UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-Q
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
(888) 772-7326
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES x NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, INC.
INDEX
2
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
4
5
1. Organization and Business:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (“PRA”) was formed March 20, 1996. Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (“PRA Inc”) was formed in August 2002. On November 8, 2002, PRA Inc completed its initial public offering (“IPO”) of common stock. As a result, all of the membership units and warrants of PRA were exchanged on a one to one basis for warrants and shares of a single class of common stock of PRA Inc. PRA Inc now owns all outstanding membership units of PRA and PRA Receivables Management, LLC (d/b/a Anchor Receivables Management) (“Anchor”). PRA Inc, a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) purchases, collects and manages portfolios of defaulted consumer receivables. The defaulted consumer receivables the Company collects are either purchased from the sellers of finance receivables or are collected on behalf of clients on a commission fee basis. This is primarily accomplished by maintaining a staff of highly skilled collectors whose purpose is to contact the customers and arrange payment of the debt. Secondarily, the Company has contracted with independent attorneys with which the Company can undertake legal action in order to satisfy the outstanding debt.
The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of PRA Inc, PRA, PRA Holding I, and Anchor.
The accompanying unaudited financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and, therefore, do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In the opinion of the Company, however, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the Company’s financial position as of June 30, 2004, its results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, and its cash flows for the six month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The results of operations of the Company for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 may not be indicative of future results. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, filed for the year ended December 31, 2003.
2. Finance Receivables:
The Company accounts for its investment in finance receivables using the interest method under the guidance of Practice Bulletin 6, “Amortization of Discounts on Certain Acquired Loans.” Static pools of relatively homogenous accounts are established. Once a static pool is established, the receivable accounts in the pool are not changed. Each static pool is recorded at cost which includes certain direct costs of acquisition paid to third parties, and is accounted for as a single unit for the recognition of income, principal payments and loss provision. Income on finance receivables is accrued monthly based on each static pool’s effective interest rate. This interest rate is estimated based on the timing and amount of anticipated cash flows using the Company’s proprietary collection models. Monthly cash flows greater than the interest accrual will reduce the carrying value of the static pool. Likewise, monthly cash flows that are less than the monthly accrual will accrete the carrying balance. Each pool is reviewed monthly and compared to the Company’s models to drive complete amortization of the carrying balance at the end of each pool’s life. The cost recovery method prescribed by Practice Bulletin 6 is used when collections on a particular portfolio cannot be reasonably predicted. Under the cost recovery method, no revenue is recognized until the Company has fully collected the cost of the portfolio. Additionally, a pool can become fully amortized (zero carrying balance on the Statement of Financial Position) while still generating cash collections. In this case, all cash collections are recognized as revenue when received
In the event that anticipated cash collections would be inadequate to amortize the carrying balance, an impairment charge would be taken with a corresponding write-off of the receivable balance. Accordingly, the Company does not maintain an allowance for credit losses.
6
PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, INC.NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(unaudited)
The Company capitalizes certain fees paid to the third parties related to the direct acquisition of a portfolio of accounts. These fees are added to the acquisition cost of the portfolio and accordingly are amortized over the life of the portfolio using the interest method. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, the Company capitalized $258,376 and $334,014 of these direct acquisition fees. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, the Company capitalized $582,214 and $812,557 of these direct acquisition fees. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, the Company amortized $291,930 and $570,405 of these direct acquisition fees. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, the Company amortized $285,313 and $554,709 of these direct acquisition fees. The balance of the unamortized capitalized fees at June 30, 2004 and 2003 was $1,035,153 and $1,279,284, respectively.
At June 30, 2004 the Company wrote-off $530,580 related to the capitalization of fees paid to third parties for address correction and other customer data associated with the acquisition of portfolios purchased over the past 5 years. As a result of a review of the company’s accounting, the company determined these capitalized acquisition fees should be expensed.
The agreements to purchase the aforementioned receivables include general representations and warranties from the sellers covering account holder death or bankruptcy, and accounts settled or disputed prior to sale. The representation and warranty period permitting the return of these accounts from the Company to the seller is typically 90 to 180 days. Any funds received from the seller of finance receivables as a return of purchase price are referred to as buybacks. Buyback funds are simply applied against the finance receivable balance received. They are not included in the Company’s cash collections from operations nor are they included in the Company’s cash collections applied to principal amount.
Gains on sale of finance receivables, representing the difference between the sales price and the unamortized value of the finance receivables sold, are recognized when finance receivables are sold.
The Company applies a financial components approach that focuses on control when accounting and reporting for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities. Under that approach, after a transfer of financial assets, an entity recognizes the financial and servicing assets it controls and the liabilities it has incurred, eliminates financial assets when control has been surrendered, and eliminates liabilities when extinguished. This approach provides consistent standards for distinguishing transfers of financial assets that are sales from transfers that are secured borrowings. Importantly, these funds derived from sales are not included in our cash collections from finance receivables figure. They are reported separately under FASB Statement No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities.”
Changes in finance receivables for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 were as follows:
At the time of acquisition, the life of each pool is generally set at between 60 and 84 months based upon the proprietary models of the Company. As of June 30, 2004 the Company has $96,270,285 in finance receivables included in the Statement of Financial Position. Based upon current projections, cash collections applied to principal will be as follows for the twelve months in the periods ending:
7
3. Revolving Lines of Credit:
The Company maintains a $25.0 million revolving line of credit pursuant to an agreement entered into on November 28, 2003. The credit facility bears interest at a spread over LIBOR and extends through November 28, 2004. The agreement calls for:
This facility had no amounts outstanding at June 30, 2004. As of June 30, 2004 the Company is in compliance with all of the covenants of this agreement.
4. Property and Equipment:
Property and equipment, at cost, consist of the following as of the dates indicated:
5. Stock-Based Compensation:
The Company has a stock option and restricted share plan. The Amended and Restated Portfolio Recovery 2002 Stock Option Plan and 2004 Restricted Stock Plan were approved by the Company’s shareholders at its Annual Meeting of Shareholders on May 12, 2004, enabling the Company to issue to its employees and directors restricted shares of stock, as well as stock options. Also, in connection with the reorganization of the Company’s initial public offering, all existing PRA warrants that were owned by certain individuals and entities were exchanged for an equal number of PRA Inc warrants. Prior to 2002, the Company accounted for stock compensation issued under the
8
recognition and measurement provisions of APB Opinion No. 25 (“APB 25”), “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related Interpretations.
Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123 (“SFAS 123”), “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” prospectively to all employee awards granted, modified, or settled after January 1, 2002. All stock-based compensation measured under the provisions of APB 25 became fully vested during 2002. All stock-based compensation expense recognized thereafter was derived from stock-based compensation based on the fair value method prescribed in SFAS 123.
Stock Warrants
The PRA management committee was authorized to issue warrants to partners, employees or vendors to purchase membership units. Generally, warrants granted had a term between 5 and 7 years and vested within 3 years. Warrants had been issued at or above the fair market value on the date of grant. Warrants vest and expire according to terms established at the grant date. All outstanding warrants were issued to employees of the Company and are fully vested. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, no warrants were issued.
The following summarizes all warrant related transactions from December 31, 2001 through June 30, 2004:
The following information is as of June 30, 2004:
9
Had compensation cost for granted warrants been determined pursuant to SFAS 123, the Company’s net income prior to 2003 would have decreased. Using a fair-value (minimum value calculation), the following assumptions were used:
The fair value model utilizes the risk-free interest rate at grant with an expected exercise date sometime in the future generally assuming an exercise date in the first half of 2005. In addition, warrant valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected exercise date and risk-free interest rates. Prior to the IPO, the Company’s warrants had characteristics significantly different from those of traded warrants, and changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate. Based upon the above assumptions, the weighted average fair value of employee warrants granted during the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 was $1.24 and $0.35, respectively.
Stock Options
The Company created the 2002 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) on November 7, 2002. The Plan was amended in 2004 to enable the Company to issue restricted shares of stock to its employees and directors. The Plan, as amended (the “Amended Plan”) was approved by the Company’s shareholders at its Annual Meeting on May 12, 2004. Up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock may be issued under the Amended Plan. The Amended Plan expires November 7, 2012. All options and restricted shares issued under the Plan vest ratably over 5 years. Granted options expire seven years from grant date. Expiration dates range between November 7, 2009 and January 16, 2011. Options granted to a single person cannot exceed 200,000 in a single year. As of June 30, 2004, 895,000 options have been granted under the Plan, of which 54,755 have been cancelled.
Options are expensed under SFAS 123 and are included in operating expenses as a component of compensation. The Company issued 0 and 20,000 options to non-employee directors during the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively. All of the stock options which have been issued under the Plan were issued to employees of the Company except for 40,000 which were issued to non-employee directors.
The following summarizes all option related transactions from December 31, 2001 through June 30, 2004:
10
The Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the value of the stock options when granted. This model was developed to estimate the fair value of traded options, which have different characteristics than employee stock options. In addition, changes to the subjective input assumptions can result in materially different fair market value estimates. Therefore, the Black-Scholes model may not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of employee stock options.
Utilizing these assumptions, each employee stock option granted in 2002 is valued at $2.71 per share and each director stock option granted in 2002 is valued at $3.37 per share. For stock options issued to employees in 2003, the per share values range between $5.80 and $6.25. Each director stock option granted in 2004 is valued between $2.62 and $2.92.
Restricted Stock
Restricted stock shares are permitted to be issued as an incentive to attract new employees and, effective commensurate with the meeting of shareholders held on May 12, 2004, are permitted to be issued to directors and existing employees. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, the Company issued 0 and 5,000 shares of restricted stock as inducements to individuals becoming employed by the Company. The terms of the restricted share awards are similar to those of the stock option awards, wherein the shares are issued at or above market values and vest ratably over 5 years. Restricted stock is expensed over its vesting period. The Company has issued 18,045 restricted stock shares as of June 30, 2004, none of which have vested. On July 20, 2004, the board of directors voted to allow the issuance of up to 55,200 shares of restricted stock to approximately 240 employees. Mssrs. Fredrickson, Stevenson, and Grube received no shares.
6. Commitments and Contingencies:
Employment Agreements:
The Company has employment agreements with all of its executive officers and with several members of its senior management group, the terms of which expire on March 31, 2005, December 31, 2005 or December 31, 2006. Such agreements provide for base salary payments as well as bonuses which are based on the attainment of specific
11
management goals. Estimated remaining compensation under these agreements is approximately $2,699,981. The agreements also contain confidentiality and non-compete provisions.
Leases:
The Company is party to various operating and capital leases with respect to its facilities and equipment. Please refer to the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for discussion of these leases.
Litigation:
The Company is from time to time subject to routine litigation incidental to its business. The Company believes that the results of any pending legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.
12
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Cautionary Statements Pursuant to Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995:
This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that, if they never materialize or prove incorrect, could cause the results of the Company to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements, including statements regarding overall trends, gross margin trends, operating cost trends, liquidity and capital needs and other statements of expectations, beliefs, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends, and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. The risks, uncertainties and assumptions referred to above may include the following:
13
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain operating data as a percentage of total revenue for the periods indicated:
The Company uses the following terminology throughout its reports. “Cash Receipts” refers to all collections of cash, regardless of the source. “Cash Collections” refers to collections on the Company’s owned portfolios only, exclusive of commission income and sales of finance receivables. “Cash Sales of Finance Receivables” refers to the sales of the Company’s owned portfolios. “Commissions” refers to fee income generated from the Company’s wholly-owned contingent fee subsidiary.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 Compared To Three Months Ended June 30, 2003
Revenue
Total revenue was $28.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $6.7 million or 31.3% compared to total revenue of $21.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003.
Income Recognized on Finance Receivables
Income recognized on finance receivables was $26.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $6.3 million or 30.6% compared to income recognized on finance receivables of $20.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003. The majority of the increase was due to an increase in the Company’s cash collections on its owned defaulted consumer receivables to $38.4 million from $29.6 million, an increase of 29.7%. The Company’s amortization rate on owned portfolio for the three months ended June 30, 2004 was 29.9% while for the three months ended June 30, 2003 it was 30.3%. During the three months ended June 30, 2004, the Company acquired defaulted consumer receivables portfolios with an aggregate face value amount of $1.5 billion at a cost of $12.9 million. During the three months ended June 30, 2003, the Company acquired defaulted consumer receivable portfolios with an aggregate face value of $698.3 million at a cost of $20.8 million. The Company’s relative cost basis of acquiring defaulted consumer receivable portfolios decreased from 2.98% of face value for the three months ended June 30, 2003 to 0.86% of face value for the three months ended June 30, 2004. In any period, the Company acquires defaulted consumer receivables that can vary dramatically in their age, type and ultimate collectibility. The Company may pay significantly different purchase rates for purchased receivables within any period as a result of this quality fluctuation. As a result, the average purchase rate paid for any given period can fluctuate dramatically
14
based on the Company’s particular buying activity in that period. During the three months ended June 30, 2004, the Company bought a higher concentration of older, lower priced portfolios which resulted in a lower purchase price when compared to the three months ended June 30, 2003. However, regardless of the average purchase price, the Company intends to target a similar internal rate of return in pricing its portfolio acquisitions, therefore, the absolute rate paid is not necessarily relevant to estimated profitability of a period’s buying.
Commissions
Commissions were $1.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $515,000 or 65.6% compared to commissions of $785,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2003. Commissions increased as a result of a growing inventory of accounts.
Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses were $17.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $4.3 million or 33.6% compared to total operating expenses of $12.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003. Total operating expenses, including compensation and employee services expenses, were 43.0% of cash receipts excluding sales for the three months ended June 30, 2004 compared with 42.1% for the same period in 2003.
Compensation and Employee Services
Compensation and employee services expenses were $9.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $1.5 million or 19.5% compared to compensation and employee services expenses of $7.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003. Compensation and employee services expenses increased as total employees grew to 851 at June 30, 2004 from 719 at June 30, 2003. Compensation and employee services expenses as a percentage of cash receipts excluding sales decreased to 23.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2004 from 25.3% of cash receipts excluding sales for the same period in 2003.
Outside Legal and Other Fees and Services
Outside legal and other fees and services expenses were $5.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $2.2 million or 66.7% compared to outside legal and other fees and services expenses of $3.3 million for the three months ended June, 2003. Approximately $1.7 million of the increase was attributable to the increased cash collections resulting from the increased number of accounts referred to independent contingent fee attorneys. This increase is consistent with the growth the Company experienced in its portfolio of defaulted consumer receivables, and a portfolio management strategy shift implemented in mid 2002. This strategy resulted in the Company referring to the legal suit process more previously unsuccessfully liquidated accounts that have an identified means of repayment but that are nearing their legal statute of limitations, than had been referred historically. Legal cash collections represented 28.9% of total cash collections for the three months ended June 30, 2004, up from 24.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2003. Total legal expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2004 were 33.1% of legal cash collections compared to 33.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2003. Legal fees and costs increased from $2.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 to $3.8 million, or 52.0%, for the three months ended June 30, 2004. In addition, $531,000 was expensed during the three months ended June 30, 2004 related to the capitalization of fees paid to third parties for address correction and other customer data associated with the acquisition of portfolios purchased over the past 5 years. As a result of a review of the company’s accounting, the company determined these capitalized acquisition fees should be expensed.
Communications
Communications expenses were $811,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $144,000 or 21.6% compared to communications expenses of $667,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2003. The increase was attributable to growth in mailings and higher telephone expenses incurred to collect on a greater number of defaulted consumer receivables owned and serviced. Mailings were responsible for 88.8% of this increase, while the remaining 11.2% is attributable to higher telephone expenses.
15
Rent Occupancy
Rent and occupancy expenses were $433,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $123,000 or 39.7% compared to rent and occupancy expenses of $310,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2003. The increase was attributable to increased leased space at the Company’s new Norfolk, VA location which accounted for $110,000 of the increase. The remaining increase was attributable to increased utility charges resulting from the increased space in Norfolk.
Other Operating Expenses
Other operating expenses were $689,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $233,000 or 51.1% compared to other operating expenses of $456,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2003. The increase was due to increases in repairs and maintenance, insurance expenses, travel and meals and miscellaneous expenses. Repairs and maintenance expenses increased by $41,000, insurance expenses increased by $125,000, travel and meals increased by $25,000 and miscellaneous expenses increased by $42,000.
Depreciation
Depreciation expenses were $463,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $92,000 or 24.8% compared to depreciation expenses of $371,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2003. The increase was attributable to continued capital expenditures on equipment, software and computers related to the Company’s growth and systems upgrades.
Interest Income
Interest income was $25,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $17,000 compared to interest income of $8,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2003. This increase is the result of an increase in the average invested amount in auction rate certificates from $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 to $10.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $68,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004, a decrease of $15,000 or 18.1% compared to interest expense of $83,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2003. The decrease is due to a lower unused line fee under the new revolving credit arrangement.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 Compared To Six Months Ended June 30, 2003
Total revenue was $53.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $13.7 million or 34.5% compared to total revenue of $39.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003.
Income recognized on finance receivables was $50.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $12.6 million or 33.0% compared to income recognized on finance receivables of $38.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. The majority of the increase was due to an increase in the Company’s cash collections on its owned defaulted consumer receivables to $73.9 million from $55.9 million, an increase of 32.2%. The Company’s amortization rate on owned portfolio for the six months ended June 30, 2004 was 31.3% while for the six months ended June 30, 2003 it was 30.1%. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Company acquired defaulted consumer receivables portfolios with an aggregate face value amount of $2.10 billion at a cost of $27.9 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2003, the Company acquired defaulted consumer receivable portfolios with an aggregate face value of $1.53 billion at a cost of $38.5 million. The Company’s relative cost basis of acquiring defaulted consumer receivable portfolios decreased from 2.52% of face value for the six months ended June 30, 2003 to 1.33% of face value for the six months ended June 30, 2004. In any period, the Company acquires
16
defaulted consumer receivables that can vary dramatically in their age, type and ultimate collectibility. The Company may pay significantly different purchase rates for purchased receivables within any period as a result of this quality fluctuation. As a result, the average purchase rate paid for any given period can fluctuate dramatically based on the Company’s particular buying activity in that period. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Company bought a higher concentration of older, lower priced portfolios which resulted in a lower purchase price when compared to the six months ended June 30, 2003. However, regardless of the average purchase price, the Company intends to target a similar internal rate of return in pricing its portfolio acquisitions, therefore, the absolute rate paid is not necessarily relevant to estimated profitability of a period’s buying.
Commissions were $2.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $1.1 million or 73.3% compared to commissions of $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. Commissions increased as a result of a growing inventory of accounts.
Total operating expenses were $32.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $8.8 million or 37.3% compared to total operating expenses of $23.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. Total operating expenses, including compensation and employee services expenses, were 42.4% of cash receipts excluding sales for the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared with 41.1% for the same period in 2003.
Compensation and employee services expenses were $17.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $3.6 million or 25.5% compared to compensation and employee services expenses of $14.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. Compensation and employee services expenses increased as total employees grew to 851 at June 30, 2004 from 719 at June 30, 2003. Compensation and employee services expenses as a percentage of cash receipts excluding sales decreased to 23.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2004 from 24.6% of cash receipts excluding sales for the same period in 2003.
Outside legal and other fees and services expenses were $9.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $3.6 million or 59.0% compared to outside legal and other fees and services expenses of $6.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. Approximately $3.1 million of the increase was attributable to the increased cash collections resulting from the increased number of accounts referred to independent contingent fee attorneys. This increase is consistent with the growth the Company experienced in its portfolio of defaulted consumer receivables, and a portfolio management strategy shift implemented in mid 2002. This strategy resulted in the Company referring to the legal suit process previously unsuccessfully liquidated accounts that have an identified means of repayment but that are nearing their legal statute of limitations. Legal cash collections represented 27.7% of total cash collections for the six months ended June 30, 2004, up from 23.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2003. Total legal expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2004 were 33.7% of legal cash collections compared to 33.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2003. Legal fees and costs increased from $4.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 to $7.1 million, or 54.3%, for the six months ended June 30, 2004. In addition, $531,000 was expensed during the six months ended June 30, 2004 related to the capitalization of fees paid to third parties for address correction and other customer data associated with the acquisition of portfolios purchased over the past 5 years. As a result of a review of the company’s accounting, the company determined these capitalized acquisition fees should be expensed.
Communications expenses were $1.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $482,000 or 37.1% compared to communications expenses of $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. The increase was attributable to growth in mailings and higher telephone expenses incurred to collect on a greater number of defaulted consumer receivables owned and serviced. Mailings were responsible for 88.5% of this increase, while the
17
remaining 11.5% is attributable to higher telephone expenses.
Rent and Occupancy
Rent and occupancy expenses were $862,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $307,000 or 55.3% compared to rent and occupancy expenses of $555,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2003. The increase was attributable to increased leased space due to the opening of a call center in Hampton, Virginia in March 2003 and at the Company’s new Norfolk, VA location which opened in January 2004. The new Hampton call center accounted for $59,000 of the increase and the new Norfolk location accounted for $220,000 of the increase. The remaining increase was attributable to increased utility charges resulting from the increased space in Norfolk and Hampton.
Other operating expenses were $1.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $451,000 or 48.5% compared to other operating expenses of $929,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2003. The increase was due to changes in taxes, fees and licenses, travel and meals, repairs and maintenance, insurance and miscellaneous expenses. Taxes, fees and licenses increased by $20,000, travel and meals increased by $19,000, repairs and maintenance expenses increased by $81,000, insurance expenses increased by $257,000 and miscellaneous expenses increased by $74,000.
Depreciation expenses were $910,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $239,000 or 35.6% compared to depreciation expenses of $671,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2003. The increase was attributable to continued capital expenditures on equipment, software and computers related to the Company’s growth and systems upgrades.
Interest income was $29,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $1,000 compared to interest income of $28,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2003. These amounts are the result of investing in tax-exempt auction rate certificates in 2004 and 2003.
Interest expense was $137,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004, a decrease of $21,000 or 13.2% compared to interest expense of $159,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2003. The decrease is due to a lower unused line fee under the new revolving credit arrangement.
18
Supplemental Performance Data
Owned Portfolio Performance:
The following table shows the Company’s portfolio buying activity by year, setting forth, among other things, the purchase price, actual cash collections and estimated remaining cash collections as of June 30, 2004.
($ in thousands)
When the Company acquires a portfolio of defaulted accounts, it generally does so with a forecast of future total estimated collections to purchase price paid of no more than 2.6 times. Only after the portfolio has established probable and estimable performance in excess of that projection will estimated remaining collections be increased. If actual cash collections are less than the original forecast, the Company moves aggressively to lower estimated remaining collections to appropriate levels.
19
The following graph shows the Company’s purchase price in its owned portfolios by year beginning in 1996 and includes the year to date acquisition amount as of June 30, 2004. This purchase price number represents the cash paid to the seller to acquire defaulted consumer receivables, plus certain capitalized costs , less the purchase price refunded by the seller due to the return of non-compliant accounts.
The Company utilizes a long-term approach to collecting its owned pools of receivables. This approach has historically caused the Company to realize significant cash collections and revenues from purchased pools of finance receivables years after they are originally acquired. As a result, the Company has in the past been able to reduce its level of current period acquisitions without a corresponding negative current period impact on cash collections and revenue.
The following table, which excludes any proceeds from cash sales of finance receivables, demonstrates the Company’s ability to realize significant multi-year cash collection streams on its owned pools as of June 30, 2004:
Cash Collections By Year, By Year of Purchase
20
When the Company acquires a new pool of finance receivables, a 60 — 84 month projection of cash collections is created. The following chart shows the Company’s historical cash collections (including cash sales of finance receivables) in relation to the aggregate of the total estimated collection projections made at the time of each respective pool purchase, adjusted for buybacks.
21
Owned Portfolio Personnel Performance:
The Company measures the productivity of each collector each month, breaking results into groups of similarly tenured collectors. The following three tables display various productivity measures tracked by the Company.
Collector by Tenure
1 Calculated based on actual employees (collectors) with one year of service or more.
2 Calculated using total hours worked by all collectors, including those in training to produce a full time equivalent “FTE”.
Monthly Cash Collections by Tenure 1
YTD Cash Collections per Hour Paid 1
1 Cash collections (assigned and unassigned) divided by total hours paid (including holiday, vacation and sick time) to all collectors (including those in training).
22
Cash collections have substantially exceeded revenue in each quarter since the Company’s formation. The following chart illustrates the consistent excess of the Company’s cash collections on its owned portfolios over the income recognized on finance receivables on a quarterly basis. The difference between cash collections and income recognized is referred to as Payments Applied to Principal. It is also referred to as Amortization. This amortization is the portion of cash collections that is used to recover the cost of the portfolio investment represented on the Statement of Financial Position.
Seasonality
The Company depends on the ability to collect on its owned and serviced defaulted consumer receivables. Collections tend to be higher in the first and second quarters of the year and lower in the third and fourth quarters of the year, due to consumer payment patterns in connection with seasonal employment trends, income tax refunds, and holiday spending habits. Due to the Company’s historical quarterly increases in cash collections, its growth has partially masked the impact of this seasonality.
Quarterly Cash Collections
23
The following table shows the changes in finance receivables, including the amounts paid to acquire new portfolios.
The following tables categorize the Company’s owned portfolios as of June 30, 2004 into the major asset types and account types represented, respectively:
24
As shown in the following chart, as of June 30, 2004 a majority of the Company’s portfolios are secondary and tertiary accounts but it purchases or services accounts at any point in the delinquency cycle.
The Company also reviews the geographic distribution of accounts within a portfolio because it has found that certain states have more debtor-friendly laws than others and, therefore, are less desirable from a collectibility perspective. In addition, economic factors and bankruptcy trends vary regionally and are factored into the Company’s maximum purchase price equation.
As the following chart illustrates, as of June 30, 2004 the Company’s overall portfolio of defaulted consumer receivables is generally balanced geographically.
25
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Historically, the Company’s primary sources of cash have been cash flows from operations, bank borrowings, and equity offerings. Cash has been used for acquisitions of finance receivables, repayments of bank borrowings, purchases of property and equipment, and working capital to support the Company’s growth.
The Company believes that funds generated from operations, together with existing cash and available borrowings under its credit agreement will be sufficient to finance its current operations, planned capital expenditure requirements, and internal growth at least through the next twelve months. However, the Company could require additional debt or equity financing if it were to make any other significant acquisitions requiring cash during that period.
Cash generated from operations is dependent upon the Company’s ability to collect on its defaulted consumer receivables. Many factors, including the economy and the Company’s ability to hire and retain qualified collectors and managers, are essential to its ability to generate cash flows. Fluctuations in these factors that cause a negative impact on the Company’s business could have a material impact on its expected future cash flows.
The Company’s operating activities provided cash of $22.1 million and $12.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. In these periods, cash from operations was generated primarily from net income earned through cash collections and commissions received for the period which increased from $9.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 to $12.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. The change in tax related accounts accounted for $8.1 million and $3.1 million of the increase in operating cash flow for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The remaining increase was due to changes in other accounts related to the operating activities of the Company.
The Company’s investing activities used cash of $5.2 million and $22.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Cash used in investing activities is primarily driven by acquisitions of defaulted consumer receivables, net of cash collections applied to principal on finance receivables.
The Company’s financing activities provided cash of $542,000 and $461,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Cash used in financing activities is primarily driven by payments on long term debt and capital lease obligations. During 2004, the Company completed a financing arrangement with its main depository institution to finance equipment purchases at its newly leased Norfolk facility.
Cash paid for interest expenses was $137,000 and $156,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The interest expenses were paid for capital lease obligations and other long-term debt.
The Company maintains a $25.0 million revolving line of credit with RBC Centura Bank (“RBC”) pursuant to an agreement entered into on November 28, 2003. The credit facility bears interest at a spread over LIBOR and extends through November 28, 2004. The agreement provides for:
This facility had no amounts outstanding at June 30, 2004.
26
As of June 30, 2004 there are five loans outstanding. On July 20, 2000, PRA Holding I, entered into a credit facility for a $550,000 loan, for the purpose of purchasing a building and land in Hutchinson, Kansas. The loan bears interest at a variable rate based on LIBOR and consists of monthly principal payments for 60 months and a final installment of unpaid principal and accrued interest payable on July 21, 2005. On February 9, 2001, the Company entered into a commercial loan agreement in the amount of $107,000 in order to purchase equipment for its Norfolk, Virginia location. This loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 7.9% and matures on February 1, 2006. On February 20, 2002, PRA Holding I entered into an additional arrangement for a $500,000 commercial loan in order to finance construction of a parking lot at the Company’s Norfolk, Virginia location. This loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 6.47% and matures on September 1, 2007. On May 1, 2003, the Company entered into a commercial loan agreement in the amount of $975,000 to finance equipment purchases for its Hampton, Virginia location. This loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 4.25% and matures on May 1, 2008. On January 9, 2004, the Company entered into a commercial loan agreement in the amount of $750,000 to finance equipment purchases at its newly leased Norfolk facility. This loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 4.45% and matures on January 1, 2009.
Contractual Obligations
Obligations of the Company that exist as of June 30, 2004 are as follows:
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company does not have any off balance sheet arrangements as defined by regulation S-K 303(a)(4).
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2003, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued Statement of Position (“SOP”) 03-03, “Accounting for Loans or Certain Securities Acquired in a Transfer.” This SOP proposes guidance on accounting for differences between contractual and expected cash flows from an investor’s initial investment in loans or debt securities acquired in a transfer if those differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality. This SOP is effective for loans acquired in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004. The SOP would limit the revenue that may be accrued to the excess of the estimate of expected future cash flows over a portfolio’s initial cost of accounts receivable acquired. The SOP would require that the excess of the contractual cash flows over expected cash flows not be recognized as an adjustment of revenue, expense, or on the balance sheet. The SOP would freeze the internal rate of return, referred to as IRR, originally estimated when the accounts receivable are purchased for subsequent impairment testing. Rather than lower the estimated IRR if the original collection estimates are not received, the carrying value of a portfolio would be written down to maintain the original IRR. Increases in expected future cash flows would be recognized prospectively through adjustment of the IRR over a portfolio’s remaining life. The SOP provides that previously issued annual financial statements would not need to be restated. Management is in the process of evaluating the application of this SOP.
In March 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued an Exposure Draft on “Share-Based Payment, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 123 and 95.” This proposed Statement would neither change the
27
accounting in FASB Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” for transactions in which an enterprise exchanges its equity instruments for services of parties other than employees nor change the accounting for stock ownership plans, which are subject to AICPA Statement of Position 93-6, “Employer’s Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans.” The Board intends to reconsider the accounting for those transactions and plan in a later phase of its project on equity-based compensation. In this proposed Statement, the Board believes that employee services received in exchange for equity instruments give rise to recognizable compensation cost as the services are used in the issuing entity’s operations. In addition, the proposed Statement would require that public companies measure the compensation cost related to employee services received in exchange for equity instruments issued based on the grant-date fair value of those instruments. The Board will also consider other items such as streamlining volatility assumptions and addressing the fair value measurement models. Management will continue to assess the potential impact this statement will have on the Company; however, the Company has adopted SFAS 123 and currently expenses all equity-based compensation in the current period.
Critical Accounting Policy
The Company utilizes the interest method under guidance provided by Practice Bulletin 6, “Amortization of Discounts on Certain Acquired Loans,” to determine income recognized on finance receivables. Under this method, each static pool of receivables it acquires is statistically modeled to determine its projected cash flows. A yield is then established which, when applied to the outstanding balance of the receivables, results in the recognition of income at a constant yield relative to the remaining balance in the pool. Each pool is analyzed monthly to assess the actual performance to that expected by the model. If differences are noted, the yield is adjusted prospectively to reflect the estimate of cash flows.
28
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk.
The Company’s exposure to market risk relates to interest rate risk with its variable rate credit line. As of June 30, 2004, the Company had no variable rate debt outstanding on its revolving credit lines. The Company did have variable rate debt outstanding on its long-term debt collateralized by the Kansas real estate. A 10% change in future interest rates on the variable rate credit line would not lead to a material decrease in future earnings assuming all other factors remained constant.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
Within 90 days prior to the date of this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14. Based on the foregoing, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in timely alerting the Company’s management to material information relating to the Company required to be included in the Company’s Exchange Act reports.
There have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect the internal controls subsequent to the date the Company completed its evaluation.
29
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 4. Submission to a Vote of Security Holders.
On May 12, 2004, the Company convened its Annual Meeting of Stockholders in Norfolk, Virginia. The matters voted on at the meeting were: (1) the election of two directors of the Company, each serving for a term of three years; (2) the approval of the Amended and Restated Portfolio Recovery Associates 2002 Stock Option Plan and 2004 Restricted Stock Plan; and (3) the ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s accountants and independent auditors for the year ended December 31, 2004.
The voting was as follows for the election of directors:
The voting was as follows for the approval of the Amended and Restated Portfolio Recovery Associates 2002 Stock Option Plan and 2004 Restricted Stock Plan:
The voting was as follows for the ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s accountants and independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2004:
There were no broker non-votes.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.
30
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
31