UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____________________ to _____________________
Commission File Number 0-23702
STEVEN MADDEN, LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
13-3588231
(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
52-16 Barnett Avenue, Long Island City, New York
11104
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code
(718) 446-1800
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer o (do not check if smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Yes o No x
As of August 5, 2009, the latest practicable date, there were 18,083,807 shares of common stock, $.0001 par value, outstanding.
STEVEN MADDEN, LTD.FORM 10-QQUARTERLY REPORTJune 30, 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited):
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
1
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
2
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
3
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4
ITEM 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
17
ITEM 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
26
ITEM 4.
Controls and Procedures
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Legal Proceedings
27
ITEM 1A.
Risk Factors
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
ITEM 5.
Other Information
28
ITEM 6.
Exhibits
Signatures
30
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATIONItem 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial StatementsSTEVEN MADDEN, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets(in thousands)
June 30, 2009
December 31, 2008
June 30, 2008
(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
53,276
89,588
18,849
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $1,127, $1,530 and $1,141
9,320
5,567
6,391
Due from factor, net of allowances of $10,357, $9,771 and $9,640
48,536
34,311
49,636
Note receivable – related party
—
3,370
3,247
Inventories
29,025
31,597
35,327
Marketable securities – available for sale
10,520
14,609
21,688
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
7,743
5,645
6,463
Prepaid taxes
2,069
7,104
Deferred taxes
8,006
7,980
9,493
Total current assets
166,426
194,736
158,198
3,491
Property and equipment, net
25,562
28,209
27,849
6,895
7,112
7,242
Deposits and other
1,942
2,260
2,326
47,839
20,615
5,774
Goodwill – net
23,472
23,574
16,942
Intangibles – net
7,257
8,187
9,167
Total Assets
282,884
284,693
227,498
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities:
Advances payable – factor
30,168
Accounts payable
22,880
18,018
20,838
Accrued expenses
19,679
16,435
11,197
Accrued incentive compensation
5,836
7,869
6,933
Total current liabilities
48,395
72,490
38,968
Deferred rent
4,925
4,773
4,498
Other liabilities
311
1,188
Total liabilities
53,631
78,451
43,466
Commitments, contingencies and other
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock – $.0001 par value, 5,000 shares authorized; none issued; Series A Junior Participating preferred stock – $.0001 par value, 60 shares authorized; none issued
Common stock – $.0001 par value, 90,000 shares authorized; 26,345, 26,135 and 25,956 shares issued, 18,083, 17,873 and 17,694 outstanding
Additional paid-in capital
141,353
137,362
133,297
Retained earnings
215,978
197,257
178,949
Other comprehensive (loss):
Unrealized (loss) on marketable securities
(97
)
(396
(233
Treasury stock – 8,262, 8,262 and 8,262 shares at cost
(127,984
Total stockholders’ equity
229,253
206,242
184,032
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements - unaudited
STEVEN MADDEN, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income(unaudited)(in thousands, except per share data)
Three Months EndedJune 30,
Six Months EndedJune 30,
2009
2008
Net sales
116,472
109,317
223,901
209,856
Cost of sales
66,909
63,780
130,851
124,104
Gross profit
49,563
45,537
93,050
85,752
Commission and licensing fee income – net
7,362
3,203
10,267
6,559
Operating expenses
(37,553
(36,593
(73,641
(77,327
Income from operations
19,372
12,147
29,676
14,984
Interest and other income, net
368
764
894
Income before provision for income taxes
19,740
12,515
30,440
15,878
Provision for income taxes
7,596
4,881
11,719
6,192
Net income
12,144
7,634
18,721
9,686
Basic income per share
0.67
0.43
1.04
0.51
Diluted income per share
0.66
1.03
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
18,014
17,662
17,952
18,839
Effect of dilutive securities – options/restricted stock
280
148
181
184
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
18,294
17,810
18,133
19,023
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows(unaudited)(in thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
Excess tax benefit from the exercise of options
(7
(69
Depreciation and amortization
4,828
4,662
Loss on disposal of fixed assets
560
826
191
(148
Non-cash compensation
2,774
3,237
Provision for bad debts
183
(4,665
Deferred rent expense
(862
1,028
Realized loss on marketable securities
55
655
Changes in:
Accounts receivable
(3,350
2,786
Due from factor
(14,811
(12,978
(121
2,572
(8,130
Prepaid expenses, prepaid taxes, deposits and other assets
289
(2,001
Accounts payable and other accrued expenses
10,845
(4,846
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
21,867
(10,078
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment
(1,644
(3,666
Purchase of marketable securities
(33,736
(5,293
Sale/redemption of marketable securities
10,678
57,415
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired *
(4,526
(4,923
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
(29,228
43,533
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayment of advances from factor
(30,168
Proceeds from options exercised
1,210
79
Tax benefit from exercise of options
7
69
Common stock purchased for treasury
(44,200
Net cash used in financing activities
(28,951
(44,052
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(36,312
(10,597
Cash and cash equivalents – beginning of period
29,446
Cash and cash equivalents – end of period
* The amount for 2009 was accrued at December 31, 2008. The amount for 2008 includes $3,903 which was accrued at December 31, 2007.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements – UnauditedJune 30, 2009($ in thousands except share and per share data)
Note A – Basis of Reporting
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Steven Madden, Ltd. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with the generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, such statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring items) which are considered necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position of the Company and the results of its operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The results of its operations for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year. It is suggested that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related disclosures for the year ended December 31, 2008 included in the Annual Report of Steven Madden, Ltd. on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 12, 2009.
Note B – Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Significant areas involving management estimates include allowances for bad debts, returns and customer chargebacks, and deferred tax asset valuation allowance. The Company provides reserves on trade accounts receivables and due from factors for future customer chargebacks and markdown allowances, discounts, returns and other miscellaneous compliance related deductions that relate to the current period sales. The Company evaluates anticipated chargebacks by reviewing several performance indicators of its major customers. These performance indicators, which include retailers’ inventory levels, sell-through rates and gross margin levels, are analyzed by key account executives and the Vice President of Wholesale Sales to estimate the amount of the anticipated customer allowance.
Note C – Due To and From Factor
Under the terms of its factoring agreement with GMAC Commercial Finance LLC (“GMAC”), as amended, the Company may request advances from the factor of up to 85% of aggregate receivables factored by GMAC. In November of 2008, the Company borrowed the maximum amount allowed by the terms of the agreement. As of December 31, 2008, the Company had advances payable due to GMAC of $30,168 against gross factored receivables of $44,082. Subsequent to the year end, the Company began reducing the loan balance with the proceeds from the collections of factored accounts receivable, and as of February 17, 2009, the loan was completely paid off. The interest rate on the advances, which has changed from time to time by amendments to the agreement and which is currently a variable rate based on the 30-day London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), averaged 3.9% through the date of repayment. Effective January 1, 2009, the factoring agreement was amended so that the Company retained title to its factored accounts receivable, which would keep its outstanding receivables from being the property of GMAC. On July 13, 2009, the Company terminated the GMAC Agreement, effective on September 14, 2009.
On July 10, 2009, the Company entered into a collection agency agreement with Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc., effective upon the termination of the existing factoring agreement with GMAC. The agreement provides the Company with a credit facility in the amount of $30,000, having a sub-limit of $15,000 on the aggregate face amount of letters of credit, at an interest rate based, at the Company’s election, upon either the prime rate or LIBOR.
Note D – Note Receivable – Related Party
On June 25, 2007, the Company made a loan to Steve Madden, its Creative and Design Chief and a principal stockholder of the Company, in the amount of $3,000, in order for Mr. Madden to satisfy a personal tax obligation resulting from the exercise of options that were due to expire and retain the underlying Company stock, which he pledged to the Company as collateral in connection with the loan. Mr. Madden executed a secured promissory note in favor of the Company that bears interest at an annual rate of 8% and was due on the earlier of the date Mr. Madden ceases to be employed by the Company or December 31, 2007. An amendment to the note dated December 19, 2007 extended the due date to March 31, 2009. A second amendment dated April 1, 2009 changed the interest rate to 6% and extended the due date of both principal and interest to June 30, 2015. As of June 30, 2009, $491 of interest has accrued on the note and has been reflected on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Pursuant to a pledge agreement between the Company and Mr. Madden, the note is secured by 510,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.
Note E – Marketable Securities
Marketable securities consist primarily of corporate and municipal bonds and U.S. treasury notes with maturities greater than three months and up to five years at the time of purchase as well as marketable equity securities. These securities, which are classified as available-for-sale, are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of any tax effect, reported in shareholders’ equity as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Amortization of premiums and discounts is included in interest income and is not material. The values of these securities may fluctuate as a result of changes in market interest rates and credit risk.
As of March 31, 2008, the Company held $16,070 in auction rate securities (“ARS”). In the first quarter of 2008, the liquidity in the ARS market evaporated causing the ARSs to fail at auction and accordingly, the auction rate securities were classified as long term as of March 31, 2008. As a result of the lack of liquidity in the ARS market, the Company recorded an unrealized loss on its ARSs of $230 for the three months ended March 31, 2008. During the months of June through December of 2008, the Company was able to liquidate its entire portfolio of ARSs at full face value, and as a result, the Company did not hold any ARSs as of December 31, 2008. The Company did not incur any losses with respect to its investments in ARSs and hence, the unrealized loss of $230 was reversed in the second quarter of 2008.
Note F – Fair Value Measurement
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. On February 12, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157”. The FSP amended FASB Statement No. 157 to delay the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (that is, at least annually), to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company adopted SFAS No. 157 for financial assets and liabilities in the first quarter of 2008 and adopted it for all other assets and liabilities in the first quarter of 2009. The Statement utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. A brief description of those three levels is as follows:
·
Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets of liabilities.
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs.
5
Note F – Fair Value Measurement (continued)
The Company’s financial assets subject to fair value measurements as of June 30, 2009 are as follows:
Fair Value MeasurementsUsing Fair Value Hierarchy
Fair value
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Current marketable securities – available for sale
Long-term marketable securities – available for sale
Total
111,635
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company had no assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). As of June 30, 2009, the Company does not have any financial liabilities. No gains or losses resulting from the fair value measurement of financial assets were included in the Company’s earnings.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that chose different measurement attributes for similar assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company has elected not to measure any eligible items at fair value.
Note G – Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying value of certain financial instruments such as accounts receivable, due from factors, accounts payable and advances payable to factor approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature of their underlying terms. The fair values of the financial instruments and investments are determined by reference to market data and other valuation techniques, as appropriate. Fair value of the note receivable approximates its carrying value based upon its interest rate, which approximates current market interest rates.
Note H – Inventories
Inventories, which consist of finished goods on hand and in transit, are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market.
Note I – Tender Offer
On March 25, 2008, the Company completed a tender offer to purchase 2,600,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for treasury at a total cost of $44,200 or $17.00 per share. The 2,600,000 shares that were purchased represented approximately 13% of the total number of shares outstanding prior to the completion of the tender offer.
6
Note J – Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue on wholesale sales when products are shipped pursuant to its standard terms which are freight on board (“FOB”) warehouse or when products are delivered to the consolidators as per the terms of the customers’ purchase order. Sales reductions for anticipated discounts, allowances and other deductions are recognized during the period when sales are recorded. Customers retain the right to replacement of the product for poor quality or improper or short shipments, which have historically been immaterial. Retail sales are recognized when the payment is received from customers and are recorded net of returns. The Company also generates commission income acting as a buying agent by arranging to manufacture private label shoes to the specifications of its clients. The Company’s commission revenue includes partial recovery of its design, product and development costs for the services provided to certain suppliers in connection with the Company’s private label business. Commission revenue and product and development cost recoveries are recognized as earned when title of the product transfers from the manufacturer to the customer and are reported on a net basis after deducting related operating expenses.
The Company licenses its trademarks for use in connection with the manufacturing, marketing and sale of cold weather accessories, sunglasses, eyewear, outerwear, bedding and hosiery. The license agreements require the licensee to pay the Company a royalty and, in substantially all of the agreements, an advertising fee based on the higher of a minimum or a net sales percentage as defined in the various agreements. In addition, under the terms of retail selling agreements, most of the Company’s international distributors are required to pay the Company a royalty based on a percentage of net sales, in addition to a commission on the purchases of the Company’s products. Licensing revenue is recognized on the basis of net sales reported by the licensees and international distributors, or the minimum guaranteed royalties, if higher. In substantially all of the Company’s license agreements, the minimum guaranteed royalty is earned and payable on a quarterly basis.
Note K – Taxes Collected From Customers
The Company accounts for certain taxes collected from its customers in accordance with the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force 06-03, “How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement” (“EITF 06-03”). EITF 06-03 allows companies to adopt a policy of presenting taxes in the income statement on either a gross basis (included in revenues and costs) or net basis (excluded from revenues). Taxes within the scope of EITF 06-03 would include taxes that are imposed on a revenue transaction between a seller and a customer, for example, sales taxes, use taxes, value-added taxes and some types of excise taxes. The Company has consistently recorded all taxes within the scope of EITF 06-03 on a net basis.
Note L – Sales Deductions
The Company supports retailers’ initiatives to maximize the sales of its products on the retail floor by subsidizing the co-op advertising programs of such retailers, providing them with inventory markdown allowances and participating in various other marketing initiatives of its major customers. Such expenses are reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income as deductions to sales. For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009, the total deduction to sales for these expenses was $8,438 and $13,592, respectively, as compared to $9,708 and $17,339 for the comparable periods in 2008.
Note M – Cost of Sales
All costs incurred to bring finished products to the Company’s distribution center and, in the Retail Division, the costs to bring products to the Company’s stores, are included in the cost of sales line on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income. These include the cost of finished products and related handling costs, purchase commissions, letter of credit fees, brokerage fees, sample expenses, customs duties, inbound freight, royalty payments on licensed products, labels and product packaging. All warehouse and distribution costs related to the Wholesale Division and freight to customers, if any, are included in the operating expenses line item of the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company’s gross margins may not be comparable to other companies in the industry because some companies may include warehouse and distribution costs as a component of cost of sales, while other companies report on the same basis as the Company and include them in operating expenses.
Note N – Net Income Per Share of Common Stock
Basic income per share is based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted income per share reflects the potential dilution assuming shares of common stock were issued upon the exercise of outstanding options and the proceeds thereof were used to purchase outstanding shares of common stock. Diluted income per share also reflects the unvested and unissued shares promised to employees that have a dilutive effect. In addition, diluted earnings per share include the amount of unrecognized share-based compensation costs attributed to future services and the amount of tax benefits, if any, that would be credited to Additional Paid-In Capital assuming the exercise of options. For both the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009, 103,000 stock options have been excluded from the calculation because inclusion of such shares would be anti-dilutive as compared with 160,000 stock options that have been excluded from the calculation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008.
Note O – Stock-Based Compensation
In March 2006, the Board of Directors approved the Steven Madden, Ltd. Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) under which nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, restricted stock, other stock-based awards and performance-based cash awards may be granted to employees, consultants and non-employee directors. The stockholders approved the Plan on May 26, 2006. The number of shares that may be issued or used under the Plan cannot exceed 1,200,000 shares. On May 25, 2007, the stockholders approved an amendment to the Plan to increase the maximum number of shares that may be issued under the Plan to 1,550,000. On May 22, 2009, the stockholders approved a second amendment to the Plan that increased the maximum number of shares that may be issued under the Plan to 4,064,000. The following table summarizes the number of shares of common stock shares authorized for use under the Plan, the amount of stock-based awards issued (net of expired or cancelled) and the amount of common stock available for the grant of stock-based awards under the Plan:
Common Stock authorized
4,064,000
Stock based awards, including restricted stock and stock options, granted net of expired or cancelled
1,573,000
Common Stock available for grant of stock based awards as of June 30, 2009
2,491,000
Total equity-based compensation for the three and six months ended June 30 is as follows:
Stock options
403
102
593
114
Restricted stock
1,127
1,040
2,181
3,123
1,530
1,142
8
Note O – Stock-Based Compensation (continued)
On March 24, 2008, the then Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company resigned from his positions. For the purposes of determining any payments to which such former executive was entitled following his resignation, it was mutually agreed to treat his resignation as a termination without cause, as defined in his employment agreement. Pursuant to an agreement with the Company, 42,500 shares of restricted stock that were due to vest in varying amounts over the next four years vested on the date of termination. Accordingly, the balance of unamortized stock-based compensation related to the former executive’s restricted stock of $921 was included as a one-time charge in operating expenses during the quarter ended March 31, 2008.
Equity-based compensation is included in operating expenses on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
Stock Options
Cash proceeds and intrinsic values related to total stock options exercised during both the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
Proceeds from stock options exercised
65
Intrinsic value of stock options exercised
1,161
99
137
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, 50,000 options with a fair value of $333 and 66,000 options with a fair value of $423 vested, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, 5,000 options vested with a fair value of $29. As of June 30, 2009, there were 801,000 unvested options with a total of $5,372 of unrecognized compensation cost and an average vesting period of 3.6 years. As of June 30, 2008, there were 260,000 unvested options with a total of $1,503 of unrecognized compensation cost and an average vesting period of 4.3 years. In April of 2008, 100,000 options were granted to Steven Madden, the Company’s Creative and Design Chief and a principal stockholder.
The Company estimates the fair value of options granted using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which requires several assumptions. The expected term of the options represents the estimated period of time until exercise and is based on the historical experience of similar awards. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The risk free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant. With the exception of a special dividend paid in November of 2005 and 2006, the Company historically has not paid dividends and thus the expected dividend rate is assumed to be zero. The following weighted average assumptions were used for stock options granted:
Six months ended June 30,
Expected volatility
49.9% to 52.1%
42.5% to 42.9%
Risk-free interest rate
1.39% to 1.71%
2.30% to 2.83%
Expected life (in years)
3.9
3.1 to 3.9
Expected dividend yield
None
Weighted average fair value
$8.40
$6.55
9
Activity relating to stock options granted under the Company’s plans and outside the plans during the six months ended June 30, 2009 is as follows:
Number ofShares
WeightedAverageExercisePrice
WeightedAverageRemainingContractualTerm
AggregateIntrinsicValue
Outstanding at January 1, 2009
772,000
16.18
Granted
482,000
21.02
Exercised
(91,000
13.30
Cancelled/Forfeited
(13,000
16.91
Outstanding at June 30, 2009
1,150,000
18.42
5.4
8,347
Exercisable at June 30, 2009
359,000
13.90
3.5
4,100
Restricted Stock
The following table summarizes restricted stock activity during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:
WeightedAverage FairValue atGrant Date
Non-vested at January 1
358,000
29.53
507,000
30.90
23,000
22.19
12,000
17.82
Vested
(119,000
29.83
(164,000
31.53
Forfeited
(1,000
34.05
(5,000
Non-vested at June 30
261,000
28.71
350,000
30.10
As of June 30, 2009, there was $6,030 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock awards granted under the Plan. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average of 1.8 years. The Company determines the fair value of its restricted stock awards based on the market price of its common stock on the date of grant.
Note P – Acquisition
Daniel M. Friedman
On February 7, 2006, the Company acquired all of the equity interest of privately held Daniel M. Friedman and Associates, Inc. and D.M.F. International (collectively, “Daniel M. Friedman”). Founded in 1995, Daniel M. Friedman designs, sources and markets name brand fashion handbags and accessories. The acquisition was completed for consideration of $18,710, including transaction costs. In addition, the purchase agreement includes certain earn-out provisions based on financial performance through 2010. On April 10, 2007, an amendment to the agreement shortened the earn-out period by one year through December 31, 2008 and advanced the earn-out payments from 2008 to 2007. On December 31, 2007, a preliminary earn-out provision for 2007 of $3,956 was charged to goodwill and on March 31, 2008, the 2007 earn-out provision was finalized at $4,923, which increased the total acquisition cost to $23,686. On December 31, 2008, a preliminary earn-out provision for 2008 of $6,632 was charged to goodwill which increased the total acquisition cost to $30,318. On March 31, 2009, the parties agreed to a tentative 2008 earn-out provision of $6,530, and accordingly, goodwill was reduced by $102 bringing the total acquisition cost to $30,216. Approximately 9% of the final payment was withheld as a reserve against contingencies.
10
Note P – Acquisition (continued)
The Daniel M. Friedman acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, “Business Combinations”. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of Daniel M. Friedman were adjusted to their fair values, and the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the assets acquired, including identified intangible assets, was recorded as goodwill. The fair values assigned to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on management’s estimates and assumptions. The total purchase price has been allocated as follows:
Current assets
9,772
Property, plant and equipment
Deposits
62
Intangible assets
8,400
Goodwill
16,424
Liabilities assumed
(4,731
Net assets acquired
30,216
Pursuant to the acquisition, the Company had a note receivable from the former owner and namesake of Daniel M. Friedman in the amount of $1,250. The note, which had an interest rate of 5%, was due and payable on the same day that the final earn-out payment was due. The note allowed the maker to offset the principal and interest due on the note against any earn-out monies that might be owed to him. On March 31, 2009, the note was offset against the final earn-out payment.
Note Q – Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The following is a summary of the carrying amount of goodwill by segment for the six months ended June 30, 2009:
----------Wholesale-----------
NetCarrying
Footwear
Accessories
Retail
Amount
Balance at January 1, 2009
1,547
16,526
5,501
Adjustment of purchase price – Daniel M. Friedman
0
(102
Balance at June 30, 2009
11
Note Q – Goodwill and Intangible Assets (continued)
The following table details identifiable intangible assets as of June 30, 2009:
Estimated lives
Cost basis
AccumulatedAmortization
Net carryingamount
Trade name
6 years
200
116
84
Customer relationships
10 years
6,400
1,703
4,697
License agreements
3-6 years
5,600
3,619
1,981
Non-compete agreement
5 years
930
439
491
Other
3 years
14
13,144
5,887
The estimated future amortization expense of purchased intangibles as of June 30, 2009 is as follows:
2009 (remaining six months)
929
2010
1,856
2011
1,381
2012
642
2013
Thereafter
1,807
Note R – Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009, after considering other comprehensive income including unrealized gain on marketable securities of $261 and $299, was $12,405 and $19,020, respectively. For the comparable periods ended June 30, 2008, after considering other comprehensive gain (loss) on marketable securities of $30 and ($172), comprehensive income was $7,664 and $9,514, respectively.
Note S – Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In December of 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141R, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141R”), which replaces FASB Statement No. 141. Under SFAS No. 141R, an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with limited exceptions. SFAS No. 141R establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. This statement also establishes disclosure requirements which will enable users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141R is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 141R did not have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as there were no business combinations.
12
Note S – Recently Issued Accounting Standards (continued)
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. 141R-1 “Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies” (“FSP 141R-1”). FSP 141R-1 amends the provisions in FASB Statement No. 141R for the initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosures for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations. FSP 141R-1 eliminates the distinction between contractual and non-contractual contingencies, including the initial recognition and measurement criteria in Statement 141R and instead carries forward most of the provision in SFAS 141 for acquired contingencies. FSP 141R-1 is effective for contingent assets and contingent liabilities acquired in business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of FSP No. 141R-1 did not have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – An Amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS No. 160”). SFAS No. 160 establishes new accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Specifically, this statement requires the recognition of a non-controlling interest (minority interest) as equity in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and separate from the parent’s equity. The amount of net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest will be included in consolidated net income on the face of the income statement. SFAS No. 160 clarifies that changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation are equity transactions if the parent retains its controlling financial interest. In addition, this statement requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. Such gain or loss will be measured using the fair value of the non-controlling equity investment on the deconsolidation date. SFAS No. 160 also includes expanded disclosure requirements regarding the interests of the parent and its non-controlling interest. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 160 did not have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (“FSP 142-3”). FSP 142-3 amends the factors to be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of intangible assets under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and other Intangible Assets”. Its intent is to improve the consistency between the useful life of an intangible asset and the period of expected cash flows used to measure its fair value. This FSP is effective prospectively for intangible assets acquired or renewed after January 1, 2009. The adoption of FSP 142-3 did not have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active” (“FSP 157-3”). FSP 157-3 clarifies the application of SFAS 157 in a market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not active. FSP 157-3 was effective upon issuance for all financial assets and liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The adoption of FSP 157-3 did not have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly” (“FSP No. 157-4”). FSP No. 157-4 provides additional guidance for estimating fair value under FASB No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements” when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. The adoption of FSP No. 157-4 in the second quarter of 2009 did not have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Additionally, the FASB issued FSP 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board Opinion APB 29-1, “Interim Disclosure about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“FSP No. 107-1/APB 28-1”). FSP No. 107-1/APB 28-1 requires fair value disclosures in interim financial statements for financial instruments that are not reflected in the balance sheet at fair value. The adoption of FSP No. 107-1/APB 28-1 in the second quarter of 2009 did not have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
13
In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 165, “Subsequent Events”, (“SFAS No. 165”). SFAS No. 165 establishes the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events of transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements, and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. We adopted this standard in the second quarter of 2009 and have evaluated any subsequent events through August 7, 2009. See Note U for additional disclosure regarding subsequent events.
In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162” (“SFAS No. 168”). SFAS No. 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by non-governmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP. The Codification did not change GAAP but reorganizes the literature. SFAS No. 168 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.
Note T – Commitments, Contingencies and Other
Legal proceedings:
(a)
On or about June 15, 2009, the Company was named as a defendant in a class action lawsuit filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, California. The Complaint, which seeks unspecified damages, alleges violations of California Labor Laws. Specifically, it alleges that the Company failed to provide mandated breaks to its employees and failed to provide overtime pay as required. Management believes that it is not currently possible to assess whether or not there will be any impact at all from this action, or if there is, what effect the ultimate resolution of the matter might have on the results of operation, financial position or cash flows.
(b)
On August 10, 2005, the U.S. Customs Department (“Customs”) issued a report that asserts that certain commissions that the Company treated as “buying agents’ commissions” (which are non-dutiable) should be treated as “selling agents’ commissions” and hence are dutiable. In September of 2007, Customs notified the Company that it had finalized its assessment of the underpaid duties to be $1,400. Pursuant to this assessment, the Company, with the advice of legal counsel, evaluated the liability in the case, including interest and penalties, and believes that it is not likely to exceed $2,700. Therefore, as of December 31, 2007, the Company had recorded a total reserve of $2,700 that was increased by $256 in the fourth quarter of 2008 to reflect anticipated additional interest costs, bringing the reserve to $2,956 as of December 31, 2008. Such reserve is subject to change to reflect the status of this matter.
(c)
The Company has been named as a defendant in certain other lawsuits in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, after consulting with legal counsel, the liabilities, if any, resulting from these matters should not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. It is the policy of management to disclose the amount or range of reasonably possible losses in excess of recorded amounts.
Note U – Subsequent Event
On July 8, 2009, the Company acquired certain of the assets constituting the Zone 88 and Shakedown Street lines of SML Brands, LLC, a subsidiary of Aimee Lynn, Inc. SML Brands designs and markets primarily private label accessories, principally handbags, for mass merchants and mid-tier retailers. The acquisition was completed for $1,259 in cash less the assumption of certain liabilities associated with the lines acquired.
Note V – Operating Segment Information
The Company operates the following business segments: Wholesale Footwear, Wholesale Accessories, Retail, First Cost and Licensing. The Wholesale Footwear segment, through sales to department and specialty stores worldwide, derives revenue from sales of branded women’s, men’s, girls’ and children’s footwear. The Wholesale Accessories segment, which includes branded and private label handbags, belts and small leather goods, derives revenues from sales to department and specialty stores worldwide. The Retail segment, through the operation of Company owned retail stores and the Company’s website, derives revenue from sales of branded women’s, men’s and children’s footwear and accessories. The First Cost segment represents activities of a subsidiary which earns commissions for serving as a buying agent of footwear products to mass-market merchandisers, shoe chains and other off-price retailers with respect to their purchase of footwear. In the License segment, the Company licenses its Steve Madden and Steven trademarks for use in connection with the manufacturing, marketing and sale of cold weather accessories, sunglasses, eyewear, outerwear, bedding and hosiery.
Candies has been transitioned from a “wholesale” model to a “first cost” model, and therefore revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2009 are included in the First Cost segment. As a result of this change, for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2009, net sales for the Wholesale Footwear segment does not reflect Candies revenue while net sales in the same periods of 2008 reflected revenue of $4,223 and $9,075, respectively, for the Candies business.
WholesaleFootwear
WholesaleAccessories
TotalWholesale
FirstCost
Licensing
Consolidated
Three months ended,June 30, 2009:
Net sales to external customers
74,204
13,993
88,197
28,275
28,345
4,134
32,479
17,084
Commissions and licensing fees - net
6,389
973
10,803
754
11,557
453
Segment assets
183,252
45,484
228,736
44,907
9,241
Capital expenditures
212
250
462
June 30, 2008:
64,835
14,591
79,426
29,891
22,752
4,770
27,522
18,015
2,500
703
Income (loss) from operations
7,631
1,349
8,980
(36
121,941
26,353
148,294
48,114
31,090
169
1,211
1,380
15
Note V – Operating Segment Information (continued)
Six months ended,June 30, 2009:
139,405
30,077
169,482
54,419
54,147
9,310
63,457
29,593
8,457
1,810
21,665
2,800
24,465
(5,056
1,241
1,644
125,863
29,123
154,986
54,870
45,718
10,090
55,808
29,944
4,840
1,719
11,754
2,990
14,744
(6,319
1,549
2,117
3,666
Prior to 2009, the Company’s international business operated under the “first cost” model and thus the revenues were included in Commissions and Licensing Fees on the Condensed Consolidate Statements of Income. In 2009, the Company’s international business began to operate under the “wholesale” model and thus, commencing with the first quarter of 2009, international revenues are included in the Net Sales line on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009, foreign net sales were $5,165 and $10,349, respectively.
16
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the unaudited Financial Statements and Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.
This Quarterly Report contains certain forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the federal securities laws. The events described in forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report may not occur. Generally forward-looking statements relate to business plans or strategies, projected or anticipated benefits or other consequences of our plans or strategies, projected or anticipated benefits from acquisitions to be made by us, or projections involving anticipated revenues, earnings or other aspects of our operating results. The words “may”, “will”, “expect”, “believe”, “anticipate”, “project”, “plan”, “intend”, “estimate”, and “continue”, and their opposites and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We caution you that these statements are not guarantees of future performance or events and are subject to a number of uncertainties, risks and other influences, many of which are beyond our control, that may influence the accuracy of the statements and the projections upon which the statements are based. Factors that may affect our results include, but are not limited to, the risks and uncertainties discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. Any one or more of these uncertainties, risks and other influences could materially affect our results of operations and whether forward-looking statements made by us ultimately prove to be accurate. Our actual results, performance and achievements could differ materially from those expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether from new information, future events or otherwise.
Overview:($ in thousands, except retail sales data per square foot and earnings per share)
Steven Madden, Ltd. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) designs, sources, markets and retails fashion-forward footwear for women, men and children. In addition, we design, source, market and retail name brand and private label fashion accessories, such as handbags and belts, through our Accessories Division. We distribute products through department and specialty stores, our retail stores, our e-commerce website throughout the United States and through special distribution arrangements in Canada, Europe, Central and South America, Australia and Asia. Our product line includes a broad range of updated styles which are designed to establish or capitalize on market trends, complemented by core products. We have established a reputation for our creative designs, popular styles and quality products, all delivered more efficiently and quickly than our competitors, and at accessible price points.
Prior to 2009, our international business operated under the “first cost” model and thus the revenues derived from our international business were included in Commissions and Licensing Fees on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. In order to improve operating efficiencies, and to give our international partners better visibility in the process, as of January of 2009, we have changed the operating model for our international business to the “wholesale” model. Under the “wholesale” model, we will be able to manage inventory levels, improve delivery times, and increase our ability to receive payments on a timely basis. As a result of this change, commencing with the first quarter of 2009, international revenues are now included in the Net Sales line on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. For the quarter ended June 30, 2009, our international business contributed net sales of $5,165, or 4.4% of our net sales.
Net sales for the second quarter of 2009 also reflect shifts related to our Candies businesses, which we distribute exclusively to Kohl’s. Pursuant to a mutual agreement with Kohl’s, Candies has been transitioned from a wholesale model to a “first cost” model, and therefore revenues for the second quarter of 2009 are included in Commissions and Licensing Fees on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. As a result of this change, net sales for the second quarter of 2009 does not reflect Candies revenue while net sales in the second quarter of 2008 reflected revenue of $4,223 for the Candies business.
Despite the ongoing global economic challenges, we continued our trend of positive sales and earnings growth during the second quarter of 2009. Our consolidated net sales increased 7% to $116,472 in the second quarter of 2009 when compared to consolidated net sales of $109,317 achieved in the same period of last year. Gross margin in the second quarter of 2009 improved to 43% from 42% in the second quarter of 2008. Net income increased 59% in the second quarter of this year to $12,144, compared with $7,634 in the same period last year. As a percentage of net sales, our net income improved to 10% in the second quarter of 2009 from 7% in the same period of last year. Diluted earnings per share for the second quarter of 2009 increased 53% to $0.66 per share on 18,294,000 diluted weighted average shares outstanding compared to $0.43 per share on 17,810,000 diluted weighted average shares outstanding in the second quarter of last year.
In our retail segment, same store sales (sales of those stores, including the e-commerce website, that were in operation throughout the second quarters of 2009 and 2008) decreased 5.4%. As of June 30, 2009, we had 92 stores in operation, compared to 98 stores as of June 30, 2008. During the twelve months ended June 30, 2009, sales per square foot was $627 compared to $635 achieved in the same period of 2008.
As of June 30, 2009, our total inventory decreased to $29,025 from $35,327 as of June 30, 2008, and our annualized inventory turnover improved to 8.6 times in the second quarter of 2009 from 8.1 times in the second quarter of 2008. Our accounts receivable average days outstanding improved to 52 days in the second quarter of 2009 compared to 57 days in the second quarter of the previous year. As of June 30, 2009, we had $111,635 in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, no short- or long-term debt, and total stockholders’ equity of $229,253. Working capital decreased to $118,031 as of June 30, 2009, compared to $119,230 on June 30, 2008.
On July 8, 2009, we acquired certain of the assets constituting the Zone 88 and Shakedown Street lines of SML Brands, LLC, a subsidiary of Aimee Lynn, Inc. SML Brands designs and markets primarily private label accessories, principally handbags, for mass merchants and mid-tier retailers. The acquisition was completed for $1,259 in cash less the assumption of certain liabilities associated with the lines acquired. We believe this acquisition will enable us to expand our accessories business in the private label arena with value priced customers.
18
The following tables set forth certain selected financial information relating to the results of operations for the periods indicated:
Selected Financial InformationThree Months EndedJune 30($ in thousands)
CONSOLIDATED:
100
%
57
58
43
42
Other operating income – net of expenses
37,553
32
36,593
34
Interest and other income – net
Income before income taxes
By Segment:
WHOLESALE SEGMENT:
55,718
63
51,904
37
35
20,922
24
18,542
23
RETAIL SEGMENT:
11,191
40
11,876
60
16,631
59
18,051
Number of stores
92
98
FIRST COST SEGMENT:
Other commission income – net of expenses
LICENSING SEGMENT:
Licensing income – net of expenses
19
Selected Financial InformationSix Months EndedJune 30($ in thousands)
41
73,641
33
77,327
106,025
99,178
64
36
38,992
41,064
24,826
46
24,926
45
54
34,649
36,263
66
(9
(11
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS($ in thousands)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
Consolidated:
Net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2009 increased by 7% to $116,472 from $109,317 for the comparable period of 2008. A net sales increase of 11% in the Wholesale Segment was partially offset by a net sales decrease of 5% in the Retail Segment. Our gross margin improved in the second quarter of 2009 to 43% compared to 42% in the same period of last year. Operating expenses increased in the second quarter of this year to $37,553 from $36,593 in the same period last year. As a percentage of sales, operating expenses decreased to 32% in the second quarter of 2009 from 34% in the same period of last year. Our commission and licensing fee income increased to $7,362 in the second quarter of 2009 compared to $3,203 in the second quarter of 2008. Income from operations and net income both increased by 59% in the second quarter of 2009 when compared to the second quarter of 2008. Income from operations was $19,372 and net income was $12,144 in the second quarter of this year compared to income from operations of $12,147 and net income of $7,634 in the same period last year.
20
Wholesale Segment:
Net sales from the Wholesale Segment accounted for $88,197 or 76%, and $79,426 or 73% of our total net sales for the second quarter of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The 11% increase in net sales was driven primarily by significant net sales increases in two divisions of our Wholesale Segment. Net sales in our Steve Madden Women’s Division increased by 16% primarily due to the strong performance of flat sandals, particularly thongs, during the quarter. The Madden Girl Division continued its growth trend from 2008 by posting a net sales increase of 14%. This net sales increase in Madden Girl was due to the strong performance at retail of flat shoes and sandals combined with an increased door count with department stores such as Macy’s. In addition, net sales increased in our Kids Division, primarily due to the growth in our business with Justice, a 900 door specialty retailer. Finally, Elizabeth and James and Fabulosity, our new brands that were not in existence in the second quarter of last year, contributed net sales of $832 and $806, respectively, in the second quarter of 2009. Net sales for the second quarter of 2009 were also impacted by the previously mentioned shifts related to our Candies and international businesses. The net effect of the shift of our Candies business from a “wholesale” model to a “first cost” model, and the reverse shift of our international business from a “first cost” model to a “wholesale” model, was an increase of net sales of $942 in the second quarter of 2009. The sales increases outlined above were partially offset by a 7% net sales decrease in the Madden Men’s Division, primarily due to the general softness in the men’s casual category.
Gross profit margin in the Wholesale Segment increased to 37% in the second quarter of this year from 35% in the same period last year, primarily due to a decrease in markdown allowances to our retail customers and savings in our inbound freight costs. In the second quarter of 2009, operating expenses increased to $20,922 from $18,542 in the second quarter last year, primarily due to an increase in the provision for incentive based compensation reflective of the Company’s increase in profitability, and an increase in non-cash, stock based compensation. As a result of the increases in sales and gross margin as offset by higher operating expense, income from operations for the Wholesale Segment increased to $11,557 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to $8,980 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2008.
Retail Segment:
In the second quarter of 2009, net sales from the Retail Segment accounted for $28,275 or 24% of our total net sales compared to $29,891 or 27% in the same period last year. We opened three new stores and closed nine under-performing stores during the twelve months ended June 30, 2009. As a result, we had 92 retail stores as of June 30, 2009 compared to 98 stores as of June 30, 2008. The 92 stores currently in operation include 87 under the Steve Madden brand, four under the Steven brand and one e-commerce website. Comparable store sales (sales of those stores, including the e-commerce website, that were open throughout the second quarters of 2009 and 2008) decreased 5.4% in the second quarter of this year. The net sales decrease was primarily due to unseasonably cool spring weather in the northeast that depressed sandal sales as well as the general softness in the retail environment. During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, gross margin remained unchanged from the same period in 2008 at 60%. In the second quarter of 2009, operating expenses decreased to $16,631 or 59% as a percentage of net sales, from $18,051 or 60% as a percentage of net sales, in the second quarter last year. The decrease in operating expenses is due to a reduction of payroll, rent, depreciation and other overhead expenses related to the six fewer stores in operation during the second quarter of 2009 compared with the same period of last year, in addition to other operating efficiencies put in place. Income from operations for the Retail Segment was $453 in the second quarter of this year compared to a loss from operations of $36 for the same period in 2008.
First Cost Segment:
The First Cost Segment generated net commission income and design fees of $6,389 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009, compared to $2,500 for the comparable period of 2008. The main drivers of the increase were first, the shift of our Candies business to the First Cost Segment, followed by the success of our new l.e.i. brand at Wal-mart that began shipping in the fourth quarter of 2008, in addition to a growth in our private label business with Target.
21
Licensing Segment:
During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, licensing income increased to $973 from $703 in the same period of last year, primarily due to an increase in sales by several of our licensees.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
A 9% increase in net sales in the Wholesale Segment that was partially offset by a 1% decrease in net sales in the Retail Segment drove total net sales for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 up 7% to $223,901 from $209,856 for the comparable period of 2008. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, gross margin improved to 42% compared to 41% in the same period of last year. An increase in the Wholesale gross profit margin to 37% in the first six months of this year compared to 36% in the same period last year was partially offset by a decrease in the Retail gross profit margin to 54% in the first six months of this year from 55% in the same period last year. Operating expenses decreased in the first half of this year to $73,641 from $77,327 in the same period last year. The decrease is due to $4,921 of charges related to the resignation of our former Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board in March of last year, and was partially offset by an increase in the provision for incentive based compensation reflective of the Company’s increase in profitability. Commission and licensing fee income increased to $10,267 in the first six months of 2009 compared to $6,559 in the first six months of 2008. Net income increased to $18,721 in the first six months of this year compared to $9,686 in the same period last year.
Net sales from the Wholesale Segment accounted for $169,482 or 76%, and $154,986 or 74% of our total net sales for the first six months of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase in sales was driven by the strong performance of our Madden Girl and Steve Madden Women’s Divisions. The Madden Girl Division continued its growth trend from 2008 by posting a net sales increase of 16%. This net sales increase in Madden Girl was due to the strong performance at retail of flat shoes and sandals in the second quarter combined with an increased door count with Macy’s. Net sales in the Steve Madden Women’s Division increased by 13% primarily due to the strong performance of flat sandals and wedges during the period. Net sales also increased 4% in our Accessories business and 2% in our Kids Division. Finally, Elizabeth and James and Fabulosity, our new brands that were not in existence in the first half of last year, contributed net sales of $832 and $761, respectively, in the six months ended June 30, 2009. Net sales for the second quarter of 2009 were also impacted by the previously mentioned shifts related to our Candies and International businesses. The net effect of the shift of our Candies business from a “wholesale” model to a “first cost” model, and the reverse shift of our international business from a “first cost” model to a “wholesale” model, was an increase of net sales of $1,274 during the six months ended June 30, 2009. The sales increases outlined above were partially offset by a 10% net sales decrease in the Madden Men’s Division, primarily due to the general softness in the men’s casual category.
Gross profit margin increased to 37% in the first six months of this year from 36% in the same period last year, primarily due to a decrease in markdown allowances to our retail customers and savings in our inbound freight costs. In the first six months of 2009, operating expenses decreased to $38,992 from $41,064 in the same period of 2008. The decrease is due to $4,921 of charges related to the resignation of our former Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board in March of last year, and was partially offset by an increase in the provision for incentive based compensation reflective of the Company’s increase in profitability. Income from operations for the Wholesale Segment increased 60% to $24,465 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to $14,744 for the same period of 2008.
22
In the first six months of 2009, net sales from the Retail Segment accounted for $54,419 or 24% of our total net sales compared to $54,870 or 26% in the same period last year. We opened three new stores and closed nine under-performing stores during the twelve months ended June 30, 2009. As a result, we had 92 retail stores as of June 30, 2009 compared to 98 stores as of June 30, 2008. The 92 stores currently in operation include 87 under the Steve Madden brand, four under the Steven brand and one e-commerce website. Comparable store sales (sales of those stores, including the e-commerce website, that were open throughout the first six months of 2009 and 2008) increased 0.9% in the first six months of this year. The gross margin in the Retail Segment decreased to 54% in the six months ended June 30, 2009 from 55% in the corresponding six months of 2008 primarily due to an increase in promotional activity required to sell slow moving inventory. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, operating expenses decreased to $34,649 or 63% as a percentage of net sales, from $36,263 or 66% as a percentage of net sales, in the same period of last year. The decrease in operating expenses is primarily due to a reduction of payroll, rent, depreciation and other overhead expenses related to the six fewer stores in operation during the second quarter of 2009 compared with the same period of last year, in addition to other operating efficiencies put in place. Loss from operations for the Retail Segment was $5,056 in the first six months of this year compared to a loss from operations of $6,319 for the same period in 2008.
The First Cost Segment generated net commission income and design fees of $8,457 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to $4,840 for the comparable period of 2008. The main drivers of the increase were first, the shift of our Candies business to the First Cost Segment, followed by the success of our new l.e.i. brand with Wal-mart that we began shipping in the fourth quarter of 2008, in addition to a growth in our private label business with Target.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, licensing income increased to $1,810 from $1,719 in the same period of last year.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES($ in thousands)
Our working capital decreased to $118,846 at June 30, 2009 compared to $122,246 at December 31, 2008. The decrease was primarily due to our increased investment in long-term marketable securities of $27,224, net, during the first half of the year.
Under the terms of our factoring agreement with GMAC Commercial Finance LLC (“GMAC”), as amended, we may request advances from the factor of up to 85% of aggregate receivables factored by GMAC. This agreement, which has no specific expiration date and can be terminated by either party with 60 days written notice after June 30, 2009, provides us with a $50,000 credit facility with a $25,000 sub-limit on the aggregate face amount of letters of credit with some other stipulations. In November of 2008, we borrowed the maximum amount allowed by the terms of the agreement. As of December 31, 2008, we had advances payable due to GMAC of $30,168 against gross factored receivables of $44,082. Subsequent to the year end, we began reducing the loan balance with the proceeds from the collections of factored accounts receivable, and as of February 17, 2009, the loan was completely paid off. The interest rate on the advances, which has changed from time to time by amendments to the agreement and which is currently a variable rate based on the 30-day London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), averaged 3.9% through the date of repayment. On July 13, 2009, we terminated the GMAC Agreement, effective on September 14, 2009.
On July 10, 2009, we entered into a collection agency agreement with Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc., effective upon the termination of the existing factoring agreement with GMAC. The agreement provides us with a credit facility in the amount of $30,000, having a sub-limit of $15,000 on the aggregate face amount of letters of credit, at an interest rate based, at our election, upon either the prime rate or LIBOR.
As of June 30, 2009, we held marketable securities valued at $58,359 consisting primarily of corporate and municipal bonds, U.S. Treasury notes and equities.
Management believes that, based upon our current financial position and available cash and marketable securities, we will meet all of our financial commitments and operating needs for at least the next twelve months.
OPERATING ACTIVITIES($ in thousands)
During the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, net cash provided in operating activities was $21,867. The primary sources of cash was the net income of $18,721, a decrease in inventory of $2,572 and an increase in accounts payable and other accrued expenses of $10,845. The primary uses of cash were an increase in accounts receivable of $3,350 and an increase in due from factor of $14,811.
INVESTING ACTIVITIES($ in thousands)
During the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, we invested $33,736 in marketable securities and received $10,678 from the maturities and sales of securities. We also invested $4,526 in additional acquisition costs associated with our acquisition of Daniel M. Friedman. Additionally, we made capital expenditures of $1,644, principally for the remodeling of six existing stores, the one new store opened in the current period, leasehold improvements to our corporate office space and enhancements to operating systems.
FINANCING ACTIVITIES($ in thousands)
During the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, we repaid advances from factor totaling $30,168. We also received $1,210 in cash and realized a tax benefit of $7 in connection with the exercise of stock options.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS($ in thousands)
Our contractual obligations as of June 30, 2009 were as follows:
Payment due by period
Contractual Obligations
Remainder of2009
2010-2011
2012-2013
2014 and after
Operating lease obligations
111,696
8,815
33,064
28,617
41,200
Purchase obligations
59,250
Other long-term liabilities (future minimum royalty payments)
4,448
150
4,135
163
175,394
68,215
37,199
28,780
At June 30, 2009, we had un-negotiated open letters of credit for the purchase of inventory of approximately $3,327.
We have an employment agreement with Steven Madden, our Creative and Design Chief and a principal stockholder of the Company, which provides for an annual base salary of $600 subject to certain specified adjustments through June 30, 2015. The agreement also provides for annual bonuses based on EBITDA, revenue of any new business and royalty income over $2,000, plus an equity grant and a non-accountable expense allowance.
We have employment agreements with certain executive officers, which provide for the payment of compensation aggregating approximately $1,210 for the remaining six months of 2009 and $940 in 2010. In addition, some of the employment agreements provide for a discretionary bonus and some provide for incentive compensation based on various performance criteria as well as other benefits including stock options. Our Chief Operating Officer is entitled to deferred compensation calculated as a percentage of his base salary.
Ninety-nine percent (99%) of our products are produced at by manufacturing companies overseas, the majority of which are located in China, with a small percentage located in Brazil, Italy, India, Spain and Mexico. We have not entered into any long-term manufacturing or supply contracts with any of these foreign companies. We believe that a sufficient number of alternative sources exist outside of the United States for the manufacture of our products. We currently make approximately 99% of our purchases in U.S. dollars.
INFLATION
We do not believe that the inflation experienced over the last few years in the United States, where we primarily compete, has had a significant effect on our sales or profitability. Historically, we have minimized the impact of product cost increases by improving operating efficiencies, changing suppliers and increasing prices. However, no assurance can be given that we will be able to offset such inflationary cost increases in the future.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMNTS
The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND THE USE OF ESTIMATES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is based upon our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim periods. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, sales and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Estimates by their nature are based on judgments and available information. Our estimates are made based upon historical factors, current circumstances and the experience and judgment of management. Assumptions and estimates are evaluated on an ongoing basis and we may employ outside experts to assist in evaluations. Therefore, actual results could materially differ from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions. Management believes the following critical accounting estimates are more significantly affected by judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements: allowance for bad debts, returns, and customer chargebacks; inventory reserves; valuation of intangible assets; litigation reserves and cost of sales.
Allowances for bad debts, returns and customer chargebacks. We provide reserves against our trade accounts receivables for future customer chargebacks, co-op advertising allowances, discounts, returns and other miscellaneous deductions that relate to the current period. The reserve against our non-factored trade receivables also includes estimated losses that may result from customers’ inability to pay. The amount of the reserve for bad debts, returns, discounts and compliance chargebacks are determined by analyzing aged receivables, current economic conditions, the prevailing retail environment and historical dilution levels for customers. We evaluate anticipated customer markdowns and advertising chargebacks by reviewing several performance indicators for our major customers. These performance indicators (which include inventory levels at the retail floors, sell through rates and gross margin levels) are analyzed by key account executives and the Vice President of Wholesale Sales to estimate the amount of the anticipated customer allowance. Failure to correctly estimate the amount of the reserve could materially impact our results of operations and financial position.
Inventory reserves. Inventories are stated at lower of cost or market, on a first-in, first-out basis. We review inventory on a regular basis for excess and slow moving inventory. The review is based on an analysis of inventory on hand, prior sales, and expected net realizable value through future sales. The analysis includes a review of inventory quantities on hand at period-end in relation to year-to-date sales and projections for sales in the foreseeable future as well as subsequent sales. We consider quantities on hand in excess of estimated future sales to be at risk for market impairment. The net realizable value, or market value, is determined based on the estimate of sales prices of such inventory through off-price or discount store channels. The likelihood of any material inventory write-down is dependent primarily on the expectation of future consumer demand for our product. A misinterpretation or misunderstanding of future consumer demand for our product, the economy, or other failure to estimate correctly, in addition to abnormal weather patterns, could result in inventory valuation changes, either favorably or unfavorably, compared to the valuation determined to be appropriate as of the balance sheet date.
25
Valuation of intangible assets. SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives no longer be amortized, but rather be tested for impairment at least annually. This pronouncement also requires that intangible assets with finite lives be amortized over their respective lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144 “Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets”. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, long-lived assets, such as property, equipment, leasehold improvements and goodwill subject to amortization are reviewed for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.
Litigation reserves. Estimated amounts for litigation claims that are probable and can be reasonably estimated are recorded as liabilities in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The likelihood of a material change in these estimated reserves would be dependent on new claims as they may arise and the favorable or unfavorable events of a particular litigation. As additional information becomes available, management will assess the potential liability related to the pending litigation and revise their estimates. Such revisions in management’s estimates of a contingent liability could materially impact our results of operations and financial position.
Cost of sales. All costs incurred to bring finished products to our distribution center and, in the Retail Division, the costs to bring products to our stores, are included in the cost of sales line item on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. These include the cost of finished products, purchase commissions, letter of credit fees, brokerage fees, material and labor and related items, sample expenses, custom duty, inbound freight, royalty payments on licensed products, labels and product packaging. All warehouse and distribution costs are included in the operating expenses line item of our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. We classify shipping costs to customers, if any, as operating expense. Our gross profit margins may not be comparable to other companies in the industry because some companies may include warehouse and distribution costs as a component of cost of sales, while other companies report on the same basis as we do and include them in operating expenses.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK($ in thousands)
We do not engage in the trading of market risk sensitive instruments in the normal course of business. Our financing arrangements are subject to variable interest rates, primarily based on the prime rate and LIBOR. An analysis of our credit agreements with GMAC and Rosenthal and Rosenthal can be found in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section under Part I, Item 2 of this Report.
As of June 30, 2009, we held marketable securities valued at $58,359, consisting primarily of corporate and municipal bonds, U.S. treasury notes and marketable equity securities. These investments are subject to interest rate risk and will decrease in value if market interest rates increase. We have the ability to hold these investments until maturity. In addition, any decline in interest rates would be expected to reduce our interest income.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the fiscal quarter covered by this quarterly report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were, as of the end of the fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report, effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As required by Rule 13a-15(d) under the Exchange Act, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated our internal controls over financial reporting to determine whether any changes occurred during the quarter covered by this quarterly report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Based on that evaluation, there has been no such change during the quarter covered by this report.
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS($ in thousands)
Certain legal proceedings in which we are involved are discussed in Note L to our Condensed Consolidated Financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and in Part I Item 3 of that Annual Report. All proceedings discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 which are not indicated therein as having been dismissed remain outstanding.
On or about June 15, 2009, we were named as a defendant in a class action lawsuit filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, California. The Complaint, which seeks unspecified damages, alleges violations of California Labor Laws. Specifically, it alleges that we failed to provide mandated breaks to our employees and failed to provide overtime pay as required. Management believes that it is not currently possible to assess whether or not there will be any impact at all from this action, or if there is, what effect the ultimate resolution of the matter might have on the results of operation, financial position or cash flows.
We have been named as a defendant in certain other lawsuits in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, after consulting with legal counsel, the liabilities, if any, resulting from these matters should not have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations. It is the policy of management to disclose the amount or range of reasonably possible losses in excess of recorded amounts.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The risk factors included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 have not materially changed.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
There were no unregistered sales of equity securities and we did not repurchase any of our common stock during the quarter ended June 30, 2009.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
At our Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 22, 2009 (the “Annual Meeting”), the stockholders of the Company ratified the appointment of Eisner LLP and approved the amendment and restatement of the Company’s 2006 Stock Incentive Plan. In addition, the stockholders of the Company elected six directors to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the total votes cast was required to ratify the appointment of Eisner LLP and to approve the amendment and restatement of the 2006 Stock Incentive of the Plan and the affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes cast by holders of shares of common stock was required to elect the directors.
With respect to the approval of the appointment of Eisner LLP, set forth below are the results of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting.
For
Against
Abstained
Appointment of Eisner LLP
15,576,532
1,049,325
343
With respect to the approval of the amendment to the Company’s 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, set forth below are the results of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting.
Broker non-votes
Adoption of the Amended and Restated 2006 Stock Incentive Plan
8,822,603
5,210,214
2,469
2,590,914
With respect to the election of directors, set forth below are the results of the votes cast and/or withheld with respect to each nominee. The nominees elected at our Annual Meeting are all of the members of our Board of Directors.
Nominees
Withheld
Edward R. Rosenfeld
16,360,860
265,340
John L. Madden
14,692,483
1,933,717
Peter Migliorini
16,361,962
264,238
Richard P. Randall
16,423,765
202,435
Ravi Sachdev
16,215,496
410,704
Thomas H. Schwartz
16,465,383
160,817
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
3.1
Certificate of Incorporation of Steven Madden, Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to Steven Madden, Ltd.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated November 23, 1998, Securities and Exchange Commission File Number 000-23702, Film Number 98757800).
3.2
Amended & Restated By-Laws of Steven Madden, Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Steven Madden, Ltd.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March 28, 2008).
4.1
Specimen Certificate for shares of Common Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.01 to Steven Madden, Ltd.’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2/A, dated September 29, 1993).
4.2
Rights Agreement between Steven Madden, Ltd. and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Steven Madden, Ltd.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 16, 2001, SEC File Number 000-23702, Film Number 1794721).
10.1
Second Amended and Restated Secured Promissory Note dated April 6, 2009 of Steven Madden to the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 10, 2009.
10.2
Collection Agency Agreement dated July 10, 2009 between Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 16, 2009).
10.3
Collection Agency Agreement dated July 10, 2009 between Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. and Daniel Friedman & Associates, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 16, 2009).
10.4
Collection Agency Agreement dated July 10, 2009 between Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. and Diva Acquisition Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 16, 2009).
10.5
Collection Agency Agreement dated July 10, 2009 between Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. and Steven Madden Retail, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 16, 2009).
10.6
Collection Agency Agreement dated July 10, 2009 between Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. and Stevies, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 16, 2009).
10.7
Collection Agency Agreement dated July 10, 2009 between Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. and SML Acquisition Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 16, 2009).
10.8
Letter Agreement dated July 10, 2009 among Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc., the Company, Daniel Friedman & Associates, Inc., Diva Acquisition Corp., Steven Madden Retail, Inc., Stevies, Inc., and SML Acquisition Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 16, 2009).
10.9
Guarantee dated July 10, 2009 of the Company, Daniel Friedman & Associates, Inc., Diva Acquisition Corp., Steven Madden Retail, Inc., Stevies, Inc., and SML Acquisition Corp. in favor of Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 16, 2009).
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 or 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.†
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 or 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.†
32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.†
32.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.†
29
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report on Form 10-Q to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
DATE: August 7, 2009
By:
/s/ EDWARD R. ROSENFELD
Chief Executive Officer
/s/ ARVIND DHARIA
Arvind Dharia
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit No.
Description