Tiptree - 10-Q quarterly report FY

 

 

(Mark One)

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

505 Fifth Avenue, 6th Floor, New York, New York 10017
(Address of Registrant’s principal executive offices)

(212) 771-0505
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.Yeso Noþ

     Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date.

     As of August 7, 2009, there were 20,075,018 shares, par value $0.001, of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(dollars in thousands — except share and per share data)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands — except share and per share data)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except share data)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Care Investment Trust Inc. and Subsidiaries — Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 1 — Organization

     Care Investment Trust Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, the “Company” or “Care” unless otherwise indicated or except where the context otherwise requires, “we”, “us” or “our”) is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) with a geographically diverse portfolio of senior housing and healthcare-related assets in the United States. Care is externally managed and advised by CIT Healthcare LLC (“Manager”). As of June 30, 2009, Care’s portfolio of assets consisted of real estate and mortgage related assets for senior housing facilities, skilled nursing facilities, medical office properties and first mortgage liens on healthcare related assets. Our owned senior housing facilities are leased, under “triple-net” leases, which require the tenants to pay all property-related expenses.

     Care elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2007. To maintain our tax status as a REIT, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to our stockholders. At present, Care does not have any taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS”), but in the normal course of business expects to form such subsidiaries as necessary.

Note 2 — Basis of Presentation

     The accompanying condensed financial statements are unaudited. In our opinion, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows have been made. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008 has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet as of that date. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been omitted in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation S-X and the instructions to Form 10-Q. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.

     The Company has no items of other comprehensive income, and accordingly, net income or loss is equal to comprehensive income or loss for all periods presented.

     Investments in loans amounted to $101.2 million at June 30, 2009 as compared with $159.9 million at December 31, 2008. We account for our investment in loans in accordance with SFAS No. 65, Accounting for Certain Mortgage Banking Activities (“SFAS No. 65”). Under SFAS No. 65, loans expected to be held for the foreseeable future or to maturity should be held at amortized cost, and all other loans should be held at the lower of cost or market (LOCOM), measured on an individual basis. At December 31, 2008, in connection with our decision to reposition ourselves from a mortgage REIT to a traditional direct property ownership REIT (referred to as an equity REIT, see Notes 2, 3, and 4 to the financial statements) and as a result of existing market conditions, we transferred our portfolio of mortgage loans to LOCOM because we are no longer certain that we will hold the portfolio of loans either until maturity or for the foreseeable future.

     Until December 31, 2008, we held our loans until maturity, and therefore the loans had been carried at amortized cost, net of unamortized loan fees, acquisition and origination costs, unless the loans were impaired.

     In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (“SFAS 160”) — an amendment of ARB No. 51. SFAS 160 requires that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary be reported as equity and the amount of consolidated net income specifically attributable to the noncontrolling interest be identified in the consolidated financial statements. It also calls for consistency in the manner of reporting changes in the parent’s ownership interest and requires fair value measurement of any noncontrolling equity investment retained in a deconsolidation. SFAS 160 is effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. The Company records its investments using the equity method and does not consolidate these joint ventures. As such, there is no impact upon adoption of SFAS 160 on its consolidated financial statements.

     In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141R, Business Combinations (“SFAS 141R”). SFAS 141R broadens the guidance of SFAS 141, extending its applicability to all transactions and other events in which one entity obtains control over one or more other businesses. It broadens the fair value measurement and recognition of assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and interests transferred as a result of business combinations. SFAS 141R expands on required disclosures to improve the statement users’ abilities to evaluate the nature and financial effects of business combinations. SFAS 141R applies prospectively and is effective for business combinations made by the Company beginning January 1, 2009. As such, the adoption of SFAS 141R has no effect on its consolidated financial statements.

     On March 20, 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS 161”), an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“SFAS 133”). SFAS 161 provides for enhanced disclosures about how and why an entity uses derivatives and how and where those derivatives and related hedged items are reported in the entity’s financial statements. SFAS 161 also requires certain tabular formats for disclosing such information. SFAS 161 applies to all entities and all derivative instruments and related hedged items accounted for under SFAS 133. Among other things, SFAS 161 requires disclosures of an entity’s objectives and strategies for using derivatives by primary underlying risk and certain disclosures about the potential future collateral or cash requirements (that is, the effect on the entity’s liquidity) as a result of contingent credit-related features. SFAS 161 is effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. The Company adopted SFAS 161 in the first quarter of 2009 and included disclosures in its consolidated financial statements addressing how and why the Company uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments are accounted for and how derivative instruments affect the Company’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. (See Note 9)

     In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (“FSP FAS 107-1” and “APB 28-1”). FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 amends SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments and APB Opinion No. 28 Interim Financial Reporting by requiring an entity to provide qualitative and quantitative information on a quarterly basis about fair value estimates for any financial instruments not measured on the balance sheet at fair value. The Company adopted the disclosure requirements of FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 in the quarter ended June 30, 2009.

     In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 165, Subsequent Events (“SFAS 165”). SFAS 165 introduces the concept of financial statements being available to be issued. It requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date, that is, whether that date represents the date the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. This disclosure is meant to alert all users of financial statements that an entity has not evaluated subsequent events after that date in the set of financial statements being presented. SFAS 165 is effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted SFAS 165 in the 2009 second quarter. The Company evaluates subsequent events as of the date of issuance of its financial statements and considers the impact of all events that have taken place to that date in its disclosures and financials statements when reporting on the Company’s financial position and results of operations. The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the filing date of this report and has determined that no other events need to be disclosed.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (“SFAS No. 166”), which amends the derecognition guidance in SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, eliminates the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity” (“QSPE”) and requires more information about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions as well as a company’s continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. SFAS No. 166 is effective for financial asset transfers made by the company beginning of January 1, 2010 and early adoption is prohibited. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 166 on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (“SFAS No. 167”), which amends the consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest entities (VIEs). The amendments will significantly affect the overall consolidation analysis under FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities—an interpretation of ARB No. 51, and changes the way entities account for securitizations and special purpose entities as a result of the elimination of the QSPE concept in SFAS No.166. SFAS No. 167 is effective for the Company January 1, 2010 and early adoption is prohibited. Management is currently evaluating the impact on our consolidated financial statements of adopting SFAS No. 167.

Note 3 — Investments in Loans

     As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, our net investments in loans amounted to $101.2 million and $159.9 million, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, we received $0.9 million and $2.0 million in principal repayments, respectively as compared with $1.9 million and $3.0 million received during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. Our investments include senior whole loans and participations secured primarily by real estate in the form of pledges of ownership interests, direct liens or other security interests. The investments are in various geographic markets in the United States. These investments are all variable rate at June 30, 2009, had a weighted average spread of 5.64% over one month LIBOR, and an average maturity of approximately 2.0 years. At December 31, 2008 the investments in loans had a weighted average spread of 5.76% over one month LIBOR and have an average maturity of 2.1 years. The effective yield on the portfolio for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and the year ended December 31, 2008, was 5.95% and 6.20%, respectively. One month LIBOR was 0.31% at June 30, 2009 and 0.45% at December 31, 2008.

     Our mortgage portfolio (gross) at June 30, 2009 is diversified by property type and U.S. geographic region as follows:

     For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company received proceeds of $37.5 million related to the prepayment of balances related to two mortgage loans. See Note 9 for a roll forward of the investment in loans held at fair value from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009.

     At June 30, 2009, our portfolio of fourteen mortgages was extended to eleven borrowers with the largest exposure to any single borrower at 27.5% of the gross value of the portfolio. The gross value of three loans, each to different borrowers with exposures of more than 10% of the carrying value of the total portfolio, amounted to 60.7% of the portfolio. At December 31, 2008, the largest exposure to any single borrower was 20.9% of the portfolio gross value and five other loans, each to different borrowers each with exposures of more than 10% of the gross value of the total portfolio, amounted to 55.1% of the portfolio.

Note 4 — Sale of Investment in Loan Held for Sale

     On February 3, 2009, we sold one loan with a net carrying amount of approximately $22.5 million as of December 31, 2008. Proceeds from the sale approximated the net carrying value of $22.5 million. The loan was sold under the Mortgage Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with our Manager, which was finalized in 2008 and provides us an option to sell loans from our investment portfolio to our Manager at the loan’s fair value on the sale date. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources” for a discussion of the terms and conditions of the Agreement.

Note 5 — Investment in Partially-Owned Entities

     For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 the net loss in our equity interest related to the Cambridge Holdings, Inc. (“Cambridge”) portfolio amounted to $1.6 million and $2.8 million, respectively. This included $2.4 million and $4.8 million, respectively, attributable to our share of the depreciation and amortization expense associated with the Cambridge properties. The Company’s investment in the Cambridge entities was $54.1 million at June 30, 2009 and $58.1 million at December 31, 2008. We received the third and fourth quarter 2008 distributions of approximately $2.3 million in aggregate in April 2009 and we received the first quarter 2009 distribution of approximately $1.3 million in July 2009.

     For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, we recognized $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, in equity income from our interest in Senior Management Concepts, LLC (“SMC”) and received $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, in distributions.

     On October 1, 2007, Care entered into a master repurchase agreement with Column Financial, Inc. (“Column”), an affiliate of Credit Suisse, one of the underwriters of Care’s initial public offering in June 2007. This type of lending arrangement is often referred to as a warehouse facility. The master repurchase agreement provided an initial line of credit of up to $300 million. On March 6, 2009, the Board authorized the repayment in full of the $37.8 million outstanding balance on the Column warehouse line of credit, and the line was paid off on March 9, 2009. In connection with the payoff, the Company wrote off approximately $0.5 million of deferred charges.

     On June 26, 2008, in connection with the acquisition of the twelve properties from Bickford Senior Living Group LLC (“Bickford”), the Company entered into a mortgage loan with Red Mortgage Capital, Inc. for $74.6 million. The terms of the mortgage require interest-only payments at a fixed interest rate of 6.845% for the first twelve months. Commencing on the first anniversary and every month thereafter, the mortgage loan requires a fixed monthly payment of $0.5 million for both principal and interest until the maturity in July 2015 when the then outstanding balance of $69.6 million is due and payable. The mortgage loan is collateralized by the properties.

     On September 30, 2008 with the acquisition of the two additional properties from Bickford, the Company entered into an additional mortgage loan with Red Mortgage Capital, Inc. for $7.6 million. The terms of the mortgage require payments based on a fixed interest rate of 7.17%. Commencing on the first of November 2008 and every month thereafter, the mortgage loan requires a fixed monthly payment of approximately $52,000 for both principal and interest until the maturity in July 2015 when the then outstanding balance of $7.1 million is due and payable. The mortgage loan is collateralized by the properties.

     In connection with our initial public offering in 2007, we entered into a Management Agreement with our Manager, which describes the services to be provided by our Manager and its compensation for those services. Under the Management Agreement, our Manager, subject to the oversight of the Board of Directors of Care, is required to manage the day-to-day activities of the Company, for which the Manager receives a base management fee and is eligible for an incentive fee. The Manager is also entitled to charge the Company for certain expenses incurred on behalf of Care.

     On September 30, 2008, we amended our Management Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the amendment, the Base Management Fee (as defined in the Management Agreement) payable to the Manager under the Management Agreement is reduced to a monthly amount equal to 1/12 of 0.875% of the Company’s equity (as defined in the Management Agreement). In addition, pursuant to the terms of the amendment, the Incentive Fee (as defined in the Management Agreement) to the Manager pursuant to the Management Agreement has been eliminated and the Termination Fee (as defined in the Management Agreement) to the Manager upon the termination or non-renewal of the Management Agreement shall be equal to the average annual Base Management Fee as earned by the Manager during the immediately preceding two years multiplied by three, but in no event shall the Termination Fee be less than $15.4 million. No Termination Fee is payable if we terminate the Management Agreement for cause.

     Transactions with our Manager during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008 include:

     As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we have a liability to our Manager, primarily for the reimbursement of expenses, of approximately $1.1 million and approximately $3.8 million, respectively.

          Our Manager is a wholly owned subsidiary of CIT Group Inc. CIT Group announced on July 20, 2009 that its ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on a number of factors, including (i) the successful completion of a cash tender offer for its outstanding floating rate notes due August 17, 2009, (ii) obtaining sufficient financing from third party sources to continue operations and (iii) successfully implementing certain operational restructuring actions and improvements. If CIT Group is unsuccessful in this regard, it may be forced to seek relief under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

     Care does not have any employees. Our officers are employees of our Manager and its affiliates. Care does not have any separate facilities and are completely reliant on our Manager, which has significant discretion as to the implementation of our operating policies and strategies. We depend on the diligence, skill and network of business contacts of our Manager. Our executive officers and the other employees of our Manager and its affiliates source, evaluate, negotiate, structure, close, service and monitor our investments. CIT Group’s current financial situation may detract from our Manager’s ability to meet its obligations to us under the management agreement, and the departure of a significant number of the professionals of our Manager or its affiliates brought on by CIT Group’s current financial situation could have a material adverse effect on our performance.

     We recorded approximately $0.2 million of expense during the 2009 second quarter, related to the remeasurement of shares of restricted stock granted to our independent board members. (see Note 10)

     The Company has established processes for determining fair values and fair value is based on quoted market prices, where available. If listed prices or quotes are not available, then fair value is based upon internally developed models that primarily use inputs that are market-based or independently-sourced market parameters.

     A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels of valuation hierarchy are defined as follows:

     The following describes the valuation methodologies used for the Company’s financial instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

     Investment in loans — the fair value of the portfolio is based on an internally developed model. Investing in healthcare-related commercial mortgage debt is transacted through an over-the-counter market with minimal pricing transparency. Loans are infrequently traded and market quotes are not widely available and disseminated. Our investments in variable rate loans bear interest at stated spreads to a floating base rate (one month LIBOR) and re-price monthly. The valuation model involves the use of estimates. The variables in the model include the expected life of the loans, a discount factor based on the expected market return for these assets, and the expected cash flows to be received from the portfolio determined on an asset by asset basis. The Company also gives consideration to the credit worthiness of the borrowers in determining the fair value of the portfolio. At June 30, 2009, we valued our loans assuming a weighted average life of 2.0 years, and a yield of 15%. When loans are under contract for sale, they are valued at their net realizable value and are valued using a combination of level 1 and level 2 inputs and for loans which are not under contract for sale, they are valued using level 3 inputs.

     Obligation to issue operating partnership units — the fair value of our obligation to issue operating partnership units is based on an internally developed valuation model, as quoted market prices are not available nor are quoted prices for similar liabilities. Our model involves the use of management estimates as well as some Level 2 inputs. The variables in the model include the estimated

release dates of the shares out of escrow, based on the expected performance of the underlying properties, a discount factor of approximately 16%, and the market price and expected dividend of Care’s common shares at each measurement date.

     Cash interest paid during the six months ended June 30, 2009 is approximately $2.9 million.

     The following table presents the Company’s financial instruments carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2009:

     The table below presents reconciliations for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the six months ended June 30, 2009. Level 3 instruments presented in the tables include a liability to issue operating partnership units, which are carried at fair value. These instruments were valued using models that, in management’s judgment, reflect the assumptions a marketplace participant would use at June 30, 2009:

     In addition we are required to disclose fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the financial statements, for which it is practical to estimate that value. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon the application of discount rates to estimated future cash flows based on market yields or other appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts we could realize on disposition of the financial instruments. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

     In addition to the amounts reflected in the financial statements at fair value as noted above, cash equivalents, accrued interest receivable, and accounts payable and accrued expenses reasonably approximate their fair values due to the short maturities of these items.

     Management believes that the fair value of the mortgage notes payable of $74.6 million and $7.6 million that were incurred from the acquisitions of the Bickford properties on June 26, 2008 and September 30, 2008, respectively, is approximately $85.5 million as of June 30, 2009.

     The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business. The primary risk managed by using derivative instruments is interest rate risk. Interest rate caps are entered into to manage interest rate risk associated with the Company’s borrowings. The company has no existing interest rate caps as of June 30, 2009.

     We are required to recognize all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value in the statement of financial position. The Company has not designated any of its derivatives as hedging instruments. The Company’s financial statements included the following fair value amounts and gains and losses on derivative instruments (dollars in thousands):

Note 10 — Stockholders’ Equity

     Our authorized capital stock consists of 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value and 250,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value. As of June 30, 2009, no shares of preferred stock were issued and outstanding and 21,061,224 shares and 20,060,600 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding, respectively.

     On April 8, 2008, the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of Care awarded the Company’s CEO, 35,000 shares of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) under the Care Investment Trust Inc. Equity Incentive Plan (“Equity Plan”). The RSUs had a fair value of $385,000 on the grant date. The vesting of the award is 50% on the third anniversary of the award and the remaining 50% on the fourth anniversary of the award.

     On May 12, 2008, the Committee approved two new long-term equity incentive programs under the Equity Plan. The first program is an annual performance-based RSU award program (the “RSU Award Program”). All RSUs granted under the RSU Award Program vest over four years. The second program is a three-year performance share plan (the “Performance Share Plan”).

     In connection with the initial adoption of the RSU Award Program, certain employees of the Manager and its affiliates were granted 68,308 RSUs on the adoption date with a fair value of $0.7 million. 9,242 of these shares were forfeited in 2009. 14,763 of these shares vested in May 2009. Achievement of awards under the 2008 RSU Award Program was based upon the Company’s ability to meet both financial (AFFO per share) and strategic (shifting from a mortgage to an equity REIT) performance goals during 2008, as well as on the individual employee’s ability to meet individual performance goals. In accordance with the 2008 RSU Award Program 49,961 RSUs and 30,333 RSUs were granted on March 12, 2009 and May 7, 2009, respectively. RSUs granted during 2008 and in connection with the 2008 RSU Award Program vest as follows:

     As of June 30, 2009, 180,677 shares of our common stock and 197,615 RSUs had been granted pursuant to the Equity Plan and 331,708 shares remain available for future issuances. The Equity Plan will automatically expire on the 10th anniversary of the date it was adopted. Care’s Board of Directors may terminate, amend, modify or suspend the Equity Plan at any time, subject to stockholder approval in the case of amendments or modifications. We recorded $0.2 million of expense related to compensation and $0.2 million of expense related to remeasurement of grants to fair value for the six months ended June 30, 2009. All of the shares issued under our Equity Plan are considered non-employee awards. Accordingly, the expense for each period is determined based on the fair value of each share or unit awarded over the required performance period.

     Shares Issued to Directors for Board Fees:

     On January 5, 2009 and April 3, 2009, respectively, 9,624 and 13,734 shares of common stock with an aggregate fair value of approximately $150,000 were granted to our independent directors as part of their annual retainer. Each independent director receives an annual base retainer of $100,000, payable quarterly in arrears, of which 50% is paid in cash and 50% in common stock of Care. Shares granted as part of the annual retainer vest immediately and are included in general and administrative expense.

Note 11 — Income per Share (in thousands, except share and per share data)

     On December 2, 2008, the Company completed the repurchase of 1,000,000 shares of common stock from GoldenTree Asset Management LP. These shares are recorded as Treasury Stock in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company does not pay dividends on treasury shares.

Note 12 — Commitments and Contingencies

     Several of our investments in loans have commitment amounts in excess of the amount that we have funded to date on such loans. At June 30, 2009, Care was obligated to provide approximately $3.6 million in additional financing at the request of our borrowers, subject to the borrowers’ compliance with their respective loan agreements, and approximately $3.3 million in tenant improvements related to our purchase of the Cambridge properties.

     Care is also obligated to fund additional payments for expansion of four of the facilities acquired in the Bickford transaction on June 26, 2008. The maximum amount that the Company is obligated to fund is $7.2 million. Since these payments would increase our investment in the properties, the minimum base rent and additional base rent would increase based on the amounts funded. After funding the expansion payments and meeting certain conditions as outlined in the documents associated with the transaction, the sellers are entitled to the balance of the commitment of $7.2 million less the total of all expansion payments made in conjunction with the properties.

     Under our Management Agreement, our Manager, subject to the oversight of the Company’s Board of Directors, is required to manage the day-to-day activities of Care, for which the Manager receives a Base Management Fee. The Management Agreement has an initial term expiring on June 30, 2010, and will be automatically renewed for one-year terms thereafter unless either we or our Manager elect not to renew the agreement. The Base Management Fee is payable monthly in arrears in an amount equal to 1/12 of

0.875% of the Company’s stockholders’ equity at the end of each month, computed in accordance with GAAP, adjusted for certain items pursuant to the terms of the Management Agreement.

     In addition, our Manager may be entitled to a termination fee, payable for non-renewal of the Management Agreement without cause, in an amount equal to three times the average annual base fee, as earned by our Manager during the two years immediately preceding the most recently completed calendar quarter prior to the date of termination, but no less than $15.4 million. No Termination Fee is payable if we terminate the Management Agreement for cause.

     On September 18, 2007, a class action complaint for violations of federal securities laws was filed in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York alleging that the Registration Statement relating to the initial public offering of shares of our common stock, filed on June 21, 2007, failed to disclose that certain of the assets in the contributed portfolio were materially impaired and overvalued and that Care was experiencing increasing difficulty in securing our warehouse financing lines. On January 18, 2008, the court entered an order appointing co-lead plaintiffs and co-lead counsel. On February 19, 2008, the co-lead plaintiffs filed an amended complaint citing additional evidentiary support for the allegations in the complaint. Care believes the complaint and allegations are without merit and intend to defend against the complaint and allegations vigorously. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on April 22, 2008. The plaintiffs filed an opposition to the Company’s motion to dismiss on July 9, 2008. On March 4, 2009, the court denied Care’s motion to dismiss. Care filed its answer on April 15, 2009. At a conference held on May 15, 2009, the Court ordered the parties to make a joint submission (the “Joint Statement”) setting forth: (i) the specific statements that Plaintiffs claim are false and misleading; (ii) the facts on which Plaintiffs rely as showing each alleged misstatement was false and misleading; and (iii) the facts on which Defendants rely as showing those statements were true. The parties filed the Joint Statement on June 3, 2009. On July 31, 2009, the parties entered into a stipulation that narrowed the scope of the proceeding to the single issue of the warehouse financing disclosure in the Registration Statement. To date, Care has incurred approximately $0.8 million to defend against this complaint. No provision for loss related to this matter has been accrued at June 30, 2009.

     Care is not presently involved in any other material litigation nor, to our knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against us or our investments, other than routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes the costs, if any, incurred by us related to litigation will not materially affect our financial position, operating results or liquidity.

Note 13 — Financial Instruments: Derivatives

     The fair value of our obligation to issue operating partnership units was $1.5 million and $3.0 million at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, resulting in an unrealized gain of $1.5 million in the six months of 2009.

     On February 1, 2008, we entered into three interest rate caps on three loans pledged as collateral under our warehouse line of credit in order to increase the advance rates available on the pledged loans. These caps were terminated on April 20, 2009 for an amount equal to the remaining book value.

Note 14 — Subsequent Events

     In July 2009, we received the first quarter 2009 distributions from Cambridge of approximately $1.3 million.

     The following should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included herein. This “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contains certain non-GAAP financial measures. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” and supporting schedules for reconciliation of our non-GAAP financial measures to the comparable GAAP financial measures.

     Care Investment Trust Inc. (all references to “Care”, “the Company”, “we”, “us”, and “our” means Care Investment Trust Inc. and its subsidiaries) is an externally-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed principally to invest in healthcare-related real estate and mortgage debt. Care was incorporated in Maryland in March 2007, and we completed our initial public offering on June 22, 2007. The Company was originally positioned as a healthcare REIT with an emphasis on making mortgage investments in healthcare-related properties, while also opportunistically targeting acquisitions of healthcare real estate. Care’s initial investment portfolio at the time of our initial public offering was entirely comprised of mortgage loans. In response to dislocations in the overall credit market, in particular the securitized financing markets, we redirected our focus in the latter part of 2007 to place greater emphasis on ownership of high quality healthcare real estate investments. Our shift in investment emphasis was prompted by the dislocations in the CDO (collateralized debt obligations) and CMBS (commercial mortgage-backed securities) markets, which have resulted in significant contraction of liquidity available in the marketplace and hindered our original intent to efficiently leverage our mortgage investments through securitized borrowings using our mortgage investments as collateral.

     As of June 30, 2009, we maintained a diversified investment portfolio of $265.1 million which was comprised of $60.8 million in real estate owned through unconsolidated joint ventures (23%), $103.1 million in wholly-owned real estate (39%) and $101.2 million in investments in loans held at the lower of cost or market (38%). Our current investments in healthcare real estate include medical office buildings and assisted and independent living and Alzheimer facilities. Our loan portfolio is primarily composed of first mortgages on skilled nursing facilities, assisted and independent living facilities, and mixed-use facilities.

     We utilize leverage in accordance with our investment guidelines in order to increase our overall returns. Our investment guidelines state that our leverage will generally not exceed 80% of the total value of our investments. Dislocations in the credit markets have resulted in significantly reduced availability of liquidity and have required Care to utilize less leverage, resulting in slower growth than planned. We cannot anticipate when credit markets will stabilize and the availability of liquidity increases. Our actual leverage will depend on our mix of investments and the cost and availability of leverage. Our charter and bylaws do not limit the amount of indebtedness we can incur, and our board of directors has discretion to deviate from or change investment guidelines at any time.

     As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal taxes on our REIT taxable income to the extent that we distribute our taxable income to stockholders and maintain our status as a qualified REIT.

     Care is externally managed and advised by CIT Healthcare LLC (the “Manager”). Our Manager is a healthcare finance company that offers a full-spectrum of financing solutions and related strategic advisory services to companies across the healthcare industry

throughout the United States. Our Manager was formed in 2004 and is a wholly owned subsidiary of CIT Group Inc. (“CIT”). CIT announced on July 20, 2009 that its ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on a number of factors, including (i) the successful completion of a cash tender offer for its outstanding floating rate notes due August 17, 2009, (ii) obtaining sufficient financing from third party sources to continue operations and (iii) successfully implementing certain operational restructuring actions and improvements. If CIT Group is unsuccessful in this regard, it may be forced to seek relief under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

     A summary of our critical accounting policies is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” There have been no significant changes to those policies during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009.

     During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recognized $3.2 million of rental revenue on the twelve properties acquired in the Bickford transaction on June 26, 2008 and the acquisition of two additional properties from Bickford on September 30, 2008, as compared with $0.1 million during the comparable quarter ended June 30, 2008. The increase in revenue was the result of recognizing a full quarter of rental revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to a partial quarter of revenue during the comparable period in 2008.

     We earned investment income on our portfolio of mortgage investments of approximately $1.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 as compared with $3.5 million for the comparable period ended June 30, 2008, a decrease of approximately 48%. Our portfolio of mortgage investments are floating rate based upon LIBOR. The decrease in income related to this portfolio is primarily attributable to (i) the decrease in average LIBOR during the period and (ii) the loss of interest income from (a) the prepayment of two loans from our mortgage portfolio during the second quarter of 2009 and (b) the sale of two loans from our mortgage portfolio during the fourth quarter of 2008 and first quarter of 2009. The average one month LIBOR during the three months ended June 30, 2009 was 0.37% as compared with 2.60% for the comparative three month period ended June 30, 2008. Mitigating some of the decrease in LIBOR were interest rate floors which placed limits on how low the respective loans could reset. Our portfolio of mortgage investments are all variable rate instruments, and at June 30, 2009, had a weighted average spread of 5.64% over one month LIBOR, with an effective yield of 5.95% and an average maturity of approximately 2.0 years. The effective yield on the portfolio for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was 6.92%.

     For the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded management fee expense payable to our Manager under our Management Agreement of approximately $0.5 million as compared with $1.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. The decrease in management fee expense is primarily attributable to the fee reduction in accordance with the renegotiated Management Agreement, effective August 1, 2008.

     Marketing, general and administrative expenses were approximately $3.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and consist of fees for professional services, insurance, general overhead costs for the Company and real estate taxes on our facilities as compared with $0.5 million for the comparative three months ended June 30, 2008, an increase of $2.5 million. The increase is primarily for fees for professional services in connection with the ongoing review of the Company’s strategic direction. Included in our expenses is stock based non-employee compensation related to our issuance of restricted common stock to our Manager’s employees, some of whom are also Care officers or directors, and our independent directors. We recognized an expense of $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 related to remeasurement of stock grants as compared with a reversal of expense of $0.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. The increase was the result of the impact of additional share issuances and vesting, offset by a decline in the Company’s stock price, which is a factor in the remeasurement of the stock-based awards. The balance of this compensation will be recognized over the remaining vesting period and the amount of the compensation adjusted to fair value at each measurement date. In addition, for each of the three months ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, we paid $0.1 million in stock-based compensation related to shares of our common stock earned by our independent directors as part of their compensation. Each independent director is paid a base retainer of

$100,000, which is payable 50% in cash and 50% in stock. Payments are made quarterly in arrears. Shares of our common stock issued to our independent directors as part of their annual compensation vest immediately and are expensed by us accordingly.

     The management fees, expense reimbursements, and the relationship between our Manager and us are discussed further in Note 8.

     For the three months ended June 30, 2009, net loss from partially-owned entities amounted to $1.3 million, as compared with a loss of $1.1 million for the comparable quarter ended June 30, 2008, an increase of $0.2 million. Our equity in the non-cash operating loss of the Cambridge properties for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 was $1.6 million, which included $2.4 million attributable to our share of the depreciation and amortization expenses associated with the Cambridge properties, partially offset by our share of equity income in SMC of $0.3 million.

     We recognized a $0.3 million unrealized gain on the fair value of our obligation to issue partnership units related to the Cambridge transaction for the three months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to an unrealized gain of $0.3 million for the comparable period ended June 30, 2008. For the three months ended June 30, 2008, an unrealized gain of $44,000 was recorded on the fair value of the Company’s interest rate caps, which were terminated on April 20, 2009 for an amount equal to the remaining book value. (see Notes 9 and 13).

     We incurred interest expense of approximately $1.5 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as compared with interest expense of $0.5 million for the comparable quarter ended June 30, 2008. Interest expense related to the interest payable on the mortgage debt which was incurred for the acquisition of 14 facilities from Bickford. The increase in interest expense is primarily attributable to the impact of recognizing a full quarter of interest expense during the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as compared to a partial quarter of interest expense during the comparable period in 2008.

     Revenue

     During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we recognized $6.3 million of rental revenue on the twelve properties acquired in the Bickford transaction on June 26, 2008 and the acquisition of two additional properties from Bickford on September 30, 2008, as compared with $0.1 million during the comparable quarter ended June 30, 2008. The increase in revenue was the result of recognizing two full quarters of rental revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to a partial quarter of revenue during the comparable period in 2008.

     We earned investment income on our portfolio of mortgage investments of approximately $4.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to $8.2 million for the comparable period in 2008. The decrease in income related to this portfolio is primarily attributable to (i) the decrease in average LIBOR during the period and (ii) the loss of interest income from (a) the prepayment of two loans from our mortgage portfolio during the second quarter of 2009 and (b) the sale of two loans from our mortgage portfolio during the fourth quarter of 2008 and first quarter of 2009. Our portfolio of mortgage investments are all variable rate instruments, and at June 30, 2009, had a weighted average spread of 5.64% over one month LIBOR, with an effective yield of 5.95% and an average maturity of approximately 2.0 years. The effective yield on the portfolio for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was 6.92%.

     Other income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 reflects $0.2 million in extension and other fees as well as interest earned on invested cash balances as compared with $0.4 million for the comparable period in 2008.

     For the six months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded management fee expense payable to our Manager under our Management Agreement of approximately $1.2 million consisting of the Base Management Fee payable to our Manager under our Management Agreement as compared to $2.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The decrease in management fee expense is primarily attributable to the fee reduction in accordance with the renegotiated Management Agreement, effective August 1, 2008.

     Marketing, general and administrative expenses were approximately $5.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and consist of fees for professional services, insurance, general overhead costs for the Company and real estate taxes on our facilities as

compared with $1.5 million for the comparative six months ended June 30, 2008, an increase of $3.8 million. The increase is primarily for advisor and professional fees in connection with the ongoing review of the Company’s strategic direction. Included in our expenses is stock based non-employee compensation related to our issuance of shares of restricted common stock to our Manager’s employees, some of whom are also Care officers or directors, and our independent directors. We recognized $0.1 million in expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009 related to these stock grants as compared to a reversal of expense of $0.2 million for the comparable period in 2008. The increase was the result of the impact of additional share issuances and vesting, offset by a decline in the Company’s stock price, which is a factor in the remeasurement of the stock-based awards. The balance of this compensation will be recognized over the remaining vesting period and the amount of the compensation adjusted to fair value at each measurement date. In addition, for each of the six months ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, we paid $0.2 million in stock-based compensation related to shares of our common stock earned by our independent directors as part of their compensation. Each independent director is paid a base retainer of $100,000, which is payable 50% in cash and 50% in stock. Payments are made quarterly in arrears. Shares of our common stock issued to our independent directors as part of their annual compensation vest immediately and are expensed by us accordingly.

     The management fees, expense reimbursements, and the relationship between our Manager and us are discussed further in Note 8.

     For the six months ended June 30, 2009, net loss from partially-owned entities amounted to $2.2 million as compared to a net loss of $2.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Our equity in the non-cash operating loss of the Cambridge properties for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $2.8 million, which included $4.8 million attributable to our share of the depreciation and amortization expenses associated with the Cambridge properties, partially offset by our share of equity income in SMC of $0.6 million.

     We recognized a $1.5 million unrealized gain on the fair value of our obligation to issue partnership units related to the Cambridge transaction during the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to an unrealized gain of $45,000 for the comparable period ended June 30, 2008. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, an unrealized gain of $45,000 was recorded on the fair value of the Company’s interest rate caps, which were terminated on April 20, 2009 for an amount equal to the remaining book. (see Notes 9 and 13).

     We incurred interest expense of approximately $3.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared with interest expense of $0.9 million for the comparable quarter ended June 30, 2008. The increase in interest expense is primarily attributable to recognizing two full quarters of interest expense on the debt incurred to finance the acquisition of the twelve properties acquired in the Bickford transaction on June 26, 2008 as compared to a partial quarter of interest expense recognized during the comparable period in 2008.

     Cash and cash equivalents were $53.8 million at June 30, 2009, as compared with $15.4 million at June 30, 2008 for an increase of $38.4 million. Cash during the first six months of 2009 was generated from $60.4 million in proceeds from our investing activities and $6.3 million from operations, offset by $44.7 million used for financing activities during the quarter.

     Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 amounted to $6.3 million as compared with $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Net income before adjustments was $2.0 million. Equity in the operating results of, and distributions from, investments in partially-owned entities added $5.1 million. Non-cash charges for straight-line effects of lease revenue, adjustment to our valuation allowance on loans at LOCOM, amortization of loan premium, amortization and write-off of deferred financing costs, amortization of deferred loan fees, stock-based compensation, net unrealized gain on derivatives, and depreciation and amortization used $2.9 million. The net change in operating assets and liabilities contributed $2.1 million and consisted of an increase in accrued interest receivable and other assets of $0.4 million and an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $4.4 million, offset by a $2.7 million decrease in other liabilities including amounts due to a related party.

     Net cash provided by investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $60.4 million as compared with a use of $81.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008, an increase of $141.8 million. The increase primarily related to the sale of a loan to our Manager for $22.5 million, loan repayments received of $38.9 million and investments in partially-owned entities of $1.1 million during the first six months of 2009, as compared with loan repayments received of $30.2 million and new investments of approximately $111.7 million during the first six months of 2008, which consisted of investments in real estate of $100.8 million, investments in partially-owned entities of $0.1 million and loan investments of $10.7 million.

     Net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $44.7 million as compared with net cash provided by financing activities of $79.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008, a decrease of $124.6 million. The decrease consisted primarily of repayment of $37.8 million and subsequent termination of our warehouse line of credit as well as no material new borrowings during the first six months of 2009 as compared with borrowings under the warehouse line of credit of approximately $13.6 million during the first six months of 2008 and borrowings of $74.6 million to finance the acquisition of the 12 properties acquired in the Bickford transaction.

     Liquidity is a measurement of our ability to meet potential cash requirements, including ongoing commitments to repay borrowings, fund and maintain loans and other investments, pay dividends and other general business needs. Our primary sources of liquidity are interest income earned on our portfolio of loans, rental income from our real estate properties, distributions from our joint ventures and interest income earned from our available cash balances. We also obtain liquidity from repayments of principal by our borrowers in connection with our loans. Lastly, as discussed further below, we have the ability to sell to our Manager certain of our loan assets under the Mortgage Purchase Agreement (the “MPA”) until the MPA expires on September 30, 2009.

     As of June 30, 2009, the Company had $53.8 million in cash and cash equivalents, including $1.3 million related to customer deposits. Due to the payment of our dividend for the first quarter of 2009 in the amount of $3.4 million, we had approximately $53.0 million in cash and cash equivalents as of July 31, 2009.

     Historically, we have relied on borrowings under a warehouse line of credit extended by Column Financial, a lender affiliated with Credit Suisse, to fund our investments. We collateralized the borrowings under our warehouse line of credit with mortgage loans in our portfolio. As of December 31, 2008, the Company had pledged eight mortgage loans with a total principal balance of $114.8 million into the warehouse line and had $37.8 million in borrowings outstanding under the line. On March 9, 2009, we repaid these borrowings in full with cash on hand and terminated the warehouse line.

     On September 30, 2008, we entered into the MPA with our Manager in order to secure an additional source of liquidity. Pursuant to the MPA, the Company has the right, but not the obligation, to cause our Manager to purchase its mortgage assets (the “Mortgage Assets”) at their then-current fair market value, as determined by a third-party appraiser. However, the MPA provides that in no event shall the Manager be obligated to purchase any Mortgage Asset if (a) the Manager has already purchased Mortgage Assets with an aggregate sale price of $125.0 million pursuant to the MPA or (b) the third-party appraiser determines that the fair market value of such Mortgage Asset is greater than 105% of the then outstanding principal balance of such Mortgage Asset. Pursuant to the MPA, we have sold two separate loans for total proceeds of $44.9 million. As a result of these previous sales, we have the ability to sell an additional $80.1 million in Mortgage Assets under the MPA, subject to the conditions of the MPA, until it expires on September 30, 2009.

     Our Manager is a wholly owned subsidiary of CIT Group Inc. CIT Group announced on July 20, 2009 that its ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on a number of factors, including (i) the successful completion of a cash tender offer for its outstanding floating rate notes due August 17, 2009, (ii) obtaining sufficient financing from third party sources to continue operations and (iii) successfully implementing certain operational restructuring actions and improvements. If CIT Group is unsuccessful in this regard, it may be forced to seek relief under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Given CIT Group’s financial situation, there can be no assurance that our Manager will be able to meet its commitment to us to purchase the Mortgage Assets that we may elect to sell to our Manager pursuant to the MPA. In addition, even if we are able to sell our Mortgage Assets to our Manager, there can be no assurance that we will be able to sell such Mortgage Assets to our Manager at attractive prices. See “Part II — Other Information; Item 1A. Risk Factors” below.

     We expect that based upon anticipated loan prepayments and the cash flows from our investments along with the projected funding schedule of our commitments, we will have adequate liquidity to meet our funding obligations for the foreseeable future.

     Our ability to meet our long-term liquidity and capital resource requirements will be subject to obtaining additional debt financing or equity capital. We cannot anticipate when credit markets will stabilize and the availability of liquidity increases. Our actual leverage will depend on our mix of investments and the cost and availability of leverage. If we are unable to expand our sources of financing, it may have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

     To maintain our status as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, we must distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income. These distribution requirements limit our ability to retain earnings and thereby replenish or increase capital for operations. We believe that, if the credit markets return to more historically normal conditions, our capital resources and access to financing will provide us with financial flexibility at levels sufficient to meet current and anticipated capital requirements, including funding new investment opportunities, paying distributions to our stockholders and servicing our debt obligations.

     As of June 30, 2009, we had 20,060,600 shares of common stock outstanding, plus 1,000,624 treasury shares issued. (see Note 10)

     Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market sensitive instruments. In pursuing our business plan, we expect that the primary market risks to which we will be exposed are real estate and interest rate risks.

     We had approximately $53.8 million in cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2009. To the extent that our cash exceeds our near term funding needs, we generally hold the excess cash in bank accounts as well as invest in interest-bearing financial instruments. We employ conservative policies and procedures to manage any risks with respect to investment exposure.

     Our financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents. We place our cash and cash equivalents with what management believes to be high credit quality institutions. At times such investments may be in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limit.

     The value of owned real estate, commercial mortgage assets and net operating income derived from such properties are subject to volatility and may be affected adversely by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, national, regional and local economic conditions which may be adversely affected by industry slowdowns and other factors, local real estate conditions (such as an oversupply of retail, industrial, office or other commercial space), changes or continued weakness in specific industry segments, construction quality, age and design, demographic factors, retroactive changes to building or similar codes, and increases in operating expenses (such as energy costs). In the event net operating income decreases, or the value of property held for sale decreases, a borrower may have difficulty paying our rent or repaying our loans, which could result in losses to us. Even when a property’s net operating income is sufficient to cover the property’s debt service, at the time an investment is made, there can be no assurance that this will continue in the future.

     The current turmoil in the residential mortgage market may continue to have an effect on the commercial mortgage market and real estate industry in general.

     Interest rate risk is highly sensitive to many factors, including the availability of liquidity, governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations and other factors beyond our control.

     Our operating results will depend in large part on differences between the income from assets in our owned real estate and mortgage portfolio and our borrowing costs. All of our loan assets are currently variable-rate instruments, the majority of which contain interest rate floors. Although we have not done so to date, we may enter into hedging transactions with respect to liabilities relating to fixed rate assets in the future. If we were to finance fixed rate assets with variable rate debt and the benchmark for our variable rate debt increased, our net income would decrease.

     At present, our portfolio of variable rate mortgage loans is funded by our equity as restrictive conditions in the securitized debt markets have not enabled us to leverage the portfolio as we originally intended. Accordingly, the income we earn on these loans is subject to variability in interest rates. At current investment levels, changes in interest rates at the magnitudes listed would have the following estimated effect on our gross annual income from investments in loans:

     In the event of a significant rising interest rate environment and / or economic downturn, delinquencies and defaults could increase and result in credit losses to us, which could adversely affect our liquidity and operating results. Further, such delinquencies or defaults could have an adverse effect on the spreads between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.

     Our original funding strategy involved leveraging our loan investments through borrowings, generally through the use of warehouse facilities, bank credit facilities, repurchase agreements, secured loans, securitizations, including the issuance of CDOs or CMBS, loans to entities in which we hold, directly or indirectly, interests in pools of assets, and other borrowings. In the short term we intend to utilize asset-specific debt to finance the acquisition of assets. Currently, the availability of liquidity through CDOs is limited due to investor concerns over dislocations in the debt markets, hedge fund losses, the large volume of unsuccessful leveraged loan syndications and related impact on the overall credit markets. These concerns have materially impacted liquidity in the debt markets, making financing terms for borrowers significantly less attractive. We cannot foresee when credit markets may stabilize and availability of liquidity increases.

     Funds from Operations, or FFO, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, is a widely recognized measure of REIT performance. We compute FFO in accordance with standards established by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, which may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs that do not compute FFO in accordance with the NAREIT definition, or that interpret the NAREIT definition differently than we do.

     The revised White Paper on FFO, approved by the Board of Governors of NAREIT in April 2002 defines FFO as net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from debt restructuring and sales of properties, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.

     Adjusted funds from Operations, or AFFO, is a non-GAAP financial measure. We calculate AFFO as net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (losses) from debt restructuring and gains (losses) from sales of property, plus the expenses associated with depreciation and amortization on real estate assets and non-cash equity compensation expenses and the effects of straight lining lease revenue, one-time events pursuant to changes in GAAP and other non-cash charges. Proportionate adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures will also be taken when calculating the Company’s AFFO.

     We believe that FFO and AFFO provide additional measures of our core operating performance by eliminating the impact of certain non-cash expenses and facilitating a comparison of our financial results to those of other comparable REITs with fewer or no non-cash charges and comparison of our own operating results from period to period. The Company uses FFO and AFFO in this way, and also uses AFFO as one performance metric in the Company’s executive compensation program. The Company also believes that

its investors also use FFO and AFFO to evaluate and compare the performance of the Company and its peers, and as such, the Company believes that the disclosure of FFO and AFFO is useful to (and expected of) its investors.

     However, the Company cautions that neither FFO nor AFFO represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and they should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP), or an indication of our cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP), a measure of our liquidity, or an indication of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions. In addition, our methodology for calculating FFO and/or AFFO may differ from the methodologies employed by other REITs to calculate the same or similar supplemental performance measures, and accordingly, our reported FFO and/or AFFO may not be comparable to the FFO or AFFO reported by other REITs.

     FFO and AFFO for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 were as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

     We make forward looking statements in this Form 10-Q that are subject to risks and uncertainties. These forward looking statements include information about possible or assumed future results of our business and our financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, plans and objectives. They also include, among other things, statements concerning anticipated revenues, income or loss, capital expenditures, dividends, capital structure, or other financial terms, as well as statements regarding subjects that are forward looking by their nature, such as:

     The forward looking statements are based on our beliefs, assumptions, and expectations of our future performance, taking into account the information currently available to us. These beliefs, assumptions, and expectations can change as a result of many possible events or factors, not all of which are known to us. If a change occurs, our business, financial condition, liquidity, and results of operations may vary materially from those expressed in our forward looking statements. You should carefully consider this risk when you make a decision concerning an investment in our securities, along with the following factors, among others, that could cause actual results to vary from our forward looking statements:

     When we use words such as “will likely result,” “may,” “shall,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “project,” “intend,” “estimate,” “goal,” “objective,” or similar expressions, we intend to identify forward looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on these forward looking statements. We are not obligated to publicly update or revise any forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

     We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no matter how well a control system is designed and operated, it can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that it will detect or uncover failures within our company to disclose material information otherwise required to be set forth in our periodic reports.

     As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

     There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended June 30, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

     On September 18, 2007, a class action complaint for violations of federal securities laws was filed in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York alleging that the Registration Statement relating to the initial public offering of shares of our common stock, filed on June 21, 2007, failed to disclose that certain of the assets in the contributed portfolio were materially impaired and overvalued and that we were experiencing increasing difficulty in securing our warehouse financing lines. On January 18, 2008, the court entered an order appointing co-lead plaintiffs and co-lead counsel. On February 19, 2008, the co-lead plaintiffs filed an amended complaint citing additional evidentiary support for the allegations in the complaint. We believe the complaint and allegations are without merit and intend to defend against the complaint and allegations vigorously. We filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on April 22, 2008. The plaintiffs filed an opposition to our motion to dismiss on July 9, 2008, to which we filed our reply on September 10, 2008. On March 4, 2009, the court denied our motion to dismiss. Care filed its answer on April 15, 2009. At a conference held on May 15, 2009, the Court ordered the parties to make a joint submission (the “Joint Statement”) setting forth: (i) the specific statements that Plaintiffs claim are false and misleading; (ii) the facts on which Plaintiffs rely as showing each alleged misstatement was false and misleading; and (iii) the facts on which Defendants rely as showing those statements were true. The parties filed the Joint Statement on June 3, 2009. On July 31, 2009, the parties entered into a stipulation that narrowed the scope of the proceeding to the single issue of the warehouse financing disclosure in the Registration Statement. To date, we have incurred approximately $0.8 million to defend against this complaint. No provision for loss, if any, related to this matter has been accrued at June 30, 2009.

     We are not presently involved in any other material litigation nor, to our knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against us or our investments, other than routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes the costs, if any, incurred by us related to litigation will not materially affect our financial position, operating results or liquidity.

     CIT Group’s Financial Situation May Adversely Impact Our Company

     Our Manager is a wholly owned subsidiary of CIT Group Inc. CIT Group announced on July 20, 2009 that its ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on a number of factors, including (i) the successful completion of a cash tender offer for its outstanding floating rate notes due August 17, 2009, (ii) obtaining sufficient financing from third party sources to continue operations and (iii) successfully implementing certain operational restructuring actions and improvements. If CIT Group is unsuccessful in this regard, it may be forced to seek relief under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

     Care does not have any employees. Our officers are employees of our Manager and its affiliates. We do not have any separate facilities and are completely reliant on our Manager, which has significant discretion as to the implementation of our operating policies and strategies. We depend on the diligence, skill and network of business contacts of our Manager. Our executive officers and the other employees of our Manager and its affiliates source, evaluate, negotiate, structure, close, service and monitor our investments. CIT Group’s current financial situation may detract from our Manager’s ability to meet its obligations to us under the management agreement, and the departure of a significant number of the professionals of our Manager or its affiliates brought on by CIT Group’s current financial situation could have a material adverse effect on our performance. In addition, if CIT Group were to seek relief under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, some or all of our past or future transactions with CIT Group, including those relating to our Mortgage Purchase Agreement or our Management Agreement with our Manager, may be challenged, and any successful challenges could have a material adverse effect on our results of operation, liquidity and financial condition.

     Our 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) was held on June 9, 2009

     Proxies for the Annual Meeting were solicited pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act. There were no solicitations in opposition to management’s nominees for the Board of Directors as listed in our proxy statement or to any other proposals contained in the proxy statement. All such nominees were elected and all such other proposals were approved by our stockholders.

     At the Annual Meeting, stockholders voted on the election of seven directors for the ensuing year. The number of votes cast for and withheld from each nominee for director is set forth below:

     At the Annual Meeting, stockholders also voted on a proposal to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2009. The number of votes cast for and against this proposal and the number of abstentions and broker non-votes are set forth below:

     Except as indicated by an asterisk (*), the following exhibits are filed herewith as part of this Form 10-Q.

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Care Investment Trust Inc.

August 10, 2009

     Except as indicated by an asterisk (*), the following exhibits are filed herewith as part of this Form 10-Q.