Cognex - 10-Q quarterly report FY

 

 

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ                    No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Large accelerated filer þ     Accelerated filer o     Non-accelerated filer o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o                    No þ

     As of October 29, 2006, there were 44,589,706 shares of Common Stock, $.002 par value, of the registrant outstanding.

 

 

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

(In thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

(In thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.

(In thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

As permitted by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission applicable to Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, these notes are condensed and do not contain all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles. Reference should be made to the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

In the opinion of the management of Cognex Corporation, the accompanying consolidated unaudited financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of only normal, recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position at October 1, 2006, and the results of its operations for the three-month and nine-month periods ended October 1, 2006 and October 2, 2005, and changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the periods presented.

The results disclosed in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three-month and nine-month periods ended October 1, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” which is an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN No. 48 (“Interpretation”) clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. The Interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. FIN No. 48 will require disclosure at the end of the annual reporting period of the nature of uncertain tax positions and related events if it is reasonably possible that those positions and events could change the associated recognized tax benefit within the next twelve months. In addition, a quantitative range of any reasonably possible change and open tax years in major jurisdictions will need to be disclosed. The Company will adopt FIN No. 48 beginning in the first quarter of 2007, and has not yet determined the impact of adopting the Interpretation on its consolidated financial statements.

Cash, cash equivalents, and investments consisted of the following (in thousands):

On June 30, 2000, Cognex Corporation became a Limited Partner in Venrock Associates III, L.P., a venture capital fund. A director of the Company is a Managing General Partner of Venrock Associates. The Company has committed to a total investment in the limited partnership of up to $22,500,000 through December 31, 2010.

As of October 1, 2006, the Company had contributed $18,463,000 to the partnership. During the nine months ended October 1, 2006, the Company made $1,013,000 in contributions to the partnership, of which $563,000 was contributed in the quarter ended October 1, 2006. In addition, a distribution of $450,000 was received from the partnership that was accounted for as a return of capital in the quarter ended April 2, 2006. At October 1, 2006, the carrying value of this investment was $10,946,000 compared to an estimated fair value, as determined by the General Partner, of $11,468,000.

Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):

In the fourth quarter of 2001, the Company recorded a $16,300,000 charge in “Cost of product revenue” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for excess inventories and purchase commitments resulting from an extended slowdown in the semiconductor and electronics industries, as well as the expected transition to newer Cognex hardware platforms by the Company’s OEM customers. A total of $12,500,000 of this charge represented reserves against existing inventories and was accordingly included in “Inventories” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The remaining $3,800,000 of the charge represented commitments to purchase excess components and systems from various suppliers and accordingly was included in “Accrued Expenses” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

A favorable settlement of the remaining purchase commitments would result in a recovery of a portion of the remaining $1,400,000 accrued at October 1, 2006.

Amortized intangible assets consisted of the following (in thousands):

The cost and related accumulated amortization of certain fully-amortized completed technologies totaling $2,369,000 were removed from the accounts during the quarter ended April 2, 2006. Aggregate amortization expense for the three-month and nine-month periods ended October 1, 2006 was $1,487,000 and $4,406,000, respectively, and $1,418,000 and $2,868,000 for the same periods in 2005.

Estimated amortization expense for the remainder of the current fiscal year and succeeding fiscal years is as follows (in thousands):

The Company has two reporting units with goodwill, the Modular Vision Systems Division (MVSD) and the Surface Inspection Systems Division (SISD), which are also reportable segments.

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during the nine-month period ended October 1, 2006 were as follows (in thousands):

On May 20, 2006, the Company acquired Assistware Technology. The allocation of the purchase price is subject to adjustment through the second quarter of 2007.

The Company warrants its hardware products to be free from defects in material and workmanship for periods ranging from six months to two years from the time of sale based upon the product being purchased and the terms of the customer’s contract. Estimated warranty obligations are evaluated and recorded at the time of sale based upon historical costs to fulfill warranty obligations. Provisions may also be recorded subsequent to the time of sale whenever specific events or circumstances impacting product quality become known that would not have been taken into account using historical data. Warranty obligations are included in “Accrued Expenses” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The changes in the warranty obligation were as follows (in thousands):

Except as limited by Massachusetts law, the by-laws of the Company require it to indemnify certain current or former directors, officers, and employees of the Company against expenses incurred by them in connection with each proceeding in which he or she is involved as a result of serving or having served in certain capacities. Indemnification is not available with respect to a proceeding as to which it has been adjudicated that the person did not act in good faith in the reasonable belief that the action was in the best interests of the Company. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these provisions is unlimited. The Company has never incurred significant costs related to these indemnification provisions. As a result, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these provisions is minimal.

The Company accepts standard limited indemnification provisions in the ordinary course of business, whereby it indemnifies its customers for certain direct damages incurred in connection with third-party patent or other intellectual property infringement claims with respect to the use of the Company’s products. The term of these indemnification provisions generally coincides with the customer’s use of the Company’s products. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these provisions is subject to fixed monetary limits. The Company has never incurred significant costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification provisions. As a result, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these provisions is minimal.

The Company also accepts limited indemnification provisions from time to time, whereby it indemnifies customers for certain direct damages incurred in connection with bodily injury and property damage arising from the installation of the Company’s products. The term of these indemnification provisions generally coincides with the period of installation. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these provisions is limited and is likely recoverable under the Company’s insurance policies. As a result of this coverage, and the fact that the Company has never incurred significant costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification provisions, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these provisions is minimal.

On March 20, 2006, the Company provided standby letters of credit totaling 3,359,825,000 Yen (or approximately $28,444,000 based upon the exchange rate at October 1, 2006) to taxing authorities in Japan that are collateralized by investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Tokyo Regional Taxation Bureau (TRTB) asserted that Cognex Corporation had a permanent establishment in Japan that would require certain income, previously reported on U.S. tax returns for the years ended December 31, 1997 through December 31, 2001, to be subject instead to taxation in Japan. In September 2003, the Company filed a request with the Internal Revenue Service Tax Treaty Division for competent authority assistance.

During the three-month period ended October 1, 2006, the Company reached an agreement with the TRTB through the competent authority proceedings. The agreement resulted in an adjustment of the intercompany transfer price between the US parent and its Japanese subsidiary. The resulting additional tax to be paid to the TRTB, net of refunds due from US tax authorities, resulted in increased tax expense of $1,058,000 during the quarter.

During the three-month period ended October 1, 2006, the Company also recorded a $1,220,000 reduction in tax expense resulting from the expiration of the statute of limitations on an open tax year, and a $405,000 reduction resulting from the true-up of the tax provision recorded in 2005 as compared to the actual tax returns as filed. The three-month period ended July 2, 2006 included a reduction of tax expense of $869,000 from the settlement of a multi-year state tax audit during the quarter.

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment,” which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” SFAS No. 123R requires companies to recognize compensation expense for all share-based payments to employees at fair value. Recognizing compensation expense using the intrinsic value based method described in Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and disclosing the pro-forma impact of using the fair value based method described in SFAS No. 123 is no longer an alternative.

SFAS No. 123R was adopted by the Company on January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective method in which compensation expense is recognized beginning on the effective date. Under this transition method, compensation expense recognized for the nine-month period ended October 1, 2006 includes: (1) compensation expense for all share-based payments granted prior to but not yet vested as of December 31, 2005, based on the grant-date fair value estimated under SFAS No. 123, and (2) compensation expense for all share-based payments granted subsequent to December 31, 2005, based on the grant-date fair value estimated under SFAS No. 123R. In accordance with the modified prospective method, the Company’s results of operations and financial position have not been restated.

The Company’s share-based payments that result in compensation expense consist solely of stock option grants. At October 1, 2006, the Company had 10,827,520 shares available for grant under three stock option plans: the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, 3,323,520; the 1998 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, 4,000; and the 2001 General Stock Option Plan, 7,500,000. Each of these plans expire ten years from the date the plan was approved. The Company has not granted any stock options from the 2001 General Stock Option Plan.

On April 21, 1998, the shareholders approved the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, under which the Company initially was able to grant stock options and stock awards to purchase up to 1,700,000 shares of common stock. Effective January 1, 1999 and each January 1^st thereafter during the term of the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, the number of shares of common stock available for grants of stock options and stock awards is increased automatically by an amount equal to 4.5% of the total number of issued shares of common stock as of the close of business on December 31^st of the preceding year.

Stock options are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of the Company’s common stock at the grant date, generally vest over four years based on continuous service, and generally expire ten years from the grant date.

A summary of the Company’s stock option activity for the nine-month period ended October 1, 2006 was as follows (shares and values in thousands):

Historically, the majority of the Company’s stock options have been granted during the first quarter of each year to reward existing employees for their performance. In addition, the Company grants stock options throughout the year for new employees and promotions.

The fair values of stock options granted after January 1, 2006 were estimated on the grant date using a binomial lattice model with the assistance of an outside valuation advisor. The fair values of options granted prior to January 1, 2006 were estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model for footnote disclosure under SFAS No. 123. The Company believes that a binomial lattice model results in a better estimate of fair value because it identifies patterns of exercises based on triggering events, tying the results to possible future events instead of a single path of actual historical events.

The fair values of stock options granted in each period presented were estimated using the following weighted-average assumptions:

The risk-free rate was based on a treasury instrument whose term was consistent with the contractual term of the option for 2006 grants, and the expected term of the option for 2005 grants.

The current dividend yield is calculated by annualizing the cash dividend declared by the Company’s Board of Directors for the current quarter and dividing that result by the closing stock price on the grant date. Although dividends are declared at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors, for this purpose, the Company anticipates continuing to pay a quarterly dividend that approximates the current dividend yield.

The expected volatility for 2006 grants was based on a combination of historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over the contractual term of the option and implied volatility for traded options of the Company’s stock. The expected volatility for 2005 grants was based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over the expected term of the option.

The weighted-average grant-date fair value of stock options granted during the nine-month periods ended October 1, 2006 and October 2, 2005 was $11.03 and $5.98, respectively. The Company recognizes compensation expense using the graded attribution method, in which expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the service period for each separately vesting portion of the stock option as if the option was, in substance, multiple awards.

The amount of compensation expense recognized at the end of the vesting period is based on the number of stock options for which the requisite service has been completed. No compensation expense is recognized for options that are forfeited for which the employee does not render the requisite service. The term “forfeitures” is distinct from “expirations” and represents only the unvested portion of the surrendered option. The Company currently expects that approximately 62% of its stock options will actually vest, and therefore, has applied a weighted-average annual forfeiture rate of 11% to all unvested options. This rate will be revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from this estimate. Ultimately, compensation expense will only be recognized over the vesting period for those options that actually vest. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for actual forfeitures as they occur for footnote disclosure under SFAS No. 123.

The total stock-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefit recognized for the nine-month period ended October 1, 2006 was $9,936,000 and $3,491,000, respectively. The total stock-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefit recognized for the three-month period ended October 1, 2006 was $3,475,000 and $1,222,000, respectively. No compensation expense was capitalized at October 1, 2006. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company recognized compensation expense using the intrinsic value based method described in APB Opinion No. 25, and accordingly, no compensation expense was recorded since stock options were granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of the Company’s common stock at the grant date. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised for the nine-month periods ended October 1, 2006 and October 2, 2005 was $3,410,000 and $13,289,000, respectively.

At October 1, 2006, total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock options was $14,622,000, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years.

The following table details the effect on net income and net income per share had stock-based compensation expense been recorded against income for the three-month and nine-month periods ended October 2, 2005 using the fair value based method described in SFAS No. 123. The reported and pro-forma net income and net income per share for the three-month and nine-month periods ended October 1, 2006 are the same since stock-based compensation expense was recorded under the provisions of SFAS No. 123R.

Net income per share was calculated as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts) :

Stock options to purchase 7,763,085 and 5,521,344 shares of common stock were outstanding during the three-month and nine-month periods ended October 1, 2006, respectively, and 1,586,491 and 4,151,139 for the same periods in 2005, but were not included in the calculation of diluted net income per common share because they were anti-dilutive.

The Company has two reportable segments: the Modular Vision Systems Division (MVSD) and the Surface Inspections Systems Division (SISD). MVSD designs, develops, manufactures, and markets modular vision systems that are used to control the manufacturing of discrete items by locating, identifying, inspecting, and measuring them during the manufacturing process. SISD designs, develops, manufactures, and markets surface inspection vision systems that are used to inspect surfaces of materials that are processed in a continuous fashion to ensure there are no flaws or defects in the surfaces. Segments are determined based upon the way that management organizes its business for making operating decisions and assessing performance. The Company evaluates segment performance based upon income or loss from operations, excluding unusual items and stock-based compensation expense.

The following table summarizes information about the Company’s segments (in thousands):

Reconciling items consist of stock-based compensation expense and unallocated corporate expenses, which primarily include corporate headquarters costs and professional fees. For the nine-month period ended October 1, 2006, corporate expenses also included costs associated with the Company’s 25^th Anniversary party. Asset information by segment is not produced internally for use by the chief operating decision maker, and therefore, is not presented. Asset information is not provided because the cash and investments are commingled and the divisions share assets and resources in a number of locations around the world.

On May 20, 2006, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Assistware Technology, a privately-held developer of Lane Departure Warning Systems for $2,998,000 in cash paid at closing, with the potential for an additional cash payment of up to $2,000,000 depending upon the achievement of certain performance criteria. The $2,998,000 initial purchase price consisted of $2,848,000 in cash consideration and $150,000 in transaction costs. The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, Assistware’s results of operations have been included in the Company’s consolidated results of operations since the date of acquisition. The historical results of operations of the acquired business were not material compared to the consolidated results of operations of the Company, and therefore, pro forma results are not presented.

With the acquisition of Assistware, the Company has entered the emerging market for machine vision systems in vehicles. These highly-specialized sensors are installed in vehicles, ranging from long-haul trucks to passenger cars, where they provide driver assistance by constantly analyzing the vehicle’s external environment and warning the driver of potentially dangerous situations. Assistware’s Lane Departure Warning System uses machine vision technology to watch the road ahead and alert drivers if they unintentionally leave their lane or if their driving pattern becomes erratic.

The Company adjusted the purchase price allocation during the third quarter of 2006, which resulted in a $33,000 increase in accounts receivable, a $10,000 decrease in goodwill, and a $23,000 increase in accrued expenses. The purchase price was allocated as follows (in thousands):

The contingent payments will be recorded as additional purchase price and allocated to goodwill when and if paid. The goodwill is assigned to the MVSD segment. None of the acquired intangible assets, including goodwill, are deductible for tax purposes. The Company obtained third-party valuations of the acquired intangible assets. The allocation of the purchase price is subject to adjustment through the second quarter of 2007.

On May 9, 2005, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of DVT Corporation, a provider of low-cost, easy-to-use vision sensors, for approximately $111,607,000, net of $4,702,000 cash acquired. The purchase price consisted of $110,346,000 in cash paid at closing (net of acquired cash) and $1,261,000 in transaction costs.

The Company adjusted the purchase price allocation during the second quarter of 2006, which resulted in a $281,000 increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets, a $9,000 increase in other assets, a $298,000 decrease in goodwill, and an $8,000 decrease in accrued expenses. The final purchase price was allocated as follows (in thousands):

On March 31, 2003, the Company acquired the wafer identification business of Siemens Dematic AG for 7,000,000 Euros in cash (or approximately $7,630,000) paid at closing, with the potential for an additional cash payment of up to 1,700,000 Euros (or approximately $2,013,000) depending upon the achievement of certain performance criteria. During the second quarter of 2006, the Company determined that a portion of this contingent payment had been earned and made a payment of 149,000 Euros (or approximately $190,000) that was allocated to goodwill.

On July 27, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.085 per share. The dividend was paid on August 23, 2006 to all shareholders of record at the close of business on August 11, 2006.

On October 26, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.085 per share. The dividend is payable on November 24, 2006 to all shareholders of record at the close of business on November 10, 2006. Future dividends will be declared at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend upon such factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant.

Certain statements made in this report, as well as oral statements made by the Company from time to time, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Readers can identify these forward-looking statements by the Company’s use of the words “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “believes,” “projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “will,” “may,” “shall,” and similar words and other statements of a similar sense. These statements are based upon the Company’s current estimates and expectations as to prospective events and circumstances, which may or may not be in the Company’s control and as to which there can be no firm assurances given. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Such risks and uncertainties include: (1) global economic conditions that impact the capital spending trends of manufacturers in a variety of industries; (2) the cyclicality of the semiconductor and electronics industries; (3) the inability to achieve significant international revenue; (4) fluctuations in foreign exchange rates; (5) the loss of, or a significant curtailment of purchases by, any one or more principal customers; (6) the reliance upon certain sole-source suppliers to manufacture and deliver critical components for the Company’s products; (7) the inability to attract and retain skilled employees; (8) the inability to design and manufacture high-quality products; (9) inaccurate forecasts of customer demand; (10) the technological obsolescence of current products and the inability to develop new products; (11) the inability to protect the Company’s proprietary technology and intellectual property; (12) the Company’s involvement in time-consuming and costly litigation; (13) the impact of competitive pressures; (14) the challenges in integrating acquired businesses; and (15) the inability to achieve expected results from acquisitions. The foregoing list should not be construed as exhaustive and the Company encourages readers to refer to the detailed discussion of risk factors included in Part I — Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005. The

Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance upon any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. The Company disclaims any obligation to subsequently revise forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date such statements are made.

Cognex Corporation designs, develops, manufactures, and markets machine vision systems, or computers that can “see,” which are used to automate a wide range of manufacturing processes where vision is required. The Company’s Modular Vision Systems Division (MVSD) specializes in machine vision systems that are used to automate the manufacture of discrete items, while the Company’s Surface Inspection Systems Division (SISD) specializes in machine vision systems that are used to inspect the surfaces of materials processed in a continuous fashion.

In addition to product revenue derived from the sale of machine vision systems, the Company also generates revenue by providing maintenance and support, education, consulting, and installation services to its customers. The Company’s customers can be classified into three categories: semiconductor and electronics capital equipment manufacturers, discrete factory automation, and surface inspection customers. Semiconductor and electronics capital equipment manufacturers purchase Cognex machine vision systems and integrate them into the capital equipment that they manufacture and then sell to their customers in the semiconductor and electronics industries that either make computer chips or make printed circuit boards containing computer chips. Although the Company sells to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) in a number of industries, these semiconductor and electronics OEMs have historically been large consumers of the Company’s products. Discrete manufacturers in the factory automation area include a wide array of manufacturers who use machine vision for applications in a variety of industries, including the automotive, consumer electronics, food and beverage, healthcare, and pharmaceutical industries. The majority of these customers are end users who purchase Cognex machine vision systems and install them directly on their production lines. The last category, surface inspection customers, includes manufacturers of materials processed in a continuous fashion, such as paper and metals.

On May 20, 2006, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Assistware Technology, a privately-held developer of Lane Departure Warning Systems for $2,998,000 in cash paid at closing, with the potential for an additional cash payment of up to $2,000,000 depending upon the achievement of certain performance criteria. Assistware’s results of operations for the period since the date of acquisition, as well as the amortization of acquired intangible assets, were not material to the Company’s consolidated results of operations.

With the acquisition of Assistware, the Company has entered the emerging market for machine vision systems in vehicles. These highly-specialized sensors are installed in vehicles, ranging from long-haul trucks to passenger cars, where they provide driver assistance by constantly analyzing the vehicle’s external environment and warning the driver of potentially dangerous situations. Assistware’s Lane Departure Warning System uses machine vision technology to watch the road ahead and alert drivers if they unintentionally leave their lane or if their driving pattern becomes erratic. The Company believes that entering this new market for machine visions systems is an important strategic move as the Company seeks to diversify into areas outside of the factory floor.

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment,” which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” SFAS No. 123R requires companies to recognize compensation expense for all share-based payments to employees at fair value.

SFAS No. 123R was adopted by the Company on January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective method in which compensation expense is recognized beginning on the effective date. Under this transition method, compensation expense recognized for the nine-month period ended October 1, 2006 includes: (1) compensation expense for all share-based payments granted prior to but not yet vested as

18