Companies:
10,652
total market cap:
$141.888 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ USD
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
EastGroup Properties
EGP
#2030
Rank
$10.16 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
$190.49
Share price
0.31%
Change (1 day)
9.61%
Change (1 year)
๐ Real estate
๐ฐ Investment
๐๏ธ REITs
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
Annual Reports (10-K)
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Stock Splits
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
EastGroup Properties
Annual Reports (10-K)
Financial Year 2017
EastGroup Properties - 10-K annual report 2017
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2017
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-07094
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC.
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
MARYLAND
13-2711135
(State or other jurisdiction
(I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization)
Identification No.)
400 W PARKWAY PLACE
SUITE 100
RIDGELAND, MISSISSIPPI
39157
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip code)
Registrant’s telephone number: (601) 354-3555
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $.0001 PAR VALUE,
NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT: NONE
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES (x) NO ( )
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. YES ( ) NO (x)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES (x) NO ( )
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES (x) NO ( )
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. (x)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer (x)
Accelerated Filer ( )
Non-accelerated Filer ( )
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller Reporting Company ( )
Emerging Growth Company ( )
1
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ( )
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES ( ) NO (x)
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of June 30, 2017, the last business day of the Registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter: $2,789,236,000.
The number of shares of common stock, $.0001 par value, outstanding as of
February 13, 2018
was
34,738,860
.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the
2018
Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part
III.
2
Page
PART I
Item 1.
Business
4
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
5
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
11
Item 2.
Properties
11
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
11
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
11
PART II
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
12
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data
14
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
15
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
36
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
37
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
37
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
37
Item 9B.
Other Information
37
PART III
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
38
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
38
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
39
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
39
Item 14.
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
39
PART IV
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
40
3
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
Organization
EastGroup Properties, Inc. (the Company or EastGroup) is an equity real estate investment trust (REIT) organized in 1969. The Company has elected to be taxed and intends to continue to qualify as a REIT under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code), as amended.
Available Information
The Company maintains a website at eastgroup.net. The Company posts its annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after it electronically files or furnishes such materials to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In addition, the Company's website includes items related to corporate governance matters, including, among other things, the Company's corporate governance guidelines, charters of various committees of the Board of Directors, and the Company's code of business conduct and ethics applicable to all employees, officers and directors. The Company intends to disclose on its website any amendment to, or waiver of, any provision of this code of business conduct and ethics applicable to the Company's directors and executive officers that would otherwise be required to be disclosed under the rules of the SEC or the New York Stock Exchange. Copies of these reports and corporate governance documents may be obtained, free of charge, from the Company's website. Any shareholder also may obtain copies of these documents, free of charge, by sending a request in writing to: Investor Relations, EastGroup Properties, Inc., 400 W. Parkway Place, Suite 100, Ridgeland, MS 39157.
Administration
EastGroup maintains its principal executive office and headquarters in Ridgeland, Mississippi. The Company also has regional offices in Orlando, Dallas and Los Angeles and asset management offices in Charlotte, Houston and Phoenix. EastGroup has property management offices in Jacksonville, Tampa, Ft. Lauderdale and San Antonio. Offices at these locations allow the Company to provide property management services to all of its Florida, Texas (except Austin and El Paso), Arizona, Mississippi and North Carolina properties, which together account for 78% of the Company’s total portfolio on a square foot basis. In addition, the Company currently provides property administration (accounting of operations) for its entire portfolio. The regional offices in Florida, Texas and California provide oversight of the Company's development program. As of
February 13, 2018
, EastGroup had 69 full-time employees and 2 part-time employees.
Operations
EastGroup's goal is to maximize shareholder value by being a leading provider in its markets of functional, flexible and quality business distribution space for location sensitive customers primarily in the 15,000 to 50,000 square foot range. The Company develops, acquires and operates distribution facilities, the majority of which are clustered around major transportation features in supply-constrained submarkets in major Sunbelt regions. The Company's core markets are in the states of Florida, Texas, Arizona, California and North Carolina. Over 99% of the Company’s revenue consists of rental income from real estate properties.
During
2017
, EastGroup increased its holdings in real estate properties through its acquisition and development programs. The Company purchased 840,000 square feet of properties and 90 acres of land for a total of $82 million. Also during
2017
, the Company began construction of 12 development projects containing 1.3 million square feet and transferred
12
projects, which contain
2.2 million
square feet and had costs of
$160.1 million
at the date of transfer, from its development program to real estate properties.
Typically, the Company initially funds its development and acquisition programs through its $335 million unsecured bank credit facilities. As market conditions permit, EastGroup issues equity and/or employs fixed-rate debt, including variable-rate debt that has been swapped to an effectively fixed rate through the use of interest rate swaps, to replace short-term bank borrowings. In May 2017, Moody's Investors Service affirmed the Company's issuer rating of Baa2 with a stable outlook. A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold securities and may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating agency. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. For future debt issuances, the Company intends to issue primarily unsecured fixed-rate debt, including variable-rate debt that has been swapped to an effectively fixed rate through the use of interest rate swaps. The Company may also access the public debt market in the future as a means to raise capital.
EastGroup holds its properties as long-term investments but may determine to sell certain properties that no longer meet its investment criteria. The Company may provide financing in connection with such sales of property if market conditions require. In addition, the Company may provide financing to a partner or co-owner in connection with an acquisition of real estate in certain situations.
4
Subject to the requirements necessary to maintain EastGroup’s qualifications as a REIT, the Company may acquire securities of entities engaged in real estate activities or securities of other issuers, including for the purpose of exercising control over those entities.
The Company intends to continue to qualify as a REIT under the Code. To maintain its status as a REIT, the Company is required to distribute at least 90% of its ordinary taxable income to its stockholders. If the Company has a capital gain, it has the option of (i) deferring recognition of the capital gain through a tax-deferred exchange, (ii) declaring and paying a capital gain dividend on any recognized net capital gain resulting in no corporate level tax, or (iii) retaining and paying corporate income tax on its net long-term capital gain, with shareholders reporting their proportional share of the undistributed long-term capital gain and receiving a credit or refund of their share of the tax paid by the Company.
EastGroup has no present intention of acting as an underwriter of offerings of securities of other issuers. The strategies and policies set forth above were determined and are subject to review by EastGroup's Board of Directors, which may change such strategies or policies based upon its evaluation of the state of the real estate market, the performance of EastGroup's assets, capital and credit market conditions, and other relevant factors. EastGroup provides annual reports to its stockholders, which contain financial statements audited by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.
Environmental Matters
Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, an owner of real estate may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances on or in such property. Many such laws impose liability without regard to whether the owner knows of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. The presence of such substances, or the failure to properly remediate such substances, may adversely affect the owner’s ability to sell or rent such property or to use such property as collateral in its borrowings. EastGroup’s properties have been subjected to Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) by independent environmental consultants and, as necessary, have been subjected to Phase II ESAs. These reports have not revealed any potential significant environmental liability. Management of EastGroup is not aware of any environmental liability that would have a material adverse effect on EastGroup’s business, assets, financial position or results of operations.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
In addition to the other information contained or incorporated by reference in this document, readers should carefully consider the following risk factors. Any of these risks or the occurrence of any one or more of the uncertainties described below could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and the performance of its business. The Company refers to itself as "we", "us" or "our" in the following risk factors.
Real Estate Industry Risks
We face risks associated with local real estate conditions in areas where we own properties.
We may be adversely affected by general economic conditions and local real estate conditions. For example, an oversupply of industrial properties in a local area or a decline in the attractiveness of our properties to tenants would have a negative effect on us. Other factors that may affect general economic conditions or local real estate conditions include:
•
population and demographic trends;
•
employment and personal income trends;
•
income and other tax laws;
•
changes in interest rates and availability and costs of financing;
•
increased operating costs, including insurance premiums, utilities and real estate taxes, due to inflation and other factors which may not necessarily be offset by increased rents;
•
changes in the price of oil; and
•
construction costs.
We may be unable to compete for properties and tenants
. The real estate business is highly competitive. We compete for interests in properties with other real estate investors and purchasers, some of whom have greater financial resources, revenues and geographical diversity than we have. Furthermore, we compete for tenants with other property owners. All of our industrial properties are subject to significant local competition. We also compete with a wide variety of institutions and other investors for capital funds necessary to support our investment activities and asset growth.
We are subject to significant regulation that constrains our activities.
Local zoning and land use laws, environmental statutes and other governmental requirements restrict our expansion, rehabilitation and reconstruction activities. These regulations may prevent
5
us from taking advantage of economic opportunities. Legislation such as the Americans with Disabilities Act may require us to modify our properties, and noncompliance could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants. Future legislation may impose additional requirements. We cannot predict what requirements may be enacted or what changes may be implemented to existing legislation.
Risks Associated with Our Properties
We may be unable to lease space.
When a lease expires, a tenant may elect not to renew it. We may not be able to re-lease the property on similar terms, if we are able to re-lease the property at all. The terms of renewal or re-lease (including the cost of required renovations and/or concessions to tenants) may be less favorable to us than the prior lease. We also routinely develop properties with no pre-leasing. If we are unable to lease all or a substantial portion of our properties, or if the rental rates upon such leasing are significantly lower than expected rates, our cash generated before debt repayments and capital expenditures and our ability to make expected distributions to stockholders may be adversely affected.
We have been and may continue to be affected negatively by tenant bankruptcies and leasing delays.
At any time, a tenant may experience a downturn in its business that may weaken its financial condition. Similarly, a general decline in the economy may result in a decline in the demand for space at our industrial properties. As a result, our tenants may delay lease commencement, fail to make rental payments when due, or declare bankruptcy. Any such event could result in the termination of that tenant’s lease and losses to us, and distributions to investors may decrease. We receive a substantial portion of our income as rents under mid-term and long-term leases. If tenants are unable to comply with the terms of their leases because of rising costs or falling sales, we may deem it advisable to modify lease terms to allow tenants to pay a lower rent or a smaller share of taxes, insurance and other operating costs. If a tenant becomes insolvent or bankrupt, we cannot be sure that we could recover the premises from the tenant promptly or from a trustee or debtor-in-possession in any bankruptcy proceeding relating to the tenant. We also cannot be sure that we would receive rent in the proceeding sufficient to cover our expenses with respect to the premises. If a tenant becomes bankrupt, the federal bankruptcy code will apply and, in some instances, may restrict the amount and recoverability of our claims against the tenant. A tenant’s default on its obligations to us could adversely affect our financial condition and the cash we have available for distribution.
We face risks associated with our property development.
We intend to continue to develop properties where market conditions warrant such investment. Once made, our investments may not produce results in accordance with our expectations. Risks associated with our current and future development and construction activities include:
•
the availability of favorable financing alternatives;
•
the risk that we may not be able to obtain land on which to develop or that due to the increased cost of land, our activities may not be as profitable;
•
construction costs exceeding original estimates due to rising interest rates and increases in the costs of materials and labor;
•
construction and lease-up delays resulting in increased debt service, fixed expenses and construction costs;
•
expenditure of funds and devotion of management's time to projects that we do not complete;
•
fluctuations of occupancy and rental rates at newly completed properties, which depend on a number of factors, including market and economic conditions, resulting in lower than projected rental rates and a corresponding lower return on our investment; and
•
complications (including building moratoriums and anti-growth legislation) in obtaining necessary zoning, occupancy and other governmental permits.
We face risks associated with property acquisitions
. We acquire individual properties and portfolios of properties and intend to continue to do so. Our acquisition activities and their success are subject to the following risks:
•
when we are able to locate a desired property, competition from other real estate investors may significantly increase the purchase price;
•
acquired properties may fail to perform as expected;
•
the actual costs of repositioning or redeveloping acquired properties may be higher than our estimates;
•
acquired properties may be located in new markets where we face risks associated with an incomplete knowledge or understanding of the local market, a limited number of established business relationships in the area and a relative unfamiliarity with local governmental and permitting procedures;
•
we may be unable to quickly and efficiently integrate new acquisitions, particularly acquisitions of portfolios of properties, into our existing operations, and as a result, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected; and
6
•
we may acquire properties subject to liabilities and without any recourse, or with only limited recourse, to the transferor with respect to unknown liabilities. As a result, if a claim were asserted against us based upon ownership of those properties, we might have to pay substantial sums to settle it, which could adversely affect our cash flow.
Coverage under our existing insurance policies may be inadequate to cover losses
. We generally maintain insurance policies related to our business, including casualty, general liability and other policies, covering our business operations, employees and assets as appropriate for the markets where our properties and business operations are located. However, we would be required to bear all losses that are not adequately covered by insurance. In addition, there may be certain losses that are not generally insured against or that are not generally fully insured against because it is not deemed economically feasible or prudent to do so, including losses due to floods, wind, earthquakes, acts of war, acts of terrorism or riots. If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occurs with respect to one or more of our properties, then we could lose the capital we invested in the properties, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the properties. In addition, if the damaged properties are subject to recourse indebtedness, we would continue to be liable for the indebtedness, even if these properties were irreparably damaged.
We face risks due to lack of geographic and real estate sector diversity.
Substantially all of our properties are located in the Sunbelt region of the United States with an emphasis in the states of Florida, Texas, Arizona, California and North Carolina. As of
December 31, 2017
, we owned operating properties totaling 5.5 million square feet in Houston and 4.2 million square feet in Tampa, which represent 14.8% and 11.4%, respectively, of the Company's total
Real estate properties
on a square foot basis. A downturn in general economic conditions and local real estate conditions in these geographic regions, as a result of oversupply of or reduced demand for industrial properties, local business climate, business layoffs and changing demographics, would have a particularly strong adverse effect on us. Our investments in real estate assets are concentrated in the industrial distribution sector. This concentration may expose us to the risk of economic downturns in this sector to a greater extent than if our business activities included other sectors of the real estate industry.
We face risks due to the illiquidity of real estate which may limit our ability to vary our portfolio.
Real estate investments are relatively illiquid. Our ability to vary our portfolio in response to changes in economic and other conditions will therefore be limited. In addition, because of our status as a REIT, the Internal Revenue Code limits our ability to sell our properties. If we must sell an investment, we cannot ensure that we will be able to dispose of the investment on terms favorable to the Company.
We are subject to environmental laws and regulations.
Current and previous real estate owners and operators may be required under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations to investigate and clean up hazardous substances released at the properties they own or operate. They may also be liable to the government or to third parties for substantial property or natural resource damage, investigation costs and cleanup costs. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of such hazardous substances. In addition, some environmental laws create a lien on the contaminated site in favor of the government for damages and costs the government incurs in connection with the contamination. Contamination may adversely affect the owner’s ability to use, sell or lease real estate or to borrow using the real estate as collateral. We have no way of determining at this time the magnitude of any potential liability to which we may be subject arising out of environmental conditions or violations with respect to the properties we currently or formerly owned. Environmental laws today can impose liability on a previous owner or operator of a property that owned or operated the property at a time when hazardous or toxic substances were disposed of, released from, or present at the property. A conveyance of the property, therefore, may not relieve the owner or operator from liability. Although ESAs have been conducted at our properties to identify potential sources of contamination at the properties, such ESAs do not reveal all environmental liabilities or compliance concerns that could arise from the properties. Moreover, material environmental liabilities or compliance concerns may exist, of which we are currently unaware, that in the future may have a material adverse effect on our business, assets or results of operations.
Compliance with new laws or regulations related to climate change, including compliance with “green” building codes, may require us to make improvements to our existing properties.
Proposed legislation could also increase the costs of energy and utilities. The cost of the proposed legislation may adversely affect our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. We may be adversely affected by floods, hurricanes and other climate related events.
Financing Risks
We face risks associated with the use of debt to fund acquisitions and developments, including refinancing risk.
We are subject to the risks normally associated with debt financing, including the risk that our cash flow will be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest. In addition, certain of our debt will have significant outstanding principal balances on their maturity dates, commonly known as “balloon payments.” Therefore, we will likely need to refinance at least a portion of our outstanding debt as it matures. There is a risk that we may not be able to refinance existing debt or that the terms of any refinancing will not be as favorable as the terms of the existing debt.
7
We face risks associated with our dependence on external sources of capital.
In order to qualify as a REIT, we are required each year to distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our ordinary taxable income, and we are subject to tax on our income to the extent it is not distributed. Because of this distribution requirement, we may not be able to fund all future capital needs from cash retained from operations. As a result, to fund capital needs, we rely on third-party sources of capital, which we may not be able to obtain on favorable terms, if at all. Our access to third-party sources of capital depends upon a number of factors, including (i) general market conditions; (ii) the market’s perception of our growth potential; (iii) our current and potential future earnings and cash distributions; and (iv) the market price of our capital stock. Additional debt financing may substantially increase our debt-to-total market capitalization ratio. Additional equity financing may dilute the holdings of our current stockholders.
Covenants in our credit agreements could limit our flexibility and adversely affect our financial condition
. The terms of our various credit agreements and other indebtedness require us to comply with a number of customary financial and other covenants, such as maintaining debt service coverage and leverage ratios and maintaining insurance coverage. These covenants may limit our flexibility in our operations, and breaches of these covenants could result in defaults under the instruments governing the applicable indebtedness even if we had satisfied our payment obligations. If we are unable to refinance our indebtedness at maturity or meet our payment obligations, the amount of our distributable cash flow and our financial condition would be adversely affected.
Adverse changes in our credit ratings could impair our ability to obtain additional debt and equity financing on favorable terms, if at all.
Our credit ratings are based on our operating performance, liquidity and leverage ratios, overall financial position and other factors employed by the credit rating agencies in their rating analysis of us. Our credit ratings can affect the amount and type of capital we can access, as well as the terms of any financings we may obtain. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our current credit ratings. In the event our current credit ratings deteriorate, it may be more difficult or expensive to obtain additional financing or refinance existing obligations and commitments. Also, a downgrade in our credit ratings would trigger additional costs or other potentially negative consequences under our current and future credit facilities and debt instruments.
Increases in interest rates would increase our interest expense.
At
December 31, 2017
, we had $116.3 million of variable-rate debt outstanding not protected by interest rate hedge contracts. We may incur additional variable-rate debt in the future. If interest rates increase, then so would the interest expense on our unhedged variable-rate debt, which would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. From time to time, we manage our exposure to interest rate risk with interest rate hedge contracts that effectively fix or cap a portion of our variable-rate debt. In addition, we refinance fixed-rate debt at times when we believe rates and terms are appropriate. Our efforts to manage these exposures may not be successful. Our use of interest rate hedge contracts to manage risk associated with interest rate volatility may expose us to additional risks, including a risk that a counterparty to a hedge contract may fail to honor its obligations. Developing an effective interest rate risk strategy is complex and no strategy can completely insulate us from risks associated with interest rate fluctuations. There can be no assurance that our hedging activities will have the desired beneficial impact on our results of operations or financial condition. Termination of interest rate hedge contracts typically involves costs, such as transaction fees or breakage costs.
A lack of any limitation on our debt could result in our becoming more highly leveraged
. Our governing documents do not limit the amount of indebtedness we may incur. Accordingly, we may incur additional debt and would do so, for example, if it were necessary to maintain our status as a REIT. We might become more highly leveraged as a result, and our financial condition and cash available for distribution to stockholders might be negatively affected and the risk of default on our indebtedness could increase.
Other Risks
The market value of our common stock could decrease based on our performance and market perception and conditions.
The market value of our common stock may be affected by the market’s perception of our operating results, growth potential, and current and future cash dividends and may also be affected by the real estate market value of our underlying assets. The market price of our common stock may be influenced by the dividend on our common stock relative to market interest rates. Rising interest rates may lead potential buyers of our common stock to expect a higher dividend rate, which would adversely affect the market price of our common stock. In addition, rising interest rates would result in increased expense, thereby adversely affecting cash flow and our ability to service our indebtedness and pay dividends.
The state of the economy or other adverse changes in general or local economic conditions may adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
Turmoil in the global financial markets may have an adverse impact on the availability of credit to businesses generally and could lead to a further weakening of the U.S. and global economies. Currently these conditions have not impaired our ability to access credit markets and finance our operations. However, our ability to access the capital markets may be restricted at a time when we would like, or need, to raise financing, which could have an impact on our flexibility to react to changing economic and business conditions. Furthermore, deteriorating economic conditions including business layoffs, downsizing, industry slowdowns and other similar factors that affect our customers could continue to negatively impact commercial real estate fundamentals and result in lower occupancy, lower rental rates and declining values in our real estate portfolio and in
8
the collateral securing any loan investments we may make. Additionally, an adverse economic situation could have an impact on our lenders or customers, causing them to fail to meet their obligations to us. No assurances can be given that the effects of an adverse economic situation will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may fail to qualify as a REIT.
If we fail to qualify as a REIT, we will not be allowed to deduct distributions to stockholders in computing our taxable income and will be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates. In addition, we may be barred from qualification as a REIT for the four years following disqualification. The additional tax incurred at regular corporate rates would significantly reduce the cash flow available for distribution to stockholders and for debt service. Furthermore, we would no longer be required by the Internal Revenue Code to make any distributions to our stockholders as a condition of REIT qualification. Any distributions to stockholders would be taxable as ordinary income to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits. Corporate distributees, however, may be eligible for the dividends received deduction on the distributions, subject to limitations under the Internal Revenue Code. To qualify as a REIT, we must comply with certain highly technical and complex requirements. We cannot be certain we have complied with these requirements because there are few judicial and administrative interpretations of these provisions. In addition, facts and circumstances that may be beyond our control may affect our ability to qualify as a REIT. We cannot assure you that new legislation, regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions will not change the tax laws significantly with respect to our qualification as a REIT or with respect to the federal income tax consequences of qualification. We cannot assure you that we will remain qualified as a REIT.
There is a risk of changes in the tax law applicable to real estate investment trusts
. Since the Internal Revenue Service, the United States Treasury Department and Congress frequently review federal income tax legislation, we cannot predict whether, when or to what extent new federal tax laws, regulations, interpretations or rulings will be adopted. Any such legislative action may prospectively or retroactively modify our tax treatment and, therefore, may adversely affect taxation of us and/or our investors.
We face possible adverse changes in tax laws.
From time to time, changes in state and local tax laws or regulations are enacted which may result in an increase in our tax liability. A shortfall in tax revenues for states and municipalities in which we operate may lead to an increase in the frequency and size of such changes. If such changes occur, we may be required to pay additional taxes on our assets or income. These increased tax costs could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and the amount of cash available for the payment of dividends.
To maintain our status as a REIT, we limit the amount of shares any one stockholder can own
. The Internal Revenue Code imposes certain limitations on the ownership of the stock of a REIT. For example, not more than 50% in value of our outstanding shares of capital stock may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Code) during the last half of any taxable year. To protect our REIT status, our charter prohibits any holder from acquiring more than 9.8% (in value or in number, whichever is more restrictive) of our outstanding equity stock (defined as all of our classes of capital stock, except our excess stock (of which there is none outstanding)) unless our Board of Directors grants a waiver. The ownership limit may limit the opportunity for stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of common stock that might otherwise exist if an investor were attempting to assemble a block of shares in excess of 9.8% of the outstanding shares of equity stock or otherwise effect a change in control.
Certain tax and anti-takeover provisions of our charter and bylaws may inhibit a change of our control
. Certain provisions contained in our charter and bylaws and the Maryland General Corporation Law may discourage a third party from making a tender offer or acquisition proposal to us. If this were to happen, it could delay, deter or prevent a change in control or the removal of existing management. These provisions also may delay or prevent the shareholders from receiving a premium for their common shares over then-prevailing market prices. These provisions include:
•
the REIT ownership limit described above;
•
special meetings of our stockholders may be called only by the chairman of the board, the chief executive officer, the president, a majority of the board or by stockholders possessing a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast at the meeting;
•
our Board of Directors may authorize and issue securities without stockholder approval; and
•
advance-notice requirements for proposals to be presented at stockholder meetings.
In addition, Maryland law provides protection for Maryland corporations against unsolicited takeovers by limiting, among other things, the duties of the directors in unsolicited takeover situations. The duties of directors of Maryland corporations do not require them to (a) accept, recommend or respond to any proposal by a person seeking to acquire control of the corporation, (b) authorize the corporation to redeem any rights under, or modify or render inapplicable, any stockholders rights plan, (c) make a determination under the Maryland Business Combination Act or the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act, or (d) act or fail to act solely because of the effect of the act or failure to act may have on an acquisition or potential acquisition of control of the corporation or the amount or type of consideration that may be offered or paid to the stockholders in an acquisition. Moreover, under Maryland
9
law the act of a director of a Maryland corporation relating to or affecting an acquisition or potential acquisition of control is not subject to any higher duty or greater scrutiny than is applied to any other act of a director. Maryland law also contains a statutory presumption that an act of a director of a Maryland corporation satisfies the applicable standards of conduct for directors under Maryland law.
The Maryland Business Combination Act provides that unless exempted, a Maryland corporation may not engage in business combinations, including mergers, dispositions of 10 percent or more of its assets, certain issuances of shares of stock and other specified transactions, with an "interested stockholder" or an affiliate of an interested stockholder for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder became an interested stockholder, and thereafter unless specified criteria are met. An interested stockholder is generally a person owning or controlling, directly or indirectly, 10 percent or more of the voting power of the outstanding stock of the Maryland corporation. These provisions of Maryland law do not apply, however, to business combinations that are approved or exempted by a board of directors prior to the time that the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. Pursuant to the statute, our Board of Directors has by resolution exempted business combinations between us and any other person and such resolution may not be revoked, altered or amended without prior stockholder approval.
The Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act provides that "control shares" of a corporation acquired in a "control share acquisition" shall have no voting rights except to the extent approved by a vote of two-thirds of the votes eligible to cast on the matter. "Control Shares" means shares of stock that, if aggregated with all other shares of stock previously acquired by the acquirer, would entitle the acquirer to exercise voting power in electing directors within one of the following ranges of the voting power: one-tenth or more but less than one-third, one-third or more but less than a majority, or a majority or more of all voting power. A "control share acquisition" means the acquisition of control shares, subject to certain exceptions.
If voting rights of control shares acquired in a control share acquisition are not approved at a stockholders' meeting, then subject to certain conditions and limitations, the issuer may redeem any or all of the control shares for fair value. If voting rights of such control shares are approved at a stockholders' meeting and the acquirer becomes entitled to vote a majority of the shares of stock entitled to vote, all other stockholders may exercise appraisal rights. Our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act any and all acquisitions by any person of our stock. Our bylaws prohibit the repeal, amendment or alteration of this provision without the approval by the Company’s stockholders; however, there can be no assurance that this provision will not be amended or eliminated at some time in the future.
The Company faces risks in attracting and retaining key personnel.
Many of our senior executives have strong industry reputations, which aid us in identifying acquisition and development opportunities and negotiating with tenants and sellers of properties. The loss of the services of these key personnel could affect our operations because of diminished relationships with existing and prospective tenants, property sellers and industry personnel. In addition, attracting new or replacement personnel may be difficult in a competitive market.
We have severance and change in control agreements with certain of our officers that may deter changes in control of the Company.
If, within a certain time period (as set in the officer’s agreement) following a change in control, we terminate the officer's employment other than for cause, or if the officer elects to terminate his or her employment with us for reasons specified in the agreement, we will make a severance payment equal to the officer's average annual compensation times an amount specified in the officer's agreement, together with the officer's base salary and vacation pay that have accrued but are unpaid through the date of termination. These agreements may deter a change in control because of the increased cost for a third party to acquire control of us.
We rely on information technology in our operations, and any material failure, inadequacy, interruption or security failure of that technology could harm our business.
We rely on information technology networks and systems, including the internet, to process, transmit and store electronic information, and to manage or support a variety of business processes, including financial transactions and records, and maintaining personal identifying information and customer and lease data. We purchase some of our information technology from vendors, on whom our systems depend. We rely on commercially available systems, software, tools and monitoring to provide security for the processing, transmission and storage of confidential customer data, including individually identifiable information relating to financial accounts. Although we have taken steps to protect the security of our information systems and the data maintained in those systems, it is possible that our safety and security measures will not prevent the systems' improper functioning or damage, or the improper access or disclosure of personally identifiable information such as in the event of cyber-attacks. Security breaches, including physical or electronic break-ins, computer viruses, attacks by hackers and similar breaches, can create system disruptions, shutdowns or unauthorized disclosure of confidential information. In some cases, it may be difficult to anticipate or immediately detect such incidents and the damage they cause. Any failure to maintain proper function, security and availability of our information systems could interrupt our operations, damage our reputation, subject us to liability claims or regulatory penalties and could have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
10
We may be impacted by changes in U.S. social, political, regulatory and economic conditions or laws and policies.
Any changes to U.S. tax laws, foreign trade, manufacturing, and development and investment in the territories and countries where our customers operate could adversely affect our operating results and our business.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
EastGroup owned 363 industrial properties and one office building at
December 31, 2017
. These properties are located primarily in the Sunbelt states of Florida, Texas, Arizona, California and North Carolina, and the majority are clustered around major transportation features in supply constrained submarkets. As of
February 13, 2018
, EastGroup’s portfolio was 96.7% leased and 96.2% occupied. The Company has developed approximately 45% of its total portfolio (on a square foot basis), including real estate properties and development properties in lease-up and under construction. The Company’s focus is the ownership of business distribution space (87% of the total portfolio) with the remainder in bulk distribution space (9%) and business service space (4%). Business distribution space properties are typically multi-tenant buildings with a building depth of 200 feet or less, clear height of 24-30 feet, office finish of 10-25% and truck courts with a depth of 100-120 feet. See Consolidated Financial Statement Schedule III – Real Estate Properties and Accumulated Depreciation for a detailed listing of the Company’s properties.
At
December 31, 2017
, EastGroup did not own any single property with a book value that was 10% or more of total book value or with gross revenues that were 10% or more of total gross revenues.
The Company's lease expirations, excluding month-to-month leases of 373,000 square feet, for the next ten years are detailed below:
Years Ending December 31,
Number of Leases Expiring
Total Area of Leases Expiring
(in Square Feet)
Annualized Current Base Rent of Leases Expiring
(1)
% of Total Base Rent of Leases Expiring
2018
275
4,111,000
$
24,273,000
11.6%
2019
289
5,699,000
$
34,637,000
16.5%
2020
313
6,263,000
$
36,519,000
17.4%
2021
207
6,324,000
$
36,079,000
17.2%
2022
149
4,671,000
$
27,920,000
13.3%
2023
85
2,696,000
$
13,275,000
6.3%
2024
58
2,736,000
$
15,600,000
7.4%
2025
17
1,156,000
$
6,184,000
2.9%
2026
16
724,000
$
4,784,000
2.3%
2027 and beyond
32
1,481,000
$
8,158,000
3.9%
(1)
Represents the monthly cash rental rates, excluding tenant expense reimbursements, as of
December 31, 2017
, multiplied by 12 months.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
The Company is not presently involved in any material litigation nor, to its knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against the Company or its properties, other than routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business or which is expected to be covered by the Company’s liability insurance.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.
Not applicable.
11
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
The Company’s shares of common stock are listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “EGP.” The following table shows the high and low share prices for each quarter reported by the New York Stock Exchange during the past two years and the per share distributions paid for each quarter.
Shares of Common Stock Market Prices and Dividends
Quarter
Calendar Year 2017
Calendar Year 2016
High
Low
Distributions
High
Low
Distributions
First
$
76.13
67.69
$
0.62
$
60.46
49.31
$
0.60
Second
87.40
73.13
0.62
69.35
58.28
0.60
Third
91.51
80.10
0.64
76.00
68.40
0.62
Fourth
95.03
86.41
0.64
74.71
63.99
0.62
$
2.52
$
2.44
As of
February 13, 2018
, there were
467
holders of record of the Company’s
34,738,860
outstanding shares of common stock. The Company distributed all of its
2017
and
2016
taxable income to its stockholders. Accordingly, no significant provisions for income taxes were necessary. The following table summarizes the federal income tax treatment for all distributions by the Company for the years
2017
and
2016
.
Federal Income Tax Treatment of Share Distributions
Years Ended December 31,
2017
2016
Common Share Distributions:
Ordinary dividends
$
2.49146
2.10494
Nondividend distributions
0.02686
0.05202
Unrecaptured Section 1250 capital gain
—
0.12872
Other capital gain
0.00168
0.15432
Total Common Distributions
$
2.52000
2.44000
Securities Authorized For Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
See Item 12 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters,” for certain information regarding the Company’s equity compensation plans.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
No shares of common stock were purchased by the Company or withheld by the Company to satisfy any tax withholding obligations during the three-month period ended December 31, 2017.
12
Performance Graph
The following graph compares, over the five years ended
December 31, 2017
, the cumulative total shareholder return on EastGroup’s common stock with the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Total Return Index (S&P 500 Total Return) and the FTSE Equity REIT index prepared by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (FTSE NAREIT Equity REITs).
The performance graph and related information shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or be deemed to be “filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing.
Fiscal years ended December 31,
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
EastGroup
$
100.00
111.69
126.46
115.72
159.16
196.32
FTSE NAREIT Equity REITs
100.00
102.47
133.35
137.62
149.35
157.16
S&P 500 Total Return
100.00
132.39
150.51
152.59
170.84
208.13
The information above assumes that the value of the investment in shares of EastGroup’s common stock and each index was $100 on December 31, 2012, and that all dividends were reinvested.
13
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial data for the Company derived from the audited consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.
Years Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
OPERATING DATA
(In thousands, except per share data)
REVENUES
Income from real estate operations
$
274,031
252,961
234,918
219,706
201,849
Other revenue
119
86
90
123
322
274,150
253,047
235,008
219,829
202,171
Expenses
Expenses from real estate operations
80,108
74,347
67,402
62,797
57,885
Depreciation and amortization
83,874
77,935
73,290
70,314
65,789
General and administrative
14,972
13,232
15,091
12,726
11,725
Acquisition costs
—
161
164
210
191
178,954
165,675
155,947
146,047
135,590
Operating income
95,196
87,372
79,061
73,782
66,581
Other income (expense)
Interest expense
(34,775
)
(35,213
)
(34,666
)
(35,486
)
(35,192
)
Gain, net of loss, on sales of real estate investments
21,855
42,170
2,903
9,188
—
Other
1,313
1,765
1,101
989
949
Income from continuing operations
83,589
96,094
48,399
48,473
32,338
Discontinued operations
Income from real estate operations
—
—
—
—
89
Gain on sales of nondepreciable real estate investments
—
—
—
—
—
Gain on sales of real estate investments
—
—
—
—
798
Income from discontinued operations
—
—
—
—
887
Net income
83,589
96,094
48,399
48,473
33,225
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in joint ventures
(406
)
(585
)
(533
)
(532
)
(610
)
Net income attributable to EastGroup Properties, Inc. common stockholders
83,183
95,509
47,866
47,941
32,615
Other comprehensive income (loss) - Cash flow hedges
3,353
5,451
(1,099
)
(3,986
)
2,021
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
$
86,536
100,960
46,767
43,955
34,636
BASIC PER COMMON SHARE DATA FOR NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
Income from continuing operations
$
2.45
2.93
1.49
1.53
1.05
Income from discontinued operations
—
—
—
—
0.03
Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
2.45
2.93
1.49
1.53
1.08
Weighted average shares outstanding
33,996
32,563
32,091
31,341
30,162
DILUTED PER COMMON SHARE DATA FOR NET INCOMEATTRIBUTABLE TO EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
Income from continuing operations
$
2.44
2.93
1.49
1.52
1.05
Income from discontinued operations
—
—
—
—
0.03
Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
2.44
2.93
1.49
1.52
1.08
Weighted average shares outstanding
34,047
32,628
32,196
31,452
30,269
AMOUNTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO EASTGROUP
PROPERTIES, INC. COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
Income from continuing operations
$
83,183
95,509
47,866
47,941
31,728
Income from discontinued operations
—
—
—
—
887
Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
83,183
95,509
47,866
47,941
32,615
OTHER PER SHARE DATA
Book value, at end of year
$
21.56
19.13
17.11
17.72
16.61
Common distributions declared
2.52
2.44
2.34
2.22
2.14
Common distributions paid
2.52
2.44
2.34
2.22
2.14
BALANCE SHEET DATA (AT END OF YEAR)
Real estate investments, at cost
(1)
$
2,590,083
2,419,414
2,232,327
2,087,821
1,938,960
Real estate investments, net of accumulated depreciation
(1)
1,840,482
1,725,164
1,574,873
1,487,295
1,388,847
Total assets
1,953,221
1,825,764
1,661,904
1,572,112
1,468,963
Unsecured bank credit facilities, unsecured debt and secured debt
1,108,282
1,101,333
1,027,909
929,465
889,296
Total liabilities
1,202,091
1,183,898
1,102,703
996,497
950,258
Noncontrolling interest in joint ventures
1,658
4,205
4,339
4,486
4,707
Total stockholders’ equity
749,472
637,661
554,862
571,129
513,998
(1)
Includes mortgage loans receivable and unconsolidated investment. See Notes 3 and 4 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
14
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
Certain statements contained in this report may be deemed “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as “will,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “believes,” “intends,” “plans,” “seeks,” “estimates,” variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements, which generally are not historical in nature. All statements that address operating performance, events or developments that the Company expects or anticipates will occur in the future, including statements relating to rent and occupancy growth, development activity, the acquisition or sale of properties, general conditions in the geographic areas where the Company operates and the availability of capital, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which the Company cannot predict, including, without limitation: changes in general economic conditions; the extent of tenant defaults or of any early lease terminations; the Company's ability to lease or re-lease space at current or anticipated rents; the availability of financing; the failure to maintain credit ratings with rating agencies; changes in the supply of and demand for industrial/warehouse properties; increases in interest rate levels; increases in operating costs; natural disasters, terrorism, riots and acts of war, and the Company's ability to obtain adequate insurance; changes in governmental regulation, tax rates and similar matters; and other risks associated with the development and acquisition of properties, including risks that development projects may not be completed on schedule, development or operating costs may be greater than anticipated or acquisitions may not close as scheduled, and those additional factors discussed under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in Part I of this report. Although the Company believes the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions at the time made, the Company can give no assurance that such expectations will be achieved. The Company assumes no obligation whatsoever to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements. See also the information contained in the Company’s reports filed or to be filed from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).
OVERVIEW
EastGroup’s goal is to maximize shareholder value by being a leading provider in its markets of functional, flexible and quality business distribution space for location sensitive customers primarily in the 15,000 to 50,000 square foot range. The Company develops, acquires and operates distribution facilities, the majority of which are clustered around major transportation features in supply constrained submarkets in major Sunbelt regions. The Company’s core markets are in the states of Florida, Texas, Arizona, California and North Carolina.
The Company believes its current operating cash flow and unsecured bank credit facilities provide the capacity to fund the operations of the Company, and the Company also believes it can issue common and/or preferred equity and obtain debt financing. During
2017
, EastGroup obtained unsecured debt totaling $60 million and issued
1,370,457
shares of common stock through its continuous common equity program, providing net proceeds to the Company of
$109 million
. EastGroup's financing and equity issuances are further described in
Liquidity and Capital Resources
.
The Company’s primary revenue is rental income; as such, EastGroup’s greatest challenge is leasing space. During
2017
, leases expired on 6,475,000 square feet (17.3% of EastGroup’s total square footage of 37,338,000), and the Company was successful in renewing or re-leasing 85% of the expiring square feet. In addition, EastGroup leased 2,120,000 square feet of other vacant space during the year. During
2017
, average rental rates on new and renewal leases increased by 16.8%. Property net operating income (PNOI) from same properties, defined as operating properties owned during the entire current period and prior year reporting period, increased 2.8% for
2017
compared to 2016.
EastGroup’s total leased percentage was 97.0% at December 31,
2017
compared to 97.3% at December 31, 2016. Leases scheduled to expire in 2018 were 11.0% of the portfolio on a square foot basis at December 31,
2017
. As of
February 13, 2018
, leases scheduled to expire during the remainder of 2018 were 9.6% of the portfolio on a square foot basis.
The Company generates new sources of leasing revenue through its development and acquisition programs. The Company mitigates risks associated with development through a Board-approved maximum level of land held for development and by adjusting development start dates according to leasing activity.
During
2017
, EastGroup acquired 840,000 square feet of properties and 90 acres of land for a total of $82 million. The Company began construction of 12 development projects containing 1,339,000 square feet in Austin, Dallas, San Antonio, Phoenix, Tampa, Orlando, and Charlotte. Also in 2017, the Company transferred
12
properties (2,197,000 square feet) in Dallas, San Antonio, Las Vegas, Orlando, Tampa, Charlotte and Phoenix from its development program to real estate properties with costs of
$160.1 million
15
at the date of transfer. As of December 31, 2017, EastGroup's development program consisted of 18 buildings (2,166,000 square feet) located in 11 cities. The projected total cost for the development projects, which were collectively 50% leased as of
February 13, 2018
, is $185 million, of which $54 million remained to be invested as of December 31,
2017
.
During
2017
, EastGroup sold 514,000 square feet of operating properties and 19 acres of land, generating gross sales proceeds of $41.8 million. The Company recognized $21,855,000 in
Gain, net of loss, on sales of real estate investments
and $293,000 in
Gain, net of loss, on sales of non-operating real estate
(included in
Other
on the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income) during
2017
.
Typically, the Company initially funds its development and acquisition programs through its $335 million unsecured bank credit facilities (as discussed in
Liquidity and Capital Resources
). As market conditions permit, EastGroup issues equity and/or employs fixed-rate debt, including variable-rate debt that has been swapped to an effectively fixed rate through the use of interest rate swaps, to replace short-term bank borrowings. In May 2017, Moody's Investors Service affirmed the Company's issuer rating of Baa2 with a stable outlook. A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating agency. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. For future debt issuances, the Company intends to issue primarily unsecured fixed-rate debt, including variable-rate debt that has been swapped to an effectively fixed rate through the use of interest rate swaps. The Company may also access the public debt market in the future as a means to raise capital.
EastGroup has one reportable segment – industrial properties. These properties are primarily located in major Sunbelt regions of the United States, have similar economic characteristics and also meet the other criteria permitting the properties to be aggregated into one reportable segment. The Company’s chief decision makers use two primary measures of operating results in making decisions: (1) property net operating income (PNOI), defined as
Income from real estate operations
less
Expenses from real estate operations
(including market-based internal management fee expense) plus the Company's share of income and property operating expenses from its less-than-wholly-owned real estate investments, and (2) funds from operations attributable to common stockholders (FFO), defined as net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders computed in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of depreciable real estate property and impairment losses, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. The Company calculates FFO based on the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts’ (NAREIT) definition.
PNOI is a supplemental industry reporting measurement used to evaluate the performance of the Company’s real estate investments. The Company believes the exclusion of depreciation and amortization in the industry’s calculation of PNOI provides a supplemental indicator of the properties’ performance since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions. PNOI as calculated by the Company may not be comparable to similarly titled but differently calculated measures for other real estate investment trusts (REITs). The major factors influencing PNOI are occupancy levels, acquisitions and sales, development properties that achieve stabilized operations, rental rate increases or decreases, and the recoverability of operating expenses. The Company’s success depends largely upon its ability to lease space and to recover from tenants the operating costs associated with those leases.
PNOI is comprised of
Income from real estate operations
, less
Expenses from real estate operations
plus the Company's share of income and property operating expenses from its less-than-wholly-owned real estate investments. PNOI was calculated as follows for the three fiscal years ended December 31,
2017
,
2016
and
2015
.
Years Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
(In thousands)
Income from real estate operations
$
274,031
252,961
234,918
Expenses from real estate operations
(80,108
)
(74,347
)
(67,402
)
Noncontrolling interest in PNOI of consolidated 80% joint ventures
(633
)
(823
)
(851
)
PNOI from 50% owned unconsolidated investment
897
906
842
PROPERTY NET OPERATING INCOME (PNOI)
$
194,187
178,697
167,507
Income from real estate operations
is comprised of rental income, expense reimbursement pass-through income and other real estate income including lease termination fees.
Expenses from real estate operations
is comprised of property taxes, insurance, utilities, repair and maintenance expenses, management fees, other operating costs and bad debt expense. Generally, the Company’s most significant operating expenses are property taxes and insurance. Tenant leases may be net leases in which the total operating expenses are recoverable, modified gross leases in which some of the operating expenses are recoverable, or gross leases in which no expenses are recoverable (gross leases represent only a small portion of the Company’s total leases). Increases in property
16
operating expenses are fully recoverable under net leases and recoverable to a high degree under modified gross leases. Modified gross leases often include base year amounts and expense increases over these amounts are recoverable. The Company’s exposure to property operating expenses is primarily due to vacancies and leases for occupied space that limit the amount of expenses that can be recovered.
The following table presents reconciliations of Net Income to PNOI for the three fiscal years ended December 31,
2017
,
2016
and
2015
.
Years Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
(In thousands)
NET INCOME
$
83,589
96,094
48,399
(Gain) loss on sales of real estate investments
(21,855
)
(42,170
)
(2,903
)
(Gain), net of loss, on sales of non-operating real estate
(293
)
(733
)
(123
)
Interest income
(247
)
(255
)
(258
)
Other income
(119
)
(86
)
(90
)
Interest rate swap ineffectiveness
—
5
—
Depreciation and amortization
83,874
77,935
73,290
Company's share of depreciation from unconsolidated investment
124
124
122
Interest expense
34,775
35,213
34,666
General and administrative expense
14,972
13,232
15,091
Acquisition costs
—
161
164
Noncontrolling interest in PNOI of consolidated 80% joint ventures
(633
)
(823
)
(851
)
PROPERTY NET OPERATING INCOME (PNOI)
$
194,187
178,697
167,507
The Company believes FFO is a meaningful supplemental measure of operating performance for equity REITs. The Company believes excluding depreciation and amortization in the calculation of FFO is appropriate since real estate values have historically increased or decreased based on market conditions. FFO is not considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indication of the Company’s financial performance, nor is it a measure of the Company’s liquidity or indicative of funds available to provide for the Company’s cash needs, including its ability to make distributions. In addition, FFO, as reported by the Company, may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition. The Company’s key drivers affecting FFO are changes in PNOI (as discussed above), interest rates, the amount of leverage the Company employs and general and administrative expenses. The following table presents reconciliations of Net Income Attributable to EastGroup Properties, Inc. Common Stockholders to FFO Attributable to Common Stockholders for the three fiscal years ended December 31,
2017
,
2016
and
2015
.
Years Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
(In thousands, except per share data)
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
$
83,183
95,509
47,866
Depreciation and amortization
83,874
77,935
73,290
Company's share of depreciation from unconsolidated investment
124
124
122
Depreciation and amortization from noncontrolling interest
(224
)
(214
)
(206
)
(Gain) loss on sales of real estate investments
(21,855
)
(42,170
)
(2,903
)
FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS (FFO) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
$
145,102
131,184
118,169
Net income attributable to common stockholders per diluted share
$
2.44
2.93
1.49
Funds from operations attributable to common stockholders per diluted share
4.26
4.02
3.67
Diluted shares for earnings per share and funds from operations
34,047
32,628
32,196
17
The Company analyzes the following performance trends in evaluating the progress of the Company:
•
The FFO change per share represents the increase or decrease in FFO per share from the current year compared to the prior year. For
2017
, FFO was
$4.26
per share compared with
$4.02
per share for
2016
, an increase of 6.0% per share.
•
For the year ended December 31,
2017
, PNOI increased by $15,490,000, or 8.7%, compared to
2016
. PNOI increased $10,327,000 from newly developed and redeveloped properties, $4,765,000 from same property operations and $3,355,000 from
2016
and
2017
acquisitions; PNOI decreased $2,767,000 from operating properties sold in 2016 and 2017.
•
The same property net operating income change represents the PNOI increase or decrease for the same operating properties owned during the entire current period and prior year reporting period. PNOI from same properties increased 2.8% for the year ended
December 31, 2017
, compared to
2016
.
•
Same property average occupancy represents the average month-end percentage of leased square footage for which the lease term has commenced as compared to the total leasable square footage for the same operating properties owned during the entire current period and prior year reporting period. Same property average occupancy for the year ended
December 31, 2017
, was 96.8% compared to 96.5% for
2016
.
•
Occupancy is the percentage of leased square footage for which the lease term has commenced as compared to the total leasable square footage as of the close of the reporting period. Occupancy at
December 31, 2017
was 96.4%. Quarter-end occupancy ranged from 94.9% to 96.8% over the previous four quarters ended
December 31, 2016
to September 30,
2017
.
•
Rental rate change represents the rental rate increase or decrease on new and renewal leases compared to the prior leases on the same space. For the year
2017
, rental rate increases on new and renewal leases (20.5% of total square footage) averaged 16.8%.
•
Lease termination fee income is included in
Income from real estate operations.
For the year
2017
, lease termination fee income was $468,000 compared to $812,000 for
2016
.
•
Bad debt expense is included in
Expenses from real estate operations.
The Company recorded bad debt expense of $499,000 in
2017
and $992,000 in
2016
.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The Company’s management considers the following accounting policies and estimates to be critical to the reported operations of the Company.
Real Estate Properties
The Company applied the principles of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 805,
Business Combinations,
when accounting for purchases of real estate until its adoption of ASU 2017-01,
Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business,
which was effective October 1, 2016. ASU 2017-01 provides a new framework for determining whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. Under the new guidance, companies are required to utilize an initial screening test to determine whether substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets; if so, the set is not a business. EastGroup has determined that some of its real estate property acquisitions may be considered to be acquisitions of groups of similar identifiable assets; therefore, the acquisitions are not considered to be acquisitions of a business.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Codification provides guidance on how to properly determine the allocation of the purchase price among the individual components of both the tangible and intangible assets based on their respective fair values. Goodwill for business combinations is recorded when the purchase price exceeds the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired. Factors considered by management in allocating the cost of the properties acquired include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. The allocation to tangible assets (land, building and improvements) is based upon management’s determination of the value of the property as if it were vacant using discounted cash flow models. The Company determines whether any financing assumed is above or below market based upon comparison to similar financing terms for similar properties. The cost of the properties acquired may be adjusted based on indebtedness assumed from the seller that is determined to be above or below market rates.
18
The purchase price is also allocated among the following categories of intangible assets: the above or below market component of in-place leases, the value of in-place leases, and the value of customer relationships. The value allocable to the above or below market component of an acquired in-place lease is determined based upon the present value (using a discount rate reflecting the risks associated with the acquired leases) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the lease over its remaining term, and (ii) management’s estimate of the amounts that would be paid using fair market rates over the remaining term of the lease. The amounts allocated to above and below market leases are included in
Other assets
and
Other liabilities
, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are amortized to rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases. The total amount of intangible assets is further allocated to in-place lease values and customer relationship values based upon management’s assessment of their respective values. These intangible assets are included in
Other assets
on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are amortized over the remaining term of the existing lease, or the anticipated life of the customer relationship, as applicable.
For properties under development and properties acquired in the development stage, costs associated with development (i.e., land, construction costs, interest expense, property taxes and other costs associated with development) are aggregated into the total capitalized costs of the property. Included in these costs are management’s estimates for the portions of internal costs (primarily personnel costs) deemed related to such development activities. The internal costs are allocated to specific development properties based on development activity.
The Company reviews its real estate investments for impairment of value whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If any real estate investment is considered permanently impaired, a loss is recorded to reduce the carrying value of the property to its estimated fair value. Real estate assets classified as held for sale are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less estimated costs of sale. The evaluation of real estate investments involves many subjective assumptions dependent upon future economic events that affect the ultimate value of the property. Currently, the Company’s management has not identified any impairment charges which should be recorded nor has it recorded any impairment charges in recent years. In the event of impairment, the property’s basis would be reduced, and the impairment would be recognized as a current period charge on the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income.
Valuation of Receivables
The Company is subject to tenant defaults and bankruptcies that could affect the collection of outstanding receivables. In order to mitigate these risks, the Company performs credit reviews and analyses on prospective tenants before significant leases are executed and on existing tenants before properties are acquired. On a quarterly basis, the Company evaluates outstanding receivables and estimates the allowance for doubtful accounts. Management specifically analyzes aged receivables, customer credit-worthiness, historical bad debts and current economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company believes its allowance for doubtful accounts is adequate for its outstanding receivables for the periods presented. In the event the allowance for doubtful accounts is insufficient for an account that is subsequently written off, additional bad debt expense would be recognized as a current period charge on the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income.
Tax Status
EastGroup, a Maryland corporation, has qualified as a real estate investment trust under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code and intends to continue to qualify as such. To maintain its status as a REIT, the Company is required to distribute at least 90% of its ordinary taxable income to its stockholders. If the Company has a capital gain, it has the option of (i) deferring recognition of the capital gain through a tax-deferred exchange, (ii) declaring and paying a capital gain dividend on any recognized net capital gain resulting in no corporate level tax, or (iii) retaining and paying corporate income tax on its net long-term capital gain, with shareholders reporting their proportional share of the undistributed long-term capital gain and receiving a credit or refund of their share of the tax paid by the Company. The Company distributed all of its
2017
,
2016
and
2015
taxable income to its stockholders. Accordingly, no significant provisions for income taxes were necessary.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
EastGroup’s
Total Assets
were
$1,953,221,000
at
December 31, 2017
,
an increase
of
$127,457,000
from
December 31, 2016
.
Total Liabilities
increased
$18,193,000
to
$1,202,091,000
, and
Total Equity
increased
$109,264,000
to
$751,130,000
during the same period. The following paragraphs explain these changes in detail.
Assets
Real Estate Properties
Real estate properties
increased
$
222,386,000
during the year ended
December 31, 2017
, primarily due to the transfer of
12
properties from
Development
, as detailed under
Development
below; the purchase of the operating properties detailed below; and
19
capital improvements at the Company's properties. These increases were partially offset by the operating property sales discussed below.
During 2017, EastGroup acquired the following operating properties:
REAL ESTATE OPERATING PROPERTIES ACQUIRED IN 2017
Location
Size
Date
Acquired
Cost
(1)
(Square feet)
(In thousands)
Shiloh 400
Atlanta, GA
238,000
02/07/2017
$
18,712
Broadmoor Commerce Park
Atlanta, GA
84,000
04/26/2017
5,363
Southpark Corporate Center 5-7
Austin, TX
99,000
05/12/2017
9,590
Hurricane Shoals 1 & 2
Atlanta, GA
260,000
12/12/2017
17,874
Total Acquisitions
681,000
$
51,539
(1)
Total cost of the operating properties acquired was $54,879,000, of which
$51,539,000
was allocated to Real estate properties as indicated above. The Company allocated $9,984,000 of the total purchase price to land using third party land valuations for the Atlanta and Austin markets. The market values are considered to be Level 3 inputs as defined by ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement (see Note 18 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on ASC 820). Intangibles associated with the purchases of real estate were allocated as follows: $3,610,000 to in-place lease intangibles and $115,000 to above market leases (both included in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets), and $385,000 to below market leases (included in Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets).
During the year ended
December 31, 2017
, the Company made capital improvements of
$27,471,000
on existing and acquired properties (included in the Capital Expenditures table under
Results of Operations
). Also, the Company incurred costs of
$12,811,000
on development projects subsequent to transfer to
Real estate properties
; the Company records these expenditures as development costs on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
EastGroup sold the following operating properties during 2017: Stemmons Circle in Dallas and Techway Southwest I-IV in Houston. The properties (514,000 square feet combined) were sold for $38.0 million and the Company recognized gains on the sales of $21.9 million.
Development
EastGroup’s investment in development at
December 31, 2017
consisted of properties in lease-up and under construction of
$130,505,000
and prospective development (primarily land) of
$111,509,000
. The Company’s total investment in development at
December 31, 2017
was
$242,014,000
compared to
$293,908,000
at
December 31, 2016
. Total capital invested for development during
2017
was
$124,938,000
, which primarily consisted of costs of
$93,395,000
and
$14,819,000
as detailed in the development activity table below and costs of
$12,811,000
on development projects subsequent to transfer to
Real estate properties
. The capitalized costs incurred on development projects subsequent to transfer to
Real estate properties
include capital improvements at the properties and do not include other capitalized costs associated with development (i.e., interest expense, property taxes and internal personnel costs).
EastGroup capitalized internal development costs of
$4,754,000
during the year ended
December 31, 2017
, compared to
$3,789,000
during
2016
.
During 2017, the Company acquired Progress Center 1 & 2, a development-stage operating property containing 132,000 square feet, in Atlanta for $10,364,000, of which
$10,312,000
was allocated to
Development
. The Company allocated $1,297,000 of the total purchase price to land using third party land valuations for the Atlanta market. Intangibles associated with the purchase of real estate were allocated as follows: $52,000 to in-place lease intangibles (included in
Other assets
on the Consolidated Balance Sheets). These costs are amortized over the remaining lives of the associated leases in place at the time of acquisition. Costs associated with the development-stage operating property acquisitions, except for the amounts allocated to in-place lease intangibles, are included in the development activity table below.
During
2017
, EastGroup purchased
88
acres of development land in San Antonio, Austin, Atlanta and Charlotte for
$12,226,000
. Costs associated with these acquisitions are included in the development activity table. These increases were offset by the sale of 19 acres of land for $3,778,000 and the transfer of
12
development projects to
Real estate properties
during
2017
with a total investment of
$160,108,000
as of the date of transfer.
20
DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Costs Incurred
Costs
Transferred
in 2017
(1)
For the
Year Ended
12/31/17
Cumulative
as of
12/31/17
Estimated
Total Costs
(2)
Anticipated Building Conversion Date
(In thousands)
LEASE-UP
Building Size (Square feet)
Alamo Ridge IV, San Antonio, TX
97,000
$
—
2,152
7,097
8,300
03/18
Weston, Ft. Lauderdale, FL
(3)
134,000
—
1,239
15,520
16,000
03/18
Oak Creek VII, Tampa, FL
116,000
2,153
3,978
6,131
7,500
04/18
Progress Center 1 & 2, Atlanta, GA
(4)
132,000
—
10,333
10,333
11,100
04/18
Eisenhauer Point 3, San Antonio, TX
71,000
—
3,411
6,159
6,800
06/18
SunCoast 4, Ft. Myers, FL
93,000
—
2,865
9,120
10,000
06/18
Steele Creek VII, Charlotte, NC
120,000
2,393
5,404
7,797
8,600
09/18
Horizon XII, Orlando, FL
140,000
3,825
7,405
11,230
12,100
12/18
Total Lease-Up
903,000
8,371
36,787
73,387
80,400
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Country Club V, Tucson, AZ
300,000
—
10,656
13,951
24,200
04/18
Kyrene 202 III, IV & V, Phoenix, AZ
166,000
2,280
9,263
11,543
13,800
02/19
CreekView 121 3 & 4, Dallas, TX
158,000
3,701
6,610
10,311
14,200
03/19
Eisenhauer Point 5, San Antonio, TX
98,000
1,253
4,551
5,804
7,500
03/19
Eisenhauer Point 6, San Antonio, TX
85,000
878
3,172
4,050
5,200
03/19
Horizon X, Orlando, FL
104,000
2,101
1,449
3,550
8,000
04/19
Falcon Field, Phoenix, AZ
96,000
1,733
1,214
2,947
9,000
05/19
Airport Commerce Center 3, Charlotte, NC
96,000
1,653
80
1,733
7,300
07/19
Settlers Crossing 1, Austin, TX
77,000
1,494
62
1,556
7,400
10/19
Settlers Crossing 2, Austin, TX
83,000
1,606
67
1,673
8,000
10/19
Total Under Construction
1,263,000
16,699
37,124
57,118
104,600
PROSPECTIVE DEVELOPMENT (PRIMARILY LAND)
Estimated Building Size (Square feet)
Phoenix, AZ
—
(4,013
)
120
—
Tucson, AZ
(5)
—
—
(417
)
—
Ft. Myers, FL
570,000
—
469
14,112
Miami, FL
850,000
—
3,632
30,876
Orlando, FL
418,000
(5,926
)
917
11,120
Tampa, FL
32,000
(2,153
)
32
1,560
Atlanta, GA
196,000
—
1,207
1,207
Jackson, MS
28,000
—
—
706
Charlotte, NC
655,000
(4,046
)
1,472
6,729
Austin, TX
180,000
(3,100
)
6,120
3,020
Dallas, TX
491,000
(3,701
)
975
9,596
El Paso, TX
(6)
—
—
(2,444
)
—
Houston, TX
(7)
1,476,000
—
(184
)
21,190
San Antonio, TX
965,000
(2,131
)
7,585
11,393
Total Prospective Development
5,861,000
(25,070
)
19,484
111,509
8,027,000
$
—
93,395
242,014
COMPLETED DEVELOPMENT AND TRANSFERRED TO REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES DURING 2017
Building Size (Square feet)
Building Conversion Date
Eisenhauer Point 1 & 2, San Antonio, TX
201,000
$
—
19
15,795
01/17
South 35th Avenue, Phoenix, AZ
(8)
125,000
—
—
1,664
01/17
Alamo Ridge III, San Antonio, TX
135,000
—
28
10,587
02/17
Parc North 1-4, Dallas, TX
(9)
446,000
—
132
32,252
02/17
Madison IV & V, Tampa, FL
145,000
—
549
8,074
03/17
Jones Corporate Park, Las Vegas, NV
(10)
416,000
—
275
39,815
04/17
Steele Creek VI, Charlotte, NC
137,000
—
519
7,525
04/17
Ten Sky Harbor, Phoenix, AZ
64,000
—
100
5,365
04/17
Horizon V, Orlando, FL
141,000
—
4,814
9,249
05/17
Horizon VII, Orlando, FL
109,000
—
1,375
8,266
06/17
Eisenhauer Point 4, San Antonio, TX
85,000
—
2,544
5,197
07/17
CreekView 121 1 & 2, Dallas, TX
193,000
—
4,464
16,319
08/17
Total Transferred to Real Estate Properties
2,197,000
$
—
14,819
160,108
(11)
Footnotes for the Development Activity table are on the following page.
21
(1)
Represents costs transferred from Prospective Development (primarily land) to Under Construction during the period. Negative amounts represent land inventory costs transferred to Under Construction.
(2)
Included in these costs are development obligations of
$29.0 million
and tenant improvement obligations of
$5.8 million
on properties under development.
(3)
This project was acquired by EastGroup on 11/1/16 and underwent redevelopment.
(4)
This project was acquired by EastGroup on 12/12/17 during the lease-up phase.
(5)
Negative amount represents land inventory costs transferred to Real Estate Properties for storage yard and parking lot expansion.
(6)
Negative amount represents land sold on 11/3/17.
(7)
Negative amount represents West Road retention ponds and infrastructure conveyed to West Harris County Municipal Utility District.
(8)
This property was redeveloped from a manufacturing building to a multi-tenant distribution building.
(9)
This project was acquired by EastGroup on 7/8/16 during the lease-up phase.
(10)
This project was acquired by EastGroup on 11/15/16 during the lease-up phase.
(11)
Represents cumulative costs at the date of transfer.
Accumulated Depreciation
Accumulated depreciation on real estate and development properties
increased
$55,351,000
during
2017
due primarily to depreciation expense of
$69,010,000
, offset by the sale of
514,000
square feet of operating properties during the period.
Other Assets
Other assets
increased
$12,474,000
during
2017
. A summary of
Other assets
follows:
December 31,
2017
2016
(In thousands)
Leasing costs (principally commissions)
$
72,722
65,521
Accumulated amortization of leasing costs
(27,973
)
(26,340
)
Leasing costs (principally commissions), net of accumulated amortization
44,749
39,181
Straight-line rents receivable
31,609
28,369
Allowance for doubtful accounts on straight-line rents receivable
(48
)
(76
)
Straight-line rents receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
31,561
28,293
Accounts receivable
6,004
6,824
Allowance for doubtful accounts on accounts receivable
(577
)
(809
)
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
5,427
6,015
Acquired in-place lease intangibles
20,690
21,231
Accumulated amortization of acquired in-place lease intangibles
(8,974
)
(8,642
)
Acquired in-place lease intangibles, net of accumulated amortization
11,716
12,589
Acquired above market lease intangibles
1,550
1,594
Accumulated amortization of acquired above market lease intangibles
(794
)
(736
)
Acquired above market lease intangibles, net of accumulated amortization
756
858
Mortgage loans receivable
4,581
4,752
Interest rate swap assets
6,034
4,546
Goodwill
990
990
Prepaid expenses and other assets
11,490
7,606
Total
Other assets
$
117,304
104,830
22
Liabilities
Unsecured bank credit facilities
increased
$4,719,000
during
2017
, mainly due to proceeds of
$391,617,000
exceeding repayments of
$387,298,000
and the amortization of debt issuance costs during the period. The Company’s credit facilities are described in greater detail under
Liquidity and Capital Resources
.
Unsecured debt
increased
$60,223,000
during
2017
, primarily due to the closing of $60 million of senior unsecured private placement notes in December 2017, and the amortization of debt issuance costs.
Secured debt
decreased
$57,993,000
during the year ended
December 31, 2017
. The decrease primarily resulted from the repayment of one mortgage loan with a balance of
$45,069,000
, regularly scheduled principal payments of
$13,139,000
and amortization of premiums on
Secured debt
, offset by the amortization of debt issuance costs during the period.
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
increased
$12,266,000
during
2017
. A summary of the Company’s
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
follows:
December 31,
2017
2016
(In thousands)
Property taxes payable
$
12,081
14,186
Development costs payable
9,699
9,844
Real estate improvements and capitalized leasing costs payable
3,957
2,304
Interest payable
3,744
3,822
Dividends payable on unvested restricted stock
1,365
1,530
Book overdraft
(1)
20,902
14,452
Other payables and accrued expenses
13,219
6,563
Total
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
$
64,967
52,701
(1)
Represents unfunded outstanding checks for which the bank has not advanced cash to the Company. See Note 1(p)
in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Other liabilities
decreased
$1,022,000
during
2017
. A summary of the Company’s
Other liabilities
follows:
December 31,
2017
2016
(In thousands)
Security deposits
$
16,668
14,782
Prepaid rent and other deferred income
9,352
9,795
Acquired below market lease intangibles
4,135
4,012
Accumulated amortization of acquired below market lease intangibles
(2,147
)
(1,662
)
Acquired below market lease intangibles, net of accumulated amortization
1,988
2,350
Interest rate swap liabilities
695
2,578
Prepaid tenant improvement reimbursements
124
343
Other liabilities
15
16
Total
Other liabilities
$
28,842
29,864
Equity
Additional paid-in capital
increased
$111,835,000
during
2017
primarily due to the issuance of common stock under the Company's continuous common equity program (as discussed in
Liquidity and Capital Resources)
and stock-based compensation (as discussed in Note 11 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). EastGroup issued
1,370,457
shares of common stock under its continuous common equity program with net proceeds to the Company of
$109,207,000
.
23
During
2017
,
Distributions in excess of earnings
increased
$3,377,000
as a result of dividends on common stock of
$86,560,000
exceeding
Net Income Attributable to EastGroup Properties, Inc. Common Stockholders
of
$83,183,000
.
Accumulated other comprehensive income
increased
$3,353,000
during
2017
. The increase resulted from the change in fair value of the Company's interest rate swaps (cash flow hedges) which are further discussed in Notes 12 and 13 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
2017
Compared to
2016
Net Income Attributable to EastGroup Properties, Inc. Common Stockholders
for
2017
was
$83,183,000
(
$2.45
per basic and
$2.44
per diluted share) compared to
$95,509,000
(
$2.93
per basic and diluted share) for
2016
. PNOI increased by $15,490,000 ($.45 per diluted share) for 2017 as compared to 2016. EastGroup recognized net gains on sales of real estate investments and non-operating real estate of $22,148,000 ($.65 per diluted share) compared to $42,903,000 ($1.31 per diluted share) during 2016. In addition,
Depreciation and amortization
expense increased by $5,939,000 ($.17 per diluted share), and
General and administrative
expense increased by $1,740,000 ($.05 per share) during 2017 compared to 2016.
PNOI increased by $15,490,000, or 8.7%, for
2017
compared to
2016
. PNOI increased $10,327,000 from newly developed and redeveloped properties, $4,765,000 from same property operations and $3,355,000 from
2016
and
2017
acquisitions; PNOI decreased $2,767,000 from operating properties sold in 2016 and 2017. For the year
2017
, lease termination fee income was $468,000 compared to $812,000 for
2016
. The Company recorded net bad debt expense of $499,000 in
2017
and $992,000 in
2016
. Straight-lining of rent increased
Income from real estate operations
by $3,723,000 and $2,839,000 in
2017
and
2016
, respectively.
The Company signed 138 leases with certain free rent concessions on 3,919,000 square feet during
2017
with total free rent concessions of $5,672,000 over the lives of the leases, compared to 143 leases with free rent concessions on 4,176,000 square feet with total free rent concessions of $5,286,000 over the lives of the leases in
2016
.
The Company’s percentage of leased square footage was 97.0% at December 31,
2017
, compared to 97.3% at December 31,
2016
. Occupancy at the end of
2017
was 96.4% compared to 96.8% at the end of
2016
.
Same property average occupancy represents the average month-end percentage of leased square footage for which the lease term has commenced as compared to the total leasable square footage for the same operating properties owned during the entire current period and prior year reporting period. Same property average occupancy for the year ended
December 31, 2017
, was 96.8% compared to 96.5% for
2016
.
The same property average rental rate calculated in accordance with GAAP represents the average annual rental rates of leases in place for the same operating properties owned during the entire current period and prior year reporting period. The same property average rental rate was $5.79 per square foot for the year ended
December 31, 2017
, compared to $5.57 per square foot for
2016
.
24
Interest Expense
decreased
$438,000
for
2017
compared to
2016
. The following table presents the components of
Interest Expense
for
2017
and
2016
:
Years Ended December 31,
2017
2016
Increase (Decrease)
(In thousands)
VARIABLE RATE INTEREST EXPENSE
Unsecured bank credit facilities interest - variable rate
(excluding amortization of facility fees and debt issuance costs)
$
2,379
1,583
796
Amortization of facility fees - unsecured bank credit facilities
670
670
—
Amortization of debt issuance costs - unsecured bank credit facilities
451
450
1
Total variable rate interest expense
3,500
2,703
797
FIXED RATE INTEREST EXPENSE
Unsecured bank credit facilities interest - fixed rate
(1)
(excluding amortization of facility fees and debt issuance costs)
1,616
614
1,002
Unsecured debt interest
(1)
(excluding amortization of debt issuance costs)
22,425
19,245
3,180
Secured debt interest
(excluding amortization of debt issuance costs)
12,201
16,907
(4,706
)
Amortization of debt issuance costs - unsecured debt
479
700
(221
)
Amortization of debt issuance costs - secured debt
319
384
(65
)
Total fixed rate interest expense
37,040
37,850
(810
)
Total interest
40,540
40,553
(13
)
Less capitalized interest
(5,765
)
(5,340
)
(425
)
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE
$
34,775
35,213
(438
)
(1)
Includes interest on the Company's unsecured bank credit facilities and unsecured debt with fixed interest rates per the debt agreements or effectively fixed interest rates due to interest rate swaps, as discussed in Note 13 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
EastGroup's variable rate interest expense increased by
$797,000
for
2017
as compared to
2016
primarily due to increases in the Company's weighted average interest rate and average borrowings on its unsecured bank credit facilities as shown in the following table:
Years Ended December 31,
2017
2016
Increase
(Decrease)
(In thousands, except rates of interest)
Average borrowings on unsecured bank credit facilities - variable rate
$
114,751
106,352
8,399
Weighted average variable interest rates
(excluding amortization of facility fees and debt issuance costs)
2.07
%
1.49
%
The Company's fixed rate interest expense decreased by
$810,000
for
2017
as compared to
2016
as a result of the secured debt, fixed rate unsecured bank credit facilities and unsecured debt activity described below.
Secured debt interest decreased by $4,706,000 in 2017 as compared to 2016 as a result of regularly scheduled principal payments and debt repayments. Regularly scheduled principal payments on secured debt were $13,139,000 during
2017
and $17,037,000 in
2016
. The details of the secured debt repaid in
2016
and
2017
are shown in the following table:
25
SECURED DEBT REPAID IN 2016 AND 2017
Interest Rate
Date Repaid
Payoff Amount
(In thousands)
Huntwood and Wiegman I
5.68%
08/05/2016
$
24,543
Alamo Downs, Arion 1-15 & 17, Rampart I-IV, Santan 10 I and
World Houston 16
5.97%
09/06/2016
51,194
Weighted Average/Total Amount for 2016
5.88%
$
75,737
Arion 16, Broadway VI, Chino, East University I & II, Northpark I-IV, Santan 10 II, 55
th
Avenue and World Houston 1 & 2, 21 & 23
5.57%
08/07/2017
$
45,069
Weighted Average/Total Amount for 2016 and 2017
5.76%
$
120,806
EastGroup did not obtain any new secured debt during 2016 or 2017.
The decrease in secured debt interest expense was partially offset by increases in interest expense from fixed rate unsecured bank credit facilities and unsecured debt. The Company's interest expense from fixed rate unsecured bank credit facilities increased by $1,002,000 during 2017 as compared to
2016
. In August 2016, EastGroup repaid (with no penalty) an $80 million unsecured term loan with an effectively fixed interest rate of 2.770% and an original maturity date of August 15, 2018. On the same day, the Company borrowed $80 million through its $300 million unsecured bank credit facility; the maturity date for the credit facility is July 30, 2019. The Company re-designated the interest rate swap that was previously applied to the $80 million unsecured term loan to the $80 million unsecured bank credit facility borrowing. The $80 million unsecured bank credit facility draw has an effectively fixed interest rate of 2.020% through the interest rate swap's maturity date of August 15, 2018.
The Company's interest expense from unsecured debt increased by $3,180,000 during 2017 as compared to 2016 as a result of the Company's unsecured debt activity described below. The details of the unsecured debt obtained in 2016 and 2017 are shown in the following table:
NEW UNSECURED DEBT IN 2016 and 2017
Effective Interest Rate
Date Obtained
Maturity Date
Amount
(In thousands)
$65 Million Unsecured Term Loan
(1)
2.863%
04/01/2016
04/01/2023
$
65,000
$40 Million Unsecured Term Loan
(2)
2.335%
07/29/2016
07/30/2021
40,000
$60 Million Senior Unsecured Notes
3.480%
12/15/2016
12/15/2024
60,000
$40 Million Senior Unsecured Notes
3.750%
12/15/2016
12/15/2026
40,000
Weighted Average/Total Amount for 2016
3.114%
$
205,000
$60 Million Senior Unsecured Notes
3.460%
12/13/2017
12/13/2024
$
60,000
Weighted Average/Total Amount for 2016 and 2017
3.192%
$
265,000
(1)
The interest rate on this unsecured term loan is comprised of LIBOR plus 165 basis points subject to a pricing grid for changes in the Company's coverage ratings. The Company entered into an interest rate swap to convert the loan's LIBOR rate to a fixed interest rate, providing the Company a weighted average effective interest rate on the term loan of 2.863% as of
December 31, 2017
. See Note 13 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the interest rate swaps.
(2)
The interest rate on this unsecured term loan is comprised of LIBOR plus 110 basis points subject to a pricing grid for changes in the Company's coverage ratings. The Company entered into an interest rate swap to convert the loan's LIBOR rate to a fixed interest rate, providing the Company a weighted average effective interest rate on the term loan of 2.335% as of
December 31, 2017
. See Note 13 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the interest rate swaps.
Additionally, in December 2017, the Company refinanced a $75 million unsecured term loan, resulting in a 30 basis point reduction in the loan's interest rate. The loan, which has a maturity date of December 20, 2020, now has an effectively fixed interest rate of 3.452%.
Interest costs during the period of construction of real estate properties are capitalized and offset against interest expense. Capitalized interest increased by $425,000 for
2017
as compared to
2016
.
Depreciation and amortization
expense increased $5,939,000 for
2017
compared to
2016
primarily due to the operating properties acquired by the Company during 2016 and 2017 and the properties transferred from
Development
in 2016 and 2017, partially offset by operating properties sold in 2016 and 2017.
26
Gain, net of loss, on sales of real estate investments,
which includes gains and losses on the sales of operating properties, decreased $20,315,000 for 2017 as compared to 2016. Gain, net of loss, on sales of non-operating real estate (included in
Other
on the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income) decreased $440,000 for 2017 as compared to 2016. The Company's 2016 and 2017 sales transactions are described below in
Real Estate Sold and Held for Sale/Discontinued Operations.
Real Estate Improvements
Real estate improvements for EastGroup’s operating properties for the years ended December 31,
2017
and
2016
were as follows:
Estimated
Useful Life
Years Ended December 31,
2017
2016
(In thousands)
Upgrade on Acquisitions
40 yrs
$
161
394
Tenant Improvements:
New Tenants
Lease Life
11,413
9,976
Renewal Tenants
Lease Life
3,357
2,748
Other:
Building Improvements
5-40 yrs
3,362
5,113
Roofs
5-15 yrs
6,197
2,785
Parking Lots
3-5 yrs
1,880
1,377
Other
5 yrs
1,101
764
Total Real Estate Improvements
(1)
$
27,471
23,157
(1)
Reconciliation of Total Real Estate Improvements to Real Estate Improvements on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:
Years Ended December 31,
2017
2016
(In thousands)
Total Real Estate Improvements
$
27,471
23,157
Change in Real Estate Property Payables
(1,313
)
621
Real Estate Improvements on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
$
26,158
23,778
Capitalized Leasing Costs
The Company’s leasing costs (principally commissions) are capitalized and included in
Other assets
. The costs are amortized over the terms of the associated leases and are included in
Depreciation and amortization
expense. Capitalized leasing costs for the years ended December 31,
2017
and
2016
were as follows:
Estimated
Useful Life
Years Ended December 31,
2017
2016
(In thousands)
Development
Lease Life
$
5,571
4,217
New Tenants
Lease Life
5,782
5,273
Renewal Tenants
Lease Life
4,907
4,978
Total Capitalized Leasing Costs
$
16,260
14,468
Amortization of Leasing Costs
$
10,329
9,932
Real Estate Sold and Held for Sale/Discontinued Operations
The Company considers a real estate property to be held for sale when it meets the criteria established under ASC 360,
Property, Plant and Equipment,
including when it is probable that the property will be sold within a year. Real estate properties held for sale are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less estimated costs to sell and are not depreciated while they are held for sale.
In accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-08,
Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360), Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity,
the Company would report a disposal of a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity in discontinued
27
operations if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity's operations and financial results when the component or group of components meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale or when the component or group of components is disposed of by sale or other than by sale. In addition, the Company would provide additional disclosures about both discontinued operations and the disposal of an individually significant component of an entity that does not qualify for discontinued operations presentation in the financial statements. EastGroup performs an analysis of properties sold to determine whether the sales qualify for discontinued operations presentation.
The Company did not classify any properties as held for sale as of December 31,
2017
and
2016
.
The Company does not consider its sales in 2016 and 2017 to be disposals of a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity representing a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on the entity's operations and financial results.
In 2017, Eastgroup sold Stemmons Circle and Techway Southwest I-IV. The properties, which contain 514,000 square feet and are located in Houston and Dallas, were sold for $38.0 million and the Company recognized net gains on the sales of $21.9 million. The Company also sold 19 acres of land in El Paso and Dallas for $3,778,000 and recognized net gains of $293,000.
During 2016, EastGroup sold the following operating properties: Northwest Point Distribution and Service Centers, North Stemmons II and III, America Plaza, Lockwood Distribution Center, West Loop Distribution Center 1 & 2, two of its four Interstate Commons Distribution Center buildings, Castilian Research Center and Memphis I. The properties, which contain 1,256,000 square feet and are located in Houston, Dallas, Phoenix, Santa Barbara and Memphis, were sold for $75.7 million and the Company recognized net gains on the sales of $42.2 million. The Company also sold 25 acres of land in Dallas, Orlando and Houston for $5.4 million and recognized net gains on sales of $733,000.
The gains and losses on the sales of land are included in
Other
on the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income, and the gains and losses on the sales of operating properties are included in
Gain, net of loss, on sales of real estate investments
. See Notes 1(f) and 2 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information related to discontinued operations and gains and losses on sales of real estate investments.
2016
Compared to
2015
Net Income Attributable to EastGroup Properties, Inc. Common Stockholders
for
2016
was
$95,509,000
(
$2.93
per basic and diluted share) compared to
$47,866,000
(
$1.49
per basic and diluted share) for
2015
. EastGroup recognized
Gain, net of loss, on sales of real estate investments
of
$42,170,000
during
2016
and
$2,903,000
during
2015
.
PNOI increased by $11,190,000, or 6.7%, for
2016
compared to
2015
. PNOI increased $7,345,000 from newly developed and redeveloped properties, $4,943,000 from same property operations and $2,488,000 from
2015
and
2016
acquisitions; PNOI decreased $3,447,000 from properties sold in 2015 and 2016. For the year
2016
, lease termination fee income was $812,000 compared to $225,000 for
2015
. The Company recorded net bad debt expense of $992,000 in
2016
and $747,000 in
2015
. Straight-lining of rent increased
Income from real estate operations
by $2,839,000 and $1,889,000 in
2016
and
2015
, respectively.
The Company signed 143 leases with certain free rent concessions on 4,176,000 square feet during
2016
with total free rent concessions of $5,286,000 over the lives of the leases, compared to 164 leases with free rent concessions on 3,678,000 square feet with total free rent concessions of $4,024,000 over the lives of the leases in
2015
.
The Company’s percentage of leased square footage was 97.3% at December 31,
2016
, compared to 97.2% at December 31,
2015
. Occupancy at the end of
2016
was 96.8% compared to 96.1% at the end of
2015
.
Same property average occupancy for the year ended December 31,
2016
, was 96.4% compared to 96.1% for
2015
. The same property average rental rate was $5.61 per square foot for the year ended December 31,
2016
, compared to $5.26 per square foot for
2015
.
28
Interest expense
increased
$547,000
in
2016
compared to
2015
. The following table presents the components of
Interest expense
for
2016
and
2015
:
Years Ended December 31,
2016
2015
Increase (Decrease)
(In thousands)
VARIABLE RATE INTEREST EXPENSE
Unsecured bank credit facilities interest - variable rate
(excluding amortization of facility fees and debt issuance costs)
$
1,583
1,420
163
Amortization of facility fees - unsecured bank credit facilities
670
608
62
Amortization of debt issuance costs - unsecured bank credit facilities
450
493
(43
)
Total variable rate interest expense
2,703
2,521
182
FIXED RATE INTEREST EXPENSE
Unsecured bank credit facilities interest - fixed rate
(1)
(excluding amortization of facility fees and debt issuance costs)
614
—
614
Unsecured debt interest
(1)
(excluding amortization of debt issuance costs)
19,245
15,498
3,747
Secured debt interest
(excluding amortization of debt issuance costs)
16,907
21,061
(4,154
)
Amortization of debt issuance costs - unsecured debt
700
422
278
Amortization of debt issuance costs - secured debt
384
421
(37
)
Total fixed rate interest expense
37,850
37,402
448
Total interest
40,553
39,923
630
Less capitalized interest
(5,340
)
(5,257
)
(83
)
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE
$
35,213
34,666
547
(1)
Includes interest on the Company's unsecured bank credit facilities and unsecured debt with fixed interest rates per the debt agreements or effectively fixed interest rates due to interest rate swaps, as discussed in Note 13 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Company's fixed rate interest expense increased by $448,000 for
2016
as compared to
2015
as a result of the fixed rate unsecured bank credit facilities, unsecured debt and secured debt activity described below.
EastGroup's unsecured debt interest increased by $3,747,000 in 2016 as compared to 2015 as a result of the unsecured debt activity described below. The details of the new unsecured debt in
2015
and
2016
are shown in the following table:
NEW UNSECURED DEBT IN 2015 and 2016
Effective Interest Rate
Date Obtained
Maturity Date
Amount
(In thousands)
$75 Million Unsecured Term Loan
(1)
3.031%
03/02/2015
02/28/2022
$
75,000
$25 Million Senior Unsecured Notes
3.970%
10/01/2015
10/01/2025
25,000
$50 Million Senior Unsecured Notes
3.990%
10/07/2015
10/07/2025
50,000
Weighted Average/Total Amount for 2015
3.507%
$
150,000
$65 Million Unsecured Term Loan
(2)
2.863%
04/01/2016
04/01/2023
$
65,000
$40 Million Unsecured Term Loan
(3)
2.335%
07/29/2016
07/30/2021
40,000
$60 Million Senior Unsecured Notes
3.480%
12/15/2016
12/15/2024
60,000
$40 Million Senior Unsecured Notes
3.750%
12/15/2016
12/15/2026
40,000
Weighted Average/Total Amount for 2016
3.114%
$
205,000
Weighted Average/Total Amount for 2015 and 2016
3.280%
$
355,000
(1)
The interest rate on this unsecured term loan is comprised of LIBOR plus 140 basis points subject to a pricing grid for changes in the Company's coverage ratings. The Company entered into an interest rate swap to convert the loan's LIBOR rate to a fixed interest rate, providing the Company a weighted average effective interest rate on the term loan of 3.031% as of
December 31, 2016
. See Note 13 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the interest rate swaps.
(2)
The interest rate on this unsecured term loan is comprised of LIBOR plus 165 basis points subject to a pricing grid for changes in the Company's coverage ratings. The Company entered into an interest rate swap to convert the loan's LIBOR rate to a fixed interest rate, providing the Company a weighted average effective interest rate on the term loan of 2.863% as of
December 31, 2016
. See Note 13 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the interest rate swaps.
(3)
The interest rate on this unsecured term loan is comprised of LIBOR plus 110 basis points subject to a pricing grid for changes in the Company's coverage ratings. The Company entered into an interest rate swap to convert the loan's LIBOR rate to a fixed interest rate, providing the Company a weighted average effective interest rate on the term loan of 2.335% as of
December 31, 2016
. See Note 13 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the interest rate swaps.
29
In August 2016, EastGroup repaid (with no penalty) an $80 million unsecured term loan with an effectively fixed interest rate of 2.770% and an original maturity date of August 15, 2018. On the same day, the Company borrowed $80 million through its $300 million unsecured bank credit facility; the maturity date for the credit facility is July 30, 2019. The Company re-designated the interest rate swap that was previously applied to the $80 million unsecured term loan to the $80 million unsecured bank credit facility borrowing. The $80 million unsecured bank credit facility draw has an effectively fixed interest rate of 2.020% through the interest rate swap's maturity date of August 15, 2018.
Secured debt interest decreased by $4,154,000 in
2016
as compared to
2015
as a result of regularly scheduled principal payments and debt repayments. Regularly scheduled principal payments on secured debt were $17,037,000 during
2016
and $20,484,000 in
2015
. The details of the secured debt repaid in
2015
and
2016
are shown in the following table:
SECURED DEBT REPAID IN 2015 AND 2016
Interest Rate
Date Repaid
Payoff Amount
(In thousands)
Beltway II-IV, Commerce Park I, Eastlake, Fairgrounds, Nations Ford,
Techway Southwest III, Wetmore 1-4 and World Houston 15 & 22
5.50%
03/06/2015
$
57,450
Country Club I, Lake Pointe, Techway Southwest II and
World Houston 19 & 20
4.98%
11/06/2015
24,403
Weighted Average/Total Amount for 2015
5.34%
$
81,853
Huntwood and Wiegman I
5.68%
08/05/2016
$
24,543
Alamo Downs, Arion 1-15 & 17, Rampart I-IV, Santan 10 I and
World Houston 16
5.97%
09/06/2016
51,194
Weighted Average/Total Amount for 2016
5.88%
$
75,737
Weighted Average/Total Amount for 2015 and 2016
5.60%
$
157,590
EastGroup did not obtain any new secured debt during 2015 and 2016.
EastGroup's variable rate interest expense increased by $182,000 for
2016
as compared to
2015
primarily due to an increase in the Company's weighted average interest rate on unsecured bank credit facilities borrowings, offset by a decrease in average unsecured bank credit facilities borrowings as shown in the following table:
Years Ended December 31,
2016
2015
Increase
(Decrease)
(In thousands, except rates of interest)
Average borrowings on unsecured bank credit facilities - variable rate
$
106,352
109,777
(3,425
)
Weighted average variable interest rates
(excluding amortization of facility fees and debt issuance costs)
1.49
%
1.29
%
Interest costs during the period of construction of real estate properties are capitalized and offset against interest expense. Capitalized interest increased $83,000 for
2016
as compared to
2015
.
Depreciation and amortization
expense increased $4,645,000 for
2016
compared to
2015
primarily due to the operating properties acquired by the Company in 2015 and 2016 and the properties transferred from
Development
in 2015 and 2016, partially offset by operating properties sold in 2015 and 2016.
Gain, net of loss, on sales of real estate investments,
which includes gains on the sales of operating properties, increased $39,267,000 for 2016 as compared to 2015. Gain, net of loss, on sales of non-operating real estate (included in
Other
on the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income) increased $610,000 for 2016 as compared to 2015. The Company's 2015 and 2016 sales transactions are described below in
Real Estate Sold and Held for Sale/Discontinued Operations.
30
Real Estate Improvements
Real Estate Improvements for EastGroup’s operating properties for the years ended December 31,
2016
and
2015
were as follows:
Estimated
Useful Life
Years Ended December 31,
2016
2015
(In thousands)
Upgrade on Acquisitions
40 yrs
$
394
5
Tenant Improvements:
New Tenants
Lease Life
9,976
10,100
Renewal Tenants
Lease Life
2,748
1,936
Other:
Building Improvements
5-40 yrs
5,113
4,599
Roofs
5-15 yrs
2,785
7,562
Parking Lots
3-5 yrs
1,377
808
Other
5 yrs
764
768
Total Real Estate Improvements
(1)
$
23,157
25,778
(1)
Reconciliation of Total Real Estate Improvements to Real Estate Improvements on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:
Years Ended December 31,
2016
2015
(In thousands)
Total Real Estate Improvements
$
23,157
25,778
Change in Real Estate Property Payables
621
(716
)
Real Estate Improvements on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
$
23,778
25,062
Capitalized Leasing Costs
The Company’s leasing costs (principally commissions) are capitalized and included in
Other assets
. The costs are amortized over the terms of the associated leases and are included in
Depreciation and amortization
expense. Capitalized leasing costs for the years ended December 31,
2016
and
2015
were as follows:
Estimated
Useful Life
Years Ended December 31,
2016
2015
(In thousands)
Development
Lease Life
$
4,217
3,824
New Tenants
Lease Life
5,273
3,893
Renewal Tenants
Lease Life
4,978
3,773
Total Capitalized Leasing Costs
$
14,468
11,490
Amortization of Leasing Costs
$
9,932
9,038
Real Estate Held for Sale/Discontinued Operations
The Company did not classify any properties as held for sale as of December 31,
2016
and
2015
.
The Company does not consider its sales in 2015 and 2016 to be disposals of a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity representing a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on the entity's operations and financial results.
During 2016, EastGroup sold the following operating properties: Northwest Point Distribution and Service Centers, North Stemmons II and III, America Plaza, Lockwood Distribution Center, West Loop Distribution Center 1 & 2, two of its four Interstate Commons Distribution Center buildings, Castilian Research Center and Memphis I. The properties, which contain 1,256,000 square feet and are located in Houston, Dallas, Phoenix, Santa Barbara and Memphis, were sold for $75.7 million and the Company recognized net gains on the sales of $42.2 million. The Company also sold 25 acres of land in Dallas, Orlando and Houston for $5.4 million and recognized net gains on sales of $733,000.
31
During 2015, EastGroup sold one operating property, the last of its three Ambassador Row Warehouses in Dallas containing 185,000 square feet, for $5.3 million and recognized a gain on the sale of $2.9 million. The Company also sold a small parcel of land in New Orleans for $170,000 and recognized a gain of $123,000.
The gains and losses on the sales of land are included in
Other
on the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income, and the gains and losses on the sales of operating properties are included in
Gain, net of loss, on sales of real estate investments
. See Notes 1(f) and 2 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information related to discontinued operations and gains on sales of real estate investments.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
EastGroup has evaluated all ASUs recently released by the FASB through the date the financial statements were issued and determined that the following ASUs apply to the Company.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers,
which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The FASB issued further guidance in ASU 2016-12,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients,
that provides clarifying guidance in certain narrow areas and adds some practical expedients. ASU 2014-09 will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. The effective date of ASU 2014-09 was extended by one year by ASU 2015-14,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date.
The new standard was effective for the Company on January 1, 2018, and the Company is using the modified retrospective approach upon adoption. The Company has made significant progress in evaluating the effect of ASU 2014-09 on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures beginning with the Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2018. The Company has completed its inventory of its sources of revenue and does not believe there will be a material financial statement impact or that its pattern of revenue recognition will be materially impacted by the adoption of ASU 2014-09.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01,
Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,
which requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes, requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset, and eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized costs on the balance sheet. EastGroup adopted ASU 2016-01 effective January 1, 2018. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of ASU 2016-01 will have a material impact on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02,
Leases (Topic 842),
which requires lessees to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date: (1) a lease liability, which is a lessee's obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and (2) a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee's right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. The Company is a lessee on a limited number of leases, including office and ground leases, and while the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will impact the Company's accounting for office and ground leases, the Company anticipates the impact will not be material to its overall financial condition and results of operations. Lessor accounting is largely unchanged under ASU 2016-02. The Company's primary revenue is rental income; as such, the Company is a lessor on a significant number of leases. The Company is continuing to evaluate the potential impacts of the ASU and believes it will continue to account for its leases in substantially the same manner. The most significant changes for the Company related to lessor accounting include bifurcating its revenue into lease and non-lease components and the new standard's narrow definition of initial direct costs for leases. The new definition will result in certain costs (primarily legal costs related to lease negotiations) being expensed rather than capitalized upon adoption of the new standard. Public business entities are required to apply the amendments in ASU 2016-02 for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. EastGroup plans to adopt ASU 2016-02 effective January 1, 2019. The Company is continuing the process of evaluating and quantifying the effect that ASU 2016-02 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures beginning with the Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2019.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09,
Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting
. The ASU is intended to improve the accounting for share-based payments and affects all organizations that issue share-based payment awards to their employees. Several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment awards are simplified with the ASU, including income tax consequences, classification of awards as equity or liabilities and classification on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years; early adoption is permitted. EastGroup
32
adopted ASU 2016-09 effective January 1, 2017. As a result, the Company elected to reverse compensation cost of any forfeited awards when they occur and will continue to classify the cash flows resulting from remitting cash to the tax authorities for the payment of taxes on the vesting of share-based payment awards as a financing activity on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. In addition, upon vesting of share-based payments, the Company will withhold up to the maximum individual statutory tax rate and classify the entire award as equity. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15,
Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments,
which addresses certain cash flow issues, including how debt prepayments or debt extinguishment costs and distributions received from equity method investees are presented. ASU 2016-15 is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, and the Company has adopted ASU 2016-15 effective January 1, 2017. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01,
Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business
. The ASU is intended to provide a new framework for determining whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. Under the new guidance, companies are required to utilize an initial screening test to determine whether substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets; if so, the set is not a business. The Company has determined that some of its real estate property acquisitions may be considered to be acquisitions of groups of similar identifiable assets; therefore, the acquisitions are not considered to be acquisitions of a business. EastGroup adopted ASU 2017-01 for transactions beginning on October 1, 2016. As a result, the Company has capitalized acquisition costs related to its 2017 and fourth quarter 2016 acquisitions as they were determined not to be acquisitions of a business.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04,
Intangibles - Goodwill and Others (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment,
which simplifies the measurement of goodwill impairment by eliminating the requirement of performing a hypothetical purchase price allocation to measure goodwill impairment. The Company adopted ASU 2017-04 effective January 1, 2017, and is applying the new guidance for goodwill impairment tests with measurement dates after January 1, 2017. The adoption of ASU 2017-04 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09,
Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting,
which clarifies what constitutes a modification of a share-based payment award. The ASU is intended to provide clarity and reduce both diversity in practice and cost and complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718 to a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. ASU 2017-09 is effective for public entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted ASU 2017-09 on January 1, 2018, and it does not anticipate that the adoption of ASU 2017-09 will have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations, as the Company does not expect to have any modifications to share-based payment awards. However, if the Company does have a modification to an award in the future, it will follow the guidance in ASU 2017-09.
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12,
Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities.
The ASU is intended to better align a company's financial reporting for hedging activities with the economic objectives of those activities. The transition method is a modified retrospective approach that will require the Company to recognize the cumulative effect of initially applying the ASU as an adjustment to
Accumulated other comprehensive income
with a corresponding adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year the entity adopts the ASU. The primary provision in the ASU that will require an adjustment to beginning retained earnings is the change in timing and income statement presentation for ineffectiveness related to cash flow and net investment hedges. As a result of the transition guidance in the ASU, cumulative ineffectiveness that has previously been recognized on cash flow and net investment hedges that are still outstanding and designated as of the date of adoption will be adjusted and removed from beginning retained earnings and placed in
Accumulated other comprehensive income.
ASU 2017-12 is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted; however, the Company plans to adopt ASU 2017-12 on January 1, 2019. While the Company continues to assess all potential impacts of ASU 2017-12, it does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.
33
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Net cash provided by operating activities was
$155,014,000
for the year ended
December 31, 2017
. The primary other sources of cash were from borrowings on unsecured bank credit facilities; proceeds from common stock offerings; proceeds from unsecured debt; and net proceeds from sales of real estate investments and non-operating real estate. The Company distributed
$86,725,000
in common stock dividends during
2017
. Other primary uses of cash were for repayments on unsecured bank credit facilities and secured debt; development of properties; purchases of real estate; and capital improvements at various properties.
Total debt at
December 31, 2017
and
2016
is detailed below. The Company’s unsecured bank credit facilities and unsecured debt instruments have certain restrictive covenants, such as maintaining debt service coverage and leverage ratios and maintaining insurance coverage, and the Company was in compliance with all of its debt covenants at
December 31, 2017
and
2016
.
December 31,
2017
2016
(In thousands)
Unsecured bank credit facilities - variable rate, carrying amount
$
116,339
112,020
Unsecured bank credit facilities - fixed rate, carrying amount
(1)
80,000
80,000
Unamortized debt issuance costs
(630
)
(1,030
)
Unsecured bank credit facilities
195,709
190,990
Unsecured debt - fixed rate, carrying amount
(1)
715,000
655,000
Unamortized debt issuance costs
(1,939
)
(2,162
)
Unsecured debt
713,061
652,838
Secured debt - fixed rate, carrying amount
(1)
200,354
258,594
Unamortized debt issuance costs
(842
)
(1,089
)
Secured debt
199,512
257,505
Total debt
$
1,108,282
1,101,333
(1)
These loans have a fixed interest rate or an effectively fixed interest rate due to interest rate swaps.
EastGroup has a
$300 million
unsecured revolving credit facility with a group of
nine
banks that matures in July 2019. The credit facility contains options for a
one
-year extension (at the Company's election) and a
$150 million
expansion (with agreement by all parties). The interest rate on each tranche is usually reset on a monthly basis and as of
December 31, 2017
, was LIBOR plus
100
basis points with an annual facility fee of
20
basis points. The margin and facility fee are subject to changes in the Company's credit ratings. The Company has designated an interest rate swap to an
$80 million
unsecured bank credit facility draw that effectively fixes the interest rate on the
$80 million
draw to
2.020%
through the interest rate swap's maturity date of August 15, 2018. As of
December 31, 2017
, EastGroup had an additional
$110,000,000
of variable rate borrowings on this unsecured bank credit facility with a weighted average interest rate of
2.528%
. The Company has a standby letter of credit of
$674,000
pledged on this facility.
The Company also has a
$35 million
unsecured revolving credit facility that matures in July 2019. This credit facility automatically extends for
one
year if the extension option in the $300 million revolving credit facility is exercised. The interest rate is reset on a daily basis and as of
December 31, 2017
, was LIBOR plus
100
basis points with an annual facility fee of
20
basis points. The margin and facility fee are subject to changes in the Company's credit ratings. At
December 31, 2017
, the interest rate was
2.564%
on a balance of
$6,339,000
.
As market conditions permit, EastGroup issues equity and/or employs fixed-rate debt, including variable-rate debt that has been swapped to an effectively fixed rate through the use of interest rate swaps, to replace the short-term bank borrowings. The Company believes its current operating cash flow and unsecured bank credit facilities provide the capacity to fund the operations of the Company. The Company also believes it can obtain debt financing and issue common and/or preferred equity. For future debt issuances, the Company intends to issue primarily unsecured fixed-rate debt, including variable-rate debt that has been swapped to an effectively fixed rate through the use of interest rate swaps. The Company may also access the public debt market in the future as a means to raise capital.
34
In August 2017, EastGroup repaid (with no penalty) a mortgage loan with a balance of $45.1 million, an interest rate of 5.57% and an original maturity date of September 5, 2017. The loan was collateralized by 1.4 million square feet of operating properties.
In December 2017, the Company closed $60 million of senior unsecured private placement notes with an insurance company. The notes have a seven-year term and a fixed interest rate of 3.46% with semi-annual interest payments. The notes will not be and have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements.
Also in December, the Company refinanced a $75 million unsecured term loan, resulting in a 30 basis point reduction in the loan's interest rate. The loan, which has a maturity date of December 20, 2020, now has an effectively fixed interest rate of 3.452%. The refinancing will provide a net annual savings to the Company of approximately $170,000.
In connection with EastGroup's continuous equity program, the Company has entered into sales agency financing agreements with various sales agents under which the Company may issue and sell up to 10,000,000 shares of its common stock from time to time in "at the market" offerings as defined in Rule 415 of the Securities Act of 1933. The Company previously sold an aggregate of 3,598,660 shares of common stock under the sales agency financing agreements and, as of
February 14, 2018
, EastGroup may offer and sell an additional
6,401,340
shares of common stock through the sales agents.
During 2017, the Company issued and sold
1,370,457
shares of common stock under its continuous equity program at an average price of $80.71 per share with gross proceeds to the Company of $110,606,000. The Company incurred offering-related costs of $1,399,000 during the year, resulting in net proceeds to the Company of
$109,207,000
.
Contractual Obligations
EastGroup’s fixed, non-cancelable obligations as of
December 31, 2017
were as follows:
Payments Due by Period
Total
Less Than
1 Year
1-3 Years
3-5 Years
More Than
5 Years
(In thousands)
Unsecured Bank Credit Facilities
(1)
(2)
$
196,339
—
196,339
—
—
Interest on Unsecured Bank Credit Facilities
(3)
8,905
5,382
3,523
—
—
Unsecured Debt
(1)
715,000
50,000
180,000
115,000
370,000
Interest on Unsecured Debt
120,729
24,139
40,986
29,517
26,087
Secured Debt
(1)
200,354
11,314
64,665
122,332
2,043
Interest on Secured Debt
26,467
10,116
13,264
2,809
278
Operating Lease Obligations:
Office Leases
1,864
349
706
809
—
Ground Leases
13,534
761
1,522
1,522
9,729
Real Estate Property Obligations
(4)
2,402
2,402
—
—
—
Development Obligations
(5)
29,024
29,024
—
—
—
Tenant Improvements
(6)
13,231
13,231
—
—
—
Purchase Obligations
3,368
3,206
162
—
—
Total
$
1,331,217
149,924
501,167
271,989
408,137
(1)
These amounts are included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets net of unamortized debt issuance costs.
(2)
The Company’s balances under its unsecured bank credit facilities change depending on the Company’s cash needs and, as such, both the principal amounts and the interest rates are subject to variability. At
December 31, 2017
, the weighted average interest rate was 2.530% on the $116,339,000 of variable-rate debt that matures in July 2019. Unsecured bank credit facilities also included $80,000,000 of debt with an effectively fixed interest rate of 2.020% due to an interest rate swap that matures on August 15, 2018. The $300 million unsecured credit facility has options for a one-year extension (at the Company's election) and a $150 million expansion (with agreement by all parties). The $35 million unsecured credit facility automatically extends for one year if the extension option in the $300 million revolving facility is exercised. As of
December 31, 2017
, the interest rate on the $300 million facility was LIBOR plus 100 basis points (weighted average interest rate of 2.528%) with an annual facility fee of 20 basis points, and the interest rate on the $35 million facility, which resets on a daily basis, was LIBOR plus 100 basis points (2.564%) with an annual facility fee of 20 basis points. The margin and facility fee are subject to changes in the Company's credit ratings.
(3)
Represents an estimate of interest due on the Company's unsecured bank credit facilities based on the outstanding unsecured credit facilities as of
December 31, 2017
and interest rates and maturity dates on the facilities as of
December 31, 2017
as discussed in note 2 above.
(4)
Represents commitments on real estate properties, except for tenant improvement obligations.
(5)
Represents commitments on properties under development, except for tenant improvement obligations.
(6)
Represents tenant improvement allowance obligations.
35
The Company anticipates that its current cash balance, operating cash flows, borrowings under its unsecured bank credit facilities, proceeds from new debt and/or proceeds from the issuance of equity instruments will be adequate for (i) operating and administrative expenses, (ii) normal repair and maintenance expenses at its properties, (iii) debt service obligations, (iv) maintaining compliance with its debt covenants, (v) distributions to stockholders, (vi) capital improvements, (vii) purchases of properties, (viii) development, and (ix) any other normal business activities of the Company, both in the short-term and long-term.
INFLATION AND OTHER ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS
Most of the Company's leases include scheduled rent increases. Additionally, most of the Company's leases require the tenants to pay their pro rata share of operating expenses, including real estate taxes, insurance and common area maintenance, thereby reducing the Company's exposure to increases in operating expenses resulting from inflation. In the event inflation causes increases in the Company’s general and administrative expenses or the level of interest rates, such increased costs would not be passed through to tenants and could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations.
EastGroup's financial results are affected by general economic conditions in the markets in which the Company's properties are located. The state of the economy, or other adverse changes in general or local economic conditions, could result in the inability of some of the Company's existing tenants to make lease payments and may therefore increase bad debt expense. It may also impact the Company’s ability to (i) renew leases or re-lease space as leases expire, or (ii) lease development space. In addition, an economic downturn or recession could also lead to an increase in overall vacancy rates or a decline in rents the Company can charge to re-lease properties upon expiration of current leases. In all of these cases, EastGroup’s cash flows would be adversely affected.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
The Company is exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of its unsecured bank credit facilities and long-term debt maturities. This debt is used to maintain liquidity and fund capital expenditures and expansion of the Company’s real estate investment portfolio and operations. The Company’s objective for interest rate risk management is to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower its overall borrowing costs. The Company has two variable rate unsecured bank credit facilities as discussed under
Liquidity and Capital Resources
. As market conditions permit, EastGroup issues equity and/or employs fixed-rate debt, including variable-rate debt that has been swapped to an effectively fixed rate through the use of interest rate swaps, to replace the short-term bank borrowings. The Company's interest rate swaps are discussed in Note 13 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The table below presents the principal payments due and weighted average interest rates, which include the impact of interest rate swaps, for both the fixed-rate and variable-rate debt as of
December 31, 2017
.
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Thereafter
Total
Fair Value
Unsecured bank credit facilities - variable
rate
(in thousands)
$
—
116,339
(1)
—
—
—
—
116,339
116,277
(2)
Weighted average
interest rate
—
2.53
%
(3)
—
—
—
—
2.53
%
Unsecured bank credit facilities - fixed rate
(in thousands)
$
—
80,000
—
—
—
—
80,000
80,003
(4)
Weighted average
interest rate
—
2.02
%
—
—
—
—
2.02
%
Unsecured debt - fixed
rate
(in thousands)
$
50,000
75,000
105,000
40,000
75,000
370,000
715,000
703,871
(4)
Weighted average
interest rate
3.91
%
2.85
%
3.55
%
2.34
%
3.03
%
3.56
%
3.38
%
Secured debt - fixed
rate
(in thousands)
$
11,314
55,569
9,096
89,563
32,769
2,043
200,354
206,408
(4)
Weighted average
interest rate
5.21
%
7.01
%
4.43
%
4.55
%
4.09
%
3.85
%
5.18
%
(1)
The variable-rate unsecured bank credit facilities mature in July 2019 and as of December 31, 2017, have balances of $110,000,000 (excluding the $80,000,000 draw with an effectively fixed rate due to an interest rate swap, as shown in the table above) on the $300 million unsecured bank credit facility and $6,339,000 on the $35 million unsecured bank credit facility.
(2)
The fair value of the Company’s variable-rate debt is estimated by discounting expected cash flows at current market rates, excluding the effects of debt issuance costs.
(3)
Represents the weighted average interest rate for the Company's variable rate unsecured bank credit facilities as of
December 31, 2017
.
(4)
The fair value of the Company’s fixed-rate debt, including variable-rate debt that has been swapped to an effectively fixed rate through the use of interest rate swaps, is estimated by discounting expected cash flows at the rates currently offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities, as advised by the Company’s bankers, excluding the effects of debt issuance costs.
36
As the table above incorporates only those exposures that existed as of
December 31, 2017
, it does not consider those exposures or positions that could arise after that date. If the weighted average interest rate on the variable-rate unsecured bank credit facilities, as shown above, changes by 10% or approximately 25 basis points, interest expense and cash flows would increase or decrease by approximately $294,000 annually. This does not include variable-rate debt that has been effectively fixed through the use of interest rate swaps.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
The Registrant's Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, and its Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income, Changes in Equity and Cash Flows and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended
December 31, 2017
,
2016
and
2015
and the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm thereon are included under Item 15 of this report and are incorporated herein by reference. Unaudited quarterly results of operations included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are also incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
(i)
Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of
December 31, 2017
, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the Company’s periodic SEC filings.
(ii)
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
(a)
Management's annual report on internal control over financial reporting.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). EastGroup’s Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting is set forth in Part IV, Item 15 of this Form 10-K on page 43 and is incorporated herein by reference.
(b)
Report of the independent registered public accounting firm.
The report of KPMG LLP, the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, on the Company's internal control over financial reporting is set forth in Part IV, Item 15 of this Form 10-K on page 44 and is incorporated herein by reference.
(c)
Changes in internal control over financial reporting.
There was no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting during the Company's fourth fiscal quarter ended
December 31, 2017
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.
Not applicable.
37
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.
The following table sets forth information regarding the Company’s executive officers and directors.
Name
Position
D. Pike Aloian
Director since 1999; Partner in Almanac Realty Investors, LLC (real estate advisory and investment management services)
H.C. Bailey, Jr.
Director since 1980; Chairman and President of H.C. Bailey Company (real estate development and investment)
H. Eric Bolton, Jr.
Director since 2013; Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.
Donald F. Colleran
Director since 2017; Executive Vice President, Chief Sales Officer of FedEx Corporation
Hayden C. Eaves III
Director since 2002; President of Hayden Holdings, Inc. (real estate investment)
Fredric H. Gould
Director since 1998; Chairman of the General Partner of Gould Investors L.P., Member of the Board of Directors of BRT Realty Trust and Vice-Chairman of One Liberty Properties, Inc.
Mary E. McCormick
Director since 2005; Director of Xenia Hotels and Resorts (lodging real estate investment trust (REIT)); Senior Lecturer at The Ohio State University, Fisher College of Business
Leland R. Speed
Director since 1978; Chairman Emeritus of the Board of the Company since 2016; Chairman of the Board of the Company from 1983 to 2015
David H. Hoster II
Director since 1993; Chairman of the Board of the Company since 2016; President of the Company from 1993 to 2015; Chief Executive Officer of the Company from 1997 to 2015
Marshall A. Loeb
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
Brent W. Wood
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company
John F. Coleman
Executive Vice President of the Company
Ryan M. Collins
Senior Vice President of the Company
Bruce Corkern
Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Secretary of the Company
R. Reid Dunbar
Senior Vice President of the Company
All other information required by Item 10 of Part III regarding the Company’s executive officers and directors is incorporated herein by reference from the sections entitled "Corporate Governance and Board Matters" and “Executive Officers” in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement ("
2018
Proxy Statement") to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for EastGroup's Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 24,
2018
. The
2018
Proxy Statement will be filed within 120 days after the end of the Company's fiscal year ended
December 31, 2017
.
The information regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act is incorporated herein by reference from the subsection entitled "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" in the Company's
2018
Proxy Statement.
Information regarding EastGroup's code of business conduct and ethics found in the subsection captioned "Available Information" in Item 1 of Part I hereof is also incorporated herein by reference into this Item 10.
The information regarding the Company's audit committee, its members and the audit committee financial experts is incorporated herein by reference from the subsection entitled "Committees and Meeting Data” in the Company's
2018
Proxy Statement.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
The information included under the following captions in the Company's
2018
Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference: "Compensation Discussion and Analysis," "Summary Compensation Table," "Grants of Plan-Based Awards in
2017
," "Outstanding Equity Awards at
2017
Fiscal Year-End," "Option Exercises and Stock Vested in
2017
," "Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control," "Compensation of Directors" and "Compensation Committee Interlocks." The information included under the heading "Report of the Compensation Committee" in the Company's
2018
Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference; however, this information shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or to be "filed" with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act.
38
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated herein by reference from the subsections entitled “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” and “Security Ownership of Management and Directors” in the Company’s
2018
Proxy Statement.
The following table summarizes the Company’s equity compensation plan information as of
December 31, 2017
.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
Plan category
(a)
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(b)
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(c)
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
—
—
1,671,981
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
—
—
—
Total
—
—
1,671,981
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.
The information regarding transactions with related parties and director independence is incorporated herein by reference from the subsection entitled "Independent Directors" and the section entitled “Certain Transactions and Relationships” in the Company's
2018
Proxy Statement.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.
The information regarding principal auditor fees and services is incorporated herein by reference from the section entitled "Auditor Fees and Services" in the Company's
2018
Proxy Statement.
39
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
(a)
The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
Page
(1)
Consolidated Financial Statements:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
42
Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
43
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
44
Consolidated Balance Sheets – December 31, 2017 and 2016
45
Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income – Years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
46
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity – Years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
47
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
48
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
49
(2)
Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules:
Schedule III – Real Estate Properties and Accumulated Depreciation
73
Schedule IV – Mortgage Loans on Real Estate
87
All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable, and therefore have been omitted, or the required information is included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(3)
Exhibits:
The following exhibits are filed with this Form 10-K or incorporated by reference to the listed document previously filed with the SEC:
Number
Description
(3)
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
(a)
Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the Company's Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on June 5, 1997).
(b)
Amended and Restated Bylaws of EastGroup Properties, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed March 3, 2017).
(10)
Material Contracts (*Indicates management or compensatory agreement):
(a)
Form of Severance and Change in Control Agreement that the Company has entered into with Marshall A. Loeb, Brent W. Wood and John F. Coleman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Company's Form 8-K filed May 18, 2016).*
(b)
Form of Severance and Change in Control Agreement that the Company has entered into with Ryan M. Collins, C. Bruce Corkern and R. Reid Dunbar (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the Company's Form 8-K filed May 18, 2016).*
(c)
Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement Dated January 2, 2013 among EastGroup Properties, L.P.; EastGroup Properties, Inc.; PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent; Regions Bank and SunTrust Bank as Co-Syndication Agents; U.S. Bank National Association and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Co-Documentation Agents; PNC Capital Markets LLC, as Sole Lead Arranger and Sole Bookrunner; and the Lenders thereunder (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed January 8, 2013).
(d)
First Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of August 9, 2013, among EastGroup Properties, L.P., EastGroup Properties, Inc. and PNC Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, and each of the financial institutions party thereto as lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 8-K filed August 30, 2013).
40
(e)
Second Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of July 30, 2015 by and among EastGroup Properties, L.P.; EastGroup Properties, Inc.; PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent; and each of the financial institutions party thereto as lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed August 4, 2015).
(f)
EastGroup Properties, Inc. 2013 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of March 3, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed March 3, 2017).*
(g)
EastGroup Properties, Inc. Director Compensation Program (filed herewith).*
(h)
Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 28, 2013, among EastGroup Properties, L.P., EastGroup Properties, Inc. and the purchasers of the notes party thereto (including the form of the 3.80% Senior Notes due August 28, 2025) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed August 30, 2013).
(i)
Amended and Restated Sales Agency Financing Agreement dated March 6, 2017 between EastGroup Properties, Inc. and BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed March 10, 2017).
(j)
Amended and Restated Sales Agency Financing Agreement dated March 6, 2017 between EastGroup Properties, Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 to the Company's Form 8-K filed March 10, 2017).
(k)
Amended and Restated Sales Agency Financing Agreement dated March 6, 2017 between EastGroup Properties, Inc. and Raymond James & Associates, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.3 to the Company's Form 8-K filed March 10, 2017).
(l)
Sales Agency Financing Agreement dated March 6, 2017 between EastGroup Properties, Inc. and Jefferies LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.4 to the Company's Form 8-K filed March 10, 2017).
(12)
Statement of computation of ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock distributions (filed herewith).
(21)
Subsidiaries of EastGroup Properties, Inc. (filed herewith).
(23)
Consent of KPMG LLP (filed herewith).
(24)
Powers of attorney (filed herewith).
(31)
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications (pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
(a)
Marshall A. Loeb, Chief Executive Officer
(b)
Brent W. Wood, Chief Financial Officer
(32)
Section 1350 Certifications (pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
(a)
Marshall A. Loeb, Chief Executive Officer
(b)
Brent W. Wood, Chief Financial Officer
(99)
Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed February 14, 2018).
(101)
The following materials from EastGroup Properties, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) consolidated balance sheets, (ii) consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, (iii) consolidated statements of changes in equity, (iv) consolidated statements of cash flows, and (v) the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
(b)
Exhibits
The exhibits required to be filed with this Report pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed under “Exhibits” in Part IV, Item 15(a)(3) of this Report and are incorporated herein by reference.
(c)
Financial Statement Schedules
The Financial Statement Schedules required to be filed with this Report are listed under “Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules” in Part IV, Item 15(a)(2) of this Report, and are incorporated herein by reference.
41
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
TO THE STOCKHOLDERS AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC.:
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of EastGroup Properties, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2017
, and the related notes and financial statement schedules III and IV (collectively, the "consolidated financial statements"). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2017
, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB"), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2017
, based on criteria established in
Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated
February 14, 2018
expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
(Signed) KPMG LLP
We have served as the Company's auditor since 1970.
Jackson, Mississippi
February 14, 2018
42
MANAGEMENT REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
EastGroup’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, EastGroup conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in
Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The design of any system of internal control over financial reporting is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Based on EastGroup’s evaluation under the framework in
Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)
, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of
December 31, 2017
.
/s/ EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC.
Ridgeland, Mississippi
February 14, 2018
43
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
TO THE STOCKHOLDERS AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC.:
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited EastGroup Properties, Inc. and subsidiaries’ (the "Company") internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2017
, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2017
, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB"), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2017
, and the related notes and financial statement schedules III and IV (collectively, the "consolidated financial statements"), and our report dated
February 14, 2018
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
(Signed) KPMG LLP
Jackson, Mississippi
February 14, 2018
44
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31,
2017
2016
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
ASSETS
Real estate properties
$
2,335,459
2,113,073
Development
242,014
293,908
2,577,473
2,406,981
Less accumulated depreciation
(749,601
)
(694,250
)
1,827,872
1,712,731
Unconsolidated investment
8,029
7,681
Cash
16
522
Other assets
117,304
104,830
TOTAL ASSETS
$
1,953,221
1,825,764
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
LIABILITIES
Unsecured bank credit facilities
$
195,709
190,990
Unsecured debt
713,061
652,838
Secured debt
199,512
257,505
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
64,967
52,701
Other liabilities
28,842
29,864
Total Liabilities
1,202,091
1,183,898
EQUITY
Stockholders’ Equity:
Common shares; $.0001 par value; 70,000,000 shares authorized;
34,758,167 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017 and
33,332,213 at December 31, 2016
3
3
Excess shares; $.0001 par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized;
no shares issued
—
—
Additional paid-in capital
1,061,153
949,318
Distributions in excess of earnings
(317,032
)
(313,655
)
Accumulated other comprehensive income
5,348
1,995
Total Stockholders’ Equity
749,472
637,661
Noncontrolling interest in joint ventures
1,658
4,205
Total Equity
751,130
641,866
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$
1,953,221
1,825,764
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
45
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Years Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
(In thousands, except per share data)
REVENUES
Income from real estate operations
$
274,031
252,961
234,918
Other revenue
119
86
90
274,150
253,047
235,008
EXPENSES
Expenses from real estate operations
80,108
74,347
67,402
Depreciation and amortization
83,874
77,935
73,290
General and administrative
14,972
13,232
15,091
Acquisition costs
—
161
164
178,954
165,675
155,947
OPERATING INCOME
95,196
87,372
79,061
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Interest expense
(34,775
)
(35,213
)
(34,666
)
Gain, net of loss, on sales of real estate investments
21,855
42,170
2,903
Other
1,313
1,765
1,101
NET INCOME
83,589
96,094
48,399
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in joint ventures
(406
)
(585
)
(533
)
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
83,183
95,509
47,866
Other comprehensive income (loss) - cash flow hedges
3,353
5,451
(1,099
)
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
$
86,536
100,960
46,767
BASIC PER COMMON SHARE DATA FOR NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
2.45
2.93
1.49
Weighted average shares outstanding
33,996
32,563
32,091
DILUTED PER COMMON SHARE DATA FOR NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
Net income attributable to common stockholders
$
2.44
2.93
1.49
Weighted average shares outstanding
34,047
32,628
32,196
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
46
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
Common
Stock
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
Distributions
In Excess
Of Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Noncontrolling
Interest in
Joint Ventures
Total
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Balance, December 31, 2014
$
3
874,335
(300,852
)
(2,357
)
4,486
575,615
Net income
—
—
47,866
—
533
48,399
Net unrealized change in fair value of cash flow hedges
—
—
—
(1,099
)
—
(1,099
)
Common dividends declared – $2.34 per share
—
—
(75,906
)
—
—
(75,906
)
Stock-based compensation, net of forfeitures
—
8,423
—
—
—
8,423
Issuance of 106,751 shares of common stock,
common stock offering, net of expenses
—
6,233
—
—
—
6,233
Issuance of 4,536 shares of common stock,
dividend reinvestment plan
—
257
—
—
—
257
Withheld 32,409 shares of common stock to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock
—
(2,041
)
—
—
—
(2,041
)
Distributions to noncontrolling interest
—
—
—
—
(680
)
(680
)
Balance, December 31, 2015
3
887,207
(328,892
)
(3,456
)
4,339
559,201
Net income
—
—
95,509
—
585
96,094
Net unrealized change in fair value of cash flow hedges
—
—
—
5,451
—
5,451
Common dividends declared – $2.44 per share
—
—
(80,272
)
—
—
(80,272
)
Stock-based compensation, net of forfeitures
—
5,831
—
—
—
5,831
Issuance of 875,052 shares of common stock, common stock offering, net of expenses
—
59,283
—
—
—
59,283
Issuance of 3,326 shares of common stock,
dividend reinvestment plan
—
228
—
—
—
228
Withheld 57,316 shares of common stock to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock
—
(3,231
)
—
—
—
(3,231
)
Distributions to noncontrolling interest
—
—
—
—
(719
)
(719
)
Balance, December 31, 2016
3
949,318
(313,655
)
1,995
4,205
641,866
Net income
—
—
83,183
—
406
83,589
Net unrealized change in fair value of cash flow hedges
—
—
—
3,353
—
3,353
Common dividends declared – $2.52 per share
—
—
(86,560
)
—
—
(86,560
)
Stock-based compensation, net of forfeitures
—
7,012
—
—
—
7,012
Issuance of 1,370,457 shares of common stock, common stock offering, net of expenses
—
109,207
—
—
—
109,207
Issuance of 2,744 shares of common stock,
dividend reinvestment plan
—
228
—
—
—
228
Withheld 33,695 shares of common stock to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock
—
(2,505
)
—
—
—
(2,505
)
Purchase of noncontrolling interest in joint venture
—
(2,107
)
—
—
(2,597
)
(4,704
)
Distributions to noncontrolling interest
—
—
—
—
(478
)
(478
)
Contributions from noncontrolling interest
—
—
—
—
122
122
Balance, December 31, 2017
$
3
1,061,153
(317,032
)
5,348
1,658
751,130
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
47
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
(In thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
$
83,589
96,094
48,399
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
83,874
77,935
73,290
Stock-based compensation expense
5,521
4,590
6,733
Gain, net of loss, on sales of real estate investments and non-operating real estate
(22,148
)
(42,903
)
(3,026
)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accrued income and other assets
(5,034
)
(2,883
)
(2,118
)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and prepaid rent
8,333
5,736
6,928
Other
879
295
(157
)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
155,014
138,864
130,049
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Real estate development
(124,938
)
(203,765
)
(95,032
)
Purchases of real estate
(55,195
)
(27,668
)
(31,574
)
Real estate improvements
(26,158
)
(23,778
)
(25,062
)
Net proceeds from sales of real estate investments and non-operating real estate
42,710
78,780
5,156
Repayments on mortgage loans receivable
171
123
116
Changes in accrued development costs
(144
)
3,629
(1,705
)
Changes in other assets and other liabilities
(15,872
)
(13,793
)
(8,317
)
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
(179,426
)
(186,472
)
(156,418
)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from unsecured bank credit facilities
391,617
608,349
420,104
Repayments on unsecured bank credit facilities
(387,298
)
(567,165
)
(368,669
)
Proceeds from unsecured debt
60,000
205,000
150,000
Repayments on unsecured debt
—
(80,000
)
—
Repayments on secured debt
(58,209
)
(92,773
)
(102,337
)
Debt issuance costs
(380
)
(1,487
)
(1,952
)
Distributions paid to stockholders (not including dividends accrued on unvested restricted stock)
(86,725
)
(80,899
)
(75,845
)
Proceeds from common stock offerings
109,207
59,283
6,233
Proceeds from dividend reinvestment plan
228
236
256
Other
(4,534
)
(2,462
)
(1,384
)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES
23,906
48,082
26,406
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
(506
)
474
37
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR
522
48
11
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR
$
16
522
48
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid for interest, net of amount capitalized of $5,765, $5,340, and
$5,257 for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively
$
33,634
33,595
33,164
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
48
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2017
,
2016
and
2015
(1)
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(a)
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of EastGroup Properties, Inc. ("EastGroup" or "the Company"), its wholly owned subsidiaries and its investment in any joint ventures in which the Company has a controlling interest.
At December 31, 2015, EastGroup had a controlling interest in
two
joint ventures, the
80%
owned University Business Center and the
80%
owned Castilian Research Center. During the second quarter of 2016, Castilian Research Center was sold, and the joint venture was subsequently terminated. At December 31, 2016, the Company had a controlling interest in
one
joint venture, the
80%
owned University Business Center. During the fourth quarter of 2017, EastGroup closed the acquisition of the
20%
noncontrolling interest in two of the four University Business Center buildings; the Company now owns
100%
of University Business Center 125 and 175. As of December 31, 2017, EastGroup had an
80%
controlling interest in University Business Center 120 and 130.
The Company records
100%
of the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of the buildings held in joint ventures with the noncontrolling interests provided for in accordance with the joint venture agreements.
The equity method of accounting is used for the Company’s
50%
undivided tenant-in-common interest in Industry Distribution Center II. All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.
(b)
Income Taxes
EastGroup, a Maryland corporation, has qualified as a real estate investment trust (REIT) under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code and intends to continue to qualify as such. To maintain its status as a REIT, the Company is required to distribute at least
90%
of its ordinary taxable income to its stockholders. If the Company has a capital gain, it has the option of (i) deferring recognition of the capital gain through a tax-deferred exchange, (ii) declaring and paying a capital gain dividend on any recognized net capital gain resulting in no corporate level tax, or (iii) retaining and paying corporate income tax on its net long-term capital gain, with the shareholders reporting their proportional share of the undistributed long-term capital gain and receiving a credit or refund of their share of the tax paid by the Company. The Company distributed all of its
2017
,
2016
and
2015
taxable income to its stockholders. Accordingly, no significant provisions for income taxes were necessary. The following table summarizes the federal income tax treatment for all distributions by the Company for the years ended
2017
,
2016
and
2015
.
Federal Income Tax Treatment of Share Distributions
Years Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
Common Share Distributions:
Ordinary dividends
$
2.49146
2.10494
2.24258
Nondividend distributions
0.02686
0.05202
0.02774
Unrecaptured Section 1250 capital gain
—
0.12872
0.06968
Other capital gain
0.00168
0.15432
—
Total Common Share Distributions
$
2.52000
2.44000
2.34000
EastGroup applies the principles of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 740,
Income Taxes,
when evaluating and accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. With few exceptions, the Company’s 2013 and earlier tax years are closed for examination by U.S. federal, state and local tax authorities. In accordance with the provisions of ASC 740, the Company had no significant uncertain tax positions as of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
.
The Company’s income may differ for tax and financial reporting purposes principally because of (1) the timing of the deduction for the provision for possible losses and losses on investments, (2) the timing of the recognition of gains or losses from the sale of investments, (3) different depreciation methods and lives, (4) real estate properties having a different basis for tax and financial reporting purposes, (5) mortgage loans having a different basis for tax and financial reporting purposes, thereby producing different gains upon collection of these loans, and (6) differences in book and tax allowances and timing for stock-based compensation expense.
49
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(c)
Income Recognition
Minimum rental income from real estate operations is recognized on a straight-line basis. The straight-line rent calculation on leases includes the effects of rent concessions and scheduled rent increases, and the calculated straight-line rent income is recognized over the lives of the individual leases. The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts receivable, including straight-line rents receivable, based upon estimates determined by management. Management specifically analyzes aged receivables, customer credit-worthiness and current economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts.
Revenue is recognized on payments received from tenants for early terminations after all criteria have been met in accordance with ASC 840,
Leases.
The Company recognizes gains on sales of real estate in accordance with the principles set forth in ASC 360,
Property, Plant and Equipment
. Upon closing of real estate transactions, the provisions of ASC 360 require consideration for the transfer of rights of ownership to the purchaser, receipt of an adequate cash down payment from the purchaser, adequate continuing investment by the purchaser and no substantial continuing involvement by the Company. If the requirements for recognizing gains have not been met, the sale and related costs are recorded, but the gain is deferred and recognized by a method other than the full accrual method.
The Company recognizes interest income on mortgage loans on the accrual method unless a significant uncertainty of collection exists. If a significant uncertainty exists, interest income is recognized as collected. If applicable, discounts on mortgage loans receivable are amortized over the lives of the loans using a method that does not differ materially from the interest method. The Company evaluates the collectibility of both interest and principal on each of its loans to determine whether the loans are impaired. A loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the existing contractual terms. When a loan is considered to be impaired, the amount of loss is calculated by comparing the recorded investment to the value determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at the loan’s effective interest rate or to the fair value of the underlying collateral (if the loan is collateralized) less costs to sell. As of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, there was no significant uncertainty of collection; therefore, interest income was recognized. As of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, the Company determined that no allowance for collectibility of the mortgage loans receivable was necessary.
(d)
Real Estate Properties
EastGroup has one reportable segment–industrial properties. These properties are concentrated in major Sunbelt markets of the United States, primarily in the states of Florida, Texas, Arizona, California and North Carolina, have similar economic characteristics and also meet the other criteria that permit the properties to be aggregated into one reportable segment.
The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows (including estimated future expenditures necessary to substantially complete the asset) expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. As of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, the Company did not identify any impairment charges which should be recorded.
Depreciation of buildings and other improvements is computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of generally
40
years for buildings and
3
to
15
years for improvements. Building improvements are capitalized, while maintenance and repair expenses are charged to expense as incurred. Significant renovations and improvements that improve or extend the useful life of the assets are capitalized. Depreciation expense was
$69,010,000
,
$63,793,000
and $
59,882,000
for
2017
,
2016
and
2015
, respectively.
(e)
Development
For properties under development and properties acquired in the development stage, costs associated with development (i.e., land, construction costs, interest expense, property taxes and other direct and indirect costs associated with development) are aggregated into the total capitalized costs of the property. Included in these costs are management’s estimates for the portions of internal costs (primarily personnel costs) deemed related to such development activities. The internal costs are allocated to specific development properties based on development activity. As the property becomes occupied, depreciation commences on the occupied portion of the building, and costs are capitalized only for the portion of the building that remains vacant. When the property becomes
80%
occupied or
one
year after completion of the shell construction (whichever comes first), capitalization of development costs, including interest expense, property taxes and internal personnel costs, ceases. The properties are then transferred to
Real estate properties
, and depreciation commences on the entire property (excluding the land).
50
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Effective January 1, 2018, the Company is implementing an accounting policy change and will begin transferring properties from
Development
to
Real estate properties
at the earlier of
90%
occupancy or
one
year after completion of the shell construction.
(f)
Real Estate Held for Sale
The Company considers a real estate property to be held for sale when it meets the criteria established under ASC 360,
Property, Plant and Equipment,
including when it is probable that the property will be sold within a year. Real estate properties held for sale are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less estimated costs to sell and are not depreciated while they are held for sale.
In accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-08,
Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360), Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity,
the Company would report a disposal of a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity in discontinued operations if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity's operations and financial results when the component or group of components meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale or when the component or group of components is disposed of by sale or other than by sale. In addition, the Company would provide additional disclosures about both discontinued operations and the disposal of an individually significant component of an entity that does not qualify for discontinued operations presentation in the financial statements. EastGroup performs an analysis of properties sold to determine whether the sales qualify for discontinued operations presentation.
(g)
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
EastGroup applies ASC 815,
Derivatives and Hedging
, which requires all entities with derivative instruments to disclose information regarding how and why the entity uses derivative instruments and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect the entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. See Note 13 for a discussion of the Company's derivative instruments and hedging activities.
(h)
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
(i)
Amortization
Debt origination costs are deferred and amortized over the term of each loan using the effective interest method. Amortization of debt issuance costs was
$1,250,000
,
$1,534,000
and
$1,336,000
for
2017
,
2016
and
2015
, respectively. Amortization of facility fees was
$670,000
,
$670,000
and
$608,000
for
2017
,
2016
and
2015
, respectively.
Leasing costs are deferred and amortized using the straight-line method over the term of the lease. Leasing costs paid during the period are included in
Changes in other assets and other liabilities
in the Investing Activities section on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Leasing costs amortization expense was
$10,329,000
,
$9,932,000
and
$9,038,000
for
2017
,
2016
and
2015
, respectively.
Amortization expense for in-place lease intangibles is disclosed below in
Real Estate Property Acquisitions and Acquired Intangibles
.
(j)
Real Estate Property Acquisitions and Acquired Intangibles
Upon acquisition of real estate properties, EastGroup applies the principles of ASC 805,
Business Combinations.
Prior to the Company's adoption of ASU 2017-01,
Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business,
effective October 1, 2016, acquisition-related costs were recognized as expenses in the periods in which the costs were incurred and the services were received.
As discussed in Note 1(o), beginning with acquisitions after October 1, 2016, the Company follows the guidance in ASU 2017-01, which provides a new framework for determining whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. Under the new guidance, companies are required to utilize an initial screening test to determine whether substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets; if so, the set is not a business. EastGroup has determined that its real estate property acquisitions in 2017 and the fourth quarter of 2016 are considered to be acquisitions of groups of similar identifiable assets; therefore, the acquisitions are not considered to be acquisitions of a business. As a result, the Company has capitalized acquisition costs related to its 2017 and fourth quarter 2016 acquisitions.
The FASB Codification provides guidance on how to properly determine the allocation of the purchase price among the individual components of both the tangible and intangible assets based on their respective fair values. Goodwill for business combinations is recorded when the purchase price exceeds the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired. Factors considered by management
51
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
in allocating the cost of the properties acquired include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. The allocation to tangible assets (land, building and improvements) is based upon management’s determination of the value of the property as if it were vacant using discounted cash flow models. The Company determines whether any financing assumed is above or below market based upon comparison to similar financing terms for similar properties. The cost of the properties acquired may be adjusted based on indebtedness assumed from the seller that is determined to be above or below market rates.
The purchase price is also allocated among the following categories of intangible assets: the above or below market component of in-place leases, the value of in-place leases, and the value of customer relationships. The value allocable to the above or below market component of an acquired in-place lease is determined based upon the present value (using a discount rate reflecting the risks associated with the acquired leases) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the lease over its remaining term, and (ii) management’s estimate of the amounts that would be paid using fair market rates over the remaining term of the lease. The amounts allocated to above and below market leases are included in
Other assets
and
Other liabilities
, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are amortized to rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases. The total amount of intangible assets is further allocated to in-place lease values and customer relationship values based upon management’s assessment of their respective values. These intangible assets are included in
Other assets
on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are amortized over the remaining term of the existing lease, or the anticipated life of the customer relationship, as applicable.
Amortization of above and below market leases increased rental income by
$529,000
,
$488,000
and
$448,000
in
2017
,
2016
and
2015
, respectively. Amortization expense for in-place lease intangibles was
$4,535,000
,
$4,210,000
and
$4,370,000
for
2017
,
2016
and
2015
, respectively.
Projected amortization of in-place lease intangibles for the next five years as of
December 31, 2017
is as follows:
Years Ending December 31,
(In thousands)
2018
$
3,576
2019
2,555
2020
1,911
2021
1,482
2022
893
During 2017, the Company acquired the following operating properties: Shiloh 400, Broadmoor Commerce Park and Hurricane Shoals 1 & 2 in Atlanta and Southpark Corporate Center 5-7 in Austin. The Company also acquired one development stage property, Progress Center 1 & 2 in Atlanta. At the time of acquisition, Progress Center 1 & 2 was classified in the lease-up phase of development. The total cost for the properties acquired by the Company was
$65,243,000
, of which
$51,539,000
was allocated to
Real estate properties
and
$10,312,000
was allocated to
Development
. EastGroup allocated
$11,281,000
of the total purchase price to land using third party land valuations for the Atlanta and Austin markets. The market values are considered to be Level 3 inputs as defined by ASC 820,
Fair Value Measurement
(see Note 18 for additional information on ASC 820). Intangibles associated with the purchase of real estate were allocated as follows:
$3,662,000
to in-place lease intangibles and
$115,000
to above market leases (included in
Other assets
on the Consolidated Balance Sheets), and
$385,000
to below market leases (included in
Other liabilities
on the Consolidated Balance Sheets). These costs are amortized over the remaining lives of the associated leases in place at the time of acquisition.
During 2016, the Company acquired the following development-stage properties: Parc North in Ft. Worth (Dallas), Weston Commerce Park in Weston (South Florida), and Jones Corporate Park in Las Vegas. At the time of acquisition, the properties were classified as under construction or in the lease-up phase of development.
Also in 2016, the Company acquired Flagler Center, a
three
-building business distribution complex in Jacksonville, Florida.
The properties purchased in 2016 were acquired for a total cost of
$112,158,000
, of which
$22,228,000
was allocated to
Real estate properties
and
$84,490,000
was allocated to
Development
. EastGroup allocated
$29,164,000
of the total purchase price to land using third party land valuations for the Dallas, South Florida, Las Vegas and Jacksonville markets. The market values are considered to be Level 3 inputs as defined by ASC 820. Intangibles associated with the purchase of real estate were allocated as follows:
$5,941,000
to in-place lease intangibles,
$393,000
to above market leases and
$894,000
to below market leases.
52
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
During 2015, the Company acquired Southpark Corporate Center and Springdale Business Center, both in Austin, Texas, for a total cost of
$31,574,000
, of which
$28,648,000
was allocated to
Real estate properties
. The Company allocated
$5,494,000
of the total purchase price to land using third party land valuations for the Austin market. The market values are considered to be Level 3 inputs as defined by ASC 820. Intangibles associated with the purchase of real estate were allocated as follows:
$3,453,000
to in-place lease intangibles and
$527,000
to below market leases.
The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of goodwill (at least annually) and the recoverability of other intangibles (on a quarterly basis) for possible impairment. In management’s opinion, no impairment of goodwill and other intangibles existed at December 31,
2017
and
2016
.
(k)
Stock-Based Compensation
In May 2004, the stockholders of the Company approved the EastGroup Properties, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Plan ("the 2004 Plan"), which was further amended by the Board of Directors in September 2005 and December 2006. This plan authorized the issuance of common stock to employees in the form of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, deferred stock units, performance shares, bonus stock or stock in lieu of cash compensation.
In April 2013, the Board of Directors adopted the EastGroup Properties, Inc. 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2013 Equity Plan”) upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee; the 2013 Equity Plan was approved by the Company's stockholders and became effective May 29, 2013. The 2013 Equity Plan was further amended by the Board of Directors in March 2017. The 2013 Equity Plan replaced the 2004 Plan and the 2005 Directors Equity Incentive Plan. Typically, the Company issues new shares to fulfill stock grants or upon the exercise of stock options.
EastGroup applies the provisions of ASC 718,
Compensation – Stock Compensation
, to account for its stock-based compensation plans. ASC 718 requires that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements and that the cost be measured on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. The cost for market-based awards and awards that only require service are expensed on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods. The cost for performance-based awards is determined using the graded vesting attribution method which recognizes each separate vesting portion of the award as a separate award on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. This method accelerates the expensing of the award compared to the straight-line method.
The total compensation expense for service and performance based awards is based upon the fair market value of the shares on the grant date. The grant date fair value for awards that have been granted and are subject to a future market condition (total shareholder return) are determined using a simulation pricing model developed to specifically accommodate the unique features of the awards.
During the restricted period for awards no longer subject to contingencies, the Company accrues dividends and holds the certificates for the shares; however, the employee can vote the shares. Share certificates and dividends are delivered to the employee as they vest.
(l)
Earnings Per Share
The Company applies ASC 260,
Earnings Per Share
, which requires companies to present basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS). Basic EPS represents the amount of earnings for the period attributable to each share of common stock outstanding during the reporting period. The Company’s basic EPS is calculated by dividing
Net Income Attributable to EastGroup Properties, Inc. Common Stockholders
by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. The weighted average number of common shares outstanding does not include any potentially dilutive securities or any unvested restricted shares of common stock. These unvested restricted shares, although classified as issued and outstanding, are considered forfeitable until the restrictions lapse and will not be included in the basic EPS calculation until the shares are vested.
Diluted EPS represents the amount of earnings for the period attributable to each share of common stock outstanding during the reporting period and to each share that would have been outstanding assuming the issuance of common shares for all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the reporting period. The Company calculates diluted EPS by dividing
Net Income Attributable to EastGroup Properties, Inc. Common Stockholders
by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect of unvested restricted stock. The dilutive effect of unvested restricted stock is determined using the treasury stock method.
(m)
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and revenues and expenses
53
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
during the reporting period and to disclose material contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(n)
Risks and Uncertainties
The state of the overall economy can significantly impact the Company’s operational performance and thus impact its financial position. Should EastGroup experience a significant decline in operational performance, it may affect the Company’s ability to make distributions to its shareholders, service debt, or meet other financial obligations.
(o)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
EastGroup has evaluated all ASUs recently released by the FASB through the date the financial statements were issued and determined that the following ASUs apply to the Company.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers,
which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The FASB issued further guidance in ASU 2016-12,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients,
that provides clarifying guidance in certain narrow areas and adds some practical expedients. ASU 2014-09 will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. The effective date of ASU 2014-09 was extended by one year by ASU 2015-14,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date.
The new standard was effective for the Company on January 1, 2018, and the Company is using the modified retrospective approach upon adoption. The Company has made significant progress in evaluating the effect of ASU 2014-09 on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures beginning with the Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2018. The Company has completed its inventory of its sources of revenue and does not believe there will be a material financial statement impact or that its pattern of revenue recognition will be materially impacted by the adoption of ASU 2014-09.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01,
Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,
which requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes, requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset, and eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized costs on the balance sheet. EastGroup adopted ASU 2016-01 effective January 1, 2018. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of ASU 2016-01 will have a material impact on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02,
Leases (Topic 842),
which requires lessees to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date: (1) a lease liability, which is a lessee's obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and (2) a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee's right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. The Company is a lessee on a limited number of leases, including office and ground leases, and while the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will impact the Company's accounting for office and ground leases, the Company anticipates the impact will not be material to its overall financial condition and results of operations. Lessor accounting is largely unchanged under ASU 2016-02. The Company's primary revenue is rental income; as such, the Company is a lessor on a significant number of leases. The Company is continuing to evaluate the potential impacts of the ASU and believes it will continue to account for its leases in substantially the same manner. The most significant changes for the Company related to lessor accounting include bifurcating its revenue into lease and non-lease components and the new standard's narrow definition of initial direct costs for leases. The new definition will result in certain costs (primarily legal costs related to lease negotiations) being expensed rather than capitalized upon adoption of the new standard. Public business entities are required to apply the amendments in ASU 2016-02 for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. EastGroup plans to adopt ASU 2016-02 effective January 1, 2019. The Company is continuing the process of evaluating and quantifying the effect that ASU 2016-02 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures beginning with the Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2019.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09,
Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting
. The ASU is intended to improve the accounting for share-based payments and affects all organizations that issue share-based payment awards to their employees. Several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment awards are simplified with the ASU, including income tax consequences, classification of awards as equity or liabilities and classification on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years; early adoption is permitted. EastGroup adopted ASU 2016-09 effective January 1, 2017. As a result, the Company elected to reverse compensation cost of any forfeited awards when they occur and will continue to classify the cash flows resulting from remitting cash to the tax authorities for the payment of taxes on the vesting of share-based payment awards as a financing activity on the Consolidated Statements of Cash
54
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Flows. In addition, upon vesting of share-based payments, the Company will withhold up to the maximum individual statutory tax rate and classify the entire award as equity. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15,
Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments,
which addresses certain cash flow issues, including how debt prepayments or debt extinguishment costs and distributions received from equity method investees are presented. ASU 2016-15 is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, and the Company has adopted ASU 2016-15 effective January 1, 2017. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01,
Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business
. The ASU is intended to provide a new framework for determining whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. Under the new guidance, companies are required to utilize an initial screening test to determine whether substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets; if so, the set is not a business. The Company has determined that some of its real estate property acquisitions may be considered to be acquisitions of groups of similar identifiable assets; therefore, the acquisitions are not considered to be acquisitions of a business. EastGroup adopted ASU 2017-01 for transactions beginning on October 1, 2016. As a result, the Company has capitalized acquisition costs related to its 2017 and fourth quarter 2016 acquisitions as they were determined not to be acquisitions of a business.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04,
Intangibles - Goodwill and Others (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment,
which simplifies the measurement of goodwill impairment by eliminating the requirement of performing a hypothetical purchase price allocation to measure goodwill impairment. The Company adopted ASU 2017-04 effective January 1, 2017, and is applying the new guidance for goodwill impairment tests with measurement dates after January 1, 2017. The adoption of ASU 2017-04 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09,
Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting,
which clarifies what constitutes a modification of a share-based payment award. The ASU is intended to provide clarity and reduce both diversity in practice and cost and complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718 to a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. ASU 2017-09 is effective for public entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted ASU 2017-09 on January 1, 2018, and it does not anticipate that the adoption of ASU 2017-09 will have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations, as the Company does not expect to have any modifications to share-based payment awards. However, if the Company does have a modification to an award in the future, it will follow the guidance in ASU 2017-09.
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12,
Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities.
The ASU is intended to better align a company's financial reporting for hedging activities with the economic objectives of those activities. The transition method is a modified retrospective approach that will require the Company to recognize the cumulative effect of initially applying the ASU as an adjustment to
Accumulated other comprehensive income
with a corresponding adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year the entity adopts the ASU. The primary provision in the ASU that will require an adjustment to beginning retained earnings is the change in timing and income statement presentation for ineffectiveness related to cash flow and net investment hedges. As a result of the transition guidance in the ASU, cumulative ineffectiveness that has previously been recognized on cash flow and net investment hedges that are still outstanding and designated as of the date of adoption will be adjusted and removed from beginning retained earnings and placed in
Accumulated other comprehensive income.
ASU 2017-12 is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted; however, the Company plans to adopt ASU 2017-12 on January 1, 2019. While the Company continues to assess all potential impacts of ASU 2017-12, it does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.
(p)
Classification of Book Overdraft on Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
The Company classifies changes in book overdraft in which the bank has not advanced cash to the Company to cover outstanding checks as an operating activity. Such amounts are included in
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and prepaid rent
in the Operating Activities section on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
(q)
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made in the
2016
and
2015
consolidated financial statements to conform to the
2017
presentation.
55
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(2)
REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES
The Company’s
Real estate properties
and
Development
at
December 31, 2017
and
2016
were as follows:
December 31,
2017
2016
(In thousands)
Real estate properties:
Land
$
345,424
308,931
Buildings and building improvements
1,587,130
1,435,309
Tenant and other improvements
402,905
368,833
Development
242,014
293,908
2,577,473
2,406,981
Less accumulated depreciation
(749,601
)
(694,250
)
$
1,827,872
1,712,731
EastGroup acquired operating properties during
2017
,
2016
and
2015
as discussed in Note 1(j).
In 2017, Eastgroup sold Stemmons Circle and Techway Southwest I-IV.
In 2016, the Company sold the following operating properties: Northwest Point Distribution and Service Centers, North Stemmons II and III, America Plaza, Lockwood Distribution Center, West Loop Distribution Center 1 & 2, two of its four Interstate Commons Distribution Center buildings, Castilian Research Center and Memphis I.
In 2015, the Company sold one operating property, the last of its three Ambassador Row Warehouses.
The results of operations and gains and losses on sales for the properties sold during the periods presented are reported in continuing operations on the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. The gains and losses on sales are included in
Gain, net of loss, on sales of real estate investments.
The Company did not classify any properties as held for sale as of
December 31, 2017
and 2016.
56
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Sales of Real Estate
A summary of
Gain, net of loss, on sales of real estate investments
for the years ended
December 31, 2017
,
2016
and
2015
follows:
Real Estate Properties
Location
Size
(in Square Feet)
Date Sold
Net Sales Price
Basis
Recognized Gain
(In thousands)
2017
Stemmons Circle
Dallas, TX
99,000
05/12/2017
$
5,051
1,329
3,722
Techway Southwest I-IV
Houston, TX
415,000
06/19/2017
32,506
14,373
18,133
Total for 2017
$
37,557
15,702
21,855
2016
Northwest Point Distribution
and Service Centers
Houston, TX
232,000
02/12/2016
$
15,189
5,080
10,109
North Stemmons III
Dallas, TX
60,000
03/04/2016
3,131
1,908
1,223
North Stemmons II
Dallas, TX
26,000
04/12/2016
1,203
765
438
Lockwood Distribution Center
Houston, TX
392,000
04/18/2016
14,024
4,154
9,870
West Loop Distribution Center 1 & 2
Houston, TX
161,000
04/19/2016
13,154
3,564
9,590
America Plaza
Houston, TX
121,000
04/28/2016
7,938
3,378
4,560
Interstate Commons Distribution
Center 1 & 2
Phoenix, AZ
142,000
05/31/2016
9,906
3,568
6,338
Castilian Research Center
(1)
Santa Barbara, CA
30,000
06/28/2016
7,698
7,513
185
Memphis I
Memphis, TN
92,000
12/16/2016
1,482
1,625
(143
)
Total for 2016
$
73,725
31,555
42,170
2015
Ambassador Row Warehouse
Dallas, TX
185,000
04/13/2015
$
4,998
2,095
2,903
(1)
EastGroup owned
80%
of Castilian Research Center through a joint venture. The information shown for this transaction also includes the
20%
attributable to the Company's noncontrolling interest partner.
The table above includes sales of operating properties; the Company also sold parcels of land during the years presented. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company sold parcels of land in El Paso and Dallas for total gross proceeds of
$3,778,000
and recognized a net gain of
$293,000
. During the year ended December 31, 2016, EastGroup sold parcels of land in Houston, Dallas and Orlando for
$5,400,000
and recognized a gain of
$733,000
. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company sold a small parcel of land in New Orleans for
$170,000
and recognized a gain of
$123,000
. The net gains on sales of land are included in
Other
on the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income.
Development
The Company’s development program as of
December 31, 2017
, was comprised of the properties detailed in the table below. Costs incurred include capitalization of interest costs during the period of construction. The interest costs capitalized on development properties for
2017
were
$5,765,000
compared to
$5,340,000
for
2016
and
$5,257,000
for
2015
. In addition, EastGroup capitalized internal development costs of
$4,754,000
during the year ended
December 31, 2017
, compared to
$3,789,000
during
2016
and
$4,467,000
in
2015
.
Total capital invested for development during
2017
was
$124,938,000
, which primarily consisted of costs of
$93,395,000
and
$14,819,000
as detailed in the
Development Activity
table below and costs of
$12,811,000
on development properties subsequent to transfer to
Real estate properties
. The capitalized costs incurred on development properties subsequent to transfer to
Real estate properties
include capital improvements at the properties and do not include other capitalized costs associated with development (i.e., interest expense, property taxes and internal personnel costs).
57
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Costs Incurred
Anticipated Building Conversion Date
Costs
Transferred
in 2017
(1)
For the
Year Ended
12/31/17
Cumulative
as of
12/31/17
Estimated
Total Costs
(2)
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
LEASE-UP
Building Size (Square feet)
Alamo Ridge IV, San Antonio, TX
97,000
$
—
2,152
7,097
8,300
03/18
Weston, Ft. Lauderdale, FL
(3)
134,000
—
1,239
15,520
16,000
03/18
Oak Creek VII, Tampa, FL
116,000
2,153
3,978
6,131
7,500
04/18
Progress Center 1 & 2, Atlanta, GA
(4)
132,000
—
10,333
10,333
11,100
04/18
Eisenhauer Point 3, San Antonio, TX
71,000
—
3,411
6,159
6,800
06/18
SunCoast 4, Ft. Myers, FL
93,000
—
2,865
9,120
10,000
06/18
Steele Creek VII, Charlotte, NC
120,000
2,393
5,404
7,797
8,600
09/18
Horizon XII, Orlando, FL
140,000
3,825
7,405
11,230
12,100
12/18
Total Lease-Up
903,000
8,371
36,787
73,387
80,400
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Country Club V, Tucson, AZ
300,000
—
10,656
13,951
24,200
04/18
Kyrene 202 III, IV & V, Phoenix, AZ
166,000
2,280
9,263
11,543
13,800
02/19
CreekView 121 3 & 4, Dallas, TX
158,000
3,701
6,610
10,311
14,200
03/19
Eisenhauer Point 5, San Antonio, TX
98,000
1,253
4,551
5,804
7,500
03/19
Eisenhauer Point 6, San Antonio, TX
85,000
878
3,172
4,050
5,200
03/19
Horizon X, Orlando, FL
104,000
2,101
1,449
3,550
8,000
04/19
Falcon Field, Phoenix, AZ
96,000
1,733
1,214
2,947
9,000
05/19
Airport Commerce Center 3, Charlotte, NC
96,000
1,653
80
1,733
7,300
07/19
Settlers Crossing 1, Austin, TX
77,000
1,494
62
1,556
7,400
10/19
Settlers Crossing 2, Austin, TX
83,000
1,606
67
1,673
8,000
10/19
Total Under Construction
1,263,000
16,699
37,124
57,118
104,600
PROSPECTIVE DEVELOPMENT (PRIMARILY LAND)
Estimated Building Size (Square feet)
Phoenix, AZ
—
(4,013
)
120
—
Tucson, AZ
(5)
—
—
(417
)
—
Ft. Myers, FL
570,000
—
469
14,112
Miami, FL
850,000
—
3,632
30,876
Orlando, FL
418,000
(5,926
)
917
11,120
Tampa, FL
32,000
(2,153
)
32
1,560
Atlanta, GA
196,000
—
1,207
1,207
Jackson, MS
28,000
—
—
706
Charlotte, NC
655,000
(4,046
)
1,472
6,729
Austin, TX
180,000
(3,100
)
6,120
3,020
Dallas, TX
491,000
(3,701
)
975
9,596
El Paso, TX
(6)
—
—
(2,444
)
—
Houston, TX
(7)
1,476,000
—
(184
)
21,190
San Antonio, TX
965,000
(2,131
)
7,585
11,393
Total Prospective Development
5,861,000
(25,070
)
19,484
111,509
8,027,000
$
—
93,395
242,014
COMPLETED DEVELOPMENT AND TRANSFERRED TO REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES DURING 2017
Building Size (Square feet)
Building Conversion Date
Eisenhauer Point 1 & 2, San Antonio, TX
201,000
$
—
19
15,795
01/17
South 35th Avenue, Phoenix, AZ
(8)
125,000
—
—
1,664
01/17
Alamo Ridge III, San Antonio, TX
135,000
—
28
10,587
02/17
Parc North 1-4, Dallas, TX
(9)
446,000
—
132
32,252
02/17
Madison IV & V, Tampa, FL
145,000
—
549
8,074
03/17
Jones Corporate Park, Las Vegas, NV
(10)
416,000
—
275
39,815
04/17
Steele Creek VI, Charlotte, NC
137,000
—
519
7,525
04/17
Ten Sky Harbor, Phoenix, AZ
64,000
—
100
5,365
04/17
Horizon V, Orlando, FL
141,000
—
4,814
9,249
05/17
Horizon VII, Orlando, FL
109,000
—
1,375
8,266
06/17
Eisenhauer Point 4, San Antonio, TX
85,000
—
2,544
5,197
07/17
CreekView 121 1 & 2, Dallas, TX
193,000
—
4,464
16,319
08/17
Total Transferred to Real Estate Properties
2,197,000
$
—
14,819
160,108
(11)
Footnotes for the Development Activity table are on the following page.
58
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1)
Represents costs transferred from Prospective Development (primarily land) to Under Construction during the period. Negative amounts represent land inventory costs transferred to Under Construction.
(2)
Included in these costs are development obligations of
$29.0 million
and tenant improvement obligations of
$5.8 million
on properties under development.
(3)
This project was acquired by EastGroup on 11/1/16 and underwent redevelopment.
(4)
This project was acquired by EastGroup on 12/12/17 during the lease-up phase.
(5)
Negative amount represents land inventory costs transferred to Real Estate Properties for storage yard and parking lot expansion.
(6)
Negative amount represents land sold on 11/3/17.
(7)
Negative amount represents West Road retention ponds and infrastructure conveyed to West Harris County Municipal Utility District.
(8)
This property was redeveloped from a manufacturing building to a multi-tenant distribution building.
(9)
This project was acquired by EastGroup on 7/8/16 during the lease-up phase.
(10)
This project was acquired by EastGroup on 11/15/16 during the lease-up phase.
(11)
Represents cumulative costs at the date of transfer.
Future Minimum Rental Receipts Under Non-Cancelable Leases
The following schedule indicates approximate future minimum rental receipts under non-cancelable leases for real estate properties by year as of
December 31, 2017
:
Years Ending December 31,
(In thousands)
2018
$
204,614
2019
177,110
2020
139,791
2021
100,559
2022
74,092
Thereafter
147,960
Total minimum receipts
$
844,126
Ground Leases
As of
December 31, 2017
, the Company owned
two
properties in Florida,
two
properties in Texas and
one
property in Arizona that are subject to ground leases. These leases have terms of
40
to
50
years, expiration dates of August 2031 to November 2037, and renewal options of
15
to
35
years, except for the one lease in Arizona which is automatically and perpetually renewed annually. Total ground lease expenditures for the years ended
December 31, 2017
,
2016
and
2015
were
$760,000
,
$756,000
and
$756,000
, respectively. Payments are subject to increases at
3
to
10
year intervals based upon the agreed or appraised fair market value of the leased premises on the adjustment date or the Consumer Price Index percentage increase since the base rent date. The following schedule indicates approximate future minimum ground lease payments for these properties by year as of
December 31, 2017
:
Future Minimum Ground Lease Payments
Years Ending December 31,
(In thousands)
2018
$
761
2019
761
2020
761
2021
761
2022
761
Thereafter
9,729
Total minimum payments
$
13,534
(3)
UNCONSOLIDATED INVESTMENT
The Company owns a
50%
undivided tenant-in-common interest in Industry Distribution Center II, a
309,000
square foot warehouse distribution building in the City of Industry (Los Angeles), California. The building was constructed in
1998
and is
100%
leased through December 2018 to a single tenant who owns the other
50%
interest in the property. This investment is accounted for under the equity method of accounting and had a carrying value of
$8,029,000
at December 31,
2017
, and
$7,681,000
at December 31,
2016
.
59
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(4)
MORTGAGE LOANS RECEIVABLE
As of December 31, 2016, the Company had
two
mortgage loans receivable, both of which were classified as first mortgage loans, with effective interest rates of
5.25%
and maturity dates in
October 2017
. During 2017, the loan agreements were amended and restated. As of December 31, 2017, EastGroup had
two
mortgage loans receivable, both of which were classified as first mortgage loans, with effective interest rates of
5.15%
and maturity dates in
December 2022
. Mortgage loans receivable are included in
Other assets
on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 5 for a summary of
Other assets
.
(5)
OTHER ASSETS
A summary of the Company’s
Other assets
follows:
December 31,
2017
2016
(In thousands)
Leasing costs (principally commissions)
$
72,722
65,521
Accumulated amortization of leasing costs
(27,973
)
(26,340
)
Leasing costs (principally commissions), net of accumulated amortization
44,749
39,181
Straight-line rents receivable
31,609
28,369
Allowance for doubtful accounts on straight-line rents receivable
(48
)
(76
)
Straight-line rents receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
31,561
28,293
Accounts receivable
6,004
6,824
Allowance for doubtful accounts on accounts receivable
(577
)
(809
)
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
5,427
6,015
Acquired in-place lease intangibles
20,690
21,231
Accumulated amortization of acquired in-place lease intangibles
(8,974
)
(8,642
)
Acquired in-place lease intangibles, net of accumulated amortization
11,716
12,589
Acquired above market lease intangibles
1,550
1,594
Accumulated amortization of acquired above market lease intangibles
(794
)
(736
)
Acquired above market lease intangibles, net of accumulated amortization
756
858
Mortgage loans receivable
4,581
4,752
Interest rate swap assets
6,034
4,546
Goodwill
990
990
Prepaid expenses and other assets
11,490
7,606
Total
Other assets
$
117,304
104,830
60
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(6)
UNSECURED BANK CREDIT FACILITIES
EastGroup has a
$300 million
unsecured revolving credit facility with a group of
nine
banks that matures in July 2019. The credit facility contains options for a
one
-year extension (at the Company's election) and a
$150 million
expansion (with agreement by all parties). The interest rate on each tranche is usually reset on a monthly basis and as of
December 31, 2017
, was LIBOR plus
100
basis points with an annual facility fee of
20
basis points. The margin and facility fee are subject to changes in the Company's credit ratings. The Company has designated an interest rate swap to an
$80 million
unsecured bank credit facility draw that effectively fixes the interest rate on the $80 million draw to
2.020%
through the interest rate swap's maturity date of August 15, 2018. As of
December 31, 2017
, EastGroup had an additional
$110,000,000
of variable rate borrowings on this unsecured bank credit facility with a weighted average interest rate of
2.528%
. The Company has a standby letter of credit of
$674,000
pledged on this facility.
The Company also has a
$35 million
unsecured revolving credit facility that matures in July 2019. This credit facility automatically extends for
one
year if the extension option in the $300 million revolving credit facility is exercised. The interest rate is reset on a daily basis and as of
December 31, 2017
, was LIBOR plus
100
basis points with an annual facility fee of
20
basis points. The margin and facility fee are subject to changes in the Company's credit ratings. At
December 31, 2017
, the interest rate was
2.564%
on a balance of
$6,339,000
.
Average unsecured bank credit facilities borrowings were
$114,751,000
in
2017
,
$106,352,000
in
2016
and
$109,777,000
in
2015
, with weighted average interest rates (excluding amortization of facility fees and debt issuance costs) of
2.07%
in
2017
,
1.49%
in
2016
and
1.29%
in
2015
. Amortization of facility fees was
$670,000
,
$670,000
and
$608,000
for
2017
,
2016
and
2015
, respectively. Amortization of debt issuance costs for the Company's unsecured bank credit facilities was
$451,000
,
$450,000
and
$493,000
for
2017
,
2016
and
2015
, respectively.
The Company’s unsecured bank credit facilities have certain restrictive covenants, such as maintaining debt service coverage and leverage ratios and maintaining insurance coverage, and the Company was in compliance with all of its financial debt covenants at
December 31, 2017
.
See Note 7 for a detail of the outstanding balances of the Company's
Unsecured bank credit facilities
as of
December 31, 2017
and 2016.
(7)
UNSECURED AND SECURED DEBT
The Company's debt is detailed below. EastGroup presents debt issuance costs as reductions of
Unsecured bank credit facilities, Unsecured debt and Secured debt
on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as detailed below.
December 31,
2017
December 31,
2016
(In thousands)
Unsecured bank credit facilities - variable rate, carrying amount
$
116,339
112,020
Unsecured bank credit facilities - fixed rate, carrying amount
(1)
80,000
80,000
Unamortized debt issuance costs
(630
)
(1,030
)
Unsecured bank credit facilities
195,709
190,990
Unsecured debt - fixed rate, carrying amount
(1)
715,000
655,000
Unamortized debt issuance costs
(1,939
)
(2,162
)
Unsecured debt
713,061
652,838
Secured debt - fixed rate, carrying amount
(1)
200,354
258,594
Unamortized debt issuance costs
(842
)
(1,089
)
Secured debt
199,512
257,505
Total debt
$
1,108,282
1,101,333
(1)
These loans have a fixed interest rate or an effectively fixed interest rate due to interest rate swaps.
61
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
A summary of the carrying amount of
Unsecured debt
follows:
Balance at December 31,
Margin Above LIBOR
Interest Rate
Maturity Date
2017
2016
(In thousands)
$50 Million Unsecured Term Loan
Not applicable
3.910%
12/21/2018
$
50,000
50,000
$75 Million Unsecured Term Loan
(1)
1.150%
2.846%
07/31/2019
75,000
75,000
$75 Million Unsecured Term Loan
(1)
1.100%
3.452%
12/20/2020
75,000
75,000
$40 Million Unsecured Term Loan
(1)
1.100%
2.335%
07/30/2021
40,000
40,000
$75 Million Unsecured Term Loan
(1)
1.400%
3.031%
02/28/2022
75,000
75,000
$65 Million Unsecured Term Loan
(1)
1.650%
2.863%
04/01/2023
65,000
65,000
$100 Million Senior Unsecured Notes:
$30 Million Notes
Not applicable
3.800%
08/28/2020
30,000
30,000
$50 Million Notes
Not applicable
3.800%
08/28/2023
50,000
50,000
$20 Million Notes
Not applicable
3.800%
08/28/2025
20,000
20,000
$60 Million Senior Unsecured Notes
Not applicable
3.460%
12/13/2024
60,000
—
$100 Million Senior Unsecured Notes:
$60 Million Notes
Not applicable
3.480%
12/15/2024
60,000
60,000
$40 Million Notes
Not applicable
3.750%
12/15/2026
40,000
40,000
$25 Million Senior Unsecured Notes
Not applicable
3.970%
10/01/2025
25,000
25,000
$50 Million Senior Unsecured Notes
Not applicable
3.990%
10/07/2025
50,000
50,000
$
715,000
655,000
(1)
The interest rates on these unsecured term loans are comprised of LIBOR plus a margin which is subject to a pricing grid for changes in the Company's coverage ratings. The Company entered into interest rate swap agreements (further described in Note 13) to convert the loans' LIBOR rates to effectively fixed interest rates. The interest rates in the table above are the effectively fixed interest rates for the loans, including the effects of the interest rate swaps, as of
December 31, 2017
.
The Company’s unsecured debt instruments have certain restrictive covenants, such as maintaining debt service coverage and leverage ratios and maintaining insurance coverage, and the Company was in compliance with all of its financial debt covenants at
December 31, 2017
.
A summary of the carrying amount of
Secured debt
follows:
Interest Rate
Monthly
P&I
Payment
Maturity
Date
Carrying Amount
of Securing
Real Estate at
December 31, 2017
Balance at December 31,
Property
2017
2016
(In thousands)
Arion 16, Broadway VI, Chino, East
University I & II, Northpark, Santan 10 II, 55
th
Avenue and World Houston 1 & 2, 21 & 23
5.57%
518,885
Repaid
$
—
—
47,496
Dominguez, Industry I & III, Kingsview, Shaw,
Walnut and Washington
7.50%
539,747
05/05/2019
45,886
49,580
52,231
Blue Heron II
5.39%
16,176
02/29/2020
4,425
409
576
40
th
Avenue, Beltway Crossing V, Centennial Park,
Executive Airport, Interchange Park I, Ocean View, Wetmore 5-8 and World Houston 26, 28, 29 & 30
4.39%
463,778
01/05/2021
67,796
55,317
58,380
Colorado Crossing, Interstate I-III, Rojas, Steele
Creek 1 & 2, Venture and World Houston 3-9
4.75%
420,045
06/05/2021
56,000
50,161
52,752
Arion 18, Beltway Crossing VI & VII, Commerce
Park II & III, Concord, Interstate V-VII, Lakeview, Ridge Creek II, Southridge IV & V and World Houston 32
4.09%
329,796
01/05/2022
56,440
42,315
44,493
Ramona
3.85%
16,287
11/30/2026
9,027
2,572
2,666
$
239,574
200,354
258,594
62
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Company currently intends to repay its debt obligations, both in the short-term and long-term, through its operating cash flows, borrowings under its unsecured bank credit facilities, proceeds from new debt (primarily unsecured), and/or proceeds from the issuance of equity instruments.
Principal payments on long-term debt, including
Unsecured debt
and
Secured debt
(not including
Unsecured bank credit facilities
), due during the next five years as of
December 31, 2017
are as follows:
Years Ending December 31,
(In thousands)
2018
$
61,314
2019
130,569
2020
114,096
2021
129,563
2022
107,769
(8)
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES
A summary of the Company’s
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
follows:
December 31,
2017
2016
(In thousands)
Property taxes payable
$
12,081
14,186
Development costs payable
9,699
9,844
Real estate improvements and capitalized leasing costs payable
3,957
2,304
Interest payable
3,744
3,822
Dividends payable on unvested restricted stock
1,365
1,530
Book overdraft
(1)
20,902
14,452
Other payables and accrued expenses
13,219
6,563
Total
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
$
64,967
52,701
(1)
Represents unfunded outstanding checks for which the bank has not advanced cash to the Company. See Note 1(p).
(9)
OTHER LIABILITIES
A summary of the Company’s
Other liabilities
follows:
December 31,
2017
2016
(In thousands)
Security deposits
$
16,668
14,782
Prepaid rent and other deferred income
9,352
9,795
Acquired below-market lease intangibles
4,135
4,012
Accumulated amortization of below-market lease intangibles
(2,147
)
(1,662
)
Acquired below-market lease intangibles, net of accumulated amortization
1,988
2,350
Interest rate swap liabilities
695
2,578
Prepaid tenant improvement reimbursements
124
343
Other liabilities
15
16
Total
Other liabilities
$
28,842
29,864
63
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(10)
COMMON STOCK ACTIVITY
The following table presents the common stock activity for the three years ended
December 31, 2017
:
Years Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
Common Shares
Shares outstanding at beginning of year
33,332,213
32,421,460
32,232,587
Common stock offerings
1,370,457
875,052
106,751
Dividend reinvestment plan
2,744
3,326
4,536
Incentive restricted stock granted
93,285
80,529
100,622
Incentive restricted stock forfeited
(16,000
)
(910
)
—
Director common stock awarded
8,881
10,072
9,373
Director restricted stock granted
282
—
—
Restricted stock withheld for tax obligations
(33,695
)
(57,316
)
(32,409
)
Shares outstanding at end of year
34,758,167
33,332,213
32,421,460
Common Stock Issuances
The following table presents the common stock issuance activity for the three years ended
December 31, 2017
:
Years Ended December 31,
Number of
Common Shares Issued
Net Proceeds
(In thousands)
2017
1,370,457
$
109,207
2016
875,052
59,283
2015
106,751
6,233
Dividend Reinvestment Plan
The Company has a dividend reinvestment plan that allows stockholders to reinvest cash distributions in new shares of the Company.
(11)
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company applies the provisions of ASC 718,
Compensation – Stock Compensation
, to account for its stock-based compensation plans. ASC 718 requires that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements and that the cost be measured on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued.
Equity Incentive Plan
In May 2004, the stockholders of the Company approved the EastGroup Properties, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”) that authorized the issuance of up to
1,900,000
shares of common stock to employees in the form of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, deferred stock units, performance shares, bonus stock or stock in lieu of cash compensation. The 2004 Plan was further amended by the Board of Directors in September 2005 and December 2006.
In April 2013, the Board of Directors adopted the EastGroup Properties, Inc. 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2013 Equity Plan”) upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee; the 2013 Equity Plan was approved by the Company's stockholders and became effective May 29, 2013. The 2013 Equity Plan was further amended by the Board of Directors in March 2017. The 2013 Equity Plan replaced the 2004 Plan and the 2005 Directors Equity Incentive Plan. The 2013 Equity Plan permits the grant of awards to employees and directors with respect to
2,000,000
shares of common stock.
There were
1,671,981
,
1,752,345
and
1,802,000
total shares available for grant under the 2013 Equity Plan as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Typically, the Company issues new shares to fulfill stock grants.
Stock-based compensation cost for employees was
$6,309,000
,
$5,184,000
and
$7,891,000
for
2017
,
2016
and
2015
, respectively, of which
$1,458,000
,
$1,183,000
and
$1,672,000
were capitalized as part of the Company’s development costs for the respective years.
64
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Employee Equity Awards
The Company's restricted stock program is designed to provide incentives for management to achieve goals established by the Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors (the Committee). The awards act as a retention device, as they vest over time, allowing participants to benefit from dividends on shares as well as potential stock appreciation. Equity awards align management's interests with the long-term interests of shareholders. The vesting periods of the Company’s restricted stock plans vary, as determined by the Compensation Committee. Restricted stock is granted to executive officers subject to both continued service and the satisfaction of certain annual performance goals and multi-year market conditions as determined by the Compensation Committee. Restricted stock is granted to non-executive officers subject only to continued service. The cost for market-based awards and awards that only require service is amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods. The total compensation expense for service and performance based awards is based upon the fair market value of the shares on the grant date.
In March 2017, the Committee evaluated the Company's performance compared to certain annual performance measures (primarily funds from operations (FFO) per share and total shareholder return) for the year ended December 31, 2016. Based on the evaluation,
36,571
shares were awarded to the Company’s executive officers at the grant date (March 2, 2017) fair value of
$74.80
per share. These shares vested
20%
on the date shares were determined and awarded and will vest
20%
per year on January 1 in years 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021. The shares are being expensed on a straight-line basis over the remaining service period.
Also in March 2017, the Committee evaluated the Company’s total shareholder return, both on an absolute basis for 2016 as well as on a relative basis compared to the NAREIT Equity Index, NAREIT Industrial Index and Russell 2000 Index for the five-year period ended December 31, 2016. Based on the evaluation,
33,289
shares were awarded to the Company’s executive officers at the grant date (March 2, 2017) fair value of
$74.80
per share. These shares vested
25%
on the date shares were determined and awarded and will vest
25%
per year on January 1 in years 2018, 2019 and 2020. The shares are being expensed on a straight-line basis over the remaining service period.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the shares issued to the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer under these plans became fully vested on the grant date of the awards in the first quarter of 2017.
In the second quarter of 2017, the Committee approved an equity compensation plan for certain of its executive officers based upon certain annual performance measures for 2017, including FFO per share, same property net operating income change, general and administrative costs, and fixed charge coverage. During the first quarter of 2018, the Committee will measure the Company's performance for 2017 against bright-line tests established by the Committee on the grant date of May 10, 2017. The number of shares that may be earned for the achievement of the annual performance measures could range from
zero
to
21,096
. These shares, which have a grant date fair value of
$78.18
, would vest
20%
on the date shares are determined and
20%
per year on each January 1 for the subsequent four years. On the grant date of May 10, 2017, the Company began recognizing expense for its estimate of the shares that may be earned pursuant to these awards; the shares are being expensed using the graded vesting attribution method which recognizes each separate vesting portion of the award as a separate award on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.
Also in the second quarter of 2017, the Committee approved an equity compensation plan for certain of its executive officers based upon the achievement of individual goals for each of the officers included in the plan. Any shares issued pursuant to the individual goals in this compensation plan will be determined by the Committee in its discretion and issued in the first quarter of 2018. The number of shares to be issued on the grant date for the achievement of individual goals could range from
zero
to
5,274
. These shares would vest
20%
on the date shares are determined and awarded and
20%
per year on each January 1 for the subsequent four years. The Company will begin recognizing the expense for any shares awarded on the grant date in the first quarter of 2018, and the shares will be expensed on a straight-line basis over the remaining service period.
Also in the second quarter of 2017, the Committee approved a long-term equity compensation plan for certain of the Company’s executive officers that includes
three
components based on total shareholder return and
one
component based only on continued service as of the vesting dates.
The three long-term equity compensation plan components based on total shareholder return are subject to bright-line tests that will compare the Company's total shareholder return to the NAREIT Equity Index and to the Company's industrial REIT peer group. The first plan will measure the bright-line tests over the one-year period ending December 31, 2017. During the first quarter of 2018, the Committee will measure the Company's performance for the
one
-year period against bright-line tests established by the Committee on the grant date of May 10, 2017. The number of shares to be earned on the measurement date could range from
zero
to
4,730
. These shares would vest
100%
on the date the earned shares are determined. On the grant date of May 10, 2017, the Company began recognizing expense for this plan based on the grant date fair value of the awards which was determined using a simulation pricing model developed to specifically accommodate the unique features of the award.
65
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The second plan will measure the bright-line tests over the
two
-year period ending December 31, 2018. During the first quarter of 2019, the Committee will measure the Company's performance for the two-year period against bright-line tests established by the Committee on the grant date of May 10, 2017. The number of shares to be earned on the measurement date could range from
zero
to
9,460
. These shares would vest
100%
on the date the earned shares are determined. On the grant date of May 10, 2017, the Company began recognizing expense for this plan based on the grant date fair value of the awards which was determined using a simulation pricing model developed to specifically accommodate the unique features of the award.
The third plan will measure the bright-line tests over the
three
-year period ending December 31, 2019. During the first quarter of 2020, the Committee will measure the Company's performance for the three-year period against bright-line tests established by the Committee on the grant date of May 10, 2017. The number of shares to be earned on the measurement date could range from
zero
to
18,917
. These shares would vest
75%
on the date the earned shares are determined in the first quarter of 2020 and
25%
on January 1, 2021. On the grant date of May 10, 2017, the Company began recognizing expense for this plan based on the grant date fair value of the awards which was determined using a simulation pricing model developed to specifically accommodate the unique features of the award.
The component of the long-term equity compensation plan based only on continued service as of the vesting dates was awarded on May 10, 2017. On that date,
5,406
shares were granted to certain executive officers subject only to continued service as of the vesting dates. These shares, which have a grant date fair value of
$78.18
per share, will vest
25%
in the first quarter of 2018 and
25%
on January 1 in years 2019, 2020 and 2021. The shares are being expensed on a straight-line basis over the remaining service period.
Also during the second quarter of 2017,
5,169
shares were granted to certain executive officers subject only to continued service as of the vesting dates. These shares, which have a weighted average grant date fair value of
$81.27
per share, vested
20%
on January 1, 2018, and will vest
20%
per year on January 1 in years 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022.
The shares are being expensed on a straight-line basis over the remaining service period.
Also during the second quarter of 2017,
12,850
shares were granted to certain non-executive officers subject only to continued service as of the vesting dates. These shares, which have a grant date fair value of
$84.57
per share, vested
20%
on January 1, 2018, and will vest
20%
per year on January 1 in years 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022.
The shares are being expensed on a straight-line basis over the remaining service period.
During the restricted period for awards no longer subject to contingencies, the Company accrues dividends and holds the certificates for the shares; however, the employee can vote the shares. For shares subject to contingencies, dividends are accrued based upon the number of shares expected to be awarded. Share certificates and dividends are delivered to the employee as they vest. As of
December 31, 2017
, there was
$5,988,000
of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock compensation for employees and directors that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
2.7
years.
Following is a summary of the total restricted shares granted, forfeited and delivered (vested) to employees with the related weighted average grant date fair value share prices for
2017
,
2016
and
2015
. Of the shares that vested in
2017
,
2016
and
2015
,
33,695
shares,
57,316
shares and
32,409
shares, respectively, were withheld by the Company to satisfy the tax obligations for those employees who elected this option as permitted under the applicable equity plan. As of the grant date, the fair value of shares that were granted during
2017
,
2016
and
2015
was
$7,155,000
,
$4,736,000
and
$6,145,000
, respectively. As of the vesting date, the fair value of shares that vested during
2017
,
2016
and
2015
was
$6,441,000
,
$10,013,000
and
$6,664,000
, respectively.
Restricted Stock Activity:
Years Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
Shares
Weighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Shares
Weighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Shares
Weighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Unvested at beginning of year
162,087
$
51.97
260,698
$
52.68
265,911
$
49.79
Granted
(1)
93,285
76.70
80,529
58.81
100,622
61.07
Forfeited
(16,000
)
36.98
(910
)
52.89
—
—
Vested
(86,728
)
61.62
(178,230
)
56.09
(105,835
)
53.40
Unvested at end of year
152,644
63.18
162,087
51.97
260,698
52.68
(1)
Does not include the restricted shares that may be earned if the performance goals established in 2017 for annual and long-term performance periods are achieved. Depending on the actual level of achievement of the goals at the end of the open performance periods, the number of shares earned could range from
zero
to
59,477
.
66
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Following is a vesting schedule of the total unvested shares as of December 31,
2017
:
Unvested Shares Vesting Schedule
Number of Shares
2018
50,158
2019
44,235
2020
41,064
2021
13,584
2022
3,603
Total Unvested Shares
152,644
Directors Equity Awards
The Company has a directors equity plan that was approved by stockholders and adopted in 2013 (the "2013 Equity Plan"). The Board of Directors has adopted a policy under the 2013 Equity Plan pursuant to which awards will be made to non-employee Directors. The current policy provides that the Company shall automatically award an annual retainer share award to each non-employee Director who has been elected or reelected as a member of the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting. The number of shares shall be equal to
$80,000
divided by the fair market value of a share on the date of such election. If a non-employee Director is elected or appointed to the Board of Directors other than at an Annual Meeting of the Company, the annual retainer share award shall be pro rated. The policy also provides that each new non-employee Director appointed or elected will receive an automatic award of restricted shares of Common Stock on the effective date of election or appointment equal to
$25,000
divided by the fair market value of the Company's Common Stock on such date. These restricted shares will vest over a
four
-year period upon the performance of future service as a Director, subject to certain exceptions.
Directors were issued
8,881
shares,
10,072
shares and
9,373
shares of common stock as annual retainer awards for
2017
,
2016
and
2015
, respectively.
During the third quarter of 2017,
282
shares were granted to a newly elected non-employee Director subject only to continued service as of the vesting date. The shares, which have a grant date fair value of
$88.86
per share, will vest
25%
per year on September 8 in years 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021. The shares are being expensed on a straight-line basis over the remaining service period.
During 2013,
417
shares were granted to a newly elected non-employee Director subject only to continued service as of the vesting date. The shares, which have a grant date fair value of
$59.97
per share, vested
25%
on each of December 6, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017.
As of the vesting date, the fair value of shares that vested during
2017
,
2016
and
2015
was
$9,000
,
$8,000
and
$6,000
, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense for directors was
$670,000
,
$589,000
and
$514,000
for
2017
,
2016
and
2015
, respectively.
(12)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Total Comprehensive Income
is comprised of net income plus all other changes in equity from non-owner sources and is presented on the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. The components of
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
for
2017
,
2016
and
2015
are presented in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity and are summarized below. See Note 13 for information regarding the Company’s interest rate swaps.
Years Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS):
(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of year
$
1,995
(3,456
)
(2,357
)
Change in fair value of interest rate swaps - cash flow hedges
3,353
5,451
(1,099
)
Balance at end of year
$
5,348
1,995
(3,456
)
67
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(13)
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
The Company is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Company manages economic risk, including interest rate, liquidity and credit risk primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of its debt funding and, to a limited extent, the use of derivative instruments.
Specifically, the Company has entered into derivative instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. The Company's derivative instruments, described below, are used to manage differences in the amount, timing and duration of the Company's known or expected cash payments principally related to certain of the Company's borrowings.
The Company's objective in using interest rate derivatives is to change variable interest rates to fixed interest rates by using interest rate swaps. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount.
As of
December 31, 2017
, EastGroup had
seven
interest rate swaps outstanding, all of which are used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with unsecured loans. All of the Company's interest rate swaps convert the related loans' LIBOR rate components to effectively fixed interest rates, and the Company has concluded that each of the hedging relationships is highly effective.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges is recorded in
Other comprehensive income (loss)
and is subsequently reclassified into earnings through interest expense as interest payments are made in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives, which is immaterial for the periods reported, is recognized directly in earnings (included in
Other
on the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income).
Amounts reported in
Other comprehensive income (loss)
related to derivatives will be reclassified to
Interest expense
as interest payments are made or received on the Company's variable-rate debt. The Company estimates the swap interest receipts will be
$617,000
over the next twelve months. These receipts approximate the expected cash interest receipts due from counterparties for the swaps. Since the interest payments and receipts on the swaps in combination with the associated debt have been effectively fixed, this estimate is not in addition to the Company's total expected combined interest payments or expense for the next twelve months.
The Company's valuation methodology for over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives is to discount cash flows based on Overnight Index Swap (“OIS”) rates. Uncollateralized or partially-collateralized trades are discounted at OIS, but include appropriate economic adjustments for funding costs (i.e., a LIBOR-OIS basis adjustment to approximate uncollateralized cost of funds) and credit risk. The Company calculates its derivative values using mid-market prices.
As of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
, the Company had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk:
Interest Rate Derivative
Notional Amount as of December 31, 2017
Notional Amount as of December 31, 2016
(In thousands)
Interest Rate Swap
$80,000
$80,000
Interest Rate Swap
$75,000
$75,000
Interest Rate Swap
$75,000
$75,000
Interest Rate Swap
$65,000
$65,000
Interest Rate Swap
$60,000
$60,000
Interest Rate Swap
$40,000
$40,000
Interest Rate Swap
$15,000
$15,000
The table below presents the fair value of the Company's derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
December 31, 2017
and
2016
. See Note 18 for additional information on the fair value of the Company's interest rate swaps.
68
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Derivatives
As of December 31, 2017
Derivatives
As of December 31, 2016
Balance Sheet Location
Fair Value
Balance Sheet Location
Fair Value
(In thousands)
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:
Interest rate swap assets
Other assets
$
6,034
Other assets
$
4,546
Interest rate swap liabilities
Other liabilities
695
Other liabilities
2,578
The table below presents the effect of the Company's derivative financial instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the years ended
December 31, 2017
,
2016
and
2015
:
Years Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
(In thousands)
DERIVATIVES IN CASH FLOW HEDGING RELATIONSHIPS
Interest Rate Swaps:
Amount of income (loss) recognized in
Other comprehensive income (loss)
on derivatives
$
1,437
1,410
(5,374
)
Amount of loss reclassified from
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
into
Interest expense
1,916
4,041
4,275
See Note 12 for additional information on the Company's
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
resulting from its interest rate swaps.
Derivative financial agreements expose the Company to credit risk in the event of non-performance by the counterparties under the terms of the interest rate hedge agreements. The Company believes it minimizes the credit risk by transacting with financial institutions the Company regards as credit-worthy.
The Company has an agreement with its derivative counterparties containing a provision stating that the Company could be declared in default on its derivative obligations if the Company defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender.
As of
December 31, 2017
, the fair value of derivatives in an asset position related to these agreements was
$6,034,000
, and the fair value of derivatives in a liability position related to these agreements was
$695,000
. As of
December 31, 2017
, the Company has not posted any collateral related to these arrangements. If the Company had breached any of the contractual provisions of the derivative contract, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at their termination value. The swap termination value of derivatives in an asset position was an asset in the amount of
$6,084,000
, and the swap termination value of derivatives in a liability position was a liability in the amount of
$717,000
.
69
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(14)
EARNINGS PER SHARE
The Company applies ASC 260,
Earnings Per Share
, which requires companies to present basic and diluted EPS. Reconciliation of the numerators and denominators in the basic and diluted EPS computations is as follows:
2017
2016
2015
(In thousands)
BASIC EPS COMPUTATION FOR NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
Numerator – net income attributable to common stockholders
$
83,183
95,509
47,866
Denominator – weighted average shares outstanding
33,996
32,563
32,091
DILUTED EPS COMPUTATION FOR NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE
TO EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
Numerator – net income attributable to common stockholders
$
83,183
95,509
47,866
Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding
33,996
32,563
32,091
Unvested restricted stock
51
65
105
Total Shares
34,047
32,628
32,196
(15)
QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – UNAUDITED
2017 Quarter Ended
2016 Quarter Ended
Mar 31
Jun 30
Sep 30
Dec 31
Mar 31
Jun 30
Sep 30
Dec 31
(In thousands, except per share data)
Revenues
$
66,409
90,004
69,001
71,944
73,189
93,279
64,043
66,614
Expenses
(53,436
)
(53,027
)
(53,029
)
(54,277
)
(51,359
)
(49,186
)
(49,243
)
(51,243
)
Net Income
12,973
36,977
15,972
17,667
21,830
44,093
14,800
15,371
Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interest in joint ventures
(154
)
(87
)
(88
)
(77
)
(119
)
(180
)
(139
)
(147
)
Net income attributable to EastGroup
Properties, Inc. common stockholders
$
12,819
36,890
15,884
17,590
21,711
43,913
14,661
15,224
BASIC PER SHARE DATA FOR NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
(1)
Net income attributable to common
stockholders
$
0.38
1.09
0.46
0.51
0.67
1.36
0.45
0.46
Weighted average shares outstanding
33,361
33,987
34,215
34,406
32,254
32,376
32,741
32,874
DILUTED PER SHARE DATA FOR NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
(1)
Net income attributable to common
stockholders
$
0.38
1.08
0.46
0.51
0.67
1.35
0.45
0.46
Weighted average shares outstanding
33,409
34,040
34,290
34,505
32,307
32,440
32,823
32,964
(1)
The above quarterly earnings per share calculations are based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each quarter for basic earnings per share and the weighted average number of outstanding common shares and common share equivalents during each quarter for diluted earnings per share. The annual earnings per share calculations in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income are based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each year for basic earnings per share and the weighted average number of outstanding common shares and common share equivalents during each year for diluted earnings per share. The sum of quarterly financial data may vary from the annual data due to rounding.
70
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(16)
DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN
EastGroup maintains a 401(k) plan for its employees. The Company makes matching contributions of
50%
of the employee’s contribution (limited to
10%
of compensation as defined by the plan) and may also make annual discretionary contributions. The Company’s total expense for this plan was
$672,000
,
$675,000
and
$585,000
for
2017
,
2016
and
2015
, respectively.
(17)
LEGAL MATTERS
The Company is not presently involved in any material litigation nor, to its knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against the Company or its properties, other than routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business and for which the Company is adequately insured.
(18)
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
ASC 820,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,
defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 also provides guidance for using fair value to measure financial assets and liabilities. The Codification requires disclosure of the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, including measurements using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1), quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active (Level 2), and significant valuation assumptions that are not readily observable in the market (Level 3).
The following table presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments in accordance with ASC 820
at December 31,
2017
and
2016
.
December 31,
2017
2016
Carrying
Amount
(1)
Fair
Value
Carrying
Amount
(1)
Fair
Value
(In thousands)
Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
16
16
522
522
Mortgage loans receivable
4,581
4,569
4,752
4,747
Interest rate swap assets
6,034
6,034
4,546
4,546
Financial Liabilities:
Unsecured bank credit facilities - variable rate
(2)
116,339
116,277
112,020
111,923
Unsecured bank credit facilities - fixed rate
(2)
80,000
80,003
80,000
79,998
Unsecured debt
(2)
715,000
703,871
655,000
623,147
Secured debt
(2)
200,354
206,408
258,594
266,585
Interest rate swap liabilities
695
695
2,578
2,578
(1)
Carrying amounts shown in the table are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets under the indicated captions, except as indicated in the notes below.
(2)
Carrying amounts and fair values shown in the table exclude debt issuance costs (see Notes 6 and 7 for additional information).
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents:
The carrying amounts approximate fair value due to the short maturity of those instruments.
Mortgage loans receivable (included in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets):
The fair value is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities (Level 2 input).
Interest rate swap assets (included in Other assets on the Consolidated Balances Sheets):
The instruments are recorded at fair value based on models using inputs, such as interest rate yield curves, LIBOR swap curves and OIS curves, observable for substantially the full term of the contract (Level 2 input). See Note 13 for additional information on the Company's interest rate swaps.
71
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Unsecured bank credit facilities:
The fair value of the Company’s unsecured bank credit facilities is estimated by discounting expected cash flows at current market rates (Level 2 input), excluding the effects of debt issuance costs.
Unsecured debt:
The fair value of the Company’s unsecured debt is estimated by discounting expected cash flows at the rates currently offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities, as advised by the Company’s bankers (Level 2 input), excluding the effects of debt issuance costs.
Secured debt:
The fair value of the Company’s secured debt is estimated by discounting expected cash flows at the rates currently offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities, as advised by the Company’s bankers (Level 2 input), excluding the effects of debt issuance costs.
Interest rate swap liabilities (included in Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets):
The instruments are recorded at fair value based on models using inputs, such as interest rate yield curves, LIBOR swap curves and OIS curves, observable for substantially the full term of the contract (Level 2 input). See Note 13 for additional information on the Company's interest rate swaps.
(19)
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On
January 26, 2018
, EastGroup closed the sale of World Houston 18, a
33,000
square foot, non-EastGroup developed, single-tenant building in Houston, for
$2.5 million
. The transaction generated a gain on sale which will be recognized in the first quarter of 2018.
Subsequent to December 31, 2017, the Company executed a commitment letter for
$60 million
of senior unsecured private placement notes with an insurance company. The notes, which are expected to close in April 2018, have a
10
-year term and a fixed interest rate of
3.93%
with semi-annual interest payments. The notes will not be and have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements.
72
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 2017
(In thousands, except footnotes)
Description
Encumbrances
Initial Cost to the Company
Costs
Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
Accumulated Depreciation
Year Acquired
Year Constructed
Land
Buildings and Improvements
Land
Buildings and Improvements
Total
Real Estate Properties (c):
Industrial:
FLORIDA
Tampa
56th Street Commerce Park
$
—
843
3,567
4,527
843
8,094
8,937
6,129
1993
1981/86/97
Jetport Commerce Park
—
1,575
6,591
5,899
1,575
12,490
14,065
8,545
1993-99
1974-85
Westport Commerce Center
—
980
3,800
2,765
980
6,565
7,545
4,628
1994
1983/87
Benjamin Distribution Center I & II
—
843
3,963
1,572
883
5,495
6,378
3,788
1997
1996
Benjamin Distribution Center III
—
407
1,503
650
407
2,153
2,560
1,559
1999
1988
Palm River Center
—
1,190
4,625
2,585
1,190
7,210
8,400
4,763
1997/98
1990/97/98
Palm River North I & III
—
1,005
4,688
2,404
1,005
7,092
8,097
4,234
1998
2000
Palm River North II
—
634
4,418
399
634
4,817
5,451
3,399
1997/98
1999
Palm River South I
—
655
3,187
655
655
3,842
4,497
1,823
2000
2005
Palm River South II
—
655
—
4,417
655
4,417
5,072
2,140
2000
2006
Walden Distribution Center I
—
337
3,318
625
337
3,943
4,280
2,111
1997/98
2001
Walden Distribution Center II
—
465
3,738
1,479
465
5,217
5,682
2,788
1998
1998
Oak Creek Distribution Center I
—
1,109
6,126
1,374
1,109
7,500
8,609
4,020
1998
1998
Oak Creek Distribution Center II
—
647
3,603
1,670
647
5,273
5,920
2,514
2003
2001
Oak Creek Distribution Center III
—
439
—
3,196
556
3,079
3,635
1,171
2005
2007
Oak Creek Distribution Center IV
—
682
6,472
773
682
7,245
7,927
2,750
2005
2001
Oak Creek Distribution Center V
—
724
—
5,853
916
5,661
6,577
2,260
2005
2007
Oak Creek Distribution Center VI
—
642
—
5,241
812
5,071
5,883
1,655
2005
2008
Oak Creek Distribution Center VIII
—
843
—
6,230
1,051
6,022
7,073
425
2005
2015
Oak Creek Distribution Center IX
—
618
—
4,963
781
4,800
5,581
1,341
2005
2009
Oak Creek Distribution Center A
—
185
—
1,493
185
1,493
1,678
477
2005
2008
Oak Creek Distribution Center B
—
227
—
1,549
227
1,549
1,776
498
2005
2008
Airport Commerce Center
—
1,257
4,012
937
1,257
4,949
6,206
2,725
1998
1998
Westlake Distribution Center
—
1,333
6,998
2,367
1,333
9,365
10,698
5,409
1998
1998/99
Expressway Commerce Center I
—
915
5,346
1,372
915
6,718
7,633
3,334
2002
2004
Expressway Commerce Center II
—
1,013
3,247
462
1,013
3,709
4,722
1,934
2003
2001
Silo Bend Distribution Center
—
4,131
27,497
1,635
4,132
29,131
33,263
6,071
2011
1987/90
73
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 2017
(In thousands, except footnotes)
Description
Encumbrances
Initial Cost to the Company
Costs
Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
Accumulated Depreciation
Year Acquired
Year Constructed
Land
Buildings and Improvements
Land
Buildings and Improvements
Total
Tampa East Distribution Center
—
791
4,758
513
791
5,271
6,062
1,271
2011
1984
Tampa West Distribution Center
—
2,139
8,502
1,145
2,140
9,646
11,786
2,250
2011
1975/93/94
Madison Distribution Center
—
495
2,779
428
495
3,207
3,702
774
2012
2007
Madison Distribution Center II & III
—
624
—
7,004
624
7,004
7,628
632
2012
2015
Madison Distribution Center IV & V
—
565
—
8,202
565
8,202
8,767
271
2012
2016
Orlando
Chancellor Center
—
291
1,711
476
291
2,187
2,478
1,272
1996/97
1996/97
Exchange Distribution Center I
—
603
2,414
2,275
603
4,689
5,292
3,314
1994
1975
Exchange Distribution Center II
—
300
945
454
300
1,399
1,699
810
2002
1976
Exchange Distribution Center III
—
320
997
403
320
1,400
1,720
903
2002
1980
Sunbelt Distribution Center
—
1,472
5,745
5,901
1,472
11,646
13,118
8,622
1989/97/98
1974/87/97/98
John Young Commerce Center I
—
497
2,444
1,291
497
3,735
4,232
2,082
1997/98
1997/98
John Young Commerce Center II
—
512
3,613
529
512
4,142
4,654
2,632
1998
1999
Altamonte Commerce Center I
—
1,498
2,661
2,675
1,498
5,336
6,834
3,856
1999
1980/82
Altamonte Commerce Center II
—
745
2,618
1,252
745
3,870
4,615
2,212
2003
1975
Sunport Center I
—
555
1,977
1,011
555
2,988
3,543
1,516
1999
1999
Sunport Center II
—
597
3,271
1,872
597
5,143
5,740
3,379
1999
2001
Sunport Center III
—
642
3,121
1,032
642
4,153
4,795
2,194
1999
2002
Sunport Center IV
—
642
2,917
1,804
642
4,721
5,363
2,324
1999
2004
Sunport Center V
—
750
2,509
2,385
750
4,894
5,644
2,694
1999
2005
Sunport Center VI
—
672
—
3,486
672
3,486
4,158
1,358
1999
2006
Southridge Commerce Park I
—
373
—
4,829
373
4,829
5,202
2,805
2003
2006
Southridge Commerce Park II
—
342
—
4,424
342
4,424
4,766
2,195
2003
2007
Southridge Commerce Park III
—
547
—
5,543
547
5,543
6,090
2,118
2003
2007
Southridge Commerce Park IV (h)
2,798
506
—
4,632
506
4,632
5,138
1,842
2003
2006
Southridge Commerce Park V (h)
2,660
382
—
4,502
382
4,502
4,884
2,056
2003
2006
Southridge Commerce Park VI
—
571
—
5,284
571
5,284
5,855
1,879
2003
2007
Southridge Commerce Park VII
—
520
—
6,715
520
6,715
7,235
2,354
2003
2008
Southridge Commerce Park VIII
—
531
—
6,345
531
6,345
6,876
1,902
2003
2008
Southridge Commerce Park IX
—
468
—
6,453
468
6,453
6,921
1,415
2003
2012
Southridge Commerce Park X
—
414
—
4,867
414
4,867
5,281
794
2003
2012
74
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 2017
(In thousands, except footnotes)
Description
Encumbrances
Initial Cost to the Company
Costs
Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
Accumulated Depreciation
Year Acquired
Year Constructed
Land
Buildings and Improvements
Land
Buildings and Improvements
Total
Southridge Commerce Park XI
—
513
—
5,927
513
5,927
6,440
1,123
2003
2012
Southridge Commerce Park XII
—
2,025
—
16,896
2,025
16,896
18,921
4,715
2005
2008
Horizon Commerce Park I
—
991
—
6,519
991
6,519
7,510
898
2008
2014
Horizon Commerce Park II
—
1,111
—
7,197
1,111
7,197
8,308
796
2008
2014
Horizon Commerce Park III
—
991
—
6,471
991
6,471
7,462
490
2008
2016
Horizon Commerce Park IV
—
1,097
—
8,549
1,097
8,549
9,646
663
2008
2015
Horizon Commerce Park V
—
1,108
—
8,590
1,108
8,590
9,698
209
2008
2017
Horizon Commerce Park VII
—
962
—
7,468
961
7,469
8,430
233
2008
2017
Jacksonville
Deerwood Distribution Center
—
1,147
1,799
3,389
1,147
5,188
6,335
3,181
1989
1978
Phillips Distribution Center
—
1,375
2,961
4,414
1,375
7,375
8,750
5,373
1994
1984/95
Lake Pointe Business Park
—
3,442
6,450
8,272
3,442
14,722
18,164
11,091
1993
1986/87
Ellis Distribution Center
—
540
7,513
1,752
540
9,265
9,805
4,770
1997
1977
Westside Distribution Center
—
2,011
15,374
8,211
2,011
23,585
25,596
12,109
1997/2008
1984/85
Beach Commerce Center
—
476
1,899
678
476
2,577
3,053
1,385
2000
2000
Interstate Distribution Center
—
1,879
5,700
1,808
1,879
7,508
9,387
4,012
2005
1990
Flagler Center
—
7,317
14,912
28
7,317
14,940
22,257
675
2016
1997/2005
Ft. Lauderdale/Palm Beach area
Linpro Commerce Center
—
613
2,243
3,049
616
5,289
5,905
3,382
1996
1986
Cypress Creek Business Park
—
—
2,465
1,892
—
4,357
4,357
3,001
1997
1986
Lockhart Distribution Center
—
—
3,489
2,935
—
6,424
6,424
4,291
1997
1986
Interstate Commerce Center
—
485
2,652
836
485
3,488
3,973
2,308
1998
1988
Executive Airport Distribution Ctr (f)
6,915
1,991
4,857
5,265
1,991
10,122
12,113
4,879
2001
2004/06
Sample 95 Business Park
—
2,202
8,785
3,524
2,202
12,309
14,511
7,917
1996/98
1990/99
Blue Heron Distribution Center
—
975
3,626
1,961
975
5,587
6,562
3,572
1999
1986
Blue Heron Distribution Center II
409
1,385
4,222
1,333
1,385
5,555
6,940
2,515
2004
1988
Blue Heron Distribution Center III
—
450
—
2,683
450
2,683
3,133
904
2004
2009
75
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 2017
(In thousands, except footnotes)
Description
Encumbrances
Initial Cost to the Company
Costs
Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
Accumulated Depreciation
Year Acquired
Year Constructed
Land
Buildings and Improvements
Land
Buildings and Improvements
Total
Ft. Myers
SunCoast Commerce Center I
—
911
—
4,809
928
4,792
5,720
1,754
2005
2008
SunCoast Commerce Center II
—
911
—
4,993
928
4,976
5,904
2,005
2005
2007
SunCoast Commerce Center III
—
1,720
—
6,665
1,763
6,622
8,385
2,216
2006
2008
CALIFORNIA
San Francisco area
Wiegman Distribution Center I
—
2,197
8,788
2,105
2,308
10,782
13,090
6,211
1996
1986/87
Wiegman Distribution Center II
—
2,579
4,316
152
2,579
4,468
7,047
695
2012
1998
Huntwood Distribution Center
—
3,842
15,368
3,109
3,842
18,477
22,319
10,819
1996
1988
San Clemente Distribution Center
—
893
2,004
932
893
2,936
3,829
1,846
1997
1978
Yosemite Distribution Center
—
259
7,058
1,344
259
8,402
8,661
4,670
1999
1974/87
Los Angeles area
Kingsview Industrial Center (e)
2,455
643
2,573
892
643
3,465
4,108
1,949
1996
1980
Dominguez Distribution Center (e)
6,693
2,006
8,025
1,170
2,006
9,195
11,201
5,525
1996
1977
Main Street Distribution Center
—
1,606
4,103
831
1,606
4,934
6,540
2,757
1999
1999
Walnut Business Center (e)
6,352
2,885
5,274
2,471
2,885
7,745
10,630
4,113
1996
1966/90
Washington Distribution Center (e)
4,321
1,636
4,900
695
1,636
5,595
7,231
3,133
1997
1996/97
Chino Distribution Center
—
2,544
10,175
1,623
2,544
11,798
14,342
7,929
1998
1980
Ramona Distribution Center
2,572
3,761
5,751
3
3,761
5,754
9,515
488
2014
1984
Industry Distribution Center I (e)
16,148
10,230
12,373
4,418
10,230
16,791
27,021
8,796
1998
1959
Industry Distribution Center III (e)
1,706
—
3,012
(157
)
—
2,855
2,855
2,855
2007
1992
Chestnut Business Center
—
1,674
3,465
284
1,674
3,749
5,423
1,902
1998
1999
Los Angeles Corporate Center
—
1,363
5,453
3,214
1,363
8,667
10,030
5,807
1996
1986
Santa Barbara
University Business Center
—
5,517
22,067
8,225
5,520
30,289
35,809
17,119
1996
1987/88
Fresno
Shaw Commerce Center (e)
11,905
2,465
11,627
5,830
2,465
17,457
19,922
10,711
1998
1978/81/87
76
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 2017
(In thousands, except footnotes)
Description
Encumbrances
Initial Cost to the Company
Costs
Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
Accumulated Depreciation
Year Acquired
Year Constructed
Land
Buildings and Improvements
Land
Buildings and Improvements
Total
San Diego
Eastlake Distribution Center
—
3,046
6,888
1,786
3,046
8,674
11,720
5,279
1997
1989
Ocean View Corporate Center (f)
8,358
6,577
7,105
957
6,577
8,062
14,639
2,638
2010
2005
TEXAS
Dallas
Interstate Warehouse I & II (g)
5,447
1,746
4,941
3,628
1,746
8,569
10,315
6,223
1988
1978
Interstate Warehouse III (g)
2,163
519
2,008
1,570
519
3,578
4,097
2,082
2000
1979
Interstate Warehouse IV
—
416
2,481
535
416
3,016
3,432
1,541
2004
2002
Interstate Warehouse V, VI, & VII (h)
4,424
1,824
4,106
2,190
1,824
6,296
8,120
2,974
2009
1979/80/81
Venture Warehouses (g)
4,155
1,452
3,762
2,654
1,452
6,416
7,868
5,126
1988
1979
ParkView Commerce Center 1-3
—
2,663
—
18,452
2,663
18,452
21,115
998
2014
2015
Shady Trail Distribution Center
—
635
3,621
1,255
635
4,876
5,511
2,397
2003
1998
Valwood Distribution Center
—
4,361
34,405
3,027
4,361
37,432
41,793
7,806
2012
1986/87/97/98
Northfield Distribution Center
—
12,470
50,713
2,973
12,470
53,686
66,156
11,119
2013
1999-2001/03/04/08
Parc North 1-4
—
4,615
26,358
4,482
4,615
30,840
35,455
998
2016
2016
CreekView 121 1 & 2
—
3,275
—
14,568
3,275
14,568
17,843
310
2015/16
2017
Houston
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 1 & 2
—
660
5,893
2,066
660
7,959
8,619
4,714
1998
1996
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 3, 4 & 5 (g)
4,730
1,025
6,413
1,518
1,025
7,931
8,956
4,700
1998
1998
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 6 (g)
1,850
425
2,423
655
425
3,078
3,503
1,833
1998
1998
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 7 & 8 (g)
5,392
680
4,584
4,947
680
9,531
10,211
5,580
1998
1998
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 9 (g)
3,750
800
4,355
1,945
800
6,300
7,100
2,986
1998
1998
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 10
—
933
4,779
599
933
5,378
6,311
2,601
2001
1999
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 11
—
638
3,764
1,316
638
5,080
5,718
2,771
1999
1999
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 12
—
340
2,419
383
340
2,802
3,142
1,608
2000
2002
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 13
—
282
2,569
417
282
2,986
3,268
1,923
2000
2002
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 14
—
722
2,629
1,027
722
3,656
4,378
1,782
2000
2003
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 15
—
731
—
6,266
731
6,266
6,997
3,237
2000
2007
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 16
—
519
4,248
1,493
519
5,741
6,260
3,175
2000
2005
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 17
—
373
1,945
799
373
2,744
3,117
1,382
2000
2004
77
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 2017
(In thousands, except footnotes)
Description
Encumbrances
Initial Cost to the Company
Costs
Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
Accumulated Depreciation
Year Acquired
Year Constructed
Land
Buildings and Improvements
Land
Buildings and Improvements
Total
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 18
—
323
1,512
259
323
1,771
2,094
883
2005
1995
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 19
—
373
2,256
1,126
373
3,382
3,755
1,946
2000
2004
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 20
—
1,008
1,948
2,060
1,008
4,008
5,016
1,976
2000
2004
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 21
—
436
—
3,942
436
3,942
4,378
1,492
2000/03
2006
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 22
—
436
—
4,542
436
4,542
4,978
2,111
2000
2007
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 23
—
910
—
7,347
910
7,347
8,257
2,989
2000
2007
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 24
—
837
—
5,883
837
5,883
6,720
2,354
2005
2008
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 25
—
508
—
3,882
508
3,882
4,390
1,454
2005
2008
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 26 (f)
2,077
445
—
3,194
445
3,194
3,639
1,124
2005
2008
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 27
—
837
—
5,004
837
5,004
5,841
1,782
2005
2008
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 28 (f)
2,977
550
—
4,665
550
4,665
5,215
1,559
2005
2009
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 29 (f)
2,810
782
—
4,141
974
3,949
4,923
1,247
2007
2009
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 30 (f)
3,870
981
—
5,798
1,222
5,557
6,779
2,079
2007
2009
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 31A
—
684
—
4,087
684
4,087
4,771
1,567
2008
2011
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 31B
—
546
—
3,539
546
3,539
4,085
1,069
2008
2012
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 32 (h)
3,747
1,225
—
5,655
1,526
5,354
6,880
1,244
2007
2012
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 33
—
1,166
—
7,867
1,166
7,867
9,033
1,401
2011
2013
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 34
—
439
—
3,373
439
3,373
3,812
683
2005
2012
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 35
—
340
—
2,475
340
2,475
2,815
419
2005
2012
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 36
—
684
—
4,882
684
4,882
5,566
913
2011
2013
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 37
—
759
—
6,400
759
6,400
7,159
1,144
2011
2013
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 38
—
1,053
—
7,320
1,053
7,320
8,373
1,346
2011
2013
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 39
—
620
—
5,202
620
5,202
5,822
611
2011
2014
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 40
—
1,072
—
9,347
1,072
9,347
10,419
1,028
2011
2014
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 41
—
649
—
5,950
649
5,950
6,599
572
2011
2014
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr 42
—
571
—
4,814
571
4,814
5,385
409
2011
2015
Central Green Distribution Center
—
566
4,031
794
566
4,825
5,391
2,356
1999
1998
Glenmont Business Park
—
936
6,161
2,958
936
9,119
10,055
5,416
1998
1999/2000
Beltway Crossing Business Park I
—
458
5,712
2,737
458
8,449
8,907
4,436
2002
2001
Beltway Crossing Business Park II
—
415
—
2,997
415
2,997
3,412
1,268
2005
2007
Beltway Crossing Business Park III
—
460
—
3,124
460
3,124
3,584
1,371
2005
2008
78
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 2017
(In thousands, except footnotes)
Description
Encumbrances
Initial Cost to the Company
Costs
Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
Accumulated Depreciation
Year Acquired
Year Constructed
Land
Buildings and Improvements
Land
Buildings and Improvements
Total
Beltway Crossing Business Park IV
—
460
—
3,056
460
3,056
3,516
1,327
2005
2008
Beltway Crossing Business Park V (f)
3,358
701
—
5,181
701
5,181
5,882
2,026
2005
2008
Beltway Crossing Business Park VI (h)
3,751
618
—
6,268
618
6,268
6,886
1,911
2005
2008
Beltway Crossing Business Park VII (h)
3,663
765
—
5,961
765
5,961
6,726
2,381
2005
2009
Beltway Crossing Business Park VIII
—
721
—
5,219
721
5,219
5,940
1,407
2005
2011
Beltway Crossing Business Park IX
—
418
—
2,114
418
2,114
2,532
460
2007
2012
Beltway Crossing Business Park X
—
733
—
3,871
733
3,871
4,604
773
2007
2012
Beltway Crossing Business Park XI
—
690
—
4,101
690
4,101
4,791
681
2007
2013
West Road Business Park I
—
621
—
4,031
541
4,111
4,652
593
2012
2014
West Road Business Park II
—
981
—
4,819
854
4,946
5,800
611
2012
2014
West Road Business Park III
—
597
—
4,222
520
4,299
4,819
222
2012
2015
West Road Business Park IV
—
621
—
4,622
541
4,702
5,243
414
2012
2015
Ten West Crossing 1
—
566
—
2,997
566
2,997
3,563
548
2012
2013
Ten West Crossing 2
—
829
—
4,385
833
4,381
5,214
978
2012
2013
Ten West Crossing 3
—
609
—
4,362
613
4,358
4,971
913
2012
2013
Ten West Crossing 4
—
694
—
4,512
699
4,507
5,206
876
2012
2014
Ten West Crossing 5
—
933
—
5,872
940
5,865
6,805
823
2012
2014
Ten West Crossing 6
—
640
—
4,402
644
4,398
5,042
525
2012
2014
Ten West Crossing 7
—
584
—
5,320
588
5,316
5,904
335
2012
2015
El Paso
Butterfield Trail
—
—
20,725
8,756
—
29,481
29,481
18,626
1997/2000
1987/95
Rojas Commerce Park (g)
4,106
900
3,659
3,216
900
6,875
7,775
5,090
1999
1986
Americas Ten Business Center I
—
526
2,778
1,241
526
4,019
4,545
2,303
2001
2003
San Antonio
Alamo Downs Distribution Center
—
1,342
6,338
1,554
1,342
7,892
9,234
4,328
2004
1986/2002
Arion Business Park 1-13, 15
—
4,143
31,432
6,640
4,143
38,072
42,215
17,801
2005
1988-2000/06
Arion Business Park 14
—
423
—
3,460
423
3,460
3,883
1,411
2005
2006
Arion Business Park 16
—
427
—
3,699
427
3,699
4,126
1,341
2005
2007
Arion Business Park 17
—
616
—
4,143
616
4,143
4,759
2,248
2005
2007
Arion Business Park 18 (h)
1,520
418
—
2,373
418
2,373
2,791
1,059
2005
2008
Wetmore Business Center 1-4
—
1,494
10,804
3,543
1,494
14,347
15,841
7,214
2005
1998/99
79
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 2017
(In thousands, except footnotes)
Description
Encumbrances
Initial Cost to the Company
Costs
Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
Accumulated Depreciation
Year Acquired
Year Constructed
Land
Buildings and Improvements
Land
Buildings and Improvements
Total
Wetmore Business Center 5 (f)
2,281
412
—
3,584
412
3,584
3,996
1,636
2006
2008
Wetmore Business Center 6 (f)
2,463
505
—
3,809
505
3,809
4,314
1,417
2006
2008
Wetmore Business Center 7 (f)
2,538
546
—
3,899
546
3,899
4,445
1,213
2006
2008
Wetmore Business Center 8 (f)
4,987
1,056
—
7,680
1,056
7,680
8,736
2,625
2006
2008
Fairgrounds Business Park
—
1,644
8,209
2,229
1,644
10,438
12,082
5,110
2007
1985/86
Rittiman Distribution Center
—
1,083
6,649
337
1,083
6,986
8,069
1,379
2011
2000
Thousand Oaks Distribution Center 1
—
607
—
4,292
607
4,292
4,899
1,230
2008
2012
Thousand Oaks Distribution Center 2
—
794
—
4,719
794
4,719
5,513
1,125
2008
2012
Thousand Oaks Distribution Center 3
—
772
—
4,457
772
4,457
5,229
938
2008
2013
Thousand Oaks Distribution Center 4
—
753
—
4,688
753
4,688
5,441
363
2013
2015
Alamo Ridge Business Park I
—
623
—
7,984
623
7,984
8,607
881
2007
2015
Alamo Ridge Business Park II
—
402
—
5,347
402
5,347
5,749
391
2007
2015
Alamo Ridge Business Park III
—
907
—
10,123
907
10,123
11,030
329
2007
2017
Eisenhauer Point Business Park 1 & 2
—
1,881
—
14,642
1,881
14,642
16,523
712
2015
2016
Eisenhauer Point Business Park 4
—
555
—
4,816
555
4,816
5,371
93
2015
2017
Austin
Colorado Crossing Distribution Center (g)
12,913
4,602
19,757
94
4,602
19,851
24,453
3,821
2014
2009
Southpark Corporate Center 3 & 4
—
2,670
14,756
912
2,670
15,668
18,338
2,326
2015
1995
Southpark Corporate Center 5-7
—
1,301
7,589
786
1,301
8,375
9,676
270
2017
1995
Springdale Business Center
—
2,824
8,398
324
2,824
8,722
11,546
986
2015
2000
ARIZONA
Phoenix area
Broadway Industrial Park I
—
837
3,349
1,063
837
4,412
5,249
2,794
1996
1971
Broadway Industrial Park II
—
455
482
306
455
788
1,243
441
1999
1971
Broadway Industrial Park III
—
775
1,742
523
775
2,265
3,040
1,398
2000
1983
Broadway Industrial Park IV
—
380
1,652
783
380
2,435
2,815
1,591
2000
1986
Broadway Industrial Park V
—
353
1,090
146
353
1,236
1,589
691
2002
1980
Broadway Industrial Park VI
—
599
1,855
738
599
2,593
3,192
1,585
2002
1979
Broadway Industrial Park VII
—
450
650
243
450
893
1,343
224
2011
1999
Kyrene Distribution Center
—
1,490
4,453
1,863
1,490
6,316
7,806
3,857
1999
1981/2001
Southpark Distribution Center
—
918
2,738
1,934
918
4,672
5,590
1,820
2001
2000
80
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 2017
(In thousands, except footnotes)
Description
Encumbrances
Initial Cost to the Company
Costs
Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
Accumulated Depreciation
Year Acquired
Year Constructed
Land
Buildings and Improvements
Land
Buildings and Improvements
Total
Santan 10 Distribution Center I
—
846
2,647
658
846
3,305
4,151
1,472
2001
2005
Santan 10 Distribution Center II
—
1,088
—
5,163
1,088
5,163
6,251
2,238
2004
2007
Chandler Freeways
—
1,525
—
7,381
1,525
7,381
8,906
1,124
2012
2013
Kyrene 202 Business Park I
—
653
—
5,777
653
5,777
6,430
592
2011
2014
Kyrene 202 Business Park II
—
387
—
3,414
387
3,414
3,801
352
2011
2014
Kyrene 202 Business Park VI
—
936
—
8,290
936
8,290
9,226
371
2011
2015
Metro Business Park
—
1,927
7,708
7,139
1,927
14,847
16,774
10,251
1996
1977/79
35th Avenue Distribution Center
—
418
2,381
2,118
418
4,499
4,917
1,487
1997
1967
51st Avenue Distribution Center
—
300
2,029
995
300
3,024
3,324
1,944
1998
1987
East University Distribution Center I and II
—
1,120
4,482
1,799
1,120
6,281
7,401
4,120
1998
1987/89
East University Distribution Center III
—
444
698
422
443
1,121
1,564
336
2010
1981
55th Avenue Distribution Center
—
912
3,717
1,116
917
4,828
5,745
3,267
1998
1987
Interstate Commons Distribution Center I
—
311
1,416
720
311
2,136
2,447
1,308
1999
1988
Interstate Commons Distribution Center III
—
242
—
3,079
242
3,079
3,321
1,035
2000
2008
Airport Commons Distribution Center
—
1,000
1,510
1,485
1,000
2,995
3,995
1,838
2003
1971
40th Avenue Distribution Center (f)
3,860
703
—
6,059
703
6,059
6,762
2,078
2004
2008
Sky Harbor Business Park
—
5,839
—
21,754
5,839
21,754
27,593
7,186
2006
2008
Sky Harbor Business Park 6
—
807
—
2,177
807
2,177
2,984
183
2014
2015
Ten Sky Harbor Business Center
—
1,568
—
5,009
1,569
5,008
6,577
82
2015
2016
Tucson
Country Club Commerce Center I
—
506
3,564
2,173
693
5,550
6,243
2,660
1997/2003
1994/2003
Country Club Commerce Center II
—
442
3,381
304
709
3,418
4,127
1,212
2007
2000
Country Club Commerce Center III & IV
—
1,407
—
11,833
1,575
11,665
13,240
4,279
2007
2009
Airport Distribution Center
—
1,403
4,672
1,619
1,403
6,291
7,694
3,827
1998/2000
1995
Southpointe Distribution Center
—
—
3,982
2,950
—
6,932
6,932
4,450
1999
1989
Benan Distribution Center
—
707
1,842
648
707
2,490
3,197
1,424
2005
2001
81
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 2017
(In thousands, except footnotes)
Description
Encumbrances
Initial Cost to the Company
Costs
Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
Accumulated Depreciation
Year Acquired
Year Constructed
Land
Buildings and Improvements
Land
Buildings and Improvements
Total
NORTH CAROLINA
Charlotte area
NorthPark Business Park
—
2,758
15,932
4,645
2,758
20,577
23,335
9,459
2006
1987-89
Lindbergh Business Park
—
470
3,401
482
470
3,883
4,353
1,601
2007
2001/03
Commerce Park Center I
—
765
4,303
842
765
5,145
5,910
1,999
2007
1983
Commerce Park Center II (h)
1,221
335
1,603
304
335
1,907
2,242
626
2010
1987
Commerce Park Center III (h)
2,034
558
2,225
952
558
3,177
3,735
971
2010
1981
Nations Ford Business Park
—
3,924
16,171
3,441
3,924
19,612
23,536
8,884
2007
1989/94
Airport Commerce Center
—
1,454
10,136
2,260
1,454
12,396
13,850
4,260
2008
2001/02
Interchange Park I (f)
5,442
986
7,949
598
986
8,547
9,533
2,759
2008
1989
Interchange Park II
—
746
1,456
55
746
1,511
2,257
224
2013
2000
Ridge Creek Distribution Center I
—
1,284
13,163
976
1,284
14,139
15,423
4,157
2008
2006
Ridge Creek Distribution Center II (h)
9,067
3,033
11,497
2,116
3,033
13,613
16,646
2,699
2011
2003
Ridge Creek Distribution Center III
—
2,459
11,147
538
2,459
11,685
14,144
1,474
2014
2013
Lakeview Business Center (h)
4,017
1,392
5,068
916
1,392
5,984
7,376
1,492
2011
1996
Steele Creek Commerce Park I (g)
2,803
993
—
4,315
1,010
4,298
5,308
770
2013
2014
Steele Creek Commerce Park II (g)
2,852
941
—
4,459
957
4,443
5,400
775
2013
2014
Steele Creek Commerce Park III
—
1,464
—
6,412
1,469
6,407
7,876
889
2013
2014
Steele Creek Commerce Park IV
—
684
—
3,945
687
3,942
4,629
467
2013
2015
Steele Creek Commerce Park VI
—
867
—
6,974
869
6,972
7,841
227
2013/14
2016
Waterford Distribution Center
—
654
3,392
655
654
4,047
4,701
1,276
2008
2000
82
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 2017
(In thousands, except footnotes)
Description
Encumbrances
Initial Cost to the Company
Costs
Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
Accumulated Depreciation
Year Acquired
Year Constructed
Land
Buildings and Improvements
Land
Buildings and Improvements
Total
GEORGIA
Atlanta
Shiloh 400 Business Center I & II
—
3,092
14,216
1,488
3,092
15,704
18,796
672
2017
2008
Broadmoor Commerce Park I
—
1,307
3,560
496
1,307
4,056
5,363
228
2017
1999
Hurricane Shoals I & II
—
4,284
12,449
1,141
4,284
13,590
17,874
40
2017
2017
LOUISIANA
New Orleans
Elmwood Business Park
—
2,861
6,337
5,026
2,861
11,363
14,224
7,841
1997
1979
Riverbend Business Park
—
2,557
17,623
8,471
2,557
26,094
28,651
14,573
1997
1984
COLORADO
Denver
Rampart Distribution Center I
—
1,023
3,861
2,093
1,023
5,954
6,977
4,309
1988
1987
Rampart Distribution Center II
—
230
2,977
1,173
230
4,150
4,380
2,782
1996/97
1996/97
Rampart Distribution Center III
—
1,098
3,884
1,931
1,098
5,815
6,913
3,092
1997/98
1999
Rampart Distribution Center IV
—
590
—
8,322
590
8,322
8,912
623
2012
2014
Concord Distribution Center (h)
3,413
1,051
4,773
443
1,051
5,216
6,267
1,996
2007
2000
Centennial Park (f)
3,381
750
3,319
1,853
750
5,172
5,922
1,822
2007
1990
NEVADA
Las Vegas
Arville Distribution Center
—
4,933
5,094
424
4,933
5,518
10,451
1,823
2009
1997
Jones Corporate Park
—
13,068
26,325
1,682
13,068
28,007
41,075
746
2016
2016
MISSISSIPPI
Jackson area
Interchange Business Park
—
343
5,007
3,984
343
8,991
9,334
5,589
1997
1981
Tower Automotive
—
—
9,958
1,937
17
11,878
11,895
4,926
2001
2002
Metro Airport Commerce Center I
—
303
1,479
1,134
303
2,613
2,916
1,576
2001
2003
200,354
343,254
1,030,428
961,777
345,424
1,990,035
2,335,459
749,275
83
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 2017
(In thousands, except footnotes)
Description
Encumbrances
Initial Cost to the Company
Costs
Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
Accumulated Depreciation
Year Acquired
Year Constructed
Land
Buildings and Improvements
Land
Buildings and Improvements
Total
Industrial Development (d):
FLORIDA
Oak Creek Distribution Center VII
—
740
—
5,391
740
5,391
6,131
—
2005
2017
Oak Creek Distribution Center land
—
486
—
1,074
707
853
1,560
—
2005
n/a
Horizon Commerce Park X
—
846
—
2,704
846
2,704
3,550
—
2009
n/a
Horizon Commerce Park XII
—
1,416
—
9,814
1,416
9,814
11,230
14
2008
2017
Horizon Commerce Park land
—
4,439
—
6,681
4,440
6,680
11,120
—
2008/09
n/a
SunCoast Commerce Center IV
—
1,733
—
7,387
1,762
7,358
9,120
56
2006
2017
SunCoast Commerce Center land
—
9,159
—
4,953
9,343
4,769
14,112
—
2006
n/a
Weston Commerce Park
—
4,163
9,951
1,406
4,163
11,357
15,520
231
2016
1998
Gateway Commerce Park land
—
26,728
—
4,148
26,878
3,998
30,876
—
2016
n/a
TEXAS
CreekView 121 3 & 4
—
2,600
—
7,711
2,600
7,711
10,311
—
2015/16
n/a
CreekView 121 land
—
5,322
—
1,203
5,322
1,203
6,525
—
2015/16
n/a
Parc North land
—
2,519
—
552
2,519
552
3,071
—
2016
n/a
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr land
—
2,989
—
2,119
3,723
1,385
5,108
—
2007
n/a
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr land - 2011 expansion
—
1,636
—
4,320
2,920
3,036
5,956
—
2011
n/a
World Houston Int'l Business Ctr land - 2015 expansion
—
6,040
—
1,132
6,041
1,131
7,172
—
2015
n/a
Ten West Crossing land
—
1,126
—
806
1,135
797
1,932
—
2012
n/a
West Road Business Park land
—
484
—
538
421
601
1,022
—
2012
n/a
Alamo Ridge Business Park IV
—
354
—
6,743
355
6,742
7,097
23
2007
2017
Eisenhauer Point Business Park 3
—
577
—
5,582
578
5,581
6,159
—
2015
2017
Eisenhauer Point Business Park 5
—
818
—
4,986
818
4,986
5,804
—
2015
n/a
Eisenhauer Point Business Park 6
—
569
—
3,481
569
3,481
4,050
—
2015
n/a
Eisenhauer Point Business Park land phase 2
—
3,225
—
2,507
3,225
2,507
5,732
—
2016
n/a
Tri-County Crossing land
—
5,260
—
402
5,260
402
5,662
—
2017
n/a
Settlers Crossing 1
—
1,211
—
345
1,211
345
1,556
—
2017
n/a
Settlers Crossing 2
—
1,306
—
367
1,306
367
1,673
—
2017
n/a
Settlers Crossing land
—
2,774
—
246
2,774
246
3,020
—
2017
n/a
84
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 2017
(In thousands, except footnotes)
Description
Encumbrances
Initial Cost to the Company
Costs
Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period
Accumulated Depreciation
Year Acquired
Year Constructed
Land
Buildings and Improvements
Land
Buildings and Improvements
Total
ARIZONA
Kyrene 202 Business Park 3, 4 & 5
—
1,244
—
10,299
1,244
10,299
11,543
—
2011
n/a
Falcon Field Business Center
—
1,312
—
1,635
1,312
1,635
2,947
—
2015
n/a
Country Club Commerce Center V
—
2,885
—
11,066
2,886
11,065
13,951
—
2016
n/a
NORTH CAROLINA
Steele Creek Commerce Park VII
—
1,207
—
6,590
1,209
6,588
7,797
—
2013/14/15
2017
Airport Commerce Center III
—
855
—
878
855
878
1,733
—
2008
n/a
Steele Creek Commerce Park land
—
3,318
—
1,250
3,330
1,238
4,568
—
2013-2016
n/a
Steele Creek Commerce Park land Phase 4
—
1,866
—
294
1,866
294
2,160
—
2016/17
n/a
GEORGIA
Progress Center I & II
—
1,297
9,015
21
1,297
9,036
10,333
2
2017
2017
Broadmoor Commerce Park land
—
519
—
186
519
186
705
—
2017
n/a
Progress Center land
—
497
—
5
497
5
502
—
2017
n/a
MISSISSIPPI
Metro Airport Commerce Center II land
—
307
—
399
307
399
706
—
2001
n/a
—
103,827
18,966
119,221
106,394
135,620
242,014
326
Total real estate owned (a)(b)
$
200,354
447,081
1,049,394
1,080,998
451,818
2,125,655
2,577,473
749,601
See accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
.
85
(a) Changes in
Real Estate Properties
follow:
Years Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of year
$
2,406,981
2,219,448
2,074,946
Purchases of real estate properties
51,802
22,228
28,648
Development of real estate properties
124,938
203,765
95,032
Improvements to real estate properties
27,471
23,157
25,778
Carrying amount of investments sold
(32,787
)
(61,121
)
(4,750
)
Write-off of improvements
(932
)
(496
)
(206
)
Balance at end of year
(1)
$
2,577,473
2,406,981
2,219,448
(1)
Includes
20%
noncontrolling interest in University Business Center of
$3,217,000
and
$6,853,000
at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Changes in the accumulated depreciation on real estate properties follow:
Years Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of year
$
694,250
657,454
600,526
Depreciation expense
69,010
63,793
59,882
Accumulated depreciation on assets sold
(12,735
)
(26,501
)
(2,748
)
Other
(924
)
(496
)
(206
)
Balance at end of year
$
749,601
694,250
657,454
(b)
The estimated aggregate cost of real estate properties at
December 31, 2017
for federal income tax purposes was approximately
$2,536,820,000
before estimated accumulated tax depreciation of
$518,257,000
. The federal income tax return for the year ended
December 31, 2017
, has not been filed and accordingly, this estimate is based on preliminary data.
(c)
The Company computes depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the buildings (generally
40
years) and improvements (generally
3
to
15
years).
(d)
The Company transfers development projects to
Real estate properties
the earlier of
80%
occupancy or
one
year after completion of the shell construction. Effective January 1, 2018, the Company is implementing an accounting policy change and will begin transferring properties from
Development
to
Real estate properties
at the earlier of
90%
occupancy or
one
year after completion of the shell construction.
(e)
EastGroup has a
$49,580,000
non-recourse first mortgage loan with an insurance company secured by Dominguez, Industry I & III, Kingsview, Shaw, Walnut and Washington.
(f)
EastGroup has a
$55,317,000
non-recourse first mortgage loan with an insurance company secured by 40th Avenue, Beltway Crossing V, Centennial Park, Executive Airport, Interchange Park I, Ocean View, Wetmore 5-8 and World Houston 26, 28, 29 & 30.
(g)
EastGroup has a
$50,161,000
non-recourse first mortgage loan with an insurance company secured by Colorado Crossing, Interstate I-III, Rojas, Steele Creek 1 & 2, Venture and World Houston 3-9.
(h)
EastGroup has a
$42,315,000
non-recourse first mortgage loan with an insurance company secured by Arion 18, Beltway Crossing VI & VII, Commerce Park II & III, Concord, Interstate V-VII, Lakeview, Ridge Creek II, Southridge IV & V and World Houston 32.
86
SCHEDULE IV
MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
December 31, 2017
Number of Loans
Interest
Rate
Maturity Date
Periodic
Payment Terms
First mortgage loans:
JCB Limited - California
1
5.15
%
December 2022
Principal and interest due monthly
JCB Limited - California
1
5.15
%
December 2022
Principal and interest due monthly
Total mortgage loans (a)
2
Face Amount
of Mortgages
Dec. 31, 2017
Carrying
Amount of
Mortgages
Principal
Amount of Loans
Subject to Delinquent
Principal or Interest (b)
(In thousands)
First mortgage loans:
JCB Limited - California
$
1,826
1,826
—
JCB Limited - California
2,755
2,755
—
Total mortgage loans
$
4,581
4,581
(c)(d)
—
(a)
Reference is made to allowance for possible losses on mortgage loans receivable in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(b)
Interest in arrears for three months or less is disregarded in computing principal amount of loans subject to delinquent interest.
(c)
Changes in mortgage loans follow:
Years Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of year
$
4,752
4,875
4,991
Payments on mortgage loans receivable
(171
)
(123
)
(116
)
Balance at end of year
$
4,581
4,752
4,875
(d) The aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes is approximately
$4.58 million
. The federal income tax return for the year ended
December 31, 2017
, has not been filed and, accordingly, the income tax basis of mortgage loans as of
December 31, 2017
, is based on preliminary data.
See accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
87
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC.
By: /s/ MARSHALL A. LOEB
Marshall A. Loeb, Chief Executive Officer, President & Director
February 14, 2018
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
*
*
D. Pike Aloian, Director
H. C. Bailey, Jr., Director
February 14, 2018
February 14, 2018
*
*
H. Eric Bolton, Jr., Director
Donald F. Colleran, Director
February 14, 2018
February 14, 2018
*
*
Hayden C. Eaves III, Director
Fredric H. Gould, Director
February 14, 2018
February 14, 2018
*
*
Mary Elizabeth McCormick, Director
Leland R. Speed, Chairman Emeritus of the Board
February 14, 2018
February 14, 2018
*
/s/ BRENT W. WOOD
David H. Hoster II, Chairman of the Board
* By Brent W. Wood, Attorney-in-fact
February 14, 2018
February 14, 2018
/s/ MARSHALL A. LOEB
Marshall A. Loeb, Chief Executive Officer,
President & Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
February 14, 2018
/s/ BRUCE CORKERN
Bruce Corkern, Sr. Vice-President, Chief Accounting Officer
and Secretary
(Principal Accounting Officer)
February 14, 2018
/s/ BRENT W. WOOD
Brent W. Wood, Executive Vice-President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
February 14, 2018
88
EXHIBIT INDEX
(3)
Exhibits:
The following exhibits are filed with this Form 10-K or incorporated by reference to the listed document previously filed with the SEC:
Number
Description
(3)
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
(a)
Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the Company's Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on June 5, 1997).
(b)
Amended and Restated Bylaws of EastGroup Properties, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed March 3, 2017).
(10)
Material Contracts (*Indicates management or compensatory agreement):
(a)
Form of Severance and Change in Control Agreement that the Company has entered into with Marshall A. Loeb, Brent W. Wood and John F. Coleman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Company's Form 8-K filed May 18, 2016).*
(b)
Form of Severance and Change in Control Agreement that the Company has entered into with Ryan M. Collins, C. Bruce Corkern and R. Reid Dunbar (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the Company's Form 8-K filed May 18, 2016).*
(c)
Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement Dated January 2, 2013 among EastGroup Properties, L.P.; EastGroup Properties, Inc.; PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent; Regions Bank and SunTrust Bank as Co-Syndication Agents; U.S. Bank National Association and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Co-Documentation Agents; PNC Capital Markets LLC, as Sole Lead Arranger and Sole Bookrunner; and the Lenders thereunder (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed January 8, 2013).
(d)
First Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of August 9, 2013, among EastGroup Properties, L.P., EastGroup Properties, Inc. and PNC Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, and each of the financial institutions party thereto as lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 8-K filed August 30, 2013).
(e)
Second Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of July 30, 2015 by and among EastGroup Properties, L.P.; EastGroup Properties, Inc.; PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent; and each of the financial institutions party thereto as lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed August 4, 2015).
(f)
EastGroup Properties, Inc. 2013 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of March 3, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed March 3, 2017).*
(g)
EastGroup Properties, Inc. Director Compensation Program (filed herewith).*
(h)
Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 28, 2013, among EastGroup Properties, L.P., EastGroup Properties, Inc. and the purchasers of the notes party thereto (including the form of the 3.80% Senior Notes due August 28, 2025) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed August 30, 2013).
(i)
Amended and Restated Sales Agency Financing Agreement dated March 6, 2017 between EastGroup Properties, Inc. and BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed March 10, 2017).
(j)
Amended and Restated Sales Agency Financing Agreement dated March 6, 2017 between EastGroup Properties, Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 to the Company's Form 8-K filed March 10, 2017).
(k)
Amended and Restated Sales Agency Financing Agreement dated March 6, 2017 between EastGroup Properties, Inc. and Raymond James & Associates, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.3 to the Company's Form 8-K filed March 10, 2017).
(l)
Sales Agency Financing Agreement dated March 6, 2017 between EastGroup Properties, Inc. and Jefferies LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.4 to the Company's Form 8-K filed March 10, 2017).
(12)
Statement of computation of ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock distributions (filed herewith).
89
(21)
Subsidiaries of EastGroup Properties, Inc. (filed herewith).
(23)
Consent of KPMG LLP (filed herewith).
(24)
Powers of attorney (filed herewith).
(31)
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications (pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
(a)
Marshall A. Loeb, Chief Executive Officer
(b)
Brent W. Wood, Chief Financial Officer
(32)
Section 1350 Certifications (pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
(a)
Marshall A. Loeb, Chief Executive Officer
(b)
Brent W. Wood, Chief Financial Officer
(99)
Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed February 14, 2018).
(101)
The following materials from EastGroup Properties, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) consolidated balance sheets, (ii) consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, (iii) consolidated statements of changes in equity, (iv) consolidated statements of cash flows, and (v) the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
90