Companies:
10,793
total market cap:
$134.237 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ USD
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
Bloomin' Brands
BLMN
#7298
Rank
$0.46 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
$5.49
Share price
0.18%
Change (1 day)
-16.06%
Change (1 year)
๐ Restaurant chains
๐ด Food
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Annual Reports (10-K)
Bloomin' Brands
Quarterly Reports (10-Q)
Financial Year FY2015 Q2
Bloomin' Brands - 10-Q quarterly report FY2015 Q2
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
[X]
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 28, 2015
or
[ ]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ______ to ______
Commission File Number: 001-35625
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
20-8023465
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
2202 North West Shore Boulevard, Suite 500, Tampa, Florida 33607
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(813) 282-1225
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES
x
NO
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES
x
NO
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
x
Accelerated filer
o
Non-accelerated filer
o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES
o
NO
x
As of
July 30, 2015
,
122,637,497
shares of common stock of the registrant were outstanding.
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
For the Quarterly Period Ended
June 28, 2015
(Unaudited)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Page No.
Item 1.
Financial Statements
3
Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited):
Consolidated Balance Sheets — June 28, 2015 and December 28, 2014
3
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income —
For the Thirteen and Twenty-Six Weeks Ended June 28, 2015 and June 29, 2014
5
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity —
For the Thirteen and Twenty-Six Weeks Ended June 28, 2015 and June 29, 2014
6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows —
For the Twenty-Six Weeks Ended June 28, 2015 and June 29, 2014
8
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
10
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
25
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
50
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
51
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
52
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
52
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
52
Item 6.
Exhibits
53
Signature
54
2
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA, UNAUDITED)
JUNE 28,
DECEMBER 28,
2015
2014
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
132,772
$
165,744
Current portion of restricted cash and cash equivalents
4,356
6,829
Inventories
72,068
80,817
Deferred income tax assets
126,186
123,866
Assets held for sale
2,106
16,667
Other current assets, net
108,993
206,628
Total current assets
446,481
600,551
Restricted cash
24,035
25,451
Property, fixtures and equipment, net
1,632,325
1,629,311
Goodwill
318,206
341,540
Intangible assets, net
563,935
585,432
Deferred income tax assets
5,404
6,038
Other assets, net
154,349
155,963
Total assets
$
3,144,735
$
3,344,286
(CONTINUED...)
3
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA, UNAUDITED)
JUNE 28,
DECEMBER 28,
2015
2014
LIABILITIES, MEZZANINE EQUITY AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable
$
202,663
$
191,207
Accrued and other current liabilities
208,613
237,844
Current portion of partner deposits and accrued partner obligations
7,147
8,399
Unearned revenue
258,471
376,696
Current portion of long-term debt, net
25,602
25,964
Total current liabilities
702,496
840,110
Partner deposits and accrued partner obligations
60,011
69,766
Deferred rent
135,070
121,819
Deferred income tax liabilities
178,631
181,125
Long-term debt, net
1,295,315
1,289,879
Other long-term liabilities, net
252,794
260,405
Total liabilities
2,624,317
2,763,104
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
Mezzanine Equity
Redeemable noncontrolling interests
24,470
24,733
Stockholders’ Equity
Bloomin’ Brands Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding as of June 28, 2015 and December 28, 2014
—
—
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 475,000,000 shares authorized; 122,625,374 and 125,949,870 shares issued and outstanding as of June 28, 2015 and December 28, 2014, respectively
1,226
1,259
Additional paid-in capital
1,088,075
1,085,627
Accumulated deficit
(482,664
)
(474,994
)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(115,354
)
(60,542
)
Total Bloomin’ Brands stockholders’ equity
491,283
551,350
Noncontrolling interests
4,665
5,099
Total stockholders’ equity
495,948
556,449
Total liabilities, mezzanine equity and stockholders’ equity
$
3,144,735
$
3,344,286
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA, UNAUDITED)
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Revenues
Restaurant sales
$
1,092,759
$
1,104,437
$
2,287,569
$
2,254,962
Other revenues
6,838
6,475
14,087
13,809
Total revenues
1,099,597
1,110,912
2,301,656
2,268,771
Costs and expenses
Cost of sales
357,455
358,856
744,923
732,470
Labor and other related
301,039
302,472
625,025
613,890
Other restaurant operating
254,281
265,279
518,319
521,797
Depreciation and amortization
47,375
48,627
93,861
94,792
General and administrative
75,962
72,262
149,209
146,316
Provision for impaired assets and restaurant closings
900
1,025
10,033
7,089
Total costs and expenses
1,037,012
1,048,521
2,141,370
2,116,354
Income from operations
62,585
62,391
160,286
152,417
Loss on extinguishment and modification of debt
(2,638
)
(11,092
)
(2,638
)
(11,092
)
Other income (expense), net
57
317
(1,090
)
153
Interest expense, net
(12,867
)
(15,109
)
(26,065
)
(31,707
)
Income before provision for income taxes
47,137
36,507
130,493
109,771
Provision for income taxes
14,081
8,785
35,355
26,949
Net income
33,056
27,722
95,138
82,822
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
830
1,331
2,324
2,698
Net income attributable to Bloomin’ Brands
$
32,226
$
26,391
$
92,814
$
80,124
Net income
$
33,056
$
27,722
$
95,138
$
82,822
Other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency translation adjustment
(26,182
)
19,088
(51,644
)
13,723
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives, net of tax
844
—
(3,168
)
—
Comprehensive income
7,718
46,810
40,326
96,545
Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
830
1,331
2,324
2,698
Comprehensive income attributable to Bloomin’ Brands
$
6,888
$
45,479
$
38,002
$
93,847
Earnings per share:
Basic
$
0.26
$
0.21
$
0.75
$
0.64
Diluted
$
0.26
$
0.21
$
0.73
$
0.63
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic
123,046
125,229
124,174
124,889
Diluted
126,242
128,378
127,501
128,115
Cash dividends declared per common share
$
0.06
$
—
$
0.12
$
—
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(IN THOUSANDS, UNAUDITED)
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
COMMON STOCK
ADDITIONAL
PAID-IN
CAPITAL
ACCUM- ULATED
DEFICIT
ACCUMULATED
OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE
LOSS
NON-
CONTROLLING
INTERESTS
TOTAL
SHARES
AMOUNT
Balance, December 28, 2014
125,950
$
1,259
$
1,085,627
$
(474,994
)
$
(60,542
)
$
5,099
$
556,449
Net income
—
—
—
92,814
—
2,128
94,942
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
—
—
—
—
(54,812
)
—
(54,812
)
Cash dividends declared, $0.12 per common share
—
—
(14,814
)
—
—
—
(14,814
)
Repurchase and retirement of common stock
(4,129
)
(41
)
—
(99,959
)
—
—
(100,000
)
Stock-based compensation
—
—
10,215
—
—
—
10,215
Excess tax benefit on stock-based compensation
—
—
1,272
—
—
—
1,272
Common stock issued under stock plans, net of forfeitures and shares withheld for employee taxes
804
8
6,004
(525
)
—
—
5,487
Purchase of noncontrolling interests
—
—
(229
)
—
—
—
(229
)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
—
—
—
—
—
(2,562
)
(2,562
)
Balance, June 28, 2015
122,625
$
1,226
$
1,088,075
$
(482,664
)
$
(115,354
)
$
4,665
$
495,948
(CONTINUED...)
6
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(IN THOUSANDS, UNAUDITED)
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
COMMON STOCK
ADDITIONAL
PAID-IN
CAPITAL
ACCUM- ULATED
DEFICIT
ACCUMULATED
OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE
LOSS
NON-
CONTROLLING
INTERESTS
TOTAL
SHARES
AMOUNT
Balance, December 31, 2013
124,784
$
1,248
$
1,068,705
$
(565,154
)
$
(26,418
)
$
4,328
$
482,709
Net income
—
—
—
80,124
—
2,258
82,382
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
—
—
—
—
13,723
—
13,723
Stock-based compensation
—
8,032
—
—
—
8,032
Excess tax benefit on stock-based compensation
—
—
1,095
—
—
—
1,095
Common stock issued under stock plans, net of forfeitures and shares withheld for employee taxes
813
8
5,485
(799
)
—
—
4,694
Purchase of limited partnership interests, net of tax of $6,519
—
—
(11,928
)
—
—
1,236
(10,692
)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
—
—
—
—
—
(2,470
)
(2,470
)
Balance, June 29, 2014
125,597
$
1,256
$
1,071,389
$
(485,829
)
$
(12,695
)
$
5,352
$
579,473
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS, UNAUDITED)
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Cash flows provided by operating activities:
Net income
$
95,138
$
82,822
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
93,861
94,792
Amortization of deferred financing fees
1,474
1,640
Amortization of capitalized gift card sales commissions
15,548
14,829
Provision for impaired assets and restaurant closings
10,033
7,089
Accretion on debt discounts
965
1,097
Stock-based and other non-cash compensation expense
11,810
9,672
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
1,931
(372
)
Loss on disposal of property, fixtures and equipment
498
1,077
Gain on life insurance and restricted cash investments
(1,582
)
(1,732
)
Loss on disposal of business or subsidiary
1,097
—
Loss on extinguishment and modification of debt
2,638
11,092
Recognition of deferred gain on sale-leaseback transaction
(1,064
)
(1,070
)
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
(1,272
)
(1,095
)
Change in assets and liabilities:
Decrease in inventories
6,352
15,724
Decrease (increase) in other current assets
66,321
(25,212
)
Decrease in other assets
7,291
5,320
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued and other current liabilities
(6,505
)
(11,440
)
Increase in deferred rent
13,063
8,482
Decrease in unearned revenue
(118,257
)
(110,392
)
Decrease in other long-term liabilities
(1,913
)
(5,077
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
197,427
97,246
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Purchases of life insurance policies
(3,392
)
(1,040
)
Proceeds received from life insurance policies
14,942
627
Proceeds from disposal of property, fixtures and equipment
3,104
562
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired
—
(3,063
)
Proceeds from sale of a business
7,798
—
Capital expenditures
(114,251
)
(97,619
)
Decrease in restricted cash
31,694
13,556
Increase in restricted cash
(29,216
)
(14,192
)
Net cash used in investing activities
$
(89,321
)
$
(101,169
)
(CONTINUED...)
8
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS, UNAUDITED)
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of senior secured Term loan A
$
—
$
297,088
Extinguishment and modification of senior secured term loan
(215,000
)
(700,000
)
Repayments of long-term debt
(29,419
)
(18,090
)
Proceeds from borrowings on revolving credit facilities
397,336
415,000
Repayments of borrowings on revolving credit facilities
(152,300
)
(15,000
)
Financing fees
(1,235
)
(4,492
)
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options, net of tax withholdings
6,012
6,112
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
(2,562
)
(2,470
)
Purchase of limited partnerships and noncontrolling interests
(652
)
(17,211
)
Repayments of partner deposits and accrued partner obligations
(27,231
)
(13,909
)
Repurchase of common stock
(100,525
)
(799
)
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
1,272
1,095
Cash dividends paid on common stock
(14,814
)
—
Net cash used in financing activities
(139,118
)
(52,676
)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
(1,960
)
2,571
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(32,972
)
(54,028
)
Cash and cash equivalents as of the beginning of the period
165,744
209,871
Cash and cash equivalents as of the end of the period
$
132,772
$
155,843
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest
$
25,730
$
30,790
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds
10,883
29,941
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Conversion of partner deposits and accrued partner obligations to notes payable
$
—
$
323
Change in acquisition of property, fixtures and equipment included in accounts payable or capital lease liabilities
(3,015
)
9,858
Deferred tax effect of purchase of noncontrolling interests
—
6,519
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
9
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1
.
Description of the Business and Basis of Presentation
Description of the Business -
Bloomin’ Brands, Inc. (“Bloomin’ Brands” or the “Company”) owns and operates casual, upscale casual and fine dining restaurants primarily in the United States. The Company’s restaurant portfolio has
four
concepts: Outback Steakhouse, Carrabba’s Italian Grill, Bonefish Grill and Fleming’s Prime Steakhouse & Wine Bar. Additional Outback Steakhouse, Carrabba’s Italian Grill and Bonefish Grill restaurants in which the Company has no direct investment are operated under franchise agreements. In January 2015, the Company sold its Roy’s business.
Basis of Presentation -
The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) for complete financial statements. In the opinion of the Company, all adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of the Company’s results of operations, financial position and cash flows for the periods presented have been included and are of a normal, recurring nature. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 28, 2014
.
Reclassifications -
The Company reclassified certain items in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for prior periods to be comparable with the classification for the current period. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported net income.
Recently Issued Financial Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
-
In April 2015, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”)
issued
Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)
No. 2015-03: “Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs” (“ASU No. 2015-03”). ASU No. 2015-03 will require debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability. The update requires retrospective application and represents a change in accounting principle. ASU No. 2015-03 will be effective for the Company in fiscal year 2016, with early adoption permitted.
The Company does not expect ASU No. 2015-03 to have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15: “Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern” (“ASU No. 2014-15”). ASU No. 2014-15 will explicitly require management to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and to provide related footnote disclosures in certain circumstances. The new standard is applicable for all entities and will be effective for the Company in fiscal year 2016. The Company does not expect ASU No. 2014-15 to have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09 “Revenue Recognition (Topic 606), Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU No. 2014-09”). ASU No. 2014-09 provides a single source of guidance for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes current revenue recognition standards. Under ASU No. 2014-09, revenue is recognized in an amount that reflects the consideration an entity expects to receive for the transfer of goods and services. On July 9, 2015, the FASB agreed to delay the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year. As a result, the new guidance will be effective for the Company in fiscal year 2018 and is applied retrospectively to each period presented or as a cumulative effect adjustment at the date of adoption. The Company has not selected a transition method and is evaluating the impact this guidance will have on its financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Recent accounting guidance not discussed above is not applicable, did not have, or is not expected to have a material impact to the Company.
10
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) - Continued
2
.
Disposals, Exit Costs and Acquisitions
The components of Provision for impaired assets and restaurant closings are as follows:
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
(dollars in thousands)
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Impairment losses
$
857
$
407
$
2,152
$
483
Restaurant closure expenses
43
618
7,881
6,606
Provision for impaired assets and restaurant closings
$
900
$
1,025
$
10,033
$
7,089
Restaurant Closure Initiatives -
During 2014, the Company decided to close
36
underperforming international locations, primarily in South Korea (the “International Restaurant Closure Initiative”). As of
June 28, 2015
,
35
of the
36
locations had been closed. In connection with the International Restaurant Closure Initiative, the Company incurred pre-tax restaurant and other closing costs of
($0.3) million
and
$6.1 million
during the thirteen and
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
, respectively, which were recorded within the International segment.
The Company expects to incur additional charges of approximately
$1.0 million
, including costs associated with lease obligations, employee terminations and other closure related obligations, through the third quarter of 2015. Future cash expenditures of
$5.0 million
to
$7.0 million
, primarily related to lease liabilities, are expected to occur through
August 2022
.
In the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company completed an assessment of its domestic restaurant base and decided to close
22
underperforming domestic locations (the “Domestic Restaurant Closure Initiative”). Pre-tax restaurant and other closing costs of
$1.3 million
and
$6.0 million
were incurred during the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
and
June 29, 2014
, respectively, in connection with the Domestic Restaurant Closure Initiative, which were recorded within the U.S. segment.
Following is a summary of restaurant closure initiative expenses recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (dollars in thousands):
DESCRIPTION
LOCATION OF CHARGE IN THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Facility closure and other expenses
Provision for impaired assets and restaurant closings
$
(309
)
$
—
$
7,432
$
5,972
Severance and other liabilities
General and administrative
246
—
1,573
1,035
Reversal of deferred rent liability
Other restaurant operating
—
—
(198
)
(2,078
)
$
(63
)
$
—
$
8,807
$
4,929
11
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) - Continued
The following table summarizes the Company’s accrual activity related to facility closure and other costs, primarily associated with the Domestic and International Restaurant Closure Initiatives, during the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
:
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
(dollars in thousands)
JUNE 28, 2015
Beginning of the period
$
11,000
Charges
8,634
Cash payments
(10,022
)
Adjustments (1)
(753
)
End of the period (2)
$
8,859
________________
(1)
Adjustments to facility closure and other costs represent changes in sublease assumptions and the impact of lease settlements on the Company’s remaining lease obligations.
(2)
As of
June 28, 2015
, the Company had exit-related accruals of
$2.5 million
recorded in Accrued and other current liabilities and
$6.4 million
recorded in Other long-term liabilities, net.
Roy’s
- On January 26, 2015, the Company sold its Roy’s business to United Ohana, LLC (the “Buyer”), for a purchase price of
$10.0 million
, less certain liabilities, and recorded a (gain) loss on sale of
($0.3) million
and
$0.8 million
, which was recorded in Other expense, net, during the thirteen and
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
, respectively. The sale agreement contains a provision obligating the Company to pay the Buyer up to
$5.0 million
, if certain lease contingencies are not resolved prior to April 2018 and the Buyer is damaged. In July 2015, these lease contingencies were satisfactorily resolved.
In connection with the sale of Roy’s, the Company continues to provide lease guarantees for certain of the Roy’s locations. Under the guarantees, the Company will pay the rental expense over the remaining lease term in the event of default by the Buyer. The fair value and maximum value of the lease guarantees is nominal. The maximum amount is calculated as the fair value of the lease payments over the remaining lease term and assumes that there are subleases.
Following are the components of Roy’s included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income during the periods indicated:
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
(dollars in thousands)
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Restaurant sales
$
—
$
17,472
$
5,729
$
36,401
Income (loss) before income taxes (1)
$
327
$
113
$
(641
)
$
568
________________
(1)
Includes (gain) loss on sale of
($0.3) million
and
$0.8 million
during the thirteen and
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
, respectively.
Other Disposals -
During the second quarter of 2015, the Company recognized additional pre-tax asset impairment charges of
$0.7 million
for corporate aircraft classified as held for sale. The impairment charges are recorded in Provision for impaired assets and restaurant closings in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
Acquisitions
- In 2013, the Company completed the acquisition of a controlling interest in PGS Consultoria e Serviços Ltda. (the “Brazil Joint Venture”) by purchasing
80%
of the issued and outstanding capital stock of PGS Participações Ltda (“PGS Par”). As a result of the acquisition, the Company had a
90%
interest and the former equity holders of PGS Par (“Former Equity Holders”) retained a noncontrolling interest of
10%
in the Brazil Joint Venture.
In April 2015, certain Former Equity Holders exercised options to sell their remaining interests in the Brazil Joint Venture to the Company for total cash consideration of
$0.7 million
This transaction resulted in a reduction of
$0.5
12
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) - Continued
million
and
$0.2 million
of Mezzanine equity and Additional paid-in capital, respectively, during the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
. As a result of the option exercise, the Company now owns
90.25%
of the Brazil Joint Venture.
In connection with the Company’s acquisition of the Brazil Joint Venture in 2013,
$7.9 million
of the Company’s cash was held in escrow for customary indemnification obligations. The Former Equity Holders had
an equal amount
of cash held in escrow. The Company’s portion of escrow cash is reflected as restricted cash in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. In June 2015, the Company and the Former Equity Holders agreed to
release all escrow cash
.
Certain Former Equity Holders contributed approximately
$3.2 million
to the Company for a noncontrolling interest in a new concept in Brazil (Abbraccio) in June 2015. As the Company consolidates the results of its Brazil operations on a one-month calendar lag, the release of cash and recognition of the noncontrolling interest will be reflected in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 27, 2015.
3. Earnings Per Share
The Company computes basic earnings per share based on the weighted average number of common shares that were outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share includes the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents consisting of stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance-based share units, using the treasury stock method. Performance-based share units are considered dilutive when the related performance criterion has been met.
The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
(in thousands, except per share data)
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Net income attributable to Bloomin’ Brands
$
32,226
$
26,391
$
92,814
$
80,124
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
123,046
125,229
124,174
124,889
Effect of diluted securities:
Stock options
3,025
3,051
3,123
3,121
Nonvested restricted stock and restricted stock units
171
98
201
105
Nonvested performance-based share units
—
—
3
—
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
126,242
128,378
127,501
128,115
Basic earnings per share
$
0.26
$
0.21
$
0.75
$
0.64
Diluted earnings per share
$
0.26
$
0.21
$
0.73
$
0.63
Dilutive securities outstanding not included in the computation of earnings per share because their effect was antidilutive were as follows:
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
(in thousands)
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Stock options
2,899
2,688
2,510
2,307
Nonvested restricted stock and restricted stock units
26
174
43
197
13
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) - Continued
4. Stock-based Compensation
The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense as follows:
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
(dollars in thousands)
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Stock options
$
2,552
$
3,098
$
4,979
$
5,566
Restricted stock and restricted stock units
1,741
989
3,150
1,738
Performance-based share units
940
177
1,689
535
$
5,233
$
4,264
$
9,818
$
7,839
During the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
, the Company made grants to its employees of
1.2 million
stock options,
0.4 million
time-based restricted stock units and
0.2 million
performance-based share units.
Assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the weighted-average fair value of option awards granted were as follows:
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
JUNE 28, 2015
Assumptions:
Weighted-average risk-free interest rate (1)
1.64
%
Dividend yield (2)
1.0
%
Expected term (3)
6.3 years
Weighted-average volatility (4)
43.4
%
Weighted-average grant date fair value per option
$
10.11
________________
(1)
Risk-free rate is the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect as of the grant date for periods within the contractual life of the option.
(2)
Dividend yield is the level of dividends expected be paid on the Company’s common stock over the expected term of the option.
(3)
Expected term represents the period of time that the options are expected to be outstanding. The simplified method of estimating the expected term is used since the Company does not have significant historical exercise experience for its stock options.
(4)
Volatility for the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
is based on the historical volatilities of the Company’s stock and the stock of comparable peer companies.
The following represents unrecognized stock compensation expense and the remaining weighted-average vesting period as of
June 28, 2015
:
UNRECOGNIZED
COMPENSATION EXPENSE
(dollars in thousands)
REMAINING WEIGHTED-AVERAGE VESTING PERIOD (in years)
Stock options
$
27,808
2.9
Restricted stock and restricted stock units
$
20,839
3.2
Performance-based share units
$
2,548
0.7
14
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) - Continued
5. Other Current Assets, Net
Other current assets, net, consisted of the following:
JUNE 28,
DECEMBER 28,
(dollars in thousands)
2015
2014
Prepaid expenses
$
26,856
$
30,260
Accounts receivable - vendors, net
23,593
27,340
Accounts receivable - franchisees, net
1,865
1,159
Accounts receivable - other, net
38,101
107,178
Other current assets, net
18,578
40,691
$
108,993
$
206,628
6. Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Net
(dollars in thousands)
U.S. SEGMENT
INTERNATIONAL SEGMENT
CONSOLIDATED
Balance as of December 28, 2014
$
172,711
$
168,829
$
341,540
Translation adjustments
—
(23,334
)
(23,334
)
Balance as of June 28, 2015
$
172,711
$
145,495
$
318,206
The Company performed an annual assessment of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets during the fiscal second quarters of 2015 and 2014. In connection with the annual assessment, no goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible asset impairments were recorded in the
thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
and
June 29, 2014
, respectively.
7
.
Accrued and Other Current Liabilities
Accrued and other current liabilities consisted of the following:
JUNE 28,
DECEMBER 28,
(in thousands)
2015
2014
Accrued payroll and other compensation
$
94,690
$
121,548
Accrued insurance
22,122
19,455
Other current liabilities
91,801
96,841
$
208,613
$
237,844
Accrued Payroll Taxes -
In May 2015, the IRS issued an audit adjustment of
$3.3 million
to the Company for the employer’s share of FICA taxes related to cash tips allegedly received and unreported by the Company’s employees during calendar year 2011. As of
June 28, 2015
and
December 28, 2014
, the Company had
$9.3 million
and
$12.0 million
, respectively, recorded in Accrued and other current liabilities in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet for payroll tax audits related to tax years 2011 and 2012.
15
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) - Continued
8
.
Long-term Debt, Net
Following is a summary of outstanding long-term debt:
JUNE 28, 2015
DECEMBER 28, 2014
(dollars in thousands)
OUTSTANDING BALANCE
INTEREST RATE
OUTSTANDING BALANCE
INTEREST RATE
Senior Secured Credit Facility:
Term loan A (1)
$
285,000
2.17
%
$
296,250
2.16
%
Term loan B
—
—
%
225,000
3.50
%
Revolving credit facility (1)
570,000
2.16
%
325,000
2.16
%
Total Senior Secured Credit Facility
855,000
846,250
2012 CMBS loan:
First mortgage loan (1)
293,921
4.11
%
299,765
4.08
%
First mezzanine loan
84,579
9.00
%
85,127
9.00
%
Second mezzanine loan
85,707
11.25
%
86,067
11.25
%
Total 2012 CMBS Loan
464,207
470,959
Capital lease obligations
2,716
634
Other long-term debt (2)
2,868
0.73% to 7.60%
4,073
0.52% to 7.00%
$
1,324,791
$
1,321,916
Less: current portion of long-term debt, net
(25,602
)
(25,964
)
Less: unamortized debt discount
(3,874
)
(6,073
)
Long-term debt, net
$
1,295,315
$
1,289,879
________________
(1)
Represents the weighted-average interest rate for the respective period.
(2)
Balance is comprised of sale-leaseback obligations and uncollateralized notes payable. Interest rates presented relate to the notes payable.
Credit Agreement Amendment -
On March 31, 2015, OSI Restaurant Partners, LLC (“OSI”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) to its existing credit agreement, dated October 26, 2012 (as previously amended, the “Existing Credit Agreement”), to effect an increase of OSI’s existing revolving credit facility from
$600.0 million
to
$825.0 million
in order to fully pay down its existing Term Loan B on April 2, 2015. No other material changes were made to the terms of OSI’s Existing Credit Agreement as a result of the Amendment.
Revolving Credit Facility -
Fees on letters of credit and the daily unused availability under the revolving credit facility as of
June 28, 2015
were
2.13%
and
0.30%
, respectively. As of
June 28, 2015
,
$29.6 million
of the revolving credit facility was committed for the issuance of letters of credit and not available for borrowing.
Debt Covenants -
As of
June 28, 2015
and
December 28, 2014
, the Company was in compliance with its debt covenants.
16
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) - Continued
Loss on Modification and Extinguishment of Debt -
Following is a summary of loss on extinguishment and modification of debt recorded in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income:
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
(dollars in thousands)
JUNE 28, 2015 (1)
JUNE 29, 2014 (2)
JUNE 28, 2015 (1)
JUNE 29, 2014 (2)
Refinancing of Senior Secured Credit Facility
$
2,638
$
11,092
$
2,638
$
11,092
________________
(1)
The loss was comprised of the write-off of
$1.4 million
of deferred financing fees and the write-off of
$1.2 million
of unamortized debt discount.
(2)
The loss was comprised of the write-off of
$5.5 million
of deferred financing fees, the write-off of
$4.9 million
of unamortized debt discount and a prepayment penalty of
$0.7 million
.
Deferred financing fees -
During the second quarter of 2015, the Company deferred
$1.2 million
of financing costs incurred in connection with the amendment to the Credit Agreement. The deferred financing costs are included in Other assets, net in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
9. Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
(dollars in thousands)
JUNE 28, 2015
Balance, beginning of period
$
24,733
Net income attributable to Redeemable noncontrolling interests
196
Purchase of Redeemable noncontrolling interests (1)
(459
)
Balance, end of period
$
24,470
________________
(1)
In April 2015, certain equity holders of PGS Par exercised options to sell their remaining interests in the Brazil Joint Venture. See Note
2
-
Disposals, Exit Costs and Acquisitions
for further information.
As of
June 28, 2015
, the Company allocated Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and performed a measurement of the redemption amount for Redeemable noncontrolling interests, including a fair value assessment. Based on the fair value assessment,
no
adjustment was required for the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
.
10.
Stockholders’ Equity
Secondary Public Offering -
In March 2015, Bain Capital sold its remaining shares of the Company’s common stock through an underwritten secondary public offering. The selling stockholders received all of the proceeds from the offering. Pursuant to the underwriting agreement for the secondary public offering, the Company repurchased from the underwriters
2,759,164
of the shares sold by Bain Capital at a cost of
$70.0 million
.
Share Repurchases
- In December 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) approved a share repurchase program (the “2014 Share Repurchase Program”) under which the Company was authorized to repurchase up to
$100.0 million
of its outstanding common stock. As of
June 28, 2015
,
no
shares remained available for purchase under the 2014 Share Repurchase Program.
17
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) - Continued
Following is a summary of the shares repurchased under the Company’s share repurchase program:
NUMBER OF SHARES
(in thousands)
AVERAGE REPURCHASE PER SHARE
AMOUNT
(in thousands)
Thirteen weeks ended March 29, 2015 (1)
2,759
$
25.37
$
70,000
Thirteen weeks ended June 28, 2015
1,370
$
21.90
30,000
Total common stock repurchases
4,129
$
24.22
$
100,000
________________
(1)
Includes the repurchase of
$70.0 million
of the Company’s common stock in connection with the secondary public offering by Bain Capital in March 2015.
In August 2015, the Board approved a new share repurchase program (the “2015 Share Repurchase Program”) under which the Company is authorized to repurchase up to
$100.0 million
of its outstanding common stock. The authorization for the 2015 Share Repurchase Program will expire on
February 3, 2017
. As of the date of this filing,
no
shares had been repurchased under the 2015 Share Repurchase Program.
Shares repurchased are retired. The par value of the repurchased shares is deducted from common stock and the excess of the purchase price over the par value of the shares is recorded to Accumulated deficit.
Dividends -
The Company declared and paid dividends per share during the periods presented as follows:
DIVIDENDS
PER SHARE
AMOUNT
(in thousands)
Thirteen weeks ended March 29, 2015
$
0.06
$
7,423
Thirteen weeks ended June 28, 2015
0.06
7,391
Total cash dividends declared and paid
$
0.12
$
14,814
In July 2015, the Board declared a quarterly cash dividend of
$0.06
per share, payable on
August 28, 2015
, to shareholders of record at the close of business on
August 18, 2015
.
Accumulated other comprehensive loss -
Following are the components of Accumulated other comprehensive loss (“AOCL”), net of tax:
(dollars in thousands)
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION ADJUSTMENT
UNREALIZED LOSSES ON DERIVATIVES
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Balances as of December 28, 2014
$
(58,149
)
$
(2,393
)
$
(60,542
)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
(51,644
)
(3,168
)
(54,812
)
Balances as of June 28, 2015
$
(109,793
)
$
(5,561
)
$
(115,354
)
11
.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company is exposed to certain risk arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. The Company manages economic risks, including interest rate risk, primarily by managing the amount, sources and duration of its debt funding and through the use of derivative financial instruments. The Company’s objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish these objectives, the Company primarily uses interest rate swaps.
18
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) - Continued
DESIGNATED HEDGES
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk -
On
September 9, 2014
, the Company entered into variable-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements with
eight
counterparties to hedge a portion of the cash flows of the Company’s variable rate debt. The swap agreements have an aggregate notional amount of
$400.0 million
, a forward start date of
June 30, 2015
, and mature on
May 16, 2019
. Under the terms of the swap agreements, the Company will pay a weighted-average fixed rate of
2.02%
on the
$400.0 million
notional amount and receive payments from the counterparty based on the
30-day LIBOR
rate.
The interest rate swaps, which have been designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge, are recognized on the Company
’
s Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value and are classified based on the instruments’
maturity dates. Fair value changes in the interest rate swaps are recognized in AOCL for all effective portions. Balances in AOCL are subsequently reclassified to earnings in the same period that the hedged interest payments affect earnings. The Company estimates
$6.4 million
will be reclassified to interest expense over the next twelve months.
The following table presents the fair value and classification of the Company’s interest rate swaps:
(dollars in thousands)
JUNE 28, 2015
DECEMBER 28, 2014
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET CLASSIFICATION
Interest rate swaps - liability
$
6,052
$
2,617
Accrued and other current liabilities
Interest rate swaps - liability
3,065
1,307
Other long-term liabilities, net
Total fair value of derivative instruments (1)
$
9,117
$
3,924
____________________
(1)
See Note
12
-
Fair Value Measurements
for fair value discussion of the interest rate swaps.
As of
June 28, 2015
,
no
interest expense related to the interest rate swaps is accrued in the Consolidated Balance Sheets or recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income as the interest rate swaps did not commence until
June 30, 2015
. During the
thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
, the Company did not recognize
any
gain or loss as a result of hedge ineffectiveness.
The following table summarizes the effects of the interest rate swap on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the
thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
:
AMOUNT OF GAIN (LOSS) RECOGNIZED IN OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
(dollars in thousands)
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 28, 2015
Interest rate swaps
$
1,385
$
(5,193
)
Income tax (expense) benefit
(541
)
2,025
Net of income taxes
$
844
$
(3,168
)
The Company records its derivatives on the Consolidated Balance Sheets on a gross balance basis. The Company’s derivatives are subject to master netting arrangements. As of
June 28, 2015
, the Company did not have more than
one
derivative between the same counterparties and as such, there was no netting.
By utilizing the interest rate swaps, the Company is exposed to credit-related losses in the event that the counterparty fails to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. To mitigate this risk, the Company enters into derivative contracts with major financial institutions based upon credit ratings and other factors. The Company continually assesses the creditworthiness of its counterparties. As of
June 28, 2015
, all counterparties to the interest rate swaps had performed in accordance with their contractual obligations.
As of
June 28, 2015
, the fair value of the Company’s derivatives in a net liability position, excluding any adjustment for nonperformance risk, was
$9.3 million
. As of
June 28, 2015
, the Company has not posted any collateral related to
19
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) - Continued
these agreements. If the Company had breached any of these provisions as of
June 28, 2015
, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at their termination value of
$9.3 million
.
12
.
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability, or the exit price, in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Fair value is categorized into one of following three levels based on the lowest level of significant input:
Level 1
Unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2
Observable inputs available at measurement date other than quoted prices included in Level 1
Level 3
Unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated by observable market data
Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis -
The following table summarizes the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value by hierarchy level on a recurring basis as of
June 28, 2015
and
December 28, 2014
:
JUNE 28, 2015
DECEMBER 28, 2014
(dollars in thousands)
TOTAL
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
TOTAL
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
Assets:
Cash equivalents:
Fixed income funds
$
61
$
61
$
—
$
4,602
$
4,602
$
—
Money market funds
1,133
1,133
—
7,842
7,842
—
Restricted cash equivalents:
Money market funds
571
571
—
3,360
3,360
—
Total asset recurring fair value measurements
$
1,765
$
1,765
$
—
$
15,804
$
15,804
$
—
Liabilities:
Accrued and other current liabilities:
Derivative instruments - interest rate swaps
$
6,052
$
—
$
6,052
$
2,617
$
—
$
2,617
Derivative instruments - commodities
507
—
507
566
—
566
Other long-term liabilities:
Derivative instruments - interest rate swaps
3,065
—
3,065
1,307
—
1,307
Total liability recurring fair value measurements
$
9,624
$
—
$
9,624
$
4,490
$
—
$
4,490
Fair value of each class of financial instrument is determined based on the following:
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT
METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS
Fixed income funds and
Money market funds
Carrying value approximates fair value because maturities are less than three months.
Derivative instruments
Derivative instruments primarily relate to the interest rate swaps. Fair value measurements are based on a discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and credit spreads. The Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. As of June 28, 2015, the Company has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives.
20
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) - Continued
Fair Value Measurements on a Nonrecurring Basis -
Assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis relate primarily to property, fixtures and equipment, goodwill and other intangible assets, which are remeasured when carrying value exceeds fair value. The following table summarizes the Company’s assets measured at fair value by hierarchy level on a nonrecurring basis for the
thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
:
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 28, 2015
(dollars in thousands)
CARRYING VALUE (1)
TOTAL
IMPAIRMENT
CARRYING VALUE (1)
TOTAL
IMPAIRMENT
Assets held for sale
$
3,353
$
857
$
3,353
$
1,028
Property, fixtures and equipment
—
—
950
1,124
$
3,353
$
857
$
4,303
$
2,152
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
JUNE 29, 2014
JUNE 29, 2014
(dollars in thousands)
CARRYING VALUE (2)
TOTAL
IMPAIRMENT
CARRYING VALUE (2)
TOTAL
IMPAIRMENT
Property, fixtures and equipment
$
2,351
$
407
$
2,951
$
483
$
2,351
$
407
$
2,951
$
483
________________
(1)
Carrying value approximates fair value with all assets measured using Level 2 inputs for the
thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
. A third-party market appraisal (Level 2) and a purchase contract (Level 2) were used to estimate the fair value.
(2)
Carrying value approximates fair value with
$1.7 million
and
$0.6 million
measured using Level 2 and Level 3 inputs, respectively, for the
thirteen weeks ended June 29, 2014
and
$2.3 million
and
$0.6 million
measured using Level 2 and Level 3 inputs, respectively, for the
twenty-six weeks ended June 29, 2014
.
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments -
The Company’s non-derivative financial instruments as of
June 28, 2015
and
December 28, 2014
consist of cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and current and long-term debt. The fair values of cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their carrying amounts reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets due to their short duration.
Debt is carried at amortized cost; however, the Company estimates the fair value of debt for disclosure purposes. The following table includes the carrying value and fair value of the Company’s debt by hierarchy level as of
June 28, 2015
and
December 28, 2014
:
JUNE 28, 2015
DECEMBER 28, 2014
FAIR VALUE
FAIR VALUE
(dollars in thousands)
CARRYING VALUE
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
CARRYING VALUE
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
Senior Secured Credit Facility:
Term loan A
$
285,000
$
283,931
$
—
$
296,250
$
294,769
$
—
Term loan B
—
—
—
225,000
222,188
—
Revolving credit facility
570,000
565,725
—
325,000
322,563
—
CMBS loan:
Mortgage loan
293,921
—
300,477
299,765
—
308,563
First mezzanine loan
84,579
—
84,639
85,127
—
85,187
Second mezzanine loan
85,707
—
86,624
86,067
—
86,988
Other notes payable
1,506
—
1,468
2,722
—
2,625
21
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) - Continued
Fair value of debt is determined based on the following:
DEBT FACILITY
METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS
Senior Secured Credit Facility
Quoted market prices in inactive markets.
CMBS loan
Assumptions derived from current conditions in the real estate and credit markets, changes in the underlying collateral and expectations of management.
Other notes payable
Discounted cash flow approach. Discounted cash flow inputs primarily include cost of debt rates which are used to derive the present value factors for the determination of fair value.
13. Income Taxes
The effective income tax rates for the
thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
were
29.9%
and
27.1%
, respectively, compared to
24.1%
and
24.6%
for the
thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 29, 2014
, respectively. The net increase in the effective income tax rate for the
thirteen weeks ended June 28, 2015
was due to: (i) the favorable resolution of a payroll tax audit contingency that resulted in a deferred tax adjustment and (ii) a change in the blend of taxable income across the Company’s U.S. and international subsidiaries. The net increase in the effective income tax rate for the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
was due to: (i) a change in the blend of taxable income across the Company’s U.S. and international subsidiaries and (ii) the favorable resolution of a payroll tax audit contingency that resulted in a deferred tax adjustment.
See Note
7
-
Accrued and Other Current Liabilities
for additional details regarding the payroll tax audit contingency.
14
.
Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation and Other Matters -
The matter set forth below is subject to uncertainties and outcomes that are not predictable with certainty. The Company is unable to estimate a range of reasonably possible loss for the matter described below as the proceedings are at stages where significant uncertainty exists as to the legal or factual issues. The Company provides disclosure of matters when management believes it is reasonably possible the impact may be material to the consolidated financial statements.
On October 4, 2013,
two
then-current employees (the “Nevada Plaintiffs”) filed a purported collective action lawsuit against the Company, OSI Restaurant Partners, LLC (“OSI”), and
two
of its subsidiaries in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada (Cardoza, et al. v. Bloomin’ Brands, Inc., et al., Case No.: 2:13-cv-01820-JAD-NJK). The complaint alleges violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act by requiring employees to work off the clock, complete on-line training without pay, and attend meetings in the restaurant without pay. The suit seeks to certify a nationwide collective action that all hourly employees in all Outback Steakhouse restaurants would be permitted to join. The suit seeks an unspecified amount in back pay for the employees that join the lawsuit, an equal amount in liquidated damages, costs, expenses, and attorney’s fees. The Nevada Plaintiffs also filed a companion lawsuit in Nevada state court alleging that the Company violated the state break time rules. On October 27, 2014 the Court conditionally certified a class for notice purposes consisting of all employees that worked at a company-owned Outback Steakhouse between October 27, 2011 and October 27, 2014. The Company subsequently filed a Motion to Reconsider the October 27, 2014 order. On February 5, 2015, the Court denied the Company’s Motion to reconsider the October 27, 2014 order granting conditional certification. The Company believes these lawsuits are without merit, and is vigorously defending all allegations.
In addition, the Company is subject to legal proceedings, claims and liabilities, such as liquor liability, sexual harassment and slip and fall cases, which arise in the ordinary course of business and are generally covered by insurance if they exceed specified retention or deductible amounts. In the opinion of management, the amount of ultimate liability with respect to those actions will not have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations and cash flows.
22
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) - Continued
15. Segment Reporting
During the first quarter of 2015, the Company recast its segment reporting to include
two
reportable segments, U.S. and International, which reflects changes made in how the Company manages its business, reviews operating performance and allocates resources. The U.S. segment includes all brands operating in the U.S. while brands operating outside the U.S. are included in the International segment. All prior period information was recast to reflect this change.
The Company’s reporting segments are organized based on restaurant concept and geographic location. Resources are allocated and performance is assessed by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), whom the Company has determined to be its Chief Operating Decision Maker. Following is a summary of reporting segments:
SEGMENT
CONCEPT
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
U.S.
Outback Steakhouse
United States of America, including Puerto Rico
Carrabba’s Italian Grill
Bonefish Grill
Fleming’s Prime Steakhouse & Wine Bar
International
Outback Steakhouse (1)
South Korea, Brazil, Hong Kong, China
Carrabba’s Italian Grill (Abbraccio)
Brazil
________________
(1)
Includes international franchise locations in
18
countries and Guam.
Segment accounting policies are the same as those described in Note 2 -
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 28, 2014
. Revenues for all segments include only transactions with customers and include
no
intersegment revenues. Excluded from net income from operations for U.S. and International are legal and certain corporate costs not directly related to the performance of the segments, interest and other expenses related to the Company’s credit agreements and derivative instruments, certain stock-based compensation expenses, certain bonus expense and certain insurance expenses managed centrally.
The following table is a summary of Total revenue by segment:
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
(dollars in thousands)
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Total revenues
U.S.
$
982,978
$
967,043
$
2,044,992
$
1,977,669
International
116,619
143,869
256,664
291,102
Total revenues
$
1,099,597
$
1,110,912
$
2,301,656
$
2,268,771
23
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) - Continued
The following table is a reconciliation of Segment income from operations to Income before provision for income taxes:
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
(dollars in thousands)
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Segment income from operations
U.S.
$
93,265
$
81,268
$
220,673
$
188,169
International
5,727
8,282
14,606
24,507
Total segment income from operations
98,992
89,550
235,279
212,676
Unallocated corporate operating expense
(36,407
)
(27,159
)
(74,993
)
(60,259
)
Total income from operations
62,585
62,391
160,286
152,417
Loss on extinguishment and modification of debt
(2,638
)
(11,092
)
(2,638
)
(11,092
)
Other income (expense), net
57
317
(1,090
)
153
Interest expense, net
(12,867
)
(15,109
)
(26,065
)
(31,707
)
Income before provision for income taxes
$
47,137
$
36,507
$
130,493
$
109,771
The following table is a summary of Depreciation and amortization expense by segment:
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
(dollars in thousands)
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Depreciation and amortization
U.S.
$
37,670
$
37,236
$
74,385
$
73,009
International
6,690
7,430
13,526
14,273
Corporate
3,015
3,961
5,950
7,510
Total depreciation and amortization
$
47,375
$
48,627
$
93,861
$
94,792
24
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and the related notes. Unless the context otherwise indicates, as used in this report, the term the “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” and other similar terms mean Bloomin’ Brands, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Cautionary Statement
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) includes statements that express our opinions, expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions or projections regarding future events or future results and therefore are, or may be deemed to be, “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements can generally be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, including the terms “believes,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “feels,” “seeks,” “forecasts,” “projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could” or “would” or, in each case, their negative or other variations or comparable terminology, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. These forward-looking statements include all matters that are not historical facts. They appear in a number of places throughout this Report and include statements regarding our intentions, beliefs or current expectations concerning, among other things, our results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, prospects, growth, strategies and the industry in which we operate.
By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that may or may not occur in the future. Although we base these forward-looking statements on assumptions that we believe are reasonable when made, we caution you that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and that our actual results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, and industry developments may differ materially from statements made in or suggested by the forward-looking statements contained in this Report. In addition, even if our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, and industry developments are consistent with the forward-looking statements contained in this Report, those results or developments may not be indicative of results or developments in subsequent periods. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from statements made or suggested by forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:
(i)
Economic conditions and their effects on consumer confidence and discretionary spending, consumer traffic, the cost and availability of credit and interest rates;
(ii)
Our ability to compete in the highly competitive restaurant industry with many well-established competitors and new market entrants;
(iii)
Our ability to preserve and grow the reputation and value of our brands;
(iv)
Our ability to acquire attractive sites on acceptable terms, obtain required permits and approvals, recruit and train necessary personnel and obtain adequate financing in order to develop new restaurants as planned, and difficulties in estimating the performance of newly opened restaurants;
(v)
The effects of international economic, political, social and legal conditions on our foreign operations and on foreign currency exchange rates;
(vi)
Our ability to effectively respond to changes in patterns of consumer traffic, consumer tastes and dietary habits;
25
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
(vii)
Seasonal and periodic fluctuations in our results and the effects of significant adverse weather conditions and other disasters or unforeseen events;
(viii)
Our ability to comply with governmental laws and regulations, the costs of compliance with such laws and regulations and the effects of changes to applicable laws and regulations;
(ix)
Minimum wage increases and additional mandated employee benefits;
(x)
Fluctuations in the price and availability of commodities;
(xi)
Consumer reactions to public health and food safety issues;
(xii)
Our ability to protect our information technology systems from interruption or security breach and to protect consumer data and personal employee information;
(xiii)
The effects of our substantial leverage and restrictive covenants in our various credit facilities on our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations, to make capital expenditures to invest in new or renovate restaurants and to react to changes in the economy or our industry, and our exposure to interest rate risk in connection with our variable-rate debt;
(xiv) The adequacy of our cash flow and earnings and other conditions which may affect our ability to pay dividends and repurchase shares of our common stock;
(xv) Strategic actions, including acquisitions and dispositions and our success in integrating any acquired or newly created businesses; and
(xvi) Such other factors as discussed throughout the “Risk Factors” section of this Report and in Part I, Item IA. Risk Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2014.
In light of these risks and uncertainties, we caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statement that we make in this Report speaks only as of the date of such statement, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement or to publicly announce the results of any revision to any of those statements to reflect future events or developments. Comparisons of results for current and any prior periods are not intended to express any future trends or indications of future performance, unless specifically expressed as such, and should only be viewed as historical data.
26
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
Overview
We are one of the largest casual dining restaurant companies in the world with a portfolio of leading, differentiated restaurant concepts. As of
June 28, 2015
, we owned and operated
1,323
restaurants and franchised
169
restaurants across
48
states, Puerto Rico, Guam and
22
countries. We have four founder-inspired concepts: Outback Steakhouse, Carrabba’s Italian Grill, Bonefish Grill and Fleming’s Prime Steakhouse & Wine Bar.
The casual dining restaurant industry is a highly competitive and fragmented industry and is sensitive to changes in the economy, trends in lifestyles, seasonality and fluctuating costs. Operating margins for restaurants can vary due to competitive pricing strategies, labor costs and fluctuations in prices of commodities and other necessities to operate a restaurant, such as natural gas or other energy supplies. Restaurant companies tend to be focused on increasing market share, comparable restaurant sales growth and new unit growth. Our industry is characterized by high initial capital investment, coupled with high labor costs. As a result, we focus on driving increased sales at existing restaurants in order to raise margins and profits, because the incremental contribution to profits from every additional dollar of sales above the minimum costs required to open, staff and operate a restaurant is relatively high. Historically, we have focused on restaurant growth with strong unit level economics.
Executive Summary
Our financial results for the
thirteen weeks ended June 28, 2015
(“second quarter 2015”) include the following:
•
U.S. comparable restaurant sales were
2.0%
higher, primarily due to growth at Outback and Flemings, partially offset by a decline at Bonefish Grill.
•
A decrease in total revenues of
1.0%
to
$1.1 billion
in the second quarter of 2015, as compared to the second quarter of 2014, primarily due to: (i) the effect of foreign currency translation, primarily due to the depreciation of the Brazilian Real, (ii) the closing of
55
restaurants since March 30, 2014, (iii) the sale of 20 Roy’s restaurants and (iv) lower comparable restaurant sales at Bonefish Grill and Outback Steakhouse in South Korea. The decrease in revenues was partially offset by: (i) the opening of
89
new restaurants not included in our comparable restaurant sales base and (ii) an increase in comparable restaurant sales at our existing restaurants, primarily at Outback Steakhouse in the U.S. and Brazil.
•
Income from operations of
$62.6 million
in the second quarter of 2015 as compared to
$62.4 million
in the second quarter of 2014, which was primarily due to an increase in operating margin at the restaurant-level, partially offset by higher general and administrative expense. Operating margin at the restaurant-level increased primarily due to productivity savings, higher U.S. average unit volumes and the favorable resolution of a payroll tax audit contingency. These increases were offset by commodity and wage rate inflation.
Following is a summary of significant actions we have taken and other factors that impacted our operating results and liquidity to date in 2015:
Dividend and Share Repurchase Programs -
In December 2014, the Board adopted a dividend policy under which it intends to declare quarterly cash dividends on shares of our common stock.
See Liquidity - Dividends and Share Repurchases.
The Board approved the 2014 Share Repurchase Program in December 2014 that authorized the repurchase of up to
$100.0 million
of our outstanding common stock. In May 2015, we completed the repurchase of all shares authorized under the 2014 Share Repurchase Program, which included the repurchase of
$70.0 million
of our common stock in connection with the secondary public offering by Bain Capital in March 2015.
27
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
In August 2015, the Board approved the 2015 Share Repurchase Program under which we are authorized to repurchase up to
$100.0 million
of our outstanding common stock. The authorization for the 2015 Share Repurchase Program will expire on
February 3, 2017
. As of the date of this filing,
no
shares had been repurchased under the 2015 Share Repurchase Program.
Credit Agreement Amendment -
On March 31, 2015, OSI, our wholly-owned subsidiary entered into the Amendment to OSI’s Existing Credit Agreement, to effect an increase of OSI’s existing revolving credit facility from
$600.0 million
to
$825.0 million
in order to fully pay down its existing Term Loan B on April 2, 2015. No other material changes were made to the terms of OSI’s Existing Credit Agreement as a result of the Amendment. In connection with the Amendment, we recognized a loss on modification and extinguishment of debt of
$2.6 million
.
Roy’s
- In January 2015, we sold our Roy’s concept.
Key Performance Indicators
Key measures that we use in evaluating our restaurants and assessing our business include the following:
•
Average restaurant unit volumes
—average sales per restaurant to measure changes in customer traffic, pricing and development of the brand;
•
Comparable restaurant sales
—year-over-year comparison of sales volumes for Company-owned restaurants that are open 18 months or more in order to remove the impact of new restaurant openings in comparing the operations of existing restaurants;
•
System-wide sales
—total restaurant sales volume for all Company-owned and franchise restaurants, regardless of ownership, to interpret the overall health of our brands;
•
Adjusted restaurant-level operating margin, Adjusted income from operations, Adjusted net income and Adjusted diluted earnings per share
—non-GAAP financial measures utilized to evaluate our operating performance, and for which definitions, usefulness and reconciliations are described in more detail in the “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section below; and
•
Customer satisfaction scores
—measurement of our customers’ experiences in a variety of key attributes.
28
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
Selected Operating Data
The table below presents the number of our restaurants in operation at the end of the periods indicated:
JUNE 28,
JUNE 29,
2015
2014
Number of restaurants (at end of the period):
U.S.
Outback Steakhouse
Company-owned
649
650
Franchised
105
104
Total
754
754
Carrabba’s Italian Grill
Company-owned
244
240
Franchised
2
1
Total
246
241
Bonefish Grill
Company-owned
207
193
Franchised
5
5
Total
212
198
Fleming’s Prime Steakhouse & Wine Bar
Company-owned
66
66
Roy’s (1)
Company-owned
—
20
International
Company-owned
Outback Steakhouse - South Korea
76
106
Outback Steakhouse - Brazil (2)
69
54
Other
12
12
Franchised
57
51
Total
214
223
System-wide total
1,492
1,502
____________________
(1)
On January 26, 2015, we sold our Roy’s concept.
(2)
The restaurant counts for Brazil are reported as of May 2015 and 2014, respectively, to correspond with the balance sheet dates of this subsidiary.
29
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentages of certain items in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income in relation to Total revenues or Restaurant sales, as indicated:
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Revenues
Restaurant sales
99.4
%
99.4
%
99.4
%
99.4
%
Other revenues
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
Total revenues
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Costs and expenses
Cost of sales (1)
32.7
32.5
32.6
32.5
Labor and other related (1)
27.5
27.4
27.3
27.2
Other restaurant operating (1)
23.3
24.0
22.7
23.1
Depreciation and amortization
4.3
4.4
4.1
4.2
General and administrative
6.9
6.5
6.5
6.4
Provision for impaired assets and restaurant closings
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.3
Total costs and expenses
94.3
94.4
93.0
93.3
Income from operations
5.7
5.6
7.0
6.7
Loss on extinguishment and modification of debt
(0.2
)
(1.0
)
(0.1
)
(0.5
)
Other income (expense), net
*
*
(*)
*
Interest expense, net
(1.2
)
(1.3
)
(1.2
)
(1.4
)
Income before provision for income taxes
4.3
3.3
5.7
4.8
Provision for income taxes
1.3
0.8
1.6
1.1
Net income
3.0
2.5
4.1
3.7
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
Net income attributable to Bloomin’ Brands
2.9
%
2.4
%
4.0
%
3.5
%
________________
(1)
As a percentage of Restaurant sales.
*
Less than 1/10
th
of one percent of Total revenues.
30
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
RESTAURANT SALES
Following is a summary of the change in restaurant sales for the
thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
as compared to last year:
(dollars in millions)
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
For the period ended June 29, 2014
$
1,104.4
$
2,255.0
Change from:
Restaurant openings (1)
40.6
78.2
Comparable restaurant sales (1)
17.4
55.6
Change in fiscal year
—
24.3
Restaurant closings
(23.8
)
(53.7
)
Effect of foreign currency translation
(28.3
)
(40.7
)
Divestiture of Roy’s
(17.5
)
(31.1
)
For the period ended June 28, 2015
$
1,092.8
$
2,287.6
____________________
(1)
Summation of quarterly changes for restaurant openings and comparable restaurant sales will not total to annual amounts as the restaurants that meet the definition of a comparable restaurant will differ each period based on when the restaurant opened.
The decrease in Restaurant sales in the
thirteen weeks ended June 28, 2015
was primarily attributable to: (i) the effect of foreign currency translation, primarily due to the depreciation of the Brazilian Real, (ii) the closing of
55
restaurants since March 30, 2014, (iii) the sale of 20 Roy’s restaurants and (iv) lower comparable restaurant sales at Bonefish Grill and Outback Steakhouse in South Korea. The decrease in restaurant sales was partially offset by: (i) the opening of
89
new restaurants not included in our comparable restaurant sales base and (ii) an increase in comparable restaurant sales at our existing restaurants, primarily at Outback Steakhouse in the U.S. and Brazil.
The increase in Restaurant sales in the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
was primarily attributable to: (i) the opening of
100
new restaurants not included in our comparable restaurant sales base, (ii) an increase in comparable restaurant sales at our existing restaurants, primarily at Outback Steakhouse in the U.S. and Brazil and (iii) two additional operating days during the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
due to a change in our fiscal year-end in 2014. The increase in restaurant sales was partially offset by: (i) the closing of
76
restaurants since
December 31, 2013
, (ii) the effect of foreign currency translation, primarily due to the depreciation of the Brazilian Real, (iii) the sale of 20 Roy’s restaurants and (iv) lower comparable restaurant sales at Bonefish Grill and Outback Steakhouse in South Korea.
31
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
Comparable Restaurant Sales and Menu Price Increases
Following is a summary of comparable restaurant sales and general menu price increases:
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Comparable restaurant sales (stores open 18 months or more) (1) (2):
U.S.
Outback Steakhouse
4.0
%
0.9
%
4.5
%
0.8
%
Carrabba’s Italian Grill
0.9
%
(1.2
)%
1.4
%
(1.5
)%
Bonefish Grill
(4.6
)%
0.3
%
(1.7
)%
(0.6
)%
Fleming’s Prime Steakhouse & Wine Bar
3.2
%
3.6
%
3.1
%
2.6
%
Combined U.S.
2.0
%
0.6
%
2.9
%
0.3
%
International
Outback Steakhouse - Brazil
3.4
%
12.2
%
4.8
%
9.4
%
Outback Steakhouse - South Korea
(11.8
)%
(14.3
)%
(7.0
)%
(16.8
)%
Year over year percentage change:
Menu price increases (3):
U.S.
Outback Steakhouse
3.8
%
2.1
%
3.7
%
2.3
%
Carrabba’s Italian Grill
2.1
%
2.6
%
2.2
%
2.7
%
Bonefish Grill
3.0
%
2.8
%
2.6
%
2.7
%
Fleming’s Prime Steakhouse & Wine Bar
2.6
%
3.4
%
2.5
%
3.6
%
International
Outback Steakhouse - Brazil
5.0
%
7.8
%
5.5
%
7.2
%
Outback Steakhouse - South Korea
1.7
%
0.9
%
1.9
%
0.4
%
____________________
(1)
Comparable restaurant sales exclude the effect of fluctuations in foreign currency rates. Relocated international restaurants closed more than 30 days and relocated U.S. restaurants closed more than 60 days are excluded from comparable restaurant sales until at least 18 months after reopening.
(2)
Due to our conversion to a 52-53 week fiscal year in 2014, there were two more days in the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
as compared to the
twenty-six weeks ended June 29, 2014
. These additional days increased total revenues by
$24.3 million
and have been excluded from our comparable restaurant sales calculation for the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
.
(3)
The stated menu price changes exclude the impact of product mix shifts to new menu offerings.
Our comparable restaurant sales represent the growth from restaurants opened 18 months or more. For the
thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
, combined U.S. comparable restaurant sales increased due to increases in general menu prices and product mix, partially offset by decreases from traffic. Customer traffic decreases were primarily due to Bonefish Grill, which lapped higher promotional activities in fiscal year 2014. In future quarters, we will slow our Bonefish Grill restaurant development until there is improvement in our sales results.
Comparable restaurant sales for South Korea decreased for the
thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
due to decreases in traffic, partially offset by increases from product mix and general menu prices. Customer traffic decreased in South Korea due to macro-economic conditions and, during the
thirteen weeks ended June 28, 2015
, the outbreak of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS).
For the
thirteen weeks ended June 28, 2015
, comparable restaurant sales for Brazil increased due to increases in general menu prices, partially offset by decreases from traffic and product mix. Customer traffic decreases in Brazil were primarily due to timing of the Carnival holiday in 2015 and the impact of new restaurant units on the existing restaurant
32
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
base. For the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
, comparable restaurant sales for Brazil increased due to increases in general menu prices and traffic, partially offset by decreases from product mix.
Average Restaurant Unit Volumes and Operating Weeks
Following is a summary of the average restaurant unit volumes and operating weeks:
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Average restaurant unit volumes (weekly):
U.S.
Outback Steakhouse
$
66,794
$
63,836
$
69,218
$
65,769
Carrabba’s Italian Grill
$
58,462
$
57,655
$
60,684
$
59,489
Bonefish Grill
$
59,389
$
62,679
$
62,034
$
63,959
Fleming’s Prime Steakhouse & Wine Bar
$
81,015
$
78,478
$
84,940
$
82,576
International
Outback Steakhouse - Brazil (1)
$
80,312
$
112,479
$
88,789
$
111,895
Outback Steakhouse - South Korea (2)
$
36,961
$
40,523
$
43,454
$
44,310
Operating weeks:
U.S.
Outback Steakhouse
8,437
8,457
16,870
16,830
Carrabba’s Italian Grill
3,172
3,120
6,334
6,175
Bonefish Grill
2,668
2,499
5,305
4,926
Fleming’s Prime Steakhouse & Wine Bar
858
858
1,716
1,695
International
Outback Steakhouse - Brazil
869
692
1,692
1,330
Outback Steakhouse - South Korea
981
1,387
1,988
2,773
____________________
(1)
Translated at an average exchange rate of
3.08
and
2.26
for the thirteen weeks ended
June 28, 2015
and
June 29, 2014
, respectively, and
2.87
and
2.31
for the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
and
June 29, 2014
, respectively.
(2)
Translated at an average exchange rate of
1,095.41
and
1,028.98
for the thirteen weeks ended
June 28, 2015
and
June 29, 2014
, respectively, and
1,097.61
and
1,050.91
for the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
and
June 29, 2014
, respectively.
COSTS AND EXPENSES
Cost of sales
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
(dollars in millions)
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Change
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Change
Cost of sales
$
357.5
$
358.9
$
744.9
$
732.5
% of Restaurant sales
32.7
%
32.5
%
0.2
%
32.6
%
32.5
%
0.1
%
Cost of sales, consisting of food and beverage costs, increased as a percentage of Restaurant sales in the
thirteen weeks ended June 28, 2015
as compared to the
thirteen weeks ended June 29, 2014
. The increase as a percentage of Restaurant sales was primarily due to: (i) 1.1% from higher commodity costs, primarily beef, and (ii) 0.7% from product mix. These increases were offset by decreases as a percentage of Restaurant sales due to: (i) 1.0% from the impact of certain cost savings initiatives and (ii) 0.7% from menu price increases.
33
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
Cost of sales increased as a percentage of Restaurant sales in the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
as compared to the
twenty-six weeks ended June 29, 2014
. The increase as a percentage of Restaurant sales was primarily due to:
(i) 1.2% from higher commodity costs, primarily beef, and (ii) 0.5% from product mix. These increases were offset by decreases as a percentage of Restaurant sales due to: (i) 1.1% from the impact of certain cost savings initiatives and (ii) 0.6% from menu price increases.
Labor and other related expenses
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
(dollars in millions)
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Change
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Change
Labor and other related
$
301.0
$
302.5
$
625.0
$
613.9
% of Restaurant sales
27.5
%
27.4
%
0.1
%
27.3
%
27.2
%
0.1
%
Labor and other related expenses include all direct and indirect labor costs incurred in operations, including distribution expense to managing partners, costs related to deferred compensation plans and other restaurant-level incentive compensation expenses. Labor and other related expenses increased as a percentage of Restaurant sales in the
thirteen weeks ended June 28, 2015
as compared to the
thirteen weeks ended June 29, 2014
. The increase as a percentage of Restaurant sales was primarily due to: (i) 0.9% from higher kitchen and service labor costs due to higher wage rates and lunch expansion across certain concepts, (ii) 0.4% from higher field management compensation and bonuses based on individual restaurant performance and (iii) 0.3% due to higher health insurance expenses. These increases were offset by decreases as a percentage of Restaurant sales primarily attributable to: (i) 0.6% from higher U.S. average unit volumes, (ii) 0.5% from the impact of certain cost savings initiatives and (iii) 0.3% due to the favorable resolution of a payroll tax audit contingency.
Labor and other related expenses increased as a percentage of Restaurant sales in the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
as compared to the
twenty-six weeks ended June 29, 2014
. The increase as a percentage of Restaurant sales was primarily due to: (i) 0.9% from higher kitchen and service labor costs due to higher wage rates and lunch expansion across certain concepts, (ii) 0.2% due to higher health insurance and (iii) 0.1% from higher field management bonuses based on individual restaurant performance. These increases were offset by decreases as a percentage of Restaurant sales primarily attributable to: (i) 0.6% from higher U.S. average unit volumes, (ii) 0.4% from the impact of certain cost savings initiatives and (iii) 0.1% due to the favorable resolution of a payroll tax audit contingency.
Other restaurant operating expenses
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
(dollars in millions)
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Change
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Change
Other restaurant operating
$
254.3
$
265.3
$
518.3
$
521.8
% of Restaurant sales
23.3
%
24.0
%
(0.7
)%
22.7
%
23.1
%
(0.4
)%
Other restaurant operating expenses include certain unit-level operating costs such as operating supplies, rent, repairs and maintenance, advertising expenses, utilities, pre-opening costs and other occupancy costs. The decrease as a percentage of Restaurant sales in the
thirteen weeks ended June 28, 2015
as compared to the
thirteen weeks ended June 29, 2014
was primarily due to: (i) 0.5% from higher U.S. average unit volumes, (ii) 0.4% from a decrease in marketing, with a shift to digital advertising from television and (iii) 0.2% from the impact of certain cost savings initiatives. The decreases were partially offset by increases as a percentage of Restaurant sales primarily due to: (i) 0.2% from repairs and maintenance, (ii) 0.1% from an increase in operating supplies primarily due to lunch expansion and (iii) 0.1% from an increase in general liability insurance expense.
34
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
The decrease as a percentage of Restaurant sales in the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
as compared to the
twenty-six weeks ended June 29, 2014
was primarily due to: (i) 0.6% from higher U.S. average unit volumes, (ii) 0.4% from a decrease in marketing, with a shift to digital advertising from television and (iii) 0.2% from the impact of certain cost savings initiatives. The decreases were partially offset by increases as a percentage of Restaurant sales primarily due to: (i) 0.2% from an increase in general liability insurance expense, (ii) 0.2% from an increase in operating supplies primarily due to lunch expansion, (iii) 0.2% from repairs and maintenance and (iv) 0.1% from the write-off of deferred rent liabilities in 2014.
Depreciation and amortization
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
(dollars in millions)
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Change
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Change
Depreciation and amortization
$
47.4
$
48.6
$
93.9
$
94.8
% of Total revenues
4.3
%
4.4
%
(0.1
)%
4.1
%
4.2
%
(0.1
)%
Depreciation and amortization expense decreased as a percentage of Total revenues in the
thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
as compared to the
thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 29, 2014
. The decrease as a percentage of Total revenues was primarily due to less depreciation for certain information technology assets that fully depreciated in the fourth quarter of 2014, the sale of Roy’s in the first quarter of 2015 and lower depreciation for South Korea assets due to impairments related to the International Restaurant Closure Initiative. These decreases were partially offset by increases as a percentage of Total revenues primarily due to additional depreciation expense related to the opening of new restaurants and the remodel of existing restaurants.
General and administrative
General and administrative expense includes salaries and benefits, management incentive programs, related payroll tax and benefits, other employee-related costs and professional services. Following is a summary of the changes in general and administrative expenses:
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
(dollars in millions)
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 28, 2015
For the period ended June 29, 2014
$
72.3
$
146.3
Change from:
Incentive compensation
5.3
5.9
Life insurance investments
1.9
2.4
Employee stock-based compensation
0.8
1.8
Compensation, benefits and payroll tax
(2.4
)
(4.8
)
Foreign exchange
(1.5
)
(2.1
)
Other
(0.4
)
(0.3
)
For the period ended June 28, 2015
$
76.0
$
149.2
During the
thirteen weeks ended June 28, 2015
, general and administrative expense increased from the thirteen weeks ended June 29, 2014, primarily from the following items:
•
Incentive compensation was higher due to improved performance against current year objectives compared to prior year.
•
A net decrease in the cash surrender value of life insurance investments related to our partner deferred compensation programs resulted in higher expense.
35
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
•
Employee compensation, benefits and payroll tax was lower primarily due to our organizational realignment in the second half of fiscal 2014.
•
Foreign exchange primarily includes the depreciation of the Brazil Real.
During the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
, general and administrative expense increased primarily from the following items:
•
Incentive compensation was higher due to improved performance against current year objectives compared to prior year.
•
A net decrease in the cash surrender value of life insurance investments related to our partner deferred compensation programs resulted in higher expense.
•
Employee stock-based compensation increased due to additional grants.
•
Employee compensation, benefits and payroll tax was lower primarily due to our organizational realignment in the second half of fiscal 2014.
•
Foreign exchange primarily includes the depreciation of the Brazil Real.
Provision for impaired assets and restaurant closings
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
(dollars in millions)
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Change
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Change
Provision for impaired assets and restaurant closings
$
0.9
$
1.0
$
(0.1
)
$
10.0
$
7.1
$
2.9
Restaurant Closure Initiatives -
In fiscal 2014, we decided to close
36
underperforming international locations, primarily in South Korea. In connection with the International Restaurant Closure Initiative, we incurred pre-tax restaurant closing costs of approximately
($0.3) million
and
$6.1 million
during the
thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
. As a result of the International Restaurant Closure Initiative, we expect to incur additional pre-tax restaurant closing costs of approximately
$1.0 million
, including costs associated with lease obligations and employee terminations, through the third quarter of 2015.
In the fourth quarter of 2013, we completed an assessment of our domestic restaurant base and decided to close
22
underperforming domestic locations. Approximately
$1.3 million
and
$6.0 million
of pre-tax restaurant closing costs were incurred during the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
and
June 29, 2014
, respectively, in connection with the Domestic Restaurant Closure Initiative.
Other Disposals -
During the
thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
, we recognized additional pre-tax asset impairment charges of $0.7 million for corporate aircraft classified as held for sale.
The remaining restaurant impairment and closing charges resulted from the carrying value of a restaurant’s assets exceeding its estimated fair market value, primarily due to locations identified for relocation.
See Note
2
-
Disposals, Exit Costs and Acquisitions
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
36
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
Income from operations
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
(dollars in millions)
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Change
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Change
Income from operations
$
62.6
$
62.4
$
0.2
$
160.3
$
152.4
$
7.9
% of Total revenues
5.7
%
5.6
%
0.1
%
7.0
%
6.7
%
0.3
%
The increase in income from operations generated in the
thirteen weeks ended June 28, 2015
as compared to the
thirteen weeks ended June 29, 2014
was primarily due to an increase in operating margin at the restaurant-level, partially offset by higher general and administrative expense.
The increase in income from operations generated in the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
as compared to the
twenty-six weeks ended June 29, 2014
was primarily due to an increase in operating margin at the restaurant-level, partially offset by higher restaurant closing costs from our International Restaurant Closure Initiative and higher general and administrative expense.
Other income (expense), net
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
(dollars in millions)
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Change
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Change
Other income (expense), net
$
0.1
$
0.3
$
(0.2
)
$
(1.1
)
$
0.2
$
(1.3
)
The increase in other income (expense), net in the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
as compared to the
twenty-six weeks ended June 29, 2014
was primarily due to the sale of our Roy’s business.
Interest expense, net
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
(dollars in millions)
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Change
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Change
Interest expense, net
$
12.9
$
15.1
$
(2.2
)
$
26.1
$
31.7
$
(5.6
)
The decrease in net interest expense in the
thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
as compared to the
thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 29, 2014
was primarily attributable to the refinancing of the Senior Secured Credit Facilities in March 2015 and May 2014 and the repayment of long-term debt during fiscal year 2014.
Provision for income taxes
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Change
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Change
Effective income tax rate
29.9
%
24.1
%
5.8
%
27.1
%
24.6
%
2.5
%
The net increase in the effective income tax rate for the
thirteen weeks ended June 28, 2015
was due to: (i) the favorable resolution of a payroll tax audit contingency that resulted in a deferred tax adjustment and (ii) a change in the blend of taxable income across our U.S. and international subsidiaries. The net increase in the effective income tax rate for the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
was due to: (i) a change in the blend of taxable income across our U.S. and international subsidiaries and (ii) the favorable resolution of a payroll tax audit contingency that resulted in a deferred
37
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
tax adjustment.
See Note
7
-
Accrued and Other Current Liabilities
for additional details regarding the payroll tax audit contingency.
SEGMENT PERFORMANCE
During the first quarter of 2015, we recast our segment reporting to reflect two reportable segments, U.S. and International, which reflects changes made in how we manage our business, review operating performance and allocate resources. Our U.S. segment includes all brands operating in the U.S. while brands operating outside the U.S. are included in the International segment. All prior period information was recast to reflect this change.
Our reporting segments are organized based on restaurant concept and geographic location. Resources are allocated and performance is assessed by our CEO, whom we have determined to be our Chief Operating Decision Maker. Following is a summary of reporting segments:
SEGMENT
CONCEPT
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
U.S.
Outback Steakhouse
United States of America, including Puerto Rico
Carrabba’s Italian Grill
Bonefish Grill
Fleming’s Prime Steakhouse & Wine Bar
International
Outback Steakhouse (1)
South Korea, Brazil, Hong Kong, China
Carrabba’s Italian Grill (Abbraccio)
Brazil
________________
(1)
Includes international franchise locations in 18 countries and Guam.
Revenues for all segments include only transactions with customers and include no intersegment revenues. Excluded from net income from operations for U.S. and International are legal and certain corporate costs not directly related to the performance of the segments, interest and other expenses related to our credit agreements and derivative instruments, certain stock-based compensation expenses, certain bonus expense and certain insurance expenses managed centrally.
Following is a reconciliation of segment income from operations to the consolidated operating results:
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
(dollars in thousands)
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Segment income from operations
U.S.
$
93,265
$
81,268
$
220,673
$
188,169
International
5,727
8,282
14,606
24,507
Total segment income from operations
98,992
89,550
235,279
212,676
Unallocated corporate operating expense - Cost of sales, Labor and other related and Other restaurant operating
7,977
6,728
7,689
11,322
Unallocated corporate operating expense - Depreciation and amortization and General and administrative
(44,384
)
(33,887
)
(82,682
)
(71,581
)
Unallocated corporate operating expense
(36,407
)
(27,159
)
(74,993
)
(60,259
)
Total income from operations
62,585
62,391
160,286
152,417
Loss on extinguishment and modification of debt
(2,638
)
(11,092
)
(2,638
)
(11,092
)
Other income (expense), net
57
317
(1,090
)
153
Interest expense, net
(12,867
)
(15,109
)
(26,065
)
(31,707
)
Income before provision for income taxes
$
47,137
$
36,507
$
130,493
$
109,771
38
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
U.S. Segment
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
(dollars in thousands)
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Revenues
Restaurant Sales
$
977,260
$
961,608
$
2,033,364
$
1,966,483
Other Revenues
5,718
5,435
11,628
11,186
Total revenues
$
982,978
$
967,043
$
2,044,992
$
1,977,669
Restaurant-level operating margin
15.6
%
15.2
%
16.8
%
16.4
%
Income from operations
93,265
81,268
220,673
188,169
Operating income margin
9.5
%
8.4
%
10.8
%
9.5
%
Restaurant sales
Following is a summary of the change in U.S. segment restaurant sales for the
thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
:
(dollars in millions)
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
For the period ended June 29, 2014
$
961.6
$
1,966.5
Change from:
Comparable restaurant sales (1)
19.1
53.9
Restaurant openings (1)
18.4
34.5
Change in fiscal year
—
22.8
Divestiture of Roy’s
(17.5
)
(31.1
)
Restaurant closings
(4.3
)
(13.2
)
For the period ended June 28, 2015
$
977.3
$
2,033.4
____________________
(1)
Summation of quarterly changes for restaurant openings and comparable restaurant sales will not total to annual amounts as the restaurants that meet the definition of a comparable restaurant will differ each period based on when the restaurant opened.
The increase in U.S. Restaurant sales in the
thirteen weeks ended June 28, 2015
was primarily attributable to: (i) an increase in comparable restaurant sales at our existing restaurants and (ii) the opening of
47
new restaurants not included in our comparable restaurant sales base. The increase in U.S. Restaurant sales was partially offset by: (i) the sale of 20 Roy’s restaurants in January 2015, (ii) lower comparable restaurant sales at Bonefish Grill and (iii) the closing of
nine
restaurants since March 30, 2014.
The increase in U.S. Restaurant sales in the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
was primarily attributable to: (i) an increase in comparable restaurant sales at our existing restaurants, (ii) the opening of
57
new restaurants not included in our comparable restaurant sales base and (iii) two additional operating days during the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
due to a change in our fiscal year-end in 2014. The increase in U.S. Restaurant sales was partially offset by: (i) the sale of 20 Roy’s restaurants in January 2015, (ii) the closing of
27
restaurants since
December 31, 2013
and (iii) lower comparable restaurant sales at Bonefish Grill.
Restaurant-level operating margin
The increase in U.S. restaurant-level operating margin in the
thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
as compared to the
thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 29, 2014
, was primarily due to the impact of certain cost saving initiatives, higher average unit volumes, pricing and lower marketing spend. This increase was partially offset by commodity inflation, product mix and higher kitchen and labor costs due to lunch rollout and labor inflation.
39
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
Income from operations
The increase in U.S. income from operations generated in the
thirteen weeks ended June 28, 2015
as compared to the
thirteen weeks ended June 29, 2014
was primarily due to higher restaurant-level operating margin and lower General and administrative expense. General and administrative expense for the U.S. segment decreased primarily due to lower compensation and benefits driven by our organizational realignment in the second half of fiscal 2014 and lower professional fees.
The increase in U.S. income from operations generated in the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
as compared to the
twenty-six weeks ended June 29, 2014
was primarily due to: (i) higher restaurant-level operating margin, (ii) a decrease in restaurant closing costs related to the Domestic Restaurant Closure Initiative and (iii) lower General and administrative expense. General and administrative expense for the U.S. segment decreased primarily due to lower compensation and benefits driven by our organizational realignment in the second half of fiscal 2014.
International Segment
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
(dollars in thousands)
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Revenues
Restaurant sales
$
115,499
$
142,829
$
254,205
$
288,479
Other revenues
1,120
1,040
2,459
2,623
Total revenues
$
116,619
$
143,869
$
256,664
$
291,102
Restaurant-level operating margin
16.8
%
17.2
%
19.5
%
18.6
%
Income from operations
$
5,727
$
8,282
$
14,606
$
24,507
Operating income margin
4.9
%
5.8
%
5.7
%
8.4
%
Restaurant sales
Following is a summary of the changes in International segment restaurant sales for the
thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
:
(dollars in millions)
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
For the period ended June 29, 2014
$
142.8
$
288.5
Change from:
Effect of foreign currency translation
(28.3
)
(40.7
)
Restaurant closings
(19.5
)
(40.5
)
Restaurant openings
22.2
43.7
Comparable restaurant sales
(1.7
)
1.7
Change in fiscal year
—
1.5
For the period ended June 28, 2015
$
115.5
$
254.2
The decrease in Restaurant sales in the
thirteen weeks ended June 28, 2015
was primarily attributable to: (i) the effect of foreign currency translation of the Brazil Real relative to the U.S. dollar, (ii) the closing of
46
restaurants since March 30, 2014 and (iii) lower comparable restaurant sales in South Korea. The decrease in restaurant sales was partially offset by: (i) the opening of
42
new restaurants not included in our comparable restaurant sales base and (ii) an increase in comparable restaurant sales in Brazil.
40
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
The decrease in Restaurant sales in the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
was primarily attributable to: (i) the effect of foreign currency translation of the Brazil Real relative to the U.S. dollar, (ii) the closing of
49
restaurants since
December 31, 2013
and (iii) lower comparable restaurant sales in South Korea. The decrease in restaurant sales was partially offset by: (i) the opening of
43
new restaurants not included in our comparable restaurant sales base, (ii) an increase in comparable restaurant sales in Brazil and (iii) two additional operating days during the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
due to a change in our fiscal year-end in 2014.
Restaurant-level operating margin
The decrease in International restaurant-level operating margin in the
thirteen weeks ended June 28, 2015
as compared to the
thirteen weeks ended June 29, 2014
was primarily due to commodity and labor inflation and investment spending related to the launching of Abbraccio in Brazil. The decrease was partially offset by the opening of new restaurants, the impact of certain cost saving initiatives and pricing.
The increase in International restaurant-level operating margin in the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
as compared to the
twenty-six weeks ended June 29, 2014
was primarily due to the opening of new restaurants, the impact of certain cost saving initiatives and pricing. This increase was partially offset by commodity and labor inflation.
Income from operations
The decrease in International income from operations in the
thirteen weeks ended June 28, 2015
as compared to the
thirteen weeks ended June 29, 2014
was primarily due to lower restaurant-level operating margin partially offset by lower general and administrative expense.
The decrease in International income from operations in the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
as compared to the
twenty-six weeks ended June 29, 2014
was primarily due to costs related to the International Restaurant Closure Initiative, partially offset by higher restaurant-level operating margin.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In addition to the results provided in accordance with U.S. GAAP, we provide non-GAAP measures which present operating results on an adjusted basis. These are supplemental measures of performance that are not required by or presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP and include the following: (i) system-wide sales, (ii) Adjusted restaurant-level operating margins, (iii) Adjusted income from operations and the corresponding margins, (iv) Adjusted net income and (v) Adjusted diluted earnings per share.
Although we believe these non-GAAP measures enhance investors’ understanding of our business and performance, these non-GAAP financial measures are not intended to replace accompanying U.S. GAAP financial measures. These metrics are not necessarily comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.
41
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
System-Wide Sales
System-wide sales is a non-GAAP financial measure that includes sales of all restaurants operating under our brand names, whether we own them or not. Management uses this information to make decisions about future plans for the development of additional restaurants and new concepts, as well as evaluation of current operations. System-wide sales comprise sales of Company-owned and franchised restaurants. Following is a summary of sales of Company-owned restaurants:
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
COMPANY-OWNED RESTAURANT SALES (dollars in millions)
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
U.S.
Outback Steakhouse
$
563
$
539
$
1,167
$
1,106
Carrabba’s Italian Grill
185
180
384
367
Bonefish Grill
158
157
329
315
Fleming’s Prime Steakhouse & Wine Bar
70
67
146
140
Other
1
18
7
38
Total
977
961
2,033
1,966
International
Outback Steakhouse-Brazil
70
78
151
149
Outback Steakhouse-South Korea
36
56
86
123
Other
10
9
18
17
Total
116
143
255
289
Total Company-owned restaurant sales
$
1,093
$
1,104
$
2,288
$
2,255
The following table provides a summary of sales of franchised restaurants, which are not included in our consolidated financial results, and our income from the royalties and/or service fees that franchisees pay us based generally on a percentage of sales. The following table does not represent our sales and is presented only as an indicator of changes in the restaurant system, which management believes is important information regarding the health of our restaurant concepts and in determining our royalties and/or service fees.
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
FRANCHISE SALES (dollars in millions) (1)
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Outback Steakhouse
U.S.
$
86
$
81
$
174
$
165
International
29
30
58
59
Total
115
111
232
224
Carrabba’s Italian Grill
2
1
3
2
Bonefish Grill
3
3
6
7
Total franchise sales (1)
$
120
$
115
$
241
$
233
Income from franchise sales (2)
$
4
$
5
$
9
$
10
_____________________
(1)
Franchise sales are not included in Total revenues in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
(2)
Represents the franchise royalty and the portion of total income related to restaurant operations included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income in Other revenues.
42
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
Other Non-GAAP Financial Measures
The following information provides a reconciliation of a non-GAAP financial measure to the most comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. The use of other non-GAAP financial measures permits investors to assess the operating performance of our business relative to our performance based on U.S. GAAP results and relative to other companies within the restaurant industry by isolating the effects of certain items that vary from period to period without correlation to core operating performance or that vary widely among similar companies. However, our inclusion of these adjusted measures should not be construed as an indication that our future results will be unaffected by unusual or infrequent items or that the items for which we have made adjustments are unusual or infrequent. We believe that the disclosure of these non-GAAP measures is useful to investors as they form the basis for how our management team and the Board evaluate our operating performance, allocate resources and establish employee incentive plans.
Adjusted restaurant-level operating margin
Restaurant-level operating margin is calculated as Restaurant sales after deduction of the main restaurant-level operating costs, which includes Cost of sales, Labor and other related and Other restaurant operating. The following table shows the percentages of certain operating cost financial statement line items in relation to Restaurant sales:
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
U.S. GAAP
ADJUSTED (1)
U.S. GAAP
ADJUSTED (2)
Restaurant sales
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
Cost of sales
32.7
%
32.7
%
32.5
%
32.5
%
Labor and other related
27.5
%
27.8
%
27.4
%
27.4
%
Other restaurant operating
23.3
%
23.3
%
24.0
%
24.0
%
Restaurant-level operating margin
16.5
%
16.2
%
16.1
%
16.1
%
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
U.S. GAAP
ADJUSTED (1)
U.S. GAAP
ADJUSTED (3)
Restaurant sales
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
Cost of sales
32.6
%
32.6
%
32.5
%
32.5
%
Labor and other related
27.3
%
27.4
%
27.2
%
27.2
%
Other restaurant operating
22.7
%
22.7
%
23.1
%
23.2
%
Restaurant-level operating margin
17.5
%
17.3
%
17.2
%
17.1
%
_________________
(1)
Includes a $2.7 million adjustment for payroll tax audit contingencies, which was recorded in Labor and other related.
(2)
No adjustments impacted Restaurant-level operating margins during the thirteen weeks ended June 29, 2014.
(3)
Includes an adjustment for the deferred rent liability write-off associated with the Domestic Restaurant Closure Initiative, which was recorded in Other restaurant operating during the twenty-six weeks ended June 29, 2014.
43
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
Adjusted income from operations, Adjusted net income and Adjusted diluted earnings per share
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
(in thousands, except per share data)
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Income from operations
$
62,585
$
62,391
$
160,286
$
152,417
Operating income margin
5.7
%
5.6
%
7.0
%
6.7
%
Adjustments:
Restaurant impairments and closing costs (1)
(63
)
—
8,807
4,929
Payroll tax audit contingency (2)
(2,671
)
—
(2,671
)
—
Purchased intangibles amortization (3)
1,123
1,532
2,406
2,990
Restaurant relocations and related costs (4)
122
—
1,291
—
Asset impairments and related costs (5)
746
—
746
—
Transaction-related expenses (6)
40
—
315
1,118
Total income from operations adjustments
(703
)
1,532
10,894
9,037
Adjusted income from operations
$
61,882
$
63,923
$
171,180
$
161,454
Adjusted operating income margin
5.6
%
5.8
%
7.4
%
7.1
%
Net income attributable to Bloomin’ Brands
$
32,226
$
26,391
$
92,814
$
80,124
Adjustments:
Income from operations adjustments
(703
)
1,532
10,894
9,037
Loss on disposal of business (7)
(121
)
—
1,030
—
Loss on extinguishment and modification of debt (8)
2,638
11,092
2,638
11,092
Total adjustments, before income taxes
1,814
12,624
14,562
20,129
Adjustment to provision for income taxes (9)
1,047
(4,847
)
(2,580
)
(7,542
)
Net adjustments
2,861
7,777
11,982
12,587
Adjusted net income
$
35,087
$
34,168
$
104,796
$
92,711
Diluted earnings per share
$
0.26
$
0.21
$
0.73
$
0.63
Adjusted diluted earnings per share
$
0.28
$
0.27
$
0.82
$
0.72
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
126,242
128,378
127,501
128,115
_________________
(1)
Represents expenses incurred in the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015 for the International and Domestic Restaurant Closure Initiatives and expenses incurred for the Domestic Restaurant Closure Initiative during the twenty-six weeks ended June 29, 2014.
(2)
Relates to a payroll tax audit contingency adjustment for the employer’s share of FICA taxes related to cash tips allegedly received and unreported by our employees during calendar year 2011, which is recorded in Labor and other related expenses. In addition, a deferred income tax adjustment has been recorded for the allowable income tax credits for the employer’s share of FICA taxes expected to be paid, which is included in (Benefit) provision for income taxes and offsets the adjustment to Labor and other related expenses. As a result, there is no impact to Net income from this adjustment.
(3)
Represents non-cash intangible amortization recorded as a result of the acquisition of our Brazil operations.
(4)
Represents asset impairment charges and accelerated depreciation incurred in connection with our relocation program.
(5)
Represents asset impairment charges and related costs associated with the decision to sell our corporate aircraft.
(6)
Relates primarily to costs incurred with the secondary offerings of our common stock in March 2015 and March 2014, respectively, and other transaction costs.
(7)
Primarily represents the sale of our Roy’s business.
(8)
Relates to the refinancing of our Senior Secured Credit Facility in March 2015 and May 2014, respectively.
(9)
Income tax effect of adjustments for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015 and June 29, 2014, respectively, are calculated based on the statutory rate applicable to jurisdictions in which the above non-GAAP adjustments relate. For the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015, a deferred income tax adjustment has been recorded for the allowable income tax credits for the employer’s share of FICA taxes expected to be paid. See footnote 2 to this table.
44
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
Liquidity and Capital Resources
LIQUIDITY
Our liquidity sources consist of cash flow from our operations, cash and cash equivalents and credit capacity under our credit facilities. We expect to use cash primarily for general operating expenses, principal and interest payments on our debt, the development of new restaurants and new markets, share repurchases and dividend payments, remodeling or relocating older restaurants, obligations related to our deferred compensation plans and investments in technology.
We believe that our expected liquidity sources are adequate to fund our anticipated cash usages, as described above, for the next 12 months. However, our ability to continue to meet these requirements and obligations will depend on, among other things, our ability to achieve anticipated levels of revenue and cash flow and our ability to manage costs and working capital successfully.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
- As of
June 28, 2015
and
December 28, 2014
, we had
$132.8 million
and
$165.7 million
, respectively, in cash and cash equivalents, of which
$74.0 million
and
$89.7 million
, respectively, was held by foreign affiliates, primarily in South Korea, a portion of which would be subject to additional taxes if repatriated to the United States. The international jurisdictions in which we have significant cash do not have any known restrictions that would prohibit the repatriation of cash and cash equivalents.
We consider the undistributed earnings related to our foreign affiliates as of
June 28, 2015
to be permanently reinvested and are expected to continue to be permanently reinvested. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred U.S. income tax liability on these undistributed earnings is not practicable because of the complexities associated with this hypothetical calculation. However, if we decide to exit a market, initiate a foreign corporate reorganization or identify an exception to our reinvestment policy of undistributed earnings, additional tax liabilities will be recorded.
During fiscal year 2014, we decided to close
36
underperforming international locations, primarily in South Korea. In connection with the International Restaurant Closure Initiative, we expect future cash expenditures of
$5.0 million
to
$7.0 million
, primarily related to lease liabilities, through
August 2022
. We believe our South Korea subsidiary has sufficient cash to meet these obligations and support ongoing operations.
Capital Expenditures
- We estimate that our capital expenditures will total between $225.0 million and $235.0 million in 2015. The amount of actual capital expenditures may be affected by general economic, financial, competitive, legislative and regulatory factors, among other things, including restrictions imposed by our borrowing arrangements. We expect to continue to review the level of capital expenditures throughout 2015.
45
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
Credit Facilities
- Our credit facilities consist of the Senior Secured Credit Facility and the CMBS Loan. See Note
8
-
Long-term Debt, Net
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. Following is a summary of principal payments and debt issuance from
December 31, 2013
to
June 28, 2015
:
SENIOR SECURED CREDIT FACILITY
2012 CMBS LOAN
(dollars in thousands)
TERM LOAN A
TERM LOAN B
REVOLVING FACILITY
FIRST MORTGAGE LOAN
FIRST MEZZANINE LOAN
SECOND MEZZANINE LOAN
TOTAL CREDIT FACILITIES
Balance as of
December 31, 2013
$
—
$
935,000
$
—
$
311,644
$
86,131
$
86,704
$
1,419,479
2014 new debt issued (1)
300,000
—
400,000
—
—
—
700,000
2014 payments (1)
(3,750
)
(710,000
)
(75,000
)
(11,879
)
(1,004
)
(637
)
(802,270
)
Balance as of
December 28, 2014
296,250
225,000
325,000
299,765
85,127
86,067
1,317,209
2015 new debt issued (2)
—
—
397,300
—
—
—
397,300
2015 payments (2)
(11,250
)
(225,000
)
(152,300
)
(5,844
)
(548
)
(360
)
(395,302
)
Balance as of
June 28, 2015
$
285,000
$
—
$
570,000
$
293,921
$
84,579
$
85,707
$
1,319,207
________________
(1)
$700.0 million relates to the refinancing of our Senior Secured Credit Facility, which did not increase total indebtedness.
(2)
$215.0 million relates to the refinancing of our Senior Secured Credit Facility, which did not increase total indebtedness.
We continue to evaluate whether we will make further payments of our outstanding debt ahead of scheduled maturities. Following is a summary of our outstanding credit facilities as of
June 28, 2015
:
PRINCIPAL MATURITY DATE
OUTSTANDING
(dollars in thousands)
INTEREST RATE
JUNE 28, 2015
ORIGINAL FACILITY
JUNE 28, 2015
DECEMBER 28, 2014
Term loan A, net of discount of $2.9 million (1)
2.17
%
$
300,000
May 2019
$
285,000
$
296,250
Term loan B, net of discount of $10.0 million
—
%
225,000
October 2019
—
225,000
Revolving credit facility (1) (2)
2.16
%
825,000
May 2019
570,000
325,000
Total Senior Secured Credit Facility
1,350,000
855,000
846,250
First mortgage loan (1)
4.11
%
324,800
April 2017
293,921
299,765
First mezzanine loan
9.00
%
87,600
April 2017
84,579
85,127
Second mezzanine loan
11.25
%
87,600
April 2017
85,707
86,067
Total 2012 CMBS loan
500,000
464,207
470,959
Total credit facilities
$
1,850,000
$
1,319,207
$
1,317,209
________________
(1)
Represents the weighted-average interest rate for the respective period.
(2)
Original facility of
$600.0 million
was increased to
$825.0 million
in March 2015.
On March 31, 2015, we amended our credit agreement to effect an increase of our existing revolving credit facility in order to fully pay down our existing Term Loan B on April 2, 2015. As of
June 28, 2015
, we had
$225.4 million
in available unused borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility, net of letters of credit of
$29.6 million
.
The Amended Credit Agreement contains mandatory prepayment requirements for Term loan A. We are required to prepay outstanding amounts under our term loans with
50%
of our annual excess cash flow, as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement. The amount of outstanding term loans required to be prepaid may vary based on our leverage ratio and year-end results. Other than the required minimum amortization premiums of
$15.0 million
, we do not anticipate any other payments will be required through the next fiscal year.
46
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
The 2012 CMBS Loan requires annual amortization payments ranging from approximately
$8.4 million
to
$10.6 million
, payable in scheduled monthly installments through March 2017, with the remaining balance due upon maturity in April 2017.
Our Amended Credit Agreement and 2012 CMBS Loan contain various financial and non-financial covenants. A violation of these covenants could negatively impact our liquidity by restricting our ability to borrow under the revolving credit facility and cause an acceleration of the amounts due under the credit facilities. See our Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about our debt covenants. As of
June 28, 2015
and
December 28, 2014
, we were in compliance with these debt covenants.
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk -
In September 2014, we entered into variable-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements with eight
counterparties to hedge a portion of the cash flows of our variable rate debt. The swap agreements have an aggregate notional amount of
$400.0 million
, a forward start date of
June 30, 2015
, and mature on
May 16, 2019
. Under the terms of the swap agreements, we will pay a weighted-average fixed rate of
2.02%
on the
$400.0 million
notional amount and receive payments from the counterparty based on the
30-day LIBOR
rate.
See Note
11
-
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
SUMMARY OF CASH FLOWS
The following table presents a summary of our cash flows provided by (used in) operating, investing and financing activities for the periods indicated:
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
(dollars in thousands)
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
197,427
$
97,246
Net cash used in investing activities
(89,321
)
(101,169
)
Net cash used in financing activities
(139,118
)
(52,676
)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
(1,960
)
2,571
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
$
(32,972
)
$
(54,028
)
Operating activities
- Net cash provided by operating activities increased during the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
, as compared to the
twenty-six weeks ended June 29, 2014
primarily due to: (i) timing of collections of gift card receivables, (ii) lower income tax payments, (iii) lower cash interest payments and (iv) timing of payments on accounts payable. These increases were partially offset by: (i) increased purchases of inventory and (ii) an increase in the redemption of gift cards.
Investing activities
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
(dollars in thousands)
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Capital expenditures
$
(114,251
)
$
(97,619
)
Purchases of life insurance policies
(3,392
)
(1,040
)
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired
—
(3,063
)
Proceeds received from life insurance policies
14,942
627
Proceeds from sale of a business
7,798
—
Proceeds from disposal of property, fixtures and equipment
3,104
562
Net change in restricted cash, net
2,478
(636
)
Net cash used in investing activities
$
(89,321
)
$
(101,169
)
47
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
Net cash used in investing activities for the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
consisted primarily of capital expenditures, partially offset by the following: (i) net proceeds from life insurance policies, (ii) proceeds from the sale of Roy’s and (iii) proceeds from the disposal of property, fixtures and equipment. Net cash used in investing activities for the
twenty-six weeks ended June 29, 2014
consisted primarily of capital expenditures and net cash paid to acquire certain franchise restaurants.
Financing activities
TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
(dollars in thousands)
JUNE 28, 2015
JUNE 29, 2014
Repayments of debt
$
(396,719
)
$
(733,090
)
Repurchase and retirement of common stock
(100,525
)
(799
)
Repayments of partner deposits and accrued partner obligations
(27,231
)
(13,909
)
Cash dividends paid on common stock
(14,814
)
—
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
(2,562
)
(2,470
)
Financing fees
(1,235
)
(4,492
)
Purchase of limited partnerships and noncontrolling interests
(652
)
(17,211
)
Proceeds from borrowings
397,336
712,088
Proceeds from exercise of stock options, net of shares withheld for employee taxes
6,012
6,112
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
1,272
1,095
Net cash used in financing activities
$
(139,118
)
$
(52,676
)
Net cash used in financing activities for the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
was primarily attributable to the following: (i) repayments of the Term loan B due to the Senior Secured Credit Facility refinancing in March 2015 and voluntary prepayments, (ii) the repurchase of common stock, (iii) repayments of partner deposits and accrued partner obligations and (iv) payment of cash dividends on our common stock. Net cash used in financing activities was partially offset by the following: (i) proceeds from the refinancing of the Senior Secured Credit Facility and revolving credit facilities and (ii) proceeds from the exercise of stock options.
Net cash used in financing activities for the
twenty-six weeks ended June 29, 2014
was primarily attributable to the following: (i) repayments of the Term loan B due to the Senior Secured Credit Facility refinancing in May 2014 and voluntary prepayments, (ii) the purchase of outstanding limited partnership interests in certain restaurants, (iii) repayments of partner deposits and accrued partner obligations and (iv) financing fees related to the Senior Secured Credit Facility refinancing. Net cash used in financing activities was partially offset by proceeds from the refinancing of the Senior Secured Credit Facility and proceeds from the exercise of stock options.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Following is a summary of our current assets, current liabilities and working capital:
JUNE 28,
DECEMBER 28,
(dollars in thousands)
2015
2014
Current assets
$
446,481
$
600,551
Current liabilities
702,496
840,110
Working capital (deficit)
$
(256,015
)
$
(239,559
)
Working capital (deficit) totaled
($256.0) million
and
($239.6) million
as of
June 28, 2015
and
December 28, 2014
, respectively, and included Unearned revenue from unredeemed gift cards of
$258.5 million
and
$376.7 million
as of
June 28, 2015
and
December 28, 2014
, respectively. We have, and in the future may continue to have, negative working capital balances (as is common for many restaurant companies). We operate successfully with negative working capital
48
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued
because cash collected on restaurant sales is typically received before payment is due on our current liabilities, and our inventory turnover rates require relatively low investment in inventories. Additionally, ongoing cash flows from restaurant operations and gift card sales are used to service debt obligations and to make capital expenditures.
Deferred Compensation Programs
The deferred compensation obligation due to managing and chef partners was
$140.8 million
and
$155.6 million
at
June 28, 2015
and
December 28, 2014
, respectively. We invest in various corporate-owned life insurance policies, which are held within an irrevocable grantor or “rabbi” trust account for settlement of our obligations under the deferred compensation plans. The rabbi trust is funded through our voluntary contributions. During the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
, we sold $16.2 million of rabbi trust corporate-owned life insurance policies to settle obligations under the deferred compensation plans. The unfunded obligation for managing and chef partners’ deferred compensation is
$80.7 million
at
June 28, 2015
.
We use capital to fund the deferred compensation plans and currently expect annual cash funding of $18.0 million to $22.0 million. Actual funding of the deferred compensation obligations and future funding requirements may vary significantly depending on the actual performance compared to targets, timing of deferred payments of partner contracts, forfeiture rates, number of partner participants, growth of partner investments and our funding strategy.
DIVIDENDS AND SHARE REPURCHASES
In December 2014, the Board adopted a dividend policy under which it intends to declare quarterly cash dividends on shares of our common stock. Future dividend payments are dependent on our earnings, financial condition, capital expenditure requirements and other factors that the Board considers relevant.
The Board approved the 2014 Share Repurchase Program in December 2014. Under the share repurchase program, we were authorized to repurchase up to
$100.0 million
of our outstanding common stock. As of
June 28, 2015
, no shares remain to be repurchased under this authorization.
In August 2015, the Board approved the 2015 Share Repurchase Program under which we are authorized to repurchase up to
$100.0 million
of our outstanding common stock. The authorization for the 2015 Share Repurchase Program will expire on
February 3, 2017
. As of the date of this filing,
no
shares had been repurchased under the 2015 Share Repurchase Program.
The following table presents our dividends and share repurchases from December 29, 2014 through
June 28, 2015
:
(dollars in thousands)
DIVIDENDS PAID
SHARE REPURCHASES
TAXES RELATED TO SETTLEMENT OF EQUITY AWARDS
TOTAL
Thirteen weeks ended March 29, 2015 (1)
$
7,423
$
70,000
$
322
$
77,745
Thirteen weeks ended June 28, 2015
7,391
30,000
203
37,594
Total
$
14,814
$
100,000
$
525
$
115,339
________________
(1)
Includes the repurchase of
$70.0 million
of our common stock in connection with the secondary public offering by Bain Capital in March 2015.
Recently Issued Financial Accounting Standards
For a description of recently issued Financial Accounting Standards, see Note
1
-
Description of the Business and Basis of Presentation
of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
49
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates, changes in foreign currency exchange rates and changes in commodity prices. We believe that there have been no material changes in our market risk since
December 28, 2014
, except as set forth below. For further information on market risk, refer to Part II, Item 7A., “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 28, 2014
(the “2014 Form 10-K”).
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
We are subject to foreign currency exchange risk for our restaurants operating in foreign countries. Our exposures to foreign currency exchange risk are primarily related to fluctuations in the Brazil Real and the South Korea Won relative to the U.S. dollar. Our operations in other markets consist of Company-owned restaurants on a smaller scale than the markets identified above and franchised locations, from which we collect royalties in local currency. If foreign currency exchange rates depreciate in the countries in which we operate, we may experience declines in our operating results. For the
twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2015
, a 10% change in average foreign currency rates against the U.S. dollar would have increased or decreased our Total revenues and Net income for our consolidated foreign entities by $28.3 million and $1.4 million, respectively. Currently, we do not enter into currency forward exchange or option contracts to hedge foreign currency exposures.
50
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have established and maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
June 28, 2015
.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recent
thirteen weeks ended June 28, 2015
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
51
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
For a description of our legal proceedings, see Note
14
-
Commitments and Contingencies
, of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information discussed in this report, please consider the factors described in Part I, Item 1A., “Risk Factors” in our 2014 Form 10-K which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. There have not been any material changes to the risk factors described in our 2014 Form 10-K, but these are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
There were no sales of equity securities during the second quarter of 2015 that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933.
The following table provides information regarding our purchases of common stock during the
thirteen weeks ended June 28, 2015
:
REPORTING PERIOD
TOTAL NUMBER OF SHARES PURCHASED (1)
AVERAGE PRICE PAID PER SHARE
TOTAL NUMBER OF SHARES PURCHASED AS PART OF PUBLICLY ANNOUNCED PLANS OR PROGRAMS
APPROXIMATE DOLLAR VALUE OF SHARES THAT MAY YET BE PURCHASED UNDER THE PLANS OR PROGRAMS (2)
March 30, 2015 through April 26, 2015
12,428
$
23.47
—
$
30,000,000
April 27, 2015 through May 24, 2015
1,370,123
$
21.90
1,370,123
$
—
May 25, 2015 through June 28, 2015
—
$
—
—
$
—
Total
1,382,551
1,370,123
____________________
(1)
The Board authorized the repurchase of
$100.0 million
of our outstanding common stock as announced publicly in our press release issued on December 16, 2014 (the “2014 Share Repurchase Program). No additional shares may be repurchased under the 2014 Share Repurchase Program. Common stock purchased during the
thirteen weeks ended June 28, 2015
represented shares repurchased under this program in open-market transactions and
12,428
shares withheld for tax payments due upon the vesting of employee restricted stock awards.
(2)
The Board authorized the repurchase of
$100.0 million
of our outstanding common stock as announced publicly in our press release issued on August 4, 2015 (the “2015 Share Repurchase Program”). The authorization for the 2015 Share Repurchase Program will expire on
February 3, 2017
. As of the date of this filing,
no
shares had been repurchased under the 2015 Share Repurchase Program.
52
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
Item 6. Exhibits
EXHIBIT
NUMBER
DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS
FILINGS REFERENCED FOR
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
10.1
Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement and Incremental Amendment dated as of March 31, 2015, among OSI Restaurant Partners, LLC, OSI Holdco, Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent
March 29, 2015 Form 10-Q, Exhibit 10.1
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Filed herewith
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial and Administrative Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Filed herewith
32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
1
Filed herewith
32.2
Certification of Chief Financial and Administrative Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
1
Filed herewith
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document
Filed herewith
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
Filed herewith
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
Filed herewith
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
Filed herewith
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
Filed herewith
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
Filed herewith
1
These certifications are not deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. These certifications will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates them by reference.
53
Table of Contents
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date:
August 4, 2015
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC.
(Registrant)
By: /s/ David J. Deno
David J. Deno
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and
Administrative Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]