Assured Guaranty - 10-Q quarterly report FY

ASSURED GUARANTY LTD.

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q

2

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Assured Guaranty Ltd.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands of U.S. dollars except per share and share amounts)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3

Assured Guaranty Ltd.
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(in thousands of U.S. dollars except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4

Assured Guaranty Ltd.
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
For Six Months Ended June 30, 2005
(in thousands of U.S. dollars except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5

Assured Guaranty Ltd.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

6

The Company has participated in several lines of business that are reflected in its historical financial statements but that the Company exited in connection with the IPO, including equity layer credit protection, trade credit reinsurance, title reinsurance, life, accident and health and auto residual value reinsurance.  These lines of business make up the Company’s other segment.

2.  Basis of Presentation

The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, which include the accounts of the Company, have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements cover the three-month periods ended June 30, 2005 (“Second Quarter 2005”) and June 30, 2004 (“Second Quarter 2004”), and the six-month periods ended June 30, 2005 (“Six Months 2005”) and June 30, 2004 (“Six Months 2004”). Operating results for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for a full year.  Certain items in the prior year consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the current period presentation. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Amounts presented prior to April 28, 2004, the IPO date, were prepared on an historical combined basis, since Assured Guaranty Ltd. and its subsidiaries were included in the results of ACE. However, since the entities are the same for all periods presented, the financial statements have been prepared and reported on a consolidated basis.  This presentation has no impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition. Certain expenses reflected in the June 30, 2004 consolidated financial statements include allocations of corporate expenses incurred by ACE, related to general and administrative services provided to the Company, including tax consulting and preparation services, internal audit services and liquidity facility costs.

Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries are subject to U.S. income tax.  The provision for income taxes is calculated in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“FAS”) FAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”.  The Company’s provision for income taxes for interim financial periods is not based on an estimated annual effective rate due to the variability in changes in fair value of its derivative financial instruments.  A discrete calculation of the provision is calculated for each interim period.  The Company’s tax sharing agreement is further discussed in Note 9.

3.  Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“FAS 123R”). FAS 123R replaces FAS No.123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“FAS 123”) and supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”). As permitted by FAS 123, the Company currently accounts for share-based payments to employees using APB 25’s intrinsic value method and, as such, generally recognizes no compensation expense for employee stock options. Accordingly, the adoption of FAS 123R’s fair value method will impact the Company’s results of operations, although it will have no impact on its overall financial position. The impact of adoption of FAS 123R cannot be predicted at this time because it will depend on levels of share-based payments granted in the future. However, had the Company adopted FAS 123R in prior periods, the impact of that standard would have approximated the impact of FAS 123 as described in the disclosure of pro forma net income and earnings per share in Note 7. FAS 123R also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation expense to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under current literature. This requirement will reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing cash flows

8

In connection with the IPO, the Company entered into several reinsurance agreements with subsidiaries of ACE that are considered retroactive reinsurance contracts. Under applicable accounting rules related to retroactive reinsurance, the Company would not be able to recognize a reinsurance recoverable on future adverse loss development, if applicable, until the Company paid the underlying loss and the Company is reimbursed by ACE. This difference in timing will cause the Company’s results of operations to otherwise be lower during the period in which, if at all, the Company recognizes a loss for adverse development on one of these agreements, notwithstanding the reinsurance, and will be recaptured through income in the period in which the Company actually recovers the underlying loss. For Second Quarter 2004, at the inception of these retroactive reinsurance contracts, ceded premiums written increased $92.5 million, ceded premiums earned increased $66.9 million and ceded loss and loss adjustment expenses increased $56.9 million.

For Six Months 2004 direct premiums written and direct loss and loss adjustment expenses (“LAE”) were impacted $(97.8) million and $(19.0) million, respectively, from the close out of transaction types either through reinsurance or commutation the Company does not expect to underwrite in the future.

Reinsurance recoverable on ceded losses and LAE as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 were $112.4 million and $120.2 million, respectively, and were all related to our other segment. Of these amounts, $90.0 million and $97.8 million, respectively, related to reinsurance agreements with ACE.

For Second Quarter 2005, $9.7 million and $4.2 million of our gross written premiums was ceded by Ambac Assurance Corporation (“Ambac”) and MBIA Insurance Corporation (“MBIA”), respectively.  Also during Second Quarter 2005, Financial Security Assurance Inc. (“FSA”) ceded $10.4 million of gross written premiums, excluding $18.4 million of reassumption premiums related to our healthcare business described below in the section titled “Agreement with FSA.” For Second Quarter 2004, $17.1 million, $9.5 million and $6.7 million of our gross written premiums was ceded by FSA, Ambac and MBIA, respectively.

For Six Months 2005, $32.6 million, excluding the aforementioned $18.4 million of reassumption premiums related to our healthcare business, $20.4 million and $8.9 million of our gross written premiums was ceded by FSA, Ambac and MBIA, respectively.  For Six Months 2004, $45.1 million, $20.7 million and $16.6 million of our gross written premiums was ceded by FSA, Ambac and MBIA, respectively.

Agreement with FSA

During Second Quarter 2005, Assured Guaranty Corp. (“AGC”) and Assured Guaranty Re Ltd. (“AG Re”), two of our subsidiaries, entered into a reinsurance agreement with FSA pursuant to which substantially all of FSA’s financial guaranty risks previously ceded to AGC (the “Ceded Business”) were assumed by AG Re.  This agreement is effective as of January 1, 2005.   In connection with the transaction, AGC transferred liabilities of $169.0 million, consisting primarily of unearned premium reserves.  All profit and loss related items associated with this transfer were eliminated in consolidation, with the exception of profit commission expense, certain other operating expenses, and provision for income taxes.  Since this transaction transferred unearned premium reserve from AGC, a U.S. tax payer, to AG Re, a non-U.S. taxable entity, we released a deferred tax liability related to differences between the book and tax carrying amounts of unearned premium reserves which resulted in a tax benefit.  The total impact of all these items on net income was $3.7 million.  FSA has agreed it would release AGC from all liabilities with respect to the Ceded Business.  FSA and AG Re have agreed that AG Re shall assume substantially all of AGC’s liabilities with respect to the Ceded Business. FSA may receive a profit commission on the Ceded Business based on its future performance.

FSA has also reassumed from AG Re approximately $12.0 million of unearned premium reserves, net of ceding commissions, of healthcare related business with an approximate par value of $820.0 million.

10

5.  Commitments and Contingencies

Lawsuits arise in the ordinary course of the Company’s business. It is the opinion of the Company’s management, based upon the information available, that the expected outcome of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity, although an adverse resolution of a number of these items could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or liquidity in a particular quarter or fiscal year.

In April 2005, AGC received a Notice of Order to Preserve (“Order”) from the Office of the Commissioner of Insurance, State of Georgia (“Commissioner”).  The Order was directed to “ACE Limited, and all affiliates” and requires the preservation of documents and other items related to “finite insurance” and a broad group of other insurance and reinsurance agreements.  Also in April, AGC, and numerous other insurers, received a subpoena from the Commissioner related to the “initial phase” of the Commissioner’s investigation into “finite-risk” transactions.  The subpoena requests information on AGC’s assumed and ceded reinsurance contracts in force during 2004.  AGC is cooperating with the Commissioner.

In the ordinary course of their respective businesses, certain of the Company’s subsidiaries assert claims in legal proceedings against third parties to recover losses paid in prior periods.  The amounts, if any, the Company will recover in these proceedings are uncertain, although recoveries in any one or more of these proceedings during any quarter or fiscal year could be material to the Company’s results of operations in that particular quarter or fiscal year.  See Note 4 for information on reinsurance recoveries due to the Company’s legal proceedings against third parties.

The Company is party to reinsurance agreements with most of the major monoline primary financial guaranty insurance companies. The Company’s facultative and treaty agreements are generally subject to termination (i) upon written notice (ranging from 90 to 120 days) prior to the specified deadline for renewal, (ii) at the option of the primary insurer if the Company fails to maintain certain financial, regulatory and rating agency criteria which are equivalent to or more stringent than those the Company is otherwise required to maintain for its own compliance with state mandated insurance laws and to maintain a specified financial strength rating for the particular insurance subsidiary or (iii) upon certain changes of control of the Company. Upon termination under the conditions set forth in (ii) and (iii) above, the Company may be required (under some of its reinsurance agreements) to return to the primary insurer all statutory unearned premiums, less ceding commissions, attributable to reinsurance ceded pursuant to such agreements after which the Company would be released from liability with respect to the ceded business. Upon the occurrence of the conditions set forth in (ii) above, whether or not an agreement is terminated, the Company may be required to obtain a letter of credit or alternative form of security to collateralize its obligation to perform under such agreement or it may be obligated to increase the level of ceding commission paid.

6.  Long-Term Debt and Credit Facilities

The Company’s unaudited interim consolidated financial statements include long-term debt used to fund the Company’s insurance operations, and related interest expense, as described below.

Senior Notes

On May 18, 2004, Assured Guaranty US Holdings Inc., a subsidiary of the Company, issued $200.0 million of 7.0% Senior Notes due 2034 for net proceeds of $197.3 million. The proceeds of the offering were used to repay substantially all of a $200.0 million promissory note issued to a subsidiary of ACE in April 2004 as part of the IPO related formation transactions.  The coupon on the Senior Notes is 7.0%, however, the effective rate will be approximately 6.4%, taking into account the effect of a cash flow hedge executed by the Company in March 2004.  The Company recorded interest expense, net of amortized gain on the cash flow hedge of $3.3 million and $1.6 million in Second Quarter 2005 and 2004, respectively.  The Company recorded interest expense, net of amortized gain on the cash flow hedge of $6.7 million and $1.6 million in Six Months 2005 and 2004, respectively.  These Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Assured Guaranty Ltd.

11

Credit Facilities

$300.0 million Credit Facility

On April 15, 2005, Assured Guaranty Ltd. and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a $300.0 million three-year unsecured revolving credit facility (the “$300.0 million credit facility”) with a syndicate of banks, for which ABN AMRO Incorporated and Bank of America, N.A. acted as lead arrangers and KeyBank National Association (“KeyBank”) acted as syndication agent.  Under the $300.0 million credit facility, each of AGC, Assured Guaranty (UK) Ltd. (“AG (UK)”), a subsidiary of AGC organized under the laws of the United Kingdom, and subject to AG Re and AGRO entering into the guaranties discussed below, Assured Guaranty Ltd., AG Re and AGRO are entitled to request the banks to make loans to such borrower or to request that letters of credit be issued for the account of such borrower.  The $300.0 million credit facility replaced (1) the $250.0 million credit facility and (2)  the Letter of Credit Agreement, both discussed below.

The proceeds of the loans and letters of credit are to be used for the working capital and other general corporate purposes of the borrowers and to support reinsurance transactions.

At the closing of the $300.0 million credit facility, (i) AGC guaranteed the obligations of AG (UK) under such facility, (ii) Assured Guaranty Ltd. guaranteed the obligations of AG Re and AGRO under such facility and agreed that, if the Company Consolidated Assets (as defined in the related credit agreement) of AGC and its subsidiaries were to fall below $1.2 billion, it would, within 15 days, guarantee the obligations of AGC and AG (UK) under such facility and (iii) Assured Guaranty Overseas US Holdings Inc., as a Material Non-AGC Subsidiary (as defined in the related credit agreement), guaranteed the obligations of Assured Guaranty Ltd., AG Re and AGRO under such facility.  It was further agreed that none of Assured Guaranty Ltd., AG Re or AGRO would be able to borrow under the $300.0 million credit facility until AG Re and AGRO, as Material Non-AGC Subsidiaries, have both guaranteed the obligations of the other and of Assured Guaranty Ltd. under such facility.

The $300.0 million credit facility’s financial covenants require that Assured Guaranty Ltd. (a) maintain a minimum net worth of $1.2 billion, (b) maintain an interest coverage ratio of at least 2.5:1, and (c) maintain a maximum debt-to-capital ratio of 30%.  In addition, the $300.0 million credit facility requires that AGC: (x) maintain qualified statutory capital of at least 80% of its statutory capital as of the fiscal quarter prior to the closing date of the facility and (y) maintain a ratio of aggregate net par outstanding to qualified statutory capital of not more than 150:1.  Furthermore, the $300.0 million credit facility contains restrictions on Assured Guaranty Ltd. and its subsidiaries, including, among other things, in respect of their ability to incur debt, permit liens, become liable in respect of guaranties, make loans or investments, pay dividends or make distributions, dissolve or become party to a merger, consolidation or acquisition, dispose of assets or enter into affiliate transactions.  Most of these restrictions are subject to certain minimum thresholds and exceptions.  A default by one borrower will give rise to a right of the lenders to terminate the facility and accelerate all amounts then outstanding.  As of June 30, 2005, Assured Guaranty was in compliance with all of those financial covenants.

As of June 30, 2005, no amounts were outstanding under this facility nor have there been any borrowings under this facility.

$250.0 million Credit Facility

The Company entered into a $250.0 million unsecured credit facility (“$250.0 million credit facility”) on April 29, 2004, with a syndicate of banks, for which ABN AMRO Incorporated and Bank of America, N.A. acted as co-arrangers. Each of Assured Guaranty, AGC and AG (UK), was a party, as borrower. The $250.0 million credit facility was terminated and replaced by the $300.0 million credit facility discussed above.

The $250.0 million credit facility was a 364-day facility available for general corporate purposes, and any amounts outstanding under the facility at its expiration were due and payable one year following the facility’s expiry. As of December 31, 2004, no amounts were outstanding under this facility nor had there been any borrowings under the life of this facility.  Under the $250.0 million credit facility, AGC could borrow up to $250.0 million, Assured Guaranty Ltd. had a borrowing limit not to exceed $50.0 million, and AG (UK) had a borrowing limit not to exceed

12

$12.5 million. The $250.0 million credit facility’s financial covenants required that Assured Guaranty: (a) maintain a minimum net worth of 75% of its pro forma net worth (determined as of the first required reporting date under the facility), (b) maintain an interest coverage ratio of at least 2.5:1, and (c) maintain a maximum debt-to-capital ratio of 30%. Assured Guaranty was in compliance with all of those financial covenants. In addition, the $250.0 million credit facility required that AGC: (a) maintain qualified statutory capital of at least 80% of its statutory capital as of the fiscal quarter prior to the closing date of the facility, (b) maintain a ratio of aggregate net par outstanding to qualified statutory capital of not more than 150:1, and (c) maintain a maximum debt-to-capital ratio of 35%. AGC was in compliance with all of those financial covenants.

Letter of Credit Agreement

On November 8, 2004, Assured Guaranty Ltd., AG Re and AGRO entered into a standby letter of credit agreement (the “LOC Agreement”) with KeyBank National Association (“KeyBank”). Under the LOC Agreement, KeyBank agreed to issue up to $50.0 million in letters of credit on our behalf. The obligations of Assured Guaranty Ltd., AG Re and AGRO under the LOC Agreement were joint and several. The letters of credit were used to satisfy AG Re’s or AGRO’s obligations under certain reinsurance agreements and for general corporate purposes. Under the LOC Agreement, KeyBank issued two letters of credit, both on behalf of AGRO, with an aggregate stated amount of approximately $20.7 million.  The parties to the LOC Agreement have agreed that no additional letters of credit would be issued, extended or renewed from and after the date of the closing of the $300.0 million credit facility and letters of credit that were outstanding on such date will, unless cancelled and surrendered by the respective beneficiaries thereof, remain outstanding until their respective stated expiration dates of December 31, 2005.  The LOC Agreement contains covenants that limit debt, liens, guaranties, loans and investments, dividends, liquidations, mergers, consolidations, acquisitions, sales of assets or subsidiaries and affiliate transactions.  Most of these restrictions were subject to certain minimum thresholds and exceptions. The LOC Agreement also contained financial covenants that required the Company: (i) to maintain the ratio of consolidated debt to total capitalization at not greater than 0.30 to 1.0; (ii) to maintain consolidated net worth of at least seventy-five percent (75%) of its consolidated net worth as of June 30, 2004; and (iii) to maintain the consolidated interest coverage ratio for any test period ending on the last day of a fiscal quarter at not less than 2.50 to 1.0. In addition, the LOC Agreement provided that the obligations of KeyBank to issue letters of credit may be terminated, and our obligations under the agreement may be accelerated, upon an event of default.  As of December 31, 2004, no amounts were payable under any letter of credit issued under this facility. The LOC Agreement expired on April 28, 2005 and was replaced by the $300.0 million credit facility discussed above.

Non-Recourse Credit Facility

AGC is also party to a non-recourse credit facility with a syndicate of banks which provides up to $175.0 million specifically designed to provide rating agency-qualified capital to further support AGC’s claims paying resources. The facility expires in December 2010 and is subject to annual extension for an additional term of one year in order to maintain its term at seven periods. As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, no amounts were outstanding under this facility nor have there been any borrowings under the life of this facility.

The Company’s failure to comply with certain covenants under our credit facilities could, subject to grace periods in the case of certain covenants, result in an event of default.  This could require the Company to repay any outstanding borrowings in an accelerated manner.

Committed Capital Securities

On April 8, 2005, AGC entered into four separate agreements with four different unaffiliated custodial trusts pursuant to which AGC may, at its option, cause each of the custodial trusts to purchase up to $50.0 million of perpetual preferred stock of AGC.  The custodial trusts were created as a vehicle for providing capital support to AGC by allowing AGC to obtain immediate access to new capital at its sole discretion at any time through the exercise of the put option.  If the put options were exercised, AGC would receive $200.0 million in return for the issuance of its own perpetual preferred stock, the proceeds of which may be used for any purpose including the payment of claims.  Initially, all of the CCS Securities were issued to a special purpose pass-through trust (the “Pass-Through Trust”).  The Pass-Through Trust is a newly created statutory trust organized under the Delaware

13

Statutory Trust Act formed for the purposes of (i) issuing $200,000,000 of Pass-Through Trust Securities to qualified institutional buyers within the meaning of Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (ii) investing the proceeds from the sale of the Pass-Through Trust Securities in, and holding, the CCS Securities issued by the Custodial Trusts and (iii) entering into related agreements.  Neither the Pass-Through Trust nor the Custodial Trusts are consolidated in Assured Guaranty’s financial statements.

AGC incurred $2.0 million of investment banking fees associated with the committed capital securities in Second Quarter 2005. In addition, AGC pays approximately $0.3 million in put option premiums on a monthly basis. These expenses are presented in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income under other expenses.

7. Employee Benefit Plans and Stock Based Compensation

Employee Benefit Plans

Prior to the IPO, Assured Guaranty Ltd.’s officers and employees participated in ACE’s long-term incentive plans providing options to purchase ACE ordinary shares and restricted share unit awards.

Upon completion of the IPO, any unvested options to purchase ACE ordinary shares granted to the Company’s officers or employees under the ACE employee long term incentive plan immediately vested and any unvested restricted ACE ordinary shares were forfeited. These officers and employees generally had 90 days from the date of the IPO to exercise any vested options to acquire ACE ordinary shares. The acceleration of vesting of options to purchase ordinary shares resulted in a pre-tax charge to the Company of approximately $3.5 million.  Based upon a price of $42.79 per ACE ordinary share, the Company incurred a pre-tax charge of $7.8 million and contributed cash in the same amount to fund a trust, with a trustee, for the value of the restricted ACE ordinary shares forfeited by all of the Company’s officers and employees. These pre-tax charges took place during Second Quarter 2004.  The trust purchased common shares of Assured Guaranty Ltd. and allocated to each such individual common shares having the approximate value of the ACE ordinary shares forfeited by such individual. Based on the initial public offering price of $18.00 per common share, the trust purchased approximately 436,000 common shares. This transaction is reported in shareholders’ equity as treasury stock and unearned stock grant compensation.  The common shares will be deliverable to each individual on the 18-month anniversary of the IPO so long as during that 18-month period the individual was not employed, directly or indirectly, by any designated financial guaranty company. (The forfeiture restriction has been waived for one former employee of the Company.)  Any forfeited common shares will be delivered to us. The trustees do not have any beneficial interest in the trust. Since completion of the IPO, the Company’s officers and employees are no longer eligible to participate in ACE’s employee long-term incentive plans.   In connection with these events, Assured Guaranty received $4.5 million from ACE, for the book value of unrestricted compensation, which it recorded in unearned stock grant compensation, which is included in shareholders’ equity.

Stock Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation plans in accordance with APB 25 and related interpretations. No compensation expense for options is reflected in net income, as all options granted under the plan had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of the grant. Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share is required by FAS 123. In December 2002, the FASB issued FAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure” (“FAS 148”). FAS 148 amends the disclosure requirements of FAS 123 to require prominent disclosure in both annual and interim financial statements regarding the method of accounting for stock-based compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results.

For restricted stock awards, the Company records the market value of the shares awarded at the time of the grant as unearned stock grant compensation and includes it as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. The unearned stock grant compensation is amortized into income ratably over the vesting period.

14

As a result of the election, the Company has adjusted its net deferred tax liability, to reflect the new tax basis of the Company’s affected assets.  The additional basis is expected to result in increased future income tax deductions and, accordingly, may reduce income taxes otherwise payable by the Company.  Any tax benefit realized by the Company will be paid to AFS.   Such tax benefits will generally be calculated by comparing the Company’s affected subsidiaries’ actual taxes to the taxes that would have been owed by those subsidiaries had the increase in basis not occurred.  After a 15-year period, to the extent there remains an unrealized tax benefit, the Company and AFS will negotiate a settlement of the unrealized benefit based on the expected realization at that time.

The Company initially recorded a $49.0 million reduction of its existing deferred tax liability, based on an estimate of the ultimate resolution of the Section 338(h)(10) election.  Under the tax allocation agreement, the Company estimates that as of the IPO date, it will pay $20.9 million to AFS and accordingly has established this amount as a liability. The initial difference, which is attributable to the change in the tax basis of certain liabilities for which there is no associated step-up in the tax basis of its assets and no amounts due to AFS, resulted in an increase to additional paid-in capital of $28.1 million during 2004.  During Second Quarter 2005, we paid AFS $0.4 million reducing the liability to $20.5 million, which is included in other liabilities on the balance sheet.

10.  Segment Reporting

The Company has four principal business segments: (1) financial guaranty direct, which includes transactions whereby the Company provides an unconditional and irrevocable guaranty that indemnifies the holder of a financial obligation against non-payment of principal and interest when due, and includes credit support for credit default swaps; (2) financial guaranty reinsurance, which includes agreements whereby the Company is a reinsurer and agrees to indemnify a primary insurance company against part or all of the loss which the latter may sustain under a policy it has issued; (3) mortgage guaranty, which includes mortgage guaranty insurance and reinsurance whereby the Company provides protection against the default of borrowers on mortgage loans; and (4) other, which includes several lines of business in which the Company is no longer active, including trade credit reinsurance, title reinsurance, auto residual value reinsurance and the credit protection of equity layers of collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”).

The Company does not segregate assets and liabilities at a segment level since management reviews and controls these assets and liabilities on a consolidated basis. The Company allocates operating expenses to each segment based on a comprehensive cost study.  The other segment received its proportional share of operating expenses up to the IPO date. From the IPO date, the other segment was not allocated operating expenses. Management uses underwriting gains and losses as the primary measure of each segment’s financial performance.

The following tables summarize the components of underwriting gain for each reporting segment:

16

The following is a reconciliation of total underwriting gain to income before provision for income taxes for the periods ended:

The following table provides the lines of businesses from which each of the Company’s four reporting segments derive their net earned premiums:

The Company’s other segment consists of certain non-core lines of business that the Company has stopped writing in connection with the IPO, including equity layer credit protection, trade credit reinsurance, title reinsurance, and auto residual value reinsurance. The Company manages these exited lines of business by focusing on the net earned premiums and the underwriting gain (loss).

18

The following table provides underwriting (loss) gain by line of business for the other segment.

19

11. Subsidiary Information

The following tables present the unaudited condensed consolidated financial information for Assured Guaranty Ltd. Assured Guaranty US Holdings Inc., of which AGC is a subsidiary and AG Re and other subsidiaries of Assured Guaranty Ltd. as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET

AS OF JUNE 30, 2005

(in thousands of U. S. dollars)

20

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2004

(in thousands of U. S. dollars)