Companies:
10,758
total market cap:
A$189.968 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ AUD
$
USD
๐บ๐ธ
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
Tanger Inc.
SKT
#3485
Rank
A$5.62 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
A$49.09
Share price
-0.68%
Change (1 day)
-4.51%
Change (1 year)
๐ Real estate
๐ฐ Investment
๐๏ธ REITs
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Stock Splits
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Annual Reports (10-K)
Tanger Inc.
Quarterly Reports (10-Q)
Financial Year FY2017 Q3
Tanger Inc. - 10-Q quarterly report FY2017 Q3
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
United States
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2017
OR
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _________ to _________
Commission file number 1-11986 (Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.)
Commission file number 333-3526-01 (Tanger Properties Limited Partnership)
TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC.
TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
North Carolina (Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.)
56-1815473
North Carolina (Tanger Properties Limited Partnership)
56-1822494
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
3200 Northline Avenue, Suite 360, Greensboro, NC 27408
(Address of principal executive offices)
(336) 292-3010
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
Yes
x
No
o
Tanger Properties Limited Partnership
Yes
x
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
Yes
x
No
o
Tanger Properties Limited Partnership
Yes
x
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer", “smaller reporting company” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
Large accelerated filer
x
Accelerated filer
o
Non-accelerated filer
o
Smaller reporting company
o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Emerging growth company
o
Tanger Properties Limited Partnership
Large accelerated filer
o
Accelerated filer
o
Non-accelerated filer
x
Smaller reporting company
o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Emerging growth company
o
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
o
Tanger Properties Limited Partnership
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
Yes
o
No
x
Tanger Properties Limited Partnership
Yes
o
No
x
As of November 3,
2017
, there were
94,528,188
common shares of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. outstanding, $.01 par value.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
This report combines the unaudited quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2017
of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and Tanger Properties Limited Partnership. Unless the context indicates otherwise, the term "Company" refers to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and subsidiaries and the term "Operating Partnership" refers to Tanger Properties Limited Partnership and subsidiaries. The terms “we”, “our” and “us” refer to the Company or the Company and the Operating Partnership together, as the text requires.
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and subsidiaries is one of the largest owners and operators of outlet centers in the United States and Canada. The Company is a fully-integrated, self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust ("REIT") which, through its controlling interest in the Operating Partnership, focuses exclusively on developing, acquiring, owning, operating and managing outlet shopping centers. The outlet centers and other assets are held by, and all of the operations are conducted by, the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries. Accordingly, the descriptions of the business, employees and properties of the Company are also descriptions of the business, employees and properties of the Operating Partnership. As the Operating Partnership is the issuer of our registered debt securities, we are required to present a separate set of financial statements for this entity.
The Company owns the majority of the units of partnership interest issued by the Operating Partnership through its two wholly-owned subsidiaries, Tanger GP Trust and Tanger LP Trust. Tanger GP Trust is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. Tanger LP Trust holds a limited partnership interest. As of
September 30, 2017
, the Company, through its ownership of Tanger GP Trust and Tanger LP Trust, owned
94,528,188
units of the Operating Partnership and other limited partners (the "Non-Company LPs") collectively owned
5,027,781
Class A common limited partnership units. Each Class A common limited partnership unit held by the Non-Company LPs is exchangeable for one of the Company's common shares, subject to certain limitations to preserve the Company's status as a REIT. Class B common limited partnership units, which are held by Tanger LP Trust, are not exchangeable for common shares of the Company.
Management operates the Company and the Operating Partnership as one enterprise. The management of the Company consists of the same members as the management of the Operating Partnership. These individuals are officers of the Company and employees of the Operating Partnership. The individuals that comprise the Company's Board of Directors are also the same individuals that make up Tanger GP Trust's Board of Trustees.
We believe combining the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q of the Company and the Operating Partnership into this single report results in the following benefits:
•
enhancing investors' understanding of the Company and the Operating Partnership by enabling investors to view the business as a whole in the same manner as management views and operates the business;
•
eliminating duplicative disclosure and providing a more streamlined and readable presentation since a substantial portion of the disclosure applies to both the Company and the Operating Partnership; and
•
creating time and cost efficiencies through the preparation of one combined report instead of two separate reports.
There are only a few differences between the Company and the Operating Partnership, which are reflected in the disclosure in this report. We believe it is important, however, to understand these differences between the Company and the Operating Partnership in the context of how the Company and the Operating Partnership operate as an interrelated consolidated company.
As stated above, the Company is a REIT, whose only material asset is its ownership of partnership interests of the Operating Partnership through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, the Tanger GP Trust and Tanger LP Trust. As a result, the Company does not conduct business itself, other than issuing public equity from time to time and incurring expenses required to operate as a public company. However, all operating expenses incurred by the Company are reimbursed by the Operating Partnership, thus the only material item on the Company's income statement is its equity in the earnings of the Operating Partnership. Therefore, the assets and liabilities and the revenues and expenses of the Company and the Operating Partnership are the same on their respective financial statements, except for immaterial differences related to cash, other assets and accrued liabilities that arise from public company expenses paid by the Company. The Company itself does not hold any indebtedness but does guarantee certain debt of the Operating Partnership, as disclosed in this report.
2
The Operating Partnership holds all of the outlet centers and other assets, including the ownership interests in consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures. The Operating Partnership conducts the operations of the business and is structured as a partnership with no publicly traded equity. Except for net proceeds from public equity issuances by the Company, which are contributed to the Operating Partnership in exchange for partnership units, the Operating Partnership generates the capital required through its operations, its incurrence of indebtedness or through the issuance of partnership units.
Noncontrolling interests, shareholder's equity and partner's capital are the main areas of difference between the consolidated financial statements of the Company and those of the Operating Partnership. The limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership held by the Non-Company LPs are accounted for as partner's capital in the Operating Partnership's financial statements and as noncontrolling interests in the Company's financial statements.
To help investors understand the significant differences between the Company and the Operating Partnership, this report presents the following separate sections, as applicable, for each of the Company and the Operating Partnership:
•
Consolidated financial statements;
•
The following notes to the consolidated financial statements:
•
Debt of the Company and the Operating Partnership;
•
Shareholders' Equity, if applicable, and Partners' Equity;
•
Earnings Per Share and Earnings Per Unit;
•
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income of the Company and the Operating Partnership;
•
Liquidity and Capital Resources in the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
This report also includes separate Item 4. Controls and Procedures sections and separate Exhibit 31 and 32 certifications for each of the Company and the Operating Partnership in order to establish that the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of each entity have made the requisite certifications and that the Company and Operating Partnership are compliant with Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. §1350.
The separate sections in this report for the Company and the Operating Partnership specifically refer to the Company and the Operating Partnership. In the sections that combine disclosure of the Company and the Operating Partnership, this report refers to actions or holdings as being actions or holdings of the Company. Although the Operating Partnership is generally the entity that enters into contracts and joint ventures and holds assets and debt, reference to the Company is appropriate because the business is one enterprise and the Company operates the business through the Operating Partnership.
The Company currently consolidates the Operating Partnership because it has (1) the power to direct the activities of the Operating Partnership that most significantly impact the Operating Partnership’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses and the right to receive the residual returns of the Operating Partnership that could be potentially significant. The separate discussions of the Company and the Operating Partnership in this report should be read in conjunction with each other to understand the results of the Company on a consolidated basis and how management operates the Company.
3
TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Index
Page Number
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC.
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Balance Sheets - as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
5
Consolidated Statements of Operations - for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
6
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income - for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
7
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity - for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
8
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
10
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Balance Sheets - as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
11
Consolidated Statements of Operations - for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
12
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income - for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
13
Consolidated Statements of Equity - for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
14
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
15
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and Tanger Properties Limited Partnership
16
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
37
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
60
Item 4. Controls and Procedures (Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and Tanger Properties Limited Partnership)
61
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
62
Item 1A. Risk Factors
62
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
62
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure
62
Item 6. Exhibits
63
Signatures
64
4
PART I. - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1 - Financial Statements of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data, unaudited)
September 30, 2017
December 31, 2016
Assets
Rental property:
Land
$
268,821
$
272,153
Buildings, improvements and fixtures
2,694,549
2,647,477
Construction in progress
87,762
46,277
3,051,132
2,965,907
Accumulated depreciation
(875,121
)
(814,583
)
Total rental property, net
2,176,011
2,151,324
Cash and cash equivalents
8,773
12,222
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures
125,819
128,104
Deferred lease costs and other intangibles, net
135,768
151,579
Prepaids and other assets
95,075
82,985
Total assets
$
2,541,446
$
2,526,214
Liabilities and Equity
Liabilities
Debt:
Senior, unsecured notes, net
$
1,134,181
$
1,135,309
Unsecured term loan, net
323,011
322,410
Mortgages payable, net
170,776
172,145
Unsecured lines of credit, net
146,013
58,002
Total debt
1,773,981
1,687,866
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
84,091
78,143
Other liabilities
74,339
54,764
Total liabilities
1,932,411
1,820,773
Commitments and contingencies
Equity
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.:
Common shares, $.01 par value, 300,000,000 shares authorized, 94,528,188 and 96,095,891 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively
945
961
Paid in capital
781,020
820,251
Accumulated distributions in excess of net income
(183,975
)
(122,701
)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(19,713
)
(28,295
)
Equity attributable to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
578,277
670,216
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests:
Noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership
30,758
35,066
Noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships
—
159
Total equity
609,035
705,441
Total liabilities and equity
$
2,541,446
$
2,526,214
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except share data, unaudited)
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
2017
2016
2017
2016
Revenues:
Base rentals
$
80,349
$
79,569
$
241,467
$
227,195
Percentage rentals
3,138
2,995
6,798
7,471
Expense reimbursements
34,180
33,125
104,801
97,121
Management, leasing and other services
588
806
1,776
3,259
Other income
2,510
2,642
6,905
6,229
Total revenues
120,765
119,137
361,747
341,275
Expenses:
Property operating
37,571
37,442
115,074
110,328
General and administrative
10,934
12,128
33,846
35,368
Acquisition costs
—
487
—
487
Abandoned pre-development costs
(99
)
—
528
—
Depreciation and amortization
30,976
29,205
95,175
82,078
Total expenses
79,382
79,262
244,623
228,261
Operating income
41,383
39,875
117,124
113,014
Other income (expense):
Interest expense
(16,489
)
(15,516
)
(49,496
)
(44,200
)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
(35,626
)
—
(35,626
)
—
Gain on sale of assets
—
1,418
6,943
6,305
Gain on previously held interest in acquired joint venture
—
46,258
—
95,516
Other non-operating income (expense)
591
24
683
378
Income (loss) before equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated joint ventures
(10,141
)
72,059
39,628
171,013
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated joint ventures
(5,893
)
715
(1,201
)
7,680
Net income (loss)
(16,034
)
72,774
38,427
178,693
Noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership
815
(3,668
)
(1,920
)
(9,009
)
Noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships
—
(2
)
—
(13
)
Net income (loss) attributable to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
$
(15,219
)
$
69,104
$
36,507
$
169,671
Basic earnings per common share:
Net income (loss)
$
(0.17
)
$
0.72
$
0.38
$
1.77
Diluted earnings per common share:
Net income (loss)
$
(0.17
)
$
0.72
$
0.38
$
1.76
Dividends declared per common share
$
0.3425
$
0.3250
$
1.01
$
0.9350
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands, unaudited)
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
2017
2016
2017
2016
Net income (loss)
$
(16,034
)
$
72,774
$
38,427
$
178,693
Other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency translation adjustments
4,737
(1,731
)
8,821
6,970
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges
39
2,228
217
(1,601
)
Other comprehensive income
4,776
497
9,038
5,369
Comprehensive income (loss)
(11,258
)
73,271
47,465
184,062
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
573
(3,695
)
(2,376
)
(9,294
)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
$
(10,685
)
$
69,576
$
45,089
$
174,768
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
7
TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(In thousands, except share and per share data, unaudited)
Common shares
Paid in capital
Accumulated distributions in excess of earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Equity attributable to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
Noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership
Noncontrolling
interests in
other consolidated partnerships
Total
equity
Balance,
December 31, 2015
$
959
$
806,379
$
(195,486
)
$
(36,715
)
$
575,137
$
30,309
$
586
$
606,032
Net income
—
—
169,671
—
169,671
9,009
13
178,693
Other comprehensive income
—
—
—
5,097
5,097
272
—
5,369
Compensation under Incentive Award Plan
—
12,556
—
—
12,556
—
—
12,556
Issuance of 57,700 common shares upon exercise of options
—
1,693
—
—
1,693
—
—
1,693
Grant of 173,124 restricted common share awards, net of forfeitures
2
(2
)
—
—
—
—
—
—
Issuance of 24,040 deferred shares
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Withholding of 66,427 common shares for employee income taxes
—
(2,164
)
—
—
(2,164
)
—
—
(2,164
)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests
—
—
—
—
—
—
35
35
Adjustment for noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership
—
(385
)
—
—
(385
)
385
—
—
Adjustment for noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships
—
4
—
—
4
—
(4
)
—
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest in other consolidated partnership
—
(1,617
)
—
—
(1,617
)
—
(325
)
(1,942
)
Common dividends ($.935 per share)
—
—
(89,750
)
—
(89,750
)
—
—
(89,750
)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
—
—
—
—
—
(4,725
)
(145
)
(4,870
)
Balance,
September 30, 2016
$
961
$
816,464
$
(115,565
)
$
(31,618
)
$
670,242
$
35,250
$
160
$
705,652
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
8
TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(In thousands, except share and per share data, unaudited)
Common shares
Paid in capital
Accumulated distributions in excess of earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Equity attributable to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
Noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership
Noncontrolling
interests in
other consolidated partnerships
Total
equity
Balance, December 31, 2016
$
961
$
820,251
$
(122,701
)
$
(28,295
)
$
670,216
$
35,066
$
159
$
705,441
Net income
—
—
36,507
—
36,507
1,920
—
38,427
Other comprehensive income
—
—
—
8,582
8,582
456
—
9,038
Compensation under Incentive Award Plan
—
10,891
—
—
10,891
—
—
10,891
Issuance of 1,800 common shares upon exercise of options
—
54
—
—
54
—
—
54
Grant of 411,968 restricted common share awards, net of forfeitures
4
(4
)
—
—
—
—
—
—
Repurchase of 1,911,585 common shares, including transaction costs
(19
)
(49,343
)
—
—
(49,362
)
—
—
(49,362
)
Withholding of
69,886 common shares for employee income taxes
(1
)
(2,435
)
—
—
(2,436
)
—
—
(2,436
)
Adjustment for noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership
—
1,606
—
—
1,606
(1,606
)
—
—
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest in other consolidated partnership
—
—
—
—
—
—
(159
)
(159
)
Common dividends ($1.01 per share)
—
—
(97,781
)
—
(97,781
)
—
—
(97,781
)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
—
—
—
—
—
(5,078
)
—
(5,078
)
Balance,
September 30, 2017
$
945
$
781,020
$
(183,975
)
$
(19,713
)
$
578,277
$
30,758
$
—
$
609,035
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
9
TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands, unaudited)
Nine months ended September 30,
2017
2016
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
$
38,427
$
178,693
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
95,175
82,078
Amortization of deferred financing costs
2,640
2,350
Gain on sale of assets
(6,943
)
(6,305
)
Gain on previously held interest in acquired joint venture
—
(95,516
)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
35,626
—
Equity in (earnings) losses of unconsolidated joint ventures
1,201
(7,680
)
Equity-based compensation expense
10,114
11,815
Amortization of debt (premiums) and discounts, net
363
1,160
Amortization (accretion) of market rent rate adjustments, net
2,107
2,087
Straight-line rent adjustments
(4,749
)
(5,092
)
Distributions of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures
8,128
10,571
Changes in other assets and liabilities:
Other assets
(1,131
)
1,093
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
653
2,512
Net cash provided by operating activities
181,611
177,766
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Additions to rental property
(132,612
)
(112,213
)
Acquisitions of interests in unconsolidated joint ventures, net of cash acquired
—
(45,219
)
Additions to investments in unconsolidated joint ventures
(4,033
)
(27,851
)
Net proceeds from sale of assets
39,213
28,706
Change in restricted cash
—
118,370
Additions to non-real estate assets
(8,384
)
(8,982
)
Distributions in excess of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures
16,019
14,193
Additions to deferred lease costs
(4,218
)
(5,273
)
Other investing activities
4,963
(1,221
)
Net cash used in investing activities
(89,052
)
(39,490
)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Cash dividends paid
(97,781
)
(109,879
)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership
(5,078
)
(5,786
)
Proceeds from revolving credit facility
543,866
733,450
Repayments of revolving credit facility
(456,666
)
(727,750
)
Proceeds from notes, mortgages and loans
299,460
338,270
Repayments of notes, mortgages and loans
(302,240
)
(329,603
)
Payment of make-whole premium related to early extinguishment of debt
(34,143
)
—
Repayment of deferred financing obligation
—
(28,388
)
Repurchase of common shares, including transaction costs
(49,362
)
—
Employee income taxes paid related to shares withheld upon vesting of equity awards
(2,436
)
(2,164
)
Additions to deferred financing costs
(2,900
)
(4,243
)
Proceeds from exercise of options
54
1,693
Proceeds from other financing activities
12,054
35
Payment for other financing activities
(782
)
(99
)
Net cash used in financing activities
(95,954
)
(134,464
)
Effect of foreign currency rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
(54
)
532
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
(3,449
)
4,344
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
12,222
21,558
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
$
8,773
$
25,902
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
10
Item 1 - Financial Statements of Tanger Properties Limited Partnership
TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except unit data, unaudited)
September 30, 2017
December 31, 2016
Assets
Rental property:
Land
$
268,821
$
272,153
Buildings, improvements and fixtures
2,694,549
2,647,477
Construction in progress
87,762
46,277
3,051,132
2,965,907
Accumulated depreciation
(875,121
)
(814,583
)
Total rental property, net
2,176,011
2,151,324
Cash and cash equivalents
8,669
12,199
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures
125,819
128,104
Deferred lease costs and other intangibles, net
135,768
151,579
Prepaids and other assets
94,550
82,481
Total assets
$
2,540,817
$
2,525,687
Liabilities and Equity
Liabilities
Debt:
Senior, unsecured notes, net
$
1,134,181
$
1,135,309
Unsecured term loan, net
323,011
322,410
Mortgages payable, net
170,776
172,145
Unsecured lines of credit, net
146,013
58,002
Total debt
1,773,981
1,687,866
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
83,462
77,616
Other liabilities
74,339
54,764
Total liabilities
1,931,782
1,820,246
Commitments and contingencies
Equity
Partners' Equity:
General partner, 1,000,000 units outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
5,854
6,485
Limited partners, 5,027,781 and 5,027,781 Class A common units, and 93,528,188 and 95,095,891 Class B common units outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively
623,977
728,631
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(20,796
)
(29,834
)
Total partners' equity
609,035
705,282
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated partnerships
—
159
Total equity
609,035
705,441
Total liabilities and equity
$
2,540,817
$
2,525,687
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
11
TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per unit data, unaudited)
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
2017
2016
2017
2016
Revenues:
Base rentals
$
80,349
$
79,569
$
241,467
$
227,195
Percentage rentals
3,138
2,995
6,798
7,471
Expense reimbursements
34,180
33,125
104,801
97,121
Management, leasing and other services
588
806
1,776
3,259
Other income
2,510
2,642
6,905
6,229
Total revenues
120,765
119,137
361,747
341,275
Expenses:
Property operating
37,571
37,442
115,074
110,328
General and administrative
10,934
12,128
33,846
35,368
Acquisition costs
—
487
—
487
Abandoned pre-development costs
(99
)
—
528
—
Depreciation and amortization
30,976
29,205
95,175
82,078
Total expenses
79,382
79,262
244,623
228,261
Operating income
41,383
39,875
117,124
113,014
Other income (expense):
Interest expense
(16,489
)
(15,516
)
(49,496
)
(44,200
)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
(35,626
)
—
(35,626
)
—
Gain on sale of assets
—
1,418
6,943
6,305
Gain on previously held interest in acquired joint venture
—
46,258
—
95,516
Other non-operating income (expense)
591
24
683
378
Income (loss) before equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated joint ventures
(10,141
)
72,059
39,628
171,013
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated joint ventures
(5,893
)
715
(1,201
)
7,680
Net income (loss)
(16,034
)
72,774
38,427
178,693
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated partnerships
—
(2
)
—
(13
)
Net income (loss) available to partners
(16,034
)
72,772
38,427
178,680
Net income (loss) available to limited partners
(15,874
)
72,052
38,048
176,912
Net income (loss) available to general partner
$
(160
)
$
720
$
379
$
1,768
Basic earnings per common unit:
Net income (loss)
$
(0.17
)
$
0.72
$
0.38
$
1.77
Diluted earnings per common unit:
Net income (loss)
$
(0.17
)
$
0.72
$
0.38
$
1.76
Distribution declared per common unit
$
0.3425
$
0.3250
$
1.01
$
0.9350
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
12
TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands, unaudited)
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
2017
2016
2017
2016
Net income (loss)
$
(16,034
)
$
72,774
$
38,427
$
178,693
Other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency translation adjustments
4,737
(1,731
)
8,821
6,970
Changes in fair value of cash flow hedges
39
2,228
217
(1,601
)
Other comprehensive income
4,776
497
9,038
5,369
Comprehensive income (loss)
(11,258
)
73,271
47,465
184,062
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated partnerships
—
(2
)
—
(13
)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the Operating Partnership
$
(11,258
)
$
73,269
$
47,465
$
184,049
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
13
TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(In thousands, except unit and per unit data, unaudited)
General partner
Limited partners
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Total partners' equity
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated partnerships
Total equity
Balance, December 31, 2015
$
5,726
$
638,422
$
(38,702
)
$
605,446
$
586
$
606,032
Net income
1,768
176,912
—
178,680
13
178,693
Other comprehensive income
—
—
5,369
5,369
—
5,369
Compensation under Incentive Award Plan
—
12,556
—
12,556
—
12,556
Issuance of 57,700 common units upon exercise of options
—
1,693
—
1,693
—
1,693
Grant of 173,124 restricted common share awards by the Company, net of forfeitures
—
—
—
—
—
—
Issuance of 24,040 deferred units
—
—
—
—
—
—
Withholding of 66,427 common units for employee income taxes
—
(2,164
)
—
(2,164
)
—
(2,164
)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests
—
—
—
—
35
35
Adjustments for noncontrolling interests in consolidated partnerships
—
4
—
4
(4
)
—
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest in other consolidated partnership
—
(1,617
)
—
(1,617
)
(325
)
(1,942
)
Common distributions ($.935 per common unit)
(935
)
(93,540
)
—
(94,475
)
—
(94,475
)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
—
—
—
—
(145
)
(145
)
Balance, September 30, 2016
$
6,559
$
732,266
$
(33,333
)
$
705,492
$
160
$
705,652
General partner
Limited partners
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Total partners' equity
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated partnerships
Total equity
Balance, December 31, 2016
$
6,485
$
728,631
$
(29,834
)
$
705,282
$
159
$
705,441
Net income
379
38,048
—
38,427
—
38,427
Other comprehensive income
—
—
9,038
9,038
—
9,038
Compensation under Incentive Award Plan
—
10,891
—
10,891
—
10,891
Issuance of 1,800 common units upon exercise of options
—
54
—
54
—
54
Grant of 411,968 restricted common share awards by the Company
—
—
—
—
—
—
Repurchase of 1,911,585 units, including transaction costs
—
(49,362
)
—
(49,362
)
—
(49,362
)
Withholding of 69,886 common units for employee income taxes
—
(2,436
)
—
(2,436
)
—
(2,436
)
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest in other consolidated partnership
—
—
—
—
(159
)
(159
)
Common distributions ($1.01 per common unit)
(1,010
)
(101,849
)
—
(102,859
)
—
(102,859
)
Balance, September 30, 2017
$
5,854
$
623,977
$
(20,796
)
$
609,035
$
—
$
609,035
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
14
TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands, unaudited)
Nine months ended September 30,
2017
2016
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
$
38,427
$
178,693
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
95,175
82,078
Amortization of deferred financing costs
2,640
2,350
Gain on sale of assets
(6,943
)
(6,305
)
Gain on previously held interest in acquired joint venture
—
(95,516
)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
35,626
—
Equity in (earnings) losses of unconsolidated joint ventures
1,201
(7,680
)
Equity-based compensation expense
10,114
11,815
Amortization of debt (premiums) and discounts, net
363
1,160
Amortization (accretion) of market rent rate adjustments, net
2,107
2,087
Straight-line rent adjustments
(4,749
)
(5,092
)
Distributions of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures
8,128
10,571
Changes in other assets and liabilities:
Other assets
(1,110
)
780
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
551
2,782
Net cash provided by operating activities
181,530
177,723
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Additions to rental property
(132,612
)
(112,213
)
Acquisitions of interests in unconsolidated joint ventures, net of cash acquired
—
(45,219
)
Additions to investments in unconsolidated joint ventures
(4,033
)
(27,851
)
Net proceeds from sale of assets
39,213
28,706
Change in restricted cash
—
118,370
Additions to non-real estate assets
(8,384
)
(8,982
)
Distributions in excess of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures
16,019
14,193
Additions to deferred lease costs
(4,218
)
(5,273
)
Other investing activities
4,963
(1,221
)
Net cash used in investing activities
(89,052
)
(39,490
)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Cash distributions paid
(102,859
)
(115,665
)
Proceeds from revolving credit facility
543,866
733,450
Repayments of revolving credit facility
(456,666
)
(727,750
)
Proceeds from notes, mortgages and loans
299,460
338,270
Repayments of notes, mortgages and loans
(302,240
)
(329,603
)
Payment of make-whole premium related to early extinguishment of debt
(34,143
)
—
Repayment of deferred financing obligation
—
(28,388
)
Repurchase of units, including transaction costs
(49,362
)
—
Employee income taxes paid related to shares withheld upon vesting of equity awards
(2,436
)
(2,164
)
Additions to deferred financing costs
(2,900
)
(4,243
)
Proceeds from exercise of options
54
1,693
Proceeds from other financing activities
12,054
35
Payment for other financing activities
(782
)
(99
)
Net cash used in financing activities
(95,954
)
(134,464
)
Effect of foreign currency on cash and cash equivalents
(54
)
532
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
(3,530
)
4,301
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
12,199
21,552
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
$
8,669
$
25,853
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
15
TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Business
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and subsidiaries is one of the largest owners and operators of outlet centers in the United States and Canada. We are a fully-integrated, self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust ("REIT") which, through our controlling interest in the Operating Partnership, focuses exclusively on developing, acquiring, owning, operating and managing outlet shopping centers. As of
September 30, 2017
, we owned and operated
35
consolidated outlet centers, with a total gross leasable area of approximately
12.6 million
square feet. We also had partial ownership interests in
8
unconsolidated outlet centers totaling approximately
2.4 million
square feet, including
4
outlet centers in Canada.
Our outlet centers and other assets are held by, and all of our operations are conducted by, Tanger Properties Limited Partnership and subsidiaries. Accordingly, the descriptions of our business, employees and properties are also descriptions of the business, employees and properties of the Operating Partnership. Unless the context indicates otherwise, the term "Company" refers to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and subsidiaries and the term, "Operating Partnership", refers to Tanger Properties Limited Partnership and subsidiaries. The terms "we", "our" and "us" refer to the Company or the Company and the Operating Partnership together, as the text requires.
The Company owns the majority of the units of partnership interest issued by the Operating Partnership through its
two
wholly-owned subsidiaries, Tanger GP Trust and Tanger LP Trust. Tanger GP Trust is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. Tanger LP Trust holds a limited partnership interest. As of
September 30, 2017
, the Company, through its ownership of Tanger GP Trust and Tanger LP Trust, owned
94,528,188
units of the Operating Partnership and other limited partners (the "Non-Company LPs") collectively owned
5,027,781
Class A common limited partnership units. Each Class A common limited partnership unit held by the Non-Company LPs is exchangeable for
one
of the Company's common shares, subject to certain limitations to preserve the Company's REIT status. Class B common limited partnership units, which are held by Tanger LP Trust, are not exchangeable for common shares of the Company.
2. Basis of Presentation
The unaudited consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared pursuant to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of the Company's and the Operating Partnership's combined Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2016
. The December 31,
2016
balance sheet data in this Form 10-Q was derived from audited financial statements. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the SEC's rules and regulations, although management believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the financial statements for the interim periods have been made. The results of interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for a full year.
The Company currently consolidates the Operating Partnership because it has (1) the power to direct the activities of the Operating Partnership that most significantly impact the Operating Partnership’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses and the right to receive the residual returns of the Operating Partnership that could be potentially significant.
16
We consolidate properties that are wholly owned and properties where we own less than 100% but we control. Control is determined using an evaluation based on accounting standards related to the consolidation of voting interest entities and variable interest entities ("VIE"). For joint ventures that are determined to be a VIE, we consolidate the entity where we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary. Determination of the primary beneficiary is based on whether an entity has (1) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance, and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Our determination of the primary beneficiary considers all relationships between us and the VIE, including management agreements and other contractual arrangements.
Investments in real estate joint ventures that we do not control but may exercise significant influence are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. These investments are recorded initially at cost and subsequently adjusted for our equity in the joint venture's net income or loss, cash contributions, distributions and other adjustments required under the equity method of accounting.
For certain investments in real estate joint ventures, we record our equity in the venture's net income or loss under the hypothetical liquidation at book value (“HLBV”) method of accounting due to the structures and the preferences we receive on the distributions from our joint ventures pursuant to the respective joint venture agreements for those joint ventures. Under this method, we recognize income and loss in each period based on the change in liquidation proceeds we would receive from a hypothetical liquidation of our investment based on depreciated book value. Therefore, income or loss may be allocated disproportionately as compared to the ownership percentages due to specified preferred return rate thresholds and may be more or less than actual cash distributions received and more or less than what we may receive in the event of an actual liquidation.
We separately report investments in joint ventures for which accumulated distributions have exceeded investments in, and our share of net income or loss of, the joint ventures within other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets because we are committed to provide further financial support to these joint ventures. The carrying amount of our investments in the Charlotte and Galveston/Houston joint ventures are less than zero because of financing or operating distributions that were greater than net income, as net income includes non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization.
"Noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership" reflects the Non-Company LP's percentage ownership of the Operating Partnership's units. "Noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships" consist of outside equity interests in partnerships or joint ventures not wholly owned by the Company or the Operating Partnership that are consolidated with the financial results of the Company and Operating Partnership because the Operating Partnership exercises control over the entities that own the properties. Noncontrolling interests are initially recorded in the consolidated balance sheets at fair value based upon purchase price allocations. Income is allocated to the noncontrolling interests based on the allocation provisions within the partnership or joint venture agreements.
17
3. Disposition of Property
The following table sets forth certain summarized information regarding the property sold during the
nine months ended September 30, 2017
:
Property
Location
Date Sold
Square Feet
(in 000's)
Net Sales Proceeds
(in 000's)
Gain on Sale(in 000's)
Westbrook
Westbrook, CT
May 2017
290
$
39,212
$
6,943
The rental property sold did not meet the criteria for reporting discontinued operations, thus its results of operations have remained in continuing operations.
4. Developments of Consolidated Outlet Centers
The table below sets forth our consolidated outlet centers under development as of
September 30, 2017
:
Project
Approximate square feet
(in 000's)
Costs Incurred to Date
(in millions)
Projected Opening
New development:
Fort Worth
352
$
74.7
October 2017
Lancaster Expansion
In September 2017, we opened a
123,000
square foot expansion of our outlet center in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
Fort Worth
In October 2017, we opened a
352,000
square foot wholly-owned outlet center center in the greater Fort Worth, Texas area. The outlet center is located within the 279-acre Champions Circle mixed-use development adjacent to Texas Motor Speedway.
Interest Costs Capitalized
Interest costs capitalized for development activities, including development in our unconsolidated joint ventures, was
$798,000
and
$2.0 million
for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2017
, respectively, and
$574,000
and
$1.7 million
for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2016
, respectively.
18
5
. Investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Joint Ventures
The equity method of accounting is used to account for each of the individual joint ventures. We have an ownership interest in the following unconsolidated real estate joint ventures:
As of September 30, 2017
Joint Venture
Outlet Center Location
Ownership %
Square Feet
(in 000's)
Carrying Value of Investment (in millions)
Total Joint Venture Debt, Net
(in millions)
(1)
Columbus
Columbus, OH
50.0
%
355
$
6.8
$
84.4
National Harbor
National Harbor, MD
50.0
%
341
2.4
86.4
RioCan Canada
Various
50.0
%
924
116.6
11.4
Investments included in total assets
$
125.8
Charlotte
(3)
Charlotte, NC
50.0
%
398
$
(3.6
)
$
89.8
Galveston/Houston
(2)(3)
Texas City, TX
50.0
%
353
(12.5
)
79.4
Investments included in other liabilities
$
(16.1
)
As of December 31, 2016
Joint Venture
Outlet Center Location
Ownership %
Square Feet
(in 000's)
Carrying Value of Investment (in millions)
Total Joint Venture Debt, Net
(in millions)
(1)
Columbus
Columbus, OH
50.0
%
355
$
6.7
$
84.2
National Harbor
National Harbor, MD
50.0
%
341
4.1
86.1
RioCan Canada
Various
50.0
%
901
117.3
11.1
Investments included in total assets
$
128.1
Charlotte
(3)
Charlotte, NC
50.0
%
398
$
(2.5
)
$
89.7
Galveston/Houston
(2)(3)
Texas City, TX
50.0
%
353
(3.8
)
64.9
Investments included in other liabilities
$
(6.3
)
(1)
Net of debt origination costs and including premiums of
$1.6 million
and
$1.6 million
as of
September 30, 2017
and December 31, 2016, respectively.
(2)
In July 2017, the joint venture amended and restated the initial construction loan to increase the amount available to borrow from
$70.0 million
to
$80.0 million
and extended the maturity date until July 2020 with
two
one
-year options. The amended and restated loan also changed the interest rate from LIBOR +
1.50%
to an interest rate of LIBOR +
1.65%
. At the closing of the amendment, the joint venture distributed approximately
$14.5 million
equally between the partners.
(3)
The negative carrying value is due to the distributions of proceeds from mortgage loans and quarterly distributions of excess cash flow exceeding the original contributions from the partners.
19
Fees we received for various services provided to our unconsolidated joint ventures were recognized in management, leasing and other services as follows (in thousands):
Three months ended
Nine months ended
September 30,
September 30,
2017
2016
2017
2016
Fee:
Management and marketing
$
564
$
656
1,676
2,199
Development and leasing
20
65
$
87
$
611
Loan guarantee
4
85
13
449
Total Fees
$
588
$
806
$
1,776
$
3,259
Our investments in real estate joint ventures are reduced by the percentage of the profits earned for leasing and development services associated with our ownership interest in each joint venture. Our carrying value of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures differs from our share of the assets reported in the "Summary Balance Sheets - Unconsolidated Joint Ventures" shown below due to adjustments to the book basis, including intercompany profits on sales of services that are capitalized by the unconsolidated joint ventures. The differences in basis (totaling
$3.7 million
for both the period ended
September 30, 2017
and the period ended December 31,
2016
) are amortized over the various useful lives of the related assets.
RioCan Canada
Rental property held and used by our RioCan joint venture is reviewed for impairment in the event that facts and circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In such an event, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset is compared to the asset's carrying amount, and if less, we recognize an impairment loss in an amount by which the carrying amount exceeds its fair value.
During the third quarter 2017, the joint venture determined for its Bromont and Saint Sauveur, Quebec outlet centers that the estimated future undiscounted cash flows of that property did not exceed the property's carrying value based on our expectations of the future performance of the centers. Therefore, the joint venture recorded a
$18.0 million
non-cash impairment charge in its statement of operations, which equaled the excess of the properties carrying value over its fair value. The fair value was determined using a market approach considering the prevailing market income capitalization rates for similar assets. Our share of this impairment charge,
$9.0 million
, was recorded in equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures in our consolidated statement of operations.
20
Condensed combined summary financial information of unconsolidated joint ventures accounted for using the equity method is as follows (in thousands):
Condensed Combined Balance Sheets - Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
September 30, 2017
December 31, 2016
Assets
Land
$
95,998
$
88,015
Buildings, improvements and fixtures
514,865
503,548
Construction in progress, including land under development
2,849
13,037
613,712
604,600
Accumulated depreciation
(88,163
)
(67,431
)
Total rental property, net
525,549
537,169
Cash and cash equivalents
23,769
27,271
Deferred lease costs and other intangibles, net
11,436
13,612
Prepaids and other assets
16,262
12,567
Total assets
$
577,016
$
590,619
Liabilities and Owners' Equity
Mortgages payable, net
$
351,322
$
335,971
Accounts payable and other liabilities
13,463
20,011
Total liabilities
364,785
355,982
Owners' equity
212,231
234,637
Total liabilities and owners' equity
$
577,016
$
590,619
Three months ended
Nine months ended
Condensed Combined Statements of Operations
September 30,
September 30,
- Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
2017
2016
2017
2016
Revenues
$
25,241
$
25,654
$
72,588
$
82,693
Expenses:
Property operating
8,987
9,103
27,242
30,499
General and administrative
72
95
289
390
Asset impairment
18,042
5,838
18,042
5,838
Depreciation and amortization
6,998
8,001
21,453
26,208
Total expenses
34,099
23,037
67,026
62,935
Operating income (loss)
(8,858
)
2,617
5,562
19,758
Interest expense
(2,776
)
(1,925
)
(7,497
)
(7,161
)
Other non-operating income
20
2
23
5
Net income (loss)
$
(11,614
)
$
694
$
(1,912
)
$
12,602
The Company and Operating Partnership's share of:
Net income (loss)
$
(5,893
)
$
715
$
(1,201
)
$
7,680
Depreciation and amortization expense (real estate related)
$
3,583
$
4,325
$
10,971
$
15,472
21
6
. Debt Guaranteed by the Company
All of the Company's debt is held by the Operating Partnership and its consolidated subsidiaries.
The Company guarantees the Operating Partnership's obligations with respect to its unsecured lines of credit which have a total borrowing capacity of
$520.0 million
. The Company also guarantees the Operating Partnership's unsecured term loan.
The Operating Partnership had the following principal amounts outstanding on the debt guaranteed by the Company (in thousands):
September 30, 2017
December 31, 2016
Unsecured lines of credit
$
148,200
$
61,000
Unsecured term loan
$
325,000
$
325,000
7
. Debt of the Operating Partnership
The debt of the Operating Partnership consisted of the following (in thousands):
As of
As of
September 30, 2017
December 31, 2016
Stated Interest Rate(s)
Maturity Date
Principal
Book Value
(1)
Principal
Book Value
(1)
Senior, unsecured notes:
Senior notes
6.125
%
June 2020
$
—
$
—
$
300,000
$
298,226
Senior notes
3.875
%
December 2023
250,000
245,882
250,000
245,425
Senior notes
3.750
%
December 2024
250,000
247,321
250,000
247,058
Senior notes
3.125
%
September 2026
350,000
344,993
350,000
344,600
Senior notes
3.875
%
July 2027
300,000
295,985
—
—
Mortgages payable:
Atlantic City
(2)
5.14%-7.65%
November 2021- December 2026
38,230
40,747
40,471
43,286
Foxwoods
LIBOR + 1.55%
December 2017
70,250
70,174
70,250
69,902
Southaven
LIBOR + 1.75%
April 2018
60,000
59,855
59,277
58,957
Unsecured term loan
LIBOR + 0.95%
April 2021
325,000
323,011
325,000
322,410
Unsecured lines of credit
LIBOR + 0.90%
October 2019
148,200
146,013
61,000
58,002
$
1,791,680
$
1,773,981
$
1,705,998
$
1,687,866
(1)
Including premiums and net of debt discount and debt origination costs.
(2)
The effective interest rate assigned during the purchase price allocation to the Atlantic City mortgages assumed during the acquisition in 2011 was
5.05%
.
Certain of our properties, which had a net book value of approximately
$314.5 million
at
September 30, 2017
, serve as collateral for mortgages payable. We maintain unsecured lines of credit that provide for borrowings of up to
$520.0 million
. The unsecured lines of credit include a
$20.0 million
liquidity line and a
$500.0 million
syndicated line. The syndicated line may be increased up to
$1.0 billion
through an accordion feature in certain circumstances. As of
September 30, 2017
, letters of credit totaling approximately
$5.5 million
were issued under the lines of credit.
22
We provide guarantees to lenders for our joint ventures which include standard non-recourse carve out indemnifications for losses arising from items such as but not limited to fraud, physical waste, payment of taxes, environmental indemnities, misapplication of insurance proceeds or security deposits and failure to maintain required insurance. For construction and term loans, we may include a guaranty of completion as well as a principal guaranty ranging from
5%
to
100%
of principal. The principal guarantees include terms for release or reduction based upon satisfactory completion of construction and performance targets including occupancy thresholds and minimum debt service coverage tests. As of
September 30, 2017
, the maximum amount of unconsolidated joint venture debt guaranteed by the Company was
$32.8 million
.
The unsecured lines of credit and senior unsecured notes include covenants that require the maintenance of certain ratios, including debt service coverage and leverage, and limit the payment of dividends such that dividends and distributions will not exceed funds from operations, as defined in the agreements, for the prior fiscal year on an annual basis or
95%
of funds from operations on a cumulative basis. As of
September 30, 2017
, we were in compliance with all of our debt covenants.
$300.0 Million Unsecured Senior Notes due 2027
In July 2017, we completed an underwritten public offering of
$300.0 million
of
3.875%
senior notes due 2027 (the "2027 Notes"). The 2027 Notes priced at
99.579%
of the principal amount to yield
3.926%
to maturity. The 2027 Notes pay interest semi-annually at a rate of
3.875%
per annum and mature on July 15, 2027. The estimated net proceeds from the offering, after deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses, were approximately
$295.9 million
. In August 2017, we used the net proceeds from the sale of the 2027 Notes, together with borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit, to redeem all of our
6.125%
senior notes due 2020 (the "2020 Notes") (approximately
$300.0 million
in aggregate principal amount outstanding). The 2020 Notes were redeemed at par plus a “make-whole” premium of approximately
$34.1 million
. In addition, we wrote off approximately
$1.5 million
of unamortized debt discount and debt origination costs related to the 2020 Notes.
Debt Maturities
Maturities of the existing long-term debt as of
September 30, 2017
for the next five years and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):
Calendar Year
Amount
2017
$
71,017
2018
63,183
2019
151,569
2020
3,566
2021
330,793
Thereafter
1,171,552
Subtotal
1,791,680
Net discount and debt origination costs
(17,699
)
Total
$
1,773,981
23
8. Derivative Financial Instruments
The following table summarizes the terms and fair values of our derivative financial instruments, as well as their classifications within the consolidated balance sheets (notional amounts and fair values in thousands):
Fair Value
Effective Date
Maturity Date
Notional Amount
Bank Pay Rate
Company Fixed Pay Rate
September 30, 2017
December 31, 2016
Assets (Liabilities):
November 14, 2013
August 14, 2018
$
50,000
1 month LIBOR
1.3075
%
$
52
$
(119
)
November 14, 2013
August 14, 2018
50,000
1 month LIBOR
1.2970
%
56
(110
)
November 14, 2013
August 14, 2018
50,000
1 month LIBOR
1.3025
%
54
(115
)
April 13, 2016
January 1, 2021
50,000
1 month LIBOR
1.0390
%
1,147
1,227
April 13, 2016
January 1, 2021
50,000
1 month LIBOR
1.0395
%
1,146
1,226
April 13, 2016
January 1, 2021
50,000
1 month LIBOR
1.0400
%
1,145
1,222
April 13, 2016
January 1, 2021
25,000
1 month LIBOR
0.9915
%
611
662
Total
$
325,000
$
4,211
$
3,993
The derivative financial instruments are comprised of interest rate swaps, which are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, each with a separate counterparty. We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes and currently do not have any derivatives that are not designated as hedges.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss and subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative, if significant, is recognized directly in earnings. For the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2017
and 2016, the ineffective portion was not significant.
The following table represents the effect of the derivative financial instruments on the accompanying consolidated financial statements (in thousands):
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
2017
2016
2017
2016
Interest Rate Swaps (Effective Portion):
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in OCI on derivative
$
39
$
2,228
$
217
$
(1,601
)
9
. Fair Value Measurements
Fair value guidance establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers are defined as follows:
Tier
Description
Level 1
Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets
Level 2
Inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable
Level 3
Unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions
24
The following table sets forth our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets or Liabilities
Significant Observable Inputs
Significant Unobservable Inputs
Total
Fair value as of September 30, 2017:
Asset:
Interest rate swaps (prepaids and other assets)
$
4,211
$
—
$
4,211
$
—
Total assets
$
4,211
$
—
$
4,211
$
—
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets or Liabilities
Significant Observable Inputs
Significant Unobservable Inputs
Total
Fair value as of December 31, 2016:
Asset:
Interest rate swaps (prepaids and other assets)
$
3,993
$
—
$
3,993
$
—
Total assets
$
3,993
$
—
$
3,993
$
—
Fair values of interest rate swaps are approximated using Level 2 inputs based on current market data received from financial sources that trade such instruments and are based on prevailing market data and derived from third party proprietary models based on well recognized financial principles including counterparty risks, credit spreads and interest rate projections, as well as reasonable estimates about relevant future market conditions.
The estimated fair value within the fair value hierarchy and recorded value of our debt consisting of senior unsecured notes, unsecured term loans, secured mortgages and unsecured lines of credit were as follows (in thousands):
September 30, 2017
December 31, 2016
Level 1 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets or Liabilities
$
—
$
—
Level 2 Significant Observable Inputs
1,153,778
1,137,976
Level 3 Significant Unobservable Inputs
647,877
566,668
Total fair value of debt
$
1,801,655
$
1,704,644
Recorded value of debt
$
1,773,981
$
1,687,866
Our senior unsecured notes are publicly-traded which provides quoted market rates. However, due to the limited trading volume of these notes, we have classified these instruments as Level 2 in the hierarchy. Our other debt is classified as Level 3 given the unobservable inputs utilized in the valuation. Our unsecured term loan, unsecured lines of credit and variable interest rate mortgages are all LIBOR based instruments. When selecting the discount rates for purposes of estimating the fair value of these instruments, we evaluated the original credit spreads and do not believe that the use of them differs materially from current credit spreads for similar instruments and therefore the recorded values of these debt instruments is considered their fair value.
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other assets and liabilities are reasonable estimates of their fair values because of the short maturities of these instruments.
25
10. Share Repurchase Program
In May 2017, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to
$125.0 million
of our outstanding common shares as market conditions warrant over a period commencing on May 19, 2017 and expiring on May 18, 2019. Repurchases may be made through open market, privately-negotiated, structured or derivative transactions (including accelerated share repurchase transactions), or other methods of acquiring shares. The Company intends to structure open market purchases to occur within pricing and volume requirements of Rule 10b-18. The Company may, from time to time, enter into Rule 10b5-1 plans to facilitate the repurchase of its shares under this authorization.
Between May 19, 2017 and August 25, 2017 we repurchased approximately
1.9 million
common shares on the open market at an average price of
$25.80
, totaling approximately
$49.3 million
,
exclusive of commissions and related fees. The remaining amount authorized to be repurchased under the program as of September 30, 2017 was approximately
$75.7 million
.
11. Partners' Equity of the Operating Partnership
All units of partnership interest issued by the Operating Partnership have equal rights with respect to earnings, dividends and net assets. When the Company issues common shares upon the exercise of options, the grant of restricted common share awards, or the exchange of Class A common limited partnership units, the Operating Partnership issues a corresponding Class B common limited partnership unit to Tanger LP trust, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Likewise, when the Company repurchases its common shares, the Operating Partnership repurchases an equivalent number of Class B common limited partnership units held by Tanger LP Trust.
The following table sets forth the changes in outstanding partnership units for the
nine months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
:
Limited Partnership Units
General Partnership Units
Class A
Class B
Total
Balance December 31, 2015
1,000,000
5,052,743
94,880,825
99,933,568
Grant of restricted common share awards by the Company, net of forfeitures
—
—
173,124
173,124
Issuance of deferred units
—
—
24,040
24,040
Units issued upon exercise of options
—
—
57,700
57,700
Units withheld for employee income taxes
—
—
(66,427
)
(66,427
)
Balance September 30, 2016
1,000,000
5,052,743
95,069,262
100,122,005
Balance December 31, 2016
1,000,000
5,027,781
95,095,891
100,123,672
Grant of restricted common share awards by the Company, net of forfeitures
—
—
411,968
411,968
Repurchase of units
—
—
(1,911,585
)
(1,911,585
)
Units issued upon exercise of options
—
—
1,800
1,800
Units withheld for employee income taxes
—
—
(69,886
)
(69,886
)
Balance September 30, 2017
1,000,000
5,027,781
93,528,188
98,555,969
26
12. Earnings Per Share of the Company
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators in computing the Company's earnings per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
2017
2016
2017
2016
Numerator:
Net income (loss) attributable to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
$
(15,219
)
$
69,104
$
36,507
$
169,671
Less allocation of earnings to participating securities
(306
)
(627
)
(907
)
(1,649
)
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
$
(15,525
)
$
68,477
$
35,600
$
168,022
Denominator:
Basic weighted average common shares
93,923
95,156
94,781
95,075
Effect of notional units
—
426
—
393
Effect of outstanding options and certain restricted common shares
—
90
23
69
Diluted weighted average common shares
93,923
95,672
94,804
95,537
Basic earnings per common share:
Net income (loss)
$
(0.17
)
$
0.72
$
0.38
$
1.77
Diluted earnings per common share:
Net income (loss)
$
(0.17
)
$
0.72
$
0.38
$
1.76
We determine diluted earnings per share based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding combined with the incremental weighted average shares that would have been outstanding assuming all potentially dilutive securities were converted into common shares at the earliest date possible.
The notional units are considered contingently issuable common shares and are included in earnings per share if the effect is dilutive using the treasury stock method and the common shares would be issuable if the end of the reporting period were the end of the contingency period. For the both the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2017
,
858,116
notional units were excluded from the computation, respectively, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016,
531,746
and
564,849
notional units were excluded from the computation, respectively, because these notional units either would not have been issuable if the end of the reporting period were the end of the contingency period or as they were anti-dilutive.
The effect of dilutive common shares is determined using the treasury stock method, whereby outstanding options are assumed exercised at the beginning of the reporting period and the exercise proceeds from such options and the average measured but unrecognized compensation cost during the period are assumed to be used to repurchase our common shares at the average market price during the period. For the three months ended
September 30, 2017
,
235,700
options were excluded from the computation and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2017
,
173,500
options were excluded from the computation. For the three months ended September 30, 2016, there were
no
options excluded from the computation. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016,
145,300
options were excluded from the computation, respectively, as they were anti-dilutive. The assumed exchange of the partnership units held by the Non-Company LPs as of the beginning of the year, which would result in the elimination of earnings allocated to the noncontrolling interest in the Operating Partnership, would have no impact on earnings per share since the allocation of earnings to a common limited partnership unit, as if exchanged, is equivalent to earnings allocated to a common share.
Certain of the Company's unvested restricted common share awards contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents. The impact of these unvested restricted common share awards on earnings per share has been calculated using the two-class method whereby earnings are allocated to the unvested restricted common share awards based on dividends declared and the unvested restricted common shares' participation rights in undistributed earnings. Unvested restricted common shares that do not contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are included in the diluted earnings per share computation if the effect is dilutive, using the treasury stock method.
27
13. Earnings Per Unit of the Operating Partnership
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators in computing earnings per unit (in thousands, except per unit amounts):
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
2017
2016
2017
2016
Numerator:
Net income (loss) attributable to partners of the Operating Partnership
$
(16,034
)
$
72,772
$
38,427
$
178,680
Less allocation of earnings to participating securities
(306
)
(629
)
(907
)
(1,651
)
Net income (loss) available to common unitholders of the Operating Partnership
$
(16,340
)
$
72,143
$
37,520
$
177,029
Denominator:
Basic weighted average common units
98,951
100,209
99,809
100,127
Effect of notional units
—
426
—
393
Effect of outstanding options and certain restricted common units
—
90
23
69
Diluted weighted average common units
98,951
100,725
99,832
100,589
Basic earnings per common unit:
Net income (loss)
$
(0.17
)
$
0.72
$
0.38
$
1.77
Diluted earnings per common unit:
Net income (loss)
$
(0.17
)
$
0.72
$
0.38
$
1.76
We determine diluted earnings per unit based on the weighted average number of common units outstanding combined with the incremental weighted average units that would have been outstanding assuming all potentially dilutive securities were converted into common units at the earliest date possible.
The notional units are considered contingently issuable common units and are included in earnings per unit if the effect is dilutive using the treasury stock method and the common shares would be issuable if the end of the reporting period were the end of the contingency period. For both the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2017
,
858,116
notional units were excluded from the computation and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016,
531,746
and
546,849
notional units were excluded from the computation, respectively, because these notional units either would not have been issuable if the end of the reporting period were the end of the contingency period or as they were anti-dilutive.
The effect of dilutive common units is determined using the treasury stock method, whereby outstanding options are assumed exercised at the beginning of the reporting period and the exercise proceeds from such options and the average measured but unrecognized compensation cost during the period are assumed to be used to repurchase our common units at the average market price during the period. The market price of a common unit is considered to be equivalent to the market price of a Company common share. For the three months ended
September 30, 2017
,
235,700
options were excluded from the computation and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2017
,
173,500
options were excluded from the computation. For the three months ended September 30, 2016, there were
no
options excluded from the computation. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016,
145,300
options were excluded from the computation as they were anti-dilutive.
Certain of the Company's unvested restricted common share awards contain non-forfeitable rights to distributions or distribution equivalents. The impact of the corresponding unvested restricted unit awards on earnings per unit has been calculated using the two-class method whereby earnings are allocated to the unvested restricted unit awards based on distributions declared and the unvested restricted units' participation rights in undistributed earnings. Unvested restricted common units that do not contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are included in the diluted earnings per unit computation if the effect is dilutive, using the treasury stock method.
28
14. Equity-Based Compensation of the Company
We have a shareholder approved equity-based compensation plan, the Incentive Award Plan of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and Tanger Properties Limited Partnership (Amended and Restated as of April 4, 2014) (the "Plan"), which covers our independent directors, officers, employees and consultants. For each common share issued by the Company, the Operating Partnership issues one corresponding unit of partnership interest to the Company's wholly owned subsidiaries. Therefore, when the Company grants an equity-based award, the Operating Partnership treats each award as having been granted by the Operating Partnership. In the discussion below, the term "we" refers to the Company and the Operating Partnership together and the term "shares" is meant to also include corresponding units of the Operating Partnership.
We recorded equity-based compensation expense in general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations as follows (in thousands):
Three months ended
Nine months ended
September 30,
September 30,
2017
2016
2017
2016
Restricted common shares
$
2,302
$
3,020
$
7,039
$
8,527
Notional unit performance awards
939
1,057
2,870
2,967
Options
77
83
205
321
Total equity-based compensation
$
3,318
$
4,160
$
10,114
$
11,815
Equity-based compensation expense capitalized as a part of rental property and deferred lease costs were as follows (in thousands):
Three months ended
Nine months ended
September 30,
September 30,
2017
2016
2017
2016
Equity-based compensation expense capitalized
$
267
$
244
$
777
$
741
Restricted Common Share Awards
During February 2017, the Company granted
253,431
restricted common shares to the Company's independent directors and the Company's senior executive officers. The grant date fair value of the awards ranged from
$30.16
to
$34.47
per share. The independent directors' restricted common shares vest ratably over a
three
year period and the senior executive officers' restricted shares vest ratably over a
three
or
five
year period. For the restricted shares issued to our chief executive officer, the restricted share agreement requires him to hold the shares for a minimum of
three
years following each vesting date. Compensation expense related to the amortization of the deferred compensation is being recognized in accordance with the vesting schedule of the restricted shares.
For certain shares that vest during the period, we withhold shares with value equivalent to the employees' minimum statutory obligation for the applicable income and other employment taxes, and remit cash to the appropriate taxing authorities. The total number of shares withheld upon vesting was
69,886
for the nine months ended
September 30, 2017
.
No
shares were withheld for the three months ended
September 30, 2017
. The total number of shares withheld upon vesting was
6,045
and
66,427
for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2016
, respectively. The total number of shares withheld was based on the value of the restricted common shares on the vesting date as determined by our closing share price on the day prior to the vesting date. Total amounts paid for the employees' tax obligation to taxing authorities was
$2.4 million
for the nine months ended
September 30, 2017
and was
$244,000
and
$2.2 million
for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2016
, respectively. These amounts are reflected as financing activities within the consolidated statements of cash flows.
29
2017 Outperformance Plan
In February 2017, the Compensation Committee of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. approved the terms of the Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. 2017 Outperformance Plan (the “2017 OPP"), a long-term incentive compensation plan. Recipients receive notional units which may convert, subject to the achievement of the goals described below, into restricted common shares of the Company based on the Company’s absolute share price appreciation (or total shareholder return) and its share price appreciation relative to its peer group over a
three
-year measurement period. Any shares earned at the end of the
three
-year measurement period are subject to a time-based vesting schedule, with
50%
of the shares vesting immediately following issuance, and the remaining
50%
vesting one year thereafter, contingent upon continued employment with the Company through the vesting dates (unless terminated prior thereto (a) by the Company without cause, (b) by participant for good reason or (c) due to death or disability).
The following table sets forth 2017 OPP performance targets and other relevant information about the 2017 OPP:
Performance targets
(1)
Absolute portion of award:
Percent of total award
50%
Absolute share price appreciation range
18% - 35%
Percentage of units to be earned
20%-100%
Relative portion of award:
Percent of total award
50%
Percentile rank of peer group range
(2)
40th - 70th
Percentage of units to be earned
20%-100%
Maximum number of restricted common shares that may be earned
296,400
Grant date fair value per share
$
16.60
(1)
The number of restricted common shares received under the 2017 OPP will be determined on a pro-rata basis by linear interpolation between share price appreciation thresholds, both for absolute share price appreciation and for relative share price appreciation amongst the Company's peer group. The share price for the purposes of calculation of share price appreciation will be adjusted on a penny-for-penny basis with respect to any dividend payments made during the measurement period.
(2)
The peer group is based on companies included in the SNL Equity REIT index.
The fair values of the 2017 OPP awards granted during the nine months ended
September 30, 2017
were determined at the grant dates using a Monte Carlo simulation pricing model and the following assumptions:
Risk free interest rate
(1)
1.52
%
Expected dividend yield
(2)
3.4
%
Expected volatility
(3)
19
%
(1)
Represents the interest rate as of the grant date on US treasury bonds having the same life as the estimated life of the restricted unit grants.
(2)
The dividend yield is calculated utilizing the dividends paid for the previous five-year period.
(3)
Based on a mix of historical and implied volatility for our common shares and the common shares of our peer index companies over the measurement period.
2014 Outperformance Plan
On December 31, 2016, the measurement period for the 2014 Outperformance Plan ('the 2014 OPP") expired. Based on the Company’s absolute share price appreciation (or total shareholder return) over the
three
year measurement period, we issued
184,455
restricted common shares in January 2017, with
94,663
vesting immediately and the remaining to vest in January one year thereafter, contingent upon continued employment with the Company through the vesting date. Our relative total shareholder return for the 2014 OPP did not meet the minimum share price appreciation and no shares were earned under this component of the 2014 OPP.
30
15. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) of the Company
The following table presents changes in the balances of each component of accumulated comprehensive income (loss) for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2017
(in thousands):
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Noncontrolling Interest in Operating Partnership Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Foreign Currency
Cash flow hedges
Total
Foreign Currency
Cash flow hedges
Total
Balance June 30, 2017
$
(28,209
)
$
3,962
$
(24,247
)
$
(1,534
)
$
209
$
(1,325
)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
4,497
89
4,586
240
5
245
Reclassification out of accumulated other comprehensive income into interest expense
—
(52
)
(52
)
—
(3
)
(3
)
Balance September 30, 2017
$
(23,712
)
$
3,999
$
(19,713
)
$
(1,294
)
$
211
$
(1,083
)
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Noncontrolling Interest in Operating Partnership Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Foreign Currency
Cash flow hedges
Total
Foreign Currency
Cash flow hedges
Total
Balance December 31, 2016
$
(32,087
)
$
3,792
$
(28,295
)
$
(1,740
)
$
201
$
(1,539
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
8,375
(154
)
8,221
446
(9
)
437
Reclassification out of accumulated other comprehensive income into interest expense
—
361
361
—
19
19
Balance September 30, 2017
$
(23,712
)
$
3,999
$
(19,713
)
$
(1,294
)
$
211
$
(1,083
)
31
The following table presents changes in the balances of each component of accumulated comprehensive loss for the three and
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
(in thousands):
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Noncontrolling Interest in Operating Partnership Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Foreign Currency
Cash flow hedges
Total
Foreign Currency
Cash flow hedges
Total
Balance June 30, 2016
$
(27,869
)
$
(4,221
)
$
(32,090
)
$
(1,516
)
$
(224
)
$
(1,740
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
(1,644
)
1,596
(48
)
(87
)
84
(3
)
Reclassification out of accumulated other comprehensive income into interest expense
—
520
520
—
28
28
Balance September 30, 2016
$
(29,513
)
$
(2,105
)
$
(31,618
)
$
(1,603
)
$
(112
)
$
(1,715
)
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Noncontrolling Interest in Operating Partnership Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Foreign Currency
Cash flow hedges
Total
Foreign Currency
Cash flow hedges
Total
Balance December 31, 2015
$
(36,130
)
$
(585
)
$
(36,715
)
$
(1,956
)
$
(31
)
$
(1,987
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
6,617
(2,885
)
3,732
353
(154
)
199
Reclassification out of accumulated other comprehensive income into interest expense
—
1,365
1,365
—
73
73
Balance September 30, 2016
$
(29,513
)
$
(2,105
)
$
(31,618
)
$
(1,603
)
$
(112
)
$
(1,715
)
We expect within the next twelve months to reclassify into earnings as a decrease to interest expense approximately
$444,000
of the amounts recorded within accumulated other comprehensive income related to the interest rate swap agreements in effect and as of
September 30, 2017
.
32
16. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) of the Operating Partnership
The following table presents changes in the balances of each component of accumulated comprehensive income (loss) for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2017
(in thousands):
Foreign Currency
Cash flow hedges
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance June 30, 2017
$
(29,743
)
$
4,171
$
(25,572
)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
4,737
94
4,831
Reclassification out of accumulated other comprehensive income into interest expense
—
(55
)
(55
)
Balance September 30, 2017
$
(25,006
)
$
4,210
$
(20,796
)
Foreign Currency
Cash flow hedges
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance December 31, 2016
$
(33,827
)
$
3,993
$
(29,834
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
8,821
(163
)
8,658
Reclassification out of accumulated other comprehensive income into interest expense
—
380
380
Balance September 30, 2017
$
(25,006
)
$
4,210
$
(20,796
)
The following table presents changes in the balances of each component of accumulated comprehensive loss for the three and
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
(in thousands):
Foreign Currency
Cash flow hedges
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance June 30, 2016
$
(29,385
)
$
(4,445
)
$
(33,830
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
(1,731
)
1,680
(51
)
Reclassification out of accumulated other comprehensive income into interest expense
—
548
548
Balance September 30, 2016
$
(31,116
)
$
(2,217
)
$
(33,333
)
Foreign Currency
Cash flow hedges
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance December 31, 2015
$
(38,086
)
$
(616
)
$
(38,702
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
6,970
(3,039
)
3,931
Reclassification out of accumulated other comprehensive income into interest expense
—
1,438
1,438
Balance September 30, 2016
$
(31,116
)
$
(2,217
)
$
(33,333
)
We expect within the next twelve months to reclassify into earnings as a decrease to interest expense approximately
$444,000
of the amounts recorded within accumulated other comprehensive income related to the interest rate swap agreements in effect and as of
September 30, 2017
.
33
17. Non-Cash Activities
We purchase capital equipment and incur costs relating to construction of facilities, including tenant finishing allowances. Expenditures included in accounts payable and accrued expenses were as follows (in thousands):
September 30, 2017
September 30, 2016
Costs relating to construction included in accounts payable and accrued expenses
$
27,090
$
20,340
18. New Accounting Pronouncements
Recently adopted accounting standards
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, the Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force), which finalizes Proposed ASU No. EITF-15F of the same name, and addresses stakeholders’ concerns regarding diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows under Topic 230, Statement of Cash Flows, and other Topics. ASU 2016-15 clarifies guidance on the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows to reduce diversity in practice with respect to (i) debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs, (ii) settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing, (iii) contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, (iv) proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims, (v) proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies, including bank-owned life insurance policies, (vi) distributions received from equity method investees, (vii) beneficial interests in securitization transactions, and (viii) separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and for interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The ASU should be adopted using a retrospective transition approach. We early adopted ASU 2016-15 during the third quarter of 2017, with retrospective application to our consolidated statements of cash flows. For distributions received from equity method investees, we have chosen the cumulative-earnings approach, which is also our current policy for these distributions. ASU 2016-15 requires debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs to be classified as cash outflows for financing activities. As such, the make-whole premium related to the 2020 notes has been classified as a financing activity. The retrospective application of ASU 2016-15 had no impact on any of the prior periods presented.
Recently issued accounting standards to be adopted
In August 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. The new guidance will make more financial and nonfinancial hedging strategies eligible for hedge accounting. It also amends the presentation and disclosure requirements and changes how companies assess effectiveness. It is intended to more closely align hedge accounting with companies’ risk management strategies, simplify the application of hedge accounting, and increase transparency as to the scope and results of hedging programs. The amendments can be adopted immediately in any interim or annual period (including the current period). The mandatory effective date for calendar year-end public companies is January 1, 2019. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new guidance, but we do not expect the adoption to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting. ASU 2017-09 amends the scope of modification accounting for share-based payment arrangements, and provides guidance on the types of changes to the terms or conditions of share-based payment awards to which an entity would be required to apply modification accounting under ASC 718. ASU 2017-07 is effective for annual reporting periods, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new guidance, but we do not expect the adoption to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
34
In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-05, "Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets." ASU 2017-05 clarifies the definition of an in-substance nonfinancial asset and changes the accounting for partial sales of nonfinancial assets to be more consistent with the accounting for a sale of a business pursuant to ASU 2017-01. This update is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 using a full retrospective or modified retrospective method and is required to be adopted in conjunction with ASU 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" discussed below. We will adopt ASU 2017-05 effective January 1, 2018, along with our adoption of ASU 2014-09, using the modified retrospective approach. We do not actively sell operating properties as part of our core business strategy and, accordingly, the sale of properties does not generally constitute a significant part of our revenue and cash flows. Subsequent to adoption, we believe most of our future contributions of nonfinancial assets to our joint ventures where we cease to have a controlling financial interest, if any, will result in the recognition of a full gain or loss as if we sold 100% of the nonfinancial asset and we will also measure our retained interest at fair value.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Clarifying the Definition of a Business (Topic 805). ASU 2017-01 clarifies the definition of a business and provides further guidance for evaluating whether a transaction will be accounted for as an acquisition of an asset or a business. ASU 2017-01 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. The update should be applied prospectively. We early adopted this standard on January 1, 2017. We believe most of our future acquisitions of operating properties will qualify as asset acquisitions and certain transaction costs associated with these acquisitions will be capitalized.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash. This ASU requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash. Amounts generally described as restricted cash should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The update should be applied retrospectively to each period presented. The pronouncement is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. We plan to adopt this pronouncement for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2018, and the pronouncement will result in changes to our consolidated statements of cash flows such that restricted cash amounts will be included in the beginning-of-period and end-of-period cash and cash equivalents totals.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which requires measurement and recognition of expected versus incurred credit losses for financial assets held. This ASU will be applied on a prospective basis for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for fiscal years beginning and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new guidance, but we do not expect the adoption to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases. ASU 2016-02, codified in ASC 842, amends the existing accounting standards for lease accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets and making targeted changes to lessor accounting. ASU 2016-02 will be effective beginning in the first quarter of 2019. Early adoption of ASU 2016-02 as of its issuance is permitted. We will adopt ASU 2016-02 effective January 1, 2019. The new leases standard requires a modified retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to use certain transition relief. Based on a preliminary assessment, we expect our significant operating lease commitments, primarily ground leases, will be required to be recognized as operating lease liabilities and right-of-use assets upon adoption, resulting in an increase in the assets and liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. Upon adoption, we anticipate separating lease components from nonlease components, which will be evaluated under ASU 2014-09, as described below. We are continuing our evaluation, which may identify additional impacts this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
35
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. This ASU is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 applies to all contracts with customers, except those that are within the scope of other topics in the FASB's Accounting Standards Codification, including real estate lease contracts, which the majority of our revenue is derived. The guidance also provides a model for the measurement and recognition of gains and losses on the sale of certain nonfinancial assets, such as property, including real estate. We are required to adopt the new pronouncement in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 using one of two retrospective application methods. In March 2016, April 2016, and May 2016, the FASB issued the following amendments to clarify the implementation guidance: ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net), ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, and ASU No. 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)—Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients.
We will adopt ASU 2014-09 effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective approach. Our revenues that will be impacted by this standard primarily include revenue from management, marketing, development, and leasing fees for services performed related to various joint ventures that we manage and other ancillary income earned at our properties. While the total revenue recognized over time would not differ under the new guidance, the recognition pattern may be different under the new guidance. Through the nine months ended
September 30, 2017
and for the year ended December 31, 2016, these revenues were approximately
3%
of consolidated revenue, for both periods. As a result, we currently do not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-09 or related amendments and modifications by the FASB to have a material impact on the amount of revenue we recognize in our consolidated financial statements but we do expect to have additional disclosure and reclassification of amounts with in our revenue section of the consolidated income statement as required by the adoption of ASU 2014-09. In addition, we currently expect our cumulative catch-up upon the adoption of this standard, if any, will not be material.
19. Subsequent Events
In October 2017, the Company's Board of Directors declared a
$0.3425
cash dividend per common share payable on November 15, 2017 to each shareholder of record on October 31, 2017, and the Trustees of Tanger GP Trust declared a
$0.3425
cash distribution per Operating Partnership unit to the Operating Partnership's unitholders.
Subsequent to quarter end, we successfully settled litigation with the estate of our former partner in the Foxwoods, Connecticut joint venture. In return for mutual releases and
no
cash consideration, the estate tendered its partnership interest to the Company. Prior to this settlement, we had a
100%
economic interest in the consolidated joint venture as a result of our preferred equity interest and the capital and distribution provisions in the joint venture agreement. On November 3, 2017, Tanger repaid the
$70.3 million
floating rate mortgage loan secured by the property with borrowings under its unsecured floating rate lines of credit.
36
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The discussion of our results of operations reported in the unaudited, consolidated statements of operations compares the three and
nine months
ended
September 30, 2017
with the three and
nine months
ended
September 30, 2016
. The results of operations discussion is combined for Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and Tanger Properties Limited Partnership because the results are virtually the same for both entities. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this report. Historical results and percentage relationships set forth in the unaudited, consolidated statements of operations, including trends which might appear, are not necessarily indicative of future operations. Unless the context indicates otherwise, the term "Company" refers to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and subsidiaries and the term "Operating Partnership" refers to Tanger Properties Limited Partnership and subsidiaries. The terms "we", "our" and "us" refer to the Company or the Company and the Operating Partnership together, as the text requires.
Cautionary Statements
Certain statements made below are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We intend for such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Reform Act of 1995 and have included this statement for purposes of complying with these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies, beliefs and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words "believe", "expect", "intend", "anticipate", "estimate", "project", or similar expressions. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding our: future issuances of equity and debt and the expected use of proceeds from such issuances; potential sales or purchases of outlet centers; anticipated results of operations, liquidity and working capital; new outlet center developments, market and industry trends and consumer behavior; renewal and re
-
lease of leased space; expansions and renovations; and real estate joint ventures. You should not rely on forward-looking statements since they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors which are, in some cases, beyond our control and which could materially affect our actual results, performance or achievements. Important factors which may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations include, but are not limited to: our inability to develop new outlet centers or expand existing outlet centers successfully; risks related to the economic performance and market value of our outlet centers; the relative illiquidity of real property investments; impairment charges affecting our properties; our dispositions of assets may not achieve anticipated results; competition for the acquisition and development of outlet centers, and our inability to complete outlet centers we have identified; environmental regulations affecting our business; risk associated with a possible terrorist activity or other acts or threats of violence and threats to public safety; our dependence on rental income from real property; our dependence on the results of operations of our retailers; the fact that certain of our properties are subject to ownership interests held by third parties, whose interests may conflict with ours; risks related to uninsured losses; the risk that consumer, travel, shopping and spending habits may change; risks associated with our Canadian investments; risks associated with attracting and retaining key personnel; risks associated with debt financing; risk associated with our guarantees of debt for, or other support we may provide to, joint venture properties; our potential failure to qualify as a REIT; our legal obligation to make distributions to our shareholders; legislative or regulatory actions that could adversely affect our shareholders; our dependence on distributions from the Operating Partnership to meet our financial obligations, including dividends; the risk of a cyber-attack or an act of cyber-terrorism and other important factors set forth under Item 1A - "Risk Factors" in the Company's and the Operating Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2016
.
37
General Overview
As of
September 30, 2017
, we had
35
consolidated outlet centers in
22
states totaling
12.6 million
square feet. We also had
8
unconsolidated outlet centers in
6
states or provinces totaling
2.4 million
square feet. The table below details our new developments, expansions and dispositions of consolidated and unconsolidated outlet centers that significantly impacted our results of operations and liquidity from January 1,
2016
to
September 30, 2017
(square feet in thousands):
Consolidated Outlet Centers
Unconsolidated Joint Venture Outlet Centers
Outlet Center
Quarter Acquired/Opened/Disposed
Square Feet
Outlet Centers
Square Feet
Outlet Centers
As of January 1, 2016
11,746
34
2,747
9
New Developments:
Columbus
Second Quarter
—
—
355
1
Daytona Beach
Fourth Quarter
349
1
—
—
Acquisitions:
Westgate
Second Quarter
408
1
(408
)
(1
)
Savannah
Third Quarter
419
1
(419
)
(1
)
Expansions:
Ottawa
First Quarter
—
—
32
—
Savannah
Second Quarter
—
—
42
—
Dispositions:
Fort Myers
First Quarter
(199
)
(1
)
—
—
Demolition:
Lancaster
Various
(25
)
—
—
—
Other
12
—
(1
)
—
As of December 31, 2016
12,710
36
2,348
8
Expansion:
Ottawa
Second Quarter
—
—
39
—
Lancaster
Third Quarter
148
—
—
—
Dispositions:
Westbrook
Second Quarter
(290
)
(1
)
—
—
Other
7
—
(16
)
—
As of September 30, 2017
12,575
35
2,371
8
Our Westgate and Savannah outlet centers were previously held in unconsolidated joint ventures prior to acquiring our partners' interest in each venture in June 2016 and August 2016, respectively.
38
The following table summarizes certain information for our existing outlet centers in which we have an ownership interest as of
September 30, 2017
. Except as noted, all properties are fee owned.
Consolidated Outlet Centers
Legal
Square
%
Location
Ownership %
Feet
Occupied
Deer Park, New York
100
749,074
95
Riverhead, New York
(1)
100
729,706
98
Rehoboth Beach, Delaware
(1)
100
557,404
99
Foley, Alabama
100
556,677
99
Atlantic City, New Jersey
(1) (4)
99
489,706
87
San Marcos, Texas
100
471,816
97
Sevierville, Tennessee
(1)
100
448,355
100
Savannah, Georgia
100
429,089
97
Myrtle Beach Hwy 501, South Carolina
100
425,334
94
Jeffersonville, Ohio
100
411,849
95
Glendale, Arizona (Westgate)
100
407,673
97
Myrtle Beach Hwy 17, South Carolina
(1)
100
403,339
100
Charleston, South Carolina
100
382,117
97
Lancaster, Pennsylvania
100
377,299
93
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
100
372,958
100
Commerce, Georgia
100
371,408
97
Grand Rapids, Michigan
100
357,080
97
Daytona Beach, Florida
100
351,704
97
Branson, Missouri
100
329,861
100
Locust Grove, Georgia
100
321,070
97
Gonzales, Louisiana
100
321,066
99
Southaven, Mississippi
(2) (4)
50
320,341
97
Park City, Utah
100
319,661
97
Mebane, North Carolina
100
318,910
100
Howell, Michigan
100
314,459
98
Mashantucket, Connecticut (Foxwoods)
(1) (2) (4)
67
311,614
94
Williamsburg, Iowa
100
276,331
97
Tilton, New Hampshire
100
250,107
93
Hershey, Pennsylvania
100
247,500
100
Hilton Head II, South Carolina
100
206,564
96
Ocean City, Maryland
(1)
100
198,800
98
Hilton Head I, South Carolina
100
181,670
99
Terrell, Texas
100
177,800
96
Blowing Rock, North Carolina
100
104,009
98
Nags Head, North Carolina
100
82,161
100
Totals
12,574,512
97
(3)
(1)
These properties or a portion thereof are subject to a ground lease.
(2)
Based on capital contribution and distribution provisions in the joint venture agreement, we expect our economic interest in the venture's cash flow to be greater than our legal ownership percentage. We currently receive substantially all the economic interest of the property.
(3)
Excludes the occupancy rate at our Daytona Beach outlet center which opened during the fourth quarter of 2016 and has not yet stabilized.
(4)
Property encumbered by mortgage. See notes
6
and
7
to the consolidated financial statements for further details of our debt obligations.
39
Unconsolidated joint venture properties
Legal
Square
%
Location
Ownership %
Feet
Occupied
Charlotte, North Carolina
(1)
50
397,844
99
Ottawa, Ontario
50
355,497
93
Columbus, Ohio
(1)
50
355,220
96
Texas City, Texas (Galveston/Houston)
(1)
50
352,705
99
National Harbor, Maryland
(1)
50
341,156
98
Cookstown, Ontario
50
307,779
98
Bromont, Quebec
50
161,307
72
Saint-Sauveur, Quebec
(1)
50
99,405
96
Total
2,370,913
95
(2)
(1)
Property encumbered by mortgage. See note
5
to the consolidated financial statements for further details of our debt obligations.
(2)
Excludes the occupancy rate at our Columbus outlet center which opened during the second quarter of 2016 and has not yet stabilized.
Leasing Activity
The following table provides information for our consolidated outlet centers regarding space re-leased or renewed:
Trailing twelve months ended September 30, 2017
(1)
# of Leases
Square Feet
(in 000's)
Average
Annual
Straight-line Rent (psf)
(2)
Average
Tenant
Allowance (psf)
Average Initial Term
(in years)
Net Average
Annual
Straight-line Rent (psf)
(3)
Re-tenant
87
380
$
34.76
$
55.47
8.94
$
28.56
Renewal
253
1,126
$
32.56
$
0.24
4.50
$
32.51
Trailing twelve months ended September 30, 2016
(1)
# of Leases
Square Feet
(in 000's)
Average
Annual
Straight-line Rent (psf)
(2)
Average
Tenant
Allowance (psf)
Average Initial Term
(in years)
Net Average
Annual
Straight-line Rent (psf)
(3)
Re-tenant
103
401
$
41.47
$
57.04
8.54
$
34.79
Renewal
290
1,337
$
32.22
$
0.41
4.71
$
32.13
(1)
Includes information for consolidated portfolio outlet centers owned as of period end date.
(2)
Includes both minimum base rent and common area maintenance rents.
(3)
Net average straight-line rent is calculated by dividing the average tenant allowance costs per square foot by the average initial term and subtracting this calculated number from the average straight-line rent per year amount. The average annual straight-line rent disclosed in the table above includes all concessions, abatements and reimbursements of rent to tenants. The average tenant allowance disclosed in the table above includes landlord costs.
40
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Comparison of the
three months ended
September 30, 2017
to the
three months ended
September 30, 2016
NET INCOME (LOSS)
Net income (loss) decreased
$88.8 million
in the
2017
period to a loss of
$16.0 million
as compared to income of
$72.8 million
for the
2016
period. The majority of this decrease was due to a loss on the early extinguishment of debt of
$35.6 million
in the 2017 period and a
$46.3 million
gain on the acquisition of our partners' equity interests in the Savannah joint venture in the 2016 period. This decrease was partially offset by improved operating income.
In the tables below, information set forth for new development represents our Daytona Beach outlet center, which opened in November 2016. Acquisitions include our Westgate and Savannah outlet centers, which were previously held in unconsolidated joint ventures prior to acquiring our partners' interest in each venture in June 2016 and August 2016, respectively. Properties disposed include our Westbrook and Fort Myers outlet centers sold in May 2017 and January 2016, respectively.
BASE RENTALS
Base rentals increased
$780,000
, or
1%
, in the 2017 period compared to the
2016
period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of base rentals (in thousands):
2017
2016
Increase/(Decrease)
Base rentals from existing properties
$
73,217
$
73,523
$
(306
)
Base rentals from new development
1,978
—
1,978
Base rentals from acquisitions
5,294
4,131
1,163
Base rentals from property disposed
—
1,134
(1,134
)
Termination fees
162
1,450
(1,288
)
Amortization of above and below market rent adjustments, net
(302
)
(669
)
367
$
80,349
$
79,569
$
780
Base rentals from existing properties decreased due primarily to a slight decrease in average portfolio occupancy.
PERCENTAGE RENTALS
Percentage rentals increased
$143,000
, or
5%
, in the 2017 period compared to the
2016
period. Percentage rentals represents revenues based on a percentage of tenants' sales volume above predetermined levels (contractual breakpoints") (in thousands):
2017
2016
Increase/(Decrease)
Percentage rentals from existing properties
$
2,738
$
2,698
$
40
Percentage rentals from new development
99
—
99
Percentage rentals from acquisitions
301
285
16
Percentage rentals from property disposed
—
12
(12
)
$
3,138
$
2,995
$
143
41
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENTS
Expense reimbursements increased
$1.1 million
, or
3%
, in the
2017
period compared to the
2016
period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of expense reimbursements (in thousands):
2017
2016
Increase/(Decrease)
Expense reimbursements from existing properties
$
30,504
$
30,538
$
(34
)
Expense reimbursements from new development
825
49
776
Expense reimbursements from acquisitions
2,851
1,952
899
Expense reimbursements from property disposed
—
586
(586
)
$
34,180
$
33,125
$
1,055
Expense reimbursements represent the contractual recovery from tenants of certain common area maintenance ("CAM"), insurance, property tax, promotional, advertising and management expenses. Certain expense reimbursements are based on the tenant's proportionate share of the allocable operating expenses for the property. and thus generally fluctuate consistently with the related expenses. Other expense reimbursements, such as promotional, advertising and certain CAM payments, represent contractual fixed rents and may escalate each year. See "Property Operating Expenses" below for a discussion of the decrease in operating expenses from our existing properties.
MANAGEMENT, LEASING AND OTHER SERVICES
Management, leasing and other services decreased
$218,000
, or
27%
, in the
2017
period compared to the
2016
period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of management, leasing and other services (in thousands):
2017
2016
Increase/(Decrease)
Management and marketing
$
564
$
656
$
(92
)
Development and leasing
20
65
(45
)
Loan guarantee
4
85
(81
)
$
588
$
806
$
(218
)
The decrease in management, leasing and other services is primarily due to having one fewer outlet center in our unconsolidated joint ventures in the 2017 period compared to the 2016 period. During August 2016, we acquired our venture partners' equity interests in the Savannah outlet center and received no fees subsequent to the acquisition date.
OTHER INCOME
Other income decreased
$132,000
, or
5%
in the
2017
period as compared to the
2016
period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of property operating expenses (in thousands):
2017
2016
Change
Other income from existing properties
$
2,283
$
2,434
$
(151
)
Other income from new developments
34
62
(28
)
Other income from acquisitions
193
146
47
$
2,510
$
2,642
$
(132
)
42
PROPERTY OPERATING EXPENSES
The following table sets forth the changes in various components of property operating expenses (in thousands):
2017
2016
Increase/(Decrease)
Property operating expenses from existing properties
$
34,315
$
34,932
$
(617
)
Property operating expenses from new development
846
55
791
Property operating expenses from acquisitions
2,410
1,673
737
Property operating expenses from property disposed
—
782
(782
)
$
37,571
$
37,442
$
129
The decrease in property operating expenses from existing properties was due to lower spending in the 2017 period for certain CAM and marketing expenses.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
General and administrative expenses decreased
$1.2 million
, or
10%
in the
2017
period compared to the
2016
period, due primarily due to the 2016 period including executive severance.
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
Depreciation and amortization costs increased
$1.8 million
, or
6%
, in the
2017
period compared to the
2016
period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of depreciation and amortization costs from the
2017
period to the
2016
period (in thousands):
2017
2016
Increase/(Decrease)
Depreciation and amortization from existing properties
$
25,912
$
26,514
$
(602
)
Depreciation and amortization from new development
1,236
—
1,236
Depreciation and amortization from acquisitions
3,828
2,340
1,488
Depreciation and amortization from properties disposed
—
351
(351
)
$
30,976
$
29,205
$
1,771
INTEREST EXPENSE AND LOSS ON EARLY EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT
In July 2017, we completed an underwritten public offering of
$300.0 million
of
3.875%
senior notes due 2027 (the "2027 Notes"). In August 2017, we used the net proceeds from the sale of the 2027 Notes, together with borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit, to redeem all of our
6.125%
senior notes due 2020 (the "2020 Notes") (approximately
$300.0 million
in aggregate principal amount outstanding). The 2020 Notes were redeemed at par plus a make-whole premium of approximately
$34.1 million
. The loss on early extinguishment of debt includes the make-whole premium and approximately $1.5 million of costs written off related to a debt discount and the remaining net book value of deferred 2020 Notes origination costs.
Interest expense increased
$1.0 million
, or
6%
, in the
2017
period compared to the
2016
period, due primarily to the completed public offerings in August 2016 and October 2016, of an aggregate $350.0 million of 3.125% notes, the net proceeds of which were used to repay amounts outstanding under our unsecured lines of credit that had an approximate interest rate of 1.20%. Interest expense also increased due to the 30-day LIBOR interest rate, which impacts the interest rate associated with our floating rate debt, increasing in the 2017 period compared with the 2016 period and due to incremental interest paid during the redemption notice period when both the 2020 Notes and the 2027 Notes were outstanding. The overall increase was partially offset by a decrease in interest expense related to the July 2017 bond refinancing, which effectively lowered the interest rate from
6.125%
to
3.875%
on
$300.0 million
of senior notes.
43
GAIN ON PREVIOUSLY HELD INTEREST IN ACQUIRED JOINT VENTURE
In August 2016, the Savannah joint venture, which owned the outlet center in Pooler, Georgia distributed all outparcels along with $15.0 million in cash consideration to the other partner in exchange for the partner's ownership interest. We contributed the $15.0 million in cash consideration to the joint venture, which we funded with borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit. The joint venture is now wholly-owned by us and has been consolidated in our financial results since the acquisition date. As a result of acquiring the remaining interest in the Savannah joint venture, we recorded a gain of $46.3 million, which represented the difference between the carrying book value and the fair value of our previously held equity method investment in the Savannah joint venture, as a result of the significant appreciation in the property's value since the completion of its original development and opening in April 2015.
EQUITY IN EARNINGS (LOSSES) OF UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated joint ventures decreased approximately
$6.6 million
or
924%
in the
2017
period compared to the
2016
period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated joint ventures (in thousands):
2017
2016
Increase/(Decrease)
Equity in earnings (losses) from existing properties
$
(5,893
)
$
(3
)
$
(5,890
)
Equity in earnings from properties previously held in unconsolidated joint ventures
—
718
(718
)
$
(5,893
)
$
715
$
(6,608
)
Equity in earnings (losses) from existing properties includes our share of impairment charges totaling $9.0 million in the 2017 period related to the Bromont and Saint-Sauveur outlet centers in Canada, and totaling $2.9 million in the 2016 period related to the Bromont outlet center. The decrease in equity in earnings from properties previously held in unconsolidated joint ventures in 2016 is related to the Savannah joint venture. We acquired our venture partner's interest in the joint venture in August 2016 and have consolidated the results of operations of the center since the acquisition date.
Comparison of the
nine months ended
September 30, 2017
to the
nine months ended
September 30, 2016
NET INCOME
Net income decreased
$140.3 million
in the
2017
period to
$38.4 million
as compared to
$178.7 million
for the
2016
period. The majority of this decrease was due to a loss on the early extinguishment of debt of
$35.6 million
in the 2017 period, a
$95.5 million
gain on the acquisition of our partners' equity interests in the Westgate and Savannah joint ventures in the 2016 period.
In the tables below, information set forth for new development represents our Daytona Beach outlet center, which opened in November 2016. Acquisitions include our Westgate and Savannah outlet centers, which were previously held in unconsolidated joint ventures prior to acquiring our partners' interest in each venture in June 2016 and August 2016, respectively. Properties disposed include our Westbrook outlet center and Fort Myers outlet center sold in May 2017 and January 2016, respectively.
BASE RENTALS
Base rentals increased
$14.3 million
, or
6%
, in the
2017
period compared to the
2016
period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of base rentals (in thousands):
2017
2016
Change
Base rentals from existing properties
$
216,954
$
217,861
$
(907
)
Base rentals from new development
5,836
—
5,836
Base rentals from acquisitions
16,042
4,131
11,911
Base rentals from properties disposed
1,605
3,457
(1,852
)
Termination fees
2,796
3,492
(696
)
Amortization of above and below market rent adjustments, net
(1,766
)
(1,746
)
(20
)
$
241,467
$
227,195
$
14,272
44
Base rentals from existing properties decreased primarily due to a slight decrease in average portfolio occupancy.
PERCENTAGE RENTALS
Percentage rentals decreased
$673,000
, or
9%
, in the
2017
period compared to the
2016
period. Percentage rentals represents revenues based on a percentage of tenants' sales volume above predetermined levels ("contractual breakpoints") (in thousands):
2017
2016
Increase/(Decrease)
Percentage rentals from existing properties
$
5,998
$
7,129
$
(1,131
)
Percentage rentals from new development
106
—
106
Percentage rentals from acquisitions
629
285
344
Percentage rentals from properties disposed
65
57
8
$
6,798
$
7,471
$
(673
)
Decrease in percentage rentals is primarily due to a decrease in average sales per square foot for certain tenants for the rolling twelve months ended September 30, 2017, compared to the rolling twelve months ended September 30, 2016 and due to annual increases in contractual breakpoints in certain leases.
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENTS
Expense reimbursements increased
$7.7 million
, or
8%
, in the
2017
period compared to the
2016
period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of expense reimbursements (in thousands):
2017
2016
Change
Expense reimbursements from existing properties
$
93,141
$
93,296
$
(155
)
Expense reimbursements from new development
2,856
156
2,700
Expense reimbursements from acquisitions
8,052
1,952
6,100
Expense reimbursements from properties disposed
752
1,717
(965
)
$
104,801
$
97,121
$
7,680
Expense reimbursements represent the contractual recovery from tenants of certain common area maintenance, insurance, property tax, promotional, advertising and management expenses. Certain expense reimbursements are based on the tenant's proportionate share of the allocable operating expenses for the property, and thus generally fluctuate consistently with the related expenses. Other expense reimbursements, such as promotional, advertising and certain CAM payments, represent contractual fixed rents and may escalate each year. See "Property Operating Expenses" below for a discussion of the decrease in operating expenses from our existing properties.
MANAGEMENT, LEASING AND OTHER SERVICES
Management, leasing and other services decreased
$1.5 million
, or
46%
, in the
2017
period compared to the
2016
period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of management, leasing and other services (in thousands):
2017
2016
Change
Management and marketing
$
1,676
$
2,199
$
(523
)
Development and leasing
87
611
(524
)
Loan guarantee
13
449
(436
)
$
1,776
$
3,259
$
(1,483
)
The decrease in management, leasing and other services is primarily due to having two fewer outlet centers in our unconsolidated joint ventures in the 2017 period compared to the 2016 period. During 2016, we acquired our venture partners' equity interests in the Westgate and Savannah outlet centers and received no fees subsequent to the acquisition dates. Offsetting the impact of the acquisitions was the addition of one new center in an unconsolidated joint venture, the Columbus outlet center, which opened in June 2016.
45
OTHER INCOME
Other income increased
676,000
, or
11%
in the
2017
period as compared to the
2016
period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of other income (in thousands):
2017
2016
Change
Other income from existing properties
$
6,043
$
6,004
$
39
Other income from new development
148
—
148
Other income from acquisitions
613
162
451
Other income from properties disposed
101
63
38
$
6,905
$
6,229
$
676
PROPERTY OPERATING EXPENSES
Property operating expenses increased
$4.7 million
, or
4%
in the
2017
period as compared to the
2016
period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of property operating expenses (in thousands):
2017
2016
Change
Property operating expenses from existing properties
$
104,135
$
106,147
$
(2,012
)
Property operating expenses from new development
3,139
163
2,976
Property operating expenses from acquisitions
6,801
1,689
5,112
Property operating expenses from properties disposed
999
2,329
(1,330
)
$
115,074
$
110,328
$
4,746
The decrease in property operating expenses from existing properties was due to lower spending in the 2017 period for certain CAM and marketing expenses.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
General and administrative expenses decreased
$1.5 million
, or
4%
, in the
2017
period compared to the
2016
period, due primarily due to the 2016 period including executive severance.
ABANDONED PRE-DEVELOPMENT COSTS
During the 2017 period, we decided to terminate a purchase option for a pre-development stage project near Detroit, Michigan and as a result, recorded a
$528,000
charge, representing the cumulative related pre-development costs.
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
Depreciation and amortization costs increased
$13.1 million
, or
16%
, in the
2017
period compared to the
2016
period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of depreciation and amortization costs from the
2017
period to the
2016
period (in thousands):
2017
2016
Change
Depreciation and amortization expenses from existing properties
$
79,537
$
78,690
$
847
Depreciation and amortization expenses from new development
3,524
—
3,524
Depreciation and amortization expenses from acquisitions
11,437
2,340
9,097
Depreciation and amortization from properties disposed
677
1,048
(371
)
$
95,175
$
82,078
$
13,097
Depreciation and amortization increased at our existing properties due to the accelerated amortization of lease related intangibles upon store closures and demolition activities at one of our centers.
46
INTEREST EXPENSE AND LOSS ON EARLY EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT
In July 2017, we completed an underwritten public offering of
$300.0 million
of
3.875%
senior notes due 2027 (the "2027 Notes"). In August 2017, we used the net proceeds from the sale of the 2027 Notes, together with borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit, to redeem all of our
6.125%
senior notes due 2020 (the "2020 Notes") (approximately
$300.0 million
in aggregate principal amount outstanding). The 2020 Notes were redeemed at par plus a make-whole premium of approximately
$34.1 million
. The loss on early extinguishment of debt includes the make-whole premium and approximately $1.5 million of costs written off related to a debt discount and the remaining net book value of deferred 2020 Notes origination costs.
Interest expense increased
$5.3 million
, or
12%
, in the
2017
period compared to the
2016
period, primarily due to (1) the impact of converting throughout 2016 $525.0 million of debt with floating interest rates to higher fixed interest rates, (2) the 30-day LIBOR, which impacts the interest rate associated with our floating rate debt, increasing relative to its level in the 2016 period, (3) and the additional debt incurred related to the 2016 acquisitions of Westgate and Savannah.
GAIN ON SALE OF ASSETS
In May 2017, we sold our Westbrook outlet center for approximately $40.0 million, which resulted in a gain of
$6.9 million
.
GAIN ON PREVIOUSLY HELD INTEREST IN ACQUIRED JOINT VENTURE
On June 30, 2016, we completed the purchase of our venture partner's interest in the Westgate joint venture, which owned the outlet center in Glendale, Arizona, for a total cash price of approximately $40.9 million. The purchase was funded with borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit. Prior to the transaction, we owned a 58% interest in the Westgate joint venture since its formation in 2012 and accounted for it under the equity method of accounting. The joint venture is now wholly-owned and is consolidated in our financial results as of June 30, 2016. As a result of acquiring the remaining interest in the Westgate joint venture, we recorded a gain of $49.3 million, which represented the difference between the carrying book value and the fair value of our previously held equity method investment in the joint venture, as a result of the significant appreciation in the property's value since the completion of its original development and opening.
In August 2016, the Savannah joint venture, which owned the outlet center in Pooler, Georgia distributed all outparcels along with $15.0 million in cash consideration to the other partner in exchange for the partner's ownership interest. We contributed the $15.0 million in cash consideration to the joint venture, which we funded with borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit. The joint venture is now wholly-owned by us and has been consolidated in our financial results since the acquisition date. As a result of acquiring the remaining interest in the Savannah joint venture, we recorded a gain of $46.3 million, which represented the difference between the carrying book value and the fair value of our previously held equity method investment in the Savannah joint venture, as a result of the significant appreciation in the property's value since the completion of its original development and opening in April 2015.
EQUITY IN EARNINGS (LOSSES) OF UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated joint ventures decreased approximately
$8.9 million
or
116%
in the
2017
period compared to the
2016
period. The following table sets forth the changes in various components of equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated joint ventures (in thousands):
2017
2016
Change
Equity in earnings (losses) from existing properties
$
(2,293
)
$
3,671
$
(5,964
)
Equity in earnings from new development
1,092
366
726
Equity in earnings from properties previously held in unconsolidated joint ventures
—
3,643
(3,643
)
$
(1,201
)
$
7,680
$
(8,881
)
Equity in earnings (losses) from existing properties includes our share of impairment charges totaling $9.0 million in the 2017 period related to the Bromont and Saint-Sauveur outlet centers in Canada, and totaling $2.9 million in the 2016 period related to the Bromont outlet center. . The increase in equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures from new development is due to the incremental earnings from the Columbus outlet center, which opened in June 2016. The decrease in equity in earnings (losses) from properties previously held in unconsolidated joint ventures in 2016 is related to the Westgate and Savannah joint ventures. We acquired our venture partners' interest in each of these joint ventures in June 2016 and August 2016, respectively, and have consolidated the results of operations of these centers since the respective acquisition date.
47
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES OF THE COMPANY
In this "Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Company" section, the term "the Company" refers only to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. on an unconsolidated basis, excluding the Operating Partnership.
The Company's business is operated primarily through the Operating Partnership. The Company issues public equity from time to time, but does not otherwise generate any capital itself or conduct any business itself, other than incurring certain expenses in operating as a public company, which are fully reimbursed by the Operating Partnership. The Company does not hold any indebtedness, and its only material asset is its ownership of partnership interests of the Operating Partnership. The Company's principal funding requirement is the payment of dividends on its common shares. The Company's principal source of funding for its dividend payments is distributions it receives from the Operating Partnership.
Through its ownership of the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, the Company has the full, exclusive and complete responsibility for the Operating Partnership's day-to-day management and control. The Company causes the Operating Partnership to distribute all, or such portion as the Company may in its discretion determine, of its available cash in the manner provided in the Operating Partnership's partnership agreement. The Company receives proceeds from equity issuances from time to time, but is required by the Operating Partnership's partnership agreement to contribute the proceeds from its equity issuances to the Operating Partnership in exchange for partnership units of the Operating Partnership.
The Company is a well-known seasoned issuer with a shelf registration that expires in June 2018 that allows the Company to register unspecified various classes of equity securities and the Operating Partnership to register unspecified, various classes of debt securities. As circumstances warrant, the Company may issue equity from time to time on an opportunistic basis, dependent upon market conditions and available pricing. The Operating Partnership may use the proceeds to repay debt, including borrowings under its lines of credit, to develop new or existing properties, to make acquisitions of properties or portfolios of properties, to invest in existing or newly created joint ventures or for general corporate purposes.
The liquidity of the Company is dependent on the Operating Partnership's ability to make sufficient distributions to the Company. The Company also guarantees some of the Operating Partnership's debt. If the Operating Partnership fails to fulfill its debt requirements, which trigger the Company's guarantee obligations, then the Company may be required to fulfill its cash payment commitments under such guarantees. However, the Company's only material asset is its investment in the Operating Partnership.
The Company believes the Operating Partnership's sources of working capital, specifically its cash flow from operations, and borrowings available under its unsecured lines of credit, are adequate for it to make its distribution payments to the Company and, in turn, for the Company to make its dividend payments to its shareholders. However, there can be no assurance that the Operating Partnership's sources of capital will continue to be available at all or in amounts sufficient to meet its needs, including its ability to make distribution payments to the Company. The unavailability of capital could adversely affect the Operating Partnership's ability to pay its distributions to the Company which will, in turn, adversely affect the Company's ability to pay cash dividends to its shareholders.
For the Company to maintain its qualification as a REIT, it must pay dividends to its shareholders aggregating annually at least 90% of its taxable income (excluding capital gains). While historically the Company has satisfied this distribution requirement by making cash distributions to its shareholders, it may choose to satisfy this requirement by making distributions of cash or other property, including, in limited circumstances, the Company's own shares.
As a result of this distribution requirement, the Operating Partnership cannot rely on retained earnings to fund its on-going operations to the same extent that other companies whose parent companies are not real estate investment trusts can. The Company may need to continue to raise capital in the equity markets to fund the Operating Partnership's working capital needs, as well as potential new developments, expansions and renovations of existing properties, acquisitions, or investments in existing or newly created joint ventures.
48
The Company currently consolidates the Operating Partnership because it has (1) the power to direct the activities of the Operating Partnership that most significantly impact the Operating Partnership’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses and the right to receive the residual returns of the Operating Partnership that could be potentially significant. The Company does not have significant assets other than its investment in the Operating Partnership. Therefore, the assets and liabilities and the revenues and expenses of the Company and the Operating Partnership are the same on their respective financial statements, except for immaterial differences related to cash, other assets and accrued liabilities that arise from public company expenses paid by the Company. However, all debt is held directly or indirectly at the Operating Partnership level, and the Company has guaranteed some of the Operating Partnership's unsecured debt as discussed below. Because the Company consolidates the Operating Partnership, the section entitled "Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Operating Partnership" should be read in conjunction with this section to understand the liquidity and capital resources of the Company on a consolidated basis and how the Company is operated as a whole.
In May 2017, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to
$125.0 million
of our outstanding common shares as market conditions warrant over a period commencing on May 19, 2017 and expiring on May 18, 2019. Repurchases may be made through open market, privately-negotiated, structured or derivative transactions (including accelerated share repurchase transactions), or other methods of acquiring shares. The Company intends to structure open market purchases to occur within pricing and volume requirements of Rule 10b-18. The Company may, from time to time, enter into Rule 10b5-1 plans to facilitate the repurchase of its shares under this authorization.
Between May 19, 2017 and August 25, 2017 we repurchased approximately
1.9 million
common shares on the open market at an average price of
$25.80
, totaling approximately
$49.3 million
exclusive of commissions and related fees. The remaining amount authorized to be repurchased under the program as of September 30, 2017 was approximately
$75.7 million
.
In October 2017, the Company's Board of Directors declared a
$0.3425
cash dividend per common share payable on November 15, 2017 to each shareholder of record on October 31, 2017, and the Trustees of Tanger GP Trust declared a
$0.3425
cash distribution per Operating Partnership unit to the Operating Partnership's unitholders.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES OF THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP
General Overview
In this "Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Operating Partnership" section, the terms "we", "our" and "us" refer to the Operating Partnership or the Operating Partnership and the Company together, as the text requires.
Property rental income represents our primary source to pay property operating expenses, debt service, distributions and capital expenditures needed to maintain our properties. To the extent that our cash flow from operating activities is insufficient to cover our capital needs, including new developments, expansions of existing outlet centers, acquisitions and investments in unconsolidated joint ventures, we finance such activities from borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit or from the proceeds from the Operating Partnership's debt offerings and the Company's equity offerings.
We believe we achieve a strong and flexible financial position by attempting to: (1) maintain a conservative leverage position relative to our portfolio when pursuing new development, expansion and acquisition opportunities, (2) extend and sequence debt maturities, (3) manage our interest rate risk through a proper mix of fixed and variable rate debt, (4) maintain access to liquidity by using our unsecured lines of credit in a conservative manner and (5) preserve internally generated sources of capital by strategically divesting of underperforming assets and maintaining a conservative distribution payout ratio. We manage our capital structure to reflect a long term investment approach and utilize multiple sources of capital to meet our requirements.
49
The following table sets forth our changes in cash flows (in thousands):
Nine months ended September 30,
2017
2016
Change
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
181,530
$
177,723
$
3,807
Net cash used in investing activities
(89,052
)
(39,490
)
(49,562
)
Net cash used in financing activities
(95,954
)
(134,464
)
38,510
Effect of foreign currency rate changes on cash and equivalents
(54
)
532
(586
)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
$
(3,530
)
$
4,301
$
(7,831
)
Operating Activities
The increase in net cash provided by operating activities in the 2017 period compared to the 2016 period was primarily due to incremental operating income as a result of the acquisition of our venture partners' interest in our Westgate and Savannah outlet centers, previously held in unconsolidated joint ventures, in June 2016 and August 2016, respectively, and the opening of our newest wholly owned outlet center in Daytona Beach, FL, which opened in November 2016.
Investing Activities
The primary cause for the increase in net cash used in investing activities was due to the change in restricted cash of
$118.4 million
. In the 2016 period, we used restricted cash, which represented a portion of the proceeds received from certain assets sales in 2015, to pay a portion of our $150.0 million floating rate mortgage loan, which had an original maturity date in August 2018, and our $28.4 million deferred financing obligation, both of which related to our Deer Park outlet center. Partially offsetting the increase in cash used in the 2017 period compared to the 2016 period was the cash used to acquire our venture partners' interest in our Westgate joint venture and Savannah joint venture in the 2016 period.
Financing Activities
The primary cause for the decrease in net cash used in financing activities is due to the incremental borrowings required to fund the Company's development needs, net of asset sales proceeds, in the 2017 period compared to the 2016 period. A significant portion of the 2016 development needs was funded with the $118.4 million held in restricted cash during that period. In addition, cash used was higher in the 2016 period compared to the 2017 period due to a special dividend of approximately $21.0 million that was paid during 2016.
50
Capital Expenditures
The following table details our capital expenditures (in thousands):
Nine months ended September 30,
2017
2016
Change
Capital expenditures analysis:
New center developments
$
87,376
$
74,441
$
12,935
Major center renovations
13,813
13,908
(95
)
Second generation tenant allowances
15,815
6,963
8,852
Other capital expenditures
19,791
8,576
11,215
136,795
103,888
32,907
Conversion from accrual to cash basis
(4,183
)
8,325
(12,508
)
Additions to rental property-cash basis
$
132,612
$
112,213
$
20,399
•
New center development expenditures, which include first generation tenant allowances, relate to construction expenditures for our Fort Worth, Daytona Beach, Lancaster and Tilton outlet centers in the 2017 period. The 2016 period included new center development expenditures for our Daytona Beach, Fort Worth, Southaven, and San Marcos outlet centers.
•
Major center renovations in both the 2017 and 2016 periods included construction activities at our Riverhead and our Rehoboth Beach outlet centers. The 2016 period also included renovations at our Howell outlet center while the 2017 period also included renovations at our Myrtle Beach 17 outlet center. We expect to spend approximately $7.7 million for the remainder of 2017 to complete our current renovation projects.
•
The increase in other capital expenditures in the 2017 period is primarily due to the installation of solar panels at several of our outlet centers and tenant interior build outs.
Current Developments
We intend to continue to grow our portfolio by developing, expanding or acquiring additional outlet centers. In the section below, we describe the new developments that are either currently planned, underway or recently completed. However, you should note that any developments or expansions that we, or a joint venture that we have an ownership interest in, have planned or anticipated may not be started or completed as scheduled, or may not result in accretive net income or funds from operations ("FFO"). See the section "Non-GAAP Supplemental Earnings Measures" - "Funds From Operations" below for further discussion of FFO.
In addition, we regularly evaluate acquisition or disposition proposals and engage from time to time in negotiations for acquisitions or dispositions of properties. We may also enter into letters of intent for the purchase or sale of properties. Any prospective acquisition or disposition that is being evaluated or which is subject to a letter of intent may not be consummated, or if consummated, may not result in an increase in earnings or liquidity.
New Development of Consolidated Outlet Centers
The following table summarizes our projects under development as of
September 30, 2017
:
Project
Approximate square feet
(in 000's)
Projected Total Net Cost per Square Foot
(in dollars)
Projected Total Net Cost
(in millions)
Costs Incurred to Date
(in millions)
Projected Opening
New development:
Fort Worth
352
$
256
$
90.2
$
74.7
October 2017
51
Lancaster Expansion
In September 2017, we opened a
123,000
square foot expansion of our outlet center in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
Fort Worth
In October 2017, we opened a
352,000
square foot wholly-owned outlet center center in the greater Fort Worth, Texas area. The outlet center is located within the 279-acre Champions Circle mixed-use development adjacent to Texas Motor Speedway.
Other Potential Future Developments
As of the date of this filing, we are in the initial study period for potential new developments. We may also use joint venture arrangements to develop other potential sites. There can be no assurance, however, that these potential future projects will ultimately be developed.
In the case of projects to be wholly-owned by us, we expect to fund these projects from amounts available under our unsecured lines of credit, but may also fund them with capital from additional public debt and equity offerings. For projects to be developed through joint venture arrangements, we may use collateralized construction loans to fund a portion of the project, with our share of the equity requirements funded from sources described above. See “Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” for a discussion of unconsolidated joint venture development activities.
Financing Arrangements
As of
September 30, 2017
, unsecured borrowings represented
91%
of our outstanding debt and
89%
of the gross book value of our real estate portfolio was unencumbered. We maintain unsecured lines of credit that provide for borrowings of up to $520.0 million. The unsecured lines of credit include a
$20.0 million
liquidity line and a
$500.0 million
syndicated line. Our unsecured lines of credit bear interest at a rate of LIBOR + 0.90% and the syndicated line may be increased up to
$1.0 billion
through an accordion feature in certain circumstances. The unsecured lines of credit have an expiration date of October 24, 2019 with an option for a one year extension. The Company guarantees the Operating Partnership's obligations under these lines. As of
September 30, 2017
, we had
$366.3 million
available under our unsecured lines of credit after taking into account outstanding letters of credit of
$5.5 million
.
In July 2017, we completed an underwritten public offering of
$300.0 million
of our
3.875%
senior notes due 2027 (the "2027 Notes"). The 2027 Notes priced at
99.579%
of the principal amount to yield
3.926%
to maturity. The 2027 Notes pay interest semi-annually at a rate of
3.875%
per annum and mature on July 15, 2027. The estimated net proceeds from the offering, after deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses, were approximately
$295.9 million
. In August 2017, we used the net proceeds from the sale of the 2027 Notes, together with borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit, to redeem all of our
6.125%
senior notes due 2020 (the "2020 Notes") (approximately
$300.0 million
in aggregate principal amount outstanding). The 2020 Notes were redeemed at par plus a “make-whole” premium of approximately
$34.1 million
.
Subsequent to quarter end, we successfully settled litigation with the estate of our former partner in the Foxwoods, Connecticut joint venture. In return for mutual releases and no cash consideration, the estate tendered its partnership interest to the Company. Prior to this settlement, we had a
100%
economic interest in the consolidated joint venture as a result of our preferred equity interest and the capital and distribution provisions in the joint venture agreement. On November 3, 2017, Tanger repaid the
$70.3 million
floating rate mortgage loan secured by the property with borrowings under its unsecured floating rate lines of credit.
We intend to retain the ability to raise additional capital, including public debt or equity, to pursue attractive investment opportunities that may arise and to otherwise act in a manner that we believe to be in the best interests of our shareholders and unitholders. The Company is a well-known seasoned issuer with a joint shelf registration with the Operating Partnership, expiring in June 2018, that allows us to register unspecified amounts of different classes of securities on Form S-3. To generate capital to reinvest into other attractive investment opportunities, we may also consider the use of additional operational and developmental joint ventures, the sale or lease of outparcels on our existing properties and the sale of certain properties that do not meet our long-term investment criteria. Based on cash provided by operations, existing lines of credit, ongoing relationships with certain financial institutions and our ability to sell debt or issue equity subject to market conditions, we believe that we have access to the necessary financing to fund the planned capital expenditures through the end of 2018.
52
We anticipate that adequate cash will be available to fund our operating and administrative expenses, regular debt service obligations, and the payment of dividends in accordance with REIT requirements in both the short and long-term. Although we receive most of our rental payments on a monthly basis, distributions to shareholders and unitholders are made quarterly and interest payments on the senior, unsecured notes are made semi-annually. Amounts accumulated for such payments will be used in the interim to reduce the outstanding borrowings under our existing unsecured lines of credit or invested in short-term money market or other suitable instruments.
We believe our current balance sheet position is financially sound; however, due to the uncertainty and unpredictability of the capital and credit markets, we can give no assurance that affordable access to capital will exist between now and when our next significant debt maturity, which are our unsecured line of credit facilities, occurs in 2020 assuming the extension option is exercised.
The Operating Partnership's debt agreements require the maintenance of certain ratios, including debt service coverage and leverage, and limit the payment of dividends such that dividends and distributions will not exceed funds from operations, as defined in the agreements, for the prior fiscal year on an annual basis or 95% on a cumulative basis. We have historically been and currently are in compliance with all of our debt covenants. We expect to remain in compliance with all of our existing debt covenants; however, should circumstances arise that would cause us to be in default, the various lenders would have the ability to accelerate the maturity on our outstanding debt.
We believe our most restrictive covenants are contained in our senior, unsecured notes. Key financial covenants and their covenant levels, which are calculated based on contractual terms, include the following:
Senior unsecured notes financial covenants
Required
Actual
Total consolidated debt to adjusted total assets
<60%
52
%
Total secured debt to adjusted total assets
<40%
5
%
Total unencumbered assets to unsecured debt
>150%
184
%
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The following table details certain information as of
September 30, 2017
about various unconsolidated real estate joint ventures in which we have an ownership interest:
Joint Venture
Outlet Center Location
Ownership %
Square Feet
(in 000's)
Carrying Value of Investment (in millions)
Columbus
Columbus, OH
50.0
%
355
$
6.8
National Harbor
National Harbor, MD
50.0
%
341
2.4
RioCan Canada
Various
50.0
%
924
116.6
Investments included in total assets
$
125.8
Charlotte
(1)
Charlotte, NC
50.0
%
398
$
(3.6
)
Galveston/Houston
(1)
Texas City, TX
50.0
%
353
(12.5
)
Investments included in other liabilities
$
(16.1
)
(1)
The negative carrying value is due to the distributions of proceeds from mortgage loans and quarterly distributions of excess cash flow exceeding the original contributions from the partners.
Our joint ventures are generally subject to buy-sell provisions which are customary for joint venture agreements in the real estate industry. Either partner may initiate these provisions (subject to any applicable lock up period), which could result in either the sale of our interest or the use of available cash or additional borrowings to acquire the other party's interest. Under these provisions, one partner sets a price for the property, then the other partner has the option to either (1) purchase their partner's interest based on that price or (2) sell its interest to the other partner based on that price. Since the partner other than the partner who triggers the provision has the option to be the buyer or seller, we don't consider this arrangement to be a mandatory redeemable obligation.
53
We provide guarantees to lenders for our joint ventures which include standard non-recourse carve out indemnifications for losses arising from items such as but not limited to fraud, physical waste, payment of taxes, environmental indemnities, misapplication of insurance proceeds or security deposits and failure to maintain required insurance. For construction and term loans, we may include a guaranty of completion as well as a principal guaranty ranging from 5% to 100% of principal. The principal guarantees include terms for release based upon satisfactory completion of construction and performance targets including occupancy thresholds and minimum debt service coverage tests. Our joint ventures may contain make whole provisions in the event that demands are made on any existing guarantees.
Debt of unconsolidated joint ventures
The following table details information regarding the outstanding debt of the unconsolidated joint ventures and principal guarantees of such debt provided by us as of
September 30, 2017
(dollars in millions):
Joint Venture
Total Joint
Venture Debt
Maturity Date
Interest Rate
Percent Guaranteed by the Operating Partnership
Maximum Guaranteed Amount by the Company
Charlotte
$
90.0
November 2018
LIBOR + 1.45%
5.0
%
$
4.5
Columbus
85.0
November 2019
LIBOR + 1.65%
7.5
%
6.4
Galveston/Houston
(1)
80.0
July 2020
LIBOR + 1.65%
12.5
%
10.0
National Harbor
(2)
87.0
November 2019
LIBOR + 1.65%
10.0
%
8.7
RioCan Canada
(3)
11.4
May 2020
5.75%
28.1
%
3.2
Debt origination costs
(2.0
)
$
351.4
$
32.8
(1)
In July, the joint venture amended and restated the initial construction loan to increase the amount available to borrow from
$70.0 million
to
$80.0 million
and extended the maturity date until July 2020 with
two
one
-year options. The amended and restated loan also changed the interest rate from LIBOR +
1.50%
to an interest rate of LIBOR +
1.65%
. At the closing of the amendment, the joint venture distributed approximately
$14.5 million
equally between the partners.
(2)
100% completion guaranty; 10% principal guaranty.
(3)
The joint venture debt amount includes premium of approximately
$405,000
.
Fees from unconsolidated joint ventures
Fees we received for various services provided to our unconsolidated joint ventures were recognized in other income as follows (in thousands):
Three months ended
Nine months ended
September 30,
September 30,
2017
2016
2017
2016
Fee:
Management and marketing
$
564
$
656
1,676
2,199
Development and leasing
20
65
$
87
$
611
Loan Guarantee
4
85
13
449
Total Fees
$
588
$
806
$
1,776
$
3,259
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Refer to our
2016
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company and the Operating Partnership for a discussion of our critical accounting policies which include principles of consolidation, acquisition of real estate, cost capitalization, impairment of long-lived assets and revenue recognition. There have been no material changes to these policies in
2017
.
54
NON-GAAP SUPPLEMENTAL MEASURES
Funds From Operations
Funds From Operations ("FFO") is a widely used measure of the operating performance for real estate companies that supplements net income (loss) determined in accordance with GAAP. We determine FFO based on the definition set forth by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT"), of which we are a member. FFO represents net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP) before extraordinary items and gains (losses) on sale or disposal of depreciable operating properties, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, impairment losses on depreciable real estate of consolidated real estate and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures, including depreciation and amortization, and impairment losses on investments in unconsolidated joint ventures driven by a measurable decrease in the fair value of depreciable real estate held by the unconsolidated joint ventures.
FFO is intended to exclude historical cost depreciation of real estate as required by GAAP which assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes ratably over time. Historically, however, real estate values have risen or fallen with market conditions. Because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, gains and losses from property dispositions and extraordinary items, it provides a performance measure that, when compared year over year, reflects the impact to operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, development activities and interest costs, providing perspective not immediately apparent from net income.
We present FFO because we consider it an important supplemental measure of our operating performance. In addition, a portion of cash bonus compensation to certain members of management is based on our FFO or Adjusted Funds From Operations ("AFFO"), which is described in the section below. We believe it is useful for investors to have enhanced transparency into how we evaluate our performance and that of our management. In addition, FFO is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of REITs, many of which present FFO when reporting their results. FFO is also widely used by us and others in our industry to evaluate and price potential acquisition candidates. NAREIT has encouraged its member companies to report their FFO as a supplemental, industry-wide standard measure of REIT operating performance.
FFO has significant limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:
•
FFO does not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements, for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;
•
FFO does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;
•
Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and FFO does not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements;
•
FFO, which includes discontinued operations, may not be indicative of our ongoing operations; and
•
Other companies in our industry may calculate FFO differently than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure.
Because of these limitations, FFO should not be considered as a measure of discretionary cash available to us to invest in the growth of our business or our dividend paying capacity. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using FFO only as a supplemental measure.
55
Adjusted Funds From Operations
We present AFFO as a supplemental measure of our performance. We define AFFO as FFO further adjusted to eliminate the impact of certain items that we do not consider indicative of our ongoing operating performance. These further adjustments are itemized in the table below. You are encouraged to evaluate these adjustments and the reasons we consider them appropriate for supplemental analysis. In evaluating AFFO you should be aware that in the future we may incur expenses that are the same as or similar to some of the adjustments in this presentation. Our presentation of AFFO should not be construed as an inference that our future results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring items.
We present AFFO because we believe it assists investors and analysts in comparing our performance across reporting periods on a consistent basis by excluding items that we do not believe are indicative of our core operating performance. In addition, we believe it is useful for investors to have enhanced transparency into how we evaluate management’s performance and the effectiveness of our business strategies. We use AFFO when certain material, unplanned transactions occur as a factor in evaluating management's performance and to evaluate the effectiveness of our business strategies, and may use AFFO when determining incentive compensation.
AFFO has limitations as an analytical tool. Some of these limitations are:
•
AFFO does not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements, for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;
•
AFFO does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;
•
Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and AFFO does not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements;
•
AFFO does not reflect the impact of certain cash charges resulting from matters we consider not to be indicative of our ongoing operations; and
•
Other companies in our industry may calculate AFFO differently than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure.
Because of these limitations, AFFO should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using AFFO only as a supplemental measure.
56
Below is a reconciliation of net income to FFO available to common shareholders and AFFO available to common shareholders (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Three months ended
Nine months ended
September 30,
September 30,
2017
2016
2017
2016
Net income (loss)
$
(16,034
)
$
72,774
$
38,427
$
178,693
Adjusted for:
Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets - consolidated
30,396
28,850
93,634
80,992
Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets - unconsolidated joint ventures
3,583
4,325
10,971
15,472
Impairment charges - unconsolidated joint ventures
9,021
2,919
9,021
2,919
Gain on sale of assets
—
—
(6,943
)
(4,887
)
Gain on previously held interests in acquired joint ventures
—
(46,258
)
—
(95,516
)
FFO
26,966
62,610
145,110
177,673
FFO attributable to noncontrolling interests in other consolidated partnerships
—
(3
)
—
(62
)
Allocation of earnings to participating securities
(306
)
(539
)
(1,346
)
(1,675
)
FFO available to common shareholders
(1)
$
26,660
$
62,068
$
143,764
$
175,936
As further adjusted for:
Compensation related to director and executive officer terminations
(2)
—
887
—
1,180
Acquisition costs
—
487
—
487
Demolition costs
—
259
—
441
Gain on sale of outparcel
—
(1,418
)
—
(1,418
)
Abandoned pre-development costs
(99
)
—
528
—
Make-whole premium due to early extinguishment of debt
(3)
34,143
—
34,143
—
Write-off of debt discount and debt origination costs due to early extinguishment of debt
(3)
1,483
—
1,483
882
Impact of above adjustments to the allocation of earnings to participating securities
(249
)
(2
)
(254
)
(15
)
AFFO available to common shareholders
(1)
$
61,938
$
62,281
$
179,664
$
177,493
FFO available to common shareholders per share - diluted
(1)
$
0.27
$
0.62
$
1.44
$
1.75
AFFO available to common shareholders per share - diluted
(1)
$
0.63
$
0.62
$
1.80
$
1.76
Weighted Average Shares:
Basic weighted average common shares
93,923
95,156
94,781
95,075
Effect of notional units
—
426
—
393
Effect of outstanding options and restricted common shares
—
90
23
68
Diluted weighted average common shares (for earnings per share computations)
93,923
95,672
94,804
95,536
Exchangeable operating partnership units
5,028
5,053
5,028
5,053
Diluted weighted average common shares (for FFO and AFFO per share computations)
(1)
98,951
100,725
99,832
100,589
(1)
Assumes the Class A common limited partnership units of the Operating Partnership held by the noncontrolling interests are exchanged for common shares of the Company. Each Class A common limited partnership unit is exchangeable for one of the Company's common shares, subject to certain limitations to preserve the Company's REIT status.
(2)
Represents cash severance and accelerated vesting of restricted shares associated with the departure of an officer in August 2016 and the accelerated vesting of restricted shares due to the death of a director in February 2016.
(3)
Due to charges related to the redemption of our
$300.0 million
6.125%
senior notes due 2020 and the January 28, 2016 early repayment of the $150.0 million mortgage secured by the Deer Park property, which was scheduled to mature August 30, 2018.
57
Portfolio Net Operating Income and Same Center NOI
We present portfolio net operating income ("Portfolio NOI") and same center net operating income ("Same Center NOI") as supplemental measures of our operating performance. Portfolio NOI represents our property level net operating income which is defined as total operating revenues less property operating expenses and excludes termination fees and non-cash adjustments including straight-line rent, net above and below market rent amortization and gains or losses on the sale of outparcels recognized during the periods presented. We define Same Center NOI as Portfolio NOI for the properties that were operational for the entire portion of both comparable reporting periods and which were not acquired or subject to a material expansion or non-recurring event, such as a natural disaster, during the comparable reporting periods.
We believe Portfolio NOI and Same Center NOI are non-GAAP metrics used by industry analysts, investors and management to measure the operating performance of our properties because they provide performance measures directly related to the revenues and expenses involved in owning and operating real estate assets and provide a perspective not immediately apparent from net income, FFO or AFFO. Because Same Center NOI excludes properties developed, redeveloped, acquired and sold; as well as non-cash adjustments, gains or losses on the sale of outparcels and termination rents; it highlights operating trends such as occupancy levels, rental rates and operating costs on properties that were operational for both comparable periods. Other REITs may use different methodologies for calculating Portfolio NOI and Same Center NOI, and accordingly, our Portfolio NOI and Same Center NOI may not be comparable to other REITs.
Portfolio NOI and Same Center NOI should not be considered alternatives to net income (loss) or as an indicator of our financial performance since they do not reflect the entire operations of our portfolio, nor do they reflect the impact of general and administrative expenses, acquisition-related expenses, interest expense, depreciation and amortization costs, other non-property income and losses, the level of capital expenditures and leasing costs necessary to maintain the operating performance of our properties, or trends in development and construction activities which are significant economic costs and activities that could materially impact our results from operations. Because of these limitations, Portfolio NOI and Same Center NOI should not be viewed in isolation or as a substitute for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using Portfolio NOI and Same Center NOI only as supplemental measures.
58
Below is a reconciliation of net income to Portfolio NOI and Same Center NOI for the consolidated portfolio (in thousands):
Three months ended
Nine months ended
September 30,
September 30,
2017
2016
2017
2016
Net income (loss)
$
(16,034
)
$
72,774
$
38,427
$
178,693
Adjusted to exclude:
Equity in (earnings) losses of unconsolidated joint ventures
5,893
(715
)
1,201
(7,680
)
Interest expense
16,489
15,516
49,496
44,200
Gain on sale of assets
—
(1,418
)
(6,943
)
(6,305
)
Gain on previously held interests in acquired joint ventures
—
(46,258
)
—
(95,516
)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
35,626
—
35,626
—
Other non-operating (income) expense
(591
)
(24
)
(683
)
(378
)
Depreciation and amortization
30,976
29,205
95,175
82,078
Other non-property (income) expenses
372
(47
)
993
(437
)
Abandoned pre-development costs
(99
)
—
528
—
Acquisition costs
—
487
—
487
Demolition Costs
—
259
—
441
Corporate general and administrative expenses
11,020
12,076
33,499
34,989
Non-cash adjustments
(1)
(1,020
)
(967
)
(2,580
)
(2,938
)
Termination rents
(162
)
(1,450
)
(2,796
)
(3,491
)
Portfolio NOI
82,470
79,438
241,943
224,143
Non-same center NOI
(2)
(9,813
)
(7,320
)
(29,643
)
(13,514
)
Same Center NOI
$
72,657
$
72,118
$
212,300
$
210,629
(1)
Non-cash items include straight-line rent, net above and below market rent amortization and gains or losses on outparcel sales, as applicable.
(2)
Excluded from Same Center NOI:
Outlet centers opened:
Outlet centers sold:
Outlet centers acquired:
Outlet center expansions:
Daytona Beach
November 2016
Fort Myers
January 2016
Glendale (Westgate)
June 2016
Lancaster
September 2017
Westbrook
May 2017
Savannah
August 2016
59
ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND OUTLOOK
The majority of our leases contain provisions designed to mitigate the impact of inflation. Such provisions include clauses for the escalation of base rent and clauses enabling us to receive percentage rentals based on tenants' gross sales (above predetermined levels) which generally increase as prices rise. A component of most leases includes a pro-rata share or escalating fixed contributions by the tenant for property operating expenses, including common area maintenance, real estate taxes, insurance and advertising and promotion, thereby reducing exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation.
The current challenging retail environment could impact our business in the short-term as our operations are subject to the results of operations of our retail tenants. A portion of our rental revenues are derived from percentage rents that directly depend on the sales volume of certain tenants. Accordingly, declines in these tenants' results of operations would reduce the income produced by our properties. If the sales or profitability of our retail tenants decline sufficiently, whether due to a change in consumer preferences, legislative changes that increase the cost of their operations or otherwise, such tenants maybe unable to pay their existing rents as such rents would represent a higher percentage of their sales. While we believe outlet stores will continue to be a profitable and fundamental distribution channel for many brand name manufacturers, some retail formats are more successful than others. As typical in the retail industry, certain tenants have closed, or will close, certain stores by terminating their lease prior to its natural expiration or as a result of filing for protection under bankruptcy laws, or may request modifications to their existing lease terms.
Due to the relatively short-term nature of our tenants' leases, a significant portion of the leases in our portfolio come up for renewal each year. As of January 1,
2017
, excluding the Westbrook outlet center, which was sold in the second quarter of 2017, we had approximately
1.5 million
square feet, or
12%
of our consolidated portfolio at that time, coming up for renewal during
2017
. As of September 30, 2017, we had renewed approximately
78%
of this space. In addition, for the rolling twelve months ended September 30, 2017, we completed renewals and re-tenanted space totaling 1.5 million square feet at a blended
11.8%
increase in average base rental rates compared to the expiring rates. While we continue to attract and retain additional tenants, there can be no assurance that we can achieve similar base rental rates. In addition, if we were unable to successfully renew or re-lease a significant amount of this space on favorable economic terms, the loss in rent could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Our outlet centers typically include well-known, national, brand name companies. By maintaining a broad base of well-known tenants and a geographically diverse portfolio of properties located across the United States, we believe we reduce our operating and leasing risks. No one tenant (including affiliates) accounts for more than
8%
of our square feet or
7%
of our combined base and percentage rental revenues. Accordingly, although we can give no assurance, we do not expect any material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition as a result of leases to be renewed or stores to be re-leased. Occupancy at our consolidated centers was
97%
as of
September 30, 2017
and
2016
.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market Risk
We are exposed to various market risks, including changes in interest rates. Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates. We may periodically enter into certain interest rate protection and interest rate swap agreements to effectively convert existing floating rate debt to a fixed rate basis. We do not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We are also exposed to foreign currency risk on investments in outlet centers that are located in Canada. Our currency exposure is concentrated in the Canadian Dollar. To mitigate some of the risk related to changes in foreign currency, cash flows received from our Canadian joint ventures are either reinvested to fund ongoing Canadian development activities, if applicable, or converted to US dollars and utilized to repay amounts outstanding under our unsecured lines of credit. We generally do not hedge currency translation exposures.
60
In April 2016, we entered into
four
separate interest rate swap agreements, effective April 13, 2016 that fix the base LIBOR rate at an average of
1.03%
on notional amounts totaling
$175.0 million
through January 1, 2021. In addition, in October 2013, we entered into interest rate swap agreements with notional amounts totaling $150.0 million to reduce our floating rate debt exposure. The interest rate swap agreements fix the base LIBOR rate at an average of 1.30% and mature in August 2018. The fair value of the interest rate swap agreements represents the estimated receipts or payments that would be made to terminate the agreement. As of
September 30, 2017
, the fair value of these contracts is an asset of
$4.2 million
. The fair value is based on dealer quotes, considering current interest rates, remaining term to maturity and our credit standing.
As of
September 30, 2017
,
16%
of our outstanding debt, excluding variable rate debt with interest rate protection agreements in place, had variable interest rates and therefore were subject to market fluctuations. An increase in the LIBOR index of 100 basis points would result in an increase of approximately
$2.8 million
in interest expense on an annual basis. The information presented herein is merely an estimate and has limited predictive value. As a result, the ultimate effect upon our operating results of interest rate fluctuations will depend on the interest rate exposures that arise during the period, our hedging strategies at that time and future changes in the level of interest rates.
The estimated fair value and recorded value of our debt consisting of senior unsecured notes, unsecured term loans, secured mortgages and unsecured lines of credit were as follows (in thousands):
September 30, 2017
December 31, 2016
Fair value of debt
$
1,801,655
$
1,704,644
Recorded value of debt
$
1,773,981
$
1,687,866
A 100 basis point increase from prevailing interest rates at
September 30, 2017
and December 31,
2016
would result in a decrease in fair value of total debt of approximately
$80.9 million
and
$69.1 million
, respectively. Refer to Note
9
to the consolidated financial statements for a description of our methodology in calculating the estimated fair value of debt. Considerable judgment is necessary to develop estimated fair values of financial instruments. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize on the disposition of the financial instruments.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. Controls and Procedures
The Company's management carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of
September 30, 2017
. Based on this evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have concluded the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
September 30, 2017
. There were no changes to the Company's internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended
September 30, 2017
, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Tanger Properties Limited Partnership Controls and Procedures
The management of the Operating Partnership's general partner carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Vice-President and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Operating Partnership's general partner of the effectiveness of the Operating Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of
September 30, 2017
. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer of the Operating Partnership's general partner, and the Vice-President and Treasurer of the Operating Partnership's general partner, have concluded the Operating Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
September 30, 2017
. There were no changes to the Operating Partnership's internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended
September 30, 2017
, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Operating Partnership's internal control over financial reporting.
61
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company and the Operating Partnership are, from time to time, engaged in a variety of legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. Although the results of these legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that the final outcome of such proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in the "Risk Factors" section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2016
.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
On May 19, 2017, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $125 million of our outstanding common shares as market conditions warrant over a period commencing on May 19, 2017 and expiring on May 18, 2019. Repurchases may be made through open market, privately-negotiated, structured or derivative transactions (including accelerated stock repurchase transactions), or other methods of acquiring shares. The Company intends to structure open market purchases to occur within pricing and volume requirements of Rule 10b-18. The Company may, from time to time, enter into Rule 10b5-1 plans to facilitate the repurchase of its shares under this authorization.
The following table summarizes our common share repurchases for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2017
:
Period
Total number of shares purchased
Average price paid per share
Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs
Approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs
(in millions)
July 1, 2017 to July 31, 2017
—
$
—
—
$
85.7
August 1, 2017 to August 31, 2017
413,604
24.18
413,604
75.7
September 1, 2017 to September 30, 2017
—
—
—
75.7
Total
413,604
$
24.18
413,604
$
75.7
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable
62
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit Number
Exhibit Descriptions
4.1
Eleventh Supplemental Indenture (Supplement to Indenture dated as of March 1, 1996) dated July 3, 2017. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 filed with the Company's and Operating Partnership's Report on Form 8-K dated July 3, 2017).
12.1*
Company's Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
12.2*
Operating Partnership's Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
31.1*
Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
31.2*
Principal Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
31.3*
Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Properties Limited Partnership.
31.4*
Principal Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Properties Limited Partnership.
32.1**
Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
32.2**
Principal Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
32.3**
Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Properties Limited Partnership.
32.4**
Principal Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 for Tanger Properties Limited Partnership.
101*
The following financial statements from Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and Tanger Properties Limited Partnership's dual Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited), (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited), (iii) Consolidated Statements of Other Comprehensive Income (unaudited), (iv) Consolidated Statements of Equity (unaudited), (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited), and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited).
* Filed herewith.
** Furnished herewith.
63
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
DATE:
November 8, 2017
TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC.
By:
/s/ James F. Williams
James F. Williams
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
By: TANGER GP TRUST, its sole general partner
By:
/s/ James F. Williams
James F. Williams
Vice President and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
64