Big 5 Sporting Goods - 10-Q quarterly report FY

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” inRule 12b-2of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2of the Exchange Act).  Yes o     No þ

There were 21,830,023 shares of common stock, with a par value of $0.01 per share outstanding at April 28, 2008.

Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation (the “Company”) is a leading sporting goods retailer in the western United States, operating 364 stores in 11 states at March 30, 2008. The Company provides a full-line product offering in a traditional sporting goods store format that averages approximately 11,000 square feet. The Company’s product mix includes athletic shoes, apparel and accessories, as well as a broad selection of outdoor and athletic equipment for team sports, fitness, camping, hunting, fishing, tennis, golf, snowboarding and in-line skating. The Company is a holding company that operates as one business segment through Big 5 Corp., itswholly-ownedsubsidiary, and Big 5 Services Corp., which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Big 5 Corp. Big 5 Services Corp. provides a centralized operation for the issuance and administration of gift cards.

The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and are presented in accordance with the requirements ofForm 10-QandRule 10-01ofRegulation S-X.Accordingly, these interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. These interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2007 included in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K.In the opinion of management, the interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein contain all adjustments, including normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position, the results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

The operating results and cash flows of the interim periods presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any other interim period or the full year.

The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation, Big 5 Corp. and Big 5 Services Corp. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company follows the concept of a52-53 weekfiscal year, which ends on the Sunday nearest December 31. Fiscal year 2008 is comprised of 52 weeks and ends on December 28, 2008. Fiscal year 2007 was comprised of 52 weeks and ended on December 30, 2007. The fiscal interim periods in fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007 are comprised of 13 weeks.

Management has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period to prepare these condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the carrying amount of property and equipment, and goodwill; valuation allowances for receivables, sales returns, inventories and deferred income tax assets; estimates related to gift card breakage; estimates related to the valuation of stock options; and obligations related to asset retirements, litigation, workers’ compensation and employee benefits. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

The Company revised its previously reported unaudited condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the 13 weeks ended April 1, 2007 to reflect an increase of approximately $2.4 million in cash provided by operating activities and cash used in investing activities. The revision corrects a misclassification made in presenting the cash flow statement impact of accrued liabilities related to purchases of property and equipment. The correction had no effect on the Company’s previously reported condensed consolidated balance sheet, condensed consolidated statement of operations or net cash flows, and is not considered material to any previously reported consolidated financial statements.

The Company reclassified its previously reported unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations to conform to the current year presentation which increased cost of sales and decreased gross profit by $2.3 million and increased selling and administrative expense by $1.9 million for the first fiscal quarter of 2007 from amounts previously reported. Historically, the Company has presented total depreciation and amortization expense separately on the face of its unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations and its corporate headquarters’ occupancy costs within cost of sales. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, as presented in the Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the year ended December 30, 2007, the Company retrospectively changed its classification of distribution center and store occupancy depreciation and amortization expense to cost of sales and store equipment and corporate headquarters’ depreciation and amortization expense to selling and administrative expense. Depreciation and amortization expense is no longer presented separately in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. The corporate headquarters’ occupancy costs are now included in selling and administrative expense. This reclassification had no effect on the Company’s previously reported operating or net income, condensed consolidated balance sheet and condensed consolidated statement of cash flows, and is not considered material to any previously reported consolidated financial statements.

The Company earns revenue by selling merchandise primarily through its retail stores. Revenue is recognized when merchandise is purchased by and delivered to the customer and is shown net of estimated returns during the relevant period. The allowance for sales returns is estimated based upon historical experience. Cash received from the sale of gift cards is recorded as a liability, and revenue is recognized upon the redemption of the gift card or when it is determined that the likelihood of redemption is remote (“gift card breakage”) and no liability to relevant jurisdictions exists. The Company determines the gift card breakage rate based upon historical redemption patterns and recognizes gift card breakage over the estimated gift card redemption period (20 quarters as of the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2008). The Company records sales tax collected from its customers on a net basis, and therefore excludes it from revenues as defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”)06-3, How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement (That Is, Gross versus Net Presentation). Also included in revenue are sales of returned merchandise to vendors specializing in the resale of defective or used products, which have historically accounted for less than 1% of net sales.

The Company’s merchandise inventories are made up of finished goods and are valued at the lower of cost or market using the weighted-average cost method that approximates thefirst-in,first-out (“FIFO”) method. Average cost includes the direct purchase price of merchandise inventory, net of certain allowances, and allocated overhead costs associated with the Company’s distribution center. Management regularly reviews inventories to determine if the carrying value of the inventory exceeds market value and the Company records a reserve to reduce the carrying value to its market price, as necessary. Because of its merchandise mix, the Company has not historically experienced significant occurrences of obsolescence. However, these reserves are estimates, which could vary significantly, either favorably or unfavorably, from actual results if future economic conditions, consumer demand and competitive environments differ from expectations.

Inventory shrinkage is accrued as a percentage of merchandise sales based on historical inventory shrinkage trends. The Company performs physical inventories of its stores at least once per year and cycle count inventories at its distribution center throughout the year. The reserve for inventory shrinkage represents an estimate for inventory shrinkage for each store since the last physical inventory date through the reporting date.

The Company leases all but one of its store locations. The Company accounts for its leases under the provisions of SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases, and subsequent amendments, which require that leases be evaluated and classified as operating or capital leases for financial reporting purposes.

Certain leases may provide for payments based on future sales volumes at the leased location, which are not measurable at the inception of the lease. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 29, Determining Contingent Rentals, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, these contingent rents are expensed as they accrue.

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This standard provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. The standard also responds to investors’ requests for expanded information about the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings. The standard applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value, but does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. There are numerous previously issued statements dealing with fair values that are amended by SFAS No. 157. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position (“FSP”)FAS 157-1,Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13, which scopes out leasing transactions accounted for under SFAS No. 13,Accounting for Leases. In February 2008, FSPFAS 157-2,Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, was issued, which delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 to fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The implementation of SFAS No. 157 for financial assets and financial liabilities, effective December 31, 2007, did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS No. 159 provides companies with an option to report many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. The objective of SFAS No. 159 is to reduce both complexity in accounting for financial instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently. The FASB believes that SFAS No. 159 helps to mitigate accounting-induced volatility by enabling companies to report related assets and liabilities at fair value, which would likely reduce the need for companies to comply with detailed rules for hedge accounting. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities, and would require entities to display the fair value of those assets and liabilities for which the company has chosen to use fair value on the face of the balance sheet. The new statement does not eliminate disclosure requirements included in other accounting standards, including requirements for disclosures about fair value measurements included in SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company did not elect this fair value option; consequently, the adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not have an impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110 (“SAB 110”), which expresses the views of the SEC staff regarding the use of a “simplified” method, as discussed in the previously issued SAB 107, in developing an estimate of expected term of “plain vanilla” share options in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. In particular, the SEC staff indicated in SAB 107 that it will accept a company’s election to use the simplified method, regardless of whether the company has sufficient information to make more refined estimates of expected term. At the time SAB 107 was issued, the SEC staff believed that more detailed external information about employee exercise behavior (e.g., employee exercise patterns by industryand/or other categories of companies) would, over time, become readily available to companies. Therefore, the SEC staff stated in SAB 107 that it would not expect a company to use the simplified method for share option grants after December 31, 2007. The SEC staff understands that such detailed information about employee exercise behavior may not be widely available by December 31, 2007. Accordingly, the SEC staff will continue to accept, under certain circumstances, the use of the simplified method beyond December 31, 2007. Upon the Company’s adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company elected to use the simplified method to estimate the Company’s expected term. Effective December 31, 2007, the Company discontinued use of the simplified method when it determined that sufficient data was available to develop an estimate of the expected term based upon historical participant behavior. This transition resulted in a decrease in the expected term from 6.25 years for fiscal 2007 to 6.18 years for fiscal 2008 and did not have a material impact on the valuation of the Company’s share-based compensation expense.

The carrying values of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate the fair values of these instruments due to their short-term nature. The carrying amount for borrowings under the financing agreement approximates fair value because of the variable market interest rate charged to the Company for these borrowings.

The Company adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, for financial assets and financial liabilities in the first quarter of fiscal 2008, which did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In accordance with FASB Staff Position (“FSP FAS”)157-2,Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, the Company has deferred application of SFAS No. 157 until December 29, 2008, the beginning of the next fiscal year, in relation to nonrecurring nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities including goodwill impairment testing, asset retirement obligations, long-lived asset impairments and exit and disposal activities.

Accrued expenses consist of the following:

The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be realized or settled. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The realizability of deferred tax assets is assessed throughout the year and a valuation allowance is recorded if necessary to reduce net deferred tax assets to the amount more likely than not to be realized.

The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return and files tax returns in various state and local jurisdictions. The Company believes that the statutes of limitations for its consolidated federal income tax returns are open for years after 2004 and state and local income tax returns are open for years after 2003. The Company is not currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service or any other taxing authority.

The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, on January 1, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. At March 30, 2008 and December 30, 2007, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the Company’s effective income tax rate over the next 12 months.

The Company’s practice is to recognize interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses. At March 30, 2008 and December 30, 2007, the Company had no accrued interest or penalties.

The Company accounts for its stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R),Share-BasedPayment.

In the first quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company granted 301,000 stock options and 97,100 restricted (“nonvested”) stock awards to certain employees under the Company’s 2007 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). Under the Plan, options and nonvested stock awards granted generally vest and become exercisable at the rate of 25% per year with a maximum life of ten years. The exercise price of the options is equal to the market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The weighted-average grant-date fair value per option for stock options granted in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 and the first quarter of fiscal 2007 was $2.87 and $10.89, respectively. The grant-date fair value per share of the Company’s nonvested stock awards granted in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 was $7.91. The Company recognized approximately $0.5 million in stock-based compensation expense in both the first quarter of fiscal 2008 and the first quarter of fiscal 2007.

The fair value of each option on the date of grant is estimated using the Black-Scholes method based on the following weighted-average assumptions:

The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods corresponding with the expected term of the option; the expected term represents the weighted-average period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding giving consideration to vesting schedules and historical participant exercise behavior for fiscal 2008 and the simplified method pursuant to SAB 107 for fiscal 2007; the expected volatility is based upon historical volatilities of the Company’s common stock; and the expected dividend yield is based upon the Company’s current dividend rate and future expectations.

As of March 30, 2008, there was $3.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options granted. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.9 years.

The following table illustrates the Company’s nonvested stock awards activity for the first quarter of fiscal 2008:

The weighted-average grant-date fair value of nonvested stock awards is the quoted market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant, as shown in the table above.

As of March 30, 2008, there was $0.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock awards. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 4.0 years.

The Company calculates earnings per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share, which requires a dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share. Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by using the weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding adjusted to include the potentially dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and nonvested stock awards.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per common share:

The computation of diluted earnings per share for the first quarters of fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007 does not include options of 1,036,148 and 858,300, respectively, that were outstanding and antidilutive.

The Company repurchased 279,768 shares of its common stock for $2.8 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2008 and repurchased 700 shares of its common stock for $17,000 during the first quarter of fiscal 2007. Since the inception of its initial share repurchase program in May 2006, the Company has repurchased a total of 1,047,854 shares for $18.3 million. As of March 30, 2008, a total of $16.7 million remained available for share repurchases under the Company’s current share repurchase program.

On January 17, 2008, the Company was served with a complaint filed in the California Superior Court in the County of Los Angeles, entitled Adi Zimerman v. Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation, et al., Case No. BC383834, alleging violations of the California Civil Code. This complaint was brought as a purported class action on behalf of persons who made purchases at the Company’s stores in California using credit cards and were requested or required to provide their zip codes. The plaintiff alleges, among other things, that customers making purchases with credit cards at the Company’s stores in California were improperly requested to provide their zip code at the time of such purchases. The plaintiff seeks, on behalf of the class members, statutory penalties, injunctive relief to require the Company to discontinue the allegedly improper conduct and attorneys’ fees and costs. The Company believes that the complaint is without merit and intends to defend the suit vigorously. The Company is not able to evaluate the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or to estimate a range of potential loss in the event of an unfavorable outcome at the present time. If resolved unfavorably to the Company, this litigation could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, and any required change in the Company’s business practices, as well as the costs of defending this litigation, could have a negative impact on the Company’s results of operations.

On December 1, 2006, the Company was served with a complaint filed in the California Superior Court in the County of Orange, entitled Jack Lima v. Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation, et al., Case No. 06CC00243, alleging violations of the California Labor Code and the California Business and Professions Code. This complaint was brought as a purported class action on behalf of the Company’s California store managers. The plaintiff alleged, among other things, that the Company improperly classified store managers as exempt employees not entitled to overtime pay for work in excess of forty hours per week and failed to provide store managers with paid meal and rest periods. In the fourth quarter ended December 30, 2007, the Company and the plaintiff reached a

In February 2008, the Company entered into a lease for a parcel of land with an existing building adjacent to its corporate headquarters location. The lease term commences in 2009 and the primary term expires on February 28, 2019, which may be renewed for six successive periods of five years each. In accordance with terms of the lease agreement, the Company is committed to the construction of a new retail building on the premises before the primary term expires in 2019, regardless of whether or not any renewal options are exercised.

The Company is involved in various other claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

In the second quarter of fiscal 2008 the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.09 per share of outstanding common stock, which will be paid on June 13, 2008 to stockholders of record as of May 30, 2008.

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Corporation”) as of March 30, 2008 and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 30, 2008 and April 1, 2007. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporation’s management.

We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such condensed consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 30, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 10, 2008, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 30, 2007 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

This discussion and analysis of the Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation (“we”, “our”, “us”) financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included herein and our consolidated financial statements and related notes, and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the year ended December 30, 2007, contained in our Annual Report onForm 10-K.

We are a leading sporting goods retailer in the western United States, operating 364 stores in 11 states under the name “Big 5 Sporting Goods” at March 30, 2008. We provide a full-line product offering in a traditional sporting goods store format that averages approximately 11,000 square feet. Our product mix includes athletic shoes, apparel and accessories, as well as a broad selection of outdoor and athletic equipment for team sports, fitness, camping, hunting, fishing, tennis, golf, snowboarding and in-line skating.

The results of the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire fiscal year.

The following table sets forth selected items from our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations by dollar and as a percentage of our net sales for the periods indicated:

Net Sales.  Net sales decreased by $4.1 million, or 1.9%, to $212.9 million in the 13 weeks ended March 30, 2008 from $217.0 million in the same period last year. The decrease in net sales was primarily attributable to the following:

Gross Profit.  Gross profit decreased by $4.2 million, or 5.5%, to $71.6 million, or 33.6% of net sales, in the 13 weeks ended March 30, 2008 from $75.8 million, or 34.9% of net sales, in the 13 weeks ended April 1, 2007. The decrease in gross profit was primarily attributable to the following:

Selling and Administrative.  Selling and administrative expense increased by $1.4 million to $63.2 million, or 29.7% of net sales, in the 13 weeks ended March 30, 2008 from $61.8 million, or 28.4% of net sales, in the same period last year. The increase in selling and administrative expense as a percentage of sales for the 13 weeks ended March 30, 2008 compared to the same period last year reflects softer sales conditions. Store-related expenses, excluding occupancy, increased by $1.6 million, or 108 basis points as a percentage of net sales, due primarily to an increase in store count. Advertising expense increased nominally from the prior year and grew 13 basis points as a percentage of net sales.

Interest Expense.  Interest expense increased by $0.2 million, or 9.7%, to $1.6 million in the 13 weeks ended March 30, 2008 from $1.4 million in the same period last year. The increase in interest expense primarily reflects higher average debt levels of approximately $27.2 million to $105.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 from $78.5 million in the same period last year. This was partially offset by a decrease in average interest rates of approximately 80 basis points to 5.8% in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 from 6.6% in the same period last year.

Income Taxes.  The provision for income taxes was $2.6 million for the 13 weeks ended March 30, 2008 and $4.9 million for the 13 weeks ended April 1, 2007. Our effective tax rate was 39.1% for the first quarter of fiscal 2008 compared with 39.4% for the first quarter of fiscal 2007.

Our principal liquidity requirements are for working capital, capital expenditures, stock repurchases and cash dividends. We fund our liquidity requirements primarily through cash on hand, cash flow from operations and borrowings from our revolving credit facility. We believe our cash on hand, future funds from operations and borrowings from our revolving credit facility will be sufficient to finance our anticipated cash requirements for at least the next twelve months. There is no assurance, however, that we will be able to generate sufficient cash flow or that we will be able to maintain our ability to borrow under our revolving credit facility.

We ended the first quarter of fiscal 2008 with $7.5 million of cash and cash equivalents compared with $6.8 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2007. Our cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for the first quarter of fiscal 2008 and 2007 were as follows:

Operating Activities.  Net cash provided by operating activities for the 13 weeks ended March 30, 2008 and April 1, 2007 was $20.0 million and $19.0 million, respectively. The increase in cash provided by operating activities for the first quarter of fiscal 2008 compared to the same quarter last year primarily reflects reduced funding for working capital, partially offset by lower net income for the period. The decrease in funding for working capital was primarily due to lower merchandise inventory purchases in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 to better align inventory balances with weaker sales conditions. The effect of purchasing less merchandise inventory was partially offset by a greater reduction in accounts payable and accrued expenses related primarily to employee benefit plans, advertising costs and various other accruals.

Investing Activities.  Net cash used in investing activities for the 13 weeks ended March 30, 2008 and April 1, 2007 was $4.8 million and $4.6 million, respectively. Capital expenditures, excluding non-cash acquisitions, represented substantially all of the net cash used in investing activities for both periods. Capital spending reflects new store openings, store-related remodeling, distribution center costs and computer hardware and software purchases.

Financing Activities.  Net cash used in financing activities for the 13 weeks ended March 30, 2008 and April 1, 2007 was $17.4 million and $12.7 million, respectively. For the first quarter of fiscal 2008, cash was used primarily to pay down borrowings under our revolving credit facility, repurchase stock and pay dividends. For the first quarter of fiscal 2007, cash was primarily used to pay down borrowings under our revolving credit facility and pay dividends.

As of March 30, 2008, we had revolving credit borrowings of $97.3 million and letter of credit commitments of $1.1 million outstanding under our financing agreement. These balances compare to revolving credit borrowings of $103.4 million and letter of credit commitments of $0.4 million outstanding as of December 30, 2007 and revolving credit borrowings of $67.5 million and letter of credit commitments of $0.7 million outstanding as of April 1, 2007.

Quarterly dividend payments of $0.09 per share were paid in fiscal 2007 and the first quarter of fiscal 2008. In the second quarter of fiscal 2008, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.09 per share of outstanding common stock, which will be paid on June 13, 2008 to stockholders of record as of May 30, 2008.

Periodically, we repurchase our common stock in the open market pursuant to programs approved by our Board of Directors. We may repurchase our common stock for a variety of reasons, including the current market price of our stock, to offset dilution related to equity-based compensation plans and optimizing our capital structure.

We repurchased 279,768 shares of our own common stock for $2.8 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2008 and repurchased 700 shares of our own common stock for $17,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2007. Since the inception of our initial share repurchase program, we have repurchased a total of 1,047,854 shares for $18.3 million. As of March 30, 2008, a total of $16.7 million remained available for share repurchases under our current share repurchase program.

Future Capital Requirements.  We had cash on hand of $7.5 million at March 30, 2008. We expect capital expenditures for the remaining three quarters of fiscal 2008, excluding non-cash acquisitions, to range from approximately $19.0 million to $20.0 million, primarily to fund the opening of approximately 19 new stores, net of closures and relocations, store-related remodeling, distribution center equipment, corporate office and distribution center improvements and computer hardware and software purchases. As of March 30, 2008, a total of $16.7 million remained available for share repurchases under our share repurchase program. We consider several factors in determining when and if we make share repurchases including, among other things, our alternative cash requirements and the market price of our stock. In the second quarter of fiscal 2008, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.09 per share of outstanding common stock, which will be paid on June 13, 2008 to stockholders of record as of May 30, 2008.

We believe our cash on hand, future funds from operations and borrowings from our revolving credit facility will be sufficient to finance our anticipated cash requirements for at least the next twelve months. However, our ability to satisfy such cash requirements depends upon our future performance, which in turn is subject to general economic conditions and regional risks, and to financial, business and other factors affecting our operations, including factors beyond our control. See Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” included in this report and Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” included in our Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended December 30, 2007.

If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to meet our obligations and commitments, we will be required to refinance or restructure our indebtedness or raise additional debt or equity capital. Additionally, we may be required to sell material assets or operations, discontinue repurchasing our stock, suspend dividend payments or delay or forego expansion opportunities. We might not be able to effect successful alternative strategies on satisfactory terms, if at all.

Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments.  Our material off-balance sheet contractual commitments are operating lease obligations and letters of credit. We excluded these items from the balance sheet in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Operating lease commitments consist principally of leases for our retail store facilities, distribution center and corporate office. These leases frequently include options which permit us to extend the terms beyond the initial fixed lease term. With respect to most of those leases, we intend to renegotiate those leases as they expire.

Issued and outstanding letters of credit were $1.1 million at March 30, 2008, and were related primarily to importing of merchandise and funding insurance program liabilities.

We also have capital lease obligations which consist principally of leases for our distribution center delivery trailers and management information systems hardware. Included in our other liabilities is an employment agreement obligation for Robert W. Miller, co-founder of the Company, and asset retirement obligations related to the removal of leasehold improvements from our stores upon termination of our store leases.

Included in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section of Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the year ended December 30, 2007 is a discussion of our future obligations and commitments as of December 30, 2007. In the first quarter of fiscal 2008, our revolving credit borrowings decreased by $6.1 million and we entered into new operating lease agreements in relation to our store expansion and business operations. We do not believe that these operating leases would materially change our contractual obligations or commitments presented as of December 30, 2007.

In the ordinary course of business, we enter into arrangements with vendors to purchase merchandise in advance of expected delivery. Because most of these purchase orders do not contain any termination payments or other penalties if cancelled, they are not included as outstanding contractual obligations.

Financing Agreement.  On December 15, 2004, we entered into a $160.0 million financing agreement with The CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc. and a syndicate of other lenders. On May 24, 2006, we amended the financing agreement to, among other things, increase the line of credit to $175.0 million.

The initial termination date of the revolving credit facility is March 20, 2011 (subject to annual extensions thereafter). The revolving credit facility may be terminated by the lenders by giving at least 90 days prior written notice before any anniversary date, commencing with its anniversary date on March 20, 2011. We may terminate the revolving credit facility by giving at least 30 days prior written notice, provided that if we terminate prior to March 20, 2011, we must pay an early termination fee. Unless it is terminated, the revolving credit facility will continue on an annual basis from anniversary date to anniversary date beginning on March 21, 2011.

The revolving credit facility bears interest at various rates based on our overall borrowings, with a floor of LIBOR plus 1.00% or the JP Morgan Chase Bank prime lending rate and a ceiling of LIBOR plus 1.50% or the JP Morgan Chase Bank prime lending rate.

Our financing agreement is secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all of our assets. Our financing agreement contains various financial and other covenants, including covenants that require us to maintain a fixed-charge coverage ratio of not less than 1.0 to 1.0 in certain circumstances, restrict our ability to incur indebtedness or to create various liens and restrict the amount of capital expenditures that we may incur. Our financing agreement also restricts our ability to engage in mergers or acquisitions, sell assets, repurchase our stock or pay dividends. We may repurchase our stock or declare a dividend only if no default or event of default exists on the dividend declaration date and a default is not expected to result from the payment of the dividend and certain other criteria are met, as more fully described in Part II, Item 2, “Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds,” in this report. We are currently in compliance with all covenants under our financing agreement. If we fail to make any required payment under our financing agreement or if we otherwise default under this instrument, our debt may be accelerated under this agreement. This acceleration could also result in the acceleration of other indebtedness that we may have outstanding at that time.

We experience seasonal fluctuations in our net sales and operating results and typically generate higher operating income in the fourth quarter, which includes the holiday selling season as well as the winter sports selling season. As a result, we incur significant additional expense in the fourth quarter due to normally higher purchase volumes and increased staffing. Seasonality influences our buying patterns which directly impacts our merchandise and accounts payable levels and cash flows. We purchase merchandise for seasonal activities in advance of a season. If we miscalculate the demand for our products generally or for our product mix during the fourth quarter, our net sales can decline, resulting in excess inventory, which can harm our financial performance. Because a larger portion of our operating income is typically derived from our fourth quarter net sales, a shortfall in expected fourth quarter net sales can negatively impact our annual operating results.

In fiscal 2008, we are experiencing increasing inflation in the purchase cost of certain products. If we are unable to adjust our selling prices, our product selling margins will decline, which could adversely impact our operating results. We do not believe that inflation had a material impact on our operating results for fiscal 2007.

As discussed in Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section of the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended December 30, 2007, we consider our estimates on inventory valuation, vendor allowances, impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill, stock-based compensation and self-insurance reserves to be the most critical in understanding the judgments that are involved in preparing our consolidated financial statements. There have been no significant changes to these estimates in the first quarter of fiscal 2008.

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This standard provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. The standard also responds to investors’ requests for expanded information about the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings. The standard applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value, but does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. There are numerous previously issued statements dealing with fair values that are amended by SFAS No. 157. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position (“FSP”)FAS 157-1,Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13, which scopes out leasing transactions accounted for under SFAS No. 13,Accounting for Leases. In February 2008, FSPFAS 157-2,Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, was issued, which delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 to fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The implementation of SFAS No. 157 for financial assets and financial liabilities, effective December 31, 2007, did not have a material impact on our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. We are currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS No. 159 provides companies with an option to report many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. The objective of SFAS No. 159 is to reduce both complexity in accounting for financial instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently. The FASB believes that SFAS No. 159 helps to mitigate accounting-induced volatility by enabling companies to report related assets and liabilities at fair value, which would likely reduce the need for companies to comply with detailed rules for hedge accounting. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities, and would require entities to display the fair value of those assets and liabilities for which the company has chosen to use fair value on the face of the balance sheet. The new statement does not eliminate disclosure requirements included in other accounting standards, including requirements for disclosures about fair value measurements included in SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. We did not elect this fair value option; consequently, the adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not have an impact on our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110 (“SAB 110”), which expresses the views of the SEC staff regarding the use of a “simplified” method, as discussed in the previously issued SAB 107, in developing an estimate of expected term of “plain vanilla” share options in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. In particular, the SEC staff indicated in SAB 107 that it will accept a company’s election to use the simplified method, regardless of whether the company has sufficient information to make more refined estimates of expected term. At the time SAB 107 was issued, the SEC staff believed that more detailed external information about employee exercise behavior (e.g., employee exercise patterns by industryand/or other categories of companies) would, over time, become readily available to companies. Therefore, the SEC staff stated in SAB 107 that it would not expect a company to use the simplified method for share option grants after December 31, 2007. The SEC staff understands that such detailed information about employee exercise behavior may not be widely available by December 31, 2007. Accordingly, the SEC staff will continue to accept, under certain circumstances, the use of the simplified method beyond December 31, 2007. Upon our adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), we elected to use the simplified method to estimate our expected term. Effective December 31, 2007, we discontinued use of the simplified method when we determined that sufficient data was available to develop an estimate of the expected term based upon historical participant behavior. This transition resulted in

This document includes certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, our financial condition, our results of operations, our growth strategy and the business of our company generally. In some cases, you can identify such statements by terminology such as “may”, “could”, “project”, “estimate”, “potential”, “continue”, “should”, “expects”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “intends” or other such terminology. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results in future periods to differ materially from forecasted results. These risks and uncertainties include, among other things, continued or worsening weakness in the consumer spending environment, the competitive environment in the sporting goods industry in general and in our specific market areas, inflation, product availability and growth opportunities, seasonal fluctuations, weather conditions, changes in cost of goods, operating expense fluctuations, disruption in product flow or increased costs related to distribution center operations, changes in interest rates, credit availability and economic conditions in general. Those and other risks and uncertainties are more fully described in Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in this report and in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report onForm 10-Kand other filings with the SEC. We caution that the risk factors set forth in this report are not exclusive. In addition, we conduct our business in a highly competitive and rapidly changing environment. Accordingly, new risk factors may arise. It is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors, nor to assess the impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any individual risk factor, or combination of factors, may cause results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statement that may be made from time to time by us or on our behalf.

We are subject to risks resulting from interest rate fluctuations since interest on our borrowings under our revolving credit facility are based on variable rates. If the LIBOR rate were to change 1.0% as compared to the rate at March 30, 2008, our interest expense would change approximately $1.0 million on an annual basis based on the outstanding balance of our borrowings under our revolving credit facility at March 30, 2008. We do not hold any derivative instruments and do not engage in foreign currency transactions or hedging activities.

We conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined inRules 13a-15(e)and15d-15(e)under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act and are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

During the fiscal quarter ended March 30, 2008, no changes occurred with respect to our internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.

On January 17, 2008, the Company was served with a complaint filed in the California Superior Court in the County of Los Angeles, entitled Adi Zimerman v. Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation, et al., Case No. BC383834, alleging violations of the California Civil Code. This complaint was brought as a purported class action on behalf of persons who made purchases at the Company’s stores in California using credit cards and were requested or required to provide their zip codes. The plaintiff alleges, among other things, that customers making purchases with credit cards at the Company’s stores in California were improperly requested to provide their zip code at the time of such purchases. The plaintiff seeks, on behalf of the class members, statutory

On December 1, 2006, the Company was served with a complaint filed in the California Superior Court in the County of Orange, entitled Jack Lima v. Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation, et al., Case No. 06CC00243, alleging violations of the California Labor Code and the California Business and Professions Code. This complaint was brought as a purported class action on behalf of the Company’s California store managers. The plaintiff alleged, among other things, that the Company improperly classified store managers as exempt employees not entitled to overtime pay for work in excess of forty hours per week and failed to provide store managers with paid meal and rest periods. In the fourth quarter ended December 30, 2007, the Company and the plaintiff reached a confidential agreement providing for the full and complete settlement and release of all of the plaintiff’s individual claims and a dismissal of all claims purportedly brought on behalf of the class members in exchange for the Company’s payment of non-material amounts to the plaintiff and the plaintiff’s counsel. The Company admitted no liability or wrongdoing with respect to the claims set forth in the lawsuit. In the first quarter of fiscal 2008, the court approved the parties’ settlement agreement and all claims were dismissed.

The Company is involved in various other claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

There have been no material changes to the risk factors identified in Part  I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors”, of the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended December 30, 2007.

The following tabular summary reflects the Company’s repurchase activity during the fiscal quarter ended March 30, 2008:

None.

None.

None.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.