UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
OR
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-14875
FTI CONSULTING, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
(561) 515-1900
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web Site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class
Outstanding at July 28, 2011
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share
FTI CONSULTING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A.
Item 5.
Item 6.
SIGNATURES
FTI Consulting, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash
Accounts receivable:
Billed receivables
Unbilled receivables
Allowance for doubtful accounts and unbilled services
Accounts receivable, net
Current portion of notes receivable
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Income taxes receivable
Total current assets
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
Goodwill
Other intangible assets, net of amortization
Notes receivable, net of current portion
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other
Accrued compensation
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations
Billings in excess of services provided
Deferred income taxes
Total current liabilities
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, net of current portion
Other liabilities
Total liabilities
Commitments and contingent liabilities (notes 7, 9 and 10)
Stockholders’ equity
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; shares authorized—5,000; none outstanding
Common stock, $0.01 par value; shares authorized—75,000; shares issued and outstanding—41,555 (2011) and 46,144 (2010)
Additional paid-in capital
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Total stockholders’ equity
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements
3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(in thousands, except per share data)
Unaudited
Revenues
Operating expenses
Direct cost of revenues
Selling, general and administrative expense
Special charges
Amortization of other intangible assets
Operating income
Other income (expense)
Interest income and other
Interest expense
Income before income tax provision
Income tax provision
Net income
Earnings per common share—basic
Earnings per common share—diluted
4
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income
(in thousands)
Balance January 1, 2011
Comprehensive income:
Cumulative translation adjustment, including income tax benefit of $2,068
Total comprehensive income
Issuance of common stock in connection with:
Exercise of options, including income tax benefit from share-based awards of $68
Restricted share grants, less net settled shares of 84
Stock units issued under incentive compensation plan
Business combinations
Purchase and retirement of common stock
Share-based compensation
Balance June 30, 2011
5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Operating activities
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization and accretion
Provision for doubtful accounts
Non-cash share-based compensation
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation
Non-cash interest expense
Other
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions:
Accounts receivable, billed and unbilled
Notes receivable
Prepaid expenses and other assets
Income taxes
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
Investing activities
Payments for acquisition of businesses, net of cash received
Purchases of property and equipment
Proceeds from sale or maturity of short-term investments
Net cash used in investing activities
Financing activities
Borrowings under revolving line of credit
Payments of revolving line of credit
Payments of long-term debt and capital lease obligations
Net issuance of common stock under equity compensation plans
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
Supplemental cash flow disclosures
Cash paid for interest
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Issuance of stock units under incentive compensation plans
Issuance of notes payable to acquire businesses
6
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollar and share amounts in tables expressed in thousands, except per share data)
1. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and under the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim financial information. Some of the information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations. In management’s opinion, the interim financial statements reflect all adjustments that are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. All adjustments made were normal recurring accruals. Results of operations for the interim periods presented herein are not necessarily indicative of results of operations for a full year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
2. New Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which amends current comprehensive income guidance. This accounting update eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of shareholders’ equity. Instead, the company must report comprehensive income in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income which contains two sections, net income and other comprehensive income, or in two separate but consecutive statements. This guidance will be effective for us beginning in the first quarter of 2012. We do not expect the guidance to impact our consolidated financial statements, as it only requires a change in the format of presentation.
3. Earnings Per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share are calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share adjust basic earnings per share for the effects of potentially dilutive common shares. Potentially dilutive common shares include the dilutive effects of shares issuable under our equity compensation plans, including stock options and restricted stock, and shares issuable upon conversion of our 3 3/4% senior subordinated convertible notes due 2012 (“Convertible Notes”) assuming the conversion premium was converted into common stock based on the average closing price per share of our stock during the period, each using the treasury stock method. The conversion feature of our Convertible Notes had a dilutive effect on our earnings per share for the periods presented below because the average closing price per share of our common stock for such periods was above the conversion price of the Convertible Notes of $31.25 per share.
Numerator—basic and diluted
Denominator
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding—basic
Effect of dilutive stock options
Effect of dilutive convertible notes
Effect of dilutive restricted shares
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding—diluted
Antidilutive stock options and restricted shares
7
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
4. Special Charges
During the year ended December 31, 2010, we recorded special charges of $52.0 million, of which $32.3 million was non-cash. The non-cash charges primarily included trade name impairment charges related to our global FTI Consulting branding strategy and other strategic branding decisions. The remaining charges related to a realignment of our workforce and a consolidation of four office locations. The charges reflect actions we took to support our corporate positioning, as well as actions taken to better align capacity with expected demand, to eliminate certain redundancies resulting from acquisitions and to provide for appropriate levels of administrative support.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we recorded special charges of $16.8 million, of which $6.4 million was non-cash. The charges reflect actions we took to reduce senior management related overhead in connection with our recent realignment of our segment management on a global basis and to align our workforce with expected market trends. These actions included a reduction in workforce totaling 37 employees. The special charges consisted of:
$10.4 million of salary continuance and other contractual employee related costs associated with the reduction in workforce;
$3.6 million related to loan forgiveness and accelerated vesting of share-based awards related to the reduction in workforce; and
$2.8 million of deferred costs under a service contract without a substantive future economic benefit to the Company.
The following table details the special charges by segment for the quarter ended June 30, 2011:
Corporate Finance/Restructuring
Forensic and Litigation Consulting
Economic Consulting
Unallocated Corporate
Total
The total cash outflow associated with the 2010 special charges is expected to be $19.7 million, of which $19.1 million has been paid as of June 30, 2011. The total cash outflow associated with the 2011 special charges is expected to be $10.4 million, of which $0.5 million has been paid as of June 30, 2011. Of the remaining liability at June 30, 2011, $6.9 million is expected to be paid during the remainder of 2011 and the balance of approximately $3.6 million is expected to be paid during 2012. A liability for the amounts to be paid is included in “Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other” on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Activity related to the liability for these costs for the six months ended June 30, 2011 is as follows:
Balances at January 1, 2011
Additions
Payments
Adjustments
Balances at June 30, 2011
8
5. Provision for Doubtful Accounts
The provision for doubtful accounts is recorded after the related work has been billed to the client and we determine that full collectability is not reasonably assured. It is classified in “Selling, general and administrative expense” on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The provision for doubtful accounts totaled $3.2 million and $5.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively and $1.6 million and $4.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.
6. Research and Development Costs
Research and development costs related to software development totaled $6.0 million and $11.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, and $5.3 million and $10.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. Research and development costs are included in “Selling, general and administrative expense” on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
7. Financial Instruments
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
We consider the recorded value of certain of our financial assets and liabilities, which consist primarily of cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable, to approximate the fair value of the respective assets and liabilities at June 30, 2011, based on the short-term nature of the assets and liabilities. The fair value of our long-term debt at June 30, 2011 was $849.0 million compared to a carrying value of $814.8 million. At December 31, 2010, the fair value of our long-term debt was $847.2 million compared to a carrying value of $810.8 million. We determined the fair value of our long-term debt primarily based on quoted market prices for our 7 3/4% senior notes due 2016, 6 3/4% senior notes due 2020 and Convertible Notes. The carrying value of long-term debt includes the $18.0 million equity component of our Convertible Notes which is recorded in “Additional paid-in capital” on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Derivative Financial Instruments
From time to time, we hedge the cash flows and fair values of some of our long-term debt using interest rate swaps. We enter into these derivative contracts to manage our exposure to interest rate changes by achieving a desired proportion of fixed rate versus variable rate debt.
Accordingly, to achieve the desired mix of fixed and floating interest rate debt, we entered into four interest rate swap agreements in March 2011, which qualify and have been designated as fair value hedges. The interest rate swaps mature on October 1, 2016. Under the terms of the interest rate swaps, we receive interest on the $215.0 million notional amount at a fixed rate of 7 3/4% and pay a variable rate of interest, based on LIBOR as the benchmark interest rate. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, our variable interest rate was 5.48%. The maturity, payment dates and other critical terms of these swaps exactly match those of the hedged senior notes. These interest rate swaps qualified for hedge accounting using the short-cut method under ASC 815-20-25, Derivatives and Hedging (formerly SFAS No. 133), which assumes no hedge ineffectiveness. As a result, changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps and changes in the fair value of the hedged debt were assumed to be equal and offsetting. As of June 30, 2011, the fair value of our interest rate swaps was an asset of $2.2 million, which is recorded in “Other assets” on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The impact of effectively converting the interest rate of $215.0 million of our senior notes from fixed rate to variable rate decreased interest expense by $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011.
9
8. Acquisitions
In March 2011, we completed acquisitions of certain practices of LECG Corporation in Europe, the United States and Latin America with services relating to those provided through our Economic Consulting, Forensic and Litigation Consulting, and Corporate Finance/Restructuring segments. The acquisition-date fair value of the total consideration transferred is approximately $30.0 million, which consisted of $27.0 million of cash paid at the closings of these acquisitions, a portion of which is subject to certain working capital and other adjustments, and contingent consideration with an estimated fair value of $3.0 million. As part of the preliminary purchase price allocation, we recorded an aggregate of $24.6 million in accounts receivable, $6.0 million in identifiable intangible assets, $18.8 million of assumed liabilities and $14.9 million in goodwill. Aggregate acquisition-related costs of approximately $1.4 million have been recognized in earnings in the first quarter of 2011. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented because the acquisitions were not material in relation to our consolidated financial position or results of operations for the periods presented.
Certain acquisition-related restricted stock agreements entered into prior to January 1, 2009 contain stock price guarantees that may result in cash payments in the future if our share price falls below a specified per share market value on the date that the applicable stock restrictions lapse (the “determination date”). For those acquisitions, the future settlement of any contingency related to our common stock price will be recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we paid $6.2 million in cash in relation to the stock price guarantees on certain shares of common stock that became unrestricted, which was recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in-capital. Our remaining common stock price guarantee provisions have stock floor prices that range from $24.50 to $69.48 per share and have determination dates that range from 2011 to 2013.
9. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill by business segment for the six months ended June 30, 2011, are as follows:
Goodwill acquired during the period
Contingent consideration(1)
Foreign currency translation adjustment and other
Contingent consideration related to business combinations consummated prior to January 1, 2009.
Other intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives. For intangible assets with finite lives, we recorded amortization expense of $5.5 million and $11.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, and $5.9 million and $11.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. Based solely on the amortizable intangible assets recorded as of June 30, 2011, we estimate amortization expense to be $11.2 million during the remainder of 2011, $22.2 million in 2012, $20.4 million in 2013, $11.8 million in 2014, $10.8 million in 2015, $9.3 million in 2016 and $40.7 million in years
10
after 2016. Actual amortization expense to be reported in future periods could differ from these estimates as a result of new intangible asset acquisitions, finalization of asset valuations for newly acquired assets, changes in useful lives, changes in value due to foreign currency translation or other factors. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we wrote-off $26.3 million of fully amortized intangible assets related to our customer relationships, non-competition agreements, tradenames and contract backlog with a net book value of zero.
Amortized intangible assets
Customer relationships
Non-competition agreements
Software
Tradenames
Contract backlog
Unamortized intangible assets
10. Long-term Debt and Capital Lease Obligations
The components of long-term debt and capital lease obligations are presented in the table below:
7 3/4% senior notes due 2016(a)
6 3/4% senior notes due 2020
3 3/4% senior subordinated convertible notes due 2012(b)
Notes payable to former shareholders of acquired businesses
Total debt
Less current portion
Long-term debt, net of current portion
Total capital lease obligations
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion
Balance includes a fair value hedge adjustment of $2.2 million relating to interest rate swaps entered into on March 9, 2011.
Balance includes $149.9 million principal amount of Convertible Notes net of discount of $5.8 million at June 30, 2011 and $8.4 million at December 31, 2010.
11
Convertible Notes
Our Convertible Notes are convertible at the option of the holder during any conversion period if the per share closing price of our common stock exceeds the conversion threshold price of $37.50 for at least 20 trading days in the 30 consecutive trading day period ending on the first day of such conversion period. A conversion period is the period from and including the eleventh trading day in a fiscal quarter up to but not including the eleventh trading day of the following fiscal quarter.
When the Convertible Notes are convertible at the option of the holder, they are classified as current on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. When the Convertible Notes are not convertible at the option of the holder, and the scheduled maturity is not within one year after the balance sheet date, they are classified as long-term. As of June 30, 2011, the Convertible Notes are classified as long-term given that the per share price of our common stock did not close above the conversion threshold for 20 days in the 30 consecutive trading day period ended April 14, 2011. As of July 15, 2011, the Convertible Notes did not meet the conversion threshold and therefore, the Convertible Notes will remain non-convertible and classified as long-term through July 16, 2011, when the Convertible Notes will be a year from maturity and classified as short-term.
6 3/4% Senior Notes Due 2020
On September 27, 2010, we issued $400.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 6 3/4% senior notes due 2020 (“6 3/4% senior notes”) in a private offering (the “Offering”) that was exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). The 6 3/4% senior notes were sold to “qualified institutional buyers” as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act and non-U.S. persons outside the United States under Regulation S under the Securities Act. The net proceeds from the Offering were $390.4 million after deducting debt issuance costs. On March 25, 2011, the Company filed a Registration Statement on Form S-4 with the SEC to register the exchange offer of the 6 3/4% senior notes for publicly registered senior notes with identical terms, which was declared effective on May 24, 2011. The Company completed the exchange offer of all outstanding 6 3/4% senior notes on June 24, 2011.
11. Commitments and Contingencies
Contingencies
We are subject to legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In management’s opinion, we believe we have adequate legal defenses and/or insurance coverage with respect to the eventuality of such actions. We do not believe any settlement or judgment would materially affect our financial position or results of operations.
12. Share-Based Compensation
Share-based Awards and Share-based Compensation Expense
Our officers, employees, non-employee directors and certain individual service providers are eligible to participate in FTI Consulting’s equity compensation plans, subject to the discretion of the administrator of the plans. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, aggregate share-based awards included stock option grants exercisable for 744,147 shares of common stock upon vesting, restricted stock awards of 389,288 shares of common stock and restricted stock units equivalent to 353,835 shares of common stock.
12
Total share-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 is detailed in the following table:
Total share-based compensation expense
13. Stockholders’ Equity
Common Stock Repurchase Program
In November 2009, our Board of Directors authorized a two-year stock repurchase program of up to $500.0 million (the “Repurchase Program”) and terminated the $50.0 million stock repurchase program authorized in February 2009. Also in November 2009, we entered into a collared stock buyback master confirmation agreement (the “Master Agreement”) with Goldman, Sachs & Co. (“Goldman Sachs”). Through December 31, 2010, we repurchased and retired approximately 6,633,680 shares of our common stock with a value equivalent to approximately $290.6 million at the time of repurchase under the Repurchase Program, including a $250.0 million accelerated stock buyback transaction pursuant to a supplemental confirmation under the Master Agreement. As of December 31, 2010, a balance of $209.4 million remained available under the Repurchase Program to fund stock repurchases by the Company.
On March 2, 2011, we entered into a supplemental confirmation with Goldman Sachs for a $209.4 million accelerated stock buyback (the “2011 ASB”), pursuant to the Master Agreement. On March 7, 2011, we paid $209.4 million to Goldman Sachs using available cash on hand and received a majority of the shares of FTI Consulting common stock, representing 4,433,671 shares, expected to be delivered in the 2011 ASB. On May 17, 2011, FTI Consulting received additional shares bringing the total number of shares of our common stock delivered in the 2011 ASB to 5,061,558 shares of FTI Consulting common stock. The specific number of shares that ultimately will be repurchased in the 2011 ASB will be based generally on the volume-weighted average share price of our common stock during the term of the repurchase agreement, subject to provisions that establish minimum and maximum numbers of shares. The 2011 ASB contemplates that final settlement may occur in December 2011, although under certain circumstances, at Goldman Sachs’ discretion, the completion date may be accelerated. At settlement, we may be entitled to receive additional shares of our common stock from Goldman Sachs. This transaction was accounted for as two separate transactions, a share repurchase and a forward contract indexed to our own stock. The repurchase of shares was accounted for as a share retirement resulting in a reduction of common stock issued and outstanding of 5,061,558 shares and a corresponding reduction in common stock and additional paid-in capital of $209.4 million. Any additional shares received will be accounted for as a share retirement in the period(s) in which the shares are received. The 2011 ASB completes the Repurchase Program.
For the quarter ended June 30, 2011, the forward contract was anti-dilutive as the forward contract represented a contingent number of shares that could be delivered to FTI Consulting by the investment bank. As the shares were anti-dilutive, their impact was not considered in the computation of earnings per share for the
13
quarter ended June 30, 2011 in accordance with the guidance of ASC 260, Earnings Per Share. Additional shares that may be received before the final settlement date in December 2011 will be considered in the calculation of weighted average shares outstanding used for the calculation of earnings per share after delivery to FTI Consulting.
14. Segment Reporting
We manage our business in five reportable operating segments: Corporate Finance/Restructuring, Forensic and Litigation Consulting, Economic Consulting, Technology and Strategic Communications.
Our Corporate Finance/Restructuring segment focuses on strategic, operational, financial and capital needs of businesses around the world and provides consulting and advisory services on a wide range of matters, such as restructuring (including bankruptcy), financings, claims management, mergers and acquisitions, post-acquisition integration, valuations, tax issues and performance improvement.
Our Forensic and Litigation Consulting segment provides law firms, companies, government clients and other interested parties with dispute advisory, investigations, forensic accounting, data analytics, business intelligence assessments and risk mitigation services.
Our Economic Consulting segment provides law firms, companies, government entities and other interested parties with analysis of complex economic issues for use in legal and regulatory proceedings, strategic decision making and public policy debates in the U.S. and around the world.
Our Technology segment provides electronic discovery (“e-discovery”) and information management software and services to its clients. It provides products, services and consulting to companies, law firms, courts and government agencies worldwide. Its comprehensive suite of software and services help clients locate, review and produce electronically stored information, including e-mail, computer files, voicemail, instant messaging and financial and transactional data.
Our Strategic Communications segment provides advice and consulting services relating to financial communications, brand communications, public affairs and reputation management and business consulting.
We evaluate the performance of our operating segments based on adjusted segment EBITDA. We define adjusted segment EBITDA as a segment’s share of consolidated operating income before depreciation, amortization of intangible assets, accretion of contingent consideration and special charges. Although adjusted segment EBITDA is not a measure of financial condition or performance determined in accordance with GAAP, we use adjusted segment EBITDA to evaluate and compare the operating performance of our segments.
14
The table below presents revenues and adjusted segment EBITDA for our reportable segments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
Technology
Strategic Communications
Total revenues
Adjusted segment EBITDA
Total adjusted segment EBITDA
The table below reconciles adjusted segment EBITDA to income before income tax provision:
Segment depreciation expense
Amortization of intangible assets
Accretion of contingent consideration
Unallocated corporate expenses, excluding special charges
15. Supplemental Condensed Consolidating Guarantor and Non-Guarantor Financial Information
Substantially all of our domestic subsidiaries are guarantors of borrowings under our senior bank credit facility, senior notes and our Convertible Notes. The guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several. All of our guarantors are wholly-owned, direct or indirect, subsidiaries.
15
The following financial information presents condensed consolidating balance sheets, statements of income and statements of cash flows for FTI Consulting, all the guarantor subsidiaries, all the non-guarantor subsidiaries and the eliminations necessary to arrive at the consolidated information for FTI Consulting and its subsidiaries. For purposes of this presentation, we have accounted for our investments in our subsidiaries using the equity method of accounting. The principal eliminating entries eliminate investment in subsidiary and intercompany balances and transactions.
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet Information as of June 30, 2011
Intercompany receivables
Other current assets
Property and equipment, net
Other intangible assets, net
Investments in subsidiaries
Liabilities
Intercompany payables
Other current liabilities
Long-term debt, net
16
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet Information as of December 31, 2010
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
Other (expense) income
Income (loss) before income tax provision
Income tax (benefit) provision
Equity in net earnings of subsidiaries
17
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
Income tax provision (benefit)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
18
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flow for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
Payments under revolving line of credit
Net issuance of common stock and other
Intercompany transfers
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
19
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flow for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
Purchases of property and equipment and other
Payments of revolving linet of credit
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
20
The following is a discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and significant factors that could affect our prospective financial condition and results of operations. This discussion should be read together with the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes and with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Historical results and any discussion of prospective results may not indicate our future performance. See “Forward Looking Statements.”
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
We are a leading global business advisory firm dedicated to helping organizations protect and enhance their enterprise value. We work closely with our clients to help them anticipate, understand, manage and overcome complex business matters arising from such factors as the economy, financial and credit markets, governmental regulation and legislation and litigation. We assist clients in addressing a broad range of business challenges, such as restructuring (including bankruptcy), financing and credit issues and indebtedness, interim business management, forensic accounting and litigation services, mergers and acquisitions (“M&A”), antitrust and competition matters, electronic discovery (“e-discovery”), management and retrieval of electronically stored information, reputation management and strategic communications. We also provide services to help our clients take advantage of economic, regulatory, financial and other business opportunities. Our experienced teams of professionals include many individuals who are widely recognized as experts in their respective fields. We believe clients retain us because of our recognized expertise and capabilities in highly specialized areas as well as our reputation for satisfying client needs.
We report financial results for the following five operating segments:
Our Corporate Finance/Restructuring segment focuses on strategic, operational, financial and capital needs of businesses around the world and provides consulting and advisory services on a wide range of matters, such as restructuring (including bankruptcy), financing, claims management, M&A, post-acquisition integration, valuations, tax issues and performance improvement.
Our Forensic and Litigation Consulting (“FLC”) segment provides law firms, companies, government clients and other interested parties with dispute advisory, investigations, forensic accounting, data analytics, business intelligence assessments and risk mitigation services.
Our Technology segment provides e-discovery and information management software and services to its clients. It provides products, services and consulting to companies, law firms, courts and government agencies worldwide. Its comprehensive suite of software and services help clients locate, review and produce electronically stored information, including e-mail, computer files, voicemail, instant messaging and financial and transactional data.
We derive substantially all of our revenues from providing professional services to both U.S. and international clients. Over the past several years the growth in our revenues and profitability has resulted from our ability to attract new and recurring engagements and from the acquisitions we have completed.
21
Most of our services are rendered under time and expense arrangements that obligate the client to pay us a fee for the hours that we incur at agreed upon rates. Under this arrangement, we typically bill our clients for reimbursable expenses, which may include the cost of producing our work product and other direct expenses that we incur on behalf of the client, such as travel costs. We also render services for which certain clients may be required to pay us a fixed-fee or recurring retainer. These arrangements are generally cancellable at any time. Some of our engagements contain performance-based arrangements in which we earn a success fee when and if certain predefined outcomes occur. This type of success fee may supplement a time-and-expense or fixed-fee arrangement. Success fee revenues may cause variations in our revenues and operating results due to the timing of achieving the performance-based criteria. In our Technology segment, certain clients are also billed based on the amount of data stored on our electronic systems, the volume of information processed and the number of users licensing our Ringtail® software products for installation within their own environments. We license these products directly to end users as well as indirectly through our channel partner relationships. Seasonal factors, such as the timing of our employees’ and clients’ vacations and holidays, impact the timing of our revenues.
Our financial results are primarily driven by:
the number, size and type of engagements we secure;
the rate per hour or fixed charges we charge our clients for services;
the utilization rates of the revenue-generating professionals we employ;
the number of revenue-generating professionals;
fees from clients on a retained basis or other; and
licensing of our software products and other technology services.
We define adjusted EBITDA as consolidated operating income before depreciation, amortization of intangible assets, accretion of contingent consideration (often referred to as earn-outs) and special charges. We define adjusted segment EBITDA as a segment’s share of consolidated operating income before depreciation, amortization of intangible assets, accretion of contingent consideration and special charges. Adjusted EBITDA and adjusted segment EBITDA are not defined in the same manner by all companies and may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies unless the definition is the same. These non-GAAP measures should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for or superior to, the information contained in our statements of income. We believe that each of these measures can be a useful operating performance measure for evaluating our results of operations as compared from period-to-period and as compared to our competitors. EBITDA is a common alternative measure of operating performance used by investors, financial analysts and rating agencies to value and compare the financial performance of companies in our industry. We use adjusted EBITDA and adjusted segment EBITDA to evaluate and compare the operating performance of our segments.
We define adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per diluted share as net income and earnings per diluted share, respectively, excluding the impact of the special charges and loss on early extinguishment of debt that were incurred in that period, and their related income tax effects.
We define acquisition growth as the results of operations of acquired companies in the first twelve months following the effective date of an acquisition. Our definition of organic growth is the change in the results of operations excluding the impact of all such acquisitions.
22
EXECUTIVE HIGHLIGHTS
Adjusted earnings per common share—diluted
Adjusted EBITDA
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities
Total number of employees at June 30,
Second Quarter 2011 Executive Highlights
Revenues for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 increased by 14.7% or $51.4 million to $400.4 million, compared to $349.0 million in the same prior year period, with approximately 2% of the increase due to favorable currency translation related primarily to our UK based operations. Organic growth of 4.3% and acquisition growth of 8.6% made up the remainder.
Our second quarter revenue results reflected strength in our Economic Consulting, Technology, FLC and Strategic Communications segments which included the impact from our acquisitions of several practices from LECG Corporation at the end of March 2011. Our Corporate Finance/Restructuring segment continues to be affected by a decline in restructuring activity, partially offset by revenues generated by the business in Asia acquired in the third quarter of 2010 and improvement in its Healthcare practice. Our other four segments accounted for approximately 25% of such revenue growth which more than overcame the decline in the Corporate Finance/Restructuring segment.
Adjusted EBITDA, as previously defined, increased by 1.6% or $1.1 million to $66.5 million, or 16.6% of revenues, compared to $65.5 million, or 18.8% of revenues, in the prior year period. Adjusted EBITDA increased with strong revenue performance in the Economic and Technology segments which was largely offset by the impact of the decline in Corporate Finance/Restructuring revenue.
Earnings per share
Earnings per diluted share for the three months ended June 30, 2011 were $0.40, which included $16.8 million of special charges primarily related to workforce realignments, compared to $0.52 in the prior year period. Adjusted earnings per diluted share, as previously defined, were $0.64, compared to $0.52 in the prior year period due to the impact of the operating results described above and an 11.7% reduction in fully diluted shares outstanding compared to the prior year period due to the repurchase of 5.1 million shares through June 2011 under the $209.4 million accelerated stock buyback with Goldman, Sachs & Co. (the “2011 ASB”).
Operating cash flows
Cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was $26.4 million as compared to $49.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The decline was primarily a result of a shift in the relative mix of receivables towards clients and geographic regions that traditionally have longer billing and collection cycles, particularly related to revenue growth in our Economic Consulting business and our Asia region in general. Overall, cash collections for the quarter were strong at approximately $349 million, and the current collection experience of our accounts receivable by practice has not changed materially.
23
Headcount
Headcount of 3,740 at June 30, 2011 increased by 374, or 11.1%, compared to the same period a year ago including approximately 200 professionals who joined FTI Consulting as a result of the professionals who joined us from LECG in the first quarter of 2011 along with approximately 130 professionals who joined us with the practices in Asia acquired in the third quarter of 2010. Headcount increased in all segments, but most notably in our Economic Consulting and FLC segments, through a combination of hiring to support the growth of these businesses and the addition of employees who joined the Company through acquisitions completed during the previous twelve months. Headcount in the Corporate Finance/Restructuring segment increased due to the acquisition of the practices in Asia in the third quarter of 2010, partially offset by staff reductions made in 2010 and 2011 to balance current demands with resource requirements.
Other strategic activities
We recorded special charges in the three months ended June 30, 2011 of $16.8 million which reduced our fully diluted earnings per share by $0.24. These charges are primarily comprised of salary continuation, loan forgiveness and equity acceleration associated with a reduction in workforce totaling 37 employees, primarily in our Corporate Finance/Restructuring segment. The charges reflect actions we took to reduce key management overhead in connection with the recent regional restructuring of the Company as well as targeted workforce reductions to align capacity with expected market trends. The total cash outflow associated with the special charges is expected to be $10.4 million, while the noncash charges are $6.4 million.
On March 3, 2011 we announced that we had entered into a $209.4 million accelerated stock buyback with Goldman, Sachs & Co. During the three months ended June 30, 2011 we received and retired approximately 628,000 shares of our common stock under the 2011 ASB. At final settlement, we may be entitled to receive additional shares.
24
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Segment and Consolidated Operating Results:
Segment operating income
Unallocated corporate expenses
Total operating income
Reconciliation of Operating Income to Adjusted EBITDA:
Add back:
Depreciation and amortization
25
Reconciliation of Net Income and Earnings Per Share to Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Earnings Per Share:
Add back: Special charges, net of tax
Adjusted net income
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
Revenues and operating income
See “Segment Results” for an expanded discussion of segment revenues and operating income.
Unallocated corporate expenses increased $3.0 million, or 17.7%, to $20.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, from $17.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Excluding the impact of special charges of $2.8 million recorded in the three months ended June 30, 2011, unallocated corporate expenses increased $0.2 million, or 1.2% from the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase was primarily due to $2.0 million of higher performance-based compensation costs, largely offset by a $1.6 million increase in allocation of centrally managed costs in direct support of our operating segments.
Interest income and other, which includes foreign currency transaction gains and losses, increased by $3.1 million to $2.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from a net expense of $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase is primarily due to a $2.4 million favorable impact from net foreign currency transaction gains resulting from the remeasurement of receivables and payables required to be settled in a currency other than an entity’s functional currency.
Interest expense increased $3.1 million to $14.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $11.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase is due to additional senior debt from the issuance of $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6 3/4% senior notes due 2020 in the third quarter of 2010 and the loan notes issued as a portion of the consideration in connection with the acquisition in Asia which we completed in August 2010. This increase was partially offset by a $1.2 million favorable impact of lower interest rates as a result of interest rate swap agreements entered into in March 2011.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we recorded special charges of $16.8 million, of which $6.4 million was non-cash. The charges reflect actions we took to reduce executive management related overhead in connection with our recent restructuring on a global basis and to align our workforce with expected market trends. These actions included a reduction in workforce totaling 37 employees. The special charges consisted of:
26
The following table details the special charges by segment and the decrease in total headcount that resulted from the reduction in workforce during the three months ended June 30, 2011:
Our provision for income taxes in interim periods is computed by applying our estimated annual effective tax rate against income before income tax expense for the period. In addition, non-recurring or discrete items are recorded during the period in which they occur or become known. The effective tax rate was 31.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to 38.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2010. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, the effective tax rate was favorably impacted by lower provisions for foreign income taxes due to lower tax rates on undistributed earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries that we intend to reinvest indefinitely, and lower state income taxes due to the mix of earnings by jurisdiction. In addition, we recognized tax benefits in the three months ended June 30, 2011 for discrete items primarily related to the reversal of previously recognized deferred tax liabilities which are no longer required.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
Unallocated corporate expenses decreased $3.4 million, or 8.7%, to $35.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, from $38.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Excluding the impact of special charges of $2.8 million recorded in the three months ended June 30, 2011 and $5.1 million recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2010, unallocated corporate expenses decreased $1.1 million, or 3.4% from the six months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease was primarily due to a $3.3 million increase in allocation of centrally managed costs in direct support of our operating segments, partially offset by $2.2 million higher performance-based compensation costs.
Interest income and other, which includes foreign currency transaction gains and losses, increased by $2.7 million to $4.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $2.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase is primarily due to a $2.0 million favorable impact from net foreign currency transaction gains resulting from the remeasurement of receivables and payables required to be settled in a currency other than an entity’s functional currency.
27
Interest expense increased $7.1 million to $29.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $22.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase is due to additional senior debt from the issuance of $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6 3/4% senior notes due 2020 in the third quarter of 2010 and the loan notes issued as a portion of the consideration in connection with the acquisition in Asia which we completed in August 2010. This increase was partially offset by a $1.5 million favorable impact of lower interest rates as a result of interest rate swap agreements entered into in March 2011.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, we recorded special charges of $16.8 million and $30.2 million, respectively.
See the “Special charges” discussion above for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 for an expanded discussion of the special charges recorded in 2011.
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded special charges totaling $30.2 million, primarily related to a realignment of our workforce and a consolidation of four office locations, of which $8.9 million was non-cash. The charges reflected actions we took to better align capacity with expected demand, to eliminate certain redundancies resulting from acquisitions and to provide for appropriate levels of administrative support. The special charges consisted of:
$19.3 million of salary continuance and other contractual employee related costs associated with the reduction in workforce of 144 employees, including reserves against employee advances, costs related to loan forgiveness and accelerated vesting of share-based awards;
$7.8 million of expense associated with lease terminations related to the consolidation of four office locations; and
$3.1 million of accelerated amortization related to a software solution which will no longer be utilized by the Company.
The following table details the special charges by segment and the decrease in total headcount that resulted from the reduction in workforce during the six months ended June 30, 2010:
Our provision for income taxes in interim periods is computed by applying our estimated annual effective tax rate against income before income tax expense for the period. In addition, non-recurring or discrete items are recorded during the period in which they occur or become known. The effective tax rate was 35.4% for the
28
six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to 38.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the effective tax rate was favorably impacted by lower provisions for foreign income taxes due to lower tax rates on undistributed earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries that we intend to reinvest indefinitely, and lower state income taxes due to the mix of earnings by jurisdiction. In addition, we recognized tax benefits in the six months ended June 30, 2011 for discrete items primarily related to the reversal of previously recognized deferred tax liabilities which are no longer required.
SEGMENT RESULTS
Adjusted Segment EBITDA
The following table reconciles segment operating income to adjusted segment EBITDA for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
Other Segment Operating Data
Number of revenue-generating professionals (at period end):
Total revenue-generating professionals
Utilization rates of billable professionals:(1)
Forensic and Litigation Consulting(3)
Average billable rate per hour:(2)
We calculate the utilization rate for our billable professionals by dividing the number of hours that all of our billable professionals worked on client assignments during a period by the total available working hours for all of our billable professionals during the same period. Available hours are determined by the standard hours worked by each employee, adjusted for part-time hours, local country standard work weeks and local country holidays. Available working hours include vacation and professional training days, but exclude
29
For engagements where revenues are based on number of hours worked by our billable professionals, average billable rate per hour is calculated by dividing revenues for a period by the number of hours worked on client assignments during the same period. We have not presented an average billable rate per hour for our Technology and Strategic Communications segments as most of the revenues of these segments are not based on billable hours.
2010 utilization and average billable rate calculations were updated to include information related to non-domestic operations that was not available in 2010.
CORPORATE FINANCE/RESTRUCTURING
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Depreciation and amortization of intangible assets
Gross profit(1)
Gross profit margin(2)
Adjusted segment EBITDA as a percent of revenues
Number of revenue-generating professionals (at period end)
Utilization rates of billable professionals
Average billable rate per hour
Revenues less direct cost of revenues
Gross profit as a percent of revenues
Revenues decreased $9.2 million, or 8.3%, to $101.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $111.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 with approximately 1.0% growth from the estimated positive impact of foreign currency translation, primarily due to the strengthening of the British pound relative to the U.S. dollar. Revenue from the Asia practice acquired in the third quarter of 2010 was $6.4 million, or 5.7%. Organic revenue declined $16.6 million, or 15.0% due to fewer consulting hours and lower average billable rates per hour as the demand for bankruptcy and restructuring services in North America decreased, partially offset by higher healthcare services and European restructuring revenues.
30
Gross profit decreased $6.5 million, or 15.7%, to $34.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $41.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Gross profit margin decreased 3.0 percentage points to 34.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from 37.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The gross profit margin decline was primarily due to lower revenue from the higher margin bankruptcy and restructuring practices, partially offset by improvements in the segment’s healthcare services and from the acquired Asia practice.
SG&A expense increased by $2.8 million, or 17.3%, to $19.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $16.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. SG&A expense was 18.8% of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2011, up from 14.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in SG&A expense was primarily due to overhead related to the acquired Asia practice. Bad debt expense was 0.1% of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2011, unchanged from the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Amortization of other intangible assets decreased to $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $1.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Adjusted segment EBITDA decreased $8.7 million, or 33.4%, to $17.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $26.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Revenues decreased $19.4 million, or 8.5%, to $209.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $228.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 with 0.6% growth from the estimated positive impact of foreign currency translation, primarily due to the strengthening of the British pound and Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar. Revenue from the Asia practice acquired in the third quarter of 2010 was $13.2 million, or 5.8%. Organic revenue declined $34.0 million, or 14.9% due to fewer consulting hours and lower average billable rates per hour as the demand for bankruptcy and restructuring services decreased in North America and Europe, partially offset by higher healthcare services revenues.
Gross profit decreased $18.8 million, or 20.3%, to $73.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $92.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Gross profit margin decreased 5.2 percentage points to 35.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from 40.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The gross profit margin decline was primarily due to lower revenues from the higher margin bankruptcy and restructuring practices, partially offset by improvements in healthcare services and from the acquired Asia practice.
SG&A expense increased by $4.3 million, or 12.7%, to $38.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $33.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. SG&A expense was 18.3% of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2011, up from 14.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in SG&A expense was primarily due to overhead related to the acquired Asia practice. Bad debt expense was 0.1% of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2011, unchanged from the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Amortization of other intangible assets decreased to $2.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $3.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Adjusted segment EBITDA decreased $21.9 million, or 36.0%, to $38.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $60.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
31
FORENSIC AND LITIGATION CONSULTING
Utilization rates of billable professionals(3)
Average billable rate per hour(3)
2010 utilization and average billable rate calculations were updated to include information related to non-domestic operations that was not available in 2010
Revenues increased $12.6 million, or 15.6%, to $93.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $80.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 with 1.4% growth from the estimated positive impact foreign currency translation, which was primarily due to the strengthening of the British pound and Brazilian real relative to the U.S. dollar. Revenue from the practices acquired from the LECG Corporation in the first quarter of 2011 was $5.0 million, or 6.1%, primarily driven by the disputes and forensic accounting and environmental solution practices in North America. The organic revenue growth of $6.5 million, or 8.1%, was attributed to increases in both consulting hours and higher average billable rates per hour in North America from the construction practice and insurance and compliance-related engagements, while the Asia Pacific and Europe, Middle East and Africa regions benefited from growth in our construction, forensic accounting and litigation support services.
Gross profit increased $2.0 million, or 5.8%, to $35.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $33.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Gross profit margin decreased 3.5 percentage points to 37.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from 41.4% for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The gross profit margin decline was due to lower utilization in the North America and data analytics practices and increased headcount from investments in key practices which offset higher consulting volume and price increases.
SG&A expense increased $2.2 million, or 14.6%, to $17.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $14.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. SG&A expense was 18.3% of revenue for the
32
three months ended June 30, 2011, down from 18.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in SG&A expense was due to increased facilities and information technology support costs to support growing operations. Bad debt expense was 1.1% of revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011 unchanged from the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Amortization of other intangible assets decreased to $0.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease in amortization of other intangible assets was due primarily to the timing of certain acquired intangible assets becoming fully amortized in 2010.
Adjusted segment EBITDA decreased by $0.1 million, or 0.6%, to $19.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $19.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Revenues increased $16.8 million, or 10.6%, to $176.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $159.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 with 0.9% growth from the estimated positive impact foreign currency translation, which was primarily due to the strengthening of the British pound and Brazilian real relative to the U.S. dollar. Revenue from the practices acquired from LECG in the first quarter of 2011 was $6.0 million, or 3.8%, primarily driven by the disputes and forensic accounting and environmental solution practices in North America. The organic revenue growth of $9.5 million, or 5.9%, was attributed to increases in both consulting hours and higher average billable rates per hour in North America from the construction practice and insurance and compliance-related engagements, while the Asia Pacific and Europe, Middle East and Africa regions benefited from growth in our construction, forensic accounting and litigation support services. These improvements were partially offset by lower data analytics revenue due to fewer consulting hours despite higher average billable rates per hour pertaining to that practice.
Gross profit increased $1.3 million, or 2.0%, to $67.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $66.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Gross profit margin decreased 3.3 percentage points to 38.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from 41.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The gross profit margin decline was due to lower utilization and increased headcount from investments in key practices which offset higher consulting volume and price increases.
SG&A expense increased $4.5 million, or 15.8%, to $33.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $28.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. SG&A expense was 18.9% of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2011, up from 18.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in SG&A expense was due to increased facilities and information technology support costs to support growing operations. Bad debt expense was 1.1% of revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2011 unchanged from the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Amortization of other intangible assets decreased to $1.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease in amortization of other intangible assets was due primarily to the timing of certain acquired intangible assets becoming fully amortized in 2010.
Adjusted segment EBITDA decreased by $3.0 million, or 7.7%, to $36.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $39.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
33
ECONOMIC CONSULTING
Revenues increased by $29.9 million, or 46.4%, to $94.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $64.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 with 0.9% growth from the estimated positive impact of foreign currency translation, which was primarily due to the strengthening of the British pound relative to the U.S. dollar. Revenue from the competition policy, financial advisory, international arbitration, and airline competition practices acquired from LECG in the first quarter of 2011 was $18.0 million, or 27.9%. The organic revenue growth of $11.4 million, or 17.6%, was due to an increase in both consulting hours and average billable rates per hour in antitrust and M&A and the European international arbitration, regulatory and valuation practice compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010, as well as higher volumes in financial economics consulting.
Gross profit increased by $10.0 million, or 49.5%, to $30.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $20.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Gross profit margin increased to 31.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from 31.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in gross profit margin was attributed to more consulting hours and higher utilization with better staff leverage, partially offset by higher variable compensation costs relative to 2010.
SG&A expense increased by $2.5 million, or 26.2%, to $11.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $9.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. SG&A expense was 12.5% of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to 14.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in SG&A expense was due to overhead in the acquired practices. Bad debt expense was 1.7% of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to 1.8% of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
34
Amortization of other intangible assets was $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 unchanged from the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Adjusted segment EBITDA increased by $7.5 million, or 65.1%, to $18.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $11.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Revenues increased by $36.9 million, or 28.0%, to $168.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $131.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 with 0.5% growth from the estimated positive impact of foreign currency translation, which was primarily due to the strengthening of the British pound relative to the U.S. dollar. Revenue from the competition policy, financial advisory, international arbitration, and airline competition practices acquired from LECG in the first quarter of 2011 was $19.0 million, or 14.4%. The organic revenue growth of $17.2 million, or 13.0%, was due to an increase in both consulting hours and average billable rates per hour in antitrust and M&A and the European international arbitration, regulatory and valuation practice compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010, as well as higher volumes in financial economics consulting.
Gross profit increased by $10.3 million, or 24.1%, to $52.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $42.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Gross profit margin decreased to 31.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from 32.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The gross profit margin decline was primarily due to increased variable compensation costs compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010 despite higher utilization and more consulting hours.
SG&A expense increased by $3.0 million, or 15.7%, to $21.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $18.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. SG&A expense was 13.0% of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to 14.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in SG&A expense was due to overhead in the acquired practices. Bad debt expense was 1.5% of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to 1.9% of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Amortization of other intangible assets was $0.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 unchanged compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Adjusted segment EBITDA increased by $7.2 million, or 28.8%, to $32.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $25.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
35
TECHNOLOGY
Number of revenue-generating professionals (at period end)(3)
Includes personnel involved in direct client assistance and revenue-generating consultants
Revenues increased by $14.3 million, or 33.5%, to $57.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $42.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 with 0.7% growth from the estimated positive impact of foreign currency translation due to the strengthening of the British pound relative to the U.S. dollar. Organic revenue growth of $14.0 million, or 32.8% was due to increased revenues from our AcuityTM offering and higher product licensing revenues related to complex litigation and investigation engagements. Unit based revenues increased due to higher volumes while pricing was relatively stable on the combined mix of offerings.
Unit based revenue is defined as revenue billed on a per item, per page, or using some other unit based method and includes revenue from data processing and storage, software usage and software licensing. Unit based revenue includes revenue associated with our proprietary software that is made available to customers, either via a web browser (“on-demand”) or installed at our customer or partner locations (“on-premise”). On-demand revenue is charged on a unit or monthly basis and includes, but is not limited to, processing and review related functions. On-premise revenue is comprised of up-front license fees, with recurring support and maintenance.
Gross profit increased by $8.2 million, or 32.1%, to $33.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $25.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Gross profit margin decreased 0.7 percentage points to 59.4% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from 60.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The gross profit margin decline was due to a change in the mix of revenue with higher third party costs related to an increase in certain litigation engagements relative to the three months ended June 30, 2010.
36
SG&A expense increased by $3.1 million, or 24.2%, to $16.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $12.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. SG&A expense was 28.0% of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2011, down from 30.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in SG&A expense is primarily due to higher variable compensation and an increase in bad debt expense driven by fewer favorable collection resolutions on previously reserved items compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010. We had net recoveries of bad debt of $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to net recoveries of bad debt of $1.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Research and development expense in the second quarter of 2011 was $6.0 million, compared to $5.3 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Amortization of other intangible assets increased to $2.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $1.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Adjusted segment EBITDA increased $4.8 million, or 30.5%, to $20.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $15.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Revenues increased by $22.0 million, or 25.5%, to $108.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $86.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 with 0.4% growth from the estimated positive impact of foreign currency translation due to the strengthening of the British pound relative to the U.S. dollar. The organic growth of $21.7 million, or 25.1%, was due to increased revenues from our AcuityTM offering, higher unit based revenues and higher consulting revenues. Unit based revenues increased due to higher volumes partially offset by lower per unit pricing related to a change in the mix of offerings. Consulting revenues increased primarily due to higher volumes from certain litigation matters.
Gross profit increased by $10.6 million, or 19.3%, to $65.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $55.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Gross profit margin decreased 3.2 percentage points to 60.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from 64.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The gross profit margin decline was due to a change in the mix of revenue with higher margin unit based revenue comprising a smaller percentage of total revenue, coupled with higher third party costs related to an increase in certain litigation engagements relative to the six months ended June 30, 2010.
SG&A expense increased by $3.8 million, or 13.4%, to $31.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $28.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. SG&A expense was 29.5% of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2011, down from 32.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in SG&A expense is primarily due to higher variable compensation and an increase in bad debt expense driven by fewer favorable resolution or collections on previously reserved items compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. Bad debt expense was 0.3% of revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to net recoveries of bad debt of $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Research and development expense for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $11.8 million, compared to $10.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Amortization of other intangible assets increased to $4.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $3.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Adjusted segment EBITDA increased $6.2 million, or 18.7%, to $39.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $33.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
37
STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS
Revenues increased by $3.7 million, or 7.5%, to $53.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $49.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 with 7.2% growth from the estimated positive impact of foreign currency translation, which was primarily due to the strengthening of the British pound, Australian dollar and the Euro relative to the U.S. dollar. Organic revenue remained relatively flat with 0.3% growth as an increase in project volumes was mostly offset by competitive pricing pressure on retainer and project fees.
Gross profit decreased by $0.3 million, or 1.3%, to $19.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $19.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Gross profit margin decreased 3.1 percentage points to 35.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from 38.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The decline in gross profit margin was primarily due to higher personnel costs related to the retention of key employees.
SG&A expense increased by $1.8 million, or 15.9%, to $13.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $11.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. SG&A expense was 25.0% of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2011, up from 23.2% of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in SG&A expense was primarily related to the estimated negative impact of foreign currency translation, higher facilities costs and marketing expenses. Bad debt expense was 1.1% of revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to 1.2% of revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Amortization of other intangible assets decreased to $1.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $1.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Adjusted segment EBITDA decreased by $2.2 million, or 25.2%, to $6.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $8.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
38
Revenues increased by $6.9 million, or 7.4%, to $99.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $93.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 with 4.8% growth from the estimated positive impact of foreign currency translation, which was primarily due to the strengthening of the British pound, Australian dollar and the Euro relative to the U.S. dollar. Organic revenue grew 2.5% due to an increase in project volumes, partially offset by competitive pricing pressure on retainer and project fees.
Gross profit increased by $0.1 million, or 0.3%, to $35.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $35.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Gross profit margin decreased 2.5 percentage points to 36.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from 38.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The decline in gross profit margin was primarily due to higher personnel costs related to the retention of key employees.
SG&A expense increased by $2.5 million, or 10.7%, to $25.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $23.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. SG&A expense was 25.6% of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2011, up from 24.8% of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in SG&A expense was primarily related to increased facilities costs, the estimated negative impact of foreign currency translation, and marketing and travel-related expenses. Bad debt expense was 0.9% of revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to 1.2% of revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Amortization of other intangible assets decreased to $2.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $2.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Adjusted segment EBITDA decreased by $2.5 million, or 17.5%, to $11.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $14.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates from the information provided in Part II, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies” as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash flows
We have generally financed our day-to-day operations, capital expenditures and acquisition-related contingent payments through cash flows from operations. During the first quarter of our fiscal year, our cash needs generally exceed our cash flows from operations due to the payments of annual incentive compensation and acquisition-related contingent payment amounts. Our operating cash flows generally exceed our cash needs subsequent to the first quarter of each year.
Our operating assets and liabilities consist primarily of billed and unbilled accounts receivable, notes receivable from employees, accounts payable, accrued expenses and accrued compensation expense. The timing of billings and collections of receivables as well as payments for compensation arrangements affect the changes in these balances.
39
Net cash used in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $12.8 million as compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $22.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The decline was primarily a result of a shift in the relative mix of receivables towards clients and geographic regions that traditionally have longer billing and collection cycles, particularly related to revenue growth in our Economic Consulting business and our Asia region in general.
Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $64.0 million as compared to $19.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Payments for acquisitions of businesses were $50.9 million in the current year as compared to $22.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010. Payments for acquisitions for the six months ended June 30, 2011 included $25.7 million of payments, net of cash received related to the acquisition of practices from LECG in the first quarter of 2011 and payments for contingent consideration and purchase price adjustments related to prior year acquisitions of $25.2 million. Payments for acquisitions for the six months ended June 30, 2010 included an acquisition payment of $2.3 million related to an acquisition in Hong Kong in April of 2010 and payments for contingent consideration and purchase price adjustments related to prior year acquisitions of $20.5 million. Capital expenditures were $12.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $11.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Capital expenditures in the first six months of both 2011 and 2010 primarily related to leasehold improvements and the purchase of data processing equipment. In addition, the Company received $15.0 million from the sale of short-term investments in the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $209.5 million as compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $4.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Our financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 included $209.4 million in cash used to repurchase and retire 5.1 million shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the 2011 ASB.
Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2011, our capital resources included $98.7 million of cash and cash equivalents and available borrowing capacity of $247.2 million under a $250.0 million revolving line of credit under our senior secured bank credit facility (“bank credit facility”). As of June 30, 2011, we had no outstanding indebtedness under our bank credit facility, however, $2.8 million of outstanding letters of credit reduced the availability of borrowing under the bank credit facility. We use letters of credit primarily in lieu of security deposits for our leased office facilities.
Future Cash Needs
We anticipate that our future cash needs will principally consist of funds required for:
operating and general corporate expenses relating to the operation of our businesses;
capital expenditures, primarily for information technology equipment, office furniture and leasehold improvements;
debt service requirements;
funds required to compensate designated senior managing directors under our senior managing director incentive compensation programs;
potential contingent consideration obligations and stock floor price guarantees related to our acquisitions; and
potential acquisitions of businesses that would allow us to diversify or expand our businesses.
We currently anticipate aggregate capital expenditures will range between $27 million to $35 million to support our organization during the remainder of 2011, including direct support for specific client engagements. Our estimate takes into consideration the needs of our existing businesses but does not include the impact of
40
expenditures related to future acquisitions or specific client engagements that are not currently contemplated. Our capital expenditure requirements may change if our staffing levels or technology needs change significantly from what we currently anticipate, if we purchase additional equipment specifically to support a client engagement or if we pursue and complete additional acquisitions.
In certain business combinations consummated prior to January 1, 2009, a portion of our purchase price is in the form of contingent consideration, often referred to as earn-outs. The use of contingent consideration allows us to shift some of the valuation risk, inherent at the time of acquisition, to the sellers based upon the outcome of future financial targets that the sellers contemplate in the valuations of the companies, assets or businesses they sell. Contingent consideration is payable annually as agreed upon performance targets are met and is generally subject to a maximum amount within a specified time period. Our obligations change from period-to-period primarily as a result of payments made during the current period, changes in the acquired entities’ performance and changes in foreign currency exchange rates. In addition, certain acquisition-related restricted stock agreements contain stock price guarantees that may result in cash payments in the future if our share price falls below a specified per share market value on the date the applicable stock restrictions lapse.
In connection with our required adoption of the new accounting principles for business combinations, contingent consideration included in business combinations consummated subsequent to December 31, 2008 are recorded as liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet and re-measured to fair value at each subsequent reporting date with an offset to current period earnings. Contingent consideration accounted for under the new accounting principles for business combinations are $23.8 million at June 30, 2011.
Holders of our 3 3/4% senior subordinated convertible notes (“Convertible Notes”) may convert them only under certain circumstances, including certain stock price related conversion contingencies. Upon conversion, the principal portion of the Convertible Notes will be paid in cash and any excess of the “conversion value” over the principal portion of the Convertible Notes will be paid either in cash, shares of our common stock or a combination of cash and shares of our common stock at our option. The “conversion value” of each note is the average closing price of our shares over the “conversion reference period,” as defined in the Indenture, multiplied by the initial conversion rate of 31.998 shares of our common stock for each $1,000 principal amount of the Convertible Notes, subject to adjustment upon specified events.
When the Convertible Notes are convertible at the option of the holder, they are classified as current on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. When the Convertible Notes are not convertible at the option of the holder, and the scheduled maturity is not within one year after the balance sheet date, they are classified as long-term. As of June 30, 2011, the Convertible Notes are classified as long-term given that the per share price of our common stock did not close above the conversion threshold for 20 days in the 30 consecutive trading day period ended April 14, 2011. As of July 15, 2011, the Convertible Notes did not meet the conversion threshold and, therefore, the notes will remain non-convertible and classified as long-term through July 16, 2011, when the Convertible Notes will be less than a year from maturity and classified as short-term.
Upon surrendering any Convertible Note for conversion, in accordance with the Indenture, the holder of such note shall receive cash in the amount of the lesser of (i) the $1,000 principal amount of such note or (ii) the “conversion value” of the note as defined in the Indenture. The conversion feature results in a premium over the face amount of the notes equal to the difference between our stock price as determined by the calculation set forth in the Indenture and the conversion price of $31.25 times the conversion ratio of 31.998 shares of our common stock for each $1,000 principal amount of the notes. We retain our option to satisfy any conversion value in excess of each $1,000 principal amount of the Convertible Notes with shares of common stock, cash or a
41
combination of both cash and shares. The premium will be calculated using the stock price calculation defined in the Indenture. Assuming conversion of the full $149.9 million principal amount of the Convertible Notes, for every $1.00 the market price of our common stock exceeds $31.25 per share, we will be required, at our option, either to pay an additional $4.8 million or to issue shares of our common stock with a then market price equivalent to $4.8 million, or a combination of cash and shares with a value of $4.8 million, to settle the conversion feature.
The Convertible Notes are registered securities. As of June 29, 2011, the date of the last trade prior to June 30, 2011, the Convertible Notes had a market price of $1,263 per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes, compared to an estimated conversion value of approximately $1,204 per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes. Because the Convertible Notes have historically traded at market prices above the estimated conversion values, we do not anticipate holders will elect to convert their Convertible Notes in the near future, if convertible, unless the value ratio should change. However, we believe we have adequate capital resources to fund potential conversions.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements other than operating leases and we have not entered into any transactions involving special purpose entities.
Future Contractual Obligations
There have been no significant changes in our future contractual obligations since December 31, 2010.
Future Outlook
We believe that our anticipated operating cash flows and our total liquidity, consisting of our cash on hand and $247.2 million of availability under our bank credit facility are sufficient to fund our capital and liquidity needs for at least the next twelve months. In making this assessment, we have considered:
our $98.7 million of cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2011;
funds required for debt service payments, including interest payments on our long-term debt;
funds required for capital expenditures during the remainder of 2011 of about $27 million to $35 million;
funds required to satisfy potential contingent payments and other obligations in relation to our acquisitions;
funds required to compensate designated senior managing directors and other key professionals by issuing unsecured forgivable employee loans;
the funds required to satisfy conversion of the Convertible Notes; and
other known future contractual obligations.
For the last several years, our cash flows from operations have exceeded our cash needs for capital expenditures and debt service requirements. We believe that our cash flows from operations, supplemented by short-term borrowings under our bank credit facility, as necessary, will provide adequate cash to fund our long-term cash needs from normal operations.
Our conclusion that we will be able to fund our cash requirements by using existing capital resources and cash generated from operations does not take into account the impact of any future acquisition transactions, any unexpected changes in significant numbers of employees or other expenditures that are not currently contemplated. The anticipated cash needs of our businesses could change significantly if we pursue and complete
42
additional business acquisitions, if our business plans change, if economic conditions change from those currently prevailing or from those now reasonably anticipated, or if other unexpected circumstances arise that have a material effect on the cash flow or profitability of our business. Any of these events or circumstances, including any new business opportunities, could involve significant additional funding needs in excess of the identified currently available sources and could require us to raise additional debt or equity funding to meet those needs. Our ability to raise additional capital, if necessary, is subject to a variety of factors that we cannot predict with certainty, including:
our future profitability;
the quality of our accounts receivable;
our relative levels of debt and equity;
the volatility and overall condition of the capital markets; and
the market prices of our securities.
Any new debt funding, if available, may be on terms less favorable to us than our bank credit facility or the Indentures that govern our senior notes. See “Forward Looking Statements.”
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements include statements concerning our plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events, future revenues, future results and performance, future capital expenditures, expectations, plans or intentions relating to acquisitions and other matters, business trends and other information that is not historical and may appear under the headings “Part 1—Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the SEC on February 25, 2011, including the risks set forth under “Risks Related to Our Business Segments” and “Risks Related to Our Operations,” and the other documents we file with the SEC. When used in this quarterly report, words such as estimates, expects, anticipates, projects,plans, intends, believes, or forecasts and variations of such words or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, management’s examination of historical operating trends, are based upon our historical performance and our current plans, estimates and expectations at the time we make them and various assumptions. Our expectations, beliefs, estimates and projections are expressed in good faith and we believe there is a reasonable basis for them. There can be no assurance that management’s expectations, beliefs, estimates and projections will result or be achieved. Our actual financial results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, any forward-looking statements. The inclusion of any forward-looking information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the future plans, estimates or expectations contemplated by us will be achieved. Given these risks, uncertainties and other factors, you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.
There are a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in, or implied by, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements we make in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, include the following:
changes in demand for our services or products or the mix of services or products that we provide to clients;
our ability to attract and retain qualified professionals and senior management;
conflicts resulting in our inability to represent certain clients;
our former employees joining competing businesses;
our ability to manage our professionals’ utilization and billing rates and maintain or increase the pricing of our services and products;
43
our ability to make acquisitions and integrate the operations of acquisitions as well as the costs of integration;
our ability to adapt to and manage the risks associated with operating in non-U.S. markets;
our ability to replace senior managers and practice leaders who have highly specialized skills and experience;
our ability to identify suitable acquisition candidates, negotiate advantageous terms and take advantage of opportunistic acquisition situations;
periodic fluctuations in revenues, operating income and cash flows;
damage to our reputation as a result of claims involving the quality of our services;
legislation or judicial rulings regarding data privacy and the discovery process;
fee discounting or renegotiation, lower pricing, less advantageous contract terms and unexpected terminations of client engagements;
competition;
general economic factors, industry trends, restructuring and bankruptcy rates, capital market conditions, merger and acquisition activity, major litigation activity and other events outside of our control, which could impact each of our business segments differently;
our ability to manage growth;
risk of non-payment of receivables;
our outstanding indebtedness; and
proposed changes in accounting principles.
There may be other factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf apply only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements included herein. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances and do not intend to do so.
For information regarding our exposure to certain market risks see “Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. There have been no significant changes in our market risk exposure since December 31, 2010, except as noted below.
Equity Price Sensitivity
Certain acquisition-related restricted stock agreements contain stock price guarantees that may result in cash payments in the future if our share price falls below a specified per share market value on the date the applicable stock restrictions lapse (“the determination date”). The future settlement of any contingency related to our common stock price would require a cash outflow. The following table details by year the cash outflows that would result from the remaining stock price guarantee payments if, on the applicable determination dates, our common stock price was at, 20% above or 20% below our closing common stock price on June 30, 2011 of $37.94 per share.
Cash outflow, assuming:
Closing share price of $37.94 at June 30, 2011
20% increase in share price
20% decrease in share price
44
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q was made under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (a) were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is timely recorded, processed, summarized and reported and (b) included, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
45
From time to time in the ordinary course of business, we are subject to claims, asserted or unasserted, or named as a party to lawsuits or investigations. Litigation, in general, and intellectual property and securities litigation in particular, can be expensive and disruptive to normal business operations. Moreover, the results of legal proceedings cannot be predicted with any certainty and in the case of more complex legal proceedings such as intellectual property and securities litigation, the results are difficult to predict at all. We are not aware of any asserted or unasserted legal proceedings or claims that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of our operations.
There have been no material changes in any risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on February 25, 2011. We may disclose changes to risk factors or disclose additional factors from time to time in our future filings with the SEC. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations.
Unregistered sales of equity securities.
None
Repurchases of our common stock. The following table provides information with respect to purchases we made of our common stock during the second quarter ended June 30, 2011 (in thousands, except per share amounts).
April 1 through April 30, 2011
May 1 through May 31, 2011
June 1 through June 30, 2011
Represents 4,169 shares of common stock withheld to cover payroll tax withholdings related to the lapse of restrictions on restricted stock.
Represents 627,887 shares purchased as part of the 2011 ASB (as defined in footnote (4) below) and 9,496 shares of common stock withheld to cover payroll tax withholdings related to the lapse of restrictions on restricted stock.
Represents 2,129 shares of common stock withheld to cover payroll tax withholdings related to the lapse of restrictions on restricted stock.
In November 2009, our Board of Directors authorized a two-year stock repurchase program of up to $500.0 million (the “Repurchase Program”) and terminated the $50.0 million stock repurchase program authorized in February 2009. As of December 31, 2010, a balance of $209.4 million remained available under the Repurchase Program to fund stock repurchases by the Company.
46
On March 2, 2011, we entered into a supplemental confirmation with Goldman Sachs for a $209.4 million accelerated stock buyback (the “2011 ASB”), pursuant to the collared stock buyback master confirmation agreement dated November 9, 2009 between FTI Consulting and Goldman, Sachs & Co. On March 7, 2011, 4,433,671 shares of FTI Consulting common stock were repurchased pursuant to the 2011 ASB. On May 17, 2011, FTI Consulting received an additional 627,887 shares bringing the total shares delivered in 2011 to 5,061,558 shares of FTI Consulting common stock. The specific number of shares that ultimately will be repurchased in the 2011 ASB will be based generally on the volume-weighted average share price of our common stock during the term of the repurchase agreement, subject to provisions that establish minimum and maximum number of shares. The 2011 ASB contemplates that final settlement may occur in December 2011, although under certain circumstances, at Goldman Sachs’ discretion, the completion date may be accelerated. At settlement, we may be entitled to receive additional shares of our common stock from Goldman Sachs. The 2011 ASB completes the Repurchase Program.
None.
As reported on our current report on Form 8-K dated June 1, 2011, which was filed with the SEC on June 2, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company amended and restated the Company’s Bylaws effective June 1, 2011 to, among other items, change the advance notice requirements for stockholders to nominate candidates for director or to propose business (other than pursuant to Rule 14a-8) at annual meetings. Pursuant to those amendments, if a stockholder wants to present a proposal (other than pursuant to Rule 14a-8) or nominate candidates for director, a stockholder must deliver notice of the proposal or the nominee to the Secretary of the Company, including the information required by our Bylaws, not less than 120 days and no more than 150 days prior to the first anniversary of the mailing date of the notice for the preceding year’s annual meeting, provided, however, that in the event that the date of the annual meeting is advanced or delayed by more than 30 days from the first anniversary date of the preceding year’s annual meeting, notice by the stockholder must be delivered not earlier than the 150th day prior to such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the 120th day prior to such annual meeting or the tenth day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such annual meeting is first made. For our annual meeting in 2012, we must receive stockholder proposals and nominations no earlier than November 20, 2011 and no later than December 20, 2011. If any stockholder proposal is received before November 20, 2011 or after December 20, 2011, it will be considered untimely, and we will not be required to present it at the 2012 annual meeting if submitted outside the processes of Rule 14a-8.
47
(a) Exhibits
ExhibitNumber
Exhibit Description
48
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: August 5, 2011
Senior Vice President, Controller and
Chief Accounting Officer
49