AvalonBay Communities
AVB
#989
Rank
$24.61 B
Marketcap
$173.83
Share price
2.43%
Change (1 day)
-20.29%
Change (1 year)
AvalonBay Communities, Inc. is an American real estate investment trust (REIT) that invests in apartments.

AvalonBay Communities - 10-K annual report


Text size:
 

 
 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
Commission file number 1-12672
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
   
Maryland 77-0404318
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
2900 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite 300
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
(Address of principal executive office)
(703) 329-6300
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
   
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share New York Stock Exchange
8.70% Series H Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, New York Stock Exchange
par value $.01 per share  
(Title of each class) (Name of each exchange on which registered)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes x       No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes o       No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve (12) months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x       No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the Exchange registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Large accelerated filer x       Accelerated filer o       Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes o       No x
The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, held by nonaffiliates of the registrant, as of June 30, 2006 was $8,231,895,376.
The number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, outstanding as of January 31, 2007 was 79,344,557.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of AvalonBay Communities, Inc.’s Proxy Statement for the 2007 annual meeting of stockholders, a definitive copy of which will be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the year end of the year covered by this Form 10-K, are incorporated by reference herein as portions of Part III of this Form 10-K.
 
 

 


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS
       
    PAGE 
 
PART I
  
 
    
ITEM 1. 
BUSINESS
  1 
  
 
    
ITEM 1a. 
RISK FACTORS
  8 
  
 
    
ITEM 1b. 
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
  15 
  
 
    
ITEM 2. 
COMMUNITIES
  16 
  
 
    
ITEM 3. 
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
  43 
  
 
    
ITEM 4. 
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
  43 
  
 
    
PART II
  
 
    
ITEM 5. 
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
  44 
  
 
    
ITEM 6. 
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
  46 
  
 
    
ITEM 7. 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
  49 
  
 
    
ITEM 7a. 
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
  66 
  
 
    
ITEM 8. 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
  68 
  
 
    
ITEM 9. 
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
  68 
  
 
    
ITEM 9a. 
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
  68 
  
 
    
ITEM 9b. 
OTHER INFORMATION
  68 
  
 
    
PART III
  
 
    
ITEM 10. 
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
  69 
  
 
    
ITEM 11. 
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
  69 
  
 
    
ITEM 12. 
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
  69 
  
 
    
ITEM 13. 
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
  70 
  
 
    
ITEM 14. 
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
  70 
  
 
    
PART IV
  
 
    
ITEM 15. 
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
  71 
  
 
    
SIGNATURES  76 

 


 

PART I
This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our actual results could differ materially from those set forth in each forward-looking statement. Certain factors that might cause such a difference are discussed in this report, including in the section entitled “Forward-Looking Statements” on page 65 of this Form 10-K. You should also review Item 1a., “Risk Factors,” for a discussion of various risks that could adversely affect us.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General
AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (the “Company,” which term, unless the context otherwise requires, refers to AvalonBay Communities, Inc. together with its subsidiaries) is a Maryland corporation that has elected to be treated as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, for federal income tax purposes. We engage in the development, redevelopment, acquisition, ownership and operation of multifamily communities in high barrier-to-entry markets of the United States. These barriers-to-entry generally include a difficult and lengthy entitlement process with local jurisdictions and dense urban or suburban areas where zoned and entitled land is in limited supply. Our markets are located in the Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, Midwest, Pacific Northwest, and Northern and Southern California regions of the United States. We focus on these markets because we believe that, long term, the limited new supply of apartment homes and lower housing affordability in these markets will result in larger increases in cash flows relative to other markets. In addition to increasing the rental revenues of our operating assets, we believe these market attributes will increase the value of our operating assets and enable us to create additional value through the development and selective acquisition of multifamily housing.
At January 31, 2007, we owned or held a direct or indirect ownership interest in:
  151 operating apartment communities containing 43,533 apartment homes in ten states and the District of Columbia, of which six communities containing 2,381 apartment homes were under reconstruction;
 
  17 communities under construction that are expected to contain an aggregate of 5,153 apartment homes when completed; and
 
  rights to develop an additional 54 communities that, if developed in the manner expected, will contain an estimated 14,185 apartment homes.
We generally obtain ownership in an apartment community by developing a new community on vacant land or by acquiring and either repositioning or redeveloping an existing community. In selecting sites for development, redevelopment or acquisition, we favor locations that are near expanding employment centers and convenient to transportation, recreation areas, entertainment, shopping and dining.
Our real estate investments consist of the following reportable segments: Established Communities, Other Stabilized Communities and Development/Redevelopment Communities. Established Communities are generally operating communities that are consolidated for financial reporting purposes and that were owned and had stabilized occupancy and operating expenses as of the beginning of the prior year. Other Stabilized Communities are generally all other operating communities that have stabilized occupancy and operating expenses during the current year, but that had not achieved stabilization as of the beginning of the prior year. Development/ Redevelopment Communities consist of communities that are under construction, communities where substantial redevelopment is in progress or is planned to begin during the current year and communities under lease-up. A more detailed description of these segments and other related information can be found in Note 9, “Segment Reporting,” of the Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Item 8 of this report.
Our principal financial goal is to increase long-term stockholder value by successfully and cost-effectively developing, redeveloping, acquiring, owning and operating high-quality communities in our selected markets that contain features and amenities desired by residents, as well as by providing our residents with efficient and effective service.

1


 

To help fulfill this goal, we regularly (i) monitor our investment allocation by geographic market and product type, (ii) develop, redevelop and acquire apartment communities in high barrier-to-entry markets with growing or high potential for demand and high for-sale housing costs, (iii) selectively sell apartment communities that no longer meet our long-term strategy or when opportunities are presented to realize a portion of the value created through our investment and redeploy the proceeds from those sales, and (iv) endeavor to maintain a capital structure that is aligned with our business risks such that we maintain continuous access to cost-effective capital. Our long-term strategy is to more deeply penetrate the high barrier-to-entry markets in our chosen regions with a broad range of products and services and an intense focus on our customer. A substantial majority of our current communities are upscale, which generally command among the highest rents in their markets. However, we also pursue the ownership and operation of apartment communities that target a variety of customer segments and price points, consistent with our goal of offering a broad range of products and services.
During the three years ended December 31, 2006, we acquired two apartment communities whose financial results are consolidated for financial reporting purposes, disposed of 16 apartment communities, and completed the development of 20 apartment communities and the redevelopment of six apartment communities. In anticipation of continued improvement in apartment fundamentals and to help position us for future growth, we increased our construction volume during 2006 (as measured by total projected capitalized cost at completion) and continued to secure new development opportunities, including the acquisition of land for future development. We also increased our investments in apartment communities through an institutional discretionary investment fund, AvalonBay Value Added Fund, L.P. (the “Fund”), which we manage and in which we own approximately a 15% interest. The Fund acquired communities that we believe we can redevelop or reposition, or take advantage of market cycle timing and improved operating performance, to create value. Since its inception in March 2005, the Fund has acquired 13 communities. A more detailed description of the Fund and its investment activity can be found in Financing Activities and Note 6, “Investments in Unconsolidated Entities” of the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report. As a result of strong capital flows to the industry, we also continued to dispose of assets at prices that enabled significant realized gains on cost.
In 2007, we expect additional new development activity to be in the range of $1,000,000,000 to $1,300,000,000, and we expect the Fund will continue to selectively acquire additional communities. We also anticipate asset sales, dependent on strategic and value realization opportunities. The level of development, acquisition and disposition activity, however, is heavily influenced by capital market conditions, including prevailing interest rates. A further discussion of our development, redevelopment, disposition, acquisition, property management and related strategies follows.
Development Strategy. We select land for development and follow established procedures that we believe minimize both the cost and the risks of development. As one of the largest developers of multifamily apartment communities in high barrier-to-entry markets of the United States, we identify development opportunities through local market presence and access to local market information achieved through our regional offices. In addition to our principal executive office in Alexandria, Virginia, we also maintain regional offices and administrative or specialty offices in or near the following cities:
  Boston, Massachusetts;
 
  Chicago, Illinois;
 
  Long Island, New York;
 
  Los Angeles, California;
 
  New York, New York;
 
  Newport Beach, California;
 
  San Jose, California;
 
  Seattle, Washington;
 
  Shelton, Connecticut; and
 
  Woodbridge, New Jersey.
After selecting a target site, we usually negotiate for the right to acquire the site either through an option or a long-term conditional contract. Options and long-term conditional contracts generally enable us to acquire the target site shortly before the start of construction, which reduces development-related risks and preserves capital. However, we will acquire and hold land when business conditions warrant. Due to increased competition for land based on current market conditions, we have, at times, acquired land earlier in the development cycle or acquired land zoned for uses other than residential with the potential for rezoning. After we acquire land, we generally shift our focus to construction. Except for certain mid-rise and high-rise apartment communities where we may elect to use third-party general contractors or construction managers, we act as our own general contractor and construction manager.

2


 

We generally perform these functions directly (although we may use a wholly-owned subsidiary) both for ourselves and for the joint ventures and partnerships of which we are a member or a partner. We believe this enables us to achieve higher construction quality, greater control over construction schedules and significant cost savings. Our development, property management and construction teams monitor construction progress to ensure high-quality workmanship and a smooth and timely transition into the leasing and operating phase.
As competition for desirable development opportunities has increased in recent years, we will in some cases be engaged in more complicated development pursuits. For example, at times we have acquired and may in the future acquire existing commercial buildings with the intent to pursue rezoning, tenant terminations or expirations and demolition of the existing structures. Generally, during the period that we hold these buildings for future development, the net revenue from these operations, which we consider to be incidental, is accounted for as a reduction in our investment in the development pursuit and not as net income. We have also participated, and may in the future participate, in master planned or other large multi-use developments where we commit to build infrastructure (such as roads) to be used by other participants or commit to act as construction manager or general contractor in building structures or spaces for third parties (such as municipal garages or parks). Costs we incur in connection with these activities may be accounted for as additional invested capital in the community or we may earn fee income for providing these services. Particularly with large scale, urban in-fill developments, we may engage in significant environmental remediation efforts to prepare a site for construction.
Throughout this report, the term “development” is used to refer to the entire property development cycle, including pursuit of zoning approvals, procurement of architectural and engineering designs and the construction process. References to “construction” refer to the actual construction of the property, which is only one element of the development cycle.
Redevelopment Strategy. When we undertake the redevelopment of a community, our goal is to renovate and/or rebuild an existing community so that our total investment is generally below replacement cost and the community is well positioned in the market to achieve attractive returns on our capital. We have established procedures to minimize both the cost and risks of redevelopment. Our redevelopment teams, which include key redevelopment, construction and property management personnel, monitor redevelopment progress. We believe we achieve significant cost savings by acting as our own general contractor. More importantly, this helps to ensure high-quality design and workmanship and a smooth and timely transition into the lease-up and restabilization phase.
Throughout this report, the term “redevelopment” is used to refer to the entire redevelopment cycle, including planning and procurement of architectural and engineering designs, budgeting and actual renovation work. The actual renovation work is referred to as “reconstruction,” which is only one element of the redevelopment cycle.
Disposition Strategy. We sell assets when market conditions are favorable and redeploy the proceeds from those sales to develop, redevelop and acquire communities and to rebalance our portfolio across geographic regions. This also allows us to realize a portion of the value created through our investments, and provides additional liquidity. We are then able to redeploy the net proceeds from our dispositions in lieu of raising that amount of capital externally by issuing debt or equity securities. When we decide to sell a community, we generally solicit competing bids from unrelated parties for these individual assets and consider the sales price of each proposal.
Acquisition Strategy. Our core competencies in development and redevelopment discussed above allow us to be selective in the acquisitions we target. Acquisitions allow us to achieve rapid penetration into markets in which we desire an increased presence. Acquisitions (and dispositions) also help us achieve our desired product mix or rebalance our portfolio. In 2005 we formed the Fund, which during its investment period (ending no later than March 2008) will be the principal vehicle for us to acquire additional investments in apartment communities, subject to certain exceptions. Through the Fund’s investment period (or until fully invested), we expect to continue our acquisition activity through the Fund, focusing in particular on communities in our markets that can benefit from redevelopment, repositioning or market cycle opportunities.
Property Management Strategy. We intend to increase operating income through innovative, proactive property management that will result in higher revenue from communities and controlled operating expenses.

3


 

Our principal strategies to maximize revenue include:
  strong focus on resident satisfaction;
 
  staggering lease terms such that lease expirations are better matched to traffic patterns;
 
  balancing high occupancy with premium pricing, and increasing rents as market conditions permit; and
 
  managing community occupancy for optimal rental revenue levels.
Controlling operating expenses is another way in which we intend to increase earnings growth. Growth in our portfolio and the resulting increase in revenue allows for fixed operating costs to be spread over a larger volume of revenue, thereby increasing operating margins. We control operating expenses in a variety of ways, which include the following, among others:
  we use purchase order controls, acquiring goods and services from pre-approved vendors;
 
  we purchase supplies in bulk where possible;
 
  we bid third-party contracts on a volume basis;
 
  we strive to retain residents through high levels of service in order to eliminate the cost of preparing an apartment home for a new resident and to reduce marketing and vacant apartment utility costs;
 
  we perform turnover work in-house or hire third parties, generally depending upon the least costly alternative;
 
  we undertake preventive maintenance regularly to maximize resident satisfaction and property and equipment life; and
 
  we aggressively pursue real estate tax appeals.
On-site property management teams receive bonuses based largely upon the net operating income produced at their respective communities. We use and continuously seek ways to improve technology applications to help manage our communities, believing that the accurate collection of financial and resident data will enable us to maximize revenue and control costs through careful leasing decisions, maintenance decisions and financial management.
We generally manage the operation and leasing activity of our communities directly (although we may use a wholly-owned subsidiary) both for ourselves and the joint ventures and partnerships of which we are a member or a partner.
From time to time, we also pursue or arrange ancillary services for our residents to provide additional revenue sources or increase resident satisfaction. In general, as a REIT we cannot directly provide services to our tenants that are not customarily provided by a landlord, nor can we share in the income of a third party that provides such services. However, we can provide such non-customary services to residents or share in the revenue from such services if we do so through a “taxable REIT subsidiary,” which is a subsidiary that is treated as a “C corporation” and is therefore subject to federal income taxes.
Financing Strategy. We have consistently maintained, and intend to continue to maintain, a capital structure that is aligned to the business risks presented by our corporate strategy. For the year ended December 31, 2006, our fixed charge ratio on an incurred and expensed basis was 1.90 and 2.68, respectively. We believe that fixed charge coverage is an important measure of balance sheet strength, as it measures our ability to service fixed payment obligations from operating cash flow. At December 31, 2006, our debt-to-total market capitalization was 22.3%, and our long-term floating rate debt was 3.4% of total market capitalization. Total market capitalization reflects the aggregate of the market value of our common stock, the market value of our operating partnership units outstanding (based on the market value of our common stock), the liquidation preference of our preferred stock and the outstanding principal amount of our debt. We believe that debt-to-total market capitalization can be one useful measure of a real estate operating company’s long-term liquidity and balance sheet strength, because it shows an approximate relationship between a company’s total debt and the current total market value of its assets based on the current price at which the company’s common stock trades. However, because debt-to-total market capitalization changes with fluctuations in our stock price, which occur regularly, our debt-to-total market capitalization may change even when our earnings and debt levels remain stable.

4


 

We estimate that a portion of our short-term liquidity needs will be met from retained operating cash and borrowings under our variable rate unsecured credit facility. If required to meet the balance of our current or anticipated liquidity needs, we will attempt to arrange additional capacity under our existing unsecured credit facility, sell existing communities or land and/or issue additional debt or equity securities. A determination to engage in an equity or debt offering depends on a variety of factors such as general market and economic conditions, including interest rates, our short and long term liquidity needs, the adequacy of our expected liquidity sources, the relative costs of debt and equity capital, and growth opportunities. A summary of debt and equity activity for the last three years is reflected on our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows of the Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Item 8 of this report.
We have entered into, and may continue in the future to enter into, joint ventures (including limited liability companies) or partnerships through which we would own an indirect economic interest of less than 100% of the community or communities owned directly by such joint venture or partnership. Our decision whether to hold an apartment community in fee simple or to have an indirect interest in the community through a joint venture or partnership is based on a variety of factors and considerations, including: (i) the economic and tax terms required by a seller of land or of a community, who may prefer that (or who may require less payment if) the land or community is contributed to a joint venture or partnership; (ii) our desire to diversify our portfolio of communities by market, submarket and product type; (iii) our desire at times to preserve our capital resources to maintain liquidity or balance sheet strength; and (iv) our projection, in some circumstances, that we will achieve higher returns on our invested capital or reduce our risk if a joint venture or partnership vehicle is used. Investments in joint ventures or partnerships are not limited to a specified percentage of our assets. Each joint venture or partnership agreement is individually negotiated, and our ability to operate and/or dispose of a community in our sole discretion may be limited to varying degrees depending on the terms of the joint venture or partnership agreement.
We have invested in the Fund, a private, discretionary investment vehicle that acquires and operates apartment communities in our markets. The Fund will serve, until March 16, 2008 or until 80% of its committed capital is invested, as the principal vehicle through which we will invest in the acquisition of apartment communities, subject to certain exceptions. These exceptions include significant individual asset and portfolio acquisitions, properties acquired in tax-deferred transactions and acquisitions that are inadvisable or inappropriate for the Fund. The Fund will not restrict our development activities, and will terminate after a term of eight years, subject to two one-year extensions. The Fund has nine institutional investors, including us, with a combined equity capital commitment of $330,000,000. A significant portion of the investments made in the Fund by its investors are being made through AvalonBay Value Added Fund, Inc., a Maryland corporation that qualifies as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code (the “Fund REIT”). A wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company is the general partner of the Fund and has committed $50,000,000 to the Fund and the Fund REIT (of which approximately $22,944,000 has been invested as of January 31, 2007) representing a 15.2% combined general partner and limited partner equity interest. Under the Fund documents, the Fund has the ability to employ leverage through debt financings up to 65% on a portfolio basis, which, if achieved, would enable the Fund to invest up to $940,000,000. We currently expect that leverage of less than 65% will be employed, reducing the projected investment value to between $850,000,000 and $900,000,000 (of which approximately $514,000,000 has been invested as of January 31, 2007).
In addition, we may, from time to time, offer shares of our equity securities, debt securities or options to purchase stock in exchange for property.
Other Strategies and Activities. While we emphasize equity real estate investments in rental apartment communities, we have the ability to invest in other types of real estate, mortgages (including participating or convertible mortgages), securities of other REITs or real estate operating companies, or securities of technology companies that relate to our real estate operations or of companies that provide services to us or our residents, in each case consistent with our qualification as a REIT. On occasion, we own and operate retail space at our communities when either (i) the highest and best use of the space is for retail (e.g., street level in an urban area) or (ii) we believe the retail space will enhance the attractiveness of the community to residents. As of December 31, 2006, we had a total of 327,010 square feet of rentable retail space that produced gross rental revenue in 2006 of $5,258,000 (0.7% of total revenue). If we secure a development right and believe that its best use, in whole or in part, is to develop the real estate with the intent to sell rather than hold the asset, we may, through a taxable REIT subsidiary, develop real estate for sale. At present, we expect to develop with the intent to sell, directly through a taxable REIT subsidiary or indirectly through a joint venture partnership, one or more land parcels. Any investment in securities of other entities, and any development of real estate for sale, is subject to the percentage of ownership limitations, gross income tests, and other limitations that must be observed for REIT qualification.

5


 

We have not engaged in trading, underwriting or agency distribution or sale of securities of other issuers and do not intend to do so. At all times we intend to make investments in a manner so as to qualify as a REIT unless, because of circumstances or changes to the Internal Revenue Code (or the Treasury Regulations), the Board of Directors determines that it is no longer in our best interest to qualify as a REIT.
Inflation and Deflation
Substantially all of our apartment leases are for a term of one year or less. In an inflationary environment, this may allow us to realize increased rents upon renewal of existing leases or the beginning of new leases. Short-term leases generally minimize our risk from the adverse effects of inflation, although these leases generally permit residents to leave at the end of the lease term and therefore expose us to the effect of a decline in market rents. In a deflationary rent environment, we may be exposed to declining rents more quickly under these shorter-term leases.
Tax Matters
We filed an election with our 1994 federal income tax return to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and intend to maintain our qualification as a REIT in the future. As a qualified REIT, with limited exceptions, we will not be taxed under federal and certain state income tax laws at the corporate level on our net income to the extent net income is distributed to our stockholders. We expect to make sufficient distributions to avoid income tax at the corporate level. While we believe that we are organized and qualified as a REIT and we intend to operate in a manner that will allow us to continue to qualify as a REIT, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in this regard. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code for which there are limited judicial and administrative interpretations and involves the determination of a variety of factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control.
Competition
We face competition from other real estate investors, including insurance companies, pension and investment funds, partnerships and investment companies and other apartment REITs, to acquire and develop apartment communities and acquire land for future development. As an owner and operator of apartment communities, we also face competition for prospective residents from other operators whose communities may be perceived to offer a better location or better amenities or whose rent may be perceived as a better value proposition given the quality, location and amenities that the resident seeks. We also compete with the condominium and single-family home markets. Although we often compete against large sophisticated developers and operators for development opportunities and for prospective residents, real estate developers and operators of any size can provide effective competition for both real estate assets and potential residents.
Environmental and Related Matters
As a current or prior owner, operator and developer of real estate, we are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws, regulations and ordinances and also could be liable to third parties resulting from environmental contamination or noncompliance at our communities. For some development communities, we undertake extensive environmental remediation to prepare the site for construction, which could be a significant portion of our total construction cost. Environmental remediation efforts could expose us to possible liabilities for accidents or improper handling of contaminated materials during construction. These and other risks related to environmental matters are described in more detail in Item 1a., “Risk Factors”.

6


 

Other Information
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any document we file at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the Public Reference Room. Our SEC filings are also available to the public from the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. In addition, you may read our SEC fillings at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), which is located at 20 Board Street, New York, New York 10005. Our SEC filings are available at the NYSE because our common stock and an outstanding series of preferred stock are listed on the NYSE.
We maintain a website at www.avalonbay.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available free of charge in the “Investor Relations” section of our website as soon as reasonably practicable after the reports are filed with or furnished to the SEC. In addition, the charters of our Board’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, Audit Committee and Compensation Committee, as well as our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Conduct, are available free of charge in that section of our website or by writing to AvalonBay Communities, Inc., 2900 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite 300, Alexandria, Virginia 22314, Attention: Chief Financial Officer.
We were incorporated under the laws of the State of California in 1978. In 1995, we reincorporated in the State of Maryland and have been focused on the ownership and operation of apartment communities since that time. As of December 31, 2006, we had 1,767 employees.

7


 

ITEM 1a. RISK FACTORS
Our operations involve various risks that could have adverse consequences, including those described below. This Item 1a includes forward-looking statements. You should refer to our discussion of the qualifications and limitations on forward-looking statements on page 65.
Development, redevelopment and construction risks could affect our profitability.
We intend to continue to develop and redevelop apartment home communities. These activities can include long planning and entitlement timelines and can involve complex and costly activities, including significant environmental remediation or construction work in high-density urban areas. These activities may be exposed to the following risks:
  we may be unable to obtain, or experience delays in obtaining, necessary zoning, occupancy, or other required governmental or third party permits and authorizations, which could result in increased costs or the delay or abandonment of opportunities;
 
  we may abandon opportunities that we have already begun to explore for a number of reasons, including changes in local market conditions or increases in construction or financing costs, and, as a result, we may fail to recover expenses already incurred in exploring those opportunities;
 
  we may incur costs that exceed our original estimates due to increased material, labor or other costs;
 
  occupancy rates and rents at a community may fail to meet our expectations for a number of reasons, including changes in market and economic conditions beyond our control and the development by competitors of competing communities;
 
  we may be unable to complete construction and lease up of a community on schedule, resulting in increased construction and financing costs and a decrease in expected rental revenues;
 
  we may be unable to obtain financing with favorable terms, or at all, for the proposed development of a community, which may cause us to delay or abandon an opportunity;
 
  we may incur liabilities to third parties during the development process, for example, in connection with managing existing improvements on the site prior to tenant terminations and demolition (such as commercial space) or in connection with providing services to third parties, such as the construction of shared infrastructure or other improvements; and
 
  we may incur liability if our communities are not constructed and operated in compliance with the accessibility provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Acts, the Fair Housing Act or other federal, state or local requirements. Noncompliance could result in imposition of fines, an award of damages to private litigants, and a requirement that we undertake structural modifications to remedy the noncompliance. We are currently engaged in a lawsuit alleging noncompliance with these statutes. See “Legal Proceedings.”
We project construction costs based on market conditions at the time we prepare our budgets, and our projections include changes that we anticipate but cannot predict with certainty. Construction costs have been increasing, particularly for materials such as steel, concrete and lumber, and, for some of our Development Communities and Development Rights, the total construction costs may be higher than the original budget. Total capitalized cost includes all capitalized costs projected to be incurred to develop or redevelop a community, determined in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), including:
  land and/or property acquisition costs;
 
  construction or reconstruction costs;
 
  costs of environmental remediation;
 
  real estate taxes;
 
  capitalized interest;
 
  loan fees;
 
  permits;
 
  professional fees;
 
  allocated development or redevelopment overhead; and
 
  other regulatory fees.

8


 

Costs to redevelop communities that have been acquired have, in some cases, exceeded our original estimates and similar increases in costs may be experienced in the future. We cannot assure you that market rents in effect at the time new development or redevelopment communities complete lease-up will be sufficient to fully offset the effects of any increased construction or reconstruction costs.
Unfavorable changes in market and economic conditions could hurt occupancy or rental rates.
Local conditions in our markets significantly affect occupancy or rental rates at our communities. The risks that may adversely affect conditions in those markets include the following:
  plant closings, industry slowdowns and other factors that adversely affect the local economy;
 
  an oversupply of, or a reduced demand for, apartment homes;
 
  a decline in household formation or employment or lack of employment growth;
 
  the inability or unwillingness of residents to pay rent increases; and
 
  rent control or rent stabilization laws, or other laws regulating housing, that could prevent us from raising rents to offset increases in operating costs.
Changes in applicable laws, or noncompliance with applicable laws, could adversely affect our operations or expose us to liability.
We must operate our communities in compliance with numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations, including landlord tenant laws and other laws generally applicable to business operations. Noncompliance with laws could expose us to liability.
Compliance with changes in (i) laws increasing the potential liability for environmental conditions existing on properties or the restrictions on discharges or other conditions, (ii) rent control or rent stabilization laws or (iii) other governmental rules and regulations or enforcement policies affecting the use and operation of our communities, including changes to building codes and fire and life-safety codes, may result in lower revenue growth or significant unanticipated expenditures.
Short-term leases expose us to the effects of declining market rents.
Substantially all of our apartment leases are for a term of one year or less. Because these leases generally permit the residents to leave at the end of the lease term without penalty, our rental revenues are impacted by declines in market rents more quickly than if our leases were for longer terms.
Competition could limit our ability to lease apartment homes or increase or maintain rents.
Our apartment communities compete with other housing alternatives to attract residents, including other rental apartments, condominiums and single-family homes that are available for rent, as well as new and existing condominiums and single-family homes for sale. Competitive residential housing in a particular area could adversely affect our ability to lease apartment homes and to increase or maintain rental rates.
Attractive investment opportunities may not be available, which could adversely affect our profitability.
We expect that other real estate investors, including insurance companies, pension funds, other REITs and other well-capitalized investors, will compete with us to acquire existing properties and to develop new properties. This competition could increase prices for properties of the type we would likely pursue and adversely affect our profitability.

9


 

Insufficient cash flow could affect our debt financing and create refinancing risk.
We are subject to the risks associated with debt financing, including the risk that our cash flow will be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest. In this regard, we note that we are required to annually distribute dividends generally equal to at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and our net capital gain, in order for us to continue to qualify as a REIT, and this requirement limits the amount of our cash flow available to meet required principal and interest payments. The principal outstanding balance on a portion of our debt will not be fully amortized prior to its maturity. Although we may be able to repay our debt by using our cash flows, we cannot assure you that we will have sufficient cash flows available to make all required principal payments. Therefore, we may need to refinance at least a portion of our outstanding debt as it matures. There is a risk that we may not be able to refinance existing debt or that a refinancing will not be done on as favorable terms, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Rising interest rates could increase interest costs and could affect the market price of our common stock.
We currently have, and may in the future, incur variable interest rate debt. Accordingly, if interest rates increase, our interest costs will also rise, unless we have made arrangements that hedge the risk of rising interest rates. In addition, an increase in market interest rates may lead purchasers of our common stock to demand a greater annual dividend yield, which could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Bond financing and zoning compliance requirements could limit our income, restrict the use of communities and cause favorable financing to become unavailable.
We have financed some of our apartment communities with obligations issued by local government agencies because the interest paid to the holders of this debt is generally exempt from federal income taxes and, therefore, the interest rate is generally more favorable to us. These obligations are commonly referred to as “tax-exempt bonds” and generally must be secured by communities. As a condition to obtaining tax-exempt financing, or on occasion as a condition to obtaining favorable zoning in some jurisdictions, we will commit to make some of the apartments in a community available to households whose income does not exceed certain thresholds (e.g., 50% or 80% of area median income), or who meet other qualifying tests. As of December 31, 2006, approximately 7% of our apartment homes at current operating communities were under use limitations such as these. These commitments, which may run without expiration or may expire after a period of time (such as 15 or 20 years) may limit our ability to raise rents aggressively and, in consequence, can also limit increases in the value of the communities subject to these restrictions.
In addition, some of our tax-exempt bond financing documents require us to obtain a guarantee from a financial institution of payment of the principal of, and interest on, the bonds. The guarantee may take the form of a letter of credit, surety bond, guarantee agreement or other additional collateral. If the financial institution defaults in its guarantee obligations, or if we are unable to renew the applicable guarantee or otherwise post satisfactory collateral, a default will occur under the applicable tax-exempt bonds and the community could be foreclosed upon.
Risks related to indebtedness.
We have a $650,000,000 revolving variable rate unsecured credit facility with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and Wachovia Bank, N.A., serving together as syndication agent and as banks, Bank of America, N.A., serving as administrative agent, swing lender, issuing bank and a bank, Morgan Stanley Bank, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, serving collectively as documentation agent and as banks, and a syndicate of other financial institutions, serving as banks. Our organizational documents do not limit the amount or percentage of indebtedness that may be incurred. Accordingly, subject to compliance with outstanding debt covenants, we could incur more debt, resulting in an increased risk of default on our obligations and an increase in debt service requirements that could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

10


 

The mortgages on those of our properties subject to secured debt, our unsecured credit facility and the indentures under which a substantial portion of our debt was issued contain customary restrictions, requirements and other limitations, as well as certain financial and operating covenants including maintenance of certain financial ratios. Maintaining compliance with these restrictions could limit our flexibility. A default in these requirements, if uncured, could result in a requirement that we repay indebtedness, which could severely affect our liquidity and increase our financing costs.
Failure to generate sufficient revenue could limit cash flow available for distributions to stockholders.
A decrease in rental revenue could have an adverse effect on our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders and our ability to maintain our status as a REIT. Significant expenditures associated with each community such as debt service payments, if any, real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance costs are generally not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in income from a community.
Debt financing may not be available and equity issuances could be dilutive to our stockholders.
Our ability to execute our business strategy depends on our access to an appropriate blend of debt and equity financing. Debt financing may not be available in sufficient amounts or on favorable terms. If we issue additional equity securities, the interests of existing stockholders could be diluted.
Difficulty of selling apartment communities could limit flexibility.
Federal tax laws may limit our ability to earn a gain on the sale of a community (unless we own it through a subsidiary which will incur a taxable gain upon sale) if we are found to have held, acquired or developed the community primarily with the intent to resell the community, and this limitation may affect our ability to sell communities without adversely affecting returns to our stockholders. In addition, real estate in our markets can at times be hard to sell, especially if market conditions are poor. These potential difficulties in selling real estate in our markets may limit our ability to change or reduce the apartment communities in our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions.
Acquisitions may not yield anticipated results.
Subject to the requirements related to the Fund, we may in the future acquire apartment communities on a select basis. Our acquisition activities and their success may be exposed to the following risks:
  an acquired property may fail to perform as we expected in analyzing our investment; and
 
  our estimate of the costs of repositioning or redeveloping an acquired property may prove inaccurate.
Failure to succeed in new markets or in activities other than the development, ownership and operation of residential rental communities may have adverse consequences.
We may from time to time commence development activity or make acquisitions outside of our existing market areas if appropriate opportunities arise. As noted in the business description above, we also own and operate retail space when a retail component represents the best use of the space, as is often the case with large urban in-fill developments. Also as noted in the business description above, we expect to develop, through a taxable REIT subsidiary, directly or through a joint venture partnership, one or more parcels with the intent to sell, which we believe represents the best use for those parcels. Our historical experience in our existing markets in developing, owning and operating rental communities does not ensure that we will be able to operate successfully in new markets, should we choose to enter them, or that we will be successful in these other activities. We may be exposed to a variety of risks if we choose to enter new markets, including an inability to evaluate accurately local apartment market conditions; an inability to obtain land for development or to identify appropriate acquisition opportunities; an inability to hire and retain key personnel; and lack of familiarity with local governmental and permitting procedures. We may be unsuccessful in owning and operating retail space at our communities or in developing real estate with the intent to sell.

11


 

Risks involved in real estate activity through joint ventures.
Instead of acquiring or developing apartment communities directly, at times we invest as a partner or a co-venturer. Partnership or joint venture investments involve risks, including the possibility that our partner might become insolvent or otherwise refuse to make capital contributions when due; that we may be responsible to our partner for indemnifiable losses; that our partner might at any time have business goals which are inconsistent with ours; and that our partner may be in a position to take action or withhold consent contrary to our instructions or requests. Frequently, we and our partner may each have the right to trigger a buy-sell arrangement, which could cause us to sell our interest, or acquire our partner’s interest, at a time when we otherwise would not have initiated such a transaction.
Risks associated with an investment in and management of a discretionary investment fund.
We have formed the Fund which, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we manage as the general partner and to which we have committed $50,000,000, representing an approximate 15% equity interest. This presents risks, including the following:
  investors in the Fund may fail to make their capital contributions when due and, as a result, the Fund may be unable to execute its investment objectives;
 
  our subsidiary that is the general partner of the Fund is generally liable, under partnership law, for the debts and obligations of the Fund, subject to certain exculpation and indemnification rights pursuant to the terms of the partnership agreement of the Fund;
 
  investors in the Fund holding a majority of the partnership interests may remove us as the general partner without cause, subject to our right to receive an additional nine months of management fees after such removal and our right to acquire one of the properties then held by the Fund;
 
  while we have broad discretion to manage the Fund and make investment decisions on behalf of the Fund, the investors or an advisory committee comprised of representatives of the investors must approve certain matters, and as a result we may be unable to cause the Fund to make certain investments or implement certain decisions that we consider beneficial;
 
  we can develop communities but are generally prohibited from making acquisitions of apartment communities outside of the Fund until the earlier of March 16, 2008 or until 80% of the Fund’s committed capital is invested, subject to certain exceptions; and
 
  we may be liable if either the Fund, or the REIT through which a number of investors have invested in the Fund and which we manage, fails to comply with various tax or other regulatory matters.
Risk of earthquake damage.
As further described in Item 2., “Communities – Insurance and Risk of Uninsured Losses,” many of our West Coast communities are located in the general vicinity of active earthquake faults. We cannot assure you that an earthquake would not cause damage or losses greater than insured levels. In the event of a loss in excess of insured limits, we could lose our capital invested in the affected community, as well as anticipated future revenue from that community. We would also continue to be obligated to repay any mortgage indebtedness or other obligations related to the community. Any such loss could materially and adversely affect our business and our financial condition and results of operations.
Insurance coverage for earthquakes is expensive due to limited industry capacity. As a result, we may experience shortages in desired coverage levels if market conditions are such that insurance is not available.
A significant uninsured property or liability loss could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
In addition to the earthquake insurance discussed above, we carry commercial general liability insurance, property insurance and terrorism insurance with respect to our communities on terms we consider commercially reasonable.

12


 

There are, however, certain types of losses (such as losses arising from acts of war) that are not insured, in full or in part, because they are either uninsurable or the cost of insurance makes it, in management’s view, economically impractical. If an uninsured property loss or a property loss in excess of insured limits were to occur, we could lose our capital invested in a community, as well as the anticipated future revenues from such community. We would also continue to be obligated to repay any mortgage indebtedness or other obligations related to the community. If an uninsured liability to a third party were to occur, we would incur the cost of defense and settlement with, or court ordered damages to, that third party. A significant uninsured property or liability loss could materially and adversely affect our business and our financial condition and results of operations.
We may incur costs and increased expenses to repair property damage resulting from inclement weather.
Particularly in the Northeast and Midwest we are exposed to risks associated with inclement winter weather, including increased costs for the removal of snow and ice as well as from delays in construction. In addition, inclement weather could increase the need for maintenance and repair of our communities.
We may incur costs due to environmental contamination or non-compliance.
Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, regulations and ordinances, we may be required, regardless of knowledge or responsibility, to investigate and remediate the effects of hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum product releases at our properties and may be held liable under these laws or common law to a governmental entity or to third parties for property, personal injury or natural resources damages and for investigation and remediation costs incurred as a result of the contamination. These damages and costs may be substantial. The presence of such substances, or the failure to properly remediate the contamination, may adversely affect our ability to borrow against, sell or rent the affected property.
In addition, some environmental laws create a lien on the contaminated site in favor of the government for damages and costs it incurs as a result of the contamination.
The development, construction and operation of our communities are subject to regulations and permitting under various federal, state and local laws, regulations and ordinances, which regulate matters including wetlands protection, storm water runoff and wastewater discharge. Noncompliance with such laws and regulations may subject us to fines and penalties. We do not currently anticipate that we will incur any material liabilities as a result of noncompliance with these laws.
Certain federal, state and local laws, regulations and ordinances govern the removal, encapsulation or disturbance of asbestos containing materials (“ACMs”) when such materials are in poor condition or in the event of renovation or demolition of a building. These laws and the common law may impose liability for release of ACMs and may allow third parties to seek recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injury associated with exposure to ACMs. We are not aware that any ACMs were used in the construction of the communities we developed. ACMs were, however, used in the construction of several of the communities that we acquired. We implement an operations and maintenance program at each of the communities at which ACMs are detected. We do not currently anticipate that we will incur any material liabilities as a result of the presence of ACMs at our communities.
We are aware that some of our communities have lead paint and have implemented an operations and maintenance program at each of those communities. We do not currently anticipate that we will incur any material liabilities as a result of the presence of lead paint at our communities.
All of our stabilized operating communities, and all of the communities that we are currently developing or redeveloping, have been subjected to at least a Phase I or similar environmental assessment, which generally does not involve invasive techniques such as soil or ground water sampling. These assessments, together with subsurface assessments conducted on some properties, have not revealed, and we are not otherwise aware of, any environmental conditions that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our business, assets, financial condition or results of operation. In connection with our ownership, operation and development of communities, from time to time we undertake substantial remedial action in response to the presence of subsurface or other contaminants. In some cases, an indemnity exists upon which we may be able to rely if environmental liability arises from the contamination or remediation costs exceed estimates.

13


 

There can be no assurance, however, that all necessary remediation actions have been or will be undertaken at our properties or that we will be indemnified, in full or at all, in the event that environmental liability arises.
Mold growth may occur when excessive moisture accumulates in buildings or on building materials, particularly if the moisture problem remains undiscovered or is not addressed over a period of time. Although the occurrence of mold at multifamily and other structures, and the need to remediate such mold, is not a new phenomenon, there has been increased awareness in recent years that certain molds may in some instances lead to adverse health effects, including allergic or other reactions. To help limit mold growth, we educate residents about the importance of adequate ventilation and request or require that they notify us when they see mold or excessive moisture. We have established procedures for promptly addressing and remediating mold or excessive moisture from apartment homes when we become aware of its presence regardless of whether we or the resident believe a health risk is presented. However, we cannot provide assurance that mold or excessive moisture will be detected and remediated in a timely manner. If a significant mold problem arises at one of our communities, we could be required to undertake a costly remediation program to contain or remove the mold from the affected community and could be exposed to other liabilities.
Additionally, we have occasionally been involved in developing, managing, leasing and operating various properties for third parties. Consequently, we may be considered to have been an operator of such properties and, therefore, potentially liable for removal or remediation costs or other potential costs which could relate to hazardous or toxic substances. We are not aware of any material environmental liabilities with respect to properties managed or developed by us or our predecessors for such third parties.
We cannot assure you that:
  the environmental assessments described above have identified all potential environmental liabilities;
 
  no prior owner created any material environmental condition not known to us or the consultants who prepared the assessments;
 
  no environmental liabilities have developed since the environmental assessments were prepared;
 
  the condition of land or operations in the vicinity of our communities, such as the presence of underground storage tanks, will not affect the environmental condition of our communities;
 
  future uses or conditions, including, without limitation, changes in applicable environmental laws and regulations, will not result in the imposition of environmental liability; and
 
  no environmental liabilities will arise at communities that we have sold for which we may have liability.
Failure to qualify as a REIT would cause us to be taxed as a corporation, which would significantly reduce funds available for distribution to stockholders.
If we fail to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we will be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates (subject to any applicable alternative minimum tax). In addition, unless we are entitled to relief under applicable statutory provisions, we would be ineligible to make an election for treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which we lose our qualification. The additional tax liability resulting from the failure to qualify as a REIT would significantly reduce or eliminate the amount of funds available for distribution to our stockholders. Furthermore, we would no longer be required to make distributions to our stockholders. Thus, our failure to qualify as a REIT could also impair our ability to expand our business and raise capital, and would adversely affect the value of our common stock.
We believe that we are organized and qualified as a REIT, and we intend to operate in a manner that will allow us to continue to qualify as a REIT. However, we cannot assure you that we are qualified as a REIT, or that we will remain qualified in the future. This is because qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code for which there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations and involves the determination of a variety of factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control. In addition, future legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions may significantly change the tax laws or the application of the tax laws with respect to qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes or the federal income tax consequences of this qualification.

14


 

Even if we qualify as a REIT, we will be subject to certain federal, state and local taxes on our income and property and on taxable income that we do not distribute to our shareholders. In addition, we may engage in activities through taxable subsidiaries and will be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates on the income of those subsidiaries.
The ability of our stockholders to control our policies and effect a change of control of our company is limited by certain provisions of our charter and bylaws and by Maryland law.
There are provisions in our charter and bylaws that may discourage a third party from making a proposal to acquire us, even if some of our stockholders might consider the proposal to be in their best interests. These provisions include the following:
Our charter authorizes our Board of Directors to issue up to 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock without stockholder approval and to establish the preferences and rights, including voting rights, of any series of preferred stock issued. The Board of Directors may issue preferred stock without stockholder approval, which could allow the Board to issue one or more classes or series of preferred stock that could discourage or delay a tender offer or a change in control.
To maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, not more than 50% in value of our outstanding stock may be owned, directly or indirectly, by or for five or fewer individuals at any time during the last half of any taxable year. To maintain this qualification, and to otherwise address concerns about concentrations of ownership of our stock, our charter generally prohibits ownership (directly, indirectly by virtue of the attribution provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, or beneficially as defined in Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act) by any single stockholder of more than 9.8% of the issued and outstanding shares of any class or series of our stock. In general, under our charter, pension plans and mutual funds may directly and beneficially own up to 15% of the outstanding shares of any class or series of stock. Under our charter, our Board of Directors may in its sole discretion waive or modify the ownership limit for one or more persons. These ownership limits may prevent or delay a change in control and, as a result, could adversely affect our stockholders’ ability to realize a premium for their shares of common stock.
Our bylaws provide that the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of all of the shares entitled to be cast in the election of directors is required to elect a director. In a contested election, if no nominee receives the vote of holders of a majority of all of the shares entitled to be cast, the incumbent directors would remain in office. This requirement may prevent or delay a change in control and, as a result, could adversely affect our stockholders’ ability to realize a premium for their shares of common stock.
As a Maryland corporation, we are subject to the provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law. Maryland law imposes restrictions on some business combinations and requires compliance with statutory procedures before some mergers and acquisitions may occur, which may delay or prevent offers to acquire us or increase the difficulty of completing any offers, even if they are in our stockholders’ best interests. In addition, other provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law permit the Board of Directors to make elections and to take actions without stockholder approval (such as classifying our Board such that the entire Board is not up for reelection annually) that, if made or taken, could have the effect of discouraging or delaying a change in control.
ITEM 1b.     UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.

15


 

ITEM 2.       COMMUNITIES
Our real estate investments consist primarily of current operating apartment communities, communities in various stages of development (“Development Communities”) and Development Rights as defined below. Our current operating communities are further distinguished as Established Communities, Other Stabilized Communities, Lease-Up Communities and Redevelopment Communities. The following is a description of each category:
Current Communities are categorized as Established, Other Stabilized, Lease-Up, or Redevelopment according to the following attributes:
  Established Communities (also known as Same Store Communities) are consolidated communities where a comparison of operating results from the prior year to the current year is meaningful, as these communities were owned and had stabilized occupancy and operating expenses as of the beginning of the prior year. For the year ended December 31, 2006, the Established Communities are communities that are consolidated for financial reporting purposes, had stabilized occupancy and operating expenses as of January 1, 2005, are not conducting or planning to conduct substantial redevelopment activities and are not held for sale or planned for disposition within the current year. A community is considered to have stabilized occupancy at the earlier of (i) attainment of 95% physical occupancy or (ii) the one-year anniversary of completion of development or redevelopment.
 
  Other Stabilized Communities includes all other completed communities that we own or have a direct or indirect ownership interest in, and that have stabilized occupancy, as defined above. Other Stabilized Communities do not include communities that are conducting or planning to conduct substantial redevelopment activities within the current year.
 
  Lease-Up Communities are communities where construction has been complete for less than one year and where physical occupancy has not reached 95%.
 
  Redevelopment Communities are communities where substantial redevelopment is in progress or is planned to begin during the current year. For communities that we wholly own, redevelopment is considered substantial when capital invested during the reconstruction effort is expected to exceed the lesser of $5,000,000 or 10% of the community’s acquisition cost. The definition of substantial redevelopment may differ for communities owned through a joint venture arrangement.
Development Communities are communities that are under construction and for which a final certificate of occupancy has not been received. These communities may be partially complete and operating.
Development Rights are development opportunities in the early phase of the development process for which we either have an option to acquire land or enter into a leasehold interest, for which we are the buyer under a long-term conditional contract to purchase land or where we own land to develop a new community. We capitalize related pre-development costs incurred in pursuit of new developments for which we currently believe future development is probable.
In addition, we own approximately 60,000 square feet of office space in Alexandria, Virginia, for our corporate office, with all other regional and administrative offices leased under operating leases.

16


 

As of December 31, 2006, communities that we owned or held a direct or indirect interest in were classified as follows:
         
  Number of Number of
  communities apartment homes
 
    
Current Communities
        
 
        
Established Communities:
        
Northeast
  35   8,674 
Mid-Atlantic
  17   5,413 
Midwest
  3   887 
Pacific Northwest
  10   2,500 
Northern California
  29   8,450 
Southern California
  11   3,430 
 
      
Total Established
  105   29,354 
 
      
 
        
Other Stabilized Communities:
        
Northeast
  19   6,088 
Mid-Atlantic
  5   1,397 
Midwest
  2   460 
Pacific Northwest
  1   211 
Northern California
  3   603 
Southern California
  7   2,128 
 
      
Total Other Stabilized
  37   10,887 
 
      
 
        
Lease-Up Communities
  2   519 
 
        
Redevelopment Communities
  6   2,381 
 
      
 
        
Total Current Communities
  150   43,141 
 
      
 
        
Development Communities
  17   5,153 
 
      
 
        
Development Rights
  54   14,185 
 
      
Our holdings under each of the above categories are discussed on the following pages.
Current Communities
Our Current Communities are primarily garden-style apartment communities consisting of two and three-story buildings in landscaped settings. In January 2007, the Fund acquired one community containing 392 apartment homes. The Current Communities, as of January 31, 2007, include 115 garden-style (of which 15 are mixed communities and include townhomes), 21 high-rise and 15 mid-rise apartment communities. The Current Communities offer many attractive amenities including some or all of the following:
  vaulted ceilings;
 
  lofts;
 
  fireplaces;
 
  patios/decks; and
 
  modern appliances.
     Other features at various communities may include:
  swimming pools;
 
  fitness centers;
 
  tennis courts; and
 
  business centers.
We also have an extensive and ongoing maintenance program to keep all communities and apartment homes substantially free of deferred maintenance and, where vacant, available for immediate occupancy.

17


 

We believe that the aesthetic appeal of our communities and a service oriented property management team, focused on the specific needs of residents, enhances market appeal to discriminating residents. We believe this will ultimately achieve higher rental rates and occupancy levels while minimizing resident turnover and operating expenses.
Our Current Communities are located in the following geographic markets:
                         
  Number of Number of apartment Percentage of total
  communities at homes at apartment homes at
  1-1-06 1-31-07 1-1-06 1-31-07 1-1-06 1-31-07
 
                  
 
                        
Northeast
  55   56   15,671   15,732   37.8%  36.1%
Boston, MA
  18   18   4,514   4,490   10.9%  10.3%
Fairfield County, CT
  16   14   4,375   3,812   10.6%  8.8%
Long Island, NY
  3   6   915   1,621   2.2%  3.7%
Northern New Jersey
  3   3   1,182   1,182   2.9%  2.7%
Central New Jersey
  5   6   1,752   2,042   4.2%  4.7%
New York, NY
  10   9   2,933   2,585   7.1%  5.9%
 
                        
Mid-Atlantic
  21   24   6,859   7,622   16.6%  17.5%
Baltimore, MD
  6   9   1,224   1,987   3.0%  4.6%
Washington, DC
  15   15   5,635   5,635   13.6%  12.9%
 
                        
Midwest
  6   7   1,696   1,952   4.1%  4.5%
Chicago, IL
  6   7   1,696   1,952   4.1%  4.5%
 
                        
Pacific Northwest
  12   12   3,111   3,111   7.5%  7.2%
Seattle, WA
  12   12   3,111   3,111   7.5%  7.2%
 
                        
Northern California
  32   33   9,203   9,366   22.2%  21.5%
Oakland-East Bay, CA
  7   7   2,089   2,089   5.0%  4.8%
San Francisco, CA
  9   11   2,015   2,489   4.9%  5.7%
San Jose, CA
  16   15   5,099   4,788   12.3%  11.0%
 
                        
Southern California
  16   19   4,872   5,750   11.8%  13.2%
Los Angeles, CA
  7   9   2,448   3,006   5.9%  6.9%
Orange County, CA
  6   7   1,366   1,686   3.3%  3.9%
San Diego, CA
  3   3   1,058   1,058   2.6%  2.4%
 
                        
 
                        
 
  142   151   41,412   43,533   100.0%  100.0%
 
                        
We manage and operate substantially all of our Current Communities. During the year ended December 31, 2006, including communities owned by joint ventures and the Fund, we completed construction of 1,368 apartment homes in six communities, acquired 1,397 apartment homes in six communities and sold 1,036 apartment homes in four communities. The average age of our Current Communities, on a weighted average basis according to number of apartment homes, is 14.1 years. When adjusted to reflect redevelopment activity, as if redevelopment were a new construction completion date, the average age of our Current Communities is 9.3 years.
Of the Current Communities, as of January 31, 2007, we own:
  a full fee simple, or absolute, ownership interest in 113 operating communities, six of which are on land subject to land leases expiring in November 2028, July 2029, December 2034, January 2062, April 2095, and March 2142;
 
  a general partnership interest in two partnerships that each own a fee simple interest in an operating community;
 
  a general partnership interest and an indirect limited partnership interest in the Fund, which owns a fee simple interest in 14 operating communities;
 
  a general partnership interest in five partnerships structured as “DownREITs,” as described more fully below, that own an aggregate of 16 communities;
 
  a membership interest in five limited liability companies that each hold a fee simple interest in an operating community, three of which are on land subject to land leases expiring in December 2026, November 2089, and December 2103; and

18


 

  a residual profits interest (with no ownership interest) in a limited liability company to which an operating community was transferred upon completion of construction in the second quarter of 2006.
We also hold, directly or through wholly-owned subsidiaries, the full fee simple ownership interest in 17 of the Development Communities.
In each of our five partnerships structured as DownREITs, either AvalonBay or one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries is the general partner, and there are one or more limited partners whose interest in the partnership is represented by units of limited partnership interest. For each DownREIT partnership, limited partners are entitled to receive an initial distribution before any distribution is made to the general partner. Although the partnership agreements for each of the DownREITs are different, generally the distributions per unit paid to the holders of units of limited partnership interests have approximated our current common stock dividend amount. The holders of units of limited partnership interest have the right to present all or some of their units for redemption for a cash amount as determined by the applicable partnership agreement and based on the fair value of our common stock. In lieu of a cash redemption by the partnership, we may elect to acquire any unit presented for redemption for one share of our common stock or for such cash amount. As of January 31, 2007, there were 144,955 DownREIT partnership units outstanding. The DownREIT partnerships are consolidated for financial reporting purposes.

19


 

Profile of Current, Development and Unconsolidated Communities (1)
(Dollars in thousands, except per apartment home data)
                                             
                          Average economic  Average    
        Approx.      Year of Average  Physical  occupancy  rental rate  Financial 
    Number of  rentable area      completion/ Size  occupancy at         $ per  $ per  reporting cost 
  City and state homes  (Sq. Ft.)  Acres  acquisition (Sq. Ft.)  12/31/06  2006  2005  Apt (4)  Sq. Ft.  (5) 
 
                                            
CURRENT COMMUNITIES
                                            
 
                                            
NORTHEAST
                                            
Boston, MA
                                            
Avalon at Bedford Center
 Bedford, MA  139   159,704   38.0  2006  1,149   95.7%  85.4%(3)  17.1% $1,705  $1.27(3)  24,716 
Avalon at Center Place (11)
 Providence, RI  225   222,834   1.2  1991/1997  990   88.0%  93.8%  95.6%  2,247   2.13   28,744 
Avalon at Crane Brook
 Danvers & Peabody, MA  387   410,454   20.0  2004  1,271   95.3%  95.5%  85.6%  1,349   1.21   54,781 
Avalon at Faxon Park
 Quincy, MA  171   175,649   8.3  1998  1,027   95.3%  96.3%  95.7%  1,596   1.50   15,657 
Avalon at Flanders Hill
 Westborough, MA  280   299,828   62.0  2003  1,099   95.7%  95.4%  97.0%  1,515   1.35   37,202 
Avalon at Lexington
 Lexington, MA  198   230,277   16.1  1994  1,163   98.0%  95.9%  97.1%  1,775   1.46   16,034 
Avalon at Newton Highlands (8)
 Newton, MA  294   339,484   7.0  2003  1,177   95.2%  95.2%  96.0%  2,220   1.83   56,664 
Avalon at Prudential Center
 Boston, MA  780   732,237   1.0  1968/1998  939   97.4%  97.5%  96.8%  2,767   2.87   156,653 
Avalon at Steven’s Pond
 Saugus, MA  326   381,825   82.6  2004  1,106   96.0%  95.7%  94.6%  1,587   1.30   54,285 
Avalon at The Pinehills I
 Plymouth, MA  101   151,712   6.0  2004  1,954   96.0%  93.4%  83.9%  1,814   1.13   19,943 
Avalon Essex
 Peabody, MA  154   198,478   11.1  2000  1,289   98.1%  97.3%  96.6%  1,605   1.21   21,817 
Avalon Ledges
 Weymouth, MA  304   329,822   57.6  2002  1,023   95.4%  95.3%  94.3%  1,432   1.26   36,367 
Avalon Oaks
 Wilmington, MA  204   229,752   22.5  1999  1,023   98.5%  95.1%  93.5%  1,515   1.28   21,257 
Avalon Oaks West
 Wilmington, MA  120   133,376   27.0  2002  1,033   97.5%  93.7%  93.8%  1,432   1.21   16,844 
Avalon Orchards
 Marlborough, MA  156   176,497   23.0  2002  1,219   95.5%  96.4%  97.2%  1,495   1.27   21,150 
Avalon Summit
 Quincy, MA  245   224,418   8.0  1986/1996  916   97.6%  95.5%  95.2%  1,221   1.27   17,345 
Avalon West
 Westborough, MA  120   147,472   8.0  1996  1,229   95.8%  95.9%  96.7%  1,432   1.12   11,332 
Essex Place
 Peabody, MA  286   250,322   18.0  2004  875   96.2%  97.8%  96.3%  1,090   1.22   23,727 
 
                                            
Fairfield-New Haven, CT
                                            
Avalon at Greyrock Place
 Stamford, CT  306   314,600   3.0  2002  1,040   97.4%  97.9%  97.6%  2,088   1.99   70,393 
Avalon Danbury
 Danbury, CT  234   235,320   36.0  2005  1,006   94.0%  94.5%  40.8%(3)  1,619   1.52   35,454 
Avalon Darien
 Darien, CT  189   242,533   32.0  2004  1,282   95.8%  93.7%  97.7%  2,500   1.82   41,519 
Avalon Gates
 Trumbull, CT  340   379,282   37.0  1997  1,116   95.0%  98.1%  96.3%  1,554   1.37   37,105 
Avalon Glen
 Stamford, CT  238   229,644   4.1  1991  965   93.7%  97.2%  98.0%  1,878   1.89   32,143 
Avalon Haven
 North Haven, CT  128   139,972   10.6  2000  1,094   96.1%  97.4%  95.9%  1,511   1.35   13,987 
Avalon Milford I
 Milford, CT  246   216,746   22.0  2004  886   95.9%  98.1%  93.9%  1,363   1.52   31,441 
Avalon New Canaan (7)
 New Canaan, CT  104   131,782   9.1  2002  1,251   92.3%  95.7%  96.4%  2,910   2.20   24,364 
Avalon on Stamford Harbor
 Stamford, CT  323   323,587   12.1  2003  1,002   98.8%  97.6%  96.5%  2,334   2.27   62,886 
Avalon Orange
 Orange, CT  168   163,238   9.6  2005  972   95.2%  97.9%  64.1%(3)  1,436   1.45   22,096 
Avalon Springs
 Wilton, CT  102   158,259   12.0  1996  1,552   95.1%  92.7%  93.9%  2,845   1.70   17,194 
Avalon Valley
 Danbury, CT  268   300,044   17.1  1999  1,070   97.4%  98.1%  94.9%  1,621   1.42   26,310 
Avalon Walk I & II
 Hamden, CT  764   766,604   38.4  1992/1994  996   89.9%  91.7%(2)  93.2%  1,242   1.14(2)  65,461 
 
                                            
Long Island, NY
                                            
Avalon at Glen Cove South
 Glen Cove, NY  256   261,425   4.0  2004  1,050   96.9%  95.5%  95.8%  2,289   2.14   67,902 
Avalon Commons
 Smithtown, NY  312   377,240   20.6  1997  1,209   96.8%  97.1%  97.4%  2,014   1.62   33,715 
Avalon Court
 Melville, NY  494   596,942   35.4  1997/2000  1,208   96.4%  96.3%  96.8%  2,394   1.91   59,822 
Avalon Pines I
 Coram, NY  298   362,124   32.0  2005  1,485   95.3%  95.9%  71.6%(3)  1,816   1.43   46,537 
Avalon Pines II
 Coram, NY  152   185,954   42.0  2006  1,223   98.7%  71.0%(3)  N/A   2,310   1.34(3)  23,866 
Avalon Towers
 Long Beach, NY  109   124,611   1.3  1990/1995  1,143   98.2%  97.7%  97.7%  3,339   2.85   21,278 

20


 

Profile of Current, Development and Unconsolidated Communities (1)
(Dollars in thousands, except per apartment home data)
                                             
                          Average economic  Average    
        Approx.      Year of Average  Physical  occupancy  rental rate  Financial 
    Number of  rentable area      completion/ Size  occupancy at         $ per  $ per  reporting cost 
  City and state homes  (Sq. Ft.)  Acres  acquisition (Sq. Ft.)  12/31/06  2006  2005  Apt (4)  Sq. Ft.  (5) 
Northern New Jersey
                                            
Avalon at Edgewater
 Edgewater, NJ  408   428,611   7.6  2002  1,051   96.3%  95.8%  96.3%  2,269   2.07   75,214 
Avalon at Florham Park
 Florham Park, NJ  270   330,410   41.9  2001  1,224   95.6%  97.6%  96.4%  2,467   1.97   41,816 
Avalon Cove
 Jersey City, NJ  504   575,334   11.0  1997  1,142   98.8%  97.7%  97.5%  2,677   2.29   92,872 
 
                                            
Central New Jersey
                                            
Avalon at Freehold
 Freehold, NJ  296   317,331   40.3  2002  1,072   98.0%  96.3%  95.6%  1,679   1.51   34,748 
Avalon Run (13)
 Lawrenceville, NJ  426   443,168   9.0  1994  1,010   95.8%  94.6%  95.5%  1,401   1.27   60,045 
Avalon Run East
 Lawrenceville, NJ  206   257,938   27.1  1996  1,287   97.1%  95.8%  96.0%  1,594   1.22   16,358 
Avalon Run East II (8)
 Lawrenceville, NJ  312   341,320   70.5  2003  1,095   96.5%  96.2%  87.6%  1,722   1.51   52,144 
Avalon Watch
 West Windsor, NJ  512   486,069   64.4  1988  949   96.1%  96.4%  95.3%  1,368   1.39   30,138 
 
                                            
New York, NY
                                            
Avalon Bowery Place I
 New York, NY  206   162,000   1.1  2006  786   59.7%  32.2%(3)  N/A   3,418   1.40(3)  89,577 
Avalon Gardens
 Nanuet, NY  504   608,842   62.5  1998  1,208   95.2%  97.0%  97.8%  2,035   1.63   55,112 
Avalon Green
 Elmsford, NY  105   113,538   16.9  1995  1,081   94.3%  96.5%  96.3%  2,148   1.92   13,243 
Avalon on the Sound (11)
 New Rochelle, NY  412   372,860   2.4  2001  905   96.4%  96.2%  96.2%  2,237   2.38   117,098 
Avalon Riverview I (11)
 Long Island City, NY  372   332,947   1.0  2002  895   97.0%  96.7%  96.7%  2,956   3.19   94,561 
Avalon View
 Wappingers Falls, NY  288   327,547   41.0  1993  1,137   92.0%  95.0%  92.7%  1,320   1.10   19,267 
Avalon Willow
 Mamaroneck, NY  227   199,842   4.0  2000  880   98.2%  98.9%  96.4%  2,044   2.29   47,514 
The Avalon
 Bronxville, NY  110   119,410   1.5  1999  1,085   96.4%  97.0%  96.4%  3,438   3.07   31,356 
 
                                            
MID-ATLANTIC
                                            
Baltimore, MD
                                            
Avalon at Fairway Hills I & II
 Columbia, MD  384   386,344   23.8  1987/1996  1,005   95.1%  97.0%  94.7%  1,207   1.16   22,771 
Avalon at Fairway Hills III
 Columbia, MD  336   337,683   20.2  1987/1996  1,005   94.9%  95.1%(2)  91.1%(2)  1,293   1.22(2)  29,353 
Avalon at Symphony Glen
 Columbia, MD  176   179,880   10.0  1986  1,022   91.0%  96.6%  95.9%  1,200   1.13   9,355 
Avalon Landing
 Annapolis, MD  158   117,033   13.8  1984/1995  741   97.5%  97.8%  97.2%  1,177   1.55   10,188 
Southgate Crossing
 Columbia, MD  215   212,420   12.7  1986/2006  988   95.3%  93.8%  N/A   248   0.24   36,358 
 
                                            
Washington, DC
                                            
AutumnWoods
 Fairfax, VA  420   355,228   24.3  1989/1996  846   86.4%  94.6%(2)  95.2%  1,225   1.37(2)  33,201 
Avalon at Arlington Square
 Arlington, VA  842   901,120   20.1  2001  1,070   97.1%  96.5%  94.7%  1,770   1.60   112,609 
Avalon at Ballston — Washington Towers
 Arlington, VA  344   294,954   4.1  1990  857   95.9%  97.8%  97.2%  1,602   1.83   38,110 
Avalon at Cameron Court
 Alexandria, VA  460   467,292   16.0  1998  1,016   95.2%  97.3%  95.3%  1,725   1.65   43,533 
Avalon at Decoverly
 Rockville, MD  368   368,374   24.0  1991/1995  1,001   94.8%  97.0%  95.3%  1,369   1.33   32,298 
Avalon at Foxhall
 Washington, DC  308   297,875   2.7  1982  967   98.7%  96.6%  94.3%  2,050   2.05   44,388 
Avalon at Gallery Place I
 Washington, DC  203   184,230   0.5  2003  903   97.5%  95.7%  95.6%  2,235   2.36   48,873 
Avalon at Grosvenor Station (8)
 North Bethesda, MD  497   477,459   10.0  2004  963   96.8%  97.3%  95.7%  1,627   1.65   82,157 
Avalon at Providence Park
 Fairfax, VA  141   148,282   9.3  1988/1997  1,052   100.0%  96.9%  96.8%  1,387   1.28   11,680 
Avalon at Rock Spring (9) (11)
 North Bethesda, MD  386   388,232   10.2  2003  1,006   97.2%  96.6%  94.9%  1,659   1.59   46,260 
Avalon at Traville (8)
 North Potomac, MD  520   573,717   47.9  2004  1,103   96.5%  97.7%  94.7%  1,595   1.41   69,747 
Avalon Crescent
 McLean, VA  558   613,426   19.1  1996  1,099   96.1%  96.0%  96.2%  1,770   1.55   57,601 
Avalon Fields I & II
 Gaithersburg, MD  288   292,282   9.2  1998  1,050   92.7%  97.0%  95.7%  1,350   1.29   22,778 
Avalon Knoll
 Germantown, MD  300   290,544   26.7  1985  968   95.7%  97.2%  95.8%  1,147   1.15   9,395 

21


 

Profile of Current, Development and Unconsolidated Communities (1)
(Dollars in thousands, except per apartment home data)
                                             
                          Average economic  Average    
        Approx.      Year of Average  Physical  occupancy  rental rate  Financial 
    Number of  rentable area      completion/ Size  occupancy at         $ per  $ per  reporting cost 
  City and state homes  (Sq. Ft.)  Acres  acquisition (Sq. Ft.)  12/31/06  2006  2005  Apt (4)  Sq. Ft.  (5) 
MIDWEST
                                            
Chicago, IL
                                            
Avalon Arlington Heights
 Arlington Heights, IL  409   346,416   2.8  1987/2000  848   91.9%  92.9%(2)  95.0%  1,374   1.51(2)  55,857 
Avalon at Danada Farms (8)
 Wheaton, IL  295   350,606   19.2  1997  1,188   95.9%  95.3%  95.6%  1,346   1.08   38,972 
Avalon at Stratford Green (8)
 Bloomingdale, IL  192   237,084   12.7  1997  1,235   95.3%  95.9%  95.1%  1,322   1.03   22,164 
Avalon at West Grove (8)
 Westmont, IL  400   388,500   17.4  1967  971   94.5%  95.0%  96.2%  881   0.86   31,272 
 
                                            
PACIFIC NORTHWEST
                                            
Seattle, WA
                                            
Avalon at Bear Creek (8)
 Redmond, WA  264   288,250   22.2  1998  1,092   95.8%  96.3%  94.6%  1,174   1.04   34,857 
Avalon Bellevue
 Bellevue, WA  202   167,069   1.7  2001  827   98.0%  96.5%  95.8%  1,361   1.59   30,862 
Avalon Belltown
 Seattle, WA  100   82,418   0.7  2001  824   96.0%  96.4%  95.5%  1,610   1.88   18,444 
Avalon Brandemoor (8)
 Lynwood, WA  424   453,602   27.0  2001  1,070   96.0%  96.8%  96.6%  1,034   0.94   45,646 
Avalon HighGrove (8)
 Everett, WA  391   422,482   19.0  2000  1,081   96.4%  96.5%  94.9%  962   0.86   39,879 
Avalon ParcSquare (8)
 Redmond, WA  124   126,951   2.0  2000  1,024   94.4%  96.4%  95.4%  1,371   1.29   19,245 
Avalon Redmond Place (8)
 Redmond, WA  222   211,450   8.4  1991/1997  952   94.6%  96.7%  96.4%  1,116   1.13   26,409 
Avalon RockMeadow (8)
 Bothell, WA  206   243,958   11.2  2000  1,184   97.1%  96.1%  95.0%  1,132   0.92   24,806 
Avalon WildReed (8)
 Everett, WA  234   259,080   23.0  2000  1,107   96.2%  96.7%  95.7%  955   0.83   23,095 
Avalon Wynhaven (8)
 Issaquah, WA  333   424,803   11.6  2001  1,276   93.7%  95.4%  94.0%  1,286   0.96   52,844 
 
                                            
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
                                            
Oakland-East Bay, CA
                                            
Avalon at Union Square
 Union City, CA  208   150,320   8.5  1973/1996  723   98.1%  96.7%  96.9%  1,106   1.48   22,581 
Avalon at Willow Creek
 Fremont, CA  235   191,935   13.5  1985/1994  817   100.0%  97.7%  96.9%  1,336   1.60   36,212 
Avalon Dublin
 Dublin, CA  204   179,004   13.0  1989/1997  877   96.6%  97.2%  96.2%  1,400   1.55   27,866 
Avalon Fremont I
 Fremont, CA  308   316,052   14.3  1994  1,026   95.8%  96.9%  96.3%  1,583   1.49   56,612 
Avalon Pleasanton
 Pleasanton, CA  456   366,062   14.7  1988/1994  803   97.4%  96.8%  95.9%  1,304   1.57   62,350 
Waterford
 Hayward, CA  544   452,043   11.1  1985/1986  831   95.6%  95.6%  94.9%  1,154   1.33   61,686 
 
                                            
San Francisco, CA
                                            
Avalon at Cedar Ridge
 Daly City, CA  195   141,411   7.0  1972/1997  725   97.4%  96.8%  96.0%  1,404   1.87   26,546 
Avalon at Diamond Heights
 San Francisco, CA  154   123,047   3.0  1972/1994  799   98.1%  97.4%  95.9%  1,649   2.01   25,327 
Avalon at Mission Bay North
 San Francisco, CA  250   243,089   1.4  2003  977   92.8%  95.2%  95.5%  3,057   2.99   92,812 
Avalon at Nob Hill
 San Francisco, CA  185   108,745   1.4  1990/1995  588   97.3%  96.4%  96.3%  1,672   2.74   28,071 
Avalon Foster City
 Foster City, CA  288   222,364   11.0  1973/1994  772   97.9%  97.1%  97.0%  1,377   1.73   43,588 
Avalon Pacifica
 Pacifica, CA  220   186,800   21.9  1971/1995  849   96.8%  96.7%  96.1%  1,495   1.70   32,165 
Avalon Sunset Towers
 San Francisco, CA  243   171,800   16.0  1961/1996  707   95.9%  96.7%  97.4%  1,714   2.34   28,778 
Avalon Towers by the Bay
 San Francisco, CA  227   243,090   1.0  1999  1,071   97.8%  96.8%  96.2%  2,843   2.57   67,006 
Crowne Ridge
 San Rafael, CA  254   221,635   21.9  1973/1996  873   98.4%  96.3%  95.8%  1,324   1.46   33,063 

22


 

Profile of Current, Development and Unconsolidated Communities (1)
(Dollars in thousands, except per apartment home data)
                                             
                          Average economic  Average    
        Approx.      Year of Average  Physical  occupancy  rental rate  Financial 
    Number of  rentable area      completion/ Size  occupancy at         $ per  $ per  reporting cost 
  City and state homes  (Sq. Ft.)  Acres  acquisition (Sq. Ft.)  12/31/06  2006  2005  Apt (4)  Sq. Ft.  (5) 
San Jose, CA
                                            
Avalon at Blossom Hill
 San Jose, CA  324   323,496   7.5  1995  998   97.8%  96.7%  96.2%  1,484   1.44   62,060 
Avalon at Cahill Park
 San Jose, CA  218   218,177   3.8  2002  1,001   95.9%  97.0%  97.1%  1,868   1.81   52,570 
Avalon at Creekside
 Mountain View, CA  294   215,680   13.0  1962/1997  734   98.0%  97.7%  96.5%  1,257   1.67   43,423 
Avalon at Foxchase I & II
 San Jose, CA  396   334,956   12.0  1988/1987  844   97.5%  96.9%  96.0%  1,247   1.43   60,670 
Avalon at Parkside
 Sunnyvale, CA  192   203,990   8.0  1991/1996  1,062   99.5%  98.0%  97.4%  1,655   1.53   38,218 
Avalon at Pruneyard
 Campbell, CA  252   197,000   8.5  1968/1997  782   99.6%  97.4%  97.0%  1,251   1.56   32,141 
Avalon at River Oaks
 San Jose, CA  226   210,050   4.0  1990/1996  929   97.3%  97.6%  96.7%  1,487   1.56   45,009 
Avalon Campbell
 Campbell, CA  348   326,796   10.8  1995  939   98.3%  96.9%  96.2%  1,528   1.58   60,114 
Avalon Mountain View (7)
 Mountain View, CA  248   211,552   10.5  1986  853   96.4%  95.9%  95.1%  1,567   1.76   51,609 
Avalon on the Alameda
 San Jose, CA  305   299,762   8.9  1999  983   97.0%  96.9%  95.2%  1,850   1.82   56,506 
Avalon Rosewalk
 San Jose, CA  456   448,488   16.6  1997/1999  984   98.0%  96.4%  95.7%  1,480   1.45   79,364 
Avalon Silicon Valley
 Sunnyvale, CA  710   653,929   13.6  1997  921   95.2%  96.5%  95.8%  1,732   1.81   122,123 
Avalon Towers on the Peninsula
 Mountain View, CA  211   218,392   1.9  2002  1,035   97.6%  96.5%  96.7%  2,422   2.26   65,752 
CountryBrook (8)
 San Jose, CA  360   322,992   14.0  1985/1996  897   99.4%  97.8%  96.8%  1,347   1.47   48,790 
San Marino
 San Jose, CA  248   209,000   11.5  1984/1988  843   99.2%  97.4%  96.7%  1,249   1.44   35,017 
 
                                            
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
                                            
Los Angeles, CA
                                            
Avalon at Media Center
 Burbank, CA  748   530,084   14.1  1961/1997  709   96.7%  95.7%  95.9%  1,370   1.85   76,461 
Avalon at Warner Center
 Woodland Hills, CA  227   191,114   7.0  1979/1998  842   96.0%  96.8%  97.5%  1,614   1.86   26,943 
Avalon Camarillo
 Camarillo, CA  249   233,267   10.0  2006  937   99.2%  54.4%(3)  N/A   3,196   1.85(3)  47,174 
Avalon Glendale (11)
 Burbank, CA  223   241,714   5.1  2003  1,084   96.0%  95.4%  95.7%  2,237   1.97   40,248 
Avalon Woodland Hills
 Woodland Hills, CA  663   594,396   18.2  1989/1997  897   97.0%  95.5%  96.0%  1,491   1.59   72,073 
The Promenade
 Burbank, CA  400   360,587   6.9  1988/2002  901   98.0%  97.4%  96.9%  1,759   1.90   71,003 
Avalon Del Rey (9)(12)
 Los Angeles, CA  309   284,636   5.0  2006  921   97.4%  51.5%(3)  N/A   3,710   2.07(3)  65,075 
 
                                            
Orange County, CA
                                            
Avalon at Pacific Bay
 Huntington Beach, CA  304   268,000   9.7  1971/1997  882   96.7%  96.0%  96.7%  1,455   1.58   32,296 
Avalon at South Coast
 Costa Mesa, CA  258   207,672   8.0  1973/1996  805   98.1%  98.3%  97.2%  1,356   1.66   25,490 
Avalon Mission Viejo
 Mission Viejo, CA  166   124,600   7.8  1984/1996  751   95.8%  95.5%  95.4%  1,233   1.57   14,012 
Avalon Newport
 Costa Mesa, CA  145   122,415   6.6  1956/1996  844   100.0%  98.2%  97.5%  1,566   1.82   10,352 
Avalon Santa Margarita
 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA  301   229,593   20.0  1990/1997  763   97.7%  96.9%  96.5%  1,295   1.64   24,361 
 
                                            
San Diego, CA
                                            
Avalon at Cortez Hill
 San Diego, CA  294   226,140   1.4  1973/1998  769   95.6%  95.1%  95.0%  1,404   1.74   34,556 
Avalon at Mission Bay
 San Diego, CA  564   402,285   12.9  1969/1997  713   97.3%  95.7%  95.1%  1,378   1.85   66,281 
Avalon at Mission Ridge
 San Diego, CA  200   207,625   4.0  1960/1997  1,038   97.0%  96.3%  96.1%  1,509   1.40   22,421 

23


 

Profile of Current, Development and Unconsolidated Communities (1)
(Dollars in thousands, except per apartment home data)
                                             
                          Average economic  Average    
        Approx.      Year of Average  Physical  occupancy  rental rate  Financial 
    Number of  rentable area      completion/ Size  occupancy at         $ per  $ per  reporting cost 
  City and state homes  (Sq. Ft.)  Acres  acquisition (Sq. Ft.)  12/31/06  2006  2005  Apt (4)  Sq. Ft.  (5) 
DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITIES
                                            
 
                                            
Avalon at Decoverly II
 Rockville, MD  196   182,560   10.8  N/A  931   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   29,423 
Avalon at Dublin Station I
 Dublin, CA  305   299,329   4.7  N/A  981   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   42,351 
Avalon at Glen Cove North (11)
 Glen Cove, NY  111   101,161   1.3  N/A  911   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   27,137 
Avalon at Lexington Hills
 Lexington, MA  387   487,139   2.3  N/A  1,259   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   22,611 
Avalon Acton
 Acton, MA  380   353,790   5.0  N/A  931   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   16,672 
Avalon Bowery Place II
 New York, NY  90   73,624   1.1  N/A  838   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   15,007 
Avalon Chestnut Hill
 Chestnut Hill, MA  204   275,563   4.7  N/A  1,351   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   59,926 
Avalon Danvers
 Danvers, MA  433   493,095   75.0  N/A  1,139   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   46,433 
Avalon Encino
 Los Angeles, CA  131   131,252   2.0  N/A  1,002   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   22,871 
Avalon Lyndhurst
 Lyndhurst, NJ  328   331,122   5.8  N/A  1,010   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   64,226 
Avalon Meydenbauer
 Bellevue, WA  368   329,613   3.6  N/A  896   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   36,089 
Avalon on the Sound II (11)
 New Rochelle, NY  588   561,981   1.7  N/A  956   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   102,073 
Avalon Riverview North
 Long Island City, NY  602   477,657   1.8  N/A  793   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   85,814 
Avalon Shrewsbury
 Shrewbury, MA  251   209,548   25.5  N/A  835   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   33,543 
Avalon Wilshire
 Los Angeles, CA  123   125,109   1.6  N/A  1,017   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   38,338 
Avalon Woburn
 Woburn, MA  446   483,995   56.0  N/A  1,085   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   61,277 
Avalon Canoga Park
 Conoga Park, CA  210   186,599   3.3  N/A  889   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   14,031 
 
                                            
UNCONSOLIDATED COMMUNITIES
                                            
 
                                            
Aurora at Yerba Buena (6)
 San Francisco, CA  160   125,636   0.9  2000/2006  785   94.4%  95.4%(3)  N/A   2,523   3.07(3)  N/A 
Avalon at Aberdeen Station (6)
 Aberdeen, NJ  290   296,033   16.8  2002/2006  1,021   97.0%  95.0%(3)  N/A   1,736   1.61(3)  N/A 
Avalon at Mission Bay North II (9)(11)
 San Francisco, CA  313   291,817   1.5  2006  932   36.4%  27.8%(3)  N/A   9,048   2.69(3)  N/A 
Avalon at Poplar Creek (6)
 Schaumburg, IL  196   178,490   12.8  1986/2005  911   90.8%  95.9%(2)  94.3%(3)  1,073   1.13(2)  N/A 
Avalon Chrystie Place I (9)(11)
 New York, NY  361   266,940   1.5  2005  739   98.6%  98.4%  62.5%(3)  3,125   4.16   N/A 
Avalon Columbia (6)
 Columbia, MD  170   177,284   11.3  1989/2004  1,043   96.5%  96.1%(2)  84.4%(3)  1,273   1.17(2)  N/A 
Avalon Grove (9)
 Stamford, CT  402   365,252   5.1  1996  906   96.8%  96.9%  96.6%  2,101   2.24   N/A 
Avalon Lakeside (6)
 Wheaton, IL  204   162,821   12.4  2004  798   96.6%  95.5%  79.6%  894   1.07   N/A 
Avalon at Redondo Beach (6)
 Redondo Beach, CA  105   85,380   1.2  1971/2004  813   97.1%  94.4%  95.9%  1,929   2.24   N/A 
Cedar Valley (6)
 Columbia, MD  156   150,276   11.4  1972/2006  963   97.0%  96.6%(3)  N/A   1,187   1.19   N/A 
Civic Center (6)
 Norwalk, CA  192   173,568   8.7  1987/2005  904   89.1%  94.8%(2)  98.6%(3)  1,468   1.54(2)  N/A 
Fuller Martel (6)
 Los Angeles, CA  82   71,846   0.8  1987/2005  876   96.3%  96.1%  97.4%(3)  1,650   1.81   N/A 
Paseo Park (6)
 Fremont, CA  134   105,900   7.0  1987/2005  790   100.0%  96.9%  96.0%(3)  1,114   1.37(3)  N/A 
Avalon Redmond (6)
 Redmond, WA  400   340,448   24.0  1983/2004  851   87.5%  88.4%(2)  93.9%  1,016   1.06(2)  N/A 
The Covington (6)
 Schaumburg, IL  256   201,924   13.2  1988/2006  789   85.9%  83.8%(3)  N/A   1,008   1.07(3)  N/A 
Avalon Juanita Village (10)
 Kirkland, WA  211   207,511   2.9  2005  983   94.3%  94.1%  45.4%(3)  1,289   1.23   N/A 
The Springs (6)
 Corona, CA  320   241,440   13.3  1987/2006  755   94.1%  94.7%(3)  N/A   1,066   1.34(3)  N/A 

24


 

Profile of Current, Development and Unconsolidated Communities (1)
(Dollars in thousands, except per apartment home data)
(1) We own a fee simple interest in the communities listed, excepted as noted below.
 
(2) Represents community which was under redevelopment during the year, resulting in lower average economic occupancy and average rental rate per square foot for the year.
 
(3) Represents community that completed development or was purchased during the year, which could result in lower average economic occupancy and average rental rate per square foot for the year.
 
(4) Represents the average rental revenue per occupied apartment home.
 
(5) Costs are presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. For current Development Communities, cost represents total costs incurred through December 31, 2006. Financial reporting costs are excluded for unconsolidated communities, see Note 6, “Investments in Unconsolidated Entities” of our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report.
 
(6) We own a 15.2% combined general partnership and indirect limited partner equity interest in this community.
 
(7) We own a general partnership interest in a partnership that owns a fee simple interest in this community.
 
(8) We own a general partnership interest in a partnership structured as a DownREIT that owns this community.
 
(9) We own a membership interest in a limited liability company that holds a fee simple interest in this community.
 
(10) This community was transferred to a joint venture entity upon completion of development. We do not hold an equity interest in the entity, but retain a promoted residual interest in the profits of the entity. We receive a property management fee for this community.
 
(11) Community is located on land subject to a land lease.
 
(12) Upon completion of this community we admitted a 70% joint venture partner to the LLC. However, due to an operating guarantee provided to the joint venture partner, this community is consolidated for financial reporting purposes.
 
(13) In December 2006, we completed the purchase of our partner’s interest in Avalon Run, and this community is now a wholly-owned community. See Note 6, “Investments in Unconsolidated Entities” of our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report.

25


 

Features and Recreational Amenities — Current and Development Communities
                                                           
                                      Washer &       Large Balcony,     Non-   Homes w/
  1 BR  2BR  3BR                  dryer       storage or patio, deck     direct Direct pre-wired
           Studios /          Parking  hook-ups Vaulted     walk-in or Built-in   access access security
  1/1.5 BA  1/1.5 BA  2/2.5/3 BA  2/2.5 BA  3BA  efficiencies  Other  Total  spaces  or units ceilings Lofts Fireplaces closet sunroom bookcases Carports garages garages systems
CURRENT COMMUNITIES (1)
                                                          
 
                                                          
NORTHEAST
                                                          
Boston, MA
                                                          
Avalon at Bedford Center
  52      87               139   269  All Some Some Some Some All None No No Yes None
Avalon at Center Place
  103      112   4      6      225   371  All None None None Some Some None No No No None
Avalon at Crane Brook
  162   12   175   38            387   658  All Some Some Some All All None No Yes No All
Avalon at Faxon Park
  68      75   28            171   327  All Some Some Some Most All None No Yes No All
Avalon at Flanders Hill
  108   22   120   30            280   589  All Some Some Some All All None No Yes Yes All
Avalon at Lexington
  28   25   89   56             198   362  All Some Some Some Most All None Yes Yes No None
Avalon at Newton Highlands
  90   40   99   55   4   6      294   551  All Some Some Some Most Most None No No No All
Avalon at Prudential Center
  361      242      29   149      781   538  None None None None Most Some None No No No None
Avalon at Steven’s Pond
  102      202   22            326   749  All Some Some Some All All None No Yes Yes All
Avalon at The Pinehills I
  12      73   16            101   235  All Most Some Some All All None No No Yes All
Avalon Essex
  50      104               154   336  All Some Some Half Most All None No Yes Yes All
Avalon Ledges
  124   28   124   28            304   594  All Some Some Some All All None No Yes No All
Avalon Oaks
  60   24   96   24            204   394  All Some Some Some All All None No Yes No All
Avalon Oaks West
  48   12   48   12            120   232  All Some Some Some All All None No Yes No All
Avalon Orchards
  69   87                  156   307  All Some Some Some All All None No Yes Yes All
Avalon Summit
  154   58   31   1         1   245   359  None None None None Some Most None No No Yes None
Avalon West
  40      55   25            120   285  All Some Some Some All Half None No Yes Yes All
Essex Place
  40   246                  286   450  Some None None None Some Some None No No No None
 
                                                          
Fairfield-New Haven, CT
                                                          
Avalon at Greyrock Place
  52   91   99   12         52   306   464  All None None None Most All None No No No All
Avalon Danbury
  112      98   24            234   54  All None Some Some Some All None No Yes No Some
Avalon Darien
  77      80   32            189   443  All All Some Some All All None No Yes Yes All
Avalon Gates
  122      168   50            340   688  All Some Some Half All All None Yes Yes No All
Avalon Glen
  112      125   1            238   363  Most Some Some Some Some Most Some Yes No Yes Most
Avalon Haven
  28      40   24         36   128   256  All Some Some Some All All None Yes Yes No All
Avalon Milford I
  184      62               246   426  All Some None Some Some All None Yes Yes No All
Avalon New Canaan
  16      64   24            104   194  All Some Some Some All All None No Yes Yes All
Avalon on Stamford Harbor
  159      130   20      14      323   503  All Some Some Some All Most None No No No All
Avalon Orange
  84      28   28         28   168   362  All Some Some Some All All None Yes No No All
Avalon Springs
        70   32            102   264  All Half Half Most All All None No No Yes All
Avalon Valley
  106      134   28            268   637  All Some Some Some All All None Yes Yes No All
Avalon Walk I & II
  272   116   122   98         156   764   1,411  All Some Some Some Most All None Yes No No Half
 
                                                          
Long Island, NY
                                                          
Avalon at Glen Cove South
  124      91         41      256   366  All None None Some All Some None No No Some Some
Avalon Commons
  128   40   112   32            312   485  All Some Some Some All All None No Yes No All
Avalon Court
  172   54   194   74            494   797  All Half Half Some Some All None No Yes Yes All
Avalon Pines I
  72      220      6         298   1,094  All Most Some Some Most All None No Yes Yes All
Avalon Pines II
  50      102               152   135  All Most Some Some All All None No Some Some All
Avalon Towers
        38      3   1   67   109   198  All None None None Most Most None No Yes No None

26


 

Features and Recreational Amenities — Current and Development Communities
                                                           
                                      Washer &       Large Balcony,     Non-   Homes w/
  1 BR  2BR  3BR                  dryer       storage or patio, deck     direct Direct pre-wired
           Studios /          Parking  hook-ups Vaulted     walk-in or Built-in   access access security
  1/1.5 BA  1/1.5 BA  2/2.5/3 BA  2/2.5 BA  3BA  efficiencies  Other  Total  spaces  or units ceilings Lofts Fireplaces closet sunroom bookcases Carports garages garages systems
Northern New Jersey
                                                          
Avalon at Edgewater
  158      190   60            408   872  All Some Some Some All Half None No No Yes Some
Avalon at Florham Park
  46      162   62            270   583  All All None Some Most Some None No No Yes All
Avalon Cove
  197      231   26   2      48   504   460  All Some Some Some All Some None No Yes No None
 
                                                          
Central New Jersey
                                                          
Avalon at Freehold
  40   24   192   40            296   591  All Some Some Half All All None No Yes No None
Avalon Run
  144   90   108   84            426   640  All Some Some Some Some All None Yes No No All
Avalon Run East
  64   106      36            206   401  All Some Some Some Most Most None Yes Yes Yes All
Avalon Run East II
  72   36   148   56            312   500  All Some Some Some Some All None Yes Yes Yes All
Avalon Watch
  252   48   172   40            512   781  All Some None Half All All None No Yes No None
 
                                                          
New York, NY
                                                          
Avalon Bowery Place I
  98   54            54      206   131  All None None None Some Some None No No Yes Some
Avalon Gardens
  208   48   144   104            504   1,382  All Half Half Some All All Some Yes Yes Yes All
Avalon Green
  25   24   56               105   208  All Some Some Some All All None Yes No No All
Avalon on the Sound
  142      185   21   21   43      412   648  Most Some Some None Most Some None No No Yes None
Avalon Riverview I
  186      114   15   14   43      372   426  All None Some None Most Some None No No Yes None
Avalon View
  112   47   65   64            288   598  All Some Some Some Most All None Yes No No None
Avalon Willow
  151      76               227   371  All Some Some Some Some All None No No No No
The Avalon
  55   2   43   10            110   170  All Some Some Some Most Half None No No Yes All
 
                                                          
MID-ATLANTIC
                                                          
Baltimore, MD
                                                          
Avalon at Fairway Hills I & II
  185   78   100   38            401   283  All Some None Most Some All Some No No No None
Avalon at Fairway Hills III
  97   146   54   22         23   342   522  All Some None Most Some All Some No No No None
Avalon at Symphony Glen
  88   14   54   20            176   268  All Some None Most All Most Some No No No None
Avalon Landing
  83   18   57               158   256  All None None Most Most All None Yes No No None
Southgate Crossing
      63 94   48   10            2   15 353  All None None Most None All None No No No None
 
                                                          
Washington, DC
                                                          
AutumnWoods
  220   104   96               420   720  All Some None Some All All None Yes No No None
Avalon at Arlington Square
  404   24   196   60         158   842   1,411  All Some Some Some All All Some No Yes Yes All
Avalon at Ballston — Washington Towers
  233   111                  344   470  All None None Some Most All Some No No No None
Avalon at Cameron Court
  208      168            84   460   897  All Most Some Some All Most None No Yes Yes All
Avalon at Decoverly
  156      168   44            368   627  All Some Some Some Most All None No Yes No None
Avalon at Foxhall
  160   70   32   2      28   16   308   349  All Some None Some All All Some No No Yes None
Avalon at Gallery Place I
  113   75      4      11      203   148  All Some None None Most Some None No No Yes None
Avalon at Grosvenor Station
  265   33   185   13      1      497   746  All Some Some None Most Most None No Yes Yes All
Avalon at Providence Park
  19      112   4         6   141   299  All Some None Most All All None No No No None
Avalon at Rock Spring
  178   39   133   36            386   680  All Some Some Some Most All None No Yes No All
Avalon at Traville
  190   30   232   68            520   1,062  All Some Some Some All Most Some Yes Yes Yes None
Avalon Crescent
  186   26   346               558   989  All Some Some Most Most All Some No Yes Yes All
Avalon Fields I & II
  112   32   112   32         66   288   461  All Some Some Some Most Most None No Yes No All
Avalon Knoll
  136   56   80   28            300   477  All Some None Most All All Most No No No None

27


 

Features and Recreational Amenities — Current and Development Communities
                                                           
                                      Washer &       Large Balcony,     Non-   Homes w/
  1 BR  2BR  3BR                  dryer       storage or patio, deck     direct Direct pre-wired
           Studios /          Parking  hook-ups Vaulted     walk-in or Built-in   access access security
  1/1.5 BA  1/1.5 BA  2/2.5/3 BA  2/2.5 BA  3BA  efficiencies  Other  Total  spaces  or units ceilings Lofts Fireplaces closet sunroom bookcases Carports garages garages systems
MIDWEST
                                                          
Chicago, IL
                                                          
Avalon at Arlington Heights
  232      147         30      409   650  All None None None Some Half None No No No None
Avalon at Danada Farms
  132      134   14   15         295   555  All None None Some Most Some Some No No Yes None
Avalon at Stratford Green
  63      108   21            192   424  All None None Some Most Most Some No Yes Yes None
Avalon at West Grove
  200   200                  400   594  None None None None Some Half None Yes No No None
 
                                                          
PACIFIC NORTHWEST
                                                          
Seattle, WA
                                                          
Avalon at Bear Creek
  55   40   110   56   3         264   515  All Some None Most All All Half Yes Yes Yes All
Avalon Bellevue
  112      67         23      202   300  All Some Some Some Most Some None No No No Some
Avalon Belltown
  64      20         16      100   118  All None None None Most Some None No No No Yes
Avalon Brandemoor
  88   109   149   78            424   737  All Some None Most All All Some Yes Yes Yes All
Avalon HighGrove
  84   119   124   56   8         391   721  All Half None Most All All Some Yes Yes Yes All
Avalon ParcSquare
  31   26   55   12         117   124   189  All Some None None All All None No Yes Yes Some
Avalon Redmond Place
  76   44   67   35            222   161  All Some None Most Most All None Yes Yes No None
Avalon RockMeadow
  28   48   86   28   16         206   415  All Some None Most Most All Some Yes No Yes All
Avalon WildReed
  36   60   78   60            234   463  All Some None Most All All Some Yes Yes No All
Avalon Wynhaven
  3   42   239   13   28      8   333   780  All Most Some Most Half Most None Yes Yes Yes All
 
                                                          
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
                                                          
Oakland-East Bay, CA
                                                          
Avalon at Union Square
  124   84                  208   296  None None None Most All All None Yes No No None
Avalon at Willow Creek
  99      136               235   240  All None None None All All None Yes No No None
Avalon Dublin
  72   8   60   48         16   204   428  Most Some None Most All All None No Yes No None
Avalon Fremont I
  88      176      44         308   609  All Some None Some Half All None Yes Yes No All
Avalon Pleasanton
  238      218               456   941  All Some None Most Some All None Yes Yes Yes None
Waterford
  208      336               544   927  Some Some None None All All None Yes No No None
 
                                                          
San Francisco, CA
                                                          
Avalon at Cedar Ridge
  117   33   24         21      195   259  None None Some None Some All None Yes No Yes None
Avalon at Diamond Heights
  90      49   15            154   155  None Some None None All All None No Yes No None
Avalon at Mission Bay North
  148      95   6      1      250   191  All None Some None All Most Some No Yes No Some
Avalon at Nob Hill
  114      25         46      185   105  None None None None Some Some Most No Yes No None
Avalon Foster City
  125   122   1         40      288   290  None None None None Most All Some Yes No No None
Avalon Pacifica
  58   106   56               220   301  None None None Some Some All None Yes Yes No None
Avalon Sunset Towers
  183   20   20         20      243   244  None None None None None Some None No No Yes None
Avalon Towers by the Bay
  103      120      3         226   212  All None None Some Half Most None No No No None
Crowne Ridge
  158   68   24         4      254   404  Some Some None Some None All None Yes No Yes None

28


 

Features and Recreational Amenities — Current and Development Communities
                                                           
                                      Washer &       Large Balcony,     Non-   Homes w/
  1 BR  2BR  3BR                  dryer       storage or patio, deck     direct Direct pre-wired
           Studios /          Parking  hook-ups Vaulted     walk-in or Built-in   access access security
  1/1.5 BA  1/1.5 BA  2/2.5/3 BA  2/2.5 BA  3BA  efficiencies  Other  Total  spaces  or units ceilings Lofts Fireplaces closet sunroom bookcases Carports garages garages systems
San Jose, CA
                                                          
Avalon at Blossom Hill
  90      210      24         324   549  All Some None None Most All None Yes No No None
Avalon at Cahill Park
  118      94      6         218   314  All Some Some None All Some None No No No Yes
Avalon at Creekside
  158   128            8      294   441  None None None Some None Most None Yes No No None
Avalon at Foxchase I & II
  156      240               396   666  All Some None None ALL All None Yes Yes No None
Avalon at Parkside
  60      96   36            192   353  All Some None Half All All Some Yes Yes No None
Avalon at Pruneyard
  212   40                  252   400  All None None None None Half None Yes Yes No None
Avalon at River Oaks
  100      126               226   356  Most None None Most All All None No Yes No None
Avalon Campbell
  157      179      12         348   454  All Some None None All All None Yes No No All
Avalon Mountain View
  108      88   52            248   672  All Some None None Some All None Yes No No None
Avalon on the Alameda
  113      164      28         305   534  All Some Some Some Most All None Some Yes No None
Avalon Rosewalk
  168      264      24         456   684  All Some None Some ALL All Most Yes Yes No None
Avalon Silicon Valley
  338      336   18   15   3      710   2,000  All Some Some Some All All Some Yes Yes No None
Avalon Towers on the Peninsula
  88      117      6         211   307  All Some None None Most All None No No Yes None
CountryBrook
  108      252               360   692  All None None All None All None Yes Yes No None
San Marino
  102      146               248   439  All Some None None None All None Yes No No None
 
                                                          
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
                                                          
Los Angeles, CA
                                                          
Avalon at Media Center
  296   169   50   12      221      748   893  Most Some None Some Some Some None Yes Yes No None
Avalon at Warner Center
  88   54   65   20            227   427  All Some None Some Some All None Yes Yes No None
Avalon Camarillo
  125         124            249   482  All None None None All All None No Yes Yes None
Avalon Glendale
  75      121      27         223   519  All None Some Some All All None No No No All
Avalon Woodland Hills
  222      441               663   1,356  Some Some Some None Most All None No No No None
The Promenade
  153      196   51            400   736  Some Some Some All Some All None No No No None
Avalon Del Rey
  190         119            309   623  All None Some None All All None No Yes No None
 
                                                          
Orange County, CA
                                                          
Avalon at Pacific Bay
  144   56   104               304   492  All None None None All All None Yes Yes No None
Avalon at South Coast
  124      86         48      258   428  Some Half None None Half All None Yes Yes No None
Avalon Mission Viejo
  94   28   44               166   232  None None None None None All None Yes Yes No None
Avalon Newport
  44   54      35      12      145   249  Most Some None Some Most Most Some Yes Yes No None
Avalon Santa Margarita
  160      141               301   521  All None None None None All None Yes Yes No None
San Diego, CA
                                                          
Avalon at Cortez Hill
  113      84         97      294   298  None None None None None All None No No No None
Avalon at Mission Bay
  270   9   165         120      564   755  None None None None Some All None No No No None
Avalon at Mission Ridge
  18   98   1   83            200   387  Most None None Most Most Most Most No Yes No None

29


 

Features and Recreational Amenities — Current and Development Communities
                                                           
                                      Washer &       Large Balcony,     Non-   Homes w/
  1 BR  2BR  3BR                  dryer       storage or patio, deck     direct Direct pre-wired
           Studios /          Parking  hook-ups Vaulted     walk-in or Built-in   access access security
  1/1.5 BA  1/1.5 BA  2/2.5/3 BA  2/2.5 BA  3BA  efficiencies  Other  Total  spaces  or units ceilings Lofts Fireplaces closet sunroom bookcases Carports garages garages systems
DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITIES
                                                      
Avalon at Decoverly II
  106      90               196   327  All Some Some None Some All None No Yes No None
Avalon at Glen Cove North
  87   8            16      111   190  All None None None All Some None No No No None
Avalon at Lexington Hills
  109      254   24            387   823  All Some Some Some All Some None No Yes No None
Avalon Lyndhurst
  118   45   157         8      328   569  Most Some Some None All Most None No No No None
Avalon Acton
  192      188               380   732  All Some Some Some Most Some None No Yes No None
Avalon Bowery Place II
  62    18            10      90   50  All None None None Most Some None No No No None
Avalon Canoga Park
  125      70   15            210   370  All Some Some None Most Most None No Yes No None
Avalon Chestnut Hill
  36   28   85   50      5      204   427  All None Some None All All None No No No All
Avalon Danvers
  148      235   50            433   856  All Some Some Some Some Some None No Yes Yes None
Avalon Encino
  61      56      14         131   357  All Some None None Some Some None No Yes No None
Avalon Meydenbauer
  174   5   88   23      78      368   485  All None None None Some Some None No Yes Yes None
Avalon on the Sound II
  208      162   128      90      588   489  All None None None Some None None No All None None
Avalon Riverview North
  381      146      1   74      602   361  Some None None None Some Some None No Yes No None
Avalon Shrewsbury
  92   12   123   24            251   529  All None Some None All All None No Yes Yes None
Avalon Woburn
  158      288               446   892  All None Some Some All Some None No Yes No None
Avalon Wilshire
  53      62   8            123   350  All None None None All Most None No Yes No None

30


 

Features and Recreational Amenities — Current and Development Communities
                                       
    Community Building                                
  Buildings w/ entrance entrance Under- Aerobicse                   Indoor /        
  security controlled controlled ground dance   Picnic Walking /   Sauna / Tennis   Fitness Sand outdoor Clubhouse / Business    
  systems access access parking studio Car wash area jogging trail Pool whirlpool court Racquetball center volleyball basketball clubroom center Tot lot Concierge
CURRENT COMMUNITIES (1)
                                      
 
                                      
NORTHEAST
                                      
Boston, MA
                                      
Avalon at Bedford Center
 None No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No
Avalon at Center Place
 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes
Avalon at Crane Brook
 Some Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Avalon at Faxon Park
 None No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No
Avalon at Flanders Hill
 None No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No
Avalon at Lexington
 None No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No
Avalon at Newton Highlands
 All No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Avalon at Prudential Center
 None No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes
Avalon at Steven’s Pond
 All No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No
Avalon at The Pinehills I
 None No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No No No
Avalon Essex
 None No No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No
Avalon Ledges
 None No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No
Avalon Oaks
 None No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No
Avalon Oaks West
 None No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No
Avalon Orchards
 None No No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No
Avalon Summit
 None Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No No
Avalon West
 None No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No Yes No
Essex Place
 None No No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No
 
                                      
Fairfield-New Haven, CT
                                      
Avalon at Greyrock Place
 All No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Avalon Danbury
 Some No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No
Avalon Darien
 None Yes No No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No
Avalon Gates
 None Yes No No No No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No
Avalon Glen
 None No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes
Avalon Haven
 All Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No No No Yes No
Avalon Milford I
 None No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No
Avalon New Canaan
 All No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No
Avalon on Stamford HaCBor
 All Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes
Avalon Orange
 Some No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No
Avalon Springs
 Some No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No
Avalon Valley
 None No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No
Avalon Walk I & II
 None No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No
 
                                      
Long Island, NY
                                      
Avalon at Glen Cove South
 None Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes
Avalon Commons
 All No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No
Avalon Court
 All No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No
Avalon Pines I
 None No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No
Avalon Pines II
 None No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Avalon Towers
 None No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes

31


 

Features and Recreational Amenities — Current and Development Communities
                                       
    Community Building                                
  Buildings w/ entrance entrance Under- Aerobicse                   Indoor /        
  security controlled controlled ground dance   Picnic Walking /   Sauna / Tennis   Fitness Sand outdoor Clubhouse / Business    
  systems access access parking studio Car wash area jogging trail Pool whirlpool court Racquetball center volleyball basketball clubroom center Tot lot Concierge
Northern New Jersey
                                      
Avalon at Edgewater
 All Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes
Avalon at Florham Park
 None No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No No No
Avalon Cove
 No Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes
 
                                      
Central New Jersey
                                      
Avalon at Freehold
 None No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No
Avalon Run
 None Yes No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No
Avalon Run East
 All No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No
Avalon Run East II
 Yes No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No
Avalon Watch
 None No Some No No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No
 
                                      
New York, NY
                                      
Avalon Bowery Place I
 All Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes
Avalon Gardens
 Some No No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No
Avalon Green
 None No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes No Yes No
Avalon on the Sound
 No Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Avalon Riverview I
 All Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes
Avalon View
 Some No No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No
Avalon Willow
 No Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes
The Avalon
 All Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes
 
                                      
MID-ATLANTIC
                                      
Baltimore, MD
                                      
Avalon at Fairway Hills I & II
 None No No No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No
Avalon at Fairway Hills III
 None No No No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No
Avalon at Symphony Glen
 None No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No No No
Avalon Landing
 None No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No No No
Southgate Crossing
 None Yes No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No
 
                                      
Washington, DC
                                      
AutumnWoods
 None No No No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No
Avalon at Arlington Square
 None No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Avalon at Ballston — Washington Towers
 All Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No Yes
Avalon at Cameron Court
 All Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes
Avalon at Decoverly
 None No No No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No
Avalon at Foxhall
 None Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No Yes
Avalon at Gallery Place I
 All Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes
Avalon at Grosvenor Station
 None No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes
Avalon at Providence Park
 None No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No No Yes Yes No No
Avalon at Rock Spring
 None No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Avalon at Traville
 None No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Avalon Crescent
 None Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes
Avalon Fields I & II
 None No No No No Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No
Avalon Knoll
 None No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes No

32


 

Features and Recreational Amenities — Current and Development Communities
                                       
    Community Building                                
  Buildings w/ entrance entrance Under- Aerobicse                   Indoor /        
  security controlled controlled ground dance   Picnic Walking /   Sauna / Tennis   Fitness Sand outdoor Clubhouse / Business    
  systems access access parking studio Car wash area jogging trail Pool whirlpool court Racquetball center volleyball basketball clubroom center Tot lot Concierge
MIDWEST
                                      
Chicago, IL
                                      
Avalon at Arlington Heights
 All Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No No No
Avalon at Danada Farms
 None No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No No No
Avalon at Stratford Green
 All No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No
Avalon at West Grove
 None Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No
 
                                      
PACIFIC NORTHWEST
                                      
Seattle, WA
                                      
Avalon at Bear Creek
 None Yes No No No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No
Avalon Bellevue
 Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No
Avalon Belltown
 Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No
Avalon Brandemoor
 All No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No
Avalon HighGrove
 None No No No No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No
Avalon ParcSquare
 All Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No
Avalon Redmond Place
 None No No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No
Avalon RockMeadow
 None No No No No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No
Avalon WildReed
 None No No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No
Avalon Wynhaven
 None No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes
 
                                      
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
                                      
Oakland-East Bay, CA
                                      
Avalon at Union Square
 None Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No Yes No
Avalon at Willow Creek
 None Yes No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No No
Avalon Dublin
 None No No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No
Avalon Fremont I
 None No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No No
Avalon Pleasanton
 None No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No
Waterford
 None Yes No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No Yes No
 
                                      
San Francisco, CA
                                      
Avalon at Cedar Ridge
 None No No No No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No No
Avalon at Diamond Heights
 None No Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No No
Avalon at Mission Bay North
 All Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes
Avalon at Nob Hill
 None Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No No No
Avalon Foster City
 Some No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No
Avalon Pacifica
 None No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No No
Avalon Sunset Towers
 All Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No
Avalon Towers by the Bay
 None Yes Yes Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes
Crowne Ridge
 None No No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No No

33


 

Features and Recreational Amenities — Current and Development Communities
                                       
    Community Building                                
  Buildings w/ entrance entrance Under- Aerobicse                   Indoor /        
  security controlled controlled ground dance   Picnic Walking /   Sauna / Tennis   Fitness Sand outdoor Clubhouse / Business    
  systems access access parking studio Car wash area jogging trail Pool whirlpool court Racquetball center volleyball basketball clubroom center Tot lot Concierge
San Jose, CA
                                      
Avalon at Blossom Hill
 None Yes No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No No
Avalon at Cahill Park
 All Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No
Avalon at Creekside
 Some No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No
Avalon at Foxchase I & II
 None No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No No
Avalon at Parkside
 None No No Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Avalon at Pruneyard
 Yes No No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No No No
Avalon at River Oaks
 None No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No No
Avalon Campbell
 None Yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No
Avalon Mountain View
 None No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No
Avalon on the Alameda
 None Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No No
Avalon Rosewalk
 None Yes No No No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No No
Avalon Silicon Valley
 Some Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Avalon Towers on the Peninsula
 All Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes
CountryBrook
 None Yes No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No No
San Marino
 None Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No Yes No
 
                                      
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
                                      
Los Angeles, CA
                                      
Avalon at Media Center
 None No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No Yes
Avalon at Warner Center
 None Yes No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No
Avalon Camarillo
 None Yes No No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No
Avalon Glendale
 None Yes No Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No No
Avalon Woodland Hills
 None Yes No Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No No
The Promenade
 All Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No
Avalon Del Rey
 All Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No
 
                                      
Orange County, CA
                                      
Avalon at Pacific Bay
 None Yes No No No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No
Avalon at South Coast
 None Yes No No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No
Avalon Mission Viejo
 None Yes No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No No
Avalon Newport
 None No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No No
Avalon Santa Margarita
 None No No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No
 
                                      
San Diego, CA
                                      
Avalon at Cortez Hill
 All Yes Yes No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No No
Avalon at Mission Bay
 None Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No
Avalon at Mission Ridge
 None No No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No Yes No

34


 

Features and Recreational Amenities — Current and Development Communities
                                       
    Community Building                                
  Buildings w/ entrance entrance Under- Aerobicse                   Indoor /        
  security controlled controlled ground dance   Picnic Walking /   Sauna / Tennis   Fitness Sand outdoor Clubhouse / Business    
  systems access access parking studio Car wash area jogging trail Pool whirlpool court Racquetball center volleyball basketball clubroom center Tot lot Concierge
DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITIES
                                      
Avalon at Decoverly II
 None No No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No
Avalon at Glen Cove North
 All No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes
Avalon at Lexington Hills
 Some No Some Some Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Avalon Lyndhurst
 All No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No No No
Avalon Acton
 All Yes Some Some No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No
Avalon Bowery Place II
 All Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes
Avalon Canoga Park
 All Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No No
Avalon Chestnut Hill
 None No Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes
Avalon Danvers
 Some No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Avalon Encino
 All Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No No
Avalon Meydenbauer
 All Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No
Avalon on the Sound II
 All All All No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes
Avalon Riverview North
 None No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes
Avalon Shrewsbury
 None No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No
Avalon Woburn
 Some No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No
Avalon Wilshire
 All Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No No
(1) For the purpose of this table, Current Communities excludes communities held by unconsolidated real estate joint ventures.

35


 

Development Communities
As of December 31, 2006, we had 17 Development Communities under construction. We expect these Development Communities, when completed, to add a total of 5,153 apartment homes to our portfolio for a total capitalized cost, including land acquisition costs, of approximately $1,323,300,000. You should carefully review Item 1a., “Risk Factors,” for a discussion of the risks associated with development activity.
The following table presents a summary of the Development Communities. We hold a direct or indirect fee simple ownership interest in these communities except where noted.
                          
       Total             
   Number of  capitalized             
   apartment  cost (1)  Construction  Initial  Estimated  Estimated 
   homes  ($ millions)  start  occupancy (2)  completion  stabilization (3) 
1.
Avalon Wilshire
  123  $46.6   Q1 2005   Q1 2007   Q2 2007   Q4 2007 
 
Los Angeles, CA
                        
2.
Avalon Chestnut Hill
  204   60.6   Q2 2005   Q3 2006   Q1 2007   Q3 2007 
 
Chestnut Hill, MA
                        
3.
Avalon at Decoverly II
  196   30.5   Q3 2005   Q2 2006   Q1 2007   Q3 2007 
 
Rockville, MD
                        
4.
Avalon Lyndhurst (4)
  328   78.8   Q3 2005   Q4 2006   Q4 2007   Q2 2008 
 
Lyndhurst, NJ
                        
5.
Avalon Shrewsbury
  251   36.1   Q3 2005   Q2 2006   Q2 2007   Q4 2007 
 
Shrewsbury, MA
                        
6.
Avalon Riverview North
  602   175.6   Q3 2005   Q3 2007   Q3 2008   Q1 2009 
 
New York, NY
                        
7.
Avalon at Glen Cove North
  111   42.4   Q4 2005   Q2 2007   Q3 2007   Q1 2008 
 
Glen Cove, NY
                        
8.
Avalon Danvers
  433   84.8   Q4 2005   Q1 2007   Q2 2008   Q4 2008 
 
Danvers, MA
                        
9.
Avalon Woburn
  446   81.3   Q4 2005   Q3 2006   Q1 2008   Q3 2008 
 
Woburn, MA
                        
10.
Avalon on the Sound II
  588   184.2   Q1 2006   Q3 2007   Q3 2008   Q1 2009 
 
New Rochelle, NY
                        
11.
Avalon Meydenbauer
  368   84.3   Q1 2006   Q4 2007   Q3 2008   Q1 2009 
 
Bellevue, WA
                        
12.
Avalon at Dublin Station I
  305   85.8   Q2 2006   Q3 2007   Q2 2008   Q4 2008 
 
Dublin, CA
                        
13.
Avalon at Lexington Hills
  387   86.2   Q2 2006   Q2 2007   Q3 2008   Q1 2009 
 
Lexington, MA
                        
14.
Avalon Bowery Place II (5)
  90   61.9   Q3 2006   Q4 2007   Q1 2008   Q2 2008 
 
New York, NY
                        
15.
Avalon Encino
  131   61.5   Q3 2006   Q3 2008   Q4 2008   Q1 2009 
 
Los Angeles, CA
                        
16.
Avalon Canoga Park
  210   53.9   Q4 2006   Q1 2008   Q2 2008   Q4 2008 
 
Canoga Park, CA
                        
17.
Avalon Acton (5)
  380   68.8   Q4 2006   Q1 2008   Q4 2008   Q2 2009 
 
Acton, MA
                        
 
 
                      
 
 
                        
 
Total
  5,153  $1,323.3                 
 
 
                      
(1) Total capitalized cost includes all capitalized costs projected to be or actually incurred to develop the respective Development Community, determined in accordance with GAAP, including land acquisition costs, construction costs, real estate taxes, capitalized interest and loan fees, permits, professional fees, allocated development overhead and other regulatory fees. Total capitalized cost for communities identified as having joint venture ownership, either during construction or upon construction completion, represents the total projected joint venture contribution amount.
 
(2) Future initial occupancy dates are estimates. There can be no assurance that we will pursue to completion any or all of these proposed developments.
 
(3) Stabilized operations is defined as the earlier of (i) attainment of 95% or greater physical occupancy or (ii) the one-year anniversary of completion of development.

36


 

(4) The remediation of our Avalon Lyndhurst development site, as discussed in Note 8, “Commitment and Contingencies” of the Consolidated Financial Statements included as Item 8 of this report, is substantially complete. The net cost associated with this remediation effort after considering insurance proceeds received to date, including costs associated with construction delays, is expected to total approximately $7.5 million. We are pursuing the recovery of these additional costs through insurance as well as from the third parties involved, but any additional recoverable amounts are not currently estimable. The total expected capitalized cost cited above does not reflect the potential impact of these additional net costs.
 
(5) This community is being financed in part by third party, tax-exempt debt.
Redevelopment Communities
As of December 31, 2006, we had three consolidated communities under redevelopment. We expect the total capitalized cost to redevelop these communities to be $25,800,000, excluding costs prior to redevelopment. In addition, the Fund has three communities under redevelopment. We have found that the cost to redevelop an existing apartment community is more difficult to budget and estimate than the cost to develop a new community. Accordingly, we expect that actual costs may vary from our budget by a wider range than for a new development community. We cannot assure you that we will meet our schedule for reconstruction completion or restabilized operations, or that we will meet our budgeted costs, either individually or in the aggregate. We anticipate increasing our redevelopment activity related to Fund-owned communities, as well as communities in our current operating portfolio. You should carefully review Item 1a., “Risk Factors,” for a discussion of the risks associated with redevelopment activity.
The following presents a summary of these Redevelopment Communities:
                         
      Total cost           
  Number of  ($ millions)      Estimated  Estimated 
  apartment  Pre-redevelopment  Total capitalized  Reconstruction  reconstruction  restabilized 
  homes  cost  cost (1)  start  completion  operations (2) 
Consolidated Communities
                        
1. Avalon Arlington HeightsArlington Heights, IL
  409  $50.2  $57.1   Q1 2006   Q1 2007   Q3 2007 
2. Avalon Walk I and II
Hamden, CT
  764   59.4   71.2   Q1 2006   Q4 2007   Q2 2008 
3. Avalon at AutumnWoodsFairfax, VA
  420   31.2   38.3   Q3 2006   Q3 2008   Q1 2009 
 
                     
 
                        
Subtotal
  1,593  $140.8  $166.6             
 
                     
 
                        
Fund Communities
                        
1. Avalon Redmond
Redmond, WA
  400  $49.2  $56.7   Q2 2006   Q4 2007   Q2 2008 
2. Civic Center Place
Norwalk, CA
  192   38.1   43.5   Q4 2006   Q2 2008   Q4 2008 
3. Avalon at Poplar CreekSchaumburg, IL
  196   25.2   28.6   Q4 2006   Q1 2008   Q3 2008 
 
                     
 
                        
Subtotal
  788  $112.5  $128.8             
 
                     
 
                        
Total
  2,381  $253.3  $295.4             
 
                     
(1) Total capitalized cost includes all capitalized costs projected to be or actually incurred to develop the respective Redevelopment Community, including land acquisition costs, construction costs, real estate taxes, capitalized interest and loan fees, permits, professional fees, allocated development overhead and other regulatory fees, all as determined in accordance with GAAP.
 
(2) Restabilized operations is defined as the earlier of (i) attainment of 95% or greater physical occupancy or (ii) the one-year anniversary of completion of redevelopment.

37


 

Development Rights
As of December 31, 2006, we are evaluating the future development of 54 new apartment communities on land that is either owned by us, under contract, subject to a leasehold interest or for which we hold either a purchase or lease option. We generally hold Development Rights through options to acquire land, although for 18 of the Development Rights we currently own the land on which a community would be built if we proceeded with development. The Development Rights range from those beginning design and architectural planning to those that have completed site plans and drawings and can begin construction almost immediately. We estimate that the successful completion of all of these communities would ultimately add 14,185 apartment homes to our portfolio. Substantially all of these apartment homes will offer features like those offered by the communities we currently own. At December 31, 2006, there were cumulative capitalized costs (including legal fees, design fees and related overhead costs, but excluding land costs) of $39,365,000 relating to Development Rights that we consider probable for future development. In addition, land costs related to the pursuit of Development Rights (consisting of original land and additional carrying costs) of $209,568,000 are reflected as land held for development as of December 31, 2006 on the Consolidated Balance Sheet of the Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Item 8 of this report.
The properties comprising the Development Rights are in different stages of the due diligence and regulatory approval process. The decisions as to which of the Development Rights to invest in, if any, or to continue to pursue once an investment in a Development Right is made, are business judgments that we make after we perform financial, demographic and other analyses. In the event that we do not proceed with a Development Right, we generally would not recover capitalized costs incurred in the pursuit of those communities, unless we were to recover amounts in connection with the sale of land; however, we cannot guarantee a recovery. Pre-development costs incurred in the pursuit of Development Rights for which future development is not yet considered probable are expensed as incurred. In addition, if the status of a Development Right changes, making future development no longer probable, any capitalized pre-development costs are written-off with a charge to expense.
You should carefully review Section 1a., “Risk Factors,” for a discussion of the risks associated with Development Rights.

38


 

The table below presents a summary of these Development Rights:
              
           Total 
       Estimated  capitalized 
       number  cost 
 Location     of homes  ($ millions) (1) 
1.
White Plains, NY
  (2)  393  $155 
2.
New York, NY
      296   125 
3.
Tinton Falls, NJ
      216   41 
4.
Coram, NY
  (2)  200   47 
5.
Kirkland, WA Phase II
  (2)  176   53 
6.
Hingham, MA
  (2)  235   44 
7.
Northborough, MA
      350   60 
8.
Wilton, CT
  (2)  100   24 
9.
Union City, CA
  (5)  438   120 
10.
Andover, MA
  (2)  115   21 
11.
Norwalk, CT
      319   83 
12.
Sharon, MA
      156   26 
13.
Brooklyn, NY
      628   317 
14.
Pleasant Hill, CA
  (4)  416   153 
15.
Milford, CT
  (2)  284   45 
16.
West Haven, CT
      170   23 
17.
Cohasset, MA
  (2)  200   38 
18.
Quincy, MA
  (2)  146   24 
19.
West Long Branch, NJ
  (3)  216   36 
20.
Plymouth, MA Phase II
      81   17 
21.
Shelton, CT
      302   49 
22.
Shelton, CT II
      171   34 
23.
Roselle Park, NJ
      340   75 
24.
Wanaque, NJ
      210   45 
25.
San Francisco, CA
      152   40 
26.
North Bergen, NJ
  (3)  156   48 
27.
Howell, NJ
      265   42 
28.
Gaithersburg, MD
      254   41 
29.
Highland Park, NJ
      285   67 
30.
Dublin, CA Phase II
      200   52 
31.
Dublin, CA Phase III
      205   53 
32.
Canoga Park, CA
      297   85 
33.
New York, NY II
      680   261 
34.
Camarillo, CA
      376   55 
35.
Bloomingdale, NJ
      173   38 
36.
Greenburgh, NY Phase II
      444   112 
37.
Irvine, CA
  (2)  280   76 
38.
Stratford, CT
  (2)  146   23 
39.
Hackensack, NJ
      210   47 
40.
Oyster Bay, NY
  (2)  150   42 
41.
Saddle Brook, NJ
      300   55 
42.
Oakland, NJ
      308   62 
43.
Randolph, NJ
      128   31 
44.
Irvine, CA II
      180   57 
45.
Garden City, NY
      160   58 
46.
Alexandria, VA
  (5)  283   73 
47.
Tysons Corner, VA
  (5)  439   101 
48.
Yonkers, NY
      400   88 
49.
Plainview, NY
      160   38 
50.
Wheaton, MD
  (5)  320   56 
51.
Yaphank, NY
  (2)  343   57 
52.
Camarillo, CA II
      233   57 
53.
Rockville, MD
  (5)  240   46 
54.
Winchester, MA
      260   65 
 
 
          
 
 
            
 
Total
      14,185  $3,581 
 
 
          

39


 

(1) Total capitalized cost includes all capitalized costs incurred to date (if any) and projected to be incurred to develop the respective community, determined in accordance with GAAP, including land acquisition costs, construction costs, real estate taxes, capitalized interest and loan fees, permits, professional fees, allocated development overhead and other regulatory fees.
 
(2) We own the land parcel, but construction has not yet begun.
 
(3) This Development Right is subject to a joint venture ownership structure.
 
(4) This Development Right is subject to a joint venture arrangement. In connection with the pursuit of this Development Right, $125 million in bond financing was issued and immediately invested in a guaranteed investment contract (“GIC”) administered by a trustee as described in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Item 8 of this report.
 
(5) Represents improved land encumbered with debt. The improved land consists of occupied office buildings and industrial space. Net operating income from incidental operations from the current improvements are recorded as a reduction in the cost basis as described in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Item 8 of this report.
Recent Developments
Sales of Existing Communities. We seek to increase the value of our interests and increase our presence in selected high barrier-to-entry markets where we believe we can:
  apply sufficient market and management presence to enhance revenue growth;
  reduce operating expenses; and
  leverage management talent.
To achieve this increased value creation and presence, we (i) sell assets that do not meet our long-term investment strategy or when capital and real estate markets allow us to realize a portion of the value created over the past business cycle and (ii) redeploy the proceeds from those sales to develop, redevelop and acquire communities. Pending such redeployment, we will generally use the proceeds from the sale of these communities to reduce amounts outstanding under our variable rate unsecured credit facility. On occasion, we will set aside the proceeds from the sale of communities into a cash escrow account to facilitate a non-taxable, like-kind exchange transaction. We sold four communities, including one community previously held by a joint venture entity, containing an aggregate of 1,036 apartment homes, during the period from January 1, 2006 through January 31, 2007. Net proceeds from the sale of these assets were $218,492,000.

40


 

Land Acquisitions. We select land for development and follow established procedures that we believe minimize both the cost and the risks of development. During 2006, we acquired nine land parcels for an aggregate purchase price of $91,574,000. The land parcels purchased, which are currently being developed or are held for future development, are as follows:
                      
       Estimated  Total       
       number  capitalized       
   Gross  of apartment  cost (1)  Date  Construction 
   acres  homes  ($ millions)  acquired  start (2) 
1.
Avalon Cohasset
  62.0   200  $38  January 2006  2008 
 
Cohasset, MA
                    
2.
Avalon Canoga Park
  3.3   210   54  January 2006  2006 
 
Canoga Park, CA
                    
3.
Avalon Jamboree Village
  4.5   280   76  May 2006  2008 
 
Irvine, CA
                    
4.
Avalon at Lexington Hills
  22.5   387   86  June 2006  2006 
 
Lexington, MA
                    
5.
Avalon at Charles Pond (3)
  39.0   200   47  June 2006  2007 
 
Coram, NY
                    
6.
Avalon at the Hingham Shipyard
  12.9   235   44  June 2006  2007 
 
Hingham, MA
                    
7.
Avalon at Oyster Bay
  5.0   150   42  August 2006  2008 
 
Oyster Bay, NY
                    
8.
Avalon Acton (3)
  50.3   380   69  December 2006  2006 
 
Acton, MA
                    
9.
Avalon White Plains
  3.2   393   155  December 2006  2007 
 
White Plains, NY
                    
 
 
                 
 
 
                    
 
Total
  202.7   2,435  $611         
 
 
                 
(1) Total capitalized cost includes all capitalized costs incurred to date (if any) and projected to be incurred to develop the respective community, determined in accordance with GAAP, including land acquisition costs, construction costs, real estate taxes, capitalized interest and loan fees, permits, professional fees, allocated development overhead and other regulatory fees.
(2) Future construction start dates are estimates. There can be no assurance that we will pursue to completion any or all of these proposed developments.
(3) Excludes portion of land acquired that is not planned for development
In addition, in January 2007, we acquired a parcel of land located in Brooklyn, NY for approximately $70,000,000. We expect to begin construction of this high-rise community in the second half of 2007.
Insurance and Risk of Uninsured Losses
We carry commercial general liability insurance and property insurance with respect to all of our communities. These policies, and other insurance policies we carry, have policy specifications, insured limits and deductibles that we consider commercially reasonable. There are, however, certain types of losses (such as losses arising from acts of war) that are not insured, in full or in part, because they are either uninsurable or the cost of insurance makes it, in management’s view, economically impractical. You should carefully review the discussion under Item 1a., “Risk Factors,” for a discussion of risks associated with an uninsured property or liability loss.
Many of our West Coast communities are located in the general vicinity of active earthquake faults. A large concentration of our communities lies near, and thus is susceptible to, the major fault lines in California, including the San Andreas Fault and the Hayward Fault. We cannot assure you that an earthquake would not cause damage or losses greater than insured levels. We have in place with respect to communities located in California, for any single occurrence and in the aggregate, $75,000,000 of coverage with a deductible per building equal to five percent of the insured value of that building. The five percent deductible is subject to a minimum of $100,000 per occurrence. Earthquake coverage outside of California is subject to a $100,000,000 limit, except with respect to the state of Washington, for which the limit is $65,000,000. Our earthquake insurance outside of California provides for a

41


 

$100,000 deductible per occurrence. In addition, up to a policy aggregate of $2,000,000, the next $400,000 of loss per occurrence outside California will be treated as an additional deductible.
We renewed the first $15,000,000 layer of our property insurance policy on May 1, 2006. We renewed the remaining layers on this policy on December 1, 2006. At that time, we elected to renew most of these layers so that they will now expire on May 1, 2007, in order to mitigate the risk of cost escalation and align the renewal date for the upper layers with the renewal date for the primary layer.
Our annual general liability policy and workman’s compensation coverage renewed on August 1, 2006. We have completed our negotiations with the incumbent carrier and the insurance coverage provided for in these renewal policies did not materially change from the preceding year.
Just as with office buildings, transportation systems and government buildings, there have been reports that apartment communities could become targets of terrorism. In December 2005, Congress passed the Terrorism Risk Insurance Extension Act (“TRIEA”) which is designed to make terrorism insurance available. In connection with this legislation, we have purchased insurance for property damage due to terrorism up to $200,000,000. Additionally, we have purchased insurance for certain terrorist acts, not covered under TRIEA, such as domestic-based terrorism. This insurance, often referred to as “non-certified” terrorism insurance, is subject to deductibles, limits and exclusions. Our general liability policy provides TRIEA coverage (subject to deductibles and insured limits) for liability to third parties that result from terrorist acts at our communities. TRIEA is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2007. It is uncertain if Congress will extend TRIEA and continue to provide federal support for terrorism insurance. If Congress does not extend TRIEA, the cost and availability of terrorism insurance may be in question.
Mold growth may occur when excessive moisture accumulates in buildings or on building materials, particularly if the moisture problem remains undiscovered or is not addressed over a period of time. If a significant mold problem arises at one of our communities, we could be required to undertake a costly remediation program to contain or remove the mold from the affected community and could be exposed to other liabilities. For further discussion of the risks and the Company’s related prevention and remediation activities, please refer to the discussion on environmental contamination. We cannot provide assurance that we will have coverage under our existing policies for property damage or liability to third parties arising as a result of exposure to mold or a claim of exposure to mold at one of our communities.

42


 

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are currently involved in litigation alleging that communities constructed by us violate the accessibility requirements of the Fair Housing Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. The lawsuit, Equal Rights Center v. AvalonBay Communities, Inc., was filed on September 23, 2005 in the federal district court in Maryland. The plaintiff seeks compensatory and punitive damages in unspecified amounts as well as injunctive relief (such as modification of existing communities), an award of attorneys’ fees, expenses and costs of suit. The Company has filed a motion to dismiss all or parts of the suit, which has not been ruled on yet by the court. Due to the preliminary nature of the litigation, we cannot predict or determine the outcome of this lawsuit, nor is it reasonably possible to estimate the amount of loss, if any, that would be associated with an adverse decision or settlement.
On January 11, 2007, a former leasing consultant of the Company, individually and on behalf of other leasing consultants allegedly similarly situated, filed suit against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging that the Company did not pay all leasing consultants overtime as required under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The Company disputes this allegation and maintains that it has accurately tracked and paid all leasing consultants overtime as required by law. We cannot predict the outcome of this lawsuit, nor is it reasonably possible at this time to estimate the amount of loss, if any, that would be associated with an adverse decision.
In addition to the matters described above, we are involved in various other claims and/or administrative proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. While no assurances can be given, we do not believe that any of these outstanding litigation matters, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our operations.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of our security holders during the fourth quarter of 2006.

43


 

PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock is traded on the NYSE under the ticker symbol AVB. The following table sets forth the quarterly high and low sales prices per share of our common stock for the years 2006 and 2005, as reported by the NYSE. On January 31, 2007 there were 795 holders of record of an aggregate of 79,344,557 shares of our outstanding common stock. The number of holders does not include individuals or entities who beneficially own shares but whose shares are held of record by a broker or clearing agency, but does include each such broker or clearing agency as one record holder.
                         
  2006 2005
  Sales Price Dividends Sales Price Dividends
  High Low declared High Low declared
Quarter ended March 31
 $110.45  $88.95  $0.78  $75.59  $65.18  $0.71 
 
                        
Quarter ended June 30
 $112.00  $100.50  $0.78  $81.80  $64.99  $0.71 
 
                        
Quarter ended September 30
 $125.21  $110.27  $0.78  $88.23  $78.37  $0.71 
 
                        
Quarter ended December 31
 $134.60  $119.31  $0.78  $92.99  $78.82  $0.71 
We expect to continue our policy of paying regular quarterly cash dividends. However, dividend distributions will be declared at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on actual cash from operations, our financial condition, capital requirements, the annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and other factors as the Board of Directors may consider relevant. The Board of Directors may modify our dividend policy from time to time. In January 2007, we announced that our Board of Directors declared a dividend on our common stock for the first quarter of 2007 of $0.85 per share, a 9.0% increase over the previous quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. The increased dividend will be payable on April 16, 2007 to all common stockholders of record as of April 2, 2007.
During the three months ended December 31, 2006, the Company issued (i) 2,287 shares of common stock in exchange for 2,287 units of limited partnership held by two limited partners of Bay Countrybrook, L.P., and (ii) 3,235 shares of common stock in exchange for 3,235 limited partnership units in Avalon DownREIT V, L.P. The shares were issued in reliance on an exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. AvalonBay is relying on the exemption based on factual representations received from the limited partners who received these shares.

44


 

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
                 
          (c) (d)
          Total Number of Maximum Dollar Amount
  (a) (b) Shares Purchased that May Yet be Purchased
  Total Number of Average Price Paid as Part of Publicly Under the Plans or
  Shares Purchased per Share Announced Plans Programs
Period (1) (1) or Programs (2) (in thousands) (2)
Month Ended October 31, 2006
  549  $121.78     $100,000 
Month Ended November 30, 2006
  757  $131.77     $100,000 
Month Ended December 31, 2006
  254  $127.91     $100,000 
 (1) Includes shares surrendered to the Company in connection with employee stock option exercises or vesting of restricted stock as payment of exercise price or as payment of taxes.
 
 (2) As disclosed for the first time in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, our Board of Directors has adopted a Stock Repurchase Program under which we may acquire, from time to time, shares of common stock in the open market with an aggregate purchase price of up to $100,000,000. In 2006 and 2005, no purchases were made (a) under this program, or (b) outside of this program. In determining whether to repurchase shares, we consider a variety of factors, including our liquidity needs, the then current market price of our shares and the effect of the share repurchases on our per share earnings and FFO. There is no scheduled expiration date to this program.
Information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans is included in the section entitled “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters” on page 69 of this Form 10-K.

45


 

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table provides historical consolidated financial, operating and other data for AvalonBay Communities, Inc. You should read the table with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes included in this report (dollars in thousands, except per share information).
                     
  For the year ended 
  12-31-06  12-31-05  12-31-04  12-31-03  12-31-02 
 
Revenue:
                    
Rental and other income
 $731,041  $666,376  $613,240  $556,582  $531,595 
Management, development and other fees
  6,259   4,304   604   931   2,145 
 
               
Total revenue
  737,300   670,680   613,844   557,513   533,740 
 
               
 
                    
Expenses:
                    
Operating expenses, excluding property taxes
  210,895   191,558   181,351   164,253   147,965 
Property taxes
  68,257   65,487   59,458   53,257   47,580 
Interest expense, net
  111,046   127,099   131,103   130,178   114,282 
Depreciation expense
  162,896   158,822   151,991   138,725   121,995 
General and administrative expense
  24,767   25,761   18,074   14,830   13,449 
Impairment loss
              6,800 
 
               
Total expenses
  577,861   568,727   541,977   501,243   452,071 
 
               
 
                    
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities
  7,455   7,198   1,100   25,535   55 
Venture partner interest in profit-sharing
        (1,178)  (1,688)  (857)
Minority interest in consolidated partnerships
  (573)  (1,481)  (150)  (950)  (865)
Gain on sale of land
  13,519   4,479   1,138   1,234    
 
               
 
                    
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
  179,840   112,149   72,777   80,401   80,002 
Discontinued operations:
                    
Income from discontinued operations
  1,148   14,942   21,134   31,368   44,723 
Gain on sale of communities
  97,411   195,287   121,287   159,756   48,893 
 
               
Total discontinued operations
  98,559   210,229   142,421   191,124   93,616 
 
               
 
                    
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
  278,399   322,378   215,198   271,525   173,618 
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
        4,547       
 
               
 
                    
Net income
  278,399   322,378   219,745   271,525   173,618 
Dividends attributable to preferred stock
  (8,700)  (8,700)  (8,700)  (10,744)  (17,896)
 
               
Net income available to common stockholders
 $269,699  $313,678  $211,045  $260,781  $155,722 
 
               
 
                    
Per Common Share and Share Information:
                    
 
                    
Earnings per common share — basic
                    
Income from continuing operations (net of dividends attributable to preferred stock)
 $2.31  $1.42  $0.96  $1.01  $0.90 
Discontinued operations
 $1.33  $2.88  $1.99  $2.79  $1.36 
 
               
Net income available to common stockholders
 $3.64  $4.30  $2.95  $3.80  $2.26 
 
               
 
                    
Weighted average common shares outstanding — basic
  74,125,795   72,952,492   71,564,202   68,559,657   68,772,139 
 
                    
Earnings per common share — diluted
                    
Income from continuing operations (net of dividends attributable to preferred stock)
 $2.27  $1.40  $0.96  $1.00  $0.89 
Discontinued operations
 $1.30  $2.81  $1.96  $2.73  $1.34 
 
               
Net income available to common stockholders
 $3.57  $4.21  $2.92  $3.73  $2.23 
 
               
 
                    
Weighted average common shares outstanding — diluted
  75,586,898   74,759,318   73,354,956   70,203,467   70,674,211 
 
                    
Cash dividends declared
 $3.12  $2.84  $2.80  $2.80  $2.80 

46


 

                     
  For the year ended 
  12-31-06  12-31-05  12-31-04  12-31-03  12-31-02 
 
Other Information:
                    
Net income
 $278,399  $322,378  $219,745  $271,525  $173,618 
Depreciation — continuing operations
  162,896   158,822   151,991   138,725   121,995 
Depreciation — discontinued operations
     3,241   10,676   14,380   22,482 
Interest expense, net — continuing operations
  111,046   127,099   131,103   130,178   114,282 
Interest expense, net — discontinued operations
        525   2,399   3,122 
 
               
EBITDA(1)
 $552,341  $611,540  $514,040  $557,207  $435,499 
 
               
 
                    
Funds from Operations (2)
 $330,819  $281,773  $246,247  $230,566  $251,410 
Number of Current Communities (3)
  150   143   138   131   137 
Number of apartment homes
  43,141   41,412   40,142   38,504   40,179 
 
                    
Balance Sheet Information:
                    
Real estate, before accumulated depreciation
 $6,578,615  $5,903,168  $5,697,144  $5,431,757  $5,369,453 
Total assets
 $5,813,186  $5,165,060  $5,081,249  $4,909,582  $4,950,835 
Notes payable and unsecured credit facilities
 $2,825,586  $2,334,017  $2,451,354  $2,337,817  $2,471,163 
 
                    
Cash Flow Information:
                    
Net cash flows provided by operating activities
 $351,943  $306,248  $275,617  $239,677  $307,810 
Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities
 $(511,371) $(19,761) $(251,683) $33,935  $(435,796)
Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities
 $162,280  $(282,293) $(29,471) $(279,465) $68,008 
Notes to Selected Financial Data
 
(1) EBITDA is defined as net income before interest income and expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization from both continuing and discontinued operations. Under this definition, EBITDA includes gains on sale of assets and gain on sale of partnership interests. Management generally considers EBITDA to be an appropriate supplemental measure to net income of our operating performance because it helps investors to understand our ability to incur and service debt and to make capital expenditures. EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income (as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or “GAAP”), as an indicator of our operating performance, or to cash flows from operating activities (as determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of liquidity. Our calculation of EBITDA may not be comparable to EBITDA as calculated by other companies.
 
(2) We generally consider Funds from Operations, or “FFO,” as defined below, to be an appropriate supplemental measure of our operating and financial performance because, by excluding gains or losses related to dispositions of previously depreciated property and excluding real estate depreciation, which can vary among owners of identical assets in similar condition based on historical cost accounting and useful life estimates, FFO can help one compare the operating performance of a real estate company between periods or as compared to different companies. We believe that in order to understand our operating results, FFO should be examined with net income as presented in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income included elsewhere in this report.
 
(3) Current Communities consist of all communities other than those which are still under construction and have not received a certificate of occupancy.

47


 

Consistent with the definition adopted by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trustsâ (“NAREIT”), we calculate FFO as net income or loss computed in accordance with GAAP, adjusted for:
  gains or losses on sales of previously depreciated operating communities;
  extraordinary gains or losses (as defined by GAAP);
  cumulative effect of change in accounting principle;
  depreciation of real estate assets; and
  adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.
FFO does not represent net income in accordance with GAAP, and therefore it should not be considered an alternative to net income, which remains the primary measure, as an indication of our performance. In addition, FFO as calculated by other REITs may not be comparable to our calculation of FFO.
FFO also does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP, and therefore should not be considered an alternative to net cash flows from operating activities, as determined by GAAP, as a measure of liquidity. Additionally, it is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs. A presentation of GAAP based cash flow metrics is provided in “Cash Flow Information” in the table on the previous page.
The following is a reconciliation of net income to FFO (dollars in thousands, except per share data):
                     
  For the year ended 
  12-31-06  12-31-05  12-31-04  12-31-03  12-31-02 
Net income
 $278,399  $322,378  $219,745  $271,525  $173,618 
Dividends attributable to preferred stock
  (8,700)  (8,700)  (8,700)  (10,744)  (17,896)
Depreciation — real estate assets, including discontinued operations and joint venture adjustments
  164,749   162,019   157,988   128,278   142,980 
Minority interest expense, including discontinued operations
  391   1,363   3,048   1,263   1,601 
Gain on sale of unconsolidated entities holding previously depreciated real estate assets
  (6,609)            
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
        (4,547)      
Gain on sale of previously depreciated real estate assets
  (97,411)  (195,287)  (121,287)  (159,756)  (48,893)
 
               
Funds from Operations attributable to common stockholders
 $330,819  $281,773  $246,247  $230,566  $251,410 
 
               
 
                    
Weighted average common shares outstanding — diluted
  75,586,898   74,759,318   73,354,956   70,203,467   70,674,211 
FFO per common share — diluted
 $4.38  $3.77  $3.36  $3.28  $3.55 

48


 

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to facilitate an understanding of our business and results of operations. This MD&A should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report. This report, including the following MD&A, contains forward-looking statements regarding future events or trends as described more fully under “Forward-Looking Statements” on page 65 of this report. Actual results or developments could differ materially from those projected in such statements as a result of the risk factors described in Item 1a, “Risk Factors,” of this report.
Overview
Business Description
We are primarily engaged in developing, acquiring, owning and operating apartment communities in high barrier-to-entry markets of the United States. We seek to create long-term shareholder value by accessing capital on cost effective terms; deploying that capital to develop, redevelop and acquire apartment communities in high barrier-to-entry markets; operating apartment communities; and selling communities when they no longer meet our long-term investment strategy or when pricing is attractive.
We believe that apartment communities present an attractive long-term investment opportunity compared to other real estate investments because a broad potential resident base should help reduce demand volatility over a real estate cycle. We intend to continue to pursue real estate investments in markets where constraints to new supply exist, and where new rental household formations are expected to out-pace multifamily permit activity over the course of the real estate cycle. Barriers-to-entry in our markets generally include a difficult and lengthy entitlement process with local jurisdictions and dense urban or suburban areas where zoned and entitled land is in limited supply.
We regularly evaluate the allocation of our investments by the amount of invested capital and by product type within our individual markets, which are located in the Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, Midwest, Pacific Northwest, and Northern and Southern California regions of the United States. Our strategy is to more deeply penetrate these markets with a broad range of products and services and an intense focus on our customer. A substantial majority of our communities are upscale, which generally command among the highest rents in their markets. However, we also pursue the ownership and operation of apartment communities that target a variety of customer segments and price points, consistent with our goal of offering a broad range of products and services.
We believe that, over an entire real estate cycle, lower housing affordability and the limited new supply of apartment homes in our markets will result in a higher propensity to rent and larger revenue and cash flow increases relative to other markets. However, throughout the real estate cycle, apartment market fundamentals, and therefore operating cash flows, are affected by overall economic conditions. A number of our markets experienced economic contraction due to job losses in 2002 and 2003, resulting in a prolonged period of weak apartment market fundamentals (i.e., the ratio of demand, including from new renter household formations, to supply) as reflected in declining rental revenue and demand. However, 2004 was a year of transition with apartment fundamentals further improving in 2005 and 2006. The economic upturn, as evidenced by job growth and declining unemployment claims, and modest increases in net supply, are contributing to the current strong apartment market fundamentals.

49


 

Financial Highlights and Outlook
Strong apartment fundamentals in 2006 were evidenced by the year-over-year rental revenue growth of 6.8% achieved within our Established Community portfolio (as defined later in this report) during the year ended December 31, 2006, comprised of an increase in rental rates of 6.3% and an increase in occupancy of 0.5%. This revenue growth combined with constrained expense growth contributed to our Established Community portfolio achieving year-over-year growth in net operating income (“NOI”) of 9.1% in 2006. For the fourth quarter of 2006, our Established Communities experienced an increase in rental revenue of 7.4% and a corresponding increase in NOI of 10.9% over the prior year period, our strongest operating performance since 2001.
We expect the positive revenue and net operating income growth of Established Communities to continue in 2007 but at a more moderate pace. Modest net new supply, low home affordability and continued but moderating job growth should support favorable apartment fundamentals. We expect modest increases in net rental supply in our markets in 2007 that will remain below the national average. The single-family housing market continues to moderate, such that the increase in home prices is flat or down and for-sale inventory has increased. However, the current gap between the cost to rent and the cost to own continues to make rental apartments an economically attractive housing alternative in our markets. These recent trends increase the likelihood that potential home buyers will extend the period they rent a home. Finally, we expect that job growth will continue in our markets, however, at a more modest rate in 2007. Accordingly, we expect apartment market fundamentals to remain strong in our markets such that apartment rental demand will outpace new supply. Our current financial outlook provides for rental revenue growth of 5.0% to 6.5% in our Established Community portfolio in 2007, and projected NOI growth of 5.5% to 7.5%.
In positioning for future growth, we have increased our development activity and our investments in Development Rights, as discussed below. We currently have in excess of $1,300,000,000 under construction (measured by total projected capitalized cost of the communities at completion, including the portions in which joint venture partners hold an equity or economic interest). For 2007, we expect additional new development activity to be in the range of $1,000,000,000 to $1,300,000,000. In addition, we continue to secure new Development Rights, including the acquisition of land for future development. We currently have Development Rights for construction of new apartment communities that, based on total projected capitalized cost if developed as expected, total approximately $3,600,000,000.
We continue to look for opportunities to acquire existing communities through our investment in and management of a discretionary investment fund (the “Fund”), in which the Company holds an interest of approximately 15%. During its investment period (which will end on or before March 16, 2008), the Fund will be our principal vehicle for acquiring apartment communities, subject to certain exceptions. The Fund acquired five communities for an aggregate purchase price of $223,670,000 during 2006 and has approximately $115,000,000 under contract for acquisition in early 2007. As of January 31, 2007, the total amount invested by the Fund is $514,000,000. We expect the Fund to continue to focus on acquisition opportunities where value can be created, generally through redevelopment, repositioning and market cycle timing opportunities.
Real estate capital flows remain strong, with income investors seeking to acquire existing apartment communities. As a result, opportunities to realize value upon disposition have continued to be available. In 2006, we sold four communities (one through a joint venture ) for an aggregate sales price of $261,850,000 resulting in a gain in accordance with GAAP of $104,020,000. We expect asset sales of approximately $150,000,000 to $200,000,000 in 2007.
For new development, the slowing for-sale market has resulted in increased investment opportunities. We are being selective in pursuing these opportunities, given continued high land prices and construction costs. In addition, we are seeing greater availability of experienced subcontractors and development and construction professionals as a result of slowing construction in both the condominium and single-family housing markets. These positives are somewhat offset by higher construction and development costs.
Communities Overview
Our real estate investments consist primarily of current operating apartment communities, communities in various stages of development (“Development Communities”) and Development Rights (i.e., land or options to purchase land held for development), as further described in Item 2 of this report.

50


 

Our current operating communities are further distinguished as Established Communities, Other Stabilized Communities, Lease-Up Communities and Redevelopment Communities. Established Communities are generally operating communities that are consolidated for financial reporting purposes and were owned and had stabilized occupancy and operating expenses as of the beginning of the prior year, which allows the performance of these communities and the markets in which they are located to be compared and monitored between years. Other Stabilized Communities are generally all other operating communities that have stabilized occupancy and operating expenses during the current year, but had not achieved stabilization as of the beginning of the prior year. Lease-Up Communities consist of communities where construction is complete but stabilization has not been achieved. Redevelopment Communities consist of communities where substantial redevelopment is in progress or is planned to begin during the current year. A more detailed description of our reportable segments and other related operating information can be found in Note 9, “Segment Reporting,” of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Although each of these categories is important to our business, we generally evaluate overall operating, industry and market trends based on the operating results of Established Communities, for which a detailed discussion can be found in “Results of Operations” as part of our discussion of overall operating results. We evaluate our current and future cash needs and future operating potential based on acquisition, disposition, development, redevelopment and financing activities within Other Stabilized, Redevelopment and Development Communities, and discussions related to these segments of our business can be found in “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
The net operating income of our current operating communities, as defined later in this report, is one of the financial measures that we use to evaluate community performance. Net operating income is affected by the demand and supply dynamics within our markets, our rental rates and occupancy levels, and our ability to control operating costs. Our overall financial performance is also impacted by the general availability and cost of capital and the performance of newly developed and acquired apartment communities.
As of December 31, 2006, we owned or held a direct or indirect ownership interest in 167 apartment communities containing 48,294 apartment homes in ten states and the District of Columbia, of which 17 communities were under construction and six communities were under reconstruction. In addition, we owned a direct or indirect ownership interest in Development Rights to develop an additional 54 communities that, if developed in the manner expected, will contain an estimated 14,185 apartment homes.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. If our judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions had been different, or different estimates or assumptions had been made, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied, resulting in different financial results or a different presentation of our financial statements. Below is a discussion of a number of accounting policies that we consider critical to an understanding of our financial condition and operating results that may require complex judgment in their application or require estimates about matters which are inherently uncertain. A discussion of our significant accounting policies, including further discussion of the accounting policies described below, can be found in Note 1, “Organization and Significant Accounting Policies” of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Cost Capitalization
We capitalize costs during the development of assets (including interest and related loan fees, property taxes and other direct and indirect costs) beginning when development efforts commence until the asset, or a portion of the asset, is delivered and is ready for its intended use, which is generally indicated by the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. We capitalize costs during redevelopment of apartment homes (including interest and related loan fees, property taxes and other direct and indirect costs) beginning when an apartment home is taken out-of-service for redevelopment until the apartment home redevelopment is completed and the apartment home is available for a new resident. Rental income and operating expenses incurred during the initial lease-up or post-redevelopment lease-up period are fully recognized as they accrue.

51


 

We capitalize pre-development costs incurred in pursuit of Development Rights for which we currently believe future development is probable. These costs include legal fees, design fees and related overhead costs. Future development of these Development Rights is dependent upon various factors, including zoning and regulatory approval, rental market conditions, construction costs and availability of capital. Pre-development costs incurred in the pursuit of Development Rights for which future development is not yet considered probable are expensed as incurred. In addition, if the status of a Development Right changes, making future development no longer probable, any capitalized pre-development costs are written-off with a charge to expense.
We generally capitalize only non-recurring expenditures. We capitalize improvements and upgrades only if the item: (i) exceeds $15,000; (ii) extends the useful life of the asset; and (iii) is not related to making an apartment home ready for the next resident. Under this policy, a significant portion of our capitalized costs are non-recurring, as recurring make-ready costs are expensed as incurred. Recurring make-ready costs include: (i) carpet and appliance replacements; (ii) floor coverings; (iii) interior painting; and (iv) other redecorating costs. Because we expense recurring make-ready costs, such as carpet replacements, our expense levels and volatility are greatest in the third quarter of each year as this is when we experience our greatest amount of turnover. We capitalize purchases of personal property, such as computers and furniture, only if the item is a new addition and the item exceeds $2,500. We generally expense replacements of personal property.
In 2006, 2005 and 2004, the amounts capitalized (excluding land costs) related to acquisitions, development and redevelopment were $677,587,000, $425,170,000 and $347,091,000, respectively. For Established and Other Stabilized Communities, we recorded non-revenue generating capital expenditures of $18,000,000 or $497 per apartment home in 2006, $16,753,000 or $471 per apartment home in 2005 and $12,347,000 or $354 per apartment home in 2004. In addition, revenue generating, or expense saving capital expenditures, such as water sub metering equipment and cable installations, were $153,000, $817,000 and $637,000 in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The average maintenance costs charged to expense per apartment home, including carpet and appliance replacements, related to these communities was $1,638 in 2006, $1,546 in 2005 and $1,348 in 2004. Historically, we have experienced a gradual increase in capitalized costs and expensed maintenance costs per apartment home as the average age of our communities has increased. We expect to return to the trend of gradual increases in maintenance costs in future years.
Asset Impairment Evaluation
We assess the impairment of our investments and long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. For both our consolidated and unconsolidated entities, factors that could trigger an assessment for impairment include, but are not limited to: i) underperformance of the asset relative to historical or expected future operating results, ii) significant change in legal and economic factors, iii) incurrence of costs significantly in excess of amounts originally forecasted for construction or acquisition of an asset, or iv) an expectation that a long-lived asset will be disposed of at an amount below the current carrying value. We evaluate the key factors necessary in the assessment of asset impairment on a quarterly basis. In 2006, 2005 and 2004, we did not recognize any impairment in value associated with our investments or long-lived assets. We cannot predict the occurrence of future events that may cause an impairment assessment to be performed.
REIT Status
We are a Maryland corporation that has elected to be treated, for federal income tax purposes, as a REIT. We elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (“the Code”), as amended, for the year ended December 31, 1994 and have not revoked such election. A corporate REIT is a legal entity which holds real estate interests and must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it currently distribute at least 90% of its adjusted taxable income to stockholders. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to corporate level federal income tax on taxable income if we distribute 100% of taxable income over time periods allowed under the Code to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates (subject to any applicable alternative minimum tax) and may not be able to elect to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent taxable years.

52


 

Results of Operations
Our year-over-year operating performance is primarily affected by changes in net operating income of our current operating apartment communities due to market conditions; net operating income derived from acquisitions and development completions; the loss of net operating income related to disposed communities; and capital market, disposition and financing activity. A comparison of our operating results for the years 2006, 2005 and 2004 follows (dollars in thousands):
                                 
  2006  2005  $ Change  % Change  2005  2004  $ Change  % Change 
Revenue:
                                
Rental and other income
 $731,041  $666,376  $64,665   9.7% $666,376  $613,240  $53,136   8.7%
Management, development and other fees
  6,259   4,304   1,955   45.4%  4,304   604   3,700   612.6%
 
                        
Total revenue
  737,300   670,680   66,620   9.9%  670,680   613,844   56,836   9.3%
 
                        
 
                                
Expenses:
                                
Direct property operating expenses, excluding property taxes
  169,685   155,481   14,204   9.1%  155,481   148,705   6,776   4.6%
Property taxes
  68,257   65,487   2,770   4.2%  65,487   59,458   6,029   10.1%
 
                        
Total community operating expenses
  237,942   220,968   16,974   7.7%  220,968   208,163   12,805   6.2%
 
                        
 
                                
Corporate-level property management and other indirect operating expenses
  34,177   31,243   2,934   9.4%  31,243   27,956   3,287   11.8%
Investments and investment management
  7,033   4,834   2,199   45.5%  4,834   4,690   144   3.1%
Interest expense, net
  111,046   127,099   (16,053)  (12.6%)  127,099   131,103   (4,004)  (3.1%)
Depreciation expense
  162,896   158,822   4,074   2.6%  158,822   151,991   6,831   4.5%
General and administrative expense
  24,767   25,761   (994)  (3.9%)  25,761   18,074   7,687   42.5%
 
                        
Total other expenses
  339,919   347,759   (7,840)  (2.3%)  347,759   333,814   13,945   4.2%
 
                        
 
                                
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities
  7,455   7,198   257   3.6%  7,198   1,100   6,098   n/a 
Venture partner interest in profit-sharing
           n/a      (1,178)  1,178   (100.0%)
Minority interest in consolidated partnerships
  (573)  (1,481)  908   (61.3%)  (1,481)  (150)  (1,331)  n/a 
Gain on sale of land
  13,519   4,479   9,040   201.8%  4,479   1,138   3,341   293.6%
 
                        
 
                                
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
  179,840   112,149   67,691   60.4%  112,149   72,777   39,372   54.1%
 
                                
Discontinued operations:
                                
 
                                
Income from discontinued operations
  1,148   14,942   (13,794)  (92.3%)  14,942   21,134   (6,192)  (29.3%)
Gain on sale of communities
  97,411   195,287   (97,876)  (50.1%)  195,287   121,287   74,000   61.0%
 
                        
Total discontinued operations
  98,559   210,229   (111,670)  (53.1%)  210,229   142,421   67,808   47.6%
 
                        
 
                                
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
  278,399   322,378   (43,979)  (13.6%)  322,378   215,198   107,180   49.8%
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
           n/a      4,547   (4,547)  n/a 
 
                        
 
                                
Net income
  278,399   322,378   (43,979)  (13.6%)  322,378   219,745   102,633   46.7%
Dividends attributable to preferred stock
  (8,700)  (8,700)        (8,700)  (8,700)      
 
                        
Net income available to common stockholders
 $269,699  $313,678  $(43,979)  (14.0%) $313,678  $211,045  $102,633   48.6%
 
                        
Net income available to common stockholders decreased $43,979,000 or 14.0%, to $269,699,000 in 2006. This decrease is primarily attributable to reduced asset sales and related gains in 2006, partially offset by growth in net operating income from Established Communities and contributions to net operating income from newly developed communities. Net income available to common stockholders increased $102,633,000, or 48.6%, to $313,678,000 in 2005. This increase is primarily attributable to higher gains on sales of assets in 2005, including the gain related to the sale of a technology investment, as well as increased net operating income from Established Communities and newly developed communities.
Net operating income (“NOI”) is considered by management to be an important and appropriate supplemental performance measure to net income because it helps both investors and management to understand the core operations of a community or communities prior to the allocation of any corporate-level or financing-related costs. NOI reflects the operating performance of a community and allows for an easy comparison of the operating performance of individual assets or groups of assets. In addition, because prospective buyers of real estate have different financing and overhead structures, with varying marginal impacts to overhead by acquiring real estate, NOI is considered by many in the real estate industry to be a useful measure for determining the value of a real estate asset or group of assets. We define NOI as total property revenue less direct property operating expenses, including property taxes.

53


 

NOI does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP. Therefore, NOI should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance. NOI should also not be considered an alternative to net cash flow from operating activities, as determined by GAAP, as a measure of liquidity, nor is NOI necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs. A calculation of NOI for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, along with a reconciliation to net income for each year, is as follows (dollars in thousands):
             
  For the year ended 
  12-31-06  12-31-05  12-31-04 
 
Net income
 $278,399  $322,378  $219,745 
Indirect operating expenses, net of corporate income
  28,809   26,675   26,612 
Investments and investment management
  7,033   4,834   4,690 
Interest expense, net
  111,046   127,099   131,103 
General and administrative expense
  24,767   25,761   18,074 
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities
  (7,455)  (7,198)  (1,100)
Minority interest in consolidated partnerships
        1,178 
Venture partner interest in profit-sharing
  573   1,481   150 
Depreciation expense
  162,896   158,822   151,991 
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
        (4,547)
Gain on sale of real estate assets
  (110,930)  (199,766)  (122,425)
Income from discontinued operations
  (1,148)  (14,942)  (21,134)
 
         
Net operating income
 $493,990  $445,144  $404,337 
 
         
The NOI increases in both 2006 and 2005 as compared to the prior years, consist of changes in the following categories (dollars in thousands):
         
  2006  2005 
  Increase  Increase 
Established Communities
 $32,216  $13,052 
 
        
Other Stabilized Communities
  5,497   3,786 
 
        
Development and Redevelopment Communities
  11,133   23,969 
 
      
 
        
Total
 $48,846  $40,807 
 
      
 
The NOI increase in Established Communities in 2006 was largely due to the improved apartment market fundamentals. During 2006, we focused on rental rate growth, while maintaining occupancy of at least 95% in all regions. We will continue to seek increases in rental rates. However we anticipate that increases in rental rates and overall rental revenue growth may moderate in 2007, as we expect continued but moderating job growth (demand) and increased net supply as compared to recent periods. We expect revenue growth from our Established Communities of 5.0% to 6.5% in 2007 as compared to 2006. In addition, although we will continue to aggressively manage operating expenses, there is upward pressure on operating expenses from increasing utility, labor, insurance and property tax expenses. We expect operating expenses at our Established Communities to increase by 3.5% to 5.0% in 2007 as compared to 2006. Overall, we anticipate growth in NOI from our Established Communities of 5.5% to 7.5% in 2007 as compared to 2006.
The Company has given projected NOI growth in 2007 only for Established Communities and not on a company-wide basis. The Company believes that NOI growth of the Established Communities assists investors in understanding management’s estimate of the likely contribution to operations from Established Communities.

54


 

However, the Company has not provided a projection of NOI growth on a company-wide basis due to the difficulty in projecting the timing of new development starts, dispositions and acquisitions, as well as the complexities involved in projecting the allocation of corporate-level property management overhead, general and administrative costs and interest expense to communities not yet developed, disposed or acquired. NOI growth expected from Established Communities is not a projection of the Company’s projected consolidated financial performance or projected cash flow.
Rental and other income increased in 2006 due to increased rental rates and occupancy for our Established Communities, coupled with additional rental income generated from newly developed communities. We expect the strong apartment fundamentals experienced in 2006 to continue in 2007, but at a more moderate pace.
Overall Portfolio — The weighted average number of occupied apartment homes increased to 37,716 apartment homes for 2006 as compared to 36,520 apartment homes for 2005 and 34,540 apartment homes for 2004. This change is primarily the result of an increase in the overall occupancy rate and increased homes available from newly developed and acquired communities, partially offset by communities sold in 2006 and 2005. The weighted average monthly revenue per occupied apartment home increased to $1,610 in 2006 as compared to $1,516 in 2005 and $1,477 in 2004.
Established Communities - Rental revenue increased $35,871,000, or 6.8%, in 2006 and increased $16,523,000, or 3.6%, in 2005. The increases in 2006 and 2005 are due to both increased rental rates and increased economic occupancy as compared to the prior years. For 2006, the weighted average monthly revenue per occupied apartment home increased 6.3% to $1,647 compared to $1,549 in 2005, primarily due to increased market rents and decreased concessions. The average economic occupancy increased from 96.0% in 2005 to 96.5% in 2006. Economic occupancy takes into account the fact that apartment homes of different sizes and locations within a community have different economic impacts on a community’s gross revenue. Economic occupancy is defined as gross potential revenue less vacancy loss, as a percentage of gross potential revenue. Gross potential revenue is determined by valuing occupied homes at leased rates and vacant homes at market rents. We expect rental revenue from Established Communities to increase 5.0% to 6.5% in 2007 as compared to 2006.
We experienced increases in Established Communities’ rental revenue in all six of our regions in 2006 as compared to 2005. The largest increases in rental revenue were in the Pacific Northwest, the Mid-Atlantic and Northern California, with increases of 10.1%, 8.9% and 8.4%, respectively, between years. The Northeast and Northern California regions comprise the majority of our Established Community revenue, and therefore are discussed in more detail below.
Northern California, which represented approximately 27.4% of Established Community rental revenue during 2006, experienced an increase in rental revenue of 8.4% in 2006 as compared to 2005. Average rental rates increased by 7.9% to $1,561 in 2006, and economic occupancy increased 0.5% to 96.7% in 2006. Apartment fundamentals improved in Northern California in 2006, resulting in accelerated revenue growth in this region. We expect Northern California to see continued revenue growth in 2007.
The Northeast region, which accounted for approximately 36.5% of Established Community rental revenue during 2006, experienced an increase in rental revenue of 4.5% in 2006 as compared to 2005. Average rental rates increased 4.4% to $2,032 in 2006 and economic occupancy increased 0.1% to 96.5% during 2006. We expect job growth in 2007 to increase slightly over the growth levels experienced in 2006 in the Northeast and net supply to increase. However, we expect overall apartment fundamentals will remain favorable, resulting in moderate rental rate growth in the Northeast during 2007. The Company believes that Northern New Jersey will lead the region in revenue growth as a result of the strong apartment fundamentals in neighboring New York City. We expect Boston, Massachusetts will lag the region in revenue growth, as economic recovery is not occurring as quickly as in other areas of the region.
In accordance with GAAP, cash concessions are amortized as an offset to rental revenue over the approximate lease term, which is generally one year. As a supplemental measure, we also present rental revenue with concessions stated on a cash basis to help investors evaluate the impact of both current and historical concessions on GAAP based rental revenue and to more readily enable comparisons to revenue as reported by other companies.

55


 

Rental revenue with concessions stated on a cash basis also allows investors to understand historical trends in cash concessions, as well as current rental market conditions.
The following table reconciles total rental revenue in conformity with GAAP to total rental revenue adjusted to state concessions on a cash basis for our Established Communities for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 (dollars in thousands). Information for the year ended December 31, 2004 is not presented, as Established Community classification is not comparable prior to January 1, 2005. See Note 9, “Segment Reporting,” of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
         
  For the year ended 
  12-31-06  12-31-05 
 
        
Rental revenue (GAAP basis)
 $559,771  $523,900 
Concessions amortized
  11,082   20,010 
Concessions granted
  (5,796)  (17,399)
 
      
 
        
Rental revenue adjusted to state concessions on a cash basis
 $565,057  $526,511 
 
      
 
        
Year-over-year % change — GAAP revenue
  6.8%  n/a 
 
        
Year-over-year % change — cash concession based revenue
  7.3%  n/a 
Management, development and other fees increased in 2006 and 2005 due to increased asset management, property management and redevelopment fees earned from the Fund. The Fund was formed in March 2005, and continues to grow through purchases, acquiring five more communities in 2006. In addition, construction and development fees earned from unconsolidated entities in 2006 and 2005 contributed to increased fee income.
Direct property operating expenses, excluding property taxes increased in both 2006 and 2005, primarily due to the addition of recently developed and acquired apartment homes coupled with expense growth in our Established Communities.
For Established Communities, direct property operating expenses, excluding property taxes, increased $3,088,000, or 2.6%, to $120,487,000 in 2006 due primarily to increases in payroll, maintenance and utility costs, partially offset by decreases in marketing and office and administration expenses. During 2005, direct property operating expenses increased $965,000, or 0.9%, to $104,346,000 in 2005 due primarily to increases in utility, maintenance and payroll costs, partially offset by decreases in marketing and bad debt expenses. We expect operating expenses for Established Communities to increase by 3.5% to 5.0% in 2007 as compared to 2006, primarily as a result of continued higher utility and payroll costs, as well as increased insurance costs.
Property taxes increased in both 2006 and 2005 due to overall higher assessments and the addition of newly developed and redeveloped apartment homes, and are impacted by the size and timing of successful tax appeals in both years.
For Established Communities, property taxes increased by $721,000, or 1.4%, in 2006 and $2,527,000, or 5.7%, in 2005, due to overall higher assessments throughout all regions and are impacted by the size and timing of successful tax appeals in both years. We expect property taxes to continue to increase in 2007 as compared to 2006 to reflect increased valuations. However, property tax increases are mitigated for communities in California, where increases in property taxes are limited by law (Proposition 13). We evaluate property tax increases internally, as well as engage third-party consultants, and appeal increases when appropriate.
Corporate-level property management and other indirect operating expenses increased in both 2006 and 2005 due to increased compensation, as well as increased costs relating to corporate initiatives focused on increasing efficiency and enhancing controls at our operating communities.

56


 

Investments and investment management reflects the costs incurred related to investment acquisitions, investment management and abandoned pursuit costs, which include costs incurred on development pursuits not yet considered probable for development, as well as the abandonment or impairment of development pursuits, acquisition pursuits and disposition pursuits. Investments and investment management increased in 2006 as compared to 2005 due primarily to increased compensation costs and increased staffing related to management of the Fund redevelopment activity, coupled with an increase in abandoned pursuit costs. Abandoned pursuit costs were $2,115,000 in 2006, $816,000 in 2005 and $1,726,000 in 2004. Abandoned pursuit costs can be volatile, and the costs incurred in any given period may vary significantly in future years.
Interest expense, net decreased in 2006 as compared to 2005 due primarily to higher levels of capitalized interest in connection with our increased development activity, lower average outstanding balances on our unsecured credit facility and increased interest income. In addition, through a maturity and the subsequent issuance of unsecured notes, we reduced the effective annual interest rate on $150,000,000 of debt by approximately 1%. These decreases in interest expense are partially offset by higher interest rates on variable rate debt in 2006 and the timing of the repayment and re-issuance of unsecured debt in 2005. Interest income increased in 2006 due to higher invested cash balances as well as increases in the interest rate earned on cash deposits. In addition, interest income in 2006 includes interest earned on an escrow funded from a disposition in 2005 that was used in a tax-deferred exchange.
Depreciation expense increased in both 2006 and 2005 primarily due to the completion of development and redevelopment activities, coupled with the timing of depreciation expense for a community previously classified as held for sale.
General and administrative expense (“G&A”) decreased in 2006 and increased in 2005 relative to the prior years primarily due to the incurrence in 2005 of the following: (i) separation costs of approximately $2,100,000 due to the departure of a senior executive; (ii) the accrual of costs related to various litigation matters of approximately $1,500,000; and (iii) increased board of director fees due to the acceleration of equity awards with the resignation of a director due to disability in 2005, partially offset by higher compensation costs in 2006. We expect expensed overhead costs, including G&A, corporate-level property management and investments and investment management, to increase approximately 6.0% to 7.5% in 2007 as compared to 2006 in support of the Company’s continued growth.
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities in 2006 includes our share of gain on the sale of a joint venture community in the amount of $6,609,000, and the release of amounts previously withheld in escrow allowing recognition of the final installment of the gain from the sale of our investment in Rent.com to eBay in the amount of $433,000. Equity in income of unconsolidated entities in 2005 includes the initial gain recognized in the amount of $6,252,000 related to the sale of our investment in Rent.com to eBay.
Minority interest in consolidated partnerships decreased in 2006 as compared to 2005 due to the conversion of limited partnership units, thereby reducing outside ownership interests and the allocation of net income to outside ownership interests. However, minority interest increased in 2005 due to the consolidation of an entity under FASB Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51,” as revised in December 2003. Effective January 1, 2004, we consolidated an entity from which we held a participating mortgage note in accordance with FIN 46. We did not hold an equity interest in this entity, and therefore 100% of the entity’s net loss was recognized as minority interest in consolidated partnerships during the year ended December 31, 2004. In October 2004, we received payment in full of the outstanding mortgage note due from this entity. Upon repayment of the mortgage note, our economic interest in this entity ended, and therefore we discontinued consolidation as this entity was no longer considered a variable interest entity under FIN 46.
Gain on sale of land in 2006 represents the gain on sale of three land parcels located in Danvers, Massachusetts, Jersey City, New Jersey and Stamford, Connecticut. During 2005, we sold three land parcels, one located in Dublin, California, one in Madison, Washington, and one in Freehold, New Jersey.

57


 

Income from discontinued operations represents the net income generated by communities sold during the period from January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2006. See Note 7, “Real Estate Disposition Activities,” of our Consolidated Financial Statements. The decreases in 2006 and 2005 are due to the sale of three consolidated communities in 2006, seven communities and one office building in 2005 and five communities in 2004, eliminating the income generated from the assets upon disposition.
Gain on sale of real estate assets decreased in 2006 as compared to 2005 primarily due to the volume and size of dispositions, coupled with the carrying value of the communities sold. Gain on sale of real estate assets increased in 2005 and decreased in 2004 due to the volume and size of dispositions in each year. The amount of gain realized in any given reporting period depends on many factors, including the number of communities sold, the size and carrying value of those communities and the sales price, which are driven by local and national market conditions.
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle in 2004 is a result of the implementation of FIN 46, discussed above, and represents the difference between the net assets consolidated under FIN 46 and the previously recorded net assets.
Funds from Operations Attributable to Common Stockholders (“FFO”)
FFO is considered by management to be an appropriate supplemental measure of our operating and financial performance. In calculating FFO, we exclude gains or losses related to dispositions of previously depreciated property and exclude real estate depreciation. These amounts are generally excluded in the industry definition of FFO as amounts can vary among owners of identical assets in similar condition based on historical cost accounting and useful life estimates. FFO can help one compare the operating performance of a real estate company between periods or as compared to different companies. We believe that in order to understand our operating results, FFO should be examined with net income as presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements. For a more detailed discussion and presentation of FFO, see “Selected Financial Data,” included in Item 6 of this report.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Factors affecting our liquidity and capital resources are our cash flows from operations, financing activities and investing activities, as well as general economic and market conditions. Operating cash flow has historically been determined by: (i) the number of apartment homes currently owned, (ii) rental rates, (iii) occupancy levels and (iv) operating expenses with respect to apartment homes. The timing, source and amount of cash flows provided by financing activities and used in investing activities are sensitive to the capital markets environment, particularly to changes in interest rates. The timing and type of capital markets activity in which we engage, as well as our plans for development, redevelopment, acquisition and disposition activity, are affected by changes in the capital markets environment, such as changes in interest rates or the availability of cost-effective capital.
We regularly review our liquidity needs, the adequacy of cash flows from operations, and other expected liquidity sources to meet these needs. We believe our principal short-term liquidity needs are to fund:
  normal recurring operating expenses;
 
  debt service and maturity payments;
 
  preferred stock dividends and DownREIT partnership unit distributions;
 
  the minimum dividend payments on our common stock required to maintain our REIT qualification under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986;
 
  development and redevelopment activity in which we are currently engaged; and
 
  capital calls for the Fund, as required.
We anticipate that we can fully satisfy these needs from a combination of cash flow provided by operating activities, proceeds from asset dispositions and borrowing capacity under our variable rate unsecured credit facility, as well as other public or private sources of liquidity.

58


 

Cash and cash equivalents totaled $8,567,000 at December 31, 2006, an increase of $2,852,000 from $5,715,000 at December 31, 2005. The following discussion relates to changes in cash due to operating, investing and financing activities, which are presented in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows included elsewhere in this report.
Operating Activities – Net cash provided by operating activities increased to $351,943,000 in 2006 from $306,248,000 in 2005. The increase was driven primarily by the additional NOI from our Established Communities’ operations, as well as NOI from recently developed communities, partially offset by the loss of NOI from the four communities sold in 2006, as discussed earlier in this report.
Investing Activities – Net cash used in investing activities of $511,371,000 in 2006 related to investments in assets through the development redevelopment and acquisition of apartment communities, partially offset by proceeds from asset dispositions. During 2006, we invested $832,337,000 in the purchase and development of the following real estate and capital expenditures:
  We began the development of eight new communities. These eight communities, if developed as expected, will contain a total of 2,459 apartment homes, and the total capitalized cost, including land acquisition costs, is projected to be approximately $686,600,000. We completed the development of six communities containing a total of 1,368 apartment homes for a total capitalized cost, including land acquisition cost, of $375,200,000.
 
  We began the redevelopment of three consolidated communities, which contain an aggregate of 1,593 apartment homes and, if redeveloped as expected, will be completed for a total redevelopment capitalized cost of $25,800,000, excluding costs incurred prior to redevelopment. We completed the redevelopment of one consolidated community containing 336 apartment homes for a total capitalized cost of $6,000,000, excluding costs incurred prior to redevelopment.
 
  We acquired nine parcels of land in connection with Development Rights, for an aggregate purchase price of $91,574,000.
 
  We had capital expenditures relating to current communities’ real estate assets of $21,289,000 and non-real estate capital expenditures of $957,000.
We disposed of four communities (one through a joint venture) for an aggregate sales price of $261,850,000 and a total gain in accordance with GAAP of $104,020,000. We also disposed of three parcels of land for an aggregate sales price of $19,635,000 and a total gain in accordance with GAAP of $13,519,000. In addition, we received proceeds in the amount of $20,482,000 from the sale of a 70% interest in our investments in Avalon Del Rey Apartments, LLC. For further discussion See Note 6, “Investments in Unconsolidated Entities,” included in Item 8 of this report.
Financing Activities – Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $162,280,000 in 2006. The net cash inflow is due primarily to the proceeds from $500,000,000 of unsecured notes that we issued in September 2006, partially offset by the $150,000,000 of unsecured notes that was repaid upon maturity in July 2006. In addition, net cash provided by financing activities includes the issuance of common stock for option exercises and the issuance of secured mortgage loans, partially offset by dividends paid and repayment of borrowings under our unsecured credit facility. See Note 3, “Notes Payable, Unsecured Notes and Credit Facility,” and Note 4, “Stockholders’ Equity,” of our Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional information.
Variable Rate Unsecured Credit Facility
We entered into a $650,000,000 revolving variable rate unsecured credit facility with a syndicate of commercial banks. JPMorgan Chase Bank, Wachovia Bank, N.A. and Bank of America, N.A. led the syndication effort in varying capacities. Under the terms of the credit facility, we may elect to increase the facility up to $1,000,000,000, provided that one or more banks (from the syndicate or otherwise) voluntarily agree to provide the additional commitment. No member of the syndicate of banks can prohibit such an increase; such an increase in the facility will only be effective to the extent banks (from the syndicate or otherwise) choose to commit to lend additional funds. We pay participating banks, in the aggregate, an annual facility fee of approximately $813,000. The unsecured credit facility bears interest at varying levels based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), our credit rating and on a maturity schedule selected by us. The current stated pricing is LIBOR plus 0.40% per annum (5.72% on January 31, 2007).

59


 

The spread over LIBOR can vary from LIBOR plus 0.325% to LIBOR plus 1.00% based on our credit rating. In addition, a competitive bid option is available for borrowings of up to $422,500,000. This option allows banks that are part of the lender consortium to bid to provide us loans at a rate that is lower than the stated pricing provided by the unsecured credit facility. The competitive bid option may result in lower pricing if market conditions allow. We had no outstanding balance under this competitive bid option at January 31, 2007. We are subject to certain customary covenants under the unsecured credit facility, including, but not limited to, maintaining certain maximum leverage ratios, a minimum fixed charges coverage ratio and minimum unencumbered assets and equity levels. The credit facility matures in November 2011, assuming our exercise of a one-year renewal option. At January 31, 2007, no amounts were outstanding on the credit facility, $38,088,000
was used to provide letters of credit and $611,912,000 was available for borrowing under the unsecured credit facility.
Future Financing and Capital Needs – Debt Maturities
One of our principal long-term liquidity needs is the repayment of long-term debt at the time that such debt matures. For unsecured notes, we anticipate that no significant portion of the principal of these notes will be repaid prior to maturity. If we do not have funds on hand sufficient to repay our indebtedness as it becomes due, it will be necessary for us to refinance the debt. This refinancing may be accomplished by uncollateralized private or public debt offerings, additional debt financing that is collateralized by mortgages on individual communities or groups of communities, draws on our unsecured credit facility or by additional equity offerings. Although we believe we will have the capacity to meet our long-term liquidity needs, we cannot assure you that additional debt financing or debt or equity offerings will be available or, if available, that they will be on terms we consider satisfactory.
The following debt activity occurred during the year ended December 31, 2006:
  We repaid $150,000,000 in previously issued unsecured notes in July 2006, along with any unpaid interest, pursuant to their scheduled maturity. No prepayment penalty was incurred;
 
  We issued a total of $500,000,000 of unsecured notes in September 2006 under our existing shelf registration statement. The offering consisted of two separate tranches of $250,000,000 with an annual effective interest rate of 5.586% and 5.820%, maturing in 2012 and 2016, respectively;
 
  We issued $34,000,000 of variable rate mortgage debt for one community in April 2006, maturing in April 2011;
 
  We issued $93,800,000 of variable rate, tax-exempt debt for one community in December 2006, maturing in November 2037;
 
  We issued $48,500,000 of variable rate, tax-exempt debt for one community in December 2006, maturing in November 2039; and
 
  We issued $45,000,000 of variable rate, tax-exempt debt for one community in December 2006, maturing in July 2040.
In January 2007, the Company filed a shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission, allowing us to sell an undetermined number or amount of certain debt and equity securities as defined in the prospectus. In addition, in January 2007, in conjunction with the inclusion of our common stock in the S&P 500 Index, we issued 4,600,000 shares of our common stock at $129.30 per share. Net proceeds of approximately $594,000,000 will be used for general corporate purposes.

60


 

The table below details debt maturities for the next five years, excluding our unsecured credit facility, for debt outstanding at December 31, 2006 (dollars in thousands).
                                         
  All-In  Principal       
  interest  maturity  Balance outstanding  Scheduled maturities 
Community rate (1)  date  12-31-05  12-31-06  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  Thereafter 
Tax-exempt bonds
                                        
Fixed rate
                                        
CountryBrook
  6.30% Mar-2012 $16,586  $15,990  $634  $676  $719  $766  $816  $12,379 
Avalon at Symphony Glen
  4.90% Jul-2024  9,780   9,780                  9,780 
Avalon View
  7.55% Aug-2024  16,465   15,980   515   555   595   635   680   13,000 
Avalon at Lexington
  6.55% Feb-2025  12,834   12,467   367   415   441   469   498   10,277 
Avalon at Nob Hill
  5.80% Jun-2025  18,494   18,116(2)                 18,116 
Avalon Campbell
  6.48% Jun-2025  33,614   32,776(2)                 32,776 
Avalon Pacifica
  6.48% Jun-2025  15,247   14,867(2)                 14,867 
Avalon Knoll
  6.95% Jun-2026  12,239   11,957   302   324   347   371   398   10,215 
Avalon Landing
  6.85% Jun-2026  6,044   5,903   153   162   173   185   198   5,032 
Avalon Fields
  7.55% May-2027  10,705   10,483   237   256   275   295   316   9,104 
Avalon West
  7.73% Dec-2036  8,259   8,179   92   91   98   105   112   7,681 
Avalon Oaks
  7.45% Jul-2041  17,324   17,205   129   137   147   157   168   16,467 
Avalon Oaks West
  7.48% Apr-2043  17,145   17,036   117   125   133   142   152   16,367 
 
                                
 
          194,736   190,739   2,546   2,741   2,928   3,125   3,338   176,061 
 
Variable rate (3)
                                        
The Promenade
  5.68% Oct-2010  32,100   31,495   651   701   755   29,388       
Waterford
  4.27% Jul-2014  33,100   33,100(4)                 33,100 
Avalon at Mountain View
  4.27% Feb-2017  18,300   18,300(4)                 18,300 
Avalon at Foxchase I
  4.27% Nov-2017  16,800   16,800(4)                 16,800 
Avalon at Foxchase II
  4.27% Nov-2017  9,600   9,600(4)                 9,600 
Avalon at Mission Viejo
  4.82% Jun-2025  7,635   7,635(4)                 7,635 
Avalon at Nob Hill
  3.65% Jun-2025  2,306   2,684(2)                 2,684 
Avalon Campbell
  3.65% Jun-2025  5,186   6,024(2)                 6,024 
Avalon Pacifica
  3.65% Jun-2025  2,353   2,733(2)                 2,733 
Bowery Place I
  4.16% Nov-2037     93,800(5)     521   576   636   703   91,364 
Bowery Place II
  4.23% Nov-2039     48,500(5)           270   298   47,932 
Avalon Acton
  4.96% Jul-2040     45,000(5)                 45,000 
Avalon at Fairway Hills I
  4.91% Jun-2026  11,500   11,500                  11,500 
 
                                
 
          138,880   327,171   651   1,222   1,331   30,294   1,001   292,672 
Conventional loans (6)
                                        
Fixed rate
                                        
$150 million unsecured notes
  6.93% Jul-2006  150,000                     
$150 million unsecured notes
  5.18% Aug-2007  150,000   150,000   150,000                
$110 million unsecured notes
  7.13% Dec-2007  110,000   110,000   110,000                
$50 million unsecured notes
  6.63% Jan-2008  50,000   50,000      50,000             
$150 million unsecured notes
  8.38% Jul-2008  150,000   146,000      146,000             
$150 million unsecured notes
  7.63% Aug-2009  150,000   150,000         150,000          
$200 million unsecured notes
  7.66% Dec-2010  200,000   200,000            200,000       
$300 million unsecured notes
  6.79% Sep-2011  300,000   300,000               300,000    
$50 million unsecured notes
  6.31% Sep-2011  50,000   50,000               50,000    
$250 million unsecured notes
  6.26% Nov-2012  250,000   250,000                  250,000 
$100 million unsecured notes
  5.11% Mar-2013  100,000   100,000                  100,000 
$150 million unsecured notes
  5.52% Apr-2014  150,000   150,000                  150,000 
$250 million unsecured notes
  5.88% Jan-2012     250,000                  250,000 
$250 million unsecured notes
  5.72% Sep-2016     250,000                  250,000 
Wheaton Development Right
  6.99% Oct-2008  4,589   4,513   81   4,432             
Eisenhower Ave. Development Right
  8.08% Apr-2009  4,504   4,402   109   118   4,175          
Twinbrook Development Right
  7.25% Oct-2011  8,379   8,200   193   207   222   239   7,339    
Tysons West Development Right
  5.55% Jul-2028  6,681   6,535   156   162   173   183   193   5,668 
Avalon Orchards
  7.65% Jul-2033  20,136   19,883   272   290   311   333   357   18,320 
 
                                
 
          1,854,289   2,199,533   260,811   201,209   154,881   200,755   357,889   1,023,988 
 
Variable rate (3)
                                        
Avalon Ledges
  6.75% May-2009  19,290   18,635(4)  811   688   17,136          
Avalon at Flanders Hill
  6.75% May-2009  21,935   21,245(4)  926   784   19,535          
Avalon at Newton Highlands
  6.69% Dec-2009  38,905   37,650(4)  1,546   1,397   34,707          
Avalon at Crane Brook
  6.66% Mar-2011     33,535(4)  1,230   1,045   1,106   1,169   28,985    
 
                                
 
          80,130   111,065   4,513   3,914   72,484   1,169   28,985    
 
Total indebtedness — excluding unsecured credit facility
         $2,268,035  $2,828,508  $268,521  $209,086  $231,624  $235,343  $391,213  $1,492,721 
 
                                
 
(1) Includes credit enhancement fees, facility fees, trustees’ fees and other fees.
 
(2) Financed by variable rate, tax-exempt debt, but the interest rate on a portion of this debt is effectively fixed at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 through a swap agreement. The portion of the debt fixed through a swap agreement decreases (and therefore the variable portion of the debt increases) monthly as payments are made to a principal reserve fund.
 
(3) Variable rates are given as of December 31, 2006.
 
(4) Financed by variable rate debt, but interest rate is capped through an interest rate protection agreement.
 
(5) Represents full amount of the debt as of December 31, 2006. Actual amounts drawn on the debt as of December 31, 2006 are $79,849 for Bowery Place I and $0 for both Bowery Place II and Avalon Acton.
 
(6) Balances outstanding represent total amounts due at maturity, and are not net of $2,922 and $818 of debt discount as of December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, as reflected in unsecured notes on our Consolidated Balance Sheets included elsewhere in this report.

61


 

Future Financing and Capital Needs – Portfolio and Other Activity
As of December 31, 2006, we had 17 new communities under construction, for which a total estimated cost of $639,458,000 remained to be invested. In addition, we had six communities which we own, or in which we have a direct or indirect interest, under reconstruction, for which a total estimated cost of $13,791,000 remained to be invested. Substantially all of the capital expenditures necessary to complete the communities currently under construction and reconstruction, as well as development costs related to pursuing Development Rights, will be funded from:
  cash currently on hand invested in highly liquid overnight money market funds and repurchase agreements;
 
  the remaining capacity under our current $650,000,000 unsecured credit facility;
 
  the net proceeds from sales of existing communities;
 
  retained operating cash;
 
  the issuance of debt or equity securities (including proceeds from the recent stock offering); and/or
 
  private equity funding.
Before planned reconstruction activity, including reconstruction activity related to communities acquired by the Fund as discussed below, or the construction of a Development Right begins, we intend to arrange adequate financing to complete these undertakings, although we cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain such financing. In the event that financing cannot be obtained, we may have to abandon Development Rights, write-off associated pre-development costs that were capitalized and/or forego reconstruction activity. In such instances, we will not realize the increased revenues and earnings that we expected from such Development Rights or reconstruction activity and significant losses could be incurred.
We have invested in the Fund, a private, discretionary investment vehicle that acquires and operates apartment communities in our markets. The Fund will serve, until March 16, 2008 or until 80% of its committed capital is invested, as the principal vehicle through which we will invest in the acquisition of apartment communities, subject to certain exceptions. These exceptions include significant individual asset and portfolio acquisitions, properties acquired in tax-deferred transactions and acquisitions that are inadvisable or inappropriate for the Fund. The Fund will not restrict our development activities, and will terminate after a term of eight years, subject to two one-year extensions. The Fund has nine institutional investors, including us, with a combined equity capital commitment of $330,000,000. A significant portion of the investments made in the Fund by its investors are being made through AvalonBay Value Added Fund, Inc., a Maryland corporation that qualifies as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code (the “Fund REIT”). A wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company is the general partner of the Fund and has committed $50,000,000 to the Fund and the Fund REIT (of which approximately $22,944,000 has been invested as of January 31, 2007) representing a 15.2% combined general partner and limited partner equity interest. Under the Fund documents, the Fund has the ability to employ leverage through debt financings up to 65% on a portfolio basis, which, if achieved, would enable the Fund to invest up to $940,000,000 (of which approximately $514,000,000 has been invested as of January 31, 2007). We currently expect that leverage of less than 65% will be employed, reducing the projected investment value to between $850,000,000 and $900,000,000.
From time to time we use joint ventures to hold or develop individual real estate assets. We generally employ joint ventures primarily to mitigate asset concentration or market risk or secondarily as a source of liquidity. We may also use joint ventures related to mixed-use land development opportunities where our partners bring development and operational expertise to the venture. Each joint venture or partnership agreement has been and will continue to be individually negotiated, and our ability to operate and/or dispose of a community in our sole discretion may be limited to varying degrees depending on the terms of the joint venture or partnership agreement. However, we cannot assure you that we will achieve our objectives through joint ventures.

62


 

In evaluating our allocation of capital within our markets, we sell assets that do not meet our long-term investment criteria or when capital and real estate markets allow us to realize a portion of the value created over the past business cycle and redeploy the proceeds from those sales to develop and redevelop communities. In response to real estate and capital markets conditions, we sold four communities, including an investment held in a joint venture, with net proceeds in the aggregate of approximately $218,492,000 from January 1, 2006 through January 31, 2007. Because the proceeds from the sale of communities may not be immediately redeployed into revenue generating assets, the immediate effect of a sale of a community for a gain is to increase net income, but reduce future total revenues, total expenses and NOI. However, we believe that the absence of future cash flows from communities sold will have a minimal impact on our ability to fund future liquidity and capital resource needs.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
In addition to the investment interests in consolidated and unconsolidated real estate entities, we have certain off balance sheet arrangements with the entities in which we invest. Additional discussion of these entities can be found in Note 6, “Investments in Unconsolidated Entities,” and Note 8, “Commitments and Contingencies,” of our Consolidated Financial Statements located elsewhere in this report.
  CVP I, LLC – CVP I, LLC has outstanding tax-exempt, variable rate bonds maturing in November 2036 in the amount of $117,000,000, which have permanent credit enhancement. We have agreed to guarantee, under limited circumstances, the repayment to the credit enhancer of any advances it may make in fulfillment of CVP I, LLC’s repayment obligations under the bonds. We have also guaranteed to the credit enhancer that CVP I, LLC will obtain a final certificate of occupancy for the project (Chrystie Place in New York City) overall once tenant improvements related to a retail tenant are complete, which is expected in 2007. Our 80% partner in this venture has agreed that it will reimburse us its pro rata share of any amounts paid relative to these guaranteed obligations. The estimated fair value of, and our obligation under these guarantees, both at inception and as of December 31, 2006 were not significant. As a result we have not recorded any obligation associated with these guarantees at December 31, 2006.
 
  MVP I, LLC – MVP I, LLC has a construction loan in the amount of $94,400,000 (of which $76,739,000 is outstanding as of December 31, 2006), which matures in September 2010, assuming exercise of two one-year renewal options, and is payable by the unconsolidated real estate entity. In connection with the construction management services that we provided to MVP I, LLC, the entity that owns and developed Avalon at Mission Bay North II in San Francisco, we have provided a construction completion guarantee to the lender in order to fulfill their standard financing requirements related to the construction financing. Construction was completed in 2006, and our obligations under this guarantee will terminate once all of the lender’s standard completion requirements have been satisfied, which we currently expect to occur in 2007. The estimated fair value of and our obligation under this guarantee, both at inception and as of December 31, 2006 was not significant and therefore no liability has been recorded related to this construction completion guarantee as of December 31, 2006.
 
  The Fund – The Fund has 12 mortgage loans with amounts outstanding in the aggregate of $259,645,000. These mortgage loans have varying maturity dates (or dates after which the loans can be prepaid), ranging from February 2007 to October 2014. These mortgage loans are secured by the underlying real estate. In addition, the Fund has a credit facility with $57,400,000 outstanding as of December 31, 2006, which matures in January 2008. The mortgage loans and the credit facility are payable by the Fund with operating cash flow from the underlying real estate, and the credit facility is secured by capital commitments. We have not guaranteed the debt of the Fund, nor do we have any obligation to fund this debt should the Fund be unable to do so.

63


 

   In addition, as part of the formation of the Fund, we have provided to one of the limited partners a guarantee. The guarantee provides that if, upon final liquidation of the Fund, the total amount of all distributions to that partner during the life of the Fund (whether from operating cash flow or property sales) does not equal a minimum of the total capital contributions made by that partner, then we will pay the partner an amount equal to the shortfall, but in no event more than 10% of the total capital contributions made by the partner (maximum of approximately $3,400,000 as of December 31, 2006). As of December 31, 2006, the fair value of the real estate assets owned by the Fund is considered adequate to cover such potential payment to that partner under a liquidation scenario. The estimated fair value of, and our obligation under this guarantee, both at inception and as of December 31, 2006 was not significant and therefore we have not recorded any obligation for this guarantee as of December 31, 2006.
 
  PHVP I, LLC – In connection with the pursuit of a Development Right in Pleasant Hill, California, $125,000,000 in bond financing was issued by the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency (the “Agency”) in connection with the possible future construction of a multifamily rental community by PHVP I, LLC. The bond proceeds were immediately invested in their entirety in a guaranteed investment contract (“GIC”) administered by a trustee. This Development Right is planned as a mixed-use development, with residential, for-sale, retail and office components. The bond proceeds will remain in the GIC until at least June 1, 2007, but no later than December 5, 2007, at which time a loan will be made to PHVP I, LLC to fund construction of the multifamily portion of the development, or the bonds will be redeemed by the Agency. Although we do not have any equity or economic interest in PHVP I, LLC at this time, we do have an option to make a capital contribution to PHVP I, LLC in exchange for a 99% general partner interest in the entity. Should we decide not to exercise this option, the bonds will be redeemed, and a loan will not be made to PHVP I, LLC. The bonds are payable from the proceeds of the GIC and are non-recourse to both PHVP I, LLC and to us. There is no loan payable outstanding by PHVP I, LLC as of December 31, 2006.
 
   In addition, as part of providing construction management services to PHVP I, LLC for the construction of a public garage, we have provided a construction completion guarantee to the related lender in order to fulfill their standard financing requirements related to the garage construction financing. Our obligations under this guarantee will terminate following construction completion of the garage once all of the lender’s standard completion requirements have been satisfied, which we currently expect to occur in 2008. In the third quarter of 2006, significant modifications were requested by the local transit authority to change the garage structure design. We do not believe that the requested design changes impact the construction schedule. However, it is expected that these changes will increase the original budget by an amount up to $5,000,000. We believe that substantially all potential additional amounts are reimbursable from unrelated third parties. At this time we do not believe that it is probable that we will incur any additional costs. The estimated fair value of, and our obligation under this guarantee, both at inception and as of December 31, 2006 was not significant and therefore we have not recorded any obligation for this guarantee as of December 31, 2006.
 
  Avalon Del Rey Apartments, LLC – In the fourth quarter of 2006, we admitted a 70% venture partner to the LLC for an investment of $49,000,000, including the assumption of debt. In conjunction with this investment, we provided an operating guarantee to the joint venture partner. This guarantee provides that if the initial year return earned by the joint venture partner is less than a threshold return of 7% on its initial equity investment, we will pay the joint venture partner an amount equal to the shortfall, up to the 7% threshold return required. As of December 31, 2006, the cash flows and expected return on investment of the community are expected to meet and exceed the initial year threshold return required by our joint venture partner. Therefore we have not recorded any liability associated with this guarantee as of December 31, 2006.
There are no other lines of credit, side agreements, financial guarantees or any other derivative financial instruments related to or between us and our unconsolidated real estate entities. In evaluating our capital structure and overall leverage, management takes into consideration our proportionate share of this unconsolidated debt.

64


 

Contractual Obligations
We currently have contractual obligations consisting primarily of long-term debt obligations and lease obligations for certain land parcels and regional and administrative office space. Scheduled contractual obligations required for the next five years and thereafter are as follows as of December 31, 2006 (dollars in thousands):
                     
  Payments due by period 
      Less than 1          More than 5 
  Total  Year  1-3 Years  3-5 Years  Years 
 
Long-Term Debt Obligations (1)
 $2,828,508  $268,521  $440,710  $626,556  $1,492,721 
 
                    
Operating Lease Obligations (2)
  1,868,720   8,045   16,411   16,156   1,828,108 
 
               
 
                    
Total
 $4,697,228  $276,566  $457,121  $642,712  $3,320,829 
 
               
(1) No balance outstanding under our variable rate unsecured credit facility as of December 31, 2006. Amounts exclude interest payable as of December 31, 2006.
(2) Includes land leases expiring between July 2029 and March 2142. Amounts do not include any adjustment for purchase options available under the land leases.
Inflation and Deflation
Substantially all of our apartment leases are for a term of one year or less. In an inflationary environment, this may allow us to realize increased rents upon renewal of existing leases or the beginning of new leases. Short-term leases generally minimize our risk from the adverse effects of inflation, although these leases generally permit residents to leave at the end of the lease term and therefore expose us to the effect of a decline in market rents. In a deflationary rent environment, we may be exposed to declining rents more quickly under these shorter term leases.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” as that term is defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You can identify forward-looking statements by our use of the words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “assume,” “project,” “plan,” “may,” “shall,” “will” and other similar expressions in this Form 10-K, that predict or indicate future events and trends and that do not report historical matters. These statements include, among other things, statements regarding our intent, belief or expectations with respect to:
  our potential development, redevelopment, acquisition or disposition of communities;
 
  the timing and cost of completion of apartment communities under construction, reconstruction, development or redevelopment;
 
  the timing of lease-up, occupancy and stabilization of apartment communities;
 
  the pursuit of land on which we are considering future development;
 
  the anticipated operating performance of our communities;
 
  cost, yield and earnings estimates;
 
  our declaration or payment of distributions;
 
  our joint venture and discretionary fund activities;
 
  our policies regarding investments, indebtedness, acquisitions, dispositions, financings and other matters;
 
  our qualification as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code;
 
  the real estate markets in Northern and Southern California and markets in selected states in the Mid-Atlantic, Northeast, Midwest and Pacific Northwest regions of the United States and in general;
 
  the availability of debt and equity financing;
 
  interest rates;
 
  general economic conditions; and
 
  trends affecting our financial condition or results of operations.

65


 

We cannot assure the future results or outcome of the matters described in these statements; rather, these statements merely reflect our current expectations of the approximate outcomes of the matters discussed. You should not rely on forward-looking statements because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. These risks, uncertainties and other factors, which we describe in Item 1a, “Risk Factors,” elsewhere in this report, may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from the anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.
In addition, these forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this report. We do not undertake a duty to update these forward-looking statements, and therefore they may not represent our estimates and assumptions after the date of this report.
Some of the factors that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:
  we may fail to secure development opportunities due to an inability to reach agreements with third parties to obtain land at attractive prices or to obtain desired zoning and other local approvals;
 
  we may abandon or defer development opportunities for a number of reasons, including changes in local market conditions which make development less desirable, increases in costs of development and increases in the cost of capital, resulting in losses;
 
  construction costs of a community may exceed our original estimates;
 
  we may not complete construction and lease-up of communities under development or redevelopment on schedule, resulting in increased interest costs and construction costs and a decrease in our expected rental revenues;
 
  occupancy rates and market rents may be adversely affected by competition and local economic and market conditions which are beyond our control;
 
  financing may not be available on favorable terms or at all, and our cash flows from operations and access to cost effective capital may be insufficient for the development of our pipeline which could limit our pursuit of opportunities;
 
  our cash flows may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest, and we may be unable to refinance existing indebtedness or the terms of such refinancing may not be as favorable as the terms of existing indebtedness;
 
  we may be unsuccessful in our management of the Fund and the Fund REIT; and
 
  we may be unsuccessful in managing changes in our portfolio composition.
ITEM 7a. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to certain financial market risks, the most predominant being interest rate risk. We monitor interest rate risk as an integral part of our overall risk management program, which recognizes the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to reduce the potentially adverse effect on our results of operations. The effect of interest rate fluctuations historically has been small relative to other factors affecting operating results, such as rental rates and occupancy. The specific market risks and the potential impact on our operating results are described below.
Our operating results are affected by changes in interest rates as a result of borrowings under our variable rate unsecured credit facility as well as outstanding bonds with variable interest rates. We had $426,795,000 and $209,165,000 in variable rate debt outstanding (excluding variable rate debt effectively fixed through swap agreements) as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. If interest rates on the variable rate debt had been 100 basis points higher throughout 2006 and 2005, our annual interest costs would have increased by approximately $3,027,000 and $3,990,000, respectively, based on balances outstanding during the applicable years.

66


 

We currently use interest rate protection agreements (consisting of interest rate swap and interest rate cap agreements) to reduce the impact of interest rate fluctuations on certain variable rate indebtedness, not for trading on speculative purposes. Under swap agreements:
  we agree to pay to a counterparty the interest that would have been incurred on a fixed principal amount at a fixed interest rate (generally, the interest rate on a particular treasury bond on the date the agreement is entered into, plus a fixed increment); and
 
  the counterparty agrees to pay to us the interest that would have been incurred on the same principal amount at an assumed floating interest rate tied to a particular market index.
As of December 31, 2006, the effect of swap agreements is to fix the interest rate on approximately $65,800,000 of our variable rate, tax-exempt debt. The interest rate protection provided by certain swap agreements on the consolidated variable rate, tax-exempt debt was not electively entered into by us but, rather, was a requirement of either the bond issuer or the credit enhancement provider related to certain tax-exempt bond financings. Had these swap agreements not been in place during 2006 and 2005, our annual interest costs would have been approximately $1,182,000 and $1,878,000 lower, respectively, based on balances outstanding and reported interest rates during the applicable years. Additionally, if the variable interest rates on this debt had been 100 basis points higher throughout 2006 and 2005 and these swap agreements had not been in place, our annual interest costs would have been approximately $37,000 higher in 2006 and $1,200,000 lower in 2005.
Because the counterparties providing the swap agreements are major financial institutions which have an A+ or better credit rating by the Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group and the interest rates fixed by the swap agreements are significantly higher than current market rates for such agreements, we do not believe there is exposure at this time to a default by a counterparty provider.
In addition, changes in interest rates affect the fair value of our fixed rate debt, which impacts the fair value of our aggregate indebtedness. Debt securities and notes payable (excluding amounts outstanding under our variable rate unsecured credit facility) with an aggregate carrying value of $2,828,508,000 at December 31, 2006 had an estimated aggregate fair value of $2,939,717,000 at December 31, 2006. Fixed rate debt (excluding our variable rate debt effectively fixed through swap agreements) represented $2,324,513,000 of the carrying value and $2,435,722,000 of the fair value at December 31, 2006. If interest rates had been 100 basis points higher as of December 31, 2006, the fair value of this fixed rate debt would have decreased by $102,909,000.
We do not have any exposure to foreign currency or equity price risk, and our exposure to commodity price risk is insignificant.

67


 

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The response to this Item 8 is included as a separate section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9a. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. We continue to review and document our disclosure controls and procedures, including our internal control over financial reporting, and may from time to time make changes aimed at enhancing their effectiveness and to ensure that our systems evolve with our business.
(b) Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on that evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2006.
  Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included elsewhere herein.
(c) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9b. OTHER INFORMATION
     None.

68


 

PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Information pertaining to directors and executive officers of the Company and the Company’s Code of Conduct are incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the year covered by this Form 10-K with respect to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 16, 2007.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information pertaining to executive compensation is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the year covered by this Form 10-K with respect to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 16, 2007.
 
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
  
Information pertaining to security ownership of management and certain beneficial owners of the Company’s common stock is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the year covered by this Form 10-K with respect to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 16, 2007.
  
The Company maintains the 1994 Stock Incentive Plan (the “1994 Plan”) and the 1996 Non-Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”), pursuant to which common stock or other equity awards may be issued or granted to eligible persons.
 
The following table gives information about equity awards under the Company’s 1994 Plan and ESPP as of December 31, 2006:
             
  (a)  (b)  (c) 
          Number of securities 
          remaining available for future 
  Number of securities to be  Weighted-average  issuance under equity 
  issued upon exercise of  exercise price of  compensation plans 
  outstanding options,  outstanding options,  (excluding securities 
Plan category warrants and rights  warrants and rights  reflected in column (a)) 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)
  2,603,738 (2)(3)  $69.65 (3)(4)  1,791,861 (5)
 
            
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(6)
     n/a   789,312 
 
         
Total
  2,603,738  $69.65 (3)(4)  2,581,173 
 
         

(1) Consists of the 1994 Plan.
 
(2) Includes 116,499 deferred units granted under the 1994 Plan, which, subject to vesting requirements, will convert in the future to common stock on a one-for-one basis, but does not include 274,986 shares of restricted stock that are outstanding and that are already reflected in the Company’s outstanding shares.
 
(3) Does not include outstanding options to acquire 4,240 shares, at a weighted-average exercise price of $36.83 per share, that were assumed, in connection with the 1998 merger of Avalon Properties, Inc. with and into the Company, under the Avalon Properties, Inc. 1995 Equity Incentive Plan and the Avalon Properties, Inc. 1993 Stock Option and Incentive Plan.

69


 

(4) Excludes deferred units granted under the 1994 Plan, which, subject to vesting requirements, will convert in the future to common stock on a one-for-one basis.
 
(5) The 1994 Plan incorporates an evergreen formula pursuant to which the aggregate number of shares reserved for issuance under the 1994 Plan will increase annually. On each January 1, the aggregate number of shares reserved for issuance under the 1994 Plan will increase by a number of shares equal to a percentage (ranging from 0.48% to 1.00%) of all outstanding shares of common stock and operating partnership units at the end of the year. The exact percentage used is determined based on the percentage of all awards made under the 1994 Plan during the calendar year that were in the form of stock options with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of the grant. In accordance with this procedure, on January 1, 2007, the maximum number of shares remaining available for future issuance under the 1994 Plan was increased by 748,133 to 2,539,994.
 
(6) Consists of the ESPP.
The ESPP, which was adopted by the Board of Directors on October 29, 1996, has not been approved by our shareholders. A further description of the ESPP appears in Note 10, “Stock-Based Compensation Plans,” of our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Information pertaining to certain relationships and related transactions is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the year covered by this Form 10-K with respect to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 16, 2007.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Information pertaining to the fees paid to and services provided by the Company’s principal accountant is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the year covered by this Form 10-K with respect to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 16, 2007.

70


 

PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
15(a)(1) Financial Statements
Index to Financial Statements
Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule:
   
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 F-1
 
  
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2006 and 2005
 F-3
 
  
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
 F-4
 
  
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
 F-5
 
  
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
 F-6
 
  
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 F-8
15(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedule
   
Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
 F-35
15(a)(3) Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the accompanying Index to Exhibits are filed as a part of this report.

71


 

INDEX TO EXHIBITS
     
3(i).1
  Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Articles of Incorporation of the Company, dated as of June 4, 1998. (Refiled herewith.)
 
    
3(i).2
   Articles of Amendment, dated as of October 2, 1998. (Refiled herewith.)
 
    
3(i).3
   Articles Supplementary, dated as of October 13, 1998, relating to the 8.70% Series H Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. (Refiled herewith.)
 
    
3(ii).1
   Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, as adopted by the Board of Directors on February 13, 2003. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) to Form 10-K of the Company filed March 11, 2003.)
 
    
4.1
   Second Supplemental Indenture of Avalon Properties dated as of December 16, 1997. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 10-K of the Company filed March 11, 2003.)
 
    
4.2
   Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of January 16, 1998, between the Company and State Street Bank and Trust Company, as Trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form S-3ASR of the Company filed January 8, 2007.)
 
    
4.3
   First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 20, 1998, between the Company and State Street Bank and Trust Company as Trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form S-3ASR of the Company filed January 8, 2007.)
 
    
4.4
   Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 7, 1998, between the Company and State Street Bank and Trust Company as Trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form S-3ASR of the Company filed January 8, 2007.)
 
    
4.5
   Amended and Restated Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 10, 2000 between the Company and State Street Bank and Trust Company as Trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Form S-3ASR of the Company filed January 8, 2007.)
 
    
4.6
   Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 18, 2006, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Form S-3ASR of the Company filed January 8, 2007.)
 
    
4.7
   Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan of the Company filed September 14, 1999. (Incorporated by reference to Form S-3 of the Company, File No. 333-87063.)
 
    
4.8
   Amendment to the Company’s Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan filed on December 17, 1999. (Incorporated by reference to the Prospectus Supplement filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 on December 17, 1999.)
 
    
4.9
   Amendment to the Company’s Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan filed on March 26, 2004. (Incorporated by reference to the Prospectus Supplement filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 on March 26, 2004.)
 
    
10.1
   Amended and Restated Distribution Agreement, dated August 6, 2003, among AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (the “Company”) and the Agents, including Administrative Procedures, relating

72


 

     
 
   to the MTNs. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-K of the Company filed March 5, 2004.)
 
    
10.2
  Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of AvalonBay Value Added Fund, L.P., dated as of March 16, 2005. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q of the Company filed May 6, 2005.)
 
    
10.3+
  Endorsement Split Dollar Agreements and Amendments thereto with Messrs. Blair, Naughton, Fuller, Sargeant, Horey and Meyer (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q of the Company filed May 6, 2005.)
 
    
10.4+
  Employment Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2003, between the Company and Thomas J. Sargeant. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (333-103755), filed July 7, 2003.)
 
    
10.5+
  First Amendment to Employment Agreement between the Company and Thomas J. Sargeant, dated as of March 31, 2005. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-Q of the Company filed May 6, 2005.)
 
    
10.6+
  Employment Agreement, dated as of January 10, 2003, between the Company and Bryce Blair. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-K of the Company filed March 11, 2003.)
 
    
10.7+
  First Amendment to Employment Agreement between the Company and Bryce Blair, dated as of March 31, 2005. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q of the Company filed May 6, 2005.)
 
    
10.8+
  Employment Agreement, dated as of February 26, 2001, between the Company and Timothy J. Naughton. (Refiled herewith.)
 
    
10.9+
  First Amendment to Employment Agreement between the Company and Timothy J. Naughton, dated as of March 31, 2005. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-Q of the Company filed May 6, 2005.)
 
    
10.10+
  Employment Agreement, dated as of September 10, 2001, between the Company and Leo S. Horey. (Refiled herewith.)
 
    
10.11+
  First Amendment to Employment Agreement between the Company and Leo S. Horey, dated as of March 31, 2005. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Form 10-Q of the Company filed May 6, 2005).
 
    
10.12+
  Employment Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2001, between the Company and Samuel B. Fuller. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Form 10-K of the Company filed March 26, 2002.)
 
    
10.13+
  First Amendment to Employment Agreement between the Company and Samuel B. Fuller, dated as of March 31, 2005. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Form 10-Q of the Company filed May 6, 2005).
 
    
10.14+
  Separation Agreement between the Company and Samuel B. Fuller, dated as of April 6, 2005. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Form 10-Q of the Company filed May 6, 2005.)

73


 

     
10.15+
  Retirement Agreement, dated as of March 24, 2000, between the Company and Gilbert M. Meyer. (Refiled herewith.)
 
    
10.16+
  First Amendment to Retirement Agreement between the Company and Gilbert M. Meyer, dated as of March 31, 2005. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Form 10-Q of the Company filed May 6, 2005).
 
    
10.17+
  Avalon Properties, Inc. 1993 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. (Refiled herewith.)
 
    
10.18+
  Avalon Properties, Inc. 1995 Equity Incentive Plan. (Refiled herewith.)
 
    
10.19+
  Amendment, dated May 6, 1999, to the Avalon Properties Amended and Restated 1995 Equity Incentive Plan. (Refiled herewith.)
 
    
10.20+
  AvalonBay Communities, Inc. 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated in full on December 8, 2004. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.B 1 to Form 8-K of the Company filed December 14, 2004.)
 
    
10.21+
  Amendment, dated February 9, 2006, to the AvalonBay Communities, Inc. 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated on December 8, 2004. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to Form 10-K of the Company filed March 14, 2006.)
 
    
10.22+
  Amendment, dated December 6, 2006, to the AvalonBay Communities, Inc. 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated on December 8, 2004. (Filed herewith.)
 
    
10.23+
  1996 Non-Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan, dated June 26, 1997, as amended and restated. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Post-effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-8 of the Company filed June 26, 1997, File No. 333-16837.)
 
    
10.24+
  1996 Non-Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan — Plan Information Statement dated June 26, 1997. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Form S-8 of the company, File No. 333-16837.)
 
    
10.25+
  Form of Indemnity Agreement between the Company and its Directors. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q of the Company filed November 9, 2005.)
 
    
10.26+
  The Company’s Officer Severance Plan adopted on September 9, 1999. (Refiled herewith.)
 
    
10.27+
  Form of AvalonBay Communities, Inc. Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (1994 Stock Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on November 4, 2004.).
 
    
10.28+
  Form of AvalonBay Communities, Inc. Incentive Stock Option Agreement (1994 Stock Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on November 4, 2004.)
 
    
10.29+
  Form of AvalonBay Communities, Inc. Employee Stock Grant and Restricted Stock Agreement. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on November 4, 2004.)

74


 

     
10.30+
  Form of AvalonBay Communities, Inc. Director Restricted Unit Agreement. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on November 4, 2004.)
 
    
10.31+
  Form of AvalonBay Communities, Inc. Director Restricted Stock Agreement. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on November 4, 2004.)
 
    
10.32
  Amended and Restated Revolving Loan Agreement, dated as of May 24, 2004, among the Company, as Borrower, JPMorgan Chase Bank and Wachovia Bank, N.A., each as a Bank and Syndication Agent, Bank of America, successor in interest to Fleet National Bank, as a Bank, Swing Lender and Issuing Bank, Morgan Stanley Bank, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, each as a Bank and Documentation Agent, the other banks signatory thereto, each as a Bank, J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc., as Sole Bookrunner and Lead Arranger, and Bank of America, successor in interest to Fleet National Bank, as Administrative Agent. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q of the Company filed August 6, 2004.)
 
    
10.33+
  Rules and Procedures for Non-Employee Directors’ Deferred Compensation Program adopted on November 20, 2006. (Filed herewith.)
 
    
10.34+
  Compensation Arrangements for Non-Employee Directors. (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on February 14, 2006.)
 
    
12.1
  Statements re: Computation of Ratios. (Filed herewith.)
 
    
21.1
  Schedule of Subsidiaries of the Company. (Filed herewith.)
 
    
23.1
  Consent of Ernst & Young LLP. (Filed herewith.)
 
    
31.1
  Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Executive Officer). (Filed herewith.)
 
    
31.2
  Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Financial Officer). (Filed herewith.)
 
    
32
  Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer). (Filed herewith.)
 
+ Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed or incorporated by reference as an exhibit to this Form 10-K pursuant to Item 154(c) of Form 10-K.

75


 

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
     
 AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
 
 
Date: February 28, 2007 By:  /s/ Bryce Blair 
  Bryce Blair, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive  
  Officer  
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
       
Date: February 28, 2007
 By: /s/ Bryce Blair   
 
   
 
Bryce Blair, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
  
 
   (Principal Executive Officer)  
 
      
Date: February 28, 2007
 By: /s/ Thomas J. Sargeant   
 
   
 
Thomas J. Sargeant, Chief Financial Officer
  
 
   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  
 
      
Date: February 28, 2007
 By: /s/ Bruce A. Choate   
 
   
 
Bruce A. Choate, Director
  
 
      
Date: February 28, 2007
 By: /s/ John J. Healy, Jr.   
 
   
 
John J. Healy, Jr., Director
  
 
      
Date: February 28, 2007
 By: /s/ Gilbert M. Meyer   
 
   
 
Gilbert M. Meyer, Director
  
 
      
Date: February 28, 2007
 By: /s/ Timothy J. Naughton   
 
   
 
Timothy J. Naughton, Director
  
 
      
Date: February 28, 2007
 By: /s/ Lance R. Primis   
 
   
 
Lance R. Primis, Director
  
 
      
Date: February 28, 2007
 By: /s/ H. Jay Sarles   
 
   
 
H. Jay Sarles, Director
  
 
      
Date: February 28, 2007
 By: /s/ Allan D. Schuster   
 
   
 
Allan D. Schuster, Director
  
 
      
Date: February 28, 2007
 By: /s/ Amy P. Williams   
 
   
 
Amy P. Williams, Director
  

76


 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of AvalonBay Communities, Inc. as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of AvalonBay Communities, Inc. at December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of AvalonBay Communities, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 26, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
McLean, Virginia
February 26, 2007

F-1


 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.:
We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting in Item 9a., that AvalonBay Communities, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). AvalonBay Communities, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, management’s assessment that AvalonBay Communities, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, AvalonBay Communities, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of AvalonBay Communities, Inc. as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006 of AvalonBay Communities, Inc. and our report dated February 26, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
McLean, Virginia
February 26, 2007

F-2


 

AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
         
  12-31-06  12-31-05 
 
        
ASSETS
        
Real estate:
        
Land
 $958,254  $872,822 
Buildings and improvements
  4,560,457   4,254,914 
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
  143,480   131,689 
 
      
 
  5,662,191   5,259,425 
Less accumulated depreciation
  (1,099,834)  (937,824)
 
      
Net operating real estate
  4,562,357   4,321,601 
Construction in progress, including land
  641,781   261,743 
Land held for development
  209,568   179,739 
Operating real estate assets held for sale, net
  64,351   182,705 
 
      
Total real estate, net
  5,478,057   4,945,788 
 
        
Cash and cash equivalents
  8,567   5,715 
Cash in escrow
  136,989   48,266 
Resident security deposits
  26,574   26,290 
Investments in unconsolidated real estate entities
  42,724   41,942 
Deferred financing costs, net
  26,343   17,976 
Deferred development costs
  39,365   31,467 
Prepaid expenses and other assets
  54,567   47,616 
 
      
Total assets
 $5,813,186  $5,165,060 
 
      
 
        
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
        
Unsecured notes, net
 $2,153,078  $1,809,182 
Variable rate unsecured credit facility
     66,800 
Mortgage notes payable
  672,508   458,035 
Dividends payable
  60,417   54,476 
Payables for construction
  59,232   24,690 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
  112,219   82,205 
Accrued interest payable
  37,236   34,649 
Resident security deposits
  38,803   35,544 
Liabilities related to real estate assets held for sale
  42,985   38,352 
 
      
Total liabilities
  3,176,478   2,603,933 
 
      
 
        
Minority interest of unitholders in consolidated partnerships
  5,270   19,464 
 
        
Commitments and contingencies
       
 
        
Stockholders’ equity:
        
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; $25 liquidation preference; 50,000,000 shares authorized at both December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005; 4,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at both December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005
  40   40 
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 140,000,000 shares authorized at both December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005; 74,668,372 and 73,663,048 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively
  747   737 
Additional paid-in capital
  2,482,516   2,429,568 
Accumulated earnings less dividends
  151,714   115,788 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
  (3,579)  (4,470)
 
      
Total stockholders’ equity
  2,631,438   2,541,663 
 
      
 
        
 
      
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
 $5,813,186  $5,165,060 
 
      
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-3


 

AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
             
  For the year ended 
  12-31-06  12-31-05  12-31-04 
Revenue:
            
Rental and other income
 $731,041  $666,376  $613,240 
Management, development and other fees
  6,259   4,304   604 
 
         
Total revenue
  737,300   670,680   613,844 
 
         
 
            
Expenses:
            
Operating expenses, excluding property taxes
  210,895   191,558   181,351 
Property taxes
  68,257   65,487   59,458 
Interest expense, net
  111,046   127,099   131,103 
Depreciation expense
  162,896   158,822   151,991 
General and administrative expense
  24,767   25,761   18,074 
 
         
Total expenses
  577,861   568,727   541,977 
 
         
 
            
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities
  7,455   7,198   1,100 
Venture partner interest in profit-sharing
        (1,178)
Minority interest in consolidated partnerships
  (573)  (1,481)  (150)
Gain on sale of land
  13,519   4,479   1,138 
 
         
 
            
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
  179,840   112,149   72,777 
 
         
 
            
Discontinued operations:
            
Income from discontinued operations
  1,148   14,942   21,134 
Gain on sale of communities
  97,411   195,287   121,287 
 
         
Total discontinued operations
  98,559   210,229   142,421 
 
         
 
            
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
  278,399   322,378   215,198 
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
        4,547 
 
         
 
            
Net income
  278,399   322,378   219,745 
Dividends attributable to preferred stock
  (8,700)  (8,700)  (8,700)
 
         
 
            
Net income available to common stockholders
 $269,699  $313,678  $211,045 
 
         
 
            
Other comprehensive income:
            
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedges
  891   2,626   1,116 
 
         
Comprehensive income
 $270,590  $316,304  $212,161 
 
         
 
            
Earnings per common share — basic:
            
Income from continuing operations (net of dividends attributable to preferred stock)
 $2.31  $1.42  $0.96 
Discontinued operations
  1.33   2.88   1.99 
 
         
Net income available to common stockholders
 $3.64  $4.30  $2.95 
 
         
 
            
Earnings per common share — diluted:
            
Income from continuing operations (net of dividends attributable to preferred stock)
 $2.27  $1.40  $0.96 
Discontinued operations
  1.30   2.81   1.96 
 
         
Net income available to common stockholders
 $3.57  $4.21  $2.92 
 
         
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-4


 

AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Dollars in thousands)
                                 
                      Accumulated  Accumulated    
  Shares issued          Additional  earnings  other  Total 
  Preferred  Common  Preferred  Common  paid-in  less  comprehensive  stockholders’ 
  stock  stock  stock  stock  capital  dividends  loss  equity 
 
                                
Balance at December 31, 2003
  4,000,000   70,937,526  $40  $709  $2,316,773  $2,024  $(8,212) $2,311,334 
 
                                
Net income
                 219,745      219,745 
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedges
                    1,116   1,116 
Dividends declared to common and preferred stockholders
                 (210,338)     (210,338)
Issuance of common stock
     1,644,550      17   59,147   (662)     58,502 
Amortization of deferred compensation
              4,932         4,932 
 
                        
 
                                
Balance at December 31, 2004
  4,000,000   72,582,076   40   726   2,380,852   10,769   (7,096)  2,385,291 
Net income
                 322,378      322,378 
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedges
                    2,626   2,626 
Dividends declared to common and preferred stockholders
                 (216,982)     (216,982)
Issuance of common stock
     1,080,972      11   40,378   (377)     40,012 
Amortization of deferred compensation
              8,338         8,338 
 
                        
 
                                
Balance at December 31, 2005
  4,000,000   73,663,048   40   737   2,429,568   115,788   (4,470)  2,541,663 
 
                                
Net income
                 278,399      278,399 
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedges
                    891   891 
Dividends declared to common and preferred stockholders
                 (241,155)     (241,155)
Issuance of common stock
     1,005,324      10   38,839   (1,318)     37,531 
Amortization of deferred compensation
              14,109         14,109 
 
                        
 
                                
Balance at December 31, 2006
  4,000,000   74,668,372  $40  $747  $2,482,516  $151,714  $(3,579) $2,631,438 
 
                        
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-5


 

AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
             
  For the year ended 
  12-31-06  12-31-05  12-31-04 
Cash flows from operating activities:
            
Net income
 $278,399  $322,378  $219,745 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
            
Depreciation expense
  162,896   158,822   151,991 
Depreciation expense from discontinued operations
     3,241   10,676 
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt premium/discount
  4,474   4,022   3,962 
Amortization of deferred compensation
  10,095   4,292   2,593 
Income allocated to minority interest in consolidated partnerships
  573   1,481   187 
Income allocated to venture partner interest in profit-sharing
        1,178 
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities, net of eliminations
  (6,480)  (6,565)  (1,100)
Return on investment of unconsolidated entities
  298   330   43 
Gain on sale of real estate assets
  (110,930)  (199,766)  (122,425)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
        (4,547)
Increase in cash in operating escrows
  (844)  (4,344)  (1,451)
Decrease (increase) in resident security deposits, prepaid expenses and other assets
  (2,197)  8,547   (10,589)
Increase in accrued expenses, other liabilities and accrued interest payable
  15,659   13,810   25,354 
 
         
Net cash provided by operating activities
  351,943   306,248   275,617 
 
         
 
            
Cash flows from investing activities:
            
Development/redevelopment of real estate assets including land acquisitions and deferred development costs
  (735,167)  (382,871)  (355,938)
Acquisition of real estate assets, including partner equity interest
  (74,924)  (57,415)  (128,238)
Capital expenditures — existing real estate assets
  (21,289)  (17,570)  (12,984)
Capital expenditures — non-real estate assets
  (957)  (1,520)  (860)
Proceeds from sale of real estate and technology investments, including reimbursement for Fund communities, net of selling costs
  272,223   469,292   219,649 
Increase (decrease) in payables for construction
  34,542   5,198   (3,962)
Decrease (increase) in cash in construction escrows
  19,572   (21,784)  201 
Repayment of participating mortgage note, including interest and prepayment premium
        34,846 
Increase in investments in unconsolidated real estate entities
  (5,371)  (13,091)  (4,397)
 
         
Net cash used in investing activities
  (511,371)  (19,761)  (251,683)
 
         
 
            
Cash flows from financing activities:
            
Issuance of common stock
  26,551   36,611   54,031 
Dividends paid
  (234,958)  (215,391)  (209,095)
Net borrowings (repayments) under unsecured credit facility
  (66,800)  (35,200)  50,900 
Issuance of mortgage notes payable and draws on construction loans
  113,849   26,269   105,843 
Repayments of mortgage notes payable
  (6,827)  (41,932)  (40,270)
Issuance (repayment) of unsecured notes
  343,743   (50,000)  25,000 
Payment of deferred financing costs
  (12,698)  (1,292)  (9,318)
Redemption of units for cash by minority partners
  (80)  (50)  (1,691)
Distributions to DownREIT partnership unitholders
  (392)  (1,194)  (1,425)
Distributions to joint venture and profit-sharing partners
  (108)  (114)  (3,446)
 
         
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
  162,280   (282,293)  (29,471)
 
         
 
            
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
  2,852   4,194   (5,537)
 
            
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
  5,715   1,521   7,058 
 
         
 
            
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
 $8,567  $5,715  $1,521 
 
         
 
            
Cash paid during year for interest, net of amount capitalized
 $102,640  $121,526  $124,895 
 
         
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-6


 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities (dollars in thousands):
During the year ended December 31, 2006:
     
 
  As described in Note 4, “Stockholders’ Equity,” 122,172 shares of common stock valued at $12,568 were issued in connection with stock grants, 2,306 shares valued at $256 were issued through the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan, 47,411 shares valued at $3,449 were withheld to satisfy employees’ tax withholding and other liabilities and 5,910 shares valued at $193 were forfeited, for a net value of $9,182. In addition, the Company granted 849,769 options for common stock, net of forfeitures, at a value of $9,946.
 
  308,345 units of limited partnership, valued at $14,166, were presented for redemption to the DownREIT partnerships that issued such units and were acquired by the Company in exchange for an equal number of shares of the Company’s common stock.
 
  The Company issued $187,300 of variable rate tax-exempt debt, of which $107,451 in proceeds were not received, but placed in an escrow until requisitioned for construction funding.
 
  The Company recorded a decrease to other liabilities and a corresponding gain to other comprehensive income of $891 to adjust the Company’s Hedged Derivatives (as defined in Note 5, “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”) to their fair value.
 
  Common and preferred dividends declared but not paid totaled $60,417.
 
    
During the year ended December 31, 2005:
 
    
 
  165,790 shares of common stock were issued in connection with stock grants, 1,295 shares were issued through the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan, 8,971 shares were issued to a member of the Board of Directors in fulfillment of a deferred stock award, 50,916 shares were withheld to satisfy employees’ tax withholding and other liabilities and 9,965 shares were forfeited, for a net value of $9,317. In addition, the Company granted 696,484 options for common stock, net of forfeitures, at a value of $4,521.
 
  49,263 units of limited partnership, valued at $2,202, were presented for redemption to the DownREIT partnerships that issued such units and were acquired by the Company in exchange for an equal number of shares of the Company’s common stock.
 
  The Company deconsolidated mortgage notes payable in the aggregate amount of $24,869 upon admittance of outside investors into the Fund (as defined in Note 6, “Investments in Unconsolidated Entities”).
 
  The Company assumed fixed rate debt of $4,566 as part of the acquisition of an improved land parcel.
 
  The Company recorded a decrease to other liabilities and a corresponding gain to other comprehensive income of $2,626 to adjust the Company’s Hedging Derivatives to their fair value.
 
  Common and preferred dividends declared but not paid totaled $54,476.
 
    
During the year ended December 31, 2004:
 
    
 
  147,517 shares of common stock were issued in connection with stock grants, 78,509 shares were issued in connection with non-cash stock option exercises, 1,545 shares were issued through the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan, 75,515 shares were withheld to satisfy employees’ tax withholding and other liabilities and 3,012 shares were forfeited, for a net value of $6,138. In addition, the Company granted 465,232 options for common stock, net of forfeitures, at a value of $2,081.
 
  104,160 units of limited partnership, valued at $4,035, were presented for redemption to the DownREIT partnerships that issued such units and were acquired by the Company in exchange for an equal number of shares of the Company’s common stock.
 
  The Company sold two communities with mortgage notes payable of $28,335 in the aggregate, that were assumed by the respective buyers as part of the total sales price.
 
  The Company assumed fixed rate debt of $8,155 in connection with the acquisition of a community and $20,141 in connection with the acquisition of three improved land parcels.
 
  The Company recorded a decrease to other liabilities and a corresponding gain to other comprehensive income of $1,116 to adjust the Company’s Hedged Derivatives to their fair value.
 
  Common and preferred dividends declared but not paid totaled $52,982.

F-7


 

AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
Organization
AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (the “Company,” which term, unless the context otherwise requires, refers to AvalonBay Communities, Inc. together with its subsidiaries) is a Maryland corporation that has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (“the Code”), as amended. The Company focuses on the ownership and operation of apartment communities in high barrier-to-entry markets of the United States. These markets are located in the Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, Midwest, Pacific Northwest, and Northern and Southern California regions of the country.
At December 31, 2006, the Company owned or held a direct or indirect ownership interest in 150 operating apartment communities containing 43,141 apartment homes in ten states and the District of Columbia, of which six communities containing 2,381 apartment homes were under reconstruction. In addition, the Company owned or held a direct or indirect ownership interest in 17 communities under construction that are expected to contain an aggregate of 5,153 apartment homes when completed. The Company also owned or held a direct or indirect ownership interest in rights to develop an additional 54 communities that, if developed in the manner expected, will contain an estimated 14,185 apartment homes.
Principles of Consolidation
The Company is the surviving corporation from the merger (the “Merger”) of Bay Apartment Communities, Inc. (“Bay”) and Avalon Properties, Inc. (“Avalon”) on June 4, 1998, in which Avalon shareholders received 0.7683 of a share of common stock of the Company for each share owned of Avalon common stock. The Merger was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, with the historical financial statements for Avalon presented prior to the Merger. At that time, Avalon ceased to legally exist, and Bay as the surviving legal entity adopted the historical financial statements of Avalon. Consequently, Bay’s assets were recorded in the historical financial statements of Avalon at an amount equal to Bay’s debt outstanding at that time plus the value of capital stock retained by the Bay stockholders, which approximates fair value. In connection with the Merger, the Company changed its name from Bay Apartment Communities, Inc. to AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned partnerships, certain joint venture partnerships, subsidiary partnerships structured as DownREITs and any variable interest entities consolidated under FASB Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46(R)”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51,” as revised in December 2003. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The Company assesses consolidation of variable interest entities under the guidance of FIN 46(R). The Company accounts for joint venture entities and subsidiary partnerships, including those structured as DownREITs, that are not variable interest entities, in accordance with EITF Issue No. 04-5, “Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights”, Statement of Position (“SOP”) 78-9, “Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures”, Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 18, “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock” and EITF Topic D-46, “Accounting for Limited Partnership Investments.” The Company uses EITF Issue No. 04-5 to evaluate the partnership of each joint venture entity and determine whether control over the partnership, as defined by the EITF, lies with the general partner, or the limited partners, when the limited partners have certain rights. The general partner in a limited partnership is presumed to control that limited partnership, unless that presumption is overcome by the limited partners having either: (i) the substantive ability, either by a single limited partner or through a simple majority vote, to dissolve the limited partnership or otherwise remove the general partner without cause; or (ii) substantive participating rights. If the Company is the general partner and has control over the partnership, or if the Company’s limited partnership ownership includes the ability to dissolve the partnership, or has substantive participating rights, as discussed above, the Company consolidates the investments.

F-8


 

If the Company is not the general partner, or the Company’s partnership interest does not contain either of the above terms which overcome the presumption of control in a limited partnership residing with the general partner, the Company then looks to the guidance in SOP 78-9, APB 18 and EITF D-46 to determine the accounting framework to apply. The Company generally uses the equity method to account for these investments unless our ownership interest is so minor that we have virtually no influence over the partnership operating and financial policies. Investments in which the Company has little or no influence are accounted for using the cost method.
In each of the partnerships structured as DownREITs, either the Company or one of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries is the general partner, and there are one or more limited partners whose interest in the partnership is represented by units of limited partnership interest. For each DownREIT partnership, limited partners are entitled to receive an initial distribution before any distribution is made to the general partner. Although the partnership agreements for each of the DownREITs are different, generally the distributions per unit paid to the holders of units of limited partnership interests have approximated the Company’s current common stock dividend per share. The holders of units of limited partnership interest have the right to present all or some of their units for redemption for a cash amount as determined by the applicable partnership agreement and based on the fair value of the Company’s common stock. In lieu of cash redemption, the Company may elect to exchange such units for an equal number of shares of the company’s common stock.
In conjunction with the acquisition and development of investments in unconsolidated entities, the Company may incur costs in excess of its equity in the underlying assets. These costs are capitalized and depreciated over the life of the underlying assets to the extent that the Company expects to recover these costs.
If there is an event or change in circumstance that indicates a loss in the value of an investment, the Company’s policy is to record the loss and reduce the value of the investment to its fair value. A loss in value would be indicated if the Company could not recover the carrying value of the investment or if the investee could not sustain an earnings capacity that would justify the carrying amount of the investment. During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company recorded an impairment loss of $1,002 related to a technology investment, which is included in operating expenses, excluding property taxes on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income. The Company did not recognize an impairment loss on any of its investments in unconsolidated entities during the years ended December 31, 2006 or 2005.
Revenue and Gain Recognition
Rental income related to leases is recognized on an accrual basis when due from residents in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition,” and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 13, “Accounting for Leases.” In accordance with the Company’s standard lease terms, rental payments are generally due on a monthly basis. Any cash concessions given at the inception of the lease are amortized over the approximate life of the lease, which is generally one year.
The Company accounts for sales of real estate assets and the related gain recognition in accordance with SFAS No. 66, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate.”
Real Estate
The operating real estate assets are stated at cost and consist of land, buildings and improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment, and other costs incurred during their development, redevelopment and acquisition. Significant expenditures which improve or extend the life of an asset are capitalized. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred.
The Company’s policy with respect to capital expenditures is generally to capitalize only non-recurring expenditures. Improvements and upgrades are capitalized only if the item exceeds $15, extends the useful life of the asset and is not related to making an apartment home ready for the next resident. Purchases of personal property, such as computers and furniture, are capitalized only if the item is a new addition and exceeds $2.5. The Company generally expenses purchases of personal property made for replacement purposes.
The capitalization of costs during the development of assets (including interest and related loan fees, property taxes and other direct and indirect costs) begins when development efforts commence and ends when the asset, or a portion of an asset, is delivered and is ready for its intended use.

F-9


 

Cost capitalization during redevelopment of apartment homes (including interest and related loan fees, property taxes and other direct and indirect costs) begins when an apartment home is taken out-of-service for redevelopment and ends when the apartment home redevelopment is completed and the apartment home is available for a new resident. Rental income and operating costs incurred during the initial lease-up or post-redevelopment lease-up period are recognized as they accrue.
In accordance with SFAS No. 67, “Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects,” the Company capitalizes pre-development costs incurred in pursuit of new development opportunities for which the Company currently believes future development is probable (“Development Rights”). Future development of these Development Rights is dependent upon various factors, including zoning and regulatory approval, rental market conditions, construction costs and availability of capital. Pre-development costs incurred in the pursuit of Development Rights for which future development is not yet considered probable are expensed as incurred. In addition, if the status of a Development Right changes, making future development by the Company no longer probable, any capitalized pre-development costs are written-off with a charge to expense. The Company expenses costs related to abandoned pursuits, which includes the abandonment or impairment of Development Rights, acquisition pursuits, disposition pursuits and technology investments, in the amounts of $2,115 in 2006, $816 in 2005 and $1,726 in 2004. These costs are included in operating expenses, excluding property taxes on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income. Abandoned pursuit costs can vary greatly, and the costs incurred in any given period may be significantly different in future years.
The Company owns land improved with office buildings and industrial space occupied by unrelated third-parties in connection with five Development Rights. The Company intends to manage the current improvements until such time as all tenant obligations have been satisfied or eliminated through negotiation, and construction of new apartment communities is ready to begin. As provided under the guidance of SFAS No. 67, the revenue from incidental operations received from the current improvements in excess of any incremental costs are being recorded as a reduction of total capitalized costs of the Development Right and not as part of net income.
In connection with the acquisition of an operating community, the Company performs a valuation and allocation to each asset and liability acquired in such transaction, based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition in accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” The purchase price allocations to tangible assets, such as land, buildings and improvements, and furniture, fixtures and equipment, are reflected in real estate assets and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Any purchase price allocation to intangible assets, such as in-place leases, is included in prepaid expenses and other assets on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and amortized over the average remaining lease term of the acquired leases. The fair value of acquired in-place leases is determined based on the estimated cost to replace such leases, including foregone rents during an assumed re-lease period, as well as the impact on projected cash flow of acquired leases with leased rents above or below current market rents.
Depreciation is calculated on buildings and improvements using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which range from seven to thirty years. Furniture, fixtures and equipment are generally depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which range from three years (primarily computer-related equipment) to seven years.
It is the Company’s policy to perform a quarterly qualitative analysis to determine if there are changes in circumstances that suggest the carrying value of a long lived asset may not be recoverable. If there is an event or change in circumstance that indicates an impairment in the value of an operating community, the Company compares the current and projected operating cash flow of the community over its remaining useful life, on an undiscounted basis, to the carrying amount of the community. If the carrying amount is in excess of the estimated projected operating cash flow of the community, the Company would recognize an impairment loss equivalent to an amount required to adjust the carrying amount to its estimated fair market value. The Company has not recognized an impairment loss on any of its operating communities during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 or 2004.
Income Taxes
The Company elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code, as amended, for the year ended December 31, 1994 and has not revoked such election. A corporate REIT is a legal entity which holds real estate interests and must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it currently distribute at least 90% of its adjusted taxable income to stockholders. As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to corporate level federal income tax on taxable income if it distributes 100% of the taxable income over the time period allowed under the Code to its stockholders.

F-10


 

Management believes that all such conditions for the avoidance of income taxes have been met for the periods presented. Accordingly, no provision for federal and state income taxes has been made. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent taxable years. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property, and to federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed taxable income. In addition, taxable income from non-REIT activities managed through taxable REIT subsidiaries is subject to federal, state and local income taxes.
The following reconciles net income available to common stockholders to taxable net income for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 (unaudited):
             
  2006  2005  2004 
  Estimate  Actual  Actual 
 
            
Net income available to common stockholders
 $269,699  $313,678  $211,045 
Dividends attributable to preferred stock, not deductible for tax
  8,700   8,700   8,700 
GAAP gain on sale of communities less than tax gain
  7,326   9,345   8,305 
Depreciation/Amortization timing differences on real estate
  (24,917)  (14,736)  (3,793)
Tax compensation expense in excess of GAAP
  (20,968)  (18,969)  (19,758)
Other adjustments
  5,135   (2,254)  (9,835)
 
         
Taxable net income
 $244,975  $295,764  $194,664 
 
         
The following summarizes the tax components of the Company’s common and preferred dividends declared for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 (unaudited):
             
  2006 2005 2004
 
Ordinary income
  48%  9%  39%
15% capital gain
  43%  77%  51%
Unrecaptured §1250 gain
  9%  14%  10%
Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs include fees and other expenditures necessary to obtain debt financing and are amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the shorter of the term of the loan or the related credit enhancement facility, if applicable. Unamortized financing costs are written-off when debt is retired before the maturity date. Accumulated amortization of deferred financing costs was $16,179 at December 31, 2006 and was $16,074 at December 31, 2005.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Cash in Escrow
Cash and cash equivalents include all cash and liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less from the date acquired. Cash in escrow consists primary of construction financing proceeds that is restricted for use in the construction of a specific community. The majority of the Company’s cash, cash equivalents and cash in escrows are held at major commercial banks.
Interest Rate Contracts
The Company utilizes derivative financial instruments to manage interest rate risk and has designated these financial instruments as cash flow hedges under the guidance of SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” and SFAS No. 138, “Accounting for Certain Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities, an Amendment of Statement No. 133.” This statement requires that every derivative instrument be recorded on the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value, with changes in fair value recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met.

F-11


 

For cash flow hedge relationships, changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument that are deemed effective at offsetting the risk being hedged are reported in other comprehensive income. For cash flow hedges where the cumulative changes in the fair value of the derivative exceed the cumulative changes in fair value of the hedged item, the ineffective portion is recognized in current period earnings. As of December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the Company had approximately $262,000 and $233,000, respectively, in variable rate debt subject to cash flow hedges. See Note 5, “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” for further discussion of derivative financial instruments.
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income, as reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income, is defined as all changes in equity during each period except for those resulting from investments by or distributions to shareholders. Accumulated other comprehensive loss as reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, reflects the effective portion of the cumulative changes in the fair value of derivatives in qualifying cash flow hedge relationships.
Earnings per Common Share
In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share,” basic earnings per share is computed by dividing earnings available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Other potentially dilutive common shares, and the related impact to earnings, are considered when calculating earnings per share on a diluted basis. The Company’s earnings per common share are determined as follows:
             
  For the year ended 
  12-31-06  12-31-05  12-31-04 
Basic and diluted shares outstanding
            
Weighted average common shares — basic
  74,125,795   72,952,492   71,564,202 
Weighted average DownREIT units outstanding
  172,255   474,440   573,529 
Effect of dilutive securities
  1,288,848   1,332,386   1,217,225 
 
         
Weighted average common shares — diluted
  75,586,898   74,759,318   73,354,956 
 
         
Calculation of Earnings per Share — basic
            
Net income available to common stockholders
 $269,699  $313,678  $211,045 
 
         
Weighted average common shares — basic
  74,125,795   72,952,492   71,564,202 
 
         
Earnings per common share — basic
 $3.64  $4.30  $2.95 
 
         
Calculation of Earnings per Share — diluted
            
Net income available to common stockholders
 $269,699  $313,678  $211,045 
Add: Minority interest of DownREIT unitholders
            
in consolidated partnerships, including discontinued operations
  391   1,363   3,048 
 
         
Adjusted net income available to common stockholders
 $270,090  $315,041  $214,093 
 
         
Weighted average common shares — diluted
  75,586,898   74,759,318   73,354,956 
 
         
Earnings per common share — diluted
 $3.57  $4.21  $2.92 
 
         
Certain options to purchase shares of common stock in the amounts of 3,000 were outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2006, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because in applying the treasury stock method under the provisions of SFAS 123(R), as discussed below, such options are anti-dilutive. Employee options to purchase shares of common stock of 4,500 and 6,000 were outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares for the period and therefore, are anti-dilutive.

F-12


 

Stock-Based Compensation
Effective January 1, 2003, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” as amended by SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123,” prospectively to all employee awards granted, modified, or settled on or after January 1, 2003. Awards under the Company’s stock option plans vest over a three-year period. Therefore, the cost related to stock-based employee compensation for employee stock options included in the determination of net income for the year ended 2006 is the same as the cost that would have been recognized if the fair value based method had been applied to all awards since the original effective date of SFAS No. 123. However, the cost related to stock-based employee compensation for employee stock options included in the determination of net income for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 is less than that which would have been recognized if the fair value based method had been applied to all awards granted since the original effective date of SFAS 123. If the fair value based method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards in the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, net income would have been $112 and $967 lower for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. There would not have been any material impact on earnings per common share – diluted for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004.
The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 123(R), “Share Based Payment,” using the modified prospective transition method on January 1, 2006. The adoption of SFAS 123(R) did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. However, the adoption of SFAS 123(R) changed the service period for, and timing of, the recognition of compensation cost related to retirement eligibility, which will generally result in accelerated expense recognition by the Company for its stock based compensation programs. For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company recorded compensation cost over the vesting period, regardless of eligibility for retirement (see Note 8, “Commitments and Contingencies,” for a discussion of the Company’s retirement plan). If the Company had recorded compensation cost based on retirement eligibility, the increase to compensation cost during the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 would not have been material.
Under the provisions of SFAS 123(R), the Company is required to estimate the forfeiture of stock options and recognize compensation cost net of the estimated forfeitures. The estimated forfeitures included in compensation cost are adjusted to reflect actual forfeitures at the end of the vesting period. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), option forfeitures were recognized as they occurred. The forfeiture rate at December 31, 2006 was 1.9%. The application of estimated forfeitures did not materially impact compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Variable Interest Entities under FIN 46(R)
The Company adopted the final provisions of FIN 46(R) as of January 1, 2004, which resulted in the consolidation of one entity during 2004 from which the Company held a participating mortgage note. As a result, the Company recognized a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle in January 2004 in the amount of $4,547, which increased earnings per common share – diluted by $0.06. The Company did not hold an equity interest in this entity, and therefore 100% of the entity’s net income or loss was recognized by the Company as minority interest in consolidated partnerships on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income. In October 2004, the Company received payment in full of the outstanding mortgage note. Upon note repayment, the Company did not continue to hold a variable interest in this entity and therefore the Company discontinued consolidating the entity under the provisions of FIN 46(R). Related interest income in the year ended December 31, 2004 has been eliminated in consolidation.

F-13


 

Assets Held for Sale & Discontinued Operations
The Company follows SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS 144”) which requires that the assets and liabilities of any communities which have been sold, or otherwise qualify as held for sale, be presented separately in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. In addition, the results of operations for those assets that meet the definition of discontinued operations are presented as such in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income. Held for sale and discontinued operations classifications are provided in both the current and prior years presented. Real estate assets held for sale are measured at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less the cost to sell. Both the real estate assets and corresponding liabilities are presented separately in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Subsequent to classification of a community as held for sale, no further depreciation is recorded. For those assets qualifying for classification as discontinued operations, the community specific components of net income presented as discontinued operations include net operating income, minority interest expense and interest expense, net. For periods prior to the asset qualifying for discontinued operations under SFAS 144, the Company reclassified the results of operations to discontinued operations in accordance with SFAS 144. Subsequent to the reclassification to discontinued operations, the impact of assets classified as discontinued operations on the statements of operations and other comprehensive income will include depreciation. In addition, the net gain or loss (including any impairment loss) on the eventual disposal of communities held for sale will be presented as discontinued operations when recognized. A change in presentation for held for sale or discontinued operations will not have any impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. The Company combines the operating, investing and financing portions of cash flows attributable to discontinued operations with the respective cash flows from continuing operations on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,” (“FIN 48”) which provides guidance for the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN 48 establishes a threshold for the recognition and measurement in financial statements of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 is effective for all fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is still assessing the impact and disclosure requirements of FIN 48.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” which standardizes the definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, and accordingly, this statement does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for all fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company does not believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have any material impact on its financial position or results of operations.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to amounts in prior years’ financial statements to conform to current year presentations.

F-14


 

2. Interest Capitalized
The Company capitalized interest during the development and redevelopment of real estate assets in accordance with SFAS No. 34, “Capitalization of Interest Cost.” Capitalized interest associated with communities under development or redevelopment totaled $46,388 for 2006, $25,284 for 2005 and $20,566 for 2004.
3. Notes Payable, Unsecured Notes and Credit Facility
The Company’s mortgage notes payable, unsecured notes and variable rate unsecured credit facility as of December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 are summarized below. The following amounts and discussion do not include the construction loan payable related to a community classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2006 (see Note 7, “Real Estate Disposition Activities”).
         
  12-31-06  12-31-05 
Fixed rate unsecured notes (1)
 $2,153,078  $1,809,182 
Fixed rate mortgage notes payable — conventional and tax-exempt
  234,272   239,025 
Variable rate mortgage notes payable — conventional and tax-exempt
  438,236   219,010 
 
      
Total notes payable and unsecured notes
  2,825,586   2,267,217 
Variable rate unsecured credit facility
     66,800 
 
      
Total mortgage notes payable, unsecured notes and unsecured credit facility
 $2,825,586  $2,334,017 
 
      
(1) Balances at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 include $2,922 and $818 of debt discount, respectively.
The following debt activity occurred during the year ended December 31, 2006:
  The Company issued $34,000 of variable rate mortgage debt maturing in March 2011;
  The Company issued $93,800 of variable rate tax-exempt debt maturing in November 2037;
  The Company issued $48,500 of variable rate tax-exempt debt maturing in November 2039;
  The Company issued $45,000 of variable rate tax-exempt debt maturing in July 2040;
  The Company repaid $150,000 of unsecured notes with an annual interest rate of 6.8%, pursuant to their scheduled maturity; and
  The Company issued a total of $500,000 of unsecured notes a shelf registration statement. The offering consisted of two separate tranches in the aggregate principal amount of $250,000 each, with effective interest rates of 5.586% and 5.820%, maturing in January 2012 and September 2016, respectively.
In the aggregate, secured notes payable mature at various dates from October 2008 through April 2043 and are secured by certain apartment communities and improved land parcels (with a net carrying value of $954,612 as of December 31, 2006). As of December 31, 2006, the Company has guaranteed approximately $67,395 of mortgage notes payable held by wholly-owned subsidiaries; all such mortgage notes payable are consolidated for financial reporting purposes. The weighted average interest rate of the Company’s fixed rate mortgage notes payable (conventional and tax-exempt) was 6.8% at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005. The weighted average interest rate of the Company’s variable rate mortgage notes payable and its unsecured credit facility (as discussed on the following page), including the effect of certain financing related fees, was 5.8% at December 31, 2006 and 5.5% at December 31, 2005.

F-15


 

Scheduled payments and maturities of mortgage notes payable and unsecured notes outstanding at December 31, 2006 are as follows:
                 
          Unsecured  Stated 
  Secured notes  Secured notes  notes  interest rate of 
Year payments  maturities  maturities  unsecured notes 
2007
 $8,521  $  $110,000   6.875%
 
          150,000   5.000%
2008
  8,718   4,368   50,000   6.625%
 
          146,000   8.250%
2009
  7,831   73,793   150,000   7.500%
2010
  6,354   28,989   200,000   7.500%
2011
  5,303   35,910   300,000   6.625%
 
          50,000   6.625%
2012
  4,601   12,166   250,000   6.125%
 
          250,000   5.500%
2013
  4,728      100,000   4.950%
2014
  3,748   34,450   150,000   5.375%
2015
  5,499          
2016
  5,926      250,000   5.750%
Thereafter
  144,364   277,239       
 
             
 
 $205,593  $466,915  $2,156,000     
 
             
The Company’s unsecured notes contain a number of financial and other covenants with which the Company must comply, including, but not limited to, limits on the aggregate amount of total and secured indebtedness the Company may have on a consolidated basis and limits on the Company’s required debt service payments.
The Company has entered into a $650,000 revolving variable rate unsecured credit facility with a syndicate of commercial banks. JPMorgan Chase Bank, Wachovia Bank, N.A. and Bank of America, N.A. led the syndication effort in varying capacities. There were no amounts outstanding under the current facility and $38,713 outstanding in letters of credit on December 31, 2006. The Company had $66,800 outstanding under the prior credit facility and $40,154 in letters of credit on December 31, 2005. Under the terms of the credit facility, the Company may elect to increase the facility up to $1,000,000, provided that one or more banks (from the syndicate or otherwise) voluntarily agree to provide the additional commitment. No member of the syndicate of banks can prohibit such increase; such an increase in the facility will only be effective to the extent banks (from the syndicate or otherwise) choose to commit to lend additional funds. The Company pays participating banks, in the aggregate, an annual facility fee of approximately $813, which is subject to increase in the event that the amount available on the facility is increased. The unsecured credit facility bears interest at varying levels based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), rating levels achieved on the Company’s unsecured notes and on a maturity schedule selected by the Company. The current stated pricing is LIBOR plus 0.40% per annum. The stated spread over LIBOR can vary from LIBOR plus 0.325% to LIBOR plus 1.00% based on credit conditions. In addition, the unsecured credit facility includes a competitive bid option, which allows banks that are part of the lender consortium to bid to make loans to the Company at a rate that is lower than the stated rate provided by the unsecured credit facility for up to $422,500. The competitive bid option may result in lower pricing than the stated rate if market conditions allow. The Company had no amounts outstanding under this competitive bid option as of December 31, 2006. The Company is subject to certain customary covenants under the unsecured credit facility, including, but not limited to, maintaining certain maximum leverage ratios, a minimum fixed charges coverage ratio and minimum unencumbered assets and equity levels. The credit facility matures in November 2011, assuming exercise of a one-year renewal option by the Company.

F-16


 

4. Stockholders’ Equity
As of both December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company had authorized for issuance 140,000,000 and 50,000,000 shares of common and preferred stock, respectively. As of December 31, 2006, the Company has the following series of redeemable preferred stock outstanding at a stated value of $100,000. This series has no stated maturity and is not subject to any sinking fund or mandatory redemptions.
                 
  Shares outstanding Payable Annual Liquidation Non-redeemable
Series December 31, 2006 quarterly rate preference prior to
 
H
  4,000,000  March, June, September, December  8.70% $25.00  October 15, 2008
Dividends on the preferred stock are cumulative from the date of original issue and are payable quarterly in arrears on or before the 15th day of each month as stated in the table above. The preferred stock is not redeemable prior to the date stated in the table above, but on or after the stated date, may be redeemed for cash at the option of the Company in whole or in part at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus all accrued and unpaid dividends, if any.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company:
 (i) issued 614,692 shares of common stock in connection with stock options exercised;
 (ii) issued 308,345 shares of common stock to acquire an equal number of DownREIT limited partnership units;
 (iii) issued 2,306 shares through the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan;
 (iv) issued 122,172 common shares in connection with stock grants;
 (v) issued 10,830 shares of common stock in connection with its employee stock purchase plan;
 (vi) had 5,910 shares of restricted stock forfeited; and
 (vii) withheld 47,111 shares to satisfy employees’ tax withholding and other liabilities.
In addition, the Company granted 867,113 options for common stock to employees. As required under SFAS No. 123(R), any deferred compensation related to the Company’s stock option and restricted stock grants during the year ended December 31, 2006 is not reflected on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2006 or on the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, and will not be reflected until earned as compensation cost.
Dividends per common share were $3.12 for the year ended December 31, 2006, $2.84 for year ended December 31, 2005, and $2.80 for the year ended December 31, 2004. The average dividend for all non-redeemed preferred shares during 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $2.18 per share. No preferred shares were redeemed in 2006, 2005 or 2004.
In 2004, the Company resumed its Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (the “DRIP”). The DRIP allows for holders of the Company’s common stock or preferred stock to purchase shares of common stock through either reinvested dividends or optional cash payments. The purchase price per share for newly issued shares of common stock under the DRIP will be equal to the last reported sale price for a share of the Company’s common stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) on the applicable investment date.

F-17


 

5. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company enters into interest rate swap and interest rate cap agreements (collectively, the “Hedging Derivatives”) to reduce the impact of interest rate fluctuations on its variable rate, tax-exempt bonds and its variable rate conventional secured debt (collectively, the “Hedged Debt”). The Company has not entered into any interest rate hedge agreements for its conventional unsecured debt and does not enter into derivative transactions for trading or other speculative purposes. The following table summarizes the consolidated Hedging Derivatives at December 31, 2006 (dollars in thousands):
         
  Interest Interest
  Rate Caps Rate Swaps
Notional balance
 $196,500  $65,759 
Weighted average interest rate (1)
  5.7%  6.3%
Weighted average capped interest rate
  7.7%  n/a 
Earliest maturity date
 Mar-07  Aug-07 
Latest maturity date
 Apr-11 Jul-10
Estimated liability fair value
 $(78) $(3,084)
(1) For interest rate caps, this represents the weighted average interest rate on the debt.
The Company has determined that its Hedging Derivatives qualify as effective cash flow hedges under SFAS No. 133, resulting in the Company recording the effective portion of cumulative changes in the fair value of the Hedging Derivatives in other comprehensive income. Amounts recorded in other comprehensive income will be reclassified into earnings in the periods in which earnings are affected by the hedged cash flow. To adjust the Hedging Derivatives to their fair value, the Company recorded unrealized gains in other comprehensive income of $891, $2,626 and $1,116 during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. These amounts will be reclassified into earnings in conjunction with the periodic adjustment of the floating rates on the Hedged Debt, in interest expense, net. The amount reclassified into earnings in 2006, as well as the estimated amount included in accumulated other comprehensive income as of December 31, 2006, expected to be reclassified into earnings within the next twelve months to offset the variability of cash flows of the hedged items during this period are not material.
The Company assesses both at inception and on an on-going basis, the effectiveness of qualifying cash flow hedges. Hedge ineffectiveness, reported as a component of General and Administrative expenses, did not have a material impact on earnings of the Company for any prior period, and the Company does not anticipate that it will have a material effect in the future. The fair values of the Hedging Derivatives are included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Derivative financial instruments expose the Company to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties under the terms of the Hedging Derivatives. The Company minimizes its credit risk on these transactions by dealing with major, creditworthy financial institutions which have an A+ or better credit rating by the Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group. As part of its on-going control procedures, the Company monitors the credit ratings of counterparties and the exposure of the Company to any single entity, thus minimizing credit risk concentration. The Company believes the likelihood of realizing losses from counterparty non-performance is remote.
6. Investments in Unconsolidated Entities
Investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Entities
The Company accounts for its investments in unconsolidated real estate entities that are not considered variable interest entities under FIN 46(R) in accordance with EITF Issue No. 04-5, SOP 78-9 and APB 18, and EITF Topic D-46.
During 2006, the Company engaged in the following transactions impacting our investments in unconsolidated real estate entities.
  Town Run Associates — In the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company purchased its partner’s interest in Avalon Run for $58,500. Town Run Associates was formed as a general partnership in November 1994 to develop, own and operate Avalon Run, a 426 apartment-home community located in Lawrenceville, New Jersey. Avalon Run is currently a wholly-owned community and has since been consolidated for financial reporting purposes.

F-18


 

  Avalon Terrace, LLC — In December 2006, the Company and its joint venture partner sold Avalon Bedford to an unrelated third party for a sales price of $79,100. The Company’s share of the gain calculated in accordance with GAAP was $6,609 and is included in equity income of unconsolidated entities on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income. The Company acquired Avalon Bedford, a 368 apartment-home community located in Stamford, Connecticut in December 1998. In May 2000, the Company transferred Avalon Bedford to Avalon Terrace, LLC and subsequently admitted a joint venture partner, while retaining a 25% ownership interest in this limited liability company for an investment of $5,394 and a right to 50% of cash flow distributions after achievement of a threshold return.
As of December 31, 2006, the Company had investments in the following real estate entities:
  Town Grove, LLC — The limited liability corporation was formed in December 1997 to develop, own and operate Avalon Grove, a 402 apartment-home community located in Stamford, Connecticut. Since formation of this venture, the Company has invested $12,600, and following a preferred return on all contributed equity (which was achieved in 2006), has a 50% ownership and a 50% cash flow and residual economic interest. The Company is responsible for the day-to-day operations of the Avalon Grove community and is the management agent subject to the terms of a management agreement. The development of Avalon Grove was funded through contributions from the Company and the other venture partner, and therefore Avalon Grove is not subject to any outstanding debt as of December 31, 2006. This community is unconsolidated for financial reporting purposes and is accounted for under the equity method.
 
  Arna Valley View LP — In connection with the municipal approval process for the development of a consolidated community, the Company agreed to participate in the formation of a limited partnership in February 1999 to develop, finance, own and operate Arna Valley View, a 101 apartment-home community located in Arlington, Virginia. This community has affordable rents for 100% of apartment homes related to the tax-exempt bond financing and tax credits used to finance construction of the community. A subsidiary of the Company is the general partner of the partnership with a 0.01% ownership interest. The Company is responsible for the day-to-day operations of the community and is the management agent subject to the terms of a management agreement. As of December 31, 2006, Arna Valley View has $5,793 of variable rate, tax-exempt bonds outstanding, which mature in June 2032. In addition, Arna Valley View has $4,834 of 4% fixed rate county bonds outstanding that mature in December 2030. Arna Valley View’s debt is neither guaranteed by, nor recoursed to the Company. Due to the Company’s limited ownership in this venture and the terms of the management agreement regarding the rights of the limited partners, it is accounted for using the cost method.
 
  CVP I, LLC – In February 2004, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement with an unrelated third-party for the development of Avalon Chrystie Place, a 361 apartment-home community located in New York, New York, for which construction was completed in late 2005. The Company has contributed $6,270 to this joint venture and holds a 20% equity interest (with a right to 50% of distributions after achievement of a threshold return, which was not achieved in 2006). The Company is the managing member of CVP I, LLC, however property management services at the community are performed by an unrelated third party. In connection with the construction management services that the Company provided to CVP I, LLC during the development of Avalon Chrystie Place, the Company provided a construction completion guarantee to the construction loan lender in order to fulfill their standard financing requirements related to the construction financing. Upon completion of the construction of Avalon Chrystie Place in 2006, the Company was released from all obligations associated with this guarantee.
 
   As of December 31, 2006, CVP I, LLC has tax-exempt variable rate bonds in the amount of $117,000 outstanding, which have a permanent credit enhancement and mature in February 2036. The Company has guaranteed, under limited circumstance, the repayment to the credit enhancer of any advance in fulfillment of CVP I, LLC’s repayment obligations under the bonds. The Company has also guaranteed the credit enhancer that CVP I, LLC will obtain a final certificate of occupancy for the project overall once tenant improvements related to a retail tenant are complete, which is expected in 2007.

F-19


 

   The Company’s 80% partner in this venture has agreed that it will reimburse us its pro rata share of any amounts paid relative to these guaranteed obligations. The Company does not currently expect to incur any liability under either of these guarantees. The estimated fair value of, and the Company’s obligation under these guarantees, both at inception and as of December 31, 2006 were not significant. As a result, the Company has not recorded any obligation associated with these guarantees at December 31, 2006. This community is unconsolidated for financial reporting purposes and is accounted for under the equity method.
 
  Avalon Del Rey Apartments, LLC - In March 2004, the Company entered into an agreement with an unrelated third party which provided that, upon construction completion, Avalon Del Rey would be owned and operated by a joint venture between the Company and the third party. Avalon Del Rey is a 309 apartment-home community located in Los Angeles, California. Construction for Avalon Del Rey was completed during the third quarter of 2006. During the fourth quarter of 2006, the third-party venture partner invested $49,000 and was granted a 70% ownership interest in the venture, with the Company retaining a 30% equity interest (see Note 7, “Real Estate Disposition Activities”). The Company will continue to be responsible for the day-to-day operations of the community and will be the management agent subject to the terms of a management agreement. Avalon Del Rey Apartments, LLC has a variable rate $50,000 secured construction loan, of which $40,845 is outstanding as of December 31, 2006 and which matures in September 2007. In conjunction with the construction management services that the Company provided to Avalon Del Rey Apartments, LLC, the Company has provided a construction completion guarantee to the construction loan lender in order to fulfill their standard financing requirements related to construction financing. The obligation of the Company under this guarantee will terminate following satisfaction of the lender’s standard completion requirements, which the Company expects to occur in 2007.
 
   In conjunction with the admittance of the joint venture partner to the LLC, the Company provided the third-party investor an operating guarantee. This guarantee, which extends for one year, provides that if the one-year return for the initial year of the joint venture partner’s investment is less than a threshold return of 7% on its initial equity investment, that the Company will pay the joint venture partner an amount equal to the shortfall, up to the 7% threshold return required. The maximum exposure of this guarantee is approximately $3,400. As of December 31, 2006, the cash flows and return on investment for Avalon Del Rey are expected to meet and exceed the initial year threshold return required by our joint venture partner. As a result, the Company’s obligation under this guarantee is insignificant, and the Company has therefore not recorded any liability associated with this guarantee as of December 31, 2006.
 
   The sale of the 70% ownership interest is being accounted for under the deposit method of accounting pursuant to SFAS 66, with the recognition of the sale deferred until the Company is relieved of its obligation under the operating guarantee. Accordingly, the Company continues to consolidate this community for financial reporting purposes, reporting the joint venture partner’s interest in the net assets of the LLC as a component of accrued expenses and other liabilities, and recognizing the joint venture partner’s interest in the operating results of the LLC as a component of minority interest in consolidated partnerships.
 
  Juanita Construction, Inc. - In April 2004, a taxable REIT subsidiary of the Company entered into an agreement to develop Avalon at Juanita Village, a 211 apartment-home community located in Kirkland, Washington, for which construction was completed in late 2005. Avalon at Juanita Village was developed through Juanita Construction, Inc., a wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiary and was sold to a joint venture in the first quarter of 2006, at which point, the subsidiary was reimbursed for all the costs of construction and retained a promoted residual interest in the profits of the joint venture. The third party joint venture partner received a 100% equity interest in the joint venture and will control the joint venture. The Company was engaged to manage the community for a property management fee. This community is unconsolidated for financial reporting purposes effective with the sale to the joint venture.
 
  MVP I, LLC – In December 2004, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement with an unrelated third party for the development of Avalon at Mission Bay North II. Construction for Avalon at Mission Bay North II, a 313 apartment-home community located in San Francisco, California, was completed in December 2006. The Company has contributed $5,902 to this venture and holds a 25% equity interest. The Company will be responsible for the day-to-day operations of the community and will be the management agent subject to the terms of a management agreement.

F-20


 

   MVP I, LLC has a variable rate $94,400 secured construction loan, of which $76,739 is outstanding as of December 31, 2006 and which matures in September 2010, assuming exercise of two one-year extensions. In conjunction with the construction management services that the Company provided to MVP I, LLC, the Company has provided a construction completion guarantee to the construction loan lender in order to fulfill their standard financing requirements related to construction financing. Under the terms of the guarantee, in the event of default, the Company would be required to make payment for any excess cost to complete construction over remaining unused loan proceeds. The obligation of the Company under this guarantee will terminate once all of the lender’s standard completion requirements have been satisfied, which the Company expects to occur in 2007. The estimated fair value of, and the Company’s obligation under this guarantee, both at inception and as of December 31, 2006 was not significant and therefore no liability for this guarantee has been recorded by the Company at December 31, 2006. This community is unconsolidated for financial reporting purposes and is accounted for under the equity method.
 
  AvalonBay Value Added Fund, L.P. (the “Fund”) – In March 2005, the Company admitted outside investors into the Fund, a private, discretionary investment vehicle, which will acquire and operate communities in the Company’s markets. The Fund will serve, until March 16, 2008 or until 80% of its committed capital is invested, as the principal vehicle through which the Company will acquire apartment communities, subject to certain exceptions. The Fund has nine institutional investors, including the Company, and a combined equity capital commitment of $330,000. A significant portion of the investments made in the Fund by its investors are being made through AvalonBay Value Added Fund, Inc., a Maryland corporation that qualifies as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code (the “Fund REIT”). A wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company is the general partner of the Fund and has committed $50,000 to the Fund and the Fund REIT, representing a 15.2% combined general partner and limited partner equity interest, with $22,944 of this commitment funded as of December 31, 2006. Under the Fund documents, the Fund has the ability to employ leverage of up to 65% on a portfolio basis, which, if achieved, would enable the Fund to invest up to approximately $940,000. Upon the admittance of the outside investors, the Fund held four communities, containing a total of 879 apartment homes with an aggregate gross real estate value of $112,852, that were acquired in 2004. Prior to the admittance of outside investors, the Fund was directly or indirectly wholly-owned by the Company, and therefore the revenues and expenses, and assets and liabilities of these four communities were consolidated in the Company’s results of operations and financial position. However, upon admittance of the outside investors in March 2005, the Company deconsolidated the revenue and expenses, and assets and liabilities of these four communities and accounts for its 15.2% equity interest in the Fund under the equity method of accounting. The Company received net proceeds of $87,948 as reimbursement for acquiring and warehousing these communities. The Company receives asset management fees, property management fees and redevelopment fees, as well as a promoted interest if certain thresholds are met (which were not achieved in 2006).
 
   As of December 31, 2006, the Fund owns the following 13 communities, subject to certain mortgage debt. In addition, as of December 31, 2006, the Fund has $57,400 outstanding under its variable rate credit facility, which matures in January 2008. The Company has not guaranteed any of the Fund debt, nor does it have any obligation to fund this debt should the Fund be unable to do so.
  Avalon at Redondo Beach, a 105 apartment-home community located in Los Angeles, California. As of December 31, 2006, Avalon at Redondo Beach has $16,765 in 4.8% fixed rate debt outstanding, which matures in October 2011;
 
  Avalon Lakeside, a 204 apartment-home community located in Chicago, Illinois. As of December 31, 2006, Avalon Lakeside has no debt outstanding;
 
  Avalon Columbia, a 170 apartment-home community located in Baltimore, Maryland. As of December 31, 2006, Avalon Columbia has $16,575 in 5.3% fixed rate debt outstanding, which matures in April 2012;
 
  Avalon Redmond, a 400 apartment-home community located in Seattle, Washington. As of December 31, 2006, Avalon Redmond has $31,500 in 5.0% fixed rate debt outstanding, which matures in July 2012;
 
  Avalon at Poplar Creek, a 196 apartment-home community located in Chicago, Illinois. As of December 31, 2006, Avalon at Poplar Creek has $16,500 in 4.8% fixed rate debt outstanding, which matures in October 2012;
 
  Fuller Martel, an 82 apartment-home community located in Los Angeles, California. As of December 31, 2006, Fuller Martel has $11,500 in 5.4% fixed rate debt outstanding, which matures in February 2014;

F-21


 

  Civic Center Place, a 192 apartment-home community located in Norwalk, California. As of December 31, 2006, Civic Center Place has $23,806 in 5.3% fixed rate debt outstanding, which matures in August 2013;
 
  Paseo Park, a 134 apartment-home community located in Fremont, California. As of December 31, 2006, Paseo Park has $11,800 in 5.7% fixed rate debt outstanding, which matures in November 2013;
 
  Aurora at Yerba Buena, a 160 apartment-home community located in San Francisco, California. As of December 31, 2006, Aurora at Yerba Buena has $41,500 in 5.9% fixed rate debt outstanding, which matures in March 2014;
 
  Avalon at Aberdeen Station, a 290 apartment-home community located in Aberdeen, New Jersey. As of December 31, 2006, Avalon at Aberdeen Station has $34,456 in 5.7% fixed rate debt outstanding, which matures in September 2013;
 
  The Springs, a 320 apartment-home community located in Corona, California. As of December 31, 2006, The Springs has $26,000 in 6.1% fixed rate debt outstanding, which matures in October 2014;
 
  The Covington, a 256 apartment-home community located in Lombard, Illinois. As of December 31, 2006, The Covington has $17,243 in 5.4% fixed rate debt outstanding, which matures in January 2014; and
 
  Cedar Valley, a 156 apartment-home community located in Columbia, Maryland. As of December 31, 2006, Cedar Valley has $12,000 in 6.3% variable rate debt outstanding, which matures in February 2007.
In addition, as part of the formation of the Fund, the Company has provided to one of the limited partners a guarantee. The guarantee provides that, if, upon final liquidation of the Fund, the total amount of all distributions to that partner during the life of the Fund (whether from operating cash flow or property sales) does not equal the total capital contributions made by that partner, then the Company will pay the partner an amount equal to the shortfall, but in no event more than 10% of the total capital contributions made by the partner (maximum of approximately $3,400 as of December 31, 2006). As of December 31, 2006, the fair value of the real estate assets owned by the Fund is considered adequate to cover such potential payment under a liquidation scenario. The estimated fair value of, and the Company’s obligation under this guarantee, both at inception and as of December 31, 2006 was not significant and therefore the Company has not recorded any obligation for this guarantee as of December 31, 2006.

F-22


 

The following is a combined summary of the financial position of the entities accounted for using the equity method, as of the dates presented:
         
  12-31-06  12-31-05 
Assets:
        
Real estate, net
 $707,227  $520,556 
Other assets
  55,716   40,485 
 
      
Total assets
 $762,943  $561,041 
 
      
Liabilities and partners’ capital:
        
Mortgage notes payable and credit facility
 $510,784  $332,760 
Other liabilities
  33,505   26,745 
Partners’ capital
  218,654   201,536 
 
      
Total liabilities and partners’ capital
 $762,943  $561,041 
 
      
The following is a combined summary of the operating results of the entities accounted for using the equity method, for the years presented:
             
  For the year ended 
  12-31-06  12-31-05  12-31-04 
Rental income
 $67,207  $35,826  $21,148 
Operating and other expenses
  (31,281)  (19,582)  (8,291)
Gain on Sale of Communities26,661
Interest expense, net
  (23,142)  (7,648)  (1,786)
Depreciation expense
  (18,054)  (8,482)  (4,003)
 
         
Net income
 $21,391  $114  $7,068 
 
         
In March 2005, the Company purchased its joint venture partner’s 75% interest in AvalonBay Redevelopment, LLC, the limited liability company that owns Avalon on the Sound, which was developed through the joint venture in 2001. Prior to December 31, 2004, the Company had a repurchase option for Avalon on the Sound and accounted for its investment as a profit-sharing arrangement as required by SFAS No. 66, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate.” The income allocated to the controlling partner is shown as venture partner interest in profit-sharing on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income for the year ended December 31, 2004. The repurchase option expired in December 2004, and therefore as of December 31, 2004 and for the three months ended March 31, 2005, the Company accounted for its 25% interest in Avalon on the Sound under the equity method of accounting. Due to the purchase of the remaining 75% equity interest, this entity was consolidated as of April 1, 2005.
In conjunction with the acquisition and development of the investments in unconsolidated entities, the Company incurred costs in excess of its equity in the underlying net assets of the respective investments. These costs represent $7,491 at December 31, 2006 and $8,806 at December 31, 2005 of the respective investment balances.

F-23


 

Investments in Unconsolidated Non-Real Estate Entities
In February 2005, the Company sold its interest in a technology venture that was accounted for under the cost method. As a result of this transaction, the Company received net proceeds of approximately $6,700 and recognized a gain on the sale of this investment of $6,252, which is reflected in equity in income of unconsolidated entities on the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income for the year ended December 31, 2005. Under the terms of the sale, certain proceeds were escrowed to secure the purchaser’s rights to indemnification. Any amounts not used for this purpose were distributed to the former investors in the venture in 2006. For the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company recognized $433 for the final installment of the gain on this sale upon release of this escrow.
The following is a summary of the Company’s equity in income of unconsolidated entities for the years presented:
             
  For the year ended 
  12-31-06  12-31-05  12-31-04 
Town Grove, LLC
 $1,457  $1,286  $950 
CVP I, LLC
  (68)  (339)   
Town Run Associates
  298   266   43 
Avalon Terrace, LLC
  6,736   58   (28)
MVP I, LLC
  (662)  (57)   
AvalonBay Value Added Fund, L.P.
  (799)  (341)   
AvalonBay Redevelopment, LLC
     73    
Rent.com
  433   6,252   135 
Constellation Real Technologies
  60       
Total
 $7,455  $7,198  $1,100 
7. Real Estate Disposition Activities
During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company sold four communities, containing a total of 1,036 apartment homes, including one community that was previously held by a joint venture entity (see Note 6, “Investments in Unconsolidated Entities”). These communities were sold for a gross sales price of approximately $261,850, resulting in net proceeds of $218,492 and a GAAP gain of $104,020. Details regarding the community asset sales are summarized in the following table:
                     
    Period Apartment      Gross sales  Net 
Community Name Location of sale homes  Debt  price  proceeds 
Avalon Estates
 Boston, MA Q106  162      34,550   33,563 
Avalon Cupertino
 San Jose, CA Q106  311      88,000   86,602 
Avalon Corners
 Stamford, CT Q206  195      60,200   58,248 
Avalon Bedford (1)
 Stamford, CT Q406  368   37,200   79,100   40,079 
 
                
Total of all 2006 asset sales
      1,036  $37,200  $261,850  $218,492 
 
                
Total of all 2005 asset sales
      1,305  $  $351,450  $344,185 
 
                
Total of all 2004 asset sales
      1,360  $38,735  $241,050  $210,001 
 
                
(1) The Company held a 25% ownership interest and right to 50% of cash flow distributions after achievement of a threshold return for this community
As of December 31, 2006, the Company had one community, Avalon Del Rey, that qualified as held for sale under the provisions of SFAS No. 144. In 2006, the Company admitted a third-party partner into the joint venture entity that owns Avalon Del Rey (see Note 6, “Investments in Unconsolidated Entities”). However, due to the operating guarantee provided to the joint venture partner, the Company will account for its investment under the deposit method as required by SFAS No. 66, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate.” As a result, the Company has classified the real estate assets (which are net of an impairment charge taken on the land in 2002, as well as accumulated depreciation recorded through December 31, 2006) and the related liabilities for Avalon Del Rey as held for sale, as separate captions in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. However, due to the continuing involvement of the Company through its 30% ownership interest and its role as the managing member in the venture, Avalon Del Rey has been and will continue to be reported as a component of continuing operations on the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-24


 

Also, in accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 144, the operations for any communities sold from January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2006 have been presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements. Accordingly, certain reclassifications have been made in prior periods to reflect discontinued operations consistent with current period presentation.
The following is a summary of income from discontinued operations for the periods presented:
             
  For the year ended 
  12-31-06  12-31-05  12-31-04 
Rental income
 $1,787  $26,867  $48,018 
Operating and other expenses
  (639)  (8,684)  (15,646)
Interest expense, net
        (525)
Minority interest expense
        (37)
Depreciation expense
     (3,241)  (10,676)
 
         
Income from discontinued operations
 $1,148  $14,942  $21,134 
 
         
The Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets include other assets (excluding net real estate) of $1,558 and $1,599, and other liabilities of $42,985 and $38,352 as of December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, relating to real estate assets sold or held for sale.
The Company sold three parcels of land, one located in Jersey City, New Jersey, one in Danvers, Massachusetts, and one in Bedford, Massachusetts, for an aggregate gross sales price of $19,635 and an aggregate GAAP gain of $13,519. The Company had gains on the Sales of land parcels of $4,479 in 2005, and $1,138 in 2004.
8. Commitments and Contingencies
Employment Agreements and Arrangements
As of December 31, 2006, the Company had employment agreements with four executive officers. The employment agreements provide for severance payments and generally provide for accelerated vesting of stock options and restricted stock in the event of a termination of employment (except for a termination by the Company with cause or a voluntary termination by the employee). The current terms of these agreements end on dates that vary between December 2007 and November 2008. The employment agreements provide for one-year automatic renewals (two years in the case of the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”)) after the initial term unless an advance notice of non-renewal is provided by either party. Upon a notice of non-renewal by the Company, each of the officers may terminate his employment and receive a severance payment.

F-25


 

Upon a change in control, the agreements provide for an automatic extension of up to three years from the date of the change in control. The employment agreements provide for base salary and incentive compensation in the form of cash awards, stock options and stock grants subject to the discretion of, and attainment of performance goals established by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.
The Company’s stock incentive plan, as described in Note 10, “Stock-Based Compensation Plans,” provides that upon an employee’s Retirement (as defined in the plan documents) from the Company, all outstanding stock options and restricted shares of stock held by the employee will vest, and the employee will have up to 12 months to exercise any options held upon retirement. Under the plan, Retirement means a termination of employment, other than for cause, after attainment of age 50, provided that (i) the employee has worked for the Company for at least 10 years, (ii) the employee’s age at Retirement plus years of employment with the Company equals at least 70, (iii) the employee provides at least six months written notice of his intent to retire, and (iv) the employee enters into a one year non-compete and employee non-solicitation agreement.
The Company also has an Officer Severance Program (the “Program”) for the benefit of those officers of the Company who do not have employment agreements. Under the Program, in the event an officer who is not otherwise covered by a severance arrangement is terminated (other than for cause) within two years following a change in control (as defined) of the Company, such officer will generally receive a cash lump sum payment equal to the sum of such officer’s base salary and cash bonus, as well as accelerated vesting of stock options and restricted stock. Costs related to the Company’s employment agreements and the Program are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” and therefore are recognized when considered by management to be probable and estimable.
Construction and Development Contingencies
In connection with the pursuit of a Development Right in Pleasant Hill, California, $125,000 in bond financing was issued by the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency (the “Agency”) in connection with the possible future construction of a multifamily rental community by PHVP I, LLC. The bond proceeds were immediately invested in their entirety in a guaranteed investment contract (“GIC”) administered by a trustee. This Development Right is planned as a mixed-use development, with residential, for-sale, retail and office components. The bond proceeds will remain in the GIC until at least June 1, 2007, but no later than December 5, 2007, at which time a loan will be made to PHVP I, LLC to fund construction of the multifamily portion of the development, or the bonds will be redeemed by the Agency. Although the Company does not have any equity or economic interest in PHVP I, LLC at this time, the Company holds an option to make a capital contribution to PHVP I, LLC in exchange for a 99% general partner interest in the entity. Should the Company decide not to exercise this option, the bonds will be redeemed, and a loan will not be made to PHVP I, LLC. The bonds are payable from the proceeds of the GIC and are non-recourse to both PHVP I, LLC and to the Company. There is no loan payable outstanding by PHVP I, LLC as of December 31, 2006.
In addition, as part of providing construction management services to PHVP I, LLC for the construction of a public garage, the Company has provided a construction completion guarantee to the related lender in order to fulfill their standard financing requirements related to the garage construction financing. The Company’s obligations under this guarantee will terminate following construction completion of the garage once all of the lender’s standard completion requirements have been satisfied, which the Company currently expect to occur in 2008. In the third quarter of 2006, significant modifications were requested by the local transit authority to change the garage structure design. The Company does not believe that the requested design changes will impact the construction schedule. However, it is expected that these changes will increase the original budget by an amount up to $5,000. The Company believe that substantially all potential additional amounts are reimbursable from unrelated third parties. At this time, the Company does not believe that it is probable that it will incur any additional costs. The estimated fair value of, and the Company’s obligation under this guarantee, both at inception and as of December 31, 2006 was not significant and therefore the Company has not recorded any obligation for this guarantee as of December 31, 2006.

F-26


 

Legal Contingencies
The Company is currently involved in litigation alleging that 100 communities currently or formerly owned by us violate the accessibility requirements of the Fair Housing Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. The lawsuit, Equal Rights Center v. AvalonBay Communities, Inc., was filed on September 23, 2005 in the federal district court in Maryland. The plaintiff seeks compensatory and punitive damages in unspecified amounts as well as injunctive relief (such as modification of existing communities), an award of attorneys’ fees, expenses and costs of suit. The Company has filed a motion to dismiss all or parts of the suit, which has not been ruled on yet by the court. The Company cannot predict or determine the outcome of this lawsuit, nor is it reasonably possible to estimate the amount of loss, if any, that would be associated with an adverse decision.
During 2006, the Company determined that contaminated soil from imported fill was delivered to its Avalon Lyndhurst development site by third parties. The contaminants exceeded allowable levels for residential use under New Jersey state and local regulations. The remediation effort is substantially complete. The Company has estimated that the net cost associated with this remediation effort after considering insurance proceeds received to date, including costs associated with construction delays, is expected to be approximately $7,500. The Company is pursuing the recovery of these additional net costs through its insurance as well as from the third parties involved, but no assurance can be given as to the amount or timing of reimbursements to the Company. The Company is recording these incremental costs as they are incurred, and potential recoveries as they become certain or are received. Although the estimated costs to complete construction of this community exceed the original construction budget, the Company does not expect that, upon completion, there will be an impairment in value of this asset which would require a write down in the carrying value. The Company will continue to review this assessment based on changes in circumstances or market conditions.
In addition, the Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. These matters are frequently covered by insurance. If it has been determined that a loss is probable to occur, the estimated amount of the loss is expensed in the financial statements. While the resolution of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management currently believes the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position or results of operations of the Company. However, if these matters are resolved unfavorably, they may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.
Lease Obligations
The Company owns nine apartment communities which are located on land subject to land leases expiring between November 2028 and March 2142. In addition, the Company leases certain office space. These leases are accounted for as operating leases under SFAS No. 13, “Accounting for Leases.” These leases have varying escalation terms, and three of these leases have purchase options exercisable between 2006 and 2052. The Company incurred costs of $4,231, $4,486 and $4,399 in the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, related to these leases.
The following table details the future minimum lease payments under the Company’s current leases:
           
Payments due by period
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Thereafter
 
          
$8,045 $8,288 $8,123 $8,091 $8,065 $1,828,108
9. Segment Reporting
The Company’s reportable operating segments include Established Communities, Other Stabilized Communities, and Development/Redevelopment Communities. Annually as of January 1st, the Company determines which of its communities fall into each of these categories and maintains that classification, unless disposition plans regarding a community change, throughout the year for the purpose of reporting segment operations.
  Established Communities (also known as Same Store Communities) are communities where a comparison of operating results from the prior year to the current year is meaningful, as these communities were owned and had stabilized occupancy and operating expenses as of the beginning of the prior year. For the year ended December 31, 2006, the Established Communities are communities that are consolidated for financial reporting purposes, had stabilized occupancy and operating expenses as of January 1, 2005, are not conducting or planning to conduct substantial redevelopment activities and are not held for sale or planned for disposition within the current year. A community is considered to have stabilized occupancy at the earlier of (i) attainment of 95% physical occupancy or (ii) the one-year anniversary of completion of development or redevelopment.

F-27


 

  Other Stabilized Communities includes all other completed communities that have stabilized occupancy, as defined above. Other Stabilized Communities do not include communities that are conducting or planning to conduct substantial redevelopment activities within the current year.
 
  Development/Redevelopment Communities consists of communities that are under construction and have not received a final certificate of occupancy, communities where substantial redevelopment is in progress or is planned to begin during the current year and communities under lease-up, that had not reached stabilized occupancy, as defined above, as of January 1, 2006.
In addition, the Company owns land held for future development and has other corporate assets that are not allocated to an operating segment.
SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” requires that segment disclosures present the measure(s) used by the chief operating decision maker for purposes of assessing such segments’ performance. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is comprised of several members of its executive management team who use Net Operating Income (“NOI”) as the primary financial measure for Established Communities and Other Stabilized Communities. NOI is defined by the Company as total revenue less direct property operating expenses. Although the Company considers NOI a useful measure of a community’s or communities’ operating performance, NOI should not be considered an alternative to net income or net cash flow from operating activities, as determined in accordance with GAAP. NOI excludes a number of income and expense categories as detailed in the reconciliation of NOI to net income.
A reconciliation of NOI to net income for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 is as follows:
             
  For the year ended 
  12-31-06  12-31-05  12-31-04 
 
Net income
 $278,399  $322,378  $219,745 
Indirect operating expenses, net of corporate income
  28,809   26,675   26,612 
Investments and investment management
  7,033   4,834   4,690 
Interest expense, net
  111,046   127,099   131,103 
General and administrative expense
  24,767   25,761   18,074 
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities
  (7,455)  (7,198)  (1,100)
Minority interest in consolidated partnerships
  573   1,481   150 
Venture partner interest in profit-sharing
        1,178 
Depreciation expense
  162,896   158,822   151,991 
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
        (4,547)
Gain on sale of real estate assets
  (110,930)  (199,766)  (122,425)
Income from discontinued operations
  (1,148)  (14,942)  (21,134)
 
         
Net operating income
 $493,990  $445,144  $404,337 
 
         
The primary performance measure for communities under development or redevelopment depends on the stage of completion. While under development, management monitors actual construction costs against budgeted costs as well as lease-up pace and rent levels compared to budget.
The table on the following page provides details of the Company’s segment information as of the dates specified. The segments are classified based on the individual community’s status as of the beginning of the given calendar year. Therefore, each year the composition of communities within each business segment is adjusted. Accordingly, the amounts between years are not directly comparable. The accounting policies applicable to the operating segments described above are the same as those described in Note 1, “Organization and Significant Accounting Policies.” Segment information for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 has been adjusted for the communities that were sold from January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2006 as described in Note 7, “Real Estate Disposition Activities.”

F-28


 

                 
  Total      % NOI change  Gross 
  revenue  NOI  from prior year  real estate (1) 
For the year ended December 31, 2006
                
 
                
Established
                
Northeast
 $204,374  $137,379   5.1% $1,263,190 
Mid-Atlantic
  100,462   72,033   12.5%  591,996 
Midwest
  11,478   7,121   7.4%  92,408 
Pacific Northwest
  33,103   21,819   13.0%  316,089 
Northern California
  153,151   107,135   11.6%  1,441,418 
Southern California
  57,632   41,572   9.1%  373,421 
 
            
Total Established
  560,200   387,059   9.1%  4,078,522 
 
            
Other Stabilized
  93,878   59,432   n/a   865,338 
Development / Redevelopment
  76,356   47,499   n/a   1,324,929 
Land Held for Future Development
  n/a   n/a   n/a   209,568 
Non-allocated (2)
  6,866   n/a   n/a   35,183 
 
                
 
            
Total
 $737,300  $493,990   10.9% $6,513,540 
 
            
 
                
For the year ended December 31, 2005
                
 
                
Established
                
Northeast
 $167,636  $111,734   3.5% $1,062,981 
Mid-Atlantic
  68,575   48,613   3.9%  387,801 
Midwest
  11,113   6,627   7.1%  91,755 
Pacific Northwest
  30,080   19,312   8.0%  315,331 
Northern California
  146,432   99,769   3.5%  1,489,363 
Southern California
  48,800   35,319   6.7%  331,315 
 
            
Total Established
  472,636   321,374   4.2%  3,678,546 
 
            
Other Stabilized
  77,552   50,621   n/a   653,399 
Development / Redevelopment
  116,144   73,149   n/a   1,158,482 
Land Held for Future Development
  n/a   n/a   n/a   179,739 
Non-allocated (2)
  4,348   n/a   n/a   30,741 
 
                
 
            
Total
 $670,680  $445,144   10.1% $5,700,907 
 
            
 
                
For the year ended December 31, 2004
                
 
                
Established
                
Northeast
 $135,059  $89,547   (2.5%) $722,482 
Mid-Atlantic
  51,390   36,316   (0.2%)  273,774 
Midwest
  10,734   6,188   6.8%  91,121 
Pacific Northwest
  28,836   17,874   1.1%  314,717 
Northern California
  126,196   87,067   (5.9%)  1,270,848 
Southern California
  56,124   39,634   1.8%  401,204 
 
            
Total Established
  408,339   276,626   (1.2%)  3,074,146 
 
            
Other Stabilized
  111,894   71,744   n/a   1,068,859 
Development / Redevelopment
  93,096   55,967   n/a   1,019,396 
Land Held for Future Development
  n/a   n/a   n/a   156,350 
Non-allocated (2)
  515   n/a   n/a   27,401 
 
                
 
            
Total
 $613,844  $404,337   9.7% $5,346,152 
 
            
(1) Does not include gross real estate assets for discontinued operations of $65,075, $202,261 and $350,992 as of December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 respectively.
 
(2) Revenue represents third-party management, accounting and developer fees and miscellaneous income which are not allocated to a reportable segment.

F-29


 

10. Stock-Based Compensation Plans
The Company has a stock incentive plan (the “1994 Plan”), which was amended and restated on December 8, 2004, and amended on February 9, 2006 and December 6, 2006. Individuals who are eligible to participate in the 1994 Plan include officers, other associates, outside directors and other key persons of the Company and its subsidiaries who are responsible for or contribute to the management, growth or profitability of the Company and its subsidiaries. The 1994 Plan authorizes (i) the grant of stock options that qualify as incentive stock options (“ISOs”) under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code, (ii) the grant of stock options that do not so qualify, (iii) grants of shares of restricted and unrestricted common stock, (iv) grants of deferred stock awards, (v) performance share awards entitling the recipient to acquire shares of common stock and (vi) dividend equivalent rights.
Shares of common stock of 1,791,861, 2,066,308 and 2,311,249 were available for future option or restricted stock grant awards under the 1994 Plan as of December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Annually on January 1st, the maximum number available for issuance under the 1994 Plan is increased by between 0.48% and 1.00% of the total number of shares of common stock and DownREIT units actually outstanding on such date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the maximum number of shares of stock for which ISOs may be issued under the 1994 Plan shall not exceed 2,500,000 and no awards shall be granted under the 1994 Plan after May 11, 2011. Options and restricted stock granted under the 1994 Plan vest and expire over varying periods, as determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.
Before the Merger, Avalon had adopted its 1995 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Avalon 1995 Incentive Plan”). Under the Avalon 1995 Incentive Plan, a maximum number of 3,315,054 shares (or 2,546,956 shares as adjusted for the Merger) of common stock were issuable, plus any shares of common stock represented by awards under Avalon’s 1993 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Avalon 1993 Plan”) that were forfeited, canceled, reacquired by Avalon, satisfied without the issuance of common stock or otherwise terminated (other than by exercise). Options granted to officers, non-employee directors and associates under the Avalon 1995 Incentive Plan generally vested over a three-year term, expire ten years from the date of grant and are exercisable at the market price on the date of grant.
In connection with the Merger, the exercise prices and the number of options under the Avalon 1995 Incentive Plan and the Avalon 1993 Plan were adjusted to reflect the equivalent Bay shares and exercise prices based on the 0.7683 share conversion ratio used in the Merger. Officers, non-employee directors and associates with Avalon 1995 Incentive Plan or Avalon 1993 Plan options may exercise their adjusted number of options for the Company’s common stock at the adjusted exercise price. As of June 4, 1998, the date of the Merger, options and other awards ceased to be granted under the Avalon 1993 Plan or the Avalon 1995 Incentive Plan. Accordingly, there were no options to purchase shares of common stock available for grant under the Avalon 1995 Incentive Plan or the Avalon 1993 Plan at December 31, 2006, 2005 or 2004.

F-30


 

Information with respect to stock options granted under the 1994 Plan, the Avalon 1995 Incentive Plan and the Avalon 1993 Plan is as follows:
                 
      Weighted  Avalon 1995  Weighted 
      average  and Avalon  average 
  1994 Plan  exercise price  1993 Plan  exercise price 
  shares  per share  shares  per share 
 
Options Outstanding, December 31, 2003
  2,979,265  $39.57   473,962  $37.32 
Exercised
  (1,167,679)  39.06   (287,700)  37.05 
Granted
  545,809   50.71       
Forfeited
  (80,577)  43.98       
 
            
Options Outstanding, December 31, 2004
  2,276,818  $42.39   186,262  $36.23 
 
            
Exercised
  (743,524)  41.89   (159,638)  37.82 
Granted
  725,988   70.09       
Forfeited
  (29,504)  55.66       
 
            
Options Outstanding, December 31, 2005
  2,229,778  $51.40   26,624  $37.09 
 
            
Exercised
  (592,308)  50.09   (22,384)  37.15 
Granted
  867,113   99.28       
Forfeited
  (17,344)  79.72       
 
            
Options Outstanding, December 31, 2006
  2,487,239  $69.65   4,240  $36.81 
 
            
 
                
Options Exercisable:
                
December 31, 2004
  1,366,009  $39.72   186,262  $38.15 
 
            
December 31, 2005
  1,158,591  $42.45   26,624  $37.09 
 
            
December 31, 2006
  1,041,360  $47.99   4,240  $36.81 
 
            
For options outstanding at December 31, 2006 under the 1994 Plan, 350,919 options had exercise prices ranging between $31.50 and $39.99 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 3.0 years, 300,697 options had exercise prices ranging between $40.00 and $49.99 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 4.7 years, 336,181 options had exercise prices between $50.00 and $59.99 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 7.1 years, 637,142 options had exercise prices ranging between $69.93 and $79.99 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 8.1 years, 851,800 options had exercise prices ranging between $81.42 and $99.99 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 9.1 years, and 10,500 options had exercise prices between $103.00 and $123.03 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 9.5 years. Options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2006 for the Avalon 1993 and Avalon 1995 Plans had exercise prices ranging from $35.31 to $37.66 and a weighted average contractual life of approximately one year and an intrinsic value of $395. Options outstanding under the 1994 Plan at December 31, 2006 had an intrinsic value of $153,922. Options exercisable at December 31, 2006 under the 1994 plan had a weighted average contractual life of 5.3 years and an intrinsic value of $85,454. The intrinsic value of options exercised during 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $49,440, $80,271 and $133,003, respectively.
The weighted average fair value of the options granted during 2006 is estimated at $11.47 per share on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: dividend yield of 5.0% over the expected life of the option, volatility of 17.61%, risk-free interest rates of 4.55% and an expected life of approximately 7 years. The weighted average fair value of the options granted during 2005 is estimated at $6.40 per share on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: dividend yield of 5.5% over the expected life of the option, volatility of 17.56%, risk-free interest rates of 3.91% and an expected life of approximately 7 years. The weighted average fair value of the options granted during 2004 is estimated at $3.87 per share on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: dividend yield of 6.05% over the expected life of the option, volatility of 17.28%, risk-free interest rates of 3.58% and an expected life of approximately 7 years. The cost related to stock-based employee compensation for employee stock options included in the determination of net income is based on estimated forfeitures for the given year. Estimated forfeitures are adjusted to reflect actual forfeitures at the end of the vesting period.
The Company issued restricted stock as part of its stock-based compensation plan during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. Compensation cost is recognized over the requisite service period, which varies, but does not exceed five years. The fair value of restricted stock is the closing stock price on the date of the grant. Provisions of SFAS 123(R) require the Company to recognize compensation cost taking into consideration retirement eligibility. The cost related to stock-based compensation for restricted stock included in the determination of net income is based on actual forfeitures for the given year. Restricted stock awards typically vest over a five year period with the exception of accelerated vesting provisions, which are infrequent and occur on a case by case basis. Restricted stock vesting during 2006 had fair values ranging from $36.66 to $102.88 per share. The total fair value of shares vested was $7,655, $8,932, and $4,859 for the periods ended December 31, 2006, December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 respectively.

F-31


 

Total compensation cost recognized in income relating to deferred compensation for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $10,095, $4,292 and $2,593 respectively. Total capitalized compensation cost for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $4,014, $4,046 and $2,339 respectively. At December 31, 2006, there was a total of $8,490 and $11,560 in unrecognized compensation cost for unvested stock options and unvested restricted stock, respectively. The unrecognized compensation cost for stock options does not take into account estimated forfeitures. The unrecognized compensation cost for unvested stock options and restricted stock is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.9 years and 2.5 years, respectively.
In October 1996, the Company adopted the 1996 Non-Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan (as amended, the “ESPP”). Initially 1,000,000 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under this plan. There are currently 789,312 shares remaining available for issuance under the plan. Full-time employees of the Company generally are eligible to participate in the ESPP if, as of the last day of the applicable election period, they have been employed by the Company for at least one month. All other employees of the Company are eligible to participate provided that, as of the applicable election period they have been employed by the Company for 12 months. Under the ESPP, eligible employees are permitted to acquire shares of the Company’s common stock through payroll deductions, subject to maximum purchase limitations. The purchase period is a period of seven months beginning each April 1 and ending each October 30. The purchase price for common stock purchased under the plan is 85% of the lesser of the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the first day of the applicable purchase period or the last day of the applicable purchase period. The offering dates, purchase dates and duration of purchase periods may be changed, if the change is announced prior to the beginning of the affected date or purchase period. The Company issued 10,830 shares, 13,372 shares and 14,476 shares and recognized compensation expense of $173, $134 and $109 under the ESPP for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The Company accounts for transactions under the ESPP using the fair value method prescribed under SFAS No. 123(R), as further discussed in Note 1, “Organization and Significant Accounting Policies.”
11. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Cash and cash equivalent balances are held with various financial institutions and may at times exceed the applicable Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limit. The Company monitors credit ratings of these financial institutions and the concentration of cash and cash equivalent balances with any one financial institution and believes the likelihood of realizing material losses from the excess of cash and cash equivalent balances over insurance limits is remote.
The following estimated fair values of financial instruments were determined by management using available market information and established valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow. Accordingly, the estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize on disposition of the financial instruments. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
  Cash equivalents, rents receivable, accounts and construction payable and accrued expenses, and other liabilities are carried at their face amounts, which reasonably approximate their fair values.
 
  Bond indebtedness and notes payable with an aggregate outstanding per amount of approximately $2,829,000 and $2,268,000 had an estimated aggregate fair value of $2,940,000 and $2,394,000 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
 
  The Company reports all derivative instruments at for value in accordance with SFAS No. 133, as amended. See Note 5, “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” for further discussions.

F-32


 

12. Related Party Arrangements
Unconsolidated Entities
The Company manages unconsolidated real estate entities for which it receives asset management, property management, development and redevelopment fee revenue. From these entities, the Company received fees of $6,259, $4,304 and $604 in the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. These fees are included in management, development and other fees on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income.
In addition, in connection with the construction management services that the Company provided to MVP I, LLC, the entity that owns and developed Avalon at Mission Bay North II, the Company funds certain construction costs that are expected to be reimbursed through construction financing within 30 to 60 days. Construction was completed in 2005, and depending on the timing of such funding, the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets may reflect a corresponding receivable in prepaid expenses and other assets or a corresponding liability in accrued expenses and other liabilities. The Company has recorded receivables in the amounts of $5,654 as of December 31, 2006 and $6,653 as of December 31, 2005, from MVP I, LLC. The Company expects to be reimbursed through draws on a construction loan within 30 to 60 days.
Director Compensation
The 1994 Plan provides that directors of the Company who are also employees receive no additional compensation for their services as a director. On May 14, 2003, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an amendment to the 1994 Plan pursuant to which each non-employee director would receive, following the 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and each annual meeting thereafter, (i) a number of shares of restricted stock (or deferred stock awards) having a value of $100 based on the last reported sale price of the common stock on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) on the fifth business day following the prior year’s annual meeting and (ii) $30 cash, payable in quarterly installments of $7.5. A non-employee director may elect to receive all or a portion of such cash payment in the form of a deferred stock award. In addition, the Lead Independent Director receives an annual fee of $30 payable in equal monthly installments of $2.5. In February 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors approved another amendment to the 1994 Plan under which (i) following the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders the cash payment was adjusted to $40, payable in quarterly installments of $10 and (ii) following the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the number of shares of restricted stock (or deferred stock awards) will be calculated based on the closing price on the day of the award (rather than the closing price on the award date of the prior year). The Company recorded non-employee director compensation expense relating to the restricted stock grants, deferred stock awards and stock options in the amount of $1,013, $966 and $940 in the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively as a component of general and administrative expenses. Deferred compensation relating to these restricted stock grants, deferred stock awards and stock options was $778 and $579 on December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.

F-33


 

13. Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
The following summary represents the quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005:
                 
  For the three months ended 
  3-31-06  6-30-06  9-30-06  12-31-06 
 
Total revenue
 $175,158  $180,675  $187,667  $193,800 
Income from continuing operations(1)
 $47,582  $37,906  $45,076  $49,276 
Income from discontinued operations(1)
 $66,495  $32,063       
Net income available to common stockholders
 $111,902  $67,794  $42,901  $47,101 
Net income per common share — basic(2)
 $1.52  $0.91  $0.58  $0.63 
Net income per common share — diluted(2)
 $1.49  $0.90  $0.57  $0.62 
                 
  For the three months ended 
  3-31-05  6-30-05  9-30-05  12-31-05 
 
Total revenue
 $161,245  $165,586  $170,751  $173,098 
Income from continuing operations(1)
 $27,861  $29,977  $26,885  $27,426 
Income from discontinued operations(1)
 $41,749  $26,934  $72,243  $69,303 
Net income available to common stockholders
 $67,435  $54,736  $96,953  $94,554 
Net income per common share — basic(2)
 $0.93  $0.75  $1.32  $1.29 
Net income per common share — diluted(2)
 $0.92  $0.74  $1.30  $1.26 
 
   
(1) Amounts may not equal previously reported results due to reclassification between income from continuing operations and income from discontinued operations.
 
(2) Amounts may not equal full year results due to rounding.
14. Subsequent Events
In January 2007, the Company filed a new shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission, allowing the Company to sell an undetermined number or amount of certain debt and equity securities as defined in the prospectus. In addition, in conjunction with its inclusion in the S&P 500 Index in January 2007, the Company issued 4,600,000 shares of its common stock at $129.30 per share. Net proceeds in the amount of approximately $594,000 will be used for general corporate purposes.
In January 2007, the Company purchased a parcel of land located in New York, NY for $70,000. The Company expects to begin construction on this parcel of a 628 apartment-home community in the fourth quarter of 2007.
In January 2007, the Fund acquired Centerpoint, a newly constructed high-rise tower and separate, recently renovated historic mid-rise buildings located within a single downtown city block of Baltimore, MD. Centerpoint was acquired for a purchase price of $78,500. The community contains a total of 392 apartment homes and approximately 33,000 square feet of retail space.

F-34


 

AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2006
(Dollars in thousands)
                                       
  Initial Cost      Total Cost             
      Building / Costs     Building /                
      Construction in Subsequent to     Construction in         Total Cost, Net of     Year of
      Progress & Acquisition /     Progress &     Accumulated Accumulated     Completion /
  Land Improvements Construction Land Improvements Total Depreciation Depreciation Encumbrances Acquisition
Current Communities
                                      
 
                                      
Avalon at Bedford Center
  4,238   20,477   1   4,238   20,478   24,716   763   23,953     2006
Avalon at Center Place
     26,816   1,928      28,744   28,744   9,561   19,183     1991/1997
Avalon at Crane Brook
  12,381   42,298   102   12,381   42,400   54,781   3,569   51,212   33,535  2004
Avalon at Faxon Park
  1,136   14,001   520   1,136   14,521   15,657   4,540   11,117     1998
Avalon at Flanders Hill
  3,572   33,504   126   3,572   33,630   37,202   5,198   32,004   21,245  2003
Avalon at Lexington
  2,124   12,599   1,311   2,124   13,910   16,034   5,898   10,136   12,467  1994
Avalon at Newton Highlands
  11,038   45,527   99   11,038   45,626   56,664   5,385   51,279   37,650  2003
Avalon at Prudential Center
  25,811   104,399   26,443   25,811   130,842   156,653   34,972   121,681     1968/1998
Avalon at Stevens Pond
  10,704   43,506   75   10,704   43,581   54,285   5,005   49,280     2004
Avalon at The Pinehills I
  3,623   16,292   28   3,623   16,320   19,943   1,361   18,582     2004
Avalon Essex
  5,230   16,303   284   5,230   16,587   21,817   4,105   17,712     2000
Avalon Ledges
  2,627   33,443   297   2,627   33,740   36,367   5,515   30,852   18,635  2002
Avalon Oaks
  2,129   18,656   472   2,129   19,128   21,257   5,357   15,900   17,205  1999
Avalon Oaks West
  3,303   13,467   74   3,303   13,541   16,844   2,430   14,414   17,036  2002
Avalon Orchards
  2,975   18,037   138   2,975   18,175   21,150   3,134   18,016   19,883  2002
Avalon Summit
  1,743   14,670   932   1,743   15,602   17,345   5,747   11,598     1986/1996
Avalon West
  943   9,881   508   943   10,389   11,332   3,702   7,630   8,179  1996
Essex Place
  4,643   19,007   77   4,643   19,084   23,727   1,571   22,156     2004
Avalon at Greyrock Place
  13,819   56,499   75   13,819   56,574   70,393   8,883   61,510     2002
Avalon Danbury
  4,905   30,520   29   4,905   30,549   35,454   1,573   33,881     2005
Avalon Darien
  6,922   34,594   3   6,922   34,597   41,519   3,857   37,662     2004
Avalon Gates
  4,414   31,268   1,423   4,414   32,691   37,105   10,820   26,285     1997
Avalon Glen
  5,956   23,993   2,194   5,956   26,187   32,143   11,465   20,678     1991
Avalon Haven
  1,264   12,491   232   1,264   12,723   13,987   3,066   10,921     2000
Avalon Milford I
  8,746   22,695   (0)  8,746   22,695   31,441   1,931   29,510     2004
Avalon New Canaan
  4,835   19,485   44   4,835   19,529   24,364   3,172   21,192     2002
Avalon on Stamford Harbor
  10,836   51,989   61   10,836   52,050   62,886   8,328   54,558     2003
Avalon Orange
  2,108   19,983   5   2,108   19,988   22,096   1,282   20,814     2005
Avalon Springs
  2,116   14,664   414   2,116   15,078   17,194   5,105   12,089     1996
Avalon Valley
  2,277   23,781   252   2,277   24,033   26,310   6,525   19,785     1999
Avalon Walk I & II
  9,102   48,796   7,563   9,102   56,359   65,461   21,389   44,072     1992/1994
Avalon at Glen Cove South
  7,871   59,969   62   7,871   60,031   67,902   5,150   62,752     2004
Avalon Commons
  4,679   28,509   527   4,679   29,036   33,715   9,454   24,261     1997
Avalon Court
  9,228   50,021   573   9,228   50,594   59,822   14,172   45,650     1997/2000
Avalon Pines I
  6,178   40,564   (205)  6,178   40,359   46,537   2,625   43,912     2005
Avalon Pines II
  2,943   20,923   0   2,943   20,923   23,866   556   23,310     2006
Avalon Towers
  3,118   12,709   5,451   3,118   18,160   21,278   6,102   15,176     1990/1995
Avalon at Edgewater
  14,529   60,240   445   14,529   60,685   75,214   11,184   64,030     2002
Avalon at Florham Park
  6,647   34,909   260   6,647   35,169   41,816   7,842   33,974     2001
Avalon Cove
  8,760   82,442   1,670   8,760   84,112   92,872   28,326   64,546     1997
Avalon at Freehold
  4,116   30,514   118   4,116   30,632   34,748   5,527   29,221     2002

F-35


 

AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

December 31, 2006
(Dollars in thousands)
                                       
  Initial Cost      Total Cost             
      Building / Costs     Building /                
      Construction in Subsequent to     Construction in         Total Cost, Net of     Year of
      Progress & Acquisition /     Progress &     Accumulated Accumulated     Completion /
  Land Improvements Construction Land Improvements Total Depreciation Depreciation Encumbrances Acquisition
Avalon Run
  13,060   45,855   1,130   13,060   46,985   60,045   145   59,900     1994
Avalon Run East
  1,579   14,668   111   1,579   14,779   16,358   5,232   11,126     1996
Avalon Run East II
  6,765   45,377   2   6,765   45,379   52,144   3,409   48,735     2003
Avalon Watch
  5,585   22,394   2,159   5,585   24,553   30,138   11,357   18,781     1988
Avalon Bowery Place
  18,668   70,739   170   18,668   70,909   89,577   433   89,144   93,800  2006
Avalon Gardens
  8,428   45,660   1,024   8,428   46,684   55,112   14,590   40,522     1998
Avalon Green
  1,820   10,525   898   1,820   11,423   13,243   4,361   8,882     1995
Avalon on the Sound
     116,231   867      117,098   117,098   18,931   98,167     2001
Avalon Riverview I
     94,166   395      94,561   94,561   14,611   79,950     2002
Avalon View
  3,529   14,140   1,598   3,529   15,738   19,267   6,871   12,396   15,980  1993
Avalon Willow
  6,207   40,791   516   6,207   41,307   47,514   10,373   37,141     2000
The Avalon
  2,889   28,324   143   2,889   28,467   31,356   7,457   23,899     1999
Avalon at Fairway Hills I & II
  4,147   16,599   2,025   4,147   18,624   22,771   7,546   15,225   11,500  1987/1996
Avalon at Fairway Hills III
  4,465   17,864   7,024   4,465   24,888   29,353   7,301   22,052     1987/1996
Avalon at Symphony Glen
  1,594   6,384   1,377   1,594   7,761   9,355   3,875   5,480   9,780  1986
Avalon Landing
  1,849   7,409   930   1,849   8,339   10,188   3,460   6,728   5,903  1984/1995
Southgate Crossing
  7,207   29,151   0   7,207   29,151   36,358   203   36,155     2006
AutumnWoods
  6,096   24,400   2,705   6,096   27,105   33,201   8,858   24,343     1989/1996
Avalon at Arlington Square
  22,041   90,296   272   22,041   90,568   112,609   17,183   95,426     2001
Avalon at Ballston Washington
  7,291   29,177   1,642   7,291   30,819   38,110   13,310   24,800     1990
Avalon at Cameron Court
  10,292   32,930   311   10,292   33,241   43,533   10,421   33,112     1998
Avalon at Decoverly
  6,157   24,800   1,341   6,157   26,141   32,298   10,160   22,138     1991/1995
Avalon at Foxhall
  6,848   27,614   9,926   6,848   37,540   44,388   13,727   30,661     1982
Avalon at Gallery Place I
  9,084   39,731   58   9,084   39,789   48,873   5,138   43,735     2003
Avalon at Grosvenor Station
  24,751   57,331   75   24,751   57,406   82,157   5,649   76,508     2004
Avalon at Providence Park
  2,152   8,907   621   2,152   9,528   11,680   3,207   8,473     1988/1997
Avalon at Rock Spring
     46,003   257      46,260   46,260   6,524   39,736     2003
Avalon at Traville
  14,360   55,382   5   14,360   55,387   69,747   5,504   64,243     2004
Avalon Crescent
  13,851   43,397   353   13,851   43,750   57,601   14,666   42,935     1996
Avalon Fields I & II
  4,047   18,553   178   4,047   18,731   22,778   6,712   16,066   10,483  1998
Avalon Knoll
  1,528   6,136   1,731   1,528   7,867   9,395   3,795   5,600   11,957  1985
Avalon Arlington Heights
  9,728   39,661   6,468   9,728   46,129   55,857   8,787   47,070     1987/2000
Avalon at Danada Farms
  7,535   30,623   814   7,535   31,437   38,972   9,721   29,251     1997
Avalon at Stratford Green
  4,326   17,569   269   4,326   17,838   22,164   5,520   16,644     1997
Avalon at West Grove
  5,149   20,656   5,467   5,149   26,123   31,272   8,324   22,948     1967
Avalon at Bear Creek
  6,786   27,154   917   6,786   28,071   34,857   8,297   26,560     1998
Avalon Bellevue
  6,664   24,119   79   6,664   24,198   30,862   5,264   25,598     2001
Avalon Belltown
  5,644   12,733   67   5,644   12,800   18,444   2,555   15,889     2001
Avalon Brandemoor
  8,630   36,679   337   8,630   37,016   45,646   7,565   38,081     2001
Avalon HighGrove
  7,569   32,041   269   7,569   32,310   39,879   6,991   32,888     2000
Avalon ParcSquare
  3,789   15,143   313   3,789   15,456   19,245   3,631   15,614     2000
Avalon Redmond Place
  4,558   17,568   4,283   4,558   21,851   26,409   7,181   19,228     1991/1997
Avalon RockMeadow
  4,777   19,726   303   4,777   20,029   24,806   4,656   20,150     2000

F-36


 

AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

December 31, 2006
(Dollars in thousands)
                                       
  Initial Cost      Total Cost             
      Building / Costs     Building /                
      Construction in Subsequent to     Construction in         Total Cost, Net of     Year of
      Progress & Acquisition /     Progress &     Accumulated Accumulated     Completion /
  Land Improvements Construction Land Improvements Total Depreciation Depreciation Encumbrances Acquisition
Avalon WildReed
  4,253   18,676   166   4,253   18,842   23,095   4,343   18,752     2000
Avalon Wynhaven
  11,412   41,142   290   11,412   41,432   52,844   8,424   44,420     2001
Avalon at Union Square
  4,249   16,820   1,512   4,249   18,332   22,581   5,654   16,927     1973/1996
Avalon at Willow Creek
  6,581   26,583   3,048   6,581   29,631   36,212   8,958   27,254     1985/1994
Avalon Dublin
  5,276   19,642   2,948   5,276   22,590   27,866   6,574   21,292     1989/1997
Avalon Fremont
  10,746   43,399   2,467   10,746   45,866   56,612   13,721   42,891     1994
Avalon Pleasanton
  11,610   46,552   4,188   11,610   50,740   62,350   15,564   46,786     1988/1994
Waterford
  11,324   45,717   4,645   11,324   50,362   61,686   15,675   46,011   33,100  1985/1986
Avalon at Cedar Ridge
  4,230   9,659   12,657   4,230   22,316   26,546   6,810   19,736     1972/1997
Avalon at Diamond Heights
  4,726   19,130   1,471   4,726   20,601   25,327   6,290   19,037     1972/1994
Avalon at Mission Bay North
  13,814   78,452   546   13,814   78,998   92,812   10,517   82,295     2003
Avalon at Nob Hill
  5,403   21,567   1,101   5,403   22,668   28,071   6,750   21,321   20,800  1990/1995
Avalon Foster City
  7,852   31,445   4,291   7,852   35,736   43,588   10,340   33,248     1973/1994
Avalon Pacifica
  6,125   24,796   1,244   6,125   26,040   32,165   7,775   24,390   17,600  1971/1995
Avalon Sunset Towers
  3,561   21,321   3,896   3,561   25,217   28,778   8,140   20,638     1961/1996
Avalon Towers by the Bay
  9,155   57,624   227   9,155   57,851   67,006   14,606   52,400     1999
Crowne Ridge
  5,982   16,885   10,196   5,982   27,081   33,063   8,283   24,780     1973/1996
Avalon at Blossom Hill
  11,933   48,247   1,880   11,933   50,127   62,060   14,967   47,093     1995
Avalon at Cahill Park
  4,760   47,600   210   4,760   47,810   52,570   7,528   45,042     2002
Avalon at Creekside
  6,546   26,301   10,576   6,546   36,877   43,423   10,485   32,938     1962/1997
Avalon at Foxchase I & II
  11,340   45,532   3,798   11,340   49,330   60,670   15,288   45,382   26,400  1988/1987
Avalon at Parkside
  7,406   29,823   989   7,406   30,812   38,218   9,257   28,961     1991/1996
Avalon at Pruneyard
  3,414   15,469   13,258   3,414   28,727   32,141   9,002   23,139     1968/1997
Avalon at River Oaks
  8,904   35,121   984   8,904   36,105   45,009   10,635   34,374     1990/1996
Avalon Campbell
  11,830   47,828   456   11,830   48,284   60,114   14,365   45,749   38,800  1995
Avalon Mountain View
  9,755   39,393   2,461   9,755   41,854   51,609   12,634   38,975   18,300  1986
Avalon on the Alameda
  6,119   50,230   157   6,119   50,387   56,506   13,929   42,577     1999
Avalon Rosewalk
  15,814   62,028   1,522   15,814   63,550   79,364   18,233   61,131     1997/1999
Avalon Silicon Valley
  20,713   99,573   1,837   20,713   101,410   122,123   29,967   92,156     1997
Avalon Towers on the Peninsula
  9,560   56,136   56   9,560   56,192   65,752   9,588   56,164     2002
Countrybrook
  9,384   34,958   4,448   9,384   39,406   48,790   11,872   36,918   15,990  1985/1996
San Marino
  6,607   26,673   1,737   6,607   28,410   35,017   8,616   26,401     1984/1988
Avalon at Media Center
  22,483   28,104   25,874   22,483   53,978   76,461   15,382   61,079     1961/1997
Avalon at Warner Center
  7,045   12,986   6,912   7,045   19,898   26,943   6,935   20,008     1979/1998
Avalon Camarillo
  8,454   38,720   (0)  8,454   38,720   47,174   866   46,308     2006
Avalon at Glendale
     40,248   0      40,248   40,248   4,757   35,491     2003
Avalon Woodland Hills
  23,828   40,372   7,873   23,828   48,245   72,073   16,163   55,910     1989/1997
The Promenade
  14,052   56,827   124   14,052   56,951   71,003   8,957   62,046   31,495  1988/2002
Avalon Del Rey
  6,541   58,535   (1)  6,541   58,534   65,075   724   64,351   40,845  2006
Avalon at Pacific Bay
  4,871   19,745   7,680   4,871   27,425   32,296   8,256   24,040     1971/1997
Avalon at South Coast
  4,709   16,063   4,718   4,709   20,781   25,490   6,554   18,936     1973/1996
Avalon Mission Viejo
  2,517   9,257   2,238   2,517   11,495   14,012   3,521   10,491   7,635  1984/1996
Avalon Newport
  1,975   3,814   4,563   1,975   8,377   10,352   2,537   7,815     1956/1996

F-37


 

AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

December 31, 2006
(Dollars in thousands)
                                       
  Initial Cost      Total Cost             
      Building / Costs     Building /                
      Construction in Subsequent to     Construction in         Total Cost, Net of     Year of
      Progress & Acquisition /     Progress &     Accumulated Accumulated     Completion /
  Land Improvements Construction Land Improvements Total Depreciation Depreciation Encumbrances Acquisition
Avalon Santa Margarita
  4,607   16,911   2,843   4,607   19,754   24,361   6,055   18,306     1990/1997
Avalon at Cortez Hill
  2,768   20,134   11,654   2,768   31,788   34,556   9,344   25,212     1973/1998
Avalon at Mission Bay
  9,922   40,633   15,726   9,922   56,359   66,281   16,313   49,968     1969/1997
Avalon at Mission Ridge
  2,710   10,924   8,787   2,710   19,711   22,421   6,021   16,400     1960/1997
     
 
 $921,900  $4,356,642  $312,294  $921,900  $4,668,936  $5,590,836  $1,076,823  $4,514,013  $596,203   
     
 
                                      
Development Communities
                                      
 
                                      
Avalon Decoverly II
  3,364   14,864   11,195   3,364   26,059   29,423   132   29,291      
Avalon at Dublin Station
     17   42,334      42,351   42,351      42,351      
Avalon at Glen Cove North
     107   27,030      27,137   27,137      27,137      
Avalon at Lexington Hills
     52   22,559      22,611   22,611      22,611      
Avalon Acton
        16,672      16,672   16,672      16,672   45,000   
Avalon Bowery Place II
     41   14,966      15,007   15,007      15,007   48,500   
Avalon Chestnut Hill
  10,626   34,527   14,773   10,626   49,300   59,926   223   59,703      
Avalon Danvers
     127   46,306      46,433   46,433      46,433      
Avalon Encino
     38   22,833      22,871   22,871      22,871      
Avalon Lyndhurst
     285   63,941      64,226   64,226      64,226      
Avalon Meydenbauer
     147   35,942      36,089   36,089      36,089      
Avalon on the Sound II
     71   102,002      102,073   102,073      102,073      
Avalon Riverview North
     49   85,765      85,814   85,814      85,814      
Avalon Shrewsbury
  3,258   19,798   10,487   3,258   30,285   33,543   223   33,320      
Avalon Wilshire
     222   38,116      38,338   38,338      38,338      
Avalon Woburn
  3,320   10,125   47,832   3,320   57,957   61,277   84   61,193      
Avalon Canoga Park
     19   14,012      14,031   14,031      14,031      
     
 
 $20,568  $80,490  $616,764  $20,568  $697,254  $717,822  $662  $717,160  $93,500   
     
 
                                      
Land held for development
  209,568         209,568      209,568      209,568   23,650   
Corporate Overhead
  22,327   13,370   24,692   22,327   38,062   60,389   23,073   37,316   2,153,078   
     
 
 $1,174,363  $4,450,502  $953,750  $1,174,363  $5,404,252  $6,578,615  $1,100,558  $5,478,057  $2,866,431   
     

F-38


 

AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

December 31, 2006
(Dollars in thousands)
Amounts include real estate assets held for sale.
Depreciation of AvalonBay Communities, Inc. building, improvements, upgrades and furniture, fixtures and equipment (FF&E) is calculated over the following useful lives, on a straight line basis:
Building — 30 years
Improvements, upgrades and FF&E — not to exceed 7 years
The aggregate cost of total real estate for Federal income tax purposes was approximately $6,579,000 at December 31, 2006.
The changes in total real estate assets for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:
             
  Years ended December 31, 
  2006  2005  2004 
Balance, beginning of period
 $5,903,168  $5,697,144  $5,431,757 
Acquisitions, construction costs and improvements
  825,981   528,118   520,643 
Dispositions, including impairment loss on planned dispositions
  (150,534)  (322,094)  (255,256)
 
         
Balance, end of period
 $6,578,615  $5,903,168  $5,697,144 
 
         
The changes in accumulated depreciation for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, are as follows:
             
  Years ended December 31, 
  2006  2005  2004 
Balance, beginning of period
 $957,380  $819,319  $695,368 
Depreciation, including discontinued operations
  162,896   162,063   162,667 
Dispositions
  (19,718)  (24,002)  (38,716)
 
         
Balance, end of period
 $1,100,558  $957,380  $819,319 
 
         

F-39