Donegal Group - 10-Q quarterly report FY

 

(Mark One)

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

1195 River Road, P.O. Box 302, Marietta, PA 17547-0302(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

(717) 426-1931(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not applicable(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

     Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ.  No o.

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  o          Accelerated filer  þ          Non-accelerated filer  o.

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  o.  No  þ.

     Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 19,538,357 shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, and 5,576,775 shares of Class B Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding on July 31, 2006.

All 2005 capital accounts and share information have been restated for 4-for-3 stock split as discussed in footnote 1.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Donegal Group Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)

All 2005 per share information has been restated for 4-for-3 stock split as discussed in footnote 1.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Donegal Group Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)

All 2005 per share information has been restated for 4-for-3 stock split as discussed in footnote 1.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Donegal Group Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006

All 2005 capital accounts and share information have been restated for 4-for-3 stock split as discussed in footnote 1.

Donegal Group Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

     We were organized as an insurance holding company by Donegal Mutual Insurance Company (“Donegal Mutual”) on August 26, 1986. We operate predominantly as an underwriter of personal and commercial lines of property and casualty insurance through our insurance subsidiaries. Our personal lines products consist primarily of homeowners and private passenger automobile policies. Our commercial lines products consist primarily of commercial automobile, commercial multi-peril and workers’ compensation policies. Our insurance subsidiaries, Atlantic States Insurance Company (“Atlantic States”), Southern Insurance Company of Virginia (“Southern”), Le Mars Insurance Company (“Le Mars”) and the Peninsula Insurance Group (“Peninsula”), which consists of Peninsula Indemnity Company and The Peninsula Insurance Company, write personal and commercial lines of property and casualty insurance exclusively through a network of independent insurance agents in certain Mid-Atlantic, Midwest and Southern states. Donegal Mutual and we conduct our business together with our insurance subsidiaries as the Donegal Insurance Group. We also own approximately 48% of the outstanding stock of Donegal Financial Services Corporation (“DFSC”), a thrift holding company that owns Province Bank FSB. Donegal Mutual owns the remaining approximately 52% of the outstanding stock of DFSC.

     At June 30, 2006, Donegal Mutual held approximately 41% of our outstanding Class A common stock and approximately 68% of our outstanding Class B common stock.

     Atlantic States, our largest subsidiary, and Donegal Mutual have a pooling agreement under which both companies proportionately share their combined underwriting results, excluding certain reinsurance assumed by Donegal Mutual from our insurance subsidiaries. See Note 4 — Reinsurance for more information regarding the pooling agreement.

     On April 6, 2006, our board of directors declared a four-for-three stock split of our Class A common stock and our Class B common stock in the form of a 33-1/3% stock dividend with a record date of April 17, 2006 and a distribution date of April 26, 2006. The capital stock accounts, all share amounts and earnings per share amounts for 2005 have been restated to reflect this stock split.

     Effective as of September 21, 2005, certain members of the Donegal Insurance Group entered into an Acquisition Rights Agreement with The Shelby Insurance Company and Shelby Casualty Insurance Company (together, “Shelby”), part of Vesta Insurance Group, Inc. The agreement grants those members the right, effective January 1, 2006, at their discretion and subject to their traditional underwriting and agency appointment standards, to offer renewal or replacement policies to the holders of Shelby’s personal lines policies in Pennsylvania, Tennessee and Alabama, in connection with Shelby’s plans of withdrawal from those three states. As part of the agreement, the Donegal Insurance Group is paying specified amounts to Shelby based on the direct premiums written by the Donegal Insurance Group on the renewal and replacement policies it issues. Net premiums written related to this agreement amounted to $2.9 million in the first half of 2006.

     The financial information for the interim periods included herein is unaudited; however, such information reflects all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods included herein. Our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of our results of operations to be expected for the twelve months ending December 31, 2006.

     These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

     The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share is as follows:

All outstanding options are exercisable exclusively for the purchase of shares of Class A common stock and were included in the computation of diluted earnings per share.

     Atlantic States has participated in an inter-company pooling agreement with Donegal Mutual since 1986. Both Atlantic States and Donegal Mutual place all of their direct business into the pool, and Atlantic States and Donegal Mutual then proportionately share the pooled business in accordance with the terms of the pooling agreement. Atlantic States has a 70% share of the results of the pool, and Donegal Mutual has a 30% share of the results of the pool. There have been no changes to the pool participation percentages since July 1, 2000.

     Our insurance operations are interrelated with the insurance operations of Donegal Mutual, and, while maintaining the separate corporate existence of each company, Donegal Mutual and we conduct our insurance business together with our other insurance subsidiaries as the Donegal Insurance Group. As such, Donegal Mutual and we share the same business philosophy, management, employees and facilities

and offer the same types of insurance products. We do not anticipate any changes in the pooling agreement with Donegal Mutual, including changes in Atlantic States’ pool participation level in the foreseeable future.

     The risk profiles of the business written by Atlantic States and Donegal Mutual historically have been, and continue to be, substantially similar. The products, classes of business underwritten, pricing practices and underwriting standards of both companies are determined and administered by the same management and underwriting personnel. Further, as the Donegal Insurance Group, the companies share a combined business plan to achieve market penetration and underwriting profitability objectives. The products marketed by Atlantic States and Donegal Mutual are generally complementary, thereby allowing Donegal Insurance Group to offer a broader range of products to a given market and to expand Donegal Insurance Group’s ability to service an entire personal lines or commercial lines account. Distinctions within the products of the respective companies generally relate to specific risk profiles targeted within similar classes of business, such as preferred tier versus standard tier products, but not all of the standard risk gradients are allocated to one company. Therefore, the underwriting profitability of the business directly written by the individual companies will vary. However, as the risk characteristics of all business written directly by both companies are homogenized within the pool and each company shares the results according to its participation level, we realize 70% of the underwriting profitability of the pool (because of our 70% participation in the pool), while Donegal Mutual realizes 30% of the underwriting profitability of the pool (because of Donegal Mutual’s 30% participation in the pool). Pooled business represents the predominant percentage of the net underwriting activity of both Atlantic States and Donegal Mutual.

     Atlantic States, Southern and Donegal Mutual purchase third-party reinsurance on a combined basis. Le Mars and Peninsula have separate third-party reinsurance programs that provide similar types of coverage and that are commensurate with their relative size and exposures. We use several different reinsurers, all of which, consistent with our requirements, have an A.M. Best rating of A- (Excellent) or better or, with respect to foreign reinsurers, have a financial condition that, in the opinion of our management, is equivalent to a company with at least an A- rating. The following information relates to the external reinsurance Atlantic States, Southern and Donegal Mutual has in place during 2006:

     We and Donegal Mutual also purchase facultative reinsurance to cover exposures from losses that exceed the limits provided by our respective treaty reinsurance.

     In addition to the pooling agreement and third-party reinsurance, Atlantic States, Southern and Le Mars have various arrangements with Donegal Mutual.

     There were no significant changes to the pooling agreement, third-party reinsurance or other reinsurance agreements with Donegal Mutual during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.

     We evaluate the performance of our personal lines and commercial lines segments based upon underwriting results as determined under statutory accounting principles prescribed or permitted by various state insurance departments (“SAP”), which is used by management to measure performance for our total business. Financial data by segment is as follows:

     On May 15, 2003, we received $15.0 million in net proceeds from the issuance of subordinated debentures. The debentures mature on May 15, 2033 and are callable at our option, at par, after five years. The debentures carry an interest rate equal to the three-month LIBOR rate plus 4.10%, which is adjustable quarterly. At June 30, 2006, the interest rate on the debentures was 9.00%.

     On October 29, 2003, we received $10.0 million in net proceeds from the issuance of subordinated debentures. The debentures mature on October 29, 2033 and are callable at our option, at par, after five years. The debentures carry an interest rate equal to the three-month LIBOR rate plus 3.85%, which is adjustable quarterly. At June 30, 2006, the interest rate on the debentures was 9.27%.

     On May 24, 2004, we received $5.0 million in net proceeds from the issuance of subordinated debentures. The debentures mature on May 24, 2034 and are callable at our option, at par, after five years. The debentures carry an interest rate equal to the three-month LIBOR rate plus 3.85%, which is adjustable quarterly. At June 30, 2006, the interest rate on the debentures was 9.06%.

     Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” a revision of SFAS No. 123 and superseding APB Opinion No. 25. SFAS No. 123(R) requires the measurement of all employee share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, using a fair-value-based method and the recording of such expense in our consolidated statements of income.

     SFAS No. 123(R) does not set accounting requirements for share-based compensation to nonemployees. We continue to account for share-based compensation to nonemployees under the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 44 (FIN No. 44), “Accounting for Certain Transactions involving Stock Compensation,” and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 00-23 (EITF 00-23), “Issues Related to the Accounting for Stock Compensation under APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and FIN No. 44, Accounting for Certain Transactions involving Stock Compensation.” Pursuant to FIN No. 44, APB Opinion No. 25 did not apply to the separate financial statements of a subsidiary in accounting for share-based compensation granted by the subsidiary to employees of the parent or another subsidiary. EITF 00-23 states that when employees of a controlling entity are granted share-based compensation, the entity granting the share-based compensation should measure the fair value of the award at the grant date and recognize the fair value as a dividend to the controlling entity. These provisions apply to us, because Donegal Mutual is the employer of record for the majority of employees that provide services to us. As a result, the impact of the implementation of SFAS No. 123(R) was immaterial to our results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2006.

     SFAS No. 123(R) also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under previous rules. Tax benefits realized upon the exercise of stock options of $1,728,072 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 were classified as financing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

     In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (FIN No. 48) FIN No. 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN No. 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We do not expect the impact of adopting FIN No. 48 to have a significant effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

     The following information should be read in conjunction with the historical financial information and the notes thereto included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of

Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 13, 2006.

     Our financial statements are combined with those of our insurance subsidiaries and are presented on a consolidated basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”).

     We make estimates and assumptions that can have a significant effect on amounts and disclosures we report in our financial statements. The most significant estimates relate to our reserves for property and casualty insurance unpaid losses and loss expenses, valuation of investments and policy acquisition costs. While we believe our estimates are appropriate, the ultimate amounts may differ from the estimates provided. These estimates are regularly reviewed, and any adjustment considered necessary is reflected in our current results of operations.

Liability for Losses and Loss Expenses

     Liabilities for losses and loss expenses are estimates at a given point in time of the amounts an insurer expects to pay with respect to policyholder claims based on facts and circumstances then known. An insurer recognizes at the time of establishing its estimates that its ultimate liability for losses and loss expenses will exceed or be less than such estimates. Our estimates of liabilities for losses and loss expenses are based on assumptions as to future loss trends and expected claims severity, judicial theories of liability and other factors. However, during the loss adjustment period, we may learn additional facts regarding individual claims, and consequently it often becomes necessary to refine and adjust our estimates of our liability. We reflect any adjustments to our liabilities for losses and loss expenses in our results of operations in the period in which the changes in estimates are made.

     We maintain liabilities for the payment of losses and loss expenses with respect to both reported and unreported claims. Liabilities for loss expenses are intended to cover the ultimate costs of settling all losses, including investigation and litigation costs from such losses. We base the amount of liability for reported losses primarily upon a case-by-case evaluation of the type of risk involved, knowledge of the circumstances surrounding each claim and the insurance policy provisions relating to the type of loss. We determine the amount of our liability for unreported claims and loss expenses on the basis of historical information by line of insurance. We account for inflation in the reserving function through analysis of costs and trends, and reviews of historical reserving results. We closely monitor our liabilities and recompute them periodically using new information on reported claims and a variety of statistical techniques. Our liabilities for losses are not discounted.

     Reserve estimates can change over time because of unexpected changes in assumptions related to our external environment and, to a lesser extent, assumptions as to our internal operations. Assumptions related to our external environment include the absence of significant changes in tort law and the legal environment that increase liability exposure, consistency in judicial interpretations of insurance coverage and policy provisions and stability in economic conditions and the rate of loss cost inflation. For example, we have experienced a decrease in claims frequency on bodily injury liability claims during the past several years while claims severity has gradually increased. These trend changes give rise to greater uncertainty as to the pattern of future loss settlements on bodily injury claims. Related uncertainties regarding future trends include the cost of medical technologies and procedures and changes in the utilization of medical procedures. Internal assumptions include accurate measurement of the impact of rate changes and changes in policy provisions and consistency in the quality and characteristics of business written within a given line of business, among other items. To the extent we determine that underlying factors impacting our assumptions have changed, we attempt to make appropriate adjustments for such changes in our reserves. Accordingly, our ultimate liability for unpaid losses and loss expenses will likely differ from the amount recorded at June 30, 2006. For every 1% change in our estimate for loss and loss expense reserves, net of reinsurance recoverable, the effect on our pre-tax results of operations would be approximately $1.7 million.

     The establishment of appropriate liabilities is an inherently uncertain process, and there can be no assurance that our ultimate liability will not exceed our estimates of loss and loss expense reserves and have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore, the timing, frequency and extent of adjustments to our estimated future liabilities cannot be predicted, since the historical conditions and events that serve as a basis for our estimates of ultimate claim costs may change. As is the case for substantially all property and casualty insurance companies, we have found it necessary

in the past to increase our estimated future liabilities for losses and loss expenses in certain periods, and in other periods our estimates have exceeded our actual liabilities. Further adjustments could be required in the future. However, on the basis of our internal procedures, which analyze, among other things, our prior assumptions, our experience with similar cases and historical trends such as reserving patterns, loss payments, pending levels of unpaid claims and product mix, as well as court decisions, economic conditions and public attitudes, we believe that we have made adequate provision for our liability for losses and loss expenses.

     Because of our participation in the pool with Donegal Mutual, we are exposed to adverse loss development on the business of Donegal Mutual included in the pool. However, pooled business represents the predominant percentage of the net underwriting activity of both companies, and Donegal Mutual and we would proportionately share any adverse risk development of the pooled business. The business in the pool is homogenous (i.e., we have a 70% share of the entire pool and Donegal Mutual has a 30% share of the entire pool). Since substantially all of the business of Atlantic States and Donegal Mutual is pooled and the results shared by each company according to its participation level under the terms of the pooling agreement, the underwriting pool is intended to produce a more uniform and stable underwriting result from year to year for each company than either would experience individually and to spread the risk of loss among each company.

     Our liability for losses and loss expenses by major line of business as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 consisted of the following:

     We have evaluated the effect on our loss and loss expense reserves and stockholders’ equity in the event of reasonably likely changes in the variables considered in establishing loss and loss expense reserves. The range of reasonably likely changes was established based on a review of changes in accident year development by line of business and applied to loss reserves as a whole. The selected range does not necessarily indicate what could be the potential best or worst case or likely scenario. The following table sets forth the effect on our loss and loss expense reserves and stockholders’ equity in the event of reasonably likely changes in the variables considered in establishing loss and loss expense reserves:

Investments

     Our investments in available-for-sale fixed maturity and equity securities are presented at estimated fair value, which generally represents quoted market prices. As of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, gross unrealized losses within our investment portfolio totaled $12.3 million and $6.1 million, respectively. Substantially all of these unrealized losses resulted from increases in market interest rates and the related impact on our fixed maturity investment valuations.

     We make estimates concerning the valuation of our investments and the recognition of other than temporary declines in the value of our investments. When we consider the decline in value of an individual investment to be other than temporary, we write down the investment to its estimated net realizable value, and the amount of the write-down is reflected as a realized loss in our results of operations. We individually monitor all investments for other than temporary declines in value. Generally, if an individual equity security has depreciated in value by more than 20% of original cost, and has been in an unrealized loss position for more than six months, we assume there has been an other than temporary decline in value. With respect to debt securities, we assume there has been an other than temporary decline in value if it is probable that contractual payments will not be received. In addition, we may write down securities in an unrealized loss position based on a number of other factors, including the fair value of the investment being significantly below its cost, the deteriorating financial condition of the issuer of a security and the occurrence of industry, company and geographic events that have negatively impacted the value of a security or rating agency downgrades. In our determination, no investments trading below cost had declined on an other than temporary basis during the second quarter of 2006. Losses of $479,033 were included in net realized investment gains for investments trading below cost that we determined had declined on an other than temporary basis during the second quarter of 2005. We determined that certain investments trading below cost had declined on an other than temporary basis during the first six months of 2006 and 2005. Losses of $47,538 and $618,882 were included in net realized investment gains for these investments in the first six months of 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Policy Acquisition Costs

     Policy acquisition costs, consisting primarily of commissions, premium taxes and certain other underwriting costs that vary with and are directly related to the production of business, are deferred and amortized over the period in which the premiums are earned. The method followed in computing deferred policy acquisition costs limits the amount of such deferred costs to their estimated realizable value, which gives effect to the premium to be earned, related investment income, losses and loss expenses and certain other costs expected to be incurred as the premium is earned. Estimates in the calculation of policy

acquisition costs have not shown material variability because of uncertainties in applying accounting principles or as a result of sensitivities to changes in key assumptions.

     Net Premiums Written. Net premiums written for the three months ended June 30, 2006 were $80.1 million, a decrease of $218,000, or 0.3%, over the comparable period in 2005. Commercial lines net premiums written decreased $1.9 million, or 6.0%, in the second quarter of 2006 compared to the comparable period in 2005. Personal lines net premiums written increased $1.7 million, or 3.5%, in the second quarter of 2006 compared to the comparable period in 2005. We have benefited during the second quarter of 2006 from the addition of the personal lines new business related to the Shelby acquisition rights agreement. Net premiums written related to this agreement amounted to $1.2 million in the second quarter of 2006.

     Net Premiums Earned. Net premiums earned increased to $75.1 million for the second quarter of 2006, an increase of $1.6 million, or 2.2%, over the second quarter of 2005. Premiums are earned, or recognized as revenue, over the terms of our policies, which are one year or less in duration. Therefore, increases or decreases in net premiums earned generally reflect increases or decreases in net premiums written in the preceding twelve-month period compared to the comparable period one year earlier.

     Investment Income. For the three months ended June 30, 2006, our net investment income increased 16.0% to $5.1 million, compared to $4.4 million for the comparable period one year ago. An increase in average invested assets from $515.9 million in the second quarter of 2005 to $555.7 million in the second quarter of 2006 and an increase in the annualized average rate of return on investments from 3.4% for the second quarter of 2005 to 3.6% for the second quarter of 2006 accounted for the increase in net investment income. The increase in our annualized average return reflects a shift from short-term investments to higher yielding fixed maturities in our investment portfolio in 2005 as well as higher short-term interest rates during the second quarter of 2006 compared to the comparable period a year earlier. These increases were offset in part by decreases in our annualized average rate of return on our increased holdings of tax-exempt fixed maturities in our investment portfolio during the second quarter of 2006 compared to the comparable period a year earlier. The increased holdings of tax-exempt fixed maturities in 2006 resulted from a shift from taxable to tax-exempt fixed maturities in order to obtain more favorable after-tax yields.

     Net Realized Investment Gains. Net realized investment gains in the second quarter of 2006 were $407,248, compared to $420,061 for the comparable period in 2005. No impairment charges were recognized in 2006, compared to $479,033 for the comparable period in 2005. Excluding impairment charges, net realized investment gains in both periods resulted from normal turnover within our investment portfolio.

     Losses and Loss Expenses. Our loss ratio, which is the ratio of incurred losses and loss expenses to premiums earned, in the second quarter of 2006 was 54.3%, compared to 54.2% in the second quarter of 2005. Our commercial lines loss ratio decreased to 50.1% in the second quarter of 2006, compared to 51.5% in the second quarter of 2005, primarily due to an decrease in our commercial multi-peril loss ratio as a result of a slight decrease in claim severity in that line of business. Our personal lines loss ratio increased from 55.3% in the second quarter of 2005 to 57.2% in the second quarter of 2006 due to an increase in our private passenger auto loss ratio primarily related to a slight increase in claim severity in that line of business.

     Underwriting Expenses. Our expense ratio, which is the ratio of policy acquisition costs and other underwriting expenses to premiums earned, for the second quarter of 2006 was 33.5%, compared to 35.0% in the second quarter of 2005. The slight decrease in the second quarter of 2006 expense ratio reflects decreases in estimated guaranty fund assessments and underwriting-based incentive compensation.

     Combined Ratio. The combined ratio was 88.0% and 89.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The combined ratio represents the sum of the loss ratio, expense ratio and dividend ratio, which is the ratio of workers’ compensation policy dividends incurred to premiums earned. The slight improvement in the combined ratio was largely attributable to the decrease in the expense ratio for the 2006 period compared to the 2005 period.

     Interest Expense. Interest expense for the second quarter of 2006 was $691,516, compared to $542,738 for the second quarter of 2005, and reflected an increase in average interest rates on our subordinated debentures in the second quarter of 2006 compared to the comparable period in 2005.

     Income Taxes. Income tax expense was $4.2 million for the second quarter of 2006, representing an effective tax rate of 29.3%, compared to $3.8 million for the second quarter of 2005, representing an effective tax rate of 29.9%. The change in effective tax rates is primarily due to tax-exempt interest income representing a larger proportion of income before income tax expense in the 2006 period compared to the 2005 period.

     Net Income and Earnings Per Share. Our net income for the second quarter of 2006 was $10.2 million, or $.40 per share on a diluted basis, an increase of 14.6% over the net income of $8.9 million, or $.36 per share on a diluted basis, reported for the second quarter of 2005. Our fully diluted shares outstanding for the second quarter of 2006 increased to 25.6 million, compared to 24.7 million for the second quarter of 2005.

     Net Premiums Written. Net premiums written for the six months ended June 30, 2006 were $156.3 million, an increase of $1.5 million, or 1.0%, over the comparable period in 2005. Commercial lines net premiums written decreased $2.3 million, or 3.6%, in the first half of 2006 compared to the comparable period in 2005. Personal lines net premiums written increased $3.8 million, or 4.1%, in the first half of 2006 compared to the comparable period in 2005. We have benefited during the first half of 2006 from the addition of the personal lines new business related to the Shelby acquisition rights agreement. Net premiums written related to this agreement amounted to $2.9 million for the first six months of 2006.

     Net Premiums Earned. Net premiums earned increased to $149.6 million for the first half of 2006, an increase of $4.4 million, or 3.0%, over the first half of 2005. Premiums are earned, or recognized as revenue, over the terms of our policies, which are one year or less in duration. Therefore, increases or decreases in net premiums earned generally reflect increases or decreases in net premiums written in the preceding twelve-month period compared to the comparable period one year earlier.

     Investment Income. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, our net investment income increased 13.6% to $10.0 million, compared to $8.8 million for the comparable period one year ago. An increase in average invested assets from $513.4 million in the first half of 2005 to $554.5 million in the first half of 2006 and an increase in the annualized average rate of return on investments from 3.4% for the first half of 2005 to 3.6% for the first half of 2006 accounted for the increase in net investment income. We realized increases in our annualized average rate of return as a result of a shift from short-term investments to higher yielding fixed maturities in our investment portfolio in 2005 as well as higher short-term interest rates during the first half of 2006 compared to the comparable period a year earlier. These increases were offset in part by decreases in our annualized average rate of return on increased holdings of tax-exempt fixed maturities in our investment portfolio during the first half of 2006 compared to the comparable period a year earlier.

     Net Realized Investment Gains. Net realized investment gains in the first half of 2006 were $882,047, compared to $1.1 million for the comparable period in 2005. Impairment charges of $47,538 were recognized in the first half of 2006, compared to impairment charges of $618,882 recognized in the first half of 2005. The impairment charges for both periods were the result of declines in the market value of equity securities that we deemed to be other than temporary. The remaining net realized investment gains and losses in both periods resulted from normal turnover within our investment portfolio.

     Losses and Loss Expenses. Our loss ratio in the first half of 2006 was 56.2%, compared to 56.0% in the first half of 2005. The commercial lines loss ratio improved slightly to 51.4% in the first half of 2006, compared to 51.7% in the first half of 2005, primarily due to improved experience in our worker’s compensation line of business. The personal lines loss ratio decreased from 66.1% in the first half of 2005 to 59.6% in the first half of 2006 due to decreased claim severity in our personal automobile and homeowners lines of business.

     Underwriting Expenses. Our expense ratio for the first half of 2006 was 32.7%, compared to 33.7% in the first half of 2005. The decrease in the first half of 2006 expense ratio reflects decreases in estimated guaranty fund assessments and underwriting-based incentive compensation.

     Combined Ratio. The combined ratio was 89.2% and 90.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The combined ratio represents the sum of the loss ratio, expense ratio and dividend ratio. The improvement in the combined ratio was largely attributable to the decrease in the expense ratio for the 2006 period compared to the 2005 period.

     Interest Expense. Interest expense for the first half of 2006 was $1.3 million, compared to $1.0 million for the first half of 2005, and reflected an increase in average interest rates on our subordinated debentures in the first six months of 2006 compared to the comparable period in 2005.

     Income Taxes. Income tax expense was $7.9 million for the first half of 2006, representing an effective tax rate of 29.0%, compared to $7.5 million for the first half of 2005, representing an effective tax rate of 30.2%. The change in effective tax rates is primarily due to tax-exempt interest income representing a greater proportion of net income before taxes in the 2006 period compared to the 2005 period.

     Net Income and Earnings Per Share. Our net income for the first half of 2006 was $19.4 million, or $.76 per share on a diluted basis, an increase of 12.1% over our net income of 17.3 million, or $.71 per share on a diluted basis, reported for the first half of 2005. Our fully diluted shares outstanding for the first half of 2006 increased to 25.4 million, compared to 24.7 million for the first half of 2005.

     Liquidity is a measure of an entity’s ability to secure enough cash to meet its contractual obligations and operating needs as they arise. Our major sources of funds from operations are the net cash flows generated from our insurance subsidiaries’ underwriting results, investment income and maturing investments.

     We have historically generated sufficient net positive cash flow from our operations to fund our commitments and build our investment portfolio, thereby increasing future investment returns. The impact of the pooling agreement with Donegal Mutual historically has been cash flow positive because of the historical underwriting profitability of the pool. The pool is settled monthly, thereby resulting in cash flows substantially similar to cash flows that would result from the underwriting of direct business. We have not experienced any unusual variations in the timing of claim payments associated with our loss reserves. We maintain a high degree of liquidity in our investment portfolio in the form of readily marketable fixed maturities, equity securities and short-term investments. Our fixed-maturity investment portfolio is structured following a “laddering” approach, so that projected cash flows from investment income and principal maturities are evenly distributed from a timing perspective, thereby providing an additional measure of liquidity to meet our obligations should an unexpected variation occur in the future. Net cash flows provided by operating activities in the first six months of 2006 and 2005 were $15.4 million and $21.8 million, respectively. The decrease in our net cash flows provided by operating activities was primarily due to a decrease in the rate of growth of our net premiums written in the first six months of 2006 compared to the first six months of 2005.

     On November 25, 2003, we entered into a credit agreement with Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company (“M&T”) relating to a four-year $35.0 million unsecured, revolving line of credit. As of June 30, 2006, we have the ability to borrow $35.0 million at interest rates equal to M&T’s current prime rate or the then current LIBOR rate plus between 1.50% and 1.75%, depending on our leverage ratio. In addition, we pay a fee of 0.15% per annum on the loan commitment amount, regardless of usage. The agreement requires our compliance with certain covenants, which include minimum levels of our net worth, leverage ratio and statutory surplus and A.M. Best ratings of our insurance subsidiaries. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, we had no borrowings outstanding under the credit agreement, and we were in compliance with all requirements of the credit agreement. On July 20, 2006, we amended the agreement with M&T to extend the credit agreement for four years from the date of amendment on substantially the same terms.

     The following table shows our expected payments for significant contractual obligations as of June 30, 2006.

     The timing of the amounts for the net liability for unpaid losses and loss expenses is estimated based on historical experience and expectations of future payment patterns. The liability has been shown net of reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses and loss expenses to reflect expected future cash flows related to such liability. Assumed amounts from the pooling agreement with Donegal Mutual represent a substantial portion of our gross liability for unpaid losses and loss expenses, and ceded amounts to the pooling agreement represent a substantial portion of our reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses and loss expenses. Future cash settlement of our assumed liability from the pool will be included in monthly settlements of pooled activity, wherein amounts ceded to and assumed from the pool are netted. Although Donegal Mutual and we do not anticipate any changes in the pool participation levels in the foreseeable future, any such change would be prospective in nature and therefore would not impact the timing of expected payments for our proportionate liability for pooled losses occurring in periods prior to the effective date of such change.

     On April 6, 2006, our board of directors declared a four-for-three stock split of our Class A common stock and our Class B common stock in the form of a 33-1/3% stock dividend with a record date of April 17, 2006 and a distribution date of April 26, 2006.

     On July 20, 2006, our board of directors declared regular quarterly cash dividends of 8.25 cents per share for our Class A common stock and 7.0 cents per share for our Class B common stock, payable August 15, 2006 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on August 1, 2006. There are no regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends to our stockholders, although there are state law restrictions on the payment of dividends from our insurance subsidiaries to us. Our insurance subsidiaries are required by law to maintain certain minimum surplus on a statutory basis, and are subject to regulations under which payment of dividends from statutory surplus is restricted and may require prior approval of the applicable domiciliary insurance regulatory authorities. Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to risk-based capital (RBC) requirements. At December 31, 2005, our insurance subsidiaries’ capital levels were each substantially above RBC requirements. At January 1, 2006, amounts available for distribution as dividends to us from our insurance subsidiaries without prior approval of their domiciliary insurance regulatory authorities were $21.9 million from Atlantic States, $5.4 million from Southern, $2.1 million from Le Mars and $2.9 million from Peninsula, all of which remained available at June 30, 2006.

     As of June 30, 2006, we had no material commitments for capital expenditures.

     Our portfolio of marketable equity securities, which is carried on our consolidated balance sheets at estimated fair value, has exposure to the risk of loss resulting from an adverse change in prices. We manage this risk by performing an analysis of prospective investments and through regular reviews of our portfolio by our investment staff.

     Our portfolio of fixed-maturity securities and, to a lesser extent, our portfolio of short-term investments is subject to credit risk. This risk is defined as the potential loss in market value resulting from adverse changes in the borrower’s ability to repay the debt. We manage this risk by performing an analysis of prospective investments and through regular reviews of our portfolio by our investment staff. We also limit the percentage and amount of our total investment portfolio that can be invested in the securities of any one issuer.

     We provide property and liability insurance coverages through independent insurance agencies located throughout our operating area. The majority of this business is billed directly to the insured, although a portion of our commercial business is billed through our agents to whom we extend credit in the normal course of business.

     Because the pooling agreement does not relieve Atlantic States of primary liability as the originating insurer, we are subject to a concentration of credit risk arising from business ceded to Donegal Mutual. Our insurance subsidiaries maintain reinsurance agreements in place with Donegal Mutual and with a number of other major unaffiliated authorized reinsurers.

     Property and casualty insurance premium rates are established before the amount of losses and loss settlement expenses, or the extent to which inflation may impact such expenses, are known. Consequently, we attempt, in establishing rates, to anticipate the potential impact of inflation.

     The business, results of operations and financial condition, and therefore the value of our common stock, are subject to a number of risks. For a description of certain risks, reference is made to our 2005 annual report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 13, 2006.

     Our market risk generally represents the risk of gain or loss that may result from the potential change in the fair value of our investment portfolio as a result of fluctuations in prices and interest rates and, to a lesser extent, our debt obligations. We attempt to manage our interest rate risk by maintaining an appropriate relationship between the average duration of the investment portfolio and the approximate duration of our liabilities, i.e., policy claims and debt obligations.

     We have maintained approximately the same investment mix and duration of our investment portfolio to our liabilities from December 31, 2005 to June 30, 2006.

     There have been no material changes to our quantitative or qualitative market risk exposure from December 31, 2005 through June 30, 2006.

     We conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information we (including our consolidated subsidiaries) are required to disclose in our periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

     There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

     Certain forward-looking statements contained herein involve risks and uncertainties. These statements include certain discussions relating to underwriting, premium and investment income volume, business strategies and our business activities during 2006 and beyond. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “project,” “predict,” “potential” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements reflect our current views about future events, are based on assumptions that reflect current conditions and are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by these forward-looking statements. Many of the factors that will determine future events or our future results of operations are beyond our ability to control or predict.

     None.

     None.

     We held our annual meeting of stockholders on April 20, 2006 (the “Meeting”), with the following results:

     The total number of votes represented at the Meeting in person or by proxy was 5,191,483 of the 5,611,083 votes for holders of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Meeting.

     On the resolution to elect Jon M. Mahan, Donald H. Nikolaus and Richard D. Wampler, II as Class B Directors to serve until the expiration of their respective terms and until their successors are duly elected, the nominees for director received the number of votes set forth opposite their respective names below:

     There were no abstentions or broker non-votes recorded. On the basis of the above vote, Jon M. Mahan, Donald H. Nikolaus and Richard D. Wampler, II were elected as Class B Directors to serve until the expiration of their respective terms and until their successors are duly elected.

     None.

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.