Companies:
10,793
total market cap:
$135.218 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ USD
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
Axos Financial
AX
#3070
Rank
$5.05 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
$89.21
Share price
2.80%
Change (1 day)
56.18%
Change (1 year)
๐ฆ Banks
๐ณ Financial services
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Stock Splits
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Annual Reports (10-K)
Axos Financial
Quarterly Reports (10-Q)
Financial Year FY2015 Q1
Axos Financial - 10-Q quarterly report FY2015 Q1
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period ended
September 30, 2014
¨
TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number: 000-51201
BofI HOLDING, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
33-0867444
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
4350 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 140, San Diego, CA
92122
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (858) 350-6200
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
x
Yes
¨
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website every Interactive Data file required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
x
Yes
¨
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filed, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Large accelerated filer
x
Accelerated filer
o
Non-accelerated filer
¨
Smaller reporting company
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).
¨
Yes
x
No
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s common stock on the last practicable date:
14,813,579
shares of common stock,
$0.01
par value per share, as of
October 29, 2014
.
Table of Contents
B
OF
I HOLDING, INC.
INDEX
Page
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
1
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited) as of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014
1
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited) for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013
2
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (unaudited) for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013
3
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (unaudited) for the three months ended September 30, 2014
4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013
5
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
6
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
37
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
38
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
40
FINANCIAL CONDITION
46
LIQUIDITY
51
OFF-BALANCE SHEET COMMITMENTS AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
52
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND REQUIREMENTS
52
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
53
ITEM 3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS
55
ITEM 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
55
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
57
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
57
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
57
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
57
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
57
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
57
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
57
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
58
SIGNATURES
59
Table of Contents
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
B
OF
I HOLDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
September 30,
2014
June 30,
2014
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks
$
198,160
$
155,484
Federal funds sold
100
100
Total cash and cash equivalents
198,260
155,584
Securities:
Trading
8,187
8,066
Available-for-sale
205,780
214,778
Held-to-maturity fair value $242,167 as of September 2014 and $243,966 as of June 2014
243,402
247,729
Stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank, at cost
50,525
42,770
Loans held for sale, carried at fair value
18,021
20,575
Loans held for sale, lower of cost or fair value
72,719
114,796
Loans—net of allowance for loan losses of $20,495 as of September 2014 and $18,373 as of June 2014
3,959,155
3,532,841
Accrued interest receivable
15,368
13,863
Furniture, equipment and software—net
7,362
6,707
Deferred income tax
24,240
25,245
Cash surrender value of life insurance
5,670
5,625
Mortgage servicing rights, carried at fair value
749
562
Other real estate owned and repossessed vehicles
212
75
Other assets
15,213
13,783
TOTAL ASSETS
$
4,824,863
$
4,402,999
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing
$
206,248
$
186,786
Interest bearing
3,055,508
2,854,750
Total deposits
3,261,756
3,041,536
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
35,000
45,000
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
1,075,000
910,000
Subordinated debentures
5,155
5,155
Accrued interest payable
1,195
1,350
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities and other liabilities
34,656
29,180
Total liabilities
4,412,762
4,032,221
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 8)
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Preferred stock— $0.01 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized;
Series A—$10,000 stated value and liquidation preference per share; 515 shares issued and outstanding as of September 2014 and June 2014
5,063
5,063
Common stock—$0.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 15,750,279 shares issued and 14,763,507 shares outstanding as of September 2014; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 15,423,822 shares issued and 14,451,900 shares outstanding as of June 2014
158
154
Additional paid-in capital
230,011
207,579
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)—net of tax
(8,082
)
(10,366
)
Retained earnings
201,224
183,460
Treasury stock, at cost; 986,772 shares as of September 2014 and 971,922 shares as of June 2014
(16,273
)
(15,112
)
Total stockholders’ equity
412,101
370,778
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
$
4,824,863
$
4,402,999
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
Table of Contents
B
OF
I HOLDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
September 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
2014
2013
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME:
Loans, including fees
$
48,983
$
30,385
Investments
5,822
5,961
Total interest and dividend income
54,805
36,346
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits
7,244
5,605
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
2,180
1,363
Other borrowings
506
1,268
Total interest expense
9,930
8,236
Net interest income
44,875
28,110
Provision for loan losses
2,500
500
Net interest income, after provision for loan losses
42,375
27,610
NON-INTEREST INCOME:
Realized gain on sale of mortgage-backed securities
—
208
Other-than-temporary loss on securities:
Total impairment (losses) gains
(1,211
)
253
Loss recognized in other comprehensive income
—
(825
)
Net impairment loss recognized in earnings
(1,211
)
(572
)
Fair value gain on trading securities
121
623
Total unrealized (loss) gain on securities
(1,090
)
51
Prepayment penalty fee income
877
654
Gain on sale – other
916
3,089
Mortgage banking income
3,063
1,986
Banking service fees and other income
1,483
988
Total non-interest income
5,249
6,976
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
Salaries and related costs
9,697
7,782
Professional services
802
1,680
Occupancy and equipment
721
549
Data processing and internet
1,514
1,185
Advertising and promotional
1,306
589
Depreciation and amortization
717
721
Real estate owned and repossessed vehicles
57
69
FDIC and regulator fees
778
547
Other general and administrative
1,854
1,392
Total non-interest expense
17,446
14,514
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
30,178
20,072
INCOME TAXES
12,337
7,890
NET INCOME
$
17,841
$
12,182
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCK
$
17,764
$
12,104
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
$
20,125
$
12,792
Basic earnings per share
$
1.20
$
0.85
Diluted earnings per share
$
1.20
$
0.85
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
B
OF
I HOLDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)
2014
2013
NET INCOME
$
17,841
$
12,182
Net unrealized gain (loss) from available-for-sale securities
1,690
(62
)
Other-than-temporary impairment on held-to-maturity securities recognized in other comprehensive income
2,280
1,078
Reclassification of net gain (loss) from available-for-sale securities included in income
—
—
Unrealized gain (loss), net of reclassification adjustments, before income tax
3,970
1,016
Income tax (expense) benefit related to items of other comprehensive income
(1,686
)
(406
)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
2,284
610
Comprehensive income
$
20,125
$
12,792
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
B
OF
I HOLDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Unaudited)
Preferred Stock
Common Stock
Additional Paid-in Capital
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, Net of Income Tax
Treasury
Stock
Total
Number of Shares
(Dollars in thousands)
Shares
Amount
Issued
Treasury
Outstanding
Amount
BALANCE—July 1, 2014
515
$
5,063
15,423,822
(971,922
)
14,451,900
$
154
$
207,579
$
183,460
$
(10,366
)
$
(15,112
)
$
370,778
Net income
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
17,841
—
—
17,841
Other comprehensive income
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2,284
—
2,284
Cash dividends on preferred stock
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(77
)
—
—
(77
)
Issuance of common stock
—
—
281,217
—
281,217
3
20,560
—
—
—
20,563
Stock-based compensation expense
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,320
—
—
—
1,320
Restricted stock grants and tax benefits
—
—
45,240
(14,850
)
30,390
1
552
—
—
(1,161
)
(608
)
Stock option exercises and tax benefits
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
BALANCE—September 30, 2014
515
$
5,063
15,750,279
(986,772
)
14,763,507
$
158
$
230,011
$
201,224
$
(8,082
)
$
(16,273
)
$
412,101
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
B
OF
I HOLDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)
2014
2013
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income
$
17,841
$
12,182
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Accretion of discounts on securities
(1,534
)
(2,076
)
Net accretion of discounts on loans
(730
)
(552
)
Stock-based compensation expense
1,320
966
Tax benefit from exercise of common stock options and vesting of restricted stock grants
(552
)
(1,917
)
Valuation of financial instruments carried at fair value
(121
)
(623
)
Impairment charge on securities
1,213
572
Provision for loan losses
2,500
500
Deferred income taxes
(681
)
1,639
Origination of loans held for sale
(191,630
)
(186,696
)
Unrealized (gain) loss on loans held for sale
45
123
Gain on sales of loans held for sale
(3,935
)
(5,198
)
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale
232,951
226,306
Change in fair value of mortgage servicing rights
(5
)
—
(Gain) loss on sale of other real estate and foreclosed assets
12
12
Depreciation and amortization of furniture, equipment and software
717
721
Net changes in assets and liabilities which provide (use) cash:
Accrued interest receivable
(1,505
)
591
Other assets
(1,702
)
380
Accrued interest payable
(155
)
(19
)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
4,867
13,077
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
58,916
59,988
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of investment securities
—
(43,245
)
Proceeds from repayment of securities
17,616
19,312
Purchase of stock of Federal Home Loan Bank
(11,850
)
(6,652
)
Proceeds from redemption of stock of Federal Home Loan Bank
4,095
3,570
Origination of loans for portfolio
(813,058
)
(470,669
)
Origination of mortgage warehouse loans, net
—
—
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned and repossessed assets
30
146
Principal repayments on loans
392,040
265,224
Net purchases of furniture, equipment and software
(1,372
)
(897
)
Net cash used in investing activities
(412,499
)
(233,211
)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net increase in deposits
220,220
100,965
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances
695,000
143,000
Repayment of Federal Home Loan Bank advances
(530,000
)
(77,417
)
Repayment of other borrowings and securities sold under agreements to repurchase
(10,000
)
—
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options
—
235
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
20,560
(110
)
Tax benefit from exercise of common stock options and vesting of restricted stock grants
556
1,917
Cash dividends on preferred stock
(77
)
(78
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
396,259
168,512
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
42,676
(4,711
)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—Beginning of year
155,584
201,694
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—End of period
$
198,260
$
196,983
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest paid on deposits and borrowed funds
$
10,086
$
8,254
Income taxes paid
$
14,802
$
813
Transfers to other real estate owned and repossessed vehicles from loans
$
—
$
811
Transfers from loans held for investment to loans held for sale
$
—
$
31,367
Transfers from loans held for sale to loans held for investment
$
7,127
$
398
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
B
OF
I HOLDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE THREE
MONTH PERIODS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30,
2014
AND
2013
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
1.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of BofI Holding, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, BofI Federal Bank (formerly Bank of Internet USA, the “Bank” and collectively with BofI Holding, Inc., the “Company”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements, presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), are unaudited and reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair statement of financial condition and results of operations for the interim periods. All adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. Results for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the year as a whole. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the audited annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)
with respect to interim financial reporting. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes for the year ended
June 30, 2014
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
2.
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Securities
.
Debt securities are classified as held-to-maturity and carried at amortized cost when management has both the positive intent and ability to hold them to maturity. Debt securities are classified as available-for-sale when they might be sold before maturity. Trading securities refer to certain types of assets that banks hold for resale at a profit at fair value. Increases or decreases in the fair value of trading securities are recognized in earnings as they occur. Securities available-for-sale are carried at fair value, with unrealized holding gains and losses reported in other comprehensive income, net of tax.
Gains and losses on securities sales are based on a comparison of sales proceeds and the amortized cost of the security sold using the specific identification method. Purchases and sales are recognized on the trade date. Interest income includes amortization of purchase premium or discount. Premiums and discounts on securities are amortized or accreted using the level-yield method without anticipating prepayments, except for mortgage-backed securities where prepayments are anticipated. The Company’s portfolios of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities are reviewed quarterly for other-than-temporary impairment. In performing this review, management considers (1) the length of time and extent that fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, (3) the impact of changes in market interest rates on the market value of the security and (4) whether the Company intends to sell or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell a security in an unrealized loss position before the Company recovers the security’s amortized cost. If either of these criteria for (4) is met, the entire difference between amortized cost and fair value is recognized in earnings. Alternatively, if the criteria for (4) is not met, the amount of impairment recognized in earnings is limited to the amount related to credit losses, while impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. The credit loss is defined as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis.
Loans
. Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are reported at the principal balance outstanding, net of unearned interest, deferred purchase premiums and discounts, deferred loan origination fees and costs, and an allowance for loan losses. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Premiums and discounts on loans purchased as well as loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, are deferred and recognized in interest income using the level-yield method.
Recognition of interest income on all portfolio segments is generally discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days delinquent unless the loan is well secured and in process of collection. Past due status is based on the contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.
All interest accrued but not received for loans placed on nonaccrual, is reversed against interest income. Interest received on such loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.
6
Table of Contents
Loans Held for Sale.
U.S government agency (“agency”) loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at fair value. Net unrealized gains and losses are recognized through the income statement. The Bank generally sells its loans with the servicing released to the buyer. Gains and losses on loan sales are recorded as mortgage banking income, based on the difference between sales proceeds and carrying value. Non-agency loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value.
Loans that were originated with the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future (loans held in portfolio) but which have been subsequently designated as being held for sale for risk management or liquidity needs are carried at the lower of cost or fair value calculated on an individual loan by loan basis.
There may be times when loans have been classified as held for sale and for some reason cannot be sold. Loans transferred to a long-term-investment classification from held-for-sale are transferred at the lower of cost or market value on the transfer date. Any difference between the carrying amount of the loan and its outstanding principal balance is recognized as an adjustment to yield by the interest method. A loan cannot be classified as a long-term investment unless the Bank has both the ability and the intent to hold the loan for the foreseeable future or until maturity.
Allowance for Loan Losses.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level estimated to provide for probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. Management determines the adequacy of the allowance based on reviews of individual loans and pools of loans, recent loss experience, current economic conditions, the risk characteristics of the various categories of loans and other pertinent factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective and requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available. The allowance is increased by the provision for loan losses, which is charged against current period operating results and recoveries of loans previously charged-off. The allowance is decreased by the amount of charge-offs of loans deemed uncollectible. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged off. See Note 5 of these financial statement footnotes and the financial statement footnotes for the year ended
June 30, 2014
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.
3.
FAIR VALUE
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820,
Fair Value Measurement
, also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1:
Quoted prices in active markets for
identical
assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date. Level 1 assets and liabilities include debt and equity securities that are actively traded in an exchange or over-the-counter market and are highly liquid, such as, among other assets and securities, certain U.S. treasury and other U.S. Government debt.
Level 2:
Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for
similar
assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets include securities with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments and whose value is determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3:
Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models such as discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.
When available, the Company generally uses quoted market prices to determine fair value, in which case the items are classified in Level 1. In some cases where a market price is available, the Company will make use of acceptable practical expedients (such as matrix pricing) to calculate fair value, in which case the items are classified in Level 2.
The Company considers relevant and observable market prices in its valuations where possible. The frequency of transactions, the size of the bid-ask spread and the nature of the participants are some of the factors the Company uses to help determine whether a market is active and orderly or inactive and not orderly. Price quotes based upon transactions that are not orderly are not considered to be determinative of fair value and should be given little, if any, weight in measuring fair value.
7
Table of Contents
If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed valuation techniques that use, where possible, current market-based or independently sourced market parameters, such as interest rates, credit spreads, housing value forecasts, etc. Items valued using such internally generated valuation techniques are classified according to the lowest level input or value driver that is significant to the valuation. Thus, an item may be classified in Level 3 even though there may be some significant inputs that are readily observable.
The following section describes the valuation methodologies used by the Company to measure various financial instruments at fair value, including an indication of the level in the fair value hierarchy in which each instrument is generally classified:
Securities—trading.
Trading securities are recorded at fair value. The trading portfolio consists of
two
different issues of floating-rate debt securities collateralized by pools of bank trust preferred securities. Recent liquidity and economic uncertainty have made the market for collateralized debt obligations less active or inactive. As quoted market prices are not available, the Level 3 fair values for these securities are determined by the Company utilizing industry-standard tools to calculate the net present value of the expected cash flows available to the securities from the underlying assets. The Company’s expected cash flows are calculated for each security and include the impact of actual and forecasted bank defaults within each collateral pool as well as structural features of the security’s tranche such as lock outs, subordination and overcollateralization. The forecast of underlying bank defaults in each pool is based upon a quarterly financial update including the trend in non-performing assets, the allowance for loan losses and the underlying bank’s capital ratios. Also a factor is the Company’s loan loss experience in the local economy in which the bank operates. At
September 30, 2014
, the Company’s forecast of cash flows for both securities includes actual and forecasted defaults totaling
25.5%
of all banks in the collateral pools, compared to
16.4%
of the banks actually in default. The expected cash flows reflect the Company’s best estimate of all pool losses which are then applied to the overcollateralization reserve and the subordinated tranches to determine the cash flows. The Company selects a discount rate margin based upon the spread between U.S. Treasury rates and the market rates for active credit grades for financial companies. The discount margin when added to the U.S. Treasury rate determines the discount rate, reflecting primarily market liquidity and interest rate risk since expected credit loss is included in the cash flows. At
September 30, 2014
, the Company used a weighted average discount margin of
425
basis points above
U.S. Treasury
rates to calculate the net present value of the expected cash flows and the fair value of its trading securities.
The Level 3 fair values determined by the Company for its trading securities rely heavily on management’s assumptions as to the future credit performance of the collateral banks, the impact of the global and regional economic activity, the timing of forecasted defaults and the discount rate applied to cash flows. The fair value of the trading securities at
September 30, 2014
is sensitive to an increase or decrease in the discount rate. An increase in the discount margin of
100
basis points would have reduced the total fair value of the trading securities and decreased net income before income tax by
$909
. A decrease in the discount margin of
100
basis points would have increased the total fair value of the trading securities and increased net income before income tax by
$1,067
.
Securities—available-for-sale and held-to-maturity
.
Available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair value and consist of residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) issued by U.S. agencies, non-agencies, collateralized loan obligations, and municipals. Held-to-maturity securities are recorded at amortized cost and consist of RMBS issued by U.S. agencies, RMBS issued by non-agencies, and municipals. Fair value for U.S. agency securities is generally based on quoted market prices of similar securities used to form a dealer quote or a pricing matrix. There continues to be significant illiquidity in the market for RMBS issued by non-agencies, impacting the availability and reliability of transparent pricing. As orderly quoted market prices are not available, the Level 3 fair values for these securities are determined by the Company utilizing industry-standard tools to calculate the net present value of the expected cash flows available to the securities from the underlying mortgage assets. The Company computes Level 3 fair values for each non-agency RMBS in the same manner (as described below) whether available-for-sale or held-to-maturity.
To determine the performance of the underlying mortgage loan pools, the Company estimates prepayments, defaults, and loss severities based on a number of macroeconomic factors, including housing price changes, unemployment rates, interest rates and borrower attributes such as credit score and loan documentation at the time of origination. The Company inputs for each security a projection of monthly default rates, loss severity rates and voluntary prepayment rates for the underlying mortgages for the remaining life of the security to determine the expected cash flows. The projections of default rates are derived by the Company from the historic default rate observed in the pool of loans collateralizing the security, increased by and decreased by the forecasted increase or decrease in the national unemployment rate. The projections of loss severity rates are derived by the Company from the historic loss severity rate observed in the pool of loans, increased by (and decreased by) the forecasted decrease or increase in the national home price appreciation (“HPA”) index. The largest factors influencing the Company’s modeling of the monthly default rate are unemployment and housing price appreciation. The most updated national unemployment rate announced prior to the end of the period covered by this report (reported in August 2014) was
6.1%
, down from the high of
10%
in October 2009. Consensus estimates for unemployment are that the rate will continue to decline. Going forward, the Company is projecting lower monthly default rates. The range of loss severity rates applied to each default used in the Company’s projections at
September 30,
8
Table of Contents
2014
are from
31.5%
up to
97.5%
based upon individual bond historical performance. The default rates and the severities are projected for every non-agency RMBS security held by the Company and will vary monthly based upon the actual performance of the security and the macroeconomic factors discussed above.
To determine the discount rates used to compute the present value of the expected cash flows for these non-agency RMBS securities, the Company separates the securities by the borrower characteristics in the underlying pool. Specifically, “prime” securities generally have borrowers with higher FICO scores and better documentation of income. “Alt-A” securities generally have borrowers with a little lower FICO and a little less documentation of income. “Pay-option ARMs” are Alt-A securities with borrowers that tend to pay the least amount of principal (or increase their loan balance through negative amortization). The Company calculates separate discount rates for prime, Alt-A and Pay-option ARM non-agency RMBS securities using market-participant assumptions for risk, capital and return on equity. The range of annual default rates used in the Company’s projections at
September 30, 2014
are from
0%
up to
22.8%
with prime securities tending toward the lower end of the range and Alt-A and Pay-option ARMs tending toward the higher end of the range. The Company applies its discount rates to the projected monthly cash flows which already reflect the full impact of all forecasted losses using the assumptions described above. When calculating present value of the expected cash flows at
September 30, 2014
, the Company computed its discount rates as a spread between
240
and
704
basis points over the interpolated swap curve with prime securities tending toward the lower end of the range and Alt-A and Pay-option ARMs tending toward the higher end of the range.
Loans Held for Sale.
Loans held for sale at fair value are primarily single-family and multifamily residential loans. The fair value of loans held for sale is determined by pricing for comparable assets or by existing forward sales commitment prices with investors.
Impaired Loans.
Impaired loans are loans which are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the borrowers or the collateral pledged. The accrual of interest income has been discontinued for impaired loans. The impaired loans are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. The Company assesses loans individually and identifies impairment when the loan is classified as impaired or has been restructured or management has serious doubts about the future collectibility of principal and interest, even though the loans may currently be performing. The fair value of an impaired loan is determined based on an observable market price or current appraised value of the underlying collateral. The fair value of impaired loans with specific write-offs or allocations of the allowance for loan losses are generally based on recent real estate appraisals or internal valuation analyses consistent with the methodology used in real estate appraisals and include other third-party valuations and analysis of cash flows. These appraisals and analyses are updated at least on an annual basis. The Company primarily obtains real estate appraisals and in the rare cases where an appraisal cannot be obtained, the Company performs an internal valuation analysis. These appraisals and analyses may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and income approaches. The sales comparison approach uses at least three recent similar property sales to help determine the fair value of the property being appraised. The income approach is calculated by taking the net operating income generated by the collateral property of the rent collected and dividing it by an assumed capitalization rate. Adjustments are routinely made in the process by the appraisers to account for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. When measuring the fair value of the impaired loan based upon the projected sale of the underlying collateral, the Company subtracts the costs expected to be incurred for the transfer of the underlying collateral, which includes items such as sales commissions, delinquent taxes and insurance premiums. These adjustments to the estimated fair value of non-performing loans may result in increases or decreases to the provision for loan losses recorded in current earnings. Such adjustments are typically significant and result in a Level 3 classification for the inputs for determining fair value.
Other Real Estate Owned and Repossessed Vehicles
. Non-recurring adjustments to certain commercial and residential real estate properties classified as other real estate owned (“OREO”) are measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value, less estimated costs to sell. Fair values are generally based on third-party appraisals of the property, resulting in a Level 3 classification. In cases where the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, less costs to sell, an impairment loss is recognized.
Mortgage Servicing Rights.
The Company initially records all mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) at fair value and accounts for MSRs at fair value during the life of the MSR, with changes in fair value recorded through current period earnings. Fair value adjustments encompass market-driven valuation changes as well as modeled amortization involving the run-off of value that occurs due to the passage of time as individual loans are paid by borrowers. Market expectations about loan duration, and correspondingly the expected term of future servicing cash flows, may vary from time to time due to changes in expected prepayment activity, especially when interest rates rise or fall. Market expectations of increased loan prepayment speeds may negatively impact the fair value of the single family MSRs. Fair value is also dependent on the discount rate used in calculating present value, which is imputed from observable market activity and market participants and results in Level 3 classification. Management reviews and adjusts the discount rate on an ongoing basis. An increase in the discount rate would reduce the estimated fair value of the MSRs asset.
9
Table of Contents
Mortgage Banking Derivatives.
Level 3 fair values for mortgage banking derivatives are either based upon prices in active secondary markets for identical securities or based on quoted market prices of similar assets used to form a dealer quote or a pricing matrix. If no such quoted price exists, the fair value of a commitment is determined by quoted prices for a similar commitment or commitments, adjusted for the specific attributes of each commitment. These fair values are then adjusted for items such as fallout and estimated costs to originate the loan.
The Company’s valuation methodologies may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. While management believes the Company’s valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with or, in some cases, more conservative than other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the relevant reporting date.
10
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at
September 30, 2014
and
June 30, 2014
. Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement:
September 30, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
ASSETS:
Securities—Trading: Collateralized Debt Obligations
$
—
$
—
$
8,187
$
8,187
Securities—Available-for-Sale:
Agency RMBS
—
57,260
—
57,260
Non-Agency RMBS
—
—
34,171
34,171
Municipal
—
29,285
—
29,285
Other Debt Securities
—
85,064
—
85,064
Total—Securities—Available-for-Sale
$
—
$
171,609
$
34,171
$
205,780
Loans Held for Sale
$
—
$
18,021
$
—
$
18,021
Mortgage Servicing Rights
$
—
$
—
$
749
$
749
Other assets – Derivative Instruments
$
—
$
—
$
1,058
$
1,058
LIABILITIES:
Other liabilities – Derivative Instruments
$
—
$
—
$
115
$
115
June 30, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
ASSETS:
Securities—Trading: Collateralized Debt Obligations
$
—
$
—
$
8,066
$
8,066
Securities—Available-for-Sale:
Agency RMBS
—
59,880
—
59,880
Non-Agency RMBS
—
—
37,409
37,409
Municipal
—
28,943
—
28,943
Other Debt Securities
—
88,546
—
88,546
Total—Securities—Available-for-Sale
$
—
$
177,369
$
37,409
$
214,778
Loans Held for Sale
$
—
$
20,575
$
—
$
20,575
Mortgage Servicing Rights
$
—
$
—
$
562
$
562
Other assets – Derivative Instruments
$
—
$
—
$
1,364
$
1,364
LIABILITIES:
Other liabilities – Derivative Instruments
$
—
$
—
$
489
$
489
11
Table of Contents
The following tables present additional information about assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and for which the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value:
For the Three Months Ended
September 30, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Securities – Trading: Collateralized Debt Obligations
Securities – Available-for-Sale: Non-Agency RMBS
Mortgage Servicing Rights
Derivative Instruments, net
Total
Assets:
Opening Balance
$
8,066
$
37,409
$
562
$
875
$
46,912
Transfers into Level 3
—
—
—
—
—
Transfers out of Level 3
—
—
—
—
—
Total gains or losses for the period:
—
Included in earnings—Sale of mortgage-backed securities
—
—
—
—
—
Included in earnings—Fair value gain (loss) on trading securities
121
—
—
—
121
Included in earnings—Mortgage banking
—
—
3
68
71
Included in other comprehensive income
—
(138
)
—
—
(138
)
Purchases, issues, sales and settlements:
—
Purchases
—
—
184
—
184
Issues
—
—
—
—
—
Sales
—
—
—
—
—
Settlements
—
(3,051
)
—
—
(3,051
)
Other-than-temporary impairment
—
(49
)
—
—
(49
)
Closing balance
$
8,187
$
34,171
$
749
$
943
$
44,050
Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings for assets held at the end of the reporting period
$
121
$
—
$
3
$
68
$
192
For the Three Months Ended
September 30, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)
Securities – Trading: Collateralized Debt Obligations
Securities – Available-for-Sale: Non-Agency RMBS
Mortgage Servicing Rights
Derivative Instruments, net
Total
Assets:
Opening Balance
$
7,111
$
49,284
$
—
$
2,222
$
58,617
Transfers into Level 3
—
—
—
—
—
Transfers out of Level 3
—
—
—
—
—
Total gains or losses for the period:
Included in earnings—Sale of mortgage-backed securities
—
—
—
—
—
Included in earnings—Fair value gain (loss) on trading securities
623
—
—
—
623
Included in earnings—Mortgage banking
—
—
—
(1,900
)
(1,900
)
Included in other comprehensive income
—
445
—
—
445
Purchases, issues, sales and settlements:
Purchases
—
—
—
—
—
Issues
—
—
—
—
—
Sales
—
—
—
—
—
Settlements
—
(4,949
)
—
—
(4,949
)
Other-than-temporary impairment
—
—
—
—
—
Closing balance
$
7,734
$
44,780
$
—
$
322
$
52,836
Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings for assets held at the end of the reporting period
$
623
$
—
$
—
$
(1,900
)
$
(1,277
)
12
Table of Contents
The table below summarizes the quantitative information about level 3 fair value measurements at the periods indicated:
September 30, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Fair Value
Valuation Technique
Unobservable Input
Range (Weighted Average)
Securities – Trading:
Collateralized Debt Obligations
$
8,187
Discounted Cash Flow
Total Projected Defaults,
Discount Rate over Treasury
18.8 to 31.5% (25.5%)
4.3 to 4.3% (4.3%)
Securities – Available-for-Sale:
Non-agency RMBS
$
34,171
Discounted Cash Flow
Constant Prepayment Rate,
Constant Default Rate,
Loss Severity,
Discount Rate over LIBOR
0.2 to 44.1% (10.1%)
0.0 to 22.8% (5.6%)
31.5 to 97.5% (62.3%)
2.4 to 7.0% (4.7%)
Mortgage Servicing Rights
$
750
Discounted Cash Flow
Constant Prepayment Rate,
Life (in years),
Discount Rate
4.9 to 13.4% (7.2%)
4.0 to 8.4 (7.2)
10.0 to 11.5% (10.1%)
Derivative Instruments, net
$
943
Sales Comparison Approach
Projected Sales Profit of Underlying Loans
0.5 to 1.5%
June 30, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Fair Value
Valuation Technique
Unobservable Input
Range (Weighted Average)
Securities – Trading:
Collateralized Debt Obligations
$
8,066
Discounted Cash Flow
Total Projected Defaults,
Discount Rate over Treasury
19.0 to 26.6% (23.1%)
4.0 to 4.0% (4.0%)
Securities – Available-for-Sale:
Non-agency RMBS
$
37,409
Discounted Cash Flow
Constant Prepayment Rate,
Constant Default Rate,
Loss Severity,
Discount Rate over LIBOR
0.1 to 27.8 (10.0%)
0.0 to 21.7% (5.6%)
1.6 to 87.9% (61.7%)
2.5 to 8.4% (5.2%)
Mortgage Servicing Rights
$
562
Discounted Cash Flow
Constant Prepayment Rate,
Life (in years),
Discount Rate
5.6 to 7.4% (7.4%)
3.6 to 8.3% (7.1)
10.0 to 11.5% (10.1%)
Derivative Instruments, net
$
875
Sales Comparison Approach
Projected Sales Profit of Underlying Loans
0.5 to 1.5%
The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s residential mortgage-backed securities are prepayment rates, probability of default, and loss severity in the event of default. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. Generally, a change in the assumption used for the probability of default is accompanied by a directionally similar change in the assumption used for the loss severity and a directionally opposite change in the assumption used for prepayment rates.
The table below summarizes changes in unrealized gains and losses and interest income recorded in earnings for level 3 trading assets and liabilities that are still held at the periods indicated:
For the Three Months Ended
September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)
2014
2013
Interest income on investments
$
56
$
58
Fair value adjustment
121
623
Total
$
177
$
681
13
Table of Contents
The table below summarizes assets measured for impairment on a non-recurring basis:
September 30, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Balance
Impaired Loans:
Single Family real estate secured:
Mortgage
$
—
$
—
$
14,355
$
14,355
Home Equity
—
—
15
15
Multifamily real estate secured
—
—
6,244
6,244
Commercial real estate secured
—
—
4,309
4,309
Auto and RV secured
—
—
462
462
Total
$
—
$
—
$
25,385
$
25,385
Other real estate owned and repossessed vehicles:
Single Family real estate secured:
Mortgage
$
—
$
—
$
47
$
47
Auto and RV secured
—
—
165
165
Total
$
—
$
—
$
212
$
212
HTM Securities – Non-Agency RMBS
$
—
$
—
$
90,976
$
90,976
June 30, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Balance
Impaired Loans:
Single Family real estate secured:
Mortgage
$
—
$
—
$
13,385
$
13,385
Home Equity
—
—
168
168
Multifamily real estate secured
—
—
4,301
4,301
Commercial real estate secured
—
—
4,376
4,376
Auto and RV secured
—
—
534
534
Total
$
—
$
—
$
22,764
$
22,764
Other real estate owned and foreclosed assets:
Auto and RV secured
—
—
75
75
Total
$
—
$
—
$
75
$
75
HTM Securities – Non-Agency RMBS
$
—
$
—
$
91,297
$
91,297
Impaired loans measured for impairment on a non-recurring basis using the fair value of the collateral for collateral-dependent loans have a carrying amount of
$25,385
, after charge-offs of
$338
for the
three months ended
September 30, 2014
, and life to date charge-offs of
$5,802
. Impaired loans had a related allowance of
$258
at
September 30, 2014
.
Other real estate owned and foreclosed assets, which are measured at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell, had a net carrying amount of
$212
after charge-offs of
$12
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
. Our other real estate owned and foreclosed assets had a net carrying amount of
$75
after charge-offs of
$0
during the year ended
June 30, 2014
.
Held-to-maturity securities measured for impairment on a non-recurring basis had a fair value of
$90,976
and a carrying amount of
$91,320
at
September 30, 2014
, after net impairment charges to income of
$1,164
and changes to other comprehensive income of
$2,280
during the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
. The Company recognized net impairment charges to income
14
Table of Contents
of
$572
and changes in other comprehensive loss of
$1,078
for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2013
. These held-to-maturity securities are valued using Level 3 inputs.
The Company has elected the fair value option for Agency loans held for sale. These loans are intended for sale and the Company believes that the fair value is the best indicator of the resolution of these loans. Interest income is recorded based on the contractual terms of the loan and in accordance with the Company’s policy on loans held for investment. None of these loans are 90 days or more past due nor on nonaccrual as of
September 30, 2014
and
June 30, 2014
.
As of
September 30, 2014
and
June 30, 2014
, the aggregate fair value, contractual balance (including accrued interest), and gain was as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
September 30, 2014
June 30, 2014
Aggregate fair value
$
18,021
$
20,575
Contractual balance
17,632
20,138
Gain
$
389
$
437
The total amount of gains and losses from changes in fair value included in earnings for the period indicated below for loans held for sale were:
For the Three Months Ended
September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)
2014
2013
Interest income
$
153
$
195
Change in fair value
23
(2,023
)
Total
$
176
$
(1,828
)
15
Table of Contents
The following table presents quantitative information about level 3 fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at the periods indicated:
September 30, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Fair Value
Valuation Technique(s)
Unobservable Input
Range (Weighted Average)
1
Impaired loans:
Single Family real estate secured:
Mortgage
$
14,355
Sales comparison approach
Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales
-34.2 to 29.5% (-3.0%)
Home Equity
$
15
Sales comparison approach
Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales
-48.6 to 11.1% (-3.1%)
Multifamily real estate secured
$
6,244
Sales comparison approach and income approach
Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales and adjustments for differences in net operating income expectations, Capitalization rate
-58.6 to 43.6% (-19.8%)
Commercial real estate secured
$
4,309
Sales comparison approach and income approach
Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales and adjustments for differences in net operating income expectations, Capitalization rate
-74.5 to 42.9% (-16.8%)
Auto and RV secured
$
462
Sales comparison approach
Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales
-4.1 to 27.3% (10.2%)
Other real estate owned:
Single Family real estate secured:
Mortgage
$
47
Sales comparison approach
Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales
-9.6 to 24.8% (7.6%)
Auto and RV secured
$
165
Sales comparison approach
Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales
0.0 to 22.2% (10.2%)
HTM Securities – Non-Agency RMBS
$
90,976
Discounted cash flow
Constant prepayment rate,
constant default rate,
loss severity,
discount rate over LIBOR
2.0 to 29.7% (10.3%)
0.0 to 16.5% (5.9%)
31.5 to 76.8% (62.5%)
2.4 to 7.0% (5.5%)
_____________________
1
For impaired loans and other real estate owned the ranges shown may vary positively or negatively based on the comparable sales reported in the current appraisal. In certain instances, the range can be significant due to small sample sizes and in some cases the property being valued having limited comparable sales with similar characteristics at the time the current appraisal is conducted.
June 30, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Fair Value
Valuation Technique(s)
Unobservable Input
Range (Weighted Average)
1
Impaired loans:
Single Family real estate secured:
Mortgage
$
13,385
Sales comparison approach
Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales
-28.7 to 35.1% (1.3%)
Home Equity
$
168
Sales comparison approach
Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales
-20.0 to 42.7% (10.1%)
Multifamily real estate secured
$
4,301
Sales comparison approach and income approach
Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales and adjustments for differences in net operating income expectations, Capitalization rate
-43.3 to 65.0% (13.1%)
Commercial real estate secured
$
4,376
Sales comparison approach and income approach
Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales and adjustments for differences in net operating income expectations, Capitalization rate
-84.1 to 82.4% (-22.1%)
Auto and RV secured
$
534
Sales comparison approach
Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales
0.0 to 27.4% (10.3%)
Other real estate owned:
Auto and RV secured
$
75
Sales comparison approach
Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales
-84.0 to 41.3% (-32.8%)
HTM Securities – Non-Agency RMBS
$
91,297
Discounted cash flow
Constant prepayment rate,
constant default rate,
loss severity,
discount rate over LIBOR
0.1 to 16.3% (10.2%)
0.0 to 11.1% (5.9%)
3.5 to 76.5% (61.2%)
2.7 to 8.4% (6.2%)
_____________________
16
Table of Contents
1
For impaired loans and other real estate owned the ranges shown may vary positively or negatively based on the comparable sales reported in the current appraisal. In certain instances, the range can be significant due to small sample sizes and in some cases the property being valued having limited comparable sales with similar characteristics at the time the current appraisal is conducted.
17
Table of Contents
Fair value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments at the periods indicated:
September 30, 2014
Fair Value
(Dollars in thousands)
Carrying
Amount
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
198,260
$
198,260
$
—
$
—
$
198,260
Securities trading
8,187
—
—
8,187
8,187
Securities available-for-sale
205,780
—
34,171
171,609
205,780
Securities held-to-maturity
243,402
—
88,818
153,349
242,167
Loans held for sale, at fair value
18,021
—
18,021
—
18,021
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or fair value
72,719
—
—
72,755
72,755
Loans held for investment—net
3,959,155
—
—
4,050,781
4,050,781
Accrued interest receivable
15,368
—
—
15,368
15,368
Financial liabilities:
Time deposits and savings
3,261,756
—
3,290,540
—
3,290,540
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
35,000
—
38,338
—
38,338
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
1,075,000
—
1,079,472
—
1,079,472
Subordinated debentures and other borrowings
5,155
—
5,281
—
5,281
Accrued interest payable
1,195
—
1,195
—
1,195
Carrying amount and estimated fair values of financial instruments at period-end were as follows:
June 30, 2014
Fair Value
(Dollars in thousands)
Carrying
Amount
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
155,584
$
155,584
$
—
$
—
$
155,584
Securities trading
8,066
—
—
8,066
8,066
Securities available-for-sale
214,778
—
177,369
37,409
214,778
Securities held-to-maturity
247,729
—
89,408
154,557
243,965
Stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank
—
—
—
—
NA
Loans held for sale, at fair value
20,575
—
20,575
20,575
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or fair value
114,796
—
—
114,840
114,840
Loans held for investment—net
3,532,841
—
—
3,632,841
3,632,841
Accrued interest receivable
13,863
—
—
13,863
13,863
Financial liabilities:
Time deposits and savings
3,041,536
—
3,066,830
—
3,066,830
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
45,000
—
48,883
—
48,883
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
910,000
—
917,184
—
917,184
Subordinated debentures and other borrowings
5,155
—
5,284
—
5,284
Accrued interest payable
1,350
—
1,350
—
1,350
18
Table of Contents
The methods and assumptions, not previously presented, used to estimate fair value are described as follows: Carrying amount is the estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents, interest bearing deposits, accrued interest receivable and payable, demand deposits, short-term debt, and variable rate loans or deposits that reprice frequently and fully. For fixed rate loans, deposits, borrowings or subordinated debt and for variable rate loans, deposits, borrowings or subordinated debt with infrequent repricing or repricing limits, fair value is based on discounted cash flows using current market rates applied to the estimated life and credit risk. A discussion of the methods of valuing trading securities, available for sale securities and loans held for sale can be found earlier in this footnote. The carrying amount of stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) approximates the estimated fair value of this investment. The fair value of off-balance sheet items is not considered material.
4.
SECURITIES
The amortized cost, carrying amount and fair value for the major categories of securities trading, available-for-sale, and held-to-maturity at
September 30, 2014
and
June 30, 2014
were:
September 30, 2014
Trading
Available-for-sale
Held-to-maturity
(Dollars in thousands)
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
Unrealized
Gains
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Carrying
Amount
Unrecognized
Gains
Unrecognized
Losses
Fair
Value
Mortgage-backed securities (RMBS):
U.S. agencies
1
$
—
$
57,409
$
1,112
$
(1,261
)
$
57,260
$
46,794
$
1,759
$
—
$
48,553
Non-agency
2
—
30,422
3,940
(191
)
34,171
160,575
6,824
(14,051
)
153,348
Total mortgage-backed securities
—
87,831
5,052
(1,452
)
91,431
207,369
8,583
(14,051
)
201,901
Other debt securities:
U.S. agencies
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Municipal
—
28,443
842
—
29,285
36,033
4,233
—
40,266
Non-agency
8,187
83,665
1,428
(29
)
85,064
—
—
—
—
Total other debt securities
8,187
112,108
2,270
(29
)
114,349
36,033
4,233
—
40,266
Total debt securities
$
8,187
$
199,939
$
7,322
$
(1,481
)
$
205,780
$
243,402
$
12,816
$
(14,051
)
$
242,167
June 30, 2014
Trading
Available-for-sale
Held-to-maturity
(Dollars in thousands)
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
Unrealized
Gains
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Carrying
Amount
Unrecognized
Gains
Unrecognized
Losses
Fair
Value
Mortgage-backed securities (RMBS):
U.S. agencies
1
$
—
$
60,670
$
1,060
$
(1,850
)
$
59,880
$
47,982
$
1,895
$
—
$
49,877
Non-agency
2
—
33,521
4,077
(189
)
37,409
163,695
6,352
(15,490
)
154,557
Total mortgage-backed securities
—
94,191
5,137
(2,039
)
97,289
211,677
8,247
(15,490
)
204,434
Other debt securities:
U.S. agencies
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Municipal
—
28,522
425
(4
)
28,943
36,052
3,480
—
39,532
Non-agency
8,066
87,913
687
(54
)
88,546
—
—
—
—
Total other debt securities
8,066
116,435
1,112
(58
)
117,489
36,052
3,480
—
39,532
Total debt securities
$
8,066
$
210,626
$
6,249
$
(2,097
)
$
214,778
$
247,729
$
11,727
$
(15,490
)
$
243,966
__________________________________
1.
U.S. government-backed or government sponsored enterprises including Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae.
2.
Private sponsors of securities collateralized primarily by pools of 1-4 family residential first mortgages. Primarily super senior securities secured by prime, Alt-A or pay-option ARM mortgages.
The Company’s non-agency RMBS available-for-sale portfolio with a total fair value of
$34,171
at
September 30, 2014
consists of
twenty-two
different issues of super senior securities with a fair value of
$22,252
;
one
senior structured whole loan security with a fair value of
$11,638
and
three
mezzanine z-tranche securities with a fair value of
$281
collateralized by seasoned prime and Alt-A first-lien mortgages. The Company acquired its mezzanine z-tranche securities in fiscal 2009 and accounts for them by measuring the excess
19
Table of Contents
of cash flows expected at acquisition over the purchase price (accretable yield) and recognizes interest income over the remaining life of the security.
The non-agency RMBS held-to-maturity portfolio with a carrying value of
$160,575
at
September 30, 2014
consists of
78
different issues of super senior securities totaling
$158,450
and
one
senior-support security with a carrying value of
$2,125
. Debt securities with evidence of credit quality deterioration since issuance and for which it is probable at purchase that the Company will be unable to collect all of the par value of the security are accounted for under ASC Topic 310,
Accounting for Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality
(“ASC Topic 310”). Under ASC Topic 310, the excess of cash flows expected at acquisition over the purchase price is referred to as the accretable yield and is recognized in interest income over the remaining life of the security. The Company has
one
senior support security that it acquired at a significant discount that evidenced credit deterioration at acquisition and is accounted for under ASC Topic 310. For a cost of
$17,740
the Company acquired the senior support security with a contractual par value of
$30,560
and accretable and non-accretable discounts that were projected to be
$9,015
and
$3,805
, respectively. Since acquisition, repayments from the security have been received more rapidly than projected at acquisition, but expected total payments have declined, resulting in a determination that the security was other-than-temporarily impaired and a charge of
$572
was recorded for the fiscal
2014
year and a charge of
$0
for the
three months
ended
September 30, 2014
. At
September 30, 2014
the security had a remaining contractual par value of
zero
and amortizable and non-amortizable premium are currently projected to be
zero
and
$2,472
, respectively.
The current face amounts of debt securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity that were pledged to secure borrowings at
September 30, 2014
and
June 30, 2014
were
$41,124
and
$67,605
respectively.
20
Table of Contents
The securities with unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position were as follows:
September 30, 2014
Available-for-sale securities in loss position for
Held-to-maturity securities in loss position for
Less Than
12 Months
More Than
12 Months
Total
Less Than
12 Months
More Than
12 Months
Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
RMBS:
U.S. agencies
$
—
$
—
$
25,932
$
(1,261
)
$
25,932
$
(1,261
)
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
Non-agency
2,614
—
2,311
(191
)
4,925
(191
)
10,187
(129
)
67,710
(13,922
)
77,897
(14,051
)
Total RMBS securities
2,614
—
28,243
(1,452
)
30,857
(1,452
)
10,187
(129
)
67,710
(13,922
)
77,897
(14,051
)
Other Debt:
U.S. agencies
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Municipal Debt
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Non-agency
15,119
(29
)
—
—
15,119
(29
)
—
—
—
—
—
—
Total Other Debt
15,119
(29
)
—
—
15,119
(29
)
—
—
—
—
—
—
Total debt securities
$
17,733
$
(29
)
$
28,243
$
(1,452
)
$
45,976
$
(1,481
)
$
10,187
$
(129
)
$
67,710
$
(13,922
)
$
77,897
$
(14,051
)
June 30, 2014
Available-for-sale securities in loss position for
Held-to-maturity securities in loss position for
Less Than
12 Months
More Than
12 Months
Total
Less Than
12 Months
More Than
12 Months
Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
RMBS:
U.S. agencies
$
—
$
—
$
25,498
$
(1,850
)
$
25,498
$
(1,850
)
$
—
$
—
$
1
$
—
$
1
$
—
Non-agency
1,819
(33
)
2,402
(157
)
4,221
(190
)
5,871
(400
)
66,974
(15,090
)
72,845
(15,490
)
Total RMBS securities
1,819
(33
)
27,900
(2,007
)
29,719
(2,040
)
5,871
(400
)
66,975
(15,090
)
72,846
(15,490
)
Other Debt:
U.S. agencies
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Municipal Debt
47
—
2,257
(3
)
2,304
(3
)
—
—
—
—
—
—
Non-agency
5,365
(48
)
1,389
(6
)
6,754
(54
)
—
—
—
—
—
—
Total Other Debt
5,412
(48
)
3,646
(9
)
9,058
(57
)
—
—
—
—
—
—
Total debt securities
$
7,231
$
(81
)
$
31,546
$
(2,016
)
$
38,777
$
(2,097
)
$
5,871
$
(400
)
$
66,975
$
(15,090
)
$
72,846
$
(15,490
)
21
Table of Contents
There were
36
securities that were in a continuous loss position at
September 30, 2014
for a period of more than
12 months
. There were
35
securities that were in a continuous loss position at
June 30, 2014
for a period of more than
12 months
. The following table summarizes amounts of credit loss recognized in the income statement through other-than-temporary impairment charges which reduced non-interest income:
For the Three Months Ended
September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)
2014
2013
Beginning balance
$
(18,138
)
$
(15,336
)
Additions for the amounts related to credit loss for which an other-than-temporary impairment was not previously recognized
(39
)
—
Increases to the amount related to the credit loss for which other-than-temporary impairment was previously recognized
(1,174
)
(572
)
Ending balance
$
(19,351
)
$
(15,908
)
At
September 30, 2014
, non-agency RMBS with a total carrying amount of
$102,090
were determined to have cumulative credit losses of
$19,351
of which
$1,213
was recognized in earnings during the three months ended
September 30, 2014
. This quarter’s other-than-temporary impairment of
$1,213
is related to
ten
non-agency RMBS with a total carrying amount of
$20,827
. The Company measures its non-agency RMBS in an unrecognized loss position at the end of the reporting period for other-than-temporary impairment by comparing the present value of the cash flows currently expected to be collected from the security with its amortized cost basis. If the calculated present value is lower than the amortized cost, the difference is the credit component of an other-than-temporary impairment of its debt securities. The excess of present value over the fair value of the security (if any) is the non-credit component only if the Company does not intend to sell the security and will not be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. The credit component of the other-than-temporary impairment is recorded as a loss in earnings and the non-credit component as a charge to other comprehensive income, net of the related income tax benefit.
To determine the cash flow expected to be collected and to calculate the present value for purposes of testing for other-than-temporary impairment, the Company utilizes the same industry-standard tool and the same cash flows as those calculated for Level 3 fair values as discussed in Note 3 – Fair Value. The discount rates used to compute the present value of the expected cash flows for purposes of testing for the credit component of the other-than-temporary impairment are either the implicit rate calculated in each of the Company’s securities at acquisition or the last accounting yield. The Company calculates the implicit rate at acquisition based on the contractual terms of the security, considering scheduled payments (and minimum payments in the case of pay-option ARMs) without prepayment assumptions. Once the discount rate (or discount margin in the case of floating rate securities) is calculated as described above, the discount is used in the industry-standard model to calculate the present value of the cash flows.
During the
three months
ended
September 30, 2014
, there were no security sales.
22
Table of Contents
The Company had recorded unrealized gains and unrealized losses in accumulated other comprehensive loss as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
September 30,
2014
June 30,
2014
Available-for-sale debt securities—net unrealized gains
$
5,842
$
4,151
Held-to-maturity debt securities—non-credit related
(19,153
)
(21,433
)
Subtotal
(13,311
)
(17,282
)
Tax benefit
5,229
6,916
Net unrealized loss on investment securities in accumulated other comprehensive loss
$
(8,082
)
$
(10,366
)
The expected maturity distribution of the Company’s mortgage-backed securities and the contractual maturity distribution of the Company’s other debt securities classified as available-for-sale and held-to-maturity at
September 30, 2014
were:
September 30, 2014
Trading
Available for sale
Held-to-maturity
(Dollars in thousands)
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value
RMBS—U.S. agencies
1
:
Due within one year
$
—
$
5,222
$
5,094
$
1,575
$
1,640
Due one to five years
—
16,338
16,039
6,005
6,251
Due five to ten years
—
13,714
13,645
6,766
7,038
Due after ten years
—
22,135
22,482
32,448
33,624
Total RMBS—U.S. agencies
1
—
57,409
57,260
46,794
48,553
RMBS—Non-agency:
Due within one year
—
5,803
6,408
19,051
18,689
Due one to five years
—
15,312
16,973
50,950
49,955
Due five to ten years
—
6,772
7,782
36,724
35,216
Due after ten years
8,187
2,535
3,008
53,850
49,488
Total RMBS—Non-agency
8,187
30,422
34,171
160,575
153,348
Other debt:
Due within one year
—
20,547
20,691
910
1,013
Due one to five years
—
68,814
70,250
4,227
4,703
Due five to ten years
—
12,145
12,425
6,635
7,388
Due after ten years
—
10,602
10,983
24,261
27,162
Total other debt
—
112,108
114,349
36,033
40,266
Total
$
8,187
$
199,939
$
205,780
$
243,402
$
242,167
__________________________
1.
RMBS distributions include impact of expected prepayments and other timing factors.
23
Table of Contents
5.
LOANS & ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
The following table sets forth the composition of the loan portfolio as of the dates indicated:
(Dollars in thousands)
September 30, 2014
June 30, 2014
Single family real estate secured:
Mortgage
$
2,236,370
$
1,918,626
Home equity
4,386
12,690
Warehouse and other
1
357,050
370,717
Multifamily real estate secured
1,103,799
978,511
Commercial real estate secured
21,579
24,061
Auto and RV secured
14,022
14,740
Factoring
132,077
118,945
Commercial & Industrial
152,894
152,619
Other
607
1,971
Total gross loans
4,022,784
3,592,880
Allowance for loan losses
(20,495
)
(18,373
)
Unaccreted discounts and loan fees
(43,134
)
(41,666
)
Total net loans
$
3,959,155
$
3,532,841
__________________________________
1.
The balance of single family warehouse loans was
$80,764
at
September 30, 2014
and
$92,920
at
June 30, 2014
. The remainder of the balance is attributable to single family lender finance loans.
Allowance for Loan Losses.
The Company’s goal is to maintain the allowance for loan losses (sometimes referred to as the allowance) at a level that is considered to be commensurate with estimated probable incurred credit losses in the portfolio. Although the adequacy of the allowance is reviewed quarterly, management performs an ongoing assessment of the risks inherent in the portfolio. While the Company believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate at
September 30, 2014
, future additions to the allowance will be subject to continuing evaluation of estimated and known, as well as inherent, risks in the loan portfolio.
Allowance for Loan Loss Disclosures—
The assessment of the adequacy of the Company’s allowance for loan losses is based upon a number of quantitative and qualitative factors, including levels and trends of past due and nonaccrual loans, change in volume and mix of loans, collateral values and charge-off history.
The Company provides general loan loss reserves for its recreational vehicle (“RV”) and auto loans based upon the borrower credit score at the time of origination and the Company’s loss experience to date. The allowance for loan loss for the RV and auto loan portfolio at
September 30, 2014
was determined by classifying each outstanding loan according to semi-annually refreshed FICO score and providing loss rates. The Company had
$13,560
of RV and auto loan balances subject to general reserves as follows: FICO greater than or equal to 770:
$3,421
; 715 – 769:
$4,502
; 700 – 714:
$1,043
; 660 – 699:
$2,401
and less than 660:
$2,193
.
The Company provides general loan loss reserves for mortgage loans based upon the size and class of the mortgage loan and the loan-to-value ratio (“LTV”) at date of origination. The allowance for each class is determined by dividing the outstanding unpaid balance for each loan by the loan-to-value and applying a loss rates. The LTV groupings for each significant mortgage class are as follows:
The Company had
$2,222,015
of single family mortgage portfolio loan balances subject to general reserves as follows: LTV less than or equal to 60%:
$1,290,619
; 61% – 70%:
$775,927
; 71% – 80%:
$132,293
; and greater than 80%:
$23,176
.
The Company had
$1,097,555
of multifamily mortgage portfolio loan balances subject to general reserves as follows: LTV less than or equal to 55%:
$496,006
; 56% – 65%:
$359,799
; 66% – 75%:
$227,964
; 76% – 80%:
$11,077
and greater than 80%:
$2,709
. The Company divides the LTV analysis into two classes, separating the purchased loans from the loans underwritten directly by the Company. Based on historical performance, the Company concluded that originated multifamily loans require lower estimated loss rates.
The Company had
$17,271
of commercial real estate loan balances subject to general reserves as follows: LTV less than or equal to 50%:
$9,230
; 51% – 60%:
$5,715
; 61% – 70%:
$1,425
; and 71% – 80%:
$901
.
The Company’s lender finance portfolio consists of business loans well-collateralized by residential real estate. The Company’s commercial & industrial portfolio consists of business loans well-collateralized by business assets. The Company’s other portfolio consists of receivables factoring and other consumer loans. The Company allocates its allowance for loan loss for these asset types based on qualitative factors which consider the value of the collateral and the financial position of the issuer of the receivables.
24
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio classes for the periods indicated:
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2014
Single Family Real Estate Secured
(Dollars in thousands)
Mortgage
Home Equity
Warehouse & Other
Multifamily Real Estate Secured
Commercial Real Estate Secured
Auto and RV Secured
Factoring
Commercial & Industrial
Other/Consumer
Total
Balance at July 1, 2014
$
7,959
$
134
$
1,259
$
3,785
$
1,035
$
812
$
279
$
3,048
$
62
$
18,373
Provision for loan loss
1,882
(24
)
(43
)
537
(70
)
401
32
(166
)
(49
)
2,500
Charge-offs
(37
)
—
—
(300
)
—
(71
)
—
—
—
(408
)
Recoveries
3
3
—
—
—
18
—
—
6
30
Balance at September 30, 2014
$
9,807
$
113
$
1,216
$
4,022
$
965
$
1,160
$
311
$
2,882
$
19
$
20,495
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013
Single Family Real Estate Secured
(Dollars in thousands)
Mortgage
Home Equity
Warehouse & Other
Multifamily Real Estate Secured
Commercial Real Estate Secured
Auto and RV Secured
Factoring
Commercial & Industrial
Other/Consumer
Total
Balance at July 1, 2013
$
4,812
$
183
$
1,250
$
3,186
$
1,378
$
1,536
$
201
$
1,623
$
13
$
14,182
Provision for loan loss
704
(38
)
(360
)
681
(383
)
(216
)
(6
)
(134
)
252
500
Charge-offs
(98
)
—
—
—
—
(30
)
—
—
(26
)
(154
)
Recoveries
—
7
—
—
—
5
—
—
6
18
Balance at September 30, 2013
$
5,418
$
152
$
890
$
3,867
$
995
$
1,295
$
195
$
1,489
$
245
$
14,546
25
Table of Contents
The following table presents our loans evaluated individually for impairment by class:
September 30, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Unpaid
Principal Balance
Principal Balance Adjustment
Unpaid Book Balance
Accrued Interest /
Origination Fees
Recorded Investment
Related Allowance
With no related allowance recorded:
Single Family Real Estate Secured:
Mortgage:
Purchased
$
8,332
$
2,275
$
6,057
$
229
$
6,286
$
—
Home Equity:
In-house originated
88
84
4
10
14
—
Multifamily Real Estate Secured:
Purchased
3,611
1,090
2,521
—
2,521
—
Commercial Real Estate Secured:
Purchased
3,667
1,319
2,348
143
2,491
—
Auto and RV Secured:
In-house originated
1,452
1,034
418
19
437
—
With an allowance recorded:
Single Family Real Estate Secured:
Mortgage:
In-house originated
5,792
—
5,792
46
5,838
212
Purchased
2,506
—
2,506
34
2,540
42
Home Equity:
In-house originated
12
—
12
—
12
—
Multifamily Real Estate Secured:
In-house originated
3,723
—
3,723
35
3,758
2
Commercial Real Estate Secured:
Purchased
1,960
—
1,960
—
1,960
1
Auto and RV Secured:
In-house originated
44
—
44
1
45
1
Total
$
31,187
$
5,802
$
25,385
$
517
$
25,902
$
258
As a % of total gross loans
0.78
%
0.14
%
0.63
%
0.01
%
0.64
%
0.01
%
June 30, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Unpaid Principal Balance
Principal Balance Adjustment
Unpaid Book Balance
Accrued Interest /
Origination Fees
Recorded Investment
Related Allowance
With no related allowance recorded:
Single Family Real Estate Secured:
Mortgage:
Purchased
$
7,413
$
2,189
$
5,224
$
223
$
5,447
$
—
Home Equity:
In-house originated
88
83
5
9
14
—
Multifamily Real Estate Secured:
In-house originated
2,615
746
1,869
5
1,874
—
Commercial Real Estate Secured:
Purchased
3,670
1,297
2,373
133
2,506
—
Auto and RV Secured:
In-house originated
1,561
1,072
489
27
516
—
With an allowance recorded:
Single Family Real Estate Secured:
Mortgage:
In-house originated
4,074
—
4,074
22
4,096
14
Purchased
4,087
—
4,087
53
4,140
19
Home Equity:
In-house originated
163
—
163
—
163
1
Multifamily Real Estate Secured:
In-house originated
2,307
—
2,307
22
2,329
3
Purchased
125
—
125
—
125
1
Commercial Real Estate Secured:
Purchased
2,003
—
2,003
2
2,005
38
Auto and RV Secured:
In-house originated
45
—
45
1
46
1
Total
$
28,151
$
5,387
$
22,764
$
497
$
23,261
$
77
As a % of total gross loans
0.78
%
0.15
%
0.63
%
0.01
%
0.65
%
—
%
26
Table of Contents
The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on impairment method:
September 30, 2014
Single Family Real Estate Secured
(Dollars in thousands)
Mortgage
Home
Equity
Warehouse and other
Multifamily Real Estate Secured
Commercial Real Estate Secured
Auto and RV Secured
Factoring
Commercial & Industrial
Other
Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment
$
254
$
—
$
—
$
2
$
1
$
1
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
258
Collectively evaluated for impairment
9,553
113
1,216
4,020
964
1,159
311
2,882
19
20,237
Total ending allowance balance
$
9,807
$
113
$
1,216
$
4,022
$
965
$
1,160
$
311
$
2,882
$
19
$
20,495
Loans:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment
1
$
14,355
$
16
$
—
$
6,244
$
4,308
$
462
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
25,385
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
2,222,015
4,370
357,050
1,097,555
17,271
13,560
132,077
152,894
607
3,997,399
Principal loan balance
2,236,370
4,386
357,050
1,103,799
21,579
14,022
132,077
152,894
607
4,022,784
Unaccreted discounts and loan fees
9,207
(12
)
(1,455
)
2,989
(35
)
194
(53,426
)
(596
)
—
(43,134
)
Accrued interest receivable
7,095
3
379
4,288
19
75
228
1,144
—
13,231
Total recorded investment in loans
$
2,252,672
$
4,377
$
355,974
$
1,111,076
$
21,563
$
14,291
$
78,879
$
153,442
$
607
$
3,992,881
________________
1.
Loans evaluated for impairment include Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”) that have been performing for more than
six months
.
June 30, 2014
Single Family Real Estate Secured
(Dollars in thousands)
Mortgage
Home
Equity
Warehouse and other
Multifamily Real Estate Secured
Commercial Real Estate
Secured
Auto and RV Secured
Factoring
Commercial & Industrial
Other
Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment
$
33
$
1
$
—
$
4
$
38
$
1
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
77
Collectively evaluated for impairment
4,779
182
1,250
3,182
1,340
1,535
201
1,623
13
14,105
Total ending allowance balance
$
4,812
$
183
$
1,250
$
3,186
$
1,378
$
1,536
$
201
$
1,623
$
13
$
14,182
Loans:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment
1
$
13,385
$
168
$
—
$
4,301
$
4,376
$
534
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
22,764
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
1,905,241
12,522
370,717
974,210
19,685
14,206
118,945
152,619
1,971
3,570,116
Principal loan balance
1,918,626
12,690
370,717
978,511
24,061
14,740
118,945
152,619
1,971
3,592,880
Unaccreted discounts and loan fees
7,138
(11
)
(2,055
)
2,336
(37
)
215
(48,546
)
(706
)
—
(41,666
)
Accrued interest receivable
5,947
39
433
3,704
45
74
163
825
—
11,230
Total recorded investment in loans
$
1,931,711
$
12,718
$
369,095
$
984,551
$
24,069
$
15,029
$
70,562
$
152,738
$
1,971
$
3,562,444
________________
1.
Loans evaluated for impairment include TDRs that have been performing for more than
six months
.
27
Table of Contents
Credit Quality Disclosures.
Non-performing loans consisted of the following:
(Dollars in thousands)
September 30,
2014
June 30,
2014
Single Family Real Estate Secured:
Mortgage:
In-house originated
$
5,792
$
4,073
Purchased
8,025
8,323
Home Equity:
In-house originated
15
168
Multifamily Real Estate Secured:
In-house originated
3,723
2,307
Purchased
2,521
1,995
Commercial Real Estate Secured:
Purchased
4,309
2,985
Total non-performing loans secured by real estate
24,385
19,851
Auto and RV Secured
462
534
Total non-performing loans
$
24,847
$
20,385
Non-performing loans to total loans
0.62
%
0.57
%
Approximately
21.19%
of our non-performing loans at
September 30, 2014
were considered TDRs, compared to
19.60%
at
June 30, 2014
. Borrowers that make timely payments after TDRs are considered non-performing for at least
six months
. The Bank has no loans over
90 days
delinquent that are still accruing at
September 30, 2014
.
Generally, after
six months
of timely payments, those TDRs are reclassified from the non-performing loan category to the performing loan category and any previously deferred interest income is recognized. Approximately
55.61%
of the Bank’s non-performing loans are single family first mortgages already written down to
45.75%
in aggregate, of the original appraisal value of the underlying properties. Generally these loans have experienced longer delays completing the foreclosure process due to the poor servicing practices of one of our seller servicers.
The following table provides the outstanding unpaid balance of loans that are performing and non-performing by portfolio class:
September 30, 2014
Single Family Real Estate Secured
(Dollars in thousands)
Mortgage
Home
Equity
Warehouse & other
Multifamily Real Estate Secured
Commercial Real Estate Secured
Auto and RV Secured
Factoring
Commercial & Industrial
Other
Total
Performing
$
2,222,553
$
4,371
$
357,050
$
1,097,555
$
17,270
$
13,560
$
132,077
$
152,894
$
607
$
3,997,937
Non-performing
13,817
15
—
6,244
4,309
462
—
—
—
24,847
Total
$
2,236,370
$
4,386
$
357,050
$
1,103,799
$
21,579
$
14,022
$
132,077
$
152,894
$
607
$
4,022,784
June 30, 2014
Single Family Real Estate Secured
(Dollars in thousands)
Mortgage
Home
Equity
Warehouse & other
Multifamily Real Estate Secured
Commercial Real Estate Secured
Auto and RV Secured
Factoring
Commercial & Industrial
Other
Total
Performing
$
1,906,230
$
12,522
$
370,717
$
974,209
$
21,076
$
14,206
$
118,945
$
152,619
$
1,971
$
3,572,495
Non-performing
12,396
168
—
4,302
2,985
534
—
—
—
20,385
Total
$
1,918,626
$
12,690
$
370,717
$
978,511
$
24,061
$
14,740
$
118,945
$
152,619
$
1,971
$
3,592,880
28
Table of Contents
The Company divides loan balances when determining general loan loss reserves between purchases and originations as follows:
September 30, 2014
Single Family Real Estate Secured: Mortgage
Multifamily Real Estate Secured
Commercial Real Estate Secured
(Dollars in thousands)
Origination
Purchase
Total
Origination
Purchase
Total
Origination
Purchase
Total
Performing
$
2,118,695
$
103,858
$
2,222,553
$
949,240
$
148,315
$
1,097,555
$
6,102
$
11,168
$
17,270
Non-performing
5,792
8,025
13,817
3,723
2,521
6,244
—
4,309
4,309
Total
$
2,124,487
$
111,883
$
2,236,370
$
952,963
$
150,836
$
1,103,799
$
6,102
$
15,477
$
21,579
June 30, 2014
Single Family Real Estate Secured: Mortgage
Multifamily Real Estate Secured
Commercial Real Estate Secured
(Dollars in thousands)
Origination
Purchase
Total
Origination
Purchase
Total
Origination
Purchase
Total
Performing
$
1,797,526
$
108,704
$
1,906,230
$
816,682
$
157,527
$
974,209
$
6,164
$
14,912
$
21,076
Non-performing
4,073
8,323
12,396
2,307
1,995
4,302
—
2,985
2,985
Total
$
1,801,599
$
117,027
$
1,918,626
$
818,989
$
159,522
$
978,511
$
6,164
$
17,897
$
24,061
From time to time the Company modifies loan terms temporarily for borrowers who are experiencing financial stress. These loans are performing and accruing and will generally return to the original loan terms after the modification term expires.
The Company classifies these loans as performing loans temporarily modified as TDR and are included in impaired loans as follows:
September 30, 2014
Single Family Real Estate Secured
(Dollars in thousands)
Mortgage
Home
Equity
Warehouse & other
Multifamily Real Estate Secured
Commercial Real Estate Secured
Auto and RV Secured
Factoring
Commercial & Industrial
Other
Total
Performing loans temporarily modified as TDR
$
538
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
538
Non-performing loans
13,817
15
—
6,244
4,309
462
—
—
—
24,847
Total impaired loans
$
14,355
$
15
$
—
$
6,244
$
4,309
$
462
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
25,385
June 30, 2014
Single Family Real Estate Secured
(Dollars in thousands)
Mortgage
Home
Equity
Warehouse & other
Multifamily Real Estate Secured
Commercial Real Estate Secured
Auto and RV Secured
Factoring
Commercial & Industrial
Other
Total
Performing loans temporarily modified as TDR
$
989
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
1,390
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
2,379
Non-performing loans
12,396
168
—
4,302
2,985
534
—
—
—
20,385
Total impaired loans
$
13,385
$
168
$
—
$
4,302
$
4,375
$
534
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
22,764
29
Table of Contents
The Company recognizes interest on performing loans temporarily modified as TDR, which is shown in conjunction with average balances as follows:
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2014
Single Family Real Estate Secured
(Dollars in thousands)
Mortgage
Home
Equity
Warehouse & other
Multifamily Real Estate Secured
Commercial Real Estate Secured
Auto and RV Secured
Factoring
Commercial & Industrial
Other
Total
Interest income recognized on performing TDRs
$
6
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
20
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
26
Average balances of performing TDRs
$
763
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
695
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
1,458
Average balances of impaired loans
$
13,870
$
92
$
—
$
5,273
$
4,342
$
498
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
24,075
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013
Single Family Real Estate Secured
(Dollars in thousands)
Mortgage
Home
Equity
Warehouse & other
Multifamily Real Estate Secured
Commercial Real Estate Secured
Auto and RV Secured
Factoring
Commercial & Industrial
Other
Total
Interest income recognized on performing TDRs
$
10
$
1
$
—
$
30
$
20
$
17
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
78
Average balances of performing TDRs
$
1,014
$
35
$
—
$
1,626
$
1,419
$
861
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
4,955
Average balances of impaired loans
$
11,320
$
55
$
—
$
4,898
$
3,544
$
1,281
$
19
$
—
$
18
$
21,135
The Company’s loan modifications primarily included single family, multifamily and commercial loans of which included one or a combination of the following: a reduction of the stated interest rate or delinquent property taxes that were paid by the Bank and either repaid by the borrower over a one year period or capitalized and amortized over the remaining life of the loan. The Company’s loan modifications also included RV loans in which borrowers were able to make interest-only payments for a period of six months to a year which then reverted back to fully amortizing.
Credit Quality Indicators
The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings.
Pass.
Loans classified as pass are well protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or by the fair value, less cost to acquire and sell, of any underlying collateral in a timely manner.
Special Mention
. Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution’s credit position at some future date.
Substandard
. Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.
Doubtful
. Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.
The Company reviews and grades loans following a continuous loan review process, featuring coverage of all loan types and business lines at least quarterly. Continuous reviewing provides more effective risk monitoring because it immediately tests for potential impacts caused by changes in personnel, policy, products or underwriting standards.
30
Table of Contents
The following table presents the composition of our loan portfolio by credit quality indicators:
September 30, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Pass
Special
Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Total
Single Family Real Estate Secured:
Mortgage:
In-house originated
$
2,106,993
$
11,702
$
5,792
$
—
$
2,124,487
Purchased
101,980
735
9,168
—
111,883
Home Equity:
In-house originated
4,245
—
141
—
4,386
Warehouse and other:
In-house originated
357,050
—
—
—
357,050
Multifamily Real Estate Secured:
In-house originated
930,604
14,038
8,321
—
952,963
Purchased
141,317
4,894
4,625
—
150,836
Commercial Real Estate Secured:
In-house originated
5,080
1,022
—
—
6,102
Purchased
10,859
—
4,618
—
15,477
Auto and RV Secured:
In-house originated
13,479
27
516
—
14,022
Factoring:
In-house originated
132,077
—
—
—
132,077
Commercial & Industrial:
In-house originated
152,894
—
—
—
152,894
Other
607
—
—
—
607
Total
$
3,957,185
$
32,418
$
33,181
$
—
$
4,022,784
As a % of total gross loans
98.37
%
0.81
%
0.82
%
—
%
100.00
%
June 30, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Pass
Special
Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Total
Single Family Real Estate Secured:
Mortgage:
In-house originated
$
1,784,694
$
11,083
$
5,822
$
—
$
1,801,599
Purchased
104,457
3,030
9,540
—
117,027
Home Equity:
In-house originated
4,035
30
168
—
4,233
Purchased
8,457
—
—
—
8,457
Warehouse and other:
In-house originated
370,717
—
—
—
370,717
Multifamily Real Estate Secured:
In-house originated
796,119
16,068
6,802
—
818,989
Purchased
150,534
2,896
6,092
—
159,522
Commercial Real Estate Secured:
In-house originated
6,164
—
—
6,164
Purchased
13,211
—
4,686
—
17,897
Auto and RV Secured:
In-house originated
13,943
145
652
—
14,740
Factoring:
In-house originated
118,945
—
—
—
118,945
Commercial & Industrial:
In-house originated
152,619
—
—
—
152,619
Other
1,971
—
—
—
1,971
Total
$
3,525,866
$
33,252
$
33,762
$
—
$
3,592,880
As a % of total gross loans
98.13
%
0.93
%
0.94
%
—
%
100.00
%
The Company considers the performance of the loan portfolio and its impact on the allowance for loan losses. The Company also evaluates credit quality based on the aging status of its loans. The following table provides the outstanding unpaid balance of loans that are past due
30
days or more by portfolio class as of the period indicated:
31
Table of Contents
September 30, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
30-59 Days Past Due
60-89 Days Past Due
90+ Days Past Due
Total
Single family real estate secured:
Mortgage:
In-house originated
$
8,472
$
7,539
$
5,210
$
21,221
Purchased
1,339
446
4,197
5,982
Home equity:
In-house originated
66
—
—
66
Multifamily real estate secured:
In-house originated
—
618
291
909
Purchased
1,307
—
—
1,307
Commercial real estate secured:
Purchased
—
—
382
382
Auto and RV secured
168
36
21
225
Total
$
11,352
$
8,639
$
10,101
$
30,092
As a % of total gross loans
0.28
%
0.21
%
0.25
%
0.74
%
June 30, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
30-59 Days Past Due
60-89 Days Past Due
90+ Days Past Due
Total
Single family real estate secured:
Mortgage
In-house originated
$
4,519
$
489
$
2,660
$
7,668
Purchased
1,468
390
3,661
5,519
Home equity
In-house originated
21
—
—
21
Multifamily real estate secured
In-house originated
291
—
293
584
Purchased
—
—
125
125
Commercial real estate secured
Purchased
—
—
383
383
Auto and RV secured
177
—
64
241
Factoring
48
—
—
48
Commercial and industrial
—
328
—
328
Total
$
6,524
$
1,207
$
7,186
$
14,917
As a % of total gross loans
0.18
%
0.04
%
0.20
%
0.42
%
32
Table of Contents
6.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company has
three
equity incentive plans, the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (“2014 Plan”), the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (“2004 Plan”) and the 1999 Stock Option Plan (collectively, the “Plans”), which provides for the granting of non-qualified and incentive stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights and other awards to employees, directors and consultants.
1999 Stock Option Plan
. In July 1999, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the 1999 Stock Option Plan (“1999 Plan”) and in August 2001, the Company’s shareholders approved an amendment to the 1999 Plan such that
15%
of the outstanding shares of the Company would always be available for grants under the 1999 Plan. The 1999 Plan is designed to encourage selected employees and directors to improve operations and increase profits, and to accept or continue employment or association with the Company through participation in the growth in the value of the common stock. The 1999 Plan requires that option exercise prices be not less than fair market value per share of common stock on the option grant date for incentive and non-qualified options. The options issued under the 1999 Plan generally vest in between
three
and
five
years. Option expiration dates are established by the plan administrator but may not be later than
10
years after the date of the grant.
In November 2007, the shareholders of the Company approved the termination of the 1999 Plan. No new option awards will be made under the 1999 Plan and the outstanding awards under the 1999 Plan will continue to be subject to the terms and conditions of the 1999 Plan.
2004 Stock Incentive Plan
. In October 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors and the stockholders approved the 2004 Plan. In November 2007, the 2004 Plan was amended and approved by the Company’s stockholders. The maximum number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2004 Plan is
14.8%
of the Company’s outstanding common stock measured from time to time. In addition, the number of shares of the Company’s common stock reserved for issuance will also automatically increase by an additional
1.5%
on the first day of each of
four
fiscal years starting July 1, 2007. At
September 30, 2014
, there were a maximum of
2,661,705
shares available for issuance under the limits of the 2004 Plan. With the stockholders approving the 2014 Plan in October 2014, no further awards will be made under the 2004 Plan and the 2004 Plan will remain in effect only so long as awards made thereunder remain outstanding.
2014 Stock Incentive Plan
. In October 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors and the stockholders approved the 2014 Plan. The maximum number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2014 Plan is
920,000
. Prior to stockholder approval of the 2014 Plan, no shares were available for issuance under the limits of the 2014 Plan.
Stock Options
. At
September 30, 2014
and at
June 30, 2014
, all expense related to stock option grants has been fully recognized.
A summary of stock option activity under the Plans during the periods indicated is presented below:
Number of
Shares
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
Outstanding—June 30, 2013
162,482
$
8.81
Granted
—
—
Exercised
(55,532
)
9.00
Cancelled
—
—
Outstanding—June 30, 2014
106,950
$
8.71
Granted
—
—
Exercised
—
—
Cancelled
—
—
Outstanding—September 30, 2014
106,950
$
8.71
Options exercisable—June 30, 2013
162,482
$
8.81
Options exercisable—June 30, 2014
106,950
$
8.71
Options exercisable—September 30, 2014
106,950
$
8.71
33
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes information as concerning currently outstanding and exercisable options:
As of September 30, 2014
Options Outstanding
Options Exercisable
Exercise
Prices
Number
Outstanding
Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual Life (Years)
Number
Exercisable
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
$
7.35
34,550
1.82
34,550
$
7.35
8.50
7,500
1.16
7,500
8.50
9.20
7,500
0.90
7,500
9.20
9.50
57,400
0.82
57,400
9.50
106,950
1.17
106,950
8.71
The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and options exercisable under the Plans at
September 30, 2014
was
$6,844
.
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
. Under the 2004 Plan, employees and directors are eligible to receive grants of restricted stock and restricted stock units. The Company determines stock-based compensation expense using the fair value method. The fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock units is equal to the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.
During the
three months
ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
, the Company granted
129,251
and
104,970
restricted stock units, respectively, to employees and directors. Restricted stock unit awards (“RSUs”) granted during these quarters vest over
three
years, one-third on each anniversary date, except for any RSUs granted to our CEO, which vest one-fourth on each fiscal year end.
The Company’s income before income taxes and net income for the
three months
ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
included stock award expense of
$1,320
and
$966
, with total income tax benefit of
$540
and
$391
respectively. The Company recognizes compensation expense based upon the grant-date fair value divided by the vesting and the service period between each vesting date. At
September 30, 2014
, unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested awards aggregated to
$16,514
and is expected to be recognized in future periods as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Stock Award
Compensation
Expense
For the fiscal year remainder:
2015
$
5,017
2016
5,848
2017
4,128
2018
1,521
Total
$
16,514
The following table presents the status and changes in restricted stock grants for the periods indicated:
Restricted Stock
and Restricted
Stock Unit Shares
Weighted-Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Non-vested balance at July 1, 2013
298,485
$
22.13
Granted
132,944
59.91
Vested
(169,760
)
23.37
Cancelled
(25,230
)
34.41
Non-vested balance at June 30, 2014
236,439
$
41.17
Granted
129,251
76.71
Vested
(45,240
)
26.78
Cancelled
(5,172
)
54.31
Non-vested balance at September 30, 2014
315,278
$
57.59
34
Table of Contents
The total fair value of shares vested for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
was
$3,540
. The total fair value of shares vested for the three months ended
September 30, 2013
was
$4,237
.
2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
. In October 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors and stockholders approved the 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which is intended to qualify as an “Employee Stock Purchase Plan” under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. An aggregate total of
500,000
shares of the Company’s common stock has been reserved for issuance and will be available for purchase under the 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. At
September 30, 2014
, there have been
no
shares issued under the 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
7.
EARNINGS PER SHARE (“EPS”)
Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income or loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if stock options or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted to common stock that would then share in the Company’s earnings.
The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted EPS:
Three Months Ended
September 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
2014
2013
Earnings Per Common Share
Net income
$
17,841
$
12,182
Preferred stock dividends
(77
)
(78
)
Net income attributable to common shareholders
$
17,764
$
12,104
Average common shares issued and outstanding
14,511,365
13,850,909
Average unvested RSU shares
275,409
330,948
Total qualifying shares
14,786,774
14,181,857
Earnings per common share
$
1.20
$
0.85
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share
Net income attributable to common shareholders
$
17,764
$
12,104
Preferred stock dividends to dilutive convertible preferred
—
—
Dilutive net income attributable to common shareholders
$
17,764
$
12,104
Average common shares issued and outstanding
14,786,774
14,181,857
Dilutive effect of stock options
58,853
79,631
Dilutive effect of convertible preferred stock
—
—
Total dilutive common shares issued and outstanding
14,845,627
14,261,488
Diluted earnings per common share
$
1.20
$
0.85
8.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Credit-Related Financial Instruments
. The Company is a party to credit-related financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments are commitments to extend credit. Such commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets.
The Company’s exposure to credit loss is represented by the contractual amount of these commitments. The Company follows the same credit policies in making commitments as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.
At
September 30, 2014
, the Company had commitments to originate
$52,870
in fixed rate loans and
$116,765
in variable rate loans, totaling an aggregate outstanding principal balance of
$169,635
. Our fixed rate loan commitments to originate had rates ranging from
3.00%
to
9.32%
. At
September 30, 2014
, the Company also had commitments to sell
$60,956
in fixed rate loans and
$4,763
in variable rate loans, totaling an aggregate outstanding principal balance of
$65,719
.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer so long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The commitments for equity lines of credit may expire without being drawn upon. Therefore, the total commitment
35
Table of Contents
amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The amount of collateral obtained, if it is deemed necessary by the Company, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer.
9.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In the ordinary course of business, the Company has granted related party loans collateralized by real property to officers, directors and their affiliates that are considered to be insiders by regulation. There were
no
new related party loans granted under the provisions of the employee loan program and
no
refinances of existing loans during the
three months
ended
September 30, 2014
, and
no
refinances of existing loans and
no
new loans during the
three months
ended
September 30, 2013
.
36
Table of Contents
Item 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion provides information about the results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, off balance sheet items, contractual obligations and capital resources of BofI Holding, Inc. and subsidiary. This information is intended to facilitate the understanding and assessment of significant changes and trends related to our financial condition and the results of our operations. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial information in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
June 30, 2014
, and the interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in this report.
Some matters discussed in this report may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and as such, may involve risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of terminology such as “estimate,” “project,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “believe,” “will,” or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy that involve risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, expectations of the environment in which we operate and projections of future performance. Forward-looking statements are inherently unreliable and actual results may vary. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from these forward-looking statements include economic conditions, changes in the interest rate environment, changes in the competitive marketplace, risks associated with credit quality and other risk factors discussed under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Factors That May Affect Our Performance” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
June 30, 2014
, which has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. All written and oral forward-looking statements made in connection with this report, which are attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing information.
General
Our company, BofI Holding, Inc., is the holding company for BofI Federal Bank, a diversified financial services company with approximately
$4.8 billion
in assets that provides consumer and business banking products through its branchless, low-cost distribution channels and affinity partners. The Bank has deposit and loan customers nationwide including consumer and business checking, savings and time deposit accounts and financing for single family and multifamily residential properties, small-to-medium size businesses in target sectors, and selected specialty finance receivables. The Bank generates fee income from consumer and business products including fees from loans originated for sale and transaction fees earned from processing payment activity. BofI Holding, Inc.’s common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market and is a component of the Russell 2000
®
Index and the S&P SmallCap 600
®
Index.
BofI Federal Bank is a federal savings bank wholly-owned by our company and regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”). The parent company, BofI Holding, Inc., is a unitary savings and loan holding company regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
We distribute our deposit products through a wide range of retail distributions channels, and our deposits consist of demand, savings and time deposits accounts. We distribute our loan products through our retail, correspondent and wholesale channels, and the loans we retain are primarily first mortgages secured by single family real property and by multifamily real property. Our mortgage-backed securities consist primarily of mortgage pass-through securities issued by government-sponsored entities and non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations and pass-through mortgage-backed securities issued by private sponsors. We believe our flexibility to adjust our asset generation channels has been a competitive advantage allowing us to avoid markets and products where credit fundamentals are poor.
Critical Accounting Policies
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make a number of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions based upon historical experience and various factors and circumstances. We believe that our estimates and assumptions are reasonable under the circumstances. However, actual results may differ significantly from these estimates and assumptions that could have a material effect on the carrying value of assets and liabilities at the balance sheet dates and our results of operations for the reporting periods.
37
Table of Contents
Our significant accounting policies and practices are described in greater detail in Note 1 to our
June 30, 2014
audited consolidated financial statements and under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies” contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the fiscal year end
June 30, 2014
.
Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In addition to the results presented in accordance with GAAP, this report includes non-GAAP financial measures such as core earnings. We define net income without the after-tax impact of realized and unrealized securities gains and losses as adjusted earnings (“core earnings”), a non-GAAP measurement, which we believe provides useful information about the Bank’s operating performance. Excluding the securities gains and losses provides investors with an understanding of our Bank’s core lending and mortgage banking business. Non-GAAP financial measures have inherent limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied and are not audited. Readers should be aware of these limitations and should be cautious as their use of such measures. Although we believe the non-GAAP financial measures disclosed in this report enhance investors’ understanding of its business and performance, these non-GAAP measures should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for GAAP basis financial measures.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following tables set forth certain selected financial data concerning the periods indicated:
B
OF
I HOLDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(Dollars in thousands)
September 30,
2014
June 30,
2014
September 30,
2013
Selected Balance Sheet Data:
Total assets
$
4,824,863
$
4,402,999
$
3,284,182
Loans—net of allowance for loan losses
3,959,155
3,532,841
2,433,001
Loans held for sale, at fair value
18,021
20,575
19,695
Loans held for sale, lower of cost or fair value
72,719
114,796
51,223
Allowance for loan losses
20,495
18,373
14,546
Securities—trading
8,187
8,066
7,734
Securities—available-for-sale
205,780
214,778
220,081
Securities—held-to-maturity
243,402
247,729
267,670
Total deposits
3,261,756
3,041,536
2,192,964
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
35,000
45,000
110,000
Advances from the FHLB
1,075,000
910,000
656,000
Subordinated debentures and other borrowings
5,155
5,155
5,155
Total stockholders’ equity
412,101
370,778
282,617
38
Table of Contents
B
OF
I HOLDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
At or for the Three Months Ended
September 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
2014
2013
Selected Income Statement Data:
Interest and dividend income
$
54,805
$
36,346
Interest expense
9,930
8,236
Net interest income
44,875
28,110
Provision for loan losses
2,500
500
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
42,375
27,610
Non-interest income
5,249
6,976
Non-interest expense
17,446
14,514
Income before income tax expense
30,178
20,072
Income tax expense
12,337
7,890
Net income
$
17,841
$
12,182
Net income attributable to common stock
$
17,764
$
12,104
Per Share Data:
Net income:
Basic
$
1.20
$
0.85
Diluted
$
1.20
$
0.85
Book value per common share
$
27.57
$
20.11
Tangible book value per common share
$
27.52
$
20.11
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
Basic
14,786,774
14,181,857
Diluted
14,845,627
14,261,488
Common shares outstanding at end of period
14,763,507
13,803,247
Common shares issued at end of period
15,750,279
14,729,240
Performance Ratios and Other Data:
Loan originations for investment
$
813,058
$
470,669
Loan originations for sale
$
191,630
$
186,696
Loan purchases
$
—
$
—
Return on average assets
1.56
%
1.63
%
Return on average common stockholders’ equity
18.61
%
17.73
%
Interest rate spread
1
3.85
%
3.73
%
Net interest margin
2
3.98
%
3.86
%
Efficiency ratio
34.81
%
41.37
%
Capital Ratios:
Equity to assets at end of period
8.54
%
8.61
%
Tier 1 leverage (core) capital to adjusted tangible assets
3
8.72
%
8.50
%
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio
3
14.75
%
14.65
%
Total risk-based capital ratio
3
15.46
%
15.41
%
Tangible capital to tangible assets
3
8.70
%
8.50
%
Asset Quality Ratios:
Net annualized charge-offs to average loans outstanding
0.04
%
0.02
%
Non-performing loans to total loans
0.62
%
0.63
%
Non-performing assets to total assets
0.52
%
0.55
%
Allowance for loan losses to total loans at end of period
0.51
%
0.59
%
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans
82.48
%
92.98
%
_________________________
1.
Interest rate spread represents the difference between the annualized weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the annualized weighted average
rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.
2.
Net interest margin represents annualized net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.
3.
Reflects regulatory capital ratios of BofI Federal Bank.
39
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Comparison of the
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
For the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
, we had net income of
$17.8 million
compared to net income of
$12.2 million
for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2013
. Net income attributable to common stockholders was
$17.8 million
or
$1.20
per diluted share for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
compared to net income attributable to common shareholders of
$12.1 million
or
$0.85
per diluted share for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2013
.
Other key comparisons between our operating results for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
are as follows:
•
Net interest income increased
$16.8 million
due to a
54.6%
increase in average earning assets in the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
. These increases were primarily the result of growth in our loan portfolio and a net decrease in the average funding rate of our liabilities. Our net interest margin increased
12
basis points in the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
compared to
September 30, 2013
. The overall rate on interest earning assets was lower by
13
basis points for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
compared to
September 30, 2013
, primarily due to a decrease in market interest rates for new loans and borrower repayments of higher rate loans. This reduction on the asset side was more than offset by a
25
basis point reduction in average rates paid on interest bearing liabilities for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
compared to
September 30, 2013
. The maturity of higher-rate term deposits, reduction of securities sold under agreements to repurchase and addition of lower rate demand and savings deposits was the primary reason for the decrease in average rates paid for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
compared to
September 30, 2013
.
•
Non-interest income decreased
$1.7 million
for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
compared to the
three
months ended
September 30, 2013
. The decrease in non-interest income for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
compared to
September 30, 2013
was the result of a
$2.2 million
decrease in gain on sale – other from reduced sales of structured settlements, a
$1.1 million
increase in unrealized losses on securities and a
$0.2 million
decrease in realized gain on sale of mortgage-backed securities, partially offset by a
$1.1 million
increase in mortgage banking income, a
$0.5 million
increase in banking service fees and other income and a
$0.2 million
increase in prepayment penalty fee income.
•
Non-interest expense increased
$2.9 million
for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
compared to the
three
months ended
September 30, 2013
. For the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
compared to the
three
months ended
September 30, 2013
salaries and related expenses increased
$1.9 million
primarily due to the overall increase in staff, mainly in our loan and deposit areas to support the overall growth of the Bank. Professional fees decreased
$0.9 million
primarily attributable to a reduction in legal fees. Data processing and internet expense increased
$0.3 million
due to core system updates and increased bank customers. Advertising and promotional expense increased
$0.7 million
as a result of increased mortgage banking activity and deposit marketing. Other general and administrative costs increased by
$0.5 million
attributable to loan production expense.
For the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
core earnings were
$18.5 million
and
$12.0 million
, respectively.
Below is a reconciliation of net income to core earnings:
Three Months Ended
September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)
2014
2013
Net Income
$
17,841
$
12,182
Realized securities losses (gains)
—
(208
)
Unrealized securities losses (gains)
1,090
(51
)
Tax (provision) benefit
(446
)
102
Core earnings
$
18,485
$
12,025
Net Interest Income
Net interest income for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
totaled
$44.9 million
, an increase of
59.6%
, compared to net interest income of
$28.1 million
for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2013
. The growth of net interest income for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
is primarily due to net loan portfolio growth, which increased average earning assets, and due to a net decrease in the average funding rate of our liabilities.
40
Table of Contents
Total interest and dividend income during the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
increased
50.8%
to
$54.8 million
, compared to
$36.3 million
during the
three
months ended
September 30, 2013
. The increase in interest and dividend income for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
was primarily attributable to growth in average earning assets from growth in the loan portfolio. The average balance of loans increased
63.9%
for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
compared to the
three
months ended
September 30, 2013
. The increase in interest income on loans was partially offset by lower rates earned on loans and mortgage-backed securities. The net growth in average earning assets for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
was funded largely by increased deposits and to a lesser extent borrowings.
Total interest expense was
$9.9 million
for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
, an increase of
$1.7 million
or
20.6%
as compared with the same period in
2013
. The average funding rate for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
compared to the same
2013
period decreased by
25
basis points while average interest-bearing liabilities grew
50.7%
. The decrease in the average funding rates for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
compared to the same period in
2013
, was primarily driven by the
$1.2 billion
increase in interest-bearing demand and savings accounts at an average rate of 72 basis points. A decrease in the rates for FHLB advances of
16
basis points as a result of the mix of short and long-term borrowings over the period also contributed to the decrease for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
compared with the same period in
2013
. Net interest margin, defined as annualized net interest income divided by average earning assets, increased by
12
basis points to
3.98%
for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
, compared with
3.86%
for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2013
.
41
Table of Contents
Average Balances, Net Interest Income, Yields Earned and Rates Paid
The following table presents information regarding (i) average balances; (ii) the total amount of interest income from interest-earning assets and the weighted average yields on such assets; (iii) the total amount of interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities and the weighted average rates paid on such liabilities; (iv) net interest income; (v) interest rate spread; and (vi) net interest margin for the
three months
ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
:
For the Three Months Ended
September 30,
2014
2013
(Dollars in thousands)
Average
Balance
2
Interest
Income/
Expense
Average Yields
Earned/Rates
Paid
1
Average
Balance
2
Interest
Income/
Expense
Average Yields
Earned/Rates
Paid
1
Assets:
Loans
3, 4
$
3,844,999
$
48,983
5.10
%
$
2,345,467
$
30,385
5.18
%
Federal funds sold
26
—
—
%
—
—
—
%
Interest-earning deposits in other financial institutions
154,595
88
0.23
%
60,250
42
0.28
%
Mortgage-backed and other investment securities
4
463,082
4,847
4.19
%
483,819
5,609
4.64
%
Stock of the FHLB, at cost
44,087
887
8.05
%
26,356
310
4.70
%
Total interest-earning assets
4,506,789
54,805
4.86
%
2,915,892
36,346
4.99
%
Non-interest-earning assets
60,668
72,105
Total assets
$
4,567,457
$
2,987,997
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:
Interest-bearing demand and savings
$
2,239,402
$
4,042
0.72
%
$
1,049,471
$
1,777
0.68
%
Time deposits
748,445
3,202
1.71
%
962,711
3,828
1.59
%
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
41,196
470
4.56
%
110,000
1,232
4.48
%
Advances from the FHLB
892,098
2,180
0.98
%
477,554
1,363
1.14
%
Other borrowings
5,155
36
2.79
%
5,155
36
2.79
%
Total interest-bearing liabilities
3,926,296
9,930
1.01
%
2,604,891
8,236
1.26
%
Non-interest-bearing demand deposits
216,179
82,860
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities
38,127
22,149
Stockholders’ equity
386,856
278,097
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
4,567,458
$
2,987,997
Net interest income
$
44,875
$
28,110
Interest rate spread
5
3.85
%
3.73
%
Net interest margin
6
3.98
%
3.86
%
__________________________
1.
Annualized.
2.
Average balances are obtained from daily data.
3.
Loans include loans held for sale, loan premiums and unearned fees.
4.
Interest income includes reductions for amortization of loan and investment securities premiums and earnings from accretion of discounts and loan fees. Loan fee income is not significant. Also, includes $32.0 million and $32.6 million of Community Reinvestment Act loans which are taxed at a reduced rate for the
2014
and
2013
three month periods
, respectively.
5.
Interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.
6.
Net interest margin represents annualized net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.
42
Table of Contents
Average Balances, Net Interest Income, Yields Earned and Rates Paid
The following table sets forth the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income. Information is provided with respect to (i) effects on interest income and interest expense attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate); (ii) effects on interest income and interest expense attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume); and (iii) changes in rate/volume (change in rate multiplied by change in volume) for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
:
For the Three Months Ended
September 30, 2014
2014 vs 2013
Increase (Decrease) Due to
(Dollars in thousands)
Volume
Rate
Rate/Volume
Total
Increase
(Decrease)
Increase/(decrease) in interest income:
Loans
$
19,419
$
(469
)
$
(352
)
$
18,598
Federal funds sold
—
—
—
—
Interest-earning deposits in other financial institutions
66
(8
)
(12
)
46
Mortgage-backed and other investment securities
(241
)
(544
)
23
(762
)
Stock of the FHLB, at cost
208
221
148
577
$
19,452
$
(800
)
$
(193
)
$
18,459
Increase/(decrease) in interest expense:
Interest-bearing demand and savings
$
2,023
$
105
$
137
$
2,265
Time deposits
(852
)
289
(63
)
(626
)
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
(771
)
22
(13
)
(762
)
Advances from the FHLB
1,181
(191
)
(173
)
817
Other borrowings
—
—
—
—
$
1,581
$
225
$
(112
)
$
1,694
Provision for Loan Losses
The loan loss provision was
$2.5 million
for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
compared to
$0.5 million
for the same period in
2013
. The increase in the provision for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
is primarily due to additions to the allowance for growth of the loan portfolio. Provisions for loan losses are charged to income to bring the allowance for loan losses to a level deemed appropriate by management based on the factors discussed under “Financial Condition—Asset Quality and Allowance for Loan Losses.”
43
Table of Contents
Non-Interest Income
The following table sets forth information regarding our non-interest income for the periods shown:
For the Three Months Ended
September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)
2014
2013
Inc (Dec)
Realized gain on securities:
Sale of mortgage-backed securities
$
—
$
208
$
(208
)
Total realized gain on securities
—
208
(208
)
Other-than-temporary loss on securities:
Total impairment losses
$
(1,211
)
$
253
$
(1,464
)
Loss recognized in other comprehensive loss
—
(825
)
825
Net impairment loss recognized in earnings
(1,211
)
(572
)
(639
)
Fair value gain on trading securities
121
623
(502
)
Total unrealized loss on securities
(1,090
)
51
(1,141
)
Prepayment penalty fee income
877
654
223
Gain on sale – other
916
3,089
(2,173
)
Mortgage banking income
3,063
1,986
1,077
Banking service fees and other income
1,483
988
495
Total non-interest income
$
5,249
$
6,976
$
(1,727
)
Non-interest income decreased
$1.7 million
to
$5.2 million
for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
. The decrease was primarily the result of a
$2.2 million
decrease in gain on sale – other as we reduced sales of structured settlements, an increase in unrealized loss on securities of
$1.1 million
and a decrease in realized gain on securities of
$0.2 million
. The decrease in non-interest income was partially offset by a
$1.1 million
increase in mortgage banking income. Other contributions to partially offset the decrease in non-interest income were a
$0.2 million
increase in prepayment penalty fee income and a
$0.5 million
increase in banking service fees and other income.
Included in gain on sale – other are sales of structured settlement annuity receivables. We engage in the wholesale and retail purchase of state lottery prize and structured settlement annuity payments. These payments are high credit quality deferred payment receivables having a state lottery commission or investment grade (top two tiers) insurance company payor. The Bank originates contracts for the retail purchase of such payments and classifies these under the heading of Factoring in the loan portfolio. Factoring yields are typically higher than mortgage loan rates. Typically, the gain received upon sale of these payment streams is greater than the gain received from an equivalent amount of mortgage loan sales. Since 2013, pools of structured settlement receivables have been originated for sale depending upon management’s assessment of interest rate risk, liquidity, and offers containing favorable terms and are classified on our balance sheet as loans held for sale.
44
Table of Contents
Non-Interest Expense
The following table sets forth information regarding our non-interest expense for the periods shown:
For the Three Months Ended
September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)
2014
2013
Inc (Dec)
Salaries and related costs
$
9,697
$
7,782
$
1,915
Professional services
802
1,680
(878
)
Occupancy and equipment
721
549
172
Data processing and internet
1,514
1,185
329
Advertising and promotional
1,306
589
717
Depreciation and amortization
717
721
(4
)
Real estate owned and repossessed vehicles
57
69
(12
)
FDIC and regulator fees
778
547
231
Other general and administrative
1,854
1,392
462
Total non-interest expenses
$
17,446
$
14,514
$
2,932
Non-interest expense, which is comprised primarily of compensation, data processing and internet expenses, occupancy, advertising and promotional and other operating expenses, was
$17.4 million
for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
, up from
$14.5 million
for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2013
. The increase in compensation expense for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
is primarily due to the expansion of the Bank’s staffing for lending products, strategic partnerships, business banking and regulatory compliance.
Total salaries and related costs increased
$1.9 million
to
$9.7 million
for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
compared to
$7.8 million
for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2013
due to increased staffing levels to support growth in deposit and lending activities. Our staff increased to 393 from 320, or 22.8% between
September 30, 2014
and
2013
, respectively.
Professional services, which include accounting and legal fees, decreased
$0.9 million
for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
, compared to the
three
month period last year. Professional services for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
decreased due to lower volume of legal fees and increased insurance reimbursement.
Advertising and promotional expense increased
$0.7 million
for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
, compared to the
three
months ended
September 30, 2013
. The increase was primarily due to online, email and direct leads expense related to agency mortgage banking and deposit marketing.
Data processing and internet expense increased
$0.3 million
for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
, compared to the
three
month period in fiscal
2013
, respectively. The increase was primarily due to growth in the number of customer accounts and enhancements to the Bank’s core processing system.
The cost of our Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and OCC standard regulatory charges increased
$0.2 million
for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
, compared to the
three
month period last year. The increase was due to the overall growth of the Bank’s liabilities. As an FDIC-insured institution, the Bank is required to pay deposit insurance premiums to the FDIC.
Other general and administrative costs increased by
$0.5 million
for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
, compared to the
three
month period in fiscal
2013
. The increase was primarily related to costs supporting loan production.
Provision for Income Taxes
Our effective income tax rates (income tax provision divided by net income before income tax) for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
were
40.88%
and
39.31%
, respectively. The changes in the tax rates are the result of changes in state tax allocations.
45
Table of Contents
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Balance Sheet Analysis
Our total assets increased
$421.9 million
, or
9.6%
, to
$4,824.9 million
, as of
September 30, 2014
, up from
$4,403.0 million
at
June 30, 2014
. The increase in total assets was primarily due to an increase of
$426.3 million
in net loans held for investment. Total liabilities increased
$380.5 million
, primarily from growth in demand and savings deposits of
$261.7 million
and FHLB advances of $165.0 million, partially offset by a decline in time deposits of
$60.9 million
and the expiration of
$10.0 million
of reverse repurchase agreements.
Loans
Net loans held for investment increased
12.1%
to
$3,959.2 million
at
September 30, 2014
from
$3,532.8 million
at
June 30, 2014
. The increase in the loan portfolio was primarily due to loan originations and purchases of
$813.1 million
, partially offset by loan repayments and other adjustments of $386.7 million during the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
.
The following table sets forth the composition of the loan portfolio as of the dates indicated:
September 30, 2014
June 30, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Amount
Percent
Amount
Percent
Single family real estate secured:
Mortgage
$
2,236,370
55.58
%
$
1,918,626
53.41
%
Home equity
4,386
0.11
%
12,690
0.35
%
Warehouse and other
357,050
8.88
%
370,717
10.32
%
Multifamily real estate secured
1,103,799
27.44
%
978,511
27.23
%
Commercial real estate secured
21,579
0.54
%
24,061
0.67
%
Auto and RV secured
14,022
0.35
%
14,740
0.41
%
Factoring
132,077
3.28
%
118,945
3.31
%
Commercial & Industrial
152,894
3.80
%
152,619
4.25
%
Other
607
0.02
%
1,971
0.05
%
Total gross loans
4,022,784
100.00
%
3,592,880
100.00
%
Allowance for loan losses
(20,495
)
(18,373
)
Unaccreted discounts and loan fees
(43,134
)
(41,666
)
Net mortgage loans on real estate
$
3,959,155
$
3,532,841
The Bank originates and purchases mortgage loans with terms that may include repayments that are less than the repayments for fully amortizing loans, including interest only loans, option adjustable-rate mortgages, and other loan types that permit payments that may be smaller than interest accruals. The Bank’s lending guidelines for interest only loans are adjusted for the increased credit risk associated with these loans by requiring borrowers with such loans to borrow at LTVs that are lower than standard amortizing ARM loans and by calculating debt to income ratios for qualifying borrowers based upon a fully amortizing payment, not the interest only payment. The Company’s Internal Asset Review Committee monitors and performs reviews of interest only loans. Adverse trends reflected in the Company’s delinquency statistics, grading and classification of interest only loans would be reported to management and the Board of Directors. As of
September 30, 2014
, the Company had
$569.7 million
of interest only mortgage loans and
$5.8 million
of option adjustable-rate mortgage loans. Through
September 30, 2014
, the net amount of deferred interest on these loan types was not material to the financial position or operating results of the Company.
46
Table of Contents
Asset Quality and Allowance for Loan Loss
Non-performing Assets
Non-performing loans are comprised of loans past due
90 days
or more on nonaccrual status and other nonaccrual loans. Non-performing assets include non-performing loans plus other real estate owned and repossessed vehicles. At
September 30, 2014
, our non-performing loans totaled
$24.8 million
, or
0.62%
of total gross loans and our total non-performing assets totaled
$25.1 million
, or
0.52%
of total assets.
Non-performing loans and foreclosed assets or “non-performing assets” consisted of the following as of the dates indicated:
(Dollars in thousands)
September 30, 2014
June 30, 2014
Inc (Dec)
Non-performing assets:
Non-accrual loans:
Single family real estate secured:
Mortgage
$
13,817
$
12,396
$
1,421
Home equity
15
168
(153
)
Warehouse and other
—
—
—
Multifamily real estate secured
6,244
4,302
1,942
Commercial real estate secured
4,309
2,985
1,324
Total non-performing loans secured by real estate
24,385
19,851
4,534
Auto and RV secured
462
534
(72
)
Factoring
—
—
—
Commercial & Industrial
—
—
—
Other
—
—
—
Total non-performing loans
24,847
20,385
4,462
Foreclosed real estate
48
—
48
Repossessed—vehicles
164
75
89
Total non-performing assets
$
25,059
$
20,460
$
4,599
Total non-performing loans as a percentage of total loans
0.62
%
0.57
%
0.05
%
Total non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets
0.52
%
0.46
%
0.06
%
Total non-performing assets increased from
$20.5 million
at
June 30, 2014
to
$25.1 million
at
September 30, 2014
. As a percentage of total assets, non-performing assets increased from
0.46%
at
June 30, 2014
to
0.52%
at
September 30, 2014
. The non-performing assets increase of approximately
$4.6 million
, was primarily the result of one loan in each of the following segments: single family, multifamily, and commercial.
A troubled debt restructuring is a concession made to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties, typically permanent or temporary modifications of principal and interest payments or an extension of maturity dates. When a loan is delinquent and classified as a troubled debt restructuring no interest is accrued until the borrower demonstrates over time (typically six months) that it can make payments. When a loan is considered a troubled debt restructuring and is on nonaccrual, it is considered non-performing and included in the table above. The Bank had performing troubled debt restructurings on mortgage loans and RV loans with outstanding balances totaling
$0.5 million
at
September 30, 2014
and
$2.4 million
at
June 30, 2014
.
Allowance for Loan Losses
We are committed to maintaining the allowance for loan losses at a level that is considered to be commensurate with estimated and known risks in the portfolio. Although the adequacy of the allowance is reviewed quarterly, our management performs an ongoing assessment of the risks inherent in the portfolio. While we believe that the allowance for loan losses is adequate at
September 30, 2014
, future additions to the allowance will be subject to continuing evaluation of estimated and known, as well as inherent, risks in the loan portfolio.
The assessment of the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses is based upon a number of quantitative and qualitative factors, including levels and trends of past due and nonaccrual loans, change in volume and mix of loans, collateral values and charge-off history.
We provide general loan loss reserves for our RV and auto loans based upon the borrower credit score at the time of origination and the Company’s loss experience to date. The allowance for loan loss for the RV and auto loan portfolio at
September 30, 2014
was determined by classifying each outstanding loan according to the semi-annually refreshed FICO score
47
Table of Contents
and providing loss rates. The Company had
$13,560
of RV and auto loan balances subject to general reserves as follows: FICO greater than or equal to 770:
$3,421
; 715 – 769:
$4,502
; 700 – 714:
$1,043
; 660 – 699:
$2,401
and less than 660:
$2,193
.
We experienced increased charge-offs of RV loans in fiscal 2007 through 2011, due to the nationwide recession. Our portfolio of RV loans is expected to decrease in the future because the Bank ceased originating RV loans in fiscal 2009.
The Company provides general loan loss reserves for mortgage loans based upon the size and class of the mortgage loan and the loan-to-value ratio (“LTV”) at date of origination. The allowance for each class is determined by dividing the outstanding unpaid balance for each loan by the loan-to-value and applying quantitative and qualitative loss rates. The LTV groupings for each significant mortgage class are as follows (dollars in thousands):
The Company had
$2,222,015
of single family mortgage portfolio loan balances subject to general reserves as follows: LTV less than or equal to 60%:
$1,290,619
; 61% – 70%:
$775,927
; 71% – 80%:
$132,293
; greater than 80%:
$23,176
.
The Company had
$1,097,555
of multifamily mortgage portfolio loan balances subject to general reserves as follows: LTV less than or equal to 55%:
$496,006
; 56% – 65%:
$359,799
; 66% – 75%:
$227,964
; 76% – 80%:
$11,077
and greater than 80%:
$2,709
.
The Company had
$17,271
of commercial real estate loan balances subject to general reserves as follows: LTV less than or equal to 50%:
$9,230
; 51% – 60%:
$5,715
; 61% – 70%:
$1,425
; and 71% – 80%:
$901
.
The weighted average LTV percentage for our entire real estate loan portfolio was 55% at
September 30, 2014
. We believe that this percentage is lower and more conservative than most banks, which results in lower average mortgage loan charge-offs when compared to many other comparable banks.
While we anticipate that such level of charge-offs will continue into the future, given the uncertainties surrounding the improvement of the U.S. economy, we may experience an increase in the relative amount of charge-offs and we may be required to increase our loan loss provisions in the future to provide a larger loss allowance for one or more of our loan types.
The following table summarizes impaired loans as of:
(Dollars in thousands)
September 30, 2014
June 30, 2014
Non-performing loans—90+ days past due plus other non-accrual loans
$
24,847
$
16,390
Troubled debt restructuring loans—non-accrual
—
3,995
Troubled debt restructuring loans—performing
538
2,379
Total impaired loans
$
25,385
$
22,764
The following table reflects management’s allocation of the allowance for loan losses by loan category and the ratio of each loan category to total loans as of the dates indicated:
September 30, 2014
June 30, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Amount
of
Allowance
Allocation
as a % of
Allowance
Amount
of
Allowance
Allocation
as a % of
Allowance
Single family real estate secured:
Mortgage
9,807
47.86
%
7,959
43.32
%
Home equity
113
0.55
%
134
0.73
%
Warehouse and other
1,216
5.93
%
1,259
6.85
%
Multifamily real estate secured
4,022
19.62
%
3,785
20.60
%
Commercial real estate secured
965
4.71
%
1,035
5.63
%
Auto and RV secured
1,160
5.66
%
812
4.42
%
Factoring
311
1.52
%
279
1.52
%
Commercial & Industrial
2,882
14.06
%
3,048
16.59
%
Other
19
0.09
%
62
0.34
%
Total
$
20,495
100.00
%
$
18,373
100.00
%
The loan loss provision was
$2.5 million
and
$0.5 million
for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
and
September 30, 2013
, respectively. The increase for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
in the loan loss provision was primarily the result of growth in the loan portfolio. We believe that the lower average LTV in the Bank’s mortgage loan portfolio will continue to
48
Table of Contents
result in future lower average mortgage loan charge-offs when compared to many other comparable banks. Our general loan loss reserves are based upon historical losses and expected future trends. The resolution of the Bank’s existing REO and non-performing loans should not have a significant adverse impact on our operating results.
Investment Securities
Total investment securities were
$457.4 million
as of
September 30, 2014
, compared with
$470.6 million
at
June 30, 2014
. During the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
, we did not purchase any debt securities and received principal repayments of approximately $10.8 million in our available-for-sale portfolio. In our held-to-maturity portfolio, we received principal repayments of $6.8 million with the balance of the change attributable to accretion and other activities. We currently classify agency mortgage-backed and debt securities as held-to-maturity or available-for-sale at the time of purchase based upon small issue size and based on issue features, such as callable terms.
Deposits
Deposits increased a net
$220.2 million
, or
7.2%
, to
$3,261.8 million
at
September 30, 2014
, from
$3,041.5 million
at
June 30, 2014
. Our deposit growth was the result of a
17.2%
increase in interest-bearing demand accounts and a
7.2%
increase in savings accounts. Increases in business banking customers resulted in higher demand and savings account business, which replaced maturing time deposits during the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
.
The following table sets forth the composition of the deposit portfolio as of the dates indicated:
September 30, 2014
June 30, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Amount
Rate
1
Amount
Rate
1
Non-interest bearing
$
206,248
—
%
$
186,786
—
%
Interest-bearing:
Demand
1,324,034
0.68
%
1,129,535
0.63
%
Savings
1,003,149
0.73
%
935,973
0.73
%
Total interest-bearing demand and savings
2,327,183
0.70
%
2,065,508
0.67
%
Time deposits:
Under $100,000
93,599
1.21
%
107,294
1.23
%
$100,000 or more
634,726
1.79
%
681,948
1.67
%
Total time deposits
2
728,325
1.71
%
789,242
1.61
%
Total interest bearing
3,055,508
0.94
%
2,854,750
0.93
%
Total deposits
$
3,261,756
0.89
%
$
3,041,536
0.88
%
______________________________
1.
Based on weighted-average stated interest rates at end of period.
2.
The total includes brokered deposits of
$422.3 million
and
$404.8 million
as of
September 30, 2014
and
June 30, 2014
, respectively, of which
$280.9 million
and
$275.4 million
, respectively, are time deposits.
The following table sets forth the number of deposit accounts by type as of the date indicated:
September 30, 2014
June 30, 2014
September 30, 2013
Checking and savings accounts
30,685
30,402
30,938
Time deposits
6,769
7,571
10,005
Total number of deposit accounts
37,454
37,973
40,943
49
Table of Contents
Borrowings
The following table sets forth the composition of our borrowings as of the dates indicated:
September 30, 2014
June 30, 2014
September 30, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)
Balance
Weighted Average Rate
Balance
Weighted Average Rate
Balance
Weighted Average Rate
Repurchase agreements
$
35,000
4.38
%
$
45,000
4.46
%
$
110,000
4.40
%
FHLB Advances
1,075,000
0.77
%
910,000
0.97
%
656,000
0.85
%
Subordinated debentures and other borrowings
5,155
2.63
%
5,155
2.63
%
5,155
2.66
%
Total borrowings
$
1,115,155
0.90
%
$
960,155
1.14
%
$
771,155
1.37
%
Weighted average cost of borrowings during the quarter
1.15
%
1.50
%
1.77
%
Borrowings as a percent of total assets
23.1
%
21.8
%
23.5
%
At
September 30, 2014
, total borrowings amounted to
$1,115.2 million
, up $155.0 million or
16.1%
from
June 30, 2014
and up
$344.0 million
or
44.6%
from
September 30, 2013
. Total borrowings represented
23.1%
of total assets and had a weighted average cost of
1.15%
at
September 30, 2014
, compared with
21.8%
of total assets at a weighted average cost of
1.50%
at
June 30, 2014
and
23.5%
of total assets at a weighted average cost of
1.77%
at
September 30, 2013
.
We have sold securities under various agreements to repurchase for total proceeds of
$35.0 million
. The repurchase agreements have interest rates between 3.75% and 4.75% and scheduled maturities between April 2017 and December 2017. Under these agreements, we may be required to repay the
$35.0 million
and repurchase our securities before the scheduled maturity if the issuer requests repayment on scheduled quarterly call dates. The weighted-average remaining contractual maturity period is
2.90 years
and the weighted average remaining period before such repurchase agreements could be called is
0.12 years
.
We regularly use advances from the FHLB to manage our interest rate risk and, to a lesser extent, manage our liquidity position. Generally, FHLB advances with terms between
three
and
ten years
have been used to fund the purchase of single family and multifamily mortgages and to provide us with interest rate risk protection should rates rise. At
September 30, 2014
, a total of $15.0 million of FHLB advances include agreements that allow the FHLB, at its option, to put the advances back to us after specified dates. The weighted-average remaining contractual maturity period of the $15.0 million in putable advances is
1.25 years
and the weighted average remaining period before such advances could be put to us is
0.15 years
.
Stockholders’ Equity
Stockholders’ equity increased
$41.3 million
to
$412.1 million
at
September 30, 2014
compared to
$370.8 million
at
June 30, 2014
. The increase was the result of our net income for the
three months
ended
September 30, 2014
of
$17.8 million
, sale of common stock of
$20.6 million
, vesting and issuance of RSUs and exercise of stock options of
$0.7 million
, a
$2.3 million
unrealized gain in other comprehensive income, net of tax, less a reduction of
$0.1 million
for dividends declared on preferred stock.
50
Table of Contents
LIQUIDITY
Cash flow information is as follows:
For the Three Months Ended
September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)
2014
2013
Operating Activities
$
58,916
$
59,988
Investing Activities
$
(412,499
)
$
(233,211
)
Financing Activities
$
396,259
$
168,512
During the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
, we had net cash inflows from operating activities of
$58.9 million
compared to inflows of
$60.0 million
for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2013
. Net operating cash inflows and outflows fluctuate due to the timing of originations of loans held for sale and proceeds from loan sales.
Net cash outflows from investing activities totaled
$412.5 million
for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
, while outflows totaled
$233.2 million
for the same period in fiscal year
2014
. The increase was primarily due to higher loan originations, which were only partially offset by increased repayments of loans in the fiscal
2015
period compared to the same period in the prior year.
Our net cash provided by financing activities totaled
$396.3 million
for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
, while inflows totaled
$168.5 million
for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2013
. Net cash provided by financing activities increased primarily from a net increase in deposits and advances exceeding repayments from the FHLB for the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
compared to
September 30, 2013
.
During the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
, the Bank could borrow up to 40.0% of its total assets from the FHLB. Borrowings are collateralized by the pledge of certain mortgage loans and investment securities to the FHLB. At
September 30, 2014
, the Company had
$826.3 million
available immediately and reflects a fully collateralized position. At
September 30, 2014
, we also had two unsecured federal funds purchase lines with two different banks totaling $35.0 million, under which no borrowings were outstanding.
The Bank has the ability to borrow short-term from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Discount Window. At
September 30, 2014
, the Bank did not have any borrowings outstanding and the amount available from this source was
$12.8 million
. The credit line is collateralized by consumer loans and mortgage-backed securities.
In an effort to expand the Bank’s liquidity options, we have issued brokered deposits, with
$422.3 million
outstanding at
September 30, 2014
. We believe our liquidity sources to be stable and adequate for our anticipated needs and contingencies. We believe we have the ability to increase our level of deposits and borrowings to address our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future.
AT-THE-MARKET OFFERING
On July 22, 2014, we entered into an At-the-Market (“ATM”) Equity Distribution Agreement with Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc., Raymond James & Associates, Inc. and Sterne, Agee & Leach, Inc. (the “Distribution Agents”) pursuant to which we may issue and sell through the Distribution Agents from time to time shares of our common stock in at the market offerings with an aggregate offering price of up to $50.0 million (the “ATM Offering”). The sales of shares of our common stock under the Equity Distribution Agreement are to be made in “at the market” offerings as defined in Rule 415 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, including sales made directly on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (the principal existing trading market for our common stock), or sales made through a market maker or any other trading market for our common stock, or (with our prior consent) in privately negotiated transactions at negotiated prices. The aggregate compensation payable to the Distribution Agents under the Distribution Agreement will not exceed 2.5% of the gross sales price of the shares sold under the agreement. We have also agreed to reimburse the Distribution Agents for up to $75,000 in their expenses and have provided the Distribution Agents with customary indemnification rights.
51
Table of Contents
In fiscal year 2015, we commenced sales of common stock through the ATM Offering. The details of the shares of common stock sold through the ATM Offering through
September 30, 2014
are as follows (dollars in thousands, except per share data, per share price is net of commissions):
Distribution Agent
Month
Weighted Average Per Share Price
Number of
Shares Sold
Net Proceeds
Compensation to Distribution Agent
Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.
August 2014
$
78.72
44,417
$
3,409
$
87
Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.
September 2014
$
74.58
236,800
$
17,218
$
441
As of
September 30, 2014
, the total gross sales we completed and the remaining sales we have available under the ATM Offering were $21.2 million and $28.8 million respectively.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET COMMITMENTS
At
September 30, 2014
, we had commitments to originate loans with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of
$169.6 million
, and commitments to sell loans with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of
$65.7 million
. We have no commitments to purchase loans, investment securities or any other unused lines of credit.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The Company enters into contractual obligations in the normal course of business primarily as a source of funds for its asset growth and to meet required capital needs. Our time deposits due within one year of
September 30, 2014
totaled
$307.9 million
. We believe the large percentage of time deposits that mature within one year reflects customers’ hesitancy to invest their funds long term. If these maturing deposits do not remain with us, we may be required to seek other sources of funds, including other time deposits and borrowings. Depending on market conditions, we may be required to pay higher rates on deposits and borrowings than we currently pay on time deposits maturing within one year. However, based on past experience we believe a significant portion of our time deposits will remain with us. We believe we have the ability to attract and retain deposits by adjusting interest rates offered.
The following table presents certain of our contractual obligations as of the period indicated:
As of September 30, 2014
Payments Due by Period
1
(Dollars in thousands)
Total
Less Than One Year
One To Three Years
Three To Five Years
More Than Five Years
Long-term debt obligations
2
$
1,151,230
$
738,975
$
165,287
$
182,229
$
64,739
Time deposits
2
728,952
308,132
193,704
33,509
193,607
Operating lease obligations
3
14,931
2,339
4,982
5,438
2,172
Total
$
1,895,113
$
1,049,446
$
363,973
$
221,176
$
260,518
________________________________
1.
Our contractual obligations include long-term debt, time deposits and operating leases as shown. We had no capitalized leases or material commitments for capital expenditures at
September 30, 2014
.
2.
Amounts include principal and interest due to recipient.
3.
Payments are for leases of real property.
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND REQUIREMENTS
BofI Federal Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements set by the federal banking agencies. Failure by our Bank to meet minimum capital requirements could result in certain mandatory and discretionary actions by regulators that could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, our Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of our Bank’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Our Bank’s capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation require our Bank to maintain certain minimum capital amounts and ratios. Regulations of the OCC require our Bank to maintain minimum ratios of tangible capital to tangible assets of 1.5%, core capital to tangible assets of 4.0% and total risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets of 8.0%. At
September 30, 2014
, our Bank met all the capital adequacy requirements to which it was subject. At
September 30, 2014
, our Bank was “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be “well capitalized,” our Bank must maintain minimum leverage, tier 1 risk-based and total risk-based capital ratios of at least 5.0%, 6.0% and 10.0%, respectively. Management believes that no conditions
52
Table of Contents
or events have occurred since
September 30, 2014
that management believes would materially adversely change the Bank’s capital classification. From time to time, we may need to raise additional capital to support our Bank’s further growth and to maintain its “well capitalized” status.
The Bank’s capital amounts, capital ratios and capital requirements were as follows:
As of September 30, 2014
Actual
For Capital Adequacy
Purposes
To be “Well Capitalized”
Under Prompt Corrective
Action Regulations
(Dollars in thousands)
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Tier 1 leverage (core) capital to adjusted tangible assets
$
421,280
8.72
%
$
193,361
4.00
%
$
241,701
5.00
%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
421,280
14.75
%
N/A
N/A
171,403
6.00
%
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
441,775
15.46
%
228,537
8.00
%
285,672
10.00
%
Tangible capital (to tangible assets)
420,531
8.70
%
72,510
1.50
%
N/A
N/A
As of June 30, 2014
Actual
For Capital Adequacy
Purposes
To be “Well Capitalized”
Under Prompt Corrective
Action Regulations
(Dollars in thousands)
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Tier 1 leverage (core) capital to adjusted tangible assets
$
382,441
8.66
%
$
176,639
4.00
%
$
220,799
5.00
%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
382,441
14.42
%
N/A
N/A
159,181
6.00
%
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
400,814
15.11
%
212,241
8.00
%
265,302
10.00
%
Tangible capital (to tangible assets)
382,441
8.66
%
66,240
1.50
%
N/A
N/A
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We measure interest rate sensitivity as the difference between amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities that mature or contractually re-price within a given period of time. The difference, or the interest rate sensitivity gap, provides an indication of the extent to which an institution’s interest rate spread will be affected by changes in interest rates. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest rate sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities and negative when the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities exceeds the amount of interest rate sensitive assets. In a rising interest rate environment, an institution with a positive gap would be in a better position than an institution with a negative gap to invest in higher yielding assets or to have its asset yields adjusted upward, which would cause the yield on its assets to increase at a faster pace than the cost of its interest-bearing liabilities. During a period of falling interest rates, however, an institution with a positive gap would tend to have its assets reprice at a faster rate than one with a negative gap, which would tend to reduce the growth in its net interest income.
53
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the amounts of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities that were outstanding at
September 30, 2014
and the portions of each financial instrument that are expected to mature or reset interest rates in each future period
:
Term to Repricing, Repayment, or Maturity at
September 30, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Six Months or Less
Over Six
Months Through
One Year
Over One
Year Through
Five Years
Over Five
Years
Total
Interest-earning assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
198,260
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
198,260
Securities
1
302,101
118,879
2,910
33,479
457,369
Stock of the FHLB, at cost
50,525
—
—
—
50,525
Loans—net of allowance for loan loss
549,064
418,257
2,799,567
192,267
3,959,155
Loans held for sale
90,740
—
—
—
90,740
Total interest-earning assets
1,190,690
537,136
2,802,477
225,746
4,756,049
Non-interest earning assets
—
—
—
—
68,814
Total assets
$
1,190,690
$
537,136
$
2,802,477
$
225,746
$
4,824,863
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits
$
510,428
$
2,124,675
$
227,019
$
193,386
$
3,055,508
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
—
—
35,000
—
35,000
Advances from the FHLB
2
710,000
20,000
290,000
55,000
1,075,000
Other borrowed funds
5,155
—
—
—
5,155
Total interest-bearing liabilities
1,225,583
2,144,675
552,019
248,386
4,170,663
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities
—
—
—
—
242,099
Stockholders’ equity
—
—
—
—
412,101
Total liabilities and equity
$
1,225,583
$
2,144,675
$
552,019
$
248,386
$
4,824,863
Net interest rate sensitivity gap
$
(34,893
)
$
(1,607,539
)
$
2,250,458
$
(22,640
)
$
585,386
Cumulative gap
$
(34,893
)
$
(1,642,432
)
$
608,026
$
585,386
$
585,386
Net interest rate sensitivity gap—as a % of interest earning assets
(2.93
)%
(299.28
)%
80.30
%
(10.03
)%
12.31
%
Cumulative gap—as % of cumulative interest earning assets
(2.93
)%
(95.06
)%
13.42
%
16.42
%
12.31
%
________________________
1.
Comprised of agency and non-agency mortgage-backed securities, municipal securities and other non-agency debt securities, which are classified as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale and trading.
2.
See related discussion about H&R Block Bank transaction at the conclusion of Item 2.
The above table provides an approximation of the projected re-pricing of assets and liabilities at September 30, 2014 on the basis of contractual maturities, adjusted for anticipated prepayments of principal and scheduled rate adjustments. The loan and securities prepayment rates reflected herein are based on historical experience. For the non-maturity deposit liabilities, we use decay rates and rate adjustments based upon our historical experience. Actual repayments of these instruments could vary substantially if future experience differs from our historic experience.
Although “gap” analysis is a useful measurement device available to management in determining the existence of interest rate exposure, its static focus as of a particular date makes it necessary to utilize other techniques in measuring exposure to changes in interest rates. For example, gap analysis is limited in its ability to predict trends in future earnings and makes no assumptions about changes in prepayment tendencies or deposit or loan maturity preferences.
54
Table of Contents
The following table indicates the sensitivity of net interest income movements to parallel instantaneous shocks in interest rates for the
1
-
12
months and
13
-
24
months’ time periods. For purposes of modeling net interest income sensitivity the Bank assumes no growth in the balance sheet other than for retained earnings:
As of September 30, 2014
First 12 Months
Next 12 Months
(Dollars in thousands)
Net Interest Income
Percentage Change from Base
Net Interest Income
Percentage Change from Base
Up 200 basis points
$
175,198
(4.91
)%
$
159,088
(13.70
)%
Base
183,763
—
%
180,903
—
%
Down 200 basis points
194,471
5.82
%
178,575
1.27
%
We attempt to measure the effect market interest rate changes will have on the net present value of assets and liabilities, which is defined as market value of equity. The market value of equity for these purposes is not intended to refer to the trading pricing of our common stock. We analyze the market value of equity sensitivity to an immediate parallel and sustained shift in interest rates derived from the current treasury and LIBOR yield curves. For rising interest rate scenarios, the industry market interest rate forecast was increased by 100, 200 and 300 basis points.
The following table indicates the sensitivity of market value of equity to the interest rate movement described above:
As of September 30, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Net
Present Value
Percentage Change from Base
Net
Present
Value as a
Percentage
of Assets
Up 300 basis points
$
315,568
(40.7
)%
6.91
%
Up 200 basis points
373,032
(29.9
)%
7.94
%
Up 100 basis points
444,205
(16.5
)%
9.18
%
Base
532,233
—
%
10.69
%
Down 100 basis points
542,245
1.9
%
10.70
%
Down 200 basis points
566,575
6.5
%
11.06
%
The computation of the prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes is based on numerous assumptions, including relative levels of interest rates, asset prepayments, runoffs in deposits and changes in repricing levels of deposits to general market rates, and should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results. Furthermore, these computations do not take into account any actions that we may undertake in response to future changes in interest rates.
On April 10, 2014, our subsidiary, BofI Federal Bank, and H&R Block Bank entered into a definitive Purchase and Assumption Agreement, pursuant to which BofI Federal Bank agreed to assume all the remaining deposit liabilities of H&R Block Bank subject to regulatory approval. On October 5, 2014, the Company announced that regulatory approval of this transaction is ongoing, but it was not expected that regulatory approval would be received during calendar 2014. Through September 30, 2014, short-term advances from the FHLB were increased to accommodate the $450 to $550 million increase in core deposits expected at the H&R Block Bank transaction closing with cash received from the assumed deposits to be used to pay down the short-term advances. As a result of these actions, our point-in-time measurements of hypothetical interest rate sensitivity at September 30, 2014 showed more up-rate sensitivity than in prior periods. We believe that this increase in interest rate sensitivity will be temporary as we have taken actions in the quarter ended December 31, 2014 to increase other non-H&R Block Bank related deposits and to extend the terms of certain borrowings given the longer regulatory approval timetable.
ITEM 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS
For quantitative and qualitative disclosures regarding market risks in our portfolio, see, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”
ITEM 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company’s management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer along with our Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended
September 30, 2014
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
55
Table of Contents
Management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that the Company’s internal controls will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of internal controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. Also, any evaluation of the effectiveness of controls in future periods are subject to the risk that those internal controls may become inadequate because of changes in business conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
56
Table of Contents
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are not involved in any material legal proceedings. From time to time we may be a party to a claim or litigation that arises in the ordinary course of business, such as claims to enforce liens, claims involving the origination and servicing of loans, and other issues related to the business of the Bank.
ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS
We face a variety of risks that are inherent in our business and our industry. These risks are described in more detail under “MD&A – Factors That May Affect Our Performance,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
June 30, 2014
. We encourage you to read these factors in their entirety. Moreover, other factors may also exist that we cannot anticipate or that we currently do not consider to be significant based on information that is currently available.
ITEM 2.
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The table below sets forth our market repurchases of BofI common stock and the BofI common shares retained in connection with net settlement of restricted stock awards during the
three
months ended
September 30, 2014
. Purchases made relate to the stock repurchase plan of 414,991 shares that was originally approved by the Company’s Board of Directors on July 5, 2005, plus an additional 500,000 shares approved on November 20, 2008. Stock repurchased under this plan will be held as treasury shares.
Period
Number
of Shares
Purchased
Average Price
Paid Per Shares
Total Number of
Shares
Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs
Maximum
Number of
Shares that May
Yet be Purchased
Under the Plans
or Programs
Stock Repurchases
Quarter Ended September 30, 2014
July 1, 2014 to September 30, 2014
—
$
—
—
319,291
Balance at September 30, 2014
595,700
$
5.72
595,700
319,291
Stock Retained in Net Settlement
Beginning Balance at July 1, 2014
376,222
July 1, 2014 to July 31, 2014
202
August 1, 2014 to August 31, 2014
13,600
September 1, 2014 to September 30, 2014
1,048
Ending Balance at September 30, 2014
391,072
Total Treasury Shares at September 30, 2014
986,772
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
None.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
57
Table of Contents
ITEM 6.
EXHIBITS
Exhibit
Document
10.1
Equity Distribution Agreement, dated July 22, 2014, between the Company and the Distribution Agents named therein, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 22, 2014
10.2
Termination of Equity Distribution Agreement dated March 11, 2013, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 22, 2014
10.3
Letter Agreement among H&R Block Bank, Block Financial LLC, and BofI Federal Bank, effective October 23, 2014, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 (Letter Agreement among H&R Block Bank, Block Financial LLC, and BofI Federal Bank, effective October 23, 2014) to Form 8-K filed by H&R Block, Inc. on October 23, 2014
31.1
Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2
Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1
Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2
Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Definition Document
58
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
BofI Holding, Inc.
Dated:
November 4, 2014
By:
/s/ Gregory Garrabrants
Gregory Garrabrants
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Dated:
November 4, 2014
By:
/s/ Andrew J. Micheletti
Andrew J. Micheletti
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
59