ULTA Beauty - 10-Q quarterly report FY2011 Q2

 

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (630) 410-4800

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). þ Yes oNo

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No

The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding as of September 1, 2011 was 61,347,990 shares.

Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. (Company or Ulta) was incorporated in the state of Delaware on January 9, 1990, to operate specialty retail stores selling cosmetics, fragrance, haircare and skincare products, and related accessories and services. The stores also feature full-service salons. As of July 30, 2011, the Company operated 415 stores in 42 states, as shown in the table below:

The accompanying unaudited financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Article 10, Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, the accompanying financial statements reflect all adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature, necessary to fairly state the financial position and results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented.

The Company’s business is subject to seasonal fluctuation. Significant portions of the Company’s net sales and net income are realized during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year due to the holiday selling season. The results for the three and six months ended July 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the fiscal year ending January 28, 2012, or for any other future interim period or for any future year.

These interim financial statements and the related notes should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011. All amounts are stated in thousands, with the exception of per share amounts and number of stores.

Information regarding the Company’s significant accounting policies is contained in Note 2, “Summary of significant accounting policies,” to the financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011. Presented below in this and the following notes is supplemental information that should be read in conjunction with “Notes to Financial Statements” in the Annual Report.

The Company’s quarterly periods are the 13 weeks ending on the Saturday closest to April 30, July 31, October 31, and January 31. The Company’s second quarters in fiscal 2011 and 2010 ended on July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010, respectively.

The Company measures share-based compensation cost on the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and recognizes the expense over the requisite service period for awards expected to vest. The Company estimated the grant date fair value of stock options using a Black-Scholes valuation model using the following assumptions for the periods indicated:

The Company granted 124 and 745 stock options during the six months ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010, respectively. The weighted-average grant date fair value of these options was $28.62 and $11.38, respectively.

The Company recorded stock compensation expense of $2,388 and $2,487 for the three months ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010, respectively. The Company recorded stock compensation expense of $5,196 and $4,222 for the six months ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010, respectively. At July 30, 2011, there was approximately $21,290 of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested options and restricted stock.

Leases — The Company leases stores, distribution and office facilities, and certain equipment. Original non-cancelable lease terms range from three to ten years, and store leases generally contain renewal options for additional years. A number of the Company’s store leases provide for contingent rentals based upon sales. Contingent rent amounts were insignificant in the three and six months ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010. Total rent expense under operating leases was $23,127 and $20,135 for the three months ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010, respectively. Total rent expense under operating leases was $44,984 and $39,594 for the six months ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010, respectively.

General litigation — In May 2010, a putative employment class action lawsuit was filed against the Company and certain unnamed defendants in state court in California. The plaintiff and members of the proposed class are alleged to be (or have been) non-exempt hourly employees. The suit alleges that Ulta violated various provisions of the California labor laws and failed to provide plaintiff and members of the proposed class with full meal periods, paid rest breaks, certain wages, overtime compensation and premium pay. The suit seeks to recover damages and penalties as a result of these alleged practices. On June 21, 2010, the Company filed its answer to the lawsuit. On January 12, 2011, the Company and plaintiffs engaged in a voluntary mediation. Although the Company continues to deny plaintiffs’ allegations, in the interest of putting certain of the claims behind it, the Company agreed in principle to settle all claims of the putative class consisting of non-exempt hourly hair designers in the salon department within the California retail stores. The settlement, which is not an admission of liability, is subject to final documentation and Court approval. Counsel for the plaintiffs has agreed to dismiss without prejudice the claims of all other putative class members. The proposed settlement amount is not material.

The Company is also involved in various legal proceedings that are incidental to the conduct of its business. In the opinion of management, the amount of any liability with respect to these proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, will not be material.

The Company’s credit facility is with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, Collateral Agent and a Lender thereunder, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as a Lender, and PNC Bank, National Association, as a Lender. The facility provides maximum credit of $200,000 through May 31, 2013 and is available for working capital and general corporate purposes. The facility provides maximum borrowings equal to the lesser of $200,000 or a percentage of eligible owned inventory, and contains a $10,000 subfacility for letters of credit. The credit facility agreement contains a restrictive financial covenant requiring the Company to maintain tangible net worth of not less than $200,000. The Company’s tangible net worth was $478,032 at July 30, 2011. Substantially all of the Company’s assets are pledged as collateral for outstanding borrowings under the facility. Outstanding borrowings will bear interest at the prime rate or Libor plus 2.00% and the unused line fee is 0.25%.

As of July 30, 2011 and January 29, 2011, the Company had no borrowings outstanding under the credit facility.

The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximates their estimated fair values due to the short maturities of these instruments.

On February 3, 2008, the Company adopted the ASC rules for fair value measurements and disclosures. The adoption had no impact on the Company’s financial statements. The new rules established a three-tier hierarchy for fair value measurements, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

As of July 30, 2011, the Company held financial liabilities of $1,936 related to its non-qualified deferred compensation plan. The liabilities have been categorized as Level 2 as they are based on third-party reported net asset values which are based primarily on quoted market prices of underlying assets of the funds within the plan.

The following is a reconciliation of net income and the number of shares of common stock used in the computation of net income per basic and diluted share:

The denominators for diluted net income per common share for the three months ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010 exclude 124 and 1,061 employee stock options, respectively, due to their anti-dilutive effects.

The denominators for diluted net income per common share for the six months ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010 exclude 252 and 1,061 employee stock options, respectively, due to their anti-dilutive effects.

We were founded in 1990 as a discount beauty retailer at a time when prestige, mass and salon products were sold through separate distribution channels. After extensive research, we recognized an opportunity to better satisfy how a woman wanted to shop for beauty products, which led to what we believe to be our unique combination of beauty superstore and specialty store attributes. We believe our strategy provides us with the competitive advantages that have contributed to our strong financial performance.

We are currently the largest beauty retailer that provides one-stop shopping for prestige, mass and salon products and salon services in the United States. We combine the unique elements of a beauty superstore with the distinctive environment and experience of a specialty retailer. Key aspects of our beauty superstore strategy include our ability to offer our customers a broad selection of over 20,000 beauty products across the categories of cosmetics, fragrance, haircare, skincare, bath and body products and salon styling tools, as well as salon haircare products. We focus on delivering a compelling value proposition to our customers across all of our product categories. Our stores are conveniently located in high-traffic, primarily off-mall locations such as power centers and lifestyle centers with other destination retailers. As of July 30, 2011, we operated 415 stores across 42 states.

The continued growth of our business and any future increases in net sales, net income and cash flows are dependent on our ability to execute our growth strategy, including growing our store base, expanding our product, brand and service offerings, enhancing our loyalty program, broadening our marketing channels, expanding our e-commerce business and improving our profitability by leveraging our fixed costs. We believe that the steadily expanding U.S. beauty products and services industry, the shift in distribution of prestige beauty products from department stores to specialty retail stores, coupled with Ulta’s competitive strengths, positions us to capture additional market share in the industry through successful execution of our growth strategy.

Comparable store sales is a key metric that is monitored closely within the retail industry. Our comparable store sales have fluctuated in the past and we expect them to continue to fluctuate in the future. A variety of factors affect our comparable store sales, including general U.S. economic conditions, changes in merchandise strategy or mix, and timing and effectiveness of our marketing activities, among others.

Over the long-term, our growth strategy is to increase total net sales through increases in our comparable store sales and by opening new stores. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales is expected to increase as a result of our ability to expand merchandise margin and

leverage our supply chain infrastructure and fixed store costs with comparable store sales increases and operating efficiencies. We plan to continue to improve our operating results by leveraging our fixed costs and decreasing our selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of our net sales.

Economic conditions in the U.S. have become more uncertain in recent weeks. The U.S. credit downgrade in August, 2011 coupled with the continued fiscal stress in Europe, have resulted in wild fluctuations in the U.S. stock markets and negatively impacted consumer sentiment. While the U.S. credit markets have stabilized and credit availability has improved compared to the recent recessionary period, economic growth is expected to continue to be weak. Consumer spending habits are affected by levels of unemployment, unsettled financial markets, weakness in housing and real estate, higher interest rates, fuel and energy costs, and consumer perception of economic conditions, among others. Sudden negative changes in one or more of the factors that affect consumer spending could adversely affect consumer spending levels which could lead to reduced consumer demand for our merchandise and adversely affect our sales levels and financial performance.

We recorded an 11.2% comparable store sales increase during the first half of fiscal 2011. We do not expect the low double digit comparable store sales increases, which began in first quarter fiscal 2010, to continue into the future. Our long-term annual net income growth target of 25% to 30% is based on comparable store sales increases of 3% to 5%.

The company has determined its operating segments on the same basis that it uses to internally evaluate performance. We have combined our three operating segments: retail stores, salon services and e-commerce, into one reportable segment because they have a similar class of consumer, economic characteristics, nature of products and distribution methods.

Net sales include store and e-commerce merchandise sales as well as salon service revenue. We recognize merchandise revenue at the point of sale in our retail stores and the time of shipment in the case of Internet sales. Merchandise sales are recorded net of estimated returns. Salon service revenue is recognized at the time the service is provided. Gift card sales revenue is deferred until the customer redeems the gift card. Company coupons and other incentives are recorded as a reduction of net sales.

Comparable store sales reflect sales for stores beginning on the first day of the 14th month of operation. Therefore, a store is included in our comparable store base on the first day of the period after one year of operations plus the initial one month grand opening period. Non-comparable store sales include sales from new stores that have not yet completed their 13th month of operation and stores that were closed for part or all of the period in either year as a result of remodel activity. Remodeled stores are included in comparable store sales unless the store was closed for a portion of the current or prior period. E-commerce merchandise sales are excluded from comparable store sales. There may be variations in the way in which some of our competitors and other retailers calculate comparable or same store sales. As a result, data herein regarding our comparable store sales may not be comparable to similar data made available by our competitors or other retailers.

Comparable store sales is a critical measure that allows us to evaluate the performance of our store base as well as several other aspects of our overall strategy. Several factors could positively or negatively impact our comparable store sales results:

Cost of sales includes:

Our cost of sales may be negatively impacted as we open an increasing number of stores. Changes in our merchandise mix may also have an impact on cost of sales. This presentation of items included in cost of sales may not be comparable to the way in which our competitors or other retailers compute their cost of sales.

Selling, general and administrative expenses include:

This presentation of items in selling, general and administrative expenses may not be comparable to the way in which our competitors or other retailers compute their selling, general and administrative expenses.

Pre-opening expenses include non-capital expenditures during the period prior to store opening for new, remodeled and relocated stores including rent during the construction period for new and relocated stores, store set-up labor, management and employee training and grand opening advertising.

Interest expense includes interest costs and unused facility fees associated with our credit facility, which is structured as an asset based lending instrument. Our interest expense will fluctuate based on the seasonal borrowing requirements associated with acquiring inventory in advance of key holiday selling periods and fluctuation in the variable interest rates we are charged on outstanding balances. Our credit facility may be used to fund seasonal inventory needs and new and remodel store capital requirements in excess of our cash on hand and cash flow from operations. Our credit facility interest is based on a variable interest rate structure which can result in increased cost in periods of rising interest rates.

Income tax expense reflects the federal statutory tax rate and the weighted average state statutory tax rate for the states in which we operate stores.

Our quarterly periods are the 13 weeks ending on the Saturday closest to April 30, July 31, October 31 and January 31. The Company’s second quarters in fiscal 2011 and 2010 ended on July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010, respectively. Our quarterly results of operations have varied in the past and are likely to do so again in the future. As such, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our results of operations should not be relied upon as an indication of our future performance.

The following tables present the components of our results of operations for the periods indicated:

Net sales increased $72.8 million, or 22.6%, to $394.6 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $321.8 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. Salon service sales increased $2.3 million, or 10.7%, to $23.8 million compared to $21.5 million in second quarter 2010. The net sales increases are due to comparable stores increases of $35.2 million and non-comparable stores increases of $37.6 million compared to the second quarter 2010..

Our comparable store sales increase included a 11.0% increase in traffic and a 0.3% increase in average ticket. We attribute the increase in comparable store sales to our successful marketing and merchandising strategies.

Gross profit increased $30.3 million, or 29.2%, to $134.3 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $104.0 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales increased 170 basis points to 34.0% for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to 32.3% for the three months ended July 31, 2010. The increases in gross profit margin were primarily driven by:

Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses increased $10.9 million, or 13.6%, to $90.8 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $79.9 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A expenses decreased 180 basis points to 23.0% for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to 24.8% for the three months ended July 31, 2010. Approximately 80 basis points of the leverage in SG&A expense is attributed to the $2.8 million non-recurring compensation charge in the second quarter 2010. The remainder of the leverage in SG&A expenses is primarily attributed to store growth and comparable store sales increases.

Pre-opening expenses increased $2.0 million to $3.8 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $1.8 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. During the three months ended July 30, 2011, we opened 21 new stores and remodeled 15 stores, compared to 10 new store openings, 1 relocated store and 3 remodels during the three months ended July 31, 2010.

Interest expense was $0.1 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $0.2 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. We did not access our credit facility during the second quarter fiscal 2011. Interest expense for the period represents various fees related to the credit facility.

Income tax expense of $15.6 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011 represents an effective tax rate of 39.5%, compared to $9.0 million of tax expense representing an effective tax rate of 40.7% for the three months ended July 31, 2010. The lower tax rate is primarily due to a decrease in non-deductible compensation expense compared to the prior year period.

Net income increased $10.8 million, or 83.0%, to $23.9 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $13.1 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. The increase is primarily related to the $30.3 million increase in gross profit, offset by a $10.9 million increase in SG&A expenses and a $6.6 million increase in income tax expense.

Net sales increased $138.6 million, or 21.6%, to $780.6 million for the six months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $642.0 million for the six months ended July 31, 2010. Salon service sales increased $4.5 million, or 10.4%, to $47.6 million compared to $43.1 million in the first six months of fiscal 2010. The net sales increases are due to comparable stores increases of $69.7 million and non-comparable stores increases of $68.9 million compared to the first six months of fiscal 2010.

Our comparable store sales increase included a 10.2% increase in traffic and a 1.0% increase in average ticket. We attribute the increase in comparable store sales to our successful marketing and merchandising strategies.

Gross profit increased $60.7 million, or 29.1%, to $269.2 million for the six months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $208.5 million for the six months ended July 31, 2010. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales increased 200 basis points to 34.5% for the six months ended July 30, 2011, compared to 32.5% for the six months ended July 31, 2010. The increases in gross profit margin were primarily driven by:

Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses increased $24.8 million, or 15.4%, to $185.4 million for the six months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $160.6 million for the six months ended July 31, 2010. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A expenses decreased 120 basis points to 23.8% for the six months ended July 30, 2011, compared to 25.0% for the six months ended July 31, 2010. Approximately 40 basis points of the leverage in SG&A expense is attributed to the $2.8 million non-recurring compensation charge in the second quarter 2010. The remainder of the leverage in SG&A expenses is primarily attributed to store growth and comparable store sales increases.

Pre-opening expenses increased $2.7 million to $5.0 million for the six months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $2.3 million for the six months ended July 31, 2010. During the six months ended July 30, 2011, we opened 26 new stores, relocated 1 store and remodeled 17 stores, compared to 12 new store openings, 2 relocated stores and 3 remodeled stores during the six months ended July 31, 2010.

Interest expense was $0.3 million for the six months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $0.3 million for the six months ended July 31, 2010. We did not access our credit facility during the first half of fiscal 2011. Interest expense for the period represents various fees related to the credit facility.

Income tax expense of $31.2 million for the six months ended July 30, 2011 represents an effective tax rate of 39.8%, compared to $18.5 million of tax expense representing an effective tax rate of 41.0% for the six months ended July 31, 2010. The lower tax rate is primarily due to a decrease in non-deductible compensation expense compared to the prior year period.

Net income increased $20.5 million, or 76.6%, to $47.2 million for the six months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $26.7 million for the six months ended July 31, 2010. The increase is primarily related to the $60.7 million increase in gross profit, offset by a $24.8 million increase in SG&A expenses and a $12.7 million increase in income tax expense.

Our primary cash needs are for capital expenditures for new, relocated and remodeled stores, increased merchandise inventories related to store expansion, and for continued improvement in our information technology systems.

Our primary sources of liquidity are cash flows from operations, including changes in working capital and borrowings under our credit facility. The most significant component of our working capital is merchandise inventories reduced by related accounts payable and accrued expenses. Our working capital position benefits from the fact that we generally collect cash from sales to customers the same day, or within several days of the related sale, while we typically have up to 30 days to pay our vendors.

Our working capital needs are greatest from August through November each year as a result of our inventory build-up during this period for the approaching holiday season. This is also the time of year when we are at maximum investment levels in our new store class and may not have collected all of the landlord allowances due to us as part of our lease agreements. Based on past performance and current expectations, we believe that cash on hand, cash generated from operations and borrowings under our credit facility will satisfy the Company’s working capital needs, capital expenditure needs, commitments, and other liquidity requirements through at least the next 12 months.

The following table presents a summary of our cash flows for the six months ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010:

Operating activities consist of net income adjusted for certain non-cash items, including depreciation and amortization, non-cash stock-based compensation, realized gains or losses on disposal of property and equipment, and the effect of working capital changes.

Merchandise inventories were $258.8 million at July 30, 2011, compared to $224.3 million at July 31, 2010, representing an increase of $34.5 million. The increase is primarily due to the addition of 59 net new stores opened since July 31, 2010, offset by a 1.1% decrease in average inventory per store driven by management initiatives focused on leveraging store and supply chain inventories. The reduction in average inventory per store for the six months ended July 30, 2011 did not affect our store in-stock levels or the customer experience.

Deferred rent liabilities were $153.2 million at July 30, 2011, an increase of $32.9 million compared to July 31, 2010. Deferred rent includes deferred construction allowances, future rental increases and rent holidays which are all recognized on a straight-line basis over their respective lease term. The increase is primarily due to the addition of 59 net new stores opened since July 31, 2010.

The $21.2 million cash flow benefit from income taxes is attributed to larger federal income tax deductions due to accelerated bonus depreciation on fixed assets and a larger number of tax deductible stock option exercises and share sales deemed to be disqualifying dispositions compared to the prior year.

We have historically used cash primarily for new and remodeled stores as well as investments in information technology systems. Investment activities related to capital expenditures were $52.7 million during the six months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $32.6 million during the six months ended July 31, 2010. The increase in capital expenditures year over year is primarily due to the increased number of new store openings during fiscal 2011 and a shift in the pacing of our new store opening schedule in fiscal 2011 as compared to fiscal 2010.

Financing activities in fiscal 2011 consist principally of capital stock transactions. We had no borrowings outstanding under our credit facility as of July 30, 2011 and January 29, 2011. The zero outstanding borrowings position is due to a combination of factors including stronger than expected sales growth, overall performance of management initiatives including expense control as well as inventory and other working capital reductions. While we expect the level of borrowings under the facility will be lower than historical amounts, we expect that we may require borrowings under the facility from time to time in future periods to support our new store program and seasonal inventory needs.

The Company’s credit facility is with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, Collateral Agent and a Lender thereunder, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as a Lender, and PNC Bank, National Association, as a Lender. The facility provides maximum credit of $200 million through May 31, 2013 and is available for working capital and general corporate purposes. The facility provides maximum borrowings equal to the lesser of $200 million or a percentage of eligible owned inventory, and contains a $10 million subfacility for letters of credit. The credit facility agreement contains a restrictive financial covenant requiring us to maintain tangible net worth of not less than $200 million. Our tangible net worth was $478,032 at July 30, 2011. Substantially all of our assets are pledged as collateral for outstanding borrowings under the facility. Outstanding borrowings will bear interest at the prime rate or Libor plus 2.00% and the unused line fee is 0.25%.

As of July 30, 2011 and January 29, 2011, we had no borrowings outstanding under the credit facility.

Our off-balance sheet arrangements consist of operating lease obligations. We do not have any non-cancelable purchase commitments as of July 30, 2011.

Our contractual obligations consist of operating lease obligations and our revolving line of credit under the credit facility. No material changes outside the ordinary course of business have occurred in our contractual obligations during the six months ended July 30, 2011.

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The preparation of these financial statements required the use of estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of our assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Management bases estimates on historical experience and other assumptions it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances and evaluates these estimates on an on-going basis. Actual results may differ from these estimates. There have been no significant changes to the critical accounting policies and estimates included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011.

Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our financial position due to adverse changes in financial market prices and rates. Our market risk exposure is primarily the result of fluctuations in interest rates. We do not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes.

We are exposed to interest rate risks primarily through borrowings under our credit facility. Interest on our borrowings is based upon variable rates. We did not access our credit facility during the first half of fiscal 2011. The interest expense recognized in our statement of income represents fees associated with the credit facility.

We have established disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company is made known to the officers who certify our financial reports and to the members of our senior management and board of directors.

Based on management’s evaluation as of July 30, 2011, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) are effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in our reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There were no changes to our internal controls over financial reporting during the three months ended July 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

General litigation — In May 2010, a putative employment class action lawsuit was filed against us and certain unnamed defendants in state court in California. The plaintiff and members of the proposed class are alleged to be (or have been) non-exempt hourly employees. The suit alleges that Ulta violated various provisions of the California labor laws and failed to provide plaintiff and members of the proposed class with full meal periods, paid rest breaks, certain wages, overtime compensation and premium pay. The suit seeks to recover damages and penalties as a result of these alleged practices. On June 21, 2010, we filed our answer to the lawsuit. On January 12, 2011, the Company and plaintiffs engaged in a voluntary mediation. Although we continue to deny plaintiffs’ allegations, in the interest of putting certain of the claims behind us, we agreed in principle to settle all claims of the putative class consisting of non-exempt hourly hair designers in the salon department within the California retail stores. The settlement, which is not an admission of liability, is subject to final documentation and Court approval. Counsel for the plaintiffs has agreed to dismiss without prejudice the claims of all other putative class members. The proposed settlement amount is not material.

We are also involved in various legal proceedings that are incidental to the conduct of our business. In the opinion of management, the amount of any liability with respect to these proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, will not be material.

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011, which could materially affect our business, financial condition, financial results or future performance. There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011.

None

None

In connection with the results of the non-binding advisory vote at the Company’s 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders concerning the frequency of an advisory vote on the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”), after consideration of the voting results and other factors, determined at a meeting held on September 7, 2011 that the Company will hold a non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of its named executive officers on an annual basis until the next required non-binding advisory vote on frequency, or until the Board elects to implement a different frequency for such advisory votes.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on September 8, 2011 on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.