Companies:
10,793
total market cap:
S$177.391 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ SGD
$
USD
๐บ๐ธ
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
Fulton Financial
FULT
#3458
Rank
S$5.28 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
S$27.48
Share price
-1.28%
Change (1 day)
34.18%
Change (1 year)
๐ฆ Banks
๐ณ Financial services
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Stock Splits
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Annual Reports (10-K)
Fulton Financial
Quarterly Reports (10-Q)
Financial Year FY2014 Q3
Fulton Financial - 10-Q quarterly report FY2014 Q3
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20459
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
ý
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2014
, or
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from
to
Commission File No.
0-10587
FULTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
PENNSYLVANIA
23-2195389
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
One Penn Square, P.O. Box 4887, Lancaster, Pennsylvania
17604
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(717) 291-2411
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
ý
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
ý
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
ý
Accelerated filer
¨
Non-accelerated filer
¨
Smaller reporting company
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
¨
No
ý
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
Common Stock, $2.50 Par Value –185,265,000 shares outstanding as of October 31, 2014.
1
FULTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE AND
NINE
MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2014
INDEX
Description
Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited):
(a)
Consolidated Balance Sheets - September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013
3
(b)
Consolidated Statements of Income - Three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013
4
(c)
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income - Three and nine months ended
September 30, 2014 and 2013
5
(d)
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity - Nine months ended
September 30, 2014 and 2013
6
(e)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Nine months ended
September 30, 2014 and 2013
7
(f)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
8
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
39
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
66
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
70
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
71
Item 1A. Risk Factors
71
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
72
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
72
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
72
Item 5. Other Information
72
Item 6. Exhibits
72
Signatures
73
Exhibit Index
74
2
Item 1. Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except per-share data)
September 30,
2014
December 31,
2013
(unaudited)
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks
$
220,946
$
218,540
Interest-bearing deposits with other banks
291,523
163,988
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock
86,056
84,173
Loans held for sale
25,212
21,351
Available for sale investment securities
2,470,609
2,568,434
Loans, net of unearned income
13,030,405
12,782,220
Less: Allowance for loan losses
(189,477
)
(202,780
)
Net Loans
12,840,928
12,579,440
Premises and equipment
224,441
226,021
Accrued interest receivable
43,544
44,037
Goodwill and intangible assets
532,117
533,076
Other assets
502,798
495,574
Total Assets
$
17,238,174
$
16,934,634
LIABILITIES
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing
$
3,556,810
$
3,283,172
Interest-bearing
9,776,817
9,208,014
Total Deposits
13,333,627
12,491,186
Short-term borrowings:
Federal funds purchased
6,606
582,436
Other short-term borrowings
558,346
676,193
Total Short-Term Borrowings
564,952
1,258,629
Accrued interest payable
17,425
15,218
Other liabilities
225,875
222,830
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and long-term debt
1,018,289
883,584
Total Liabilities
15,160,168
14,871,447
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock, $2.50 par value, 600 million shares authorized, 218.1 million shares issued in 2014 and 217.8 million shares issued in 2013
545,207
544,568
Additional paid-in capital
1,438,343
1,432,974
Retained earnings
538,749
463,843
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(11,948
)
(37,341
)
Treasury stock, at cost, 32.9 million shares in 2014 and 25.2 million shares in 2013
(432,345
)
(340,857
)
Total Shareholders’ Equity
2,078,006
2,063,187
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
$
17,238,174
$
16,934,634
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
3
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except per-share data)
Three months ended September 30
Nine months ended September 30
2014
2013
2014
2013
INTEREST INCOME
Loans, including fees
$
133,741
$
136,150
$
397,011
$
405,312
Investment securities:
Taxable
12,278
12,977
37,962
40,890
Tax-exempt
2,219
2,327
6,865
7,151
Dividends
339
337
996
1,091
Loans held for sale
237
382
585
1,261
Other interest income
976
659
3,065
1,527
Total Interest Income
149,790
152,832
446,484
457,232
INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits
8,998
8,743
25,579
28,642
Short-term borrowings
297
691
1,470
1,900
Long-term debt
11,129
10,865
32,606
32,448
Total Interest Expense
20,424
20,299
59,655
62,990
Net Interest Income
129,366
132,533
386,829
394,242
Provision for credit losses
3,500
9,500
9,500
38,000
Net Interest Income After Provision for Credit Losses
125,866
123,033
377,329
356,242
NON-INTEREST INCOME
Service charges on deposit accounts
12,801
13,938
37,064
42,700
Investment management and trust services
11,120
10,420
33,417
31,117
Other service charges and fees
9,954
9,518
29,407
27,536
Mortgage banking income
4,038
7,123
13,384
26,293
Other
3,906
3,725
10,813
11,315
Investment securities gains, net:
Other-than-temporary impairment losses
(84
)
(125
)
(122
)
(146
)
Less: Portion of gain recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) (before taxes)
66
28
92
22
Net other-than-temporary impairment losses
(18
)
(97
)
(30
)
(124
)
Net gains on sales of investment securities
99
2,730
1,223
8,095
Investment securities gains, net
81
2,633
1,193
7,971
Total Non-Interest Income
41,900
47,357
125,278
146,932
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE
Salaries and employee benefits
62,434
63,344
185,623
188,046
Net occupancy expense
11,582
11,519
36,649
34,810
Other outside services
8,632
5,048
19,684
13,223
Data processing
4,689
4,757
12,816
13,169
Software
3,353
3,268
9,487
9,110
Equipment expense
3,307
3,646
10,269
11,447
Professional fees
3,252
3,329
9,715
9,771
FDIC insurance expense
2,882
2,918
8,186
8,766
Marketing
1,798
2,251
5,719
6,045
Other real estate owned and repossession expense
1,303
1,453
3,034
6,248
Operating risk loss
1,242
3,297
3,786
6,923
Intangible amortization
314
534
944
1,603
Other
11,010
11,241
35,614
35,510
Total Non-Interest Expense
115,798
116,605
341,526
344,671
Income Before Income Taxes
51,968
53,785
161,081
158,503
Income taxes
13,402
13,837
41,136
38,746
Net Income
$
38,566
$
39,948
$
119,945
$
119,757
PER SHARE:
Net Income (Basic)
$
0.21
$
0.21
$
0.64
$
0.62
Net Income (Diluted)
0.21
0.21
0.64
0.61
Cash Dividends
0.08
0.08
0.24
0.24
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
4
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)
Three months ended September 30
Nine months ended September 30,
2014
2013
2014
2013
Net Income
$
38,566
$
39,948
$
119,945
$
119,757
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net of tax:
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities
(3,011
)
(6,951
)
23,912
(43,784
)
Reclassification adjustment for postretirement amendment gains included in net income
—
—
(944
)
—
Reclassification adjustment for securities gains included in net income
(52
)
(1,711
)
(775
)
(5,181
)
Non-credit related unrealized gain on other-than-temporarily impaired debt securities
138
(106
)
650
1,332
Unrealized gain on derivative financial instruments
34
34
102
102
Unrecognized pension and postretirement income
—
—
2,144
—
Amortization of net unrecognized pension and postretirement items
104
329
304
985
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(2,787
)
(8,405
)
25,393
(46,546
)
Total Comprehensive Income
$
35,779
$
31,543
$
145,338
$
73,211
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
NINE
MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2014
AND
2013
(in thousands, except per-share data)
Common Stock
Retained
Earnings
Treasury
Stock
Total
Shares
Outstanding
Amount
Additional Paid-in
Capital
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Balance at December 31, 2013
192,652
$
544,568
$
1,432,974
$
463,843
$
(37,341
)
$
(340,857
)
$
2,063,187
Net income
119,945
119,945
Other comprehensive income (loss)
25,393
25,393
Stock issued, including related tax benefits
506
639
1,059
3,767
5,465
Stock-based compensation awards
4,310
4,310
Acquisition of treasury stock
(8,000
)
(95,255
)
(95,255
)
Common stock cash dividends - $0.24 per share
(45,039
)
(45,039
)
Balance at September 30, 2014
185,158
$
545,207
$
1,438,343
$
538,749
$
(11,948
)
$
(432,345
)
$
2,078,006
Balance at December 31, 2012
199,225
$
542,093
$
1,426,267
$
363,937
$
5,675
$
(256,316
)
$
2,081,656
Net income
119,757
119,757
Other comprehensive income (loss)
(46,546
)
(46,546
)
Stock issued, including related tax benefits
1,107
1,959
562
4,838
7,359
Stock-based compensation awards
4,186
4,186
Acquisition of treasury stock
(8,000
)
(90,927
)
(90,927
)
Common stock cash dividends - $0.24 per share
(46,521
)
(46,521
)
Balance at September 30, 2013
192,332
$
544,052
$
1,431,015
$
437,173
$
(40,871
)
$
(342,405
)
$
2,028,964
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
6
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)
Nine months ended September 30
2014
2013
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Income
$
119,945
$
119,757
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for credit losses
9,500
38,000
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment
18,412
19,165
Net amortization of investment securities premiums
4,399
8,749
Investment securities gains, net
(1,193
)
(7,971
)
Net (increase) decrease in loans held for sale
(3,861
)
28,626
Amortization of intangible assets
944
1,603
Stock-based compensation
4,310
4,186
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
(54
)
(237
)
Decrease in accrued interest receivable
493
1,071
(Increase) decrease in other assets
(1,909
)
37,129
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable
2,207
(2,673
)
Decrease in other liabilities
(5,315
)
(24,207
)
Total adjustments
27,933
103,441
Net cash provided by operating activities
147,878
223,198
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale
15,219
268,259
Proceeds from maturities of securities held to maturity
—
86
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale
273,688
526,393
Purchase of securities available for sale
(164,676
)
(691,362
)
Increase in short-term investments
(129,418
)
(63,965
)
Net increase in loans
(271,494
)
(684,529
)
Net purchases of premises and equipment
(16,832
)
(18,741
)
Net cash used in investing activities
(293,513
)
(663,859
)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net increase in demand and savings deposits
768,979
595,722
Net increase (decrease) in time deposits
73,462
(358,764
)
(Decrease) increase in short-term borrowings
(693,677
)
330,178
Additions to long-term debt
140,000
—
Repayments of long-term debt
(5,295
)
(5,131
)
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
5,411
7,122
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
54
237
Dividends paid
(45,638
)
(31,138
)
Acquisition of treasury stock
(95,255
)
(90,927
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
148,041
447,299
Net Increase in Cash and Due From Banks
2,406
6,638
Cash and Due From Banks at Beginning of Period
218,540
256,300
Cash and Due From Banks at End of Period
$
220,946
$
262,938
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest
$
57,448
$
65,663
Income taxes
16,632
29,964
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
7
FULTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTE A – Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Fulton Financial Corporation (the Corporation) have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements as well as revenues and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the
three
and
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending
December 31, 2014
. The Corporation evaluates subsequent events through the filing date of this Form 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Recent Accounting Standards
In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Update 2014-08, "Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity." ASC Update 2014-08 changes the criteria for reporting discontinued operations, including a change in the definition of what constitutes the disposal of a component and additional disclosure requirements. For public business entities ASC Update 2014-08 is effective for disposals that occur within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014. For the Corporation, this standards update is effective with its March 31, 2015 quarterly report on Form 10-Q. The adoption of ASC Update 2014-08 is not expected to have a material impact on the Corporation's consolidated financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASC Update 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers." This standards update provides a framework that replaces most existing revenue recognition guidance. The core principle prescribed by this standards update is that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASC Update 2014-09 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early application is not permitted. For the Corporation, this standards update is effective with its March 31, 2017 quarterly report on Form 10-Q. The Corporation is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASC Update 2014-09 on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASC Update 2014-11, "Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures." In addition to new disclosure requirements, ASC Update 2014-11 requires that all repurchase-to-maturity transactions be accounted for as secured borrowings rather than as sales of financial assets. Also, all transfers of financial assets executed contemporaneously with a repurchase agreement with the same counterparty must be accounted for separately, the result of which would be the treatment of such transactions as secured borrowings. ASC Update 2014-11 is effective for public business entities’ interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014. For the Corporation, this standards update is effective with its March 31, 2015 quarterly report on Form 10-Q. The adoption of ASC Update 2014-11 is not expected to have a material impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASC Update 2014-12, "Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period." ASC Update 2014-12 clarifies guidance related to accounting for share-based payment awards with terms that allow an employee to vest in the award regardless of whether the employee is rendering service on the date a performance target is achieved. ASC Update 2014-12 requires that a performance target that affects vesting, and that could be achieved after the requisite service period, be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. ASC Update 2014-12 is effective for public business entities’ interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, with earlier adoption permitted. For the Corporation, this standards update is effective with its March 31, 2015 quarterly report on Form 10-Q. The adoption of ASC Update 2014-12 is not expected to have a material impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASC Update 2014-14, "Receivables - Troubled Debt Restructuring by Creditors." ASC Update 2014-14 clarifies troubled debt restructuring guidance related to the classification and measurement of certain government-sponsored loan guarantee programs upon foreclosure. ASC Update 2014-14 is effective for public business entities’ interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, with earlier adoption permitted. For the Corporation, this standards
8
update is effective with its March 31, 2015 quarterly report on Form 10-Q. The adoption of ASC Update 2014-14 is not expected to have a material impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASC Update 2014-15, "Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern." ASC Update 2014-15 provides guidance regarding management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related disclosures. The standards update describes how an entity's management should assess whether there are conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. ASC Update 2014-15 is effective for public business entities’ annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2016, with earlier adoption permitted. For the Corporation, this standards update is effective with its December 31, 2016 annual report on Form 10-K. The adoption of ASC Update 2014-15 is not expected to have a material impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in the
2013
consolidated financial statements and notes have been reclassified to conform to the
2014
presentation.
NOTE B – Net Income Per Share
Basic net income per share is calculated as net income divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding.
Diluted net income per share is calculated as net income divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding plus the incremental number of shares added as a result of converting common stock equivalents, calculated using the treasury stock method. The Corporation’s common stock equivalents consist of outstanding stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance-based restricted stock units (PSUs). PSUs are required to be included in weighted average shares outstanding if performance measures, as defined in each PSU award agreement, are met as of the end of the period.
A reconciliation of weighted average shares outstanding used to calculate basic net income per share and diluted net income per share follows:
Three months ended September 30
Nine months ended September 30
2014
2013
2014
2013
(in thousands)
Weighted average shares outstanding (basic)
186,109
192,251
187,893
193,926
Impact of common stock equivalents
846
1,008
970
1,000
Weighted average shares outstanding (diluted)
186,955
193,259
188,863
194,926
For the
three
and
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
,
2.5 million
and
2.9 million
shares issuable under stock options, respectively, were excluded from the diluted net income per share computation as their effect would have been anti-dilutive. For the
three
and
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
,
3.2 million
and
3.7 million
shares issuable under stock options, respectively, were excluded from the diluted net income per share computation as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
9
NOTE C – Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The following table presents changes in other comprehensive income (loss):
Before-Tax Amount
Tax Effect
Net of Tax Amount
(in thousands)
Three months ended September 30, 2014
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities
$
(4,629
)
$
1,618
$
(3,011
)
Reclassification adjustment for securities gains included in net income (1)
(81
)
29
(52
)
Non-credit related unrealized gains (losses) on other-than-temporarily impaired debt securities
212
(74
)
138
Unrealized gain on derivative financial instruments
52
(18
)
34
Amortization of net unrecognized pension and postretirement items (2)
160
(56
)
104
Total Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
$
(4,286
)
$
1,499
$
(2,787
)
Three months ended September 30, 2013
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities
$
(10,691
)
$
3,740
$
(6,951
)
Reclassification adjustment for securities gains included in net income (1)
(2,633
)
922
(1,711
)
Non-credit related unrealized gains (losses) on other-than-temporarily impaired debt securities
(163
)
57
(106
)
Unrealized gain on derivative financial instruments
52
(18
)
34
Amortization of net unrecognized pension and postretirement items (2)
505
(176
)
329
Total Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
$
(12,930
)
$
4,525
$
(8,405
)
Nine months ended September 30, 2014
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities
$
36,790
$
(12,878
)
$
23,912
Reclassification adjustment for postretirement gains included in net income (2)
(1,452
)
508
(944
)
Reclassification adjustment for securities gains included in net income (1)
(1,193
)
418
(775
)
Non-credit related unrealized gains (losses) on other-than-temporarily impaired debt securities
1,000
(350
)
650
Unrealized gain on derivative financial instruments
157
(55
)
102
Unrecognized pension and postretirement income
3,291
(1,147
)
2,144
Amortization of net unrecognized pension and postretirement items (2)
469
(165
)
304
Total Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
$
39,062
$
(13,669
)
$
25,393
Nine months ended September 30, 2013
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities
$
(67,357
)
$
23,573
$
(43,784
)
Reclassification adjustment for securities gains included in net income (1)
(7,971
)
2,790
(5,181
)
Non-credit related unrealized gains (losses) on other-than-temporarily impaired debt securities
2,049
(717
)
1,332
Unrealized gain on derivative financial instruments
157
(55
)
102
Amortization of net unrecognized pension and postretirement items (2)
1,515
(530
)
985
Total Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
$
(71,607
)
$
25,061
$
(46,546
)
(1)
Amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. Before-tax amounts included within "Investment securities gains, net" on the consolidated statements of income. See Note D, "Investment Securities," for additional details.
(2)
Amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. Before-tax amounts included within "Salaries and employee benefits" on the consolidated statements of income. See Note H, "Employee Benefit Plans," for additional details.
10
The following table presents changes in each component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Investment Securities Not Other-Than-Temporarily Impaired
Unrealized Non-Credit Gains (Losses) on Other-Than-Temporarily Impaired Debt Securities
Unrealized Effective Portions of Losses on Forward-Starting Interest Rate Swaps
Unrecognized Pension and Postretirement Plan Income (Costs)
Total
(in thousands)
Three months ended September 30, 2014
Balance at June 30, 2014
$
(580
)
$
1,434
$
(2,614
)
$
(7,401
)
$
(9,161
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
(3,011
)
138
—
—
(2,873
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(63
)
11
34
104
86
Balance at September 30, 2014
$
(3,654
)
$
1,583
$
(2,580
)
$
(7,297
)
$
(11,948
)
Three months ended September 30, 2013
Balance at June 30, 2013
$
(12,941
)
$
1,050
$
(2,750
)
$
(17,825
)
$
(32,466
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
(6,951
)
(106
)
—
—
(7,057
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(1,774
)
63
34
329
(1,348
)
Balance at September 30, 2013
$
(21,666
)
$
1,007
$
(2,716
)
$
(17,496
)
$
(40,871
)
Nine months ended September 30, 2014
Balance at December 31, 2013
$
(27,510
)
$
1,652
$
(2,682
)
$
(8,801
)
$
(37,341
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
23,912
650
—
2,144
26,706
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(56
)
(719
)
102
(640
)
(1,313
)
Balance at September 30, 2014
$
(3,654
)
$
1,583
$
(2,580
)
$
(7,297
)
$
(11,948
)
Nine months ended September 30, 2013
Balance at December 31, 2012
$
26,361
$
613
$
(2,818
)
$
(18,481
)
$
5,675
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
(43,784
)
1,332
—
—
(42,452
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(4,243
)
(938
)
102
985
(4,094
)
Balance at September 30, 2013
$
(21,666
)
$
1,007
$
(2,716
)
$
(17,496
)
$
(40,871
)
11
NOTE D – Investment Securities
The following table presents the amortized cost and estimated fair values of investment securities, which were all classified as available for sale:
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair
Value
(in thousands)
September 30, 2014
Equity securities
$
34,380
$
10,927
$
(29
)
$
45,278
U.S. Government securities
200
—
—
200
U.S. Government sponsored agency securities
235
5
—
240
State and municipal securities
250,195
7,917
(496
)
257,616
Corporate debt securities
99,670
5,777
(4,020
)
101,427
Collateralized mortgage obligations
975,971
6,700
(27,631
)
955,040
Mortgage-backed securities
954,412
14,201
(6,278
)
962,335
Auction rate securities
158,725
1
(10,253
)
148,473
$
2,473,788
$
45,528
$
(48,707
)
$
2,470,609
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair
Value
(in thousands)
December 31, 2013
Equity securities
$
33,922
$
12,355
$
(76
)
$
46,201
U.S. Government securities
525
—
—
525
U.S. Government sponsored agency securities
720
7
(1
)
726
State and municipal securities
281,810
6,483
(3,444
)
284,849
Corporate debt securities
100,468
5,685
(7,404
)
98,749
Collateralized mortgage obligations
1,069,138
8,036
(44,776
)
1,032,398
Mortgage-backed securities
949,328
13,881
(17,497
)
945,712
Auction rate securities
172,299
234
(13,259
)
159,274
$
2,608,210
$
46,681
$
(86,457
)
$
2,568,434
Securities carried at
$1.8 billion
as of
September 30, 2014
and
$1.7 billion
as of
December 31, 2013
were pledged as collateral to secure public and trust deposits and customer repurchase agreements.
Equity securities include common stocks of financial institutions (estimated fair value of
$39.3 million
at
September 30, 2014
and
$40.6 million
at
December 31, 2013
) and other equity investments (estimated fair value of
$6.0 million
at
September 30, 2014
and
$5.6 million
at
December 31, 2013
).
As of
September 30, 2014
, the financial institutions stock portfolio had a cost basis of
$28.6 million
and an estimated fair value of
$39.3 million
, including an investment in a single financial institution with a cost basis of
$20.0 million
and an estimated fair value of
$27.5 million
. The estimated fair value of this investment accounted for
70.0%
of the fair value of the Corporation's investments in the common stocks of publicly traded financial institutions. No other investment within the financial institutions stock portfolio exceeded
5%
of the portfolio's estimated fair value.
12
The amortized cost and estimated fair values of debt securities as of
September 30, 2014
, by contractual maturity, are shown in the following table. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
Amortized
Cost
Estimated
Fair Value
(in thousands)
Due in one year or less
$
13,218
$
13,284
Due from one year to five years
75,307
78,967
Due from five years to ten years
187,966
193,537
Due after ten years
232,534
222,168
509,025
507,956
Collateralized mortgage obligations
975,971
955,040
Mortgage-backed securities
954,412
962,335
$
2,439,408
$
2,425,331
The following table presents information related to the gross realized gains and losses on the sales of equity and debt securities:
Gross
Realized
Gains
Gross
Realized
Losses
Other-than-
temporary
Impairment
Losses
Net Gains (Losses)
Three months ended September 30, 2014
(in thousands)
Equity securities
$
99
$
—
$
—
$
99
Debt securities
—
—
(18
)
(18
)
Total
$
99
$
—
$
(18
)
$
81
Three months ended September 30, 2013
Equity securities
$
2,135
$
—
$
—
$
2,135
Debt securities
617
(22
)
(97
)
498
Total
$
2,752
$
(22
)
$
(97
)
$
2,633
Nine months ended September 30, 2014
Equity securities
$
100
$
—
$
(12
)
$
88
Debt securities
1,446
(323
)
(18
)
1,105
Total
$
1,546
$
(323
)
$
(30
)
$
1,193
Nine months ended September 30, 2013
Equity securities
$
4,357
$
(28
)
$
(27
)
$
4,302
Debt securities
3,788
(22
)
(97
)
3,669
Total
$
8,145
$
(50
)
$
(124
)
$
7,971
The other-than-temporary impairment charges for equity securities during the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
were for investments in common stocks of financial institutions and were due to the severity and duration of the declines in the fair values of certain financial institution stocks, in conjunction with management's assessment of the near-term prospects of each specific financial institution.
The credit related other-than-temporary impairment charges for debt securities during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
were for investments in pooled trust preferred securities issued by financial institutions. The credit related other-than-temporary impairment charges for the pooled trust preferred securities were determined based on an expected cash flows model.
13
The following table presents a summary of the cumulative credit related other-than-temporary impairment charges, recognized as components of earnings, for debt securities held by the Corporation at
September 30, 2014
and
2013
:
Three months ended September 30
Nine months ended September 30
2014
2013
2014
2013
(in thousands)
Balance of cumulative credit losses on debt securities, beginning of period
$
(17,214
)
$
(20,607
)
$
(20,691
)
$
(23,079
)
Additions for credit losses recorded which were not previously recognized as components of earnings
(18
)
(97
)
(18
)
(97
)
Reductions for securities sold during the period
—
—
3,472
2,468
Reductions for increases in cash flows expected to be collected that are recognized over the remaining life of the security
—
—
5
4
Balance of cumulative credit losses on debt securities, end of period
$
(17,232
)
$
(20,704
)
$
(17,232
)
$
(20,704
)
The following table presents the gross unrealized losses and estimated fair values of investments, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at
September 30, 2014
:
Less than 12 months
12 months or longer
Total
Estimated
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
(in thousands)
State and municipal securities
$
7,996
$
(37
)
$
26,484
$
(459
)
$
34,480
$
(496
)
Corporate debt securities
—
—
38,900
(4,020
)
38,900
(4,020
)
Collateralized mortgage obligations
53,189
(248
)
652,396
(27,383
)
705,585
(27,631
)
Mortgage-backed securities
241,707
(527
)
291,712
(5,751
)
533,419
(6,278
)
Auction rate securities
—
—
148,380
(10,253
)
148,380
(10,253
)
Total debt securities
302,892
(812
)
1,157,872
(47,866
)
1,460,764
(48,678
)
Equity securities
269
(17
)
77
(12
)
346
(29
)
$
303,161
$
(829
)
$
1,157,949
$
(47,878
)
$
1,461,110
$
(48,707
)
The Corporation’s collateralized mortgage obligations and mortgage-backed securities have contractual terms that generally do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost of the investment. Because the decline in market value of these securities is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, and because the Corporation does not have the intent to sell and does not believe it will more likely than not be required to sell any of these securities prior to a recovery of their fair value to amortized cost, the Corporation does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of
September 30, 2014
.
The unrealized holding losses on auction rate securities, or auction rate certificates (ARCs), are attributable to liquidity issues resulting from the failure of periodic auctions. The Corporation had previously purchased ARCs for investment management and trust customers as short-term investments with fair values that could be derived based on periodic auctions under normal market conditions. During 2008 and 2009, the Corporation purchased ARCs from these customers due to the failure of these periodic auctions, which made these previously short-term investments illiquid.
As of
September 30, 2014
, approximately
$144 million
, or
97%
, of the ARCs were rated above investment grade, with approximately
$6 million
, or
4%
, AAA rated and
$104 million
, or
72%
, AA rated. Approximately
$4 million
, or
3%
, of ARCs were either not rated or rated below investment grade by at least one ratings agency. Of this amount, approximately
$3 million
of the student loans underlying these ARCs have principal payments which are guaranteed by the federal government. In total, approximately
$147 million
, or
99%
, of the student loans underlying the ARCs have principal payments that are guaranteed by the federal government.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Corporation sold ARCs with a total book value of
$11.9 million
, with no gain or loss upon sale. As of
September 30, 2014
, all ARCs were current and making scheduled interest payments. Based on management’s evaluations, ARCs with a fair value of
$148.5 million
were not subject to any other-than-temporary impairment charges as of
September 30, 2014
. The Corporation does not have the intent to sell and does not believe it will more likely than not be required to sell any of these securities prior to a recovery of their fair value to amortized cost, which may be at maturity.
14
For its investments in equity securities, particularly its investments in stocks of financial institutions, management evaluates the near-term prospects of the issuers in relation to the severity and duration of the impairment. Based on that evaluation and the Corporation’s ability and intent to hold those investments for a reasonable period of time sufficient for a recovery of fair value, the Corporation does not consider those investments with unrealized holding losses as of
September 30, 2014
to be other-than-temporarily impaired.
The majority of the Corporation's available for sale corporate debt securities are issued by financial institutions. The following table presents the amortized cost and estimated fair value of corporate debt securities:
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
Amortized
cost
Estimated
fair value
Amortized
cost
Estimated
fair value
(in thousands)
Single-issuer trust preferred securities
$
47,546
$
44,075
$
47,481
$
40,531
Subordinated debt
47,498
50,289
47,405
50,327
Pooled trust preferred securities
2,050
4,487
2,997
5,306
Corporate debt securities issued by financial institutions
97,094
98,851
97,883
96,164
Other corporate debt securities
2,576
2,576
2,585
2,585
Available for sale corporate debt securities
$
99,670
$
101,427
$
100,468
$
98,749
The Corporation’s investments in single-issuer trust preferred securities had an unrealized loss of
$3.5 million
at
September 30, 2014
.
The Corporation did not record any other-than-temporary impairment charges for single-issuer trust preferred securities during the three or
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
or
2013
.
Six
of the Corporation's
20
single-issuer trust preferred securities were rated below investment grade by at least one ratings agency, with an amortized cost of
$13.5 million
and an estimated fair value of
$12.3 million
at
September 30, 2014
. All of the single-issuer trust preferred securities rated below investment grade were rated BB or Ba.
Three
single-issuer trust preferred securities with an amortized cost of
$4.7 million
and an estimated fair value of
$3.9 million
at
September 30, 2014
were not rated by any ratings agency.
During the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
, the Corporation sold
two
pooled trust preferred securities with a total amortized cost of
$728,000
, for a gain of
$1.1 million
. As of
September 30, 2014
, all
six
of the Corporation's pooled trust preferred securities, with an amortized cost of
$2.1 million
and an estimated fair value of
$4.5 million
, were rated below investment grade by at least one ratings agency, with ratings ranging from C to Ca. The class of securities held by the Corporation was below the most senior tranche, with the Corporation’s interests being subordinate to other investors in the pool. The Corporation determines the fair value of pooled trust preferred securities based on quotes provided by third-party brokers.
The amortized cost of pooled trust preferred securities is the purchase price of the securities, net of cumulative credit related other-than-temporary impairment charges, determined using an expected cash flows model. The most significant input to the expected cash flows model is the expected payment deferral rate for each pooled trust preferred security. The Corporation evaluates the financial metrics, such as capital ratios and non-performing assets ratios, of the individual financial institution issuers that comprise each pooled trust preferred security to estimate its expected deferral rate.
Based on management’s evaluations, corporate debt securities with a fair value of
$101.4 million
were not subject to any additional other-than-temporary impairment charges as of
September 30, 2014
. The Corporation does not have the intent to sell and does not believe it will more likely than not be required to sell any of these securities prior to a recovery of their fair value to amortized cost, which may be at maturity.
As mandated by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act), in December 2013, five regulatory bodies issued final rulings (Final Rules) implementing certain prohibitions and restrictions on the ability of a banking entity and non-bank financial company supervised by the Federal Reserve Board to engage in proprietary trading and have certain ownership interests in, or relationships with, a "covered fund" (the so-called "Volcker Rule"). The Final Rules generally treat as a covered fund any entity that would be an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (1940 Act) but for the application of the exemptions from SEC registration set forth in Section 3(c)(1) (fewer than 100 beneficial owners) or Section 3(c)(7) (qualified purchasers) of the 1940 Act. The Final Rules also require regulated entities to establish an internal compliance program that is consistent with the extent to which it engages in activities covered by the Volcker Rule, which must include making regular reports about those activities to regulators. Although the Final Rules provide some tiering of compliance and reporting obligations based on size, the fundamental prohibitions of the Volcker Rule apply to banking entities of any size, including the Corporation. Banking entities have until July 21, 2015 to conform their activities and investments to the requirements of the Final Rules. The Corporation does not engage in proprietary trading or in any other activities prohibited by the Final Rules. Based on the Corporation's evaluation of its investments, none fall within the definition of a "covered fund" and would need to be disposed
15
of by July 21, 2015. Therefore, it does not currently expect that the Final Rules will have a material effect on its business, financial condition or results of operations.
NOTE E – Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses
Loans, Net of Unearned Income
Loans, net of unearned income are summarized as follows:
September 30,
2014
December 31, 2013
(in thousands)
Real-estate - commercial mortgage
$
5,156,979
$
5,101,922
Commercial - industrial, financial and agricultural
3,691,262
3,628,420
Real-estate - home equity
1,733,036
1,764,197
Real-estate - residential mortgage
1,372,033
1,337,380
Real-estate - construction
687,728
573,672
Consumer
278,219
283,124
Leasing and other
120,144
99,256
Overdrafts
2,646
4,045
Loans, gross of unearned income
13,042,047
12,792,016
Unearned income
(11,642
)
(9,796
)
Loans, net of unearned income
$
13,030,405
$
12,782,220
Allowance for Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses consists of the allowance for loan losses and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments. The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of incurred losses in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date and is recorded as a reduction to loans. The reserve for unfunded lending commitments represents management’s estimate of incurred losses in its unfunded loan commitments and is recorded in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. The allowance for credit losses is increased by charges to expense, through the provision for credit losses, and decreased by charge-offs, net of recoveries.
The Corporation’s allowance for credit losses includes: (1) specific allowances allocated to loans evaluated for impairment under the FASB's ASC Section 310-10-35; and (2) allowances calculated for pools of loans measured for impairment under FASB ASC Subtopic 450-20.
The Corporation segments its loan portfolio by general loan type, or "portfolio segments," as presented in the table under the heading, "Loans, Net of Unearned Income," above. Certain portfolio segments are further disaggregated and evaluated collectively for impairment based on "class segments," which are largely based on the type of collateral underlying each loan. For commercial loans, class segments include loans secured by collateral and unsecured loans. Construction loan class segments include loans secured by commercial real estate, loans to commercial borrowers secured by residential real estate and loans to individuals secured by residential real estate. Consumer loan class segments include direct consumer installment loans and indirect automobile loans.
The following table presents the components of the allowance for credit losses:
September 30,
2014
December 31,
2013
(in thousands)
Allowance for loan losses
$
189,477
$
202,780
Reserve for unfunded lending commitments
1,631
2,137
Allowance for credit losses
$
191,108
$
204,917
16
The following table presents the activity in the allowance for credit losses:
Three months ended September 30
Nine months ended September 30
2014
2013
2014
2013
(in thousands)
Balance at beginning of period
$
193,442
$
217,626
$
204,917
$
225,439
Loans charged off
(9,604
)
(18,108
)
(31,348
)
(61,597
)
Recoveries of loans previously charged off
3,770
3,820
8,039
10,996
Net loans charged off
(5,834
)
(14,288
)
(23,309
)
(50,601
)
Provision for credit losses
3,500
9,500
9,500
38,000
Balance at end of period
$
191,108
$
212,838
$
191,108
$
212,838
The following table presents the activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment:
Real Estate -
Commercial
Mortgage
Commercial -
Industrial,
Financial and
Agricultural
Real Estate -
Home
Equity
Real Estate -
Residential
Mortgage
Real Estate -
Construction
Consumer
Leasing
and other
and
overdrafts
Unallocated
Total
(in thousands)
Three months ended September 30, 2014
Balance at June 30, 2014
$
49,842
$
49,084
$
32,041
$
32,744
$
11,331
$
3,306
$
1,851
$
11,486
$
191,685
Loans charged off
(1,557
)
(5,167
)
(1,492
)
(231
)
(313
)
(538
)
(306
)
—
(9,604
)
Recoveries of loans previously charged off
1,167
1,013
336
95
470
448
241
—
3,770
Net loans charged off
(390
)
(4,154
)
(1,156
)
(136
)
157
(90
)
(65
)
—
(5,834
)
Provision for loan losses (1)
(278
)
6,110
406
397
(312
)
244
180
(3,121
)
3,626
Balance at September 30, 2014
$
49,174
$
51,040
$
31,291
$
33,005
$
11,176
$
3,460
$
1,966
$
8,365
$
189,477
Three months ended September 30, 2013
Balance at June 30, 2013
$
58,696
$
57,557
$
25,736
$
32,684
$
14,471
$
2,497
$
2,925
$
21,865
$
216,431
Loans charged off
(3,724
)
(9,394
)
(2,365
)
(767
)
(598
)
(473
)
(787
)
—
(18,108
)
Recoveries of loans previously charged off
185
2,295
198
245
379
294
224
—
3,820
Net loans charged off
(3,539
)
(7,099
)
(2,167
)
(522
)
(219
)
(179
)
(563
)
—
(14,288
)
Provision for loan losses (1)
3,470
1,437
4,451
1,595
(1,221
)
610
620
(2,619
)
8,343
Balance at September 30, 2013
$
58,627
$
51,895
$
28,020
$
33,757
$
13,031
$
2,928
$
2,982
$
19,246
$
210,486
Nine months ended September 30, 2014
Balance at December 31, 2013
$
55,659
$
50,330
$
28,222
$
33,082
$
12,649
$
3,260
$
3,370
$
16,208
$
202,780
Loans charged off
(5,084
)
(15,804
)
(4,377
)
(2,166
)
(745
)
(1,738
)
(1,434
)
—
(31,348
)
Recoveries of loans previously charged off
1,641
2,532
869
319
852
1,059
767
—
8,039
Net loans charged off
(3,443
)
(13,272
)
(3,508
)
(1,847
)
107
(679
)
(667
)
—
(23,309
)
Provision for loan losses (1)
(3,042
)
13,982
6,577
1,770
(1,580
)
879
(737
)
(7,843
)
10,006
Balance at September 30, 2014
$
49,174
$
51,040
$
31,291
$
33,005
$
11,176
$
3,460
$
1,966
$
8,365
$
189,477
Nine months ended September 30, 2013
Balance at December 31, 2012
$
62,928
$
60,205
$
22,776
$
34,536
$
17,287
$
2,367
$
2,752
$
21,052
$
223,903
Loans charged off
(13,050
)
(24,856
)
(6,735
)
(8,282
)
(5,181
)
(1,456
)
(2,037
)
—
(61,597
)
Recoveries of loans previously charged off
2,754
3,430
721
442
1,794
1,206
649
—
10,996
Net loans charged off
(10,296
)
(21,426
)
(6,014
)
(7,840
)
(3,387
)
(250
)
(1,388
)
—
(50,601
)
Provision for loan losses (1)
5,995
13,116
11,258
7,061
(869
)
811
1,618
(1,806
)
37,184
Balance at September 30, 2013
$
58,627
$
51,895
$
28,020
$
33,757
$
13,031
$
2,928
$
2,982
$
19,246
$
210,486
(1)
The provision for loan losses excluded a
$126,000
and
$506,000
decrease, respectively, in the reserve for unfunded lending commitments for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
and excluded a
$1.2 million
and
$816,000
increase, respectively, in the reserve for unfunded lending commitments for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
. The total provision for credit losses, comprised of allocations for both funded and unfunded loans, was
$3.5 million
and
$9.5 million
, respectively, for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
and
$9.5 million
and
$38.0 million
, respectively, for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
.
17
The following table presents loans, net of unearned income and their related allowance for loan losses, by portfolio segment:
Real Estate -
Commercial
Mortgage
Commercial -
Industrial,
Financial and
Agricultural
Real Estate -
Home
Equity
Real Estate -
Residential
Mortgage
Real Estate -
Construction
Consumer
Leasing
and other
and
overdrafts
Unallocated
(1)
Total
(in thousands)
Allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2014:
Measured for impairment under FASB ASC Subtopic 450-20
$
32,951
$
39,098
$
21,666
$
11,503
$
6,009
$
3,439
$
1,966
$
8,365
$
124,997
Evaluated for impairment under FASB ASC Section 310-10-35
16,223
11,942
9,625
21,502
5,167
21
—
N/A
64,480
$
49,174
$
51,040
$
31,291
$
33,005
$
11,176
$
3,460
$
1,966
$
8,365
$
189,477
Loans, net of unearned income at September 30, 2014:
Measured for impairment under FASB ASC Subtopic 450-20
$
5,095,263
$
3,655,162
$
1,719,049
$
1,319,333
$
658,822
$
278,196
$
111,148
N/A
$
12,836,973
Evaluated for impairment under FASB ASC Section 310-10-35
61,716
36,100
13,987
52,700
28,906
23
—
N/A
193,432
$
5,156,979
$
3,691,262
$
1,733,036
$
1,372,033
$
687,728
$
278,219
$
111,148
N/A
$
13,030,405
Allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2013:
Measured for impairment under FASB ASC Subtopic 450-20
$
43,262
$
38,025
$
18,482
$
11,494
$
8,648
$
2,911
$
2,982
$
19,246
$
145,050
Evaluated for impairment under FASB ASC Section 310-10-35
15,365
13,870
9,538
22,263
4,383
17
—
N/A
65,436
$
58,627
$
51,895
$
28,020
$
33,757
$
13,031
$
2,928
$
2,982
$
19,246
$
210,486
Loans, net of unearned income at September 30, 2013:
Measured for impairment under FASB ASC Subtopic 450-20
$
5,001,851
$
3,593,038
$
1,758,492
$
1,277,200
$
543,268
$
296,122
$
97,749
N/A
$
12,567,720
Evaluated for impairment under FASB ASC Section 310-10-35
61,522
52,232
15,062
50,269
34,074
20
—
N/A
213,179
$
5,063,373
$
3,645,270
$
1,773,554
$
1,327,469
$
577,342
$
296,142
$
97,749
N/A
$
12,780,899
(1)
The unallocated allowance, which was approximately
4%
and
9%
of the total allowance for credit losses as of
September 30, 2014
and
September 30, 2013
, respectively, was, in the opinion of management, reasonable and appropriate given that the estimates used in the allocation process are inherently imprecise.
N/A – Not applicable.
Impaired Loans
A loan is considered to be impaired if it is probable that all amounts will not be collected according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans consist of all loans on non-accrual status and accruing troubled debt restructurings (TDRs). An allowance for loan losses is established for an impaired loan if its carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value. Impaired loans to borrowers with total outstanding commitments greater than or equal to
$1.0 million
are evaluated individually for impairment. Impaired loans to borrowers with total outstanding commitments less than
$1.0 million
are pooled and measured for impairment collectively. As of
September 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
, substantially all of the Corporation’s individually evaluated impaired loans with total outstanding balances greater than or equal to
$1.0 million
were measured based on the estimated fair value of each loan’s collateral. Collateral could be in the form of real estate, in the case of impaired commercial mortgages and construction loans, or business assets, such as accounts receivable or inventory, in the case of commercial and industrial loans. Commercial and industrial loans may also be secured by real property.
As of
September 30, 2014
and
2013
, approximately
77%
and
89%
, respectively, of impaired loans with principal balances greater than or equal to
$1.0 million
, whose primary collateral is real estate, were measured at estimated fair value using state certified third-party appraisals that had been updated within the preceding 12 months.
When updated certified appraisals are not obtained for loans to commercial borrowers evaluated for impairment under FASB ASC Section 310-10-35 that are secured by real estate, fair values are estimated based on the original appraisal values, as long as the original appraisal indicated a strong loan-to-value position and, in the opinion of the Corporation's internal loan evaluation staff, there has not been a significant deterioration in the collateral value since the original appraisal was performed. Original appraisals are typically used only when the estimated collateral value, as adjusted appropriately for the age of the appraisal, results in a current loan-to-value ratio that is lower than the Corporation's loan-to-value requirements for new loans, generally less than
70%
.
18
The following table presents total impaired loans by class segment:
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Recorded
Investment
Related
Allowance
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Recorded
Investment
Related
Allowance
(in thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
Real estate - commercial mortgage
$
26,102
$
23,280
$
—
$
28,892
$
24,494
$
—
Commercial - secured
19,100
15,283
—
23,890
21,383
—
Real estate - home equity
—
—
—
399
300
—
Real estate - residential mortgage
1,075
1,075
—
—
—
—
Construction - commercial residential
20,725
14,761
—
18,943
13,740
—
Construction - commercial
1,361
1,245
—
2,996
1,976
—
68,363
55,644
75,120
61,893
With a related allowance recorded:
Real estate - commercial mortgage
47,938
38,436
16,223
43,282
35,830
14,444
Commercial - secured
29,939
19,990
11,336
34,267
22,324
13,315
Commercial - unsecured
974
827
606
1,113
1,048
752
Real estate - home equity
19,810
13,987
9,625
20,383
14,337
9,059
Real estate - residential mortgage
62,182
51,625
21,502
63,682
51,097
21,745
Construction - commercial residential
18,046
11,990
4,769
25,769
14,579
3,493
Construction - commercial
1,834
629
260
485
195
77
Construction - other
452
281
138
719
548
301
Consumer - direct
18
18
16
11
11
10
Consumer - indirect
5
5
5
2
2
2
181,198
137,788
64,480
189,713
139,971
63,198
Total
$
249,561
$
193,432
$
64,480
$
264,833
$
201,864
$
63,198
As of
September 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
, there were
$55.6 million
and
$61.9 million
, respectively, of impaired loans that did not have a related allowance for loan loss. The estimated fair values of the collateral for these loans exceeded their carrying amount, or they were previously charged down to realizable collateral values. Accordingly, no specific valuation allowance was considered to be necessary.
19
The following table presents average impaired loans by class segment:
Three months ended September 30
Nine months ended September 30
2014
2013
2014
2013
Average
Recorded
Investment
Interest
Income
Recognized (1)
Average
Recorded
Investment
Interest
Income
Recognized (1)
Average
Recorded
Investment
Interest
Income
Recognized (1)
Average
Recorded
Investment
Interest
Income
Recognized (1)
(in thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
Real estate - commercial mortgage
$
23,056
$
78
$
27,120
$
113
$
23,524
$
244
$
29,630
394
Commercial - secured
18,903
29
33,644
49
20,014
98
32,528
131
Commercial - unsecured
—
—
—
—
—
—
33
—
Real estate - home equity
150
—
300
—
225
1
253
1
Real estate - residential mortgage
1,236
7
747
4
697
13
869
25
Construction - commercial residential
14,881
51
20,809
66
16,052
173
21,730
200
Construction - commercial
1,060
—
2,021
—
1,514
—
3,500
2
59,286
165
84,641
232
62,026
529
88,543
753
With a related allowance recorded:
Real estate - commercial mortgage
38,469
130
37,962
158
37,794
394
46,213
563
Commercial - secured
19,764
30
22,771
34
21,404
101
29,317
115
Commercial - unsecured
850
1
1,260
1
847
3
1,502
4
Real estate - home equity
14,116
30
14,761
17
14,106
78
14,031
49
Real estate - residential mortgage
51,283
298
51,365
290
51,257
894
52,581
924
Construction - commercial residential
11,189
38
12,053
39
10,480
100
11,774
121
Construction - commercial
942
—
525
—
567
—
1,641
3
Construction - other
281
—
501
—
414
—
517
1
Consumer - direct
18
—
18
—
15
—
21
—
Consumer - indirect
6
—
3
—
4
—
1
—
Leasing and other and overdrafts
—
—
—
—
—
—
14
—
136,918
527
141,219
539
136,888
1,570
157,612
1,780
Total
$
196,204
$
692
$
225,860
$
771
$
198,914
$
2,099
$
246,155
2,533
(1)
All impaired loans, excluding accruing TDRs, were non-accrual loans. Interest income recognized for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
represents amounts earned on accruing TDRs.
20
Credit Quality Indicators and Non-performing Assets
The following table presents internal credit risk ratings for real estate - commercial mortgages, commercial - secured loans, commercial - unsecured loans, construction - commercial residential loans and construction - commercial loans:
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard or Lower
Total
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
(dollars in thousands)
Real estate - commercial mortgage
$
4,877,904
$
4,763,987
$
113,650
$
141,013
$
165,425
$
196,922
$
5,156,979
$
5,101,922
Commercial - secured
3,243,731
3,167,168
138,136
111,613
129,273
125,382
3,511,140
3,404,163
Commercial - unsecured
162,620
209,836
12,246
11,666
5,256
2,755
180,122
224,257
Total commercial - industrial, financial and agricultural
3,406,351
3,377,004
150,382
123,279
134,529
128,137
3,691,262
3,628,420
Construction - commercial residential
170,027
146,041
28,517
31,522
42,875
57,806
241,419
235,369
Construction - commercial
370,187
258,441
1,469
2,932
5,550
8,124
377,206
269,497
Total construction (excluding Construction - other)
540,214
404,482
29,986
34,454
48,425
65,930
618,625
504,866
$
8,824,469
$
8,545,473
$
294,018
$
298,746
$
348,379
$
390,989
$
9,466,866
$
9,235,208
% of Total
93.2
%
92.6
%
3.1
%
3.2
%
3.7
%
4.2
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
The following is a summary of the Corporation's internal risk rating categories:
•
Pass
: These loans do not currently pose undue credit risk and can range from the highest to average quality, depending on the degree of potential risk.
•
Special Mention
: These loans constitute an undue and unwarranted credit risk, but not to a point of justifying a classification of substandard. Loans in this category are currently acceptable, but are nevertheless potentially weak.
•
Substandard or Lower
: These loans are inadequately protected by current sound worth and paying capacity of the borrower. There exists a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the normal repayment of the debt.
The Corporation believes that internal risk ratings are the most relevant credit quality indicator for the class segments presented above. The migration of loans through the various internal risk rating categories is a significant component of the allowance for credit loss methodology, which bases the probability of default on this migration. Assigning risk ratings involves judgment. Risk ratings are initially assigned to loans by loan officers and are reviewed on a regular basis by credit administration staff. The Corporation's loan review officers provide a separate assessment of risk rating accuracy. Ratings may be changed based on the ongoing monitoring procedures performed by loan officers or credit administration staff, or if specific loan review activities identify a deterioration or an improvement in the loan. The risk rating process allows management to identify riskier credits in a timely manner and to allocate resources to managing troubled accounts.
The Corporation does not assign internal risk ratings to smaller balance, homogeneous loans, such as home equity, residential mortgage, consumer, leasing and other and construction loans to individuals secured by residential real estate. For these loans, the most relevant credit quality indicator is delinquency status. The migration of these loans through the various delinquency status categories is a significant component of the allowance for credit losses methodology, which bases the probability of default on this migration.
21
The following table presents a summary of delinquency and non-performing status for home equity, real estate - residential mortgages, construction loans to individuals and consumer, leasing and other loans by class segment:
Performing
Delinquent (1)
Non-performing (2)
Total
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
(dollars in thousands)
Real estate - home equity
$
1,707,659
$
1,731,185
$
10,306
$
16,029
$
15,071
$
16,983
$
1,733,036
$
1,764,197
Real estate - residential mortgage
1,319,002
1,282,754
24,896
23,279
28,135
31,347
1,372,033
1,337,380
Construction - other
68,822
68,258
—
—
281
548
69,103
68,806
Consumer - direct
115,449
126,666
3,025
3,586
2,359
2,391
120,833
132,643
Consumer - indirect
155,027
147,017
2,203
3,312
156
152
157,386
150,481
Total consumer
270,476
273,683
5,228
6,898
2,515
2,543
278,219
283,124
Leasing and other and overdrafts
110,491
92,876
269
581
388
48
111,148
93,505
$
3,476,450
$
3,448,756
$
40,699
$
46,787
$
46,390
$
51,469
$
3,563,539
$
3,547,012
% of Total
97.6
%
97.2
%
1.2
%
1.3
%
1.3
%
1.5
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
(1)
Includes all accruing loans
31
days to
89
days past due.
(2)
Includes all accruing loans
90
days or more past due and all non-accrual loans.
The following table presents non-performing assets:
September 30,
2014
December 31,
2013
(in thousands)
Non-accrual loans
$
126,420
$
133,753
Accruing loans greater than 90 days past due
17,428
20,524
Total non-performing loans
143,848
154,277
Other real estate owned (OREO)
13,489
15,052
Total non-performing assets
$
157,337
$
169,329
The following table presents TDRs, by class segment:
September 30,
2014
December 31,
2013
(in thousands)
Real-estate - residential mortgage
$
30,850
$
28,815
Real-estate - commercial mortgage
18,869
19,758
Construction - commercial residential
9,251
10,117
Commercial - secured
5,042
7,933
Real estate - home equity
2,904
1,365
Commercial - unsecured
73
112
Consumer - direct
18
11
Consumer - indirect
5
—
Total accruing TDRs
67,012
68,111
Non-accrual TDRs (1)
27,724
30,209
Total TDRs
$
94,736
$
98,320
(1)
Included within non-accrual loans in the preceding table detailing non-performing assets.
As of
September 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
, there were
$4.6 million
and
$9.6 million
, respectively, of commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers whose loans were modified under TDRs.
22
The following table presents TDRs, by class segment, as of
September 30, 2014
and
2013
that were modified during the
three
and nine months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
:
Three months ended September 30
Nine months ended September 30
2014
2013
2014
2013
Number of Loans
Recorded Investment
Number of Loans
Recorded Investment
Number of Loans
Recorded Investment
Number of Loans
Recorded Investment
(dollars in thousands)
Real estate - commercial mortgage
1
$
391
4
$
3,774
10
$
10,195
13
$
8,428
Construction - commercial residential
—
—
2
4,427
2
1,914
5
9,542
Real estate - residential mortgage
3
256
5
836
18
2,092
44
6,861
Real estate - home equity
6
764
14
1,071
26
1,627
42
2,928
Commercial - secured
3
1,214
—
—
4
1,357
8
592
Consumer - indirect
—
—
—
—
4
7
—
—
Consumer - direct
—
—
—
—
6
8
9
2
Commercial - unsecured
—
—
—
—
—
—
1
15
Total
13
$
2,625
25
$
10,108
70
$
17,200
122
$
28,368
The following table presents TDRs, by class segment, as of
September 30, 2014
and
2013
that were modified within the previous 12 months and had a post-modification payment default during the nine months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
. The Corporation defines a payment default as a single missed payment.
2014
2013
Number of Loans
Recorded Investment
Number of Loans
Recorded Investment
(dollars in thousands)
Real estate - residential mortgage
8
$
1,147
20
$
3,460
Real estate - home equity
5
724
18
1,419
Construction - commercial residential
3
2,509
1
608
Real estate - commercial mortgage
1
35
5
2,062
Commercial - secured
3
415
1
100
Consumer - direct
—
—
3
1
Total
20
$
4,830
48
$
7,650
23
The following table presents past due status and non-accrual loans by portfolio segment and class segment:
September 30, 2014
31-59
Days Past
Due
60-89
Days Past
Due
≥ 90 Days
Past Due
and
Accruing
Non-
accrual
Total ≥ 90
Days
Total Past
Due
Current
Total
(in thousands)
Real estate - commercial mortgage
$
19,506
$
5,074
$
1,755
$
42,847
$
44,602
$
69,182
$
5,087,797
$
5,156,979
Commercial - secured
7,530
1,215
2,292
30,231
32,523
41,268
3,469,872
3,511,140
Commercial - unsecured
1,528
209
—
754
754
2,491
177,631
180,122
Total commercial - industrial, financial and agricultural
9,058
1,424
2,292
30,985
33,277
43,759
3,647,503
3,691,262
Real estate - home equity
8,094
2,212
3,988
11,083
15,071
25,377
1,707,659
1,733,036
Real estate - residential mortgage
17,102
7,794
6,285
21,850
28,135
53,031
1,319,002
1,372,033
Construction - commercial residential
215
—
205
17,500
17,705
17,920
223,499
241,419
Construction - commercial
—
—
—
1,874
1,874
1,874
375,332
377,206
Construction - other
—
—
—
281
281
281
68,822
69,103
Total real estate - construction
215
—
205
19,655
19,860
20,075
667,653
687,728
Consumer - direct
2,032
993
2,359
—
2,359
5,384
115,449
120,833
Consumer - indirect
1,815
388
156
—
156
2,359
155,027
157,386
Total consumer
3,847
1,381
2,515
—
2,515
7,743
270,476
278,219
Leasing and other and overdrafts
185
84
388
—
388
657
110,491
111,148
Total
$
58,007
$
17,969
$
17,428
$
126,420
$
143,848
$
219,824
$
12,810,581
$
13,030,405
December 31, 2013
31-59
Days Past
Due
60-89
Days Past
Due
≥ 90 Days
Past Due
and
Accruing
Non-
accrual
Total ≥ 90
Days
Total Past
Due
Current
Total
(in thousands)
Real estate - commercial mortgage
$
15,474
$
4,009
$
3,502
$
40,566
$
44,068
$
63,551
$
5,038,371
$
5,101,922
Commercial - secured
8,916
1,365
1,311
35,774
37,085
47,366
3,356,797
3,404,163
Commercial - unsecured
332
125
—
936
936
1,393
222,864
224,257
Total commercial - industrial, financial and agricultural
9,248
1,490
1,311
36,710
38,021
48,759
3,579,661
3,628,420
Real estate - home equity
13,555
2,474
3,711
13,272
16,983
33,012
1,731,185
1,764,197
Real estate - residential mortgage
16,969
6,310
9,065
22,282
31,347
54,626
1,282,754
1,337,380
Construction - commercial residential
—
645
346
18,202
18,548
19,193
216,176
235,369
Construction - commercial
14
—
—
2,171
2,171
2,185
267,312
269,497
Construction - other
—
—
—
548
548
548
68,258
68,806
Total real estate - construction
14
645
346
20,921
21,267
21,926
551,746
573,672
Consumer - direct
2,091
1,495
2,391
—
2,391
5,977
126,666
132,643
Consumer - indirect
2,864
448
150
2
152
3,464
147,017
150,481
Total consumer
4,955
1,943
2,541
2
2,543
9,441
273,683
283,124
Leasing and other and overdrafts
559
22
48
—
48
629
92,876
93,505
Total
$
60,774
$
16,893
$
20,524
$
133,753
$
154,277
$
231,944
$
12,550,276
$
12,782,220
24
NOTE F – Mortgage Servicing Rights
The following table summarizes the changes in mortgage servicing rights (MSRs), which are included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets:
Three months ended September 30
Nine months ended September 30
2014
2013
2014
2013
(in thousands)
Amortized cost:
Balance at beginning of period
$
42,586
$
41,750
$
42,452
$
39,737
Originations of mortgage servicing rights
1,456
2,909
3,807
10,371
Amortization
(1,664
)
(2,031
)
(3,881
)
(7,480
)
Balance at end of period
$
42,378
$
42,628
$
42,378
$
42,628
Valuation allowance:
Balance at beginning of period
$
—
$
(1,690
)
$
—
$
(3,680
)
Reversals
—
1,690
—
3,680
Balance at end of period
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
Net MSRs at end of period
$
42,378
$
42,628
$
42,378
$
42,628
MSRs represent the economic value of existing contractual rights to service mortgage loans that have been sold. Accordingly, actual and expected prepayments of the underlying mortgage loans can impact the value of MSRs.
The Corporation estimates the fair value of its MSRs by discounting the estimated cash flows from servicing income, net of expense, over the expected life of the underlying loans at a discount rate commensurate with the risk associated with these assets. Expected life is based on the contractual terms of the loans, as adjusted for prepayment projections.
No
adjustment to the valuation allowance was necessary for three and nine months ended September 30, 2014. A decrease to the valuation allowance of
$1.7 million
and
$3.7 million
was recorded for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013.
The Corporation accounts for MSRs at the lower of amortized cost or fair value. As of
September 30, 2014
, the estimated fair value of MSRs was
$47.9 million
, which exceeded their book value. Therefore, no increase to the valuation allowance was necessary during the three or
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
.
NOTE G – Stock-Based Compensation
The fair value of equity awards granted to employees is recognized as compensation expense over the period during which employees are required to provide service in exchange for such awards. The Corporation grants equity awards to employees, consisting of stock options, restricted stock, RSUs and PSUs under its Amended and Restated Equity and Cash Incentive Compensation Plan (Employee Option Plan). In addition, employees may purchase stock under the Corporation’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
The Corporation also grants stock equity awards to non-employee members of the board of directors under its 2011 Directors’ Equity Participation Plan (Directors’ Plan). Under the Directors’ Plan, the Corporation can grant equity awards to non-employee holding company and subsidiary bank directors in the form of stock options, restricted stock or common stock.
Equity awards issued under the Employee Option Plan are generally granted annually and become fully vested over or after a
three
year vesting period. Equity awards under the Directors' Plan generally vest immediately upon grant. Certain events, as defined in the Employee Option Plan and the Directors' Plan, result in the acceleration of the vesting of equity awards.
25
The following table presents compensation expense and the related tax benefits for equity awards recognized in the consolidated statements of income:
Three months ended September 30
Nine months ended September 30
2014
2013
2014
2013
(in thousands)
Stock-based compensation expense
$
1,288
$
979
$
4,310
$
4,186
Tax benefit
(358
)
(272
)
(1,067
)
(1,183
)
Stock-based compensation expense, net of tax
$
930
$
707
$
3,243
$
3,003
Stock option fair values are estimated through the use of the Black-Scholes valuation methodology as of the date of grant. Stock options carry terms of up to
ten
years. The fair value of restricted stock is based on the trading price of the Corporation’s stock on the date of grant. Restricted stock awards earn dividends during the vesting period, which are forfeitable if the awards do not vest.
During the
three
and
nine months ended September 30,
2014
, the Corporation granted approximately
389,000
PSUs,
289,000
stock options and
105,000
RSUs under its Employee Option Plan. The fair value of RSUs and a majority of PSUs are based on the trading price of the Corporation's stock on the date of grant. The fair value of certain PSUs are estimated through the use of the Monte Carlo valuation methodology as of the date of grant. RSUs become fully vested over or after a
three
year vesting period, however, certain events, as defined in the Employee Option Plan, can result in the acceleration of the vesting of RSUs. RSUs and PSUs earn dividends during the vesting period, which are forfeitable if the awards do not vest. The fair value of PSUs, which is recognized as compensation expense over the period during which employees are required to provide service in exchange for such awards, may vary, based on the expectations for actual performance relative to defined performance measures. As of
September 30, 2014
, the Employee Option Plan had
11.2 million
shares reserved for future grants through
2023
. During the
nine months ended September 30,
2014
, the Corporation granted approximately
13,000
shares of stock under its Directors' Plan. As of
September 30, 2014
, the Directors’ Plan had approximately
424,000
shares reserved for future grants through
2021
.
NOTE H – Employee Benefit Plans
The Corporation maintains a defined benefit pension plan (Pension Plan) for certain employees, which was curtailed effective
January 1, 2008
. Contributions to the Pension Plan are actuarially determined and funded annually, if required. Pension Plan assets are invested in: money markets; fixed income securities, including corporate bonds, U.S. Treasury securities and common trust funds; and equity securities, including common stocks and common stock mutual funds.
The net periodic benefit cost for the Corporation’s Pension Plan, as determined by a third-party actuary, consisted of the following components:
Three months ended September 30
Nine months ended September 30
2014
2013
2014
2013
(in thousands)
Service cost (1)
$
92
$
51
$
276
$
153
Interest cost
853
772
2,559
2,316
Expected return on plan assets
(811
)
(800
)
(2,432
)
(2,400
)
Net amortization and deferral
244
596
732
1,788
Net periodic benefit cost
$
378
$
619
$
1,135
$
1,857
(1)
The Pension Plan service cost recorded for the
three
and
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
, respectively, was related to administrative costs associated with the plan and was not due to the accrual of additional participant benefits.
The Corporation currently provides medical and life insurance benefits under a postretirement benefits plan (Postretirement Plan) to certain retired full-time employees who were employees of the Corporation prior to
January 1, 1998
.
Effective February 1, 2014, the Corporation amended the Postretirement Plan, making all active full-time employees ineligible for benefits under this plan. As a result of this amendment, the Corporation recorded a
$1.5 million
gain in 2014, as determined by a third-party actuary and included as a component of salaries and employee benefits on the consolidated statements of income. The gain resulted from the recognition of the remaining prior service cost prior to the amendment date as of December 31, 2013. In addition, this amendment resulted in a
$3.3 million
decrease in the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and a corresponding increase in unrecognized prior service cost credits.
26
The net periodic benefit (income) cost of the Corporation’s Postretirement Plan as determined by consulting actuaries, consisted of the following components, excluding the impact of the
$1.5 million
plan amendment gain:
Three months ended September 30
Nine months ended September 30
2014
2013
2014
2013
(in thousands)
Service cost (1)
$
—
$
57
$
15
$
171
Interest cost
48
81
157
243
Net accretion and deferral
(84
)
(91
)
(263
)
(273
)
Net periodic benefit (income) cost
$
(36
)
$
47
$
(91
)
$
141
(1)
As a result of the plan amendment, additional participant benefits are not accrued under the Postretirement Plan after February 1, 2014. Service costs recorded after the effective date of the amendment represent administrative costs associated with the plan.
The Corporation recognizes the funded status of its Pension Plan and Postretirement Plan on the consolidated balance sheets and recognizes the change in that funded status through other comprehensive income.
NOTE I – Derivative Financial Instruments
The Corporation manages its exposure to certain interest rate and foreign currency risks through the use of derivatives. None of the Corporation's outstanding derivative contracts are designated as hedges and none are entered into for speculative purposes. Derivative instruments are carried at fair value, with changes in fair values recognized in earnings as components of non-interest income and non-interest expense on the consolidated statements of income.
Derivative contracts create counterparty credit risk with both the Corporation's customers and with institutional derivative counterparties. The Corporation manages credit risk through its credit approval processes, monitoring procedures and obtaining adequate collateral, when the Corporation determines it is appropriate to do so.
Mortgage Banking Derivatives
In connection with its mortgage banking activities, the Corporation enters into commitments to originate certain fixed rate residential mortgage loans for customers, also referred to as interest rate locks. In addition, the Corporation enters into forward commitments for the future sales or purchases of mortgage-backed securities to or from third-party counterparties to hedge the effect of changes in interest rates on the values of both the interest rate locks and mortgage loans held for sale. Forward sales commitments may also be in the form of commitments to sell individual mortgage loans or interest rate locks at a fixed price at a future date. The amount necessary to settle each interest rate lock is based on the price that secondary market investors would pay for loans with similar characteristics, including interest rate and term, as of the date fair value is measured. Gross derivative assets and liabilities are recorded within other assets and other liabilities, respectively, on the consolidated balance sheets, with changes in fair values during the period recorded within mortgage banking income on the consolidated statements of income.
Interest Rate Swaps
The Corporation enters into interest rate swaps with certain qualifying commercial loan customers to meet their interest rate risk management needs. The Corporation simultaneously enters into interest rate swaps with dealer counterparties, with identical notional amounts and terms. The net result of these interest rate swaps is that the customer pays a fixed rate of interest and the Corporation receives a floating rate. These interest rate swaps are derivative financial instruments that are recorded at their fair values within other assets and liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. Changes in fair value during the period are recorded within other non-interest expense on the consolidated statements of income.
Foreign Exchange Contracts
The Corporation enters into foreign exchange contracts to accommodate the needs of its customers. Foreign exchange contracts are commitments to buy or sell foreign currency on a future date at a contractual price. The Corporation offsets its foreign exchange contract exposure with customers by entering into contracts with third-party correspondent financial institutions to mitigate its exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The Corporation also holds certain amounts of foreign currency with international correspondent banks. The Corporation's policy limits the total net foreign currency open positions, which includes all outstanding contracts and foreign account balances, to
$500,000
. Gross derivative assets and liabilities are recorded within other assets and other liabilities, respectively, on the consolidated balance sheets, with changes in fair values during the period recorded within other service charges and fees on the consolidated statements of income.
27
The following table presents a summary of the notional amounts and fair values of derivative financial instruments:
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
Notional
Amount
Asset
(Liability)
Fair Value
Notional
Amount
Asset
(Liability)
Fair Value
(in thousands)
Interest Rate Locks with Customers
Positive fair values
$
92,136
$
1,324
$
75,217
$
867
Negative fair values
937
(16
)
11,393
(59
)
Net interest rate locks with customers
1,308
808
Forward Commitments
Positive fair values
6,165
23
87,904
1,263
Negative fair values
98,323
(392
)
2,373
(5
)
Net forward commitments
(369
)
1,258
Interest Rate Swaps with Customers
Positive fair values
360,442
10,027
111,899
2,105
Negative fair values
54,308
(615
)
105,673
(2,993
)
Net interest rate swaps with customers
9,412
(888
)
Interest Rate Swaps with Dealer Counterparties
Positive fair values
54,308
615
105,673
2,993
Negative fair values
360,442
(10,027
)
111,899
(2,105
)
Net interest rate swaps with dealer counterparties
(9,412
)
888
Foreign Exchange Contracts with Customers
Positive fair values
17,434
959
2,150
24
Negative fair values
6,273
(424
)
12,775
(343
)
Net foreign exchange contracts with customers
535
(319
)
Foreign Exchange Contracts with Correspondent Banks
Positive fair values
6,554
428
17,348
498
Negative fair values
16,988
(871
)
5,872
(48
)
Net foreign exchange contracts with correspondent banks
(443
)
450
Net derivative fair value asset
$
1,031
$
2,197
The following table presents a summary of the fair value gains and losses on derivative financial instruments:
Three months ended September 30
Nine months ended September 30
2014
2013
2014
2013
(in thousands)
Interest rate locks with customers
$
(1,092
)
$
4,717
$
500
$
(3,707
)
Forward commitments
1,374
(12,244
)
(1,627
)
(1,969
)
Interest rate swaps with customers
(40
)
1,009
10,300
(5,270
)
Interest rate swaps with dealer counterparties
40
(1,009
)
(10,300
)
5,270
Foreign exchange contracts with customers
557
(344
)
854
(175
)
Foreign exchange contracts with correspondent banks
(527
)
(50
)
(893
)
910
Net fair value gains (losses) on derivative financial instruments
$
312
$
(7,921
)
$
(1,166
)
$
(4,941
)
28
NOTE J – Fair Value Option
U.S. GAAP permits entities to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value and requires certain disclosures for amounts for which the fair value option is applied. The Corporation has elected to measure mortgage loans held for sale at fair value to more accurately reflect the financial results of its mortgage banking activities in its consolidated financial statements. Derivative financial instruments related to these activities are also recorded at fair value, as noted within Note I, "Derivative Financial Instruments." The Corporation determines fair value for its mortgage loans held for sale based on the price that secondary market investors would pay for loans with similar characteristics, including interest rate and term, as of the date fair value is measured. Changes in fair values during the period are recorded as components of mortgage banking income on the consolidated statements of income. Interest income earned on mortgage loans held for sale is recorded within interest income on the consolidated statements of income.
The following table presents a summary of the Corporation’s mortgage loans held for sale:
September 30,
2014
December 31,
2013
(in thousands)
Cost
$
24,690
$
21,172
Fair value
25,212
21,351
During the three months ended
September 30, 2014
, losses related to changes in fair values of mortgage loans held for sale were
$472,000
, compared to
$343,000
of gains for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
. During the three months ended
September 30, 2013
, gains related to changes in fair values of mortgage loans held for sale were
$2.6 million
, compared to losses of
$784,000
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
.
NOTE K – Balance Sheet Offsetting
Certain financial assets and liabilities may be eligible for offset on the consolidated balance sheets as they are subject to master netting arrangements or similar agreements. The Corporation elects to not offset assets and liabilities subject to such arrangements on the consolidated financial statements.
The Corporation is a party to interest rate swap transactions with financial institution counterparties and customers, disclosed in detail within Note I, "Derivative Financial Instruments." Under these agreements, the Corporation has the right to net settle multiple contracts with the same counterparty in the event of default on, or termination of, any one contract. Cash collateral is posted by the party with a net liability position in accordance with contract thresholds and can be used to settle the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements in the event of default.
Beginning in the first quarter of 2014, the Corporation is also a party to foreign currency exchange contracts with financial institution counterparties, under which the Corporation has the right to net settle multiple contracts with the same counterparty in the event of default on, or termination of, any one contract. As with interest rate swap contracts, cash collateral is posted by the party with a net liability position in accordance with contract thresholds and can be used to settle the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements in the event of default. For additional details, see Note I, "Derivative Financial Instruments."
The Corporation also enters into agreements with customers in which it sells securities subject to an obligation to repurchase the same or similar securities, referred to as repurchase agreements. Under these agreements, the Corporation may transfer legal control over the assets but still maintain effective control through agreements that both entitle and obligate the Corporation to repurchase the assets. Therefore, repurchase agreements are reported as secured borrowings, classified within short-term borrowings on the consolidated balance sheets, while the securities underlying the repurchase agreements remain classified with investment securities on the consolidated balance sheets. The Corporation has no intention of setting off these amounts, therefore, these repurchase agreements are not eligible for offset.
29
The following table presents the Corporation's financial instruments that are eligible for offset, and the effects of offsetting, on the consolidated balance sheets:
Gross Amounts
Gross Amounts Not Offset
Recognized
on the Consolidated
on the
Balance Sheets
Consolidated
Financial
Cash
Net
Balance Sheets
Instruments (1)
Collateral (2)
Amount
(in thousands)
September 30, 2014
Interest rate swap derivative assets
$
10,642
$
(636
)
$
—
$
10,006
Foreign exchange derivative assets with correspondent banks
428
(428
)
—
—
Total
$
11,070
$
(1,064
)
$
—
$
10,006
Interest rate swap derivative liabilities
$
10,642
$
(636
)
$
(9,480
)
$
526
Foreign exchange derivative liabilities with correspondent banks
871
(428
)
(310
)
133
Total
$
11,513
$
(1,064
)
$
(9,790
)
$
659
December 31, 2013
Interest rate swap derivative assets
$
5,098
$
(2,104
)
$
—
$
2,994
Interest rate swap derivative liabilities
$
5,098
$
(2,104
)
$
(730
)
$
2,264
(1)
For interest rate swap and foreign exchange derivative assets, amounts represent any derivative liability fair values that could be offset in the event of counterparty or customer default. For interest rate swap and foreign exchange derivative liabilities, amounts represent any derivative asset fair values that could be offset in the event of counterparty or customer default.
(2)
Amounts represent cash collateral posted on interest rate swap transactions with financial institution counterparties. Interest rate swaps with customers are collateralized by the underlying loans to those borrowers.
NOTE L – Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
The Corporation is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers.
Those financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and letters of credit, which involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized on the Corporation’s consolidated balance sheets. Exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and letters of credit is represented by the outstanding amount of those instruments.
The outstanding amounts of commitments to extend credit and letters of credit were as follows:
September 30,
2014
December 31, 2013
(in thousands)
Commitments to extend credit
$
4,437,607
$
4,379,578
Standby letters of credit
382,526
391,445
Commercial letters of credit
30,067
36,344
The Corporation records a reserve for unfunded lending commitments, which represents management’s estimate of losses associated with unused commitments to extend credit. See Note E, "Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses," for additional details.
Residential Lending
Residential mortgages are originated and sold by the Corporation and consist primarily of conforming, prime loans sold to government sponsored agencies, such as the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac). The Corporation also sells a portion of prime loans to non-government sponsored agency investors.
The Corporation provides customary representations and warranties to investors that specify, among other things, that the loans have been underwritten to the standards established by the investor. The Corporation may be required to repurchase a loan or reimburse the investor for a credit loss incurred on a loan if it is determined that the representations and warranties have not been
30
met. Such repurchases or reimbursements generally result from an underwriting or documentation deficiency. As of
September 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
, total outstanding repurchase requests totaled
$543,000
and
$8.8 million
, respectively. During the first quarter of
2014
, the Corporation entered into a settlement agreement with a secondary market investor. Under this agreement, the Corporation agreed to pay this investor
$4.5 million
to settle all outstanding and potential future repurchase requests under a series of specified loan purchase agreements with that secondary market investor. The result of this settlement was a reduction to outstanding repurchase requests of
$7.5 million
and a reduction to reserves for repurchases of
$5.1 million
, resulting in a
$600,000
reduction to operating risk loss on the consolidated statements of income during the nine months ended
September 30, 2014
.
From
2000
to
2011
, the Corporation sold loans to the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh under its Mortgage Partnership Finance Program (MPF Program). No loans were sold under this program during the nine months ended
September 30, 2014
or during 2013 or 2012. The Corporation provided a "credit enhancement" for residential mortgage loans sold under the MPF Program whereby it would assume credit losses in excess of a defined "First Loss Account" (FLA) balance, up to specified amounts. The FLA is funded by the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh based on a percentage of the outstanding principal balance of loans sold. As of
September 30, 2014
, the unpaid principal balance of loans sold under the MPF Program was approximately
$158 million
. As of
September 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
, the reserve for estimated credit losses related to loans sold under the MPF Program was
$2.4 million
and
$2.5 million
, respectively. Required reserves are calculated based on delinquency status and estimated loss rates established through the Corporation's existing allowance for credit losses methodology.
As of
September 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
, the total reserve for losses on residential mortgage loans sold was
$3.3 million
and
$8.6 million
, respectively, including both reserves for credit losses under the MPF Program and reserves for representation and warranty exposures. Management believes that the reserves recorded as of
September 30, 2014
are adequate. However, declines in collateral values, the identification of additional loans to be repurchased, or a deterioration in the credit quality of loans sold under the MPF Program could necessitate additional reserves in the future.
Regulatory Matters
In July 2014, three wholly owned banking subsidiaries of the Corporation, Fulton Bank, N.A., Swineford National Bank and FNB Bank, N.A., each entered into a Stipulation and Consent to the Issuance of a Consent Order (Consent Order) with their primary Federal bank regulatory agency, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, relating to identified deficiencies in a centralized Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering compliance program, which was designed to comply with the requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act, the USA Patriot Act of 2001 and related anti-money laundering regulations (collectively, the "BSA/AML Requirements") as disclosed by the Corporation in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 18, 2014. The Consent Orders require, among other things, that the banking subsidiaries review, assess and take actions to strengthen and enhance their compliance programs related to the BSA/AML Requirements (BSA/AML Compliance Program).
In September 2014, the Corporation and its wholly owned banking subsidiary, Lafayette Ambassador Bank (Lafayette), entered into a consent cease and desist order (Cease and Desist Order) with their primary Federal bank regulatory agency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Reserve Board), as disclosed by the Corporation in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 9, 2014. The Cease and Desist Order requires, among other things, that the Corporation and Lafayette strengthen the BSA/AML Compliance Program and imposes requirements similar to those set forth in the Consent Orders. In addition, the Cease and Desist Order requires the Corporation to engage an independent third-party firm to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the BSA/AML Compliance Program, and that Lafayette engage an independent third-party firm to conduct a retrospective review of account and transaction activity from January 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 associated with high-risk customers to determine whether suspicious activity was properly identified and reported in accordance with the BSA/AML requirements. Based on the results of this review the Reserve Board may require a review of transactions for additional time periods. Further, because the Consent Orders and the Cease and Desist Order relate to the BSA/AML Compliance Program, which is operated jointly for all of the Corporation’s subsidiary banks, management anticipates that one or both of the Corporation's other subsidiary banks will also become subject to an enforcement action related to the BSA/AML Requirements, and the provisions of any such enforcement action may differ from those of the Consent Orders and Cease and Desist Order.
Other Contingencies
The Corporation and its subsidiaries are involved in various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business of the Corporation. The Corporation periodically evaluates the possible impact of pending litigation matters based on, among other factors, the advice of counsel, available insurance coverage and recorded liabilities and reserves for probable legal liabilities and costs. In addition, from time to time, the Corporation is the subject of investigations or other forms of regulatory or governmental inquiry covering a range of possible issues and, in some cases, these may be part of similar reviews of the specified activities of other industry participants. These inquiries could lead to administrative, civil or criminal proceedings, and could possibly result in fines, penalties, restitution or the need to alter the Corporation’s business practices, and cause the Corporation to incur additional costs. The Corporation’s practice is to cooperate fully with regulatory and governmental investigations.
31
As of the date of this report, the Corporation believes that any liabilities, individually or in the aggregate, which may result from the final outcomes of pending proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, the operating results and/or the liquidity of the Corporation. However, legal proceedings are often unpredictable, and the actual results of such proceedings cannot be determined with certainty.
NOTE M – Fair Value Measurements
FASB ASC Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy for the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value using the following three categories (from highest to lowest priority):
•
Level 1 – Inputs that represent quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.
•
Level 2 – Inputs that represent quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, or quoted prices for identical instruments in non-active markets. Also includes valuation techniques whose inputs are derived principally from observable market data other than quoted prices, such as interest rates or other market-corroborated means.
•
Level 3 – Inputs that are largely unobservable, as little or no market data exists for the instrument being valued.
The Corporation has categorized all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis into the above three levels.
The following tables present summaries of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and reported on the consolidated balance sheets:
September 30, 2014
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(in thousands)
Mortgage loans held for sale
$
—
$
25,212
$
—
$
25,212
Available for sale investment securities:
Equity securities
45,278
—
—
45,278
U.S. Government securities
—
200
—
200
U.S. Government sponsored agency securities
—
240
—
240
State and municipal securities
—
257,616
—
257,616
Corporate debt securities
—
93,071
8,356
101,427
Collateralized mortgage obligations
—
955,040
—
955,040
Mortgage-backed securities
—
962,335
—
962,335
Auction rate securities
—
—
148,473
148,473
Total available for sale investments
45,278
2,268,502
156,829
2,470,609
Other assets
17,475
11,988
—
29,463
Total assets
$
62,753
$
2,305,702
$
156,829
$
2,525,284
Other liabilities
$
17,376
$
11,050
$
—
$
28,426
32
December 31, 2013
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(in thousands)
Mortgage loans held for sale
$
—
$
21,351
$
—
$
21,351
Available for sale investment securities:
Equity securities
46,201
—
—
46,201
U.S. Government securities
—
525
—
525
U.S. Government sponsored agency securities
—
726
—
726
State and municipal securities
—
284,849
—
284,849
Corporate debt securities
—
89,662
9,087
98,749
Collateralized mortgage obligations
—
1,032,398
—
1,032,398
Mortgage-backed securities
—
945,712
—
945,712
Auction rate securities
—
—
159,274
159,274
Total available for sale investments
46,201
2,353,872
168,361
2,568,434
Other assets
15,779
7,227
—
23,006
Total assets
$
61,980
$
2,382,450
$
168,361
$
2,612,791
Other liabilities
$
15,648
$
5,161
$
—
$
20,809
The valuation techniques used to measure fair value for the items in the preceding tables are as follows:
•
Mortgage loans held for sale
– This category consists of mortgage loans held for sale that the Corporation has elected to measure at fair value. Fair values as of
September 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
were measured based on the price that secondary market investors were offering for loans with similar characteristics.
•
Available for sale investment securities
– Included within this asset category are both equity and debt securities. Level 2 available for sale debt securities are valued by a third-party pricing service commonly used in the banking industry. The pricing service uses pricing models that vary based on asset class and incorporate available market information, including quoted prices of investment securities with similar characteristics. Because many fixed income securities do not trade on a daily basis, pricing models use available information, as applicable, through processes such as benchmark yield curves, benchmarking of like securities, sector groupings, and matrix pricing.
Standard market inputs include: benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data, including market research publications. For certain security types, additional inputs may be used, or some of the standard market inputs may not be applicable.
Management tests the values provided by the pricing service by obtaining securities prices from an alternative third-party source and comparing the results. This test is done for approximately
75%
of the securities valued by the pricing service. Generally, differences by security in excess of
5%
are researched to reconcile the difference.
•
Equity securities
– Equity securities consist of common stocks of financial institutions (
$39.3 million
at
September 30, 2014
and
$40.6 million
at
December 31, 2013
) and other equity investments (
$6.0 million
at
September 30, 2014
and
$5.6 million
at
December 31, 2013
). These Level 1 investments are measured at fair value based on quoted prices for identical securities in active markets.
•
U.S. Government securities/U.S. Government sponsored agency securities/State and municipal securities/Collateralized mortgage obligations/Mortgage-backed securities
– These debt securities are classified as Level 2 investments. Fair values are determined by a third-party pricing service, as detailed above.
•
Corporate debt securities
– This category consists of subordinated debt issued by financial institutions (
$50.3 million
at
September 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
), single-issuer trust preferred securities issued by financial institutions (
$44.1 million
at
September 30, 2014
and
$40.5 million
at
December 31, 2013
), pooled trust preferred securities issued by financial institutions (
$4.5 million
at
September 30, 2014
and
$5.3 million
at
December 31, 2013
) and other corporate debt issued by non-financial institutions (
$2.6 million
at
September 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
).
Level 2 investments include the Corporation’s holdings of subordinated debt, other corporate debt issued by non-financial institutions and
$40.2 million
and
$36.7 million
of single-issuer trust preferred securities held at
33
September 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
, respectively. The fair values for these corporate debt securities are determined by a third-party pricing service, as detailed above.
Level 3 investments include the Corporation’s investments in pooled trust preferred securities and certain single-issuer trust preferred securities (
$3.9 million
at
September 30, 2014
and
$3.8 million
at
December 31, 2013
). The fair values of these securities were determined based on quotes provided by third-party brokers who determined fair values based predominantly on internal valuation models which were not indicative prices or binding offers. The Corporation’s third-party pricing service cannot derive fair values for these securities primarily due to inactive markets for similar investments. Level 3 values are tested by management primarily through trend analysis, by comparing current values to those reported at the end of the preceding calendar quarter, and determining if they are reasonable based on price and spread movements for this asset class.
•
Auction rate securities
– Due to their illiquidity, ARCs are classified as Level 3 investments and are valued through the use of an expected cash flows model prepared by a third-party valuation expert. The assumptions used in preparing the expected cash flows model include estimates for coupon rates, time to maturity and market rates of return. The most significant unobservable input to the expected cash flows model is an assumed return to market liquidity sometime within the next
five
years. If the assumed return to market liquidity was lengthened beyond the next
five
years, this would result in a decrease in the fair value of these ARCs. The Corporation believes that the trusts underlying the ARCs will self-liquidate as student loans are repaid. Level 3 values are tested by management through the performance of a trend analysis of the market price and discount rate. Changes in the price and discount rates are compared to changes in market data, including bond ratings, parity ratios, balances and delinquency levels.
•
Other assets
– Included within this category are the following:
•
Level 1 assets include mutual funds that are held in trust for employee deferred compensation plans (
$16.1 million
at
September 30, 2014
and
$15.3 million
at
December 31, 2013
) and the fair value of foreign currency exchange contracts (
$1.4 million
at
September 30, 2014
and
$522,000
at
December 31, 2013
). The mutual funds and foreign exchange prices used to measure these items at fair value are based on quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.
•
Level 2 assets include the fair value of mortgage banking derivatives in the form of interest rate locks and forward commitments with secondary market investors (
$1.3 million
at
September 30, 2014
and
$2.1 million
at
December 31, 2013
) and the fair value of interest rate swaps (
$10.6 million
at
September 30, 2014
and
$5.1 million
at
December 31, 2013
). The fair values of the Corporation’s interest rate locks, forward commitments and interest rate swaps represent the amounts that would be required to settle the derivative financial instruments at the balance sheet date. See Note I, "Derivative Financial Instruments," for additional information.
•
Other liabilities
– Included within this category are the following:
•
Level 1 liabilities include employee deferred compensation liabilities which represent amounts due to employees under deferred compensation plans (
$16.1 million
at
September 30, 2014
and
$15.3 million
at
December 31, 2013
) and the fair value of foreign currency exchange contracts (
$1.3 million
at
September 30, 2014
and
$391,000
at
December 31, 2013
). The fair value of these liabilities are determined in the same manner as the related assets, as described under the heading "Other assets" above.
•
Level 2 liabilities include the fair value of mortgage banking derivatives in the form of interest rate locks and forward commitments with secondary market investors (
$408,000
at
September 30, 2014
and
$64,000
at
December 31, 2013
) and the fair value of interest rate swaps (
$10.6 million
at
September 30, 2014
and
$5.1 million
at
December 31, 2013
). The fair values of these liabilities are determined in the same manner as the related assets, as described under the heading "Other assets" above.
34
The following table presents the changes in the Corporation’s available for sale investment securities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using unobservable inputs (Level 3):
Three months ended September 30, 2014
Pooled Trust
Preferred
Securities
Single-issuer
Trust Preferred
Securities
ARCs
(in thousands)
Balance at June 30, 2014
$
4,275
$
3,820
$
146,931
Realized adjustment to fair value (1)
(18
)
—
—
Unrealized adjustment to fair value (2)
230
47
1,280
Discount accretion (3)
—
2
262
Balance at September 30, 2014
$
4,487
$
3,869
$
148,473
Three months ended September 30, 2013
Balance at June 30, 2013
$
5,391
$
3,670
$
152,592
Sales
—
—
(25
)
Realized adjustment to fair value (1)
(97
)
—
—
Unrealized adjustment to fair value (2)
(103
)
108
1,983
Settlements - calls
—
—
(317
)
Discount accretion (3)
—
2
277
Balance at September 30, 2013
$
5,191
$
3,780
$
154,510
Nine months ended September 30, 2014
Pooled Trust
Preferred
Securities
Single-issuer
Trust Preferred
Securities
ARCs
(in thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2013
$
5,306
$
3,781
$
159,274
Sales
(1,394
)
—
(11,912
)
Realized adjustment to fair value (1)
(18
)
—
—
Unrealized adjustment to fair value (2)
789
83
1,528
Settlements - calls
(200
)
—
(1,081
)
Discount accretion (3)
4
5
664
Balance at September 30, 2014
$
4,487
$
3,869
$
148,473
Nine months ended September 30, 2013
Balance at December 31, 2012
$
6,927
$
3,360
$
149,339
Sales
(4,987
)
—
(25
)
Realized adjustment to fair value (1)
1,604
—
—
Unrealized adjustment to fair value (2)
1,771
412
7,171
Settlements - calls
(124
)
—
(2,725
)
Discount accretion (3)
—
8
750
Balance at September 30, 2013
$
5,191
$
3,780
$
154,510
(1)
Realized adjustments to fair value represent credit related other-than-temporary impairment charges and gains on sales of investment securities, both included
as components of investment securities gains on the consolidated statements of income.
(2)
Pooled trust preferred securities, single-issuer trust preferred securities and ARCs are classified as available for sale investment securities; as such, the unrealized adjustment to fair value was recorded as an unrealized holding gain (loss) and included as a component of available for sale investment securities on the consolidated balance sheets.
(3)
Included as a component of net interest income on the consolidated statements of income.
35
Certain financial assets are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis, but are subject to fair value measurement in certain circumstances, such as upon their acquisition or when there is evidence of impairment. The following table presents the Corporation’s financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and reported on the Corporation’s consolidated balance sheets:
September 30, 2014
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(in thousands)
Net loans
$
—
$
—
$
128,952
$
128,952
Other financial assets
—
—
55,867
55,867
Total assets
$
—
$
—
$
184,819
$
184,819
December 31, 2013
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(in thousands)
Net loans
$
—
$
—
$
138,666
$
138,666
Other financial assets
—
—
57,504
57,504
Total assets
$
—
$
—
$
196,170
$
196,170
The valuation techniques used to measure fair value for the items in the table above are as follows:
•
Net loans
– This category consists of loans that were evaluated for impairment under FASB ASC Section 310-10-35 and have been classified as Level 3 assets. The amount shown is the balance of impaired loans, net of the related allowance for loan losses. See Note E, "Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses," for additional details.
•
Other financial assets
– This category includes OREO (
$13.5 million
at
September 30, 2014
and
$15.1 million
at
December 31, 2013
) and MSRs (
$42.4 million
at
September 30, 2014
and
$42.5 million
at
December 31, 2013
), both classified as Level 3 assets.
Fair values for OREO were based on estimated selling prices less estimated selling costs for similar assets in active markets.
MSRs are initially recorded at fair value upon the sale of residential mortgage loans to secondary market investors. MSRs are amortized as a reduction to servicing income over the estimated lives of the underlying loans. MSRs are stratified and evaluated for impairment by comparing each stratum's carrying amount to its estimated fair value. Fair values are determined at the end of each quarter through a discounted cash flows valuation performed by a third-party valuation expert. Significant inputs to the valuation included expected net servicing income, the discount rate and the expected life of the underlying loans. Expected life is based on the contractual terms of the loans, as adjusted for prepayment projections. The weighted average annual constant prepayment rate and the weighted average discount rate used in the
September 30, 2014
valuation were
12.0%
and
9.1%
, respectively. Management tests the reasonableness of the significant inputs to the third-party valuation in comparison to market data.
36
As required by FASB ASC Section 825-10-50, the following table details the book values and estimated fair values of the Corporation’s financial instruments as of
September 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
. In addition, a general description of the methods and assumptions used to estimate such fair values is also provided.
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
Book Value
Estimated
Fair Value
Book Value
Estimated
Fair Value
(in thousands)
FINANCIAL ASSETS
Cash and due from banks
$
220,946
$
220,946
$
218,540
$
218,540
Interest-bearing deposits with other banks
291,523
291,523
163,988
163,988
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock
86,056
86,056
84,173
84,173
Loans held for sale (1)
25,212
25,212
21,351
21,351
Available for sale investment securities (1)
2,470,609
2,470,609
2,568,434
2,568,434
Loans, net of unearned income (1)
13,030,405
12,909,164
12,782,220
12,688,774
Accrued interest receivable
43,544
43,544
44,037
44,037
Other financial assets (1)
157,664
157,664
146,933
146,933
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES
Demand and savings deposits
$
10,342,243
$
10,342,243
$
9,573,264
$
9,573,264
Time deposits
2,991,384
2,986,545
2,917,922
2,927,374
Short-term borrowings
564,952
564,952
1,258,629
1,258,629
Accrued interest payable
17,425
17,425
15,218
15,218
Other financial liabilities (1)
147,121
147,121
124,440
124,440
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and long-term debt
1,018,289
1,012,741
883,584
875,984
(1)
These financial instruments, or certain financial instruments within these categories, are measured at fair value on the Corporation’s consolidated balance sheets. Descriptions of the fair value determinations for these financial instruments are disclosed above.
Fair values of financial instruments are significantly affected by the assumptions used, principally the timing of future cash flows and discount rates. Because assumptions are inherently subjective in nature, the estimated fair values cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent market quotes and, in many cases, the estimated fair values could not necessarily be realized in an immediate sale or settlement of the instrument. The aggregate fair value amounts presented do not necessarily represent management’s estimate of the underlying value of the Corporation.
For short-term financial instruments, defined as those with remaining maturities of
90
days or less, and excluding those recorded at fair value on the Corporation’s consolidated balance sheets, book value was considered to be a reasonable estimate of fair value.
The following instruments are predominantly short-term:
Assets
Liabilities
Cash and due from banks
Demand and savings deposits
Interest bearing deposits with other banks
Short-term borrowings
Accrued interest receivable
Accrued interest payable
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock represent restricted investments and are carried at cost on the consolidated balance sheets. Each of the Corporation’s subsidiary banks is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank for the region encompassing the headquarters of the subsidiary bank. Memberships are maintained with the Atlanta, New York and Pittsburgh regional Federal Home Loan Banks (collectively referred to as the "FHLB").
Fair values for loans and time deposits were estimated by discounting future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers and similar deposits would be issued to customers for the same remaining maturities. Fair values estimated in this manner do not fully incorporate an exit price approach to fair value, as defined in FASB ASC Topic 820.
The fair values of FHLB advances and long-term debt were estimated by discounting the remaining contractual cash flows using a rate at which the Corporation could issue debt with similar remaining maturities as of the balance sheet date. These borrowings would be categorized within Level 2 liabilities under FASB ASC Topic 820.
37
NOTE N – Common Stock Repurchase Plans
In
October 2013
, the Corporation announced that its board of directors had approved a share repurchase program pursuant to which the Corporation was authorized to repurchase up to
4.0 million
shares, or approximately
2.1%
of its outstanding shares, through
March 2014
. During the first quarter of 2014, the Corporation repurchased
4.0 million
shares under this repurchase plan at an average cost of
$12.45
per share, completing this repurchase program on February 19, 2014.
In
May 2014
, the Corporation announced that its board of directors had approved a share repurchase program pursuant to which the Corporation was authorized to repurchase up to
4.0 million
shares, or approximately
2.1%
of its outstanding shares, through
December 31, 2014
. During the third quarter of 2014, the Corporation repurchased
4.0 million
shares under this repurchase plan at an average cost of
$11.36
per share, completing this repurchase program on August 25, 2014.
NOTE O - Subsequent Event
Dividend Declaration
On November 5, 2014, the Corporation announced that its Board of Directors declared a special cash dividend of
$0.02
per share on its common stock, which will be paid on December 15, 2014 to shareholders of record as of December 1, 2014.
38
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Management’s Discussion) relates to Fulton Financial Corporation (the Corporation), a financial holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 and incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in 1982, and its wholly owned subsidiaries. Management’s Discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes presented in this report.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The Corporation has made, and may continue to make, certain forward-looking statements with respect to its financial condition and results of operations. Do not unduly rely on forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as "may," "should," "will," "could," "estimates," "predicts," "potential," "continue," "anticipates," "believes," "plans," "expects," "future," "intends" and similar expressions which are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which are beyond the Corporation's control and ability to predict, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. The Corporation undertakes no obligation, other than as required by law, to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Many factors could affect future financial results including, without limitation:
•
the impact of adverse changes in the economy and real estate markets, including protracted periods of low-growth and sluggish loan demand;
•
increases in non-performing assets, which may require the Corporation to increase the allowance for credit losses, charge-off loans and incur elevated collection and carrying costs related to such non-performing assets;
•
the effects of market interest rates, particularly a continuing period of low market interest rates, and relative balances of rate-sensitive assets to rate-sensitive liabilities, on net interest margin and net interest income;
•
capital and liquidity strategies, including the Corporation’s ability to comply with applicable capital and liquidity requirements (including the finalized Basel III capital standards), and the Corporation’s ability to generate capital internally or raise capital on favorable terms;
•
investment securities gains and losses, including other-than-temporary declines in the value of securities which may result in charges to earnings;
•
the impact of non-interest income growth, including the impact of potential regulatory changes;
•
the impact of increased regulatory scrutiny of the banking industry;
•
the effects of the increasing time and expense associated with regulatory compliance and risk management;
•
the additional time, expense and investment required to comply with, and the restrictions on potential growth and investment activities resulting from, the issuance of enforcement orders by federal bank regulatory agencies;
•
the Corporation’s ability to manage the uncertainty and lack of clear regulatory guidance associated with the delay in implementing many of the regulations mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act;
•
the impact of operational risk, i.e. the risk of loss resulting from human error, inadequate or failed internal processes and systems, outsourcing arrangements, compliance and legal risk and external events;
•
the Corporation’s ability to manage the level of non-interest expenses, including salaries and employee benefits expenses, operating risk losses, amortization of intangible assets and goodwill impairment;
•
the Corporation’s ability to keep pace with technological changes and to identify and to address cyber-security risks;
•
the effects of competition on rates of deposit, loan growth and net interest margin; and
•
any damage to the Corporation’s reputation resulting from developments related to any of the items identified above.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview and Summary Financial Results
Fulton Financial Corporation is a financial holding company comprised of six wholly owned banking subsidiaries which provide a full range of retail and commercial financial services in Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey and Virginia. The Corporation generates the majority of its revenue through net interest income, or the difference between interest earned on loans and investments and interest paid on deposits and borrowings. Growth in net interest income is dependent upon balance sheet growth and/or maintaining or increasing the net interest margin, which is net interest income (fully taxable-equivalent, or FTE)
39
as a percentage of average interest-earning assets. The Corporation also generates revenue through fees earned on the various services and products offered to its customers and through gains on sales of assets, such as loans, investments, lines of business or properties. Offsetting these revenue sources are provisions for credit losses on loans, non-interest expenses and income taxes.
The following table presents a summary of the Corporation’s earnings and selected performance ratios:
As of or for the
Three months ended
September 30
As of or for the
Nine months ended
September 30
2014
2013
2014
2013
Income before income taxes (in thousands)
$
51,968
$
53,785
$
161,081
$
158,503
Net income (in thousands)
$
38,566
$
39,948
$
119,945
$
119,757
Diluted net income per share
$
0.21
$
0.21
$
0.64
$
0.61
Return on average assets
0.90
%
0.93
%
0.95
%
0.95
%
Return on average equity
7.32
%
7.81
%
7.72
%
7.79
%
Net interest margin (1)
3.39
%
3.45
%
3.42
%
3.51
%
Non-performing assets to total assets
0.91
%
1.09
%
0.91
%
1.09
%
Annualized net charge-offs to average loans
0.18
%
0.45
%
0.24
%
0.54
%
(1)
Presented on an FTE basis, using a 35% Federal tax rate and statutory interest expense disallowances. See also the “Net Interest Income” section of Management’s Discussion.
Income before income taxes for the
third
quarter of
2014
decreased
$1.8 million
, or
3.4%
, compared to the
third
quarter of
2013
. For the first nine months of
2014
, income before taxes increased
$2.6 million
, or
1.6%
, compared to the same period in
2013
.
The Corporation's results for the three and
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
in comparison to the same periods in
2013
were most significantly impacted by decreases in the provision for credit losses, as a result of improved asset quality, a decline in net interest income, and lower non-interest income, partially offset by decreases in non-interest expense.
Following is a summary of financial highlights for the three and
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
:
Asset Quality
- For the three and
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
, the Corporation's provision for credit losses decreased
$6.0 million
, or
63.2%
, and
$28.5 million
, or
75.0%
, respectively, in comparison to the same periods in
2013
. These decreases were due to an overall improvement in asset quality.
Non-performing loans decreased
$24.4 million
, or
14.5%
, since
September 30, 2013
. The total delinquency rate was
1.69%
as of
September 30, 2014
, compared to
1.97%
as of
September 30, 2013
. Annualized net charge-offs to average loans outstanding were
0.18%
for the
third
quarter of 2014, compared to
0.45%
for the
third
quarter of 2013.
Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin
- For the three and
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
, net interest income decreased
$3.2 million
, or
2.4%
, and
$7.4 million
, or
1.9%
, respectively, in comparison to the same periods in
2013
. Net interest income for the three and
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
was negatively impacted by net interest margin compression as yields on interest-earning assets declined more significantly than the cost of interest-bearing liabilities in comparison to the same periods in 2013. The net interest margin for the
third
quarter of 2014 decreased
6
basis points, or
1.7%
, in comparison to the
third
quarter of
2013
. For the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
, net interest margin decreased
9
basis points, or
2.6%
, in comparison to the same period of
2013
.
Average interest-earning assets decreased
$56.5 million
, or
0.4%
, in the
third
quarter of
2014
in comparison to the same period of
2013
, mainly due to a
$295.6 million
, or
10.7%
, decrease in average investment securities partially offset by a
$194.7 million
, or
1.5%
, increase in average loans. Average interest-earning assets for the first
nine
months of
2014
increased
$110.0 million
, or
0.7%
, compared to the same period in
2013
, primarily as a result of a
$321.2 million
, or
2.6%
, increase in average loans, partially offset by a
$233.1 million
, or
8.5%
, decrease in average investment securities.
Non-interest Income
- For the three and
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
, non-interest income, excluding investment securities gains, decreased
$2.9 million
, or
6.5%
, and
$14.9 million
,
10.7%
, respectively, in comparison to the same periods in
2013
. The decreases in non-interest income were primarily due to decreases in mortgage banking income, with declines in service charges on deposits, particularly overdraft fee income, also contributing to the decreases.
40
Non-interest Expense
- For the three and
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
, non-interest expense decreased
$807,000
, or
0.7%
, and
$3.1 million
, or
0.9%
, respectively, in comparison to the same periods in
2013
. These decreases were primarily driven by decreases in other real estate owned (OREO) and repossession expense, due to improved asset quality, and decreases in operating risk losses, partially offset by increases in other outside services as a result of consulting expense incurred primarily for risk management and regulatory compliance initiatives, as discussed under the heading, "Regulatory Compliance and Risk Management Matters" below.
During the first quarter of
2014
, the Corporation implemented a series of initiatives intended to reduce non-interest expenses by approximately $7 million in 2014 and approximately $8 million on an annualized basis. These initiatives included the consolidation of 13 branches, streamlining of subsidiary bank management structures and other employee compensation and benefit reductions.
The branch consolidations resulted in the transfer of deposits, employees and other branch resources to existing branch locations. During the first quarter of 2014, $2.1 million of expenses, consisting mainly of lease termination costs and the write-off of leasehold improvements, were incurred. Total expense reductions to be realized in 2014 as a result of the branch consolidations are approximately $2.4 million, including $800,000 and $1.6 million, respectively, during the three and
nine months ended September 30,
2014
.
The streamlining of subsidiary bank management structures resulted in the elimination of five subsidiary bank divisional executive positions, while other employee compensation and benefit reductions were realized from changes to certain employee benefits plans, most notably an amendment to the postretirement benefits plan (Postretirement Plan). During the first quarter of 2014, $1.1 million of net implementation gains were recognized from these actions. Total expense reductions to be realized in 2014 as a result of these actions are approximately $4.6 million, including $1.2 million and $3.4 million, respectively, during the three and
nine months ended September 30,
2014
.
Regulatory Compliance and Risk Management Matters
- Virtually every aspect of the Corporation’s operations is subject to extensive regulation, and in recent years, a combination of financial reform legislation and heightened scrutiny by banking regulators has significantly increased expectations regarding what constitutes an effective risk and compliance management infrastructure. Bank regulators are scrutinizing banks through longer and more extensive bank examinations in both the safety and soundness and compliance areas.
To keep pace with these heightened expectations in the compliance area, in 2012 the Corporation began devoting substantial resources to improving its risk management framework and regulatory compliance programs, including those designed to comply with the requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act, the USA Patriot Act of 2001 and related anti-money laundering regulations (collectively, BSA/AML Requirements). The Corporation has made substantial progress in strengthening its risk management and regulatory compliance programs, including the addition of personnel and retention of third-party consultants that specialize in strengthening compliance programs addressing the BSA/AML Requirements. However, the pace of this progress has not been consistent with current regulatory expectations, and continuing deficiencies in compliance program elements related to the BSA/AML Requirements have been identified at the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries, and at the Corporation.
In July 2014, three of the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries, Fulton Bank, N.A., Swineford National Bank and FNB Bank, N.A., each entered into a Stipulation and Consent to the Issuance of a Consent Order (Consent Order) with their primary Federal bank regulatory agency, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, relating to identified deficiencies in a centralized compliance program (BSA/AML Compliance Program) designed to comply with the BSA/AML Requirements, as disclosed by the Corporation in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 18, 2014. The Consent Orders require, among other things, that the banking subsidiaries in question review, assess and take actions to strengthen and enhance the BSA/AML Compliance Program.
In September 2014, the Corporation and its wholly owned banking subsidiary, Lafayette Ambassador Bank (Lafayette), entered into a consent cease and desist order (Cease and Desist Order) with their primary Federal bank regulatory agency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Reserve Board), as disclosed by the Corporation in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 9, 2014. The Cease and Desist Order requires, among other things, that the Corporation and Lafayette strengthen the BSA/AML Compliance Program and imposes requirements similar to those set forth in the Consent Orders. In addition, the Cease and Desist Order requires the Corporation to engage an independent third-party firm to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the BSA/AML Compliance Program, and that Lafayette engage an independent third-party firm to conduct a retrospective review of account and transaction activity from January 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 associated with high-risk customers to determine whether suspicious activity was properly identified and reported in accordance with the BSA/AML requirements. Based on the results of this review the Reserve Board may require a review of transactions for additional time periods. Further, because the Consent Orders and the Cease and Desist Order relate to the BSA/AML Compliance Program, which is operated
41
jointly for all of the Corporation’s subsidiary banks, management anticipates that one or both of the Corporation's other subsidiary banks will also become subject to an enforcement action related to the BSA/AML Requirements, and the provisions of any such enforcement action may differ from those of the Consent Orders and Cease and Desist Order.
In addition to requiring strengthening and enhancement of the BSA/AML Compliance Program, the Consent Orders and the Cease and Desist Order impose certain restrictions on expansion activities of the Corporation and its subsidiary banks. Further, any failure to comply with the requirements of any of these enforcement actions involving the Corporation or its subsidiary banks could result in further enforcement actions, the imposition of material restrictions on the activities of the Corporation or its subsidiary banks, or the assessment of fines or penalties.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 the Corporation incurred approximately $3 million and $6 million, respectively, of outside services expense related to strengthening and enhancing the BSA/AML Compliance Program. Additional expenses and investments may be required as the Corporation further expands its hiring of personnel and use of outside professionals, such as consulting and legal services, and possibly for capital investments in operating systems to strengthen and support the BSA/AML Compliance Program, as well as the Corporation’s broader compliance and risk management infrastructures. The expense and capital investment associated with all of these efforts, including in connection with the Consent Orders and the the Cease and Desist Order could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s results of operations in future periods.
42
Quarter Ended
September 30, 2014
compared to the Quarter Ended
September 30, 2013
Net Interest Income
Fully-taxable equivalent (FTE) net interest income decreased
$3.2 million
to
$133.7 million
in the
third
quarter of
2014
, from
$136.9 million
in the
third
quarter of
2013
. This decrease was primarily due to a
6
basis point, or
1.7%
, decrease in the net interest margin, to
3.39%
for the
third
quarter of
2014
from
3.45%
for the
third
quarter of
2013
. The following table provides a comparative average balance sheet and net interest income analysis for the
third
quarter of
2014
as compared to the same period in
2013
. Interest income and yields are presented on an FTE basis, using a 35% Federal tax rate and statutory interest expense disallowances. The discussion following this table is based on these FTE amounts. All dollar amounts are in thousands.
Three months ended September 30
2014
2013
ASSETS
Average
Balance
Interest (1)
Yield/
Rate
Average
Balance
Interest (1)
Yield/
Rate
Interest-earning assets:
Loans, net of unearned income (2)
$
12,922,821
$
136,773
4.20
%
$
12,728,162
$
139,141
4.34
%
Taxable investment securities (3)
2,181,099
12,278
2.25
2,446,583
12,977
2.12
Tax-exempt investment securities (3)
256,303
3,414
5.33
284,372
3,581
5.04
Equity securities (3)
34,002
438
5.12
35,999
435
4.82
Total investment securities
2,471,404
16,130
2.61
2,766,954
16,993
2.46
Loans held for sale
23,699
237
4.01
36,450
382
4.19
Other interest-earning assets
293,286
976
1.33
236,185
659
1.12
Total interest-earning assets
15,711,210
154,116
3.90
%
15,767,751
157,175
3.96
%
Noninterest-earning assets:
Cash and due from banks
203,134
210,525
Premises and equipment
224,241
224,837
Other assets
1,055,521
1,009,162
Less: Allowance for loan losses
(192,163
)
(220,342
)
Total Assets
$
17,001,943
$
16,991,933
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits
$
3,047,191
$
953
0.12
%
$
2,895,156
$
938
0.13
%
Savings deposits
3,468,958
1,061
0.12
3,359,795
1,015
0.12
Time deposits
3,009,225
6,984
0.92
3,065,210
6,790
0.88
Total interest-bearing deposits
9,525,374
8,998
0.37
9,320,161
8,743
0.37
Short-term borrowings
667,397
297
0.18
1,337,742
691
0.20
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and long-term debt
995,486
11,129
4.45
889,141
10,865
4.87
Total interest-bearing liabilities
11,188,257
20,424
0.73
%
11,547,044
20,299
0.70
%
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits
3,514,033
3,221,648
Other
210,194
194,163
Total Liabilities
14,912,484
14,962,855
Shareholders’ equity
2,089,459
2,029,078
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
$
17,001,943
$
16,991,933
Net interest income/net interest margin (FTE)
133,692
3.39
%
136,876
3.45
%
Tax equivalent adjustment
(4,326
)
(4,343
)
Net interest income
$
129,366
$
132,533
(1)
Includes dividends earned on equity securities.
(2)
Includes non-performing loans.
(3)
Balances include amortized historical cost for available for sale securities; the related unrealized holding gains (losses) are included in other assets.
43
The following table summarizes the changes in FTE interest income and interest expense resulting from changes in average balances (volume) and changes in rates for the three months ended
September 30
:
2014 vs. 2013
Increase (Decrease) due
to change in
Volume
Rate
Net
(in thousands)
Interest income on:
Loans, net of unearned income
$
2,127
$
(4,495
)
$
(2,368
)
Taxable investment securities
(1,471
)
772
(699
)
Tax-exempt investment securities
(368
)
201
(167
)
Equity securities
(24
)
27
3
Loans held for sale
(129
)
(16
)
(145
)
Other interest-earning assets
178
139
317
Total interest income
$
313
$
(3,372
)
$
(3,059
)
Interest expense on:
Demand deposits
$
65
$
(50
)
$
15
Savings deposits
46
—
46
Time deposits
(121
)
315
194
Short-term borrowings
(329
)
(65
)
(394
)
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and long-term debt
1,245
(981
)
264
Total interest expense
$
906
$
(781
)
$
125
Note: Changes which are partially attributable to both volume and rate are allocated to the volume and rate components presented above based on the percentage of direct changes that are attributable to each component.
As summarized above, a
6
basis point, or
1.5%
, decrease in yields on average interest-earnings assets resulted in a
$3.4 million
decrease in FTE interest income, partially offset by a
$313,000
increase in FTE interest income as a result of a shift in the mix of average interest-earning assets.
Average investments decreased
$295.6 million
, or
10.7%
, as portfolio cash flows were not fully reinvested. The yield on average investments increased
15
basis points, or
6.1%
, to
2.61%
in the
third
quarter of 2014 from
2.46%
in the
third
quarter of 2013. A $1.2 million, or 41.5%, decrease in net premium amortization on mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations had a 14 basis point positive impact on the overall change in portfolio yield.
Average loans and average FTE yields, by type, are summarized in the following table:
Three months ended September 30
Increase (Decrease) in
2014
2013
Balance
Balance
Yield
Balance
Yield
$
%
(dollars in thousands)
Real estate – commercial mortgage
$
5,114,221
4.35
%
$
4,961,871
4.57
%
$
152,350
3.1
%
Commercial – industrial, financial and agricultural
3,657,047
3.97
3,706,113
4.04
(49,066
)
(1.3
)
Real estate – home equity
1,727,253
4.18
1,767,095
4.19
(39,842
)
(2.3
)
Real estate – residential mortgage
1,369,087
3.93
1,323,972
4.15
45,115
3.4
Real estate – construction
663,922
3.98
576,222
4.10
87,700
15.2
Consumer
284,630
5.39
299,057
4.76
(14,427
)
(4.8
)
Leasing and other
106,661
7.16
93,832
9.42
12,829
13.7
Total
$
12,922,821
4.20
%
$
12,728,162
4.34
%
$
194,659
1.5
%
Average loans increased
$194.7 million
, or
1.5%
, compared to the
third
quarter of
2013
, mainly in commercial mortgages, real estate - construction and residential mortgages. The growth in commercial mortgages was driven by a combination of loans to new customers and increased borrowings from existing customers. The average yield on loans decreased
14
basis points, or
3.2%
, to
4.20%
in
2014
from
4.34%
in
2013
. The decrease in average yields on loans was primarily in commercial mortgages and was
44
attributable to repayments of higher-yielding loans and new loan production at lower rates and elimination of interest rate floors on certain loans.
Average other interest-earning assets increased
$57.1 million
, or
24.2%
, primarily due to an increase in average interest-bearing deposits with other banks. The average yield on other interest-earning assets increased
21
basis points, or
18.8%
, due to increases in dividends on Federal Home Loan Bank stock. Each of the Corporation’s subsidiary banks is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank for the region encompassing the headquarters of the subsidiary bank. Memberships are maintained with the Atlanta, New York and Pittsburgh regional Federal Home Loan Banks (collectively referred to as the "FHLB"). As of
September 30, 2014
, the Corporation held $66.8 million of FHLB stock.
Interest expense increased
$125,000
, or
0.6%
, to
$20.4 million
in the
third
quarter of
2014
from
$20.3 million
in the
third
quarter of
2013
. Although average interest-bearing liabilities decreased
$358.8 million
, or
3.1%
, compared to the
third
quarter of
2013
, a change in funding mix from lower cost short-term federal funds and short-term FHLB advances to higher rate interest bearing non-maturity deposits and higher-cost long-term FHLB advances resulted in a
$906,000
increase in interest expense.
Average deposits and average interest rates, by type, are summarized in the following table:
Three months ended September 30
Increase (Decrease) in
2014
2013
Balance
Balance
Rate
Balance
Rate
$
%
(dollars in thousands)
Noninterest-bearing demand
$
3,514,033
—
%
$
3,221,648
—
%
$
292,385
9.1
%
Interest-bearing demand
3,047,191
0.12
2,895,156
0.13
152,035
5.3
Savings
3,468,958
0.12
3,359,795
0.12
109,163
3.2
Total demand and savings
10,030,182
0.08
9,476,599
0.08
553,583
5.8
Time deposits
3,009,225
0.92
3,065,210
0.88
(55,985
)
(1.8
)
Total deposits
$
13,039,407
0.27
%
$
12,541,809
0.28
%
$
497,598
4.0
%
The
$553.6 million
, or
5.8%
, increase in total demand and savings accounts was primarily due to a $251.5 million, or 7.6%, increase in business account balances, a $190.1 million, or 4.3%, increase in personal account balances and a $129.4 million, or 7.8% increase in municipal account balances. The average cost of total deposits decreased one basis point due to a higher concentration in demand and savings accounts, partially offset by an increase in rates on average time deposits.
Average borrowings and interest rates, by type, are summarized in the following table:
Three months ended September 30
Increase (Decrease) in
2014
2013
Balance
Balance
Rate
Balance
Rate
$
%
(dollars in thousands)
Short-term borrowings:
Customer repurchase agreements
$
202,809
0.11
%
$
196,503
0.11
%
$
6,306
3.2
%
Customer short-term promissory notes
83,734
0.05
91,573
0.06
(7,839
)
(8.6
)
Total short-term customer funding
286,543
0.09
288,076
0.09
(1,533
)
(0.5
)
Federal funds purchased
224,930
0.19
559,992
0.23
(335,062
)
(59.8
)
Short-term FHLB advances (1)
155,924
0.32
489,674
0.23
(333,750
)
(68.2
)
Total short-term borrowings
667,397
0.18
1,337,742
0.20
(670,345
)
(50.1
)
Long-term debt:
FHLB advances
625,712
3.60
519,520
4.14
106,192
20.4
Other long-term debt
369,774
5.89
369,621
5.89
153
—
Total long-term debt
995,486
4.45
889,141
4.87
106,345
12.0
Total borrowings
$
1,662,883
2.74
%
$
2,226,883
2.07
%
$
(564,000
)
(25.3
)%
(1) Represents FHLB advances with an original maturity term of less than one year.
Total short-term borrowings decreased
$670.3 million
, or
50.1%
, primarily in federal funds purchased and short-term FHLB advances. The decrease was driven by lower wholesale funding needs resulting from the decrease in average investment securities and an increase in average deposits exceeding the growth in average loans.
45
The average cost of total borrowings increased
67
basis points, or
32.4%
, to
2.74%
in
2014
from
2.07%
in
2013
, primarily due to the weighted average cost impact of a decrease in lower-cost, short-term borrowings, which were
40.1%
of total borrowings in
2014
and
60.1%
in
2013
. This reflects the Corporation's continuing efforts to lengthen maturities and lock in longer term rates.
Provision for Credit Losses
The provision for credit losses was
$3.5 million
for the
third
quarter of
2014
, a decrease of
$6.0 million
, or
63.2%
, from the
third
quarter of
2013
due to improvements in asset quality, as shown by reductions in non-performing loans and overall delinquency rates.
The provision for credit losses is recognized as an expense in the consolidated statements of income and is the amount necessary to adjust the allowance for credit losses to its appropriate balance, as determined through the Corporation's allowance methodology. The Corporation determines the appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses based on many quantitative and qualitative factors, including, but not limited to: the size and composition of the loan portfolio, changes in risk ratings, changes in collateral values, delinquency levels, historical losses and economic conditions. See the "Financial Condition" section of Management's Discussion under the heading "Provision for Credit Losses and Allowance for Credit Losses" for details related to the Corporation's allowance and provision for credit losses.
Non-Interest Income
The following table presents the components of non-interest income:
Three months ended September 30
Increase (Decrease)
2014
2013
$
%
(dollars in thousands)
Service charges on deposit accounts:
Overdraft fees
$
5,806
$
7,191
$
(1,385
)
(19.3
)%
Cash management fees
3,191
3,001
190
6.3
Other
3,804
3,746
58
1.5
Total service charges on deposit accounts
12,801
13,938
(1,137
)
(8.2
)
Investment management and trust services
11,120
10,420
700
6.7
Other service charges and fees:
Merchant fees
3,774
3,396
378
11.1
Debit card income
2,407
2,394
13
0.5
Letter of credit fees
1,163
1,255
(92
)
(7.3
)
Commercial swap fees
537
447
90
20.1
Other
2,073
2,026
47
2.3
Total other service charges and fees
9,954
9,518
436
4.6
Mortgage banking income:
Gain on sales of mortgage loans
2,613
4,457
(1,844
)
(41.4
)
Mortgage servicing income
1,425
2,666
(1,241
)
(46.5
)
Total mortgage banking income
4,038
7,123
(3,085
)
(43.3
)
Credit card income
2,331
2,229
102
4.6
Other income
1,575
1,496
79
5.3
Total, excluding investment securities gains
41,819
44,724
(2,905
)
(6.5
)
Investment securities gains
81
2,633
(2,552
)
(96.9
)
Total
$
41,900
$
47,357
$
(5,457
)
(11.5
)%
The
$1.4 million
, or
19.3%
, decrease in overdraft fee income consisted of a $974,000 decrease in fees assessed on personal accounts and a $411,000 decrease in fees assessed on commercial accounts. The overall decline in these fees resulted from a reduction in the number of overdrafts, partially driven by changes in customer behavior and a reduction in the maximum number of overdraft fees that may be assessed each day.
The
$700,000
, or
6.7%
, increase in investment management and trust services income was due to a $350,000, or 7.7%, increase in brokerage revenue and a $350,000, or 6.0%, increase in trust commissions. These increases resulted from new trust business
46
sales, improved market conditions that increased the values of existing assets under management and additional recurring revenue generated through the brokerage business due to growth in new accounts.
Gains on sales of mortgage loans decreased
$1.8 million
, or
41.4%
, due to a $94.4 million, or 32.4%, decrease in new loan commitments and a 13.3% decrease in pricing spreads compared to the
third
quarter of
2013
. The decline in new loan commitments was mainly in refinancing volumes, which totaled approximately $56.4 million, or 28.6%, of new loan commitments, in the
third
quarter of
2014
compared to $93.6 million, or 32.1%, during the
third
quarter of
2013
. Mortgage servicing income decreased
$1.2 million
, or
46.5%
, due to the absence of a $1.7 million reversal of the mortgage servicing rights valuation allowance, which occurred in the third quarter of 2013.
Merchant fees increased $377,000, or 11.1%, due to an increase in volumes. Investment securities gains for the
third
quarter of
2014
were a result of net realized gains on sales of financial institution stocks, partially offset by $18,000 of other-than-temporary impairment charges on pooled trust preferred securities. Investment securities gains of $2.6 million for the third quarter of 2013 included $2.1 million of realized gains on financial institution stocks and $595,000 of net realized gains on the sales of debt securities, partially offset by $97,000 of other-than temporary impairment charges on pooled trust preferred debt securities.
See Note D, "Investment Securities," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
Non-Interest Expense
The following table presents the components of non-interest expense:
Three months ended September 30
Increase (Decrease)
2014
2013
$
%
(dollars in thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits
$
62,434
$
63,344
$
(910
)
(1.4
)%
Net occupancy expense
11,582
11,519
63
0.5
Other outside services
8,632
5,048
3,584
71.0
Data processing
4,689
4,757
(68
)
(1.4
)
Software
3,353
3,268
85
2.6
Equipment expense
3,307
3,646
(339
)
(9.3
)
Professional fees
3,252
3,329
(77
)
(2.3
)
FDIC insurance expense
2,882
2,918
(36
)
(1.2
)
Marketing
1,798
2,251
(453
)
(20.1
)
Telecommunications
1,587
2,046
(459
)
(22.4
)
Postage
1,415
1,163
252
21.7
Other real estate owned and repossession expense
1,303
1,453
(150
)
(10.3
)
Operating risk loss
1,242
3,297
(2,055
)
(62.3
)
Supplies
1,145
1,504
(359
)
(23.9
)
Intangible amortization
314
534
(220
)
(41.2
)
Other
6,863
6,528
335
5.1
Total
$
115,798
$
116,605
$
(807
)
(0.7
)%
Salaries and employee benefits decreased
$910,000
, or
1.4%
, as a result of a $601,000, or 1.2%, increase in salaries offset by a $1.5 million, or 13.9%, decrease in employee benefits. The increase in salaries was mostly due to normal merit increases, partially offset by lower salaries expense resulting from the 2014 cost savings initiatives. The decrease in employee benefits was primarily a result of the Corporation's cost savings initiatives, which included the elimination and reduction of certain employee benefit plans, most notably a decrease in profit sharing contributions and an amendment to the Postretirement Plan. For additional information related to the amendment to the Postretirement Plan, see Note H, "Employee Benefit Plans" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Other outside services increased
$3.6 million
, or
71.0%
, due to an increase in consulting services related to the acceleration of risk management and compliance efforts, including those in connection with the enhancement of the Corporation’s program for compliance with the BSA/AML Requirements. The
$2.1 million
, or
62.3%
, decrease in operating risk loss was due to a $2.0 million decrease in losses associated with previously sold residential mortgages.
47
Income Taxes
Income tax expense for the
third
quarter of
2014
was
$13.4 million
, a
$435,000
, or
3.1%
, decrease from
$13.8 million
for the
third
quarter of
2013
.
The Corporation’s effective tax rate was 25.8% in the
third
quarter of
2014
, as compared to 25.7% in the
third
quarter of
2013
.
The effective rate is generally lower than the Federal statutory rate of 35% due to investments in tax-free municipal securities and credits earned from investments in partnerships that generate tax credits under various federal programs.
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2014
compared to the
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2013
Net Interest Income
FTE net interest income decreased
$7.5 million
, or
1.8%
, to
$399.7 million
in the first nine months of
2014
from
$407.2 million
in the same period of
2013
.
Net interest margin decreased
9
basis points, or
2.6%
, to
3.42%
for the first nine months of
2014
from
3.51%
for the first nine months of
2013
. The decrease in net interest margin was the result of a
12
basis point, or
3.0%
, decrease in yields on interest-earning assets, partially offset by a
3
basis point, or
4.1%
, decrease in funding costs.
48
The following table provides a comparative average balance sheet and net interest income analysis for the first nine months of
2014
as compared to the same period in
2013
. Interest income and yields are presented on an FTE basis, using a 35% Federal tax rate and statutory interest expense disallowances. The discussion following this table is based on these FTE amounts. All dollar amounts are in thousands.
Nine months ended September 30
2014
2013
ASSETS
Average
Balance
Interest (1)
Yield/
Rate
Average
Balance
Interest (1)
Yield/
Rate
Interest-earning assets:
Loans, net of unearned income (2)
$
12,827,563
$
405,904
4.23
%
$
12,506,393
$
414,091
4.43
%
Taxable investment securities (3)
2,216,344
37,962
2.28
2,426,015
40,890
2.25
Tax-exempt investment securities (3)
268,604
10,561
5.24
285,638
11,003
5.14
Equity securities (3)
33,949
1,286
5.06
40,352
1,416
4.69
Total investment securities
2,518,897
49,809
2.64
2,752,005
53,309
2.58
Loans held for sale
18,259
585
4.27
42,122
1,261
3.99
Other interest-earning assets
263,797
3,065
1.55
217,975
1,527
0.93
Total interest-earning assets
15,628,516
459,363
3.93
%
15,518,495
470,188
4.05
%
Noninterest-earning assets:
Cash and due from banks
200,368
206,403
Premises and equipment
225,033
225,733
Other assets
1,041,834
1,047,122
Less: Allowance for loan losses
(197,235
)
(223,220
)
Total Assets
$
16,898,516
$
16,774,533
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits
$
2,969,470
$
2,766
0.12
%
$
2,773,917
$
2,687
0.13
%
Savings deposits
3,392,681
3,127
0.12
3,348,413
3,054
0.12
Time deposits
2,984,861
19,686
0.88
3,184,281
22,901
0.96
Total interest-bearing deposits
9,347,012
25,579
0.37
9,306,611
28,642
0.41
Short-term borrowings
972,694
1,470
0.20
1,228,882
1,900
0.20
FHLB advances and long-term debt
924,920
32,606
4.71
889,826
32,448
4.87
Total interest-bearing liabilities
11,244,626
59,655
0.71
%
11,425,319
62,990
0.74
%
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits
3,360,876
3,103,381
Other
214,826
190,976
Total Liabilities
14,820,328
14,719,676
Shareholders’ equity
2,078,188
2,054,857
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
$
16,898,516
$
16,774,533
Net interest income/net interest margin (FTE)
399,708
3.42
%
407,198
3.51
%
Tax equivalent adjustment
(12,879
)
(12,956
)
Net interest income
$
386,829
$
394,242
(1)
Includes dividends earned on equity securities.
(2)
Includes non-performing loans.
(3)
Balances include amortized historical cost for available for sale securities. The related unrealized holding gains (losses) are included in other assets.
49
The following table summarizes the changes in FTE interest income and expense for the first
nine
months of
2014
as compared to the same period in
2013
due to changes in average balances (volume) and changes in rates:
2014 vs. 2013
Increase (Decrease) due
to change in
Volume
Rate
Net
(in thousands)
Interest income on:
Loans, net of unearned income
$
10,461
$
(18,648
)
$
(8,187
)
Taxable investment securities
(3,425
)
497
(2,928
)
Tax-exempt investment securities
(650
)
208
(442
)
Equity securities
(237
)
107
(130
)
Loans held for sale
(759
)
83
(676
)
Other interest-earning assets
365
1,173
1,538
Total interest income
$
5,755
$
(16,580
)
$
(10,825
)
Interest expense on:
Demand deposits
$
184
$
(105
)
$
79
Savings deposits
41
32
73
Time deposits
(1,383
)
(1,832
)
(3,215
)
Short-term borrowings
(467
)
37
(430
)
FHLB advances and long-term debt
1,218
(1,060
)
158
Total interest expense
$
(407
)
$
(2,928
)
$
(3,335
)
Note: Changes which are partially attributable to both volume and rate are allocated to the volume and rate components presented above based on the percentage of direct changes that are attributable to each component.
A
12
basis point, or
3.0%
, decrease in yields on average interest-earning assets resulted in a
$16.6 million
decrease in FTE interest income, which was partially offset by a
$5.8 million
increase in FTE interest income resulting from a
$110.0 million
, or
0.7%
, increase in average interest-earning assets. Average investments decreased
$233.1 million
, or
8.5%
, as portfolio cash flows were not fully reinvested.
The yield on average investments increased
6
basis points, or
2.3%
, to
2.64%
in
2014
from
2.58%
in
2013
.
A $5.4 million, or 52.1%, decrease in net premium amortization on mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations had a 13 basis point positive impact on the overall change in portfolio yield. This positive impact was partially offset by the impact of purchases of mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations at yields that were lower than the overall portfolio yield.
Average loans, by type, are summarized in the following table:
Nine months ended September 30
Increase (Decrease) in
2014
2013
Balance
Balance
Yield
Balance
Yield
$
%
(dollars in thousands)
Real estate – commercial mortgage
$
5,112,735
4.38
%
$
4,796,557
4.71
%
$
316,178
6.6
%
Commercial – industrial, financial and agricultural
3,637,440
3.98
3,694,612
4.14
(57,172
)
(1.5
)
Real estate – home equity
1,739,352
4.18
1,721,041
4.24
18,311
1.1
Real estate – residential mortgage
1,348,269
3.96
1,305,434
4.17
42,835
3.3
Real estate – construction
609,803
4.08
594,991
4.10
14,812
2.5
Consumer
278,697
4.93
303,127
4.88
(24,430
)
(8.1
)
Leasing and other
101,267
8.54
90,631
8.99
10,636
11.7
Total
$
12,827,563
4.23
%
$
12,506,393
4.43
%
$
321,170
2.6
%
50
The
$316.2 million
, or
6.6%
, increase in commercial mortgages was from both new and existing customers. The average yield on loans decreased
20
basis points, or
4.5%
, to
4.23%
in
2014
from
4.43%
in
2013
. The decrease in average yields on loans was attributable to repayments of higher-yielding loans and new loan production at lower rates and elimination of interest rate floors on certain loans.
Interest expense decreased
$3.3 million
, or
5.3%
, to
$59.7 million
in the first nine months of
2014
from
$63.0 million
in the first nine months of
2013
. Interest expense decreased
$2.9 million
as a result of a
3
basis point, or
4.1%
, decrease in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities, primarily a result of a decrease in average costs of time deposits. A
$180.7 million
, or
1.6%
, decrease in average interest-bearing liabilities resulted in an additional
$407,000
decrease in interest expense.
Average deposits, by type, are summarized in the following table:
Nine months ended September 30
Increase (Decrease) in
2014
2013
Balance
Balance
Rate
Balance
Rate
$
%
(dollars in thousands)
Noninterest-bearing demand
$
3,360,876
—
%
$
3,103,381
—
%
$
257,495
8.3
%
Interest-bearing demand
2,969,470
0.12
2,773,917
0.13
195,553
7.0
Savings
3,392,681
0.12
3,348,413
0.12
44,268
1.3
Total demand and savings
9,723,027
0.08
9,225,711
0.08
497,316
5.4
Time deposits
2,984,861
0.88
3,184,281
0.96
(199,420
)
(6.3
)
Total deposits
$
12,707,888
0.27
%
$
12,409,992
0.31
%
$
297,896
2.4
%
The
$497.3 million
, or
5.4%
, increase in total demand and savings account balances was primarily due to a $233.4 million, or 7.5%, increase in business account balances, a $207.0 million, or 4.7%, increase in personal account balances and a $74.3 million, or 4.5%, increase in municipal account balances. The
$199.4 million
, or
6.3%
, decrease in average time deposits was in accounts with balances less than $100,000 with original maturity terms of less than three years, partially offset by increases in accounts with balances of $100,000 or more and accounts with original maturity terms longer than 3 years.
The average cost of deposits decreased
4
basis points, or 12.9%, to 0.27% in
2014
from 0.31% in
2013
, primarily
due to a decrease in higher-cost time deposits and an increase in non-interest bearing deposits and lower-cost interest-bearing savings and demand balances.
The following table summarizes changes in average short-term borrowings and long-term debt, by type:
Nine months ended September 30
Increase (Decrease) in
2014
2013
Balance
Balance
Rate
Balance
Rate
$
%
(dollars in thousands)
Short-term borrowings:
Customer repurchase agreements
$
202,184
0.11
%
$
183,432
0.11
%
$
18,752
10.2
%
Customer short-term promissory notes
89,119
0.05
100,532
0.05
(11,413
)
(11.4
)
Total short-term customer funding
291,303
0.09
283,964
0.09
7,339
2.6
Federal funds purchased
361,162
0.21
681,576
0.24
(320,414
)
(47.0
)
Short-term FHLB advances (1)
320,229
0.29
263,342
0.23
56,887
21.6
Total short-term borrowings
972,694
0.20
1,228,882
0.20
(256,188
)
(20.8
)
Long-term debt:
FHLB advances
555,172
3.92
520,278
4.14
34,894
6.7
Other long-term debt
369,748
5.90
369,548
5.90
200
0.1
Total long-term debt
924,920
4.71
889,826
4.87
35,094
3.9
Total
$
1,897,614
2.40
%
$
2,118,708
2.16
%
$
(221,094
)
(10.4
)%
(1) Represents FHLB advances with an original maturity term of less than one year.
Total short-term borrowings decreased
$256.2 million
, or
20.8%
, primarily in federal funds purchased, partially offset by an increase in short-term FHLB advances. Total borrowings decreased
$221.1 million
, or
10.4%
. The cost of borrowings increased
51
24 basis points, or 11.1%, as a result of lower-cost, short-term borrowings comprising a smaller percentage of total borrowings in an effort to extend maturities and lock in longer term rates.
Provision for Credit Losses
The provision for credit losses was
$9.5 million
for the first
nine months
of
2014
, a decrease of
$28.5 million
, or
75.0%
, in comparison to the first
nine months
of
2013
, reflecting improvements in asset quality. For details related to the Corporation's allowance and provision for credit losses, see the "Financial Condition" section of Management's Discussion under the heading "Provision for Credit Losses and Allowance for Credit Losses."
Non-Interest Income
The following table presents the components of non-interest income:
Nine months ended September 30
Increase (Decrease)
2014
2013
$
%
(dollars in thousands)
Service charges on deposit accounts:
Overdraft fees
$
16,645
$
22,276
$
(5,631
)
(25.3
)%
Cash management fees
9,589
8,803
786
8.9
Other
10,830
11,621
(791
)
(6.8
)
Total service charges on deposit accounts
37,064
42,700
(5,636
)
(13.2
)
Investment management and trust services
33,417
31,117
2,300
7.4
Other service charges and fees:
Merchant fees
10,340
10,070
270
2.7
Debit card income
7,052
6,852
200
2.9
Letter of credit fees
3,448
3,721
(273
)
(7.3
)
Commercial swap fees
2,544
986
1,558
158.0
Other
6,023
5,907
116
2.0
Total other service charges and fees
29,407
27,536
1,871
6.8
Mortgage banking income:
Gain on sales of mortgage loans
8,009
21,472
(13,463
)
(62.7
)
Mortgage servicing income
5,375
4,821
554
11.5
Total mortgage banking income
13,384
26,293
(12,909
)
(49.1
)
Credit card income
6,855
6,535
320
4.9
Other income
3,958
4,780
(822
)
(17.2
)
Total, excluding investment securities gains
124,085
138,961
(14,876
)
(10.7
)
Investment securities gains
1,193
7,971
(6,778
)
(85.0
)
Total
$
125,278
$
146,932
$
(21,654
)
(14.7
)%
The
$5.6 million
, or
25.3%
, decrease in overdraft fee income consisted of a $3.6 million decrease in fees assessed on personal accounts and a $2.0 million decrease in fees assessed on commercial accounts. The overall decline in these fees resulted from a reduction in the number of overdrafts.
The
$2.3 million
, or
7.4%
, increase in investment management and trust services income was primarily due to a $1.6 million, or 11.7%, increase in brokerage revenue and a $731,000, or 4.1%, increase in trust commissions. These increases resulted from new trust business sales, improved market conditions that increased the values of existing assets under management, and additional recurring revenue generated through the brokerage business due to growth in new accounts.
Commercial swap fees increased
$1.6 million
, or
158.0%
, due to the favorable interest rate environment for this product and the Corporation's introduction of this product by all of the Corporation's banking subsidiaries. For additional details see Note I, "Derivative Financial Instruments" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
52
Gains on sales of mortgage loans decreased
$13.5 million
, or
62.7%
, due to a $648.0 million, or 50.0%, decrease in new loan commitments and a 25.4% decrease in pricing spreads compared to the prior year. Both decreases resulted primarily from an increase in mortgage interest rates in the second half of 2013. The decline in new loan commitments was mainly in refinancing volumes, which were $186.5 million, or 28.8%, of new loan commitments in 2014 compared to $652.2 million, or 50.3%, during 2013.
Investment securities gains of
$1.2 million
for the first
nine months
of
2014
were a result of $1.1 million of net realized gains on the sales of debt securities and $100,000 of net realized gains on the sales of financial institution stocks.
The
$8.0 million
of investment securities gains for first nine months of 2013 included $4.3 million of net realized gains on financial institution stocks and $3.8 million of realized gains on the sales of debt securities, partially offset by $124,000 of other-than-temporary impairment charges for certain financial institution stocks and pooled trust preferred debt securities.
Non-Interest Expense
The following table presents the components of non-interest expense:
Nine months ended September 30
Increase (Decrease)
2014
2013
$
%
(dollars in thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits
$
185,623
$
188,046
$
(2,423
)
(1.3
)%
Net occupancy expense
36,649
34,810
1,839
5.3
Other outside services
19,684
13,223
6,461
48.9
Data processing
12,816
13,169
(353
)
(2.7
)
Equipment expense
10,269
11,447
(1,178
)
(10.3
)
Professional fees
9,715
9,771
(56
)
(0.6
)
Software
9,487
9,110
377
4.1
FDIC insurance expense
8,186
8,766
(580
)
(6.6
)
Marketing
5,719
6,045
(326
)
(5.4
)
Telecommunications
5,193
5,586
(393
)
(7.0
)
Postage
4,014
3,633
381
10.5
Operating risk loss
3,786
6,923
(3,137
)
(45.3
)
Supplies
3,323
4,096
(773
)
(18.9
)
Other real estate owned and repossession expense
3,034
6,248
(3,214
)
(51.4
)
Intangible amortization
944
1,603
(659
)
(41.1
)
Other
23,084
22,195
889
4.0
Total
$
341,526
$
344,671
$
(3,145
)
(0.9
)%
Salaries and employee benefits decreased
$2.4 million
, or
1.3%
, with salaries increasing $953,000, or 0.6%, and employee benefits decreasing $3.4 million, or 10.5%. The decrease in employee benefits was primarily due to the cost savings initiatives, which included the elimination and reduction of certain employee benefit plans, most notably a decrease in profit sharing contributions and an amendment to the Postretirement Plan, partially offset by an increase in healthcare expenses and severance.
The
$1.8 million
, or
5.3%
, increase in net occupancy expense was primarily due to an increase in snow removal costs in 2014, partially offset by savings from the branch consolidations. Other outside services increased
$6.5 million
, or
48.9%
, due to an increase in consulting services related to the Corporation’s acceleration of risk management and compliance efforts, including those in connection with the enhancement of the Corporation's program for compliance with the BSA/AML requirements. The
$1.2 million
, or
10.3%
, decrease in equipment expense was primarily due to a decrease in depreciation expense as certain assets became fully depreciated.
The
$3.1 million
, or
45.3%
, decrease in operating risk loss was due to a $3.7 million decrease in losses associated with previously sold residential mortgages, partially offset by a net decrease in debit card and check fraud losses. See Note L "Commitments and Contingencies," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details related to repurchases of previously sold residential mortgages.
53
OREO and repossession expense decreased
$3.2 million
, or
51.4%
, primarily due to an increase in net gains on sales of properties and a decrease in valuation provisions, which reflect the continued improvement in overall asset quality. The
$659,000
, or
41.1%
, decrease in intangible amortization was primarily due to core deposit intangible assets, which are amortized on an accelerated basis.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense for the first
nine
months of
2014
was
$41.1 million
, a
$2.4 million
, or
6.2%
, increase from
$38.7 million
in 2013.
The Corporation’s effective tax rate was 25.5% in
2014
, as compared to 24.4% in
2013
. The effective rate is generally lower than the Federal statutory rate of 35% due to investments in tax-free municipal securities, tax credits earned from investments in partnerships that generate such credits under various federal programs and the effect of state income taxes. The increase in the effective tax rate in comparison to the first
nine
months of
2013
was due primarily to a $2.1 million ($1.4 million, net of federal tax) decrease in the valuation allowance for certain state deferred tax assets that was recorded as a credit to income tax expense in 2013.
54
FINANCIAL CONDITION
The table below presents condensed consolidated ending balance sheets for the Corporation.
Increase (Decrease)
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
$
%
(dollars in thousands)
Assets
Cash and due from banks
$
220,946
$
218,540
$
2,406
1.1
%
Other interest-earning assets
377,579
248,161
129,418
52.2
Loans held for sale
25,212
21,351
3,861
18.1
Investment securities
2,470,609
2,568,434
(97,825
)
(3.8
)
Loans, net of allowance
12,840,928
12,579,440
261,488
2.1
Premises and equipment
224,441
226,021
(1,580
)
(0.7
)
Goodwill and intangible assets
532,117
533,076
(959
)
(0.2
)
Other assets
546,342
539,611
6,731
1.2
Total Assets
$
17,238,174
$
16,934,634
$
303,540
1.8
%
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Deposits
$
13,333,627
$
12,491,186
$
842,441
6.7
%
Short-term borrowings
564,952
1,258,629
(693,677
)
(55.1
)
Long-term debt
1,018,289
883,584
134,705
15.2
Other liabilities
243,300
238,048
5,252
2.2
Total Liabilities
15,160,168
14,871,447
288,721
1.9
Total Shareholders’ Equity
2,078,006
2,063,187
14,819
0.7
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
$
17,238,174
$
16,934,634
$
303,540
1.8
%
Other interest-earning assets
The
$129.4 million
, or
52.2%
, increase in other interest-earning assets was due to an increase in interest-bearing deposits with other banks.
Investment Securities
The following table presents the carrying amount of investment securities:
Increase (Decrease)
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
$
%
(dollars in thousands)
U.S. Government securities
$
200
$
525
$
(325
)
(61.9
)%
U.S. Government sponsored agency securities
240
726
(486
)
(66.9
)
State and municipal securities
257,616
284,849
(27,233
)
(9.6
)
Corporate debt securities
101,427
98,749
2,678
2.7
Collateralized mortgage obligations
955,040
1,032,398
(77,358
)
(7.5
)
Mortgage-backed securities
962,335
945,712
16,623
1.8
Auction rate securities
148,473
159,274
(10,801
)
(6.8
)
Total debt securities
2,425,331
2,522,233
(96,902
)
(3.8
)
Equity securities
45,278
46,201
(923
)
(2.0
)
Total
$
2,470,609
$
2,568,434
$
(97,825
)
(3.8
)%
Total investment securities decreased
$97.8 million
, or
3.8%
, in comparison to
December 31, 2013
, mainly in collateralized mortgage obligations and state and municipal securities, as portfolio cash flows were not fully reinvested due to relatively low yields available on current investment options. Cash flows that were reinvested during the first nine months of 2014 were used to purchase securities with average lives of approximately five years to provide for more structured cash flows, thereby limiting price and extension risk in a rising interest rate environment. State and municipal securities decreased primarily due to maturities that
55
were not fully reinvested. The decrease in ARCs was primarily due to the sales of securities with a total book value of
$11.9 million
, resulting in no gain or loss.
The net pre-tax unrealized loss on available for sale investment securities was
$3.2 million
as of
September 30, 2014
, compared to a
$39.8 million
pre-tax unrealized loss as of
December 31, 2013
. The $36.6 million decrease in the net pre-tax unrealized loss was due to a decrease in market interest rates, which caused the fair values of collateralized mortgage obligations and mortgage-backed securities to increase. See additional details regarding investment security price risk within Item 3, "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk."
Loans, net of unearned income
The following table presents ending balances of loans outstanding, net of unearned income:
Increase (Decrease)
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
$
%
(in thousands)
Real-estate – commercial mortgage
$
5,156,979
$
5,101,922
$
55,057
1.1
%
Commercial – industrial, financial and agricultural
3,691,262
3,628,420
62,842
1.7
Real-estate – home equity
1,733,036
1,764,197
(31,161
)
(1.8
)
Real-estate – residential mortgage
1,372,033
1,337,380
34,653
2.6
Real-estate – construction
687,728
573,672
114,056
19.9
Consumer
278,219
283,124
(4,905
)
(1.7
)
Leasing and other
111,148
93,505
17,643
18.9
Loans, net of unearned income
$
13,030,405
$
12,782,220
$
248,185
1.9
%
The Corporation does not have a concentration of credit risk with any single borrower, industry or geographical location. As of
September 30, 2014
, the Corporation's maximum total lending commitment to an individual borrower was $50.0 million. In addition to limiting the maximum total lending commitment to any individual borrower to $50.0 million, the Corporation has established lower total lending limits for certain types of lending commitments, and lower total lending limits based on the Corporation's internal risk rating of an individual borrower at the time the lending commitment is approved. As of
September 30, 2014
, the Corporation had 66
relationships with total borrowing commitments between $20.0 million and $50.0 million.
Approximately
$5.8 billion
, or
44.9%
, of the loan portfolio was in commercial mortgage and construction loans as of
September 30, 2014
. The performance of these loans can be adversely impacted by fluctuations in real estate values. The Corporation limits its maximum non-owner occupied commercial real estate exposure to $33.0 million to any one borrower, based on the Corporation's internal risk rating at the time the lending commitment is approved, and limits its exposure to any one development project to $15.0 million.
Construction loans include loans to commercial borrowers secured by commercial real estate, loans to commercial borrowers secured by residential real estate, and other construction loans, which represent loans to individuals secured by residential real estate. The following table presents outstanding construction loans and their delinquency rates by these class segments:
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
Balance
Delinquency Rate (1)
% of Total
Balance
Delinquency Rate (1)
% of Total
(dollars in thousands)
Commercial
$
377,206
0.5
%
54.9
%
$
269,497
0.8
%
47.0
%
Commercial - residential
241,419
7.4
35.1
235,369
8.2
41.0
Other
69,103
0.4
10.0
68,806
0.8
12.0
Total Real estate - construction
$
687,728
2.9
%
100.0
%
$
573,672
3.8
%
100.0
%
(1)
Represents all accruing loans 31 days or more past due and non-accrual loans as a percentage of total loans within each class segment.
Construction loans increased
$114.1 million
, or
19.9%
, in comparison to
December 31, 2013
and comprised 5.3% of the total loan portfolio at September 30, 2014 as compared to 4.5% at
December 31, 2013
. Over the past five years, the Corporation reduced its exposure in its construction portfolio, which accounted 8.2% of its total loan portfolio as of December 31, 2009. The growth during the first nine months of 2014 was primarily in commercial construction, which increased
$107.7 million
, or
40.0%
.
56
Geographically, the increase in real estate construction loans was primarily in the Pennsylvania ($58.1 million, or 20.1%), Maryland ($25.5 million, or 41.8%) and New Jersey ($20.6, or 22.7%) markets.
The
$62.8 million
, or
1.7%
, increase in commercial loans was primarily in the New Jersey market. Commercial mortgage loans increased
$55.1 million
in comparison to
December 31, 2013
. Geographically, the increase in was in the New Jersey ($74.2 million, or 5.8%), Maryland ($35.0 million, or 6.5%) and Delaware ($22.1 million, or 11.3%) markets, partially offset by a decrease in the Pennsylvania ($76.0 million, or 2.9%) market.
The following table summarizes the percentage of commercial loans, by industry:
September 30,
2014
December 31, 2013
Services
18.7
%
19.2
%
Manufacturing
14.0
13.5
Construction (1)
11.5
10.0
Retail
10.0
11.0
Wholesale
9.4
9.7
Real estate (2)
7.9
7.0
Health care
7.6
8.1
Agriculture
4.7
5.8
Arts and entertainment
3.5
2.7
Transportation
2.4
2.5
Financial services
1.9
1.6
Other
8.4
8.9
100.0
%
100.0
%
(1)
Includes commercial loans to borrowers engaged in the construction industry.
(2)
Includes commercial loans to borrowers engaged in the business of: renting, leasing or managing real estate for others; selling and/or buying real estate for others; and appraising real estate.
Commercial loans and commercial mortgage loans also include shared national credits, which are participations in loans or loan commitments of at least $20 million that are shared by three or more banks. Below is a summary of the Corporation's outstanding purchased shared national credits:
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
(dollars in thousands)
Commercial - industrial, financial and agricultural
$
141,100
$
129,840
Real estate - commercial mortgage
137,501
87,868
$
278,601
$
217,708
Total shared national credits increased
$60.9 million
, or
28.0%
, in comparison to
December 31, 2013
. The Corporation's shared national credits are to borrowers located in its geographical markets and the increase was due to normal lending activities consistent with the Corporation's underwriting policies. As of
September 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
, none of the shared national credits were past due.
The
$34.7 million
, or
2.6%
, increase in residential mortgages was due to the retention of certain 15-year fixed rate mortgages in the portfolio instead of selling those mortgages to third-party investors.
57
Provision for Credit Losses and Allowance for Credit Losses
The following table presents the activity in the allowance for credit losses:
Three months ended September 30
Nine months ended September 30
2014
2013
2014
2013
(dollars in thousands)
Average balance of loans, net of unearned income
$
12,922,821
$
12,728,162
$
12,827,563
$
12,506,393
Balance of allowance for credit losses at beginning of period
$
193,442
$
217,626
$
204,917
$
225,439
Loans charged off:
Commercial – industrial, financial and agricultural
5,167
9,394
15,804
24,856
Real estate – commercial mortgage
1,557
3,724
5,084
13,050
Real estate – home equity
1,492
2,365
4,377
6,735
Real estate – residential mortgage
231
767
2,166
8,282
Consumer
538
473
1,738
1,456
Real estate – construction
313
598
745
5,181
Leasing and other
306
787
1,434
2,037
Total loans charged off
9,604
18,108
31,348
61,597
Recoveries of loans previously charged off:
Commercial – industrial, financial and agricultural
1,013
2,295
2,532
3,430
Real estate – commercial mortgage
1,167
185
1,641
2,754
Real estate – home equity
336
198
869
721
Real estate – residential mortgage
95
245
319
442
Consumer
448
294
1,059
1,206
Real estate – construction
470
379
852
1,794
Leasing and other
241
224
767
649
Total recoveries
3,770
3,820
8,039
10,996
Net loans charged off
5,834
14,288
23,309
50,601
Provision for credit losses
3,500
9,500
9,500
38,000
Balance of allowance for credit losses at end of period
$
191,108
$
212,838
$
191,108
$
212,838
Net charge-offs to average loans (annualized)
0.18
%
0.45
%
0.24
%
0.54
%
The following table presents the components of the allowance for credit losses:
September 30,
2014
December 31,
2013
(dollars in thousands)
Allowance for loan losses
$
189,477
$
202,780
Reserve for unfunded lending commitments
1,631
2,137
Allowance for credit losses
$
191,108
$
204,917
Allowance for credit losses to loans outstanding
1.47
%
1.60
%
For the three and
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
, the Corporation's provision for credit losses decreased
$6.0 million
, or
63.2%
, and
$28.5 million
, or
75.0%
, respectively, in comparison to the same periods in
2013
. The decreases in the provision for credit losses were due to improvements in credit quality, as shown by a reduction in non-performing loans and overall delinquency.
Net charge-offs decreased $
8.5 million
, or
59.2%
, to
$5.8 million
for the
third
quarter of
2014
, compared to
$14.3 million
for the
third
quarter of
2013
. The decrease in net charge-offs was primarily due to a
$3.1 million
, or
89.0%
, decrease in commercial mortgage net charge-offs and a
$2.9 million
, or
41.5%
, decrease in commercial loan net charge-offs. Of the
$5.8 million
of net charge-offs recorded in the
third
quarter of
2014
, 40.8% were for loans originated in Maryland, 32.6% were for loans originated in New Jersey and 26.5% were for loans originated in Pennsylvania.
58
During the first
nine months
of
2014
, net charge-offs decreased
$27.3 million
, or
53.9%
, to
$23.3 million
, compared to
$50.6 million
for the same period of
2013
. The decrease in net charge-offs was primarily due to an
$8.2 million
, or
38.1%
, decrease in commercial loan net charge-offs, a
$6.9 million
, or
66.6%
, decrease in commercial mortgage net charge-offs and a
$6.0 million
, or
76.4%
, decrease in residential mortgage net charge-offs. Of the
$23.3 million
of net charge-offs recorded during the first
nine months
of
2014
, 58.6%, 26.3% and 16.8% were for loans originated in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Maryland, respectively. Net recoveries were recorded during the first
nine months
of
2014
for loans originated in Delaware and Virginia.
The following table summarizes non-performing assets as of the indicated dates:
September 30, 2014
September 30, 2013
December 31, 2013
(dollars in thousands)
Non-accrual loans
$
126,420
$
143,012
$
133,753
Loans 90 days past due and accruing
17,428
25,271
20,524
Total non-performing loans
143,848
168,283
154,277
Other real estate owned (OREO)
13,489
18,173
15,052
Total non-performing assets
$
157,337
$
186,456
$
169,329
Non-accrual loans to total loans
0.97
%
1.12
%
1.05
%
Non-performing assets to total assets
0.91
%
1.09
%
1.00
%
Allowance for credit losses to non-performing loans
132.85
%
126.48
%
132.82
%
The following table presents accruing loans whose terms have been modified under troubled debt restructurings (TDRs), by type, as of the indicated dates:
September 30, 2014
September 30, 2013
December 31, 2013
(in thousands)
Real estate – residential mortgage
$
30,850
$
27,820
$
28,815
Real estate – commercial mortgage
18,869
22,644
19,758
Real estate – construction
9,251
9,841
10,117
Commercial – industrial, financial and agricultural
5,115
8,184
8,045
Real estate – home equity
2,904
1,667
1,365
Consumer
23
11
11
Total accruing TDRs
67,012
70,167
68,111
Non-accrual TDRs (1)
27,724
30,501
30,209
Total TDRs
$
94,736
$
100,668
$
98,320
(1) Included with non-accrual loans in the preceding table.
TDRs modified during the first nine months of
2014
and still outstanding as of
September 30, 2014
totaled
$17.2 million
. During the first nine months of
2014
,
$4.8 million
of TDRs that were modified within the previous 12 months had a payment default, which the Corporation defines as a single missed scheduled payment, subsequent to modification.
59
The following table presents the changes in non-accrual loans for the three and
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
:
Commercial -
Industrial,
Financial and
Agricultural
Real Estate -
Commercial
Mortgage
Real Estate -
Construction
Real Estate -
Residential
Mortgage
Real Estate -
Home
Equity
Consumer
Leasing
Total
(in thousands)
Three months ended September 30, 2014
Balance of non-accrual loans at June 30, 2014
$
35,980
$
41,936
$
19,236
$
21,053
$
11,729
$
—
$
—
$
129,934
Additions
6,885
8,766
2,813
1,796
2,846
538
—
23,644
Payments
(4,400
)
(5,353
)
(1,850
)
(178
)
(1,132
)
—
—
(12,913
)
Charge-offs
(5,167
)
(1,557
)
(313
)
(231
)
(1,492
)
(533
)
—
(9,293
)
Transfers to accrual status
(2,302
)
—
—
(30
)
(160
)
(5
)
—
(2,497
)
Transfers to OREO status
(11
)
(945
)
(231
)
(560
)
(708
)
—
—
(2,455
)
Balance of non-accrual loans as of September 30, 2014
$
30,985
$
42,847
$
19,655
$
21,850
$
11,083
$
—
$
—
$
126,420
Nine months ended September 30, 2014
Balance of non-accrual loans as of December 31, 2013
$
36,710
$
40,566
$
20,921
$
22,282
$
13,272
$
2
$
—
$
133,753
Additions
27,054
23,190
3,964
8,601
8,397
1,742
407
73,355
Payments
(13,910
)
(13,965
)
(4,185
)
(1,624
)
(2,512
)
(6
)
—
(36,202
)
Charge-offs
(15,804
)
(5,084
)
(745
)
(2,166
)
(4,377
)
(1,733
)
(407
)
(30,316
)
Transfers to accrual status
(2,302
)
(54
)
—
(2,358
)
(1,718
)
(5
)
—
(6,437
)
Transfers to OREO status
(763
)
(1,806
)
(300
)
(2,885
)
(1,979
)
—
—
(7,733
)
Balance of non-accrual loans as of September 30, 2014
$
30,985
$
42,847
$
19,655
$
21,850
$
11,083
$
—
$
—
$
126,420
Non-accrual loans decreased
$16.6 million
, or
11.6%
, in comparison to
September 30, 2013
and
$7.3 million
in comparison to
December 31, 2013
. Total non-accrual additions for the three and
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
were
$23.6 million
and
$73.4 million
, respectively, compared to additions for the three and
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
of $22.1 million and $105.7 million, respectively.
The following table summarizes non-performing loans, by type, as of the indicated dates:
September 30, 2014
September 30, 2013
December 31, 2013
(in thousands)
Real estate – commercial mortgage
$
44,602
$
42,623
$
44,068
Commercial – industrial, financial and agricultural
33,277
45,184
38,021
Real estate – residential mortgage
28,135
34,309
31,347
Real estate – construction
19,860
24,396
21,267
Real estate – home equity
15,071
18,691
16,983
Leasing
388
67
48
Consumer
2,515
3,013
2,543
Total non-performing loans
$
143,848
$
168,283
$
154,277
Non-performing commercial loans decreased
$11.9 million
, or
26.4%
, in comparison to
September 30, 2013
, primarily in the Pennsylvania market. Non-performing residential mortgages decreased
$6.2 million
, or
18.0%
, in comparison to
September 30, 2013
. Geographically, the decrease was primarily in the New Jersey ($4.2 million, or 39.9%) market. Non-performing construction loans decreased
$4.5 million
, or
18.6%
, in comparison to
September 30, 2013
.
Geographically, the decrease occurred primarily in the Pennsylvania ($2.4 million, or 18.3%) and Maryland ($1.9 million, or 32.0%) markets.
60
The following table summarizes the Corporation’s OREO, by property type, as of the indicated dates:
September 30, 2014
September 30, 2013
December 31, 2013
(in thousands)
Residential properties
$
8,121
$
5,836
$
7,052
Commercial properties
3,758
9,514
5,586
Undeveloped land
1,610
2,823
2,414
Total OREO
$
13,489
$
18,173
$
15,052
The Corporation's ability to identify potential problem loans in a timely manner is important to maintaining an adequate allowance for credit losses. For commercial loans, commercial mortgages and construction loans to commercial borrowers, an internal risk rating process is used to monitor credit quality. For a description of the Corporation's risk ratings, see Note E, "Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The evaluation of credit risk for residential mortgages, home equity loans, construction loans to individuals, consumer loans and lease receivables is based on payment history, through the monitoring of delinquency levels and trends.
Total internally risk rated loans were
$9.5 billion
as of
September 30, 2014
and $9.2 billion as of
December 31, 2013
. The following table presents internal risk ratings for commercial loans, commercial mortgages and construction loans to commercial borrowers with internal risk ratings of Special Mention (considered criticized loans) or Substandard or lower (considered classified loans), by class segment:
Special Mention
Increase (decrease)
Substandard or lower
Increase (decrease)
Total Criticized and Classified Loans
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
$
%
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
$
%
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
(dollars in thousands)
Real estate - commercial mortgage
$
113,650
$
141,013
$
(27,363
)
(19.4
)%
$
165,425
$
196,922
$
(31,497
)
(16.0
)%
$
279,075
$
337,935
Commercial - secured
138,136
111,613
26,523
23.8
129,273
125,382
3,891
3.1
267,409
236,995
Commercial -unsecured
12,246
11,666
580
5.0
5,256
2,755
2,501
90.8
17,502
14,421
Total Commercial - industrial, financial and agricultural
150,382
123,279
27,103
22.0
134,529
128,137
6,392
5.0
284,911
251,416
Construction - commercial residential
28,517
31,522
(3,005
)
(9.5
)
42,875
57,806
(14,931
)
(25.8
)
71,392
89,328
Construction - commercial
1,469
2,932
(1,463
)
(49.9
)
5,550
8,124
(2,574
)
(31.7
)
7,019
11,056
Total real estate - construction (excluding construction - other)
29,986
34,454
(4,468
)
(13.0
)
48,425
65,930
(17,505
)
(26.6
)
78,411
100,384
Total
$
294,018
$
298,746
$
(4,728
)
(1.6
)%
$
348,379
$
390,989
$
(42,610
)
(10.9
)%
$
642,397
$
689,735
% of total risk rated loans
3.1
%
3.2
%
3.7
%
4.2
%
6.8
%
7.4
%
As of
September 30, 2014
, total loans with risk ratings of Substandard or lower decreased
$42.6 million
, or
10.9%
, in comparison to
December 31, 2013
, primarily due to decreases in substandard commercial mortgages and construction loans to commercial borrowers. Special mention loans decreased
$4.7 million
, or
1.6%
, in comparison to
December 31, 2013
due to a decrease in special mention commercial mortgages and residential construction loans to commercial borrowers, partially offset by an increase in special mention commercial loans.
61
The following table summarizes loan delinquency rates, by type, as of the dates indicated:
September 30, 2014
September 30, 2013
December 31, 2013
31-89
Days
≥ 90 Days (1)
Total
31-89
Days
≥ 90 Days (1)
Total
31-89
Days
≥ 90 Days (1)
Total
Real estate – commercial mortgage
0.48
%
0.86
%
1.34
%
0.40
%
0.84
%
1.24
%
0.38
%
0.87
%
1.25
%
Commercial – industrial, financial and agricultural
0.28
%
0.91
%
1.19
%
0.32
%
1.24
%
1.56
%
0.30
%
1.04
%
1.34
%
Real estate – construction
0.03
%
2.89
%
2.92
%
0.40
%
4.22
%
4.62
%
0.11
%
3.71
%
3.82
%
Real estate – residential mortgage
1.81
%
2.06
%
3.87
%
1.82
%
2.58
%
4.40
%
1.74
%
2.34
%
4.08
%
Real estate – home equity
0.59
%
0.87
%
1.46
%
1.03
%
1.05
%
2.08
%
0.91
%
0.96
%
1.87
%
Consumer, leasing and other
1.41
%
0.75
%
2.16
%
1.91
%
0.79
%
2.70
%
1.99
%
0.68
%
2.67
%
Total
0.58
%
1.11
%
1.69
%
0.66
%
1.31
%
1.97
%
0.61
%
1.20
%
1.81
%
Total dollars (in thousands)
$
75,976
$
143,848
$
219,824
$
83,941
$
168,283
$
252,224
$
77,667
$
154,277
$
231,944
(1)
Includes non-accrual loans.
The Corporation believes that the allowance for credit losses of
$191.1 million
as of
September 30, 2014
is sufficient to cover incurred losses in both the loan portfolio and the unfunded lending commitments as of that date and is appropriate based on applicable accounting standards.
Deposits and Borrowings
The following table presents ending deposits, by type:
Increase
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
$
%
(dollars in thousands)
Noninterest-bearing demand
$
3,556,810
$
3,283,172
$
273,638
8.3
%
Interest-bearing demand
3,164,514
2,945,210
219,304
7.4
Savings
3,620,919
3,344,882
276,037
8.3
Total demand and savings
10,342,243
9,573,264
768,979
8.0
Time deposits
2,991,384
2,917,922
73,462
2.5
Total deposits
$
13,333,627
$
12,491,186
$
842,441
6.7
%
Non-interest bearing demand deposits increased
$273.6 million
, or
8.3%
, due primarily to a $258.1 million, or 10.6%, increase in business account balances and a $13.7 million, or 13.2%, increase in municipal account balances.
Interest-bearing demand accounts increased
$219.3 million
, or
7.4%
, primarily due to a $228.0 million, or 21.0%, seasonal increase in municipal account balances and a $31.0 million, or 28.4%, increase in business account balances, partially offset by $39.6 million, or 2.3%, decrease in personal account balances. The
$276.0 million
, or
8.3%
, increase in savings account balances was due to a $240.7 million, or 50.4%, seasonal increase in municipal account balances and a $34.8 million, or 1.6%, increase in personal account balances. The
$73.5 million
, or
2.5%
, increase in time deposits was due to an increase in time deposits with original maturities of 4 to 5 years due to promotional efforts intended to lock in longer-term rates.
62
The following table summarizes the changes in ending borrowings, by type:
Increase (Decrease)
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
$
%
(dollars in thousands)
Short-term borrowings:
Customer repurchase agreements
$
195,121
$
175,621
$
19,500
11.1
%
Customer short-term promissory notes
78,225
100,572
(22,347
)
(22.2
)
Total short-term customer funding
273,346
276,193
(2,847
)
(1.0
)
Federal funds purchased
6,606
582,436
(575,830
)
(98.9
)
Short-term FHLB advances (1)
285,000
400,000
(115,000
)
(28.8
)
Total short-term borrowings
564,952
1,258,629
(693,677
)
(55.1
)
Long-term debt:
FHLB advances
648,477
513,854
134,623
26.2
Other long-term debt
369,812
369,730
82
—
Total long-term debt
1,018,289
883,584
134,705
15.2
Total borrowings
$
1,583,241
$
2,142,213
(558,972
)
(26.1
)%
(1) Represents FHLB advances with an original maturity term of less than one year.
The
$693.7 million
reduction in total short-term borrowings reflects the use of a portion of the
$842.4 million
increase in deposits to repay short-term borrowings, as well as a change in funding mix from short-term federal funds purchased and short-term FHLB advances to long-term FHLB advances.
Shareholders' Equity
Total shareholders’ equity increased
$14.8 million
, or
0.7%
, during the first
nine
months of
2014
. The increase was due primarily to
$119.9 million
of net income and a
$23.8 million
increase in after-tax unrealized holding gains on available for sale investment securities, partially offset by
$95.3 million
of stock repurchases and
$45.0 million
of common stock cash dividends.
In October 2013, the Corporation announced that its board of directors had approved a share repurchase program pursuant to which the Corporation was authorized to repurchase up to 4.0 million shares, or approximately 2.1% of its outstanding shares, through March 2014. During the first quarter of 2014, the Corporation repurchased 4.0 million shares at an average cost of $12.45 per share, completing this repurchase program on February 19, 2014.
In
May 2014
, the Corporation announced that its board of directors had approved a share repurchase program pursuant to which the Corporation was authorized to repurchase up to
4.0 million
shares, or approximately
2.1%
of its outstanding shares, through
December 31, 2014
. During the third quarter of 2014, 4.0 million shares were repurchased by the Corporation at an average cost of $11.36 per share, completing this repurchase program on August 25, 2014.
The Corporation and its subsidiary banks are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by various banking regulators. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements could result in certain actions by regulators that could have a material effect on the Corporation’s financial statements. The regulations require that banks maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and Tier I capital to average assets (as defined).
As of
September 30, 2014
, the Corporation and each of its bank subsidiaries met the minimum requirements. In addition, each of the Corporation’s bank subsidiaries’ capital ratios exceeded the amounts required to be considered "well capitalized" as defined in the regulations.
The following table summarizes the Corporation’s capital ratios in comparison to regulatory requirements:
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
Regulatory
Minimum
for Capital
Adequacy
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
14.5
%
15.0
%
8.0
%
Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
13.0
%
13.1
%
4.0
%
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)
10.6
%
10.6
%
4.0
%
63
In July 2013, the Federal Reserve Board approved final rules (the "U.S. Basel III Capital Rules") establishing a new comprehensive capital framework for U.S. banking organizations and implementing the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's December 2010 framework for strengthening international capital standards. The U.S. Basel III Capital Rules substantially revise the risk-based capital requirements applicable to bank holding companies and depository institutions.
The new minimum regulatory capital requirements established by the U.S. Basel III Capital Rules are effective for the Corporation beginning on January 1, 2015, and become fully phased in on January 1, 2019.
When fully phased in, the U.S. Basel III Capital Rules will require the Corporation and its bank subsidiaries to:
•
Meet a new minimum Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.50% of risk-weighted assets and a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.00% of risk-weighted assets;
•
Continue to require the current minimum Total capital ratio of 8.00% of risk-weighted assets and the minimum Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of 4.00% of average assets;
•
Maintain a "capital conservation buffer" of 2.50% above the minimum risk-based capital requirements, which must be maintained to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and certain discretionary bonus payments; and
•
Comply with a revised definition of capital to improve the ability of regulatory capital instruments to absorb losses. Certain non-qualifying capital instruments, including cumulative preferred stock and trust preferred securities, will be excluded as a component of Tier 1 capital for institutions of the Corporation's size.
The U.S. Basel III Capital Rules use a standardized approach for risk weightings that expands the risk-weightings for assets and off balance sheet exposures from the current 0%, 20%, 50% and 100% categories to a much larger and more risk-sensitive number of categories, depending on the nature of the assets and off-balance sheet exposures and resulting in higher risk weights for a variety of asset categories.
As of
September 30, 2014
, the Corporation believes its current capital levels would meet the fully-phased in minimum capital
requirements, including the capital conservation buffers, as prescribed in the U.S. Basel III Capital Rules.
Liquidity
The Corporation must maintain a sufficient level of liquid assets to meet the cash needs of its customers who, as depositors, may want to withdraw funds or who, as borrowers, need credit availability. Liquidity is provided on a continuous basis through scheduled and unscheduled principal and interest payments on outstanding loans and investments and through the availability of deposits and borrowings. The Corporation also maintains secondary sources that provide liquidity on a secured and unsecured basis to meet short-term and long-term needs.
The Corporation maintains liquidity sources in the form of demand and savings deposits, time deposits, repurchase agreements and short-term promissory notes. The Corporation can access additional liquidity from these sources, if necessary, by increasing interest rates. The positive impact to liquidity resulting from higher interest rates could have a detrimental impact on the net interest margin and net income if rates on interest-earning assets do not experience a proportionate increase.
Borrowing availability with the FHLB and the Federal Reserve Bank, along with Federal funds lines at various correspondent banks, provides the Corporation with additional liquidity.
Each of the Corporation’s subsidiary banks is a member of the FHLB and has access to FHLB overnight and term credit facilities. As of
September 30, 2014
, the Corporation had
$933.5 million
of short and long-term advances outstanding from the FHLB with an additional borrowing capacity of approximately $2.1 billion under these facilities. Advances from the FHLB are secured by qualifying commercial real estate and residential mortgage loans, investments and other assets.
As of
September 30, 2014
, the Corporation had aggregate availability under Federal funds lines of $1.3 billion, with
$6.6 million
of that amount outstanding. A combination of commercial real estate loans, commercial loans and securities are pledged to the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia to provide access to Federal Reserve Bank Discount Window borrowings. As of
September 30, 2014
, the Corporation had $1.1 billion of collateralized borrowing availability at the Discount Window, and no outstanding borrowings.
Liquidity must also be managed at the Fulton Financial Corporation parent company level. For safety and soundness reasons, banking regulations limit the amount of cash that can be transferred from subsidiary banks to the parent company in the form of loans and dividends. Generally, these limitations are based on the subsidiary banks’ regulatory capital levels and their net income.
64
Management continues to monitor the liquidity and capital needs of the parent company and will implement appropriate strategies, as necessary, to remain adequately capitalized and to meet its cash needs.
The Corporation’s sources and uses of funds were discussed in general terms in the net interest income section of Management’s Discussion. The consolidated statements of cash flows provide additional information. The Corporation’s operating activities during the first
nine
months of
2014
generated
$147.9 million
of cash, mainly due to net income, as adjusted for non-cash expenses, most notably depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment and the provision for credit losses, partially offset by a net decrease in other liabilities and loans held for sale. Cash used in investing activities was
$293.5 million
, due mainly to an increase in loans and a net increase in short-term investments, partially offset by proceeds from the maturities and sales of investment securities in excess of purchases. Net cash provided by financing activities was
$148.0 million
due to increases in deposits and additions to long-term debt, partially offset by a net decrease in short-term borrowings, acquisitions of treasury stock and dividends paid on common shares.
65
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk is the exposure to economic loss that arises from changes in the values of certain financial instruments. The types of market risk exposures generally faced by financial institutions include interest rate risk, equity market price risk, debt security market price risk, foreign currency risk and commodity price risk. Due to the nature of its operations, only equity market price risk, debt security market price risk and interest rate risk are significant to the Corporation.
Equity Market Price Risk
Equity market price risk is the risk that changes in the values of equity investments could have a material impact on the financial position or results of operations of the Corporation. As of
September 30, 2014
, equity investments consisted of
$39.3 million
of common stocks of publicly traded financial institutions, and
$6.0 million
of other equity investments.
The equity investments most susceptible to equity market price risk are the financial institutions stocks, which had a cost basis of approximately
$28.6 million
and a fair value of
$39.3 million
at
September 30, 2014
, including an investment in a single financial institution with a cost basis of
$20.0 million
and a fair value of
$27.5 million
. The fair value of this investment accounted for
70.0%
of the fair value of the common stocks of publicly traded financial institutions. No other investment within the financial institutions stock portfolio exceeded
5%
of the portfolio's fair value. In total, the financial institutions stock portfolio had gross unrealized gains of $10.7 million and gross unrealized losses of $21,000 as of
September 30, 2014
.
Management continuously monitors the fair value of its equity investments and evaluates current market conditions and operating results of the issuers. Periodic sale and purchase decisions are made based on this monitoring process. None of the Corporation’s equity securities are classified as trading.
In addition to its equity portfolio, investment management and trust services income may be impacted by fluctuations in the equity markets. A portion of this revenue is based on the value of the underlying investment portfolios, many of which include equity investments. If the values of those investment portfolios decrease, whether due to factors influencing U.S. equity markets in general or otherwise, the Corporation’s revenue would be negatively impacted. In addition, the Corporation’s ability to sell its brokerage services in the future will be dependent, in part, upon consumers’ level of confidence in financial markets.
Debt Security Market Price Risk
Debt security market price risk is the risk that changes in the values of debt securities, unrelated to interest rate changes, could have a material impact on the financial position or results of operations of the Corporation. The Corporation’s debt security investments consist primarily of U.S. government sponsored agency issued mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, state and municipal securities, U.S. government debt securities, auction rate securities and corporate debt securities. All of the Corporation's investments in mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations have principal payments that are guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored agencies.
Municipal Securities
As of
September 30, 2014
, the Corporation had $
257.6 million
of securities issued by various municipalities. Ongoing uncertainty with respect to the financial strength of municipal bond insurers places much greater emphasis on the underlying strength of issuers. Continued pressure on local tax revenues of issuers due to adverse economic conditions could have an adverse impact on the underlying credit quality of issuers. The Corporation evaluates existing and potential holdings primarily based on the creditworthiness of the issuing municipality and then, to a lesser extent, on any underlying credit enhancement. Municipal securities can be supported by the general obligation of the issuing municipality, allowing the securities to be repaid by any means available to the issuing municipality. As of
September 30, 2014
, approximately 95% of municipal securities were supported by the general obligation of corresponding municipalities. Approximately 87% of these securities were school district issuances, which are also supported by the states of the issuing municipalities.
Auction Rate Certificates
As of
September 30, 2014
, the Corporation’s investments in student loan auction rate certificates (ARCs), had a cost basis of
$158.7 million
and a fair value of
$148.5 million
.
ARCs are long-term securities that were structured to allow their sale in periodic auctions, resulting in both the treatment of ARCs as short-term instruments in normal market conditions and fair values that could be derived based on periodic auction prices. However, beginning in 2008, market auctions for these securities began to fail due to an insufficient number of buyers, resulting in an illiquid market. Therefore, as of
September 30, 2014
, the fair values of the ARCs currently in the portfolio were derived using significant unobservable inputs based on an expected cash flows model which produced fair values which were materially different from those that would be expected from settlement of these investments in the current market. The expected cash flows
66
model, prepared by a third-party valuation expert, produced fair values which assumed a return to market liquidity sometime within the next five years. The Corporation believes that the trusts underlying the ARCs will self-liquidate as student loans are repaid.
The credit quality of the underlying debt associated with ARCs is also a factor in the determination of their estimated fair value. As of
September 30, 2014
, approximately
$144 million
, or
97%
, of the ARCs were rated above investment grade, with approximately
$6 million
, or
4%
, AAA rated and
$104 million
, or
72%
, AA rated. Approximately
$4 million
, or
3%
, of ARCs were either not rated or rated below investment grade by at least one ratings agency. Of this amount, approximately
$3 million
of the student loans underlying these ARCs have principal payments which are guaranteed by the federal government. In total, approximately
$147 million
, or
99%
, of the student loans underlying the ARCs have principal payments which are guaranteed by the federal government. As of
September 30, 2014
, all ARCs were current and making scheduled interest payments.
Corporate Debt Securities
The Corporation holds corporate debt securities in the form of pooled trust preferred securities, single-issuer trust preferred securities and subordinated debt issued by financial institutions, as presented in the following table as of
September 30, 2014
:
Amortized
cost
Estimated
fair value
(in thousands)
Single-issuer trust preferred securities
$
47,546
$
44,075
Subordinated debt
47,498
50,289
Pooled trust preferred securities
2,050
4,487
Corporate debt securities issued by financial institutions
$
97,094
$
98,851
The fair values for pooled trust preferred securities and certain single-issuer trust preferred securities were based on quotes provided by third-party brokers who determined fair values based predominantly on internal valuation models which were not indicative prices or binding offers.
The Corporation’s investments in single-issuer trust preferred securities had an unrealized loss of
$3.5 million
at
September 30, 2014
. The Corporation did not record any other-than-temporary impairment charges for single-issuer trust preferred securities during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
or
2013
.
Six
of the Corporation's
20
single-issuer trust preferred securities were rated below investment grade by at least one ratings agency, with an amortized cost of
$13.5 million
and an estimated fair value of
$12.3 million
as of
September 30, 2014
. All of the single-issuer trust preferred securities rated below investment grade were rated BB or Ba. Single-issuer trust preferred securities with an amortized cost of
$4.7 million
and an estimated fair value of
$3.9 million
at
September 30, 2014
were not rated by any ratings agency.
As of
September 30, 2014
, all
six
of the Corporation's pooled trust preferred securities with an amortized cost of
$2.1 million
and an estimated fair value of
$4.5 million
, were rated below investment grade by at least one ratings agency, with ratings ranging from C to Ca. The class of securities held by the Corporation was below the most senior tranche, with the Corporation’s interests being subordinate to other investors in the pools.
The amortized cost of pooled trust preferred securities is the purchase price of the securities, net of cumulative credit related other-than-temporary impairment charges, determined using an expected cash flows model. The most significant input to the expected cash flows model was the expected payment deferral rate for each pooled trust preferred security. The Corporation evaluates the financial metrics, such as capital ratios and non-performing asset ratios, of the individual financial institution issuers that comprise each pooled trust preferred security to estimate its expected deferral rate.
During the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
, the Corporation recorded $18,000 of other than temporary impairment charges for pooled trust preferred securities. Additional impairment charges for corporate debt securities issued by financial institutions may be necessary in the future depending upon the performance of the individual investments.
See Note D, "Investment Securities," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion related to other-than-temporary impairment evaluations for debt securities and Note M, "Fair Value Measurements," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion related to the fair values of debt securities.
67
Interest Rate Risk, Asset/Liability Management and Liquidity
Interest rate risk creates exposure in two primary areas. First, changes in rates have an impact on the Corporation’s liquidity position and could affect its ability to meet obligations and continue to grow. Second, movements in interest rates can create fluctuations in the Corporation’s net interest income and changes in the economic value of its equity.
The Corporation employs various management techniques to minimize its exposure to interest rate risk. An Asset/Liability Management Committee (ALCO), consisting of key financial and senior management personnel, meets on a regular basis. The ALCO is responsible for reviewing the interest rate sensitivity and liquidity positions of the Corporation, approving asset and liability management policies, and overseeing the formulation and implementation of strategies regarding balance sheet positions.
From a liquidity standpoint, the Corporation must maintain a sufficient level of liquid assets to meet the cash needs of its customers, who, as depositors, may want to withdraw funds or who, as borrowers, need credit availability. Liquidity is provided on a continuous basis through scheduled and unscheduled principal and interest payments on outstanding loans and investments and through the availability of deposits and borrowings. The Corporation also maintains secondary sources that provide liquidity on a secured and unsecured basis to meet short-term and long-term needs.
The following table provides information about the Corporation’s interest rate sensitive financial instruments as of
September 30, 2014
. The table presents expected cash flows and weighted average rates for each of the Corporation's significant interest rate sensitive financial instruments, by expected maturity period. None of the Corporation’s financial instruments are classified as trading. All dollar amounts are in thousands.
Expected Maturity Period
Estimated
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Beyond
Total
Fair Value
Fixed rate loans (1)
$
979,605
$
477,082
$
360,627
$
360,794
$
208,873
$
654,018
$
3,040,999
$
3,025,002
Average rate
3.87
%
4.47
%
4.37
%
4.65
%
4.57
%
3.90
%
4.17
%
Floating rate loans (1) (2)
2,384,919
1,467,374
1,196,069
1,028,622
1,369,511
2,540,265
9,986,760
9,881,516
Average rate
3.81
%
3.96
%
3.98
%
3.97
%
3.83
%
3.97
%
3.91
%
Fixed rate investments (3)
384,258
334,001
270,899
222,095
196,268
822,832
2,230,353
2,229,442
Average rate
2.77
%
2.79
%
2.80
%
2.62
%
2.59
%
2.70
%
2.72
%
Floating rate investments (3)
15
4,963
163,680
41
38
40,690
209,427
196,261
Average rate
1.00
%
0.94
%
1.99
%
1.62
%
2.09
%
1.44
%
1.86
%
Other interest-earning assets
316,735
—
—
—
—
86,056
402,791
402,791
Average rate
0.37
%
—
%
—
%
—
%
—
%
4.42
%
0.37
%
Total
$
4,065,532
$
2,283,420
$
1,991,275
$
1,611,552
$
1,774,690
$
4,143,861
$
15,870,330
$
15,735,012
Average rate
3.46
%
3.89
%
3.73
%
3.94
%
3.78
%
3.69
%
3.70
%
Fixed rate deposits (4)
$
1,410,310
$
465,112
$
313,816
$
98,102
$
314,450
$
22,882
$
2,624,672
$
2,640,788
Average rate
0.70
%
1.02
%
1.29
%
1.50
%
2.08
%
1.84
%
1.03
%
Floating rate deposits (5)
4,947,476
831,604
458,962
398,349
341,540
174,214
7,152,145
7,131,190
Average rate
0.15
%
0.11
%
0.09
%
0.08
%
0.08
%
0.10
%
0.13
%
Fixed rate borrowings (6)
187,323
729
551,539
565
100,452
161,185
1,001,793
1,007,287
Average rate
3.66
%
4.47
%
4.49
%
4.67
%
1.87
%
6.17
%
4.34
%
Floating rate borrowings (7)
564,952
—
—
—
—
16,496
581,448
570,406
Average rate
0.18
%
—
%
—
%
—
%
—
%
2.37
%
0.25
%
Total
$
7,110,061
$
1,297,445
$
1,324,317
$
497,016
$
756,442
$
374,777
$
11,360,058
$
11,349,671
Average rate
0.35
%
0.43
%
2.21
%
0.37
%
1.15
%
2.92
%
0.72
%
(1)
Amounts are based on contractual payments and maturities, adjusted for expected prepayments. Excludes $2.6 million of overdraft deposit balances.
(2)
Line of credit amounts are based on historical cash flows, with an average life of approximately 5 years.
(3)
Amounts are based on contractual maturities; adjusted for expected prepayments on mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations and expected calls on agency and municipal securities. Excludes equity securities as such investments do not have maturity dates.
(4)
Amounts are based on contractual maturities of time deposits.
(5)
Estimated based on history of deposit flows.
(6)
Amounts are based on contractual maturities of debt instruments, adjusted for possible calls. Amounts also include junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures.
(7)
Amounts include Federal Funds purchased, short-term promissory notes and securities sold under agreements to repurchase, which mature in less than 90 days, in addition to junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures.
68
The preceding table and discussion addressed the liquidity implications of interest rate risk and focused on expected cash flows from financial instruments. Expected maturities, however, do not necessarily reflect the net interest impact of interest rate changes. Certain financial instruments, such as adjustable rate loans, have repricing periods that differ from expected cash flows periods.
Included within the
$10.0 billion
of floating rate loans above are $3.6 billion of loans, or 35.8% of the total, that float with the prime interest rate, $2.0 billion, or 19.7%, of loans that float with other interest rates, primarily the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), and $4.4 billion, or 44.5%, of adjustable rate loans. The $4.4 billion of adjustable rate loans include loans that are fixed rate instruments for a certain period of time, and then convert to floating rates.
The following table presents the percentage of adjustable rate loans, at
September 30, 2014
, stratified by the period until their next repricing:
Percent of Total
Adjustable Rate
Loans
One year
29.8%
Two years
17.6
Three years
15.9
Four years
16.2
Five years
11.0
Greater than five years
9.5
The Corporation uses two complementary methods to measure and manage interest rate risk. They are simulation of net interest income and estimates of economic value of equity. Using these measurements in tandem provides a reasonably comprehensive summary of the magnitude of the Corporation's interest rate risk, level of risk as time evolves, and exposure to changes in interest rates.
Simulation of net interest income is performed for the next twelve-month period. A variety of interest rate scenarios are used to measure the effects of sudden and gradual movements upward and downward in the yield curve. These results are compared to the results obtained in a flat or unchanged interest rate scenario. Simulation of net interest income is used primarily to measure the Corporation’s short-term earnings exposure to rate movements. The Corporation’s policy limits the potential exposure of net interest income, in a non-parallel instantaneous shock, to 10% of the base case net interest income for a 100 basis point shock in interest rates, 15% for a 200 basis point shock and 20% for a 300 basis point shock. A "shock" is an immediate upward or downward movement of interest rates. The shocks do not take into account changes in customer behavior that could result in changes to mix and/or volumes in the balance sheet, nor do they account for competitive pricing over the forward 12-month period.
The following table summarizes the expected impact of interest rate shocks on net interest income (due to the current level of interest rates, the 200 and 300 basis point downward shock scenarios are not shown):
Rate Shock (1)
Annual change
in net interest income
% Change
+300 bp
+ $ 61.0 million
+12.1%
+200 bp
+ $ 38.2 million
+7.6
+100 bp
+ $ 15.8 million
+3.1
–100 bp
– $ 18.9 million
–3.8
(1)
These results include the effect of implicit and explicit floors that limit further reduction in interest rates.
Economic value of equity estimates the discounted present value of asset cash flows and liability cash flows. Discount rates are based upon market prices for like assets and liabilities. Upward and downward shocks of interest rates are used to determine the comparative effect of such interest rate movements relative to the unchanged environment. This measurement tool is used primarily to evaluate the longer-term repricing risks and options in the Corporation’s balance sheet. The Corporation's policy limits the economic value of equity that may be at risk, in a non-parallel instantaneous shock, to 10% of the base case economic value of equity for a 100 basis point shock in interest rates, 20% for a 200 basis point shock and 30% for a 300 basis point shock. As of
September 30, 2014
, the Corporation was within policy limits for every 100 basis point shock.
69
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Corporation carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Corporation’s management, including the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15, promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). Based upon that evaluation, the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective. Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in Corporation reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.
There have been no changes in the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter covered by this quarterly report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.
70
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Corporation and its subsidiaries are involved in various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business of the Corporation. The Corporation periodically evaluates the possible impact of pending litigation matters based on, among other factors, the advice of counsel, available insurance coverage and recorded liabilities and reserves for probable legal liabilities and costs. In addition, from time to time, the Corporation is the subject of investigations or other forms of regulatory or governmental inquiry covering a range of possible issues and, in some cases, these may be part of similar reviews of the specified activities of other industry participants. These inquiries could lead to administrative, civil or criminal proceedings, and could possibly result in fines, penalties, restitution or the need to alter the Corporation’s business practices, and cause the Corporation to incur additional costs. The Corporation’s practice is to cooperate fully with regulatory and governmental investigations.
As of the date of this report, the Corporation believes that any liabilities, individually or in the aggregate, which may result from the final outcomes of pending proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, the operating results and/or the liquidity of the Corporation. However, legal proceedings are often unpredictable, and the actual results of such proceedings cannot be determined with certainty.
Regulatory Matters
In July 2014, three wholly owned banking subsidiaries of the Corporation, Fulton Bank, N.A., Swineford National Bank and FNB Bank, N.A., each entered into a Stipulation and Consent to the Issuance of a Consent Order (Consent Order) with their primary Federal bank regulatory agency, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency relating to identified deficiencies in a centralized Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering compliance program, which was designed to comply with the requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act, the USA Patriot Act of 2001 and related anti-money laundering regulations (collectively, the "BSA/AML Requirements") as disclosed by the Corporation in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 18, 2014. The Consent Orders require, among other things that the banking subsidiaries in question review, assess and take actions to strengthen and enhance their compliance programs related to the BSA/AML Requirements (BSA/AML Compliance Program).
In September 2014, the Corporation and its wholly owned banking subsidiary, Lafayette Ambassador Bank (Lafayette), entered into a consent cease and desist order (Cease and Desist Order) with their primary Federal bank regulatory agency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Reserve Board), as disclosed by the Corporation in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 9, 2014. The Cease and Desist Order requires, among other things, that the Corporation and Lafayette strengthen the BSA/AML Compliance Program and imposes requirements similar to those set forth in the Consent Orders. In addition, the Cease and Desist Order requires the Corporation to engage an independent third-party firm to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the BSA/AML Compliance Program, and that Lafayette engage an independent third-party firm to conduct a retrospective review of account and transaction activity from January 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 associated with high-risk customers to determine whether suspicious activity was properly identified and reported in accordance with the BSA/AML requirements. Based on the results of this review the Reserve Board may require a review of transactions for additional time periods. Further, because the Consent Orders and the Cease and Desist Order relate to the BSA/AML Compliance Program, which is operated jointly for all of the Corporation’s subsidiary banks, management anticipates that one or both of the Corporation's other subsidiary banks will also become subject to an enforcement action related to the BSA/AML Requirements, and the provisions of any such enforcement action may differ from those of the Consent Orders and Cease and Desist Order.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The discussion under the heading “Regulatory Compliance and Risk Management Matters” contained in Part I, Item 2 (Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations) of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, supplements and modifies the discussion of the risk factor
“The supervision and regulation to which the Corporation is subject is increasing and can be a competitive disadvantage; the Corporation may incur fines, penalties and other negative consequences from regulatory violations, including inadvertent or unintentional violations”
as set forth in Part I, Item 1A of the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. There have been no other material changes to the risk factors as previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2013
.
71
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table presents the Corporation's monthly repurchases of its common stock during the third quarter of 2014:
Period
Total Number of Shares Purchased
Average Price Paid per Share
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
July 1, 2014 to July 31, 2014
1,316,158
$11.46
1,316,158
2,683,842
August 1, 2014 to August 31, 2014
2,683,842
$11.32
2,683,842
—
September 1, 2014 to September 30, 2014
—
—
—
—
On May 28,2014, the Corporation announced that its board of directors had approved a share repurchase program pursuant to which the Corporation was authorized to repurchase up to
4.0 million
shares, or approximately
2.1%
of its outstanding shares, through
December 31, 2014
. As of September 30, 2014, 4.0 million shares were repurchased, completing this repurchase program. No stock repurchases were made outside the program and all repurchases were made in accordance with the guidelines of Rule 10b-18 and in compliance with Regulation M.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable.
Item 6. Exhibits
See Exhibit Index for a list of the exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K and filed as part of this report.
72
FULTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
FULTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Date:
November 5, 2014
/s/ E. Philip Wenger
E. Philip Wenger
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
Date:
November 5, 2014
/s/ Patrick S. Barrett
Patrick S. Barrett
Senior Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
73
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibits Required Pursuant
to Item 601 of Regulation S-K
3.1
Articles of Incorporation, as amended and restated, of Fulton Financial Corporation– Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Fulton Financial Corporation Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 24, 2011.
3.2
Bylaws of Fulton Financial Corporation as amended – Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Fulton Financial Corporation Current Report on an Amended Form 8-K dated September 23, 2014.
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101
Financial statements from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fulton Financial Corporation for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, filed on November 5, 2014, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - filed herewith.
74