially offset by (ii) a $0.6 million increase in interest income principally from CMBS investments.
Core costs and expenses increased by $2.2 million in the second quarter of 2017 primarily due to an increase in interest expense associated with the various secured financing facilities used to fund a portion of our investment portfolio.
73
Core other income increased by $0.8 million, principally due to a favorable change in foreign currency gain (loss) partially offset by an unfavorable change in gain (loss) on foreign currency derivatives.
The Investing and Servicing Segment’s Core Earnings increased by $21.0 million, from $49.9 million during the second quarter of 2016 to $70.9 million in the second quarter of 2017. After making adjustments for the calculation of Core Earnings, revenues were $91.1 million, costs and expenses were $32.7 million, other income was $11.9 million and income tax benefit was $0.6 million.
Core revenues increased by $3.0 million in the second quarter of 2017, primarily due to increases of $4.5 million in rental income on our expanded REO Portfolio and $2.2 million in interest income from our CMBS portfolio, partially offset by a $3.6 million decrease in servicing fees reflecting the divestiture of our European servicing and advisory business in October 2016.
Core costs and expenses decreased by $1.0 million in the second quarter of 2017, primarily due to a $3.4 million decrease in general and administrative expenses reflecting the divestiture of our European servicing and advisory business, partially offset by increases of $1.6 million in costs of rental operations and $1.5 million in interest expense on secured financings for CMBS and the REO Portfolio.
Core other income increased by $15.7 million principally due to increases in realized gains on sales of CMBS investments, conduit loans and commercial real estate.
Income taxes, which principally relate to the operating results of our servicing and conduit businesses which are held in TRSs, decreased $1.3 million to a benefit due to a decrease in the taxable income of our TRSs.
The Property Segment’s Core Earnings increased by $5.1 million, from $12.7 million during the second quarter of 2016 to $17.8 million in the second quarter of 2017. After making adjustments for the calculation of Core Earnings, revenues were $46.1 million, costs and expenses were $29.8 million and other income was $1.5 million.
Core revenues increased by $17.2 million in the second quarter of 2017, primarily due to the inclusion of rental income for the Medical Office Portfolio acquired in December 2016.
Core costs and expenses increased by $11.1 million in the second quarter of 2017, primarily due to increases in rental related costs of $5.4 million and interest expense of $5.3 million primarily on the secured financing for the Medical Office Portfolio.
Core other income decreased by $1.0 million in the second quarter of 2017, primarily due to a decrease in equity in earnings recognized from our investment in the Retail Fund.
Core corporate costs and expenses increased by $6.3 million, from $45.1 million in the second quarter of 2016 to $51.4 million in the second quarter of 2017, primarily due to increases in interest expense of $5.5 million and base management fees of $1.8 million.
The following table presents our summarized results of operations and reconciliation to Core Earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2017, by business segment (amounts in thousands, except per share data):
(52,870)
(76,100)
(91,343)
(336,697)
(Income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests
1,570
1,476
4,961
8,056
9,805
8,841
34,880
43,754
(472)
4,365
3,893
818
(1,169)
5,565
(26,151)
86
(31,301)
(31,215)
18,503
501
(17,745)
(17,774)
(1,700)
(36,909)
(4,949)
(43,558)
29,468
10,989
14,857
(751)
122
13,982
(13,204)
(898)
(14,086)
1,680
2,853
3,563
8,096
197,544
136,227
36,678
(101,864)
268,585
0.76
0.14
(0.39)
1.03
75
The following table presents our summarized results of operations and reconciliation to Core Earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2016, by business segment (amounts in thousands, except per share data):
(56,687)
(73,350)
(65,613)
(302,517)
2,487
10,907
14,742
7,467
815
694
1,509
31,089
36,216
6,746
6,242
(2,408)
244
44,069
44,313
(14,183)
14,398
2,117
19,662
(2,330)
17,366
(1,692)
(2,663)
(4,858)
(9,213)
18,471
(7,877)
25,875
(9,816)
(70)
15,989
(25,771)
2,193
(23,612)
1,755
6,384
200,878
102,274
22,595
(86,943)
238,804
0.09
(0.36)
1.00
The Lending Segment’s Core Earnings decreased by $3.4 million, from $200.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2016 to $197.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017. After making adjustments for the calculation of Core Earnings, revenues were $250.7 million, costs and expenses were $54.3 million and other income was $2.2 million.
Core revenues, consisting principally of interest income on loans, decreased by $3.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017 primarily due to (i) a $7.9 million decrease in interest income from loans principally due to lower levels of prepayment related income during the second quarter of 2017 which exceeded the benefits of increases in
76
LIBOR, partially offset by (ii) a $3.7 million increase in interest income principally from CMBS and RMBS investments.
Core costs and expenses increased slightly by $0.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017.
Core other income increased by $1.0 million, principally due to decreased foreign currency losses partially offset by increased gains on foreign currency derivatives.
The Investing and Servicing Segment’s Core Earnings increased by $33.9 million, from $102.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2016 to $136.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017. After making adjustments for the calculation of Core Earnings, revenues were $173.4 million, costs and expenses were $64.9 million, other income was $25.5 million and income tax benefit was $1.8 million.
Core revenues decreased by $10.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to decreases of $9.7 million in servicing fees reflecting the divestiture of our European servicing and advisory business and $9.4 million in interest income from our CMBS portfolio, partially offset by a $10.1 million increase in rental income on our expanded REO Portfolio.
Core costs and expenses decreased by $0.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to a decrease in general and administrative expenses reflecting the divestiture of our European servicing and advisory business, partially offset by increases in costs of rental operations and interest expense on secured financings for CMBS and the REO Portfolio.
Core other income increased by $41.2 million principally due to increases in realized gains on sales of CMBS investments, conduit loans and commercial real estate.
Income taxes, which principally relate to the operating results of our servicing and conduit businesses which are held in TRSs, decreased $2.5 million to a benefit due to a decrease in the taxable income of our TRSs.
The Property Segment’s Core Earnings increased by $14.1 million, from $22.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2016 to $36.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017. After making adjustments for the calculation of Core Earnings, revenues were $90.6 million, costs and expenses were $56.8 million and other income was $2.9 million.
Core revenues increased by $37.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to the inclusion of a full period of rental income for the Medical Office Portfolio and the Woodstar Portfolio.
Core costs and expenses increased by $23.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to increases in rental related costs of $11.3 million and interest expense of $10.5 million primarily on the secured financing for the Medical Office Portfolio.
Core other income was relatively unchanged during the six months ended June 30, 2017.
Core corporate costs and expenses increased by $15.0 million, from $86.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2016 to $101.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to increases in interest expense of $11.1 million and base management fees of $3.6 million.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is a measure of our ability to meet our cash requirements, including ongoing commitments to repay borrowings, fund and maintain our assets and operations, make new investments where appropriate, pay dividends to our stockholders, and other general business needs. We closely monitor our liquidity position and believe that we have sufficient current liquidity and access to additional liquidity to meet our financial obligations for at least the next 12 months. Our strategy for managing liquidity and capital resources has not changed since December 31, 2016. Refer to our Form 10-K for a description of these strategies.
Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 (amounts in thousands)
Excluding Investing
GAAP
Adjustments
and Servicing VIEs
Net cash used in operating activities
(3,434)
(348,471)
Proceeds from principal collections and sale of loans
906,376
(61,725)
(69,158)
Proceeds from sales and collections of investment securities
97,393
50,693
148,086
(19,039)
Net cash flows from other investments and assets
(38,921)
(30,071)
(283,352)
Proceeds from common stock issuances, net of offering costs
(278)
79,099
(38,840)
Net cash provided by financing activities
30,071
281,811
Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
(350,012)
(1,148)
649,607
(4,582)
300,611
The discussion below is on a non-GAAP basis, after removing adjustments principally resulting from the consolidation of the Investing and Servicing Segment’s VIEs under ASC 810. These adjustments principally relate to (i) purchase of CMBS, loans and real estate from consolidated VIEs, which are reflected as repayments of VIE debt on a GAAP basis and (ii) principal collections of CMBS related to consolidated VIEs, which are reflected as VIE distributions on a GAAP basis. There is no significant net impact to cash flows from operations or to overall cash resulting from these consolidations. Refer to Note 2 of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
Cash and cash equivalents decreased by $350.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017, reflecting net cash used in operating activities of $348.5 million and net cash used in investing activities of $283.3 million, partially offset by net cash provided by financing activities of $281.8 million.
Net cash used in operating activities of $348.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 related primarily to $520.9 million of originations and purchases of loans held-for-sale, net of proceeds from principal collections and sales, cash interest expense of $113.6 million, general and administrative expenses of $48.2 million, management fees of $46.1 million and a net change in operating assets and liabilities of $15.0 million. Offsetting these cash outflows were cash interest income of $174.1 million from our loan origination and conduit programs, plus cash interest income on investment securities of $91.8 million. Net rental income provided cash of $70.4 million and servicing fees provided cash of $59.7 million.
Net cash used in investing activities of $283.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 related primarily to the origination and acquisition of new loans held-for-investment of $1.2 billion, the purchase of investment securities of $69.2 million and the purchase of commercial real estate of $19.0 million, partially offset by proceeds received from principal collections and sales of loans of $906.4 million and investment securities of $148.1 million
Net cash provided by financing activities of $281.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 related primarily to net borrowings after repayments of our secured and unsecured debt of $535.6 million, partially offset by dividend distributions of $249.9 million.
79
Our Investment Portfolio
The following table sets forth the amount of each category of investments we owned across various property types within our Lending Segment as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):
Unlevered
Asset Specific
Return on
Investment
Vintage
Asset
First mortgages (1)
5,322,750
2,988,103
1989-2017
Subordinated mortgages
1998-2015
Mezzanine loans (1)
2006-2017
Other loans
311,407
2013-2017
Loan loss allowance
67,821
188,576
2003-2007
HTM securities (2)
470,549
311,731
154,071
2013-2015
11,905
Investments in unconsolidated entities
7,427,370
4,591,858
4,861,214
2,935,474
1989-2016
6.4
4,021
274,011
11.5
2006-2016
10.7
38,832
215,083
10.3
515,027
305,531
204,449
6.0
11,275
6,830,932
6,669,499
4,376,037
CMBS held-to-maturity (“HTM”) and mandatorily redeemable preferred equity interests in commercial real estate entities.
80
As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, our Lending Segment’s investment portfolio, excluding loans held-for-sale, RMBS and other investments, had the following characteristics based on carrying values:
Collateral Property Type
Office
33.1
35.8
Hospitality
21.2
22.9
Mixed Use
23.1
15.1
Multi-family
10.5
15.3
Retail
6.8
7.0
Residential
3.4
Industrial
2.0
Geographic Location
North East
37.0
37.7
West
21.0
21.5
South East
12.8
11.6
South West
8.2
International
9.0
9.5
Mid Atlantic
3.5
Midwest
5.9
7.3
The following table sets forth the amount of each category of investments we owned within our Investing and Servicing Segment as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (amounts in thousands):
Specific
CMBS, fair value option
4,130,892
179,891
829,260
Intangible assets - servicing rights
66,016
Lease intangibles, net
25,924
294,732
175,665
115,817
195,148
90,042
4,429,632
1,770,982
1,220,278
4,459,655
206,651
783,919
89,320
29,676
33,131
30,148
186,901
90,711
4,543,162
1,527,275
1,100,592
Includes $995.3 million and $959.0 million of CMBS reflected in “VIE liabilities” in accordance with ASC 810 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
Includes $27.4 million and $34.2 million of servicing rights intangibles reflected in “VIE assets” in accordance with ASC 810 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
Our Investing and Servicing Segment’s REO Portfolio, as defined in Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, had the following characteristics based on carrying values of $289.9 million and $283.5 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively:
Property Type
43.6
45.8
29.2
23.9
15.4
18.1
7.2
7.5
Self-storage
4.6
4.7
53.1
51.0
16.7
17.3
9.4
7.8
8.0
The following table sets forth the amount of each category of investments, which are comprised of properties, intangible lease assets and liabilities and our equity investment in four regional shopping malls (the “Retail Fund”) held within our Property Segment as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (amounts in thousands):
115,749
122,124
1,914,209
The following table sets forth our net investment and other information regarding the Property Segment’s properties and intangible lease assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2017 (dollars in thousands):
Occupancy
Lease Term
Office—Medical Office Portfolio
767,959
487,466
280,493
94.5
6.2 years
Office—Ireland Portfolio
495,295
318,256
177,039
88.8
9.1 years
Multi-family residential—Ireland Portfolio
17,947
11,631
6,316
98.0
0.2 years
Multi-family residential—Woodstar Portfolio
611,533
410,049
201,484
98.4
0.5 years
Subtotal—undepreciated carrying value
1,892,734
665,332
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
(101,677)
Net carrying value
1,791,057
563,655
82
As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, our Property Segment’s investment portfolio had the following geographic characteristics based on carrying values:
Ireland
26.7
25.2
U.S. Regions:
39.1
39.7
12.7
13.0
8.5
8.7
New Credit Facilities and Amendments
Refer to Notes 9 and 10 of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a detailed discussion of new credit facilities and amendments to existing credit facilities executed since December 31, 2016.
Borrowings under Various Secured Financing Arrangements
The following table is a summary of our secured financing facilities as of June 30, 2017 (dollars in thousands):
Approved
Maximum
but
Unallocated
Current
Extended
Facility
Outstanding
Undrawn
Maturity (a)
Size
Balance
Capacity (b)
Amount (c)
1,196,618
803,382
163,496
225,858
188,702
580,558
289,746
3,200
42,876
40,930
(k)
69,351
123,649
19,643
(l)
34,202
4,788,996
421,549
83
Approved but undrawn capacity represents the total draw amount that has been approved by the lender related to those assets that have been pledged as collateral, less the drawn amount.
Unallocated financing amount represents the maximum facility size less the total draw capacity that has been approved by the lender.
Maturity date for borrowings collateralized by loans is September 2018 before extension options and September 2021 assuming the exercise of extension options. Borrowings collateralized by loans existing at maturity may remain outstanding until such loan collateral matures, subject to certain specified conditions and not to exceed September 2025.
The initial maximum facility size of $1.8 billion may be increased to $2.0 billion at our option, subject to certain conditions.
The initial maximum facility size of $450.0 million may be increased to $650.0 million at our option, subject to certain conditions.
Facility carries a rolling 11 month term which may reset monthly with the lender’s consent not to exceed December 2018. This facility carries no maximum facility size. Amount herein reflects the outstanding balance as of June 30, 2017.
Facility carries a rolling 12 month term which may reset monthly with the lender’s consent. Current maturity is June 2018. This facility carries no maximum facility size. Amount herein reflects the outstanding balance as of June 30, 2017.
As of June 30, 2017, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. is our largest creditor through two repurchase facilities (Lender 1 Repo 1 facility and mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) Repo 4 facility).
Refer to Note 9 of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further disclosure regarding the terms of our secured financing arrangements.
Variance between Average and Quarter-End Credit Facility Borrowings Outstanding
The following table compares the average amount outstanding under our secured financing agreements during each quarter and the amount outstanding as of the end of each quarter, together with an explanation of significant variances (amounts in thousands):
Weighted-Average
Explanations
Quarter-End
Balance During
for Significant
Quarter Ended
Quarter
Variance
Variances
4,197,218
4,073,485
123,733
March 31, 2017
4,456,347
4,154,497
301,850
4,591,428
197,568
Variance primarily due to the following: (i) $491.2 million drawn on Medical Office Portfolio Mortgages in December 2016; (ii) $300.0 million drawn on the Term Loan A facility in December 2016; and (iii) $283.6 million drawn on the Lender 9 Repo 1 facility in December 2016; partially offset by (iv) $653.2 million pay down of the former Term Loan B facility in December 2016.
Variance primarily due to the following: (i) $336.8 million drawn on the Lender 1 Repo 1 facility in March 2017.
Variance primarily due to the following: (i) $136.8 million drawn on the Lender 10 Repo 1 facility in May 2017; and (ii) $60.0 million drawn on the Lender 4 Repo 2 facility throughout the quarter.
Borrowings under Unsecured Senior Notes
During the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the weighted average effective borrowing rate on our unsecured senior notes was 5.5% and 5.7%, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the weighted average effective borrowing rate on our unsecured senior notes was 5.6% and 5.7%, respectively. The effective borrowing rate includes the effects of underwriter purchase discount and the adjustment for the conversion option on the convertible notes, the initial value of which reduced the balance of the notes.
84
Refer to Note 10 of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further disclosure regarding the terms of our unsecured senior notes.
Scheduled Principal Repayments on Investments and Overhang on Financing Facilities
The following scheduled and/or projected principal repayments on our investments were based upon the amounts outstanding and contractual terms of the financing facilities in effect as of June 30, 2017 (amounts in thousands):
Scheduled Principal
Scheduled/Projected
Projected/Required
Repayments on Loans
Principal Repayments
Repayments of
Inflows Net of
and HTM Securities
on RMBS and CMBS
Financing Outflows
Third Quarter 2017
697,079
92,905
(393,674)
396,310
Fourth Quarter 2017
900,762
30,810
(928,779)
2,793
First Quarter 2018
508,606
31,350
(486,762)
53,194
Second Quarter 2018
472,754
36,847
(336,832)
172,769
2,579,201
191,912
(2,146,047)
625,066
Issuances of Equity Securities
We may raise funds through capital market transactions by issuing capital stock. There can be no assurance, however, that we will be able to access the capital markets at any particular time or on any particular terms. We have authorized 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock and 500,000,000 shares of common stock. At June 30, 2017, we had 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock available for issuance and 239,445,716 shares of common stock available for issuance.
Other Potential Sources of Financing
In the future, we may also use other sources of financing to fund the acquisition of our target assets, including other secured as well as unsecured forms of borrowing and sale of certain investment securities which no longer meet our return requirements.
Repurchases of Equity Securities and Convertible Senior Notes
In September 2014, our board of directors authorized and announced the repurchase of up to $250.0 million of our outstanding common stock over a period of one year. Subsequent amendments to the repurchase program approved by our board of directors in December 2014, June 2015, January 2016 and February 2017 resulted in the program being (i) amended to increase maximum repurchases to $500.0 million, (ii) expanded to allow for the repurchase of our outstanding convertible senior notes under the program and (iii) extended through January 2019. Purchases made pursuant to the program are made in either the open market or in privately negotiated transactions from time to time as permitted by federal securities laws and other legal requirements. The timing, manner, price and amount of any repurchases are discretionary and will be subject to economic and market conditions, stock price, applicable legal requirements and other factors. The program may be suspended or discontinued at any time. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we repurchased $230.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 2018 Notes for $250.7 million, however, this repurchase was not considered part of the repurchase program and therefore does not reduce our available capacity for future repurchases under the repurchase program. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we did not repurchase any common stock under the repurchase program. As of June 30, 2017, we have $262.2 million of remaining capacity to repurchase common stock and/or convertible senior notes under the repurchase program.
85
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have relationships with unconsolidated entities and financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as VIEs. Our maximum risk of loss associated with our involvement in VIEs is limited to the carrying value of our investment in the entity and any unfunded capital commitments. Refer to Note 14 of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
Dividends
We intend to continue to make regular quarterly distributions to holders of our common stock. U.S. federal income tax law generally requires that a REIT distribute annually at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains, and that it pay tax at regular corporate rates to the extent that it annually distributes less than 100% of its net taxable income. We intend to continue to pay regular quarterly dividends to our stockholders in an amount approximating our net taxable income, if and to the extent authorized by our board of directors. Before we pay any dividend, whether for U.S. federal income tax purposes or otherwise, we must first meet both our operating and debt service requirements. If our cash available for distribution is less than our net taxable income, we could be required to sell assets or borrow funds to make cash distributions or we may make a portion of the required distribution in the form of a taxable stock distribution or distribution of debt securities. Refer to our Form 10-K for a detailed dividend history.
The Company’s board of directors declared the following dividends during the six months ended June 30, 2017:
Declare Date
Leverage Policies
Our strategies with regards to use of leverage have not changed significantly since December 31, 2016. Refer to our Form 10-K for a description of our strategies regarding use of leverage.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
Contractual obligations as of June 30, 2017 are as follows (amounts in thousands):
Less than
More than
1 year
1 to 3 years
3 to 5 years
5 years
Secured financings (a)
636,012
1,044,051
781,866
Loan funding commitments (b)
1,392,052
752,088
600,751
39,213
Future lease commitments
30,483
6,433
11,950
5,558
6,542
8,284,760
1,300,593
Includes available extension options.
Excludes $187.4 million of loan funding commitments in which management projects the Company will not be obligated to fund in the future due to repayments made by the borrower either earlier than, or in excess of, expectations.
The table above does not include interest payable, amounts due under our management agreement or amounts due under our derivative agreements as those contracts do not have fixed and determinable payments.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Refer to the section of our Form 10-K entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Estimates” for a full discussion of our critical accounting estimates. Our critical accounting estimates have not materially changed since December 31, 2016.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We seek to manage our risks related to the credit quality of our assets, interest rates, liquidity, prepayment speeds and market value while, at the same time, seeking to provide an opportunity to stockholders to realize attractive risk-adjusted returns through ownership of our capital stock. While we do not seek to avoid risk completely, we believe the risk can be quantified from historical experience and seek to actively manage that risk, to earn sufficient compensation to justify taking those risks and to maintain capital levels consistent with the risks we undertake. Our strategies for managing risk and our exposure to such risks have not changed materially since December 31, 2016. Refer to our Form 10-K, Item 7A for further discussion.
Credit Risk
Our loans and investments are subject to credit risk. The performance and value of our loans and investments depend upon the owners’ ability to operate the properties that serve as our collateral so that they produce cash flows adequate to pay interest and principal due to us. To monitor this risk, our Manager’s asset management team reviews our investment portfolios and is in regular contact with our borrowers, monitoring performance of the collateral and enforcing our rights as necessary.
We seek to further manage credit risk associated with our Investing and Servicing Segment loans held-for-sale through the purchase of credit index instruments. The following table presents our credit index instruments as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):
Face Value of
Aggregate Notional Value of
Number of
Loans Held-for-Sale
Credit Index Instruments
14,000
Refer to Note 5 of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of weighted average ratings of our investment securities.
Capital Market Risk
We are exposed to risks related to the equity capital markets, and our related ability to raise capital through the issuance of our common stock or other equity instruments. We are also exposed to risks related to the debt capital markets, and our related ability to finance our business through borrowings under repurchase obligations or other debt instruments. As a REIT, we are required to distribute a significant portion of our taxable income annually, which constrains our ability to accumulate operating cash flow and therefore requires us to utilize debt or equity capital to finance our business. We seek to mitigate these risks by monitoring the debt and equity capital markets to inform our decisions on the amount, timing, and terms of capital we raise.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including fiscal and monetary policies and domestic and international economic and political considerations, as well as other factors beyond our control. We are subject to interest rate risk in connection with our investments and the related financing obligations. In general, we seek to match
87
the interest rate characteristics of our investments with the interest rate characteristics of any related financing obligations such as repurchase agreements, bank credit facilities, term loans, revolving facilities and securitizations. In instances where the interest rate characteristics of an investment and the related financing obligation are not matched, we mitigate such interest rate risk through the utilization of interest rate derivatives of the same duration. The following table presents financial instruments where we have utilized interest rate derivatives to hedge interest rate risk and the related interest rate derivatives as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):
Aggregate Notional
Value of Interest
Number of Interest
Hedged Instruments
Rate Derivatives
Instrument hedged as of June 30, 2017
8,000
289,832
247,600
69,000
Secured financing agreements
1,044,273
1,030,226
1,733,305
1,354,826
Instrument hedged as of December 31, 2016
50,900
1,011,067
1,003,064
1,482,015
1,130,964
The following table summarizes the estimated annual change in net investment income for our LIBOR-based investments and our LIBOR-based debt assuming increases or decreases in LIBOR and adjusted for the effects of our interest rate hedging activities (amounts in thousands, except per share data):
Variable-rate
investments and
3.0%
2.0%
1.0%
Income (Expense) Subject to Interest Rate Sensitivity
indebtedness (1)
Increase
Decrease (2)
Investment income from variable-rate investments
6,216,707
180,485
119,529
58,728
(45,344)
Interest expense from variable-rate debt, net of interest rate derivatives
(2,938,818)
(94,733)
(64,943)
(33,673)
33,601
Net investment income from variable rate instruments
3,277,889
85,752
54,586
25,055
(11,743)
Impact per diluted shares outstanding
0.32
(0.04)
Includes the notional value of interest rate derivatives.
Assumes LIBOR does not go below 0%.
Foreign Currency Risk
We intend to hedge our currency exposures in a prudent manner. However, our currency hedging strategies may not eliminate all of our currency risk due to, among other things, uncertainties in the timing and/or amount of payments received on the related investments, and/or unequal, inaccurate, or unavailable hedges to perfectly offset changes in future exchange rates. Additionally, we may be required under certain circumstances to collateralize our currency hedges for the benefit of the hedge counterparty, which could adversely affect our liquidity.
Consistent with our strategy of hedging foreign currency exposure on certain investments, we typically enter into a series of forwards to fix the U.S. dollar amount of foreign currency denominated cash flows (interest income, rental income and principal payments) we expect to receive from our foreign currency denominated investments. Accordingly, the notional values and expiration dates of our foreign currency hedges approximate the amounts and timing of future payments we expect to receive on the related investments.
The following table represents our current currency hedge exposure as it relates to our investments denominated in foreign currencies, along with the aggregate notional amount of the hedges in place (amounts in thousands except for number of contracts, using the June 30, 2017 GBP closing rate of 1.3025, Euro (“EUR”) closing rate of 1.1429, Swedish Krona (“SEK”) closing rate of 0.1187, Norwegian Krone (“NOK”) closing rate of 0.1198 and Danish Krone (“DKK”) closing rate of 0.1537):
Carrying Value of Net Investment
Local Currency
Number of Foreign Exchange Contracts
Aggregate Notional Value of Hedges Applied
Expiration Range of Contracts
184,844
195,141
January 2018
19,429
22,454
July 2017 – June 2019
28,969
35,428
September 2017 – December 2018
2,002
EUR, DKK, NOK, SEK
9,045
19,391
23,618
August 2017 – November 2018
54,544
74,765
August 2017 – July 2020
1,867
March 2018
144,162
267,009
September 2017 – June 2020
13,497
July 2017 – April 2019
467,545
190
642,824
These foreign exchange contracts hedge our Euro currency exposure created by our acquisition of the Ireland Portfolio.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. No change in internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
89
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
Currently, no material legal proceedings are pending or, to our knowledge, threatened or contemplated against us, that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in the Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
There were no unregistered sales of securities during the three months ended June 30, 2017.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
There were no purchases of common stock during the three months ended June 30, 2017.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
STARWOOD PROPERTY TRUST, INC.
Date: August 9, 2017
By:
/s/ BARRY S. STERNLICHT
Barry S. Sternlicht Chief Executive Officer Principal Executive Officer
/s/ RINA PANIRY
Rina Paniry Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Chief Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Item 6. Exhibits.
(a)Index to Exhibits
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit No.
Description
31.1
Certification pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2
32.1
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
92