Covenant Logistics
CVLG
#6608
Rank
$0.68 B
Marketcap
$27.15
Share price
1.27%
Change (1 day)
23.02%
Change (1 year)

Covenant Logistics - 10-Q quarterly report FY


Text size:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549-1004





FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)
(X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2002

( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 0-24960

Covenant Transport, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Nevada 88-0320154
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. employer identification number)
incorporation or organization)
400 Birmingham Hwy.
Chattanooga, TN 37419
(423) 821-1212

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of registrant's
principal executive office)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing
requirements for at least the past 90 days.

YES X NO __

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of
common stock, as of the latest practicable date (May 3, 2002).

Class A Common Stock, $.01 par value: 11,756,803 shares
Class B Common Stock, $.01 par value: 2,350,000 shares

Exhibit Index is on Page 19












Page 1
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
<TABLE>
Page Number
<S> <C>
Item 1. Financial statements

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2001 and March 31, 3
2002 (Unaudited)

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31,
2001 and 2002 (Unaudited) 4

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months
ended March 31, 2001 and 2002 (Unaudited) 5

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) 6

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 11

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 18
</TABLE>


PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
<TABLE>
Page Number

<S> <C>
Item 1. Legal Proceedings 19

Items 2, 3, 4, and 5 Not applicable 19

Item 6. Exhibits and reports on Form 8-K 19

</TABLE>









Page 2
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

COVENANT TRANSPORT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands except share data)
<TABLE>
December 31, 2001 March 31, 2002
(unaudited)
--------------------- ----------------------
ASSETS
<S> <C> <C>
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 383 $ 366
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,623 in 2001 and
$1,700 in 2002 62,540 64,574
Drivers' advances and other receivables 4,002 4,481
Inventory and supplies 3,471 3,324
Prepaid expenses 11,824 10,799
Deferred income taxes 6,630 6,080
Income taxes receivable 4,729 4,729
--------------------- ----------------------
Total current assets 93,579 94,353

Property and equipment, at cost 369,069 383,286
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization 137,533 150,413
--------------------- ----------------------
Net property and equipment 231,536 232,873

Other 24,667 22,883
--------------------- ----------------------

Total assets $ 349,782 $ 350,109
===================== ======================

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Current liabilities:
Current maturities of long-term debt $ 20,150 $ 100
Securitization facility 48,130 48,130
Accounts payable 7,241 6,171
Accrued expenses 17,871 13,684
Insurance and claims accrual 11,854 13,715
--------------------- ----------------------
Total current liabilities 105,246 81,800

Long-term debt, less current maturities 29,000 53,000
Deferred income taxes 53,634 53,703
--------------------- ----------------------
Total liabilities 187,880 188,503

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders' equity:
Class A common stock, $.01 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized;
12,680,483 and 12,724,053 shares issued and 11,708,983 and 11,752,553 127 127
shares outstanding as of 2001 and 2002, respectively
Class B common stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized;
2,350,000 shares issued and outstanding as of 2001 and 2002 24 24
Additional paid-in-capital 79,832 80,306
Other comprehensive loss (748) 149
Treasury stock, at cost; 971,500 shares as of 2001 and 2002 (7,935) (7,935)
Retained earnings 90,602 88,935
--------------------- ----------------------
Total stockholders' equity 161,902 161,606
--------------------- ----------------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 349,782 $ 350,109
===================== ======================
</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.

Page 3
COVENANT TRANSPORT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2001 AND 2002
(In thousands except per share data)

<TABLE>
Three months ended March 31,
(unaudited)
2001 2002
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Freight revenue $ 131,329 $ 129,020
Fuel surcharge and other accessorial revenue 7,294 3,199
---------------------- ---------------------
Total revenue $ 138,623 $ 132,219

Operating expenses:
Salaries, wages, and related expenses 61,244 55,756
Fuel expense 26,383 22,086
Operations and maintenance 8,634 8,863
Revenue equipment rentals and purchased
transportation 16,915 14,803
Operating taxes and licenses 3,535 3,277
Insurance and claims 4,763 7,168
Communications and utilities 1,769 1,846
General supplies and expenses 3,327 3,511
Depreciation, amortization and impairment charge, including gains
(losses) on disposition of equipment (1) 9,401 14,058
---------------------- ---------------------
Total operating expenses 135,971 131,368
---------------------- ---------------------
Operating income 2,652 851
Other (income) expenses:
Interest expense 2,610 1,063
Interest income (127) (23)
Other (200) (223)
---------------------- ---------------------
Other (income) expenses, net 2,283 817
---------------------- ---------------------
Income before income taxes 369 34
Income tax expense 140 811
---------------------- ---------------------
Income (loss) before extraordinary loss on early
extinguishment of debt 229 (777)
Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of debt, net of
income tax benefit - 890
---------------------- ---------------------
Net income (loss) $ 229 $ (1,667)
====================== =====================
Net income (loss) per share
Basic and diluted:
Income (loss) before extraordinary loss on early
extinguishment of debt $ 0.02 $ (0.06)
Extraordinary loss, net of income tax benefit -- (0.06)
Total basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share: $ 0.02 $ (0.12)


Weighted average shares outstanding 13,948 14,084
Adjusted weighted average shares and assumed conversions
outstanding 14,208 14,084
</TABLE>

(1) Includes a $3.3 million pre-tax impairment charge in 2002.
Certain prior period financial statement balances have been reclassified to
conform to the current period's classification. See note 1.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.


Page 4
COVENANT TRANSPORT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2001 AND 2002
(In thousands)

<TABLE>
Three months ended March 31,
(unaudited)
--------------------------------------------

2001 2002
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 229 $ (1,667)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Net provision for losses on accounts receivables (188) 209
Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of debt - 890
Depreciation, amortization and impairment of assets (1) 9,050 13,552
Provision for losses on guaranteed residuals - 324
Deferred income tax expense 675 619
Equity in earnings of affiliate 262 -
(Gain)/loss on disposition of property and equipment (87) 506
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivables and advances 10,360 (1,208)
Prepaid expenses (102) 1,025
Tire and parts inventory (247) 147
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (1,980) (2,102)
------------------ -----------------
Net cash flows provided by operating activities 17,972 12,295

Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of property and equipment (23,810) (16,239)
Proceeds from disposition of property and equipment 7,756 790
------------------ -----------------
Net cash flows used in investing activities (16,054) (15,449)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Deferred costs (93) -
Exercise of stock options 53 475
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt 21,000 38,000
Repayments of long-term debt (24,385) (35,338)
------------------ -----------------
Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities (3,425) 3,137
------------------ -----------------
Net change in cash and cash equivalents (1,507) (17)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 2,287 383
------------------ -----------------

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 780 $ 366
================== =================
</TABLE>

(1) Includes a $3.3 million pre-tax impairment charge in 2002.


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.


Page 5
COVENANT TRANSPORT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1. Basis of Presentation

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Covenant Transport, Inc., a Nevada holding company, and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries ("Covenant" or the "Company"). All significant intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The financial statements have been prepared, without audit, in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, the accompanying
financial statements include all adjustments which are necessary for a fair
presentation of the results for the interim periods presented, such
adjustments being of a normal recurring nature. Certain information and
footnote disclosures have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules
and regulations. The December 31, 2001 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
was derived from the audited balance sheet of the Company for the year then
ended. It is suggested that these condensed consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2001. Results of operations in interim
periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for a full
year. Certain prior period financial statement balances have been
reclassified to conform with the current period's classification.

In the past, the Company has reported revenue net of fuel surcharges and
other accessorial revenue and has netted amounts against the appropriate
expense items. Effective January 1, 2002, the Company is now including
those items in revenue on its Statement of Operations. The prior period
Statement of Operations has been conformed with the reclassification.

Note 2. Basic and Diluted Earnings per Share

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the calculation of
net earnings per share included in the Company's Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Income:

(in thousands except per share data) Three months ended
March 31,
2001 2002
---- ----
Numerator:

Income (loss) before extraordinary loss on early
extinguishment of debt $ 229 ($777)
Extraordinary loss, net of tax benefit -- 890

Net earnings (loss) $ 229 ($1,667)

Denominator:

Denominator for basic earnings
per share - weighted-average shares 13,948 14,084

Effect of dilutive securities:

Employee stock options 260 -
----------- -----------

Denominator for diluted earnings per share -
adjusted weighted-average shares and assumed 14,208 14,084
conversions
Net income (loss) per share
Basic and diluted:
Income (loss) before extraordinary loss on early
extinguishment of debt $ 0.02 $(0.06)
Extraordinary loss -- (0.06)
Total basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share: $ 0.02 $(0.12)



Page 6
Note 3.  Income Taxes

Income tax expense varies from the amount computed by applying the federal
corporate income tax rate of 35% to income before income taxes primarily
due to state income taxes, net of federal income tax effect, plus the
effect of the per diem pay structure for drivers.

Note 4. Investment in Transplace

Effective July 1, 2000, the Company combined its logistics business with
the logistics businesses of five other transportation companies into a
company called Transplace, Inc. ("TPC"). TPC operates an Internet-based
global transportation logistics service and is developing programs for the
cooperative purchasing of products, supplies, and services. In the
transaction, Covenant contributed its logistics customer list, logistics
business software and software licenses, certain intellectual property,
intangible assets totaling approximately $5.1 million, and $5.0 million in
cash for the initial funding of the venture. In exchange, Covenant received
12.4% ownership in TPC. Upon completion of the transaction, Covenant ceased
operating its own transportation logistics and brokerage business, which
consisted primarily of the Terminal Truck Broker, Inc. business acquired in
November 1999. The contributed operation generated approximately $5.0
million in net brokerage revenue (gross revenue less purchased
transportation expense) received on an annualized basis. Initially, the
Company accounted for its 12.4% investment in TPC using the equity method
of accounting. During the third quarter of 2001, TPC changed its filing
status to a C corporation and as a result, management determined it
appropriate to account for its investment using the cost method of
accounting.

Note 5. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Effective January 1, 2002, the Company was required to adopt SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets ("SFAS No. 142"), which will require
the Company to evaluate goodwill and other intangible assets with
indefinite useful lives for impairment on an annual basis. Goodwill is
required to be tested for impairment within six months of adoption of SFAS
No. 142, with any resulting impairment recorded as a cumulative effect of a
change in accounting principle. The Company is currently evaluating its
goodwill for impairment and will have this completed by June 30, 2002.
Furthermore, any goodwill that was acquired in a purchase business
combination completed after June 30, 2001 will not be amortized. Goodwill
that was acquired in purchase business combinations completed before July
1, 2001 is no longer amortized after January 1, 2002. The impact of the
goodwill no longer being amortized was approximately $81,000 or less than
$.01 per share for the three-months ended March 31, 2002.

Note 6. Derivative Instruments and Other Comprehensive Income

In 1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133 (`SFAS 133"), Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended by Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 137, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities - Deferral of the Effective Date of SFAS
Statement No. 133, an amendment of SFAS Statement No. 133, and Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative
Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities, an amendment of SFAS Statement
No. 133. SFAS No. 133 requires that all derivative instruments be recorded
on the balance sheet at their fair value. Changes in the fair value of
derivatives are recorded each period in current earnings or in other
comprehensive income, depending on whether a derivative is designated as
part of a hedging relationship and, if it is, depending on the type of
hedging relationship.

The Company adopted SFAS No. 133 effective January 1, 2001 but had no
instruments in place on that date. During the first quarter of 2001, the
Company entered into two $10 million notional amount cancelable interest
rate swap agreements to manage the risk of variability in cash flows
associated with floating-rate debt. Due to the counter-parties' imbedded
options to cancel, these derivatives did not qualify, and are not
designated as hedging instruments under SFAS No. 133. Consequently, these
derivatives are marked to fair value through earnings, in other expense in
the accompanying statement of operations. At March 31, 2002, the fair value
of these interest rate swap agreements was a liability of $0.5 million.

The Company uses purchase commitments through suppliers to reduce a portion
of its cash flow exposure to fuel price fluctuations. At March 31, 2002,
the notional amount for fixed price normal purchase commitments for 2002
and 2003 is approximately 27.5 million gallons in the remainder of 2002 and
approximately 36.0 million gallons in 2003. In addition, during the third
quarter of 2001, the Company entered into two heating oil commodity swap
contracts to hedge its cash flow exposure to diesel fuel price fluctuations
on floating rate diesel fuel purchase commitments. These contracts are
considered highly effective in offsetting changes in anticipated future
cash flows and have been designated as cash flow hedges under SFAS No. 133.
Each calls for 4.5 million gallons of fuel purchases at a fixed price of
$0.695 and $0.629 per gallon before fuel taxes, respectively, through
December 31, 2002. These fuel hedge contracts were completely effective for
the quarter ending March 31, 2002. At March 31, 2002 the cumulative fair
value of these heating oil contracts was an asset of $0.2 million, which

Page 7
was  recorded in accrued  expenses  with the offset to other  comprehensive
income, net of taxes.

All changes in the derivatives' fair values were determined to be effective
for measurement and recognition purposes. The entire amount of gains and
losses are expected to be recognized in earnings within the next nine
months.

The derivative activity as reported in the Company's financial statements
for the period ended March 31, 2002 was (in thousands):

Net derivative liability at December 31, 2001 $ (1,932)
Changes in statements of operations:
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments that do not
qualify as hedging instruments:
Beginning liability balance (726)
Gain in value 223
--------------
Ending derivative liability balance (503)

Changes in other comprehensive income (loss) relating
to fuel
hedge contracts that qualify as cash flow hedges:
Beginning other comprehensive income (loss) (748)
Gain in value 1,447
Change in deferred taxes relating to other
comprehensive income (550)
--------------
Ending other comprehensive income 149
--------------
Deferred taxes 92
--------------
Ending derivative asset balance, gross 241
==============

Net derivative liability at March 31, 2002 $ (262)
==============

The following is a summary of comprehensive income (loss) as of March 31,
2001 and 2002.

<TABLE>
(in thousands) 2001 2002
----------------- ------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Net Income $ 229 ($1,667)

Other comprehensive income (expense)-
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedging derivatives,
net of taxes - 897

Comprehensive income (loss) $ 229 $ (770)
----------------- ------------------
</TABLE>

Note 7. Impairment of Equipment and Change in Estimated Useful Lives

For the past several quarters, the nationwide inventory of used tractors
has far exceeded demand. As a result, the market value of used tractors has
fallen significantly below both historical levels and the carrying values
on the Company's financial statements. The Company had extended the trade
cycle of its tractors from three years to four years during 2001, which
delayed any significant disposals into 2002 and later years. The market for
used tractors did not improve during the remaining portion of 2001.

The Company negotiated a tractor purchase and trade package with
Freightliner Corporation for calendar years 2002 and 2003 covering the sale
of model year 1998 through 2000 tractors and the purchase of an equal
number of replacement units. The significant difference between the
carrying values and the sale prices of the used tractors combined with the
Company's less profitable results during 2001 caused the Company to test
for asset impairment under applicable accounting rules. In the test, the
Company measured the expected undiscounted future cash flows to be
generated by the tractors over the remaining useful

Page 8
lives and the  disposal  value at the end of the useful  life  against  the
carrying values. The test indicated impairment, and during the fourth
quarter of 2001 and the first quarter of 2002, the Company recognized a
pre-tax charge of approximately $15.4 million and $3.3 million,
respectively, to reflect an impairment in tractor values. The charge
related to the Company's approximately 2,100 model year 1998 through 2000
in-use tractors. The Company incurred a loss of approximately $324,000 on
guaranteed residuals for leased tractors in the first quarter of 2002,
which was recorded in revenue equipment rentals and purchased
transportation in the accompanying statement of operations. The Company
accrued this loss from January 1, 2002 to the date the tractors were
purchased off lease in February 2002.

The approximately 1,400 model year 2001 tractors are not affected by the
impairment charges. The Company has evaluated the 2001 model year tractors
for impairment and determined that such units were not impaired. These
units are not expected to be disposed of for 24 to 36 months following
December 31, 2001. The Company has adjusted the depreciation rate of the
model year 2001 tractors to approximate its recent experience with
disposition values. Although management believes the additional
depreciation will bring the carrying values of the model year 2001 tractors
in line with future disposition values, the Company does not have trade-in
agreements covering those tractors. These assumptions represent
management's best estimate and actual values could differ by the time those
tractors are scheduled for trade. Management of the Company estimates the
impact of the change in the estimated useful lives and depreciation on the
2001 model year tractors to be approximately $2.2 million pre-tax or $.10
per share annually.

Note 8. Long-term Debt and Securitization Facility

Long-term debt consists of the following at March 31, 2002 and December 31,
2001:
<TABLE>
(in thousands) 2002 2001
----------------- ------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Borrowings under $120 million credit agreement 50,000 26,000
10-year senior notes - 20,000
Notes to unrelated individuals for non-compete
Agreements 100 150
Note payable to former SRT shareholder, bearing
interest at 6.5% with interest payable quarterly 3,000 3,000
----------------- ------------------
Total Long-Term Debt 53,100 49,150
Less current maturities 100 20,150
----------------- ------------------
Long-term debt, less current portion $53,000 $29,000
================= ==================
</TABLE>

In December 2000, the Company entered into a credit agreement (the "Credit
Agreement") with a group of banks with maximum borrowings of $120 million,
which matures December 13, 2003. The Credit Agreement provides a revolving
credit facility with borrowings limited to the lesser of 90% of the net
book value of eligible revenue equipment or $120 million. Letters of credit
are limited to an aggregate commitment of $20 million. The Credit Agreement
is collateralized by an agreement which includes pledged stock of the
Company's subsidiaries, inter-company notes, and licensing agreements. A
commitment fee is charged on the daily unused portion of the facility and
is adjusted quarterly between 0.15% and 0.25% per annum based on the
consolidated leverage ratio. At March 31, 2002, the fee was 0.25% per
annum. The Credit Agreement is guaranteed by all of the Company's
subsidiaries except CVTI Receivables Corporation ("CRC"). The Credit
Agreement includes a "security agreement" such that the Credit Agreement
may be collateralized by virtually all assets of the Company if a covenant
violation occurs. As of March 31, 2002, the Company had borrowings under
the Credit Agreement in the amount of $50.0 million with a weighted average
interest rate of 3.1% and the Company had borrowing availability of $70
million under the Credit Agreement.

On March 15, 2002 the Company retired its $20 million in senior notes due
October 2005 with an insurance company with borrowings from the Credit
Agreement. The term agreement required payments for interest semi-annually
in arrears with principal payments due in five equal annual installments
beginning October 1, 2001. Interest accrues at 7.39% per annum. The Company
incurred a $0.9 million after-tax extraordinary item ($1.4 million pre-tax)
to reflect the early extinguishment of this debt in the first quarter of
2002.

At March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, the Company has unused letters of
credit of approximately $15.2 and $12.6 million, respectively.



Page 9
Maturities  of  long  term  debt at  March  31,  2002  are as  follows  (in
thousands):

2002 $100
2003 50,000
2004 3,000

In December 2000, the Company entered into a $62 million revolving accounts
receivable securitization facility (the "Securitization Facility"). On a
revolving basis, the Company sells its interests in its accounts receivable
to CRC, a wholly-owned bankruptcy-remote special purpose subsidiary. CRC
sells a percentage ownership in such receivables to an unrelated financial
entity. The transaction does not meet the criteria for sale treatment under
SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets
and Extinguishments of Liabilities and is reflected as a secured borrowing
in the financial statements.

The Company can receive up to $62 million of proceeds, subject to eligible
receivables and will pay a service fee recorded as interest expense, as
defined in the agreement. The Company will pay commercial paper interest
rates plus an applicable margin on the proceeds received. The
Securitization Facility includes certain significant events that could
cause amounts to be immediately due and payable in the event of certain
ratios. The proceeds received are reflected as a current liability on the
consolidated financial statements because the committed term, subject to
annual renewals, is 364 days. As of March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001,
the Company had received $48.1 million in proceeds, with a weighted average
interest rate of approximately 2.0%.

The Credit Agreement and Securitization Facility contain certain
restrictions and covenants relating to, among other things, dividends,
tangible net worth, cash flow, acquisitions and dispositions, and total
indebtedness and are cross-defaulted. As of March 31, 2002, the Company is
in compliance with the Credit Agreement and Securitization Facility after
receiving a waiver under the Securitization Facility.

Note 9. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2001, the Financial Standards Board issued SFAS No. 143, Accounting
for Asset Retirement Obligations. SFAS No. 143 provides new guidance on the
recognition and measurement of an asset retirement obligation and its
associated asset retirement cost. It also provides accounting guidance for
legal obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived
assets. SFAS No. 143 is effective for the Company's fiscal year beginning
in 2003 and the Company is still evaluating the impact on the Company's
consolidated financial statements.

In August 2001, the Financial Standards Board issued SFAS No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. SFAS No.
144 provides new guidance on the recognition of impairment losses on
long-lived assets to be held and used or to be disposed of and also
broadens the definition of what constitutes discontinued operations and how
the results of discontinued operations are to be measured and presented.
SFAS No. 144 is effective for the Company's fiscal year beginning in 2002
and is not expected to materially change the methods used by the Company to
measure impairment losses on long-lived assets.

In April 2002, the Financial Standards Board issued SFAS No. 145,
Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB
Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections. SFAS No. 145 rescinds SFAS No.
4, Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt, and an amendment
of that statement, SFAS No. 64, Extinguishments of Debt Made to Satisfy
Sinking-Fund Requirements. This statement also rescinds SFAS No. 44,
Accounting for Intangible Assets of Motor Carriers. This statement amends
SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases, to eliminate an inconsistency between
the required accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and the required
accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that
are similar to sale-leaseback transactions. In addition, this statement
amends other existing authoritative pronouncements to make various
technical corrections, clarify meanings, or describe their applicability
under changed conditions. SFAS No. 145 is generally effective for the
Company's fiscal year beginning in 2003 with earlier application
encouraged. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this
standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.


Page 10
ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Covenant
Transport, Inc., a Nevada holding company, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries
("Covenant" or the "Company"). All significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Except for the historical information contained herein, the discussion in this
quarterly report contains forward-looking statements that involve risk,
assumptions, and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Statements that
constitute forward-looking statements are usually identified by words such as
"anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "projects," "expects," or similar
expressions. These statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are based
upon the current beliefs and expectations of the Company's management and are
subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ from
those set forth in the forward-looking statements. The following factors, among
others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those in
forward-looking statements: excess capacity in the trucking industry; surplus
inventories; recessionary economic cycles and downturns in customers' business
cycles; increases or rapid fluctuations in fuel prices, interest rates, fuel
taxes, tolls, and license and registration fees; increases in the prices paid
for new revenue equipment; the resale value of the Company's used equipment;
increases in compensation for and difficulty in attracting and retaining
qualified drivers and owner-operators; increases in insurance premiums and
deductible amounts relating to accident, cargo, workers' compensation, health,
and other claims; seasonal factors such as harsh weather conditions that
increase operating costs; competition from trucking, rail, and intermodal
competitors; regulatory requirements that increase costs or decrease efficiency;
and the ability to identify acceptable acquisition candidates, consummate
acquisitions, and integrate acquired operations. Readers should review and
consider the various disclosures made by the Company in its press releases,
stockholder reports, and public filings, as well as the factors explained in
greater detail in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K.

The Company's freight revenue before fuel surcharges and other accessorial
revenue decreased 1.8%, to $129.0 million in the three months ended March 31,
2002, from $131.3 million during the same period of 2001. The Company's growth
was affected by a 2.0% decrease in weighted average tractors partially offset by
a 0.4% increase in utilization. Due to a weak freight environment, the Company
has elected to constrain the size of its Company fleet until fleet production
and profitability improve.

The Company recognized an approximately $3.3 million pre-tax impairment charge
and an approximately $0.9 million after-tax extraordinary item to reflect the
early extinguishment of debt in the first quarter of 2002. Excluding the
impairment charge and extraordinary item, the Company's earnings improved to
$1.2 million during the first quarter of 2002 compared to $0.2 million during
the first quarter of 2001. The charge and the extraordinary item decreased the
Company's earnings to a $1.7 million loss for the three months ended March 31,
2002, from $0.2 million income during the same period of 2001.

Covenant reduced the number of teams in its historical operation during 2001 and
into 2002 as the economic recession resulted in decreased demand for expedited
service. The single driver fleets generally operate fewer miles per tractor and
experience a greater percentage of non-revenue miles. The additional expenses
and lower productive miles are expected to be offset by generally higher revenue
per loaded mile and the reduced employee expense of compensating only one
driver. The Company's operating statistics and expenses are expected to continue
to shift in future periods with the mix of single and team operations.

The Company continues to obtain revenue equipment through its owner-operator
fleet and finance equipment under operating leases. Over the past two years, it
has become more difficult to retain owner-operators due to the challenging
operating conditions. The Company's owner-operator fleet decreased to an average
of 348 in the first quarter of 2002 compared to an average of 383 in the first
quarter of 2001. Owner-operators provide a tractor and a driver and are
responsible for all operating expenses in exchange for a fixed payment per mile.
The Company does not have the capital outlay of purchasing the tractor. The
Company continues to use operating leases as a method of financing its
equipment. As of March 31, 2002, the Company had financed approximately 636
tractors and 2,564 trailers under operating leases as compared to 1,088 tractors
and 1,627 trailers under operating leases as of March 31, 2001. The payments to
owner-operators and the financing of equipment under operating leases are
recorded in revenue equipment rentals and purchased transportation. Expenses
associated with owned equipment, such as interest and depreciation, are not
incurred, and for owner-operator tractors, driver compensation, fuel, and other
expenses are not incurred. Because obtaining equipment from owner-operators and
under operating leases effectively shifts financing expenses from interest to
"above the line" operating expenses, the Company evaluates its efficiency using
pre-tax margin and net margin rather than operating ratio.

The Company's tractor leases generally run for a term of three years. With the
extension of the tractor's trade cycle to approximately four years, the Company
has been purchasing the leased tractors at the expiration of the lease term,
although there is no commitment to purchase the tractors. To date the purchases
have been financed through the Company's line of credit. The tractors are then
accounted as owned equipment. Trailer leases generally run for a term of seven
years with the first leases expiring in 2005. The Company has not determined
whether it anticipates purchasing trailers at the end of these leases.

Page 11
The following  table sets forth the percentage  relationship of certain items to
freight revenue:

Three Months Ended March 31,

2001 2002
--------------- --------------
Freight revenue (1) 100.0% 100.0%
Operating expenses:
Salaries, wages, and related expenses (1) 45.7 42.1
Fuel expense (1) 15.8 16.1
Operations and maintenance (1) 6.3 6.5
Revenue equipment rentals and purchased
transportation 12.9 11.5
Operating taxes and licenses 2.7 2.6
Insurance and claims 3.6 5.6
Communications and utilities 1.3 1.4
General supplies and expenses 2.5 2.7
Depreciation and amortization (2) 7.2 10.9
--------------- --------------
Total operating expenses 98.0 99.4
--------------- --------------
Operating income 2.0 0.6
Other (income) expense, net 1.7 0.6
--------------- --------------
Income before income taxes 0.3 0.0
Income tax expense 0.1 0.6
--------------- --------------
Income (loss) before extraordinary loss on
early extinguishment of debt 0.2 (0.6)
Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of
debt, net of income tax benefit -- (0.7)
--------------- --------------

Net income (loss) 0.2% (1.3%)
=============== ==============

(1) Freight revenue is total revenue less fuel surcharge and accessorial
revenue. In this table, fuel surcharge and other accessorial revenue are
shown netted against the appropriate expense category (Fuel expense, $5.7
million in 2001 and $1.3 million in 2002, Salaries, wages, and related
expenses, $1.2 million in 2001 and $1.4 million in 2002, Operations and
maintenance, $0.4 million in 2001 and $0.4 million in 2002.)

(2) Includes a $3.3 million pre-tax impairment charge or 2.6% of revenue in
2002.

COMPARISON OF THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002 TO THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 2001

Freight revenue (total revenue before fuel surcharge and other accessorial
revenue) decreased $2.3 million (1.8%), to $129.0 million in the three months
ended March 31, 2002, from $131.3 million in the same period of 2001. The
Company's growth was affected by a 2.0% decrease in weighted average tractors
partially offset by a 0.4% increase in utilization. Revenue per tractor per week
increased to $2,680 in the 2002 period from $2,666 in the 2001 period. Weighted
average tractors decreased to 3,713 in the 2002 period from 3,788 in the 2001
period. Due to a weak freight environment, the Company has elected to constrain
the size of its tractor fleet until fleet production and profitability improve.

Salaries, wages, and related expenses, net of accessorial revenue of $1.4
million in the first quarter of 2002 and $1.2 million in the first quarter of
2001, decreased $5.7 million (9.5%), to $54.3 million in the first quarter of
2002, from $60.0 million in the first quarter of 2001. As a percentage of
freight revenue, salaries, wages, and related expenses decreased to 42.1% in the
2002 period, from 45.7% in the 2001 period. Even though the percentage of total
miles driven by company trucks increased (90.3% in 2002 vs. 88.9% in 2001),
wages for over the road drivers as a percentage of freight revenue decreased to
29.3% in 2002 from 32.4% in 2001. The decrease was partially due to the Company
implementing cost reduction strategies including a per diem pay program for its
drivers during August 2001. The Company's payroll expense for employees other
than over the road drivers increased to 7.0% of freight revenue in the 2002
period from 6.7% of freight revenue in the 2001 period due to growth in
headcount and local drivers in the dedicated fleet. Health insurance, employer
paid taxes, and workers' compensation decreased to 6.5% of freight revenue in
the 2002 period, from 7.4% in the 2001 period. The decrease as a percentage of
freight revenue was primarily the result of lower employer paid taxes related to
lower wage expense in the 2002 period as compared to the 2001 period.

Fuel expense, net of fuel surcharge revenue of $1.3 million in the first quarter
of 2002 and $5.7 million in the first quarter of 2001, increased $0.1 million
(0.4%), to $20.8 million in the first quarter of 2002, from $20.7 million in the
first quarter of 2001. As a percentage of freight revenue, fuel expense
increased to 16.1% in the 2002 period from 15.8% in the 2001 period. This
increase was due to the increased usage of company trucks (due to the decrease
in the Company's utilization of owner-operators, who pay for their

Page 12
own fuel  purchases),  lower  quantities  and  less  efficient  pricing  of fuel
contracted using purchase commitments, and slightly lower fuel economy. These
increases were partially offset by fuel surcharges, which amounted to $.012 per
loaded mile or approximately $1.3 million in the 2002 period compared to $.053
per loaded mile or approximately $5.7 million in the 2001 period. Fuel costs may
be affected in the future by lower fuel mileage if government mandated emissions
standards effective October 1, 2002, are implemented as scheduled.

Operations and maintenance, net of accessorial revenue of $0.4 million in the
first quarter of 2002 and $0.4 million in the first quarter of 2001, consisting
primarily of vehicle maintenance, repairs and driver recruitment expenses,
increased $0.2 million (1.8%), to $8.4 million in the first quarter of 2002,
from $8.3 million in the first quarter of 2001. As a percentage of freight
revenue, operations and maintenance increased to 6.5% in the 2002 period, from
6.3% in the 2001 period. The Company extended the trade cycle on its tractor
fleet from three years to four years, which resulted in an increase in the
number of required repairs.

Revenue equipment rentals and purchased transportation decreased $2.1 million
(12.5%), to $14.8 million in the first quarter of 2002, from $16.9 million in
the first quarter of 2001. As a percentage of freight revenue, revenue equipment
rentals and purchased transportation decreased to 11.5% in the 2002 period from
12.9% in the 2001 period. The decrease was primarily the result of a smaller
fleet of owner-operators during 2002 (an average of 348 in 2002 compared to an
average of 383 in 2001). Over the past year, it has become more difficult to
retain owner-operators due to the challenging operating conditions. The smaller
fleet resulted in lower payments to owner operators (7.5% of freight revenue in
2002 compared to 8.8% of freight revenue in 2001). Owner-operators are
independent contractors, who provide a tractor and driver and cover all of their
operating expenses in exchange for a fixed payment per mile. Accordingly,
expenses such as driver salaries, fuel, repairs, depreciation, and interest
normally associated with Company-owned equipment are consolidated in revenue
equipment rentals and purchased transportation when owner-operators are
utilized. As of March 31, 2002, the Company had financed approximately 636
tractors and 2,564 trailers under operating leases as compared to 1,088 tractors
and 1,627 trailers under operating leases as of March 31, 2001.

Operating taxes and licenses decreased $0.3 million (7.3%), to $3.3 million in
the first quarter of 2002, from $3.5 million in the first quarter of 2001. As a
percentage of freight revenue, operating taxes and licenses remained essentially
constant at 2.6% in the first quarter of 2002 and 2.7% in the first quarter of
2001.

Insurance and claims, consisting primarily of premiums and deductible amounts
for liability, physical damage, and cargo damage insurance and claims, increased
$2.4 million (50.5%), to $7.2 million in the first quarter of 2002 from $4.8
million in the first quarter of 2001. As a percentage of freight revenue,
insurance increased to 5.6% in the 2002 period from 3.6% in the 2001 period. The
increase is a result of an industry-wide increase in insurance rates, which the
Company addressed by adopting an insurance program with significantly higher
deductible exposure that is partially offset by lower premium rates. The
deductible amount increased from $5,000 in 2000 to $250,000 in 2001. In March
2002, the Company increased its deductible to $500,000. The Company's insurance
program for liability, physical damage, and cargo damage involves self-insurance
with varying risk retention levels. Claims in excess of these risk retention
levels are covered by insurance in amounts which management considers adequate.
The Company accrues the estimated cost of the uninsured portion of pending
claims. These accruals are based on management's evaluation of the nature and
severity of the claim and estimates of future claims development based on
historical trends. Insurance and claims expense will vary based on the frequency
and severity of claims, the premium expense, and the level of self insured
retention.

Communications and utilities expense was $1.8 million for the first quarters of
2002 and 2001. As a percentage of freight revenue, communications and utilities
remained essentially constant at 1.4% in the 2002 period as compared to 1.3% in
the 2001 period.

General supplies and expenses, consisting primarily of headquarters and other
terminal facilities expenses, increased $0.2 million (5.5%), to $3.5 million in
the first quarter of 2002, from $3.3 million in the first quarter of 2001. As a
percentage of freight revenue, general supplies and expenses increased to 2.7%
in the 2002 period from 2.5% in the 2001 period.

Depreciation, amortization and impairment charge, consisting primarily of
depreciation of revenue equipment, increased $4.7 million (49.5%), to $14.1
million in the first quarter of 2002 from $9.4 million in the first quarter of
2001. As a percentage of freight revenue, depreciation and amortization
increased to 10.9% in the 2002 period from 7.2% in the 2001 period. The increase
is primarily the result of a $3.3 million pre-tax impairment charge related to
approximately 327 model year 1998 through 2000 in use tractors. See "Impairment
of Tractor Values and Future Expense" below for additional information. The
Company's approximately 1,400 model year 2001 tractors are not affected by the
charge. The Company has increased the annual depreciation expense on the 2001
model year tractors to approximate the Company's recent experience with
disposition values. Depreciation and amortization expense is net of any gain or
loss on the disposal of tractors and trailers. Loss on the disposal of tractors
and trailers was approximately $0.5 million in the 2002 period compared to a
gain of $0.1 million in the 2001 period. Amortization expense relates to
deferred debt costs incurred and covenants not to compete from five
acquisitions. Goodwill amortization ceased beginning January 1, 2002, in
accordance with SFAS No. 142, and the Company will evaluate goodwill and certain
intangibles for impairment, annually prospectively beginning in 2002. The impact
of goodwill no longer being amortized was approximately $81,000 for the three
months ended March 31, 2002.

Page 13
Other expense, net, decreased $1.5 million (64.2%), to $0.8 million in the first
quarter of 2002, from $2.3 million in the first quarter of 2001. As a percentage
of freight revenue, other expense decreased to 0.6% in the 2002 period from 1.7%
in the 2001 period. Included in the other expense category are interest expense,
interest income, and a $0.2 million pre-tax non-cash gain related to the
accounting for interest rate derivatives under SFAS 133. The decrease was the
result of lower debt balances and more favorable interest rates.

During the first quarter of 2002, the Company prepaid the remaining $20 million
in previously outstanding 7.39% ten year, private placement notes with
borrowings from the Credit Agreement. In conjunction with the prepayment of the
borrowings, the Company recognized an approximate $0.9 million after-tax
extraordinary item to reflect the early extinguishment of debt. The losses
related to the write off of debt issuance and other deferred financing costs and
a premium paid on the retirement of the notes.

As a result of the foregoing, the Company's pretax margin decreased to
approximately break even in the 2002 period from 0.3% in the 2001 period.

The Company's income tax expense for the first quarter of 2002 was $0.8 million.
The Company's income tax expense for the first quarter of 2001 was $0.1 million
or 37.9% of earnings before income taxes. In 2002, the effective tax rate is
different from the expected combined tax rate due to permanent differences
related to a per diem pay structure implemented during the third quarter of
2001. Due to the nondeductible effect of per diem, the Company's tax rate will
fluctuate in future periods as earnings fluctuate.

Primarily as a result of the factors described above, net earnings decreased
$1.9 million, to a $1.7 million loss in the 2002 period from $0.2 million in the
2001 period. Excluding the $3.3 million pre-tax charge for impairment and the
$0.9 million after-tax extraordinary item, net income and earnings per share for
the first quarter of 2002 would have been $1.2 million and $0.09, respectively.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Historically the Company's growth has required significant capital investments.
The Company historically has financed its expansion requirements with borrowings
under a line of credit, cash flows from operations, long-term operating leases,
and borrowings under installment notes payable to commercial lending
institutions and equipment manufacturers. The Company's primary sources of
liquidity at March 31, 2002, were funds provided by operations, proceeds under
the Securitization Facility (as defined below), borrowings under its primary
credit agreement, which had maximum available borrowing of $120.0 million at
March 31, 2002 (the "Credit Agreement") and operating leases of revenue
equipment. The Company believes its sources of liquidity are adequate to meet
its current and projected needs for at least the next twelve months.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $11.0 million in the first quarter
of 2002 and $18.0 million in the first quarter of 2001. The decrease in cash
flows from operations in 2002 was primarily due to lower earnings and that the
2001 period included an unusually large collection of receivables that had
resulted from billing problems in 2000, offset by an increase in depreciation,
amortization and impairment charge associated with the $3.3 million pre-tax
impairment charge.

Net cash used in investing activities was $15.4 million in the first quarter of
2002 and $16.1 million in the first quarter of 2001. The cash used in 2002
related to the financing of tractors, which were previously financed through
operating leases, using proceeds from the Credit Agreement. In 2001,
approximately $15 million was related to the financing of the Company's
headquarters facility, which was previously financed through an operating lease
that expired in March 2001. The Company financed the facility using proceeds
from the Credit Agreement. Anticipated capital expenditures are expected to
increase in 2002 as the Company has agreed to purchase and trade approximately
1,000 tractors and expects to purchase and trade a significant number of
trailers if an acceptable arrangement can be reached. During 2000 and 2001,
capital expenditures were lower than previous years due to the Company's
decision to slow fleet growth. The Company expects capital expenditures,
primarily for revenue equipment (net of trade-ins) to be approximately $75.0
million in 2002, exclusive of acquisitions.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $4.4 million in the first quarter
of 2002 and $3.4 million was used in the first quarter of 2001. At March 31,
2002, the Company had outstanding debt of $101.2 million, primarily consisting
of $48.1 million in the Securitization Facility and $50.0 million drawn under
the Credit Agreement. Interest rates on this debt range from 1.8% to 6.5%.

During the first quarter of 2002, the Company prepaid the remaining $20.0
million in previously outstanding 7.39% ten year private placement notes with
borrowings from the Credit Agreement. In conjunction with the prepayment of the
borrowings, the Company recognized an approximate $0.9 million after-tax
extraordinary item to reflect the early extinguishment of debt.

In December 2000, the Company entered into the Credit Agreement with a group of
banks, which matures December 2003. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement are
based on the banks' base rate or LIBOR and accrue interest based on one, two, or
three month LIBOR rates plus an applicable margin that is adjusted quarterly
between 0.75% and 1.25% based on cash flow coverage. At March 31, 2002, the
margin was 1.25%. The Credit Agreement is guaranteed by the Company and all of
the Company's subsidiaries except CVTI Receivables Corp.
Page 14
The Credit Agreement has a maximum borrowing limit of $120.0 million. Borrowings
related to revenue equipment are limited to the lesser of 90% of net book value
of revenue equipment or $120.0 million. Letters of credit are limited to an
aggregate commitment of $20.0 million. The Credit Agreement includes a "security
agreement" such that the Credit Agreement may be collateralized by virtually all
assets of the Company if a covenant violation occurs. A commitment fee, that is
adjusted quarterly between 0.15% and 0.25% per annum based on cash flow
coverage, is due on the daily unused portion of the Credit Agreement. As of
March 31, 2002, the Company had borrowings under the Credit Agreement in the
amount of $50.0 million with a weighted average interest rate of 3.1% and the
Company had borrowing availability of $70 million under the Credit Agreement.

In December 2000, the Company entered into a $62 million revolving accounts
receivable securitization facility (the "Securitization Facility"). On a
revolving basis, the Company sells its interests in its accounts receivable to
CVTI Receivables Corp. ("CRC"), a wholly-owned bankruptcy-remote special purpose
subsidiary incorporated in Nevada. CRC sells a percentage ownership in such
receivables to an unrelated financial entity. The Company can receive up to $62
million of proceeds, subject to eligible receivables and will pay a service fee
recorded as interest expense, based on commercial paper interest rates plus an
applicable margin of 0.41% per annum and a commitment fee of 0.10% per annum on
the daily unused portion of the Facility. The Securitization Facility is
collateralized by the receivables of CRC. The net proceeds under the
Securitization Facility are required to be shown as a current liability because
the term, subject to annual renewals, is 364 days. The transaction did not meet
the criteria for sale treatment under Financial Accounting Standard No. 140 and
is reflected as a secured borrowing in the financial statements. As of March 31,
2002, there were $48.1 million in borrowings outstanding.

The Credit Agreement and Securitization Facility contain certain restrictions
and covenants relating to, among other things, dividends, tangible net worth,
cash flow, acquisitions and dispositions, and total indebtedness. All of these
agreements are cross-defaulted. The Company is in compliance with these
agreements after receiving a waiver under the Securitization Facility relating
to the Chapter 11 filing by Kmart Corporation.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
decisions based upon estimates, assumptions, and factors it considers as
relevant to the circumstances. Such decisions include the selection of
applicable accounting principles and the use of judgment in their application,
the results of which impact reported amounts and disclosures. Changes in future
economic conditions or other business circumstances may affect the outcomes of
management's estimates and assumptions. Accordingly, actual results could differ
from those anticipated. A summary of the significant accounting policies
followed in preparation of the financial statements is contained in Note 1 of
the financial statements contained in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K.
Other footnotes describe various elements of the financial statements and the
assumptions on which specific amounts were determined.

The Company's critical accounting policies include the following:

Revenue Recognition - Freight revenue, drivers' wages and other direct operating
expenses are recognized on the date shipments are delivered to the customer.

Property and Equipment - Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Revenue equipment has been
depreciated over five to eight years with salvage values ranging from 18% to
48%. Gains or losses on disposal of revenue equipment are included in the
caption entitled depreciation, amortization and impairment charge in the
statements of operations. Impairment can be impacted by management's estimate of
the property and equipment's useful lives.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets - The Company ensures that long-lived assets to
be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying value or the fair value
less costs to sell. The Company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived
assets held for use for impairment losses by analyzing the operating performance
and future cash flows for those assets, whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be
recoverable. The Company adjusts the carrying value of the underlying assets if
the sum of expected undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying value.
Impairment can be impacted by management's projection of future cash flows, the
level of cash flows and salvage values, the methods of estimation used for
determining fair values and the impact of guaranteed residuals.

Insurance and Other Claims - The Company's insurance program for liability,
workers compensation, group medical, property damage, cargo loss and damage, and
other sources involves self insurance with high risk retention levels. In 2001,
the Company adopted an insurance program with significantly higher deductibles.
The deductible amount was increased from an aggregate $12,500 to $250,000 in
2001. The Company increased the deductible to $500,000 in the first quarter of
2002. Losses in excess of these risk retention levels are covered by insurance
in amounts which management considers adequate. The Company accrues the
estimated cost of the uninsured portion of pending claims. These accruals are
based on management's evaluation of the nature and severity of the claim and

Page 15
estimates of future claims development based on historical trends. Insurance and
claims expense will vary based on the frequency and severity of claims, the
premium expense and the lack of self insured retention.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities - The Company engages in
activities that expose it to market risks, including the effects of changes in
interest rates and fuel prices. Financial exposures are managed as an integral
part of the Company's risk management program, which seeks to reduce potentially
adverse effects that the volatility of the interest rate and fuel markets may
have on operating results. Hedging activities could defer the recognition of
losses to future periods. All derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at
their fair values. The Company also formally assesses, both at the hedge's
inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in
hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values
or cash flows of hedged items. When it is determined that a derivative is not
highly effective as a hedge or that it has ceased to be a highly effective
hedge, the Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively.

When hedge accounting is discontinued because it is determined that the
derivative no longer qualifies as an effective fair-value hedge, the Company
continues to carry the derivative on the balance sheet at its fair value, and no
longer adjusts the hedged asset or liability for changes in fair value. The
adjustment of the carrying amount of the hedged asset or liability is accounted
for in the same manner as other components of the carrying amount of that asset
or liability. When hedge accounting is discontinued because the hedged item no
longer meets the definition of a firm commitment, the Company continues to carry
the derivative on the balance sheet at its fair value, removes any asset or
liability that was recorded pursuant to recognition of the firm commitment from
the balance sheet and recognizes any gain or loss in earnings. When hedge
accounting is discontinued because it is probable that a forecasted transaction
will not occur, the Company continues to carry the derivative on the balance
sheet at its fair value, and gains and losses that were accumulated in other
comprehensive income are recognized immediately in earnings. In all other
situations in which hedge accounting is discontinued, the Company continues to
carry the derivative at its fair value on the balance sheet, and recognizes any
changes in its fair value in earnings.

The Company does not regularly engage in speculative transactions, nor does it
regularly hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes.

Lease Accounting - The Company leases a significant portion of its tractor and
trailer fleet using operating leases. Substantially all of the leases have
residual value guarantees under which the Company must insure that the lessor
receives a negotiated amount for the equipment at the expiration of the lease.
In accordance with SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases, the rental expense under
these leases is reflected as an operating expense under "revenue equipment
rentals and purchased transportation." Operating leases are carried off balance
sheet in accordance with SFAS No. 13.

The Company had commitments outstanding related to equipment, debt obligations
and fuel purchases as of January 1, 2002. Contractual commitments changed during
the quarter as a result of the payoff of senior notes with proceeds from the
Credit Agreement, and the purchase of 325 tractors off lease in February, 2002.
Contractual Cash Obligations as of January 1, 2002 are as follows:

<TABLE>
Payments Due By Period There-
(in thousands) Total 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 after
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Long Term Debt $49,150 $20,150 $26,000 $3,000 -- -- --

Short Term Debt 48,130 48,130 -- -- -- -- --

Operating Leases 68,517 20,137 15,393 7,944 7,151 6,789 11,103

Residual guarantees 55,153 15,720 19,562 -- 423 2,348 17,100

Purchase Obligations:

Fuel 68,147 31,427 36,720 -- -- -- --

Equipment 153,698 72,298 81,400 -- -- -- --
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total Contractual Cash $442,795 $207,862 $179,075 $10,944 $7,574 $9,137 $28,203
Obligations
=============================================================================================
</TABLE>
Page 16
INFLATION AND FUEL COSTS

Most of the Company's operating expenses are inflation-sensitive, with inflation
generally producing increased costs of operations. During the past three years,
the most significant effects of inflation have been on revenue equipment prices
and the compensation paid to the drivers. Innovations in equipment technology
and comfort have resulted in higher tractor prices, and there has been an
industry-wide increase in wages paid to attract and retain qualified drivers.
The Company historically has limited the effects of inflation through increases
in freight rates and certain cost control efforts.

In addition to inflation, fluctuations in fuel prices can affect profitability.
Fuel expense comprises a larger percentage of revenue for Covenant than many
other carriers because of Covenant's long average length of haul. Most of the
Company's contracts with customers contain fuel surcharge provisions. Although
the Company historically has been able to pass through most long-term increases
in fuel prices and taxes to customers in the form of surcharges and higher
rates, increases in fuel expense usually are not fully recovered. In the fourth
quarter of 1999, fuel prices escalated rapidly and have remained high throughout
most of 2000, 2001, and into 2002. This has increased the Company's cost of
operating.

SEASONALITY

In the trucking industry, revenue generally decreases as customers reduce
shipments during the winter holiday season and as inclement weather impedes
operations. At the same time, operating expenses generally increase, with fuel
efficiency declining because of engine idling and weather creating more
equipment repairs. For the reasons stated, first quarter net income historically
has been lower than net income in each of the other three quarters of the year.
The Company's equipment utilization typically improves substantially between May
and October of each year because of the trucking industry's seasonal shortage of
equipment on traffic originating in California and the Company's ability to
satisfy some of that requirement. The seasonal shortage typically occurs between
May and August because California produce carriers' equipment is fully utilized
for produce during those months and does not compete for shipments hauled by the
Company's dry van operation. During September and October, business increases as
a result of increased retail merchandise shipped in anticipation of the
holidays.

IMPAIRMENT OF TRACTOR VALUES AND FUTURE EXPENSE

For the past several quarters, the nationwide inventory of used tractors has far
exceeded demand. As a result, the market value of used tractors has fallen
significantly below both historical levels and the carrying values on the
Company's financial statements. The Company had extended the trade cycle of its
tractors from three years to four years during 2001, which delayed any
significant disposals into 2002 and later years. The market for used tractors
did not improve during the remaining portion of 2001.

The Company negotiated a tractor purchase and trade package with Freightliner
Corporation for calendar years 2002 and 2003 covering the sale of model year
1998 through 2000 tractors and the purchase of an equal number of replacement
units. The significant difference between the carrying values and the sale
prices of the used tractors combined with the Company's less profitable results
during 2001 caused the Company to test for asset impairment under applicable
accounting rules. In the test, the Company measured the expected undiscounted
future cash flows to be generated by the tractors over the remaining useful
lives and the disposal value at the end of the useful life against the carrying
values. The test indicated impairment, and during the fourth quarter of 2001,
and the first quarter of 2002, the Company recognized pre-tax charges of
approximately $15.4 million and $3.3 million, respectively, to reflect an
impairment in tractor values. The charges related to the Company's approximately
2,100 model year 1998 through 2000 in-use tractors.

The approximately 1,400 model year 2001 tractors are not affected by the
impairment charges. The Company has evaluated the 2001 model year tractors for
impairment and determined that such units were not impaired. These units are not
expected to be disposed of for 24 to 36 months following December 31, 2001. The
Company has adjusted the depreciation rate of the model year 2001 tractors to
approximate its recent experience with disposition values. Although management
believes the additional depreciation will bring the carrying values of the model
year 2001 tractors in line with future disposition values, the Company does not
have trade-in agreements covering those tractors. These assumptions represent
management's best estimate and actual values could differ by the time those
tractors are scheduled for trade. Management of the Company estimates the impact
of the change in the estimated useful lives and depreciation on the 2001 model
year tractors to be approximately $2.2 million pre-tax or $.10 per share
annually.

Because of the adverse change from historical purchase prices and residual
values, the annual expense per tractor on model year 2003 and 2004 tractors is
expected to be higher than the annual expense on the model year 1999 and 2000
units being replaced. Management expects the increase in depreciation expense to
be approximately one-half cent per mile pre-tax during the first year and grow
to approximately one cent per mile pre-tax as all of these new units are
delivered. By the time the model year 2001 tractors are traded and entire fleet
is converted, management expects the total increase in expense to be
approximately one and one-half cent pre-tax per mile. If the tractors are leased
instead of purchased, the references to increased depreciation would be
reflected as additional lease expense.

Page 17
ITEM 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS

The Company is exposed to market risks from changes in (i) certain commodity
prices and (ii) certain interest rates on its debt.


COMMODITY PRICE RISK

Prices and availability of all petroleum products are subject to political,
economic, and market factors that are generally outside the Company's control.
Because the Company's operations are dependent upon diesel fuel, significant
increases in diesel fuel costs could materially and adversely affect the
Company's results of operations and financial condition. Historically, the
Company has been able to recover a portion of short-term fuel price increases
from customers in the form of fuel surcharges. The price and availability of
diesel fuel can be unpredictable as well as the extent to which fuel surcharges
could be collected to offset such increases. For the first quarter of 2002,
diesel fuel expenses represented 15.8% of the Company's total operating expenses
and 16.1% of total freight revenue, net of fuel surcharge revenue. The Company
uses purchase commitments through suppliers to reduce a portion of its exposure
to fuel price fluctuations. At March 31, 2002, the national average price of
diesel fuel as provided by the U.S. Department of Energy was $1.281 per gallon.
At March 31, 2002, the notional amount for purchase commitments during 2002 was
27.5 million gallons. At March 31, 2002, the price of the notional 27.5 million
gallons would have produced approximately $2.5 million of income to offset fuel
expense if the price of fuel remained the same as of March 31, 2002. At March
31, 2002, a ten percent increase in the price of fuel would produce an
additional $3.4 million of income to offset fuel expense. At March 31, 2002, a
ten percent decrease in the price of fuel would produce $1.2 million of
additional fuel expense. In addition, during the third quarter of 2001, the
Company entered into two heating oil commodity swap contracts to hedge its
exposure to diesel fuel price fluctuations. These contracts are considered
highly effective and each calls for 4.5 million gallons of fuel purchases at a
fixed price of $0.695 and $0.629 per gallon, respectively, through the remainder
of 2002. At March 31, 2002 the cumulative fair value of these heating oil
contracts was an asset of $0.2 million, which was recorded in accrued expenses
with the offset to other comprehensive loss, net of taxes. The Company does not
enter into contracts with the objective of earning financial gains on price
fluctuations, nor does it trade in these instruments when there are no
underlying related exposures.

INTEREST RATE RISK

The Credit Agreement, provided there has been no default, carries a maximum
variable interest rate of LIBOR for the corresponding period plus 1.25%. During
the first quarter of 2001, the Company entered into two $10 million notional
amount interest rate swap agreements to manage the risk of variability in cash
flows associated with floating-rate debt. At March 31, 2002, the Company had
drawn $50 million under the Credit Agreement. Approximately $30 million was
subject to variable rates and the remaining $20 million was subject to interest
rate swaps that fixed the interest rates at 5.16% and 4.75% plus the applicable
margin per annum. The swaps expire January 2006 and March 2006. These
derivatives are not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 and
consequently are marked to fair value through earnings. At March 31, 2002, the
fair value of these interest rate swap agreements was a liability of $0.5
million. Assuming the March 31, 2002 variable rate borrowings, each
one-percentage point increase or decrease in LIBOR would affect the Company's
pre-tax interest expense by $300,000 on an annualized basis.

The Company does not trade in derivatives with the objective of earning
financial gains on price fluctuations, on a speculative basis, nor does it trade
in these instruments when there are no underlying related exposures.






Page 18
PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
None

Items 2, 3, 4 and 5. Not applicable

Item 6. Exhibits and reports on Form 8-K.
(a) Exhibits
<TABLE>
Exhibit
Number Reference Description
<S> <C> <C>
3.1 (1) Restated Articles of Incorporation.
3.2 (1) Amended By-Laws dated September 27, 1994.
4.1 (1) Restated Articles of Incorporation.
4.2 (1) Amended By-Laws dated September 27, 1994.
10.1 (1) 401(k) Plan filed as Exhibit 10.10.
10.2 (2) Outside Director Stock Option Plan, filed as Exhibit A.
10.3 (3) Amendment No. 1 to the Outside Director Stock Option Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.11.
10.4 (4) Amended and Restated Note Purchase Agreement dated December 13, 2000,
among Covenant Asset Management, Inc., Covenant Transport, Inc., and CIG &
Co., filed as Exhibit 10.8.
10.5 (4) Credit Agreement by and among Covenant Asset Management, Inc., Covenant
Transport, Inc., Bank of America, N.A., and Lenders, dated December 13, 2000,
filed as Exhibit 10.9.
10.6 (4) Loan Agreement dated December 12, 2000, among CVTI Receivables Corp.,
and Covenant Transport, Inc., Three Pillars Funding Corporation, and SunTrust
Equitable Securities Corporation, filed as Exhibit 10.10.
10.7 (4) Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of December 12, 2000, among CVTI
Receivables Corp., Covenant Transport, Inc., and Southern Refrigerated
Transport, Inc., filed as Exhibit 10.11.
10.8 (5) Clarification of Intent and Amendment No. 1 to Loan Agreement dated
March 7, 2001, filed as Exhibit 10.12.
10.9 (6) Incentive Stock Plan, Amended and Restated as of May 17, 2001, filed as Appendix B.
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
References:

Previously filed as an exhibit to and incorporated by reference from:

1) Form S-1, Registration No. 33-82978, effective October 28, 1994.
2) Schedule 14A, filed April 13, 2000.
3) Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2000.
4) Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.
5) Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001.
6) Schedule 14A, filed April 5, 2001.

(b) There were no reports on Form 8-K filed during the first quarter ended March
31, 2002.


Page 19
SIGNATURE



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


COVENANT TRANSPORT, INC.


Date: May 14, 2002 /s/ Joey B. Hogan
-----------------
Joey B. Hogan
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer












Page 20