Bluelinx - 10-Q quarterly report FY

 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o      Accelerated filer þ      Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

As of May 2, 2007 there were 31,213,712 shares of BlueLinx Holdings Inc. common stock, par value $0.01, outstanding.

See accompanying notes.

See accompanying notes.

See accompanying notes.

     Basis of Presentation

     BlueLinx Holdings Inc. has prepared the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, including its accounts and the accounts of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and therefore they do not include all of the information and notes required by United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and accompanying notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Our fiscal year is a 52- or 53-week period ending on the Saturday closest to the end of the calendar year. Fiscal year 2006 contained 52 weeks. BlueLinx Corporation is the wholly-owned operating subsidiary of BlueLinx Holdings Inc. and is referred to herein as the “operating subsidiary” when necessary.

     We believe the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates and such differences could be material. In addition, the operating results for interim periods may not be indicative of the results of operations for a full year. We are exposed to fluctuations in quarterly sales volumes and expenses due to seasonal factors, with the second and third quarters typically accounting for the highest sales volumes. These seasonal factors are common in the building products distribution industry.

     We were created on March 8, 2004 as a Georgia corporation named ABP Distribution Holdings Inc. On May 7, 2004, we and our operating subsidiary acquired the assets of the Building Products Distribution Division (the “Distribution Division”) of Georgia-Pacific Corporation (“Georgia-Pacific”), pursuant to an asset purchase agreement. On August 30, 2004, ABP Distribution Holdings Inc. merged into BlueLinx Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation.

     We are a leading distributor of building products in North America with more than 3,300 employees. We offer approximately 10,000 products from over 750 suppliers to service more than 11,500 customers nationwide, including dealers, industrial manufacturers, manufactured housing producers and home improvement retailers. We operate our distribution business from sales centers in Atlanta and Denver, and our network of more than 70 warehouses.

     Earnings per Common Share

     Basic and diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period.

     Except when the effect would be anti-dilutive, the diluted earnings per share calculation includes the dilutive effect of the assumed exercise of stock options and restricted stock using the treasury stock method.

     Common Stock Dividends

     On January 22, 2007, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.125 per share on our common stock. The dividend was paid on March 30, 2007, to shareholders of record as of March 16, 2007. Our controlling shareholder, Cerberus ABP Investor LLC (“Cerberus”), received a dividend of approximately $2.3 million as a result of its ownership of 18,100,000 shares of our common stock as of the record date.

     During the first quarter of fiscal 2006, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.125 per share on our common stock. The dividend was paid on March 31, 2006 to shareholders of record as of March 15, 2006. Cerberus received a dividend of approximately $2.3 million as a result of its ownership of 18,100,000 shares of our common stock as of the record date.

     Stock-Based Compensation

     We have two stock-based compensation plans covering officers, directors and certain employees and consultants; the 2004 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”) and the 2006 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”). The plans are designed to motivate and retain individuals who are responsible for the attainment of our primary long-term performance goals. The plans provide a means whereby our employees and directors develop a sense of proprietorship and personal involvement in our development and financial success and encourage them to devote their best efforts to our business.

     The 2004 Plan provides for the grant of nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options for shares of our common stock and restricted shares of our common stock to participants of the plan selected by our Board of Directors or a committee of the Board who administer the 2004 Plan. We reserved 2,222,222 shares of common stock for issuance under the 2004 Plan. The terms and conditions of awards under the 2004 Plan are determined by the administrator for each grant.

     Unless otherwise determined by the administrator or as set forth in an award agreement, upon a “Liquidity Event,” all unvested awards will become immediately exercisable and the administrator may determine the treatment of all vested awards at the time of the Liquidity Event. A “Liquidity Event” is defined as (1) an event in which any person who is not an affiliate of us becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of fifty percent or more of the combined voting power of our then outstanding securities or (2) the sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of our business, whether by sale of assets, merger or otherwise, to a person other than Cerberus.

     On May 12, 2006 our shareholders approved the 2006 Plan. The 2006 Plan permits the grant of nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units, cash-based awards, and other stock-based awards. We reserved 1,700,000 shares of our common stock for issuance under the 2006 Plan. The terms and conditions of awards under the 2006 Plan are determined by the administrator for each grant. Awards issued under the 2006 Plan are subject to accelerated vesting in the event of a change in control as such event is defined in the 2006 Plan.

     On January 22, 2007, the Compensation Committee granted certain equity awards to Lynn A. Wentworth in connection with her agreement to serve as our Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. Ms. Wentworth received (i) 10,000 restricted shares of our common stock that vest over a one-year period from the date of the grant and (ii) an option to purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock that vests in five equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of the grant. The exercise price of the option is $11.22 and was determined based on the closing price of our common stock on the day preceding the grant date of January 22, 2007.

     On March 29, 2007, the Compensation Committee granted certain of our executive officers awards of restricted shares and performance shares of our common stock. The restricted stock awards vest on March 29, 2012, five years after the grant date. However, the awards may vest earlier in their entirety (or portion, as appropriate) upon the attainment of certain minimum performance goals. The performance shares are contingent upon the successful achievement of certain financial and strategic goals approved by the Compensation Committee for the three year period ending December 31, 2009. These awards were granted pursuant to and are subject to the terms of the 2006 Plan.

     On January 1, 2006, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) 123R,Share-Based Payment, using the modified prospective transition method. Prior to 2006, we accounted for stock awards granted to employees under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Generally, the approach in SFAS No. 123R is similar to the approach described in SFAS No. 123. However, SFAS No. 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative.

     Under the modified prospective transition method, compensation expense recognized in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 included: (a) compensation expense for all unvested share-based awards granted prior to January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with SFAS No. 123 and (b) compensation expense for all share-based awards granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with SFAS No. 123R. Results of prior periods were not restated.

     Through December 31, 2005, we accrued compensation expense assuming that all stock options granted were expected to vest. The effect of actual forfeitures was recognized as forfeitures occurred. Under SFAS No. 123R, we are required to estimate forfeitures in calculating the expense related to stock-based compensation. The adoption of SFAS No. 123R did not have a material impact on our results of operations.

     Compensation expense arising from stock-based awards granted to employees and non-employee directors is recognized as expense using the straight-line method over the vesting period. As of March 31, 2007, there was $5.6 million, $3.8 million, $2.6 million and $0.9 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options, restricted stock, performance shares and restricted stock units, respectively. The unrecognized compensation expense for these awards is expected to be recognized over a period of 3.6 years, 2.9 years, 3.0 years, and 2.8 years, respectively.

     For the first quarter of fiscal 2007 and for the first quarter of fiscal 2006, our total stock-based compensation expense was $0.9 million and $0.6 million, respectively. We also recognized related income tax benefits of $0.4 million and $0.2 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 and for the first quarter of fiscal 2006, respectively.

     The total fair value of the options vested for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 was $0.6 million. For the first quarter of fiscal 2006, there were no options that vested.

     Cash proceeds from the exercise of stock options totaled $0.3 million and $1.5 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 and for the first quarter of fiscal 2006, respectively. In addition, SFAS No. 123R requires us to reflect the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation expense as both a financing cash inflow and an operating cash outflow upon adoption. We included $0.06 million and $0.9 million of excess tax benefits in cash flows from financing activities for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 and for the first quarter of fiscal 2006, respectively.

     The following table depicts the weighted average assumptions used in connection with the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock options granted during the first quarter of fiscal 2007:

     The following table depicts the weighted average assumptions used in connection with the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock options granted during the first quarter of fiscal 2006:

     In determining the expected life, we did not rely on our historical exercise data as it does not provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate future expected lives due to limited experience of employee exercises. Instead, we followed a simplified method based on the vesting term and contractual term as permitted under SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107.

     The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our common stock.

     The range of risk-free rates used for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 and for the first quarter of fiscal 2006 was from 4.78% to 5.10% and 4.34% to 4.60%, respectively. These rates were based on the U.S. Treasury yield with a term that is consistent with the expected life of the stock options.

     Performance-based options are those options that only vest upon achievement of certain financial targets established by the Board of Directors, or a committee thereof. On February 14, 2007, the Board of Directors set the financial target for performance-based options subject to vesting criteria in 2007.

     Additional information related to our existing employee stock options for the period from December 31, 2006 to March 31, 2007, excluding performance-based options totaling 64,200 for which the financial targets have not been set, follows:

     The following table summarizes the activity of our performance shares, restricted stock and restricted stock units during the first quarter of fiscal 2007:

     The fair value of the restricted stock units will be marked-to-market each reporting period through the date of settlement. On March 31, 2007, the fair value of these awards was based on the closing price of our common stock of $10.50.

     At March 31, 2007, the aggregate intrinsic value of stock-based awards outstanding and options exercisable was $9.6 million and $0, respectively (the intrinsic value of a stock-based award is the amount by which the market value of the underlying award exceeds the exercise price of the award). The intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the first quarter of fiscal 2007 was $0.7 million. For the first quarter of fiscal 2006, the intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $4.5 million.

     We adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” which prescribes a comprehensive model for how a company should recognize, measure, present and disclose in its financial statements uncertain tax positions that the company has taken or expects to take on a tax return (including a discussion of whether to file or not to file a return in a particular jurisdiction). The cumulative effect, if any, of applying FIN 48 is to be reported as adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the year of adoption. Adoption on January 1, 2007 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

     The calculation of comprehensive income is as follows (in thousands):

     Most of our hourly employees participate in noncontributory defined benefit pension plans. These include a plan that is administered solely by us (the “hourly pension plan”) and union-administered multiemployer plans. Our funding policy for the hourly pension plan is based on actuarial calculations and the applicable requirements of federal law. We do not expect to make any contributions to the hourly pension plan in fiscal 2007. Benefits under the majority of plans for hourly employees (including multiemployer plans) are primarily related to years of service.

     Net periodic pension cost for our pension plans included the following:

     As of March 31, 2007, we had outstanding borrowings of $316 million and excess availability of $294 million under the terms of our revolving credit facility. Based on borrowing base limitations, we classify the lowest projected balance of the credit facility over the next twelve months of $228 million as long-term debt. The revolving credit facility contains customary negative covenants and restrictions for asset based loans, with which we are in compliance.

     On June 12, 2006, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement with Goldman Sachs Capital Markets (GSCM), to hedge against interest rate risks related to our variable rate revolving credit facility. The interest rate swap has a notional amount of $150 million

and the terms call for us to receive interest monthly at a variable rate equal to the 30-day LIBOR and to pay interest monthly at a fixed rate of 5.4%. This interest rate swap is designated as a cash flow hedge.

     We expect the hedge to be highly effective in offsetting changes in expected cash flows, as, at inception, the critical terms of the interest rate swap generally match the critical terms of the variable rate revolving credit facility. Fluctuations in the fair value of the ineffective portion, if any, of the cash flow hedge will be reflected in the current period earnings. For the first quarter of fiscal 2007, we recognized $0.2 million of expense related to the ineffective portion of the hedge.

     At March 31, 2007, the fair value of the interest rate swap was a liability of $3.1 million and was included in “Other long-term liabilities” on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Accumulated other comprehensive income at March 31, 2007 included the net loss on the cash flow hedge (net of tax) of $1.8 million, which reflects the cumulative amount of comprehensive loss in connection with the change in fair value of the swap.

     As of March 31, 2007, we had outstanding letters of credit totaling $10.5 million, primarily for the purposes of securing collateral requirements under the casualty insurance programs for us and for guaranteeing payment of international purchases based on the fulfillment of certain conditions.

     On June 9, 2006, certain special purpose entities that are wholly-owned subsidiaries of us entered into a $295 million new mortgage loan with the German American Capital Corporation. The new mortgage has a term of ten years and is secured by 57 distribution facilities and 1 office building owned by the special purpose entities. The stated interest rate on the new mortgage is fixed at 6.35%. German American Capital Corporation assigned half of its interest in the new mortgage loan to Wachovia Bank, National Association.

     Simultaneously with the execution of the new mortgage loan, we paid off in full our existing $165 million mortgage loan agreement with Column Financial, Inc. dated as of October 26, 2004. In connection with the termination of the existing mortgage loan, we incurred charges of $4.9 million during the second quarter of fiscal 2006, which includes unamortized debt financing costs of $3.2 million.

     The new mortgage loan requires interest-only payments for the first five years followed by level monthly payments of principal and interest based on an amortization period of thirty years. The balance of the loan outstanding at the end of ten years will then become due and payable. The principal will be paid in the following increments (in thousands):

     Temporary Staffing Provider

     We use Tandem Staffing Solutions, or Tandem, an affiliate of Cerberus, as the temporary staffing company for our office located in Atlanta, Georgia. We incurred total expenses of $344,373 and $493,958 for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 and for the first quarter of fiscal 2006, respectively. As of March 31, 2007 and December 30, 2006, we had accounts payable in the amount of $100,000 and $47,100 to Tandem, respectively.

     Consulting

     For the first quarter of fiscal 2007 and for the first quarter of fiscal 2006, we incurred expenses in the amount of $0 and $25,000, respectively, for consulting services provided to us by consultants on retainer to Cerberus. As of March 31, 2007 and December 30, 2006, we had accounts payable in the amount of $0 for these services, respectively.

     Rental Car

     For the first quarter of fiscal 2007 and for the first quarter of fiscal 2006, we incurred expenses for car rentals in the amount of $48,227 and $95,885, respectively. These services were provided by Alamo Rent-A-Car and National Car Rental, affiliates of Cerberus. As of March 31, 2007 and December 30, 2006, we had accounts payable in the amount of $8,775 and $4,197, respectively, related to these expenses.

     Environmental and Legal Matters

     We are involved in various proceedings incidental to our businesses and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations in all jurisdictions in which we operate. Although the ultimate outcome of these proceedings cannot be determined with certainty, based on presently available information management believes that adequate reserves have been established for probable losses with respect thereto. Management further believes that the ultimate outcome of these matters could be material to operating results in any given quarter but will not have a materially adverse effect on our long-term financial condition, our results of operations, or our cash flows.

     Collective Bargaining Agreements

     As of March 31, 2007, approximately 31% of our total work force is covered by collective bargaining agreements. Collective bargaining agreements representing approximately 8% of our work force will expire within one year.

     Preference Claim

     On November 19, 2004, we received a letter from Wickes Lumber, or Wickes, asserting that approximately $16 million in payments received by the Distribution Division of Georgia-Pacific Corporation during the 90-day period prior to Wickes’ January 20, 2004 Chapter 11 filing were preferential payments under section 547 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. On October 14, 2005, Wickes Inc. filed a lawsuit in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois titled “Wickes Inc. v. Georgia Pacific Distribution Division (BlueLinx),” (Bankruptcy Adversary Proceeding No. 05-2322) asserting its claim. On November 14, 2005, we filed our answer to the complaint denying liability. Although the ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined with certainty, we believe Wickes’ assertion to be without merit and, in any event, subject to one or more complete defenses, including, but not limited to, that the payments were made and received in the ordinary course of business and were a substantially contemporaneous exchange for new value given to Wickes. Accordingly, we have not recorded a reserve with respect to the asserted claim.

     Breach of Contract Claim

     On January 12, 2007, Kenexa Technology, Inc. filed suit against our operating company in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. The suit alleges that our operating company breached a five-year services agreement between it and the plaintiff and seeks unspecified monetary damages for the alleged breach of the agreement. This lawsuit is in its initial stage and it is not possible to reliably predict the outcome or any relief that could be awarded, as the litigation process is inherently uncertain. Therefore, we are unable to currently estimate the loss, if any, which could possibly be associated with this litigation. However, we dispute the validity of the claims presented by Kenexa in this suit and we currently intend to contest the allegations and claims and defend ourselves vigorously. On February 20, 2007 we filed our answer, denying liability, stating a number of affirmative defenses and requesting that the Complaint be dismissed. We also filed a counterclaim alleging breach of contract by Kenexa and seeking unspecified damages.

     Hurricane Katrina

     Hurricane Katrina caused significant damage at our distribution center in New Orleans, Louisiana. The facility ceased operations prior to the arrival of the storm on August 29, 2005. There was approximately $2.4 million in inventory located at the facility that has been declared a total loss by our insurer. Damage to the building and furniture, fixtures and equipment is expected to exceed $2.0 million. The total loss recognized related to the damage was $250,000, which is the amount of our insurance deductible. We

recognized this loss in fiscal 2005. While certain amounts have been recovered from the insurance carriers, we still have claims pending for additional recoveries. The facility has reopened but continues to operate at a reduced capacity.

     On May 3, 2007 our Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.125 per share on our common stock. The dividend will be paid on June 29, 2007 to stockholders of record as of June 15, 2007.

     The unaudited condensed consolidating financial information as of March 31, 2007 and December 30, 2006 and for the periods from December 31, 2006 to March 31, 2007 and January 1, 2006 to April 1, 2006 is provided due to restrictions in our revolving credit facility that limit distributions by BlueLinx Corporation, our wholly-owned operating subsidiary, to us, which, in turn, may limit our ability to pay dividends to holders of our common stock (see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2006, for a more detailed discussion of these restrictions and the terms of the facility). Also included in the supplemental condensed consolidated financial statements are sixty-one single member limited liability companies, which are wholly owned by us (the “LLC subsidiaries”). The LLC subsidiaries own certain warehouse properties that are occupied by BlueLinx Corporation, each under the terms of a master lease agreement. Certain of the warehouse properties collateralize a mortgage loan and none of the properties are available to satisfy the debts and other obligations of either BlueLinx Corporation or us.

     The condensed consolidating statement of operations for BlueLinx Holdings Inc. for the period from December 31, 2006 to March 31, 2007 follows (in thousands):

     The condensed consolidating statement of operations for BlueLinx Holdings Inc. for the period from January 1, 2006 to April 1, 2006 follows (in thousands):

     The condensed consolidating balance sheet for BlueLinx Holdings Inc. as of March 31, 2007 follows (in thousands):

     The condensed consolidating statement of cash flows for BlueLinx Holdings Inc. for the period from December 31, 2006 to March 31, 2007 follows (in thousands):

     The condensed consolidating statement of cash flows for BlueLinx Holdings Inc. for the period from January 1, 2006 to April 1, 2006 follows (in thousands):