Crown Crafts - 10-Q quarterly report FY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer inRule 12b-2of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2of the Exchange Act).  Yes o     No þ

 

The number of shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, of the registrant outstanding as of February 7, 2008 was 9,736,248.

 

 

 

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

1. Basis of Presentation:  The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to interim financial information and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, such interim consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position of Crown Crafts, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) as of December 30, 2007 and the results of its operations and cash flows for the periods presented. Such adjustments include normal, recurring accruals. Operating results for the three and nine-month periods ended December 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending March 30, 2008. For further information, refer to the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the annual report onForm 10-Kfor the year ended April 1, 2007.

 

Revenue Recognition:  Sales are recorded when goods are shipped to customers and are reported net of allowances for estimated returns and allowances in the consolidated statements of income. Allowances for returns are estimated based on historical rates. Allowances for returns, advertising allowances, warehouse allowances and volume rebates are netted against sales. These allowances are recorded commensurate with sales activity, and the cost of such allowances is netted against sales in reporting the results of operations. Shipping and handling costs, net of amounts reimbursed by customers, are relatively insignificant and are included in net sales.

 

Use of Estimates:  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates are made with respect to the allowances related to accounts receivable for customer deductions for returns, allowances and disputes. The Company has a certain amount of discontinued and irregular raw materials and finished goods which necessitate the establishment of inventory reserves which are highly subjective. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Segment and Related Information:  The Company operates primarily in one principal segment, infant and toddler products. These products consist of infant and toddler bedding, infant bibs and related soft goods.

 

Impairment of Long-lived Assets, Identifiable Intangibles and Goodwill:  The Company reviews for impairment long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of any asset may not be recoverable. In the event of impairment, the asset is written down to its fair market value. Assets to be disposed of, if any, are recorded at the lower of net book value or fair market value, less cost to sell at the date management commits to a plan of disposal, and are classified as assets held for sale on the consolidated balance sheet.

 

The Company reviews the carrying value of goodwill annually and sooner if facts and circumstances suggest that the asset may be impaired. Impairment of goodwill and write-downs, if any, are measured based on estimates of future cash flows. Goodwill is stated net of accumulated amortization of $6.4 million at December 30, 2007 and April 1, 2007. On April 1, 2002, the Company implemented Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. As a result, the Company discontinued amortizing goodwill but continued to amortize other long-lived intangible assets. In lieu of amortization, the Company is required to perform an annual impairment review of its goodwill. The Company has performed a transitional fair value based impairment test on its goodwill in accordance with SFAS No. 142. With the exception of goodwill related to Churchill Weavers, Inc. (“Churchill”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, the Company has determined that the fair value exceeded the recorded value at April 3, 2006 and April 2, 2007. Churchill’s goodwill of $90,000 was written off in June 2006 due to an impairment indicator, specifically the decline in sales volume and profitability in

 

 

recent years. Churchill has since ceased operations, and its remaining assets are held for sale (see Note 6 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements).

 

Provision for Income Taxes:  The provision for income taxes includes all currently payable federal, state and local taxes that are based upon the Company’s taxable income and the change during the fiscal year in net deferred income tax assets and liabilities. The Company provides for deferred income taxes based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.

 

Allowances Against Accounts Receivable:  The Company’s allowances against accounts receivable are primarily contractually agreed-upon deductions for items such as advertising and warehouse allowances and volume rebates. These deductions are recorded throughout the year commensurate with sales activity. Funding of the majority of the Company’s allowances occurs on a per-invoice basis.

 

The allowances for customer deductions, which are netted against accounts receivable in the consolidated balance sheets, consist ofagreed-uponadvertising support, markdowns and warehouse and other allowances. Consistent with the guidance provided in Emerging Issues Task Force01-9, all such allowances are recorded as direct offsets to sales, and such costs are accrued commensurate with sales activities. When a customer requests deductions, the allowances are reduced to reflect such payments.

 

The Company analyzes the components of the allowances for customer deductions monthly and adjusts the allowances to the appropriate levels. The timing of the customer initiated funding requests for advertising support can cause the net balance in the allowance account to fluctuate from period to period. The timing of such funding requests should have no impact on the consolidated statements of income since such costs are accrued commensurate with sales activity.

 

Royalty Payments:  The Company has entered into agreements that provide for royalty payments based on a percentage of sales with certain minimum guaranteed amounts. These royalty amounts are accrued based upon historical sales rates, adjusted for current sales trends by customers. Total royalty expenses included in cost of sales amounted to $3.2 million in each of the nine-month periods ended December 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Standards:  In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, which clarifies the accounting and disclosure for uncertain tax positions, as defined. FIN 48 seeks to reduce the diversity in practice associated with certain aspects of the recognition and measurement related to accounting for income taxes. On April 2, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48. Based on our recent evaluation, we have concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Our evaluation was performed for the years ended April 3, 2005, April 2, 2006 and April 1, 2007, the years which remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions as of December 30, 2007. The Company’s policy is to accrue interest expense and penalties as appropriate on its estimated unrecognized tax benefits as a charge to interest expense in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for a reporting entity to measure fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosure requirements related to fair value measurements. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is encouraged; provided, however, that the reporting entity has not yet issued financial statements for that fiscal year, including financial statements for an interim period within that fiscal year. The Company is assessing SFAS No. 157 and has not determined yet the impact that its adoption will have on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.

 

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. This statement provides companies an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair

 

 

value. SFAS No. 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is assessing SFAS No. 159 and has not determined yet the impact that its adoption will have on its results of operations or financial position.

 

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007), Business Combinations(“SFAS No. 141R”), which establishes principles and requirements for the reporting entity in a business combination, including recognition and measurement in the financial statements of the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree. This statement also establishes disclosure requirements to enable financial statement users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141R applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited.

 

2. Share-Based Compensation:  The Company has two incentive stock plans, the 1995 Stock Option Plan (“1995 Plan”) and the 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan (“2006 Plan”). The Company granted non-qualified stock options to employees and non-employee directors from the 1995 Plan through the fiscal year ended April 2, 2006. In conjunction with the approval of the 2006 Plan by the Company’s stockholders at its Annual Meeting in August 2006, options may no longer be issued from the 1995 Plan.

 

The 2006 Plan is intended to attract and retain directors, officers and employees of the Company and to motivate these persons to achieve performance objectives related to the Company’s overall goal of increasing stockholder value. The principal reason for adopting the 2006 Plan is to ensure that the Company has a mechanism for long-term, equity-based incentive compensation to directors, officers and employees. Awards granted under the 2006 Plan may be in the form of qualified or non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, long-term incentive compensation units consisting of a combination of cash and shares of the Company’s common stock, or any combination thereof within the limitations set forth in the 2006 Plan. The 2006 Plan is administered by the compensation committee of the board of directors, which selects eligible employees and non-employee directors to participate in the 2006 Plan and determines the type, amount and duration of individual awards.

 

On April 3, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. This statement requires the expensing of stock options and other share-based compensation and supersedes SFAS No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related implementation guidance that had previously allowed companies to choose between expensing stock options or providing pro forma disclosure only. SFAS No. 123(R) eliminates the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic value method under APB Opinion No. 25 and instead requires that such transactions be accounted for using a fair-value-based method. In addition, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 107 in April 2005, which provides supplemental implementation guidance for SFAS No. 123(R).

 

The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair-value of stock options under SFAS No. 123(R), consistent with the method previously used for pro forma disclosures under SFAS No. 123. The Company elected to use the modified prospective transition method permitted by SFAS No. 123(R). Under the modified prospective transition method, SFAS No. 123(R) applies to stock options granted on or after April 3, 2006 as well as the unvested portion of stock options that were outstanding as of April 2, 2006, including those that are subsequently modified, repurchased or cancelled. Under the modified prospective transition method, compensation expense recognized during the fiscal year ended April 1, 2007 included compensation for all stock options granted prior to, but not yet vested as of, April 2, 2006 in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123. Prior periods were not restated to reflect the impact of adopting SFAS No. 123(R).

 

The Company recorded $155,000 and $432,000 of share-based compensation during the three and nine-month periods ended December 30, 2007, which affected basic and diluted earnings per share by $0.02 and $0.04,

 

 

respectively. No share-based compensation costs were capitalized as part of the cost of an asset as of December 30, 2007.

 

Stock Options:  The following table represents stock option activity for fiscal year 2008:

 

 

During the quarter ended September 30, 2007, the Company granted 112,000 non-qualified stock options at the market price at the date of grant, which options vest over a two-year period, assuming continued service. The following weighted-average assumptions were used for the stock options granted during the quarter ended September 30, 2007. No options were granted during the quarter ended December 30, 2007.

 

 

For the three and nine-month periods ended December 30, 2007, the Company recognized compensation expense associated with stock options as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Non-vested Stock:  The fair value of non-vested stock granted is determined based on the number of shares granted multiplied by the quoted closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. All non-vested stock granted under the 2006 Plan vests based upon continued service.

 

During the quarter ended October 1, 2006, the Company granted 375,000 shares of non-vested stock with a fair value of $3.15 as of the date of the stock grants. These shares have four-year cliff vesting. The Company recognized $73,000 and $221,000 of compensation expense related to these non-vested stock grants in the three and nine-month

 

 

periods ended December 30, 2007, respectively, which was included in marketing and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. The deferred amount of these non-vested stock grants is being amortized by monthly charges to earnings over the remaining portion of the vesting period.

 

At December 30, 2007, the amount of unrecognized compensation expense related to these stock grants amounted to $788,000. The amount of compensation expense related to non-vested stock grants to be recognized in future periods will be affected by any future non-vested stock grants and by the separation from the Company of any employee who has received non-vested stock grants that are unvested as of such employee’s separation date.

 

3. Inventory:  Major classes of inventory were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Inventory is recorded net of reserves for inventories classified as irregular or discontinued of $270,000 at December 30, 2007 and $344,000 at April 1, 2007.

 

Factoring Agreement:  The Company assigns the majority of its trade accounts receivable to a commercial factor. Under the terms of the factoring agreement, the factor remits payments to the Company on the average due date of each group of invoices assigned. The factor bears credit losses with respect to assigned accounts receivable from approved customers that are within approved credit limits. The Company bears losses resulting from returns, allowances, claims and discounts.

 

Long-term debt:  At December 30, 2007 and April 1, 2007, long-term debt consisted of:

 

 

The Company’s long-term debt at December 30, 2007 includes the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minimum annual maturities of long-term debt are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Kimberly Grant:  On December 29, 2006, Crown Crafts Infant Products, Inc. (“CCIP”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, acquired substantially all of the assets of Kimberly Grant, Inc., a designer of various infant and toddler products. The purchase price consisted of $550,000 paid at closing and $50,000 paid upon renewal of the acquired “Kimberly Grant” trademark.

 

The assets acquired were limited to certain intangible assets, the fair values of which were determined by the Company with the assistance of an independent third party. The Company’s resulting allocation of the purchase price, the estimated useful life of the assets acquired, the accumulated amortization and the amortization expense as of and for the nine-month period ended December 30, 2007 is as follows:

 

 

Springs:  On November 5, 2007, CCIP acquired certain assets from, and assumed certain liabilities of, Springs Global US, Inc. (“Springs”) with respect to the baby products line of Springs. The purchase price consisted initially of $12.4 million for the inventory and certain intangible assets, which was subject to an adjustment pending the completion of a final valuation of the inventory purchased. Upon the completion of this valuation, $1.4 million was returned to the Company for a net purchase price of $11.0 million. The Company also capitalized $0.4 million of direct costs associated with this acquisition for a total capitalized acquisition cost of $11.4 million.

 

 

The preliminary fair values of the intangible assets acquired were determined by the Company with the assistance of an independent third party. The valuation is expected to be completed by the time of the filing of the Company’s annual report on form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2008. The Company’s preliminary allocation of the intangible assets acquired, their estimated useful life, the accumulated amortization and the amortization expense as of and for the nine-month period ended December 30, 2007 is as follows:

 

 

 

6. Discontinued Operations:  On February 2, 2007, the Company announced that it would liquidate Churchill. Goodwill of $90,000 associated with the acquisition of Churchill was written-off in June 2006. In anticipation of the liquidation of Churchill, the Company recorded valuation allowances of $550,000 in the quarter ended December 31, 2006 to reflect the expected net realizable value of Churchill’s receivables, inventories and prepaid expenses. In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007, the Company sold the Churchill Weavers name, together with Churchill’s other intellectual property, domain name and website, yarn inventory, looms and other weaving, sewing and laundry equipment for $275,000. The Company also sold in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007 a small portion of the Churchill property in Berea, Kentucky, and Churchill’s archives and certain antiquities for $110,000. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, Churchill’s operations ceased and all employees were terminated.

 

The Company is actively marketing Churchill’s land and building for sale. The property has been appraised at greater than net book value. In accordance with accounting guidelines, in the third quarter of fiscal year 2008, the property is classified as assets held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet, and the operations of Churchill are classified as discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of income. These classifications were not used prior to the end of fiscal year 2007 because Churchill’s operations were continuing at that time.

 

7. Treasury Stock:  In June 2007, the board of directors of the Company created a capital committee and authorized the committee to adopt a program that would allow the Company to spend an aggregate of up to $6 million to repurchase shares of the Company’s common stock from July 1, 2007 through July 1, 2008. Pursuant to this program, the Company repurchased 140,353 shares and 225,208 shares during the three and nine-month periods ended December 30, 2007, at a cost of $519,000 and $854,000, respectively.

 

The Company operates indirectly through its subsidiaries, Crown Crafts Infant Products, Inc. and Hamco, Inc., primarily in the Infant, Toddler and Juvenile Product segments within the Consumer Products industry. The Company’s offices are located in Compton, California; Gonzales, Louisiana; and Rogers, Arkansas.

 

The Infant, Toddler and Juvenile Product segments consist of bedding, bibs, soft goods and accessories. The Company’s products are marketed under a variety of Company-owned trademarks, under trademarks licensed from others, without trademarks as unbranded merchandise and with customers’ private labels. The products are produced primarily by foreign contract manufacturers, then warehoused and shipped from facilities in Compton and Ontario, California. Sales are generally made directly to retailers, primarily mass merchants, large chain stores and specialty stores.

 

The infant, toddler and juvenile consumer products industry is highly competitive. The Company competes with a variety of distributors and manufacturers (both branded and private label), including Kids Line, LLC, a division of Russ Berrie and Co., Inc.; Dolly Inc.; Co Ca Lo, Inc.; Carters, Inc.; Danara International, Ltd.; Luv n’ Care, Ltd.; The First Years Inc.; Triboro Quilt Manufacturing, Inc.; Gerber Childrenswear, Inc.; and Baby Boom Consumer Products, Inc., a division of The Betesh Group, on the basis of quality, design, price, brand name recognition, service and packaging. The Company’s ability to compete depends principally on styling, price, service to the retailer and continued high regard for the Company’s products and trade names.

 

The following table contains results of operations data for the three and nine-month periods ended December 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 and the dollar and percentage variances among those periods.

 

 

Net Sales:  Sales of bedding, blankets and accessories increased for the three-month period of fiscal year 2008 as compared to the same period in fiscal year 2007. Sales increased by $2.9 million due to the acquisition of the baby products line of Springs on November 5, 2007, and increased by $2.5 million due to shipments of new bedding and blanket programs. These increases were offset by $1.3 million in lower replenishment orders or discontinued programs.

 

Sales of bedding, blankets and accessories increased for the nine-month period of fiscal year 2008 as compared to the same period in fiscal year 2007. Sales increased by $2.9 million due to the acquisition of the baby product line of Springs on November 5, 2007, and increased by $8.3 million due to shipments of new bedding and blanket programs. These increases were offset by decreased sales of $7.5 million due to programs that were discontinued in the latter part of fiscal year 2007 and the first nine months of fiscal year 2008. In addition, there was a decrease in shipments of replenishment orders of $1.5 million and a decrease of $0.3 million due to initial shipments that occurred during the prior year that were not repeated in the current year.

 

Bib and bath sales decreased for the three-month period of fiscal year 2008 as compared to the same period in fiscal year 2007. Sales decreased by $1.4 million due to programs that were discontinued or had lower replenishment orders and by $0.4 million related to the discontinuance of sales of vinyl bibs. Offsetting these decreases was an increase of $0.7 million related to sales of new designs and promotions.

 

Bib and bath sales decreased for the nine-month period of fiscal year 2008 as compared to the same period in fiscal year 2007. Sales decreased by $4.1 million due to programs that were discontinued or had lower replenishment orders and by $0.2 million due to promotions in the prior year that were not repeated in the current year. Also, there was a net decrease of $0.9 million in shipments of replenishment orders related to the discontinuance of sales of vinyl bibs. Offsetting these decreases were increases of $2.1 million related to sales of new designs and increased initial shipments.

 

Gross Profit:  Gross profit increased in amount, but decreased as a percentage of net sales by 0.3% for the three-month period of fiscal year 2008 as compared to the same period in fiscal year 2007. The increase in gross profit dollars is due to the increased sales volume and decreased standard cost of sales offset by increased negative burden deferral, amortization and warehousing costs. Standard cost of sales, net of an increase in royalties, as a percentage of net sales improved by 2.0%. This improvement in gross profit was offset by a change in the burden deferral. For the three-month period of the fiscal year 2007, the burden deferral was a negative $48,000 while in fiscal year 2008 the burden deferral was a negative $274,000. This swing negatively impacted the current year gross profit by 1.2% as a percentage of net sales. Additionally, gross profit was lowered in the three-month period of the current year by $230,000 of amortization expense related to the Kimberly Grant and Springs baby product line acquisitions. By comparison, no acquisition costs were amortized in the three-month period of fiscal year 2007. Warehousing costs increased as compared to fiscal year 2007 by $292,000 due to the warehousing and shared services arrangement entered into in conjunction with the Springs acquisition.

Gross profit decreased in both amount and as a percentage of net sales for the nine-month period of fiscal year 2008 as compared to the same period of fiscal year 2007. For the nine-month period ended December 30, 2007, the over-absorption of overhead related to the increase in inventory was $23,000 compared to $495,000 for the nine-month period ended December 30, 2006. Additionally, gross profit was negatively impacted in the current year by a $225,000 charge related to vinyl bibs recorded in the second quarter, acquisition-related amortization expense of $252,000, and increased warehousing costs as referenced above of $292,000.

 

Marketing and Administrative Expenses:  Marketing and administrative expenses for the three-month period of fiscal year 2008 increased in amount but decreased as a percentage of net sales as compared to the same period of fiscal year 2007. The increased amounts were in the areas of salaries, share-based compensation, amortization, and advertising as the Company adjusted to the acquisition of the Springs baby product line. For the nine-month period, marketing and administrative expenses increased in both amount and as a percentage of net sales from fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year 2008. The Company recorded $432,000 of share-based compensation for the nine-month period ended December 30, 2007, compared to $171,000 for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2006. Also, the Company incurred costs of $476,000 during fiscal year 2008 associated with the Company’s proxy contest. Additionally, the Company experienced increased salaries and amortization as the Company integrated the Springs acquisition.

 

Interest Expense:  The increase in interest expense for the three-month period of fiscal year 2008 as compared to the same period in fiscal year 2007 is due to a higher revolving line of credit balance and a new term loan executed in conjunction with the acquisition of the baby product line from Springs on November 5, 2007. For the nine-month period ended December 30, 2007, interest expense decreased by $729,000 as compared to the nine-month period ended December 31, 2006 due to lower average debt balances and lower interest rates primarily as a result of the refinancing of the Company’s debt on July 11, 2006.

 

Other Income — Net:  Other income in the three-month period of the fiscal year 2008 consisted primarily of favorable settlements of approximately $213,000 of workers’ compensation claims related to the Company’s high-deductible plan that was terminated in 2001. Other income in fiscal year 2007 consisted mainly of interest income received on the Company’s overnight investment sweep through July 11, 2006. The Company had $7.8 million cash on July 11, 2006, $7.4 million of which was used to reduce debt in connection with the refinancing of the Company’s debt on July 11, 2006.

 

Net cash provided by operating activities was $2.9 million for the nine-month period of fiscal year 2008. The increase in cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to net income, utilization of deferred taxes, and an increase in accounts payable, offset by increases in accounts receivable and inventory. Net cash provided by operating activities for the nine-month period of fiscal year 2007 was $10.6 million. The increase in cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to net income, utilization of deferred taxes, a decrease in accounts receivable and an increase in accounts payable, offset by the gain on debt refinancing and an increase in inventory. Net cash used in investing activities was $493,000 in the nine-month period of fiscal year 2008 compared to $700,000 in the same period of fiscal year 2007. Net cash used in investing activities consisted primarily of acquisition costs related to the Springs baby products line of $356,000 in fiscal year 2008 and $550,000 related to Kimberly Grant in fiscal year 2007. Net cash used in financing activities was $2.5 million in the nine-month period of fiscal year 2008 compared to $13.7 million in the same period of fiscal year 2007. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2007, the Company had a cash balance of $7.6 million and was not required to make payments on its credit facilities. In July 2006, the Company refinanced its credit facilities using cash of $7.4 million to reduce debt. Net cash was used in financing activities in fiscal year 2008 to pay down the revolving line of credit and the term loan entered into in connection with the Springs acquisition and to repurchase outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock.

 

The Company’s ability to make scheduled payments of principal, to pay the interest on or to refinance its maturing indebtedness, to fund capital expenditures or to comply with its debt covenants will depend upon future performance. The Company’s future performance is, to a certain extent, subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors beyond its control. Based upon the current level of operations, the Company believes that cash flow from operations together with availability from the revolving line of credit will be adequate to meet liquidity needs.

To reduce its exposure to credit losses and to enhance its cash flow, the Company assigns the majority of its trade accounts receivable to a commercial factor. The Company’s factor approves customer accounts and credit lines and collects the Company’s accounts receivable balances. Under the terms of the factoring agreement, which expires in July, 2009, the factor remits payments to the Company on the average due date of each group of invoices assigned. If a customer fails to pay the factor on the due date, the Company is charged interest at prime less 1.0%, which was 6.25% at December 30, 2007, until payment is received. The factor bears credit losses with respect to assigned accounts receivable from approved customers that are within approved credit limits. The Company bears losses resulting from returns, allowances, claims and discounts. The Company’s factor may at any time terminate or limit its approval of shipments to a particular customer. If such a termination occurs, the Company must either assume the credit risks for shipments after the date of such termination or cease shipments to such customer.

 

This Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are based upon management’s current expectations, projections, estimates and assumptions. Words such as “expects,” “believes,” “anticipates” and variations of such words and similar expressions identify such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause future results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements. These risks include, among others, general economic conditions, including changes in interest rates, in the overall level of consumer spending and in the price of oil, cotton and other raw materials used in the Company’s products, changing competition, changes in the retail environment, the level and pricing of future orders from the Company’s customers, the Company’s dependence upon third-party suppliers, including some located in foreign countries with unstable political situations, the Company’s ability to successfully implement new information technologies, customer acceptance of both new designs and newly-introduced product lines, actions of competitors that may impact the Company’s business, disruptions to transportation systems or shipping lanes used by the Company or its suppliers, and the Company’s dependence upon licenses from third parties. Reference is also made to the Company’s periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for additional factors that may impact the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. The Company does not undertake to update the forward-looking statements contained herein to conform to actual results or changes in the Company’s explanations, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

 

 

The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates on debt, changes in commodity prices, changes in international trade regulations, the concentration of the Company’s customers and the Company’s reliance upon licenses. The Company’s exposure to interest rate risk relates to the Company’s floating rate debt, of which a balance of $12.1 million was outstanding at December 30, 2007 and a balance of $3.5 million was outstanding at December 31, 2006. Each 1.0 percentage point increase in the prime interest rate would decrease pre-tax earnings by $121,000 based on the debt level as of December 30, 2007. The Company’s exposure to commodity price risk primarily relates to changes in the price of cotton and oil, which are the principal raw materials used in a substantial number of the Company’s products. Also, changes in import quantity allotments can materially impact the availability of the Company’s products and the prices at which those products can be purchased by the Company for resale. Additionally, the Company’s top three customers represent 80% of gross sales, and 39% of the Company’s gross sales is of licensed products. The Company could be materially impacted by the loss of one or more of these customers or licenses.

 

 

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined inRules 13a-15(e)and15d-15(e)under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), as of the end of the period covered by this report, as required by paragraph (b) ofRules 13a-15or 15d-15 of the Exchange Act. Based on such evaluation, such officers have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

 

During the quarter ended December 30, 2007, there was not any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) ofRules 13a-15or 15d-15 of the Exchange Act that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s control over financial reporting.

 

From time to time, the Company is involved in various legal proceedings relating to claims arising in the ordinary course of its business. Except as set forth in the Company’s annual report onForm 10-Kfor the year ended April 1, 2007, neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries is a party to any such legal proceeding the outcome of which, individually or in the aggregate, is expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

 

There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in Item 1A. of Part 1 in ourForm 10-Kfor the year ended April 1, 2007.

 

 

The table below sets forth information regarding the Company’s repurchases of its outstanding common stock during the three-month period ended December 30, 2007.

 

 

 

 

None.

 

None.

 

None.

 

 

 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

CROWN CRAFTS, INC.

 

AMY VIDRINE SAMSON

Chief Financial Officer

(duly authorized signatory and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Date: February 13, 2008