SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
ý
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002
OR
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO .
Commission file number 1-12431
Unity Bancorp, Inc.
(Exact Name of registrant as specified in its charter)
New Jersey
22-3282551
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. employer identification no.)
64 Old Highway 22, Clinton, NJ
08809
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code (908) 730-7630
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes o No ý
The number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrants classes of common equity stock, as of October 31, 2002:
Common stock, no par value: 5,238,376 shares outstanding
PART I
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1
Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2002, 2001 and December 31, 2001
Consolidated Statements Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 2
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
ITEM 3
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
ITEM 4
Controls and procedures
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Legal Proceedings
Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
Defaults upon Senior Securities
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
ITEM 5
Other Information
ITEM 6
Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
Exhibit Index
SIGNATURES
Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
2
Part 1.-Financial Information
Item 1.- Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
09/30/02
12/31/01
09/30/01
Assets
Cash and due from banks
$
14,686
16,832
12,973
Federal funds sold
20,000
12,000
Securities:
Available for sale
51,230
59,773
59,819
Held to maturity
25,218
20,923
22,238
Total securities
76,448
80,696
82,057
Loans:
SBA held for sale
14,124
17,719
15,019
SBA held to maturity
43,989
35,754
34,216
Commercial
154,321
119,262
97,649
Residential mortgage
64,189
73,144
78,066
Consumer
26,955
26,680
26,918
Total loans
303,578
272,559
251,868
Less: Allowance for loan losses
3,786
3,165
2,871
Net loans
299,792
269,394
248,997
Premises and equipment, net
8,772
8,567
8,812
Accrued interest receivable
2,368
2,261
2,445
Other assets
1,924
1,482
1,305
Total assets
424,990
379,232
368,589
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
Liabilities:
Deposits
Non-interest bearing
71,496
64,697
58,646
Interest bearing checking
165,017
119,864
111,075
Savings deposits
36,545
30,982
30,776
Time deposits, under $100,000
76,887
83,644
91,757
Time, $100,000 and over
24,149
40,767
37,717
Total deposits
374,094
339,954
329,971
Other debt
12,787
12,853
12,874
Trust preferred securities
9,000
Accrued interest payable
294
366
1,120
Accrued expense and other liabilities
1,145
1,223
951
Total liabilities
397,320
354,396
344,916
Commitments and contingencies
Shareholders equity
Preferred stock, class A, 10%, 104 shares authorized 6 issued and outstanding
285
Common stock, no par value, 12,500 shares authorized
32,159
33,248
32,702
Retained deficit
(6,015
)
(8,692
(9,632
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
241
(5
318
Total Shareholders Equity
26,670
24,836
23,673
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
Issued common shares
5,094
5,113
4,984
Outstanding common shares
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
3
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the three months ended September 30,
For the nine months ended September 30,
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
2002
2001
Interest income:
Fed funds sold and interest on deposits
69
132
130
965
564
877
2,084
2,456
362
368
1,083
1,207
926
1,245
3,167
3,663
SBA loans
922
880
2,706
2,537
Commercial loans
2,862
2,008
7,761
5,793
Residential mortgage loans
1,054
1,229
3,166
3,454
Consumer loans
394
469
1,172
1,512
Total loan interest income
5,232
4,586
14,805
13,296
Total interest income
6,227
5,963
18,102
17,924
Interest expense:
760
749
2,007
2,550
199
194
554
Time deposits
986
1,652
3,293
5,588
Total deposit interest expense
1,945
2,595
5,854
8,692
Borrowings
200
196
593
584
Total interest expense
2,145
2,791
6,447
9,276
Net interest income
4,082
3,172
11,655
8,648
Provision for loan losses
375
275
1,950
575
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
3,707
2,897
9,705
8,073
Non-interest Income:
Deposit service charges
407
286
1,116
935
Loan and servicing fees
363
322
1,082
923
Net gains on loan sales
729
485
2,614
1,537
Net security gains
34
228
68
Other income
123
206
835
471
Total non-interest income
1,622
1,333
5,875
3,934
Non-interest expense:
Compensation and benefits
1,867
1,760
5,605
5,071
Occupancy
422
405
1,228
1,242
Processing and communications
545
1,636
1,547
Furniture and equipment
271
283
820
816
Professional fees
204
151
515
563
Deposit insurance
42
39
119
463
Loan servicing costs
104
50
306
189
Other expenses
356
268
1,153
1,046
Total non-interest expense
3,830
3,501
11,382
10,937
Net income before provision for income taxes
1,499
4,198
1,070
Provision for income taxes
537
1,498
14
Net income
962
726
2,700
1,056
Preferred stock dividends
8
1,795
23
2,055
Net income (loss) to common shareholders
954
(1,069
2,677
(999
Net income (loss) per common share Basic
0.18
(0.23
0.51
(0.25
Net income (loss) per common share Diluted
0.17
0.48
Weighted average shares outstanding Basic
5,383
4,683
5,245
4,036
Weighted average shares outstanding Diluted
5,663
4,733
5,589
4,063
4
Unity Bancorp, Inc
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity
For the Nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001
(In thousands)
Preferred Stock
Common Stock
Treasury Stock
Retained Deficit
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (loss)
Balance, December 31, 2000
4,929
26,234
(1,762
(7,793
(294
21,314
Comprehensive income:
Net Income
Unrealized holding gain on securities arising during the period, net of tax $398
612
Total comprehensive income
1,668
Employee benefit plans
114
(65
49
Private placement offering
1,648
(1,045
642
Preferred stock exchange
(4,644
6,429
(1,785
Balance, September 30, 2001
Balance, December 31, 2001
Net unrealized holding gain on securities arising during the period, net of tax $116
246
2,946
(23
Warrant exercises (332 shares)
1,356
Benefit plans (18 shares)
102
Repurchase and retirement of common stock (369 shares)
(2,547
Balance, September 30, 2002
5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the nine months endedSeptember 30,
Operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization
872
734
Net gain on sale of securities
(228
(68
Gain on sale of SBA loans held for sale
(2,614
(1,537
Gain on sale of OREO
(36
Origination of SBA loans held for sale
(29,798
(31,915
Proceeds from the sale of SBA loans
36,007
25,175
Net change in other assets and liabilities
(901
3,086
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
7,988
(2,930
Investing activities:
Purchases of securities held to maturity
(10,502
(9,292
Purchases of securities available for sale
(28,072
(48,283
Maturities and principal payments on securities held to maturity
6,207
20,122
Maturities and principal payments on securities available for sale
24,634
18,564
Proceeds from sale of securities available for sale
12,605
8,762
Purchase of loans
(10,373
(11,610
Net increase in loans
(25,682
(6,197
Purchases in premises and equipment
(913
(145
Proceeds from of the sale of OREO
423
Net cash used in investing activities
(32,096
(27,656
Financing activities:
Increase in deposits
34,140
9,653
Decrease in borrowings
(66
(25
Issuance of Trust preferred securities
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock
1,458
691
Purchase of common stock
Dividends on preferred stock
Net cash provided by financing activities
41,962
10,319
Increase (Decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
17,854
(20,267
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
45,240
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
34,686
24,973
Supplemental disclosures:
Cash:
Interest paid
6,519
8,823
Income taxes paid
1,709
Non-Cash investing activities:
Transfer of loan to Other Real Estate Owned
53
6
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
September 30, 2002
NOTE 1. Organization and principles of consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Unity Bancorp, Inc. (the Parent Company) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Unity (NJ) Statutory Trust I and Unity Bank (the Bank, or when consolidated with the Parent Company, the Company), reflect all adjustments and disclosures which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of interim results. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts to conform to the current year presentation. The financial information has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and has not been audited. In preparing the financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the dates of the statements of financial condition and revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant changes related to the determination of the allowance for loan losses. Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate. While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, future additions to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions in the market. The interim unaudited consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared in accordance with instructions for Form 10-Q and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of the results, which may be expected for the entire year. As used in this Form 10-Q, we and us and our refer to Unity Bancorp, Inc and its consolidated subsidiaries, Unity Bank and Unity Statutory Trust, depending on the context. Interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2001, included in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K.
NOTE 2. Litigation
The Company may, in the ordinary course of business become a party to litigation involving collection matters, contract claims and other legal proceedings relating to the conduct of its business. The Company does not believe that any existing legal claims or proceedings will have a material impact on the Companys financial position, or results of operations.
NOTE 3. Earnings per share
The following is a reconciliation of the calculation of basic and dilutive earnings per share. Basic net income per common share is calculated by dividing net income to common shareholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share is computed similarly to that of basic net income per common share, except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if all potentially dilutive common shares, principally stock options and warrants, were issued during the reporting period.
(In thousands, except per share data)
Three months ended Sept. 30,
Nine months ended Sept. 30,
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding
Plus: Common stock equivalents
280
344
27
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
Net income (loss) per common share:
Basic
Diluted
7
NOTE 4. Recent accounting pronouncements
In October 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 147, Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions- an amendment to FASB Statements No. 72 and 144 and FASB Interpretation No. 9. This Statement removes acquisitions of financial institutions from the scope of both Statement 72 and Interpretation 9 and requires that those transactions be accounted for in accordance with FASB Statements No. 141,Business Combinations, and No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The provisions of Statement No. 147 that relate to the application of the purchase method of accounting apply to all acquisitions of financial institutions, except transactions between two or more mutual enterprises.
Statement No. 147 clarifies that a branch acquisition that meets the definition of a business should be accounted for as a business combination, otherwise the transaction should be accounted for as an acquisition of net assets that does not result in the recognition of goodwill. The provisions of Statement No. 147 are effective October 1, 2002. This Statement will have no effect on the Companys financial statements.
In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. The standard requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. The Statement is to be applied prospectively to exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002.
In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145. SFAS No. 145 among other things rescinds SFAS No. 4, Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishments of Debt. Under SFAS No. 4, gains and losses from the extinguishment of debt were required to be classified as an extraordinary item, if material. Under SFAS No. 145, gains or losses from the extinguishment of debt are to be classified as a component of operating income, rather than an extraordinary item. SFAS No. 145 is effective for fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002, with early adoption of the provisions related to the rescission of SFAS No. 4 encouraged. Upon adoption, companies must reclassify prior period amounts previously classified as an extraordinary item. Management does not anticipate that the initial adoption of SFAS 145 will have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 5. Business Combinations and Joint Ventures
On May 20, 2002 the Company announced that it has agreed to partner with Hallmark Title Insurance Agency. The Company will have a 40% ownership interest in a newly created title insurance agency located in Somerville NJ, and will perform core title agency services. Unitys investment is not material to its financial statements.
On August 20, 2002 Unity Bank reported that First Bank of Central Jersey (First Bank) and Unity had ended negotiations for a definitive agreement under which First Bank would have merged into Unity Bank. On June 12th, Unity Bank and First Bank had signed a letter of intent providing for such merger. After subsequent due diligence, both parties were unable to reach a definitive agreement and all negotiations have ended.
Note 6. Subsequent Events
All of the 1.1 million common stock purchase warrants issued on July 13, 2001, in connection with the Series A Preferred Stock exchange offer have been exercised and issued under the warrant terms. All of the warrants were to expire on October 16, 2002. Under the terms of the warrant agreement, each warrant permitted the holder to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price of $5.50. Alternatively, the warrants could also be exercised on a cashless basis by receiving common stock equal to the intrinsic value of the cancelled warrants. The intrinsic value of the warrants was defined as the difference between the $5.50 exercise price and the average closing market price of Unity five days prior to the exercise.
Of the 1.1 million warrants exercised, 495,736 warrants were exercised for $2.7 million in cash, and 615,673 warrants were exercised with the issuance of 118,758 shares. In total 614,494 common shares were issued with respect to the exercise of the warrants.
On October 20, 2002, the Company redeemed for $300,000 all of the outstanding 6,000 shares of the Companys 10% Series A Preferred Stock in accordance with its terms.
The Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of up to 500,000 shares common stock, no par value, which constitutes approximately 10% of the shares outstanding. Such purchases would be made from time to time over the next two years in open market transactions. The amount and timing of purchases will be dependent upon a number of factors, including the price and availability of the Companys shares, general market conditions and competing alternate uses of funds, and may be discontinued at any time.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes. When necessary, reclassifications have been made to prior period data throughout the following discussion and analysis for purposes of comparability. This quarterly Form 10-Q contains certain forward looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which may be identified by the use of such words as believe, expect, anticipate, should, planned, estimated and potential. Examples of forward looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to the financial condition, results of operations and business of Unity Bancorp, Inc. that are subject to various factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from these estimates. These factors include: changes in general, economic, and market conditions, legislative and regulatory conditions, or the development of an interest rate environment that adversely affects Unity Bancorp Inc.s interest rate spread or other income anticipated from operations and investments.
Overview and Strategy
Unity Bancorp, Inc. (the Parent Company) is incorporated in New Jersey and is a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. Its wholly owned subsidiary, Unity Bank (the Bank or, when consolidated with the Parent Company, the Company) was granted a charter by the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance and commenced operations on September 13, 1991. The Bank provides a full range of commercial and retail banking services through 12 branch offices located in Hunterdon, Somerset, Middlesex, and Union counties in New Jersey. These services include the acceptance of demand, savings, and time deposits; extension of consumer, real estate, Small Business Administration and other commercial credits, as well as personal investment advisory services through the Banks wholly owned subsidiary, Unity Financial Services, Inc. Unity Investment Company, Inc. is also a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank, used to hold part of the Banks investment portfolio.
9
Consolidated Average Balance Sheets with resultant Interest and Rates
(Tax-equivalent basis, dollars in thousands)
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2001
Balance
Interest
Rate
Interest-earning assets:
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits with banks
17,003
1.61
%
17,457
3.00
50,131
4.50
58,256
6.02
23,570
6.14
23,607
6.24
73,701
5.03
81,863
6.08
Loans, net of unearned discount:
57,908
6.37
42,666
8.25
151,342
7.50
94,946
8.39
Residential Mortgages
67,319
6.26
80,027
26,644
5.87
27,334
6.81
303,213
6.87
244,973
7.45
Total interest-earning assets
393,917
6.30
344,293
6.90
Noninterest-earning assets:
12,408
9,302
Allowance for loan losses
(3,805
(2,769
12,166
12,881
Total noninterest-earning assets
20,769
19,414
Total Assets
414,686
363,707
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing checking
163,065
1.85
110,655
2.69
35,894
2.20
31,729
2.43
106,054
3.69
125,615
5.22
Total interest-bearing deposits
305,013
2.53
267,999
3.84
Other borrowed funds
13,315
5.96
12,882
6.04
Total interest-bearing liabilities
318,328
2.67
280,881
3.94
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits
65,866
58,626
Other liabilities
2,233
1,834
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities
68,099
60,460
28,259
22,366
Net interest spread
3.63
2.96
Tax-equivalent basis adjustment
Net interest margin
4.15
10
Nine months Ended
10,877
1.60
28,656
53,210
53,751
6.09
22,994
6.28
25,456
76,204
5.54
80,207
55,565
6.49
36,699
9.22
139,868
7.42
89,085
8.69
69,898
76,820
5.99
26,473
5.92
28,200
7.17
291,804
6.78
230,804
7.69
378,885
6.38
339,667
7.04
13,051
10,427
(3,557
(2,678
12,117
13,483
21,611
21,232
400,496
360,899
144,160
1.86
107,476
3.17
33,494
2.21
31,139
2.38
116,996
3.76
130,514
5.72
294,650
2.66
269,129
4.32
13,591
5.83
12,896
6.05
308,241
2.80
282,025
4.40
63,651
55,602
1,899
65,550
57,100
26,705
21,774
3.58
2.64
4.10
3.39
11
Results of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002
Net income for the three months ended September 30, 2002, was $962 thousand, or $0.18 per basic and $0.17 per diluted common share, compared to a net income of $726 thousand, or $0.23 loss per basic and diluted common share for the same period in 2001. Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, was $2.7 million, or $0.51 per basic and $0.48 per diluted share, compared to a net income of $1.1 million, or $0.25 loss per basic and diluted share for the same period in 2001. In the third quarter of 2001, a one time preferred dividend of $1.8 million was recorded as a result of the preferred stock exchange offer for the Companys common stock and warrants. As a result, the Company reported a loss to common shareholders in the third quarter of 2001 of $0.23 per basic and diluted common share and a loss of $0.25 per basic and diluted share for the nine months ended 2001. The improved operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 were primarily the result of increases in net interest income and non-interest income, and continued expense controls. The following are key performance indicators for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, and 2001.
Three Months ended Sept. 30,
Net Income (loss) to common stockholders
Net Income (loss) per common share-basic
Net Income (loss) per common share-diluted
Performance Ratios:
Return on average assets
0.92
0.79
0.90
0.39
Return on average common equity
13.53
(19.75
13.55
(7.34
Efficiency ratio
67.15
78.30
65.78
87.40
Net Interest Income
Interest income was $6.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002, an increase of $0.2 million or 0.6 percent compared to $6.0 million a year ago. Interest-earning assets averaged $393.9 million, an increase of $49.6 million, or 14.4 percent, compared to the prior year period. The increases in average earning assets occurred due to a $58.2 million increase in the loan portfolio, partially offset by a decrease of $8.2 million in securities available for sale. The rate earned on interest-earning assets decreased 60 basis points to 6.30 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2002, compared to the same period a year ago, due to a lower rate environment. The increase in interest income is attributable to a $1.0 million increase in interest earning assets, offset by a decline of $767 thousand due to the reduction in yield.
Interest expense was $2.1 million, a decrease of $646 thousand or 23.1 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2002, compared to $2.8 million the same period a year ago. Interest-bearing liabilities averaged $318.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002, an increase of $37.4 million, or 13.3 percent, compared to $280.9 million for the prior year period. The increases in average interest bearing liabilities were the result of an increase in interest-bearing deposits. The rate paid on interest bearing liabilities decreased 127 basis points from the same period in 2001 to 2.67 percent. Total interest-bearing deposits were $305.0 million, an increase of $37.0 million or 13.8 percent compared to $268.0 million from the same period a year ago. The increase in interest-bearing deposits was as a result of increases in interest-bearing demand deposits, partially offset by the planned reduction of higher costing time deposits. The rate paid on interest bearing deposits was 2.53 percent for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, a decrease of 1.31 basis points from the same period a year ago
Net interest income was $4.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002, an increase of $910 thousand, or 28.7 percent, compared to the $3.2 million from the same period a year ago. The rise in net interest income was due to the increase in net interest spread earned on a larger portfolio of net earning assets. The net interest spread (the difference between the rate earned on average interest-earning assets and the rate paid on average interest-bearing liabilities) was 3.63 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2002 compared to 2.96 for the same period a year ago. Net interest margin (net interest income as a percentage of average interest earning assets) was 4.15 percent for the quarter compared to 3.69 percent for the same period a year ago.
12
Interest income was $18.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, an increase of 178 thousand, or 1.0 percent compared to $17.9 million a year ago. Interest-earning assets averaged $378.9 million, an increase of $39.2 million, or 11.5 percent, compared to $339.7 million in the prior year period. The increases in average earning assets occurred primarily due to the $61.0 million increase in the loan portfolio, partially offset by a decrease of $17.8 million in Federal funds sold and $4.0 million in investment securities. The rate earned on interest-earning assets decreased 66 basis points to 6.38 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared to the same period a year ago, primarily due to a lower rate environment. The increase in interest earning assets contributed $3.0 million to the increase in interest income, partially offset by the $2.8 million decline due to yield.
Interest expense was $6.4 million a decrease $2.8 million, or 30.5 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared to $9.3 million the same period a year ago. Interest-bearing liabilities averaged $308.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, an increase of $26.2 million or 9.3 percent compared to the prior year period. The increase in average interest bearing liabilities occurred primarily in interest-bearing deposits. The increase in interest-bearing liabilities contributed $246 thousand in additional interest expense more than offset by the decline of $3.1 million in interest expense as a result of lower rates paid on interest bearing liabilities. The rate paid on interest bearing liabilities decreased 1.60 basis points to 2.80 percent. Total interest-bearing deposits were $294.7 million, an increase of $25.5 million or 9.5 percent compared to $269.1 million the same period a year ago. The increase in interest-bearing deposits was as a result of an increase in interest bearing demand deposits offset by the planned reduction in higher costing time deposits. The rate paid on interest bearing deposits was 2.66 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, a decrease of 166 basis points from last year.
Net interest income was $11.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, an increase of $3.0 million, or 34.8 percent, compared to $8.6 million from the same period a year ago. The rise in net interest income was due to the increase in net interest spread and increased levels of net earning assets. The net interest spread (the difference between the rate earned on average interest-earning assets and the rate paid on average interest-bearing liabilities) was 3.58 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 compared to 2.64 percent for the same period a year ago. Net interest margin (net interest income as a percentage of average interest earning assets) was 4.10 percent for the nine months ended compared to 3.39 percent for the same period a year ago.
The rate volume table below presents an analysis of the impact on interest income and expense resulting from changes in average volume and rates over the periods presented. Changes that are not due to volume or rate variances have been allocated proportionally to both, based on their relative absolute values. Amounts have been computed on a full tax-equivalent basis, assuming a federal income tax rate of 34.0 percent.
Rate Volume Table
Amount of Increase (Decrease)
Three months ended Sept. 30, 2002
Nine months ended Sept 30, 2002
versus Sept. 30, 2001
versus Sept 30, 2001
Due to change in:
Volume
Total
Interest Income
(229
1,061
(892
169
SBA
1,086
(232
854
2,913
(945
1,968
(199
24
(175
(316
28
(288
(12
(63
(75
(89
(251
(340
Total Loans
1,146
(500
646
3,569
(2,060
1,509
Available for sale securities
(111
(202
(313
(347
(372
Held to maturity securities
(1
(6
(163
(124
Federal funds sold and interest bearing deposits
(3
(60
(409
(426
(835
Total Interest Earning assets
1,031
(767
264
2,972
(2,794
178
Interest Expense
289
(278
707
(1,250
(543
25
(20
41
(41
(231
(435
(666
(533
(2,295
Total Interest Bearing Deposits
83
(733
(650
215
(3,053
(2,838
31
(22
90
(736
(646
(3,075
(2,829
941
(31
910
2,726
281
3,007
Increase in net interest income
13
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses was $375 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2002, an increase of $100 thousand, compared to $275 thousand for the same period a year ago. The provision for loan losses was $2.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, an increase of $1.4 million compared to $575 thousand for the same period a year ago. The increase from a year ago was primarily attributable to increased charge offs, the increase in past due loans and the increase and change in the composition of the loan portfolio. See Financial Condition-Asset Quality. The provision is based on managements assessment of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, described under the caption Financial Condition-Allowance for Loan Losses. The current provision is considered appropriate under the assessment of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.
Non-Interest Income
Three months ended September, 30
Nine months ended September 30,
Percent
Change
42.3
19.4
12.7
17.2
50.3
70.1
235.3
(40.3
77.3
21.7
49.3
Non-interest income consists of service charges on deposits, loan and servicing fees, net gains on sales of securities and loans and other income. Non-interest income was $1.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002, an increase of $289 thousand compared with 2001, and was $5.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, an increase of $2.0 million, compared to the same period a year ago.
Deposit service charges increased $121 thousand, or 42.3 percent, for the three months ended September 30, 2002, compared to the same period a year ago, and increased $181 thousand, or 19.4 percent, for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared with the same period a year ago. Deposit service charges increased for the three and nine months as a result of higher fees and the growth in the deposit base.
Loan and servicing fees increased $41 thousand, or 12.7 percent, for the three months ended September 30, 2002, and increased $159 thousand, or 17.2 percent, for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The growth in loan and servicing fees for the three and nine months ended is attributed to the growth of the serviced SBA loan portfolio, which amounted to $122.9 million at September 30, 2002, compared to $99.6 million at September 30, 2001.
Net gains on loan sales include participation in the SBAs guaranteed loan program. Under the program, the SBA guarantees up to 85 percent of the principal of a qualifying loan. The guaranteed portion of the loan is then sold into the secondary market. The premium received on the sale of the loans sold is recorded as a gain on the sale. SBA loan sales, all without recourse, totaled $9.4 million in the three months ended, and $33.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared to $7.5 million and $23.6 million, respectively, for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2001. Gains on SBA loan sales were $729 million for the three months ended, and $2.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 compared to $485 thousand and $1.5 million, respectively, for the same periods a year ago. The increase in gains on the sale of SBA loans is a result of the increase of SBA loans being sold and higher premiums received on sales.
On October 1, 2002, the SBA passed its appropriation bill for fiscal year 2003. Included it the appropriation bill is a limit of $500,000 on the total dollar amount for all 7(a) loans approved to small business and its affiliates. Historically the majority of the SBA 7(a) loans made by the Company have been in excess of $500,000. Going forward the Company expects that the $500,000 limitation on loan size will reduce the amount of gains on SBA loan sales.
Other non-interest income decreased $83 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2002, compared with 2001 and increased $364 thousand for the nine months then ended, compared with the same period a year ago. The decrease for the three months ended was primarily due to a decrease in commercial loan referral fees which amounted to $10 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2001, compared to $93 thousand for the same period a year ago. The increase for the nine months ended is primarily due to an increase in commercial loan referral fees which amounted to $501 thousand the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared to $169 thousand for the same period a year ago.
Three months ended September 30,
6.1
10.5
4.2
(1.1
3.5
5.8
(4.2
0.5
Professional services
35.1
(8.5
7.7
(74.3
108.0
61.9
32.8
10.2
9.4
4.1
Compensation and benefits expense decreased $107 thousand, or 6.1 percent, for the three months ended September 30, 2002, compared to the same period a year ago, and increased $534 thousand, or 10.5 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared to the same period a year ago. The increase in compensation and benefits was a result of merit increases effective January 1, 2002, compensation incentives not awarded in 2001 and the increase in the number of employees. Total employees amounted to 149 at September 30, 2002, compared to 145 at September 30, 2001.
Occupancy expense increased $17 thousand, or 4.2 percent, for the three months ended September 30, 2002, compared to the same period a year ago, and decreased $14 thousand, or 1.1 percent, for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared to the same period a year ago. The increase for the three months ended was due to higher property taxes, depreciation and maintenance expenses. The decrease for the nine month periods is related to lower maintenance costs.
Processing and communications expense increased $19 thousand, or 3.5 percent, for the three months ended September 30, 2002, compared to the same period a year ago, and increased $89 thousand, or 5.8 percent, for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared to the same period a year ago. The increase for the three and nine month periods is primarily as a result of higher items processing costs related to the growth in the deposit and loan portfolios and the increase in postage expense due the increase in rates that was effective July 1, 2002.
Furniture and equipment expense decreased $12 thousand, or 4.2 percent, for the three months ended September 30, 2002, compared to the same period a year ago, and was flat for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared to the same period a year ago. The decline in furniture and equipment for the three months ended is primarily related to lower depreciation expense.
Professional fees increased $53 thousand, or 35.1 percent, for the three months ended September 30, 2002, compared to the same period a year ago, and decreased $48 thousand, or 8.5 percent, for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared to the same period a year ago. The increase for the three months ended is due to legal and consulting fees related to the due diligence conducted on the terminated First Bank merger. The decrease for the nine months ended is due to reduced legal and accounting costs.
Deposit insurance increased $3 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2002, compared to the same period a year ago, and decreased $344 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared to the same period a year ago. The increase for the three months ended is due to the increase in the deposit base. The decrease for the nine months ended is due to a reduced insurance assessment related to the Companys improved financial and regulatory condition.
Loan servicing expense increased $54 thousand, or 108.0 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2002, compared to the same period a year ago, and increased $117 thousand, or 61.9 percent, for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared to the same period a year ago. The increase in loan servicing expenses for the current three and nine month periods is primarily related to higher legal costs related to loan collections on the commercial portfolio.
Other expense increased $88 thousand, or 32.8 percent, for the three months ended September 30, 2002, compared to the same period a year ago, and increased $107 thousand, or 10.2 percent, for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared to the same period a year ago. The increase is the result of higher advertising expenses and increased director fees.
Income Tax Expense
For the third quarter of 2002, the provision for income taxes was $537 thousand compared to $3 thousand for the same period a year ago and $1.5 million for the nine months ended compared to $14 thousand for the same period a year ago. In 2001, the Company reversed tax valuation reserves to substantially offset tax expense. The current 2002 tax provision represents an effective tax rate of approximately 36 percent. Management anticipates an effective rate of 36 percent for the remainder of 2002 and a slightly higher rate in 2003.
15
Financial Condition at September 30, 2002
Total assets at September 30, 2002 were $424.0 million compared to $368.6 million a year ago and $379.2 million from year-end 2001. The increases in assets were the result of deposit generation used to fund loan growth.
Securities available for sale were $51.2 million at September 30, 2002, a decrease of $8.5 million, or 14.3 percent from year-end 2001. During the first nine months of 2002, $28.1 million of securities available for sale were purchased, partially offset by $24.6 million of maturities and paydowns and $12.6 million in securities sales. The yield on securities available for sale was 5.22 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared to 6.09 percent a year ago, reflecting declines in market rates of interest.
Securities held to maturity were $25.2 million at September 30, 2002, an increase of $4.3 million, or 20.5 percent, from year-end 2001. During the first nine months of 2002, $10.5 million of held to maturity securities were purchased and primarily funded by $6.2 million of maturities and paydowns. The yield on securities held to maturity was 6.28 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 compared to 6.08 for the same period a year ago, reflecting the maturity of lower yielding investments. As of September 30, 2002, and December 31, 2001 the market value of held to maturity securities was $26.0 million and $21.1 million, respectively.
The loan portfolio, which represents the Companys largest asset group, is a significant source of both interest and fee income. The portfolio consists of commercial, Small Business Administration (SBA), residential mortgage and consumer loans. Elements of the loan portfolio are subject to differing levels of credit and interest rate risk. Loans increased $31.0 million, or 11.4 percent to $303.6 million at September 30, 2002, from year-end 2001.
SBA loans provide guarantees of up to 85 percent of the principal from the SBA. SBA loans are generally sold in the secondary market with the non-guaranteed portion held in the portfolio. SBA loans amounted to $44.0 million at September 30, 2002, an increase of $8.2 million from year-end 2001. SBA loans held for sale, carried at the lower of aggregate cost or market, amounted to $14.1 million at September 30, 2002, a decrease of $3.6 million from year-end 2001. The SBA held for sale portfolio decreased due to the increased volume of loan sales in 2002, while the Company held SBA loans in portfolio for longer periods during 2001. SBA loans are often originated outside of the Companys market place. The yield on SBA loans which are generally floating and tied to prime was 6.49 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 compared to 9.22 percent for the same period a year ago.
Commercial loans are generally made in the Companys market place for the purpose of providing working capital, financing the purchase of equipment, inventory or commercial real estate and for other business purposes. These loans amounted to $154.3 million at September 30, 2002, an increase of $35.1 million, or 29.4 percent, from year-end 2001. The increase in the portfolio was a result of originations exceeding prepayments. Included in commercial loans as of September 30, 2002 are $2.3 million of financed commercial leases compared to $3.6 million at December 31, 2001. The yield on these commercial loans was 7.42 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 compared to 8.69 percent for the same period a year ago. The Company no longer engages in lease financing.
Residential mortgage loans consist of loans secured by residential properties. These loans amounted to $64.2 million at September 30, 2002, a decrease of $9.0 million from year-end 2001. The decrease in residential mortgages was a result of pay-downs in the portfolio partially offset by purchases totaling $10.4 million. The Company does not originate a material amount of mortgage loans held for investment. The yield on residential mortgages was 6.04 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 compared to 5.99 percent for the same period a year ago.
Consumer loans consist of home equity loans and loans for the purpose of financing the purchase of consumer goods, home improvements, and other personal needs, and are generally secured by the personal property being purchased. These
16
loans amounted to $27.0 million at September 30, 2002, an increase of $0.3 million from year-end December 2001. The increase in the consumer loan portfolio was primarily the result of an increase in home equity loans offset by pay-downs. The yield on consumer loans was 5.92 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared to 7.17 percent for the same period a year ago.
The declines in yield throughout the loan portfolio reflect the declining interest rate environment.
Asset Quality
Inherent in the lending function is the possibility a customer may not perform in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan. A borrowers inability to pay its obligations according to the contractual terms can create the risk of past due loans and ultimately credit losses, especially on collateral deficient loans.
Non-performing loans consist of loans that are not accruing interest (nonaccrual loans) as a result of principal or interest being in default for a period of 90 days or more or when the collectibility of principal and interest according to the contractual terms is in doubt. When a loan is classified as nonaccrual, interest accruals discontinue and all past due interest previously recognized as income is reversed and charged against current period income. Generally, until the loan becomes current, any payments received from the borrower are applied to outstanding principal until such time as management determines that the financial condition of the borrower and other factors merit recognition of a portion of such payments as interest income.
Loans past due 90 days and still accruing interest, are not included in non-performing loans. Management believes these loans to be well collateralized and in the process of collection. The Company had $775 thousand of loans 90 days past due and still accruing at September 30, 2002, compared to $69 thousand at December 31, 2001. These loans generally consist of loans where customers continue to make the monthly principal and interest payments, however, the loans have matured and are pending renewal.
Credit risk is minimized by loan diversification and adhering to credit administration policies and procedures. Due diligence on loans begins upon the origination of a loan with a borrower. Documentation, including a borrowers credit history, materials establishing the value and liquidity of potential collateral, the purpose of the loan, the source of funds for repayment of the loan, and other factors are analyzed before a loan is submitted for approval. The loan portfolio is then subject to ongoing internal reviews for credit quality.
The following table sets forth information concerning non-accrual loans and non-performing assets for the quarters ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, and December 31, 2001:
Non-performing loans
Sept. 30, 2002
December 31, 2001
Sept. 30, 2001
2,667
2,015
2,169
88
989
75
180
142
Total non-performing loans
2,999
3,184
2,586
OREO
258
163
Total Non-Performing Assets
3,205
3,442
2,748
Past Due 90 days or more and still accruing interest
21
724
2,303
56
37
Total accruing loans 90 days or more past due
775
2,360
Non-Performing assets to total assets
0.75
0.91
Non-Performing assets to loans and OREO
1.06
1.26
1.09
Allowance for loans losses as a Percentage of non-performing loans
126.24
99.40
111.06
Allowance for loan losses to total loans
1.25
1.16
1.14
Non-performing assets amounted to $3.2 million at September 30, 2002, a decrease of $238 thousand from $3.4 million at year-end 2001. Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest at September 30, 2002 amounted to $775 thousand compared to $69 thousand at December 31, 2001. Loans past due 90 days or more generally consist of loans
17
where customers continue to make the monthly payments, however, the loans have matured and are pending renewal. Included in non-performing assets at September 30, 2002 are $1.1 million of loans guaranteed by the SBA.
Potential problem loans are those where information about possible credit problems of borrowers causes management to have doubts as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with loan repayment terms. These loans are not included in non-performing loans as they continue to perform. Potential problem loans, which consist primarily of commercial loans, were $1.1 million at September 30, 2002 and $0.3 million at December 31, 2001.
The determination of the adequacy of allowance for loan losses is a critical accounting policy of the Company and is maintained at a level deemed sufficient by management to absorb estimated credit losses as of the balance sheet date. Management utilizes a standardized methodology to assess the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. This process consists of the identification of specific reserves for identified problem loans based on loan grades and the calculation of general reserves based on minimum reserve levels by loan type. Risks within the loan portfolio are analyzed on a continuous basis by management, and periodically by an independent credit review function and by the audit committee. A risk system, consisting of multiple grading categories, is utilized as an analytical tool to assess risk and to quantify the appropriate level of loss reserves. Along with the risk system, management further evaluates risk characteristics of the loan portfolio under current economic conditions and considers such factors as the financial condition of the borrowers, past and expected loss experience based upon current conditions in the portfolio, and other factors management feels deserve recognition in establishing an adequate reserve. This risk assessment process, which includes the determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, is performed at least quarterly, and, as adjustments become necessary, they are realized in the periods in which they become known.
Provisions charged to expense increase the allowance and the allowance is reduced by net charge-offs. Although management attempts to maintain the allowance at a level deemed adequate to provide for potential losses, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based upon certain factors including obtaining updated financial information about the borrowers financial condition and changes in market conditions. In addition, various regulatory agencies periodically review the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. These agencies have in the past and may in the future require the Bank to make additional adjustments based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.
The allowance for loan losses totaled $3.8 million, $3.2 million, and $2.9 million at September 30, 2002, December 31, 2001, and September 30, 2001, respectively with resulting allowance to total loan ratios of 1.25 percent, 1.16 percent and 1.14 percent respectively. Net charge offs amounted to $152 thousand and $1.3 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared to $68 thousand and $262 thousand for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2001. The increase in net charge offs for the three and nine months ended is primarily due to charge offs on commercial lease loans and a credit to an insurance finance company.
18
The following is a reconciliation summary of the allowance for loan losses the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001:
Allowance for Loan Loss Activity
Nine Months ended Sept. 30,
Balance, beginning of period
3,563
2,664
2,558
Provision charged to expense
Charge-offs:
188
210
48
80
112
93
Total Charge-offs
198
1,455
340
Recoveries:
35
70
Total recoveries
46
126
78
Total net charge-offs
152
1,329
262
Balance, end of period
Selected loan quality ratios:
Net charge offs to average loans
0.20
0.11
0.61
0.15
Allowance for loan losses to total loans at period end
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans
Deposits, which include non-interest and interest bearing demand deposits and interest-bearing savings and time deposits, are the primary source of the Companys funds. The Company offers a variety of products designed to attract and retain customers, with primary focus on building and expanding relationships. For the first nine months of the year the Company realized continued growth in deposits. This growth was achieved through emphasis on customer service, competitive rate structures and selective marketing. The Company attempts to establish a comprehensive relationship with business borrowers, seeking deposits as well as lending relationships.
Total deposits increased $34.1 million to $374.1 million at September 30, 2002 from $340.0 million at December 31, 2001. The increase in deposits was primarily the result of a $6.8 million increase in demand deposits and $50.7 million increase in interest bearing checking and savings, partially offset by a decline in time deposits totaling $23.4 million. The decline in time deposits is the result of promotional high rate deposits maturing in a lower interest rate environment and the disintermediation into the Companys higher yielding checking product Opportunity Checking. Included in deposits are $29.8 million of Government deposits, as compared to $33.2 million at December 31, 2001. These deposits are very sensitive to price competition. The Company has significantly reduced its reliance on these deposits as a source of funds, and believes the current portfolio of these deposits to be appropriate.
Other Debt
Other debt, which includes $10.0 million in advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB), and $2.8 million of lease obligations, amounted to $12.8 million at September 30, 2002, a decline of $66 thousand from year-end 2001. The 4.92% borrowings from the FHLB mature in 2010 and are callable at any time.
Trust Preferred Securities
On September 26, 2002, Unity (NJ) Statutory Trust I a statutory business trust and wholly-owned subsidiary of Unity Bancorp Inc., issued $9.0 million of floating rate capital trust pass through securities to investors due on September 26, 2032. The capital securities have preference over the common securities with respect to liquidation and other distributions and qualify as Tier I capital. The Subordinate Debentures are redeemable in whole or part, prior to maturity but after September 26, 2007. The floating interest rate on the Subordinate Debentures is three-month LIBOR plus 3.40% and re-prices quarterly. The initial rate at September 30, 2002 was 5.21%. The additional capital will be used to bolster the Companys capital ratios and for general corporate purposes, including among other things, capital contributions to Unity Bank and to fund stock repurchases.
19
Interest Rate Sensitivity
The principal objectives of the asset and liability management function are to establish prudent risk management guidelines, evaluate and control the level of interest rate risk in balance sheet accounts, determine the level of appropriate risk given the business focus, operating environment, capital, and liquidity requirements, and actively manage risk within the Board approved guidelines. The Company seeks to reduce the vulnerability of the operations to changes in interest rates, and actions in this regard are taken under the guidance of the Asset/Liability Management Committee (ALCO) of the Board of Directors. The ALCO reviews the maturities and repricing of loans, investments, deposits and borrowings, cash flow needs, current market conditions, and interest rate levels.
The Company utilizes Modified Duration of Equity and Economic Value of Portfolio Equity (EVPE) models to measure the impact of longer-term asset and liability mismatches beyond two years. The modified duration of equity measures the potential price risk of equity to changes in interest rates. A longer modified duration of equity indicates a greater degree of risk to rising interest rates. Because of balance sheet optionality, an EVPE analysis is also used to dynamically model the present value of asset and liability cash flows, with rate shocks of 200 basis points. The economic value of equity is likely to be different as interest rates change. Like the simulation model, results falling outside prescribed ranges require action by the ALCO. The Companys variance in the economic value of equity, as a percentage of assets with rate shocks of 200 basis points at September 30 2002, is a decline of 0.8 percent in a rising rate environment and an decrease of 0.8 percent in a falling rate environment. Both variances are within the board-approved guidelines of +/- 3.00 percent. At December 31, 2001 the economic value of equity with rate shocks of 200 basis points was a decline of 1.4 percent in a rising rate environment and an increase of 0.1 percent in a falling rate environment.
Operating, Investing, and Financing Cash
Cash and cash equivalents amounted to $34.7 million at September 30, 2002, an increase of $17.9 million from December 31, 2001. Net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, amounted to $8.0 million, primarily from proceeds from the sales of loans held for sale, net income from operations and the provision for loan losses partially offset by originations of loans held for sale. Net cash used in investing activities amounted to $32.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, primarily from the funding of and purchases in the loan portfolio, increased investment in securities, partially offset by maturities of securities. Net cash provided by financing activities, amounted to $42.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, attributable to deposit growth of $34.1 million, proceeds from the issuance of common stock of $1.5 million and the issuance of $9.0 million of Trust Preferred Securities, partially offset by the purchase and retirement of $2.5 million in common stock.
The Companys liquidity is a measure of its ability to fund loans, withdrawals or maturities of deposits and other cash outflows in a cost-effective manner.
Holding Company
At September 30, 2002, the Holding Company had $7.2 million in cash and $89 thousand in marketable securities compared to $1.3 million and $123 thousand respectively at December 31, 2001. The increase in cash at the parent company was due to the issuance of the Trust preferred securities and the exercise of common stock warrants offset by the purchase of the Companys common stock. Expenses at the Holding Company are minimal and the management believes that the Holding Company has adequate liquidity to fund its obligations.
Consolidated Bank
Liquidity is a measure of the ability to fund loans, withdrawals or maturities of deposits and other cash outflows in a cost-effective manner. The principal sources of funds are deposits, scheduled amortization and repayments of loan principal, sales and maturities of investment securities and funds provided by operations. While scheduled loan payments and maturing investments are relatively predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and loan prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.
At September 30, 2002, $8.1 million was available for additional borrowings from the FHLB of New York. Pledging additional collateral in the form of 1-4 family residential mortgages or investment securities can increase the line with the FHLB. The maximum borrowing line available if additional collateral was pledged as of September 30, 2002 amounted to $42.3 million. An additional source of liquidity is Federal Funds sold, which were $20.0 million at September 30, 2002.
As of September 30, 2002, deposits included $29.7 million of Government deposits, as compared to $33.2 million at December 31, 2001. These deposits are generally short in duration, and are sensitive to price competition. The Company believes the current portfolio of these deposits to be appropriate. Included in the portfolio are $27.0 million of deposits from three municipalities. The withdrawal of these deposits, in whole or in part would not create a liquidity shortfall for the Company.
At September 30, 2002, the Bank had approximately $86.1 million of loan commitments, which will generally either expire or be funded within one year. The Company believes it has the necessary liquidity to honor all commitments. Many
20
of these commitments will expire and never be funded. In addition, approximately $35.0 million of these commitments are for SBA loans, which may be sold into the secondary market.
A significant measure of the strength of a financial institution is its capital base. Federal regulators have classified and defined capital into the following components: (1) tier 1 capital, which includes tangible shareholders equity for common stock and qualifying preferred stock, and (2) tier 2 capital, which includes a portion of the allowance for loan losses, certain qualifying long-term debt and preferred stock which does not qualify for tier 1 capital. Minimum capital levels are regulated by risk-based capital adequacy guidelines, which require a bank to maintain certain capital as a percent of assets, and certain off-balance sheet items adjusted for predefined credit risk factors (risk-adjusted assets). A bank is required to maintain, at a minimum, tier 1 capital as a percentage of risk-adjusted assets of 4.0 percent and combined tier 1 and tier 2 capital as a percentage of risk-adjusted assets of 8.0 percent.
In addition to the risk-based guidelines, regulators require that a bank which meets the regulators highest performance and operation standards maintain a minimum leverage ratio (tier 1 capital as a percentage of tangible assets) of 4 percent. For those banks with higher levels of risk or that are experiencing or anticipating significant growth, the minimum leverage ratio will be proportionately increased. Minimum leverage ratios for each bank are evaluated through the ongoing regulatory examination process. The increase in the Companys capital ratios is related to the issuance of $9.0 million of Trust preferred securities which qualify as Regulatory Capital.
The Companys capital amounts and ratios are presented in the following table.
Actual
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
Amount
Ratio
As of September 30, 2002
Leverage Ratio
35,020
8.45
³
16,721
4.00
20,901
5.00
Tier I risk-based ratio
11.48
12,238
18,357
6.00
Total risk-based ratio
39,051
12.80
24,476
8.00
30,595
10.00
As of December 31, 2001
24,786
6.63
14,977
18,721
9.53
10,405
15,607
27,951
10.75
20,810
26,012
The Banks capital amounts and ratios are presented in the following table.
27,876
6.67
16,577
20,722
9.11
12,205
18,308
31,662
10.35
24,410
30,513
23,384
6.25
14,970
18,713
9.00
10,394
15,591
26,549
10.22
20,788
25,986
Shareholders Equity
Shareholders equity increased $1.8 million, or 7.4 percent, to $26.7 million at September 30, 2002 compared to $24.8 million at December 31, 2001. This increase was the result of the $2.7 million in net income and $1.5 million from the exercise of common stock warrants and employee stock plans, and $246 thousand increase in accumulated other comprehensive income, partially offset by the purchase and retirement of the Companys common stock of $2.5 million. As of September 30, 2002 the Company had 425 thousand common stock warrants exercisable at $5.50 per share, which expire in October 2002. As of October 16, 2002 all common stock warrants were exercised. On July 12, 2002 the Company increased the number of authorized common stock from 7,500,000 at December 31, 2001 to 12,500,000 at September 30, 2002.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
The financial statements and notes thereto, presented elsewhere herein, have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering the change in the relative purchasing power of money over time and due to inflation. The impact of inflation is reflected in the increased cost of the operations. Unlike most industrial companies, nearly all the Companys assets and liabilities are monetary. As a result, interest rates have a greater impact on performance than do the effects of general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the prices of goods and services.
During 2002, there have been no significant changes in the Companys assessment of market risk as reported in Item 6 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K. (See the interest rate sensitivity in Managements discussion and analysis.)
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and proceedings. The Companys chief executive officer and its chief financial officer, after evaluation of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-14(c) and 15-d-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the date (the Evaluation Date) within 90 days before the filing of this quarterly report, have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and designed to ensure that material information relating to the Companys and its consolidated subsidiaries would be made known to them by others within those entities.
(b) Changes in internal controls. There were not any significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company may, in the ordinary course of business become a party to litigation involving collection matters, contract claims and other legal proceedings relating to the conduct of its business. The company does not believe that any existing legal claims or proceedings will have a material impact on the Companys financial position, or on the Companys results of operations.
Item 2. Changes in Securities None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities-None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders - None
Item 5. Other Information - None
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8K
(a) Exhibits
Included with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as exhibit 99 is the certification required pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
During the three month period ended September 30, 2002, the Registrant filed one Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 21,2002, under Item. Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure incorporating the press release announcing that discussions regarding the registrants potential acquisition of Fist Bank of Central Jersey had been terminated.
(c) Reports on Form 8-K
During the three month period ended September 30, 2002, the Registrant filed one Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 12, 2002 under Item 5. Other Events. The Registrant completed a merger, the sole result of which is the re-domicile of the Registrant from Delaware to New Jersey. In addition, the Registrants Certificate of Incorporation reflects an increase in the total number of shares authorized, as approved by the Registrants shareholders, to 12,500,000.
22
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
UNITY BANCORP, INC.
Dated: November 14, 2002
By:
/s/ JAMES A. HUGHES
JAMES A. HUGHES,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Certifications
I, Anthony Feraro, certify that:
l. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Unity Bancorp, Inc.;
2 Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: November 14, 2002
Name: /S/ Anthony Feraro
Title: Chief Executive Officer and President
I, James A. Hughes, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Unity Bancorp, Inc;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Name: /S/ James A. Hughes
Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT INDEX
quarterly REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
EXHIBIT NO.
DESCRIPITION
99
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
26