United StatesSecurities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004.
OR
___ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _______________ to _______________.
Commission File Number 001-31303
Black Hills CorporationIncorporated in South Dakota IRS Identification Number 46-0458824
625 Ninth StreetRapid City, South Dakota 57701
Registrants telephone number (605) 721-1700
Former name, former address, and former fiscal year if changed since last report
NONE
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No___
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date.
Class Outstanding at October 29, 2004
Common stock, $1.00 par value 32,469,651 shares
2
BLACK HILLS CORPORATIONCONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME(unaudited)
The accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
BLACK HILLS CORPORATIONCONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (unaudited)
4
BLACK HILLS CORPORATIONCONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS(unaudited)
5
BLACK HILLS CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements(unaudited)(Reference is made to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statementsincluded in the Companys 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K)
MANAGEMENTS STATEMENT
RECLASSIFICATIONS
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
6
7
RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
MATERIALS, SUPPLIES AND FUEL
8
ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITY
9
EARNINGS PER SHARE
10
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
11
CHANGES IN COMMON STOCK
12
CHANGES IN LONG-TERM DEBT AND NOTES PAYABLE
GUARANTEES
13
14
15
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
16
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION RELATING TO SEGMENTS OF THE COMPANYS BUSINESS
17
_________________
18
19
20
RISK MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
21
22
*crude in barrels, gas in MMBtus
23
24
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
GAIN ON SALE OF ASSETS
CONTRACT TERMINATION REVENUE
25
IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
ACQUISITION
26
PENDING ACQUISITION
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
27
28
LONG-TERM TOLLING CONTRACT AND TRANSMISSION SERVICES AGREEMENT
29
SUBSEQUENT EVENT
30
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We are a diversified energy holding company operating principally in the United States with two major business groups wholesale energy and retail services. We report our business groups in the following financial segments:
Our wholesale energy group, Black Hills Energy, Inc., engages in the production of electric power through ownership of a diversified portfolio of generating plants and the sale of electric power and capacity primarily under long-term contracts, the production of coal, natural gas and crude oil primarily in the Rocky Mountain region, and the marketing and transportation of fuel products. Our retail services group consists of our electric utility and communications segments. Our electric utility, Black Hills Power, Inc., generates, transmits and distributes electricity to an average of approximately 61,000 customers in South Dakota, Wyoming and Montana. Our communications segment provides broadband communications services to over 26,000 residential and business customers in Rapid City and the northern Black Hills region of South Dakota through Black Hills FiberCom, LLC.
In 2003, we made the decision to divest of our non-strategic power generation assets located in the Northeastern United States. On September 30, 2003, we sold our seven hydroelectric power plants located in upstate New York. In May 2004, we sold our subsidiary, Landrica Development Corp., which held some land and coal enhancement facilities that were previously reported in our Coal Mining segment.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
31
Consolidated Results
Revenue and income (loss) from continuing operations provided by each business group as a percentage of our total revenue and total income (loss) from continuing operations were as follows:
Discontinued operations in 2004 represent the operations of our 40 MW Pepperell power plant, our last power plant in the Eastern region, which is currently held for sale, and Landrica Development Corp., which was sold on May 21, 2004. Discontinued operations in 2003 represent the Pepperell plant as well as operations of the hydroelectric power plants located in upstate New York, which were sold on September 30, 2003, and Landrica Development Corp., which was sold on May 21, 2004.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2004 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2003. Consolidated income from continuing operations for the three-month period ended September 30, 2004 was $17.3 million or $0.53 per share compared to $17.7 million or $0.54 per share in the same period of the prior year.
The decrease in income from continuing operations for the three-month period ended September 30, 2004 was primarily due to the following:
32
offset by:
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003. Consolidated income from continuing operations for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004 was $36.9 million or $1.12 per share compared to $46.9 million or $1.54 per share in the same period of the prior year.
The decrease in income from continuing operations for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004 was primarily due to the following:
partially offset by:
33
Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, included a charge of $2.7 million or ($0.09) per share for change in accounting principles. The change in accounting principles reflects a $2.9 million charge related to the adoption of EITF 02-3 at our energy marketing segment and a $0.2 million benefit related to the adoption of SFAS 143 at our oil and gas and coal mining segments.
Per share results in the first nine months of 2004 were also affected by an increase of 2.4 million weighted average shares outstanding, compared to the same period in 2003, due primarily to a 4.6 million share common stock offering on April 30, 2003.
A detailed discussion of results from our operating groups and segments are included in the following pages.
34
Wholesale Energy Group
Discussion of results from our Wholesale Energy groups operating segments are as follows:
Energy Marketing
35
The following is a summary of average daily energy marketing volumes:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2004 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2003. The decrease in revenues is a result of a 31 percent decrease in crude oil volumes marketed, partially offset by a 37 percent increase in the average price per barrel marketed. Revenue decreases from crude oil marketing were offset by a similar decrease in the cost of crude oil sold.
Income from continuing operations decreased $0.7 million primarily due to decreased earnings at our gas marketing company as a result of increased compensation expense and a $1.9 million unrealized mark-to-market loss for 2004, compared to a $0.2 million unrealized gain in 2003 (see Note 15 and Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk of this Form 10-Q, for discussion of potential volatility in energy marketing earnings related to accounting treatment of certain hedging activities at our gas marketing operations). This was partially offset by increased realized gas trading margins resulting from a 45 percent increase in gas volumes marketed and increased earnings at our crude oil pipelines.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003. The decrease in revenues is a result of a 21 percent decrease in crude oil volumes marketed, partially offset by a 19 percent increase in the average price per barrel marketed. Revenue decreases from crude oil marketing were offset by a similar decrease in the cost of crude oil sold.
The segments income from continuing operations increased $2.2 million compared to 2003 primarily due to higher earnings at our crude oil pipelines and higher margins received at our crude oil marketing operations. Income from continuing operations at our gas marketing operations was flat as a $2.1 million unrealized mark-to-market loss for 2004 compared to a $3.1 million unrealized gain in 2003, resulted in a year-over-year pre-tax decrease of $5.2 million in unrealized mark-to-market adjustments at our gas marketing operations (see Note 15 and Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk of this Form 10-Q, for discussion of potential volatility in energy marketing earnings related to accounting treatment of certain hedging activities at our gas marketing operations). The impacts of unrealized mark-to-market adjustments and increased payroll, incentive compensation and increased bank fees due to higher outstanding letters of credit related to increased inventory levels were offset by higher realized gas trading margins from a 38 percent increase in gas volumes marketed in 2004 and the impact of a $3.0 million CFTC settlement impacting 2003 results.
36
Power Generation
* 2003 revenue includes $114 million of contract termination revenue (see Note 18).
(a) Capacity in service includes 40 MW in 2004 and 2003, which are currently reported as Discontinued operations.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2004 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2003. Revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2003, includes $114.0 million of contract termination revenue related to the Las Vegas II Cogeneration power plant. Excluding the contract termination revenue, revenue decreased 15 percent in 2004 compared to 2003 primarily as a result of lower revenues from our Las Vegas and Harbor facilities and lower megawatt-hours being dispatched from our Gillette gas turbine. Revenues from our Las Vegas II power plant were $4.0 million lower than the prior year primarily due to the termination of the Allegheny contract and replacement with a new long-term tolling arrangement for the capacity and energy of the Las Vegas II plant at lower rates. The new contract was entered into with Nevada Power Company and became effective April 1, 2004. Capacity revenues decreased at our Harbor facility due to the expiration of a 2003 summer peaking agreement and lower merchant sales in 2004 compared to 2003. Revenues were lower from our Gillette gas turbine due to limited opportunities for economic dispatch because of prevailing regional power market conditions. Operating expenses decreased $120.4 million, primarily the result of 2003 operating expense including a $117.2 million impairment charge for the Las Vegas II power plant, the result of the termination of the Allegheny power sales contract on the Las Vegas II power plant. Excluding the impairment charge, operating expenses decreased $3.2 million, or 11 percent, primarily due to lower fuel costs from reduced dispatch at our non-tolled power plants.
37
Income from continuing operations increased $0.1 million. Earnings results for 2004 were impacted by reduced plant revenues partially offset by lower interest expense from debt reduction from the proceeds of an asset sale and contract termination. In addition, earnings results for 2003 were negatively impacted by a $1.9 million after-tax charge for the contract termination and the asset impairment charge on the Las Vegas II power plant, partially offset by a $0.4 million after-tax benefit from a settlement with Enron.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003. Revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, includes $114.0 million of contract termination revenue related to the Las Vegas II power plant. Excluding the contract termination revenue, revenue decreased 13 percent in 2004 compared to 2003 primarily due to lower revenues from our Las Vegas and Harbor facilities. Revenues from our Las Vegas II plant were $14.3 million lower than the prior year primarily due to the termination of the Allegheny contract and replacement with a new long-term tolling arrangement for the capacity and energy of the Las Vegas II plant at lower rates. The new contract was entered into with Nevada Power Company and became effective April 1, 2004. Prior to this arrangement, the facility sold power into the market, when economic to do so, since the September 2003 termination and buyout of the long-term contract at the Las Vegas II plant. Revenues were lower from our Harbor facility due to lower merchant sales and lower capacity revenue due to the expiration of a 2003 summer peaking agreement.
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries decreased $5.9 million, primarily due to the impact of mark-to-market adjustments at certain of our power fund investments that use a fair value method of accounting.
Operating expenses decreased $117.4 million. 2003 operating expense includes a $117.2 million impairment charge for the Las Vegas II power plant, the result of the termination of the power sales contract on the Las Vegas II power plant. Excluding the impairment charge, operating expenses decreased $0.2 million due to lower maintenance expense, offset by higher fuel costs and depreciation expense.
Income from continuing operations decreased $9.3 million. Earnings results for 2004 were impacted by reduced plant revenues, lower earnings from power fund investments, higher fuel costs and higher depreciation expense, partially offset by lower maintenance expense, lower interest expense from debt reduction from the proceeds of an asset sale and contract termination, and a $1.0 million after-tax benefit from litigation settlements. In addition, 2003 earnings results were negatively impacted by a $1.9 million after-tax charge for the contract termination and the asset impairment on the Las Vegas II plant, partially offset by a $0.4 million after-tax benefit from a settlement with Enron.
38
Oil and Gas
The following is a summary of oil and natural gas production:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2004 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2003. Revenue from our oil and gas segment increased $1.2 million for the three-month period ended September 30, 2004, compared to the same period in 2003. The increase is due to higher gas and oil prices received. Average gas and oil prices received, net of hedging activity, in 2004 were $4.43/Mcf and $27.32/bbl, respectively, compared to $3.39/Mcf and $23.48/bbl in 2003. Lease operating expenses per Mcfe sold (LOE/MCFE) were 28 percent higher than 2003.
Income from continuing operations was flat compared to 2003. Earnings results for 2004 were affected by increased revenues from higher prices received offset by a 10 percent increase in operating expenses related to higher depletion costs and lease operating expenses.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003. Revenues from our oil and gas segment increased $6.7 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2004, compared to the same period in 2003. The increase in revenues is due to a 19 percent increase in volumes sold and higher gas prices received. The increase in volumes sold reflects a full nine months of production at the Mallon properties acquired in March 2003. Average gas and oil prices received, net of hedging activity, in 2004 were $4.23/Mcf and $25.13/bbl, respectively, compared to $3.94/Mcf and $25.15/bbl in 2003.
39
Income from continuing operations was flat when compared to the same period in 2003. Earnings results were affected by higher prices and volumes sold, offset by a 24 percent, or approximately $5.6 million, increase in total operating expenses related to additional operations acquired in the Mallon transaction and higher depletion and lease operating expenses. In addition, 2004 LOE/MCFE was 8 percent higher than 2003.
The following is a summary of our internally estimated economically recoverable oil and gas reserves. These estimates are measured using constant product prices of $47.66 per barrel of oil and $5.17 per Mcf of natural gas as of September 30, 2004, and $30.30 per barrel of oil and $4.69 per Mcf of natural gas as of September 30, 2003. The increases in reserves are primarily the result of increased product prices. Estimates of economically recoverable reserves for interim periods are based on independent year-end reserve studies updated for acquisitions, drilling activity, property sales and actual production during the interim period. These internally estimated reserves may differ from actual results.
Coal Mining
Three Months Ended September 30, 2004 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2003. Revenue from our mining segment decreased 23 percent for the three-month period ended September 30, 2004, compared to the same period in 2003. In September 2004, the Company reached a tax settlement with the Wyoming Department of Revenue which resulted in an adjustment to coal billings for the period of fourth quarter 2001 through the year 2003. The Company recorded a $1.7 million reduction in revenues and a corresponding reduction in mineral taxes. The Company also recorded an additional $0.4 million decrease to mineral taxes and $0.5 million decrease to interest expense related to the settlement. Revenues were also impacted by a 4 percent decrease in tons of coal sold, primarily due to a reduction in train load-out sales.
40
Operating expenses increased 2 percent, exclusive of the recording of the tax settlement, primarily due to an increase in depreciation expense, partially offset by lower overburden rates.
Income from continuing operations increased $0.3 million primarily due to a $0.4 million benefit from an income tax reserve adjustment, a $0.6 million after-tax benefit from the Wyoming tax settlement, and lower overburden expense, partially offset by increased depreciation and a decrease in tons of coal sold.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003. Revenue for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004 decreased 9 percent compared to the same period in 2003. In September 2004, the Company reached a tax settlement with the Wyoming Department of Revenue, which resulted in an adjustment to coal billings for the period of fourth quarter 2001 through the year 2003. The Company recorded a $1.7 million reduction in revenues and a corresponding reduction in mineral taxes. The Company also recorded an additional $0.4 million decrease to mineral taxes and $0.5 million decrease to interest expense related to the settlement. Revenues were also impacted by a 1 percent decrease in tons of coal sold. The decrease in tons of coal sold is primarily attributable to scheduled electric plant maintenance outages and an unscheduled outage at the Wyodak plant.
Operating expenses decreased 5 percent, exclusive of the recording of the tax settlement, primarily due to lower mining costs related to the decrease in production, lower overburden rates, lower corporate allocations and lower compensation expense, offset by increased depreciation expense.
Income from continuing operations increased $0.9 million primarily due to a $0.4 million benefit from an income tax reserve adjustment, a $0.6 million after-tax benefit from the Wyoming tax settlement, lower production costs and general and administrative costs, partially offset by lower revenues, lower interest income and increased depreciation expense.
Retail Services Group
Electric Utility
41
The following table provides certain operating statistics:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2004 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2003. Electric utility revenues increased 4 percent for the three-month period ended September 30, 2004, compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase in revenue was primarily due to a 64 percent increase in off-system electric megawatt-hour sales offset by an 11 percent decrease in average prices received from off-system sales. Firm commercial and residential electricity revenues decreased 5 percent and 12 percent, respectively, and industrial revenues increased 1 percent. Degree days, which is a measure of weather trends, were 37 percent below last year.
Electric operating expenses increased 11 percent for the three-month period ended September 30, 2004, compared to the same period in the prior year. Purchased power increased $4.3 million due to a 51 percent increase in megawatt-hours purchased, at a 5 percent decrease in the average cost per megawatt-hour. Megawatt-hours purchased increased due to uneconomic dispatch of our gas turbines and to support the increase in off-system sales. Gas costs decreased 55 percent due to a 64 percent decrease in megawatt-hours generated with our gas turbines, as prevailing prices made it more economical for us to purchase power for our peaking needs when it was available rather than generate energy from our gas turbines. The average cost per megawatt-hour of our gas generation was $67.03 for the three months ended September 30, 2004, while the average cost for purchased power was $35.25 per megawatt-hour for the same period. The decrease in fuel expense was offset by increased power marketing costs, increased health insurance costs and an increase in allocated corporate costs.
Income from continuing operations decreased $0.9 million primarily due to increases in purchased power expense, costs associated with the increase in off-system sales, health insurance expense and allocated corporate costs, partially offset by an increase in off-system electric sales and the decrease in gas costs.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003. Electric utility revenues were flat for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004, compared to the same period in the prior year. Off-system electric megawatt-hour sales increased 16 percent at a 5 percent decrease in average prices received. Revenues were impacted in part by reduced Open Access Transmission Tariff rates and plant availability resulting from unscheduled and scheduled maintenance outages during the nine month period ended September 30, 2004. The increase in revenue from off-system sales was partially offset by decreased retail sales. Residential and commercial revenues decreased 3 percent and 2 percent, respectively, and industrial revenues increased 3 percent. Degree days, which is a measure of weather trends, were 12 percent below last year.
42
Electric operating expenses increased 9 percent for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004, compared to the same period in the prior year. Purchased power increased $9.2 million due to a 38 percent increase in megawatt-hours purchased. Megawatt-hours purchased increased primarily due to a 16 percent increase in off-system megawatt-hour sales and the uneconomic dispatch of our gas turbines. Gas costs decreased 70 percent due to an 83 percent decrease in megawatt-hours generated with our gas turbines as prevailing prices made it more economical for us to purchase power for our peaking needs when it was available rather than generate energy from our gas turbines. The average cost per megawatt-hour of our gas generation was $76.33 for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, while the average cost for purchased power was $33.38 per megawatt-hour for the same period. The decrease in fuel expense was offset by increased plant maintenance costs, power marketing costs, health insurance costs and allocated corporate costs.
Income from continuing operations decreased $5.5 million primarily due to increases in purchased power expense, maintenance expense, costs associated with the increase in off-system sales, health insurance expense and allocated corporate costs, partially offset by an increase in off-system electric sales and the decrease in gas costs.
Communications
Three Months Ended September 30, 2004 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2003. Revenues from our communications group decreased $0.7 million compared to the same period in 2003. The decrease was due to the results of operations of our information technology support subsidiary, Daksoft, Inc., being included in 2003 results. Beginning in the first quarter of 2004, Daksofts focus became corporate information technology support and therefore its results are included as corporate costs. Daksofts results had an insignificant impact on net earnings. Excluding Daksofts results, revenues were flat for the communications group as increased business customer revenues were offset by a decrease in residential customer revenues and revenues from system access billings.
43
Loss from continuing operations increased $0.2 million compared to the same period in 2003. Earnings results for 2003 benefited from a reduction in property tax accruals.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003. Revenue from our communications group decreased $1.3 million compared to the same period in 2003. This was due to the results of operations of our information technology support subsidiary, Daksoft, Inc., being included in 2003 results. Beginning in the first quarter of 2004, Daksofts focus became corporate information technology support and therefore its results are included in corporate costs. Daksofts results had an insignificant impact on net earnings. Excluding Daksofts results, revenue increased $0.3 million as increased business customer revenues were partially offset by a decrease in revenues from system access billings and residential customer revenues. Revenues for the nine month period ended September 30, 2004, were approximately $1.3 million lower due to sales incentive costs related to a marketing campaign responding to a local competitors aggressive pricing pressure, primarily in the fourth quarter of 2003, offset by revenues from additional services sold to existing customers.
Loss from continuing operations decreased $0.1 million compared to the same period in 2003. In addition to the revenue impacts, earnings were also impacted by an increase in allocated corporate costs.
Earnings Guidance
Our current guidance extends through 2005 with an estimate of 2004 income from continuing operations to be between $1.70 and $1.85 per share and 2005 estimated to be $1.85 to $2.00 per share.
Critical Accounting Policies
There have been no material changes in our critical accounting policies from those reported in our 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities Exchange Commission. For more information on our critical accounting policies, see Part II, Item 7 in our 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow Activities
During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004, we generated sufficient cash flow from operations to meet our operating needs, to pay dividends on common and preferred stock, to pay our scheduled long-term debt maturities, and to fund most of our property additions. We plan to fund future property and investment additions primarily through a combination of existing cash balances, operating cash flow, increased short-term debt, long-term debt, and long-term non-recourse project financing.
Cash flows from operations decreased $148.0 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004 compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease is primarily due to the third quarter 2003 receipt of $114.0 million from Allegheny Energy Supply Company, LLC for the termination of a fifteen-year contract for capacity and energy at our Las Vegas II power plant, as well as decreased earnings, purchases of gas inventory held by our energy marketing operations and changes in other working capital.
44
During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, we had cash outflows from investing activities of $62.4 million, which was primarily related to property, plant and equipment additions in the normal course of business.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, we had cash outflows from financing activities of $114.9 million, primarily due to the repayment of debt and payment of quarterly cash dividends on stock. On January 30, 2004, we repaid $45 million of the project-level debt outstanding on the Fountain Valley project and on May 10, 2004, we repurchased $25 million of our 6.5 percent senior unsecured notes due 2013. On August 31, 2004, we called $5.9 million of Pollution Control Revenue Bonds, having a maturity date of 2010.
Dividends
Dividends paid on our common stock were $0.31 per share in each of the first, second and third quarters of 2004. As approved by our board of directors in January 2004, this reflects a 3.3 percent increase from the 2003 quarterly dividend level. The determination of the amount of future cash dividends, if any, to be declared and paid will depend upon, among other things, our financial condition, funds from operations, the level of our capital expenditures, restrictions under our credit facilities and our future business prospects.
Short-Term Liquidity and Financing Transactions
Our principal sources of short-term liquidity are our revolving credit facilities and cash provided by operations. Our liquidity position remained strong during the first nine months of 2004. As of September 30, 2004, we had approximately $79.9 million of cash unrestricted for operations and $350 million of credit through revolving bank facilities. Approximately $10.0 million of the cash balance at September 30, 2004 was restricted by subsidiary debt agreements that limit our subsidiaries ability to dividend cash to the parent company. The bank facilities consisted of a $225 million facility due August 20, 2006 and a $125 million facility due May 12, 2005. The $125 million facility replaced a $200 million facility, which was due to expire on August 27, 2004.
These bank facilities can be used to fund our working capital needs, for general corporate purposes, and to provide liquidity for a commercial paper program if implemented. At September 30, 2004, we had no bank borrowings outstanding under these facilities. After inclusion of applicable letters of credit, the remaining borrowing capacity under the bank facilities was $305.5 million at September 30, 2004.
Additional short-term liquidity is currently expected to be provided from the proceeds of forward sales of gas inventory held by our Energy Marketing segment. At September 30, 2004, the segment had $99.4 million of oil and gas inventory, substantially all of which was economically hedged at the time of purchase through either forward physical sales or forward financial sales. Sales for a substantial majority of this inventory have been made through transactions which are scheduled to settle in the fourth quarter of 2004 and the first quarter of 2005.
45
The above bank facilities include the following covenants that are common in such arrangements:
If these covenants are violated, it would be considered an event of default entitling the lender to terminate the remaining commitment and accelerate all principal and interest outstanding. As of September 30, 2004, we were in compliance with the above covenants.
Our consolidated net worth was $721.0 million at September 30, 2004, which was approximately $156.6 million in excess of the net worth we are required to maintain under the debt covenant described above. The long-term debt component of our capital structure at September 30, 2004 was 48.5 percent, our total debt leverage (long-term debt and short-term debt) was 52.5 percent, and our recourse leverage ratio was approximately 47.7 percent.
In addition, Enserco Energy Inc., our gas marketing unit, has a $150 million uncommitted, discretionary line of credit to provide support for the purchase of natural gas. As of September 30, 2004, we had a $3.0 million guarantee to the lender under this facility. This facility was recently increased from $135 million. At September 30, 2004, there were outstanding letters of credit issued under the facility of $85.3 million, with no borrowing balances outstanding on the facility. On September 30, 2004, the facility was renewed for a one year period expiring September 30, 2005.
Similarly, Black Hills Energy Resources, Inc. (BHER), our oil marketing unit, currently has a $25 million uncommitted, discretionary credit facility. The facility may be increased up to $40 million of available credit via notification to the bank at the beginning of each calendar quarter. This line of credit provides credit support for the purchases of crude oil by BHER. We provided no guarantee to the lender under this facility. At September 30, 2004, BHER had letters of credit outstanding of $7.3 million.
There were no changes in our corporate credit ratings during the first nine months of 2004.
In September 2004, the Company initiated a call notice, effective October 21, 2004, to call the entire $45 million Series AB 8.3 percent First Mortgage Bonds of Black Hills Power, Inc. The utility bonds have a maturity date of 2024.
Our ability to obtain additional financing, if necessary, will depend upon a number of factors, including our future performance and financial results, and capital market conditions. We can provide no assurance that we will be able to raise additional capital on reasonable terms or at all.
There have been no other material changes in our forecasted changes in liquidity requirements from those reported in Item 7 of our 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
46
Contractual Obligations
The long-term debt component of our contractual obligations table disclosed in our 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K has been reduced by the following:
There were no other material changes to our contractual obligations table from those reported in Items 7 of our 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Guarantees
During the first quarter of 2004, a $5.0 million performance guarantee for Black Hills Wyoming, under a power sales agreement on the Wygen Plant expired. In addition a new $0.5 million guarantee was issued related to payments under various transactions with Idaho Power Company.
During the second quarter of 2004, a $5.0 million guarantee related to a power pool agreement became effective and a $0.8 million guarantee was issued related to payments under various transactions with Southern California Edison Company.
At September 30, 2004, we had guarantees totaling $186.2 million in place.
Capital Requirements
During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, capital expenditures were approximately $65.6 million. Due to the lack of capital deployment opportunities, in July 2004 we revised our forecasted capital requirements for maintenance capital and developmental capital as follows (in thousands):
47
On July 19, 2004, we filed an Application-Declaration on Form U-1 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to formally request certain approvals in connection with becoming a registered holding company under the Public Utilities Holding Company Act of 1935, as amended (1935 Act). On November 1, 2004, we filed an amendment to the Application-Declaration, and the SEC issued a public notice of such filing establishing a public notice and comment period expiring November 24, 2004.
As a registered holding company, the 1935 Act and related regulations issued by the SEC would regulate our activities and activities of our subsidiaries with respect to the acquisition and sale of securities, acquisition and sale of utility assets, transactions among affiliates, engaging in business activities not directly related to the utility or energy business and other matters.
There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those reported in Items 1 and 2 of our 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Other than the new pronouncements reported in our 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and those discussed in Note 4 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, there have been no new accounting pronouncements issued that when implemented would require us to either retroactively restate prior period financial statements or record a cumulative catch-up adjustment.
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. We make these forward-looking statements in reliance on the safe harbor protections provided under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this Form 10-Q that address activities, events or developments that we expect, believe or anticipate will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on assumptions which we believe are reasonable based on current expectations and projections about future events and industry conditions and trends affecting our business. However, whether actual results and developments will conform to our expectations and predictions is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that, among other things, could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements, including the risk factors described above, in Items 1 and 2 of our 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC, and the following:
48
New factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all such factors, or the extent to which any such factor or combination of factors may cause actual results to differ from those contained in any forward-looking statement. We assume no obligation to update publicly any such forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
49
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The following table provides a reconciliation of the activity in energy trading contracts that meet the definition of a derivative under SFAS 133 and that were marked-to-market during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 (in thousands):
On January 1, 2003, the Company adopted EITF Issue No. 02-3. The adoption of EITF 02-3 resulted in certain energy trading activities no longer being accounted for at fair value, therefore, the above reconciliation does not present a complete picture of our overall portfolio of trading activities and our expected cash flows from those operations. EITF 98-10 was superseded by EITF 02-3 and allowed a broad interpretation of what constituted trading activity and hence what would be marked-to-market. EITF 02-3 took a much narrower view of what trading activity should be marked-to-market, limiting mark-to-market treatment primarily to only those contracts that meet the definition of a derivative under SFAS 133. At our natural gas marketing operations, we often employ strategies that include derivative contracts along with inventory, storage and transportation positions to accomplish the objectives of our producer services, end-use origination and wholesale marketing groups. Except in very limited circumstances when we are able to designate transportation, storage or inventory positions as part of a fair value hedge, SFAS 133 generally does not allow us to mark our inventory, transportation or storage positions to market.
The result is that while a significant majority of our natural gas marketing positions are fully economically hedged, we are required to mark some parts of our overall strategies (the derivatives), but are generally precluded from marking the rest of our economic hedges (transportation, inventory or storage) to market. Volatility in reported earnings and derivative positions should be expected given these accounting requirements.
50
At September 30, 2004, we had a mark to fair value unrealized loss of $12.0 million for our derivative contracts related to our natural gas marketing activities, with $12.3 million of this amount current. The sources of fair value measurements were as follows (in thousands):
The following table (in thousands) presents a reconciliation of our net derivative assets/(liabilities) under GAAP for our gas marketing subsidiary to a non-GAAP measure of the fair value of our forward book wherein all forward trading positions are marked-to-market. The approach used in determining the non-GAAP measure is consistent with our previous accounting methods under EITF 98-10.
There have been no material changes in market risk faced by us from those reported in our 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities Exchange Commission. For more information on market risk, see Part II, Item 7 in our 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K, and Note 15 of our Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act)) as of September 30, 2004. Based on their evaluation, they have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are adequate and effective to ensure that material information relating to us that is required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting
During the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
51
Part II Other Information
Legal Proceedings
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Shares acquired from certain officers and key employees under the share withholding provisions of the Restricted Stock Plan for the payment of taxes associated with the vesting of shares of Restricted Stock.
Shares acquired by a Rabbi Trust for the Outside Directors Stock Based Compensation Plan.
52
Exhibits
10.1* Form of Stock Option Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Form 8-K for August 30, 2004).
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Form 8-K for August 30, 2004).
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant's Form 8-K for August 30, 2004).
Form of Performance Share Award Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant's Form 8-K for August 30, 2004).
Form of Indemnification Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant's Form 8-K for August 30, 2004).
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of May 14, 2004 among Enserco Energy Inc., as Borrower, and Fortis Capital Corp., as administrative agent, collateral agent, documentation agent and arranger, and BNP Paribas, and U.S. Bank National Association and Societe Generale, and each other financial institution which may become a party hereto (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Form 8-K for September 30, 2004).
First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement made as of the 30th day of September, 2004, among Enserco Energy Inc., the borrower, Fortis Capital Corp., as administrative agent, documentation agent and collateral agent, BNP Paribas, U.S. Bank National Association and Societe Generale (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Form 8-K for September 30, 2004).
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a - 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Previously filed as part of the filing indicated and incorporated by reference herein.
53
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: November 9, 2004
54
EXHIBIT INDEX
ExhibitNumber Description
55