UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004
Commission file number 001-31721
AXIS CAPITAL HOLDINGS LIMITED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Bermuda
98-0395986
(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)
106 Pitts Bay Road, Pembroke HM 08, Bermuda
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
(441) 296-2600(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý
As of November 4, 2004, there were 154,907,232 Common Shares, $0.0125 par value per share, of the registrant outstanding.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as at September 30, 2004 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2003
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the Quarters and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 (Unaudited)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 (Unaudited)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 (Unaudited)
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Item 2.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Legal Proceedings
Item 6.
Exhibits
Signatures
i
PART 1 - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share amounts)
September 30, 2004
December 31, 2003
(Unaudited)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
935,331
605,175
Fixed maturity investments at fair market value (Amortized cost 2004: $4,335,707; 2003: $3,359,102)
4,360,522
3,385,576
Other investments
83,143
Accrued interest receivable
33,588
29,530
Net receivable for investments sold
3,371
Securities lending collateral
765,273
Insurance and reinsurance premium balances receivable
924,575
660,530
Deferred acquisition costs
229,102
136,281
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
234,182
164,999
Reinsurance recoverable
551,164
124,899
Intangible assets
23,536
24,579
Other assets
62,716
37,333
Total Assets
8,203,132
5,172,273
Liabilities
Reserve for losses and loss expenses
2,223,234
992,846
Unearned premiums
1,682,119
1,143,447
Insurance and reinsurance balances payable
190,195
151,381
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
59,957
67,451
Securities lending payable
765,333
Net payable for investments purchased
197,302
Total Liabilities
5,118,140
2,355,125
Shareholders Equity
Share capital (Authorized 800,000,000 common shares, par value $0.0125; issued and outstanding 2004: 152,539,621; 2003:152,474,011)
1,906
Additional paid-in capital
2,013,325
2,000,731
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax
22,997
25,164
Retained earnings
1,046,764
789,347
Total Shareholders Equity
3,084,992
2,817,148
Total Liabilities & Shareholders Equity
See accompanying notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
1
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS ANDCOMPREHENSIVE INCOMEFor the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share amounts)
Quarters ended
Nine months ended
September 30, 2003
Revenues
Gross premiums written
687,700
633,942
2,361,142
1,793,979
Premiums ceded
(125,688
)
(99,567
(412,063
(269,636
Change in unearned premiums
(40,214
(136,909
(469,630
(488,858
Net premiums earned
521,798
397,466
1,479,449
1,035,485
Net investment income
40,017
19,342
104,621
46,598
Net realized gains (losses)
3,732
(5,713
9,418
21,190
Other insurance related income
7,206
8,548
7,650
19,756
Total revenues
572,753
419,643
1,601,138
1,123,029
Expenses
Net losses and loss expenses
445,575
184,180
946,025
526,135
Acquisition costs (related party 2004: $30,364; 2003: $20,799: 2004; $76,796; 2003 $60,143)
79,222
56,101
201,674
146,770
General and administrative expenses
47,537
34,843
132,048
96,451
Foreign exchange
(3,459
(4,574
4,099
(19,316
Total expenses
568,875
270,550
1,283,846
750,040
Income before income taxes
3,878
149,093
317,292
372,989
Income tax recovery (expense)
2,401
(2,111
(3,369
(1,135
Net Income
6,279
146,982
313,923
371,854
Other comprehensive income
Unrealized gains arising during the period
53,176
6,190
5,707
23,172
Adjustment for re-classification of gains (losses) realized in income, net of tax
1,014
(4,321
(7,874
(9,067
Comprehensive income, net of tax
60,469
148,851
311,756
385,959
Weighted average common shares and common share equivalents - basic
152,534,495
151,453,213
152,523,144
141,499,081
Weighted average common shares and common share equivalents - diluted
166,128,928
163,232,232
166,401,498
151,322,233
Net income per share - basic
0.04
0.97
2.06
2.63
Net income per share - diluted
0.90
1.89
2.46
2
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITYFor the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)
Share capital
Balance at beginning of period
1,727
Issued during period
202
Balance at end of period
1,929
1,686,599
Shares issued, net of costs
(797
328,637
Stock option expense
2,317
Stock compensation expense
11,074
2,015,236
Deferred compensation
(20,576
Issue of restricted shares
(1,260
Amortization of deferred compensation
6,231
(15,605
25,484
Change in unrealized (loss) gain
(1,385
14,105
Change in deferred taxes
(782
39,589
267,799
Dividends paid
(56,506
Net income for period
639,653
2,680,802
3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSFor the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)
Cash flows provided by operating activities:
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Net realized gains on sales of investments
(9,418
(21,190
Amortization of discounts on fixed maturities
25,912
27,664
13,391
Amortization of intangible assets
1,178
750
(4,058
(5,110
(264,045
(315,399
(92,821
(75,676
(69,183
(112,813
(426,265
(98,449
(135
(26,165
(14,964
1,230,388
569,107
538,672
597,334
38,814
32,136
(7,434
23,380
Total adjustments
948,831
613,001
Net cash provided by operating activities
1,262,754
984,855
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities:
Net cash paid in acquisition of subsidiaries
(34,664
Purchases of other investments
(83,143
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
(5,006,227
(9,210,970
Sales of available-for-sale securities
4,214,075
7,990,270
Net cash used in investing activities
(875,295
(1,255,364
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities:
Dividend
Issue of shares, net
331,817
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(57,303
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
330,156
61,308
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period
729,296
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period
790,604
4
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Basis of Preparation and Consolidation
These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXIS Capital) and its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the Company) and have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and results of operations as at the end of and for the periods presented. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results for a full year. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The major estimates reflected in the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements include, but are not limited to, the reserve for losses and loss expenses, premium estimates for business written on a line slip or proportional basis and the estimation of fair values for contracts that meet the definition of derivatives under FAS 133. Some items in the financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period classification.
2. New Accounting Pronouncements
EITF Issue No. 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments was issued in late 2003. It contains two aspects that impact the Company. Firstly, it provides details regarding disclosures about unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt and equity securities accounted for under FASB Statements No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. These disclosures were effective in annual financial statements for fiscal years ended after December 15, 2003 and, accordingly, were provided in our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003. Secondly, it provides additional guidance for evaluating whether an investment is other-than-temporarily impaired. This guidance was scheduled to be effective for reporting periods beginning after June 30, 2004. However, the FASB has since determined that a delay in the effective date of these provisions was necessary until it can issue additional guidance on the application of EITF Issue No. 03-1. The Company will assess whether this guidance will have a material impact on the Companys results of operations or financial condition once it is released.
3. Stock-Based Compensation
On June 30, 2003, the FASB issued FAS No.148 Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure. FAS 148 amends FAS 123 to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, FAS 148 amends the existing disclosure to require more prominent disclosure in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based compensation and the
5
effect of the method used on reported results. The additional disclosure requirements are effective for fiscal quarters ended after December 15, 2002. The Company adopted FAS No. 123 effective January 1, 2003 by applying the prospective method permitted under FAS No. 148. Prior to 2003, the Company followed Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and related interpretations in accounting for its employee stock compensation. With respect to unvested restricted stock awards, the amount of deferred compensation is eliminated from share capital and additional paid in capital. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of FAS 123 to stock-based compensation prior to January 1, 2003.
Net income, as reported.
Add:
Stock-based employee compensation expense included in net income, net of related tax effects
3,511
2,073
11,598
6,305
Deduct:
Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based methods for all awards, net of related tax effects
(4,276
(3,543
(13,729
(10,786
Pro-forma net income
5,514
145,512
311,792
367,373
Net income per share:
Basic - as reported
Basic - pro forma
0.96
2.04
2.60
Diluted - as reported
Diluted - pro forma
0.03
0.89
1.87
2.43
4. Segment Information
The Companys business consists of four underwriting segments: global insurance, global reinsurance, U.S. insurance and U.S. reinsurance. The Company evaluates the performance of each underwriting segment based on underwriting results. Most business written by the Company has loss experience generally characterized as low frequency and high severity. This may result in volatility in both the Companys and an individual segments operating results and cash flows. With effect from January 1, 2004, the Company included the personnel expenses of its underwriters in general and administrative expenses; prior to that date, they were included in acquisition costs. Disclosures relating to prior periods have been restated to reflect this change. In addition, with effect from January 1, 2004, the Company allocated all of its general and administrative costs, except for its corporate expenses, to its underwriting segments. The Companys corporate costs include holding company costs necessary to support the Companys worldwide insurance and reinsurance operations and costs associated with operating as a publicly-traded company. Prior periods have not been restated to reflect the full allocation of general and administrative costs, as the Companys business segments were not fully operational throughout 2003. The Company does not allocate its assets by segment as it evaluates the underwriting results of each segment separately from the results of its investment portfolio.
6
Global Insurance
The Companys global insurance segment consists of specialty lines business sourced primarily outside of the U.S. but covering exposures throughout the world. In this segment, the Company offers clients tailored solutions in order to respond to their distinctive risk characteristics. Since most of the lines in this segment are for property and not for casualty coverage, the segment is principally short to medium tail business. This means that claims are generally made and settled earlier than in long tail business, which facilitates the Companys reserving process for this segment.
Global Reinsurance
The Companys global reinsurance segment consists of treaty reinsurance business sourced outside of the U.S. and underwritten in its Bermuda and Zurich offices. The Companys Bermuda office primarily sources business from clients outside of continental Europe whereas the Zurich office sources business from clients based in continental Europe. The Companys Bermuda-based portfolio consists of short tail severity driven products that principally cover property exposures. The Companys Zurich-based portfolio consists not only of short tail property exposures but also more medium tail exposures such as motor excess of loss and trade credit lines of business.
U.S. Insurance
The Companys U.S. insurance segment principally consists of specialty lines business sourced in the U.S. and primarily includes the following risk classifications: property, liability and professional lines.
U.S. Reinsurance
The Companys U.S. reinsurance segment principally consists of treaty reinsurance business sourced in the U.S. and focuses almost exclusively on exposures in the U.S. The underlying property and casualty business classes covered by the treaties written in the Companys U.S. reinsurance segment include: professional lines, liability, property, marine and aviation.
The following tables summarize the underwriting results, ratios and the reserves for losses and loss expenses for the four business segments as of and for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003.
7
Quarter ended September 30, 2004
GlobalInsurance
GlobalReinsurance
U.S.Reinsurance
Corporate
Total
Revenues:
214,282
163,837
227,380
82,201
Net premiums written
203,469
153,062
124,812
80,669
562,012
199,477
166,736
90,266
65,319
7,106
100
Expenses:
152,333
137,364
85,531
70,347
Acquisition costs
33,067
26,365
4,941
14,849
8,592
7,654
18,222
2,876
37,344
Underwriting profit (loss)
12,591
(4,547
(18,428
(22,753
(33,137
Corporate expenses
(10,193
Realized gains on investments
3,459
Ratios:
Net loss and loss expense ratio
76.4
%
82.4
94.7
107.7
85.4
Acquisition cost ratio
16.5
15.8
5.5
22.7
15.2
General and administrative expense ratio
4.3
4.6
20.2
4.4
2.0
9.1
Combined ratio
97.2
102.8
120.4
134.8
109.7
Reserve for losses and loss expenses as at September 30, 2004
805,364
499,961
711,181
206,728
n/a
8
Quarter ended September 30, 2003
U.S.Insurance
249,313
114,586
188,041
82,002
245,659
92,850
81,280
534,375
198,576
117,445
50,458
30,987
8,124
424
85,415
44,100
33,621
21,044
30,146
18,546
1,613
5,796
General and administrative expenses (1)
3,647
1,429
3,746
847
9,669
Underwriting profit
87,492
53,794
11,478
3,300
156,064
Corporate expenses (1)
(25,174
Realized losses on investments
4,574
43.0
37.5
66.6
67.9
46.3
3.2
18.7
14.1
General and administrative expense ratio (1)
1.8
1.2
7.4
2.7
6.3
8.8
60.0
54.5
77.2
89.3
69.2
Reserve for losses and loss expenses as at September 30, 2003
395,854
194,146
153,640
41,401
785,041
(1)For the quarter ended September 30, 2003, the Company did not allocate any of its general and administrative expenses, except for the personnel expenses of its underwriters.
9
Nine months ended September 30, 2004
730,878
722,796
595,637
311,831
619,248
698,112
323,241
308,478
1,949,079
595,761
465,000
247,837
170,851
6,887
763
368,476
246,542
182,271
148,736
89,530
69,651
7,477
35,016
24,047
20,986
49,927
8,072
103,032
120,595
128,584
8,162
(20,973
236,368
(29,016
(4,099
61.8
53.0
73.5
87.1
63.9
15.0
3.0
20.5
13.6
4.0
4.5
20.1
4.7
8.9
80.8
72.5
96.6
112.3
86.4
10
Nine months ended September 30, 2003
700,612
446,228
451,087
196,052
675,248
436,858
218,409
193,828
1,524,343
567,947
308,158
103,503
55,877
19,332
285,958
132,672
66,743
40,762
81,053
52,579
638
12,500
10,074
4,146
11,713
2,047
27,980
210,194
119,185
24,409
568
354,356
(68,471
19,316
50.3
43.1
64.5
72.9
50.8
14.3
17.1
0.6
22.4
14.2
1.7
1.3
11.3
3.6
6.6
9.3
66.3
61.5
98.9
74.3
(1)For the nine months ended September 30, 2003, the Company did not allocate any of its general and administrative expenses, except for the personnel expenses of its underwriters.
5. Securities Lending
The Company participates in a securities lending program whereby the Companys securities, which are included in investments, are loaned to third parties, primarily major brokerage firms. The Company maintains control over the securities it lends, retains the earnings and cash flows associated with the loaned securities and receives a fee from the borrower for the temporary use of the securities. Collateral in the form of cash, government securities and letters of credit is required at a rate of 102% of the market value of the loaned securities and is monitored and maintained by the lending agent. The Company had $748.8 million and $nil million in securities on loan at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.
6. Other Investments
The Company has invested $15.7 million in the senior preferred shares of a collateralized loan obligation, $42.4 million in combination notes of several collateralized loan obligations and $25.0 million in a medium term note representing an interest in a pool of European fixed income securities. The Company carries these investments at fair value, which currently approximates cost.
11
The collateral manager for the senior preferred shares investment is Blackstone Debt Advisors L.P., which is a related party as one of its affiliates beneficially owns more than 5% of the Companys common shares. The collateral manager is entitled to management fees payable by the collateralized loan obligation in the ordinary course of business. The Company does not have significant influence and does not participate in the management of this investment.
The underwriter for several collateralized loan obligations was Credit Suisse First Boston LLC, which is a related party as one of its affiliates beneficially owns more than 5% of the Companys common shares. The underwriter was entitled to organization and closing fees payable by the collateralized loan obligations in the ordinary course of business. The collateralized loan obligations are managed by third parties. The Company does not have significant influence and does not participate in the management of these investments.
7. Benefit Plans
The following table presents the components of the Companys defined benefit pension expense for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003.
September 30,2004
September 30,2003
($ in thousands)
Interest costs
161
483
Amortization of prior service costs
536
1,608
Total pension expense
697
2,091
8. Commitments and contingencies
On March 25, 2004, the Company renewed its credit facility by entering into a three-year $750 million credit facility with a syndicate of commercial banks led by JPMorgan Chase Bank, as administrative agent and lender. Under the terms of the new credit facility, up to $750 million may be used by the Company and its subsidiaries, AXIS Specialty Limited, AXIS Re Limited, AXIS Specialty Europe Limited, AXIS Reinsurance Company, AXIS Specialty Insurance Company and AXIS Surplus Insurance Company, to issue letters of credit and up to $300 million may be used by these entities for general corporate purposes, with total borrowings not to exceed $750 million. The credit facility contains various loan covenants with which the Company must comply, including limitations on the incurrence of future indebtedness, future liens, fundamental changes, investments and certain transactions with affiliates. The credit facility also requires that the Company maintain (1) a minimum amount of consolidated shareholders equity equal to or greater than the sum of $1.975 billion plus (A) 50% of consolidated net income for each fiscal quarter beginning with the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2005 and (B) 100% of the net cash proceeds received after March 25, 2004 from any issuance of our capital stock, and (2) a debt to total capitalization ratio not greater than 0.35:1.00. The credit facility contains restrictions on the Companys ability to make acquisitions, except that it may, among other things, acquire assets and entities in the insurance and reinsurance business for consideration in an aggregate amount not in excess of $250 million. The Companys ability to pay dividends or make other restricted payments is also limited, except that it may, among other things, pay cash dividends to shareholders in an
12
amount not exceeding $150 million for any fiscal year and it may repurchase shares of its capital stock for consideration in an aggregate amount not exceeding $500 million. There was no debt outstanding under the credit facility at September 30, 2004 or December 31, 2003. At September 30, 2004, the Company had letters of credit of $133.9 million outstanding under the credit facility. At December 31, 2003, the Company had letters of credit of $127.3 million outstanding under its then existing credit facility.
The Company has invested $15.7 million in the senior preferred shares of a collateralized loan obligation included in other investments. See note (6). In connection with this investment, the Company has commitments that may require additional funding of up to $9.3 million over the next two years.
9. Net income per share
The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
Net income per share -basic
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Net income per share -diluted
Share equivalents
Warrants
10,545,184
9,156,307
10,755,132
7,700,860
Options
2,220,416
1,922,944
2,270,654
1,585,807
Restricted stock
828,833
699,768
852,568
536,485
Weighted average common shares outstanding -diluted
13
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Business Overview
We underwrite insurance and reinsurance on a global basis. Our business consists of four segments: global insurance, global reinsurance, U.S. insurance and U.S. reinsurance. On July 7, 2003, we completed an initial public offering of 15.4 million newly issued common shares and 9.3 million common shares offered by selling shareholders. Net proceeds to the Company from the offering were $316.0 million and were credited to shareholders equity. In April 2004, we completed a secondary offering of 23.0 million common shares offered by selling shareholders. We did not sell any common shares in connection with this offering and did not receive any proceeds.
The markets in which we operate have historically been cyclical. During periods of excess underwriting capacity, as defined by availability of capital, competition can result in lower pricing and less favorable policy terms and conditions for insurers and reinsurers. During periods of reduced underwriting capacity, pricing and policy terms and conditions are generally more favorable. Historically, underwriting capacity has been impacted by several factors, including industry losses, catastrophes, changes in legal and regulatory guidelines, investment results and the ratings and financial strength of competitors. During 2003, many companies operating in our markets were recovering from the consequences of a prolonged period of excess underwriting capacity, which recovery generally produced favorable pricing, terms and conditions for the risks we underwrite. We believe that we are currently operating in a marketplace that generally continues to offer favorable pricing, terms and conditions in all of our business segments; however, there are many lines of business that have recently experienced less favorable pricing, terms and conditions. We believe that we will benefit from continued underwriting discipline by the market in most lines of business and from insurers seeking to move their business from insurers and reinsurers with legacy balance sheet issues and reserving shortfalls to financially stronger insurers and reinsurers.
We derive our revenues primarily from the sale of our insurance policies and reinsurance contracts. Insurance and reinsurance premiums are a function of the number and type of contracts we write, as well as prevailing market prices.
Renewal dates for our business segments depend upon the underlying line of business. For the majority of business in our global insurance and U.S. insurance segments, gross premiums are written throughout the year. An exception to this is the business written in our aviation and aviation war accounts, which is predominantly written in the last quarter of the calendar year. For our global reinsurance segment, a significant portion of our gross premiums is written in the first quarter of the calendar year, with the remainder primarily split between the second and third quarters. For the majority of business written in our U.S. reinsurance segment, gross premiums are written primarily in the first and third quarters of the calendar year.
Our premium income is supplemented by the income we generate from our investment portfolio. Our investment portfolio consists primarily of fixed income investments that are held as available for sale. Under U.S. GAAP, these investments are carried at fair market value and unrealized gains and losses on the investments are not included in our statement of operations. Rather, these unrealized gains and losses are included on our balance sheet in accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component of shareholders equity. Our current investment strategy seeks to preserve principal and maintain liquidity while trying to maximize investment return through a high-quality, diversified portfolio. The volatility of claims and the interest rate environment can affect the returns we generate on our investment portfolio.
14
Our expenses primarily consist of net losses and loss expenses, acquisition costs and general and administrative expenses. Net losses and loss expenses are managements best estimate of the ultimate cost of claims incurred during a reporting period. Many of our lines of business have loss experience characterized as low frequency and high severity, which may cause volatility in our results of operations from period to period. Also, we have substantial exposure to unexpected losses resulting from natural disasters, man-made catastrophes and other catastrophic events. The incidence and occurrence of such catastrophes are inherently unpredictable and our losses from catastrophes could be substantial. Although we attempt to manage our exposure to such events across the organization in a variety of ways, including transfer of risk to other reinsurers, a single catastrophic event could affect multiple business segments and the frequency or severity of a catastrophic event could exceed our estimates.
Acquisition costs relate to the fees, commissions and taxes paid to obtain business. Typically, these costs are based on a percentage of the premium written and will vary by each line of business that we underwrite. In addition, we offset commissions received on ceded premiums against acquisition costs.
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel and general operating expenses. With effect from January 1, 2004, we included the personnel expenses of our underwriters in general and administrative expenses; prior to that date, they were included in acquisition costs. Disclosures relating to prior periods have been restated to reflect this change. In addition, with effect from January 1, 2004, we allocated all of our general and administrative costs, except for corporate expenses, to our underwriting segments. Our corporate costs include holding company costs necessary to support our worldwide insurance and reinsurance operations and costs associated with operating as a publicly-traded company. Prior periods have not been restated to reflect the full allocation of general and administrative costs as our business segments were not fully operational throughout 2003. We do not allocate our assets by segment as we evaluate the underwriting results of each segment separately from the results of its investment portfolio.
Our ultimate objective as an insurance and reinsurance company is to generate superior returns on capital that appropriately reward us for the risks we assume and to grow revenue only when we deem the returns meet or exceed our requirements. To achieve this objective, we must be able to accurately assess the potential losses associated with the risks that we insure and reinsure across the organization, to manage our investment portfolio risk appropriately and to control acquisition costs and infrastructure throughout the organization. Two financial measures that are meaningful in analyzing our performance are return on equity and combined ratio. Our return on equity calculation is based on the level of net income generated from the average of the opening and closing shareholders equity during the period. The combined ratio is a formula used by insurance and reinsurance companies to relate net premiums earned during a period to net losses and loss expenses, acquisition costs and general and administrative expenses during a period. A combined ratio above 100% indicates that a company is incurring more in net losses and loss expenses, acquisition costs and general and administrative expenses than it is earning in net premiums. We consider the combined ratio an appropriate indicator of our underwriting performance, particularly given the short tail orientation of our overall portfolio of risks. The following table details our key performance indicators:
15
Annualized return on average equity
0.8
24.0
21.4
Because we have a limited operating history, period to period comparisons of our results of operations may not be meaningful and there may be volatility in both our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, the amount of premiums written with respect to any particular segment or line of business may vary from quarter to quarter and period to period as a result of changes in market conditions.
Acquisition History
On February 28, 2003, we completed the acquisition of Sheffield Insurance Corporation for $34.7 million and subsequently renamed it AXIS Surplus Insurance Company. At the time of purchase, Sheffield Insurance Corporation was licensed to write insurance in Illinois and Alabama and eligible to write surplus lines insurance in 39 states and the District of Columbia. In addition, we added a team of insurance professionals from Combined Specialty Group, Inc. In the first half of 2003, we acquired the renewal rights to a book of directors and officers liability insurance and related lines business written by the Financial Insurance Solutions (FIS) group of The Kemper Insurance Companies (Kemper) in exchange for an agreement to make an override payment. The override payment is based on a percentage of gross written premiums of all FIS accounts that are renewed by the Company. We purchased this company and agreed to acquire these rights as the foundation for commencing our U.S. insurance operations.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Companys critical accounting policies are discussed in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 26, 2004.
Results of Operations
Quarters ended September 30, 2004 and 2003
Premiums. In the quarter ended September 30, 2004, gross premiums written were $687.7 million compared with $633.9 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $53.8 million. The increase was generated by our global reinsurance segment, which experienced an increase in gross premiums written of $49.3 million, and our U.S. insurance segment, which experienced an increase in gross premiums written of $39.3 million. The increase in gross premiums written in our global reinsurance segment was partly due to new business written by our Zurich office and an increase in property pro rata gross premiums written. The increase in gross premiums written in our U.S. segment was primarily due to greater market penetration. The increases in gross premiums written were partially offset by a reduction of $35.0 million in gross premiums written by our global insurance segment. This reduction was partially due to a refinement in the method of estimating gross written premiums in our
16
property line of business that occurred in the quarter ended December 31, 2003. This refinement more closely aligned the Companys estimation and recording of gross premiums written with activity reported by ceding companies and increased gross premiums written for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. We expect the mix of business within and between our segments to change over time based on market conditions and our view of the long term profit potential of individual lines of business.
Premiums ceded for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 were $125.7 million compared with $99.6 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $26.1 million. Of this increase, approximately 38% related to additional protections purchased to reinstate coverages exhausted by losses from Hurricanes Charley, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne. We purchase reinsurance to reduce our exposure to risk of loss on some lines of business written primarily within our global insurance and U.S. insurance segments. The remaining increase in ceded premiums was generated primarily within these segments.
Net premiums earned for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 were $521.8 million compared with $397.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $124.3 million. Premiums are earned over the term of the policies in proportion to the risks to which they relate. As the level of net premiums written increases, the level of net premiums earned also increases. As we experienced an increase in net premiums written in all of our segments over the rolling twelve-month period ended September 30, 2004 compared to the rolling twelve-month period ended September 30, 2003, our net premiums earned increased.
Net Investment Income and Net Realized Gains/Losses. Net investment income, including realized gains/losses, for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 was $43.7 million compared with $13.6 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $30.1 million.
Net Investment Income. Net investment income for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 was $40.0 million compared with $19.3 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $20.7 million. This was due to a combination of higher investment balances and higher investment yields. Net investment income consisted primarily of interest on fixed income securities that was partially offset by net investment expenses of $1.8 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 compared with $1.6 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. The higher expenses were a result of an increase in our assets managed by external portfolio managers.
The annualized effective yield (calculated by dividing the net investment income generated from invested assets by the average balance of the assets managed by our portfolio managers) for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 was 3.5% compared with 2.6% for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. The increase in the effective yield was primarily due to higher U.S. interest rates. The yield may vary significantly from period to period due primarily to the timing of cash flows, changes in interest rates and changes in asset allocation.
Net Realized Gains/Losses. Net realized gains for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 were $3.7 million compared with net realized losses of $5.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, a increase of $9.4 million. We invest our portfolios to produce a total return. In assessing returns under this approach, we include investment income, realized gains and losses and unrealized gains and losses generated by the investment portfolios. As a result, there can be significant changes in the levels of our net realized gains/losses from quarter to quarter. Some of our mortgage-backed securities are required to be classified as derivatives; included within net realized gains was $0.3 million in realized gains and a negligible amount in unrealized losses relating to these securities.
The total return for our investment portfolio (calculated using beginning and ending market portfolio values, adjusted for external cash flows) for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 was 2.4%
17
compared with 0.3% for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. The total return for an investment portfolio consists of price and income return. These components are affected primarily by the timing of cash flows, changes in interest rates and changes in asset allocation. Our total return was higher during the quarter ended September 30, 2004 due to changes in U.S. interest rates that positively impacted prices of fixed income securities and higher investment yields.
Other Insurance Related Income. Other insurance related income for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 was $7.2 million compared with income of $8.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, a decrease of $1.3 million. This income related to the movement in the fair value of our insurance and reinsurance contracts that meet the definition of a derivative.
Net Losses and Loss Expenses. Net losses and loss expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 were $445.6 million compared to $184.2 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $261.4 million. The net loss and loss expense ratio for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 was 85.4% compared to 46.3% for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. The increase in net losses and loss expenses and the net loss and loss expense ratio was primarily driven by an active hurricane season. We incurred net losses and loss expenses of $227.4 million from Hurricanes Charley, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne, which swept across the Caribbean and South Eastern United States in August and September 2004. Our estimates for the losses incurred from these hurricanes were derived from formal loss advices, the output of industry models, a review of in-force contracts and preliminary indications from clients. Consequently, actual losses from these hurricanes may vary materially from estimated losses. During the quarter ended September 30, 2003, we did not experience any major catastrophe losses. The impact of the hurricane-related losses was partially mitigated by favorable prior period development of $49.6 million or 9.5 percentage points, compared to $31.2 million or 7.8 percentage points for the quarter ended September 30, 2003.
Acquisition Costs. Acquisition costs for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 were $79.2 million compared to $56.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $23.1 million. This increase primarily resulted from an increase in the volume of net premiums earned. The acquisition cost ratio for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 was 15.2% compared to 14.1% for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. The increase in the ratio was principally a result of higher amortized ceded premiums which reduced the level of net premiums earned. As a percentage of gross premiums earned, the level of acquisition costs was 12.1% for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 and 11.6% for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. With effect from January 1, 2004, we included the personnel expenses of our underwriters in general and administrative expenses; prior to that date, they were included in acquisition costs. Our disclosures for prior periods have been restated to reflect this change.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 were $47.5 million, compared to $34.8 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $12.7 million. This increase was primarily driven by the establishment and expansion of operations in the U.S. and Europe. In addition, we incurred $1.5 million of fees in connection with our preparation for compliance with section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The general and administrative expense ratio for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 was 9.1% compared to 8.8% for the quarter ended September 30, 2003.
Foreign Exchange. Our functional currency is the U.S. dollar; however, some of our business is written in other currencies. For the quarter ended September 30, 2004, we experienced a gain of $3.5 million compared to $4.6 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, a decrease of $1.1 million. The gain was principally attributable to asset balances denominated in Euros following an increase in the level of gross premiums written in this currency in our global reinsurance segment.
18
Income Tax (Expense) Recovery. The income tax recovery for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 was $2.4 million compared to an expense of $2.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 a decrease of $4.5 million. The income tax recovery of $2.4 million was driven by our U.S. operations which sustained net losses from Hurricanes Charley, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne.
Net Income. Net income for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 was $6.3 million compared to $147.0 million, a decrease of $140.7 million. Net income for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 consisted of a net underwriting loss of $43.3 million, net investment income and net realized gains of $43.7 million, foreign exchange gains of $3.5 million and tax recovery of $2.4 million. Net income for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 consisted of net underwriting income of $130.9 million, net investment income and net realized gains of $13.6 million, foreign exchange gains of $4.6 million and a tax expense of $2.1 million.
Comprehensive Income. Comprehensive income for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 was $60.5 million compared to $148.9 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, a decrease of $88.4 million. Comprehensive income represents net income adjusted for changes in the unrealized position in our investment portfolio. For the quarter ended September 30, 2004, we experienced an increase of $54.2 million in the unrealized position in our investment portfolio compared to an increase of $1.9 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2003.
Nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003
Premiums. In the nine months ended September 30, 2004, gross premiums written were $2,361.1 million compared with $1,794.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $567.1 million. Of this increase, 48.8% was generated by our global reinsurance segment, 25.5% by our U.S. insurance segment, 20.4% by our U.S. reinsurance segment and 5.3% by our global insurance segment. The increase in gross premiums written in our global reinsurance segment was primarily driven by our expansion into continental Europe in November 2003. The increases in gross premiums written in our U.S. segments were primarily due to greater market penetration and our ability to participate fully in the first quarters renewal season. We expect the mix of business within and between our segments to change over time based on market conditions and our view of the long term profit potential of individual lines of business.
Premiums ceded for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 were $412.1 million compared with $269.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $142.5 million. We purchase reinsurance to reduce our exposure to risk of loss on some lines of business written primarily within our global insurance and U.S. insurance segments. The increase in ceded premiums was generated primarily within these segments.
Net premiums earned for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 were $1,479.4 million compared with $1,035.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $443.9 million. Premiums are earned over the term of the policies in proportion to the risks to which they relate. As the level of net premiums written increases, the level of net premiums earned also increases. As we experienced an increase in net premiums written in all of our segments over the rolling twelve-month period ended September 30, 2004 compared to the rolling twelve-month period ended September 30, 2003, our net premiums earned increased.
Net Investment Income and Net Realized Gains. Net investment income, including realized gains, for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was $114.0 million compared with $67.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $46.2 million.
19
Net Investment Income. Net investment income for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was $104.6 million compared with $46.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $58.0 million. This was due to a combination of higher investment balances and higher investment yields. The 2003 amount also included an additional charge to the amortization expense on our mortgage-backed securities portfolio. Net investment income consisted primarily of interest on fixed income securities that was partially offset by net investment expenses of $5.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared with $4.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The higher expenses were a result of an increase in our assets managed by external portfolio managers.
The annualized effective yield (calculated by dividing the net investment income generated from invested assets by the average balance of the assets managed by our portfolio managers) for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was 3.3% compared with 2.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The increase in the effective yield was primarily due to higher U.S. interest rates. The 2003 yield also was reduced by the additional charge to the amortization expense on our mortgage-backed securities portfolio. The yield may vary significantly from period to period due primarily to the timing of cash flows, changes in interest rates and changes in asset allocation.
Net Realized Gains. Net realized gains for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 were $9.4 million compared with $21.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, a decrease of $11.8 million. We invest our portfolios to produce a total return. In assessing returns under this approach, we include investment income, realized gains and losses and unrealized gains and losses generated by the investment portfolios. As a result, there can be significant changes in the levels of our net realized gains (losses) from quarter to quarter. Some of our mortgage-backed securities are required to be classified as derivatives; included within net realized gains was $0.2 million in realized gains and a negligible amount in unrealized losses relating to these securities.
The total return for our investment portfolio (calculated using beginning and ending market portfolio values, adjusted for external cash flows) for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was 2.7% compared with 3.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The total return for an investment portfolio consists of price and income return. These components are primarily affected by the timing of cash flows, changes in interest rates and changes in asset allocation. Our total return was lower in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 due to an increase in U.S. interest rates, which negatively impacted fixed income security prices; this was partially mitigated by higher investment yields.
Other Insurance Related Income. Other insurance related income for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was $7.7 million compared with income of $19.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, a decrease of $12.1 million. This income related to the movement in the fair value of our insurance and reinsurance contracts that meet the definition of a derivative.
Net Losses and Loss Expenses. Net losses and loss expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 were $946.0 million compared to $526.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $419.9 million. The net loss and loss expense ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was 63.9% compared to 50.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The increase in net losses and loss expenses and the net loss and loss expense ratio was primarily driven by an active hurricane season. We incurred net losses and loss expenses of $227.4 million from Hurricanes Charley, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne, which swept across the Caribbean and South Eastern United States in August and September 2004. Our estimates for the losses incurred from these hurricanes were derived from formal loss advices, the output of industry models, a review of in-force contracts and preliminary indications from clients. Consequently, actual losses from these hurricanes may
20
vary materially from estimated losses. During the nine months ended September 30, 2003, we did not experience a major loss as a result of hurricane activity. The impact of the hurricane-related losses was partially mitigated by favorable prior period development of $141.4 million, or 9.6 percentage points, compared to $51.8 million, or 5.0 percentage points, for the nine months ended September 30, 2003.
Acquisition Costs. Acquisition costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 were $201.7 million compared to $146.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $54.9 million. This increase was primarily a result of the increase in the volume of net premiums earned. The acquisition cost ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was 13.6% compared to 14.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. This decrease resulted primarily from the effects of a change in business mix; our U.S. insurance segment, which began underwriting in 2003, has a lower acquisition cost ratio than our other segments due to the receipt of ceding commissions on some outward reinsurance contracts that are recorded as an offset to acquisition costs. With effect from January 1, 2004, we included the personnel expenses of our underwriters in general and administrative expenses; prior to that date, they were included in acquisition costs. Our disclosures for prior periods have been restated to reflect this change.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 were $132.0 million compared to $96.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $35.5 million. This increase was primarily driven by the establishment and expansion of operations in the U.S. and Europe. In addition, we incurred $2.9 million of fees in connection with our preparation for compliance with section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The general and administrative expense ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was 8.9% compared to 9.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The reduction in the ratio was caused by an increase in the volume of net premiums earned.
Foreign Exchange. Our functional currency is the U.S. dollar; however, some of our business is written in other currencies. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, we experienced a loss of $4.1 million compared to a gain of $19.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, a decrease of $23.4 million. This decrease was principally attributable to asset balances denominated in Euros following an increase in the level of gross premiums written in this currency in our global reinsurance segment.
Income Tax Expense. The income tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was $3.4 million compared to $1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $2.3 million.
Net Income. Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was $313.9 million compared to $371.9 million, a decrease of $58.0 million. Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 consisted of net underwriting income of $207.4 million, net investment income and net realized gains of $114.0 million, foreign exchange losses of $4.1 million and tax expense of $3.4 million. Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 consisted of net underwriting income of $285.9 million, net investment income and net realized gains of $67.8 million, foreign exchange gains of $19.3 million and an overall tax expense of $1.1 million.
Comprehensive Income. Comprehensive income for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was $311.8 million compared to $386.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, a decrease of $74.2 million. Comprehensive income represents net income adjusted for changes in the unrealized position in our investment portfolio. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, we experienced a decrease of $2.2 million in the unrealized position in our investment portfolio compared to an increase of $14.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2003.
21
Underwriting Results by Segment
Our business consists of four underwriting segments: global insurance, global reinsurance, U.S. insurance and U.S. reinsurance.
We evaluate the performance of each underwriting segment based on underwriting results. With effect from January 1, 2004, we included the personnel expenses of our underwriters in general and administrative expenses; prior to that date, they were included in acquisition costs. Disclosures relating to prior periods have been restated to reflect this change. In addition, with effect from January 1, 2004, we allocated all of our general and administrative costs, except for corporate expenses, to our underwriting segments. Our corporate costs include holding company costs necessary to support our worldwide insurance and reinsurance operations and costs associated with operating as a publicly-traded company. We have not restated prior periods to reflect the full allocation of general and administrative costs as our business segments were not fully operational throughout 2003. We do not allocate our assets by segment as we evaluate the underwriting results of each segment separately from the results of our investment portfolio.
Our global insurance segment principally consists of specialty lines business sourced outside of the U.S. but covering exposures throughout the world. In this segment, we offer clients tailored solutions in order to respond to their distinctive risk characteristics. Since most of the lines in this segment are for physical damage and related perils and not for liability coverage, the segment is principally short to medium tail business. This means that claims are generally made and settled earlier than in long tail business, which facilitates our reserving process for this segment.
Quarters ended September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003
The following table summarizes the underwriting results and ratios for the quarters ended September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003:
Quarter endedSeptember 30,2004
Quarter endedSeptember 30,2003
Change
(35,031
(42,190
901
(1,018
66,918
2,921
4,945
(74,901
33.4
2.5
37.2
22
(1)For the quarter ended September 30, 2004, we did not allocate any of our general and administrative expenses, except for the personnel expenses of our underwriters; therefore, the general and administrative amounts and expense ratios for the two periods are not comparable.
Premiums. In the quarter ended September 30, 2004, gross premiums written were $214.3 million compared to $249.3 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, a decrease of $35.0 million. The table below shows gross premiums written by line of business:
Marine
15,884
16,257
Onshore and Offshore Energy
43,173
56,569
Aviation and Aerospace
38,646
32,162
Property
38,634
74,267
Specialty Risks
77,945
70,058
During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, gross premiums written decreased by 14.1% compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2003. The reduction was partially due to a refinement in the method of estimating gross written premiums in our property line of business that occurred in the quarter ended December 31, 2003. This refinement more closely aligned the Companys estimation and recording of gross premiums written with activity reported by ceding companies and increased gross premiums written for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. Our marine book experienced a 2.3% decrease in gross premiums written over the quarter ended September 30, 2003. This resulted from a reduction in the level of marine hull gross premiums written due to rating deficiencies, offset by an increase in cargo specie gross premiums written following the recruitment of an underwriting team in the second quarter of 2004. Our onshore and offshore energy lines of business experienced a decrease in gross premiums written of 23.7%. The decrease was caused by rate reductions as well as by the shift of a major renewal to 2005. Our specialty risks book experienced an increase of 11.3% driven largely by $12.5 million of directors and officers gross premiums written, which we began writing in the second half of 2003.
Premiums ceded for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 were $10.8 million compared to $3.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $7.1 million. The increase was primarily due to the purchase of additional reinsurance protections to mitigate volatility as our portfolio grows.
The following table shows the derivation of net premiums earned for the quarters ended September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003:
Gross premiums earned
225,026
217,578
Ceded premiums amortized
(25,549)
(19,002)
23
Gross premiums are earned over the period of the insured risk. Consequently, the level of gross premiums earned has increased as the level of gross premiums written has increased.
Ceded premiums are amortized over the contract term. Consequently, the level of amortized ceded premium has increased in 2004 as premiums ceded in 2003 continue to be amortized in 2004.
Other Insurance Related Income. Other insurance related income was $7.1 million compared to $8.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, a decrease of $1.0 million. Other insurance related income related to the movement in the fair value of our insurance contracts that meet the definition of a derivative. These contracts typically insure a portfolio of sovereign debt securities against the risk of default.
Net Losses and Loss Expenses. Net losses and loss expenses were $152.3 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 compared to $85.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $66.9 million. The following table shows the components of net losses and loss expenses incurred:
Losses paid
30,003
12,082
Change in reported case reserves
3,043
10,560
Change in IBNR
124,027
67,773
Reinsurance recoveries
(4,740
(5,000
The net loss and loss expense ratio for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 was 76.4% compared to 43.0% for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, we incurred $61.1 million or 30.6 percentage points of net losses and loss expenses from Hurricanes Charley, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne. These losses occurred in our property, energy and marine books of business. Our estimates for the losses incurred from these Hurricanes were derived from formal loss advices, the output of industry models, a review of in-force contracts and preliminary indications from clients. Consequently, actual losses from these Hurricanes may vary materially from estimated losses. During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, we experienced positive prior period development of $16.6 million or 8.3 percentage points. This was derived primarily from our 2003 accident year on our onshore energy, aviation war and property books of business. We primarily use the Bornhuetter-Ferguson method to estimate the ultimate cost of losses; it takes as a starting point an assumed ultimate loss and loss expense ratio and blends in the loss and loss expense ratio implied by the experience to date. During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, actual claims were less than expected for our 2003 accident year resulting in favorable loss development. During the quarter ended September 30, 2003, we experienced favorable development of $9.3 million on our 2002 accident year, which generated a 4.7 percentage point reduction in the net loss ratio.
Acquisition Costs. Acquisition costs for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 were $33.1 million compared to $30.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $3.0 million. The acquisition cost ratio for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 was 16.5% compared with 15.2% for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. The increase in the acquisition cost ratio was a result of higher amortized ceded premium, which reduced the level of net premiums earned. As a
24
percentage of gross premiums earned, the level of acquisition costs was 14.7% for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 and 13.9% for the quarter ended September 30, 2003.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 were $8.6 million compared to $3.6 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $5.0 million. The general and administrative expenses ratio for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 was 4.3% compared with 1.8% for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. As we did not allocate any of our general and administrative expenses, except for the personnel expenses of our underwriters, prior to January 1, 2004, these amounts and ratios are not comparable.
Nine months ended September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003
The following table summarizes the underwriting results and ratios for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003:
Nine monthsendedSeptember 30,2004
Nine monthsendedSeptember 30,2003
30,266
(56,000)
27,814
(12,445
82,518
8,477
13,973
(89,599
11.5
0.7
2.3
14.5
(1)For the nine months ended September 30, 2003, we did not allocate any of our general and administrative expenses, except for the personnel expenses of our underwriters; therefore, the general and administrative amounts and expense ratios for the two periods are not comparable.
Premiums. In the nine months ended September 30, 2004, gross premiums written were $730.9 million compared to $700.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $30.3 million. The table below shows gross premiums written by line of business:
25
78,029
75,225
156,326
173,624
93,217
85,012
115,650
135,436
287,656
231,315
During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, gross premiums written increased by 4.3% compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The increase in gross premiums written was primarily driven by our specialty risks line of business, which generated an increase of $56.3 million in gross premiums written. This was partly due to an increase in the level of political risk gross premiums written of $24.1 million following a rise in the level of direct foreign investment in the first quarter of 2004 and increased targeting of this business. Our aviation war gross premiums written increased $8.7 million due primarily to increased participations on renewed business and new business. In addition, we generated gross premiums written of $27.0 million on our directors and officers line of business, which we began to write in the second half of 2003. Gross premiums written in our property line of business decreased $19.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The reduction was partially due to a refinement in the method of estimating gross written premiums that occurred in the quarter ended December 31, 2003. This refinement more closely aligned the Companys estimation and recording of gross premiums written with activity reported by ceding companies and increased gross premiums written for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The reduction in the level of gross premiums written of $17.3 million in our onshore and offshore energy book was due to some rate reductions and a movement in renewal dates on some large accounts.
Premiums ceded for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 were $111.6 million compared to $25.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $86.2 million. The increase was primarily due to the timing of the renewal of a contract that originally had a sixteen month coverage period. In addition, we have increased the level of reinsurance purchased in order to mitigate volatility in losses as our portfolio grows.
The following table shows the derivation of net premiums earned for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003:
672,182
618,231
(76,421
(50,284
26
Other Insurance Related Income. Other insurance related income was $6.9 million compared to $19.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, a decrease of $12.4 million. Other insurance related income related to the movement in the fair value of our insurance contracts that meet the definition of a derivative. These contracts typically insure a portfolio of sovereign debt securities against the risk of default.
Net Losses and Loss Expenses. Net losses and loss expenses were $368.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to $286.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $82.5 million. The following table shows the components of net losses and loss expenses incurred:
67,891
39,457
46,521
65,960
277,710
195,362
(23,646
(14,821
The net loss and loss expense ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was 61.8% compared to 50.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, we incurred $61.1 million of net losses and loss expenses from Hurricanes Charley, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne. These losses occurred in our property, energy and marine books of business. Our estimates for the losses incurred from these hurricanes were derived from formal loss advices, the output of industry models, a review of in-force contracts and preliminary indications from clients. Consequently, actual losses from these hurricanes may vary materially from estimated losses. During the nine months ended September 30, 2003, we incurred a significant loss on our property book of business of $45.5 million, net of reinsurance recoveries. The losses relating to the hurricanes added 10.3 percentage points to our net loss ratio, compared to 8.0 percentage points relating to the property loss. During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, we experienced favorable development on our prior accident years of $68.6 million, which effected a reduction in the net loss ratio of 11.5 percentage points. This reduction was largely generated by our property, terrorism, energy and aviation lines of business. We primarily use the Bornhuetter-Ferguson method to estimate the ultimate cost of losses; it takes as a starting point an assumed ultimate loss and loss expense ratio and blends in the loss and loss expense ratio implied by the experience to date. During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, actual claims were less than expected for our 2003 accident year resulting in favorable loss development. During the nine months ended September 30, 2003, we experienced favorable development of $23.6 million on our 2002 accident year, which generated a 4.2 percentage point reduction in the net loss ratio.
27
Acquisition Costs. Acquisition costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 were $89.5 million compared to $81.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $8.4 million. The acquisition cost ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was 15.0% compared with 14.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The increase in the acquisition cost ratio was a result of higher amortized reinsurance costs, which reduced the level of net premiums earned. As a percentage of gross premiums earned, the level of acquisition costs was 13.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to 13.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 were $24.0 million compared to $10.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of 13.9 million. The general and administrative expenses ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was 4.0% compared with 1.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. As we did not allocate any of our general and administrative expenses, except for the personnel expenses of our underwriters, prior to January 1, 2004, these amounts and ratios are not comparable.
Our global reinsurance segment consists of treaty reinsurance business sourced outside of the U.S. and underwritten in our Bermuda and Zurich offices. Our Bermuda office primarily sources business from clients based outside continental Europe whereas our Zurich office sources business from clients based in continental Europe. Our Bermuda based portfolio consists of short tail severity driven products that principally cover property exposures. Our Zurich-based portfolio consists not only of short tail property exposures but also more medium tail exposures such as motor excess of loss and trade credit lines of business. As the majority of this segments business is short tail in nature, it typically allows us to determine the ultimate loss experience within a relatively short period of time after a contract has expired.
28
49,251
38,476
49,291
(324
93,264
7,819
6,225
Underwriting (loss) profit
58,341
44.9
0.0
General and administrative expenses ratio (1)
3.4
48.3
(1) For the quarter ended September 30, 2003, we did not allocate any of our general and administrative expenses, except for the personnel expenses of our underwriters; therefore, the general and administrative amounts and expense ratios for the two periods are not comparable.
Premiums. In the quarter ended September 30, 2004, gross premiums written were $163.8 million compared to $114.6 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $49.2 million. The table below shows gross premiums written by line of business:
Catastrophe
57,263
62,401
Property Pro Rata
51,466
20,097
Property Per Risk
43,730
31,707
Credit and Bond
4,820
Motor and General Liability
3,276
Other
3,282
381
During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, our gross premiums written increased by 43.0% compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2003. The increase in gross premiums written was primarily
29
generated in our property pro-rata and property per risk lines of business. The new lines of business, credit and bond and motor and general liability, are written through our Zurich office, which was established in late 2003.
Our catastrophe line of business experienced a decrease in gross premiums written of $5.1 million. Although we derived $9.8 million of gross premiums from reinstated catastrophe covers following losses caused by Hurricanes Charley, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne we declined to renew some contracts where terms and conditions became unacceptable. This was most prevalent in our workers compensation catastrophe business.
Property pro rata gross premiums written increased by $31.4 million, primarily due to adjustments on pre-existing contracts following a review of estimated premiums and the development of actual premium data. Property per risk gross premiums written increased by $12.0 million due to an increase in the number of contracts written.
Premiums ceded for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 were $10.8 million of which $6.1 million or 56.5% related to reinstatement premiums on coverages exhausted by losses from Hurricanes Charley, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne. For the quarter ended September 30, 2003, there were no premiums ceded. Our global reinsurance segment purchases coverages to provide reinsurance protection against a large industry loss or series of losses.
181,017
120,235
(14,281
(2,790
Gross premiums are earned over the period of the reinsured risk. Consequently, the level of gross premiums earned has increased as the level of gross premiums written has increased.
Other Insurance Related Income. Other insurance related income was $0.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 compared to $0.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, a decrease of $0.3 million. The income related to the movement in the fair value of a reinsurance contract that meets the definition of a derivative.
Net Losses and Loss Expenses. Net losses and loss expenses were $137.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 compared to $44.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $93.3 million. The following table shows the components of net losses and loss expenses incurred:
30
27,548
7,437
58,396
9,053
123,920
27,610
(72,500
The net loss and loss expense ratio for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 was 82.4% compared to 37.5% for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. The increase in the net loss and loss expense ratio was primarily due to the impact of Hurricanes Charley, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne for which we incurred net losses and loss expenses of $91.6 million or 55.0 percentage points. During the quarter ended September 30, 2003, our loss experience benefited from the lack of major catastrophes. Our estimates for the losses incurred from these hurricanes were derived from formal loss advices, the output of industry models, a review of in-force contracts and preliminary indications from clients. Consequently, actual losses from these hurricanes may vary materially from estimated losses. Our gross losses were reduced by $72.5 million of reinsurance recoveries that were triggered by the occurrence of a series of large industry loss events. This reinsurance has predetermined industry loss triggers, based on the size of industry losses calculated by independent third parties. Our assessment, based on a combination of public information, our own assessment of each loss and historical development factors, is that these trigger points have been exceeded. However, not all of the industry loss numbers have been reported, and actual reinsurance recoveries could be materially reduced. During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, we experienced positive prior period development of $27.4 million or 16.4 percentage points on our 2003 accident year. We primarily use the Bornhuetter-Ferguson method to estimate the ultimate cost of losses; it takes as a starting point an assumed ultimate loss and loss expense ratio and blends in the loss and loss expense ratio implied by the experience to date. During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, actual claims were less than expected for our 2003 accident year resulting in favorable loss development. Our global reinsurance segment has loss experience categorized as low frequency but high severity in nature and, therefore, our loss experience can be volatile. During the quarter ended September 30, 2003, we experienced positive prior period development of $21.9 million or 18.6 percentage points on our 2002 accident year.
Acquisition Costs. Acquisition costs for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 were $26.4 million compared to $18.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $7.9 million. The acquisition cost ratio for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 was 15.8% compared with 15.8% for the quarter ended September 30, 2003.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 were $7.7 million compared to $1.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $6.3 million. The general and administrative expenses ratio for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 was 4.6% compared with 1.2% for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. As we did not allocate any of our general and administrative expenses, except for the personnel expenses of our underwriters, prior to January 1, 2004, these amounts and ratios are not comparable.
31
276,568
261,254
156,842
339
113,870
17,072
16,840
9,399
9.9
(2.1
)%
11.0
(1) For the nine months ended September 30, 2003, we did not allocate any of our general and administrative expenses, except for the personnel expenses of our underwriters; therefore, the general and administrative amounts and expense ratios for the two periods are not comparable.
Premiums. In the nine months ended September 30, 2004, gross premiums written were $722.8 million compared to $446.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $276.6 million. The table below shows gross premiums written by line of business:
388,759
321,532
119,145
66,564
78,385
45,999
72,660
48,937
14,910
12,133
32
During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, our gross premiums written increased by 62.0% compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2003. This was primarily due to our expansion into continental Europe and an increase in catastrophe business. During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, our Zurich office generated $195.9 million of gross premiums written, writing catastrophe, property pro rata and property per risk and three new lines of business: credit and bond; motor; and general liability. The majority of the credit and bond business was whole-turnover trade credit, which effectively provides protection for receivable balances. Losses are generally triggered by the insolvency of the debtor. Our motor portfolio consists of excess of loss coverage for third party liability and property damage. The increase in our catastrophe gross premiums written was driven by a trend toward counterparty diversification in our target markets, thereby enabling us to participate on a greater number of programs than in the prior year; this offset some moderate rate reductions and instances where we declined to renew contracts because terms and conditions became unacceptable. This was most prevalent in our workers compensation catastrophe business. The increase in our property pro rata and property per risk gross premiums written was primarily due to an increase in the number of contracts written. In addition, property pro rata premiums increased due to adjustments on pre-existing contracts following a review of estimated premiums and the development of actual premium data.
Premiums ceded for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 were $24.7 million compared to $9.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $15.3 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, $6.1 million or 24.7% related to reinstatement premiums on coverages exhausted by losses from Hurricanes Charley, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne. Our global reinsurance segment purchases coverages to provide reinsurance protection against a large industry loss or series of losses.
483,772
314,711
(18,772
(6,553
Other Insurance Related Income. Other insurance related income was $0.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to $0.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $0.4 million. The income related to the movement in the fair value of a reinsurance contract that meets the definition of a derivative.
Net Losses and Loss Expenses. Net losses and loss expenses were $246.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to $132.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $113.8 million. The following table shows the components of net losses and loss expenses incurred:
33
47,111
22,013
54,581
7,378
217,350
103,281
The net loss and loss expense ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was 53.0% compared to 43.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The increase in the net loss and loss expense ratio was primarily due to the impact of Hurricanes Charley, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne from which we incurred net losses and loss expenses of $91.6 million or 19.7 percentage points. During the nine months ended September 30, 2003, our loss experience benefited from the lack of major catastrophes. Our estimates for the losses incurred for these hurricanes were derived from formal loss advices, the output of industry models, a review of in-force contracts and preliminary indications from clients. Consequently, actual losses from these hurricanes may vary materially from estimated losses. Our gross losses were reduced by $72.5 million of reinsurance recoveries that were triggered by the occurrence of a series of large industry loss events. This reinsurance has predetermined industry loss triggers, based on the size of industry losses calculated by independent third parties. Our assessment, based on a combination of public information, our own assessment of each loss and historical development factors, is that these trigger points have been exceeded. However, not all of the industry loss numbers have been reported, and actual reinsurance recoveries could be materially reduced. During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, we experienced positive prior period development of $60.2 million or 12.9 percentage points on our 2003 accident year. We primarily use the Bornhuetter-Ferguson method to estimate the ultimate cost of losses; it takes as a starting point an assumed ultimate loss and loss expense ratio and blends in the loss and loss expense ratio implied by the experience to date. During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, actual claims were less than expected for our 2003 accident year resulting in favorable loss development. During the nine months ended September 30, 2003, we experienced favorable development of $28.2 million on our 2002 underwriting year, which generated a 9.2 percentage point reduction in the net loss ratio. Our global reinsurance segment has loss experience categorized as low frequency but high severity in nature and, therefore, our loss experience can be volatile.
Acquisition Costs. Acquisition costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 were $69.7 million compared to $52.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $17.1 million. The acquisition cost ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was 15.0% compared with 17.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in the level of commissions incurred.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 were $21.0 million compared to $4.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $16.9 million. The general and administrative expenses ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was 4.5% compared with 1.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. As we did not allocate any of our general and administrative expenses, except for the personnel expenses of our underwriters, prior to January 1, 2004, these amounts and ratios are not comparable.
34
Our U.S. insurance segment principally consists of specialty lines business sourced in the U.S. and includes the following risk classifications: property, liability and professional lines.
39,339
31,962
39,808
51,910
3,328
14,476
(29,906
28.1
General and administrative expense ratio(1)
12.8
43.2
Premiums. In the quarter ended September 30, 2004, gross premiums written were $227.4 million compared to $188.0 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $39.4 million. The table below shows gross premiums written by line of business:
100,590
77,070
Liability
61,889
43,475
Professional Lines
64,901
67,496
Gross premiums written for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 increased by 20.9%. This was primarily driven by an increase in the level of underwriting staff and increased marketing efforts.
35
Our property book generated gross premiums written of $100.6 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2004, an increase of 30.5% over the quarter ended September 30, 2003. This was primarily due to three reasons: firstly, we introduced a new product line in mid-2003; secondly, we increased the number of States in which we were able to write business on an admitted basis; and thirdly, we increased our market penetration.
Our liability book generated gross premiums written of $61.9 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2004, an increase of 42.4% over the quarter ended September 30, 2003. This was primarily driven by an increase in our maximum line size for our umbrella and excess coverages, which enabled our underwriters to access more business.
Our professional lines book gross premiums written declined by $2.6 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2004, a decrease of 3.8% over the quarter ended September 30, 2003. This was primarily driven by the fact that following the acquisition of the renewal rights of a book of directors and officers liability insurance and related lines of business written by the FIS group of Kemper on February 17, 2003, we cancelled and rewrote a number of policies that generated gross premiums written of $4.2 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2003. Consequently, these policies did not renew in the quarter ended September 30, 2004, but instead renewed on their original renewal dates. In addition, we declined to renew some contracts where rates did not meet our targeted levels.
Premiums ceded for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 were $102.6 million compared to $95.2 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $7.4 million. Our U.S. insurance segment purchases significant proportional and excess of loss reinsurance on both a treaty and facultative basis that is designed to reduce the volatility in our severity driven classes of business. As a result, as the total of our gross premiums written increases so does the total of premiums ceded.
The following table shows the derivation of net premiums earned:
179,714
112,588
(89,448
(62,130
Ceded premiums are amortized over the contract term. Consequently, the level of ceded premiums amortized has increased in 2004 as premiums ceded in 2003 continued to be amortized in 2004.
Net Losses and Loss Expenses. Net losses and loss expenses were $85.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 compared to $33.6 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $51.9 million. This segment purchases significant reinsurance coverage, therefore, we have recorded reinsurance recoveries in our incurred but not reported loss reserves. The following table shows the components of net losses and loss expenses incurred:
36
10,137
467
117,217
7,920
185,260
70,256
(227,083
(45,022
The net loss and loss expense ratio for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 was 94.7% compared to 66.6% for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. The increase in the net loss and loss expense ratio was primarily due to the impact of Hurricanes Charley, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne from which we incurred net losses and loss expenses of $47.6 million or 52.7 percentage points. Our estimates for the losses incurred for these hurricanes were derived from formal loss advices, the output of industry models, a review of in-force contracts and preliminary indications from clients. Consequently, actual losses from these hurricanes may vary materially from estimated losses. During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, we experienced positive prior period development of $4.6 million or 5.0 percentage points generated on our 2003 accident year property account. We primarily use the Bornhuetter-Ferguson method to estimate the ultimate cost of losses; it takes as a starting point an assumed loss and loss expense ratio and blends in the loss and loss expense ratio implied by our experience to date. During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, actual claims were less than expected for our 2003 accident year property account resulting in favorable loss development.
Acquisition Costs. Acquisition costs for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 were $4.9 million compared to $1.6 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $3.3 million. The acquisition cost ratio for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 was 5.5% compared to 3.2% for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. The increase in acquisition costs was primarily due to a reduction on the level of commissions received on ceded premiums, which are offset against acquisition costs. During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, these commissions were $20.8 million, which had a positive impact on the acquisition cost ratio of 23.0 percentage points compared to $14.3 million and 28.4 percentage points for the quarter ended September 30, 2003.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 were $18.2 million compared to $3.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $14.5 million. The general and administrative expenses ratio for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 was 20.2% compared with 7.4% for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. As we did not allocate any of our general and administrative expenses, except for the personnel expenses of our underwriters, prior to January 1, 2004, these amounts and ratios are not comparable.
37
Nine monthsSeptember 30,2004
Nine monthsSeptember 30,2003
144,550
104,832
144,334
115,528
6,839
38,214
(16,247
9.0
2.4
Premiums. In the nine months ended September 30, 2004, gross premiums written were $595.6 million compared to $451.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $144.5 million. The table below shows gross premiums written by line of business:
234,782
156,933
171,706
113,106
189,149
181,048
Gross premiums written for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 increased by 32.0%. This was primarily driven by an increase in the level of underwriting staff and increased marketing efforts.
38
Our property book generated gross premiums written of $234.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2004, an increase of 49.6% over the nine months ended September 30, 2003. This was primarily due to four reasons: firstly, we introduced a new product line in mid-2003; secondly, we increased our maximum line sizes, which enabled our underwriters to access more business; thirdly, we increased the number of States in which we were able to write business on an admitted basis; and fourthly, we increased our market penetration.
Our liability book generated gross premiums written of $171.7 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2004, an increase of 51.8% over the nine months ended September 30, 2003. This was primarily driven by an increase in our maximum line size for our umbrella and excess coverages, which enabled our underwriters to access more business and increase market penetration.
Our professional lines book generated gross premiums written of $189.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2004, an increase of 4.5% over the nine months ended September 30, 2003. This was primarily driven by the fact that we did not acquire the renewal rights of a book of directors and officers liability insurance and related lines of business written by the FIS group of Kemper until February 17, 2003. Included within the gross premiums written for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 was $55.3 million relating to the cancel/rewrite process that followed the acquisition of the renewal rights. As the rates for directors and officers liability insurance have decreased, we have declined to renew some contracts where rates did not meet our targeted levels.
Premiums ceded for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 were $272.4 million compared to $232.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $39.7 million. Our U.S. insurance segment purchases significant proportional and excess of loss reinsurance on both a treaty and facultative basis that is designed to reduce the volatility in our severity driven classes of business. As a result, as the total of our gross premiums written increases so does the total of premiums ceded.
491,226
221,836
(243,389
(118,333
Net Losses and Loss Expenses. Net losses and loss expenses were $182.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to $66.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $115.6 million. This segment purchases significant reinsurance coverage, therefore, we have recorded reinsurance recoveries in our incurred but not reported loss reserves. The following table shows the components of net losses and loss expenses incurred:
39
22,678
11,416
125,203
2,877
362,238
130,298
(327,848
(77,848
The net loss and loss expense ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was 73.5% compared to 64.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The increase in the net loss and loss expense ratio was primarily due to the impact of Hurricanes Charley, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne from which we incurred net losses and loss expenses of $47.6 million or 19.2 percentage points. Our estimates for the losses incurred for these hurricanes were derived from formal loss advices, the output of industry models, a review of in-force contracts and preliminary indications from clients. Consequently, actual losses from these hurricanes may vary materially from estimated losses. During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, we experienced positive prior period development of $10.9 million or 4.4 percentage points on our 2003 accident year property account. We primarily use the Bornhuetter-Ferguson method to estimate the ultimate cost of losses; it takes as a starting point an assumed loss and loss expense ratio and blends in the loss and loss expense ratio implied by our experience to date. During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, actual claims were less than expected for our 2003 accident year property account resulting in favorable loss development.
Acquisition Costs. Acquisition costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 were $7.5 million compared to $0.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $6.9 million. The acquisition cost ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was 3.0% compared to 0.6 % for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The increase in acquisition costs was primarily due to a reduction in the level of commissions received on ceded premiums, which are offset against acquisition costs. During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, these commissions were $61.6 million, which had a positive impact on the acquisition cost ratio of 24.8 percentage points compared to $30.9 million and 29.9 percentage points for the nine months ended September 30, 2003.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 were $49.9 million compared to $11.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $38.2 million. The general and administrative expenses ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was 20.1% compared with 11.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. As we did not allocate any of our general and administrative expenses, except for the personnel expenses of our underwriters, prior to January 1, 2004, these amounts and ratios are not comparable.
40
Our U.S. reinsurance segment principally consists of treaty reinsurance business sourced in the U.S. and focuses almost exclusively on exposures in the U.S. The underlying property and casualty business classes covered by the treaties we write in our U.S. reinsurance segment include: professional lines, liability, property and marine and aviation.
Quarters Ended September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003
199
(611
34,332
49,303
2,029
26,053
39.8
45.5
Premiums. In the quarter ended September 30, 2004, gross premiums written were $82.2 million compared to $82.0 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $0.2 million. The table below shows gross premiums written by line of business:
45,363
52,533
22,519
28,630
13,052
(1,410
Marine and Aviation
1,267
2,249
41
Gross premiums written for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 were flat at $82.2 million. The decrease of $7.2 million in gross premiums written within our professional lines book of business was primarily due to one treaty written in 2003 with a coverage period of 17 months, consequently the renewal date of that contract will be in 2005. Our liability book of business experienced a decrease in gross premiums written of $6.1 million, which was primarily driven by our decision to not renew some contracts that did not meet our underwriting targets. Our property book of business experienced an increase in gross premiums written of $14.5 million, which was primarily due to the recruitment of a property underwriter in the second half of 2003.
Premiums ceded for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 were $1.5 million compared to $0.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $0.8 million.
66,516
31,512
(1,197
(525
Gross premiums are earned over the period of the insured risk. Consequently, the level of earned premiums generally has increased as premiums written throughout 2003 continued to be earned in 2004. In addition, a large portion of premiums written in 2003 were on a risk-attaching basis, for which the earning period is twice the underlying contract period. Consequently, a significant proportion of the gross premiums has been and will continue to be earned on these contracts in 2004.
Net Losses and Loss Expenses. Net losses and loss expenses were $70.3 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 compared to $21.0 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $49.3 million. The following table shows the components of net losses and loss expenses incurred:
2,347
4,338
663
64,557
20,778
(895
(397
The net loss and loss expense ratio for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 was 107.7% compared to 67.9% for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. The increase in the net loss and loss expense ratio was primarily due to the impact of Hurricanes Charley, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne from which we incurred net losses and loss expenses of $27.1 million or 41.4 percentage points. Our estimates
42
for the losses incurred for these hurricanes were derived from formal loss advices, the output of industry models, a review of in-force contracts and preliminary indications from clients. Consequently, actual losses from these hurricanes may vary materially from estimated losses. We also experienced positive prior period development of $1.0 million or 1.6 percentage points generated on our 2003 accident year property account. We primarily use the Bornhuetter-Ferguson method to estimate the ultimate cost of losses; it takes as a starting point an assumed loss and loss expense ratio and blends in the loss and loss expense ratio implied by our experience to date. During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, there was a lack of claims in our 2003 accident year property account that caused the reduction in expected losses.
Acquisition Costs. Acquisition costs for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 were $14.8 million compared to $5.8 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $9.0 million. The acquisition cost ratio for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 was 22.7% compared to 18.7% for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. The increase was due to an increase in the level of commissions.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 were $2.9 million compared to $0.8 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $2.1 million. The general and administrative expenses ratio for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 was 4.4% compared with 2.7% for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. As we did not allocate any of our general and administrative expenses, except for the personnel expenses of our underwriters, prior to January 1, 2004, these amounts and ratios are not comparable.
43
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003
115,779
114,650
114,974
107,974
22,516
6,025
(21,541
(1.9
1.1
13.4
Premiums. In the nine months ended September 30, 2004, gross premiums written were $311.8 million compared to $196.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $115.7 million. The table below shows gross premiums written by line of business:
188,412
127,256
75,139
43,808
42,549
19,535
5,731
5,453
Our professional lines book generated gross premiums written of $188.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2004, an increase of 48.1% over the nine months ended September 30, 2003. Our liability book generated gross premiums written of $75.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2004, an increase of 71.5% over the nine months ended September 30, 2003. These
44
increases were primarily generated by our ability to quote and write the contracts that came up for renewal on January 1, 2004. In 2003, we were unable to take part in the January 1, 2003 renewal season because we did not receive regulatory approvals until mid-December 2002. In addition, we increased the statutory capital of AXIS Reinsurance Company in excess of $500 million, which enabled us to participate on more business. We wrote $42.5 million of gross premiums relating to property reinsurance during the nine months ended September 30, 2004, an increase of 117.8% over the nine months ended September 30, 2003. This was driven by the recruitment of a property underwriter in the second half of 2003.
Premiums ceded for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 were $3.4 million compared to $2.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $1.2 million.
173,919
56,805
(3,068
(928
Net Losses and Loss Expenses. Net losses and loss expenses were $148.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to $40.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $107.9 million. The following table shows the components of net losses and loss expenses incurred:
4,243
11,094
135,633
40,738
(2,234
(639
The net loss and loss expense ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was 87.1% compared to 72.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The increase in the net loss and loss expense ratio was primarily due to the impact of to Hurricanes Charley, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne from
45
which we incurred net losses and loss expenses of $27.1 million or 15.8 percentage points. Our estimates for the losses incurred from these hurricanes were derived from formal loss advices, the output of industry models, a review of in-force contracts and preliminary indications from clients. Consequently, actual losses from these hurricanes may vary materially from estimated losses. We experienced positive prior period development of $1.7 million or 1.0 percentage points generated on our 2003 accident year property account. We primarily use the Bornhuetter-Ferguson method to estimate the ultimate cost of losses; it takes as a starting point an assumed loss and loss expense ratio and blends in the loss and loss expense ratio implied by our experience to date. During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, there was a lack of claims in our 2003 accident year property account that caused the reduction in expected losses.
Acquisition Costs. Acquisition costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 were $35.0 million compared to $12.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $22.5 million. The acquisition cost ratio for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 was 20.5% compared to 22.4% for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. The decrease was due to a reduction in the level of commissions.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 were $8.1 million compared to $2.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $6.1 million. The general and administrative expenses ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was 4.7% compared with 3.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. As we did not allocate any of our general and administrative expenses, except for the personnel expenses of our underwriters, prior to January 1, 2004, these amounts and ratios are not comparable.
Financial Condition and Liquidity
We are a holding company and have no substantial operations of our own. Our assets consist primarily of our investments in subsidiaries. At September 30, 2004, we had operating subsidiaries in Bermuda, Ireland and the United States, a branch and representative office in the United Kingdom and a branch in Switzerland. Accordingly, our future cash flows depend upon the availability of dividends or other statutorily permissible payments from our subsidiaries. The ability to pay dividends is limited by the applicable laws and regulations of Bermuda, the United States and Ireland, which subject our insurance subsidiaries to significant regulatory restrictions. These laws and regulations require, among other things, some of our insurance subsidiaries to maintain minimum solvency requirements and limit the amount of dividends that these subsidiaries can pay to us, which in turn may limit our ability to pay dividends and make other payments.
Additionally, we are subject to Bermuda regulatory constraints that affect our ability to pay dividends on our common shares and make other payments. Under the Bermuda Companies Act 1981, as amended, AXIS Capital may declare or pay a dividend or make a distribution out of contributed surplus only if it has no reasonable grounds for believing that it is, or would after the payment be, unable to pay its liabilities as they become due or that the realizable value of its assets would thereby be less than the aggregate of our liabilities and issued share capital and share premium accounts. In addition, pursuant to the terms of our credit agreement, we cannot pay cash dividends to our shareholders in excess of $150 million in the aggregate during any fiscal year.
At September 30, 2004, the maximum amount of distributions that our subsidiaries could pay to AXIS Capital under applicable laws and regulations without prior regulatory approval was approximately $941.5 million.
46
Financial Condition
At September 30, 2004, total investments at fair market value, accrued interest receivable and cash net of unsettled investment trades were $5.2 billion, compared to $4.0 billion at December 31, 2003. Our investment portfolio consisted primarily of fixed income securities at September 30, 2004 and was managed by several external investment management firms. At September 30, 2004, all of these fixed income securities were investment grade, with 82.7 % rated Aa3 or AA- or better by an internationally recognized rating agency. The weighted-average rating of our fixed income portfolio was AA+ based on ratings assigned by Standard & Poors. The net payable for investments purchased at September 30, 2004 was $197.3 million compared to a net receivable of $3.4 million at December 31, 2003. Net receivables/payables are a result of timing differences only, as investments are accounted for on a trade date basis.
At September 30, 2004, we had $924.6 million of insurance and reinsurance premium balances receivable compared to $660.5 million at December 31, 2003. This increase was due to the level of gross premium written during the nine months ended September 30, 2004. At September 30, 2004, we had prepaid reinsurance of $234.2 million, an increase of $69.2 million since December 31, 2003, following an increase in the level of reinsurance purchased by our global insurance and U.S insurance segments. At September 30, 2004, we had reinsurance recoverables of $551.2 million, an increase of $426.3 million since December 31, 2003, following loss recoveries of $247.3 million from Hurricanes Charley, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne. Loss recoveries relating to the hurricanes were from reinsurers, of which 98.4% were rated the equivalent of A- or better by internationally recognized rating agencies.
At September 30, 2004, we had $2.2 billion of reserves for loss and loss expenses compared to $992.8 million at December 31, 2003, an increase of $1,230.4 million. Of this balance, $1.8 billion, or 81.2%, was incurred but not reported reserves.
At September 30, 2004, our shareholders equity was $3.1 billion compared to $2.8 billion at December 31, 2003, an increase of 10.7%. This increase was primarily due to net income of $313.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, offset by a $2.2 million decrease in the unrealized appreciation on our investment portfolio during the same period.
Liquidity
In the nine months ended September 30, 2004, we generated a net operating cash inflow of $1,262.8 million, primarily relating to premiums received and investment income. During the same period, we paid losses of $142.0 million. We invested a net cash amount of $875.3 million during the period, and at September 30, 2004 had a cash balance of $935.3 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, our cash flows from operations provided us with sufficient liquidity to meet our operating requirements.
In the nine months ended September 30, 2003, we generated a net operating cash inflow of $985.0 million, primarily relating to premiums received and investment income. During the same period we paid losses of $63.0 million. We invested a net cash amount of $1,255.4 million, and at September 30, 2003 had a cash balance of $790.6 million.
On an ongoing basis, our sources of funds primarily consist of premiums written, reinsurance recoveries, investment income and proceeds from sales and redemptions of investments. Cash is used primarily to pay losses and loss expenses, reinsurance, acquisition costs and general and administrative expenses and to purchase new investments and fund dividend payments.
47
Our cash flows from operations generally represent the difference between: (1) premiums collected, reinsurance recoveries and investment earnings realized; and (2) losses and loss expenses paid, reinsurance purchased, underwriting and other expenses paid, investment losses realized and dividends paid. Cash flows from operations may differ substantially, however, from net income. The potential for a large claim under one of our insurance or reinsurance contracts means that substantial and unpredictable payments may need to be made within relatively short periods of time.
On September 13, 2004, we declared a quarterly dividend of $0.125 per common share to shareholders of record at September 30, 2004. The dividend was paid on October 14, 2004.
On April 21, 2004, we completed a secondary offering of up to 20,000,000 common shares held by some of our founding shareholders at a price of $27.91 per share. On April 27, 2004, we completed a secondary offering of 3,000,000 common shares to cover over-allotments. We did not sell any common shares in connection with the registration and did not receive any proceeds from the offering.
Capital Resources
On March 25, 2004, we renewed our credit facility by entering into a three-year $750 million credit facility with a syndicate of commercial banks led by JPMorgan Chase Bank, as administrative agent and lender. Under the terms of the new credit facility, up to $750 million may be used by the Company, AXIS Specialty Limited, AXIS Re Limited, AXIS Specialty Europe Limited, AXIS Reinsurance Company, AXIS Specialty Insurance Company and AXIS Surplus Insurance Company to issue letters of credit and up to $300 million may be used by these entities for general corporate purposes, with total borrowings not to exceed $750 million. The credit facility contains various loan covenants with which we must comply, including limitations on the incurrence of future indebtedness, future liens, fundamental changes, investments and certain transactions with affiliates. The credit facility also requires that we maintain (1) a minimum amount of consolidated shareholders equity equal to or greater than the sum of $1.975 billion plus (A) 50% of consolidated net income for each fiscal quarter beginning with the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2005 and (B) 100% of the net cash proceeds received after March 25, 2004 from any issuance of our capital stock and (2) a debt to total capitalization ratio not greater than 0.35:1.00. The credit facility contains restrictions on our ability to make acquisitions, except that we may, among other things, acquire assets and entities in the insurance and reinsurance business for consideration in an aggregate amount not in excess of $250 million. Our ability to pay dividends or make other restricted payments is also limited, except that we may, among other things, pay cash dividends to our shareholders in an amount not exceeding $150 million for any fiscal year and we may repurchase shares of our capital stock for consideration in an aggregate amount not exceeding $500 million. There was no outstanding indebtedness under the credit facility at September 30, 2004 or December 31, 2003. At September 30, 2004, we had letters of credit of $133.9 million outstanding under the credit facility. At December 31, 2003, we had letters of credit of $127.3 million outstanding under our then existing credit facility. As at September 30, 2004, we were in compliance with all covenants.
Commitments
We did not make any significant capital expenditures during the quarter ended September 30, 2004. We currently expect capital expenditures for 2004 to be less than $50 million.
48
The following table provides an analysis of our contractual obligations at September 30, 2004:
Payment due by period(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)
Less than1 year
1-3 years
3-5 years
More than5 years
Operating Lease Obligations
61,448
7,521
14,709
11,832
27,386
We invested in senior preferred shares of a collateralized loan obligation with a carrying value of $15.7 million. In connection with this investment, we have commitments that may require additional funding of up to $9.3 million through February 2006.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
We are exposed to potential loss on our investment portfolio from various market risks, including changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, and from credit risk. Our investment portfolio primarily consists of fixed income securities denominated in both U.S. and foreign currencies. External investment professionals manage our portfolio under the direction of our management in accordance with detailed investment guidelines provided by us. Our guidelines do not currently permit the use of derivatives other than foreign currency forward contracts. In the future, we may change our guidelines to permit the use of derivatives. We do not enter into risk sensitive instruments for trading purposes.
Interest Rate Risk. Fluctuations in interest rates have a direct impact on the market valuation of fixed income securities included in our investment portfolio. As interest rates rise, the market value of our fixed income portfolio falls, and the converse is also true. We manage interest rate risk by selecting investments with characteristics such as duration, yield, currency and liquidity tailored to the anticipated cash outflow characteristics of our insurance and reinsurance liabilities.
Our current duration target for our investments is two to four years. The duration of an investment is based on the maturity of the security and also reflects the payment of interest and the possibility of early principal payment of such security. We seek to utilize investment benchmarks that reflect this duration target. Management periodically revises our investment benchmarks based on business and economic conditions, including the average duration of our potential liabilities. At September 30, 2004, our invested assets (assets under management by external investment managers) had an approximate duration of 3.1 years.
At September 30, 2004, we held $1,470.7 million at fair market value, or 32.5% of our total invested assets, in mortgage-backed securities compared to $1,012.9 million, or 28.2%, at December 31, 2003. When interest rates decline, these assets are exposed to prepayment risk, which occurs when holders of underlying mortgages increase the frequency with which they prepay the outstanding principal before the maturity date and refinance at a lower interest rate cost. When interest rates increase, these assets are exposed to extension risk, which occurs when holders of underlying mortgages reduce the frequency on which they prepay the outstanding principal before the maturity date and delay any refinancing of the outstanding principal.
We have calculated the effect that an immediate parallel shift in the U.S. interest rate yield curve would have on our assets under management by third party investment managers at September 30, 2004. The modeling of this effect was performed on each security individually using the securitys effective
49
duration and changes in prepayment expectations for mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. The results of this analysis are summarized in the table below.
Interest Rate Movement Analysis on Market Value of Assets under Management by External Investment Managers
Interest Rate Shift in Basis Points (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)
-100
-50
0
+50
+100
+200
Total Market Value
4,691,921
4,627,924
4,559,191
4,486,697
4,411,938
4,261,021
Market Value Change from Base
2.91
1.51
-1.59
-3.23
-6.54
Change in Unrealized Value
132,730
68,733
(72,494
(147,253
(298,170
Foreign Currency Risk. Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates have a direct impact on the market valuation of fixed income securities included in our investment portfolio that are denominated in those currencies. Therefore, we attempt to manage our foreign currency risk by seeking to match our liabilities under insurance and reinsurance policies that are payable in foreign currencies with investments that are denominated in such currencies. Furthermore, we may use foreign currency forward contracts in an effort to hedge against movements in the value of foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar and to gain exposure to interest rate differentials between differing market rates. A foreign currency forward contract involves an obligation to purchase or sell a specified currency at a future date at a price set at the time of the contract. Foreign currency forward contracts will not eliminate fluctuations in the value of our assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies but rather allow us to establish a rate of exchange for a future point in time. We do not expect to enter into such contracts with respect to a material amount of our assets. Foreign currency forward contracts purchased are not specifically identifiable against cash, any single security or any groups of securities and, therefore, do not qualify and are not designated as a hedge for financial reporting purposes. All realized gains and losses and unrealized gains and losses on foreign currency forward contracts are recognized in our statements of operations and comprehensive income. At September 30, 2004, the net contractual amount of foreign currency forward contracts was $23.6 million with an unrealized loss of $0.6 million. At December 31, 2003, the net contractual amount of foreign currency forward contracts was $3.8 million with a negligible fair market value.
At September 30, 2004, we had insurance and reinsurance premium balances receivable of $924.6 million compared to $660.5 million at December 31, 2003. Of this balance, 81.3% was denominated in U.S. dollars. Of the remaining balance, 10.9% was denominated in Euro and 4.4% in Sterling. A 5% increase or decrease in the value of the Euro and Sterling currencies against the U.S. dollar would produce a gain or loss of approximately $7.1 million, compared to $1.0 million at December 31, 2003.
Credit Risk. We have exposure to credit risk primarily as a holder of fixed income securities. Our risk management strategy and investment policy is to invest in debt instruments of high credit quality issuers and to limit the amount of credit exposure with respect to particular ratings categories and any one issuer. We attempt to limit our credit exposure by purchasing fixed income investments rated BBB-/Baa3 or higher. In addition, we have limited our exposure to any single corporate issuer to 5% or less of our portfolio for securities rated A-/A3 or above and 2% or less of our portfolio for securities rated between BBB-/Baa3 and BBB+/Baa1. At September 30, 2004, we did not have an aggregate exposure to any single issuer of more than 2% of our portfolio, other than with respect to U.S. government and agency securities. In addition, we have credit risk under some contracts where we receive premiums in return for assuming the risk of default on pre-determined portfolios of sovereign and corporate obligations.
Value-at-Risk. Our management uses Value-at-Risk (VaR) as one of its tools to measure potential losses in fair market values of our investment portfolio. The VaR calculation is calculated by a third party provider and reviewed by management. VaR uses a Monte Carlo simulation to project many
50
different prices of fixed income securities, derivatives and currencies taking into account, among other things, the volatility and the correlation between security price changes over various forecast horizons. The VaR of our investment portfolio at September 30, 2004 was approximately $190.6 million compared to $174.1 million at December 31, 2003, which represents the potential loss in fair market value of our investment portfolio over a one year time horizon within a 95% confidence level. This increase was primarily due to a higher overall investment balance. The VaR computation is a risk analysis tool and does not purport to represent actual losses in fair market value. We cannot predict actual future movements in market rates and do not present these results to be indicative of future movements in such market rates or to be representative of any actual impact that future changes in market rates may have on our future results of operations or financial position.
Effects of Inflation
We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our results of operations, except insofar as inflation may affect interest rates. The potential exists, after a catastrophe loss, for the development of inflationary pressures in a local economy. The anticipated effects on us are considered in our catastrophe loss models. The effects of inflation are also considered in pricing and in estimating reserves for unpaid claims and claim expenses. The actual effects of inflation on our results of operations cannot be accurately known until claims are ultimately settled.
51
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statement
This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. federal securities laws. We intend these forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements in the federal securities laws. In some cases, these statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as may, should, could, anticipate, estimate, expect, plan, believe, predict, potential and intend. Forward-looking statements contained in this report include information regarding the benefits from continued underwriting discipline and from insureds seeking to move their business to financially stronger insurers and reinsurers, pricing conditions, the mix of businesses within and between our business segments, amounts of net losses and loss expenses, managing interest rate and foreign currency risks, valuations of potential interest rate shifts, foreign currency rate changes and measurements of potential losses in fair market values of our investment portfolio. Forward-looking statements only reflect our expectations and are not guarantees of performance. These statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Actual events or results may differ materially from our expectations. Important factors that could cause actual events or results to be materially different from our expectations include (1) our limited operating history, (2) the occurrence of natural and man-made disasters, (3) actual claims exceeding our loss reserves, (4) failure of any of the loss limitation methods we employ, (5) effects of emerging claims and coverage issues, (6) the failure of our cedents to adequately evaluate risks, (7) the loss of one or more key executives (8) a decline in our ratings with internationally recognized rating agencies, (9) loss of business provided to us by our major brokers, (10) changes in governmental regulations, (11) increased competition and (12) general economic conditions. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
52
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Our management has carried out an evaluation, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Our management is not aware of any change in its internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
53
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Except as set forth below, we are currently not a party to any material legal proceedings. From time to time, we are subject to routine legal proceedings, including arbitrations, arising in the ordinary course of business. Those legal proceedings generally relate to claims asserted by or against us in the ordinary course of our insurance and reinsurance operations.
On August 26, 2004, AXIS U.S. Holdings received a subpoena from the Attorney General of the State of New York seeking information regarding incentive commission agreements between its insurance companies and insurance brokers. On September 20, 2004, AXIS U.S. Holdings received two additional subpoenas from the Attorney General of the State of New York seeking information regarding fictitious and inflated quotes submitted by insurance companies to insurance brokers. On October 21, 2004, AXIS US Holdings received a further subpoena from the Attorney General of the State of New York seeking information regarding tying, or conditioning direct insurance on the placement of reinsurance. These inquiries are part of an industry-wide investigation and we are cooperating fully in the investigation.
Consistent with long-standing and wide-spread industry practice, we have entered into incentive commission agreements with brokers. As a result of this investigation, we have ceased entering into, and have suspended making payments under, incentive commission agreements.
We do not believe that we have engaged in the improper business practices that are the focus of the Attorney General of the State of New Yorks investigation. To confirm that our employees have not engaged in any of these improper business practices, we are conducting an internal investigation led by outside counsel to examine the subjects raised by the Attorney General of the State of New York. We believe that this is in the best interests of the Company, our shareholders and our employees.
We understand that some purported shareholder class action lawsuits have been filed against us and certain of our executive officers relating to certain of the practices being investigated by the Attorney General of the State of New York. We believe that these lawsuits are without merit and intend to vigorously defend against them.
We cannot predict the effect that the investigation or the lawsuits will have on the industry or our business, although negative publicity, fines and penalties or rating agency actions could have a material adverse effect on our business, results or operations and financial condition. In addition, to the extent that the fines or penalties are assessed against brokers, our results of operations could be adversely affected because we bear the credit risk of brokers.
Item 6. Exhibits
(a)
3.1
Certificate of Incorporation and Memorandum of Association (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Amendment No.1) (Registration No. 333-103620) filed on April 16, 2003).
Bye-Laws (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form 10-Q filed on August 6, 2004).
31.1
Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
54
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: November 5 , 2004
By:
/s/ John Charman
John Charman
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Authorized Officer)
/s/ Andrew Cook
Andrew Cook
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
55