Companies:
10,735
total market cap:
A$190.553 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ AUD
$
USD
๐บ๐ธ
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
Chord Energy
CHRD
#2361
Rank
A$10.66 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
A$187.63
Share price
-0.88%
Change (1 day)
7.44%
Change (1 year)
๐ข Oil&Gas
โก Energy
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Annual Reports (10-K)
Chord Energy
Quarterly Reports (10-Q)
Financial Year FY2014 Q3
Chord Energy - 10-Q quarterly report FY2014 Q3
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
ý
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2014
or
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number: 1-34776
Oasis Petroleum Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
80-0554627
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
1001 Fannin Street, Suite 1500
Houston, Texas
77002
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(281) 404-9500
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
ý
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
ý
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
ý
Accelerated filer
¨
Non-accelerated filer
o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
¨
No
ý
Number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding at
October 31, 2014
:
101,338,246
shares.
Table of Contents
OASIS PETROLEUM INC.
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30,
2014
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
1
Item 1. — Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013
1
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013
2
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
3
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013
4
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5
Item 2. — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
22
Item 3. — Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
36
Item 4. — Controls and Procedures
37
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
38
Item 1. — Legal Proceedings
38
Item 1A. — Risk Factors
38
Item 2. — Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
38
Item 6. — Exhibits
38
SIGNATURES
40
EXHIBIT INDEX
41
Table of Contents
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. — Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Oasis Petroleum Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
(Unaudited)
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
(In thousands, except share data)
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
67,194
$
91,901
Accounts receivable — oil and gas revenues
191,711
175,653
Accounts receivable — joint interest partners
197,929
139,459
Inventory
24,648
20,652
Prepaid expenses
14,253
10,191
Deferred income taxes
—
6,335
Derivative instruments
33,874
2,264
Advances to joint interest partners
97
760
Other current assets
1,972
391
Total current assets
531,678
447,606
Property, plant and equipment
Oil and gas properties (successful efforts method)
5,546,424
4,528,958
Other property and equipment
261,665
188,468
Less: accumulated depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment
(933,237
)
(637,676
)
Total property, plant and equipment, net
4,874,852
4,079,750
Assets held for sale
—
137,066
Derivative instruments
6,422
1,333
Deferred costs and other assets
44,523
46,169
Total assets
$
5,457,475
$
4,711,924
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable
$
39,550
$
8,920
Revenues and production taxes payable
248,272
146,741
Accrued liabilities
340,480
241,830
Accrued interest payable
24,902
47,910
Derivative instruments
—
8,188
Deferred income taxes
9,625
—
Advances from joint interest partners
6,776
12,829
Total current liabilities
669,605
466,418
Long-term debt
2,550,000
2,535,570
Deferred income taxes
504,735
323,147
Asset retirement obligations
41,052
35,918
Derivative instruments
—
139
Other liabilities
1,996
2,183
Total liabilities
3,767,388
3,363,375
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
Stockholders’ equity
Common stock, $0.01 par value: 300,000,000 shares authorized; 101,614,588 and 100,866,589 shares issued at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively
1,000
996
Treasury stock, at cost: 283,249 and 167,155 shares at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively
(10,602
)
(5,362
)
Additional paid-in capital
1,001,424
985,023
Retained earnings
698,265
367,892
Total stockholders’ equity
1,690,087
1,348,549
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
5,457,475
$
4,711,924
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
Table of Contents
Oasis Petroleum Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2014
2013
2014
2013
(In thousands, except per share data)
Revenues
Oil and gas revenues
$
344,706
$
286,952
$
1,030,735
$
770,445
Well services and midstream revenues
23,953
18,546
59,821
37,939
Total revenues
368,659
305,498
1,090,556
808,384
Expenses
Lease operating expenses
44,361
21,831
124,903
59,586
Well services and midstream operating expenses
14,922
10,319
34,611
19,877
Marketing, transportation and gathering expenses
7,306
5,688
19,606
19,856
Production taxes
34,584
26,823
100,880
70,309
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
106,972
72,728
295,520
205,779
Exploration expenses
1,100
463
1,955
2,712
Impairment of oil and gas properties
1,439
56
2,243
762
General and administrative expenses
23,915
16,728
68,186
47,238
Total expenses
234,599
154,636
647,904
426,119
Gain on sale of properties
43
—
187,076
—
Operating income
134,103
150,862
629,728
382,265
Other income (expense)
Net gain (loss) on derivative instruments
103,426
(39,817
)
20,253
(41,838
)
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest
(39,420
)
(22,854
)
(118,568
)
(65,429
)
Other income (expense)
(38
)
23
250
1,097
Total other income (expense)
63,968
(62,648
)
(98,065
)
(106,170
)
Income before income taxes
198,071
88,214
531,663
276,095
Income tax expense
76,484
33,715
201,290
102,626
Net income
$
121,587
$
54,499
$
330,373
$
173,469
Earnings per share:
Basic (Note 12)
$
1.22
$
0.59
$
3.32
$
1.88
Diluted (Note 12)
1.21
0.59
3.29
1.87
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic (Note 12)
99,715
92,449
99,647
92,408
Diluted (Note 12)
100,306
92,836
100,356
92,838
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
Oasis Petroleum Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
(Unaudited)
Common Stock
Treasury Stock
Additional
Paid-in Capital
Retained Earnings
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
Shares
Amount
Shares
Amount
(In thousands)
Balance as of December 31, 2013
100,699
$
996
167
$
(5,362
)
$
985,023
$
367,892
$
1,348,549
Fees (2013 issuance of common stock)
—
—
—
—
(176
)
—
(176
)
Stock-based compensation
748
—
—
—
16,581
—
16,581
Vesting of restricted shares
—
4
—
—
(4
)
—
—
Treasury stock – tax withholdings
(116
)
—
116
(5,240
)
—
—
(5,240
)
Net income
—
—
—
—
—
330,373
330,373
Balance as of September 30, 2014
101,331
$
1,000
283
$
(10,602
)
$
1,001,424
$
698,265
$
1,690,087
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
Oasis Petroleum Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2014
2013
(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income
$
330,373
$
173,469
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
295,520
205,779
Gain on sale of properties
(187,076
)
—
Impairment of oil and gas properties
2,243
762
Deferred income taxes
197,548
102,244
Derivative instruments
(20,253
)
41,838
Stock-based compensation expenses
15,755
8,411
Deferred financing costs amortization and other
5,209
2,693
Working capital and other changes:
Change in accounts receivable
(62,581
)
(67,487
)
Change in inventory
(4,089
)
(8,820
)
Change in prepaid expenses
(3,179
)
(5,175
)
Change in other current assets
(1,581
)
(138
)
Change in other assets
(3,069
)
(63
)
Change in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
108,788
82,246
Change in other liabilities
(116
)
922
Net cash provided by operating activities
673,492
536,681
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures
(972,763
)
(654,175
)
Acquisition of oil and gas properties
(26,126
)
(133,061
)
Increase in restricted cash
—
(986,210
)
Proceeds from sale of properties
324,938
—
Costs related to sale of properties
(2,337
)
—
Redemptions of short-term investments
—
25,000
Derivative settlements
(24,773
)
(5,135
)
Advances from joint interest partners
(6,053
)
(7,965
)
Net cash used in investing activities
(707,114
)
(1,761,546
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes
—
1,000,000
Proceeds from revolving credit facility
370,000
160,000
Principal payments on revolving credit facility
(355,570
)
—
Debt issuance costs
(99
)
(21,718
)
Purchases of treasury stock
(5,240
)
(1,424
)
Other
(176
)
—
Net cash provided by financing activities
8,915
1,136,858
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(24,707
)
(88,007
)
Cash and cash equivalents:
Beginning of period
91,901
213,447
End of period
$
67,194
$
125,440
Supplemental non-cash transactions:
Change in accrued capital expenditures
$
99,103
$
10,530
Change in asset retirement obligations
5,134
4,173
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
OASIS PETROLEUM INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1. Organization and Operations of the Company
Organization
Oasis Petroleum Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Oasis” or the “Company”) was formed on February 25, 2010, pursuant to the laws of the State of Delaware, to become a holding company for Oasis Petroleum LLC (“OP LLC”), the Company’s predecessor, which was formed as a Delaware limited liability company on February 26, 2007. In connection with its initial public offering in June 2010 and related corporate reorganization, the Company acquired all of the outstanding membership interests in OP LLC in exchange for shares of the Company’s common stock. In 2007, Oasis Petroleum North America LLC (“OPNA”), a Delaware limited liability company, was formed to conduct domestic oil and natural gas exploration and production activities. In 2011, the Company formed Oasis Well Services LLC (“OWS”), a Delaware limited liability company, to provide well services to OPNA, and Oasis Petroleum Marketing LLC (“OPM”), a Delaware limited liability company, to provide marketing services to OPNA. In 2013, the Company formed Oasis Midstream Services LLC (“OMS”), a Delaware limited liability company, to provide midstream services to OPNA. As part of the formation of OMS, the Company transferred substantially all of its salt water disposal and other midstream assets from OPNA to OMS.
Nature of Business
The Company is an independent exploration and production company focused on the acquisition and development of unconventional oil and natural gas resources in the Williston Basin. The Company’s proved and unproved oil and natural gas properties are located in the North Dakota and Montana areas of the Williston Basin and are owned by OPNA. The Company also operates an oil and gas marketing business (OPM), a well services business (OWS) and a midstream services business (OMS), all of which are complementary to its primary development and production activities. Both OWS and OMS are separate reportable business segments, while OPM is included in the Company’s exploration and production segment.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of Oasis and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have not been audited by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, except that the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at
December 31, 2013
is derived from audited financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments necessary for the fair presentation, have been included. Management has made certain estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts in the condensed consolidated financial statements and disclosures of contingencies. Actual results may differ from those estimates. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of annual results.
These interim financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regarding interim financial reporting. Certain disclosures have been condensed or omitted from these financial statements. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for complete consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2013
(“
2013
Annual Report”).
Significant Accounting Policies
There have been no material changes to the Company’s critical accounting policies and estimates from those disclosed in the
2013
Annual Report other than those noted below.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Revenue recognition.
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(“ASU 2014-09”). The objective of ASU 2014-09 is greater consistency and comparability across industries by using a five-step model to recognize revenue from customer contracts. ASU 2014-09 also contains some new disclosure requirements under GAAP and is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that adopting this new guidance will have on its financial position, cash flows and results of operations.
3. Inventory
5
Table of Contents
Equipment and materials consist primarily of proppant, chemicals, tubular goods, well equipment to be used in future drilling or repair operations and well fracturing equipment, all of which are stated at the lower of cost or market value with cost determined on an average cost method. Crude oil inventory includes oil in tank and linefill and is stated at the lower of average cost or market value. Inventory consists of the following:
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
(In thousands)
Equipment and materials
$
15,041
$
11,669
Crude oil inventory
9,607
8,983
Total inventory
$
24,648
$
20,652
4. Property, Plant and Equipment
The following table sets forth the Company’s property, plant and equipment:
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
(In thousands)
Proved oil and gas properties
(1)
$
4,717,065
$
3,713,525
Less: Accumulated depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment
(890,785
)
(612,380
)
Proved oil and gas properties, net
3,826,280
3,101,145
Unproved oil and gas properties
829,359
815,433
Total oil and gas properties, net
4,655,639
3,916,578
Other property and equipment
261,665
188,468
Less: Accumulated depreciation
(42,452
)
(25,296
)
Other property and equipment, net
219,213
163,172
Total property, plant and equipment, net
$
4,874,852
$
4,079,750
__________________
(1)
Included in the Company’s proved oil and gas properties are estimates of future asset retirement costs of
$36.4 million
and
$32.6 million
at
September 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
, respectively.
As a result of expiring leases and periodic assessments of unproved properties, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges on its unproved oil and natural gas properties of
$1.4 million
and
$2.2 million
for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
, respectively, and
$0.1 million
and
$0.8 million
for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
, respectively. No impairment charges on proved oil and natural gas properties were recorded for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2014
or
2013
.
5. Divestiture
On March 5, 2014, the Company completed the sale of certain non-operated properties in its Sanish project area and other non-operated leases adjacent to its Sanish position (the “Sanish Divestiture”) for cash proceeds of approximately
$324.9 million
, which includes, and is subject to further, customary post close adjustments. The Company recognized a
$187.1 million
gain on sale of properties in its Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the
nine months ended
September 30, 2014
. The transaction was structured as an Internal Revenue Code Section 1031 like-kind exchange for tax purposes and as such did not give rise to any current taxable gain.
6. Fair Value Measurements
In accordance with the FASB’s authoritative guidance on fair value measurements, the Company’s financial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company recognizes its non-financial assets and liabilities, such as asset retirement obligations (“ARO”) and proved oil and natural gas properties upon impairment, at fair value on a non-recurring basis.
As defined in the authoritative guidance, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). To estimate fair value, the Company utilizes market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated or generally unobservable.
6
Table of Contents
The authoritative guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (“Level 1” measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (“Level 3” measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1
— Unadjusted quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
Level 2
— Pricing inputs, other than unadjusted quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. Level 2 includes those financial instruments that are valued using models or other valuation methodologies. These models are primarily industry-standard models that consider various assumptions, including quoted forward prices for commodities, time value, volatility factors and current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures. Substantially all of these assumptions are observable in the marketplace throughout the full term of the instrument and can be derived from observable data or are supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace.
Level 3
— Pricing inputs are generally less observable from objective sources, requiring internally developed valuation methodologies that result in management’s best estimate of fair value.
Financial Assets and Liabilities
As required, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input requires judgment and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels. The following tables set forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis:
At fair value as of September 30, 2014
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In thousands)
Assets:
Money market funds
$
742
$
—
$
—
$
742
Commodity derivative instruments (see Note 7)
—
40,296
—
40,296
Total assets
$
742
$
40,296
$
—
$
41,038
At fair value as of December 31, 2013
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(In thousands)
Assets:
Money market funds
$
742
$
—
$
—
$
742
Commodity derivative instruments (see Note 7)
—
3,597
—
3,597
Total assets
$
742
$
3,597
$
—
$
4,339
Liabilities:
Commodity derivative instruments (see Note 7)
$
—
$
8,327
$
—
$
8,327
Total liabilities
$
—
$
8,327
$
—
$
8,327
The Level 1 instruments presented in the tables above consist of money market funds included in cash and cash equivalents on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at
September 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
. The Company’s money market funds represent cash equivalents backed by the assets of high-quality major banks and financial institutions. The Company identifies the money market funds as Level 1 instruments because the money market funds have daily liquidity, quoted prices for the underlying investments can be obtained, and there are active markets for the underlying investments.
The Level 2 instruments presented in the tables above consist of commodity derivative instruments, which include oil collars, swaps and deferred premium puts. The fair values of the Company’s commodity derivative instruments are based upon a third-party preparer’s calculation using mark-to-market valuation reports provided by the Company’s counterparties for monthly settlement purposes to determine the valuation of its derivative instruments. The Company has the third-party preparer evaluate other readily available market prices for its derivative contracts as there is an active market for these contracts. The
7
Table of Contents
third-party preparer performs its independent valuation using a moment matching method similar to Turnbull-Wakeman for Asian options. The significant inputs used are crude oil prices, volatility, skew, discount rate and the contract terms of the derivative instruments. However, the Company does not have access to the specific proprietary valuation models or inputs used by its counterparties or third-party preparer. The Company compares the third-party preparer’s valuation to counterparty valuation statements, investigating any significant differences, and analyzes monthly valuation changes in relation to movements in crude oil forward price curves. The determination of the fair value for derivative instruments also incorporates a credit adjustment for non-performance risk, as required by GAAP. The Company calculates the credit adjustment for derivatives in a net asset position using current credit default swap values for each counterparty. The credit adjustment for derivatives in a net liability position is based on the Company’s market credit spread. Based on these calculations, the Company recorded an adjustment to reduce the fair value of its net derivative asset by
$0.1 million
at
September 30, 2014
and an adjustment to reduce the fair value of its net derivative liability by
$0.2 million
at
December 31, 2013
.
Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments
The Company’s financial instruments, including certain cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable, are carried at cost, which approximates fair value due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. At
September 30, 2014
, the Company’s cash equivalents were all Level 1 assets. The carrying amount of the Company’s long-term debt reported in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at
September 30, 2014
is
$2,550.0 million
, which includes
$2,200.0 million
of senior unsecured notes and
$350.0 million
of borrowings under the revolving credit facility (see Note 8 – Long-Term Debt). The fair value of the Company’s senior unsecured notes, which are Level 1 liabilities, is
$2,310.5 million
at
September 30, 2014
.
Nonfinancial Assets and Liabilities
Asset retirement obligations.
The carrying amount of the Company’s ARO in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at
September 30, 2014
is
$41.5 million
(see Note 9 – Asset Retirement Obligations). The Company determines the ARO by calculating the present value of estimated cash flows related to the liability. Estimating the future ARO requires management to make estimates and judgments regarding timing and existence of a liability, as well as what constitutes adequate restoration. Inherent in the fair value calculation are numerous assumptions and judgments, including the ultimate costs, inflation factors, credit adjusted discount rates, timing of settlement and changes in the legal, regulatory, environmental and political environments. These assumptions represent Level 3 inputs. To the extent future revisions to these assumptions impact the fair value of the existing ARO liability, a corresponding adjustment is made to the related asset.
Impairment.
The Company reviews its proved oil and natural gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate that a decline in the recoverability of their carrying value may have occurred. The Company estimates the expected undiscounted future cash flows of its oil and natural gas properties and compares such undiscounted future cash flows to the carrying amount of the oil and natural gas properties to determine if the carrying amount is recoverable. If the carrying amount exceeds the estimated undiscounted future cash flows, the Company will adjust the carrying amount of the oil and natural gas properties to fair value. The factors used to determine fair value are subject to management’s judgment and expertise and include, but are not limited to, recent sales prices of comparable properties, the present value of future cash flows, net of estimated operating and development costs using estimates of proved reserves, future commodity pricing, future production estimates, anticipated capital expenditures and various discount rates commensurate with the risk and current market conditions associated with realizing the expected cash flows projected. These assumptions represent Level 3 inputs. No impairment charges on proved oil and natural gas properties were recorded for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2014
or
2013
.
7. Derivative Instruments
The Company utilizes derivative financial instruments to manage risks related to changes in oil prices. As of
September 30, 2014
, the Company utilized two-way and three-way costless collar options, swaps, swaps with sub-floors and deferred premium puts to reduce the volatility of oil prices on a significant portion of its future expected oil production. A two-way collar is a combination of options: a sold call and a purchased put. The purchased put establishes a minimum price (floor) and the sold call establishes a maximum price (ceiling) the Company will receive for the volumes under contract. A three-way collar is a combination of options: a sold call, a purchased put and a sold put. The purchased put establishes a minimum price (floor), unless the market price falls below the sold put (sub-floor), at which point the minimum price would be the NYMEX West Texas Intermediate (“WTI”) crude oil index price plus the difference between the purchased put and the sold put strike price. The sold call establishes a maximum price (ceiling) the Company will receive for the volumes under contract. A swap is a sold call and a purchased put established at the same price (both ceiling and floor). A swap with a sub-floor is a swap coupled with a sold put (sub-floor) at which point the minimum price would be the WTI crude oil index price plus the difference between the swap and the sold put strike price. For the deferred premium puts, the Company agrees to pay a premium to the
8
Table of Contents
counterparty at the time of settlement. At settlement, if the WTI price is below the floor price of the put, the Company receives the difference between the floor price and the WTI price multiplied by the contract volumes, less the premium. If the WTI price settles at or above the floor price of the put, the Company pays only the premium.
All derivative instruments are recorded on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as either assets or liabilities measured at fair value (see Note 6 – Fair Value Measurements). The Company has not designated any derivative instruments as hedges for accounting purposes and does not enter into such instruments for speculative trading purposes. If a derivative does not qualify as a hedge or is not designated as a hedge, the changes in fair value are recognized in the other income (expense) section of the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations as a net gain or loss on derivative instruments. The Company’s cash flow is only impacted when the actual settlements under the derivative contracts result in making a payment to or receiving a payment from the counterparty. These cash settlements are reflected as investing activities in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.
As of
September 30, 2014
, the Company had the following outstanding commodity derivative instruments, all of which settle monthly based on the average WTI crude oil index price:
Weighted Average Deferred Premium
Settlement
Period
Derivative
Instrument
Total Notional
Amount of Oil
Weighted Average Prices
Fair Value
Asset
(Liability)
Swap
Sub-Floor
Floor
Ceiling
(Barrels)
($/Barrel)
(In thousands)
2014
Two-way collars
1,088,000
$
95.07
$
106.42
$
4,893
2014
Three-way collars
842,000
$
70.55
$
90.55
$
105.16
1,066
2014
Swaps
994,000
$
96.32
3,942
2014
Swaps with sub-floors
552,000
$
92.60
$
70.00
690
2015
Two-way collars
2,388,500
$
87.98
$
103.21
9,574
2015
Three-way collars
263,500
$
70.59
$
90.59
$
105.25
869
2015
Swaps
5,263,500
$
90.81
14,093
2015
Swaps with sub-floors
186,000
$
92.60
$
70.00
538
2015
Deferred premium puts
1,086,000
$
90.00
$
2.55
2,919
2016
Two-way collars
155,000
$
86.00
$
103.42
692
2016
Swaps
310,000
$
90.15
1,020
$
40,296
The following table summarizes the location and fair value of all outstanding commodity derivative instruments recorded in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet for the periods presented:
Fair Value of Derivative Instrument Assets (Liabilities)
Fair Value
Commodity
Balance Sheet Location
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
(In thousands)
Crude oil
Derivative instruments — current assets
$
33,874
$
2,264
Crude oil
Derivative instruments — non-current assets
6,422
1,333
Crude oil
Derivative instruments — current liabilities
—
(8,188
)
Crude oil
Derivative instruments — non-current liabilities
—
(139
)
Total derivative instruments
$
40,296
$
(4,730
)
The following table summarizes the location and amounts of gains and losses from the Company’s commodity derivative instruments for the periods presented:
9
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Statement of Operations Location
2014
2013
2014
2013
(In thousands)
Non-cash change in fair value of derivative instruments
Net gain (loss) on derivative instruments
$
114,555
$
(31,750
)
$
45,026
$
(36,703
)
Derivative settlements
Net gain (loss) on derivative instruments
(11,129
)
(8,067
)
(24,773
)
(5,135
)
Total net gain (loss) on derivative instruments
$
103,426
$
(39,817
)
$
20,253
$
(41,838
)
In accordance with the FASB’s authoritative guidance on disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities, the Company is required to disclose both gross and net information about instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position as well as instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting agreement. The Company’s derivative instruments are presented as assets and liabilities on a net basis by counterparty, as all counterparty contracts provide for net settlement. No margin or collateral balances are deposited with counterparties, and as such, gross amounts are offset to determine the net amounts presented in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The following tables summarize gross and net information about the Company’s commodity derivative instruments for the periods presented:
Offsetting of Derivative Assets
Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets
Gross Amounts Offset
in the Balance Sheet
Net Amounts of Assets Presented
in the Balance Sheet
(In thousands)
As of September 30, 2014
$
56,752
$
(16,456
)
$
40,296
As of December 31, 2013
22,743
(19,146
)
3,597
Offsetting of Derivative Liabilities
Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities
Gross Amounts Offset
in the Balance Sheet
Net Amounts of Liabilities Presented
in the Balance Sheet
(In thousands)
As of September 30, 2014
$
16,456
$
(16,456
)
$
—
As of December 31, 2013
27,473
(19,146
)
8,327
8. Long-Term Debt
Senior unsecured notes.
On September 24, 2013, the Company issued
$1,000.0 million
of
6.875%
senior unsecured notes due
March 15, 2022
(the “2022 Notes”). The issuance of the 2022 Notes resulted in aggregate net proceeds to the Company of
$983.6 million
. The Company used the proceeds from the 2022 Notes to fund the acquisition of oil and gas properties in its West Williston project area. On June 30, 2014, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-4 with the SEC to allow the holders of the 2022 Notes to exchange the 2022 Notes for the same principal amount of a new issue of notes with substantially identical terms, except the new notes are freely transferable under the Securities Act of 1933. The registration statement was declared effective on July 16, 2014, and the Company closed the exchange offer on August 15, 2014.
During 2011 and 2012, the Company issued
$400.0 million
of
7.25%
senior unsecured notes due
February 1, 2019
(the “2019 Notes”),
$400.0 million
of
6.5%
senior unsecured notes due
November 1, 2021
(the “2021 Notes”) and
$400.0 million
of
6.875%
senior unsecured notes due
January 15, 2023
(the “2023 Notes,” and together with the 2022 Notes, 2019 Notes and 2021 Notes, the “Notes”). The issuance of the 2019 Notes, 2021 Notes and the 2023 Notes resulted in aggregate net proceeds to the Company of
$1,175.8 million
. The Company used the proceeds from the 2019 Notes, 2021 Notes and the 2023 Notes to fund its exploration, development and acquisition program and for general corporate purposes. Interest on the Notes is payable
semi-annually
in arrears.
The Notes were issued under indentures containing provisions that are substantially the same, as amended and supplemented by supplemental indentures (collectively, the “Indentures”), among the Company, along with its material subsidiaries (the “Guarantors”), and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”). The Notes are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by the Company’s Guarantors. These guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several among the Guarantors, subject to certain customary release provisions, as follows:
•
in connection with any sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of that Guarantor (including by way of merger or consolidation) to a person that is not (either before or after giving effect to such transaction) the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary (as defined in the Indentures) of the Company;
10
Table of Contents
•
in connection with any sale or other disposition of the capital stock of that Guarantor (including by way of merger or consolidation) to a person that is not (either before or after giving effect to such transaction) the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company, such that, immediately after giving effect to such transaction, such Guarantor would no longer constitute a subsidiary of the Company;
•
if the Company designates any Restricted Subsidiary that is a Guarantor to be an unrestricted subsidiary in accordance with the Indenture;
•
upon legal defeasance or satisfaction and discharge of the Indenture; or
•
upon the liquidation or dissolution of a Guarantor, provided no event of default occurs under the Indentures as a result thereof.
The Company has certain options to redeem up to
35%
of the Notes at a certain redemption price based on a percentage of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date, with the proceeds of certain equity offerings so long as the redemption occurs within
180
days of completing such equity offering and at least
65%
of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes remains outstanding after such redemption. Prior to certain dates, the Company has the option to redeem some or all of the Notes for cash at certain redemption prices equal to a certain percentage of their principal amount plus an applicable make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. The Company estimates that the fair value of these redemption options is immaterial at
September 30, 2014
and December 31, 2013.
The Indentures restrict the Company’s ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to: (i) incur additional debt or enter into sale and leaseback transactions; (ii) pay distributions on, redeem or repurchase equity interests; (iii) make certain investments; (iv) incur liens; (v) enter into transactions with affiliates; (vi) merge or consolidate with another company; and (vii) transfer and sell assets. These covenants are subject to certain exceptions and qualifications. If at any time when the Notes are rated investment grade by both Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. and Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services and no Default (as defined in the Indentures) has occurred and is continuing, many of such covenants will terminate and the Company and its subsidiaries will cease to be subject to such covenants.
The Indentures contain customary events of default, including:
•
default in any payment of interest on any Note when due, continued for 30 days;
•
default in the payment of principal or premium, if any, on any Note when due;
•
failure by the Company to comply with its other obligations under the Indentures, in certain cases subject to notice and grace periods;
•
payment defaults and accelerations with respect to other indebtedness of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries in the aggregate principal amount of
$10.0 million
or more;
•
certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization of the Company or a Significant Subsidiary (as defined in the Indentures) or group of Restricted Subsidiaries that, taken together, would constitute a Significant Subsidiary;
•
failure by the Company or any Significant Subsidiary or group of Restricted Subsidiaries that, taken together, would constitute a Significant Subsidiary to pay certain final judgments aggregating in excess of
$10.0 million
within 60 days; and
•
any guarantee of the Notes by a Guarantor ceases to be in full force and effect, is declared null and void in a judicial proceeding or is denied or disaffirmed by its maker.
Senior secured revolving line of credit.
On April 5, 2013, the Company, as parent, and OPNA, as borrower, entered into a second amended and restated credit agreement (the “Second Amended Credit Facility”), which has a maturity date of
April 5, 2018
. The Second Amended Credit Facility is restricted to the borrowing base, which is reserve-based and subject to semi-annual redeterminations on April 1 and October 1 of each year. On September 30, 2014, the lenders under the Second Amended Credit Facility (the “Lenders”) completed their regular semi-annual redetermination of the borrowing base scheduled for October 1, 2014, resulting in an increase to the borrowing base from $
1,750.0 million
to $
2,000.0 million
. However, the Company elected to limit the Lenders’ aggregate commitment to
$1,500.0 million
. The overall senior secured line of credit under the Second Amended Credit Facility is
$2,500.0 million
as of
September 30, 2014
.
Borrowings under the Second Amended Credit Facility are collateralized by perfected first priority liens and security interests on substantially all of the Company’s assets, including mortgage liens on oil and natural gas properties having at least
80%
of the reserve value as determined by reserve reports.
11
Table of Contents
Borrowings under the Second Amended Credit Facility are subject to varying rates of interest based on (1) the total outstanding borrowings (including the value of all outstanding letters of credit) in relation to the borrowing base and (2) whether the loan is a London interbank offered rate (“LIBOR”) loan or a domestic bank prime interest rate loan (defined in the Second Amended Credit Facility as an Alternate Based Rate or “ABR” loan). As of
September 30, 2014
, any outstanding LIBOR and ABR loans bore their respective interest rates plus the applicable margin indicated in the following table:
Ratio of Total Outstanding Borrowings to Borrowing Base
Applicable Margin
for LIBOR Loans
Applicable Margin
for ABR Loans
Less than .25 to 1
1.50
%
0.00
%
Greater than or equal to .25 to 1 but less than .50 to 1
1.75
%
0.25
%
Greater than or equal to .50 to 1 but less than .75 to 1
2.00
%
0.50
%
Greater than or equal to .75 to 1 but less than .90 to 1
2.25
%
0.75
%
Greater than or equal to .90 to 1
2.50
%
1.00
%
An ABR loan may be repaid at any time before the scheduled maturity of the Second Amended Credit Facility upon the Company providing advance notification to the Lenders. Interest is paid quarterly on ABR loans based on the number of days an ABR loan is outstanding as of the last business day in March, June, September and December. The Company has the option to convert an ABR loan to a LIBOR-based loan upon providing advance notification to the Lenders. The minimum available loan term is one month and the maximum loan term is six months for LIBOR-based loans. Interest for LIBOR loans is paid upon maturity of the loan term. Interim interest is paid every three months for LIBOR loans that have loan terms greater than three months in duration. At the end of a LIBOR loan term, the Second Amended Credit Facility allows the Company to elect to repay the borrowing, continue a LIBOR loan with the same or a differing loan term or convert the borrowing to an ABR loan.
On a quarterly basis, the Company pays a
0.375%
(as of
September 30, 2014
) annualized commitment fee on the average amount of borrowing base capacity not utilized during the quarter and fees calculated on the average amount of letter of credit balances outstanding during the quarter.
As of
September 30, 2014
, the Second Amended Credit Facility contained covenants that included, among others:
•
a prohibition against incurring debt, subject to permitted exceptions;
•
a prohibition against making dividends, distributions and redemptions, subject to permitted exceptions;
•
a prohibition against making investments, loans and advances, subject to permitted exceptions;
•
restrictions on creating liens and leases on the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries, subject to permitted exceptions;
•
restrictions on merging and selling assets outside the ordinary course of business;
•
restrictions on use of proceeds, investments, transactions with affiliates or change of principal business;
•
a provision limiting oil and natural gas derivative financial instruments;
•
a requirement that the Company maintain a ratio of consolidated EBITDAX (as defined in the Second Amended Credit Facility) to consolidated Interest Expense (as defined in the Second Amended Credit Facility) of no less than
2.5
to
1.0
for the four quarters ended on the last day of each quarter; and
•
a requirement that the Company maintain a Current Ratio (as defined in the Second Amended Credit Facility) of consolidated current assets (including unused borrowing base capacity and with exclusions as described in the Second Amended Credit Facility) to consolidated current liabilities (with exclusions as described in the Second Amended Credit Facility) of no less than
1.0
to 1.0 as of the last day of any fiscal quarter.
The Second Amended Credit Facility contains customary events of default. If an event of default occurs and is continuing, the Lenders may declare all amounts outstanding under the Second Amended Credit Facility to be immediately due and payable.
As of
September 30, 2014
, the Company had
$350.0 million
of LIBOR loans and
$5.2 million
of outstanding letters of credit issued under the Second Amended Credit Facility, resulting in an unused borrowing base committed capacity of
$1,144.8 million
. As of
September 30, 2014
, the weighted average interest rate was
1.7%
on borrowings outstanding under the Second
12
Table of Contents
Amended Credit Facility. The Company was in compliance with the financial covenants of the Second Amended Credit Facility as of
September 30, 2014
.
Deferred financing costs.
As of
September 30, 2014
, the Company had
$37.1 million
of deferred financing costs related to the Notes and the Second Amended Credit Facility. The deferred financing costs are included in deferred costs and other assets on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at
September 30, 2014
and are being amortized over the respective terms of the Notes and the Second Amended Credit Facility. Amortization of deferred financing costs recorded for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2014
was
$1.6 million
and $
4.8 million
, respectively, and
$1.0 million
and $
2.9 million
for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2013
, respectively. These costs are included in interest expense on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
9. Asset Retirement Obligations
The following table reflects the changes in the Company’s ARO during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
:
(In thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2013
$
36,458
Liabilities incurred during period
4,850
Liabilities settled during period
(1)
(2,062
)
Accretion expense during period
(2)
1,395
Revisions to estimates
863
Balance at September 30, 2014
$
41,504
___________________
(1)
Liabilities settled during period include ARO related to the properties sold in the Sanish Divestiture.
(2)
Included in depreciation, depletion and amortization on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
At
September 30, 2014
, the current portion of the total ARO balance was approximately
$0.5 million
and is included in accrued liabilities on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
10. Stock-Based Compensation
Restricted stock awards.
The Company has granted restricted stock awards to employees and directors under its Amended and Restated 2010 Long Term Incentive Plan, the majority of which vest over a
three
-year period. The fair value of restricted stock grants is based on the value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Compensation expense is recognized ratably over the requisite service period. For the
nine months ended September 30, 2014
, the Company assumed annual forfeiture rates by employee group ranging from
0%
to
12.7%
based on the Company’s forfeiture history for this type of award.
During the
nine months ended September 30, 2014
, employees and non-employee directors of the Company were granted restricted stock awards equal to
939,915
shares of common stock with a $
43.01
weighted average grant date per share value. Stock-based compensation expense recorded for restricted stock awards for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2014
was
$5.2 million
and
$13.4 million
, respectively, and was
$2.6 million
and
$7.1 million
for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2013
, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense is included in general and administrative expenses on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Performance share units.
The Company has granted performance share units (“PSUs”) to officers of the Company under its Amended and Restated 2010 Long Term Incentive Plan. The PSUs are awards of restricted stock units, and each PSU that is earned represents the right to receive
one
share of the Company’s common stock. For the
nine months ended September 30, 2014
, the Company assumed an annual forfeiture rate of
3.3%
based on the Company’s forfeiture history for the officer employee group receiving PSUs.
During the
nine months ended September 30, 2014
, officers of the Company were granted
158,970
PSUs with a $
41.71
weighted average grant date per share value. Stock-based compensation expense recorded for PSUs for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2014
was
$0.8 million
and
$2.3 million
, respectively, and is included in general and administrative expenses on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. Stock-based compensation expense recorded for PSUs for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2013
was
$0.5 million
and
$1.3 million
, respectively.
Each grant of PSUs is subject to a designated
three
-year initial performance period. The number of PSUs to be earned is subject to a market condition, which is based on a comparison of the total shareholder return (“TSR”) achieved with respect to shares of the Company’s common stock against the TSR achieved by a defined peer group at the end of the performance period.
13
Table of Contents
Depending on the Company’s TSR performance relative to the defined peer group, an award recipient will earn between
0%
and
200%
of the initial PSUs granted. If less than
200%
of the initial PSUs granted are earned at the end of the initial
three
-year performance period, then the performance period will be extended an additional year to give the recipient the opportunity to earn up to an aggregate of
200%
of the initial PSUs granted.
The Company accounted for these PSUs as equity awards pursuant to the FASB’s authoritative guidance for share-based payments. The aggregate grant date fair value of the market-based awards was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model, which results in an expected percentage of PSUs earned. The fair value of these PSUs is recognized on a straight-line basis over the performance period. As it is probable that a portion of the awards will be earned during the extended performance period, the grant date fair value will be amortized over
four years
. However, if
200%
of the initial PSUs granted are earned at the end of the initial performance period, then the remaining compensation expense will be accelerated in order to be fully recognized over
three years
. All compensation expense related to the PSUs will be recognized if the requisite performance period is fulfilled, even if the market condition is not achieved.
The Monte Carlo simulation model uses assumptions regarding random projections and must be repeated numerous times to achieve a probabilistic assessment. The key valuation assumptions for the Monte Carlo model are the forecast period, initial value, risk-free interest rate, volatility and correlation coefficients. The risk-free interest rate is the U.S. treasury bond rate on the date of grant that corresponds to the extended performance period. The initial value is the average of the volume weighted average prices for the
30
trading days prior to the start of the performance cycle for the Company and each of its peers. Volatility is the standard deviation of the average percentage change in stock price over a historical period for the Company and each of its peers. The correlation coefficients are measures of the strength of the linear relationship between and amongst the Company and its peers estimated based on historical stock price data.
The following assumptions were used for the Monte Carlo model to determine the grant date fair value and associated stock-based compensation expense of the PSUs granted during the
nine months ended September 30, 2014
:
Forecast period (years)
4.00
Risk-free interest rate
1.12
%
Oasis stock price volatility
44.49
%
Based on these assumptions, the Monte Carlo simulation model resulted in an expected percentage of PSUs earned of
98%
for the PSUs granted during the
nine months ended September 30, 2014
.
11. Income Taxes
The Company’s effective tax rate for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2014
was
38.6%
and
37.9%
, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rate for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2013
was
38.2%
and
37.2%
, respectively. These rates were consistent with the statutory tax rate applicable to the U.S. and the blended state rate for the states in which the Company conducts business. As of
September 30, 2014
, the Company did not have any uncertain tax positions requiring adjustments to its tax liability.
The Company had deferred tax assets for its federal and state tax loss carryforwards at
September 30, 2014
recorded in deferred income taxes. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. As of
September 30, 2014
, management determined that a valuation allowance was not required for the tax loss carryforwards as they are expected to be fully utilized before expiration.
12. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the periods presented. The calculation of diluted earnings per share includes the impact of potentially dilutive non-vested restricted shares outstanding during the periods presented, unless their effect is anti-dilutive. There are no adjustments made to income available to common stockholders in the calculation of diluted earnings per share.
14
Table of Contents
The following is a calculation of the basic and diluted weighted-average shares outstanding for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2014
and
2013
:
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2014
2013
2014
2013
(In thousands)
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
99,715
92,449
99,647
92,408
Dilution effect of stock awards at end of period
591
387
709
430
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
100,306
92,836
100,356
92,838
Anti-dilutive stock-based compensation awards
1,067
789
927
719
Issuance of common stock.
On December 9, 2013, the Company completed a public offering of
7,000,000
shares of its common stock, par value $
0.01
per share, at an offering price of $
44.94
per share. Net proceeds from the offering were $
314.4 million
, after deducting offering expenses, of which $
70,000
is included in common stock and $
314.3 million
is included in additional paid-in capital on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company used the net proceeds to repay outstanding indebtedness under its Second Amended Credit Facility, to fund its exploration, development and acquisition program and for general corporate purposes.
13. Business Segment Information
The Company’s exploration and production segment is engaged in the acquisition and development of oil and natural gas properties and includes the complementary marketing services provided by OPM. Revenues for the exploration and production segment are primarily derived from the sale of oil and natural gas production. In the first quarter of 2012, the Company began its well services business segment (OWS) to perform completion services for the Company’s oil and natural gas wells operated by OPNA. Revenues for the well services segment are derived from providing well completion services, well completion product sales and tool rentals. In the first quarter of 2013, the Company formed its midstream services business segment (OMS) to perform salt water disposal and other midstream services for the Company’s oil and natural gas wells operated by OPNA. Revenues for the midstream segment are primarily derived from salt water transport, salt water disposal and fresh water sales. The revenues and expenses related to work performed by OWS and OMS for OPNA’s working interests are eliminated in consolidation, and only the revenues and expenses related to non-affiliated working interest owners are included in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. These segments represent the Company’s
three
current operating units, each offering different products and services. The Company’s corporate activities have been allocated to the supported business segments accordingly.
Management evaluates the performance of the Company’s business segments based on operating income, which is defined as segment operating revenues less expenses. The following table summarizes financial information for the Company’s segments for the periods presented:
15
Table of Contents
Exploration and
Production
Well Services
Midstream Services
Eliminations
Consolidated
(In thousands)
Three months ended September 30, 2014:
Revenues from external customers
$
344,706
$
20,925
$
3,028
$
—
$
368,659
Inter-segment revenues
—
66,298
10,596
(76,894
)
—
Total revenues
344,706
87,223
13,624
(76,894
)
368,659
Operating income
126,184
23,388
5,126
(20,595
)
134,103
Other income (expense)
63,968
—
—
—
63,968
Income before income taxes
$
190,152
$
23,388
$
5,126
$
(20,595
)
$
198,071
Three months ended September 30, 2013:
Revenues from external customers
$
286,952
$
17,090
$
1,456
$
—
$
305,498
Inter-segment revenues
—
40,026
6,141
(46,167
)
—
Total revenues
286,952
57,116
7,597
(46,167
)
305,498
Operating income
140,765
19,094
4,394
(13,391
)
150,862
Other income (expense)
(62,628
)
(20
)
—
—
(62,648
)
Income before income taxes
$
78,137
$
19,074
$
4,394
$
(13,391
)
$
88,214
Nine months ended September 30, 2014:
Revenues from external customers
$
1,030,735
$
51,630
$
8,191
$
—
$
1,090,556
Inter-segment revenues
—
146,447
28,264
(174,711
)
—
Total revenues
1,030,735
198,077
36,455
(174,711
)
1,090,556
Operating income
602,797
53,137
15,854
(42,060
)
629,728
Other income (expense)
(98,140
)
75
—
—
(98,065
)
Income before income taxes
$
504,657
$
53,212
$
15,854
$
(42,060
)
$
531,663
Nine months ended September 30, 2013:
Revenues from external customers
$
770,445
$
34,266
$
3,673
$
—
$
808,384
Inter-segment revenues
—
90,000
15,778
(105,778
)
—
Total revenues
770,445
124,266
19,451
(105,778
)
808,384
Operating income
359,121
39,513
11,790
(28,159
)
382,265
Other income (expense)
(106,159
)
(11
)
—
—
(106,170
)
Income before income taxes
$
252,962
$
39,502
$
11,790
$
(28,159
)
$
276,095
Total assets:
As of September 30, 2014
$
5,344,775
$
212,131
$
157,209
$
(256,640
)
$
5,457,475
As of December 31, 2013
4,592,140
78,359
117,641
(76,216
)
4,711,924
14. Commitments and Contingencies
Included below is a discussion of various future commitments of the Company as of
September 30, 2014
. The commitments under these arrangements are not recorded in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. The amounts disclosed represent undiscounted cash flows, and no inflation elements have been applied.
Lease obligations.
The Company’s total rental commitments under leases for office space and other property and equipment at
September 30, 2014
were
$27.8 million
.
Drilling contracts.
As of
September 30, 2014
, the Company had certain drilling rig contracts with initial terms greater than one year. In the event of early termination under these contracts, the Company would be obligated to pay approximately
$33.1 million
as of
September 30, 2014
for the days remaining through the end of the primary terms of the contracts.
16
Table of Contents
Volume commitment agreements.
As of
September 30, 2014
, the Company had certain agreements with an aggregate requirement to deliver a minimum quantity of approximately
33.7
MMBbl and
9.1
Bcf from its Williston Basin project areas within specified timeframes, all of which are less than
ten years
. Future obligations under these agreements were approximately
$199.6 million
as of
September 30, 2014
.
Water purchase agreements
. As of
September 30, 2014
, the Company had certain agreements for the purchase of fresh water with an aggregate future obligation of approximately
$4.2 million
.
Cost sharing agreements.
As of
September 30, 2014
, the Company had certain agreements to share the cost to construct and install electrical facilities. The Company’s estimated future obligation under these agreements was
$9.6 million
as of
September 30, 2014
.
Investment commitment.
As of
September 30, 2014
, the Company had a remaining capital spending commitment of
$7.0 million
in connection with drilling and completion activities that the Company agreed to fund for certain wells that were part of the Company’s acquisitions of oil and natural gas properties in its East Nesson project area during the third quarter of 2013.
Litigation.
The Company is party to various legal and/or regulatory proceedings from time to time arising in the ordinary course of business. While the ultimate outcome and impact to the Company cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company believes that all such matters are without merit and involve amounts which, if resolved unfavorably, either individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. When the Company determines that a loss is probable of occurring and is reasonably estimable, the Company accrues an undiscounted liability for such contingencies based on its best estimate using information available at the time. The Company discloses contingencies where an adverse outcome may be material, or in the judgment of management, the matter should otherwise be disclosed.
On July 6, 2013, a freight train operated by Montreal, Maine and Atlantic Railway (“MMA”) carrying crude oil (the “Train”) derailed in Lac-Mégantic, Quebec. In March 2014, Oasis Petroleum Inc. and OP LLC were added to a group of over fifty named defendants, including other crude oil producers as well as the Canadian Pacific Railway, MMA and certain of its affiliates, owners and transloaders of the crude oil carried by the Train, several lessors of tank cars, and the Attorney General of Canada, in a motion filed in Quebec Superior Court to authorize a class-action lawsuit seeking economic, compensatory and punitive damages, as well as costs for claims arising out of the derailment of the Train (
Yannick Gagne, etc., et al. v. Rail World, Inc., etc., et al.
, Case No. 48006000001132). The motion generally alleges wrongful death and negligence in the failure to provide for the proper and safe transportation of crude oil.
The Company believes that all claims against Oasis Petroleum Inc. and OP LLC in connection with the derailment of the Train in Lac-Mégantic, Quebec are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against them.
17
Table of Contents
15. Condensed Consolidating Financial Information
The Notes (see Note 8) are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by the Guarantors, which are
100%
owned by the Company. These guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several among the Guarantors. Certain of the Company’s immaterial wholly-owned subsidiaries do not guarantee the Notes (“Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries”).
The following financial information reflects consolidating financial information of the parent company, Oasis Petroleum Inc. (“Issuer”), and its Guarantors on a combined basis, prepared on the equity basis of accounting. The Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries are immaterial and, therefore, not presented separately. The information is presented in accordance with the requirements of Rule 3-10 under the SEC’s Regulation S-X. The financial information may not necessarily be indicative of results of operations, cash flows or financial position had the Guarantors operated as independent entities. The Company has not presented separate financial and narrative information for each of the Guarantors because it believes such financial and narrative information would not provide any additional information that would be material in evaluating the sufficiency of the Guarantors.
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
September 30, 2014
Parent/
Issuer
Combined
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Intercompany
Eliminations
Consolidated
(In thousands, except share data)
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
777
$
66,417
$
—
$
67,194
Accounts receivable – oil and gas revenues
—
191,711
—
191,711
Accounts receivable – joint interest partners
—
197,929
—
197,929
Accounts receivable – affiliates
781
78,053
(78,834
)
—
Inventory
—
24,648
—
24,648
Prepaid expenses
445
13,808
—
14,253
Derivative instruments
—
33,874
—
33,874
Advances to joint interest partners
—
97
—
97
Other current assets
—
1,972
—
1,972
Total current assets
2,003
608,509
(78,834
)
531,678
Property, plant and equipment
Oil and gas properties (successful efforts method)
—
5,546,424
—
5,546,424
Other property and equipment
—
261,665
—
261,665
Less: accumulated depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment
—
(933,237
)
—
(933,237
)
Total property, plant and equipment, net
—
4,874,852
—
4,874,852
Investments in and advances to subsidiaries
3,826,612
—
(3,826,612
)
—
Derivative instruments
—
6,422
—
6,422
Deferred income taxes
133,526
—
(133,526
)
—
Deferred costs and other assets
30,582
13,941
—
44,523
Total assets
$
3,992,723
$
5,503,724
$
(4,038,972
)
$
5,457,475
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable
$
—
$
39,550
$
—
$
39,550
Accounts payable – affiliates
78,053
781
(78,834
)
—
Revenues and production taxes payable
—
248,272
—
248,272
Accrued liabilities
55
340,425
—
340,480
Accrued interest payable
24,528
374
—
24,902
Deferred income taxes
—
9,625
—
9,625
Advances from joint interest partners
—
6,776
—
6,776
Total current liabilities
102,636
645,803
(78,834
)
669,605
Long-term debt
2,200,000
350,000
—
2,550,000
Deferred income taxes
—
638,261
(133,526
)
504,735
Asset retirement obligations
—
41,052
—
41,052
Other liabilities
—
1,996
—
1,996
Total liabilities
2,302,636
1,677,112
(212,360
)
3,767,388
Stockholders’ equity
Capital contributions from affiliates
—
2,896,147
(2,896,147
)
—
Common stock, $0.01 par value: 300,000,000 shares authorized; 101,614,588 issued
1,000
—
—
1,000
Treasury stock, at cost: 283,249 shares
(10,602
)
—
—
(10,602
)
Additional paid-in capital
1,001,424
8,743
(8,743
)
1,001,424
Retained earnings
698,265
921,722
(921,722
)
698,265
Total stockholders’ equity
1,690,087
3,826,612
(3,826,612
)
1,690,087
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
3,992,723
$
5,503,724
$
(4,038,972
)
$
5,457,475
18
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
December 31, 2013
Parent/
Issuer
Combined
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Intercompany
Eliminations
Consolidated
(In thousands, except share data)
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
34,277
$
57,624
$
—
$
91,901
Accounts receivable – oil and gas revenues
—
175,653
—
175,653
Accounts receivable – joint interest partners
—
139,459
—
139,459
Accounts receivable – affiliates
770
9,100
(9,870
)
—
Inventory
—
20,652
—
20,652
Prepaid expenses
318
9,873
—
10,191
Deferred income taxes
—
6,335
—
6,335
Derivative instruments
—
2,264
—
2,264
Advances to joint interest partners
—
760
—
760
Other current assets
—
391
—
391
Total current assets
35,365
422,111
(9,870
)
447,606
Property, plant and equipment
Oil and gas properties (successful efforts method)
—
4,528,958
—
4,528,958
Other property and equipment
—
188,468
—
188,468
Less: accumulated depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment
—
(637,676
)
—
(637,676
)
Total property, plant and equipment, net
—
4,079,750
—
4,079,750
Assets held for sale
—
137,066
—
137,066
Investments in and advances to subsidiaries
3,450,668
—
(3,450,668
)
—
Derivative instruments
—
1,333
—
1,333
Deferred income taxes
85,288
—
(85,288
)
—
Deferred costs and other assets
33,983
12,186
—
46,169
Total assets
$
3,605,304
$
4,652,446
$
(3,545,826
)
$
4,711,924
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable
$
—
$
8,920
$
—
$
8,920
Accounts payable – affiliates
9,100
770
(9,870
)
—
Revenues and production taxes payable
—
146,741
—
146,741
Accrued liabilities
33
241,797
—
241,830
Accrued interest payable
47,622
288
—
47,910
Derivative instruments
—
8,188
—
8,188
Advances from joint interest partners
—
12,829
—
12,829
Total current liabilities
56,755
419,533
(9,870
)
466,418
Long-term debt
2,200,000
335,570
—
2,535,570
Deferred income taxes
—
408,435
(85,288
)
323,147
Asset retirement obligations
—
35,918
—
35,918
Derivative instruments
—
139
—
139
Other liabilities
—
2,183
—
2,183
Total liabilities
2,256,755
1,201,778
(95,158
)
3,363,375
Stockholders’ equity
Capital contributions from affiliates
—
2,930,978
(2,930,978
)
—
Common stock, $0.01 par value: 300,000,000 shares authorized; 100,866,589 issued
996
—
—
996
Treasury stock, at cost: 167,155 shares
(5,362
)
—
—
(5,362
)
Additional paid-in capital
985,023
8,743
(8,743
)
985,023
Retained earnings
367,892
510,947
(510,947
)
367,892
Total stockholders’ equity
1,348,549
3,450,668
(3,450,668
)
1,348,549
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
3,605,304
$
4,652,446
$
(3,545,826
)
$
4,711,924
19
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014
Parent/
Issuer
Combined
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Intercompany
Eliminations
Consolidated
(In thousands)
Revenues
Oil and gas revenues
$
—
$
344,706
$
—
$
344,706
Well services and midstream revenues
—
23,953
—
23,953
Total revenues
—
368,659
—
368,659
Expenses
Lease operating expenses
—
44,361
—
44,361
Well services and midstream operating expenses
—
14,922
—
14,922
Marketing, transportation and gathering expenses
—
7,306
—
7,306
Production taxes
—
34,584
—
34,584
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
—
106,972
—
106,972
Exploration expenses
—
1,100
—
1,100
Impairment of oil and gas properties
—
1,439
—
1,439
General and administrative expenses
6,373
17,542
—
23,915
Total expenses
6,373
228,226
—
234,599
Gain on sale of properties
—
43
—
43
Operating income (loss)
(6,373
)
140,476
—
134,103
Other income (expense)
Equity in earnings in subsidiaries
148,357
—
(148,357
)
—
Net gain on derivative instruments
—
103,426
—
103,426
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest
(36,724
)
(2,696
)
—
(39,420
)
Other income (expense)
—
(38
)
—
(38
)
Total other income (expense)
111,633
100,692
(148,357
)
63,968
Income before income taxes
105,260
241,168
(148,357
)
198,071
Income tax benefit (expense)
16,327
(92,811
)
—
(76,484
)
Net income
$
121,587
$
148,357
$
(148,357
)
$
121,587
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Three Months Ended September 30, 2013
Parent/
Issuer
Combined
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Intercompany
Eliminations
Consolidated
(In thousands)
Revenues
Oil and gas revenues
$
—
$
286,952
$
—
$
286,952
Well services and midstream revenues
—
18,546
—
18,546
Total revenues
—
305,498
—
305,498
Expenses
Lease operating expenses
—
21,831
—
21,831
Well services and midstream operating expenses
—
10,319
—
10,319
Marketing, transportation and gathering expenses
—
5,688
—
5,688
Production taxes
—
26,823
—
26,823
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
—
72,728
—
72,728
Exploration expenses
—
463
—
463
Impairment of oil and gas properties
—
56
—
56
General and administrative expenses
3,746
12,982
—
16,728
Total expenses
3,746
150,890
—
154,636
Operating income (loss)
(3,746
)
154,608
—
150,862
Other income (expense)
Equity in earnings in subsidiaries
70,118
—
(70,118
)
—
Net loss on derivative instruments
—
(39,817
)
—
(39,817
)
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest
(21,277
)
(1,577
)
—
(22,854
)
Other income (expense)
15
8
—
23
Total other income (expense)
48,856
(41,386
)
(70,118
)
(62,648
)
Income before income taxes
45,110
113,222
(70,118
)
88,214
Income tax benefit (expense)
9,389
(43,104
)
—
(33,715
)
Net income
$
54,499
$
70,118
$
(70,118
)
$
54,499
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
Parent/
Issuer
Combined
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Intercompany
Eliminations
Consolidated
(In thousands)
Revenues
Oil and gas revenues
$
—
$
1,030,735
$
—
$
1,030,735
Well services and midstream revenues
—
59,821
—
59,821
Total revenues
—
1,090,556
—
1,090,556
Expenses
Lease operating expenses
—
124,903
—
124,903
Well services and midstream operating expenses
—
34,611
—
34,611
Marketing, transportation and gathering expenses
—
19,606
—
19,606
Production taxes
—
100,880
—
100,880
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
—
295,520
—
295,520
Exploration expenses
—
1,955
—
1,955
Impairment of oil and gas properties
—
2,243
—
2,243
General and administrative expenses
17,790
50,396
—
68,186
Total expenses
17,790
630,114
—
647,904
Gain on sale of properties
—
187,076
—
187,076
Operating income (loss)
(17,790
)
647,518
—
629,728
Other income (expense)
Equity in earnings in subsidiaries
410,775
—
(410,775
)
—
Net gain on derivative instruments
—
20,253
—
20,253
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest
(110,853
)
(7,715
)
—
(118,568
)
Other income (expense)
3
247
—
250
Total other income (expense)
299,925
12,785
(410,775
)
(98,065
)
Income before income taxes
282,135
660,303
(410,775
)
531,663
Income tax benefit (expense)
48,238
(249,528
)
—
(201,290
)
Net income
$
330,373
$
410,775
$
(410,775
)
$
330,373
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
Parent/
Issuer
Combined
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Intercompany
Eliminations
Consolidated
(In thousands)
Revenues
Oil and gas revenues
$
—
$
770,445
$
—
$
770,445
Well services and midstream revenues
—
37,939
—
37,939
Total revenues
—
808,384
—
808,384
Expenses
Lease operating expenses
—
59,586
—
59,586
Well services and midstream operating expenses
—
19,877
—
19,877
Marketing, transportation and gathering expenses
—
19,856
—
19,856
Production taxes
—
70,309
—
70,309
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
—
205,779
—
205,779
Exploration expenses
—
2,712
—
2,712
Impairment of oil and gas properties
—
762
—
762
General and administrative expenses
10,146
37,092
—
47,238
Total expenses
10,146
415,973
—
426,119
Operating income (loss)
(10,146
)
392,411
—
382,265
Other income (expense)
Equity in earnings in subsidiaries
218,869
—
(218,869
)
—
Net loss on derivative instruments
—
(41,838
)
—
(41,838
)
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest
(61,955
)
(3,474
)
—
(65,429
)
Other income (expense)
(348
)
1,445
—
1,097
Total other income (expense)
156,566
(43,867
)
(218,869
)
(106,170
)
Income before income taxes
146,420
348,544
(218,869
)
276,095
Income tax benefit (expense)
27,049
(129,675
)
—
(102,626
)
Net income
$
173,469
$
218,869
$
(218,869
)
$
173,469
20
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
Parent/
Issuer
Combined
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Intercompany
Eliminations
Consolidated
(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income
$
330,373
$
410,775
$
(410,775
)
$
330,373
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries
(410,775
)
—
410,775
—
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
—
295,520
—
295,520
Gain on sale of properties
—
(187,076
)
(187,076
)
Impairment of oil and gas properties
—
2,243
—
2,243
Deferred income taxes
(48,238
)
245,786
—
197,548
Derivative instruments
—
(20,253
)
—
(20,253
)
Stock-based compensation expenses
15,398
357
—
15,755
Deferred financing costs amortization and other
3,400
1,809
—
5,209
Working capital and other changes:
Change in accounts receivable
(11
)
(131,523
)
68,953
(62,581
)
Change in inventory
—
(4,089
)
—
(4,089
)
Change in prepaid expenses
(127
)
(3,052
)
—
(3,179
)
Change in other current assets
—
(1,581
)
—
(1,581
)
Change in other assets
—
(3,069
)
—
(3,069
)
Change in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
45,881
131,860
(68,953
)
108,788
Change in other liabilities
—
(116
)
—
(116
)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
(64,099
)
737,591
—
673,492
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures
—
(972,763
)
—
(972,763
)
Acquisition of oil and gas properties
—
(26,126
)
—
(26,126
)
Proceeds from sale of properties
—
324,938
—
324,938
Costs related to sale of properties
—
(2,337
)
(2,337
)
Derivative settlements
—
(24,773
)
—
(24,773
)
Advances from joint interest partners
—
(6,053
)
—
(6,053
)
Net cash used in investing activities
—
(707,114
)
—
(707,114
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from revolving credit facility
—
370,000
—
370,000
Principal payments on revolving credit facility
—
(355,570
)
—
(355,570
)
Debt issuance costs
—
(99
)
—
(99
)
Purchases of treasury stock
(5,240
)
—
—
(5,240
)
Investment in / capital contributions from affiliates
36,015
(36,015
)
—
—
Other
(176
)
—
—
(176
)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
30,599
(21,684
)
—
8,915
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
(33,500
)
8,793
—
(24,707
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
34,277
57,624
—
91,901
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
777
$
66,417
$
—
$
67,194
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
Parent/
Issuer
Combined
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Intercompany
Eliminations
Consolidated
(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income
$
173,469
$
218,869
$
(218,869
)
$
173,469
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries
(218,869
)
—
218,869
—
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
—
205,779
—
205,779
Impairment of oil and gas properties
—
762
—
762
Deferred income taxes
(27,049
)
129,293
—
102,244
Derivative instruments
—
41,838
—
41,838
Stock-based compensation expenses
8,196
215
—
8,411
Deferred financing costs amortization and other
2,850
(157
)
—
2,693
Working capital and other changes:
Change in accounts receivable
(460
)
(69,614
)
2,587
(67,487
)
Change in inventory
—
(8,820
)
—
(8,820
)
Change in prepaid expenses
(164
)
(5,011
)
—
(5,175
)
Change in other current assets
233
(371
)
—
(138
)
Change in other assets
—
(63
)
—
(63
)
Change in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
(4,758
)
89,591
(2,587
)
82,246
Change in other liabilities
—
922
—
922
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
(66,552
)
603,233
—
536,681
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures
—
(654,175
)
—
(654,175
)
Acquisitions of oil and gas properties
—
(133,061
)
—
(133,061
)
Increase in restricted cash
(986,210
)
—
—
(986,210
)
Derivative settlements
—
(5,135
)
—
(5,135
)
Redemptions of short-term investments
25,000
—
—
25,000
Advances from joint interest partners
—
(7,965
)
—
(7,965
)
Net cash used in investing activities
(961,210
)
(800,336
)
—
(1,761,546
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes
1,000,000
—
—
1,000,000
Proceeds from revolving credit facility
—
160,000
—
160,000
Debt issuance costs
(15,340
)
(6,378
)
—
(21,718
)
Purchases of treasury stock
(1,424
)
—
—
(1,424
)
Investment in / capital contributions from affiliates
(56,316
)
56,316
—
—
Net cash provided by financing activities
926,920
209,938
—
1,136,858
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
(100,842
)
12,835
—
(88,007
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
133,797
79,650
—
213,447
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
32,955
$
92,485
$
—
$
125,440
16. Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated the period after the balance sheet date, noting no subsequent events or transactions that required recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, other than as noted below.
Lease obligations.
In October 2014, the Company entered into a lease agreement for temporary housing in Williston, North Dakota with a total rental commitment under the lease of
$6.6 million
.
21
Table of Contents
Item 2. — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2013
(“
2013
Annual Report”), as well as the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. All statements, other than statements of historical fact included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, regarding our strategy, future operations, financial position, estimated revenues and losses, projected costs, prospects, plans and objectives of management are forward-looking statements. When used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the words “could,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “expect,” “may,” “continue,” “predict,” “potential,” “project” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such identifying words. In particular, the factors discussed below and detailed under Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our
2013
Annual Report could affect our actual results and cause our actual results to differ materially from expectations, estimates, or assumptions expressed in, forecasted in, or implied in such forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements may include statements about:
•
our business strategy;
•
estimated future net reserves and present value thereof;
•
timing and amount of future production of oil and natural gas;
•
drilling and completion of wells;
•
estimated inventory of wells remaining to be drilled and completed;
•
costs of exploiting and developing our properties and conducting other operations;
•
availability of drilling, completion and production equipment and materials;
•
availability of qualified personnel;
•
owning and operating well services and midstream companies;
•
infrastructure for salt water disposal;
•
gathering, transportation and marketing of oil and natural gas, both in the Williston Basin and other regions in the United States;
•
property acquisitions;
•
integration and benefits of property acquisitions, including our recent acquisitions of oil and gas properties in our West Williston and East Nesson project areas, or the effects of such acquisitions on our cash position and levels of indebtedness;
•
the amount, nature and timing of capital expenditures;
•
availability and terms of capital;
•
our financial strategy, budget, projections, execution of business plan and operating results;
•
cash flows and liquidity;
•
oil and natural gas realized prices;
•
general economic conditions;
•
operating environment, including inclement weather conditions;
•
effectiveness of risk management activities;
•
competition in the oil and natural gas industry;
•
counterparty credit risk;
•
environmental liabilities;
•
governmental regulation and the taxation of the oil and natural gas industry;
•
developments in oil-producing and natural gas-producing countries;
•
technology;
•
uncertainty regarding future operating results; and
•
plans, objectives, expectations and intentions contained in this report that are not historical.
All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We disclaim any obligation to update or revise these statements unless required by securities law, and you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by the forward-looking statements we make in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are reasonable, we can give no assurance that
22
Table of Contents
these plans, intentions or expectations will be achieved. Some of the key factors which could cause actual results to vary from our expectations include changes in oil and natural gas prices, the timing of planned capital expenditures, availability of acquisitions, uncertainties in estimating proved reserves and forecasting production results, operational factors affecting the commencement or maintenance of producing wells, the condition of the capital markets generally, as well as our ability to access them, the proximity to and capacity of transportation facilities, and uncertainties regarding environmental regulations or litigation and other legal or regulatory developments affecting our business, as well as those factors discussed below and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, all of which are difficult to predict. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed may not occur. These cautionary statements qualify all forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf.
Overview
We are an independent exploration and production (“E&P”) company focused on the acquisition and development of unconventional oil and natural gas resources primarily in the North Dakota and Montana regions of the Williston Basin. Since our inception, we have acquired properties that provide current production and significant upside potential through further development. Our drilling activity is primarily directed toward projects that we believe can provide us with repeatable successes in the Bakken and Three Forks formations. Oasis Petroleum North America LLC (“OPNA”) conducts our domestic oil and natural gas E&P activities. We also operate an oil and gas marketing business, Oasis Petroleum Marketing LLC (“OPM”), a well services business, Oasis Well Services LLC (“OWS”), and a midstream services business, Oasis Midstream Services LLC (“OMS”), which are all complementary to our primary development and production activities. OWS and OMS are separate reportable business segments, while OPM is included in our E&P segment. The revenues and expenses related to work performed by OPM, OWS and OMS for OPNA’s working interests are eliminated in consolidation and, therefore, do not directly contribute to our consolidated results of operations.
Our use of capital for acquisitions and development allows us to direct our capital resources to what we believe to be the most attractive opportunities as market conditions evolve. We have historically acquired properties that we believe will meet or exceed our rate of return criteria. For acquisitions of properties with additional development, exploitation and exploration potential, we have focused on acquiring properties that we expect to operate so that we can control the timing and implementation of capital spending. In some instances, we have acquired non-operated property interests at what we believe to be attractive rates of return either because they provided an entry foothold in a new area of interest or complemented our existing operations. We intend to continue to acquire both operated and non-operated properties to the extent we believe they meet our return objectives. In addition, the acquisition of non-operated properties in new areas provides us with geophysical and geologic data that may lead to further acquisitions in the same area, whether on an operated or non-operated basis.
Due to the geographic concentration of our oil and natural gas properties in the Williston Basin, we believe the primary sources of opportunities, challenges and risks related to our business for both the short and long-term are:
•
commodity prices for oil and natural gas;
•
transportation capacity;
•
availability and cost of services; and
•
availability of qualified personnel.
Our revenue, profitability and future growth rate depend substantially on factors beyond our control, such as economic, political and regulatory developments as well as competition from other sources of energy. Oil and natural gas prices historically have been volatile and may fluctuate widely in the future. Sustained periods of low prices for oil or natural gas could materially and adversely affect our financial position, our results of operations, the quantities of oil and natural gas reserves that we can economically produce and our access to capital.
Prices for oil and natural gas can fluctuate widely in response to relatively minor changes in the global and regional supply of and demand for oil and natural gas, as well as market uncertainty, economic conditions and a variety of additional factors. Since the inception of our oil and natural gas activities, commodity prices have experienced significant fluctuations. We enter into crude oil sales contracts with purchasers who have access to crude oil transportation capacity, utilize derivative financial instruments to manage our commodity price risk, and enter into physical delivery contracts to manage our price differentials. In an effort to improve price realizations from the sale of our oil and natural gas, we manage our commodities marketing activities in-house, which enables us to market and sell our oil and natural gas to a broader array of potential purchasers. Due to the availability of other markets and pipeline connections, we do not believe that the loss of any single oil or natural gas customer would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or cash flows. Additionally, we sell a significant amount of our crude oil production through gathering systems connected to multiple pipeline and rail facilities. These gathering systems, which originate at the wellhead, reduce the need to transport barrels by truck from the wellhead. As of
September 30, 2014
, we were flowing 77% of our gross operated oil production through these gathering systems.
23
Table of Contents
Changes in commodity prices may also significantly affect the economic viability of drilling projects and economic recovery of oil and gas reserves. As a result of higher commodity prices and continued successes in the application of completion technologies in the Bakken and Three Forks formations, there were approximately 208 active drilling rigs in the Williston Basin at
September 30, 2014
. Although additional Williston Basin transportation takeaway capacity was added in recent years, production also increased due to the elevated drilling activity. The increased production coupled with delays in rail car arrivals and commissioning of rail loading facilities caused price differentials at times to be at the high-end of the historical average range of approximately 10% to 15% of the price quoted for NYMEX West Texas Intermediate (“WTI”) crude oil in the first half of 2012. In the third quarter of 2012, our average price differentials relative to WTI began to narrow, primarily due to transportation capacity additions, including expanded rail infrastructure and pipeline expansions, outpacing production growth. In the fourth quarter of 2012 and into the first quarter of 2013, average price differentials continued to narrow, primarily due to our ability to access premium coastal markets by rail. As the premium received in coastal markets contracted during the second and third quarters of 2013, our average price differentials relative to WTI increased. In the fourth quarter of 2013 and into the first quarter of 2014, our average price differentials relative to WTI continued to increase due to the pipeline market weakening as a result of refinery down time and increased United States and Canadian production. More recently, stronger pipeline prices have shifted more of our barrels towards the pipelines, but rail buyers have had to compete with pipeline prices despite weaker Brent differentials, and our price differentials to WTI have returned to approximately 9% to 11%. Our market optionality on the crude oil gathering systems allows us to shift volumes between pipeline and rail markets in order to optimize price realizations.
Third Quarter
2014
Highlights:
•
We completed and placed on production 66 gross (52.4 net) operated wells in the Williston Basin during the three months ended
September 30, 2014
;
•
We had 16 rigs running during the third quarter of 2014, and as of
September 30, 2014
, we had an inventory of gross operated wells waiting on completion of 49 wells in our West Williston project area and 12 wells in our East Nesson project area;
•
Average daily production was
45,873
Boe per day during the three months ended
September 30, 2014
;
•
Capital expenditures were $437.6 million during the three months ended
September 30, 2014
;
•
At
September 30, 2014
, we had
$67.2 million
of cash and cash equivalents and had total liquidity of
$1,212.0 million
, including the availability under our revolving credit facility; and
•
Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, was
$238.8 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
. For a definition of Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income and net cash provided by operating activities, see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below.
Results of Operations
Revenues
Our oil and gas revenues are derived from the sale of oil and natural gas production. These revenues do not include the effects of derivative instruments and may vary significantly from period to period as a result of changes in volumes of production sold or changes in commodity prices. Our well services and midstream revenues are primarily derived from well completion activity, well completion product sales, tool rentals, salt water transport, salt water disposal and fresh water sales for third-party working interest owners in OPNA’s operated wells. Intercompany revenues for work performed by OWS and OMS for OPNA’s working interests are eliminated in consolidation.
24
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes our revenues and production data for the periods presented:
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2014
2013
Change
2014
2013
Change
Operating results (in thousands):
Revenues
Oil
$
328,548
$
273,663
$
54,885
$
972,338
$
737,963
$
234,375
Natural gas
16,158
13,289
2,869
58,397
32,482
25,915
Well services and midstream
23,953
18,546
5,407
59,821
37,939
21,882
Total revenues
368,659
305,498
63,161
1,090,556
808,384
282,172
Production data:
Oil (MBbls)
3,769
2,716
1,053
10,759
7,687
3,072
Natural gas (MMcf)
2,707
1,954
753
7,752
4,883
2,869
Oil equivalents (MBoe)
4,220
3,042
1,178
12,051
8,501
3,550
Average daily production (Boe/d)
45,873
33,064
12,809
44,143
31,140
13,003
Average sales prices:
Oil, without derivative settlements (per Bbl)
(1)
$
87.17
$
100.75
$
(13.58
)
$
90.37
$
95.24
$
(4.87
)
Oil, with derivative settlements (per Bbl)
(1)(2)
84.22
97.78
(13.56
)
88.07
94.58
(6.51
)
Natural gas (per Mcf)
(3)
5.97
6.80
(0.83
)
7.53
6.65
0.88
____________________
(1)
For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, average sales prices for oil are calculated using total oil revenues, excluding bulk oil sales of $5.8 million, divided by oil production.
(2)
Realized prices include gains or losses on cash settlements for commodity derivatives, which do not qualify for and were not designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes.
(3)
Natural gas prices include the value for natural gas and natural gas liquids.
Three months ended September 30, 2014
as compared to
three months ended September 30, 2013
Our total revenues
increased
$63.2 million
, or
21%
, to
$368.7 million
during the three months ended
September 30, 2014
as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2013
, primarily due to increased production volumes sold, partially offset by lower realized oil and natural gas sales prices.
Oil and gas revenues
. Our primary revenues are a function of oil and natural gas production volumes sold and average sales prices received for those volumes. Average daily production sold
increased
by
12,809
Boe per day, or
39%
, to
45,873
Boe per day during the three months ended
September 30, 2014
as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2013
. The increase in average daily production sold was primarily a result of our 153.6 total net well completions in the Williston Basin during the twelve months ended
September 30, 2014
and our four distinct acquisitions during 2013 of oil and natural gas properties including existing producing wells in and around our West Williston and East Nesson project areas (the “2013 Acquisitions”), offset by the decline in production in wells that were producing as of
September 30, 2013
and the sale of certain non-operated properties in our Sanish project area and other non-operated leases adjacent to our Sanish position (the “Sanish Divestiture”) during the first quarter of 2014. Average daily production in our West Williston and East Nesson project areas increased by 12,170 Boe per day and 3,401 Boe per day, respectively, during the
third
quarter of
2014
as compared to the
third
quarter of
2013
. The
third
quarter of
2013
also included average daily production of 2,762 Boe per day from our Sanish project area, which was sold in the Sanish Divestiture in the first quarter of 2014. Average oil sales prices, without derivative settlements,
decreased
by
$13.58
/Bbl to an average of
$87.17
/Bbl, and average natural gas sales prices, which include the value for natural gas and natural gas liquids,
decreased
by
$0.83
/Mcf to an average of
$5.97
/Mcf for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2013
. The higher production amounts sold increased revenues by $96.3 million, partially offset by lower oil and natural gas sales prices, which decreased revenues by $38.5 million during the three months ended
September 30, 2014
as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2013
.
Well services and midstream revenues.
Well services revenues
increased
$3.8 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2013
due to an increase in well completion activity, well completion product sales and tool rentals. Midstream revenues were
$3.0 million
, a
$1.6 million
increase quarter over quarter, primarily due to increased water volumes flowing through our salt water disposal systems and fresh water sales.
Nine months ended September 30, 2014
as compared to
nine months ended September 30, 2013
25
Table of Contents
Our total revenues
increased
$282.2 million
, or
35%
, to
$1,090.6 million
during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
as compared to the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
, primarily due to increased production volumes sold, partially offset by lower realized oil sales prices.
Oil and gas revenues
. Our primary revenues are a function of oil and natural gas production volumes sold and average sales prices received for those volumes. Average daily production sold
increased
by
13,003
Boe per day, or
42%
, to
44,143
Boe per day during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
as compared to the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
. The increase in average daily production sold was primarily a result of our 153.6 total net well completions in the Williston Basin during the twelve months ended
September 30, 2014
coupled with the 2013 Acquisitions, offset by the decline in production in wells that were producing as of
September 30, 2013
and the Sanish Divestiture. Average daily production in our West Williston and East Nesson project areas increased by 11,177 Boe per day and 4,530 Boe per day, respectively, during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
as compared to the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
. Average daily production in our Sanish project area decreased 2,704 Boe per day during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
as compared to the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
as a result of the Sanish Divestiture during the first quarter of 2014. Average oil sales prices, without derivative settlements,
decreased
by
$4.87
/Bbl to an average of
$90.37
/Bbl, and average natural gas sales prices, which include the value for natural gas and natural gas liquids,
increased
by
$0.88
/Mcf to an average of
$7.53
/Mcf for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
as compared to the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
. The higher production amounts sold increased revenues by $299.2 million, and higher natural gas sales prices increased revenues by $4.3 million, partially offset by lower oil sales prices decreasing revenues by $37.5 million during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
as compared to the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
. In addition, there was a $5.8 million decrease in bulk oil sales related to marketing activities included in oil revenues during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
as compared to the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
.
Well services and midstream revenues.
Well services revenues
increased
$17.4 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
as compared to the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
due to an increase in well completion activity, well completion product sales and tool rentals. Midstream revenues were
$8.2 million
, a
$4.5 million
increase period over period, primarily due to increased water volumes flowing through our salt water disposal systems and fresh water sales.
26
Table of Contents
Expenses and gain on sale of properties
The following table summarizes our operating and other expenses and our gain on sale of properties for the periods presented:
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2014
2013
Change
2014
2013
Change
(In thousands, except per Boe of production)
Expenses:
Lease operating expenses
$
44,361
$
21,831
$
22,530
$
124,903
$
59,586
$
65,317
Well services and midstream operating expenses
14,922
10,319
4,603
34,611
19,877
14,734
Marketing, transportation and gathering expenses
7,306
5,688
1,618
19,606
19,856
(250
)
Production taxes
34,584
26,823
7,761
100,880
70,309
30,571
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
106,972
72,728
34,244
295,520
205,779
89,741
Exploration expenses
1,100
463
637
1,955
2,712
(757
)
Impairment of oil and gas properties
1,439
56
1,383
2,243
762
1,481
General and administrative expenses
23,915
16,728
7,187
68,186
47,238
20,948
Total expenses
234,599
154,636
79,963
647,904
426,119
221,785
Gain on sale of properties
43
—
43
187,076
—
187,076
Operating income
134,103
150,862
(16,759
)
629,728
382,265
247,463
Other income (expense):
Net gain (loss) on derivative instruments
103,426
(39,817
)
143,243
20,253
(41,838
)
62,091
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest
(39,420
)
(22,854
)
(16,566
)
(118,568
)
(65,429
)
(53,139
)
Other income (expense)
(38
)
23
(61
)
250
1,097
(847
)
Total other income (expense)
63,968
(62,648
)
126,616
(98,065
)
(106,170
)
8,105
Income before income taxes
198,071
88,214
109,857
531,663
276,095
255,568
Income tax expense
76,484
33,715
42,769
201,290
102,626
98,664
Net income
$
121,587
$
54,499
$
67,088
$
330,373
$
173,469
$
156,904
Cost and expense (per Boe of production):
Lease operating expenses
$
10.51
$
7.18
$
3.33
$
10.36
$
7.01
$
3.35
Marketing, transportation and gathering expenses
1.73
1.87
(0.14
)
1.63
2.34
(0.71
)
Production taxes
8.19
8.82
(0.63
)
8.37
8.27
0.10
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
25.35
23.91
1.44
24.52
24.21
0.31
General and administrative expenses
5.67
5.50
0.17
5.66
5.56
0.10
Three months ended
September 30, 2014
as compared to three months ended
September 30, 2013
Lease operating expenses
. Lease operating expenses
increased
$22.5 million
to
$44.4 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2013
. This increase was primarily due to the costs associated with operating an increased number of producing wells and associated produced fluid volumes as a result of our well completions and the 2013 Acquisitions, as well as increased workover costs. We completed and placed on production 52.9 total net wells in the Williston Basin during the three months ended
September 30, 2014
as compared to 29.7 total net wells completed and placed on production during the three months ended
September 30, 2013
. Lease operating expenses
increased
from
$7.18
per Boe for the three months ended
September 30, 2013
to
$10.51
per Boe for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
.
Well services and midstream operating expenses
. Well services and midstream operating expenses represent third-party working interest owners’ share of completion service costs and cost of goods sold incurred by OWS and OMS operating expenses. The
$4.6 million
increase
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2013
was attributable to a $3.6 million increase from OWS’ well completion activity and well completion product sales, and a $1.0 million increase related to midstream services operating expenses.
Marketing, transportation and gathering expenses
. The
$1.6 million
increase
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2013
was primarily attributable to increased oil transportation costs associated with having additional wells connected to third-party infrastructure. In addition, there was a $0.3 million decrease due to the change in the non-cash valuation adjustments on our oil pipeline imbalances. Excluding non-cash valuation
27
Table of Contents
adjustments, our marketing, transportation and gathering expenses on a per Boe basis would have been $1.67 and $1.70 for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
, respectively. The transporting of volumes through third-party oil gathering pipelines increases marketing, transportation and gathering expenses but improves oil price realizations by reducing transportation costs included in our oil price differential for sales at the wellhead.
Production taxes
. Our production taxes for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
were
10.0%
and
9.4%
, respectively, as a percentage of oil and natural gas sales. The
third
quarter
2014
production tax rate was higher than the
third
quarter
2013
production tax rate primarily due to the increased weighting of wells in North Dakota compared to Montana, which has lower production tax rates. For the three months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
, the percentage of our total production located in North Dakota was 87% and 82%, respectively, with an average production tax rate of approximately 11%.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization (“DD&A”).
DD&A expense
increased
$34.2 million
to
$107.0 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2013
. This increase in DD&A expense for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
was a result of the production increases from our wells completed during the twelve months ended
September 30, 2014
and the 2013 Acquisitions. The DD&A rate for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
was
$25.35
per Boe compared to
$23.91
per Boe for the three months ended
September 30, 2013
. The increase in the DD&A rate was primarily due to the 2013 Acquisitions coupled with an increase in the drilling program into the Three Forks formation, offset by continued reductions to well costs.
Impairment of oil and gas properties
. During the three months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
, we recorded non-cash impairment charges of
$1.4 million
and
$0.1 million
, respectively, for expiring leases. No impairment charges of proved oil and gas properties were recorded for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
or
2013
.
General and administrative (“G&A”) expenses
. Our G&A expenses
increased
$7.2 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
from
$16.7 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2013
. Of this increase, approximately $5.4 million related to increased employee compensation expense due to our organizational growth and $3.0 million was due to increased amortization of our restricted stock awards and performance share units quarter over quarter. As of
September 30, 2014
, we had 528 full-time employees compared to 356 full-time employees as of
September 30, 2013
. There were offsetting decreases to G&A related to OWS and OMS of $1.1 million and $0.5 million, respectively, quarter over quarter.
Gain on sale of properties.
During the three months ended
September 30, 2014
, we recognized a gain on sale of properties of
$43,000
for post close adjustments related to the Sanish Divestiture. No gain or loss on sale of properties was recorded for the three months ended
September 30, 2013
.
Derivative instruments
. As a result of our derivative activities, we incurred cash settlement net
loss
es of
$11.1 million
and
$8.1 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
, respectively. In addition, as a result of forward oil price changes, we recognized a
$114.6 million
non-cash mark-to-market net derivative
gain
during the three months ended
September 30, 2014
and a
$31.8 million
non-cash mark-to-market net derivative
loss
during the three months ended
September 30, 2013
.
Interest expense
. Interest expense
increased
$16.6 million
to
$39.4 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2013
. The increase was primarily the result of interest expense incurred on our senior unsecured notes issued in September 2013 at an interest rate of 6.875% coupled with interest expense incurred on borrowings under our revolving credit facility during the three months ended
September 30, 2014
. For the three months ended
September 30, 2014
, the weighted average debt outstanding under our revolving credit facility was $249.6 million and the weighted average interest rate incurred on the outstanding borrowings was 1.7%. For the three months ended
September 30, 2013
, the weighted average debt outstanding under our revolving credit facility was $33.3 million and the weighted average interest rate incurred on the outstanding borrowings was 2.8%. Interest capitalized during the three months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
was $2.3 million and $1.4 million, respectively.
Income taxes.
Income tax expense for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
was recorded at
38.6%
and
38.2%
of pre-tax net income, respectively. Our effective tax rate is expected to continue to closely approximate the statutory rate applicable to the U.S. and the blended state rate of the states in which we conduct business.
Nine months ended
September 30, 2014
as compared to
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
Lease operating expenses
. Lease operating expenses
increased
$65.3 million
to
$124.9 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
as compared to the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
. This increase was primarily due to the costs associated with operating an increased number of producing wells and associated produced fluid volumes as a result of our well completions and the 2013 Acquisitions, as well as increased workover costs, which relate to restoring wells that were down due to winter weather conditions and include certain costs to protect producing wells from wells that are being completed. We
28
Table of Contents
completed and placed on production 115.3 total net wells in the Williston Basin during the nine months ended
September 30, 2014
as compared to 75.9 total net wells completed and placed on production during the nine months ended
September 30, 2013
. Lease operating expenses
increased
from
$7.01
per Boe for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
to
$10.36
per Boe for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
.
Well services and midstream operating expenses
. Well services and midstream operating expenses represent third-party working interest owners’ share of completion service costs and cost of goods sold incurred by OWS and OMS operating expenses. The
$14.7 million
increase
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
as compared to the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
was attributable to a $12.1 million increase from OWS’ well completion activity and well completion product sales, and a $2.6 million increase related to midstream services operating expenses.
Marketing, transportation and gathering expenses
. The
$0.3 million
decrease
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
as compared to the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
was primarily attributable to a $5.8 million decrease for bulk oil purchases made by OPM in the first quarter of 2013 and a $1.0 million decrease due to the change in the non-cash valuation adjustments on our oil pipeline imbalances, partially offset by a $6.6 million increase in oil transportation costs associated with having additional wells connected to third-party infrastructure. Excluding bulk oil purchases and non-cash valuation adjustments, our marketing, transportation and gathering expenses on a per Boe basis would have been $1.66 and $1.59 for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
, respectively. The transporting of volumes through third-party oil gathering pipelines increases marketing, transportation and gathering expenses but improves oil price realizations by reducing transportation costs included in our oil price differential for sales at the wellhead.
Production taxes
. Our production taxes for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
were
9.8%
and
9.2%
, respectively, as a percentage of oil and natural gas sales. The
2014
production tax rate was higher than the
2013
production tax rate primarily due to the increased weighting of wells in North Dakota compared to Montana, which has lower production tax rates. For the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
, the percentage of our total production located in North Dakota was 86% and 80%, respectively, with an average production tax rate of approximately 11%.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization (“DD&A”).
DD&A expense
increased
$89.7 million
to
$295.5 million
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2014
as compared to the
nine months ended September 30, 2013
. This increase in DD&A expense for the
nine months ended September 30, 2014
was a result of the production increases from our wells completed during the twelve months ended
September 30, 2014
and the 2013 Acquisitions. The DD&A rate for the
nine months ended September 30, 2014
was
$24.52
per Boe as compared to
$24.21
per Boe for the
nine months ended September 30, 2013
. In the first two months of 2014, we had production from the wells sold in the Sanish Divestiture, but these wells were not depreciated because the assets were held for sale, which lowered DD&A by $0.25 per Boe for the
nine months ended September 30, 2014
. The increase in the DD&A rate was primarily due to the 2013 Acquisitions coupled with an increase in the drilling program into the Three Forks formation, offset by continued reductions to well costs.
Impairment of oil and gas properties
. During the
nine months ended September 30, 2014
and
2013
, we recorded non-cash impairment charges of
$2.2 million
and
$0.8 million
, respectively, for expiring leases. No impairment charges of proved oil and gas properties were recorded for the
nine months ended September 30, 2014
or
2013
.
General and administrative (“G&A”) expenses
. Our G&A expenses
increased
$20.9 million
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2014
from
$47.2 million
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2013
. Of this increase, approximately $15.5 million related to increased employee compensation expense due to our organizational growth and $7.3 million was due to increased amortization of our restricted stock awards and performance share units. As of
September 30, 2014
, we had 528 full-time employees compared to 356 full-time employees as of
September 30, 2013
. There were offsetting decreases to G&A related to OWS and OMS of $2.3 million and $1.5 million, respectively, for the
nine months ended September 30, 2014
as compared to the
nine months ended September 30, 2013
.
Gain on sale of properties.
We recognized a gain on sale of properties of
$187.1 million
related to the Sanish Divestiture in the
nine months ended September 30, 2014
. No gain or loss on sale of properties was recorded in the
nine months ended September 30, 2013
.
Derivative instruments
. As a result of our derivative activities, we incurred cash settlement net
loss
es of
$24.8 million
and
$5.1 million
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2014
and
2013
, respectively. In addition, as a result of forward oil price changes, we recognized a
$45.0 million
non-cash mark-to-market net derivative
gain
during the
nine months ended September 30, 2014
and a
$36.7 million
non-cash mark-to-market net derivative loss during the
nine months ended September 30, 2013
.
Interest expense
. Interest expense
increased
$53.1 million
to
$118.6 million
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2014
as compared to the
nine months ended September 30, 2013
. The increase was primarily the result of interest expense incurred on our senior unsecured notes issued in September 2013 at an interest rate of 6.875% coupled with interest expense
29
Table of Contents
incurred on borrowings under our revolving credit facility during the
nine months ended September 30, 2014
. For the
nine months ended September 30, 2014
, the weighted average debt outstanding under our revolving credit facility was $209.0 million and the weighted average interest rate incurred on the outstanding borrowings was 1.7%. For the
nine months ended September 30, 2013
, the weighted average debt outstanding under our revolving credit facility was $11.2 million and the weighted average interest rate incurred on the outstanding borrowings was 2.8%. Interest capitalized during the
nine months ended September 30, 2014
and
2013
was $6.1 million and $3.2 million, respectively.
Income taxes.
Income tax expense for the
nine months ended September 30, 2014
and
2013
was recorded at
37.9%
and
37.2%
of pre-tax net income, respectively. Our effective tax rate is expected to continue to closely approximate the statutory rate applicable to the U.S. and the blended state rate of the states in which we conduct business.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity as of the date of this report are proceeds from our senior unsecured notes, borrowings and availability under our revolving credit facility, proceeds from public equity offerings and cash flows from operations. Our primary use of capital has been for the development and acquisition of oil and natural gas properties. We continually monitor potential capital sources, including equity and debt financings, in order to meet our planned capital expenditures and liquidity requirements. Our future success in growing proved reserves and production will be highly dependent on our ability to access outside sources of capital.
Our cash flows for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
are presented below:
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2014
2013
(In thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
673,492
$
536,681
Net cash used in investing activities
(707,114
)
(1,761,546
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
8,915
1,136,858
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
$
(24,707
)
$
(88,007
)
Our cash flows depend on many factors, including the price of oil and natural gas and the success of our development and exploration activities as well as future acquisitions. We actively manage our exposure to commodity price fluctuations by executing derivative transactions to mitigate the change in oil prices on a portion of our production, thereby mitigating our exposure to oil price declines, but these transactions may also limit our cash flow in periods of rising oil prices. For additional information on the impact of changing prices on our financial position, see Item 3. “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.”
Cash flows provided by operating activities
Net cash
provided
by operating activities was
$673.5 million
and
$536.7 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
, respectively. The increase in cash flows
provided
by operating activities for the period ended
September 30, 2014
as compared to
2013
was primarily the result of our 42% increase in oil and natural gas production, coupled with increases in well completion activity, well completion product sales, tool rentals, salt water transport, salt water disposal and fresh water sales for non-affiliated working interest owners in OPNA’s operated wells.
Working capital.
Our working capital fluctuates primarily as a result of changes in commodity pricing and production volumes, capital spending to fund our exploratory and development initiatives and acquisitions, and the impact of our outstanding derivative instruments. We had a working capital deficit of
$137.9 million
at
September 30, 2014
. We believe we have adequate liquidity to meet our working capital requirements. As of
September 30, 2014
, we had
$1,212.0 million
of liquidity available, including
$67.2 million
in cash and cash equivalents and
$1,144.8 million
of unused borrowing base committed capacity available under our revolving credit facility. At
September 30, 2013
, we had a working capital surplus of $999.1 million, primarily attributable to the proceeds from our senior unsecured notes issued in September 2013 at an interest rate of 6.875%.
Cash flows used in investing activities
Net cash
used
in investing activities was
$707.1 million
and
$1,761.5 million
during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
, respectively. Net cash
used
in investing activities during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
was primarily attributable to
$972.8 million
in capital expenditures primarily for drilling and development costs, partially offset by proceeds of
$324.9 million
related to the Sanish Divestiture. Net cash used in investing activities during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
was primarily attributable to $986.2 million for restricted cash held in escrow pending the
30
Table of Contents
closing of the acquisition of oil and gas properties in our West Williston project area, capital expenditures primarily for drilling and development costs of $654.2 million, and $133.1 million for the acquisition of oil and gas properties.
Our capital expenditures are summarized in the following table:
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2014
(In thousands)
Project Area:
West Williston
$
657,747
East Nesson
385,857
Total E&P capital expenditures
(1)
1,043,604
OWS
34,383
Non-E&P capital expenditures
(2)
18,914
Total capital expenditures
(3)
$
1,096,901
___________________
(1)
Total E&P capital expenditures include $27.8 million for OMS, primarily related to pipelines and salt water disposal wells.
(2)
Non-E&P capital expenditures include such items as administrative capital and capitalized interest.
(3)
Capital expenditures reflected in the table above differ from the amounts shown in the statement of cash flows in our condensed consolidated financial statements because amounts reflected in the table above include changes in accrued liabilities from the previous reporting period for capital expenditures, while the amounts presented in the statement of cash flows are presented on a cash basis.
Our total
2014
capital expenditure budget is $1,425 million, which consists of:
•
$1,250 million of drilling and completion (including production-related equipment) capital expenditures for operated and non-operated wells (including expected savings from services provided by OWS and OMS);
•
$60 million for constructing infrastructure to support production in our core project areas, primarily related to salt water disposal systems;
•
$25 million for maintaining and expanding our leasehold position;
•
$19 million for field facilities and other miscellaneous E&P capital expenditures;
•
$13 million for collection of subsurface reservoir data;
•
$35 million for OWS, including district tools; and
•
$23 million for other non-E&P capital, including items such as administrative capital and capitalized interest.
While we have budgeted $1,425 million for these purposes, the ultimate amount of capital we will expend may fluctuate materially based on market conditions and the success of our drilling and operations results as the year progresses. Additionally, if we acquire additional acreage, as was the case in 2013, our capital expenditures may be higher than budgeted. We believe that cash on hand, cash flows from operating activities and availability under our revolving credit facility should be sufficient to fund our
2014
capital expenditure budget. However, because the operated wells funded by our
2014
drilling plan represent only a small percentage of our gross potential drilling locations, we will be required to generate or raise multiples of this amount of capital to develop our entire inventory of potential drilling locations should we elect to do so.
Our capital budget may be adjusted as business conditions warrant. The amount, timing and allocation of capital expenditures is largely discretionary and within our control. If oil and natural gas prices decline or costs increase significantly, we could defer a significant portion of our budgeted capital expenditures until later periods to prioritize capital projects that we believe have the highest expected returns and potential to generate near-term cash flows. We routinely monitor and adjust our capital expenditures in response to changes in prices, availability of financing, drilling and acquisition costs, industry conditions, the timing of regulatory approvals, the availability of rigs, success or lack of success in drilling activities, contractual obligations, internally generated cash flows and other factors both within and outside our control. We actively review acquisition opportunities on an ongoing basis. Our ability to make significant acquisitions for cash would require us to obtain additional equity or debt financing, which we may not be able to obtain on terms acceptable to us or at all.
Cash flows provided by financing activities
Net cash
provided
in financing activities was
$8.9 million
and
$1,136.9 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
and 2013, respectively. For the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
, cash provided by financing activities was primarily due to proceeds from borrowings under our revolving credit facility partially offset by principal payments on our
31
Table of Contents
revolving credit facility. For the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
, cash provided by financing activities was primarily due to proceeds from the issuance of our senior unsecured notes in September 2013 and borrowings under our revolving credit facility. For both the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
, cash provided by financing activities was also attributable to the purchases of treasury stock for shares withheld by us equivalent to the payroll tax withholding obligations due from employees upon the vesting of restricted stock awards.
Senior unsecured notes.
On September 24, 2013, we issued $1,000.0 million of 6.875% senior unsecured notes due March 15, 2022 (the “2022 Notes”). Interest is payable on the 2022 Notes semi-annually in arrears on each March 15 and September 15, commencing March 15, 2014. The 2022 Notes are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by our material subsidiaries. The issuance of these 2022 Notes resulted in net proceeds to us of approximately $983.6 million, which we used to fund a portion of the 2013 Acquisitions.
At any time prior to September 15, 2016, we may redeem up to 35% of the 2022 Notes at a redemption price of 106.875% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date, with the proceeds of certain equity offerings as long as the redemption occurs within 180 days of completing such equity offering and at least 65% of the aggregate principal amount of the 2022 Notes remains outstanding after such redemption. Prior to September 15, 2017, we may redeem some or all of the 2022 Notes for cash at a redemption price equal to 100% of their principal amount plus an applicable make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. On and after September 15, 2017, we may redeem some or all of the 2022 Notes at redemption prices (expressed as percentages of the principal amount) equal to 103.438% for the twelve-month period beginning on September 15, 2017, 101.719% for the twelve-month period beginning on September 15, 2018 and 100.00% beginning on September 15, 2019, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date.
On June 30, 2014, we filed a registration statement on Form S-4 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to allow the holders of the 2022 Notes to exchange the 2022 Notes for the same principal amount of a new issue of notes with substantially identical terms, except the new notes are freely transferable under the Securities Act of 1933. The registration statement was declared effective on July 16, 2014, and we closed the exchange offer on August 15, 2014.
On July 2, 2012, we issued $400.0 million of 6.875% senior unsecured notes due January 15, 2023 (the “2023 Notes”). Interest is payable on the 2023 Notes semi-annually in arrears on each January 15 and July 15, commencing January 15, 2013. The 2023 Notes are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by our material subsidiaries. The issuance of these 2023 Notes resulted in net proceeds to us of approximately $392.4 million, which we used to fund our exploration, development and acquisition program and for general corporate purposes.
At any time prior to July 15, 2015, we may redeem up to 35% of the 2023 Notes at a redemption price of 106.875% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date, with the proceeds of certain equity offerings as long as the redemption occurs within 180 days of completing such equity offering and at least 65% of the aggregate principal amount of the 2023 Notes remains outstanding after such redemption. Prior to July 15, 2017, we may redeem some or all of the 2023 Notes for cash at a redemption price equal to 100% of their principal amount plus an applicable make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. On and after July 15, 2017, we may redeem some or all of the 2023 Notes at redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal amount) equal to 103.438% for the twelve-month period beginning on July 15, 2017, 102.292% for the twelve-month period beginning on July 15, 2018, 101.146% for the twelve-month period beginning on July 15, 2019 and 100.00% beginning on July 15, 2020, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date.
On November 10, 2011, we issued $400.0 million of 6.5% senior unsecured notes due November 1, 2021 (the “2021 Notes”). Interest is payable on the 2021 Notes semi-annually in arrears on each May 1 and November 1, commencing May 1, 2012. The 2021 Notes are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by our material subsidiaries. The issuance of these 2021 Notes resulted in net proceeds to us of approximately $393.4 million, which we used to fund our exploration, development and acquisition program and for general corporate purposes.
Prior to November 1, 2016, we may redeem some or all of the 2021 Notes for cash at a redemption price equal to 100% of their principal amount plus an applicable make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. On and after November 1, 2016, we may redeem some or all of the 2021 Notes at redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal amount) equal to 103.25% for the twelve-month period beginning on November 1, 2016, 102.167% for the twelve-month period beginning on November 1, 2017, 101.083% for the twelve-month period beginning on November 1, 2018 and 100.00% beginning on November 1, 2019, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date.
On February 2, 2011, we issued $400.0 million of 7.25% senior unsecured notes due February 1, 2019 (the “2019 Notes”). Interest is payable on the 2019 Notes semi-annually in arrears on each February 1 and August 1, commencing August 1, 2011. The 2019 Notes are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by our material subsidiaries. The issuance of these 2019 Notes resulted in net proceeds to us of approximately $390.0 million, which we used to fund our exploration, development and acquisition program and for general corporate purposes.
32
Table of Contents
Prior to February 1, 2015, we may redeem some or all of the 2019 Notes for cash at a redemption price equal to 100% of their principal amount plus an applicable make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. On and after February 1, 2015, we may redeem some or all of the 2019 Notes at redemption prices (expressed as percentages of the principal amount) equal to 103.625% for the twelve-month period beginning on February 1, 2015, 101.813% for the twelve-month period beginning on February 1, 2016 and 100.00% beginning on February 1, 2017, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date.
The indentures governing our 2019 Notes, 2021 Notes, 2022 Notes and 2023 Notes (collectively, the “Notes”) restrict our ability and the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to: (i) incur additional debt or enter into sale and leaseback transactions; (ii) pay distributions on, redeem or repurchase equity interests; (iii) make certain investments; (iv) incur liens; (v) enter into transactions with affiliates; (vi) merge or consolidate with another company; and (vii) transfer and sell assets. These covenants are subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications. If at any time when our Notes are rated investment grade by both Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. and Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services and no Default (as defined in the indentures) has occurred and is continuing, many of such covenants will terminate and we will cease to be subject to such covenants.
Senior secured revolving line of credit
. On April 5, 2013, we entered into the Second Amended Credit Facility, which has a maturity date of April 5, 2018. The Second Amended Credit Facility is restricted to the borrowing base, which is reserve-based and subject to semi-annual redeterminations on April 1 and October 1 of each year. On September 30, 2014, the lenders under the Second Amended Credit Facility (the “Lenders”) completed their regular semi-annual redetermination of the borrowing base scheduled for October 1, 2014, resulting in an increase to the borrowing base from $
1,750.0 million
to $
2,000.0 million
. However, we elected to limit the Lenders’ aggregate commitment to
$1,500.0 million
. The overall senior secured line of credit under our Second Amended Credit Facility is
$2,500.0 million
as of
September 30, 2014
.
Borrowings under our Second Amended Credit Facility are collateralized by perfected first priority liens and security interests on substantially all of our assets, including mortgage liens on oil and natural gas properties having at least
80%
of the reserve value as determined by reserve reports. At our election, interest is generally determined by reference to (i) the London interbank offered rate (“LIBOR”) plus an applicable margin between
1.50%
and
2.50%
per annum; or (ii) a domestic bank prime rate plus an applicable margin between
0.00%
and
1.00%
per annum.
As of
September 30, 2014
, we had
$350.0 million
of borrowings and
$5.2 million
outstanding letters of credit under our Second Amended Credit Facility, resulting in an unused borrowing base committed capacity of
$1,144.8 million
.
The Second Amended Credit Facility also contains certain financial covenants and customary events of default. If an event of default occurs and is continuing, the Lenders may declare all amounts outstanding under our Second Amended Credit Facility to be immediately due and payable. As of
September 30, 2014
, we were in compliance with the financial covenants of our Second Amended Credit Facility.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Net Income are supplemental non-GAAP financial measures that are used by management and external users of our consolidated financial statements, such as industry analysts, investors, lenders and rating agencies. These non-GAAP measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net income, operating income, net cash provided by operating activities or any other measures prepared under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Because Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Net Income exclude some but not all items that affect net income and may vary among companies, the amounts presented may not be comparable to similar metrics of other companies.
Adjusted EBITDA
We define Adjusted EBITDA as earnings before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation, depletion, amortization, exploration expenses and other similar non-cash or non-recurring charges. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of net income or cash flows as determined by GAAP. Management believes that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA provides useful additional information to investors and analysts for assessing our results of operations and our ability to incur and service debt and to fund capital expenditures.
The following table presents reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measure of Adjusted EBITDA to the GAAP financial measures of net income and net cash provided by operating activities for the periods presented:
33
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2014
2013
2014
2013
(In thousands)
Adjusted EBITDA reconciliation to net income:
Net income
$
121,587
$
54,499
$
330,373
$
173,469
Gain on sale of properties
(43
)
—
(187,076
)
—
Non-cash change in fair value of derivative instruments
(114,555
)
31,750
(45,026
)
36,703
Interest expense
39,420
22,854
118,568
65,429
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
106,972
72,728
295,520
205,779
Impairment of oil and gas properties
1,439
56
2,243
762
Exploration expenses
1,100
463
1,955
2,712
Stock-based compensation expenses
6,077
3,040
15,755
8,411
Income tax expense
76,484
33,715
201,290
102,626
Other non-cash adjustments
351
515
(277
)
589
Adjusted EBITDA
$
238,832
$
219,620
$
733,325
$
596,480
Adjusted EBITDA reconciliation to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
187,238
$
178,874
$
673,492
$
536,681
Derivative settlements
(11,129
)
(8,067
)
(24,773
)
(5,135
)
Interest expense
39,420
22,854
118,568
65,429
Exploration expenses
1,100
463
1,955
2,712
Deferred financing costs amortization and other
(1,989
)
(940
)
(5,209
)
(2,693
)
Current tax expense
(2,369
)
(555
)
3,742
382
Changes in working capital
26,210
26,476
(34,173
)
(1,485
)
Other non-cash adjustments
351
515
(277
)
589
Adjusted EBITDA
$
238,832
$
219,620
$
733,325
$
596,480
Adjusted Net Income
We define Adjusted Net Income as net income after adjusting first for (1) the impact of certain non-cash and non-recurring items, including non-cash changes in the fair value of derivative instruments, impairment of oil and gas properties and other similar non-cash and non-recurring charges, and then (2) the non-cash and non-recurring items’ impact on taxes based on our effective tax rate in the same period. Adjusted Net Income is not a measure of net income as determined by GAAP. We define Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share as Adjusted Net Income divided by diluted weighted average shares outstanding. Management believes that the presentation of Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share provides useful additional information to investors and analysts for evaluating our operational trends and performance.
34
Table of Contents
The following table provides reconciliations of the GAAP financial measure of net income to the non-GAAP financial measure of Adjusted Net Income and the GAAP financial measure of diluted earnings per share to the non-GAAP financial measure of Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share for the periods presented:
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2014
2013
2014
2013
(In thousands, except per share data)
Net income
$
121,587
$
54,499
$
330,373
$
173,469
Non-cash change in fair value of derivative instruments
(114,555
)
31,750
(45,026
)
36,703
Gain on sale of properties
(43
)
—
(187,076
)
—
Impairment of oil and gas properties
1,439
56
2,243
762
Other non-cash adjustments
351
515
(277
)
589
Tax impact
(1)
43,560
(12,329
)
87,131
(14,237
)
Adjusted Net Income
$
52,339
$
74,491
$
187,368
$
197,286
Diluted earnings per share
$
1.21
$
0.59
$
3.29
$
1.87
Non-cash change in fair value of derivative instruments
(1.14
)
0.34
(0.45
)
0.40
Gain on sale of properties
—
—
(1.86
)
—
Impairment of oil and gas properties
0.01
—
0.02
0.01
Other non-cash adjustments
—
0.01
—
0.01
Tax impact
(1)
0.44
(0.14
)
0.87
(0.16
)
Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share
$
0.52
$
0.80
$
1.87
$
2.13
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
100,306
92,836
100,356
92,838
Effective tax rate
38.6
%
38.2
%
37.9
%
37.2
%
____________________
(1)
The tax impact is computed utilizing our effective tax rate on the adjustments for certain non-cash and non-recurring items.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
See Note 6 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our money market funds and derivative instruments and their related fair value measurements. See also Item 3. “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” below.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
There have been no material changes in our critical accounting policies and estimates from those disclosed in our
2013
Annual Report other than those noted below.
Recent accounting pronouncements
Revenue recognition.
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(“ASU 2014-09”). The objective of ASU 2014-09 is greater consistency and comparability across industries by using a five-step model to recognize revenue from customer contracts. ASU 2014-09 also contains some new disclosure requirements under GAAP and is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We are currently evaluating the effect that adopting this new guidance will have on our financial position, cash flows and results of operations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Currently, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined by the SEC. In the ordinary course of business, we enter into various commitment agreements and other contractual obligations, some of which are not recognized in our consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. See Note 14 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a description of our commitments and contingencies.
35
Table of Contents
Item 3. — Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The following market risk disclosures should be read in conjunction with the quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk contained in our
2013
Annual Report, as well as with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
We are exposed to a variety of market risks including commodity price risk, interest rate risk and counterparty and customer risk. We address these risks through a program of risk management, including the use of derivative instruments.
Commodity price exposure risk.
We are exposed to market risk as the prices of oil and natural gas fluctuate as a result of changes in supply and demand and other factors. To partially reduce price risk caused by these market fluctuations, we have entered into derivative instruments in the past and expect to enter into derivative instruments in the future to cover a significant portion of our future production.
We utilize derivative financial instruments to manage risks related to changes in oil prices. As of
September 30, 2014
, we utilized two-way and three-way costless collar options, swaps, swaps with sub-floors and deferred premium puts to reduce the volatility of oil prices on a significant portion of our future expected oil production. A two-way collar is a combination of options: a sold call and a purchased put. The purchased put establishes a minimum price (floor) and the sold call establishes a maximum price (ceiling) we will receive for the volumes under contract. A three-way collar is a combination of options: a sold call, a purchased put and a sold put. The purchased put establishes a minimum price (floor), unless the market price falls below the sold put (sub-floor), at which point the minimum price would be WTI crude oil index price plus the difference between the purchased put and the sold put strike price. The sold call establishes a maximum price (ceiling) we will receive for the volumes under contract. A swap is a sold call and a purchased put established at the same price (both ceiling and floor). A swap with a sub-floor is a swap coupled with a sold put (sub-floor) at which point the minimum price would be WTI crude oil index price plus the difference between the swap and the sold put strike price. For the deferred premium puts, we agree to pay a premium to the counterparty at the time of settlement. At settlement, if the WTI price is below the floor price of the put, we receive the difference between the floor price and the WTI price multiplied by the contract volumes, less the premium. If the WTI price settles at or above the floor price of the put, we pay only the premium.
We recognize all derivative instruments at fair value. The credit standing of our counterparties is analyzed and factored into the fair value amounts recognized on the balance sheet. Derivative assets and liabilities arising from our derivative contracts with the same counterparty are also reported on a net basis, as all counterparty contracts provide for net settlement.
The following is a summary of our derivative contracts as of
September 30, 2014
:
Weighted Average Deferred Premium
Settlement
Period
Derivative
Instrument
Total
Notional
Amount of Oil
Weighted Average Prices
Fair Value
Asset
(Liability)
Swap
Sub-Floor
Floor
Ceiling
(Barrels)
($/Barrel)
(In thousands)
2014
Two-way collars
1,088,000
$
95.07
$
106.42
$
4,893
2014
Three-way collars
842,000
$
70.55
$
90.55
$
105.16
1,066
2014
Swaps
994,000
$
96.32
3,942
2014
Swaps with sub-floors
552,000
$
92.60
$
70.00
690
2015
Two-way collars
2,388,500
$
87.98
$
103.21
9,574
2015
Three-way collars
263,500
$
70.59
$
90.59
$
105.25
869
2015
Swaps
5,263,500
$
90.81
14,093
2015
Swaps with sub-floors
186,000
$
92.60
$
70.00
538
2015
Deferred premium puts
1,086,000
$
90.00
$
2.55
2,919
2016
Two-way collars
155,000
$
86.00
$
103.42
692
2016
Swaps
310,000
$
90.15
1,020
$
40,296
Interest rate risk.
We had (i)
$400.0 million
of senior unsecured notes at a fixed cash interest rate of 7.25% per annum, (ii)
$400.0 million
of senior unsecured notes at a fixed cash interest rate of 6.5% per annum and (iii) $1,400.0 million of senior unsecured notes at a fixed cash interest rate of 6.875% per annum outstanding at
September 30, 2014
. At
September 30, 2014
, we had
$350.0 million
of borrowings and
$5.2 million
letters of credit outstanding under our Second Amended Credit Facility, which were subject to varying rates of interest based on (1) the total outstanding borrowings (including the value of all outstanding letters of credit) in relation to the borrowing base and (2) whether the loan is a LIBOR loan or a domestic bank prime interest rate loan (defined in the Second Amended Credit Facility as an Alternate Based Rate or “ABR” loan). At
September 30, 2014
, the outstanding borrowings under our Second Amended Credit Facility bore interest at LIBOR plus a
36
Table of Contents
1.5% margin. We do not currently, but may in the future, utilize interest rate derivatives to alter interest rate exposure in an attempt to reduce interest rate expense related to debt issued under our Second Amended Credit Facility. Interest rate derivatives would be used solely to modify interest rate exposure and not to modify the overall leverage of the debt portfolio.
Counterparty and customer credit risk.
Joint interest receivables arise from billing entities which own partial interest in the wells we operate. These entities participate in our wells primarily based on their ownership in leases on which we choose to drill. We have limited ability to control participation in our wells. We are also subject to credit risk due to concentration of our oil and natural gas receivables with several significant customers. The inability or failure of our significant customers to meet their obligations to us or their insolvency or liquidation may adversely affect our financial results. In addition, our oil and natural gas derivative arrangements expose us to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by counterparties. However, in order to mitigate the risk of nonperformance, we only enter into derivative contracts with counterparties that are high credit-quality financial institutions, most of which are lenders under our Second Amended Credit Facility. This risk is also managed by spreading our derivative exposure across several institutions and limiting the hedged volumes placed under individual contracts.
While we do not require all of our customers to post collateral and we do not have a formal process in place to evaluate and assess the credit standing of our significant customers for oil and natural gas receivables and the counterparties on our derivative instruments, we do evaluate the credit standing of such counterparties as we deem appropriate under the circumstances. This evaluation may include reviewing a counterparty’s credit rating, latest financial information and, in the case of a customer with which we have receivables, their historical payment record, the financial ability of the customer’s parent company to make payment if the customer cannot and undertaking the due diligence necessary to determine credit terms and credit limits. Several of our significant customers for oil and natural gas receivables have a credit rating below investment grade or do not have rated debt securities. In these circumstances, we have considered the lack of investment grade credit rating in addition to the other factors described above.
We may, from time to time, purchase commercial paper instruments from high credit quality counterparties. These counterparties may include issuers in a variety of industries including the domestic and foreign financial sector. Our investment policy requires that our counterparties have minimum credit ratings thresholds and provides maximum counterparty exposure values. Although we do not anticipate any of our commercial paper issuers being unable to pay us upon maturity, we take a risk in purchasing the commercial paper instruments available in the marketplace. If a commercial paper issuer is unable to return investment proceeds to us at the maturity date, it could take a significant amount of time to recover all or a portion of the assets originally invested. Our commercial paper balance was $36,000 at
September 30, 2014
.
Most of the counterparties on our derivative instruments currently in place are lenders under our Second Amended Credit Facility with investment grade ratings. We are likely to enter into future derivative instruments with these or other lenders under our Second Amended Credit Facility, which also carry investment grade ratings. Furthermore, the agreements with each of the counterparties on our derivative instruments contain netting provisions. As a result of these netting provisions, our maximum amount of loss due to credit risk is limited to the net amounts due to and from the counterparties under the derivative contracts. We had a net derivative asset position of
$40.3 million
at
September 30, 2014
.
Item 4. — Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act, we have evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), our principal executive officer; Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), our principal financial officer; and Chief Accounting Officer (“CAO”), the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of
September 30, 2014
. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed or submitted by us under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO, CFO and CAO as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this evaluation, our CEO, CFO and CAO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at
September 30, 2014
.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the three months ended
September 30, 2014
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
37
Table of Contents
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. — Legal Proceedings
See Part I, Item 1, Note 14 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements entitled “Commitments and Contingencies,” which is incorporated in this item by reference.
Item 1A. — Risk Factors
Our business faces many risks. Any of the risks discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and our other SEC filings could have a material impact on our business, financial position or results of operations. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also impair our business operations.
For a discussion of our potential risks and uncertainties, see the information in Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our
2013
Annual Report. There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those described in our
2013
Annual Report.
Item 2. — Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Unregistered sales of securities.
There were no sales of unregistered equity securities during the period covered by this report.
Issuer purchases of equity securities.
The following table contains information about our acquisition of equity securities during the three months ended
September 30, 2014
:
Period
Total Number
of Shares
Exchanged
(1)
Average Price
Paid
per Share
Total Number of Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs
Maximum Number (or Approximate
Dollar Value) of Shares that May Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs
July 1 - July 31, 2014
876
$
55.81
—
—
August 1 - August 31, 2014
18,528
51.69
—
—
September 1 - September 30, 2014
19,116
48.07
—
—
Total
38,520
$
49.99
—
—
___________________
(1)
Represent shares that employees surrendered back to us that equaled in value the amount of taxes needed for payroll tax withholding obligations upon the vesting of restricted stock awards. These repurchases were not part of a publicly announced program to repurchase shares of our common stock, nor do we have a publicly announced program to repurchase shares of our common stock.
Item 6. — Exhibits
Exhibit
No.
Description of Exhibit
10.1
Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of September 30, 2014 among Oasis Petroleum Inc., as Parent, Oasis Petroleum North America LLC, as Borrower, the Other Credit Parties party thereto, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and the Lenders party thereto (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K on October 2, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
31.1(a)
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 certification of Principal Executive Officer.
31.2(a)
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 certification of Principal Financial Officer.
32.1(b)
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906 certification of Principal Executive Officer.
32.2(b)
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906 certification of Principal Financial Officer.
101.INS (a)
XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH (a)
XBRL Schema Document.
101.CAL (a)
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF (a)
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB (a)
XBRL Labels Linkbase Document.
101.PRE (a)
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document.
38
Table of Contents
___________________
(a)
Filed herewith.
(b)
Furnished herewith.
39
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
OASIS PETROLEUM INC.
Date:
November 5, 2014
By:
/s/ Thomas B. Nusz
Thomas B. Nusz
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:
/s/ Michael H. Lou
Michael H. Lou
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
By:
/s/ Roy W. Mace
Roy W. Mace
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
40
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
No.
Description of Exhibit
10.1
Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of September 30, 2014 among Oasis Petroleum Inc., as Parent, Oasis Petroleum North America LLC, as Borrower, the Other Credit Parties party thereto, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and the Lenders party thereto (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K on October 2, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
31.1(a)
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 certification of Principal Executive Officer.
31.2(a)
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 certification of Principal Financial Officer.
32.1(b)
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906 certification of Principal Executive Officer.
32.2(b)
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906 certification of Principal Financial Officer.
101.INS (a)
XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH (a)
XBRL Schema Document.
101.CAL (a)
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF (a)
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB (a)
XBRL Labels Linkbase Document.
101.PRE (a)
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document.
___________________
(a)
Filed herewith.
(b)
Furnished herewith.
41