United Fire Group - 10-Q quarterly report FY

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008

Commission File Number 2-39621

UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

118 Second Avenue, S.E., Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52407

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (319) 399-5700

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

As of July 28, 2008, 26,792,282 shares of common stock were outstanding.

INDEX

United Fire & Casualty Company and Subsidiaries

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

It is important to note that our actual results could differ materially from those projected in our forward-looking statements. Information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements is contained in Part I Item 2 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors.”

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Consolidated Balance Sheets

United Fire & Casualty Company and Subsidiaries

The Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)

United Fire & Casualty Company and Subsidiaries

The Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

United Fire & Casualty Company and Subsidiaries

The Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

United Fire & Casualty Company and Subsidiaries

The terms “United Fire,” “we,” “us,” or “our” refer to United Fire & Casualty Company or United Fire & Casualty Company and its consolidated subsidiaries and affiliate, as the context requires. In the opinion of the management of United Fire, the accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, the results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for the year. The Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. The review report of Ernst & Young LLP as of and for the three- and six-month periods ending June 30, 2008, accompanies the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of Part I.

We maintain our records in conformity with the accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the insurance departments of the states in which we are domiciled. To the extent that certain of these practices differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), we have made adjustments to present the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The financial statement categories that are most dependent on management estimates and assumptions include investments, deferred policy acquisition costs, and future policy benefits and losses, claims and loss settlement expenses.

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash, money market accounts and non-negotiable certificates of deposit with original maturities of three months or less. We made payments for income taxes of $13.8 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008, compared to $31.7 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007. We made no significant payments of interest for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, other than interest credited to policyholders’ accounts.

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income includes all changes in equity during a period except those resulting from investments by shareholders and dividends to shareholders. The primary components of our comprehensive income are net income and the change in net unrealized appreciation on available-for-sale securities, as adjusted for amounts that have been reclassified as realized investment gains and losses.

The table below displays our comprehensive income and the related tax effects for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.

Income Taxes

In the six-month period ended June 30, 2008, our effective federal income tax rate was 13.2 percent, compared to 30.5 percent for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007. Our effective tax rate differs from the federal statutory rate of 35.0 percent due principally to the effect of tax-exempt municipal bond interest income, non-taxable dividend income, and the reduction in the valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets.

We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. We are no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax examination by tax authorities for years before 2004 and state income tax examination for years before 2002. There are no ongoing examinations of income tax returns by federal or state tax authorities.

Contingent Liabilities

We have been named as a defendant in various lawsuits, including actions seeking certification from the court to proceed as a class action suit and actions filed by individual policyholders, relating to disputes arising from damages that occurred as a result of Hurricane Katrina in 2005. As of June 30, 2008, there were in excess of 400 such cases pending, approximately 20 of which were styled as class actions. These cases have been filed in both Louisiana state courts and federal district courts. These cases involve, among other claims, disputes as to the amount of reimbursable claims in particular cases, as well as the scope of insurance coverage under homeowners and commercial property policies due to flooding, civil authority actions, loss of use and business interruption. Certain of these cases also claim a breach of duty of good faith or violations of Louisiana insurance claims-handling laws or regulations and involve claims for punitive or exemplary damages, while other cases claim that under Louisiana’s so-called “Valued Policy Law”, the insurers must pay the total insured value of a home that is totally destroyed if any portion of such damage was caused by a covered peril, even if the principal cause of the loss was an excluded peril. Other cases challenge the scope or enforceability of the water damage exclusion in the policies.

Several actions pending against various insurers, including us, were consolidated for purposes of pretrial discovery and motion practice under the caption In re Katrina Canal Breaches Consolidated Litigation, Civil Action No. 05-4182 in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana.

In light of an April 8, 2008 Louisiana Supreme Court decision finding that flood damage was clearly excluded from coverage, state and federal courts have been reviewing the pending suits seeking class certification and other pending suits in order to expedite pre-trial discovery and to move the cases towards trial. However, little has actually occurred, as many courts were waiting on a request that the Louisiana Supreme Court reconsider its decision. That request was denied on July 8, 2008. We expect litigation activity to resume now that the Louisiana Supreme Court has ruled on the flood issue.

In June 2008, a commercial policyholder was awarded approximately $21.0 million in additional Hurricane Katrina damages by a Federal Court jury sitting in New Orleans. The claims associated with this litigation represent what we consider to be our single largest exposure as a result of that hurricane. In response to this verdict, we recorded an incurred loss, net of reinsurance, of $10.8 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2008. However, we have filed an appeal of this verdict as we believe that the award includes damages that were attributable to flooding (and thus excluded from coverage) and that there were other errors at trial prejudicial to us.

We intend to continue to defend the cases related to losses incurred as a consequence of Hurricane Katrina. We have established our loss and loss settlement expense reserves on the assumption that the application of the Valued Policy Law will not result in our having to pay damages for perils not otherwise covered. We believe that, in the aggregate, these reserves should be adequate. However, our evaluation of these claims and the adequacy of recorded reserves may change if we encounter adverse developments in the further defense of these claims.

We consider all of our other litigation pending at June 30, 2008, to be ordinary, routine, and incidental to our business.

Flood Charges and Other Related Expenses

In June 2008, our corporate headquarters was forced to close temporarily due to historic flooding in Cedar Rapids, Iowa that caused extensive damage to the first and lower levels of our buildings. We recorded $3.8 million of flood-related expenses in the three-month period ended June 30, 2008, which primarily relate to costs incurred to cleanup the affected areas and the write off of property and equipment destroyed by the flood, and we anticipate incurring additional expenses for reconstruction and other related costs. A portion of these costs will be subject to recovery under our insurance. No such recovery has been recorded against the expenses incurred.

Fair Value Measurement

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure and report many financial instruments and certain other assets and liabilities at fair value. The objective of SFAS No. 159 is to improve financial reporting by providing entities the opportunity to reduce the complexity in accounting for financial instruments and to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We have elected not to report any financial assets or liabilities at fair value under SFAS No. 159 in our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure requirements regarding fair value measurement. Where applicable, SFAS No. 157 simplifies and codifies previously issued guidance on fair value. Although SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value measurements, its application may, in certain instances, change current practice. We adopted SFAS No. 157 effective January 1, 2008.

SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires us to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Our financial instruments are categorized into a three level hierarchy, which is based upon the priority of the inputs to the valuation technique. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). If the inputs used to measure fair value fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the category level is based on the lowest priority level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

Financial assets recorded at fair value are categorized in the fair value hierarchy as follows:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, as applicable, that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2: Quoted prices in markets, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, that are not active or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability, as applicable Level 2 inputs include the following:

a) Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets;

b) Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in non-active markets;

c) Inputs other than quoted market prices that are observable for the asset or liability; and

d) Inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement of the asset or liability, as applicable. Such inputs may reflect management’s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability.

The following table presents the categorization for our assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2008:

The following table provides a summary of the changes in fair value of our Level 3 assets for the three-month period ended June 30, 2008:

The following table provides a summary of the changes in fair value of our Level 3 assets for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008:

Securities Lending

In April 2008, we began participating in a securities lending program from which net investment income is generated by the lending of certain investments to other institutions for short periods of time. Borrowers of these securities must deposit collateral with Northern Trust Company, a third-party custodian, equal to at least 102% of the market value of the securities loaned (in the form of cash or securities) plus accrued interest. The market values of the loaned securities are monitored on a daily basis by Northern Trust Company. Additional collateral is added by the borrower or refunded to the borrower by Northern Trust Company as the market values of the loaned securities fluctuate, maintaining collateral values of at least 102% at all times. All collateral is held by Northern Trust Company and we have the right to access the collateral only if the institution borrowing our securities is in default under the lending agreement. Therefore, we do not recognize the receipt of the collateral held by Northern Trust Company or the obligation to return the collateral in our Consolidated Financial Statements. We also maintain effective control of the loaned securities and have the right and ability to redeem the securities loaned on short notice. Therefore, we continue to classify these securities as invested assets in our Consolidated Financial Statements. At June 30, 2008, we had securities totaling $44.5 million on loan under the program.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations.” SFAS 141(R) will significantly change the accounting for business combinations in a number of areas, including the treatment of contingent consideration, contingencies, acquisition costs, in-process research and development and restructuring costs. SFAS 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and early adoption is prohibited. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 141(R) to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51.” SFAS 160 will revise the treatment of noncontrolling interests in consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of income. Noncontrolling interests will become a part of stockholder’s equity in the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated income statements will report income attributable to the company and to noncontrolling interests separately. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and early adoption is prohibited. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 160 to have any impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

At our annual stockholders’ meeting on May 21, 2008, United Fire stockholders approved the United Fire 2008 Stock Plan, which was an amendment and restatement of the United Fire Nonqualified Employee Stock Option Plan. The key changes to the plan increased the number of shares of our common stock available for issuance from 1,000,000 to 1,900,000 and provided for stock awards, stock appreciation rights, and incentive stock options, as defined in Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code.

The 2008 Stock Plan authorizes the issuance of stock awards, stock appreciation rights, incentive stock options, and nonqualified stock options for up to 1,900,000 shares of United Fire common stock to employees, with 1,020,525 awards available for future issuance at June 30, 2008. The plan is administered by the board of directors. The board has the authority to determine which employees will receive awards under the plan, when awards will be granted, and the terms and conditions of the awards. The board may also take any action it deems necessary and appropriate for the administration of the plan. Pursuant to the plan, the board may, in its sole discretion, grant awards to employees of United Fire or any of its affiliated companies who are in positions of substantial responsibility with United Fire. Stock awards are generally granted free of charge to the eligible employees of United Fire as designated by the board of directors.

The activity in our 2008 Stock Plan is displayed in the following table.

We also have a nonemployee director stock option and restricted stock plan that authorizes United Fire to grant restricted stock and nonqualified stock options to purchase 150,000 shares of United Fire’s common stock, with 70,003 options available for future issuance at June 30, 2008. The board has the authority to determine which nonemployee directors receive awards under the plan, when options and restricted stock shall be granted, the option price, the option expiration date, the date of grant, the vesting schedule of options or whether the options shall be immediately vested, the terms and conditions of options and restricted stock (other than those terms and conditions set forth in the plan) and the number of shares of common stock to be issued pursuant to an option agreement or restricted stock agreement. The board may also take any action it deems necessary and appropriate for the administration of the plan.

The activity in our nonemployee stock option plan is displayed in the following table.

For each of the three-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, we recognized stock-based compensation expense of $.4 million. For each of the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, we recognized stock-based compensation expense of $.8 million. As of June 30, 2008, we have approximately $5.9 million in stock-based compensation expense that has yet to be recognized through our results of operations over the next five years. This compensation expense is recognized as the underlying stock options vest.

Among the employee benefit plans we offer, the two most significant plans are a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan and an employee/retiree health and dental benefit plan.

All of our employees are eligible to participate in the noncontributory defined benefit pension plan after they have completed one year of service, attained 21 years of age, and met the hourly service requirements with United Fire. Under our pension plan, retirement benefits are a function of the number of years of service and the level of compensation. Our policy is to fund this plan on a current basis to the extent that the contribution is deductible under existing tax regulations.

All of our eligible employees and retirees are able to participate in our health and dental benefit plan. The plan is composed of two programs: (1) the self-funded retiree health and dental benefit plan and (2) the self-funded employee health and dental benefit plan. The plan provides health and dental benefits to our employees and retirees (and covered dependents) who have met the service and participation requirements stipulated by the plan. The plan’s contract administrators are responsible for making medical and dental care benefit payments. The plan requires participants to submit claims for reimbursement or payment to the claims administrator within 12 months after the end of the calendar year in which the charges were incurred.

Our pension and postretirement benefit costs are displayed in the following table.

We previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 that we expected to contribute $4.0 million to our pension plan in 2008. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2008, we have contributed $1.5 million to the pension plan. We do not anticipate that the total contribution in 2008 will vary significantly from the expected contribution.

We have two reportable business segments in our operations: property and casualty insurance and life insurance. All of our property and casualty offices target a similar customer base, market the same products, and use the same marketing strategies, and are therefore aggregated. All of our insurance is sold domestically; we have no revenues allocable to foreign operations.

Our management evaluates the two segments on the basis of both statutory accounting practices prescribed by our states of domicile and GAAP. We analyze results based on profitability (i.e., loss ratios), expenses, and return on equity. The basis we use to determine and analyze segments and to measure segment profit have not changed from that reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

The following analysis has been reconciled to amounts reported in our unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements to adjust for inter-segment eliminations.

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income or loss available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share give effect to all dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. The dilutive shares we consider in our diluted earnings per share calculation relate to our outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards.

We determine the dilutive effect of our outstanding awards using the “treasury stock” method. Under this method, we assume the exercise of all of the outstanding awards whose exercise price is less than the weighted-average fair market value of our common stock during the period. This method also assumes that the proceeds from the hypothetical award exercises are used to repurchase shares of our common stock at the weighted-average fair market value of the stock during the period. The net of the assumed awards exercised and assumed common shares repurchased represent the number of dilutive common shares, which we add to the denominator of the earnings per share calculation.

The components of basic and diluted earnings per share are displayed in the following tables:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Stockholders of

United Fire & Casualty Company

We have reviewed the consolidated balance sheet of United Fire & Casualty Company as of June 30, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, and the consolidated statements of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the interim consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of United Fire & Casualty Company as of December 31, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, not presented herein, and in our report dated February 27, 2008, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2007, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

Chicago, Illinois

August 1, 2008

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Management’s Discussion and Analysis provides a narrative of our financial performance and condition that should be read in conjunction with the accompanying financial statements. It includes the following sections:

This report may contain forward-looking statements about our operations, anticipated performance and other similar matters. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements are not historical facts and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expected and/or projected. Such forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about our company, the industry in which we operate, and beliefs and assumptions made by management. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “continues,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “should,” “could,” “may,” “will continue,” “might,” “hope” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed in such forward-looking statements. Information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements is contained in Part II Item 1A “Risk Factors” of this document. Among other factors that could cause our actual outcomes and results to differ are:

These are representative of the risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from what is expressed in forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report or as of the date they are made. Except as required under the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we do not have any intention or obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Critical accounting policies are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties and that potentially may result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. Our discussion and analysis of our results of operations and financial condition are based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which we have prepared in accordance with GAAP. As we prepare these financial statements, we must make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Our critical accounting policies most sensitive to estimates include the following: the valuation of investments; the valuation of reserves for losses, claims, and loss settlement expenses; the valuation of reserves for future policy benefits; and the calculation of the deferred policy acquisition cost asset. These critical accounting policies are more fully described in our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Our Business

We operate property and casualty and life insurance businesses, marketing our products through independent agents. Although we maintain a broad geographic presence that includes most of the United States, more than half of our property and casualty premiums are written in Iowa, Texas, Colorado, Missouri and Indiana. Approximately three-fourths of our life insurance premiums are written in Iowa, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Nebraska, North Dakota and Illinois.

We conduct our operations through two distinct segments: property and casualty insurance and life insurance. We manage these segments separately because they generally do not share the same customer base, and they each have different pricing and expense structures. We evaluate segment profit based upon operating and investment results. Segment profit or loss described in the following sections of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis is reported on a pre-tax basis.

Financial Overview

During the second quarter of 2008, we were affected by an adverse court decision, a deteriorating investment environment, a surge in catastrophe losses, and a record-breaking flood that caused extensive damage to our corporate headquarters in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. The combination of these events had a significant impact on our overall performance.

On June 6, 2008, we received notice of an adverse decision by a Federal Court jury in New Orleans, Louisiana, in a lawsuit related to Hurricane Katrina. The judge in this case let the jury verdict stand which per Louisiana law required us to place $29.0 million on deposit with the State of Louisiana. This amount is recorded on our Consolidated Financial Statements as a miscellaneous receivable within other assets. We have also recorded a net loss after reinsurance of $10.8 million ($7.0 million after-tax), which is included in our second quarter loss results, but is not included in the catastrophe losses that we are reporting for the second quarter of 2008. We are appealing the jury’s decision.

During the second quarter, the investment environment deteriorated sharply, which we attribute to the credit and mortgage crisis. Although we have no direct exposure to these markets, we, like the rest of the insurance industry, are feeling an indirect impact on the fair value of our investments. The area most impacted was our holdings of investments in financial institutions. Our portfolio is made up predominantly of fixed-income investments, which is in line with our conservative approach to the management of investments.

Our company had losses from 19 catastrophes occurring in the second quarter totaling approximately $12.0 million, which is nearly four times the amount we had for the same period in 2007. Of this amount, the largest loss was approximately $3.0 million from the tornado that struck Parkersburg, Iowa, on May 25, 2008. Despite this surge in catastrophe-related losses, we remain confident in our risk selection and concentrations of risk.

In June 2008, our corporate headquarters was forced to close temporarily due to historic flooding in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, that caused extensive damage to the first and lower levels of our buildings. Our disaster recovery plan was effective in allowing us to access and restore all of our major automated processing systems within 24 hours of the flood, as well as have a temporary office for more than 200 employees up and running within one week. The efforts of our employees in our home office and our branch offices in implementing the disaster recovery plan was truly heroic, with many working around the clock to get us back in operation.

Our employees in the Cedar Rapids area continue to work from a temporary office. There have been a few minor technical issues to resolve, but we have worked around them and are not only maintaining our current book of business, but actively processing new business.

Our company recorded $3.8 million of flood-related expenses in the second quarter, which primarily relate to costs incurred to cleanup the affected areas and the write off of property and equipment destroyed by the flood, and we anticipate incurring additional expenses for reconstruction and other related costs. A portion of these costs will be subject to recovery under our insurance. No such recovery has been recorded against the expenses incurred. We feel the impact of the flood on our company is more emotional than financial, with several employees personally affected by the flood and many company keepsakes forever lost. Through this experience we have learned a great deal, making us a stronger company.

Despite everything we’ve endured this quarter, we are hopeful that we will experience a return to normal during the second half of the year. The reconstruction at our corporate headquarters remains on schedule, and we plan to have our employees begin reoccupying the buildings later this summer.

In the second quarter, our life insurance segment produced a net income of $2.6 million. This segment provides us with a stable flow of net income, which is especially important with the continuing soft market conditions in the property and casualty industry. The double digit increase in new premium of traditional life products in the first six months of 2008 is encouraging.

Consolidated Financial Highlights

Our results for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 deteriorated when compared to the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2007, due to the reasons described under the Financial Overview section of this Form 10-Q. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, with relatively flat premiums earned, losses and loss settlement expenses were 50.1 percent greater than the six months ended June 30, 2007, due to increased catastrophe losses, an increase in severity in our other liability lines and the previously described adverse court decision. The difference in realized investment gains between the six months ended June 30, 2008 and the six months ended June 30, 2007 was due to the call of fixed maturity securities in our life insurance segment, as well as a change in the market value of our trading securities portfolio.

In the six-month period ended June 30, 2008, our effective federal income tax rate was 13.2 percent, compared to 30.5 percent for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007. The decrease in the effective tax rate was due principally to the effect of tax-exempt municipal bond interest income, non-taxable dividend income, and the reduction in the valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets in comparison to the level of pretax income reported for each period.

Property and Casualty Insurance Segment Results

(1) Please refer to the Statutory and other financial measures section of this report for further explanation of this measure.

(2) This number does not include $10.8 million that was incurred in the second quarter of 2008 from a lawsuit related to Hurricane Katrina.

(3) The expense ratio does not include the $3.8 million in flood charges which were incurred in the second quarter of 2008.

In the first six months of 2008, our property and casualty insurance segment’s pre-tax income was $14.9 million, compared to pre-tax income of $85.7 million in the first six months of 2007. The deterioration in our pre-tax income is attributable to increased catastrophe losses, an increase in severity in our other liability lines and an adverse court decision that occurred during the first six months of 2008 as compared to the first six months of 2007. Additionally, investment income decreased $4.3 million in the first six months of 2008 as compared to the first six months of 2007 as a result of lower market interest rates. Realized investment gains were $1.1 million lower during the six-months ended June 30, 2008 than in the six-months ended June 30, 2007, which is primarily due to a decrease in the market value of our trading securities resulting from a change in current market conditions.

(1) “Other liability” is business insurance covering bodily injury and property damage arising from general business operations, accidents on the insured’s premises and products manufactured or sold.

(2) “Fire and allied lines” includes fire, allied lines, commercial multiple peril and inland marine.

(3) “Fire and allied lines” includes fire, allied lines, homeowners and inland marine.

The commercial lines pricing environment continues to be competitive, with an average of low-single digit percentage decreases in premium pricing during the second quarter. Each of our underwriting branches continued to experience pressure on renewals, especially midsize and large accounts. We also began to experience more competition in the workers’ compensation line in the Midwestern states. For the first time in this soft market cycle we are seeing competition in our coastal business, which includes the states of Florida, Alabama and Texas. The personal lines pricing environment also continues to be very competitive both in the auto and homeowners lines of business. The premium level, however, remained unchanged from the first quarter of 2008.

Although the commercial premium pricing decrease during the second quarter was modest, it is a continuation of a trend of gradual decreases in premium level for some lines of business dating back to the third quarter of 2004. Policy retention remained strong in both personal and commercial lines of business, with a slight percentage increase in commercial lines and a slight percentage decrease in personal lines from the first quarter of 2008.

Life Insurance Segment Results