Silicon Labs
SLAB
#2536
Rank
S$8.57 B
Marketcap
S$260.07
Share price
0.46%
Change (1 day)
53.97%
Change (1 year)

Silicon Labs - 10-Q quarterly report FY


Text size:
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

|X| QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2001
-------------------------------------------------

Or

|_| TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to
----------------------- ---------------------
Commission file number:
------------------------------------------------------

SILICON LABORATORIES INC.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware 74-2793174
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)

4635 Boston Lane, Austin, Texas 78735
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(512) 416-8500
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. |X| Yes |_| No

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and
reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan
confirmed by a court. |_| Yes |_| No

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes
of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. As of April 11, 2001,
48,352,176 shares of common stock of Silicon Laboratories Inc. were outstanding.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION NUMBER
------
<S> <C> <C>
Item 1 Financial Statements:

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2001 and
December 30, 2000 ........................................................ 2

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
three months ended March 31, 2001 and April 1, 2000....................... 3

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the
three months ended March 31, 2001 and April 1, 2000....................... 4

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements........................ 5

Item 2 Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations............................. 6

Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.................. 24

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1 Legal Proceedings........................................................... 24

Item 2 Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds................................... 24

Item 3 Defaults Upon Senior Securities............................................. 24

Item 4 Submission of Matter to a Vote of Securities Holders........................ 24

Item 5 Other Information........................................................... 24

Item 6 Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K............................................ 25
</TABLE>


1
PART I:    FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SILICON LABORATORIES INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 30,
2001 2000
----------- ------------
ASSETS (Unaudited)
<S> <C> <C>
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents.................... $ 67,454 $ 51,902
Short-term investments....................... 29,771 44,536
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for
doubtful accounts of $431 at March 31,
2001 and $758 at December 30, 2000......... 7,027 13,616
Inventories.................................. 7,887 7,219
Deferred income taxes........................ 1,926 1,719
Prepaid expenses and other................... 1,969 1,119
----------- ------------
Total current assets............................ 116,034 120,111
Property, equipment and software, net........... 21,865 22,625
Goodwill and other intangible assets............ 37,445 39,686
Other assets.................................... 2,497 2,418
----------- ------------
Total assets.................................... $177,841 $184,840
=========== ============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable............................. $ 5,546 $ 8,728
Accrued expenses............................. 2,740 2,406
Deferred revenue............................. 3,077 2,640
Current portion of long-term obligations..... 2,112 2,078
Income taxes payable......................... -- 912
----------- ------------
Total current liabilities....................... 13,475 16,764
Long-term debt and leases....................... 2,862 3,390
Other long-term obligations..................... 1,662 1,735
----------- ------------
Total liabilities............................... 17,999 21,889
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock--$.0001 par value;
250,000 shares authorized; 48,350 and
48,117 shares issued and outstanding at
March 31, 2001 and December 30, 2000,
respectively................................ 5 5
Additional paid-in capital.................... 165,631 165,404
Stockholder notes receivable.................. (1,202) (1,202)
Deferred stock compensation................... (19,809) (21,061)
Retained earnings............................. 15,217 19,805
----------- ------------
Total stockholders' equity...................... 159,842 162,951
----------- ------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity...... $177,841 $184,840
=========== ============
</TABLE>
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.


2
SILICON LABORATORIES INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED
------------------------------
MARCH 31, APRIL 1,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Revenues............................... $14,437 $19,687
Cost of revenues....................... 6,428 6,757
----------- -----------
Gross profit........................... 8,009 12,930
Operating expenses:
Research and development............ 6,508 3,580
Selling, general and administrative 4,090 3,218
Goodwill amortization............... 2,103 --
Amortization of deferred stock
compensation...................... 1,331 779
----------- -----------
Operating expenses..................... 14,032 7,577
----------- -----------
Operating income (loss)................ (6,023) 5,353
Other (income) and expenses:
Interest income..................... (1,039) (248)
Interest expense.................... 198 277
----------- -----------
Income (loss) before income taxes...... (5,182) 5,324
Provision (benefit) for income taxes... (594) 2,319
----------- -----------
Net income (loss) ..................... $(4,588) $ 3,005
=========== ===========
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic............................... $ (0.10) $ 0.14
Diluted............................. $ (0.10) $ 0.07
Weighted-average common shares
outstanding:
Basic............................... 45,367 21,221
Diluted............................. 45,367 45,952
</TABLE>

THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.


3
SILICON LABORATORIES INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED
------------------------------
MARCH 31, APRIL 1,
2001 2000
----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
OPERATING ACTIVITIES

Net income (loss)...................................... $ (4,588) $ 3,005
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization of property, equipment
and software....................................... 1,869 1,053
Amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets. 2,241 --
Amortization of deferred stock compensation.......... 1,331 779
Amortization of note/lease end-of-term interest
payments........................................... 81 80
Compensation expense related to stock options,
direct stock issuance, and warrants to
non-employees...................................... -- 153
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Investment interest receivable..................... 359 (187)
Accounts receivable................................ 6,589 230
Inventories........................................ (668) (4,623)
Prepaid expenses and other......................... (850) (147)
Other assets....................................... (8) 181
Accounts payable................................... (2,753) 3,460
Accrued expenses................................... 335 1,065
Deferred revenue................................... 437 (470)
Deferred income taxes.............................. (361) 33
Income taxes payable............................... (912) (338)
----------- -----------
Net cash provided by operating activities.............. 3,102 4,274

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

Purchases of short-term investments.................... (13,770) (25,060)
Maturities of short-term investments................... 28,176 4,891
Purchases of property, equipment and software.......... (1,110) (5,564)
Purchase of other assets............................... (500) --
----------- -----------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities.... 12,796 (25,733)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Proceeds from long-term debt........................... -- 3,536
Payments on long-term debt............................. (360) (527)
Payments on capital leases............................. (134) (122)
Proceeds from exercise of warrants..................... 100
Net proceeds from initial public offering.............. -- 90,954
Net proceeds from exercises of stock options........... 148 1,299
----------- -----------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities.... (346) 95,240
----------- -----------
Increase in cash and cash equivalents.................. 15,552 73,781
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period....... 51,902 8,197
----------- -----------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period............. $ 67,454 $81,978
=========== ===========
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest paid.......................................... $ 118 $ 198
=========== ===========
Income taxes paid...................................... $ 716 $ 2,416
=========== ===========
</TABLE>

THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.


4
SILICON LABORATORIES INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
MARCH 31, 2001

1. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein are
unaudited; however, they contain all normal recurring accruals and adjustments
which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the
consolidated financial position of Silicon Laboratories Inc. and its
subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") at March 31, 2001 and the
consolidated results of its operations and cash flows for the three months
ended March 31, 2001 and April 1, 2000. All intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated. The results of operations for the three
months ended March 31, 2001 are not necessarily indicative of the results to
be expected for the full year.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do
not include footnotes and certain financial presentations normally required
under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Therefore, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended
December 30, 2000, included in the Company's Form 10-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

INVENTORIES

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, determined using the first-in,
first-out method, or market. Inventories consist of the following (in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 30,
2001 2000
--------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C>
Work in progress $4,519 $4,302
Finished goods 3,368 2,917
--------------- ----------------
$7,887 $7,219
=============== ================
</TABLE>

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

In June 1997, the FASB issued SFAS No. 130, REPORTING COMPREHENSIVE INCOME,
which establishes standards for reporting and display of comprehensive income
and its components in the financial statements. There were no material
differences between net income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss) during
any of the periods presented.


5
SILICON LABORATORIES INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)

EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net
income (loss) per share (in thousands, except per share data):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended
---------------------------
March 31, April 1,
2001 2000
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Net income (loss)............................................ ($4,588) $ 3,005
Basic:
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding....... 48,289 31,737
Weighted-average shares of common stock subject to
repurchase.............................................. (2,922) (10,516)
------------ ------------
Shares used in computing basic net income (loss) per 45,367 21,221
share................................................... ------------ ------------

Effect of dilutive securities:
Weighted-average shares of common stock subject to
repurchase.............................................. -- 10,330
Convertible preferred stock and warrants.................. -- 12,606
Stock options............................................. -- 1,795
------------ ------------
Shares used in computing diluted net income (loss) per 45,367 45,952
share................................................... ============ ============

Basic net income (loss) per share............................ $ (0.10) $ 0.14
Diluted net income (loss) per share.......................... $ (0.10) $ 0.07
</TABLE>

2. SEGMENT REPORTING

The Company has one operating segment, integrated circuits (ICs), with three
product areas (the Wireline, Wireless, and Optical Networking Divisions). The
chief operating decision maker allocates resources and assesses performance of
the business and other activities at the operating segment level. The Wireline
Division accounted for a significant majority of the revenues in both periods
presented.

3. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company is involved in various legal proceedings that have arisen in the
normal course of business. While the ultimate results of these matters cannot be
predicted with certainty, management does not expect them to have a material
adverse effect on the consolidated financial position and results of operations.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS

THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES THERETO INCLUDED
ELSEWHERE IN THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND FORM 10-K FILED JANUARY
22, 2001. EXCEPT FOR THE HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN,
THE MATTERS DISCUSSED IN THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q MAY BE CONSIDERED
"FORWARD-LOOKING" STATEMENTS WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 27A OF THE
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, AND SECTION 21E OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED. SUCH STATEMENTS INCLUDE DECLARATIONS
REGARDING THE INTENT, BELIEF OR CURRENT EXPECTATIONS OF SILICON LABORATORIES
AND ITS MANAGEMENT AND MAY BE SIGNIFIED BY THE WORDS "EXPECTS,"
"ANTICIPATES," "INTENDS," "BELIEVES" OR SIMILAR LANGUAGE. PROSPECTIVE
INVESTORS ARE CAUTIONED THAT ANY SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE NOT
GUARANTEES OF FUTURE PERFORMANCE AND INVOLVE A NUMBER OF RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES. ACTUAL RESULTS COULD DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE INDICATED BY
SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. FACTORS THAT COULD CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE TO
SUCH DIFFERENCES INCLUDE THOSE DISCUSSED BELOW,

6
AS WELL AS THOSE DISCUSSED IN SILICON LABORATORIES' ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10-K FILED JANUARY 22, 2001. OUR FISCAL YEAR-END FINANCIAL REPORTING
PERIODS ARE A 52- OR 53- WEEK YEAR ENDING ON THE SATURDAY CLOSEST TO DECEMBER
31ST. OUR FIRST QUARTER OF FISCAL YEAR 2001 ENDED MARCH 31, 2001. OUR FIRST
QUARTER OF FISCAL YEAR 2000 ENDED APRIL 1, 2000. ALL OF THE QUARTERLY PERIODS
REPORTED IN THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q HAD THIRTEEN WEEKS.

OVERVIEW

We design and develop proprietary, analog-intensive, mixed-signal ICs for
the rapidly growing communications industry. Our innovative ICs can
dramatically reduce the cost, size and system power requirements of the
products that our customers sell to their end-user customers. We currently
offer ICs that can be incorporated into communications devices, such as
modems and wireless phones, as well as cable and satellite set-top boxes,
residential communication gateways for cable or DSL, cable modems and optical
networking equipment. Customers during fiscal 2000 included 3Com, Agere
Systems (formerly the Lucent Microelectronics business), Motorola, PC-TEL,
and Smart Link.

Our company was founded in 1996. Our business has grown rapidly since our
inception, as reflected by our employee headcount, which increased to 252
employees at March 31, 2001 from 148 at the end of fiscal 1999, 42 at the end
of fiscal 1998, and 17 at the end of fiscal 1997. As a "fabless"
semiconductor company, we rely on third-party semiconductor fabricators to
manufacture the silicon wafers that reflect our IC designs. Each wafer
contains numerous die, which are cut from the wafer to create a chip for an
IC. We also rely on third-party assemblers to assemble and package these die
prior to final product testing and shipping.

Our company is organized into three principal areas, the Wireline Products
Division, the Wireless Products Division, and the Optical Networking
Division. Our Wireline Products Division commenced research and development
for our first IC product, the direct access arrangement, or DAA, in October
1996. We introduced our DAA product in the first quarter of fiscal 1998, and
first received acceptance of this product for inclusion in a customer's
device, which we refer to as a "design win", in March 1998. The first
commercial shipment of our DAA product was made in April 1998. A significant
majority of our sales to date have been derived from sales of our various DAA
products and we expect to remain dependent on continued sales of DAA products
for a majority of our sales until we are able to diversify sales with new
products. In recent periods, we have expanded our product lines. For example,
the Wireline Products Division has introduced our ISOmodem product providing
a complete embedded modem solution for fast connection, low speed
applications and our ProSLIC product providing the telephone features at the
source end of the telephone for subscriber line interfaces in
voice-over-digital network applications. Our Wireless Products Division has
introduced RF synthesizer products serving GSM mobile telephone applications,
wideband CDMA applications and wireless local area network opportunities. Our
Optical Networking Products Division introduced a clock and data recovery
product suitable for SONET physical layer applications. We expect to be less
dependent on our DAA products for future sales to the extent that these
products, or other products that we may introduce, are incorporated into
devices sold by our customers.

Since our inception, a few customers have accounted for a substantial
portion of our revenues. During fiscal 2000, PC-TEL accounted for 46% of our
revenues. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of our revenues in
fiscal 2000. To date, a majority of our sales have been generated through our
direct sales force. In fiscal 1998, we began to establish a network of
independent sales representatives and distributors worldwide to support our
sales and marketing activities. We anticipate that revenues from these
representatives and distributors will increase as a percentage of our total
revenues in future periods. However, we expect to continue to experience
significant customer concentration in direct sales to key customer accounts
until we are able to diversify sales with new customers.

Over the past several months, many personal computer manufacturers have
announced cutbacks in their sales forecasts due to the rapid deterioration in
industry-wide demand, resulting in a major inventory correction. This
downturn has had a significant negative impact on our results for the quarter
ended March 31, 2001. We believe that this decrease in demand will also have
a sizable impact on our results from


7
operations, particularly within our Wireline Products Division for the year
ending December 29, 2001 and creates significant uncertainty in our business
planning for the remainder of the year.

The percentage of our revenues to customers located outside of the United
States was 21% in fiscal 2000, 7% in fiscal 1999 and was insignificant in
fiscal 1998. All of our revenues to date have been denominated in U.S.
dollars. We believe that the percentage of our revenues made to customers
outside of the United States will increase as our products receive greater
acceptance in international markets.

The sales cycle for the test and evaluation of our ICs can range from 1 to
12 months or more. An additional 3 to 6 months or more may be required before
a customer ships a significant volume of devices that incorporate our ICs. We
expect this sales cycle to lengthen as our customers experience a decrease in
demand for their products due to the ongoing economic downturn that is
particularly affecting technology companies. Due to this lengthy sales cycle,
we may experience a significant delay between incurring expenses for research
and development and selling, general and administrative efforts, and the
generation of corresponding revenues, if any. We intend to continue to increase
our investment in research and development, selling, general and
administrative functions and inventory as we expand our operations in the
future. Consequently, if revenues in any quarter do not occur when expected,
expenses and inventory levels could be disproportionately high, and our
operating results for that quarter and, potentially, future quarters would be
adversely affected.

Our limited operating history and rapid growth make it difficult for us to
assess the impact of seasonal factors on our business. Because many of our
ICs are designed for use in consumer products such as PCs and wireless
telephones, we expect that the demand for our products will be subject to
seasonal demand resulting in increased sales in the third and fourth quarters
of each year when customers place orders to meet holiday demand. We expect to
experience seasonal fluctuations in the demand for our products as customer
demand increases in greater volume across our product offerings.

The following describes the line items set forth in our consolidated
statements of operations:

REVENUES. Revenues are generated principally by sales of our ICs. We
recognize revenue upon the transfer of title, which generally occurs upon
shipment to our customers. Revenues are deferred on shipments to distributors
until they are resold by such distributors. Our products typically carry a
one-year replacement warranty. Our revenues are subject to variation from
period to period due to the volume of shipments made within a period and the
prices we charge for our products. The vast majority of our revenues were
negotiated at prices that reflect a discount from the list prices for our
products. These discounts are made for a variety of reasons, including to
establish a relationship with a new customer, as an incentive for customers
to purchase products in larger volumes or in response to competition. In
addition, as a product matures, we expect that the average selling price for
that product will decline. Therefore, our ability to increase revenues in the
future is dependent on increased demand for our established products and our
ability to ship larger volumes of products in response to such demand, as
well as customer acceptance of newly introduced products.

COST OF REVENUES. Cost of revenues includes the cost of purchasing
finished silicon wafers processed by independent foundries; costs associated
with assembly, test and shipping of those products; costs of personnel and
equipment associated with manufacturing support, logistics and quality
assurance; an allocated portion of our occupancy costs; and allocable
depreciation of testing equipment and leasehold improvements. Generally, we
depreciate equipment over four years on a straight line basis. We also
depreciate our leasehold improvements over the applicable lease term.
Recently introduced products tend to have higher cost of revenues per unit
due to initially low production volumes required by our customers and higher
costs associated with new package variations. Generally, as production
volumes for a product increase, unit production costs tend to decrease as our
semiconductor fabricators and assemblers achieve greater economies of scale
for that product. Additionally, the cost of wafer procurement, which is a
significant component of cost of goods sold, varies cyclically with overall
demand for semiconductors.


8
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. Research and development expense consists
primarily of compensation and related costs of employees engaged in research
and development activities, as well as an allocated portion of our occupancy
costs for such operations. We depreciate our research and development
equipment over four years and amortize our purchased software from
computer-aided design tool vendors over four years. Development activities
include the creation of test methodologies to assure compliance with required
specifications and design of new products.

SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. Selling, general and administrative
expense consists primarily of personnel-related expenses, related allocable
portion of our occupancy costs, sales commissions to independent sales
representatives, professional fees, directors and officers liability
insurance, other promotional and marketing expenses and reserves for bad
debt. Write-offs of uncollectible accounts have been insignificant to date.

GOODWILL AMORTIZATION. Goodwill amortization includes the amortization of
goodwill purchased in connection with the acquisition of Krypton Isolation,
Inc. and SNR Semiconductor Incorporated. Goodwill is amortized over four to
seven years using the straight line method.

AMORTIZATION OF DEFERRED STOCK COMPENSATION. In connection with the grant
of stock options and direct issuances of stock to our employees, we recorded
deferred stock compensation, representing, for accounting purposes, the
difference between the exercise price of option grants, or the issuance price
of direct issuances of stock, and the deemed fair value of our common stock
at the time of such grants or issuances. The deferred stock compensation is
amortized over the vesting period of the applicable options or shares,
generally five to eight years. The amortization of deferred stock
compensation is recorded as an operating expense.

INTEREST INCOME. Interest income reflects interest earned on average cash,
cash equivalents and investment balances.

INTEREST EXPENSE. Interest expense consists of interest on our long-term
debt and capital lease obligations.

PROVISION (BENEFIT) FOR INCOME TAXES. We accrue a provision (benefit) for
federal and state income tax at the applicable statutory rates.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table sets forth our statement of operations data as a
percentage of revenues for the periods indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED
----------------------------
MARCH 31, APRIL 1,
2001 2000
----------------------------
(Unaudited)
<S> <C> <C>
Revenues........................................................... 100.0% 100.0%
Cost of revenues................................................... 44.5 34.3
-------------- ------------
Gross profit....................................................... 55.5 65.7

Operating expenses:
Research and development......................................... 45.1 18.2
Selling, general and administrative.............................. 28.3 16.3
Goodwill amortization............................................ 14.6 --
Amortization of deferred stock compensation...................... 9.2 4.0
-------------- ------------
Operating expenses................................................. 97.2 38.5

Operating income (loss)............................................ (41.7) 27.2

Other (income) and expenses:
Interest income.................................................. (7.2) (1.2)
Interest expense................................................. 1.4 1.4
-------------- ------------
Income (loss) before income taxes.................................. (35.9) 27.0
Provision (benefit) for income taxes............................... (4.1) 11.7
-------------- ------------
Net income (loss).................................................. (31.8)% 15.3%
============== ============
</TABLE>


9
COMPARISON OF THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2001 TO THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
APRIL 1, 2000.

REVENUES. Revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2001 were $14.4
million, a decrease of $5.2 million or 26.9% from revenues of $19.7 million
in the three months ended April 1, 2000. The decrease was primarily due to a
decline in the sales volume of our DAA family of products reflecting the
rapid deterioration in demand within the personal computer industry. Revenues
from non-DAA products, such as the ISOmodem, the ProSLIC and the RF
Synthesizer, accounted for approximately 32.5% of revenues for the quarter
ended March 31, 2001. The decrease in our DAA revenues and the increase in
our non-DAA revenues combined to reduce our product concentration in DAA
products.

GROSS PROFIT. Gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2001 was
$8.0 million or 55.5% of revenues, a decrease of $4.9 million as compared
with gross profit of $12.9 million or 65.7% of revenues in the three months
ended April 1, 2000. The decrease in gross profit was primarily due to the
substantial decrease in sales volume, decreased utilization of our testing
capacity and reserves for excess inventory due to sharp reductions in demand
for our personal computer-related DAA products. These decreases in gross
margins were partially offset by a vendor credit received for yield
variations outside processing parameters. The future direction of gross
margins is uncertain due to many factors such as the severity and duration of
the personal computer industry downturn, our ability to sell existing
inventory on hand, our ability to successfully sell and to introduce to
market new products, the extent to which our competitors introduce new
products to market, and future product cost considerations with our vendors.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. Research and development expense for the three
months ended March 31, 2001 was $6.5 million or 45.1% of revenues, which
reflected an increase of $2.9 million or 80.6% as compared with research and
development expense of $3.6 million or 18.2% of revenues for the three months
ended April 1, 2000. The increase in the dollar amount of research and
development expense was principally due to continued product development
activities, significant increases in new product development initiatives in
wireless and optical networking opportunities, and increased spending to
develop test methodologies for new products. As a percentage of revenues,
research and development expenses increased significantly due to the
substantial decrease in sales volume for the three months ended March 31,
2001. We expect that research and development expense will continue to
increase in absolute dollars in future periods as we develop new ICs, and may
fluctuate as a percentage of revenues due to changes in sales volume and new
product development initiatives.

SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. Selling, general and administrative
expense increased $0.9 million or 28.1%, to $4.1 million in the quarter ended
March 31, 2001 from $3.2 million in the quarter ended April 1, 2000, and
represented 28.3% of revenues in the quarter ended March 31, 2001 and 16.3%
of revenues in the quarter ended April 1, 2000. The increase in the dollar
amount of selling, general and administrative expense was principally
attributable to increased staffing, but was partially offset by a decrease in
spending on patent litigation fees. We expect that selling, general and
administrative expense will increase in absolute dollars in future periods as
we expand our sales channels, marketing efforts and administrative
infrastructure. In addition, we expect selling, general and administrative
expense to fluctuate as a percentage of revenues because of (1) the
likelihood that indirect distribution channels, which entail the payment of
commissions, will account for a larger portion of our revenues in future
periods and, therefore, increase our selling, general and administrative
expense relative to a direct sales force performing at satisfactory levels of
productivity; (2) fluctuating usage of advertising to promote our products
and, in particular, our newly introduced products; and (3) potential
significant variability in our future sales volume.

GOODWILL AMORTIZATION. Goodwill amortization for the three months ended
March 31, 2001 was $2.1 million as a result of the acquisitions of Krypton
Isolation, Inc. and SNR Semiconductor Incorporated during the second half of
fiscal 2000.

AMORTIZATION OF DEFERRED STOCK COMPENSATION. We have recorded deferred
stock compensation for the difference between the exercise price of option
grants or the


10
issuance price of direct issuances of stock, and the deemed fair value of our
common stock at the time of such grants or issuances. We are amortizing this
amount over the vesting periods of the applicable options or restricted
stock, which resulted in amortization expense of $1.3 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2001 as compared to $0.8 million for the three months
ended April 1, 2000. The increase in the dollar amount of amortization of
deferred stock compensation was due to an increase in deferred stock
compensation for options and restricted stock issued subsequent to the first
quarter of fiscal 2000.

INTEREST INCOME. Interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2001
was $1.0 million as compared to $0.2 million for the three months ended April
1, 2000. This increase was primarily due to the investment of the net
proceeds from our initial public offering of our common stock, which were
received on March 29, 2000.

INTEREST EXPENSE. Interest expense for the three months ended March 31,
2001 was $0.2 million as compared to $0.3 million for the three months ended
April 1, 2000. The decrease in interest expense was primarily due to lower
levels of debt during the recent quarter.

PROVISION (BENEFIT) FOR INCOME TAXES. Our effective tax rate, excluding the
impact of non-deductible amortization of goodwill and deferred stock
compensation, was 34.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2001 as compared
to 38.0% in the three months ended April 1, 2000. The change in our rate was
primarily due to tax advantaged investment income from the investment of the
proceeds from our initial public offering.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our principal sources of liquidity as of March 31, 2001 consisted of $97.2
million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments and our bank
credit facilities. Our bank credit facilities include a revolving line of
credit available for borrowings and letters of credit of up to the lesser of
$5.0 million or 80.0% of eligible accounts receivable at the bank's prime
lending rate. At March 31, 2001, a letter of credit for $0.5 million related
to a building lease was outstanding under the revolving line of credit and
$2.2 million was available for new borrowings based on the 80% of eligible
accounts receivable limitation.

We also have entered into agreements with three institutional lenders for
equipment financing to purchase or lease equipment, leasehold improvements
and software. At March 31, 2001, the amount outstanding under these
agreements was $5.0 million. This indebtedness bears effective interest rates
(including end-of-term interest payments of $1.3 million) ranging from 12.5%
to 14.6% per annum, is secured by certain equipment, and is repayable over
approximately the next three years.

During the three months ended March 31, 2001, cash provided by operating
activities was $3.1 million as compared to cash provided by operating
activities of $4.3 million during the three months ended April 1, 2000.

Due to the nature of our business, we experience working capital needs in
the areas of accounts receivable and inventory. Typically, we bill our
customers on an open account basis on net 30 day payment terms or other
specific terms and conditions that may vary from account to account as
individually negotiated with customers. As of March 31, 2001, we had an
accounts receivable balance of $7.0 million. If sales levels were to
increase, it is likely that the level of receivables would also increase. In
the event that customers delayed their payments to us, the levels of accounts
receivable would also increase. In the area of inventory, we find that in
order to maintain an adequate supply of product for our customers, we must
carry a certain level of inventory. This inventory level may vary based
principally upon either orders received from customers or our forecast of
demand for these products. Other considerations in determining inventory
levels may include the product life cycle stage of our products and
competitive situations in the marketplace. Such considerations are balanced
against risk of obsolescence or potentially excess inventory levels. The
sharp downturn in demand for our personal computer-related DAA products
caused us to take reserves for excess inventory


11
levels. As of March 31, 2001, we had inventory of $7.9 million which we
deemed adequate to address these inventory considerations.

Capital expenditures decreased by $4.5 million to $1.1 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2001 from $5.6 million for the three months ended
April 1, 2000. This decrease in dollar amount was due to the substantial
completion of our internal test floor for existing products in fiscal 2000.
The expenditures in the recent quarter were incurred to purchase semiconductor
test equipment, design software and engineering tools, other computer
equipment, leasehold improvements and software to support our business
capabilities. We anticipate capital expenditures of approximately $7.0 million
for fiscal 2001 primarily to fund additional test floor operations
capabilities for wireless and optical networking new products and expand
engineering new product development activities.

Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including the
rate of sales growth, market acceptance of our products, the timing and
extent of research and development projects and the expansion of our sales
and marketing activities. We believe our existing cash balances and credit
facilities are sufficient to meet our capital requirements through at least
the next 12 months, although we could be required, or could elect, to seek
additional funding prior to that time. We may enter into acquisitions or
strategic arrangements in the future which also could require us to seek
additional equity or debt financing. There can be no assurances that
additional equity or debt financing, if required, will be available to us on
acceptable terms or at all.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In June 1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133, ACCOUNTING FOR DERIVATIVE
INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES. SFAS No. 133 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after June 15, 2000. SFAS No. 133 requires that all
derivative instruments be recorded on the balance sheet at their fair value.
Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded each period in current
earnings or other comprehensive income. The adoption of SFAS No. 133 as
amended by SFAS No. 138, ACCOUNTING FOR CERTAIN INSTRUMENTS AND CERTAIN
HEDGING ACTIVITIES, did not have a material impact on our financial
statements since the Company does not utilize derivative instruments.

QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our interest income is sensitive to changes in the general level of U.S.
interest rates, particularly since the majority of our investments are in
short-term instruments. Due to the nature of our short-term investments, we
have concluded that there is no material market risk exposure.

FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE OPERATING RESULTS

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

IF WE ARE UNABLE TO DEVELOP NEW AND ENHANCED PRODUCTS THAT ACHIEVE MARKET
ACCEPTANCE IN A TIMELY MANNER, OUR OPERATING RESULTS AND COMPETITIVE POSITION
COULD BE HARMED

Our future success will depend on our ability to reduce our dependence on
our DAA products by developing new ICs and product enhancements that achieve
market acceptance in a timely and cost-effective manner. The development of
mixed-signal integrated circuits (ICs) is highly complex, and we occasionally
have experienced delays in completing the development and introduction of new
products and product


12
enhancements. Successful product development and market acceptance of our
products depend on a number of factors, including:

o changing requirements of customers within the wireline,
wireless communications and optical networking markets;

o accurate prediction of market requirements;

o timely completion and introduction of new designs;

o timely qualification and certification of our ICs for use in
our customers' products;

o commercial acceptance and volume production of the products
into which our ICs will be incorporated;

o availability of foundry and assembly capacity;

o achievement of high manufacturing yields;

o quality, price, performance, power use and size of our
products;

o availability, quality, price and performance of competing
products and technologies;

o our customer service and support capabilities and
responsiveness;

o successful development of our relationships with existing and
potential customers; and

o changes in technology, industry standards or end-user
preferences.

We cannot provide any assurance that new products which we recently have
developed or may develop in the future will achieve market acceptance. We
have introduced to market or are in development of many new ICs including:

o an AeroTM GSM transceiver chipset, providing a highly
integrated radio communication section of a GSM wireless
handset with versatile interfaces to other electronic
sections of the handset;

o a family of RF synthesizers, which are used to generate high
frequency signals that are used in wireless communications
systems to select a particular radio channel;

o an ISOmodem, which is a miniaturized modem that can be
embedded in electronic devices with low transmission
requirements, such as credit card verification devices, to
provide quick network access;

o a higher speed ISOmodem product to serve additional embedded
modem markets demanding faster transmission requirements such
as next generation set-top boxes;

o a ProSLIC product, which provides dial tone, busy tone, caller
ID and ring signal functions at the source end of the
telephone;

o a family of optical networking products, which feature highly
integrated physical layer circuits designed for SONET/ATM
routers, multiplexers, digital cross connects and optical
transceiver modules; and

o a Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) Analog Front End providing a
highly integrated interface for DSL modems with legacy support
for traditional analog phone line functionality.

We also are actively developing other ICs. If our recently introduced or
other ICs fail to achieve market acceptance, our operating results and
competitive position could be adversely affected.


13
WE DEPEND ON A LIMITED NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS FOR A SUBSTANTIAL PORTION OF OUR
REVENUES, AND THE LOSS OF, OR A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN ORDERS FROM, ANY KEY
CUSTOMER COULD SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE OUR REVENUES

In fiscal 2000, PC-TEL accounted for 46% of our revenues. Many markets for
our products are dominated by a small number of potential customers. Our
operating results in the foreseeable future will continue to depend on sales
to a relatively small number of customers, as well as the ability of these
customers to sell products that use our IC products. In the future, these
customers may decide not to purchase our ICs at all, purchase fewer ICs than
they did in the past or alter their purchasing patterns, particularly because:

o we do not have any material long-term purchase arrangements
with these or any of our other customers;

o substantially all of our sales to date have been made on a
purchase order basis, which permits our customers to cancel,
change or delay product purchase commitments with little or no
notice to us and without penalty; and

o some of our customers have sought or are seeking relationships
with current or potential competitors which may affect our
customers' purchasing decisions.

Our largest customer, PC-TEL, experienced a sequential decline in overall
quarterly revenues of 42.2% for their quarter ended December 31, 2000 which
resulted in a net loss for the quarterly period. For the quarter ended
March 31, 2001 PC-TEL's reported revenues remained at the reduced level
experienced in their quarter ended December 31, 2000 and they reported a
larger net loss. If PC-TEL's revenues decline or remain at these reduced levels,
we believe that our results of operations, particularly in the Wireline
Products Division will be significantly and adversely affected.

On October 17, 2000, PC-TEL announced that the U.S. International Trade
Commission (ITC) voted to investigate trade practices involving certain host
signal processing modems, also known as soft modems, arising from a complaint
filed by PC-TEL alleging that Smart Link's solutions infringe PC-TEL's
patents. Both PC-TEL and Smart Link are significant customers for us. Should
our two customers fail to settle their dispute, the ITC could take action
that could result in the loss of sales by us to Smart Link, disruption of our
ongoing supply relationships and obsolescence of inventory specifically
manufactured for Smart Link. Should our two customers arrive at a settlement
that would increase our revenue concentration from PC-TEL, we would
anticipate that it may result in our revenues, gross profit, gross margin
percentage and net income decreasing reflecting PC-TEL's increased ability to
negotiate lower prices due to higher sales volume and favorable negotiating
position.

While we have been the sole supplier of the direct access arrangement, or
DAA, IC used in PC-TEL's products, we anticipate that PC-TEL would consider
alternative sources in the future in order to diversify its supplier base
which would increase its negotiating leverage with us and protect its ability
to secure DAA components. We have a volume purchase agreement with PC-TEL,
but the agreement does not require PC-TEL to purchase any minimum number of
units from us during fiscal 2001. We believe that any second source of DAA
ICs for PC-TEL could have an adverse effect on the prices we are able to
charge PC-TEL and the volume of DAA ICs that we sell to PC-TEL, which would
negatively affect our revenues and operating results.

The loss of any of our key customers, or a significant reduction in sales
to any one of them, would significantly reduce our revenues and adversely
affect our business.

14
WE HAVE DEPENDED ON OUR DAA FAMILY OF PRODUCTS FOR A SIGNIFICANT MAJORITY OF
OUR REVENUES TO DATE, AND SUBSTANTIAL REDUCTIONS IN ORDERS FOR DAA PRODUCTS
WOULD SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE OUR REVENUES

A significant majority of our sales to date have been derived from sales
of our DAA family of ICs. This product family, in turn, is highly dependent
on sales to the personal computer industry which currently faces
deteriorating levels of demand. Until we are able to diversify our sales
through the introduction of new products, we will continue to rely on sales
of our DAA products. A continuing decline in overall demand for personal
computers, reduced market acceptance of our DAA products or the introduction
of products with superior price/performance characteristics by our
competitors could significantly reduce our sales. In addition, substantially
all of our DAA products that we have sold include technology related to one
or more of our issued U.S. patents. If these patents are found to be invalid
or unenforceable, our competitors could introduce competitive products that
could reduce both the volume and price per unit of our products.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2001, we experienced a significant
reduction in orders for our DAA family of products as a result of the recent
deterioration in demand for personal computers. Our revenues for the three
months ended March 31, 2001 declined sequentially from the three months ended
December 31, 2000 by 51.5%, which resulted in a significant reduction in gross
profits, a lower gross margin and a net loss for the quarterly period.

WE MAY EXPERIENCE SIGNIFICANT PERIOD-TO-PERIOD QUARTERLY AND ANNUAL
FLUCTUATIONS IN OUR REVENUES AND OPERATING RESULTS, WHICH MAY RESULT IN
VOLATILITY IN OUR STOCK PRICE

We may experience significant period-to-period fluctuations in our revenues
and operating results in the future due to a number of factors, and any such
variations may cause our stock price to fluctuate. It is likely that in some
future period our operating results will be below the expectations of public
market analysts or investors. If this occurs, our stock price may drop,
perhaps significantly. A number of factors, in addition to those cited in
other risk factors applicable to our business, may contribute to fluctuations
in our revenues and operating results, including:

o the timing and volume of orders from our customers;

o the rate of acceptance of our products by our customers,
including the acceptance of new products we may develop for
integration in the products manufactured by such customers,
which we refer to as "design wins";

o the time lag between "design wins" and production orders;

o the demand for and life cycles of the products incorporating
our ICs;

o the rate of adoption of mixed-signal ICs in the markets we
target;

o deferrals of customer orders in anticipation of new products
or product enhancements from us or our competitors or other
providers of ICs;

o changes in product mix; and

o the rate at which new markets emerge for products we are
currently developing or for which our design expertise can be
utilized to develop products for these new markets.

For example, the personal computer modem market is characterized by rapid
fluctuations in demand which results in corresponding fluctuations in the
demand for our DAA products that are incorporated in personal computer
modems. Additionally, the rate of technology acceptance by our customers
results in fluctuating demand for our products as customers are reluctant to
incorporate a new IC into their products until the new IC has achieved market
acceptance. However, once a new IC achieves market acceptance, demand for the
new IC can quickly accelerate and demand can quickly decline for the product
that the new IC replaces.

15
DUE TO OUR LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY, WE MAY HAVE DIFFICULTY BOTH IN
ACCURATELY PREDICTING OUR FUTURE REVENUES AND APPROPRIATELY BUDGETING FOR OUR
EXPENSES

We were incorporated in 1996 and did not begin generating revenues until
the second quarter of 1998. As a result, we have only a short history from
which to predict future revenues. This limited operating experience combined
with the rapidly evolving nature of the markets in which we sell our products,
as well as other factors which are beyond our control, reduce our ability to
accurately forecast quarterly or annual revenues. Additionally, because most
of our expenses are fixed in the short term or incurred in advance of
anticipated revenues, we may not be able to decrease our expenses in a timely
manner to offset any shortfall of revenues. During fiscal year 2000, we
expanded our staffing and increased our expense levels in anticipation of
future sales growth. If our sales do not increase, we expect to incur
significant losses, due to our higher expense levels.

WE DEPEND ON OUR CUSTOMERS TO SUPPORT OUR PRODUCTS

Our products are currently used by our customers to produce modems for
personal computers, wireless telephones and optical networking equipment. We
rely on our customers to provide hardware, software and other technical
support for the devices that use our products. If our customers do not provide
the required functionality or if our customers do not provide satisfactory
support for their products, the demand for these devices that incorporate our
products may diminish. Any reduction in the demand for these devices would
significantly reduce our revenues.

WE RELY ON THIRD PARTIES TO MANUFACTURE AND ASSEMBLE OUR PRODUCTS AND THE
FAILURE TO SUCCESSFULLY MANAGE OUR RELATIONSHIPS WITH OUR MANUFACTURERS AND
ASSEMBLERS WOULD NEGATIVELY IMPACT OUR ABILITY TO SELL OUR PRODUCTS

We do not have our own manufacturing facilities. Therefore, we must rely
on third-party vendors to manufacture the ICs we design. We also currently
rely on two third-party assembly contractors, Advanced Semiconductor
Engineering and Amkor, to assemble and package the silicon chips provided by
the wafers for use in final products. Additionally, we rely on third-party
vendors for a minor portion of the testing requirements of our products prior
to shipping.

There are significant risks associated with relying on these third-party
contractors, including:

o failure by us, our customers or their end customers to qualify
a selected supplier;

o capacity shortages during periods of high demand;

o reduced control over delivery schedules and quality;

o limited warranties on wafers or products supplied to us; and

o potential increases in prices.

We currently do not have long-term supply contracts with any of our
third-party vendors, and therefore, they are not obligated to perform
services or supply products to us for any specific period, or in any specific
quantities, except as may be provided in a particular purchase order.
Although we believe that other semiconductor foundries or assembly
contractors can adequately address our needs, we expect that it would take
approximately two to nine months to transition performance of these services
from our current providers to new providers. Such a transition may also
require a qualification process by our customers or their end customers. We
generally place orders for products with some of our suppliers approximately
four months prior to the anticipated delivery date, with order volumes based
on our forecasts of demand from our customers. Accordingly, if we
inaccurately forecast demand for our products, we may be unable to obtain
adequate foundry or assembly capacity from our third-party contractors to
meet our customers' delivery requirements, or we may accumulate excess
inventories. On occasion, we have been unable to adequately respond to
unexpected increases in customer purchase orders, and therefore, were unable
to benefit from this incremental demand. None of our third-party foundry or
assembly contractors have provided assurances to us that adequate capacity
will be available to us within the time required to meet additional demand
for our products.


16
From our inception through fiscal 2001, substantially all of the silicon
wafers for the products that we shipped were manufactured either by Taiwan
Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. or Vanguard International Semiconductor, an
affiliate of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Our customers typically
complete their own qualification process. If we fail to balance customer
demand across semiconductor fabrications properly, we might not be able to
fulfill demand for our products, which would adversely affect our operating
results. Additionally, a resulting write-off of unusable or excess
inventories would contribute to a decline in earnings.

THE SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING PROCESS IS HIGHLY COMPLEX AND, FROM TIME TO
TIME, MANUFACTURING YIELDS MAY FALL BELOW OUR EXPECTATIONS WHICH COULD RESULT
IN OUR INABILITY TO TIMELY SATISFY DEMAND FOR OUR PRODUCTS.

The manufacture of silicon wafers for our products is a highly complex and
technologically demanding process. Although we work closely with our
foundries to minimize the likelihood of reduced manufacturing yields, our
foundries from time to time have experienced lower than anticipated
manufacturing yields. Changes in manufacturing processes or the inadvertent
use of defective or contaminated materials by our foundries could result in
lower than anticipated manufacturing yields or unacceptable performance
deficiencies. If our foundries fail to deliver fabricated silicon wafers of
satisfactory quality in a timely manner, we will be unable to meet our
customers' demand for our products in a timely manner, which would adversely
affect our operating results and damage our customer relationships.

ANY ACQUISITIONS WE MAKE COULD DISRUPT OUR BUSINESS AND HARM OUR FINANCIAL
CONDITION

As part of our growth strategy, we will continue to evaluate opportunities
to acquire other businesses or technologies that would complement our current
offerings, expand the breadth of our markets or enhance our technical
capabilities. These acquisitions and any other potential future acquisitions
entail a number of risks that could materially and adversely affect our
business and operating results, including:

o problems integrating the acquired operations, technologies or
products with our existing business and products;

o diversion of management's time and attention from our core
business;

o difficulties in retaining business relationships with
suppliers and customers of the acquired company;

o risks associated with entering markets in which we lack prior
experience; and

o potential loss of key employees of the acquired company.

OUR CURRENT MANUFACTURERS AND ASSEMBLERS ARE CONCENTRATED IN THE SAME GEOGRAPHIC
REGION WHICH INCREASES THE RISK THAT A NATURAL DISASTER, LABOR STRIKE, WAR OR
POLITICAL UNREST COULD DISRUPT OUR OPERATIONS

Our current semiconductor manufacturers are located in the same region
within Taiwan and our assembly contractors are located in the Pacific Rim
region. The risk of earthquakes in Taiwan and the Pacific Rim region is
significant due to the proximity of major earthquake fault lines in the area.
We are not currently covered by insurance against business disruption caused
by earthquakes as such insurance is not currently available on terms that we
believe are commercially reasonable. Earthquakes, fire, flooding or other
natural disasters in Taiwan or the Pacific Rim region, or political unrest,
war, labor strikes or work stoppages in countries where our semiconductor
manufacturers' and assemblers' facilities are located, likely would result in
the disruption of our foundry or assembly capacity. Any disruption resulting
from these events could cause significant delays in shipments of our products
until we are able to shift our manufacturing or assembling from the affected
contractor to another third-party vendor. There can be no assurance that such
alternate capacity could be obtained on favorable terms, if at all.


17
WE ARE SUBJECT TO INCREASED INVENTORY RISKS AND COSTS BECAUSE WE BUILD OUR
PRODUCTS BASED ON FORECASTS PROVIDED BY CUSTOMERS BEFORE RECEIVING PURCHASE
ORDERS FOR THE PRODUCTS

In order to assure availability of our products for some of our largest
customers, we start the manufacturing of our products in advance of receiving
purchase orders based on forecasts provided by these customers. However,
these forecasts do not represent binding purchase commitments and we do not
recognize sales for these products until they are shipped to the customer. As
a result, we incur inventory and manufacturing costs in advance of
anticipated sales. Because demand for our products may not materialize,
manufacturing based on forecasts subjects us to increased risks of high
inventory carrying costs and increased obsolescence and may increase our
operating costs.

WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO MAINTAIN OUR HISTORICAL GROWTH RATE

Although we have experienced revenue and earnings growth in prior annual
periods, we may not be able to sustain these growth rates. For the three
months ended March 31, 2001, we reported a sequential decline of our overall
quarterly revenues from the three months ended December 30, 2000 by 51.5%
which resulted in a significant reduction in gross profits, gross margin
percentage and a net loss for the quarterly period. In particular, we may gain
significant market share in a relatively short period of time following the
introduction of a new product, resulting in revenue growth. However,
incremental gains in market share for these newly introduced products may not
occur. Additionally, the time lag by a customer from purchase of initial
orders of our product to follow on production volume orders may extend several
quarterly periods. Accordingly, you should not rely on the results of any
prior quarterly or annual periods as an indication of our future operating
performance.

WE ARE A RELATIVELY SMALL COMPANY WITH LIMITED RESOURCES COMPARED TO SOME OF
OUR CURRENT AND POTENTIAL COMPETITORS AND WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO COMPETE
EFFECTIVELY AND INCREASE MARKET SHARE

Some of our current and potential competitors have longer operating
histories, significantly greater resources and name recognition and a larger
base of customers than we have. As a result, these competitors may have
greater credibility with our existing and potential customers. They also may
be able to adopt more aggressive pricing policies and devote greater
resources to the development, promotion and sale of their products than we
can to ours. In addition, some of our current and potential competitors have
already established supplier or joint development relationships with the
decision makers at our current or potential customers. These competitors may
be able to leverage their existing relationships to discourage their
customers from purchasing products from us or persuade them to replace our
products with their products. Our competitors may also offer bundled chipset
kit arrangements offering a more complete product despite the technical
merits or advantages of our products. These competitors may elect not to
support our products which could complicate our sales efforts.

In addition, our largest competitors may restructure their operations to
create separate companies that are more focused on providing the types of
products we produce. For example, Rockwell's restructuring led to the
creation of Conexant which is a significant competitor. Additionally, Siemens
spun off its semiconductor business to create a more focused company named
Infineon Technologies. In July 2000, Lucent Technologies completed its plans
to spin off its microelectronics business with includes the optoelectronics
components and integrated circuits division, into a separate company named
Agere Systems in order to accelerate the growth of the business and alleviate
strategic conflicts with Lucent's competitors. Increased competition could
decrease our prices, reduce our sales, lower our margins or decrease our
market share. These and other competitive pressures may prevent us from
competing successfully against current or future competitors, and may
materially harm our business.


18
WE DEPEND ON OUR KEY PERSONNEL TO MANAGE OUR BUSINESS EFFECTIVELY IN A
RAPIDLY CHANGING MARKET, AND IF WE ARE UNABLE TO RETAIN OUR CURRENT PERSONNEL
AND HIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL, OUR ABILITY TO DEVELOP AND SUCCESSFULLY MARKET
OUR PRODUCTS COULD BE HARMED

We believe our future success will depend in large part upon our ability
to attract and retain highly skilled managerial, engineering, sales and
marketing personnel. Specifically, we believe that our future success is
highly dependent on Navdeep Sooch, our co-founder, Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of the Board, Jeffrey Scott, our co-founder and Vice President
of Engineering, and David Welland, our co-founder and Vice President of
Technology. There is currently a shortage of qualified personnel with
significant experience in the design, development, manufacturing, marketing
and sales of analog and mixed-signal communications ICs. In particular, there
is a shortage of engineers who are familiar with the intricacies of the
design and manufacturability of analog elements, and competition for such
personnel is intense. Our key technical personnel represent a significant
asset and serve as the source of our technological and product innovations.
We may not be successful in attracting and retaining sufficient numbers of
technical personnel to support our anticipated growth. The loss of any of our
key employees or the inability to attract or retain qualified personnel,
including engineers and sales and marketing personnel, could delay the
development and introduction of, and negatively impact our ability to sell,
our products.

OUR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS ARE FOCUSED ON A LIMITED NUMBER OF NEW
TECHNOLOGIES AND PRODUCTS, AND ANY DELAY IN THE DEVELOPMENT, OR ABANDONMENT,
OF THESE TECHNOLOGIES OR PRODUCTS BY INDUSTRY PARTICIPANTS, OR THEIR FAILURE
TO ACHIEVE MARKET ACCEPTANCE, COULD COMPROMISE OUR COMPETITIVE POSITION

Our ICs are used as components in communications devices in the wireline,
wireless and optical networking markets. As a result, we have devoted and
expect to continue to devote a large amount of resources to develop products
based on new and emerging technologies and standards that will be
commercially introduced in the future. In the first three months of fiscal
2001, our research and development expense was $6.5 million, which
represented 45.1% of our revenues compared to $3.6 million, or 18.2% of our
revenues for the first three months of fiscal 2000. A number of large
companies in the wireline, wireless and optical networking industries are
actively involved in the development of these new technologies and standards.
Should any of these companies delay or abandon their efforts to develop
commercially available products based on new technologies and standards, our
research and development efforts with respect to these technologies and
standards likely would have no appreciable value. In addition, if we do not
correctly anticipate new technologies and standards, or if the products that
we develop based on these new technologies and standards fail to achieve
market acceptance, our competitors may be better able to address market
demand than would we. Furthermore, if markets for these new technologies and
standards develop later than we anticipate, or do not develop at all, demand
for our products that are currently in development would suffer, resulting in
lower sales of these products than we currently anticipate. We have
introduced to market a RF synthesizer product for use in wireless phones
operating on the Global System for Mobile Communications, or GSM, standard.
The RF synthesizer is also compatible with General Packet Radio Service,
which is the emerging data communications protocol for GSM based wireless
phones. We cannot be certain whether manufacturers of wireless phones using
these standards will incorporate our RF synthesizer or that these standards
will not change, thereby making our products unsuitable or impractical. In
the area of Optical Networking, our recently introduced clock and data
recovery integrated circuit operates within stringent specifications for high
speed communications systems known as SONET. Changes to this standard could
make our products uncompetitive or unsuitable to changing system requirements
and result in the inability to sell these products.

OUR PRODUCTS ARE COMPLEX AND MAY REQUIRE MODIFICATIONS TO RESOLVE UNDETECTED
ERRORS WHICH COULD LEAD TO AN INCREASE IN OUR COSTS OR A REDUCTION IN OUR
REVENUES

Our products are complex and may contain errors when first introduced or as
new versions are released. We rely primarily on our in-house testing personnel
to design test operations and procedures to detect any errors prior to delivery
of our products to our customers. Because our products are manufactured by third
parties, should problems occur in the operation or performance of our ICs, we
may experience


19
delays in meeting key introduction dates or scheduled delivery dates to our
customers. These errors also could cause us to incur significant
re-engineering costs, divert the attention of our engineering personnel from
our product development efforts and cause significant customer relations and
business reputation problems.

THE PERFORMANCE OF OUR DIRECT ACCESS ARRANGEMENT PRODUCTS MAY BE ADVERSELY
AFFECTED BY SEVERE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS THAT MAY REQUIRE MODIFICATIONS,
WHICH COULD LEAD TO AN INCREASE IN OUR COSTS OR A REDUCTION IN OUR REVENUES

Although our DAA products are compliant with published specifications,
these established specifications might not adequately address all conditions
that must be satisfied in order to operate in harsh environments. This
includes environments where there are wide variations in electrical quality,
telephone line quality, static electricity and operating temperatures or that
may be affected by lightning or improper handling by customers and end users.
Our products have had a limited period of time in the field under operation,
and these environmental factors may result in unanticipated returns of our
products. Any necessary modifications could cause us to incur significant
re-engineering costs, divert the attention of our engineering personnel from
our product development efforts and cause significant customer relations and
business reputation problems.

We have a large installed base of direct access arrangement products in
the field. As part of our ongoing support of this product line, we verify the
performance of our products through regulatory agency qualifications,
customer acceptance procedures, evaluation of end customer technical support
information, and analysis of field returns. Certain customer modem
implementations of our direct access arrangement products have been
identified to be susceptible to a particular class of electrical surges
originating from lightning strikes that are not adequately described in
regulatory agency qualifications. We have provided application guidelines to
our customers to enhance their implementation of the modem function to
protect our devices from these lightning strike electrical surges.

Damage from these electrical surges could result in product liability
claims against our customers that produce these modems or against us. Our
customers may seek indemnification or other compensation from us with respect
to any liability that they incur. Even if our DAA product is not the source
of the problem and we are not contractually liable for such indemnification,
we may incur costs in an effort to maintain good relations with our
customers. If we are held liable for these claims or incur other costs in
order to maintain good relations, this problem could adversely affect our
operating results.

A SUBSTANTIAL PORTION OF THE FINAL TESTING OF OUR PRODUCTS IS PERFORMED
INTERNALLY BY US, WHICH INCREASES OUR FIXED COSTS

During the three months ended March 31, 2001, substantially all of our
test operations were performed in-house. A minor portion of test operations
was provided by our contract manufacturers or other third parties. While we
expect that performing this testing in-house should provide us with
advantages in terms of lower per unit cost, quality control and shorter time
required to bring a product to market, we may encounter difficulties and
delays in maintaining or expanding our internal test capabilities. In
addition, final testing of complex semiconductors requires substantial
resources to acquire state-of-the-art testing equipment and hiring additional
qualified personnel, which has increased our fixed costs. If demand for our
products does not support the effective utilization of these employees and
additional equipment, we may not realize any benefit from foregoing the use
of outside vendors and utilizing internal final testing. Any decrease in the
demand for our products could result in the underutilization of our testing
equipment and personnel. If our internal test operations are underused or
mismanaged, we may incur significant costs that could adversely affect our
operating results.


20
WE PLAN TO INCREASE OUR INTERNATIONAL SALES ACTIVITIES SIGNIFICANTLY, WHICH
WILL SUBJECT US TO ADDITIONAL BUSINESS RISKS INCLUDING INCREASED LOGISTICAL
COMPLEXITY, POLITICAL INSTABILITY AND CURRENCY FLUCTUATIONS

We intend to open additional sales offices in international markets to
expand our international sales activities in Europe and the Pacific Rim
region. Our planned international sales growth will be limited if we are
unable to hire additional personnel and develop relationships with
international distributors. We may not be able to maintain or increase
international market demand for our products. Our international operations
are subject to a number of risks, including:

o increased complexity and costs of managing international
operations;

o protectionist laws and business practices that favor local
competition in some countries;

o multiple, conflicting and changing laws, regulations and tax
schemes;

o longer sales cycles;

o greater difficulty in accounts receivable collection and
longer collection periods; and

o political and economic instability.

To date, all of our sales to international customers and purchases of
components from international suppliers have been denominated in U.S.
dollars. As a result, an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to
foreign currencies could make our products more expensive for our
international customers to purchase, thus rendering them less competitive.

OUR INABILITY TO MANAGE GROWTH COULD MATERIALLY AND ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR
BUSINESS

During the past 27 months, we have significantly increased the scope of
our operations and expanded our workforce from 42 employees at January 2,
1999 to 252 employees at March 31, 2001. This growth has placed, and any
future growth of our operations will continue to place, a significant strain
on our management personnel, systems and resources. We anticipate that we
will need to implement a variety of new and upgraded operational and
financial systems, procedures and controls, including the improvement of our
accounting and other internal management systems. We also expect that we will
need to continue to expand, train, manage and motivate our workforce. All of
these endeavors will require substantial management effort. If we are unable
to effectively manage our expanding operations, our business could be
materially and adversely affected.

WE MAY BE UNABLE TO PROTECT OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, WHICH WOULD NEGATIVELY
AFFECT OUR ABILITY TO COMPETE

Our products rely on our proprietary technology, and we expect that future
technological advances made by us will be critical to sustain market
acceptance of our products. Therefore, we believe that the protection of our
intellectual property rights is and will continue to be important to the
success of our business. We rely on a combination of patent, copyright,
trademark and trade secret laws and restrictions on disclosure to protect our
intellectual property rights. We also enter into confidentiality or license
agreements with our employees, consultants and business partners, and control
access to and distribution of our documentation and other proprietary
information. Despite these efforts, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy
or otherwise obtain and use our proprietary technology. Monitoring
unauthorized use of our technology is difficult, and we cannot be certain
that the steps we have taken will prevent unauthorized use of our technology,
particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect our
proprietary rights as fully as in the United States. We cannot be certain
that patents will be issued as a result of our pending applications nor can
we be certain that any issued patents would protect or benefit us or give us
adequate protection from competing products. For example, issued patents may
be circumvented or challenged and declared invalid or unenforceable. We also
cannot be certain that others will not develop effective competing
technologies on their own.


21
SIGNIFICANT LITIGATION OVER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN OUR INDUSTRY MAY CAUSE US
TO BECOME INVOLVED IN COSTLY AND LENGTHY LITIGATION WHICH COULD SERIOUSLY HARM
OUR BUSINESS

In recent years, there has been significant litigation in the United
States involving patents and other intellectual property rights. From time to
time, we receive letters from various industry participants alleging
infringement of patents or misappropriation of trade secrets. The exploratory
nature of these inquiries has become relatively common in the semiconductor
industry. We typically respond when appropriate and as advised by legal
counsel. We have been involved in litigation to protect our intellectual
property rights in the past and may become involved in such litigation again
in the future. We may also become involved in litigation to defend
allegations of infringement asserted by others. Legal proceedings could
subject us to significant liability for damages or invalidate our proprietary
rights. Legal proceedings initiated by us to protect our intellectual
property rights could also result in counterclaims or countersuits against
us. Any litigation, regardless of its outcome, would likely be time consuming
and expensive to resolve and would divert our management's time and
attention. Any intellectual property litigation also could force us to take
specific actions, including:

o cease selling products that use the challenged intellectual
property;

o obtain from the owner of the infringed intellectual property
right a license to sell or use the relevant technology, which
license may not be available on reasonable terms, or at all;
or

o redesign those products that use infringing intellectual
property.

FAILURE TO EXPAND OUR DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS AND MANAGE OUR DISTRIBUTION
RELATIONSHIPS COULD IMPEDE OUR FUTURE GROWTH

The future growth of our business will depend in part on our ability to
expand our existing relationships with distributors and sales
representatives, develop additional channels for the distribution and sale of
our products and manage these relationships. As part of our channel sales
strategy, we intend to expand our relationships with distributors and sales
representatives. As we develop our indirect sales capabilities, we will need
to manage the potential conflicts that may arise with our direct sales
efforts. The inability to successfully execute or manage a multi-channel
sales strategy could impede our future growth.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR INDUSTRY

WE ARE SUBJECT TO THE CYCLICAL NATURE OF THE SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY

The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical and is characterized by
constant and rapid technological change, rapid product obsolescence and price
erosion, evolving standards, short product life cycles and wide fluctuations
in product supply and demand. The industry has experienced significant
downturns, often connected with, or in anticipation of, maturing product
cycles of both semiconductor companies' and their customers' products and
declines in general economic conditions. These downturns have been
characterized by diminished product demand, production overcapacity, high
inventory levels and accelerated erosion of average selling prices. The
industry is currently experiencing a significant downturn driven by the wide
and rapid deterioration in PC demand, a reduction in the expected unit sales
of wireless phones from previous robust forecasts, and forecasts of excess
capacity in the fiber optic networks. This downturn has resulted in a
material adverse effect on our business and operating results. The severity
and duration of these industry-wide trends are currently unclear and the
material adverse effect on our business may continue in the future.

Due to the cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry, any upturn in
business could result in increased competition for access to third-party
foundry and assembly capacity. We are dependent on the availability of such
capacity to manufacture and assemble our ICs. Except for non-contractual
assurances of support for specifically identified customer accounts, none of
our third-party foundry or assembly contractors have provided assurances that
adequate capacity will be available to us.


22
COMPETITION WITHIN THE NUMEROUS MARKETS WE TARGET MAY REDUCE SALES OF OUR
PRODUCTS AND REDUCE MARKET SHARE

The markets for semiconductors in general, and for mixed-signal ICs in
particular, are intensely competitive. We expect that the market for our
products will continually evolve and will be subject to rapid technological
change. In addition, as we target and supply products to numerous markets and
applications, including wireline, wireless and optical networking
communications markets, we face competition from a relatively large number of
competitors. Across all of our product areas, we compete with AMCC, Analog
Devices, Broadcom (through its acquisition of NewPort Communications, Inc.),
Conexant, CP Claire, Delta Integration, ESS, Fujitsu, Infineon Technologies,
Legerity (formerly the Advanced Micro Devices telecom division), Agere
Systems (formerly the Lucent Microelectronics business), Maxim Integrated
Products, National Semiconductor, Philips, Texas Instruments, Vitesse
Semiconductor Corp, and others. We expect to face competition in the future
from our current competitors, other manufacturers and designers of
semiconductors, and innovative start-up semiconductor design companies. Some
of our customers, such as Intel, Lucent, Motorola, and Texas Instruments, are
also large, established semiconductor suppliers. Our sales to and support of
these customers may enable them to become a source of competition to us,
despite our efforts to protect our intellectual property rights. As the
markets for communications products grow, we also may face competition from
traditional communications device companies. These companies may enter the
mixed-signal semiconductor market by introducing their own ICs or by entering
into strategic relationships with or acquiring other existing providers of
semiconductor products.

THE AVERAGE SELLING PRICES OF OUR PRODUCTS COULD DECREASE RAPIDLY WHICH MAY
NEGATIVELY IMPACT OUR GROSS MARGINS AND REVENUES

We may experience substantial period-to-period fluctuations in future
operating results due to the erosion of our average selling prices. We have
reduced the average unit price of our products in anticipation of future
competitive pricing pressures, new product introductions by us or our
competitors and other factors. Our customers may use their current excess
inventory situation to negotiate lower prices in the future. If we are unable
to offset any such reductions in our average selling prices by increasing our
sales volumes, our gross profits and revenues will suffer. To maintain gross
margins, we will need to develop and introduce new products and product
enhancements on a timely basis and continually reduce our costs. Our failure
to do so would cause our revenues and gross margins to decline.

OUR CUSTOMERS REQUIRE OUR PRODUCTS TO UNDERGO A LENGTHY AND EXPENSIVE
QUALIFICATION PROCESS WHICH DOES NOT ASSURE PRODUCT SALES

Prior to purchasing our products, our customers require that our products
undergo an extensive qualification process, which involves testing of the
products in the customer's system as well as rigorous reliability testing.
This qualification process may continue for six months or longer. However,
qualification of a product by a customer does not assure any sales of the
product to that customer. Even after successful qualification and sales of a
product to a customer, a subsequent revision to the IC, changes in its
manufacturing process or the selection of a new supplier by us may require a
new qualification process, which may result in delays and in us holding
excess or obsolete inventory. After our products are qualified, it can take
an additional six months or more before the customer commences volume
production of components or devices that incorporate our products. Despite
these uncertainties, we devote substantial resources, including design,
engineering, sales, marketing and management efforts, toward qualifying our
products with customers in anticipation of sales. If we are unsuccessful or
delayed in qualifying any of our products with a customer, such failure or
delay would preclude or delay sales of such product to the customer, which
may impede our growth and cause our business to suffer.

OUR PRODUCTS MUST CONFORM TO INDUSTRY STANDARDS IN ORDER TO BE ACCEPTED BY END
USERS IN OUR MARKETS

Generally, our products comprise only a part of a communications device.
All components of such devices must uniformly comply with industry standards
in order to operate efficiently together. We depend on companies that provide
other components


23
of the devices to support prevailing industry standards. Many of these
companies are significantly larger and more influential in effecting industry
standards than we are. Some industry standards may not be widely adopted or
implemented uniformly, and competing standards may emerge that may be
preferred by our customers or end users. If larger companies do not support
the same industry standards that we do, or if competing standards emerge,
market acceptance of our products could be adversely affected which would
harm our business.

Products for communications applications are based on industry standards
that are continually evolving. Our ability to compete in the future will
depend on our ability to identify and ensure compliance with these evolving
industry standards. The emergence of new industry standards could render our
products incompatible with products developed by other suppliers. As a
result, we could be required to invest significant time and effort and to
incur significant expense to redesign our products to ensure compliance with
relevant standards. If our products are not in compliance with prevailing
industry standards for a significant period of time, we could miss
opportunities to achieve crucial design wins. We may not be successful in
developing or using new technologies or in developing new products or product
enhancements that achieve market acceptance. Our pursuit of necessary
technological advances may require substantial time and expense.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Information related to quantitative and qualitative disclosures regarding
market risk is set forth in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and the risk factors under Item 2 above.
Such information is incorporated by reference herein.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings.

ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Our registration statement (Registration No. 333-94853) under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, relating to our initial public offering
of our common stock became effective on March 23, 2000. A total of 3,680,000
shares of common stock were registered. We sold a total of 3,200,000 shares
of our common stock and selling stockholders sold a total of 480,000 to an
underwriting syndicate. The managing underwriters were Morgan Stanley & Co.
Incorporated, Lehman Brothers Inc., and Salomon Smith Barney Inc. The
offering commenced and was completed on March 24, 2000, at a price to the
public of $31.00 per share. The initial public offering resulted in net
proceeds to us of $90.6 million, after deducting underwriting commissions of
$6.9 million and offering expenses of $1.6 million. We used $15 million of
the proceeds as part of the consideration paid in the acquisition of Krypton
Isolation Inc. on August 9, 2000. Another $4.3 million was used to pay off
the equipment loans at Imperial Bank. We used another $1.0 million of the
proceeds as part of the consideration paid in the acquisition of SNR
Semiconductor Incorporated on October 2, 2000. As of March 31, 2001, the
remaining proceeds were invested in government securities and other
short-term, investment-grade, interest bearing instruments.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

Not applicable

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable


24
ITEM 6.  EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a) The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit
Number
-------
<S> <C>
3.1* Form of Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
of Silicon Laboratories Inc. filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No.
333-94853 (the "IPO Registration Statement")) .

3.2* Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the IPO Registration Statement).

4.1* Specimen certificate for shares of common stock (filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to the IPO Registration Statement).
</TABLE>

- ----------------

* Incorporated herein by reference to the indicated filing.

(b) During the quarter ended March 31, 2001, we filed the following Current
Reports on Form 8-K:

Not applicable


















25
SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


SILICON LABORATORIES INC.


By: /s/ John W. McGovern
-------------------------------------------
John W. McGovern
VICE PRESIDENT AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

April 24, 2001 /s/ Navdeep S. Sooch
- ----------------------------- ----------------------------------------------
Date Navdeep S. Sooch
CHAIRMAN AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
(PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

April 24, 2001 /s/ John W. McGovern
- ----------------------------- ----------------------------------------------
Date John W. McGovern
VICE PRESIDENT AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
(PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER)



26