UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
Commission File Number 0-26584
BANNER CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
10 South First Avenue, Walla Walla, Washington 99362
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (509) 527-3636
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No ___
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one)
Large accelerated filer
Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
No
X
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
* Includes 301,786 shares held by the Employee Stock Ownership Plan that have not been released, committed to be released, or allocated to participant accounts.
BANNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
8
Selected Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
10
Item 2 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
16
Executive Overview
Asset Quality
24
Liquidity and Capital Resources
26
Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk
Capital Requirements
27
Item 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market Risk and Asset/Liability Management
28
Sensitivity Analysis
Item 4 - Controls and Procedures
32
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 - Legal Proceedings
33
Item 1A - Risk Factors
Item 2 - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Item 3 - Defaults upon Senior Securities
Item 4 - Submission of Matters to a Vote of Stockholders
Item 5 - Other Information
Item 6 - Exhibits
34
SIGNATURES
35
2
BANNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION (Unaudited) (In thousands, except shares)June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005
June 30
December 31
ASSETS
2006
2005
Cash and due from banks
$
105,915
116,448
Securities available for sale, cost $248,629 and $264,087, respectively
Encumbered
17,533
19,579
Unencumbered
222,956
240,705
240,489
260,284
Securities held to maturity, fair value $50,333 and $52,398, respectively
49,657
50,949
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
35,844
Loans receivable:
Held for sale, fair value $5,767 and $4,802
5,708
4,779
Held for portfolio
2,818,325
2,434,952
Allowance for loan losses
(33,618
)
(30,898
2,790,415
2,408,833
Accrued interest receivable
19,143
17,395
Real estate owned, held for sale, net
401
315
Property and equipment, net
52,177
50,205
Goodwill and other intangibles, net
36,298
36,280
Deferred income tax asset, net
9,780
7,606
Bank-owned life insurance
37,709
36,930
Other assets
19,172
19,466
3,397,000
3,040,555
LIABILITIES
Deposits:
Non-interest-bearing
317,515
328,840
Interest-bearing transactions and savings accounts
873,019
792,370
Interest-bearing certificates
1,388,923
1,202,103
2,579,457
2,323,313
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
368,930
265,030
Other borrowings
77,122
96,849
Junior subordinated debentures (issued in connection with Trust Preferred Securities)
97,942
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
31,849
29,503
Deferred compensation
6,882
6,253
Income taxes payable
2,316
--
3,164,498
2,818,890
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Retained earnings
108,626
96,783
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
(2,494
(2,480
Carrying value of shares held in trust for stock related compensation plans
(7,376
(8,464
Liability for common stock issued to deferred, stock related, compensation plans
6,994
7,989
(382
(475
232,502
221,665
See notes to consolidated financial statements
3
BANNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME(Unaudited) (In thousands except for per share amounts)For the Quarters and Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
Quarters Ended
Six Months Ended
INTEREST INCOME:
Loans receivable
55,088
39,842
104,214
75,979
Mortgage-backed securities
2,011
3,586
4,094
7,259
Securities and cash equivalents
1,834
2,943
3,612
5,792
58,933
46,371
111,920
89,030
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits
20,828
12,146
38,259
22,560
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
4,141
5,927
7,267
11,544
766
392
1,464
724
Junior subordinated debentures
1,973
1,193
3,801
2,260
27,708
19,658
50,791
37,088
Net interest income before provision for loan losses
31,225
26,713
61,129
51,942
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
2,300
1,300
3,500
2,503
Net interest income
28,925
25,413
57,629
49,439
OTHER OPERATING INCOME:
Deposit fees and other service charges
2,891
2,401
5,383
4,405
Mortgage banking operations
1,454
1,645
2,606
2,876
Loan servicing fees
334
232
671
Miscellaneous
321
339
789
662
Gain on sale of securities
Total other operating income
5,000
4,625
9,502
8,622
OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES:
Salary and employee benefits
16,553
15,263
32,042
29,056
Less capitalized loan origination costs
(3,228
(2,753
(5,820
(4,794
Occupancy and equipment
3,938
3,394
7,732
6,621
Information/computer data services
1,285
2,585
2,310
Professional services
534
818
1,066
1,619
Advertising
2,074
1,512
3,516
2,863
Insurance recovery, net proceeds
(5,350
4,205
3,373
7,438
6,428
Total other operating expenses
20,011
22,800
43,209
44,103
Income before provision for income taxes
13,914
7,238
23,922
13,958
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
4,555
2,222
7,775
4,235
NET INCOME
9,359
5,016
16,147
9,723
Earnings per common share (see Note 5):
Basic
0.79
0.43
1.36
0.85
Diluted
0.77
0.42
1.33
0.82
Cumulative dividends declared per common share:
0.18
0.17
0.36
0.34
4
BANNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)(Unaudited) (In thousands)For the Quarters and Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF INCOME TAXES:
Unrealized holding gain (loss) during the period, net of deferred income tax (benefit) of $(625), $1,968, $(1,518) and $(582), respectively
(1,148
3,666
(2,796
(1,059
Less adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income, net of income tax (benefit) of $0, $3, $0 and $3, respectively
(5
Other comprehensive income (loss)
3,661
(1,064
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
8,211
8,677
13,351
8,659
5
BANNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY(Unaudited) (In thousands, except per share amounts)For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
Common Stock and Additional Paid-in Capital
Retained Earnings
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Unearned Restricted ESOP Shares
Carrying Value, Net of Liability, Of Shares Held in Trust for Stock-Related Compensation Plans
Stockholders' Equity
BALANCE, January 1, 2005
127,460
92,327
(888
(3,096
(583
$215,220
Net income
Change in valuation of securities available for sale, net of income taxes
Cash dividend on common stock ($.34/share cumulative)
(3,926
Purchase and retirement of common stock
(2,103
Proceeds from issuance of common stock for exercise of stock options
2,757
96
(76
20
Amortization of compensation related to MRP
91
BALANCE, June 30, 2005
128,210
98,124
(1,952
(568
220,718
BALANCE, January 1, 2006
130,573
(2,736
Cash dividend on common stock ($.36/share cumulative)
(4,304
(2,346
3,720
Net issuance of stock through employees' stock plans, including tax benefit
(14
14
Amortization of compensation related to stock options
309
93
BALANCE, June 30, 2006
132,284
(5,532
BANNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (continued)(Unaudited) (In thousands)For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
COMMON STOCK, SHARES ISSUED:
Number of shares, beginning of period
13,201
Number of shares, end of period
LESS COMMON STOCK RETIRED:
(1,119
(1,344
(63
Issuance of common stock to exercised stock options and/or employee stock plans
251
210
Number of shares retired, end of period
(931
(1,210
SHARES ISSUED AND OUTSTANDING, END OF PERIOD
12,270
11,991
UNEARNED, RESTRICTED ESOP SHARES:
(300
(375
Adjustment of earned shares
(2
(302
7
BANNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS(Unaudited) (In thousands)For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Depreciation
2,925
2,375
Deferred income and expense, net of amortization
1,266
2,061
Loss (gain) on sale of securities
(8
Increase in cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance
(779
(783
Gain on sale of loans, excluding capitalized servicing rights
(2,046
(2,733
(47
127
Provision for losses on loans and real estate held for sale
2,509
FHLB stock (dividend) reversal
29
Net change in:
Loans held for sale
(929
(3,692
(1,927
(4,317
Other liabilities
5,733
7,879
Net cash provided by operating activities
23,843
13,170
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
(27,396
15,269
39,279
Proceeds from sales of available for sale securities
7,102
Purchases of held to maturity securities
(1,295
1,255
370
Origination of loans, net of principal repayments
(539,491
(402,963
Purchases of loans and participating interest in loans
(4,091
(1,142
160,545
184,857
Purchases of property and equipment-net
(4,917
(8,253
Proceeds from sale of real estate held for sale-net
179
640
Other
(525
(315
Net cash used by investing activities
(371,776
(209,116
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Increase in deposits
256,144
249,006
Proceeds from FHLB advances
1,043,900
1,647,900
Repayment of FHLB advances
(940,000
(1,665,000
Repayment of repurchase agreement borrowings
(1,748
(4,954
Increase (decrease) in other borrowings, net
(17,979
2,743
Cash dividends paid
(4,244
(3,904
Repurchases of stock, net of forfeitures
ESOP shares earned (returned)
Exercise of stock options
Net cash provided by financing activities
337,400
226,445
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS
(10,533
30,499
CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD
51,767
CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS, END OF PERIOD
82,266
(Continued on next page)
BANNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)(Unaudited) (In thousands)For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest paid in cash
48,239
35,647
Taxes paid in cash
3,481
Non-cash investing and financing transactions:
42
Net change in accrued dividends payable
60
Change in other assets/liabilities
1,436
237
61
9
BANNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIESSELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1: Basis of Presentation and Critical Accounting Policies
Banner Corporation (BANR or the Company) is a bank holding company incorporated in the State of Washington. The Company is primarily engaged in the business of commercial banking through its wholly owned subsidiary, Banner Bank (the Bank). The Bank is a Washington-chartered commercial bank that conducts business from its main office in Walla Walla, Washington, and its 58 branch offices and 12 loan production offices located in 24 counties in Washington, Oregon and Idaho. The Company is subject to regulation by the Federal Reserve Board (FRB). The Bank is subject to regulation by the State of Washington Department of Financial Institutions Division of Banks and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
In the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition and related interim consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows reflect all adjustments (which include reclassifications and normal recurring adjustments) that are necessary for a fair presentation in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the financial statements. Various elements of the Company's accounting policies, by their nature, are inherently subject to estimation techniques, valuation assumptions and other subjective assessments. In particular, management has identified several accounting policies that, due to the judgments, estimates and assumptions inherent in those policies, are critical to an understanding of the Company's financial statements. These policies relate to (i) the methodology for the recognition of interest income, (ii) determination of the provision and allowance for loan and lease losses and (iii) the valuation of investment securities, goodwill, mortgage servicing rights and real estate held for sale. These policies and the judgments, estimates and assumptions are described in greater detail below in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Management believes that the judgments, estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the Company's consolidated financial statements are appropriate based on the factual circumstances at the time. However, given the sensitivity of the financial statements to these critical accounting policies, the use of different judgments, estimates and assum ptions could result in material differences in the Company's results of operations or financial condition.
Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2005 consolidated financial statements and/or schedules to conform to the 2006 presentation. These reclassifications may have affected certain ratios for the prior periods. The effect of these reclassifications is considered immaterial. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
The information included in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed with the SEC. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.
Note 2: Recent Developments and Significant Events
Insurance Recovery: In June 2006, Banner announced that it had reached a $5.5 million insurance settlement relating to losses incurred in 2001. The net amount of the settlement, after costs, resulted in a $5.4 million credit to other operating expenses and contributed approximately $3.4 million, or $0.28 per share, to second quarter earnings.
Balance Sheet Restructuring: Late in the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company completed a balance-sheet restructuring designed to pay down high interest rate FHLB borrowings and reduce the size of the investment portfolio. To effect the restructuring, the Company sold $207 million of securities at a $7.3 million net loss before tax and used a portion of the proceeds of the sale to prepay $142 million of high-cost, fixed-term FHLB borrowings, incurring pre-tax prepayment penalties of $6.1 million. The remainder of the proceeds were applied to repay other relatively high-cost, short-term borrowings from the FHLB. The total cost of the transactions was $13.4 million, with a tax benefit of $4.8 million, resulting in an after-tax cost of $8.6 million or $0.72 per diluted share.
Branch Expansion: Over the past three years, the Company has invested significantly in expanding the Bank's branch and distribution systems with a primary emphasis on the greater Boise, Idaho and Portland, Oregon markets and the Puget Sound region of Washington. This branch expansion is a significant element in the Company's strategy to grow loans, deposits and customer relationships. This emphasis on growth has resulted in an elevated level of operating expenses; however, management believes that over time these new branches should help improve profitability by providing low cost core deposits which will allow the Bank to proportionately reduce higher cost borrowings as a source of funds. Since March 2004, the Bank has opened 16 new branch offices, relocated five additional branch offices and significantly refurbished its main office in Walla Walla.
Long-Term Incentive Plan: In June 2006, the Board of Directors adopted the Banner Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan ("Plan") effective July 1, 2006. The Plan is an account-based type of benefit, the value of which is indirectly related to changes in the value of Company stock and changes in the Bank's average earnings rate. The primary objective of the Plan is for executives who remain with the Company or the Bank for a sufficient period of time to share in the increases in the value of Company stock. Although the Plan benefits are tied to the value of Company stock, the Plan benefit is paid in cash rather than Company stock. Detailed information with respect to the plan was disclosed on a Form 8-K filed with SEC on June 19, 2006.
Adoption of SFAS 123(R): In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 123(R), Share-Based Payment, which replaces SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS 123(R) requires that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions (for example, stock options granted to employees of the Company) be recognized in the Company's consolidated financial statements. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 123(R) effective January 1, 2006, and has recorded $129,000 and $308,900, respectively, of compensation cost relating to share-based transactions for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006 (see Note 6).
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements: In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets - an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 140. The Statement specifies under what situations servicing assets and servicing liabilities must be recognized. It requires these assets and liabilities to be initially measured at fair value and specifies acceptable measurement methods subsequent to their recognition. Separate presentation in the financial statements and additional disclosures are also required. This statement will be effective beginning January 1, 2007. The Company does not expect that adoption of the Statement will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainties in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return, and also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company is assessing the impact of adopting the new pronouncement, which will become effective January 1, 2007, but it is not expected to have a material impact.
Sale of $25 Million of Trust Preferred Securities: In August 2005, the Company completed the issuance of $25.8 million of junior subordinated debentures (debentures) in connection with a private placement of pooled trust preferred securities. The trust preferred securities were issued by Banner Capital Trust V, a special purpose business trust formed by the Company. The debentures have been recorded as a liability on the statement of financial condition but, subject to limitation under current Federal Reserve guidelines, a portion of the debentures qualify as Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital purposes. The proceeds from this offering are expected to be used primarily to fund growth, including acquisitions, by augmenting the Bank's regulatory capital. Under the terms of the transaction, the trust preferred securities and debentures have a maturity of 30 years and are redeemable after five years with certain exceptions. The holders of the trust preferred securities and deben tures are entitled to receive cumulative cash distributions at a variable annual rate. The interest rate is reset quarterly to equal three-month LIBOR plus 1.57% and was 5.41% at issuance and 6.76% at June 30, 2006. The Company's previously issued trust preferred securities have similar provisions but carry different interest rates than this most recent issuance. In accordance with Financial Interpretation No. (FIN) 46, the trusts are not consolidated with the Company's financial statements.
Note 3: Business Segments
The Company is managed by legal entity and not by lines of business. The Bank is a community oriented commercial bank chartered in the State of Washington. The Bank's primary business is that of a traditional banking institution, gathering deposits and originating loans for its portfolio in its primary market area. The Bank offers a wide variety of deposit products to its consumer and commercial customers. Lending activities include the origination of real estate, commercial and agricultural business and consumer loans. The Bank is also an active participant in the secondary market, originating residential loans for sale on both a servicing released and servicing retained basis. In addition to interest income on loans and investment securities, the Bank receives other income from deposit service charges, loan servicing fees and from the sale of loans and investments. The performance of the Bank is reviewed by the Company's executive management and Board of Directors on a monthly bas is. All of the executive officers of the Company are members of the Bank's executive management team.
Generally accepted accounting principles establish standards to report information about operating segments in annual financial statements and require reporting of selected information about operating segments in interim reports to stockholders. The Company has determined that its current business and operations consist of a single business segment.
11
Note 4: Additional Information Regarding Interest-Bearing Deposits and Securities
Encumbered Securities: Securities labeled "Encumbered" are pledged securities that are subject to certain agreements which may allow the secured party to either sell and replace them with similar but not the same security or otherwise pledge the securities. In accordance with SFAS No. 140, the amounts have been separately identified in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as "Encumbered."
The following table sets forth additional detail on the Company's interest-bearing deposits and securities at the dates indicated (at carrying value) (in thousands):
Interest-bearing deposits included in cash and due from banks
32,547
35,078
15,619
160,733
178,973
307,589
Other securities-taxable
82,365
83,731
220,660
Other securities-tax exempt
43,609
44,844
45,460
Equity securities with dividends
3,439
3,685
3,721
Total securities
290,146
311,233
577,430
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock
358,537
382,155
628,893
The following table provides additional detail on income from deposits and securities for the periods indicated (in thousands):
Mortgage-backed securities interest
Taxable interest income
2,397
2,553
4,741
Tax-exempt interest income
488
509
981
1,012
Other stock-dividend income
37
78
68
FHLB stock dividends (reversal)
(29
3,845
6,529
7,706
13,051
Note 5: Calculation of Weighted Average Shares Outstanding for Earnings Per Share (EPS)
The following table reconciles total shares originally issued to weighted shares outstanding used to calculate earnings per share data (in thousands):
Total shares originally issued
(1,017
(1,294
(1,063
(1,325
Less unallocated shares held by the ESOP
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
11,882
11,532
11,836
11,501
314
363
325
407
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
12,196
11,895
12,161
11,908
12
Note 6: Stock Based Compensation Plans
The Company operates the following stock-based compensation plans as approved by the shareholders: the 1996 Management Recognition and Development Plan (MRP), a restricted stock plan; and the 1996 Stock Option Plan, the 1998 Stock Option Plan and the 2001 Stock Option Plan (together, SOPs).
MRP Stock Grants: Under the MRP, the Company is authorized to grant up to 528,075 shares of restricted stock to its directors, officers and employees, of which 5,415 shares remain available for future grants at June 30, 2006. On July 26, 2006, this stock program expired with no additional grants issued. Shares granted under the MRP vest ratably over a five-year period. The Consolidated Statements of Income for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 reflect an accrual of $46,500 and $46,700, and $93,100 and $90,800, respectively, for these grant awards. The MRP stock grants' fair value equals their intrinsic value on the date of the grant.
A summary of the Company's unvested MRP shares activity with respect to the six months ended June 30, 2006 follows:
Shares
Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Unvested at December 31, 2005
28,080
21.80
Granted
Vested
(8,020
20.29
Forfeited
Unvested at June 30, 2006
20,060
22.41
Stock Options: Under the 1996, 1998 and 2001 SOPs, the Company has reserved 2,284,186 shares for issuance pursuant to the exercise of stock options which may be granted to directors and employees. The exercise price of the stock options is set at 100% of the fair market value of the stock price at date of grant. Such options have graded vesting of 20% per year and any unexercised options will expire ten years after date of grant or 90 days after employment or service ends.
There were no stock options granted by the Company during the six months ended June 30, 2006. Also, there were no significant modifications made to any stock grants during the period. The fair values of stock options granted are amortized as compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the grant.
Stock-based compensation costs related to the SOPs were $129,000 and $308,900 for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. The SOPs' stock option grant compensation costs are generally based on the fair value calculated from the Black-Scholes option pricing on the date of the grant award. Assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model are an expected volatility based on the six-month historical volatility at the date of the grant. The expected term is based on the remaining contractual life of the graded vesting. The Company bases the estimate of risk-free interest rate on the U.S. Treasury Constant Maturities Indices in effect at the time of the grant. The dividend yield is based on the current quarterly dividend in effect at the time of the grant.
Quarter Ended
Annual dividend yield
N/A
2.31
%
Expected volatility
31.2
Risk free interest rates
3.73 to 4.15
Expected lives
5 to 9
yrs
As part of the requirements of SFAS 123(R), the Company is required to estimate potential forfeitures of stock grants and adjust compensation cost recorded accordingly. The estimate of forfeitures will be adjusted over the requisite service period to the extent that actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from such estimates. Changes in estimated forfeitures will be recognized through a cumulative catch-up adjustment in the period of change and will also impact the amount of stock compensation expense to be recognized in future periods.
13
A summary of the Company's SOP stock compensation activity for the six months ended June 30, 2006 follows (in thousands, except shares and per share data):
Weighted-Average Exercise Price
Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2005
1,023,673
19.38
Exercised
(250,524
14.91
(8,251
26.87
Outstanding at June 30, 2006
764,898
20.77
5.8
13,596
Vested at June 30, 2006 and expected to vest
753,264
20.70
13,437
Exercisable at June 30, 2006
502,713
18.68
4.9
9,985
The intrinsic value of stock options is calculated as the amount by which the market price of our common stock exceeds the exercise price of the option.
A summary of the Company's unvested stock option activity with respect to the six months ended June 30, 2006 follows:
340,655
7.71
(70,370
7.48
(8,100
7.91
262,185
7.76
The weighted average fair value per share of stock options granted to employees during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $0 and $8.86, respectively. During the same periods, the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $5.3 million and $1.2 million, respectively.
The Company had $750,000 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to stock options at June 30, 2006 that are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 5.8 years.
During the six months ended June 30, 2006, $3.7 million was received for the exercise of stock options. Cash was not used to settle any equity instruments previously granted. The Company issues shares from authorized but unissued shares upon the exercise of stock options. The Company does not currently expect to repurchase shares from any source to satisfy such obligations under the SOPs.
The following are the stock-based compensation costs recognized in the Company's condensed consolidated statements of income (in thousands):
174
47
402
Total decrease in income before income taxes
Decrease in provision for income taxes
(31
(17
(58
(33
Decrease in net income
143
30
344
58
As discussed above, results for prior periods have not been restated to reflect the effects of implementing SFAS 123(R). The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to stock options granted under the Company's stock option plans for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2005. For purposes of this pro forma disclosure, the value of the stock options was estimated using a Black-Scholes option-pricing formula and amortized to expense over the options' graded vesting periods (in thousands, except per share amounts).
Basic:
As reported
Pro forma
4,735
9,141
Diluted:
Net income per common share:
0.41
0.40
15
ITEM 2 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Management's Discussion and Analysis and other portions of this report contain certain forward-looking statements concerning the future operations of the Company. Management desires to take advantage of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and is including this statement for the express purpose of availing the Company of the protections of such safe harbor with respect to all forward-looking statements contained in this report and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. We have used forward-looking statements to describe future plans and strategies, including our expectations of the Company's future financial results. Management's ability to predict results or the effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to, regional and general economic conditions, management's ability to maintain acceptable asset quality and to successfully resolve new or existing credit issues, the success of our branch expansion strategy, our ability to control operating costs, competition, changes in interest rates, deposit flows, demand for mortgages and other loans, real estate values, agricultural commodity prices, crop yields and weather conditions, loan delinquency rates, changes in accounting principles, practices, policies or guidelines, changes in legislation or regulation, other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors affecting operations, pricing, products and services. Accordingly, these factors should be considered in evaluating the forward-looking statements, and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. The Company undertakes no responsibility to update or revise any forward-looking statements.
Banner Corporation, a Washington corporation, is primarily engaged in the business of commercial banking through its wholly owned subsidiary, Banner Bank. The Bank is a Washington-chartered commercial bank, the deposits of which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The Bank conducts business from its main office in Walla Walla, Washington, and its 58 branch offices and 12 loan production offices located in 24 counties in Washington, Oregon and Idaho.
Banner Bank is a regional bank which offers a wide variety of commercial banking services and financial products to individuals, businesses and public sector entities in its primary market areas. The Bank's primary business is that of a traditional banking institution, accepting deposits and originating loans in locations surrounding its offices in portions of Washington, Oregon and Idaho. The Bank is also an active participant in the secondary market, engaging in mortgage banking operations largely through the origination and sale of one- to four-family residential loans. Lending activities include commercial business and commercial real estate loans, agriculture business loans, construction and land development loans, one- to four-family residential loans and consumer loans. A portion of the Bank's construction and mortgage lending activities are conducted through its subsidiary, Community Financial Corporation (CFC), which is located in the Lake Oswego area of Portland, Oregon.
Over the past three years the Company has invested significantly in expanding the Bank's branch and distribution systems with a primary emphasis on the greater Boise, Idaho and Portland, Oregon markets and the Puget Sound region of Washington. This branch expansion is a significant element in the Company's strategy to grow loans, deposits and customer relationships. This emphasis on growth has resulted in an elevated level of operating expenses; however, management believes that over time these new branches should help improve profitability by providing low cost core deposits which will allow the Bank to proportionately reduce higher cost borrowings as a source of funds. Since March 2004, the Bank has opened 16 new branch offices, relocated five additional branch offices and significantly refurbished its main office in Walla Walla. The Company is committed to continuing this branch expansion strategy for the next two to three years and has plans and projects in process for four new off ices expected to open in the next twelve months and is exploring other opportunities which likely will result in additional new offices either late in 2006 or in 2007.
The Bank offers a wide range of loan products to meet the demands of its customers. Historically, lending activities have been primarily directed toward the origination of real estate and commercial loans. Real estate lending activities have been significantly focused on residential construction and first mortgages on owner occupied, one- to four-family residential properties. To an increasing extent in recent years, lending activities have also included the origination of multifamily and commercial real estate loans. Commercial lending has been directed toward meeting the credit and related deposit needs of various small- to medium-sized business and agri-business borrowers operating in the Bank's primary market areas. The Bank has also recently increased its emphasis on consumer lending, although the portion of the loan portfolio invested in consumer loans is still relatively small. While continuing its commitment to construction and residential lending, management expects commerci al lending, including commercial real estate, agricultural and consumer lending, to become increasingly important activities for the Bank.
Deposits, FHLB advances (or borrowings) and loan repayments are the major sources of the Bank's funds for lending and other investment purposes. The Bank competes with other financial institutions and financial intermediaries in attracting deposits. There is strong competition for transaction balances and savings deposits from commercial banks, credit unions and nonbank corporations, such as securities brokerage companies, mutual funds and other diversified companies, some of which have nationwide networks of offices. Much of the focus of the Bank's recent branch expansion, relocations and renovation has been directed toward attracting additional deposit customer relationships and balances.
The Bank generally attracts deposits from within its primary market areas by offering a broad selection of deposit instruments, including demand checking accounts, negotiable order of withdrawal (NOW) accounts, money market deposit accounts, regular savings accounts, certificates of deposit, cash management services and retirement savings plans. Deposit account terms vary according to the minimum balance required, the time periods the funds must remain on deposit and the interest rate, among other factors. In determining the terms of deposit accounts, the Bank considers current market interest rates, profitability to the Bank, matching deposit and loan products, and customer preferences and concerns.
The operating results of the Company depend primarily on its net interest income, which is the difference between interest income on interest-earning assets, consisting of loans and investment securities, and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, composed primarily of customer deposits, FHLB advances, junior subordinated debentures and other borrowings. Net interest income is primarily a function of the Company's interest rate spread, which is the difference between the yield earned on interest-earning assets and the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities, as well as a function of the average balances of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. As more fully explained below, the Company's net interest income before provision for loan losses increased $4.5 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared to the same period a year earlier, primarily as a result of strong growth in interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and changes in t he mix of both interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, including the effects of certain balance-sheet restructuring transactions completed in the quarter ended December 31, 2005.
The Company's net income also is affected by provisions for loan losses and the level of its other income, including deposit service charges, loan origination and servicing fees, and gains and losses on the sale of loans and securities, as well as its operating expenses and income tax provisions. The provision for loan losses was $2.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, an increase $1.0 million compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2005. The increase was generally in response to the overall growth of the loan portfolio as credit quality and economic conditions remained essentially unchanged. Other operating income increased by $375,000 to $5.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, from $4.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, primarily as a result of increased deposit fees and service charges. Other operating expenses decreased $2.8 million to $20.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, from $22.8 million for the same period in 2005, due to a net $5.4 m illion insurance recovery in the current quarter. Excluding the insurance recovery, operating expenses were $25.4 million, an increase of 11% from a year earlier, largely reflecting the Company's continued growth.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is intended to assist in understanding the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Selected Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q.
Comparison of Financial Condition at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005
General: For the first six months of the year, total assets increased $356 million, or 12%, from $3.041 billion at December 31, 2005, to $3.397 billion at June 30, 2006. The increase largely resulted from growth in the loan portfolio and was funded primarily by deposit growth and an increase in FHLB advances. Net loans receivable (gross loans less loans in process, deferred fees and discounts, and allowance for loan losses) increased $382 million, or 16%, from $2.409 billion at December 31, 2005, to $2.790 billion at June 30, 2006. Loan portfolio growth was broad-based; however, reflecting continued strong demand for and sales of new homes in many of the markets served by the Bank, by far the most significant growth occurred in construction and land loans. Loans to finance the construction of one- to four-family residential real estate increased by $141 million, or 40%, and land and development loans increased by $82 million, or 36%, since December 31, 2005. In addition, loans for the construction of commercial real estate increased by $43 million, or 83%. Loan growth also included loans to finance existing commercial real estate, which increased by $40 million, or 7%, existing one- to four-family residential properties, which increased by $32 million, or 9%, consumer loans, which increased by $17 million, or 19%, commercial loans, which increased by $30 million, or 7%, and agricultural loan totals, which increased by $8 million, or 6%. As well as reflecting seasonal patterns, the modest increase in agricultural loans also reflects the repayment of a large non-performing loan in the first quarter of the current year which, as noted below, included the collection of a significant amount of delinquent interest.
Securities available for sale and held to maturity decreased $21 million, or 7%, from $311 million at December 31, 2005, to $290 million at June 30, 2006, primarily as a result of prepayments on mortgage-backed securities, but also as a result of modest declines in the fair value of the portion of the portfolio designated as available for sale as a result of changes in the level of market interest rates. As noted in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, higher market interest rates resulted in an unrealized loss of $8.1 million for the Company's available for sale securities at June 30, 2006, compared to an unrealized loss of $3.8 million at December 31, 2005. The Company also had an increase of $779,000 in bank-owned life insurance from the growth of cash surrender values on existing policies. Property and equipment increased by $2.0 million to $52 million at June 30, 2006, from $50 million at December 31, 2005. The increase included additional site, construction and equ ipment costs associated with new facilities recently opened or in progress as part of the Company's continuing branch expansion strategy.
Deposits grew $256 million, or 11%, from $2.323 billion at December 31, 2005, to $2.579 billion at June 30, 2006. Non-interest-bearing deposits decreased $11 million, or 3%, to $318 million while interest-bearing deposits increased $267 million, or 13%, to $2.262 billion from the December 31, 2005 amounts. In addition to certain seasonal patterns, it is management's belief that the decline in non-interest-bearing deposits in part reflects changes in customer behavior in response to the current increasing interest rate environment. In particular, as interest rates on new certificates of deposits have increased, certain customers have moved balances from both non-interest-bearing and interest-bearing transaction accounts into higher yielding certificate accounts. Nonetheless, the aggregate total of transaction and savings accounts, including money market accounts, increased by $69 million to $1.191 billion, reflecting the Bank's focused efforts to grow these important core deposits. Inc reasing core deposits is a key element of the Bank's expansion strategy including the recent and planned addition and renovation of branch locations as explained in more detail below. FHLB advances increased $104 million from $265 million at December 31, 2005, to $369 million at June 30, 2006, while other borrowings decreased $20 million to $77 million at June 30, 2006. The increase in FHLB advances was driven by the need to fund particularly strong loan growth, which significantly outpaced deposit growth for the first six months of 2006. The decrease in other borrowings reflects repayment of a $26 million short-term federal funds purchased position that had been established on December 31, 2005, as well as a decrease of $2 million of repurchase agreement borrowings from securities dealers, which were partially offset by an $8 million increase in retail repurchase agreements that are primarily related to customer cash management accounts.
17
The following tables provide additional detail on the Company's loans and deposits (dollars in thousands):
Loans (including loans held for sale):
Commercial real estate
595,513
21.1
555,889
22.8
562,240
24.3
Multifamily real estate
141,996
5.0
144,512
5.9
119,668
5.2
Commercial construction
95,277
3.4
51,931
2.1
49,978
2.2
Multifamily construction
56,857
2.0
62,624
2.6
79,686
One- to four-family construction
489,187
17.3
348,661
14.3
311,648
13.5
Land and land development
310,369
11.0
228,436
9.4
190,245
8.2
Commercial business
472,061
16.7
442,232
18.1
436,428
18.9
One-to four-family real estate
397,648
14.1
365,903
15.0
327,249
14.0
Consumer
47,534
42,573
40,865
Total consumer
109,381
3.9
91,981
3.8
87,852
Total loans outstanding
2,824,033
100.00
2,439,731
2,314,645
Less allowance for loan losses
(30,898)
(29,788
Demand and NOW checking
655,643
25.4
622,235
26.8
600,483
27.6
Regular savings accounts
265,942
10.3
153,218
6.6
155,969
7.2
Money market accounts
268,949
10.4
345,757
14.9
275,797
12.7
Certificates which mature or reprice:
1,118,596
899,617
784,505
218,814
250,605
300,101
51,513
51,881
58,060
53.9
51.7
1,142,666
52.5
2,174,915
18
Comparison of Results of Operations for the Quarters and Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
General.
Compared to levels a year ago, total assets increased 8% to $3.397 billion at June 30, 2006, net loans increased 22% to $2.790 billion, deposits grew 19% to $2.579 billion, while borrowings, including junior subordinated debentures, decreased $161 million, or 23%, to $544 million, reflecting the balance sheet restructuring in the fourth quarter of 2005. Average interest-earning assets were $3.047 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, an increase of $193 million, or 7%, compared to $2.854 billion for the same period a year earlier.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income before provision for loan losses increased to $31.2 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared to $26.7 million for the prior year comparative quarter, largely as a result of the growth in average interest-earning assets noted above and the net interest margin expansion as discussed in the remainder of this paragraph. The net interest margin of 4.11% in the current quarter improved 36 basis points from the prior year's comparative quarter, reflecting the balance-sheet restructuring and the Company's success in attracting higher yielding loans and lower cost deposits. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, the net interest margin also improved 44 basis points from 3.73% to 4.17% from the prior year's comparative period. While this improvement in the net interest margin primarily reflects changes in both the asset and liability mix, including those resulting from the balance-sheet restructuring, the lagged effect of increasing m arket interest rates on deposit costs, as more fully explained below, also contributed to the improvement. In particular, the average asset mix for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006 reflected proportionately more loans, including more higher yielding commercial, construction and land development loans, and fewer investment securities than for the same period a year earlier. At the same time, the average funding liability base had proportionately more deposits, including more non-interest-bearing deposits, and proportionately fewer borrowings than in the prior year. Reflecting higher market interest rates as well as these mix changes, the yield on earning assets for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006 each increased by 124 basis points compared to the same periods a year ago while funding costs for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006 increased by 90 and 82 basis points, respectively, over the same period.
Interest Income. Interest income for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 was $58.9 million, compared to $46.4 million for the same quarter a year earlier, an increase of $13 million, or 27%. The increase in interest income occurred as a result of a 124 basis point increase in the average yield on interest-earning assets as well as significant growth in those assets. The yield on average interest-earning assets increased to 7.76% for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared to 6.52% for the same period a year earlier. Average loans receivable for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 increased by $481 million, or 22%, to $2.705 billion, compared to $2.224 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. Interest income on loans for the quarter increased by $15.2 million, or 38%, to $55.1 million from $39.8 million for the same period in the prior year, reflecting the impact of the increase in average loan balances combined with a 98 basis point increase in the average yield. The increase in av erage loan yield reflects the increases in the level of market interest rates during the past year, particularly in short-term interest rates including the prime rate and LIBOR indices which affect large portions of construction, land development, commercial and agricultural loans. The increase in average loan yields also reflects changes in the mix of the loan portfolio. The average yield on loans was 8.17% for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared to 7.19% for the same period in the prior year. While the recent level of market interest rates was significantly higher than a year earlier, loan yields did not change to the same degree as most fixed-rate loans did not adjust upward. In addition, changes in the average credit risk profile of new borrowers and competitive pricing pressure resulted in lower spreads and yields on new loan originations. These factors were somewhat offset by changes in the loan mix, as growth has been most significant in some of the higher yielding adjustable-rate loan categ ories.
The combined average balance of mortgage-backed securities, investment securities, daily interest-bearing deposits and FHLB stock decreased by $288 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, primarily reflecting the 2005 fourth quarter restructuring transactions, and the interest and dividend income from those investments decreased by $2.7 million compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2005. The average yield on the securities portfolio and cash equivalents increased to 4.51% for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, from 4.16% for the comparable quarter in 2005, largely reflecting the sale of lower yielding securities and the effect of higher market rates on certain adjustable rate securities. Consistent with recent periods and similar to the same quarter a year earlier, the Company did not record any dividend income on its FHLB of Seattle stock in the quarter ended June 30, 2006. Management does not expect that Banner Bank will receive any dividend income on this stock for the foreseeabl e future.
Interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2006 increased by $22.9 million, or 26%, to $111.9 million, from $89.0 million for the comparable period in 2005. This increase in interest income is the result of the same growth, mix and market interest rate trends which affected the quarterly results explained above. Interest income from loans increased $28.2 million, or 37%, to $104.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, from $76.0 million for the comparable period on in 2005. The increase in loan interest income reflects the impact of $433 million of growth in the average balance of loans receivable in addition to a 102 basis point increase in the yield on the loan balances. Interest
19
income from mortgage-backed and investment securities and FHLB stock for the six months ended June 30, 2006 decreased $5.3 million, to $7.7 million in the current period, reflecting a $286 million decrease in average balances which was partially offset by a 32 basis point increase in yield.
Interest Expense. Interest expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 was $27.7 million, compared to $19.7 million for the comparable period in 2005, an increase of $8.1 million, or 41%. The increase in interest expense was the result of the growth in interest-bearing liabilities combined with a 90 basis point increase in the average cost of all interest-bearing liabilities to 3.74% for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, from 2.84% for the comparable period in 2005, reflecting the higher levels of market interest rates and the maturity of certain lower-costing certificates of deposit and fixed-rate borrowings. Deposit interest expense increased $8.7 million, or 71%, to $20.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 compared to $12.1 million for the same quarter a year ago, as a result of the significant deposit growth over the past twelve months as well as an increase in the cost of interest-bearing deposits. Reflecting the branch expansion and other growth initiatives, averag e deposit balances increased $377 million, or 18%, to $2.446 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, from $2.069 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, while the average rate paid on deposit balances increased 106 basis points to 3.41%. Although deposit costs are significantly affected by changes in the level of market interest rates, changes in the average rate paid for interest-bearing deposits tend to be less severe and to lag changes in market interest rates. In addition, non-interest-bearing deposits help mitigate the effect of higher market rates on the Company's cost of deposits. This lower degree of volatility and lag effect for deposit pricing has been evident in the modest increase in deposit costs as the Federal Reserve has moved to increase short-term interest rates by 425 basis points from June 2003 to June 2006, including an increase of 200 basis points since June 30, 2005. Nonetheless, competitive pricing pressure for interest-bearing deposits has become quite intense in recent months, as many financial institutions have experienced strong loan growth and related funding needs. As a result, management expects that the cost of deposits will continue to increase in the near term regardless of any changes in market interest rates.
The Company's strong loan growth, which significantly outpaced deposit growth, also resulted in a substantial increase in FHLB advances during the current quarter. Despite their recent increase, average FHLB advances decreased to $345 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared to $573 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2005, reflecting the fourth quarter 2005 restructuring transactions and resulting in a $1.8 million decrease in the related interest expense. The average rate paid on FHLB advances increased to 4.82%, just 67 basis points higher than the same quarter a year earlier, as the effect of significantly higher market interest rates on the floating rate and short-term portions of the advances was substantially offset by the prepayment of $142 million of higher fixed-rate, fixed-term advances in connection with the balance-sheet restructuring transactions completed in the quarter ended December 31, 2005. Junior subordinated debentures which were issued in connect ion with trust preferred securities had an average balance of $98 million and an average cost of 8.08% (including amortization of prepaid underwriting costs) for the quarter ended June 30, 2006. Junior subordinated debentures outstanding in the same quarter of the prior year had an average balance of $72 million with a lower average rate of 6.63%. The junior subordinated debentures are adjustable-rate instruments with repricing frequencies of three to six months. The increased cost of the junior subordinated debentures reflects recent increases in short-term market interest rates. Other borrowings consist of retail repurchase agreements with customers and reverse repurchase agreements with investment banking firms secured by certain investment securities. The average balance for other borrowings increased $17 million, or 27%, to $81 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, from $64 million for the same period in 2005, while the related interest expense increased $374,000, to $766,000 from $392,000 f or the respective periods. The average balance of the wholesale borrowings from brokers decreased $7 million, which was more than offset by a $25 million increase in the average balance of customer retail repurchase agreements, reflecting growth in the Company's customer cash management services. The average rate paid on other borrowings was 3.78% in the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared to 2.47% for the same quarter in 2005. The Company's other borrowings generally have relatively short terms and therefore reprice to current market levels more quickly than deposits and FHLB advances, which generally lag current market rates, although, similar to deposits, customer retail repurchase agreements have a lower degree of volatility than most market rates.
A comparison of total interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2006 shows an increase of $13.7 million, or 37%, from the comparable period in 2005. The interest expense reflects an increase in average deposits of $369 million combined with a $218 million decrease in FHLB advances, trust preferred securities and other borrowings. The effect on interest expense of the $151 million increase in average interest-bearing liabilities was also accompanied by a 82 basis point increase in the interest paid on those liabilities. The effect of higher market rates on the cost of these funds was partially mitigated by deposit pricing characteristics noted above and as deposits, including non-interest-bearing deposits, became a proportionately larger source of funds.
The following tables provide additional comparative data on the Company's operating performance (dollars in thousands):
Investment securities and cash equivalents
133,843
275,192
133,896
273,199
Mortgage-backed obligations
172,634
319,105
176,000
322,799
Total average interest-earning assets
3,047,177
2,854,230
2,953,483
2,807,004
2,446,316
2,069,062
2,384,112
2,015,104
Advances from FHLB
344,865
572,716
317,350
576,122
81,251
63,776
81,160
65,782
Total average interest-bearing liabilities
2,970,374
2,777,722
2,880,564
2,729,176
Total average liabilities
3,005,802
2,810,131
2,913,919
2,759,971
Interest Rate Yield:
5.50
4.29
5.44
4.30
4.67
4.51
4.69
4.53
Interest Rate Expense:
3.41
2.35
3.24
2.26
4.82
4.15
4.62
4.04
3.78
2.47
3.64
2.22
Return on average assets
1.16
0.66
1.04
Return on average equity
16.10
9.15
14.12
8.92
Average equity / average assets
7.20
7.25
7.33
7.37
Average interest-earning assets / interest-bearing liabilities
102.59
102.75
102.53
102.85
Non-interest (other operating) expenses / average assets
2.48
3.02
2.77
2.98
Efficiency ratio [non-interest (other operating) expenses / revenues]
55.24
72.76
61.18
72.82
21
Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses. During the quarter ended June 30, 2006, the provision for loan losses was $2.3 million, an increase of $1.0 million from the quarter ended June 30, 2005, primarily in response to the significant growth of the loan portfolio. As discussed in Note 1 of the Selected Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the provision and allowance for loan losses is one of the most critical accounting estimates included in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. The provision for loan losses reflects the amount required to maintain the allowance for losses at an appropriate level based upon management's evaluation of the adequacy of general and specific loss reserves as more fully explained below.
The provision in the current quarter reflects lower levels of non-performing loans and net charge offs, balanced against growth in the size of the loan portfolio and continuing changes in the loan mix. Net charge-offs were $576,000 for the current quarter, compared to $1.2 million for the same quarter a year earlier, and non-performing loans decreased $5.4 million to $11 million at June 30, 2006, compared to $16 million at June 30, 2005. However, non-performing loans did increase by $2.3 million during the quarter from $8 million at March 31, 2006, and net charge-offs were also slightly higher in the current quarter than in the immediately preceding quarter. Generally, these non-performing loans reflect unique operating difficulties for the individual borrower rather than weakness in the overall economy of the Pacific Northwest, housing or real estate markets, or depressed farm commodity prices or adverse growing conditions. A comparison of the allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2006 and 2005 shows an increase of $4 million to $34 million at June 30, 2006, from $30 million at June 30, 2005. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans (loans receivable excluding allowance for losses) was 1.19% and 1.29% at June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The allowance as a percentage of non-performing loans increased to 318% at June 30, 2006, compared to 187% a year earlier.
In originating loans, the Company recognizes that losses will be experienced and that the risk of loss will vary with, among other things, the type of loan being made, the creditworthiness of the borrower over the term of the loan, general economic conditions and, in the case of a secured loan, the quality of the collateral for the loan. As a result, the Company maintains an allowance for loan losses consistent with the GAAP guidelines outlined in SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies. The Company has established systematic methodologies for the determination of the adequacy of its allowance for loan losses. The methodologies are set forth in a formal policy and take into consideration the need for an overall general valuation allowance as well as specific allowances that are tied to individual problem loans. The Company increases its allowance for loan losses by charging provisions for probable loan losses against the Company's income and values impaired loans consistent with the guidelines in SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, and SFAS No. 118, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan?Income Recognition and Disclosure.
The allowance for losses on loans is maintained at a level sufficient to provide for estimated losses based on evaluating known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio and upon management's continuing analysis of the factors underlying the quality of the loan portfolio. These factors include changes in the size and composition of the loan portfolio, delinquency rates, actual loan loss experience, current and anticipated economic conditions, detailed analysis of individual loans for which full collectibility may not be assured, and determination of the existence and realizable value of the collateral and guarantees securing the loans. Realized losses related to specific assets are applied as a reduction of the carrying value of the assets and charged immediately against the allowance for loan loss reserve. Recoveries on previously charged off loans are credited to the allowance. The reserve is based upon factors and trends identified by management at the time financial statements are prepared. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the allowance for loan losses. These agencies may require changes to the allowance based upon judgments different from those of management. Although management uses the best information available, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary due to economic, operating, regulatory and other conditions beyond the Company's control. The adequacy of general and specific reserves is based on management's continuing evaluation of the pertinent factors underlying the quality of the loan portfolio, including changes in the size and composition of the loan portfolio, delinquency rates, actual loan loss experience and current economic conditions, as well as individual review of certain large balance loans. Large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment include residential real estate and consumer loans and, as appropriate, smaller balance non-homogeneous loans. Larger balance non-homogeneous residential construction and land, commercial real estate, commercial business loans and unsecured loans are individually evaluated for impairment. Loans are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, management determines that it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors involved in determining impairment include, but are not limited to, the financial condition of the borrower, value of the underlying collateral and current status of the economy. Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, at the loan's observable market price or the fair value of collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Subsequent changes in the value of impaired loans are included within the provision for loan losses in the same manner in which impairment initially was recognized or as a reduction in the provision that would otherwise be reported. As of June 30, 2006, the Company had identified $10.3 million of impaired loans as defined by SFAS No. 114 and had established $1.8 million of loss allowances related to these loans.
The Company's methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance consists of several key elements, which include specific allowances, an allocated formula allowance and an unallocated allowance. Losses on specific loans are provided for when the losses are probable and estimable. General loan loss reserves are established to provide for inherent loan portfolio risks not specifically provided for. The level of general reserves is based on analysis of potential exposures existing in the Bank's loan portfolio including evaluation of historical trends, current market conditions and other relevant factors identified by management at the time the financial statements are prepared. The formula allowance is calculated by applying loss factors to outstanding loans, excluding loans with specific allowances. Loss factors are based on the Company's historical loss experience adjusted for significant factors including the experience of other banking organizations that, in management's judgment, affect the collectibility of the portfolio as of the evaluation date. The unallocated allowance is based upon management's evaluation of various factors that are not directly measured in the determination of the formula and specific allowances. This methodology may result in losses or recoveries differing significantly from those provided in the financial statements.
22<PAGE> The following tables provide additional detail on the Company's allowance for loan losses (dollars in thousands): Quarters Ended Six Months Ended June 30 June 30 Allowance for Loan Losses: 2006 2005 2006 2005 Balance, beginning of the period$31,894 $29,736 $30,898 $29,610 Provision for loan losses 2,300 1,300 3,500 2,503 Recoveries of loans previously charged off: One- to four-family real estate -- -- -- -- Commercial real estate -- 22 75 187 Multifamily real estate -- 6 -- 6 Construction and land 3 108 11 113 Commercial business 118 67 171 241 Agricultural business, including secured by farmland 32 7 42 21 Consumer 16 9 26 24 169 219 325 592 Loans charged off: One- to four-family real estate (27) (122) (62) (122)Commercial real estate -- -- -- (121)Multifamily real estate -- -- -- (8)Construction and land -- 1 -- (217)Commercial business (625) (604) (703) (723)Agricultural business, including secured by farmland -- (626) (213) (1,491)Consumer (93) (116) (127) (235) (745) (1,467) (1,105) (2,917) Net charge-offs (576) (1,248) (780) (2,325) Balance, end of the period$33,618 $29,788 $33,618 $29,788 Net charge-offs as a percentage of average net book value of loans outstanding for the period 0.02% 0.06% 0.03% 0.11% The following is a schedule of the Company's allocation of the allowance for loan losses (dollars in thousands): June 30 December 31 June 30 2006 2005 2005 Specific or allocated loss allowances: One- to four-family real estate$899 $860 $785 Commercial real estate 5,295 4,566 5,453 Multifamily real estate 846 839 598 Construction and land 9,928 7,223 6,979 Commercial business 10,773 9,741 10,047 Agricultural business, including secured by farmland 2,863 3,502 3,497 Consumer 785 561 545 Total allocated 31,389 27,292 27,904 Estimated allowance for undisbursed commitments 495 156 411 Unallocated 1,734 3,450 1,473 Total allowance for loan losses$33,618 $30,898 $29,788 Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans outstanding (loans receivable excluding allowance for losses) 1.19% 1.27% 1.29%Ratio of allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans 318% 296% 187%23<PAGE> Other Operating Income. Other operating income was $5.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, an increase of $375,000 from the quarter ended June 30, 2005. Deposit fee and service charge income increased by $490,000, or 20%, to $2.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared to $2.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, primarily reflecting growth in customer transaction accounts and increased merchant credit card services, although changes in certain pricing schedules also contributed to the increase. Loan servicing fees increased by $102,000 to $334,000 for the current quarter, from $232,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as the portfolio of serviced loans decreased modestly and prepayment fees and other servicing charges declined. Gain on sale of loans was nearly unchanged, decreasing by $191,000 to $1.5 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared to $1.6 million for the same quarter a year earlier as mortgage banking activity maintained a similar pace despite modestly higher mortgage rates. Gain on sale of loans was adversely affected by the increase in capitalized loan origination costs discussed in the following paragraph, which had the effect of increasing the cost basis in loans held for sale, as well as by competitive pressures in the mortgage market which tended to reduce the margin on sales compared to the prior year. Loan sales for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 totaled $82.2 million, compared to $106.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. Gain on sale of loans for the Company in the current quarter included $314,000 of fees on $34.5 million of loans which were brokered and are not reflected in the volume of loans sold. By comparison, in the quarter ended June 30, 2005, gain on sale of loans included $127,000 of fees on $11 million of brokered loans.Other operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2006 increased $880,000 to $9.5 million, from $8.6 million for the comparable period in 2005. Similar to the quarter's results, this includes a $978,000 increase in deposit fee and service charge income which was offset by a $270,000 decrease in the gain on sale of loans. In addition, loan servicing fees increased by $53,000 compared to the first six months of 2005. Loan sales decreased slightly from $184.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 to $160.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006.Other Operating Expenses. Other operating expenses decreased $2.8 million, or 12%, to $20.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, from $22.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, largely due to the net $5.4 million insurance recovery in the current quarter. Excluding the insurance recovery, operating expenses were $25.4 million, an increase of 11% from a year earlier, largely reflecting the Company's growth resulting from its branch expansion strategy and the increased loan origination activity. The increase in expenses includes operating costs associated with (1) the recent opening of six new branch offices in Vancouver and Burlington, Washington, Beaverton, Oregon and Boise, Twin Falls and Meridian, Idaho, (2) the relocation and upgrading of branch offices in Walla Walla and Pasco, Washington, (3) additional staffing to support the Bank's Small Business Administration (SBA) lending activities and to more effectively market its cash management services as well as the creation of an international banking department, and (4) the opening of new offices in Lynden, Lynnwood, Mercer Island, East Wenatchee and Spokane, Washington which occurred during the first six months of 2005. In addition, compensation was higher as a result of increased mortgage loan commissions and general wage and salary increases, as well as increased costs associated with employee benefit programs and employer-paid taxes. These increases were mitigated to a degree by an increase in the amount of capitalized loan origination costs, which reflects increases in both the cost to produce and the volume of new loan originations. The Company also continued its strong commitment to advertising and marketing expenditures, which were $2.1 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2006, an increase of $562,000 over the same period in the prior year. In large part reflecting start up costs associated with branch growth, other operating expenses as a percentage of average assets, excluding the effect of the insurance recovery, increased to 3.14% for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, from 3.02% for the quarter one year earlier. The Company's efficiency ratio, also excluding the insurance settlement, decreased to 70.01% for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 from 72.76% for the comparable period in 2005 as a higher level of revenues more than offset the increased operating expenses. The Company expects continued increases in the absolute level of operating expenses as a result of its announced expansion plans; however, over time, management believes that this expansion will lead to a lower relative cost of funds and enhanced revenues which should result in an improved efficiency ratio and stronger operating results.Other operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2006 decreased $894,000, or 2.0%, from $44.1 million the first six months of 2005, to $43.2 million in the current period. Excluding the $5.4 million insurance recovery, other operating expenses were $48.6 million. As explained above, the increase, aside from the insurance recovery, is primarily a result of the increase in compensation, occupancy and advertising expenses as locations, staffing and the volume of activity have expanded while the Bank positions itself for future growth. Partially offsetting these expenses was an increase in capitalized loan origination costs reflecting increased origination volumes as well as increased loan production costs.Income Taxes. Income tax expense was $4.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared to $2.2 million for the comparable period in 2005. The Company's effective tax rates for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 were 32.7% and 30.7%, respectively. The effective tax rates in both periods reflect the recording of tax credits related to certain Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) investments. The higher effective tax rate in the current period is primarily a result of a decrease in the relative combined effect of the tax credits from CRA investments and tax-exempt income from interest on municipal securities and earnings on bank-owned life insurance, compared to other taxable net revenue sources which increased substantially reflecting the growth in loans and deposits and the effects of the fourth quarter balance-sheet restructuring.Income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2006 increased to $7.8 million, compared to $4.2 million in the comparable period in 2005. The Company's effective tax rates for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 were 32.5% and 30.3%, respectively. The increased effective tax rate is due to the same reasons discussed in the review of quarterly results above.Asset QualityClassified Assets: State and federal regulations require that the Bank review and classify its problem assets on a regular basis. In addition, in connection with examinations of insured institutions, state and federal examiners have authority to identify problem assets and, if appropriate, require them to be classified. The Bank's Credit Policy Division reviews detailed information with respect to the composition and performance of 24<PAGE> the loan portfolio, including information on risk concentrations, delinquencies and classified assets. The Credit Policy Division approves all recommendations for new classified assets or changes in classifications, and develops and monitors action plans to resolve the problems associated with the assets. The Credit Policy Division also approves recommendations for establishing the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses. Significant problem loans are transferred to the Bank's Special Assets Department for resolution or collection activities. The Board of Directors is given a detailed report on classified assets and asset quality at least quarterly.Allowance for Loan Losses: In originating loans, the Company recognizes that losses will be experienced and that the risk of loss will vary with, among other things, the type of loan being made, the creditworthiness of the borrower over the term of the loan, general economic conditions and, in the case of a secured loan, the quality of the security for the loan. As a result, the Company maintains an allowance for loan losses consistent with GAAP guidelines. The Company increases its allowance for loan losses by charging provisions for probable loan losses against the Company's income. The allowance for losses on loans is maintained at a level which, in management's judgment, is sufficient to provide for estimated losses based on evaluating known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio and upon continuing analysis of the factors underlying the quality of the loan portfolio. The Company's asset quality indicators were significantly improved in the quarter ended June 30, 2006 compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2005. At June 30, 2006, the Company had an allowance for loan losses of $33.6 million, which represented 1.19% of total loans and 318% of non-performing loans, compared to 1.29% and 187%, respectively, at June 30, 2005. Non-Performing Assets: Non-performing assets decreased 36% to $11 million, or 0.32% of total assets, at June 30, 2006, compared to $17 million, or 0.55% of total assets, at June 30, 2005. At June 30, 2006, the Bank's largest non-performing loan exposure was for commercial loans totaling $3.8 million to a non-farm operating business which are primarily secured by ranch land in western Idaho and processing equipment. The second largest non-performing loan exposure was for loans totaling $1.7 million to an agricultural-related business operating in northeastern Oregon which are primarily secured by non-farm real estate and processing equipment. The third largest non-performing loan exposure was for loans to agricultural related businesses totaling $1.0 million primarily secured by agricultural real estate in central Washington. At June 30, 2006, the Company had $436,000 of real estate owned and other repossessed assets which primarily consisted of two single-family residences with a book value of $401,000. Very meaningful progress has been made in the past three years in reducing non-performing loans and improving asset quality, which has contributed significantly to the Bank's improved operating performance.The following table sets forth information with respect to the Bank's non-performing assets and restructured loans within the meaning of SFAS No. 15, Accounting by Debtors and Creditors for Troubled Debt Restructuring, at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands): June 30 December 31 June 30 2006 2005 2005 Non-performing assets at end of the period: Nonaccrual Loans: Secured by real estate: One- to four-family $944 $1,137 $1,158 Commercial 1,931 1,363 1,603 Multifamily -- -- -- Construction and land -- 479 2,931 Commercial business 5,898 2,543 4,020 Agricultural business, including secured by farmland 1,569 4,598 5,871 Consumer 2 229 276 10,344 10,349 15,589 Loans more than 90 days delinquent, still on accrual: Secured by real estate: One- to four-family 205 104 107 Commercial -- -- -- Multifamily -- -- -- Construction and land -- -- -- Commercial business -- -- -- Agricultural business, including secured by farmland -- -- -- Consumer 8 -- 3 213 104 110 Total non-performing loans 10,557 10,453 15,969 Real estate owned, held for sale, and other repossessed assets, net 436 506 1,290 Total non-performing assets at the end of the period$10,993 $10,959 $17,259 Non-performing loans as a percentage of total net loans before allowance for loan losses at end of the period 0.37% 0.43% 0.69%Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets at end of the period 0.32% 0.36% 0.55% Troubled debt restructuring at end of the period$-- $-- $-- 25<PAGE> Liquidity and Capital ResourcesThe Company's primary sources of funds are deposits, borrowings, proceeds from loan principal and interest payments and sales of loans, and the maturity of and interest income on mortgage-backed and investment securities. While maturities and scheduled repayments of loans and mortgage-backed securities are a predictable source of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by market interest rates, economic conditions and competition.The primary investing activity of the Company, through its subsidiaries, is the origination and purchase of loans and purchase of investment securities. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company had loan originations, net of principal repayments, of $539 million and purchased loans in the amount of $4 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company did not purchase any securities. This activity was funded primarily by principal repayments on securities, sales of loans and deposit growth. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company sold $161 million of loans and generated net deposit growth of $256 million, while FHLB advances increased $104 million and other borrowings decreased $20 million. The Bank must maintain an adequate level of liquidity to ensure the availability of sufficient funds to accommodate deposit withdrawals, to support loan growth, to satisfy financial commitments and to take advantage of investment opportunities. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Bank used its sources of funds primarily to fund loan commitments, repay FHLB advances and other borrowings, and pay maturing savings certificates and deposit withdrawals. At June 30, 2006, the Bank had outstanding loan commitments totaling $1.098 billion, including undisbursed loans in process totaling $1.040 billion. The Bank generally maintains sufficient cash and readily marketable securities to meet short-term liquidity needs. The Bank maintains a credit facility with the FHLB of Seattle, which provides for advances which, in aggregate, may equal the lesser of 35% of the Bank's assets or unencumbered qualifying collateral, which at June 30, 2006 would allow up to a total possible credit line of $624 million. Reflecting changes in the Company's asset mix, advances from the FHLB are more likely to be limited by available qualifying collateral than by the 35% of assets of calculation. Advances under this credit facility totaled $369 million, or 11% of the Bank's assets, at June 30, 2006.At June 30, 2006, certificates of deposit amounted to $1.389 billion, or 54% of the Bank's total deposits, including $1.119 billion which were scheduled to mature within one year. While no assurance can be given as to future periods, historically, the Bank has been able to retain a significant amount of its deposits as they mature. Management believes it has adequate resources to fund all loan commitments from customer deposits, FHLB advances, other borrowings, principal and interest payments and sale of mortgage loans, and that it can adjust the offering rates for savings certificates to retain deposits in changing interest rate environments.Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet RiskThe Bank has financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.The Bank's exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument from commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as for on-balance-sheet instruments. As of June 30, 2006, outstanding commitments consist of the following (in thousands):
The following tables provide additional detail on the Company's allowance for loan losses (dollars in thousands):
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Balance, beginning of the period
31,894
29,736
30,898
29,610
Provision for loan losses
Recoveries of loans previously charged off:
One- to four-family real estate
22
75
187
Construction and land
108
113
118
67
171
241
Agricultural business, including secured by farmland
169
219
592
Loans charged off:
(27
(122
(62
(121
1
(217
(625
(604
(703
(723
(626
(213
(1,491
(93
(116
(127
(235
(745
(1,467
(1,105
(2,917
Net charge-offs
(576
(1,248
(780
(2,325
Balance, end of the period
33,618
29,788
Net charge-offs as a percentage of average net book value of loans outstanding for the period
0.02
0.06
0.03
0.11
The following is a schedule of the Company's allocation of the allowance for loan losses (dollars in thousands):
Specific or allocated loss allowances:
899
860
785
5,295
4,566
5,453
846
839
598
9,928
7,223
6,979
10,773
9,741
10,047
3,502
3,497
561
545
Total allocated
31,389
27,292
27,904
Estimated allowance for undisbursed commitments
495
156
411
Unallocated
1,734
3,450
1,473
Total allowance for loan losses
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans outstanding
(loans receivable excluding allowance for losses)
1.19
1.27
1.29
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans
318
296
23<PAGE> Other Operating Income. Other operating income was $5.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, an increase of $375,000 from the quarter ended June 30, 2005. Deposit fee and service charge income increased by $490,000, or 20%, to $2.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared to $2.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, primarily reflecting growth in customer transaction accounts and increased merchant credit card services, although changes in certain pricing schedules also contributed to the increase. Loan servicing fees increased by $102,000 to $334,000 for the current quarter, from $232,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as the portfolio of serviced loans decreased modestly and prepayment fees and other servicing charges declined. Gain on sale of loans was nearly unchanged, decreasing by $191,000 to $1.5 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared to $1.6 million for the same quarter a year earlier as mortgage banking activity maintained a similar pace despite modestly higher mortgage rates. Gain on sale of loans was adversely affected by the increase in capitalized loan origination costs discussed in the following paragraph, which had the effect of increasing the cost basis in loans held for sale, as well as by competitive pressures in the mortgage market which tended to reduce the margin on sales compared to the prior year. Loan sales for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 totaled $82.2 million, compared to $106.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. Gain on sale of loans for the Company in the current quarter included $314,000 of fees on $34.5 million of loans which were brokered and are not reflected in the volume of loans sold. By comparison, in the quarter ended June 30, 2005, gain on sale of loans included $127,000 of fees on $11 million of brokered loans.Other operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2006 increased $880,000 to $9.5 million, from $8.6 million for the comparable period in 2005. Similar to the quarter's results, this includes a $978,000 increase in deposit fee and service charge income which was offset by a $270,000 decrease in the gain on sale of loans. In addition, loan servicing fees increased by $53,000 compared to the first six months of 2005. Loan sales decreased slightly from $184.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 to $160.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006.Other Operating Expenses. Other operating expenses decreased $2.8 million, or 12%, to $20.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, from $22.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, largely due to the net $5.4 million insurance recovery in the current quarter. Excluding the insurance recovery, operating expenses were $25.4 million, an increase of 11% from a year earlier, largely reflecting the Company's growth resulting from its branch expansion strategy and the increased loan origination activity. The increase in expenses includes operating costs associated with (1) the recent opening of six new branch offices in Vancouver and Burlington, Washington, Beaverton, Oregon and Boise, Twin Falls and Meridian, Idaho, (2) the relocation and upgrading of branch offices in Walla Walla and Pasco, Washington, (3) additional staffing to support the Bank's Small Business Administration (SBA) lending activities and to more effectively market its cash management services as well as the creation of an international banking department, and (4) the opening of new offices in Lynden, Lynnwood, Mercer Island, East Wenatchee and Spokane, Washington which occurred during the first six months of 2005. In addition, compensation was higher as a result of increased mortgage loan commissions and general wage and salary increases, as well as increased costs associated with employee benefit programs and employer-paid taxes. These increases were mitigated to a degree by an increase in the amount of capitalized loan origination costs, which reflects increases in both the cost to produce and the volume of new loan originations. The Company also continued its strong commitment to advertising and marketing expenditures, which were $2.1 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2006, an increase of $562,000 over the same period in the prior year. In large part reflecting start up costs associated with branch growth, other operating expenses as a percentage of average assets, excluding the effect of the insurance recovery, increased to 3.14% for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, from 3.02% for the quarter one year earlier. The Company's efficiency ratio, also excluding the insurance settlement, decreased to 70.01% for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 from 72.76% for the comparable period in 2005 as a higher level of revenues more than offset the increased operating expenses. The Company expects continued increases in the absolute level of operating expenses as a result of its announced expansion plans; however, over time, management believes that this expansion will lead to a lower relative cost of funds and enhanced revenues which should result in an improved efficiency ratio and stronger operating results.Other operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2006 decreased $894,000, or 2.0%, from $44.1 million the first six months of 2005, to $43.2 million in the current period. Excluding the $5.4 million insurance recovery, other operating expenses were $48.6 million. As explained above, the increase, aside from the insurance recovery, is primarily a result of the increase in compensation, occupancy and advertising expenses as locations, staffing and the volume of activity have expanded while the Bank positions itself for future growth. Partially offsetting these expenses was an increase in capitalized loan origination costs reflecting increased origination volumes as well as increased loan production costs.Income Taxes. Income tax expense was $4.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared to $2.2 million for the comparable period in 2005. The Company's effective tax rates for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 were 32.7% and 30.7%, respectively. The effective tax rates in both periods reflect the recording of tax credits related to certain Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) investments. The higher effective tax rate in the current period is primarily a result of a decrease in the relative combined effect of the tax credits from CRA investments and tax-exempt income from interest on municipal securities and earnings on bank-owned life insurance, compared to other taxable net revenue sources which increased substantially reflecting the growth in loans and deposits and the effects of the fourth quarter balance-sheet restructuring.Income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2006 increased to $7.8 million, compared to $4.2 million in the comparable period in 2005. The Company's effective tax rates for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 were 32.5% and 30.3%, respectively. The increased effective tax rate is due to the same reasons discussed in the review of quarterly results above.Asset QualityClassified Assets: State and federal regulations require that the Bank review and classify its problem assets on a regular basis. In addition, in connection with examinations of insured institutions, state and federal examiners have authority to identify problem assets and, if appropriate, require them to be classified. The Bank's Credit Policy Division reviews detailed information with respect to the composition and performance of 24<PAGE> the loan portfolio, including information on risk concentrations, delinquencies and classified assets. The Credit Policy Division approves all recommendations for new classified assets or changes in classifications, and develops and monitors action plans to resolve the problems associated with the assets. The Credit Policy Division also approves recommendations for establishing the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses. Significant problem loans are transferred to the Bank's Special Assets Department for resolution or collection activities. The Board of Directors is given a detailed report on classified assets and asset quality at least quarterly.Allowance for Loan Losses: In originating loans, the Company recognizes that losses will be experienced and that the risk of loss will vary with, among other things, the type of loan being made, the creditworthiness of the borrower over the term of the loan, general economic conditions and, in the case of a secured loan, the quality of the security for the loan. As a result, the Company maintains an allowance for loan losses consistent with GAAP guidelines. The Company increases its allowance for loan losses by charging provisions for probable loan losses against the Company's income. The allowance for losses on loans is maintained at a level which, in management's judgment, is sufficient to provide for estimated losses based on evaluating known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio and upon continuing analysis of the factors underlying the quality of the loan portfolio. The Company's asset quality indicators were significantly improved in the quarter ended June 30, 2006 compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2005. At June 30, 2006, the Company had an allowance for loan losses of $33.6 million, which represented 1.19% of total loans and 318% of non-performing loans, compared to 1.29% and 187%, respectively, at June 30, 2005. Non-Performing Assets: Non-performing assets decreased 36% to $11 million, or 0.32% of total assets, at June 30, 2006, compared to $17 million, or 0.55% of total assets, at June 30, 2005. At June 30, 2006, the Bank's largest non-performing loan exposure was for commercial loans totaling $3.8 million to a non-farm operating business which are primarily secured by ranch land in western Idaho and processing equipment. The second largest non-performing loan exposure was for loans totaling $1.7 million to an agricultural-related business operating in northeastern Oregon which are primarily secured by non-farm real estate and processing equipment. The third largest non-performing loan exposure was for loans to agricultural related businesses totaling $1.0 million primarily secured by agricultural real estate in central Washington. At June 30, 2006, the Company had $436,000 of real estate owned and other repossessed assets which primarily consisted of two single-family residences with a book value of $401,000. Very meaningful progress has been made in the past three years in reducing non-performing loans and improving asset quality, which has contributed significantly to the Bank's improved operating performance.The following table sets forth information with respect to the Bank's non-performing assets and restructured loans within the meaning of SFAS No. 15, Accounting by Debtors and Creditors for Troubled Debt Restructuring, at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands): June 30 December 31 June 30 2006 2005 2005 Non-performing assets at end of the period: Nonaccrual Loans: Secured by real estate: One- to four-family $944 $1,137 $1,158 Commercial 1,931 1,363 1,603 Multifamily -- -- -- Construction and land -- 479 2,931 Commercial business 5,898 2,543 4,020 Agricultural business, including secured by farmland 1,569 4,598 5,871 Consumer 2 229 276 10,344 10,349 15,589 Loans more than 90 days delinquent, still on accrual: Secured by real estate: One- to four-family 205 104 107 Commercial -- -- -- Multifamily -- -- -- Construction and land -- -- -- Commercial business -- -- -- Agricultural business, including secured by farmland -- -- -- Consumer 8 -- 3 213 104 110 Total non-performing loans 10,557 10,453 15,969 Real estate owned, held for sale, and other repossessed assets, net 436 506 1,290 Total non-performing assets at the end of the period$10,993 $10,959 $17,259 Non-performing loans as a percentage of total net loans before allowance for loan losses at end of the period 0.37% 0.43% 0.69%Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets at end of the period 0.32% 0.36% 0.55% Troubled debt restructuring at end of the period$-- $-- $-- 25<PAGE> Liquidity and Capital ResourcesThe Company's primary sources of funds are deposits, borrowings, proceeds from loan principal and interest payments and sales of loans, and the maturity of and interest income on mortgage-backed and investment securities. While maturities and scheduled repayments of loans and mortgage-backed securities are a predictable source of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by market interest rates, economic conditions and competition.The primary investing activity of the Company, through its subsidiaries, is the origination and purchase of loans and purchase of investment securities. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company had loan originations, net of principal repayments, of $539 million and purchased loans in the amount of $4 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company did not purchase any securities. This activity was funded primarily by principal repayments on securities, sales of loans and deposit growth. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company sold $161 million of loans and generated net deposit growth of $256 million, while FHLB advances increased $104 million and other borrowings decreased $20 million. The Bank must maintain an adequate level of liquidity to ensure the availability of sufficient funds to accommodate deposit withdrawals, to support loan growth, to satisfy financial commitments and to take advantage of investment opportunities. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Bank used its sources of funds primarily to fund loan commitments, repay FHLB advances and other borrowings, and pay maturing savings certificates and deposit withdrawals. At June 30, 2006, the Bank had outstanding loan commitments totaling $1.098 billion, including undisbursed loans in process totaling $1.040 billion. The Bank generally maintains sufficient cash and readily marketable securities to meet short-term liquidity needs. The Bank maintains a credit facility with the FHLB of Seattle, which provides for advances which, in aggregate, may equal the lesser of 35% of the Bank's assets or unencumbered qualifying collateral, which at June 30, 2006 would allow up to a total possible credit line of $624 million. Reflecting changes in the Company's asset mix, advances from the FHLB are more likely to be limited by available qualifying collateral than by the 35% of assets of calculation. Advances under this credit facility totaled $369 million, or 11% of the Bank's assets, at June 30, 2006.At June 30, 2006, certificates of deposit amounted to $1.389 billion, or 54% of the Bank's total deposits, including $1.119 billion which were scheduled to mature within one year. While no assurance can be given as to future periods, historically, the Bank has been able to retain a significant amount of its deposits as they mature. Management believes it has adequate resources to fund all loan commitments from customer deposits, FHLB advances, other borrowings, principal and interest payments and sale of mortgage loans, and that it can adjust the offering rates for savings certificates to retain deposits in changing interest rate environments.Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet RiskThe Bank has financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.The Bank's exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument from commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as for on-balance-sheet instruments. As of June 30, 2006, outstanding commitments consist of the following (in thousands):
Other Operating Income. Other operating income was $5.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, an increase of $375,000 from the quarter ended June 30, 2005. Deposit fee and service charge income increased by $490,000, or 20%, to $2.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared to $2.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, primarily reflecting growth in customer transaction accounts and increased merchant credit card services, although changes in certain pricing schedules also contributed to the increase. Loan servicing fees increased by $102,000 to $334,000 for the current quarter, from $232,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as the portfolio of serviced loans decreased modestly and prepayment fees and other servicing charges declined. Gain on sale of loans was nearly unchanged, decreasing by $191,000 to $1.5 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared to $1.6 million for the same quarter a year earlier as mortgage banking activity maintained a similar pace despite modestly higher mortgage rates. Gain on sale of loans was adversely affected by the increase in capitalized loan origination costs discussed in the following paragraph, which had the effect of increasing the cost basis in loans held for sale, as well as by competitive pressures in the mortgage market which tended to reduce the margin on sales compared to the prior year. Loan sales for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 totaled $82.2 million, compared to $106.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. Gain on sale of loans for the Company in the current quarter included $314,000 of fees on $34.5 million of loans which were brokered and are not reflected in the volume of loans sold. By comparison, in the quarter ended June 30, 2005, gain on sale of loans included $127,000 of fees on $11 million of brokered loans.
Other operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2006 increased $880,000 to $9.5 million, from $8.6 million for the comparable period in 2005. Similar to the quarter's results, this includes a $978,000 increase in deposit fee and service charge income which was offset by a $270,000 decrease in the gain on sale of loans. In addition, loan servicing fees increased by $53,000 compared to the first six months of 2005. Loan sales decreased slightly from $184.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 to $160.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006.
Other Operating Expenses. Other operating expenses decreased $2.8 million, or 12%, to $20.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, from $22.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, largely due to the net $5.4 million insurance recovery in the current quarter. Excluding the insurance recovery, operating expenses were $25.4 million, an increase of 11% from a year earlier, largely reflecting the Company's growth resulting from its branch expansion strategy and the increased loan origination activity. The increase in expenses includes operating costs associated with (1) the recent opening of six new branch offices in Vancouver and Burlington, Washington, Beaverton, Oregon and Boise, Twin Falls and Meridian, Idaho, (2) the relocation and upgrading of branch offices in Walla Walla and Pasco, Washington, (3) additional staffing to support the Bank's Small Business Administration (SBA) lending activities and to more effectively market its cash management services as well as the creation of an international banking department, and (4) the opening of new offices in Lynden, Lynnwood, Mercer Island, East Wenatchee and Spokane, Washington which occurred during the first six months of 2005. In addition, compensation was higher as a result of increased mortgage loan commissions and general wage and salary increases, as well as increased costs associated with employee benefit programs and employer-paid taxes. These increases were mitigated to a degree by an increase in the amount of capitalized loan origination costs, which reflects increases in both the cost to produce and the volume of new loan originations. The Company also continued its strong commitment to advertising and marketing expenditures, which were $2.1 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2006, an increase of $562,000 over the same period in the prior year. In large part reflecting start up costs associated with branch growth, other operating expenses as a percentage of average assets, excluding the effect of the insurance recovery, increased to 3.14% for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, from 3.02% for the quarter one year earlier. The Company's efficiency ratio, also excluding the insurance settlement, decreased to 70.01% for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 from 72.76% for the comparable period in 2005 as a higher level of revenues more than offset the increased operating expenses. The Company expects continued increases in the absolute level of operating expenses as a result of its announced expansion plans; however, over time, management believes that this expansion will lead to a lower relative cost of funds and enhanced revenues which should result in an improved efficiency ratio and stronger operating results.
Other operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2006 decreased $894,000, or 2.0%, from $44.1 million the first six months of 2005, to $43.2 million in the current period. Excluding the $5.4 million insurance recovery, other operating expenses were $48.6 million. As explained above, the increase, aside from the insurance recovery, is primarily a result of the increase in compensation, occupancy and advertising expenses as locations, staffing and the volume of activity have expanded while the Bank positions itself for future growth. Partially offsetting these expenses was an increase in capitalized loan origination costs reflecting increased origination volumes as well as increased loan production costs.
Income Taxes. Income tax expense was $4.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared to $2.2 million for the comparable period in 2005. The Company's effective tax rates for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 were 32.7% and 30.7%, respectively. The effective tax rates in both periods reflect the recording of tax credits related to certain Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) investments. The higher effective tax rate in the current period is primarily a result of a decrease in the relative combined effect of the tax credits from CRA investments and tax-exempt income from interest on municipal securities and earnings on bank-owned life insurance, compared to other taxable net revenue sources which increased substantially reflecting the growth in loans and deposits and the effects of the fourth quarter balance-sheet restructuring.
Income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2006 increased to $7.8 million, compared to $4.2 million in the comparable period in 2005. The Company's effective tax rates for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 were 32.5% and 30.3%, respectively. The increased effective tax rate is due to the same reasons discussed in the review of quarterly results above.
Classified Assets: State and federal regulations require that the Bank review and classify its problem assets on a regular basis. In addition, in connection with examinations of insured institutions, state and federal examiners have authority to identify problem assets and, if appropriate, require them to be classified. The Bank's Credit Policy Division reviews detailed information with respect to the composition and performance of
24<PAGE> the loan portfolio, including information on risk concentrations, delinquencies and classified assets. The Credit Policy Division approves all recommendations for new classified assets or changes in classifications, and develops and monitors action plans to resolve the problems associated with the assets. The Credit Policy Division also approves recommendations for establishing the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses. Significant problem loans are transferred to the Bank's Special Assets Department for resolution or collection activities. The Board of Directors is given a detailed report on classified assets and asset quality at least quarterly.Allowance for Loan Losses: In originating loans, the Company recognizes that losses will be experienced and that the risk of loss will vary with, among other things, the type of loan being made, the creditworthiness of the borrower over the term of the loan, general economic conditions and, in the case of a secured loan, the quality of the security for the loan. As a result, the Company maintains an allowance for loan losses consistent with GAAP guidelines. The Company increases its allowance for loan losses by charging provisions for probable loan losses against the Company's income. The allowance for losses on loans is maintained at a level which, in management's judgment, is sufficient to provide for estimated losses based on evaluating known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio and upon continuing analysis of the factors underlying the quality of the loan portfolio. The Company's asset quality indicators were significantly improved in the quarter ended June 30, 2006 compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2005. At June 30, 2006, the Company had an allowance for loan losses of $33.6 million, which represented 1.19% of total loans and 318% of non-performing loans, compared to 1.29% and 187%, respectively, at June 30, 2005.
the loan portfolio, including information on risk concentrations, delinquencies and classified assets. The Credit Policy Division approves all recommendations for new classified assets or changes in classifications, and develops and monitors action plans to resolve the problems associated with the assets. The Credit Policy Division also approves recommendations for establishing the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses. Significant problem loans are transferred to the Bank's Special Assets Department for resolution or collection activities. The Board of Directors is given a detailed report on classified assets and asset quality at least quarterly.
Allowance for Loan Losses: In originating loans, the Company recognizes that losses will be experienced and that the risk of loss will vary with, among other things, the type of loan being made, the creditworthiness of the borrower over the term of the loan, general economic conditions and, in the case of a secured loan, the quality of the security for the loan. As a result, the Company maintains an allowance for loan losses consistent with GAAP guidelines. The Company increases its allowance for loan losses by charging provisions for probable loan losses against the Company's income. The allowance for losses on loans is maintained at a level which, in management's judgment, is sufficient to provide for estimated losses based on evaluating known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio and upon continuing analysis of the factors underlying the quality of the loan portfolio. The Company's asset quality indicators were significantly improved in the quarter ended June 30, 2006 compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2005.
Non-Performing Assets: Non-performing assets decreased 36% to $11 million, or 0.32% of total assets, at June 30, 2006, compared to $17 million, or 0.55% of total assets, at June 30, 2005. At June 30, 2006, the Bank's largest non-performing loan exposure was for commercial loans totaling $3.8 million to a non-farm operating business which are primarily secured by ranch land in western Idaho and processing equipment. The second largest non-performing loan exposure was for loans totaling $1.7 million to an agricultural-related business operating in northeastern Oregon which are primarily secured by non-farm real estate and processing equipment. The third largest non-performing loan exposure was for loans to agricultural related businesses totaling $1.0 million primarily secured by agricultural real estate in central Washington. At June 30, 2006, the Company had $436,000 of real estate owned and other repossessed assets which primarily consisted of two single-family residences with a book value of $401,000. Very meaningful progress has been made in the past three years in reducing non-performing loans and improving asset quality, which has contributed significantly to the Bank's improved operating performance.
The following table sets forth information with respect to the Bank's non-performing assets and restructured loans within the meaning of SFAS No. 15, Accounting by Debtors and Creditors for Troubled Debt Restructuring, at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):
Non-performing assets at end of the period:
Nonaccrual Loans:
Secured by real estate:
One- to four-family
944
1,137
1,158
Commercial
1,931
1,363
1,603
Multifamily
479
2,931
5,898
2,543
4,020
1,569
4,598
5,871
229
276
10,344
10,349
15,589
Loans more than 90 days delinquent, still on accrual:
205
104
107
213
110
Total non-performing loans
10,557
10,453
15,969
Real estate owned, held for sale, and other repossessed assets, net
436
506
1,290
Total non-performing assets at the end of the period
10,993
10,959
17,259
Non-performing loans as a percentage of total net loans before allowance for loan losses at end of the period
0.37
0.69
Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets at end of the period
0.32
0.55
Troubled debt restructuring at end of the period
25<PAGE> Liquidity and Capital ResourcesThe Company's primary sources of funds are deposits, borrowings, proceeds from loan principal and interest payments and sales of loans, and the maturity of and interest income on mortgage-backed and investment securities. While maturities and scheduled repayments of loans and mortgage-backed securities are a predictable source of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by market interest rates, economic conditions and competition.The primary investing activity of the Company, through its subsidiaries, is the origination and purchase of loans and purchase of investment securities. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company had loan originations, net of principal repayments, of $539 million and purchased loans in the amount of $4 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company did not purchase any securities. This activity was funded primarily by principal repayments on securities, sales of loans and deposit growth. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company sold $161 million of loans and generated net deposit growth of $256 million, while FHLB advances increased $104 million and other borrowings decreased $20 million. The Bank must maintain an adequate level of liquidity to ensure the availability of sufficient funds to accommodate deposit withdrawals, to support loan growth, to satisfy financial commitments and to take advantage of investment opportunities. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Bank used its sources of funds primarily to fund loan commitments, repay FHLB advances and other borrowings, and pay maturing savings certificates and deposit withdrawals. At June 30, 2006, the Bank had outstanding loan commitments totaling $1.098 billion, including undisbursed loans in process totaling $1.040 billion. The Bank generally maintains sufficient cash and readily marketable securities to meet short-term liquidity needs. The Bank maintains a credit facility with the FHLB of Seattle, which provides for advances which, in aggregate, may equal the lesser of 35% of the Bank's assets or unencumbered qualifying collateral, which at June 30, 2006 would allow up to a total possible credit line of $624 million. Reflecting changes in the Company's asset mix, advances from the FHLB are more likely to be limited by available qualifying collateral than by the 35% of assets of calculation. Advances under this credit facility totaled $369 million, or 11% of the Bank's assets, at June 30, 2006.At June 30, 2006, certificates of deposit amounted to $1.389 billion, or 54% of the Bank's total deposits, including $1.119 billion which were scheduled to mature within one year. While no assurance can be given as to future periods, historically, the Bank has been able to retain a significant amount of its deposits as they mature. Management believes it has adequate resources to fund all loan commitments from customer deposits, FHLB advances, other borrowings, principal and interest payments and sale of mortgage loans, and that it can adjust the offering rates for savings certificates to retain deposits in changing interest rate environments.Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet RiskThe Bank has financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.The Bank's exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument from commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as for on-balance-sheet instruments. As of June 30, 2006, outstanding commitments consist of the following (in thousands):
The Company's primary sources of funds are deposits, borrowings, proceeds from loan principal and interest payments and sales of loans, and the maturity of and interest income on mortgage-backed and investment securities. While maturities and scheduled repayments of loans and mortgage-backed securities are a predictable source of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by market interest rates, economic conditions and competition.
The primary investing activity of the Company, through its subsidiaries, is the origination and purchase of loans and purchase of investment securities. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company had loan originations, net of principal repayments, of $539 million and purchased loans in the amount of $4 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company did not purchase any securities. This activity was funded primarily by principal repayments on securities, sales of loans and deposit growth. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company sold $161 million of loans and generated net deposit growth of $256 million, while FHLB advances increased $104 million and other borrowings decreased $20 million.
The Bank must maintain an adequate level of liquidity to ensure the availability of sufficient funds to accommodate deposit withdrawals, to support loan growth, to satisfy financial commitments and to take advantage of investment opportunities. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Bank used its sources of funds primarily to fund loan commitments, repay FHLB advances and other borrowings, and pay maturing savings certificates and deposit withdrawals. At June 30, 2006, the Bank had outstanding loan commitments totaling $1.098 billion, including undisbursed loans in process totaling $1.040 billion. The Bank generally maintains sufficient cash and readily marketable securities to meet short-term liquidity needs. The Bank maintains a credit facility with the FHLB of Seattle, which provides for advances which, in aggregate, may equal the lesser of 35% of the Bank's assets or unencumbered qualifying collateral, which at June 30, 2006 would allow up to a total possible credit line of $624 million. Reflecting changes in the Company's asset mix, advances from the FHLB are more likely to be limited by available qualifying collateral than by the 35% of assets of calculation. Advances under this credit facility totaled $369 million, or 11% of the Bank's assets, at June 30, 2006.
At June 30, 2006, certificates of deposit amounted to $1.389 billion, or 54% of the Bank's total deposits, including $1.119 billion which were scheduled to mature within one year. While no assurance can be given as to future periods, historically, the Bank has been able to retain a significant amount of its deposits as they mature. Management believes it has adequate resources to fund all loan commitments from customer deposits, FHLB advances, other borrowings, principal and interest payments and sale of mortgage loans, and that it can adjust the offering rates for savings certificates to retain deposits in changing interest rate environments.
The Bank has financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
The Bank's exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument from commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as for on-balance-sheet instruments. As of June 30
Contract or Notional Amount
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk:
Commitments to extend credit
Real estate secured for commercial, construction or land development
559,898
Revolving open-end lines secured by one- to four-family residential properties
49,373
Credit Card lines
19,334
Other, primarily business and agricultural loans
421,959
Real estate secured by one- to four-family residential properties
31,146
Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees
15,817
Total
1,097,527
Commitments to sell loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer, as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Many of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon; therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Each customer's creditworthiness is evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary upon extension of credit, is based on management's credit evaluation of the customer. The type of collateral held varies, but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, and income producing commercial properties.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee a customer's performance or payment to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.
Interest rates on residential one- to four-family mortgage loan applications are typically rate locked (committed) to customers during the application stage for periods ranging from 15 to 45 days, the most typical period being 30 days. Typically, pricing for the sale of these loans is locked with various qualified investors under a best-efforts delivery program at or near the time the interest rate is locked with the customer. The Bank makes every effort to deliver these loans before their rate locks expire. This arrangement generally requires the Bank to deliver the loans prior to the expiration of the rate lock. Delays in funding the loans can require a lock extension. The cost of a lock extension at times is borne by the customer and at times by the Bank. These lock extension costs paid by the Bank are not expected to have a material impact to operations. This activity is managed daily. Changes in the value of rate lock commitments are recorded as other assets and liabilities. See "Derivative Instruments" under Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed with the SEC.
The Company is a bank holding company registered with the Federal Reserve. Bank holding companies are subject to capital adequacy requirements of the Federal Reserve under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and the regulations of the Federal Reserve. The Bank, as a state-chartered, federally-insured commercial bank, is subject to the capital requirements established by the FDIC.
The capital adequacy requirements are quantitative measures established by regulation that require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of capital. The Federal Reserve requires the Company to maintain capital adequacy that generally parallels the FDIC requirements. The FDIC requires the Bank to maintain minimum ratios of Tier 1 total capital to risk-weighted assets as well as Tier 1 leverage capital to average assets. At June 30
The actual regulatory capital ratios calculated for the Company and the Bank as of June 30
Actual
Minimum for capitaladequacy purposes
Minimum to be categorizedas "well-capitalized" under prompt corrective actionprovisions
Amount
Ratio
June 30, 2006:
The Company - consolidated
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
330,772
10.99
240,765
8.00
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
280,890
9.33
120,383
4.00
Tier 1 leverage capital to average assets
8.76
128,319
The Bank
295,917
9.85
240,302
300,377
10.00
261,690
8.71
120,151
180,226
6.00
8.17
128,087
160,108
5.00
ITEM 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The financial condition and results of operations of the Company are influenced significantly by general economic conditions, including the absolute level of interest rates as well as changes in interest rates and the slope of the yield curve. The Company's profitability is dependent to a large extent on its net interest income, which is the difference between the interest received from its interest-earning assets and the interest expense incurred on its interest-bearing liabilities.
The activities of the Company, like all financial institutions, inherently involve the assumption of interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in market interest rates will have an adverse impact on the institution's earnings and underlying economic value. Interest rate risk is determined by the maturity and repricing characteristics of an institution's assets, liabilities and off-balance-sheet contracts. Interest rate risk is measured by the variability of financial performance and economic value resulting from changes in interest rates. Interest rate risk is the primary market risk affecting the Company's financial performance.
The greatest source of interest rate risk to the Company results from the mismatch of maturities or repricing intervals for rate sensitive assets, liabilities and off-balance-sheet contracts. This mismatch or gap is generally characterized by a substantially shorter maturity structure for interest-bearing liabilities than interest-earning assets. Additional interest rate risk results from mismatched repricing indices and formulae (basis risk and yield curve risk), and product caps and floors and early repayment or withdrawal provisions (option risk), which may be contractual or market driven, that are generally more favorable to customers than to the Company. An exception to this generalization in past periods has been the beneficial effect of interest rate floors on many of the Company's floating rate loans, which helped maintain higher loan yields despite declining levels of market interest rates. However, in the low interest rate environment accompanying those periods, the rate floors declined over time. Further, because these rate floors exceeded what would otherwise have been the note rate on certain variable or floating rate loans, those loans were less responsive to recently increasing market rates than has historically been the case, injecting an additional element of interest rate risk into the Company's operations. However, as of June 30, 2006, the Company has very few floating-rate loans with interest rates that have not increased to levels above their floors and therefore these loans should be more responsive to additional increases in market rates should they occur. An additional exception to the generalization has been the beneficial effect of lagging and somewhat inelastic pricing adjustments for interest rates on certain deposit products in the current rising market interest rate environment. This beneficial effect is particularly relevant to the administered rates paid on certain checking, savings and money market accounts and contributed to the Company's expanded net interest margin for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005 and the quarter ended June 30, 2006.
The principal objectives of asset/liability management are to evaluate the interest-rate risk exposure of the Company; to determine the level of risk appropriate given the Company's operating environment, business plan strategies, performance objectives, capital and liquidity constraints, and asset and liability allocation alternatives; and to manage the Company's interest rate risk consistent with regulatory guidelines and approved policies of the Board of Directors. Through such management, the Company seeks to reduce the vulnerability of its earnings and capital position to changes in the level of interest rates. The Company's actions in this regard are taken under the guidance of the Asset/Liability Management Committee, which is composed of members of the Company's senior management. The Committee closely monitors the Company's interest sensitivity exposure, asset and liability allocation decisions, liquidity and capital positions, and local and national economic conditions, and attempts to structure the loan and investment portfolios and funding sources of the Company to maximize earnings within acceptable risk tolerances.
The Company's primary monitoring tool for assessing interest rate risk is asset/liability simulation modeling which is designed to capture the dynamics of balance sheet, interest rate and spread movements and to quantify variations in net interest income resulting from those movements under different rate environments. The sensitivity of net interest income to changes in the modeled interest rate environments provides a measurement of interest rate risk. The Company also utilizes market value analysis, which addresses changes in estimated net market value of equity arising from changes in the level of interest rates. The net market value of equity is estimated by separately valuing the Company's assets and liabilities under varying interest rate environments. The extent to which assets gain or lose value in relation to the gains or losses of liability values under the various interest rate assumptions determines the sensitivity of net equity value to changes in interest rates and provides an additional measure of interest rate risk.
The interest rate sensitivity analysis performed by the Company incorporates beginning-of-the-period rate, balance and maturity data, using various levels of aggregation of that data, as well as certain assumptions concerning the maturity, repricing, amortization and prepayment characteristics of loans and other interest-earning assets and the repricing and withdrawal of deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities into an asset/liability computer simulation model. The Company updates and prepares simulation modeling at least quarterly for review by senior management and the Board of Directors. The Company believes the data and assumptions are realistic representations of its portfolio and possible outcomes under the various interest rate scenarios. Nonetheless, the interest rate sensitivity of the Company's net interest income and net market value of equity could vary substantially if different assumptions were used or if actual experience differs from the assumptions used.
The table of Interest Rate Risk Indicators sets forth, as of June 30
Interest Rate Risk Indicators
Estimated Change in
Change (in Basis Points) inInterest Rates (1)
Net Interest IncomeNext 12 Months
Net Market Value
(dollars in thousands)
+300
643
0.5
(68,181
(22.8
)%
+200
1,114
0.8
(45,545
(15.2
+100
1,327
1.0
(22,334
(7.5
0
-100
(1,843
(1.4
11,399
-200
(4,166
(3.1
6,816
2.3
-300
(5,502
(4.1
(5,266
(1.8
__________(1) Assumes an instantaneous and sustained uniform change in market interest rates at all maturities.
Another, although less reliable, monitoring tool for assessing interest rate risk is "gap analysis." The matching of the repricing characteristics of assets and liabilities may be analyzed by examining the extent to which such assets and liabilities are "interest sensitive" and by monitoring an institution's interest sensitivity "gap." An asset or liability is said to be interest sensitive within a specific time period if it will mature or reprice within that time period. The interest rate sensitivity gap is defined as the difference between the amount of interest-earning assets anticipated, based upon certain assumptions, to mature or reprice within a specific time period and the amount of interest-bearing liabilities anticipated to mature or reprice, based upon certain assumptions, within that same time period. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest sensitive liabilities. A gap is considered negative when the amount of interest sensitive liabilities exceeds the amount of interest sensitive assets. Generally, during a period of rising rates, a negative gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income while a positive gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income. During a period of falling interest rates, a negative gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income while a positive gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income.
Certain shortcomings are inherent in gap analysis. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods of repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as adjustable-rate loans, have features that restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. Further, in the event of a change in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels would likely deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the table. Finally, the ability of some borrowers to service their debt may decrease in the event of a severe interest rate increase.
The table of Interest Sensitivity Gap presents the Company's interest sensitivity gap between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities at June 30
Interest Sensitivity Gap as of June 30, 2006
Within6 Months
After 6MonthsWithin 1 Year
After 1 YearWithin 3Years
After 3 YearsWithin 5Years
After 5 YearsWithin 10Years
Over10 Years
Interest-earning assets: (1)
Construction loans
636,576
13,663
2,146
1,265
320
65
654,035
Fixed-rate mortgage loans
81,440
48,941
161,683
109,334
112,026
41,207
554,631
Adjustable-rate mortgage loans
439,588
85,406
276,604
129,175
425
227
931,425
Fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities
12,736
9,373
30,556
21,903
31,400
15,213
121,181
Adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities
3,617
3,344
11,329
9,228
21,984
49,502
Fixed-rate commercial/agricultural loans
49,055
21,320
53,060
20,644
4,806
59
148,944
Adjustable-rate commercial/agricultural loans
419,092
5,141
14,973
9,428
1,025
40
449,699
Consumer and other loans
51,853
6,631
14,015
15,734
8,169
544
96,946
Investment securities and interest- earning deposits
78,686
3,265
27,991
26,451
16,779
40,349
193,521
Total rate sensitive assets
1,772,643
197,084
592,357
343,162
196,934
97,704
3,199,884
Interest-bearing liabilities: (2)
Regular savings and NOW accounts
144,530
81,095
189,223
604,071
Money market deposit accounts
134,474
80,685
53,790
Certificates of deposit
745,880
372,019
219,511
38,353
13,160
FHLB advances
330,000
33,930
16,935
Retail repurchase agreements
59,623
136
428
60,187
Total rate sensitive liabilities
1,529,384
538,799
496,590
227,576
13,588
2,805,937
Excess (deficiency) of interest-sensitive assets over interest-sensitive liabilities
243,259
(341,715
95,767
115,586
183,346
393,947
Cumulative excess (deficiency) of interest- sensitive assets
(98,456
2,689
112,897
296,243
Cumulative ratio of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities
115.91
95.24
99.90
104.04
110.56
114.04
Interest sensitivity gap to total assets
7.16
(10.06
2.82
3.40
5.40
2.88
11.60
Ratio of cumulative gap to total assets
(2.90
(0.08
3.32
8.72
(footnotes on following page)
30<PAGE> Footnotes for Table of Interest Sensitivity Gap (1) Adjustable-rate assets are included in the period in which interest rates are next scheduled to adjust rather than in the period in which they are due to mature, and fixed-rate assets are included in the periods in which they are scheduled to be repaid based upon scheduled amortization, in each case adjusted to take into account estimated prepayments. Mortgage loans and other loans are not reduced for allowances for loan losses and non-performing loans. Mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities, other loans and investment securities are not adjusted for deferred fees and unamortized acquisition premiums and discounts.(2) Adjustable- and variable-rate liabilities are included in the period in which interest rates are next scheduled to adjust rather than in the period they are due to mature. Although the Bank's regular savings, NOW and money market deposit accounts are subject to immediate withdrawal, management considers a substantial amount of such accounts to be core deposits having significantly longer maturities. For the purpose of the gap analysis, these accounts have been assigned decay rates to reflect their longer effective maturities. If all of these accounts had been assumed to be short-term, the one year cumulative gap of interest-sensitive assets would have been negative $530.7 million, or (15.62%) of total assets. Interest-bearing liabilities for this table exclude certain non-interest-bearing deposits which are included in the average balance calculations in the table contained in Item 2, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations?Comparison of Results of Operations for the Quarters and Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005" of this report.
Footnotes for Table of Interest Sensitivity Gap (1) Adjustable-rate assets are included in the period in which interest rates are next scheduled to adjust rather than in the period in which they are due to mature, and fixed-rate assets are included in the periods in which they are scheduled to be repaid based upon scheduled amortization, in each case adjusted to take into account estimated prepayments. Mortgage loans and other loans are not reduced for allowances for loan losses and non-performing loans. Mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities, other loans and investment securities are not adjusted for deferred fees and unamortized acquisition premiums and discounts.
(2) Adjustable- and variable-rate liabilities are included in the period in which interest rates are next scheduled to adjust rather than in the period they are due to mature. Although the Bank's regular savings, NOW and money market deposit accounts are subject to immediate withdrawal, management considers a substantial amount of such accounts to be core deposits having significantly longer maturities. For the purpose of the gap analysis, these accounts have been assigned decay rates to reflect their longer effective maturities. If all of these accounts had been assumed to be short-term, the one year cumulative gap of interest-sensitive assets would have been negative $530.7 million, or (15.62%) of total assets. Interest-bearing liabilities for this table exclude certain non-interest-bearing deposits which are included in the average balance calculations in the table contained in Item 2, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations?Comparison of Results of Operations for the Quarters and Six Months Ended June 30
31<PAGE> ITEM 4 - Controls and ProceduresThe management of Banner Corporation is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act). A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that its objectives are met. Also, because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. As a result of these inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Further, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. (a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures: An evaluation of Company disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and several other members of the Company's senior management as of the end of the period covered by this report. The Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2006, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to the Company's management (including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) in a timely manner, and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms.
ITEM 4 - Controls and Procedures
The management of Banner Corporation is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act). A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that its objectives are met. Also, because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. As a result of these inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Further, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures: An evaluation of Company disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and several other members of the Company's senior management as of the end of the period covered by this report. The Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30
(b) Changes in Internal Controls: In the quarter ended June 30
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
In the normal course of business, the Company and the Bank have various legal proceedings and other contingent matters outstanding. These proceedings and the associated legal claims are often contested and the outcome of individual matters is not always predictable. These claims and counter claims typically arise during the course of collection efforts on problem loans or with respect to action to enforce liens on properties in which the Bank holds a security interest. The Company and the Bank are not a party to any pending legal proceedings that management believes would have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or operations of the Company.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in response to Item 1A to Part 1 in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (File No. 0-26584).
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The table below represents the issuer purchases of equity securities during the quarter covered by this report.
Period
Total Number of Shares Purchased (1)
Average Price Paid per Share
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of PubliclyAnnounced Plan
Maximum Number of Shares that May yet be Purchased Underthe Plan (2)
Beginning
Ending
April 1, 2006
April 30, 2006
280
35.745
100,000
May 1, 2006
May 31, 2006
43,174
37.726
June 1, 2006
June 30, 2006
11,900
37.706
55,354
37.712
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not Applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Stockholders
The annual meeting of stockholders of the Company was held on April 25, 2006. At the annual meeting there were a total number of 12,128,640 shares eligible to vote, of which 10,954,384 were received or cast at the meeting. The result of the vote on the election of directors was as follows:
The following individuals were elected as directors:
FOR
WITHHELD
# of votes
Percentage of shares outstanding
Gordon E. Budke
10,748,776
88.6%
205,608
1.6%
David B. Casper
10,818,720
89.2%
135,664
1.1%
Constance H. Kravas
10,707,286
88.3%
247,098
2.0%
Michael M. Smith
10,748,763
205,621
1.7%
The terms of Directors Jesse G. Foster, D. Michael Jones, Dean W. Mitchell, Brent A. Orrico, Robert D. Adams, Wilber Pribilsky, Edward L. Epstein and Gary Sirmon continued.
Item 5. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibits
3{a}
Articles of Incorporation of Registrant [incorporated by reference to Exhibit B to the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders dated June 10, 1998].
3{b}
Bylaws of Registrant [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 filed with the Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 24, 1998 (File No. 0-26584)].
10{a}
Employment Agreement with Gary L. Sirmon, dated as of January 1, 2004 [incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 0-26584)].
10{b}
Executive Salary Continuation Agreement with Gary L. Sirmon [incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 1996 (File No. 0-26584)].
10{c}
Employment Agreement with Michael K. Larsen [incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 1996 (File No. 0-26584)].
10{d}
Executive Salary Continuation Agreement with Michael K. Larsen [incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 1996 (File No. 0-26584)].
10{e}
1996 Stock Option Plan [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated August 26, 1996 (File No. 333-10819)].
10{f}
1996 Management Recognition and Development Plan [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated August 26, 1996 (File No. 333-10819)].
10{g}
Consultant Agreement with Jesse G. Foster, dated as of December 19, 2003. [incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 0-23584)].
10{h}
Supplemental Retirement Plan as Amended with Jesse G. Foster [incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 1997 (File No. 0-26584)].
10{i}
Towne Bank of Woodinville 1992 Stock Option Plan [incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated April 2, 1998 (File No. 333-49193)].
10{j}
Whatcom State Bank 1991 Stock Option Plan [incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated February 2, 1999 (File No. 333-71625)].
10{k}
Employment Agreement with Lloyd W. Baker [incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 (File No. 0-26584)].
10{l}
Employment Agreement with D. Michael Jones [incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 (File No. 0-26584)].
10{m}
Supplemental Executive Retirement Program Agreement with D. Michael Jones [incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 0-26584)].
10{n}
Form of Supplemental Executive Retirement Program Agreement with Gary Sirmon, Michael K. Larsen, Lloyd W. Baker and Cynthia D. Purcell [incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 (File No. 0-26584)].
10{o}
1998 Stock Option Plan [incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated February 2, 1999 (File No. 333-71625)].
10{p}
2001 Stock Option Plan [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated August 8, 2001 (File No. 333-67168)].
10{q}
Form of Employment Contract entered into with Cynthia D. Purcell, Richard B. Barton, Paul E. Folz, John R. Neill and Douglas M. Bennett [incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 0-26584)].
10{r}
2004 Executive Officer and Director Stock Account Deferred Compensation Plan [incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (File No. 0-26584)].
10{s}
2004 Executive Officer and Director Investment Account Deferred Compensation Plan [incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (File No. 0-26584)].
10{t}
Long-Term Incentive Plan. [Incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed with the Form 8-K on June 19, 2006]
Code of Ethics [incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (File No. 0-26584)].
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certificate of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
35<PAGE> EXHIBIT 31.1CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF BANNER CORPORATIONPURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934 I, D. Michael Jones, certify that: 1.I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Banner Corporation; 2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5.The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. August 8, 2006 /s/D. Michael JonesD. Michael JonesChief Executive Officer<PAGE> EXHIBIT 31.2CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF BANNER CORPORATIONPURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d -14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934 I, Lloyd W. Baker, certify that: 1.I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Banner Corporation; 2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5.The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. August 8, 2006 /s/Lloyd W. BakerLloyd W. BakerChief Financial Officer<PAGE>EXHIBIT 32CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICEROF BANNER CORPORATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, that:*the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and *the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial condition and results of operations as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such report.August 8, 2006/s/D. Michael Jones D. Michael JonesChief Executive Officer August 8, 2006 /s/Lloyd W. Baker Lloyd W. BakerChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF BANNER CORPORATIONPURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934
I, D. Michael Jones, certify that:
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
<PAGE> EXHIBIT 31.2CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF BANNER CORPORATIONPURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d -14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934 I, Lloyd W. Baker, certify that: 1.I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Banner Corporation; 2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5.The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. August 8, 2006 /s/Lloyd W. BakerLloyd W. BakerChief Financial Officer<PAGE>EXHIBIT 32CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICEROF BANNER CORPORATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, that:*the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and *the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial condition and results of operations as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such report.August 8, 2006/s/D. Michael Jones D. Michael JonesChief Executive Officer August 8, 2006 /s/Lloyd W. Baker Lloyd W. BakerChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF BANNER CORPORATIONPURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d -14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934
I, Lloyd W. Baker, certify that:
<PAGE>EXHIBIT 32CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICEROF BANNER CORPORATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, that:*the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and *the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial condition and results of operations as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such report.August 8, 2006/s/D. Michael Jones D. Michael JonesChief Executive Officer August 8, 2006 /s/Lloyd W. Baker Lloyd W. BakerChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICEROF BANNER CORPORATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, that: