SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
Commission file number 1-13252
McKESSON CORPORATION
(415) 983-8300(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer. Yes x No o
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS(In millions, except per share amounts)(Unaudited)
See Financial Notes
3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS(In millions, except per share amounts)(Unaudited)
4
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS(In millions)(Unaudited)
5
1. Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation. The condensed consolidated financial statements of McKesson Corporation (“McKesson,” the “Company,” or “we” and other similar pronouns) include the financial statements of all majority-owned or controlled companies. Significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. In our opinion, these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position as of June 30, 2004, and the results of operations and cash flows for the quarters ended June 30, 2004 and 2003.
The results of operations for the quarters ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual audited financial statements, accounting policies and financial notes included in our 2004 consolidated financial statements previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). As described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2004, we reorganized our businesses on April 1, 2004. This reorganization resulted in changes to our reporting segments. On April 29 and 30, 2004, we provided financial information about this reorganization, as it relates to prior periods, in a Form 8-K. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
The Company’s fiscal year begins on April 1 and ends on March 31. Unless otherwise noted, all references to a particular year shall mean the Company’s fiscal year.
New Accounting Pronouncements. In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” which addresses financial accounting requirements for retirement obligations associated with tangible long-lived assets. In May 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements 4, 44, 64, Amendment to FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections as of April 2002.” SFAS No. 145 amends other existing authoritative pronouncements to make various technical corrections, clarify meanings, or describe their applicability under changed conditions. SFAS Nos. 143 and 145 became effective for 2004. The adoption of these standards did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” and in December 2003, a revised interpretation was issued (FIN No. 46(R)). In general, a variable interest entity (“VIE”) is a corporation, partnership, trust, or any other legal structure used for business purposes that either does not have equity investors with voting rights or has equity investors that do not provide sufficient financial resources for the entity to support its activities. FIN No. 46 requires a VIE to be consolidated by a company if that company is designated as the primary beneficiary. The interpretation applies to VIEs created after January 31, 2003, and for all financial statements issued after December 15, 2003 for VIEs in which an enterprise held a variable interest that it acquired before February 1, 2003.
We implemented FIN Nos. 46 and 46(R) on a retroactive basis as required in 2004. As a result of the implementation, the Company no longer consolidates its investment in the McKesson Financing Trust (the “Trust”) as the Company was not designated as the Trust’s primary beneficiary. In accordance with this accounting standard, the Company now recognizes the debentures issued to the Trust as long-term debt in its consolidated financial statements in lieu of the preferred securities that the Trust issued to third parties. Additionally, the consolidated financial statements include interest expense on the debentures and no longer report dividends on the preferred securities, net of tax. These changes increased the Company’s net debt to net capital employed ratio slightly but did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements, including diluted earnings per share.
In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” SFAS No. 149 amends SFAS No. 133 for decisions made as part of the FASB’s Derivatives Implementation Group process, other FASB projects dealing with financial instruments, and in connection with implementation issues raised in relation to the application of the definition of a derivative. This statement is generally effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003 and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.” SFAS No. 150 clarifies the definition of a liability as currently
6
McKESSON CORPORATIONFINANCIAL NOTES (Continued)(Unaudited)
defined in FASB Concepts Statement No. 6, “Elements of Financial Statements,” as well as other planned revisions. This statement requires a financial instrument that embodies an obligation of an issuer to be classified as a liability. In addition, the statement establishes standards for the initial and subsequent measurement of these financial instruments and disclosure requirements. SFAS No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and for all other matters, at the beginning of our second quarter 2004. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2003, the Staff of the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 104, “Revenue Recognition,” which supersedes SAB No. 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements.” SAB No. 104’s primary purpose is to rescind the accounting guidance contained in SAB No. 101 related to multiple-element revenue arrangements that was superseded as a result of the issuance of Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 00-21. Additionally, SAB No. 104 rescinds the SEC’s related Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements Frequently Asked Questions and Answers issued with SAB No. 101 that had previously been codified by the SEC. While the wording of SAB No. 104 reflects the issuance of EITF Issue No. 00-21, the revenue recognition principles of SAB No. 101 remain largely unchanged by the issuance of SAB No. 104, which was effective upon issuance. The adoption of SAB No. 104 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In January 2004, the FASB issued Financial Staff Position (“FSP”) 106-1, “Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003.” As permitted by FSP No. 106-1, we elected to defer recognizing the effects of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the “Act”) until authoritative guidance on accounting for the new federal subsidy is issued. In May 2004, the FASB issued FSP No. 106-2 which provides accounting guidance for this new subsidy. The Company sponsors a number of postretirement benefit plans which may benefit from the subsidy and as a result, we are currently evaluating the impact of FSP No. 106-2, which we are required to adopt in our second quarter of 2005.
Employee Stock-Based Compensation. We account for our employee stock-based compensation plans using the intrinsic value method under Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” We apply the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” as amended by SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure.” Had compensation cost for our employee stock-based compensation been recognized based on the fair value method, consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, net income and earnings per share would have been as follows:
SFAS No. 123 compensation expense, as indicated in the above table, decreased in the first quarter of 2005 compared to the same period a year ago. The decrease is primarily attributable to accelerated vesting of substantially all unvested stock options outstanding during the fourth quarter of 2004. SFAS No. 123 compensation expense is typically amortized over the related vesting period; as a result, these fully vested stock options did not have an impact on the expense during the current quarter. Partially offsetting this decrease, during the first quarter of 2005, we granted 6.0 million stock options that vest on or before March 31, 2005 and have a seven year term. Historically, options granted by the Company generally vest over four years and have a ten year term.
7
2. Acquisitions and Divestiture
On April 1, 2004, we acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of Moore Medical Corp. (“MMC”), of New Britain, Connecticut, for an aggregate cash purchase price of approximately $37 million. MMC is an Internet-enabled, multi-channel marketer and distributor of medical-surgical and pharmaceutical products to non-hospital provider settings. Approximately $24 million of the purchase price has been assigned to goodwill, none of which is deductible for tax purposes. The results of MMC’s operations have been included in the condensed consolidated financial statements within our Medical-Surgical Solutions segment since the acquisition date.
We also completed several smaller acquisitions in 2004 within our Medical-Surgical Solutions and Provider Technologies segments. Pro forma results of operations for our business acquisitions have not been presented because the effects were not material to the condensed consolidated financial statements on either an individual or aggregate basis.
During the first quarter of 2005, we sold a business for net cash proceeds of $12.3 million. The disposition resulted in a pre-tax loss of $1.1 million and an after-tax loss of $4.6 million. Financial results for this business were included in our Pharmaceutical Solutions segment and were not material to our condensed consolidated financial statements.
3. Restructuring Activities
Net charges from restructuring activities for the first quarter of 2005 and 2004 were $0.6 million and $1.3 million. These charges primarily related to a number of smaller initiatives offset in part by a reversal of prior years’ restructuring reserves due to a change in estimated costs to complete these activities.
The following table summarizes restructuring activities for the quarter ended June 30, 2004:
Accrued restructuring liabilities are included in other liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. In connection with the acquisition of MMC, we recorded $4.0 million of restructuring reserves related to employee termination costs. These costs have been recognized as liabilities assumed in the purchase price of MMC.
In addition to the above restructuring activities, we are still managing a 2001/2000 restructuring plan associated with customer settlements for the discontinuance of overlapping and nonstrategic products and other product development projects within our Provider Technologies segment. Customer settlement allowances, which are included as a reduction of accounts receivable in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets, were reduced by $0.4 million in non-cash settlements during the first quarter of 2005 to $5.8 million at June 30, 2004 from $6.2 million at March 31, 2004. Total cash and non-cash settlements of $45.3 million and $95.4 million have been incurred since the inception of this restructuring plan. Non-cash settlements represent write-offs of customer receivables. There have been no significant offsetting changes in estimates that increased the provision for customer settlements. At March 31, 2004, we substantially completed our negotiations with the affected customers. As a result, we do not anticipate additional significant increases to the allowance for customer settlements. However, as settlement negotiations with the remaining customers are finalized, additional adjustments to the reserve may be necessary.
8
4. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted earnings per share is computed similarly except that it reflects the potential dilution that could occur if dilutive securities or other obligations to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.
The computations for basic and diluted earnings per share are as follows:
Approximately 34 million and 43 million stock options were excluded from the computations of diluted net earnings per share for the quarters ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 as their exercise price was higher than the Company’s average stock price.
5. Goodwill and Other Intangibles
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, are as follows:
9
Information regarding other intangibles is as follows:
Amortization expense of other intangibles was $6.2 million and $4.6 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. The weighted average remaining amortization periods for customer lists, technology and trademarks and other intangible assets at June 30, 2004 were: 8 years, 4 years and 5 years. Estimated future annual amortization expense of these assets is as follows: $16.5 million, $14.9 million, $15.1 million, $15.7 million and $6.1 million for 2005 through 2009, and $9.1 million thereafter. At June 30, 2004, there was $15.0 million of other intangibles not subject to amortization.
6. Financing Activity
In June 2004, we renewed our committed accounts receivable sales facility under substantially similar terms to those previously in place with the exception that the facility was increased by $300.0 million to $1.4 billion. The renewed facility expires in June 2005. At June 30, 2004, there were no amounts utilized under this facility.
7. Convertible Junior Subordinated Debentures
In February 1997, we issued 5% Convertible Junior Subordinated Debentures (the “Debentures”) in an aggregate principal amount of $206,186,000. The Debentures, which are included in long-term debt, mature on June 1, 2027, bear interest at an annual rate of 5%, payable quarterly, and are currently redeemable by us at 101.5% of the principal amount. The Debentures were purchased by the Trust, which is wholly owned by the Company, with proceeds from its issuance of four million shares of preferred securities to the public and 123,720 common securities to us. These preferred securities are convertible at the holder’s option into the Company’s common stock. The Debentures represent the sole assets of the Trust.
Holders of the preferred securities are entitled to cumulative cash distributions at an annual rate of 5% of the liquidation amount of $50 per security. Each preferred security is convertible at the rate of 1.3418 shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. The preferred securities will be redeemed upon repayment of the Debentures and are callable by us on or after March 4, 2000, in whole or in part, initially at 103.5% of the liquidation preference per share, and thereafter at prices declining at 0.5% per annum to 100% of the liquidation preference on and after March 4, 2007 plus, in each case, accumulated, accrued and unpaid distributions, if any, to the redemption date.
We have guaranteed, on a subordinated basis, distributions and other payments due on the preferred securities (the “Guarantee”). The Guarantee, when taken together with our obligations under the Debentures, and in the indenture pursuant to which the Debentures were issued, and our obligations under the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust governing the Trust, provides a full and unconditional guarantee of amounts due on the preferred securities.
10
8. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
The following table provides the components of the net periodic expense for the Company’s defined benefit pension and postretirement plans:
In April 2004, we made several lump sum payments totaling approximately $42 million from an unfunded U.S. pension plan. In accordance with SFAS No. 88, “Employers’ Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits”, approximately $12 million in settlement charges associated with these payments were expensed in the first quarter of 2005. Substantially all of this expense was recorded in the Corporate segment.
9. Stockholders’ Equity
Comprehensive income is as follows:
10. Financial Guarantees and Warranties
Financial Guarantees
We have agreements with certain of our customers’ financial institutions under which we have guaranteed the repurchase of inventory (primarily for our Canadian businesses), at a discount, in the event these customers are unable to meet certain obligations to those financial institutions. Among other limitations, these inventories must be in resalable condition. We have also guaranteed loans, credit facilities and the payment of leases for some customers; and we are a secured lender for substantially all of these guarantees. During the first quarter of 2005, we converted a $40.0 million credit facility guarantee in favor of a customer (that recently emerged from bankruptcy) to a note receivable due from this customer. This secured note bears interest and is repayable in various payments through 2007. Customer guarantees range from one to ten years and were primarily provided to facilitate financing for certain strategic customers. At June 30, 2004, the maximum amounts of inventory repurchase guarantees and other customer guarantees were approximately $155 million and $15 million of which a nominal amount has been accrued.
At June 30, 2004, we had commitments of $11.0 million, primarily consisting of the purchase of services from our equity-held investments, for which no amounts had been accrued.
11
In addition, our banks and insurance companies have issued $85.2 million of standby letters of credit and surety bonds on our behalf in order to meet the security requirements for statutory licenses and permits, court and fiduciary obligations, and our workers’ compensation and automotive liability programs.
Our software license agreements generally include certain provisions for indemnifying customers against liabilities if our software products infringe a third party’s intellectual property rights. To date, we have not incurred any material costs as a result of such indemnification agreements and have not accrued any liabilities related to such obligations.
In conjunction with certain transactions, primarily divestitures, we may provide routine indemnification agreements (such as retention of previously existing environmental, tax and employee liabilities) whose terms vary in duration and often are not explicitly defined. Where appropriate, obligations for such indemnifications are recorded as liabilities. Because the amounts of these indemnification obligations often are not explicitly stated, the overall maximum amount of these commitments cannot be reasonably estimated. Other than obligations recorded as liabilities at the time of divestiture, we have historically not made significant payments as a result of these indemnification provisions.
Warranties
In the normal course of business, we provide certain warranties and indemnification protection for our products and services. For example, we provide warranties that the pharmaceutical and medical-surgical products we distribute are in compliance with the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and other applicable laws and regulations. We have received the same warranties from our suppliers, who customarily are the manufacturers of the products. In addition, we have indemnity obligations to our customers for these products, which have also been provided to us from our suppliers, either through express agreement or by operation of law.
We also provide warranties regarding the performance of software and automation products we sell. Our liability under these warranties is to bring the product into compliance with previously agreed upon specifications. For software products, this may result in additional project costs which are reflected in our estimates used for the percentage-of-completion method of accounting for software installation services within these contracts. In addition, most of our customers who purchase our software and automation products also purchase annual maintenance agreements. Revenue from these maintenance agreements is recognized on a straight-line basis over the contract period and the cost of servicing product warranties is charged to expense when claims become estimable. Accrued warranty costs were not material to the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
11. Other Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
In our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2004, we reported on numerous legal proceedings including those arising out of our announcement on April 28, 1999, regarding accounting improprieties at HBO & Company, now known as McKesson Information Solutions LLC (the “Accounting Litigation”), and other litigation and contingencies. Since the date of that report the only significant developments were as follows:
I. Accounting Litigation
On April 7, 2004, in the previously reported action captioned The State of Oregon Public Employees Retirement Board v. McKesson HBOC, Inc. et al. (Master File No. 307619), the Honorable Donald S. Mitchell in the California Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco sustained plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss the Company’s cross-claims for “unjust enrichment.”
On April 26, 2004, in the previously reported action captioned In re McKesson HBOC, Inc. Securities Litigation, (N.D. Cal. Case No. C-99-20743-RMW) (the “Consolidated Action”), plaintiff Theodore H. Pacha filed a request to be named Lead Plaintiff of a subclass of shareholders who primarily held McKesson Corporation common shares before the merger. The court has not ruled on this motion, or on Lead Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification, which was heard on March 12, 2004.
We do not believe it is feasible to predict or determine the outcome or resolution of the Accounting Litigation, or to estimate the amounts of, or potential range of, loss with respect to those proceedings. In addition, the timing of the final resolution of these proceedings is uncertain. The range of possible resolutions of these proceedings could include judgments against the Company or settlements that could require substantial payments by the Company, which could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
II. Other Litigation
As previously reported, a judgment has been entered against the Company in an action brought in the California Superior Court by a former employee for wrongful termination, disability discrimination and harassment, Charlene Roby vs. McKesson HBOC, Inc. et al. (Action No. CV01-573), consisting of compensatory and punitive damages
12
awards of $3.5 million and $15.0 million, respectively. After post-trial motions, the trial court reduced the compensatory damages portion of the judgment to $2.8 million but left the punitive damages award unchanged. The Company will seek reversal, or alternatively reduction, of all elements of this judgment through an appeal. If this appeal is not successful, this judgement could have an adverse impact on our consolidated financial statements.
III. Contingency
As discussed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2004, in 2002, we entered into a $500 million, ten year contract with the National Health Services Information Authority (“NHS”), an organization of the British government charged with the responsibility of delivering healthcare in England and Wales. The contract engages the Company to develop, implement and operate a human resources and payroll system at more than 600 NHS locations. To date, there have been delays to this contract which have caused increased costs and a decrease in the amount of time in which we can earn revenues. These delays have adversely impacted the contract's projected profitability and no material revenue has yet been recognized on this contract. As of June 30, 2004, our consolidated balance sheet includes an investment of approximately $78 million in net assets, consisting of prepaid expenses, software and capital assets, net of cash received, related to this contract. While we believe it is likely that we can deliver and operate an acceptable system and recover our investment in this contract, we are currently negotiating with the NHS to amend certain key terms and conditions in the contract, and there is no certainty we will agree on an updated implementation plan. We expect this negotiation to be completed in the second half of calendar year 2004. However, the timing and the outcome of these negotiations is uncertain and failure to reach agreement on an updated implementation plan and amend certain key contract terms and conditions, and/or further delays in the implementation may result in losses that could be material. Even if we agree on amended contract terms and conditions and an updated implementation plan, it is possible that the terms of that agreement may result in the impairment of our net assets related to the contract as well as substantial penalties and charges, which could have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial statements.
12. Segment Information
In April 2004, we reconfigured our operating segments to better align product development and selling efforts with the evolving needs of the healthcare market. As a result, commencing in the first quarter of 2005, we are reporting the following three operating segments: Pharmaceutical Solutions, Medical-Surgical Solutions and Provider Technologies. Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2005 segment presentation. We evaluate the performance of our operating segments based on operating profit before interest expense, income taxes and results from discontinued operations. Our Corporate segment includes expenses associated with Corporate functions and projects and certain employee benefits. Corporate expenses are allocated to the operating segments to the extent that these items can be directly attributable to the segment.
The Pharmaceutical Solutions segment distributes ethical and proprietary drugs and health and beauty care products throughout North America. This segment also manufactures and sells automated pharmaceutical dispensing systems for retail pharmacies, medical management and pharmaceutical solutions for biotech and pharmaceutical manufacturers, patient and payor services, and consulting and outsourcing services to pharmacies. We have added the Clinical Auditing and Compliance business, which was previously included in our former Information Solutions segment, to this segment’s expanded payor services business. This business sells software to payors for auditing professional claims.
The Medical-Surgical Solutions segment distributes medical-surgical supplies and equipment and provides logistics and related services within the United States. This segment now includes Zee Medical, which was formerly included in our Pharmaceutical Solutions segment. Zee Medical provides first aid and safety products and training services to corporate customers. The operating results of this segment for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 also reflect the impact of the acquisition of MMC.
The Provider Technologies segment consists of the former Information Solutions segment plus the McKesson Inpatient Automation business, which was previously included in our Pharmaceutical Solutions segment, and the Corporate Solutions group, which was previously managed by our Corporate group. This segment continues to deliver enterprise-wide patient care, clinical, financial, supply chain, managed care and strategic management software solutions as well as outsourcing and other services to healthcare organizations throughout North America, the United Kingdom and Europe. McKesson Inpatient Automation provides automation and robotics for the hospital market, and the Corporate Solutions group continues to be responsible for the sales coordination of complex provider engagements that include strategic product and service solutions from multiple business units. Expenses
13
McKESSON CORPORATIONFINANCIAL NOTES (Concluded)(Unaudited)
incurred by Corporate Solutions on behalf of other business segments are allocated to the applicable business segments.
Financial information relating to our segments is as follows:
During the first quarter of 2005, we received $41.2 million as our share of a settlement of an antitrust class action lawsuit involving a drug manufacturer. This settlement was recorded as a credit in cost of sales within our Pharmaceutical Solutions segment in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Corporate expenses for 2005 include pension settlement charges as discussed in Financial Note 8. Corporate expenses for 2004 include an $8.5 million gain on the sale of a surplus property.
14
McKESSON CORPORATIONFINANCIAL REVIEW(Unaudited)
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition
Financial Overview
Revenues for the first quarter of 2005 grew by 16% to $19.2 billion from $16.5 billion for the first quarter of 2004. Net income increased 5% to $163.6 million in the first quarter of 2005 compared to the same period a year ago and diluted earnings per share increased 4% to $0.55. Increases in net income and diluted earnings per share primarily reflect revenue and operating profit growth in our Pharmaceutical Solutions and Provider Technologies segments, offset in part by additional Corporate expenses.
Results of Operations
Revenues:
Revenues for the first quarter of 2005 grew by 16% to $19.2 billion compared to the first quarter of 2004. The growth in revenue was primarily due to our Pharmaceutical Solutions segment, which accounted for over 94% of our consolidated revenues.
Increases in U.S. Healthcare pharmaceutical direct distribution and services revenues for the first quarter of 2005 primarily reflect market growth rates as well as new institutional customers in our pharmaceutical distribution business. Market growth rates reflect growing drug utilization and price increases, which are offset in part by the increased use of lower priced generics. In May 2004, we began implementation on a new pharmaceutical distribution contract with the Department of Veterans Affairs, which contributed to the segment’s total increase in revenues. Annual revenues on this contract are expected to exceed $3.5 billion. U.S. Healthcare sales to customers’ warehouses also increased in the first quarter of 2005 primarily as a result of several expanded agreements with existing customers and growth from existing customers.
Canadian pharmaceutical revenues increased in the first quarter of 2005 reflecting market growth rates, new business from manufacturers who formerly engaged in direct distribution activities and to a lesser extent, favorable foreign exchange rates. On a constant currency basis, revenues from our Canadian operations would have increased approximately 17% compared to the same period a year ago.
15
McKESSON CORPORATIONFINANCIAL REVIEW (Continued)(Unaudited)
Medical-Surgical Solutions segment distribution revenues were flat in the first quarter of 2005. Increases in our primary care sector, including revenues derived from our recent acquisition of Moore Medical Corporation (“MMC”), were fully offset by a decline in revenues in the acute care sector due to the transition of the loss of the segment’s largest customer. On April 1, 2004, we acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of MMC, of New Britain, Connecticut, for an aggregate cash purchase price of approximately $37 million. MMC is an Internet-enabled, multi-channel marketer and distributor of medical-surgical and pharmaceutical products to non-hospital provider settings.
Provider Technologies segment revenues increased in the first quarter of 2005 primarily from increased demand for our clinical application offerings and to a lesser extent, from our Automation products.
Gross Profit:
Gross profit increased 8% to $852.0 million in the first quarter of 2005. As a percentage of revenues, gross profit margins declined 32 basis points in 2005. Declines in our gross profit margins primarily reflect a higher proportion of our revenue being attributable to our Pharmaceutical Solutions segment, which has lower margins relative to our other segments and which had a decline in margins compared to the same period a year ago. Gross profit margins increased in our Medical-Surgical Solutions segment and decreased in our Provider Technologies segment primarily due to product mix.
During the first quarter of 2005, gross margin for our Pharmaceutical Solutions segment was impacted by:
16
Operating Expenses and Other Income:
Operating expenses increased 11% to $591.2 million in the first quarter of 2005. As a percentage of revenues, operating expenses decreased 16 basis points in 2005. Increases in operating expense dollars were primarily due to additional costs to support our sales volume growth, approximately $12 million of settlement charges pertaining to a non-qualified pension plan and additional legal costs associated with our pending securities litigation. In addition, operating expenses for the first quarter of 2004 benefited from an $8.5 million gain on the sale of a surplus property. As a percentage of revenues, operating expenses decreased primarily due to the leveraging of our fixed cost infrastructure and productivity improvements in back-office and field operations within our Pharmaceutical Solutions segment. Other income increased in the first quarter of 2005 primarily due to higher interest income.
Segment Operating Profit and Corporate Expenses:
Operating profit as a percentage of revenues decreased in our Pharmaceutical Solutions segment in the first quarter of 2005 primarily reflecting a decline in gross margins, offset in part by favorable leveraging of the segment’s fixed cost infrastructure and productivity improvements in back-office and field operations.
Medical-Surgical Solutions segment’s operating profit as a percentage of revenues increased in the first quarter of 2005 primarily reflecting improvements in gross profit margin which was offset in part by an increase in
17
operating expenses. Operating expenses increased in both dollars as well as a percentage of revenues primarily due to the acquisition of MMC as well as from additional costs incurred to serve the segment’s alternate site customers. During the second quarter of 2005, the segment anticipates completing an evaluation of its distribution center network as a result of its MMC acquisition. In accordance with accounting standards, certain costs that will be incurred to consolidate operations with acquired businesses will be treated as part of the cost of the acquisition whereas other related costs will be expensed.
Provider Technologies segment’s operating profit as a percentage of revenues increased in the first quarter of 2005 primarily reflecting a decrease in gross profit margin which was more than offset by a lower ratio of operating expenses as a percentage of sales. Despite an increase in revenues, operating expense dollars for the quarter were flat compared to the same period a year ago primarily reflecting the segment’s control of expenses. In addition, operating expenses for the first quarter of 2004 included incremental product development expenses.
Corporate expenses increased in the first quarter of 2005 primarily reflecting settlement charges of approximately $12 million pertaining to a non-qualified pension plan and additional legal costs associated with our pending securities litigation. These expenses were partially offset by higher interest income. During the first quarter of 2005, we made several lump sum cash payments totaling approximately $42 million from an unfunded U.S. pension plan. In accordance with accounting standards, additional charges for settlements associated with lump sum payments of pension obligations are expensed in the period in which the payments are made. Accordingly, expenses for the quarter include charges associated with these payments. In addition, expenses for the comparable prior year period benefited from an $8.5 million gain pertaining to the sale of a surplus property.
Interest Expense: Interest expense approximated that of the prior comparable period as the benefit of lower average borrowings were almost fully offset by increases in our effective interest rate.
Income Taxes: The Company’s effective income tax rate was 33.5% and 33.4% for the quarters ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. During the first quarter of 2005, we sold a business for a pre-tax loss of $1.1 million and an after-tax loss of $4.6 million. Partially offsetting the tax impact of this disposition, we recorded a net benefit relating to favorable tax settlements and adjustments.
Weighted Average Diluted Shares Outstanding: Diluted earnings per share was calculated based on an average number of shares outstanding of 300.1 million and 298.1 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2004 and 2003.
Financial Condition, Liquidity, and Capital Resources
Operating activities provided cash flow of $128.3 million and $40.8 million during the first quarters of 2005 and 2004. Net cash flow for 2005 includes an incremental non-cash add back of $68.2 million in deferred income taxes partially offset by an increase in net taxes paid of $53.9 million. Net uses of cash for working capital approximated that of the first quarter of last year as additional working capital required to support our revenue growth and an increase in investment inventory were offset by favorable working capital management. Additionally, our new customer, the Department of Veterans Affairs, has prompt payment terms. Operating activities for 2005 also includes approximately $42 million of lump sum pension settlement payments.
Investing activities utilized cash of $96.8 million and $63.4 million during the first quarters of 2005 and 2004. The increased usage in 2005 primarily reflects a payment of approximately $37 million for the acquisition of MMC, as well as greater issuances of notes receivable. During the first quarter of 2005, we converted a $40.0 million credit facility guarantee in favor of a customer (that recently emerged from bankruptcy) to a note receivable due from this customer. These increases in cash usage were partially offset by the receipt of $21.0 million from the sale of notes receivable and a decrease in expenditures for capitalized software.
Financing activities provided cash of $97.2 million and used cash of $54.2 million in the first quarters of 2005 and 2004. Financing activities for 2005 include $23.4 million of short-term borrowings and an incremental $48.3 million from common stock issuances primarily resulting from an increase in employees’ exercises of stock options. 2004 financing activities included the use of $75.3 million for stock repurchases.
18
Selected Measures of Liquidity and Capital Resources
Working capital primarily includes receivables and inventories, net of drafts and accounts payable and deferred revenue. Our Pharmaceutical Solutions segment requires a substantial investment in working capital that is susceptible to large variations during the year as a result of inventory purchase patterns and seasonal demands. Inventory purchase activity is a function of sales activity, new customer build-up requirements and the desired level of investment inventory. Consolidated working capital has increased primarily as a result of our higher sales volume, as well as an increase in cash and cash equivalents.
We reduced our ratio of net debt to net capital employed as growth in our operating income was in excess of the growth in working capital and other investments needed to fund increases in revenue.
Credit Resources
We fund our working capital requirements primarily with cash, short-term borrowings and our receivables sale facility. We have a $650.0 million 364-day revolving credit agreement that expires in September 2004 and a $550.0 million three-year revolving credit facility that expires in September 2005. These facilities are primarily intended to support our commercial paper borrowings. We also have a $1.4 billion accounts receivable sales facility, which was renewed in June 2004, the terms of which are substantially similar to those previously in place with the exception that the facility was increased by $300.0 million. No amounts were utilized under any of these facilities at June 30, 2004.
Our various borrowing facilities and long-term debt are subject to certain covenants. Our principal debt covenant is our debt to capital ratio, which cannot exceed 56.5%. If we exceed this ratio, repayment of debt outstanding under the revolving credit facility and $335.0 million of term debt could be accelerated. At June 30, 2004, this ratio was 21.6% and we were in compliance with our other financial covenants. A reduction in our credit ratings or the lack of compliance with our covenants could negatively impact our ability to finance operations through our credit facilities, or issue additional debt at the interest rates then currently available.
Funds necessary for future debt maturities and our other cash requirements are expected to be met by existing cash balances, cash flows from operations, existing credit sources and other capital market transactions.
New Accounting Pronouncements
There are a number of new accounting pronouncements that may impact our financial results. These new accounting pronouncements are described in Financial Note 1, “Significant Accounting Policies,” to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
19
McKESSON CORPORATIONFINANCIAL REVIEW (Concluded)(Unaudited)
FACTORS AFFECTING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
In addition to historical information, management’s discussion and analysis includes certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Some of the forward-looking statements can be identified by use of forward-looking words such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “seeks,” “approximates,” “intends,” “plans,” or “estimates,” or the negative of these words, or other comparable terminology. The discussion of financial trends, strategy, plans or intentions may also include forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Although it is not possible to predict or identify all such risks and uncertainties, they may include, but are not limited to, the following factors. The readers should not consider this list to be a complete statement of all potential risks and uncertainties.
These and other risks and uncertainties are described herein or in our Forms 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K and other public documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after this date or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We believe there has been no material change in our exposure to risks associated with fluctuations in interest and foreign currency exchange rates discussed in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective based on their evaluation of these controls and procedures required by paragraph (b) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
20
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
See Financial Note 11, “Other Commitments and Contingent Liabilities,” of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contained in Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Item 2. Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The Company made no share repurchases during the first quarter of 2005. The dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under our share repurchase program is approximately $209 million.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
The following report on Form 8-K was filed during the three months ended June 30, 2004:
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
21