UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
Apartment Investment and Management Company(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
(303) 757-8101(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year,if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
The number of shares of Class A Common Stock outstanding as of July 31, 2000: 67,590,368
TABLE OF CONTENTS
APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY
FORM 10-Q
2
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
4
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
5
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 — Organization
Apartment Investment and Management Company, a Maryland corporation incorporated on January 10, 1994 (“AIMCO” and, together with its consolidated subsidiaries and other controlled entities, the “Company”), owns a majority of the ownership interests in AIMCO Properties, L.P., (the “AIMCO operating partnership”) through its wholly owned subsidiaries, AIMCO-GP, Inc. and AIMCO-LP, Inc. The Company held an approximate 92% interest in the AIMCO operating partnership as of June 30, 2000. AIMCO-GP, Inc. is the sole general partner of the AIMCO operating partnership.
As of June 30, 2000, AIMCO:
At June 30, 2000, AIMCO had 67,578,000 shares of Class A Common Stock outstanding and the AIMCO operating partnership had 6,274,887 Partnership Common Units (“Common OP Units”) outstanding (excluding units held by the Company), for a combined total of 73,852,887 shares of Class A Common Stock and Common OP Units outstanding.
NOTE 2 — Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2000 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2000.
The balance sheet at December 31, 1999 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.
For further information, refer to the statements and notes thereto included in the AIMCO annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999. Certain 1999 financial statement amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2000 presentation.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of AIMCO, the AIMCO operating partnership, majority owned subsidiaries and controlled real estate limited partnerships. Interests held by limited partners in real estate partnerships controlled by the Company are reflected as minority interest in other entities. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Minority interest in limited partnerships represents the non-controlling partners’ share of the underlying net assets of the Company’s controlled limited partnerships. With regard to such partnerships, losses in excess of the basis in the minority interests of $15 million for the three months ended and $18 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000,
6
respectively, have been charged to operations. The assets of property owning limited partnerships and limited liability companies owned or controlled by AIMCO or the AIMCO operating partnership generally are not available to pay creditors of AIMCO or the AIMCO operating partnership.
NOTE 3 — Acquisitions
During the six months ended June 30, 2000 the Company purchased:
NOTE 4 — Interest Income Recognition for Notes Receivable and Investments
As of June 30, 2000 the Company holds $49 million of par value notes, plus accrued interest, net of intercompany par value notes of $85 million (“general partner par value notes”), for which management believes the collectibility of such amounts is both probable and estimable. Interest income for all general partner par value notes receivable, notes receivable from officers and others as well as money market and interest bearing accounts generally is recognized as it is earned. Interest income from such notes and investments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2000, totaled approximately $8 million and $15 million, respectively.
As of June 30, 2000, the Company held discounted notes, with a carrying value including accrued interest, of $92 million which were made by predecessors whose positions have been acquired by the Company at a discount and are carried at the acquisition amount with interest income being earned using the cost recovery method (“discounted notes”). The total face value plus accrued interest of these notes was $138 million. In general, interest income from the discounted notes is not recognized as it is accrued under the note instrument because the timing and amounts of cash flows are not probable and estimable. Under the cost recovery method, the discounted notes are carried at the acquisition amount, less subsequent cash collections, until such time as collectibility is probable and the timing and amounts are estimable. Based upon closed or pending transactions (including sales activity), market conditions, and improved operations of the obligor, among other things, certain notes and the related discounts have been determined to be collectible. Accordingly, interest income that had previously been deferred and portions of the related discounts were recognized as interest income during the period. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2000, the Company recognized, net of minority interests, deferred interest income and discounts of approximately $6 million ($0.09 per basic and $0.09 per diluted share) and $12 million ($0.18 per basic and $0.18 per diluted share), respectively.
NOTE 5 — Commitments and Contingencies
Legal
The Company is a party to various legal actions resulting from its operating activities. These actions are routine litigation and administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, some of which are covered by liability insurance, and none of which are expected to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition or results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries taken as a whole.
7
Limited Partnerships
In connection with the Company’s acquisitions of interests in limited partnerships that own properties, the Company and its affiliates are sometimes subject to potential legal actions, including allegations that such activities may involve breaches of fiduciary duties to the limited partners of such partnerships or violations of the relevant partnership agreements. The Company believes it complies with its fiduciary obligations and relevant partnership agreements, and does not expect any such legal actions to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition or results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries taken as a whole.
Pending Investigations of HUD Management Arrangements
In July 1999, the National Housing Partnership (“NHP”) received a grand jury subpoena requesting documents relating to NHP’s management of HUD-assisted or HUD-insured multi-family projects and NHP’s operation of a group purchasing program created by NHP, known as Buyers Access. The subpoena relates to the same subject matter as subpoenas NHP received in October and December of 1997 from the HUD Inspector General. To date, neither the HUD Inspector General nor the grand jury has initiated any action against NHP or AIMCO or, to NHP’s or AIMCO’s knowledge, any owner of HUD property managed by NHP. AIMCO believes that NHP’s operations and programs are in compliance, in all material respects, with all laws, rules and regulations relating to HUD-assisted or HUD-insured properties. AIMCO is cooperating with the investigation and does not believe that the investigation will result in a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company. However, as with any similar investigation, there can be no assurance that these will not result in material fines, penalties or other costs that may impact the Company’s future results of operations or cash flows.
Environmental
Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or operators to liability for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous substances present on a property. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release of the hazardous substances. The presence of, or the failure to properly remediate, hazardous substances may adversely affect occupancy at contaminated apartment communities and our ability to sell or borrow against contaminated properties. In addition to the costs associated with investigation and remediation actions brought by governmental agencies, the presence of hazardous wastes on a property could result in personal injury or similar claims by private plaintiffs. Various laws also impose liability for the cost of removal or remediation of hazardous substances at the disposal or treatment facility. Anyone who arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances is potentially liable under such laws. These laws often impose liability whether or not the person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal facility. In connection with the ownership, operation and management of our properties, the Company could potentially be liable for environmental liabilities or costs associated with properties or properties it acquires or manages in the future.
8
NOTE 6 — Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred Stock
The Company’s outstanding classes of preferred stock, and their original issue prices, as of June 30, 2000 and December 31, 1999, are as follows:
In January 2000, AIMCO issued 1,200,000 shares of newly created Class M Convertible Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share (“Class M Preferred Stock”), in a direct placement. The proceeds of $30.0 million were used to repay certain indebtedness and for working capital. For the period beginning January 13, 2000 through and including January 13, 2003, the holder of the Class M Preferred Stock is entitled to receive, when and as declared by the Board of Directors, annual cash dividends in an amount per share equal to the greater of (i) $2.125 per year (equivalent to 8.5% of the liquidation preference), or (ii) the cash dividends payable on the number of shares of Class A Common Stock into which a share of Class M Preferred Stock is convertible. Beginning with the third anniversary of the date of original issuance, the holder of Class M Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive an amount per share equal to the greater of (i) $2.3125 per year (equivalent to 9.25% of the liquidation preference), or (ii) the cash dividends payable on the number of shares of Class A Common Stock into which a share of Class M Preferred Stock is convertible. The 1,200,000 shares Class M Preferred Stock are convertible into 681,818 shares of Class A Common Stock. The Class M Preferred Stock is senior to the Class A Common Stock as to dividends and liquidation. Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, before payments or distributions by the Company are made to any holders of Class A Common Stock, the holder of the Class M Preferred Stock is entitled to receive a liquidation preference of $25 per share, plus accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends.
9
NOTE 7 — Earnings Per Share
Earnings per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock, common stock equivalents and dilutive convertible securities outstanding during the period. The following tables illustrate the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2000 and 1999 (in thousands, except per share data):
10
NOTE 8 — Industry Segments
The Company owns and operates multi-family apartment communities throughout the United States and Puerto Rico, which generate rental and other property-related income through the leasing of apartment units. The Company separately evaluates the performance of each of its apartment communities. However, because the apartment communities have similar economic characteristics, facilities, services and tenants, the apartment communities have been aggregated into a single apartment communities segment. All segment disclosures are included in or can be derived from the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
All revenues are from external customers and no revenues are generated from transactions with other segments. There are no tenants who contributed 10% or more of the Company’s total revenues during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2000 or June 30, 1999.
Although the Company operates in only one segment, there are different components of the multi-family business for which management considers disclosure to be useful. The following tables present the contribution (separated between consolidated and unconsolidated activity) to the Company’s Free Cash Flow for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2000, from these components, and a reconciliation of Free Cash Flow to: Earnings Before Structural Depreciation; Net Income; Funds From Operations; and Adjusted Funds From Operations (in thousands, except equivalent units (ownership effected and period weighted) and monthly rents):
11
FREE CASH FLOW FROM BUSINESS SEGMENTS
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2000(in thousands)
12
FREE CASH FLOW FROM BUSINESS SEGMENTS (Continued)
13
FREE CASH FLOW FROM BUSINESS SEGMENTSFor the Six Months Ended June 30, 2000(in thousands)
14
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2000(in thousands)
15
NOTE 9 — High Performance Units
In January 1998, AIMCO’s operating partnership sold an aggregate of 15,000 of its Class I High Performance Partnership Units (the “High Performance Units”) to a joint venture comprised of twelve members of AIMCO’s senior management and to three of its independent directors for a total of $2.1 million in cash. The High Performance Units have nominal value unless the Company’s total return (as defined below) over the three-year period ending December 31, 2000, is at least 30% and exceeds the industry average, as determined by a peer group index, by at least 15%. At the conclusion of the three year period, if the Company’s total return satisfies these criteria, the holders of the High Performance Units will receive distributions and allocations of income and loss from the AIMCO operating partnership in the same amounts and at the same times as would holders of a number of Common OP Units equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (i) the product of (a) 15% of the amount by which the Company’s cumulative total return over the three year period exceeds the greater of 115% of a peer group index or 30% (such excess being the “Excess Return”), multiplied by (b) the weighted average market value of the Company’s outstanding Class A Common Stock and Common OP Units, by (ii) the market value of one share of Class A Common Stock at the end of the three year period. The three-year measurement period will be shortened in the event of a change of control of the Company. Unlike Common OP Units, the High Performance Units are not redeemable or convertible into Class A Common Stock unless a change of control of the Company occurs. Because there is substantial uncertainty that the High Performance Units will have more than nominal value due to the required total return over the three-year term, the Company has not recorded any value to the High Performance Units in the consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2000. The Company includes any dilutive effect of the High Performance Units in its earnings.
The Morgan Stanley Dean Witter REIT Index is being used as the peer group index for purposes of the High Performance Units. The Morgan Stanley Dean Witter REIT Index is a capitalization-weighted index (with dividends reinvested) of the most actively traded real estate investment trusts. The Morgan Stanley Dean Witter REIT Index is comprised of over 100 real estate investment trusts selected by Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. Incorporated. The Board of Directors of the Company has selected this index because it believes that it is the real estate investment trust index most widely reported and accepted among institutional investors.
“Total return” means, for any security and for any period, the cumulative total return for such security over such period, as measured by (i) the sum of (a) the cumulative amount of dividends paid in respect of such security for such period (assuming that all cash dividends are reinvested in such security as of the payment date for such dividend based on the security price on the dividend payment date), and (b) an amount equal to (x) the security price
16
at the end of such period, minus (y) the security price at the beginning of such period, divided by (ii) the security price at the beginning of the measurement period; provided, however, that if the foregoing calculation results in a negative number, the total return shall be equal to zero. For purposes of calculating the total return of the AIMCO Class A Common Stock, the security price at the end of the period will be based on an average of the volume-weighted average daily trading price of the AIMCO Class A Common Stock for the 20 trading days immediately preceding the end of the period.
The High Performance Units are not convertible into AIMCO Class A Common Stock. However, in the event of a change of control of the Company, holders of High Performance Units will have redemption rights similar to those of holders of Common OP Units. Upon the occurrence of a change of control, any holder of High Performance Units may, subject to certain restrictions, require the AIMCO operating partnership to redeem all or a portion of the High Performance Units held by such party in exchange for a cash payment per unit equal to the liquidation value of a unit at the time of redemption. However, in the event that any High Performance Units are tendered for redemption, the Partnership’s obligation to pay the redemption price is subject to the prior right of the Company to acquire such High Performance Units in exchange for an equal number of shares of AIMCO Class A Common Stock with a market value equivalent to the liquidation value of the units.
If AIMCO’s total return over the measurement period exceeds 115% of the total return of the Morgan Stanley Dean Witter REIT Index and exceeds the minimum return (30% over three years), then the holders of High Performance Units could be entitled to a significant percentage of future distributions made by the AIMCO operating partnership. This could have a dilutive effect on future earnings per share of AIMCO Class A Common Stock, and on AIMCO’s equity ownership in the AIMCO operating partnership after the three-year measurement period.
The following table illustrates the value of the 15,000 High Performance Units at the end of the three-year measurement period, assuming a range of different prices for the AIMCO Class A Common Stock at the end of the measurement period. For the period from January 1, 1998 to June 30, 2000, the cumulative total return of the Morgan Stanley Dean Witter REIT Index was (10.13%) and the cumulative total return of the AIMCO Class A Common Stock was 39.2%. As a result, for purposes of the illustration, we have assumed that the cumulative total return of the AIMCO Class A Common Stock will exceed 115% of the cumulative total return of the peer group index. This implies that the High Performance Units will only have value if the cumulative total return on the AIMCO Class A Common Stock from January 1, 1998 to January 1, 2001 exceeds 30%. We have also assumed, for purposes of the illustration, that the weighted average market value of outstanding equity (AIMCO Class A Common Stock and Common OP Units) during the measurement period is $2,440,408,891, which was the amount as of June 30, 2000.
17
Please note that the table below is for illustrative purposes only and there can be no assurance that actual outcomes will be within the ranges used. Some of the factors that could affect the results set forth in the table are the total return of the AIMCO Class A Common Stock relative to the total return of the Morgan Stanley Dean Witter REIT Index, and the market value of the average outstanding equity of the Company during the measurement period. These factors may be affected by general economic conditions, local real estate conditions and the dividend policy of the Company.
[Additional columns below]
[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
18
The following table summarizes the status of the High Performance Units as of December 31, 1999 and June 30, 2000:
NOTE 10 — Portfolios Held for Sale
The Company is currently marketing for sale certain real estate properties as part of its policy of selling the lowest ranking properties (as determined by management from time to time) in the Company’s portfolio. Approximately 10,284 units with an approximate carrying value of $143 million are included with real estate in the consolidated financial statements and approximately 20,192 units with an approximate carrying value of $101 million are included with investments in unconsolidated real estate partnerships in the consolidated financial statements. The Company does not expect to incur any material losses with respect to the sales of the properties.
NOTE 11 — Pending Acquisition
On June 28, 2000 the Company announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement pursuant to which the Company will acquire the stock and other interests held by the principals, officers and directors of Oxford Realty Financial Group (“ORFG”) in entities, including ORFG, which own interests in and control the Oxford properties, for a purchase price of $301 million. The Oxford properties are 166 apartment communities including 36,662 units, located in 18 states. The Company currently manages the Oxford properties pursuant to long-term contracts. In addition to the interests in the Oxford properties, the Company is acquiring the entity which owns the managing general partner position in Oxford Tax-Exempt Fund II, L.P. (“OTEF”). OTEF holds tax-exempt bonds primarily secured by mortgages on certain of the Oxford properties. The Company has also agreed to purchase approximately 700,000 OTEF securities that represent approximately a 9% limited partnership interest.
19
ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Overview
AIMCO is a real estate investment trust with headquarters in Denver, Colorado and 29 regional operating centers, which holds a geographically diversified portfolio of apartment communities. As of June 30, 2000, the Company owned or managed 343,878 apartment units, comprised of 135,261 units in 483 apartment communities owned or controlled by the Company (the “Owned Properties”), 100,441 units in 614 apartment communities in which the Company has an equity interest (the “Equity Properties”) and 108,176 units in 705 apartment communities which the Company manages for third parties and affiliates (the “Managed Properties” and together with the Owned Properties and the Equity Properties, the “AIMCO Properties”). The apartment communities are located in 48 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico.
In the three months ended June 30, 2000, AIMCO completed $207 million in acquisitions, dispositions, and mortgage-financing transactions. AIMCO purchased $43 million of limited partnership interests. AIMCO sold six apartment communities and six commercial properties for a total sales price of $75 million. AIMCO’s share of the sales price was $19 million and gain was $0.2 million. Second quarter refinancing activity included the closing of $89 million of new mortgages and loan assumptions at a weighted average interest rate of 7.67%. As previously announced, AIMCO also entered into a definitive agreement to acquire certain stock and interests in entities that own and control the Oxford portfolio of properties.
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements in certain circumstances. Certain information included in this Report contains or may contain information that is forward-looking, including, without limitation, statements regarding the effect of acquisitions, the Company’s future financial performance and the effect of government regulations. Actual results may differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a variety of risks and factors including, without limitation, national and local economic conditions: the general level of interest rates; the terms of governmental regulations that affect the Company and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment in which the Company operates; financing risks, including the risk that the Company’s cash flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest; real estate risks, including variations of real estate values and the general economic climate in local markets and competition for tenants in such markets; acquisition and development risks, including failure of such acquisitions to perform in accordance with projections; and possible environmental liabilities, including costs which may be incurred due to necessary remediation of contamination of properties presently owned or previously owned by the Company. In addition, the Company’s current and continuing qualification as a real estate investment trust involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and depends on its ability to meet the various requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Code, through actual operating results, distributions levels and diversity of stock ownership. Readers should carefully review the Company’s financial statements and the notes thereto, as well as the risk factors described in documents the Company files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Results of Operations
Comparison of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2000 to the Three Months Ended June 30, 1999
Net Income
The Company recognized net income of $11.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2000, compared with $23.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 1999. The decrease in net income of $11.3 million, or (48.9%), primarily was the result of $15 million charged to operations for partnership losses or distributions in excess of the basis in minority interests.
20
Consolidated Rental Property Operations
Rental and other property revenues from the consolidated Owned Properties totaled $258.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2000, compared with $116.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 1999, an increase of $141.9 million, or 122.1%. The increase in rental and other property revenues reflects an increase in “same store” sales revenue of 5.1%; the purchase of 28 properties during 1999 and one property in 2000; the acquisition of controlling interests in partnerships owning 227 properties; and the subsequent consolidation of the purchased and newly controlled entities; partly offset by the sale of 25 properties.
Property operating expenses for the consolidated Owned Properties, consisting of on-site payroll costs, utilities (net of reimbursements received from tenants), contract services, turnover costs, repairs and maintenance, advertising and marketing, property taxes and insurance, totaled $104.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2000, compared with $45.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 1999, an increase of $59.6 million or 132.2%. The increase in property operating expenses primarily was due to an increase in “same store” expenses of 3.7%; the purchase of 28 properties in 1999 and 1 property in 2000; the acquisition of controlling interests in partnerships owning 227 properties; and the subsequent consolidation of the purchased and newly controlled entities; partly offset by the sale of 25 properties.
Service Company Business
The Company’s share of income from the service company business remained relatively unchanged with $4.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2000, compared with $4.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 1999. Expenses of the service company business increased $5.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2000 compared with the three months ended June 30, 1999 primarily due to the investment in several technology initiatives and product enhancements.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses decreased from $2.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 1999 to $1.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2000, a 17.4% decrease. The decrease primarily is due to the classification of certain general and administrative costs with management and other expenses of the service company business.
Interest Expense
Interest expense, which includes the amortization of deferred financing costs, totaled $64.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2000, compared with $29.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 1999, an increase of $34.7 million, or 116.8%. The increase primarily was due to the Company acquiring controlling interests in partnerships owning 227 properties and the subsequent consolidation of these properties. The Company had also drawn $293.5 million on its credit facility with Bank of America as of June 30, 2000 compared with $0 at June 30, 1999. The cost of such borrowing was at a weighted average interest rate of 9.06% at June 30, 2000.
Interest Income
Interest income totaled $15.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2000, compared with $11.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 1999. The increase of $4.5 million primarily is due to the recognition of interest accretion on discounted acquisition notes.
21
Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2000 to the Six Months Ended June 30, 1999
The Company recognized net income of $37.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000, compared with $37.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 1999. The increase in net income of $0.6 million, or 1.6%, primarily was the result of an increase in net “same store” property results; the acquisition of 28 properties during 1999 and one property during 2000; the completion of the merger of Insignia Properties Trust into AIMCO; the purchase of $271 million in limited partnership interests from unaffiliated third parties in 1999; and an increase in interest income on notes receivable from unconsolidated real estate partnerships in 2000. The effect of the above on net income was partially offset by $18 million charged to operations for partnership losses or distributions in excess of the basis in minority interests and the sale of eight properties during 1999 and twenty-five properties in 2000. These factors are discussed in more detail in the following paragraphs.
Rental and other property revenues from the consolidated Owned Properties totaled $482.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000, compared with $228.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 1999, an increase of $253.6 million, or 110.8%. The increase in rental and other property revenues primarily was due to an increase in “same store” sales revenue of 4.2%; the purchase of 28 properties in 1999 and one property in 2000; the acquisition of controlling interests in partnerships owning 227 properties; and the subsequent consolidation of the purchased and newly controlled entities; partly offset by the sale of 25 properties.
Property operating expenses for the consolidated Owned Properties, consisting of on-site payroll costs, utilities (net of reimbursements received from tenants), contract services, turnover costs, repairs and maintenance, advertising and marketing, property taxes and insurance, totaled $195.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000, compared with $88.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 1999, an increase of $107.1 million or 121.3%. The increase in property operating expenses primarily was due to an increase in “same store” expenses of 1.9%; the purchase of 28 properties in 1999 and one property in 2000; the acquisition of controlling interests in partnerships owning 227 properties; and the subsequent consolidation of the purchased and newly controlled entities; partly offset by the sale of 25 properties.
The Company’s share of income from the service company business was $9.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000, compared with $3.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 1999. The increase in service company business income of $6 million, or 171%, primarily was due to a reduction in the allocation of management contract expense between the consolidated service company business and the unconsolidated subsidiaries. The allocation of such expense will remain constant on a year to year comparison, and the core business operations remained unchanged between the periods. Expenses increased due to the investment in several technology initiatives and product enhancements.
General and administrative expenses remained relatively unchanged with $5.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 1999 and $5.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000.
Interest expense, which includes the amortization of deferred financing costs, totaled $122.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000, compared with $61.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 1999, an increase of $61.5 million, or 100.7%. The increase primarily was due to the Company acquiring controlling interests in partnerships owning 227 properties and the subsequent consolidation of these properties. The Company had also drawn $293.5 million on its credit facility with Bank of America as of June 30, 2000 compared with $0 at June 30, 1999. The cost of such borrowing was at a weighted average interest rate of 9.06% at June 30, 2000.
22
Interest income totaled $28.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000, compared with $20.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 1999. The increase of $7.8 million or 37% primarily is due to the recognition of interest accretion on discounted acquisition notes.
Funds From Operations
For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2000 and 1999, the Company’s Funds From Operations (“FFO”) on a fully diluted basis were as follows (dollars in thousands):
FFO increased to $105 million and $203 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2000, respectively, compared with $78 million and $144 million, respectively, for the same periods in 1999 primarily due to: increases in “same store” property operations; the acquisition and subsequent consolidation of newly controlled entities and controlling interests in partnerships owning 227 properties; and the purchase of 28 properties in 1999 and 1 property in 2000; partly offset by the sale of 25 properties.
23
Same Store Property Operating Results
The Company defines “same store” properties as apartment communities owned in the comparable periods of 2000 and 1999. The following table summarizes the unaudited consolidated rental property operations on a “same store” basis (dollars in thousands):
Liquidity and Capital Resources
For the six months ended June 30, 2000 and 1999, net cash flows were as follows (dollars in thousands):
During the six months ended June 30, 2000, the Company closed $207.7 million of long-term fixed-rate, fully amortizing notes payable with a weighted average interest rate of 8.02%. Each of the notes is individually secured by one of nineteen properties with no cross-collateralization. The Company used the net proceeds totaling $204.9 million after transaction costs to repay existing debt and for working capital. During the six months ended June 30, 2000, the Company also assumed a $7 million long-term fixed rate, fully amortizing note payable with an interest rate of 8.37% in connection with the acquisition of one property. The note is secured by the acquired property.
In August 1999, the Company closed a $300 million revolving credit facility arranged by Bank of America, N.A. BankBoston, N.A. and First Union National Bank with a syndicate comprised of a total of nine lender participants. Effective March 15, 2000 the credit facility was expanded by $45 million with the potential to expand it by another $55 million to a total of $400 million. On April 14, 2000, the credit facility was expanded by $5 million to $350 million. The obligations under the credit facility are secured by certain non-real estate assets of the Company. Borrowings under the credit facility, including the $50 million expansion, are available for general corporate purposes. The credit facility has a two-year term subject to two one-year extensions. The annual interest rate under the credit facility is based either on LIBOR or a base rate which is the higher of Bank of America’s reference rate or 0.5% over the federal funds rate, plus, in either case, an applicable margin. The margin ranges between 2.05% and 2.55%, in the case of LIBOR-based loans, and between 0.55% and 1.05%, in the case of base rate loans, based upon a fixed charge coverage ratio. The weighted average interest rate at June 30, 2000 was 9.06%. The amount available under different credit facilities at June 30, 2000 and 1999 was $56.5 million and $145 million, respectively.
The Company expects to meets its short-term liquidity requirements including property acquisitions, tender offers and refinancing of short-term debt with long-term, fixed rate, fully amortizing debt, secured or unsecured short-term debt, the issuance of debt or equity securities in public offerings or private placements, and cash generated from operations.
24
On June 28, 2000, the Company announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement pursuant to which the Company will acquire the stock and other interests held by the principals, officers and directors of Oxford Realty Financial Group (“ORFG”) in entities, including ORFG, which own interest in and control the Oxford properties, for a purchase price of $301 million. The Oxford properties are 166 apartment communities including 36,662 units, located in 18 states. The Company has agreed to pay $241 million in cash and $60 million in AIMCO Common OP Units and/or Class A Common Stock. The Company expects to borrow the cash portion of the purchase price from Bank of America, N.A. and Lehman Brothers pursuant to a term loan that the Company intends to repay from presently scheduled property refinancings, expected property sales, and internal cash flow. The term loan requires amortization of $15 million per quarter for the first year increasing to $30 million per quarter thereafter and matures on July 31, 2002. The term loan will bear interest at LIBOR plus 4% for the first twelve months and increases by 0.5% each six months thereafter. The term loan is expected to be secured by certain Oxford assets to be acquired.
At June 30, 2000, the Company had $90.7 million in cash and cash equivalents. In addition, the Company had $108.3 million of restricted cash, primarily consisting of reserves and impounds held by lenders for capital expenditures, property taxes and insurance. The Company’s principal demands for liquidity include normal operating activities, payments of principal and interest on outstanding debt, capital improvements, acquisitions of or investments in properties, dividends paid to its stockholders and distributions paid to limited partners. The Company considers its cash provided by operating activities, and funds available under its credit facilities, to be adequate to meet short-term liquidity demands. The Company utilizes its revolving credit facility for general corporate purposes and to fund investments on an interim basis.
From time to time, the Company has offered to acquire and, in the future, may offer to acquire the interests held by third party investors in certain limited partnerships for which the Company acts as general partner. Any such acquisitions will require funds to pay the cash purchase price for such interests. During the six months ended June 30, 2000, the Company made separate offers to the limited partners of 189 partnerships to acquire their limited partnership interests, and purchased approximately $61 million (including transaction costs) of limited partnership interests.
Return on Assets and Return on Equity
The Company’s Return On Assets and Return On Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2000 and 1999 are as follows:
25
The increase in Return On Assets (AFFO) and (FFO) from the 1999 period to the 2000 period is the result of higher returns on acquired properties, as well as on the additional properties consolidated in the fourth quarter of 1999 and the first half of 2000.
The increase in Return On Equity-Basic (AFFO) and (FFO) and Return On Equity –Diluted (AFFO) and (FFO) from the 1999 period to the 2000 period primarily is due to increased Return on Assets.
Litigation
Contingencies
26
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The Company’s primary market risk exposure relates to changes in interest rates. The Company is not subject to any foreign currency exchange rate risk or commodity price risk, or any other material market rate or price risks. The Company uses predominantly long-term, fixed-rate and self-amortizing non-recourse debt in order to avoid the refunding or repricing risks of short-term borrowings. The Company uses short-term debt financing and working capital primarily to fund acquisitions and generally expects to refinance such borrowings with proceeds from equity offerings or long term debt financings.
The Company had $444.9 million of variable rate debt outstanding at June 30, 2000, which represents 13.3% of the Company’s total outstanding debt. Based on this level of debt, an increase in interest rates of 1% would result in the Company’s income and cash flows being reduced by $4.4 million on an annual basis.
The estimated aggregate fair value of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, receivables, payables and short-term secured and unsecured debt as of June 30, 2000 is assumed to approximate their carrying value due to their relatively short terms. Management further believes that, after consideration of interest rate agreements, the fair market value of the Company’s secured tax-exempt bond debt and secured long-term debt approximates their carrying value, based on market comparisons to similar types of debt instruments having similar maturities.
27
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
None.
ITEM 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
From time to time during the quarter, AIMCO issued shares of Class A Common Stock in exchange for Common OP Units tendered to the AIMCO operating partnership for redemption in accordance with the terms and provisions of the agreement of limited partnership of the AIMCO operating partnership. Such shares are issued based on an exchange ratio of one share for each Common OP Unit. The shares are issued in exchange for Common OP Units in private transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), pursuant to Section 4(2) thereof. During the six months ended June 30, 2000, 137,314 shares of Class A Common Stock were issued in exchange for Common OP Units.
As disclosed in AIMCO’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated January 13, 2000, on January 13, 2000 AIMCO sold 1,200,000 shares of Class M Convertible Cumulative Preferred Stock to an institutional investor for $30 million. The shares were issued in a private placement transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4 (2) thereof.
ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The Company held its annual meeting of stockholders on April 20, 2000. At themeeting, the stockholders approved the proposals set forth below:
Votes Cast For Each Director
There were no abstentions or Broker nonvotes.
John D. Smith did not stand for re-election to the Board of Directors. See Item 5. Other Information.
28
ITEM 5. Other Information
On June 5, 2000 AIMCO announced the election of James N. Bailey to the AIMCO Board of Directors. Mr. Bailey is co-founder of Cambridge Associates, LLC. He received his BA degree magna cum laude from Harvard University in 1969, after which he enrolled in the first class of Harvard Business and Harvard Law Schools’ joint program. There in 1973 he received his MBA and JD degrees from Harvard Business School and Harvard Law School, respectively. Upon graduation, Mr. Bailey, along with co-founder Hunter Lewis formed Cambridge Associates to provide investment and financial planning to nonprofit, endowed institutions. Harvard became Cambridge Associates’ first client in July of 1973 when Harvard’s new Treasurer, George Putnam, Jr. hired Cambridge to conduct a comprehensive study of endowment practices that led to the creation of the Harvard Management Company, Inc. Cambridge Associates has developed into a premier investment consulting firm for nonprofit institutions and wealthy family groups.
Mr. Bailey is also co-founder, Treasurer and Director of The Plymouth Rock Company, Direct Response Corporation, and Homeowner’s Direct Corporation, all U.S. personal lines insurance companies. In addition, he serves as a Trustee and member of the Investment Committee of the New England Aquarium. He has also been a member of a number of Harvard University alumni affairs committees, including the Overseers Nominating Committee and The Harvard Endowment Committee. He is also a member of the Massachusetts Bar and the American Bar Associations.
29
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed with this report (1):
(b) Reports on Form 8-K for the quarter ended June 30, 2000:
During the quarter for which this report is filed, Apartment Investment and Management Company filed its Current Report on Form 8-K, dated June 28, 2000, relating to the acquisition by AIMCO and AIMCO Properties, L.P. of interests in 166 apartment communities from affiliates of Oxford Realty Financial Group.
30
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: August 14, 2000
31
EXHIBIT INDEX(1)