Brown & Brown
BRO
#1169
Rank
$19.89 B
Marketcap
$58.69
Share price
4.28%
Change (1 day)
-47.51%
Change (1 year)

Brown & Brown - 10-Q quarterly report FY


Text size:


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549
FORM 10-Q
 x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   
  For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005
   
or
   
 o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   
  For the transition period from                                to ________________

Commission File Number 0-7201


BROWN & BROWN, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
 
Florida
59-0864469
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
 
220 S. Ridgewood Ave., Daytona Beach, FL
32114
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(Zip Code)
   
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  (386) 252-9601

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes x   No o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  x    No o

The number of shares of the Registrant’s common stock, $.10 par value, outstanding as of August 2, 2005 was 69,143,344.
 




 
BROWN & BROWN, INC.
 
INDEX
 
 
PAGE
PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
    
 
Item 1.
Financial Statements (Unaudited):
 
    
 
 
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
2
    
 
 
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004
3
    
 
 
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
4
    
 
 
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5
    
 
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
13
    
 
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
23
    
 
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
24
    
PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION
 
    
 
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
25
    
 
Item 4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
26
    
 
Item 6.
Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
27
  
SIGNATURE
28
 

 
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
 
BROWN & BROWN, INC.
(UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except per share data)
 
  
For the three months
ended June 30,
 
For the six months
ended June 30,
 
 
 
2005 
 
2004 
 
2005 
 
2004 
 
REVENUES
         
Commissions and fees
 
$
192,738
 
$
156,749
 
$
393,053
 
$
321,063
 
Investment income
  
1,524
  
333
  
2,489
  
1,021
 
Other income, net
  
1,669
  
860
  
2,763
  
1,423
 
Total revenues
  
195,931
  
157,942
  
398,305
  
323,507
 
 
             
EXPENSES
             
Employee compensation and benefits
  
94,100
  
76,270
  
184,484
  
152,552
 
Non-cash stock grant compensation
  
788
  
665
  
1,679
  
1,510
 
Other operating expenses
  
25,980
  
19,983
  
53,122
  
41,379
 
Amortization
  
8,357
  
5,483
  
15,892
  
10,300
 
Depreciation
  
2,527
  
2,269
  
4,894
  
4,423
 
Interest
  
3,711
  
743
  
7,253
  
1,454
 
Total expenses
  
135,463
  
105,413
  
267,324
  
211,618
 
 
             
Income before income taxes
  
60,468
  
52,529
  
130,981
  
111,889
 
 
             
Income taxes
  
23,435
  
20,376
  
50,930
  
43,388
 
              
NET INCOME
 
$
37,033
 
$
32,153
 
$
80,051
 
$
68,501
 
 
             
Net income per share:
             
Basic
 
$
0.54
 
$
0.47
 
$
1.16
 
$
1.00
 
Diluted
 
$
0.53
 
$
0.46
 
$
1.15
 
$
0.99
 
              
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
             
Basic
  
69,156
  
68,790
  
69,159
  
68,736
 
Diluted
  
69,738
  
69,370
  
69,724
  
69,283
 
              
Dividends declared per share
 
$
0.08
 
$
0.07
 
$
0.16
 
$
0.14
 
 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
2

 
BROWN & BROWN, INC.
(UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except per share data)

 
 
 June 30,
 
 December 31,
 
 
 
 2005
 
  2004
 
      
ASSETS
     
Current assets:
     
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
42,940
 
$
188,106
 
Restricted cash and investments
  
236,504
  
147,483
 
Short-term investments
  
2,831
  
3,163
 
Premiums, commissions and fees receivable
  
217,209
  
172,395
 
Other current assets
  
24,280
  
28,819
 
Total current assets
  
523,764
  
539,966
 
        
Fixed assets, net
  
38,489
  
33,438
 
Goodwill
  
523,610
  
360,843
 
Amortizable intangible assets, net
  
363,543
  
293,009
 
Investments
  
7,940
  
9,328
 
Other assets
  
10,090
  
12,933
 
Total assets
 
$
1,467,436
 
$
1,249,517
 
        
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
       
Current liabilities:
       
Premiums payable to insurance companies
 
$
370,431
 
$
242,414
 
Premium deposits and credits due customers
  
24,002
  
32,273
 
Accounts payable
  
20,744
  
16,257
 
Accrued expenses
  
52,994
  
58,031
 
Current portion of long-term debt
  
49,699
  
16,135
 
Total current liabilities
  
517,870
  
365,110
 
        
Long-term debt
  
220,246
  
227,063
 
        
Deferred income taxes, net
  
25,555
  
24,859
 
        
Other liabilities
  
9,078
  
8,160
 
        
Shareholders’ equity:
       
Common stock, par value $.10 per share; authorized 280,000
       
shares; issued and outstanding, 69,143 shares at 2005 and
       
69,159 at 2004
  
6,914
  
6,916
 
Additional paid-in capital
  
189,371
  
187,280
 
Retained earnings
  
494,649
  
425,662
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income
  
3,753
  
4,467
 
Total shareholders’ equity
  
694,687
  
624,325
 
        
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
 
$
1,467,436
 
$
1,249,517
 
 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
3


BROWN & BROWN, INC.
(UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)
  
For the six months
ended June 30,
 
  
 2005
 
 2004
 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
 
$
80,051
 
$
68,501
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
       
Amortization
  
15,892
  
10,300
 
Depreciation
  
4,894
  
4,423
 
Non-cash stock grant compensation
  
1,679
  
1,510
 
Deferred income taxes
  
925
  
1,121
 
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options
  
-
  
56
 
Net (gain) on sales of investments, fixed assets and customer accounts
  
(2,515
)
 
(1,747
)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect from insurance agency acquisitions and disposals:
       
Restricted cash and investments (increase)
  
(89,021
)
 
(16,651
)
Premiums, commissions and fees receivable (increase)
  
(44,814
)
 
(413
)
Other assets decrease
  
9,183
  
11,394
 
Premiums payable to insurance companies increase
  
128,046
  
16,291
 
Premium deposits and credits due customers (decrease) increase
  
(8,271
)
 
1,534
 
Accounts payable increase
  
4,441
  
7,859
 
Accrued expenses (decrease)
  
(5,219
)
 
(11,777
)
Other liabilities (decrease)
  
(988
)
 
(36
)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
  
94,283
  
92,365
 
        
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
       
Additions to fixed assets
  
(7,210
)
 
(4,535
)
Payments for businesses acquired, net of cash acquired
  
(215,155
)
 
(143,555
)
Proceeds from sales of fixed assets and customer accounts
  
2,005
  
2,339
 
Purchases of investments
  
(190
)
 
-
 
Proceeds from sales of investments
  
521
  
738
 
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
  
(220,029
)
 
(145,013
)
        
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
       
Borrowings on revolving credit facility
  
50,000
  
50,000
 
Payments on revolving credit facility
  
(50,000
)
 
-
 
Payments on long-term debt
  
(8,766
)
 
(8,928
)
Issuances of common stock for employee stock benefit plans
  
410
  
662
 
Cash dividend paid
  
(11,064
)
 
(9,628
)
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES
  
(19,420
)
 
32,106
 
        
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
  
(145,166
)
 
(20,542
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
  
188,106
  
56,926
 
        
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
 
$
42,940
 
$
36,384
 
 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
4

 
BROWN & BROWN, INC.
(UNAUDITED)
 
Note 1 - Basis of Financial Reporting
 
          The accompanying unaudited, condensed, consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“United States”) for interim financial information and with the instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. These unaudited, condensed, consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. 
 
          Results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2005.
 
 New Accounting Pronouncements
 
          In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued revised Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, “Share-Based Payment”, which replaces SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, and supersedes Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”. This revised statement, which requires that the cost of all share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements, establishes fair value as the measurement objective and requires entities to apply a fair-value-based measurement method in accounting for share-based payment transactions. The revised statement applies to all awards granted, modified, repurchased or cancelled on or after July 1, 2005. The Company will adopt revised SFAS No. 123 on its effective date, which is anticipated to be January 1, 2006.
 
Note 2 - Stock-Based Compensation and Incentive Plans
 
          The Company applies the intrinsic value-based method of APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, to account for its stock-based compensation and incentive plans. Accordingly, the Company presents the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure”, which requires presentation of pro forma net income and earnings per share information under SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”.
 
5

 
          Pursuant to the above disclosure requirements, the following table provides an expanded reconciliation for all periods presented that:  (1) adds back to reported net income the recorded expense under APB No. 25, net of related income tax effects; (2) deducts the total fair value expense under SFAS No. 123, net of related income tax effects; and (3) shows the reported and pro forma earnings per share amounts (in thousands, except per share data):

 
 
For the three months
ended June 30,
 
For the six months
ended June 30,
 
  
2005
 
2004
 
2005
 
2004
 
          
Net income, as reported
 
$
37,033
 
$
32,153
 
$
80,051
 
$
68,501
 
              
Total stock-based employee compensation
             
  cost included in the determination of
             
  net income, net of related income tax effects
  
483
  
408
  
1,028
  
926
 
              
Total stock-based employee compensation
             
  cost determined under fair value method
             
  for all awards, net of related income tax effects
  
(1,139
)
 
(1,340
)
 
(2,337
)
 
(2,790
)
              
Net income, pro forma
 
$
36,377
 
$
31,221
 
$
78,742
 
$
66,637
 
              
Earnings per share:
             
    Basic, as reported
 
$
0.54
 
$
0.47
 
$
1.16
 
$
1.00
 
    Basic, pro forma
 
$
0.53
 
$
0.45
 
$
1.14
 
$
0.97
 
              
    Diluted, as reported
 
$
0.53
 
$
0.46
 
$
1.15
 
$
0.99
 
    Diluted, pro forma
 
$
0.52
 
$
0.45
 
$
1.13
 
$
0.96
 
 
Note 3 - Basic and Diluted Net Income Per Share
 
          The following table sets forth the computation of basic net income per share and diluted net income per share (in thousands, except per-share data):
 
  
For the three months
ended June 30,
 
For the six months
ended June 30,
 
 
 
2005
 
2004
 
2005
 
 2004
 
          
Net income
 
$
37,033
 
$
32,153
 
$
80,051
 
$
68,501
 
              
Weighted average number of common shares
             
  outstanding
  
69,156
  
68,790
  
69,159
  
68,736
 
              
Dilutive effect of stock options using the
             
  treasury stock method
  
582
  
580
  
565
  
547
 
              
Weighted average number of shares
             
  outstanding
  
69,738
  
69,370
  
69,724
  
69,283
 
              
Net income per share:
             
Basic
 
$
0.54
 
$
0.47
 
$
1.16
 
$
1.00
 
Diluted
 
$
0.53
 
$
0.46
 
$
1.15
 
$
0.99
 
 
Note 4 - Business Combinations
 
During the first two quarters of 2005, the Company acquired the assets and assumed certain liabilities of 23 general insurance agencies and several books of business (“customer accounts”). The aggregate purchase price was $235,939,000 including $198,073,000 of net cash payments, the issuance of $35,530,000 in notes payable and the assumption of $2,336,000 of liabilities. All of these acquisitions operate in the insurance intermediary business and were acquired primarily to expand the Company’s core businesses and to attract high-quality individuals to the Company. Acquisition purchase prices are typically based on a multiple of operating profit earned over a one- to three-year period after the acquisition effective date, within a minimum and maximum price range. The initial asset allocation of an acquisition is based on the minimum purchase price and any subsequent “earn-out” payment is allocated primarily to goodwill. All of these acquisitions have been accounted for as business combinations and are as follows (in thousands):
 
6


 
 
Name of Acquisitions
 
 
Business
Segment
 
2005
Date of
Acquisition
 
 
Net
Cash Paid
 
 
Notes
Payable
 
 
Recorded
Purchase Price
 
American Specialty, Inc., et al.
  
National Programs
  
January 1
 
$
23,769
 
$
-
 
$
23,769
 
Braishfield Associates, Inc.
  
Brokerage
  
January 1
  
10,210
  
-
  
10,210
 
Hull & Company, Inc., et al.
  
Brokerage
  
March 1
  
140,026
  
35,000
  
175,026
 
Others
  
Various
  
Various
  
24,068
  
530
  
24,598
 
Total
     
$
198,073
 
$
35,530
 
$
233,603
 
 
The following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the aggregate purchase price to the fair values of the aggregate assets and liabilities acquired (in thousands):
 
  
American Specialty
 
Braishfield
 
Hull
 
Others
 
Total
 
Other current assets
 
$
80
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
$
80
 
Fixed assets
  
370
  
25
  
2,500
  
103
  
2,998
 
Purchased customer accounts
  
7,409
  
4,320
  
66,343
  
8,450
  
86,522
 
Noncompete agreements
  
38
  
50
  
95
  
358
  
541
 
Goodwill
  
18,208
  
5,815
  
106,088
  
15,687
  
145,798
 
Total assets acquired
  
26,105
  
10,210
  
175,026
  
24,598
  
235,939
 
                 
Other liabilities
  
(2,336
)
 
-
  
-
  
-
  
(2,336
)
Total liabilities assumed
  
(2,336
)
 
-
  
-
  
-
  
(2,336
)
                 
Net assets acquired
 
$
23,769
 
$
10,210
 
$
175,026
 
$
24,598
 
$
233,603
 
   
      The weighted average useful lives for the above acquired amortizable intangible assets are as follows: purchased customer accounts, 15.0 years, and noncompete agreements, five years.

      Goodwill of $145,798,000, all of which is expected to be deductible for tax purposes, was assigned to the Retail, National Programs and Brokerage Divisions in the amounts of $8,278,000, $18,708,000 and $118,812,000, respectively.
 
       The results of operations for the acquisitions completed during the first two quarters of 2005 have been combined with those of the Company since their respective acquisition dates. If the acquisitions had occurred as of January 1, 2004, the Company’s results of operations would be as shown in the following table (in thousands, except per share data):
 
  
For the three months
ended June 30,
 
For the six months
ended June 30,
 
 
 
 2005
 
 2004
 
 2005
 
 2004
 
          
Total revenues
 
$
196,170
 
$
184,762
 
$
410,003
 
$
375,212
 
              
Income before income taxes
  
60,544
  
61,303
  
134,995
  
128,819
 
              
Net income
  
37,080
  
37,524
  
82,504
  
78,865
 
              
Net income per share:
             
Basic
 
$
0.54
 
$
0.55
 
$
1.19
 
$
1.15
 
Diluted
 
$
0.53
 
$
0.54
 
$
1.18
 
$
1.14
 
 
These pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations that would have occurred had the acquisitions actually been made at the beginning of the respective periods.
 
 
7

       
          Additional consideration paid to sellers or consideration returned to the Company by sellers as a result of purchase price “earn-out” provisions is recorded primarily as an adjustment to goodwill when the contingencies are settled. The net additional consideration paid by the Company in 2005 as a result of such adjustments totaled $17,065,000, of which $17,290,000 was allocated to goodwill and $225,000 was recorded as net liabilities. Of the $17,065,000 net additional consideration paid, $17,082,000 was paid in cash and $17,000 was recorded as  forgiveness of a note payable obligation. As of June 30, 2005, the maximum future contingency payments related to acquisitions totaled $197,611,000, of which $113,103,000 could be earned within one year.
 
Note 5 - Goodwill and Amortizable Intangible Assets
 
          The Company accounts for goodwill under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”.  SFAS No. 142 provides for the non-amortization of goodwill.  Goodwill is now subject to at least an annual assessment for impairment by applying a fair value-based test.  Amortizable intangible assets (other than indefinite life assets) will be amortized over their useful lives and will be subject to a lower-of-cost-or-market impairment testing. 
 
          SFAS No. 142 requires the Company to compare the fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying amount to determine if there is potential impairment of goodwill.  If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an impairment loss would be recorded to the extent that the fair value of the goodwill within the reporting unit is less than its carrying value.  Fair value is estimated based on multiples of revenues, earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), and pre-tax income. The Company completed its most recent annual assessment as of November 30, 2004 and identified no impairment as a result of the evaluation.
 
          The changes in goodwill, by business segment, for the six months ended June 30, 2005 are as follows (in thousands):
 
  
 
 
National 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Retail  
 
Programs
 
Brokerage
 
Services
 
Total    
 
            
Balance as of December 31, 2004
 
$
259,290
 
$
84,737
 
$
16,760
 
$
56
 
$
360,843
 
                 
Goodwill of acquired businesses
  
18,385
  
25,897
  
118,806
  
-
  
163,088
 
                 
Goodwill disposed of relating to sales
                
of businesses
  
(321
)
 
-
  
-
  
-
  
(321
)
                 
Balance as of June 30, 2005
 
$
277,354
 
$
110,634
 
$
135,566
 
$
56
 
$
523,610
 
 
 
  Amortizable intangible assets as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 consisted of the following (in thousands):
 
 
  
June 30, 2005
 
December 31, 2004
 
        
Weighted
       
Weighted
 
  
Gross
   
Net
 
Average
 
Gross
   
Net
 
Average
 
  
Carrying
 
Accumulated
 
Carrying
 
Life
 
Carrying
 
Accumulated
 
Carrying
 
Life
 
  
Value
 
Amortization
 
Value
 
(Yrs)
 
Value
 
Amortization
 
Value
 
(Yrs)
 
Purchased
 
 
 
 
 
 
           
 Customer
                 
 Accounts
 
$
467,632
 
$
(110,618
)
$
357,014
  
14.9
 
$
381,744
 
$
(96,342
)
$
285,402
  
14.8
 
                          
Noncompete
                         
Agreements
  
33,534
  
(27,005
)
 
6,529
  
7.1
  
32,996
  
(25,389
)
 
7,607
  
7.1
 
                          
Total
 
$
501,166
 
$
(137,623
)
$
363,543
    
$
414,740
 
$
(121,731
)
$
293,009
    
 
 
Amortization expense for amortizable intangible assets for the years ending December 31, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 are estimated to be $32.6 million, $32.1 million, $31.6 million, $30.8 million, and $30.3 million, respectively.
 
 
8

     
Note 6 - Long-Term Debt
 
          In July 2004, the Company completed a private placement of $200.0 million of unsecured senior notes (the "Notes"). The $200.0 million is divided into two series: Series A, for $100.0 million, due in 2011 and bearing interest at 5.57% per year; and Series B, for $100.0 million, due in 2014 and bearing interest at 6.08% per year. The closing on the Series B Notes occurred on July 15, 2004.  The closing on the Series A Notes occurred on September 15, 2004.  The Company has used, and anticipates continuing to use, the proceeds from the Notes for general corporate purposes, including acquisitions and repayment of existing debt. As of June 30, 2005, there was an outstanding balance of $200.0 million on the Notes.
 
          In September 2003, the Company established an unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) with a national banking institution that provided for available borrowings of up to $75.0 million, with a maturity date of October 2008, bearing an interest rate based upon the 30-, 60- or 90-day London Interbank Offering Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 0.625% to 1.625%, depending upon the Company’s quarterly ratio of funded debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and non-cash stock grant compensation.  A commitment fee of 0.175% to 0.375% per annum is assessed on the unused balance. The 90-day LIBOR was 3.49% as of June 30, 2005. As of June 30, 2005, there were no borrowings against the Revolving Credit Facility.
 
          In January 2001, the Company entered into a $90.0 million unsecured seven-year term loan agreement (the “Term Loan”) with a national banking institution, bearing an interest rate based upon the 30-, 60- or 90-day LIBOR plus 0.50% to 1.00%, depending upon the Company’s quarterly ratio of funded debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and non-cash stock grant compensation.  The 90-day LIBOR was 3.49% as of June 30, 2005.  The Term Loan was fully funded on January 3, 2001 and as of June 30, 2005 had an outstanding balance of $32.1 million.  This Term Loan is to be repaid in equal quarterly installments of $3.2 million through December 2007.
 
          To hedge the risk of increasing interest rates from January 2, 2002 through the then remaining six years of the Term Loan, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively converted the floating LIBOR-based interest payments to fixed interest rate payments at 4.53%.  This agreement did not affect the required 0.50% to 1.00% credit risk spread portion of the Term Loan.  In accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, as amended, the Company recorded a liability as of June 30, 2005 for the fair value of the interest rate swap of approximately $169,000, net of income taxes of approximately $108,000, with the related change in fair value reflected as other comprehensive income. As of December 31, 2004, the Company recorded a liability for the fair value of the interest rate swap of approximately $455,000, net of income taxes of approximately $267,000. The Company has designated and assessed the derivative as a highly effective cash flow hedge.
 
          All three of these credit agreements require the Company to maintain certain financial ratios and comply with certain other covenants. The Company was in compliance with all such covenants as of June 30, 2005.
 
          Acquisition and other notes payable as of June 30, 2005 were $37.8 million, which primarily represent debt incurred relative to former owners of certain agencies or customer accounts acquired by the Company.  These notes are payable in monthly, quarterly or annual installments through July 2014, including interest ranging from 1.51% to 8.05%.
 
Note 7 - Legal and Regulatory Proceedings
 
In Item 3 of Part I of Brown & Brown, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ending December 31, 2004 as updated by Item I of Part II of Brown & Brown, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005, certain information concerning certain legal proceedings and other matters was disclosed. Such information was current as of the respective dates of such filings. Additional relevant information is set forth below.
 
Policyholder Actions and Related Matters  
 
As previously disclosed, the Company is a defendant in the putative class action lawsuits styled OptiCare Health Systems, Inc. v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., et al.,Stephen Lewis v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.,et al., and Diane Preuss  v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., et al., (together, the “Policyholder Actions”) all of which were transferred by the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation to the District of New Jersey to be coordinated in a single jurisdiction for pre-trial purposes.
 
9

 
As previously disclosed, governmental entities in a number of states are looking into issues related to the insurance industry’s compensation practices, and the Company and certain subsidiaries of the Company (collectively, “Brown & Brown”) have received and responded to requests for information from some of them.  No state agency has specifically charged or alleged any wrongdoing or violation of state law by Brown & Brown in connection with these inquiries.
 
As previously disclosed, a demand letter from counsel purporting to represent a current shareholder of the Company and seeking the commencement of a derivative suit by the Company against the Board of Directors and certain current and former officers and directors of Brown & Brown, Inc. for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty related to Brown & Brown’s participation in contingent commission agreements (the “Demand Letter”) was received by the Company’s Board of Directors in December 2004. The Special Review Committee (the “Committee”), comprised of independent members of the Company’s Board of Directors, was subsequently established to investigate and reach a determination concerning the merits of the proposed derivative action. The Committee retained independent counsel to assist it in this endeavor. In July 2005, the Committee communicated to the Company and to the attorney who sent the Demand Letter its determination that maintenance of the proposed derivative suit is not in the best interests of the Company.  To date, no further communication has been received from the attorney who sent the Demand Letter.
 
As previously disclosed, “Brown & Brown” has contingent commission agreements with certain underwriters, including revenue-sharing commissions paid by insurance underwriters based primarily on the overall profitability of the aggregate business written with that underwriter, and/or additional factors such as retention ratios and overallvolume of business placed with the underwriter. To a lesser extent, Brown & Brown has some override commission agreements, which allow for commissions to be paid by insurance underwriters in excess of the standard commission rate in specific lines of business, such as group health business.  Brown & Brown has not chosen to discontinue receiving contingent commissions.  
 
Brown & Brown cannot currently predict the impact or resolution of these matters or reasonably estimate a range of possible loss, which could be material. The resolution of these matters may harm Brown & Brown’s business and/or lead to a decrease in or elimination of contingent commissions and override commissions, which could have a material adverse impact on Brown & Brown’s consolidated financial condition.
 
Other
 
Brown & Brown is involved in numerous pending or threatened proceedings by or against Brown & Brown that arise incident to the nature of its business. The damages that may be claimed in these various proceedings are substantial, including in many instances claims for punitive or extraordinary damages. Some of these claims and lawsuits have been resolved, others are in the process of being resolved, and others are still in the investigation or discovery phase. Brown & Brown will continue to respond appropriately to these claims and lawsuits, and to vigorously protect its interests.
 
               Although the ultimate outcome of the matters referenced in this section titled “Other” cannot be ascertained and liabilities in indeterminate amounts may be imposed on Brown & Brown or its subsidiaries, on the basis of present information, availability of insurance coverages and legal advice received, it is the opinion of management that the disposition or ultimate determination of such claims will not have a material adverse effect on Brown & Brown’s consolidated financial position. However, as (i) one or more of Brown & Brown’s insurance carriers could take the position that portions of these claims are not covered by Brown & Brown’s insurance, (ii) to the extent that payments are made to resolve claims and lawsuits, applicable insurance policy limits are eroded, and (iii) the claims and lawsuits relating to these matters are continuing to develop, it is possible that future results of operations or cash flows for any particular quarterly or annual period could be materially affected by unfavorable resolutions of these matters.
 
10

 
Note 8 - Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
 
  
For the six months
ended June 30,
 
  
2005
 
2004
 
Cash paid during the period for (in thousands):
 
 
 
 
 
      
Interest
 
$
6,884
 
$
1,477
 
        
Income taxes
 
$
50,986
 
$
40,385
 
 
The Company’s significant non-cash investing and financing activities are as follows (in thousands):

 
 
For the six months
ended June 30,
 
  
2005
 
2004
 
  
 
 
 
 
Net unrealized holding (loss) on available-for-sale securities,
     
net of income tax benefit of $388 in 2005 and $25 in 2004
 
$
(1,000
)
$
(157
)
 
      
Net gain on cash-flow hedging derivative, net of income tax
       
effect of $159 in 2005 and $404 in 2004
  
286
  
675
 
        
Notes payable issued or assumed for purchased customer accounts
  
35,530
  
1,868
 
        
Notes received on sale of fixed assets and customer accounts
  
1,842
  
4,638
 
        
Common stock issued for acquisitions accounted for under the
       
purchase method of accounting
  
-
  
6,244
 
 
Note 9 - Comprehensive Income
 
The components of comprehensive income, net of related income tax effects, are as follows (in thousands):
 
 
 
For the three months
ended June 30,
 
For the six months
ended June 30,
 
 
 
2005
 
2004
 
2005
 
2004
 
          
Net income
 
$
37,033
 
$
32,153
 
$
80,051
 
$
68,501
 
              
Net unrealized holding (loss) gain on
             
available-for-sale securities
  
(216
)
 
858
  
(1,000
)
 
(157
)
              
Net (loss) gain on cash-flow hedging derivative
  
(14
)
 
742
  
286
  
675
 
              
Comprehensive income
 
$
36,803
 
$
33,753
 
$
79,337
 
$
69,019
 
 
Note 10 - Segment Information
 
The Company’s business is divided into four reportable segments:  the Retail Division, which provides a broad range of insurance products and services to commercial, public entity, professional and individual customers; the National Programs Division, which is comprised of two units - Professional Programs, which provides professional liability and related package products for certain professionals, delivered through nationwide networks of independent agents, and Special Programs, which markets targeted products and services designated for specific industries, trade groups, governmental entities and market niches; the Brokerage Division, which markets and sells excess and surplus commercial insurance and reinsurance, primarily through independent agents and brokers; and the Services Division, which provides insurance-related services including third-party administration, consulting for the workers’ compensation and employee benefit self-insurance markets, and managed healthcare services. The Company conducts all of its operations within the United States of America. 
 
11

 
Summarized financial information concerning the Company’s reportable segments for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 are shown in the following table.  The “Other” column includes any income and expenses not allocated to reportable segments and corporate-related items, including the inter-company interest expense charge to the reporting segment (in thousands).
 
 
 
Retail
 
NationalPrograms
 
Brokerage
 
Service
 
Other
 
Total
 
2005
             
Total revenues
 
$
257,958
 
$
63,510
 
$
59,250
 
$
13,838
 
$
3,749
 
$
398,305
 
                    
Investment income
  
42
  
171
  
383
  
-
  
1,893
  
2,489
 
Amortization
  
9,539
  
3,996
  
2,306
  
22
  
29
  
15,892
 
Depreciation
  
2,819
  
968
  
540
  
220
  
347
  
4,894
 
Interest expense
  
10,598
  
5,183
  
5,355
  
2
  
(13,885
)
 
7,253
 
Income before income taxes
  
73,490
  
16,235
  
15,375
  
3,851
  
22,030
  
130,981
 
                    
Total assets
  
903,721
  
407,058
  
452,372
  
15,061
  
(310,776
)
 
1,467,436
 
Capital expenditures
  
3,732
  
2,131
  
836
  
202
  
309
  
7,210
 
 
  
Retail
 
NationalPrograms
 
Brokerage
 
Service
 
Other
 
Total
 
2004
             
Total revenues
 
$
240,978
 
$
47,356
 
$
20,476
 
$
14,297
 
$
400
 
$
323,507
 
                    
Investment income
  
535
  
41
  
-
  
-
  
445
  
1,021
 
Amortization
  
7,229
  
2,732
  
242
  
19
  
78
  
10,300
 
Depreciation
  
2,929
  
748
  
245
  
170
  
331
  
4,423
 
Interest expense
  
10,305
  
3,968
  
430
  
67
  
(13,316
)
 
1,454
 
Income before income taxes
  
67,772
  
12,683
  
7,243
  
3,439
  
20,752
  
111,889
 
                    
Total assets
  
787,390
  
324,545
  
82,573
  
14,940
  
(215,349
)
 
994,099
 
Capital expenditures
  
3,071
  
671
  
223
  
396
  
203
  
4,564
 
 
 
12

 
ITEM 2:
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (MD&A)
 
THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION UPDATES THE MD&A CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY’S 2004 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K, AND THE TWO DISCUSSIONS SHOULD BE READ TOGETHER.
 
General

We are an insurance intermediary organization with origins dating from 1939 and are headquartered in Daytona Beach and Tampa, Florida. We market and sell to our customers insurance products and services, primarily in the property, casualty and the employee benefits markets. In our capacity as an agent and broker, we do not assume underwriting risks. Instead, we provide our customers with quality insurance contracts, as well as other targeted, customized risk management products and services.

We are compensated for our services primarily by commissions paid by insurance companies and fees paid by customers for certain services. The commission income that we receive is usually a percentage of the premium paid by the insured. Commission rates generally depend upon the type of insurance, the particular insurance company and the nature of the services provided by us. In some cases, a commission is shared with other agents or brokers who have acted jointly with us in a transaction. We may also receive “contingent commissions” which are revenue-sharing commissions paid by insurance companies based primarily on the overall profitability of the aggregate business written with such company, and/or additional factors such as retention ratios and overall volume of business that we place with such insurance companies during the prior year.
 
13


The Insurance Market

Premium rates are established by insurance companies based upon many factors, including reinsurance rates, none of which we control. Beginning in 1986 and continuing through 1999, commission revenues were adversely influenced by a consistent decline in premium rates resulting from intense competition among property and casualty companies for market share. Among other factors, this condition of a prevailing decline in premium rates, commonly referred to as a "soft market," generally resulted in flat to reduced commissions on renewal business. The effect of this softness in rates was somewhat offset by our substantial merger and acquisition activity and net new business production. As a result of increasing loss ratios (the comparison of incurred losses plus loss adjustment expenses against earned premium) of insurance companies through 1999, there was a general increase in premium rates commencing in the first quarter of 2000 and continuing into the first half of 2003. Starting in the second half of 2003, as insurance companies began to experience improved loss ratios, they again became more competitive on selected risks, resulting in a moderation of premium rate increases, and in some cases reductions in premium rates. We expect the softening of insurance premium rates throughout most of the United States will continue through 2005.
 
Critical Accounting Policies
 
The more critical accounting and reporting policies include our accounting for revenue recognition, business acquisitions and purchase price allocations, intangible assets impairments, reserves for litigation and derivative interests.  In particular, the accounting for these areas requires significant judgments to be made by management.  Different assumptions in the application of these policies could result in material changes in our consolidated financial position or consolidated results of operations.  Refer to Note 1 in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission for details regarding all of our critical and significant accounting policies.
 
Results of Operations
 
The condensed consolidated financial information relating to the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 is as follows (in thousands, except percentages):
 
 
 
For the three months 
ended June 30,
 
For the six months
ended June 30,
 
  
2005
 
 
2004
 
%
Change
 
 
 2005
 
 
 2004
 
%
Change
 
REVENUES
             
Commissions and fees
 
$
188,736
 
$
153,227
  
23.2
%   
$
361,207
 
$
291,765
  
23.8
%
Contingent commissions
  
4,002
  
3,522
  
13.6
%
 
31,846
  
29,298
  
8.7
%
Investment income
  
1,524
  
333
  
357.7
%
 
2,489
  
1,021
  
143.8
%
Other income, net
  
1,669
  
860
  
94.1
%
 
2,763
  
1,423
  
94.2
%
Total revenues
  
195,931
  
157,942
  
24.1
%
 
398,305
  
323,507
  
23.1
%
 
                   
EXPENSES
                   
Employee compensation and benefits
  
94,100
  
76,270
  
23.4
%
 
184,484
  
152,552
  
20.9
%
Non-cash stock grant compensation
  
788
  
665
  
18.5
%
 
1,679
  
1,510
  
11.2
%
Other operating expenses
  
25,980
  
19,983
  
30.0
%
 
53,122
  
41,379
  
28.4
%
Amortization
  
8,357
  
5,483
  
52.4
%
 
15,892
  
10,300
  
54.3
%
Depreciation
  
2,527
  
2,269
  
11.4
%
 
4,894
  
4,423
  
10.6
%
Interest
  
3,711
  
743
  
399.5
%
 
7,253
  
1,454
  
398.8
%
Total expenses
  
135,463
  
105,413
  
28.5
%
 
267,324
  
211,618
  
26.3
%
 
                   
Income before income taxes
  
60,468
  
52,529
  
15.1
%
 
130,981
  
111,889
  
17.1
%
 
                   
Income taxes
  
23,435
  
20,376
  
15.0
%
 
50,930
  
43,388
  
17.4
%
 
                   
NET INCOME
 
$
37,033
 
$
32,153
  
15.2
%
$
80,051
 
$
68,501
  
16.9
%
 
Net Income.  Net income for the second quarter of 2005 was $37.0 million, or $0.53 per diluted share, compared with net income in the second quarter of 2004 of $32.2 million, or $0.46 per diluted share, a 15.2% increase on a per-share basis.  Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $80.1 million or $1.15 per diluted share, compared with net income for the comparable period in 2004 of $68.5 million, or $0.99 per diluted share, a 16.2% increase on a per-share basis.
 
14

 
Commissions & Fees. Commissions and fees, including contingent commissions, for the second quarter of 2005 increased $36.0 million, or 23.0%, over the same period in 2004. Contingent commissions for the second quarter of 2005 increased $0.5 million over the second quarter of 2004, to $4.0 million. Core commissions and fees are our commissions and fees, less (i) contingent commissions and (ii) divested business (commissions and fees generated from offices, books of business or niches sold or terminated). Core commissions and fees revenue for the second quarter of 2005 increased $37.6 million, of which approximately $34.3 million represents core commissions and fees from agencies acquired since the second quarter of 2004. After divested business of $2.1 million, the remaining $3.3 million represents net new business production, which reflects a 2.2% internal growth rate for core commissions and fees. Commissions and fees for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased $72.0 million, or 22.4%, over the same period in 2004. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, contingent commissions increased $2.5 million over the comparable period in 2004. Core commissions and fees revenue for the first six months of 2005 increased $74.0 million, of which approximately $65.9 million of the total increase represents core commissions and fees from agencies acquired since the comparable period in 2004. After divested business of $4.6 million, the remaining $8.1 million represents net new business production, which reflects a 2.8% internal growth rate for core commissions and fees.
 
Contingent commissions in the insurance industry have recently come under scrutiny. Various governmental entities are reviewing such commission arrangements, and lawsuits seeking class action status have been filed against various insurance intermediaries and companies that relate in part to such commissions. Some of the largest brokers in the world have announced that they will no longer accept contingent commissions, and certain insurance companies have said that they are going to discontinue paying contingent commissions or are reviewing the issue. We have not chosen to discontinue receiving contingent commissions. An elimination or significant decrease in the payment of contingent commissions to us could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations. See "Recent Industry Developments" below for additional information.
 
Investment Income. Investment income for the three months ended June 30, 2005 increased $1.2 million, or 357.7%, over the same period in 2004. Investment income for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased $1.5 million, or 143.8%, over the same period in 2004. These increases in investment income were primarily due to higher available invested cash and an increase in interest rates.
 
Other Income, Net.  Other income for the three months ended June 30, 2005 increased $0.8 million, or 94.1%, over the same period in 2004. Other income for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased $1.3 million, or 94.2%, over the same period in 2004. Other income consists primarily of gains and losses from the sale and disposition of assets. The majority of this gain for the second quarter of 2005 was the result of the completion of the one year earn-out from the sale of our medical services operation in Louisiana in June 2004.
 
Employee Compensation and Benefits. Employee compensation and benefits for the second quarter of 2005 increased $17.8 million, or 23.4%, over the same period in 2004. Employee compensation and benefits for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased $31.9 million, or 20.9%, over the same period in 2004. These increases are primarily related to the addition of new employees from acquisitions completed since July 1, 2004 and increased compensation that resulted from higher commissions and fees revenue. Employee compensation and benefits as a percentage of total revenue decreased to 48.0% for the second quarter of 2005, from 48.3% for the second quarter of 2004. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, employee compensation and benefits as a percentage of total revenue decreased to 46.3%, from 47.2% for the same period in 2004. These improved ratios for the three and six month periods was the result of the continued assimilation of the acquisitions completed in 2004 and 2005 into our standard compensation program.
 
Non-Cash Stock Grant Compensation. Non-cash stock grant compensation expense represents the expense required to be recorded under Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, relating to our Stock Performance Plan. The annual cost of this Stock Performance Plan increases only when granted shares become “awarded”, which occurs when our average stock price over a 20 trading-day period increases by increments of 20% or more over the price at the time of the original grant. Non-cash stock grant compensation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2005 increased $0.1 million, or 18.5%, over the same period in 2004. Non-cash stock grant compensation for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased $0.2 million, or 11.2%, over the same period in 2004. These increases are primarily the result of more shares being awarded and therefore becoming outstanding during 2005 than were outstanding during 2004.
 
15

 
Other Operating Expenses. Other operating expenses for the second quarter of 2005 increased $6.0 million, or 30.0%, over the same period in 2004. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, other operating expenses increased $11.7 million, or 28.4%, over the same period in 2004. These increases are primarily the result of acquisitions completed since the third quarter of 2004 that had no comparable results in the same period of 2004. Other operating expenses as a percentage of revenues for the second quarter of 2005 increased to 13.3%, compared with 12.7% for the same period in 2004. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, other operating expenses as a percentage of revenues increased to 13.3%, compared with 12.8% for the same period in 2004. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, there was a general increase in travel and entertainment expenses, and a significant increase in legal professional fees of approximately $1.0 million per quarter.
 
Amortization. Amortization expense for the second quarter of 2005 increased $2.9 million, or 52.4%, over the second quarter of 2004. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, amortization expense increased $5.6 million, or 54.3%, over the same period in 2004. These increases are primarily due to acquisitions completed since July 1, 2004, and the change in the amortization period for purchased customer accounts to 15 years from 20 years that was implemented in November 2004.
 
Depreciation. Depreciation expense for the second quarter of 2005 increased $0.3 million, or 11.4%, over the second quarter of 2004. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, depreciation expense increased $0.5 million, or 10.6%, over the same period in 2004. These increases are due to capital expenditures and fixed assets purchased in acquisitions completed since July 1, 2004.
 
Interest Expense. Interest expense for the second quarter of 2005 increased $3.0 million, or 399.5%, over the same period in 2004. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, interest expense increased $5.8 million, or 398.8%, over the same period in 2004. These increases are primarily the result of additional interest expense relating to the funding of the $200.0 million of unsecured senior notes (as discussed in Note 6 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements) in July and September of 2004.
 
Segment Information
 
          As discussed in Note 10 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, we operate in four reportable segments: the Retail, National Programs, Brokerage and Services Divisions.   Our core commissions and fees internal growth rates for the three months ended June 30, 2005 by divisional segment are as follows:

  
For the three months
 
Total
 
Total
  
Less
 
Internal
 
  
ended June 30,
 
Net
 
Net
  
Acquisition
 
Net
 
  
2005
 
2004
 
Change
 
Growth %
  
Revenues
 
Growth %
 
               
Florida Retail
 
$
40,989
 
$
35,928
 
$
5,061
  
14.1
%   
 
$
1,827
  
9.0
%
National Retail
  
51,541
  
47,225
  
4,316
  
9.1
%
  
4,452
  
(0.3
)%
Western Retail
  
25,830
  
28,802
  
(2,972
)
 
(10.3
)%
  
113
  
(10.7
)%
Total Retail(1)
  
118,360
  
111,955
  
6,405
  
5.7
%
  
6,392
  
0.0
%
                     
Professional Programs
  
9,515
  
10,087
  
(572
)
 
(5.7
)%
  
-
  
(5.7
)%
Special Programs
  
20,335
  
14,659
  
5,676
  
38.7
%
  
3,768
  
13.0
%
Total National Programs
  
29,850
  
24,746
  
5,104
  
20.6
%
  
3,768
  
5.4
%
                     
Brokerage
  
34,077
  
8,322
  
25,755
  
309.5
%
  
24,117
  
19.7
%
                     
Services
  
6,449
  
6,086
  
363
  
6.0
%
  
-
  
6.0
%
                     
Total Core Commissions and Fees
 
$
188,736
 
$
151,109
 
$
37,627
  
24.9
%
 
$
34,277
  
2.2
%
 
 
(1)  
The Retail segment includes commissions and fees reported in the “Other” column of the Segment Information in Note 10 which includes corporateand consolidation items.
 

16

       
      The reconciliation of the above internal growth schedule to the total Commissions and Fees included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 is as follows:
   
 
 
For the three months
ended June 30,
 
  
2005
 
2004
      
Total core commissions and fees
 
$
188,736
 
$
151,109
 
Contingent commissions
  
4,002
  
3,522
 
Divested business
  
-
  
2,118
 
 
       
Total commission & fees
 
$
192,738
 
$
156,749
 
 
          Our core commissions and fees internal growth rates for the six months ended June 30, 2005 by divisional segment are as following: 
 
  
For the six months
 
Total
 
Total
 
Less
 
Internal
 
  
ended June 30,
 
Net
 
Net
 
Acquisition
 
Net
 
  
2005
 
2004
 
Change
 
Growth %
 
Revenues
 
Growth %
 
              
Florida Retail
 
$
78,193
 
$
69,802
 
$
8,391
  
12.0
%
$
2,874
  
7.9
%
National Retail
  
102,017
  
87,323
  
14,694
  
16.8
%
 
14,739
  
(0.1
)%
Western Retail
  
51,182
  
54,430
  
(3,248
)
 
(6.0
)%
 
970
  
(7.7
)%
Total Retail(1)
  
231,392
  
211,555
  
19,837
  
9.4
%
 
18,583
  
0.6
%
                    
Professional Programs
  
20,343
  
20,404
  
(61
)
 
(0.3
)%
 
715
  
(3.8
)%
Special Programs
  
41,195
  
26,440
  
14,755
  
55.8
%
 
11,088
  
13.9
%
Total National Programs
  
61,538
  
46,844
  
14,694
  
31.4
%
 
11,803
  
6.2
%
                    
Brokerage
  
55,444
  
16,992
  
38,452
  
226.3
%
 
35,472
  
17.5
%
                    
Services
  
12,833
  
11,823
  
1,010
  
8.5
%
 
-
  
8.5
%
                    
Total Core Commissions and Fees
 
$
361,207
 
$
287,214
 
$
73,993
  
25.8
%
$
65,858
  
2.8
%
 
(1)  
The Retail segment includes commissions and fees reported in the “Other” column of the Segment Information in Note 10 which includes the corporate and consolidation items.
 
         The reconciliation of the above internal growth schedule to the total Commissions and Fees included in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 is as follows:
   
 
 
For the six months
ended June 30,
 
  
2005
 
2004
 
      
Total core commissions and fees
 
$
361,207
 
$
287,214
 
Contingent commissions
  
31,846
  
29,298
 
Divested business
  
-
  
4,551
 
 
       
Total commission & fees
 
$
393,053
 
$
321,063
 
 
17


Retail
 
          The Retail Division provides a broad range of insurance products and services to commercial, public entity, professional and individual customers. Financial information relating to our Retail Division is as follows (in thousands, except percentages):
   
 
 
For the three months
ended June 30,
 
For the six months
ended June 30,
 
  
2005
 
 2004
 
%
 Change
 
2005
 
 2004
 
%
 Change
 
REVENUES
             
Commissions and fees
 
$
117,610
 
$
112,907
  
4.2
%   
$
229,825
 
$
214,532
  
7.1
%
Contingent commissions
  
2,440
  
3,172
  
(23.1
)%
 
26,802
  
25,422
  
5.4
%
Investment income
  
19
  
14
  
35.7
%
 
42
  
535
  
(92.1
)%
Other income (loss), net
  
568
  
(141
)
 
NMF
  
1,289
  
489
  
163.6
%
  Total revenues
  
120,637
  
115,952
  
4.0
%
 
257,958
  
240,978
  
7.0
%
 
                   
EXPENSES
                   
Employee compensation and benefits
  
58,496
  
57,731
  
1.3
%
 
119,247
  
113,870
  
4.7
%
Non-cash stock grant compensation
  
552
  
400
  
38.0
%
 
1,099
  
800
  
37.4
%
Other operating expenses
  
20,101
  
19,281
  
4.3
%
 
41,166
  
38,073
  
8.1
%
Amortization
  
4,816
  
3,797
  
26.8
%
 
9,539
  
7,229
  
32.0
%
Depreciation
  
1,403
  
1,495
  
(6.2
)%
 
2,819
  
2,929
  
(3.8
)%
Interest
  
5,224
  
5,491
  
(4.9
)%
 
10,598
  
10,305
  
2.8
%
Total expenses
  
90,592
  
88,195
  
2.7
%
 
184,468
  
173,206
  
6.5
%
 
                   
Income before income taxes
 
$
30,045
 
$
27,757
  
8.2
%
$
73,490
 
$
67,772
  
8.4
%
                    
Net internal growth rate - core commissions and fees
  
0.0
%
 
3.9
%
    
0.6
%
 
3.4
%
   
 
                   
Employee compensation and benefits ratio
  
48.5
%
 
49.8
%
    
46.2
%
 
47.3
%
   
                    
Other operating expenses ratio
  
16.7
%
 
16.6
%
    
16.0
%
 
15.8
%
   
 
                   
Capital expenditures
 
$
1,557
 
$
1,279
    
$
3,732
 
$
3,071
    
 
                   
Total assets at June 30, 2005 and 2004
        
$
903,721
 
$
787,390
    
 
         The Retail Division’s total revenues during the three months ended June 30, 2005 increased 4.0%, or $4.7 million, to $120.6 million. Contingent commissions for the quarter decreased $0.7 million over the second quarter of 2004. Of the increase in revenues, approximately $6.4 million related to the core commissions and fees from acquisitions that had no comparable revenues in the same period of 2004. Commissions and fees recorded in the second quarter of 2004 from business divested during 2005 was $1.4 million. The Retail Division’s internal growth rate for core commissions and fees was nil for the second quarter of 2005, which was primarily due to the softening and compression of insurance premium rates in virtually all parts of the country. In some regions, such as Florida, this decline in rates is being slightly offset by an increase in business exposure units, created by an improving economy. Income before income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2005 increased 8.2%, or $2.3 million, to $30.0 million. This increase is primarily due to the earnings from acquisitions.
 
The Retail Division’s total revenues during the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased 7.0%, or $17.0 million, to $258.0 million. Contingent commissions for the six months ended June 30, 2005, increased $1.4 million, over the same period in 2004. Of the increase in revenues, approximately $18.6 million related to the core commissions and fees from acquisitions that had no comparable revenues in the same period of 2004. Commissions and fees recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2004 from business divested during 2005 was $3.2 million.  The remaining increase is primarily due to net new business growth in core commissions and fees. The Retail Division’s internal growth rate for core commissions and fees was 0.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Income before income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased 8.4%, or $5.7 million, to $73.5 million. This increase is primarily due to the earnings from acquisitions and net new business.
 
18

 
National Programs
 
          The National Programs Division is comprised of two units: Professional Programs, which provides professional liability and related package products for certain professionals delivered through nationwide networks of independent agents; and Special Programs, which markets targeted products and services designated for specific industries, trade groups, public entities and market niches. Financial information relating to our National Programs Division is as follows (in thousands, except percentages):  
       
 
 
For the three months
ended June 30,
 
For the six months
ended June 30,
 
  
2005
 
2004
 
%
Change
 
 2005
 
2004
 
%
Change
 
REVENUES
              
Commissions and fees
 
$
29,850
 
$
24,746
  
20.6
%   
$
61,538
 
$
46,844
  
31.4
%
Contingent commissions
  
486
  
393
  
23.7
%
 
1,634
  
478
  
241.8
%
Investment income
  
96
  
19
  
405.3
%
 
171
  
41
  
317.1
%
Other income (loss), net
  
30
  
(2
)
 
NMF
  
167
  
(7
)
 
NMF
 
Total revenues
  
30,462
  
25,156
  
21.1
%
 
63,510
  
47,356
  
34.1
%
 
                   
EXPENSES
                   
Employee compensation and benefits
  
12,482
  
10,649
  
17.2
%
 
26,457
  
19,708
  
34.2
%
Non-cash stock grant compensation
  
89
  
59
  
50.8
%
 
180
  
117
  
53.8
%
Other operating expenses
  
5,179
  
4,174
  
24.1
%
 
10,491
  
7,400
  
41.8
%
Amortization
  
1,965
  
1,515
  
29.7
%
 
3,996
  
2,732
  
46.3
%
Depreciation
  
497
  
386
  
28.8
%
 
968
  
748
  
29.4
%
Interest
  
2,510
  
2,209
  
13.6
%
 
5,183
  
3,968
  
30.6
%
Total expenses
  
22,722
  
18,992
  
19.6
%
 
47,275
  
34,673
  
36.3
%
 
                   
Income before income taxes
 
$
7,740
 
$
6,164
  
25.6
%
$
16,235
 
$
12,683
  
28.0
%
                    
Net internal growth rate - core commissions and fees
  
5.4
%
 
2.6
%
    
6.2
%
 
1.9
%
   
 
                   
Employee compensation and benefits ratio
  
41.0
%
 
42.3
%
    
41.7
%
 
41.6
%
   
                    
Other operating expenses ratio
  
17.0
%
 
16.6
%
    
16.5
%
 
15.6
%
   
 
                   
Capital expenditures
 
$
1,368
 
$
587
    
$
2,131
 
$
671
    
 
                   
Total assets at June 30, 2005 and 2004
        
$
407,058
 
$
324,545
    
 

Total revenues for National Programs for the three months ended June 30, 2005 increased 21.1%, or $5.3 million, to $30.5 million. Contingent commissions for the second quarter of 2005 increased $0.1 million over the second quarter of 2004. Of the increase in revenues, approximately $3.8 million related to core commissions and fees from acquisitions that had no comparable revenues in the same period of 2004. The remaining increase is primarily due to net new business growth, and therefore, the National Programs Division’s internal growth rate for the core commissions and fees was 5.4%. Although the Professional Programs Division had a decrease of 5.7% in internal growth rate due to the continued softening of professional liability rates, it was offset by a strong 13.0% internal growth rate in our Special Programs Division which was attributable principally to increased premium rates in the condominium program administered by Florida Intracoastal Underwriters Limited Company (“FIU”). Income before income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2005 increased 25.6%, or $1.6 million, to $7.7 million, over the same period in 2004. This increase is primarily due to earnings from acquisitions completed since the third quarter of 2004 and net new business growth.

Total revenues for National Programs for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased 34.1%, or $16.2 million, to $63.5 million. Contingent commissions for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased $1.2 million over the same period in 2004. Of the increase in revenues, approximately $11.8 million related to core commissions and fees from acquisitions that had no comparable revenues in the same period of 2004. The remaining increase is primarily due to net new business growth. Therefore the National Programs Division’s internal growth rate for core commissions and fees was 6.2%. Although the Professional Programs Division had a decrease of 3.8% in internal growth rate due to the continued softening of professional liability rates, it was offset by a strong 13.9% internal growth rate in our Special Programs Division which was attributable principally to increased premium rates in the condominium program administered by FIU and net new business in our public entity business. Income before income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased 28.0%, or $3.6 million, to $16.2 million, over the same period in 2004. This increase is primarily due to net new business growth and earnings from acquisitions completed since the third quarter of 2004.
 
19


Brokerage
 
          The Brokerage Division markets and sells excess and surplus commercial insurance and reinsurance, primarily through independent agents and brokers. Financial information relating to our Brokerage Division is as follows (in thousands, except percentages):
 
 
 
For the three months
ended June 30,
 
For the six months
ended June 30,
 
  
2005
 
2004
 
%
Change
 
2005
 
2004
 
%
Change
 
REVENUES
             
Commissions and fees
 
$
34,077
 
$
8,270
  
312.1
%    
$
55,444
 
$
16,900
  
228.1
%
Contingent commissions
  
1,150
  
123
  
835.0
%
 
3,409
  
3,565
  
(4.4
)%
Investment income
  
368
  
-
  
NMF
  
383
  
-
  
NMF
 
Other income, net
  
6
  
-
  
NMF
  
14
  
11
  
27.3
%
Total revenues
  
35,601
  
8,393
  
324.2
%
 
59,250
  
20,476
  
189.4
%
 
                   
EXPENSES
                   
Employee compensation and benefits
  
16,497
  
4,115
  
300.9
%
 
26,959
  
8,820
  
205.7
%
Non-cash stock grant compensation
  
41
  
25
  
64.0
%
 
82
  
50
  
64.0
%
Other operating expenses
  
5,293
  
1,646
  
221.6
%
 
8,633
  
3,446
  
150.5
%
Amortization
  
1,551
  
122
  
NMF
  
2,306
  
242
  
852.9
%
Depreciation
  
338
  
128
  
164.1
%
 
540
  
245
  
120.4
%
Interest
  
3,566
  
200
  
NMF
  
5,355
  
430
  
NMF
 
Total expenses
  
27,286
  
6,236
  
337.6
%
 
43,875
  
13,233
  
231.6
%
 
                   
Income before income taxes
 
$
8,315
 
$
2,157
  
285.5
%
$
15,375
 
$
7,243
  
112.3
%
                    
Net internal growth rate - core commissions and fees
  
19.7
%
 
16.1
%
    
17.5
%
 
14.4
%
   
 
                   
Employee compensation and benefits ratio
  
46.3
%
 
49.0
%
    
45.5
%
 
43.1
%
   
                    
Other operating expenses ratio
  
14.9
%
 
19.6
%
    
14.6
%
 
16.8
%
   
 
                   
Capital expenditures
 
$
616
 
$
73
    
$
836
 
$
223
    
 
                   
Total assets at June 30, 2005 and 2004
        
$
452,372
 
$
82,573
    
 
         The Brokerage Division’s total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2005 increased 324.2%, or $27.2 million, to $35.6 million over the same period in 2004. Contingent commissions for the second quarter of 2005 increased $1.0 million over the same quarter of 2004. Of the increase in revenues, approximately $24.1 million related to core commissions and fees from acquisitions that had no comparable revenues in the same period of 2004. The substantial increase in revenues from acquisitions was generated primarily from Hull & Company, Inc., which was acquired on March 1, 2005 and has estimated annualized revenues of $63.0 million. Other acquisitions made in the Brokerage Division during the last year include Braishfield Associates, Inc. and ECC Insurance Brokers, LLC, both acquired on January 1, 2005 and International E&S acquired in September 2004. Also as a result of these acquisitions, amortization expense and interest expense increased significantly. The remaining increase is primarily due to net new business growth in core commissions and fees. Income before income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2005 increased 285.5%, or $6.2 million, to $8.3 million over the same period in 2004, primarily due to earnings from acquisitions and net new business.
 
        The Brokerage Division’s total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased 189.4%, or $38.8 million, to $59.3 million over the same period in 2004. Contingent commissions for the six months ended June 30, 2005 decreased $0.2 million from the same period in 2004. Of the increase in revenues, approximately $35.5 million related to core commissions and fees from acquisitions that had no comparable revenues in the same period of 2004, as previously mentioned.  The remaining increase is primarily due to net new business growth in core commissions and fees. Income before income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased 112.3%, or $8.1 million, to $15.4 million over the same period in 2004, primarily due to earnings from acquisitions and net new business.
 
 
20

 
 Services           
 
          The Services Division provides insurance-related services, including third-party administration, consulting for the workers’ compensation and employee benefit self-insurance markets and managed healthcare services. Financial information relating to our Services Division is as follows (in thousands, except percentages):
 
 
 
For the three months
ended June 30,
 
For the six months
ended June 30,
 
  
2005
 
2004
 
%
Change
 
2005
 
2004
 
 %
Change
 
REVENUES
             
Commissions and fees
 
$
6,449
 
$
6,831
  
(5.6
)%   
$
12,833
 
$
13,295
  
(3.5
)%
Contingent commissions
  
-
  
-
  
-
  
-
  
-
  
-
 
Investment income
  
-
  
-
  
-
  
-
  
-
  
-
 
Other income, net
  
1,005
  
1,002
  
0.3
%
 
1,005
  
1,002
  
0.3
%
Total revenues
 
$
7,454
 
$
7,833
  
(4.8
)%
$
13,838
 
$
14,297
  
(3.2
)%
 
                   
EXPENSES
                   
Employee compensation and benefits
  
3,766
  
3,915
  
(3.8
)%
 
7,571
  
7,752
  
(2.3
)%
Non-cash stock grant compensation
  
29
  
27
  
7.4
%
 
60
  
55
  
9.1
%
Other operating expenses
  
1,087
  
1,554
  
(30.1
)%
 
2,112
  
2,795
  
(24.4
)%
Amortization
  
11
  
10
  
10.0
%
 
22
  
19
  
15.8
%
Depreciation
  
114
  
91
  
25.3
%
 
220
  
170
  
29.4
%
Interest
  
1
  
33
  
(97.0
)%
 
2
  
67
  
(97.0
)%
Total expenses
  
5,008
  
5,630
  
(11.0
)%
 
9,987
  
10,858
  
(8.0
)%
 
                   
Income before income taxes
 
$
2,446
 
$
2,203
  
11.0
%
$
3,851
 
$
3,439
  
12.0
%
                    
Net internal growth rate - core commissions and fees
  
6.0
%
 
22.9
%
    
8.5
%
 
17.8
%
   
 
                   
Employee compensation and benefits ratio
  
50.5
%
 
50.0
%
    
54.7
%
 
54.2
%
   
                    
Other operating expenses ratio
  
14.6
%
 
19.8
%
    
15.3
%
 
19.5
%
   
 
                   
Capital expenditures
 
$
118
 
$
280
    
$
202
 
$
396
    
 
                   
Total assets at June 30, 2005 and 2004
        
$
15,061
 
$
14,940
    
      
          The Services Division’s total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2005 decreased 4.8%, or $0.4 million, to $7.5 million from the same period in 2004. On June 30, 2004, we sold our medical services operation in Louisiana. This medical services operation had estimated quarterly revenues of approximately $0.7 million and the sale of this operation resulted in lower quarterly revenues for this Division. Core commissions and fees, which excludes the prior period revenues from this divestiture, reflect an internal growth rate of 6.0% for the second quarter of 2005. Other income primarily represents the gain on the sale of the medical services operation in Louisiana, recognized partly in 2004 based on the minimum purchase price, and the subsequent earn-out gain recognized in June 2005. Income before income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2005 increased 11.0%, or $0.2 million, to $2.4 million from the same period in 2004, primarily as a result of the gain on this divestiture.

          The Services Division’s total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2005 decreased 3.2%, or $0.5 million, to $13.8 million from the same period in 2004. Core commissions and fees, excluding the prior period revenues from the divestiture referred to above, reflect an internal growth rate of 8.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Income before income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased 12.0%, or $0.4 million, to $3.8 million from the same period in 2004, primarily as a result of the gain on this divestiture.
 
21

 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
          Our cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2005 totaled $42.9 million, a decrease of $145.2 million from the $188.1 million balance at December 31, 2004.  For the six-month period ended June 30, 2005, $94.3 million of cash was provided from operating activities. During this period, $215.2 million was used to acquire other agencies and books of business (“customer accounts”), $7.2 million was used for additions to fixed assets, $8.8 million was used for payments on long-term debt, and $11.1 million was used for the payment of dividends.
 
          As of June 30, 2005, our contractual cash obligations were as follows (in thousands):
 
      
Payments Due by Period 
 
Contractual Cash Obligations
 
 
Total 
 
 
Less than 1
 Year 
 
 
1-3 Years 
 
 
4-5 Years 
 
 
After 5
 Years 
 
Long term debt
 
$
269,925
 
$
49,692
 
$
19,800
 
$
294
 
$
200,139
 
Capital lease obligations
  
20
  
7
  
13
  
-
  
-
 
Other long term liabilities
  
9,078
  
6,368
  
945
  
642
  
1,123
 
Operating leases
  
78,780
  
17,881
  
28,240
  
19,277
  
13,382
 
Maximum future acquisition
   contingent payments
  
197,611
  
113,103
  
84,492
  
16
  
-
 
         Total contractual cash obligations
 
$
555,414
 
$
187,051
 
$
133,490
 
$
20,229
 
$
214,644
 
                 
In July 2004, we completed a private placement of $200.0 million of unsecured senior notes (the "Notes"). The $200.0 million is divided into two series: Series A, for $100.0 million, due in 2011 and bearing interest at 5.57% per year; and Series B, for $100.0 million, due in 2014 and bearing interest at 6.08% per year. The closing on the Series B Notes occurred on July 15, 2004.  The closing on the Series A Notes occurred on September 15, 2004.  The Company has used, and anticipates continuing to use, the proceeds from the Notes for general corporate purposes, including repayment of existing debt and acquisitions. As of June 30, 2005 there was an outstanding balance of $200.0 million on the Notes.
 
In September 2003, we established an unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) with a national banking institution that provided for available borrowings of up to $75.0 million, with a maturity date of October 2008, bearing an interest rate based upon the 30-, 60- or 90-day London Interbank Offering Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 0.625% to 1.625%, depending upon our quarterly ratio of funded debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and non-cash stock grant compensation.  A commitment fee of 0.175% to 0.375% per annum is assessed on the unused balance.  As of June 30, 2005, there were no borrowings against this Revolving Credit Facility.
 
In January 2001, we entered into a $90.0 million unsecured seven-year term loan agreement (the “Term Loan”) with a national banking institution, bearing an interest rate based upon the 30-, 60- or 90-day LIBOR plus 0.50% to 1.00%, depending upon our quarterly ratio of funded debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and non-cash stock grant compensation.  The 90-day LIBOR was 3.49% as of June 30, 2005.  The Term Loan was fully funded on January 3, 2001 and as of June 30, 2005 had an outstanding balance of $32.1 million.  This Term Loan is to be repaid in equal quarterly installments of $3.2 million through December 2007.
 
          To hedge the risk of increasing interest rates from January 2, 2002 through the then remaining six years of the Term Loan, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively converted the floating LIBOR-based interest payments to fixed interest payments at an annual rate of 4.53%.  This agreement did not impact or change the required 0.50% to 1.00% credit risk spread portion of the Term Loan.  In accordance with SFAS No. 133, as amended, we recorded a liability as of June 30, 2005 for the fair value of the interest rate swap of approximately $169,000, net of income taxes of approximately $108,000.  We have designated and assessed the derivative as a highly effective cash flow hedge.
 
22

 
We (including our subsidiaries) have never incurred off-balance sheet obligations through the use of, or investment in, off-balance sheet derivative financial instruments or structured finance or special purpose entities organized as corporations, partnerships or limited liability companies, or trusts.
 
         We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments portfolio, funds generated from operations, and available credit facility borrowings are sufficient to satisfy our normal short-term financial needs.
 
Recent Industry Development
 
          See Item 1 of Part II for a discussion of the current legal proceedings concerning the insurance industry’s compensation practices.
 
Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
 
          We make “forward-looking statements” within the “safe harbor” provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 throughout this report and in the documents we incorporate by reference into this report. You can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “may,”“will,”“expect,”“anticipate,”“believe,”“estimate,”“plan” and “continue” or similar words. We have based these statements on our current expectations about future events. Although we believe that our expectations reflected in or suggested by our forward-looking statements are reasonable, our actual results may differ materially from what we currently expect. Important factors which could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements in this report include:
 
·  
material adverse changes in economic conditions in the markets we serve;
 
·  
future regulatory actions and conditions in the states in which we conduct our business;
 
·  
competition from others in the insurance agency and brokerage business;
 
·  
a significant portion of business written by Brown & Brown is for customers located in Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania and Washington. Accordingly, the occurrence of adverse economic conditions, an adverse regulatory climate, or a disaster in any of these states could have a material adverse effect on our business, although no such conditions have been encountered in the past;
 
·  
the integration of our operations with those of businesses or assets we have acquired or may acquire in the future and the failure to realize the expected benefits of such integration; and
 
·  
other risks and uncertainties as may be detailed from time to time in our public announcements and Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings.
 
         You should carefully read this report completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. All forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified by these cautionary statements.

          We do not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements.
 

          Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates and equity prices. We are exposed to market risk through our investments, revolving credit line and term loan agreements.

          Our invested assets are held as cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and investments, available-for-sale marketable equity securities, non-marketable equity securities and certificates of deposit. These investments are subject to interest rate risk and equity price risk. The fair values of our cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and investments, and certificates of deposit at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 approximated their respective carrying values due to their short-term duration and therefore such market risk is not considered to be material.
 
23

 
          We do not actively invest or trade in equity securities. In addition, we generally dispose of any significant equity securities received in conjunction with an acquisition shortly after the acquisition date. However, we have no current intention to add to or dispose of any of the 559,970 common stock shares of Rock-Tenn Company, a publicly-held New York Stock Exchange-listed company, which we have owned for over 10 years. The investment in Rock-Tenn Company accounted for 64% and 68% of the total value of available-for-sale marketable equity securities, non-marketable equity securities and certificates of deposit as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. Rock-Tenn Company’s closing stock price at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 was $12.65 and $15.16, respectively. Our exposure to equity price risk is primarily related to the Rock-Tenn Company investment. As of June 30, 2005, the value of the Rock-Tenn Company investment was $7,084,000.
 
          To hedge the risk of increasing interest rates from January 2, 2002 through the then remaining six years of our seven-year $90.0 million term loan, on December 5, 2001 we entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively converted the floating rate LIBOR-based interest payments to fixed interest rate payments at 4.53%.  We do not otherwise enter into derivatives, swaps or other similar financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
 
        At June 30, 2005, the interest rate swap agreement was as follows (in thousands, except percentages):

 
 
 
Contractual/
Notional Amount
 
Fair Value
 
Weighted Average 
Pay Rates
 
Weighted Average
Received Rates
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap agreement
 
$
32,143
 
$
(277
)
 
4.53
%
 
2.78
%
 
ITEM 4:       CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
          We carried out an evaluation (the “Evaluation”), required by Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1939, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act (“Disclosure Controls”). Although we believe that our pre-existing Disclosure Controls, including our internal controls, were adequate to enable us to comply with our disclosure obligations, as a result of such Evaluation, we implemented certain minor changes, primarily to formalize, document and update the procedures already in place.  Based on the Evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that, subject to the limitations noted herein, our Disclosure Controls are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in our periodic SEC reports.
 
Changes in Internal Controls
 
          There has not been any change in our internal controls over financial reporting identified in connection with the Evaluation that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, those controls.
 
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls
 
          Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls and internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls.
 
          The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
 
24

 
CEO and CFO Certifications
 
          Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 are the Certifications of the CEO and the CFO, respectively. The Certifications are required in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Section 302 Certifications”).  This Item 4 of this report, which you are currently reading, is the information concerning the Evaluation referred to in the Section 302 Certifications, and this information should be read in conjunction with the Section 302 Certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.
 
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
 
In Item 3 of Part I of Brown & Brown, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ending December 31, 2004 as updated by Item I of Part II of Brown & Brown, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005, certain information concerning certain legal proceedings and other matters was disclosed. Such information was current as of the respective dates of such filings. Additional relevant information is set forth below.
 
Policyholder Actions and Related Matters  
 
As previously disclosed, the Company is a defendant in the putative class action lawsuits styled OptiCare Health Systems, Inc. v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., et al.,Stephen Lewis v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.,et al., and Diane Preuss  v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., et al., (together, the “Policyholder Actions”) all of which were transferred by the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation to the District of New Jersey to be coordinated in a single jurisdiction for pre-trial purposes.
 
As previously disclosed, governmental entities in a number of states are looking into issues related to the insurance industry’s compensation practices, and the Company and certain subsidiaries of the Company (collectively, “Brown & Brown”) have received and responded to requests for information from some of them.  No state agency has specifically charged or alleged any wrongdoing or violation of state law by Brown & Brown in connection with these inquiries.
 
As previously disclosed, a demand letter from counsel purporting to represent a current shareholder of the Company and seeking the commencement of a derivative suit by the Company against the Board of Directors and certain current and former officers and directors of Brown & Brown, Inc. for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty related to Brown & Brown’s participation in contingent commission agreements (the “Demand Letter”) was received by the Company’s Board of Directors in December 2004. The Special Review Committee (the “Committee”),  comprised of independent members of the Company’s Board of Directors, was subsequently established to investigate and reach a determination concerning the merits of the proposed derivative action. The Committee retained independent counsel to assist it in this endeavor. In July 2005, the Committee communicated to the Company and to the attorney who sent the Demand Letter its determination that maintenance of the derivative suit is not in the best interests of the Company.  To date, no further communication has been received from the attorney who sent the Demand Letter.
 
As previously disclosed, Brown & Brown has contingent commission agreements with certain underwriters, including revenue-sharing commissions paid by insurance underwriters based primarily on the overall profitability of the aggregate business written with that underwriter, and/or additional factors such as retention ratios and overallvolume of business placed with the underwriter. To a lesser extent, Brown & Brown has some override commission agreements which allow for commissions to be paid by insurance underwriters in excess of the standard commission rate in specific lines of business, such as group health business.  Brown & Brown has not chosen to discontinue receiving contingent commissions.  
 
25

 
Brown & Brown cannot currently predict the impact or resolution of these matters or reasonably estimate a range of possible loss, which could be material. The resolution of these matters may harm Brown & Brown’s business and/or lead to a decrease in or elimination of contingent commissions and override commissions, which could have a material adverse impact on Brown & Brown’s consolidated financial condition.
 
Other
 
Brown & Brown is involved in numerous pending or threatened proceedings by or against Brown & Brown that arise incident to the nature of its business. The damages that may be claimed in these various proceedings are substantial, including in many instances claims for punitive or extraordinary damages. Some of these claims and lawsuits have been resolved, and others are in the process of being resolved, and others are still in the investigation or discovery phase. Brown & Brown will continue to respond appropriately to these claims and lawsuits, and to vigorously protect its interests.
 
               Although the ultimate outcome of the matters referenced in this section titled “Other” cannot be ascertained and liabilities in indeterminate amounts may be imposed on Brown & Brown or its subsidiaries, on the basis of present information, availability of insurance coverages and legal advice received, it is the opinion of management that the disposition or ultimate determination of such claims will not have a material adverse effect on Brown & Brown’s consolidated financial position. However, as (i) one or more of Brown & Brown’s insurance carriers could take the position that portions of these claims are not covered by Brown & Brown’s insurance, (ii) to the extent that payments are made to resolve claims and lawsuits, applicable insurance policy limits are eroded, and (iii) the claims and lawsuits relating to these matters are continuing to develop, it is possible that future results of operations or cash flows for any particular quarterly or annual period could be materially affected by unfavorable resolutions of these matters.
 
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
 
The Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on April 21, 2005. At the meeting, two matters were submitted to a vote of security holders.
 
1.  
Election of ten directors
 
The number of votes cast for, withheld or abstaining with respect to the election of each of the directors is set forth below:
 
 
For
  
Abstain/ Withheld
 
J. Hyatt Brown
61,018,036
  
1,965,808
 
Samuel P. Bell, III
55,027,026
  
7,956,818
 
Hugh M. Brown
62,478,920
  
504,924
 
Bradley Currey, Jr.
62,136,177
  
847,667
 
Jim W. Henderson
61,987,808
  
996,036
 
Theodore J. Hoepner, Jr.
61,995,384
  
988,460
 
David H. Hughes
61,759,181
  
1,224,663
 
John R. Riedman
61,905,183
  
1,078,661
 
Jan E. Smith
61,281,154
  
1,702,690
 
Chilton D. Varner
62,804,276
  
179,568
 
 
 
2.  
The proposal to amend the Company’s Stock Performance Plan (the”Plan”) to extend the term of the Plan for 10 years and also modify the Plan to provide that awards granted under the Performance Plan generally will not be subject to the tax deduction limits of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
 
The number of votes cast for, against or abstaining with respect to the proposal to the Company’s Stock Performance Plan is set forth below:
 
For
50,137,494
 
Against
774,559
 
Abstain
1,237,714
 
 
26

 
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
 
(a)  
EXHIBITS
 
Exhibit 3.1
Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (adopted April 24, 2003) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3a to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003), and Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3a to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999).
  
Exhibit 3.2
Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3b to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002).
  
Exhibit 4.1
Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 15, 2004, among the Company and the listed Purchasers of the 5.57% Series A Senior Notes due September 15, 2011 and 6.08% Series B Senior Notes due July 15, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004).
  
Exhibit 4.2
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving and Term Loan Agreement dated and effective July 15, 2004, by and between Brown & Brown, Inc. and SunTrust Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004).
  
Exhibit 4.3
Second Amendment to Revolving Loan Agreement dated and effective July 15, 2004, by and between Brown & Brown, Inc. and SunTrust Bank. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004).
  
Exhibit 4.4
Rights Agreement, dated as of July 30, 1999, between the Company and First Union National Bank, as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on August 2, 1999).
  
Exhibit 31.1
Section 302 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
  
Exhibit 31.2
Section 302 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.
  
Exhibit 32.1
Section 1350 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
  
Exhibit 32.2
Section 1350 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

27

 
 
(b)
REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
 
The Company filed a current report on Form 8-K on April 19, 2005.  This current report reported Item 12, which announced that the Company issued a press release on April 19, 2005, relating to the Company’s earnings for the first quarter of fiscal year 2005.
 
The Company filed a current report on Form 8-K on May 3, 2005. This current report reported Item 2.02, which announced that the Company’s shareholders amended the Company’s Stock Performance Plan at the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on April 21, 2005.
 
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
   
 BROWN & BROWN, INC.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Date: August 9, 2005By:  /S/ CORY T. WALKER
 
Cory T. Walker
 
Sr. Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(duly authorized officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)
 
28