Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
☑
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended January 30, 2021
OR
☐
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____________ to ______________
Commission file number 1-2191
CALERES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
New York
43-0197190
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(IRS Employer Identification Number)
8300 Maryland Avenue
63105
St. Louis, Missouri
(Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices)
(314) 854-4000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Trading Symbol(s)
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock — par value of $0.01 per share
CAL
New York Stock Exchange
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☑
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
Large accelerated filer ☐
Accelerated filer ☑
Non-accelerated filer ☐
Smaller reporting company ☐
Emerging growth company ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☑
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☑
The aggregate market value of the stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of August 1, 2020, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $224.4 million.
As of February 27, 2021, 37,947,704 common shares were outstanding.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III.
INTRODUCTION
This Annual Report on Form 10-K is a document that U.S. public companies file with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on an annual basis. Part II of the Form 10-K contains the business information and financial statements that many companies include in the financial sections of their annual reports. The other sections of this Form 10-K include further information about our business that we believe will be of interest to investors. We hope investors will find it useful to have all of this information in a single document.
The SEC allows us to report information in the Form 10-K by “incorporating by reference” from another part of the Form 10-K or from the proxy statement. You will see that information is “incorporated by reference” in various parts of our Form 10-K. The proxy statement will be available on our website after it is filed with the SEC in April 2021.
Unless the context otherwise requires, “we,” “us,” “our,” “the Company” or “Caleres” refers to Caleres, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Information in this Form 10-K is current as of March 30, 2021, unless otherwise specified.
CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
In this report, and from time to time throughout the year, we share our expectations for the Company’s future performance. These forward-looking statements include statements about our business plans; the potential development, regulatory approval and public acceptance of our products; our expected financial performance, including sales performance and the anticipated effect of our strategic actions; the anticipated benefits of acquisitions; the outcome of contingencies, such as litigation; domestic or international economic, political and market conditions; and other factors that could affect our future results of operations or financial position, including, without limitation, statements under the captions “Business,” “Legal Proceedings” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Any statements we make that are not matters of current disclosures or historical fact should be considered forward-looking. Such statements often include words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “will” and similar expressions. By their nature, these types of statements are uncertain and are not guarantees of our future performance.
Our forward-looking statements represent our estimates and expectations at the time that we make them. However, circumstances change constantly, often unpredictably, and investors should not place undue reliance on these statements. Many events beyond our control will determine whether our expectations will be realized. For example, we experienced an adverse impact on our financial results in 2020 as a result of the coronavirus pandemic and may experience further deterioration depending on actions taken by government officials to address the spread of the virus, the pace of vaccination efforts and the introduction or spread of any variants of the coronavirus. We disclaim any current intention or obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, or the factors that may affect their realization, whether in light of new information, future events or otherwise, and investors should not rely on us to do so. In the interests of our investors, and in accordance with the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors explains some of the important reasons that actual results may be materially different from those that we anticipate.
2
INDEX
PART I
Page
Item 1
Business
4
Item 1A
Risk Factors
13
Item 1B
Unresolved Staff Comments
21
Item 2
Properties
Item 3
Legal Proceedings
Item 4
Mine Safety Disclosures
22
PART II
Item 5
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Item 6
Selected Financial Data
23
Item 7
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
41
Item 8
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
42
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
43
44
Consolidated Balance Sheets
47
Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Loss)
48
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
49
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
50
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
51
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
52
Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
97
Item 9
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9A
Controls and Procedures
98
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Item 9B
Other Information
PART III
Item 10
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Item 11
Executive Compensation
99
Item 12
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 13
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
100
Item 14
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
PART IV
101
Item 15
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Item 16
Form 10-K Summary
104
3
ITEM 1BUSINESS
Caleres, Inc. (the "Company"), originally founded as Brown Shoe Company in 1878 and incorporated in 1913, is a global footwear company. Current activities include the operation of retail shoe stores and e-commerce websites, as well as the design, development, sourcing, manufacturing, marketing and wholesale distribution of footwear for women, men and children. Our business is seasonal in nature due to consumer spending patterns, with higher back-to-school and holiday season sales. Traditionally, the third fiscal quarter accounts for a substantial portion of our earnings for the year.
Our net sales are comprised of four major categories: women’s footwear, men’s footwear, children’s footwear and clothing and accessories. The percentage of net sales attributable to each category is as follows:
2020
2019
2018
Women's footwear
61
%
63
Men's footwear
24
Children's footwear
10
9
8
Clothing and accessories
6
7
Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on our Business
The United States and global economies continue to be adversely affected by the coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic, which was declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization in March 2020. During the first half of 2020 our retail stores were temporarily closed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. We took decisive actions to mitigate the adverse impact of the pandemic, including the following:
In addition, as a precautionary measure to preserve financial flexibility given the uncertainty in the United States and global markets resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, we increased the borrowing capacity on our revolving credit facility to $600.0 million in April 2020. Although we have reopened all of our retail stores from the temporary store closures in the first half of 2020, our business results were negatively impacted in 2020 by the COVID-19 pandemic and continue to be impacted. Many of our stores have reduced operating hours and have experienced declines in foot traffic with stay-at-home orders and other government mandates, which resulted in lower sales in 2020, despite our e-commerce business experiencing robust growth during this time. In addition, a small number of stores have temporarily closed again, due to local government mandates or illness.
We believe we are better positioned and prepared to manage through this period as a result of the actions we have taken. However, the depth and duration of the pandemic and its impact on overall consumer confidence and spending is not known. While vaccination efforts are currently underway, we continue to experience disruption to our business, and expect an adverse impact on our financial results in 2021. The extent and duration of COVID-19 on our financial performance depends on factors outside of our control, including actions taken by government officials, the pace of vaccination efforts
and the introduction or spread of any COVID-19 variants. For a further discussion on the risks, uncertainties and actions we have taken in response to COVID-19, refer to Item 1A, Risk Factors, and Part II, Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Human Capital Management
As of January 30, 2021, we had approximately 8,400 employees, including 4,900 full-time and 3,500 part-time. In the United States, there were no employees subject to union contracts. In Canada, we employ approximately 20 warehouse employees under a union contract, which expires in October 2022. The Company’s success depends on our ability to attract, develop, motivate and retain qualified management, administrative, product design and development and sales and marketing personnel to support existing operations and future growth.
Compensation Programs and Employee Benefits
We believe that pay, benefits and incentives make up the total rewards package and provide employees and their families with financial protection and security for the future. Our compensation programs are designed to encourage and reward our executives and associates for superior performance and drive long-term shareholder value. We offer a comprehensive benefits package to our employees that provides, among other benefits, competitive salaries and wages; comprehensive health insurance coverage to eligible employees; retirement plans; education assistance; paid time off; and charitable giving opportunities through the Caleres Cares Charitable Trust, including volunteer opportunities and our matching gift program.
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
Caleres was founded on the insight that people are unique, and we are proud of our inclusive and collaborative environment where differences are celebrated. We believe that Caleres should be as diverse as our customers. We seek and engage talented individuals from all backgrounds, ethnicities, genders, lifestyles and belief systems.
During 2020, we made a commitment to our employees, partners and customers to recharge our diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, including refining our diversity strategy, creating a Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Council, and providing mandatory unconscious bias training for all employees. In October 2020, we hired a senior-level executive to drive these initiatives, as well as oversee the Company’s affirmative action plans and monitor employee engagement.
ESG Initiative
We made significant progress on our environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) initiative during 2020. We remain focused on using sustainable materials in the footwear we source and sell. During the first quarter of 2021, we plan to publish our inaugural corporate ESG report, which will detail our ESG strategy, highlight our accomplishments, provide key disclosures and discuss both our short and long-term goals for sustainable products and practices.
Competition
With many companies operating e-commerce and traditional brick and mortar retail shoe stores and shoe departments, we compete in a highly fragmented market. In addition, the continuing consumer shift to online and mobile shopping has increased price competition and requires retailers to lower shipping costs charged to customers, improve shipping speeds and optimize mobile platforms. Our competitors include local, regional and national shoe store chains, department stores, discount stores, mass merchandisers, numerous independent retail operators of various sizes and e-commerce businesses. Quality of products and services, store location, trend-right merchandise selection and availability of brands, pricing, marketing, advertising and consumer service are all factors that impact retail competition.
In addition, our wholesale customers sell shoes purchased from competing footwear suppliers. Those competing footwear suppliers own and license brands, many of which are well-known and marketed aggressively. Many retailers, who are our wholesale customers, source directly from factories or through agents. The wholesale footwear business has low barriers to entry, which further intensifies competition.
FAMOUS FOOTWEAR
Our Famous Footwear segment is one of America’s leading family-branded footwear retailers, with $1.3 billion in net sales for 2020. Famous Footwear employs an omni-channel approach to reach consumers wherever they want to shop, including our growing e-commerce channel through famousfootwear.com and famousfootwear.ca, as well as over 900
5
Famous Footwear retail locations. Our core consumers are those who seek leading national brands of athletic, casual and fashionable footwear at a value for themselves and their families.
Famous Footwear features a wide selection of brand name athletic, casual and dress shoes for the entire family. Brands carried include, among others, Nike, Skechers, adidas, Vans, Converse, Crocs, Puma, Birkenstock, Asics, New Balance, Under Armour, Bearpaw, Timberland and Sperry, as well as company-owned and licensed brands including, among others, Dr. Scholl’s Shoes, Blowfish Malibu, LifeStride, Naturalizer, Circus by Sam Edelman, Franco Sarto and Ryka. Our company-owned and licensed products are sold to our Famous Footwear segment by our Brand Portfolio segment at a profit and represent approximately 6% of the Famous Footwear segment’s net sales. We work closely with our vendors to provide consumers with fresh product and, in some cases, product exclusively designed for and available only at Famous Footwear. Famous Footwear’s retail price points typically range from $20 for shoes up to $260 for boots.
Famousfootwear.com and famousfootwear.ca offer an expansive product assortment, beyond what is sold in our retail stores. Accessible via desktop, tablet and mobile devices, these e-commerce websites help consumers explore product assortments, including items available in local stores, and make purchases. Many of our consumers also enjoy the convenience of buying online and picking up product in their local store. We continue to enhance our digital technology and e-commerce platform, recently adding features such as consumer-specific offers and advanced search capabilities. We have also launched a new version of the Famous Footwear Rewards mobile application to deliver a superior experience for the 80% of our online shoppers who visit our site on a mobile device.
Famous Footwear also has an extensive customer loyalty program, Famously You Rewards (“Rewards”), which informs and rewards members with free shipping and bonus points for online purchases, product previews, earned incentives based upon purchase continuity and other periodic promotional offers. Our e-commerce websites allow members of Rewards to view their points status and purchase history, manage profile settings and engage further with the brand. Famous Footwear’s mobile app also serves as a hub for Rewards members to shop, find local stores, redeem Rewards certificates and learn about the newest products, latest trends and hottest deals.
Our Famous Footwear stores are located in strip shopping centers as well as outlet and regional malls in 49 states, Canada and Guam. The breakdown by venue at the end of each of the last three fiscal years is as follows:
Strip centers
600
624
653
Outlet malls
175
177
183
Regional malls
141
148
156
Total
916
949
992
We expect to open approximately 10 new stores and close approximately 60 stores in 2021, as we continue to align our real estate and e-commerce strategies. New stores typically experience an initial start-up period characterized by lower sales and operating earnings than what is generally achieved by more mature stores. While the duration of this start-up period may vary by type of store, economic environment and geographic location, new stores typically reach a normal level of profitability within approximately four years.
Famous Footwear relies on merchandise allocation systems and processes that use allocation criteria, consumer segmentation and inventory data in an effort to ensure stores are adequately stocked with product and to differentiate the needs of each store based on location, consumer segmentation and other factors. Famous Footwear’s distribution systems allow for merchandise to be delivered to each store weekly, or on a more frequent basis, as needed. Famous Footwear also uses regional third-party pooled distribution sites across the country.
Famous Footwear’s marketing programs include e-commerce advertising, digital marketing and social media, direct mail and in-store advertisements, all of which are designed to further develop and reinforce the Famous Footwear concept and strengthen our connection with consumers. We believe the success of our marketing campaigns is attributable to highlighting key categories and tailoring the timing of such messaging to adapt to seasonal shopping patterns. In 2020, we spent approximately $40.2 million to advertise and market Famous Footwear to our target consumers, a portion of which was recovered from suppliers.
BRAND PORTFOLIO
Our Brand Portfolio segment offers retailers and consumers a portfolio of leading brands by designing, developing, sourcing, manufacturing, marketing and distributing branded footwear for women, men and children at a variety of price points. Certain of our branded footwear products are sold under brand names that are owned by the Company and others are developed pursuant to licensing agreements. Our Brand Portfolio segment sells footwear on a wholesale basis to retailers. The segment also sells footwear on a direct-to-consumer basis through our branded retail stores and e-commerce businesses.
Portfolio of Brands
The following is a listing of our principal brands and licensed products:
Naturalizer: Since 1927, we’ve crafted beautiful and modern styles that look and feel exceptional, inside and out. In fact, Naturalizer is the first to construct shoes to withstand the test of time. Our legendary emphasis on fit and elegant simplicity launched a brand that became known as “the shoe with the beautiful fit.”
Our Naturalizer brand is sold primarily at Naturalizer retail stores, national chains, online retailers, online at naturalizer.com and naturalizer.ca, department stores and independent retailers. Naturalizer footwear is also distributed through wholesale partners in 37 countries around the world and approximately 47 retail stores. Suggested retail price points range from $69 for shoes to $240 for boots. In November 2020, we announced that, with the exception of a limited number of flagship locations, we planned to close all Naturalizer retail stores in the United States and Canada. We expect all planned retail store closures to be completed in the first quarter of 2021. We continue to view the Naturalizer brand as a strong and value-driving component of our portfolio of brands. Therefore, we will be focusing on growing the brand’s e-commerce through naturalizer.com, our retail partners and their websites, and the flagship stores.
Vionic: In October 2018, we acquired Vionic to expand our access to the growing contemporary comfort footwear category. Vionic brings together style and science, combining innovative biomechanics with the most coveted trends. Vionic designs its Three-Zone Comfort technology into every shoe it makes, resulting in unparalleled stability, ultimate arch support, and cushioning. As pioneers in foot health with a global team of experts behind the brand, Vionic brings a fresh perspective to fashionable, supportive footwear. Featuring a wide range of silhouettes, premium materials, and thoughtful design for women and men, Vionic offers the style you want with the comfort you crave across a vast selection of sneakers, active, casual & dress options, sandals, boots, and slippers. The brand is sold online, through independent retailers, television, department stores, national chains and specialty retailers for suggested retail price points from $40 for shoes to $250 for boots.
Sam Edelman: Designer Sam Edelman’s lifestyle brand is inspired by timeless American elegance that bridges the gap between aspiration and attainability to define modern luxury. Sam Edelman footwear is sold primarily through e-commerce retailers, national chains, department stores, Sam Edelman retail stores, online at samedelman.com, catalogs and independent retailers at suggested retail price points from $50 for shoes to $300 for boots.
Dr. Scholl’s Shoes: Inspired by its founder Dr. William Scholl, Dr. Scholl’s Shoes remains forever passionate about creating iconic, effortless footwear for a healthy life. This footwear reaches consumers at a wide range of distribution channels including national chains, department stores, mass merchandisers, online, including drschollshoes.com, our Famous Footwear retail stores and independent retailers. Suggested price points range from $50 for shoes to $190 for boots. We have a long-term license agreement to sell Dr. Scholl’s Shoes, which is renewable through December 2026 for sales in the United States, Canada and Latin America.
Blowfish Malibu: In July 2018, we acquired a controlling interest in Blowfish Malibu. Blowfish Malibu, which was founded in 2005, designs and sells women’s and children’s footwear that captures the fresh youthful spirit and casual living that is distinctively Southern California. The brand is sold at national chains, our Famous Footwear stores and independent retailers. Suggested retail price points range from $20 for shoes to $90 for boots.
Allen Edmonds: In December 2016, we acquired Allen Edmonds to increase our penetration in men’s footwear. Allen Edmonds, founded in 1922, is a U.S.-based direct-to-consumer and wholesaler of premium men’s footwear, apparel, leather goods and accessories with a strong manufacturing heritage. Allen Edmonds products are available at our 69 Allen
Edmonds stores in the United States, online at allenedmonds.com and at select retailers worldwide at suggested retail price points from $245 for shoes to $495 for boots.
LifeStride: For more than 70 years, LifeStride has created quality footwear for women who value both style and all-day comfort. The brand is sold in national chains, our Famous Footwear retail stores, online, including lifestride.com and department stores at suggested retail price points ranging from $60 for shoes to $110 for boots.
Franco Sarto: The Franco Sarto brand embodies timeless, wearable style inspired by the craft and design of Italian footwear. The brand is sold in major national chains, online, including francosarto.com, department stores, specialty retailers, our Famous Footwear stores and independent retailers at suggested retail price points from $89 for shoes to $280 for boots.
Rykä: For over 30 years, Rykä has been innovating athletic footwear exclusively for women. The brand is distributed through national chains, online retailers, including ryka.com, independent retailers, department stores, specialty retailers and our Famous Footwear retail stores at suggested retail price points from $60 to $100.
Vince: The Vince women’s shoe collection launched in 2012 and was expanded in 2014 to include the Vince men’s footwear collection. The brand is primarily sold in premier department stores, online, national chains and specialty retailers at suggested price points from $195 for shoes to $695 for boots. We have a license agreement with Vince, LLC to sell Vince footwear through December 2021.
Bzees: Bzees is a brand of machine washable women’s footwear designed to make you feel weightless, energized and free. The brand is distributed through national chains, department stores, online retailers including bzees.com, independent retailers, specialty retailers and our retail stores at suggested retail price points from $59 for shoes to $179 for boots.
Zodiac: The Zodiac brand was launched in the late 1970s and acquired by us in 2005. In July 2019, we initiated a brand refresh by blending the past with the present to provide authentic, quality footwear that is supremely relevant for today’s modern and expressive consumer lifestyles. The brand relaunched in 2020 and Zodiac is now available at major national chains, at online retailers, including zodiacshoes.com, and through our Famous Footwear business at suggested retail price points ranging from $69 for sandals to $149 for boots.
Veronica Beard: In 2019, we announced an exclusive partnership with the American ready-to-wear brand, Veronica Beard, to produce their women’s footwear collection, beginning with the spring 2020 season. The Veronica Beard collection includes styles that strike the balance between cool and classic, taking the consumer from day to night and work to weekend. The brand is distributed through domestic wholesale partners carrying Veronica Beard ready-to-wear and independent footwear retailers at suggested retail price points ranging from $295 for shoes to $450 for boots.
Wholesale
Within our Brand Portfolio segment, our brands are distributed on a wholesale basis to approximately 4,200 retailers, including online retailers, national chains, department stores, mass merchandisers and independent retailers throughout the United States and Canada, as well as approximately 66 other countries (including sales to our retail operations). Our most significant wholesale customers include Famous Footwear and many of the nation’s largest retailers, including online retailers such as Amazon.com, Nordstrom.com, Macys.com and Zappos.com; national chains such as DSW, Nordstrom Rack, TJX Corporation (including TJ Maxx and Marshalls), Ross Stores and Kohl’s; department stores such as Dillard’s, Nordstrom and Macy’s, mass merchandisers such as Walmart; and independent retailers such as Qurate Retail Group, which operates QVC, Home Shopping Network and Zulily. We also sell product to a variety of international retail customers and distributors. The loss of any one or more of our significant customers could have a material impact on our Brand Portfolio segment and the Company.
Our Brand Portfolio segment sold approximately 33 million pairs of shoes on a wholesale basis during 2020. We sell footwear to wholesale customers on both a landed and a first-cost basis. Landed sales are those in which we obtain title to the footwear from our overseas suppliers and maintain title until the footwear clears United States customs and is shipped to our wholesale customers. Landed sales generally carry a higher profit rate than first-cost sales as a result of the brand equity associated with the product along with the additional customs, warehousing and logistics services provided
to customers and the risks associated with inventory ownership. To allow for the prompt shipment of reorders and to satisfy our growing e-commerce demand, we carry inventories of certain styles. First-cost sales are those in which we obtain title to footwear from our overseas suppliers and typically relinquish title to customers at a designated overseas port. Many of these customers then import this product into the United States.
Products sold under license agreements accounted for approximately 15% of the sales of the Brand Portfolio segment in 2020, 16% of the segment’s sales in 2019 and 20% of the segment’s sales in 2018. Caleres also receives license revenue from third parties related to certain owned brands, for use in connection with other brand-enhancing non-footwear product categories.
Direct-to-Consumer
Our Brand Portfolio segment includes the operations of several e-commerce websites, including naturalizer.com, naturalizer.ca, vionicshoes.com, samedelman.com, allenedmonds.com, drschollsshoes.com, lifestride.com, francosarto.com, ryka.com, bzees.com and zodiacshoes.com, which offer substantially the same product selection to consumers as we sell to our wholesale customers. Vince.com, blowfishshoes.com, and veronicabeard.com complement our distribution of those brands. References to our website addresses do not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained on the websites and the information contained on the websites is not part of this report.
We also operate retail stores for certain brands, including Naturalizer, Allen Edmonds and Sam Edelman. The number of our Brand Portfolio retail stores at the end of the last three fiscal years was as follows:
Naturalizer
80
139
140
Allen Edmonds
69
74
76
Sam Edelman
15
170
228
229
At the end of 2020, we operated 50 Naturalizer stores in Canada, 25 in the United States and five in China. In November 2020, we announced that, with the exception of a limited number of flagship locations, we planned to close all Naturalizer retail stores in the United States and Canada. During 2020, we operated 69 Allen Edmonds stores in the United States, each averaging approximately 1,600 square feet. We operated 13 Sam Edelman stores in the United States and eight in China at the end of 2020, each averaging approximately 2,400 square feet.
Marketing
We continue to build on the recognition of our portfolio of brands to create differentiation and consumer loyalty. Our marketing teams are responsible for the development and implementation of innovative marketing programs that serve the consumer facing needs of our portfolio of brands as well as that of our retail partners. In 2020, we spent approximately $33.0 million in advertising and marketing support for our Brand Portfolio segment, including digital marketing and social media, consumer media advertising, product placement, production, print, trade shows and in-store displays. The marketing teams are also responsible for driving the development of branding and content for our brand websites. We continually focus on enhancing the effectiveness of these marketing efforts through consumer insights, market research, product development and marketing communications that collectively address the ever-changing lives and needs of our consumers. Our marketing teams are instrumental in continuing to drive growth in e-commerce sales, producing relevant and purpose-driven brand positioning and creating meaningful connections with consumers that have increased awareness and loyalty across our portfolio. We continue to leverage consumer insights and data to inform marketing initiatives to capture a greater share of our target consumers’ spend as well as reach new audiences with a high propensity to purchase our products.
Product Development, Sourcing and Manufacturing Operations
We develop and source footwear for our Brand Portfolio segment and also a portion of the footwear sold by our Famous Footwear segment. We have sourcing and product development offices in Clayton, Missouri; Dongguan, China; Putian, China; San Rafael and Culver City, California; New York, New York; Port Washington, Wisconsin; Florence, Italy; Macau; Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; Hong Kong and Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. In addition, we have manufacturing facilities in Port Washington, Wisconsin and Santiago, Dominican Republic that manufacture our Allen Edmonds footwear.
Product Development Operations
We maintain design and product development teams for our brands in Clayton, Missouri; Dongguan, China; Putian, China; San Rafael, California; New York, New York; Port Washington, Wisconsin and Culver City, California, as well as other select fashion locations, including Florence, Italy. These teams, which include independent designers, are responsible for the creation and development of new product styles. Our designers monitor trends in fashion footwear and apparel and work closely with retailers to identify consumer footwear preferences. Our design teams create collections of footwear, and our product development and sourcing offices convert those designs into new footwear styles. We operate a sample-making facility in Dongguan, China that allows us to have greater control over our product development in terms of accuracy, execution and speed-to-market. Our long-range plans include further expansion into new markets outside of China, growing our use of 3D design technology in developing new product, and continuing to drive excellence in product value and execution in a rapidly changing manufacturing landscape. Our distribution center campus in Chino, California, which opened in 2018, provides additional shipping flexibility, operational efficiencies and an expansion of our logistics infrastructure capacity.
Sourcing Operations
In 2020, the sourcing operations sourced approximately 28 million pairs of shoes through a global network of third-party independent footwear manufacturers. The majority of our footwear sourced is provided by approximately 75 manufacturers operating approximately 115 manufacturing facilities. In certain countries, we use agents to facilitate and manage the development, production and shipment of product. We attribute our ability to achieve consistent quality, competitive prices and on-time delivery to the breadth of these established relationships. While we generally do not have significant contractual commitments with our suppliers, we do enter into sourcing agreements with certain independent sourcing agents. Prior to production, we monitor the quality of all of our footwear components and also inspect the prototypes of each footwear style.
The following table provides an overview of our sourcing by country in 2020:
Millions of
Country
Pairs
China
18.4
Vietnam
8.5
India
0.6
Other
0.9
28.4
Manufacturing
While we source the majority of our footwear from independent footwear manufacturers as discussed above, we also maintain and operate manufacturing facilities in Port Washington, Wisconsin and Santiago, Dominican Republic. These facilities manufacture footwear and certain accessories for our Allen Edmonds brand. We believe operating our own manufacturing facilities in North America provides us with greater control over the quality and craftsmanship that are essential to the iconic Allen Edmonds brand. In addition, our Port Washington facility serves our recrafting operations, which allows the Allen Edmonds consumer to extend the life of their footwear, restoring their shoes to nearly their original state.
Backlog
At January 30, 2021, our Brand Portfolio segment had a backlog of unfilled wholesale orders of approximately $218.2 million, compared to $295.4 million on February 1, 2020. Most orders are for delivery within the next 90 to 120 days. Orders are subject to cancellation, and many of our wholesale partners canceled orders during the first half of 2020 due to the business impact of COVID-19 resulting in the temporary closure of their retail stores. However, prior to 2020, we have not experienced significant cancellations of orders. The decrease in our backlog order levels reflects fewer orders as our wholesale customers shift to responding to consumer demand in-season, resulting in fewer upfront orders, as well as the ongoing economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The backlog at any particular time is affected by a number of factors, including seasonality, the continuing trend among customers to reduce the lead time on their orders, capacity shifts at international manufacturers, and the volume of retail
replenishment and e-commerce drop ship orders that are received immediately rather than in advance. Accordingly, a comparison of backlog from period to period may not be indicative of eventual actual shipments or the growth rate of sales from one period to the next.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
Our Internet address is www.caleres.com. Our Internet address is included in this annual report on Form 10-K as an inactive textual reference only. The information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 10-K and should not be considered part of this report. We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. We make available free of charge our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished, as required by Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, through our Internet website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with or furnish it to the SEC. You may access these SEC filings via the hyperlink to a third-party SEC filings website that we provide on our website.
INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following is a list of the names and ages of the executive officers of the Company and of the offices held by each person. There is no family relationship between any of the named persons. The terms of the following executive officers will expire in May 2021 or upon their respective successors being chosen and qualified.
Name
Age
Current Position
Diane M. Sullivan
65
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
John W. Schmidt
60
President
Angela A. Bass
Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer
Thomas C. Burke
53
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Michael R. Edwards
Division President – Famous Footwear
Daniel R. Friedman
Chief Sourcing Officer
Kenneth H. Hannah
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Todd E. Hasty
Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer
Willis D. Hill
Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer
Douglas W. Koch
Senior Vice President, Strategic Projects
Mark A. Schmitt
57
Senior Vice President, Chief Logistics Officer
The period of service of each officer in the positions listed and other business experience are set forth below.
Diane M. Sullivan, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors since February 2014. President and Chief Executive Officer from May 2011 to November 2020. President and Chief Operating Officer from March 2006 to May 2011. President from January 2004 to March 2006.
John W. Schmidt, President since December 2020. Division President – Brand Portfolio from October 2015 to December 2020. Division President – Contemporary Fashion Brands from January 2011 to September 2015. Senior Vice President, Better and Image Brands from January 2010 to January 2011. Senior Vice President and General Manager, Better and Image Brands from March 2008 until January 2010. Various positions, including Vice President, President, Group President of Wholesale Footwear for Nine West Group from September 1998 to February 2008.
Angela A. Bass, Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer since September 2019. Owner and Principal Consultant, Angela A. Bass Consulting, LLC from August 2017 to August 2019. Executive Vice President of Global Human Resources, Performance Sports Group Ltd from January 2012 to July 2017.
Thomas C. Burke, Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since August 2016. Vice President, Legal from December 2015 to August 2016. Deputy General Counsel from March 2012 to December 2015. Various positions at the Company, including Associate General Counsel and Director, Talent Management, from March 2001 to March 2012.
11
Michael R. Edwards, Division President – Famous Footwear since November 2020. Senior Vice President, Digital Commerce, Planning, Allocation and Stores from February 2018 to November 2020. Chief Customer Officer from September 2017 to February 2018. Senior Vice President, Planning, Allocation and Analytics from December 2016 to September 2017. Vice President, Planning and Allocation from May 2015 to December 2016. Vice President, Merchandising and Sales Operations from October 2011 to May 2015.
Daniel R. Friedman, Division President – Global Supply Chain since January 2010. Senior Vice President, Product Development and Sourcing from July 2006 to January 2010. Managing Director at Camuto Group, Inc. from 2002 to July 2006.
Kenneth H. Hannah, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer since February 2015. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of JC Penney Company, Inc. from May 2012 to March 2014. Executive Vice President and President–Solar Energy of MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. and had previously served as Executive Vice President and President–Solar Materials from 2009 to 2012. Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. from 2006 to 2009.
Todd E. Hasty, Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer since January 2020. Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer from March 2019 to January 2020. Vice President, Controller from March 2016 to March 2019. Vice President, Assistant Controller from October 2007 to March 2016.
Willis D. Hill, Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer since September 2018. Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer from August 2017 to September 2018. Senior Vice President, Information Technology from January 2017 to August 2017. Vice President, Retail Information Technology from July 2011 to January 2017. Director, Retail Information Technology from July 2008 to July 2011.
Douglas W. Koch, Senior Vice President, Strategic Projects since September 2019. Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer from January 2016 to September 2019. Senior Vice President and Chief Talent and Strategy Officer from January 2011 to January 2016. Senior Vice President and Chief Talent Officer from May 2005 to January 2011. Senior Vice President, Human Resources from March 2002 to May 2005.
Mark A. Schmitt, Senior Vice President, Chief Logistics Officer since September 2018. Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer and Logistics from February 2013 to September 2018. Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer from January 2012 through February 2013. Senior Director of Management Information Systems for Express Scripts from 2010 through 2011. Various management information systems positions including Group Director with Anheuser-Busch InBev from 1996 to 2009.
12
ITEM 1ARISK FACTORS
MACROECONOMIC AND INDUSTRY RISKS
The coronavirus pandemic has adversely affected and continues to impact our business operations, store traffic and financial condition.
The coronavirus pandemic both in the U.S. and globally, and related government and private sector responsive actions, has adversely affected and continues to impact our business operations. Retail store traffic was significantly lower in 2020 as a result of COVID-19. It is impossible to predict the effect and ultimate impact of COVID-19 and the impact on the economy, the retail industry and the Company. The extent to which COVID-19 will continue to impact our results will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including the actions taken to contain it or treat its impact. A delay in widespread distribution of a vaccine, or a lack of public acceptance of a vaccine could hamper consumer demand. Further, there is no assurance that the vaccine will ultimately be successful in limiting or stopping the spread of COVID-19. A continuation of the health crisis may have a material impact on the retail sector, consumer demand, and the Company’s results of operations and liquidity.
Consumer demand for our products may be adversely impacted by economic conditions and other factors.
Worldwide economic conditions continue to be uncertain. Consumer confidence and spending are strongly influenced by general economic conditions and other factors, including the COVID-19 pandemic, fiscal policy, the changing tax and regulatory environment, interest rates, minimum wage rates and regulations, inflation, consumer debt levels, the availability of consumer credit, the liquidity of consumers’ assets, health care costs, currency exchange rates, taxation, energy costs, real estate values, foreclosure rates, unemployment trends, weather conditions and the economic consequences of military action or terrorist activities. We experienced a decline in sales of dress footwear during 2020 due to limited social gatherings and the shift towards working from home as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Negative economic conditions generally decrease disposable income and, consequently, consumer purchases of discretionary items like our products. Negative trends in economic conditions could also drive up the cost of our products, which may require us to increase our product prices. These increases in our product costs, and possibly prices, may not be offset by comparable increases in consumer disposable income. As a result, our customers may choose to purchase fewer of our products or purchase the lower priced products of our competitors, and our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be adversely affected. The long-term economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting global economic decline on consumer demand for our products cannot be reasonably predicted.
If we are unable to anticipate and respond to consumer preferences and fashion trends and successfully apply new technology, we may not be able to maintain or increase our net sales and earnings.
The footwear industry is subject to rapidly changing consumer shopping preferences and patterns and fashion trends. Our products must appeal to a broad range of consumers whose preferences cannot be predicted with certainty and are subject to rapid change. In addition, the rapid consumer shift to online and mobile shopping, which was further accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, is requiring retailers to lower shipping costs charged to customers, improve shipping speeds and optimize mobile platforms. The trend toward online and mobile shopping increases the volume of smaller shipments, including single-pair shipments, from our warehouses. The increased volume of smaller shipments may result in higher average distribution costs, including both shipping and processing costs incurred at our distribution centers. In addition, an increase in e-commerce sales volume, which have higher return rates than in-store sales, may in turn lead to higher shipping and processing costs. The success of both our wholesale and retail operations depends largely on our ability to anticipate, understand and react to these changing consumer shopping patterns. If we fail to respond to changes in consumer shopping patterns, demands and fashion trends, develop new products and designs, and implement effective, responsive merchandising and distribution strategies and programs, we could experience lower sales, excess inventories and lower gross margins, any of which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
We operate in a highly competitive industry.
Competition is intense in the footwear industry. There has also been consolidation of competitors in the industry, resulting in certain competitors that are larger and have greater financial, marketing and technological resources than we do. In addition, a move toward vertical integration by our competitors could create additional competitive pressures that may decrease our market share. Other competitors are able to offer footwear on a lateral basis alongside their apparel products, or have successfully branded their trademarks as lifestyle brands, resulting in greater competitive advantages. Low barriers
to entry into this industry further intensify competition by allowing new companies to easily enter the markets in which we compete. Some of our suppliers further compound these competitive pressures by allowing consumers to purchase their products directly through supplier-maintained e-commerce sites and retail stores. The Internet facilitates price transparency and comparison shopping, which increases the level of competition we face and puts competitive pressure on us to keep our prices low.
We believe that our ability to compete successfully in the footwear industry depends on a number of factors, including style, price, performance, quality, location and service, as well as the strength of our brand names. We remain competitive by increasing awareness of our brands, improving the efficiency of our supply chain and enhancing the style, comfort, fashion and perceived value of our products. However, our competitors may implement more effective marketing campaigns, adopt more aggressive pricing policies, make more attractive offers to potential employees, distribution partners and manufacturers, or respond more quickly to changes in consumer preferences than us. As a result, we may not be able to compete successfully in the future, and increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced gross margins, loss of market share and an inability to generate cash flows that are sufficient to maintain or expand the development and marketing of our products, which could adversely impact our financial results.
Customer concentration and other trends in customer behavior may lead to a reduction in or loss of sales.
Our wholesale customers include e-commerce retailers, national chains, department stores, mass merchandisers and independent retailers. Several of our customers operate multiple department store divisions. Furthermore, we often sell multiple types of branded, licensed and private-label footwear to these same customers. While we believe purchasing decisions in many cases are made independently by the buyers and merchandisers of each of the customers, a decision by a significant customer to decrease the amount of footwear products purchased from us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
In addition, with the growing trend toward retail trade consolidation, including store count reductions at major retail chains, and consumers’ continued shift to online shopping, we and our wholesale customers increasingly depend upon a reduced number of key retailers whose bargaining strength is growing. This consolidation may result in the following adverse consequences:
We also face the following risks with respect to our customers:
14
Our quarterly sales and earnings may fluctuate, which may result in volatility in, or a decline in, our stock price.
Our quarterly sales and earnings can vary due to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including the following:
As a result of these specific and other general factors, our operating results will vary from quarter to quarter and the results for any particular quarter may not be indicative of results for the full year. Any shortfall in sales or earnings from the levels expected by investors could cause a decrease in the trading price of our common stock.
Foreign currency fluctuations may result in higher costs and decreased gross profits.
Although we purchase most of our products from international manufacturers in United States dollars and otherwise may engage in foreign currency hedging transactions from time to time, we may experience cost variations with respect to exchange rate changes. Currency exchange rate fluctuations may also adversely impact third parties who manufacture the Company’s products by making their purchases of raw materials or other production costs more expensive and more difficult to finance, resulting in higher prices and lower margins for the Company, its distributors and licensees.
A long-term decline in our stock price may result in impairment charges.
As a result of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the economy and volatility in global stock prices, including the Company’s stock price, we recognized material impairment charges during 2020. If there are additional periods of lower stock market valuations or an adverse impact to cash flow projections as a result of the impact of COVID-19 or other economic conditions, we may be required to perform additional impairment tests for intangible assets and long-lived assets, which may result in additional material impairment charges.
OPERATIONAL RISKS
We rely primarily on international sources of production, which subjects our business to risks associated with international trade.
We rely primarily on international sourcing for our footwear products through third-party manufacturing facilities located outside the United States. As is common in the industry, we do not have any long-term contracts with our third-party international manufacturers. International sourcing is subject to numerous risks, including trade relations, work stoppages, transportation delays (including delays at international and domestic ports) and costs (including customs duties, quotas, tariffs, anti-dumping duties, safeguard measures, cargo restrictions or other trade restrictions), domestic and international political instability, foreign currency fluctuations, variable economic conditions, expropriation, nationalization, natural disasters, terrorist acts and military conflict, changes in governmental regulations (including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act) and geo-political events. We have recently experienced supply chain disruptions and port congestion, leading to delayed receipt of inventory in 2021. If supply chain disruptions continue, our financial results could be adversely impacted. In addition, the imposition of tariffs or other costs on imported products may result in an increase in
product prices, which may in turn adversely impact our gross margins if we are unable to mitigate the impact of the costs. There is also uncertainty surrounding the impact of any changes to trade legislation as a result of the shift in the U.S. presidential administration and control of the U.S. Congress. At the same time, potential changes in manufacturing preferences, including, but not limited to the following, pose additional risk and uncertainty:
As a result of these risks, there can be no assurance that we will not experience reductions in available production capacity, increases in our product costs, late deliveries or terminations of our supplier relationships. Furthermore, these sourcing risks are compounded by the lack of diversification in the geographic location of our international sourcing and manufacturing. Approximately 65% of the footwear we sourced in 2020 was from China. With the majority of our supply originating in China, a substantial portion of our supply could be at risk in the event of any significant negative development related to relations between United States and China.
Although we believe we could find alternative manufacturing sources for the products that we currently source from third-party manufacturing facilities in China or other countries, we may not be able to locate alternative manufacturers on terms as favorable as our current terms, including pricing, payment terms, manufacturing capacity, quality standards and lead times for delivery. In addition, there is substantial competition in the footwear industry for quality footwear manufacturers. Accordingly, our future results will partly depend on our ability to maintain positive working relationships with, and offer competitive terms to, our international manufacturers. If supply issues cause us to be unable to provide products consistent with our standards or manufacture our footwear in an efficient and cost-effective manner, our customers may cancel orders, refuse to accept deliveries or demand reductions in purchase prices, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
We are reliant upon our information technology systems, and any major disruption of these systems could adversely impact our ability to effectively operate our business.
Our computer network and systems are essential to all aspects of our operations, including design, pricing, production, accounting, reporting, forecasting, ordering, manufacturing, transportation, sales and distribution. Our ability to manage and maintain our inventory and to deliver products in a timely manner depends on these systems. With the continued growth in direct-to-consumer sales on our e-commerce sites, any system disruption may result in an adverse impact to our operations. If any of these systems fails to operate as expected, we experience problems with transitioning to upgraded or replacement systems, a breach in security occurs or a natural disaster interrupts system functions, we may experience delays in product fulfillment, reduced efficiency in our operations, or delays in reporting our financial results to investors, or we may be required to expend significant capital to correct the problem, which may have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
A cybersecurity breach may adversely affect our sales and reputation.
We routinely possess sensitive consumer and associate information and periodically provide it to third parties for analysis, benefit distribution or compliance purposes. Additionally, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, a large portion of our Corporate employees are working remotely, which may result in heightened cybersecurity risk. Remote working environments may be less secure and more susceptible to hacking attacks, including phishing and social engineering attempts that seek to exploit the COVID-19 pandemic. While we believe we have taken reasonable and appropriate steps to protect that information, hackers and data thieves operate sophisticated, large-scale attacks that could breach our information systems, despite ongoing security measures. In addition, we are required to comply with increasingly complex regulations designed to protect our business and personal data. Any breach of our network security, a third-party’s network security or failure to comply with applicable regulations may result in (a) the loss of valuable business data and/or our consumers’ or associates’ personal information, (b) increased costs associated with implementing additional protections and processes, (c) a disruption of our business and a loss of sales, (d) negative media attention, (e) damage to our consumer and associate relationships and reputation, and (f) fines or lawsuits.
16
Our operating results depend on preparing accurate sales forecasts and properly managing our inventory levels.
Using sales forecasts, we place orders with manufacturers for some of our products prior to the time we receive all of our customers’ orders to minimize purchasing costs, the time necessary to fill customer orders and the risk of non-delivery. We also maintain an inventory of certain products that we anticipate will be in greater demand. At the retail level, we place orders for products many months in advance of our key selling seasons. Adverse economic conditions and rapidly changing consumer preferences can make it difficult for us and our retail customers to accurately forecast product trends in order to match production with demand. If we fail to accurately assess consumer fashion tastes and the impact of economic factors on consumer spending or to effectively differentiate our retail and wholesale offerings, our inventory levels may exceed customer demand, resulting in inventory write-downs, higher carrying costs, lower gross margins or the sale of excess inventory at discounted prices, which could significantly impact our financial results. Conversely, if we underestimate consumer demand for our products or if our manufacturers fail to supply the quality products that we require in a timely manner, we may experience inventory shortages. Inventory shortages may delay shipments to customers (and possibly require us to offer discounts or costly expedited shipping), negatively impact retailer and distributor relationships, adversely impact our sales results and diminish brand awareness and loyalty. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in lower sales during 2020, and lower sales projections. The full impact of the pandemic and its impact on consumer sentiment is difficult to estimate.
A disruption in the effective functioning of our distribution centers could adversely affect our ability to deliver inventory on a timely basis.
We currently use several leased distribution centers, which serve as the source of replenishment of inventory for our footwear stores and e-commerce websites operated by our Famous Footwear and Brand Portfolio segments and serve the wholesale operations of our Brand Portfolio segment. Our success depends on our ability to handle the rapid consumer shift to online shopping and single pair shipments, which requires significant capital to operate with a greater level of sophistication and automation, as well as higher processing and distribution costs. We may be unable to successfully manage, negotiate or renew our distribution center leases, or we may experience complications with respect to our distribution centers, such as substantial damage to, or destruction of, such facilities due to natural disasters or ineffective information technology systems. In such an event, our other distribution centers may not be able to support the resulting additional distribution demands and we may be unable to locate alternative persons or entities capable of fulfilling our distribution needs, resulting in an adverse effect on our ability to deliver inventory on a timely basis. The COVID-19 pandemic has also adversely impacted the effective operation of our distribution centers as a result of temporary retail store closures, labor shortages as a result of government mandates to stop the spread of the virus, and disruptions to the supply chain.
Our success depends on our ability to retain senior management and recruit and retain other key associates.
Our success depends on our ability to attract, retain and motivate qualified management, administrative, product development and sales personnel to support existing operations and future growth. In addition, our ability to successfully integrate acquired businesses often depends on our ability to retain incumbent personnel, many of whom possess valuable institutional knowledge and operating experience. Competition for qualified personnel in the footwear industry is intense and we compete for these individuals with other companies that in many cases have superior financial and other resources. The loss of the services of any member of our senior management or key associates, the inability to attract and retain other qualified personnel or the inability to effectively transition positions could adversely affect the sales, design and production of our products as well as the implementation of our strategic initiatives.
If we are unable to maintain working relationships with our major branded suppliers, our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows may be adversely impacted.
Our Famous Footwear segment purchases a substantial portion of its footwear products from major branded suppliers. Products purchased from three key third-party suppliers (Nike, Skechers and adidas) represented approximately 25% of consolidated net sales. As is common in the industry, we do not have any long-term contracts with our suppliers. In addition, the success of our financial performance is dependent on the ability of our Famous Footwear segment to obtain products from our suppliers on a timely basis and on acceptable terms. While we believe our relationships with our current suppliers are good, the loss of any of our major suppliers or product developed exclusively for our Famous Footwear stores could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, negative trends in global economic conditions may adversely impact our suppliers. If these third parties do not perform their
17
obligations or are unable to provide us with the materials and services we need at prices and terms that are acceptable to us, our ability to meet our consumers’ demand could be adversely affected.
Our retail business depends on our ability to secure affordable and desirable leased locations without creating a competitive concentration of stores.
The success of the retail business within our Famous Footwear and Brand Portfolio segments depends, in part, on our ability to secure affordable, long-term leases in desirable locations for our leased retail footwear stores and to secure renewals of such leases. As consumer shopping preferences have evolved, we continue to focus on opening stores in locations with a greater penetration of high-value consumers. No assurance can be given that we will be able to successfully negotiate lease renewals for existing stores or obtain acceptable terms for new stores in desirable locations. In addition, opening new stores in our existing markets may result in reduced net sales in existing stores as our stores become more concentrated in the markets we serve. As a result, the number of consumers and financial performance of individual stores may decline and the average sales per square foot at our stores may be reduced. Due to the changing retail landscape, we may want to reduce the number of retail store locations but may be unable to successfully exit lease agreements. This may result in impairments or lease termination charges that adversely impact our financial results.
Damage to our reputation or brands may negatively impact our business
Our ability to maintain our reputation is integral to the success of our business. Failure to maintain quality merchandise and quality customer service may damage our reputation. The consumer’s perception of us, our stores and our brands, whether justified or not, could harm our reputation. Our success depends, in part, on our ability to keep existing consumers while also attracting new consumers and a damaged reputation will hinder that ability.
In addition, the increased use of social media by us and by our consumer has also increased the risk to our reputation. Negative commentary regarding us or the products we sell may be posted on social media at any time. Consumers value readily available information and may rely on negative commentary without regard to its accuracy. If we are unable to effectively manage social media, our reputation and consumer’s perception of our brands may be negatively impacted. Damage to our brands and reputation could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flow.
A significant portion of our Famous Footwear sales are dependent on our Famous Footwear loyalty program, Famously You Rewards ("Rewards"), and any decrease in sales from Rewards could have a material adverse impact on our sales.
Rewards is a customer loyalty program that drives sales and traffic for the Famous Footwear segment. Rewards members earn points toward savings certificates for qualifying purchases. Upon reaching specified point values, members are issued a savings certificate, which may be redeemed for purchases at Famous Footwear. Approximately 79% of our 2020 sales within the Famous Footwear segment were generated by our Rewards members. If our Rewards members do not continue to shop at Famous Footwear, our sales may be adversely affected.
Transitional challenges with acquisitions and divestitures could result in unexpected expenditures of time and resources.
As part of our business strategy, we periodically pursue acquisitions of other companies or businesses, such as our 2018 acquisitions of Blowfish Malibu and Vionic, as further discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, as well as divestitures of our businesses, such as the exit of the vast majority of our Naturalizer retail locations. Although we review the records of acquisition candidates, the review may not reveal all existing or potential problems. As a result, we may not accurately assess the value of the business and may, accordingly, ultimately assume unknown adverse operating conditions and/or unanticipated expenses and liabilities related to the acquisition. Acquisitions may also cause us to incur debt, write-offs of goodwill or intangible assets if the business does not perform as well as expected and substantial amortization expenses associated with other intangible assets. We face the risk that the returns on acquisitions will not support the expenditures or indebtedness incurred to acquire or launch such businesses. We also face the risk that we will not be able to integrate acquisitions into our existing operations or divest our businesses effectively without substantial expense, delay or other operational or financial problems. Integration may be hindered by, among other things, differing procedures, including internal controls, business practices and technology systems. We may need to allocate more management resources to integration than we planned, which may adversely affect our ability to pursue other profitable activities.
18
TAX, LEGAL, AND REGULATORY RISKS
Changes in tax laws may result in increased volatility in our effective tax rates.
Our financial results are significantly impacted by the effective tax rates of both our domestic and international operations. Future changes in tax laws, including income tax changes proposed by the new presidential administration, combined with the current political environment created by a change of control in Congress, could materially impact our effective tax rate. Our effective income tax rate could also be adversely affected by certain provisions of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Act"), which was enacted in December 2017, that directly affect international earnings, such as the global intangible low-taxed income tax ("GILTI") and base-erosion and anti-abuse tax provisions ("BEAT"). Other factors, such as changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in permitted deductions, interpretations, policies and treaties and the outcome of income tax audits in various jurisdictions, may result in higher taxes, lower profitability and increased volatility in our financial results.
Our business, sales and brand value could be harmed by violations of labor, trade or other laws.
We focus on doing business with those suppliers who share our commitment to responsible business practices and the principles set forth in our Production Code of Conduct (the “PCOC”). By requiring our suppliers to comply with the PCOC, we encourage our suppliers to promote best practices and work toward continual improvement throughout their production operations. The PCOC sets forth standards for working conditions and other matters, including compliance with applicable labor practices, workplace environment and compliance with laws. Although we promote ethical business practices, we do not control our suppliers or their labor practices. A failure by any of our suppliers to adhere to these standards or laws could cause us to incur additional costs for our products or cause negative publicity and harm our business and reputation. We also require our suppliers to meet our standards for product safety, including compliance with applicable laws and standards with respect to safety issues, including lead content in paint. Failure by any of our suppliers to adhere to product safety standards could lead to a product recall, which may result in critical media coverage, harm our business and reputation, and cause us to incur additional costs.
In addition, if we, or our suppliers or international manufacturers, violate United States or international trade laws or regulations, we may be subject to additional duties, significant monetary penalties, the seizure and forfeiture of the products we are attempting to import or the loss of our import privileges. Possible violations of United States or international laws or regulations could include inadequate record keeping of our imported products, misstatements or errors as to the origin, classification, marketing or valuation of our imported products, fraudulent visas or labor violations. The effects of these factors could render our conduct of business in a particular country undesirable or impractical and have a negative impact on our operating results.
Our reputation and competitive position are dependent on our ability to license well-recognized brands, license our own brands under successful licensing arrangements and protect our intellectual property rights.
Licenses - Company as Licensee
Although we own most of our wholesale brands, we also rely on our ability to attract, retain and maintain good relationships with licensors that have strong, well-recognized brands and trade names. Our license agreements are generally for an initial term of two to four years, subject to renewal, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to renew these licenses. Even our longer-term or renewable licenses are typically dependent upon our ability to market and sell the licensed products at specified levels, and the failure to meet such levels may result in the termination or non-renewal of such licenses. Furthermore, many of our license agreements require minimum royalty payments, and if we are unable to generate sufficient sales and profitability to cover these minimum royalty requirements, we may be required to make additional payments to the licensors that could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. In addition, because certain of our license agreements are non-exclusive, new or existing competitors may obtain licenses with overlapping product or geographic terms, resulting in increased competition for a particular market.
Licenses - Company as Licensor
We have entered into numerous license agreements with respect to the brands and trade names that we own. While we have significant control over our licensees’ products and advertising, we generally cannot control their operational and financial issues. If our licensees are not able to meet annual sales and royalty goals, obtain financing, manage their supply chain, control quality and maintain positive relationships with their customers, our business, results of operations and financial position may be adversely affected. While we would likely have the ability to terminate an underperforming
19
license, it may be difficult and costly to locate an acceptable substitute distributor or licensee, and we may experience a disruption in our sales and brand visibility. In addition, although many of our license agreements prohibit the licensees from entering into licensing arrangements with certain of our competitors, they are generally not prohibited from offering, under other brands, the types of products covered by their license agreements with us.
Trademarks
We believe that our trademarks and trade names are important to our success and competitive position because our distinctive marks create a market for our products and distinguish our products from other products. We cannot, however, guarantee that we will be able to secure protection for our intellectual property in the future or that such protection will be adequate for future operations. Furthermore, we face the risk of ineffective protection of intellectual property rights in jurisdictions where we source and distribute our products, some of which do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the United States. If we are unsuccessful in challenging a party’s products on the basis of infringement of our intellectual property rights, continued sales of these products could adversely affect our sales, devalue our brands and result in a shift in consumer preference away from our products. We may face significant expenses and liability in connection with the protection of our intellectual property rights, and if we are unable to successfully protect our rights or resolve intellectual property conflicts with others, our business or financial condition could be adversely affected.
We are subject to periodic litigation and other regulatory proceedings, which could result in the unexpected expenditure of time and resources.
We are a defendant from time to time in lawsuits and regulatory actions (including environmental matters) relating to our business and to our past operations. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation and regulatory proceedings, we cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome of any such proceedings. An unfavorable outcome could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, regardless of the outcome of any litigation or regulatory proceedings, such proceedings are expensive and will require that we devote substantial resources and executive time to defend, thereby diverting management’s attention and resources that are needed to successfully run our business. See Item 3, Legal Proceedings, for further discussion of pending matters.
LIQUIDITY RISKS
Our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be adversely affected by the failure of financial institutions to fulfill their commitments under our Credit Agreement.
The Fourth Amendment to our Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”), which matures on January 18, 2024, is provided by a syndicate of financial institutions, with each institution agreeing severally (and not jointly) to make revolving credit loans to us in an aggregate amount of up to $600.0 million in accordance with the terms of the Credit Agreement. In addition, the Credit Agreement provides for an increase at the Company’s option by up to $150.0 million. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, many companies are relying on bank funding for working capital needs. If one or more of the financial institutions participating in the Credit Agreement were to default on its obligation to fund its commitment, the portion of the facility provided by such defaulting financial institution may not be available to us.
If we are unable to maintain our credit rating, our ability to access capital and interest rates may be negatively impacted.
The credit rating agencies periodically review our capital structure and the quality and stability of our earnings. Any negative ratings actions, such as the downgrades of our credit rating by Moody’s and S&P in 2020, could constrain the capital available to us or our industry and could limit our access to long-term funding or cause such access to be available at a higher borrowing cost for our operations. We are dependent upon our ability to access capital at rates and on terms we determine to be attractive. If our ability to access capital becomes constrained, our interest expense will likely increase, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, as of January 30, 2021, total borrowing availability under the Credit Agreement was $136.0 million. Failure to meet our debt covenants under the Credit Agreement may require the Company to seek waivers or amendments of the debt covenants, alternative or additional sources of financing or reduce expenditures.
20
ITEM 1BUNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
There are no unresolved written comments that were received from the SEC staff 180 days or more before the end of our fiscal year relating to our periodic or current reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
ITEM 2PROPERTIES
We own our principal executive, sales and administrative offices located in Clayton (“St. Louis”), Missouri.
Our retail operations, included in both our Famous Footwear and Brand Portfolio segments, are conducted throughout the United States, Canada, China and Guam and involve the operation of 1,086 shoe stores, including 72 in Canada. All store locations, excluding our Perth, Ontario outlet store, are leased, with approximately 40% of them having renewal options. The footwear sold through our domestic wholesale business is primarily processed through our leased distribution centers in Chino, California and Lebanon, Tennessee.
The following table summarizes the location and general use of the Company’s primary properties:
Location
Owned/Leased
Segment
Use
Clayton, Missouri
Owned
Famous Footwear and Brand Portfolio
Principal corporate, executive, sales and administrative offices
United States, Canada, China and Guam
Leased
Retail operations
Chino, California (1)
Brand Portfolio
Distribution centers
Lebanon, Tennessee (2)
Distribution center
Lebec, California (3)
Famous Footwear
New York, New York
Office space and showrooms
Perth, Ontario (4)
Distribution center and outlet center
San Rafael and Culver City, California
Office space
Dongguan, China
Office space and sample-making facility
Santiago, Dominican Republic
Manufacturing facility
Port Washington, Wisconsin
Manufacturing and recrafting facility and office space
We also own a building in Denver, Colorado, which is leased to a third party, and undeveloped land in Colorado and New York. See Item 3, Legal Proceedings, for further discussion of certain of these properties.
ITEM 3LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are involved in legal proceedings and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the outcome of such ordinary course business proceedings and litigation currently pending will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position.
Our prior operations included numerous manufacturing and other facilities for which we may have responsibility under various environmental laws to address conditions that may be identified in the future. We are involved in environmental remediation and ongoing compliance activities at several sites and have been notified that we are or may be a potentially responsible party at several other sites. We are remediating, under the oversight of Colorado authorities, contamination at and beneath our owned facility in Colorado (also known as the “Redfield” site) and groundwater and indoor air in
residential neighborhoods adjacent to and near the property, which have been affected by solvents previously used at the site and surrounding facilities.
Refer to Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to the Redfield matter and other legal proceedings.
ITEM 4MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
ITEM 5MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the trading symbol “CAL.” As of January 30, 2021, we had 3,330 shareholders of record.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table provides information relating to our repurchases of common stock during the fourth quarter of 2020:
Total Number of
Maximum Number
Shares Purchased
of Shares that May
Total Number
Average Price
as Part of Publicly
Yet Be Purchased
Fiscal
of Shares
Paid per
Publicly Announced
Purchased Under
Period
Purchased (1)
Share (1)
Program (2)
the Program (2)
November 1, 2020 - November 28, 2020
2,164
$
12.22
—
2,651,489
November 29, 2020 - January 2, 2021
2,431
12.71
January 3, 2021 - January 30, 2021
4,595
12.48
Stock Performance Graph
The following performance graph compares the cumulative total return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of the following indices: (i) the S&P© SmallCap 600 Stock Index and (ii) a peer group of companies believed to be engaged in similar businesses. Our peer group consists of Designer Brands, Inc., Genesco, Inc., Shoe Carnival, Inc., Skechers U.S.A., Inc., Steven Madden, Ltd. and Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest to each January 31. Accordingly, share prices are as of the last business day in each fiscal year. The graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and each index was $100 at January 30, 2016. The graph also assumes that all dividends were reinvested and that investments were held through January 30, 2021. These indices are included for comparative purposes only and do not necessarily reflect management’s opinion that such indices are an appropriate measure of the relative performance of the stock involved and are not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance of the common stock.
*$100 invested on January 30, 2016 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. Index calculated on daily basis.
1/30/2016
1/28/2017
2/3/2018
2/2/2019
2/1/2020
1/30/2021
Caleres, Inc.
100.00
111.82
109.26
113.36
68.03
61.17
Peer Group
99.94
129.21
124.89
133.13
123.26
S&P© SmallCap 600 Stock Index
135.00
154.01
154.55
164.80
202.99
ITEM 6SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected financial data previously required by Item 301 of Regulation S-K has been omitted in reliance on SEC Release No. 33-10890.
ITEM 7MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
Business Overview
We are a global footwear company that operates retail shoe stores and e-commerce websites, and designs, develops, sources, and distributes footwear for people of all ages. Our mission is to inspire people to feel great...feet first. We offer the consumer a powerful portfolio of footwear brands built on deep consumer insights generating unwavering consumer loyalty and trust. As both a retailer and a wholesaler, we have a perspective on the marketplace that enables us to serve consumers from different vantage points. We believe our diversified business model provides us with synergies by spanning consumer segments, categories and distribution channels. A combination of thoughtful planning and rigorous execution is key to our success in optimizing our business and portfolio of brands. Our business strategy is focused on
continued market share gains, investments in technology, and sustainability, while remaining focused on meeting changing consumer demand.
Our Famous Footwear segment includes our Famous Footwear stores, famousfootwear.com and famousfootwear.ca in Canada. Famous Footwear is one of America’s leading family–branded footwear retailers with 916 stores at the end of 2020 and net sales of $1.3 billion in 2020. Our focus for the Famous Footwear segment is on meeting the needs of a well-defined consumer by providing an assortment of trend-right, brand-name fashion, casual and athletic footwear at a great price.
Our Brand Portfolio segment is consumer-focused and we believe our success is dependent upon our ability to strengthen consumers’ preference for our brands by offering compelling style, quality, differentiated brand promises and innovative marketing campaigns. The segment is comprised of the Naturalizer, Vionic, Sam Edelman, Dr. Scholl’s Shoes, Blowfish Malibu, Allen Edmonds, LifeStride, Franco Sarto, Rykä, Vince, Bzees, Zodiac, Via Spiga and Veronica Beard brands. Through these brands, we offer our customers a diversified selection of footwear, each designed and targeted to a specific consumer segment within the marketplace. We are able to showcase many of our brands in our retail stores and online, leveraging our wholesale and retail platforms, sharing consumer insights across our businesses and testing new and innovative products. Our Brand Portfolio segment operates 170 retail stores in the United States, Canada, China and Guam for our Naturalizer, Allen Edmonds and Sam Edelman brands. This segment also includes our e-commerce businesses that sell our branded footwear. We also operate a joint venture, which expands our international presence by distributing our Naturalizer and Sam Edelman brands in China.
COVID-19 Pandemic
The United States and global economies continue to be adversely affected by the coronavirus (“COVID-19”), which was declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization in March 2020. During the first half of 2020, our retail stores were temporarily closed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. We took decisive actions to mitigate the adverse impact of the pandemic, including the following:
In addition, as a precautionary measure to increase our cash position and preserve financial flexibility given the uncertainty in the United States and global markets resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, we increased the borrowings on our revolving credit facility from $275.0 million at February 1, 2020 to $440.0 million in March 2020. We have made significant progress repaying the incremental borrowings from March, with total net repayments of $188.5 million since the end of the first quarter of 2020, reducing overall indebtedness to a level lower than the onset of the pandemic.
Although we have reopened all of our retail stores from the temporary store closures in the first half of 2020, our business results were negatively impacted in 2020 by the COVID-19 pandemic and continue to be impacted. Many of our stores have reduced operating hours and have experienced declines in foot traffic with stay-at-home orders and other government
mandates, which resulted in lower sales in 2020, despite the robust growth of our e-commerce business. In addition, a small number of stores have experienced additional closure days on a temporary basis, due to local government mandates or illness.
We believe we are better positioned and prepared to manage through this period as a result of the actions we took during 2020. However, the depth and duration of the pandemic and its impact on overall consumer confidence and spending is uncertain. While vaccination efforts are currently underway, we continue to experience disruption to our business, and expect that our 2021 financial results will continue to be adversely affected. The extent and duration of COVID-19 on our financial performance depends on many factors outside of our control, including actions taken by government officials, the pace of vaccination efforts and the introduction or spread of any COVID-19 variants.
Recent Developments – Brand Portfolio Retail Store Closings
During the fourth quarter of 2020, we announced the decision to close all but a limited number of our Naturalizer retail stores. During 2020, we closed 60 Naturalizer retail stores and anticipate the remaining 73 scheduled store closures to be completed by the end of the first quarter of 2021. Refer to further discussion below regarding the costs we incurred in 2020 associated with the store closures.
Financial Highlights
The following is a summary of the financial highlights for 2020:
The following items should be considered in evaluating the comparability of our 2020 and 2019 results:
25
Financial Outlook
While the pace of recovery is still uncertain, there are signs of stabilization in the marketplace. We believe we are well-positioned to capitalize as the market resumes its upward trajectory and the world returns to a greater degree of normalcy. As we plan for future success, we will focus on maintaining our strong momentum at Famous Footwear; driving enhanced consumer alignment and improved performance in the Brand Portfolio segment; taking a careful and disciplined approach to cost control and capital spending; reducing debt levels still further; and returning excess cash to shareholders. We are a more agile and focused organization than we were at the start of 2020, with an even more vigorous commitment to connecting with our consumers and providing them with compelling and fresh product. We are confident that we can leverage our talented and dedicated workforce, strong operating platform, powerful portfolio and improved financial position to capitalize on the opportunities we see ahead in order to drive long-term value for our shareholders.
26
Metrics Used in the Evaluation of Our Business
The following are a couple of key metrics by which we evaluate our business and make strategic decisions:
Same-store sales
The same-store sales metric is a metric commonly used in the retail industry to evaluate the revenue generated for stores that have been open for more than a year, though many retailers may calculate the metric differently. Management uses the same-store sales metric as a measure of an individual store’s success to determine whether it is performing consistent with expectations. Our same-store sales metric is a daily-weighted calculation for the period, which includes sales for stores that have been open at least 13 months. In addition, in order to be included in the same-store sales metric, a store must be open in the current period as well as the corresponding day(s) of the comparable retail calendar in the prior year. Accordingly, closed stores (whether temporary or permanent closures) are excluded from the same-store sales metric for each day of the closure. Relocated stores are treated as new stores and therefore excluded from the calculation. E-commerce sales for those websites that function as an extension of a retail chain are included in the same-store sales calculation. We believe the same-store sales metric is useful to shareholders and investors in assessing our retail stores performance of existing locations with comparable prior year sales, separate from the impact of store openings or closures.
Beginning in mid-March 2020, all of our Famous Footwear and Brand Portfolio stores in North America were temporarily closed and we began a phased reopening of retail stores in mid-May. As discussed above, our same-store sales calculation excludes the impact of both permanent and temporary store closures. In addition to the temporary store closures during the first half of 2020, we experienced temporary closures of certain stores during the second half of 2020 related to illness, weather, fires, civil unrest and local government mandates. Accordingly, our same-store sales calculation is impacted more heavily by our e-commerce sales penetration, which was higher than in prior periods, reflecting strong growth in that channel and that our e-commerce sites operated continuously throughout 2020.
Sales per square foot
The sales per square foot metric is commonly used in the retail industry to calculate the efficiency of sales based upon the square footage in a store. Management uses the sales per square foot metric as a measure of an individual store’s success to determine whether it is performing consistent with expectations. The sales per square foot metric is calculated by dividing total retail store sales, excluding e-commerce sales, by the total square footage of the retail store base at the end of each month of the respective period. This metric was adversely impacted by the temporary retail store closures during 2020 and therefore, the metric is not comparable to 2019.
Comparison of Financial Results
The following sections discuss the consolidated and segment results of our operations for the year ended January 30, 2021 compared to the year ended February 1, 2020. For a discussion of the year ended February 1, 2020 compared to the year ended February 2, 2019, refer to Part II, Item 7 "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 1, 2020.
27
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS
% of
($ millions)
Net Sales
Net sales
2,117.1
100.0
2,921.6
2,834.8
Cost of goods sold
1,330.1
62.8
1,737.2
59.5
1,678.5
59.2
Gross profit
787.0
37.2
1,184.4
40.5
1,156.3
40.8
Selling and administrative expenses
889.5
42.0
1,065.8
36.5
1,041.8
36.7
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets
286.5
13.5
98.0
3.5
Restructuring and other special charges, net
96.7
4.6
14.8
0.4
16.1
Operating (loss) earnings
(485.7)
(22.9)
103.8
3.6
0.0
Interest expense, net
(48.2)
(2.3)
(33.1)
(1.2)
(18.3)
(0.6)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
(0.2)
(0.0)
Other income, net
16.8
0.8
7.9
0.3
12.3
(Loss) earnings before income taxes
(517.1)
(24.4)
78.6
2.7
(5.8)
Income tax benefit (provision)
78.1
3.7
(16.5)
Net (loss) earnings
(439.0)
(20.7)
62.1
2.1
(5.5)
Net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
0.1
(0.7)
(0.1)
Net (loss) earnings attributable to Caleres, Inc.
(439.1)
(5.4)
Net sales decreased $804.5 million, or 27.5%, to $2,117.1 million in 2020, compared to $2,921.6 million last year. We experienced lower sales across both of our segments, as the COVID-19 pandemic drove the temporary closure of all of our retail stores in North America and softened demand for dress footwear categories. In addition, many of our wholesale customers were adversely affected by the pandemic and canceled orders as a result of the temporary closure of their retail stores. These factors resulted in a $504.0 million, or 35.8% decrease in net sales for our Brand Portfolio segment and a $324.5 million, or 20.4% decrease in net sales for our Famous Footwear segment. Despite the closure of our retail stores and ongoing impact of the pandemic throughout 2020, we experienced strong growth in our e-commerce business. Our Famous Footwear e-commerce net sales increased approximately 75% in 2020. The investments we made in our e-commerce and logistics capabilities positioned us to capitalize on the accelerating shift to online purchasing, driving consolidated e-commerce penetration to approximately 30% of net sales, compared to 20% last year.
Gross Profit
Gross profit decreased $397.4 million, or 33.5%, to $787.0 million in 2020, compared to $1,184.4 million in 2019 driven by lower net sales, higher freight expenses and incremental inventory markdowns reflecting the difficult retail environment in 2020, and our business exits described earlier. Cost of goods sold in 2019 includes $5.8 million related to the amortization of the inventory fair value adjustment required by purchase accounting from our Vionic acquisition and $3.0 million of incremental cost of goods sold associated with the decision to exit our Carlos brand and reposition our Via Spiga brand. As a percentage of net sales, our gross profit rate decreased to 37.2% in 2020, compared to 40.5% in 2019. The lower gross profit rate reflects declines at both the Brand Portfolio and Famous Footwear segments as a result of the incremental inventory markdowns, a more promotional retail environment and higher e-commerce sales volume. Our e-commerce sales generally result in lower margins than traditional retail sales as a result of the incremental freight expenses.
We classify warehousing, distribution, sourcing and other inventory procurement costs in selling and administrative expenses. Accordingly, our gross profit and selling and administrative expenses, as a percentage of net sales, may not be comparable to other companies.
Selling and Administrative Expenses
Selling and administrative expenses decreased $176.3 million, or 16.5%, to $889.5 million in 2020, compared to $1,065.8 million last year. Throughout 2020, we increased our focus on the management of our controllable expenses in response to the difficult business environment and lower sales volume. The decrease reflects lower salaries and benefits expense; lower variable expenses associated with the temporary retail store closures, including the impact of certain rent concessions received from landlords; and lower marketing, travel and logistics expenses. As a percentage of net sales, selling and administrative expenses increased to 42.0% in 2020 from 36.5% last year.
28
Impairment of Goodwill and Intangible Assets
During 2020, we recorded non-cash impairment charges totaling $286.5 million ($236.4 million on an after-tax basis, or $6.35 per diluted share). We recorded $240.3 million of impairment associated with goodwill as a result of the unfavorable business climate and our lower market capitalization. In addition, we recorded $46.2 million of impairment associated with intangible assets, including $36.0 million associated with the Allen Edmonds trade name and customer relationship intangible asset and $10.2 million associated with the Via Spiga trade name. There were no corresponding impairment charges in 2019. Refer to Note 1 and Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to these charges.
Restructuring and Other Special Charges, Net
Restructuring and other special charges of $96.7 million were incurred in 2020, compared to $14.8 million in 2019, as follows:
The nature of the above charges are more fully described in the Financial Highlights section above and Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements.
Operating (Loss) Earnings
Operating (loss) earnings decreased $589.5 million to an operating loss of $485.7 million in 2020, compared to operating earnings of $103.8 million last year, primarily reflecting the lower net sales and higher impairment and restructuring charges described above. As a percentage of net sales, the operating loss was 22.9% in 2020, compared to operating earnings of 3.6% in 2019.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net increased $15.1 million, or 45.8%, to $48.2 million in 2020, compared to $33.1 million last year, which primarily reflects the higher fair value adjustment to the mandatory purchase obligation associated with the Blowfish Malibu acquisition of $23.9 million in 2020, compared to fair value adjustments and accretion totaling $6.0 million in 2019. This increase was partially offset by lower average borrowings under our revolving credit agreement. We anticipate interest expense to remain higher in 2021 than historical levels as we continue to pay down the revolving credit agreement. The Blowfish Malibu mandatory purchase obligation will be remeasured each quarter until the anticipated settlement in the third quarter of 2021. Refer to Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to our borrowings and Note 15 for additional information related to the mandatory purchase obligation.
Other Income, Net
Other income, net increased $8.9 million, or 113.0%, to $16.8 million in 2020, compared to $7.9 million in 2019, reflecting an increase in income from our qualified pension plans. This increase was primarily driven by a higher expected return on assets and lower discount rate for our domestic pension plans in 2020, as well as lower pension settlement costs. Refer to Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to our retirement plans.
Income Tax Benefit (Provision)
Our consolidated effective tax rate was 15.1% in 2020, compared to 21.0% in 2019. In 2020, our effective tax rate was impacted by several discrete tax items, including the non-deductibility of a portion of our intangible asset impairment charges and the incremental tax provision related to the vesting of stock awards. Our tax benefit also includes the favorable impact of approximately $8.2 million related to the CARES Act, which permits us to carry back a significant portion of
29
our 2020 losses to years with a higher federal tax rate. In addition, due to the significance of our 2020 loss before income taxes, the Company is in a three-year cumulative loss position for federal, state and certain international jurisdictions. We increased our valuation allowances on deferred tax assets to $50.0 million during 2020, reflecting the uncertainty regarding the utilization of our deferred tax assets in these jurisdictions. In 2019, our effective tax rate was impacted by discrete tax benefits totaling $1.4 million, primarily reflecting adjustments to tax rates in state and other international jurisdictions. The effective tax rate in 2019 was also impacted by a higher mix of international earnings, as our international earnings are generally subject to lower tax rates. Refer to Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding income taxes.
Net (Loss) Earnings Attributable to Caleres, Inc.
Consolidated net loss attributable to Caleres, Inc. was $439.1 million in 2020, compared to net income of $62.8 million last year, reflecting the factors described above.
Geographic Results
We have both domestic and international operations. Domestic operations include the nationwide operation of our Famous Footwear and other branded retail footwear stores, the wholesale distribution of footwear to numerous retail consumers and the operation of our e-commerce websites. International operations primarily consist of wholesale operations in Eastern Asia, Canada and Europe, retail operations in Canada and China and the operation of our international e-commerce websites. In addition, we license certain of our trade names to third parties who distribute and/or operate retail locations internationally. The operations in Eastern Asia include first-cost transactions, where footwear is sold at international ports to customers who then import the footwear into the United States and other countries. The breakdown of domestic and international net sales and earnings before income taxes is as follows:
Earnings
Loss Before
Earnings Before
(Loss) Before
Income Taxes
Domestic
1,981.1
(441.5)
2,727.1
37.3
2,656.9
40.0
International
136.0
(75.6)
194.5
41.3
177.9
(45.8)
As a percentage of sales, the pre-tax profitability on international sales is higher than on domestic sales because of a lower cost structure and the inclusion of the unallocated corporate administrative and other costs in domestic earnings. In 2020, both our domestic and international earnings were impacted by the goodwill and trade name impairment charges described earlier. Our international earnings were impacted in 2018 by the goodwill and trade name impairment charges for our Allen Edmonds business.
30
($ millions, except sales per square foot)
1,263.6
1,588.1
1,606.8
773.7
61.2
912.7
57.5
916.0
57.0
489.9
38.8
675.4
42.5
690.8
43.0
497.1
39.4
595.0
37.5
605.1
37.7
16.6
1.3
0.2
(23.8)
(1.9)
76.9
4.8
85.3
5.3
Key Metrics
Same-store sales % change
1.6
2.0
1.5
Same-store sales $ change
20.0
31.1
23.8
Sales change from 53rd week
(19.7)
Sales change from new and closed stores, net
(344.4)
(49.3)
(34.5)
Impact of changes in Canadian exchange rate on sales
(0.5)
(0.4)
Sales per square foot, excluding e-commerce
159
223
220
Square footage, end of year (thousand sq. ft.)
6,074
6,281
6,552
Stores opened
Stores closed
39
55
Ending stores
Net sales decreased $324.5 million, or 20.4%, to $1,263.6 million in 2020, compared to $1,588.1 million last year. The sales decrease was primarily driven by the temporary closure of all Famous Footwear stores during the first half of 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the ongoing impact of the pandemic for the second half of 2020. During the period of temporary store closures, Famous Footwear continued to serve customers through its e-commerce business. Even as the retail stores began to open in the second quarter of 2020, our e-commerce business remained strong, generating a 75% increase in sales for 2020, with e-commerce penetration rising to approximately 22% of net sales, from 10% in 2019. In both our brick and mortar and e-commerce channels, we experienced strong sales of athletics and casual styles, as the consumer adjusted to their work-from-home environment and limited social gatherings. This sales trend was partially offset by weakness in demand for dress footwear. Since the beginning of 2018, we have had net closures of 110 stores, or approximately 11%, as we continue to focus on optimizing our store base, and eliminating underperforming locations, particularly given the consumer shift to online shopping.
Sales to members of our customer loyalty program, Famously You Rewards ("Rewards"), continue to account for a majority of the segment’s sales, with approximately 79% of net sales to loyalty program members in 2020, compared to 78% in 2019. We continue to make improvements in digital technology in an effort to grow our Rewards program and drive increased engagement, conversion and retention. In January 2021, we upgraded our famousfootwear.com e-commerce platform and launched a new version of the Famous Footwear Rewards mobile application. The newly launched famousfootwear.com platform adds optimized mobile capabilities to deliver a superior experience for the 80% of our online shoppers who visit our site on a mobile device.
Gross profit decreased $185.5 million, or 27.5%, to $489.9 million in 2020, compared to $675.4 million in 2019, reflecting lower net sales, higher freight expenses associated with the growth in our e-commerce business and higher inventory markdowns as a result of the difficult retail environment. As a percentage of net sales, our gross profit rate decreased to 38.8% in 2020, compared to 42.5% in 2019, driven by the impact of increased promotional activity to drive sales volume, higher freight expenses and the incremental inventory markdowns. We expect the trend toward a higher mix of e-commerce sales to continue, further leveraging the investment we have made in our e-commerce platform.
Selling and administrative expenses decreased $97.9 million, or 16.5%, to $497.1 million during 2020 compared to $595.0 million last year. The decrease was driven primarily by lower salaries expense attributable to the actions taken to mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic during the period of temporary retail store closures, as well as lower
31
variable expenses associated with the temporary retail store closures, including certain rent reductions and lease concessions. As a percentage of net sales, selling and administrative expenses increased to 39.4% in 2020 from 37.5% last year.
Restructuring and other special charges were $16.6 million during 2020, consisting primarily of impairment charges on furniture and fixtures in our retail stores and lease right-of-use assets. In 2019, we incurred restructuring and other special charges of $3.5 million related to expense containment initiatives. Refer to Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to these charges.
Operating (loss) earnings decreased $100.7 million to an operating loss of $23.8 million for 2020, compared to operating earnings of $76.9 million last year, reflecting lower net sales, a decline in gross profit rate and the other factors described above. As a percentage of net sales, the operating loss was 1.9% for 2020, compared to operating earnings of 4.8% in 2019.
902.5
1,406.5
1,313.6
607.7
67.3
899.9
64.0
846.7
64.5
294.8
32.7
506.6
36.0
466.9
35.5
337.4
37.4
442.7
31.5
399.1
30.4
31.8
7.5
79.3
8.8
5.7
10.6
(408.4)
(45.3)
58.2
4.1
(40.8)
(3.1)
Direct-to-consumer (% of net sales) (1)
32
Wholesale/retail sales mix (%)
82%/18
81%/19
80%/20
Change in wholesale net sales ($)
(396.4)
107.6
85.7
Unfilled order position at end of period
218.2
295.4
331.6
(31.0)
(59.7)
(15.5)
(3.7)
(47.9)
(1.3)
Impact of changes in Canadian exchange rate on retail sales
179
390
417
Square footage, end of year (thousands sq. ft.)
269
387
394
Net sales decreased $504.0 million, or 35.8%, to $902.5 million in 2020, compared to $1,406.5 million last year. The sales decrease reflects the difficult selling environment driven by the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in brands with a heavier concentration of dress footwear, including Naturalizer, Sam Edelman, Allen Edmonds and Franco Sarto. In addition, sales were adversely impacted during the first half of 2020, as many of our wholesale customers canceled orders and temporarily closed their stores for several weeks. Our retail stores were also temporarily closed during the first half of the year. Our direct-to-consumer sales continue to grow as a percentage of the business, increasing to 32% in 2020, driven by strong growth in our e-commerce business.
We continue to strategically manage our portfolio of brands. In the first quarter of 2020, we announced our decision to exit the Fergie brand. In the fourth quarter of 2020, we announced that we were commencing a strategic realignment related to our Naturalizer retail operations in the United States and Canada. In an effort to continue to improve future profitability and allow greater focus on high-growth, digital channels, we are in the process of closing all Naturalizer stores, with the exception of a limited number of flagship locations. During the fourth quarter of 2020, we closed 39 Naturalizer stores and anticipate the remaining planned store closures to occur in the first quarter of 2021. We continue to view the Naturalizer brand as a strong and value-driving component of our portfolio. Therefore, we will be focusing on growing the brand’s e-commerce business through naturalizer.com, our retail partners and their websites, and the flagship stores. During 2019, we entered into a partnership with Veronica Beard and also transformed and relaunched the Zodiac brand, while making the decision to shift away from the Carlos Santana brand and reposition the Via Spiga brand.
We opened 7 stores and closed 65 stores during 2020, resulting in a total of 170 stores at the end of 2020. Sales per square foot, excluding e-commerce, decreased 54.1% to $179, compared to $390 last year. Our unfilled order position for our wholesale business decreased $77.2 million, or 26.1%, to $218.2 million at the end of 2020, compared to $295.4 million at the end of last year. The decrease in our backlog order levels reflects fewer orders as our wholesale customers shift to responding to consumer demand in-season, resulting in fewer upfront orders, as well as the ongoing economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Gross profit decreased $211.8 million, or 41.8%, to $294.8 million in 2020, compared to $506.6 million last year, primarily reflecting lower net sales and an incremental $27.5 million in inventory markdowns reflecting the difficult retail environment and $4.0 million in inventory markdowns related to the decision in 2020 to close all but a limited number of our Naturalizer retail stores and exit our Fergie brand. Cost of goods sold in 2019 includes $5.8 million of incremental cost of goods sold related to purchase accounting inventory adjustments and $3.0 million associated with the decision to exit the Carlos brand and reposition our Via Spiga brand, as further discussed in the Overview section above. As a percentage of sales, our gross profit rate decreased to 32.7% in 2020, compared to 36.0% last year, reflecting the above factors.
Selling and administrative expenses decreased $105.3 million, or 23.8%, to $337.4 million during 2020, compared to $442.7 million last year, driven by lower salaries expense reflecting the strategic actions taken during the first half of 2020 to mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The decrease also reflects lower logistics expenses and a reduction of variable expenses, including certain rent concessions, associated with the retail store closures and the declining store base. As a percentage of net sales, selling and administrative expenses increased to 37.4% in 2020 from 31.5% last year, reflecting the above named factors.
We incurred impairment charges of $286.5 million during 2020, including $240.3 million associated with goodwill and $46.2 million associated with intangible assets, including $32.0 for the Allen Edmonds trade name, $10.2 million for the Via Spiga trade name and $4.0 million associated with other Allen Edmonds intangible assets. The goodwill impairment charges were a result of the unfavorable business climate and our lower market capitalization, due in part to the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. There were no corresponding impairment charges in 2019. See Note 1 and Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to the impairment.
Restructuring and other special charges of $79.3 million in 2020 were primarily comprised of $63.6 million for impairment charges on store furniture and fixtures and lease right-of-use assets, liabilities due to our factories for order cancellations and severance expense. In addition, we incurred $12.4 million associated with the decision to close all but a limited number of Naturalizer retail stores and $3.3 million in integration-related costs for Vionic. In 2019, restructuring and other special charges of $5.7 million in 2019 were comprised of $5.1 million for expense containment initiatives and $0.6 million of costs associated with the decision to exit the Carlos brand. Refer to Note 2 and Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to these charges.
33
Operating (loss) earnings decreased $466.6 million to an operating loss of $408.4 million in 2020, compared to operating earnings of $58.2 million last year, as a result of the factors described above. As a percentage of net sales, the operating loss was 45.3% in 2020, compared to operating earnings of 4.1% last year.
ELIMINATIONS AND OTHER
(49.0)
(73.0)
(85.5)
(51.3)
104.8
(75.4)
103.3
(84.1)
98.4
2.3
(4.8)
2.4
(3.3)
(1.4)
54.9
(112.2)
28.0
(38.4)
(43.9)
(1.6)
5.6
(7.7)
5.2
(6.1)
Operating loss
(53.4)
(109.0)
(31.2)
42.7
(44.1)
51.5
The Eliminations and Other category includes the elimination of intersegment sales and profit, unallocated corporate administrative expenses, and other costs and recoveries.
The net sales elimination of $49.0 million for 2020 is $24.0 million, or 32.9%, lower than in 2019, reflecting a decrease in product sold from our Brand Portfolio segment to Famous Footwear.
Selling and administrative expenses increased $26.9 million, or 95.9%, to $54.9 million in 2020, compared to $28.0 million last year, primarily driven by higher unallocated logistics, insurance and consulting expenses.
Restructuring and other special charges of $0.8 million in 2020 were comprised primarily of costs associated with workforce reductions as we sought to align our expense structure with the lower sales performance, combined with incremental expenses associated with deep cleaning our facilities and related supplies. In 2019, restructuring and other special charges of $5.6 million were comprised of $3.8 million for expense containment initiatives and $1.8 million for Vionic integration-related costs.
RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER INITIATIVES
During 2020, we incurred restructuring and other special charges of $96.7 million, including approximately $80.9 million in costs primarily associated with the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, consisting of impairment charges associated with lease right-of-use assets and retail store furniture and fixtures, liabilities associated with factory order cancellations and severance. In addition, we incurred $12.4 million related to the decision to close all but a limited number of Naturalizer retail stores and $3.4 million of integration-related costs for Vionic.
During 2019, we incurred restructuring and other special charges of $14.8 million, including approximately $12.3 million related to our expense containment initiatives, $1.9 million of acquisition and integration-related costs for Vionic, and $0.5 million related to the decision to exit the Carlos brand and reposition our Via Spiga brand. In addition to the severance and benefits presented as restructuring and other special charges, we also incurred $2.7 million in special charges for our pension associated with the VERP, which is included in other income, net in the consolidated statement of earnings, as further discussed in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements.
Refer to the Financial Highlights section above and Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to these charges.
IMPACT OF INFLATION AND CHANGING PRICES
Although inflation has slowed in recent years, it is still a factor in our economy. While we have felt the effects of inflation on our business and results of operations, it has not had a significant impact over the last three years. Inflation can have a long-term impact on our business because increasing costs of materials and labor may impact our ability to maintain satisfactory profit rates. For example, our products are manufactured in other countries, and a decline in the value of the
34
U.S. dollar and the impact of labor shortages in China or other countries, or the imposition of tariffs, may result in higher product costs. Similarly, any potential shortage of quantities or, if significant, increases in the cost of the materials that are used in our manufacturing process, such as leather and other materials or resources, could have a material negative impact on our business and results of operations. In addition, inflation is often accompanied by higher interest rates, which could have a negative impact on consumer spending, in which case our net sales and profit rates could decrease. Moreover, increases in inflation may not be matched by increases in wages, which also could have a negative impact on consumer spending. If we incur increased costs that we are unable to be recover through price increases, or if consumer spending decreases generally, our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows may be adversely affected. In an effort to mitigate the impact of these incremental costs on our operating results, we expect to pass on some portion of cost increases to our consumers and adjust our business model, as appropriate, to minimize the impact of higher costs. Further discussion of the potential impact of inflation and changing prices is included in Item 1A, Risk Factors.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Borrowings
January 30, 2021
February 1, 2020
(Decrease) Increase
Borrowings under revolving credit agreement
250.0
275.0
(25.0)
Long-term debt
198.9
198.4
0.5
Total debt (1)
448.9
473.4
(24.5)
Total debt obligations decreased $24.5 million to $448.9 million at the end of 2020, compared to $473.4 million at the end of last year, as we made continued progress on paying back borrowings which were used to fund the Vionic acquisition in October 2018. Net interest expense in 2020 was $48.3 million, compared to $33.1 million in 2019. The increase in net interest expense in 2020 was primarily attributable to the fair value adjustment for the mandatory purchase obligation associated with the Blowfish Malibu acquisition, as further discussed in Note 2 and Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements, partially offset by lower average borrowings under our revolving credit agreement.
Credit Agreement
As further discussed in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company maintains a revolving credit facility for working capital needs. The Company is the lead borrower, and Sidney Rich Associates, Inc., BG Retail, LLC, Allen Edmonds LLC, Vionic Group LLC and Vionic International LLC are each co-borrowers and guarantors under the revolving credit facility. On January 18, 2019, the Loan Parties entered into the Third Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement to extend the maturity date to January 18, 2024 and changed the borrowing capacity under the former credit agreement from an aggregate amount of up to $600.0 million to an aggregate amount of up to $500.0 million, with the option to increase by up to $250.0 million. The Third Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement also reduced upfront and unused borrowing fees, provided for less restrictive covenants and offered more flexibility. On April 14, 2020, we entered into a Fourth Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (as so amended, the “Credit Agreement”) which, among other modifications, increased the amount available under the revolving credit facility by $100.0 million to an aggregate amount of up to $600.0 million, subject to borrowing base restrictions, and may be further increased by up to $150.0 million.
Borrowing availability under the Credit Agreement is limited to the lesser of the total commitments and the borrowing base ("Loan Cap"), which is based on stated percentages of the sum of eligible accounts receivable, eligible inventory and eligible credit card receivables, as defined, less applicable reserves. Under the Credit Agreement, the Loan Parties’ obligations are secured by a first-priority security interest in all accounts receivable, inventory and certain other collateral.
Interest on borrowings is at variable rates based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) (with a floor of 1.0% imposed by the Credit Agreement) or the prime rate, as defined in the Credit Agreement, plus a spread. The interest rate and fees for letters of credit vary based upon the level of excess availability under the Credit Agreement. There is an unused line fee payable on the unused portion under the facility and a letter of credit fee payable on the outstanding face amount under letters of credit. Refer to further discussion regarding the Credit Agreement in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
35
At January 30, 2021, we had $250.0 million borrowings and $11.2 million in letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Agreement. Total borrowing availability was $136.0 million at January 30, 2021. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility, which will be used for working capital needs, will bear interest at LIBOR plus a spread of between 1.25% and 1.5%.
The accordion feature of our revolving credit facility provides us with a maximum of $250 million in additional borrowing capacity subject to our compliance with covenants and restrictions under the Credit Agreement. Currently, based on our level of inventory and accounts receivable, the accordion feature would provide approximately $100.0 million of additional borrowing capacity. We were in compliance with all covenants and restrictions under the Credit Agreement as of January 30, 2021. Our credit rating was downgraded in March 2020 by Moody’s and S&P and again in April 2020 by Moody’s. Further deterioration in our credit ratings or non-compliance with any covenants or restrictions under the Credit Agreement may impact our ability to access borrowings or capital, as well as negatively impact interest rates and the cost of borrowings.
$200 Million Senior Notes
On July 27, 2015, we issued $200.0 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes due in 2023 (the "Senior Notes"). The Senior Notes are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by each of the subsidiaries of Caleres, Inc. that is an obligor under the Credit Agreement, and bear interest at 6.25%, which is payable on February 15 and August 15 of each year. The Senior Notes mature on August 15, 2023. We may redeem some or all of the Senior Notes at various redemption prices, as further discussed in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
The Senior Notes also contain covenants and restrictions that limit certain activities including, among other things, levels of indebtedness, payments of dividends, the guarantee or pledge of assets, certain investments, common stock repurchases, mergers and acquisitions and sales of assets. As of January 30, 2021, we were in compliance with all covenants and restrictions relating to the Senior Notes.
Supplemental Guarantor Financial Information
The Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally and jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by all of our existing and future subsidiaries that are guarantors under the Credit Agreement. The guarantors are 100% owned by Caleres, Inc. (“Parent”). On October 31, 2018, Vionic was joined to the Credit Agreement as a guarantor. After giving effect to the joinder, the Company is lead borrower, and Sidney Rich Associates, Inc., BG Retail, LLC, Allen Edmonds and Vionic are each co-borrowers and guarantors under the Credit Agreement. During the second quarter of 2020, we adopted SEC Release No. 33-10762, Financial Disclosures About Guarantors and Issuers of Guaranteed Securities and Affiliates Whose Securities Collateralize a Registrant’s Securities, as further discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. The following tables present summarized financial information for the Parent and guarantors on a combined basis after the elimination of intercompany transactions between entities and amounts related to investments in any subsidiary that is a non-guarantor:
Current assets
686.3
Non-current assets
1,029.5
Current liabilities
818.4
Non-current liabilities
740.0
Net sales (1)
1,939.2
728.4
(421.6)
(345.1)
36
Working Capital and Cash Flow
Working capital ($ millions) (1)
(123.0)
31.3
Current ratio (2)
0.86:1
1.04:1
Debt-to-capital ratio (3)
68.8
42.2
Working capital at January 30, 2021, was a deficit of $123.0 million, which was $154.3 million lower than at February 1, 2020. Our current ratio was 0.86 to 1 at February 1, 2020, compared to 1.04 to 1 at February 1, 2020. The decrease in both working capital and current ratio from 2019 reflects many factors, including lower inventories driven by disciplined inventory management during 2020 and the impact of port delays at the end of 2020 which delayed the flow of certain product, as well as the reclassification of the Blowfish Malibu mandatory purchase obligation to current liabilities, reflecting the anticipated settlement in 2021. Our debt-to-capital ratio was 68.8% as of January 30, 2021, compared to 42.2% at February 1, 2020, primarily reflecting lower equity resulting from our net loss in 2020.
Increase (Decrease)
in Cash and
Cash Equivalents
Net cash provided by operating activities
126.4
170.8
(44.4)
Net cash used for investing activities
(22.1)
(49.5)
27.4
Net cash used for financing activities
(61.3)
(106.3)
45.0
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
43.1
15.0
28.1
Cash provided by operating activities was $44.4 million lower in 2020 than last year, reflecting the following factors:
Supply chain financing: Certain of our suppliers are given the opportunity to sell receivables from us related to products we’ve purchased to participating financial institutions at a rate that leverages our credit rating, which may be more beneficial to the suppliers than the rate they can obtain based upon their own credit rating. We negotiate payment and other terms with our suppliers, regardless of whether the supplier participates in the program, and our responsibility is limited to making payment based on the terms originally negotiated with the supplier. These liabilities continue to be presented as accounts payable in our consolidated balance sheets and reflected as cash flows from operating activities when settled. As of January 30, 2021, we had $28.5 million of accounts payable subject to supply chain financing arrangements. There was an immaterial amount of accounts payable subject to supply chain financing arrangements at February 1, 2020. We believe the impact of supply chain financing is not material to our overall liquidity position.
Cash used for investing activities was $27.4 million lower in 2020 than last year, primarily reflecting lower capital expenditures in 2020 as a result of the steps taken to reduce and/or defer capital expenditures to preserve financial flexibility during the pandemic. In 2021, we expect our purchases of property and equipment and capitalized software to be between $20 million and $30 million.
37
Cash used for financing activities was $45.0 million lower in 2020 than last year, primarily due to lower net repayments on our revolving credit agreement of $25.0 million in 2020 compared to $60.0 million in 2019. In addition, share repurchases under our share repurchase programs decreased $10.1 million to $23.3 million in 2020 compared to $33.4 million in 2019.
We paid dividends of $0.28 per share in each of 2020, 2019 and 2018. The 2020 dividends marked the 98th year of consecutive quarterly dividends. On March 11, 2021, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share, payable on April 9, 2021, to shareholders of record on March 25, 2021, marking the 392nd consecutive quarterly dividend to be paid by the Company. The declaration and payment of any future dividend is at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on our results of operations, financial condition, business conditions and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Certain accounting issues require management estimates and judgments for the preparation of financial statements. Our most significant policies requiring the use of estimates and judgments are listed below.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives are not amortized but are subject to annual impairment tests. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, a company is permitted, but not required, to qualitatively assess indicators of a reporting unit’s fair value when it is unlikely that a reporting unit is impaired. If a quantitative test is deemed necessary, a discounted cash flow analysis is prepared to estimate fair value. If the recorded values of these assets are not recoverable, based on either the qualitative assessment or discounted cash flow analysis, goodwill impairment is recognized for the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying value of goodwill. We perform impairment tests as of the beginning of the fourth quarter of each fiscal year unless events or circumstances indicate an interim test is required. Other intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives and are reviewed for impairment if and when impairment indicators are present.
Goodwill
During the first quarter of 2020, as a result of the significant decline in the Company’s share price and market capitalization, and the impact of COVID-19 on our business operations, we determined that an interim assessment of goodwill was required and performed the quantitative assessment for all reporting units as of May 2, 2020. The quantitative test is a fair value-based test applied at the reporting unit level, which is generally at or one level below the operating segment level. The test compared the fair value of each reporting unit to the carrying value of that reporting unit. This test requires significant assumptions, estimates and judgments by management, and is subject to inherent uncertainties and subjectivity. The fair value of the reporting unit is determined using an estimate of future cash flows of the reporting unit and a risk-adjusted discount rate to compute a net present value of future cash flows. Projected net sales, gross profit, selling and administrative expenses, capital expenditures and working capital requirements are based on the past performance of the reporting units as well as our internal projections. Discount rates reflect market-based estimates of the risks associated with the projected cash flows of the reporting unit directly resulting from the use of its assets in its operations. We also considered assumptions that market participants may use. The estimates of the fair values of our reporting units were based on the best information available to us as of the date of the assessment. In our quantitative assessments of goodwill, our projected net sales growth rates, gross profit, selling and administrative expenses and discount rates require significant management judgment and are the assumptions to which the fair value calculation is the most sensitive. The interim assessment indicated that the carrying value of the goodwill associated with the Brand Portfolio and Vionic reporting units exceeded the carrying value, resulting in total non-cash goodwill impairment charges of $240.3 million in the first quarter of 2020.
In addition to the interim assessment, we performed an impairment review of the goodwill associated with the Blowfish Malibu reporting unit as of the first day of our fourth fiscal quarter. We elected to perform the optional qualitative assessment, which indicated no impairment. During 2019 and 2018, the goodwill impairment testing was performed as of the first day of our fourth fiscal quarter, which resulted in no impairment charges recorded during 2019 and $38.0 million of non-cash impairment charges for the impairment of goodwill of our Allen Edmonds reporting unit in 2018.
38
Other Intangible Assets
During the first quarter of 2020, as a result of the triggering event from the economic impacts of COVID-19, an interim assessment of our indefinite-lived intangible assets was performed as of May 2, 2020. We tested our indefinite-lived intangible assets, consisting of trade names, utilizing the relief-from-royalty method to determine the estimated fair value of each indefinite-lived intangible asset. The relief-from-royalty method estimates the theoretical royalty savings from ownership of the trade name. Key assumptions used in our assessments include net sales projections, discount rates and royalty rates. Royalty rates are established by management based on comparable trade name licensing agreements in the market. The net sales projections, discount rates and royalty rates utilized in our quantitative assessments of indefinite-lived intangible assets require significant management judgment and are the assumptions to which the fair value calculation is most sensitive. The impairment review resulted in total impairment charges of $22.4 million in the first quarter of 2020, including $12.2 million associated with the indefinite-lived Allen Edmonds trade name and $10.2 million of impairment associated with the indefinite-lived Via Spiga trade name. The carrying value of the Via Spiga trade name of $0.5 million will be amortized over approximately two years. Changes in any of the assumptions used in the impairment assessments could negatively impact future fair value calculations, potentially resulting in an impairment charge on other trade names in subsequent assessments. In addition to the interim assessment, we evaluated the indefinite-lived intangible assets and the definite-lived Allen Edmonds customer relationship intangible asset as of the first day of our fourth fiscal quarter. The indefinite-lived trade names were evaluated using the key assumptions described above. These impairment reviews resulted in additional impairment totaling $23.8 million, consisting of $19.8 million associated with the Allen Edmonds tradename and $4.0 million associated with the Allen Edmonds customer relationships intangible asset. The 2019 impairment reviews for indefinite-lived intangible assets indicated no impairment. During 2018, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $60.0 million for the impairment of the Allen Edmonds indefinite-lived trade name. Refer to Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to goodwill and intangible assets.
Store Impairment Charges
We regularly analyze the results of all stores and assess the viability of underperforming stores to determine whether events or circumstances exist that indicate the stores should be closed or whether the carrying amount of their long-lived assets may not be recoverable. After allowing for an appropriate start-up period, unusual nonrecurring events or favorable trends, property and equipment at stores and the lease right-of-use assets indicated as impaired are written down to fair value as calculated using a discounted cash flow method. The fair value of the lease right-of-use assets is determined utilizing projected cash flows for each store location, discounted using a risk-adjusted discount rate, subject to a market floor based on current market lease rates. The projected cash flows of the stores (including net sales projections), discount rates and current market lease rates for the remaining lease term of the related stores used to determine fair value require significant management judgment and are the assumptions to which the fair value calculations are most sensitive. We recorded asset impairment charges, primarily related to underperforming retail stores, of $56.3 million during 2020, including $31.4 million associated with operating lease right-of-use assets and $24.9 million associated with property and equipment, primarily reflecting the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our retail operations as well as the decision to close all but a few of our Naturalizer retail stores.
Inventories
Inventories are one of our most significant assets, representing approximately 26% of total assets at the end of 2020. We value inventories at the lower of cost and net realizable value with 88% of consolidated inventories using the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method. An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO calculations are based on management’s estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and costs and are subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation. As further discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, a reduction in inventory quantities associated with the ongoing exit of our Naturalizer retail business resulted in a liquidation of LIFO layers and a reduction of the LIFO reserve of $2.9 million.
We apply judgment in valuing our inventories by assessing the net realizable value of our inventories based on current selling prices. At our Famous Footwear segment and certain operations within our Brand Portfolio segment, we recognize markdowns when it becomes evident that inventory items will be sold at prices less than cost, plus the cost to sell the product. This policy causes the gross profit rates at our Famous Footwear segment and, to a lesser extent, our Brand Portfolio segment to be lower than the initial markup during periods when permanent price reductions are taken to clear product. For the majority of our Brand Portfolio segment, we provide markdown reserves to reduce the carrying values
of inventories to a level where, upon sale of the product, we will realize our normal gross profit rate. We believe these policies reflect the difference in operating models between our Famous Footwear segment and our Brand Portfolio segment. Famous Footwear periodically runs promotional events to drive sales to clear seasonal inventories. The Brand Portfolio segment generally relies on permanent price reductions to clear slower-moving inventory.
We perform physical inventory counts or cycle counts on merchandise inventory on hand throughout the year and adjust the recorded balance to reflect the results. We record estimated shrinkage between physical inventory counts based on historical results. Inventory shrinkage is included as a component of cost of goods sold.
Income Tax Valuation Allowances
We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. Valuation allowances are established if we believe that it is more-likely-than-not that some or all of our deferred tax assets will not be realized. The evaluation of the realizability of deferred tax assets requires significant assumptions, estimates and judgment by management, including estimates of future taxable income by jurisdiction. Such estimates are subject to inherent uncertainties and subjectivity.
As of January 30, 2021, we are in a three-year cumulative loss position for federal, state and certain international jurisdictions. We have valuation allowances totaling $50.0 million as of January 30, 2021, reflecting the uncertainty regarding the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards and other deferred tax assets.
Impact of Prospective Accounting Pronouncements
Recent accounting pronouncements and their impact on the Company are described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements as of January 30, 2021.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The table below sets forth our significant future obligations by time period. Further information on certain of these commitments is provided in the notes to our consolidated financial statements, which are cross-referenced in this table. Our obligations outstanding as of January 30, 2021 include the following:
Payments Due by Period
Less Than
1-3
3-5
More Than
1 Year
Years
5 Years
Borrowings under Credit Agreement (1)
Long-term debt (2)
200.0
Interest on long-term debt (2)
12.5
25.0
Operating lease commitments, including imputed interest (3)
776.9
176.9
245.4
152.7
201.9
Minimum license commitments
Purchase obligations (4)
593.7
571.6
16.2
4.4
Mandatory purchase obligation (5)
39.1
Other (6)
18.5
1.9
3.2
6.2
7.2
Total (7)
1,923.2
1,059.5
489.8
160.4
213.5
40
SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995 AND FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results could differ materially from those projected as they are subject to various risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, the risks detailed in Item 1A, Risk Factors, and those described in other documents and reports filed from time to time with the SEC, press releases and other communications. We do not undertake any obligation or plan to update these forward-looking statements, even though our situation may change.
ITEM 7AQUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATES
The market risk inherent in our financial instruments and positions represents the potential loss arising from adverse changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. To address these risks, we enter into various hedging transactions. All decisions on hedging transactions are authorized and executed pursuant to our policies and procedures, which do not allow the use of financial instruments for trading purposes. We also are exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to these financial instruments. Counterparties to these agreements, however, are major international financial institutions, and we believe the risk of loss due to nonperformance is minimal.
A description of our accounting policies for derivative financial instruments is included in Notes 1 and 14 to the consolidated financial statements.
In addition, we are exposed to translation risk because certain of our international operations use the local currency as their functional currency and those financial results must be translated into United States dollars. As currency exchange rates fluctuate, translation of our financial statements of international businesses into United States dollars affects the comparability of financial results between years.
INTEREST RATES
Our financing arrangements include outstanding variable rate debt under the Credit Agreement and $200.0 million in principal value of 2023 Senior Notes, which bear interest at a fixed rate of 6.25%. Changes in interest rates impact fixed
and variable rate debt differently. For fixed-rate debt, a change in interest rates will only impact the fair value of the debt, whereas a change in the interest rates on variable- rate debt will impact interest expense and cash flows.
At January 30, 2021, the fair value of our long-term debt is estimated at approximately $201.0 million based upon the pricing of our 2023 Senior Notes at that time. Market risk is viewed as the potential change in fair value of our debt resulting from a hypothetical 10% adverse change in interest rates and would be $2.8 million for our long-term debt at January 30, 2021.
Information appearing under the caption Risk Management and Derivatives in Note 14 and Fair Value Measurements in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 8FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework). Based on our evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of January 30, 2021. The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 30, 2021 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its report which is included herein.
The Shareholders and Board of Directors of Caleres, Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited Caleres, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 30, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Caleres, Inc. (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 30, 2021, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of Caleres, Inc. as of January 30, 2021 and February 1, 2020, the related consolidated statements of earnings (loss), comprehensive income (loss), cash flows and shareholders’ equity for each of the three years in the period ended January 30, 2021, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a), and our report dated March 30, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
March 30, 2021
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Caleres, Inc. (the Company) as of January 30, 2021 and February 1, 2020, the related consolidated statements of earnings (loss), comprehensive income (loss), cash flows, and shareholders’ equity for each of the three years in the period ended January 30, 2021, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at January 30, 2021 and February 1, 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 30, 2021, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 30, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) and our report dated March 30, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Impairment of Allen Edmonds indefinite-lived trade name
Description of the Matter
As discussed in Note 1, the Company performs an impairment test on its indefinite-lived intangible assets as of the first day of the fourth quarter of each fiscal year unless events indicate an interim test is required. During the first quarter of 2020, as a result of the triggering event from the economic impacts of COVID-19, an interim assessment of the Company’s indefinite-lived intangible assets was performed as of May 2, 2020. In addition to the interim assessment, the Company evaluated the indefinite-lived intangible assets as of the first day of the fourth fiscal quarter. The Company recorded total impairment charges of $32.0 million associated with the indefinite-lived Allen Edmonds trade name during the year ended January 30, 2021.
Auditing the Company’s interim and annual impairment tests for the indefinite-lived Allen Edmonds trade name was complex and involved a high degree of subjectivity, as considerable management judgment was necessary to estimate the fair value of the Allen Edmonds trade name. For the Allen Edmonds trade name, the key assumptions used include net sales projections, royalty rate, and discount rate. These assumptions are subjective in nature and are affected by expectations about future market or economic conditions, particularly those in the retail industry.
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s indefinite-lived Allen Edmonds trade name impairment process. This included testing controls over the Company’s budgeting and forecasting process used to develop the projected net sales and the selection of royalty rates and discount rates used in estimating the fair value of Allen Edmonds trade name. We also tested controls over the Company’s review of the valuation model and key assumptions described above, as well as the completeness and accuracy of data used in the valuation model.
We performed audit procedures that included, among other procedures, assessing methodologies and testing the key assumptions discussed above and the underlying data used by the Company in its analysis to estimate the fair value of the Allen Edmonds trade name. For example, we compared the significant assumptions used by the Company to historical results, current industry and economic trends and other guideline companies within the same industry. In addition, we performed sensitivity analyses of significant assumptions to evaluate the changes in the fair value of the Allen Edmonds trade name that would result from changes in the underlying assumptions. We also compared the assumptions used in the forecasted cash flows with the Company’s strategic plans. In addition, we involved internal specialists to assist in evaluating the Company’s discount rate and royalty rate.
45
Impairment of store assets
As discussed in Notes 1 and 13, the Company regularly analyzes the results of all of its stores and assesses the viability of underperforming stores to determine whether events or circumstances exist that indicate the stores should be closed or whether the carrying amount of their long-lived assets may not be recoverable. Property and equipment and the lease right-of-use assets indicated as impaired are written down to fair value as calculated using a discounted cash flow method. The fair value of the lease right-of-use assets is determined utilizing projected cash flows for each store location, discounted using a risk-adjusted discount rate, subject to a floor based on current market lease rates. The Company recorded asset impairment charges, primarily related to underperforming retail stores, of $56.3 million during the year ended January 30, 2021. The impairment charges recorded, included $31.4 million associated with lease right-of-use assets and $24.9 million associated with property and equipment.
Auditing the Company’s long-lived store impairment analysis was complex and involved a high degree of subjectivity, due to the estimation required in determining the projected cash flows used to assess recoverability (undiscounted) and determining the fair value (discounted). The significant assumptions used include estimated future cash flows directly related to the future operation of the stores (including net sales projections) and the discount rate used to determine fair value. Significant assumptions used in determining the fair value of the lease right-of-use assets include the current market lease rates for the remaining lease term of the related stores and risk-adjusted discount rate. These assumptions are subjective in nature and are affected by expectations about future market or economic conditions, particularly those in the retail industry.
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s long-lived store impairment process. This included testing controls over the Company's budget and forecasting process used to develop the projected undiscounted and discounted cash flows used in estimating the fair value of the retail stores. We also tested controls over the Company’s review of the valuation model, including the model used to estimate the fair value of the lease right-of-use asset and significant, assumptions described above, as well as the completeness and accuracy of data used in the valuation model.
We performed audit procedures which included, among other procedures, testing the significant assumptions discussed above and other underlying data used by the Company to estimate the projected undiscounted and discounted cash flows to estimate the fair value of the retail stores,. For example, we compared the significant assumptions used by the Company to historical results, current industry and economic trends and other guideline companies within the same industry. In addition, we performed sensitivity analyses of significant assumptions to evaluate the changes in the individual retail stores identified for impairment and the fair value of the individual retail stores that would result from changes in the underlying assumptions. We also compared the assumptions used in the forecasted cash flows with the Company’s strategic plans. In addition, we involved internal specialists to assist in testing the market rent of the store leases and risk-adjusted discount rates by comparing them to current market lease rates for comparable leases and available market data
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1917.
46
($ thousands, except number of shares and per share amounts)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
88,295
45,218
Receivables, net of allowances of $31,971 in 2020 and $28,827 in 2019
126,994
162,181
Inventories, net of adjustment to last-in, first-out cost of $793 in 2020 and $3,826 in 2019
487,955
618,406
Income taxes
33,925
6,189
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
45,387
50,305
Total current assets
782,556
882,299
Prepaid pension costs
88,833
50,660
Lease right-of-use assets
554,303
695,594
Property and equipment, net
172,437
224,846
Deferred income taxes
9,735
4,956
245,275
Intangible assets, net
235,115
294,304
Other assets
28,850
28,994
Total assets
1,867,050
2,431,707
Liabilities and Equity
Current liabilities:
250,000
275,000
Mandatory purchase obligation - Blowfish Malibu
39,134
Trade accounts payable
280,501
267,018
Employee compensation and benefits
48,641
54,720
5,069
7,186
Lease obligations
153,060
127,869
Other accrued expenses
129,104
119,157
Total current liabilities
905,509
850,950
Other liabilities:
Noncurrent lease obligations
518,942
629,032
198,851
198,391
5,038
7,786
8,244
55,013
Other liabilities
26,612
41,405
Total other liabilities
757,687
931,627
Equity:
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares outstanding
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 37,966,204 and 40,396,757 shares outstanding, net of 8,120,591 and 5,690,038 treasury shares in 2020 and 2019, respectively
380
404
Additional paid-in capital
160,446
153,489
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(9,136)
(31,843)
Retained earnings
48,557
523,900
Total Caleres, Inc. shareholders’ equity
200,247
645,950
Noncontrolling interests
3,607
3,180
Total equity
203,854
649,130
Total liabilities and equity
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
($ thousands, except per share amounts)
2,117,070
2,921,562
2,834,846
1,330,021
1,737,202
1,678,502
787,049
1,184,360
1,156,344
889,489
1,065,760
1,041,765
286,524
98,044
96,694
14,787
16,134
(485,658)
103,813
401
(48,287)
(33,123)
(18,277)
(186)
16,834
7,903
12,308
(517,111)
78,593
(5,754)
78,117
(16,511)
273
(438,994)
62,082
(5,481)
120
(737)
(40)
(439,114)
62,819
(5,441)
Basic (loss) earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders
(11.80)
1.53
(0.13)
Diluted (loss) earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders
($ thousands)
Other comprehensive income (loss) ("OCI"), net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustment
637
(607)
(1,224)
Pension and other postretirement benefits adjustments
22,146
(116)
(13,883)
Derivative financial instruments
92
516
(1,375)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
22,875
(207)
(16,482)
Comprehensive (loss) income
(416,119)
61,875
(21,963)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
288
(702)
(91)
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Caleres, Inc.
(416,407)
62,577
(21,872)
Operating Activities
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation
41,644
46,014
45,540
Amortization of capitalized software
5,911
6,486
10,136
Amortization of intangible assets
12,984
13,062
7,021
Amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discount
1,359
7,261
1,960
Fair value adjustments to mandatory purchase obligation
23,934
5,955
250
186
Share-based compensation expense
8,097
10,246
13,805
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
2,890
1,469
2,396
Impairment charges for property, equipment, and lease right-of-use assets
56,343
5,867
3,665
Provision for expected credit losses
10,575
773
518
Deferred rent
1,779
(37,034)
9,796
(6,922)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquired amounts:
Receivables
22,465
28,768
(2,635)
130,796
63,430
(51,676)
Prepaid expenses and other current and noncurrent assets
(12,400)
(16,833)
(6,064)
13,373
(46,106)
17,236
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
30,181
(27,304)
19,350
Income taxes, net
(32,600)
(517)
(17,736)
Other, net
305
337
(1,783)
126,353
170,786
129,589
Investing Activities
Purchases of property and equipment
(16,786)
(44,533)
(62,483)
Disposals of property and equipment
636
Capitalized software
(5,274)
(5,619)
(4,416)
Acquisition of Blowfish Malibu, net of cash received
(16,792)
Acquisition of Vionic, net of cash received
(352,666)
(22,060)
(49,516)
(436,357)
Financing Activities
438,500
288,500
360,000
Repayments under revolving credit agreement
(463,500)
(348,500)
(25,000)
Dividends paid
(10,764)
(11,422)
(11,983)
Debt issuance costs
(1,298)
Acquisition of treasury stock
(23,348)
(33,424)
(43,771)
Issuance of common stock under share-based plans, net
(1,135)
(2,644)
(4,372)
Contributions by noncontrolling interests, net
2,500
(1,198)
(1,342)
(406)
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities
(61,306)
(106,332)
273,170
90
(249)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
43,077
15,018
(33,847)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
30,200
64,047
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
See notes to consolidated financial statements, including the supplemental disclosures on cash flows in Note 1.
Accumulated
Comprehensive
Non-
($ thousands, except number of shares
Common Stock
Additional
(Loss)
Retained
Shareholders’
controlling
and per share amounts)
Shares
Dollars
Paid-In Capital
Income
Equity
Interests
Total Equity
BALANCE FEBRUARY 3, 2018
43,031,689
430
136,460
(15,170)
595,769
717,489
1,473
718,962
Net loss
(1,173)
(51)
Unrealized loss on derivative financial instruments, net of tax of $350
Pension and other postretirement benefits adjustments, net of tax of $4,816
Comprehensive loss
(16,431)
Dividends ($0.28 per share)
(1,465,649)
(15)
(43,756)
320,522
(4,376)
Cumulative-effect adjustment from adoption of ASU 2016-16
(10,468)
Cumulative-effect adjustment from adoption of ASU 2014-09 (Topic 606)
(4,775)
BALANCE FEBRUARY 2, 2019
41,886,562
419
145,889
(31,601)
519,346
634,053
1,382
635,435
Net earnings (loss)
(642)
Unrealized gain on derivative financial instruments, net of tax of $127
Pension and other postretirement benefits adjustments, net of tax of $42
(242)
Contributions by noncontrolling interests
(1,704,240)
(17)
(33,407)
214,435
(2,646)
Cumulative-effect adjustment from adoption of ASC 842
(13,436)
BALANCE FEBRUARY 1, 2020
40,396,757
469
168
Unrealized gain on derivative financial instruments, net of tax of $31
Pension and other postretirement benefits adjustments, net of tax of $7,671
Comprehensive income (loss)
22,707
(2,902,122)
(29)
(23,319)
471,569
(1,140)
Cumulative-effect adjustment from adoption of ASC 326
(2,146)
BALANCE JANUARY 30, 2021
37,966,204
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Organization
Caleres, Inc., originally founded as Brown Shoe Company in 1878 and incorporated in 1913, is a global footwear company. The Company’s shares are traded under the “CAL” symbol on the New York Stock Exchange.
The Company provides a broad offering of licensed, branded and private-label athletic, casual and dress footwear products to women, men and children. The footwear is sold at a variety of price points through multiple distribution channels both domestically and internationally. The Company currently operates 1,086 retail shoe stores in the United States, Canada, China and Guam under the Famous Footwear, Naturalizer, Sam Edelman and Allen Edmonds names. In addition, through its Brand Portfolio segment, the Company designs, sources and markets footwear to retail stores domestically and internationally, including online retailers, national chains, department stores, mass merchandisers and independent retailers. Refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding the Company’s revenue by category and Note 8 for discussion of the Company’s business segments.
The Company’s business is seasonal in nature due to consumer spending patterns with higher back-to-school and holiday season sales. Traditionally, the third fiscal quarter accounts for a substantial portion of the Company’s earnings for the year.
Certain prior period amounts in the notes to the consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications did not affect net (loss) earnings attributable to Caleres, Inc.
Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries, after the elimination of intercompany accounts and transactions.
Noncontrolling Interests
Noncontrolling interests in the Company’s consolidated financial statements result from the accounting for noncontrolling interests in partially-owned consolidated subsidiaries or affiliates. During 2019, the Company entered into a joint venture with Brand Investment Holding Limited ("Brand Investment Holding"), a member of the Gemkell Group. The Company and Brand Investment Holding are each 50% owners of the joint venture, which is named CLT Brand Solutions ("CLT"). During 2020, CLT was funded with $3.0 million in capital contributions, including $1.5 million from the Company and $1.5 million from Brand Investment Holding. In 2019, CLT was funded with $5.0 million in capital contributions, including $2.5 million from the Company and $2.5 million from Brand Investment Holding. Net sales and operating results were immaterial in both 2020 and 2019.
The Company had a joint venture agreement with a subsidiary of C. banner International Holdings Limited (“CBI”) to market Naturalizer footwear in China. The Company was a 51% owner of the joint venture (“B&H Footwear”), with CBI owning the other 49%. The license enabling the joint venture to market the footwear expired in August 2017 and the parties are in the process of dissolving their joint venture arrangements. The Company anticipates the liquidation to be completed in 2021.
The Company consolidates CLT and B&H Footwear into its consolidated financial statements. Net (loss) earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests represents the share of net earnings or losses that are attributable to CBI and Brand Investment Holding equity. Transactions between the Company and the joint ventures have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
Accounting Period
The Company’s fiscal year is the 52- or 53-week period ending the Saturday nearest to January 31. Fiscal years 2020, 2019 and 2018, all of which included 52 weeks, ended on January 30, 2021, February 1, 2020 and February 2, 2019, respectively.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The United States and global economies continue to be adversely affected by the coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic. Although the Company has reopened all its retail stores from the temporary store closures in the first half of 2020, the Company’s financial results were adversely impacted by COVID-19 in 2020. The Company took actions to manage its resources conservatively to mitigate the adverse impact of the pandemic, including reductions in the workforce, associate furloughs for a significant portion of the workforce during the first half of 2020, and reductions in salary for most remaining associates, as well as a reduction in the cash retainers for the Board of Directors through the end of the second quarter; reducing inventory purchases; reducing marketing expenses; and minimizing costs associated with the closed retail facilities. In addition, as a precautionary measure to increase its cash position and preserve financial flexibility given the uncertainty in the United States and global markets resulting from COVID-19, the Company increased the borrowings on its revolving credit facility in March 2020 to $440.0 million. In April, the Company entered into an amendment to the Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement to increase its borrowing capacity, as further discussed in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security ("CARES") Act was enacted. The CARES Act includes a provision that allows the Company to defer the employer portion of social security payroll tax payments that would have been paid between the enactment date and December 31, 2020, with 50% payable by December 31, 2021 and 50% payable by December 31, 2022. As of January 30, 2021, the Company has deferred $9.4 million of employer social security payroll taxes, of which $4.7 million are presented in other accrued expenses and $4.7 million are presented in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. In addition, as further discussed below and in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, the CARES Act permits the carryback of certain current operating losses to prior years, which resulted in an incremental tax benefit of $8.2 million.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. The Company had an immaterial amount of restricted cash as of January 30, 2021 and February 1, 2020.
Prior to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, (“Topic 326”) in 2020, the Company evaluated the collectability of selected accounts receivable on a case-by-case basis and recorded a reserve for incurred losses, considering such factors as ability to pay, bankruptcy, credit ratings and payment history. As those circumstances changed, estimates of recoverability were further adjusted. As further discussed below, the Company adopted Topic 326 on a modified retrospective basis during the first quarter of 2020, which replaced the “incurred loss” model with an “expected credit loss” model. In accordance with Topic 326, the Company estimates and records an expected lifetime credit loss on accounts receivable by utilizing credit ratings and other customer-related information, as well as historical loss experience. The Company recognized a provision for expected credit losses of $10.6 million in 2020, $0.8 million in 2019 and $0.5 million in 2018. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the financial results of many of the Company’s wholesale customers were adversely impacted due to store closures during the first half of 2020. Many of those customers also experienced deterioration in their credit ratings, which resulted in higher expected credit losses for the Company and an increase in expense in 2020.
Customer allowances represent reserves against the Company’s wholesale customers’ accounts receivable for margin assistance, product returns, customer deductions and co-op advertising allowances. The Company estimates the reserves needed for margin assistance by reviewing inventory levels on the retail floors, sell-through rates, historical dilution, current gross margin levels and other performance indicators of our major retail customers. Product returns and customer deductions are estimated using historical experience and anticipated future trends. Co-op advertising allowances are estimated based on customer agreements. The Company recognized a provision for customer allowances of $20.4 million in 2020, $62.7 million in 2019 and $54.2 million in 2018.
Customer discounts represent reserves against the Company’s accounts receivable for discounts that wholesale customers may take based on meeting certain order, payment or return guidelines. The Company estimates the reserves needed for customer discounts based upon customer net sales and respective agreement terms. The Company recognized a provision for customer discounts of $11.7 million in 2020, $12.0 million in 2019 and $5.5 million in 2018.
All inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value with approximately 88% of consolidated inventories using the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method. An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO calculations are based on management’s estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and costs and are subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation. If the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method had been used, consolidated inventories would have been $0.8 million and $3.8 million higher at January 30, 2021 and February 1, 2020, respectively. In the fourth quarter of 2020, a reduction in inventory quantities associated with the ongoing exit of the Naturalizer retail business resulted in a liquidation of LIFO layers and reduction of the LIFO reserve of $2.9 million, with a corresponding reduction of cost of goods sold. Refer to Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to inventories.
The costs of inventory, inbound freight and duties, markdowns, shrinkage and royalty expense are classified in cost of goods sold. Costs of warehousing and distribution are classified in selling and administrative expenses and are expensed as incurred. Such warehousing and distribution costs totaled $84.0 million, $106.0 million and $106.9 million in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Costs of overseas sourcing offices and other inventory procurement costs are reflected in selling and administrative expenses and are expensed as incurred. Such sourcing and procurement costs totaled $18.6 million, $23.1 million and $22.1 million in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
The Company applies judgment in valuing inventories by assessing the net realizable value of inventories based on current selling prices. At the Famous Footwear segment and certain Brand Portfolio operations, markdowns are recognized when it becomes evident that inventory items will be sold at retail prices less than cost, plus the cost to sell the product. This policy causes the gross profit rates at Famous Footwear and, to a lesser extent, Brand Portfolio to be lower than the initial markup during periods when permanent price reductions are taken to clear product. For the majority of the Brand Portfolio operations, markdown reserves reduce the carrying values of inventories to a level where, upon sale of the product, the Company will realize its normal gross profit rate. The Company believes these policies reflect the difference in operating models between the Famous Footwear and Brand Portfolio segments. Famous Footwear periodically runs promotional events to drive sales to clear seasonal inventories. The Brand Portfolio segment relies on permanent price reductions to clear slower-moving inventory.
Markdowns are recorded to reflect expected adjustments to sales prices. In determining markdowns, management considers current and recently recorded sales prices, the length of time the product is held in inventory and quantities of various product styles contained in inventory, among other factors. The ultimate amount realized from the sale of certain products could differ from management estimates. The Company performs physical inventory counts or cycle counts on all merchandise inventory on hand throughout the year and adjusts the recorded balance to reflect the results. The Company records estimated shrinkage between physical inventory counts based on historical results.
Computer Software Costs
The Company capitalizes certain costs in other assets, including internal payroll costs incurred in connection with the development or acquisition of software for internal use. Other assets on the consolidated balance sheets include $15.5 million and $16.2 million of computer software costs as of January 30, 2021 and February 1, 2020, respectively, which are net of accumulated amortization of $131.1 million and $126.1 million as of the end of the respective periods. In addition, other assets on the consolidated balance sheets include $9.6 million and $8.0 million of implementation costs for software as a service as of January 30, 2021 and February 1, 2020, respectively, which are net of accumulated amortization of $0.6 million and $0.3 million as of the end of the respective periods.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation of property and equipment is provided over the estimated useful lives of the assets or the remaining lease terms, where applicable, using the straight-line method.
54
Interest Expense
Capitalized Interest
Interest costs for major asset additions are capitalized during the construction or development period and amortized over the lives of the related assets. There was no interest capitalized in 2020. The Company capitalized interest of $0.6 million and $0.2 million in 2019 and 2018, respectively, related to the new company-operated Brand Portfolio warehouse facilities in California.
Interest expense includes interest for borrowings under both the Company’s short-term and long-term debt, net of amounts capitalized, as well as accretion and fair value adjustments on the mandatory purchase obligation from the acquisition of Blowfish Malibu, as further described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. Interest expense also includes fees paid under the short-term revolving credit agreement for the unused portion of its line of credit, and the amortization of deferred debt issuance costs and debt discount.
Goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives are not amortized but are subject to annual impairment tests. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (ASC Topic 350), the Company is permitted, but not required, to qualitatively assess indicators of a reporting unit’s fair value when it is unlikely that a reporting unit is impaired. If a quantitative test is deemed necessary, a discounted cash flow analysis is prepared to estimate fair value. A fair value-based test is applied at the reporting unit level, which is generally at or one level below the operating segment level. The test compares the fair value of the Company’s reporting units to the carrying value of those reporting units. This test requires significant assumptions, estimates and judgments by management, and is subject to inherent uncertainties and subjectivity. The fair value of the reporting unit is determined using both a market approach and discounted cash flow analysis. The market approach method includes the use of multiples of comparable publicly-traded companies. The discounted cash flow approach estimates the fair value of the reporting unit using projected cash flows of the reporting unit and a risk-adjusted discount rate to compute a net present value of future cash flows. Projected net sales, gross profit, selling and administrative expense, capital expenditures and working capital requirements are based on the Company’s internal projections. Discount rates reflect market-based estimates of the risks associated with the projected cash flows of the reporting units directly resulting from the use of its assets in its operations. Assumptions that market participants may use are also considered. The estimate of the fair values of the Company’s reporting units is based on the best information available to the Company’s management as of the date of the assessment. The Company has adopted ASU 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which eliminates the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill. Goodwill impairment is recorded if the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, not to exceed the carrying value of goodwill.
The Company performs its goodwill impairment assessment as of the first day of the fourth quarter of each fiscal year unless events indicate an interim test is required. During the first quarter of 2020, as a result of the significant decline in the Company’s share price and market capitalization, and the impact of COVID-19 on business operations, the Company determined that an interim assessment of goodwill was required and performed the quantitative assessment for all reporting units. The interim assessment indicated that the carrying value of the goodwill associated with the Brand Portfolio and Vionic reporting units exceeded the carrying value, resulting in non-cash goodwill impairment charges totaling $240.3 million in the first quarter of 2020. In addition to the interim assessment, an impairment review of the goodwill associated with the Blowfish Malibu reporting unit was performed as of the first day of the fourth fiscal quarter, which indicated no impairment. In 2019, the Company elected to perform the quantitative assessment for all reporting units and determined that the fair values of the reporting units exceeded the carrying values, resulting in no impairment. During 2018, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $38.0 million for the impairment of goodwill of the Allen Edmonds reporting unit. Refer to Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of goodwill and intangible assets.
The Company performs impairment tests on its indefinite-lived intangible assets as of the first day of the fourth quarter of each fiscal year unless events indicate an interim test is required. Definite-lived intangible assets, other than goodwill, are amortized over their useful lives and are reviewed for impairment if and when impairment indicators are present. During the first quarter of 2020, as a result of the triggering event from the economic impacts of COVID-19, an interim assessment of the Company’s indefinite-lived intangible assets was performed as of May 2, 2020. The impairment review resulted in
total impairment charges of $22.4 million in the first quarter of 2020, including $12.2 million associated with the indefinite-lived Allen Edmonds trade name and $10.2 million of impairment associated with the indefinite-lived Via Spiga trade name. The carrying value of the Via Spiga trade name of $0.5 million is being amortized over approximately two years. In addition to the interim assessment, the Company evaluated the indefinite-lived intangible assets and the definite-lived Allen Edmonds customer relationship intangible asset as of the first day of the fourth fiscal quarter. These impairment reviews resulted in additional impairment totaling $23.8 million, consisting of $19.8 million associated with the Allen Edmonds tradename and $4.0 million associated with the Allen Edmonds customer relationships intangible asset. The indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment reviews performed as of the first day of the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter in 2019 and 2018 resulted in no impairment charges in 2019 and a non-cash impairment charge of $60.0 million in 2018 for the impairment the Allen Edmonds indefinite-lived trade name. Refer to Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
Self-Insurance Reserves
The Company is self-insured and/or retains high deductibles for a significant portion of its workers’ compensation, health, disability, cyber risk, general liability, automobile and property programs, among others. Liabilities associated with the risks that are retained by the Company are estimated by considering historical claims experience, trends of the Company and the industry and other actuarial assumptions. The estimated accruals for these liabilities could be affected if development of costs on claims differ from these assumptions and historical trends. Based on available information as of January 30, 2021, the Company believes it has provided adequate reserves for its self-insurance exposure. As of January 30, 2021 and February 1, 2020, self-insurance reserves were $10.4 million and $10.0 million, respectively.
Revenue Recognition
Retail sales, recognized at the point of sale, are recorded net of returns and exclude sales tax. Wholesale sales are recorded, net of returns, allowances and discounts, when obligations under the terms of a contract with the consumer are satisfied. This generally occurs at the time of transfer of control of merchandise. The Company considers several control indicators in its assessment of the timing of the transfer of control, including significant risks and rewards of ownership, physical possession and the Company’s right to receive payment. Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for transferring merchandise. Reserves for projected merchandise returns, discounts and allowances are determined based on historical experience and current expectations. Revenue is recognized on license fees related to Company-owned brand names, where the Company is the licensor, when the related sales of the licensee are made. The Company applies the guidance using the portfolio approach in ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, because this methodology would not differ materially from applying the guidance to the individual contracts within the portfolio. The Company excludes sales and similar taxes collected from customers from the measurement of the transaction price for its retail sales.
Gift Cards
The Company sells gift cards to its customers in its retail stores, through its e-commerce sites and at other retailers. The Company’s gift cards do not have expiration dates or inactivity fees. The Company recognizes revenue from gift cards when (i) the gift card is redeemed by the consumer or (ii) the likelihood of the gift card being redeemed by the consumer is remote (“gift card breakage”) and the Company determines that it does not have a legal obligation to remit the value of unredeemed gift cards to the relevant jurisdictions. The gift card breakage rate is determined based upon historical redemption patterns. Gift card breakage is recognized during the 24-month period following the sale of the gift card, according to the Company’s historical redemption pattern. Gift card breakage income is included in net sales in the consolidated statements of earnings (loss) and the liability established upon the sale of a gift card is included in other accrued expenses within the consolidated balance sheets. The Company recognized gift card breakage of $0.7 million, $1.1 million and $0.9 million in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Loyalty Program
The Company maintains a loyalty program at Famous Footwear, through which consumers earn points toward savings certificates for qualifying purchases. Upon reaching specified point values, consumers are issued a savings certificate that may be redeemed for purchases at Famous Footwear. Savings certificates earned must be redeemed within stated expiration dates. In addition to the savings certificates, the Company also offers exclusive member discounts. The value of points and rewards earned by Famous Footwear’s loyalty program members are recorded as a reduction of net sales and a liability is established within other accrued expenses at the time the points are earned based on historical conversion and
56
redemption rates. Approximately 79% of net sales in the Famous Footwear segment were made to its loyalty program members in 2020, compared to 78% in 2019. As of January 30, 2021 and February 1, 2020, the Company had a loyalty program liability of $14.0 million and $16.4 million, respectively, which is included in other accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets.
The Company regularly analyzes the results of all of its stores and assesses the viability of underperforming stores to determine whether events or circumstances exist that indicate the stores should be closed or whether the carrying amount of their long-lived assets may not be recoverable. After allowing for an appropriate start-up period, unusual nonrecurring events or favorable trends, property and equipment at stores and, beginning in 2019, the lease right-of-use asset, indicated as impaired are written down to fair value as calculated using a discounted cash flow method. The Company recorded asset impairment charges, primarily related to underperforming retail stores, of $56.3 million in 2020, $5.9 million in 2019 and $3.7 million in 2018. Impairment charges in 2019 were higher as a result of the adoption of ASC 842, Leases, in the first quarter of 2019, as further discussed in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements. In addition, the Company’s impairment charges were impacted in 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Advertising and Marketing Expense
Advertising and marketing costs are expensed as incurred, except for the costs of direct response advertising that relate primarily to the production and distribution of the Company’s catalogs and coupon mailers. Direct response advertising costs are capitalized and amortized over the expected future revenue stream, which is generally one to three months from the date the materials are mailed. External production costs of advertising are expensed when the advertising first appears in the media or in the store.
In addition, the Company participates in co-op advertising programs with certain of its wholesale customers. For those co-op advertising programs where the Company has validated the fair value of the advertising received, co-op advertising costs are reflected as advertising expense within selling and administrative expenses. Otherwise, co-op advertising costs are reflected as a reduction of net sales.
Total advertising and marketing expense was $77.9 million, $100.9 million and $84.8 million in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These costs were offset by co-op advertising allowances recovered by the Company’s retail business of $3.4 million, $7.8 million and $7.6 million in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Total co-op advertising costs reflected as a reduction of net sales were $7.2 million in 2020, $13.3 million in 2019 and $9.4 million in 2018. Total advertising costs attributable to future periods that are deferred and recognized as a component of prepaid expenses and other current assets were $4.6 million and $2.8 million at January 30, 2021 and February 1, 2020, respectively.
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of its assets and liabilities. The Company establishes valuation allowances if it believes that it is more-likely-than-not that some or all of its deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company does not recognize a tax benefit unless it concludes that it is more-likely-than-not that the benefit will be sustained on audit by the taxing authority based solely on the technical merits of the associated tax position. If the recognition threshold is met, the Company recognizes a tax benefit measured at the largest amount of the tax benefit that, in its judgment, is greater than 50% likely to be realized. The Company records interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax positions within the income tax benefit (provision) on the consolidated statements of earnings (loss). As further discussed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, the CARES Act was signed into law in March 2020. The CARES Act modified certain provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, including the five-year carryback period for net operating losses incurred in 2018, 2019 and 2020 tax years, which permits the Company to carry back net operating losses from years with a statutory 21% federal tax rate to years when the rate was 35%. During 2020, the Company recorded a net income tax benefit of $8.2 million related to the carryback of the 2020 net operating loss.
Operating Leases
The Company leases all of its retail locations, a manufacturing facility and certain office locations, distribution centers and equipment under operating leases. Approximately 40% of the leases entered into by the Company include options that
allow the Company to extend the lease term beyond the initial commitment period, subject to terms agreed to at lease inception. Some leases also include early termination options that can be exercised under specific conditions. As further discussed in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements, during the first quarter of 2019, the Company adopted ASC 842 using the modified retrospective transition method. In accordance with ASC 842, lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term. The majority of the Company’s leases do not provide an implicit rate and therefore, the Company uses an incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the commencement date, including implied traded debt yield and seniority adjustments, to determine the present value of future payments. Lease expense for the minimum lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Variable lease payments are expensed as incurred. As further discussed below, the Company has elected to account for COVID-19-related lease concessions as though the enforceable rights and obligations existed in the original lease and accordingly, has treated these lease concessions as variable rent.
Contingent Rentals
Many of the leases covering retail stores require contingent rental payments in addition to the minimum monthly rental charge based on retail sales volume. Subsequent to the adoption of ASC 842 in the first quarter of 2019, the Company excludes from lease payments any variable payments that are not based on an index or market. If payment for a lease is fully contingent on sales, such as a percentage of sales gross rent lease, none of the lease payments are included in the lease right-of-use asset or the lease liability. In accordance with ASC 840, the Company recorded expense for contingent rentals during the period in which the retail sales volume exceeded the respective targets.
Construction Allowances Received From Landlords
At the time its retail facilities are initially leased, the Company often receives consideration from landlords to be applied against the cost of leasehold improvements necessary to open the store. The Company treats these construction allowances as a lease incentive. In accordance with ASC 842, the allowances are recorded within the lease right-of-use asset and amortized to income over the lease term as a reduction of rent expense.
Straight-Line Rents and Rent Holidays
The Company records rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term for all of its leased facilities. For leases that have predetermined fixed escalations of the minimum rentals, the Company recognizes the related rental expense on a straight-line basis and records the difference between the recognized rental expense and amounts payable under the lease as the lease right-of-use asset, or under the guidance in ASC 840, as deferred rent. At the time its retail facilities are leased, the Company is frequently not charged rent for a specified period of time, typically 30 to 60 days, while the store is being prepared for opening. This rent-free period is referred to as a rent holiday. The Company recognizes rent expense over the lease term, including any rent holiday, within selling and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of earnings (loss).
Pre-opening Costs
Pre-opening costs associated with opening retail stores, including payroll, supplies and facility costs, are expensed as incurred.
(Loss) Earnings Per Common Share Attributable to Caleres, Inc. Shareholders
The Company uses the two-class method to calculate basic and diluted (loss) earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders. Unvested restricted stock awards are considered participating units because they entitle holders to non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents during the vesting term. Under the two-class method, basic (loss) earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders is computed by dividing the net (loss) earnings attributable to Caleres, Inc. after allocation of earnings to participating securities by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted (loss) earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders is computed by dividing the net (loss) earnings attributable to Caleres, Inc. after allocation of earnings to participating securities by the weighted-average number of common shares and potential dilutive securities outstanding during the year. Potential dilutive securities consist of outstanding stock options and contingently issuable shares for the Company’s performance share awards. Refer to Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to the calculation of (loss) earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders.
58
Comprehensive (Loss) Income
Comprehensive (loss) income includes the effect of foreign currency translation adjustments, pension and other postretirement benefits adjustments and unrealized gains or losses from derivatives used for hedging activities.
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment
For certain of the Company’s international subsidiaries, the local currency is the functional currency. Assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries are translated into United States dollars at the period-end exchange rate or historical rates as appropriate. Consolidated statements of earnings (loss) amounts are translated at average exchange rates for the period. The cumulative translation adjustments resulting from changes in exchange rates are included in the consolidated balance sheets as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in total Caleres, Inc. shareholders’ equity. Transaction gains and losses are included in the consolidated statements of earnings (loss).
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits Adjustments
The Company determines the expense and obligations for retirement and other benefit plans using assumptions related to discount rates, expected long-term rates of return on invested plan assets, expected salary increases and certain employee-related factors. The Company determines the fair value of plan assets and benefit obligations as of the January 31 measurement date. The unrecognized portion of the gain or loss on plan assets is included in the consolidated balance sheets as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in total Caleres, Inc. shareholders’ equity and is recognized into the plans’ expense over time. Refer to additional information related to pension and other postretirement benefits in Note 6 and Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company recognizes all derivative financial instruments as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets and measures those instruments at fair value. The Company evaluates its exposure to volatility in foreign currency rates and may enter into derivative transactions. These derivative financial instruments are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes. Refer to additional information related to derivative financial instruments in Note 14, Note 15 and Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements.
Litigation Contingencies
The Company is the defendant in several claims and lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company believes the outcome of such proceedings and litigation currently pending will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations. The Company accrues its best estimate of the cost of resolution of these claims. Legal defense costs of such claims are recognized in the period in which the costs are incurred. Refer to Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of commitments and contingencies.
Environmental Matters
The Company is involved in environmental remediation and ongoing compliance activities at several sites. The Company is remediating, under the oversight of Colorado authorities, the groundwater and indoor air at its owned facility and residential neighborhoods adjacent to and near the property, which have been affected by solvents previously used at the facility. In addition, various federal and state authorities have identified the Company as a potentially responsible party for remediation at certain other sites. The Company’s prior operations included numerous manufacturing and other facilities for which the Company may have responsibility under various environmental laws to address conditions that may be identified in the future. Refer to Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for a further description of specific properties.
Environmental expenditures relating to an existing condition caused by past operations and that do not contribute to current or future revenue generation are expensed. Based upon independent environmental assessments, liabilities are recorded when remedial action is considered probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated and are evaluated independently of any future claims recovery. Generally, the timing of these accruals coincides with completion of a feasibility study or our commitment to a formal plan of action, and our estimates of cost are subject to change as new information becomes available. Costs of future expenditures for environmental remediation obligations are discounted to their present value in those situations requiring only continuing maintenance and monitoring based upon a schedule of fixed payments.
59
Share-Based Compensation
The Company has share-based incentive compensation plans under which certain officers, employees and members of the Board of Directors are participants and may be granted restricted stock, stock performance awards and stock options. Additionally, share-based grants may be made to non-employee members of the Board of Directors in the form of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) payable in cash or the Company’s common stock. The Company accounts for share-based compensation in accordance with the fair value recognition provisions of ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation, and ASC 505, Equity, which require all share-based payments to employees and members of the Board of Directors, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized as expense in the consolidated financial statements based on their fair values. The fair value of stock options is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing formula that requires assumptions for expected volatility, expected dividends, the risk-free interest rate and the expected term of the option. Stock options generally vest over four years, with 25% vesting annually and expense is recognized on a straight-line basis separately for each vesting portion of the stock option award. Expense for restricted stock is based on the fair value of the restricted stock on the date of grant. Expense for graded-vesting grants is recognized ratably over the respective vesting periods and expense for cliff-vesting grants is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period, which is generally four years. Expense for stock performance awards is recognized based upon the fair value of the awards on the date of grant and the anticipated number of shares or units to be awarded on a straight-line basis over the respective term of the award, or individual vesting portion of an award. Expense for the initial grant of RSUs is recognized ratably over the one-year vesting period based upon the fair value of the RSUs, and for cash-equivalent RSUs, is remeasured at the end of each period. The Company accounts for forfeitures of share-based grants as they occur. If any of the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model or the anticipated number of shares to be awarded change significantly, share-based compensation expense may differ materially in the future from that recorded in the current period. Refer to additional information related to share-based compensation in Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Supplemental Disclosures
The Company had refunds for federal, state and international taxes, net of payments, of $0.6 million in 2020 and made payments, net of refunds, of $10.2 million, and $21.3 million in 2019 and 2018, respectively. Refer to Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements for further information regarding income taxes.
Cash payments of interest for the Company’s borrowings under the revolving credit agreement and long-term debt during 2020, 2019 and 2018 were $23.6 million, $26.8 million and $17.4 million, respectively. Refer to Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion regarding the Company’s financing arrangements.
Impact of Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326), which significantly changes how entities measure credit losses for most financial assets and certain other instruments that are not measured at fair value through net income. The ASU replaces the "incurred loss" model with an "expected credit loss" model that requires entities to estimate an expected lifetime credit loss on financial assets, including trade accounts receivable. The Company adopted the ASU in the first quarter of 2020 on a modified retrospective basis. Upon adoption, the Company recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings of $2.1 million, net of $0.4 million in deferred taxes. The Company recorded a provision for expected credit losses of $10.6 million during 2020, primarily as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and deteriorating financial conditions at many of the Company’s wholesale customers.
The following table summarizes the activity in the Company’s allowance for expected credit losses for the year ended January 30, 2021:
Balance at February 1, 2020
1,813
Adjustment upon adoption of ASU 2016-13
2,521
Provision for credit losses
Uncollectible accounts written-off, net of recoveries
(19)
Balance at January 30, 2021
14,928
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework — Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 modifies disclosure requirements on fair value measurements, removing and modifying certain disclosures, while adding other disclosures. The Company adopted the ASU during the first quarter of 2020, which did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statement disclosures. Refer to Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements for detail regarding the Company’s fair value measurements.
In March 2020, the SEC issued SEC Release No. 33-10762, Financial Disclosures about Guarantors and Issuers of Guaranteed Securities and Affiliates Whose Securities Collateralize a Registrant’s Securities, which is effective for filings on or after January 4, 2021, with early application permitted. The final rule amends the disclosure requirements in SEC Regulation S-X, Rule 3-10, which required entities to separately present financial statements for subsidiary issuers and guarantors of registered debt securities unless certain exceptions are met. The rule permits entities to provide summarized financial information of the parent company and its issuers and guarantors on a combined basis in either a note to the financial statements or in management’s discussion and analysis. The Company adopted the rule during the second quarter of 2020 and elected to provide the summarized financial information in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. In October 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-09, Debt (Topic 470): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-10762, to reflect the new disclosure requirements in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.
In April 2020, the FASB issued interpretive guidance indicating that entities may elect not to evaluate whether a concession provided by lessors is a lease modification. Under existing lease guidance, an entity would be required to determine if a lease concession was the result of a new arrangement reached with the landlord, which would be accounted for under the lease modification framework, or if the concession was under the enforceable rights and obligations that existed in the original lease, it would be accounted for outside the lease modification framework. The FASB guidance provides entities with the option to elect to account for COVID-19-related lease concessions as though the enforceable rights and obligations existed in the original lease. The Company has elected to treat these lease concessions as variable rent. Accordingly, COVID-19-related lease concessions totaling $5.4 million for the year ended January 30, 2021 were recorded as a reduction of rent expense within selling and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of earnings (loss). Refer to Note 13 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion regarding the Company’s leases.
In November 2020, the SEC issued SEC Release No. 33-10890, Management’s Discussion and Analysis, Selected Financial Data and Supplementary Financial Information. The rule amends existing requirements in Regulation S-K for disclosures related to management’s discussion and analysis and certain financial disclosure requirements. The rule is effective for filings after August 9, 2021, with early adoption permitted on an item-by-item basis. The Company has adopted the amendments associated with Items 301 and 302 of the rule and accordingly, has eliminated the selected financial data in Item 6 as well as the supplementary financial information that was previously included in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14, Compensation — Retirement Benefits — Defined Benefit Plans — General (Subtopic 715-20), Disclosure Framework — Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans. The guidance changes the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement benefit plans, eliminating the requirements for certain disclosures that are no longer considered cost beneficial and requiring new disclosures that the FASB considers pertinent. The ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of ASU 2018-14 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statement disclosures.
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes. ASU 2019-12 eliminates certain exceptions related to intraperiod tax allocation, simplifies certain elements of accounting for basis differences and deferred tax liabilities during a business combination, and standardizes the classification of franchise taxes. The ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of ASU 2019-12 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
2. ACQUISITIONS
Acquisition of Blowfish, LLC
On July 6, 2018, the Company entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement ("Purchase Agreement") with Blowfish, LLC ("Blowfish Malibu"), pursuant to which the Company acquired a controlling interest in Blowfish Malibu. The noncontrolling interest is subject to a mandatory purchase obligation after a three-year period based upon an earnings multiple formula, as specified in the Purchase Agreement. The aggregate purchase price was estimated to be $28.0 million, including approximately $9.0 million initially assigned to the mandatory purchase obligation, which will be paid upon settlement in 2021. The remaining $19.0 million (or $16.8 million, net of $2.2 million of cash received) was funded with cash. The initial $9.0 million estimate of the mandatory purchase obligation was valued on a discounted basis and is subject to remeasurement based on the earnings formula specified in the Purchase Agreement. As of January 30, 2021, the fair value of the mandatory purchase obligation of $39.1 million is presented within current liabilities, reflecting the anticipated settlement in the third quarter of 2021. As of February 1, 2020, the mandatory purchase obligation was valued at $15.2 million and was presented within other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. Accretion and remeasurement adjustments on the mandatory purchase obligation are being recorded as interest expense and totaled $23.9 million and $6.0 million in 2020 and 2019, respectively. The operating results of Blowfish Malibu since July 6, 2018 have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements within the Brand Portfolio segment, with the elimination of sales and profit for sales to the Famous Footwear segment reflected in the Eliminations and Other category.
Acquisition of Vionic
On October 18, 2018, the Company entered into an Equity and Asset Purchase Agreement (the "Agreement") with the equity holders of Vionic Group LLC and Vionic International LLC, and VCG Holdings Ltd., a Cayman Islands corporation (collectively, "Vionic"), pursuant to which the Company acquired all of the outstanding equity interests of Vionic Group LLC and Vionic International LLC and certain related intellectual property from VCG Holdings Ltd for $360.0 million plus adjustments for cash and indebtedness, as defined in the Agreement. The aggregate purchase price was $360.7 million (or $352.7 million, net of $8.0 million of cash received). The purchase was funded with borrowings from the Company’s revolving credit agreement. The operating results of Vionic since October 18, 2018 have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements within the Brand Portfolio segment, with the elimination of sales and profits for sales to the Famous Footwear segment reflected in the Eliminations and Other category.
The Company recognized Vionic acquisition and integration-related costs of $5.8 million ($4.3 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.10 per diluted share) and $8.9 million ($6.6 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.15 per diluted share) for the incremental cost of goods sold in 2019 and 2018, respectively, related to the amortization of the inventory fair value adjustment required for purchase accounting. There were no corresponding charges in 2020. In addition, the Company incurred acquisition and integration-related costs of $3.4 million ($2.6 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.07 per diluted share), $1.9 million ($1.4 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.03 per diluted share) and $4.5 million ($3.3 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.08 per diluted share) in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Of the $3.4 million of costs incurred in 2020, which were recorded as a component of restructuring and other special charges, $3.3 million is presented within the Brand Portfolio segment and $0.1 million is presented in the Eliminations and Other category. Of the $1.9 million of costs incurred in 2019, $1.8 million is presented within the Eliminations and Other category and $0.1 million is presented in the Brand Portfolio segment and recorded as a component of restructuring and other special charges, net. All of the 2018 costs are reflected within the Eliminations and Other category. Refer to Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to these costs.
62
3. REVENUES
Disaggregation of Revenues
The following table disaggregates revenue by segment and major source for 2020, 2019 and 2018:
Eliminations and
Retail stores
983,669
52,796
1,036,465
Landed wholesale - e-commerce - drop ship (1)
87,226
(4,192)
83,034
E-commerce - Company websites (1)
279,353
149,090
428,443
Total direct-to-consumer sales
1,263,022
289,112
1,547,942
First-cost wholesale - e-commerce (1)
1,249
Landed wholesale - e-commerce (1)
124,548
Landed wholesale - other
408,752
(44,770)
363,982
First-cost wholesale
69,172
Licensing and royalty
9,478
Other (2)
529
699
Total net sales
1,263,551
902,481
(48,962)
1,427,473
154,549
1,582,022
93,249
159,724
145,897
305,621
1,587,197
393,695
1,980,892
2,204
190,536
708,262
(72,955)
635,307
96,021
15,469
860
1,133
1,588,057
1,406,460
1,469,857
166,903
1,636,760
61,518
136,327
125,877
262,204
1,606,184
354,298
1,960,482
1,086
155,637
690,988
(85,513)
605,475
94,734
16,501
307
931
1,606,808
1,313,551
The majority of the Company’s revenue is generated from retail sales where control is transferred and revenue is recognized at the point of sale. Retail sales are recorded net of estimated returns and exclude sales tax. The Company carries a returns reserve and a corresponding return asset for expected returns of merchandise.
Retail sales to members of the Company’s loyalty programs, including the Famously You Rewards program, include two performance obligations: the sale of merchandise and the delivery of points that may be redeemed for future purchases. The transaction price is allocated to the separate performance obligations based on the relative stand-alone selling price. The stand-alone selling price for the points is estimated using the retail value of the merchandise earned, adjusted for estimated breakage based upon historical redemption patterns. The Company disregards the effect of the time value of money between payment for and receipt of goods when the sale does not include a financing element. The revenue associated with the initial merchandise purchased is recognized immediately and the value assigned to the points is deferred until the points are redeemed, forfeited or expired.
Landed wholesale
Landed sales are wholesale sales in which the merchandise is shipped directly to the customer from the Company’s warehouses. Many landed customers arrange their own transportation of merchandise and, with limited exceptions, control is transferred at the time of shipment.
First-cost sales are wholesale sales in which the Company purchases merchandise from an international factory that manufactures the product and subsequently sells to a customer at an overseas port. Revenue is recognized at the time the merchandise is delivered to the customer’s designated freight forwarder and control is transferred to the customer.
E-commerce
The Company also generates revenue from sales on websites maintained by the Company that are shipped from the Company’s distribution centers or retail stores directly to the consumer, picked up directly by the consumer from the Company’s stores and e-commerce sales from the Company’s wholesale customers’ websites that are fulfilled on a drop-ship or first cost basis (collectively referred to as "e-commerce"). The Company transfers control and recognizes revenue for merchandise sold that is shipped directly to an individual consumer upon delivery to the consumer.
The Company has license agreements with third parties allowing them to sell the Company’s branded product, or other merchandise that uses the Company’s owned or licensed brand names. These license agreements provide the licensee
64
access to the Company’s symbolic intellectual property, and revenue is therefore recognized over the license term. For royalty contracts that do not have guaranteed minimums, the Company recognizes revenue as the licensee’s sales occur. For royalty contracts that have guaranteed minimums, revenue for the guaranteed minimum is recognized on a straight-line basis during the term, until such time that the cumulative royalties exceed the total minimum guarantee. Up-front payments are recognized over the contractual term to which the guaranteed minimum relates.
Contract Balances
Revenue is recorded at the transaction price, net of estimates for variable consideration for which reserves are established, including returns, allowances and discounts. Variable consideration is estimated using the expected value method and given the large number of contracts with similar characteristics, the portfolio approach is applied to determine the variable consideration for each revenue stream. Reserves for projected returns are based on historical patterns and current expectations.
Information about significant contract balances from contracts with customers is as follows:
Customer allowances and discounts
17,043
26,200
Loyalty programs liability
13,986
16,405
Returns reserve
11,040
14,033
Gift card liability
6,091
5,742
Changes in contract balances with customers generally reflect differences in relative sales volume for the period presented. In addition, during 2020, the loyalty programs liability increased $26.4 million due to points and material rights accrued for purchases and decreased $28.8 million due to expirations and redemptions. During 2019, the loyalty programs liability increased $27.8 million due to points and material rights accrued for purchases and decreased $26.0 million due to expirations and redemptions.
4. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
The Company uses the two-class method to compute basic and diluted (loss) earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders. In periods of net loss, no effect is given to the Company’s participating securities since they do not contractually participate in the losses of the Company. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders:
NUMERATOR
Net (earnings) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
(120)
737
Net earnings allocated to participating securities
(1,988)
Net (loss) earnings attributable to Caleres, Inc. after allocation of earnings to participating securities
60,831
DENOMINATOR
Denominator for basic (loss) earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders
37,220
39,796
41,756
Dilutive effect of share-based awards
Denominator for diluted (loss) earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders
39,853
Options to purchase 22,667 and 16,667 shares of common stock in 2020 and 2019, respectively, were not included in the denominator for diluted (loss) earnings per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders because the effect would be antidilutive. There were no options to purchase shares excluded from the denominator in 2018. Due to the Company’s net loss attributable to Caleres, Inc. in 2020 and 2018, the denominator for diluted loss per common share attributed to Caleres, Inc. shareholders is the same as the denominator for basic loss per common share attributable to Caleres, Inc. shareholders.
The Company repurchased 2,902,122, 1,704,240 and 1,465,649 shares at a cost of $23.3 million, $33.4 million and $43.8 million during the years ended January 30, 2021, February 1, 2020 and February 2, 2019, respectively, under the 2011, 2018 and 2019 publicly announced share repurchase programs. The 2011 and 2018 repurchase programs permit repurchases of up to 2.5 million shares and the 2019 repurchase program permits repurchases of up to 5.0 million shares, as further discussed in Item 5, Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
5. RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER INITIATIVES
COVID-19-Related Impairments and Expenses
The Company incurred costs associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and related impacts on the Company’s business, totaling $114.3 million ($115.5 million on an after-tax basis, or $3.10 per diluted share) during 2020. These costs included non-cash impairment of property and equipment and lease right-of-use assets, incremental inventory markdowns, employee severance and other direct expenses specific to the impact of COVID-19 on the Company’s operations. Of the $114.3 million in charges, $80.9 million is presented in restructuring and other special charges, net and $33.4 million is
66
reflected as cost of goods sold in the consolidated statements of earnings (loss). Of the $80.9 million reflected as restructuring and other special charges, $63.7 million is reflected in the Brand Portfolio segment, $16.6 million is reflected in the Famous Footwear segment and $0.6 million is reflected within the Eliminations and Other category. The $33.4 million reflected as cost of goods sold represents incremental inventory markdowns, of which $27.4 million is reflected in the Brand Portfolio segment and $6.0 million is reflected in the Famous Footwear segment. There were no corresponding charges in 2019 or 2018.
Blowfish Mandatory Purchase Obligation
In 2018, the Company acquired a controlling interest in Blowfish Malibu, as further discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. The noncontrolling interest is subject to a mandatory purchase obligation after a three-year period based upon an earnings multiple formula as specified in the purchase agreement. Accretion and remeasurement adjustments on the mandatory purchase obligation are being recorded as interest expense. The fair value adjustments on the mandatory purchase obligation totaled $23.9 million ($17.8 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.48 per diluted share) in 2020 and $5.4 million ($4.0 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.10 per diluted share) in 2019. Refer to further discussion regarding the mandatory purchase obligation in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements.
Brand Portfolio – Business Exits
During 2020, the Company incurred costs of $16.4 million ($14.9 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.40 per diluted share) related to the decision to close all but a limited number of its Naturalizer retail stores and exit the Fergie brand. Of these charges, which are all reflected within the Brand Portfolio segment, $12.4 million is presented as restructuring and other special charges and primarily represents non-cash impairment of property and right-of-use lease assets, incremental rent and lease termination costs, and severance costs. An additional $4.0 million is presented as cost of goods sold and represents the incremental inventory markdowns required to reduce the value of inventory for these two brands to net realizable value. As of January 30, 2021, reserves of $2.1 million were included in other accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheet.
During 2019, the Company incurred costs of $3.5 million ($2.6 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.06 per diluted share) related to the decision to exit the Carlos brand and reposition the Via Spiga brand. Of these charges, which are all reflected within the Brand Portfolio segment, $3.0 million relates to incremental inventory markdowns required to reduce the value of inventory to net realizable value and is presented in cost of goods sold on the consolidated statements of earnings (loss), while the remaining $0.5 million, which is presented in restructuring and other special charges, is for severance and other related costs.
During 2018, the Company incurred costs of $2.4 million ($1.8 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.04 per diluted share) related to the decision to exit the Diane von Furstenberg and George Brown Bilt brands. Of these charges, which are all reflected within the Brand Portfolio segment, $1.8 million primarily represents incremental inventory markdowns required to reduce the value of inventory to net realizable value and is presented in cost of goods sold on the consolidated statements of earnings (loss), while the remaining $0.6 million is for severance and other related costs and presented in restructuring and other special charges.
Vionic Acquisition and Integration-Related Costs
On October 18, 2018, the Company acquired all of the outstanding equity interests of Vionic Group LLC and Vionic International LLC, as further discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. The Company incurred acquisition and integration-related costs associated with the acquisition totaling $3.4 million ($2.6 million on an after-tax basis, $0.07 per diluted share), $1.9 million ($1.4 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.03 per diluted share) and $4.5 million ($3.3 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.08 per diluted share) during 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Of the $3.4 million in charges in 2020, which were presented as restructuring and other special charges in the consolidated statements of earnings (loss), $3.3 million is reflected within the Brand Portfolio segment and $0.1 million is reflected within the Eliminations and Other category, and represent non-cash impairment of assets, severance and other related costs. Of the $1.9 million in charges in 2019 presented as restructuring and other special charges, which were primarily for severance and professional fees, $1.8 million is reflected within the Eliminations and Other category and $0.1 million is reflected in the Brand Portfolio segment. All of the 2018 charges, which were primarily for professional fees, are reflected within the Eliminations and Other category.
67
Expense Containment Initiatives
During the fourth quarter of 2019, the Company announced expense containment initiatives, including a Voluntary Early Retirement Program ("VERP") and other restructuring actions. The total costs to implement these initiatives, which were recorded in the fourth quarter of 2019, were $15.0 million ($11.2 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.27 per diluted share). These costs included employee-related costs for severance, including health care benefits and enhanced pension benefits. Of the $15.0 million in charges, $12.3 million is presented as restructuring and other special charges, net and $2.7 million is reflected as other income, net in the consolidated statements of earnings (loss). Of the $12.3 million reflected as restructuring and other special charges, $5.0 million is reflected in the Brand Portfolio segment, $3.8 million is reflected within the Eliminations and Other category and $3.5 million is reflected in the Famous Footwear segment. The $2.7 million presented in other income within the Eliminations and Other category is a one-time pension settlement charge and special termination benefit costs associated with the VERP, as further discussed in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements. As of February 1, 2020, reserves of $8.0 million were included in other accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets, with no corresponding reserves as of January 30, 2021.
Integration and Reorganization of Men’s Brands
During 2018, the Company incurred integration and reorganization costs related to the 2016 acquisition of Allen Edmonds, primarily for professional fees and severance, totaling $5.8 million ($4.3 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.10 per diluted share), related to the men’s business. These charges are presented in restructuring and other special charges in the consolidated statement of earnings (loss). Of the $5.8 million of costs in 2018, $5.4 million is included in the Brand Portfolio segment and $0.4 million is reflected within the Eliminations and Other category.
Logistics Transition
During the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company incurred costs of $4.5 million ($3.3 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.08 per diluted share) associated with the transition from a third-party operated warehouse in Chino, California to new company-operated Brand Portfolio warehouse facilities in California, as well as the transition of the Allen Edmonds distribution center in Port Washington, Wisconsin to the Company’s existing retail distribution center in Lebanon, Tennessee. These charges are presented as restructuring and other special charges within the Brand Portfolio segment.
Retail Operations Restructuring
During 2018, the Company incurred costs, primarily for severance expense, of $0.4 million ($0.3 million on an after-tax basis, or $0.01 per diluted share), related to restructuring of its retail operations, which are presented in restructuring and other special charges in the consolidated statements of earnings (loss). All of the costs for 2018 are presented within the Famous Footwear segment.
6. RETIREMENT AND OTHER BENEFIT PLANS
The Company sponsors pension plans in both the United States and Canada. Under the domestic plans, salaried, management and certain hourly employees’ pension benefits are based on a two-rate formula applied to each year of service. Participants receive the larger of the accrued benefit as of December 31, 2015 (based on service commencing at the date of hire and a 35-year service cap and an average annual salary for the five highest consecutive years during the last 10 year period) and the benefit calculated under the current plan provisions from the date of hire. Generally, under the current plan provisions, a participant receives credit for one year of service for each 365 days of employment as an eligible employee with the Company commencing after the employee’s date of participation in the plan, up to 30 years. Beginning in 2019, except for grandfathered employees and certain hourly associates in the Company’s retail divisions, final average compensation, taxable covered compensation and credit service for purposes of determining accrued pension benefits were frozen as of December 31, 2018.
The Company’s Canadian pension plans cover certain employees based on plan specifications. Under the Canadian plans, employees’ pension benefits are based on the employee’s highest consecutive five years of compensation during the 10 years before retirement. The Company’s funding policy for all plans is to make the minimum annual contributions required by applicable regulations. The Company also maintains an unfunded Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”). In addition to providing pension benefits, the Company sponsors unfunded postretirement life insurance plans that cover both salaried and hourly employees who became eligible for benefits by January 1, 1995. The life insurance plans provide coverage of up to $20,000 for qualifying retired employees.
68
Benefit Obligations
The following table sets forth changes in benefit obligations, including all domestic and Canadian plans:
Pension Benefits
Other Postretirement Benefits
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
388,288
342,192
1,371
1,461
Service cost
8,492
7,219
Interest cost
12,205
14,811
Plan participants’ contribution
Plan amendments
93
Actuarial loss (gain)
8,710
58,278
(55)
(39)
Benefits paid
(15,272)
(14,399)
(112)
(117)
Settlements
(36,747)
(20,263)
Contractual termination benefits
482
Curtailments
(95)
(90)
Foreign exchange rate changes
(18)
(44)
Benefit obligation at end of year
365,570
The accumulated benefit obligation for the United States pension plans was $358.7 million and $379.9 million as of January 30, 2021 and February 1, 2020, respectively. The accumulated benefit obligation for the Canadian pension plans was $4.0 million and $4.3 million as of January 30, 2021 and February 1, 2020, respectively.
Weighted–average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations, end of year
Discount rate
3.10
3.25
Rate of compensation increase
3.00
N/A
As of January 30, 2021, the Company is using the PRI-2012 Bottom Quartile mortality table, projected using generational scale MP-2020, an updated base mortality table issued by the Society of Actuaries in 2020, to estimate the plan liabilities. Actuarial losses, related to the change in mortality projection scales from the MP-2019 scale used in 2019, increased the projected benefit obligation by approximately $2.0 million as of January 30, 2021.
In the fourth quarter of 2020, a lump sum option was offered to certain former employees, resulting in $35.7 million of lump sum payments and a settlement charge that decreased the net periodic benefit income for 2020 by $1.1 million. During the fourth quarter of 2019, in conjunction with the Company’s expense containment initiatives, a Voluntary Early Retirement Program ("VERP") was offered to pension participants who met certain criteria. A lump sum option was also offered to certain former employees during the fourth quarter of 2019. The VERP and terminated vested lump sums resulted in $19.9 million of lump sum payments, and a settlement charge and curtailment that decreased the net periodic benefit income for 2019 by $2.7 million.
Plan Assets
Pension assets are managed in accordance with the prudent investor standards of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). The plan’s investment objective is to earn a competitive total return on assets, while also ensuring plan assets are adequately managed to provide for future pension obligations. This results in the protection of plan surplus and is accomplished by matching the duration of the projected benefit obligation using leveraged fixed income instruments and, while maintaining an equity commitment, managing an equity overlay strategy. The overlay strategy is intended to protect the managed equity portfolios against adverse stock market environments. The Company delegates investment management of the plan assets to specialists in each asset class and regularly monitors manager performance and compliance with investment guidelines. The Company’s overall investment strategy is to achieve a mix of approximately 97% of investments for long-term growth and 3% for near-term benefit payments with a wide diversification of asset types, fund strategies and fund managers. The target allocations for plan assets for 2020 were 70% equities and 30% debt
securities. Allocations may change periodically based upon changing market conditions. Corporate stocks – common did not include any Company stock at January 30, 2021 or February 1, 2020.
Assets of the Canadian pension plans, which total approximately $4.6 million at January 30, 2021, were invested 55% in equity funds, 42% in bond funds and 3% in money market funds. The Canadian pension plans did not include any Company stock as of January 30, 2021 or February 1, 2020.
A financial instrument’s level within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Refer to further discussion on the fair value hierarchy in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements. Following is a description of the pension plan investments measured at fair value, including the general classification of such investments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.
70
The fair values of the Company’s pension plan assets at January 30, 2021 by asset category are as follows:
Fair Value Measurements at January 30, 2021
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Asset
9,149
U.S. government securities
108,733
50,116
58,617
Interest rate swap agreements
(4,597)
Mutual fund
38,064
Exchange-traded funds
119,647
Corporate stocks - common
160,137
160,112
Preferred securities
2,495
S&P 500 Index options
(6,482)
Total investments in the fair value hierarchy
427,146
370,606
54,020
2,520
Investments measured at net asset value:
Alternative investment fund
17,522
Unallocated insurance contract
Total investments measured at net asset value
17,571
Total investments at fair value
444,717
The fair values of the Company’s pension plan assets at February 1, 2020 by asset category are as follows:
Fair Value Measurements at February 1, 2020
31,588
94,285
18,388
75,897
32,551
71,505
177,743
177,718
852
3,252
411,776
335,002
877
16,335
75
16,410
428,186
71
The following table sets forth changes in the fair value of plan assets, including all domestic and Canadian plans:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
381,450
Actual return on plan assets
67,413
81,282
Employer contributions
1,148
151
108
111
Plan participants’ contributions
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
Funded Status
The over-funded status as of January 30, 2021 and February 1, 2020 for pension benefits was $79.1 million and $39.9 million, respectively. The under-funded status as of January 30, 2021 and February 1, 2020 for other postretirement benefits was $1.2 million and $1.4 million, respectively.
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets consist of:
Prepaid pension costs (noncurrent assets)
Accrued benefit liabilities (current liability)
(1,896)
(2,405)
(194)
(200)
Accrued benefit liabilities (noncurrent liability)
(7,790)
(8,361)
(1,055)
(1,171)
Net amount recognized at end of year
79,147
39,894
(1,249)
(1,371)
The projected benefit obligation, the accumulated benefit obligation and the fair value of plan assets for pension plans with a projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets and for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets, which includes only the Company’s SERP, were as follows:
Projected Benefit Obligation Exceeds the
Accumulated Benefit Obligation
Fair Value of Plan Assets
Exceeds the Fair Value of Plan Assets
End of Year
Projected benefit obligation
9,686
10,766
Accumulated benefit obligation
8,954
9,516
Fair value of plan assets
The accumulated postretirement benefit obligation exceeds assets for all of the Company’s other postretirement benefit plans.
The amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss that have not yet been recognized as components of net periodic benefit income at January 30, 2021 and February 1, 2020 are as follows:
Components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax:
Net actuarial loss (gain)
10,438
33,771
(466)
(507)
Net prior service credit
(947)
(2,093)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax
9,491
31,678
72
Net Periodic Benefit Income
Net periodic benefit income for 2020, 2019 and 2018 for all domestic and Canadian plans included the following components:
8,995
14,236
Expected return on assets
(31,498)
(27,735)
(29,091)
Amortization of:
2,718
3,904
4,122
(110)
(107)
(125)
Prior service credit
(1,354)
(1,486)
(1,567)
Settlement cost
1,353
2,236
324
(189)
Cost of contractual termination benefits
Total net periodic benefit income
(8,273)
(569)
(2,981)
(69)
(47)
(66)
The non-service cost components of net periodic benefit income are included in other income, net in the consolidated statements of earnings (loss). Service cost is included in selling and administrative expenses.
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit income:
4.35
4.00
Expected return on plan assets
7.50
7.75
8.00
The net actuarial loss (gain) subject to amortization is amortized on a straight-line basis over the average future service of active plan participants as of the measurement date. The prior service credit is amortized on a straight-line basis over the average future service of active plan participants benefiting under the plan at the time of each plan amendment.
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based on historical and projected rates of return for current and planned asset classes in the plan’s investment portfolio. Assumed projected rates of return for each asset class were selected after analyzing experience and future expectations of the returns. The overall expected rate of return for the portfolio was developed based on the target allocation for each asset class.
73
Expected Cash Flows
Information about expected cash flows for all pension and postretirement benefit plans follows:
Postretirement
Funded Plan
SERP
Benefits
Employer Contributions
2021 expected contributions to plan trusts
2021 expected contributions to plan participants
1,925
197
2021 refund of assets (e.g. surplus) to employer
136
Expected Benefit Payments
2021
15,405
17,330
2022
16,883
1,465
18,348
167
2023
15,301
2,094
17,395
2024
15,694
247
15,941
119
2025
16,271
270
16,541
2026-2030
87,139
1,840
88,979
285
Defined Contribution Plans
The Company’s domestic defined contribution 401(k) plan covers salaried and certain hourly employees. Prior to certain plan changes that became effective on January 1, 2019, the Company’s contributions represented a partial matching of employee contributions, generally up to a maximum of 3.5% of the employee’s salary and bonus. Currently, for eligible salaried employees, the Company makes a core contribution of 1.5% and a matching contribution of up to 50% of the first 6% of the employees’ contributions. In addition, the Company has the discretion to contribute up to an additional 2% profit-sharing benefit based on the Company’s performance. The Company’s expense for this plan was $4.0 million in 2020, $5.4 million in 2019, and $4.4 million in 2018.
The Company’s Canadian defined contribution plan covers certain salaried and hourly employees. The Company makes contributions for all eligible employees, ranging from 3% to 5% of the employee’s salary. In addition, eligible employees may voluntarily contribute to the plan. The Company’s expense for this plan was $0.1 million in 2020, and $0.2 million in both 2019 and 2018.
Deferred Compensation Plan
The Company has a non-qualified deferred compensation plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”) for the benefit of certain management employees. The investment funds offered to the participants generally correspond to the funds offered in the Company’s 401(k) plan and the account balance fluctuates with the investment returns on those funds. The Deferred Compensation Plan permits the deferral of up to 50% of base salary and 100% of compensation received under the Company’s annual incentive plan. The deferrals are held in a separate trust, which has been established by the Company to administer the Deferred Compensation Plan. The assets of the trust are subject to the claims of the Company’s creditors in the event that the Company becomes insolvent. Consequently, the trust qualifies as a grantor trust for income tax purposes (i.e., a “Rabbi Trust”). The liabilities of the Deferred Compensation Plan of $7.9 million and $8.0 million as of January 30, 2021 and February 1, 2020, respectively, are presented in employee compensation and benefits in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The assets held by the trust of $7.9 million and $8.0 million as of January 30, 2021 and February 1, 2020, respectively, are presented within prepaid expenses and other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, with changes in the deferred compensation charged to selling and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings (loss).
Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors
Non-employee directors are eligible to participate in a deferred compensation plan, whereby deferred compensation amounts are valued as if invested in the Company’s common stock through the use of phantom stock units (“PSUs”). Under the plan, each participating director’s account is credited with the number of PSUs equal to the number of shares of the Company’s common stock that the participant could purchase or receive with the amount of the deferred compensation, based upon the fair value (as determined based on the average of the high and low prices) of the Company’s common
stock on the last trading day of the fiscal quarter when the cash compensation was earned. Dividend equivalents are paid on PSUs at the same rate as dividends on the Company’s common stock and are re-invested in additional PSUs at the next fiscal quarter-end. The PSUs are payable in cash based on the number of PSUs credited to the participating director’s account, valued on the basis of the fair value at fiscal quarter-end on or following termination of the director’s service. The liabilities of the plan of $1.0 million as of January 30, 2021 and $1.5 million as of February 1, 2020 are based on 23,644 and 71,108 outstanding PSUs, respectively, and are presented in other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Gains and losses resulting from changes in the fair value of the PSUs are charged to selling and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings (loss).
7. INCOME TAXES
On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) was signed into law. The CARES Act modified certain provisions to the Internal Revenue Code. Among the provisions modified by the CARES Act was a five-year carryback period for net operating losses incurred in the 2018, 2019 and 2020 tax years; temporary removal of the 80% limitation on net operating loss usage, reinstated for tax years after 2020; a temporary increase in the interest expense limitation and acceleration of refundable AMT credit. The five-year carryback presented an opportunity to carry back net operating losses from years with a statutory 21% federal tax rate to years when the rate was 35%. During 2020, the Company recorded a net income tax benefit of $8.2 million related to the carryback of the 2020 net operating loss.
The components of (loss) earnings before income taxes consisted of domestic loss before income taxes of $441.5 million in 2020 and domestic earnings before income taxes of $37.3 million and $40.0 million in 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Company’s international earnings before incomes taxes were $41.3 million in 2019 and international losses before income taxes were $75.6 million and $45.8 million in 2020 and 2018, respectively.
The components of income tax (benefit) provision on (loss) earnings were as follows:
Federal
Current
(37,140)
4,003
1,953
Deferred
(45,145)
5,390
4,451
Total federal income tax (benefit) provision
(82,285)
9,393
6,404
State
1,532
290
(718)
(9,038)
2,403
1,284
Total state income tax (benefit) provision
(7,506)
2,693
566
2,288
3,914
5,413
9,386
511
(12,656)
Total international income tax provision (benefit)
11,674
4,425
(7,243)
Total income tax (benefit) provision
(78,117)
16,511
(273)
The differences between the income tax (benefit) provision reflected in the consolidated financial statements and the amounts calculated at the federal statutory income tax rate were as follows:
Income taxes at statutory rate
(108,593)
16,505
(1,208)
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit
(17,433)
2,218
2,519
International earnings taxed at differing rates from U.S. statutory
(5,210)
(4,071)
(4,210)
Share-based compensation
1,094
86
(347)
Non-deductibility of goodwill impairment
20,179
7,989
Impairment of international trade name taxed at higher rate
(1,440)
(2,400)
Provision for valuation allowance
41,019
872
CARES Act NOL, net carryback benefit
(8,203)
Income tax reform, net benefit
(3,891)
GILTI, BEAT and FDII provisions
668
613
Non-deductibility of acquisition costs
Other (1)
470
233
616
In 2020, the Company’s effective tax rate was 15.1% in 2020, compared to 21.0% in 2019. In 2020, the Company’s effective tax rate was impacted by several discrete tax items, including the non-deductibility of a portion of its goodwill impairment charges and the incremental tax provision related to the vesting of stock awards. The Company’s tax benefit also includes the favorable impact of approximately $8.2 million related to the CARES Act, which permits the Company to carry back a significant portion of our 2020 losses to years with a higher federal tax rate, as discussed above. In 2019, the Company’s effective tax rate was impacted by discrete tax benefits totaling $1.4 million, primarily reflecting adjustments to changes in tax rates in state and other international jurisdictions. In 2018, the Company’s effective tax rate was impacted by several factors, including the non-deductibility of our goodwill impairment charge of $38.0 million. In addition, discrete tax benefits totaling $5.9 million were recognized in 2018, primarily reflecting adjustments associated with the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and related actions for state and other international jurisdictions (in aggregate, "income tax reform").
Significant components of the Company’s deferred income tax assets and liabilities were as follows:
Deferred Tax Assets
176,953
200,408
Goodwill and intangible assets
25,659
Net operating loss carryforward/carryback
20,736
6,671
Accrued expenses
18,610
18,762
Employee benefits, compensation and insurance
11,006
12,812
Accounts receivable
6,149
3,109
Inventory capitalization and inventory reserves
4,130
4,123
Impairment of investment in nonconsolidated affiliate
1,470
Postretirement and postemployment benefit plans
314
Capital loss carryforward
1,245
1,349
Total deferred tax assets, before valuation allowance
266,257
249,032
Valuation allowance
(49,981)
(4,809)
Total deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance
216,276
244,223
Deferred Tax Liabilities
(151,962)
(187,978)
LIFO inventory valuation
(38,437)
(44,774)
Retirement plans
(21,041)
(10,466)
(5,331)
(4,420)
(4,779)
(8,416)
(29,636)
(2,970)
(3,811)
Total deferred tax liabilities
(224,520)
(289,501)
Net deferred tax liability
(8,244)
(45,278)
As of January 30, 2021, the Company had various federal, state and international net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards with tax values totaling $20.7 million. The state NOLs totaling $11.6 million have carryforward periods ranging from one to 20 years. The planned carryback of the federal NOL released other tax attributes with a tax value of $4.4 million. The Company has NOLs in Canada and the United Kingdom of $3.0 million and $1.7 million, respectively. The Canada NOLs have carryforward periods ranging from 16 to 20 years, while the United Kingdom NOLs have no expiration. As of January 30, 2021, the Company is in a three-year cumulative loss position for federal, state and certain international tax jurisdictions. Accordingly, as of January 30, 2021, the Company increased its valuation allowances on deferred tax assets to $50.0 million, reflecting the uncertainty regarding the utilization of its deferred tax assets.
As of January 30, 2021, no deferred taxes have been provided on the accumulated unremitted earnings of the Company’s international subsidiaries that are not subject to United States income tax, beyond the amounts recorded for the one-time transition tax for the mandatory deemed repatriation of cumulative international earnings, as required by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The Company periodically evaluates its international investment opportunities and plans, as well as its international working capital needs, to determine the level of investment required and, accordingly, determines the level of international earnings that is considered indefinitely reinvested. Based upon that evaluation, earnings of the Company’s international subsidiaries that are not otherwise subject to United States taxation are considered to be indefinitely reinvested, and accordingly, deferred taxes have not been provided. If changes occur in future investment opportunities and plans, those changes will be reflected when known and may result in providing residual United States deferred taxes on unremitted international earnings. If the Company’s unremitted international earnings were not considered indefinitely reinvested as of January 30, 2021, an immaterial amount of additional deferred taxes would have been provided.
Uncertain Tax Positions
ASC 740, Income Taxes, establishes a single model to address accounting for uncertain tax positions. The standard clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet
77
before being recognized in the financial statements. The standard also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. As of January 30, 2021, February 1, 2020 and February 2, 2019, the Company had unrecognized tax benefits of $1.5 million, $1.9 million and $2.5 million, respectively, associated with international jurisdictions.
For federal purposes, the Company’s tax filings for fiscal years 2017 to 2019 remain open to examination but are not currently being examined. The Company also files tax returns in various international jurisdictions and numerous states for which various tax years are subject to examination and currently involved in audits. While the Company is involved in examinations in certain jurisdictions, it does not expect any significant changes in its liability for uncertain tax positions during the next 12 months.
8. BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company’s reportable segments are Famous Footwear and Brand Portfolio. The Famous Footwear segment is comprised of Famous Footwear, famousfootwear.com and famousfootwear.ca. Famous Footwear operated 916 stores at the end of 2020, primarily selling branded footwear for the entire family.
The Brand Portfolio segment is comprised of wholesale operations selling the Company’s branded footwear, and the retail stores and e-commerce sites associated with those brands. This segment sources and markets licensed, branded and private-label footwear primarily to online retailers, national chains, department stores, mass merchandisers and independent retailers as well as Company-owned Famous Footwear, Allen Edmonds, Naturalizer and Sam Edelman stores and e-commerce businesses. The Brand Portfolio segment included 107 branded retail stores in the United States, 50 branded retail stores in Canada, and 13 branded retail stores in China at the end of 2020.
The Company’s Famous Footwear and Brand Portfolio reportable segments are operating units that are managed separately. These reportable segments reflect the level at which the Company’s chief operating decision maker evaluates financial performance and allocates resources. Operating (loss) earnings for the reportable segments represents gross profit, less selling and administrative expenses, impairment of goodwill and intangible assets and restructuring and other special charges, net. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. Intersegment sales are generally recorded at a profit, and intersegment earnings related to inventory on hand at the purchasing segment are eliminated against the earnings.
Corporate assets, administrative expenses and other costs and recoveries that are not allocated to the operating units, as well as the elimination of intersegment sales and profit, are reported in the Eliminations and Other category.
78
Following is a summary of certain key financial measures for the respective periods:
Famous
Brand
Eliminations
Footwear
Portfolio
and Other
Fiscal 2020
Intersegment sales
48,962
Depreciation and amortization
23,090
28,889
8,560
60,539
(23,821)
(408,444)
(53,393)
Segment assets
765,754
851,027
250,269
7,693
2,607
16,786
870
153
4,251
5,274
Fiscal 2019
72,955
26,706
29,875
8,981
65,562
Operating earnings (loss)
76,896
58,153
(31,236)
891,042
1,383,500
157,165
16,129
21,973
6,431
44,533
1,544
4,059
5,619
Fiscal 2018
85,513
28,816
20,768
13,113
62,697
85,268
(40,799)
(44,068)
502,507
1,211,008
125,053
1,838,568
17,552
41,993
2,938
62,483
351
814
3,251
4,416
Products purchased for the Famous Footwear segment from three key third-party suppliers (Nike, Skechers and adidas) represented approximately 25%, 22% and 24% of consolidated net sales for 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Following is a reconciliation of operating (loss) earnings to (loss) earnings before income taxes:
For geographic purposes, the domestic operations include the Company’s domestic retail operations, the wholesale distribution of licensed, branded and private-label footwear to a variety of retail customers, including the Famous Footwear and Brand Portfolio stores, as well as the Company’s e-commerce businesses.
The Company’s international operations consist of wholesale and retail operations primarily in Eastern Asia, Canada and Europe. The Eastern Asia operations primarily include first-cost transactions, where footwear is sold at international ports to customers who then import the footwear into the United States and other countries.
79
A summary of the Company’s net sales and long-lived assets, including lease right-of-use assets and property and equipment, by geographic area were as follows:
United States
1,984,713
2,734,912
2,656,928
Eastern Asia
77,793
98,045
93,883
Canada
46,781
80,247
63,354
7,783
8,358
20,681
Long-Lived Assets (1)
703,642
881,338
219,975
20,246
35,317
9,381
2,660
3,527
1,348
192
258
Total long-lived assets
726,740
920,440
230,784
9. INVENTORIES
The Company’s net inventory balance was comprised of the following:
Raw materials
14,592
18,455
Work-in-process
349
454
Finished goods
473,014
599,497
Inventories, net
As of January 30, 2021 and February 1, 2020, the Company’s inventory balance included $0.8 million and $2.5 million, respectively, of finished goods product subject to a consignment arrangement with wholesale customers.
10. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment consisted of the following:
Land and buildings
53,561
52,638
Leasehold improvements
208,939
241,209
Technology equipment
49,105
56,480
Machinery and equipment
98,862
98,715
Furniture and fixtures
126,405
140,233
Construction in progress
6,773
4,704
Property and equipment
543,645
593,979
Allowances for depreciation
(371,208)
(369,133)
Useful lives of property and equipment are as follows:
Buildings
5 - 30
5 - 20
2 - 7
4 - 20
3 - 10
The Company recorded charges for impairment of $56.3 million, $5.9 million and $3.7 million in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, primarily for operating lease right-of-use assets, leasehold improvements and furniture and fixtures in the Company’s retail stores. Of the $56.3 million of impairment charges in 2020, $55.3 million is reflected in restructuring and other special charges, and $1.0 million is reflected in selling and administrative expenses. All of the charges in 2019 and 2018 are presented in selling and administrative expenses. Fair value was based on estimated future cash flows to be generated by retail stores, discounted at a market rate of interest. Refer to Note 5, Note 13 and Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of these impairment charges.
Interest costs for major asset additions are capitalized during the construction or development period and amortized over the lives of the related assets. The Company capitalized interest of $0.6 million and $0.2 million in 2019 and 2018, respectively, related to the new company-operated Brand Portfolio warehouse facilities in California, with no corresponding interest capitalized in 2020.
11. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill and intangible assets were as follows:
Intangible Assets
2,800
342,083
Total intangible assets
344,883
391,088
Accumulated amortization
(109,768)
(96,784)
Total intangible assets, net
Total goodwill
Goodwill and intangible assets, net
240,071
539,579
The Company’s intangible assets as of January 30, 2021 and February 1, 2020 were as follows:
Estimated Useful Lives
(In Years)
Cost Basis (1)
Amortization
Impairment
Net Carrying Value
Trade names
2 - 40
299,488
101,919
10,200
187,369
Indefinite
47,400
32,000
15,400
Customer relationships
15 - 16
44,200
7,849
4,005
32,346
109,768
46,205
81
Cost Basis
15 - 40
288,788
91,827
196,961
58,100
(2)
4,957
39,243
96,784
Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $13.0 million in 2020, $13.1 million in 2019 and $7.0 million in 2018. The Company estimates $12.6 million of amortization expense related to intangible assets in 2021, $12.1 million in 2022, $11.9 million in 2023, and $11.0 million in 2024 and 2025.
Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate it might be impaired, using either the qualitative assessment or a quantitative fair value-based test. During the first quarter of 2020, as a result of the significant decline in the Company’s share price and market capitalization and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s business operations, the Company determined that an interim assessment of goodwill was required. A quantitative assessment was performed for all reporting units as of May 2, 2020. The assessment indicated that the carrying value of the goodwill associated with the Brand Portfolio and Vionic reporting units was impaired, resulting in total goodwill impairment charges of $240.3 million. In addition to the interim assessment, the Company performed an impairment review of the remaining goodwill balance, which is associated with the Blowfish Malibu reporting unit, as of the first day of the fourth fiscal quarter. That review indicated no impairment. During 2019 and 2018, the goodwill impairment testing was performed as of the first day of the fourth fiscal quarter, which resulted in no impairment charges in 2019 and $38.0 million of impairment charges in 2018 associated with goodwill of the Allen Edmonds reporting unit.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment as of the first day of the fourth quarter of each fiscal year unless events or circumstances indicate an interim test is required. As a result of the triggering event from the economic impacts of COVID-19, an interim assessment was performed as of May 2, 2020. The indefinite-lived trade name impairment review resulted in total impairment charges of $22.4 million for the thirteen weeks ended May 2, 2020, including $12.2 million associated with the indefinite-lived Allen Edmonds trade name and $10.2 million of impairment associated with the indefinite-lived Via Spiga trade name. The remaining carrying value of the Via Spiga trade name of $0.5 million is being amortized over approximately two years. In addition to the interim assessment, the Company tested the indefinite-lived intangible assets as of the first day of the fourth fiscal quarter. As a result of the impairment indicator for Allen Edmonds, the Company also tested the definite-lived Allen Edmonds customer relationships intangible asset. Those reviews resulted in additional impairment totaling $23.8 million, consisting of $19.8 million associated with the Allen Edmonds trade name and $4.0 million associated with the Allen Edmonds customer relationships intangible asset. The Company did not record any impairment charges during 2019. During 2018, an impairment charge of $60.0 million was recorded for impairment of the Allen Edmonds indefinite-lived trade name. Total intangible asset impairment charges of $46.2 million and $60.0 million in 2020 and 2018, respectively, are reflected within the Brand Portfolio segment.
12. LONG-TERM AND SHORT-TERM FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
The Company maintains a revolving credit facility for working capital needs. The Company is the lead borrower, and Sidney Rich Associates, Inc., BG Retail, LLC, Allen Edmonds LLC, Vionic Group LLC and Vionic International LLC are each co-borrowers and guarantors under the revolving credit facility. On January 18, 2019, the Loan Parties entered into a Third Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement to extend the maturity date to January 18, 2024 and change the borrowing capacity from an aggregate amount of up to $600.0 million to an aggregate amount of up to $500.0 million, with the option to further increase by up to $250.0 million. On April 14, 2020, the Company entered
82
into a Fourth Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (as so amended, the "Credit Agreement") which, among other modifications, increased the amount available under the revolving credit facility by $100.0 million to an aggregate amount of up to $600.0 million, subject to borrowing base restrictions, and may be further increased by up to $150.0 million. The Credit Agreement increased the spread applied to the LIBOR or prime rate by a total of 75 basis points and increased the unused line fee by 5 basis points.
Interest on borrowings is at variable rates based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) (with a floor of 1.0% imposed by the Credit Agreement) or the prime rate, as defined in the Credit Agreement, plus a spread. The interest rate and fees for letters of credit vary based upon the level of excess availability under the Credit Agreement. There is an unused line fee payable on the unused portion under the facility and a letter of credit fee payable on the outstanding face amount under letters of credit.
The Credit Agreement limits the Company’s ability to create, incur, assume or permit to exist additional indebtedness and liens, make investments or specified payments, give guarantees, pay dividends, make capital expenditures and merge or acquire or sell assets. In addition, if excess availability falls below the greater of 10.0% of the lesser of the Loan Cap and $40.0 million for three consecutive business days, and the fixed charge coverage ratio is less than 1.0 to 1.0, the Company would be in default under the Credit Agreement.
The Credit Agreement contains customary events of default, including, without limitation, payment defaults, breaches of representations and warranties, covenant defaults, cross-defaults to similar obligations, certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency, judgment defaults and the failure of any guaranty or security document supporting the agreement to be in full force and effect. If an event of default occurs, the collateral agent may assume dominion and control over the Company’s cash (a “cash dominion event”) until such event of default is cured or waived or the excess availability exceeds such amount for 30 consecutive days, provided that a cash dominion event shall be deemed continuing (even if an event of default is no longer continuing and/or excess availability exceeds the required amount for 30 consecutive business days) after a cash dominion event has occurred and been discontinued on two occasions in any 12-month period. The Credit Agreement also contains certain other covenants and restrictions. The Company was in compliance with all covenants and restrictions under the Credit Agreement as of January 30, 2021.
The maximum amount of borrowings under the Credit Agreement at the end of any month was $438.5 million and $407.5 million in 2020 and 2019, respectively. As discussed further in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company utilized the Credit Agreement in October 2018 to fund the Vionic acquisition. In addition, in March 2020, the Company increased the borrowings on the revolving credit facility to $440.0 million as a precautionary measure to increase its cash position and preserve financial flexibility given the uncertainty resulting from COVID-19. The Company made debt reduction a priority during the second half of 2020, reducing the borrowings outstanding to $250.0 million as of January 30, 2021. In addition to the $250.0 million of borrowings outstanding, the Company had $11.2 million in letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Agreement, with total additional borrowing availability of $136.0 million at January 30, 2021. Average daily borrowings during the year were $299.8 million and $352.4 million in 2020 and 2019, respectively, and the weighted-average interest rates approximated 3.4% and 4.1% for the respective periods.
On July 27, 2015, the Company issued $200.0 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes due on August 15, 2023 (the "Senior Notes"). The Senior Notes bear interest at 6.25%, which is payable on February 15 and August 15 of each year. The Senior Notes are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by each of the Company’s subsidiaries that is a borrower or guarantor under the Credit Agreement.
If the Company experiences specific kinds of changes of control, it would be required to offer to purchase the Senior Notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest and Additional Interest (as defined in the Senior Notes indenture), if any, to, but not including, the date of repurchase. The Senior Notes also
83
contain certain other covenants and restrictions that limit certain activities including, among other things, levels of indebtedness, payments of dividends, the guarantee or pledge of assets, certain investments, common stock repurchases, mergers and acquisitions and sales of assets. As of January 30, 2021, the Company was in compliance with all covenants and restrictions relating to the Senior Notes.
13. LEASES
The Company leases all of its retail locations, a manufacturing facility, and certain office locations, distribution centers and equipment. At contract inception, leases are evaluated and classified as either operating or finance leases. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet.
During the first quarter of 2019, the Company adopted ASC Topic 842, Leases (“ASC 842”), using the modified retrospective transition method. Prior period financial information in the consolidated financial statements has not been adjusted and is presented in compliance with ASC 840. The Company elected the package of practical expedients and the expedient to account for lease and non-lease components as a single component for the entire population of operating lease assets. The Company did not elect the hindsight practical expedient to reevaluate the lease term of existing contracts.
Lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term. The majority of the Company’s leases do not provide an implicit rate and therefore, the Company uses an incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the commencement date to determine the present value of future payments. Lease expense for the minimum lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Variable lease payments are expensed as incurred.
The Company regularly analyzes the results of all of its stores and assesses the viability of underperforming stores to determine whether events or circumstances exist that indicate the stores should be closed or whether the carrying amount of their long-lived assets may not be recoverable. After allowing for an appropriate start-up period, unusual nonrecurring events or favorable trends, property and equipment at stores and the lease right-of-use assets indicated as impaired are written down to fair value as calculated using a discounted cash flow method. The fair value of the lease right-of-use assets is determined utilizing projected cash flows for each store location, discounted using a risk-adjusted discount rate, subject to a market floor based on current market lease rates. The Company recorded asset impairment charges, primarily related to underperforming retail stores, of $56.3 million, $5.9 million and $3.7 million during 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The impairment charges recorded in 2020, including $31.4 million associated with operating lease right-of-use assets and $24.9 million associated with property and equipment, primarily reflect the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s retail operations and estimates of remaining cash flows for each store, as well as the decision to close all but a few of the Company’s Naturalizer retail stores. Refer to Note 5 and Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion on these impairment charges.
As a result of the temporary store closures during the first half of 2020 associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company negotiated with landlords to modify payment terms for certain leases. Deferred payments for these leases are reflected in lease obligations on the consolidated balance sheets. As further discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, under relief provided by the FASB, entities may make a policy election to account for the lease concessions related to COVID-19 as if the enforceable rights existed under the original contract, accounting for them as variable rent rather than lease modifications. The Company has made a policy election to account for lease concessions related to COVID-19 as variable rent. Accordingly, in 2020 the Company recorded $5.4 million in lease concessions as a reduction of rent expense within selling and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of earnings (loss). Rent deferrals for leases that were extended in connection with the rent concession will continue to be recognized consistent with the original lease agreement.
The weighted-average lease term and discount rate as of January 30, 2021 and February 1, 2020 were as follows:
Weighted-average remaining lease term (in years)
6.8
Weighted-average discount rate
4.2
4.3
84
During 2020, the Company entered into new or amended leases that resulted in the recognition of right-of-use assets and lease obligations of $88.5 million on the consolidated balance sheets. As of January 30, 2021, the Company has entered into lease commitments for six retail locations for which the leases have not yet commenced. The Company anticipates that the leases for five of the new retail locations will begin in the next fiscal year and one will begin in fiscal year 2022. Upon commencement, right-of-use assets and lease liabilities of approximately $4.5 million and $0.5 million will be recorded on the consolidated balance sheets, in 2021 and 2022, respectively.
The components of lease expense for 2020 and 2019 were as follows:
Operating lease expense
167,624
186,185
Variable lease expense
48,443
45,455
Short-term lease expense
4,512
3,339
Sublease income
(96)
(269)
Total lease expense (1)
220,483
234,710
The aggregate future annual lease obligations at January 30, 2021 were as follows:
176,902
137,151
108,201
86,114
66,566
Thereafter
201,925
Total minimum operating lease payments
776,859
Less imputed interest
(104,857)
Present value of lease obligations
672,002
Supplemental cash flow information related to leases is as follows:
Cash paid for lease liabilities
145,552
196,033
Cash received from sublease income
96
As previously reported in accordance with the guidance in ASC 840, a summary of rent expense for operating leases for 2018 is as follows:
Minimum rent
171,410
Contingent rent
671
(428)
171,653
14. RISK MANAGEMENT AND DERIVATIVES
General Risk Management
The Company maintains cash and cash equivalents and certain other financial instruments with various financial institutions. The financial institutions are located throughout the world and the Company’s policy is designed to limit exposure to any one institution or geographic region. The Company’s periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of these financial institutions are considered in the Company’s investment strategy.
85
The Company’s Brand Portfolio segment sells to online retailers, national chains, department stores, mass merchandisers and independent retailers in the United States, Canada and approximately 66 other countries. Receivables arising from these sales are not collateralized. However, a portion is covered by documentary letters of credit. Credit risk is affected by conditions or occurrences within the economy and the retail industry. The Company maintains an allowance for expected credit losses based upon factors surrounding the credit risk of specific customers and historical trends.
Derivatives
In the normal course of business, the Company’s financial results are impacted by currency rate movements in foreign-currency-denominated assets, liabilities and cash flows as it makes a portion of its purchases and sales in local currencies. The Company has established policies and business practices that are intended to mitigate a portion of the effect of these exposures. The Company’s hedging strategy permits the use of forward contracts as cash flow hedging instruments to manage its currency exposures. These derivative financial instruments are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes. Derivatives entered into by the Company are designated as cash flow hedges of forecasted foreign currency transactions.
Derivative financial instruments expose the Company to credit and market risk. The market risk associated with these instruments resulting from currency exchange movements is expected to offset the market risk of the underlying transactions being hedged. The Company does not believe there is a significant risk of loss in the event of non-performance by the counterparties associated with these instruments because these transactions are executed with major international financial institutions. Credit risk is managed through the continuous monitoring of exposures to such counterparties.
The Company principally uses foreign currency forward contracts as cash flow hedges to offset a portion of the effects of exchange rate fluctuations. The Company’s cash flow exposures include anticipated foreign currency transactions, such as foreign currency denominated sales, costs, expenses and intercompany charges, as well as collections and payments.
The cash flow hedging instruments are recorded in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The effective portion of gains and losses resulting from changes in the fair value of these hedge instruments are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss ("OCL") and reclassified to earnings in the period that the hedged transaction is recognized in earnings.
The Company had no forward contracts as of January 30, 2021. As of February 1, 2020, the Company had forward contracts maturing at various dates through May 2020. The contract amounts in the following table represent the net notional amount of all purchase and sale contracts of a foreign currency.
(U.S. $equivalent in thousands)
Financial Instruments
U.S. dollars (purchased by the Company’s Canadian division with Canadian dollars)
3,963
Euro
1,251
Chinese yuan
2,355
Other currencies
Total financial instruments
7,638
The classification and fair values of derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments included within the consolidated balance sheets as of January 30, 2021 and February 1, 2020 are as follows:
Asset Derivatives
Liability Derivatives
Balance Sheet Location
Fair Value
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts
103
During 2020 and 2019, the effect of derivative instruments in cash flow hedging relationships on the consolidated statements of earnings (loss) was as follows:
Loss
Gain (Loss)
Reclassified
Gain
from
Foreign exchange forward contracts:
Recognized in
Income Statement Classification
OCI on
OCL into
OCL on
Gains (Losses)- Realized
439
(38)
(6)
(68)
(227)
Additional information related to the Company’s derivative financial instruments are disclosed within Note 1 and Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements.
15. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair Value Hierarchy
Fair value measurement disclosure requirements specify a hierarchy of valuation techniques based upon whether the inputs to those valuation techniques reflect assumptions other market participants would use based upon market data obtained from independent sources (“observable inputs”) or reflect the Company’s own assumptions of market participant valuation (“unobservable inputs”). In accordance with the fair value guidance, the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value are categorized into three levels based on the reliability of the inputs as follows:
In determining fair value, the Company uses valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible. The Company also considers counterparty credit risk in its assessment of fair value. Classification of the financial or non-financial asset or liability within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
87
Measurement of Fair Value
The Company measures fair value as an exit price, the price to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, using the procedures described below for all financial and non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value.
Money Market Funds
The Company has cash equivalents primarily consisting of short-term money market funds backed by U.S. Treasury securities. The primary objective of these investing activities is to preserve the Company’s capital for the purpose of funding operations and it does not enter into money market funds for trading or speculative purposes. The fair value is based on unadjusted quoted market prices for the funds in active markets with sufficient volume and frequency (Level 1).
Deferred Compensation Plan Assets and Liabilities
The Company maintains a non-qualified deferred compensation plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”) for the benefit of certain management employees. The investment funds offered to the participants generally correspond to the funds offered in the Company’s 401(k) plan, and the account balance fluctuates with the investment returns on those funds. The Deferred Compensation Plan permits the deferral of up to 50% of base salary and 100% of compensation received under the Company’s annual incentive plan. The deferrals are held in a separate trust, which has been established by the Company to administer the Deferred Compensation Plan. The assets of the trust are subject to the claims of the Company’s creditors in the event that the Company becomes insolvent. Consequently, the trust qualifies as a grantor trust for income tax purposes (i.e., a “Rabbi Trust”). The liabilities of the Deferred Compensation Plan are presented in other accrued expenses and the assets held by the trust are classified within prepaid expenses and other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Changes in deferred compensation plan assets and liabilities are charged to selling and administrative expenses. The fair value is based on unadjusted quoted market prices for the funds in active markets with sufficient volume and frequency (Level 1).
Non-employee directors are eligible to participate in a deferred compensation plan with deferred amounts valued as if invested in the Company’s common stock through the use of phantom stock units (“PSUs”). Under the plan, each participating director’s account is credited with the number of PSUs equal to the number of shares of the Company’s common stock that the participant could purchase or receive with the amount of the deferred compensation, based upon the average of the high and low prices of the Company’s common stock on the last trading day of the fiscal quarter when the cash compensation was earned. Dividend equivalents are paid on PSUs at the same rate as dividends on the Company’s common stock and are re-invested in additional PSUs at the next fiscal quarter-end. The liabilities of the plan are based on the fair value of the outstanding PSUs and are presented in other accrued expenses (current portion) or other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Gains and losses resulting from changes in the fair value of the PSUs are presented in selling and administrative expenses in the Company’s consolidated statements of earnings (loss). The fair value of each PSU is based on an unadjusted quoted market price for the Company’s common stock in an active market with sufficient volume and frequency on each measurement date (Level 1).
Restricted Stock Units for Non-Employee Directors
Under the Company’s incentive compensation plans, cash-equivalent restricted stock units (“RSUs”) of the Company were previously granted at no cost to non-employee directors. These cash-equivalent RSUs are subject to a vesting requirement (usually one year), earn dividend-equivalent units and are settled in cash on the date the director terminates service or such earlier date as a director may elect, subject to restrictions, based on the then current fair value of the Company’s common stock. The fair value of each cash-equivalent RSU payable is based on an unadjusted quoted market price for the Company’s common stock in an active market with sufficient volume and frequency on each measurement date (Level 1). Additional information related to RSUs for non-employee directors is disclosed in Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements.
The Company may use derivative financial instruments, primarily foreign exchange contracts, to reduce its exposure to market risks from changes in foreign exchange rates. These foreign exchange contracts are measured at fair value using quoted forward foreign exchange prices from counterparties corroborated by market-based pricing (Level 2). Additional
88
information related to the Company’s derivative financial instruments is disclosed in Note 1 and Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements.
Mandatory Purchase Obligation
The Company recorded a mandatory purchase obligation of the noncontrolling interest in conjunction with the acquisition of Blowfish Malibu in July 2018 as further discussed in Note 2 in the consolidated financials. The fair value of the mandatory purchase obligation is based on the earnings formula specified in the Purchase Agreement (Level 3). The mandatory purchase obligation and any fair value adjustments are recorded as interest expense. The Company recorded fair value adjustments of $23.9 million during 2020 and $6.0 million during 2019. From the acquisition date of July 6, 2018 through February 2, 2019, an immaterial amount of accretion was recorded on the mandatory purchase obligation. The earnings projections and discount rate utilized in the initial estimate of the fair value of the mandatory purchase obligation required management judgment and are the assumptions to which the fair value calculation was the most sensitive.
The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at January 30, 2021 and February 1, 2020. The Company did not have any transfers between Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 during 2020, 2019 or 2018.
Fair Value Measurements
Asset (Liability)
January 30, 2021:
Cash equivalents – money market funds
45,000
Non-qualified deferred compensation plan assets
7,918
Non-qualified deferred compensation plan liabilities
(7,918)
Deferred compensation plan liabilities for non-employee directors
(989)
Restricted stock units for non-employee directors
(1,661)
(39,134)
February 1, 2020:
18,001
8,004
(8,004)
(1,536)
(2,572)
Derivative financial instruments, net
(103)
(15,200)
Impairment Charges
The Company assesses the impairment of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors the Company considers important that could trigger an impairment review include underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results, a significant change in the manner of the use of the asset or a negative industry or economic trend. When the Company determines that the carrying value of long-lived assets may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the aforementioned factors, impairment is measured based on a projected discounted cash flow method. Certain factors, such as estimated store sales and expenses, used for this nonrecurring fair value measurement are considered Level 3 inputs as defined by FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement. Long-lived assets held and used with a carrying amount of $615.7 million, $780.2 million and $99.0 million in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, were assessed for indicators of impairment and written down to their fair value. This assessment resulted in the impairment charges presented in the table below, primarily for operating lease right-of-use assets, leasehold improvements, and furniture and fixtures in the Company’s retail stores. Higher impairment charges were recorded in 2020, reflecting adverse economic conditions, driven in part by the COVID-19 pandemic. Adoption of ASC 842 in 2019 has resulted in higher impairment charges for underperforming retail stores as a direct result of including the right-of-use asset in the asset group that is evaluated for impairment.
89
Long-Lived Asset Impairment Charges
14,900
1,980
800
41,443
3,887
2,865
Total long-lived asset impairment charges
The Company performed its annual impairment review of indefinite-lived intangible assets, which involves estimating the fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). As a result of its annual impairment testing, the Company recorded $46.2 million in impairment charges in 2020. The Company did not record any impairment charges in 2019. The Company recorded $60.0 million in impairment charges in 2018 related to the Allen Edmonds trade name, as further discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements.
During 2020, the Company performed an interim impairment test of goodwill, as further discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements. A quantitative assessment was performed for all reporting units as of May 2, 2020, which involved estimating the fair value of the reporting units using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). The assessment indicated that the carrying value of the goodwill associated with the Brand Portfolio and Vionic reporting units was impaired, resulting in total goodwill impairment charges of $240.3 million. In addition to the interim assessment, the Company performed an impairment review of the remaining goodwill balance, which is associated with the Blowfish Malibu reporting unit, as of the first day of the fourth fiscal quarter. The review indicated no impairment. The quantitative assessments performed in 2019 resulted no impairment charges. The quantitative and qualitative assessments performed in 2018 resulted in impairment charges of $38.0 million. Refer to Note 1 and Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to the goodwill impairment tests.
Fair Value of the Company’s Other Financial Instruments
The fair values of cash and cash equivalents (excluding money market funds discussed above), receivables and trade accounts payable approximate their carrying values due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
The carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s other financial instruments subject to fair value disclosures are as follows:
Carrying
Value (1)
200,000
201,000
205,000
Total debt
450,000
451,000
475,000
480,000
The fair value of the borrowings under revolving credit agreement approximates its carrying value due to its short-term nature (Level 1). The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt was based upon quoted prices in an inactive market as of the end of the respective periods (Level 2).
16. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Stock Repurchase Programs
On August 25, 2011, December 14, 2018 and September 2, 2019, the Board of Directors approved stock repurchase programs (“2011 Program”, "2018 Program" and "2019 Program", respectively) authorizing the repurchase of the Company’s outstanding common stock of up to 2.5 million shares in both the 2011 Program and 2018 Program and 5.0 million shares in the 2019 Program. The Company can use the repurchase programs to repurchase shares on the open market or in private transactions from time to time, depending on market conditions. The repurchase programs do not have an expiration date. Repurchases of common stock are limited under the Company’s debt agreements. In total, 2.5 million shares have been repurchased under the 2011 Program and there are no additional shares authorized to be
repurchased. During 2020, the Company repurchased the remaining 553,611 shares under the 2018 Program and 2,348,511 shares under the 2019 Program. There are 2,651,489 shares additional shares authorized to be repurchased under the 2019 Program as of January 30, 2021.
Repurchases Related to Employee Share-based Awards
During 2020, 2019 and 2018, employees tendered 160,101, 100,728 and 145,357 shares, respectively, related to certain share-based awards. These shares were tendered in satisfaction of the exercise price of stock options and/or to satisfy tax withholding amounts for non-qualified stock options, restricted stock and stock performance awards. Accordingly, these share repurchases are not considered a part of the Company’s publicly announced stock repurchase programs.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The following table sets forth the changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, by component for 2020, 2019 and 2018:
Pension and
Foreign
Currency
Derivative
Translation
Transactions (1)
Transactions (2)
(Loss) Income
Balance January 28, 2018
1,235
(17,172)
767
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications
(15,927)
(1,497)
(18,597)
Reclassifications:
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss
2,754
154
2,908
Tax benefit
(710)
(32)
(742)
Net reclassifications
2,044
122
2,166
Other comprehensive loss
Balance February 3, 2019
(31,055)
(608)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications
(3,523)
315
(3,850)
4,590
256
4,846
(1,183)
(1,238)
3,407
201
3,608
Other comprehensive (loss) income
Balance February 1, 2020
(580)
(31,171)
(92)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
20,351
20,907
2,418
2,424
(623)
(1)
(624)
1,795
1,800
Other comprehensive income
Balance January 30, 2021
(111)
(9,025)
91
17. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company has share-based incentive compensation plans under which certain officers, employees and members of the Board of Directors are participants and may be granted restricted stock, stock performance awards, restricted stock units and stock options.
ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation, and ASC 505, Equity, require companies to recognize compensation expense in an amount equal to the fair value of all share-based payments granted to employees over the requisite service period for each award. In certain limited circumstances, the Company’s incentive compensation plan provides for accelerated vesting of the awards, such as in the event of a change in control, qualified retirement, death or disability. The Company has a policy of issuing treasury shares in satisfaction of share-based awards.
Share-based compensation expense of $8.1 million, $10.2 million and $13.8 million was recognized in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, as a component of selling and administrative expenses. The following table details the share-based compensation expense by plan for 2020, 2019 and 2018:
Expense for share-based compensation plans, net of forfeitures:
Restricted stock
6,840
9,597
10,925
Stock performance awards
147
(502)
1,741
Restricted stock units
1,109
1,129
1,091
Stock options
1
Total share-based compensation expense
The Company issued 471,569, 214,435 and 350,522 shares of common stock in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, for restricted stock grants, stock performance awards issued to employees, stock options exercised and common and restricted stock grants issued to non-employee directors, net of forfeitures and shares withheld to satisfy the tax withholding requirement.
The Company recognized an excess tax provision of $1.1 million and $0.1 million in 2020 and 2019, respectively, related to restricted stock vestings and dividends, performance share award vestings and stock options exercised. Excess tax benefits of $0.3 million were recognized in 2018. The excess tax provision or benefit for the respective periods were recorded in income tax benefit (provision).
Restricted Stock
Under the Company’s incentive compensation plans, restricted stock of the Company may be granted at no cost to certain officers, key employees and directors. Plan participants are entitled to cash dividends and voting rights for their respective shares. The restricted stock awards limit the sale or transfer of these shares during the requisite service period. Expense for restricted stock grants is recognized on a straight-line basis separately for each vesting portion of the stock award based upon fair value of the award on the date of grant. The fair value of the restricted stock grants is the quoted market price for the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.
The following table summarizes restricted stock activity for 2020, 2019 and 2018:
Number of
Nonvested
Weighted-
Restricted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
Nonvested at February 3, 2018
1,174,801
27.92
Granted
427,083
31.88
Vested
(291,061)
28.18
Forfeited
(61,600)
28.77
Nonvested at February 2, 2019
1,249,223
29.17
463,234
22.93
(222,562)
30.26
(218,100)
28.83
Nonvested at February 1, 2020
1,271,795
26.77
707,931
6.99
(430,837)
28.27
(151,662)
22.19
Nonvested at January 30, 2021
1,397,227
16.74
Of the 707,931 restricted shares granted during 2020, 12,748 shares have a cliff-vesting term of one year and 695,183 shares have a graded-vesting term of three years, with 50% vesting after two years and 50% after three years. Of the 463,234 restricted shares granted during 2019, 12,914 shares had a cliff-vesting term of one year and 450,320 shares have a graded-vesting term of three years, with 50% vesting after two years and 50% after three years. Of the 427,083 restricted shares granted during 2018, 3,642 shares had a cliff-vesting term of one year, 413,941 shares have a graded-vesting term of three years, with 50% vesting after two years and 50% after three years, and 9,500 shares have a cliff-vesting term of four years.
The total grant date fair value of restricted stock awards vested during the years ended January 30, 2021, February 1, 2020 and February 2, 2019, was $4.4 million, $6.7 million and $8.2 million, respectively. As of January 30, 2021, the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock grants was $5.9 million, which will be amortized over the weighted-average remaining requisite service period of 1.5 years.
Performance Share Awards
Under the Company’s incentive compensation plans, common stock or cash may be awarded at the end of the performance period at no cost to certain officers and key employees if certain financial goals are met. Under the plan, employees are granted performance share awards at a target number of shares or units, which generally vest over a three-year service period. Vesting of the performance share award granted in 2020 is dependent upon the attainment of certain financial goals during the second half of 2020. At the end of the vesting period, the employee will have earned an amount of shares between 0% and 200% of the targeted award, depending on the attainment of certain financial goals during the service period. If the awards are granted in units, the employee will be given an amount of cash ranging from 0% to 200% of the equivalent market value of the targeted award. Expense for performance share awards is recognized based upon the fair value of the awards on the date of grant and the anticipated number of shares or cash to be awarded on a straight-line basis for each vesting portion of the share award.
The following table summarizes performance share award activity for 2020, 2019 and 2018:
Number of Nonvested
Performance Share
Awards at Target
Awards at Maximum
Weighted-Average
Level
Grant Date Fair Value
399,627
799,254
27.45
155,000
310,000
31.84
(80,627)
(161,254)
30.12
(16,167)
(32,334)
26.83
457,833
915,666
28.49
180,000
23.42
(149,833)
(299,666)
26.64
(12,000)
(24,000)
28.33
476,000
952,000
27.16
87,750
175,500
7.47
(153,000)
(306,000)
26.90
(50,000)
18.64
385,750
771,500
23.33
As of January 30, 2021, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested performance share awards was $1.0 million, which will be recognized over the remaining service period of two years.
Stock Options
Stock options are granted to employees at exercise prices equal to the quoted market price of the Company’s stock at the date of grant. Stock options generally vest over four years and have a term of 10 years. Compensation cost for all stock options is recognized over the requisite service period for each award. No dividends are paid on unexercised options. Expense for stock options is recognized on a straight-line basis separately for each vesting portion of the stock option award. The Company granted no stock options during 2020, 2019 and 2018.
The following table summarizes stock option activity for 2020:
Average
Options
Exercise Price
Outstanding at February 1, 2020
35,667
19.70
(9,000)
9.89
Canceled or expired
(2,000)
13.99
Outstanding at January 30, 2021
24,667
23.74
Exercisable at January 30, 2021
As of January 30, 2021, there are no nonvested options.
Equity-based grants may be made to non-employee directors in the form of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) payable in cash or common stock at no cost to the non-employee director. The RSUs are subject to a vesting requirement (usually one year), earn dividend equivalent units and are payable in cash or common stock on the date the director terminates service or such earlier date as a director may elect, subject to restrictions, based on the then current fair value of the Company’s common stock. Dividend equivalents are paid on outstanding RSUs at the same rate as dividends on the Company’s common stock, are automatically re-invested in additional RSUs and vest immediately as of the payment date for the dividend. Expense related to the initial grant of RSUs is recognized ratably over the vesting period based upon the fair value of the RSUs. The RSUs payable in cash are remeasured at the end of each period. Expense for the dividend equivalents is recognized at fair value immediately. Gains and losses resulting from changes in the fair value of the RSUs
94
payable in cash subsequent to the vesting period and through the settlement date are recognized in the Company’s consolidated statements of earnings (loss). Refer to Note 6 and Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements for information regarding the deferred compensation plan for non-employee directors.
The following table summarizes restricted stock unit activity for the year ended January 30, 2021:
Outstanding
Accrued (3)
RSUs
Grant Date
RSUs (2)
415,157
76,827
491,984
466,375
17.66
Granted (1)
14,983
105,421
120,404
86,408
10.50
74,464
(74,464)
23,676
18.83
Settled
(88,370)
9.52
416,234
107,784
524,018
488,089
9.85
The following table summarizes RSUs granted, vested and settled during 2020, 2019 and 2018:
($ thousands, except per unit amounts)
Weighted-average grant date fair value of RSUs granted (1)
10.12
19.59
34.23
Fair value of RSUs vested
1,125
589
1,340
RSUs settled
88,370
4,574
5,914
The following table details the RSU compensation expense and the related income tax provision (benefit) for 2020, 2019 and 2018:
Compensation (income) expense
(613)
(1,756)
287
Income tax provision (benefit)
158
452
(74)
Compensation (income) expense, net of tax
(455)
(1,304)
213
The aggregate fair value of RSUs outstanding and currently vested at January 30, 2021 is $7.9 million and $6.3 million, respectively. The liabilities associated with the accrued RSUs totaled $1.7 million and $2.6 million as of January 30, 2021 and February 1, 2020, respectively.
18. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Environmental Remediation
Prior operations included numerous manufacturing and other facilities for which the Company may have responsibility under various environmental laws for the remediation of conditions that may be identified in the future. The Company is involved in environmental remediation and ongoing compliance activities at several sites and has been notified that it is or may be a potentially responsible party at several other sites.
95
Redfield
The Company is remediating, under the oversight of Colorado authorities, the groundwater and indoor air at its owned facility in Colorado (the “Redfield site” or, when referring to remediation activities at or under the facility, the “on-site remediation”) and residential neighborhoods adjacent to and near the property (the “off-site remediation”) that have been affected by solvents previously used at the facility. The on-site remediation calls for the operation of a pump and treat system (which prevents migration of contaminated groundwater off the property) as the final remedy for the site, subject to monitoring and periodic review of the on-site conditions and other remedial technologies that may be developed in the future. In 2016, the Company submitted a revised plan to address on-site conditions, including direct treatment of source areas, and received approval from the oversight authorities to begin implementing the revised plan.
As the treatment of the on-site source areas progresses, the Company expects to convert the pump and treat system to a passive treatment barrier system. Off-site groundwater concentrations have been reducing over time since installation of the pump and treat system in 2000 and injection of clean water beginning in 2003. However, localized areas of contaminated bedrock just beyond the property line continue to impact off-site groundwater. The modified workplan for addressing this condition includes converting the off-site bioremediation system into a monitoring well network and employing different remediation methods in these recalcitrant areas. In accordance with the workplan, a pilot test was conducted of certain groundwater remediation methods and the results of that test were used to develop more detailed plans for remedial activities in the off-site areas, which were approved by the authorities and are being implemented in a phased manner. The results of groundwater monitoring are being used to evaluate the effectiveness of these activities. The Company continues to implement the expanded remedy workplan that was approved by the oversight authorities in 2015. Based on the progress of the direct remedial action of on-site conditions, the Company has submitted a request to the oversight authorities for permission to convert the perimeter pump and treat active remediation system to a passive one. During 2019, a final response was received from the oversight authorities, which is allowing the Company to move forward with implementation of the revised plan.
The cumulative expenditures for both on-site and off-site remediation through January 30, 2021 were $31.8 million. The Company has recovered a portion of these expenditures from insurers and other third parties. The reserve for the anticipated future remediation activities at January 30, 2021 is $9.8 million, of which $8.8 million is recorded within other liabilities and $1.0 million is recorded within other accrued expenses. Of the total $9.8 million reserve, $5.0 million is for off-site remediation and $4.8 million is for on-site remediation. The liability for the on-site remediation was discounted at 4.8%. On an undiscounted basis, the on-site remediation liability would be $13.5 million as of January 30, 2021. The Company expects to spend approximately $0.4 million in the next year, $0.1 million in each of the following four years and $12.7 million in the aggregate thereafter related to the on-site remediation.
Various federal and state authorities have identified the Company as a potentially responsible party for remediation at certain other sites. However, the Company does not currently believe that its liability for such sites, if any, would be material.
The Company continues to evaluate its estimated costs in conjunction with its environmental consultants and records its best estimate of such liabilities. However, future actions and the associated costs are subject to oversight and approval of various governmental authorities. Accordingly, the ultimate costs may vary, and it is possible costs may exceed the recorded amounts.
Litigation
The Company is involved in legal proceedings and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the outcome of such ordinary course of business proceedings and litigation currently pending is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position. Legal costs associated with litigation are generally expensed as incurred.
SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Col. A
Col. B
Col. C
Col. D
Col. E
Additions
Balance at
Charged to
Charged to Other
Beginning of
Costs and
Accounts -
Deductions -
End of
Description
Expenses
Describe
YEAR ENDED JANUARY 30, 2021
Deducted from assets or accounts:
Doubtful accounts and allowances
(E)
(A)
Customer allowances
25,816
20,355
31,020
(B)
15,151
Customer discounts
1,198
11,692
10,998
1,892
Inventory valuation allowances
20,610
63,543
51,525
(C)
32,628
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance
4,809
45,434
262
(D)
49,981
YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 1, 2020
3,050
2,010
24,750
62,737
61,671
12,046
14,401
45,489
39,280
4,199
873
263
YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 2, 2019
2,045
876
(F)
389
24,302
54,161
713
54,426
751
5,545
268
5,366
14,254
40,670
277
40,800
5,763
1,564
ITEM 9CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9ACONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
It is the Chief Executive Officer’s and Chief Financial Officer’s ultimate responsibility to ensure we maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our disclosure controls and procedures include mandatory communication of material events; automated accounting processing and reporting; management review of monthly, quarterly and annual results; an established system of internal controls; and internal control reviews by our internal auditors.
A control system, no matter how well-conceived or operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Furthermore, the design of a control system must reflect the fact there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to errors or fraud may occur and not be detected. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide a reasonable level of assurance that their objectives are achieved. As of January 30, 2021, management of the Company, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon and as of the date of that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
Based on the evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that there have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting or in other factors during the quarter ended January 30, 2021, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9BOTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 10DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Information regarding Directors of the Company is set forth under the caption Proposal 1 – Election of Directors in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 27, 2021, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Information regarding Executive Officers of the Registrant is set forth under the caption Information about our Executive Officers that can be found in Item 1 of this report, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Information regarding Section 16, Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance, is set forth under the caption Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 27, 2021, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Information regarding the Audit Committee and the Audit Committee financial expert is set forth under the caption Board Meetings and Committees in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 27, 2021, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Information regarding the Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct, and Code of Ethics is set forth under the caption Corporate Governance in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 27, 2021, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 11EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information regarding Executive Compensation is set forth under the captions Compensation Discussion and Analysis, Executive Compensation, and Compensation of Non-Employee Directors in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 27, 2021, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Information regarding the Compensation Committee Report is set forth under the caption Compensation Committee Report in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 27, 2021, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Information regarding Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation is set forth under the caption Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 27, 2021, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Information regarding Company Stock Ownership by Directors, Officers and Principal Holders of Our Stock is set forth under the caption Stock Ownership by Directors, Executive Officers and 5% Shareholders in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 27, 2021, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth aggregate information regarding the Company’s equity compensation plans as of January 30, 2021:
securities
remaining
available for
future
issuance
securities to be
under equity
issued upon
average
compensation
exercise of
exercise price
plans
outstanding
of outstanding
(excluding
options,
warrants and
reflected in
rights
column (a))
Plan Category
(a)
(b)
(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
796,167
(1)
3,054,561
(2)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
Information regarding share-based plans is set forth in Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements and is hereby incorporated by reference.
ITEM 13CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Information regarding Certain Relationships and Related Transactions is set forth under the caption Related Party Transactions in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 27, 2021, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Information regarding Director Independence is set forth under the caption Director Independence in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 27, 2021, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Information regarding our Principal Accounting Fees and Services is set forth under the caption Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accountants in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 27, 2021, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 15EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(1) and (2) The list of financial statements and Financial Statement Schedules required by this item is included in the Index under Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. All other schedules specified under Regulation S-X have been omitted because they are not applicable, because they are not required or because the information required is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.
(3) Exhibits
Certain instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt securities of the Company are omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, and the Company hereby undertakes to furnish to the SEC, upon request, copies of any such instruments.
Exhibit No.
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated December 13, 2016, by and among Caleres, Inc., Apollo Investors, LLC, and Apollo Buyer Holding Company, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 14, 2016.
2.2
Equity and Asset Purchase Agreement, dated October 18, 2018, by and among Caleres, Inc., the Equity Sellers (as defined therein), VCG Holdings Ltd., Christopher T. Gallagher and Daniel M. Sanner, solely in their capacity as Sellers’ Representative (as defined therein), and Christopher T. Gallagher and C. Bruce Campbell, solely with respect to specified provisions, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 19, 2018.
3.1
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Caleres, Inc. (the “Company”) incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed June 1, 2020.
Bylaws of the Company as amended through May 28, 2020, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed June 1, 2020.
Description of the Registrant's Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended February 1, 2020, and filed March 31, 2020.
Indenture for the 6.250% Senior Notes due 2023, dated July 27, 2015 among the Company, the subsidiary guarantors set forth therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, as incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated and filed July 27, 2015.
Form of 6.250% Senior Notes due 2023 (included in Exhibit 4.1).
10.1
First Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2015 (the “Credit Agreement”), among the Company, as lead borrower for itself and on behalf of certain of its subsidiaries, and Bank of America, N.A., as lead issuing bank, administrative agent and collateral agent, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as an issuing bank, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as syndication agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and SunTrust Bank, as co-documentation agents, and the other financial institutions party thereto, as lenders, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated and filed July 20, 2015.
10.1a
Second Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated August 17, 2016, among the Company, as lead borrower for itself and on behalf of certain of its subsidiaries, and the financial institutions party thereto, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 30, 2016.
10.1b
Third Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated January 18, 2019, among the Company, as lead borrower for itself and on behalf of certain of its subsidiaries, and the financial institutions party thereto, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated and filed January 23, 2019.
10.1c
Fourth Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated April 14, 2020, among the Company, as lead borrower for itself and on behalf of certain of its subsidiaries, and the financial institutions party thereto, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s 8-K dated and filed April 20, 2020.
10.2a*
Caleres, Inc. Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2002, as Amended and Restated as of May 22, 2008, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit A to the Company’s definitive proxy statement dated and filed April 11, 2008.
10.2b(1)*
Form of Incentive Stock Option Award Agreement (for grants commencing May 2008) under the Company's Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2002, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5b(1) to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2009, and filed March 31, 2009.
10.2b(2)*
Form of Incentive Stock Option Award Agreement (for grants prior to May 2008) under the Company's Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2002, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2004, and filed September 8, 2004.
10.2c(1)*
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement (for grants commencing May 2008) under the Company’s Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2002, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5c(1) to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2009, and filed March 31, 2009.
10.2c(2)*
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement (for grants prior to May 2008) under the Company’s Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2002, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2004, and filed September 8, 2004.
10.3a*
Caleres, Inc. Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2011, as amended and restated effective May 28, 2015, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 2, 2015, and filed June 10, 2015.
10.3b*
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (for employee grants commencing December 2016 and March 2017) under the Company’s Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2011, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2(g) to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended January 28, 2017, and filed March 28, 2017.
10.4a*
Caleres, Inc. Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2017, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit A to the Company’s definitive proxy statement dated and filed April 14, 2017.
10.4b*
Form of Performance Award Agreement (for 2018-2020 performance period) under the Company’s Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2017, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4b to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended February 3, 2018, and filed April 4, 2018.
10.4c*
Form of Performance Award Agreement (for 2019-2021 performance period) under the Company’s Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2017, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4c to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended February 2, 2019, and filed April 2, 2019.
10.4d*
Form of Performance Award Agreement (for 2020-2022 performance period) under the Company’s Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2017, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4a to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2020, and filed December 9, 2020.
†10.4e*
Form of Performance Award Agreement (for 2021-2023 performance period) under the Company’s Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2017, filed herewith.
10.4f*
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (for employee grants commencing May 2017 through January 2018) under the Company’s Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2017, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4c to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended February 3, 2018, and filed April 4, 2018.
10.4g*
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (for employee grants commencing March 2018) under the Company’s Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2017, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4d to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended February 3, 2018, and filed April 4, 2018.
10.4h*
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (for employee grants commencing March 2019) under the Company’s Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2017, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4f to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended February 2, 2019, and filed April 2, 2019.
10.4i*
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (for employee grants commencing March 2020) under the Company’s Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2017, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4h to the Company’s 10-K for the year ended February 1, 2020, and filed March 31, 2020.
†10.4j*
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (for employee grants commencing March 2021) under the Company’s Incentive and Stock Compensation Plan of 2017, filed herewith.
10.5*
Form of Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Unit Agreement between the Company and its Non-Employee Directors (for grants commencing in 2015), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4a to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended January 30, 2016, and filed March 29, 2016.
102
10.6*
Caleres, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as amended and restated as of May 28, 2015, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 2, 2015, and filed June 10, 2015.
10.7*
Caleres, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP), as amended and restated as of May 28, 2015, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 2, 2015, and filed June 10, 2015.
10.8*
Caleres, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated as of May 28, 2015, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 2, 2015, and filed June 10, 2015.
10.9*
Caleres, Inc. Non-Employee Director Share Plan (2009), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 2, 2015, and filed June 10, 2015.
10.10*
Severance Agreement, effective April 1, 2006, between the Company and Diane M. Sullivan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated and filed April 6, 2006.
10.11*
Severance Agreement, dated March 24, 2009 and effective as of April 1, 2009, between the Company and Daniel R. Friedman, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2015, and filed March 31, 2015.
10.12*
Form of Amendment letter dated December 18, 2009, to the Severance Agreements between the Company and each of: Daniel R. Friedman and Diane M. Sullivan, as incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2010, and filed September 7, 2010.
10.13*
Severance Agreement, effective February 16, 2015, between the Company and Kenneth H. Hannah, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated and filed February 6, 2015.
10.14*
Severance Agreement, effective June 14, 2018, between the Company and John W. Schmidt, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 4, 2018, and filed September 12, 2018.
10.15*
Severance Agreement, effective March 6, 2019, between the Company and Molly Adams, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended February 2, 2019 and filed April 2, 2019.
†21
Subsidiaries of the registrant.
List of Guarantor Subsidiaries, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 22 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2020, and filed December 9, 2020.
†23
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
†24
Power of attorney (contained on signature page).
†31.1
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
†31.2
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
†32.1
Certification of the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
†101.INS
Inline XBRL Instance Document
†101.SCH
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
†101.CAL
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
†101.LAB
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
†101.PRE
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document
†101.DEF
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document
†104
Cover Page Interactive Data File, formatted in iXBRL and contained in Exhibit 101.
(b)Exhibits:
See Item 15(a)(3) above. On request, copies of any exhibit will be furnished to shareholders upon payment of the Company’s reasonable expenses incurred in furnishing such exhibits.
(c)Financial Statement Schedules:
See Item 8 above.
*
Denotes management contract or compensatory plan arrangements.
†
Denotes exhibit is filed with this Form 10-K.
ITEM 16FORM 10-K SUMMARY
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
By:
/s/ Kenneth H. Hannah
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 30, 2021
Know all men by these presents, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Diane M. Sullivan and Kenneth H. Hannah his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent or his substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant, on the dates and in the capacities indicated.
Signatures
Date
Title
/s/ Diane M. Sullivan
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board of Directors
(Principal Executive Officer)
(Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ Todd E. Hasty
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ Lisa A. Flavin
Lisa A. Flavin
March 24, 2021
Director
/s/ Brenda Freeman
Brenda Freeman
/s/ Lori H. Greeley
Lori H. Greeley
/s/ Mahendra R. Gupta
Mahendra R. Gupta
/s/ Carla C. Hendra
Carla C. Hendra
/s/ Ward M. Klein
Ward M. Klein
/s/ Steven W. Korn
Steven W. Korn
/s/ W. Patrick McGinnis
W. Patrick McGinnis
/s/ Wenda Harris Millard
Wenda Harris Millard
105