As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 27, 2016
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
Commission file number: 001-12568
BBVA BANCO FRANCÉS S.A.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
BBVA FRENCH BANK
(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)
Republic of Argentina
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
Reconquista 199
(C1003ABB) Buenos Aires. Republic of Argentina
(Address of principal executive offices)
Adrián Bressani – 011-54-11-4346-4286 – abressani@bbva.com– Reconquista 281 3° (C1003ABE) Buenos Aires, Republic of Argentina
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Name of each exchange on which registered
* The ordinary shares are not listed for trading, but are listed only in connection with the registration of the American Depositary Shares, pursuant to requirements of the New York Stock Exchange.
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None
The number of outstanding shares of each of the classes of capital or common stock of the registrantas of the close of the period covered by the annual report:
Title of class
Number of shares outstanding
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☒ Yes ☐ No
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. ☐ Yes ☒ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:☒ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ☐Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer ☒ Accelerated filer ☐ Non-accelerated filer ☐
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
U.S. GAAP ☐
Other ☒
If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.
☐ Item 17 ☒ Item 18
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ☐ Yes ☒ No
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 20-F contains words, such as “believe”, “expect”, “estimate”, “intend”, “plan”, “may” and “anticipate” and similar expressions, that identify forward-looking statements, which reflect our views about future events and financial performance. Actual results could differ materially as a result of factors beyond our control, including but not limited to:
Accordingly, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. BBVA Banco Francés S.A. (“BBVA Francés”) undertakes no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements or to publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements. The accompanying information in this annual report, including, without limitation, the information under “Item 4. Information on the Company”,“Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” identifies important factors that could cause material differences between any forward-looking statements and actual results.
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION
General
BBVA Francés is an Argentine bank and maintains its financial books and records in Argentine pesos and prepares its Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with the accounting rules of the Banco Central de la República Argentina (the “Central Bank” or “BCRA”) related thereto (“Argentine Banking GAAP”), which differ in some respects from generally accepted accounting principles in Argentina (see Note 4 to our Consolidated Financial Statements) and the generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). See Note 25 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of the principal differences between Argentine Banking GAAP and U.S. GAAP, as they relate to us, and a reconciliation to U.S. GAAP of net income and total stockholders’ equity. In this annual report, references to “$”, “US$” and “dollars” are to United States dollar and references to “Ps.” or “pesos” are to Argentine pesos. Percentages and certain dollar and peso amounts have been rounded for ease of presentation. Unless otherwise stated, all market share and other industry information has been derived from information published by the Central Bank.
By Communication “A” 3921 of the BCRA and General Resolution No. 441/03 of the National Securities Commissionof Argentina (the “CNV”), in compliance with Decree No. 664/03 of the Federal Executive, application of the restatement method on financial statements in equivalent purchasing power has been suspended as from March 1, 2003.
Argentina’s professional accounting standards require applying Technical Pronouncement No. 6 of the Argentine Federation of Professional Councils in Economic Sciences (F.A.C.P.C.E.) (as amended by Technical Resolution No. 19) which sets forth that financial statements are to be restated in constant currency when the country’s economic environment exhibits certain characteristics. A prerequisite for the application of this pronouncement is that inflation as accumulated throughout a three-year period, measured by the so-called Domestic Wholesale Price Index (the “IPIM”) published by Argentina’s Official Statistics Bureau (the National Statistics and Censuses Institute or “INDEC”) attains or exceeds 100%. As per the latest information released by the INDEC, inflation accumulated in the period from October 31, 2012 to October 31, 2015, measured by the IPIM index was 66%. Therefore, the prerequisite for restatement into constant currency of the information contained in the Consolidated Financial Statements is not satisfied. If this prerequisite were satisfied, the restatement would be mandatory.
Unless otherwise indicated, financial information contained in this annual report reflects the consolidation of the following subsidiaries at and for the fiscal years indicated below:
1
December 31,
2015
2014
2013
On January 7, 2002, Argentina abandoned the peso-dollar parity introduced in April 1991 under Law No. 23,928 (the “Convertibility Law”). Following the initial devaluation and the setting of an official rate exchange at Ps.1.4 per US$1.00, the peso was allowed to float, and as of April 22, 2016 peso traded at approximately Ps.14.4558 per US$1.00. See “Item 3. Key Information—Exchange Rates” for information regarding the evolution of rates of exchange since fiscal year 2011.
CERTAIN TERMS AND CONVENTIONS
The terms below are used as follows throughout this report:
In this report, “$”, “U.S. dollars”, and “dollars” refer to United States Dollars and “Ps” and “peso” refer to the Argentine peso.
2
- PART I -
ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION
The historical financial information set forth below for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 has been selected from, and should be read together with, the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein. The audited financial statements for 2012 and 2011 are not included in this document, but they are included in our annual reports on Form 20-F for the years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, filed by us with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on April 10, 2015 and April 21, 2014, respectively, with retrospective adjustments made for the application of certain changes in accounting principles.
For information concerning the preparation and presentation of the Consolidated Financial Statements, see “Presentation of Financial Information”. See also “D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Argentina”, and “Risk Factors—Risks Related to BBVA Francés” below.
3
2015 (1)
2014 (1)
2013 (1)
4
Declared Dividends
The table below shows the declared dividends paid on each ordinary share and the equivalent of those dividends expressed in terms of dividends per American Depositary Share, each representing three ordinary shares (the “ADSs”), in each case adjusted for all stock dividends during the relevant periods. The Central Bank requires that we maintain 20% of our net income in legal reserves.
5
Declared Dividends Per Ordinary Share (1)
Declared Dividends Per ADS (1)
Ps.(2)
Exchange Rates
The following tables shows the annual high, low, average and period-end exchange rate for US$1.00 for the periods indicated. The exchange rate is calculated by the Central Bank based on the information provided by financial entities on the exchange rate for trading of U.S. dollars for settled transactions in Argentine Pesos and U.S. dollars. Such information must be representative of the prevailing market conditions. After gathering this information, the Central Bank calculates the daily exchange rate using the formula set out in Annex I of Communication “A” 3500.
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York does not report a noon buying rate for pesos.
High (1)
Low (1)
Average (2)
(1) Source: BCRA.
(2) The average of monthly average rates during the period.
The exchange rate on April 22, 2016 was Ps.14.4558 = US$1.00.
Fluctuations in the exchange rate between pesos and dollars affect the dollar equivalent of the peso price of the ordinary shares on the Buenos Aires Stock Exchange (Bolsa de Comercio de Buenos Aires — the “BCBA”) and as a result, would most likely affect the market price of the ADSs. Fluctuations in exchange rates also affect dividend income measured in dollars. The Bank of New York Mellon, as depositary for the ADSs, is required, subject to the terms of the deposit agreement, to convert pesos to dollars at the prevailing exchange rate at the time of making any dividend payments or other distributions. The following table shows the rate of devaluation of the peso vis-à-vis the dollar at year end, the rate of exchange (number of pesos per dollar prevailing in the Argentine foreign exchange market at year end) and the rate of inflation for wholesale price for fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and for the four most recent fiscal years.
6
Since the repeal of the Convertibility Law in January 2002, the peso has devalued approximately 1,345.58% vis-à-vis the dollar.
Risks Relating to Argentina
Overview
We are an Argentine corporation (sociedad anónima), and the vast majority of our operations, properties and customers are located in Argentina. Accordingly, the quality of our assets, our financial condition and our results of operations depend primarily on macroeconomic and political conditions prevailing in Argentina. In 2001, the Argentine economy suffered a severe economic and political crisis (“the Argentine Crisis”) but recovered during Nestor Kirchner’s term as President, which ended in 2007. Kirchner was succeeded by Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, who was reelected for another four-year term on October 23, 2011. On December 10, 2015, Mauricio Macri, leader of the opposition party Cambiemos, was sworn in as the new President of Argentina after defeating Daniel Scioli, the candidate of President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner’s party, in a runoff presidential election. Since assuming office, the new administration (the “Macri Administration”) has announced and implemented several significant economic and policy reforms, which are further described below and which will continue to affect the quality of our assets, our financial condition and our results of operations.
The impact of the recent congressional and presidential elections on the future economic and political environment of Argentina is uncertain, but likely to be material.
Presidential and congressional elections took place in Argentina on October 25, 2015 and a runoff election (ballotage) between the two leading presidential candidates was held on November 22, 2015, which resulted in Mr. Mauricio Macri being elected as the new President of Argentina. The Macri Administration assumed office on December 10, 2015. Since assuming office, the Macri Administration has announced and/or implemented several significant economic and policy reforms, including:
7
It is expected that the new management team of the INDEC appointed by the Macri Administration will implement certain methodological reforms and adjust certain macroeconomic statistics on the basis of such reforms.
It is too early to predict as of the date of this annual report the impact that these measures will have on the Argentine economy and our business. There is uncertainty as to whether the Macri Administration will succeed in implementing all of the measures announced during the Presidential election campaign and as to the timing of their implementation. Even if adopted, such measures may fail to achieve the intended results. Additionally, despite Macri’s victory in the Presidential elections, his party does not have a majority of the seats in Congress, which will require the Macri Administration to seek political support from the opposition for its economic proposals. Further, new unexpected events may develop that create political and/or economic instability in Argentina. The inability of the Macri Administration to implement its agenda as a result of lack of political support or otherwise may weaken confidence in, and otherwise adversely affect, the Argentine economy and its economic and political conditions, which could in turn adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
High inflation rates could negatively affect the Argentine economy in general, including access to the long-term financing market.
High inflation rates have led to the loss of competiveness of Argentine exports in international markets and to a decline in private consumption, causing a negative effect on economic activity and employment. Moreover, high inflation rates have in the past and could in the future undermine confidence in the Argentine financial system, in particular with respect to the peso deposit base,
8
deteriorating the demand for pesos and leading to a portfolio dollarization, which would in turn cause a decrease in the deposit base. This would negatively affect the business volume of banks, including BBVA Francés.
Since 2007, consumer price index (“CPI”) data for the Greater Buenos Aires area (the “CPI-GBA”) and for other Argentine regions/provinces published by the INDEC has not been consistent with CPI data published by private institutions. These inconsistencies created uncertainty regarding the country’s actual inflation rate and made it difficult to anchor inflation expectations. It should be noted that assets, such as public bonds, indexed to the Benchmark Stabilization Ratio (Coeficiente de Estabilización de Referencia or “CER”) are adjusted according to the CPI-GBA. For more information see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospect—Effects of Recent Events on BBVA Francés”.
Argentina’s professional accounting standards require applying Technical Pronouncement No. 6 of the Argentine Federation of Professional Councils in Economic Sciences (FACPCE) (as amended by Technical Resolution No. 19), which sets forth that financial statements are to be restated in constant currency when the country’s economic environment exhibits certain characteristics. A prerequisite for the application of this pronouncement is that inflation as accumulated throughout a three-year period, measured by the so-called Domestic Wholesale Price Index (the “IPIM”) published by the INDEC attains or exceeds 100%. As per the latest information released by the INDEC, inflation accumulated in the period from October 31, 2012 to October 31, 2015 measured by the IPIM index was 66%. Therefore, the prerequisite for restatement into constant currency of the information contained in the consolidated financial statements is not satisfied. If this prerequisite were satisfied, the restatement of the consolidated financial statements in constant currency would be mandatory.
In February 2014, following the imposition by the International Monetary Fund (the “IMF”) of certain requirements to improve the quality of official data, including inflation and GDP data, Argentina began to report a new CPI index (the “CPI NU”), which covers the whole country and uses a new base year (fourth quarter 2013). The CPI NU index was first published in February 2014. The IMF recognized the progress of the Argentine authorities to remedy the inaccurate provision of data, but has delayed the definitive evaluation of the new index. The new index replaces the previous measurement and is used to calculate CER indexation.
The Macri Administration has recognized the previous government’s interference with the INDEC and the unreliability of the data it published. On January 8, 2016, the Macri Administration issued Decree No. 55/2016, declaring the state of administrative emergency related to the national statistical system and the INDEC until December 31, 2016. INDEC has thus ceased publishing statistical information until its technical and administrative structure is reorganized. During this reorganization period, which is expected to last between six and eight months, the INDEC is to use the official CPI figures and other statistics published by the Province of San Luis and the City of Buenos Aires.
Moreover, in February 2016, the Minister of the Economy Alfonso Prat-Gay announced that the IMF will conduct inspections in Argentina pursuant to Section IV of the by-laws of the IMF, which allows officials to conduct inspections with employers and unions in order to make economic recommendations to member countries.
Although the Macri Administration has consistently informed that one of its main goals is to control and reduce of inflation, it remains uncertain as of the date of this annual report whether the reforms described above will be implemented as planned, and whether, even if implemented, will be successful at all. It is also uncertain the extent to which official data will be reviewed and what effect these reforms will have on the Argentine economy or our consolidated financial statements. No assurance can be given as to the reliability of the official data as the INDEC’s data may be materially revised at any time and reveal different historical or prevailing economic conditions and performance from those previously believed, which could in turn affect the credibility of Argentina and its economic and political conditions. All these factors could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
A considerable increase in the government’s expenditure could negatively affect the Argentine economy and its access to international financial markets.
9
Starting in 2005, public expenditures began to increase faster than public revenues and the primary fiscal balance of the national public non-financial sector went from a surplus of 3.2% of GDP in 2004 to a deficit of 5.3% of GDP in 2015. The fiscal deficit deteriorated during 2015, reaching Ps. 225.6 billion as of the year end, which represented a 105.6% increase compared with the 2014 fiscal deficit. The Macri Administration announced gradual adjustments to the fiscal deficit of around 5 percentage points of GDP per year until 2019. Most of the fiscal adjustments are intended to come from the elimination of the subsidies to the energy sector, a measure which is currently being implemented, the reduction of the overall tax burden, the reduction of export duties and the income tax reform announced by the Macri Administration.
Any further deterioration of the government’s fiscal position, however, would negatively affect its ability to access the debt markets and could in turn result in more limited access to such markets by Argentine companies, including BBVA Francés.
Moreover, the former government has started issuing debt in the local Argentine market again after a number of years without it, which Argentine private banks, such as BBVA Francés, often purchase. The Macri Administration has announced that it will continue to issue debt in the local Argentine market and this could lead to increased exposure of private banks, such as BBVA Francés, to the public sector.
It is uncertain whether the Macri Administration will succeed in implementing its strategy to reduce the fiscal deficit and public expenditures, particularly in light of the fact that any measures subject to congressional approval will require support from the opposition. Failure to implement these policies, or if they prove ineffective, could negatively impact consumers’ purchasing power and lead to overall higher prices. Furthermore, the government’s primary fiscal balance could be negatively affected if public expenditures continue to increase in the future. A weaker fiscal position could have a material adverse effect on the government’s ability to obtain long-term financing and adversely affect economic conditions in Argentina, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Holdout creditors who participated in the debt exchange that took place in 2005 and 2010 have filed numerous lawsuits against Argentina in several jurisdictions, including the United States, which have resulted in limitations on the country’s ability to make payments on certain of its outstanding debt and access the international capital markets. It cannot be assured that further litigation against Argentina will not negatively affect its assets or Argentina’s ability to access the international capital markets.
10
In 2005 and 2010, Argentina conducted exchange offers (the “Exchange Offers”) to restructure part of its sovereign debt that had been in default since the end of 2001 (the “Defaulted Debt”). As a result of the Exchange Offers, Argentina restructured over 92% of its eligible Defaulted Debt. Holders of Defaulted Debt who participated in the Exchange Offers (the “Exchange Bondholders”) obtained new bonds with different terms (the “Exchange Bonds”).
Bondholders who did not participate in the Exchange Offers (the “Holdouts”) have obtained favorable rulings in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “District Court”) ordering the payment by Argentina of the principal amount and interest due on their bonds. The District Court held that repaying the Exchange Bondholders but not the Holdouts would violate the pari passu clause of the bonds held by the Holdouts and enjoined Argentina from making any payment on the Exchange Bonds unless similar payments were made to the Holdouts (the “Pari Passu Injunctions”). The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (the “Second Circuit”) upheld the District Court’s rulings on several occasions and ordered Argentina to pay US$1.3 billion plus post-judgment interest to the Holdouts. The Second Circuit stayed its decision pending Argentina’s appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court (the “Supreme Court”). On June 16, 2014 the Supreme Court declined to review the Second Circuit’s decision and the stay was lifted shortly thereafter.
By denying Argentina’s petition for review, the Supreme Court upheld the Second Circuit’s decision ordering Argentina to pay US$1.3 billion to the Holdouts. While the Argentine government has repeatedly stated its intention to pay the full amount only to the Exchange Bondholders, any potential payment to the Exchange Bondholders not accompanied by a similar payment to the Holdouts could be blocked based on the decision of the Second Circuit. On June 30, 2014, the deadline for the payment of interest installments on certain Exchange Bonds expired. The government transferred the necessary funds to the trustee, the Bank of New York Mellon, to make the payment, but the funds were blocked by the District Court. On July 30, 2014, the grace period expired for payment of said interest installments and the payments had not yet been cleared. On September 11, 2014, the Argentine government passed Law 26,984 (the “Sovereign Payment Law”) replacing Bank of New York Mellon with a local Argentine bank, Nación Fideicomisos S.A. in the city of Buenos Aires, as trustee. With this law the government sought to create a new voluntary exchange of restructured debt. Furthermore, in August 2014, the Central Bank revoked the license of the Bank of New York Mellon to act in Argentina. On September 29, 2014, the District Court held Argentina in contempt, due to its attempts to make payments to the Exchange Bondholders but not to the Holdouts, in defiance of the District Court’s orders.
In February 2016, the Macri Administration announced initial agreements with several groups of Holdouts and made a settlement proposal to all other Holdouts, including those with pending claims in U.S. courts. In turn, in March 2, 2016, the District Court ordered the Pari Passu Injunctions, including the so-called “me too injunctions” (injunctions carried out by other creditors which were not included in the original Holdouts’ claim) to be automatically vacated once (i) Argentina repeals Law No. 26,017 issued during Fernández de Kirchner Administration under which the government would not make payments to Holdouts and also repeals the Sovereign Payment Law, and (ii) Argentina pays in full the parties who have entered into settlement agreements on or before February 29, 2016 (the “March 2 Order”). On March 31, 2016, Congress approved the so-called Debt Authorization Law repealing the legislative obstacles to settle claims with Holdouts and approving the settlement proposal. The Court of Appeals affirmed the March 2 Order and instructed the District Court to monitor and confirm that the actual payment to the Holdouts takes place under the terms of the relevant agreements.
On April, 22, 2016, Argentina began the process of tranferring the funds for the payment to the holdouts in order to terminate the default situation of 2001 and the 15-year trail. The payment was split between US$6,200 million to be paid directly by a transfer of funds for those holdouts who signed an agreement with the Macri Administration before February 29, 2016 and another US$3.1 billion to be transfered to a trust in the Bank of New York for those who reached an agreement to after that date. After these payments, Judge Thomas Griesa decided to lift the precautionary measures.
Not all creditors have agreed to settle on the Macri Administration´s proposed terms and other holders of untendered debt who have not yet agreed to the settlement proposal of the Macri Adminsitration litigation continue in the United States and other jurisdictions, and the consequences of potentially inconsistent rulings from different courts are unclear. As a result of this continuing and potential future litigation, it cannot be assure that further judgements, injuctions or attachments orders could not lead to the freezing or attachment of some of Argentina’s assets, which could have a material adverse effect on the Argentine economy and affect our ability to access international financing or pay our debts.
The Argentine economy remains vulnerable to external events that could be caused by significant economic difficulties of Argentina’s major regional trading partners or by more general “contagion” effects, which could have a material adverse effect on Argentina’s economic growth and its ability to service its public debt.
Weak, flat or negative economic growth of any of Argentina’s major trading partners, such as Brazil, could adversely affect Argentina’s balance of trade and, consequently, Argentina’s economic growth. Brazil is currently Argentina’s largest export market. The Brazilian GDP decreased by 3.8 % during 2015, mainly due to a 8.3% decrease in industrial production. In addition, the Brazilian
11
real depreciated by 33% against the U.S. dollar over the course of 2015, according to the Brazilian institute of geography and statistics (Instituto Brasilero de Geografía y Estadística, IBGE).
Moreover, Brazil is currently undergoing an internal political crisis as its congress initiated an impeachment process against the current President Dilma Russeff, who faces charges of manipulating the budget deficit and attempt to obstruct an investigation of a potential multibillion-dollar bribery scheme at Petrobras, the state-controlled oil giant.
The Argentine economy may also be affected by “contagion” effects. International investors’ reactions to events occurring in one developing country sometimes appear to follow a “contagion” pattern resulting in an entire region or investment class being disfavored by international investors. In the past, the Argentine economy has been adversely affected by such contagion effects on a number of occasions, including the 1994 Mexican financial crisis, the 1997 Asian financial crisis, the 1998 Russian financial crisis, the 1999 devaluation of the Brazilian real, the 2001 collapse of Turkey’s fixed exchange rate regime and the global financial crisis that began in 2008.
The Argentine economy may also be affected by conditions in developed economies, such as the United States, that are significant trading partners of Argentina or have influence over world economic cycles. For example, if interest rates increase significantly in developed economies, including the United States, Argentina and its trading partners, such as Brazil and other developing economies, could find it more difficult and expensive to borrow capital and refinance existing debt, which could adversely affect economic growth in those countries.
Any of these factors could adversely affect Argentine economic growth. As an Argentine bank, any of these factors would in turn adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
A decline in international prices for Argentina’s principal commodity exports could have a material adverse effect on Argentina’s economy and public finances.
Commodities markets have historically been characterized by high volatility. Despite the volatility of prices of most of Argentina’s commodities exports, commodities have significantly contributed to the government’s revenues during recent years. Consequently, the Argentine economy has remained relatively dependent on the price of its main agricultural exports, primarily soy. This dependence has, in turn, rendered the Argentine economy more vulnerable to fluctuations in commodity prices. A decline in commodity prices may adversely affect the Argentine economy, as well as its public finances due to a decrease in government revenue from export taxes. As of the date of this annual report, the Macri Administration has eliminated export taxes on many agricultural products and reduced the export taxes on soy from 35% to 30%. Any reduction in commodity prices or further reduction of export taxes could negatively impact Argentina’s public finances, which could in turn adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The relatively low level of international reserves could lead to further depreciation of the peso if there is an abrupt increase in foreign currency demand by the public in the new floating exchange rate system.
12
The level of international reserves of the Central Bank has increased by more than 4 billion dollars since the Macri Administration took office even though there has been virtually no Central Bank intervention in the foreign exchange market since the removal of certain foreign exchange restrictions. The Central Bank is now committed to a policy of floating exchange rates in order to deviate from the devaluation-inflation dynamics that have affected the Argentine economy in recent years. During the first 100 days in office of the Macri Administration, the Central Bank obtained a loan of US$5 billion from a group of seven international banks in order to strengthen its international reserves.
For the same purpose, during December 2015, the Central Bank also converted Chinese Yuans into U.S. dollar in an amount of US$3 billion under the terms of the swap currency agreement with China. This currency swap was originally made for the equivalent of US$11 billion and, although the funds were recorded on the Central Bank’s balance sheet, they were not considered as available liquidity. The swap agreement already contemplated the possibility of the conversion of Chinese Yuans into U.S. dollars at a cost and the fact that the IMF officially accepted the Yuan as a reserve currency further facilitated the transaction. The current stock of international reserves held by the Central Bank subtracting the currency swap with China and the US$5 billion loan with international banks is relatively low, which would reduce the capacity of the Central Bank to endure a hypothetical increase in demand of foreign currency.
Moreover, because of the final agreement reached with the Holdouts, the Central Bank received US$7,200 million to be added to reserves due to the oversubscription of the debt issued to pay the holdouts and exit the default.
A low level of international reserves could lead to a further depreciation of the peso, if there is an abrupt increase in foreign currency demand, which could in turn adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Risks Relating to the Argentine Financial System and to BBVA Francés
The short-term structure of the deposit base of the Argentine financial system, including the deposit base of the Bank, could lead to a reduction in liquidity levels and limit the long-term expansion of financial intermediation.
After the Argentine Crisis, the volume of financial activity regarding deposits and loans was severely reduced. Between 2003 and 2007, a gradual and increasing recovery of deposit levels took place. As a result of the global financial crisis, deposit levels decreased again during 2008 until the last semester of 2009 but they have been increasing since then.
The growth of the Argentine financial system is heavily dependent on deposit levels because of the small size of the Argentine capital markets and the lack of access to foreign capital markets in recent years. In the medium term, the growth of credit will likely depend on the growth of deposit levels. During the 2011-2013 period, credit grew at a higher rate than deposits, thereby consuming excess liquidity of financial institutions. In 2014, this scenario started to change, and deposits started to grow at a higher rate than credit.
The liquidity of the Argentine financial system at the present date is relatively high due to the high level of mandatory deposit reserves applicable to Argentine financial entities, among other short-term investments, such as repurchase transaction with the Central Bank. These liquid assets account for approximately 20% of the total deposits of the Argentine financial entities as of December 31, 2015. Banks can also invest in short-term Central Bank bills (Lebac) which also increase the liquidity ratios of the financial system.
Notwithstanding that, because most deposits are short-term deposits, a substantial part of loans must also have short-term maturities to match the terms of the deposits. The proportion of long-term credit lines, such as mortgages, is small.
Although we believe that deposit liquidity levels are currently reasonable, no assurance can be given that those levels will not be reduced due to future negative economic conditions or otherwise. If depositors lose confidence as a result of negative economic conditions or otherwise and withdraw significant funds from the banks, there will be a substantial negative impact on the manner in which financial institutions, including us, conduct their business and on their and our ability to operate as financial intermediaries. If Argentine financial institutions, such as BBVA Francés, are unable to access adequate sources of medium and long-term funding or if they are required to pay high costs in order to obtain the same and/or if they cannot generate profits and/or maintain their current volume and/or scale of their business, whether due to a decline in deposits or otherwise, our liquidity position and ability to honor our debts as they come due may be adversely affected.
The instability of the regulatory framework, in particular the regulatory framework affecting financial institutions, could have a material adverse effect on financial institutions such as the Bank.
13
During Cristina Kirchner’s second term as President a series of new regulations were issued affecting financial institutions, mainly regulating the foreign exchange market and imposing new capital requirements for financial institutions. In this regard, Communications “A” 5272 and 5273 of the Central Bank, dated February 1, 2012, increased the capital requirements for financial institutions carrying out activities in Argentina. These Communications required certain minimum capital levels in order to support operational risks and the distribution of dividends, and an additional capital buffer equivalent to 75% of the total capital requirements. The Central Bank stated that these new requirements were based on the credit risk measure required by Basel II. For more information regarding capital requirements for Argentine banks please see “Item 4. Information on the Company—F. The Argentine Banking System”. Moreover, a new law was approved by the Congress introducing amendments to the Central Bank’s charter. The principal issues addressed by this bill were the use of Central Bank’s reserves for the cancellation of public debt together with the implementation of polices by the Central Bank in order to interfere in the determination of interest rates and terms of loans to financial institutions.
The Central Bank issued Communications “A” 5319 and “A” 5380, dated July 5, 2012 and December 21, 2012, respectively, and Communication “A” 5516, dated December 27, 2013, making it mandatory for banks to provide credit lines for productive purposes. The government’s intention was to increase investments, although an increase in the demand for these loans could in turn lower the demand for other types of loans. BBVA Francés used approximately Ps.6,691 million in 2015 for these types of loans.
On November 29, 2012, the Argentine Congress passed the new “Securities Law”, which modified the public offer regime set forth by Law No. 17,811, as amended. One of the most significant amendments introduced by the Securities Law referred to the powers of the CNV. The adoption of Section 20 of the Securities Law raised concern in the market, especially among listed companies, since it entitles the CNV to (i) appoint supervisors with veto power over the resolutions adopted by the board of directors of listed companies and (ii) disqualify the board of directors of listed companies for a period of 180 days when, as determined by the CNV, the interests of the minority shareholders and/or security holders are adversely affected.
On October 1, 2013, the Central Bank issued Communication “A” 5460, granting broad protections to consumers of financial services, including, among other aspects, the regulation of fees and commissions charged by financial institutions for their services. As a result, fees and charges must represent a real, direct and demonstrable cost and should have technical and economic justification. Communication “A” 5514 introduced an exception to the application of Communication “A” 5460 for certain credit agreements that have pledges as collateral and are entered into before September 30, 2019.
On December 23, 2014, the Central Bank amended Communication “A” 5460 through Communication “A” 5685. As a result of this amendment, any increase in commissions for new products or services for retail customers must have the prior authorization of the Central Bank.
Additionally, according to Central Bank Communication “A” 5689, dated January 8, 2015, financial entities must deduct from the potential dividend distributable amount any fine imposed by the Central Bank, the CNV and the Unidad de Información Financiera (the Argentine anti-money laundering agency, “UIF”).
While the Macri Administration has repealed part of the regulatory framework enacted by the Fernández de Kirchner Administration, such as (i) the restrictions on the foreign exchange market, (ii) the regulations concerning minimum and maximum interest rates on certain loans and deposits, (iii) the requirements governing the flow of capital into Argentina, (iv) the percentage of foreign currency positions of financial entites, (v) the monthly contributions that banks must set aside each month to fund the deposit gurantee fund, (vi) and additional capital requieremnts, it is still early to know whether the new regulatory framework will be stable and the impact that the new regulatory framework may have on the Bank’s business. The absence of a stable regulatory framework or a new regulations that may affect the banks business could limit the ability of financial institutions, including BBVA Francés, to make long-term decisions, such as asset-allocation decisions, and that could cause uncertainty with respect to our future business, results of operations and financial condition. We cannot assure that laws and regulations currently governing the financial sector will not continue to change in the future or that any changes will not adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Argentine corporate disclosure, governance and accounting standards may require the Bank to provide different information than would be required under U.S. standards. This difference could influence foreign investors’ decisions to invest in Argentine securities and could therefore limit the Bank’s access to international markets.
The securities laws of Argentina that govern publicly-listed companies such as the Bank impose disclosure requirements that are more limited than those in the United States. The Argentine securities markets are not as highly regulated and supervised as the U.S.
14
securities markets. There are also important differences between accounting and financial reporting standards applicable to financial institutions in Argentina and those in the United States. As a result, financial statements and reported earnings of Argentine financial institutions generally differ from those reported based on U.S. accounting and reporting standards. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—U.S. and Argentine Banking GAAP Reconciliation” for a description of the principal differences between Argentine banking GAAP and U.S. GAAP and how they affect our financial statements and the reconciliation to U.S. GAAP of net income and total stockholders’ equity for the periods ended and as of the dates therein indicated.
Accordingly, the information available about the Bank will not be the same as the information available about a U.S. company. The difference in the disclosure requirements between Argentine corporate governance and accounting standards and U.S. GAAP could limit foreign investors’ ability to evaluate our business, results of operations and financial condition, and influence foreign investors’ decisions whether to invest in Argentine securities, thereby limiting the Bank’s access to international financial markets.
Lawsuits brought against us outside Argentina, the enforcement of foreign judgments and complaints based on foreign legal concepts may be unsuccessful.
We are a commercial bank organized under the laws of Argentina. Most of our shareholders, directors, members of the supervisory committee and officers and certain experts named herein reside outside the United States (principally in Argentina). Substantially all of our assets are located outside the United States. If any shareholder were to bring a lawsuit against our directors, officers or experts in the United States, it may be difficult for them to effect service of legal process within the United States upon these persons or to enforce in Argentina a judgment against them obtained in the courts of the United States based upon the civil liability provisions of the United States federal securities laws, due to specific requirements of Argentine law regarding procedural law issues and principles of public policy.
Because we are a financial institution, any insolvency proceeding against us would be subject to the powers of, and intervention by, the Central Bank, which may limit remedies otherwise available and extend the duration of the proceedings.
Under Argentine law, the liquidation and commencement of bankruptcy proceedings against financial institutions, until their banking license has been revoked by the Central Bank, may only be commenced by the Central Bank. If BBVA Francés were unable to pay its debts as they come due, the Central Bank could intervene and revoke its banking license, and file a bankruptcy petition before a commercial court. If the Central Bank intervenes, the reorganization proceeding could take longer and it is likely that the shareholders’ remedies would be restricted. During any such process, the Central Bank would have to consider its interests as a regulator and could well prioritize the claims of other creditors and third parties against the Bank. As a result of any such intervention, shareholders may realize substantially less on the claims than they would in a bankruptcy proceeding of a non-financial institution in Argentina or a financial institution or non-financial institution in the United States or any other country.
The special rules that govern the priority of different stakeholders of financial institutions in Argentina, which give priority to depositors with respect to most other creditors, may negatively affect other stakeholders in case of judicial liquidation or bankruptcy of the Bank.
Argentine Law No. 24,485, in force since April 18, 1995 and as amended by Law No. 25,089, provides that in case of judicial liquidation or bankruptcy of a financial institution such as the Bank, all depositors, irrespective of the type, amount or currency of their deposits, will have general and absolute preferential rights with respect to all other creditors, except for certain labor credits and credits secured with a pledge or mortgage, to be paid with 100% of the funds deriving from the liquidation of the Bank’s assets. In addition, depositors of any kind of deposits have special preferential rights over the remaining creditors of the Bank, except for certain labor credits, to be paid with (i) any of the Bank’s funds which may be held by the Central Bank as total reserves, (ii) any remaining funds of the Bank in existence as of the date on which the Bank’s license is revoked, or (iii) any funds derived from the compulsory transfer of certain assets of the Bank according to instructions of the Central Bank, in the following order of priority: (a) deposits made by legal entities up to Ps.5,000 per entity, or its equivalent in foreign currency, (b) deposits for terms exceeding 90 days and (c) all other deposits on a pro rata basis.
In case of a judicial liquidation or bankruptcy of a financial institution such as the Bank, shareholders may not be able to partially or completely recover their investment due to the priority imposed by law.
Volatility of credit ratings in Argentina could affect the volatility of the Bank’s credit ratings, and therefore limit the Bank’s access to international financial markets.
The Bank’s credit ratings are based on Argentina's sovereign rating, which has fluctuated considerably since the Argentine Crisis. As a result, the Bank’s ratings have also fluctuated in this period, although they have tended to be higher than the sovereign
15
rating. These fluctuations impact our costs of funding, our collateral obligations and our ability to access international markets. Although Argentina is not longer in default following the final agreement with Holdouts, continued volatility of, or a decrease in, Argentina’s sovereign rating could limit our access to financing or make such financing more expensive for us, even if available, which could in turn adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Factors Related to BBVA Francés’ Subsidiaries
As a consequence of the social security reform and the consequent loss of corporate purpose and liquidation of our subsidiary Consolidar AFJP S.A., labor lawsuits were filed against it claiming certain payments. Adverse rulings against Consolidar AFJP in such lawsuits could result in severance payment obligations in significant amounts, which could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of Consolidar AFJP.
Consolidar AFJP S.A. (“Consolidar AFJP” or “AFJP”) was a privately-owned pension fund managing company whose purpose was the administration of retirement contributions from affiliates and the corresponding payment of senior, disability and widow’s pensions. On December 4, 2008, the Federal government enacted Law No. 26,425 to implement a social security reform, by which the government assumed any liabilities of the pension fund arising from retirement, disability and death.
On December 7, 2010, Consolidar AFJP filed a claim against the Federal government and the Ministry of Labor and Social Security, requesting compensation for the losses suffered by the company and its shareholders, as a result of the aforementioned social security reform.
Moreover, as a consequence of the social security reform and the consequent loss of its corporate business purpose, at an extraordinary shareholder meeting held on December 28, 2009, the AFJP shareholders, decided to terminate the corporate existence of the company and liquidate it. As of the present date, the liquidation process is still ongoing.
During 2015, 10 labor legal actions were filed against AFJP claiming differences in severance payment amounts. The differences in amounts are immaterial and include wage differences, overtime payments, and payment of additional commissions. AFJP has estimated this contingency and recorded the corresponding allowances it believes are appropriate. Adverse rulings against Consolidar AFJP could result in severance payments by the company in significant amounts, which could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the company. If AFJP were to have insufficient funds to cancel all of its debt obligations and consummate the liquidation process, AFJP’s creditors could have in certain circumstances recourse to BBVA Francés, as BBVA Francés holds a 53.89% equity interest in AFJP.
ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
RECENT POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS IN ARGENTINA
Macroeconomic Environment
Argentina held presidential and legislative elections in October 2015. Daniel Scioli, candidate of the governing party, Frente para la Victoria (“FPV”), received 36.8% of the votes, followed by Mauricio Macri, of the opposition coalition Cambiemos, with 34.3%. Argentina’s election system establishes that a candidate must win more than 50% of the vote or obtain least a 10% advantage over his immediate follower in order to be declared as winner in the first round of voting. Given these results, a runoff election took place in November between. Mr. Scioli and Mr. Macri, which Mr. Macri won with 51.4% of the votes. On December 10, 2015 Cambiemos took over after 12 years of FPV government.
The Macri Administration has recognized the previous government’s interference with the INDEC and the unreliability of the data it published. On January 8, 2016, the Macri Administration issued Decree No. 55/2016, declaring the state of administrative emergency related to the national statistical system and the INDEC until December 31, 2016. INDEC thus ceased publishing statistical information until its technical and administrative structure is reorganized. During this reorganization period, which is expected to last between six and eight months, the INDEC is to use the official CPI figures and other statistics published by the Province of San Luis and the City of Buenos Aires..
INDEC published revised GDP figures for 2015 on March 30, 2016. According to this, Argentine GDP at constant prices grew 2.1% in 2015 with respect to 2014.
With respect to the labor market, the latest published information is for the third quarter of 2015, and reflected a decrease in the unemployment rate to 5.9% from 7.5% in the third quarter of 2014. Salaries, according to an average Salary index including both
16
private and public sector wages compiled by INDEC, rose 30.1% between October 2014 and October 2015. Salaries for workers in the private sector (excluding the underground economy) and for public employees increased 28.1% and 32.8%, respectively, during that period.
Since January 2014 the INDEC publishes a new price index, the so-called National and Urban Consumer Price Index (IPC-NU), which has tended to measure price variations below those recorded by other provincial and private indices For the first ten months of 2015 inflation measured by the IPC-NU was 11.9%, and annual inflation was 14.3% by that measure. By contrast, the IPCBA (a price index compiled by the Statistical Office of the Government of the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires) recorded an accumulated inflation of 19.8% (23.8% year-to-year) for the same period. Publication of the IPC-NU has also been suspended since October 2015. Using the IPCBA figures, as suggested by the new INDEC officials, to calculate the CER coefficient, which is used to adjust inflation-indexed instruments, inflation reached 26.9% between December 2014 and December 2015.
During 2015, an expansive fiscal policy remained in place. The primary fiscal deficit was Ps.104.797 billion, compared to Ps.38.562 billion in 2014, an increase of 171.8%. This resulted from the fact that primary spending rose by 34.5%, while total revenues rose by a 29.3% rate year-to-year during the same period.
With respect to specific expense items, social security benefits increased by 47.4% year over year, followed by a 39% increase in wage expenses and a 50.6% increase in transfers to the provinces. All these items grew well above the primary spending average rate for the year. By contrast, transfers to the private sector (+31.5%) and capital expenses (+22.5%) grew at below-average rates.
On the income side, during 2015 social security revenue (+39.4%) was the main contributor to overall revenue growth. Tax revenue grew at a slower rate (25.8% during the period), mainly because of a decrease in the collection of export duties. After interest, the national government recorded a deficit of Ps.225.637 billion, 105.6% higher than the 2014 deficit.
Total tax revenue increased by 31.5% year on year in 2015 with income tax revenue increasing by 42.8%. Revenue from export duties decreased 9.7% because of lower agricultural commodity prices.VAT revenue was up by 30.8%, while revenue from Social Security taxes increased by 34.8% year-to-year in 2015.
There was a strong foreign trade contraction in 2015. The trade balance fell to a deficit of US$3,038 million compared to a US$3,107 million surplus in 2014. On the exports side, this decline was the result of stagnant volumes and a significant slump in prices, especially for agricultural commodities. The value of exports in 2015 reached US$56,751 million, a contraction of 16.9% compared to 2014, while total imports fell by 8.3% to US$59,789 million.
On December 17, 2015 the new government announced the elimination of all restrictions imposed on the access of agents to the foreign exchange market, the so-called “Cepo” (“Foreign-Exchange Clamp”), which had been implemented in October 2011. The Peso was subject to an average devaluation of around 1.1% per month between January and November 2015. In December, in line with the elimination of those restrictions and the normalization of the exchange rate market, the Argentine Peso experienced a devaluation of 34% The official exchange rate reached 13.005 Ps./US$ at the end of the month, an accumulated 52.6% increase in the price of the dollar in pesos for the year, with an average rate in December of 11.45 Ps./US$, 33.9% higher than the average of 8.55 Ps./US$ in December 2014.
During the enforcement of the “Foreign-Exchange Clamp” in 2015, US$6,720 million dollars were sold to the public for “portfolio dollarization” purposes, out of total net sales of US$7,531 million by the BCRA during the whole year. On the income side, the main items were export settlements for US$23,834 million plus US$11,000 million from a swap transaction with the Popular Bank of China. Of these, an equivalent of US$3.0 billion yuans were converted into dollars after the lifting of the foreign exchange restrictions to increase liquid reserves. At December 31, 2015 there were international reserves of US$25,563 million, a decrease of US$5,879 million with respect to the end of 2014.
Monetary Policy
Monetary policy was strongly expansive in 2015. The year recorded an increase of Ps.161.365 billion in the monetary base, a 40.5% increase over the previous year (almost double the 22.5% rate recorded in 2014). The main source of expansion was the financing of the public sector, amounting to Ps.177.926 billion (a 10.2% increase over the Ps.161.508 billion of 2014), followed by monetary expansion which originated in the cancellation of foreign exchange futures contracts (some Ps.30 billion) signed by the
17
previous administration. This monetary expansion was partially compensated by net sales by the Central Bank in the foreign-exchange market in order to support the peso, amounting to Ps.71.822 billion or the equivalent of USD 7,530 million. The M2 monetary aggregate, which includes currency held by the public, checking accounts and savings accounts, increased 28.0% year over year in 2015 and 28.9% in 2014.
The private banks’ Badlar interest rate (the rate paid by private banks on 30-35 day term deposits over 1 million pesos) expressed in monthly averages, showed an upward trend, going from 19.98% in December 2014 to a year-high of 27.54% in December 2015. That figure was significantly influenced by the adjustment of interest rates on BCRA short-term bills used to absorb excess liquidity (“Lebacs”), which reached a record 38% in mid-December, 2015. The hike was implemented in order to increase the appeal of holding positions in local currency and to contain the depreciation of the Peso after the normalization of the foreign exchange market mentioned above.
Total deposits in the financial system increased by 37.9% in 2015. The public sector increased its deposits by 11% year on year, while private sector deposits recorded increases of 40,7% for deposits in pesos and 116.4% for deposits in dollars (42.3% if measured in dollars) mainly due to the effects of the December devaluation.
The stock of loans in pesos granted to the non-financial private sector increased by 36.9% during 2015, with credit card loans playing a leading role with a 54.1% increase. An analysis of the financial system’s credit allocation by currency reveals the private agents’ perception of an impending devaluation, as loans in dollars fell by 9.8% compared to 2014.
It is worth mentioning that after the Macri Administration took office, both the President and several members of the Board of Directors of the BCRA resigned and new officials were appointed. Also, a series of financial system regulations were modified as explained above.
A. HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY
BBVA Francés (the Bank), an Argentine corporation (a “sociedad anónima” or “S.A.”), was duly incorporated under the name Banco Francés del Río de la Plata S.A. on October 14, 1886. The Bank has registered its office in Reconquista 199, C1003ABB, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina; telephone number 54-11-4346-4000. The Bank’s agent in the United States for U.S. federal securities law purposes is CT Corporation System, currently with offices at 111 Eighth Avenue, New York, New York 10011.
BBVA Francés original by-laws (“Estatutos”) were approved on November 20, 1886, by a decree recorded in the Public Registry of Commerce of Buenos Aires City on December 6, 1886, under No. 1,065 on Folio 359, Book 5, Volume “A” of National By-laws. The by-laws, including all amendments introduced to this date, were recorded in the Public Registry of Commerce (the governmental regulatory agency of corporations). The last amendment was recorded on March 8, 2011, under No. 3,930 Book 62 of Corporations (“sociedades anónimas”). Pursuant to its current corporate by-laws, the Bank will terminate its activities on December 31, 2080, unless this term is extended by the shareholders.
The Bank is supervised by the Central Bank of Argentina, an entity that establishes valuation and accounting criteria, the rules on liquidity and capital requirements as well as the reporting systems of Argentine financial institutions. It is also subject to inspections by the Central Bank, based on which it is assigned a “rating”. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—The Argentine Banking System and its Regulatory Framework”.
Since 1886, the Bank has been recognized as a leading provider of financial services to large corporations. In the early 1980s, it broadened its customer base to include SMEs as well as individual customers. In response to demands from the corporate market and following the structural changes brought about by the stabilization process in Argentina, since 1991, the Bank added to its traditional commercial banking products a full range of services, such as investment banking, capital market transactions and international banking.
In the 1980s and 1990s, in order to achieve a wider market penetration, it expanded its distribution network by opening branches throughout Argentina.
In December 1996, when BBVA became the principal shareholder, the Bank reaffirmed its universal banking strategy with the goal of increasing the most profitable business segment: medium- and low-income individuals and SMEs in the middle market.
To this end, in August 1997, 71.75% of Banco de Crédito Argentino (the “Crédito acquisition”) was acquired, a retail bank focused on the middle market and consumer banking sectors. This merger allowed it to maximize the strengths of each bank and to implement an ambitious leadership plan that included an expansion plan, starting with a strong initial positioning in each market.
18
To effect the merger, BBVA Francés issued 14,174,432 ordinary shares to the existing shareholders of Banco de Crédito through a capital increase. On March 5, 1998 the Public Registry of Commerce registered the merger as well as the change in the name of the company from Banco Francés del Río de la Plata S.A. to Banco Francés S.A.
At the ordinary and extraordinary shareholders’ meeting held on April 27, 2000, a resolution was passed to change our name to BBVA Francés S.A. On October 4, 2000, the Public Registry of Commerce registered our change from Banco Francés S.A. to BBVA Francés S.A., and the amendment to our by-laws were made reflects the name change.
In the early 2000’s the Argentine Crisis and the ensuing economic and political instability led to a deep contraction in the intermediation volumes. In response, the Bank changed its short-term commercial strategy towards the transactional business, adjusted its operating structure and implemented a strict cost control plan. Actions were also focused on recovering asset quality levels, which had been strongly affected by the Argentine Crisis. By mid-2003, the economy began to recover and it returned to offering the full range of financial services, including credit facilities, albeit restricted to short-term financing. Commencing in 2004, it gradually strengthened its credit activity in the midst of economic solvency, and consolidated its transactional business. During last years, the Bank focused mainly in the most profitable segments, retail and small and medium size companies, maintaining the leadership in the large corporations business.
19
On February 9, 2012, the board of directors of BBVA Francés and Inversora Otar S.A. approved the merger between both companies and on March 26, 2012, the Shareholders Meetings of both companies approved the transaction. On July 18, 2013, the Argentine Central Bank authorized the merger by Resolution No. 473 and on August 8, 2013 the National Securities Commission (Comisión Nacional de Valores) approved it by Resolution No. 17,155. On March 27, 2014, it was registered with the Superintendence of Corporations under No. 5,302, Book 68 of Corporations.
On March 26, 2014, BBVA Francés cancelled 50,410,182 ordinary shares and issued simultaneously 50,410,182 ordinary shares of BBVA Francés, to be delivered in exchange to the former owners of Inversora Otar (BBV América S.L., Corporación General Financiera S.A. and Sucesión Romero) pursuant to the exchange ratio duly approved. As a result of this transaction as of December 31, 2014, the shareholders of Inversora Otar S.A. have the following ownership on BBVA Frances: BBV América S.L. 29.81%, Corporación General Financiera S.A. 0.47% and Sucesión Romero 0.0041%.
Because of this simultaneous increase and cancellation of the shares, the total amount of the corporate capital of the Bank remained unchanged. On April 1, 2012, as a result of the merger between BBVA Francés and Inversora Otar S.A., BBVA Francés acquired all the shares of BBVA Francés Valores Sociedad de Bolsa S.A. previously held by Inversora Otar S.A., becoming its sole shareholder. On June 29, 2012, BBVA Francés S.A. sold a 3.0047% interest in BBVA Francés Valores Sociedad de Bolsa S.A. to BBV America SL for Ps.441,194.
On July 10, 2013, BBVA Francés and Consultatio S.A. signed a sale and purchase agreement, under which the Bank acquired 23 of the 33 floors of the building under construction by Consultatio S.A., which will became the “BBVA Tower”. This is the largest corporate headquarters real estate development project in the country and is part of the plan designed in 2010 by BBVA Francés to unify its core areas, currently divided among 10 buildings in the City of Buenos Aires. The goal is to have a building with the highest construction and environmental standards that will allow the Bank’s staff to work together in the same area, thus achieving greater efficiency. It is worth noting the building is being developed according to the highest international environmental and sustainability standards and with the commitment of the BBVA Group of preserving the environment. The investment of approximately Ps.1,200 million has a payment schedule associated with the work progress of the project. To date, construction is progressing according to plan and projected for completion in 2016.
BBVA Frances considers the high income segment as strategic and for that reason the Bank has been working over the past two years on a long term plan in order to achieve a leading and differentiated position in this target. Accordingly, by the end of November 2013, the Bank launched the PREMIUM segment with an exclusive event at the Greek embassy in Argentina. This new segment is composed of the 15,000 clients with the highest income, who will have access to a new and different service experience: “Premium” executives, parking at branches with VIP spaces, free of charge subscriptions to magazines and newspapers, birthday presents and many other premium experiences at theatres, concerts and movies, with pre-sales on tickets and priority in invitations and exclusive brochures, among others.
In September 2014, BBVA Francés created the new Digital and Transformation Banking Division, following the guidelines of the BBVA Group. The new division was created in order to develop more convenient and relevant products for its customers and to pursue more dynamic business, employing increasingly innovative communication channels. Furthermore, BBVA Francés implemented some organizational changes, redefining roles and simplifying the organizational chart, in order to adapt the Bank’s internal structure to its business needs.
On May 20, 2015, BBVA Francés executed a Share Purchase Agreement with the Volkswagen Group for the acquisition of 51% of the issued and outstanding capital stock and voting rights of the Volkswagen Credit Compañía Financiera S.A., representing 23,970,000 registered, non-endorsable shares of common stock, par value Ps.1. This transaction is subject to the prior approval of the Central Bank of Argentina. According to the terms and conditions of the agreement, the maximum amount to be paid for the shares is Ps.53,040,000, which will be paid by the Bank at the closing of the transaction.
In May 2015, BBVA Francés.’s Board of Directors accepted the resignation of Ricardo Enrique Moreno as Executive Director (CEO), and appointed Martin Ezequiel Zarich to fill this position. The Board also decided that the resignation of Mr. Moreno shall be effective when the Central Bank of Argentina authorizes Mr. Zarich as the new Executive Director (CEO). Finally, our Board has also decided to appoint Gustavo Alonso as the new Director of Innovation & Development, replacing Mr. Zarich.
On June 30, 2015, the Board of BBVA Francés decided to carry out some changes in the Senior Management. The Board accepted the resignation of Mr. Juan Eugenio Rogero González as Risk Director and appointed Mr. Gerardo Fiandrino for this position.
20
On January 11, 2016 Mr. Martin Ezequiel Zarich was appointed Chief Executive Officer (CEO) after BCRA issued the corresponding authorization through Resolution No. 9.
B. BUSINESS OVERVIEW
BBVA Francés has all its operations, property and customers located in Argentina. The Bank has traditionally accepted deposits and granted loans in pesos and in certain other currencies, primarily in U.S. dollars. Following the Argentine Crisis, U.S. dollar deposits were limited to granting U.S. dollar-denominated loans in relation to foreign trade transactions, which continued to be subject to Central Bank restrictions.
As part of its business, BBVA Francés conducts capital markets and securities operations directly in the over-the-counter market and indirectly in the BCBA. At the end of December 2015, the Bank had a 4.2% market share in the mutual fund portfolio management industry in Argentina through BBVA Francés Asset Management S.A. (“Mutual Investment Funds Manager”).
The Bank was one of the first companies listed on the BCBA, quoting since 1888 (ticker: FRAN). Its shares in the form of American Depositary Shares have been listed on the New York Stock Exchange since 1993 (ticker: BFR) and on the Madrid-based LATIBEX (“Mercado de Valores Latinoamericanos”) since December 1999 (ticker: XBFR).
BBVA Francés ended its fiscal year 2015 with Ps.110.7 billion in total assets, a total of Ps.76.9 billion in deposits on a consolidated basis, and a market capitalization of Ps.48.9 billion. It is the third largest private bank in terms of total deposits and the fourth in terms of total loans in the Argentine financial system according to statistics published by the Central Bank, as of November 30, 2015.
The following table presents financial information of our principal business for the year ended December 31, 2015.
As of December 31, 2015
(in thousands of pesos)
Discontinued
operations (2)
BBVA Francés (1)
The Bank has a large network of branches throughout Argentina. As of December 31, 2015 there were 285 attention-to-clients units, 251 of which are retail branches and 34 are specialized in the middle-market segment and institutions, while corporate banking is divided by industry: Consumer, Heavy Industries and Energy. BBVA Francés also had at December 31, 2015 14 in-company branches, one point of sale outlet (a contact point that offers only automated services and commercial assistance, but does not have a license granted by the BCRA to operate as a branch) and one point of express attention (see detailed description below under the subtitle Banking and Financial Services/Development of channels/Express attention point), 694 ATMs and 797 self-service terminals
21
(ATS), a telephone banking service, an Internet banking service called Francés Net and an app for smartphones from which clients and non-clients may access a wide variety of discounts and benefits. Through this wide network the Bank provides attention to approximately 2 million retail clients, 19,000 companies and 765 large corporations.
Strategy
The BBVA Group has been developing for years a “differential banking model”, focused on profitability but informed by principles of integrity, prudence and transparency. We have a permanent commitment to responsible banking in order to carry out our social mission.
This differential “BBVA Francés banking model” gives our business the flexibility and agility needed to adapt to the 21st century environment. It is based on four well-defined principles aimed at offering the best banking experience in the market and maintaining our leadership position in the future:
In light of these principles, in 2015 the BBVA Group devised a set of strategic priorities that guide the work to be done, with the goal of enhancing short-term results and successfully competing in the long term:
Plans for 2016
BBVA Francés believes that the present environment is complex, but at the same time it offers many opportunities. In this environment, client types are increasingly diverse: individuals and companies, digital and “classic.” Being able to give each of them due attention and satisfy their needs is a challenge BBVA Francés faces every day.
Challenges come not only from clients, but also from other actors such as employees, shareholders or regulators.
For this reason, BBVA Francés has defined its Strategic Plan for 2016-2018 with particular emphasis on the six priorities described above, deemed essential:
22
New Digital Banking
In a context of transformation, with technologies in permanent innovation, a generation of increasingly demanding clients, especially marked by the universal use of the Internet through mobile devices, and a host of new competitors offering innovative value proposals, BBVA Francés created the new Digital Banking and Transformation Division. The purpose is to transform the present-day business, adjust the commercial offer, adopt a multichannel strategy and a new distribution model, and re-devise all commercial and operational processes.
This change involved not only the creation of the new division, but also the reorientation of Commercial Banking and of all staff departments in order to accompany and provide leverage to the new strategy. This is the first step to achieve the goal of being the preferred bank for clients, one that they can rely on and recommend to others.
The main elements of the change include: transforming the client’s experience, developing offers based on information, creating channels and distribution models and optimizing and digitalizing all processes. It will be focused on the launching of new digital businesses with a strong culture of innovation.
Digital Banking will work through projects adapted to the local reality and developed by small multi-disciplinary teams. This entails a new, more agile and dynamic style of work, with a focus on execution and promoting internal entrepreneurship.
Quality
For some years now, BBVA Francés has been committed to working for a continuous improvement of the client experience with a view to achieving differentiation via the quality of our service.
As a result, for the third consecutive year BBVA Francés has been the most recommended bank by its clients, positioning itself as a leader with the highest Net Promoter Score (NPS) in the market. It has also substantially improved its standing in the high income segment, up from the 5th to 2nd place in the 2015 Banks ranking.
The NPS is a methodology that aims to understand how strongly our clients recommend BBVA Francés and the reasons for that. A set of experiences is valued (global experience, branch, internet, call center, among others) with a score between 0 (“surely wouldn't recommend it”) and 10 (“absolutely recommend it”). Clients are classified as Promoters, Neutrals or Detractors on the basis of the scores they give us. The final index is built by deducting the percentage of Detractors from the percentage of Promoters. Neutrals are not taken into account.
In order to improve our efficiency and productivity in 2015, we sought to leverage the basic goals of the Quality Plan, with the goal of proactively positioning the Bank as a leader in improving of the client experience, which is a key element to obtain recommendations by existing clients and to attract new clients.
In addition, in order to address the occasional instances in which the client experience does not meet our quality standards, two specific functions were formalized, which operate in two different stages:
23
As part of the cultural transformation promoted by BBVA Francés, we launched our second online course: “Perfecting Client Service,” focused on the conducts and behaviors oriented to a service culture. Seventy two percent of our employees participated in online training to improve the quality of service during 2015.
Within the framework of the Face-to-Face Quality Workshops, 27 meetings were staged during 2015 for sharing a vital experience through interaction among different areas, understanding the value of each person’s contribution as a component of the BBVA Francés value chain, putting the client at the center and striving to achieve the highest quality standards
Starting in December 2014, the functions of the officer responsible for attention to the user of financial services were re-allocated to Client Attention Management, whereas the Quality Management team remained in charge of ensuring compliance with the regulations in force for protection of the user of financial services with respect to:
Compliance with the provisions set forth in Section 2 of Communication “A” 5460 in all respects (operative offices and automated teller machines)
Banking and Financial Services
BBVA Francés is focused on the brokering business, mainly in the private sector. As of December 31, 2015, our private loan portfolio was Ps.55.9 billion, an increase of 36% compared to 2014, and our share of the private loan market was 7.8%.
During 2015, consumer loans registered strong growth, with a 42.4% increase in our portfolio. Such increase was mainly due to credit cards, with an increase of 59.8%, whereas car loans grew at a 23.6% rate and personal loans at a 20.6% rate.
Commercial loans grew 27.2% annually mainly due to the performance of loans to SMEs
In terms of liabilities, total deposits were Ps.76.9 billion at the end of 2015, 50% higher than the previous year, sight deposits increasing by 37% and time deposits by 59%.
As of December 31, 2015 the Bank’s dollar-denominated deposits totaled Ps.12,562 million (equivalent to US$966 million). These deposits represented 16% of the Bank’s total deposits.
The following table sets forth our estimates of the relative proportions of loans and deposits attributable to our principal markets
24
During 2015, BBVA Francés maintained its market position, centering its efforts on those values that marked the success of the strategy implemented in the preceding year.
In the area of consumer financing, the Bank staged the re-launching of Francés Go, with the new app Frances GO 2.0. The tool became the main channel through which we contact and interact with clients and non-clients, communicating promotions of strong impact involving leading brands in the main industries with the addition of experiences (i.e. tickets to football matches, international shows or exclusive events) via coupons and lotteries.
At the same time, the Bank continued with the holiday season campaigns, based on discounts and benefits. The Bank staged the popular “discount days” at the Unicenter shopping mall and “Summertime” campaigns were developed at the main tourist centers of the Argentine coastline, as well as a “Winter” campaign at Cerro Catedral, in San Carlos de Bariloche, the country’s most important skiing center.
BBVA Francés continues to have a presence in the world of entertainment, by sponsoring shows through its relationship with producers like Move and Popart and by offering differential services, such as exclusive pre-sale and installments without interest.
As sponsor of the two most important soccer clubs of Argentina, Boca Juniors and River Plate, the Bank accompanied its clients in one of the great Argentine passions, offering them exclusive benefits, such as visits to training sessions, photographs in the field and access to field seats among others. Halfway through the season, the Bank started sponsoring “Club Atlético Talleres de Córdoba”.
The Bank also adjusted its efforts in order to optimize its client-acquisition strategy and worked mainly on actions addressed to improve activation, use and retention of clients.
After re-engineering our client´s acquisition strategy in 2014, in 2015 we put substantial effort into multichannel experience, by incorporating new points of sale, one-click sales and actions aimed at gaining new clients through existing ones (“member get member”), thus generating an online response on the Bank’s website and app, which resulted in improved client acquisition results.
The consolidation of products offered through co-brandings was the result of the mature relationship with our partners, such as River, Boca, LANPASS, Peugeot. This has made it possible to increase brand recognition, creating tangible monetary value for the business and a growing sense of loyalty to the Bank.
The combined effect of all these actions has permitted to to consolidate BBVA Francés as the second largest private bank in the market for consumer financing products, maintaining the growth achieved in 2014 and gaining additional market share in 2015.
BBVA Francés continued proactively offering different investment options for each client:
The year started with an aggressive fixed-term deposit campaign in the first quarter, which fully complied with the established growth goals.
In addition, we continued to promote in multiple ways the use of the various channels where clients can sign up for our products safely and easily. We also added the possibility of operating fixed-term deposits through digital (mobile) channels.
25
The LANPASS Advanced Fixed-Term Deposit, which has little competition in the market and is highly valued by the different client segments, continues to be an innovative product that rewards clients with LAN frequent-flyer miles (“LANPASS KMs”) instead of a fixed interest rate, as traditional fixed-term deposits.
On July 27, 2015, the BCRA increased the minimum interest rate for long-term deposits and the maximum deposit amount to which that minimum rate applies (from 350,000 to 1 million pesos). BBVA Francés developed the tools required to appropriately and timely comply with this regulation.
Throughout 2015 BBVA Francés offered its clients investment alternatives based on their profiles with a view of making them maintain their investments with the Bank. This was achieved with a favorable spread versus the BCRA, in spite of the substantial volume of placements that were affected by the regulated rates. Near the end of the year, the new government de-regulated the rates for fixed-term deposits both in pesos and U.S. dollars.
In 2015, payroll management was a key driving force of our transactional business, with more than 17,000 new payrolls incorporated, the highest growth in the last three years.
To make this possible, we engaged in a series of commercial actions to attract, retain and finalize payrolls from companies, which involved designing offers tailored to employers and employees.
We believe that LANPASS, Francés Go and the alliances with Boca, River and Talleres were the main factors that made our payroll management products the most competitive in the market.
The challenge for 2016 will be to maintain this growth rate, focusing on attracting new clients and improving their experience.
Electronic banking continues its consolidation as a priority tool for BBVA Francés.
Automatic means have become the most important piece of the Transactions Migration Plan together with the cooperation of Express Managers at the branches, who instruct and help the clients in this process of change. There was staff of 152 managers giving assistance at 138 branches at December 31, 2015.
The Bank is working on an ambitious plan to be implemented in 2016, which involves an important investment and a significant increase in devices as well as the renovation of those that became obsolete, with the goal of replacing them for devices with greater and more advanced services.
In 2016, this plan will be intensified and the branches will be provided with tools and technology in order to improve management, and reduce amount and time attending customers and transactional costs.
We opened in 2015 an Express attention point at Reconquista 281, Microcentro, CABA, available from 7 to 20h. It includes four automated teller machines, four self-service stations, two Francés Express desks and personnel for assisting clients.
This new model is expected to help improve the clients’ experience by offering them a better service through modern technologies and channels. More operating sites are being made available, reducing waiting times and using more advanced equipment.
During the year, the Bank continued with the installation of “Plus” units, which have capacity for the recognition of banknotes and allow the introduction of deposits without using an envelope, with and without Visa Debit cards, into own or third parties’ accounts, with immediate crediting and 24-hour availability. As of December 31, 2015 there were 247 such units distributed at 184 branches.
26
In 2016 and the beginning of 2017 a significant investment will be made in new ATMs. The plan includes the installation of 54 Cash dispenser units and 43 Plus units, apart from the renovation of 146 Cash and 197 Plus units.
The Bank continued to go ahead with the installation of new self-service units, which permit making cash deposits, check deposits and credit card payments without using envelopes and with immediate crediting. As of December 31, 2015, the Bank had 327 units distributed in 93 branches.
These strategic advances result in an increase in operational capacity since they reduce processing tasks and facilitate operation, and are expected to permit enabling more hours of availability in the reception of transactions through these automatic means.
The equipment renovation plan includes the replacement of 418 self-service units which admit deposits in envelopes by new ATS with the capacity to recognize banknotes and checks. Furthermore, 61 additional ATS units will be installed at the branches.
New LED screens were installed which allow the client to navigate through Francés Net and manage his/her keywords, both at the Express and the Flagship Branches. At December 31, 2015, the Bank had 270 “Francés Express” screens operating in its offices.
New banknote counters with counterfeit recognition capacity were incorporated, making it possible to reduce teller times by accelerating the counting of money. At present, all branches have a device for every two tellers, covering 100% of the retail offices and in-company branches.
Since the third quarter of 2015 “Teller Systematics” was implemented as a new management model. Through it, tellers are integrated into the commercial or operative platform according to their orientation. This mode makes it possible to have integral tellers, equipped with a versatile, permanent profile in continuous relationship with the rest of the branch, resulting in significant productivity gains.
With respect to Francés Net, during 2015 various developments took place tending to digitalize clients, improve the service and promote digital sales, in addition to complying with the regulatory requirements with increasing flexibility. Some innovations in this channel were:
27
With respect to Francés Móvil, during the year a number of new functionalities were added in order to facilitate client transactions:
Also BBVA Francés is about to implement a new operating method to avoid the request for an 8-digit key in some transactions such as transfers, credit card payments and cellphone recharging.
During 2016 the Bank will work on the payment of services, subscription and redemption of mutual funds and the taking of personal loans.
Línea Francés continues to be one of the main alternative channels for the attention of clients. During 2015 5.2 million calls were received and more than 7.7 million transactions were carried out.
Business Trends by area
Retail Banking
As of December 2015, retail banking was intermediating a volume of transactions above Ps.80.3 billion. During the year, credit investment in pesos increased by 42%, to a total of Ps.30.8 billion.
28
It is important to point out that loans granted to micro companies within the framework of the BCRA regulations relating to credit lines for productive investments recorded a strong performance in 2015.
In terms of liabilities, client resources increased 42% to a volume of Ps.49.4 billion in deposits at December 31, 2015. Transactional deposits grew 40%, whereas fixed-term deposits were 45% higher than the previous year.
During 2015 we focused our work on the following issues:
Commercial and operative systematics are a fixture throughout the retail world.
Significant advances were made this year in systematizing controls, alerts and procedures both in the commercial and operative areas.
BBVA Francés opened in 2014 a new ‘Flagship branch’ office, which is an innovative space through which the Bank has launched the layout for the branch of the future. This new office model is aimed at improving the relationship with the clients by emphasizing such concepts as transparency, innovation and use of new technologies.
The branch is located in Martínez, in the province of Buenos Aires, and was built according to a futuristic design which we expect will become an icon in the district.
With this new office model, BBVA Francés places its clients at the center of the relationship, providing them with an office where the whole space is for the client.
As is the case with every innovation achievement, and with a new test methodology, the tools for attention to clients have been substantially improved, moving away from established standards and toward strong innovations.
The results so far are quite positive in terms of levels of attention, flow of new clients and requests from current clients seeking to be attended under this new branch concept. A substantial percentage of our clients operate digitally, in line with our strategy.
This channel’s management area continues to be strengthened and adjusted as a channel mainly devoted to the payroll segment. We made significant progress in productivity and made adjustments to the management and direction styles.
Access to the digital world continues to be a priority. We continue to simplify access to our digital tools and the use of Francés Net and Francés Móvil.
29
Additional strength was given to the functionalities for operating and acquiring products and the goal for 2016 is to have a new Francés Net with a completely renovated experience for clients.
We are developing various means and tools to ensure that clients become acquainted with our digital tools, experience them and verify their significant benefits.
Through internal campaigns and communications we promoted the spread of digital banking among our employees in all branches.
The launching of a new paradigm for Francés GO, with benefits and experiences for clients and non-clients, is something new in the Argentine market.
The year 2015 was heavily marked by the promotion of productivity, client attention and digital banking development.
In the retail banking area, we continued to advance towards a more personalized management supported by tools and protocols and assigning specialized managers by sector:
High-value clients are one of the main strategic objectives of BBVA Francés. During 2015, the so-called PREMIUM and PREMIUM WORLD segments have continued to develop as planned, with a schedule of actions and development of products suited to their requirements.
Among the highlights of the year are the following:
Improvements in the Model of Attention: training sessions were held for operators of the Francés Premium and Premium World Lines, oriented to the knowledge of the new Protocol of attention for High Value clients of the Francés Line. Apart from this, new Premium and Premium World Executives were trained so as to maintain management quality levels.
Middle Market
As of December 31, 2015, this segment was intermediating a volume of transactions above Ps.24.6 billion. During the year, credit investment in pesos grew 46% to Ps.15.8 billion.
Middle Market Banking maintained the best non-performing portfolio indicator in the market at December 31, 2015, with an NPL of 0.17%, as a result of careful administration and persistent monitoring of alerts and red flags.
Business profitability was an aspect to be preserved, and this was reflected in the income from services, which totaled Ps.867.5 million during 2015, up 102% during the year. Foreign trade and insurance were the main drivers of this growth.
In terms of liabilities, client resources went up 33% to a volume of deposits of Ps.8.8 billion at December 31, 2015. Sight deposit balances went up 39%, and fixed-term deposits up 11%.
30
As for the commercial strategy, it was centered on two basic objectives:
As a result of these actions, the total of clients assigned to and attended by company officers was 20,750 at the end of 2015. More than 160 clients were added to the Institutions segment, which at the end of 2015 had a portfolio of 3,551 clients, compared to 5,300 in the Agricultural segment.
Middle-market banking, together with its support areas, continued to develop the Relationship and Direction Model for the purpose of synchronizing all-inclusive client management, ratifying its centrality in all relationships.
This project was implemented along three main lines of action:
By the end of 2016, we expect our Banking business will be oriented to generate relationships with clients by combining an approach in three dimensions:
These three dimensions find support in processes that are the key for managing the business: Comex, Canal Vendor, Transactional, Leasing, Checks, Clients, Prices and Loans for productive investment
BBVA Francés continues to work in order to be a strategic ally of Argentine SMEs. It directs its commercial offering to services, industrial or commercial companies with annual revenues up to Ps.18 million.
For the purpose of spreading this model, in 2015 the Bank added 18 new executives. In addition, 18 specialists focused on companies with higher revenues added to their functions advising clients from both segments. Thus, SMEs and Businesses have already incorporated a total of 110 highly trained individuals to further the development of these clients.
On the other hand, and for the purpose of supporting SMEs’ growth, an integral program was launched called “On the road to success,” which includes a digital platform where an SME gets access to a community and receives free of charge online training on finance, business administration, leadership and personal management. It can also sign up for participation in the Road to Success
31
prizes. These rewards distinguish the best company growth plans according to four categories and give all contestants the opportunity to access free-of-charge in-person training at the Business School of the Argentine Catholic University, where they acquire expertise and analysis tools to improve such plans. There were also Ps.100,000 prizes for the winners in each category.
Thus we continued to work in order to provide more and much better services to the country’s most dynamic sector.
Corporate & Investment Banking (“C&IB”)
As of December 2015, C&IB was intermediating a volume of transactions above Ps.20.0 billion. During the year, credit investment in pesos increased by 15%, to a total of Ps.8.1 billion mainly due to a coordinated effort between C&IB, global management and the clients.
In terms of liabilities, client resources increased 40% to a volume of Ps.11.9 billion in deposits at December 31, 2015. Transactional deposits grew 24%, whereas fixed-term deposits were 60% higher than the previous year. All of these mainly due to a coordinated effort between C&IB, global management and the clients
Income from services continues to evolve favorably given the strengthening of transactional services and a consolidated relationship with clients. This strategy was the key to duplicating payment volumes and significantly increasing collection volumes.
In sum, in 2015 C&IB focused its management on increasing the transactional business. It consolidated the relationship with the clients thanks to a better understanding of their transactions, keeping ahead of their needs and offering a set of products and services adapted to them.
The development of activities throughout the year was marked by local and international factors that caused a slight deceleration of the Argentine economy as compared to previous years. The presidential election, the re-appreciation of the dollar and the slump in the price of commodities were some of the events that brought about the above-mentioned situation.
Anticipating this, the management of Corporate Banking was focused on gaining the client’s loyalty through a continuous development of non-credit products. Tools such as Francés Net Cash made it possible to improve the payments and collections system and integrate the relationship with Global and Distribution Markets, multiplying the offer of spot products and derivatives. The synergies with other areas of the Bank were also strengthened in order to give a boost to transactions in the Companies and Retail segments.
Global Market Products have been quite important with respect to the market’s liquidity needs, with the placement of new corporate debt issuances. Likewise, and as a complement to the investment banking business, a structuring service has been provided through swap transactions (IRS), designed to cover the clients’ interest rate risks.
Related products
During the year, the Bank maintained its bi-monthly campaigns to attract new clients, as well as those based on the portfolio’s cross-sell (Televenta).
We conducted tests to promote the sale of policies in two territories through the figure of the Insurance Promoter. The tests were successful and we will extend the experience to other territories.
The sale of insurance policies for companies continued, mainly in the SMEs and Middle-market segments through specialists.
In order to maintain adequate coverage levels for the clients, the insured amounts continued to be adjusted for the different types of insurance.
A campaign was also launched for insuring against ATM robbery in the Premium segment, which resulted in strong growth of the product’s penetration in that segment.
A new record was established in the sale of insurance through ATMs and efforts will be made to expand the range of products offered.
32
We also provide advisory services to our clients for the selection of adequate coverage of risks related to life, personal accidents and home and ATM robbery, within a range of products offered by certain insurance companies.
Additionally, as part of our overall business, we hold 12.22% of the capital stock of BBVA Consolidar Seguros S.A., with BBVA holding the remaining shares of the company.
In 2015 the Bank continued along the path marked by the regulatory modifications that changed the direction of the business.
The design of a new business model for the management of investors’ portfolios, presented as a target for the year, is still pending resolution by the regulatory body.
We made progress in adapting systems for this new segment, aside from a series of successful tests with simulated portfolios.
The year ended up with changes in the foreign-exchange area which are expected to redefine the industry, orienting it toward a longer-term investment profile, although this transition is likely to be gradual. The Bank works in order to stay ahead of this scenario by developing products adapted to the needs of our clients..
During 2015, Argentina’s mutual investment funds industry continued on a path marked by regulatory changes that altered the orientation of the business.
According to provisional data compiled by the Chamber of Mutual Investment Funds (CAFCI), the industry ended the year with assets under management of Ps.212,529.9 million, up Ps.80,219.5 million from December 31, 2014, or an increase of 60.6%.
This increase was led by the market-funds segment, which ended the year totaling Ps.160,880.3 million, a 66.1% increase. Noteworthy in this category were the fixed-income funds, which increased by Ps.43,833.2 million, or 65.4%, to a total of Ps.110,817 million at December 31, 2015.
In the meantime, the fixed-term deposit funds reached the end of 2015 with a total of Ps.51,649.7 million in assets under management, an increase of Ps.16,215.9 million, or 45.8%.
At December 31, 2015, the assets managed by BBVA Francés Asset Management amounted to Ps.8,845.8 million, an increase of Ps.2,273.7 million, or 34.6% over the previous year, with a 4.2% participation in the Mutual Investment Funds market.
In the fixed-term funds category managed by the Bank, FBA Renta Pesos ended 2015 with Ps.2,559.5 million of assets under management, an increase of Ps.43.9 million, or 1.8% over the preceding year.
Regarding the market funds, we experienced an increase of Ps.2,229.8 million or 55% during 2015. These funds ended the year with Ps.6,286.3 million in assets under management, and a market share of 3.9%.
In this last category, the growth of the FBA Ahorro Pesos fund stood out, which went up Ps.1,766.1 million (+47.8%), to end the year with Ps.5,458.8 million in assets under management.
Revenue from services generated by the company reached Ps.111,998.7 million in 2015, 163.1% higher than in 2014.
At December 31, 2015 the company had registered with the C.N.V. eight managed funds whose situation at such date was as follows:
33
As of December 31, 2015, our mutual funds had the following equity volumes:
Source: see Note 13.2. to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
As in previous years, the Company paid particular attention to the evolution of the international economic and financial situation, the behavior of the currencies market and the performance of prices as regards crude oil and other commodities. Within the local context, the monitoring of activity, inflation and public spending levels was intensified.
The year ended with changes in foreign exchange regulations, which are expected to redefine the industry and orient it towards a longer-term investment profile, even if such transition is expected to be gradual. The Bank aims to keep ahead of the new scenario by developing products adapted to the needs of our clients. For 2016, mutual investment funds are expected to constitute an efficient alternative for different types of investment, leading us to believe that the industry outlook is favorable.
In such scenario, the Company will continue to work in order to expand the offer of products and contribute to an improved management of investors’ risks.
International Operations
Since the Argentine Crisis began at the end of 2001, access to international markets for Argentine companies has been quite limited. Notwithstanding this constraint, we have been able to assist our clients with traditional foreign trade services, including letters of credit, collections, bank drafts, fund transfers and foreign currency transactions.
Business Area Financial Information
34
The following table shows assets and income derived from the business areas for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013:
Banking Financial
BBVA Banco
Francés S.A.(1)
PSA Finance S.A.
Total
As of December 31, 2014
BBVA Francés.(1)
35
As of December 31, 2013
C. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. (BBVA)
As of December 31, 2015, BBVA owned approximately 76% of our capital stock.
BBVA is the result of a merger by absorption of Argentaria and Banco Bilbao Vizcaya, S.A., formerly Spanish retail banking, asset management and insurance providers, into Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. The merger was approved by the shareholders of both institutions on December 18, 1999. As of December 31, 2015, BBVA, through its subsidiaries, has a presence in 9 Latin American countries, United States, Mexico, several countries throughout Europe and Turkey.
BBVA is a global financial group, organized in six geographical business segments: (i) Banking Activity in Spain, (ii) Real Estate Activity in Spain, (iii) Mexico, (iv) South America, (v) the United States and (vi) Eurasia. In addition to these geographical business areas, BBVA has a separate “Corporate Center” segment. This segment handles certain general management functions. Some of the benefits we receive from the BBVA Group are:
Subsidiaries and affiliates of BBVA Francés
In 2015 the local securities market was affected by political developments; surveys, political analyses and the partial results of a series of elections, all of which conducted to market volatility.
The main market indicators ended the year up 35%. Nevertheless, the index that only includes Argentine companies (M.AR) recorded a 60% increase. Such difference was a result of the downward trend experienced by both Petróleo Brasileiro APBR (-60%) and Tenaris TS (-8.7%).
At the end of 2015, the market capitalization of domestic shares was Ps.729,048 million, 43.2% higher than at December 31, 2014 (with a total of 87 companies).
Against this context, the securities markets had a strong performance, with the bonds index (IAMC) recorded a 53% increase (the largest since 2009). This is the result of a change in the political scenario and developments regarding the remaining defaulted debt leading to better expectations for the placement of new debt, a greater control of public spending and lower inflation.
In this scenario, since the enactment of Law 26,831 and RG 622/13 CNV, Francés Valores S.A. (“Francés Valores”) was devoted to providing the service of purchasing and selling negotiable securities and other authorized securities and investments directly to clients. Since January 1, 2015 the transactions with securities through BBVA Francés, as promoter of Francés Valores, were canceled in accordance with the new market regulations.
36
For this reason, the current transactions and the operating income of Francés Valores were reduced, limiting its management activities to investing assets in its portfolio, but keeping its operational capacity and the search for new commercial and business opportunities. In this context, the net income for 2015 was Ps.17 million, mainly generated by the revaluation of its own investments and the minimum operative expenses required in order to maintain the company with full capacity to operate.
As of December 31, 2015, the assets managed by BBVA Francés Asset Management (“Francés AM”) amounted to Ps.8,845.8 million, an increase of Ps.2,273.7 million, or 34.6%, over the previous year, with a 4.2% market share in the mutual investment funds market.
Between December 2014 and 2015 the average assets managed by Francés AM increased by Ps.3.8 million, or 55%, from Ps.6.6 million to Ps.10.5 million.
In the fixed-term funds category managed by Francés AM, FBA Renta Pesos ended the year with assets under management of Ps.2,559.5 million, an increase of Ps.43.9 million, or 1.8%, from 2014.
With respect to market funds, Francés AM experienced an increase of Ps.2,229.8 million, or 55%, during the year. These funds ended the year with a Ps.6,286.3 million, and a market share of 3.9%.
In this last category stood out the growth of the FBA Ahorro Pesos fund, up Ps.1,766.1 million (47.8%), to end the year with Ps.5,458.8 million in managed funds.
Commissions generated by Francés AM in 2015 amounted to Ps.111,998.7 million, 163.1% more than in 2014.
Grupo Consolidar comprises Consolidar A.F.J.P. S.A, (Administradora de Fondos de Jubilaciones y Pensiones, under liquidation proceedings) and BBVA Consolidar Seguros S.A., where BBVA Francés had stakes of 53.89% and 12.22%, respectively as of December 31, 2015.
Consolidar A.F.J.P. S.A. (undergoing liquidation proceedings)
Law No. 26,425 was enacted on December 4, 2008. It abolished the capitalization system that was part of the Integrated Pension and Retirement System (Sistema Integrado de Jubilaciones y Pensiones) which was merged into and substituted by a single public distribution system called SIPA (Sistema Integrado Previsional Argentino, i.e. Argentine Integrated Pension System). As a consequence, Consolidar A.F.J.P. S.A. no longer managed the resources in the individual capitalization accounts of its members, who were beneficiaries of the Argentine Integrated Pension System. These funds were transferred to the Sustainability Guarantee Fund of the Argentine Pension System in the same form as they were invested, and the Argentine Social Security Administration (ANSES) became the only and single holder of its assets and rights.
On October 29, 2009 the ANSES issued Resolution No. 290/2009 granting pension and retirement fund managers the possibility of reconverting their corporate purpose to manage funds consisting of voluntary contributions and deposits of the members in their respective capitalization accounts. Interested companies had 30 business days to express their interest.
In view of all of the above, on December 28, 2009, and bearing in mind that it was impossible for Consolidar A.F.J.P. S.A. to maintain the corporate purpose for which it had been organized, the company held a Unanimous Special Shareholders Meeting. The resolution of this meeting was to dissolve and subsequently wind-up the company as of December 31, 2009. It was understood that this was the best alternative to preserve in the best possible way the creditors’ and shareholders’ interests. At the same time, and in accordance with the terms of the Argentine Corporations Law, the Shareholders’ Meeting resolved to appoint accountants Messrs. Gabriel Orden and Rubén Lamandia, to liquidate Consolidar A.F.J.P. S.A. These accountants are the legal representatives of the Company as of December 31, 2009 and are working in order to wind it up. As of this date, they are taking all necessary steps to carry out the liquidation of Consolidar A.F.J.P. S.A.
On January 28 2010, the dissolution of Consolidar A.F.J.P. S.A. (in liquidation) was registered with the IGJ, as were the names of the appointed liquidators.
37
The General and Special Shareholders’ Meeting of Consolidar A.F.J.P S.A. (undergoing liquidation proceedings) approved on October 19 2009 a voluntary reduction of the corporate capital by Ps.75 million, which was approved by the Office of Corporations on January 11, 2010. Subsequently, on January 19, 2010, all capital contributions were transferred to the shareholders, in accordance with the above-mentioned reduction.
BBVA Francés, as shareholder, requested that Consolidar A.F.J.P. S.A. (undergoing liquidation proceedings) submit a request for negotiations with the Argentine Ministry of Economy and Public Finance (Ministerio de Economía y Finanzas Públicas de la Nación) and the Argentine Social Security Administration (Administración Nacional de la Seguridad Social). This was done in accordance with the terms of Law No. 26,425 in order to find solutions to the consequences of implementation of the Law. This request was filed by Consolidar A.F.J.P. S.A. (undergoing liquidation proceedings) on June 11, 2010.
In turn, on December 7, 2010, Consolidar A.F.J.P. S.A. (undergoing liquidation proceedings) filed a complaint for damages against the Federal government and the Ministry of Labor, Employment and Social Security at the Contentious-Administrative Federal Court number 4, Secretariat number 7, under case number 40,437/2010. The claim was confirmed by BBVA Francés as controlling shareholder of the company. On July 15, 2011 Consolidar A.F.J.P. S.A. (undergoing liquidation proceedings) and BBVA Francés filed an additional motion to determine the amount of damages. On March 9, 2012, the Court ordered the service of process to the National State.
In this connection, on May 13, 2013, the judge in charge ordered the commencement of the trial stage. The Company is collecting and submitting all witness, documentary and expert proof and on May 28, 2013 it accompanied the examinations and the statements of its witnesses. There have been no further updates on the case since then.
BBVA Consolidar Seguros S.A.
BBVA Seguros operates in fire, mixed family and comprehensive insurance, civil liability, theft, personal accidents, umbrella life and other insurance risks.
During 2015, it achieved a level of issued premiums of Ps.1,496.3 million, which represents a growth rate of 42% with respect to the previous year. This increase was due to our strategy for combining an ample variety of products with multiple channels of distribution and attention, all of which are based on segmentation of client’s needs. Accidents paid reached Ps.204.5 million in 2015, that is to say, an increase of 14% over its issued premiums.
Within the framework of the “Plan Estratégico Nacional de Seguros” (PLANES), and by Resolution SSN 37.163 dated October 22, 2012, the General Regulations for the Insurance Activity were amended for the purpose of redirecting an important part of the insurance companies’ investments to the productive sector of the Argentine economy. The new clause (k), point 35.8.1 of the Regulations for the Insurance Activity established a range of percentages on total investments, excluding real property, which the companies must assign to certain productive investments.
Clause (k) states that the investments must consist of debt securities, financial trusts, deferred checks sponsored by Reciprocal Guarantee Companies (all of them authorized for listing), as well as mutual funds (FCI) PyME or FCI productive of regional economies and infrastructure, and of technological innovation projects, assets or other negotiable securities whose finality is the financing of productive or infrastructure projects at medium and long term in the Republic of Argentina.
For 2016, the plan for BBVA Seguros will be to continue expanding its main lines of business, in particular personal accidents, umbrella life, life, debit balance, family integral and combined and other risks, based on offering products to satisfy in a differential manner the needs of its main clients.
The shares of PSA Finance are divided in equal parts between BBVA Francés and Banque PSA Finance, a subsidiary of PSA Peugeot Citroën S.A., with headquarters in France.
PSA Finance’s main business is focused on providing secured loans for the purchase and leasing of new Peugeot and Citroën vehicles. It also offers financing to purchase second-hand cars (for clients suggested by the official concessionaries’ networks), as well as other financial products and services linked to the purchase, maintenance and insurance of vehicles.
The motor car industry in Argentina closed the year with a total of 622,000 vehicle licenses, 4.9% less than 2014.
38
The year 2015 has been difficult for Peugeot and Citroën , mainly due to restrictions imposed on the importation of cars and car parts, which caused a reduction in PSA Finance’s market share greater than the overall market decline. The market share of PSA Finance went from 15.1% in 2014 to 11.7% in 2015.
In spite of this adverse environment, PSA Finance reached a market penetration of 18.3%, in the market for transactions involving newly-issued vehicle licenses, for both brands, an increase of 2.4 percentage points with respect to 2014. This was mainly the result of the close cooperation between PSA Finance, the motor car terminal and the network of concessionaries.
The company has successfully managed this adverse environment and achieved a total of 16,923 financed transactions in 2015, including secured loans for new, second-hand and leased cars, for a total value of Ps.1,565 million.
As of December 31, 2015, the portfolio of 51,999 clients reached a valuation of Ps.2,195 million, 1.8% below the figure at the end of 2014.
Regarding product offerings, in 2015, as in previous years, PSA Finance maintained a working strategy of jointly embracing the Peugeot and Citroën brands, paying particular attention to the launching of so-called financial product campaigns at subsidized rates. This has softened the impact of a contraction in financing.
Furthermore, intensive work was made in relation to the network of concessionaries, focused on the concept of fidelity and maintaining diversified product offerings, with an eye on the competitors. Thanks to this, 99% of the concessionaries in the Peugeot Citroën commercial network continue to work with PSA Finance, with the result that 85.4% of all financed sales involved a loan from PSA Finance.
In a context of market contraction, the work in the past few years has been focused on attaining certain profitability goals, and 2015 has been no exception. This has involved, as in previous years, developing a policy of optimization and containment of financial costs by carefully tracking market conditions on a regular basis in order to benefit from the best combination of funding alternatives at all times.
As a consequence, net income for PSA Finance was Ps.261 million in 2015, an increase of 22% over 2014.
Considering that 2016 will be a transition year, in a context that has witnessed a change of government together with a change of macroeconomic policies, the car industry foresees a scenario where registrations of new vehicles (licenses) will be in the vicinity of 600,000. PSA Finance expects to keep working to maintain its market share.
We have developed a system of excellence over the past years, placing the focus on the company’s strategy, fostering the development of market-competitive products and putting in the hands of Peugeot and Citroën concessionaires a set of tools for selling our financial products, with profitability as the key element. In 2016 we expect to continue on the same path.
Rombo Compañía Financiera (RCF) is the main financing company of the Renault concessionaries’ network, both for new and second-hand vehicles. In 2015 Renault achieved a 12.7% share of the car market. In an environment of strong competition it has managed to maintain its share and positioning based on the launching and renovation of models with the significant support of secured loans provided by its financial entity.
Although the industry as a whole was negatively affected by high interest rates combined with the limitation on imports, this negative impact was counterbalanced by good commercial management, mainly focused on improving penetration and fidelity within the network and with a particular emphasis on the control and management of commercial risk.
With this support, RCF financed a record 21,797 new vehicles in 2015 (compared to 13,804 in 2014) and 4,611 second-hand units (compared to 3,900 in 2014), a growth of 49%. Thus the aggregate value of financing transactions was Ps.2,914 million, an increase of 36% with respect to the Ps.2,138 million financed in 2014 and a level similar to that of 2013.
These levels allowed RCF to keep its position as one of the leading financial companies in the Argentine market, ranking as one of the most important companies based on the amount of granted loans and client fidelity.
39
The indicators that measure portfolio risk and quality have maintained relatively low values as compared to the company’s historical levels. The volume of non-performing loans increased from 2.6% in December 2014 to 1.4% at the close of 2015, mainly as a result of a significant increase in the loan portfolio.
Regarding financing, during 2015 two series of corporate bonds were issued for a total amount of Ps.342.4 million, with a total outstanding balance of Ps.520 million in corporate bonds at the end of the year. The 2015 issuances were the greatest in the company’s history. The amount of the program remained at Ps.1,000 million, and it was rated as “raAA” by Fix SCR S.A. Agente Calificadora de Riesgo and as “AA2.ar” by Moody’s.
Net income during 2015 was Ps.233.9 million, 10% lower than in 2014, due to a lower amount of transactions. It should be noted that our financial management was able to achieve significant savings in financing costs in a context of marked volatility and uncertainty, and was also able to quickly adapt the company’s structure to the new volume of transactions.
The following chart reflects our subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015:
40
The following information is related to our subsidiaries and affiliates as of December 31, 2015:
Subsidiary or Affiliate Company
Country ofIncorporation/Residence
BBVA FrancésOwnershipand Voting Power (in percentages)
Principal Activity
Stockholders’Equity (in millions of pesos) (1) (2)
Equity Investments
The following are all positions that we hold in non-financial institutions where we own more than 2% of the invested companies’ equity as of December 31, 2015.
Investment
Country
% of Shares Owned (in percentages)
TotalStockholders’Equity (inmillions of pesos)
D. PROPERTY, PLANTS AND EQUIPMENT
BBVA Francés is domiciled in Argentina and has its principal executive offices at Reconquista 199, C1003ABB Buenos Aires, Argentina. The principal executive offices, which we own, are approximately 16,000 square meters in area.
At December 31, 2015, our branch network consisted of 251 retail branches, of which 112 were located in properties that we own and 139 were located in properties leased to us. The branches are located throughout all of the 23 Argentine provinces as well as the City of Buenos Aires.
On July 10, 2013, BBVA Francés and Consultatio S.A. signed a sale and purchase agreement, under which the Bank acquired 23 of the 33 floors of the building under construction by Consultatio S.A., which will become the “BBVA Tower.” This is the largest corporate headquarters real estate development project in the country and is part of the plan designed in 2010 by BBVA Francés to unify its core areas, currently divided among 10 buildings in the City of Buenos Aires. The goal is to have a building with the highest construction and environmental standards that will allow the Bank’s staff to work together in the same area, thus achieving greater efficiency. The building is being developed according to the highest international environmental and sustainability standards and with the commitment of the BBVA Group to preserving the environment. The investment of approximately Ps.1,200 million has a payment schedule associated with the work progress of the project. To date, construction is progressing according to plan and projected for completion in 2016. As of December 31, 2015 the Bank had invested approximately Ps.1,340 million in the project.
E. SELECTED STATISTICAL INFORMATION
The following information is included for analytical purposes and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements as well as “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects”. This information has been prepared from our financial records, which are maintained in accordance with the regulations established by the Central Bank and do not reflect adjustments necessary to state the information in accordance with U.S. GAAP. See Note 25 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a summary of the significant differences between Argentine Banking GAAP and U.S. GAAP.
41
The average balances of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, including the related interest earned or paid, were calculated on a monthly basis in the case of the financial information of BBVA Francés and its subsidiaries. Average balances have been separated between those denominated in pesos and in dollars.
The nominal interest rate is the amount of interest earned or paid during the period divided by the related average balance.
The nominal average rates for each fiscal year were converted to average real rates as follows:
Where:
Rp: real average rate for Argentine peso-denominated assets and liabilities of BBVA Francés;
Rd: real average rates for dollar-denominated assets and liabilities of BBVA Francés;
Np: nominal peso average rate in peso-denominated assets and liabilities for the fiscal year;
Nd: nominal dollar average rate in dollar-denominated assets and liabilities for the fiscal year;
D: devaluation rate of the Argentine peso to the dollar for the fiscal year; and
I: Argentine inflation rate (“WPI”).
The formula for the average real rates for dollar-denominated assets and liabilities (Rd), when compared with the corresponding nominal rates, reflects the loss, or gain, in purchasing power of the dollar caused by the difference between peso devaluation and inflation in Argentina for each fiscal year.
Included in interest earned are the net gains on our portfolio of government securities and related differences in market quotations. We manage our trading activities in government securities as an integral part of our business. We do not, as a matter of practice, distinguish between interest income and gain or loss on our government securities portfolio. Non-accrual loans have been included in the related average loan calculation.
Negative interest rates in real terms occur in periods when the inflation rate exceeds the nominal interest rate in pesos or exceeds the combination of the nominal interest rate on dollar-denominated assets or liabilities and the devaluation rate.
The following illustrates the calculation of the real interest rate in pesos for a dollar-denominated asset yielding a nominal annual interest rate of 20% (Nd=0.20) using different combinations of devaluation and inflation rates. If devaluation is 15% per annum (D=0.15) and inflation runs at a rate of 25% per annum (I=0.25), the result is as follows:
which in this case means that, because inflation exceeds devaluation, the real interest rate in pesos is less than the nominal interest rate in dollars. In this example, if the devaluation rate had been 30% per annum, and the other assumptions had remained the same, then the real interest rate in pesos would have been 24.8% per annum, which is more than the nominal interest rate in dollars. If the inflation rate were to exceed 38% per annum, then the real interest rate in pesos on this dollar denominated asset would become negative.
Average Balance Sheets, Interest Earned on Interest-Earning Assets and Interest Paid on Interest-Bearing Liabilities
The following tables show average balances, interest amounts and real rates for our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.
42
Average balance (1)
Average real rate (2)
43
44
45
46
The following tables show average balances, interest amounts and nominal rates for our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.
Average nominal rate (2)
Average Nominal rate (2)
47
48
49
Average
Nominal rate (2)
50
Changes in Interest Income and Interest Expense; Volume and Rate Analysis
The following tables allocate, by currency of denomination, changes in our interest income and interest expense between changes in the average volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and changes in their respective nominal interest rates for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 compared to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 compared to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. Volume and rate variances have been calculated based on movements in average balances over the period and changes in nominal interest rates on average interest-earning assets and average interest-bearing liabilities. The net change attributable to changes in both volume and rate has been allocated to volume. Trading and yield on government trading and investment accounts results are included in the computation of interest income in all fiscal years.
51
52
Interest-Earning Assets: Net Interest Margin and Spread
The following table analyzes, by currency of denomination, our levels of average interest-earning assets and net interest income, and illustrates the comparative margins and spreads for each of the fiscal years indicated.
53
Investment Portfolio: Government and Private Securities
We own, manage and trade a portfolio of securities issued by the Argentine and other governments and private issuers. The following table sets out our investments in Argentine and other governments and private securities as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 by type and currency of denomination.
54
The following table analyzes the remaining maturities of our investment portfolio as of December 31, 2015 in accordance with issuance terms.
Loan Portfolio
The following table analyzes our loan portfolio by types of loan at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013. Loans are stated before deduction of the allowance for loan losses.
55
Secured Loans
Credit Policy
Comprehensive management
The Risks Department of BBVA Francés continues to adjust its comprehensive management model by reconditioning its structures and improving its policies aimed at providing the solution that is best suited to the clients’ requirements, the changes of environment, and the requirements of the local regulatory body. It is also oriented to permanently improving the tools and processes, focused on the detection, monitoring and mitigation of each of the risks incurred by the Bank.
This model makes it possible to satisfactorily comply with the guidelines set forth by the B.C.R.A in its communications.
“Risks” comprises three big groups:
The area’s objective is to ensure portfolio quality by controlling the origination of businesses and optimizing credit recoveries under best-practice standards. This without disregarding the main focus that is centered on the client, with particular emphasis on not inducing client over-indebtedness.
Credit risk ratios and performance
The evolution of non-performing loans and coverage ratios shows a good behavior of the credit risk portfolio, as has been the case over the past few years. The coverage ratio was 298.90% at December 2015, whereas the NPL ratio was 0.64%, thus maintaining the leadership in the financial system in terms of risk quality.
Management Units
The different risk units provide support to the management of commercial banking entities, both as regards admission and in the monitoring and recovery of credits. The model has been configured on the basis of the Bank’s business structure.
Retail Risks
It manages the clients of Retail and SMEs banking, including admission by means of predictive/statistical tools, both reactive and behavioral, admission of special cases, tools and policies management and portfolio monitoring.
With this configuration, the Bank continued with the intensive development of methods and tools to strengthen automated risk management, which entails a qualitative change in the proactive offer of services, to achieve greater decentralization of credit decision making, allowing the reactive admission teams to improve their value contribution.
56
The Bank currently uses a methodology based on risk groups, which permits more specialized offers and greater management capacity in the collection of problematic debts. This methodology has been complemented by regional differentiation regarding minimum income, credit assistance per product and purchasing power differences.
In 2013 the Bank launched re-estimated reactive and proactive scorings in order to achieve greater discrimination among risks. In 2014 the Bank incorporated a reactive evaluation tool for legal persons, which permits decentralizing standard credit decisions and those involving higher-profile companies. In 2015 we started a re-estimation of the proactive score and the application of new income predictors using specific behavioral variables that improve the models’ predictive capacity, which will be implemented during 2016.
Finally, one of the most important developments of the year involved the possibility of making credit assessments through online evaluation engines that incorporate the Bank’s credit policies. These can be used both on the website and through commercial partners.
Given the relevance of proactive selling, mechanisms have been implemented which control the quality of pre-approved offers.
In the SMEs segment, intensive campaigns have been developed for the qualification of clients by pre-approval methods, improving the offer and making it more flexible for the client. In 2105, pre-approved offers were incorporated for clients from outside the banking system.
Regarding risk tracking and monitoring, the Bank continues to apply a differential monitoring policy to fast-track collectives (clients with a high chance of default).
Middle Market and Corporate Risk
Focused on resolving the needs of the business, a dynamic structure has been achieved, in close relationship with the requirements of the environment, always taking into account the principles of caution and prudence, conditions which are necessary in order to maintain a standard of excellence as regards the quality of risks.
In 2015 the Bank consolidated the process to put the client in closer contact with risk decisions, so as to fulfill his needs in a more efficient way, consolidating regionalization with respect to middle-market risks and a scheme of delegated powers which permitted rapid and efficient actions.
With respect to the productive investment lines, the guidelines established by the BCRA were duly complied with. The process of placement of products was continued by means of special campaigns and pre-approved qualification lines for certain types of clients.
As regards the attention of the Corporate Banking business, coordination between the commercial and risks teams must be underlined as it achieved a reduction of response times oriented to satisfy the requirements of the business while maintaining risk quality.
In the field of improvement and innovation in relation to wholesale risk decision tools, during 2015 a wholesale risks website was created as a space of communication with the business areas. This website substantially accelerates the personalized management of internal clients. The Bank consolidated the use of the “Risk Analyst” tool, intended for the sector of big companies and corporations, which provides a distinctive analysis of different risk profiles. There was also an improvement in the risk-adjusted profitability information process, which enhanced the automatic provision of results on the “Client Profitability Card,” which contains information on the reciprocity and profitability of the Bank’s clients. The use of the companies rating model implemented in 2014 was also continued and monitored in order to measure the model’s degree of discrimination and determine future improvements.
Regarding the tracking of risks, we implemented a process, the “Asset Allocation tool,” which allows an exposure-to-risk analysis by sectors. It provides monthly information that makes it possible to monitor concentration in the different economic activities and make decisions in a fast and effective way. Likewise, in the monitoring committees, which meet fortnightly, the steps to follow are discussed in particular cases, as well in specific subjects relating to the wholesale credit risk policy.
Recoveries
This area manages the recovery of debts since their registration in the non-performing portfolio. This includes debts held by the Bank as well as those held by related companies (PSA Finance and Rombo Compañía Financiera).
57
The area’s working methodology is to aim for automation and improvements in the processes with existing resources, thus generating shorter response times, greater specialization levels and increased profitability in terms of collections per resource, as well as efficiency improvements, taking into consideration the absorption of greater workloads measured in the number of non-performing entries per resource.
The different functions or management teams are divided into clusters and grouped together so that they may be responsible for most of the processes. In addition, the Management developed another specific area (Policies, Software Innovations and Support and Process Monitoring) that interacts with each group in order to provide support, advice and solutions for each team to have everything it needs to carry out its tasks.
The Recovery Software system was consolidated to include the totality of Retail Banking Management. This comprises the online management of external collection agencies, automation of the accounting process for recoveries and the implementation of the judicial module for pledges and attachments. This made it possible to use only one application that integrates the whole history of the client, the management of credits, registering all the history of actions concerning a certain client, from the origination of the credit to its passing through stages of potential default, early default and late default, including any possible judicial procedures and up to a final resolution.
Finally, in 2016 we aim to integrate distressed companies and bankruptcy proceedings in this application.
Control and Reporting Units
The control and monitoring areas are responsible for giving coherence to the management of credit risk and ensuring that the management of risks that are critical for the Bank, Financial Risks and Operational Risks, is conducted according to the established standards.
This control stage is the one that completes the Comprehensive Risk Management Model.
Financial Risks
The management of financial risks is in line with the basic principles of Basel’s Banking Supervision Committee and operates a comprehensive process that identifies, measures, monitors and controls all relevant risks, which include:
To this effect, the structure consists of an orderly set of policies and organization, management, measurement, limits, information and control systems. Compliance with these policies is mandatory throughout BBVA Francés, and they involve, apart from the central bodies and units, all business units where the financial risk is originated.
Market Risks
Market risk is defined as the possibility of suffering losses in the value of a portfolio as a result of adverse changes in market prices.
Market risk applies to the Bank´s current trading portfolio which includes the following instruments:
The structure of measurement and control of the market risk includes a scheme of limits and alerts in terms of Economic Capital (CeR), VaR (Value at Risk), Stress, monthly and annual Stop Loss and internal sub-limits.
58
VaR is the main metrics used. This measurement estimates the maximum loss with a confidence level of 99% that may occur on the market positions within one day.
The average VaR for 2015 was Ps.11,99 million. After the December 17, 2015 devaluation, the exchange rate volatility increased and made an impact on risk estimates.
The total VaR consists of two risk factors, VaR interest and VaR FX, which averaged Ps.8.4 million and Ps.6.6 million respectively in 2015.
Counterparty Risk
Counterparty Risk is understood as the loss that would result from the default of a counterparty, given a certain confidence level, from the present time to the expiration of all transactions with that counterparty
The products where such risk exists are:
This risk is dependent on:
At the end of the year, the counterparty risk amounted to Ps.693 million, basically consisting of exchange rate futures and forwards.
Assessment
The Market Risks area is responsible for making a prudent assessment at market prices of the financial instruments, a process that involves the identification, evaluation, monitoring, control and mitigation of market risks.
Automatic systems are used to find out and publish on a daily basis those market prices and variables that have an impact on the Bank’s portfolios and on the clients’ holdings under management.
In determining prices, priority is given to the use of market information. If this is not possible, then the assessment is made by applying internal valuation models. For fixed-income transactions in the Bank’s portfolio, the valuation is based on calculating the present value of expected flows, using market yield curves for discount purposes.
Liquidity and Financing Risk
BBVA Francés has developed a liquidity and financing risk management system, one of whose components is a general risk-appetite framework that expresses the levels and types of risk it is prepared to assume in order to carry out the strategic plan without any significant deviations, including under stress situations, and also a corporate management scheme that includes the planning of risks on an annual basis, and a set of corporate control and management policies developed for application in the different business units.
Among the core metrics, the following stand out:
59
stable clients is key in order to preserve a solid liquidity profile. During 2015 this ratio remained at low to moderate levels, in line with our risk appetite.
With respect to regulatory ratios, the LCR (Liquidity Coverage Ratio), defined by Basel and incorporated by the BCRA, measures the relationship between high-quality liquid assets and total net cash outflows during a period of 30 days. BBVA Francés has internalized this metric and in 2015 it exceeded the Basel requirements. Likewise, in the course of 2015, quarterly liquidity monitoring reports were implemented, as required by the BCRA, as additional liquidity monitoring metrics.
Interest Rate Risk
The management of balance-sheet interest risk seeks to maintain the exposure of BBVA Francés at levels according to the risk-appetite profile validated by the Board of Directors in the face of market interest rate variations.
To this effect, the Executive Committee as well as the Management Committee and the Assets and Liabilities Committee (COAP) perform an active management of the balance-sheet in agreement with the guidelines approved by the Board of Directors.
Financial Margin Sensibility (FMS)
Financial Margin Sensibility measures the change in expected accruals for a certain period (12 months) in case of a displacement in the 100-basis-point interest rate curve.
The calculation of financial margin sensibility is made by simulation, be it for a scenario of movement in the interest-rate curve as well as for the present situation, the sensibility being defined as the difference between both calculated margins. The SMF average consumption for 2015 was below 1% of the projected financial margin for 12 months.
Economic Capital
During 2015 the Bank prepared the Self-Evaluated Capital Report (IAC) as per Communication “A” 5515 of the BCRA (Section V).
Economic capital is an instrument to measure in a homogenous way the different risks assumed by BBVA Francés. It consists of an estimate of the unexpected losses it may be exposed to in its different risk activities. Therefore, the goal is to determine what capital or resources we would need in order to be able to support such losses.
Capital calculation methodologies for the following risks are defined as per the guidelines set forth in Basel II.5:
Distribution of the economic capital by type of risks:
60
Stress Tests
A stress test is defined as the evaluation of a financial position in a severely adverse –but possible– scenario.
In this connection, stress tests are divided into retail and comprehensive according to their scope of application. The purpose of the former is to measure the impact of an adverse scenario at the retail level by risk type. The latter try to quantify impacts at the aggregate level for unfavorable scenarios in terms of the balance sheet, the income statement, the statement of cash flow and the capital requirements associated with a certain hypothetical stress situation.
According to the results of each of these tests, a process of analysis and decision-making is generated in order to place the Bank’s action lines in line with the desirable risk level.
The stress tests are oriented to:
In all stressed risks the results have been satisfactory and confirm the capacity of BBVA Francés to face adverse situations in severe scenarios.
Also, stress tests at BBVA Francés are applied individually to each of the following risks:
Credit risk is associated with non-compliance by loan borrowers with the terms of the loan. The concept of credit crisis is associated with the existence of large number of borrowers in default, likely to be in default or with a high probability of being in default for reasons relating to a worsening economy.
BBVA Frances is currently adapting its methodology based on econometric models and sensibilities that are more adjusted to the Argentine economy.
Through a combined analysis of sensibilities and scenarios, the Bank may determine the impact of an adverse macroeconomic scenario on non-performing loans and credit losses, all of these being measured by the line item “Allowances for loan losses” in the financial statements.
Finally, several stress tests were conducted for different projected scenarios of the Argentine economy over a year (both positive and negative GDP variations).
The stress tests by market risk are based on both historical and simulated scenarios, and their purpose is to quantify through the VaR what is the maximum loss that can be generated in the Global Market portfolio, thus determining stress scenarios.
In this connection, the stress tests based on historical scenarios seek to measure the VaR for the current position with historical volatilities at identified moments where an important stress has affected the market. At BBVA Francés, this market stress moment used for stressing the VaR is the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy in 2008 and the maximum volatility brought about by the nationalization of the A.F.J.P.’s at local level.
61
On the other hand, stress tests based on simulations (Resampling) are also conducted. This methodology of calculation for stress scenarios is based on Monte Carlo simulations for obtaining random curves associated to risk factors having an impact on the treasury’s portfolio. These are dynamic scenarios which are recalculated on a monthly basis.
Through the interest rate stress test an evaluation is made of the exposure in the face of abnormal market variations based on historical situations or estimates of scenarios with a very low degree of probability. Stress scenarios must register not only changes in the market interest rate curves but also in the assumptions and hypotheses of the structural interest risk measurement model.
Therefore, the structural interest rate stress tests are based on stressing the economic capital by taking a simulation of 105 scenarios estimated on the curves of November 2008, when the Lehman Brothers crisis coincided with the impact of the A.F.J.P. nationalization.
Liquidity Stress
The analysis conducted is focused on high-impact but low-probability scenarios, in an attempt to foresee possible crisis situations, both internal or market-generated, that might arise at the Bank some time into the future, and to project indicators and metrics under these hypotheses.
Stress tests are developed in three scenarios: systemic crisis, internal crisis involving a sensible decrease of the credit rating and/or affecting our capacity to issue securities in wholesale markets and the business risk perception by the our banking intermediaries and clients; and a mixed scenario, such as a combination of the two mentioned above.
In the case of liquidity stress exercises, the most severe scenario would be the combination of internal and systemic crises. The test results for 2015 show that even in such scenario the financing structure remains stable, maintaining liquidity positions which cover the greatest liquidity gap and resist deposit losses of up to 17%.
Comprehensive Stress
In compliance with Communication “A” 5515 of the BCRA (Section IV) stress tests at the retail and consolidated levels were conducted to measure the impact of adverse macroeconomic scenarios based on GDP projections and real interest rates, among other relevant economic variables affecting the balance sheet, the income statement, the statement of cash flow and the capital requirements.
During 2015, BBVA Francés started a procedure to improve comprehensive stress, recalibrating the econometric models. The new development has permitted to analyze different scenarios and their impact in both equity accounts and income statements and in key indicators (liquidity ratio, solvency).
Technical and Reporting Secretariat
This area performs the procedures to control the technical ratios for graduation and fractioning of the risk, the provisioning and the determination of risk quotas per segment of economic activity and per type of financing.
It is responsible for the management of risks committees, the analysis of regulations and the coordination of audits.
It is also in charge of preparing and monitoring the department’s budget, comparing actual monthly values and their impact on the cost of arrears. This activity is essential to determine compliance with quality standards regarding credit risks, which is the goal of all risks units of Banco Francés.
This area includes a reporting unit whose function is to generate reports for the Risks Department to make decisions in compliance with our internal policies and with applicable laws and regulations, as well as to revise all processes and propose improvements. These reports are focused on an appropriate analysis of credit risk management in the different stages of identification, evaluation and monitoring.
Some of the areas addressed by our studies include the distribution of risks per economic sector, the evaluation of clients both internally and within the financial system, the monitoring of non-performing debtors and any significant increases in their number, statistics related to risk approvals, benchmarking reports, generation of tools to identify the best risks to be assumed, use of approved risk limits and evaluation of the different campaigns launched by the Bank.
62
All measurement, monitoring and control activities of relevance are presented to and analyzed by the “Risk Management Committee” and the “Technical Committee of Local Operations”, and then sent to the Board of Directors and the Management Committee.
Validation, Internal Control and Management of the Country’s Operational Risk
Finally the Risks Direction, in accordance with international standards and Central Bank regulations, operates the “Validation, Internal Control and Management of Operational Risk at Country Level” area, whose task is to ensure an updated, homogenous and appropriate control of the environment in all units of the Bank.
Validation is the area in charge of making sure that the internal risk models of BBVA Francés are appropriate for use in the management of risks, and it must issue a thorough, fact-based, and up-to-date opinion on the proper use of internal management models.
BBVA Francés has implemented a model named “Operational Risk and Internal Control” which is based on a scheme of internal control specialists and operational risk managers working on the different business areas and covering the whole life cycle of the operational risk which involves admission, monitoring and mitigation.
Said model identifies the organization’s operational processes and all the operational risks they are exposed to. Through this methodology each of the risks are evaluated and assigned a priority and a critical degree so that they can be managed and mitigated, if applicable.
For purposes of monitoring and mitigation, the Bank has an application that permits the mapping and evaluation of all operational risks, as well as the tracking of any detected weaknesses. It contemplates processes, risks, controls, weaknesses and their respective action plans. It also has a database where all cases of loss due to operational risk are registered.
We believe our Risk Management Model is comprehensive, robust, in line with international standards, up-to-date and capable of adaptation to the environment and to any necessary internal requirements.
Loans by Economic Activity
The table below analyzes our loan portfolio according to the borrowers’ main economic activity as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013. Where appropriate, personal loans are allocated to the economic activity of the borrower. Loans are stated before deduction of the allowance for loan losses.
63
Maturity Composition of the Loan Portfolio
The following table analyzes our loan portfolio as of December 31, 2015 by type and by the time remaining to maturity. Loans are stated before deduction of the allowance for loan losses. We expect most loans to be repaid at maturity in cash or through refinancing at market terms.
64
Interest Rate Sensitivity of Outstanding Loans as of December 31, 2015
The following table analyzes, by currency of denomination, the interest rate sensitivity of our loan portfolio as of December 31, 2015. Loans are stated before deduction of the allowance for loan losses.
The following table sets forth a breakdown of our fixed and variable rate loans which have a maturity of one year or more at December 31, 2015.
Allowance for Loan Losses and Loan Loss Experience
BBVA Francés classifies its borrowers in accordance with the regulations of the Central Bank, its primary bank regulator, and not in the manner established by the SEC. As a result, BBVA Francés does not keep records classifying loans as “non-accrual”, “past due”, “restructured” and “potential problem loans”, as those terms are defined by the SEC.
Classification System According to Central Bank Regulations
The Central Bank establishes guidelines for classifying debtors from the point of view of their credit quality and compliance with their commitments, according to the evaluation performed for that purpose by the financial institution, criteria that are applied by the Bank.
65
Commercial Loans
Consumer or Housing Loans
Arrears
Payment capacity evaluation based on the borrower’s income will not be mandatory, as long as specific evaluation methods are used or the borrowers’ loans are for minimal amounts in terms of point 1.1.3.3, Section 1 of the “Credit Management” rules of the BCRA.
66
Re-appraisal must be immediate in the case of clients with debts totaling 1% or more of the financial institution’s RC or the equivalent to $4,000,000, whichever is lower.
One-level discrepancy is allowed in relation to the information submitted by financial institutions to the Credit Information Data Base. If there is a greater discrepancy between the rating of the bank and the lower classification awarded by at least two other banks, and total loans from such banks account for 40% or more of the total informed, the bank will be required to reclassify the debtor to at least the level immediately above that registering the highest level of indebtedness with the comparison institutions.
In a normal situation, up to two refinancings are allowed for the last twelve months with arrears of less than 31 days. Counting starts as of the date of the last refinancing. For all other situations, the basic criterion is that the greatest penalty must be applied to the borrower who delays the refinancing, for which reason:
Table (i) – Enhanced situation by the payment of quotas. Consumer portfolio. The following table applies (*)
from Irrecoverable
from High Risk
from Medium Risk
from Low Risk
(*) The refinancing requires a punctual payment or with delays of not more than 31 days according to the German or French Amortization System. Regularity may be monthly or bimonthly.
Table (ii) – Enhanced situation by cancellation percentage of capital. Consumer and commercial portfolios (**)
(**) For amortization systems with periods greater than bimonthly or irregular.
67
The choice must be for a single parameter depending on the refinancing mode:
Collections are not applied and rebates may not be counted in order to improve the situation (they belong to the debt preceding the signing of the Refinancing Agreement), so no quantification was made. Such treatment is consistent with U.S. GAAP.
Up-front payments may be computed as per their equivalent in installments or amortization percentage in order to improve borrower’s situation.
Arrears are considered to exist in refinancing if a delay exceeding 31 days occurs.
The criteria determining the situation of a refinanced client are as follows:
Situation
Minimum delay time (in days)
The following minimum provisioning levels are to be applied on total debt:
With preferred collateral “A” (1)
With preferred collateral “B” (2)
Banks are required to establish provisions equal to 100% of any interest accrued on loans to borrowers classified as “Problem” or lower or “Medium Risk” or lower. The Bank chooses to interrupt interest accrual accounting as permitted by the regulation.
68
By Communication “A” 4683 the BCRA introduced the possibility for debtors of the Consumer and Consumer-like Portfolio to be assigned a percentage above the minimum estimate for the situation without having to be automatically reclassified to the next category. BBVA Francés has used this possibility further supported by the regulations.
The main criterion is based on the provisions of point 7.1, third paragraph of the Borrower Rating Standard and Minimum Bad Debt Provisions. More stringent criteria may be adopted on the basis of the objective guidelines mentioned in the first paragraph of the same point, provided this constitutes a generally applied policy which must be duly detailed in the “Rating and Provision Procedures Manual”, without this affecting the rating that must be allocated to eligible borrowers as provided hereunder, and provided this is duly grounded on objective criteria based on behavioral studies that give support to the higher provisions (be it for the active portfolio as a whole or by type of financing). In accordance with the regulations in force, we apply provision percentages above the established minimum.
The reference framework of the policy in force for the management of provisions by BBVA Francés sets forth two control levels:
Two basic references when it comes to the management of provisions are, on the one hand, compliance with the regulatory requirements on minimum capitals and non-performance provisions; and, on the other hand, the Bank’s capital ratio. BBVA Francés will at all times comply with the regulatory requirements on minimum capital and non-performance provisions. Therefore, both values per se determine a lower limit for the management of provisions. Likewise, a second lower limit is established for the management of provisions, and that is the capital ratio. In this connection, it is established that any disablement of provisions may only take place if the capital ratio is 10.5% or higher, defined as the Computable Equity Liability (“CEL”) divided by the Risk-Weighted Assets (“RWA”).
In order to provide for the Bank an appropriate level of provisions, the behavior of the Bank’s main credit portfolio indicators will be monitored on a regular basis.
At least the following portfolio behavior indicators will be analyzed:
Absolute variations (increases and decreases) for these indicators and their tendencies will be analyzed, considering the last 12 months prior to the lowest month under analysis.
This procedure also requires authorization by the same member officers who are responsible for approving the “Significant Financings” (those exceeding 2.5% of the entity’s RPC), for which reason it was discussed and confirmed by our Technical Committee of Operations (currently the Risk Management Committee) and validated by our board of directors.
The main destination of these allowances is to generate coverage for expectations of arrears and an estimation of possible losses per portfolio and per type of financing in our entity.
Considering the applicable coverage and their regular revision and after a qualitative analysis of the environment, decisions are made as to whether the policy of allowances should be maintained or modified.
BBVA Francés has resolved to modify the allowance percentages applied for the Commercial, Consumer and Consumer-like Portfolios, as detailed below:
69
(*) In the event of clients classified under the current situations by the mandatory reclassification process, the applicable provision percentage will be 95%.
70
(*)This Policy will be applicable except as authorized by the Companies and Wholesale Banking Monitoring Committee.
(**) In the event of clients classified under the current situations by the mandatory reclassification process, the applicable provision percentage will be 95%.
71
The following table presents our loan portfolio, before the deduction for the allowance for loan losses, using the classification system of the Central Bank in effect at the end of each fiscal year:
72
Classification of Loan Portfolio
The following table presents our consumer and commercial loan portfolio as of December 31, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012 and 2011 under the classification system of the Central Bank, before the deduction of the allowance for loan losses:
73
Non-performing and Restructured Loans
Applying the Central Bank’s loan classification criteria described above, the following table analyzes at each of the dates indicated below our gross non-performing and restructured loan portfolio, and further breaks down the total into loans with preferred guarantees and those which are unsecured:
74
The table below sets forth non-performing loans by economic activity as of each of the dates indicated:
As of December 31, 2015, the majority of our loan portfolio, and non-performing and restructured loan portfolio, consisted of loans to Argentine borrowers. At that date, approximately Ps.82.9 million, or 0.14% of our total loan portfolio, consisted of loans to foreign borrowers.
Gross interest income that would have been recorded on non-performing loans during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012 and 2011 amounted to Ps.15.2 million, Ps.17.4 million, Ps.29.8 million, Ps.25.5 million and Ps.24.7 million, respectively.
75
Analysis of the Allowance for Loan Losses
The table below sets forth the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012 and 2011. See Note 24.5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. In conformity with Central Bank requirements, we charge-off non-performing loans when we believe that recovery is unlikely and, in any event, no later than seven months after a loan has been classified as “irrecoverable” without preferred guarantees. We continue to try to collect all amounts past due, even if they have been charged-off, if we believe that the likelihood of collecting such amounts justifies the commitment of resources to do so.
Allocation of the Allowance for Loan Losses
The following table allocates the allowance for loan losses and sets forth the percentage distribution by each category of loans in the total loan portfolio (principals only) for each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012 and 2011.
76
Composition of Deposits
The following table sets out the composition of each category of deposits that exceeded 10% of average total deposits in each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.
Maturity of Deposits at December 31, 2015
The following table sets forth information regarding the maturity of our deposits at December 31, 2015.
77
The following table sets forth information regarding the maturity of our certificates of deposit and other time deposits in denominations of US$100,000 or more at December 31, 2015.
Return on Equity and Assets
The following table presents certain selected financial information and ratios of BBVA Francés for the fiscal years indicated.
Short-Term Borrowings
Our short-term borrowings, which equaled or exceeded 30% of stockholders’ equity, totaled approximately Ps.13.9 billion, Ps.8.2 billion and Ps.4.1 billion for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The table below shows those amounts at the end of each fiscal year.
78
F. THE ARGENTINE BANKING SYSTEM AND ITS REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
Argentine Banking System
On December 31, 2015, Argentina’s banking system consisted of 62 commercial banks, of which 13 were government-owned or government-related banks and 49 were privately owned banks. The principal regulators of financial institutions in Argentina are the Central Bank, the Superintendencia de Entidades Financieras y Cambiarias (the Superintendency of Financial Institutions and Exchanges, referred to as the “Superintendency”) and, in the case of financial institutions that publicly offer their own securities in Argentina or otherwise engage in the offering or trading of third parties’ securities in Argentina, the CNV.
Private Sector Banks
According to information published by the Central Bank, on December 31, 2015, the largest privately owned locally based commercial banks, in terms of total assets, were the following: Banco Santander Río S.A., Banco de Galicia y Buenos Aires S.A., BBVA Francés, Banco Macro S.A. and HSBC Bank Argentina. Some of these banks, including BBVA Francés, have one or more significant foreign investors. Similarly, private financial institutions accounted for approximately 54.91% of deposits and approximately 61.34% of gross loans in the Argentine financial system. In addition, the ten largest private financial institutions accounted for 43.83% of all deposits and 49.33% of all loans in the Argentine financial system. Foreign banks compete under the same regulatory conditions as Argentine banks.
Public Sector Banks
The principal state owned banks are: Banco de la Nación Argentina, Banco de la Provincia de Buenos Aires and Banco de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. As of December 31, 2015, based on the available data of the Central Bank, such entities accounted for approximately 39.79% of deposits and approximately 31.21% of gross loans in the Argentine banking system.
Under the provisions of the Argentine financial institutions Law No. 21,526 (the “Financial Institutions Law”), government owned or government-related banks and private banks have comparable rights and obligations except that the former have the sole right and obligation to handle public revenues and promote regional development. Government-owned banks are required to meet the credit needs of public sector entities. Moreover, the by-laws of some government-owned banks, which include federal, provincial and locally owned banks, require that the principalities which own them guarantee their commitments.
Central Bank
The Financial Institutions Law regulates banking activities in Argentina and places the supervision and control of the Argentine banking system in the hands of the Central Bank, an autonomous institution. The Financial Institutions Law provides the Central Bank with broad access to the accounting systems, books, correspondence, documents and other papers of banking institutions. The Central Bank regulates the provision of credit and supervises the liquidity and the general operation of the Argentine financial markets. The Central Bank enforces the Financial Institutions Law and authorizes banks to operate in Argentina. Since an amendment to the final institutions Law of February 1994, there is no distinction between locally owned and foreign owned private financial institutions
The Central Bank establishes “technical ratios” to limit the levels of indebtedness, liquidity, maximum credit that may be granted per customer and foreign exchange assets and liabilities positions, among others. The Central Bank carries out formal inspections from time to time of all banking institutions to monitor their compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The Central Bank supervises banks on a consolidated basis. It has a supervision department of internal and external auditors of financial institutions that evaluate performance comprehensively in internal audit areas as well as firms and professionals working as external auditors of financial institutions. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—The Argentine Banking System and its Regulatory Framework—BASIC System” below. If a bank does not comply with the technical ratios, it must explain such noncompliance to the Central Bank. There are specific regulations governing reinstatement plans and other measures arising from the failure of these plans. Furthermore, the Central Bank has the power to impose sanctions for noncompliance, which vary from a strong reprimand to revocation of banking licenses.
The Central Bank requires banks to submit information to it on a daily, monthly, quarterly, semiannual and annual basis. These reports contain, among other important information, balance sheets and income statements, information relating to reserve funds, use of deposits and indicators on portfolio quality, including details on principal debtors and any loan-loss provisions established. The reports are designed to allow the Central Bank to monitor the banks’ business practices. If the Central Bank’s rules are breached, various sanctions may be imposed depending on the gravity of the violation, ranging from calling attention to the infraction to the imposition of fines or even the revocation of a bank’s operating license. Moreover, noncompliance with certain rules may result in the
79
obligatory presentation to the Central Bank of specific capital adequacy or regularization plans. These plans must be approved by the Central Bank for a bank to maintain its license.
Law No. 25,780 introduced amendments to the Financial Institutions Law Corporate and the Central Bank charter. Among the most significant of such modifications are the following:
Amendments to the Central Bank’s Charter and the Convertibility Law
Law No. 26,739 amended the functions and powers of the Central Bank, and the ability of the Federal government to obtain financing from the Central Bank.
On March 28, 2012, Law No. 26,739 was published in the Official Gazette amending the charter of the Central Bank (as amended, the “Charter”) of the Argentine Republic, which had been previously approved by Law No. 24,144 and the Convertibility Law.
The amendments introduced by Law No. 26,739 may be grouped in two main topics: (i) amendments to the functions and powers of the Central Bank as the regulatory and supervisory authority of the financial system; and (ii) expansion of the Federal government’s access to financing from the Central Bank.
80
81
Supervision on a Consolidated Basis
The Argentine financial entities are subject to supervision in consolidated form by the Central Bank (irrespective of the observance on an individual basis of the regulations applicable thereto). In other words, the financial statements and other information regarding them must reflect the transactions of their head office as well as those of their branches in the country and abroad, and those of any local and foreign “significant subsidiaries”. Consequently, the requirements as to liquidity, solvency, minimum capital, risk concentration, and provisions for loan losses, among others, must be calculated on a consolidated basis.
From the above-mentioned communication it is clear that the financial institutions must submit certain information to the Central Bank, including the following:
For the purposes of these regulations:
The possession or control by the financial entity is considered indirect if exercised through another legal person, its controlling shareholders or directors appointed by such controlling shareholders or persons linked to them, in control of more than 50% –measured as a whole– of the total votes of any instrument with voting rights in another entity or company. Also considered indirect is any other form of control or interest where, in the opinion of the Superintendency, and even if the shareholders’ interest does not exceed 50%, a situation of control, and therefore the subsidiary character of an entity or company is configured or can be inferred from the evidence collected.
Legal Reserve
The Central Bank requires that on an annual basis banks allocate a certain percentage of their net income, set by the Central Bank, to a legal reserve which is currently set at 20%. This reserve can only be used during periods in which a bank has incurred losses and has exhausted all unappropriated retained earnings and other reserves on profit. Banks may not pay dividends if the legal
82
reserve has been impaired. However when the Legal Reserve is used to absorb losses, profits may be distributed if the balance prior to absorption were greater than 20% of the corporate capital plus capital adjustment, once this last amount is achieved.
Reserve Requirements and Liquidity Requirements
The minimum cash system determines what portion of their deposits or obligations the entities must keep available, that is to say, not as part of their lending capacity. The minimum cash requirement is calculated on the monthly average of daily balances for comprised obligations as recorded at the close of each calendar month, and must be observed separately for each currency of denomination and/or government securities and instruments issued by the BCRA of the comprised obligations. Compliance must take place in the same currency of the requirement, except in the event of sight obligations for transfers from abroad in foreign currencies other than the U.S. dollar which must be accounted for in this currency, making use of one of the following:
As of April 1, 2012, cash and cash equivalents in pesos and foreign currencies are not considered as minimum cash payments.
Cash and cash equivalents in foreign currencies will be considered as a lesser shortfall in the application of resources in foreign currencies, without exceeding such shortfall.
The requirement will be reduced according to the participation of the financing in pesos granted to MiPyMEs in the total financing in pesos for the non-financial private sector, as indicated in the table below:
Participation of the financing to MiPyMEs in the total financing granted by the entity to the non-financial private sector. In %
Deduction (on the total of items included in pesos). In %
The requirement in pesos will be reduced depending on cash withdrawals made through ATMs of the Bank applying a formula which will be considered if they are in operating branches of the entity or outside them and that they are of use to the public, considering three categories depending on geographic location and that have been accessible to the public for at least ten hours a day.
83
The requirement in pesos will be reduced from March 1, 2014 by an amount equivalent to 16% of the monthly average of the financing granted to MiPyMEs from January 1, 2014, as provided in the rules on the “Line of credit for productive investment” and verifying that the time period for such loans at the time of its execution exceeding 5 years without its average maturity is less than 30 months.
The requirement in pesos will be reduced from September 2014 depending on the accreditations delivered by the National Social Security Administration (“ANSES”) for the payment of social security benefits.
Depending on the granting of loans under the program “AHORA 12” requirement in pesos will be reduced from October 2014 in an amount equivalent to 16% of the sum of financings in pesos.
Decreased demand in average dollar, effective for the deposits collected from January 27, 2014. Prior to determining the requirement, shall be deducted from the application base, monthly average daily balances of net position in LEBAC-denominated dollar that record the financial institution. Pursuant to Communication “A” 5859 of the BCRA, as from December 22, 2015 any financial institution may also deduce the monthly average of daily balances from the net position in NOBAC in U.S. dollars. In addition, through Communication “A” 5893, the BCRA rendered ineffective, for deposits created after February 2016, the decrease of the average requirement in U.S. dollars for fixed-term deposits.
Likewise, in case of an excessive concentration of liabilities (in holders and/or terms), which implies a significant risk on the financial entity’s liquidity and/or an important negative effect on the system’s liquidity, additional minimum cash requirements may be imposed on the affected liabilities of the financial entity and/or any other measures considered relevant.
The balances of cash accounts opened with the Central Bank as eligible for cash integrations were only compensated up to the amounts corresponding to the legal requirements for forward transactions with no remuneration for any reserve in excess of those requirements.
The Central Bank sets forth the application of different requirements for deposits in pesos as opposed to foreign currencies.
The following schedule indicates the minimum cash requirements for each type of account. In the case of transactions in pesos, the minimum cash requirements will depend on the category assigned to the location of the operating office where the deposit was made:
84
In addition to the above mentioned requirements, the following requirement must be observed:
Lending Capacity Provided by Deposits in Foreign Currency
The lending capacity provided by deposits denominated in foreign currency must be applied in the denomination of the currency of the deposits. This includes those deposits denominated in dollars and payable in pesos and applies to the following purposes:
85
It also includes transactions to finance suppliers of services directly used in the process of exporting goods.
It comprises those transactions where financing is granted via the Bank’s participation in “syndicated loans”, be they with local or foreign entities.
The lending capacity will result from the sum of all deposits in foreign currency plus all inter-financial loans received originated in the lending capacity for this type of deposit, after deduction of the minimum reserve requirements applicable to deposits.
Any deficiencies in the application of foreign currency lending capacity, net of a portion of: (i) cash balances, (ii) cash under custody in other financial entities, (iii) cash in transit and (iv) cash with armored car transport companies (not computed as integration of the minimum cash exigency for application of the existing limit), requires an equivalent increase in the minimum cash requirement.
Limitations on Types of Business
Argentine commercial banks may conduct all activities and operations that are not specifically prohibited by law or by regulations of the Central Bank. Banks are permitted, among other things, to:
86
According to the Financial Institutions Law, banks in Argentina are prohibited from investing in commercial, industrial or agricultural entities, or other entities without the express authorization of the Central Bank. The Central Bank may then impose conditions and limits to guarantee the safety and soundness of the financial institutions.
These limitations include:
Notwithstanding the foregoing, banks may own shares in other financial institutions with prior approval of the Central Bank and in public service companies if necessary to obtain those services.
Capital Adequacy Requirements
Basel Accord
In July 1988, the Basel Committee on Banking Regulations and Supervisory Practices (the “Basel Committee” or “BCBS”), which includes the supervisory authorities of twelve major industrial countries, adopted an international framework (the “Basel Accord”) for capital measurement and capital standards of banking institutions.
In 2007 the Central Bank published its road map for the implementation of the capital adequacy requirements contained in the document “International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards”, issued by the Basel Committee and known as Basel II. The first stages were carried out as planned: publication of best practices for risk management, seminars, review of supervision processes on the basis of the best practices being encouraged by the BCBS, analysis of the areas subject to “national discretion” in the calculation of regulatory capital, and publication of the text “Guidelines for Operational Risk Management in Financial Institutions”.
Following the sub-prime lending crisis that spread in 2008 and 2009, the BCBS published in December 2010 a set of measures known as Basel III, designed to increase the capacity of the system to absorb shocks from stress situations and improve risk management and the transparency of bank disclosures.
Basel III incorporates the terms of Basel II, contained in three “pillars”:
Since the introduction of Basel I, financial institutions must keep an amount of total capital not less than 8% of their risk weighted assets. Items going towards compliance with this capital requirement are classified in two groups:
87
According to Basel II, at least half of the capital requirement should be composed of core capital, preferably common equity, a category that includes both common shares and retained earnings.
Had the Basel Accord been applied to us at December 31, 2014, our Total Capital would have been approximately 1.42 times the minimum required.
Basel III establishes more demanding requirements, as banks must comply with three minimum ratios in relation to their risk-weighted assets:
These new capital composition requirements help ensure that there will be greater capacity to absorb losses in stress situations.
The so-called capital conservation buffer imposes an additional capital requirement equivalent to 2.5% of risk-weighted assets that must be satisfied by common equity. Its purpose is to be able to count on sufficient reserves to absorb additional losses generated at times of economic and financial stress. In fiscal years in which the common equity is less than 7% of risk-weighted assets (the 4.5% base requirement plus the new conservation buffer), rising constraints are established for financial institutions, that will not be able to pay dividends, award discretionary bonuses or perform share buybacks.
The goal of the countercyclical capital buffer is to offset the procyclical nature of the financial system. In times of exceptional credit growth at aggregate level, financial institutions will be required to boost the level of their common equity by up to 2.5% of risk-weighted assets.
Basel III complements risk weighted asset capital requirements with a limit on total leverage. This limit, known as the leverage ratio, is the ratio between core capital (Tier 1) and total assets without risk weighting, both on and off balance sheet, plus derivatives. At the international level, this ratio has initially been set at 3%. In Argentina, financial institutions record a leverage lower than the proposed maximum. Although Basel II establishes a capital requirement for the market risk generated by foreign currency positions, no cap is placed on them. On the other hand, Basel III introduces a limit through the leverage ratio, set in relation to total exposure regardless of the currency in which the assets are stated. Argentine regulations limit direct exposure to currency risk. Furthermore, with the aim of preventing the indirect exposure generated by the granting of loans denominated in foreign currency to agents whose income is in pesos, regulations in Argentina only allow funds obtained from deposits in foreign currency to be lent to customers who generate income in the same currency.
The reforms introduced by Basel III have two main objectives. One is; to ensure that individual banks can show resilience in periods of stress, known as “microprudential”; and the other one, complementary and broader, to discourage the building up of risks across the banking sector, as well as their procyclical amplification, is known as “macroprudential”.
As part of its “macroprudential” policy, Argentina has introduced a mandatory 30% reserve requirement on short-term funds from abroad that are not intended for direct investment.
The LCR is based on the methodologies used by international banks. It will be calibrated so that financial institutions can tolerate stress scenarios over a thirty-day period. Once again, requirements in force for our own financial system are stricter than those established by the international standard.
88
The NSFR will be calibrated on the basis of long-term liquidity and structural mismatching in the composition of sources of funding. The design of the NSFR is based on net liquid assets and liquid capital methodologies used by internationally active banks. Banks should hold sufficient stable sources of funding (net worth and long-term liabilities) to fund the proportion of their assets that they cannot monetize within a term of one year.
The Financial Stability Board (“FSB”) and the BCBS are working on the design of an appropriate regulatory framework for global systemically important financial institutions (G-SIFIs). Alternatives being evaluated include setting more demanding capital requirements than those foreseen by Basel III.
In line with the commitments assumed, the BCRA has been working on the implementation of the terms of Basel III, adapting them to take into account the particular conditions in emerging countries, experience gained from the financial and banking crises suffered by Argentina, the characteristics of our financial system and current legislation.
In May 2011 the BCRA resumed its preparatory work for the implementation of Basel II. The stages already completed were supplemented by Communication “A” 5203 containing the “Guidelines for Risk Management in Financial Institutions” and by systemic impact tests related to the adoption of standardized approaches for the calculation of credit and operational risk capital requirements.
Publication of Internal Adequacy Assessment Process standards and Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process pilot tests will take place as from 2013, the year in which the implementation of the Basel III will start unless the international agenda is modified. These activities will be additional to the observation and supervision of leverage and liquidity that should be carried out during the rest of this year and next year.
Central Bank Rules
Under the Financial Institutions Law, Argentine financial institutions must comply at all times with the minimum capital requirements described by the Central Bank. In July 1991, the Central Bank amended its minimum capital adequacy rules to follow those recommended by the Basel Committee more closely.
As of February 1, 2013, by Communication “A” 5369 of the BCRA, Minimum Capital shall be equal to Total Capital (Basic Net Equity plus Complementary Net Equity) or RPC, as per Central Bank’s denomination.
Basic Net Equity includes:
89
Less: certain deductible items.
“Complementary Net Equity” includes:
Minimum limits are also established to be observed by the Ordinary Capital Level 1, the Basic Net Equity and the Minimum Capital. Those limits will be 4.5%, 6% and 8% of the risk-weighted assets, respectively. Noncompliance with these minimum levels will be considered as noncompliance with the minimum capital payment.
Minimum Capital must be, at least, the greater of:
Differential requirements were established for banks and other financial entities, mainly based on the area where their head offices are located, in order to benefit those areas with smaller banking coverage according to Central Bank criteria, which now enjoy less stringent requirements with respect to minimum basic capital. In addition, those banks which act as custodians and/or registration agents of securities representing the investments of the retirement and pension funds and/or as registration agents for registered mortgage letters must certify a minimum capital equal to or above the greater of Ps.400 million or the equivalent of 1% of the securities under custody (in the case of mortgage letters, considering the net value of any amortizations effected).
As of January 1, 2013, by Communication “A” 5369 of the BCRA, the Minimum Capital Requirement for Credit Risk will be determined as the summation of:
The risk-weighters table is reformulated with new items and weighters, and with a new scheme. A summary of them will include, among others:
90
The sum of (a), (b) and (c) will be multiplied by a coefficient which varies from 1 to 1.19 based on the rating the entity is granted by the Superintendence.
Whatever excesses incurred by noncompliance with other technical regulations must be added to the credit risk requirement.
Likewise, any increase by expansion of the general limit for global negative net position in foreign currency must be added to the credit risk requirement.
It is resolved, effective until December 2013, that if by application of Communication “A” 5369, there should result a requirement that is lesser than that determined for its payment as at January 1, 2013, then the financial entity must compute the latter and apply the difference to the following month in which this situation is observed for the destinations detailed below, in succession and according to the indicated order of priorities:
Minimum Capital Requirement for Market Risk: the Central Bank implemented, effective from September 1, 1996, additional minimum capital requirements in relation to market risk associated with positions held by financial institutions in “local assets”, “foreign assets”, “foreign currency” and “gold”, including derivatives bought or sold on such positions.
“Local Assets” include:
“Foreign Assets” are defined to include:
91
The positions under consideration must be separated according to the currency of issue of each instrument, regardless of the issuer’s residence. In the cases of assets expressed in foreign currency, the entity must consider the risk for two positions: that which corresponds to the assets and the position in foreign currency, the relevant capital requirement being determined on the basis of the latter. The value of all positions will be expressed in pesos by using the reference exchange rate published by the Central Bank for the U.S. dollar, after application of the swap rate corresponding to the other currencies.
“Foreign currency” includes the net positions for each foreign currency, considering the totality of assets and liabilities in such currencies, and the gold position. Those positions in foreign currency which, individually considered at the close of each day of transactions, are below the equivalent of Ps.300,000 may be excluded. This exclusion will not apply if the computable foreign currencies considered as a whole at the close of each day exceeds Ps.1,500,000. Purchase or sale of contracts that give the right to buy or sell local assets and foreign assets are taken into consideration in calculating minimum capital requirements. The swaps and other derivatives on assets not affected by these regulations will be excluded from the portfolios that are subject to risk value calculation, provided such transactions are for the purpose of covering financial intermediation risks.
The market risk-related capital requirements are determined by using specific risk methodologies and are based on the financial institution’s daily net positions in any of the above-mentioned assets. These requirements follow, in general, standards established by the Basel Committee and the European Union.
Minimum Capital Requirement for Rate Risk: extends to all assets and liabilities for financial intermediation not included in the computation of market risk. It tries to capture the risk arising when sensitivity of the asset to changes in the interest rate does not match with that related with the liabilities.
The BCRA abrogated effective since January 1, 2013 the regulations on minimum capital for rate risk. Even so, the financial entities must continue to manage such risk, and will be subject to revision by the Superintendence, which may determine the need to pay a higher amount of capital.
Minimum Capital Requirement for Operational Risk: it is defined as the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events. The definition includes legal risk but excludes strategic and reputational risk. Financial entities must establish a system for the management of Operational Risk that includes policies, processes, procedures and the structure for their adequate management.
Seven operational risks event types are defined, according to internationally accepted criteria:
The Operational Risk management process comprises the following stages:
92
Financial institutions should be able to count on contingency plans and business continuity programs that are in accordance with the size and complexity of their operations, to ensure the continuity of their operating capacity and reduction of losses in the event of a business interruption.
The BCRA by Communication “A” 5282 established that the additional capital requirement for operational risk (which is added to the credit risk and market risk requirements) is equivalent to 15% of the average of positive gross income for the last three years.
This calculation will be made on a monthly basis by taking three periods of 12 consecutive months in which gross income was positive, considering the last 36 months preceding the month in which the calculation is made.
Gross Income is defined as the sum of:
The following items, however, must be excluded, as applicable, from the accounting entries mentioned in (i) and (ii) above:
According to the Central Bank regulations on minimum capital requirements, the financial entities must adjust to such regulations on an individual and consolidated basis.
By Communication “A” 5694, the BCRA established an additional requirement for financial institutions ranked as being of “local systemic importance“ (D-SIBs), equivalent to 1% of the risk-weighted asset, which they must comply with using exclusively level one ordinary capital (COn1).
On January 7, 2015, by Resolution No. 4, the BCRA set forth that BBVA Francés is considered as a local entity of systemic importance (D-SIBs).
A gradual implementation schedule was decided according to the following scheme:
Year
Jan/Mar
Apr/Jun
Jul/Sep
Oct/Dec
It is important to note that with respect to the rules on distribution of results and in order to verify solvency, an additional 1% of the additional requirement is applied as from December 2014, so the above schedule is not applicable. As at December 31, 2014, the Bank complies with 100% of the new additional requirement.
93
Any defects of application derived from the requirement of additional capital will not make the financial institutions fall within the section about noncompliance with the Minimum Capital Regulations, even if they will not be allowed to distribute cash dividends and pay fees, ownership interest or bonuses originated in the bank’s distribution of results.
By Communication “A” 5827, the BCRA repealed Communication “A” 5694 as of January 2015, and established that financial institutions must maintain the following as of that date.
The capital conservation margin will be equivalent to 2.5% of the amount of risk-weighted assets (APR). This is in addition to the minimum capital requirement.
Implementation will be gradual. The required margin will be 0.625% of the APR as of January 1, 2016, and will increase by 0.625 percentage points every year until reaching 2.5% by January 1, 2019.
Furthermore, those financial institutions that the BCRA deems to be domestic systemically-important banks (“D-SIBs”) or global systemically-important banks (“G-SIBs”), must increase their capital conservation margin by 1% of the APR, so they will be subject to a capital conservation margin of 3.5%.
The additional capital required for D-SIBs and G-SIBs will start from 0.25% of the APR as of January 1, 2016, and will increase by 0.25 % every year until reaching 1% of the APR by January 1, 2019.
The capital conservation margin must be composed exclusively of regular level 1 capital (COn1), net of any deductible items (CDCOn1).
Whenever in the opinion of the Central Bank credit growth is excessive, causing an increase in systemic risk, the Central Bank may establish, by giving up to 12 month advance notice, the obligation to constitute a contracyclical margin between 0% and 2.5% of the APR. The Central Bank may also eliminate or reduce this obligation whenever in its opinion such systemic risk has disappeared or decreased.
The Bank fully complied on an individual and consolidated basis with the ratios for minimum capital. If a financial institution does not comply with all these minimum capital requirements, it must submit a regulatory and restructuring plan to the Central Bank, which may impose various penalties, including:
The following table presents, at December 31, 2015, both the calculation of our ratio of capital to risk-weighted assets computed under the Basel Accord and our capital under the minimum capital rules of the Central Bank. In addition, see Note 24.12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
94
Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR)
By Communication “A” 5693, the BCRA ordered the application of the Liquidity Coverage Ratio, which took effect as of 01/30/15.
It sets forth that financial institutions must have an adequate stock of high-quality liquid assets (HQLA) free of any restrictions which can be immediately converted into cash in order to cover their liquidity needs during a period of 30 days in case of a stress scenario.
Also, financial institutions must carry out their own stress tests so as to determine the liquidity level they should maintain in other scenarios, considering a period higher than 30 calendar days.
The LCR must be equal to or greater than 1 (that is to say, the stock of high-quality liquid assets must not be lower than the total net cash outlays) in the absence of a financial stress scenario. If this is not the case, the LCR may fall below 1.
The BCRA describes how to categorize a stress scenario, taking into account the following: the partial loss of retail deposits; the partial loss of wholesale non-guaranteed funding capacity; the partial loss of guaranteed funding; additional fund outlays due to situations contractually provided for as a consequence of a significant decline in the financial institution’s credit quality; market volatility increases that have an effect on the quality of guarantees or on the potential future exposure of positions in derivatives; the unforeseen use of credit and liquidity facilities compromised and available but not used that the financial institution may have granted to its clients; and/or the need that the financial institution may experience to repurchase debt or to comply with non-contractual obligations so as to mitigate its reputational risk.
For implementing the above, the financial institutions must consider the following schedule:
Period
Ratio
95
The LCR calculation must be made on a permanent and monthly basis.
In order to calculate the LCR, the related assets include, among others, cash in hand, in transit, in armored transportation companies and ATMs; deposits with the BCRA; certain national public bonds in pesos or in foreign currency; securities issued or guaranteed by the International Payments Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the European Central Bank, the European Union or Multilateral Development Banks that comply with certain conditions and debt securities issued by other sovereign entities (or their central banks).
Rule on valuation of public sector debt instruments and BCRA’s monetary regulation instruments
The holdings of government securities and instruments issued by the Central Bank may be valued: (i) at fair value or (ii) at cost value increased according to their internal rate of return.
They will be recorded at their market value or present value.
They will be used for trading unless the entities expressly choose to value at cost value increased according to their internal rate of return.
They will be recorded at their incorporation value increased monthly by the internal rate of return.
CAMEL Quality Rating System
Under Law No. 24,144, the Central Bank established the “CAMEL” quality rating system which is based on weighting consistent and comparable criteria, creditworthiness, compliance with the Financial Institutions Law, its administrative order and the general operating solvency of the entity. Each letter of the CAMEL system corresponds to the following areas of the operations of each bank that is being rated: “C” represents capital, “A” represents assets, “M” represents management, “E” represents earnings and “L” represents liquidity. Each factor is evaluated and rated on a scale from 1 to 5, 1 being the highest rating an institution can receive. By combining the individual factors that are under evaluation, a combined index can be obtained which represents the final rating for the entity. The rating a bank receives from the CAMEL system can be used by the Central Bank in making decisions such as determining the levels of minimum capital or the amount of contributions a bank is required to contribute to the insurance guarantee system.
96
BASIC System
The Central Bank established a control system known as “BASIC” which requires that all financial institutions comply with a set of procedures affecting their transactions. The system allows public access to a higher level of information and security as regards its placements in the Argentine banking system. Each letter in the name of the BASIC system identifies one of the following procedures:
B (“Bonds”). By decision of the Central Bank’s board, banks were expected to issue bonds and other securities or obtain placements from international top-rated banks for an equivalent of 2% of their deposits in pesos and foreign currency. The placement of such bonds would make it possible for depositors to know the perception of the market on the equity situation of each financial entity. The requirement was abrogated by Communication “A” 3498 of the Central Bank, dated March 1, 2002.
A (“Audit”). The Central Bank requires a number of auditing procedures which include:
The purpose of this requirement is to ensure accurate representations by the financial institutions to both the Superintendency and to the public. It involves verifying the figures presented by the entity as well as an in-depth investigation into whether such figures appropriately reflect the activities of the bank in question.
S (“Supervision”). The supervision by the monetary authorities is not replaced but is naturally complemented and reinforced by the information from market sources and continues to be a basic element for controlling the financial system. In Argentina, as in most of the world, what is in use is a combination of remote analysis and inspections in the bank itself. The Argentine supervision system specifically applies an internationally recommended classification system, known as the above-mentioned CAMEL system. In summary, this requirement implies that the Central Bank reserves the right to regularly inspect all financial institutions.
I (“Information”). This is a fundamental element in banking supervision and also as regards the control exercised by the market. It is clear that no effective supervision is possible without relevant, reliable and timely information. No discipline can be imposed by the market on the banks and no control will be effective on the supervision if there is no access to such information. This is why the Central Bank requires that the financial institutions disclose certain statistical information on a daily, weekly, monthly and quarterly basis.
C (“Calificación” (Spanish for Rating)). The rating agencies play a significant role in banking supervision. The ratings serve to bring attention to the available guarantees and informs the less-specialized investors about the risk involved in the different securities. The investor’s information universe is thus expanded and this increases the efficiency of the information process. It would be economically inefficient for the smaller investors to conduct their own collection and analysis of information for each alternative present in the marketplace. This is the reason that justifies the existence of the rating agencies which appear in the marketplace to fulfil such role. The Central Bank established a system that requires that a credit evaluation be regularly performed by internationally recognized rating agencies.
Foreign Currency Position
General Exchange Position
As at the date of this report, the maximum limit for the general foreign exchange position that must be maintained on a daily basis by the financial institutions is the greater of:
97
The maximum limit is reduced by 50% if the financial entity has a debt on record for rediscounts and/or advances with the Central Bank for an amount exceeding 50% of the latest RPC recorded by the entity, excluding from that calculation debts with foreign creditors which the entity chose to refinance in terms of Communication “A” 3941 of the Central Bank.
To this effect, the Central Bank defined the general foreign-exchange position as the sum of the following items:
The general foreign exchange position does not include foreign assets of third parties under custody, balances with correspondents of third parties pending settlement, purchases and sales of foreign currencies or securities at a term and direct investments abroad.
In addition to the limit described above, all funds from foreign currency deposits and received financial loans granted with funds from foreign currency deposits must be applied mainly to the financing of foreign trade transactions, any deficiencies in the application of foreign currency lending capacity, net of a portion of: (i) cash balances, (ii) cash under custody in other financial entities, (iii) cash in transit and (iv) cash with armored car transport companies, requires an equivalent increase in the minimum cash requirement. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—The Argentine Banking System and its Regulatory Framework—Lending Capacity Provided by Deposits in Foreign Currency” above.
Global Net Position
Global Net Position could not exceed the following limits:
Own liquid resources means the excess of RPC with respect to immobilized assets and other concepts computed according to the rules on relationship of fixed assets and other items. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—The Argentine Banking System and its Regulatory Framework—Fixed Assets and Other Items” below.
98
This limit may be extended by an amount equal to the increase between January 2014 and the month that the global net position, of foreign credit lines, entered through the foreign exchange market.
Also a limit to the positive global net position for term transaction is established which may not exceed 7.5% of the RPC.
The global net position in foreign currency will include all assets and liabilities from financial intermediation in foreign currency and securities in foreign currency (deriving from cash and term transactions) including those contracts for derivatives linked to these concepts, those items which must be included in the General Foreign Exchange Position, all deposits in such currency in accounts opened with the Central Bank, as well as the gold position, any Central Bank bills in U.S. dollars as well as foreign currency debt securities. Term transactions made within a framework agreement in the area of self-regulatory markets of the country based on liquidation by difference will be also computed, without delivery of the negotiated underlying asset. Furthermore, the pass-through certificates or debt securities issued by financial trusts as well as the credit rights regarding ordinary trusts, in the pertinent proportion, when their underlying asset is constituted by assets in foreign currency, will also be considered.
Any excess above the limits will be subject to a charge equivalent to 1.5 times the nominal annual overdue interest rate arising from tenders for BCRA bills (LEBAC) denominated in pesos.
For financial information regarding our net foreign currency exposure, see Note 24.11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Fixed Assets and Other Items
The Central Bank determines that the fixed assets and other items maintained by the financial entities must not exceed 100% of the entity’s RPC. The BCRA has resolved to increase by 50 percentage points the specified limit to the extent that the immobilization of the assets is originated in the holding of national public securities and/or monetary regulation instruments of the BCRA appropriated as guarantee by financial institutions in favor of such entity according to the regulations in force for operations implemented by the ALADI Reciprocal Payments and Credits Agreement.
Such fixed assets and other items include the following:
Excluded from the above items are those assets deductible for calculating the entity’s RPC and assets affected as guarantee for certain operations mainly related to derivatives, as well as the financing transactions with certain related companies, provided the participation in the company exceeds 50% of the corporate capital and 50% of the votes.
The calculation of such assets will be effected according to the balances at the close of each month, net of depreciations, accumulated amortizations and bad debt risk allowances (except the allowance on the portfolio in a normal situation and grants covered by preferred guarantees “A”, which have been computed to determine the complementary net equity of the rules on Minimum Capital). It will also be possible to deduct certain liabilities related to the assets being calculated. In the case of financing transactions with related clients, the calculation will be based on the balance at the close of each month or the largest assistance provided to each client during the period in question.
Any excesses in this relationship generate an equivalent increase of the minimum capitals. Furthermore, any entity incurring noncompliance violations in three consecutive or four non-consecutive months within a period of twelve consecutive months must submit a regularization and normalization program.
99
Lending and Investment Limits
Private sector
Central Bank rules limit the amount of credit, including guarantees, that a commercial bank may extend to, and the amount of equity that it may invest in, any entity at any time. These limits are based on the Bank’s RPC on the last day of the immediately preceding month.
According to Central Bank rules, a commercial bank may not extend credit to a single non-related client and its affiliates, or invest in that client’s equity, in an amount in excess of 15% of the bank’s RPC. However, we may extend additional credit to that client up to 25% of the Bank’s RPC if that additional credit is secured with certain senior preferred liquid assets, including public or private debt securities. Total loans or other extensions of credit that a commercial bank may grant to any particular borrower and its affiliates are also limited based on the borrower’s net worth. Total loans or other extensions of credit to any particular borrower and its affiliates may not exceed, in general, 100% of such borrower’s net worth, but such limit may be increased to 300% of the borrower’s net worth if such amount does not exceed 2.5% of the Bank’s RPC.
The Central Bank requires that extensions of credit in any form in excess of 2.5% of a Bank’s RPC must be approved by the relevant branch manager, regional manager, relevant first line administrative officer of the credit area, general manager and credit committee, if any, of the bank, as well as by its board of directors, administration council or similar corporate body.
In addition, an equity investment of a commercial bank in another company that does not provide services that are complementary to the services provided by a commercial bank may not exceed 12.5% of the stockholders’ equity of such company.
Related Persons
The Central Bank limits the amount a bank can lend to, and the amount of equity it may invest in, a “Related Person”. A Related Person is defined to include:
“Control” is defined as:
The Central Bank established that the total amount of financing to a company or related person may not exceed the following percentages of their computable equity as of the last day of the month prior to that to which they apply:
100
Lender entity
Borrowing entity
Additional
Tranche I
Tranche II
Tranche III
25% in the event of financing transactions with guarantee or assignment of credit portfolio where assignor is responsible provided the requirements of Tranche I are met.
25% if the financing transactions involve guarantee or assignment of credit portfolio where assignor is responsible provided the requirements of Tranche I are met.
55% for financing transactions for an agreed initial term of up to 180 days.
20% if the financing transactions involve guarantee or assignment of credit portfolio where assignor is responsible provided the requirements of Tranche I are met.
Not meet any of the above conditions
(*) Subject to consolidation with the lender.
101
Maximum limits
To each foreign related bank:
-With “Investment Grade” classification
-Without “Investment Grade” classification:
Financing without computable warranty
Financing with/without computable warranty
10%
5%
To each foreign related bank subject to consolidation and parent company:
To each foreign related bank not subject to consolidation:
-Without “Investment Grade” classification
0%
102
Stock exchange agent or other broker, leasing, factoring or temporary acquisition of participation in companies to sell the holdings afterwards (**)
CAMEL
4 or 5
Complementary services companies (**)
(**)Subject to consolidation with the lender.
103
To each complementary services related companies:
-Financing without computable warranty
-Financing with/without computable warranty
To each complementary services companies subject to consolidation with the lender:
To each related borrower:
-To each related company (only equity investment) (***)
-To each related borrower that does not meet any of the above conditions
(***)Admitted activity under Section 3 of the rules on “Complementary services of the financial activity and permitted activities”.
To each related borrower
-To each related person to use exclusively for personal or family purposes
Ps.50.000
104
The total financing granted to all related clients may not exceed 20% of the RPC of the entity.
Failure to properly observe these requirements can result in an increase of the minimum capital requirements for credit risk in an amount equal to 100% of the daily excess amounts over the requirements beginning on the month when the excess amounts are not corrected and continuing while the excess amounts remain. In the case of information registered out of term, this increase will be applied beginning on the month when the information is registered and for as long as the default exists. Moreover, once the default has been corrected, the increase will be applied for a number of months equal to the period during which the Central Bank was not informed. For repeated defaults the increase can reach up to 130% of the excess amount.
At December 31, 2015, the aggregate of computable loans, other extensions of credit and equity investments by BBVA Francés on a consolidated basis to Related Persons totaled Ps.503.3 million, or 4.33% of BBVA Francés’ RPC.
Non-financial Public Sector
The non-financial public sector includes, inter alia:
The Central Bank may apply to public sector companies governed by Law No. 20,705 the general treatment foreseen for the non-financial private sector in connection with all effects of the rules applicable on the subject, provided they:
Compliance with all the above conditions must have been verified continuously during at least the ten years immediately preceding the date of the granting of financial assistance.
The Central Bank may agree on the general treatment for persons of the non-financial private sector, to all effects of the rules applicable on the subject to public sector companies which are not incorporated under Law No. 20,705 and which also comply with the following requirements:
105
Consequently, those corporations receiving the treatment set forth in this resolution will be exempted from the application of the provisions regarding financial assistance to the owners of entities in the non-financial public sector.
All financing granted to the above entities may not exceed the following limits with respect to the entity’s RPC as at the last day of the preceding month:
On the other hand, the Central Bank determined that any excesses to the above relations and to the limit mentioned in the last paragraph of this point, exclusively originated in the application of the new limits and conditions for computing financing transactions, will not be considered as non-compliances, provided that such excesses result:
106
public securities holdings, and iii) funds received for amortization services corresponding to the public sector assets involved.
However, no financing will be granted in those cases where the ratio of transactions comprised with respect to the Bank’s RPC determined as of March 31, 2003 is exceeded owing to reductions in this last parameter and until such relationship is reestablished.
Apart from the above-mentioned limits, the guarantee provided by the collection of taxes (either federal or local) and/or by the collection of royalties by provincial or municipal jurisdictions may not exceed 40% of the total of such income at the time of evaluating the granting of new financing, and considering the new financing about to be granted. This requirement does not apply to transactions guaranteed by pledge or leasing agreements.
The amount of non-exempted credit to and equity stakes in a single client, whether related to us or not, of a given bank which individually exceeds 10% of that bank’s RPC may not exceed, in the aggregate, three or five times the bank’s RPC, excluding loans in domestic financial institutions and including equity stakes in domestic financial institutions. This last limit does not consider those guaranteed loans received in exchange for national public debt securities implemented through guaranteed loans (Communication “A” 3366).
Loan Loss Allowance
The Central Bank has established specific loan loss allowance requirements for loans to borrowers classified as “Problem”, “Medium Risk”, “High Risk of Insolvency”, “High Risk”, “Irrecoverable” and “Irrecoverable for Technical Decision”. In addition, the Central Bank established a mandatory general allowance requirement for all performing loans. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Selected Statistical Information—Allowance for Loan Losses and Loan Loss Experience”.
Priority of Deposits
Law No. 24,485 as amended sets forth that in case of judicial liquidation or bankruptcy of a bank, all depositors, irrespective of the type, amount or currency of their deposits, would be senior to the other remaining creditors (such as the shareholders of the bank), with exceptions made for certain labor creditors (Article 53 paragraphs “a” and “b”) and for those creditors backed by a pledge or mortgage, in the following order of priority: (a) deposits of up to 350,000 pesos per person (including any amount of said person deposited with a financial entity), or their equivalent in foreign currency; (b) any and all deposits higher than Ps.350,000, or their equivalent in foreign currency; and (c) the liabilities originated in commercial lines granted to the Bank and that directly affect international commerce.
Furthermore, pursuant to article 53 of Law No. 21,526, as amended, Central Bank credits will have absolute priority over the other credits, except for pledged or mortgaged credits, certain labor credits, the depositors' credits as per art. 49, paragraph e), points i) and ii), credits granted under Article 17, paragraphs (b), (c) and (f) of the Central Bank’s Charter (including discount granted by financial entities due to temporary lack of liquidity, advances in favor of financial entities with security interest, assignment of rights, pledge or special assignment of certain assets) and credits granted by the Banking Liquidity Fund backed by pledge or mortgage.
The amendment introduced to art. 35 bis of Law No. 21,526 of Financial Entities by Law No. 25,780, sets forth that if a bank is in a situation where the Central Bank may revoke its authorization to operate and become subject to dissolution or liquidation by judicial resolution, among the options that the Central Bank’s Board may decide by absolute majority, in case of excluding assets and liabilities for their transfer in favor of financial trusts or other financial entities, the Central Bank may totally or partially exclude the liabilities mentioned in article 49, paragraph e), as well as its credits defined in art. 53, observing the order of priority among its creditors. Regarding the partial exclusion, the order of priority of point e) art. 49 must be followed, without assigning, in any case, a differentiated treatment to liabilities of the same grade.
Capital Markets
Under the Financial Institutions Law, banks may underwrite and place both equity and debt securities. There are currently no statutory limitations on the size of a bank’s underwriting commitments. However, a bank’s underwriting commitment would be treated as an extension of credit subject to the limitations discussed under “Item 4. Information on the Company—The Argentine Banking System and its Regulatory Framework—Lending and Investment Limits”.
107
Commercial banks are authorized to trade public and private debt securities in the Argentine over-the-counter market if they are members of the Mercado Abierto Electrónico (“MAE”) and authorized to act as over-the-counter brokers (“agentes de mercado abierto”). In our capacity as an over-the-counter broker, we are subject to MAE rules and the supervision of the CNV as our primary regulator, and accordingly, we must comply with certain reporting requirements.
Since 1990, the Buenos Aires Stock Market (Mercado de Valores de Buenos Aires—“MERVAL”) has authorized brokerage firms or houses organized as sole purpose corporations to operate as securities brokers on the MERVAL. Commercial banks may freely own a Securities Brokerage Company, as there are no current restrictions on ownership, and most of the principal commercial banks operating in Argentina have already established their own Securities Brokerage Company. An agreement between the MERVAL and representatives of the MAE dealers provides that trading in shares and other equity securities will be conducted exclusively on the BCBA and that all debt securities listed on the MERVAL may also be traded on the MAE. Trading in Argentine government securities, which are not covered by the agreement, is conducted mainly on the MAE. The agreement does not extend to other Argentine exchanges.
Commercial banks may operate as both managers and custodians of Argentine mutual funds; provided, however, that a bank may not act simultaneously as manager and custodian for the same fund.
We have been registered as an over-the-counter broker since 1989. In 1991, we created Francés Valores Sociedad de Bolsa S.A., currently renamed as BBVA Francés Valores S.A., by virtue of the last change of name registered before the Office of Corporations – Public Registry of Commerce (IGJ) on April 4th 2014 under number 5883 book 68.
On December 28, 2012 Law No. 26,831 “Capital Market Law” was enacted, and was further regulated by the CNV by Resolution No. 622/13 dated September 5, 2013, According to section 47 of the said law, all agents acting in the different markets, must have the prior approval and registration of the CNV. During 2014 Banco Francés and BBVA Francés Valores S.A. completed their registration as Settlement and Integral compensation Agents.
Financial Institutions with Economic Difficulties
Under the Financial Institutions Law, if a financial institution
then such financial entity must submit a regularization and normalization plan under such terms and conditions as may be established by the Central Bank within a term that may not exceed thirty days. This notwithstanding, the Central Bank may appoint overseers with veto powers and/or demand the creation of guarantees and restrict or prohibit the distribution of remittances or profits. The lack of submission, the rejection of or any noncompliance with the regularization or normalization plans entitle the Central Bank to revoke the authorization to operate as a financial entity and to apply sanctions. If the plan is accepted, the Central Bank may grant a temporary exemption with respect to the observance of the technical regulations and excuse or postpone the payment of fines (if any).
Likewise, and prior to the revocation of the authorization to operate as a financial entity, the Central Bank may authorize the restructuring of the entity for the protection of its depositors, by applying any of the following decisions or a combination thereof in a sequential, gradual or direct manner: reduction, increase and assignment of the corporate capital, exclusion of assets and liabilities and their transfer to other financial institutions, judicial intervention, responsibility for and transfer of excluded assets or liabilities.
Dissolution and Liquidation of Financial Institutions
As provided in the Financial Institutions Law, the Central Bank must be notified of any decision adopted by a financial institution’s legal or corporate authorities concerning its dissolution. The Central Bank, in turn, must then submit such decision to a competent court, which should determine whether the corporate authorities or an appointed independent liquidator will liquidate the entity. The court’s decision will be based on whether or not there is sufficient assurance that the corporate authorities are capable of carrying out such liquidation properly.
108
Pursuant to the Financial Institutions Law, the Central Bank no longer acts as liquidator of financial institutions. However, if a restructuring plan has failed or is not deemed feasible, or violations of local laws and regulations have been incurred, or significant changes have occurred in the institution’s condition since the original authorization was granted, then the Central Bank may revoke a bank’s license to operate as a financial institution. In this event, the law allows for judicial or extra-judicial liquidation. During the liquidation process and once the license to operate as a financial institution has been revoked, a court of competent jurisdiction may adjudge the former financial institution in bankruptcy or a petition in bankruptcy may be filed by any creditor of the bank after a period of 60 calendar days has elapsed since the license was revoked.
Money Laundering
The concept of money laundering is generally used to denote transactions intended to introduce criminal proceeds into the institutional system and thus to transform profits from illegal activities into assets of a seemingly legitimate origin.
On April 13, 2000, the Argentine Congress enacted Law No. 25,246 (as amended by Laws No. 26,087, 26,119, 26,268, 26,683 and 26,734) which defines money laundering as a type of crime. Also, such law creates the so-called Financial Information Unit (“FIU”), which establishes an administrative criminal system and replaces several articles of the Criminal Code.
Law No. 26,087 grants the FIU the power to obtain secret or confidential information at its sole request, requiring no Judicial Power intervention and eliminating any absolutory excuses for asset-laundering crimes. Law No. 26,119 modifies the integration of the FIU and Law No. 26,268 incorporates into the Criminal Code the crimes of illegal terrorist association and financing terrorism.
Money laundering is defined in the Criminal Code as providing for criminal sanctions whenever a person converts, transfers, manages, sells, encumbers or in any other manner uses money or any other asset deriving from illegal activities, in which such person has not participated, with the possible result that the original or substitute assets may appear as deriving from a legitimate origin; provided, however that the value of the assets exceeds the amounts indicated in the regulation, irrespective of whether such amounts are the result of one or more transactions.
The main purpose of Law No. 25,246 is to prevent money laundering. In line with internationally accepted practice, it does not attribute responsibility for controlling these criminal transactions only to government agencies, but also assigns certain duties to diverse private sector entities such as banks, stockbrokers, brokerage houses and insurance companies. These duties consist of information capturing functions. The Central Bank and the UIF regulation requires banks to take certain minimum precautions to prevent money laundering.
Financial entities must also inform the Superintendence of any transaction that is suspicious or unusual, devoid of any economic or legal justification, or which is unnecessarily complex, whether occurring on isolated occasions or repeatedly.
The Bank believes that it is in compliance with all applicable regulations on money laundering pursuant to the provisions issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, International Commerce and Culture on funds freezing and measures against presumed terrorists, by the Central Bank and by the FIU, in particular Resolution No. 31 of the FIU dated February 8, 2011 which regulates Article 21, sections a) and b) of Law No. 25,246 providing for the gathering of information in respect of suspicious transactions and their notification to the authorities.
Law No. 26,476, published and in force since December 24, 2008 and declared a public policy rule, establishes a system of tax regularization, promotion and protection of registered employment with priority for small and medium-sized entities, and of declaration and repatriation of capital. Subjects who decide to adhere to the declaration and repatriation of capital must comply with the provisions of Law No. 25,246 on asset laundering prevention. The term in order to adhere to this repatriation has expired, but the term regarding the registration of employment and tax regularization is still in force. Excluded from its scope of application are the amounts deriving from conducts liable to be included in article 6 of Law No. 25,246, with the exception of tax evasion or attempted tax evasion situations. The Argentine Public Revenue Administration – the Argentine Tax Authority (“AFIP”) issued this regulation on February 2, 2009.
Moreover, Decree No. 1,936/10 issued on December 9, 2010, introduced important changes into the Anti-Money Laundering Legislation. The principal dispositions of this Decree are to: (i) set forth the new role of the FIU, as the representative of the State to the FATF; and (ii) determine that each controlling entities must appoint a member of the board of directors as the maximum authority for Anti-Money Laundering Policies in charge of centralizing any information the Central Bank may require on its own initiative or at the request of any competent authority. In addition, this officer or other person will be responsible for the implementation, tracking, and control of internal procedures to ensure compliance with the regulations.
109
Law No. 26.860 was enacted by the Executive Branch on May 31, 2013. This law provided that individuals and legal entities, undivided estates of deceased persons and any person under Section 49 of the Income Tax Law, whether registered or not, may voluntarily declare foreign currency holdings in the country and abroad, with no need to disclose before the Argentine Federal Tax Authority (AFIP) the date of purchase of such holdings nor where such funds come from, except as provided by Law No. 25.246. On June 7, 2013 the Argentine Federal Tax Authority (AFIP) issued General Resolution No. 3,509, pursuant to which the declaration of foreign currency holdings in the country and abroad shall be submitted at any time up to and including September 30, 2013.
On November 7, 2014 the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) removed Argentina from its so-called grey list, the change of status was decided unanimously at the plenary meeting of the FATF held on Paris. The Financial Information Unit (UIF) issued Resolution No. 473/14 which provides a National Evaluation for Risk Assessment on Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Unit aimed at identifying, analyzing and evaluating the risks that the country faces regarding this matter; concentrating efforts on those areas where there is a greater risk in order to improve the efficiency of the Anti-Money Laundering System. Therefore, the Financial Information Unit (UIF) may request cooperation to regulatory and control authorities, public and private bodies handling these matters, liable parties in general and any other parties concerned.
Finally, the Central Bank issued a resolution widening the concept of Politically Exposed Individuals, including any person which has a material economic relation with the subject. These people must be clearly identified and closely monitored according to the Anti-Money Laundering New Rules. Also, the FIU has recently issued over 20 new resolutions in order to regulate the activities of all private and public entities in charge of controlling Anti-Money Laundering activities, establishing different deadlines in order to implement procedures which require among other things, the filing of (i) sworn statement regarding the legal origin of funds; (ii) certain documentation in order to prove the origin of the funds involved in the execution of operations, in the event those funds are equal or more than Ps.20,000 in the case of credit card limits, or Ps.200,000 in case of regarding transactions involving securities, etc.
The Bank requires the application of the “Know Your Customer” policies, which require that we identify our customers before entering into any commercial or contractual relationship, pursuant to Resolution Nº 11/11 of the UIF, as amended, regarding “politically exposed individuals.” We must also verify that our customers are not included in the lists of terrorists and/or terrorists organizations (Resolution No. 29/2013) and request information about the products to be used and the reasons why such products were selected. For regular customers, we must define the customer’s profile according to the information and documents provided by them, in order to set an annual estimated amount of operations, per calendar year, for each customer.
Furthermore, pursuant to Communication “A” 5612 of the Central Bank, in force since February 2016, no new commercial relationships may be initiated unless the “know your customer policies” and the risk management legal standards are complied with. In addition, for existing customers, if the “know your customer policies” cannot be complied with, the financial institution must cease operations with such client and end the relationship with that customer within 150 calendar days of receiving notice of such circumstances as set forth in the rule currently in force. However, if the financial institution determines that an operation is suspicious , operations must cease within 30 calendar days of that determination.
Moreover, financial institutions shall comply with additional requirements, namely: to create a manual establishing the mechanisms and procedures to be used to prevent money laundering and terrorism financing pursuant to the rules set forth in the FIU (UIF) Act ; b) to appoint a compliance officer who shall be a member of the board of directors, this officer will be responsible for the implementation, tracking, and control of internal procedures to ensure compliance with the regulations; c) to create an anti-money laundering committee responsible for planning, coordinating and monitoring compliance with anti-money laundering policies approved by the board of directors; d) to implement periodic audits independently of the anti-money laundering program; and e) to create a record of unusual and suspicious operations detected, among others.
In addition, CNV Rules establish that the parties involved in the public offering system (other than issuers) including, among others, natural or legal persons acting as placement agents for the issuance of any negotiable instrument, shall comply with the rules set forth in the FIU (UIF) Act for the capital markets sector.
Deposit Guarantee Insurance System
Law No. 24,485, published on April 18, 1995 and Decree No. 540/95 of the same date provided for the organization of a Bank Deposit Guarantee Insurance System. This system is limited, mandatory, and for valuable consideration, designed to provide coverage for risks inherent in bank deposits, as a subsidiary and supplementary protection to that offered by the system of bank deposit privileges and protection created by the Financial Institutions Law.
That Law provided for the organization of the company “Seguros de Depósitos Sociedad Anónima” to manage the Deposit Guarantee Fund, whose shareholders, as amended by Decree No. 1,292/96, will be the Central Bank, with one share, as a minimum,
110
and the trust made up of the financial institutions in such proportion as may be determined by the Central Bank for each one, based on their contributions to the Deposit Guarantee Fund.
This guarantee system does not include:
We hold a 8.8649% equity interest in the company “Seguros de Depósitos Sociedad Anónima” as of December 31, 2015.
The amount covered by the deposit guarantee system is Ps.350,000. In the case of transactions in the name of two or more persons, the guarantee will be prorated among the respective holders. The total guarantee amount by persons may not exceed Ps.350,000, regardless of the number of accounts and/or deposits.
The deposits for amounts over Ps.350,000 are also included in the guarantee system up to the Ps.350,000 limit. The Central Bank may decide at any time to amend the guarantee system cover amount based on continued consolidation of the Argentine financial system or any other indicators.
The Argentine insurance system was financed by monthly contributions from all financial institutions operating in Argentina. These contributions are equivalent to 0.06% of average daily balances of demand deposits, time deposits, term investments, salary account of social security and fixed assets of previous concepts. When private sector time deposits denominated dollars are applied to the subscription of LEBAC denominated dollars, this contribution will be equal to 0.015%.
Furthermore, institutions must make an additional contribution which will depend on the rating assigned by the Central Bank, the excess recorded in the integration of the RPC and the portfolio quality. This additional contribution may not exceed the standard contribution once.
SEDESA may issue nominative non-endorsable securities to be offered to depositors as payment of the deposit guarantee whenever it did not have sufficient funds for such purpose. Such securities, whose conditions would be established for general purposes by the Central Bank, must be accepted by the financial entities in order to constitute deposits.
At December 31, 2015 and the date of the filing of this Form 20-F, the Bank complies with each regulatory requirement discussed in this section.
Credit Cards Law No. 25,065
Law No. 25,065, enacted in 1999, governs different aspects of the credit, purchase and debit card system. In its main aspects, this law: (i) creates an obligation to sign a contract between the bank and the holder of the credit card before the card is issued, (ii) fixes a maximum limit to financial interest charged on balances, which may not exceed by more than 25% of the rate applied to personal loan transactions, (iii) sets a maximum 3% fee to be charged by the banks to commercial establishments, and is not entitled to charged commercial establishments in the same line of business with different rates and (iv) prohibits providing information to financial background databases regarding particulars of credit card holders in delinquent payment situations.
Law No. 26,361, enacted in 2008, amended article 50 of Law No. 25,065, thus empowering the Secretariat of the Domestic Commerce, dependent on the Ministry of Economy and Production, in those commercial aspects deriving from its function as authority of application, to issue regulatory provisions and exercise its powers to control, survey and determine compliance. The City of Buenos Aires and the Provinces will act as local authorities of application, with powers which they may delegate, if applicable,
111
to their dependent bodies or to municipalities. Irrespective of the above, the national authority of application may act concurrently, even if the presumed infringements occur only within the scope of the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires or the Provinces.
The Central Bank of the Argentine Republic, with the enforcement of Law No. 25,065, is the Authority of Application in matters concerning financial aspects unmodified to this date.
Disclosure of Iranian Activities under Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act
We are disclosing the following information pursuant to Section 13(r) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act), which requires an issuer to disclose whether it or any of its affiliates knowingly engaged in certain activities, transactions or dealings relating to Iran or with natural persons or entities designated by the U.S. Government under specified Executive Orders, including activities not prohibited by U.S. law and conducted outside the United States by non-U.S. affiliates in compliance with local law. In order to comply with this new requirement, we have requested relevant information from our affiliates globally.
BBVA Banco Francés S.A. has not knowingly engaged in activities, transactions or dealings relating to Iran or with natural persons or entities designated by the U.S. Government under the specified Executive Orders.
Because we are controlled by Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. (BBVA), a Spanish corporation, our disclosure includes activities, transactions or dealings conducted outside the United States by non-U.S. affiliates of BBVA and its consolidated subsidiaries (the “BBVA Group”) which are not controlled by us. BBVA is subject to the disclosure requirements of Section 13(r) for its Form 20-F for the year ending December 31, 2015. In advance of that filing, we have requested that BBVA provide us a detailed description of reportable activity under Section 13(r) and have received the following information:
Legacy contractual obligations related to counter indemnities. Before 2007, the BBVA Group issued certain counter indemnities to its non-Iranian customers in Europe for various business activities relating to Iran in support of guarantees provided by Bank Melli, three of which remained outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2015. For the year ended December 31, 2015 no payments or revenues (including fees and/or commissions) have been recorded in connection with these counter indemnities. In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No. 267/2012 of March 23, 2012, any payments of amounts due to Bank Melli under these counter indemnities will be initially blocked and thereafter released upon authorization by the relevant Spanish authorities. The BBVA Group is committed to terminating these business relationships as soon as contractually possible and does not intend to enter into new business relationships involving Bank Melli.
Letter of credit. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the BBVA Group had credit exposure to Bank Sepah arising from a letter of credit issued by Bank Sepah to a non-Iranian client of the BBVA Group in Europe. This letter of credit, which was granted before 2004, was used to secure a loan granted by the BBVA Group to a client in order to finance certain Iran-related activities. This loan was supported by the Spanish export credit agency (CESCE). The loan related to the client’s exportation of goods to Iran (consisting of goods relating to a pelletizing plant for iron concentration and equipment). Interest charged by the BBVA Group in the year ended December 31, 2015 in connection with this letter of credit totaled US$15,536.03. This amount was initially blocked, pending release upon authorization by the relevant Spanish authorities. Before year end, the release of US$2,844.52 was authorized by the relevant Spanish authorities. Accordingly, for the year ended December 31, 2015, gross revenues (including fees and/or commissions) recorded in connection with this letter of credit totaled US$2,844.52. The BBVA Group does not allocate direct costs to fees and commissions and therefore has not disclosed a separate profit measure. The BBVA Group is committed to terminating the outstanding business relationship with Bank Sepah as soon as contractually possible and does not intend to enter into new business relationships involving Bank Sepah.
Iranian embassy-related activity. The BBVA Group maintains bank accounts in Spain for two employees of the Iranian embassy in Spain (the bank accounts of one additional employee were closed on March 20, 2015). The two employees are Spanish citizens and one of them has retired. Estimated gross revenues for the year ended December 31, 2015 from embassy-related activity, which include fees and/or commissions, did not exceed US$1,093.60. The BBVA Group does not allocate direct costs to fees and commissions and therefore has not disclosed a separate profit measure. The BBVA Group is committed to terminating these business relationships as soon as legally possible.
ITEM 4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
112
ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
Considerations on Economy in Argentina
In 2013, the economic activity, measured in terms of GDP, recovered from the low growth of the previous year. After growing 0.8% in 2012, GDP grew by 2.9% during 2013.
No significant changes were observed in the labor market and the average unemployment rate stood at 7.1% in 2013, slightly below the average of 2012.
Inflation, as measured by the CPI, reached 10.9% at December 31, 2013, showing a marginal increase over the previous year.
Fiscal policy remained expansive and in 2013 a primary fiscal deficit of Ps.22,479 million was recorded mainly due to an increase in public spending.
The GDP at constant prices grew 0.5% in 2014. This was the consequence of a 0.4% decrease in private consumption, a 5.5% decrease in investment and a 7.7% decrease in exports. These setbacks were compensated by a 2.5% increase in public consumption and a 12.6% decrease in imports during the year.
The labor market was not immune to this economic situation and the unemployment reached an average rate of 7.3% in 2014.
Starting in January 2014, the INDEC published a new price index, the so-called National and Urban Consumer Price Index (IPC-NU). The main characteristics of this new index were its national coverage and the new goods and services baskets being measured. The new indicator comprised six geographical zones with their respective regional baskets. Measured by the IPC-NU, the accumulated inflation was 23.9% as at December 31, 2014.
During 2014, the fiscal policy remained expansive, recording a primary fiscal deficit of Ps.38,562 million compared with Ps.22,479 million in the previous year, representing a 71.5% decrease. This was the consequence of a 43.4% increase in primary spending during the year, compared with a 42.5% increase in total spending.
INDEC published revised GDP figures for 2015 on March 30, 2016. According to such figures, Argentine GDP at constant prices grew 2.1% in 2015 compared with 2014.
With respect to the labor market, the latest published information is for the third quarter of 2015 and reflected a decrease in the unemployment rate to an estimated 5.9% compared with the 7.5% unemployment rate for the same quarter of 2014.
In the first ten months of 2015 the inflation measured by the IPC-NU reported an 11.9% increase, representing a 14.3% increase in the year-to-year variation. The IPCBA (a price index compiled by the Statistical Office of the government of the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires) for the same period recorded accumulated inflation of 19.8% (representing annual 23.8% increase compared with 2014). The publication of the IPC-NU has been suspended since October 2015. Based on the IPCBA, which is the approach suggested by the new authorities of the INDEC for adjusting the CER coefficient, inflation reached 26.9% at the end of 2015.
The fiscal policy continued its very expansive trend during 2015. In 2015, the primary fiscal deficit increased to Ps.104,797 billion, from Ps.38,562 billion in the previous year, revealing significant deterioration. This deterioration was mainly due to a 34.5% increase in primary spending and a 29.3% increase of total income, on a year-to-year basis.
On December 17, 2015 the new government announced the elimination of all restrictions imposed on the access of agents to the foreign exchange market, the so-called “Corralito” (“Foreign-Exchange Clamp”), which had been implemented in 2011. The Peso had been subject to an average devaluation of around 1.1% per month between January and November 2015. In December, due to the abrogation of the Foreign-Exchange Clamp and the normalization of the exchange rate, the Peso experienced a devaluation of 34%. The exchange rate reached 13.005 Ps./US$ at the end of the year, representing an annual increase of 52.6%. The average exchange rate in December 2015 was of 11.45 Ps./US$, 33.9% higher than the average of 8.55 Ps./US$ in December of 2014.
113
Effects of Recent Events on BBVA Francés
2015 was a year of changes in Argentina, mainly conditioned by the political agenda. In December 2015, Mr. Mauricio Macri assumed office as the new President.
Regarding the macroeconomic environment described above, it should be mentioned that as of the date of this report, BBVA Francés has not suffered any adverse effect on its financial condition, operations, liquidity and results of operations as consequence of the reported default and foreign exchange controls imposed by the previous government. The new Administration, elected in December 2015 is introducing several regulatory changes, is negotiating with the funds so called “holdouts” holding the sovereign debt and is eliminating foreign exchange controls among other measures.
In December 2015, after assuming office, the Macri Administration also declared a “Statistic Emergency” as a consequence of inconsistencies detected in the information provided by the INDEC. This measure involves the suspension of the release of new economic figures, such as CPI, GDP, etc. by the INDEC.
For business planning purposes, regarding salary increases we rely on the salary increases agreed amongs the Argentine banking labor union, business chambers and the government.
Since 2012, the Bank has been subject to a set of regulations issued by the BCRA, some of which have already been abolished or modified by the Macri Administration and which are summarized below:
Regulations regarding capital requirements and dividend distribution
In January 2012 the BCRA increased the capital requirements related to operational risk for financial institutions operating in Argentina and introduced an additional buffer requirement equivalent to 75% of the total capital requirement solely for the purpose of distributing profits. As a consequence, BBVA Francés was not able to distribute dividends for the fiscal years 2011 and 2012. For the fiscal year 2013, the Bank was authorized to pay a cash dividend in the amount of Ps.28.8 million.
In January 2015 the BCRA concluded that BBVA Francés is considered for all purposes as a “domestic systemically important bank” (D-SIBs). A new capital requirement of 1% of risk-weighted assets was required for such entities to be implemented gradually from 2016 to 2019. Such requirement, however, is immediately effective for purposes of profit distributions which means that D-SIBS are not allowed to distribute dividends until they meet such requirement and the BCRA approves such distribution.
In addition, since January 2015 financial institutions must also record allowances for 100% of any administrative, disciplinary and criminal penalty implemented or which may result from administrative, disciplinary or criminal proceedings initiated against them. Financial institutions must also disclose in a note to their financial statements any proceedings initiated by the BCRA against them from its inception, regardless of the amounts involved or whether such amounts have been quantified.
The dividend distribution policy of the Bank for fiscal year 2014 was affected by these regulations, resulting in a proposal by the Board of Directors of a Ps.400 million cash payment to its shareholders. On February 2, 2016, the BCRA authorized BBVA Francés to distribute the proposed cash dividends for fiscal year 2014. The authorization, not only for BBVA Francés but for every financial institution that asked BCRA for authorization to distribute cash dividends for fiscal year 2014, delayed in time due to the existing restrictions to access the foreign exchange market, a situation that was reverted when the new administration took office.
Based on the Bank’s results of operations for fiscal year 2015, the Board of Directors has resolved to propose a cash dividend payment to the shareholders in the amount of Ps.900 million at the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting. Such payment is subject to approval at the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting and subject to obtaining the applicable regulatory authorizations, which may delay in time. The Macri Administration has shown signs that it will to authorize financial institutions to distribute cash dividends within a usual/prudential amount of time.
Regulations regarding credits for productive investment projects
In 2012, the BCRA established that certain financial institutions should allocate a minimum portion of their total deposits to finance investment projects. This requirement has been renewed every six months since then. In December 2015, the BCRA extended this requirement to 2016, increased the minimum required percentage to 14% of the deposits stock of the relevant financial institution as of November 2015 and imposed a fixed annual interest rate of 22%. As of the end of 2015, the Bank has placed approximately Ps.7.4 billion in credit lines for productive investment, complying with the required quota and accumulating a total amount of Ps.15.9 billionsince the second half of 2012.
114
Regulations regarding foreign exchange market and foreign exchange bank’s positions
In line with the restrictions on the foreign exchange market imposed since 2011, the volume of BBVA Francés’ intermediation transactions denominated in U.S. dollar significantly declined as well and the Bank recorded a decrease of 34% in U.S. dollar denominated deposits during the full year 2012. However, since 2013 these deposits have been recovering. As of December 31, 2015 the Bank’s U.S. dollar-denominated deposits totaled Ps.12,562 million (equivalent to US$966 million using 13.0050 Ps/US$ exchange rate as of such date). These deposits represented 16% of the Bank’s total deposits as of such date.
On November 20, 2015, the BCRA issued Communication “A” 5834 with a schedule to reduce the limits applicable to financial institutions regarding their net global position in foreign currency. Since November 30, 2015 the cap of the long position was reduced from 20% to 15% of the lesser of the computable regulatory capital and its own liquid resources (from 10% to 7.5% in forward transactions). Such cap was further reduced since December 9, 2015 to 10% (5% in forward transactions). Subsequently, through Communication “A” 5851 of December 17, a new schedule was established increasing these limits to 15% (7.5% in forward transactions) from February 1, 2016, and to 20% (10% in forward transactions) from March 1, 2016. In addition, through Communication “A” 5852, the BCRA established that financial institutions must sell their net long position in foreign currency to the Central Bank by December 16, 2016 for a price based on the exchange reference rate of that day, and that they must buy it back from the Central Bank completely between December 17 to 21 at the reference exchange rate on the date of repurchase.
The exchange rate (the BCRA reference rate) closed at Ps.13.005 per U.S. dollar on December 31, 2015, increasing 38.5% from the Ps.9.41 rate registered on September 30, 2015 and 52.6% compared to December 31, 2014.The significant increase in the exchange rate is the result of the abolishment of restrictions to operate in the foreign exchange market.
Regulations regarding interest rates
During 2014, the BCRA issued a set of rules regarding the reference interest rate for personal loans and car loans granted to retail customers, that are not considered as micro, small and medium size companies (MiPyMEs), and it also established a minimum reference interest rate for fix-term deposits held by individuals that not exceed Ps.350 thousand. On July 27, 2015, the BCRA increased the minimum interest rate for long term deposits, increasing the maximum amount covered to Ps.1 million from Ps.350 thousand. In addition to individuals, companies are now eligible to apply for these types of deposits.
In December 2015 the BCRA issued Communication “A” 5853 through which it deregulated both lending and funding rates.
Regulations regarding income from services and the Deposit Guarantee Fund
In October 2014, the monthly contribution that banks must set aside each month to fund the Deposits Guarantee Fund (Fondo de Garantía de los Depósitos) was increased from 0.015% to 0.06% of the monthly average of the daily deposits balance which has had a negative impact on the Bank’s income statement since then.
In April 2016, the BCRA issued Communication “A” 5943 by which that percentage returned to the original figure (0.015% of the monthly average of the daily deposits).
Regarding fees and charges, in 2013 the BCRA established new rules for basic financial products and services. Then, in December, 2014, the BCRA restricted the rules and determined that all increases or re-pricing of fees charged by financial entities must have prior authorization from the BCRA.Previously, the regulation was applicable only to those financial products or services considered as “basic” by the BCRA.
Further, on July 31, 2015, the BCRA issued Communication “A” 5785, which amended previous regulations protecting the consumers of financial services. The amendments include the imposition of limitations to the amount of certain charges that may be imposed to customers. For example, they prevent financial institutions from collecting fees on deposits in branches other than where the account is held and from generating margins for insurance on financial services to individuals.
In March 2016, the BCRA established through Communication “A” 5928 that all financial institutions may increase their fees by up to 20% and that by September 2016, no authorization will be required in order to further increase their fees.
Regulations regarding liquidity
115
In January 2015, the BCRA issued a new rule on “Liquidity coverage ratio”, under which financial institutions must have funds of high quality assets free of restrictions in case of potential stress scenarios. BBVA Francés has internalized this metric and, given the quality of its assets and its liquidity management, it far exceeds the Basel requirements.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with Argentine Banking GAAP, which differ in certain respects from generally accepted accounting principles in Argentina, as described in Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. These rules require us and our subsidiaries to make estimates and assumptions. Some of these estimates require difficult, subjective or complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain, and as a result, actual results could differ from those estimates. Due to the estimation process involved, the following summarized accounting policies and their applications are considered to be critical to understanding the business operations, financial condition and results of operations of the Bank and its subsidiaries.
Allowance for Commercial Loan Losses
We provide for estimated possible losses on loans and the related accrued interest generally through the establishment of an allowance for loan losses. The allowance for commercial loan losses charged to expense is determined by management based on a periodic analysis of updated financial information provided by the debtor at our request. The basic assessment criterion is the future debt payment capacity or the collateral granted to us on the basis of the estimated cash flow. We also take into account other circumstances such as timely compliance with obligations, qualified and honest management, whether the company is engaged in economic activities with acceptable prospects and the competitiveness of the debtor within its industry.
On the basis of these conditions, the customer is placed in one of six categories established by the Central Bank that have been assigned minimum fixed allowance requirements. Based on our analysis, we book additional allowances for certain debtors, which does not require re-categorizing the debtor under the rules of the Central Bank. The use of different estimates or assumptions could result in different allowances for commercial loan losses.
Contingent Liabilities
We are subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims related to labor, commercial, civil and other matters. We make determinations of the amount of reserves required, if any, for these contingencies after a careful analysis of each individual issue. The required reserves may change in the future due to new developments in each matter or changes in the settlement strategy.
We are a defendant in several actions in which the petitioner claims the government measures taken with respect to their deposits during the Argentine Crisis was a violation of constitutional law. Several judges in these actions have issued injunctions against us ordering: 1) the reimbursement of deposits in amounts larger than those provided for under current legislation, 2) the release of rescheduled deposits or 3) inapplicability of the “emergency framework” legislation passed by the National Congress and the measures issued by the Federal Executive or the Central Bank. Pursuant to the decisions adopted by Argentina’s Supreme Court of Justice (“Massa, Juan Agustín v. Argentine Executive Branch – Executive Order 1570/ et al over action for the protection of constitutional rights (amparo) Law No. 16,986” and “Kujarchuk v. Argentine Executive Branch”), a calculation method was established for the payment of bank deposits that was different from the one that had been instituted by the Argentine Executive Branch. We estimated the value of this contingency as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and we raised allowances for the total amount.
At December 31, 2015, as described in Note 3.4.13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Bank recorded as an intangible asset the difference in nominal terms between the deposit at the free market exchange rate at the moment of each payment compared to the book value of 1.40 pesos per dollar plus CER to that date. This asset has been amortized in 60 monthly instalments since April 2003. As of December 31, 2015 these assets have been fully amortized, with the total accumulated amortization as of December 31, 2015 amounting to Ps.1,441,094 thosand. Moreover, we explain in that note to the Consolidated Financial Statements that the amortization described above is charged solely to comply with the regulations of the Central Bank and that it should not be interpreted as an implicit waiver of possible compensation or recovery of the exchange rate differences resulting from the compliance with court orders granted in actions seeking the protection of civil rights or other legal actions derived from the mandatory conversion of bank deposits into pesos.
Fair Value
Argentine Banking GAAP differ from U.S. GAAP in valuing financial instruments. U.S. GAAP requires financial instruments to be valued at fair value. We estimate the fair value as the amount at which a financial instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced sale or liquidation, and such value is best evidenced by a quoted market price, if one exists. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair value estimation is based on the quoted market price of
116
a financial instrument with similar characteristics, the present value of expected future cash flows, or other valuation techniques, all of which are significantly affected by the assumptions used (see Note 25.12 to Consolidated Financial Statements).
Although we use our best judgment in estimating the fair value of these financial instruments, there are inherent weaknesses in any estimation technique. As a result, the fair value may not be indicative of the net realizable or liquidation value. Moreover, minor changes in the assumptions used could have a significant impact on the resulting estimated fair values.
For a detailed description of the applicable accounting principles, please see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Differences Between Argentine Banking GAAP and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Effective in Argentina
The most significant differences between the rules prescribed by the Central Bank and the professional accounting standards effective in Argentina are detailed below (see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements):
Other differences with respect to generally accepted accounting principles effective in Argentina are listed below:
In all other material respects, Central Bank rules are consistent with generally accepted accounting principles in Argentina.
By Communication “A” 3921 of the BCRA and General Resolution No. 441/03 of the CNV, in compliance with Decree 664/03 of the Federal Executive, application of the restatement method on financial statements in equivalent purchasing power has been suspended since March 1, 2003.
Argentina’s professional accounting standards require applying Technical Pronouncement No. 6 of the Argentine Federation of Professional Councils in Economic Sciences (FACPCE) (as amended by Technical Resolution No. 19) which sets forth that financial statements are to be restated in constant currency when the country’s economic environment exhibits certain characteristics. A prerequisite for the application of this pronouncement is that inflation as accumulated throughout a three-year period, measured by the
117
so-called Domestic Wholesale Price Index (IPIM) published by the INDEC, reaches or exceeds 100%. As per the latest information released by the INDEC, inflation accumulated in the period October 31, 2012 to October 31, 2015, measured by the above-mentioned index was 66%. Therefore, the prerequisite for restatement into constant currency of the information contained in the financial statements is not satisfied. If this prerequisite were satisfied, the restatement would be mandatory.
The following discussion is based upon information contained in the Consolidated Financial Statements and should be read in conjunction with them. The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules of the Central Bank related thereto (Argentine Banking GAAP), which differ in certain respects from Argentine GAAP and U.S. GAAP. The principal differences between Argentine Banking GAAP and U.S. GAAP are discussed in Note 25 to the Consolidated Financial Statements as they relate to us, together with a reconciliation to U.S. GAAP of our net income and total stockholders’ equity. For a more detailed description of the accounting principles and considerations used in preparing the following discussion, see “Presentation of Financial Information”.
Results of Operations for the Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.
As previously discussed in “Presentation of Financial Information”, we have not been legally required to restate our financial statements in constant currency as the inflation levels have remained below certain limits. However, inflation in Argentina has been high during the periods discussed herein (inflation accumulated in the period from October 31, 2012 to October 31, 2015 measured by the IPIM index was 66% per the latest information released by the INDEC) and therefore the evolution of all the line items discussed below has been significantly impacted by inflation.
Our net income for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 was Ps.3,784.5 million (including gains from discontinued operations of Ps.5.9 million). This income was mainly due to a 23.98% increase during the period in Gross Intermediation Margin, a 30.29% increase during the period in Service Charge Income and a 15.04% increase during the period in Other Income, partially offset by a 82.14% increase during the period in Service Charge Expenses, a 17.62% increase during the period in Operating Expenses, a 22.73% increase during the period in Income Tax, a 56.35% increase during the period in Other Expenses, a 10.85% increase during the period in Allowances for Loans losses and a 31.26% increase during the period in losses from Minority Interest in Subsidiaries.
Our net income for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 was Ps.3,204.5 million (including losses from discontinued operations of Ps.3.7 million). This income was mainly due to a 52.66% increase during the period in Gross Intermediation Margin; a 35.46% increase during the period in Service Charge Income and a 46.95% increase during the period in Other Income, partially offset by a 43.75% increase during the period in Operating Expenses; a 48.98% increase during the period in Income Tax; a 39.12% increase during the period in Service Charge Expenses; a 26.78% increase during the period in Allowances for Loans losses; a 90.51% increase during the period in Minority Interest in Subsidiaries and a 13.91% increase during the period in Other Expenses.
Financial Income
Our Financial Income increased by 24.76% to Ps.16,564.8 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 (Ps.16,560.8 million corresponded to continued operations and Ps.4.0 million to discontinued operations) from Ps.13,277.0 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (Ps.13,271.3 million corresponded to continued operations and Ps.5.7 million to discontinued operations) and increased by 61.06% in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 from Ps.8,243.4 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (Ps.8,235.3 million corresponded to continued operations and Ps.8.1 million to discontinued operations).
The components of our Financial Income (including discontinued operations) are reflected in the following table.
118
The increase in Financial Income during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 was mainly due to an increase in net income from government and private securities (mainly due to the variations in the valuation of the portfolio), interest on credit card loans, interest on other loans, interest on loans with privileged guarantees and interest on overdraft. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in other financial income (which includes interest from financial leases and exchange differences, among other), indexation by benchmark stabilization coefficient (CER), interest on loans to the financial sector and interest from other receivables from financial transactions. The variation in Financial Income reflected an overall increase in average volume of interest earning assets and, to a significantly lesser extent, increase in the average nominal interest rate of interest earning assets as shown in the table below.
The increase in Financial Income during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 was mainly due to an increase in net income from government and private securities, interest on other loans, interest on credit card loans, interest on overdraft, other financial income, interest on loans with privileged guarantees, indexation by benchmark stabilization coefficient (CER) and interest on loans to the financial sector. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in interest from other receivables from financial transactions. The variation in Financial Income reflected an overall increase in average volume of interest earning assets and increase in nominal interest rate of interest earning assets.
The CER is an index that reflects the variation in inflation in Argentina and is calculated based on the daily variations in the CPI as determined by the INDEC. The Indexation by CER clause represents the recognition of the adjustment for loans indexed by CER. As of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the Bank held Ps.1,553.4 million, Ps.1,199.73 million and Ps.910.58 million, respectively, of CER-indexed assets, which represented 1.40%, 1.61% and 1.56%, respectively, of our total assets as of such dates. These CER-indexed assets were mainly Federal government secured bonds due in 2020 and a smaller amount of Federal government secured loans that we received as a consequence of several swaps made since 2001 in the context of Argentina's sovereign debt restructuring process..
The following table sets forth the changes in Financial Income due to increases or decreases in the volume of interest-earning assets and increases or decreases in the average nominal rates of interest-earning assets. Financial Income excludes exchange differences and premiums or forward sales of foreign exchange.
December 31, 2015 vs. December 31, 2014Increase (Decrease)
December 31, 2014 vs. December 31, 2013 Increase (Decrease)
Financial Expenses
Financial Expenses increased by 25.81% to Ps.7,121.0 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 (all Ps.7,121.0 million corresponded to continued operations and none to discontinued operations) from Ps.5,660.1 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (Ps.5,662.6 million corresponded to continued operations and Ps.2.5 million (gains) to discontinued operations) and increased by 73.95% from Ps.3,253.8 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (Ps.3,256.8 million corresponded to continued operations and Ps.3.0 million (gains) to discontinued operations).
The components of our Financial Expenses (including discontinued operations) are reflected in the following table.
119
____________________
(1) Includes interest on “CEDROS”.
The increase in Financial Expenses during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 was mainly due to an increase in interest on time deposit, other financial expenses, interest from other liabilities from financial transactions and interest on savings deposits. The variation in Financial Expenses reflected an increase in average volume of interest bearing liabilities partially offset by a decrease in the average nominal rates of interest bearing liabilities as shown in the table below.
The increase in Financial Expenses during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 was mainly due to an increase in interest on time deposit, other financial expenses, interest from other liabilities from financial transactions and interest on savings deposits. The variation in Financial Expenses reflected increases in the volume of and the average nominal rates of interest-bearing liabilities as shown in the table below.
Taxes on Financial Income and Contributions to the Bank Deposit Guarantee Insurance System, included within Other Financial Expenses, amounted to Ps.1,311.8 million, Ps.924.1 million and Ps.577.2 million during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Contributions to the Bank Deposit Guarantee Insurance System increased during fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013 due to increases in the volume of time deposits, savings deposits and checking accounts.
The following table sets forth the changes in Financial Expenses due to increases or decreases in the volume of interest-bearing liabilities and increases or decreases in the average nominal rates of interest-bearing liabilities. Such Financial Expenses exclude exchange rate variations and premiums on forward purchases of foreign exchange, contributions to the Bank Deposit Guarantee Insurance System, other mandatory contributions and taxes on interest income.
Gross Intermediation Margin
Our Gross Intermediation Margin (defined as Financial Income minus Financial Expenses) of Ps.9,443.8 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 (Ps.9,439.8 million corresponded to continued operations and Ps.4.0 million to discontinued operations) represented a 23.98% increase over our Gross Intermediation Margin of Ps.7,616.9 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (Ps.7,608.7 million corresponded to continued operations and Ps.8.2 million to discontinued operations) which in turn represented a 52.66% increase over our Gross Intermediation Margin of Ps.4,989.6 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (Ps.4,978.4 million corresponded to continued operations and Ps.11.2 million to discontinued operations).
The following table sets forth the changes in the components of our Gross Intermediation Margin (including discontinued operations) for the periods discussed herein:
120
December 31, 2014 vs. December 31, 2013Increase (Decrease)
The increase in the Gross Intermediation Margin in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 was principally due to an increase in the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and an increase of the average nominal rates of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.
The increase in the Gross Intermediation Margin in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 was principally due to an increase in the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and an increase of the average nominal rates of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.
See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Selected Statistical Information—Average Balance Sheets, Interest Earned on Interest-Earning Assets and Interest Paid on Interest-Bearing Liabilities” and “Item 4. Information on the Company—Selected Statistical Information—Interest-Earning Assets: Net Interest Margin and Spread”.
Allowance for Loan Losses
Allowance for Loan Losses totaled Ps.637.0 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, a 10.85% increase compared with Ps.574.7 million of Allowance for Loan Losses in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, which in turn represented a 26.78% increase compared with Ps.453.3 million of Allowance for Loan Losses in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. The increase during 2014 was driven by macro economic conditions in the Argentine economy during 2014. During that year the Argentine financial system showed signs of deterioration as a result of inflation increase and the consequent loss of salaries’ purchasing power, and as a result of the increase on investments being unable to mitigate the rise in the delinquency ratio or the increase in expected losses. The fiscal year ended on December 31, 2014 also showed a slow growth of the real economy. Similar reasons caused the further increase in 2015 as during 2015, the Argentine financial system continued to show signs of deterioration as a result of inflation increase. The consequent adjustment in salaries and unemployment rate, however, allowed maintaining the purchasing power and thus a declining a delinquency ratio and declining expected losses.
Our non-performing loan portfolio amounted to Ps.370.0 million at December 31, 2015, representing a 11.54% decrease compared with Ps.418.3 million at December 31, 2014 which in turn represented a 47.15% increase compared with Ps.284.3 million at December 31, 2013.
The non-performing loan portfolio ratio decreased to 0.64% at December 31, 2015 from 0.99% at December 31, 2014, which had in turn increased from 0.76% at December 31, 2013.
The chart below shows the evolution of the expected losses for the periods discussed herein and, in particular, how the probability of default within our loan portfolio decreased during 2015.
121
Our management believes that our allowance for loan losses is adequate to cover any known losses and any losses inherent in our loan portfolio. For a discussion of our policy with respect to the establishment of our allowance for loan losses see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Selected Statistical Information—Allowance for Loan Losses and Loan Loss Experience”.
Service Charge Income
Service Charge Income was Ps.6,095.8 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, Ps.4,678.5 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 and Ps.3,453.8 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. The fiscal year 2015 amount represented a 30.29% increase from the amount earned in fiscal year 2014. The fiscal year 2014 amount, in turn, represented a 35.46% increase from the amount earned in fiscal year 2013.
The following table provides a breakdown of our Service Charge Income by category.
122
Service charges on deposit accounts are comprised principally of maintenance fees on checking and savings accounts and transaction fees on checking accounts. These fees increased by 33.44% from Ps.818.2 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 to Ps.1,091.8 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 and further increased by 32.73% to Ps.1,449.1 million at December 31, 2015. The increases in the fiscal years 2015 and 2014 were mainly due to increases in the volume and number of transactions of such accounts. At December 31, 2015 we had 3,497,464 deposit accounts compared with 2,900,506 accounts at December 31, 2014 and 2,658,673 accounts at December 31, 2013.
Income from credit card operations, which consists of customer fees, retailer transaction fees, merchant processing fees and penalty charges, increased by 35.68% to Ps.2,212.9 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 from Ps.1,631.0 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, which in turn had increased by 38.74% to Ps.1,175.5.9 million in fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. The increase in the fiscal year 2015 was mainly due to increases in activity and in the use of credit cards. The increase in the fiscal year 2014 was mainly due to increases in activity. At December 31, 2015, the total number of credit cards we had issued amounted to 2,920,750 compared with 2,523,540 at December 31, 2014 and 2,648,187 at December 31, 2013.
Other fees related to foreign trade increased by 48.70% from Ps.102.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2013 to Ps.151.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2014 and increased by 21.76% to Ps.184.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in the fiscal years 2015 and 2014 was mainly due to increase in fees charged for transfers abroad.
Credit related fees increased by 16.89% from Ps.458.9 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 to Ps.536.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2014 and further increased by 31.23% to Ps.703.9 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. These increases were mainly due to the increase of new loans granted by the Bank and its subsidiary PSA Finance for the purchase of new and second-hand cars.
Fees related to fund management increased by 143.65% from Ps.57.6 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 to Ps.140.4 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 and further increased by 22.98% to Ps.172.6 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, owed principally to the increase in volume of securities traded by the Bank and its subsidiary BBVA Francés Asset Management.
Income from capital markets and securities activities principally represents fees from underwriting and placement of corporate bonds, commercial paper and equity securities. It also reflects fees for our corporate advisory business, but excludes gains from trading government securities. Trading gains or losses are included in “Financial Income” or “Financial Expenses”, respectively, under “Net income / (expense) from government and private securities”. Finally, income from capital markets and securities activities also includes brokerage commissions earned by BBVA Francés Valores, BBVA Francés’ securities brokerage subsidiary, but does not include similar income earned by BBVA Francés itself, which is recorded as “Financial Income” under “Net income from government and private securities”. Income from capital markets and securities activities increased by 23.84% from Ps.46.9 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 to Ps.58.1 million in the fiscal year December 31, 2014, and further increased by 11.70% to Ps.64.9 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, mainly due to the increase in securities trading.
Rental of safety deposit boxes increased by 33.85% from Ps.110.9 million in the fiscal year December 31, 2013 to Ps.148.5 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, and further increased by 27.17% to Ps.188.8 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. These increases were mainly due to the increase in prices charged for the service.
Fees related to guarantees decreased by 41.56% from Ps.1.5 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 to Ps.0.9 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 and increased to Ps.3.9 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. The variations of this item reflect fewer guarantees granted.
Fees related to insurance agency increased by 48.46% from Ps.345.9 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 to Ps.513.5 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, and further increased by 15.14% to Ps.591.2 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. These increases reflect higher commissions charged by the sale of insurance products for leasing operations.
123
Other service charge income increased by 20.79% from Ps.336.3 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 to Ps.406.2 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, and further increased by 28.87% to Ps.523.5 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, mainly due to an increase in the fees charged for the use ATMs.
Service Charge Expenses
Service Charge Expenses, which consist of fees related to the credit and debit cards and taxes on service charge income, increased by 82.14% to Ps.2,420.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2015 from Ps.1,329.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2014, which had in turn increased by 39.12% from Ps.955.3 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, mainly as result of the increase in commissions paid for the promotion of credit cards as well as internal reclassifications from this item to Operating Expenses during 2015.
Operating Expenses
Our Operating Expenses increased by 17.62% to Ps.6,595.1 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 (Ps.6,588.2 million corresponded to continued operations and Ps.6.9 million to discontinued operations) from Ps.5,607.1 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (Ps.5,594.2 million corresponded to continued operations and Ps.12.9 million to discontinued operations), which had in turn increased by 43.75% from Ps.3,900.5 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (Ps.3,882.0 million corresponded to continued operations and Ps.18.5 million to discontinued operations).
Operating Expenses increased in fiscal year 2015 mainly because of increases in personnel expenses, other operating expenses, taxes, courier transportation, rentals, depreciation of Bank premises and equipment, fees and external administrative service, advertising and promotion, staff welfare expenses, maintenance and repairs, utilities, amortization of organization and development expenses and business travel and development expenses, partially offset by a decrease in credit card advertising and issuance expenses.
The components of our Operating Expenses (including discontinued operations) are reflected in the following table:
The largest component of Operating Expenses in each of these years was personnel expenses, which increased by 21.99% to Ps.3,369.6 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 from Ps.2,762.3 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, which in turn had increased by 45.62% from Ps.1,896.9 in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, principally as result of increases in salaries (which include payroll, termination payments and bonuses). Salaries annually vary mainly as a result of the negotiation between umbrella organizations representing financial institutions on the one hand and trade unions on the other and are linked to inflation.
The number of our full-time employees increased from 5,222 in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 to 5,437 in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 and further increased to 5,784 in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 (excluding 11 employees from non-banking subsidiaries at each of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013).
124
Other operating expenses increased by 38.54% to Ps.700.4 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 from Ps.505.6 million at December 31, 2014, which had in turn increased by 28.05% from Ps.394.8 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. The increase in 2015 and 2014 was mainly due to the increase in costs related to security services.
Taxes, other than income tax, increased by 37.05% to Ps.676.7 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 from Ps.493.7 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, which had in turn increased by 48.52% from Ps.332.4 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. The increase in 2015 and 2014 was mainly due to the increase in the activity and, in the case of 2014, also due to the change in tax rates applicable to certain services.
Courier transportation increased by 69.28% to Ps.172.8 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 from Ps.102.1 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, which had in turn increased by 66.62% from Ps.61.2 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. The increase in 2015 and 2014 was mainly due to increases in the cost of the service.
Rentals expenses increased by 30.89% to Ps.268.3 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 from Ps.205.0 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, which had in turn increased by 28.30% from Ps.159.8 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. The increase in 2015 and 2014 was mainly due to higher rental costs. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014 our branch network consisted of 251 branches, of which 112 were located in properties we own and 139 were located in properties we lease. As of December 31, 2013 our branch network consisted of 245 branches, of which 111 were located in properties we owned and 134 were located in properties we leased.
Depreciation of Bank property and equipment increased by 43.19% to Ps.199.4 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 from Ps.139.2 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, which had in turn increased by 38.18% from Ps.100.8 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. The increase in 2015 and 2014 was the result of acquisitions of additional properties and equipment.
Fees and external administrative services increased by 14.70% to Ps.347.7 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 from Ps.303.1 million at December 31, 2014, which had in turn increased by 99.14% from Ps.152.2 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. The increase in 2015 and 2014 was related to increases in the cost of services and in the cost of hiring external resources.
Advertising and promotion fees increased by 12.86% to Ps.214.8 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 from Ps.190.3 million at December 31, 2014, which had in turn increased by 29.56% from Ps.146.9 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. The increase in 2015 and 2014 was mainly due to an increase of the sponsoring expenses incurred in connection with football activities during the period.
Staff welfare expenses increased by 26.79% to Ps.110.1 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 from Ps.86.8 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, which had in turn increased by 38.45% from Ps.62.7 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. The increase in 2015 and 2014 reflects the granting of additional personnel benefits to the Bank´s employees, such as benefits for pre-schooling and housing.
Maintenance and repair expenses increased by 6.91% to Ps.276.9 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 from Ps.259.0 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, which had in turn increased by 41.39% from Ps.183.2 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. The increase in 2015 and 2014 was mainly due to the higher maintenance and repair costs.
Utilities costs increased by 14.38% to Ps.107.8 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 from Ps.94.2 million at December 31, 2014, which had in turn increased by 42.69% from Ps.66.0 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. The increase in 2015 and 2014 was mainly due to an increase in the general level of activity of the Bank and in the cost of utility services.
Amortization of organization and development expenses increased by 14.49% to Ps.66.8 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 from Ps.58.4 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, which had in turn increased by 19.10% from Ps.49.0 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. The increase in 2015 and 2014 was caused by the addition of new intangible assets to the organization and development expenses line item in both fiscal years.
Business travel and development expenses increased by 19.91% to Ps.41.2 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 from to Ps.34.4 million at December 31, 2014, which had in turn increased by 30.37% from Ps.26.3 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. The increase in 2015 and 2014 was due to an overall increase in travels and in the numbers of delegations sent abroad.
125
Credit card advertising and issuance expenses decreased by 88.51% to Ps.42.9 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 from Ps.373.1 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, which had increased by 39.09% from Ps.268.2 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. The decrease during 2015 was due to internal reclassifications from Service Charge Expenses to Operating Expenses. The increase in 2014 was mainly due to expenses related to debit and credit cards.
Other Income
Other Income increased by 15.04% to Ps.611.2 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 (Ps.596.7 million corresponded to continued operations and Ps.14.5 million to discontinued operations) from Ps.531.3 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, which had in turn increased by 46.95% from Ps.361.5 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (Ps.354.4 million corresponded to continued operations and Ps.7.1 million to discontinued operations).
The increase in Other Income in the fiscal year 2015 was mainly due to a 82.56% increase in other income (which includes principaly recovery of allowances), a 7.56% increase in loans recovered and reversals of allowances, a 8.53% increase in adjustment and interest for other receivables, a 18.68% increase in punitive interest and a 5.02% increase in rentals, partially offset by a 19.05% decrease in deferred income tax (offset, in turn, by a charge for the same amount in “Charge for uncollectability of other receivables and other allowances” account, under the other expenses item), a 0.33% decrease in long-term investments and a 36.89% decrease in gains from the sale of premises and equipment and other assets.
The increase in Other Income in the fiscal year 2014 was mainly due to a 99.93% increase in long-term investments, a 61.87% increase in adjustment and interest for other receivables, a 22.45% increase in other income, a 81.55% increase in punitive interest, an increase in deferred income tax from a loss of Ps.25.8 million in fiscal year 2013 to a gain of Ps.8.4 million in fiscal year 2014, a 3.64% increase in loans recovered and reversals of allowances, a 65.44% increase in rentals and an increase in gains from the sale of premises and equipment and other assets.
Other Expenses
Other Expenses increased by 56.35% to Ps.526.8 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 from Ps.337.0 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (Ps.335.7 million corresponded to continued operations and Ps.1.3 million to discontinued operations), which had in turn increased by 13.91% from Ps.295.8 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (Ps.295.7 million corresponded to continued operations and Ps.0.1 million to discontinued operations).
The increase in other expenses in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 was mainly due to a 49.04% increase in charge for uncollectability of other receivables and other allowances from Ps.236.8 million in fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 to Ps.353.0 million in fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, caused in turn by the increase in allowances for labor lawsuits, an increase in other expenses from Ps.57.3 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 to Ps.123.7 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, a 91.80% increase in incidences from Ps.10.1 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 to Ps.19.4 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, a 37.41% increase in donations from Ps.16.2 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 to Ps.22.3 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and a 69.11% increase in depreciation on other assets from Ps.0.9 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 to Ps.1.6 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. These increases were partially offset by a 57.31% decrease in depreciation on differences paid on constitutional protection action from Ps.15.5 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 to Ps.6.6 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.
The increase in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 was mainly due to a 42.42% increase in charge for uncollectability of other receivables and other allowances from Ps.166.3 million in fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 to Ps.236.8 million in fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, caused in turn by the increase in allowances for other contingencies, a 18.88% increase in donations from Ps.13.6 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 to Ps.16.2 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, a 12.07% increase in incidences from Ps.9.0 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 to Ps.10.1 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 and an increase in depreciation on other assets from Ps.0.4 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 to Ps.0.9 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. These increases were partially offset by a 61.71% decrease in depreciation on differences paid on constitutional protection action from Ps.40.5 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 to Ps.15.5 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 201) and a 13.06% decrease in other expenses from Ps.65.9 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 to Ps.57.3 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, mainly due to the accounting for a deferred tax loss offset by the same amount recorded in loans recovered and reversals of allowances in other income.
Income Tax
Income Tax expense was Ps.2,050.5 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 (Ps.2,049.9 million corresponded to continued operations and Ps.0.6 million to discontinued operations), representing a 22.73% increase from Ps.1,670.7 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (Ps.1,670.0 million corresponded to continued operations and Ps.0.7 million to discontinued
126
operations), which had in turn increased by 48.98% from Ps.1,121.5 million in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (Ps.1,120.5 million corresponded to continued operations and Ps.1.0 million to discontinued operations). The increase in fiscal year 2015 was mainly due to higher profit before tax and differences between tax and accounting bonds. The increase in fiscal year 2014 was mainly due to higher profit before tax.
The following table illustrates, for each of the last three fiscal years, our income before tax, the income tax expense that would have been payable at the statutory rate, various adjustments and our actual income tax expense.
Our effective income tax rate differs from the statutory income tax rate applicable to us. The difference between the statutory rate and the effective rate is principally due to the following factors. First, income from equity investments are not to be computed for tax calculation purposes. The results from branches located in Tierra del Fuego as well as the interest for guaranteed loans are also exempted from taxation. Second, the effective tax rate is affected by the different treatment of loan loss provisions for financial and tax reporting purposes. Additionally, the allowance made on public loans is not tax deductible. Finally, government securities are generally marked-to-market for tax reporting purposes, with unrealized gains and losses included in taxable income even if such securities are accounted for on a cost-plus-yield basis for financial reporting purposes. See Note 25.1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements..
Minority interest in subsidiaries
Results on minority interest in subsidiaries were Ps.136.1 million, Ps.103.7 million and Ps.54.4 million for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. These variations were mainly due to the changes in net income of PSA Compañía Financiera (in which we hold a 50% interest) and Consolidar AFJP (undergoing liquidation proceedings) (in which we hold 53.89% interest).
Financial Condition
Total Assets
At December 31, 2015 we had total assets of Ps.110,736.2 million, which represented a 49.06% increase from Ps.74,288.9 million of total assets as of December 31, 2014.
The increase was mainly due to a 122.69% increase in cash and due from banks and correspondents from Ps.12,560.1 million at December 31, 2014 to Ps.27,970.3 million at December 31, 2015, a 36.49% increase in loans net of allowances from Ps.41,442.8 million at December 31, 2014 to Ps.56,563.3 million at December 31, 2015, a 23.97% increase in government and private securities from Ps.11,633.5 at December 31, 2014 to Ps.14,422.2 million at December 31, 2015, a 42.74% increase in other receivables from financial transactions from Ps.2,612.4 million at December 31, 2014 to Ps.3,728.9 million at December 31, 2015, a 73.21% increase in other receivables from Ps.1,372.4 million at December 31, 2014 to Ps.2,377.1 million at December 31, 2015, a 31.48% increase in other assets from Ps.1,188.0 million at December 31, 2014 to Ps.1,561.9 million at December 31, 2015, a 16.12% increase in receivables from financial leases from Ps.2,073.2 at December 31, 2014 to Ps.2,407.5 million at December 31, 2015, a 19.08% increase in bank premises and equipment from Ps.929.8 million at December 31, 2014 to Ps.1,107.2 million at December 31, 2015, a 63.72% increase in intangible assets from Ps.144.7 million at December 31, 2014 to Ps.236.9 million at December 31, 2015 and a 9.41% increase in investments in other companies from Ps.323.0 million at December 31, 2014 to Ps.353.4 million at December 31,
127
2015. These increases were partially offset by a 61.75% decrease in suspense items from Ps.8.6 million at December 31, 2014 to Ps.7.7 million at December 31, 2015 and a decrease of Ps.0.5 million in other subsidiaries’ assets at December 31, 2015.
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
At December 31, 2015, we had total liabilities and minority interests in subsidiaries of Ps.97,019.8 million, which represented a 51.70% increase from the Ps.63,957.0 million at December 31, 2014. The increase was mainly due to a 49.42% increase in deposits from Ps.51,442.9 million at December 31, 2014 to Ps.76,864.5 million at December 31, 2015, a 74.44% increase in other liabilities from financial transactions from Ps.8,617.5 million at December 31, 2014 to Ps.15,032.0 million at December 31, 2015, a 33.72% increase in other liabilities from Ps.2,771.8 million at December 31, 2014 to Ps.3,706.6 million at December 31, 2015, a 26.15% increase in allowances from Ps.818.1 million at December 31, 2014 to Ps.1,032.0 million at December 31, 2015, a 22.49% increase in minority interests in subsidiaries from Ps.276.1 million at December 31, 2014 to Ps.338.1 million at December 31, 2015 and a 53.66% increase in suspense items from Ps.30.3 million at December 31, 2014 to Ps.46.5 million at December 31, 2015. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of Ps.0.3 million in other subsidiaries’ assets at December 31, 2015.
Stockholders’ equity increased by 32.76% from Ps.10,331.9 million at December 31, 2014 to Ps.13,716.4 million at December 31, 2015. The increase resulted mainly from Ps.3,784.5 million of net income for the year, less the distribution of Ps.400 million of dividends in cash. In addition the Bank increased its legal and facultative reserves by Ps.640.9 million and Ps.2,163.6 million, respectively, against retained earnings.
Significant changes in financial condition
The item Cash and due from banks and correspondent show a significant increase during 2015 principally due to the growth in the checking account in pesos and foreign currency held by the Bank at the Central Bank.
The loan portfolio to the private sector totaled Ps.55,859.3 million at December 31, 2015, representing a 35.58% increase compared with the previous twelve months. Consumer loans registered strong growth increasing the portfolio by 42.4%. Such increase was mainly due to 59.8% growth in credit cards followed by a 23.6% growth in car loans and a 20.6% growth in personal loans. Commercial loans grew by 29.3% mainly due to the performance of loans to SMEs. The good performance of loans to SMEs was the result of the implementation by the government of the “Line of credit for productive investment” for SMEs, which allowed us to market additional loans and leasing products. This line of credit provides that certain financial institutions must allocate 7.50% of their deposits to fund certain investment projects to SMEs at an annual rate of 19% for the first half of 2015 and 18% for the second half of 2015 for a minimum period of 36 months.
Government and private securities increased in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 principally due to the increase in the instruments issued by the BCRA held because of the liquidity policy implemented by the Bank. The liquidity policy of the Bank requires us to keep a minimum percentage of the total deposits in liquid assets, among them and particularly, in Argentine Central Bank Internal Bills (LEBAC). Between 2011 and 2013 credit grew in Argentine at a higher rate than deposits. This scenario, however, changed in 2014 when deposits started to grow at a faster rate than credit due to the increase in interest rates by Central Bank in order to keep the local currency exchange rate. In line with the Bank’s policy stated above, the Bank invested the excess of cash resulting from the mismatch in the growth rate of credit and deposits in short-term (five-month average life) local currency LEBAC.
Our deposits increased during 2015 in line with the growth shown by the Argentine financial system. Time deposits, savings and checking accounts registered a significant growth during 2015, of 61.60%, 49.71% and 24.45%, respectively. Peso deposits increased by 39.93% in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and those in foreign currency grew by 128.89% over the same period.
Other receivables from financial transactions also recorded an increase in fiscal year 2015 mainly due to the instruments to be received for spot and forward sales to be settled, particularly in purchases of foreign currency to be settled. These types of transactions are generally conducted on daily basis and on a very short-terms basis (1 to 5 days).
Other liabilities from financial transactions increased in fiscal year 2015 mainly due to an increase in the balances to be paid because of transactions with credit cards.
Asset and Liability Management
The purpose of the asset and liability management is to structure our consolidated balance sheet in light of interest rates, liquidity and foreign exchange risks, as well as market risk, public sector risk and capital structure. Our Asset and Liability Committee
128
establishes specific limits with respect to risk exposure, sets forth our policy with respect to pricing and approves commercial policies which may have a financial impact on our balance sheet. It is also responsible for the follow-up of monetary aggregates and financial variables, our liquidity position, regulations from the Central Bank and monitoring the competitive environment in assets, liabilities and interest rates.
Liquidity
Our asset and liability management policy attempts to ensure that sufficient liquidity is available to meet our funding requirements. As a measure of our liquidity, our ratio of liquid assets to total deposits was 55.15%, 47.03% and 37.34% at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Liquid assets include cash, amounts due from banks and government and corporate securities.
Our primary source of funds is our deposit base, which primarily consists of peso- and dollar-denominated deposits in checking accounts, savings accounts and time deposits from individuals and corporations, which deposits at December 31, 2015 totaled Ps.76,864.5 million compared with Ps.51,442.9 million at December 31, 2014.
On July 15, 2003, an Extraordinary Stockholders’ Meeting approved the setting up of a program for the issuance and re-issuance of ordinary non-convertible corporate bonds with ordinary guarantee, or such guarantees as may be decided by the Bank, and unsecured subordinated corporate bonds, convertible or not into shares (the “Program”. During the life of the Program, which was initially of five years, it was possible to issue and re-issue any number of series and/or classes of corporate bonds as long as the maximum amount in circulation, after adding together all series and/or classes outstanding under the Program pending redemption, did not exceed at any time US$300,000,000 (or the equivalent thereof in other currencies). The Program was approved by CNV Resolution No. 14,967 dated November 29, 2004.
The Program was amended according to the resolutions adopted by the Ordinary and Extraordinary Stockholders’ Meeting held on April 26, 2007. It was extended for five additional years by resolution adopted by the Ordinary and Extraordinary Stockholders’ Meetings held on March 28, 2008 and on April 9, 2013 (approved by the CNV by Resolutions No. 16,010 and No. 17,127 dated November 6, 2008 and July 11, 2013, respectively) and the maximum amount of the issuance was successively increased from US$300,000,000 to US$500,000,000 and from US$500,000,000 to US$750,000,000 by resolution adopted by the Ordinary and Extraordinary Stockholders’ Meetings held on March 30, 2011 and March 26, 2012, respectively.
The issued corporate bonds were fully subscribed and paid in and they will be fully amortized at maturity. To the current date we have issued 18 series of corporate bonds under the Program. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
As provided for in the Argentine Corporate Bonds Law (Ley de Obligaciones Negociables) and the BCRA regulations, the proceeds obtained from the issuance of Classes 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 17 and 18 of our corporate bonds were applied to the reimbursement of time deposits. The proceeds from the issuance of Class 15 of our corporate bond were applied to grant working capital loans and those obtained from the issuance of Class 16 of our corporate bond were applied to the reimbursement of Class 8 of our corporate bonds.
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the outstanding principal and accrued interest amounts to Ps1,799,245 (in connection with Classes 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17 and 18 of the corporate bonds) and Ps1,725,644 (in connection with Classes 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 of the corporate bonds), respectively.
Dividends and other payments from our Argentine non-banking subsidiaries also provide an additional potential source of liquidity, even though relatively insignificant in amount. Each Argentine non-banking subsidiary is required to allocate 5% of its annual net income to a legal reserve until such reserve equals 20% of the subsidiary’s capital stock. This reserve cannot be used to pay us dividends.
In addition, our subsidiary PSA Finance has a program to issue corporate bonds. At December 31, 2015 the outstanding principal and accrued interest amounted to Ps.103,317.
Capital Resources
At December 31, 2011 the capital stock of the Bank consisted of 536,877,850 ordinary shares, par value Ps.1.00 each, all of which were issued to the stockholders.
129
On March 26, 2012, the Ordinary and Extraordinary General Shareholders’ Meetings of BBVA Francés and Otar approved a preliminary merger agreement, the consolidated financial statements for purposes of the merger as of December 31, 2011 and the shares’ exchange ratio.
The Shareholders’ Meeting of BBVA Francés above mentioned approved the increase in capital stock of BBVA Francés by issuing 50,410,182 book-entry, ordinary shares with a par value of Ps.1 each and 1 vote per share, to be listed for public offering at the BCBA in order to be delivered to the shareholders of Inversora Otar. In addition, immediately after the above-mentioned capital increase, BBVA Francés would redeem the 50,410,182 book-entry ordinary shares, with a par value of Ps.1 each and right to 1 vote each that it owns subject to the previous capital stock reduction derived from the merger.
On July 18, 2013, the BCRA decided not to make any observations against the merger by absorption of Otar by BBVA Francés through its Resolution No. 473. On August 8, 2013, the CNV approved the merger by absorption in accordance with Section 82 of the Argentine Companies Law pursuant to its Resolution No. 17,155. On March 27, 2014, the merger was registered with the Supervisory Board of Companies (IGJ) under No. 5,302 of Book 68 of Stock Corporations. Finally, 50,410,182 book-entry ordinary shares with par value Ps.1 each and 1 vote per share of BBVA Francés were redeemed and 50,410,182 book-entry, ordinary shares with par value Ps.1 each and 1 vote per share of BBVA Francés were simultaneously issued and delivered in exchange to Otar’s former shareholders.
As at December 31, 2015 the Bank’s stock capital consisted of 536,877,850 ordinary shares, par value Ps.1.00 each, all of which were issued to the stockholders.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
A key component of our asset and liability policy is the management of interest rate sensitivity. Interest rate sensitivity is the exposure and the measure of sensitivity to interest rate variations. The interest rate sensitivity measures the impact on the gross intermediation margin in response to a change in market interest rates. For any given period, the pricing structure is matched when an equal amount of assets and liabilities reprice. Any mismatch of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities is known as a gap position and is shown in the following tables. A negative gap denotes liability sensitivity and normally means that a decline in interest rates would have a positive effect on net interest income while an increase in interest rates would have a negative effect on interest income.
Our interest rate sensitivity strategy takes into account not only the rates of return and their underlying degree of risk, but also liquidity requirements, including minimum regulatory cash reserves, mandatory liquidity ratios, withdrawal and maturity of deposits and additional demands for funds. Our gap limits are established and subsequently monitored by the Asset and Liability Management Committee.
The following table shows the interest rate sensitivity of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Variations in interest rate sensitivity may also arise within the repricing periods presented.
During 2015, the gap generated by the mismatch between CER-index assets and liabilities accrued at a fixed rate in pesos declined considerable. Bank’s risk assets, mainly public sector loans and bonds, accrue CER adjustment plus an annual interest rate, while most liabilities accrue interest at a fixed rate. Fixed rate assets and liabilities with a maturity of no more than three months and total adjusted assets and liabilities are included in the following table, in the 0-3 months interval, given that CER adjustment changes on a monthly basis. The table below shows our exposure to a positive interest rate gap but it is important to bear in mind that CER behavior may differ from interest rate behavior.
130
0-3 months
3 Months- One Year
1-5 Years
5-10 Years
Over 10 Years
The following table shows the interest rate sensitivity of our peso-denominated interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.
Remaining Maturity or Earliest Repricing Intervals at December 31, 2015
The following table shows the interest rate sensitivity of our foreign currency denominated interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Variations in interest rate sensitivity may also arise within the repricing periods presented.
131
Exchange Rate Sensitivity
At December 31, 2015, our total foreign exchange-denominated asset position was Ps.20,720.1 million and our total foreign exchange-denominated liability position was Ps.18,475.4 million, resulting in a net asset currency position of Ps.2,244.7 million.
For a description of the changes in the exchange rates since December 2011, see “Item 3. Key Information—Exchange Rates” and Note 24.11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. For a description of foreign exchange risk, see “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk—Foreign Exchange Risk”.
Capital Requirements
As of December 31, 2015, we had consolidated excess capital of Ps.6,636.4 million pursuant to the Central Bank’s rules. At such date, “Basic Net Worth” and “Complementary Net Worth”, subject to applicable deductions, amounted to Ps.13,704.2 million under the Argentine risk-based capital guidelines, which are based on the Basel Committee.
As of December 31, 2014, we had consolidated excess capital of Ps.5,307.2 million pursuant to the Central Bank’s rules. At such date, “Basic Net Worth” and “Complementary Net Worth”, subject to applicable deductions, amounted to Ps.10,406.6 million under the Argentine risk-based capital guidelines, which are based on the Basel Committee.
As of December 31, 2015, we complied with the Central Bank’s capital requirements on a consolidated basis and our capital resources were sufficient for our capital requirements. See a description of the minimum capital requirements currently in effect in “Item 4. Information on the Company—The Argentine Banking System and its Regulatory Framework”.
As of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, our stockholders’ equity was Ps.13,716.4 million, Ps.10,331.9 million and Ps.7,156.2 million, respectively. At such dates, our ratio of average stockholders’ equity/average total assets was 13.00%, 13.17% and 11.89%, respectively. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Selected Statistical Information—Return on Equity and Assets”.
In our opinion, our capital resources are sufficient for the Bank’s present requirements on an individual and a consolidated basis.
We are not aware of any legal or economic restrictions on the ability of our subsidiaries to transfer funds to us in the form of dividends, loans, advances — subject to the regulations of each industry — or by other means. However, there can be no assurance that in the future such restrictions will not be adopted and that, if adopted, they will not negatively affect our liquidity.
As of December 31, 2015, the Bank had no material commitments for capital expenditures.
The following table sets forth, for the dates indicated, the calculation of our excess capital under the Central Bank’s rules and certain capital and liquidity ratios.
132
2015(4)
2014(4)
2013(4)
Market discipline
The BCRA imposed by Communication “A” 5394 the mandatory publication on the website of the financial institutions of certain information in order to allow market participants to assess the information related to capital, risk exposures, assessment processes risk and capital adequacy of each of them. Financial institutions must provide appropriate information to ensure transparency in the management and measurement of risks and the adequacy of their capital.
This standard applies to the highest level of consolidation of each entity. Information concerning BBVA Francés is available at: https://www.bbvafrances.com.ar/relaciones-inversores/disciplina-mercados.jsp
U.S. and Argentine Banking GAAP Reconciliation
We prepare our Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with Argentine Banking GAAP, which differ from U.S. GAAP in certain respects, as discussed in Note 25 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The differences and the most significant effects on our net income and stockholders’ equity over the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 are described below.
133
Under accounting rule ASC 740-10, Income Taxes: Overall, deferred tax assets or liabilities are recorded for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities at statutory tax rates expected to be in effect when such amounts will be realized. Deferred tax assets are recognized if it is more likely than not that such assets will be realized. As explained in Note 5.1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we applied this method during 2014 to determine the charge for income tax. The adjustments required in order to reconcile assets and liabilities with U.S. GAAP, as detailed in the following paragraph, are shown without considering their effect on income tax. The effect over continued operations of reflecting such adjustments on the Bank’s net assets is increase by Ps.284.5 million, Ps.243.6 million and Ps.265.7 million as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. In addition, income over continued operations would have increased by Ps.224.0 million and Ps.26.4 million as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively and would have decreased by Ps.59.0 million at December 31, 2013. The effect over discontinued operations of reflecting such adjustments on the Bank’s net assets causes them to increase by Ps.17.1 million as of December 31, 2013. On the other hand, income over discontinued operations would have decreased by Ps.17.1 million and Ps.0.3 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Under Argentine Banking GAAP, loan origination and credit card issuance fees are recognized when collected. Under accounting rule ASC 310-20, Receivables: Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs, these fees are recognized over the life of the related loan as an adjustment to yield. The effect of applying U.S. GAAP to continued operations would be to decrease our net income by Ps.169.1 million, Ps.101.3 million and Ps.90.7 million for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The effect of U.S. GAAP treatment would have been to decrease the principal balance of outstanding loans to our Consolidated Financial Statements over continued operations by Ps.505.8 million, Ps.336.7 million and Ps.235.4 million for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. These adjustments do not have effects over discontinued operations.
According to U.S. GAAP, the Bank decided to classify government securities as available for sale and carried at fair value (market value if available) with unrealized gains and losses reported as a net amount, net of income tax within the stockholder’s equity accounts. However, ASC 320-10, Investments-Debt and Equity Securities: Overall, requires that if the decline in fair value is judged to be other than temporary, the cost of the security shall be written down to fair value, and the amount of the write-down shall be included in earnings / (losses). Under BCRA regulations, the securities included in this category are carried at fair values with changes in fair value recognized in net income. The losses or (gains) recognized under U.S. GAAP for securities classified as available for sale are mainly related to realized gains (or losses) for securities at fair values under BCRA regulations (whose results are recognized as losses / gains for the fiscal year). Under U.S. GAAP, the difference between fair value and amortized cost is recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) until the securities are realized. Therefore the results of continued operations under U.S. GAAP mainly correspond to realized gains and losses from the sale of securities, plus interest income on such securities. In addition, under BCRA regulations the bank holds instruments issued by such BCRA at amortized cost. According to U.S. GAAP, the Bank decided to classify these securities as available for sale and carried at fair value (market value if available), with unrealized gains and losses reported as a net amount, net of income tax, within the stockholder’s equity accounts. Had U.S. GAAP been applied, our assets over continued operations would have decreased by Ps.8.6 million, Ps.28.1 million and Ps.7.5 million as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Our net income over continued operations would had decreased by Ps.503.5 and Ps.159.0 million for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and would have increased by Ps.147.9 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. These adjustments do not have effects over discontinued operations.
Under Argentine Banking GAAP, the allowance for loans has been calculated based on the Bank’s estimated loan loss risk in light of debtor compliance and the collateral supporting the respective transactions, as provided by Communication “A” 2950 and supplemented by the Central Bank. ASC 310-10, Receivables: Overall, requires a creditor to measure impairment of a loan based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or at the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. This statement is applicable to all loans (including those restructured in a troubled debt restructuring involving a modification of terms), except large groups of smaller-balance homogenous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment. Had U.S. GAAP been applied over continued operations the Bank’s assets would have increased by Ps.497.9 million, Ps.418.6 million and Ps.307.4 million at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. On the other hand, our income would have increased by Ps.79.2 million, Ps.111.2 million and Ps.109.4 million at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. These adjustments do not have effects over discontinued operations.
Pursuant to Argentine Banking GAAP, at December 31, 2003 the Bank recorded as assets the difference between the paid amounts for constitutional protection actions and the deposit amounts registered in accordance with the existing regulations. The government has not indicated that it will compensate the Bank for the difference between the amounts paid for constitutional protection actions and the deposit amounts registered in accordance with the existing regulations. ASC 450-30, Contingencies: Gain Contingencies, requires that contingencies that might result in gains should not be reflected in the accounts since to do so might be to recognize revenue prior to its realization. Had U.S. GAAP been applied, our assets over continued operations would have decreased by Ps.50.0 million, Ps.37.0 million and Ps.31.0 million at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. On the other hand net income over continued operations would have decreased by Ps.13.0 million, Ps.6.0 million and Ps.1.3 million at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. These adjustments do not have effects over discontinued operations.
134
Under Argentine Banking GAAP the Bank accounted for its investment in the BCBA at market value. Under U.S. GAAP, such investments would have been valued at cost or at a lesser amount where there is a non-temporary impairment in value. Additionally, the companies that are under 20% were valued by the equity method in accordance with Central Bank rules. Under U.S. GAAP, those investments that are non-marketable securities would have been valued at cost. Had U.S. GAAP been applied, the Bank’s assets over continued operations would have decreased by Ps.98.9 million, Ps.61.7 million and Ps.49.7 million at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. On the other hand, the income over continued operations would have decreased by Ps.37.2 million, Ps.12.1 million and Ps.11.5 million at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. These adjustments do not have effects over discontinued operations.
Pursuant to Argentine Banking GAAP, we generally record the cost of vacation payments earned by employees when paid, U.S. GAAP requires that this expense be recorded on an accrual basis as the vacations are earned. If U.S. GAAP had been applied, our liabilities over continued operations would have increased by Ps.0.4 million, Ps.0.5 million and Ps.0.4 million for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Net income over continued operations would have increased by Ps.0.01 million at December 31, 2015 and would have decreased by Ps.0.1 million and Ps.0.04 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. These adjustments do not have effects over discontinued operations.
Pursuant to Argentine Banking GAAP, we do not give accounting recognition to checks drawn against the Bank or otherbanks or other items to be collected, until such time as the related item clears or is accepted. Such items are recorded by the Bank in memorandum accounts. U.S. banks, however, account for such items through balance sheet clearing accounts at the time the items are presented. Had U.S. GAAP been applied, the Bank’s assets and liabilities would have increased by approximately Ps.2,574.4 million and Ps.2,103.5 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Under Argentine Banking GAAP, the Bank recognizes forward and unsettled spot transactions as receivable and payable at the time of the agreement, which reflect the amount of cash, currency or securities to be exchanged at the closing date. The receivable or payable representing the receipt or delivery of securities or currency is stated at the quoted market value of such securities or currency. Under U.S. GAAP, in general entities would not recognize a receivable or payable but would recognize the differences arising from changes in the market price of securities or currency to be received or delivered if the transaction did not qualify as a hedge. Had U.S. GAAP been applied, the Bank’s assets and liabilities would have decreased by approximately Ps.2,226.4 million and Ps.852.2 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Under Argentine Banking GAAP, foreign trade acceptances are not recorded on the balance sheet by the Bank. In accordance with Regulation S-X, acceptances and related customer liabilities should be recorded on the balance sheet. The effect of the adjustmentrequired to state balance sheets in accordance with Regulation S-X would be to increase assets (due from customers on acceptances) and increase liabilities (bank acceptances outstanding) by Ps.511,7 million and Ps.290.7 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
On May 4, 1998, our shareholders approved the reversal of the shares issuance premium related to the capital increase paid on December 19, 1997 and relating to the business goodwill from the acquisition of 71.754% of the capital stock of Banco de Crédito Argentino. Under Argentine Banking GAAP, we recognize the issuance premium under “Issuance premiums” and capitalize the related amount under Intangible assets. The effect of adjustments required to state such amounts in accordance with U.S. GAAP would have been to increase assets over continued operations by Ps.254.9 million for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013. On May 13, 1999, BBVA acquired Corp Banca S.A. and Atuel Fideicomisos S.A. and on September 13, 1999, BBVA sold its interests in both companies to BBVA Francés. For the difference between the definitive price of the transaction and the incorporation value of both companies, the Bank recognized a goodwill and amortized it in proportion to the months of estimated useful life (120-month period). Under U.S. GAAP, we would be required to account for the acquisition of the mentioned companies at BBVA’s book balance. Had U.S. GAAP been applied over continued operations, the Bank’s assets would have increased by Ps.54.7 at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013. ASC 350-20, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other: Goodwill requires, effective January 1, 2002, that goodwill no longer be amortized, but now be subject to an impairment test annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired. Accordingly, we have recognized an impairment loss. Had U.S. GAAP been applied over continued operations our assets would have decreased by Ps.309.6 million as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013. These adjustments do not have effects over discontinued operations.
ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts (collectively referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities. Had U.S. GAAP been applied, the assets over continued operations would have decreased by Ps.1.6 million and liabilities over continued operations would have increased by Ps.31.3 million. At December 31, 2014 the assets and liabilities over continued operations would have increased by Ps.9.7 million and Ps.0.9 million, respectively. At December 31, 2013 the assets and liabilities over continued operations would have increased by Ps.8.2 million and Ps.25.8 million, respectively. On the other hand, income would have decreased by Ps.41.7
135
million and Ps.23.6 million for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2013, respectively, and would have increased by Ps.26.4 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. These adjustments do not have effects over discontinued operations.
As from January 2015 the Bank created a provision of Ps.48.8 million for penalties enforced against it, to comply with the provisions under Communication “A” 5689 of the Argentine Central Bank. Notwithstanding, the Bank does not expect any adverse financial impacts in this respect. Under U.S. GAAP, a provision should be raised when it is probable that a liability had been incurred at the date of the financial statements. Had U.S. GAAP been applied over continued operations, the Bank´s liabilities would have decreased by Ps.48.8 million at December 31, 2015 and income for the fiscal year ended at December 31, 2015 would have increased by Ps.48.8 million. These adjustments do not have effects over discontinued operations.
The Bank discloses its non-controlling interests in consolidated subsidiaries like a caption outside its equity. In accordance with accounting rule ASC 810-10, Consolidation: Overall, non-controlling interests in consolidated subsidiaries shall be reported in the consolidated balance sheets within equity and separately from the parent’s equity. Had U.S. GAAP been applied over continued operations, the Bank’s stockholders’ equity would have increased by Ps.344.0 million, Ps.291.5 million and Ps.203.4 million at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. In addition, income over continued operations for the fiscal years ended at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 would have increased by Ps.52.6 million, Ps.88.0 million and Ps.83.9 million, respectively. Had U.S. GAAP been applied over discontinued operations, the Bank’s stockholders’ equity would have increased by Ps.9.0 million, Ps.3.9 million and Ps.7.1 million at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. In addition, income over discontinued operations for the fiscal year ended at December 31, 2015 would have increased by Ps.5.0 million and would have decreased by Ps.3.1 million and Ps.0.6 million for the fiscal years ended at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP, our net income over continued operations for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 would have been Ps.3,418.9 million, Ps.3,181.7 million and Ps.2,180.2 million, respectively. Under Argentine Banking GAAP, our net income over continued operations was Ps.3,778,6 million, Ps.3,208.2 million and Ps.2,024.9 million for the same respective periods. In addition our net income over discontinued operations applying U.S. GAAP for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 would have been Ps.10.9 million, Ps.(23.9) million and Ps.(1.6) million, respectively. Under Argentine Banking GAAP, our net income over discontinued operations was Ps.5.9 million, Ps.(3.7) million and Ps.(0.7) million for the same respective periods.
Credit Ratings
On September 19, 2013, following the sovereign debt downgrade, Standard & Poor’s further downgraded the Bank ratings. The Program (US$750,000,000) as well as the negotiable obligations issued within the framework of this program and the long term institutional rating were downgraded to “raBB+” with negative outlook from “raA” with negative outlook.
In November 2013, Fitch Ratings sold 70% of its capital stock to a local investor group and changed its name to “Fix SCR”. This new group has been responsible for the Bank´s local rating since then. As of December 31, 2013, Fix SCR made no changes to the Bank´s local ratings and maintained the Bank’s share rating at “1” with negative outlook, its senior long term debt at “AA (arg)” with negative outlook and its short term debt at “A1+ (arg)”.
On August 20, 2014, Standard & Poor’s downgraded the Bank’s rating following the downgrade of the sovereign rating. As a result, BBVA Francés long term institutional rating as well as the negotiable obligations program (US$750,000,000) and Class IV notes were downgraded to “raB+” with negative outlook from “raBB+” with negative outlook, while its short term institutional rating maintained at “raB”.
In February 2016, Standard & Poor’s upgraded the long and short term sovereign debt of Argentina to “B-” and “B”, respectively, from “CCC+” and “C” and the outlook change from negative to neutral reflecting the improvements in terms of macroeconomic policies as well as the challenges that new Administration faces. The Bank’s ratings were also modified. Its long term institutional rating and the negotiable obligations (US$750,000,000) were upgraded to “raBBB” with neutral outlook from “raBB+” and the short term institutional rating was also upgraded to “raA-2”.
In March 2016, Fix SCR upgraded the sovereign rating. This upgrade was driven by the improved consistency and sustainability of Argentina's policy framework, reduced external vulnerability, and the expected liberalization of fiscal financing constraints. These improvements balanced risks related to relatively weak external liquidity, continued macroeconomic underperformance compared with peers, and deterioration of public finances in recent years. Argentina's ratings take into account structural strengths such as GDP per capita and social indicators against a weak debt repayment record.
As a result, Fix SCR also upgraded the Bank’s ratings to “AAA” from “AA” and changed the outlook to neutral from negative.
136
We incur research and development expenses in connection with technology information systems. The amount spent during each of the last three years was not material and we hold no material patents and do not license to others any of our intellectual property. We plan infrastructure development (processing, telecommunications, Internet, information security) based upon present and projected future demand of such services. We acquire the necessary technology, and equipment from third parties.
BBVA Francés believes that the present environment is complex, but at the same time it offers many opportunities. During 2016, the financial system will continue to be focused on further expanding the private sector lending activity, with emphasis in the middle-market and retail segment. However, no assurance can be given that credit demand will remain strong. Our continued success and ability to increase our value to our shareholders will depend, among other factors, upon the economic growth in the Argentine economy and the corresponding growth of the market for long-term private sector lending. For a description of recent changes in our business strategy and a summary of the main consequences of the current economic scenario on our business and future prospects see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Overview”.
We enter into various transactions involving off-balance sheet financial instruments (see Note 24.17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). We use these instruments to meet the risk management, trading and financing needs of clients or for our proprietary trading and asset and liability management purposes. These instruments are subject to varying degrees of credit and market risk. We monitor credit risk and market risk associated with on- and off-balance sheet financial instruments on an aggregate basis.
We use the same credit policies in determining whether to enter or extend call and put option contracts, commitments, conditional obligations and guarantees as we do for granting loans. Our management believes that the outstanding off-balance sheet items do not represent an unusual credit risk.
Derivatives
The market risk of derivatives arises from the potential for changes in value due to fluctuations in market prices. We reduce our exposure to market risk, if necessary, by entering into offsetting transactions in accordance with the hedging global policy defined by the BBVA Group for its subsidiaries. The credit risk of derivatives arises from the potential of a counterparty to default on its contractual obligations. The effect of such a default varies as the market value of derivative contracts changes. Credit exposure exists at a particular point in time when a derivative has a positive market value. We attempt to limit our credit risk by dealing with creditworthy counterparties and obtaining collateral where appropriate. Our activities related to hedging and derivatives transactions in 2015 are explained in Notes 12 and 24.17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Credit Commitments
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer at a future date, subject to compliance with contractual terms. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require the payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent actual future cash requirements for the Bank. The Bank evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. Foreign trade acceptances represent Bank customers’ liabilities on outstanding drafts or bills of exchange that have been accepted by the Bank and the Bank’s liability to remit payment upon the presentation of the accepted drafts or bills of exchange. The credit risk involved in foreign trade acceptances and guarantees granted is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.
Trusts Activities
We act as trustee in several financial trusts established for various purposes. We are in no case personally liable for the liabilities assumed in the performance of the trust obligations. Any liabilities resulting from the trust are satisfied with and up to the full amount of the trust assets or their proceeds.
In addition, we act as trustee in 13 non-financial trusts. We are in no case personally liable for the liabilities assumed in the performance of the contract obligations. Any liabilities are satisfied with and up to the full amount of the trust assets and their proceeds. The non-financial trusts at issue were set up to secure the receivables of several creditors (beneficiaries) and the trustee was entrusted with the management, care, preservation and custody of the trust assets. The trust assets represented about Ps.151.4 million
137
as of December 31, 2015 and mainly consisted of cash, creditors’ rights, real estate and shares. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The following table represents our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of December 31, 2015:
Less than 1 yea
1-3years
4-5years
After 5 years
ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
Directors
The corporate by-laws of BBVA Francés state that the Bank’s management is led by a board of directors consisting of a minimum of three and a maximum of nine directors, who are elected by the shareholders to hold such office for a period of three years and who may be re-elected (the “Board”). The by-laws also provide for the appointment of alternate directors. According to the by-laws, the Board meets at least once per month.
The table below indicates the names of the members of our Board, their present position in the Board, their business background and the date of expiration of the period for which they were elected
138
Name
CurrentTerm Ends
Position as ofDecember 31, 2015
Date of Birth
Present principal occupations and business experience
Jorge Carlos Bledel
Present principal occupations:Director, Rombo Compañía Financiera S.A. (“Rombo Compañía Financiera”).
Business experience:. Director, Credilogros Compañía Financiera S.A.; Credit Manager, Banco del Interior y Buenos Aires; Business Manager, Corporación Metropolitana de Finanzas; Financial Manager, BBVA Francés; Wholesale Banking Director, BBVA Francés; Retail Banking Director, BBVA Francés; Alternate Director Central Puerto S.A.; Regular Director, Sociedad Argentina de Energía S.A.; Alternate Director, Hidroneuquén S.A.; Regular Director, RPM Gas S.A.; Alternate Director, RPU Agropecuaria S.A.; Alternate Director, Gasinvest S.A.; Regular Director, RPE Distribucion S.A.; Vice Chairman, PB Distribucion S.A.
Mr. Bledel joined the staff of BBVA Francés in 1986 and was first elected to the Board in March 2003.
José Manuel Tamayo Pérez
Vice Chairman
1º
Present principal occupation:Director, BBVA Francés.
Business experience:Retail Banking Director, BBVA Francés; Marketing Director for Spain and Portugal, BBVA.
Mr. Tamayo Pérez was elected Director in April 2007.
2º
Present principal occupations:Director, Francés Valores; Vice Chairman, PSA Finance; Director, Rombo Compañía Financiera, Vice Chairman of the Administration Board BBVA Francés.
Business experience:Corporate Assistant Manager, BBVA Francés; Wholesale Banking Assistant Manager, BBVA Francés; Asset Management Director, BBVA Francés; Financial Director, BBVA Francés.
Mr. Canestri joined the Bank in 1973 and was first elected to the Board in September 2001.
139
Position as ofDecember 31, 2014
Present principal occupations outside BBVA Francés and business experience
Mario Luis Vicens
Director
Present principal occupation:Director PSA Finance Argentina Compañía Financiera S.A., Director Rombo Compañía Financiera S.A; Member of Administration Board BBVA Francés.
Business experience:Executive Chairman, Asociación de Bancos de la Argentina (ABA); Regular Director, Seguros de Depósitos S.A. (SEDESA); Regular Director, Federación Latinoamericana de Bancos Felaban; Regular Director, Banco Sudameris; Regular Director, BCRA; Planning Assistant Manager and Deputy General Manager, Banco de Crédito Argentino S.A.; Chief Economist – Head of Department; BCRA.
Mr. Vicens was elected Director in 2012.
Present principal occupations:Independent Director Zurich Argentina Cia. de Seguros S.A. and Zurich Argentina Cia. de Reaseguros S.A.
Independent Consultant.
Business experience: International Partner, Arthur Andersen, Pistrelli Díaz y Asoc. for twenty years; Partner in charge of Financial Services Division, Arthur Andersen Latin America and Argentina and Executive member of the Committee of Financial Services.
Mr. Castro was elected Director in 2003.
Business experience:President, BBVA Colombia S.A.; Regional Director, BBVA.
Mr. Juango Fitero was elected Director in 2008.
At the present date, all the members of the Board qualify as independent directors according to the independence criteria set forth by General Resolution No. 622 of the CNV.
The Ordinary and Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting dated April 26, 2016 elected Gabriel Milstein in substitution of Mario Luis Vicens as Regular Director and Alternate Directors Alfredo Castillo Triguero; Juan Manuel Ballesteros and Javier Pérez Cardete as Alternate Directors.
Senior Management
As described below, the main members of our senior management make up the Management Committee. The table below shows the names of the members of the Management Committee who have been our executive officers during 2015 and the year of their appointment to such position, as well as their business background. The senior managers are appointed for an indefinite period.
140
First Appointed
Current Position
Background and Work Experience
Martín Ezequiel Zarich (*)
04/09/1964
Other positions currently held: Director, Francés Valores; Director, BBVA Seguros and Member of the Administration Board BBVA Francés.
Work Experience: Alternate Director BBVA Francés; Director of Innovation and Development, Economist, Banco de Crédito Argentino; Management Control and Budget Manager, Banco de Crédito Argentino; Planning Director, Banco de Crédito Argentino; Merger Director, BBVA Francés; Planning Director, BBVA Francés; Financial Director, BBVA Francés; Retail Banking Director, BBVA Francés; Director, Credilogros; Director, BBVA Banco Francés Uruguay; Deputy General Director, Business Development BBVA Group; Sub deputy director general development of the business of the group BBVA; Management control manager and budget, Banco de Crédito Argentino; Director of planning, control of management and economics Banco de Crédito Argentino.
Mr. Zarich joined the Bank in 1987.
Ignacio Sanz y Arcelus
Director, Finance and Planning
Financial Area – Technology and Operations Director, BBVA; Asset and Liability for Latin America Director, BBVA; Management Control and Investment Banking (Treasury, Capital Markets, Brokerage, Corporate, Structured Finance) Director, BBVA; Corporate Director, BBVA; Treasury, Capital Markets and International Network, Director, BEX Argentaria BBVA; Market Risk Audit, Director, BEX Argentaria BBVA; Audit Director Central Services, BEX; Planning, Intervention and Control Director SERFINBEX; Director, BEX Argentaria BBVA; Team Leader, Arthur Andersen Auditors S.A.
Mr. Sanz y Arcelus joined the Bank in 2012.
Director, Digital Banking & Transformation
Innovation and Business Model Manager, BBVA Francés; Manager of investment goods insurance and property services, BBVA Francés; Head Portfolio Manager, BBVA Francés; Wholesale Banking Analyst, BBVA Francés; Personal Banking Officer, BBVA Francés.
Mr. Bledel Joined the bank in May 1, 2010.
Design and Development Manager Technology and Operations, BBVA; Information Technology Manager – Media, BBVA; Media Director, BBVA Uruguay; Planning and Information Security Media Manager, BBVA Francés; Information Security Manager, Banco de Crédito Argentino.
Mr. Siciliano joined the bank in November 25, 1996.
Regional Manager, Sucursal Citibank, Citicorp; Regional Manager of Local Branches, Banco de Crédito Argentino; General Manager, Easy-Bank (BBVA Francés); General Manager and Vice President, BBVA Banco Uruguay; Companies Banking Manager, BBVA Francés.
Mr. Luna joined the Bank in 1996.
141
Director of Technology and Operations, BBVA; Coordinator, Systems and Organizations, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro; Systems Coordinator, Banco Galicia; Manager of Organization and Systems Development, Banco de Crédito Argentino; Design and Development Manager, Banco Francés; Media Director, Banco Francés; Director of Design and Development América, BBVA; Business Partner America, BBVA.
Mr. Fernández joined the Bank in 1995.
Regional Director for Global Transaction Banking LATAM, BBVA; General Manager, AL-Rajhi Bank; Free-lance consultant at Riyadh KSA Buenos Aires; General Director, Citigroup Miami; Regional Chief for Latin America, Citigroup Miami; Head of Regional Sales, Citigroup Buenos Aires.
Mr. Elizalde joined the bank in March 21, 2011.
South América BBVA Retail Banking Director; South América BBVA Wholesale Banking Director; BBVA Francés Retail Risks Manager; BBVA Francés Wholesales and Corporate Manager; BBVA Francés Admission and Control Manager; BBVA Francés Control and Operational Risks Manager; Rombo Compañía Financiera S.A Director; PSA Finance Argentina Compañía Financiera S.A Director; Banco de Crédito Argentino Portfolio Control Manager; Senior Investment Banking officer.
Mr. Fiandrino first joined the Bank in 1992.
(*)On January 11, 2016 Mr. Martín Zarich was appointed as General Manager of BBVA Francés upon proper authorization issued by the Central Bank through Resolution No. 9 dated January 7, 2016. Mr. Ricardo Moreno held office as General Manager until such date.
The service agreements of the directors and the executive officers of the Bank do not provide for benefits upon termination of employment except as described in “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—B. Compensation” below.
The Bank has a Nomination and Remunerations Committee which was created on March 30, 2009. Its members must be Directors with no executive functions, and the majority of its members must be “independent”. Its main functions are to provide assistance to the Board in all issues regarding compensation policies and other benefits. Moreover, it is also in charge of stating the terms and conditions for the selection and hiring of the key principal executives of the company. As of December 31, 2015 and the date hereof it consists of (i) Oscar Miguel Castro; (ii) Marcelo Gustavo Canestri; (iii) José Manuel Tamayo Pérez; (iv) Gustavo Fernández and (v) Adrián Bressani.
The aggregate amount of compensation paid by the Bank and its subsidiaries during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, to all directors and officers for services in all capacities, including salaries and bonuses, was Ps.94.2 million. This amount also included compensation accrued during 2014 and paid in 2015. Compensation in the amount of Ps.42.8 million accrued during 2015 and was fully paid in 2016. We hereby confirm that disclosure of the Directors individual compensations is not required under the Argentine law. Moreover, Argentine legislation requires approval of a total amount of Director’s compensation in the Annual Ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting.
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, the Bank did not pay any amount as contribution to pension plans (see Note 24.14 to our Consolidated Financial Statements).
142
Our corporate governance system is based on the distribution of functions between the Board and the several committees described below.
Supervisory Committee
The primary responsibilities of the Supervisory Committee are to monitor the management’s compliance with Argentine Corporate Law, the by-laws, the Bank’s internal regulations, if any, and the shareholders’ resolutions, and to perform other functions, including, but not limited to: (i) attending meetings of the Board, Management Committee and shareholders meetings, (ii) calling extraordinary shareholders’ meetings when deemed necessary and ordinary and special shareholders’ meetings when not called by the Board, and (iii) investigating written complaints of shareholders. In performing these functions, the Supervisory Committee does not control our operations or assess the merits of the decisions made by the directors.
The Supervisory Committee has unlimited access to our books and registers and a right to request as much information as necessary for the performance of its duties.
At the General Ordinary and Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting of BBVA Francés held on April 7, 2015, the following members of the Supervisory Committee were appointed:
Expiration of term
As of December 31, 2015, both the regular and alternate members of the Bank’s Supervisory Committee, in their capacity as lawyers, had represented to the Bank that: (a) they perform or are prepared to perform the function of legal advisors with the professional independence required by Technical Resolution No. 15 of the Argentine Federation of Professional Councils in Economic Sciences; (b) they are members of Biscardi & Asociados S.R.L. and qualify as “independent” according to General Resolution No. 622 (New Text 2013), and (c) they have filed all the information required by the mentioned dispositions of the CNV, regarding their professional relations with the Bank.
On December 31, 2015, Mr. Marcelino Agustín Cornejo resigned from his position as regular member of the Supervisory Committee and Mr. Agustín Isola was appointed as a regular member. This appointed was confirmed by the Ordinary and Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting dated April 26, 2016, which also elected Gonzalo Vidal Devoto as alternate member in substitution of Agustín Isola.
At the General Ordinary and Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting of BBVA Francés held on April 26, 2016 the above mentioned other members of the Supervisory Committee were appointed for a new period, which expires on December 31, 2016.
Below is some background information of the current members of the Supervisory Committee
143
Director in: GMS Management Solutions S.A.; as alternate Director in: Tecnoespumas S.A. and Molding Tex S.A. and as regular liquidator of Plas Alco Argentina S.A. (undergoing liquidation proceedings).
There are no agreements between the Bank and its directors, members of the Supervisory Committee or main executives, as a consequence of which the directors, members of the Supervisory Committee or main executives might have interests in opposition to those of the Bank, according to the provisions of Article 272 of the Argentine Business Companies Law (“LC”).
Audit Committee (I)
144
On February 24, 2015, BBVA Francés established the Audit Committee (I) as described in the minutes of the Board of Directors No. 5152 to comply with the provisions set out by the Central Bank in its Communication “A” 5042, as supplemented, dated February 2010.
As of this date, the Audit Committee (I) is comprised of the following members:
Members: Marcelo Gustavo Canestri
Alberto Muñiz
Permanent Assistants to the Committee: Jorge Luna; Ignacio Sanz y Arcelus and Adrián Bressani .
The Audit Committee (I) meets once a month. In each of these meetings, the Internal Audit Director presents the projects undertaken by the Internal Audit Department. The minutes of the meeting are then drafted detailing the issues discussed as well as those items requiring further discussion. The minutes are transcribed into an internal control book which is sent to the Board of Directors for their information.
The Audit Committee (I)’s duties are to:
Audit Committee (II) (as per Law No.26,831 which complies with NYSE Listing Standards)
According to Board’s resolution dated May 18, 2010, BBVA Francés has an Audit Committee (II), whose current composition is as follows:
Members: José Manuel Tamayo Pérez
Oscar Miguel Castro
Marcelo Gustavo Canestri
145
According to Section 303A.07(b) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, all of the members of this Audit Committee must be “independent”. Moreover, according to Decree Law No. 26,831 the Audit Committee (II) must consist of at least three members of the Board, the majority of whom should be independent directors. All the members of the Audit Committee (II) qualify as an independent director according to the independence criteria set forth by General Resolution No. 622 of the CNV, The powers and duties of the Audit Committee (II) are as follows:
All directors, members of the Supervisory Committee, managers and external auditors must, at the request of the Audit Committee (II), attend its sessions and cooperate with it, facilitating its access to such information as may be available to them. In order to ensure a more appropriate exercise of the powers and duties contemplated herein, the committee may request the advice of lawyers and other independent professionals and retain their services for the account of the company within the budget allocated for such purposes by the shareholders meeting. The Audit Committee (II) shall have access to such information and documentation as it may deem necessary in order to comply with its obligations.
Nomination and Remunerations Committee
The Nomination and Remunerations Committee was created on March 30, 2009. Its members as of the date hereof are:
Gustavo Fernández
Adrián Bressani
Its main purpose is to provide information and advice regarding the nomination and compensations of Directors and Executive Officers. Its main functions are to:
146
Special Committees
The Bank has the following special committees (i) Management Committee, (ii) Computer Technology Committee (iii) Disclosure Committee; (iv) Asset Laundering and Terrorism Financing Prevention Committee and (iv) Regulatory Compliance Committee, among others.
As of December 31, 2015 the Management Committee consisted of: (i) Ricardo Enrique Moreno, (ii) Martín Ezequiel Zarich, (iii) Jorge Luna, (iv) Jorge Alberto Bledel, (v) Gustavo Fernández, (vi) Ignacio Sanz y Arcelus (vii) Gerardo Fiandrino, (viii) Gustavo Siciliano, (ix) Carlos Elizalde and (x) Gustavo Alonso.
On January 11, 2016 Mr. Martín Zarich was appointed as General Manager of the Bank, upon proper authorization issued by the Central Bank through Resolution No. 9 dated January 7, 2016. Mr. Ricardo Enrique Moreno held office as General Manager until that date.
The obligations of the Management Committee are to: (i) fix the business and investment strategies, the general risks policies, the human resources policies and cooperate with the General Manager; (ii) delegate powers to other officers; (iii) analyze and approve the general annual budget; (iv) monitor its evolution and determine corrective measures according to internal and market variables and (v) create business synergies with other companies of the group.
The Management Committee meets monthly.
The Computer Technology Committee is responsible for the institutional treatment of the policies, goals and planning of the information systems area, and currently and as of December 31, 2015, consists of: (i) Gustavo Siciliano, (ii) Rubén Stempellato, (iii) Marcelo Gustavo Canestri, (iv) Daniel Neme and (v) María Susana Dopazo Tomey.
The Computer Technology Committee meets quarterly.
As of December 31, 2015 and currently, the Disclosure Committee consists of: (i) the Financial Planning Director Ignacio Sanz y Arcelus; (ii) Independent Director, Oscar Miguel Castro; (iii) the Legal Services Director, Adrián Bressani; (iv) the Audit Director, Alberto Muñiz Zurita; (v) the Accounting Manager, Mónica Etcheverry; (vi) the Planning and Efficiency Manager, Jaquelina Kuscich; (vii) the Secretary for Investors Relations, Vanesa Bories; (viii) Investor Relations Analyst Cecilia Acuña; (ix) the Risks Director, Gerardo Fiandrino and the Institucional Area of Legal Services Manager, Rocío Carreras.
The general functions of the Disclosure Committee are to make sure that all information supplied to the Bank’s shareholders, the markets where its shares are listed and the regulatory bodies of such markets is true and complete, adequately represents its financial situation and the results of its operations and is communicated in compliance with the terms and other requirements of the applicable regulations and with general market operation and good corporate governance principles. It must therefore ensure the existence and maintenance by the Bank of procedures and controls regarding the preparation and content of all information included in the financial statements as well as of any accounting or financial information which must be registered with the CNV and other regulatory bodies and agents of the stock exchanges where the shares of BBVA Francés are listed.
The Disclosure Committee meets quarterly.
147
As of December 31, 2015 and currently, the Asset Laundering and Terrorism Financing Prevention Committee consists of: two Directors, Mario Luis Vicens, who is the Compliance Officer on Money Laundering Prevention before the Anti-Money Laundering Organism (“Unidad de Información Financiera”), and Marcelo Gustavo Canestri, the Director in charge of the Regulatory Compliance Area, Walter Vallini; manager in Regulatory Compliance; and the Official in charge of Money Laundering Prevention Area, Adriana Scorza.
In order to comply with its control and prevention purposes, the Terrorism Assets and Money Laundering Prevention Committee assumes the following responsibilities:
Each member assumes the following functions:
The Terrorism Asset Laundering and Financing Committee meets every three months, or extraordinarily whenever the coordinator should deem it convenient due to the existence of relevant matters to be discussed.
Not fewer than five business days in advance of the meeting shall the Regulatory Compliance Director discuss with the secretary the subjects to be treated at the quarterly meeting, and the Secretary will submit the agenda to the members of the Committee
This committee consists of three regular Directors, the Executive Director, the Compliance Director, the Retail Banking Director, the Planning and Financial Area Director and the Legal Services Director. The Records Office shall be under the supervision of the Institutional Area of the Legal Services Department.
The main functions of this Regulatory Compliance Committee are to:
148
This committee is integrated by the Executive Director or General Manager, the Risks Director, the Validations and Internal Audit Manager, the Retail Risk Manager, the Corporate and Wholesale Risks Manager, all of them as permanent participants; the Financial and Reporting Risks Manager and the Recoveries Manager as optional participants or for specific matters; and the Responsible for Global Management and Technical Office and the responsible for the area which shall deal with the issue to be discussed and speaker as specific participants.
The main purpose of the Risks Management Committee is to:
This committee consists of the Risks Director, the Validations and Internal Audit Manager, the Retail Risk Manager and the Corporate and Wholesale Risks Manager as permanent participants, as well as the Financial and Reporting Risks Manager and the Recoveries Manager as optional participants or for specific matters, and the Responsible for Global Management and Technical Office the Responsible for the area which shall deal with the issue to be discussed and speaker as specific participants.
This Committee analyses operations for a maximum amount of US$ 40 million and its main functions are:
149
As of December 31, 2015 and as of the current date, the Corporate Assurance Committee consists of the Executive Director as Chairman, the members of the Management Committee as permanent participants and the Secretary of the Committee, which is the Audit Director.
The main functions of this committee are:
Meetings of the Corporate Assurance Committee shall be ordinary and extraordinary. The former, will be held on a quarterly basis, summoned in advance by the Secretary. The latter, will be held when summoned by the Secretary or upon the request of one or more members of the Committee, whenever special circumstances are so require it.
Also in compliance with resolutions of the Central Bank or other controlling bodies, the Bank has appointed different offices responsible for specific subjects, as detailed below:
150
Main Officer Responsible: Mr. Manuel Mansilla
Alternate Officer Responsible: Mr. Gustavo Viturro
Main Officer Responsible: Daniel Neme
Alternate Officer Responsible: Mr. José Luis Frete
Main Responsible: José Roberto Adragna
Alternate Responsible: Magdalena Barberis
Mr. Diego Cesarini
Main Officer Responsible: Mr. Ignacio Sanz y Arcelus
Alternate Officer Responsible: Mr. Gustavo Fabián Alonso
Main Officer Responsible: Ignacio Sanz y Arcelus
Alternate Officers Responsible: Mr. Martín Ezequiel Zarich, Mr. Adrián Bresssani
Mr. Mario Luis Vicens
Main: Bernardo Alejandro Guaita
Alterante: Claudio Adolfo Varela
Advisors
All internal legal advice is provided to the Bank by its own Legal Services Department.
The Bank has no financial advisors.
External Auditors
Since October 1, 2002, Deloitte & Co. S.R.L. (currently, Deloitte & Co. S.A.) acts as the Bank’s external auditor. The last appointment was approved by the Ordinary and Extraordinary Shareholders Meetings held on April 26, 2016.
According to the provisions of General Resolution No. 622 of the CNV (New Text 2013), the auditor of the financial statements for the fiscal year closing on December 31, 2015 was Marcelo Alberto Bastante, National Public Accountant (Buenos Aires University) who is registered with the Professional Council of Economic Sciences of the City of Buenos Aires, Volume 235, Page 46, and the appointed Alternate Auditor was Alberto Adolfo Allemand, who is registered with the Professional Council of Economic Sciences of the City of Buenos Aires, Volume 103, Page 223. The Ordinary and Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting held on April 26, 2016 reelected Marcelo Alberto Bastante who is registered with the Professional Council of Economic Sciences of the City of Buenos Aires, Volume 235, Page 46 for the fiscal year closing on December 31, 2016, and Mr. Allemand as alternate auditor for the same period.
The firm Deloitte & Co. S.A. has its domicile at Florida 234, 5th floor (C1005AAF), City of Buenos Aires, Argentina and is registered with the Professional Council in Economic Sciences of the City of Buenos Aires, under Volume 1, Page 3.
The following table shows the breakdown of our full-time payroll employees as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013:
151
Our employees are represented by a national bank union with optional membership. As of December 31, 2015, 2,038 employees were unionized. The union negotiates a collective bargaining agreement to establish minimum salaries for all of its members. We have not experienced any conflicts with the union for over 20 years and we consider relations with our employees to be satisfactory.
We have a personnel Training and Development Department, which is in charge of the training of all of the Bank’s employees. This includes in-house training courses and seminars in all the areas: Operations, Technology and Business (Branches, Corporate Banking). We provide bonuses to individual employees throughout the bank on a discretionary basis, taking into consideration individual merit and overall profit levels. We do not have a formal profit-sharing plan.
As of March 31, 2016, Marcelo Gustavo Canestri (Vice Chairman 2º) and Gustavo Osvaldo Fernández (Human Resources Director) own shares in BBVA Francés. The ownership of each of them represented less than 1% of the capital stock of the Bank. The shares owned by these persons do not have different voting rights.
None of our directors or our remaining senior executives own shares or options on shares of BBVA Francés.
ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our ordinary shares as of December 31, 2015, by each person who, to our knowledge, beneficially own more than 5% of our ordinary shares. These persons do not have different voting rights.
(1) As holder agent of ADSs.
On March 26, 2012, the Ordinary and Extraordinary General Shareholders’ Meetings of BBVA Francés and Otar approved the preliminary merger agreement, for which the Bank approved the increase in capital stock by issuing 50,410,182 book-entry, ordinary shares with a par value of Ps.1 each and 1 vote per share. In addition, immediately after the above-mentioned capital increase, BBVA Francés would redeem the 50,410,182 book-entry, ordinary shares, with a par value of Ps.1 each and right to 1 vote each that it owns subject to the previous capital stock reduction stemming from the merger.
On July 18, 2013, the BCRA resolved not to make any observations against the merger by absorption of Otar by BBVA Francés through its Resolution No. 473. On August 8, 2013, the CNV approved the merger by absorption in accordance with Section 82 of the Argentine Companies Law pursuant to its Resolution No. 17,155. On March 27, 2014, the merger was registered with the Supervisory Board of Companies (IGJ) under No. 5,302 of Book 68 of Stock Corporations. Finally, 50,410,182 book-entry, ordinary shares with par value Ps.1 each and 1 vote per share of BBVA Francés were redeemed and 50,410,182 book-entry, ordinary shares with par value Ps.1 each and 1 vote per share of BBVA Francés were simultaneously issued and delivered in exchange to Otar’s former shareholders.
Accordingly, our capital stock at December 31, 2015 was 536,877,850 shares and BBVA maintained its equity interest in the Bank at 75.95%.
On January 4, 2012 BBVA Francés was notified of the registration in the Public Registry of Commerce of Madrid of the merger between Bilbao Vizcaya América B.V. and BBV América SL, in its capacity as successor company. The merger has been carried out as part of a corporate reorganization plan of the Group. Also for a description of the merger between BBVA Francés and Inversora Otar S.A. see “Item 4. Information on the Company – A. History and Development of the Company”.
152
We are a corporation registered under Argentine law whose shareholders restrict their liability to the shares they have subscribed and paid-in under the Business Companies Law. Therefore, and in terms of Law No. 25,738, no shareholder of the Bank, whether foreign or local, is liable beyond such paid-in shares for obligations deriving from transactions made by the Bank.
Except as described above, we are unaware of any arrangements the operation of which may, at a subsequent date, result in a change of control of BBVA Francés.
As of December 31, 2015, according to our records 12 holders of ordinary shares and 78 registered holders of ADSs (in accordance with the records of BoNY, as depositary for the ADSs) have an address in the United States representing 10.26% of our issued and outstanding ordinary shares.
The following table presents the loans granted, guarantees given and extensions of credit granted (unused portions) to related parties for the three-month period ended March 31, 2016 and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. Related parties include controlled companies, controlling shareholders and entities under common control, key management and directors and associated entities.
The loans described below (a) were made in the ordinary course of business, (b) were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons, and (c) did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.
153
LargestOutstandingAmount (1)(2)
InterestRates
AmountOutstanding (2)
LargestOutstanding Amount (1)(2)
154
The transactions included in this section (a) were made in the ordinary course of business, (b) were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons, and (c) did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.
155
As of December 31, 2015, the Bank did not have outstanding any financial assistance from BBVA.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
See “Item 3. Key information—Selected Financial Data” and “Item 18. Financial Statements” and other financial information filed with this annual report.
Dividends
The Bank has in place an earnings distribution policy in line with the Bank’s vocation for sustained stockholder value that at the same time allows the Bank’s financial condition to perform favorably so as to strive for business growth and the maintenance of consistently high liquidity and solvency standards in compliance with currently applicable rules and regulations. According to Communication “A” 5485 dated October 4, 2013 of the Central Bank, such distribution must have the prior authorization of the Central Bank and none of the following situations may have occurred during the month immediately preceding the request for authorization made to the Superintendence of Financial and Exchange Institutions:
Communications “A” 5272 dated February 1, 2012, “A” 5827 dated November 10, 2015 and “A” 5273 of the Central Bank increased the capital requirements for financial institutions that carry out activities in Argentina. These Communications require certain capital levels in order to support operational risks, and require for the distribution of dividends an additional conservation buffer equivalent to 75% of the total capital requirements. Because of these new requirements, the Bank was not able to distribute dividends for the 2012 fiscal year.
Moreover, Communication “A” 5694 of the Central Bank sets a new core capital requirement of 1% of assets qualified by risk (APR) for systemic institutions with gradual implementation from 2016 until 2019, however immediately applicable to effects distribution of results.
Additionally, according to Communication “A” 5689 from the Central Bank, dated January 8, 2015, financial institutions must deduct form the possible dividend distribution amount any fine enforced by the Central Bank, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Unit of Anti Money Laundering.
In accordance with the above mentioned Communications, a dividend distribution for Ps.400,000 was approved by the Shareholders Meeting held on April 7, 2015 subject to the prior authorization by the BCRA for the fiscal year 2014. On February 2, 2016, the Bank was notified of Resolution No. 52 dated January 29, 2016, whereby the Central Bank authorized dividends distribution
156
by the Bank for a total amount Ps.400,000. The Board of Directors decided at the meeting held on March 1, 2016 that the payment of such dividends shall take place as from March 18, 2016.
Based on the Bank’s results of operations for the fiscal year 2015, the Board of Directors resolved to propose a cash dividend payment to the shareholders in the amount of Ps.900 million at the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting. Such payment was approved at the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting held on April 26, 2016 and it is subject to BCRA´s prior authorization.
For a description of the declared dividends that we have paid on our ordinary shares and ADSs for the years 2011 to 2015, see “Item 3. Key Information—Declared Dividends”.
ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING
We were one of the first companies listed on the BCBA quoting since 1888. Currently our shares are listed on the BCBA under the ticker FRAN. Since 1993 our shares have also been listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) in the form of American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”) under the ticker BFR and, since December 1999, our shares have also been listed on the Madrid Stock Exchange under the ticker XBFR. We cannot give assurance that a public market in the United States for the ADSs will continue to exist.
The table below shows the quarterly high and low closing prices of the ordinary shares in pesos on BCBA for the periods indicated. The following prices have not been adjusted for any stock dividends.
Pesos Per Ordinary Share (1)
High
Low
Source: BCBA.
The ordinary shares trade on the NYSE in the form of ADSs issued by The Bank of New York Mellon, as depositary. Each ADS represents three ordinary shares. The table below shows the quarterly high and low closing prices of the ADSs in dollars on the NYSE for the periods indicated.
157
US$ Per ADS (1)
Trading on the BCBA
There are nine exchanges in Argentina, of which five have affiliated stock markets and, accordingly, are authorized to quote publicly offered securities: BCBA, Rosario, Córdoba, Mendoza and Santa Fe. The oldest and largest of these exchanges is the BCBA, which was founded in 1854. Usually, the overwhelming majority of all Argentine equity trades take place on the BCBA.
As of December 31, 2015, the shares of 99 Argentine companies, excluding mutual funds, were listed on the BCBA. During the year 2015, the total volume traded on the exchange raised 87% in comparison with the volume of previous year. All publicly offered securities may be traded on authorized securities exchanges and, except for equity securities, in the Argentine over-the-counter market or MAE. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—The Argentine Banking System and its Regulatory Framework—Capital Markets”.
The MERVAL, which is affiliated with the BCBA, is the largest stock market in Argentina. The MERVAL is a corporation which regulates its members (all of whom are stockholders of the corporation) and transactions conducted on that market. Only stockholders of the MERVAL are allowed to effect transactions either as principal or as agent in that stock market. In 1990, brokerage houses, including bank subsidiaries, were allowed to enter as full members of the market. Trading in the MERVAL is conducted through three different trading systems:
The operations at the traditional auction system (“the Floor”) start from 11:00 A.M. and end at 5:00 P.M. each business day. Also available is an electronic auction system called “SINAC” where each broker inputs both its buys and sells while the system matches the operations. Since July 1998, both auction systems (the Floor and SINAC) have been considered to be a single market. Both systems allow for the trade of securities, public bonds, private bonds, futures and derivatives.
Additionally, the Buenos Aires Stock Market’s trades are made through an electronic Continuous Market System (the “Continuous”) that operates from 11:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. each business day. The Continuous is a system that registers and makes public trades that were privately arranged by registered brokers and brokerage companies on behalf of their clients. In this system only public and private bonds may be traded. Such trades are reported on the “Mercado Abierto”, an electronic reporting system similar to, but different from, the Continuous Market System. To control price volatility, the BCBA operates a system which suspends dealing in shares and bonds of a particular issuer for 30 minutes or less when changes in the price of such shares exceed or fall more than 10% of the preceding day’s closing share price. From then on, the BCBA suspends trading for a few minutes when prices rise or fall an
158
additional 5% or more in the same day. In both markets, the operations can be executed in pesos or dollars from local accounts or foreign accounts.
As of December 31, 2015, the market capitalization of the 99 companies listed on the BCBA was approximately US$336.8 billion. At the same time, the market capitalization of the domestic companies totaled US$74.6 billion.
The following table summarizes certain historical information about the BCBA.
Market Regulation
In November 2012, the Argentine Congress passed Law No. 26,831 (the “Securities Law”), which abrogated Law No. 17,811, enacted in 1968. In July 2013, the Argentine Executive Branch issued implementing Decree 1023/2013, and in September 2013, the Argentine Securities Commission, which is the governmental agency that supervises the securities market (Comisión Nacional de Valoresor “CNV”), issued a new set of rules further implementing and administering the requirements of the Securities Law (General Resolution 622/2013 and, together, the “CNV Rules”).
The objectives of the Securities Law are, among others, the promotion of the participation in the securities market of small investors, including retail investors, trade unions, chambers of commerce, professional organizations, and SMEs; the strengthening of the mechanisms to protect and prevent abuses against such investors and the simplification of the mechanisms by which persons trade on the market.
Until the enactment of the Securities Law, the Argentine securities market was regulated by Law No. 17,811. Law No. 17,811 was amended in several occasions. In 2001, Decree No. 677/2001 introduced important changes to address aspects relating to transparency in the public offering regime, such as insider trading and market manipulation. Decree 677/2001 also broadened the supervisory powers of the CNV.
The Securities Law introduced other important amendments, the most important of which are: (i) the end of the Argentine securities market’s self-regulation; (ii) the new categories of licenses for participants in the public offering regime; (iii) the new powers conferred on the CNV; and (iv) the mandatory tender offer rules.
The Securities Law brought to an end the self-regulation of the Argentine securities market. Pursuant to Law No. 17,811 and ancillary legislation, in order to trade on a market, broker dealers had to be shareholders of the self-regulated organization (“SRO”) that operated such market. Accordingly, in the city of Buenos Aires, the only persons authorized to trade securities listed on the BCBA were the shareholders of the Buenos Aires Stock Market (Mercado de Valores de Buenos Aires), the entity overseeing brokerage activities and transactions on the Buenos Aires Stock Market. Likewise, for persons to trade securities on Mercado Abierto Electrónico(“MAE”; basically an electronic system to which broker dealers are linked), they had to be shareholders of such entity. While these entities supervised their participants, the CNV, in turn, supervised the entities.
The Securities Law expressly provides that stock exchanges and other securities markets may no longer impose as a requirement for membership to be a shareholder of the relevant exchange or market. It also establishes that markets must be organized as public companies (i.e. with listed shares), excluding other types of companies or civil associations.
Moreover, the CNV now directly authorizes, revokes the authorization of, regulates and supervises the securities markets, as well as any individuals and companies that in any manner participate in the public offering of securities. Accordingly, the indirect regulation through SROs is abandoned.
159
The Securities Law sets several types of licenses for persons and companies already engaged, or wishing to engage, in the public offering of securities. Regarding the former, such as stock brokers or MAE broker dealers that already hold a license, the CNV Rules granted until March 2014 for them to choose among the new set of licenses and adjust to the requirements for each of them, with longer periods of time available to comply with certain specific requirements such as mandatory minimum capital requirements.
New types of licenses include the following: Negotiating Agents (Agentes de Negociación–AN), for companies that wish to engage in the primary and secondary offer of securities; Liquidation and Compensation Agents (Agentes de Liquidación y Compensación–ALyC), for companies that, in addition to the primary and secondary offer of securities, wish to participate in the settlement of transactions; Soliciting Agents (Agentes Productores–AP), which allows individuals and companies to solicit clients for referral to either an AN or ALyC; Capital Market Advisors (Agentes Asesores de Mercados de Capitales–AA), for individuals or companies giving advice to the public relating to the capital markets; and Selling Agents (Agentes de Corretaje de Valores Negociables–ACVN), for ANs, ALyCs and other authorized participants to act as intermediaries among sellers and buyers through electronic platforms.
There are also specific licenses to act as central securities depositories Collective Deposit Agents (Agente de Depósito Colectivo–ADC); or perform certain of their related activities Custody and Payment Agents (Agente de Custodia, Registro y Pago–ACRyP).
Regarding rating agencies, the Securities Law introduces the possibility for public universities to act as such, and therefore there are two categories in this area: Rating Agents (Agentes de Calificación de Riesgo–ACR) and Public University Rating Agents (Agentes de Calificación de Riesgo–Universidades Públicas).
Regarding collective investments, including investment funds as well as trusts, the Securities Law maintains a similar scheme of licenses, extending the requirement imposed on other non-banking entities to register with the CNV on banks, to act as financial trustees.
Finally, the Securities Law requires that all employees of registered entities who deal with the public, whether due to the provision of advisory services or any services, must be registered in a special registry to be kept by the CNV (Registry of Competent Agents or Registro de Idóneos), and, among others, complete the training programs mandated by the CNV.
The CNV directly regulates, supervises and disciplines individuals and companies that in any manner participate in the public offering of securities. The indirect regulations through SROs are abandoned.
As it was under Law No. 17,811, the CNV authorizes the public offering of securities, and keeps record of companies authorized to publicly offer their securities. Also, the CNV will now keep a registry, and grant, suspend or revoke the authorization to operate, of the markets (which governing rules will also approve), of licensed agents, and of any other persons or companies that because of their activities are under the CNV supervision.
The CNV, in addition to the power it already had of controlling the companies authorized to publicly offer their securities, assumes the power of controlling companies which hold the licenses described in the above section. The CNV must carry on the permanent supervision of such companies, approving any amendments to their by-laws, variations of their capital, and their dissolution and liquidation.
The CNV enforces the Securities Law, with the power to impose sanctions. The CNV may declare acts which are under its supervision null and void, without the need of prior administrative proceedings, when such acts were contrary to the Securities Law. The reviewing courts of the decisions of the CNV will be the administrative law courts instead of the commercial courts.
In carrying out its duties, the CNV may, inter alia, request information, conduct inspections and investigations, request the assistance of law enforcement authorities, and file judicial complaints.
In addition, the Securities Law confers on the CNV the power to appoint supervisors with veto powers over the resolutions adopted by the board of directors of companies under CNV’s supervision (i.e. companies that offer
160
securities publicly) when, as determined by the CNV, the interest of minority shareholders or securities holders are affected; the decisions of the supervisors may only be challenged before the chairman of the board of directors of the CNV. The CNV has also powers to withdraw the board of directors of a company for a period of 180-days, when the above same circumstances occur until the ending of the irregularities; this decision may only be challenged before the Ministry of Economy.
A mandatory tender offer for taking of control of a company is now applicable to all companies admitted to the public offering regime, with no possibility to opt out of the regime.
ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Not applicable
The following summarizes certain material provisions of our by-laws and Argentine law, the main regulatory bodies governing BBVA Francés. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Business Companies Law, the Financial Institution Law and our by-laws. A copy of our by-laws was filed as an exhibit to our 2014 annual report on Form 20-F.
At our Ordinary and Extraordinary Stockholders’ Meeting held on April 28, 2005, our stockholders voted to amend section 11 of the by-laws in order to comply with Resolution No. 20/04 of the Office of Corporations – Public Registry of Commerce (Inspección General de Justicia), and its amendments. This amendment will require each of our Directors to (i) pledge an amount of at least Ps.10,000 as a guarantee of the Director’s performance and (ii) maintain a special domicile within the Argentine Republic. This amendment has been filed with the Public Registry of Commerce, which was approved as of the filing of this annual report, on December 12, 2005, under Number 16,335, Book 30.
At the Ordinary and Extraordinary Stockholders’ Meeting held on March 27, 2009, our shareholders agreed and authorized to amend sections 10 and 13 of the corporate by-laws that will make it possible for the company to replace its Board of directors either partially or in stages through the appointment or re-election of its members, as well as to hold its meetings with the attendance of non-resident directors by video-teleconference. This amendment was registered with the Public Registry of Commerce on April 21, 2010, under Number 7.192, Book 49.
At the Ordinary and Extraordinary Stockholders´ Meeting held on April 30, 2010, our shareholders agreed and authorized to: (i) the amendment of section 10 of the corporate by-law regarding the different denominations that could be used by the company’s CEO, and (ii) to the amendment of section 21 and to eliminate section 17, regarding the Executive Committee which was no longer in use. These amendments were registered with the Public Registry of Commerce on August 2, 2010, under Number 13.784, Book 50.
At the Ordinary and Extraordinary Stockholders´ Meeting held on March 26, 2012, our shareholders agreed and authorized to amend section 10 of the corporate by-laws and included a transitional provision to allow the appointment of Directors for a less-than-three-year period, so that the appointment or renewal of their mandates is always carried out at least by three candidates, therefore ensuring the rights of minority shareholders to exercise their cumulative votes. The amendments were registered with the Public Registry of Commerce on October 19, 2012, under Number 15.848, Book 61.
At the Ordinary and Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting held on April 10, 2014, our shareholders approved an amendment to section 1 and 3 of the corporate by-laws in order to comply with the Capital Market Law. This amendment was registered before the Office of Corporations – Public Registry of Commerce (IGJ) on September 18th, 2014 under No. 17995, book 70. A copy of our by-laws was filed as an exhibit to our 2014 annual report on Form 20-F.
Nothing has changed since the Shareholders’ Meeting held on April 10, 2014.
Registry and Company’s Objects and Purposes
BBVA Francés is registered with the Public Registry of Commerce of the Argentina (Registro Público de Comercio) under company number 1,065, Page 359, Book 5, Volume “A” of Local Corporate By-laws. Section 3 of our by-laws provides that the
161
object of BBVA Francés is to engage in the commercial banking business, including financial brokerage, whether in Argentina or abroad. Under our by-laws, BBVA Francés is authorized to perform the following activities:
Under Section 18 of our by-laws, the Board of Directors receives an annual fee established by the shareholders. This fee is subject to the restrictions of Section 261 of the Business Companies Law, which provides that the aggregate compensation of the directors may not exceed 25% of the income of the company, or 5% of the income if no dividends were distributed to the shareholders.
162
The compensation of the members of the Board is previously approved by the Nominations and Compensation Committee and the Audit Committee (II) of the Bank, taking into consideration the reasonability and legality of the amount proposed. The decision of these two Committees regarding the compensation amount will then be submitted to the approval of the Board of directors and the Annual Shareholders Meeting.
Under Section 272 of the Business Companies Law, a director may not vote in respect of any proposal in which he, or any person connected to him, has an interest contrary to the interests of BBVA Francés. Moreover, Directors are not entitled to carry out personal transactions with the company or its affiliates, other than the banking common operations, unless they are approved by a special procedure that guarantees the transparency of proposed transaction.
Directors need not hold shares in BBVA Francés or any of our subsidiaries to qualify and be appointed as directors of BBVA Francés.
The bank has no policies regarding age limits or retirement age.
Rights Attaching to Shares
As of the date of the filing of this annual report, our capital is formed by a single class of shares, all of which are ordinary shares and have the same voting and economic rights. Shareholders participate in the distribution of dividends pro rata of the paid-in capital. Furthermore, shareholders are entitled to participate in the distribution resulting from the liquidation of BBVA Francés in proportion to the paid-in capital.
Shareholders are entitled to vote cumulatively one-third of the vacancies of the Board of directors. The board may not be partially reelected if it impairs or prevents the exercise by shareholders of their cumulative voting rights.
Shareholders may no longer claim the payment of dividends from BBVA Francés once three years have elapsed from the date on which the relevant dividend was made available to such shareholder.
Our by-laws do not contain any provisions related to sinking funds or potential liability of shareholders of BBVA Francés to make additional contributions.
Communication “A” 5072, from May 6, 2010, provides that financial entities can distribute retained profits, with the corresponding authorization from the Central Bank, which must verify the following regarding such financial entity:
Communications “A” 5272 and “A” 5827 of the Central Bank dated February 1, 2012, increased the capital requirements for financial institutions that carry out activities in Argentina. These Communications require certain capital levels in order to support operational risks, and require for the distribution of dividends an additional conservation buffer equivalent to 75% of the total capital requirements.
Shareholders Meetings
All general meetings apart from annual regular meetings are called regular or special meetings. Ordinary and Extraordinary shareholders’ meetings are to be convened by the Board of Directors of the Bank or by the Supervisory Committee in such instances as set forth by law, or whenever they may deem it necessary, or upon requisition of shareholders representing at least 5% of our stock capital, as provided by Section 236 of the Business Companies Law.
163
Shareholders’ meetings are called by publication for five days, at least 20 and not more than 45 days before the date of the meeting, in the Official Gazette and in one of the most widely circulated newspapers in Argentina. The notice must include the nature, the date, time and place of the meeting, the agenda, and any special requirements in our by-laws for the shareholders to attend.
In case of adjournment of a regular shareholders meeting, the meeting on second call may be held on the same date, at least one hour after the time set for the meeting on first call, in compliance with Section 237 of the Business Companies Law. In case of adjournment of a special shareholders’ meeting, the meeting on second call must be held within the following thirty days, and the publication must appear for three days at least eight days before the date set for that meeting.
In order to attend and vote at any shareholders’ meeting, shareholders must deposit with us their shares or a share certificate or a statement of account representing book-entry shares, as the case may be, issued by us, a securities depository or any other authorized institution, to be recorded in the record book of attendance, at least three business days before the date of the meeting.
Holders of registered or book-entry shares, the record of which we keep, are only required to notify us to register their names in the record book of attendance, at least three business days before the date of the meeting. We must provide such shareholders with certificates authorizing them to attend the meeting.
Shareholders may be present at meetings by power-of-attorney or proxy. In the latter case, the principal’s signature shall be certified by a court, notary public or bank. Directors, statutory auditors, managers or any other of our employees may not act as agents for these purposes.
A quorum must be present at any regular shareholders’ meetings on first call upon the attendance of shareholders representing the majority of voting stock. On second call, there is a quorum with the attendance of any number of shares present. A quorum is present at any special shareholders’ meeting on first call upon the attendance of shareholders representing 60% of the voting stock. Shareholders representing 30% of our voting stock shall constitute a quorum at a special shareholders’ meeting on second call. In any case, resolutions require the absolute majority of the voting stock present.
Restrictions on Voting and Shareholding
There are no restrictions imposed by Argentine law or our by-laws or other organizational documents regarding the rights of non-residents or foreign persons to hold or vote our ordinary shares or ADSs of the Bank.
Change of Control
There are no provisions in our articles of incorporation or by-laws that would have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control of BBVA Francés and that would operate only with respect to a merger, acquisition, corporate restructuring involving BBVA Francés or any of its subsidiaries.
Ownership Disclosure
There are no provisions in our by-laws governing the ownership threshold above which shareholder ownership must be disclosed.
Change in the Capital
Our by-laws do not establish conditions for the changes in the capital of BBVA Francés more stringent than those conditions imposed by the Business Companies Law.
No material contracts outside the ordinary course of business have been entered into during the last two years.
On January 7, 2002, Congress approved the Public Emergency Law that introduced dramatic changes to the country’s economic model and amended the currency board that pegged the peso at parity with the dollar which had been in effect since April 1, 1991 pursuant to the Convertibility Law. The law empowers the Executive Branch to implement, among other things, additional monetary, financial and exchange measures to overcome the economic crisis in the medium term. The Central Bank, among other restrictive measures, restricted the transfer of U.S. dollars abroad without its prior approval. In 2003 and 2004, the government substantially
164
eased these restrictions. On June 10, 2005 the government issued Decree No. 616/05 establishing further restrictions on capital flows into Argentina, with the following provisions:
On December 16, 2015, the Ministry of Economy and Public Finances issued Resolution No. 3/2015 (published in the Official Gazette on December 18, 2015) amending Decree No. 616/2005. Pursuant to such resolution, the mandatory waiting period is reduced from 365 to 120 calendar days and the mandatory deposit is reduced to zero percent.
Accompanying this resolution, the Central Bank issued new foreign exchange regulations on December 27, 2015 Communications “A” 5850, 5852 and continuing with Communications “A” 5861, 5890, 5899 and supplementary, under which structural changes were made to the current foreign exchange regime, easing the access to the foreign exchange market.
Cross Border Transfers of Funds, Foreign Debts
Repayment of principal of, and interest on, foreign indebtedness, was initially subject to the Central Bank’s prior authorization. Currently, due to the changes introduced by the Central Bank, there are two regimes depending on the date of disbursement or renewal of the financial indebtedness granted to local companies (with the exception of financial institutions)
If the financial indebtedness was granted or renewed before December 17, 2015 the existing 365-calendar day period will apply. For indebtedness incurred after December 17, 2015 (“New Indebtedness”) the minimum waiting period was reduced from 365 to 120 calendar days (counted as from the date on which the funds are transferred to Argentina).
In addition, Argentine residents are allowed to access the foreign exchange market to prepay, totally or partially, principal corresponding to foreign financial indebtedness the proceeds of which was settled in the foreign exchange market as from December 17, 2015, and subject to compliance with the minimum waiting period.
New Indebtedness is no longer subject to the mandatory inflow and settlement through the foreign exchange market. However, evidence of such settlement and registration will be required in order to be granted access to the foreign exchange market for the payment of principal and interest services.
Regulations Regarding Exports, Imports, and Services.
Regarding exports, the Central Bank relaxed in 2016 certain rules related to the inflow and outflow of foreign currency collected abroad as a result of the collection of exports of goods, advance payments, and pre– export financings, establishing that the obligation to transfer from abroad to Argentina that foreign currency obtained, will remain in force but only taking into account the calendar days depending and fixed on the product being exported.
The 10-business day period applicable for the transfer of funds collected abroad as a result of the collection of exports of goods, advance payments, and pre-export financings to a correspondent bank account of a local financial institution (cuenta de corresponsalía) has been eliminated since December 2015.
Regarding imports, access to the foreign exchange market for the payment of imports with customs clearance date as of December 17, 2015 can be paid through the local foreign exchange market without any limit. Imports of goods debts pending of payment as of December 17, 2015, however, may be repaid through the local foreign exchange market in accordance to applicable rules, in the following cases:
165
The remaining debts from imports of goods may be repaid through the local foreign exchange market provided that applicable rules are complied with, and subject to the following schedule:
The AFIP Regulation 3252 published on January 5, 2012 which set forth that importers must file an import prior sworn statement has been eliminated and in replacement it was created the Import Monitoring System (Sistema Integral de Monitoreo de Importaciones or “SIMI”, which establishes an obligation for importers to submit certain information electronically through the SIMI application.
Finally, the regulation states that the term to prove the customs registry of goods or to proceed on the settlement of the foreign currency funds associated with the return of the payment is unified in 365 calendar days from the date of access to the foreign exchange market. In the event of delays in customs registration, due to reasons beyond the importer’s control, the financial institutions involved may grant an extension of the deadlines set out above, that in any case should exceed 540 calendar days from the date of access to the foreign exchange market. If, at the expiration of the aforementioned deadlines, these causes of delay persist, the importer may request the Central Bank for an extension.
Regarding the payment of services, the access to the foreign exchange market for payments of services rendered as from December 17, 2015 may be carried out without any limits and without the Central Bank’s prior authorization.
Debts for rendered and /or accrued services until December 16, 2015 may be repaid through the local foreign exchange process provided that applicable rules are complied with ( Communication “A” 5295 (and amendments) and subject to the following schedule:
Purchase of Foreign Currency
Communication “A” 5850 and Resolution No. 3,821 modified and replaced the prior regimes related to, among others, the purchase of external assets by Argentine residents – local individuals and companies - for investment purposes (a practice commonly referred to as atesoramiento) and travel and tourism and family assistance.
Therefore, the request and registration for the purchase of foreign currency under the “Exchange Transactions Consulting Program” of the Argentine Administration of Public Revenues (AFIP) has been rendered without effect since December 17, 2015 and the AFIP’s prior approval is no longer required for the purchase of foreign currency.
The regime currently applicable is characterized by the following:
166
Argentine residents that receive funds in foreign currency for the payment of services rendered to non-Argentine residents or for the sale of non-produced non- financial assets may receive those funds in a local foreign currency account without exchanging it for Argentine Pesos in the foreign exchange market, provided that the following requirements are met:
The applicable regime to non-residents depends on whether it relates to portfolio investments or direct investments as described below.
167
Transfer of Dividends
According to Communications “A” 3859 and “A” 5264 (as amended), Argentine companies in general, may transfer corporate profits and dividends corresponding to audited financial statements certified by external public accountants. Under the AFIP Regulation 3417, published on December 20, 2012, a sworn prior statement to pay dividends shall be required. For information regarding the payment of dividends for Financial Entities please “Item 8 – Financial Information”.
Direct Investments
On March 4, 2005, the Argentine Central Bank issued Communication “A” 4305 that regulates the reporting system of direct investments and real estate investments carried out by non-residents in Argentina and by Argentine residents abroad, which had been implemented through Communication “A” 4237 dated November 10, 2004.
Non-Argentine residents are compelled to comply with the reporting regime if the value of their investments in Argentina reaches or surpasses the equivalent of US$500,000 – measured in terms of the net worth of the company in which they participate or fiscal value of the real estate owned. If the investments do not reach such amount, the compliance with such regime is optional.
According to Communication “A” 4237, companies in which non-Argentine residents participate in and administrators of real estate pertaining to non-Argentine residents are those obliged to comply with the reporting regime.
Argentine investors are compelled to comply with the reporting regime if the value of their investments abroad reaches or surpasses the equivalent of US$1,000,000 – measured in terms of net worth of the company in which they participate or the fiscal value of the real estate they own.
If the value of those investments abroad does not exceed the equivalent of US$5,000,000, the declaration could be carried out annually instead of semi-annually. If the investments do not reach the equivalent of US$1,000,000, the compliance with such regime is optional.
Future and Forward Operations
Communication “A” 4049 dated November 11, 2003, as amended, and Communication “A” 4805 (and additional ones) dated May 15, 2008, eased restrictions on foreign currency transactions by revoking the requirement of prior approval by the Central Bank so as to effect certain Future and Forward operations and have access to the exchange market for their cancellation. These transactions include agreements on foreign currency hedging interest rates and product prices, as well as foreign exchange REPO transactions.
Additional relevant exchange changes
168
The following is a summary of certain Argentine and United States federal income tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of our ADSs or ordinary shares by a U.S. Holder (as defined below). This summary is not a complete analysis or listing of all possible tax considerations that may be relevant to a holder of our ADSs or ordinary shares. Holders of our ADSs or ordinary shares should consult their own tax advisers as to the United States, Argentine and other tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of ADSs or ordinary shares.
The following is a summary of certain Argentine tax matters that may be relevant with respect to the ownership and disposition of ADSs or ordinary shares by U.S. Holders. Such summary is based upon the tax laws of Argentina, and regulations thereunder, in effect as of the date of this annual report and is subject to any subsequent change in Argentine laws and regulations which may come into effect after such date. Investors in ADSs or ordinary shares should consult their own tax advisers as to the United States, Argentine and other tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of ADSs or ordinary shares.
Taxation of Dividends
Pursuant to Law No. 25,063, as enacted into law on December 30, 1998, dividend payments on the ordinary shares (and ADSs), whether in the form of cash, stock, or other types of consideration, are subject to Argentine withholding taxes at a rate of 35% to the extent the aggregate amount distributed exceeds the sum, for the previous year, of: (i) our accumulated taxable earnings and (ii) certain tax-exempt income (such as dividend payments from other corporations) (known as the “equalization tax”).
Cash and stock dividends distributed in 2014 were not subject to income tax withholding.
On September 23, 2013, Law No. 26,893 was published, which imposes a 10% withholding tax on dividends, in cash or in kind, that Argentine companies distribute to Argentine individuals as well as foreign individuals and entities. The law describes the 10% withholding tax as a “sole and definitive” payment.
For purposes of Law No. 26,893, distributions are considered made when paid, made available to the shareholder, credited to the account of the shareholder, or, with the authorization or express or implied agreement of the shareholder, reinvested, accumulated, capitalized, placed in reserve or in a sinking fund or insurance, or disposed of in another form.
The 10% withholding tax will apply in addition to any equalization tax payable. Specifically, the 10% rate is imposed on the excess of the amount of the distribution over the amount of any equalization tax withheld, and will be withheld in conjunction with any such equalization tax.
Law No. 26,893 became effective as of September 23, 2013 and applies to taxable events on or after that date.
Taxation of Capital Gains
Prior to the enactment of Law No. 26,893, capital gains derived by non-Argentine residents from the sale, exchange or other disposition of ADSs or ordinary shares of Argentine issuers listed on a local or foreign stock exchange were not subject to Argentine income tax. Law No. 26,893 now imposes a 15% tax on capital gains derived by both Argentine residents and non-resident individuals and entities from the sale, exchange or other disposition of shares, quotas, bonds or “other securities” of Argentine issuers. The relevant regulations define “other securities” as those securities issued or grouped in a series that can be traded on stock exchanges.
For foreign holders, the gain upon which this new tax applies is presumed to be 90% of the gross sales price, which amounts to an effective tax rate of 13.5% of the gross sale price. The law provides for an alternative option to have the tax imposed on the foreign holder’s actual gain realized (as determined under Argentine regulations); however, procedures for exercising this alternative option have not yet been determined.
169
If both the purchaser and seller of the shares are foreign parties, the law provides that the tax shall be paid by the purchaser. There are currently no regulations providing for procedures with respect to the payment of the capital gains tax under these circumstances.
The new law provides an exemption from the 15% tax for gain realized by Argentine individuals and undivided estates from the sale of publicly traded shares, quotas, bonds and other securities. Applicable regulations (Decree No. 2,334/13) limit the application of this exemption to securities that are traded on exchanges or markets authorized by the CNV.
As noted above, several aspects of Law No. 26,839 are unclear and there is currently no administrative or judicial interpretation of the law. Investors in ADSs or ordinary shares should consult their own tax advisers regarding the application of this new law.
Value Added Tax (“VAT”)
Neither the sale, exchange or other disposition of ADSs or ordinary shares nor the payment of dividends thereunder is subject to VAT.
Transfer Taxes
The sale or transfer of ADSs or ordinary shares is not subject to transfer tax.
Personal Property Tax
According to Law No. 23,966, as amended, and Decrees No. 127/96 and 812/96, all individuals and undivided estates are subject in Argentina to a personal property tax on all assets held at December 31 of each fiscal year (the “Personal Property Tax”). This tax applies to our ADSs and ordinary shares held by U.S. Holders. In the case of individuals and undivided estates domiciled or located in Argentina, an exemption is available to taxpayers whose assets included in the tax base for purposes of the Personal Property Tax do not exceed Ps.305,000. Corporations and other legal entities domiciled or located in Argentina are not subject to the Personal Property Tax. Individuals and undivided estates domiciled or located in a foreign country are subject to the Personal Property Tax only with respect to assets located in Argentina.
Pursuant to Law No. 25,585, it is presumed — without the right to rebut such presumption — that shares of stock corporations, such as ADSs (held in book-entry form or evidenced by ADRs), shares of common stock and equity interests in entities governed by the Business Companies Law No. 19,550, as amended, whose holders are corporations or any other entities, companies, permanent establishments or trusts, domiciled, settled or located in a foreign country, belong indirectly to individuals or undivided estates domiciled in a foreign country.
Pursuant to Law No. 25,585, published in the Official Gazette on May 15, 2002, BBVA Francés is responsible for paying the Personal Property Tax on our ADSs or ordinary shares held by individuals or undivided estates domiciled in Argentina or a foreign country, or corporations or any other entities located in a foreign country. The tax rate to be applied is 0.50% and the taxable base is the value of the shareholders’ equity arising from the last balance sheet of the company at December 31. The minimum exempted amount of Ps.305,000 is not applicable. The tax so paid is considered a definitive payment.
Companies responsible for the tax payment, such as BBVA Francés, are entitled to obtain refunds of the amounts paid from holders of ADSs or ordinary shares and may retain or foreclose on the property included in the tax base for purposes of the Personal Property Tax that originated the payment.
In May 2015, BBVA Francés paid Ps46,403,894.48to the Argentine authorities on account of its shareholders in connection with Personal Property Tax due with respect to assets held as of December 31, 2014.
In 2016, the Bank expects to make payments on account of its shareholders in connection of personal property tax due with respect to assets held as of December 31, 2015. The tax may be withheld from future dividends.
Other Taxes
There are no Argentine inheritance, succession or gift taxes applicable to the ownership, transfer or disposition of ADSs or ordinary shares. There are no Argentine stamp, issue, registration or similar taxes or duties payable by holders of ADSs or ordinary shares.
Deposit and Withdrawal of Ordinary Shares in Exchange for ADSs
No Argentine tax is imposed on the deposit or withdrawal of ordinary shares in exchange for ADSs.
170
Income Tax Treaty
There is currently no income tax treaty or convention in effect between Argentina and the United States.
The following summary describes the material U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. Holders of owning and disposing of ADSs or ordinary shares, but it does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to a particular person’s decision to hold such securities. The discussion applies only to U.S. Holders (as described below) that hold ADSs or ordinary shares as capital assets for U.S. federal income tax purposes and it does not describe all of the tax consequences that may be relevant in light of the U.S. Holder’s particular circumstances, including alternative minimum tax consequences, the potential application of the provisions of the Code known as the Medicare contribution tax and tax consequences applicable to U.S. Holders subject to special rules, such as:
If an entity that is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds ADSs or ordinary shares, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner will generally depend on the status of the partner and upon the activities of the partnership. Partnerships holding ADSs or ordinary shares and partners in such partnerships should consult their tax advisers as to the particular U.S. federal income tax consequences of holding and disposing of the ADSs or ordinary shares.
This discussion is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), administrative pronouncements, judicial decisions and final, temporary and proposed Treasury regulations, all as of the date hereof. These laws are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis, which may affect the tax consequences described herein. It is also based in part on representations by the depositary and assumes that each obligation under the deposit agreement and any related agreement will be performed in accordance with its terms. Holders of the ADSs or ordinary shares are urged to consult their own tax advisers as to the United States, Argentine and other tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of ADSs or ordinary shares in their particular circumstances, including the effect of any U.S. state or local tax laws.
As used herein, a “U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of ADSs or ordinary shares that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
In general, a U.S. Holder who owns ADSs will be treated as the owner of the underlying shares represented by those ADSs for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, no gain or loss will be recognized if a U.S. Holder exchanges ADSs for the underlying shares represented by those ADSs.
171
The U.S. Treasury has expressed concern that parties to whom American depositary shares are released before shares are delivered to the depositary (“pre-release”), or intermediaries in the chain of ownership between U.S. Holders and the issuer of the security underlying the American depositary shares, may be taking actions that are inconsistent with the claiming of foreign tax credits for U.S. Holders of American depositary shares. Such actions would also be inconsistent with the claiming of the reduced rate of tax, described below, applicable to dividends received by certain non-corporate holders. Accordingly, the creditability of Argentine taxes, and the availability of the reduced tax rate for dividends received by certain non-corporate holders, each described below, could be affected by actions taken by such parties or intermediaries.
U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers concerning the U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. tax consequences of owning and disposing of ADSs or ordinary shares in their own particular circumstances.
This discussion assumes that the Company is not, and will not become, a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”), as described below.
Taxation of Distributions
Distributions paid on ADSs or ordinary shares, other than certain pro rata distributions of ordinary shares, will generally be treated as dividends to the extent paid out of current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles). Because the Company does not maintain calculations of its earnings and profits under U.S. federal income tax principles, it is expected that distributions will be reported to U.S. Holders as dividends. Subject to applicable limitations and the discussion above regarding concerns expressed by the U.S. Treasury, dividends paid by qualified foreign corporations to certain non-corporate U.S. Holders are taxable at rates applicable to long-term capital gains. A foreign corporation is treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to dividends paid on stock that is readily tradable on a securities market in the United States, such as the New York Stock Exchange where our ADSs are traded. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers to determine whether the favorable rate will apply to dividends they receive and whether they are subject to any special rules that limit their ability to be taxed at this favorable rate. The amount of a dividend will include any amounts withheld in respect of Argentine taxes. The amount of the dividend generally will be treated as foreign-source dividend income to U.S. Holders and will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction generally allowed to U.S. corporations under the Code. Dividends generally will be included in a U.S. Holder’s income on the date of such U.S. Holder’s (or in the case of ADSs, the depositary’s) receipt of the dividend. The amount of any dividend income paid in Argentine Pesos will be the U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the date of such receipt regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars. If the dividend is converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, U.S. Holders should not be required to recognize foreign currency gain or loss in respect of the dividend income. U.S. Holders may have foreign currency gain or loss if they do not convert the amount of such dividend into U.S. dollars on the date of its receipt.
Subject to applicable limitations, some of which vary depending upon the U.S. Holder’s circumstances and subject to the discussion above regarding concerns expressed by the U.S. Treasury, Argentine income taxes, if any, withheld from payments of dividends on ADSs or ordinary shares generally will be creditable against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability. Amounts paid on account of the Argentine Personal Property Tax, if any, will not be eligible for credit against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers to determine the tax consequences applicable to them as result of amounts paid on account of the Argentine Personal Property Tax, including whether such amounts are includible in income or deductible for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The rules governing foreign tax credits are complex and, therefore, U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers regarding the availability of foreign tax credits in their particular circumstances. Instead of claiming a foreign tax credit, a U.S. Holder may, at its election, deduct such otherwise creditable Argentine taxes in computing its taxable income, subject to generally applicable limitations under U.S. law.
Sale or Other Disposition of ADSs or Ordinary Shares
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, gain or loss a U.S. Holder realizes on the sale or other disposition of ADSs or ordinary shares will be capital gain or loss, and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder held the ADSs or ordinary shares for more than one year. The amount of a U.S. Holder’s gain or loss will equal the difference between its tax basis in the ADSs or ordinary shares disposed of and the amount realized on the disposition, in each case as determined in U.S. dollars. If an Argentine tax is withheld on the sale or disposition of ADSs or ordinary shares, a U.S. Holder’s amount realized will include the gross amount of the proceeds of the sale or disposition before deduction of the Argentine tax. See “Argentine Taxes—Taxation of Capital Gains” for a description of when a disposition may be subject to taxation by Argentina. Such gain or loss will generally be U.S.-source gain or loss for foreign tax credit purposes. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers as to whether the Argentine tax on gains may be creditable against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax on foreign source income from other sources.
Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules
We believe that we were not a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes for the taxable year 2015. However, because our PFIC status depends upon the composition of our income and assets and the market value of our assets (including, among others, less than
172
25-percent-owned equity investments) from time to time, and because our analysis of our PFIC status is based upon certain proposed Treasury regulations that are not yet in effect but are generally proposed to become effective for taxable years after December 31, 1994 and may not be finalized in their current form, there can be no assurance that we will not be considered a PFIC for any taxable year. If we are treated as a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder held ADSs or ordinary shares, gain recognized by such U.S. Holder on a sale or other disposition (including certain pledges) of ADSs or ordinary shares would be allocated ratably over the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the ADSs or ordinary shares. The amounts allocated to the taxable year of the sale or other disposition and to any year before we became a PFIC would be taxed as ordinary income. The amount allocated to each other taxable year would be subject to tax at the highest rate in effect for individuals or corporations, as appropriate, for such taxable year and an interest charge would be imposed on the resulting tax liability for each such taxable year. Further, any distribution in respect of ADSs or ordinary shares in excess of 125 percent of the average of the annual distributions on ADSs or ordinary shares received by the U.S. Holder during the preceding three years or the U.S. Holder’s holding period, whichever is shorter, would be subject to taxation in the same manner. Certain elections (including a mark-to-market election) may be available to U.S. Holders that may mitigate the adverse consequences resulting from PFIC status. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers to determine whether any of these elections would be available and, if so, what the consequences of the alternative treatments would be in their particular circumstances.
In addition, if we were a PFIC or, with respect to a particular U.S. Holder, were treated as a PFIC for a taxable year in which we pay a dividend or the prior taxable year, the favorable tax rates discussed above with respect to dividends paid to certain non-corporate holders would not apply.
If we are a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder owned our ADSs or ordinary shares, such U.S. Holder will generally be required to file IRS Form 8621 with the U.S. Holder’s annual U.S. federal income tax return, subject to certain exceptions.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding
Payments of dividends and sales proceeds that are made within the United States or through certain U.S.-related financial intermediaries generally are subject to information reporting, and may be subject to backup withholding, unless (i) the U.S. Holder is an exempt recipient or (ii) in the case of backup withholding, the U.S. Holder provides a correct taxpayer identification number and certifies that it is not subject to backup withholding.
The amount of any backup withholding from a payment to a U.S. Holder will be allowed as a credit against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle the U.S. Holder to a refund, provided that the required information is timely furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.
This annual report and the exhibits thereto and any periodic reports or other information filed pursuant to the Exchange Act may be inspected without charge and copied at prescribed rates at the SEC’s public reference room located at 100F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 25049. In addition, the SEC maintains a website that contains information filed electronically with the SEC, which can be accessed over the internet at www.sec.gov. The documents concerning BBVA Francés which are referred to in this annual report may also be inspected at our office at Reconquista 199, C1003ABB Buenos Aires, Republic of Argentina.
ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Trading Portfolio Activities
Market Risk
173
Market risk is defined as the possibility of suffering losses in the value of a portfolio as a result of adverse changes in market prices. The main market risks can be classified as follows:
Our market risk unit applies the criteria, policies and procedures defined by the Board, following up and monitoring its correct application, as well as proposing the necessary actions to maintain the quality of the risk within the defined objectives.
We consider that the metrics used to control and monitor market risk at BBVA Francés are aligned with the best practices in the market.
In order to manage the market risk, BBVA Francés uses a parametric Value at Risk (“VaR”) model. This is the basic measure to control risks as it estimates the maximum loss, within a given confidence interval, in the fair or market value of a certain instrument or portfolio during a determined horizon.
At BBVA Francés, the VaR is calculated within a confidence interval of 99% and one day horizon. Volatilities are calculated using a historical period of two years (504 observations). This statistic is widely used in the market and has the advantage of summing up in a single metric the risks inherent to trading activity, taking into account how they are related and providing a prediction of the loss that the trading book could sustain as a result of prices fluctuations.
Market risks management focuses on the Bank’s Global Market (“GM”) trading portfolio. This portfolio includes:
The monitoring and control of the market risks is conducted under a scheme of limits in terms of Economic Capital (CeR), VaR, Stress, and monthly and annual Stop Loss. This scheme is presented and proposed by the market risk unit and approved every year by the Risk Management Committee and the Board.
Within the model of market risk management there are specific circuits established for communication and operation in case approved risks levels are exceeded.
During 2015 the market risk was moderated. Towards the end of the year, currency devaluation generated an increase of volatility that caused VaR to reach the maximum level of year.
The VaR fluctuated from a lower of Ps 3.77 million as of December 31, 2015 to a higher of Ps.61,85 million as of December 17, 2015. The average VaR for the year was Ps.11,99 million. The interest risk measured by VaR averaged Ps.8,37 million and we observe an exchange risk VaR average of Ps.6,58 million during 2015.
The graphs below show the evolution of market risk measured by total VaR and categorized by the type of risk (interest risk and exchange-rate risk) during 2015:
174
The following tables show the evolution of VaR during the last three years.
175
Daily Trading VaR at BBVA Francés (in millions of pesos)
Daily Trading VaR – Categories (in millions of pesos)
Interest Risk VaR
Exchange-rate Risk
Validation of the model
The market risk model is periodically validated through back testing analysis. The aim of these tests is to determine the quality and precision of the model used to calculate the daily maximum loss of a portfolio, with a 99% of confidence interval and temporal horizon of 250 days, by comparing the trading portfolio results and the risk measurements calculated by the model. These tests have periodically proved that the market risk model is adequate and precise.
Stress test analysis
The scenario used for the exercises of economic stress is based on resampling methodology. This methodology is based on the use of dynamic scenarios that are recalculated periodically depending on the main risks in the trading portfolios. On a data window wide enough to collect different periods of stress (data are taken from January 1, 2008 until today), a simulation is performed by a resampling of historical observations. This generates a distribution of losses and gains that provides an analysis of the most extreme events that occurred within the selected historical window. The advantage of this methodology is that the stress period is not pre-established, but rather a function of the portfolio held at any time. As it makes a high number of simulations (10,000) it can analyze the expected shortfall with further information than that available in the scenarios included in the VaR calculation.
Valuation
The Market Risk unit performs prudent valuation at market prices of fixed income instruments and derivatives. Automatic systems are used for daily capture and dissemination of prices and market variables that have an impact on the Bank´s portfolio and client’s holdings in custody.
For price determination, the use of market information is prioritized. If not possible, pricing though internal models are performed. For instance, fixed income securities in the trading portfolio are priced with the discounted cash flow model using market yield curves.
Derivatives Credit Risk
The Market Risk unit is responsible for monitoring and control derivatives credit risks. This risk depends on:
The discussion that follows relates to interest risk in 2015 and bears no relation to our current or future interest rate risk.
176
Interest rate sensitivity is the relationship between market interest rates and net portfolio value, on one hand, and net interest income on the other, due to the repricing of assets and liabilities. Our interest rate sensitivity analysis measures the sensitivity of the net portfolio value and net interest income to parallel changes in interest rates and to changes in the yield curve.
For the purpose of calculating net present value, when the rate of interest is fixed, future cash flows of financial assets and liabilities are calculated on a contractual basis. When the interest rate is variable, cash flows are included that have a maturity during the repricing interval. Such amounts are added to the remaining balance of the asset or the liability at the end of the interval.
Net interest income is calculated as the difference between interest income earned on interest-earning assets and interest expense from interest-bearing liabilities for each month of the fiscal year immediately following the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.
In general, the usefulness of this calculation is limited to its assumption of a permanent increase or decrease in interest rates and that all of such rates change at the same rate. Accordingly, actual results could differ materially from those projected.
For any given period, the pricing structure is matched when an equal amount of assets and liabilities reprice. Any mismatch of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities is known as a gap. A positive gap denotes asset sensitivity and normally means that an increase in interest rates would have a negative effect on net portfolio value and a positive effect on interest income, while a decline in interest rates would have a positive effect on net portfolio value and a negative effect on net interest income.
Changes in interest rates affect our profitability as a result of timing differences on the repricing of the assets and liabilities. One measure of the effect of a change in interest rates is to measure the change in net portfolio value (defined as the net present value of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities) and the effect on net interest income from a given change in interest rates. In the table below, interest rates are assumed to change immediately, while the consistency and levels of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, including the effects of derivative financial instruments, remain constant. The table measures the net portfolio value and net interest income under various interest rate scenarios and the percentage changes from amounts generated under a stable interest rate environment.
The following chart includes adjusted assets and liabilities in the 0-3 months interval. In order to measure the effect of a change in interest rates in net portfolio value and net interest income, we are assuming the same change in interest rate as in the adjustment rate. However, as this may not be the case, we are including another column showing the impact of a variation in the adjustment rate with no variation in interest rate.
Based on our position at December 31, 2015, and assuming a hypothetical, immediate 500 basis points increase in interests rates affecting all interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities as of January 1, 2016, net portfolio value would be reduced by Ps.1015.8 million and net interest income over 2016 would be increased by approximately Ps.562.8 million.
Foreign Exchange Risk
As of December 31, 2015, as part of our asset and liability management, we aimed to minimize the impact on results of foreign exchange rate fluctuations by maintaining excess balances of assets over liabilities denominated in dollars. The following table shows the effect on net income of a 10% variation in the value of the Peso against all other currencies:
Effect on net income based on our position as of December 31, 2015
Effect on net income based on our position as of December 31, 2014
For a description of the changes in the exchange rates, see “Item 3. Key Information—Exchange Rates”.
177
Equity and Commodity Price Risk
Equity and commodity risk are the risks associated with adverse movements in the value of equity securities and commodities or related indexes. We do not have any material exposure to either of them.
Non-trading Portfolio Activities
ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
Fees and charges for holders of American Depositary Receipts
The depositary for our American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”) is the Bank of New York Mellon (“BoNY”).
Holders of our ADRs are generally expected to pay fees to BoNY according to the schedule below:
Persons depositing or withdrawing shares must pay:
For:
§ Issuance of ADRs, including issuances resulting from a distribution, sale or exercise of shares or rights or other property
§ Cancellation of ADRs for the purpose of withdrawal including if the deposit agreement terminates
§ Cable, telex and facsimile transmissions (when expressly provided in the deposit agreement)
178
BNY Mellon collects its fees for delivery and surrender of ADRs directly from investors depositing shares or surrendering ADRs for the purpose of withdrawal or from intermediaries acting for them. It also collects fees for making distributions to investors by deducting those fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of distributable property to pay the fees. BNY Mellon may collect its annual fee for depositary services by deductions from cash distributions or by directly billing investors or by charging the book-entry system accounts of participants acting for them. BNY Mellon may generally refuse to provide fee-attracting services until its fees for those services are paid.
Fees Paid by Depositary to the Company
There are no fees or other direct and indirect payments made by BNY Mellon to the foreign issuer of the deposited securities.
179
- PART II -
ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES
ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS
ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of December 31, 2015, the Bank, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). There are, as described below, inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any control system, including disclosure controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.
Based on such evaluation, the Bank’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Bank’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective for gathering, analyzing and disclosing the information the Bank is required to disclose in the reports it files under the Exchange Act, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The management of the Bank is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15 (f) under the Exchange Act. The Bank’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Under the supervision and with the participation of the Bank’s management, including our Chief Executive Officer, and the Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on this assessment, our management concluded that, as of December 31, 2015, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria.
Our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015 has been audited by Deloitte & Co. S.A., an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which follows below.
180
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the President and Board of Directors of
Buenos Aires, Argentina
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of BBVA BANCO FRANCÉS S.A. and subsidiaries composing the BBVA BANCO FRANCÉS Group (the “Bank” – Note 2.1. to the Consolidated Financial Statements) as of December 31, 2015, based on the criteria established in the Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Bank’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanyingManagement’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Bank’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the Company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Bank maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on the criteria established in the Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 of the Bank, and our report dated April 26, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and included an explanatory paragraph regarding to the accounting rules established by the Argentine Central Bank (“BCRA”, for its Spanish acronym) as they vary in certain significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and that the information relating to the nature and effect of such differences is presented in Note 25 to the consolidated financial statements of the Bank.
/s/ DELOITTE & Co. S.A.
Buenos Aires – Argentina
April 26, 2016
181
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in the Bank’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
The Bank’s Board of directors has appointed Mr. Marcelo Canestri to serve on its Audit Committees (I and II) and Disclosure Committees. The Bank’s Board of directors has concluded that Mr. Canestri is an audit committee financial expert as defined by the SEC based on his extensive audit experience. Mr. Canestri qualifies as an independent director according to the independence criteria established by General Resolution No. 622 (New Text 2013).
ITEM 16B. CODE OF ETHICS
The standards of ethical conduct that BBVA Francés expects from its employees are found within the “Code of Conduct of BBVA Francés and its group of companies in Argentina”, or the Code of Conduct, approved by the Board of directors on December 18, 2003.
The Code of Conduct is applicable to all our management and employees, including the Executive Chairman, the Financial Director and other senior financial officers of the Bank. All officers and employees are accountable for adhering to the Code of Conduct. Suspected violations of the Code of Conduct may be reported in accordance with procedures designed to address the reported situation and to protect the reporting employee. The failure to comply with criteria and rules of the Code of Conduct may result in disciplinary action in accordance with applicable Argentine employment laws.
The Code of Conduct is accessible via BBVA Francés’ corporate website at: https://www.bbvafrances.com.ar/fbin/mult/Codigo-de-conducta_tcm1303-538711.pdf. The information found at this website is not incorporated by reference into this annual report.
A copy of our Code of Conduct is also available on request, free of charge, by writing or telephoning us at:
BBVA Banco Francés S.A.Attention: Investor Relations DepartmentReconquista 40C1003ABB Buenos AiresRepublic of Argentina
Telephone number: (54 11) 4341 5036
e-mail address: v.bories@bbva.com
cecilia.acuna@bbva.com
During fiscal year 2015, we amended the Code of Conduct to adapt it to the best practices and regulatory requirements.
No waivers from any provisions of the Code of Conduct were expressly or implicitly granted to the Executive Chairman, the Financial Director and any other senior financial officer of the Bank in the fiscal year 2015.
182
ITEM 16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Following is a summary of the fees to our independent external auditors for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014:
Audit fees are fees for professional services performed by Deloitte & Co. S.A. for the audit and limited review of the Bank’s annual and quarterly financial statements and services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings.
Audit-related feesconsist of fees for assurance and related services performed by Deloitte & Co. S.A. that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Bank’s financial statements and are not reported as Audit fees.
The Audit Committee (I) has approved policies and procedures for pre-approving all non-audit work that would be performed by Deloitte & Co. S.A. Specifically, the policies and procedures prohibit Deloitte & Co. S.A. from performing any services for the Bank or its subsidiaries without the prior approval of the Audit Committee (I). All of the services provided by Deloitte & Co. S.A. in 2015 were approved by the Audit Committee (I) pursuant to these approval policies. None of the hours expended on the principal accountant’s engagement to audit our financial statements for 2015 were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees. The Audit Committee (I) meets once a month. In each of these meetings, the Internal Audit Director presents the projects undertaken by the Internal Audit Department. The minutes of the meeting are then drawn up detailing the issues discussed as well as those items requiring further discussion. The minutes are transcribed into an internal control book which is sent to the Board for their information. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Senior Management—Audit Committee (I)”.
ITEM 16D. EXEMPTIONS FROM LISTING REQUIREMENTS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES
ITEM 16E. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY ONE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PERSONS
ITEM 16F. CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT
ITEM 16G. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
BBVA Francés’ corporate governance practices are governed by the applicable Argentine law (particularly, the General Companies Law, Law No. 26,831 and the standards of the CNV), as well as by its by-laws. BBVA Francés has securities that are registered with the SEC and are listed on the NYSE, and is therefore subject to corporate governance requirements applicable to NYSE-listed non-U.S. companies.
NYSE-listed non-U.S. companies may, in general, follow their home country corporate governance practices in lieu of most of the new NYSE corporate governance requirements codified in Section 303A of the NYSE’s Listed Company Manual. However, NYSE-listed non-U.S. companies must comply with NYSE Sections 303A.06, 303A.11 and 303A.12(b) and (c).
NYSE Section 303A.11 requires that non-U.S. companies disclose any significant ways in which their corporate governance practices differ from U.S. companies under NYSE listing standards. In accordance with NYSE Section 303A.11, we describe below the relevant differences between BBVA Francés’ corporate governance practices and NYSE standards for listed companies.
183
On the other hand, the CNV passed in May 2012 General Resolution No. 606/12 (“GR 606/12”) providing for the corporate governance requirements which companies that publicly offer shares representing their capital stock in Argentina must adopt. Moreover, since December 2012, the Bank has a new corporate governance code (“Código de Gobierno Societario”, hereinafter the “CGS”) in accordance with Communication “A” 5106 of the Central Bank and GR 606/12 from CNV.
Director Independence
Under NYSE Section 303A.01, a NYSE-listed company must have a majority of independent directors on its board of directors.
Under Argentine law, the board is not required to consist of a majority of independent directors. Notwithstanding, when directors are appointed, each shareholder that nominates a director is required to report at the meeting whether or not such director is independent. As of May 28, 2004, Argentine companies are required to have at least two independent directors to appoint the Audit Committee (I and II). Currently, the Board is composed of six independent directors.
Standards for Evaluating Director Independence
NYSE Section 303A.02 establishes general standards to evaluate directors’ independence (no director qualifies as “independent” unless the Board of directors affirmatively determines that the director has no material relationship with the listed company (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the company)), and emphasizes that the concern is independence from management. The board is also required, on a case by case basis, to express an opinion with regard to the independence or lack of independence, of each individual director.
To qualify as an “independent” or “non-independent” director, CNV standards are substantially similar to NYSE standards. CNV standards provide that independence is required with respect to the Bank, and to its controlling shareholders or to shareholders with material holdings (15% or more), and that, for any person to be appointed as an independent director, such person must not perform executive functions within the Bank. Close relatives of any persons who would not qualify as “independent directors” would also not be considered “independent”.
Non-management Directors Meetings
Under NYSE Section 303A.03, non-management directors must meet at regularly scheduled executive meetings not attended by management. Neither Argentine law nor BBVA Francés’ by-laws require that any such meetings be held.
Nominations Corporate Governance Committee
Under NYSE Section 303A.04, listed companies shall have a “nominations/corporate governance committee” comprised entirely of independent directors. GR 606/12 requires for companies which publicly offer their securities to have a Nomination Committee. Moreover, pursuant to CNV Standards, the person who nominates a director shall report at the shareholders’ meeting whether or not the nominee is an “independent person”, based on criteria established by CNV (which are substantially similar to NYSE standards).
Compensation Committee
Under NYSE Section 303A.05(a), listed companies had to have a “Compensations Committee” comprised entirely of independent directors. Under NYSE Section 303A.05(b), the “Compensations Committee” shall have a written charter establishing certain minimum responsibilities as set forth in NYSE Section 303A.05(b)(i). In addition, amendments approved by the NYSE in January 2013 require the charter to specify the rights and responsibilities of the compensation committee regarding the authority to retain advisers and to provide funding for such advisers. Certain specified factors must be considered regarding such advisers’ independence from management. GR 606/12 also requires for companies which publicly offer their securities to have a Compensation Committee.
The CGS sets forth the creation of a Nominations and Compensations Committee, composed of three non-executive directors, most of them independent, whose duties, among others, are to fix the rules and procedures for the selection of key executives and senior staff, to determine the level of remuneration for directors and key executives, to fix policies and practices regarding remunerations and benefits and to approve any relevant changes.
184
Audit Committee (II)
Under NYSE Section 303A.06, listed companies must have an “audit committee” that complies with SEC requirements. Foreign private issuers shall have this audit committee in place prior to July 31, 2005. Law No. 26,831 and CNV’s standards require BBVA Francés to have its audit committee in place on or prior to May 28, 2004. The Audit Committee (II) of BBVA Francés currently complies with the standards of Law No. 26,831.
Under NYSE Section 303A.07(a), the audit committee shall consist of at least three members. All of its members shall be financially literate or must acquire such financial knowledge within a reasonable period and at least one of its members shall have experience in accounting or financial administration. Argentine law also requires the Audit Committee to be comprised of at least three members. Pursuant to CNV’s standards, audit committee members are required to be conversant in business, financial, or accounting issues. CNV’s rules provide for the training of its members to carry out their duties and BBVA Francés engages in this training.
Under NYSE Section 303A.07(a), if a member of the audit committee is simultaneously a member of the audit committee of more than three public companies, and the listed company does not limit the number of audit committees on which its members may serve, then, in each case the board shall determine whether the simultaneous service would prevent such member from effectively serving on the listed company’s audit committee, and shall report its decision in the annual proxy statement of the company or in the company’s annual report filed with the SEC. No such provision regarding an audit committee member’s simultaneous membership on public companies exists under Argentine law or BBVA Francés’ by-laws.
Under NYSE Section 303A.07(a), all members of the audit committee are required to be “independent”. In accordance with Law No. 26,831, a majority of the members of Audit Committee (II) are “independent”.
Under NYSE Section 303A.07(b), the audit committee shall have a charter establishing the duties and responsibilities of its members, including, at a minimum, some of the duties and responsibilities required by Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and as set forth in NYSE Section 303A.7(b) of the NYSE Manual. The functions and responsibilities of the audit committee in Argentina, established by Law No. 26,831 and CNV’s standards, are essentially the same as provided for under Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act.
NYSE Sections 303A.07(b)(iii) A), (B) and (C) establish the duties and responsibilities of the audit committee, among others: (i) to discuss the annual audited financial statements and the quarterly financial statements of the company with management and the independent auditor, including the information disclosed under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations” and (ii) to discuss the company’s press releases relating to its earnings, as well as the financial information and guidelines relating to its earnings that are supplied to equity researchers and rating agencies. No such provision is contained in the Argentine law or BBVA Francés’ by-laws. However, CNV standards establish similar functions for the audit committee, namely, “to verify the reliability of the administrative-accounting system, and of all financial data, or of any significant data submitted to CNV and to self-regulated exchanges, in compliance with the applicable reporting regime”.
NYSE Section 303A.07(b)(iii)(G) provides that the audit committee shall establish clear policies for hiring external auditors’ employees. No such provision regarding hiring external auditors’ employees is contained in Argentine law or BBVA Francés’ by-laws.
NYSE Section 303A.07(c) provides that each company must have an internal audit function in order to provide to the management and to the audit committee permanent assessments on the company’s risk management processes and internal control system. BBVA Francés has an Audit Committee according to Central Bank’s rules, which provides to the management permanent assessments about management and operating processes, and risks of the company.
Disclosure of Corporate Governance Guidelines
NYSE Section 303A.09 provides that companies must adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines, including several issues for which such reporting is mandatory, and include such information on the company’s website, which should also include the charters of the Audit Committee, the Nominations Committee and the Compensation Committee.
Law No. 26,831 required additional information that companies must include in their annual reports, including information relating to the decision-making organization (corporate governance), the company’s internal controls system, rules for director and manager compensation, stock-options, and any other compensation system applicable to Board members and managers. Law No. 26,831 does not address the remaining issues included in NYSE Section 303A.09. However, all relevant information sent by the Bank to the CNV is forwarded to the CNV through the CNV’s Financial Reporting Highway and may be viewed on the CNV’s website.
185
Evaluation of Board Performance
Under NYSE Section 303A.09, the Board of directors must make a self-assessment of its performance at least once a year to determine if it or its committees function effectively and report thereon. Under Argentine law, the board’s performance is evaluated at the annual shareholders’ meeting.
Code of Ethics
NYSE Section 303A.10 provides for the adoption of a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and sets out the topics that such code must contain. BBVA Francés’ Board approved in December 18, 2003 a “Code of Conduct of BBVA Francés and its group of companies in Argentina”, which applies to all management and employees, with no exceptions, the English translation of which is available to the public on BBVA Francés’ website. See “Item 16B. Code of Ethics”. BBVA Francés believes that its Code of Conduct complies with the NYSE requirements.
Certifications by the CEO
NYSE Section 303A.12(a) provides that the CEO shall on a yearly basis certify to NYSE that he/she knows of no violation by the company of NYSE Sections relating to corporate governance. No such certification is required by Argentine law or by BBVA Francés’ by-laws.
Notification of Non-fulfillment
Under NYSE Section 303A.12(b), the CEO shall notify the NYSE in writing whenever any executive officer of the company becomes aware of any substantial non-fulfilment of any applicable provision under NYSE Section 303A.
No such provision regarding notification of non-fulfilment of NYSE Section 303A is contained in Argentine law or BBVA Francés’ by-laws, but BBVA Francés’ CEO will comply with the notice provisions as set forth under NYSE Section 303A.12(b).
186
- PART III -
ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
We have responded to Item 18 in lieu of this item.
ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Reference is made to Item 19 for a list of the financial statements filed as a part of this annual report.
ITEM 19. EXHIBITS
187
ExhibitNumber
Description
(*) Incorporated by reference to the BBVA Francés Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed with the SEC on April 10, 2015.
We will furnish to the SEC, upon request, copies of any unfiled instruments that define the rights of holders of long-term debt of BBVA Francés.
188
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.
Date: April 26, 2016
189
BBVA BANCO FRANCÉS S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
F-1
Report of Independent Registered
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING Firm
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of BBVA BANCO FRANCÉS S.A. and subsidiaries composing the BBVA BANCO FRANCÉS Group (the “Bank” – Note 2.1. to the Consolidated Financial Statements) as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash and cash equivalents flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended December 31, 2015 (all stated in thousands of Argentine Pesos). These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Bank’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statements presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to in paragraph 1 present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of BBVA BANCO FRANCÉS S.A. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and the results of their operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash and cash equivalents flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with the accounting rules established by the Argentine Central Bank (“BCRA”, for its Spanish acronym) applicable to consolidated financial statements.
Accounting rules established by the BCRA vary in certain significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). Information relating to the nature and effect of such differences is presented in Note 25 to the consolidated financial statements.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America), the Bank’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated April 26, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Bank’s internal control over financial reporting.
F-2
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014
Stated in thousands of Pesos
The accompanying Notes 1 to 25 are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-3
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS—(Continued)
F-4
F-5
F-6
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
F-7
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS—(Continued)
F-8
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS FLOWS
F-9
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS FLOWS—(Continued)
F-10
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
At December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 the Bank entered into forward, unsettled spot and repurchase contracts to buy or sell foreign currencies, listed Government and other securities at future dates, exchanging non-cash assets or liabilities for other non-cash assets or liabilities (see Note 24.6).
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION OF CERTAIN CASH MOVEMENTS
At December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, taxes paid amounted to 4,290,652, 2,875,801 and 2,118,679, respectively. At such dates, interest-paid amounted to 5,939,645, 5,037,397 and 2,827,236, respectively.
F-11
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Non-capitalized contributions
Movements
CapitalStock(1)
Issuancepremiums(1)
Adjustments to stockholders’ equity(1)
Legal
Other
Unappropriatedearnings
F-12
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1—CORPORATE SITUATION AND BANK’S ACTIVITIES
BBVA Banco Francés S.A. (hereinafter indistinctly referred to as either “BBVA Francés” or the “Bank”) has its headquarter in Buenos Aires, Argentina, and operates a 251-branch network.
As from December, 1996, BBVA Francés is part of Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A.'s (BBVA) global strategy, which controls the Bank, direct and indirectly, with 75.95% of the corporate stock of December 31, 2015.
Part of the Bank’s corporate stock is publicly traded and has been registered with the Buenos Aires Stock Exchange, New York Stock Exchange and Madrid Stock Exchange.
Changes in the Bank’s capital stock during the last 5 fiscal years are as follows:
Form of
placement
Amount
(in thousands)
In September 2011 the total number of authorized and issued ordinary shares, par value 1.00 each, increased by 516,544 as a result of the merger by absorption of Consolidar Comercializadora S.A. into BBVA Francés.
On March 26, 2012, the Ordinary and Extraordinary General Shareholders’ Meetings of BBVA Francés and Inversora Otar S.A. (“Otar”) approved the preliminary merger agreement, for which the Bank approved the increase in capital stock by issuing 50,410,182 book-entry, ordinary shares with a par value of Ps.1 each and 1 vote per share. In addition, immediately after the above-mentioned capital increase, BBVA Francés would redeem the 50,410,182 book-entry, ordinary shares, with a par value of Ps.1 each and right to 1 vote each that it owns subject to the previous capital stock reduction stemming from the merger.
As of December 31, 2015 the capital stock of the Bank consists of 536,877,850 Ordinary Shares, par value 1.00 each, all of which are issued and available to stockholders.
The “Adjustments to stockholders’ equity” caption in the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity represents:
F-14
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The composition of “Adjustments to stockholders’ equity” is as follows:
2015 and 2014
In August 2002, due to the issuance of 158,496,540 shares subscription (value 1 per share), at 3.59 each, the Bank received 590,996 over the nominal value of the shares that had been recorded under the “Issuance Premiums” account, totalizing 934,211 at December 31, 2003. In April 2004, due to the issuance of 103,232,874 shares subscription (value 1 per share) at 3.53 each, the Bank received 261,179 over the nominal value of the shares that had been recorded under the “Issuance Premiums” account. The Stockholders’ Meeting held on April 28, 2005 resolved the absorption of cumulative losses by 1,020,258, totalizing 175,132 at December 31, 2010. Finally, in September 2011, due to the issuance of 516,544 shares subscription (value 1 per share) according to the merger by absorption of Consolidar Comercializadora S.A. into BBVA Francés, the Bank received 7,379 over the nominal value of the shares that had been recorded under the “Issuance Premiums” account, totalizing 182,511 at December 31, 2015.
BBVA Francés is a corporation established under the laws of the Argentine Republic, and the responsibility of its stockholders is limited to the value of the paid - in shares, in accordance with Law No. 19,550. As a result, in compliance with Law No. 25,738, it is hereby informed that neither the foreign capital majority stockholders nor the local or foreign stockholders will respond, in excess of the mentioned paid-in stockholding, for the liabilities arising out of the transactions performed by the financial institution.
As of the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, Otar held in its name 50,410,182 book-entry, ordinary shares, with a par value of Ps.1 each and right to 1 vote each in the capital stock of BBVA Francés.
On February 9, 2012, BBVA Francés and Otar entered into a “Preliminary Merger Agreement” whereby BBVA Francés incorporates Otar on the basis of these companies’ financial statements as of December 31, 2011 and Otar goes through a dissolution without liquidation process.
On March 26, 2012, the Ordinary and Extraordinary General Shareholders’ Meetings of BBVA Francés and Otar approved the above mentioned preliminary merger agreement, the consolidated financial statements for merging purposes as of December 31, 2011 and the shares’ exchange ratio.
The Shareholders’ Meeting of BBVA Francés above mentioned, approved the increase in capital stock of BBVA Francés by issuing 50,410,182 book-entry, ordinary shares with a par value of Ps.1 each and 1 vote per share, that
F-15
would be listed for public offering at the Buenos Aires Stock Exchange in order to be delivered to the shareholders of Otar. These shares would be issued as soon as the merger is registered with the Public Registry of Commerce.
In addition, immediately after the above-mentioned capital increase, BBVA Francés would redeem the 50,410,182 book-entry, ordinary shares, with a par value of Ps.1 each and right to 1 vote each that it owns subject to the previous capital stock reduction stemming from the merger.
The parties have agreed to set April 1, 2012 as the effective date for the merger as that was the date when all the assets and liabilities of the merged company were transferred, for 390,971 and 5,668, respectively.
On July 18, 2013, the Argentine Central Bank (BCRA) resolved not to make any observations against the merger by absorption of Otar by BBVA Francés through its Resolution No. 473. On August 8, 2013, the CNV approved the merger by absorption in accordance with Section 82 of the Argentine Companies Law pursuant to its Resolution No. 17,155. On March 27, 2014, the merger was registered with the Supervisory Board of Companies (IGJ) under No. 5,302 of Book 68 of Stock Corporations. Finally, 50,410,182 book-entry, ordinary shares with par value Ps.1 each and 1 vote per share of BBVA Francés were redeemed and 50,410,182 book-entry, ordinary shares with par value Ps.1 each and 1 vote per share of BBVA Francés were simultaneously issued and delivered in exchange to Otar’s former shareholders, according to the following detail:
The merger by absorption of Otar by BBVA Francés was thus completed, with BBVA Francés becoming the surviving company to all intents and purposes.
According to the provisions in Section Three of its By-laws and with the authorization granted by Argentine Central Bank (“BCRA”), the Entity is authorized to carry out all the transactions and activities covered by Section 24 of the Law of Financial Institutions and other expressly authorized by BCRA. On April 22, 2009, the Entity started to receive deposits and therefore, it participates in the Deposit Guarantee Fund created by Law No. 24,485.
The Capital Markets Law No. 26,831, enacted on December 28, 2012 and then regulated by CNV’s General Resolution No. 622/13 on September 5, 2013 sets forth, in its Section 47 that agents are under a duty to register with the CNV for interacting with the market in any of the modalities established in CNV’s General Resolution No. 622/13. On September 9 and 19, 2014, the Bank was finally registered as Mutual Funds’ Custodian Agent, and Settlement and Clearing Agent – Comprehensive, respectively, under numbers 4 and 42.
F-16
NOTE 2—EQUITY INVESTMENTS
The following summarizes the investment in, and related information of, controlled majority-owned subsidiaries which are consolidated.
The following are all positions that the Bank holds in financial and non-financial institutions wherever such a position represented an ownership in excess of 2% of the invested companies’ capital stock as of December 31, 2015.
Investment in Other Subsidiaries
NOTE 3—SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
In accordance with the procedures set forth in BCRA’s regulations and Technical Pronouncement No. 21 of the Argentine Federation of Professional Councils in Economic Sciences (FACPCE for its Spanish accronym), the Bank has consolidated - line by line - its balance sheets, statements of operations and cash and cash equivalents flows as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, as per the following detail:
The results and cash and cash equivalents flows of Consolidar Administradora de Fondos de Jubilaciones y Pensiones S.A. (undergoing liquidation proceedings) has been adjusted for purposes of comparison of the fiscal
F-17
years of companies consolidating on the basis of the twelve-month periods ended on December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.
Interests in subsidiaries are listed in Note 2.
The financial statements have been taken from the Bank's books of account in conformity with the standards of the BCRA.
By Communication “A” 3921 of the BCRA and General Resolution No. 441/03 of the CNV, in compliance with Decree 664/03 of the Federal Executive, application of the restatement method on financial statements in equivalent purchasing power has been suspended as from March 1, 2003.
Argentina’s professional accounting standards require applying Technical Pronouncement No. 6 of the Argentine Federation of Professional Councils in Economic Sciences (F.A.C.P.C.E.) (as amended by Technical Resolution No. 19) which sets forth that financial statements are to be restated in constant currency when the country’s economic environment exhibits certain characteristics. A prerequisite for the application of this pronouncement is that inflation as accumulated throughout a 3-year period, measured by the so-called Domestic Wholesale Price Index (IPIM) published by Argentina’s Official Statistics Bureau (INDEC)–the National Statistics and Censuses Institute- attains or exceeds 100%. As per the latest information released by the INDEC, inflation accumulated in the period October 31, 2012 to October 31, 2015, measured by the above-mentioned index is 66%. Therefore, the prerequisite for restatement into constant currency of the information contained in the financial statements is not satisfied. The above notwithstanding, it should be noted that if this prerequisite were satisfied, the restatement will be mandatory.
The Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2015 include comparative information with the Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2014 and 2013.
The main valuation methods used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements have been as follows:
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, such amounts were translated into pesos at the benchmark exchange rate of the BCRA as of the closing date of transactions on the last business day of each fiscal year. The exchange differences were charged to income (loss) for each fiscal year.
F-18
Federal Government secured loans – Decree No. 1387/01:
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the secured loans were valued at the highest amount resulting from a comparison between the present value as estimated by BCRA and the book value in accordance with the provisions under BCRA’s Communication “A” 5180. In addition, the amount required to take their book values to their fair realizable values is recorded in a balancing account.
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, receivables and payables have been adjusted to the CER as follows:
For loans, other receivables from financial transactions, receivables from financial leases, receivables from sale of property assets and contingent commitments: the allowances have been calculated based on the Bank’s estimated loan loss risk in light of debtor compliance and the collaterals supporting the respective transactions, as provided by Communication "A" 2950 and supplemented of the BCRA.
Interest has been accrued according to a compound interest formula in the periods in which it was generated, except interest on transactions in foreign currency, those whose maturity does not exceed 92 days, and adjustable assets and liabilities which were recognized on a linear basis.
The Bank suspends the accrual of interest generally when the related loan is non-performing and the collection of interest and principal is in doubt. Accrued interest remains on the Bank’s books and is considered a part of the loan balance when determining the allowances for doubtful loans. Interest is then recognized on a cash basis after reducing the balance of accrued interest, if applicable.
They were valued at acquisition cost plus income accrued but not collected as of December 31, 2015 and 2014.
The Bank enters into forward contracts to buy or sell foreign currencies, listed Governmental securities and other securities at future dates. Both a receivable and a payable are recognized at the time of the agreement, which reflects the amounts of cash, currency or listed securities to be exchanged at the closing date. The difference between the receivable and payable at the original transaction date (premiums) is deferred and amortized over the contract’s life.
The Bank purchases and sells foreign currencies, listed Governmental and other securities on behalf of its customers which settle another day. An asset or liability is recognized for the amount due from or to the customer and a corresponding asset or liability is recognized for the currency or listed securities to be exchanged.
F-19
The Bank’s receivables or payables representing the future receipt or delivery of currencies or securities are adjusted to reflect the current market price of such currencies or securities. The amount of such market price differences is recorded in income for the fiscal year.
Forward sales and purchases of securities were valued as follows:
They were valued based on the prices agreed upon for each transaction, plus related premiums accrued as of December 31, 2015 and 2014.
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, they were valued at the present value of the sum of the periodical instalments and the unguaranteed residual value, calculated as per the conditions agreed upon in the respective leases, applying the implicit interest rate thereto.
They have been valued according to the following methods:
Although the Entity has a 40% interest ownership in the capital stock and votes of Rombo Cía. Financiera S.A., operational and financial decisions at Rombo Cía. Financiera S.A. are taken together with this company’s majority shareholder on a joint control basis.
They have been valued at acquisition cost plus increases from prior-year appraisal revaluations, restated as explained in Note 3.2, less related accumulated depreciation calculated in proportion to the months of estimated useful life of items concerned, without exceeding their recoverable value.
They have been valued at acquisition cost less related accumulated amortization calculated in proportion to the months of estimated useful life of the items concerned.
F-20
This caption included the differences arising from compliance with court-ordered measures arising from cases challenging the current rules and regulations applicable to deposits with the financial system in the framework of the provisions of Law No. 25,561, Decree No. 214/02 and supplementary provisions. The assets mentioned (calculated on the basis of the nominal difference between the exchange rate freely determined in the market and applied to the value of the deposit recorded in the books at that date) was amortized within the 60 monthly instalments starting in April 2003 in accordance with Communication “A” 3916 of the BCRA.
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, these assets have been fully amortized, with the total accumulated amortization as of those dates amounting to 1,441,094 and 1,434,479, respectively.
The Bank, however, notifies that such amortization was solely calculated to comply with the regulations of the BCRA and that by no means does it imply a waiver to possible compensation or recovery of the exchange difference resulting from compliance with court orders corresponding to petitions for protection of civil rights or other court action derived from the mandatory conversion of bank deposits into pesos.
Pursuant to the decisions handed down by Argentina’s Supreme Court of Justice (“Massa, Juan Agustín v. Argentine Executive Branch – Executive Order 1570/ et al over action for the protection of constitutional rights (amparo) Law No. 16,986” and “Kujarchuk v. Argentine Executive Branch”), a calculation method was established for the payment of bank deposits that was different from the one that had been instituted by the Argentine Executive Branch.
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Bank has estimated this contingency and it has recorded allowances for the total amount.
The Bank expects that the Argentine State remedies the significant damage resulting from compliance with court-ordered measures on petitions for protection of civil rights and actions for relief, particularly due to the impact of differences in compensation or recovery as per the rulings in the above-mentioned actions and according to the law in relation to the “pesification” of the underlying deposits. In this regard, the Bank has informed of such financial damages to the relevant authorities, with reservation of rights.
Interest rate swaps and Forward transactions:
Repo and Reverse Repo transactions
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the repos whose underlying assets are not subject to the volatilities published by BCRA were valued as per the cost of each transaction and the repos whose underlying assets are subject to volatility were recorded at their quoted value. Accrued premiums were charged to income (loss) for each fiscal year.
The Bank expenses employee termination pay as disbursed.
They include the debit balances non arising out of transactions relating to the supply and demand of financial resources, plus the adjustments and interest payable accrued as of December 31, 2015 and 2014.
F-21
It includes the estimated amounts to meet contingencies of probable occurrence that, if occurred, would give rise to a loss for the Bank.
They are restated as explained in Note 3.2., except for the “Capital Stock” and “Non capitalized contributions” accounts which have been kept at cost. The adjustment resulting from the restatement is included in the “Adjustment to Stockholders´ Equity – Adjustment to Capital Stock” account.
The Consolidated Statements of Cash and Cash Equivalents Flows as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 explains the changes in cash and its equivalents. For such purpose, a detail is supplied of the items that the Bank considers to be cash and its equivalents:
Items b) and c) are considered to be cash equivalents under BCRA standards because they are held in order to meet short-term commitments, they are readily convertible in known cash amounts, they are subject to insignificant risk of changes in value and their maturity is less than three months as from the end of each fiscal year date.
The preparation of the financial statements in accordance with the standards set forth by the BCRA require the Bank to use assumptions and estimates that affect certain assets such as allowances for doubtful loan and certain liabilities such as provisions for other contingencies as well as the reported amounts of income/loss during the fiscal year. Actual income/loss may differ from such estimates.
NOTE 4—DIFFERENCES BETWEEN BCRA ACCOUNTING STANDARDS AND ARGENTINE PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
The Bank has prepared these Consolidated Financial Statements by applying the regulations of the BCRA, which do not contemplate some of the valuation criteria established by the Argentine Professional Accounting Standards.
F-22
The main differences between the regulations of the BCRA and the Argentine Professional Accounting Standards are detailed below:
As already indicated hereinbelow, in Note 5.1., the Bank has received various communications from the BCRA pursuant to which that BCRA indicates that the capitalization of items arising from the application of the deferred tax method is not allowed. In accordance with Argentine professional accounting standards, a deferred tax asset should be recognized to the extent the reversal of temporary differences generates a future decrease in the tax effectively determined. As a result, the allowances set up by the Bank in this respect, for 266,690 and 252,877 as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, should be reversed.
As explained in Notes 3.4.14. and 12, as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Bank recorded the effects of interest rate swap agreements as established by the BCRA. Should the Bank had applied the Argentine professional accounting standards, the stockholders’ equity would have decreased in 32,906 and increased 8,813, respectively. By contrast, the effect of the application of the professional accounting standards on the income statement for the fiscal years ended ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 would have been 41,719 (loss), 26,366 (income) and 25,996 (loss), respectively.
Arising from the application of the accounting standards laid down by BCRA and the Argentine Professional Accounting Standards:
NOTE 5—TAX MATTERS
The Bank determined the charge for income tax by applying the statutory 35% rate to taxable income estimated for fiscal year considering the effect of temporary differences between valuation of assets and liabilities for accounting purposes and their taxable bases. The Bank considered as temporary differences those that have a definitive reversal date in subsequent years.
As of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the Bank recorded 2,050,470, 1,670,724 and 1,121,460, respectively, in the Income tax caption as the estimate of the income tax charge payable to the tax authorities for these fiscal years.
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Bank has booked 517,823 and 836,822, respectively, in the caption Other liabilities – Other – Accrued Taxes as a result of having netted the income tax withholdings and other withholdings applied to the Bank until such dates.
F-23
Besides, on June 19, 2003, the Bank received a note from the BCRA indicating that the capitalization of items arising from the application of the deferred tax method is not allowed.
On June 26, 2003, the Bank, based on the opinion of its legal counsel, responded the above mentioned note, indicating that in their opinion the rules of the BCRA do not prohibit the application of the deferred tax method generated by the recognition of temporary differences between the accounting and tax result. Subsequently, Resolution 118/03 of the Superintendent of Financial and Exchange Institutions received on October 7, 2003 confirmed the terms of the note dated June 19, 2003. Consequently, as from that date the Bank set up an allowance for the net balance between the deferred tax assets and liabilities.
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Bank recorded under Other Receivables a taxable deferred asset amounting 301,081 and 295,155, respectively. Such amounts are made up as follows:
Tax on minimum presumed income (TOMPI) was established by Law No. 25,063 in the year ended December 31, 1998, for a ten-year term. On December 19, 2008 Law No. 26,426 established a one-year extension in TOMPI until December 30, 2009. In turn, Law No. 26,545, published in the Official Gazette on December 2, 2009 extended TOMPI for an additional ten-year period. This tax is supplementary to income tax: while the latter is levied on the taxable income for the year, TOMPI is a minimum levy determined by applying the current 1% rate on the potential income of certain productive assets. Therefore, the Bank’s tax obligation for each year will coincide with the highest of these taxes. The above Law provides that institutions governed by Financial Institutions Law must consider as a tax base 20% of their taxable assets, after deducting non-computable ones. However, if TOMPI exceeds income tax in a given year, the excess thereof may be computed as a payment on account of any income tax in excess of TOMPI that may occur in any of the following ten years.
In every year that net operating losses are offset, the tax benefit (the benefit of the effective rate on the net operating loss used) will be realized to the extent that income tax (net of the offsetting) equals or exceeds tax on minimum presumed income, but will be reduced by any excess of the latter over former.
On February 11, 2005, the Argentine Central Bank issued Communication “A” 4295 whereby it enabled, under certain rules, the accounting record of credits on Tax on Minimum Presumed Income.
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Income tax assessed was higher than the TOMPI. Therefore, a provision was raised for Income tax..
On April 28, 2009, the Court of Appeals with Federal Jurisdiction over Contentious Administrative Matters, Panel 3 handed down a judgment favourable to a petition filed by the Bank for the judge to suspend the effect of the decision made by administrative authorities until the appeal is decided. The judgment thus ordered that “….subject to a sworn promise to comply … a) the Tax Bureau of the City of Buenos Aires must suspend the sua sponte
F-24
assessment that has objected to the treatment afforded by BBVA Francés to the bonds received from the National Government in the terms of Decree No. 905-02 and the related foreign exchange gains/losses in all matters related to taxation for turnover tax purposes for the fiscal period 2002; b) therefore, the Tax Bureau of the City of Buenos Aires must abstain from demanding that the Bank should pay any amount due that may have arisen from the items above detailed”.
Also in this respect, on May 13, 2009, an action for a declaratory judgment was commenced by the Bank against the Tax Bureau of the City of Buenos Aires, currently being heard by the court with original Federal Jurisdiction over Contentious Administrative Matters No. 1, to procure a judgment ascertaining that a) the bonds received by the Bank from the National Government as compensation for the asymmetric conversion into pesos of assets and liabilities imposed by the Executive Order No. 905/2002 may not be levied with Turnover Tax in the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires; b) the foreign exchange gains/losses are a direct effect of the modification of the monetary system and therefore should not be levied with Turnover Tax in the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires.
On December 29, 2010, the Judge presiding over the court with original Federal Jurisdiction over Contentious Administrative Matters No. 1 handed down a new precautionary measure.
The Bank as well as its legal and tax advisors estimate that the Bank has made a reasonable interpretation of currently applicable rules and regulations concerning the fiscal periods objected to by the Tax Bureau of the City of Buenos Aires and do not expect an adverse financial impact in these respects.
As regards the remaining balance of the amount claimed, the Bank adhered to a scheme of payment in instalments that was settled on October 4, 2010.
On February 3, 2015, the Bank was notified of the passage of Resolution No. 2014-3711-DGR, which conceded the appeal in part.
This Resolution was appealed by lodging a so-called “hierarchical appeal” with the head of the governmental agency in charge of raising public revenue, which was rejected, thus putting an end to the administrative stage.
For the sole purpose of being able to continue with the submission of the lawsuit , dated November 24, 2015, the Entity paid the amount claimed, which does not entail its acceptance of the claim.
Therefore, the General Office of Individualized Audits amended the Tax Adjustment form and partially granted the Entity’s claim. The new adjustment notified by said office was settled on October 30, 2015 through an installment plan, with no further actions being taken.
NOTE 6— BREAKDOWN OF MAIN ITEMS AND ACCOUNTS
Detailed below are the balances of those accounts:
F-25
F-26
F-27
NOTE 7— PENALTIES IMPOSED ON THE BANK AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS INSTITUTED BY THE BCRA
In compliance with the requirement imposed by the Argentine Central Bank’s Communication “A” 5689, issued on January 8, 2015, the following is a detail of the administrative and/or disciplinary penalties as well as the sentences imposed by criminal trial courts, enforced or brought by the Argentine Central Bank, the Financial Information Unit (UIF) and the Argentine Securities Commission (CNV) of which the Bank has been notified:
F-28
It has been the UIF’s understanding that the profile of the customers, as defined, and the supporting documentation submitted by the Bank do not coincide with the possibility of receiving such wire transfers.
In due time, the Bank filed its defenses, offered evidence and petitioned for an acquittal. In addition, the Bank called for the enforcement in this case of the same guarantees available in court proceedings, argued that the statute of limitations applicable to punishable offenses had run out and further claimed that Law No. 25,246 is unconstitutional when it comes to the scale of penalties imposed.
On October, 13 and September, 14 2010, the Bank was served with the Resolutions No. 181/10 and 169/10 adopted by the UIF whereby BBVA Francés was ordered to pay a fine for an amount equivalent to one time the transactions objected for the amounts of 39,393 and 9,174, respectively.
On the basis of its legal advisors’ opinion, on October 28 and November 25, 2010, the Bank lodged with the Court of Appeals with Federal Jurisdiction over Contentious Administrative Matters a direct appeal against the UIF’s Resolutions in connection with the wire transfers for 9,174 and 39,393, respectively, in accordance with the provisions under Section 25 of Law No. 25,246.
On July 16, 2015, the Court of Appeals with Federal Jurisdiction over Contentious Administrative Matters, Panel IV repealed UIF’s Resolution No. 181/10, and thus the fine previously imposed was rendered ineffective. On September 22, 2015, the court decided to reject the extraordinary appeals filed by the UIF against such decision. The UIF lodged an appeal with the Supreme Court of Justice claiming that its prior appeals had been unfairly rejected. That appeal has been dismissed to date.
The Bank and its legal advisors have concluded that the analysis of the transactions involved has been made in compliance with applicable legal regulations and that no Suspicious Transaction Report (“ROS”, for its Spanish acronym) has proven necessary. For such reason, the Bank does not expect any adverse financial impacts in this respect. The above notwithstanding, as from January 2015 and to comply with the provisions under Communication “A” 5689 of the Argentine Central Bank, the Bank has raised a provision for 48,567.
It must be mentioned that the Regulatory Compliance Officer designated as of that date was also sanctioned in both cases.
Summary proceedings instituted by the Argentine Securities Commission (CNV) notified on January 6, 2009. The subject matter of the complaint is alleged breach of the CNV Rules and Law 24,083. The cause of action underlying the complaint is the presumed non-compliance with the conditions for the subscription of a mutual fund (FCI Acciones Globales) as there was a failure to have them embodied and published in the fund’s Management Rules. The complaint points out that the subscription could only be conducted in USD “currency” rather than in USD “notes”. This notwithstanding, the Rules set forth that subscription is in US Dollars and does not distinguish between currency or note USDs, therefore, there was no need for amending the Rules. Pursuant to Resolution No. 16,821 notified on May 31, 2012, a decision was made to impose on the Bank a 250 fine. The seven regular members of the Board of Directors as of the date of these events were also sanctioned. An appeal has been lodged against the Resolution that imposes the fine with the Appellate Court in Commercial Matters in and for the City of Buenos Aires. Pursuant to Law No. 26,831, a jurisdictional issue has emerged between the Appellate Court in Commercial Matters and the Argentine Administrative and Contentious Appellate Court. The file has been sent to the Supreme Court of Justice which in December 2014 decided that the Appellate Court with jurisdiction in commercial matters is the court that must hear in the case. On November 4, 2015, the Entity was served notice of
F-29
the judgment rendered by the Court of Appeals on Commercial Matters, confirming the fine and reducing it to 100. The Entity paid that fine on December 1, 2015.
Administrative Proceedings for Foreign Exchange Offense investigated by the Argentine Central Bank notified on February 22, 2008 and identified under No. 3511, File 100.194/05, on grounds of a breach of the Criminal Foreign Exchange Regime of foreign currency by reason of purchases and sales of US Dollars through BCRA in excess of the authorized amounts. These total 44 transactions involving the branches 099, 342, 999 and 320. Accused of these breaches stand BBVA Banco Francés S.A. and the following Bank officers who served in the capacities described below at the date when the breaches were perpetrated: (i) two Territory Managers, (ii) four Branch Managers, (iii) four Heads of Back-Office Management and (iv) twelve cashiers. On August 21, 2014, the trial court acquitted all the accused from all charges. The State Attorney’s Office filed an appeal and the Panel A of the Appellate Court with jurisdiction over criminal and economic matters confirmed the Bank’s and the involved officers’ acquittal from all charges. The State Attorney’s Office lodged an extraordinary appeal which was granted and, as of the date of these financial statements, is being heard by the Supreme Court of Justice.
F-30
Managers, (vii) five Main Cashiers and (viii) one cashier. The discovery period was closed and the proceedings will be soon submitted to federal local courts.
F-31
F-32
The Bank and its legal advisors estimate that the applicable rules and regulations have been reasonably interpreted and that no adverse financial impacts are expected in these respects.
NOTE 8—RESTRICTIONS ON ASSETS
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, there are Bank’s assets, which are restricted as follows:
F-33
NOTE 9—BANK DEPOSIT GUARANTEE INSURANCE SYSTEM
The Bank is included in the Deposit Guarantee System established by Law 24,485, Regulatory Decrees No. 540/95, No. 1,292/96 and 1,127/98 and BCRA’s Communication “A” 5659.
Such law provided for the creation of the Company Seguros de Depósitos Sociedad Anónima (SEDESA) for purposes of managing the Deposit Guarantee Fund (DGF), whose shareholders, in accordance with the changes introduced by Decree No. 1,292/96, shall be the BCRA with one share as a minimum and the trustees of the trust created by the financial institutions in the proportion to be determined for each by the BCRA according to their contributions to the DGF.
That Company was incorporated in August 1995 and the Bank holds a 9.2771% interest in its capital stock.
The Deposit Guarantee System, which is limited, compulsory and onerous, has been created for purposes of covering the bank deposit risks subsidiarily and complementarily to the deposit protection and privilege system established by the Financial Institutions Law.
The guarantee shall cover the repayment of principal disbursed plus interest accrued through the date of revoking of the authorization to operate or through the date of suspension of the institution through application of section 49 of the BCRA’s Charter provided that the latter had been adopted earlier than the former without exceeding the amount of pesos a three hundred and fifty thousand. Regarding operations in the name of two or more people, the guarantee shall be prorated between the holders. In no event shall the total guarantee per person exceed the above-mentioned amount, whatever the number of accounts and/or deposits.
NOTE 10—TRUST ACTIVITIES
On January 5, 2001, the BCRA’s Board of Directors issued Resolution No. 19/01, providing for the exclusion of Mercobank S.A.’s senior liabilities under the terms of section 35 bis of the Financial Institutions Law, the authorization to transfer the excluded assets to the Bank as trustee of the Diagonal Trust, and the authorization to transfer the excluded liabilities to beneficiary banks. Also, on the mentioned date, the agreement to set up the Diagonal Trust was subscribed by Mercobank S.A. as settle and the Bank as trustee in relation to the exclusion of assets as provided in the resolution above-mentioned. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the assets of Diagonal Trust amount to 2,427 and 2,428, respectively, considering its recoverable value.
Besides, the Bank in its capacity as Trustee in the Corp Banca Trust recorded the selected assets on account of the redemption in kind of participation certificates for 4,177 as of December 31, 2015 and 2014.
Besides, the Bank acts as trustee in 13 non-financial trusts, and in no case being personally liable for the liabilities assumed in the performance of the contract obligations; such liabilities will be settled with and up to the full amount of the corpus assets and the proceeds therefrom. The non financial trusts concerned were set up to secure the receivables of several creditors (beneficiaries) and the trustee was entrusted the management, care, preservation and custody of the corpus assets until (i) the requirements to show the noncompliance with the obligations by the debtor (settler) vis-à-vis the creditors (beneficiaries) are met, moment at which such assets will be sold and the proceeds therefrom will be distributed (net of expenses) among all beneficiaries, the remainder (if any) being delivered to the settler, or (ii) all contract terms and conditions are complied with, in which case all the corpus assets will be returned to the settler or to whom it may indicate. The trust assets represent about 151,400 and 155,354 as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, consist of cash, creditors' rights, real estate and shares.
F-34
NOTE 11—CORPORATE BONDS
On July 15, 2003, an Extraordinary Stockholders’ Meeting approved the setting up of a Program for the issuance and re-issuance of ordinary Corporate Bonds (non-convertible into shares) with ordinary guarantee, or such guarantees as may be decided by the Bank, and unsecured Subordinated Corporate Bonds, convertible or not into shares. During the life of the Program, which was 5 (five) years, it was possible to issue and re-issue any number of series and/or classes of Corporate Bonds as long as at all times the maximum amount in circulation after adding together all series and/or classes outstanding under the Program pending redemption does not exceed at any time US$ 300,000,000 (or the equivalent thereof in other currencies). The Program was approved by CNV Resolution No. 14,967 dated November 29, 2004.
The Global Program was amended according to the resolutions adopted by the Ordinary and Extraordinary Stockholders’ Meeting held on April 26, 2007; extended for 5 (five) years by resolution adopted by the Ordinary and Extraordinary Stockholders’ Meetings held on March 28, 2008 and on April 9, 2013 (approved by the CNV by Resolutions No. 16,010 and No. 17,127 dated November 6, 2008 and July 11, 2013, respectively); and the maximum amount of the issuance was successively increased from US$ 300,000,000 to US$ 500,000,000 and from US$ 500,000,000 to US$ 750,000,000 by resolution adopted by the Ordinary and Extraordinary Stockholders’ Meetings held on March 30, 2011 and March 26, 2012, respectively.
The following is a detail of the Corporate Bonds outstanding as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:
Detail
Date of issuance
Nominal Value
Due date
Rate
Interest payments
Private Badlar +
nominal 3.69% per annum
nominal 3.25% per annum
nominal 4.24% per annum
nominal 3.80% per annum
nominal 4.70% per annum
nominal 2.50% per annum
nominal 3.75% per annum
nominal 2.53% per annum
nominal 4% per annum
nominal 3.50% per annum
nominal 4.08% per annum
F-35
The issued Corporate Bonds were fully subscribed and paid in and they will be fully amortized at maturity.
As provided for in the Corporate Bonds Law and the BCRA regulations, the proceeds obtained from the issuance of Classes 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 17 and 18 were applied to the reimbursement of time deposits, the proceeds from the issuance of Class 15 were applied to the grant of working capital loans and those obtained from the issuance of Class 16 were applied to the reimbursement Corporate Bonds Class 8.
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the outstanding principal and accrued interest amount to 1,799,245 (in connection with Class 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17 and 18 of the Corporate Bonds) and 1,725,644 (in connection with Class 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 of the Corporate Bonds), respectively.
On July 24, 2008, the General Shareholders Meeting authorized the issuance of Corporate Bonds for an amount of up to Ps.300,000,000 or its equivalent in other currencies within the framework of a Global Program according to Law No. 23,576, as amended by complementary and regulatory rules. The Shareholders Meeting approved the application for access to the public offer system in order to create such program before the CNV.
On October 22, 2008, by Resolution No. 16,003, the CNV approved the Global Program for the Issuance of Corporate Bonds and the Public Offer of each series of Corporate Bonds to be issued.
On August 21, 2012 the General Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting of PSA Finance Argentina Compañía Financiera S.A. resolved to increase the maximum amount of the Global Program for the issuance of Corporate Bonds from 300,000 to 800,000. Finally the CNV approved, by Resolution No. 16,947 dated October 17, 2012.
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the characteristics of each of the corporate bond series so issued are detailed below:
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the balance of capital and interest accrued at year end amounts to 103,317 and 215,504, respectively.
According to the provisions of the Corporate Bonds Law and BCRA regulations, the funds obtained from all the series were applied to the granting of loans for the purchase of motor vehicles.
F-36
NOTE 12—DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
These transactions have been valued in accordance with the criteria described in Note 3.4.14.(i) recognizing the amount of 42,621 as income for the fiscal year.
The estimated fair value of said instruments amounts to 30,988 (Liabilities). For fair value estimation purposes, the variable and fixed as yet not matured future flows are discounted, with the swap value being the difference between the present value of the future flows receivable and the present value of the future flows payable.
As of the end of the fiscal year, the above transactions were recorded under “Memorandum Accounts - Debit Accounts – Derivatives – Interest rate swap” for 933,053.
Said transaction was consummated as hedge for potential volatility in the cash flows arising from certain financing deals attributable to changes in the designated benchmark interest rates and it has proven to be effective hedge for the risk mentioned.
The aim pursued by risk management consists in reducing exposure to changes in cash flows arising from financing deals. Thanks to the hedge established, changes in the cash flows arising from the underlying instrument caused by changes in the benchmark interest rate would decrease as a result of having been offset with the changes in the cash flows arising from the hedge instrument.
As of the end of the fiscal year the above transaction was recorded under “Memorandum Accounts - Debit Accounts –Derivatives – Interest rate swap” for 30,315.
These transactions have been conducted through the MAE (Mercado Abierto Electrónico ) and ROFEX ( Mercado a Término Rosario), with daily settlement in pesos or settlement at maturity and valued in the manner described in Note 3.4.14.(ii) As of the end of fiscal year, they generated a gain of 500,661.
F-37
These transactions have been valued in accordance with the criteria described in Note 3.4.14.(i) recognizing the amount of 18,216 as income for the fiscal year.
The estimated fair value of said instruments amounts to 17,327 (Asset). For fair value estimation purposes, the variable and fixed as yet not matured future flows are discounted, with the swap value being the difference between the current value of the future flows receivable and the current value of the future flows payable.
As of the end of the fiscal year, the above transactions were recorded under “Memorandum Accounts - Debit Accounts – Derivatives – Interest rate swap” for 966,699.
As of the end of the fiscal year the above transaction was recorded under “Memorandum Accounts - Debit Accounts –Derivatives – Interest rate swap” for 36,545.
These transactions have been valued in accordance with the criteria described in Note 3.4.14.(ii), recognizing the amount of 485,423 as income for the fiscal year.
These transactions have been valued in accordance with the description in Note 3.4.8. recognizing the amount of 43,423 as income for the fiscal year.
F-38
NOTE 13—COMPLIANCE WITH CNV REQUIREMENTS
According to CNV’s General Resolution No. 622/13, the minimum Stockholders’ Equity required to operate as “Settlement and Clearing Agent – Comprehensive” and “Mutual Funds’ Custodian Agent” would amount to 19,500 and the minimum of liquid assets required by those rules would be 8,000. This amount comprises Federal Government Bonds in Pesos Badlar + 200 bp maturing in 2016 and deposited with the account opened at Caja de Valores S.A. entitled “Depositor 1647 Brokerage Account 5446483 BBVA Banco Francés Minimum Counterbalancing Entry”. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Bank’s Stockholders’ Equity exceeds the minimum amount imposed by CNV.
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, in its capacity as Custodian Agent of “FBA Ahorro Pesos”, “FBA Renta Pesos”, “FBA Calificado”, “FBA Bonos Argentina”, “FBA Horizonte”, “FBA Acciones Latinoamericanas”, “FBA Acciones Argentinas” and “FBA Bonos Globales” managed by BBVA Francés Asset Management S.A. Sociedad Gerente de Fondos Comunes de Inversión, the Bank holds certificates of deposits, repos, shares, corporate bonds, government securities, indexes, deferred payment checks, securities issued by the BCRA, Cedears, ADRS, shares in mutual funds and financial trusts in safekeeping in the amount of 7,902,234 and 5,917,790, respectively, all of which making up the Fund’s portfolio and booked in “Memorandum Accounts - Debit Accounts -Control - Other”.
The Investment Funds’ equities are as follows:
NOTE 14—EARNINGS DISTRIBUTIONS
The Bank has in place an earnings distribution policy in line with the Bank’s vocation for sustained stockholder value, which at the same time allows the Bank’s financial condition to perform favourably so as to strive for business growth and the maintenance of consistently high liquidity and solvency standards in compliance with currently applicable rules and regulations.
Restriction on earnings distributions:
F-39
On March 9, 2016 the Board of Directors resolved to amend the proposal to the shareholders about the distribution of dividends in cash for the total amount of 900,000 to be distributed in proportion to the nominal holding of each shareholder equivalent to Ps.1.67636 per share.
On April 26, 2016 at the Bank’s Ordinary and Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting, it was approved that such distribution is subject to the prior authorization of the BCRA.
NOTE 15— REFORM OF THE INTEGRATED RETIREMENT AND PENSION SYSTEM
Law No. 26,425- Dissolution and liquidation of Consolidar AFJP S.A.:
Law No. 26,425, which came into force on December 4, 2008, mandated that the capitalization system that used to be an integral part of the Integrated Retirement and Pension System was to be suppressed and replaced by a single pay-as-you-go system that is now known as the Argentine Integrated Social Security System (SIPA). As a consequence, Consolidar A.F.J.P. S.A. ceased to manage the funds held in the individual capitalization accounts opened by the members and beneficiaries of the Integrated Retirement and Pension System. Said funds were transferred to the Fund to Guarantee the Sustainability of the State-run Social Security System exactly as they had been invested and it is now the Argentine Social Security Authority (ANSES) the only and sole holder of said assets and funds.
Besides, on October 29, 2009, ANSES issued its Resolution No. 290/2009 whereby it granted a term of 30 working days to the pension fund managers that could be interested in re-converting their corporate purpose in order to manage the funds held as voluntary term deposits and as agreed-upon deposits in capitalization accounts for them to express their decision to do so.
Given the above situation and the inability of Consolidar A.F.J.P. S.A. to attain the corporate purpose and conduct the business for which it had been formed, on December 28, 2009, its Extraordinary General Unanimous Shareholders’ Meeting adopted the resolution to dissolve and subsequently liquidate Consolidar A.F.J.P. S.A. effective as of December 31, 2009 on the understanding that such will be the best alternative to safeguard the interests of both the creditors and the shareholders of the Company. In addition, as set forth in the Argentine Companies Law, the Shareholders’ Meeting decided to appoint Accountant Mr. Gabriel Orden and Mr. Rubén Lamandia to act as liquidators of Consolidar A.F.J.P. S.A. As of December 31, 2009 these gentlemen have been designated as the Company’s legal representatives. As of the date of issuance of these financial statements, they are moving forward with all the actions necessary to proceed with the liquidation of Consolidar A.F.J.P. S.A.
On January 28, 2010, the dissolution of Consolidar A.F.J.P. S.A. as well as the list of designated liquidators were registered with the Supervisory Board of Companies (IGJ)
In addition, the Extraordinary General Shareholders’ Meeting of Consolidar A.F.J.P. S.A. approved a voluntary reduction in capital stock for 75,000 on October 19, 2009. In turn, the IGJ conferred its approval to the capital reduction mentioned on January 11, 2010. In this respect, on January 19, 2010 the shareholders were transferred their capital contributions in conformity with the above-mentioned reduction.
BBVA Francés, in its capacity as shareholder requested that Consolidar A.F.J.P. S.A. (undergoing liquidation proceedings) should file a note with the Argentine Ministry of Economy and Public Finance and with the Argentine Social Security Authority to commence discussions within the framework of Law No. 26,425 in order to identify one or more resolution alternatives in connection with the consequences resulting from the events caused by the enactment of that Law. This note was filed by Consolidar A.F.J.P. S.A. (undergoing liquidation proceedings) on June 11, 2010.
On December 7, 2010, Consolidar A.F.J.P. S.A. (undergoing liquidation proceedings) filed an action for damages against the National State and the Ministry of Labor, Employment and Social Security with the court of original Federal Jurisdiction over Contentious Administrative Matters No. 4, Clerk of Court’s Office No. 7, case file No. 40,437/2010. The complaint was ratified by BBVA Francés in its capacity as majority shareholder in that Company. On July 15, 2011, Consolidar A.F.J.P. S.A. (undergoing liquidation proceedings) and BBVA Francés filed with the same court an enhanced complaint for determining the amounts claimed as damages. On March 9, 2012, the Court ordered the service of process on the National State. On November 23, 2012, the Court handed down a resolution demanding the production of evidence within a term of forty days. On May 13, 2013, the Court hearing in the case ordered that
F-40
evidence be produced. The Company is providing depositions, documentary evidence and expert witnesses’ reports. On May 28, 2013, the Company accompanied the statements and the testimony of witnesses, as the case is currently at the evidence production stage.
NOTE 16—MINORITY INTEREST IN SUBSIDIARIES
The breakdown of balances in the “Minority interest in subsidiaries” account is as follow:
NOTE 17—ACCOUNTS IDENTIFYING COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM CASH
The following are the items computed for compliance with Minimum Cash Requirements according to the regulations of the BCRA, with their corresponding balances as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:
NOTE 18—THE BANK’S DOCUMENTATION AND RECORDS – CNV RESOLUTION No. 629/14
CNV issued its General Resolution No. 629 on August 14, 2014 to introduce changes in its own rules governing the maintenance and safekeeping of corporate books, accounting records and business documentation. In this respect, it is reported that the Bank has sent the documentation that supports its operations for the periods still open to audit for safekeeping to Administradora de Archivos S.A. (AdeA), domiciled at Ruta 36 Km. 31.5 of Florencio Varela, Province of Buenos Aires.
F-41
In addition, it is put on record that a detail of the documentation delivered for safekeeping, as well as the documentation referred to in Article 5, Sub-article a.3), Section I of Chapter V of Title II of the CNV rules is available at the Bank’s registered office (Technical Rules 2013 as modified).
NOTE 19—PURCHASE OF STOCK IN VOLKSWAGEN CREDIT COMPAÑÍA FINANCIERA S.A.
On May 20, 2015, the Bank executed a Stock Purchase Agreement with Grupo Volkswagen. Pursuant to this Stock Purchase Agreement, the Bank will acquire 51% of the capital stock of Volkswagen Credit Compañía Financiera S.A., equivalent to 23,970,000 non-endorsable, registered, ordinary shares with par value $ 1 and the right to one vote per share. The transaction will be consummated after the consent by the Argentine Central Bank is received.
For the acquisition of these shares, a maximum price has been established at 53,040 which must be paid by the Bank at the closing of the transaction.
NOTE 20—RISK MANAGEMENT POLICIES
The Risk Department comprises units specializing in each class of risk (credit, financial and operational risk) that work alongside cross-sectional control units: Technical Secretariat; Reporting and Validation and Internal Control.
The following is a description of the comprehensive policies and processes for identifying, assessing, controlling and mitigating all risks: credit, financial and operational.
The Risk Department is made up by the following divisions: Retail Banking, Enterprise and Wholesale Banking and Recoveries. Within the purview of the Retail Banking and the Enterprise and Wholesale Banking divisions, there are the areas in charge of Admission, Follow-Up and Policies and Tools. In turn, the Recoveries division includes areas specializing in severity mitigation, further split into Legal actions for debt recovery, Personalized debt recovery efforts, Special Proceedings and Policies, Tools and Follow-up.
Approvals are processed by virtue of the loan-granting powers conferred upon the positions responsible for Admission and the Risk Management Committee. In addition, the commercial areas rely on a smaller number of delegated loan-granting powers based on the amount of the transaction and on the opinion yielded by the set of evaluation tools known as “SAVERF”. Any application that receives a "study/reject" opinion from any of the evaluation tools must be analyzed by the Central Admission specialists.
Any exceptions to the polices currently in force are addressed by the Risk Management Committee and/or by the Technical Committee of Local Operations.
The assessment methodology is based on internally designed scoring and rating models applied to the Retail Banking and Enterprise and Wholesale Banking portfolios management, respectively. The application of this methodology leads to the calculation of the probability of default and in addition, to a historical control over expected losses and loss given default of such losses in each portfolio. The scoring and rating tools are re-estimated periodically.
In the year 2015, Risk Wholesale , we continued with the use of the rating model introduced in 2014 to assess customers Corporate Banking and follow the same was done to measure the extent of discrimination model and thus establishing and evaluating future improvements.
During 2015, Retail Risk put in place an assessment model for the Small-to-Medium-Sized Businesses segment with connectivity to product applications and the credit authorities and limits manager. Hence, we have started to decentralize risks towards the branch network, notifying the decision made to the client, to the extent the tool retrieves an approval decision. The other decisions are still made on a centralized basis.
Regarding individuals, during this year we started to recalculate clients’ proactive scoring, adding new behavioral variables and client segmentation, which has considerably enhanced the discrimination power. The new development will be operational in 2016.
F-42
The use of new behavioral and transactional information enables us to enhance revenue predictors. These developments started in 2015 and will be operational in 2016.
Finally, during this year we have participated in the development of on-line assessment engines, driving the digital banking offering.
Financial Risk is the unit responsible for managing Market Risk (including Counterparty Risk and Valuation Room), Structural Risks (Interest Rate and Liquidity Risks), Capital Self-Assessment and Stress scenarios.
The Bank’s business model is customer-centric. The Bank’s exposure to activities for its banking book has shrunk in line with BBVA Francés’s risk appetite.
For managing market risk, the VaR (“Value at Risk”) indicator is used as it is the basic unit for measuring and managing this risk in so far as it estimates the maximum expected loss with a 99% confidence level that can be seen in the market positions of a portfolio given a one-day time horizon. The volatility in risk factors used by the model is calculated using a historical 2-year window.
The Market Risk model is validated at regular intervals through Back-testing sessions (with a 99% confidence interval and a 250-day time horizon) that seeks to determine the quality and accuracy of the model used to estimate Value at Risk.
The structure of Market Risk limits establishes patterns of limits, alert and sub-limits in terms of Economic Capital (CeR, as internally known) and VaR and stress and stop loss.
The Market Risk unit manages the counterparty risk. The model estimation of credit risk in derivatives to determine not only the current exposure of each of the partners, but also the possible future development to changes in the different market variables.
Liquidity and Funding Risk
The main basic metrics used to control liquidity risk and financing include:
As part of the liquidity and financing risk control and monitoring process, below is a detail of the most relevant metrics:
F-43
Interest-rate risk
Balance sheet interest-rate risk management seeks to maintain BBVA Francés' exposure at levels in harmony with the risk appetite validated by the Bank in the event of changes in market interest rates.
Below are some of the monitoring indicators inherent to this risk
From the standpoint of structural interest rate risk, the calculation of economic capital seeks to quantify the losses that could be incurred in the event of adverse variations in interest rates in highly unlikely extreme scenarios. Specifically calculated is the maximum loss that economic value could sustain, given a 99% interval of confidence.
Financial margin sensitivity measures changes in accruals expected for a given period (12 months) in the event of 100 basis point shifts in the curve of interest rates. Financial margin sensitivity is calculated by simulating margins, both in the event of a scenario of movements in the curve of interest rates and in the event of an actual situation, with sensitivity being the difference between the two margins calculated.
Stress Testing
Stress tests are understood to refer to the assessment of a financial position in the face of a severely adverse though possible scenario.
In this respect, stress tests are divided as per their scope of application into individual and comprehensive. Individual stress tests are aimed at measuring the impact of an adverse scenario at the individual level by risk type. Comprehensive stress tests seek to quantify impacts at the aggregate level of adverse scenarios in terms of the Balance sheet, the Income statement, any changes in cash flows and any capital requirements associated to a given projected stress situation.
BBVA Francés has a Stress Testing program in place which comprises comprehensive testing, as well as individual stress tests periodically conducted on the following risks:
F-44
A financial institution’s economic capital is that required to cover unexpected losses stemming from the exposures to risk that may affect the Bank.
The risk profile of BBVA Francés focuses on those risks which, given their relevance, are apt to affect current or future solvency. Therefore, economic capital estimates include the following risks:
Contingency planning
BBVA Francés’ contingency plans are intended to outline the strategy to address emergency situations, setting forth policies and procedures to manage a range of potential stress scenarios and clearly defining responsibilities for each situation. The Entity has contingency plans in place to address the following risks:
The Risk Departament, in accordance with international standards and the Argentine Central Bank’s requirements established by the BCRA, the area on the Validation and Internal Control/Operational Risk Management at the Country level in charge of ensuring an updated control environment that is consistent and sufficient in all of the Bank’s units.
Internal validation is the area responsible for ensuring that internal risk models of the BBVA Francés are suitable for use in risk management.
Regarding the Internal Control and Operational Risk, which is based on a scheme Control Specialist and Operational Risk Managers , called GROs, in the areas of business.
The Internal Control and Operational Risk Model identifies the organization’s operational procedures and all the operational risks to which they are exposed. This methodology appraises each one of these risks, which are then assigned a priority and their criticality is then established for them to be managed for purposes of mitigation, if applicable.
The Technical Secretariat and Reporting area is responsible for the procedures that control the operating ratios associated to credit risk grading and diversification, provisioning, determination of risk quotas by industry segment and by type of funding.
F-45
The area has a Reporting unit that performs the function of generating reporting for Risk Management in order to decision-making in compliance with internal credit policies and control bodies , reviewing processes and proposing alternatives.
NOTE 21—TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES
The balances as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 for transactions performed with parents and affiliates are as follows:
Additionally loans were granted to Key Management Personnel by 17,896 and 16,718 as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
The net income as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, for transactions performed with parents, subsidiaries and affiliates are as follows:
Net income (1)
NOTE 22—TRANSPARENT CORPORATE GOVERNANCE POLICY
The By-laws of BBVA Francés prescribe that the Bank shall be managed by a Board of Directors made up by a minimum number of three and a maximum number of nine directors, as established by the Ordinary General Shareholders’ Meeting when appropriate. Directors shall serve on the Board for three-year terms and they may be re-elected (the “Board of Directors”). The Bank’s Shareholders’ Meeting may designate alternate directors in an equal or lower number. The Board of Directors must meet at least once a month.
The proposed board membership shall be subject to a previous evaluation by the Nominations and Remunerations Committee.
F-46
The table below indicates the names of the members of our Board of Directors, their present position in the company and their business background.
Business experience:Regular Director of Rombo Compañía Financiera S.A, Director.; Director, Credilogros Compañía Financiera S.A.; Credit Manager, Banco del Interior y Buenos Aires; Business Manager, Corporación Metropolitana de Finanzas; Financial Manager, BBVA Francés; Wholesale Banking Director, BBVA Francés, Retail Banking Director, BBVA Francés¸ Retail Banking Director, BBVA Francés; Alternate Director, Central Puerto S.A.; Regular Director, Sociedad Argentina de Energía S.A.; Alternate Director , HidroNeuquén S.A.; Regular Director, RPM Gas S.A. and Alternate Director, RPU Agropecuaria S.A., Alternate Director, Gasinvest S.A.; Regular Director, RPE Distribucion S.A.; Vice-president, PB Distribucion S.A.
Jorge Carlos Bledel is an independent director in the terms of General Resolution No. 622/13 (as per its new wording dating back to 2013).
Vice Chairman 1°
Business experience: Retail Banking Director, BBVA Francés; Marketing Director for Spain and Portugal, BBVA.
José Manuel Tamayo Pérez meets the independence criteria to be considered as an independent director in the terms of General Resolution No. 622/13 (as per its new wording dating back to 2013).
Vice Chairman 2°
Business experience: Vice-president of Psa Finance Argentina Cia. Financiera S.A.; Vice-president at the Board of Directors of Fundación Banco Francés; Regular Director of Rombo Compañía Financiera S.A.; Corporate Assistant Manager, BBVA Francés; Wholesale Banking Assistant Manager, BBVA Francés; Asset Management Director, BBVA Francés and Financial Director, BBVA Francés.
Marcelo Gustavo Canestri is an independent director in the terms of General Resolution No. 622/13 (as per its new wording dating back to 2013).
Regular Director
Business experience:Executive Chairman, Asociación de Bancos de la Argentina ABA; Regular Director, Seguros de Depósitos S.A. SEDESA; Regular Director, Federación Latinoamericana de Bancos Felaban; Regular Director, Banco Sudameris S.A.; Regular Director, Banco Central de la República Argentina; Planning Assistant Manager and Deputy General Manager, Banco de Crédito Argentino S.A.; Chief Economist – Head of Department, Banco Central de la República Argentina.
Mario Vicens is an independent director in the terms of General Resolution No. 622/13 (as per its new wording dating back to 2013).
Business experience:Executive member of the Committee of Financial Services, , Pistrelli Díaz y Asoc. for twenty years. Partner in charge of the Financial Services Division in Argentina and Latin America, and member of the Financial Services Executive Committee at worldwide. Independent director of Zurich Argentina Compañía de Seguros and Zurich Compañía de Reaseguros.
Oscar Miguel Castro is an independent director in the terms of General Resolution No. 622/13 (as per its new wording dating back to 2013).
Luis Bernardo Juango Fitero
Business experience: President, BBVA S.A. Colombia; Regional Director, BBVA.
Luis Bernardo Juango Fitero is an independent director in the terms of General Resolution No. 622/13 (as per its new wording dating back to 2013).
On January 11, 2016 and effective as from such date, BBVA Francés’ Board of Directors accepted the resignation of Mr. Martín Zarich as Alternate Director.
F-47
Also on January 11, 2016, Mr. Martín Zarich took over as BBVA Francés’ General Manager, following the Argentine Central Bank’s authorization to such end granted through Resolution No. 9 dated January 7, 2016.
Senior Management is made up by the General Manager and by those executive officers who have decision-making powers and who report directly to the General Manager.
The officers in Senior Management positions must have the skills and experience required by the financial industry to run the business with which they are entrusted and to oversee as appropriate the personnel in the various areas.
The main members of Senior Management make up the Management Committee. The Committee is chaired by the Executive Director or General Manager.
Prospective Management Committee members shall first be evaluated by the Nominations and Remunerations Committee for subsequent consideration by the Board.
Powers
The Management Committee shall have the following powers, and, when appropriate, it shall be required to submit matters to consideration by the Board for final decision.
The following table identifies the members of the Management Committee and provides certain details about their business experience. The highest-ranking officers are designated for unlimited periods.
F-48
Martín
Ezequiel Zarich (*)
Finance Area – Technology and Operations, BBVA; Director of the Department of Assets and Liabilities Management for Latin America, BBVA; Director of the Investment Banking Comptroller’s Office (Treasury, Capital Markets, Intermediation, Corporate, Structured Financing), BBVA; Corporate Director, BBVA; Director of the Treasury, Capital Markets and International Network area, BEX Argentaria BBVA; Director of the Market Risk Audit Unit, BEX Argentaria BBVA; Director of Central Services Audit, BEX; Director of Planning, Intervention and Control, SERFINBEX; Director, BEX Argentaria BBVA; Team Leader at Arthur Andersen Auditores S.A.
Director,
Digital Banking & Transformation
Director, Human Resources and Services
Director of Technology and Operations, BBVA; Coordinator, Systems & Organizations, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro; Systems Coordinator, Banco Galicia; System Organization and Development Manager, Banco de Crédito Argentino; Design and Development Manager, BBVA Francés; Media Director, BBVA Francés; Director of Design and Development for the Americas, BBVA; Business Partner for the Americas, BBVA.
Carlos Elizalde
Director, Corporate & Investment Banking
Regional Manager, Citibank Branch; Regional Manager of Local Branches, Banco de Crédito Argentino; General Manager, Easy-Bank (BBVA Francés); General Manager and Vicepresident, BBVA Banco Uruguay; Companies Banking Manager, BBVA Francés.
Director of Design and Development – Technology and Operations, BBVA; Information Technology Manager - Media, BBVA; Media Director, BBVA Uruguay; Media Planning and Information Security Manager, BBVA Francés; Media Information Security Manager, Banco de Crédito Argentino.
Director, Risks
Retail Banking Director for South America, BBVA; Director of Wholesale Banking for South America, BBVA; Retail Risk Manager, BBVA Francés, Wholesale and Enterprise Risk Manager, BBVA Francés, Admission and Follow-up Manager, BBVA Francés, Monitoring and Operation Risk Manager, BBVA Francés, Director of Rombo Compañía Financiera S.A., Director of PSA Finance Argentina Compañía Financiera S.A., Portfolio Monitoring Manager, Banco de Crédito Argentino. Investment Banking Senior Officer.
Retail Product Manager, BBVA Francés; Manager of Payment Services and Retail, BBVA Francés; Manager of Strategic Alliances and Products, BBVA Francés; Marketing Manager, BBVA Francés; Commercial Banking Advisor Manager, BBVA Francés; Area Manager, BBVA Francés; Branch Manager at Pilar, San Nicolás and Rosario, BBVA Francés.
*On January 11, 2016,
(*)Martín Zarich took over as BBVA Francés’ General Manager, following the Argentine Central Bank’s authorization to such end granted through Resolution No. 9 dated January 7, 2016. Ricardo Moreno was the incumbent General Manager until such date.
Major Shareholders
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our ordinary shares as of December 31, 2015, by each person who, to our knowledge, owns beneficially more than 5% of our ordinary shares. These persons do not have different voting rights.
F-49
The Audit Committee (CNV / SEC ) BBVA Banco Frances is a collegiate body which is composed mostly of independent directors according to the criteria established in the regulations of the CNV , with a mandate to assist the Board in evaluating the role and independence of the external auditor and the exercise of the function of internal control of the Bank. The Audit Committee has internal rules and regulations in place that govern its purpose, organization and functions and that were approved at the General Ordinary and Special Shareholder’s meeting held on April 22, 2004. The Audit Committee also has a Recording Secretary who also serves as Board of Director’s Secretary.
The Audit Committee is comprised by three (3) regular members of the Board of Directors to be appointed by the board by a simple majority of votes. The Board may also appoint an Alternate Member.
The directors comprising the Audit Committee shall have knowledge on business, financial or accounting issues.
F-50
Upon the resignation, removal, death or incapacity of any member of the Audit Committee, the designated Alternate Member shall replace the outgoing regular member until the following Annual Ordinary Shareholder’s Meeting. The alternate member shall also have knowledge on business, financial or accounting issues and its incorporation shall not affect the majority of independent members that shall comprise the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee also meets the specifications of the Sarbanes Oxley Act.
Its main functions are:
BBVA Francés’ Nominations and Remunerations Committee is a non-executive body whose purpose consists in assisting the Board on matters concerning the Bank’s remuneration and benefit policies. Furthermore, the Nominations and Remunerations Committee is the body entrusted with the establishment of the standards and procedures governing the recruitment and training of Board members, Executive and other officers, and top-ranked personnel.
Structure:
BBVA Francés’ Nominations and Remunerations Committee shall be formed by three Executive Directors any largely independent, to be designated by the Board in the same manner as the President and such individuals with executive duties as determined by the Board of Directors. The Committee shall be presided over by an Independent Director.
Each member of the Appointment and Compensation Committee shall prove sufficient knowledge on and experience in HR, compensation policies and labor risk management.
Functions:
The Appointment and Compensation Committee shall perform the following functions:
F-51
F-52
Organization and Operation Rules:
The Appointment and Compensation Committee shall meet as frequently as deemed necessary to perform its functions and, at least, twice per year. Meetings shall be indistinctly convened by the President or other member.
The Committee may convene individuals within the Bank that perform tasks related to the Committee’s functions, and may seek such external advice, through the Board of Directors, as deemed necessary to form an opinion on the matters within its competence.
The President of the Committee shall be available at the Shareholder’s meeting approving the Board of Directors’ compensation to explain the Bank’s policies.
According to the Argentine Central Bank’s regulations, the Internal Audit Committee de BBVA Banco Francés is composed of the officials determined the board must integrate at least the same, have two members and at least one member must be an independent director. The operation of this committee shall be governed by the rules of the B.C.R.A. and by internal regulations..
The Board must use the conclusions of the internal audit timely and efficaciously and foster the internal auditor’s independence vis-à-vis the areas and processes controlled by said audit.
This Committee is made up by: (i) BBVA Francés’s Regular Director in his capacity as Regulatory Compliance Officer; (ii) Highest-ranking officer in the field of Regulatory Compliance; (iii) one Regular Director and (iv) the Officer responsible for the Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing.
Specifically, this Committee shall be in charge of:
This Committee is made up by a member of the Board, the Director Systems and Operations, the Technology and Operation Manager, the Systems Manager and the Informational Assets Administration, Security and Safety Manager.
F-53
This Committee is comprised by an Independent Director, the Director of the Financial and Planning Area, the Risk Director, the Legal Services Director, the Manager of the Legal Services Institutional Area, the Audit Director, the Accounting and Intervention Manager, the Planning and Efficiency Manager and an Officer of Investor Relations and Analyst of Investor Relations.
The main functions of the Disclosure Committee are to:
A quorum is constituted with the absolute majority of the Committee’s members and decisions are made by a majority of the present members. Such individuals having expertise on the issues to be discussed at the meetings may attend them as guests, and may sign the minutes; provided, however, that the presence of such individuals shall not be taken into account for the meeting quorum and required majorities.
This Committee is made up by three Regular Directors, the Executive Director or General Manager, the Assistant Director of Regulatory Compliance, the Commercial Banking Director, the Finance and Planning Director and the Assistant Director of Legal services. The minutes and other housekeeping issues associated to this committee shall be the responsibility of the Institutional Area of Legal Services.
F-54
The Committee shall hold monthly meetings and shall be presided over by the President, who shall be elected among Regular Directors at the Committee’s first meeting. The Committee shall also have a Secretary in charge of establishing the agenda items, and preparing the minutes for each issue discussed, along with the decisions made in each case. In the absence of the President, meetings shall be presided over by the Executive Director or General Manager.
The quorum is constituted with the absolute majority of the Committee’s members and decisions are made by a majority of the present members.
This committee is the Entity’s uttermost risk management collegiate body. It is comprised by the General Manager, Risk Director, Validation and Internal Control Deputy Manager, Retail Risk Manager, Enterprise and Wholesale Risk Manager (as regular members); the Financial Risk Manager and the Recovery Manager (as optional attendants or to deal with specific matters); and the Head of the Technical and Reporting Secretariat, Head of the Area of the issue under discussion and Speaker (specific attendants).
The Committee’s main functions are the following:
F-55
The Committee shall be presided over by the President (General Manager) and shall have a Secretary (Head of the Technical and Reporting Secretariat) who, among other things, shall establish the agenda items and prepare the minutes for each issue discussed, along with the decisions made in each case. The Committee shall meet twice per week. If an urgent meeting is warranted, such meeting shall be convened on an extraordinary basis.
This Committee is comprised by the Risk Director, Validation and Internal Control Deputy Manager, Retail Risk Manager, Enterprise and Wholesale Risk Manager (as regular members); the Financial Risk Manager and the Recovery Manager (as optional attendants or to deal with specific matters); and the Head of the Technical and Reporting Secretariat, Head of the Area of the issue under discussion and Speaker (specific attendants).
This Committee reviews operations for up to US$40,000,000 and its main functions are the following:
The Committee’s meetings shall be presided over by the President (Risk Director), with the attendance of a Secretary (Head of the Technical and Reporting Secretariat) who, among other things, shall establish the agenda items and prepare the minutes.
Decisions shall be made unanimously or by absolute majority with the President’s favorable vote.
The quorum is constituted with the presence of at least two regular members (including the attendants called for to deal with specific matters) and two specific attendants.
The Committee shall meet on a weekly basis.
F-56
This Committee is comprised by the Executive Director as President, members of the Management Committee as Regular Members, and the Committee´s Secretariat in charge of the Audit Director.
Its main functions are the following:
Committee shall hold ordinary and special meetings. Ordinary meetings shall be held every four months, following the required call by the Secretary. Special meetings shall be held when convened by the Secretary or at the request of one or more members of the Committee, when special circumstances so warrant.
F-57
BBVA Francés operates a network of 251 branches distributed as follows: Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, 82 branches; Greater Buenos Aires, 53 branches, with the remaining 116 branches being situated in the Argentine provinces.
The most relevant business lines are: Retail Banking, whose strategy relies on building a comprehensive relationship with customers and strengthening the credit card segment; Enterprise Banking, which aims at aiding companies through both short- and long-term financing and Corporate & Investment Banking, an area concerned with Foreign Trade transactions as much as with advice in mergers and acquisitions and in capital market transactions.
BBVA Francés has a policy in place, namely, the application of a compensation system capable of attracting and retaining the persons most adequate to each position, according to the following principles:
The remuneration system includes all other payments collected by employees as consideration for their contributions to the organization in terms of time, position and results and it is made up by the fixed remuneration system and the variable remuneration system.
For the observance of these principles, the Bank has instruments embedded in the remuneration processes that are detailed below:
F-58
Besides, BBVA Francés uses performance assessments as a key tool to remunerate the effort and the results of each employee. At the end of each fiscal year, each head of area evaluates the objectives of their employees in order to obtain the individual performance assessment of performance for the year. Within it, we can distinguish four types of objectives: Quantitative, Customer-related, Tactical and Other.
The outcome of the assessments reflects the levels contributed by each team member and it is on this basis that the right to collect the pre-defined incentives is defined.
“Cataloguing” is the name ascribed in the Bank to the process whereby the employee in charge makes a global assessment of each one of his/her reportees in the performance of their current functions and whose results are used for the enforcement of certain Human Resources policies.
“Projection”, in turn, is the process whereby the employee in charge makes a global assessment of each one of his/her reportees about their capabilities to discharge higher ranking functions inside the Bank. This valuation must be based on the experience, knowledge, skills and commitment of the employees.
Each employee has access to variable remuneration associated to his/her position and to the results obtained in the performance assessment. The aim is to incentivize and reward the attainment of results. The models currently in force are:
Besides, starting in 2012, the Bank has incorporated a new system to calculate and pay the annual variable bonus for a given group of executives whose professional activities have a material impact on the Bank’s risk profile.
This group’s executives receive, at least, 50% of the annual variable bonus for each fiscal year in shares. The payment, both in cash and in shares is distributed as follows: 60% of the bonus is paid during the first quarter of the year and the remaining 40% is distributed in deferred thirds for up to 3 years as from the first date of payment of the variable bonus.
The shares delivered to this group of employees that are part of their annual variable bonus for the year are of restricted availability during the 6 months immediately following. The restricted availability regime applies to the
F-59
net amount of the shares, that is, discounting the part necessary for the employee to pay the taxes levied on the shares received. Such restricted availability regime applicable to shares applies equally in the events of termination of the labor relationship between the employee or executive with BBVA Francés for any reason other than death and certified total labor disability in all degrees. At the expiration of the period of restricted availability, this group of BBVA Francés employees are free to transfer their shares as they see fit.
Besides attaining the objectives laid down for such incentive, beneficiaries must remain active in the Bank as of the date of calculation and settlement, must have generated the right to collect their ordinary variable bonus for that year and they must be free from penalties for serious breaches of the Code of Conduct and other internal regulations.
The Bank has a Code of Conduct that binds all of BBVA Francés’ employees and officers.
The Code of Conduct defines the ethical behavior that the Board of BBVA Francés considers applicable to the businesses and activities conducted by BBVA Francés and the Group companies in Argentina, builds on their foundations and lays down the guidelines required for corporate integrity to be outwardly expressed in (i) relationships with clients, employees and officers, suppliers and third parties; (ii) acting in the various markets as issuers or operators; (iii) individual actions by employees and officers; and (iv) establishing specific bodies and functions endowed with the responsibility for enforcing the Code and fostering the actions necessary to effectively safeguard corporate integrity as a whole.
On December 16, 2014, the Board of Directors approved the most recent version of the Rules for Preventing and Handling Conflicts of Interest at BBVA Francés and other affiliates in Argentina.
The Rule contains the following principal guidelines: (i) it determines the scope of application; (ii) it identifies conflicts of interest; (iii) it establishes the measures for preventing and handling conflicts of interest; and (iv) it provides a procedure for conflict resolution.
In addition, Section 12 “Standards for discharging directorship duties” of the Code of Corporate Governance regulates, among other matters, transactions between Directors and the Bank or other group companies.
Basically, it mandates that any director involved shall not be in attendance when the relevant corporate bodies in which he is a member are in session to discuss the matters in which he or she might have a direct or indirect interest or which might affect persons related to him or her in the terms defined by the laws.
It also prescribes that the director involved shall be enjoined from entering, either directly or indirectly, into personal, professional or commercial transactions with the Bank or companies in its group, unless these transactions are subject to a procurement process that ensures transparency, with competing bids and in arm’s length conditions.
NOTE 23—IFRS CONVERGENCE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
As of the date of issuance of these financial statements, the Bank was in the process of implementing the plan geared to convergence with the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as set forth in the Argentine Central Bank's Communication "A” 5541 and supplementary rules in this respect, which will be effective as from the financial statements for the fiscal years beginning on January 1, 2018. On March 17, 2015, the Entity’s Board of Directors approved the above-mentioned Plan, which was filed with the Argentine Central Bank on March 30, 2015. Moreover, the Bank’s Board of Directors has taken note of the latest report related to the progress made during its meeting in December, 2015.
F-60
On March 31, 2016 the Bank submitted to the Argentine Central Bank, in accordance with the guidelines established by Communication “A” 5844 and supplemented by the Central Bank, the adjustment items required for the reconciliation of its assets and liabilities with those that would result from applying Central Bank IFRS.
NOTE 24—OTHER REQUIRED DISCLOSURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SEC’S REQUIREMENTS
In accordance with BCRA and foreign central banks’ regulations, the Bank is required to maintain daily average minimum cash balances for each month in cash, in its account with the BCRA. The required daily averages calculated for the month ending on each balance sheet date are as follows:
The book value and fair value of instruments issued by the BCRA at amortized cost at December 31, 2015 and 2014 were as follows:
The amortized cost and the fair value of instruments issued by the BCRA at amortized cost under BCRA’s rules at December 31, 2015, by contractual maturity, were as follows:
A description of certain categories of loans on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets is as follows:
To governmental sector: loans to public sector, excluding public financial institutions.
To the financial sector: loans to local financial institutions.
To the non-financial private sector and residents abroad: loans given to the private sector (excluding local financial institutions) and residents abroad from Argentina. Include the following types of lending:
F-61
Under BCRA’s rules, the Bank must disclose the type of collateral pledged on loans to non-financial private sector and residents abroad. The classification of the loan portfolio in this regard is as follows:
Commercial loans: encompasses all financing facilities, other than those not reaching an amount equivalent to 2,500 at December 31, 2015 and 2014, with or without preferred guarantees.
Consumer loans: encompasses all financing facilities related to consumption (whether personal, professional or family consumption, loans for purchasing of consumer goods and financing credit cards) or housing loans (for buying, building or refurbishing) and financing (credits and guarantees) of a commercial nature up to an amount equivalent to 2,500 at December 31, 2015 and 2014, with or without preferred guarantees.
“Self - liquidating preferred guarantees” consist mainly of cash guarantees, gold guarantees, warrants over primary products and other forms of collateral of self-liquidation.
“Other preferred guarantees” consist, in general, of real estate mortgages and other forms of collateral pledged to secure the loan amount. The entire principal amount of loan is included under the heading “preferred guarantees” regardless of the current market value of the collateral.
“Without preferred guarantees” consist, in general, of unsecured third-party guarantees.
F-62
The Bank also tracks its loan portfolio by industry segment. At December 31, 2015 and 2014, the following industry segments represented the loan concentrations:
Substantially most of Bank’s operations, property and customers are located in Argentina. Therefore, the performance of Bank’s loan portfolio, financial condition and the results of its operations depend primarily on the macroeconomic and political conditions prevailing in Argentina.
During 2015 certain “related-parties” of the Bank were loan customers of the Bank. As defined under BCRA’s rules, related-parties include the associated companies in which the Bank has some sort of important influence (as stated by said rules) and related persons such as any director or member of the Supervisory Committee of the Bank within the previous three years, senior management of the Bank, members of the immediate families of any such persons, and companies with which they are associated. The historical activity in principal amounts of loans to related-parties during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:
Total loans outstanding to these related parties at December 31, 2015 and 2014 including accrued interest, amounted to 986,306 and 755,884, respectively. Such loans are made in the ordinary course of business at normal credit terms,
F-63
including interest rate and collateral requirements, and, in the opinion of management, do not represent more than normal credit risk.
At December 31, 2015 and 2014, approximately 82,889 and 58,146 or 0.14% and 0.14% of the Bank’s portfolio, respectively, consisted of loans to foreign borrowers.
Certain loan customers of the Bank are under court order or have entered into agreements with the Bank to satisfy their debt on basis different from the original loan terms. The Bank eliminates any differences between the principal and accrued interest due under the original loan and the new loan amount through a charge to the allowance for loan losses at the time of the restructuring.
At December 31, 2015 and 2014, non-performing loans amounted to 370,000 and 418,283, respectively. Past due loans included in the abovementioned amounts reach to 267,954 and 319,511 at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
The activity in the allowance for loan losses for the fiscal years presented is as follows:
The composition of other banking receivables by type of guarantee is as follows:
The Bank enters into spot, forward, repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements, to buy or sell foreign currency (principally U.S. dollars) and Government securities. The Bank recognizes the cash, currency or security amount to be exchanged in the future as a receivable and payable, at the initial transaction date.
F-64
The assets and corresponding liabilities related to such transactions are as follows:
The major categories of the Bank’s premises and equipment, and accumulated depreciation related thereto are presented in the following table:
Depreciation expense was 199,367, 139,236 and 100,766 at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Other assets consisted of the following at December 31, 2015 and 2014:
F-65
Organization and development expenses
The breakdown of organization and development account as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, is as follows:
The 2015 and 2014’s variations in intangible asset accounts were as follows:
The Bank borrows funds under various credit facilities obtained from the BCRA for specific purposes, as follows:
At December 31, 2015 and 2014, accrued interests and other differences included on the above liabilities amounted to 355 and 538, respectively.
Maturities of the long-term liabilities in the table above for each of the following fiscal years are as follows:
The Bank borrows funds under different credit arrangements from local and foreign banks and international lending agencies, as follows:
F-66
Accrued interests included on the above liabilities are 78,636 and 22,870, at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and are included in the “Interest and listed-price differences accrued payable” account in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The funds mentioned under the caption “Long-term liabilities: Other lines of credit from local and foreign banks” are applied mainly to loans to companies involved in foreign trade transactions.
The balances of assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency are as follows:
Under BCRA’s regulations, the Bank is required to maintain individual and consolidated minimum levels of equity capital (“minimum capital”). At December 31, 2015 and 2014 the consolidated minimum capital is based upon risk-weighted assets and also considers operational risk and market risk. The required consolidated minimum capital and the consolidated Bank’s capital calculated under the BCRA’s regulations are as follows:
F-67
Excess of actual Minimum Capital over Required Minimum Capital (1)
Earnings per share for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, were computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of Ordinary Shares outstanding during each fiscal year.
The Bank does not maintain pension plans for its employees; nevertheless, since 2005 and up to 2014 the BBVA Francés gave to certain executives, with a role at corporate level, the possibility to access into defined contribution pension plan that it is subject to ASC 962-10, Plan Accounting-Defined Contribution Pension Plans: Overall. This pension plan consisted in a percentage calculated over determinate recompensing concepts. At December 31, 2014 and 2013 the Bank has been accruing 1,516 and 2,339 in “Operating Expenses - Payroll expenses”, respectively. This concept has not had impact under U.S. GAAP. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, the Bank did not pay any amount as contribution pension plans.
Additionally, following a proposal from the Appointments and Salaries Committee the Board of Directors of BBVA Francés, approved incentive plan which included the delivery of BBVA shares to certain executives. At December 31, 2015 and 2015 the Bank recognized 21,249 and 12,956, respectively, for this concept. It had not impact under U.S. GAAP.
In addition, the Bank is obligated to pay employer contributions to the Argentine Integrated Social Security System, determined on the basis of total monthly payroll. These expenses aggregated 475,637, 208,222 and 201,306 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and are included in the “Operating Expenses—Payroll expenses” account in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
ASC 280-10, Segment Reporting: Overall requires that a public business enterprise report financial and descriptive information about its reportable operating segments. Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance. Generally, financial information is required to be reported on the basis that it is used internally for evaluating segment performance and deciding how to allocate resources to segments.
The Bank is mainly concentrated on the financial sector, especially through its activities related to banking/financial, pension fund manager and insurance.
The following information shows total assets, financial income, service charge income and other income, total income, financial expenses, allowances for doubtful loans, operating expenses, other expenses, total expenses, loss / gain on minority interest in subsidiaries and total net income for each of the business segment identified by the Bank’s management.
F-68
operations (5)
Francés S.A.(4)
F-69
The Bank’s reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products and services. They are managed separately because each segment appeals to different markets and, accordingly, requires different technology and marketing strategies.
The Pension Fund Manager segment has been affected by the reform of the integrated retirement and pension system, as mentioned in Note 15.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The Bank evaluates performance based on profit or loss from operations before income taxes not including non-recurring gains or losses.
The Bank does not have a single external private customer from whom it derives 10 percent or more of its revenues and operates in one geographical area. Nevertheless, the Bank has significant exposure to the Argentine Federal Government in form of instruments issued by the BCRA, other debt obligations and Federal Government secured loans. For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 the Bank recorded net income from government securities for 3,505,177, 1,661,035 and 357,995, respectively. In addition, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the Bank recorded, under BCRA rules, income from Federal Government secured loans (Decree No. 1387/01), including CER accrual for 15,680, 16,454 and 8,840, respectively.
The presentation of Consolidated Financial Statements according to BCRA’s rules differs significantly from the format required by the US. Securities and Exchange Commission (US SEC) under Rules 9-03 and 9-04 of Regulation S-X (“Article 9”). These Consolidated Financial Statements were prepared using the measurement methods prescribed by the BCRA, but in accordance with the presentation requirements of the US SEC.
The Consolidated Statements of Operations presented below discloses the categories required by Article 9:
F-70
(1)Stated in pesos.
Certain categories of income and expense maintained by the Bank have been presented in the above Article 9 Consolidated Statement of Operations in a manner which warrants further discussion:
- “Foreign currency gain, net”: this item relates primarily to the differences in exchange rates on the Bank’s investments, loans and deposits denominated in foreign currency. The Bank does not maintain foreign currency gains or losses in separate categories of assets and liabilities, respectively, and, therefore, since such gains or losses cannot be separately identified by type of activity.
BCRA’s rules also required certain classifications of assets and liabilities which are different from those required by Article 9. The following balance sheets depict the Bank’s Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2015 and 2014 as if the Bank followed the balance sheets disclosure requirements under Article 9:
F-71
The following balance sheets depict the Bank’s Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2015 and 2014 from discontinued operations as if the Bank followed the balance sheets disclosure requirements under Article 9:
F-72
The Bank enters into various transactions involving off-balance-sheet financial instruments. These instruments could be used to meet the risk management, trading and financing needs of clients or for the Bank’s proprietary trading and asset and liability management purposes, and could be subject to varying degrees of credit and market risk. Credit risk and market risk associated with on- and off-balance-sheet financial instruments are monitored on an aggregate basis.
The Bank uses the same credit policies in determining whether to enter or extend call and put option contracts, commitments, conditional obligations and guarantees as it does for granting loans. In the opinion of management, the Bank’s outstanding off-balance-sheet items do not represent unusual credit risk.
In the normal course of its business, the Bank enters into a variety transactions principally in the foreign exchange and stock markets. The majority of the counterparties in the derivative transactions are banks and other financial and local institutions.
These instruments include:
Forward transactions are effected by the Bank in order to comply with the limits set forth by the BCRA in relation to the technical ratio of the Net Global Position in foreign currency and to reduce fluctuations risks in the rates of exchange. However, such transactions do not qualify as foreign exchange hedge in terms of ASC 815-20, Derivatives and Hedging: Hedging-General.
Pursuant to BCRA’s regulations, future and forward transactions must be recorded under “Other Receivables from Financial Transactions” and “Other Liabilities from Financial Transactions” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and they have been valued as mentioned in Notes 3.4.8. and 3.4.9. In addition, future and forward transactions without delivery of underlying asset and the interest rate swaps have been valued as mentioned in Note 3.4.14. and have been registered into Memorandum Accounts’ caption.
The notional contractual amount of these instruments represents the volume of outstanding transactions and does not represent the potential gain or loss associated with the market or credit risk of such transactions. The market risk of derivatives arises from the potential for changes in value due to fluctuations in market prices. The Bank reduces its exposure to market risk, if necessary, by entering into offsetting transactions in accordance with the global policy of hedging defined by BBVA for its subsidiaries. The credit risk of derivatives arises from the potential of a counterparty defaulting on its contractual obligations. The effect of such a default varies as the market value of derivative contracts changes. Credit exposure exists at a particular point in time when a derivative has a positive market value. The Bank attempts to limit its credit risk by dealing with creditworthy counterparties and obtaining collateral where appropriate. At December 31, 2015 and 2014 the Bank entered into forward contracts and interest rate swaps for trading purposes. The notional amount of outstanding forward contracts as of the mentioned dates, are included in Note 24.6. The following table shows at December 31, 2015 and 2014 the notional value forward transactions and SWAP that fall within trading classification:
F-73
The Bank’s exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by counterparties to commitments to extend credit, guarantees granted and foreign trade acceptances is represented by the contractual notional amount of those investments.
A summary of credit exposure related to these items is shown below (*):
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer at a future date, subject to compliance with contractual terms. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require the payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent actual future cash requirements for the Bank. The Bank evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis.
Foreign trade acceptances represent Bank customers’ liabilities on outstanding drafts or bills of exchange that have been accepted by the Bank and the Bank’s liability to remit payment upon the presentation of the accepted drafts or bills of exchange.
The credit risk involved in foreign trade acceptances and guarantees granted is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. In order to grant guarantees to its customers, the Bank may require counter guarantees. Such financial instruments are classified, by type of guarantee, as follows:
The Bank accounts for checks against it and other banks, as well as other items in process of collection, such as notes, bills and miscellaneous items, in memorandum accounts until such time as the related item clears or is accepted. In the opinion of management, no significant risk of loss exists on these clearing transactions. The amounts of clearing items in process are as follows:
F-74
See Note 10.
NOTE 25—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE ARGENTINE CENTRAL BANK RULES AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
The following is a description of the significant differences between BCRA’s rules followed in the preparation of the Bank’s Consolidated Financial Statements and those applicable in the United States under generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). References below to “ASC” are to Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to the BCRA’s rules, the Bank’s Consolidated Financial Statements recognize the effects of inflation until August 31, 1995 and since January 1, 2002 to February 28, 2003, as mentioned in Note 3.2. As allowed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission under item 18 of Form 20-F, the effect of inflation accounting under BCRA’s rules has not been reversed in the reconciliation to U.S. GAAP.
As explained in Note 5.1., under BCRA´s rules, the Bank determined the charge for income tax applying the effective rate to taxable income estimated for each year considering the effect of temporary differences between book and taxable income. The criterion is in accordance with U.S. GAAP, based on ASC 740-10, Income Taxes: Overall.
Under ASC 740-10, Income Taxes: Overall, deferred tax assets or liabilities are recorded for temporary differences between the financial and tax basis of assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is provided for the deferred tax assets to the extent that it is more likely than not that they will not be realized.
The following table accounts for the difference between the actual tax provision and the amounts obtained by applying the statutory income tax rate in Argentina to income before income tax in accordance with US. GAAP:
The “Tax exempt income” adjustment noted above principally relates to gains generated by equity investments, which were not subject to income tax (31,070, 48,989 and 39,910 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively), to the exemption established during the public debt swap transaction, by which the income generated by the Federal Government secured loans received were exempt in the income tax (514, 420 and 370 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively) and gains generated in Tierra del Fuego province, which were not subject to income tax (39,887, 33,812 and 37,002 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively).
“Other, net” includes other net effects, tax exempt income and non-deductible items.
The principal components of “Other, net” are explained in the table below:
F-75
As mentioned in Note 5.2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, tax on minimum presumed income (“TOMPI”) is a complementary tax to the income tax. The Bank’s tax obligation for each year will coincide with the highest of two taxes, the BCRA income tax and TOMPI. However, if TOMPI exceeds the income tax in a given year, the excess thereof may be computed as a payment on account of any income tax in excess of TOMPI that may occur in any of the following ten years. Since TOMPI is calculated on different basis than income tax (under tax legislation is based on taxable assets and it is not based in income for fiscal years and has no relation with income), it is not included in the line “Income tax computed in accordance with BCRA’s rules”.
As mentioned in Note 5.1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Income tax computed in accordance with BCRA’s rules” corresponds to the Argentine GAAP income tax determined as the estimate of the income tax charge payable to the tax authorities for the relevant fiscal years. Under BCRA’s rules, income / (losses) related to deferred tax method must be classified in the “Other Income / Expenses” line items. Therefore, the deferred income tax recoverable amounting to 6,800, 8,400 and (25,800) for the fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, were classified in the “Other Expense” or “Other Income” line item of the Consolidated Statement of Operations (see Notes 6.j) and 6.k), as appropriate, with the breakdown of Other Income and Other Expense accounts in accordance with BCRA’s rules.
The allowances on deferred tax assets in accordance with U.S. GAAP are shown below:
The following table accounts for the difference between the actual tax provision under Argentine Central Bank regulations and the income tax computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP:
Explained below are the calculations made in order to reconcile the tax determined under BCRA regulations and with the tax determined under U.S. GAAP for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.
F-76
under U.S. GAAP it is possible to account for deferred tax assets based on the argument that such amount will eventually be recovered in the future.
Detailed below is a numeric reconciliation for a better comprehension of the above:
Explained below are the calculations made in order to reconcile the tax determined under BCRA regulations and with the tax determined under U.S. GAAP for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.
F-77
ASC 740-10, Income Taxes: Overall requires that an allowance for deferred tax assets is needed when, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The valuation allowance should be sufficient to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.
Accordingly, the Bank has assessed all available evidence to determine the amount of valuation allowance needed, including financial and tax projections. As a result, based on the weight of that evidence, the Bank reduced the valuation allowance in 266,690, 252,877and 231,100 as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Deferred tax assets (liabilities) are summarized as follows:
The natures of the most significant components of the deferred tax asset or liability are described as follows:
F-78
As of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 the Bank (on individual basis) does not carry accumulated tax loss carry-forwards.
The adjustments required in order reconciling assets and liabilities with the U.S. GAAP, as detailed in the following notes, are shown considering their effect on the income tax. The effect over continued operations of reflecting such adjustments on the Bank’s net assets causes them to increase by 284,545, 243,600 and 265,674 as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. In addition, income would have increased by 223,984 and 26,378 as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively and would have decreased by 58,961 as of December 31, 2013.
The effect over discontinued operations of reflecting such adjustments on the Bank’s net assets causes them to increase by 17,088 as of December 31, 2013. On the other hand, income would have decreased by 17,088 and 345 as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
The Bank understands that there is not significant uncertainty related to income tax benefits.
Tax on minimum presumed income
As of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the Income tax assessed was higher than the TOMPI. Therefore, a provision was raised for Income tax for such fiscal years.
The Bank recognizes fees on credit card products, consumer loans and acceptances when collected and charges direct origination costs when incurred. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, particularly under ASC 310-20, Receivables: Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs, loan origination fees and certain direct loan origination costs should be recognized over the life of the related loan as an adjustment of yield.
The effects of adjustments over continued operations required to state such amounts in accordance with US. GAAP would be decreased assets by 505,809, 336,662 and 235,356 at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. On the other hand, income over continued operations for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 would have decreased by 169,147, 101,306 and 90,728, respectively.
These adjustments do not have effects over discontinued operations.
The Bank provides for losses on loans generally through specific allocations on a loan-by-loan basis, once the loan becomes classified in a category which indicates that collectibility may be impaired, and also through mandatory
F-79
general provisions on performing loans, which serves to cover inherent loan losses for which specific provisions have not been made (see Note 3.4.5.).
ASC 310-10, Receivables: Overall, requires that an allowance for loan losses be maintained to cover estimated losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Under this concept, the specific allowances identified for individual loans or pools of loans are supplemented by an amount provided for inherent loan losses estimated to have been incurred but which are not identified based on individual loan reviews. The amount of inherent loss for loans not specifically provided is estimated based upon evaluation of historical write-off experience, mix of loans and other factors. BBVA Francés writes-off loans when believe that recovery is unlikely and, in any event, no later than seven months after a loan has been classified as “irrecoverable” without preferred guarantees and after 100% allowances have been recognized.
The Bank’s accounting for its loan loss reserve differs in some respects with practices of U.S.-based banks, as discussed below in Notes 25.3.1 and 25.3.2.
The following table discloses the amounts required by ASC 310-10, Receivables: Overall, as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013:
Under U.S. GAAP, the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the fiscal years presented is as follows:
The method applied to recognize income on loans is described in Note 3.4.6.
Additionally, the Bank has made use of the option granted by the BCRA authorizing financial entities to interrupt the accrual of interest for clients in the following categories:
According to the above, the threshold for suspending the accrual of interest is as from 91 days of arrears. Resumption of interest accrual takes place when the client improves its situation passing to situation:
Accrued interest remains on the Banks books and is considered a part of the loan balance. It allowances in its whole when the Bank determined the reserve for credit losses.
F-80
The Bank recognizes interest income on a cash basis for non-accrual loans. ASC 310-10, Receivables: Overall, requires that if the collectibility of the principal of the non-accrual loan is in doubt, cash payments should be applied to reduce the principal to the extent necessary to remove such doubt. Management believes that the effect of this difference in interest recognition is not material to the Bank’s Consolidated Statements of Operations taken as a whole.
ASC 310-10, Receivables: Overall, requires a creditor to measure impairment of a loan based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or at the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. This Standard is applicable to all loans (including those restructured in a troubled debt restructuring involving a modification of terms), except large groups of smaller-balance homogenous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment. The Bank considers commercial loans over 2,500 for individual impairment evaluations. Loans are considered impaired when, based on management’s evaluation, a borrower will not be able to fulfill its obligation under the original terms of the loan.
In classifying its clients, the Bank follows the guidelines set forth by the BCRA, which establishes a number of objective guidelines both for determining portfolios and for classification levels within them. Doubtful clients are those classified as “With problem”, “High Risk of Insolvency” and “Irrecoverable” for Commercial loans, and “Medium Risk”, “High Risk” and “Irrecoverable” for Consumer loans.
Had U.S. GAAP been applied over continued operations, the Bank’s assets would have increased by 497,890, 418,642 and 307,398 at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. On the other hand, the income would have increased by 79,248, 111,244 and 109,428 at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
The Bank recalculates its allowances for loan losses considering the criteria set forth by the U.S. GAAP and makes the necessary adjustments as indicated in the table below (which shows the impact on the shareholders’ equity of BBVA Francés):
BCRA
US GAAP
Diff.
Commercial
(sit 2-6)
F-81
According to BCRA regulations, a refinancing is considered to exist whenever any of the original contractually agreed conditions for a financing transaction (term, capital, interest or rate) are modified. The Central Bank does not define such terms as “restructuring” and “renegotiation”, which we understand to be included in the above-mentioned refinancing definition.
The amount of refinanced transactions as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 were 480,852 and 374,778, respectively.
The total of refinancing transactions granted during 2015 amounted to 442,678, of which 71.1% was in the performing portfolio (which are less than 90 days in arrears) as of December 31, 2015.
The total of refinancing transactions granted during 2014 amounted to 379,753, of which 78.9% was in the performing portfolio (which are less than 90 days in arrears) as of December 31, 2014.
The table below shows the number of restructured loans by portfolio segment, their outstanding amounts and their correspondent allowance for loan losses (i) at the time the restructuring was effected, (ii) one month before the restructuring, (iii) twelve months before the restructuring, and (iv) twelve months after the restructuring. It also includes the variation in the amount of allowances for loan losses between such periods.
Even when the information is at December 31, 2015, the loans which were restructured during the last months of the year have been outstanding less than 12 months and therefore the information shows partial values.
It is possible to observe in the table the variation of the allowances for loan losses during 2015 and 2014, which was similar in both years, and the positive impact of the restructuring. In particular, the table shows how the amount of allowances for loan losses increased as the level of restructurings loans increased.
-12 months
Q
Outstanding amount
Allowance
-1 month
Current month
+12 months
F-82
During 2015 there were nine restructuring transactions of commercial loans, all of them in the performing portfolio as of December 31, 2015. In the two cases of commercial loans refinanced in 2014, our refinancing guarantees improved, obtaining warrants.
As for the consumer segment, all the restructuring transactions effected during 2015 and 2014 had the following characteristics: (i) the debtor had paid, at a minimum, one installment in advance in order to qualify to the restructuring of its debt; (ii) we made sure before the restructuring that the debtor’s monthly payment capacity would be able to absorb the new monthly paying obligation resulting from the restructuring; (iii) the guarantees in force were in all cases maintained or, in the case of loans without guarantees, the execution capacity for the loan was improved; and (iv) all the restructurings currently in force are arranged in consecutive monthly payments, with a minimum of six months and a maximum of 60 months.
We concluded that all our refinanced loans comply with the conditions for considering them as troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) as defined under U.S. GAAP. In accordance with ASC 310-40 a restructured loan is considered a TDR if the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties and the Bank grants a concession to the debtor that would not otherwise be considered. Concessions granted could include: reduction in interest rate to rates that are considered below market, extension of repayment schedules and maturity dates beyond original contractual terms.
Loans considered TDR for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 were as follows:
F-83
We consider a TDR that have subsequently defaulted if the borrower has failed to make payments of either principal, interest or both for a period of 90 days or more from contractual due date. Loans considered TDR that have defaulted during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 were as follows:
The tables below disclose an aging analysis of our past due loans for December 31, 2015 and 2014:
December 31, 2015
December 31, 2014
F-84
During the fiscal year 2005, as a result of the Government’s debt restructuring, the Bank received for the defaulted portfolio Dollar-denominated Discount bonds amounted to US$26,083, and Peso-denominated Discount bonds amounted to 146,818. During the fiscal year 2006, the Bank swapped Provincial Development Trust Fund Corporate Bonds into BOGAR 2020, the face value of the corporate bonds swapped amounted to 551,230,672.
On January 30, 2009 the Bank exchanged Global 2008 secured loans at variable interest rate and maturing in 2011 for a nominal value of 321,340 (whose technical value on the date of the exchange was 1,018,447) for bonds issued by the Argentine Government, denominated in pesos and accruing interest at the private BADLAR rate plus 275 basis points and maturing in 2014.
According to U.S. GAAP, the Bank decided to classify these Government Securities as available for sale and carried at fair value (market value if available), with unrealized gains and losses reported as a net amount, net of income tax, within the stockholder’s equity accounts. However, ASC 320-10, Investments-Debt and Equity Securities: Overall, requires that if the decline in fair value is judged to be other than temporary, the cost of the security shall be written down to fair value, and the amount of the write down shall be included in earnings /(losses). This valuation criteria differ from BCRA’s rules, as described in Note 3.4.2.a).
At December 31, 2015 and 2014 and under BCRA regulations, the securities included in this category are carried at fair values with changes in fair value recognized in net income (see Note 3.4.2.a). The losses or (gains) recognized under U.S. GAAP for securities classified as available for sale are mainly related to realized gains (or losses) for securities at fair values under BCRA regulations (whose results are recognized as losses / gains for the fiscal year).
Under U.S. GAAP, the difference between fair value and amortized cost is recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) until the securities are realized. Therefore the results of continued operations under U.S. GAAP mainly correspond to realized gains and losses from the sale of securities, plus interest income on such securities.
In addition, under BCRA regulations the bank holds instruments issued by such BCRA at amortized cost (see Note 3.4.2.b). According to U.S. GAAP, the Bank decided to classify these securities as available for sale and carried at fair value (market value if available), with unrealized gains and losses reported as a net amount, net of income tax, within the stockholder’s equity accounts. Had U.S. GAAP been applied over continued operations, the Bank’s assets would have decreased by 8,572, 28,091 and 7,524 at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
The adjustments on net income comprise the effect of the securities carried at fair value with changes in income under BCRA regulations (Note 3.4.2.a), plus the effect of the instruments issued by BCRA at amortized cost (Note 3.4.2.b). Had U.S. GAAP been applied the income for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 would have decreased by 503,450 and 159,000, respectively, and would have increased by 147,934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.
To such effects, the following adjustments were made:
US GAAP stockholder equity
Result (a)
Gross unrealized Gains / (Loss) (b)
Net income
(a – b)
In accordance with U.S. GAAP, the amortized cost and fair value of Government securities available for sale as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:
F-85
The following table shows the disclosures about investments as of December 31, 2015 in an unrealized loss position that are not other than temporary impaired:
We have evaluated this decline in fair value to determine whether it is other than temporary and we have not recognized any other than temporary impairment for these securities for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 related to the following reasons:
Constitutional protection actions:
At December 31, 2003 the Bank recorded an asset for the difference in nominal terms between the deposits at the free market exchange rate at the moment of each payment compared to the book value of 1.40 pesos per dollar plus CER to that date. This asset was amortized in 60 monthly instalments as from April 2003 (see Note 3.4.13.). At December 31, 2015 the Bank cancelled this type of operations and the only ones that we had were related with the demand stood in a way by the holders of mutual funds shares.
ASC 450-30, Contingencies: Gain Contingencies requires that contingencies that might result in gains are not reflected in the accounts since to do so might be to recognize revenue prior to its realization. Had U.S. GAAP been applied over continued operations, the Bank’s assets would have decreased by 50,001, 37,043 and 31,034 at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. On the other hand the income would have decreased by 12,958, 6,009 and 1,263 at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
At December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the Bank accounted for the investment in the Buenos Aires Stock Exchange at the market value at that date. Under ASC 940-340, Financial Services – Broker and Dealers: Other Assets and Deferred Cost, such investments would have been valued at cost or at a lesser amount where there is an-other-than-temporary
F-86
impairment in value. Had U.S. GAAP been applied over continued operations, the Bank’s assets would have decreased by 18,388, 7,038 and 7,038 at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.
In addition, there are a number of companies which are under 20% and they were valued by the equity method in accordance with BCRA’s rules. Under ASC 323-10, Investments – Equity Method and Joint Venture: Overall and ASC 325-20, Investments – Other: Cost Method Investments, such investments, which are non-marketable securities, would have been valued at cost. Had U.S. GAAP been applied over continued operations, the Bank’s assets would have decreased by 80,527, 54,716 and 42,641 at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
On the other hand, the income over continued operations would have decreased by 37,161, 12,075 and 11,512 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively due to the effect of the differences mentioned in the preceding paragraphs.
The cost of vacations earned by employees is generally recorded by the Bank when the absence occur. ASC 710-10, Compensation-General: Overall requires that this expense be recorded on an accrual basis as the vacations are earned.
Had U.S. GAAP been applied over continued operations, the Bank’s liabilities would have increased by 434, 531 and 424 at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. In addition, the income for the fiscal year ended at December 31, 2015 would have increased by 97 and would have decreased by 107 and 35 at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
The Bank does not give accounting recognition to checks drawn against the Bank or other Banks or other items to be collected, until such time as the related item clears or is accepted. Such items are recorded by the Bank in Memorandum accounts. U.S. banks, however, account for such items through balance sheet clearing accounts at the time the items are presented.
Had U.S. GAAP been applied, the Bank’s assets and liabilities would have increased by approximately 2,574,378 and 2,103,556 at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
The same effect would be displayed in the Balance Sheet disclosure requirements in accordance with Regulation S-X (see Note 24.16.).
The Bank enters into forward and unsettled spot contracts with delivery of the underlying asset for trading purposes.
The Bank accounts for such forward and unsettled spot contracts on a basis different from that required by U.S. GAAP.
For such forward and unsettled spot transactions, the Bank recognizes both a receivable and a payable at the time of the agreement, which reflect the amount of cash, currency or securities to be exchanged at the closing date. The receivable or payable representing the receipt or delivery of securities or currency is stated at the quoted market value of such securities or currency (see Note 3.4.8.). In the United States, accounting for forward foreign exchange contracts and futures contracts are governed by ASC 815-10, Derivatives and Hedging: Overall, (see Note 25.14.). Under this standard, in general entities would not recognize a receivable or payable but would recognize the differences arising from changes in the market price of securities or currency to be received or delivered if the transaction did not qualify as a hedge.
F-87
Had U.S. GAAP been applied, the Bank’s assets and liabilities would have decreased by approximately 2,226,399 and 852,219 at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
A technical revaluation (inflation adjustments) of the Bank’s properties was made in 1981 to eliminate relative price distortions generated by the hyper inflation then prevailing in Argentina. This revaluation was recorded in the “Adjustments to stockholders’ equity” caption. Under BCRA’s rules, when an asset which had been revalued is sold at a loss, the loss is recorded directly to “Adjustments to stockholders’ equity” to the extent of the original revaluation. Under ASC 830-30, Foreign Currency Matters: Translation of Financial Statements, the technical valuation (inflation adjustments) is considered to be a permanent addition to equity and, accordingly, any loss on the sale of an asset which was revalued would be reflected in net income. There has been no sale of revalued assets during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2014. Consequently, the balance related to the previously mentioned revaluation included in the “Adjustments to Stockholders’ Equity” caption has not been modified.
Foreign trade acceptances are not recorded on the balance sheet by the Bank. In accordance with Regulation S-X, acceptances and related customer liabilities should be recorded on the balance sheet. The adjustment required to state the Bank’s balance sheets in accordance with Regulation S-X would be to increase assets (due from customers on acceptances) and increase liabilities (bank acceptances outstanding) by 511,695 and 290,735 at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Financial assets and liabilities recorded on the Consolidated Financial Statements are categorized based on the inputs to the valuation techniques as follows:
Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market that BBVA Francés has the ability to access.
They are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include the following:
F-88
Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. These inputs reflect management’s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability.
Assets and liabilities valued at their fair recurrent value as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:
Fair value measurements on a recurring basis as of
F-89
ASC 825-10, Financial Instruments: Overall, defines a financial instrument as cash, evidence of an ownership in an entity, or a contract that either conveys or imposes on an entity the contractual right or obligation to either receive or deliver cash or another financial instrument.
In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair value estimation are based on the quoted market price of a financial instrument with similar characteristics, the present value of expected future cash flow, or other valuation techniques, all of which are significantly affected by the assumptions used. Although management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of these financial instruments, there are inherent weaknesses in any estimation technique. As a result, the fair value may not be indicative of the net realizable or liquidation value. Furthermore, minor changes in the assumptions used could have a significant impact on the resulting estimated fair values.
In addition, disclosure of fair values is not required for non-financial assets and liabilities such as property and equipment, sundry assets and intangible assets and anticipated future business. As a result, the following fair values do not reflect the underlying value of the Bank.
A significant portion of the Bank’s assets and liabilities are in short-term financial instruments, with a remaining maturity of under one year, and/or with variable rates. These short-term and variable-rate financial instruments are considered to have a fair value equivalent to their carrying value at the balance sheet date.
For financial instruments with remaining maturity over one year and with fixed-rates, and therefore not included above, the following methods and assumptions were used to estimate their fair value:
Government and private securities
Holdings booked at amortized cost: fair value for these securities was taken to be equal to the present value of future cash flows discounted at the average year-end market interest rates for securities of similar interest rate, credit risk and maturity at December 31, 2015 and 2014. These assets are classified in Level 2.
Loans and receivables from financial leases
Fair value is estimated by discounting future cash flows using the current rates at which loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities, considering the contractual terms in effect as of December 31, 2015 and 2014. These assets are classified in Level 2 and 3.
Other receivables from financial transactions
Unlisted corporate bonds: the majority of these operations have a variable interest rate so the Bank considers that the fair value is the same that the carrying value at the balance sheet dates. These bonds are classified in Level 2.
Investments in other companies
The carrying value these instruments are considered to approximate fair value. These instruments are classified in Level 2.
Deposits
As a significant portion of the Bank’s deposits as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 (more than 99% considering the contractual terms in effect as of such date) have a remaining maturity less than one year, they were considered to have a fair value equivalent to their carrying value at the balance sheet date. These liabilities are classified in Level 2.
F-90
Other liabilities from financial transactions
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the majority of these operations have a variable interest rate or a maturity less than a year; in these cases the Bank considers that the fair value is the same that the carrying value at the balance sheet dates. These liabilities are classified in Level 1 and 2.
Off-Balance sheet
Commitments to extend credit, standby letter of credit, guarantees granted and foreign trade acceptances (see Note 25.17.).
It is estimated that the differential, if any, between the fee charged, which is equivalent to the carrying amount, by the Bank for these transactions and the average December 31, 2015 and 2014 market fee would not give rise to a material variance from the carrying amount.
The following is a summary of carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments at December 31, 2015 and 2014:
Carrying Amount (4)
Following, we disclose the financial assets and liabilities at December 31, 2015 and 2014 by levels:
F-91
The effect of adjustments over continued operations required to state such amounts in accordance with U.S. GAAP would have increased assets by 254,882 at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.
F-92
GAAP goodwill. Had U.S. GAAP been applied over continued operations, the Bank’s assets would have decreased by 309,577 as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.
ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts (collectively referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities. It requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position and measure those instruments at fair value. If certain conditions are met, a derivative may be specifically designated as (a) a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or an unrecognized firm commitment, (b) a hedge of the exposure to variable cash flows of a forecasted transaction, or (c) a hedge of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation, an unrecognized firm commitment, an available for sale security, or a foreign currency denominated forecasted transaction.
Had U.S. GAAP been applied, the assets over continued operations would have decreased by 1,648 and liabilities over continued operations would have increased by 31,258 at December 31, 2015. At December 31, 2014 the assets and liabilities over continued operations would have increased by 9,678 and 865, respectively. At December 31, 2013 the assets and liabilities over continued operations would have increased by 8,213 and 25,766, respectively. On the other hand, income over continued operations would have decreased by 41,719 and 23,554 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2013, respectively and would have increased by 26,366 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.
In Note 25.17.a), it is explained in detail the derivate instruments used by the Bank and the valuation methods of these instruments were explained in Notes 3.4.8. and 3.4.14.
As mentioned in Note 7.1, as from January 2015 the Bank has raised a provision for 48,567 for penalties enforced against it, to comply with the provisions under Communication “A” 5689 of the Argentine Central Bank requiring to book a provision for 100% of the amounts of penalties even if deems judicial or administrative action to suspend payment and whatever the status of the case. Notwithstanding, the Bank does not expect any adverse financial impacts in this respect.
Under U.S. GAAP, a provision should be raised when it is probable that a liability had been incurred at the date of the financial statements. Had U.S. GAAP been applied over continued operations, the Bank´s liabilities would have decreased by 48,817 at December 31, 2015. On the other hand, income for the fiscal year then ended would have increased by 48,817.
The Bank exhibits its non-controlling interests in consolidated subsidiaries like a caption outside its equity. In accordance with ASC 810-10, Consolidation: Overall, non-controlling interests in consolidated subsidiaries shall be reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets within equity, separately from the parent’s equity.
Had U.S. GAAP been applied over continued operations, the Bank’s Stockholders’ Equity would have increased by 344,047, 291,452 and 203,443 at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. In addition, income for the fiscal years ended at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 would have increased by 52,595, 88,009 and 83,935, respectively.
Had U.S. GAAP been applied over discontinued operations, the Bank’s Stockholders’ Equity would have increased by 8,970, 3,928 and 7,078 at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. In addition, income for the fiscal year ended at December 31, 2015 would have increased by 5,042 and would have decreased by 3,150 and 599 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015, respectively.
F-93
Consolidated Net Income December 31,
F-94
Consolidated Stockholders’ Equity December 31,
Had U.S. GAAP been applied, the amounts of the assets and liabilities would have been as follows:
F-95
Continued operations
Discontinued operations
(1) See Note 25.18.
F-96
Tax effects on Other Comprehensive Income / (Loss)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income / (Loss) balances
Foreign Currency
Items
Unrealized
Gains/
(Losses) on securities
As explained in Note 3.4.20., under BCRA’s rules, the Bank considers certain investments securities held for trading or financial transactions and loans to financial sector as cash equivalents. These cash equivalents include some investments with original maturities greater than three months which would not qualify as cash equivalents under ASC 230-10, Statements of Cash Flows: Overall as they were acquired when they had maturities over three months. In any case, all investments that would qualify as cash equivalents are required to be treated as cash equivalents under U.S. GAAP. In this respect, for U.S. GAAP purpose, the Bank has always considered that highly liquid investments are treated as investments rather than cash equivalents as permitted ASC 230-10.
For purposes of the accompanying statement of cash flows the Bank considers, under ASC 230-10, cash and due from banks to be cash and cash equivalents.
F-97
The following supplemental cash flow information separately presents the effect of exchange rate changes on cash:
The following cash flow information presents the effect of exchange rate changes on cash over continued operations:
Set forth below is the reconciliation of net income to net cash flow from operating activities, as required by ASC 230-10, Statements of Cash Flows: Overall, including the adjustments in Note 25.16 (instead of including the cash flow statement under U.S. GAAP):
F-98
BCRA GAAP
Adjustments
Cont
Disc
F-99
December 31, 2013
F-100
In May 2014, the FASB provides new accounting guidance to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue from contracts with customers. The new accounting guidance is effective on January 1, 2018.
The Bank does not anticipate that the adoption of this new statement at the required effective date will have a significant effect in its results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
In February 2015, the FASB provides amendments to Topic 810 (Consolidation). The amendments in this Update required to evaluate whether an entity should consolidate certain legal entities. All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation model. Specifically, the amendments: (i) modify the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are variable interest entities (VIEs) or voting interest entities; (ii) eliminate the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership; (iii) affect the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships; and (iv) provide a scope exception from consolidation guidance for reporting entities with interests in legal entities that are required to comply with or operate in accordance with requirements that are similar to those in Rule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 for registered money market funds.
The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. For all other entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and for interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period.
In September 2015, the FASB provides amendments to Topic 805 (Business Combinations). The amendments in this Update require that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. The amendments in this Update require that the acquirer record, in the same period’s financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date.
The amendments in this Update require an entity to present separately on the face of the income statement or disclose in the notes the portion of the amount recorded in current-period earnings by line item that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date.
For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The amendments in this Update should be applied prospectively to adjustments to provisional amounts that occur after the effective date of this Update with earlier application permitted for financial statements that have not been issued. For all other entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The amendments in this Update should be applied prospectively to adjustments to provisional amounts that occur after the effective date of this Update with earlier application permitted for financial statements that have not yet been made available for issuance.
F-101
In November 2015, the FASB provides amendments to Topic 740 (Income Taxes). The amendments in this Update require that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. The amendments in this Update apply to all entities that present a classified statement of financial position. The current requirement that deferred tax liabilities and assets of a tax-paying component of an entity be offset and presented as a single amount is not affected by the amendments in this Update.
For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for financial statements issued for nnual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. For all other entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018.
In February 2016, the FASB provides amendments to Topic 842. The amendments in this Update introduces a lessee model that brings most leases on the balance sheet. The new standard also aligns many of the underlying principles of the new lessor model with those in ASC 606, the FASB’s new revenue recognition standard. Furthermore, the ASU addresses other concerns related to the current leases model. The standard also requires lessors to increase the transparency of their exposure to changes in value of their residual assets and how they manage that exposure.
For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods therein. For all other entities, the ASU will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption will be permitted for all entities.
F-102