Companies:
10,652
total market cap:
$139.529 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ USD
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
Columbia Banking System
COLB
#2141
Rank
$9.36 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
$31.30
Share price
-0.60%
Change (1 day)
17.32%
Change (1 year)
๐ฆ Banks
๐ณ Financial services
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Stock Splits
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Annual Reports (10-K)
Columbia Banking System
Quarterly Reports (10-Q)
Financial Year FY2014 Q2
Columbia Banking System - 10-Q quarterly report FY2014 Q2
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
________________________________________________________
FORM 10-Q
________________________________________________________
(Mark One)
ý
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2014
.
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number 0-20288
________________________________________________________
COLUMBIA BANKING SYSTEM, INC.
(Exact name of issuer as specified in its charter)
________________________________________________________
Washington
91-1422237
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
1301 “A” Street
Tacoma, Washington
98402-2156
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(253) 305-1900
(Issuer’s telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
________________________________________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
ý
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
ý
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
ý
Accelerated filer
¨
Non-accelerated filer
¨
Smaller reporting company
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
¨
No
ý
The number of shares of common stock outstanding at July 31, 2014 wa
s 52,651,886.
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Financial Statements (unaudited)
Consolidated Balance Sheets - June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013
1
Consolidated Statements of Income - three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013
2
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income - three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013
3
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity - six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013
4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013
5
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
6
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
38
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
60
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
60
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
61
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
61
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
61
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
61
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
61
Item 5.
Other Information
61
Item 6.
Exhibits
62
Signatures
63
i
Table of Contents
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Columbia Banking System, Inc.
(Unaudited)
June 30,
2014
December 31,
2013
ASSETS
(in thousands)
Cash and due from banks
$
193,816
$
165,030
Interest-earning deposits with banks
30,646
14,531
Total cash and cash equivalents
224,462
179,561
Securities available for sale at fair value (amortized cost of $1,581,989 and $1,680,491, respectively)
1,590,017
1,664,111
Federal Home Loan Bank stock at cost
31,912
32,529
Loans held for sale
750
735
Loans, excluding covered loans, net of unearned income of ($57,126) and ($68,282), respectively
4,452,674
4,219,451
Less: allowance for loan and lease losses
49,494
52,280
Loans, excluding covered loans, net
4,403,180
4,167,171
Covered loans, net of allowance for loan losses of ($19,801) and ($20,174), respectively
242,100
277,671
Total loans, net
4,645,280
4,444,842
FDIC loss-sharing asset
27,981
39,846
Interest receivable
22,183
22,206
Premises and equipment, net
156,645
154,732
Other real estate owned ($13,051 and $12,093 covered by FDIC loss-share, respectively)
28,254
35,927
Goodwill
343,952
343,952
Other intangible assets, net
22,792
25,852
Other assets
203,230
217,289
Total assets
$
7,297,458
$
7,161,582
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing
$
2,190,161
$
2,171,703
Interest-bearing
3,794,908
3,787,772
Total deposits
5,985,069
5,959,475
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
110,587
36,606
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
25,000
25,000
Other liabilities
84,651
87,252
Total liabilities
6,205,307
6,108,333
Commitments and contingent liabilities
Shareholders’ equity:
June 30,
2014
December 31,
2013
Preferred stock (no par value)
(in thousands)
Authorized shares
2,000
2,000
Issued and outstanding
9
9
2,217
2,217
Common stock (no par value)
Authorized shares
63,033
63,033
Issued and outstanding
52,635
51,265
861,609
860,562
Retained earnings
224,765
202,514
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
3,560
(12,044
)
Total shareholders’ equity
1,092,151
1,053,249
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
$
7,297,458
$
7,161,582
See accompanying Notes to unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Columbia Banking System, Inc.
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
June 30,
June 30,
2014
2013 (1)
2014
2013 (1)
(in thousands except per share amounts)
Interest Income
Loans
$
67,004
$
74,837
$
132,545
$
122,865
Taxable securities
6,382
4,890
13,134
9,124
Tax-exempt securities
2,671
2,508
5,289
4,806
Federal funds sold and deposits in banks
30
33
44
234
Total interest income
76,087
82,268
151,012
137,029
Interest Expense
Deposits
729
1,054
1,481
2,143
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
115
(699
)
229
(628
)
Prepayment charge on Federal Home Loan Bank advances
—
1,548
—
1,548
Other borrowings
119
376
238
495
Total interest expense
963
2,279
1,948
3,558
Net Interest Income
75,124
79,989
149,064
133,471
Provision for loan and lease losses
600
2,000
100
1,000
Provision (recapture) for losses on covered loans, net
1,517
(1,712
)
3,939
(732
)
Net interest income after provision (recapture) for loan and lease losses
73,007
79,701
145,025
133,203
Noninterest Income
Service charges and other fees
13,790
13,560
26,726
21,154
Merchant services fees
2,040
2,013
3,910
3,864
Investment securities gains, net
296
92
519
462
Bank owned life insurance
976
1,008
1,941
1,706
Change in FDIC loss-sharing asset
(5,050
)
(13,137
)
(9,869
)
(23,620
)
Other
2,575
3,272
5,408
4,900
Total noninterest income
14,627
6,808
28,635
8,466
Noninterest Expense
Compensation and employee benefits
31,064
35,657
62,402
57,310
Occupancy
8,587
7,543
16,831
12,296
Merchant processing
998
852
1,978
1,709
Advertising and promotion
950
1,160
1,719
2,030
Data processing and communications
3,680
3,638
7,200
6,218
Legal and professional fees
2,303
5,504
4,472
7,554
Taxes, licenses and fees
1,051
1,204
2,231
2,591
Regulatory premiums
1,073
1,177
2,249
2,034
Net cost (benefit) of operation of other real estate owned
(97
)
(2,828
)
49
(5,329
)
Amortization of intangibles
1,480
1,693
3,060
2,722
Other (1)
6,675
8,904
12,959
13,418
Total noninterest expense
57,764
64,504
115,150
102,553
Income before income taxes
29,870
22,005
58,510
39,116
Income tax provision
8,643
7,414
17,439
12,349
Net Income
$
21,227
$
14,591
$
41,071
$
26,767
Earnings per common share
Basic
$
0.40
$
0.28
$
0.79
$
0.59
Diluted
$
0.40
$
0.28
$
0.77
$
0.58
Dividends paid per common share
$
0.24
$
0.10
$
0.36
$
0.20
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
52,088
50,788
51,600
45,099
Weighted average number of diluted common shares outstanding
52,494
52,125
52,463
45,758
__________
(1) Reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation. The reclassification was limited to removing the separate line item for FDIC clawback liability expense within noninterest expense and including the prior period activity in the line item for other noninterest expense.
See accompanying Notes to unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Columbia Banking System, Inc.
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
June 30,
2014
2013
(in thousands)
Net income as reported
$
21,227
$
14,591
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Unrealized gain (loss) from securities:
Net unrealized holding gain (loss) from available for sale securities arising during the period, net of tax of ($4,992) and $14,116
8,768
(25,930
)
Reclassification adjustment of net gain from sale of available for sale securities included in income, net of tax of $107 and $33
(189
)
(59
)
Net unrealized gain (loss) from securities, net of reclassification adjustment
8,579
(25,989
)
Pension plan liability adjustment:
Amortization of unrecognized net actuarial loss included in net periodic pension cost, net of tax of ($13) and ($32)
24
60
Pension plan liability adjustment, net
24
60
Other comprehensive income (loss)
8,603
(25,929
)
Total comprehensive income (loss)
$
29,830
$
(11,338
)
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2014
2013
(in thousands)
Net income as reported
$
41,071
$
26,767
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Unrealized gain (loss) from securities:
Net unrealized holding gain (loss) from available for sale securities arising during the period, net of tax of ($9,041) and $15,473
15,887
(28,423
)
Reclassification adjustment of net gain from sale of available for sale securities included in income, net of tax of $188 and $163
(331
)
(299
)
Net unrealized gain (loss) from securities, net of reclassification adjustment
15,556
(28,722
)
Pension plan liability adjustment:
Net unrealized loss from unfunded defined benefit plan liability arising during the period, net of tax of $0 and $412
—
(756
)
Amortization of unrecognized net actuarial loss included in net periodic pension cost, net of tax of ($26) and ($65)
48
119
Pension plan liability adjustment, net
48
(637
)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
15,604
(29,359
)
Total comprehensive income (loss)
$
56,675
$
(2,592
)
See accompanying Notes to unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Columbia Banking System, Inc.
(Unaudited)
Preferred Stock
Common Stock
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
Shareholders’
Equity
Number of
Shares
Amount
Number of
Shares
Amount
(in thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2013
—
$
—
39,686
$
581,471
$
162,388
$
20,149
$
764,008
Net income
—
—
—
—
26,767
—
26,767
Other comprehensive loss
—
—
—
—
—
(29,359
)
(29,359
)
Issuance of preferred stock, common stock and warrants
9
2,217
11,380
273,964
—
—
276,181
Activity in deferred compensation plan
—
—
—
517
—
—
517
Issuance of common stock - stock option and other plans
—
—
43
774
—
—
774
Issuance of common stock - restricted stock awards, net of canceled awards
—
—
144
1,280
—
—
1,280
Purchase and retirement of common stock
—
—
(16
)
(391
)
—
—
(391
)
Preferred dividends
—
—
—
—
(10
)
—
(10
)
Cash dividends paid on common stock
—
—
—
—
(9,093
)
—
(9,093
)
Balance at June 30, 2013
9
$
2,217
51,237
$
857,615
$
180,052
$
(9,210
)
$
1,030,674
Balance at January 1, 2014
9
$
2,217
51,265
$
860,562
$
202,514
$
(12,044
)
$
1,053,249
Net income
—
—
—
—
41,071
—
41,071
Other comprehensive income
—
—
—
—
—
15,604
15,604
Issuance of common stock - cashless exercise of warrants
—
—
1,140
—
—
—
—
Activity in deferred compensation plan
—
—
—
(1
)
—
—
(1
)
Issuance of common stock - stock option and other plans
—
—
21
425
—
—
425
Issuance of common stock - restricted stock awards, net of canceled awards
—
—
233
1,224
—
—
1,224
Purchase and retirement of common stock
—
—
(24
)
(601
)
—
—
(601
)
Preferred dividends
—
—
—
—
(37
)
—
(37
)
Cash dividends paid on common stock
—
—
—
—
(18,783
)
—
(18,783
)
Balance at June 30, 2014
9
$
2,217
52,635
$
861,609
$
224,765
$
3,560
$
1,092,151
See accompanying Notes to unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Columbia Banking System, Inc.
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30,
2014
2013
(in thousands)
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net Income
$
41,071
$
26,767
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
Provision for loan and lease losses on noncovered and covered loans
4,039
268
Stock-based compensation expense
1,224
1,280
Depreciation, amortization and accretion
17,057
22,527
Investment securities gain, net
(519
)
(462
)
Net realized (gain) loss on sale of other assets
453
(73
)
Net realized gain on sale of other real estate owned
(2,972
)
(6,291
)
Write-down on other real estate owned
2,554
664
Net change in:
Loans held for sale
(15
)
413
Interest receivable
23
(8,850
)
Interest payable
(20
)
(12
)
Other assets
3,062
6,285
Other liabilities
(2,589
)
(12,662
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
63,368
29,854
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Loans originated and acquired, net of principal collected
(201,162
)
(194,322
)
Purchases of:
Securities available for sale
(22,804
)
(162,018
)
Premises and equipment
(8,383
)
(8,071
)
Proceeds from:
FDIC reimbursement on loss-sharing asset
3,982
6,387
Sales of securities available for sale
30,704
166,881
Principal repayments and maturities of securities available for sale
83,788
167,736
Sales of other assets
1,095
806
Sales of covered other real estate owned
5,634
13,814
Sales of other real estate and other personal property owned
10,298
6,076
Payments to FDIC related to loss-sharing asset
(2,217
)
—
Acquisition of intangible assets
—
(913
)
Net cash paid in acquisition
—
(154,170
)
Other investing activities
—
(1,026
)
Net cash used in investing activities
(99,065
)
(158,820
)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Net increase (decrease) in deposits
25,594
(177,631
)
Proceeds from:
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
1,168,000
756,100
Federal Reserve Bank borrowings
50
50
Exercise of stock options
425
774
Payments for:
Repayment of Federal Home Loan Bank advances
(1,094,000
)
(711,000
)
Repayment of Federal Reserve Bank borrowings
(50
)
(50
)
Common stock dividends
(18,783
)
(9,093
)
Preferred stock dividends
(37
)
(10
)
Repayment of long-term subordinated debt
—
(51,000
)
Purchase and retirement of common stock
(601
)
(391
)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
80,598
(192,251
)
Increase (Decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
44,901
(321,217
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
179,561
513,926
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
224,462
$
192,709
Supplemental Information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Cash paid for interest
$
1,968
$
2,155
Cash paid for income tax
$
8,200
$
9,589
Non-cash investing and financing activities
Loans transferred to other real estate owned
$
7,841
$
9,307
Share-based consideration issued for acquisitions
$
—
$
276,181
See accompanying Notes to unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Table of Contents
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Columbia Banking System, Inc.
1.
Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The interim unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Columbia Banking System, Inc. (“we”, “our”, “Columbia” or the “Company”) and its subsidiaries, including its wholly owned banking subsidiary Columbia State Bank (“Columbia Bank” or the “Bank”) and West Coast Trust Company, Inc. (“West Coast Trust”). All intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented have been included. The results of operations for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
are not necessarily indicative of results to be anticipated for the year ending
December 31, 2014
. The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes contained in the Company’s
2013
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Due to the timing of the acquisition of West Coast Bancorp (“West Coast”), our results of operations for the six month period ended June 30, 2014 include the acquisition for the full six month period, however the prior year period only includes the acquisition for three months of the six month period. See Note 3, Business Combinations, for further information regarding this acquisition.
Significant Accounting Policies
The significant accounting policies used in preparation of our consolidated financial statements are disclosed in our
2013
Annual Report on Form 10-K. There have not been any changes in our significant accounting policies compared to those contained in our
2013
Form 10-K disclosure for the year ended
December 31, 2013
.
2.
Accounting Pronouncements Recently Issued
In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-12,
Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Services Period
. The amendments in ASU 2014-12 provide guidance for determining compensation cost under specific circumstances when an employee is eligible to vest in an award regardless of whether the employee is rendering service on the date the performance target is achieved. ASU 2014-12 becomes effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015 with early adoption permitted. As of June 30, 2014, the Company did not have any share-based payment awards that include performance targets that could be achieved after the requisite service period. As such, the adoption of ASU No. 2014-12 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-11,
Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures
. The amendments in ASU 2014-11
change the accounting for repurchase-to-maturity transactions and linked repurchase financings to secured borrowing accounting, which is consistent with accounting for other repurchase agreements. Additionally, the amendment requires new disclosures on transfers accounted for as sales in transactions that are economically similar to repurchase agreements and requires increased transparency on collateral pledged in secured borrowings. The amendments in this update will be effective for the first interim or annual period beginning after December 31, 2014, with the exception of the collateral disclosures which will be effective for interim periods beginning after March 15, 2015. Early application is not permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements, but does not expect t
he guidance to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-04 No. 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
. The guidance in this update supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance throughout the industry topics of the codification. For public companies, this update will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements, but does not expect the guidance to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
In April 2014, the the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08,
Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity.
ASU 2014-08 raises the threshold for a disposal to qualify as a discontinued operation and requires new disclosures of both discontinued operations and certain other disposals that do not meet the definition of a discontinued operation. It is effective for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted but only for disposals that have not been reported in financial statements previously issued. The Company is assessing the impact of the new guidance on its consolidated financial statements.
In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-04,
Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans Upon Foreclosure
. The Update clarifies when a creditor would be considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan such that all or a portion of the loan would be derecognized and the real estate property recognized. Under the guidance, a consumer loan collateralized by residential real estate should be reclassified to other real estate owned when (1) the creditor obtains legal title to the residential property or (2) the borrower conveys all interest in the property to the creditor to satisfy the loan by completing a deed in lieu of foreclosure or similar agreement. In addition, an entity is required to disclose the amount of residential real estate meeting the conditions above, and the recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans secured by residential real estate that are in the process of foreclosure. ASU 2014-04 is effective for annual and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. Adoption of the new guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-01,
Accounting for Investments in Qualified Affordable Housing Projects.
The Update provides guidance on accounting for investments by a reporting entity in flow-through limited liability entities that manage or invest in affordable housing projects that qualify for the low-income housing tax credit. The amendments in this Update permit the reporting entity to make an accounting policy election to account for its investments in qualified affordable housing projects using the proportional amortization method if certain conditions are met. Under the proportional amortization method, the cost of the investment is amortized each reporting period in proportion to the tax credits received. Under the new guidance, classification of the amortization would change from noninterest expense to income tax expense. ASU 2014-01 is effective for annual and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. The guidance is to be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. The Company is assessing the impact of the new guidance on its consolidated financial statements.
3.
Business Combinations
On
April 1, 2013
, the Company completed its acquisition of West Coast. The Company paid
$540.8 million
in total consideration to acquire
100%
of the voting equity interests of West Coast. The primary reason for the acquisition was to expand the Company’s geographic footprint consistent with its ongoing growth strategy. The fair value of the net assets acquired totaled
$312.4 million
, including
$1.88 billion
of deposits,
$1.41 billion
of loans and
$15.3 million
of other intangible assets. Goodwill of
$228.4 million
was recorded as part of the acquisition. The goodwill is not deductible for income tax purposes.
The operating results of the Company include the operating results produced by the acquired assets and assumed liabilities for the period April 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014. Disclosure of the amount of West Coast’s revenue and net income (excluding integration costs) included in Columbia’s consolidated income statement is impracticable due to the integration of the operations and accounting for this acquisition.
7
Table of Contents
The following table presents certain unaudited pro forma information for the six month period ended June 30, 2013, for illustrative purposes only. This unaudited pro forma information was calculated as if West Coast had been acquired as of the beginning of the year prior to the acquisition. The unaudited estimated pro forma information combines the historical results of West Coast with the Company’s consolidated historical results and includes certain adjustments reflecting the estimated impact of certain fair value adjustments for the respective periods. The pro forma information is not indicative of what would have occurred had the acquisition occurred as of the beginning of the year prior to the acquisition. In particular, no adjustments have been made to eliminate the impact of other-than-temporary impairment losses and losses recognized on the sale of securities that may not have been necessary had the investment securities been recorded at fair value as of the beginning of the year prior to the acquisition. The unaudited pro forma information does not consider any changes to the provision for credit losses resulting from recording loan assets at fair value. Additionally, Columbia expects to achieve further operating cost savings and other business synergies, including revenue growth, as a result of the acquisition which are not reflected in the pro forma amounts that follow. As a result, actual amounts would have differed from the unaudited pro forma information presented.
Unaudited Pro Forma
Six Months Ended June 30,
2013
(in thousands)
Total revenues (net interest income plus noninterest income)
$
177,970
Net income
$
43,256
Earnings per share - basic
$
0.85
Earnings per share - diluted
$
0.83
In connection with the West Coast acquisition, Columbia recognized
$672 thousand
and
$9.2 million
of acquisition-related expenses for the
three
month periods ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
, respectively, and
$1.6 million
and
$10.0 million
for the
six
month periods ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
, respectively.
See Note 2, Business Combinations, in Item 8 of our
2013
Form 10-K for additional details related to the West Coast acquisition.
8
Table of Contents
4.
Securities
The following table summarizes the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and the resulting fair value of securities available for sale:
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
(in thousands)
June 30, 2014
U.S. government agency and government-sponsored enterprise mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations
$
862,248
$
11,858
$
(11,488
)
$
862,618
State and municipal securities
368,221
13,783
(1,498
)
380,506
U.S. government agency and government-sponsored enterprise securities
325,341
492
(4,444
)
321,389
U.S. government securities
20,895
1
(559
)
20,337
Other securities
5,284
22
(139
)
5,167
Total
$
1,581,989
$
26,156
$
(18,128
)
$
1,590,017
December 31, 2013
U.S. government agency and government-sponsored enterprise mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations
$
961,442
$
10,640
$
(23,674
)
$
948,408
State and municipal securities
357,013
11,450
(3,993
)
364,470
U.S. government agency and government-sponsored enterprise securities
335,671
434
(10,066
)
326,039
U.S. government securities
21,081
—
(967
)
20,114
Other securities
5,284
27
(231
)
5,080
Total
$
1,680,491
$
22,551
$
(38,931
)
$
1,664,111
The scheduled contractual maturities of investment securities available for sale at
June 30, 2014
are presented as follows:
June 30, 2014
Amortized Cost
Fair Value
(in thousands)
Due within one year
$
21,359
$
21,470
Due after one year through five years
332,516
333,068
Due after five years through ten years
431,423
432,434
Due after ten years
791,407
797,878
Other securities with no stated maturity
5,284
5,167
Total investment securities available-for-sale
$
1,581,989
$
1,590,017
The following table summarizes, as of
June 30, 2014
, the carrying value of securities pledged as collateral to secure public deposits, borrowings and other purposes as permitted or required by law:
Carrying Amount
(in thousands)
Washington and Oregon State to secure public deposits
$
291,729
Federal Reserve Bank to secure borrowings
42,582
Other securities pledged
43,994
Total securities pledged as collateral
$
378,305
9
Table of Contents
The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Company’s investments with unrealized losses that are not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at
June 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
:
Less than 12 Months
12 Months or More
Total
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
(in thousands)
June 30, 2014
U.S. government agency and government-sponsored enterprise mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations
$
70,725
$
(160
)
$
296,832
$
(11,328
)
$
367,557
$
(11,488
)
State and municipal securities
26,340
(101
)
61,424
(1,397
)
87,764
(1,498
)
U.S. government agency and government-sponsored enterprise securities
16,231
(2
)
246,776
(4,442
)
263,007
(4,444
)
U.S. government securities
—
—
19,288
(559
)
19,288
(559
)
Other securities
—
—
5,131
(139
)
5,131
(139
)
Total
$
113,296
$
(263
)
$
629,451
$
(17,865
)
$
742,747
$
(18,128
)
December 31, 2013
U.S. government agency and government-sponsored enterprise mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations
$
492,921
$
(10,991
)
$
121,303
$
(12,684
)
$
614,224
$
(23,675
)
State and municipal securities
112,400
(3,069
)
13,815
(923
)
126,215
(3,992
)
U.S. government agency and government-sponsored enterprise securities
260,001
(8,063
)
28,447
(2,003
)
288,448
(10,066
)
U.S. government securities
20,114
(967
)
—
—
20,114
(967
)
Other securities
2,257
(58
)
2,783
(173
)
5,040
(231
)
Total
$
887,693
$
(23,148
)
$
166,348
$
(15,783
)
$
1,054,041
$
(38,931
)
At
June 30, 2014
, there were
54
U.S. government agency and government-sponsored enterprise mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations securities in an unrealized loss position, of which
45
were in a continuous loss position for 12 months or more. The decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates relative to where these investments fall within the yield curve and their individual characteristics. Because the Company does not intend to sell these securities nor does the Company consider it more likely than not that it will be required to sell these securities before the recovery of amortized cost basis, which may be upon maturity, the Company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at
June 30, 2014
.
At
June 30, 2014
, there were
88
state and municipal government securities in an unrealized loss position, of which
64
were in a continuous loss position for 12 months or more. The unrealized losses on state and municipal securities were caused by interest rate changes or widening of market spreads subsequent to the purchase of the individual securities. Management monitors published credit ratings of these securities for adverse changes. As of
June 30, 2014
, none of the rated obligations of state and local government entities held by the Company had a below investment grade credit rating. Because the credit quality of these securities are investment grade and the Company does not intend to sell these securities nor does the Company consider it more likely than not that it will be required to sell these securities before the recovery of amortized cost basis, which may be upon maturity, the Company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at
June 30, 2014
.
At
June 30, 2014
, there were
27
U.S. government agency and government-sponsored enterprise securities in an unrealized loss position,
22
of which were in a continuous loss position for 12 months or more. The decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates relative to where these investments fall within the yield curve and their individual characteristics. Because the Company does not currently intend to sell these securities nor does the Company consider it more likely than not that it will be required to sell these securities before the recovery of amortized cost basis, which may be upon maturity, the Company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at
June 30, 2014
.
10
Table of Contents
At
June 30, 2014
, there were
two
U.S. government securities in an unrealized loss position, both of which were in a continuous loss position for 12 months or more. The decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates relative to where these investments fall within the yield curve and their individual characteristics. Because the Company does not currently intend to sell these securities nor does the Company consider it more likely than not that it will be required to sell these securities before the recovery of amortized cost basis, which may be upon maturity, the Company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at
June 30, 2014
.
At
June 30, 2014
, there were
two
other securities in an unrealized loss position, both of which were in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 months or more. The decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates and the additional risk premium investors are demanding for investment securities with these characteristics. The Company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at
June 30, 2014
as it has the intent and ability to hold the investments for sufficient time to allow for recovery in the market value.
5.
Noncovered Loans
Noncovered loans include loans originated through our branch network and loan departments as well as acquired loans that are not subject to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) loss-sharing agreements.
The following is an analysis of the noncovered loan portfolio by major types of loans (net of unearned income):
June 30,
2014
December 31,
2013
Noncovered loans:
(in thousands)
Commercial business
$
1,735,588
$
1,561,782
Real estate:
One-to-four family residential
102,632
108,317
Commercial and multifamily residential
2,127,520
2,080,075
Total real estate
2,230,152
2,188,392
Real estate construction:
One-to-four family residential
61,481
54,155
Commercial and multifamily residential
134,140
126,390
Total real estate construction
195,621
180,545
Consumer
348,439
357,014
Less: Net unearned income
(57,126
)
(68,282
)
Total noncovered loans, net of unearned income
4,452,674
4,219,451
Less: Allowance for loan and lease losses
(49,494
)
(52,280
)
Total noncovered loans, net
$
4,403,180
$
4,167,171
Loans held for sale
$
750
$
735
At
June 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
, the Company had no material foreign activities. Substantially all of the Company’s loans and unfunded commitments are geographically concentrated in its service areas within the states of Washington and Oregon.
The Company has granted loans to executive officers and directors of the Company and related interests. These loans are made on the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unrelated persons and do not involve more than the normal risk of collectability. The aggregate dollar amount of these loans was
$11.6 million
at
June 30, 2014
and
$14.2 million
at
December 31, 2013
. During the first
six
months of
2014
, advances on related party loans totaled
$1.1 million
and repayments totaled
$3.7 million
.
At
June 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
,
$1.07 billion
and
$1.08 billion
of commercial and residential real estate loans were pledged as collateral on Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings and additional borrowing capacity. The Company has also pledged
$43.9 million
and
$45.2 million
of commercial loans to the Federal Reserve Bank for additional borrowing capacity at
June 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
, respectively.
11
Table of Contents
The following is an analysis of noncovered, nonaccrual loans as of
June 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
:
June 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
Recorded
Investment
Nonaccrual
Loans
Unpaid Principal
Balance
Nonaccrual
Loans
Recorded
Investment
Nonaccrual
Loans
Unpaid Principal
Balance
Nonaccrual
Loans
Noncovered loans:
(in thousands)
Commercial business:
Secured
$
11,190
$
15,739
$
12,433
$
19,186
Unsecured
294
326
176
202
Real estate:
One-to-four family residential
3,024
5,125
2,667
4,678
Commercial & multifamily residential:
Commercial land
658
998
442
783
Income property
5,062
7,648
4,267
5,383
Owner occupied
5,319
7,388
6,334
7,486
Real estate construction:
One-to-four family residential:
Land and acquisition
581
1,761
3,246
6,601
Residential construction
459
1,928
459
1,928
Consumer
4,026
5,758
3,991
6,187
Total
$
30,613
$
46,671
$
34,015
$
52,434
12
Table of Contents
The following is an aging of the recorded investment of the noncovered loan portfolio as of
June 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
:
Current
Loans
30 - 59
Days
Past Due
60 - 89
Days
Past Due
Greater
than 90
Days Past
Due
Total
Past Due
Nonaccrual
Loans
Total Loans
June 30, 2014
(in thousands)
Noncovered loans:
Commercial business:
Secured
$
1,640,938
$
3,046
$
2,602
$
—
$
5,648
$
11,190
$
1,657,776
Unsecured
72,749
142
67
—
209
294
73,252
Real estate:
One-to-four family residential
95,653
1,415
570
—
1,985
3,024
100,662
Commercial & multifamily residential:
Commercial land
148,163
—
—
—
—
658
148,821
Income property
1,191,882
1,336
9
—
1,345
5,062
1,198,289
Owner occupied
746,217
410
2,575
—
2,985
5,319
754,521
Real estate construction:
One-to-four family residential:
Land and acquisition
10,899
—
—
—
—
581
11,480
Residential construction
48,699
393
—
—
393
459
49,551
Commercial & multifamily residential:
Income property
87,603
—
—
—
—
—
87,603
Owner occupied
45,951
—
—
—
—
—
45,951
Consumer
319,958
717
67
—
784
4,026
324,768
Total
$
4,408,712
$
7,459
$
5,890
$
—
$
13,349
$
30,613
$
4,452,674
Current
Loans
30 - 59
Days
Past Due
60 - 89
Days
Past Due
Greater
than 90
Days Past
Due
Total
Past Due
Nonaccrual
Loans
Total Loans
December 31, 2013
(in thousands)
Noncovered loans:
Commercial business:
Secured
$
1,457,820
$
12,713
$
681
$
—
$
13,394
$
12,433
$
1,483,647
Unsecured
72,255
156
17
—
173
176
72,604
Real estate:
One-to-four family residential
100,591
1,993
641
—
2,634
2,667
105,892
Commercial & multifamily residential:
Commercial land
142,034
—
358
—
358
442
142,834
Income property
1,138,732
144
3,289
—
3,433
4,267
1,146,432
Owner occupied
749,561
4,714
—
—
4,714
6,334
760,609
Real estate construction:
One-to-four family residential:
Land and acquisition
8,225
199
—
—
199
3,246
11,670
Residential construction
41,533
—
—
—
—
459
41,992
Commercial & multifamily residential:
Income property
86,521
—
—
—
—
—
86,521
Owner occupied
38,916
—
—
—
—
—
38,916
Consumer
322,685
835
823
—
1,658
3,991
328,334
Total
$
4,158,873
$
20,754
$
5,809
$
—
$
26,563
$
34,015
$
4,219,451
13
Table of Contents
The following is an analysis of impaired loans as of
June 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
:
Recorded Investment
of Loans
Collectively Measured
for Contingency
Provision
Recorded Investment
of Loans
Individually
Measured for
Specific
Impairment
Impaired Loans With
Recorded Allowance
Impaired Loans Without
Recorded Allowance
Recorded
Investment
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Related
Allowance
Recorded
Investment
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
June 30, 2014
(in thousands)
Noncovered loans:
Commercial business:
Secured
$
1,651,286
$
6,490
$
1,332
$
2,450
$
128
$
5,158
$
5,929
Unsecured
73,233
19
19
19
19
—
—
Real estate:
One-to-four family residential
98,616
2,046
432
472
128
1,614
2,794
Commercial & multifamily residential:
Commercial land
148,722
99
—
—
—
99
398
Income property
1,190,323
7,966
—
—
—
7,966
12,518
Owner occupied
745,351
9,170
588
588
35
8,582
13,020
Real estate construction:
One-to-four family residential:
Land and acquisition
11,368
112
112
111
69
—
—
Residential construction
49,551
—
—
—
—
—
—
Commercial & multifamily residential:
Income property
87,603
—
—
—
—
—
—
Owner occupied
45,951
—
—
—
—
—
—
Consumer
324,616
152
20
26
1
132
199
Total
$
4,426,620
$
26,054
$
2,503
$
3,666
$
380
$
23,551
$
34,858
Recorded Investment
of Loans
Collectively Measured
for Contingency
Provision
Recorded Investment
of Loans
Individually
Measured for
Specific
Impairment
Impaired Loans With
Recorded Allowance
Impaired Loans Without
Recorded Allowance
Recorded
Investment
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Related
Allowance
Recorded
Investment
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
December 31, 2013
(in thousands)
Noncovered loans:
Commercial business:
Secured
$
1,478,560
$
5,087
$
2,866
$
2,885
$
343
$
2,221
$
2,560
Unsecured
72,569
35
35
35
35
—
—
Real estate:
One-to-four family residential
104,272
1,620
442
479
138
1,178
2,119
Commercial & multifamily residential:
Commercial land
142,719
115
—
—
—
115
398
Income property
1,140,019
6,413
918
933
26
5,495
7,885
Owner occupied
749,601
11,008
3,802
3,817
1,073
7,206
10,464
Real estate construction:
One-to-four family residential:
Land and acquisition
9,726
1,944
113
113
71
1,831
2,587
Residential construction
41,992
—
—
—
—
—
—
Commercial & multifamily residential:
Income property
86,521
—
—
—
—
—
—
Owner occupied
38,916
—
—
—
—
—
—
Consumer
328,167
167
23
27
4
144
210
Total
$
4,193,062
$
26,389
$
8,199
$
8,289
$
1,690
$
18,190
$
26,223
14
Table of Contents
The following table provides additional information on impaired loans for the
three
and
six
month periods indicated.
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2014
2013
2014
2013
Average Recorded
Investment
Impaired Loans
Interest Recognized
on
Impaired Loans
Average Recorded
Investment
Impaired Loans
Interest Recognized
on
Impaired Loans
Average Recorded
Investment
Impaired Loans
Interest Recognized
on
Impaired Loans
Average Recorded
Investment
Impaired Loans
Interest Recognized
on
Impaired Loans
Noncovered loans:
(in thousands)
Commercial business:
Secured
$
6,933
$
17
$
6,481
$
4
$
6,318
$
33
$
5,941
$
8
Unsecured
23
—
68
1
27
1
76
1
Real estate:
One-to-four family residential
2,069
11
1,538
27
1,920
23
1,722
31
Commercial & multifamily residential:
Commercial land
103
—
2,559
—
107
—
2,591
—
Income property
7,213
74
10,478
133
6,946
136
9,704
161
Owner occupied
9,222
235
10,437
230
9,817
476
10,926
510
Real estate construction:
One-to-four family residential:
Land and acquisition
653
1
2,931
1
1,083
3
2,894
3
Residential construction
—
—
72
—
—
—
701
—
Consumer
155
3
425
2
159
5
326
3
Total
$
26,371
$
341
$
34,989
$
398
$
26,377
$
677
$
34,881
$
717
15
Table of Contents
The following is an analysis of loans classified as troubled debt restructurings (“TDR”) during the
three
and
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
:
Three months ended June 30, 2014
Three months ended June 30, 2013
Number of TDR Modifications
Pre-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Post-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Number of TDR Modifications
Pre-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Post-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Noncovered loans:
(dollars in thousands)
Commercial business:
Secured
2
$
546
$
546
1
$
343
$
343
Commercial and multifamily residential:
Commercial land
—
—
—
1
137
137
Income property
—
—
—
3
943
943
Owner occupied
—
—
—
1
172
172
Total
2
$
546
$
546
6
$
1,595
$
1,595
Six months ended June 30, 2014
Six months ended June 30, 2013
Number of TDR Modifications
Pre-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Post-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Number of TDR Modifications
Pre-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Post-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Noncovered loans:
(dollars in thousands)
Commercial business:
Secured
4
$
759
$
759
1
$
343
$
343
Real estate:
One-to-four family residential
2
494
494
—
—
—
Commercial and multifamily residential:
Commercial land
—
—
—
1
137
137
Income property
1
143
126
3
943
943
Owner occupied
—
—
—
1
172
172
Real estate construction:
One-to-four family residential:
Land and acquisition
—
—
—
1
117
117
Total
7
$
1,396
$
1,379
7
$
1,712
$
1,712
The Company’s loans classified as TDR are loans that have been modified or the borrower has been granted special concessions due to financial difficulties that, if not for the challenges of the borrower, the Company would not otherwise consider. The TDR modifications or concessions are made to increase the likelihood that these borrowers with financial difficulties will be able to satisfy their debt obligations as amended. The concessions granted in the restructurings completed in the
six
month periods ending
June 30, 2014
and
2013
largely consisted of maturity extensions, interest rate modifications or a combination of both. In limited circumstances, a reduction in the principal balance of the loan could also be made as a concession. Credit losses for loans classified as TDR are measured on the same basis as impaired loans. For impaired loans, an allowance is established when the collateral value less selling costs (or discounted cash flows or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the recorded investment of that loan.
The Company had commitments to lend
$269 thousand
of additional funds on loans classified as TDR as of
June 30, 2014
, but had
no
commitments to lend additional funds on loans classified as TDR as of
December 31, 2013
. The Company did not have any loans modified as TDR that defaulted within twelve months of being modified as TDR during the
six
month periods ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
.
16
Table of Contents
6.
Allowance for Noncovered Loan and Lease Losses and Unfunded Commitments and Letters of Credit
We maintain an allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”) to absorb losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The size of the ALLL is determined through quarterly assessments of the probable estimated losses in the loan portfolio. Our methodology for making such assessments and determining the adequacy of the ALLL includes the following key elements:
1.
General valuation allowance consistent with the Contingencies topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”).
2.
Classified loss reserves on specific relationships. Specific allowances for identified problem loans are determined in accordance with the Receivables topic of the FASB ASC.
3.
The unallocated allowance provides for other factors inherent in our loan portfolio that may not have been contemplated in the general and specific components of the allowance. This unallocated amount generally comprises less than
5%
of the allowance. The unallocated amount is reviewed quarterly based on trends in credit losses, the results of credit reviews and overall economic trends.
The general valuation allowance is systematically calculated quarterly using quantitative and qualitative information about specific loan classes. The minimum required level with respect to which an entity develops a methodology to determine its allowance for loan and lease losses is by general categories of loans, such as commercial business, real estate, and consumer. However, the Company’s methodology in determining its allowance for loan and lease losses is prepared in a more detailed manner at the loan class level, utilizing specific categories such as commercial business secured, commercial business unsecured, real estate commercial land, and real estate income property multifamily.
The quantitative information uses historical losses from a specific loan class and incorporates the loan’s risk rating migration from origination to the point of loss based upon the consideration of an appropriate look back period. A loan’s risk rating is primarily determined based upon the borrower’s ability to fulfill its debt obligation from a cash flow perspective. In the event there is financial deterioration of the borrower, the borrower’s other sources of income or repayment are also considered, including recent appraisal values for collateral dependent loans. The qualitative information takes into account general economic and business conditions affecting our marketplace, seasoning of the loan portfolio, duration of the business cycle, etc. to ensure our methodologies reflect the current economic environment and other factors as using historical loss information exclusively may not give an accurate estimate of inherent losses within the Company’s loan portfolio.
When a loan is deemed to be impaired, the Company has to determine if a specific valuation allowance is required for that loan. The specific valuation allowance is a reserve, calculated at the individual loan level, for each loan determined to be both impaired and containing a value less than its recorded investment. The Company measures the impairment based on the discounted expected future cash flows, observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral less selling costs if the loan is collateral dependent or if foreclosure is probable. The specific reserve for each loan is equal to the difference between the recorded investment in the loan and its determined impairment value.
The ALLL is increased by provisions for loan and lease losses (“provision”) charged to expense, and is reduced by loans charged off, net of recoveries or a recovery of previous provisions. While the Company’s management believes the best information available is used to determine the ALLL, changes in market conditions could result in adjustments to the ALLL, affecting net income, if circumstances differ from the assumptions used in determining the ALLL.
We have used the same methodology for ALLL calculations during the
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
. Adjustments to the percentages of the ALLL allocated to loan categories are made based on trends with respect to delinquencies and problem loans within each class of loans. The Company reviews the ALLL quantitative and qualitative methodology on a quarterly basis and makes adjustments when appropriate. The Company continues to strive towards maintaining a conservative approach to credit quality and will continue to prudently adjust our ALLL as necessary in order to maintain adequate reserves. The Company carefully monitors the loan portfolio and continues to emphasize the importance of credit quality.
Once it is determined that all or a portion of a loan balance is uncollectable, and the amount can be reasonably estimated, the uncollectable portion of the loan is charged-off.
17
Table of Contents
The following tables show a detailed analysis of the allowance for loan and lease losses for noncovered loans for the
three
and
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
:
Beginning
Balance
Charge-offs
Recoveries
Provision (Recovery)
Ending
Balance
Specific
Reserve
General
Allocation
Three months ended June 30, 2014
(in thousands)
Noncovered loans:
Commercial business:
Secured
$
28,801
$
(1,642
)
$
1,435
$
(3,077
)
$
25,517
$
128
$
25,389
Unsecured
746
(75
)
277
(194
)
754
19
735
Real estate:
One-to-four family residential
1,194
—
12
(123
)
1,083
128
955
Commercial & multifamily residential:
Commercial land
579
(29
)
2
(82
)
470
—
470
Income property
10,107
(1,934
)
505
1,833
10,511
—
10,511
Owner occupied
4,560
—
30
399
4,989
35
4,954
Real estate construction:
One-to-four family residential:
Land and acquisition
580
—
2
(179
)
403
69
334
Residential construction
696
—
440
(459
)
677
—
677
Commercial & multifamily residential:
Income property
320
—
—
94
414
—
414
Owner occupied
154
—
—
12
166
—
166
Consumer
2,637
(909
)
338
577
2,643
1
2,642
Unallocated
68
—
—
1,799
1,867
—
1,867
Total
$
50,442
$
(4,589
)
$
3,041
$
600
$
49,494
$
380
$
49,114
Beginning
Balance
Charge-offs
Recoveries
Provision (Recovery)
Ending
Balance
Specific
Reserve
General
Allocation
Six months ended June 30, 2014
(in thousands)
Noncovered loans:
Commercial business:
Secured
$
31,027
$
(1,840
)
$
1,883
$
(5,553
)
$
25,517
$
128
$
25,389
Unsecured
696
(110
)
319
(151
)
754
19
735
Real estate:
One-to-four family residential
1,252
(207
)
40
(2
)
1,083
128
955
Commercial & multifamily residential:
Commercial land
489
(29
)
19
(9
)
470
—
470
Income property
9,234
(1,934
)
518
2,693
10,511
—
10,511
Owner occupied
3,605
(1,023
)
39
2,368
4,989
35
4,954
Real estate construction:
One-to-four family residential:
Land and acquisition
610
—
41
(248
)
403
69
334
Residential construction
822
—
443
(588
)
677
—
677
Commercial & multifamily residential:
Income property
285
—
—
129
414
—
414
Owner occupied
58
—
—
108
166
—
166
Consumer
2,547
(1,636
)
591
1,141
2,643
1
2,642
Unallocated
1,655
—
—
212
1,867
—
1,867
Total
$
52,280
$
(6,779
)
$
3,893
$
100
$
49,494
$
380
$
49,114
18
Table of Contents
Beginning
Balance
Charge-offs
Recoveries
Provision (Recovery)
Ending
Balance
Specific
Reserve
General
Allocation
Three months ended June 30, 2013
(in thousands)
Noncovered loans:
Commercial business:
Secured
$
26,871
$
(856
)
$
312
$
4,245
$
30,572
$
242
$
30,330
Unsecured
750
(105
)
40
136
821
51
770
Real estate:
One-to-four family residential
657
(28
)
141
(98
)
672
105
567
Commercial & multifamily residential:
Commercial land
433
(11
)
17
252
691
262
429
Income property
9,411
(35
)
27
292
9,695
76
9,619
Owner occupied
5,458
(568
)
40
(415
)
4,515
30
4,485
Real estate construction:
One-to-four family residential:
Land and acquisition
990
—
35
(256
)
769
73
696
Residential construction
538
—
14
(348
)
204
—
204
Commercial & multifamily residential:
Income property
382
—
—
(141
)
241
—
241
Owner occupied
108
—
—
(28
)
80
—
80
Consumer
2,364
(638
)
194
535
2,455
—
2,455
Unallocated
3,157
—
—
(2,174
)
983
—
983
Total
$
51,119
$
(2,241
)
$
820
$
2,000
$
51,698
$
839
$
50,859
Beginning
Balance
Charge-offs
Recoveries
Provision (Recovery)
Ending
Balance
Specific
Reserve
General
Allocation
Six months ended June 30, 2013
(in thousands)
Noncovered loans:
Commercial business:
Secured
$
27,270
$
(1,844
)
$
392
$
4,754
$
30,572
$
242
$
30,330
Unsecured
753
(431
)
73
426
821
51
770
Real estate:
One-to-four family residential
694
(144
)
141
(19
)
672
105
567
Commercial & multifamily residential:
Commercial land
460
(11
)
27
215
691
262
429
Income property
11,033
(818
)
106
(626
)
9,695
76
9,619
Owner occupied
6,362
(568
)
44
(1,323
)
4,515
30
4,485
Real estate construction:
One-to-four family residential:
Land and acquisition
1,171
(32
)
2,174
(2,544
)
769
73
696
Residential construction
635
(101
)
14
(344
)
204
—
204
Commercial & multifamily residential:
Income property
316
—
—
(75
)
241
—
241
Owner occupied
102
—
—
(22
)
80
—
80
Consumer
2,437
(809
)
241
586
2,455
—
2,455
Unallocated
1,011
—
—
(28
)
983
—
983
Total
$
52,244
$
(4,758
)
$
3,212
$
1,000
$
51,698
$
839
$
50,859
19
Table of Contents
Changes in the allowance for unfunded commitments and letters of credit, a component of other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet, are summarized as follows:
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
June 30,
June 30,
2014
2013
2014
2013
(in thousands)
Balance at beginning of period
$
2,455
$
1,915
$
2,505
$
1,915
Net changes in the allowance for unfunded commitments and letters of credit
(100
)
550
(150
)
550
Balance at end of period
$
2,355
$
2,465
$
2,355
$
2,465
Risk Elements
The extension of credit in the form of loans or other credit products to individuals and businesses is one of our principal business activities. Our policies and applicable laws and regulations require risk analysis as well as ongoing portfolio and credit management. We manage our credit risk through lending limit constraints, credit review, approval policies and extensive, ongoing internal monitoring. We also manage credit risk through diversification of the loan portfolio by type of loan, type of industry, type of borrower and by limiting the aggregation of debt to a single borrower.
Risk ratings are reviewed and updated whenever appropriate, with more periodic reviews as the risk and dollar value of loss on the loan increases. In the event full collection of principal and interest is not reasonably assured, the loan is appropriately downgraded and, if warranted, placed on nonaccrual status even though the loan may be current as to principal and interest payments. Additionally, we assess whether an impairment of a loan warrants specific reserves or a write-down of the loan.
Pass loans are generally considered to have sufficient sources of repayment in order to repay the loan in full in accordance with all terms and conditions. Special mention loans have potential weaknesses that, if left uncorrected, may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the Company’s credit position at some future date. Loans with a risk rating of Substandard or worse are reported as classified loans in our allowance for loan and lease losses analysis. We review these loans to assess the ability of our borrowers to service all interest and principal obligations and, as a result, the risk rating may be adjusted accordingly. Substandard loans reflect loans where a loss is possible if loan weaknesses are not corrected. Doubtful loans have a high probability of loss, however, the amount of loss has not yet been determined. Loss loans are considered uncollectable and when identified, are charged off.
20
Table of Contents
The following is an analysis of the credit quality of our noncovered loan portfolio as of
June 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
:
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Loss
Total
June 30, 2014
(in thousands)
Noncovered loans:
Commercial business:
Secured
$
1,572,391
$
41,465
$
43,920
$
—
$
—
$
1,657,776
Unsecured
72,825
199
228
—
—
73,252
Real estate:
One-to-four family residential
95,647
55
4,960
—
—
100,662
Commercial and multifamily residential:
Commercial land
145,901
—
2,920
—
—
148,821
Income property
1,173,006
4,455
20,828
—
—
1,198,289
Owner occupied
742,585
2,996
8,940
—
—
754,521
Real estate construction:
One-to-four family residential:
Land and acquisition
9,758
—
1,722
—
—
11,480
Residential construction
46,335
—
3,216
—
—
49,551
Commercial and multifamily residential:
Income property
87,603
—
—
—
—
87,603
Owner occupied
45,538
413
—
—
—
45,951
Consumer
319,518
5
5,245
—
—
324,768
Total
$
4,311,107
$
49,588
$
91,979
$
—
$
—
4,452,674
Less:
Allowance for loan and lease losses
49,494
Noncovered loans, net
$
4,403,180
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Loss
Total
December 31, 2013
(in thousands)
Noncovered loans:
Commercial business:
Secured
$
1,372,038
$
43,309
$
68,300
$
—
$
—
$
1,483,647
Unsecured
72,226
199
179
—
—
72,604
Real estate:
One-to-four family residential
98,626
1,567
5,699
—
—
105,892
Commercial and multifamily residential:
Commercial land
137,850
—
4,984
—
—
142,834
Income property
1,108,033
5,473
32,926
—
—
1,146,432
Owner occupied
748,725
—
11,884
—
—
760,609
Real estate construction:
One-to-four family residential:
Land and acquisition
7,526
—
4,144
—
—
11,670
Residential construction
36,270
2,352
3,370
—
—
41,992
Commercial and multifamily residential:
Income property
86,206
—
315
—
—
86,521
Owner occupied
38,916
—
—
—
—
38,916
Consumer
321,348
331
6,188
467
—
328,334
Total
$
4,027,764
$
53,231
$
137,989
$
467
$
—
4,219,451
Less:
Allowance for loan and lease losses
52,280
Noncovered loans, net
$
4,167,171
21
Table of Contents
7.
Changes in Noncovered Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”)
The following tables set forth activity in noncovered OREO for the
three
and
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
:
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2014
2013
2014
2013
(in thousands)
Noncovered OREO:
Balance at beginning of period
$
15,841
$
11,916
$
23,834
$
10,676
Established through acquisitions
—
14,708
—
14,708
Transfers in, net of write-downs ($0, $11, $0 and $43, respectively)
2,090
2,067
2,334
4,777
Additional OREO write-downs
(636
)
(477
)
(1,565
)
(570
)
Proceeds from sale of OREO property
(2,196
)
(4,057
)
(10,298
)
(5,622
)
Gain on sale of OREO, net
104
182
898
370
Total noncovered OREO at end of period
$
15,203
$
24,339
$
15,203
$
24,339
8. Covered Assets and FDIC Loss-sharing Asset
Covered Assets
Covered assets consist of loans and OREO acquired in certain FDIC-assisted acquisitions during 2010 and 2011, for which the Bank entered into loss-sharing agreements, whereby the FDIC will cover a substantial portion of future losses on loans (and related unfunded loan commitments), OREO and certain accrued interest on loans during the terms of the agreements. Under the terms of the loss-sharing agreements, the FDIC will absorb
80%
of losses and share in
80%
of loss recoveries up to specified amounts. With respect to loss-sharing agreements for two acquisitions completed in 2010, after those specified amounts, the FDIC will absorb
95%
of losses and share in
95%
of loss recoveries. The loss-sharing provisions of the agreements for commercial and single-family mortgage loans are in effect for
five
and
ten
years, respectively, from the acquisition dates and the loss recovery provisions are in effect for
eight
and
ten
years, respectively, from the acquisition dates.
Ten years and forty-five days after the acquisition dates, the Bank must pay to the FDIC a clawback in the event the losses from the acquisitions fail to reach stated levels. The amount of the clawback is determined by a formula specified in each individual loss-sharing agreement. As of
June 30, 2014
, the net present value of the Bank’s estimated clawback liability is
$4.0 million
, which is included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.
22
Table of Contents
The following is an analysis of our covered loans, net of related allowance for losses as of
June 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
:
June 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
Covered loans:
(in thousands)
Commercial business
$
60,287
$
72,870
Real estate:
One-to-four family residential
36,711
41,642
Commercial and multifamily residential
153,765
170,879
Total real estate
190,476
212,521
Real estate construction:
One-to-four family residential
9,444
14,781
Commercial and multifamily residential
3,910
6,869
Total real estate construction
13,354
21,650
Consumer
30,755
34,101
Subtotal of covered loans
294,872
341,142
Less:
Valuation discount resulting from acquisition accounting
32,971
43,297
Allowance for loan losses
19,801
20,174
Covered loans, net of allowance for loan losses
$
242,100
$
277,671
Acquired impaired loans are accounted for under ASC 310-30 and initially measured at fair value based on expected future cash flows over the life of the loans. Acquired loans that have common risk characteristics are aggregated into pools. The Company remeasures contractual and expected cash flows, at the pool-level, on a quarterly basis.
Contractual cash flows are calculated based upon the loan pool terms after applying a prepayment factor. Calculation of the applied prepayment factor for contractual cash flows is the same as described below for expected cash flows.
Inputs to the determination of expected cash flows include cumulative default and prepayment data as well as loss severity and recovery lag information. Cumulative default and prepayment data are calculated via a transition matrix. The transition matrix is a matrix of probability values that specifies the probability of a loan pool transitioning into a particular delinquency state (e.g. 0-30 days past due, 31 to 60 days, etc.) given its delinquency state at the remeasurement date. Loss severity factors are based upon either actual charge-off data within the loan pools or industry averages and recovery lags are based upon the collateral within the loan pools.
Acquired impaired loans are also subject to the Company’s internal and external credit review and are risk rated using the same criteria as loans originated by the Company. However, risk ratings are not a clear indicator of losses on acquired loans as the loans were acquired with a significant discount and a majority of the losses are recoverable from the FDIC under the loss-sharing agreements.
Losses attributable to draws on acquired loans, advanced subsequent to the loan acquisition date, are accounted for under ASC 450-20 and those amounts are also subject to the Company’s internal and external credit review. An allowance for loan losses is estimated in a similar manner as the originated loan portfolio, and a provision for loan losses is charged to earnings as necessary.
The excess of cash flows expected to be collected over the initial fair value of acquired loans is referred to as the accretable yield and is accreted into interest income over the estimated life of the acquired loans using the effective yield method. Other adjustments to the accretable yield include changes in the estimated remaining life of the acquired loans, changes in expected cash flows and changes of indices for acquired loans with variable interest rates.
23
Table of Contents
The following table shows the changes in accretable yield for acquired loans for the
three
and
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
:
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2014
2013
2014
2013
(in thousands)
Balance at beginning of period
$
101,543
$
158,786
$
103,907
$
166,888
Accretion
(10,055
)
(13,520
)
(20,624
)
(27,997
)
Disposals
—
(1,998
)
(2,826
)
5,151
Reclassifications (to) from nonaccretable difference
1,023
(2,757
)
12,054
(3,531
)
Balance at end of period
$
92,511
$
140,511
$
92,511
$
140,511
During the
three
months ended
June 30, 2014
, the Company recorded a provision for losses on covered loans of
$1.5 million
. Of this amount,
$1.7 million
was impairment calculated in accordance with ASC 310-30 and
$200 thousand
was a provision recapture to adjust the allowance for loss calculated under ASC 450-20 for draws on acquired loans. The impact to earnings of the
$1.5 million
of provision for covered loans was partially offset through noninterest income by a
$1.2 million
favorable adjustment to the change FDIC loss-sharing asset line item.
The changes in the ALLL for covered loans for the
three
and
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
are summarized as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2014
2013
2014
2013
(in thousands)
Balance at beginning of period
$
20,129
$
29,489
$
20,174
$
30,056
Loans charged off
(3,842
)
(2,642
)
(8,115
)
(5,024
)
Recoveries
1,997
1,000
3,803
1,835
Provision (recapture) for loan losses
1,517
(1,712
)
3,939
(732
)
Balance at end of period
$
19,801
$
26,135
$
19,801
$
26,135
24
Table of Contents
The following is an analysis of the credit quality of our covered loan portfolio as of
June 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
:
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Loss
Total
June 30, 2014
(in thousands)
Covered loans:
Commercial business:
Secured
$
42,653
$
1,151
$
14,206
$
7
$
—
$
58,017
Unsecured
2,168
—
102
—
—
2,270
Real estate:
One-to-four family residential
31,618
—
5,093
—
—
36,711
Commercial and multifamily residential:
Commercial land
10,410
—
7,253
—
—
17,663
Income property
56,858
3,220
7,695
—
—
67,773
Owner occupied
61,344
362
6,623
—
—
68,329
Real estate construction:
One-to-four family residential:
Land and acquisition
3,589
—
1,405
—
—
4,994
Residential construction
420
—
4,030
—
—
4,450
Commercial and multifamily residential:
Income property
1,478
—
1,491
—
—
2,969
Owner occupied
941
—
—
—
—
941
Consumer
27,531
—
3,224
—
—
30,755
Total
$
239,010
$
4,733
$
51,122
$
7
$
—
294,872
Less:
Valuation discount resulting from acquisition accounting
32,971
Allowance for loan losses
19,801
Covered loans, net
$
242,100
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Loss
Total
December 31, 2013
(in thousands)
Covered loans:
Commercial business:
Secured
$
48,510
$
2,849
$
18,291
$
—
$
—
$
69,650
Unsecured
2,732
396
92
—
—
3,220
Real estate:
One-to-four family residential
35,066
1,842
4,734
—
—
41,642
Commercial and multifamily residential:
Commercial land
10,778
198
7,589
—
—
18,565
Income property
55,985
3,950
10,657
—
—
70,592
Owner occupied
67,653
111
13,958
—
—
81,722
Real estate construction:
One-to-four family residential:
Land and acquisition
4,674
2,739
1,936
—
—
9,349
Residential construction
3,008
—
2,424
—
—
5,432
Commercial and multifamily residential:
Income property
3,806
—
1,709
—
—
5,515
Owner occupied
1,074
—
280
—
—
1,354
Consumer
30,722
33
3,319
27
—
34,101
Total
$
264,008
$
12,118
$
64,989
$
27
$
—
341,142
Less:
Valuation discount resulting from acquisition accounting
43,297
Allowance for loan losses
20,174
Covered loans, net
$
277,671
25
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth activity in covered OREO at carrying value for the
three
and
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
:
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2014
2013
2014
2013
(in thousands)
Covered OREO:
Balance at beginning of period
$
14,712
$
13,811
$
12,093
$
16,311
Transfers in
—
3,125
5,507
4,530
Write-downs
(338
)
(29
)
(989
)
(94
)
Proceeds from sale of OREO property
(2,530
)
(7,376
)
(5,634
)
(13,814
)
Net gain on sale of OREO
1,207
3,323
2,074
5,921
Total covered OREO at end of period
$
13,051
$
12,854
$
13,051
$
12,854
The covered OREO is subject to loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC in which the FDIC will share in
80%
of additional write-downs, as well as gains and losses on covered OREO sales, or
95%
, if applicable, of additional write-downs, as wells as gains and losses on covered OREO sales if the minimum loss share thresholds are met.
FDIC Loss-sharing Asset
At
June 30, 2014
, the FDIC loss-sharing asset is comprised of a
$25.0 million
FDIC indemnification asset and a
$2.9 million
FDIC receivable. The indemnification represents the cash flows the Company expects to collect from the FDIC under the loss-sharing agreements and the FDIC receivable represents the reimbursable amounts from the FDIC that have not yet been received.
For covered loans, the Company remeasures contractual and expected cash flows on a quarterly basis. When the quarterly remeasurement process results in a decrease in expected cash flows due to an increase in expected credit losses, impairment is recorded. As a result of this impairment, the indemnification asset is increased to reflect anticipated future cash to be received from the FDIC. Consistent with the loss-sharing agreements between the Company and the FDIC, the amount of the increase to the indemnification asset is measured as
80%
of the resulting impairment.
Alternatively, when the quarterly remeasurement results in an increase in expected future cash flows due to a decrease in expected credit losses, the nonaccretable difference decreases and the effective yield of the related loan portfolio is increased. As a result of the improved expected cash flows, the indemnification asset would be reduced first by the amount of any impairment previously recorded and, second, by increased amortization over the remaining life of the related loss-sharing agreement.
The following table shows a detailed analysis of the FDIC loss-sharing asset for the
three
and
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
:
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2014
2013
2014
2013
(in thousands)
Balance at beginning of period
$
36,837
$
83,115
$
39,846
$
96,354
Adjustments not reflected in income:
Cash payments from the FDIC
(3,442
)
(3,268
)
(1,765
)
(6,387
)
FDIC reimbursable losses (recoveries), net
(364
)
664
(231
)
1,027
Adjustments reflected in income:
Amortization, net
(5,764
)
(9,801
)
(12,216
)
(19,580
)
Loan impairment (recapture)
1,214
(1,370
)
3,151
(585
)
Sale of other real estate
(965
)
(2,251
)
(1,721
)
(3,597
)
Write-downs of other real estate
276
102
792
154
Other
189
183
125
(12
)
Balance at end of period
$
27,981
$
67,374
$
27,981
$
67,374
26
Table of Contents
9.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
In accordance with the Intangibles – Goodwill and Other topic of the FASB ASC, goodwill is not amortized but is reviewed for potential impairment at the reporting unit level. Management analyzes its goodwill for impairment on an annual basis on July 31 and between annual tests in certain circumstances such as material adverse changes in legal, business, regulatory and economic factors. An impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value.
The core deposit intangible (“CDI”) is evaluated for impairment if events and circumstances indicate a possible impairment. The CDI is amortized on an accelerated basis over an estimated life of
10 years
.
The following table sets forth activity for goodwill and other intangible assets for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2014
2013
2014
2013
(in thousands)
Goodwill
Goodwill at beginning of period
$
343,952
$
115,554
$
343,952
$
115,554
Established through acquisitions (1)
—
228,398
—
228,398
Total goodwill
343,952
343,952
343,952
343,952
Other intangible assets, net
Core deposit intangible:
Gross core deposit intangible balance at beginning of period
47,698
32,441
47,698
32,441
Accumulated amortization at beginning of period
(24,344
)
(17,748
)
(22,765
)
(16,720
)
Core deposit intangible, net at beginning of period
23,354
14,693
24,933
15,721
Established through acquisitions (1)
—
15,257
—
15,257
CDI current period amortization
(1,481
)
(1,693
)
(3,060
)
(2,721
)
Total core deposit intangible, net at end of period
21,873
28,257
21,873
28,257
Intangible assets not subject to amortization
919
913
919
913
Other intangible assets, net at end of period
22,792
29,170
22,792
29,170
Total goodwill and other intangible assets at end of period
$
366,744
$
373,122
$
366,744
$
373,122
__________
(1) Goodwill established through acquisitions has been retrospectively adjusted for the prior year periods due to adjustments to provisional amounts made related to the West Coast acquisition. See Note 3, Business Combinations, for additional information regarding goodwill and intangible assets recorded related to the acquisition of West Coast on April 1, 2013.
The following table provides the estimated future amortization expense of core deposit intangibles for the remaining six months ending
December 31, 2014
and the succeeding four years:
Amount
(in thousands)
Year ending December 31,
2014
$
2,903
2015
4,934
2016
4,195
2017
3,361
2018
2,500
27
Table of Contents
10.
Derivatives and Balance Sheet Offsetting
The Company periodically enters into certain commercial loan interest rate swap agreements in order to provide commercial loan customers the ability to convert from variable to fixed interest rates. Under these agreements, the Company enters into a variable-rate loan agreement with a customer in addition to a swap agreement. This swap agreement effectively converts the customer’s variable rate loan into a fixed rate. The Company then enters into a corresponding swap agreement with a third party in order to offset its exposure on the variable and fixed components of the customer agreement. As the interest rate swap agreements with the customers and third parties are not designated as hedges under the Derivatives and Hedging topic of the FASB ASC, the instruments are marked to market in earnings. The notional amount of open interest rate swap agreements at
June 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
was
$208.3 million
and
$179.5 million
, respectively. There was
no
impact to the statement of income for the
three
month periods ending
June 30, 2014
and
2013
.
The following table presents the fair value of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments at
June 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
:
Asset Derivatives
Liability Derivatives
June 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
June 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
Balance Sheet
Location
Fair Value
Balance Sheet
Location
Fair Value
Balance Sheet
Location
Fair Value
Balance Sheet
Location
Fair Value
(in thousands)
Interest rate contracts
Other assets
$
10,559
Other assets
$
9,044
Other liabilities
$
10,559
Other liabilities
$
9,044
The Company is party to interest rate swap agreements and repurchase agreements that are subject to enforceable master netting arrangements or similar agreements. Under these agreements, the Company may have the right to net settle multiple contracts with the same counterparty. The following tables show the gross interest rate swap agreements and repurchase agreements in the consolidated balance sheets and the respective collateral received or pledged in the form of other financial instruments, which are generally marketable securities. The collateral amounts in these tables are limited to the outstanding balances of the related asset or liability. Therefore, instances of overcollateralization are not shown.
Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets/Liabilities
Gross Amounts Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
Net Amounts of Assets/Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
Collateral Posted
Net Amount
June 30, 2014
(in thousands)
Assets
Interest rate contracts
$
10,559
$
—
$
10,559
$
—
$
10,559
Liabilities
Interest rate contracts
$
10,559
$
—
$
10,559
$
(10,559
)
$
—
Repurchase agreements
$
25,000
$
—
$
25,000
$
(25,000
)
$
—
December 31, 2013
Assets
Interest rate contracts
$
9,044
$
—
$
9,044
$
—
$
9,044
Liabilities
Interest rate contracts
$
9,044
$
—
$
9,044
$
(9,044
)
$
—
Repurchase agreements
$
25,000
$
—
$
25,000
$
(25,000
)
$
—
28
Table of Contents
11.
Shareholders’ Equity
Preferred Stock.
In conjunction with the acquisition of West Coast, the Company issued
8,782
shares of mandatorily convertible cumulative participating preferred stock, Series B (“Series B Preferred Stock”). The Series B Preferred Stock is not subject to the operation of a sinking fund. The Series B Preferred Stock is not redeemable by the Company and is perpetual with no maturity. The holders of Series B Preferred Stock have no general voting rights. If the Company declares and pays a dividend to its common shareholders, it must declare and pay to its holders of Series B Preferred Stock, on the same date, a dividend in an amount per share of the Series B Preferred Stock that is intended to provide such holders dividends in the amount they would have received if shares of Series B Preferred Stock had been converted into common stock as of that date. The outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock are convertible into
102,363
shares of Company common stock.
Warrants to Purchase Common Stock.
In conjunction with the acquisition of West Coast, the Company issued Amended and Restated Warrants (the “Warrants”) to purchase shares of Company common stock at an exercise price of
$8.58
per share. The Company’s Amended and Restated Warrants amended and restated Class C Warrants previously issued by West Coast. The Warrants were immediately exercisable and will expire on October 23, 2016. At
June 30, 2014
, the aggregate number of shares of Company common stock and value called for by warrants outstanding was
582,799
and
$5.0 million
, respectively. This reflects the exercise of
1,631,840
warrant shares during the six month period ended
June 30, 2014
. As the warrants contain a cashless exercise feature, the net shares issued by the Company as a result of this exercise activity was
1,139,698
.
Dividends.
On
January 23, 2014
the Company declared a quarterly cash dividend of
$0.12
per common share and common share equivalent for holders of preferred stock, payable on
February 19, 2014
to shareholders of record at the close of business
February 5, 2014
. On
April 23, 2014
, the Company declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of
$0.12
per common share, and common share equivalent for holders of preferred stock, and a special, one-time cash dividend of
$0.12
per common share, and common share equivalent for holders of preferred stock, both payable on
May 21, 2014
to shareholders of record at the close of business
May 7, 2014
. Subsequent to quarter end, on
July 23, 2014
, the Company declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of
$0.14
per common share, and common share equivalent for holders of preferred stock and a special, one-time cash dividend of
$0.14
per common share, and common share equivalent for holders of preferred stock, both payable on
August 20, 2014
to shareholders of record at the close of business
August 6, 2014
. The payment of cash dividends is subject to federal regulatory requirements for capital levels and other restrictions. In addition, the cash dividends paid by Columbia Bank to the Company are subject to both federal and state regulatory requirements.
29
Table of Contents
12. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The following table shows changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component for the
three
and
six
month periods ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
:
Unrealized Gains and Losses on Available-for-Sale Securities (1)
Unrealized Gains and Losses on Pension Plan Liability (1)
Total (1)
Three months ended June 30, 2014
(in thousands)
Beginning balance
$
(3,131
)
$
(1,912
)
$
(5,043
)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
8,768
—
8,768
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss
(2)
(189
)
24
(165
)
Net current-period other comprehensive income
8,579
24
8,603
Ending balance
$
5,448
$
(1,888
)
$
3,560
Three months ended June 30, 2013
Beginning balance
$
18,185
$
(1,466
)
$
16,719
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications
(25,930
)
—
(25,930
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income
(2)
(59
)
60
1
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)
(25,989
)
60
(25,929
)
Ending balance
$
(7,804
)
$
(1,406
)
$
(9,210
)
Six months ended June 30, 2014
Beginning balance
$
(10,108
)
$
(1,936
)
$
(12,044
)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
15,887
—
15,887
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income
(2)
(331
)
48
(283
)
Net current-period other comprehensive income
15,556
48
15,604
Ending balance
$
5,448
$
(1,888
)
$
3,560
Six months ended June 30, 2013
Beginning balance
$
20,918
$
(769
)
$
20,149
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications
(28,423
)
(756
)
(29,179
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income
(2)
(299
)
119
(180
)
Net current-period other comprehensive loss
(28,722
)
(637
)
(29,359
)
Ending balance
$
(7,804
)
$
(1,406
)
$
(9,210
)
__________
(1) All amounts are net of tax. Amounts in parenthesis indicate debits.
(2) See following table for details about these reclassifications.
30
Table of Contents
The following table shows details regarding the reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive income for the
three
month periods ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
:
Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
Affected line Item in the Consolidated
2014
2013
2014
2013
Statement of Income
(in thousands)
Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities
Investment securities gains
$
296
$
92
$
519
$
462
Investment securities gains, net
296
92
519
462
Total before tax
(107
)
(33
)
(188
)
(163
)
Income tax provision
$
189
$
59
$
331
$
299
Net of tax
Amortization of pension plan liability
Actuarial losses
$
(37
)
$
(92
)
$
(74
)
$
(184
)
Compensation and employee benefits
(37
)
(92
)
(74
)
(184
)
Total before tax
13
32
26
65
Income tax benefit
$
(24
)
$
(60
)
$
(48
)
$
(119
)
Net of tax
13.
Fair Value Accounting and Measurement
The Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures topic of the FASB ASC defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure requirements about fair value. We hold fixed and variable rate interest-bearing securities, investments in marketable equity securities and certain other financial instruments, which are carried at fair value. Fair value is determined based upon quoted prices when available or through the use of alternative approaches, such as matrix or model pricing, when market quotes are not readily accessible or available.
The valuation techniques are based upon observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect our own market assumptions. These two types of inputs create the following fair value hierarchy:
Level 1 – Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date.
Level 2 – Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.
Level 3 – Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.
Fair values are determined as follows:
Securities at fair value are priced using a combination of market activity, industry recognized information sources, yield curves, discounted cash flow models and other factors. These fair value calculations are considered a Level 2 input method under the provisions of the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures topic of the FASB ASC for all securities other than U.S. Treasury notes, which are considered a Level 1 input method.
Interest rate contract positions are valued in models, which use as their basis, readily observable market parameters and are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.
31
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis at
June 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
by level within the fair value hierarchy. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement:
Fair value
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
June 30, 2014
(in thousands)
Assets
Securities available for sale:
U.S. government agency and government-sponsored enterprise mortgage-back securities and collateralized mortgage obligations
$
862,618
$
—
$
862,618
$
—
State and municipal debt securities
380,506
—
380,506
—
U.S. government agency and government-sponsored enterprise securities
321,389
—
321,389
—
U.S. government securities
20,337
20,337
—
—
Other securities
5,167
—
5,167
—
Total securities available for sale
$
1,590,017
$
20,337
$
1,569,680
$
—
Other assets (Interest rate contracts)
$
10,559
$
—
$
10,559
$
—
Liabilities
Other liabilities (Interest rate contracts)
$
10,559
$
—
$
10,559
$
—
Fair value
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
December 31, 2013
(in thousands)
Assets
Securities available for sale:
U.S. government agency and government-sponsored enterprise mortgage-back securities and collateralized mortgage obligations
$
948,408
$
—
$
948,408
$
—
State and municipal debt securities
364,470
—
364,470
—
U.S. government agency and government-sponsored enterprise securities
326,039
—
326,039
—
U.S. government securities
20,114
20,114
—
—
Other securities
5,080
—
5,080
—
Total securities available for sale
$
1,664,111
$
20,114
$
1,643,997
$
—
Other assets (Interest rate contracts)
$
9,044
$
—
$
9,044
$
—
Liabilities
Other liabilities (Interest rate contracts)
$
9,044
$
—
$
9,044
$
—
There were
no
transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy during the
six
month periods ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
. The Company recognizes transfers between levels of the valuation hierarchy based on the valuation level at the end of the reporting period.
32
Table of Contents
Nonrecurring Measurements
Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis after initial recognition such as loans measured for impairment and OREO. The following methods were used to estimate the fair value of each such class of financial instrument:
Impaired loans
—A loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due (both interest and principal) according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, a loan’s observable market price, or the fair market value of the collateral less estimated costs to sell if the loan is a collateral-dependent loan. Generally, the Company utilizes the fair market value of the collateral to measure impairment. The impairment evaluations are performed in conjunction with the ALLL process on a quarterly basis by officers in the Special Credits group, which reports to the Chief Credit Officer. The Real Estate Appraisal Services Department (“REASD”), which also reports to the Chief Credit Officer, is responsible for obtaining appraisals from third-parties or performing internal evaluations. If an appraisal is obtained from a third-party, the REASD reviews the appraisal to evaluate the adequacy of the appraisal report, including its scope, methods, accuracy, and reasonableness.
Other real estate owned and other personal property owned (“OPPO”)
—OREO and OPPO are real and personal property that the Bank has taken ownership of in partial or full satisfaction of a loan or loans. OREO and OPPO are generally measured based on the item’s fair market value as indicated by an appraisal or a letter of intent to purchase. OREO and OPPO are recorded at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less estimated costs to sell. This amount becomes the property’s new basis. Any write-downs based on the property fair value less estimated costs to sell at the date of acquisition are charged to the allowance for loan and lease losses. Management periodically reviews OREO and OPPO in an effort to ensure the property is carried at the lower of its new basis or fair value, net of estimated costs to sell. Any write-downs subsequent to acquisition are charged to earnings. The initial and subsequent write-down evaluations are performed by officers in the Special Credits group, which reports to the Chief Credit Officer. The REASD obtains appraisals from third-parties for OREO and OPPO and performs internal evaluations. If an appraisal is obtained from a third-party, the REASD reviews the appraisal to evaluate the adequacy of the appraisal report, including its scope, methods, accuracy, and reasonableness.
The following tables set forth the Company’s assets that were measured using fair value estimates on a nonrecurring basis during the three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
:
Fair value at June 30, 2014
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
Losses During the Three Months Ended
June 30, 2014
Losses During the Six Months Ended
June 30, 2014
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
(in thousands)
Noncovered OREO
$
1,389
$
—
$
—
$
1,389
$
636
$
1,180
Covered OREO
1,837
—
—
1,837
226
422
$
3,226
$
—
$
—
$
3,226
$
862
$
1,602
Fair value at
June 30, 2013
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
Losses During the Three Months Ended
June 30, 2013
Losses During the Six Months Ended
June 30, 2013
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
(in thousands)
Impaired loans
$
4,198
$
—
$
—
$
4,198
$
656
$
730
Noncovered OREO
1,965
—
—
1,965
469
500
Covered OREO
395
—
—
395
29
94
$
6,558
$
—
$
—
$
6,558
$
1,154
$
1,324
The losses on impaired loans disclosed above represent the amount of the specific reserve and/or charge-offs during the period applicable to loans held at period end. The amount of the specific reserve is included in the allowance for loan and lease losses. The losses on OREO and OPPO disclosed above represent the write-downs taken at foreclosure that were charged to the allowance for loan and lease losses, as well as subsequent write-downs from updated appraisals that were charged to earnings.
33
Table of Contents
Quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements
The range and weighted-average of the significant unobservable inputs used to fair value our Level 3 nonrecurring assets, along with the valuation techniques used, are shown in the following table:
Fair value at June 30, 2014
Valuation Technique
Unobservable Input
Range (Weighted Average) (1)
(dollars in thousands)
Noncovered OREO
$
1,389
Fair Market Value of Collateral
Adjustment to Appraisal Value
N/A
(2)
Covered OREO
1,837
Fair Market Value of Collateral
Adjustment to Appraisal Value
N/A
(2)
(1) Discount applied to appraisal value, letter of intent to purchase, or stated value (in the case of accounts receivable, inventory and equipment).
(2) Quantitative disclosures are not provided for noncovered OREO and covered OREO because there were no adjustments made to the appraisal value during the current period.
Fair value at
June 30, 2013
Valuation Technique
Unobservable Input
Range (Weighted Average) (1)
(dollars in thousands)
Impaired loans
$
3,777
Fair Market Value of Collateral
Adjustment to Appraisal Value
N/A
(2)
Impaired loans - other collateral
(3)
421
Fair Market Value of Collateral
Adjustment to Stated value
(50%)
(4)
Noncovered OREO
1,965
Fair Market Value of Collateral
Adjustment to Appraisal Value
N/A
(2)
Covered OREO
395
Fair Market Value of Collateral
Adjustment to Appraisal Value
N/A
(2)
(1) Discount applied to appraisal value, letter of intent to purchase, or stated value (in the case of accounts receivable, inventory and equipment).
(2) Quantitative disclosures are not provided for impaired loans collateralized by real estate, noncovered OREO and covered OREO because there were no adjustments made to the appraisal value during the current period.
(3) Other collateral consists of accounts receivable and inventory.
(4) As there was only one impaired loan collateralized by other collateral, a range of discounts could not be provided.
34
Table of Contents
Fair value of financial instruments
Because broadly traded markets do not exist for most of the Company’s financial instruments, the fair value calculations attempt to incorporate the effect of current market conditions at a specific time. These determinations are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and do not include tax ramifications; therefore, the results cannot be determined with precision, substantiated by comparison to independent markets and may not be realized in an actual sale or immediate settlement of the instruments. There may be inherent weaknesses in any calculation technique, and changes in the underlying assumptions used, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows, could significantly affect the results. For all of these reasons, the aggregation of the fair value calculations presented herein do not represent, and should not be construed to represent, the underlying value of the Company.
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:
Cash and due from banks and interest-earning deposits with banks
—The fair value of financial instruments that are short-term or reprice frequently and that have little or no risk are considered to have a fair value that approximates carrying value (Level 1).
Securities available for sale
—Securities at fair value, other than U.S. Treasury Notes, are priced using a combination of market activity, industry recognized information sources, yield curves, discounted cash flow models and other factors (Level 2). U.S. Treasury Notes are priced using quotes in active markets (Level 1).
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
—The fair value is based upon the par value of the stock which equates to its carrying value (Level 2).
Loans
—Loans are not recorded at fair value on a recurring basis
.
Nonrecurring fair value adjustments are periodically recorded on impaired loans that are measured for impairment based on the fair value of collateral. For most performing loans, fair value is estimated using expected duration and lending rates that would have been offered on
June 30, 2014
or
December 31, 2013
, for loans which mirror the attributes of the loans with similar rate structures and average maturities. The fair values resulting from these calculations are reduced by an amount representing the change in estimated fair value attributable to changes in borrowers’ credit quality since the loans were originated. For nonperforming loans, fair value is estimated by applying a valuation discount based upon loan sales data from the FDIC. For covered loans, fair value is estimated by discounting the expected future cash flows using a lending rate that would have been offered on
June 30, 2014
(Level 3).
FDIC loss-sharing asset
—The fair value of the FDIC loss-sharing asset is estimated based on discounting the expected future cash flows using an estimated market rate (Level 3).
Interest rate contracts
—Interest rate swap positions are valued in models, which use readily observable market parameters as their basis (Level 2).
Deposits
—For deposits with no contractual maturity, the fair value is equal to the carrying value (Level 1). The fair value of fixed maturity deposits is based on discounted cash flows using the difference between the deposit rate and current market rates for deposits of similar remaining maturities (Level 2).
FHLB advances
—The fair value of Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle (the “FHLB”) advances is estimated based on discounting the future cash flows using the market rate currently offered (Level 2).
Repurchase Agreements
—The fair value of securities sold under agreement to repurchase is estimated based on discounting the future cash flows using the market rate currently offered (Level 2).
Other Financial Instruments
—The majority of our commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit carry current market interest rates if converted to loans, as such, carrying value is assumed to equal fair value.
35
Table of Contents
The following tables summarize carrying amounts and estimated fair values of selected financial instruments as well as assumptions used by the Company in estimating fair value at
June 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
:
June 30, 2014
Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
(in thousands)
Assets
Cash and due from banks
$
193,816
$
193,816
$
193,816
$
—
$
—
Interest-earning deposits with banks
30,646
30,646
30,646
—
—
Securities available for sale
1,590,017
1,590,017
20,338
1,569,679
—
FHLB stock
31,912
31,912
—
31,912
—
Loans
4,645,280
4,790,933
—
—
4,790,933
FDIC loss-sharing asset
27,981
9,502
—
—
9,502
Interest rate contracts
10,559
10,559
—
10,559
—
Liabilities
Deposits
$
5,985,069
$
5,983,825
$
5,513,961
$
469,864
$
—
FHLB Advances
110,587
111,060
—
111,060
—
Repurchase agreements
25,000
26,231
—
26,231
—
Interest rate contracts
10,559
10,559
—
10,559
—
December 31, 2013
Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
(in thousands)
Assets
Cash and due from banks
$
165,030
$
165,030
$
165,030
$
—
$
—
Interest-earning deposits with banks
14,531
14,531
14,531
—
—
Securities available for sale
1,664,111
1,664,111
20,114
1,643,997
—
FHLB stock
32,529
32,529
—
32,529
—
Loans held for sale
735
735
—
735
—
Loans
4,444,842
4,605,038
—
—
4,605,038
FDIC loss-sharing asset
39,846
11,248
—
—
11,248
Interest rate contracts
9,044
9,044
—
9,044
—
Liabilities
Deposits
$
5,959,475
$
5,958,747
$
5,449,546
$
509,201
$
—
FHLB Advances
36,606
35,080
—
35,080
—
Repurchase agreements
25,000
26,361
—
26,361
—
Interest rate contracts
9,044
9,044
—
9,044
—
36
Table of Contents
14.
Earnings per Common Share
The Company applies the two-class method of computing basic and diluted EPS. Under the two-class method, EPS is determined for each class of common stock and participating security according to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings. The Company issues restricted shares under share-based compensation plans and preferred shares which qualify as participating securities.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the
three
and
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
:
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
June 30,
June 30,
2014
2013
2014
2013
(in thousands except per share)
Basic EPS:
Net income
$
21,227
$
14,591
$
41,071
$
26,767
Less: Earnings allocated to participating securities
Preferred shares
41
29
79
30
Nonvested restricted shares
206
124
378
244
Earnings allocated to common shareholders
$
20,980
$
14,438
$
40,614
$
26,493
Weighted average common shares outstanding
52,088
50,788
51,600
45,099
Basic earnings per common share
$
0.40
$
0.28
$
0.79
$
0.59
Diluted EPS:
Earnings allocated to common shareholders (1)
$
20,981
$
14,441
$
40,617
$
26,495
Weighted average common shares outstanding
52,088
50,788
51,600
45,099
Dilutive effect of equity awards
406
1,337
863
659
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding
52,494
52,125
52,463
45,758
Diluted earnings per common share
$
0.40
$
0.28
$
0.77
$
0.58
Potentially dilutive share options that were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because to do so would be anti-dilutive
63
143
73
76
__________
(1)
Earnings allocated to common shareholders for basic and diluted EPS may differ under the two-class method as a result of adding common stock equivalents for options and warrants to dilutive shares outstanding, which alters the ratio used to allocate earnings to common shareholders and participating securities for the purposes of calculating diluted EPS.
15.
Subsequent Event
On
July 23, 2014
, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Intermountain Community Bancorp, an Idaho corporation (“Intermountain”). The Merger Agreement provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein, Intermountain will merge with and into Columbia (the “Merger”), with Columbia continuing as the surviving corporation. Immediately after the Merger, Panhandle State Bank, an Idaho state-chartered bank and wholly-owned subsidiary of Intermountain, will merge with and into our wholly-owned subsidiary, Columbia Bank. The closing of the transaction is subject to the satisfaction of certain customary conditions, including, among other things, the receipt of required regulatory approvals and the approval of Intermountain’s shareholders. Under the terms of the merger agreement, Intermountain shareholders are entitled to receive in respect of each share of Intermountain common stock, consideration in the form of cash, Columbia common stock or a unit consisting of a mix of
0.6426
of a share of Columbia common stock and
$2.2930
in cash. Based on Columbia’s closing stock price as of July 23, 2014, the merger consideration was valued at
$121.5 million
, or approximately
$18.22
per Intermountain share. The value of the merger consideration will fluctuate based on the value of Columbia’s stock until closing.
37
Table of Contents
Item 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements of Columbia Banking System, Inc. (referred to in this report as “we”, “our”, “Columbia” and “the Company”) and notes thereto presented elsewhere in this report and with the December 31,
2013
audited consolidated financial statements and its accompanying notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the following discussion, unless otherwise noted, references to increases or decreases in average balances in items of income and expense for a particular period and balances at a particular date refer to the comparison with corresponding amounts for the period or date one year earlier.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions that are not historical facts, and other statements identified by words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “should,” “projects,” “seeks,” “estimates” or words of similar meaning. These forward-looking statements are based on current beliefs and expectations of management and are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, these forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions with respect to future business strategies and decisions that are subject to change. In addition to the factors set forth in the sections “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this report, the following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results:
•
local and national economic conditions could be less favorable than expected or could have a more direct and pronounced effect on us than expected and adversely affect our ability to continue internal growth and maintain the quality of our earning assets;
•
the local housing/real estate markets where we operate and make loans could face challenges;
•
the risks presented by an uncertain economy, which could adversely affect credit quality, collateral values, including real estate collateral, investment values, liquidity and loan originations and loan portfolio delinquency rates;
•
the efficiencies and enhanced financial and operating performance we expect to realize from investments in personnel, acquisitions (including the proposed Intermountain merger) and infrastructure may not be realized;
•
the possibility that the proposed merger with Intermountain does not close in a timely manner or at all because required regulatory, shareholder or other approvals and other conditions to closing are not received or satisfied on a timely basis or at all;
•
the effect on the trading price of our stock if the merger with Intermountain is not completed;
•
the ability to successfully combine Columbia and the Intermountain organizations;
•
interest rate changes could significantly reduce net interest income and negatively affect funding sources;
•
projected business increases following strategic expansion or opening of new branches could be lower than expected;
•
changes in the scope and cost of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance and overall regulatory costs;
•
the impact of acquired loans on our earnings;
•
changes in accounting principles, policies, and guidelines applicable to bank holding companies and banking;
•
competition among financial institutions could increase significantly;
•
continued consolidation in the Pacific Northwest financial services industry resulting in the creation of larger financial institutions who may have greater resources could change the competitive landscape;
•
the goodwill we have recorded in connection with acquisitions could become impaired, which may have an adverse impact on our earnings and capital;
•
the reputation of the financial services industry could deteriorate, which could adversely affect our ability to access markets for funding and to acquire and retain customers;
•
our ability to effectively manage credit risk, interest rate risk, market risk, operational risk, legal risk, liquidity risk and regulatory and compliance risk; and
•
our profitability measures could be adversely affected if we are unable to effectively manage our capital.
You should take into account that forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report. Given the described uncertainties and risks, we cannot guarantee our future performance or results of operations and you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required under federal securities laws.
38
Table of Contents
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Management has identified the accounting policies related to the allowance for loan and lease losses, business combinations, acquired impaired loans, FDIC loss sharing asset and the valuation and recoverability of goodwill as critical to an understanding of our financial statements. These policies and related estimates are discussed in “Item 7. Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation” under the headings “Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses”, “Business Combinations”, “Acquired Impaired Loans”, “FDIC Loss Sharing Asset” and “Valuation and Recoverability of Goodwill” in our
2013
Annual Report on Form 10-K. There have not been any material changes in our critical accounting policies as compared to those disclosed in our
2013
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Our results of operations are dependent to a large degree on our net interest income. We also generate noninterest income through service charges and fees, merchant services fees, and bank owned life insurance. Our operating expenses consist primarily of compensation and employee benefits, occupancy, merchant card processing, data processing and legal and professional fees. Like most financial institutions, our interest income and cost of funds are affected significantly by general economic conditions, particularly changes in market interest rates, and by government policies and actions of regulatory authorities.
On April 1, 2013, the Company completed its acquisition of West Coast. The Company acquired approximately
$2.63 billion
in assets, including
$1.41 billion
in loans measured at fair value, and approximately
$1.88 billion
in deposits. Due to the timing of this acquisition, our results of operations for the six month period ended June 30, 2014 include the acquisition for the full six month period, however the prior year period only includes the acquisition for three months of the six month period. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited)” of this report for further information regarding this acquisition.
Earnings Summary
The Company reported net income for the
second
quarter of
$21.2 million
or
$0.40
per diluted common share, compared to
$14.6 million
or
$0.28
per diluted common share for the
second
quarter of
2013
. For the first
six
months of
2014
, the Company reported net income of
$41.1 million
, or
$0.77
per diluted common share, compared to
$26.8 million
, or
$0.58
per diluted common share, for the first
six
months of
2013
.
The increase in net income for the current quarter compared to the prior year period was due to a combination of higher noninterest income and lower noninterest expense, partially offset by a decrease in net interest income. The increase in net income for the first six months of 2014 compared to the same prior year period was due to higher net interest income and higher noninterest income, partially offset by higher noninterest expense.
Comparison of current quarter to prior year period
Revenue (net interest income plus noninterest income) for the
three
months ended
June 30, 2014
was
$89.8 million
,
3%
more than the same period in
2013
. The increase in revenue was a result of higher noninterest income due to a decrease in the expense recorded for the change in the FDIC loss-sharing asset, partially offset by a decrease in loan interest income as a result of lower incremental accretion on the acquired loan portfolios. For a more complete discussion of these topics, please refer to the net interest income and noninterest income sections contained in the ensuing pages.
The provision for loan and lease losses for the
second
quarter of
2014
was
$600 thousand
for the noncovered loan portfolio and
$1.5 million
for the covered loan portfolio compared to a provision of
$2.0 million
for the noncovered loan portfolio and a provision recapture of
$1.7 million
for the covered loan portfolio during the
second
quarter of
2013
. The small provision for the noncovered portfolio was primarily due to net charge-offs for the period, partially offset by improving asset quality metrics, and the provision for the covered loan portfolio was primarily due to a decrease in the expected present value of future cash flows as remeasured during the current quarter when compared to the prior quarter’s remeasurement.
Total noninterest expense for the quarter ended
June 30, 2014
was
$57.8 million
, down from
$64.5 million
for the
second
quarter of
2013
. The decrease from the prior-year period was primarily due to higher acquisition-related expenses recorded during the second quarter of 2013. For a more complete discussion of this topic, please refer to the noninterest expense section contained in the ensuing pages.
39
Table of Contents
Net income was negatively affected by the pre-tax earnings impact of the FDIC acquired loan portfolios for both the current and prior year periods. The negative effect of the FDIC acquired loan portfolios was larger in the prior year period primarily due to greater amortization of the FDIC loss-sharing asset recorded in the prior year period. The following table illustrates the impact to earnings associated with the Company’s FDIC acquired loan portfolios for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2014
2013
2014
2013
( in thousands)
Incremental accretion income on FDIC acquired loans
$
5,829
$
8,475
$
12,522
$
17,920
Recapture (provision) for losses on covered loans
(1,517
)
1,712
(3,939
)
732
Change in FDIC loss-sharing asset
(1)
(5,050
)
(13,137
)
(9,869
)
(23,620
)
FDIC clawback liability recovery (expense)
103
(199
)
(101
)
(430
)
Pre-tax earnings impact of FDIC acquired loan portfolios
$
(635
)
$
(3,149
)
$
(1,387
)
$
(5,398
)
__________
(1) For additional information on the FDIC loss-sharing asset, please see the “FDIC Loss-sharing Asset” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited)” of this report.
Comparison of current year-to-date to prior year period
Revenue (net interest income plus noninterest income) for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
was
$177.7 million
, compared to
$141.9 million
for the same period in
2013
. The increase in revenue was a result of higher net interest income and higher noninterest income primarily due to the timing of the acquisition of West Coast in the middle of the prior year period. For a more complete discussion of this topic, please refer to the net interest income section and noninterest income sections contained in the ensuing pages.
The provision for loan and lease losses for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
was
$100 thousand
for the noncovered loan portfolio and a provision of
$3.9 million
for the covered loan portfolio compared to a provision of
$1.0 million
for the noncovered loan portfolio and a provision recapture of
$732 thousand
for the covered loan portfolio during the first
six
months of
2013
. The
$100 thousand
provision for the noncovered loan portfolio was driven by net charge offs experienced during the period, partially offset by improving credit metrics within the noncovered loan portfolio. The
$3.9 million
in provision for losses on covered loans was primarily due to a decrease in the present value of expected future cash flows as remeasured during the current period when compared to the prior period’s remeasurement.
Total noninterest expense for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
was
$115.2 million
, a
12%
increase from the first
six
months of
2013
. The increase from the prior-year period was primarily due to the timing of the West Coast acquisition being in the middle of the prior year period. For a more complete discussion of this topic, please refer to the noninterest expense section contained in the ensuing pages.
Net Interest Income
Comparison of current quarter to prior year period
Net interest income for the
second
quarter of
2014
was
$75.1 million
, a decrease of
6%
from
$80.0 million
for the same quarter in
2013
. The decrease in net interest income was due to lower incremental accretion income on acquired loans. For additional information on the Company’s accounting policies related to recording interest income on loans, please refer to “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in our
2013
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Company’s net interest margin (tax equivalent) decreased to
4.86%
in the
second
quarter of
2014
, from
5.19%
for the same quarter last year. This decrease was also due to lower incremental accretion income on acquired loan portfolios. The Company’s operating net interest margin (tax equivalent) decreased modestly to
4.27%
from
4.34%
due to lower rates on loans.
40
Table of Contents
Comparison of current year-to-date to prior year period
Net interest income for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
was
$149.1 million
, an increase of
12%
from
$133.5 million
for the same period in
2013
. The increase in net interest income was primarily due to higher average loan balances during the current year as the acquisition of West Coast occurred in the middle of the prior year six month period. The Company’s net interest margin (tax equivalent) decreased to
4.86%
for the first
six
months of
2014
, from
5.13%
for the prior year period. The decrease in the Company’s net interest margin (tax equivalent) was primarily due to lower accretion income on the acquired loan portfolios. As shown in the table below, the Company recorded
$23.6 million
in total incremental accretion during the six months ended
June 30, 2014
, a decrease of $3.9 million from the prior year period. The Company’s operating net interest margin (tax equivalent) for the six months ended
June 30, 2014
decreased modestly to
4.23%
from
4.28%
due to lower rates on loans.
The following table shows the impact to interest income of incremental accretion income as well as the net interest margin and operating net interest margin for the periods presented:
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2014
2013
2014
2013
(dollars in thousands)
Incremental accretion income due to:
FDIC acquired impaired loans
$
5,734
$
7,837
$
12,223
$
16,212
Other FDIC acquired loans
95
638
299
1,708
Other acquired loans
5,481
9,635
11,096
9,635
Incremental accretion income
$
11,310
$
18,110
$
23,618
$
27,555
Net interest margin (tax equivalent)
4.86
%
5.19
%
4.86
%
5.13
%
Operating net interest margin
(tax equivalent)
(1)
4.27
%
4.34
%
4.23
%
4.28
%
__________
(1) Operating net interest margin (tax equivalent) is a non-GAAP measurement. See Non-GAAP measures section of Item 2, Management’s Discussion and Analysis.
41
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the average balances of all major categories of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the total dollar amounts of interest income on interest-earning assets and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, the average yield earned on interest-earning assets and average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities by category and in total net interest income and net interest margin:
Three Months Ended June 30,
Three Months Ended June 30,
2014
2013
Average
Balances
Interest
Earned / Paid
Average
Rate
Average
Balances
Interest
Earned / Paid
Average
Rate
(dollars in thousands)
ASSETS
Loans, excluding covered loans, net
(1) (3)
$
4,373,439
$
56,807
5.20
%
$
4,192,519
$
60,881
5.81
%
Covered loans, net
(2)
272,917
10,622
15.57
%
378,662
14,074
14.87
%
Taxable securities
1,281,753
6,382
1.99
%
1,328,806
4,890
1.47
%
Tax exempt securities
(3)
364,240
4,192
4.60
%
336,375
3,890
4.63
%
Interest-earning deposits with banks and federal funds sold
46,753
30
0.26
%
47,919
33
0.27
%
Total interest-earning assets
6,339,102
$
78,033
4.92
%
6,284,281
$
83,768
5.33
%
Other earning assets
130,462
113,403
Noninterest-earning assets
759,623
713,273
Total assets
$
7,229,187
$
7,110,957
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Certificates of deposit
$
480,459
$
325
0.27
%
$
590,261
$
535
0.36
%
Savings accounts
527,370
14
0.01
%
477,574
28
0.02
%
Interest-bearing demand
1,187,274
115
0.04
%
1,059,772
153
0.06
%
Money market accounts
1,612,607
275
0.07
%
1,858,974
338
0.07
%
Total interest-bearing deposits
3,807,710
729
0.08
%
3,986,581
1,054
0.11
%
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
(4)
68,306
115
0.67
%
106,309
849
3.19
%
Other borrowings
25,000
119
1.90
%
68,205
376
2.21
%
Total interest-bearing liabilities
3,901,016
$
963
0.10
%
4,161,095
$
2,279
0.22
%
Noninterest-bearing deposits
2,161,171
1,838,221
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities
82,073
60,261
Shareholders’ equity
1,084,927
1,051,380
Total liabilities & shareholders’ equity
$
7,229,187
$
7,110,957
Net interest income (tax equivalent)
$
77,070
$
81,489
Net interest margin (tax equivalent)
4.86
%
5.19
%
(1)
Nonaccrual loans have been included in the tables as loans carrying a zero yield. Amortized net deferred loan fees and net unearned discounts on certain acquired loans were included in the interest income calculations. The amortization of net deferred loan fees was $1.2 million and $840 thousand for the
three
months ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
, respectively. The accretion of net unearned discounts on certain acquired loans was
$5.6 million
and
$10.3 million
for the
three
months ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
, respectively.
(2)
Incremental accretion on acquired impaired loans is included in covered loan interest earned. The incremental accretion income on acquired impaired loans was
$5.7 million
and
$7.8 million
for the
three
months ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
, respectively.
(3)
Tax-exempt income is calculated on a tax equivalent basis. The tax equivalent yield adjustment to interest earned on noncovered loans was
$425 thousand
and
$118 thousand
for the
three
months ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
, respectively. The tax equivalent yield adjustment to interest earned on tax exempt securities was
$1.5 million
and
$1.4 million
for the
three
months ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
, respectively.
(4)
Federal Home Loan Bank advances includes a prepayment charge of
$1.5 million
during the
three
months ended June 30, 2013. As a result of the prepayment, the Company recorded $874 thousand in premium amortization, which partially offset the impact of the prepayment charge.
42
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the average balances of all major categories of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the total dollar amounts of interest income on interest-earning assets and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, the average yield earned on interest-earning assets and average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities by category and in total net interest income and net interest margin:
Six Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2014
2013
Average
Balances
Interest
Earned / Paid
Average
Rate
Average
Balances
Interest
Earned / Paid
Average
Rate
(dollars in thousands)
ASSETS
Loans, excluding covered loans, net
(1) (3)
$
4,311,118
$
111,753
5.18
%
$
3,380,360
$
94,045
5.56
%
Covered loans, net
(2)
280,915
21,574
15.36
%
390,954
29,066
14.87
%
Taxable securities
1,305,584
13,134
2.01
%
1,056,992
9,124
1.73
%
Tax exempt securities
(3)
358,497
8,301
4.63
%
303,122
7,457
4.92
%
Interest-earning deposits with banks and federal funds sold
36,043
44
0.24
%
184,581
234
0.25
%
Total interest-earning assets
6,292,157
$
154,806
4.92
%
5,316,009
$
139,926
5.26
%
Other earning assets
128,703
97,094
Noninterest-earning assets
765,849
574,140
Total assets
$
7,186,709
$
5,987,243
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Certificates of deposit
$
491,731
$
687
0.28
%
$
536,750
$
1,115
0.42
%
Savings accounts
520,678
28
0.01
%
402,584
44
0.02
%
Interest-bearing demand
1,178,042
223
0.04
%
950,352
331
0.07
%
Money market accounts
1,599,686
543
0.07
%
1,477,098
653
0.09
%
Total interest-bearing deposits
3,790,137
1,481
0.08
%
3,366,784
2,143
0.13
%
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
(4)
69,491
229
0.66
%
56,751
920
3.24
%
Other borrowings
25,000
238
1.90
%
46,722
495
2.12
%
Total interest-bearing liabilities
3,884,628
$
1,948
0.10
%
3,470,257
$
3,558
0.21
%
Noninterest-bearing deposits
2,145,407
1,545,749
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities
80,485
60,570
Shareholders’ equity
1,076,189
910,667
Total liabilities & shareholders’ equity
$
7,186,709
$
5,987,243
Net interest income (tax equivalent)
$
152,858
$
136,368
Net interest margin (tax equivalent)
4.86
%
5.13
%
(1)
Nonaccrual loans have been included in the tables as loans carrying a zero yield. Amortized net deferred loan fees were included in the interest income calculations. The amortization of net deferred loan fees was $2.1 million and $1.5 million for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
, respectively. The accretion of net unearned discounts on other FDIC acquired loans and other acquired loans was
$11.4 million
and
$11.3 million
for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
, respectively.
(2)
Incremental accretion on acquired impaired loans is included in covered loan interest earned. The incremental accretion income on acquired impaired loans was
$12.2 million
and
$16.2 million
for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
, respectively.
(3)
Tax-exempt income is calculated on a tax equivalent basis. The tax equivalent yield adjustment to interest earned on noncovered loans was
$782 thousand
and
$246 thousand
for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
, respectively. The tax equivalent yield adjustment to interest earned on tax exempt securities was
$3.0 million
and
$2.7 million
for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
, respectively.
(4)
Federal Home Loan Bank advances includes a prepayment charge of
$1.5 million
during the
six
months ended June 30, 2013. As a result of the prepayment, the Company recorded $874 thousand in premium amortization, which partially offset the impact of the prepayment charge.
43
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the total dollar amount of change in interest income and interest expense. The changes have been segregated for each major category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities into amounts attributable to changes in volume, changes in rates and changes in rates multiplied by volume. Changes attributable to the combined effect of volume and interest rates have been allocated proportionately to the changes due to volume and the changes due to interest rates:
Three Months Ended June 30,
2014 Compared to 2013
Increase (Decrease) Due to
Volume
Rate
Total
(in thousands)
Interest Income
Loans, excluding covered loans, net
$
2,547
$
(6,621
)
$
(4,074
)
Covered loans, net
(4,089
)
637
(3,452
)
Taxable securities
(179
)
1,671
1,492
Tax exempt securities
322
(20
)
302
Interest earning deposits with banks and federal funds sold
(1
)
(2
)
(3
)
Interest income
$
(1,400
)
$
(4,335
)
$
(5,735
)
Interest Expense
Deposits:
Certificates of deposit
$
(88
)
$
(122
)
$
(210
)
Savings accounts
3
(17
)
(14
)
Interest-bearing demand
17
(55
)
(38
)
Money market accounts
(43
)
(20
)
(63
)
Total interest on deposits
(111
)
(214
)
(325
)
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
(229
)
(505
)
(734
)
Interest expense
$
(551
)
$
(765
)
$
(1,316
)
44
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the total dollar amount of change in interest income and interest expense. The changes have been segregated for each major category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities into amounts attributable to changes in volume, changes in rates and changes in rates multiplied by volume. Changes attributable to the combined effect of volume and interest rates have been allocated proportionately to the changes due to volume and the changes due to interest rates:
Six Months Ended June 30,
2014 Compared to 2013
Increase (Decrease) Due to
Volume
Rate
Total
(in thousands)
Interest Income
Loans, excluding covered loans, net
$
24,478
$
(6,770
)
$
17,708
Covered loans, net
(8,423
)
931
(7,492
)
Taxable securities
2,354
1,656
4,010
Tax exempt securities
1,302
(458
)
844
Interest earning deposits with banks and federal funds sold
(181
)
(9
)
(190
)
Interest income
$
19,530
$
(4,650
)
$
14,880
Interest Expense
Deposits:
Certificates of deposit
$
(87
)
$
(341
)
$
(428
)
Savings accounts
10
(26
)
(16
)
Interest-bearing demand
67
(175
)
(108
)
Money market accounts
51
(161
)
(110
)
Total interest on deposits
41
(703
)
(662
)
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
170
(861
)
(691
)
Other borrowings
(211
)
(46
)
(257
)
Interest expense
$
—
$
(1,610
)
$
(1,610
)
Provision for Loan and Lease Losses
Comparison of current quarter to prior year period
During the
second
quarter of
2014
, the Company recorded a
$600 thousand
provision expense for the noncovered loan portfolio and provision expense of
$1.5 million
for the covered loan portfolio compared with a provision expense of
$2.0 million
and a provision recapture of
$1.7 million
, respectively, during the
second
quarter of
2013
.
The
$600 thousand
provision expense recorded during the current quarter for noncovered loan losses was primarily due to
net loan charge-offs experienced in the quarter, partially offset by improving asset quality metrics. The amount of provision was calculated in accordance with the Company’s methodology for determining the ALLL, discussed in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited)” of this report.
The
$1.5 million
in provision expense for losses on covered loans in the current period was primarily due to the decrease in the present value of expected future cash flows as remeasured during the current quarter, compared to the present value of expected future cash flows during the first quarter, net of the actual cash flows received during the quarter. The decrease in the present value of expected future cash flows was due to a decline in the credit quality of the covered portfolio, as measured by past due status. The
$1.5 million
in provision expense was substantially offset by a $1.2 million favorable adjustment to the change in FDIC loss-sharing asset.
45
Table of Contents
Comparison of current year-to-date to prior year period
The provision for loan and lease losses for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
was
$100 thousand
for the noncovered loan portfolio and
$3.9 million
for the covered loan portfolio compared with provision expense of
$1.0 million
and a provision recapture of
$732 thousand
, respectively, during the same period of
2013
. The
$3.9 million
in provision expense for losses on covered loans in the current period was primarily due to the decrease in the present value of expected future cash flows as remeasured during the current period, compared to the present value of expected future cash flows at the end of
2013
, net of activity during the period. The decrease in the present value of expected future cash flows was due to a decline in the credit quality of the covered portfolio, as measured by past due status. The
$3.9 million
in provision was substantially offset by a $3.1 million favorable adjustment to the change in FDIC loss-sharing asset.
The
$100 thousand
provision expense for noncovered loan losses was primarily due to net loan charge-offs experienced in the period, partially offset by improving asset quality metrics. Net noncovered loan charge-offs for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
were
$2.9 million
compared to
$1.6 million
for the same period of
2013
. The amount of provision was calculated in accordance with the Company’s methodology for determining the ALLL, discussed in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited)” of this report and was based upon improving credit metrics in the noncovered loan portfolio.
Noninterest Income
The following table presents the significant components of noninterest income and the related dollar and percentage change from period to period:
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2014
2013
$ Change
% Change
2014
2013
$ Change
% Change
(dollars in thousands)
Service charges and other fees
$
13,790
$
13,560
$
230
2
%
$
26,726
$
21,154
$
5,572
26
%
Merchant services fees
2,040
2,013
27
1
%
3,910
3,864
46
1
%
Investment securities gains, net
296
92
204
222
%
519
462
57
12
%
Bank owned life insurance
976
1,008
(32
)
(3
)%
1,941
1,706
235
14
%
Other
2,575
3,272
(697
)
(21
)%
5,408
4,900
508
10
%
Subtotal
19,677
19,945
(268
)
(1
)%
38,504
32,086
6,418
20
%
Change in FDIC loss-sharing asset
(5,050
)
(13,137
)
8,087
(62
)%
(9,869
)
(23,620
)
13,751
(58
)%
Total noninterest income
$
14,627
$
6,808
$
7,819
115
%
$
28,635
$
8,466
$
20,169
238
%
Comparison of current quarter to prior year period
Noninterest income was
$14.6 million
for the
second
quarter of
2014
, compared to
$6.8 million
for the same period in
2013
. The increase was primarily due to lower expense recorded for the change in FDIC loss-sharing asset, which was
$8.1 million
less in the current quarter compared to the second quarter of 2013.
The change in FDIC loss-sharing asset is a significant component of noninterest income. Changes in the asset are primarily driven by amortization of the asset and the provision recorded for reimbursable losses on covered loans. For the
second
quarter of
2014
, there was
$5.8 million
of amortization of the asset partially offset by a
$1.2 million
increase in the asset related to the provision recorded for reimbursable losses on covered loans. For the same period in
2013
, there was
$9.8 million
of amortization of the asset as well as a
$1.4 million
decrease in the asset related to the recapture of provision recorded for reimbursable losses on covered loans. For additional information on the FDIC loss-sharing asset, please see the “FDIC Loss-sharing Asset” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited)” of this report.
46
Table of Contents
Comparison of current year-to-date to prior year period
For the
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
, noninterest income was
$28.6 million
compared to
$8.5 million
for the same period in
2013
. The decrease was primarily due to lower expense recorded for the change in FDIC loss-sharing asset, which was
$13.8 million
less in the current period compared to the prior year period. The increase was also driven by an increase of
$5.6 million
in service charges and other fees due to the increased customer base from the West Coast acquisition, which occurred in the middle of the prior year six month period.
Noninterest Expense
The following table presents the significant components of noninterest expense and the related dollar and percentage change from period to period:
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2014
2013 (1)
$ Change
% Change
2014
2013 (1)
$ Change
% Change
(dollars in thousands)
Compensation and employee benefits
$
31,064
$
35,657
$
(4,593
)
(13
)%
$
62,402
$
57,310
$
5,092
9
%
All other noninterest expense:
Occupancy
8,587
7,543
1,044
14
%
16,831
12,296
4,535
37
%
Merchant processing
998
852
146
17
%
1,978
1,709
269
16
%
Advertising and promotion
950
1,160
(210
)
(18
)%
1,719
2,030
(311
)
(15
)%
Data processing and communications
3,680
3,638
42
1
%
7,200
6,218
982
16
%
Legal and professional services
2,303
5,504
(3,201
)
(58
)%
4,472
7,554
(3,082
)
(41
)%
Taxes, license and fees
1,051
1,204
(153
)
(13
)%
2,231
2,591
(360
)
(14
)%
Regulatory premiums
1,073
1,177
(104
)
(9
)%
2,249
2,034
215
11
%
Net cost of operation of noncovered other real estate owned
730
393
337
86
%
1,057
339
718
212
%
Net benefit of operation of covered other real estate owned
(827
)
(3,221
)
2,394
(74
)%
(1,008
)
(5,668
)
4,660
(82
)%
Amortization of intangibles
1,480
1,693
(213
)
(13
)%
3,060
2,722
338
12
%
Other (1)
6,675
8,904
(2,229
)
(25
)%
12,959
13,418
(459
)
(3
)%
Total all other noninterest expense
26,700
28,847
(2,147
)
(7
)%
52,748
45,243
7,505
17
%
Total noninterest expense
$
57,764
$
64,504
$
(6,740
)
(10
)%
$
115,150
$
102,553
$
12,597
12
%
__________
(1) Reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation. The reclassification was limited to removing the separate line item for FDIC clawback liability expense within noninterest expense and including the prior period activity in the line item for other noninterest expense.
Comparison of current quarter to prior year period
Total noninterest expense for the
second
quarter of
2014
was
$57.8 million
, a decrease of
$6.7 million
from a year earlier. The decrease from the prior year period was primarily due to acquisition-related expenses which were
$672 thousand
during the current quarter compared to
$9.2 million
for the prior year period. This decrease was partially offset by a decrease in the net benefit of operation of covered other real estate owned, which declined from
$3.2 million
to
$827 thousand
.
47
Table of Contents
Comparison of current year-to-date to prior year period
For the
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
, noninterest expense was
$115.2 million
, an increase of
$12.6 million
, or
12%
from
$102.6 million
a year earlier. The increase from the prior-year period was due to additional ongoing noninterest expense stemming from the growth resulting from the West Coast acquisition, which occurred in the middle of the prior year six month period. The increase in noninterest expense was also due to a reduction in the net benefit of covered other real estate owned.
The following table shows the impact of the acquisition-related expenses for the periods indicated to the various components of noninterest expense:
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
June 30,
June 30,
2014
2013
2014
2013
(in thousands)
Noninterest Expense
Compensation and employee benefits
$
73
$
3,416
$
654
$
3,416
Occupancy
547
228
686
233
Advertising and promotion
—
489
—
505
Data processing and communications
—
436
—
476
Legal and professional fees
26
3,522
213
4,030
Other
26
1,143
85
1,297
Total impact of acquisition-related costs to noninterest expense
$
672
$
9,234
$
1,638
$
9,957
The following table presents selected items included in other noninterest expense and the associated change from period to period:
Three Months Ended June 30,
Increase
(Decrease)
Amount
Six Months Ended June 30,
Increase
(Decrease)
Amount
2014
2013 (1)
2014
2013 (1)
(in thousands)
Postage
$
920
$
1,053
$
(133
)
$
1,822
$
1,526
$
296
Software support & maintenance
456
966
(510
)
1,006
1,328
(322
)
Supplies
376
481
(105
)
756
691
65
Insurance
398
593
(195
)
800
854
(54
)
ATM Network
179
728
(549
)
468
999
(531
)
Travel
527
502
25
949
772
177
Employee expenses
249
270
(21
)
548
469
79
Sponsorships and charitable contributions
519
364
155
1,121
609
512
Directors fees
162
175
(13
)
331
328
3
Federal Reserve Bank processing fees
69
48
21
136
93
43
CRA partnership investment expense
263
340
(77
)
529
340
189
Investor relations
140
196
(56
)
178
334
(156
)
Other personal property owned
(20
)
200
(220
)
(144
)
96
(240
)
FDIC clawback expense (1)
(103
)
199
(302
)
101
430
(329
)
Miscellaneous
2,540
2,789
(249
)
4,358
4,549
(191
)
Total other noninterest expense (1)
$
6,675
$
8,904
$
(2,229
)
$
12,959
$
13,418
$
(459
)
_________
(1) Reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation. The reclassification was limited to adding a separate line item for FDIC clawback liability expense to the table above as it is now a component of other noninterest expense.
48
Table of Contents
Income Taxes
We recorded an income tax provision of
$8.6 million
for the
second
quarter of
2014
, compared to a provision of
$7.4 million
for the same period in
2013
. For the
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
, we recorded an income tax provision of
$17.4 million
and
$12.3 million
, respectively, with an effective tax rate of
30%
and
32%
, respectively. Our effective tax rate remains lower than the statutory tax rate due to our nontaxable income generated from tax-exempt loans and municipal bonds, investments in bank owned life insurance, and low income housing credits. For additional information, please refer to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2013
.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Total assets were
$7.30 billion
as of
June 30, 2014
, an increase of
$135.9 million
, or
2%
from
$7.16 billion
at
December 31, 2013
. The increase was primarily due to increases in noncovered loans and cash and cash equivalents, partially offset by a decrease in investment securities.
Investment Securities
At
June 30, 2014
, the Company held investment securities totaling
$1.59 billion
compared to
$1.66 billion
at
December 31, 2013
. All of our securities are classified as available for sale and carried at fair value. The decrease in the investment securities portfolio from year-end is due to $114.0 million in maturities and sales and $7.3 million in premium amortization, partially offset by $22.8 million in purchases and a $24.4 million increase in fair value of securities in the portfolio. The average duration of our investment portfolio was approximately 3 years and 9 months at
June 30, 2014
. This duration takes into account calls, where appropriate, and consensus prepayment speeds.
The investment securities are used by the Company as a component of its balance sheet management strategies. From time-to-time, securities may be sold to reposition the portfolio in response to strategies developed by the Company’s asset liability committee. In accordance with our investment strategy, management monitors market conditions with a view to realize gains on its available for sale securities portfolio when prudent.
The Company performs a quarterly assessment of the debt and equity securities in its investment portfolio that have an unrealized loss to determine whether the decline in the fair value of these securities below their amortized cost basis is other-than-temporary. Impairment is considered other-than-temporary when it becomes probable that the Company will be unable to recover the entire amortized cost basis of its investment. The Company’s impairment assessment takes into consideration factors such as the length of time and the extent to which the market value has been less than cost, defaults or deferrals of scheduled interest or principal, external credit ratings and recent downgrades, internal assessment of credit quality, and whether the Company intends to sell the security and whether it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the security prior to recovery of its amortized cost basis. If a decline in fair value is judged to be other-than-temporary, the cost basis of the individual security is written down to fair value which then becomes the new cost basis. The new cost basis is not adjusted for subsequent recoveries in fair value.
When there are credit losses associated with an impaired debt security and the Company does not have the intent to sell the security and it is more likely than not that it will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis, the Company will separate the amount of the impairment into the amount that is credit-related and the amount related to non-credit factors. The credit-related impairment is recognized in earnings and the non-credit-related impairment is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income.
At
June 30, 2014
, the market value of securities available for sale had a net unrealized gain of
$8.0 million
compared to a net unrealized loss of
$16.4 million
at
December 31, 2013
. The change in valuation was the result of fluctuations in market interest rates subsequent to purchase. At
June 30, 2014
, the Company had
$742.7 million
of investment securities with gross unrealized losses of
$18.1 million
; however, we did not consider these investment securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired.
49
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth our securities portfolio by type for the dates indicated:
June 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
(in thousands)
Securities Available for Sale
U.S. government agency and government-sponsored enterprise mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations
$
862,618
$
948,408
State and municipal securities
380,506
364,470
U.S. government and government-sponsored enterprise securities
321,389
326,039
U.S. government securities
20,337
20,114
Other securities
5,167
5,080
Total
$
1,590,017
$
1,664,111
For further information on our investment portfolio see Note 4 of the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited)” of this report.
Credit Risk Management
The extension of credit in the form of loans or other credit products to individuals and businesses is one of our principal business activities. Our policies and applicable laws and regulations require risk analysis as well as ongoing portfolio and credit management. We manage our credit risk through lending limit constraints, credit review, approval policies, and extensive, ongoing internal monitoring. We also manage credit risk through diversification of the loan portfolio by type of loan, type of industry, type of borrower and by limiting the aggregation of debt to a single borrower. The monitoring process for our loan portfolio includes periodic reviews of individual loans with risk ratings assigned to each loan. We review these loans to assess the ability of the borrower to service all of its interest and principal obligations and, as a result, the risk rating may be adjusted accordingly. In the event that full collection of principal and interest is not reasonably assured, the loan is appropriately downgraded and, if warranted, placed on nonaccrual status even though the loan may be current as to principal and interest payments. Additionally, we review these types of loans for impairment in accordance with the Receivables topic of the FASB ASC. Impaired loans are considered for nonaccrual status and will typically remain as such until all principal and interest payments are brought current and the prospects for future payments in accordance with the loan agreement appear relatively certain.
Loan policies, credit quality criteria, loan portfolio guidelines and other credit approval processes are established under the guidance of our Chief Credit Officer and approved, as appropriate, by the Board of Directors. The Company’s Credit Administration department and loan committee have the responsibility for administering the credit approval process. As another part of its control process, we use an independent internal credit review and examination function to provide assurance that loans and commitments are made and maintained as prescribed by our credit policies. This includes a review of documentation when the loan is initially extended and subsequent monitoring to assess continued performance and proper risk assessment.
50
Table of Contents
Loan Portfolio Analysis
We are a full service commercial bank, which originates a wide variety of loans, and focuses its lending efforts on originating commercial business and commercial real estate loans.
The following table sets forth the Company’s loan portfolio by type of loan for the dates indicated:
June 30, 2014
% of Total
December 31, 2013
% of Total
(dollars in thousands)
Commercial business
$
1,735,588
39.0
%
$
1,561,782
37.0
%
Real estate:
One-to-four family residential
102,632
2.3
%
108,317
2.6
%
Commercial and multifamily residential
2,127,520
47.8
%
2,080,075
49.2
%
Total real estate
2,230,152
50.1
%
2,188,392
51.8
%
Real estate construction:
One-to-four family residential
61,481
1.4
%
54,155
1.3
%
Commercial and multifamily residential
134,140
3.0
%
126,390
3.0
%
Total real estate construction
195,621
4.4
%
180,545
4.3
%
Consumer
348,439
7.8
%
357,014
8.5
%
Subtotal
4,509,800
101.3
%
4,287,733
101.6
%
Less: Net unearned income
(57,126
)
(1.3
)%
(68,282
)
(1.6
)%
Total noncovered loans, net of unearned income
4,452,674
100.0
%
4,219,451
100.0
%
Less: Allowance for loan and lease losses
(49,494
)
(52,280
)
Noncovered loans, net
4,403,180
4,167,171
Covered loans, net of allowance for loan losses of ($19,801) and ($20,174), respectively
242,100
277,671
Total loans, net
$
4,645,280
$
4,444,842
Loans held for sale
$
750
$
735
Total noncovered loans increased
$233.2 million
, or
6%
, from year-end
2013
. The increase in noncovered loans was driven by significant originations during the period. The noncovered loan portfolio continues to be diversified, with the intent to mitigate risk by minimizing concentration in any one segment. The
$57.1 million
in unearned income recorded at
June 30, 2014
was comprised of $49.7 million in discount on acquired loans and $7.4 million in deferred loan fees. The
$68.3 million
in unearned income recorded at
December 31, 2013
consisted of $61.4 million in discount on acquired loans and $6.9 million in deferred loan fees.
Commercial Loans:
We are committed to providing competitive commercial lending in our primary market areas. Management expects a continued focus within its commercial lending products and to emphasize, in particular, relationship banking with businesses, and business owners.
Real Estate Loans:
One-to-four family residential loans are secured by properties located within our primary market areas and, typically, have loan-to-value ratios of 80% or lower at origination. Our underwriting standards for commercial and multifamily residential loans generally require that the loan-to-value ratio for these loans not exceed 75% of appraised value, cost, or discounted cash flow value, as appropriate, and that commercial properties maintain debt coverage ratios (net operating income divided by annual debt servicing) of 1.2 or better. However, underwriting standards can be influenced by competition and other factors. We endeavor to maintain the highest practical underwriting standards while balancing the need to remain competitive in our lending practices.
Real Estate Construction Loans:
We originate a variety of real estate construction loans. Underwriting guidelines for these loans vary by loan type but include loan-to-value limits, term limits and loan advance limits, as applicable. Our underwriting guidelines for commercial and multifamily residential real estate construction loans generally require that the loan-to-value ratio not exceed 75% and stabilized debt coverage ratios (net operating income divided by annual debt servicing) of 1.2 or better. As noted above, underwriting standards can be influenced by competition and other factors. However, we endeavor to maintain the highest practical underwriting standards while balancing the need to remain competitive in our lending practices.
51
Table of Contents
Consumer Loans:
Consumer loans include automobile loans, boat and recreational vehicle financing, home equity and home improvement loans and miscellaneous personal loans.
Foreign Loans:
The Company has no material foreign activities. Substantially all of the Company’s loans and unfunded commitments are geographically concentrated in its service areas within the states of Washington and Oregon.
Covered Loans:
Covered loans are comprised of loans and loan commitments acquired in connection with the 2011 FDIC-assisted acquisitions of First Heritage Bank and Summit Bank, as well as the 2010 FDIC-assisted acquisitions of Columbia River Bank and American Marine Bank. These loans are generically referred to as covered because they are generally subject to one of the loss-sharing agreements between Columbia Bank and the FDIC. The loss-sharing agreements relating to the 2010 FDIC-assisted transactions limit the Company’s losses to 20% of the contractual balance outstanding up to a stated threshold amount of $206.0 million for Columbia River Bank and $66.0 million for American Marine Bank. If losses exceed the stated threshold, the Company’s share of the remaining losses decreases to 5%. The loss-sharing agreements relating to the 2011 FDIC-assisted transactions limit the Company’s losses to 20% of the contractual balance outstanding. The loss-sharing provisions of the 2010 and 2011 agreements for non-single family and single family loans are in effect for five years and ten years, respectively, from the acquisition dates and the loss recovery provisions for such loans are in effect for eight years and ten years, respectively, from the acquisition dates. At
June 30, 2014
, approximately 94% of covered loans were subject to an FDIC loss-sharing agreement and approximately 88% were accounted for as acquired, impaired loans. The five year loss-sharing period for the loans subject to the non-single family loss-sharing agreements from the 2010 FDIC-assisted acquisitions will expire on March 31, 2015. Approximately 64% of the carrying value of our covered loans at
June 30, 2014
are covered under those 2010 loss-sharing agreements.
The following tables are a rollforward of acquired, impaired loans accounted for under ASC 310-30,
Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality
for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
:
Contractual
Nonaccretable
Accretable
Carrying
Cash Flows
Difference
Yield
Amount
(in thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2014
$
364,336
$
(11,855
)
$
(103,907
)
$
248,574
Principal reductions
(47,348
)
—
—
(47,348
)
Accretion of loan discount
—
—
20,624
20,624
Changes in contractual and expected cash flows due to remeasurement
5,973
1,742
(12,054
)
(4,339
)
Disposals
(8,116
)
151
2,826
(5,139
)
Balance at June 30, 2014
$
314,845
$
(9,962
)
$
(92,511
)
$
212,372
Contractual
Nonaccretable
Accretable
Carrying
Cash Flows
Difference
Yield
Amount
(in thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2013
$
556,108
$
(37,371
)
$
(166,888
)
$
351,849
Principal reductions
(74,550
)
—
—
(74,550
)
Accretion of loan discount
—
—
27,997
27,997
Changes in contractual and expected cash flows due to remeasurement
(11,621
)
17,223
(5,151
)
451
Disposals
(9,822
)
471
3,531
(5,820
)
Balance at June 30, 2013
$
460,115
$
(19,677
)
$
(140,511
)
$
299,927
For additional information on our loan portfolio, including amounts pledged as collateral on borrowings, see Note 5 and Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited)” of this report.
52
Table of Contents
Nonperforming Assets
Nonperforming assets consist of: (i) nonaccrual loans; (ii) other real estate owned; and (iii) other personal property owned.
Nonaccrual noncovered loans
:
The consolidated financial statements are prepared according to the accrual basis of accounting. This includes the recognition of interest income on the loan portfolio, unless a loan is placed on a nonaccrual basis, which occurs when there are serious doubts about the collectability of principal or interest. Generally, our policy is to discontinue the accrual of interest on all loans past due 90 days or more and place them on nonaccrual status. When a noncovered loan is placed on nonaccrual status, any accrued but unpaid interest on that date is removed from interest income.
Covered loans
:
We consider covered loans to be performing due to the application of the yield accretion method under ASC Topic 310-30. Topic 310-30 allows us to aggregate credit-impaired loans acquired in the same fiscal quarter into one or more pools, provided the loans have common risk characteristics. A pool is then accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. The covered loans acquired are and will continue to be subject to the Company’s internal and external credit review and monitoring. Any credit deterioration experienced subsequent to the initial acquisition will result in a provision for loan losses being charged to earnings. These provisions will be mostly offset by an increase to the FDIC loss-sharing asset and will be recognized in noninterest income.
The following table set forth, at the dates indicated, information with respect to our noncovered nonaccrual loans and total noncovered nonperforming assets:
June 30,
2014
December 31,
2013
(in thousands)
Nonperforming assets, excluding covered assets
Nonaccrual loans:
Commercial business
$
11,484
$
12,609
Real estate:
One-to-four family residential
3,024
2,667
Commercial and multifamily residential
11,039
11,043
Total real estate
14,063
13,710
Real estate construction:
One-to-four family residential
1,040
3,705
Total real estate construction
1,040
3,705
Consumer
4,026
3,991
Total nonaccrual loans
30,613
34,015
Noncovered other real estate owned and other personal property owned
15,203
23,918
Total nonperforming noncovered assets
$
45,816
$
57,933
Total assets
$
7,297,458
$
7,161,582
Covered assets, net
255,151
289,790
Noncovered assets
$
7,042,307
$
6,871,792
At
June 30, 2014
, nonperforming noncovered assets were
$45.8 million
, compared to
$57.9 million
at
December 31, 2013
. Nonperforming noncovered assets decreased $12.1 million during the
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
as a result of $6.2 million in loan payments, $5.4 million in loans returning to accrual status, $9.4 million in OREO sales, $4.7 million in loan, OREO, and OPPO write-downs, partially offset by $13.6 million in new nonaccrual loans. The percent of nonperforming, noncovered assets to period-end noncovered assets at
June 30, 2014
was
0.65%
compared to
0.84%
for
December 31, 2013
.
53
Table of Contents
Other Real Estate Owned:
During the
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
, noncovered OREO decreased
$8.6 million
. The following table sets forth activity in noncovered OREO for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
:
Six Months Ended June 30,
2014
2013
(in thousands)
Noncovered OREO:
Balance, beginning of period
$
23,834
$
10,676
Established through acquisitions
—
14,708
Transfers in, net of write-downs ($0 and $43, respectively)
2,334
4,777
Additional OREO write-downs
(1,565
)
(570
)
Proceeds from sale of OREO property
(10,298
)
(5,623
)
Gain on sale of OREO, net
898
371
Total noncovered OREO, end of period
$
15,203
$
24,339
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
We maintain an allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”) to absorb losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The size of the ALLL is determined through quarterly assessments of the probable estimated losses in the loan portfolio. Our methodology for making such assessments and determining the adequacy of the ALLL includes the following key elements:
1.
General valuation allowance consistent with the Contingencies topic of the FASB ASC.
2.
Classified loss reserves on specific relationships. Specific allowances for identified problem loans are determined in accordance with the Receivables topic of the FASB ASC.
3.
The unallocated allowance provides for other factors inherent in our loan portfolio that may not have been contemplated in the general and specific components of the allowance. This unallocated amount generally comprises less than 5% of the allowance. The unallocated amount is reviewed quarterly based on trends in credit losses, the results of credit reviews and overall economic trends.
On a quarterly basis our Chief Credit Officer reviews with Executive Management and the Board of Directors the various additional factors that management considers when determining the adequacy of the ALLL, including economic and business condition reviews. Factors which influenced management’s judgment in determining the amount of the additions to the ALLL charged to operating expense include the following as of the applicable balance sheet dates:
•
Existing general economic and business conditions affecting our market place
•
Credit quality trends
•
Historical loss experience
•
Seasoning of the loan portfolio
•
Bank regulatory examination results
•
Findings of internal credit examiners
•
Duration of current business cycle
•
Specific loss estimates for problem loans
The ALLL is increased by provisions for loan and lease losses (“provision”) charged to expense, and is reduced by loans charged off, net of recoveries or recapture of previous provision. While we believe the best information available is used by us to determine the ALLL, changes in market conditions could result in adjustments to the ALLL, affecting net income, if circumstances differ from the assumptions used in determining the ALLL.
In addition to the ALLL, we maintain an allowance for unfunded commitments and letters of credit. We report this allowance as a liability on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. We determine this amount using estimates of the probability of the ultimate funding and losses related to those credit exposures. This methodology is similar to the methodology we use for determining the adequacy of our ALLL. For additional information on our allowance for unfunded commitments and letters of credit, see Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements presented elsewhere in this report.
54
Table of Contents
At
June 30, 2014
, our ALLL for noncovered loans was
$49.5 million
, or
1.11%
of total noncovered loans (excluding loans held for sale) and
162%
of nonperforming, noncovered loans. This compares with an allowance of
$52.3 million
, or
1.24%
of total noncovered loans (excluding loans held for sale), and
154%
of nonperforming, noncovered loans at
December 31, 2013
. This decrease in the allowance relative to noncovered loans in the current period as compared to
December 31, 2013
reflects improvements in core asset quality during the current year. The increase relative to nonperforming, noncovered loans was the result of the nonperforming, noncovered loans decreasing by $3.4 million to $30.6 million in the current period as compared to $34.0 million as of
December 31, 2013
.
The following table provides an analysis of the Company’s ALLL for noncovered loans at the dates and the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2014
2013
2014
2013
(in thousands)
Beginning balance
$
50,442
$
51,119
$
52,280
$
52,244
Charge-offs:
Commercial business
(1,717
)
(961
)
(1,950
)
(2,275
)
One-to-four family residential
—
(28
)
(207
)
(144
)
Commercial and multifamily residential
(1,963
)
(614
)
(2,986
)
(1,397
)
One-to-four family residential construction
—
—
—
(133
)
Consumer
(909
)
(638
)
(1,636
)
(809
)
Total charge-offs
(4,589
)
(2,241
)
(6,779
)
(4,758
)
Recoveries:
Commercial business
1,712
352
2,202
465
One-to-four family residential
12
141
40
141
Commercial and multifamily residential
537
84
576
171
One-to-four family residential construction
442
49
484
2,188
Consumer
338
194
591
241
Total recoveries
3,041
820
3,893
3,206
Net charge-offs
(1,548
)
(1,421
)
(2,886
)
(1,552
)
Provision (recapture) for loan and lease losses
600
2,000
100
1,000
Ending balance
$
49,494
$
51,698
$
49,494
$
51,692
Total noncovered loans, net at end of period, excluding loans held of sale
$
4,452,674
$
4,181,018
$
4,452,674
$
4,181,018
Allowance for loan and lease losses to period-end noncovered loans
1.11
%
1.24
%
1.11
%
1.24
%
Allowance for unfunded commitments and letters of credit
Beginning balance
$
2,455
$
1,915
$
2,505
$
1,915
Net changes in the allowance for unfunded commitments and letters of credit
(100
)
550
(150
)
550
Ending balance
$
2,355
$
2,465
$
2,355
$
2,465
55
Table of Contents
FDIC Loss-sharing Asset
The Company has elected to account for amounts receivable under loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC as an indemnification asset in accordance with the Business Combinations topic of the FASB ASC. The FDIC indemnification asset is initially recorded at fair value, based on the discounted expected future cash flows under the loss-sharing agreements.
Subsequent to initial recognition, the FDIC indemnification asset is reviewed quarterly and adjusted for any changes in expected cash flows. These adjustments are measured on the same basis as the related covered loans. Any decrease in expected cash flows from the covered assets due to an increase in expected credit losses will increase the FDIC indemnification asset and any increase in expected future cash flows from the covered assets due to a decrease in expected credit losses will decrease the FDIC indemnification asset. Increases and decreases to the FDIC loss-sharing asset are recorded as adjustments to noninterest income.
At
June 30, 2014
, the FDIC loss-sharing asset was
$28.0 million
which was comprised of a
$25.0 million
FDIC indemnification asset and a
$2.9 million
FDIC receivable. The FDIC receivable represents the amounts due from the FDIC for claims related to covered losses the Company has incurred net of amounts due to the FDIC relating to shared recoveries.
The following table summarizes the activity related to the FDIC loss-sharing asset for the
three
and
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
:
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2014
2013
2014
2013
(in thousands)
Balance at beginning of period
$
36,837
$
83,115
$
39,846
$
96,354
Adjustments not reflected in income:
Cash payments from the FDIC
(3,442
)
(3,268
)
(1,765
)
(6,387
)
FDIC reimbursable losses (recoveries), net
(364
)
664
(231
)
1,027
Adjustments reflected in income:
Amortization, net
(5,764
)
(9,801
)
(12,216
)
(19,580
)
Loan impairment (recapture)
1,214
(1,370
)
3,151
(585
)
Sale of other real estate
(965
)
(2,251
)
(1,721
)
(3,597
)
Write-downs of other real estate
276
102
792
154
Other
189
183
125
(12
)
Balance at end of period
$
27,981
$
67,374
$
27,981
$
67,374
For additional information on the FDIC loss-sharing asset, please see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements presented elsewhere in this report.
Liquidity and Sources of Funds
Our primary sources of funds are customer deposits. Additionally, we utilize advances from the FHLB of Seattle, the FRB of San Francisco, and wholesale repurchase agreements to supplement our funding needs. These funds, together with loan repayments, loan sales, retained earnings, equity and other borrowed funds are used to make loans, to acquire securities and other assets, and to fund continuing operations.
Deposit Activities
Our deposit products include a wide variety of transaction accounts, savings accounts and time deposit accounts. Core deposits (demand deposit, savings, money market accounts and certificates of deposit less than $100,000) increased
$38.7 million
since year-end
2013
.
56
Table of Contents
We have established a branch system to serve our consumer and business depositors. In addition, management’s strategy for funding asset growth is to make use of brokered and other wholesale deposits on an as-needed basis. The Company participates in the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS
®
) program. CDARS
®
is a network that allows participating banks to offer extended FDIC deposit insurance coverage on time deposits. The Company also participates in a similar program to offer extended FDIC deposit insurance coverage on money market accounts. These extended deposit insurance programs are generally available only to existing customers and are not used as a means of generating additional liquidity. At
June 30, 2014
, CDARS
®
deposits and brokered money market deposits were
$67.1 million
, or
1%
of total deposits, compared to
$61.3 million
at year-end
2013
. The brokered deposits have varied maturities.
The following table sets forth the Company’s deposit base by type of product for the dates indicated:
June 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
Balance
% of
Total
Balance
% of
Total
(dollars in thousands)
Core deposits:
Demand and other non-interest bearing
$
2,190,161
36.6
%
$
2,171,703
36.4
%
Interest bearing demand
1,189,620
19.9
%
1,170,006
19.6
%
Money market
1,553,269
26.0
%
1,569,261
26.3
%
Savings
532,276
8.9
%
496,444
8.3
%
Certificates of deposit less than $100,000
269,721
4.4
%
288,943
4.9
%
Total core deposits
5,735,047
95.8
%
5,696,357
95.5
%
Certificates of deposit greater than $100,000
182,697
3.1
%
201,498
3.5
%
Certificates of deposit insured by CDARS®
18,690
0.3
%
19,488
0.3
%
Brokered money market accounts
48,408
0.8
%
41,765
0.7
%
Subtotal
5,984,842
100.0
%
5,959,108
100.0
%
Premium resulting from acquisition date fair value adjustment
227
367
Total deposits
$
5,985,069
$
5,959,475
Borrowings
We rely on FHLB advances and FRB borrowings as another source of both short and long-term funding. FHLB advances and FRB borrowings are secured by bonds within our investment portfolio, and residential, commercial and commercial real estate loans. At
June 30, 2014
, we had FHLB advances of
$110.6 million
compared to
$36.6 million
at
December 31, 2013
.
We also utilize wholesale repurchase agreements as a supplement to our funding sources. Our wholesale repurchase agreements are secured by mortgage-backed securities. At
June 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
, we had repurchase agreements of $25.0 million, which mature in 2018. Management anticipates we will continue to rely on FHLB advances, FRB borrowings, and wholesale repurchase agreements in the future and we will use those funds primarily to make loans and purchase securities.
Contractual Obligations, Commitments & Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We are party to many contractual financial obligations, including repayment of borrowings, operating and equipment lease payments, off-balance sheet commitments to extend credit and investments in affordable housing partnerships. At
June 30, 2014
, we had commitments to extend credit of $1.36 billion compared to $1.41 billion at
December 31, 2013
.
57
Table of Contents
Capital Resources
Shareholders’ equity at
June 30, 2014
was
$1.09 billion
, an increase from
$1.05 billion
at
December 31, 2013
. Shareholders’ equity was
15%
of total period-end assets at
June 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
.
Capital Ratios
: Banking regulations require bank holding companies to maintain a minimum “leverage” ratio of core capital to adjusted quarterly average total assets of at least 3%. In addition, banking regulators have adopted risk-based capital guidelines, under which risk percentages are assigned to various categories of assets and off-balance sheet items to calculate a risk-adjusted capital ratio. Tier I capital generally consists of preferred stock, common shareholders’ equity, and trust preferred obligations, less goodwill and certain identifiable intangible assets, while Tier II capital includes the allowance for loan losses and subordinated debt, both subject to certain limitations. Regulatory minimum risk-based capital guidelines require Tier I capital of 4% of risk-adjusted assets and total capital (combined Tier I and Tier II) of 8% to be considered “adequately capitalized”.
FDIC regulations set forth the qualifications necessary for a bank to be classified as “well capitalized”, primarily for assignment of FDIC insurance premium rates. To qualify as “well capitalized,” banks must have a Tier I risk-adjusted capital ratio of at least 6%, a total risk-adjusted capital ratio of at least 10%, and a leverage ratio of at least 5%. Failure to qualify as “well capitalized” can negatively impact a bank’s ability to expand and to engage in certain activities.
The Company and its banking subsidiary qualify as “well-capitalized” at
June 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
. The following table presents the regulatory standards for adequately capitalized and well-capitalized institutions and the capital ratios for the Company and its banking subsidiary at
June 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
:
Company
Columbia Bank
Requirements
June 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
June 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
Adequately
capitalized
Well-
Capitalized
Total risk-based capital ratio
14.52
%
14.68
%
13.75
%
13.52
%
8.00
%
10.00
%
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio
13.27
%
13.43
%
12.50
%
12.27
%
4.00
%
6.00
%
Leverage ratio
10.52
%
10.19
%
9.91
%
9.29
%
4.00
%
5.00
%
Stock Repurchase Program
In 2011, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing the Company to repurchase up to 2 million shares of its outstanding shares of common stock. The Company intends to purchase the shares from time to time in the open market or in private transactions, under conditions which allow such repurchases to be accretive to earnings per share while maintaining capital ratios that exceed the guidelines for a well-capitalized financial institution. No shares were repurchased under the stock repurchase program during the first
six
months of
2014
.
58
Table of Contents
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
The Company considers operating net interest margin (tax equivalent) to be an important measurement as it more closely reflects the ongoing operating performance of the Company. Despite the importance of the operating net interest margin (tax equivalent) to the Company, there is no standardized definition for it and, as a result, the Company’s calculations may not be comparable with other organizations. Also, there may be limits in the usefulness of this measure to investors. As a result, the Company encourages readers to consider its consolidated financial statements in their entirety and not to rely on any single financial measure.
The following table reconciles the Company’s calculation of the operating net interest margin (tax equivalent) to the net interest margin (tax equivalent) for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2014
2013
2014
2013
Operating net interest margin non-GAAP reconciliation:
(dollars in thousands)
Net interest income (tax equivalent) (1)
$77,070
$81,489
$152,858
$136,368
Adjustments to arrive at operating net interest income (tax equivalent):
Incremental accretion income on FDIC acquired impaired loans
(5,734
)
(7,837
)
(12,223
)
(16,212
)
Incremental accretion income on other FDIC acquired loans
(95
)
(638
)
(299
)
(1,708
)
Incremental accretion income on other acquired loans
(5,481
)
(9,635
)
(11,096
)
(9,635
)
Premium amortization on acquired securities
1,554
3,054
3,179
3,054
Interest reversals on nonaccrual loans
392
145
680
394
Prepayment charges on FHLB advances
—
1,548
—
1,548
Operating net interest income (tax equivalent) (1)
67,706
68,126
133,099
113,809
Average interest earning assets
$6,339,102
$6,284,281
$6,292,157
$5,316,009
Net interest margin (tax equivalent) (1)
4.86
%
5.19
%
4.86
%
5.13
%
Operating net interest margin (tax equivalent) (1)
4.27
%
4.34
%
4.23
%
4.28
%
__________
(1) Tax-exempt interest income has been adjusted to a tax equivalent basis. The amount of such adjustment was an addition to net interest income of
$1.9 million
and
$1.5 million
for the three months ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
, respectively, and
$3.8 million
and
$2.9 million
for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2014
and
2013
, respectively.
59
Table of Contents
Item 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
A number of measures are used to monitor and manage interest rate risk, including income simulations and interest sensitivity (gap) analysis. An income simulation model is the primary tool used to assess the direction and magnitude of changes in net interest income resulting from changes in interest rates. Basic assumptions in the model include prepayment speeds on mortgage-related assets, cash flows and maturities of other investment securities, loan and deposit volumes and pricing. These assumptions are inherently subjective and, as a result, the model cannot precisely estimate net interest income or precisely predict the impact of higher or lower interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes and changes in market conditions and management strategies, among other factors. At
June 30, 2014
, based on the measures used to monitor and manage interest rate risk, there has not been a material change in the Company’s interest rate risk since
December 31, 2013
. For additional information, refer to Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Company’s
2013
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) accumulated and communicated to our management (including the CEO and CFO) to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal controls over financial reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
60
Table of Contents
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013, we initially reported on an Objection to Personal Representative’s Petition and Petition for Surcharge of Personal Representative in Linn County Circuit Court that was served on West Coast Trust, which as a result of our acquisition of West Coast, is now a subsidiary of the Company. There have been no material developments in this case since the filing of our last report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 and the case remains on appeal.
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
Refer to Item 1A of Part I of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2013
for a discussion of risk factors relating to the Company’s business. The Company believes that there has been no material change in its risk factors as previously disclosed in the Company’s Form 10-K.
Item 2.
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
(a)
Not applicable
(b)
Not applicable
(c)
The following table provides information about repurchases of common stock by the Company during the quarter ended
June 30, 2014
:
Period
Total Number of Common Shares Purchased (1)
Average Price Paid per Common Share
Total number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan (2)
Maximum Number of Remaining Shares That May Be Purchased at Period End Under the Plan
4/1/2014 - 4/30/2014
2,259
$
27.43
—
2,000,000
5/1/2014 - 5/31/2014
691
24.70
—
2,000,000
6/1/2014 - 6/30/2014
—
—
—
2,000,000
2,950
$
26.79
—
(1)
Common shares repurchased by the Company during the quarter consist of cancellation of 2,950 shares of common stock to pay withholding taxes. During the three months ended June 30, 2014, no shares were repurchased pursuant to the Company’s publicly announced corporate stock repurchase plan described in (2) below.
(2)
The repurchase plan, which was approved by the Board and announced in 2011, originally authorized the repurchase of up to 2 million shares.
Item 3.
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
Item 4.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
Item 5.
OTHER INFORMATION
None.
61
Table of Contents
Item 6.
EXHIBITS
10.1*+
Change in Control Agreement between the Bank and Andrew McDonald dated June 1, 2014
31.1+
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2+
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32+
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101+
The following financial information from Columbia Banking System, Inc’s. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 is formatted in XBRL: (i) the Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity, (v) the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
+ Filed herewith
62
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
COLUMBIA BANKING SYSTEM, INC.
Date:
August 6, 2014
By
/s/ MELANIE J. DRESSEL
Melanie J. Dressel
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date:
August 6, 2014
By
/s/ CLINT E. STEIN
Clint E. Stein
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
63
Table of Contents
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
10.1*+
Change in Control Agreement between the Bank and Andrew McDonald dated June 1, 2014
31.1+
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2+
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32+
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101+
The following financial information from Columbia Banking System, Inc’s. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 is formatted in XBRL: (i) the Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity, (v) the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
+ Filed herewith
64