Bread Financial - 10-Q quarterly report FY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” inrule 12b-2of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer þ     Accelerated filer o     Non-accelerated filer o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2of the Act).  Yes o     No þ

 

As of August 1, 2006, 80,106,147 shares of common stock were outstanding.

 

 

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by Alliance Data Systems Corporation (“ADSC” or, including its wholly owned subsidiaries, the “Company”), without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. However, the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report filed onForm 10-K/Afor the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal, recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to state fairly the results for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for any subsequent interim period or for the fiscal year.

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

For purposes of comparability, certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. Such reclassifications have no impact on previously reported net income.

 

 

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

 

 

In February 2006, the Company acquired Toronto-based iCom Information & Communications, Inc. (“ICOM”), a leading provider of targeted list, marketing data and communications solutions for the pharmaceutical industry in North America. Total consideration paid was approximately $35.6 million as of the closing date, including approximately $3.5 million which was placed in escrow for a period of up to 18 months to satisfy potential working capital adjustments and indemnification claims. As a result of this acquisition, the Company acquired approximately $10.8 million of customer contracts and $2.3 million of capitalized software. The results of operations for ICOM have been included since the date of acquisition and are reflected in our Marketing Services Segment.

 

In April 2006, the Company acquired DoubleClick Email Solutions (“DoubleClick”), one of the largest permission-based email marketing service providers, with operations across North America, Europe and Asia/Pacific. Total consideration paid was approximately $91.1 million. As a result of this acquisition, the Company acquired approximately $26.8 million of customer contracts, $2.3 million of capitalized software, and $0.4 million associated with a non-compete agreement. The results of operations for DoubleClick have been included since the date of acquisition and are reflected in our Marketing Services Segment. The purchase price allocation was as follows:

 

 

 

 

Intangible assets consist of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2006 are as follows:

 

 

 

Debt consists of the following:

 

 

As of June 30, 2006, the certificates of deposit had effective annual fixed rates ranging from 4.3% to 5.6%, and the credit facilities had a weighted average interest rate of 7.4%.

 

During January 2006, the Company entered into an additional credit agreement to increase its borrowing capacity by an incremental $300.0 million. This credit agreement included usual and customary negative

 

 

 

covenants for credit agreements of this type. Payment of amounts due under this credit agreement were secured by guaranties, pledges of the ownership interests of certain of the Company’s subsidiaries and pledges of certain intercompany promissory notes. On January 5, 2006, the Company borrowed $300.0 million under this credit agreement, which the Company used for general corporate purposes, including other debt repayment, repurchases of its common stock in connection with its stock repurchase program, mergers and acquisitions, and working capital expenditures. The Company paid in full the $300.0 million credit facility on May 16, 2006 with a portion of the proceeds from the senior notes and permitted this credit agreement to terminate pursuant to its terms on its scheduled maturity date, June 30, 2006.

 

On April 6, 2006, the Company amended its364-dayfacility to extend the maturity date from April 6, 2006 to April 5, 2007.

 

On May 16, 2006, the Company entered into a senior note purchase agreement and issued and sold $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.00% Series A Notes due May 16, 2009 and $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.14% Series B Notes due May 16, 2011. The proceeds were used to retire the $300.0 million credit facility, to repay other debt and for general corporate purposes.

 

The payment obligations under the senior notes are guaranteed by certain of the Company’s existing and future subsidiaries, currently ADS Alliance Data Systems, Inc. The Series A and Series B Notes will accrue interest on the unpaid balance thereof at the rate of 6.00% and 6.14% per annum, respectively, from May 16, 2006, payable semiannually, on May 16 and November 16 in each year, commencing with November 16, 2006, until the principal has become due and payable. The note purchase agreement includes usual and customary negative covenants and events of default for transactions of this type.

 

The senior notes are unsecured. If, as of September 30, 2006, the Company’s senior credit facilities are secured by pledges of the ownership interests of certain of its subsidiaries and pledges of certain intercompany promissory notes, the Company will grant the holders of the senior notes equal and ratable security interests in the same collateral to secure the senior notes.

 

On April 27, 2006, the Company entered into a treasury rate lock agreement with a notional amount of $250.0 million to mitigate its exposure to increases in interest rates associated with the placement of the senior notes. Effective April 28, 2006, the treasury lock was terminated and the Company realized a loss of $0.2 million.

 

 

A reconciliation of deferred revenue for the AIR MILES^®Reward Program is as follows:

 

 

 

For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company has utilized an effective tax rate of 38.7% and 38.3%, respectively, to calculate its provision for income taxes. Legislation was enacted in Texas

 

 

 

during May 2006 and in Canada during June 2006 that impacted the effective tax rates. In accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting” (“APB No. 28”), the Company’s expected annual effective tax rate for calendar year 2006 based on all known variables is estimated to be approximately 37.9% excluding the effect of the change in tax laws.

 

 

The components of comprehensive income, net of tax effect, are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

Consistent with prior periods, the Company classifies its businesses into three segments: Transaction Services, Credit Services and Marketing Services.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of, and accounted for stock-based compensation in accordance with, Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123(R)”) which supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB No. 25”). Under the fair value recognition provisions, stock-based compensation expense is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized ratably over the requisite service period. The Company elected the modified prospective method, under which prior periods are not revised for comparative purposes. The valuation provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) apply to new grants and to grants that were outstanding as of the effective date and are subsequently modified. Estimated compensation for grants that were outstanding as of the effective date will be recognized over the remaining service period using the compensation expense estimated for the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS No. 123”) pro forma disclosures, as adjusted for forfeitures.

 

 

 

 

Total stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Company’s consolidated statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2006 respectively, is as follows:

 

 

Since the amount of stock-based compensation expense recognized is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, the amount recognized in the Company’s results of operations has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS No. 123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Forfeitures were estimated based on the Company’s historical experience. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company accounted for forfeitures as they occurred in accordance with APB No. 25 and did not estimate for forfeitures. As a result, upon adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) the Company recognized a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle of $0.8 million, net of tax to reverse compensation expense recognized for those awards not expected to vest.

 

Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company accounted for stock-based awards to employees using the intrinsic value method in accordance with APB No. 25. Under the intrinsic value method, no stock-based compensation expense for employee stock options was recognized in the Company’s results of operations as the exercise price equaled the fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant. In accordance with the modified prospective transition method, the Company’s prior year financial statements have not been restated to reflect the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R).

 

The following table sets forth the pro forma amounts of net income and net income per share, for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005, that would have resulted if the Company had accounted for the stock-based awards under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123:

 

 

 

 

 

As of June 30, 2006, there was $61.1 million of unrecognized expense, adjusted for estimated forfeitures, related to non-vested, stock-based equity awards granted to employees, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately two years.

 

 

Stock option awards are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s stock. Options typically vest ratably over three years and expire ten years after the date of grant. The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using a binomial lattice model. The following table indicates the assumptions used in estimating fair value for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2006:

 

 

The following table sets forth the summary of option activity under the Company’s stock option program for the six months ended June 30, 2006:

 

 

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2006 was approximately $44.4 million.

 

 

 

 

The following table summarizes information concerning both outstanding and exercisable stock options at June 30, 2006:

 

 

The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and options exercisable as of June 30, 2006 was approximately $159.1 million and $112.7 million, respectively.

 

 

During 2006, the Company has awarded both time-based and performance-based restricted stock units. Fair value of the restricted stock is estimated on the date of grant. In accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), the Company recognizes the estimated stock-based compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, over the applicable service period.

 

Time-based restricted stock awards typically vest ratably over a three year period. Performance-based restricted stock awards vest if specified performance measures tied to the Company’s financial performance are met. The vesting provisions of 86,314 performance-based restricted stock unit awards issued in 2006 to eight employees were modified in March 2006. The vesting provisions, which were dependent on the Company’s cash earnings per share (“EPS”) growth as compared to the S&P 500, were modified such that under the new terms, the vesting provisions are dependent on the Company’syear-over-yearcash earnings per share growth. The number of shares that vest may range from zero to 200%. A minimum cash EPS growth rate of 10% is necessary for the minimum 50% vesting, 18% cash EPS growth for a 100% vesting, and 36% cash EPS growth (or more) for a maximum 200% vesting. The modification had no impact on the fair value of the award; however, it did result in a change in estimate of the most likely outcome of the number of shares to vest. The incremental stock-based compensation expense recorded as a result of the change in estimate was not material.

 

 

 

 

 

The weighted average grant-date fair value per share was $44.04 for restricted stock awards granted during the six months ended June 30, 2006.

 

 

The Company has an Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”), which provides for three month offering periods, commencing on the first trading day of each calendar quarter and ending on the last trading day of each calendar quarter. The purchase price of the common stock is 85% of the fair market value of shares on the applicable purchase date as determined by averaging the high and low trading prices of the last trading day of each quarter. An employee may elect to pay the purchase price of such common stock through payroll deductions. The maximum number of shares that were reserved for issuance under the ESPP is 1,500,000 shares, subject to adjustment as provided in the ESPP. Effective July 1, 2005, employees are required to hold any stock purchased through the ESPP for 180 days prior to any sale or withdrawal of shares. In accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), the Company has recorded compensation expense for the difference between the fair value of the stock and the purchase price of the stock.

 

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto presented in this quarterly report and the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in our Annual Report filed onForm 10-K/Afor the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

 

Our results for the first six months of 2006 included the following significant new and renewed agreements and continued selective execution of our acquisition strategy:

 

 

 

 

There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates from the information provided in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our Annual Report onForm 10-K/Afor the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure equal to net income, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, plus stock compensation expense, provision for income taxes, interest expense, net, depreciation and other amortization and amortization of purchased intangibles. Operating EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure equal to adjusted EBITDA less the change in deferred revenue plus the change in redemption settlement assets. We have presented operating EBITDA because we use the financial measure as part of our monitoring of compliance with the financial covenants in our credit facilities and senior notes. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, seniordebt-to-operatingEBITDA was 1.0x compared to a maximum ratio of 2.50x permitted in our credit facilities and 2.75x permitted in our senior note agreements. Operating EBITDA to interest expense was 18.5x compared to a minimum ratio of 3.5x permitted in our credit facilities and 15.4x compared to a minimum of 3.0x permitted in our senior note agreements. As discussed in more detail in the liquidity section of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” our credit facilities together with cash flow from operations are the two main sources of funding for our acquisition strategy and for our future working capital needs and capital expenditures. As of June 30, 2006, we had borrowings of $539.7 million outstanding under the senior notes and credit facilities and had approximately $475.3 million in unused borrowing capacity. During January 2006, we increased our borrowing capacity by an incremental $300.0 million through entering into an additional credit agreement. This credit agreement was paid in full on May 16, 2006 and permitted to terminate pursuant to its terms on its scheduled maturity date, June 30, 2006. During May 2006, we entered into a senior note purchase agreement, pursuant to which we issued and sold $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.00% Series A Notes and $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.14% Series B Notes with maturities of May 16, 2009 and May 16, 2011, respectively. We were in compliance with our covenants at June 30, 2006, and we expect to be in compliance with these covenants under these credit facilities and the senior notes during the year ending December 31, 2006.

We use adjusted EBITDA as an integral part of our internal reporting to measure the performance of our reportable segments and to evaluate the performance of our senior management. Adjusted EBITDA is considered an important indicator of the operational strength of our businesses. Adjusted EBITDA eliminates the uneven effect across all business segments of considerable amounts of non-cash depreciation of tangible assets and amortization of certain intangible assets that were recognized in business combinations. A limitation of this measure, however, is that it does not reflect the periodic costs of certain capitalized tangible and intangible assets used in generating revenues in our businesses. Management evaluates the costs of such tangible and intangible assets, the impact of related impairments, as well as asset sales through other financial measures, such as capital expenditures, investment spending and return on capital. Adjusted EBITDA also eliminates the non-cash effect of stock compensation expense. Stock compensation expense is not included in the measurement of segment adjusted EBITDA provided to the chief operating decision maker for purposes of assessing segment performance and decision making with respect to resource allocations. Therefore, we believe that adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to our investors regarding our performance and overall results of operations. Adjusted EBITDA and operating EBITDA are not intended to be performance measures that should be regarded as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, either operating income or net income as an indicator of operating performance or to cash flows from operating activities as a measure of liquidity. In addition, adjusted EBITDA and operating EBITDA are not intended to represent funds available for dividends, reinvestment or other discretionary uses, and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. The adjusted EBITDA and operating EBITDA measures presented in thisForm 10-Qmay not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies, and may not be identical to corresponding measures used in our various agreements.