Cato Fashion - 10-K annual report

Class A Common Stock

Preferred Share Purchase Rights

None

     Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes þ          No o

     Indicate by check mark, if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of the Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).     Yes þ          No o

     The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s Class A Common Stock held by Non-affiliates of the Registrant as of July 31, 2004, the last business day of the Company’s most recent second quarter, was $420,193,294 based on the last reported sale price per share on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on that date.

     As of March 29, 2005, there were 20,367,720 shares of Class A Common Stock and 460,350 shares of Convertible Class B Common Stock outstanding.

     Portions of the proxy statement relating to the 2005 annual meeting of shareholders are incorporated by reference into the following part of this annual report:

Part III — Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14

(This page intentionally left blank)

      The following discussion and analysis should be read along with the Consolidated Financial Statements, including the accompanying Notes appearing later in this report. Any of the following are “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended: (1) statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that reflect projections or expectations of our future financial or economic performance; (2) statements that are not historical information; (3) statements of our beliefs, intentions, plans and objectives for future operations, including those contained in “Business”, “Properties”, “Legal Proceedings”, “Controls and Procedures” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”; (4) statements relating to our operations or activities for 2005 and beyond; and (5) statements relating to our future contingencies. Words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “approximates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “hopes”, “intends”, “may”, “plans”, “should” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. No assurance can be given that actual results or events will not differ materially from those projected, estimated, assumed or anticipated in any such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements included in this report are based on information available to us as of the filing date of this report, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking information contained in this report.

      Our website is located at www.catocorp.com. We make available free of charge, through our website, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and other reports (including amendments to these reports) filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These reports are available as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file those materials with the SEC. We also post on our website the charters of our Audit, Compensation and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees; our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics; and any amendments or waivers thereto; and any other corporate governance materials contemplated by SEC or New York Stock Exchange regulations. The documents are also available in print to any shareholder who requests by contacting our corporate secretary at our company offices.

      The Company, founded in 1946, operated 1,177 women’s fashion specialty stores at January 29, 2005, under the names “Cato,” “Cato Fashions,” “Cato Plus” and “It’s Fashion!” in 29 states, principally in the southeastern United States. The Company offers quality fashion apparel and accessories at low prices, every day in junior/ missy and plus sizes. Additionally, the Company offers clothing for girls sizes 7 to 16 in selected locations. The Company’s stores feature a broad assortment of apparel and accessories, including casual and dressy sportswear, dresses, careerwear, coats, shoes, costume jewelry and handbags. A major portion of the Company’s merchandise is sold under its private labels and is produced by various vendors in accordance with the Company’s specifications. Most stores range in size from 4,000 to 6,000 square feet and are located primarily in strip shopping centers anchored by national discounters or market-dominant grocery stores. The Company emphasizes friendly customer service and coordinated merchandise presentations in an appealing store environment. The Company offers its own credit card and layaway plan. Credit and layaway sales represented 14% of retail sales in fiscal 2004. See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Reportable Segment Information” for a discussion of segment information.

      We have restated the consolidated balance sheet at January 31, 2004, and the consolidated statements of income, cash flows and stockholders’ equity for the years ended January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We have also restated the quarterly financial information for fiscal 2003 and the first three quarters of fiscal 2004. See Note 13 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The restatement also affects periods prior to fiscal 2002. The impact of the restatement on such prior periods has been reflected as an adjustment to retained earnings as of February 2, 2002 in the accompanying consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity. We have also restated the applicable financial information for fiscal 2000, fiscal 2001, fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2003 in “Item 6. Selected Financial Data.” The restatement corrects our historical lease accounting practices. For information with respect to the restatement, see Note 1 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements. We did not amend our previously filed Annual Report on Form 10-K or Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the restatement, and the financial statements and related financial information contained in such reports should no longer be relied upon. Throughout this Form 10-K all referenced amounts for prior periods and prior period comparisons reflect the balances and amounts on a restated basis.

      The Company’s primary objective is to be the leading fashion specialty retailer for fashion and value conscious females in its markets. Management believes the Company’s success is dependent upon its ability to differentiate its stores from department stores, mass merchandise discount stores and competing women’s specialty stores. The key elements of the Company’s business strategy are:

     Merchandise Assortment. The Company’s stores offer a wide assortment of apparel and accessory items in junior/ missy and plus sizes and emphasize color, product coordination and selection.

     Value Pricing. The Company offers quality merchandise that is generally priced below comparable merchandise offered by department stores and mall specialty apparel chains, but is generally more fashionable than merchandise offered by discount stores. Management believes that the Company has positioned itself as the everyday low price leader in its market segment.

     Strip Shopping Center Locations. The Company locates its stores principally in convenient strip centers anchored by national discounters or market-dominant grocery stores that attract large numbers of potential customers.

     Customer Service. Store managers and sales associates are trained to provide prompt and courteous service and to assist customers in merchandise selection and wardrobe coordination.

     Credit and Layaway Programs. The Company offers its own credit card and a layaway plan to make the purchase of its merchandise more convenient.

     Expansion. The Company plans to continue to expand into northern, midwestern and western adjacent states, as well as continuing to fill-in existing southeastern core geography.

      The Company offers a broad selection of high quality and exceptional value apparel and accessories to suit the various lifestyles of the fashion and value conscious females. In addition, the Company offers on-trend fashion in exciting colors with consistent fit and quality.

      The Company’s merchandise lines include dressy, career, and casual sportswear, dresses, coats, shoes, lingerie, costume jewelry and handbags. Apparel for girls sizes 7 to 16 is offered in approximately 1,000 stores. The Company primarily offers exclusive merchandise with fashion and quality comparable to mall specialty stores at low prices, every day.

      The collaboration of the merchandising team with an expanded in-house product development and direct sourcing function has enhanced merchandise offerings delivering quality exclusive products at lower costs. The product development and direct sourcing operations provide research on emerging fashion and color trends, technical services and direct sourcing options.

      As a part of its merchandising strategy, members of the Company’s merchandising staff frequently visit selected stores, monitor the merchandise offerings of other retailers, regularly communicate with store operations associates and frequently confer with key vendors. The Company tests most new fashion-sensitive items in selected stores to aid it in determining their appeal before making a substantial purchasing commitment. The Company also takes aggressive markdowns on slow-selling merchandise and does not carry over merchandise to the next season.

      Although the Company purchases merchandise from approximately 1,500 suppliers, most of its merchandise is purchased from approximately 100 primary vendors. In fiscal 2004, purchases from the Company’s largest vendor accounted for approximately 6% of the Company’s total purchases. No other vendor accounted for more than 3% of total purchases. The Company is not dependent on its largest vendor or any other vendor for merchandise purchases and the loss of any single vendor or group of vendors would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operating results or financial condition. A substantial portion of the Company’s merchandise is sold under its private labels and is produced by various vendors in accordance with the Company’s strict specifications. The Company purchases most of its merchandise from domestic importers and vendors, which typically minimizes the time necessary to purchase and obtain shipments in order to enable the Company to react to merchandise trends in a more timely fashion. Although a significant portion of the Company’s merchandise is manufactured overseas, principally in the Far East, any economic, political or social unrest in any one region is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s ability to obtain adequate supplies of merchandise.

      An important component of the Company’s strategy is the allocation of merchandise to individual stores based on an analysis of sales trends by merchandise category, customer profiles and climatic conditions. A merchandise control system provides current information on the sales activity of each merchandise style in each of the Company’s stores. Point-of-sale terminals in the stores collect and transmit sales and inventory information to the Company’s central database, permitting timely response to sales trends on a store-by-store basis.

      All merchandise is shipped directly to the Company’s distribution center in Charlotte, North Carolina, where it is inspected and then allocated by the merchandise distribution staff for shipment to individual stores. The flow of merchandise from receipt at the distribution center to shipment to stores is controlled by an on-line system. Shipments are made by common carrier, and each store receives at least one shipment per week.

      The Company uses radio, in store signage, graphics and a Company website as its primary advertising media. The Company uses radio advertising in selected trade areas. The Company’s total advertising expenditures were approximately .8% of retail sales in fiscal 2004.

      The Company’s store operations management team consists of 1 director of stores, 4 territorial managers, 15 regional managers and 120 district managers. Regional managers receive a salary plus a bonus based on achieving targeted goals for sales, payroll, shrinkage control and store profitability. District managers receive a salary plus a bonus based on achieving targeted objectives for district sales increases and shrinkage control. Stores are staffed with a manager, two assistant managers and additional part-time sales associates depending on the size of the store and seasonal personnel needs. Store managers receive a salary and all other store personnel are paid on an hourly basis. Store managers, assistant managers and sales associates are eligible for monthly and semi-annual bonuses based on achieving targeted goals for their store’s sales increases and shrinkage control.

      The Company is constantly improving its training programs to develop associates. Over 80% of store and field management are promoted from within, allowing the Company to internally staff an expanding store base. The Company has training programs at each level of store operations. New store managers are trained in training stores managed by experienced associates who have achieved superior results in meeting the Company’s goals for store sales, payroll expense and shrinkage control. The type and extent of district manager training varies depending on whether the district manager is promoted from within or recruited from outside the Company. All district managers receive at a minimum a one-week orientation program at the Company’s corporate office.

      Most of the Company’s stores are located in the southeastern United States in a variety of markets ranging from small towns to large metropolitan areas with trade area populations of 20,000 or more. Stores range in size from 4,000 to 6,000 square feet and average approximately 4,500 square feet.

      All of the Company’s stores are leased. Approximately 93% are located in strip shopping centers and 7% in enclosed shopping malls. The Company locates stores in strip shopping centers anchored by a national discounter, primarily Wal-Mart Supercenters, or market-dominant grocery stores. The Company’s strip center locations provide ample parking and shopping convenience for its customers.

      The Company’s store development activities consist of opening new stores in new and existing markets, and relocating selected existing stores to more desirable locations in the same market area. The following table sets forth information with respect to the Company’s development activities since fiscal 2000.

      In Fiscal 2004 the Company relocated 29 stores and remodeled 17 stores.

      In Fiscal 2005 the Company plans to open approximately 90 new stores, relocate 20 stores, close 10 stores, and remodel 15 stores.

      The Company periodically reviews its store base to determine whether any particular store should be closed based on its sales trends and profitability. The Company intends to continue this review process to close underperforming stores. The five stores closed in 2004 were not material to the Company’s results of operations.

      The Company offers its own credit card, which accounted for approximately 9% of retail sales in fiscal 2004. The Company’s net bad debt expense in fiscal 2004 was 7.3% of credit sales.

      Customers applying for the Company’s credit card are approved for credit if they have a satisfactory credit record and meet minimum income criteria. Customers are required to make minimum monthly payments based on their account balances. If the balance is not paid in full each month, the Company assesses the customer a finance charge. If payments are not received on time, the customer is assessed a late fee.

      Under the Company’s layaway plan, merchandise is set aside for customers who agree to make periodic payments. The Company adds a nonrefundable administrative fee to each layaway sale. If no payment is made for four weeks, the customer is considered to have defaulted, and the merchandise is returned to the selling floor and again offered for sale, often at a reduced price. All payments made by customers who subsequently default on their layaway purchase are returned to the customer upon request, less the administrative fee and a restocking fee. The Company defers recognition of layaway sales and its related fees to the accounting period when the customer picks up layaway merchandise. Layaway sales represented approximately 5% of retail sales in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002.

      The Company’s systems provide daily financial and merchandising information that is used by management to enhance the timeliness and effectiveness of purchasing and pricing decisions. Management uses a daily report comparing actual sales with planned sales and a weekly ranking report to monitor and control purchasing decisions. Weekly reports are also produced which reflect sales, weeks of supply of inventory and other critical data by product categories, by store and by various levels of responsibility reporting. Purchases are made based on projected sales but can be modified to accommodate unexpected increases or decreases in demand for a particular item.

      Sales information is projected by merchandise category and, in some cases, is further projected and actual performance measured by stock keeping unit (SKU). Merchandise allocation models are used to distribute merchandise to individual stores based upon historical sales trends, climatic differences, customer demographic differences and targeted inventory turnover rates.

      The women’s retail apparel industry is highly competitive. The Company believes that the principal competitive factors in its industry include merchandise assortment and presentation, fashion, price, store location and customer service. The Company competes with retail chains that operate similar women’s apparel specialty stores. In addition, the Company competes with mass merchandise chains, discount store chains and major department stores. To the extent that the Company opens stores in larger cities and metropolitan areas, competition is expected to be more intense in those markets.

      A variety of laws affect the revolving credit program offered by the Company. The Federal Consumer Credit Protection Act (Truth-in Lending) and Regulation Z promulgated thereunder require written disclosure of information relating to such financing, including the amount of the annual percentage rate and the finance charge. The Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act also requires certain disclosures to potential customers concerning credit information used as a basis to deny credit. The Federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B promulgated thereunder prohibit discrimination against any credit applicant based on certain specified grounds. The Federal Trade Commission has adopted or proposed various trade regulation rules dealing with unfair credit and collection practices and the preservation of consumers’ claims and defenses. The Company is also subject to the U.S. Patriot Act and the Bank Secrecy Act which require the Company to monitor account holders and account transactions, respectively. Additionally, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act requires the Company to disclose, initially and annually, to its customers, the Company’s privacy policy as it relates to a customer’s non-public personal information.

      As of January 29, 2005, the Company employed approximately 9,600 full-time and part-time associates. The Company also employs additional part-time associates during the peak retailing seasons. The Company is not a party to any collective bargaining agreements and considers that its associate relations are good.

      The Company’s distribution center and general offices are located in a Company-owned building of approximately 492,000 square feet located on a 15-acre tract in Charlotte, North Carolina. The Company’s automated merchandise handling and distribution activities occupy approximately 418,000 square feet of this building and its general offices and corporate training center are located in the remaining 74,000 square feet. A building of approximately 24,000 square feet located on a 2-acre tract adjacent to the Company’s existing location is used for receiving and staging shipments prior to processing.

      Substantially all of the Company’s retail stores are leased from unaffiliated parties. Most of the leases have an initial term of five years, with two to three five-year renewal options. Many of the leases provide for fixed rentals plus a percentage of sales in excess of a specified volume.

      From time to time, claims are asserted against the Company arising out of operations in the ordinary course of business. The Company currently is not a party to any pending litigation that it believes is likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial conditions or results of operations.

      None.

      The executive officers of the Company and their ages as of March 31, 2005 are as follows:

     John P. Derham Cato has been employed as an officer of the Company since 1981 and has been a director of the Company since 1986. Since January 2004, he has served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. From May 1999 to January 2004, he served as President, Vice Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. From June 1997 to May 1999, he served as President, Vice Chairman of the Board and Chief Operating Officer. From August 1996 to June 1997, he served as Vice Chairman of the Board and Chief Operating Officer. From 1989 to 1996, he managed the Company’s off-price division, serving as Executive Vice President and as President and General Manager of the It’s Fashion! Division from 1993 to August 1996. Mr. John Cato is currently a director of Ruddick Corporation.

     Michael O. Moore has been employed by the Company as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary since July 1998 and has been a director of the Company since 2002. Mr. Moore served as Vice President, Chief Financial Officer for Party Experience from 1997 to 1998, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of David’s Bridal from 1994 to 1997, and was employed by Bloomingdales from 1984 to 1994 serving as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer from 1990 to 1994.

     B. Allen Weinstein joined the Company as Executive Vice President, Chief Merchandising Officer of the Cato Division in August 1997. Since November 2004, he has served as Executive Vice President, Chief Merchandising Officer of the Company. From 1995 to 1997, he was Senior Vice President — Merchandising of Catherines Stores Corporation. From 1981 to 1995, he served as Senior Vice President of Merchandising for Beall’s, Inc.

     Howard A. Severson has been employed by the Company since 1985. Since January 1993, he has served as Executive Vice President, Chief Real Estate and Store Development Officer and Assistant Secretary. From 1993 to 2001 Mr. Severson also served as a director. From August 1989 through January 1993, Mr. Severson served as Senior Vice President — Chief Real Estate Officer.

     Michael T. Greer has been employed by the Company since 1985. Since November 2004, he has served as Senior Vice President, Director of Stores of the Company. From February 2004 through November 2004, he served as Senior Vice President, Director of Stores of the Cato Division. From 2002 to 2003 Mr. Greer served as Vice President, Director of Stores of the It’s Fashion! Division. From 1999 to 2001 he served as Territorial Vice President of Stores of the Cato Division and from 1996 to 1999 he served as Regional Vice President of Stores of the Cato Division. From 1985 to 1995, Mr. Greer held various store operational positions in the Cato Division.

     Robert C. Brummer joined the Company as Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Assistant Secretary in January 2001. From 1999 through 2000, he was employed by Sleepy’s, a beddings specialty retailer, as Vice President, Human Resources and Payroll. From 1997 through 1998, he was Vice President, Human Resources and Loss Prevention for The Party Experience, a party supplies specialty retailer. From 1995 until 1997, he was Vice President, Human Resources and Loss Prevention for No Body Beats The Wiz, an electronics specialty store chain.

      The Company’s Class A Common Stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol CTR. As required by Section 3.03A.12(a) of the NYSE listing standards, The Cato Corporation filed with the NYSE the certification of its Chief Executive Officer that he is not aware of any violation by the company of NYSE corporate governance listing standards. Below is the market range and dividend information for the four quarters of fiscal 2004 and 2003.

      As of March 29, 2005 the approximate number of record holders of the Company’s Class A Common Stock was 1,279 and there were 3 record holders of the Company’s Class B Common Stock.

      Certain selected financial data for the five fiscal years ended January 29, 2005 have been derived from the Company’s audited financial statements. The financial statements and Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s reports for the three most recent fiscal years are contained elsewhere in this report. All data set forth below are qualified by reference to, and should be read in conjunction with, the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements (including the Notes thereto) and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” appearing elsewhere in this annual report.

      The five-year selected consolidated financial data presented in this Item 6 has been revised to reflect a restatement. For information with respect to the restatement, see Note 1 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

      We have restated the consolidated balance sheet at January 31, 2004, and the consolidated statements of income, cash flows and stockholders’ equity for the years ended January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to correct our historical lease, inbound freight capitalization and vendor allowance accounting practices. We have also restated our quarterly financial information for fiscal 2003 and the first three quarters of fiscal 2004. See Note 13 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The restatement also affects periods prior to fiscal 2002. The impact of the restatement on such prior periods has been reflected as an adjustment of $7.3 million to retained earnings as of February 2, 2002 in the accompanying consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity. We have also restated the applicable financial information for fiscal 2000, fiscal 2001, fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2003 in “Item 6. Selected Financial Data.”

      After the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission issued a letter on February 7, 2005 we, like many other retailers, reviewed our lease accounting practices and determined that certain corrections were needed. As a result, we corrected our lease accounting practices for fiscal 2004 and restated certain historical financial information. The restatement corrections did not impact cash payments and had no impact on revenues, comparable store sales or operating cash flows.

      The Company corrected its lease accounting practices to recognize lease expense on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term (as that term is defined by Statement of Financial Accounting No. 13, as amended “SFAS No. 13”) beginning on the date the Company takes possession of the leased property, including lease renewal periods that are required to be included in the lease term because of economic penalties that result in the renewal being reasonably assured. Likewise, the Company corrected its practices to recognize landlord allowances on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

      The restatement includes adjustments to cost of goods sold, gross margin, operating income, income before taxes, income tax provision, net income and earnings per share. This correction to our lease accounting practices reduced net income by $484,000 and diluted earnings per share by $0.02 in fiscal 2004. The corrections decreased net income by $775,000 or $0.03 per diluted share in fiscal year 2003 and by $366,000 or $0.02 per diluted share in fiscal 2002. In addition, the Company increased net income by $400,000 or $0.01 per diluted share in fiscal 2003 and decreased net income by $22,000 in fiscal 2002 to properly capitalize inbound freight on domestic purchases and to properly account for vendor allowances.

      For information with respect to the restatement adjustments, see Note 1 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

      We did not amend our previously filed Annual Reports on Form 10-K for fiscal years 2003 and 2002 or Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for fiscal year 2004 for the restatement, and, accordingly, the financial statements and related financial information contained in such reports should no longer be relied upon.

      Throughout “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” all referenced amounts for prior periods and prior period comparisons reflect the balances and amounts on a restated basis.

      The table below sets forth certain financial data of the Company expressed as a percentage of retail sales for the years indicated:

      Retail sales increased by 6% to $773.8 million in fiscal 2004 compared to $731.8 million in fiscal 2003. Total revenues, comprised of retail sales and other income (principally finance charges and late fees on customer accounts receivable and layaway fees), increased by 6% to $789.6 million in fiscal 2004 compared to $747.3 million in fiscal 2003. The Company operated 1,177 stores at January 29, 2005 compared to 1,102 stores operated at January 31, 2004.

      The increase in retail sales in fiscal 2004 was attributable to improved merchandise offerings and an increase in store development activity. In fiscal 2004, the Company opened 80 new stores, relocated 29 stores, remodeled 17 stores and closed 5 stores.

      Credit revenue of $14.2 million, represented 1.8% of total revenue in fiscal 2004. This is comparable to 2003 credit revenue of $14.5 million or 1.9% of total revenue. Credit revenue is comprised of interest earned on the Company’s private label credit card portfolio and related fee income. Related expenses include principally bad debt expense, payroll, postage and other administrative expenses and totaled $8.7 million in fiscal 2004 compared to $9.7 million in fiscal 2003. The decrease in costs was principally due to lower bad debt expense in fiscal 2004. See Note 14 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for a schedule of credit related expenses. Total credit income before taxes increased $0.7 million from $4.7 million in 2003 to $5.4 million in 2004 due to the decreased bad debt expense, partially offset by decreased credit revenue. Total credit income in 2004 represented 9.9% of income before taxes of $54.7 million.

      Other income in total, as included in total revenues in fiscal 2004, increased slightly to $15.8 million from $15.5 million in fiscal 2003. The increase resulted primarily from an increase in late charges.

      Cost of goods sold was $528.9 million, or 68.4% of retail sales, in fiscal 2004 compared to $509.0 million, or 69.6% of retail sales, in fiscal 2003. The decrease in cost of goods sold as a percent of retail sales resulted primarily from reduced markdowns. Cost of goods sold includes merchandise costs, net of discounts and allowances, buying costs, distribution costs, occupancy costs, freight and inventory shrinkage. Net merchandise costs and in-bound freight are capitalized as inventory costs. Buying and distribution costs include payroll, payroll-related costs and operating expenses for the buying departments and distribution center. Occupancy expenses include rent, real estate taxes, insurance, common area maintenance, utilities and maintenance for stores and distribution facilities. Total gross margin dollars (retail sales less cost of goods sold) increased by 10% to $244.9 million in fiscal 2004 from $222.8 million in fiscal 2003. Gross margin as presented may not be comparable to those of other entities. For example, others may include internal transfer costs in selling, general and administrative expenses while the Company classifies them as cost of goods sold.

      Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) primarily include corporate and store payroll, related payroll taxes and benefits, insurance, supplies, advertising, bank and credit card processing fees and bad debts and were $187.6 million in fiscal 2004 compared to $174.2 million in fiscal 2003, an increase of 8%. As a percent of retail sales, SG&A was 24.2% compared to 23.8% in the prior year. The overall increase in SG&A resulted primarily from increased incentive and discretionary bonuses and increased infrastructure expenses attributable to the Company’s store development activities.

      Depreciation expense was $20.4 million in fiscal 2004 compared to $18.7 million in fiscal 2003. The 9% increase in fiscal 2004 resulted primarily from the Company’s store development activity.

      Interest and other income was $2.7 million in fiscal 2004 compared to $3.6 million in fiscal 2003. The 25% decrease in fiscal 2004 resulted primarily from the Company’s lower cash and short-term investment position following the repurchase of $98.3 million of Company stock in fiscal 2003.

      Income tax expense was $19.9 million, or 2.6% of retail sales in fiscal 2004 compared to $17.7, or 2.4% of retail sales in fiscal 2003. The increase resulted from higher pre-tax income. The effective tax rate was 36.3% in both fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003. The Company expects the effective rate in 2005 to be in the range of 36% to 37%.

      Retail sales were flat at $731.8 million in fiscal 2003 compared to $732.7 million in fiscal 2002. Total revenues were flat at $747.3 million in fiscal 2003 compared to $748.3 million in fiscal 2002. The Company operated 1,102 stores at January 31, 2004 compared to 1,022 stores operated at February 1, 2003.

      The flat retail sales in fiscal 2003 were attributable to the soft economy. In fiscal 2003, the Company increased its number of stores 8% by opening 87 new stores, relocating 28 stores, remodeling 15 stores and closing 7 stores.

      Credit revenues increased $0.5 million from $14.0 million in 2002 to $14.5 million in 2003 mainly due to increased finance charges and late fees. Credit revenues represented 1.9% of total revenues in both 2003 and 2002. Related expenses totaled $9.7 million in 2003 compared to $8.5 million in 2002 principally due to higher bad debt expenses in 2003. Total credit income before taxes decreased $0.8 million from $5.5 million in 2002 to $4.7 million in 2003 as a result of the increased costs partially offset by increased credit revenue. Total credit income in 2003 represented 9.7% of income before taxes of $48.7 million.

      Other income in total, as included in total revenues in fiscal 2003, decreased slightly to $15.5 million from $15.6 million in fiscal 2002. The decrease resulted primarily from a decline in layaway fees.

      Cost of goods sold was $509.0 million, or 69.6% of retail sales, in fiscal 2003 compared to $497.0 million, or 67.8% of retail sales, in fiscal 2002. The increase in cost of goods sold as a percent of retail sales resulted primarily from lower than planned sales and additional markdowns.

      SG&A expenses were $174.2 million in fiscal 2003 compared to $168.9 million in fiscal 2002, an increase of 3%. As a percent of retail sales, SG&A was 23.8% compared to 23.1% in the prior year. The overall increase in SG&A resulted primarily from increased selling-related expenses and increased infrastructure expenses attributable to the Company’s store development activities.

      Depreciation expense was $18.7 million in fiscal 2003 compared to $14.9 million in fiscal 2002. The 25% increase in fiscal 2003 resulted primarily from the Company’s store development and the implementation of an enterprise-wide information system.

      Interest and other income was $3.6 million in fiscal 2003 compared to $3.7 million in fiscal 2002. The 3% decrease in fiscal 2003 resulted primarily from the Company’s lower cash and short-term investment position following the repurchase of $98.3 million of Company stock in fiscal 2003.

      Income tax expense was $17.7 million, or 2.4% of retail sales in fiscal 2003 compared to $25.8 million, or 3.5% of retail sales in fiscal 2002. The decrease resulted from lower pre-tax income.

      The Company is not a party to any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on the Company’s financial condition, revenues, expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

      The Company’s accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. As disclosed in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the preparation of the Company’s financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty. Therefore, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment. Actual results inevitably will differ from those estimates, and such differences may be material to the financial statements. The most significant accounting estimates inherent in the preparation of the Company’s financial statements include the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, reserves relating to workers’ compensation, general and auto insurance liabilities, reserves for inventory markdowns, calculation of asset impairment, shrink accrual and tax contingency reserves.

      The Company’s critical accounting policies and estimates are discussed with the Audit Committee.

      The Company evaluates the collectibility of accounts receivable and records an allowance for doubtful accounts based on estimates of actual write-offs and the accounts receivable aging roll rates over a period of up to 12 months. The allowance is reviewed for adequacy and adjusted, as necessary, on a monthly basis. The Company also provides for estimated uncollectible late fees charged based on historical write-offs. The Company’s financial results can be significantly impacted by changes in bad debt write-off experience and the aging of the accounts receivable portfolio.

      The Company is primarily self-insured for health care, property loss, workers’ compensation and general liability costs. These costs are significant primarily due to the large number of the Company’s retail locations and employees. The Company’s self-insurance liabilities are based on the total estimated costs of claims filed and estimates of claims incurred but not reported, less amounts paid against such claims, and are not discounted. Management reviews current and historical claims data in developing its estimates. The Company also uses information provided by outside actuaries with respect to workers’ compensation and general liability claims. If the underlying facts and circumstances of the claims change or the historical experience upon which insurance provisions are recorded is not indicative of future trends, then the Company may be required to make adjustments to the provision for insurance costs that could be material to the Company’s reported financial condition and results of operations. Historically, actual results have not significantly deviated from estimates.

      While the Company’s recognition of revenue is predominantly derived from routine retail transactions and does not involve significant judgement, revenue recognition represents an important accounting policy of the Company. As discussed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company recognizes sales at the point of purchase when the customer takes possession of the merchandise and pays for the purchase, generally with cash or credit. Sales from purchases made with Cato credit, gift cards and layaway sales are also recorded when the customer takes possession of the merchandise. Gift cards, layaway deposits and merchandise credits granted to customers are recorded as deferred revenue until they are redeemed or forfeited. A provision is made for estimated product returns based on sales volumes and the Company’s experience; actual returns have not varied materially from amounts provided historically.

      Credit revenue on the Company’s private label credit card portfolio is recognized as earned under the interest method. Late fees are recognized as earned, less provisions for estimated uncollectible fees.

      The Company primarily invests in property and equipment in connection with the opening and remodeling of stores and in computer software and hardware. Most of the Company’s store leases give the Company the option to terminate the lease if certain specified sales volumes are not achieved during the first few years of the lease although we have exercised this right infrequently. The Company periodically reviews its store locations and estimates the recoverability of its assets, recording an impairment charge, if necessary, when the Company decides to close the store or otherwise determines that future undiscounted cash flows associated with those assets will not be sufficient to recover the carrying value. This determination is based on a number of factors, including the store’s historical operating results and cash flows, estimated future sales growth, real estate development in the area and perceived local market conditions that can be difficult to predict and may be subject to change. In addition, the Company regularly evaluates its computer-related and other long-lived assets and may accelerate depreciation over the revised useful life if the asset is expected to be replaced or has limited future value. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in income for that period.

      The Company provides for estimated liabilities for potential income and other tax assessments for which actual settlement may differ materially from amounts provided.

      The Company’s inventory is valued using the retail method of accounting and is stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market. Under the retail inventory method, the valuation of inventory at cost and resulting gross margin are calculated by applying an average cost to retail ratio to the retail value of inventory. The retail inventory method is an averaging method that has been widely used in the retail industry. Inherent in the retail method are certain significant estimates including initial merchandise markup, markdowns and shrinkage, which significantly impact the ending inventory valuation at cost and the resulting gross margins. Physical inventories are conducted throughout the year to calculate actual shrinkage and inventory on hand. Estimates based on actual shrinkage results are used to estimate inventory shrinkage, which is accrued for the period between the last inventory and the financial reporting date. The Company continuously reviews its inventory levels to identify slow moving merchandise and uses markdowns to clear slow moving inventory. The general economic environment for retail apparel sales could result in an increase in the level of markdowns, which would result in lower inventory values and increases to cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales in future periods. Management makes estimates regarding markdowns based on inventory levels on hand and customer demand, which may impact inventory valuations. Markdown exposure with respect to inventories on hand is limited due to the fact that seasonal merchandise is not carried forward. Historically, actual results have not significantly deviated from those determined using the estimates described above.

      The Company recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term as defined in SFAS No. 13. Our lease agreements generally provide for scheduled rent increases during the lease term or rent holidays, including rental payments commencing at a date other than the date of initial occupancy. We include any rent escalation and rent holidays in our straight-line rent expense. In addition, we record landlord allowances for normal tenant improvements as deferred rent, which is included in other non-current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. This deferred rent is amortized over the lease term as a reduction of rent expense. Also, leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the related lease term. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the Company’s accounting for its leases.

      The Company has consistently maintained a strong liquidity position. Cash provided by operating activities during fiscal 2004 was $79.9 million as compared to $59.3 million in fiscal 2003. These amounts have enabled the Company to fund its regular operating needs, capital expenditure program, cash dividend payments and any repurchase of the Company’s Common Stock. In addition, the Company maintains $35 million of unsecured revolving credit facilities for short-term financing of seasonal cash needs.

      The Company believes that its cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, together with cash flows from operations and borrowings available under its revolving credit agreement, will be adequate to fund the Company’s proposed capital expenditures and other operating requirements over the next twelve months and for the foreseeable future beyond twelve months.

      At January 29, 2005, the Company had working capital of $133.8 million compared to $117.4 million at January 31, 2004. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2004 is primarily the result of an increase in net income of $3.8 million; an increase in depreciation expense of $1.7 million due to store expansion; a reduction in accounts receivable from strong collection efforts of $1.4 million; a reduction of merchandise inventories of $1.2 million; a reduction of prepaid expense of $4.7 million; and an increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities of $15.0 million. Offsetting these increases in net cash provided by operating activities was a decrease in deferred income taxes of $5.6 million and decrease of $1.5 million in accrued income taxes.

      Additionally, the Company had $1.8 million invested in privately managed investment funds at January 31, 2005, which are reported under other assets of the consolidated balance sheets.

      At January 29, 2005, the Company had an unsecured revolving credit agreement, which provided for borrowings of up to $35 million. The revolving credit agreement is committed until August 2006. This agreement replaced a prior revolving credit agreement which was due to expire in October 2004. The credit agreement contains various financial covenants and limitations, including the maintenance of specific financial ratios with which the Company was in compliance as of January 29, 2005. There were no borrowings outstanding under these credit facilities during the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005 or January 31, 2004.

      The Company had approximately $3.5 million and $5.4 million at January 29, 2005 and January 31, 2004, respectively, of outstanding irrevocable letters of credit relating to purchase commitments.

      Expenditures for property and equipment totaled $25.3 million, $20.6 million and $29.0 million in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The expenditures for fiscal 2004 were primarily for store development, store remodels and investments in new technology. In fiscal 2005, the Company is planning to invest approximately $33 million in capital expenditures. This includes expenditures to open 90 new stores, relocate 20 stores and close 10 stores. In addition, the Company plans to remodel 15 stores and has planned for additional investments in technology scheduled to be implemented over the next 12 months.

      During 2003, the Company repurchased 5,137,484 shares of Class B Common Stock from a limited partnership and trust affiliated with Wayland H. Cato, Jr., a Company founder and then Chairman of the Board, and a limited partnership affiliated with Edgar T. Cato, a Company founder and then a member of the Board of Directors. Shares were purchased at $18.50 per share for a total cost of $95,043,454. Including related expenses of $520,000 for investment banking and related professional fees, the total cost was $95,563,454 or an average purchase price of $18.60 per share. The repurchase was funded by the Company through a new $30 million five-year term loan facility and approximately $65 million of cash and liquidated short-term investments. Payments on the new term loan were due in monthly installments of $500,000 plus accrued interest, based on LIBOR. The LIBOR rate at January 29, 2005 was 2.59%.

      During 2003, the Company entered into retirement agreements with Mr. Wayland H. Cato, Jr., a Company founder and Chairman of the Board and Mr. Edgar T. Cato, a Company founder and a member of the Board of Directors. The agreements provided for the retirement of Mr. Wayland Cato and Mr. Edgar Cato from the Company and the Board of Directors effective January 31, 2004. The Company recognized an expense of $2.8 million representing the present value of certain payments and benefits under the terms of the

agreements. The after-tax charge was $1.8 million or $.08 per diluted share in fiscal 2003. Additionally, during 2003, the Company repurchased 165,000 shares of Class A Common Stock for $2,740,619, or an average market price of $16.61 per share.

      Over the course of 2003, the Board of Directors increased the quarterly dividend by 7% from $.15 per share to $.16 per share. During fiscal 2004, the Company increased its quarterly dividend by 9% from $.16 per share to $.175 per share.

      On April 5, 2005, the Company repaid the remaining balance of $20.5 million on the $30 million five-year term loan facility. With the early retirement of this loan, the Company had no outstanding debt as of April 5, 2005.

      The Company does not use derivative financial instruments. At January 29, 2005, the Company’s investment portfolio was invested in governmental and other debt securities with maturities of up to 36 months. These securities are classified as available-for-sale and are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value with unrealized gains and temporary losses reported net of taxes as accumulated other comprehensive income. Other than temporary declines in fair value of investments are recorded as a reduction in the cost of investments in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and as a reduction of interest and other income in the accompanying Statements of Consolidated Income.

      The following table shows the Company’s obligations and commitments as of January 29, 2005, to make future payments under contractual obligations (in thousands):

      In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement No. 123R (“SFAS 123R”), “Share-Based Payment,” a revision of FASB issued Statement No. 123 (“SFAS 123”),“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” SFAS 123R required the measurement of all stock-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options and stock purchase rights granted pursuant to certain employee stock purchase plans, using a fair-value based method and the recording of such expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. The accounting provisions of SFAS 123R are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2005. Accordingly, we are required to adopt SFAS 123R in the first quarter of 2006. The pro forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS 123 will no longer be an alternative to financial statement recognition. See Note 1 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the pro forma net income and earnings per share amounts for fiscal 2002 through fiscal 2004, as if we had used a fair-value based method similar to the methods required under SFAS 123R to measure compensation expense for employee stock-based compensation awards. We are currently evaluating the provisions of SFAS 123R. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements. Based on our current projections, we expect the future expense to be recognized as a result of the adoption of SFAS 123R to be similar to the pro forma amounts disclosed for fiscal 2004 in the notes to our consolidated financial statements.

      In November 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 151 (“SFAS 151”), “Inventory Costs.”SFAS 151 amends the guidance in Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, “Inventory Pricing,” to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). SFAS 151 requires that those items be recognized as current period changes and that the allocation of fixed production overheads to the cost of converting work in process to finished goods be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. This statement is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years

beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

      The Company is subject to market rate risk from exposure to changes in interest rates based on its financing, investing and cash management.

      We have completed an integrated audit of The Cato Corporation’s 2004 consolidated financial statements and of its internal control over financial reporting as of January 29, 2005 and audits of its 2003 consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Our opinions, based on our audits, are presented below.

      In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(1) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Cato Corporation and its subsidiaries at January 29, 2005 and January 31, 2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended January 29, 2005 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule for the years ended January 29, 2005 and January 31, 2004, listed in the index appearing under Item 8 presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit of financial statements includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

      As described in Note 1, Restatement of Prior Financial Information, the Company restated its previously issued financial statements for year ended January 31, 2004.

      Also, in our opinion, management’s assessment, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A, that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 29, 2005 based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on those criteria. Furthermore, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 29, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the COSO. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on management’s assessment and on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. An audit of internal control over financial reporting includes obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we consider necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.

      A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external

      Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

April 28, 2005

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows of The Cato Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) for the year ended February 1, 2003. Our audit also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a) for the year ended February 1, 2003. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and the financial statement schedule based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as, evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the results of the operations and cash flows for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2003 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth herein.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the accompanying consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year ended February 1, 2003 have been restated.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

April 21, 2003 (April 25, 2005 as to the effects of the restatement discussed in Note 1)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

     Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of The Cato Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (“the Company”). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

     Description of Business and Fiscal Year: The Company has two business segments — the operation of women’s fashion specialty stores and a credit card division. The apparel specialty stores operate under the names “Cato”, “Cato Fashions”, “Cato Plus” and “It’s Fashion!” and are located primarily in strip shopping centers in the southeastern United States. The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest January 31.

     Use of Estimates: The preparation of the Company’s financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant accounting estimates reflected in the Company’s financial statements include the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, reserves relating to self insured workers’ compensation liabilities, general and auto insurance liabilities, reserves for inventory markdowns, calculation of asset impairment, shrink accrual and tax contingency reserves.

     Restatement of Prior Financial Information: The Company historically straight-lined lease expense over the period from the open date of the store through the initial non-cancelable lease term expiration. However, in accordance with FASB issued Statement No. 13 (“SFAS 13”),“Accounting for leases,” as amended, FASB issued Technical Bulletin No. 88-1 (“FTB 88-1”), “Issues Relating to Accounting for Leases”, and FASB issued Technical Bulletin No. 85-3 (“FTB 85-3”),“Accounting for Operating Leases with Scheduled Rent Increases”, the Company corrected its lease accounting practices to recognize lease expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term which begins on the date we obtain control of the property and includes any renewal periods for which failure to renew imposes a penalty on the lessee such that renewal is determined to be reasonably assured. Likewise, the Company corrected its practices to amortize landlord allowances on a straight-line basis over the lease term. These corrections to our lease accounting practices reduced net income by $484,000 and diluted earnings per share by $0.02 in fiscal 2004. The corrections decreased net income by $775,000 or $0.03 diluted share in fiscal year 2003 and by $366,000 or $0.02 per diluted share in fiscal 2002.

      In connection with this restatement of prior financial statements, the Company recorded certain adjustments in prior periods in order to conform its accounting for the capitalization of inbound freight on domestic purchases and certain discounts from vendors to the Company’s current practices. Historically, the Company fully expensed inbound freight and domestic purchases and certain discounts from vendors through cost of goods sold. These adjustments had the effect of increasing net income by $400,000 or $0.01 per diluted share in fiscal 2003 and decreasing net income by $22,000 in fiscal 2002.

      The Company restated its consolidated balance sheet at January 31, 2004 and its consolidated statements of income, cash flows and stockholders’ equity for the years ended January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003. The Company also restated its quarterly financial information for fiscal 2003 and the first three quarters of fiscal 2004, as disclosed in Note 13. The restatement also affects periods prior to fiscal 2002. The impact of the restatement on such prior periods has been reflected as an adjustment of $7.3 million to retained earnings as of February 2, 2002 in the consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity.

      All referenced amounts for prior periods in these financial statements and the notes thereto reflect the balances and amounts on a restated basis.

     Cash and Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments:Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. Investments with original maturities beyond three months are classified as short-term investments. The fair values of short-term investments are based on quoted market prices.

     Concentration of Credit Risk: Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk principally consist of cash equivalents and accounts receivable. The Company places its cash equivalents with high credit qualified institutions and, by practice, limits the amount of credit exposure to any one institution. Concentrations of credit risks with respect to accounts receivable are limited due to the dispersion across different geographies of the Company’s customer base.

     Supplemental Cash Flow Information: Income tax payments, net of refunds received, for the fiscal years ended January 29, 2005, January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003 were $18,454,000, $12,643,000 and $21,982,000, respectively. Cash paid for interest for the fiscal years ended January 29, 2005, January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003 were $610,000, $306,400 and $21,000, respectively.

     Inventories: Merchandise inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market as determined by the retail method.

     Property and Equipment: Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred; renewals and betterments are capitalized. The Company accounts for its software development costs in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position (“SOP”) 98-1, “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use”. Depreciation is provided on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets excluding leasehold improvements. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the estimated useful life or lease term. Typical estimated useful lives are as follows:

      The Company primarily invests in property and equipment in connection with the opening and remodeling of stores and in computer software and hardware. Most of the Company’s store leases give the Company the option to terminate the lease if certain specified sales volumes are not achieved during the first few years of the lease. The Company periodically reviews its store locations and estimates the recoverability of its assets, recording an impairment charge, if necessary, when the Company decides to close the store or otherwise determines that future undiscounted cash flows associated with those assets will not be sufficient to recover the carrying value. This determination is based on a number of factors, including the store’s historical operating results and cash flows, estimated future sales growth, real estate development in the area and perceived local market conditions that can be difficult to predict and may be subject to change. In addition, the Company regularly evaluates its computer-related and other long-lived assets and may accelerate depreciation over the revised useful life if the asset is expected to be replaced or has limited future value.

      The Company recognizes sales at the point of purchase when the customer takes possession of the merchandise and pays for the purchase, generally with cash or credit. Sales from purchases made with Cato credit, gift cards and layaway sales are also recorded when the customer takes possession of the merchandise. Gift cards, layaway deposits and merchandise credits granted to customers are recorded as deferred revenue until they are redeemed or forfeited. A provision is made for estimated product returns based on sales volumes and the Company’s experience; actual returns have not varied materially from amounts provided historically.

      Credit revenue on the Company’s private label credit card portfolio is recognized as earned under the interest method. Late fees are recognized as earned, less provisions for estimated uncollectible fees.

     Cost of Goods Sold: Cost of goods sold includes merchandise costs, net of discounts and allowances, buying costs, distribution costs, occupancy costs, freight, and inventory shrinkage. Net merchandise costs and in-bound freight are capitalized as inventory costs. Buying and distribution costs include payroll, payroll-related costs and operating expenses for our buying departments and distribution center. Occupancy expenses include rent, real estate taxes, insurance, common area maintenance, utilities and maintenance for stores and distribution facilities. Buying, distribution, occupancy and internal transfer costs are treated as period costs and are not capitalized as part of inventory.

     Credit Sales: The Company offers its own credit card to customers. All credit activity is performed by the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries. None of the credit card receivables are secured. Finance income is recognized as earned under the interest method and late charges are recognized in the month in which they are assessed, net of provisions for estimated uncollectible amounts. The Company evaluates the collectibility of accounts receivable and records an allowance for doubtful accounts based on estimates of actual write-offs and the accounts receivable.

     Advertising: Advertising costs are expensed in the period in which they are incurred. Advertising expense was $5,504,000, $5,638,000 and $5,299,000 for the fiscal years ended January 29, 2005, January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003, respectively.

     Earnings Per Share: FASB No. 128 requires dual presentation of basic EPS and diluted EPS on the face of all income statements for all entities with complex capital structures. Basic EPS is computed as net income divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock options, warrants and other convertible securities. Unvested restricted stock is included in the computation of diluted EPS using the treasury stock method for fiscal 2004 and 2003, and had no impact on fiscal 2002. The weighted-average number of shares used in the basic earnings per share computations was 20,584,262, 23,140,581, and 25,465,543 for the fiscal years ended January 29, 2005, January 31, 2004, and February 1, 2003, respectively. The weighted-average number of shares representing the dilutive effect of stock options was 401,112, 418,960 and 481,914 for the fiscal years ended January 29, 2005, January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003, respectively. The weighted-average number of shares used in the diluted earnings per share computations was 20,985,374, 23,559,541, and 25,947,457 for the fiscal years ended January 29, 2005, January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003, respectively. There were an immaterial number of shares withheld in the computation of diluted earnings per share due to potential anti-dilutive effects for the fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002.

     Vendor Allowances: The Company receives certain allowances from vendors primarily related to purchase discounts and markdown and damage allowances. All allowances are reflected in cost of goods sold

      In January 2003, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) issued EITF 02-16, “Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor.” Under this EITF, cash consideration received from a vendor is presumed to be a reduction of the purchase cost of merchandise and should be reflected as a reduction of cost of sales or revenue unless it can be demonstrated this consideration offsets an incremental expense, in which case it can be netted against that expense. The adoption of EITF 02-16 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations for fiscal year ended January 29, 2005 or January 31, 2004.

     Income Taxes: The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return. Income taxes are provided based on the asset and liability method of accounting, whereby deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities.

     Store Opening and Closing Costs: Costs relating to the opening of new stores or the relocating or expanding of existing stores are expensed as incurred. A portion of construction, design, and site selection costs are capitalized to new, relocated and remodeled stores.

     Closed Store Lease Obligations: At the time stores are closed, provisions are made for the rentals required to be paid over the remaining lease terms, reduced by expected sublease rentals.

     Insurance: The Company is self-insured with respect to employee healthcare, workers’ compensation and general liability. The Company’s self-insurance liabilities are based on the total estimated cost of claims filed and estimates of claims incurred but not reported, less amounts paid against such claims, and are not discounted. Management reviews current and historical claims data in developing its estimates. The Company has stop-loss insurance coverage for individual claims in excess of $250,000 for employee healthcare, $350,000 for worker’s compensation and $200,000 for general liability. Employee health claims are funded through a VEBA trust to which the Company makes periodic contributions. Contributions to the VEBA trust were $11,205,000, $8,995,000 and $8,970,000 in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Accrued healthcare was $1,318,000 and $1,380,000 and assets held in VEBA trust were $731,000 and $924,000 at January 29, 2005 and January 31, 2004, respectively. The Company paid worker’s compensation and general liability claims of $3,227,000, $3,019,000 and $2,609,000 in fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Including claims incurred, but not yet paid, the Company recognized an expense of $3,513,000, $3,764,000 and $3,284,000 in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Accrued workers’ compensation and general liabilities was $4,254,000 and $3,968,000 at January 29, 2005 and January 31, 2004, respectively. The Company had no outstanding letters of credit relating to such claims at January 29, 2005 or at January 31, 2004.

     Fair Value of Financial Instruments: The Company’s carrying values of financial instruments, such as cash, cash equivalents, and debt, approximate their fair values due to their short terms to maturity and/or their variable interest rates.

     Stock-based Compensation: The Company applies APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, and related interpretations in accounting for its stock option plans. The exercise price for all options awarded under the Company’s Stock Option Plans has been equal to the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized for options granted under the Plans. Had compensation expense for fiscal 2004, 2003, and 2002 stock options granted been determined consistent with SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure”, the Company’s net income and basic and diluted earnings per

      The weighted-average fair value of each option granted during fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002 is estimated at $6.35, $5.84 and $8.29 per share, respectively. The fair value of each option grant is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions for grants issued in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively: expected dividend yield of 3.00%, 3.01% and 3.29%; expected volatility of 38.13%, 44.34% and 57.06%, adjusted for expected dividends; risk-free interest rate of 3.74%, 3.29% and 2.60%; and an expected life of 5 years for 2004, 2003 and 2002. The effects of applying SFAS 148 in this proforma disclosure are not indicative of future amounts.

      In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement No. 123R (“SFAS 123R”), “Share-Based Payment,” a revision of FASB issued Statement No. 123 (“SFAS 123”), “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” SFAS 123R requires the measurement of all stock-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options and stock purchase rights granted pursuant to certain employee stock purchase plans, using a fair-value based method and the recording of such expense in our consolidated statements of operations. The accounting provisions of SFAS 123R are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2005. Accordingly, we are required to adopt SFAS 123R in the first quarter of 2006. The pro forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS 123 will no longer be an alternative to financial statement recognition. See Note 1 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the pro forma net income and earnings per share amounts for fiscal 2002 through fiscal 2004, as if we had used a fair-value based method similar to the methods required under SFAS 123R to measure compensation expense for employee stock-based compensation awards. We are currently evaluating the provisions of SFAS 123R. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements. Based on our current projections, we expect the future expense to be recognized as a result of the adoption of SFAS 123R to be similar to the pro forma amounts disclosed for fiscal 2004 in the notes to our consolidated financial statements.

      In November 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 151 (“SFAS 151”), “Inventory Costs.”SFAS 151 amends the guidance in Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, “Inventory Pricing,” to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage).

     Reclassifications: Certain reclassifications have been made to the consolidated financial statements for prior fiscal years to conform with the current year presentation.

      The components of Interest and other income are shown below in gross amounts (in thousands):

      Short-Term investments at January 29, 2005 and January 31, 2004 include the following (in thousands):

      The accumulated unrealized losses in short-term investments at January 29, 2005 of $65,000, net of a deferred income tax benefit of $37,000 offset by the accumulated unrealized gains in equity investments of $136,000, net of a deferred income tax liability of $77,000 and the accumulated unrealized losses of January 31, 2004 of $148,000, net of a deferred income tax benefit of $84,000 offset by the accumulated unrealized gains in equity investments of $206,000 net of a deferred income tax liability of $117,000 are reflected in accumulated other comprehensive gains (losses) in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. All unrealized losses disclosed were in a loss position for less than 12 months.

      As reported in Note 2, the Company had realized losses of $253,000 in fiscal 2004, realized gains of $673,000 in fiscal 2003 and realized losses of $1,697,000 in fiscal 2002.

      The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities at January 29, 2005, by contractual maturity, are shown below (in thousands):

      Additionally, the Company had $1.8 million invested in privately managed investment funds at January 29, 2005 and $1.6 million at January 31, 2004, which are reported under other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

      Accounts receivable consist of the following (in thousands):