UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
OR
Commission File Number: 001-33551
The Blackstone Group L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
345 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10154
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
(212) 583-5000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer ¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The number of the Registrant’s voting common units representing limited partner interests outstanding as of July 31, 2012 was 417,258,208. The number of the Registrant’s non-voting common units representing limited partner interests outstanding as of July 31, 2012 was 101,334,234.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — June 30, 2012 and 2011:
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 1A.
UNAUDITED SUPPLEMENTAL PRESENTATION OF STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ITEM 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
RISK FACTORS
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
ITEM 5.
ITEM 6.
EXHIBITS
SIGNATURES
Forward-Looking Statements
This report may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 which reflect our current views with respect to, among other things, our operations and financial performance. You can identify these forward-looking statements by the use of words such as “outlook,” “believes,” “expects,” “potential,” “continues,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “seeks,” “approximately,” “predicts,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates,” “anticipates” or the negative version of these words or other comparable words. Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, there are or will be important factors that could cause actual outcomes or results to differ materially from those indicated in these statements. We believe these factors include but are not limited to those described under the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 and in this report, as such factors may be updated from time to time in our periodic filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), which are accessible on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. These factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with the other cautionary statements that are included in this report and in our other periodic filings. The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.
1
In this report, references to “Blackstone,” the “Partnership”, “we,” “us” or “our” refer to The Blackstone Group L.P. and its consolidated subsidiaries. Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this report to the ownership of Mr. Stephen A. Schwarzman, our founder, and other Blackstone personnel include the ownership of personal planning vehicles and family members of these individuals.
“Blackstone Funds,” “our funds” and “our investment funds” refer to the private equity funds, real estate funds, funds of hedge funds, credit-oriented funds, collateralized loan obligation (“CLO”) vehicles, and closed-end mutual funds and management investment companies that are managed by Blackstone. “Our carry funds” refer to the private equity funds, real estate funds and certain of the credit-oriented funds (with multi-year drawdown, commitment-based structures that only pay carry on the realization of an investment) that are managed by Blackstone. Blackstone’s Private Equity segment comprises its management of private equity funds (including our sector and regional focused funds), which we refer to collectively as our Blackstone Capital Partners (“BCP”) funds, and certain multi-asset class investment funds. We refer to our real estate opportunistic funds as our Blackstone Real Estate Partners (“BREP”) funds and our real estate debt investment funds as our “BREDS” funds. “Our hedge funds” refer to our funds of hedge funds, certain of our real estate debt investment funds and certain other credit-oriented funds (including four publicly registered investment companies), which are managed by Blackstone.
“Assets under management” refers to the assets we manage. Our assets under management equals the sum of:
Our carry funds are commitment-based drawdown structured funds that do not permit investors to redeem their interests at their election. Our funds of hedge funds and hedge funds generally have structures that afford an investor the right to withdraw or redeem their interests on a periodic basis (e.g., annually or quarterly), in most cases upon advance written notice, with the majority of our funds requiring from 60 days up to 95 days’ notice, depending on the fund and the liquidity profile of the underlying assets. Investment advisory agreements related to separately managed accounts may generally be terminated by an investor on 30 to 90 days’ notice.
“Fee-earning assets under management” refers to the assets we manage on which we derive management and / or performance fees. Our fee-earning assets under management equals the sum of:
2
Our calculations of assets under management and fee-earning assets under management may differ from the calculations of other asset managers, and as a result this measure may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other asset managers. In addition, our calculation of assets under management includes commitments to, and the fair value of, invested capital in our funds from Blackstone and our personnel, regardless of whether such commitments or invested capital are subject to fees. Our definitions of assets under management or fee-earning assets under management are not based on any definition of assets under management or fee-earning assets under management that is set forth in the agreements governing the investment funds that we manage.
For our carry funds, total assets under management includes the fair value of the investments held, whereas fee-earning assets under management includes the amount of capital commitments or the remaining amount of invested capital at cost depending on whether the investment period has or has not expired. As such, fee-earning assets under management may be greater than total assets under management when the aggregate fair value of the remaining investments is less than the cost of those investments.
This report does not constitute an offer of any Blackstone Fund.
3
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
THE BLACKSTONE GROUP L.P.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition (Unaudited)
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Unit Data)
Assets
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash Held by Blackstone Funds and Other
Investments (including assets pledged of $115,354 and $101,298 at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively)
Accounts Receivable
Reverse Repurchase Agreements
Due from Affiliates
Intangible Assets, Net
Goodwill
Other Assets
Deferred Tax Assets
Total Assets
Liabilities and Partners’ Capital
Loans Payable
Due to Affiliates
Accrued Compensation and Benefits
Securities Sold, Not Yet Purchased
Repurchase Agreements
Accounts Payable, Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities
Total Liabilities
Commitments and Contingencies
Redeemable Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities
Partners’ Capital
Partners’ Capital (common units: 519,754,704 issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2012; 489,430,907 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2011)
Appropriated Partners’ Capital
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities
Non-Controlling Interests in Blackstone Holdings
Total Partners’ Capital
Total Liabilities and Partners’ Capital
continued…
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
(Dollars in Thousands)
The following presents the portion of the consolidated balances presented above attributable to consolidated Blackstone Funds which are variable interest entities. The following assets may only be used to settle obligations of these consolidated Blackstone Funds and these liabilities are only the obligations of these consolidated Blackstone Funds and they do not have recourse to the general credit of Blackstone.
Investments
Liabilities
Accounts Payable, Accrued Expenses and Other
5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Unit and Per Unit Data)
Revenues
Management and Advisory Fees, Net
Performance Fees
Realized
Carried Interest
Incentive Fees
Unrealized
Total Performance Fees
Investment Income (Loss)
Total Investment Income (Loss)
Interest and Dividend Revenue
Other
Total Revenues
Expenses
Compensation and Benefits Compensation
Performance Fee Compensation
Total Compensation and Benefits
General, Administrative and Other
Interest Expense
Fund Expenses
Total Expenses
Other Income (Loss)
Net Gains (Losses) from Fund Investment Activities
Income Before Provision for Taxes
Provision for Taxes
Net Income
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Redeemable Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Non-Controlling Interests in Blackstone Holdings
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to The Blackstone Group L.P.
Net Income (Loss) Per Common Unit — Basic and Diluted
Weighted-Average Common Units Outstanding — Basic
Weighted-Average Common Units Outstanding — Diluted
Revenues Earned from Affiliates
Management and Advisory Fees
6
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax — Currency Translation Adjustment
Comprehensive Income
Less:
Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to Redeemable Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities
Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities
Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to Non-Controlling Interests in Blackstone Holdings
Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to The Blackstone Group L.P.
7
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital (Unaudited)
Balance at December 31, 2011
Transition and Acquisition Adjustments Relating to Consolidation of CLO Entities
Net Income (Loss)
Allocation of Income of Consolidated CLO Entities
Currency Translation Adjustment
Allocation of Currency Translation Adjustment of Consolidated Collateralized Loan Obligations
Capital Contributions
Capital Distributions
Transfer of Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities
Purchase of Interests from Certain Non-Controlling Interest Holders
Deferred Tax Effects Resulting from Acquisition of Ownership Interests from Non- Controlling Interest Holders
Equity-Based Compensation
Relinquished in Deconsolidation and Liquidation of Partnership
Net Delivery of Vested Common Units
Change in The Blackstone Group L.P.’s Ownership Interest
Conversion of Blackstone Holdings Partnership Units to Blackstone Common Units
Balance at June 30, 2012
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
8
Balance at December 31, 2010
Dividend
Repurchase of Common Units and Blackstone Holdings Partnership Units
Balance at June 30, 2011
9
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
Operating Activities
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities:
Blackstone Funds Related:
Unrealized Depreciation (Appreciation) on Investments Allocable to Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities
Net Realized Gains on Investments
Changes in Unrealized Gains on Investments Allocable to The Blackstone Group L.P.
Unrealized Depreciation (Appreciation) on Hedge Activities
Non-Cash Performance Fees
Non-Cash Performance Fee Compensation
Equity-Based Compensation Expense
Amortization of Intangibles
Other Non-Cash Amounts Included in Net Income
Cash Flows Due to Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
Cash Relinquished with Deconsolidation and Liquidation of Partnership
Treasury Cash Management Strategies:
Investments Purchased
Cash Proceeds from Sale of Investments
Cash Proceeds from Sale or Pay Down of Investments
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Investing Activities
Purchase of Furniture, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements
Net Cash Paid for Acquisitions, Net of Cash Acquired
Changes in Restricted Cash
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
10
Financing Activities
Distributions to Non-Controlling Interest Holders in Consolidated Entities
Contributions from Non-Controlling Interest Holders in Consolidated Entities
Net Settlement of Vested Common Units and Repurchase of Common and Holdings Units
Proceeds from Loans Payable
Repayment of Loans Payable
Distributions to Unitholders
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flows Information
Payments for Interest
Payments for Income Taxes
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities
Net Activities Related to Capital Transactions of Consolidated Blackstone Funds
Net Assets Related to the Consolidation of CLO Vehicles
In-kind Redemption of Capital
In-kind Contribution of Capital
Transfer of Interests to Non-Controlling Interest Holders
Net Settlement of Vested Common Units
Conversion of Blackstone Holdings Units to Common Units
Exchange of Founders’ and Non-Controlling Interest Holders’ Interests in Blackstone Holdings:
Deferred Tax Asset
11
(All Dollars Are in Thousands, Except Unit and Per Unit Data, Except Where Noted)
The Blackstone Group L.P., together with its subsidiaries, (“Blackstone” or the “Partnership”) is a leading global manager of private capital and provider of financial advisory services. The alternative asset management business includes the management of private equity funds, real estate funds, funds of hedge funds, credit-oriented funds, collateralized loan obligation (“CLO”) vehicles, separately managed accounts, and registered investment companies (collectively referred to as the “Blackstone Funds”). Blackstone also provides various financial advisory services, including financial advisory, restructuring and reorganization advisory and fund placement services. Blackstone’s business is organized into five segments: private equity, real estate, hedge fund solutions, credit businesses, and financial advisory.
The Partnership was formed as a Delaware limited partnership on March 12, 2007. The Partnership is managed and operated by its general partner, Blackstone Group Management L.L.C., which is in turn wholly-owned and controlled by one of Blackstone’s founders, Stephen A. Schwarzman (the “Founder”), and Blackstone’s other senior managing directors.
The activities of the Partnership are conducted through its holding partnerships: Blackstone Holdings I L.P., Blackstone Holdings II L.P., Blackstone Holdings III L.P. and Blackstone Holdings IV L.P. (collectively, “Blackstone Holdings”, “Blackstone Holdings Partnerships” or the “Holding Partnerships”). On June 18, 2007, in preparation for an initial public offering (“IPO”), the predecessor owners (“Predecessor Owners”) of the Blackstone business completed a reorganization (the “Reorganization”) whereby, with certain limited exceptions, the operating entities of the predecessor organization and the intellectual property rights associated with the Blackstone name were contributed (“Contributed Businesses”) to five holding partnerships (Blackstone Holdings I L.P., Blackstone Holdings II L.P., Blackstone Holdings III L.P., Blackstone Holdings IV L.P. and Blackstone Holdings V L.P.) either directly or indirectly via a sale to certain wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Partnership and then a contribution to the Holding Partnerships. The Partnership, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, is the sole general partner in each of these Holding Partnerships. The reorganization was accounted for as an exchange of entities under common control for the component of interests contributed by the Founders and the other senior managing directors (collectively, the “Control Group”) and as an acquisition of non-controlling interests using the purchase method of accounting for all the predecessor owners other than the Control Group.
On January 1, 2009, the number of Holding Partnerships was reduced from five to four through the transfer of assets and liabilities of Blackstone Holdings III L.P. to Blackstone Holdings IV L.P. In connection therewith, Blackstone Holdings IV L.P. was renamed Blackstone Holdings III L.P. and Blackstone Holdings V L.P. was renamed Blackstone Holdings IV L.P. Blackstone Holdings refers to the five holding partnerships prior to the January 2009 reorganization and the four holding partnerships subsequent to the January 2009 reorganization.
Generally, holders of the limited partner interests in the four Holding Partnerships may, up to four times each year, exchange their limited partnership interests (“Partnership Units”) for Blackstone Common Units, on a one-to-one basis, exchanging one Partnership Unit in each of the four Holding Partnerships for one Blackstone Common Unit.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Partnership have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q. The condensed consolidated financial
12
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—Continued
statements, including these notes, are unaudited and exclude some of the disclosures required in audited financial statements. Management believes it has made all necessary adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring items) so that the condensed consolidated financial statements are presented fairly and that estimates made in preparing its condensed consolidated financial statements are reasonable and prudent. The operating results presented for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the entire year. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Partnership, its wholly-owned or majority-owned subsidiaries, the consolidated entities which are considered to be variable interest entities and for which the Partnership is considered the primary beneficiary, and certain partnerships or similar entities which are not considered variable interest entities but in which the general partner is presumed to have control.
All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Restructurings within consolidated CLOs are treated as investment purchases or sales, as applicable, in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
The December 31, 2011 Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition reflects an increase of $506.2 million to reflect the cumulative effect of a reclassification to Redeemable Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities. This amount had previously been classified within Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities but should properly be, and now has been, classified within Redeemable Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities. In addition, the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 reflect an increase to Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Redeemable Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities of $0.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively, with a corresponding decrease to Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities to correctly classify the portion of Net Gains (Losses) from Fund Investment Activities attributable to Redeemable Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities. These immaterial restatements had no impact on Net Income (Loss) Attributable to The Blackstone Group L.P., Net Income (Loss) per Common Unit-Basic or Diluted, or the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts to conform to the current year presentation as follows:
As of June 30, 2012, Blackstone elected to separately present Carried Interest and Incentive Fees in each of the Realized and Unrealized components of Performance Fee Revenue and Performance Fee Compensation in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Previously, these amounts were not separately reported. This presentation had no impact on the respective financial statement captions.
Consolidation
The Partnership consolidates all entities that it controls through a majority voting interest or otherwise, including those Blackstone Funds in which the general partner is presumed to have control. Although the Partnership has a non-controlling interest in the Blackstone Holdings partnerships, the limited partners do not have the right to dissolve the partnerships or have substantive kick out rights or participating rights that would overcome the presumption of control by the Partnership. Accordingly, the Partnership consolidates Blackstone Holdings and records non-controlling interests to reflect the economic interests of the limited partners of Blackstone Holdings.
13
Income (Loss) attributable to Blackstone Holdings, excluding certain costs and expenses borne directly by Blackstone Holdings, is calculated based on the average number of Blackstone Holdings partnership units held by the Founder, other senior managing directors and employees.
In addition, the Partnership consolidates all variable interest entities (“VIE”) in which it is the primary beneficiary. An enterprise is determined to be the primary beneficiary if it holds a controlling financial interest. A controlling financial interest is defined as (a) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The consolidation guidance requires an analysis to (a) determine whether an entity in which the Partnership holds a variable interest is a VIE and (b) whether the Partnership’s involvement, through holding interests directly or indirectly in the entity or contractually through other variable interests (e.g., management and performance related fees), would give it a controlling financial interest. Performance of that analysis requires the exercise of judgment. VIEs qualify for the deferral of the consolidation guidance if all of the following conditions have been met:
Where the VIEs have qualified for the deferral of the current consolidation guidance, the analysis is based on previous consolidation guidance. This guidance requires an analysis to determine (a) whether an entity in which the Partnership holds a variable interest is a variable interest entity and (b) whether the Partnership’s involvement, through holding interests directly or indirectly in the entity or contractually through other variable interests (e.g., management and performance related fees), would be expected to absorb a majority of the variability of the entity. Under both guidelines, the Partnership determines whether it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE at the time it becomes involved with a variable interest entity and reconsiders that conclusion continuously. In evaluating whether the Partnership is the primary beneficiary, Blackstone evaluates its economic interests in the entity held either directly by the Partnership and its affiliates or indirectly through employees. The consolidation analysis can generally be performed qualitatively; however, if it is not readily apparent that the Partnership is not the primary beneficiary, a quantitative analysis may also be performed. Investments and redemptions (either by the Partnership, affiliates of the Partnership or third parties) or amendments to the governing documents of the respective Blackstone Funds could affect an entity’s status as a VIE or the determination of the primary beneficiary. At each reporting date, the Partnership assesses whether it is the primary beneficiary and will consolidate or deconsolidate accordingly.
Assets of consolidated variable interest entities that can only be used to settle obligations of the consolidated VIE and liabilities of a consolidated VIE for which creditors (or beneficial interest holders) do not have recourse to the general credit of Blackstone are presented in a separate section in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
Blackstone’s other disclosures regarding VIEs are discussed in Note 9. “Variable Interest Entities”.
14
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
GAAP establishes a hierarchal disclosure framework which prioritizes and ranks the level of market price observability used in measuring financial instruments at fair value. Market price observability is affected by a number of factors, including the type of financial instrument, the characteristics specific to the financial instrument and the state of the marketplace, including the existence and transparency of transactions between market participants. Financial instruments with readily available quoted prices in active markets generally will have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment used in measuring fair value.
Financial instruments measured and reported at fair value are classified and disclosed based on the observability of inputs used in the determination of fair values, as follows:
Level I — Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical financial instruments as of the reporting date. The type of financial instruments in Level I include listed equities, listed derivatives and mutual funds with quoted prices. The Partnership does not adjust the quoted price for these investments, even in situations where Blackstone holds a large position and a sale could reasonably impact the quoted price.
Level II — Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date, and fair value is determined through the use of models or other valuation methodologies. Financial instruments which are generally included in this category include corporate bonds and loans, government and agency securities, less liquid and restricted equity securities, certain over-the-counter derivatives where the fair value is based on observable inputs, and certain fund of hedge funds and proprietary investments in which Blackstone has the ability to redeem its investment at net asset value at, or within three months of, the reporting date.
Level III — Pricing inputs are unobservable for the financial instruments and includes situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the financial instrument. The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation. Financial instruments that are included in this category generally include general and limited partnership interests in private equity and real estate funds, credit-oriented funds, distressed debt and non-investment grade residual interests in securitizations, corporate bonds and loans held within CLO vehicles, certain over the counter derivatives where the fair value is based on unobservable inputs and certain funds of hedge funds which use net asset value per share to determine fair value in which Blackstone may not have the ability to redeem its investment at net asset value at, or within three months of, the reporting date. Blackstone may not have the ability to redeem its investment at net asset value at, or within three months of, the reporting date if an investee fund manager has the ability to limit the amount of redemptions, and/or the ability to side-pocket investments, irrespective of whether such ability has been exercised. Senior and subordinate notes issued by CLO vehicles may also be classified within Level III of the fair value hierarchy.
In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the determination of which category within the fair value hierarchy is appropriate for any given financial instrument is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Partnership’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the financial instrument.
Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy are recognized at the beginning of the reporting period.
15
Level II Valuation Techniques
Financial instruments classified within Level II of the fair value hierarchy comprise debt instruments, including corporate loans and bonds held by Blackstone’s consolidated CLO vehicles, those held within Blackstone’s Treasury Cash Management Strategies and debt securities sold, not yet purchased and interests in investment funds. Certain equity securities and derivative instruments valued using observable inputs are also classified as Level II.
The valuation techniques used to value financial instruments classified within Level II of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
Debt Instruments and Equity Securities are valued on the basis of prices from an orderly transaction between market participants provided by reputable dealers or pricing services. In determining the value of a particular investment, pricing services may use certain information with respect to transactions in such investments, quotations from dealers, pricing matrices and market transactions in comparable investments and various relationships between investments. The valuation of certain equity securities is based on an observable price for an identical security adjusted for the effect of a restriction.
Investment Funds held by the consolidated Blackstone Funds are valued using net asset value per share as described in Level III Valuation Techniques – Funds of Hedge Funds. Certain investments in investment funds are classified within Level II of the fair value hierarchy as the investment can be redeemed at, or within three months of, the reporting date.
Freestanding Derivatives and Derivative Instruments Designated as Fair Value Hedges are valued using contractual cash flows and observable inputs comprising yield curves, foreign currency rates and credit spreads.
Level III Valuation Techniques
In the absence of observable market prices, Blackstone values its investments using valuation methodologies applied on a consistent basis. For some investments little market activity may exist; management’s determination of fair value is then based on the best information available in the circumstances, and may incorporate management’s own assumptions and involves a significant degree of judgment, taking into consideration a combination of internal and external factors, including the appropriate risk adjustments for non-performance and liquidity risks. Investments for which market prices are not observable include private investments in the equity of operating companies, real estate properties, certain funds of hedge funds and credit-oriented investments.
Private Equity Investments — The fair values of private equity investments are determined by reference to projected net earnings, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), the discounted cash flow method, public market or private transactions, valuations for comparable companies and other measures which, in many cases, are unaudited at the time received. Valuations may be derived by reference to observable valuation measures for comparable companies or transactions (e.g., multiplying a key performance metric of the investee company such as EBITDA by a relevant valuation multiple observed in the range of comparable companies or transactions), adjusted by management for differences between the investment and the referenced comparables, and in some instances by reference to option pricing models or other similar methods. Private equity investments may also be valued at cost for a period of time after an acquisition as the best indicator of fair value.
Real Estate Investments — The fair values of real estate investments are determined by considering projected operating cash flows, sales of comparable assets, if any, and replacement costs among other measures. The methods used to estimate the fair value of real estate investments include the discounted cash flow method
16
and/or capitalization rates (“cap rates”) analysis. Valuations may be derived by reference to observable valuation measures for comparable companies or assets (e.g., multiplying a key performance metric of the investee company or asset, such as EBITDA, by a relevant valuation multiple observed in the range of comparable companies or transactions), adjusted by management for differences between the investment and the referenced comparables, and in some instances by reference to option pricing models or other similar methods. Additionally, where applicable, projected distributable cash flow through debt maturity will also be considered in support of the investment’s carrying value.
Funds of Hedge Funds — Blackstone Funds’ direct investments in funds of hedge funds (“Investee Funds”) are valued at net asset value (“NAV”) per share of the Investee Fund. If the Partnership determines, based on its own due diligence and investment procedures, that NAV per share does not represent fair value, the Partnership will estimate the fair value in good faith and in a manner that it reasonably chooses, in accordance with its valuation policies.
Certain investments of Blackstone and of the consolidated Blackstone funds of hedge funds and credit-oriented funds measure their investments in underlying funds at fair value using NAV per share without adjustment. The terms of the investee’s investment generally provide for minimum holding periods or lock-ups, the institution of gates on redemptions or the suspension of redemptions or an ability to side-pocket investments, at the discretion of the investee’s fund manager, and as a result, investments may not be redeemable at, or within three months of, the reporting date. A side-pocket is used by hedge funds and funds of hedge funds to separate investments that may lack a readily ascertainable value, are illiquid or are subject to liquidity restriction. Redemptions are generally not permitted until the investments within a side pocket are liquidated or it is deemed that the conditions existing at the time that required the investment to be included in the side pocket no longer exist. As the timing of either of these events is uncertain, the timing at which the Partnership may redeem an investment held in a side-pocket cannot be estimated. Investments for which fair value is measured using NAV per share are reflected within the fair value hierarchy based on the observability of pricing inputs as described above. Further disclosure on instruments for which fair value is measured using NAV per share is presented in Note 5. “Net Asset Value as Fair Value”.
Credit-Oriented Investments — The fair values of credit-oriented investments are generally determined on the basis of prices between market participants provided by reputable dealers or pricing services. In some instances, Blackstone may utilize other valuation techniques, including the discounted cash flow method.
Credit-Oriented Liabilities — Credit-oriented liabilities comprise senior and subordinate loans issued by Blackstone’s consolidated CLO vehicles. Such liabilities are valued using a discounted cash flow methodology.
Level III Valuation Process
Investments classified within Level III of the fair value hierarchy are valued on a quarterly basis, taking into consideration any changes in Blackstone’s weighted average cost of capital assumptions, discounted cash flow projections and exit multiple assumptions, as well as any changes in economic and other relevant conditions and valuation models are updated accordingly. The valuation process also includes a review by an independent valuation party, at least annually for all investments, and quarterly for certain investments, to corroborate the values determined by management. The valuations of Blackstone’s investments are reviewed quarterly by a valuation committee which is chaired by Blackstone’s Vice Chairman and includes senior heads of each of Blackstone’s businesses, as well as representatives of legal and finance. Each quarter, the valuations of Blackstone’s investments are also reviewed by the Audit Committee in a meeting attended by the chairman of the valuation committee as well as the senior heads of each of Blackstone’s businesses. The valuations are further tested by comparison to actual sales prices obtained on disposition of the investments.
17
Investments, at Fair Value
The Blackstone Funds are accounted for as investment companies under the Investment Company Guide, and reflect their investments, including majority-owned and controlled investments (the “Portfolio Companies”), at fair value. Blackstone has retained the specialized accounting for the consolidated Blackstone Funds. Thus, such consolidated funds’ investments are reflected in Investments on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses resulting from changes in fair value reflected as a component of Net Gains (Losses) from Fund Investment Activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Fair value is the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e., the exit price).
Blackstone’s principal investments are presented at fair value with unrealized appreciation or depreciation and realized gains and losses recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations within Investment Income (Loss).
For certain instruments, the Partnership has elected the fair value option. Such election is irrevocable and is applied on an investment by investment basis at initial recognition. The Partnership has applied the fair value option for certain loans and receivables and certain investments in private debt and equity securities that otherwise would not have been carried at fair value with gains and losses recorded in net income. Fair valuing these investments is consistent with how the Partnership accounts for its other principal investments. Loans extended to third parties are recorded within Accounts Receivable within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Debt and equity securities for which the fair value option has been elected are recorded within Investments. The methodology for measuring the fair value of such investments is consistent with the methodology applied to private equity, real estate, credit-oriented and funds of hedge funds investments. Changes in the fair value of such instruments are recognized in Investment Income (Loss) in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Interest income on interest bearing loans and receivables and debt securities on which the fair value option has been elected is based on stated coupon rates adjusted for the accretion of purchase discounts and the amortization of purchase premiums. This interest income is recorded within Interest and Dividend Revenue.
In addition, the Partnership has elected the fair value option for the assets and liabilities of CLO vehicles that are consolidated as of January 1, 2010, as a result of the initial adoption of variable interest entity consolidation guidance. The Partnership has also elected the fair value option for CLO vehicles consolidated as a result of the acquisitions of CLO management contracts. The adjustment resulting from the difference between the fair value of assets and liabilities for each of these events is presented as a transition and acquisition adjustment to Appropriated Partners’ Capital. The recognition of the initial difference between the fair value of assets and liabilities of CLO vehicles consolidated as a result of the acquisition of management contracts subsequent to the initial adoption of revised accounting guidance effective January 1, 2010, as an adjustment to Appropriated Partners’ Capital, is currently under review by the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”). Assets of the consolidated CLOs are presented within Investments within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and Liabilities within Loans Payable for the amounts due to unaffiliated third parties and Due to Affiliates for the amounts held by non-consolidated affiliates. The methodology for measuring the fair value of such assets and liabilities is consistent with the methodology applied to private equity, real estate, and credit-oriented investments. Changes in the fair value of consolidated CLO assets and liabilities and related interest, dividend and other income subsequent to adoption and acquisition are presented within Net Gains (Losses) from Fund Investment Activities. Amounts attributable to Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities have a corresponding adjustment to Appropriated Partners’ Capital.
18
Further disclosure on instruments for which the fair value option has been elected is presented in Note 7. “Fair Value Option” to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Security and loan transactions are recorded on a trade date basis.
Equity Method Investments
Investments where the Partnership is deemed to exert significant influence, but not control, are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Partnership’s share of earnings (losses) from equity method investments is included in Investment Income (Loss) in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The carrying amounts of equity method investments are reflected in Investments in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. As the underlying investments of the Partnership’s equity method investments in Blackstone Funds are reported at fair value, the carrying value of the Partnership’s equity method investments represents fair value.
Repurchase and Reverse Repurchase Agreements
Securities purchased under agreement to resell (“reverse repurchase agreements”) and securities sold under agreements to repurchase (“repurchase agreements”), comprising primarily U.S. and non-U.S. government and agency securities, asset-backed securities and corporate debt, represent collateralized financing transactions. Such transactions are recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at their contractual amounts and include accrued interest.
The Partnership manages credit exposure arising from repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements by, in appropriate circumstances, entering into master netting agreements and collateral arrangements with counterparties that provide the Partnership, in the event of a counterparty default, the right to liquidate collateral and the right to offset a counterparty’s rights and obligations.
The Partnership takes possession of securities purchased under reverse repurchase agreements and is permitted to repledge, deliver or otherwise use such securities. The Partnership also pledges its financial instruments to counterparties to collateralize repurchase agreements. Financial instruments pledged that can be repledged, delivered or otherwise used by the counterparty are recorded in Investments on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
Securities Sold, Not Yet Purchased consist of equity and debt securities that the Partnership has borrowed and sold. The Partnership is required to “cover” its short sale in the future by purchasing the security at prevailing market prices and delivering it to the counterparty from which it borrowed the security. The Partnership is exposed to loss in the event that the price at which a security may have to be purchased to cover a short sale exceeds the price at which the borrowed security was sold short.
Securities Sold, Not Yet Purchased are recorded at fair value in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
Derivative Instruments
The Partnership recognizes all derivatives as assets or liabilities on its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at fair value. On the date the Partnership enters into a derivative contract, it designates and documents each derivative contract as one of the following: (a) a hedge of a recognized asset or liability (“fair
19
value hedge”), (b) a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (“cash flow hedge”), (c) a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation, or (d) a derivative instrument not designated as a hedging instrument (“freestanding derivative”). For a fair value hedge, Blackstone records changes in the fair value of the derivative and, to the extent that it is highly effective, changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability attributable to the hedged risk, in current period earnings in General, Administrative and Other in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as hedging instruments caused by factors other than changes in the risk being hedged, which are excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness, are recognized in current period earnings.
The Partnership formally documents at inception its hedge relationships, including identification of the hedging instruments and the hedged items, its risk management objectives, strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction and the Partnership’s evaluation of effectiveness of its hedged transaction. At least monthly, the Partnership also formally assesses whether the derivative it designated in each hedging relationship is expected to be, and has been, highly effective in offsetting changes in estimated fair values or cash flows of the hedged items using either the regression analysis or the dollar offset method. If it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective at hedging the designated exposure, hedge accounting is discontinued. The fair value of the derivative instrument is reflected within Other Assets in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
For freestanding derivative contracts, the Partnership presents changes in fair value in current period earnings. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments held by consolidated Blackstone Funds are reflected in Net Gains (Losses) from Funds Investment Activities or, where derivative instruments are held by the Partnership, within Investment Income (Loss), in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair value of freestanding derivative assets are recorded within Investments and freestanding derivative liabilities are recorded within Accounts Payable, Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
Blackstone’s other disclosures regarding derivative financial instruments are discussed in Note 6. “Derivative Financial Instruments”.
Affiliates
Blackstone considers its Founder, senior managing directors, employees, the Blackstone Funds and the Portfolio Companies to be affiliates.
Distributions
Distributions are reflected in the condensed consolidated financial statements when paid.
Recent Accounting Developments
In April 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) amended existing guidance for agreements to transfer financial assets that both entitle and obligate the transferor to repurchase or redeem the financial assets before their maturity. The amendments removed from the assessment of effective control (a) the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee and (b) the collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to that criterion. The guidance was effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011. Blackstone enters into repurchase agreements that are currently accounted for as collateralized financing transactions. Adoption did not have a material impact on the Partnership’s financial statements.
20
In May 2011, the FASB issued amended guidance on fair value measurements to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The amended guidance specified that the concepts of highest and best use and valuation premise in a fair value measurement are relevant only when measuring the fair value of nonfinancial assets and are not relevant when measuring the fair value of financial assets or of liabilities. The amendments included requirements specific to measuring the fair value of those instruments, such as equity interests used as consideration in a business combination. An entity should measure the fair value of its own equity instrument from the perspective of a market participant that holds the instrument as an asset. With respect to financial instruments that are managed as part of a portfolio, an exception to fair value requirements was provided. That exception permits a reporting entity to measure the fair value of such financial assets and financial liabilities at the price that would be received to sell a net asset position for a particular risk or to transfer a net liability position for a particular risk in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The amendments also clarified that premiums and discounts should only be applied if market participants would do so when pricing the asset or liability. Premiums and discounts related to the size of an entity’s holding (e.g., a blockage factor) rather than as a characteristic of the asset or liability (e.g., a control premium) is not permitted in a fair value measurement.
The guidance also required enhanced disclosures about fair value measurements, including, among other things, (a) for fair value measurements categorized within Level III of the fair value hierarchy, (1) a quantitative disclosure of the unobservable inputs and assumptions used in the measurement, (2) the valuation process used by the reporting entity, and (3) a narrative description of the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in unobservable inputs and the interrelationships between those unobservable inputs, if any, and (b) the categorization by level of the fair value hierarchy for items that are not measured at fair value in the statement of financial position but for which the fair value is required to be disclosed (for example, a financial instrument that is measured at amortized cost in the statement of financial position but for which fair value is disclosed). The guidance also amended disclosure requirements for significant transfers between Level I and Level II and now requires disclosure of all transfers between Levels I and II in the fair value hierarchy.
The amended guidance was effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. As the impact of the guidance is primarily limited to enhanced disclosures, adoption did not have a material impact on the Partnership’s financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued amended guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income. The amendments provided an entity with an option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity was required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. In addition, an entity was required to present on the face of the financial statements reclassification adjustments for items that were reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in the statement(s) where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income were presented. The guidance was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2011 and was to be applied on a retrospective basis. As the amendments are limited to presentation only, adoption did not have a material impact on the Partnership’s financial statements.
In December 2011, the FASB issued a deferral of the effective date for certain disclosures relating to the comprehensive income, specifically with respect to the presentation of reclassifications of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The deferral was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011.
21
In September 2011, the FASB issued enhanced guidance on testing goodwill for impairment. The amended guidance provides an entity with the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to perform the first step of the two-step impairment test by calculating the fair value of the reporting unit and comparing the fair value with the carrying amount of the reporting unit. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, then the entity is required to perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. Under the amended guidance, an entity has the option to bypass the qualitative assessment for any reporting unit in any period and proceed directly to performing the first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test. An entity may resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period. The amended guidance includes examples of events or circumstances that an entity must consider in evaluating whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of reporting units is less than its carrying amount. The amended guidance no longer permits the carry forward of detailed calculations of a reporting unit’s fair value from a prior year. The guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. The amended guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Partnership’s financial statements.
In December 2011, the FASB issued guidance to enhance disclosures about financial instruments and derivative instruments that are either (a) offset or (b) subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement, irrespective of whether they are offset. Under the amended guidance, an entity is required to disclose quantitative information relating to recognized assets and liabilities that are offset or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement, including (a) the gross amounts of those recognized assets and liabilities, (b) the amounts offset to determine the net amount presented in the statement of financial position, and (c) the net amount presented in the statement of financial position. With respect to amounts subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement which are not offset, disclosure is required of (a) the amounts related to recognized financial instruments and other derivative instruments, (b) the amount related to financial collateral (including cash collateral), and (c) the overall net amount after considering amounts that have not been offset. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and interim periods within those annual periods and retrospective application is required. As the amendments are limited to disclosure only, adoption is not expected to have a material impact on the Partnership’s financial statements.
Acquisition of Harbourmaster
On January 5, 2012, Blackstone completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding share capital of Harbourmaster Capital (Holdings) Limited (“Harbourmaster”), an Island of Jersey entity, in accordance with the sale and purchase agreement entered into on October 6, 2011. The fair value of consideration transferred, comprised entirely of cash, was €181.4 million ($232.0 million). Harbourmaster is a European secured bank loan manager based in Dublin, Ireland. Harbourmaster manages various credit products including CLO vehicles.
22
The following is a summary of the estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed for the Harbourmaster acquisition:
Purchase Price — Cash
Fair Value of Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed
Cash
Investments in CLOs
Intangible Assets
Liabilities Assumed
Net Assets Acquired
Harbourmaster’s results from the date of acquisition have been included in the Credit Businesses segment.
The Partnership incurred $2.1 million of acquisition-related costs which were expensed as incurred and are reflected within the General, Administrative and Other in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
The Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 includes the results of Harbourmaster since the date of acquisition, January 5, 2012, through June 30, 2012. Supplemental information on an unaudited pro forma basis, as if the Harbourmaster acquisition had been consummated as of January 1, 2011 is as follows:
Net Income Attributable to The Blackstone Group L.P.
Net Income Per Common Unit — Basic
Net Income Per Common Unit — Diluted
The results for the period from January 1, 2012 to the acquisition date of January 5, 2012 are not material and, as a result, pro forma unaudited supplemental information has not been provided for the 2012 periods as the amounts are materially consistent with the amounts recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.
The unaudited pro forma supplemental information is based on estimates and assumptions, which the Partnership believes are reasonable. These results are not necessarily indicative of the Partnership’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Condition or Statements of Operations in future periods or the results that actually would have been realized had the Partnership and Harbourmaster been a combined entity during the periods presented.
23
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill has been allocated to each of the Partnership’s five segments as follows: Private Equity ($694.5 million), Real Estate ($421.7 million), Hedge Fund Solutions ($172.1 million), Credit Businesses ($346.4 million) and Financial Advisory ($68.9 million).
The carrying value of goodwill was $1.7 billion as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the fair value of the Partnership’s operating segments substantially exceeded their respective carrying values.
Intangible Assets, Net consists of the following:
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets / Contractual Rights
Accumulated Amortization
Amortization expense associated with Blackstone’s intangible assets was $36.7 million and $84.8 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012, respectively, and $41.6 million and $82.4 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively.
Amortization of Intangible Assets held at June 30, 2012 is expected to be $139.3 million, $88.2 million, $83.3 million, $77.1 million, and $72.8 million for each of the years ending December 31, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016, respectively. Blackstone’s intangible assets as of June 30, 2012 are expected to amortize over a weighted-average period of 8.8 years.
Investment
Investments consist of the following:
Investments of Consolidated Blackstone Funds
Blackstone’s Treasury Cash Management Strategies
Other Investments
Blackstone’s share of Investments of Consolidated Blackstone Funds totaled $486.1 million and $449.6 million at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, consideration was given as to whether any individual investment, including derivative instruments, had a fair value which exceeded 5% of Blackstone’s net assets. At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, no investment exceeded the 5% threshold.
24
The following table presents the realized and net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments held by the consolidated Blackstone Funds:
Realized Gains (Losses)
Net Change in Unrealized Gains (Losses)
The following reconciles the Realized and Net Change in Unrealized Gains (Losses) from Blackstone Funds presented above to Other Income (Loss) — Net Gains (Losses) from Fund Investment Activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations:
Realized and Net Change in Unrealized Gains (Losses) from Blackstone Funds
Interest and Dividend Revenue Attributable to Consolidated Blackstone Funds
Other Income — Net Gains (Losses) from Fund Investment Activities
The Partnership recognized net gains related to its equity method investments of $44.0 million and $183.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Blackstone’s equity method investments include its investments in private equity funds, real estate funds, funds of hedge funds and credit-oriented funds and other proprietary investments, which are not consolidated but in which the Partnership exerts significant influence.
Blackstone evaluates each of its equity method investments to determine if any were significant as defined by guidance from the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. As of and for the three months ended June 30, 2012, no individual equity method investment held by Blackstone met the significance criteria. As such, Blackstone is not required to present summarized financial information for any of its equity method investments.
25
The portion of Blackstone’s Treasury cash management strategies included in Investments represents the Partnership’s liquid investments in government, other investment and non-investment grade securities and other investments. These strategies are primarily managed by third-party institutions. The following table presents the realized and net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments held by Blackstone’s Treasury cash management strategies:
Realized Gains
Performance Fees allocated to the general partner in respect of performance of certain Carry Funds, funds of hedge funds and credit-oriented funds were as follows:
Performance Fees, December 31, 2011
Performance Fees Allocated as a Result of Changes in Fund Fair Values
Foreign Exchange Loss
Fund Cash Distributions
Performance Fees, June 30, 2012
Other Investments consist primarily of investment securities held by Blackstone for its own account. The following table presents Blackstone’s realized and net change in unrealized gains (losses) in other investments:
26
A summary of fair value by strategy type alongside the consolidated funds of hedge funds’ remaining unfunded commitments and ability to redeem such investments as of June 30, 2012 is presented below:
Strategy
Diversified Instruments
Credit Driven
Event Driven
Equity
Commodities
Blackstone enters into derivative contracts in order to hedge its interest rate risk exposure against the effects of interest rate changes. Additionally, Blackstone and the Blackstone Funds enter into derivative contracts in the normal course of business to achieve certain other risk management objectives and for general investment purposes. As a result of the use of derivative contracts, Blackstone and the consolidated Blackstone Funds are exposed to the risk that counterparties will fail to fulfill their contractual obligations. To mitigate such
27
counterparty risk, Blackstone and the consolidated Blackstone Funds enter into contracts with certain major financial institutions, all of which have investment grade ratings. Counterparty credit risk is evaluated in determining the fair value of derivative instruments.
Fair Value Hedges
In June 2012, Blackstone removed the fair value designation of its interest rate swaps that were used to hedge a portion of the interest rate risk on the Partnership’s fixed rate borrowings. The impact to the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the period up through the date of de-designation is reflected within “Fair Value Hedges” in the table below. Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps subsequent to the date of de-designation are reflected within Freestanding Derivatives within Interest Rate Contracts in the table below.
Freestanding Derivatives
Freestanding derivatives are instruments that Blackstone and certain of the consolidated Blackstone Funds have entered into as part of their overall risk management and investment strategies. These derivative contracts are not designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes. Such contracts may include foreign exchange contracts, equity swaps, options, futures and other derivative contracts.
The table below summarizes the aggregate notional amount and fair value of the derivative financial instruments. The notional amount represents the absolute value amount of all outstanding derivative contracts.
Interest Rate Swaps
Blackstone — Other
Interest Rate Contracts
Foreign Currency Contracts
Credit Default Swaps
Total
28
The table below summarizes the impact to the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations from derivative financial instruments:
Fair Value Hedges — Interest Rate Swaps
Hedge Ineffectiveness
Excluded from Assessment of Effectiveness
Realized Gain
Net Change in Unrealized Gain (Loss)
Since the inception of the above mentioned hedge designation, Blackstone recognized a $64.2 million increase in the fair value of the hedged borrowing. This basis adjustment will be accreted using the effective interest method through August 15, 2019, the remaining term of the hedged borrowing.
As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Partnership had not designated any derivatives as cash flow hedges or hedges of net investments in foreign operations.
29
The following table summarizes the financial instruments for which the fair value option has been elected:
Loans and Receivables
Assets of Consolidated CLO Vehicles
Corporate Loans
Corporate Bonds
Liabilities of Consolidated CLO Vehicles
Senior Secured Notes
Subordinated Notes
The following table presents the realized and net change in unrealized gains (losses) on financial instruments on which the fair value option was elected:
30
The following table presents information for those financial instruments for which the fair value option was elected:
As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, no Loans and Receivables for which the fair value option was elected were past due or in non-accrual status.
31
The following tables summarize the valuation of the Partnership’s financial assets and liabilities by the fair value hierarchy as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively:
Investments of Consolidated Blackstone Funds (a)
Investment Funds
Equity Securities
Partnership and LLC Interests
Debt Instruments
Freestanding Derivatives — Foreign Currency Contracts
Freestanding Derivatives — Interest Rate Contracts
Total Investments of Consolidated Blackstone Funds
Money Market Funds
Liabilities of Consolidated CLO Vehicles (a)
32
Derivative Instruments Used as Fair Value Hedges
33
The following table summarizes the fair value transfers between Level I and Level II:
Transfers from Level I into Level II (a)
Transfers from Level II into Level I (b)
The following table summarizes the quantitative inputs and assumptions used for items categorized in Level III of the fair value hierarchy as of June 30, 2012. The disclosure below excludes financial instruments for which fair value is based on unobservable but non-quantitative inputs. Such items include financial instruments for which the determination of fair value is based on prices from prior transactions or third party pricing information without adjustment and financial instruments for which fair value is determined by net asset value.
Valuation
Techniques
Unobservable
Inputs
Financial Assets
Discounted Cash Flows
Discount Rate
Revenue CAGR
Exit Multiple
1.6% - 83.4%
5.8x - 17.0x
Market Comparable Companies
6.5x - 8.3x
Exit Capitalization Rate
-5.6% - 62.0%
4.5x - 14.8x
1.0% - 9.5%
Default Rate
Recovery Rate
Recovery Lag
Pre-payment Rate Reinvestment Rate
7.5%
2.0%
70.0%
12 months
20.0%
3.2%
EBITDA Multiple
Liquidity Discount
1.0% - 25.0%
Financial Liabilities
CLOs
Pre-payment Rate
Reinvestment Rate
30.0% - 70.0%
5.0% - 20.0%
1.1% - 80.0%
34
The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the assets and obligations of consolidated CLO vehicles are discount rates, default rates, recovery rates, recovery lag, pre-payment rates and reinvestment rates. Increases (decreases) in any of the discount rates, default rates, recovery lag and pre-payment rates in isolation would result in a lower (higher) fair value measurement. Increases (decreases) in any of the recovery rates and reinvestment rates in isolation would result in a higher (lower) fair value measurement. Generally, a change in the assumption used for default rates may be accompanied by a directionally similar change in the assumption used for recovery lag and a directionally opposite change in the assumption used for recovery rates and pre-payment rates.
The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of equity securities, partnership and LLC interests, debt instruments, assets of consolidated CLO vehicles and loans and receivables are discount rates, exit capitalization rates, exit multiples, book value multiples, EBITDA multiples, liquidity discount and revenue compound annual growth rates. Increases (decreases) in any of discount rates and exit capitalization rates in isolation can result in a lower (higher) fair value measurement. Increases (decreases) in any of exit multiples, book value mulitples and revenue compound annual growth rates in isolation can result in a higher (lower) fair value measurement.
Since December 31, 2011, there have been no changes in valuation techniques within Level II and Level III that have had a material impact on the valuation of financial instruments.
35
The following tables summarize the changes in financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value for which the Partnership has used Level III inputs to determine fair value and does not include gains or losses that were reported in Level III in prior years or for instruments that were transferred out of Level III prior to the end of the current reporting period. Total realized and unrealized gains and losses recorded for Level III investments are reported in Investment Income (Loss) and Net Gains from Fund Investment Activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Balance, Beginning of Period
Transfer In Due to Consolidation and Acquisition (a)
Transfer Out Due to Deconsolidation
Transfer In to LevelIII (b)
Transfer Out of LevelIII (b)
Purchases
Sales
Settlements
Realized Gains (Losses), Net
Changes in Unrealized Gains (Losses) Included in Earnings Related to Investments Still Held at the Reporting Date
Balance, End of Period
36
Transfer In to Level III (b)
Transfer Out of Level III (b)
Balance, End of
Period
37
Issuances
Changes in Unrealized Gains (Losses) Included in Earnings Related to Liabilities Still Held at the Reporting Date
38
Pursuant to GAAP consolidation guidance, the Partnership consolidates certain VIEs in which it is determined that the Partnership is the primary beneficiary either directly or indirectly, through a consolidated entity or affiliate. VIEs include certain private equity, real estate, credit-oriented or funds of hedge funds entities and CLO vehicles. The purpose of such VIEs is to provide strategy specific investment opportunities for investors in exchange for management and performance based fees. The investment strategies of the Blackstone Funds differ by product; however, the fundamental risks of the Blackstone Funds have similar characteristics, including loss of invested capital and loss of management fees and performance based fees. In Blackstone’s role as general partner or investment adviser, it generally considers itself the sponsor of the applicable Blackstone Fund. The Partnership does not provide performance guarantees and has no other financial obligation to provide funding to consolidated VIEs other than its own capital commitments.
The assets of consolidated variable interest entities may only be used to settle obligations of these consolidated Blackstone Funds. In addition, there is no recourse to the Partnership for the consolidated VIEs’ liabilities including the liabilities of the consolidated CLO vehicles.
The Partnership holds variable interests in certain VIEs which are not consolidated as it is determined that the Partnership is not the primary beneficiary. The Partnership’s involvement with such entities is in the form of direct equity interests and fee arrangements. The maximum exposure to loss represents the loss of assets recognized by Blackstone relating to non-consolidated entities, any amounts due to non-consolidated entities and any clawback obligation relating to previously distributed Carried Interest. The assets and liabilities recognized in the Partnership’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition related to the Partnership’s interest in these non-consolidated VIEs and the Partnership’s maximum exposure to loss relating to non-consolidated VIEs were as follows:
Receivables
Total VIE Assets
VIE Liabilities
Potential Clawback Obligation
Maximum Exposure to Loss
At June 30, 2012, the Partnership received securities, primarily U.S. and non-U.S. government and agency securities, asset-backed securities and corporate debt, with a fair value of $88.1 million and cash as collateral for reverse repurchase agreements that could be repledged, delivered or otherwise used. Securities with a fair value
39
of $88.1 million were repledged, delivered or used to settle Securities Sold, Not Yet Purchased. The Partnership also pledged securities with a carrying value of $115.4 million and cash to collateralize its repurchase agreements. Such securities can be repledged, delivered or otherwise used by the counterparty.
On July 13, 2012, an indirect subsidiary of Blackstone entered into an amendment to the $1.02 billion revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent. The amendment increased the borrowing capacity from $1.02 billion to $1.1 billion and extended the maturity date of the Credit Facility from April 8, 2016 to July 13, 2017. As of June 30, 2012, Blackstone had no outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility.
The carrying value and fair value of the Blackstone issued notes as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were:
Blackstone Issued 5.875%, $400 Million Par, Notes Due 3/15/2021
Blackstone Issued 6.625%, $600 Million Par, Notes Due 8/15/2019
Included within Loans Payable and Due to Affiliates are amounts due to holders of debt securities issued by Blackstone’s consolidated CLO vehicles. At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Partnership’s borrowings through consolidated CLO vehicles consisted of the following:
Included within Senior Secured Notes and Subordinated Notes as of June 30, 2012 are amounts due to non-consolidated affiliates of $22.0 million and $317.2 million, respectively. The fair value of Senior Secured and Subordinated Notes as of June 30, 2012 was $10.5 billion and $701.6 million, respectively, of which $15.7 million and $191.1 million represents the amounts due to affiliates.
Included within Senior Secured Notes and Subordinated Notes as of December 31, 2011 are amounts due to non-consolidated affiliates of $101.8 million and $323.6 million, respectively. The fair value of Senior Secured and Subordinated Notes as of December 31, 2011 was $7.4 billion and $630.2 million, respectively, of which $86.9 million and $205.4 million represents the amounts due to affiliates.
40
The Loans Payable of the consolidated CLO vehicles are collateralized by assets held by each respective CLO vehicle and assets of one vehicle may not be used to satisfy the liabilities of another. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the fair value of the consolidated CLO assets was $12.5 billion and $8.7 billion, respectively. This collateral consisted of Cash, Corporate Loans, Corporate Bonds and other securities.
Scheduled principal payments for borrowings as of June 30, 2012 were as follows:
2012
2013
2014
2015
Thereafter
Blackstone’s effective tax rate was 30.5% and 25.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and 13.5% and 28.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Blackstone’s income tax provision was an expense of $41.3 million and an expense of $64.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and an expense of $80.1 million and an expense of $103.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Blackstone’s effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was substantially due to the following: (a) certain corporate subsidiaries are subject to federal, state, local and foreign income taxes as applicable and other subsidiaries are subject to New York City unincorporated business taxes, and (b) a portion of compensation charges are not deductible for tax purposes.
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per common unit for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011 was calculated as follows:
Basic Net Income (Loss) Per Common Unit:
Weighted-Average Common Units Outstanding
Net Income (Loss) Per Common Unit
Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Common Unit:
Weighted-Average Unvested Deferred Restricted Common Units
Weighted-Average Diluted Common Units Outstanding
Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Common Unit
41
The following table summarizes the anti-dilutive securities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
Weighted-Average Blackstone Holdings Partnership Units
Unit Repurchase Program
In January 2008, Blackstone announced that the Board of Directors of its general partner, Blackstone Group Management L.L.C., had authorized the repurchase by Blackstone of up to $500 million of Blackstone Common Units and Blackstone Holdings Partnership Units. Under this unit repurchase program, units may be repurchased from time to time in open market transactions, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. The timing and the actual number of Blackstone Common Units and Blackstone Holdings Partnership Units repurchased will depend on a variety of factors, including legal requirements, price and economic and market conditions. This unit repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time and does not have a specified expiration date.
During the six months ended June 30, 2012, no units were repurchased. As of June 30, 2012, the amount remaining available for repurchases under this program was $335.8 million.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, Blackstone repurchased 116,270 vested Blackstone Holdings Partnership Units as part of the unit repurchase program for a total fair value of $2.1 million.
The Partnership has granted equity-based compensation awards to Blackstone’s senior managing directors, non-partner professionals, non-professionals and selected external advisors under the Partnership’s 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Plan”), the majority of which to date were granted in connection with the IPO. The Equity Plan allows for the granting of options, unit appreciation rights or other unit-based awards (units, restricted units, restricted common units, deferred restricted common units, phantom restricted common units or other unit-based awards based in whole or in part on the fair value of the Blackstone Common Units or Blackstone Holdings Partnership Units) which may contain certain service or performance requirements. As of January 1, 2012, the Partnership had the ability to grant 162,195,378 units under the Equity Plan.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Partnership recorded compensation expense of $244.6 million and $467.0 million, respectively, in relation to its equity-based awards with corresponding tax benefits of $7.2 million and $12.7 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Partnership recorded compensation expense of $408.6 million and $834.9 million, respectively, in relation to its equity-based awards with corresponding tax benefits of $4.5 million and $8.7 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2012, there was $2.2 billion of estimated unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested awards. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.9 years.
Total vested and unvested outstanding units, including Blackstone Common Units, Blackstone Holdings Partnership Units and deferred restricted common units, were 1,128,718,375 as of June 30, 2012. Total outstanding unvested phantom units were 221,356 as of June 30, 2012.
42
A summary of the status of the Partnership’s unvested equity-based awards as of June 30, 2012 and a summary of changes during the period January 1, 2012 through June 30, 2012 is presented below:
Unvested Units
Balance, December 31, 2011
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Balance, June 30, 2012
Units Expected to Vest
The following unvested units, after expected forfeitures, as of June 30, 2012, are expected to vest:
Blackstone Holdings Partnership Units
Deferred Restricted Blackstone Common Units and Options
Total Equity-Based Awards
Phantom Units
Affiliate Receivables and Payables
As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, Due from Affiliates and Due to Affiliates comprised the following:
Accrual for Potential Clawback of Previously Distributed Carried Interest
Primarily Interest Bearing Advances Made on Behalf of Certain Non-Controlling Interest Holders and Blackstone Employees for Investments in Blackstone Funds
Amounts Due from Portfolio Companies and Funds
Investments Redeemed in Non-Consolidated Funds of Funds
Management and Performance Fees Due from Non-Consolidated Funds of Funds
Payments Made on Behalf of Non-Consolidated Entities
Advances Made to Certain Non-Controlling Interest Holders and Blackstone Employees
43
Due to Certain Non-Controlling Interest Holders in Connection with the Tax Receivable Agreements
Accrual for Potential Repayment of Previously Received Performance Fees
Due to Note-Holders of Consolidated CLO Vehicles
Distributions Received on Behalf of Certain Non-Controlling Interest Holders and Blackstone Employees
Payable to Affiliates for Consolidated Funds in Liquidation
Distributions Received on Behalf of Blackstone Entities
Payments Made by Non-Consolidated Entities
Interests of the Founder, Senior Managing Directors and Employees
The founder, senior managing directors and employees invest on a discretionary basis in the Blackstone Funds both directly and through consolidated entities. Their investments may be subject to preferential management fee and performance fee arrangements. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the founder’s, other senior managing directors’ and employees’ investments aggregated $782.3 million and $715.5 million, respectively, and the founder’s, other senior managing directors’ and employees’ share of the Net Income Attributable to Redeemable Non-Controlling and Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities aggregated $9.9 million and $61.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $43.3 million and $131.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Management and Advisory Fees earned from affiliates totaled $56.1 million and $118.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Management and Advisory Fees earned from affiliates totaled $104.1 million and $189.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Fees relate primarily to transaction and monitoring fees which are made in the ordinary course of business and under terms that would have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties.
Loans to Affiliates
Loans to affiliates consist of interest-bearing advances to certain Blackstone individuals to finance their investments in certain Blackstone Funds. These loans earn interest at Blackstone’s cost of borrowing and such interest totaled $1.0 million and $0.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $2.3 million and $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. No such loans to any director or executive officer of Blackstone have been made or were outstanding since March 22, 2007, the date of Blackstone’s initial filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of a registration statement relating to its initial public offering.
Contingent Repayment Guarantee
Blackstone and its personnel who have received Carried Interest distributions have guaranteed payment on a several basis (subject to a cap) to the Carry Funds of any clawback obligation with respect to the excess Carried Interest allocated to the general partners of such funds and indirectly received thereby to the extent that either
44
Blackstone or its personnel fails to fulfill its clawback obligation, if any. The Accrual for Possible Repayment of Previously Received Performance Fees represents amounts previously paid to Blackstone Holdings and non-controlling interest holders that would need to be repaid to the Blackstone Funds if the Carry Funds were to be liquidated based on the fair value of their underlying investments as of June 30, 2012. See Note 16. “Commitments and Contingencies — Contingencies — Contingent Obligations (Clawback)”.
Aircraft and Other Services
In the normal course of business, Blackstone personnel have made use of aircraft owned as personal assets by Stephen A. Schwarzman (“Personal Aircraft”). In addition, on occasion, Mr. Schwarzman and his family have made use of an aircraft in which Blackstone owns a fractional interest, as well as other assets of Blackstone. Mr. Schwarzman paid for his purchases of the aircraft himself and bears all operating, personnel and maintenance costs associated with their operation. In addition, Mr. Schwarzman is charged for his and his family’s personal use of Blackstone assets based on market rates and usage. Payment by Blackstone for the use of the Personal Aircraft by other Blackstone employees are made at market rates. Personal use of Blackstone resources are also reimbursed to Blackstone at market rates. The transactions described herein are not material to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Tax Receivable Agreements
Blackstone used a portion of the proceeds from the IPO and the sale of non-voting common units to Beijing Wonderful Investments to purchase interests in the predecessor businesses from the predecessor owners. In addition, holders of Blackstone Holdings Partnership Units may exchange their Blackstone Holdings Partnership Units for Blackstone Common Units on a one-for-one basis. The purchase and subsequent exchanges are expected to result in increases in the tax basis of the tangible and intangible assets of Blackstone Holdings and therefore reduce the amount of tax that Blackstone’s wholly-owned subsidiaries would otherwise be required to pay in the future.
One of the subsidiaries of the Partnership which is a corporate taxpayer has entered into tax receivable agreements with each of the predecessor owners and additional tax receivable agreements have been executed, and will continue to be executed, with newly-admitted senior managing directors and others who acquire Blackstone Holdings Partnership Units. The agreements provide for the payment by the corporate taxpayer to such owners of 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax that the corporate taxpayers actually realize as a result of the aforementioned increases in tax basis and of certain other tax benefits related to entering into these tax receivable agreements. For purposes of the tax receivable agreements, cash savings in income tax will be computed by comparing the actual income tax liability of the corporate taxpayers to the amount of such taxes that the corporate taxpayers would have been required to pay had there been no increase to the tax basis of the tangible and intangible assets of Blackstone Holdings as a result of the exchanges and had the corporate taxpayers not entered into the tax receivable agreements.
Assuming no material changes in the relevant tax law and that the corporate taxpayers earn sufficient taxable income to realize the full tax benefit of the increased amortization of the assets, the expected future payments under the tax receivable agreements (which are taxable to the recipients) will aggregate $1.2 billion over the next 15 years. The after-tax net present value of these estimated payments totals $357.9 million assuming a 15% discount rate and using Blackstone’s most recent projections relating to the estimated timing of the benefit to be received. Future payments under the tax receivable agreements in respect of subsequent
45
exchanges would be in addition to these amounts. The payments under the tax receivable agreements are not conditioned upon continued ownership of Blackstone equity interests by the pre-IPO owners and the others mentioned above.
Blackstone does business with and on behalf of some of its Portfolio Companies; all such arrangements are on a negotiated basis.
Commitments
Investment Commitments
Blackstone had $1.3 billion of investment commitments as of June 30, 2012 representing general partner capital funding commitments to the Blackstone Funds, limited partner capital funding to other funds and Blackstone principal investment commitments. The consolidated Blackstone Funds had signed investment commitments of $53.2 million as of June 30, 2012 which includes $30.3 million of signed investment commitments for portfolio company acquisitions in the process of closing.
Contingencies
Guarantees
Certain of Blackstone’s consolidated real estate funds guarantee payments to third parties in connection with the on-going business activities and/or acquisitions of their Portfolio Companies. There is no direct recourse to the Partnership to fulfill such obligations. To the extent that underlying funds are required to fulfill guarantee obligations, the Partnership’s invested capital in such funds is at risk. Total investments at risk in respect of guarantees extended by consolidated real estate funds was $4.9 million as of June 30, 2012.
On March 28, 2012, the Blackstone Holdings Partnerships entered into a guaranty agreement with a lending institution in which the Holdings Partnerships guarantee certain loans held by employees for investment in Blackstone funds. The amount guaranteed as of June 30, 2012 was $41.6 million.
Litigation
From time to time, Blackstone is named as a defendant in legal actions relating to transactions conducted in the ordinary course of business. Although there can be no assurance of the outcome of such legal actions, in the opinion of management, Blackstone does not have a potential liability related to any current legal proceeding or claim that would individually or in the aggregate materially affect its results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Contingent Obligations (Clawback)
Carried Interest is subject to clawback to the extent that the Carried Interest received to date exceeds the amount due to Blackstone based on cumulative results. The actual clawback liability, however, does not become realized until the end of a fund’s life except for Blackstone’s real estate funds which may have an interim clawback liability come due after a realized loss is incurred, depending on the fund. The lives of the carry funds with a potential clawback obligation, including available contemplated extensions, are currently anticipated to expire at various points beginning toward the end of 2012 and extending through 2018. Further extensions of such terms may be implemented under given circumstances.
46
For financial reporting purposes, the general partners have recorded a liability for potential clawback obligations to the limited partners of some of the carry funds due to changes in the unrealized value of a fund’s remaining investments and where the fund’s general partner has previously received Carried Interest distributions with respect to such fund’s realized investments.
The following table presents the clawback obligations by segment:
Segment
Private Equity
Real Estate
Credit Businesses
A portion of the Carried Interest paid to current and former Blackstone personnel is held in segregated accounts in the event of a cash clawback obligation. These segregated accounts are not included in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of the Partnership, except to the extent a portion of the assets held in the segregated accounts may be allocated to a consolidated Blackstone fund of hedge funds. At June 30, 2012, $412.1 million was held in segregated accounts for the purpose of meeting any clawback obligations of current and former personnel if such payments are required.
Blackstone transacts its primary business in the United States and substantially all of its revenues are generated domestically.
Blackstone conducts its alternative asset management and financial advisory businesses through five segments:
Private Equity — Blackstone’s Private Equity segment comprises its management of private equity funds and certain multi-asset class investment funds.
Real Estate — Blackstone’s Real Estate segment primarily comprises its management of general opportunistic real estate funds and internationally focused opportunistic real estate funds. In addition, the segment has debt investment funds targeting non-controlling real estate debt-related investment opportunities in the public and private markets, primarily in the United States and Europe.
Hedge Fund Solutions — Blackstone’s Hedge Fund Solutions segment is comprised of Blackstone Alternative Asset Management (“BAAM”), an institutional solutions provider utilizing hedge funds across a variety of strategies.
Credit Businesses — Blackstone’s Credit Businesses segment is comprised principally of GSO and manages credit-oriented funds, CLOs, credit-focused separately managed accounts and publicly registered debt-focused investment companies.
Financial Advisory — Blackstone’s Financial Advisory segment comprises its financial advisory services, restructuring and reorganization advisory services and Park Hill Group, which provides fund placement services for alternative investment funds.
47
These business segments are differentiated by their various sources of income. The Private Equity, Real Estate, Hedge Fund Solutions and Credit Businesses segments primarily earn their income from management fees and investment returns on assets under management, while the Financial Advisory segment primarily earns its income from fees related to investment banking services and advice and fund placement services.
Blackstone uses Economic Income (“EI”) as a key measure of value creation, a benchmark of its performance and in making resource deployment and compensation decisions across its five segments. EI represents segment net income before taxes excluding transaction-related charges. Transaction-related charges arise from Blackstone’s IPO and long-term retention programs outside of annual deferred compensation and other corporate actions, including acquisitions. Transaction-related charges include equity-based compensation charges, the amortization of intangible assets and contingent consideration associated with acquisitions. EI presents revenues and expenses on a basis that deconsolidates the investment funds Blackstone manages. Prior to June 30, 2012, EI had been called Economic Net Income. The renaming of this measure did not change any of the previously reported amounts. Economic Net Income (“ENI”) now represents EI adjusted to include current period taxes. Taxes represent the current tax provision (benefit) calculated on Income (Loss) Before Provision for Taxes.
Management makes operating decisions and assesses the performance of each of Blackstone’s business segments based on financial and operating metrics and data that is presented without the consolidation of any of the Blackstone Funds that are consolidated into the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Consequently, all segment data excludes the assets, liabilities and operating results related to the Blackstone Funds.
48
The following table presents the financial data for Blackstone’s five segments as of and for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
Segment Revenues
Base Management Fees
Advisory Fees
Transaction and Other Fees, Net
Management Fee Offsets
Total Management and Advisory Fees, Net
Total Investment Income
Compensation and Benefits
Compensation
Other Operating Expenses
Economic Income (Loss)
49
Economic Income
50
The following table reconciles the Total Segments to Blackstone’s Income (Loss) Before Provision for Taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
Other Income
Fund Management Fees and Performance Fees Eliminated in Consolidation
Fund Expenses Added in Consolidation
Non-Controlling Interests in Income (Loss) of Consolidated Entities
Transaction-Related Other Income
Total Consolidation Adjustments and Reconciling Items
Adjustments
IPO and Acquisition-Related Charges
Income Before Provision (Benefit) for Taxes
51
The following table presents financial data for Blackstone’s five segments for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
Total Management and Advisory Fees
Segment Assets as of June 30, 2012
52
Investment Income
53
The following table reconciles the Total Segments to Blackstone’s Income (Loss) Before Provision for Taxes and Total Assets as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
Transactional Other Income
Income (Loss) Before Provision for Taxes
On July 13, 2012, an indirect subsidiary of Blackstone amended its revolving credit facility. The amendment is described in Note 11. “Borrowings.”
54
Unaudited Consolidating Statements of Financial Condition
55
Unaudited Consolidating Statements of Financial Condition-(Continued)
Blackstone Distressed Securities Fund L.P.
Blackstone Market Opportunities Fund L.P.
Blackstone Strategic Alliance Fund L.P.
Blackstone Strategic Alliance Fund II L.P.
Blackstone Strategic Equity Fund L.P.
Blackstone Value Recovery Fund L.P.
Blackstone/GSO Secured Trust Ltd
56
BTD CP Holdings, LP
GSO Legacy Associates II LLC
GSO Legacy Associates LLC
Shanghai Blackstone Equity Investment Partnership L.P.
Private equity side-by-side investment vehicles
Real estate side-by-side investment vehicles
Mezzanine side-by-side investment vehicles
Collateralized loan obligation vehicles
57
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with The Blackstone Group L.P.’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Our Business
Blackstone is one of the largest independent managers of private capital in the world. We also provide a wide range of financial advisory services, including financial advisory, restructuring and reorganization advisory and fund placement services.
Our business is organized into five business segments:
Private Equity. We are a world leader in private equity investing, having managed six general private equity funds, as well as two sector focused funds and a regionally focused fund, since we established this business in 1987. We refer to these funds collectively as our Blackstone Capital Partners (“BCP”) funds. We also manage certain multi-asset class investment funds. Through our private equity funds we pursue transactions throughout the world, including leveraged buyout acquisitions of seasoned companies, transactions involving growth equity or start-up businesses in established industries, minority investments, corporate partnerships, distressed debt, structured securities and industry consolidations, in all cases in strictly friendly transactions.
Real Estate. We are a world leader in real estate investing since launching our first real estate fund in 1994. We have managed or continue to manage seven global opportunistic real estate funds, three European focused opportunistic real estate funds, a number of real estate debt investment funds and a Bank of America Merrill Lynch Asia real estate platform. Our real estate opportunity funds are diversified geographically and have made significant investments in lodging, major urban office buildings, shopping centers and a variety of real estate operating companies. Our debt investment funds target high yield real estate debt related investment opportunities in the public and private markets, primarily in the United States and Europe. We refer to our real estate opportunistic funds as our Blackstone Real Estate Partners (“BREP”) funds and our real estate debt investment funds as our “BREDS” funds.
Hedge Fund Solutions. Blackstone’s Hedge Fund Solutions segment is comprised principally of Blackstone Alternative Asset Management (“BAAM”). BAAM was organized in 1990 and has developed into a leading institutional solutions provider utilizing hedge funds across a wide variety of strategies. BAAM is the world’s largest discretionary allocator to hedge funds.
Credit Businesses. Our Credit Businesses segment is comprised principally of GSO Capital Partners LP (“GSO”). GSO manages a variety of credit-oriented funds including senior credit-oriented funds, distressed debt funds, mezzanine funds, general credit-oriented funds and collateralized loan obligation (“CLO”) vehicles. GSO is a world leader in credit-oriented products.
Financial Advisory. Our Financial Advisory segment serves a diverse and global group of clients with financial advisory services, restructuring and reorganization advisory services and fund placement services for alternative investment funds.
We generate revenue from fees earned pursuant to contractual arrangements with funds, fund investors and fund portfolio companies (including management, transaction and monitoring fees), and from financial advisory services, restructuring and reorganization advisory services and fund placement services for alternative investment funds. We invest in the funds we manage and, in most cases, receive a preferred allocation of income
(i.e., a carried interest) or an incentive fee from an investment fund in the event that specified cumulative investment returns are achieved. The composition of our revenues will vary based on market conditions and the
58
cyclicality of the different businesses in which we operate. Net investment gains and investment income generated by the Blackstone Funds, principally private equity and real estate funds, are driven by value created by our operating and strategic initiatives as well as overall market conditions. Our funds initially record fund investments at cost and then such investments are subsequently recorded at fair value. Fair values are affected by changes in the fundamentals of the portfolio company, the portfolio company’s industry, the overall economy and other market conditions.
Business Environment
Following a generally positive first quarter for global markets, equity indices declined and volatility increased, driven by increased caution around economic growth and the European sovereign debt situation. The MSCI World index declined 6% and the S&P 500 was down 3%. Credit indices were more mixed, with high grade prices up, and high yield flat-to-down. High yield spreads widened modestly by 40 basis points during the quarter. The Euro weakened against virtually all major currencies. Capital markets activity was mixed, although capital flows into equity mutual funds remain highly challenged, with fourteen straight months of outflows from domestic funds. M&A activity also declined.
Monetary policy remained accommodative throughout much of the world, and several central banks further eased policy late in the quarter as output slowed. In the U.S., unemployment remains persistently high despite record low interest rate levels. Investors are becoming increasingly concerned about policy risks in the second half of the year, and the upcoming U.S. “fiscal cliff.”
Despite intensified concerns around Europe starting in the month of May, financing conditions for U.S. leveraged buyouts remained generally favorable, particularly for moderately sized deals by seasoned issuers. Defaults remain at historic lows while spreads continue to be above mid-cycle norms, creating an attractive cost of financing for LBO-related issuance.
During the quarter, commercial real estate performance metrics remained healthy. The office sector continues to see improvements in leasing velocity, led primarily by demand from tech and energy tenants. National vacancy levels have declined 30 basis points to 15.7%, falling below 16% for the first time since 2009. The retail sector continues to benefit from favorable trends in tenant sales, combined with severely constrained new supply (particularly for regional malls). Overall vacancy for the retail sector fell to 13.0% during the second quarter. The industrial sector reported an eighth consecutive quarter of positive absorption, and availability currently stands at 13.2%. Trends within the U.S. hotel market continue to improve with RevPAR (“Revenue per Available Room”) growing 7.9% during the second quarter of 2012.
Blackstone’s businesses are materially affected by conditions in the financial markets and economic conditions in the U.S., Western Europe, Asia and, to a lesser extent, elsewhere in the world.
Key Financial Measures and Indicators
Our key financial measures and indicators are discussed below.
Revenues primarily consist of management and advisory fees, performance fees, investment income, interest and dividend revenue and other. Please refer to “Part I. Item 1. Business — Incentive Arrangements / Fee Structure” and “Part I. Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies — Revenue Recognition” in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding the manner in which Base Management Fees and Performance Fees are generated.
Management and Advisory Fees — Management and Advisory Fees are comprised of management fees, including base management fees, transaction and other fees, management fee reductions and offsets, and advisory fees.
59
The Partnership earns base management fees from limited partners of funds in each of its managed funds, at a fixed percentage of assets under management, net asset value, total assets, committed capital or invested capital, or in some cases, a fixed fee. Base management fees are based on contractual terms specified in the underlying investment advisory agreements.
Transaction and other fees (including monitoring fees) are fees charged directly to funds and portfolio companies. The investment advisory agreements generally require that the investment adviser reduce the amount of management fees payable by the limited partners to the Partnership (“management fee reductions”) by an amount equal to a portion of the transaction and other fees directly paid to the Partnership by the portfolio companies. The amount of the reduction varies by fund, the type of fee paid by the portfolio company and the previously incurred expenses of the fund.
Management fee offsets are reductions to management fees payable by our limited partners, which are granted based on the amount they reimburse Blackstone for placement fees.
Advisory fees consist of advisory retainer and transaction-based fee arrangements related to merger, acquisition, restructuring and divestiture activities and fund placement services for alternative investment funds. Advisory retainer fees are recognized when services for the transactions are complete, in accordance with terms set forth in individual agreements. Transaction-based fees are recognized when (a) there is evidence of an arrangement with a client, (b) agreed upon services have been provided, (c) fees are fixed or determinable and (d) collection is reasonably assured. Fund placement fees are recognized as earned upon the acceptance by a fund of capital or capital commitments.
Accrued but unpaid Management and Advisory Fees, net of management fee reductions and management fee offsets, as of the reporting date, are included in Accounts Receivable or Due From Affiliates in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
Performance Fees — Performance Fees earned on the performance of Blackstone’s hedge fund structures (“Incentive Fees”) are recognized based on fund performance during the period, subject to the achievement of minimum return levels, or high water marks, in accordance with the respective terms set out in each hedge fund’s governing agreements. Accrued but unpaid Incentive Fees charged directly to investors in Blackstone’s offshore hedge funds as of the reporting date are recorded within Due from Affiliates in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Incentive fees arising on Blackstone’s onshore hedge funds are allocated to the general partner. Accrued but unpaid Incentive Fees on onshore funds as of the reporting date are reflected in Investments in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Incentive Fees are realized at the end of a measurement period, typically annually. Once realized, such fees are not subject to clawback.
In certain fund structures, specifically in private equity, real estate and certain credit-oriented funds (“Carry Funds”), performance fees (“Carried Interest”) are allocated to the general partner based on cumulative fund performance to date, subject to a preferred return to limited partners. At the end of each reporting period, the Partnership calculates the Carried Interest that would be due to the Partnership for each fund, pursuant to the fund agreements, as if the fair value of the underlying investments were realized as of such date, irrespective of whether such amounts have been realized. As the fair value of underlying investments varies between reporting periods, it is necessary to make adjustments to amounts recorded as Carried Interest to reflect either (a) positive performance resulting in an increase in the Carried Interest allocated to the general partner or (b) negative performance that would cause the amount due to the Partnership to be less than the amount previously recognized as revenue, resulting in a negative adjustment to Carried Interest allocated to the general partner. In each scenario, it is necessary to calculate the Carried Interest on cumulative results compared to the Carried Interest recorded to date and make the required positive or negative adjustments. The Partnership ceases to record negative Carried Interest allocations once previously recognized Carried Interest allocations for such fund have been fully reversed. The Partnership is not obligated to pay guaranteed returns or hurdles, and therefore, cannot have negative Carried Interest over the life of a fund. Accrued but unpaid Carried Interest as of the reporting date is reflected in Investments in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
60
Carried Interest is realized when an underlying investment is profitably disposed of and the fund’s cumulative returns are in excess of the preferred return. Incentive fees earned on hedge fund structures are realized at the end of each fund’s measurement period.
Carried Interest is subject to clawback to the extent that the Carried Interest actually distributed to date exceeds the amount due to Blackstone based on cumulative results. As such, the accrual for potential repayment of previously received performance fees, which is a component of Due to Affiliates, represents all amounts previously distributed to Blackstone Holdings and non-controlling interest holders that would need to be repaid to the Blackstone Funds if the Blackstone Carry Funds were to be liquidated based on the current fair value of the underlying funds’ investments as of the reporting date. Generally, the actual clawback liability does not become realized until the end of a fund’s life or one year after a realized loss is incurred, depending on the terms of the fund.
Investment Income (Loss) — Investment Income (Loss) represents the unrealized and realized gains and losses on the Partnership’s principal investments, including its investments in Blackstone Funds that are not consolidated, its equity method investments, and other principal investments. Investment Income (Loss) is realized when the Partnership redeems all or a portion of its investment or when the Partnership receives cash income, such as dividends or distributions, from its non-consolidated funds. Unrealized Investment Income (Loss) results from changes in the fair value of the underlying investment as well as the reversal of unrealized gain (loss) at the time an investment is realized.
Interest and Dividend Revenue — Interest and Dividend Revenue comprises primarily interest and dividend income earned on principal investments held by Blackstone.
Other Revenue — Other Revenue consists of foreign exchange gains and losses arising on transactions denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars and other revenues.
Compensation and Benefits — Compensation — Compensation and Benefits consists of (a) employee compensation, comprising salary and bonus, and benefits paid and payable to employees and senior managing directors and (b) equity-based compensation associated with the grants of equity-based awards to employees and senior managing directors.
Equity-Based Compensation — Compensation cost relating to the issuance of share-based awards to senior managing directors and employees is measured at fair value at the grant date, taking into consideration expected forfeitures, and expensed over the vesting period on a straight line basis. Equity-based awards that do not require future service are expensed immediately. Cash settled equity-based awards are classified as liabilities and are re-measured at the end of each reporting period.
Compensation and Benefits — Performance Fee — Performance Fee Compensation and Benefits consists of Carried Interest and Incentive Fee allocations, and may in future periods also include allocations of investment income from Blackstone’s firm investments, to employees and senior managing directors participating in certain profit sharing initiatives. Such compensation expense is subject to both positive and negative adjustments. Unlike Carried Interest and Incentive Fees, compensation expense is based on the performance of individual investments held by a fund rather than on a fund by fund basis.
Other Operating Expenses — Other operating expenses represent general and administrative expenses including interest expense, occupancy and equipment expenses and other expenses, which consist principally of professional fees, public company costs, travel and related expenses, communications and information services and depreciation and amortization.
Fund Expenses — The expenses of our consolidated Blackstone Funds consist primarily of interest expense, professional fees and other third-party expenses.
61
Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities represent the component of Partners’ Capital in consolidated Blackstone Funds and side-by-side entities held by third party investors and employees. The percentage interests held by third parties and employees is adjusted for general partner allocations and by subscriptions and redemptions in funds of hedge funds and certain credit-oriented funds which occur during the reporting period. In addition, all non-controlling interests in consolidated Blackstone Funds are attributed a share of income (loss) arising from the respective funds and a share of other comprehensive income, if applicable. Income (Loss) is allocated to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities based on the relative ownership interests of third party investors and employees after considering any contractual arrangements that govern the allocation of income (loss) such as fees allocable to The Blackstone Group. Non-controlling interests related to funds of hedge funds and certain other credit-oriented funds are subject to annual, semi-annual or quarterly redemption by investors in these funds following the expiration of a specified period of time (typically between one and three years), or may be withdrawn subject to a redemption fee in the funds of hedge funds and certain credit-oriented funds during the period when capital may not be withdrawn. As limited partners in these types of funds have been granted redemption rights, amounts relating to third party interests in such consolidated funds are presented as Redeemable Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. When redeemable amounts become legally payable to investors, they are classified as a liability and included in Accounts Payable, Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. For all consolidated funds in which redemption rights have not been granted, non-controlling interests are presented within Partners’ Capital in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities.
Non-Controlling Interests in Blackstone Holdings represent the component of Partners’ Capital in the consolidated Blackstone Holdings Partnerships held by the Founder, other senior managing directors and Blackstone employees.
Certain costs and expenses are borne directly by the Holdings Partnerships. Income (Loss), excluding those costs directly borne by and attributable to the Holdings Partnerships, is attributable to Non-Controlling Interests in Blackstone Holdings. This residual attribution is based on the year to date average percentage of Holdings Partnership units held by the Founder, other senior managing directors and Blackstone employees.
Income Taxes
The Blackstone Holdings partnerships and certain of their subsidiaries operate in the U.S. as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes and generally as corporate entities in non-U.S. jurisdictions. Accordingly, these entities in some cases are subject to New York City unincorporated business taxes or non-U.S. income taxes. In addition, certain of the wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Partnership and the Blackstone Holdings partnerships will be subject to federal, state and local corporate income taxes at the entity level and the related tax provision attributable to the Partnership’s share of this income tax is reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method of accounting. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis, using tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period when the change is enacted. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Current and deferred tax liabilities are recorded within Accounts Payable, Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.
Blackstone analyzes its tax filing positions in all of the U.S. federal, state, local and foreign tax jurisdictions where it is required to file income tax returns, as well as for all open tax years in these jurisdictions. If, based on
62
this analysis, the Partnership determines that uncertainties in tax positions exist, a reserve is established. Blackstone recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in General, Administrative, and Other expenses within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
There remains some uncertainty regarding Blackstone’s future taxation levels. Over the past several years, a number of legislative and administrative proposals to change the taxation of Carried Interest have been introduced and, in certain cases, have been passed by the U.S. House of Representatives. On May 28, 2010, the U.S. House of Representatives passed legislation, or “May 2010 House bill”, that would have, in general, treated income and gains, including gain on sale, attributable to an investment services partnership interest, or “ISPI”, as income subject to a new blended tax rate that is higher than the capital gains rate applicable to such income under current law, except to the extent such ISPI would have been considered under the legislation to be a qualified capital interest. Our common units and the interests that we hold in entities that are entitled to receive Carried Interest would likely have been classified as ISPIs for purposes of this legislation. In June 2010, the U.S. Senate considered but did not pass legislation that was generally similar to the legislation passed by the U.S. House of Representatives. More recently, Representative Levin and Senator Harkin (and other representatives) separately introduced similar legislation, or “2012 bills”, that would tax Carried Interest at ordinary income tax rates (which would be higher than the proposed blended rate under the May 2010 House bill). It is unclear whether or when the U.S. Congress will pass such legislation or what provisions will be included in any final legislation if enacted.
Each of the May 2010 House bill and the 2012 bills also provided that, for taxable years beginning ten years after the date of enactment, income derived with respect to an ISPI that is not a qualified capital interest and that is subject to the foregoing rules would not meet the qualifying income requirements under the publicly traded partnership rules. Therefore, if similar legislation were to be enacted, following such ten-year period, we would be precluded from qualifying as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes or be required to hold all such ISPIs through corporations.
On September 12, 2011, the Obama administration submitted similar legislation to Congress in the American Jobs Act that would tax income and gain, including gain on sale, attributable to an ISPI at ordinary rates, with an exception for certain qualified capital interests. The proposed legislation would also characterize certain income and gain in respect of ISPIs as non-qualifying income under the tax rules applicable to publicly traded partnerships after a ten-year transition period from the effective date, with an exception for certain qualified capital interests. This proposed legislation follows several prior statements by the Obama administration in support of changing the taxation of Carried Interest. In its published revenue proposal for 2013, the Obama administration proposed that the current law regarding the treatment of Carried Interest be changed to subject such income to ordinary income tax. The Obama administration proposed similar changes in its published revenue proposals for 2010, 2011 and 2012.
States and other jurisdictions have also considered legislation to increase taxes with respect to Carried Interest. For example, in 2010, the New York State Assembly passed a bill, which could have caused a non-resident of New York who holds our common units to be subject to New York state income tax on carried interest earned by entities in which we hold an indirect interest, thereby requiring the non-resident to file a New York state income tax return reporting such carried interest income. This legislation would have been retroactive to January 1, 2010. It is unclear whether or when similar legislation will be enacted. Finally, several state and local jurisdictions are evaluating ways to subject partnerships to entity level taxation through the imposition of state or local income, franchise or other forms of taxation or to increase the amount of such taxation.
If we were taxed as a corporation or were forced to hold interests in entities earning income from Carried Interest through taxable subsidiary corporations, our effective tax rate could increase significantly. The federal statutory rate for corporations is currently 35%, and the state and local tax rates, net of the federal benefit, aggregate approximately 10%. If a variation of the above described legislation or any other change in the tax laws, rules, regulations or interpretations preclude us from qualifying for treatment as a partnership for U.S.
63
federal income tax purposes under the publicly traded partnership rules or force us to hold interests in entities earning income from Carried Interest through taxable subsidiary corporations, this could materially increase our tax liability, and could well result in a reduction in the market price of our common units.
It is not possible at this time to meaningfully quantify the potential impact on Blackstone of this potential future legislation or any similar legislation. Multiple versions of legislation in this area have been proposed over the last few years that have included significantly different provisions regarding effective dates and the treatment of invested capital, tiered entities and cross-border operations, among other matters. Depending upon what version of the legislation, if any, were enacted, the potential impact on a public company such as Blackstone in a given year could differ dramatically and could be material. In addition, these legislative proposals would not themselves impose a tax on a publicly traded partnership such as Blackstone. Rather, they could force Blackstone and other publicly traded partnerships to restructure their operations so as to prevent disqualifying income from reaching the publicly traded partnership in amounts that would disqualify the partnership from treatment as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Such a restructuring could result in more income being earned in corporate subsidiaries, thereby increasing corporate income tax liability indirectly borne by the publicly traded partnership. In addition, we, and our common unitholders, could be taxed on any such restructuring. The nature of any such restructuring would depend on the precise provisions of the legislation that was ultimately enacted, as well as the particular facts and circumstances of Blackstone’s operations at the time any such legislation were to take effect, making the task of predicting the amount of additional tax highly speculative.
On February 22, 2012, the Obama administration announced its “framework” of key elements to change the U.S. federal income tax rules for businesses. Few specifics were included, and it is unclear what any actual legislation would provide, when it would be proposed or what its prospects for enactment would be. Several parts of the framework, if enacted, could adversely affect us. First, the framework would reduce the deductibility of interest for corporations in some manner not specified. A reduction in interest deductions could increase our tax rate and thereby reduce cash available for distribution to investors or for other uses by us. Such a reduction could also increase the effective cost of financing by companies in which we invest, which could reduce the value of our Carried Interest in respect of such companies. The framework would also reduce the top marginal tax rate on corporations from 35% to 28%. Such a change could increase the effective cost of financing such investments, which could again reduce the value of our Carried Interest. The framework suggests some entities currently treated as partnerships for tax purposes should be subject to an entity-level income tax similar to the corporate income tax. If such a proposal caused us to be subject to additional entity-level taxes, it could reduce cash available for distribution to investors or for other uses by us. Finally, the framework reiterates the President’s support for treatment of Carried Interest as ordinary income, as provided in the President’s revenue proposal for 2013 described above. Because the framework did not include specifics, its effect on us is unclear.
Blackstone uses Economic Income (“EI”) as a key measure of value creation, a benchmark of its performance and in making resource deployment and compensation decisions across its five segments. EI represents segment net income before taxes excluding transaction-related charges. Transaction-related charges arise from Blackstone’s initial public offering (“IPO”) and long-term retention programs outside of annual deferred compensation and other corporate actions, including acquisitions. Transaction-related charges include equity-based compensation charges, the amortization of intangible assets and contingent consideration associated with acquisitions. EI presents revenues and expenses on a basis that deconsolidates the investment funds we manage. Prior to June 30, 2012, EI had been called Economic Net Income. The renaming of this measure did not change any of the previously reported amounts. Economic Net Income (“ENI”) now represents EI adjusted to include current period taxes. Taxes represent the current tax provision (benefit) calculated on Income (Loss) Before Provision for Taxes.
64
Distributable Earnings
Distributable Earnings, which is derived from our segment reported results, is a supplemental measure to assess performance and amounts available for distributions to Blackstone unitholders, including Blackstone personnel and others who are limited partners of the Blackstone Holdings partnerships. Distributable Earnings, which is a non-GAAP measure, is intended to show the amount of net realized earnings without the effects of the consolidation of the Blackstone Funds. Distributable Earnings is derived from and reconciled to, but not equivalent to, its most directly comparable GAAP measure of Income (Loss) Before Provision for Taxes. See “— Liquidity and Capital Resources — Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for our discussion of Distributable Earnings.
Distributable Earnings, which is a component of Economic Net Income, is the sum across all segments of: (a) Total Management and Advisory Fees, (b) Interest and Dividend Revenue, (c) Other Revenue, (d) Realized Performance Fees, and (e) Realized Investment Income (Loss); less (a) Compensation, (b) Realized Performance Fee Compensation, (c) Other Operating Expenses and (d) Taxes and Payables Under the Tax Receivable Agreement. It is Blackstone’s current intention that on an annual basis it will distribute to unitholders all of its Distributable Earnings, less realized investment gains and returns of capital from investments and acquisitions, in excess of amounts determined by its general partner to be necessary or appropriate to provide for the conduct of its business, to make appropriate investments in its business and funds, to comply with applicable law, any of its debt instruments or other agreements, or to provide for future distributions to its unitholders for any ensuing quarter.
Fee Related Earnings
Blackstone uses Fee Related Earnings (“FRE”) as a measure to highlight earnings from operations excluding: (a) the income related to performance fees and related performance fee compensation costs, (b) income earned from Blackstone’s investments in the Blackstone Funds, and (c) realized and unrealized gains (losses) from other investments except for such gains (losses) from Blackstone’s Treasury cash management strategies. Management uses FRE as a measure to assess whether recurring revenue from our businesses is sufficient to adequately cover all of our operating expenses and generate profits. FRE equals contractual fee revenues, investment income from Blackstone’s Treasury cash management strategies and interest income, less (a) compensation expenses (which includes amortization of non-IPO and non-acquisition-related equity-based awards, but excludes amortization of IPO and acquisition-related equity-based awards, Carried Interest and incentive fee compensation) and (b) other operating expenses. See “—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for our discussion of Fee Related Earnings.
Operating Metrics
The alternative asset management business is a complex business that is primarily based on managing third party capital and does not require substantial capital investment to support rapid growth. However, there also can be volatility associated with its earnings and cash flows. Since our inception, we have developed and used various key operating metrics to assess and monitor the operating performance of our various alternative asset management businesses in order to monitor the effectiveness of our value creating strategies.
Assets Under Management. Assets Under Management refers to the assets we manage. Our Assets Under Management equals the sum of:
65
Our carry funds are commitment-based drawdown structured funds that do not permit investors to redeem their interests at their election. Interests related to our funds of hedge funds and certain of our credit-oriented funds are generally subject to annual, semi-annual or quarterly withdrawal or redemption by investors upon advance written notice, with the majority of our funds requiring from 60 days up to 95 days’ notice, depending on the fund and the liquidity profile of the underlying assets. Investment advisory agreements related to separately managed accounts may generally be terminated by an investor on 30 to 90 days’ notice.
Fee-Earning Assets Under Management. Fee-Earning Assets Under Management refers to the assets we manage on which we derive management and / or performance fees. Our Fee-Earning Assets Under Management equals the sum of:
For our carry funds, total assets under management includes the fair value of the investments held, whereas fee-earning assets under management includes the amount of capital commitments or the remaining amount of invested capital at cost, depending on whether the investment period has or has not expired. As such, fee-earning assets under management may be greater than total assets under management when the aggregate fair value of the remaining investments is less than the cost of those investments.
Limited Partner Capital Invested. Limited Partner Capital Invested represents the amount of Limited Partner capital commitments which were invested by our carry funds during each period presented, plus the capital invested through co-investments arranged by us that were made by limited partners in investments of our carry funds on which we receive fees or a Carried Interest allocation.
We manage our business using traditional financial measures and our key operating metrics since we believe that these metrics measure the productivity of our investment activities.
66
Consolidated Results of Operations
Following is a discussion of our consolidated results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. For a more detailed discussion of the factors that affected the results of our five business segments (which are presented on a basis that deconsolidates the investment funds we manage) in these periods, see “—Segment Analysis” below.
The following table sets forth information regarding our consolidated results of operations and certain key operating metrics for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Non- Controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities
67
Total Revenues were $627.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $681.1 million compared to Total Revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011 of $1.3 billion. This decrease in revenues was primarily driven by a decrease of $536.8 million in Performance Fees and a decrease of $132.8 million in Investment Income (Loss). These decreases were largely driven by the volatility in the public markets as a result of global economic uncertainty.
Total Revenues were $1.6 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $882.3 million compared to Total Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2011 of $2.5 billion. The decrease in revenues was primarily attributable to a decrease of $760.7 million in Performance Fees and a $163.8 million decrease in Investment Income (Loss), partially offset by a $48.9 million increase in Management and Advisory Fees. The decreases were largely driven by the volatility in the public markets as a result of global economic uncertainty.
Expenses were $739.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $245.0 million, or 25%, compared to $984.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease of $271.2 million in Compensation and Benefits. Performance Fee Compensation decreased $105.1 million from the prior year period due to the reversals of Performance Fee accruals related to the decline in Performance Fees. Compensation decreased $166.1 million from the prior year period to $533.4 million primarily due to a decline in equity compensation resulting from the vesting of certain IPO awards in 2011. General, Administrative and Other expenses were $135.7 million for the current quarter, an increase of $9.6 million, driven primarily by the levels of business activity and headcount.
Expenses were $1.5 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $452.1 million, or 23%, compared to $2.0 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease of $503.0 million in Compensation and Benefits across the segments. Compensation decreased $330.3 million from the prior year period to $1.0 billion principally due to the absence of equity-based compensation expense discussed above. General, Administrative and Other expenses were $278.5 million for the current year period, an increase of $23.0 million driven by the same factors as for the quarterly period noted above.
Other Income (Loss) is comprised of Net Gains (Losses) from Fund Investment Activities. Net Gains (Losses) from Fund Investment Activities is attributable to the consolidated Blackstone Funds which are largely held by third party investors. As such, most of this Other Income is eliminated from the results attributable to The Blackstone Group L.P. through the redeemable non-controlling interests and non-controlling interests items in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Other Income (Loss) was $248.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $322.9 million compared to $(74.7) million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The change was principally driven by increases in unrealized gains relating to the consolidated CLO vehicles. This increase was due to a greater demand in the market from the first quarter of 2011 for the underlying investments held by the consolidated CLO vehicles which raised asset values as well as the consolidation of the CLO vehicles from the Harbourmaster and Allied Irish Banks acquisitions.
Other Income (Loss) was $536.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $656.2 million compared to $(119.8) million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The change was principally driven by the same factors discussed above for the three month period.
68
Blackstone’s Provision for Taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $41.3 million and $64.2 million, respectively. This results in an effective tax rate of 30.5% and 25.8%, respectively, based on our Income Before Provision for Taxes of $135.6 million and $248.8 million, respectively. The 4.7% increase in the effective tax rate resulted mainly due to the impact of the portion of equity-based compensation that is not deductible for tax purposes and the foreign tax provision.
Blackstone’s Provision for Taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $80.1 million and $103.0 million, respectively. This results in an effective tax rate of 13.5% and 28.2%, respectively, based on our Income Before Provision for Taxes of $592.0 million and $366.0 million, respectively.
Two principal factors contributed to the 14.7% decrease in the effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011. First, the GAAP equity-based compensation expense exceeds the tax deductible equity-based compensation expense. The tax expense attributable to equity-based compensation was $37.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $57.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. This decrease reduced our effective tax rate by 9.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the corresponding prior year period. Second, state and local taxes, net of federal benefit where applicable, were $19.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $33.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. This decrease in state and local taxes reduced our effective tax rate by 5.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the corresponding prior year period. The reduction was due to less income subject to New York State and New York City taxes in the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011.
The Net Income Attributable to Redeemable Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities and Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities is attributable to the consolidated Blackstone Funds. The amounts of these items vary directly with the performance of the consolidated Blackstone Funds and largely eliminate the amount of Other Income—Net Gains (Losses) from Fund Investment Activities from the Net Income Attributable to The Blackstone Group L.P.
Net income (Loss) Attributed to Non-Controlling Interests in Blackstone Holdings is derived from the Income (Loss) before Provision (Benefits) for Taxes, excluding the Net Gains (Losses) from Fund Investment Activities and the percentage allocation of the income between Blackstone Holdings and the Blackstone Group L.P.
For the quarter ended June 30, 2012, the Net Loss Attributed to the Non-Controlling Interests in Blackstone Holdings was primarily driven by the reduction in revenues resulting from the variance in Performance Fees.
69
The following tables present certain operating metrics for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. For a description of how Assets Under Management and Fee-Earning Assets Under Management are determined, please see “— Key Financial Measures and Indicators — Operating Metrics — Assets Under Management and Fee-Earning Assets Under Management”:
Fee-Earning Assets Under Management
Inflows, including Commitments (a)
Outflows, including Distributions (b)
Realizations (c)
Net Inflows (Outflows)
Market Appreciation (Depreciation) (d)
Balance, End of Period (e)
Increase (Decrease)
70
Assets Under Management
Net Inflows
Market Appreciation (d)
Increase
71
Fee-Earning Assets Under Management were $157.6 billion at June 30, 2012, an increase of $1.4 billion, or 1%, compared to $156.3 billion at March 31, 2012. Inflows of $5.8 billion were primarily related to (a) inflows of $298.9 million in our Private Equity segment primarily related to additional capital raised for our energy focused fund, Blackstone Energy Partners (“BEP”), (b) inflows of $2.5 billion in our Real Estate segment primarily related to additional closings of commitments in BREP VII, (c) inflows of $1.2 billion in our Hedge Fund Solutions segment primarily related to growth in its commingled and customized investment products and long only solutions business, and (d) inflows of $1.8 billion in our Credit Businesses segment principally due to limited partner capital invested in our carry funds and inflows across our long only platform. Outflows of $1.7 billion were primarily attributable to (a) outflows of $825.5 million in our Credit Businesses segment, due primarily to the returns of capital to investors of certain CLO vehicles post their reinvestment periods, and (b) outflows of $775.0 million in our Hedge Fund Solutions segment as a result of, in general, the liquidity needs of limited partners. Realizations of $1.0 billion were driven by (a) realizations of $455.9 million in our Private Equity segment that were primarily a result of the dispositions of investments in funds which earn fees based on remaining invested capital, and (b) realizations of $447.1 million in our Real Estate segment primarily due to realizations from various investments within the real estate segment’s funds. Net market depreciation of $1.7 billion was principally due to declines and increased volatility in the global markets during the second quarter of 2012.
BAAM had net inflows of $1.3 billion from July 1 through August 1, 2012.
Fee-Earning Assets Under Management were $157.6 billion at June 30, 2012, an increase of $20.9 billion, or 15%, compared to $136.8 billion at December 31, 2011. Inflows of $25.3 billion were primarily related to (a) inflows of $798.5 million in our Private Equity segment primarily due to additional capital raised for our energy focused fund, BEP, and the final close for our BCP VI fund, (b) inflows of $8.4 billion in our Real Estate segment primarily due to additional closings of commitments in BREP VII, (c) inflows of $2.7 billion in our Hedge Fund Solutions segment mainly from BAAM’s customized and commingled investment products, and (d) inflows of $13.5 billion in our Credit Businesses segment primarily due to the $9.4 billion acquisition of Harbourmaster on January 5, 2012. Outflows of $2.5 billion were primarily attributable to (a) outflows of $1.3 billion in our Credit Businesses segment principally due to returns of capital to investors of certain CLO vehicles post their reinvestment periods, and (b) outflows of $1.1 billion in our Hedge Fund Solutions segment primarily due to liquidity needs of limited partners. Realizations of $2.7 billion were driven by (a) realizations of $1.1 billion in our Real Estate segment primarily due to realizations from various investments within the BREP and BREDS’ funds, (b) realizations of $876.5 million in our Private Equity segment primarily as a result of the dispositions of investments in funds which earn fees based on remaining invested capital, and (c) realizations of $732.1 million in our Credit Businesses segment principally due to returns of capital due to realizations in the carry funds.
Assets Under Management were $190.3 billion at June 30, 2012, an increase of $193.7 million, compared to $190.1 billion at March 31, 2012. Inflows of $5.7 billion were primarily related to (a) inflows of $859.8 million in our Private Equity segment due to the closing on a multi-asset class investment fund and additional closings on our BEP fund, (b) inflows of $1.9 billion in our Real Estate segment primarily related to additional closings of commitments in BREP VII, (c) inflows of $1.2 billion in our Hedge Fund Solutions segment due to growth in its commingled and customized investment products, and (d) inflows of $1.6 billion in our Credit Businesses segment driven by inflows across our long only platform. Net market depreciation of $1.9 billion was principally due to declines and increased volatility in the global markets during the second quarter of 2012. Outflows of $2.1 billion and realizations of $1.5 billion across the segments were due to the same reasons noted in Fee-Earning Assets Under Management above.
Assets Under Management were $190.3 billion at June 30, 2012, an increase of $24.0 billion, or 14%, compared to $166.2 billion at December 31, 2011. Inflows of $27.1 billion were primarily related to (a) inflows
72
of $1.9 billion in our Private Equity segment driven by the closing on a multi-asset class investment fund and additional closings on our BEP fund, (b) inflows of $6.7 billion in our Real Estate segment primarily due to additional closings of commitments in BREP VII, (c) inflows of $2.7 billion in our Hedge Fund Solutions segment due to growth in its commingled and customized investment products, and (d) inflows of $15.8 billion in our Credit Businesses segment primarily due to the $9.6 billion acquisition of Harbourmaster on January 5, 2012. Outflows of $3.2 billion and realizations of $3.5 billion across the segments were due to the same reasons noted in Fee-Earning Assets Under Management above.
Limited Partner Capital Invested
The following table presents the limited partner capital deployed during the respective periods:
Capital Deployed
Hedge Fund Solutions
Limited Partner Capital Invested was $2.4 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $1.3 billion, or 34%, from $3.7 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Limited Partner Capital Invested was $5.1 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $0.2 billion, or 4%, compared to $5.3 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The change for the six month period primarily reflected an increase of $1.1 billion in our Credit Businesses segment due to limited partner capital invested in our mezzanine and rescue lending funds, partially offset by decreases of $574.7 million in our Private Equity segment due to timing of transactions being closed and $441.0 million in our Real Estate segment due to the acquisition of the U.S. assets of Brixmor (formerly known as Centro) during the second quarter of 2011.
73
Net Accrued Performance Fees
The following table presents the accrued performance fees, net of compensation, of the Blackstone Funds as of June 30, 2012 and 2011:
BCP IV Carried Interest
Other Carried Interest
Total Private Equity
BREP V Carried Interest
BREP VI Carried Interest
BREP VII Carried Interest
BREP Int’l I Carried Interest
BREP EU III Carried Interest
BREDS Carried Interest
BREDS Incentive Fees
Asia Platform Incentive Fees
Total Real Estate
Total Hedge Fund Solutions
Total Credit Businesses
Total Blackstone
74
Investment Record
Fund returns information for our significant funds is included throughout this discussion and analysis to facilitate an understanding of our results of operations for the periods presented. The fund returns information reflected in this discussion and analysis is not indicative of the financial performance of The Blackstone Group L.P. and is also not necessarily indicative of the future performance of any particular fund. An investment in The Blackstone Group L.P. is not an investment in any of our funds. There can be no assurance that any of our funds or our other existing and future funds will achieve similar returns.
The following table presents the investment record of our significant draw down funds from inception through June 30, 2012:
Fund
(Investment Period)
BCP I (Oct 1987 / Oct 1993)
BCP II (Oct 1993 / Aug 1997)
BCP III (Aug 1997 / Nov 2002)
Non-Contributed Funds
BCOM (June 2000 / Jun 2006)
BCP IV (Nov 2002 / Dec 2005)
BCP V (Dec 2005 / Jan 2011)
BCP VI (Jan 2011 / Jan 2016) (d)
BEP (Aug 2011 / Aug 2017) (d)
Contributed Funds
Dollar
Pre-BREP
BREP I (Sep 1994 / Oct 1996)
BREP II (Oct 1996 / Mar 1999)
BREP III (Apr 1999 / Apr 2003)
BREP IV (Apr 2003 / Dec 2005)
BREP V (Dec 2005 / Feb 2007)
BREP VI (Feb 2007 / Aug 2011)
BREP VII (Aug 2011 / Feb 2017) (e)
BREDS Drawdown (Various)
BREP Co-Investment (Various) (f)
Total Dollar
Euro
BREP Int’l (Jan 2001 / Sep 2005)
BREP Int’l II (Sep 2005 / Jun 2008)
BREP Europe III (Jun 2008 / Dec 2013)
Total Euro
Mezzanine (Jul 2007 / Jul 2012)
Rescue Lending (May 2009 / May 2013)
75
The returns presented herein represent those of the applicable Blackstone Funds and not those of The Blackstone Group L.P.
The Private Equity June 30, 2012 inception to date net IRR on a realized / partially realized basis for the following funds were BCP I, 19%; BCP II, 32%; BCP III, 14%; BCOM, 17%; BCP IV, 44%; and BCP V, 6%.
The Real Estate June 30, 2012 inception to date net IRR on a realized / partially realized basis for the following funds were Pre-BREP, 33%; BREP I, 40%; BREP II, 19%; BREP III, 22%; BREP Int’l, 26%; BREP IV, 65%; BREP Int’l II, 8%; BREP V, 60%; BREP VI, 39% and BREP Co-Investment, 11%.
Segment Analysis
Discussed below is our EI for each of our segments. This information is reflected in the manner utilized by our senior management to make operating decisions, assess performance and allocate resources. References to “our” sectors or investments may also refer to portfolio companies and investments of the underlying funds that we manage.
For segment reporting purposes, revenues and expenses are presented on a basis that deconsolidates the investment funds we manage. As a result, segment revenues are greater than those presented on a consolidated GAAP basis because fund management fees recognized in certain segments are received from the Blackstone Funds and eliminated in consolidation when presented on a consolidated GAAP basis. Furthermore, segment expenses are lower than related amounts presented on a consolidated GAAP basis due to the exclusion of fund expenses that are paid by Limited Partners and the elimination of non-controlling interests.
76
The following table presents our results of operations for our Private Equity segment:
Management Fees, Net
Total Management Fees, Net
Revenues were $11.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $387.6 million compared to $399.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in revenues was attributed to decreases in Performance Fees, Investment Income and Total Management Fees of $247.7 million, $114.5 million and $25.3 million, respectively.
77
Performance Fees, which are determined on a fund by fund basis, were $(59.1) million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, principally due to a net loss in our BCP IV portfolio. While the current year quarter returns were unfavorably impacted by the public share prices of Kosmos Energy and TRW Automotive Holdings consistent with declines in the broader public markets, the previous year returns were driven by our publicly traded portfolio companies. On a realized basis, Performance Fees were $27.4 million greater than the second quarter of 2011 as BCP IV was able to execute the sale of a portion of its holdings in Team Health Holdings, generating a 3.1 times multiple of invested capital.
Investment Income (Loss) was $(34.5) million compared to $80.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Volatile markets unfavorably impacted our public holdings during the current year period while public holdings and our energy investments drove returns during the three months ended June 30, 2011. At June 30, 2012, the unrealized value and cumulative realized proceeds, before Carried Interest, fees and expenses, of our contributed private equity funds represented 1.4 times investors’ original investments. On a realized basis, this multiple was 2.5 times investors’ original investments for contributed funds.
Total Management Fees were $101.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $25.3 million compared to $127.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, driven by lower Transaction and Other Fees, partially offset by higher Base Management Fees and lower Management Fee Offsets. Base Management Fees were $87.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $5.2 million compared to $82.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, principally as a result of fees generated from our BEP fund, which commenced its investment period during the third quarter of 2011. Transaction and Other Fees were $15.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $37.4 million compared to $52.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The quarter ended June 30, 2011 included an accelerated monitoring fee received in connection with the initial public offering of Freescale Semiconductor as well as fees earned from new investments made during the period. Management Fee Offsets relate to a reduction of management fees payable by our limited partners in BCP VI based on the amount they reimbursed Blackstone for placement fees.
Revenues were $182.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $490.6 million compared to $673.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in revenues was attributed to decreases in Performance Fees, Investment Income and Total Management Fees of $324.6 million, $131.2 million, and $32.6 million, respectively.
Performance Fees, which are determined on a fund by fund basis, were $(21.1) million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $324.6 million, compared to $303.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, principally due to lower performance in the BCP IV portfolio driven by the decline in share prices of Kosmos Energy and Vanguard Health Systems, partially offset by increases in the values of Team Health Holdings and TRW Automotive Holdings, two additional public holdings. The comparative 2011 quarter returns were driven by investments in the energy sector and our public holdings.
Investment Income (Loss) was $(4.2) million, a decrease of $131.2 million, compared to $127.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, driven by BCOM, BCP IV and BCP V, which had significant appreciation during the six months ended June 30, 2011 outpacing the returns during the current year period.
Total Management Fees were $201.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $32.6 million compared to $234.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, driven by a decrease in Transaction and Other Fees, and partially offset by an increase in Base Management Fees and reduced Management Fee Offsets. Base Management Fees were $173.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $11.0 million compared to $162.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, principally as a result of fees generated from BEP, which commenced its investment period during the third quarter of 2011. Transaction and Other Fees were $33.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $54.6 million compared to $87.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Transaction and Other Fees for
78
the six months ended June 30, 2011 included one time fees earned from the accelerated termination of management advisory service agreements related to Nielsen Holdings and Freescale Semiconductor, two portfolio companies that completed initial public offerings, as well as fees generated from new investment activity. Management Fee Offsets relate to a reduction of management fees payable by our limited partners in BCP VI based on the amount they reimbursed Blackstone for placement fees.
Expenses were $76.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $47.3 million compared to $124.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The $47.3 million decrease was primarily attributed to a $36.8 million decrease in Performance Fee Compensation and a $10.9 million decrease in Compensation. Performance Fee Compensation decreased as a result of the decreases in Performance Fees revenue described above. Compensation decreased as a portion of it is related to the segment’s results, exclusive of Performance Fees and Investment Income. Other Operating Expenses were relatively flat over the same prior year period.
Expenses were $157.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $63.4 million, compared to $220.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The $63.4 million decrease was primarily attributed to a $50.7 million decrease in Performance Fee Compensation and a $13.2 million decrease in Compensation. Performance Fee Compensation decreased as a result of the decrease in Performance Fees revenue. Compensation decreased as a result of the decreased Management Fees revenue described above. Other Operating Expenses were relatively flat over the same prior year period.
Fund Returns
The following table presents the internal rates of return of our significant private equity funds:
Fund (a)
BCP IV
BCP V
BCP VI (b)
BEP (b)
79
The Private Equity segment has three active contributed funds with closed investment periods: BCP IV, BCP V and BCOM. As of June 30, 2012, BCP IV was above its Carried Interest threshold (i.e., the preferred return payable to its limited partners before the general partner is eligible to receive Carried Interest) and would still be above its Carried Interest threshold even if all remaining investments were valued at zero. BCP V is currently below its Carried Interest threshold. BCOM is currently below its Carried Interest threshold but has generated inception-to-date positive returns. We are entitled to retain previously realized Carried Interest up to 20% of BCOM’s net gains. As a result, Performance Fees are recognized from BCOM on current period gains and losses.
The following table presents the Carried Interest status of our private equity funds out of their investment period which are currently not generating performance fees as of June 30, 2012:
Funds out of the Investment Period
80
The following table presents our results of operations for our Real Estate segment:
Performance Fee Compensation Realized
81
Revenues were $338.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $309.9 million compared to $648.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in revenues was primarily attributable to a decrease of $286.0 million in Performance Fees and a decrease of $24.7 million in Investment Income.
Performance Fees, which are determined on a fund by fund basis, were $164.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $286.0 million compared to $450.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Performance Fees continued to benefit from the strong performance of our Real Estate carry funds. However, year over year comparison were negatively impacted by a decrease in the net appreciation of our BREP V and BREP VI carry funds’ investments and the “catch-up” provision of the Real Estate funds’ profit allocations in the prior year period. For the three months ended June 30, 2012, the carrying value of assets for Blackstone’s contributed Real Estate funds, including fee-paying co-investments, increased 2.9% driven by the continued strengthening of operating fundamentals, particularly in our hospitality, office and retail holdings where occupancy rose during the quarter. As of June 30, 2012, the unrealized value and cumulative proceeds, before carried interest, fees and expenses, of our contributed Real Estate carry funds represented 1.4 times investors’ original investments. On a realized basis, this multiple was 1.9 times investors’ original investments.
Investment Income was $24.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $24.7 million compared to $48.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in Investment Income was primarily driven by the year over year decrease in the net appreciation of investments related to the BREP VI fund, in which Blackstone owns a greater share of such investments.
Total Management Fees were $147.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $1.6 million compared to $146.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Base Management Fees were $127.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $30.4 million compared to $97.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, which was primarily related to fees generated from the commencement of BREP VII. Transaction and Other Fees were $25.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $24.1 million compared to $49.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, which was primarily related to a decrease in the size of completed transactions.
Revenues were $765.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $438.4 million compared to $1.2 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in revenues was primarily attributed to a decrease of $418.7 million in Performance Fees and a decrease of $55.3 million in Investment Income, partially offset by an increase of $38.7 million in Total Management Fees.
Performance Fees, which are determined on a fund by fund basis, were $402.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $418.7 million compared to $821.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Performance Fees continued to benefit from the strong performance of our Real Estate carry funds. However, year over year comparison were negatively impacted by a decrease in the net appreciation of our BREP V and BREP VI carry funds’ investments and the “catch-up” provision of the Real Estate funds’ profit allocations in the prior year period. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, the carrying value of assets for Blackstone’s contributed Real Estate funds, including fee-paying co-investments, increased 6.7% driven by the continued strengthening of operating fundamentals, particularly in our hospitality, office and retail holdings where occupancy rose during the first half of the year.
Investment Income was $57.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $55.3 million compared to $113.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in Investment Income was primarily driven by the year over year decrease in the net appreciation of investments related to the BREP VI fund, in which Blackstone owns a greater share of such investments.
Total Management Fees were $301.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $38.7 million compared to $262.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Base Management Fees were
82
$275.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $82.7 million compared to $192.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, which was primarily related to fees generated from the commencement of BREP VII. Transaction and Other Fees were $39.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $31.3 million compared to $70.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, which was primarily related to a decrease in the size of completed transactions.
Expenses were $141.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $52.6 million, compared to $194.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease was primarily attributed to a $62.1 million decrease in Performance Fee Compensation, a result of a decrease in Performance Fees revenue, partially offset by an increase in Compensation of $5.9 million to $76.6 million. Compensation rose primarily due to an increase in headcount. Other Operating Expenses increased $3.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, principally due to depreciation, professional expense and other expenses.
Expenses were $301.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $86.4 million, compared to $387.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease was primarily attributed to a $107.7 million decrease in Performance Fee Compensation, a result of a decrease in Performance Fees revenue, partially offset by an increase in Compensation of $17.2 million to $145.5 million. Compensation rose primarily due to an increase in headcount. Other Operating Expenses increased $4.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, principally due to depreciation, professional expense and other expenses.
Fund return information for our significant funds is included throughout this discussion and analysis to facilitate an understanding of our results of operations for the periods presented. The fund returns information reflected in this discussion and analysis is not indicative of the performance of The Blackstone Group L.P. and is also not necessarily indicative of the future performance of any particular fund. An investment in The Blackstone Group L.P. is not an investment in any of our funds. There can be no assurance that any of our funds or our other existing and future funds will achieve similar returns.
The following table presents the internal rates of return of our significant real estate funds:
June 30, 2012
BREP International (b)
BREP IV
BREP V
BREP International II (b)
BREP VI
BREP Europe III (b)
BREP VII (c)
BREDS
BSSF I
CMBS
BREP Co-Invest
83
The following table presents the Carried Interest status of our real estate carry funds with expired investment periods which are currently not generating performance fees as of June 30, 2012:
Fully Invested Funds
The Real Estate segment has three funds in their investment period, which were above their respective Carried Interest thresholds as of June 30, 2012: BREP Europe III, BREP VII and BREDS.
84
The following table presents our results of operations for our Hedge Fund Solutions segment:
Revenues were $72.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $12.5 million compared to $84.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in revenues was primarily attributable to a decrease of $13.9 million in Performance Fees to $(9.8) million, partially offset by an increase of $4.0 million in Total Management Fees to $84.0 million.
85
Performance Fees were $(9.8) million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $13.9 million compared to $4.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to lower returns. The returns of the underlying assets for Blackstone’s Hedge Fund Solutions funds were down 1.2% during the three months ended June 30, 2012. Fee-Earning Assets Under Management related to funds of funds above their respective high-water marks and/or hurdle, and therefore eligible for Performance Fees, decreased during the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011. This decrease was a result of the softer performance of the underlying assets of the segment.
Total Management Fees were $84.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $4.0 million compared to $80.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Base Management Fees were $84.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $5.0 million compared to the prior year period, driven by an increase in Fee-Earning Assets Under Management of 8% from the prior year period, which was primarily from net inflows.
Revenues were $189.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, relatively flat compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011. A decrease of $7.6 million in Performance Fees to $16.7 million and a decrease of $2.3 million in Investment Income (Loss) to $6.2 million was mostly offset by an increase of $9.4 million in Total Management Fees to $165.5 million.
Performance Fees were $16.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $7.6 million compared to $24.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to lower returns. The returns of the underlying assets for Blackstone’s Hedge Fund Solutions’ funds were 2.7% during the six months ended June 30, 2012. Fee-Earning Assets Under Management related to funds of funds above their respective high-water marks and/or hurdle, and therefore eligible for Performance Fees, decreased during the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011. This decrease was a result of the softer performance of the underlying assets of the segment.
Total Management Fees were $165.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $9.4 million compared to $156.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Base Management Fees were $166.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $11.2 million compared to the prior year period, driven by an increase in Fee-Earning Assets Under Management of 8% from the prior year period, which was primarily from net inflows.
Expenses were $45.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $5.1 million compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011. The $5.1 million decrease was primarily attributed to a $2.9 million increase in Compensation, a $6.4 million decrease in Performance Fee Compensation and a $1.6 million decrease in Other Operating Expenses. Compensation was $34.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $2.9 million, compared to $31.7 million for the prior year period. Other Operating Expenses decreased $1.6 million to $14.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to $16.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to the divestiture of Asia Advisors as well as a decrease in placement fees.
Expenses were $96.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $1.0 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011. The $1.0 million decrease was primarily attributed to a $3.0 million increase in Compensation, offset by a $3.4 million decrease in Performance Fee Compensation and a $0.6 million decrease in Other Operating Expenses. Compensation was $62.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $3.0 million, compared to $59.8 million for the prior year period. Performance Fee Compensation was $5.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $3.4 million, compared to $8.9 million for the prior year period. Other Operating Expenses decreased $0.6 million to $28.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to $29.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to the divestiture of Asia Advisors as well as a decrease in placement fees and all other expenses.
86
The following table presents information regarding our Fee-Earning Assets Under Management:
BAAM Managed Funds (b)
Composite Returns
Composite returns information is included throughout this discussion and analysis to facilitate an understanding of our results of operations for the periods presented. The composite returns information reflected in this discussion and analysis is not indicative of the performance of The Blackstone Group L.P. and is also not necessarily indicative of the future results of any particular fund. An investment in The Blackstone Group L.P. is not an investment in any of our funds or composites. There can be no assurance that any of our funds or composites or our other existing and future funds or composites will achieve similar returns.
The following table presents the return information of the BAAM Managed Funds, Core Fund Composite:
Composite
BAAM Managed Funds, Core Funds Composite (b)
The returns presented represent those of the applicable Blackstone Funds and not those of The Blackstone Group L.P.
87
The following table presents our results of operations for our Credit Businesses segment:
88
Revenues were $126.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $28.5 million compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in revenues was primarily attributed to an increase of $31.2 million in Total Management Fees and $9.4 million in Performance Fees, partially offset by a decrease of $12.2 million in Investment Income (Loss).
Performance Fees were $39.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $9.4 million from the prior year period. The increase reflected steady returns in our carry funds driven by underlying investment performance. The returns of the underlying assets for Blackstone’s credit-oriented business were (0.8)% for the hedge funds, 4.2% for the mezzanine funds and 2.3% for the rescue lending funds for the three months ended June 30, 2012.
Total Management Fees were $89.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $31.2 million from the prior year period. Base Management Fees were $81.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $24.4 million compared to the prior year period due to greater Fee-Earning Assets Under Management, partially due to the acquisition of Harbourmaster in January 2012.
Revenues were $307.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $52.7 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in revenues was primarily attributed to an increase of $61.4 million in Total Management Fees, partially offset by decreases of $2.4 million in Performance Fees and $8.1 million in Investment Income (Loss).
Performance Fees were $122.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $2.4 million from the prior year period. The decrease in Performance Fees reflected a slower overall rate of appreciation from the prior year period. The returns of the underlying assets for Blackstone’s credit-oriented business were 2.8% for the hedge funds, 9.5% for the mezzanine funds and 7.3 % for the rescue lending funds for the six months ended June 30, 2012.
Total Management Fees were $174.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $61.4 million from the prior year period. Base Management Fees were $161.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $49.8 million compared to the prior year period due to greater Fee-Earning Assets Under Management primarily as a result of the $9.4 billion acquisition of Harbourmaster in January 2012.
Expenses were $71.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $15.5 million, or 28%, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011. The $15.5 million increase in expenses was primarily attributed to an increase of $9.8 million in Compensation and an increase of $5.5 million in Other Operating Expenses. The increase in Other Operating Expenses was primarily due to greater professional and business development fees.
Expenses were $165.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $13.7 million, or 9%, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011. The $13.7 million increase in expenses was primarily attributed to an increase of $17.4 million in Compensation and an increase of $7.3 million in Other Operating Expenses, partially offset by a decrease of $10.9 million in Performance Fee Compensation. Performance Fee Compensation was $52.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to $63.3 million for the prior year period. Other Operating Expenses increased $7.3 million to $32.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to $25.6 million for the prior year period. The increase was primarily due to an increase in depreciation and amortization expense related to a one-time write-off of leasehold improvements and an increase in business development expenses related to the closing of the Harbourmaster acquisition.
89
Fund return information for our significant businesses is included throughout this discussion and analysis to facilitate an understanding of our results of operations for the periods presented. The fund returns information reflected in this discussion and analysis is not indicative of the performance of The Blackstone Group L.P. and is also not necessarily indicative of the future results of any particular fund. An investment in The Blackstone Group L.P. is not an investment in any of our funds. There can be no assurance that any of our funds or our other existing and future funds will achieve similar returns.
The following table presents the return information of the segment’s Flagship Hedge Funds:
Flagship Hedge Funds (b)
The following table presents the Internal Rates of Return of our significant Credit Businesses drawdown funds:
Mezzanine Funds (b)
Rescue Lending Funds (c)
As of June 30, 2012, the significant Credit Businesses drawdown funds were above their respective Carried Interest thresholds (i.e., the preferred return payable to its limited partners before the general partner is eligible to receive Carried Interest).
90
Financial Advisory
The following table presents our results of operations for our Financial Advisory segment:
Total Advisory and Transaction Fees
Revenues were $95.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $8.8 million, or 8%, compared to $104.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in revenues was driven primarily by decreases in Blackstone’s fund placement business and in Blackstone Advisory Partners’ business, partially offset by an increase in Blackstone’s restructuring and reorganization business. The increase in Blackstone’s restructuring and reorganization business was driven primarily by a higher amount of advisory fees recorded relative to the prior year period due to several significant transactions completed during the three months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease in Blackstone Advisory Partners’ business was due to a decrease in the number of transactions compared to the prior year period. The decrease in fees earned by Blackstone’s fund placement business was primarily due to the timing of several transactions.
Revenues were $173.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $3.4 million, or 2%, compared to $177.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in revenues was driven primarily by decreases in Blackstone’s fund placement business, partially offset by an increase in Blackstone’s restructuring and reorganization business. The increase in Blackstone’s restructuring and reorganization business was driven primarily by an increase in revenues due to several significant transactions completed in the current year period, as well as an increase in the number of transactions completed during the six months ended June 30, 2012. Blackstone Advisory Partners’ revenue was roughly flat compared to the prior year period. The decrease in fees earned by Blackstone’s fund placement business was primarily due to the timing of several transactions.
91
Expenses were $86.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $5.5 million, or 6%, compared to $92.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Compensation and Benefits decreased $11.2 million compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011, principally due to an overall decrease in total fee revenue across the segment. Compensation expense for these businesses is related to their financial performance. Other Operating Expenses increased $5.7 million over the three months ended June 30, 2011, principally due to an increase in all other expenses.
Expenses were $175.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $11.3 million, or 7%, compared to $164.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Compensation and Benefits increased $2.4 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011, principally due to an increase in compensation expense across all of our businesses. Other Operating Expenses increased $8.9 million over the six months ended June 30, 2011, principally due to increases in all other expenses.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
Blackstone’s business model derives revenue primarily from third party assets under management and from advisory businesses. Blackstone is not a capital or balance sheet intensive business and targets operating expense levels such that total management and advisory fees exceed total operating expenses each period. As a result, we require limited capital resources to support the working capital or operating needs of our businesses. We draw primarily on the long term committed capital of our limited partner investors to fund the investment requirements of the Blackstone Funds and use our own realizations and cash flows to invest in growth initiatives, make commitments to our own funds, which are typically less than 5% of the assets under management of a fund, or pay distributions to unitholders.
Fluctuations in our balance sheet result primarily from activities of the Blackstone Funds which are consolidated as well as business transactions, such as the issuance of senior notes described below. The majority economic ownership interests of the Blackstone Funds are reflected as Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The consolidation of these Blackstone Funds has no net effect on the Partnership’s Net Income or Partners’ Capital. Additionally, fluctuations in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition also include appreciation or depreciation in Blackstone investments in the Blackstone Funds, additional investments and redemptions of such interests in the Blackstone Funds and the collection of receivables related to management and advisory fees.
Total assets were $26.1 billion as of June 30, 2012, an increase of $4.2 billion from December 31, 2011. The increase in total assets was primarily attributable to a $4.2 billion increase in Investments. Total liabilities were $15.9 billion as of June 30, 2012, an increase of $3.2 billion from December 31, 2011. The increase in total liabilities was primarily due to an increase in Loans Payable of $3.2 billion.
For the three months ended June 30, 2012, we had Total Fee Related Revenues of $527.7 million and related expenses of $381.9 million, generating Fee Related Earnings of $145.7 million and Distributable Earnings of $188.4 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we had Total Fee Related Revenues of $1.0 billion and related expenses of $746.2 million, generating Fee Related Earnings of $292.7 million and Distributable Earnings of $350.5 million.
Sources of Liquidity
We have multiple sources of liquidity to meet our capital needs, including annual cash flows, accumulated earnings in the businesses, investments in our own Treasury and liquid funds and access to our debt capacity, including our $1.02 billion committed revolving credit facility and the proceeds from our 2009 and 2010 issuances of senior notes. On July 13, 2012, an indirect subsidiary of Blackstone amended its revolving credit
92
facility. The amendment is described in Note 11. “Borrowings.” in the “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” in Part I. Item 1. Financial Statements. As of June 30, 2012, Blackstone had $412.5 million in cash, $806.9 million invested in Blackstone’s Treasury cash management strategies, $131.6 million invested in liquid Blackstone Funds, $1.9 billion invested in illiquid Blackstone Funds and $142.1 million in other investments, against $1.0 billion in borrowings from our 2009 and 2010 bond issuances.
In addition to the cash we received in connection with our IPO, debt offering and our borrowing facilities, we expect to receive (a) cash generated from operating activities, (b) Carried Interest and incentive income realizations, and (c) realizations on the carry and hedge fund investments that we make. The amounts received from these three sources in particular may vary substantially from year to year and quarter to quarter depending on the frequency and size of realization events or net returns experienced by our investment funds. Our available capital could be adversely affected if there are prolonged periods of few substantial realizations from our investment funds accompanied by substantial capital calls for new investments from those investment funds. Therefore, Blackstone’s commitments to our funds are taken into consideration when managing our overall liquidity and cash position.
We use Distributable Earnings, which is derived from our segment reported results, as a supplemental non-GAAP measure to assess performance and amounts available for distributions to Blackstone unitholders, including Blackstone personnel and others who are limited partners of the Blackstone Holdings partnerships. Distributable Earnings is intended to show the amount of net realized earnings without the effects of the consolidation of the Blackstone Funds. Distributable Earnings is derived from and reconciled to, but not equivalent to, its most directly comparable GAAP measure of Income (Loss) Before Provision for Taxes. Distributable Earnings, which is a component of Economic Net Income, is the sum across all segments of: (a) Total Management and Advisory Fees, (b) Interest and Dividend Revenue, (c) Other Revenue, (d) Realized Performance Fees, and (e) Realized Investment Income (Loss); less (a) Compensation, (b) Realized Performance Fee Compensation, (c) Other Operating Expenses and (d) Taxes and Related Payables including the Payable Under the Tax Receivable Agreement.
The following table calculates Blackstone’s Fee Related Earnings, Distributable Earnings and Economic Net Income:
Base Management Fees (a)
Transaction and Other Fees, Net (a)
Advisory Fees (a)
Management Fee Offsets (a)
Interest Income and Other Revenue (b)
Compensation (a)
Other Operating Expenses (a)
Net Realized Incentive Fees (b)
Net Realized Carried Interest (b)
Realized Investment Income (b)
Taxes and Related Payables (c)
Net Unrealized Incentive Fees (b)
Net Unrealized Carried Interest (b)
Unrealized Investment Income (b)
Add Back: Related Payables (d)
Economic Net Income
93
The following calculates the components of Fee Related Earnings, Distributable Earnings and Economic Net Income in the above table identified by note (b):
Interest Income and Dividend Revenue (a)
Other Revenue (a)
Interest Income (Loss) — Blackstone’s Treasury Cash Management Strategies (b)
Interest Income and Other Revenue
Realized Incentive Fees (a)
Less: Realized Incentive Fee Compensation (a)
Net Realized Incentive Fees
Realized Carried Interest (a)
Less: Realized Carried Interest Compensation (a)
Net Realized Carried Interest
Realized Investment Income (a)
Adjustment Related to Realized Investment Income — Blackstone’s Treasury Cash Management Strategies (c)
Realized Investment Income
Unrealized Incentive Fees (a)
Less: Unrealized Incentive Fee Compensation (a)
Net Unrealized Incentive Fees
Unrealized Carried Interest (a)
Less: Unrealized Carried Interest Compensation (a)
Net Unrealized Carried Interest
Unrealized Investment Income (a)
Less: Investment Income (Loss) — Blackstone’s Treasury Cash Management Strategies (b)
Less: Adjustment Related to Realized Investment Income —Blackstone’s Treasury Cash Management Strategies (c)
Unrealized Investment Income (Loss)
94
The following table is a reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) Attributable to The Blackstone Group L.P. to Economic Income, of Economic Income to Economic Net Income, of Economic Net Income to Fee Related Earnings, of Fee Related Earnings to Distributable Earnings and of Distributable Earnings to Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization:
IPO and Acquisition-Related Charges (a)
Amortization of Intangibles (b)
Income (Loss) Associated with Non-Controlling Interests in (Income) Loss of Consolidated Entities (c)
Taxes (d)
Performance Fee Adjustment (e)
Investment Income (Loss) Adjustment (f)
Investment Income (Loss) — Blackstone’s Treasury Cash Management Strategies (g)
Performance Fee Compensation and Benefits Adjustment (h)
Realized Performance Fees (i)
Realized Investment Income (j)
Adjustment Related to Realized Investment Income — Blackstone’s Treasury Cash Management Strategies (k)
Taxes and Related Payables Including Payable Under Tax Receivable Agreement (l)
Interest
Depreciation and Amortization
Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization
95
96
Liquidity Needs
We expect that our primary liquidity needs will be cash to (a) provide capital to facilitate the growth of our existing businesses which principally includes funding our general partner and co-investment commitments to our funds, (b) provide capital to facilitate our expansion into new businesses that are complementary, (c) pay operating expenses, including cash compensation to our employees and other obligations as they arise, (d) fund modest capital expenditures, (e) repay borrowings and related interest costs, (f) pay income taxes and (g) make distributions to our unitholders and the holders of Blackstone Holdings Partnership Units. Our own capital commitments to our funds, the funds we invest in and our investment strategies as of June 30, 2012 consisted of the following:
BCP VI
BCOM
Blackstone Energy Partners (“BEP”)
China Fund (“RMB”)
Blackstone Tactical Opportunity Fund
Woori Blackstone Korea I
Blackstone Clean Technology Partners
Real Estate Funds
BREP VII
BREP International II
BREP Europe III
Blackstone Real Estate Special Situations Fund II
Blackstone Real Estate Special Situations Fund G
Blackstone Commercial Real Estate Debt Fund
Strategic Alliance II
Strategic Alliance
Capital Opportunities Fund II L.P. (“COF”)
Blackstone / GSO Capital Solutions
BMezz
Blackstone Credit Liquidity Partners
BMezz II
Other (a)
For some of the general partner commitments shown in the table above we require our senior managing directors and certain other professionals to fund a portion of the commitment even though the ultimate obligation to fund the aggregate commitment is ours pursuant to the governing agreements of the respective funds. For BCP VI, BREP VI, BREP Europe III, BREP VII and COF II, it is intended that our senior managing directors and certain other professionals will fund $250 million, $150 million, $35 million, $100 million, and
97
$96.1 million, respectively, of the aggregate applicable general partner original commitment shown above. In addition, certain senior managing directors and other professionals are required to fund a de minimis amount of the commitment in the other private equity, real estate and credit-oriented carry funds. We expect our commitments to be drawn down over time and to be funded by available cash and cash generated from operations and realizations. Taking into account prevailing market conditions and both the liquidity and cash or liquid investment balances, we believe that the sources of liquidity described below will be more than sufficient to fund our working capital requirements.
On March 23, 2010, indirect subsidiaries of Blackstone entered into an unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent. On November 23, 2010, the Credit Facility was amended to set the facility aggregate borrowing limit at $1.02 billion. On April 8, 2011, the Credit Facility was amended to extend the maturity date from March 23, 2013 to April 8, 2016. On July 13, 2012, the Credit Facility was further amended to increase the borrowing capacity from $1.02 billion to $1.1 billion and to extend the maturity date from April 8, 2016 to July 13, 2017. Borrowings may also be made in U.K. Sterling or Euros, in each case subject to certain sub-limits. The Credit Facility contains customary representations, covenants and events of default. Financial covenants consist of a maximum net leverage ratio and a requirement to keep a minimum amount of fee generating assets under management, each tested quarterly.
In August 2009, Blackstone Holdings Finance Co. L.L.C. issued $600 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.625% Senior Notes which will mature on August 15, 2019, unless earlier redeemed or repurchased. In September 2010, Blackstone Holdings Finance Co. L.L.C. issued $400 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.875% Senior Notes which will mature on March 15, 2021, unless earlier redeemed or repurchased. (Both issuances of Senior Notes are collectively referred to as the “Notes”.) The notes are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of Blackstone Holdings Finance Co. L.L.C. and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, by The Blackstone Group L.P. and each of the Blackstone Holdings partnerships. The Notes contain customary covenants and financial restrictions that among other things limit Blackstone Holdings Finance Co. L.L.C. and the guarantors’ ability, subject to certain exceptions, to incur indebtedness secured by liens on voting stock or profit participating equity interests of their subsidiaries or merge, consolidate or sell, transfer or lease assets. The Notes also contain customary events of default. All or a portion of the Notes may be redeemed at our option, in whole or in part, at any time and from time to time, prior to their stated maturity, at the make-whole redemption price set forth in the Notes. If a change of control repurchase event occurs, the Notes are subject to repurchase at the repurchase price as set forth in the Notes.
In January 2008, the Board of Directors of our general partner, Blackstone Group Management L.L.C., authorized the repurchase of up to $500 million of our common units and Blackstone Holdings Partnership Units. Under this unit repurchase program, units may be repurchased from time to time in open market transactions, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. The timing and the actual number of Blackstone common units and Blackstone Holdings Partnership Units repurchased will depend on a variety of factors, including legal requirements, price and economic and market conditions. This unit repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time and does not have a specified expiration date. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, no units were repurchased. As of June 30, 2012, the amount remaining available for repurchases was $335.8 million under this program.
Distributable Earnings will only be a starting point for our determination of the amount to be distributed to unitholders because as noted above, in determining the amount to be distributed we will subtract from Distributable Earnings any amounts determined by our general partner to be necessary or appropriate to provide for the conduct of our business, to make appropriate investments in our business and our funds, to comply with applicable law or any of our debt instruments or other agreements, or to provide for future distributions to our unitholders for any ensuing quarter. In most years the aggregate amounts of our distributions to unitholders will typically be less than our Distributable Earnings for that year.
98
Our current intention is to distribute to our common unitholders substantially all of The Blackstone Group L.P.’s net after-tax share of our annual Distributable Earnings less the amount of our realized investment gains and returns of capital from investments and acquisitions. This determination has been based on the continued pace of organic and inorganic growth and the potential for further strategic initiatives and the retained amount will be used for those purposes. The retained cash will be deducted from the fourth quarter distribution which is made in the first quarter of the ensuing calendar year. All distributions are subject to Blackstone’s discretion to retain additional amounts from the amount of annual Distributable Earnings to be distributed as described above.
Because we will not know what our Distributable Earnings will be for any fiscal year until the end of such year, we expect that our first three quarterly distributions in respect of any given year will remain unchanged at $0.10 per unit. For the fourth quarter of each year, we expect to pay the remaining amount of the year’s Distributable Earnings less realized investment gains and returns of capital from investments and acquisitions. As such, the distributions for the first three quarters are expected to be smaller than the final quarterly distribution in respect of such year.
All of the foregoing is subject to the qualification that the declaration and payment of any distributions are at the sole discretion of our general partner and our general partner may change our distribution policy at any time.
Because the subsidiaries of The Blackstone Group L.P. must pay taxes and make payments under the tax receivable agreements described in Blackstone’s 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K, the amounts ultimately distributed by The Blackstone Group L.P. to its common unitholders in respect of each fiscal year are expected to be less, on a per unit basis, than the amounts distributed by the Blackstone Holdings partnerships to the Blackstone personnel and others who are limited partners of the Blackstone Holdings partnerships in respect of their Blackstone Holdings partnership units.
Leverage
We may under certain circumstances use leverage opportunistically and over time to create the most efficient capital structure for Blackstone and our public common unitholders, including through the issuance of debt securities. As of June 30, 2012, we had total partners’ capital of $9.0 billion, including $412.5 million in cash, $806.9 million invested in Blackstone’s Treasury cash management strategies, $131.6 million invested in liquid Blackstone Funds, $1.9 billion invested in illiquid Blackstone Funds and $142.1 million in other investments, against $1.0 billion in borrowings from our 2009 and 2010 bond issuances.
Included in our Treasury cash management strategies are reverse repurchase agreements, repurchase agreements and securities sold, not yet purchased. All of these positions are held in a separately managed portfolio. Reverse repurchase agreements are entered into primarily to take advantage of opportunistic yields otherwise absent in the overnight markets and also to use the collateral received to cover securities sold, not yet purchased. Repurchase agreements are entered into primarily to opportunistically yield higher spreads on purchased securities. The balances held in these financial instruments fluctuate based on Blackstone’s liquidity needs, market conditions and investment risk profiles. The following table presents information regarding these financial instruments:
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
Average Daily Balance
Maximum Daily Balance
99
Our private equity funds, real estate funds and funds of hedge funds have not historically utilized substantial leverage at the fund level other than (a) for short-term borrowings between the date of an investment and the receipt of capital from the investing fund’s investors, and (b) long-term borrowings for certain investments in aggregate amounts which are generally 2% to 10% of the capital commitments of the respective fund. Our carry funds make direct or indirect investments in companies that utilize leverage in their capital structure. The degree of leverage employed varies among portfolio companies.
Certain of our Hedge Fund Solutions and Credit Businesses funds use leverage in order to obtain additional market exposure, enhance returns on invested capital and/or to bridge short-term cash needs. The forms of leverage primarily employed by these funds include purchasing securities on margin, utilizing collateralized financing and using derivative instruments.
Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Contingencies
The following table sets forth information relating to our contractual obligations as of June 30, 2012 on a consolidated basis and on a basis deconsolidating the Blackstone funds:
Contractual Obligations
Operating Lease Obligations (a)
Purchase Obligations
Blackstone Issued Notes and Revolving Credit Facility (b)
Interest on Blackstone Issued Notes and Revolving Credit Facility (c)
Blackstone Operating Entities Loan and Credit Facilities Payable (d)
Interest on Blackstone Operating Entities Loan and Credit Facilities Payable (e)
Blackstone Funds and CLO Vehicles Debt Obligations Payable (f)
Interest on Blackstone Funds and CLO Vehicles Debt Obligations Payable (g)
Blackstone Funds Capital Commitments to Investee Funds (h)
Due to Certain Non-Controlling Interest Holders in Connection with Tax Receivable Agreements (i)
Blackstone Operating Entities Capital Commitments to Blackstone Funds and Other (j)
Unrecognized Tax Benefits, Including Interest (k)
Consolidated Contractual Obligations
Blackstone Operating Entities Contractual Obligations
We lease our primary office space under agreements that expire through 2024. In connection with certain lease agreements, we are responsible for escalation payments. The contractual obligation table above includes only guaranteed
100
Blackstone and certain of its consolidated funds provide financial guarantees. The amounts and nature of these guarantees are described in Note 16. “Commitments and Contingencies – Contingencies – Guarantees” in the “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” in “Part I. Item 1. Financial Statements” of this filing.
Indemnifications
In many of its service contracts, Blackstone agrees to indemnify the third party service provider under certain circumstances. The terms of the indemnities vary from contract to contract and the amount of indemnification liability, if any, cannot be determined and has not been included in the table above or recorded in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of June 30, 2012.
101
Clawback Obligations
The actual clawback liability, however, does not become realized until the end of a fund’s life except for Blackstone’s real estate funds which may have an interim clawback liability come due after a realized loss is incurred, depending on the fund. The lives of the carry funds with a potential clawback obligation, including available contemplated extensions, are currently anticipated to expire at various points beginning toward the end of 2012 and extending through 2018. Further extensions of such terms may be implemented under given circumstances.
As of June 30, 2012, the clawback obligations were $261.0 million, of which $100.2 million related to Blackstone Holdings and $160.8 million relate to current and former Blackstone personnel. (See Note 15. “Related Party Transactions” and Note 16. “Commitments and Contingencies” in the “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” in “Part I. Item 1. Financial Statements” of this filing.)
Critical Accounting Policies
We prepare our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). In applying many of these accounting principles, we need to make assumptions, estimates and/or judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses in our consolidated financial statements. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. These assumptions, estimates and/or judgments, however, are often subjective. Actual results may be affected negatively based on changing circumstances. If actual amounts are ultimately different from our estimates, the revisions are included in our results of operations for the period in which the actual amounts become known. We believe the following critical accounting policies could potentially produce materially different results if we were to change underlying assumptions, estimates and/or judgments. (See Note 2. “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” in “Part I. Item 1. Financial Statements” of this filing.)
Principles of Consolidation
The Partnership consolidates all entities that it controls through a majority voting interest or otherwise, including those Blackstone Funds in which the general partner is presumed to have control. Although the Partnership has a non-controlling interest in the Blackstone Holdings partnerships, the limited partners do not have the right to dissolve the partnerships or have substantive kick out rights or participating rights that would overcome the presumption of control by the Partnership. Accordingly, the Partnership consolidates Blackstone Holdings and records non-controlling interests to reflect the economic interests of the limited partners of Blackstone Holdings. Income (Loss) attributable to Blackstone Holdings, excluding certain costs and expenses borne directly by Blackstone Holdings, is calculated based on the weighted average number of Blackstone Holdings partnership units held by the Founder, other senior managing directors and employees.
In addition, the Partnership consolidates all variable interest entities (“VIE”) in which it is the primary beneficiary. An enterprise is determined to be the primary beneficiary if it holds a controlling financial interest. A controlling financial interest is defined as (a) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance, and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The consolidation guidance requires an analysis to (a) determine whether an entity in which the Partnership holds a variable interest is a VIE,
102
and (b) whether the Partnership’s involvement, through holding interests directly or indirectly in the entity or contractually through other variable interests (e.g., management and performance related fees), would give it a controlling financial interest. Performance of that analysis requires the exercise of judgment. VIEs qualify for the deferral of the consolidation guidance if all of the following conditions have been met:
The entity has all of the attributes of an investment company as defined under AICPA Accounting and Auditing Guide, Investment Companies(“Investment Company Guide”), or does not have all the attributes of an investment company but it is an entity for which it is acceptable based on industry practice to apply measurement principles that are consistent with the Investment Company Guide,
The reporting entity does not have explicit or implicit obligations to fund any losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the entity, and
The entity is not a securitization or asset-backed financing entity or an entity that was formerly considered a qualifying special purpose entity.
Where the VIEs have qualified for the deferral of the consolidation guidance as discussed in Note 2. “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” in “Part I. Item 1. Financial Statements”, the analysis is based on previous consolidation guidance. This guidance requires an analysis to determine (a) whether an entity in which the Partnership holds a variable interest is a variable interest entity and (b) whether the Partnership’s involvement, through holding interests directly or indirectly in the entity or contractually through other variable interests (e.g., management and performance related fees), would be expected to absorb a majority of the variability of the entity. Under both guidelines, the Partnership determines whether it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE at the time it becomes involved with a variable interest entity and reconsiders that conclusion continuously. In evaluating whether the Partnership is the primary beneficiary, Blackstone evaluates its economic interests in the entity held either directly by the Partnership and its affiliates or indirectly through employees. The consolidation analysis can generally be performed qualitatively; however, if it is not readily apparent that the Partnership is not the primary beneficiary, a quantitative analysis may also be performed. Investments and redemptions (either by the Partnership, affiliates of the Partnership or third parties) or amendments to the governing documents of the respective Blackstone Funds could affect an entity’s status as a VIE or the determination of the primary beneficiary. At each reporting date, the Partnership assesses whether it is the primary beneficiary and will consolidate or deconsolidate accordingly.
Assets of consolidated VIEs that can only be used to settle obligations of the consolidated VIE and liabilities of a consolidated VIE for which creditors (or beneficial interest holders) do not have recourse to the general credit of Blackstone are presented in a separate section in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues primarily consist of management and advisory fees, performance fees, investment income, interest and dividend revenue and other.
Please refer to “Part I. Item 1. Business – Incentive Arrangements / Fee Structure” in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding the manner in which Base Management Fees and Performance Fees are generated.
Management and Advisory Fees – Management and Advisory Fees are comprised of management fees, including base management fees, transaction and other fees, management fee reductions and offsets, and advisory fees.
103
The Partnership earns base management fees from limited partners of funds in each of its managed funds, at a fixed percentage of assets under management, net asset value, total assets, committed capital, invested capital or, in some cases, a fixed-fee. Base management fees are based on contractual terms specified in the underlying investment advisory agreements. The range of management fee rates and the calculation base from which they are earned, generally, are as follows:
On private equity, real estate, and certain credit-oriented funds:
0.30% to 1.75% of committed capital or invested capital during the commitment period,
0.50% to 1.75% of invested capital subsequent to the investment period for private equity and real estate funds, and
1.00% to 1.50% of invested capital or net asset value for certain credit-oriented funds.
On credit-oriented funds structured like hedge funds:
0.75% to 2.00% of net asset value.
On credit-oriented funds separately managed accounts:
0.35% to 1.00% of net asset value.
On funds of hedge funds and separately managed accounts invested in hedge funds:
0.50% to 1.25% of assets under management.
On CLO vehicles:
0.40% to 1.25% of total assets.
On closed-end mutual funds and registered investment companies:
0.50% to 1.50% of fund assets.
104
Carried Interest is realized when an underlying investment is profitably disposed of and the fund’s cumulative returns are in excess of the preferred return. Performance fees earned on hedge fund structures are realized at the end of each fund’s measurement period.
Other Revenue – Other Revenue consists of foreign exchange gains and losses arising on transactions denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars and other revenues.
105
Our expenses include compensation and benefits expense and general and administrative expenses. Our accounting policies related thereto are as follows:
Equity-Based Compensation — Compensation cost relating to the issuance of share-based awards to senior management and employees is measured at fair value at the grant date, taking into consideration expected forfeitures, and expensed over the vesting period on a straight line basis. Equity-based awards that do not require future service are expensed immediately. Cash settled equity-based awards are classified as liabilities and are re-measured at the end of each reporting period.
Level I – Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical financial instruments as of the reporting date. The type of financial instruments in Level I include listed equities, listed derivatives and mutual funds with quoted prices. The Partnership does not adjust the quoted price for these investments, even in situations where Blackstone holds a large position and a sale could reasonably impact the quoted price.
Level II – Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date, and fair value is determined through the use of models or other valuation methodologies. Financial instruments which are generally included in this category include corporate bonds and loans, government and agency securities, less liquid and restricted equity securities, certain over-the-counter derivatives where the fair value is based on observable inputs, and certain fund of hedge funds and proprietary investments in which Blackstone has the ability to redeem its investment at net asset value at, or within three months of, the reporting date.
Level III – Pricing inputs are unobservable for the financial instruments and includes situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the financial instrument. The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation. Financial instruments that are included in this category generally include general and limited partnership interests in private equity and real estate funds, credit-oriented funds, distressed debt and non-investment grade residual interests
106
in securitizations, corporate bonds and loans held within CLO vehicles, certain over the counter derivatives where the fair value is based on unobservable inputs and certain funds of hedge funds which use net asset value per share to determine fair value in which Blackstone may not have the ability to redeem its investment at net asset value at, or within three months of, the reporting date. Blackstone may not have the ability to redeem its investment at net asset value at, or within three months of, the reporting date if an investee fund manager has the ability to limit the amount of redemptions, and/or the ability to side-pocket investments, irrespective of whether such ability has been exercised. Senior and subordinate notes issued by CLO vehicles may also be classified within Level III of the fair value hierarchy.
Freestanding Derivatives and Derivative Instruments Used in Fair Value Hedging Strategies are valued using contractual cash flows and observable inputs comprising yield curves, foreign currency rates and credit spreads.
In certain cases, debt and equity securities are valued on the basis of prices from an orderly transaction between market participants provided by reputable dealers or pricing services. In determining the value of a particular investment, pricing services may use certain information with respect to transactions in such investments, quotations from dealers, pricing matrices, market transactions in comparable investments and various relationships between investments.
In the absence of observable market prices, Blackstone values its investments using valuation methodologies applied on a consistent basis. For some investments little market activity may exist;
107
management’s determination of fair value is then based on the best information available in the circumstances, and may incorporate management’s own assumptions and involves a significant degree of judgment, taking into consideration a combination of internal and external factors, including the appropriate risk adjustments for non-performance and liquidity risks. Investments for which market prices are not observable include private investments in the equity of operating companies, real estate properties, certain funds of hedge funds and credit-oriented investments.
Real Estate Investments — The fair values of real estate investments are determined by considering projected operating cash flows, sales of comparable assets, if any, and replacement costs among other measures. The methods used to estimate the fair value of real estate investments include the discounted cash flow method and/or capitalization rates (“cap rates”) analysis. Valuations may be derived by reference to observable valuation measures for comparable companies or assets (e.g., multiplying a key performance metric of the investee company or asset, such as EBITDA, by a relevant valuation multiple observed in the range of comparable companies or transactions), adjusted by management for differences between the investment and the referenced comparables, and in some instances by reference to option pricing models or other similar methods. Additionally, where applicable, projected distributable cash flow through debt maturity will also be considered in support of the investment’s carrying value.
Certain investments of Blackstone and of the consolidated Blackstone funds of hedge funds and credit-oriented funds measure their investments in underlying funds at fair value using NAV per share without adjustment. The terms of the investee’s investment generally provide for minimum holding periods or lock-ups, the institution of gates on redemptions or the suspension of redemptions or an ability to side-pocket investments, at the discretion of the investee’s fund manager, and as a result, investments may not be redeemable at, or within three months of, the reporting date. A side-pocket is used by hedge funds and funds of hedge funds to separate investments that may lack a readily ascertainable value, are illiquid or are subject to liquidity restriction. Redemptions are generally not permitted until the investments within a side pocket are liquidated or it is deemed that the conditions existing at the time that required the investment to be included in the side pocket no longer exist. As the timing of either of these events is uncertain, the timing at which the Partnership may redeem an investment held in a side-pocket cannot be estimated. Investments for which fair value is measured using NAV per share are reflected within the fair value hierarchy based on the observability of pricing inputs as described above. Further disclosure on instruments for which fair value is measured using NAV per share is presented in Note 5. “Net Asset Value as Fair Value” in the “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” in “Part I. Item 1. Financial Statements” of this filing.
108
The Blackstone Funds are accounted for as investment companies under the Investment Company Guide, and reflect their investments, including majority-owned and controlled investments (the “Portfolio Companies”), at fair value. Blackstone has retained the specialized accounting for the consolidated Blackstone Funds. Thus, such consolidated funds’ investments are reflected in Investments on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses resulting from changes in fair value reflected as a component of Net Gains from Fund Investment Activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Fair value is the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e., the exit price).
In addition, the Partnership has elected the fair value option for the assets and liabilities of CLO vehicles that are consolidated as of January 1, 2010, as a result of the initial adoption of variable interest entity consolidation guidance. The Partnership has also elected the fair value option for CLO vehicles consolidated as a result of the acquisitions of CLO management contracts. The adjustment resulting from the difference between the fair value of assets and liabilities for each of these events is presented as a transition and acquisition
109
adjustment to Appropriated Partners’ Capital. Assets of the consolidated CLOs are presented within Investments within the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and Liabilities within Loans Payable for the amounts due to unaffiliated third parties and Due to Affiliates for the amounts held by non-consolidated affiliates. The methodology for measuring the fair value of such assets and liabilities is consistent with the methodology applied to private equity, real estate, and credit-oriented investments. Changes in the fair value of consolidated CLO assets and liabilities and related interest, dividend and other income subsequent to adoption and acquisition are presented within Net Gains from Fund Investment Activities. Amounts attributable to Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities have a corresponding adjustment to Appropriated Partners’ Capital.
Further disclosure on instruments for which the fair value option has been elected is presented in Note 7. “Fair Value Option” in the “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” in “Part I. Item 1. Financial Statements” of this filing.
Intangibles and Goodwill
Blackstone’s intangible assets consist of contractual rights to earn future fee income, including management and advisory fees and Carried Interest from its Carry Funds. Identifiable finite-lived intangible assets are amortized on a straight line basis over their estimated useful lives, ranging from 4 to 20 years, reflecting the contractual lives of such funds. Amortization expense is included within General, Administrative and Other in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Partnership does not hold any indefinite-lived intangible assets.
Goodwill comprises goodwill arising from the contribution and reorganization of the Partnership’s predecessor entities in 2007 immediately prior to its IPO and the acquisition of GSO in 2008.
The carrying value of goodwill was $1.7 billion as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Intangible Assets and Goodwill are reviewed for impairment at least annually, or more frequently if circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the fair value of the Partnership’s operating segments substantially exceeded their respective carrying values.
We test goodwill for impairment at the operating segment level (the same as our segments). Management has organized the firm into five operating segments. All of the components in each segment have similar economic characteristics and management makes key operating decisions based on the performance of each segment. Therefore, we believe that operating segment is the appropriate reporting level for testing the impairment of goodwill. In determining fair value for each of our segments, we utilize a discounted cash flow methodology based on the adjusted cash flows from operations for each segment. We believe this method provides the best approximation of fair value. In calculating the discounted cash flows, we begin with the adjusted cash flows from operations of each segment. We then determine the most likely growth rate by operating segment for each of the next four years and assume a terminal value by segment. We do not apply a control premium. The discounted cash flow analysis includes the Blackstone issued notes and borrowings under the revolving credit facility, if any, and includes an allocation of interest expense to each segment for the unused commitment fee on Blackstone’s revolving credit facility. We use a discount rate that reflects the weighted average cost of capital adjusted for the risks inherent in the future cash flows.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the normal course of business, we enter into various off-balance sheet arrangements including sponsoring and owning limited or general partner interests in consolidated and non-consolidated funds, entering into derivative transactions, entering into operating leases, and entering into guarantee arrangements. We also have ongoing capital commitment arrangements with certain of our consolidated and non-consolidated drawdown funds. We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that would require us to fund losses or guarantee target returns to investors in our funds.
110
Further disclosure on our off-balance sheet arrangements is presented in the “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” in “Part I. Item 1. Financial Statements” of this filing as follows:
Note 6. “Derivative Financial Instruments”,
Note 9. “Variable Interest Entities”, and
Note 16. “Commitments and Contingencies — Commitments — Investment Commitments” and “— Contingencies — Guarantees”.
Information regarding recent accounting developments and their impact on Blackstone can be found in Note 2. “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” in “Part I. Item 1. Financial Statements.”
Our predominant exposure to market risk is related to our role as general partner or investment adviser to the Blackstone Funds and the sensitivities to movements in the fair value of their investments, including the effect on management fees, performance fees and investment income.
Although the Blackstone Funds share many common themes, each of our alternative asset management operations runs its own investment and risk management processes, subject to our overall risk tolerance and philosophy:
The investment process of our carry funds involves a detailed analysis of potential investments, and asset management teams are assigned to oversee the operations, strategic development, financing and capital deployment decisions of each portfolio investment. Key investment decisions are subject to approval by the applicable investment committee, which is comprised of Blackstone senior managing directors and senior management.
In our capacity as advisor to certain of our hedge fund solutions and credit businesses funds, we continuously monitor a variety of markets for attractive trading opportunities, applying a number of traditional and customized risk management metrics to analyze risk related to specific assets or portfolios. In addition, we perform extensive credit and cash-flow analyses of borrowers, credit-based assets and underlying hedge fund managers, and have extensive asset management teams that monitor covenant compliance by, and relevant financial data of, borrowers and other obligors, asset pool performance statistics, tracking of cash payments relating to investments and ongoing analysis of the credit status of investments.
Effect on Fund Management Fees
Our management fees are based on (a) third parties’ capital commitments to a Blackstone Fund, (b) third parties’ capital invested in a Blackstone Fund or (c) the net asset value, or NAV, of a Blackstone Fund, as described in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Management fees will only be directly affected by short-term changes in market conditions to the extent they are based on NAV or represent permanent impairments of value. These management fees will be increased (or reduced) in direct proportion to the effect of changes in the market value of our investments in the related funds. The proportion of our management fees that are based on NAV is dependent on the number and types of Blackstone Funds in existence and the current stage of each fund’s life cycle. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011, the approximate percentage of our fund management fees based on the NAV of the applicable funds or separately managed accounts, were as follows:
Fund Management Fees Based on the NAV of the Applicable Funds or Separately Managed Accounts
111
Market Risk
The Blackstone Funds hold investments which are reported at fair value. Based on the fair value as of June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011, we estimate that a 10% decline in fair value of the investments would have the following effects:
10% Decline in Fair Value of the Investments
Total assets under management, excluding undrawn capital commitments and the amount of capital raised for our CLOs, by segment, and the percentage amount classified as Level III investments as defined within the fair value standards of GAAP, are as follows:
The fair value of our investments and securities can vary significantly based on a number of factors that take into consideration the diversity of the Blackstone Funds’ investment portfolio and on a number of factors and inputs such as similar transactions, financial metrics, and industry comparatives, among others. (See “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Also see “Part I, Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies—Investments, at Fair Value.”) We believe these fair value amounts should be utilized with caution as our intent and strategy is to hold investments and securities until prevailing market conditions are beneficial for investment sales.
Investors in all of our carry funds (and certain of our credit-oriented funds and funds of hedge funds) make capital commitments to those funds that we are entitled to call from those investors at any time during prescribed periods. We depend on investors fulfilling their commitments when we call capital from them in order for those funds to consummate investments and otherwise pay their related obligations when due, including management fees. We have not had investors fail to honor capital calls to any meaningful extent and any investor that did not fund a capital call would be subject to having a significant amount of its existing investment forfeited in that fund. But if investors were to fail to satisfy a significant amount of capital calls for any particular fund or funds, those funds could be materially and adversely affected.
112
Exchange Rate Risk
The Blackstone Funds hold investments that are denominated in non-U.S. dollar currencies that may be affected by movements in the rate of exchange between the U.S. dollar and non-U.S. dollar currencies. Additionally, a portion of our management fees are denominated in non-U.S. dollar currencies. We estimate that as of June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011, a 10% decline in the rate of exchange of all foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar would have the following effects:
10% Decline in the Rate of Exchange of All Foreign Currencies Against the U.S. Dollar
Interest Rate Risk
Blackstone has debt obligations payable that accrue interest at variable rates. Interest rate changes may therefore affect the amount of interest payments, future earnings and cash flows. Based on our debt obligations payable as of June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011, we estimate that interest expense relating to variable rates would increase on an annual basis, in the event interest rates were to increase by one percentage point, as follows:
Increase in Interest Expense Due to a One Percentage Point Increase in Interest Rates
Blackstone’s Treasury cash management strategies consists of a diversified portfolio of liquid assets to meet the liquidity needs of various businesses (the “Treasury Liquidity Portfolio”). This portfolio includes cash, open-ended money market mutual funds, open-ended bond mutual funds, marketable investment securities, freestanding derivative contracts, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements and other investments. We estimate that our annualized investment income would decrease by $4.9 million, or 0.4% of the Treasury Liquidity Portfolio, if interest rates were to increase by one percentage point. This would be offset by an estimated increase in interest income of $2.6 million on an annual basis from interest on floating rate assets.
Credit Risk
Certain Blackstone Funds and the Investee Funds are subject to certain inherent risks through their investments.
The Treasury Liquidity Portfolio contains certain credit risks including, but not limited to, exposure to uninsured deposits with financial institutions, unsecured corporate bonds and mortgage-backed securities. These exposures are actively monitored on a continuous basis and positions are reallocated based on changes in risk profile, market or economic conditions.
We estimate that our investment income would decrease by $5.9 million, or 0.5% of the Treasury Liquidity Portfolio, if credit spreads were to increase by one percentage point.
113
Certain of our entities hold derivative instruments that contain an element of risk in the event that the counterparties may be unable to meet the terms of such agreements. We minimize our risk exposure by limiting the counterparties with which we enter into contracts to banks and investment banks who meet established credit and capital guidelines. We do not expect any counterparty to default on its obligations and therefore do not expect to incur any loss due to counterparty default.
We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired objectives.
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) are effective at the reasonable assurance level to accomplish their objectives of ensuring that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
No changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a–15(f) and 15d–15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during our most recent quarter, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
114
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
We may from time to time be involved in litigation and claims incidental to the conduct of our business. Our businesses are also subject to extensive regulation, which may result in regulatory proceedings against us. See “Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K. We are not currently subject to any pending judicial, administrative or arbitration proceedings that we expect to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, a purported class of shareholders in public companies acquired by one or more private equity firms filed a lawsuit against a number of private equity firms and investment banks, including The Blackstone Group L.P., in the United States District Court in Massachusetts (Kirk Dahl, et al. v. Bain Capital Partners, LLC, et al.). The suit alleges that, from mid-2003 through 2007, eleven defendants violated the antitrust laws by allegedly conspiring to rig bids, restrict the supply of private equity financing, fix the prices for target companies at artificially low levels, and divide up an alleged market for private equity services for leveraged buyouts. After the conclusion of discovery, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in June 2012, in which the plaintiffs seek damages on behalf of public shareholders that tendered their shares in connection with 17 leveraged buyouts. The court has dismissed claims against Blackstone with respect to four of these transactions because Blackstone was released from any and all claims by the same shareholders in prior litigation. Defendants have filed motions for summary judgment. The court has not yet established a schedule for determining whether to certify the shareholder class proposed by plaintiffs.
In the spring of 2008, six substantially identical complaints were brought against Blackstone and some of its executive officers purporting to be class actions on behalf of purchasers of common units in Blackstone’s June 2007 initial public offering. These suits were subsequently consolidated into one complaint (Landmen Partners Inc. v. The Blackstone Group L.P., et al.) filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in October 2008 against Blackstone, Stephen A. Schwarzman (Blackstone’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer), Peter G. Peterson (Blackstone’s former Senior Chairman), Hamilton E. James (Blackstone’s President and Chief Operating Officer) and Michael A. Puglisi (Blackstone’s Chief Financial Officer at the time of the IPO). The amended complaint alleged that (1) the IPO prospectus was false and misleading for failing to disclose that (a) one private equity investment would be adversely affected by trends in mortgage default rates, particularly for sub-prime mortgage loans, (b) another private equity investment was adversely affected by the loss of an exclusive manufacturing agreement, and (c) prior to the IPO the U.S. real estate market had started to deteriorate, adversely affecting the value of Blackstone’s real estate investments; and (2) the financial statements in the IPO prospectus were materially inaccurate principally because they overstated the value of the investments referred to in clause (1).
In September 2009 the District Court judge dismissed the complaint with prejudice, ruling that even if the allegations in the complaint were assumed to be true, the alleged omissions were immaterial. Analyzing both quantitative and qualitative factors, the District Court reasoned that the alleged omissions were immaterial as a matter of law given the size of the investments at issue relative to Blackstone as a whole, and taking into account Blackstone’s structure as an asset manager and financial advisory firm.
In February 2011, a three-judge panel of the Second Circuit reversed the District Court’s decision, ruling that the District Court incorrectly found that plaintiffs’ allegations were, if true, immaterial as a matter of law. The Second Circuit disagreed with the District Court, concluding that the complaint “plausibly” alleged that the initial public offering documents omitted material information concerning two of Blackstone funds’ individual investments and inadequately disclosed information relating to market risks to their real estate investments. Because this was a motion to dismiss, in reaching this decision the Second Circuit accepted all of the complaint’s factual allegations as true and drew every reasonable inference in plaintiffs’ favor. The Second Circuit did not consider facts other than those in the plaintiffs’ complaint. On June 28, 2011, defendants filed a petition for writ
115
of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court, which was subsequently denied. On August 8, 2011, defendants filed their answer to the complaint and discovery commenced and is continuing in this action.
In June 2011, three related suits (Walker, Truesdell, Roth & Assocs. v. The Blackstone Group L.P., et al.) were filed against Blackstone, various Blackstone entities including some of its private equity and real estate funds, and specified Blackstone personnel relating to the sale of Extended Stay Hotels in June 2007 by certain entities in which such Blackstone funds owned significant equity interests (the “2007 Sale”). Other defendants in such suits include the buyer of Extended Stay, financial advisors to both the sellers and the buyer and specified lenders for the purchase of Extended Stay. Extended Stay subsequently filed for bankruptcy in 2009, at which time it was still owned by the buyer pursuant to the 2007 Sale. The suits, which are in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, were brought by a litigation trust for the benefit of creditors of Extended Stay and allege that Extended Stay was rendered insolvent by the 2007 Sale. One suit includes asserted claims of fraudulent conveyance and seeks to recover $2.1 billion allegedly transferred to the sellers in the 2007 Sale. The other two suits contain the same allegations as the first suit, assert claims for breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, illegal distributions and other claims, and seek $2.1 billion in compensatory damages and $6.3 billion in punitive damages.
Blackstone believes that all of the foregoing suits are totally without merit and intends to defend them vigorously.
For a discussion of our potential risks and uncertainties, see the information under the heading “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 and in our subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, all of which are accessible on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at www.sec.gov.
See “Part I. Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Business Environment” in this report for a discussion of the conditions in the financial markets and economic conditions affecting our businesses. This discussion updates, and should be read together with, the risk factor entitled “Difficult market conditions can adversely affect our business in many ways, including by reducing the value or performance of the investments made by our investment funds, reducing the ability of our investment funds to raise or deploy capital and reducing the volume of the transactions involving our financial advisory business, each of which could materially reduce our revenue and cash flows and adversely affect our financial condition” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
The risks described in our Form 10-K and in our subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
In January 2008, the Board of Directors of our general partner, Blackstone Group Management L.L.C., authorized the repurchase of up to $500 million of Blackstone common units and Blackstone Holdings Partnership Units. Under this unit repurchase program, units may be repurchased in open market transactions, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. This unit repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time and does not have a specified expiration date. No purchases of our common units were made by us or on our behalf during the three months ended June 30, 2012. See “Part I. Item 1. Financial Statements – Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 13. Net Income (Loss) Per Common Unit” and “Part I. Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources – Our Sources of Cash and Liquidity Needs” for further information regarding this unit repurchase program.
116
As permitted by our policies and procedures governing transactions in our securities by our directors, executive officers and other employees, from time to time some of these persons may establish plans or arrangements complying with Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act, and similar plans and arrangements relating to our common units and Holdings units.
Not applicable.
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued amended guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income in financial statements. This accounting standard update requires entities to present total comprehensive income either in a single, continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate, but consecutive, statements. Blackstone adopted this standard as of January 1, 2012, and will present net income and other comprehensive income as a separate statement in our annual and interim financial statements. The table below reflects the retrospective application of this guidance for each of the three years ended December 31, 2011. The retrospective application did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax—Currency Translation Adjustment
117
The following tables present the financial data for Blackstone’s five segments for the indicated periods:
Interest Income and Dividend Revenue
118
119
120
121
122
123
Economic Income, Total Segments
124
125
126
127
128
129
The following tables present reconciliations of Net Income (Loss) Attributable to The Blackstone Group L.P. to Economic Income (Loss), of Economic Income (Loss) to Economic Net Income (Loss), of Economic Net Income (Loss) to Fee Related Earnings, of Fee Related Earnings to Distributable Earnings and of Distributable Earnings to Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization for the indicated periods:
Provision (Benefit) for Taxes
Income (Loss) Before Provision (Benefit) for Taxes
Economic Net Income (Loss)
Realized Investment Income (Loss) (j)
130
Net Loss Attributable to The Blackstone Group L.P.
Net Loss Attributable to Non-Controlling Interests in Blackstone Holdings
Net Loss
Other Adjustments
131
Amortization of non-cash deferred compensation included in Economic Income was $5.4 million, $6.6 million, $6.4 million, $66.3 million, $7.8 million and $6.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011, June 30, 2011, September 30, 2011, December 31, 2011, March 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012, respectively. Amortization of non-cash deferred compensation included in Economic Income was $84.6 million, $68.9 million, $66.8 million and $64.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
132
The following tables calculate Blackstone’s Fee Related Earnings, Distributable Earnings and Economic Net Income (Loss) for the indicated periods:
Unrealized Investment Income (Loss) (b)
Realized Investment Income (Loss) (b)
133
The following tables calculate the components of Fee Related Earnings, Distributable Earnings and Economic Net Income (Loss) in the above tables identified by note (b) for the indicated periods:
Unrealized Investment Income (Loss) (a)
Less: Adjustment Related to Realized Investment Income — Blackstone’s Treasury Cash Management Strategies (c)
134
Realized Carried Interest (Loss) (a)
Realized Investment Income (Loss) (a)
Realized Investment Income (Loss)
135
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit Description
The agreements and other documents filed as exhibits to this report are not intended to provide factual information or other disclosure other than with respect to the terms of the agreements or other documents themselves, and you should not rely on them for that purpose. In particular, any representations and warranties made by us in these agreements or other documents were made solely within the specific context of the relevant agreement or document and may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time.
136
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: August 7, 2012
/s/ LAURENCE A. TOSI
137