UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014
or
For the Transition Period from to
Commission File Number 001 – 32205
CBRE GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
400 South Hope Street, 25th Floor
Los Angeles, California
(Address of principal executive offices)
90071
(Zip Code)
(213) 613-3333
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and
former fiscal year if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x.
The number of shares of Class A common stock outstanding at July 31, 2014 was 332,117,706.
June 30, 2014
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (Unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (Unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (Unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2014 (Unaudited)
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A.
Item 6.
Signatures
2
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $45,878 and $40,262 at June 30, 2014 andDecember 31, 2013, respectively
Warehouse receivables
Trading securities
Income taxes receivable
Prepaid expenses
Deferred tax assets, net
Real estate and other assets held for sale
Real estate under development
Available for sale securities
Other current assets
Total Current Assets
Property and equipment, net
Goodwill
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $417,314 and $348,566 at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries
Real estate held for investment
Other assets, net
Total Assets
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Compensation and employee benefits payable
Accrued bonus and profit sharing
Income taxes payable
Short-term borrowings:
Warehouse lines of credit
Revolving credit facility
Other
Total short-term borrowings
Current maturities of long-term debt
Notes payable on real estate
Liabilities related to real estate and other assets held for sale
Other current liabilities
Total Current Liabilities
Long-Term Debt:
5.00% senior notes
Senior secured term loans
6.625% senior notes
Other long-term debt
Total Long-Term Debt
Deferred tax liabilities, net
Non-current tax liabilities
Pension liability
Other liabilities
Total Liabilities
Commitments and contingencies
Equity:
CBRE Group, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity:
Class A common stock; $0.01 par value; 525,000,000 shares authorized; 332,116,454 and 331,927,166 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively
Additional paid-in capital
Accumulated earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Total CBRE Group, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity
Non-controlling interests
Total Equity
Total Liabilities and Equity
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Revenue
Costs and expenses:
Cost of services
Operating, administrative and other
Depreciation and amortization
Total costs and expenses
Gain on disposition of real estate
Operating income
Equity income from unconsolidated subsidiaries
Other income
Interest income
Interest expense
Write-off of financing costs
Income from continuing operations before provision for income taxes
Provision for income taxes
Income from continuing operations
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
Net income
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests
Net income attributable to CBRE Group, Inc.
Basic income per share attributable to CBRE Group, Inc. shareholders
Income from continuing operations attributable to CBRE Group, Inc.
Income from discontinued operations attributable to CBRE Group, Inc.
Weighted average shares outstanding for basic income per share
Diluted income per share attributable to CBRE Group, Inc. shareholders
Weighted average shares outstanding for diluted income per share
Amounts attributable to CBRE Group, Inc. shareholders
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
4
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Dollars in thousands)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)
Unrealized (losses) gains on interest rate swaps and interest rate caps, net
Unrealized holding losses on available for sale securities, net
Other, net
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
Comprehensive income
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests
Comprehensive income attributable to CBRE Group, Inc.
5
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Amortization and write-off of financing costs
Amortization and write-off of debt discount
Gain on sale of loans, servicing rights and other assets
Net realized and unrealized gains from investments
Gain on disposition of real estate held for investment
Provision for doubtful accounts
Deferred income taxes
Compensation expense related to stock options and non-vested stock awards
Incremental tax benefit from stock options exercised
Distribution of earnings from unconsolidated subsidiaries
Tenant concessions received
Purchase of trading securities
Proceeds from sale of trading securities
Proceeds from securities sold, not yet purchased
Securities purchased to cover short sales
(Increase) decrease in receivables
Increase in prepaid expenses and other assets
Decrease in real estate held for sale and under development
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses
Decrease in compensation and employee benefits payable and accrued bonus and profit sharing
Increase in income taxes receivable/payable
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities
Other operating activities, net
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures
Acquisition of businesses, including net assets acquired, intangibles and goodwill, net of cash acquired
Contributions to unconsolidated subsidiaries
Distributions from unconsolidated subsidiaries
Net proceeds from disposition of real estate held for investment
Additions to real estate held for investment
Proceeds from the sale of servicing rights and other assets
Decrease in restricted cash
Purchase of available for sale securities
Proceeds from the sale of available for sale securities
Other investing activities, net
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from senior secured term loans
Repayment of senior secured term loans
Proceeds from revolving credit facility
Repayment of revolving credit facility
Proceeds from issuance of 5.00% senior notes
Repayment of 11.625% senior subordinated notes
Proceeds from notes payable on real estate held for investment
Repayment of notes payable on real estate held for investment
Proceeds from notes payable on real estate held for sale and under development
Repayment of notes payable on real estate held for sale and under development
Proceeds from short-term borrowings, net
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
Non-controlling interests contributions
Non-controlling interests distributions
Payment of financing costs
Other financing activities, net
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
Effect of currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, AT END OF PERIOD
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest
Income tax payments, net
6
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY
Balance at December 31, 2013
Stock options exercised (including tax benefit)
Compensation expense for stock options and non-vested stock awards
Foreign currency translation gain
Unrealized losses on interest rate swaps and interest rate caps, net
Contributions from non-controlling interests
Distributions to non-controlling interests
Balance at June 30, 2014
7
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of CBRE Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (which may be referred to in these financial statements as the “company”, “we”, “us” and “our”), have been prepared in accordance with the rules applicable to Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and include all information and footnotes required for interim financial statement presentation, but do not include all disclosures required under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) for annual financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments, except as otherwise noted) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events. These estimates and the underlying assumptions affect the amounts of assets and liabilities reported, and reported amounts of revenue and expenses. Such estimates include the value of goodwill, intangibles and other long-lived assets, real estate assets, accounts receivable, investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and assumptions used in the calculation of income taxes, retirement and other post-employment benefits, among others. These estimates and assumptions are based on management’s best judgment. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors, including consideration of the current economic environment, and adjusts such estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from these estimates. Changes in these estimates resulting from continuing changes in the economic environment will be reflected in the financial statements in future periods. Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2013 financial statements to conform with the 2014 presentation.
The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2014. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, which contains the latest available audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, which are as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013.
2. New Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” This ASU requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP when it becomes effective on January 1, 2017. This ASU permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. Early adoption is not permitted. We are evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. We have not yet selected a transition method nor have we determined the effect of this ASU on our ongoing financial reporting.
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period.” This ASU requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period should be treated as a performance condition. The performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. ASU 2014-12 is effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual
8
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
periods beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. We elected to early adopt this ASU retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that were outstanding as of January 1, 2013 and to all new or modified awards thereafter. Given that we only began granting performance-based stock awards in the latter part of 2013, the adoption of this update did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
3. Norland Acquisition
On December 23, 2013, we acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of London-based Norland Managed Services, Ltd (Norland), which fortified our real estate outsourcing platform in Europe within our EMEA segment (Norland Acquisition). Norland is a premier provider of building technical engineering services that enables us to self-perform these services in Europe and adds to our expertise in the highly specialized critical environments market. The purchase price for the Norland Acquisition was approximately $474 million, with $433.9 million paid at closing and the remaining contingent consideration paid in July 2014. The Norland Acquisition was financed with cash on hand and borrowings under our revolving credit facility. On December 23, 2013, we also issued an aggregate of 362,916 shares of non-vested Class A common stock to certain members of senior management of Norland in connection with this acquisition.
The acquisition agreement provided for a contingent payment of up to 50 million British pounds sterling if certain performance criteria were met post-acquisition. In measuring the fair value of the contingent consideration at acquisition date, we assigned probabilities of achievement to the performance criteria, based on the nature of the performance criteria and our due diligence performed at the time of the acquisition. The fair value of this contingent consideration at acquisition date was based on the weighted probability of achievement of a certain earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) level for the twelve months ended March 31, 2014, which ranged from 22.1 million to 35.0 million British pounds sterling. We valued this contingent payment at 25.5 million British pounds sterling (or $41.8 million) at acquisition date, which was recorded within accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the contingent payment was trued up to 24.4 million British pounds sterling (or $40.0 million) based upon the EBITDA achieved for the twelve months ended March 31, 2014. The reduction of approximately $1.8 million from what was initially recorded at acquisition date was reflected in earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2014 in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The finalized contingent consideration due of 24.4 million British pounds sterling (approximately $40.0 million) was included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2014 and was paid in July 2014. No further amounts are due under the Norland Acquisition agreement.
The purchase accounting for the Norland Acquisition has been finalized. The excess purchase price over the estimated fair value of net assets acquired has been recorded to goodwill. The goodwill arising from the Norland Acquisition consists largely of the synergies and economies of scale expected from combining the operations acquired from Norland with ours. No goodwill recorded in connection with the Norland Acquisition is deductible for tax purposes.
Unaudited pro forma results, assuming the Norland Acquisition had occurred as of January 1, 2013 for purposes of the 2013 pro forma disclosures, are presented below. They include certain adjustments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, including $9.9 million and $20.9 million, respectively, of increased amortization expense as a result of intangible assets acquired in the Norland Acquisition, $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of additional interest expense as a result of debt incurred to finance the Norland Acquisition, and the tax impact of the pro forma adjustments. These unaudited pro forma results have been
9
prepared for comparative purposes only and do not purport to be indicative of what operating results would have been had the Norland Acquisition occurred on January 1, 2013 and may not be indicative of future operating results (dollars in thousands, except share data):
Basic income per share
Diluted income per share
4. Variable Interest Entities (VIEs)
A consolidated subsidiary (the Venture) in our Global Investment Management segment sponsored investments by third-party investors in certain commercial properties through the formation of tenant-in-common limited liability companies and Delaware Statutory Trusts (collectively referred to as the Entities) that were owned by the third-party investors. The Venture also formed and was a member of a limited liability company for each property that served as master tenant (Master Tenant). Each Master Tenant leased the property from the Entities through a master lease agreement. Pursuant to the master lease agreements, the Master Tenant had the power to direct the day-to-day asset management activities that most significantly impacted the economic performance of the Entities. As a result, the Entities were deemed to be VIEs since the third-party investors holding the equity investment at risk in the Entities did not direct the day-to-day activities that most significantly impacted the economic performance of the properties held by the Entities. The Venture made voluntary contributions to each of these properties to support their operations beyond the cash flow generated by the properties themselves. As of the most recent reconsideration date, such financial support was significant enough that the Venture was deemed to be the primary beneficiary of each Entity.
No financial support was provided by the Venture to the Entities during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. The assets of the Entities were the sole collateral for the mortgage notes payable and other liabilities of the Entities and as such, the creditors and equity investors of these Entities had no recourse to our assets held outside of these Entities.
During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the remaining two commercial properties were sold. As of June 30, 2014, we no longer hold interests in VIEs in which we are the primary beneficiary. Investments in real estate of $39.9 million and nonrecourse mortgage notes payable of $41.7 million ($0.9 million of which is current) were included in real estate assets held for sale or investment and notes payable on real estate, respectively, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2013. In addition, a non-controlling deficit of $1.8 million in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2013 was attributable to the Entities.
On January 1, 2014, we adopted ASU 2014-08, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals
10
of Components of an Entity” and as a result, we no longer report discontinued operations in the ordinary course of our business. Prior to January 1, 2014, in the ordinary course of business, if we disposed of real estate assets, or held real estate assets for sale, that were considered components of an entity in accordance with Topic 360, and if we did not have, or expect to have, significant continuing involvement with the operation of these real estate assets after disposition, we were required to recognize operating profits or losses and gains or losses on disposition of these assets as discontinued operations in our consolidated statements of operations in the periods in which they occurred.
Operating results relating to the Entities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 include the following (dollars in thousands):
Operating, administrative and other expenses
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests
We hold variable interests in certain VIEs in our Global Investment Management and Development Services segments which are not consolidated as it was determined that we are not the primary beneficiary. Our involvement with these entities is in the form of equity co-investments and fee arrangements.
As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, our maximum exposure to loss related to the VIEs which are not consolidated was as follows (dollars in thousands):
Other assets, current
Co-investment commitments
Maximum exposure to loss
5. Fair Value Measurements
The “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Topic 820) defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Topic 820 also establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
11
Level 2 – Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.
There were no significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.
The following tables present the fair value of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands):
Assets
Available for sale securities:
U.S. treasury securities
Debt securities issued by U.S. federal agencies
Corporate debt securities
Asset-backed securities
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Total debt securities
Equity securities
Total available for sale securities
Foreign currency exchange forward contracts
Total assets at fair value
Liabilities
Interest rate swaps
Total liabilities at fair value
12
Fair value measurements for our available for sale securities are obtained from independent pricing services which utilize observable market data that may include quoted market prices, dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. treasury yield curve, trading levels, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the instrument’s terms and conditions.
The trading securities are primarily in the U.S. and are generally valued at the last reported sales price on the day of valuation or, if no sales occurred on the valuation date, at the mean of the bid and asked prices on such date.
The fair values of the warehouse receivables are calculated based on already locked in security buy prices. At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, all of the warehouse receivables included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets were either under commitment to be purchased by Freddie Mac or had confirmed forward trade commitments for the issuance and purchase of Fannie Mae or Ginnie Mae mortgage backed securities that will be secured by the underlying loans. These assets are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy as all inputs are readily observable.
The valuation of interest rate swaps and foreign currency exchange forward contracts is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate and foreign currency exchange forward curves. The fair values of interest rate swaps and foreign currency exchange forward contracts are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future estimated cash payments/receipts. The estimated cash flows are based on an expectation of future interest rates or foreign currency exchange rates using forward curves derived from observable market interest rate and foreign currency exchange forward curves. To comply
13
with the provisions of Topic 820, we incorporate credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both our own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of our derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, we have considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees. In conjunction with our adoption of ASU 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs,” we made an accounting policy election to measure the credit risk of our derivative financial instruments that are subject to master netting agreements on a net basis by counterparty portfolio. Although we have determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with our derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by us and our counterparties. However, as of June 30, 2014, we have determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of our derivatives. As a result, our derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
There were no significant non-recurring fair value measurements recorded during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.
FASB ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments” requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Our financial instruments are as follows:
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash: These balances include cash and cash equivalents as well as restricted cash with maturities of less than three months. The carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.
Receivables, less Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: Due to their short-term nature, fair value approximates carrying value.
Warehouse Receivables: These balances are carried at fair value based on market prices at the balance sheet date.
Trading and Available for Sale Securities: These investments are carried at their fair value.
Foreign Currency Exchange Forward Contracts: These assets and liabilities are carried at their fair value as calculated by using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative (see Note 6).
Short-Term Borrowings: The majority of this balance represents our warehouse lines of credit for CBRE Capital Markets, Inc. (CBRE Capital Markets) and our revolving credit facility outstanding. Due to the short-term nature and variable interest rates of these instruments, fair value approximates carrying value.
Senior Secured Term Loans: Based upon information from third-party banks (which falls within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy), the estimated fair value of our senior secured term loans was approximately $666.0 million and $687.6 million at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. Their actual carrying value totaled $665.4 million and $685.3 million at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively (see Note 11).
Interest Rate Swaps: These liabilities are carried at their fair value as calculated by using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative (see Note 6).
14
5.00% Senior Notes: Based on dealers’ quotes (which falls within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy), the estimated fair value of our 5.00% senior notes was $810.0 million and $769.4 million at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. Their actual carrying value totaled $800.0 million at both June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
6.625% Senior Notes: Based on dealers’ quotes (which falls within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy), the estimated fair value of our 6.625% senior notes was $372.3 million and $372.8 million at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. Their actual carrying value totaled $350.0 million at both June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
Notes Payable on Real Estate: As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the carrying value of our notes payable on real estate was $89.8 million and $130.5 million, respectively (see Note 10). These borrowings generally have floating interest rates at spreads over a market rate index. It is likely that some portion of our notes payable on real estate have fair values lower than actual carrying values. Given our volume of notes payable and the cost involved in estimating their fair value, we determined it was not practicable to do so. Additionally, only $4.0 million of these notes payable were recourse to us as of both June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
6. Derivative Financial Instruments
We are exposed to certain risks arising from both our business operations and economic conditions. We manage economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of our debt funding and by using derivative financial instruments. Specifically, we enter into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the payment of future known but uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. Our derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of our known or expected cash payments principally related to our borrowings. We do not net derivatives on our balance sheet. Our objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, we primarily use interest rate swaps as part of our interest rate risk management strategy. Additionally, certain of our foreign operations expose us to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. These fluctuations may impact the value of our cash receipts and payments in terms of our functional currency. We enter into derivative financial instruments to protect the value or fix the amount of certain obligations in terms of our reporting currency, the U.S. dollar.
In March 2011, we entered into five interest rate swap agreements, all with effective dates in October 2011, and immediately designated them as cash flow hedges in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” The purpose of these interest rate swap agreements is to attempt to hedge potential changes to our cash flows due to the variable interest nature of our senior secured term loan facilities. The total notional amount of these interest rate swap agreements is $400.0 million, with $200.0 million expiring in October 2017 and $200.0 million expiring in September 2019. There was no significant hedge ineffectiveness for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. We recorded net losses of $1.7 million and $1.3 million, respectively, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and net gains of $12.8 million and $15.1 million, respectively, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 to other comprehensive income/loss in relation to such interest rate swap agreements. As of June 30, 2014, we estimate that $11.8 million will be reclassified to interest expense during the next twelve months. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the fair values of such interest rate swap agreements were reflected as a $30.3 million liability and a $29.0 million liability, respectively, and were included in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
15
In March 2014, we began a foreign currency exchange forward hedging program by entering into 38 foreign currency exchange forward contracts, including agreements to buy U.S. dollars and sell Australian dollars, Canadian dollars, Japanese yen, Euros, and British pound sterling covering a notional amount of $209.7 million. The purpose of these forward contracts is to attempt to mitigate the risk of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates that would adversely impact our foreign currency denominated EBITDA. Hedge accounting was not elected for any of these contracts. As such, changes in the fair values of these contracts are recorded directly in earnings. Included in the consolidated statement of operations were net losses of $3.4 million for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, resulting from net losses on foreign currency exchange forward contracts. As of June 30, 2014, we had 22 foreign currency exchange forward contracts outstanding covering a notional amount of $155.5 million. As of June 30, 2014, the fair value of forward contracts with one counterparty aggregated to a $0.7 million asset position, which was included in other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. As of June 30, 2014, the fair value of forward contracts with four counterparties aggregated to a $3.5 million liability position, which was included in other current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
7. Investments in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Combined condensed financial information for these entities is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Global Investment Management:
Operating loss
Net (loss) income
Development Services:
Operating income (loss)
Other:
Total:
Our Global Investment Management segment involves investing our own capital in certain real estate investments with clients. We have provided investment management, property management, brokerage and other professional services in connection with these real estate investments on an arm’s length basis and earned revenues from these unconsolidated subsidiaries. We have also provided development, property management and brokerage services to certain of our unconsolidated subsidiaries in our Development Services segment on an arm’s length basis and earned revenues from these unconsolidated subsidiaries.
16
8. Real Estate and Other Assets Held for Sale and Related Liabilities
Real estate and other assets held for sale include completed real estate projects or land for sale in their present condition that have met all of the “held for sale” criteria of the “Property, Plant and Equipment” Topic of the FASB ASC (Topic 360) and other assets directly related to such projects. Liabilities related to real estate and other assets held for sale have been included as a single line item in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
There were no real estate assets classified as “held for sale” at December 31, 2013. Real estate and other assets held for sale and related liabilities were as follows at June 30, 2014 (dollars in thousands):
Assets:
Real estate held for sale (see Note 9)
Other assets
Total real estate and other assets held for sale
Liabilities:
Notes payable on real estate held for sale (see Note 10)
Total liabilities related to real estate and other assets held for sale
Net real estate and other assets held for sale
9. Real Estate
We provide build-to-suit services for our clients and also develop or purchase certain projects which we intend to sell to institutional investors upon project completion or redevelopment. Therefore, we have ownership of real estate until such projects are sold or otherwise disposed. Certain real estate assets secure the outstanding balances of underlying mortgage or construction loans. Our real estate is reported in our Development Services and Global Investment Management segments and consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
Real estate included in assets held for sale (see Note 8)
Real estate under development (current)
Real estate under development (non-current)
Real estate held for investment (1)
Total real estate (2)
Includes lease intangibles of $5.1 million at June 30, 2014 and lease intangibles and tenant origination costs of $5.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively, at December 31, 2013. We record lease intangibles and tenant
17
10. Notes Payable on Real Estate
We had loans secured by real estate, which consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
Current portion of notes payable on real estate
Notes payable on real estate included in liabilities related to real estate and other assets held for sale (see Note 8)
Total notes payable on real estate, current portion
Notes payable on real estate, non-current portion
Total notes payable on real estate
At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, $0.1 million and $1.5 million, respectively, of the current portion of notes payable on real estate and $3.9 million and $2.5 million, respectively, of the non-current portion of notes payable on real estate were recourse to us, beyond being recourse to the single-purpose entity that held the real estate asset and was the primary obligor on the note payable.
11. Debt
Since 2001, we have maintained credit facilities with Credit Suisse Group AG (CS) and other lenders to fund strategic acquisitions and to provide for our working capital needs. On March 28, 2013, we entered into a new credit agreement (the Credit Agreement) with a syndicate of banks led by CS, as administrative and collateral agent, to completely refinance our previous credit agreement. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, we completed a series of financing transactions, which included the repayment of $1.6 billion of our senior secured term loans under our previous credit agreement.
As of June 30, 2014, our Credit Agreement provides for the following: (1) a $1.2 billion revolving credit facility, including revolving credit loans, letters of credit and a swingline loan facility, maturing on March 28, 2018; (2) a $500.0 million tranche A term loan facility (of which $300.0 million was on an optional delayed-draw basis for up to 120 days from March 28, 2013, which we drew down in June 2013 to partially fund the redemption of our 11.625% senior subordinated notes) requiring quarterly principal payments, which began on June 30, 2013 and continue through maturity on March 28, 2018; and (3) a $215.0 million tranche B term loan facility requiring quarterly principal payments, which began on June 30, 2013 and continue through December 31, 2020, with the balance payable at maturity on March 28, 2021.
The revolving credit facility allows for borrowings outside of the U.S., with a $10.0 million sub-facility available to one of our Canadian subsidiaries, a $35.0 million sub-facility available to one of our Australian subsidiaries and one of our New Zealand subsidiaries and a $150.0 million sub-facility available to one of our U.K. subsidiaries. Additionally, outstanding borrowings under these sub-facilities may be up to 5.0% higher as allowed under the currency fluctuation provision in the Credit Agreement. Borrowings under the revolving credit
18
facility bear interest at varying rates, based at our option, on either the applicable fixed rate plus 1.15% to 2.25% or the daily rate plus 0.125% to 1.25% as determined by reference to our ratio of total debt less available cash to EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement). As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had $336.0 million and $142.5 million, respectively, of revolving credit facility principal outstanding with related weighted average interest rates of 2.7% and 2.2%, respectively, which are included in short-term borrowings in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. As of June 30, 2014, letters of credit totaling $11.4 million were outstanding under the revolving credit facility. These letters of credit were primarily issued in the normal course of business as well as in connection with certain insurance programs and reduce the amount we may borrow under the revolving credit facility.
Borrowings under the term loan facilities as of June 30, 2014 bear interest, based at our option, on the following: for the tranche A term loan facility, on either the applicable fixed rate plus 1.50% to 2.75% or the daily rate plus 0.50% to 1.75%, as determined by reference to our ratio of total debt less available cash to EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement) and for the tranche B term loan facility, on either the applicable fixed rate plus 2.75% or the daily rate plus 1.75%. As of June 30, 2014, we had $665.4 million of term loan facilities principal outstanding (consisting of $453.1 million of tranche A term loan facility and $212.3 million of tranche B term loan facility), which are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2013, we had $685.3 million of term loan facilities principal outstanding (consisting of $471.9 million of tranche A term loan facility and $213.4 million of tranche B term loan facility), which are also included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
The Credit Agreement is jointly and severally guaranteed by us and substantially all of our domestic subsidiaries. Borrowings under our Credit Agreement are secured by a pledge of substantially all of the capital stock of our U.S. subsidiaries and 65.0% of the capital stock of certain non-U.S. subsidiaries. Also, the Credit Agreement requires us to pay a fee based on the total amount (whether used or unused) of the revolving credit facility commitment.
On March 14, 2013, CBRE Services, Inc. (CBRE) issued $800.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.00% senior notes due March 15, 2023. The 5.00% senior notes are unsecured obligations of CBRE, senior to all of its current and future subordinated indebtedness, but effectively subordinated to all of its current and future secured indebtedness. The 5.00% senior notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior basis by us and each domestic subsidiary of CBRE that guarantees our Credit Agreement. Interest accrues at a rate of 5.00% per year and is payable semi-annually in arrears on March 15 and September 15, beginning on September 15, 2013. The 5.00% senior notes are redeemable at our option, in whole or in part, on or after March 15, 2018 at a redemption price of 102.5% of the principal amount on that date and at declining prices thereafter. At any time prior to March 15, 2016, we may redeem up to 35.0% of the original principal amount of the 5.00% senior notes using the net cash proceeds from certain public offerings. In addition, at any time prior to March 15, 2018, the 5.00% senior notes may be redeemed by us, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100.0% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption, and an applicable premium (as defined in the indenture governing these notes), which is based on the excess of the present value of the March 15, 2018 redemption price plus all remaining interest payments through March 15, 2018, over the principal amount of the 5.00% senior notes on such redemption date. If a change of control triggering event (as defined in the indenture governing these notes) occurs, we are obligated to make an offer to purchase the then outstanding 5.00% senior notes at a redemption price of 101.0% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. The amount of the 5.00% senior notes included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets was $800.0 million at both June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
19
Our Credit Agreement and the indentures governing our 5.00% senior notes and 6.625% senior notes contain numerous restrictive covenants that, among other things, limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends or make distributions to stockholders, repurchase capital stock or debt, make investments, sell assets or subsidiary stock, create or permit liens on assets, engage in transactions with affiliates, enter into sale/leaseback transactions, issue subsidiary equity and enter into consolidations or mergers. Our Credit Agreement also currently requires us to maintain a minimum coverage ratio of EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement) to total interest expense of 2.00x and a maximum leverage ratio of total debt less available cash to EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of 4.25x. Our coverage ratio of EBITDA to total interest expense was 11.61x for the trailing twelve months ended June 30, 2014 and our leverage ratio of total debt less available cash to EBITDA was 1.66x as of June 30, 2014.
On June 18, 2009, CBRE issued $450.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 11.625% senior subordinated notes due June 15, 2017 for approximately $435.9 million, net of discount. The 11.625% senior subordinated notes were unsecured senior subordinated obligations of CBRE and were jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior subordinated basis by us and our domestic subsidiaries that guarantee our Credit Agreement. Interest accrued at a rate of 11.625% per year and was payable semi-annually in arrears on June 15 and December 15. As permitted by the indenture governing these notes, on June 15, 2013, we redeemed all of the 11.625% senior subordinated notes. In connection with this early redemption, we paid a premium of $26.2 million and wrote off $16.1 million of unamortized deferred financing costs and unamortized discount.
12. Commitments and Contingencies
We are a party to a number of pending or threatened lawsuits arising out of, or incident to, our ordinary course of business. Our management believes that any losses in excess of the amounts accrued arising from such lawsuits are unlikely to be significant, but that litigation is inherently uncertain and there is the potential for a material adverse effect on our financial statements if one or more matters are resolved in a particular period in an amount materially in excess of that anticipated by management.
We had outstanding letters of credit totaling $27.1 million as of June 30, 2014, excluding letters of credit for which we have outstanding liabilities already accrued on our consolidated balance sheet related to our subsidiaries’ outstanding reserves for claims under certain insurance programs as well as letters of credit related to operating leases. These letters of credit are primarily executed by us in the ordinary course of business and expire at varying dates through June 2015.
We had guarantees totaling $14.1 million as of June 30, 2014, excluding guarantees related to pension liabilities, consolidated indebtedness and other obligations for which we have outstanding liabilities already accrued on our consolidated balance sheet, and operating leases. The $14.1 million mainly represents guarantees of obligations of unconsolidated subsidiaries, which expire at varying dates through June 2017, as well as various guarantees of management contracts in our operations overseas, which expire at the end of each of the respective agreements. The remainder of the guarantees consist of guarantees related to our defined benefit pension plans in the United Kingdom (U.K.) (in excess of our outstanding pension liability of $69.1 million as of June 30, 2014), which are continuous guarantees that will not expire until all amounts have been paid out for our pension liabilities.
In addition, as of June 30, 2014, we had numerous completion and budget guarantees relating to development projects. These guarantees are made by us in the ordinary course of our Development Services business. Each of these guarantees requires us to complete construction of the relevant project within a specified timeframe and/or within a specified budget, with us potentially being liable for costs to complete in excess of
20
such timeframe or budget. However, we generally have “guaranteed maximum price” contracts with reputable general contractors with respect to projects for which we provide these guarantees. These contracts are intended to pass the risk to such contractors. While there can be no assurance, we do not expect to incur any material losses under these guarantees.
In January 2008, CBRE Multifamily Capital, Inc. (CBRE MCI), a wholly-owned subsidiary of CBRE Capital Markets, entered into an agreement with Fannie Mae, under Fannie Mae’s DUS Lender Program (DUS Program), to provide financing for multifamily housing with five or more units. Under the DUS Program, CBRE MCI originates, underwrites, closes and services loans without prior approval by Fannie Mae, and in selected cases, is subject to sharing up to one-third of any losses on loans originated under the DUS Program. CBRE MCI has funded loans subject to such loss sharing arrangements with unpaid principal balances of $8.6 billion at June 30, 2014. Additionally, CBRE MCI has funded loans under the DUS Program that are not subject to loss sharing arrangements with unpaid principal balances of approximately $367.1 million at June 30, 2014. CBRE MCI, under its agreement with Fannie Mae, must post cash reserves under formulas established by Fannie Mae to provide for sufficient capital in the event losses occur. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, CBRE MCI had $22.1 million and $16.6 million, respectively, of cash deposited under this reserve arrangement, and had provided approximately $15.0 million and $13.8 million, respectively, of loan loss accruals. Fannie Mae’s recourse under the DUS Program is limited to the assets of CBRE MCI, which totaled approximately $374.0 million (including $225.2 million of warehouse receivables, a substantial majority of which are pledged against warehouse lines of credit and are therefore not available to Fannie Mae) at June 30, 2014.
An important part of the strategy for our Global Investment Management business involves investing our capital in certain real estate investments with our clients. These co-investments typically range from 2.0% to 5.0% of the equity in a particular fund. As of June 30, 2014, we had aggregate commitments of $22.9 million to fund future co-investments.
Additionally, an important part of our Development Services business strategy is to invest in unconsolidated real estate subsidiaries as a principal (in most cases co-investing with our clients). As of June 30, 2014, we had committed to fund $24.3 million of additional capital to these unconsolidated subsidiaries.
13. Income Per Share Information
The following is a calculation of income per share (dollars in thousands, except share data):
Computation of basic income per share attributable to CBRE Group, Inc. shareholders:
Net income attributable to CBRE Group, Inc. shareholders
21
Computation of diluted income per share attributable to CBRE Group, Inc. shareholders:
Dilutive effect of contingently issuable shares
Dilutive effect of stock options
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, 10,503 contingently issuable shares were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive effect.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, options to purchase 7,314 shares of common stock were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, options to purchase 55,587 shares of common stock were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share. These options were excluded because their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive effect given that the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of our common stock for each period.
14. Pensions
We have two contributory defined benefit pension plans in the U.K., which we acquired in connection with previous acquisitions. Our subsidiaries based in the U.K. maintain the plans to provide retirement benefits to existing and former employees participating in these plans. During 2007, we reached agreements with the active members of these plans to freeze future pension plan benefits. In return, the active members became eligible to enroll in the CBRE Group Personal Pension Plan, a defined contribution plan in the U.K.
Net periodic pension (benefit) cost consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
Interest cost
Expected return on plan assets
Amortization of unrecognized net loss
Net periodic pension (benefit) cost
We contributed $1.5 million and $3.1 million to fund our pension plans during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively. We expect to contribute a total of $6.3 million to fund our pension plans for the year ending December 31, 2014.
22
15. Discontinued Operations
As previously mentioned, on January 1, 2014, we adopted ASU 2014-08 and as a result, no longer anticipate reporting discontinued operations in the ordinary course of our business. Prior to January 1, 2014, in the ordinary course of business, if we disposed of real estate assets, or held real estate assets for sale, that were considered components of an entity in accordance with Topic 360, and if we did not have, or expect to have, significant continuing involvement with the operation of these real estate assets after disposition, we were required to recognize operating profits or losses and gains or losses on disposition of these assets as discontinued operations in our consolidated statements of operations in the periods in which they occurred. Real estate operations and dispositions accounted for as discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 were reported in our Global Investment Management and Development Services segments as follows (dollars in thousands):
Income from discontinued operations, before provision for income taxes
Less: Income from discontinued operations attributable to non-controlling interests
16. Segments
We report our operations through the following segments: (1) Americas, (2) EMEA, (3) Asia Pacific, (4) Global Investment Management and (5) Development Services.
The Americas segment is our largest segment of operations and provides a comprehensive range of services throughout the U.S. and in the largest regions of Canada and key markets in Latin America. The primary services offered consist of the following: real estate services, mortgage loan origination and servicing, valuation services, asset services and corporate services.
Our EMEA and Asia Pacific segments provide services similar to the Americas business segment. The EMEA segment has operations primarily in Europe, while the Asia Pacific segment has operations primarily in Asia, Australia and New Zealand.
23
Our Global Investment Management business provides investment management services to clients seeking to generate returns and diversification through direct and indirect investments in real estate in North America, Europe and Asia.
Our Development Services business consists of real estate development and investment activities primarily in the U.S.
Summarized financial information by segment is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Americas
EMEA
Asia Pacific
Global Investment Management
Development Services
EBITDA
EBITDA represents earnings before net interest expense, write-off of financing costs, income taxes, depreciation and amortization. Our management believes EBITDA is useful in evaluating our operating performance compared to that of other companies in our industry because the calculation of EBITDA generally eliminates the effects of financing and income taxes and the accounting effects of capital spending and acquisitions, which would include impairment charges of goodwill and intangibles created from acquisitions. Such items may vary for different companies for reasons unrelated to overall operating performance. As a result, our management uses EBITDA as a measure to evaluate the operating performance of our various business segments and for other discretionary purposes, including as a significant component when measuring our operating performance under our employee incentive programs. Additionally, we believe EBITDA is useful to investors to assist them in getting a more complete picture of our results of operations.
However, EBITDA is not a recognized measurement under GAAP and when analyzing our operating performance, readers should use EBITDA in addition to, and not as an alternative for, net income as determined in accordance with GAAP. Because not all companies use identical calculations, our presentation of EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. Furthermore, EBITDA is not intended to be a measure of free cash flow for our management’s discretionary use, as it does not consider certain cash
24
requirements such as tax and debt service payments. The amounts shown for EBITDA also differ from the amounts calculated under similarly titled definitions in our debt instruments, which are further adjusted to reflect certain other cash and non-cash charges and are used to determine compliance with financial covenants and our ability to engage in certain activities, such as incurring additional debt and making certain restricted payments.
Net interest expense and write-off of financing costs have been expensed in the segment incurred. Provision for income taxes has been allocated among our segments by using applicable U.S. and foreign effective tax rates. EBITDA for our segments is calculated as follows (dollars in thousands):
Add:
Interest (income) expense, net
Royalty and management service income
Net loss attributable to CBRE Group, Inc.
Interest expense (income), net
Royalty and management service (income) expense, net
Interest expense, net
Royalty and management service expense
25
Depreciation and amortization (1)
Interest expense, net (2)
EBITDA (3)
Net (loss) income attributable to CBRE Group, Inc.
Depreciation and amortization (4)
Interest expense, net (5)
Provision for income taxes (6)
EBITDA (7)
17. Guarantor and Nonguarantor Financial Statements
The following condensed consolidating financial information includes:
(1) Condensed consolidating balance sheets as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013; condensed consolidating statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013; condensed consolidating statements of comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013; and condensed consolidating statements of cash flows for the six months ended
26
June 30, 2014 and 2013, of (a) CBRE Group, Inc. as the parent, (b) CBRE as the subsidiary issuer, (c) the guarantor subsidiaries, (d) the nonguarantor subsidiaries and (e) CBRE Group, Inc. on a consolidated basis; and
(2) Elimination entries necessary to consolidate CBRE Group, Inc. as the parent, with CBRE and its guarantor and nonguarantor subsidiaries.
Investments in consolidated subsidiaries are presented using the equity method of accounting. The principal elimination entries eliminate investments in consolidated subsidiaries and intercompany balances and transactions.
27
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
AS OF JUNE 30, 2014
Receivables, net
Warehouse receivables (a)
Other intangible assets, net
Investments in consolidated subsidiaries
Intercompany loan receivable
Warehouse lines of credit (a)
Intercompany loan payable
CBRE Group, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity
28
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013
29
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014
Operating (loss) income
Royalty and management service (income) expense
Income from consolidated subsidiaries
Income before (benefit of) provision for income taxes
(Benefit of) provision for income taxes
30
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013
Equity income (loss) from unconsolidated subsidiaries
Other income (loss)
Income from continuing operations before (benefit of) provision for income taxes
31
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014
32
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013
Other (loss) income
33
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Unrealized losses on interest rate swaps, net
Total other comprehensive (loss) income
34
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Foreign currency translation loss
Unrealized gains (losses) on interest rate swaps and interest rate caps, net
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available for sale securities, net
Comprehensive income (loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to CBRE Group, Inc.
35
36
37
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
(Increase) decrease in intercompany receivables, net
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
38
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash
Proceeds from short-term borrowings
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
39
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for CBRE Group, Inc. for the three months ended June 30, 2014 represents an update to the more detailed and comprehensive disclosures included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. Accordingly, you should read the following discussion in conjunction with the information included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as well as the unaudited financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
In addition, the statements and assumptions in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, including, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies and prospects as well as estimates of industry growth for the third quarter and beyond. For important information regarding these forward-looking statements, please see the discussion below under the caption “Cautionary Note on Forward-Looking Statements.”
Overview
We are the world’s largest commercial real estate services and investment firm, based on 2013 revenue, with leading full-service operations in major metropolitan areas throughout the world. We offer a full range of services to occupiers, owners, lenders and investors in office, retail, industrial, multifamily and other types of commercial real estate. As of December 31, 2013, excluding independent affiliates, we operated in approximately 350 offices worldwide, with approximately 44,000 employees providing commercial real estate services under the “CBRE” brand name, investment management services under the “CBRE Global Investors” brand name and development services under the “Trammell Crow” brand name. Our business is focused on several competencies, including commercial property and corporate facilities management, tenant/occupier and property/agency leasing, property sales, real estate investment management, valuation, commercial mortgage origination and servicing, debt and structured finance solutions, development services and proprietary research. We generate revenue from management fees on a contractual and per-project basis, and from commissions on transactions. In 2014, we were the highest ranked commercial real estate services company among the Fortune Most Admired Companies, and we ranked seventh on the Barron’s 500, which measures companies on growth and financial performance. We have been the only commercial real estate services company included in the S&P 500 since 2006, and in the Fortune 500 since 2008. Additionally, the International Association of Outsourcing Professionals has included us among the top 100 global outsourcing companies across all industries for nine consecutive years. In 2014, we ranked as a top three outsourcing services provider globally and were the highest ranked commercial real estate services company in this survey.
When you read our financial statements and the information included in this Quarterly Report, you should consider that we have experienced, and continue to experience, several material trends and uncertainties that have affected our financial condition and results of operations that make it challenging to predict our future performance based on our historical results. We believe that the following material trends and uncertainties are crucial to an understanding of the variability in our historical earnings and cash flows and the potential for continued variability in the future:
Macroeconomic Conditions
Economic trends and government policies affect global and regional commercial real estate markets as well as our operations directly. These include: overall economic activity and employment growth, interest rate levels, the cost and availability of credit and the impact of tax and regulatory policies. Periods of economic weakness or recession, significantly rising interest rates, fiscal uncertainty, declining employment levels, decreasing demand for commercial real estate, falling real estate values, disruption to the global capital or credit markets, or the public perception that any of these events may occur, will negatively affect the performance of some of our business lines.
40
Compensation is our largest expense and the sales and leasing professionals in our advisory services business generally are paid on a commission and bonus basis that correlates with their revenue production. As a result, the negative effect of difficult market conditions on our operating margins is partially mitigated by the inherent variability of our compensation cost structure. In addition, when negative economic conditions are particularly severe, we have moved decisively to lower operating expenses to improve financial performance, and then have restored certain expenses as economic conditions improved. Adverse global and regional economic trends could be significant risks to the performance of our operations and our financial condition.
Since the financial crisis in 2008 and 2009, commercial real estate markets have gradually recovered in step with the slow improvement in global economic activity. The recovery has been most significant in the United States. Since 2010, gradually improving occupancy market conditions, including lower vacancy rates and higher rents, the availability of low-cost credit and better investor sentiment have sustained increased property sales activity. Leasing markets have been slower to recover but have shown signs of improved sentiment and higher activity in 2014.
European economies began to emerge from recession in 2013, with most countries returning to positive, though modest, economic growth. Reflecting the macro environment, investment sales across much of Europe were tepid until late 2012. Since then, sales activity has strengthened significantly. This trend has continued in 2014. However, leasing markets in much of Europe have remained soft in early 2014, as improved underlying economic conditions have yet to translate into increased demand for space or higher rents.
In Asia Pacific, leasing activity has been subdued since late 2011, as multi-national corporations headquartered in the region in particular, have been hesitant to expand in the region. On the other hand, investment markets have generally been stronger than leasing markets, although activity levels vary widely in individual countries within the region.
Real estate investment management and property development activity were adversely affected by the global financial crisis, which lowered property values and constrained financing and disposition opportunities. However, the macro environment for these businesses has generally improved as the real estate credit and investment sales markets have gradually recovered since 2010.
The further recovery of our global sales, leasing, investment management and development services operations depends on the continued improvement of market fundamentals, including sustained economic growth and strong job creation; stable, healthy global credit markets; and improved business and investor sentiment.
Effects of Acquisitions
Our management historically has made significant use of strategic acquisitions to add new service competencies, to increase our scale within existing competencies and to expand our presence in various geographic regions around the world. In December 2013, we fortified our real estate outsourcing platform in Europe within our EMEA segment with the acquisition of London-based Norland Managed Services, Ltd (Norland) for approximately $474 million (the Norland Acquisition). Norland is a premier provider of building technical engineering services that enables us to self-perform these services in Europe and adds to our expertise in the highly specialized critical environments market.
Strategic in-fill acquisitions have also played a key role in expanding our geographic coverage and broadening and strengthening our service offerings. The companies we acquired have generally been quality regional or specialty firms that complement our existing platform within a region, or affiliates in which, in some cases, we held a small equity interest. During 2013, we completed ten in-fill acquisitions, most notably a firm serving the London prime residential real estate market, a regional commercial real estate services firm based in San Francisco, a retail real estate services firm in the U.S. Mid-Atlantic region, a facility consulting and project
41
advisory firm based in Virginia serving the healthcare industry, and two property management specialist firms, one in the Czech Republic and Slovakia and one in Belgium. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we completed three in-fill acquisitions, including our former affiliate company in Thailand, a commercial real estate services firm based in South Carolina and a technical real estate consulting firm based in Germany. In the month of July 2014, we have also completed five additional acquisitions, three in the United States, including a commercial real estate service provider in Chicago, a hospitality/lodging industry consultant and our former affiliate in Louisville, and project management companies in Germany and Australia.
Although our management believes that strategic acquisitions can significantly decrease the cost, time and commitment of management resources necessary to attain a meaningful competitive position within targeted markets or to expand our presence within our current markets, in general, most acquisitions will initially have an adverse impact on our operating and net income, both as a result of transaction-related expenditures, which include severance, lease termination, transaction and deferred financing costs, among others, and the charges and costs of integrating the acquired business and its financial and accounting systems into our own. In addition, our acquisition structures often include deferred and/or contingent purchase price payments in future periods that are subject to the passage of time or achievement of certain performance metrics and other conditions. As of June 30, 2014, we have accrued for deferred consideration totaling $92.0 million, which was included in accounts payable and accrued expenses and in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
International Operations
As we increase our international operations through either acquisitions or organic growth, fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the other currencies in which we may generate earnings could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. Our Global Investment Management business has a significant amount of Euro-denominated assets under management, or AUM, as well as associated revenue and earnings in Europe, which have seen more pronounced movement in the value of the Euro against the U.S. dollar. Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates have resulted and may continue to result in corresponding fluctuations in our AUM, revenue and earnings.
Our management team generally seeks to mitigate our exposure by balancing assets and liabilities that are denominated in the same currency and by maintaining cash positions outside the United States only at levels necessary for operating purposes. Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates affect reported amounts of our total assets and liabilities, which are reflected in our financial statements as translated into U.S. dollars for each financial reporting period at the exchange rate in effect on the respective balance sheet dates, and our total revenue and expenses, which are reflected in our financial statements as translated into U.S. dollars for each financial reporting period at the monthly average exchange rate. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, foreign currency translation had a $13.1 million negative impact on our total revenue and a $14.1 million positive impact on our total cost of services and operating, administrative and other expenses. In addition, from time to time we enter into foreign currency exchange contracts to attempt to mitigate some of our exposure to exchange rate changes related to particular transactions and to hedge risks associated with the translation of foreign currencies into U.S. dollars.
42
During the six months ended June 30, 2014, approximately 45% of our business was transacted in local currencies of foreign countries, the majority of which includes the Australian dollar, the British pound sterling, the Canadian dollar, the Chinese yuan, the Euro, the Indian rupee, the Japanese yen and the Singapore dollar. Although we operate globally, we report our results in U.S. dollars. As a result, the strengthening or weakening of the U.S. dollar may positively or negatively impact our reported results. The following table sets forth our revenue derived from our most significant currencies (dollars in thousands):
United States dollar
British pound sterling
Euro
Australian dollar
Canadian dollar
Japanese yen
Indian rupee
Chinese yuan
Singapore dollar
Other currencies
Total revenue
We estimate that had the British pound sterling-to-U.S. dollar exchange rates been 10% higher during the six months ended June 30, 2014, the net impact would have been an increase in pre-tax income of $2.9 million. This hypothetical calculation estimates the impact of translating results into U.S. dollars and does not include an estimate of the impact a 10% change in the U.S. dollar against other currencies would have had on our foreign operations.
Due to the constantly changing currency exposures to which we are subject and the volatility of currency exchange rates, we cannot predict the effect of exchange rate fluctuations upon future operating results. In addition, fluctuations in currencies relative to the U.S. dollar may make it more difficult to perform period-to-period comparisons of our reported results of operations. Our international operations also are subject to, among other things, political instability and changing regulatory environments, which may adversely affect our future financial condition and results of operations. Our management routinely monitors these risks and related costs and evaluates the appropriate amount of resources to allocate towards business activities in foreign countries where such risks and costs are particularly significant.
Leverage
We are leveraged and have significant debt service obligations. As of June 30, 2014, our total debt—excluding our notes payable on real estate (which are generally nonrecourse to us) and warehouse lines of credit (which are recourse only to our wholly-owned subsidiary, CBRE Capital Markets, Inc., or CBRE Capital Markets, and are secured by our related warehouse receivables)— was approximately $2.2 billion.
Our level of indebtedness and the operating and financial restrictions in our debt agreements place some constraints on the operation of our business. Although our management believes that long-term indebtedness has been an important lever in the development of our business, including facilitating the acquisition of the majority of the real estate investment management business of Netherlands-based ING Group N.V. (the REIM Acquisitions) and the Norland Acquisition, the cash flow necessary to service this debt is not available for other general corporate purposes, which may limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and in the commercial real estate services industry. Our management seeks to mitigate this exposure both through the refinancing of debt when available on attractive terms and through selective repayment and retirement of indebtedness.
43
For example, during 2013, we completed a series of financing transactions that have meaningfully extended debt maturities, lowered annual interest expense by approximately $50 million when compared to annualized interest expense before these refinancing actions, and increased our financial flexibility. These transactions included the amendment and restatement of our credit agreement, which now provides for a $715.0 million term loan facility and an expanded $1.2 billion revolving credit facility (of which $336.0 million was drawn at June 30, 2014), the issuance of $800.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.00% senior notes due March 15, 2023 and the redemption of all of the then outstanding 11.625% senior subordinated notes totaling $450.0 million. During the year ended December 31, 2013, in connection with all of these financing activities, we incurred approximately $28.6 million of financing costs, of which $3.6 million was expensed. In addition, we expensed $17.8 million of previously-deferred financing costs as well as a $26.2 million early extinguishment premium and $8.7 million of unamortized original issue discount associated with the 11.625% senior subordinated notes.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts. The estimates and assumptions are based on historical experience and on other factors that management believes to be reasonable. Actual results may differ from those estimates. Critical accounting policies represent the areas where more significant judgments and estimates are used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. A discussion of such critical accounting policies, which include revenue recognition, our consolidation policy, goodwill and other intangible assets, real estate and income taxes can be found in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. There have been no material changes to these policies as of June 30, 2014.
44
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth items derived from our consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, presented in dollars and as a percentage of revenue (dollars in thousands):
EBITDA (1)
EBITDA, as adjusted (1)
EBITDA represents earnings before net interest expense, write-off of financing costs, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, while amounts shown for EBITDA, as adjusted, remove the impact of certain cash and non-cash charges related to acquisitions and cost containment expenses, as well as certain carried interest incentive compensation expense. Our management believes that both of these measures are useful in evaluating our operating performance compared to that of other companies in our industry because the calculations of EBITDA and EBITDA, as adjusted, generally eliminate the effects of financing and income taxes and the
45
accounting effects of capital spending and acquisitions, which would include impairment charges of goodwill and intangibles created from acquisitions. Such items may vary for different companies for reasons unrelated to overall operating performance. As a result, our management uses these measures to evaluate operating performance and for other discretionary purposes, including as a significant component when measuring our operating performance under our employee incentive programs. Additionally, we believe EBITDA and EBITDA, as adjusted, are useful to investors to assist them in getting a more complete picture of our results of operations.
However, EBITDA and EBITDA, as adjusted, are not recognized measurements under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, and when analyzing our operating performance, readers should use EBITDA and EBITDA, as adjusted, in addition to, and not as an alternative for, net income as determined in accordance with GAAP. Because not all companies use identical calculations, our presentation of EBITDA and EBITDA, as adjusted, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. Furthermore, EBITDA and EBITDA, as adjusted, are not intended to be measures of free cash flow for our management’s discretionary use, as they do not consider certain cash requirements such as tax and debt service payments. The amounts shown for EBITDA and EBITDA, as adjusted, also differ from the amounts calculated under similarly titled definitions in our debt instruments, which are further adjusted to reflect certain other cash and non-cash charges and are used to determine compliance with financial covenants and our ability to engage in certain activities, such as incurring additional debt and making certain restricted payments.
EBITDA and EBITDA, as adjusted for selected charges are calculated as follows (dollars in thousands):
Interest expense (2)
Provision for income taxes (3)
Less:
EBITDA (4)
Adjustments:
Carried interest incentive compensation
Integration and other costs related to acquisitions
EBITDA, as adjusted (4)
46
Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
We reported consolidated net income of $105.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 on revenue of $2.1 billion as compared to consolidated net income of $69.9 million on revenue of $1.7 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2013.
Our revenue on a consolidated basis for the three months ended June 30, 2014 increased by $384.8 million, or 22.1%, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013. This increase was enhanced by contributions from the Norland Acquisition. However, the revenue increase also reflects strong organic growth, fueled by higher worldwide property, facilities and project management fees, excluding the impact of the Norland Acquisition (up 14.9%), increased leasing (up 13.6%) and sales (up 5.4%) activity. Foreign currency translation had a $1.3 million positive impact on total revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2014, primarily driven by strength in the British pound sterling and Euro, partially offset by weakness in the Australian dollar, Canadian dollar, Indian rupee and Japanese yen in the current year versus the prior year.
Our cost of services on a consolidated basis increased by $295.6 million, or 29.0%, during the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013. This increase was primarily due to higher costs associated with our global property and facilities management contracts, particularly due to the Norland Acquisition. In addition, our sales professionals generally are paid on a commission basis, which substantially correlates with our transaction revenue performance. Accordingly, the increase in sales and lease transaction revenue led to a corresponding increase in commission accruals. Foreign currency translation had a $2.4 million positive impact on cost of services during the three months ended June 30, 2014. Cost of services as a percentage of revenue increased from 58.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2013 to 61.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2014, largely due to the Norland Acquisition. Excluding activity associated with Norland, cost of services as a percentage of revenue was 59.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2014, compared to 58.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2013.
Our operating, administrative and other expenses on a consolidated basis increased by $66.7 million, or 13.4%, during the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013. The increase was partially due to costs associated with the Norland Acquisition. Higher payroll-related costs, including bonuses, as well as increased insurance and consulting costs also contributed to the variance. Foreign currency translation had a $3.5 million negative impact on total operating expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2014. Operating expenses as a percentage of revenue decreased from 28.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2013 to 26.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2014, as a result of the Norland Acquisition. Excluding activity associated with Norland, operating expenses as a percentage of revenue were essentially flat versus the prior-year quarter.
Our depreciation and amortization expense on a consolidated basis increased by $19.7 million, or 45.2%, during the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013. This increase was primarily attributable to higher amortization expense relative to intangibles acquired in the Norland Acquisition. An increase in depreciation expense in the current year driven by technology-related capital expenditures also contributed to the increase.
Our gain on disposition of real estate on a consolidated basis was $23.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to $7.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013. These gains resulted from activity within our Global Investment Management and Development Services segments. The increase over the prior-year period is largely due to our adoption of Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, 2014-08, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity” effective January 1, 2014 and as a result, no longer reporting discontinued operations in the ordinary course of our business. Prior to January 1, 2014, in the ordinary course of business, if we disposed of real estate assets, or held real estate assets for sale, that were considered components of an entity in accordance with Topic 360, and if we did not have, or
expect to have, significant continuing involvement with the operation of these real estate assets after disposition,
47
we were required to recognize operating profits or losses and gains or losses on disposition of these assets as discontinued operations in our consolidated statements of operations in the periods in which they occurred.
Our equity income from unconsolidated subsidiaries on a consolidated basis increased by $2.7 million, or 41.6%, for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013. This increase was primarily driven by higher equity earnings associated with gains on property sales within our Global Investment Management segment in the current year.
Our other income on a consolidated basis increased by $4.8 million, or 315.1%, during the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013 and was primarily reported within our Global Investment Management segment. This increase primarily relates to higher net realized and unrealized gains in the current year related to co-investments in our real estate securities business.
Our consolidated interest income was $1.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 versus $1.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013.
Our consolidated interest expense decreased by $9.1 million, or 24.1%, for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013, primarily driven by the redemption in full of our 11.625% senior subordinated notes (aggregate principal of $450.0 million) in June of 2013.
Our write-off of financing costs on a consolidated basis was $42.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, which primarily included costs associated with the redemption in full of our 11.625% senior subordinated notes, including a $26.2 million early extinguishment premium and the write-off of $16.1 million of unamortized original issue discount and previously deferred financing costs.
Our provision for income taxes on a consolidated basis was $64.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to $45.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013. This increase was driven by the significant growth in pre-tax income in the current year. Our effective tax rate from continuing operations, after adjusting pre-tax income to remove the portion attributable to non-controlling interests, decreased to 37.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to 39.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2013, primarily due to the impact of losses sustained in jurisdictions where no tax benefit could be provided. Excluding the impact of such losses, our effective rate was 36.8% for both periods. We anticipate our full year 2014 effective tax rate to be approximately 35%.
Our consolidated income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes, was $3.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013. This income was reported in our Development Services and Global Investment Management segments and mostly related to gains from property sales, which were largely attributable to non-controlling interests. As previously mentioned, on January 1, 2014, we adopted ASU 2014-08 and as a result, no longer anticipate reporting discontinued operations in the ordinary course of our business.
Our net income attributable to non-controlling interests on a consolidated basis was $24.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to $4.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013. This activity primarily reflects our non-controlling interests’ share of income within our Global Investment Management segment.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
We reported consolidated net income of $173.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 on revenue of $4.0 billion as compared to consolidated net income of $107.4 million on revenue of $3.2 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2013.
48
Our revenue on a consolidated basis for the six months ended June 30, 2014 increased by $770.6 million, or 24.0%, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013. This increase was enhanced by contributions from the Norland Acquisition. However, the revenue increase also reflects strong organic growth, fueled by higher worldwide property, facilities and project management fees, excluding the impact of the Norland Acquisition (up 13.2%), increased sales (up 14.0%) and leasing (up 11.9%) activity. Foreign currency translation had a $13.1 million negative impact on total revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2014, primarily driven by weakness in the Australian dollar, Canadian dollar, Indian rupee and Japanese yen, partially offset by strength in the British pound sterling and Euro in the current year versus the prior year.
Our cost of services on a consolidated basis increased by $595.9 million, or 31.7%, during the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013. This increase was primarily due to higher costs associated with our global property and facilities management contracts, particularly due to the Norland Acquisition. In addition, as previously mentioned, our sales professionals generally are paid on a commission basis, which substantially correlates with our transaction revenue performance. Accordingly, the increase in sales and lease transaction revenue led to a corresponding increase in commission accruals. Foreign currency translation had a $14.9 million positive impact on cost of services during the six months ended June 30, 2014. Cost of services as a percentage of revenue increased from 58.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 to 62.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2014, largely due to the Norland Acquisition. Excluding activity associated with Norland, cost of services as a percentage of revenue was 59.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared to 58.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2013.
Our operating, administrative and other expenses on a consolidated basis increased by $125.6 million, or 13.0%, during the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013. The increase was primarily driven by costs associated with the Norland Acquisition. Higher payroll-related costs, including bonuses, as well as increased insurance and consulting costs also contributed to the variance. Foreign currency translation had a $0.7 million negative impact on total operating expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2014. Operating expenses as a percentage of revenue decreased from 30.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 to 27.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2014, as a result of the Norland Acquisition. Excluding activity associated with Norland, operating expenses as a percentage of revenue were 29.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared to 30.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2013.
Our depreciation and amortization expense on a consolidated basis increased by $38.6 million, or 43.0%, during the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013. This increase was primarily attributable to higher amortization expense relative to intangibles acquired in the Norland Acquisition. An increase in depreciation expense in the current year driven by technology-related capital expenditures also contributed to the increase.
Our gain on disposition of real estate on a consolidated basis was $29.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to $10.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013. These gains resulted from activity within our Global Investment Management and Development Services segments. The increase over the prior-year period is largely due to our adoption of ASU 2014-08.
Our equity income from unconsolidated subsidiaries on a consolidated basis increased by $8.0 million, or 48.9%, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013. This increase was primarily driven by higher equity earnings associated with gains on property sales within our Development Services segment in the current year.
Our other income on a consolidated basis increased by $6.9 million, or 164.1%, during the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013 and was primarily reported within our Global Investment Management segment. This increase primarily relates to higher net realized and unrealized gains in the current year related to co-investments in our real estate securities business.
49
Our consolidated interest income was $2.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 versus $3.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013.
Our consolidated interest expense decreased by $23.4 million, or 29.3%, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013, reflecting the effects of our refinancing activities in the first half of 2013.
Our write-off of financing costs on a consolidated basis was $56.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, primarily related to costs associated with the redemption in full of our 11.625% senior subordinated notes, including a $26.2 million early extinguishment premium and the write-off of $16.1 million of unamortized original issue discount and previously deferred financing costs. In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2013, we wrote-off $10.4 million of unamortized deferred financing costs associated with our previous credit agreement and incurred fees of $3.6 million in connection with our new credit agreement and 5.00% senior notes.
Our provision for income taxes on a consolidated basis was $102.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to $64.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013. This increase was driven by the significant growth in pre-tax income in the current year. Our effective tax rate from continuing operations, after adjusting pre-tax income to remove the portion attributable to non-controlling interests, decreased to 37.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to 38.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2013, primarily due to the impact of losses sustained in jurisdictions where no tax benefit could be provided. Excluding the impact of such losses, our effective rate was consistent at 35.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2014 versus 35.6% for the same period in the prior year.
Our consolidated income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes, was $24.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013. This income was reported in our Development Services and Global Investment Management segments and mostly related to gains from property sales, which were largely attributable to non-controlling interests. As previously mentioned, on January 1, 2014, we adopted ASU 2014-08 and as a result, no longer anticipate reporting discontinued operations in the ordinary course of our business.
Our net income attributable to non-controlling interests on a consolidated basis was $25.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to $28.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013. This activity primarily reflects our non-controlling interests’ share of income within our Global Investment Management and Development Services segments.
Segment Operations
We report our operations through the following segments: (1) Americas, (2) EMEA, (3) Asia Pacific, (4) Global Investment Management and (5) Development Services. The Americas consists of operations located in the United States, Canada and key markets in Latin America. EMEA mainly consists of operations in Europe, while Asia Pacific includes operations in Asia, Australia and New Zealand. The Global Investment Management business consists of investment management operations in North America, Europe and Asia. The Development Services business consists of real estate development and investment activities primarily in the United States.
50
The following table summarizes our revenue, costs and expenses and operating income (loss) by our Americas, EMEA, Asia Pacific, Global Investment Management and Development Services operating segments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (dollars in thousands):
EBITDA (1) (2)
EBITDA (1) (3)
51
Revenue increased by $122.1 million, or 11.0%, for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013. This improvement was primarily driven by improved leasing activity, as well as higher property, facilities and project management fees. Foreign currency translation had an $8.8 million negative impact on total revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2014, primarily driven by weakness in the Canadian dollar when converting to U.S. dollars in the current year versus the prior year.
Cost of services increased by $89.2 million, or 12.5%, for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013, primarily due to increased commission expense resulting from higher lease transaction revenue. Higher salaries and related costs associated with our property, facilities and project management contracts also contributed to an increase in cost of services in the current year. Foreign currency translation had a $5.7 million positive impact on cost of services during the three months ended June 30, 2014. Cost of services as a percentage of revenue increased to 64.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2014 from 64.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2013, primarily due to a shift in the mix of revenue, with outsourcing comprising a greater portion of the total than in the prior-year period.
Operating, administrative and other expenses increased by $28.7 million, or 11.9%, for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013. The increase was primarily driven by higher payroll-related costs, which resulted from increased headcount, as well as higher insurance and consulting costs. Foreign currency translation had a $2.7 million positive impact on total operating expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2014.
Revenue increased by $240.7 million, or 89.1%, for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013. The increase was enhanced by contributions from the Norland Acquisition. Excluding Norland, revenue was up 16.4% and growth was strong in property, facilities and project management, and sales activity. Foreign currency translation had a $19.5 million positive impact on total revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2014, primarily driven by strength in the British pound sterling and Euro when converting to U.S. dollars in the current year versus the prior year.
Cost of services increased by $196.7 million, or 120.3%, for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013 primarily due to higher costs associated with our global property and facilities management contracts, particularly due to the Norland Acquisition. Foreign currency translation had an $11.4 million negative impact on cost of services during the three months ended June 30, 2014. Cost of services as a percentage of revenue increased to 70.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2014 from 60.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2013, mainly due to the Norland Acquisition. Excluding activity associated with Norland, cost of services as a percentage of revenue was 60.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2014, an improvement over the 60.5% of revenue recorded in the year ago quarter.
Operating, administrative and other expenses increased by $28.7 million, or 30.2%, for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013. The increase was primarily driven by costs associated with the Norland Acquisition. Higher payroll-related costs, including bonuses, which resulted from increased headcount and improved operating performance, also contributed to the current year increase. Foreign currency translation had a $6.7 million negative impact on total operating expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2014.
52
Revenue increased by $8.1 million, or 3.5%, for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013, reflecting improved overall performance in several countries, most notably in Australia and India. This increase was partially offset by foreign currency translation, which had a $12.9 million negative impact on total revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2014, primarily driven by weakness in the Australian dollar, Japanese yen and Indian rupee when converting to U.S. dollars in the current year versus the prior year.
Cost of services increased by $9.8 million, or 6.9%, for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013, driven by increased commission expense resulting from higher transaction revenue as well as a concentration of commissions among higher producing professionals in Australia and Japan. Higher salaries and related costs associated with our property and facilities management contracts also contributed to an increase in cost of services in the current year. Foreign currency translation had an $8.1 million positive impact on cost of services during the three months ended June 30, 2014. Cost of services as a percentage of revenue increased to 63.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2014 from 61.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2013, primarily driven by the aforementioned reasons.
Operating, administrative and other expenses increased by $0.7 million, or 1.0%, for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013. The increase was primarily driven by higher payroll-related and occupancy costs, but was mostly offset by foreign currency translation, which had a $3.1 million positive impact on total operating expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2014.
Revenue increased by $11.2 million, or 9.7%, for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013, primarily driven by carried interest revenue earned in the current year. Foreign currency translation had a $3.5 million positive impact on total revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2014.
Operating, administrative and other expenses increased by $11.2 million, or 13.6%, for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013. This increase was primarily driven by higher carried interest expense incurred in the current year as well as higher bonuses, which resulted from improved operating performance in the current year. Foreign currency translation had a $2.6 million negative impact on total operating expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2014.
Total AUM as of June 30, 2014 totaled $92.8 billion, up 4% from year-end 2013. This business is transitioning from gain-harvesting in 2013 to capital-deployment in 2014. A rollforward of our AUM by product type for the three months ended June 30, 2014 is as follows (dollars in billions):
Balance at April 1, 2014
Inflows
Outflows
Market appreciation
AUM generally refers to the properties and other assets with respect to which we provide (or participate in) oversight, investment management services and other advice, and which generally consist of real estate
53
properties or loans, securities portfolios and investments in operating companies and joint ventures. Our AUM is intended principally to reflect the extent of our presence in the real estate market, not the basis for determining our management fees. Our material assets under management consist of:
Our calculation of AUM may differ from the calculations of other asset managers, and as a result, this measure may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other asset managers.
Revenue increased by $2.7 million, or 27.0%, for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013, primarily driven by higher development fees in the current year due to an increase in new projects started.
Operating, administrative and other expenses decreased by $2.6 million, or 16.8%, for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013. This decrease was primarily driven by lower bonuses due to lower gains on property sales in the current year, partially offset by higher payroll-related costs attributable to an increase in headcount to support the growing business.
As of June 30, 2014, development projects in process totaled $4.8 billion, down 2% from year-end 2013, and the inventory of pipeline deals totaled $1.9 billion, up 27% from year-end 2013.
Revenue increased by $217.8 million, or 10.7%, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013. This improvement was primarily driven by higher property, facilities and project management fees, as well as improved leasing and sales activity. The pullback in multi-housing lending from Government Sponsored Entities, or GSEs, which began in the second half of 2013, had a $13.0 million adverse impact on revenue in our U.S. commercial mortgage brokerage business, which was more than offset by increased U.S. loan originations through other capital sources and higher loan sales activity. Foreign currency translation had an $18.3 million negative impact on total revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2014, primarily driven by weakness in the Canadian dollar when converting to U.S. dollars in the current year versus the prior year.
Cost of services increased by $155.4 million, or 11.9%, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013, primarily due to increased commission expense resulting from higher sales and lease transaction revenue. Higher salaries and related costs associated with our property, facilities and project management contracts also contributed to an increase in cost of services in the current year. Foreign currency translation had an $11.8 million positive impact on cost of services during the six months ended June 30, 2014. Cost of services as a percentage of revenue increased to 64.8% for the six months ended June 30,
54
2014 from 64.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2013, primarily due to the decline in lending activity with GSEs, which led to a revenue decrease of $13.0 million, with no corresponding cost of services associated with that revenue stream.
Operating, administrative and other expenses increased by $39.9 million, or 8.5%, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013. The increase was primarily driven by higher payroll-related costs, which resulted from increased headcount, as well as higher insurance and consulting costs. Foreign currency translation had a $5.3 million positive impact on total operating expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2014.
Revenue increased by $530.8 million, or 106.4%, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013. The increase was enhanced by contributions from the Norland Acquisition. Excluding Norland, revenue was up 23.6% and growth was strong across all major business lines, most notably in property, facilities and project management, sales and leasing activity. Foreign currency translation had a $31.7 million positive impact on total revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2014, primarily driven by strength in the British pound sterling and Euro when converting to U.S. dollars in the current year versus the prior year.
Cost of services increased by $422.5 million, or 136.6%, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013, primarily due to higher costs associated with our global property and facilities management contracts, particularly due to the Norland Acquisition. Foreign currency translation had a $17.8 million negative impact on cost of services during the six months ended June 30, 2014. Cost of services as a percentage of revenue increased to 71.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2014 from 62.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2013, mainly due to the Norland Acquisition. Excluding activity associated with Norland, cost of services as a percentage of revenue was 60.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2014, an improvement over the 62.0% of revenue recorded in the prior year quarter, primarily driven by higher transaction revenue in the current year in certain countries that have a significant fixed cost compensation structure.
Operating, administrative and other expenses increased by $69.4 million, or 38.9%, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013. The increase was primarily driven by costs associated with the Norland Acquisition. Higher payroll-related costs, including bonuses, which resulted from increased headcount and improved operating performance, as well as increased consulting costs, also contributed to the current year increase. Foreign currency translation had a $10.3 million negative impact on total operating expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2014.
Revenue increased by $22.3 million, or 5.4%, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013, reflecting improved overall performance in several countries, most notably in Australia, China, India and Japan, particularly in property, facilities and project management, sales and leasing activity. This increase was partially offset by foreign currency translation, which had a $31.9 million negative impact on total revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2014, primarily driven by weakness in the Australian dollar, Japanese yen and Indian rupee when converting to U.S. dollars in the current year versus the prior year.
Cost of services increased by $18.0 million, or 6.8%, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013, driven by increased commission expense resulting from higher sales and lease transaction revenue as well as a concentration of commissions among higher producing professionals in Australia and Japan. Higher salaries and related costs associated with our property and facilities management
55
contracts also contributed to an increase in cost of services in the current year. Foreign currency translation had a $20.9 million positive impact on cost of services during the six months ended June 30, 2014. Cost of services as a percentage of revenue increased to 64.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2014 from 63.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2013, primarily driven by the aforementioned reasons.
Operating, administrative and other expenses increased by $4.3 million, or 3.6%, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013. The increase was primarily driven by higher payroll-related, occupancy and consulting costs, but was largely offset by foreign currency translation, which had an $8.1 million positive impact on total operating expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2014.
Revenue decreased by $3.0 million, or 1.2%, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013, primarily driven by reduced asset management fees, reflecting the sale of assets in 2013 to harvest gains for fund investors and the decision to internalize the management of a private REIT. This reduction was partially offset by carried interest revenue earned in the current year as well as foreign currency translation, which had a $5.4 million positive impact on total revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2014.
Operating, administrative and other expenses increased by $8.5 million, or 5.0%, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013, primarily due to higher carried interest expense incurred in the current year as well as higher bonuses, which resulted from improved operating performance in the current year. Foreign currency translation also had a $3.8 million negative impact on total operating expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2014. These increases were partially offset by lower costs due to the sale of assets and internalization of the management of a private REIT discussed above.
A rollforward of our AUM by product type for the six months ended June 30, 2014 is as follows (dollars in billions):
Balance at January 1, 2014
Revenue increased by $2.7 million, or 12.0%, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013, primarily due to higher development fees in the current year due to an increase in new projects started.
Operating, administrative and other expenses increased by $3.5 million, or 11.7%, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013. This increase was primarily driven by higher bonuses as well as higher payroll-related costs attributable to an increase in headcount to support the growing business.
56
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We believe that we can satisfy our working capital requirements and funding of investments with internally generated cash flow and, as necessary, borrowings under our revolving credit facility. Our expected capital requirements for 2014 include up to approximately $185 million of anticipated net capital expenditures. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we incurred $47.4 million of net capital expenditures. As of June 30, 2014, we had committed to fund $24.3 million of additional capital to unconsolidated subsidiaries within our Development Services business, which may be called at any time. Additionally, as of June 30, 2014, we had aggregate commitments of $22.9 million to fund future co-investments in our Global Investment Management business, $8.7 million of which is expected to be funded in 2014.
In December 2013, we fortified our real estate outsourcing platform in Europe with the acquisition of Norland for approximately $474 million, which was financed with cash on hand and borrowings under our revolving credit facility. During 2011, we required substantial amounts of debt financing to fund strategic acquisitions. We also conducted three debt offerings in recent years. The first, in 2009, was part of a capital restructuring in response to the global economic recession, the second, in 2010, was to take advantage of low interest rates and term availability, and the third, in March 2013, was also to take advantage of market conditions to refinance other debt. Absent extraordinary transactions such as these and the equity offerings we completed during the unprecedented global capital markets disruption in 2008 and 2009, we historically have not sought external sources of financing and have relied on our internally generated cash flow and our revolving credit facility to fund our working capital, capital expenditure and investment requirements. In the absence of such extraordinary events, we anticipate that our cash flow from operations and our revolving credit facility would be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash requirements for the foreseeable future, but at a minimum for the next 12 months. From time to time, we may again seek to take advantage of market opportunities to refinance existing debt securities with new debt securities at lower interest rates, with longer maturities or at better terms.
As evidenced above, from time to time, we consider potential strategic acquisitions. We believe that any future significant acquisitions that we may make could require us to obtain additional debt or equity financing. In the past, we have been able to obtain such financing for material transactions on terms that we believed to be reasonable. However, it is possible that we may not be able to find acquisition financing on favorable terms, or at all, in the future if we decide to make any further material acquisitions.
Our long-term liquidity needs, other than those related to ordinary course obligations and commitments such as operating leases, generally are comprised of three elements. The first is the repayment of the outstanding and anticipated principal amounts of our long-term indebtedness. We are unable to project with certainty whether our long-term cash flow from operations will be sufficient to repay our long-term debt when it comes due. If our cash flow is insufficient, then we expect that we would need to refinance such indebtedness or otherwise amend its terms to extend the maturity dates. We cannot make any assurances that such refinancing or amendments would be available on attractive terms, if at all.
The second long-term liquidity need is the repayment of obligations under our pension plans in the United Kingdom. Our subsidiaries based in the United Kingdom maintain two contributory defined benefit pension plans to provide retirement benefits to existing and former employees participating in the plans. With respect to these plans, our historical policy has been to contribute annually, an amount to fund pension cost as actuarially determined and as required by applicable laws and regulations. Our contributions to these plans are invested and, if these investments do not perform in the future as well as we expect, we will be required to provide additional funding to cover any shortfall. The underfunded status of our defined benefit pension plans included in pension liability in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q was $69.1 million and $68.0 million at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. We expect to contribute a total of $6.3 million to fund our pension plans for the year ending December 31, 2014, of which $3.1 million was funded as of June 30, 2014.
57
The third long-term liquidity need is the payment of obligations related to acquisitions. Our acquisition structures often include deferred and/or contingent purchase price payments in future periods that are subject to the passage of time or achievement of certain performance metrics and other conditions. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had accrued for $92.0 million and $86.9 million, respectively, of deferred purchase consideration, which was included in accounts payable and accrued expenses and in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In July 2014, $40.0 million of deferred purchase consideration related to the Norland Acquisition (which was included in the $92.0 million accrued as of June 30, 2014) was paid.
Historical Cash Flows
Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities totaled $224.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $84.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013. This variance was primarily due to an increase in receivables in the current year and greater sales of real estate held for sale and under development in the prior year. In addition, higher bonuses, income taxes and net payments to vendors paid in the current year also contributed to the increase. These items were partially offset by an increase in bonus accruals and improved operating performance in the current year.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities totaled $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $65.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013. This variance was primarily driven by lower proceeds received from the sale of real estate held for investment in the current year, as well as greater amounts paid for capital expenditures in the current year.
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $110.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to net cash used in financing activities of $740.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013. This variance was primarily due to our refinancing efforts in the first half of 2013, including the net repayment of $904.2 million of senior secured term loans and the redemption of $450.0 million of 11.625% senior subordinated notes, partially offset by the issuance of $800.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.00% senior notes. Increased net borrowings under our revolving credit facility in the current year and higher net repayments of notes payable on real estate within our Development Services segment in the prior year also contributed to the variance.
Significant Indebtedness
Our level of indebtedness increases the possibility that we may be unable to pay the principal amount of our indebtedness and other obligations when due. In addition, we may incur additional debt from time to time to finance strategic acquisitions, investments, joint ventures or for other purposes, subject to the restrictions contained in the documents governing our indebtedness. If we incur additional debt, the risks associated with our leverage, including our ability to service our debt, would increase.
Since 2001, we have maintained credit facilities with Credit Suisse Group AG, or CS, and other lenders to fund strategic acquisitions and to provide for our working capital needs. On March 28, 2013, we entered into a new credit agreement (the Credit Agreement) with a syndicate of banks led by CS, as administrative and collateral agent, to completely refinance our previous credit agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2013, we completed a series of financing transactions, which included the repayment of $1.6 billion of our senior secured term loans under our previous credit agreement.
58
Our Credit Agreement currently provides for the following: (1) a $1.2 billion revolving credit facility, including revolving credit loans, letters of credit and a swingline loan facility, maturing on March 28, 2018; (2) a $500.0 million tranche A term loan facility (of which $300.0 million was on an optional delayed-draw basis for up to 120 days from March 28, 2013, which we drew down in June 2013 to partially fund the redemption of our 11.625% senior subordinated notes) requiring quarterly principal payments, which began on June 30, 2013 and continue through maturity on March 28, 2018; and (3) a $215.0 million tranche B term loan facility requiring quarterly principal payments, which began on June 30, 2013 and continue through December 31, 2020, with the balance payable at maturity on March 28, 2021.
The revolving credit facility allows for borrowings outside of the United States, with a $10.0 million sub-facility available to one of our Canadian subsidiaries, a $35.0 million sub-facility available to one of our Australian subsidiaries and one of our New Zealand subsidiaries and a $150.0 million sub-facility available to one of our U.K. subsidiaries. Additionally, outstanding borrowings under these sub-facilities may be up to 5.0% higher as allowed under the currency fluctuation provision in the Credit Agreement. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility bear interest at varying rates, based at our option, on either the applicable fixed rate plus 1.15% to 2.25% or the daily rate plus 0.125% to 1.25% as determined by reference to our ratio of total debt less available cash to EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement). As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had $336.0 million and $142.5 million, respectively, of revolving credit facility principal outstanding with related weighted average interest rates of 2.7% and 2.2%, respectively, which are included in short-term borrowings in the consolidated balance sheets set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report. As of June 30, 2014, letters of credit totaling $11.4 million were outstanding under the revolving credit facility. These letters of credit were primarily issued in the normal course of business as well as in connection with certain insurance programs and reduce the amount we may borrow under the revolving credit facility.
Borrowings under the term loan facilities as of June 30, 2014 bear interest, based at our option, on the following: for the tranche A term loan facility, on either the applicable fixed rate plus 1.50% to 2.75% or the daily rate plus 0.50% to 1.75%, as determined by reference to our ratio of total debt less available cash to EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement) and for the tranche B term loan facility, on either the applicable fixed rate plus 2.75% or the daily rate plus 1.75%. As of June 30, 2014, we had $665.4 million of term loan facilities principal outstanding (including $453.1 million of tranche A term loan facility and $212.3 million of tranche B term loan facility), which are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2013, we had $685.3 million of term loan facilities principal outstanding (including $471.9 million of tranche A term loan facility and $213.4 million of tranche B term loan facility), which are also included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report.
The Credit Agreement is jointly and severally guaranteed by us and substantially all of our domestic subsidiaries. Borrowings under our Credit Agreement are secured by a pledge of substantially all of the capital stock of our U.S. subsidiaries and 65.0% of the capital stock of certain non-U.S. subsidiaries. Also, the Credit Agreement requires us to pay a fee based on the total amount of the revolving credit facility commitment.
In March 2011, we entered into five interest rate swap agreements, all with effective dates in October 2011, and immediately designated them as cash flow hedges in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” The purpose of these interest rate swap agreements is to attempt to hedge potential changes to our cash flows due to the variable interest nature of our senior secured term loan facilities. The total notional amount of these interest rate swap agreements is $400.0 million, with $200.0 million expiring in October 2017 and $200.0 million expiring in September 2019. There was no significant hedge ineffectiveness for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the fair values of such interest rate swap agreements were reflected as a $30.3 million liability and a $29.0 million liability, respectively, and were included in other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report.
59
On March 14, 2013, CBRE Services, Inc., or CBRE, our wholly-owned subsidiary, issued $800.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.00% senior notes due March 15, 2023. The 5.00% senior notes are unsecured obligations of CBRE, senior to all of its current and future subordinated indebtedness, but effectively subordinated to all of its current and future secured indebtedness. The 5.00% senior notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior basis by us and each domestic subsidiary of CBRE that guarantees our Credit Agreement. Interest accrues at a rate of 5.00% per year and is payable semi-annually in arrears on March 15 and September 15, beginning on September 15, 2013. The 5.00% senior notes are redeemable at our option, in whole or in part, on or after March 15, 2018 at a redemption price of 102.5% of the principal amount on that date and at declining prices thereafter. In addition, at any time prior to March 15, 2018, the 5.00% senior notes may be redeemed by us, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100.0% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption, and an applicable premium (as defined in the indenture governing these notes), which is based on the excess of the present value of the March 15, 2018 redemption price plus all remaining interest payments through March 15, 2018, over the principal amount of the 5.00% senior notes on such redemption date. At any time prior to March 15, 2016, we may redeem up to 35.0% of the original principal amount of the 5.00% senior notes using the net cash proceeds from certain public offerings. If a change of control triggering event (as defined in the indenture governing these notes) occurs, we are obligated to make an offer to purchase the then outstanding 5.00% senior notes at a redemption price of 101.0% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. The amount of the 5.00% senior notes included in the consolidated balance sheets set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q was $800.0 million at both June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
On October 8, 2010, CBRE issued $350.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.625% senior notes due October 15, 2020. The 6.625% senior notes are unsecured obligations of CBRE, senior to all of its current and future subordinated indebtedness, but effectively subordinated to all of its current and future secured indebtedness. The 6.625% senior notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior basis by us and each domestic subsidiary of CBRE that guarantees our Credit Agreement. Interest accrues at a rate of 6.625% per year and is payable semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and October 15, having commenced on April 15, 2011. The 6.625% senior notes are redeemable at our option, in whole or in part, on or after October 15, 2014 at a redemption price of 104.969% of the principal amount on that date and at declining prices thereafter. In addition, at any time prior to October 15, 2014, the 6.625% senior notes may be redeemed by us, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest and an applicable premium (as defined in the indenture governing these notes), which is based on the greater of 1.00% of the principal amount of the 6.625% senior notes and the excess of the present value of the October 15, 2014 redemption price plus all remaining interest payments through October 15, 2014, over the principal amount of the 6.625% senior notes on such redemption date. Prior to October 15, 2013, up to 35.0% of the original issued amount of the 6.625% senior notes may have been redeemed at a redemption price of 106.625% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, solely with the net cash proceeds from public equity offerings. If a change of control triggering event (as defined in the indenture governing our 6.625% senior notes) occurs, we are obligated to make an offer to purchase the then outstanding 6.625% senior notes at a redemption price of 101.0% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The amount of the 6.625% senior notes included in the consolidated balance sheets set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q was $350.0 million at both June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
Our Credit Agreement and the indentures governing our 5.00% senior notes and 6.625% senior notes contain numerous restrictive covenants that, among other things, limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends or make distributions to stockholders, repurchase capital stock or debt, make investments, sell assets or subsidiary stock, create or permit liens on assets, engage in transactions with affiliates, enter into sale/leaseback transactions, issue subsidiary equity and enter into consolidations or mergers. Our Credit Agreement also currently requires us to maintain a minimum coverage ratio of EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement) to total interest expense of 2.00x and a maximum leverage ratio of total debt less available cash to EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of 4.25x. Our coverage ratio of EBITDA to total interest expense was 11.61x for the trailing twelve months ended June 30, 2014 and our leverage ratio of total debt less
60
available cash to EBITDA was 1.66x as of June 30, 2014. We may from time to time, in our sole discretion, look for opportunities to refinance or reduce our outstanding debt under our Credit Agreement and under our 5.00% senior notes and 6.625% senior notes.
From time to time, our Credit Agreement indebtedness and some of our other indebtedness is rated by certain nationally recognized statistical rating organizations. The interest rates under our Credit Agreement would be positively impacted if our issuer or long-term debt ratings improved to investment grade. In addition, changes in these ratings could impact the terms and availability of any future indebtedness.
We had short-term borrowings of $1.1 billion and $517.1 million as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, with related weighted average interest rates of 2.1% and 1.9%, respectively, which are included in the consolidated balance sheets set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report.
On March 2, 2007, we entered into a $50.0 million credit note with Wells Fargo Bank for the purpose of purchasing eligible investments, which include cash equivalents, agency securities, A1/P1 commercial paper and eligible money market funds. The proceeds of this note are not made generally available to us, but instead are deposited in an investment account maintained by Wells Fargo Bank and used and applied solely to purchase eligible investment securities. This agreement has been amended several times and currently provides for a $5.0 million revolving credit note, bears interest at 0.25% and has a maturity date of May 31, 2015. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there were no amounts outstanding under this note.
On March 4, 2008, we entered into a $35.0 million credit and security agreement with Bank of America, or BofA, for the purpose of purchasing eligible financial instruments, which include A1/P1 commercial paper, U.S. Treasury securities, Government Sponsored Enterprise, or GSE, discount notes (as defined in the credit and security agreement) and money market funds. The proceeds of this loan are not made generally available to us, but instead are deposited in an investment account maintained by BofA and used and applied solely to purchase eligible financial instruments. This agreement has been amended several times and currently provides for a $5.0 million credit line, bears interest at 1% and has a maturity date of April 30, 2015. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there were no amounts outstanding under this agreement.
On August 19, 2008, we entered into a $15.0 million uncommitted facility with First Tennessee Bank for the purpose of purchasing investments, which include cash equivalents, agency securities, A1/P1 commercial paper and eligible money market funds. The proceeds of this facility are not made generally available to us, but instead are held in a collateral account maintained by First Tennessee Bank. This agreement has been amended several times and currently provides for a $4.0 million credit line, bears interest at 0.25% and has a maturity date of August 31, 2014. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there were no amounts outstanding under this facility.
61
Our wholly-owned subsidiary, CBRE Capital Markets, has the following warehouse lines of credit: credit agreements with JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., or JP Morgan, BofA, TD Bank, N.A., or TD Bank, and Capital One, N.A., or Capital One, for the purpose of funding mortgage loans that will be resold, and a funding arrangement with Federal National Mortgage Association, or Fannie Mae, for the purpose of selling a percentage of certain closed multifamily loans.
On November 15, 2005, CBRE Capital Markets entered into a secured credit agreement with JP Morgan to establish a warehouse line of credit. This agreement has been amended several times and currently provides for a $175.0 million line of credit, bears interest at the daily LIBOR plus 1.90% and has a maturity date of October 27, 2014.
On April 16, 2008, CBRE Capital Markets entered into a secured credit agreement with BofA to establish a warehouse line of credit. The senior secured revolving line of credit currently provides for a $200.0 million line of credit, bears interest at the daily one-month LIBOR plus 1.60% and has a maturity date of May 27, 2015.
In August 2009, CBRE Capital Markets entered into a funding arrangement with Fannie Mae under its Multifamily As Soon As Pooled Plus Agreement and its Multifamily As Soon As Pooled Sale Agreement, or ASAP Program. Under the ASAP Program, CBRE Capital Markets may elect, on a transaction by transaction basis, to sell a percentage of certain closed multifamily loans to Fannie Mae on an expedited basis. After all contingencies are satisfied, the ASAP Program requires that CBRE Capital Markets repurchase the interest in the multifamily loan previously sold to Fannie Mae followed by either a full delivery back to Fannie Mae via whole loan execution or a securitization into a mortgage backed security. Under this agreement, the maximum outstanding balance under the ASAP Program cannot exceed $200.0 million and, between the sale date to Fannie Mae and the repurchase date by CBRE Capital Markets, the outstanding balance bears interest and is payable to Fannie Mae at the daily LIBOR rate plus 1.35% with a LIBOR floor of 0.35%. This arrangement remains in place but is cancelable at any time by Fannie Mae with notice.
On December 21, 2010, CBRE Capital Markets entered into a secured credit agreement with TD Bank to establish a warehouse line of credit. The secured revolving line of credit has been amended several times and currently provides for a $300.0 million line of credit, bears interest at the daily one-month LIBOR plus 1.50% and has a maturity date of June 30, 2015.
On July 30, 2012, CBRE Capital Markets entered into a secured credit agreement with Capital One to establish a warehouse line of credit. This agreement provides for a $200.0 million senior secured revolving line of credit and bears interest at the daily one-month LIBOR plus 1.55% and has a maturity date of July 29, 2015.
On September 21, 2012, CBRE Capital Markets entered into a repurchase facility with JP Morgan for additional warehouse capacity pursuant to a Master Repurchase Agreement. This agreement provided for a $200.0 million warehouse facility, bore interest at the daily one-month LIBOR plus 2.25% and expired on January 16, 2014.
On March 17, 2014, CBRE Capital Markets’ wholly-owned subsidiary, CBRE Business Lending, Inc., entered into a secured credit agreement with JP Morgan to establish a line of credit. This agreement provides for a $25.0 million secured revolving line of credit, bears interest at daily LIBOR plus 2.75% and has a maturity date of March 16, 2015.
During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we had a maximum of $779.7 million of warehouse lines of credit principal outstanding. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had $731.5 million and $374.6 million of warehouse lines of credit principal outstanding, respectively, which are included in short-term borrowings in the consolidated balance sheets set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report. Additionally, we had $739.6 million and $381.5 million of mortgage loans held for sale (warehouse receivables), as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, which substantially represented mortgage loans funded through the lines of credit that, while committed to be purchased, had not yet been purchased and which are also included in the consolidated balance sheets set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report.
62
A significant number of our subsidiaries in Europe have had a Euro cash pool loan since 2001, which is used to fund their short-term liquidity needs. The Euro cash pool loan is an overdraft line for our European operations issued by HSBC Bank. The Euro cash pool loan has no stated maturity date and bears interest at varying rates based on LIBOR or EDF plus 2.0%. As of June 30, 2014, there was $6.6 million of Euro cash pool loan outstanding, which has been included in short-term borrowings in the consolidated balance sheets set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report. There were no amounts outstanding under this facility as of December 31, 2013.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We had guarantees totaling $14.1 million as of June 30, 2014, excluding guarantees related to pension liabilities, consolidated indebtedness and other obligations for which we have outstanding liabilities already accrued on our consolidated balance sheet, and operating leases. The $14.1 million mainly represents guarantees of obligations of unconsolidated subsidiaries, which expire at varying dates through June 2017, as well as various guarantees of management contracts in our operations overseas, which expire at the end of each of the respective agreements. The remainder of the guarantees consist of guarantees related to our defined benefit pension plans in the United Kingdom (in excess of our outstanding pension liability of $69.1 million as of June 30, 2014), which are continuous guarantees that will not expire until all amounts have been paid out for our pension liabilities.
In addition, as of June 30, 2014, we had numerous completion and budget guarantees relating to development projects. These guarantees are made by us in the ordinary course of our Development Services business. Each of these guarantees requires us to complete construction of the relevant project within a specified timeframe and/or within a specified budget, with us potentially being liable for costs to complete in excess of such timeframe or budget. However, we generally have “guaranteed maximum price” contracts with reputable general contractors with respect to projects for which we provide these guarantees. These contracts are intended to pass the risk to such contractors. While there can be no assurance, we do not expect to incur any material losses under these guarantees.
In January 2008, CBRE Multifamily Capital, Inc., or CBRE MCI, a wholly-owned subsidiary of CBRE Capital Markets, entered into an agreement with Fannie Mae, under Fannie Mae’s Delegated Underwriting and Servicing Lender Program, or DUS Program, to provide financing for multifamily housing with five or more units. Under the DUS Program, CBRE MCI originates, underwrites, closes and services loans without prior approval by Fannie Mae, and in selected cases, is subject to sharing up to one-third of any losses on loans originated under the DUS Program. CBRE MCI has funded loans subject to such loss sharing arrangements with unpaid principal balances of $8.6 billion at June 30, 2014. Additionally, CBRE MCI has funded loans under the DUS Program that are not subject to loss sharing arrangements with unpaid principal balances of approximately $367.1 million at June 30, 2014. CBRE MCI, under its agreement with Fannie Mae, must post cash reserves under formulas established by Fannie Mae to provide for sufficient capital in the event losses occur. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, CBRE MCI had $22.1 million and $16.6 million, respectively, of cash deposited under this reserve arrangement, and had provided approximately $15.0 million and $13.8 million, respectively, of loan loss accruals. Fannie Mae’s recourse under the DUS Program is limited to the assets of CBRE MCI, which totaled approximately $374.0 million (including $225.2 million of warehouse receivables, a substantial majority of which are pledged against warehouse lines of credit and are therefore not available to Fannie Mae) at June 30, 2014.
63
An important part of the strategy for our Global Investment Management business involves investing our capital in certain real estate investments with our clients. These co-investments typically range from 2.0% to 5.0% of the equity in a particular fund. As of June 30, 2014, we had aggregate commitments of $22.9 million to fund future co-investments, $8.7 million of which is expected to be funded in 2014. In addition to required future capital contributions, some of the co-investment entities may request additional capital from us and our subsidiaries holding investments in those assets and the failure to provide these contributions could have adverse consequences to our interests in these investments.
Additionally, an important part of our Development Services business strategy is to invest in unconsolidated real estate subsidiaries as a principal (in most cases co-investing with our clients). As of June 30, 2014, we had committed to fund $24.3 million of additional capital to these unconsolidated subsidiaries, which may be called at any time.
Seasonality
A significant portion of our revenue is seasonal, which an investor should keep in mind when comparing our financial condition and results of operations on a quarter-by-quarter basis. Historically, our revenue, operating income, net income and cash flow from operating activities tends to be lower in the first two quarters and higher in the third and fourth quarters of each year. Earnings and cash flow have generally been concentrated in the fourth quarter due to the focus on completing sales, financing and leasing transactions prior to calendar year-end. This has historically resulted in lower profits or a loss in the first quarter, with revenue and profitability improving in each subsequent quarter.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” This ASU requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, when it becomes effective on January 1, 2017. This ASU permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. Early adoption is not permitted. We are evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. We have not yet selected a transition method nor have we determined the effect of this ASU on our ongoing financial reporting.
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period.” This ASU requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period should be treated as a performance condition. The performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. ASU 2014-12 is effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. We elected to early adopt this ASU retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of January 1, 2013 and to all new or modified awards thereafter. Since we only began granting performance-based stock awards in the latter part of 2013, the adoption of this update did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
64
Cautionary Note on Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “should,” “propose,” “continue,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “predict,” “project,” “will” and similar terms and phrases are used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to identify forward-looking statements. Except for historical information contained herein, the matters addressed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements. These statements relate to analyses and other information based on forecasts of future results and estimates of amounts not yet determinable. These statements also relate to our future prospects, developments and business strategies.
These forward-looking statements are made based on our management’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events affecting us and are subject to uncertainties and factors relating to our operations and business environment, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control. These uncertainties and factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those matters expressed in or implied by these forward-looking statements.
The following factors are among those, but are not only those, that may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements:
disruptions in general economic and business conditions, particularly in geographies where our business may be concentrated;
volatility and disruption of the securities, capital and credit markets, interest rate increases, the cost and availability of capital for investment in real estate, clients’ willingness to make real estate or long-term contractual commitments and other factors affecting the value of real estate assets, inside and outside the United States;
our ability to control costs relative to revenue growth;
our ability to retain and incentivize producers;
our ability to identify, acquire and integrate synergistic and accretive businesses;
costs and potential future capital requirements relating to businesses we may acquire;
integration challenges arising out of companies we may acquire;
continued high levels of, or increases in, unemployment and general slowdowns in commercial activity;
variations in historically customary seasonal patterns that cause our business not to perform as expected;
trends in pricing and risk assumption for commercial real estate services;
our ability to diversify our revenue model to offset cyclical economic trends in the commercial real estate industry;
foreign currency fluctuations;
our ability to attract new user and investor clients;
our ability to retain major clients and renew related contracts;
a reduction by companies in their reliance on outsourcing for their commercial real estate needs, which would affect our revenues and operating performance;
client actions to restrain project spending and reduce outsourced staffing levels;
changes in tax laws in the United States or in other jurisdictions in which our business may be concentrated that reduce or eliminate deductions or other tax benefits we receive;
65
our ability to maintain our effective tax rate at or below current levels;
our ability to compete globally, or in specific geographic markets or business segments that are material to us;
our ability to leverage our global services platform to maximize and sustain long-term cash flow;
our ability to maintain EBITDA margins that enable us to continue investing in our platform and client service offerings;
our exposure to liabilities in connection with real estate advisory and property management activities and our ability to procure sufficient insurance coverage on acceptable terms;
declines in lending activity of Government Sponsored Enterprises, regulatory oversight of such activity and our mortgage servicing revenue from the U.S. commercial real estate mortgage market;
our ability to manage fluctuations in net earnings and cash flow, which could result from poor performance in our investment programs, including our participation as a principal in real estate investments;
the ability of our Global Investment Management business to maintain and grow assets under management and achieve desired investment returns for our investors, and any potential related litigation, liabilities or reputational harm possible if we fail to do so;
our ability to comply with laws and regulations related to our global operations, including real estate licensure, labor and employment laws and regulations, as well as the anti-corruption laws of the U.S. and other countries;
our leverage and our ability to perform under our credit facilities;
liabilities under guarantees, or for construction defects, that we incur in our Development Services business;
the ability of CBRE Capital Markets to periodically amend, or replace, on satisfactory terms, the agreements for its warehouse lines of credit;
the effect of significant movements in average cap rates across different property types;
the effect of implementation of new accounting rules and standards; and
the other factors described elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, included under the headings “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations–Critical Accounting Policies” and “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” or as described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, in particular in “Item 1A, Risk Factors”, or in the other documents and reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statements are made. You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking information, except to the extent required by applicable securities laws. If we do update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be drawn that we will make additional updates with respect to those or other forward-looking statements. Additional information concerning these and other risks and uncertainties is contained in our other periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
66
The information in this section should be read in connection with the information on market risk related to changes in interest rates and non-U.S. currency exchange rates in Part II, Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. Our exposure to market risk consists of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations related to our international operations and changes in interest rates on debt obligations. We manage such risk primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of our debt funding and by using derivative financial instruments. We apply the “Derivatives and Hedging” Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) (Topic 815) when accounting for derivative financial instruments. In all cases, we view derivative financial instruments as a risk management tool and, accordingly, do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.
During the six months ended June 30, 2014, approximately 45% of our business was transacted in local currencies of foreign countries, the majority of which includes the Australian dollar, the British pound sterling, the Canadian dollar, the Chinese yuan, the Euro, the Indian rupee, the Japanese yen and the Singapore dollar. We attempt to manage our exposure primarily by balancing assets and liabilities and maintaining cash positions in foreign currencies only at levels necessary for operating purposes. We routinely monitor our exposure to currency exchange rate changes in connection with transactions and sometimes enter into foreign currency exchange option and forward contracts to limit our exposure to such transactions, as appropriate. In the normal course of business, we also sometimes utilize derivative financial instruments in the form of foreign currency exchange contracts to attempt to mitigate foreign currency exchange exposure resulting from intercompany loans, expected cash flow and earnings. Included in the consolidated statement of operations set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q were losses of $0.8 million and $0.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, resulting from net losses on foreign currency exchange option agreements. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we did not have any foreign currency exchange option agreements outstanding.
In March 2014, we began a foreign currency exchange forward hedging program by entering into 38 foreign currency exchange forward contracts, including agreements to buy U.S. dollars and sell Australian dollars, Canadian dollars, Japanese yen, Euros, and British pound sterling covering a notional amount of $209.7 million. The purpose of these forward contracts is to attempt to mitigate the risk of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates that would adversely impact our foreign currency denominated EBITDA. Hedge accounting was not elected for any of these contracts. As such, the changes in the fair values of these contracts are recorded directly in earnings. Included in the consolidated statement of operations set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report were net losses of $3.4 million for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2014. As of June 30, 2014, we had 22 foreign currency exchange forward contracts outstanding covering a notional amount of $155.5 million. As of June 30, 2014, the fair value of forward contracts with one counterparty aggregated to a $0.7 million asset position, which was included in other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report. As of June 30, 2014, the fair value of forward contracts with four counterparties aggregated to a $3.5 million liability position, which was included in other current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report.
In March 2011, we entered into five interest rate swap agreements, all with effective dates in October 2011, and immediately designated them as cash flow hedges in accordance with Topic 815. The purpose of these interest rate swap agreements is to attempt to hedge potential changes to our cash flows due to the variable interest nature of our senior secured term loan facilities. The total notional amount of these interest rate swap agreements is $400.0 million, with $200.0 million expiring in October 2017 and $200.0 million expiring in September 2019. There was no significant hedge ineffectiveness for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. As of June 30, 2014, the fair values of these interest rate swap agreements were reflected as a $30.3 million liability and were included in other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report.
67
The estimated fair value of our senior secured term loans was approximately $666.0 million at June 30, 2014. Based on dealers’ quotes, the estimated fair values of our 5.00% senior notes and 6.625% senior notes were $810.0 million and $372.3 million, respectively, at June 30, 2014.
We utilize sensitivity analyses to assess the potential effect of our variable rate debt. If interest rates were to increase by 10.0% on our outstanding variable rate debt, excluding notes payable on real estate, at June 30, 2014, the net impact of the additional interest cost would be a decrease of $1.9 million on pre-tax income and an increase of $1.9 million on cash used in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2014.
We also have $89.8 million of notes payable on real estate as of June 30, 2014. Interest costs relating to notes payable on real estate include both interest that is expensed and interest that is capitalized as part of the cost of real estate. If interest rates were to increase by 10.0%, our total estimated interest cost related to notes payable would increase by approximately $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014. From time to time, we enter into interest rate swap and cap agreements in order to limit our interest expense related to our notes payable on real estate. If any of these agreements are not designated as effective hedges, then they are marked to market each period with the change in fair value recognized in current period earnings. The net impact on our earnings resulting from gains and/or losses on interest rate swap and cap agreements associated with notes payable on real estate has not been significant.
We also enter into loan commitments that relate to the origination or acquisition of commercial mortgage loans that will be held for resale. FASB ASC Topic 815 requires that these commitments be recorded at their fair values as derivatives. The net impact on our financial position and earnings resulting from these derivatives contracts has not been significant.
Our policy for disclosure controls and procedures provides guidance on the evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures and is designed to ensure that all corporate disclosure is complete and accurate in all material respects and that all information required to be disclosed in the periodic reports submitted by us under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods and in the manner specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Our Disclosure Committee consisting of the principal accounting officer, general counsel, chief communication officer, senior officers of each significant business line and other select employees assisted the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer in this evaluation. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as required by the Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(c) as of the end of the period covered by this report.
No changes in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
68
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
There have been no material changes to our legal proceedings as previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
There have been no material changes to our risk factors as previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
We may repurchase shares awarded to grant recipients under our various equity compensation plans to satisfy minimum statutory federal, state and local tax withholding obligations arising from the vesting of their equity awards. The following table presents information with respect to the repurchased shares relating thereto during each calendar month within the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2014:
Period
April 1, 2014 – April 30, 2014
May 1, 2014 – May 31, 2014
June 1, 2014 – June 30, 2014
Total
ExhibitNo.
Exhibit Description
69
70
In the foregoing description of exhibits, references to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. are to CBRE Group, Inc., references to CB Richard Ellis Services, Inc. are to CBRE Services, Inc., and references to CB Richard Ellis, Inc. are to CBRE, Inc., in each case, prior to their respective name changes, which became effective October 3, 2011.
+ Denotes a management contract or compensatory arrangement
71
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
James R. Groch
Gil Borok
72